Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBaxter Property APPENDIX IA & 1B GREENHOUSE CONSULTANTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ASSESSMENT OF THE BAXTER PROPERTY, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: the Maguire Group Inc. 3237 Route 112 Medford, New York 11763 Prepared by- Alfred Cammisa Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 40 Exchange Place New York, New York 10005 January 1994 Acknowledgments We would like to thank Dr. Ralph Solecki for his help with the locations and descriptions of the archaeological sites within the prolecE area. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Listof Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Geography and Physical Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Prehistoric Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Historic Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Conclusion and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ni C, UST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The project area shown on the U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series Mattituck, Mattituck Hills, Southampton and Southold quadrangles, 1956. Figure 2 The location of Fort Corchaug and the contemporary forts on eastern Long Island and Connecticut (Solecki 1950: 13). Figure 3 Sketch of Fort Corchaug showing cartway. Figure 4 From Moore's map of 1797. Figure 5 From Burr's map of 1 B29. Figure 6 From Chace's map of 1858. Figure 7 From Hyde's map of 1896. Figure 8 From Hyde's map of 1906. Figure 9 Map of project area showing Fort Corchaug and Rail Fence Well (Baxter) Sites. IV INTRODUCTION From November 15th through December 23rd, 1993, Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated conducted a Stage IA archaeological research evaluation of the Baxter property in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The purpose of this research was to initially assess the prehistoric and historic potential of the project area. The Stage IA evaluation utilized archival literature and maps, a visual inspection of the project area and interviews with a former property owner and a local museum administrator. An inspection of prehistoric artifacts was also conducted. The artifacts came from the property and are held by the former owner and the local museum. The research was conducted for the Maguire Group of Medford, New York. The site inspection and artifact evaluation was conducted by Alfred Cammisa and Felicia Burgos Cammisa. The interviews and historic literature research was conducted by Alfred Cammisa and Felicia Burgos Cammisa. Report preparation was conducted by Alfred Cammisa, Principal Investigator. Word processing was by Felicia Burgos Cammisa. Editing was by Paula Crowley, William I. Roberts IV and William Sandy. 1 C, GEOGRAPHY AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT The project area is located in the eastern part of Suffolk County, in the southeast part of the state (Figure 1). This portion of New York lies in the Atlantic Coastal Plains province (Schuberth 1968: cover map). This region of Suffolk County lies on a glacial outwash plain just south of the Harbor Hill Moraine (Van Diver 1985: 70). Elevations in the area generally extend from 5 to 32.5 feet above mean sea level. The project area lies in the southwest part of the Town of Southold on the North Fork of Long Island. The parcel is approximately 105 acres and is bounded on the north by Main Street (Route 25) and on the south by New Suffolk Avenue and on the east by Downs Creek. Soils in the area consist of Plymouth loamy sand, O to 8 percent slope; Riverhead sandy loam, O to 8 percent slopes, eroded and Tidal Marsh. Plymouth loamy sands and Riverhead sandy loam are found on outwash plains and moraines. Plymouth gravelly loamy sand is generally found on short slopes along drainage channels in cultivated fields. Tidal Marsh is found on level areas not inundated by daily tide flow but subject to flooding during storm tides. Tidal Marsh has an organic mat on the surface that ranges from a few inches to several feet in thickness (Warner et aL 1975: 78, 79, 82, B3, 87). Prior to intensive utilization of the area by Euro-American populations, the primary vegetation cover in the general project area consisted of hardwoods, mainly oaks, beech, birch and maple with pitch pine and some white pine. The undergrowth included scrub oak, huckleberry, shadbrush, alder and in wetter zones, blueberry (Warner et aL 1975: 92). At the time of the Stage IA investigation, the western two-thirds of the project area consisted of a farm field. The western half of the field was lying fallow, covered in dead vegetation and weeds. The eastern section of the field was planted in clover and hay. The eastern most section of the project area consisted of a young forest, 25 to 50 years old, of mostly oaks, maples, some pine. Undergrowth consisted chiefly of mountain laurel. Between the forest and -the- creek- -lied a tidal—-marsh. Blueberry grew along the forest/marsh fringe. The northern most section of the parcel contains a series of several building ruins within 400 feet of Main Street. Beginning with the western most building and continuing east, the ruins include: a large rectangular brick foundation with only the cellar hole remaining; 2 wood farm outbuildings, one with farm machinery within it; and a partially collapsed wood frame house (Roberts, personal communication 1993). 2 C, _PREHISTORIC SENSITIVITY The project area contains an important Native American site currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Fort Corchaug is a well known and recorded contact period site (Solecki 1950 and 1985; Williams 1972). It may also contain evidence of prehistoric occupation (Solecki 1950: 341 that remains to be documented. It will be discussed with more detail in the chapter on Historic Sensitivity. Prehistoric material is abundant along the North Fork of Long Island. The remains of 45 village sites are located here (Booth 1949: 54). A wealth of archaeological materials now reside at the Southold Museum, some of them from the Cutchogue area. A second archaeological site lies within the project area. The Rail_ Fence Well Site., previously known as the Baxter site, is also located on the west side of Downs Creek, about 1200 feet south of Fort Corchaug. It covers at least 600_sq_uare feet (Ritchie 1980: 169, Solecki 1950: 15 and personal communication 1993; Salwen 1962: 39). This site is a multi-component site dating from Transitional through Contact period cultures (Solecki, personal communication 1993; Salwen 1962). An old hollow tree trunk situated here contained a spring welling up from within it, hence, the site's name (Solecki personal communication 1993). The former landowner, Mrs. James Dean, owns a collection of projectile points from the project area. A brief examination of the projectile points indicated a time/culture span from Archaic through Woodland. The inventory included Levana and Meadowood type points and possible Squibnocket and Genesee points. If more time was had with the collection, it is possible that a slightly different interpretation could be offered on the actual point types but not on the time/culture phases. According to Mrs. Dean, the artifacts were discovered in the 1940s with the use of a hand plow. They were situated to the northwest of the fort, on the fringe of the plowed fields near the unplowed area which is now wooded. Solecki (personal communication 19931 reported a large area of quartz debitage in the southern end of the project area that extends from the forested area into the previously plowed field. The area of debitage extends from 300 to 900 feet west of Downs Creek and from New Suffolk Avenue north about 750 feet. This artifact concentration is just west of the prehistoric Rail Fence Well site. This site could represent an association and extension of the Rail Fence Well site or it could represent a separate site altogether. The location of Native American sites situated on the west bank of creeks, such as Downs Creek, is a settlement pattern seen over much of Long Island (Ritchie 1980: 169) 3 C, Other prehistoric sites listed within a mile of the project area by the_New York State Museum include: #692 Solecki Site - contained burials - Transitional #4881 (no name) - stockade site 3/4 acre (this is probably the Fort Corchaug Site inaccurately located 1 mile to the east) #4882 (no name) - village site #7805 (no name) - containing burials and camp sites #8240 Grathwold - village site - Woodland #8241 Fort Neck - no information available but this is also probably the Fort Corchaug Site which is located on Fort Neck. #8243 Corchaug Neck - no information available but this is also most likely a reference to the Fort Corchaug Site #8245 Hall's Creek - no information available other than location description "salt marshes around creek" #8246 Deep Hole - shell midden - Woodland #8247 Dam Hollow - no information available The top of the west bank of Downs Creek is between 8 to 11 feet above the creek at mean sea level (Ritchie 1980: 169, Solecki 1950: 15; Salwen 1962: 39). The rest of the project area is nearly level to the top of the creek bank. Salwen (1962) mentions that the water level in Downs Creek has fluctuated widely and may have at one time been almost as high as the Baxter Site. Areas adjacent to the project area may contain sites submerged by rising sea levels (Beth Wellman, 1993, personal communication). There may also be the possibility that deeply buried cultural horizons exist on the project area. Deeply buried cultural deposits will not affect current field design, however, it could in the future, if this area were planned for development. Our conclusion is that the project area lies within a prehistorically sensitive area. 4 C, HISTORIC SENSITIVITY Historic Fort Corchaug was a Native American fort, currently listed as a National Register site, and the most studied and known of the Native American forts on Long Island (Figure 2). It was apparently in use from approximately 1640 through 1662 (Solecki 1950: 34). The remains of the site are located on the west side of Downs Creek, on Fort Neck. It lies between Route 25 (Main Street) to the north and New Suffolk Avenue to the south. It is east of the Downs Farm Road, which is now an overgrown dirt road which borders the plowed fields and the wooded lot containing the fort site. The fort walls are oriented nearly north, south, east, and west in oblong outline. The walls are 210 feet long north and south, and 160 feet long east and west. The area enclosed is close to three-quarters of an acre. Fresh water springs rise above the high tide level at several points on the bank of the creek below the fort. The site is about 11 feet above the creek at mean sea level... (Solecki 1950: 15). There had been a cartway or road running through the fort (Figure 3). During the recent site inspection, a large hole or ditch was noted in the vicinity of the fort near the east end of a barely visible berm. This hole was actually situated at the northeast corner of the fort and was supposed to be a well (Solecki 1993: personal communication and 1950: 15). The hole or pit may have also been used as a semi-subterranean sweat lodge (Hall 1974: 16). No evidence of occupation was established within the confines of the fort. Some evidence was found to the north of the fort but in negligible amounts. However, evidence was encountered to the south of the fort in great abundance, all the way down to the Peconic Bay (Solecki 1950: 21). Two test excavations were conducted by Solecki (1993 personal communication and 1950: 21) at about 250 feet and 1000 feet south of the fort. Occupational evidence was discovered including possible prehistoric artifacts. Solecki (1950: 211 believes that the Corchauq villa e lies south of the fort, nearby. This might place it near the Rail Fence Well (Baxter) Site. Much evidence of wampum making had been recorded, particularly within the fort. Every stage of manufacture was represented (Solecki 1950: 21, 28). The Corchaug inhabitants at the fort had acquired Shan nk-st��IP„�ottery which is a unique characteristic of the Thames River Valley in Connecticut. Shantok style pottery was used by the Pequots. Solecki's interpretation was that this represents "the absorption of the Peguot survivors by the Corchaugs after the defeat of the former in 1637" (Solecki 1950: �<r 34). 5 z 1 R I V E R i I I z 0 \ D I A N S \\ � Jp i cy A 'TT AB IES EC \ \ t p I (W A P I N G E R) �� :�, ���\�� 610 \\ T , E At;T C O N F E D E-r A C Y �; I rr f-HANTIC l \ WEST \ N E HANTIC / S0u • �- � rld 4 5 � on9 0 OCI< c o RICO r u E G N I, UncAC1% 0UoSE PATUK 1' P eti� the contemporary forts on eastern Long Island Figs2 Location of Fort 'CorchaugCutohoguo ; 2, Mauhaiisett fF°TeshShelter i'ort,and ; 3t Hither Fort Corchaug,MonteuK fort, t, bond; 5, and in COnneOtIc lr ton; , shinnecook fort, near Southampton; S o l e c k i 195 1 Hills; 6, Fort Shantok, Montville 20 r *. L---� 1-17 Test l ranches 3 Pit I � w e J _w. I j Pit ' —4— 4 t C' -VA_ .0 ', i E { J M.N. -'IA- LL I , , -,y_ 1 s �Test f ranches —'"- 1 1 F lO .w C, F2 U 0 F2 O 20 '40 60 80 1 1 FEET 20' Figure 3 . Sketch of Fort Chorchaug showing cartway (Solecki 1950: 16 ) C, The name Corchaug is derived from "Kehchauke'%-meening-the greatest or principal place, a refuge for the women and children of this tribe (Tooker in Solecki 1950: 141. The tribal inhabitants name for Southold was "Yennecock" (Thompson 1962: 225). The Corchaugs inhabited a large territory along the North Fork of Long Island, from Wading River to Orient Point. They reportedly had very large canoes, holding up to 80 people. Wampum making was an important activity in the area (Winthrop in Williams 1973: 34). The first English settlement on the North Fork was the village of Southold in 1639/40. It was not until 1645, however, that the first recorded purchase of land took place. The land was sold by the Corchaug sachem, Paucamp. Paucamp was about BO years old at the time and he sold the parcel to a settler, William Salmon (Southold Town Records in Williams 1973: 36, 61). The Cutchogue area was purchased about 1648/49 and settled as a farming village by colonists about 1660/61 (Williams 1973: 64: Ross 1902: 1023). Most of the first planters were from Hingham in Norfolk, England and came by way of New Haven, Connecticut (Thompson 1962: 226). The village of Cutchogue is said to have been located on the sites of ancient Indian Villages (Thompson 1962: 253). Williams (1973: 33) estimates the native Corchaug population in 1640 to have been more than 100 but less than 500. In 1698 the population in Southold Town is listed as 40 Indians "young and old" (O'Callaghan in Solecki 1950: 14). No doubt the European diseases, as well as the wars with the Pequot and Narragansetts had had their effects on the population. In 1880 the total population for the village of Cutchogue was about 825 (History of Suffolk County 1882: 28). The population now is largely Euro-American. The native inhabitants had a custom of sharing or renting their traditional territory to other Native Americans and to European settlers. Because of the original inhabitants migratory settlement patterns, colonists were able to appropriate farm land during the season or year that the tribal people were away. The distinction between buying, renting or borrowing probably became blurred as the English population outstripped the native population (Cammisa 1984: 7b). Fort Neck, including the project area had been owned by the Horton Family from about 1680. By about 1880, John Downs owned the parcel and was living there (History of Suffolk County 1882. 28). The first church in Cutchogue was established in 1732. It was an independent congregation until 1848 when it entered the Presbyterian fold (Ross 1902: 1023). A series of four historic maps were examined to determine whether any structures or other features were present within the Baxter project area. These maps depict the region from 6 C, the late eighteenth through the late nineteenth centuries. The 1797 map of the Town of Southold by Thomas Moore shows several mills and a school house in the Cutchogue area but no structures on the project area (Figure 41. The 1829 Burr map of Suffolk County also shows no structures or features of any kind on the parcel (Figure 5). The 1858 Chace map of Suffolk County shows two structures along what would now be Route 25, lust west of what is now called Downs Creek (Figure 6). The name C. Moore appears near the eastern most structure and the name J. Malford appears next to the more western one. The J. Wells structure seems to be out of the project area. The 1896 Hyde map shows three structures along Route 25 lust west of Downs Creek that appear to be on the project area. Starting with the eastern most structure and traveling west, the names that appear are Grover Moore, Wickham estate and Henry Downs. The George Young Structure may be just outside the project area (Figure 71. The 1906 Hyde map shows the Moore, Wickham and Downs structures still on the project area, however, Downs now appears to have two structures in his name (Figure 8). It is possible that the building ruins previously mentioned on page 2 of this report represent the remains of the historic buildings shown on the nineteenth century maps. It is our conclusion that the project area lies within an historically sensitive area. 7 AJ or v� 0,11 -11 Ilk pproximate roject Area Location \\ K �. _ \ `cam ' • ` , 'r.All '•'t��^� '"Y. ° �!e' ^r�: . R '' tea;.... •,, s MAP NOT TO SCALE ' Figure 4 . From Moore ' s map of 1797 At fl.-- WA0V* 11 Approximate Project Area LOG G.1 ze D I-vA; R N r,. J ".4 f2l ...HULL, 4 rt 7A it P'AN;CC-Off S-9 TO SCA L E MAP NOT-Vek $,Yy It C 0 Figure 5 . From Burr ' s map of 1829 . ]-may• - - . :/ �, � ' .- - R JoyUAS .. `til�es+,. 1\''! p:�i>.r; - -'!'•ia>o ` iii � f ^rte � � u� v 71 � vh z+f•4 .y-' ' ."[r,. 1 % _ ✓� Y1 JESSUP hcck ,7 , 4-�'sw.• t `tet'�r:. `a"la. J �'Es�` ,�..,�'E •�„�i ".�, _�Sr•v-- ”; 'r 4 CJ i O M 10 It �.•, iY�• >:4� � r• S � �°+ x¢ ti��:.`r./ IEi��'� r"•� P _-I "� � f '19A911/" 11 h F .`.' s J�,' y 'L r'1 I , ' • ­rn J a, S y� 8 t `R v ; IV ek O CD 7++,?l • 'a; i�'e ,'.I a•rt i :� •' '� � d �uu fi+,al .1✓,.••' ',�_.�� N ^'� lrj ^ vii �-� •. :il • ! K O: .u>•XX: r•'>N�.t yf - r:,ar..y I�:`sem� C'1 h ,'I .�? . T y� \• -�a+ � � ,'.bro >�•i-•�Y✓,f�rls j��-�p �>��. � 'r• .+ of `.� ... • � < i -- • �� y lei r. G ' .. 4� +1 f• ��► •t T.,rrlr t.y.. �� .J `� z w s � S. f ^ 1n , '`'Y~ _sL,',•fa!•r. y.,Jl Y✓'to».•\r 'f�s`, • °, - ruru•a a,! r c V U „��-• f r yGT�• J•- t•r't O'ii�d���V .f f' �, �--- ^ �� ,.✓..Yr✓J 1 1! 1:✓ �lr i_J•�,fn,. •v ,yl,✓.,Yr J • O 1 rVC r!rJ'�•n�� ::; :r��• \ \���� (�.r7 •�a Ol m V � ..?'r.Yr • - �y�r•i,>YJF�.�•�'C al •1• �.,� � � t Jr .,ti�yl.N:.•r• 6t' 4•^ �'� T ,fes > N �i$✓- .� Ol at �`Y< J• •,` 6R��-• y T �fN4,•al s+y",,l> \T~r•✓wll..> ; J' OY •y�.D ,G O ~ c' F� `r h_V ��fwx � � - � `J'"r�••a F `+1•J�•:\\�` �'' j. '�• .�a `y.% a s n =. I�/ • '• �f yo?'rrW�r�a 4'� ` `.+ad _�Sr..�.,l�o..n-> -- v, h !y \art=- % r.'•�, x .✓�•�; n� ' .1t q ..,\ - _ :,n.,,.. I�+ t \ 3 �yr �.�.� �d„. !u .,. ?,•Z � ¢ s t--' ; /�, r •r,.r-�. • ;� r v • + b.rte•'+� `. u+s°'9, a t /4 o Cl 24 � r- >Ii.,rv�""�• < •� i = = F : � /kms• .- nU'�ay. �' .. :'�o`",�' Approximate ,...AuN IC•.OT �ORSO 1• S, - '.• i9,�, ,r r.... •r �r a s,;� ;;r y•\ !;:'�+�``\ ` _> ✓;,�''` ,,,T��y� T ,.-Project Area Location MAP NOT Iii SCALE ;•--��r: r� �.J .r...•(u,MI• Ir..J . r•v,•J. - ------------ - Figure 7 From Hyde' s Map of 1896. Ivan : *1 ''Yr7Lr 'S y tJIKw o W 1.R _ N . •p N � � p 9 � a e • 'r •Q, � �yNo �,�t�S• d 4�ty`r•l!O� � _ 41& AP—M LnJt q0 s✓R 1 +tea ms > •� f�� , �, � � 01 Ln C o °i Pd o • At t-3 CA G ��,.� �fA lot Ale Vw p V1 V `w io� ♦ c ••�� �l / �.Dsl�l,��"�y, 7 f" i`' J.DaBrIL .54 ka Ol 0 •A to '�w S'�f7•�'s:• �i�S�i�'I• -%' n • � •, u,p N `� � +� Q_� L•+ t'f��� .�� � ,��j'd•t •+4 of e to V h e=1. 00 Aw r 4V A-1 �1 F tv tn to Z-3 cc W D,ca d'wOl- .G„ • t�-' d �lhe to per/". �• ek x w � 7• •• �J �y ` Y x ♦ x W ay H � J 0 !1 � � • !4 • � 77 1 o W atil . w ti c" xA v • It Ln A •¢ p,� w • w N ►,,• y1 • �'��. �, H F �� � � A �/��//, ,w � _ ►a c� � ., V • '� accs � ev C7 M Ln w x 'NAP IMT 70 SCALE Figure 8 . From Hyde ' s map of 1906 la i Fort Corchaug Site tz Downs. .._ � 'a Creek 0 Rail Fence Well �� �► �, � bac- - � •• �►-.. ..... ) 4► 600 FEET : - peconic Boy- Figure 9 . Map of project area showing the Fort Corchaug and Rail Fence Well (Baxter) Sites (Solecki 1950: 15 ) C, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The project area lies within an archaeologically sensitive area, containing both prehistoric and historic sites. Three areas of Prehistoric remains have been identified on this lot: 1) the area north of Fort Corchaug, in the field near the forest fringe; 2) the recorded multi-component Rail Fence Well site (Baxter site); and 3) the area of quartz debitage at the southern end of the plot extending from the forest into the field. An Historic Native American site, Fort Corchaug, currently listed on the National Register, has been identified on the project area. In addition, the several building ruins at the northern end of the plot could represent the remains of nineteenth century houses as shown on historic maps. We would recommend the following: A Phase IB archaeological survey to be conducted on the project area. The survey should consist of shovel testing at 50 foot intervals north of the fort along the wooded strip adjacent to Downs Creek and also within the salt marshes where ever possible. The section including Fort Corchaug, The Rail Fence Well (Baxter) site, and the area between the two sites hasRreviously been showr-tacoatam.archaeological evidence (Solecki 1950, 1985 and personal communication; Salwen 1962). Therefore no testing is currently recommended in these three areas at this Phase.i However, if this portion, approximately 1600 feet (Figure 9) within the wood, is to be developed in the future„ Phase 11 testing may` be recommended at the appropriate time. For the remainder of the lot which includes the previously plowed field, we recommend a "walkover" and visual inspection at approximately 6 foot intervals. This should be conducted after the field has been freshly plowed and disked. This method would both save time and offer a greater sampling than shovel tasting at 50 foot intervals.-- The ntervals.-The Phase IB survey will indicate presence or absence of prehistoric and/or historic remains in the area north of the fort along Downs Creek, and in the tidal marsh, and in the field, west of the creek. The presence of artifacts might initially verify: - the northern and western boundaries of Fort Corchaug and the west and south boundaries of the Rail Fence Well site 8 C, -the possibility of association between the Fort Corchaug and Rail Fence Well sites - whether or not a Native American village had existed here as previously speculated (Solecki 1950: 211. -the possibility of submerged sites, assuming testing is possible in the marsh - the historic nature of the building remains at the north end of the project area along Main Street - whether other, unrelated, prehistoric or historic sites are also present within the project area. 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY Anonymous 1 BB2 1683 History of Suffolk County, N.Y. W.W. Munsell and Company, New York Booth, Nat E. 1949 The Archaeology of Long Island. In The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader. 1900 to present, Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Volume V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association, N.Y. 1982 Cammisa, Alfred 1984 A Comparison of Settlement Patterns and General Land Use Between the Native Americans and the English Settlers in Southern New England ►n the Seventeenth Century. .Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society 45. Hall, Warren 1974 Boy's "Digging" Now Historic Site. The Suffolk Times March, 21 Ritchie, William A. 1980 The Archaeology of New York. Harbor Hill Books, New York Roberts, William I, IV 1993 personal communication Ross, Peter, L.L.D. 1902 History of Long Island from its Earliest Settlement to the Present Time, Volume 1. Lewis Publishing Co., N.Y. Salwen, Bert 1962 Sea Levels and Archaeology in the Long Island Indians. In The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader. 1900 to Present Reading in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Volume V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association New York, 1982 Schuberth, Christopher J 1968 The Geology of New York City and Environs. New York: Natural History Press 10 Solecki, Ralph S. 1985 Recent Field Inspections of Two Seventeenth Century Indian Forts on Long Island, Fort Massapeag and Corchaug. In The Bulletin and Journal of Archaeology for New York State, Number 91, New York State Archaeological Association 1985 1950 The Archaeological Position of Historic Fort Corchaug, L.I. and its Relation to Contemporary Forts. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut, Number 24 1950 1993 personal communication Thompson, Benjamin F. 1962 History of Long Island from its Discovery and Settlement to the Present Time, Volume 2. Ira J. Friedman, New York Warner, John W. Jr.; W. E. Hanna; R. J. Landry, J.P. Wulforst; J.A. Neeley, R.L. Holmes; and C.E. Rice 1975 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station Wellman, Beth 1993 personal communication Williams, Lorraine 1972 Ft. Shantok and Ft. Corchaug: A Comparative Study of Seventeenth Century Culture Contact in the Long Island Sound Area PhD Dissertation. New York University Microfilms, Ann Arbor Van Diver, Bradford B. 1985 Roadside Geology of New York. Missoula, Montana: Mountain Press Publishing Company 11 MAPS Burr, David H. 1829 Map of Suffolk County, published by the Surveyor General pursuant to an act of the legislature Chace, J. Jr. 1858 Map Of Suffolk County, Long Island from actual surveys published by John Douglas Hyde, E. Belcher 1896,1906 Map of Long Island based on recent U.S. Coast Surveys, together with local maps on file, supplemented by careful territorial observations, Brooklyn, New York Moore, Thomas 1797 Map of the Town of Southold map 2 [of 101 United States Geological Survey 1956 Mattituck Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series Topographic map. 1956 Matt►tuck Hills Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series Topographic map. 1956 Southold Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series Topographic map. 1956 Southampton Quadrangle. 7.5 minute series Topographic map. 12 N, + NII/ 0 29 �50 o 7.. A, 1 , J x St J6 IOU 0,. Cud 1P9U - s7 0 4710 14 Q� Clit.ellogllo Stc BW 10 Sacred-IjPart C OV ('o Fafms-: \\20 V 13 A 27 p D Haywater,� ctitcW Oe PO Cove "0 `,^, ci c. "r<\ 'I '. ��t ••� c+ + 1, r •�`•'' �• 4.'�1� "r� •i•'� '� 40 t 32 ?0 :� 7 `••r `//' SOI, 7.\ G f )' S/jS� �' (�jJr colcl 0.- t I�e < • C U t C It 0 a;. Harbor Horseshoeti Cove. "V, Marsh3 z_ North Fork 13M IIc , tr) Club4 Pt In 25) % ARBOR CUTCHOGUB 11 Not I h I or k ...................... 3 ()(JrItt I1Uh -4 - .J,'{ r;J Or, Project Area boundfl y I New old Cove '�uffolk Yacht Club L 2414 I . • Jt 1 FOLK` SL �� vE Sur OL Ir FNEW, 6 12 fe Kim0%rier 8 Pt • Marlatooka �A,tpod Point 7 N 0 R TIH ACE Matt No 2 (J�1 V') -,f- 7 42 ��\r /n r so SCALE 1:24000 0 I MILE 1 J: 6000 7000 FEET 1000 0 1000 .2000 3000 4000 5000 Standa`r'd� 0 1 KILOMETER Figure 1 The project area shown on the U.S.G.S . map, 7 . 5 minute series Southampton, Southold, Mattituck and Mattituck Hills quadrangle 1956 . PHASE 1B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE BAXTER PROPERTY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: The Maguire Group Inc. 3237 Route 12 Medford, New York 11763 Prepared by: Grecnhonse Consultants Incorporated 40 1"AcIlange Place New York, New York 10005 April 1995 C, TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Listof Plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv List of Participants v Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 FieldTesting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Stratigraphic Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Artifact Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Appendix 1 Survey Record Forms Appendix 2 Artifact Inventory ii C, LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The project area shown on the U.S.G.S. 7.5 ininute series Mattituck, Mattituck Hills, Southampton and Southold quadrangles, 1956. Figure 2 Location of shovel tests, surface finds and structures within the project area. iii C, LIST OF PLATES Plate 1 View of remains of farmhouse looking east (Structure 6 on Figure 2). Plate 2 View of farm outbuilding looking east (Structure 7 on Figure 2). Plate 3 View of abandoned farm equipment looking south from the vicinity of Shovel Test 79. Plate 4 View of remains of rectangular brick foundation looking south (Structure 9 on Figure 2). iv C, LIST OF PERSONNEL William 1. Roberts IV - Principal Investigator Author Alfred G. Cammisa - Field Director Paula M. Crowley - Word Processor Laboratory Director Co-Author Kenneth Richter - Field Supervisor William Goldsmilli - Field Technician Daniel Heim - Field Technician Michael D'Arbanville - Field Technician v C, INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Stage 1B Archaeological Survey is to document the presence and/or absence of potential prehistoric and/or historic archaeological resources within the Baxter project area in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York through the use of physical testing techniques. The project area lies in the southwest part of the Town of Southold on the North Fork of Long Island. The parcel is approximately 105 acres and is bounded on the north by Main Street (Route 25) and on the south by New Suffolk Avenue and on the east by Downs Creek. See Figure 1 for the location of the project area. The Stage IA Archaeological/Historical Sensitivity Evaluation Report on this development concluded that this parcel is the location of two archaeological sites from the prehistoric period. It is also the location of the Contact Period Fort Corchaug and a nineteenth century farmstead. A Stage 113 survey consisting of shovel tests on a 50 foot grid pattern was recommended for all of the project area that will be impacted by the proposed construction (Greenhouse Consulteuits Inc. 1994:8). I C, FIELD TESTING The Stage 1B testing of the Baxter project area took place from August 23 through September 2, 1994. This parcel of approximately 105.6 acres was investigated by excavating shovel tests located on a 100 foot grid pattern or as close as possible to the grid intersections. This strategy was proposed by the Principal Investigator to cover all of the proposed impacts excepting known archaeological site locations. This included lots 1-3; the western portions of lots 4, 8 and 9; lots 10-25; the western portion of lot 26; lots 27-40; the drainage areas west of lots 1 and 19; and J the northern and western parts of the park and recreation area as shown on the Subdivision Sketch Plan of August 16, 1992. Two hundred seven shovel tests were planned, forming a grid covering all of the project area except locations where evidence of filling or the installation of storm sewers could be documented. During the Stage 113 testing of the project area, 198 shovel tests were attempted and excavated,at least partially. Obstacles encountered were piles of rubble and/or fill, occasional boulders, trees, and extremely marshy conditions in a low area to the west of the existing creek. Brambles and other dense undergrowth were encountered especially near the center of the project area. These conditions required the abandonment of eleven tests. The methodology employed for the shovel tests was straight forward. Roughly square tests approximately 1.5 feet across were excavated to a depth of at least two feet, until 0.5 feet of the subsoil was explored, or until the trench was impeded by excessive ground water or impeded by other obstacles. All soils from the shovel tests were screened through 1/4-inch mesh for the recovery of artifacts. Soils were excavated and recorded by natural stratigraphic deposits. For all of the shovel tests, the strata encountered were measured, described, and recorded utilizing the context system. See Appendix 1 for rile original survey record forms. Surface inspection was used in areas of good surface visibility to supplement tl►e shovel testing. This inspection consisted of fairly intensive visual examination by the field crew walking abreast at intervals no greater than len feet through recently plowed fields. All potentially significant artifacts located during this surface collection were then plotted on the project maps. Surface collecting was used in the northern field only. The southern field had not been plowed, and arrangements could not be made to have this done. :) C, S7'RATIGRAPIIIC SUMMARY The 196 shovel tests completed within the Baxter project area can be subdivided into two groups based on the presence or absence of a plowzone. As was expected, the larger group all lie within the presently wooded portion of the property and have no evidence of a plowzone. The smaller group all have plowzones and all lie i6thin the plowed fields forming the western portion of the project area. The smaller group, defined by the presence of a plowzone, consists of Shovel Tests 42, 65, 73 and 183 through 201. Two layers were recorded in all these tests excepting 42, 65, 73 and 199 which had only one layer. The top layer ranged in texture from sandy loam to coarse loamy sand. Sandy loam was most common. Color ranged from dark brown through brown to yellowish brown, with yellowish brown most common. Thickness ranged from 0.8 to 1.4 feet and averaged 1.2 feet. The top layer was interpreted as a plowzone. Below this was the second layer. Its texture was described as compact sand or compact loamy sand. It was consistently yellowish brown in color. The second layer was differentiated from the first on the basis of its somewhat s tidier texture and increase in compaction. The second layer was interpreted as subsoil, being identified as part of the 'B' horizon. See the Suffolk County Soil survey for a discussion of the various soil horizons Garner et al. 1975:100). The larger group consists of the remaining 174 shovel tests. It is defined by the absence of a plowzone. From two to five layers were recorded in these shovel tests. Seven shovel tests had two layers (Shovel Tests 7, 8, 12, 15, 64., 77 and 99). Nineteen shovel tests had four layers (Shovel Tests 13, 14, 16, 21, 23, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 41, 46, 80, 84, 90, 95 and 146). Two shovel tests had five layers (Shovel `Pests 33 and 85). The remaining 146 shovel test had three layers. The top layer consisted of hrnnus with root n►at. Its color was consistently dark brown. Thickness ranged front 0.1 to 0.3 feet and averaged 0.2 feet. It was identified as the "0" horizon. Below this was the second layer which ranged in texture from loam to sandy loam with the latter more common. Color was either dark grayish brown or very dark grayish brown. Thickness ranged from 0.1 to 1.7 feet and averaged 0.4, feet. The second layer tivas identified as the "A" horizon. In most cases the third layer consisted of either compact sand or coarse loamy sand with the latter predon►inating. Color was consistently yellowish brown. It was identified as tl►e "B" horizon. In otdy eight cases was it possible to obtain thickness rneastrerracnts for this layer. In Shovel 'rests 33, 37, 80, 81, 84, 85, 86 .nut 146 this layer was identified was tlae 13, horizon and it B2 horizon was found underneath. 'Thickness ranged froth 0.4 to 2.5 feet and averaged 1.0 feet. In nineteen cases (Shovel 'rests 13, Ill, 16, 21, 23, 28, 30, 31, 32, 339 34-, 36, 38, 41, 46, 74, 85, 90 ►in(l 95) the third layer was it nwttletl eonrbinatiort of the lavers above and below it. Texture ranged fron► loan► to sandy loan► with the latter more cornua►►►. Color was a nwttled 3 C, combination of dark greyish brown and yellowish brown. Thickness ranted from 0.3 to 1.2 feet and averaged 0.4 feet. This layer was identified as the A/B horizon. In shovel tests 33, 37, 80, 81, 84, 85, 86 and 146 another layer beneath the B, horizon was reached. This bottom layer consisted of a yello,-.ish brown compact sandy silt. It was identified as the B2 horizon, the deepest part of the subsoil exposed dnring the testing. The sequence of layers Nvas: 0 horizon, A horizon, B, horizon, and 132 horizon, with nineteen shovel tests having an A/13 horizon between the "A" and "B,". There were three other exceptions. Shovel tests 64 and 99 had no A horizon, having only an 0 horizon above the B horizon. Shovel Test 77 had a fill deposit over a B horizon. 4 C, ARTIFACT SUMMARY All material recovered from the surface survey and sliovel tests were returned to the Greenhouse Laboratory for cleaning and processing. The finds were processed, with non-artifacts being discarded. Once processed, artifacts were labeled with their context numbers and bagged in clean polyethylene bags. The first set of finds processed were from the surface collections. Nine historic finds came from the vicinity of Shovel Test #77. Six prehistoric finds were found in the field. Six surface "finds" were discarded as naturally occurring rock. A total of fifteen artifacts were retained from the surface collections. TABLE 1 SURFACE FINDS HISTORIC Context/Catalo# Description Amount 1077/#1 Glass lid 1 1077/#2 Paneled bottle glass 1 1077/#3 Glass condiment jar 1 1077/#4 Glass strapped flask 1 1077/#5 Horseshoe 1 1077/#6 Horseshoe 1 1077/#7 Ceramic, hotel ware 1 1077/#8 Glass condiment bottle 1 1077/#9 Glass bottle 1 Vicinity of Shovel test #77 5 TABLE 2 SURFACE FINDS PREHISTORIC Context/Catalog# Description Amount 1002/#40 Core 1 Northern field west of Town Park in planned vineyard 1003/#41 Secondary flake 1 Northern field west of Town Park in planned vineyard 1005/#42 Endscraper I Planned buffer between northern field and Town Park 1007/#43 Projectile point 1 West of drainage area in northern field 1010/#44 Projectile point 1 Town Park 1012/#45 Groundstone fragment 1 Northern field west of drainage area TABLE 3 SURFACE FINDS DISCARDED Context/Catalo# Description Amount 1001 Discarded 1004 Discarded 1006 Discarded 1008 Discarded 1009 Discarded 1011 Discarded 6 C, The second set of finds came from 311 shovel tests. A total of 61 historic artifacts were recovered. Prehistoric artifacts were represented by 73 artifacts from sixteen shovel tests. Discarded, naturally occurring material resulted fron► fifteen shovel tests. A total of 134 artifacts were retained from the shovel test phase. TABLE 4 SHOVEL TESTS HISTORIC Context/Catalog # Descriplion Number 3025.01/#55 Porcelain 1 3069.02/#64 White earthenware 1 3076.02/#10 Belt buckle 1 #11 Miscellaneous hardware 1 3077.01/#12 Bottle glass 2 #13 Container glass 1 #14 Container glass 2 #15 Stoneware 1 #16 White graniteware 1 #17 Bottle glass 1 #18 Lightning glass 1 #19 Bottle glass 1 #20 Flat glass 1 #21 Flat glass 1 #22 Bottle glass 1 #23 Container glass 1 #24 White graniteware 1 #25 Porcelain 1 #26 Milk glass 4 #27 Bottle glass 1 #28 Container glass 12 #29 Bottle glass 1 #30 White graniteware 9 #31 Can #32 Sall/pepper shaker cap l #33 Wi►•e 1 #39- Leather 1 7 C, #35 Shell 3 #36 Lamp base 1 #37 Miscellaneous hardNvire 1 #38 Bracket 1 #39 Carbon battery 2 3084.02/#65 Pearlware? 1 Discussion of historic artifacts. Artifacts with datable attributes were found in Contexts 1077 and 3077.01, 3077.01 being the shovel test and 1.077 the surface surrounding the shovel test. Glass artifacts from 1077 include a condiment jar and bottles, all with screw tops. The technology of manufacturing the bottles was by automatic machine made,a process postdating 1904 (Jones and Sullivan 1985:39). One hotelware ceramic sherd was also on the surface with a partial distributor's mark. James M. Shaw and Company of New York, New York sold the products of a number of pottery companies in the United States. The company filed for use of this particular mark on January 3, 1928, having used this mark since 1907 (Lerner 1988:417). The mark reads: "JAMES M. SH.../NEW Y.../VI I'RIF.../MCN... The MCN... probably stood for the D.E. r 11 r McNicol Pottery of East Liverpool, Ohio (1892-1920s) which moved in the 1920s to Clarksburg, West Virginia (1920s-1960s) (Lerner 1988:290-292). Therefore the date of this artifact is anytime from 1907 onward. In Context 307 7.01, two ceramic sherds had datable maker's marks. The Glasgow Pottery Company/John Moses & Company of Trenton, New Jersey produced Catalog #24. The pottery ran from 1859-1906. The mark is dated from 1895-1900 (Kovel and Kovel 1986:11p; Lerner 1988:172-173; DeBolt 1988:33-34). The second sherd was an import from France, manufactured by R. Delinieres & Company, Limoges, France. The mark was used from 1879-1900 (Kovel and Kovel 1986:170a; Thorn 1947:7/#37). The historic artifacts from the Shovel Test 77 and vicinity are represent the early part of the twentieth century, or later. A possible piece of pearlware was found in Context 3084.02. Pearlware was manufactured between 1779-1840 (Brown 1982:5, 1.7-18; South 1972:Figure 1). 8 TABLE 5 SI IOVLL 'I'LS'f5 I'll EI IIS'I'ORI C Context/Catalog # Description Number 3003.02/#46 Charcoal 1 #47 Prehistoric ceramics 6 #48 Primary flakes 2 #49 Secondary flake 1 3013.03/#50 Fire-cracked rock 2 #51 Primary flake 1 3013.04/#52 Fire-cracked rock 1 #53 Biface fragment 1 #54 Secondary flakes 5 3026.02/#56 Primary flake 1 #57 Secondary flakes 2 3033.04/#58 Sidescraper 1 3035.04/#59 Secondary flakes 2 3037.02/#60 Secondary flakes 3 3037.03/#61 Secondary flakes 2 3038.03/#62 Secondary flakes 7 3069.02/#63 Secondary flake 1 3085.03/#66 Core 1 3135.03/#67 Primary flake; 1 3136.02/#68 Primary flake 1 3139.03/#69 Secondary flake-; 1 3141.02/#70 Secondary flakes 8 9 CJ 3141.03/#71 Secondary flakes 15 3142.02/#72 Secondary flake 1 3149.03/#73 Secondary flake 1 3152.02/#74 Secondary flakes 2 3152.03/#75 Secondary flakes 3 Discussion of prehistoric artifacts. The artifacts represent a variety of activities conducted at the Baxter location. Cores, primary and secondary flakes represent the discards of stone tool manufacturing. Two cores, six primaq flakes and 55 secondary flakes were recovered. Groundstone tools and ceramics usually present domestic activities, usually food processing, cooking and storage. One groundstone tool fragment was found and six cerau►ic sherds. Endscrapers and sidescrapers are used for meat and hide processing. One endscraper and one sidescraper were found at Baxter. All of the stone tpols were composed of quartz. Two projectile points and oneIn-progres/wer ecovered, the two points from the surface and the biface/preform front a shovdl test. The olete point found on the surface in the Town Park is made of quartz in the narrow-bladedd tradition of Long Island. Within this complex are the generally similar points called Lamoka, Bare Island, Wading River and Squibnocket Stemmed (Wisniewski and Gwynu►e 1982). This style is associated with tike Late Archaic period, 3500-2000 B.C. (Ritchie 1971: 29, 126, 131; Fogelman 1988:54). The second projectile point found on the surface west of the drainage arca► in the northern field is of the suue style only it is made from grey chert, the only no►►-quartz artifact in the assemblage. It is broken and missing its stein. The third artifact required overall thinning and one sten► side to be completed ink order for it to be a finished artifact. The distal end of the blade was broken. The preform/biface would have been a Broad Stemmed Corner-notched point, a style associated with the Late Archaic on Long Island (Wisniewski and Gwynne 1982; Ritchie 1959). The information front the stone tools indicates a Late Archaic occupatiok►, �Nlule the pottery is indicative of a'1'ern►ival/Transitional/woodland occupation. Prehistorically, this site complex saw multiple occupancies over ti►uc. 10 Ci TABLE 6 SI IOV EL '1,ES'1'S DISCARDED Context/Catalog # Description Number 3036.03 Discarded 3039.02 Discarded 3039.03 Discarded 3040.03 Discarded 4046.02 Discarded 3050.-- Discarded 3069.03 Discarded 30£31.02 Discarded 3134.03 Discarded 3137.03 Discarded 3143.03 Discarded 3145.03 Discarded 3176.03 Discarded 3179.03 Discarded 3185.01 Discarded 3190.01 Discarded II C, RESULTS A total of 70 historic artifacts and 79 prel►istoric artifacts were recovered from the Phase 113 archaeological testing. These finds represent one historic site and four prehistoric sites. Historic artifacts were recovered from one surface location and five shovel tests. All these locations fall within the proposed Town Park. All these locations, excepting Shovel Test 25, lie within the northeastern portion of the park. This is the general location of the nineteenth century farmstead discussed in the Phase I report (Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1994:6-8),and the ruins of farm structures observed in the field. Date ranges of the artifacts recovered indicate the use of this location during the early years of the twentieth century, probably as a dump for the farm. The farm may have originated during the mid-nineteenth century, as structures are shown at the location by 1858 (lbid.: Figure 6). Since this farmstead site is within the proposed Town Park, no impacts are currently planned. Prehistoric artifacts were recovered from six surface collection locations as well as sixteen of the 196 shovel tests completed, including Shovel Tests 3, 13, 26, 33, 35, 37, 38, 69, 85, 135, 136, 139, 141, 142, 149 and 152. "These specific locations fall into four general areas now being considered prehistoric sites. Two of these are the previously reported Fort Corchaug and Fence Rail Well Sites, while the other two are new sites. The Fort Corchaug Site is located entirely within the proposed Town Park. The artifacts from the Fort Corchaug Site include the biface/ preform and the prehistoric ceramics. A date range of Late Archaic through Contact is indicated based on this survey and previous work (Solecki 1950, 1985). Since the Fort Corchaug Site is within the proposed Town Park no impacts are currently planned. The Fence Rail Well Site is located within Lots4 through 10 and 16 of the Major Subdivision. No diagnostic artifacts were recovered from this site during this survey. Previous work on this site indicated a date range of Transitional through Contact periods (Greenhouse Consultants Incorporated 1994:3). This site is likely to be_iirlp.acted by_the proposed houses, roads, z = driveways and service connections anticipated as part of tile Major Subdivision. J The more southerly of the two new prehistoric sites is located within the proposed 'Town Park. No diagnostic artifacts were recovered front this site which lies over 400 feet north of Fort a Corchaug. Since this site is located within lite Town Park, no impacts are anlicipated. The northern new prehistoric site is located partially within the proposed Town Park and partial within Lot l of the Miuor Subdivision. Artifacts rCCOVCI'ed fI•oil, lll►s site include a narrow-bladed stemmed projectile point, so a date range including the Late Archaic period is indicated. 'Phis site is located to lite soup► and southwest of the historic farmstead. Pile n►.►jorily of the site is within the Town Park where; ►►o iunpacls are anticipated, however tl►e western portion of the site 12 C, falls within Lot I. Lot 1 is planned as a Vineyard, and has one possible future Louse location. This house location could i►npr<u,t this site;. 13 C, CONCLUSIONS AND RECO5151ENDATIONS It is our conclusion that the four prehistoric and one historic archaeological sites are located within the Baxter project area. The historic site and two of the prehistoric sites lie within the proposed Town Park. No impacts are expected to these sites. It is our rcconuneudation that these three sites, the historic farr►►stead, Fort Corchang, and the new southern prehistoric site be preserved by avoiding impacts to thein. The current plans for the project area include no impacts to the sites. Should the Town of Southold develop this park, additional work on these sites may be needed. The Fence Rail Well prehistoric site is located within Lots 4-10 and 16 of the proposed Major Subdivision. We recommend that a Phase 2 Archaeological Survey of this site be undertaken prior to any development of these lots. This survey would determine the precise boundaries of the site as well as potential National Register eligibility. The site would then be avoided by the new construction, or excavated to recover the information it contains prior to the beginning of construction. ti The northern new prehistoric site is partially located within Lot 1 of the proposed Minor Subdivision. A possible future house site shown within Lot 1 would impact this site. We recommend a Phase 2 archaeological survey of this site should the new house plans proceed. This survey should be completed prior to development of Lot I. If Lot 1 is used entirely as a vineyard, then this would be a continuation of the agricultural use of this land, and would not be considered a new impact. 14 Ci 131 RLI OCR'A Pi IY Brown, Ann 1982 Historic ceramic typology with principal dates of manufacture and descriptive characteristics for idnetification. Prepared for Delaware Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Location and Environmental Studies Office. DeBolt, C. Gerald 1988 The Dictionary of Anterica►t Pottery Dlarks: Whiteware and Porcelain. Rutland, Vermont: Charles C. "Tuttle Company. Fogelman, Gary L. 1988 .4 Projectile Point Tt pology for Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Turbotville, Pennsylvania: Fogelman Publishing Company. Jones, Olive and Catherine Sullivan 1985 The Parks Canada Glass Glossary for the Description of Containers, Tableware, Flat Glass, and Closures. Oltawa: National Historic Parks and Sites Branch, Parks Canada. Kovel, Ralph and Terry Kovel 1986 hovels' Nero Dictionary tf Alarks: Pottery & Porcelain 1850 to the Present. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc. Lerner, Lois 1988 Lehner's Encyclopedia of U.S. !)larks on Pottery, Porcelain & Clay. Paducah, Kentucky: Collector Books, Schroeder Publishing Company, Inc. Ritchie, William A. 1959 "I'he Stony Brook Site and Its Relation to Archaic and "Transitional Cultures on Long Island. New York State Museum anal Science Service 13►tlleti►t 372. Albany, New York. 1971 A Typology and Nomenclature for New fork Projectile Points. A'e)v fork State Museum Bulletin. 384. Revised edition. Albany, New York. 15 South, Stanley 1972 Evolution and horizon as revealed in ceramic analysis in hislorical archeolog}'. 77te Conference on Historic Site Arc•haeolog}' Papers, 1971, 6 (1): 71-116. Thorn, C. Jordan 1947 Handbook of Old Pottery & Porcelain. Marks. New York-: Tudor Publishing Company. Wisniewski, Stanley and Gretchen A. Gwynne 1982 The Tiger Lily Site, Long Island, New York: a preliminary report. The Bulletin of the New York State Archeological Association 84:1-17. 16 29 \\\\ / o• /• \� 50 _ "� ''Ppo • \ \\��.\ � .n 56'x[ 1 / ` �'\�a\1� `� �R\ .r• `SIO Com f >�'' .. `27 i a o 96 P• • 40tQq . ' �\ n \ \ -� i 21•, s o S'— .�° , 0 6730 ' \ ��' .� \��l, � /\ _ � ,rpt• � ''\' _ �c j�:�''��•!� ,;( - �,• (� h• ) rY., G it la `J. \ BM \ �'/ 1° ' • Sacred flearl` ye 2 �pP t l SFA ;1 i lo`' _ 9 t rn; \`tet✓ OT . \ \�� •24 .., o.. 7 \ ci & SLI SO � � ` � )� ��:%�,. 1 �`-��"')� �� .�\ t \Farms.; 20 r ..,E" \ / / • •\ - l `•` w 1 }• \\l \\�d0 , I '1 j,. F •\- - �1\ :\ (J �:'; � _ � tel, )�.�� � � 1 �F '�l •�':�:���_._-��`�- ',_,._ : � :�` � �,; •�,, � _ Cu cho¢Rue �•..< �` o .O \ 1 0_, �• •(R -\.."91St'.i,27 Cutch) e / ;Op,,� - �\o\\`\ .•J (...`0\ ''' ' b`4'Y U ryyG•:,+� . ! •�� \ ` '"r•',, I� .9 �.; , t�1,\\ 1;``'•,,.�1 r`;•� I` ,•\ ,�\ �\ \ \ '�j: C„�J"'r •\��+y \/ B20 i I I �t•a X50 ),.11 •/ G/ ).:s"'.... jsher b/ �'. \ ); v / •��\• ) Cutcho,que "ao Harbor „ I• Horseshoe\: - \' v� �, ^/'c�\ -^!,_.�'� \ \ \ i •o No th Fork \ t� BM ,; 'tt'� Marsh z i Cone, C. p �'�..1 L ,li \�.' l \ 20'•� b r p Co nti C ) 4 1 :� Pt •v i \ y, 1 _ �'1 1`ems 25 ,e .n / f I',� 1n �° •, . \ BM o ) . C UTC11 UG C T 11211 - - � 3 � I , 1 rz o` 325 N o r l h Fork 3,;,,,,;;;;;,,,;,;;,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,'�,: •!t -l•t'' s 3/ Counu Club °� r /I )r'l 0 it ,Ir, ; oIjArea $oundiyProject t p ld:Cove 0: 'Suffolk r l '.1-acht Club /0 o` 1 1 •I• .�IxD• SIIFFI '`•,..rt .y-�_u``�� \.�\_74II`.qgi,• Iq2a 9,K 15 NEW\,�.IlIl .•.. wUl_ OLK i l •� (/1 - ~• '.:Av i_=•1I`;11 .1r�Iw�`t:al•B; r \I ANE. ..'. t_ -n 6I /9 12 M�1� � � ,li)' •I'�r�' ' ) 1 I \ iii I I �,.';Is.. .. :.. p ener �y)t� . :`•--`,I� ._ � _ 0 r- Kim '. 7 l• - _ 8 ' l 30.x.,:_ I\ �j.,• .•\._ORS *Pt 0 �T-) \\• Marratooka S•-' O U ( l 23 Point r9• %,i"c apo 0 o I NpI� 7 .H ACL' 0III, Matt No 2 , i � f• 1 10 A it - SCALE 1.24000 1 MILE 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET 5 0 1 KILOMETER I Standard', Figure 1 The project area shown on the U.S.G.S. map, 7 . 5 minute series Southampton, Southold, Mattituck and Mattituck Hills quadrangle 1956 . " f —moi •� r'r' 1 : S �es '�'�` �� Tv -10 Ir 1 p r.� i +♦ - �� �" '�1 / 1- :Z4 jyr 71 - ... , ,v�. / `.•lam _�� i •-4F .tt. ,\rt"c�{tib � + ..1••��'f- � ��"�,' �'� �7i y r' y"ice. JJaa 1` ��• }rte -�� -�. few J F _ r U-34 M _ S\_ r APPENDIX I FIELD RECORD SHEETS is SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT COORDINATES PROJECT f —.,:` COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR:' SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TOPE AND NO. s AND NO. : STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT, N07ZS NC•Vi J 1 c.� t-ti 2 CA 44 6OArte j q 1,� COAr5t SAND /0 P�6, yOR:�°A I a ? y-P2C P-� 11'� )�� IAC.✓ 4 S 6 7 8 • Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil ssmplu are taken.) s � b � f)'dA/1oA/ eneral Notes : (Nae II cult,nuurl+l reuhied,and It toll samples a(#tskut.) A/P�tPes� vA;l� � Clee�� C/Ant Sl��l l ��-4L d Til A-r h3o,-r Z, De r# Cross Wit ou Refs ; Plan Photos Ian \ Photos Section Notebook :orlon Notebook ,1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : 13AYf�P COORDINATES ' PROJECT �R?r7"�1Q COORDINATES /Nerf 7SITESUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENEDT DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENEDT DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. A c D N ;3 /z3�'y sr AC KA AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH DESCRIPTION COLOR rULT.MAT Nams f't t7 M t / i� V 1 0.0 �p•y `{uMA.a w�R..T—,yy Ncn o/rrrso.J 2 L w • L—. 6 Lo^ih" COAfle t 4�1 CQ(Ante IrNR L( ! 211i my�e y/:_ 1 FFP/jCr[ 2 O. 1 IO,•µ• C•Mf.SN SA.1� NCM R Hp'i1 CON 3 C _ 36 oArtt SaNpCPtAMif. ITN 6 pet, Z.J -l,r c..►.,-s i S e�-! NG.vs 4 t S 6 7 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground surface General Nous : (Note if cult.material roulned,and If soil samples are Olsen.) rr ST3 It 1/I4 rn Z j W%/< A v0 ITff/C M4Y!P C NsY enenl Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) P,e(-2 LI/ /lAit M (Y/r1 FOVhO , /30%N rT f O Zirseh. Cross Refs s oss Refs Plan Photos in Photos Section Notebook � [tion Notebook S ;yr i als; IN B HorteoN i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger`roles,Shovel tests i PROJECT PROJECT COORDINATES COORDINATES 1 hX-k IL SITE SUPERVISOR: SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE : TEST TYPE EXCAVATOR: SCREENED DATE: �,/ TEST TYPE ^ AND NO. A L N /M� ,/C! /r / '3/`// AND NO. : R C _ Z K�JMD �y�r �23�yN Si S^ Sf� STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH a DESCRIPTION COLOR f,ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH a DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0,0/- 0.)" �1NMAS W/Cw!'w�r NCwi O koclsoa 1 p 0 r_�•�r �-A-AO w/Rwr M..T /Jt.p 0 f(a cs?a J 2 6.5�- /,5 leRnw cvao6.Nrtt to vg.VZ NCan A ploMtp y t��Z wNar t tv 3 ' G�u�4c hJ e.w woC 3 y 9 �+ �ccl crwwsC Iv f - : �•� - •'�" )o y ti f�L r1 GM �� ' •-1F ""P'�..ta b 4 4 S S S S l I Give depths relative to around surface Give depths relative to around surface ;eneral Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) ;eneral Notes (Note if cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.)2 s .jr ,S�e�d A1 'J-O� T' %opr ed w-1 S rots Ref rose Refs : Ian - Photos Ian Photos ectlan Notebook sctlon Notebook i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I 1 I PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT : COORDINATES ro"EwsT of k.roe..r QpxrF 2 SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE FSITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYE AND NOAND NO. : AL Kn/MD �/y p/23/9y sTs7?STRATIGRAPHY APHY,: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES �t1A�+d Ji Re»7 •sFT /1Gr? O He.cr iw> 1 �.Or-0•`(� {'lumgtw�le.r�M►T NGm. t7 �.ss2aJ' ? 0'0'—OrL j O u' ' w, y/L M—E& o,GJ 3 a s s 5 5 7 7 1 S Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface ;eneral Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) sloe 4t z. Sfe/mer i.y rots Refs : Cross Refs : i I IanPhotos Photos Plan I 'ction Notebook Section Notebook i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT bRtrYt..` COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR' SCREENED 7 DATE: TEST TYPE C D O. SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 7 DATE: TEST �� TYPE > I AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT,MAT. NOTES N c 7 0,0(..011;", � 2 _ G• `� NG h JAM l.lIAPS¢Saup IOu Y q �. ) C NI r RI=a++ .� c.^tl �j'``// ,r, A hfe.e.t aoN / 2 0.5 jA 3 10— (eArSe SNNO 10 r 51d ( M (3 Pon s� 3 4 4 S S 6 I 6 7 � 7 S I I g i •Glve depths relative to ground surface i General Nous : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) 'Give depths relative to ground surface /V& [" /r"POL /vrcvrlr"n r General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) S,v,�!( (LMaJNY OF ed /A i Cross Rafs Cross Refs plan Photos I Plan Photos [Section Notebook -- Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests • i PROJECT : YT-..2 iZ COORDINATES : PROJECT : Qh_ COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TESTTYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: rCAVATOR: SCREENEDt DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : ANO NO.� /,gyp vti" a (zs/yy s7/L STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES Al JC- 2 N tir 1 O.or•O G �cv✓',ra •s�rwTiw ltlGl �Na eta J LoAnly Cahn?Svnn r4 �+ N( M /� l{7I/ao.� 1 i 0141. ? rosr..tt tO*--*se.aa. Ie Y�-'1/ t44—*1 R NORI jo.J CoArte Snap (iln 4 4 S i S 6 6 7 7 s g I 'Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to{round surface Gansral Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) J�j.7Sr // �!J/,i e(N Ad- C v l7(/r� �+�tu P'�✓,a(. � S�•PP�d 4+ 1.� St�/h•'l ,'Jar TC G�1:4.PG IS /'L•✓hA /h SCrQCN, Goss Refs : Goss Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section � � Notebook _ I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests • i PROJECT : COORDINATES :ST l.c ,a wAt: r'.0" PROJECT : a COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR'. SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: r717 : SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. / �Ias4AND NO. g-/p M� %y�r. $ /23gt� STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY.: ' LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR p gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0.0 0•� lt4Nu-s w/r�a�1•.r+.T NC-M /f••ui•J 1 /y-/�I I IOy 2 e.y/z ntao J Z �O.S� 000STP9VtN bd��Z // F�I6frdN n O.�j - Car's CJA•a£ nJL 1 0.�: I I' sn�d round r a..--#v Ares o,,r.a ��8 boa ancdy LCn. r �L ( 15��X er Z" 51 (O Y n S/A 4,64-1 W, 4 Ja lw..f Ho'�IIo.J g /- /'& I.('• Z co�oe s�� Pa Isle icx. C'G+arse�grty '40 r/?c S i 3 g 6 7 7 g g •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Ar 56pP.d Crow Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Season { Notebook Section i Notebook ir SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau PROJECT : COORDINATES : 4 PROJECT : Qaxl.,.�� COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXKCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE L AND NO. AND �E r2�µ➢ lv" a�23/yN � sr/s— 77 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.s LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I t 'o'er 0.4' tiu++.S.JlaeorMaT- NcM D Hd-wl; i � O�•�- I') t7 M I C /� A)C/4 G _ �.G'- ��F )•'~ ' c... L S&W4 If-f .'O- plc.-- A Nd-,Eoj = 1,2- •l AV IOAM 7/.4 J`// �/1'1 /U/3 Wo,l L 3 ' . •y` /„ �' n lore /0Yr 4 i ` /- 6, • bp.1 L, >v lC r S r /V C M lS'rNoni . s s • 6 6 7 7 d i 8 • Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note if cult.maovlal retained,and If soil samples are taken.) Genera!Nous (Note if wit.material repined,and If soil samples are taken.) CZuswj"z �t?13;3/?s / ja//otlic.0 rn AJa.JcR�' N� C v/TVr•.G /t.r�rl�..0 Cross Rafs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos • Section Notebook Section I Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests 1 PROJECT : COORDINATES 3PROJECT : COORDINATES: � f5a ! SITE: SUPERVISOR: SITE 7y1rA-7,M7 : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE j:KILIMD l/y " df2, AND N0. AND N0. Jg1 ND i7 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,t a ' LAYER DEPTH• LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES i I Q.Dr' 0.2 �u�IRt 4 :k:vJ �Yr AGM 0t/ovsol I 0,0 0.btian.3 4, teor..t„:r' r � = D•2 — 0•$ loy,c y/Z0lr' D.G� Se,t I°f"-Y/ Mcm A NotilaPw (o+w aL.y a �� pI M 13 D.S IOM SM'.) D Joyt t�� ^:�^^ p /T•o�rAN Q,� — 7 li Sasd I0 4w'/� NSM g (�en,i.a 6 6 7 7 g I i • I • Give depths relative to ground surface , •Give depths relative to ground surface Gsneral Nato (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples arc taken.) j General Notes : (Note If cult.material roulned,and if Sail Samples are taken.) Cross Raft Cross Raft PlanPhotos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section j Notebook I � SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT :-17 1r COORDINATES :�Stj Iq PROJECT : Ba�c� COORDINATES I SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXGVA OR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE AND N0. % �Iblw AND NO. : ^L I P4- I/�I` 113I4H D O. STRATIGRAPHY.: ' STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES I 1 0,0'-o•t �+w�^sb rt-.t n,T NL 1 ♦ ^ r roe 2loo V12, = 7 / lL'�P /� 11 zan a 3 p,j - ?t lerr.w1 6n.+d ��ka 5� rel C,A.1 I• 4 4 S S. 6 E T I 7 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Glee depths relative to ground surface General Nous : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nota : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) K/G��7Gn COA411 5 SMQ�I(P—l '1 VT I/s7 Cross Refs : Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos . I Section Notebook Section , Notebook i i J ' SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger hole,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; 3 � COORDINATES ; SITE: SUPERVISOR: PROJECT: EXGYATOR: SCREENED 7 DATE: TEST TYPE COORDINATES'r' • /� I AND NO. SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED 1 OATS t TEST TYPE AC rG/�H /4 a/��/� S/ �/ I AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: • ST ZZ LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLORSTRATIGRAPHY,t CULT,MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES HSM /C � Nc M O , 1 - .y /0 ,ala = Koe.tro,J A,,I, IOAM NoniZo,1 Nc,h a.2 _o,�' sea to roKzy/c. ' •y - . s S�\ , IoM 10 �y � � N c i 1 ^l/3 /-/o e r11,, 4 '- to A M y S vtip /4 n S T' N � 4 S 'i S 6 , ' 6 7 7 8 D Give depths relative to ground surface General Notnr; (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil simples are taken,) 'Give depths relative to ground surface }M4 I.-6—e if J") Q General Note : (Note If cult.madrlal regained,ned,and if samples are taken.) !�0 2rtpn , N O C '•v.w,P l/ /i �� /l,fa.�e•ra.V Cross Refs - Cron Refs Plan s Photos plan Photos Section I Notebook • I Section I Notebook I i - SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau I PROJECT ; c� COORDINATES S ,7 PROJECT t ��} COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE; TEST TYPE AND NO. Jc � � g12,3A AND NO. J( ✓ 5/` S i z lQ L k'n-�1�IJP I/y�' S 113,1 v sr i H STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.t LAYER I DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9-ULT.MAT. NOTES U-U C JM,I L 0. I 1 0/'O.3' eeot M4T FrG 0 Honr ie..1 7 Jan% 10 IA?Ile i1/ nro q 3 4 jW1/OrtM b�rd�cl � c, O,� ? /ok., SnaJ IOa('� f� ✓C,r �t/otit�aJ 4 9 / LeQ k7 4 lO�r s/� Hbrilo t 3 I S S 6 6 7 T 8 , g •Give depths relative to ground surface e Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes 6: (Note If cult.material retained, d if toil tamplef re taken.) General Notes s (Note If cult.material rcgined,and if soil samples are taken.) (JntctjJ U (C '1>r 11 � CILonS ���j Goss Refs : Cross Refs s r t _ Plan' Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook i i . SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tats i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holo,Shove!testi I PROJECT : A COORDINATES PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED Z DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE I � AND NO, r R�/n� ^ AND NO. AG ��(r�D Ik P123/14 sTZs STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY ' LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 O,(] - O,1' �NM'�3.L Co.T MVT Ge-t '- 0 H- 4.4 I V/{�1- •� P U NI I G )C C) M. 2 0,2'- o,G' S�. (ee,.. b1K Y/L /JcM A rfo,%a..) 2 rq � to AM �da�Tz I 2 o,r - ? t'r�h 5,,d �'y►r $/i nI�M 6 �eoa ' SAND 4 4 S S i 6 6 7 7 g g •Give depths relative to ground surface " •Give depths relative to ground surface General News : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) C,[mcnlldNosh (Nota If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) ` IU �/�� 1 (/ ? A,(� p,J awr' L ,/ / �r lmdr.7 L7 AV )/_ / V a JH /1 HIRr}Oiv a /Lo�S 9� ►YLvZIs r/I/ �R�rRQ /�w[7 /[A. Cross Refs : Crou Refs ; Plan Photos Plan Photos Sation 1 Notebook Sectlon Notebook 1 I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; ,_ COORDINATES PROJECT : l _q r COORDINATES : QST T n n SITE : SUPERVISOR: TEXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENEDT DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO.�/�,� �/y`� p �Zs�y:, sr z�- � •�� ��(/B�- NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: i STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR I ;ULT.MAT. I NOTES 0 d 0 0't) ' 0.1 �M,:: a rbrir•- I �{ U M1r,f I 0 r(D.II 2U N 210 t 2 C i - Q'`t 4Rdy Lad.rn p/� L i r:zan 1,0� Pr-"-1 le,.,'+ Y yy rJCM 9 }{�:oa I.0�- ? SR,Jd toirg- 'j&^I 3 kt,z ° oSa!.; a .d- OA(o�lrJr—Za�of�L^i4 4 8 - (•3 4 oa-y Coty-Oc wr• �d 3 ori:on S S 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes • (Nota If alt.material retained,and If toil ssmpla are taken.) Vo r eul��ia� bl4lrci i l G��� /rte4clr�� fro �rONuscn . Goa Refs ° Cross Refs Plan Photos i Plan Photos . r Section , Notebook, i Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau C SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i I PROJECT : DHXT�K� COORDINATES : �� SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE i PROJECT COORDINATES AND NO. : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE 812-11 jq 29 ,c- � r , ��zd�/ AND NO. • St3o STRATIGRAPHY.: 1 LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES STRATIGRAPHY i LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES IJ G v D KYM 1 J ad- Z. 4lunt.I t O Y r � Com-� (�cE Io y� I , 0.3 - o c !e" S4-+J ' �,�M a }Ge,r. i 2 0.z 0 s Jvd., /Cart, 1C./c4/z S o �• 7,f• .SANd7 1•— N ISG/"`. V /'{ I I S 0,5-C q � I�NO o1A.0 3 wr►-7rtr A l3 • 4 (Tome Cl«. 4 Ww�tyCoaFSe,94e.o1 bvl.,Ct/g con�¢gl•/12.��ion S S 6 6 7 i 7 8 , g •Give depths relative to ground wrfacs •Give depths relative to ground S"cs General Now (Note if cult.material repined,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nous (Note If cult,mte arial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) f ✓t✓7-3 a4AMOJ � ,�1� StMtP roofs /Jo G1J�c.Q���oYonc s Crop Refs _ Goss Refs Plan Photos s Plan Photos Section Notebook i Sealon ` Notebook i Z_/ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests �� SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROIECT : 3,4�+ COORDINATES PROJECT : X`ro R COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE MQ ,IA rl $hill �C AND NO. �(, ( p 2�/ AND NO. sr �! C- P4 a� 32 STRATIGRAPHY: STRATIGRAPHY.t LAYER I OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES 1 O.Oi-0.Lr k-_4 & K<wf NC n o YUMrC O 2 6.L .0 5 lo. s .al 4 r(o..a.,J 2 1 ^ 1 r✓C. rr t�`�C �AA70 �OI{rt'1 ��y Y 2 A (r1.t/rOI� loy,..`J�L OYI ( 7 q' (•.. .L �wi r amara+„ �e v� r�6 NoManJ 7 �(I _1,q I 44 f 5t6�-�•4 S0 tOY ire )Gti a KoM�o� 4 r I•��1 � L OAn.t CiA�S2 �AM �1(.r S/d •� � I ZOh 6 ! I 6 T 1 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface i •Give depths relative to around surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and If ail samples are taken.) L/uvdr aF /�.vr� i4 vo Sod+¢ Cp»,er,To L�oA,se Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : wr/r COORDINATES : PROJECT : f COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: rCAVATORI SCREE ED 7 DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. l611-1�1 AND NO. : 4 c t<>e/^�D hrK �lly�gy a T 3 3 15-1,34 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES 0.0, O•Z t)-7 t C UG e.z J{vnus ,.low 0 1 M 2 e.t' r$",( 1.n".. Id 4 Y�`. NG,I A A. a 2 Z_V 6 10/I L A)c 13-t (161)cap� 4"d—,4c— a.y'- 04' s �� Nem h16",, 3 b 0 G 1.( �4 rf saj. l71S t j�. Z Grrts6 ror•-� (oy. 6' �'6" �l aM1 ) K.,.�a �y Ccxt. s$a� lal�5� )C,G^ d�ar zaa i S 1•a '.3?�Ij ' Gomm$& sn.+b lo,(a. 4y>L«W 6 X11 S 6 6 7 7 8 � • i g i• •Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Note (Note If cult.materhah retained,and if soil samples are taken.) P•{pIble_asra(re -4—A.A+ 166 General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) 6G C++t..,y (o7 d'.-p, p c�-R,j/�/-•rAJQ�g P rIMAf � Cn � TCC�bS(t K00� y 1C�0!�Q4oc:�. Goss Refs : I Cross Refs I r _ ' r Plan Photos Plan Photos •1 Satlon l` Notebook Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tats PROJECT : k7s1�— COORDINATES : PROJECT COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: AND NO. SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE L I} K��M / /. /� AND NO, F/S STRATIGRAPHY, (�Y n STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER I DEPTH• DESCRI PTIO N COLOR ;ULT.MAT. `yNOTES 1 LAYER I DEPTH• I DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT, NOTES ' i0 -V�2 .Me� ♦ •`+1 ML�r NC41% i I jf 0 Z 0,?,- .L- 04' D y ecu^.` /e f.cZ VC4, 2 saw��� -2 '. SRND 16A r• `f� NC M 3 .'� "+`'�' 6 Ibct?d 3pp /On./o/ 1to LL /� F1/I'i�l SA,,4 C�Uke't2 I �a'lQ A/6 4 I 1 4 �.8 -1.3 lfoAffE T-0 IoAM 10 t /�lM s I . ! s 6 I 6 7 I 7 8 a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to pound surface General Nous : (Note If cult.matvisl reained,and if soil samples are taken.) 7' General Notes : (Note if cult.material retained,and if[oil tampla e taken.) -IF Stay/wa A'` 3 / dL,,crf i SQoa.ry y'h nni. G/a�t7. �{��✓v/wl yr.welF /r( PcnpMe ao'l % 4,04771 �av-eT Crou Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos j Plan Photos Section : Notebook Section i Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests f PROJECT : ('inn�L COORDINATES i PROJECT : COORDINATES �p SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE] TEST TYPE ANO NO. g/ AND NO. 11 );V-/rtp r�y •• �/2 y��y ST3 2 c 5C AND d T 32:( STRATIGRAPHY: T STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR 91.1 LT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR (ULT.MAT. NOTES a0-O.L etuM c fro rz0„ 3 Rr� -�,s t .�-t�r AlCnn 9 f+ervw� 1 C • '-2 O,y Sa.J ff.44--9-> «.,. 2 0 t- 0 fi dtoad ID✓T d�Z NcM A 3 9 ��3.y� Gnaw.s� bn..,,1 5+.� /eye.f/ fl Se<.d,"r Q' /b•,jv� 3 Co4n.� YQac� �af� BwJ�znA@�es r 4 3•`t'- ZE CoaraG s+ /o Y' ��l Ncsn (�z t�s+.,soa 4 (�- 3.Z �022� � �ae� 0✓r� / s s / 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to around surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) General Nota : (Note /IIf cult.material retained,and If toil samples are taken.) Jfi p ni- y./' llvw✓t a//.)/ibuaa�/rte W4 4h8 /]h i✓or)r- >, vZa re q,V pc[+hA/r/7 •�VCYrCr'� r`�Pg t/�fL'.uJ.r� F�Q�� J Pf!M417 ��CO��. � '�S. f / 4 Crou(lets : Cross Rafs t �c06 Q $/g@ r raol V N�t/ir Plan Photos Plan Photos Section ( Notebook Section I Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tats PROJECT: Q/hY--,t/L COORDINATES PROJECT ; 3A COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR t EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE 4 L �2 /17l f '/4 lH/`I AND NO. : R L J�12�MD y4t U 9/ay/g� ANO0 / y 5, 3� ,� STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLORsULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES I ' T O.O"-0.1� kwti.o V wT..,.,r NGM O Nors+yq.✓ I t7,0 —(,' ,2" l..w.s W/fsis hy'f t�Gr'1 � Ni•f.so� 2 b2��OR $+tIJ7 fe�.+� Ottty/. #'s�At�jJ q 1�0,,aNJ 2 .t 0"t' cs�� toye-y(L 3 ! 7 roc 7 M.+ lb*-, (Oafs.rh !s.(e.!/1r.7 o,y I J 9 A 4-j lot Pr+ 8 N6-7OL'� # s.� `� H gHetilao� I 4 4 S S 6 I 6 7 I 7 8 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nous (Note If alt,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Nos If wit material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) �- rr� Cross R03 Cross Refs s Plan Phom Plan Photos Section Notebook mon 1 Notebook I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau PROJECT : l�gvTER COORDINATES : PROJECT : X`/��K COORDINATES I SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE I SUPERVISOR t EXCAVATOR i SCREENED I DATE i TEST TYPE AND NO. f}G �Rl s J2NI9Y ST>ty Ac CSG-��H y4 Y/yl9y A ND NO, 11gt' STy/ STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I i LAYER DEITH• DESCRIPTION COLOR s gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYL0. DLPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0.0 —� + sgJ•ly Ja�.t I0t(L31} NGr^ �� Houso� 1 O_ '1 y / O 1 a ✓ M t( ^ �fiJ 2 2 .a- 1.2 Lo Am SAND 10,4IV,, H 3 mo y'l 7 �d 1 r�p 4 4 1.Q '..3 VARSe SAsvo V ens 10-1r 511 CAi 1-3 s s 7 7 g g • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Nota If cult.matvlal retained,and If toll samples are taken.) General Nona I (Note If cult.materlsl ratalned,and If soil samples are taken.) Sf.P�J '-+ 10/ G(.+.re...+s ,$I1v1// q( 7 vQ1S p,,,v4,r !N /4/3 T/3 ��OK�Lo�✓S '�'�'A 15 ,n.ru+l.� M,rJL KP as Wec:J..s y rdwT -facry C�-✓laN�� l Crou Refs : Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook ' i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT: ply+� COORDINATES PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVA OR: SCREENED? �TZ YP : TEST TE F}L KR M ( It 912 AND NO, AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,s LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 91ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• r(DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES Jn17 Cvn I C.0 � O.L A V M,•�f. .gyp T.'te'1 � io I T 2 0.7.'_ 1,N� G�+wa roxM' 1'> A`/tr �cM A Ifaueo) _ �rO 6 '^'gd7l0a2i my'Aq CA ^ Jt /l�/, �>2oao1 s /,u - ?Y 54.4; to.m Id4JL.s/t dcM 6 t{.ti:r.1 a Z 6 Cao t�anJyl�� 'D•Fr . +I 4 I 4 6 ti 7 7 g a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground s"ce Goa"Notes : (Note If cult.martial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Genstal Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) ShPped K( Z 5� P'Ian� GCc�Q�S Cron Refs ! Cross Rets I Plan Photos Pun Photos Section ` Notebook I Section Notebook I :IeognoN I` uolms i :I004noN uolast Smoyd utld i lm04d :nld SIM n (w:ln sn saldum lies 11 Put PsulnsJ Ielmutiu'Sim P&SON) : MON"UPOw n sn ss Pos dum £t •1k r+�T,� (' �1 I 1. )1 Put'psuina!Rlmei:+'71m/l uoN) Snorl Iusw7 aseyns punaf o:s,gtelsi Unclop SAID• satynt Punaf m sepelsi lyldsp ss1D • ' 4 IP L � 9 � s i t � t bpi �S 1 va "°"I`5 as o b•� . t•� ucz,roy �f bI �+wv� •oN� 2 77 _ j bl aP/) k,4# J t r arr�+N * 1 r�N 7/h a4 0l P"+•� �"",� �a..ti.. ,h'����p L L t j r"c��°1+ o w�N !-►•w�Y'f r+,.hy �£•o;o•o t i S310N 1yw'11n3 110107 NOI"IN0530 •H1d30 N3Ar1 MON 1YW'1'In3 110107 NOWINDS30 I H1d30 113AY1 . :'AHdYNO11Y111S � :'AHlYN911Y1tiS CNV r // 'ON ONY 3dAl 1531 :31Y0 t 03N331gS :WOIYAYOX3 :MOSIA113dnS 13115 WA11531 131Y0 t 03NUUM :1101YAVDX3 :YOSIAN3dnS :3115 S31YNI011OOD lo3foad : s311+NIaaooD s5a3laAoyS'Ss104J412ny'S111014360d : 133HS CV0031J ,k3Awn5 33523peo4S'53104n7ny'saloySsod ; 133H5 ObO:)3M A3Abf15 r SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auer holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : � �aca COORDINATES : PROJECT : bq ysrt�l— : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE. TEST TYPE COORDINATES �v( ` ANO A NO. : SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR t SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : Sr y� K,c/Mer Yw" �Ty� STRATIGRAPHY.: lgfl�� STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR • SIJLT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR OLT.MAT. NOTES e.o'-o,2� AGM KacrPo� I 11 O.O D 1 KK�ryV J. aT ALM Corm-cgrc n1 SNaa �o`( y n N r-e. t�ou�o� 2 02 G.q` C0-0_ �aM J SWD la Vs- blwll(drsc•) PC ULM Kor.,FoJ 3 C y - ?T $q,Jpy (a►n �w1G J°it..` �� 4 J(.uao^� a 4 S ' S 6 ? � 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface • General Nota : (Neu If cult.material roWnsd,and if toil samplessamplesare taken.) Give depths relative to{round surface General Nous (Note If cult.material retained,and If sell samples are uken.) Cross Refs : Cross Refs : Plan Photos s Plan Photos Section ; Notebook Section ` Notebook i i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I PROJECT COORDINATES I PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TESTTYPE AND NO. : AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES i I I n - 2 Z 3 3 `Qy-Colic (moi 4 4 i S I 3 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Now (Non If wit.material retained,and if sod sample are taken.) General Note (Note If cult,material retained,and if sod samples are taken.) Cross Rafs : i Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos r � Section Notebook Section Notebook , 1 i I 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Aute holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : "l3RticT� COORDINATES t PROJECT COORDINATES : SITE; SUPERVISOR s EXCAVATORS SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE "r AND NO. AND NO. : /J'G h�/M� �y ���7y Sr✓` �1 STRATIGRAPHY,s STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• OLSCRIPTION COLOR sULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LI I O.O- 0.2 �Y4Mq} W/�lnoTMt' � n1c.N No1�t�a I i l0-1 I 2 a,X 0,1r tre"wt—swrrIt 104. 2 Go'r-d ] 4 4 S S 6 6 i T T 8 d i •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depUu relative to ground surface General Nota (Nan if cult.maeelal repined,and If sod samples are taken.) General Nom (Note If cult.material«Wined,and If soil samples are taken.) ti, Tfsyy � yl 2.0 i Goss Refs Goss Refs s plan Photos Plan Photos Section I Notebook Section Notebook x�l SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats PROJECT : Ay to re COORDINATES s PROJECT s l 3 .s COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SIT[t SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR s SCREENED T DATES TEST TYPE A ' AND NO. ' � AND NO. �1� �b�1 sT S3 xIe/,,e r", 9A71?�, >y STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.s LAYER DEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I LAYER DEPTH• OESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. N07E5 i �/— • rlu M l C 1)C 6th o U IoF+rh Z til i O.y, p SnTso n1 cM Ffot,To J 7 I • I. CO S o rel C a 0.q': Ss.rJ I.s� sd k"`��G NcM C(oar?ON 4 4 S S 6 ti 7 7 77 g i g I , •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Neu y cu1L material retained,and If sell samples are taken.) T i General Nota : (Neu If alt material retained,and If sell samples are taken.) Of/GtXIJ //, /j lHeal21 l No, Cf/l r(//'a�t 1�/G�l`fri,✓� Crou Refs Cross Refs : Plan Photos Plus . I Photos Section Notebook Sudan I Notebook i fir► ! • SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT : COORDINATES S PROJECT COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXGVATOR s SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE r+ �gJ7� / ,/ AND NO. AND NO. : I J�l.. /"+'lJ— / cr--S6 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES vein rtycd 1 - 2 ./ K�/Go4M bvr4 z 'A i • -�p0 1 2 3 _C/ ? AS3lLJgn�/7 LOay, IOJd �8 3 `��( a.0 4 13 ° s S 6 6 � ' 7 S 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If culL materlal retained,and If$oil samples are taken.) 2 l�Um^'i �/A�Pt J O/i Q /a h?!p a�o�vn.r� Tv Ba cL yRsl o"F General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) (YI ore lye,--e _`y"j;4 ler fa y�.•.ti?` GmTs ai r�Ii�'G� Cross Refs t _ Cross Refs PI•n Photos Plan Photos Section ' Notebook Section Notebook 40 • SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT : Q COORDINATES PROJECT : Ar1r�.— COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: AND T OPE tl L AND NO. • �'�- )C2 vtc %y° fl �i(yK AC �(f�pfT /� �5���/ STs / 5 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY : LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SIJLT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 • 1 O.Or—p,? )twro Lv.TM� NG 2 H z p.�' S� J Iwo.. toY�Y[t r�4n •� - .� �ANp� aNm NC M rel 2 4 3 0.$/_ 7 GohM4 be" (OcJrL F IJG�`' I 3 3 2,C l 1a& 0 4 S S 6 6 7 7 8 8 •Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retaind If soil sample's/are taken.) /� M q /h /� �'I OIC/ZOh w '-tLu�G'OS a-- LO General Note (Note If cult,maWlal retuned,and if soil samples are taken.) S () p fi1,yL(S (71-'r7 / � � '� ` 4� / !N A /Vo Cross Rel's Goss Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section ` Notebook Section Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holo,Shovel testsSURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau PROJECT : COORDINATES : PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED Kl� Zflf,7 r r t DATE i TEST TYPE AND NO. : rIll� n [ AND NO. /M� IJY S� �C v>`� . , ssy . STRIATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR yULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES I 0.01-0.21 {�+:•s9s r+�ryos w( tje. D Ho.4.,J I 0.0�.0.3 haa-ee r+Ilew'r^tigj N C'^ s grtze ) ' � I•ytiy�i 2 / 1 `yF�� t-"- ( I.y NGM 2 at✓ ' (.o/ JRfJJ (ay..- rAC� 4 Neuq.a 0,2 • o.y y q �/elvv.•1 � \ (d 9ti S78 l / P •F�G Sq�l /oy/•S� rJ C.M 4 4 I S � 3 6 6 7 7 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes a (Note t e 1f cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) Gens Notal(Note If cult.matuial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) i T 4 r _ Cross Refs : Goa Refs t Plan Photos Plan Photos `y1 Notebook Section. 1 Notebook i Section i 1 J I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT COORDINATES PROJECT : �!� � COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE TEST AND NOPESITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES 1 . 1 2 3 3 4 4 3 S 6 6 7 7 8 8 •Give depths relative to`round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note if cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note if cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) i Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : r COORDINATES : Jr 6¢ PROJECT "''°r9r COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE �Lr _.1/ r �j�/ AND NO. AND N0, : YK ` 3(-/ ( STRATIGRAPHY,1 STRATIGRAPHY LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES 0 1 0• 1 UMrC 1 2 3'2--#/'o /OnNy tSa w/ % Uc,tj 2 3 J 3 Q 4 4 s S ti 6 7 7 S 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Noce If cult.meta/lel retained,and If toil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) 2V 11 ,S 4Q•9rRY• A0�q p P/�Uj o. C'A,e,♦a�(j-ftti U��' l ✓ofrttl!� r rzvn 3 Cross Rab r Cross Refs Plan Phouss Plan Photos Section I Notebook I Section Notebook Ip SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT 13 A Yctev COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR" SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE I SITE: SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR. SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE G AND NO. : AND NO. J«/M7 'q�' 8/Kl9 sr 6 5" AC IF-6411p /� y 5T 6 G STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,i LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;U LT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• �IDESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0.0� !•�� Caw•d[ Sn+L1/.v,,, 11'11'(/36W:ac�dtsc) r 2 3 l— 2 J 0 AV--C Sano l eAev A�C'm 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 8 8 i — •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground&Wase General Notes ;r(Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Noce If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) 'C' 1.4 Col.cJ 0.moi, OMNI/ Gnw e�S /n, 4 '-A koc�2c.�S, No Crow Raft I Crou Refs Plan Photos I Plan Photos , Section ' Notebook Seaton Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I PROJECT : 13RxY COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR, SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE PROJECT ( COORDINATES �C 142�/YfA Ykr AND NO. : Sj 6 7 SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : STRATIGRAPHY.: /ll J LAYER DEPTH• OESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES D STRATIGRAPHY. 1 o.d-0, 7 Kw«oa 4.wo.7 .t>' 3 NLAYER DEPTH DESCRIPTION COLOR yULT.MAT. NOTES } E43 0'9� I•�`' c•�-.tcl.,..T„,� lo,y.e.sh Nlcn, 3 flk+:aJ �p� 3 J 4 6 5 6 8 7 •Give depths relative to ground surface g General Nous ; (Now If alt.masrial retained,and if sail samples are taken.) *5�/P�+4'�'7l� •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note if cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Cross Refs Plan Photos Cross Refs Section Notebook Plan Photos Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I SURVEY RECORD SHEET ►ostholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests ►ROJECT: PROJECT COORDINATES : COORDINATES (JaK�+w- SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE n� icy 8�zs/�ti 'Sr �c KY,IMP %° gkyl5y AS° STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: . LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ,� gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;LLT.MAT. NOTES 10.0 0,y� A"44#S 8 Ke? nvT O We ia.a 1 /•J - O.L 6uw%.a wwo/ r 11".rIJ C M °di-loo,a Ac M 0.Lr- !.Z� �.tga1 /.a" ($-I W-Y/L 3�`vK16 Wc`i a t{e./4oa 2 0,2,'-o.q r SA�JT fill la y'et✓3• SCM A rl a c1 a sI e• 9 /.Z r^ Ut+'6 Sn..d y (°:(It-S/1 2r4i�K�s�lx�4 3 D.q 9x CoA.y! lewd Se��{ /OYa 4 4 I s s 6 6 7 7 8 S • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface Ger etai Notes • (Note If cult.material retained,and if toil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note Ifcult material retained,and if veil temples are taken) Sfo +54s jvs Af 3 -It �P� Crow Refs : Crow Refs ' r _ e Plan Photos Plan Photos Section I Notebook moo I+ Notebook 1 � t i I a � SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau , SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau PROJECT : COORDINATES : S i PROJECT ; �1A Yffoz COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR i EXCAVATOR s SCREENED? DATE s TEST TYPE SITE s SUPERVISOR s EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE 4C ,//2�iG y / C� AND NO. : / 1� S i ! WOO AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: �-r 7' STRATIGRAPHY,i LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DE • DESCRIPTION COLOR ;1JL7.MAT. NOTES 75 � L ,F�UMtC ,(JCN 01lGr',ton PTH I 2 �/LCWrn ro�r7�� ,(JCM �f Oreton 2 3 `1 1,0-,d7 �M .O(r-5(]l U� (it a ilZtYn ' •� '7 QGl /'AlN 110'�' Z �/� 4 4 7 7 S g •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If culL mattrial retained,and it soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note It cult.mamiah retained,and it soil samples are taken.) 40 A5 o �aap/ Q(o„P 4; d-etAe 6, Cc�C�t?s�'gcX+a1 �J,�Gr Siwdc r . c�r�np /rlrs d r yl-n �J r / ` r// L/Zu.r Cross Raft : Crows Raft t Plan Photos I Pun f Photos Section j Notebook i Section j Notebook I ii SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : ( COORDINATES PROJECT 15 4 ytppCOORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISORS EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TESTTYPE AND NO. SITE% SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR t SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE L I<2�Mp 67- 33 AND NO. 14C AY STRATIGRAPHY.t STRATIGRAPHY,i LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLORd ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9U LT.MAT. NOTES 1 Oer� I.li Lo�.R /'ways�tt fe�� 7�� NGH At rJ...e., J V 2 " 2 A10.77'/ev 4113 3 n 3 •� 0A/2••fe 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 a g •Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note if cult.material retained,and if soj samples are taken.) Cjfsffcd 4—+s 4 '%L ej fp+ acawvfcd !a !� eutN•J (Ib du.clue. 25 iF r aP �».��- A//e2 /�M C //Or¢./ror✓� CCC/l O� '4 �/Orri�'•, c/ +, p T / l✓N!T /6 e1' �/r e c/ �rfHO,t'/z Crou Refs : Crou Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook r SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : O COORDINATES : PROJECT : COORDINATES sr- 76 SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR* SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXC ATOR: SCREENED? DATE' TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. • Si 76 STRATIGRAPHY: STRATIGRAPHY.t LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT,MAT. NOTES I D.G'-O•Z� �w�eoWlrtrrM�7^ NGM 09et0 1 r{/L NG A NrtiiaoJ i = 0'2 d ✓y LGan '01r Z Al�Onc d r ri7rt 3 0rgr- ?# F,+, a'+ 10yn. 577 3 .8"L' 3 CocirsPsga y�ogM 'O✓'" ✓ ,_o 4 4 S S 7 7 8 8 • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are ta}--) General Noses : (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) n / # �(^ a4' I•�� L �IS rrC pP<ds YaJ�W M ��OtitC'� ���C(C�l �ll� l�dUr/1 4". Cross Rsfs : Cross Refs : ' r i Plan Photos Plan Photos Section 1 Notebook Section i Notebook 1 I 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test$ PROJECT : ? �._ COORDINATES s PROJECT i COORDINATES I S r SITE : SUPERVISOR: rx;;; R: SCREENED T DATE:/ TEST TYPE n SUPERVISOR: EXG/YAnTO/jt t SCREENED? DAVE: TEST TYPE PrL D yyP SONO. : (�C/MTS S/�Si:� AND N�� ar-�7 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,s LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES 6.M.T/rd,Cr+ryl O' 3 Fc tc zn 1 D.O - 0•� 7544d �dyc /f ;"fes s Coe-.-s 4. s4-6L to y.c std A-n N...s r) 4 4 I 1 i 1 I 6 i 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if sod samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note If cult,material retained.and if soil samples are taken.) CLlaci4l T�l� �Jo/� 2c� Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Sectbn I Notebook i I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tau ) SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger hold,Shovel tests E PROJECT : COORDINATES t79PROJECT : f�XTE)4 COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EX fVVAATOORR/:/ SCREENED 1 �DyA�TE:/ TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE /rC �' / 1 1411 !/ ".r 2S/`'Sy AND NO. : AND NO. : 57 A c. Kn fvHIHD %9 phi/9y sr po STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER I DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;U LT.MAT. NOTES 1 6.o:0.7' 4W W. l S.aorr .,ai A/c-1 G P(dwrdrr.J 2 c4Rnaf� loQr( by�y/y � 0—011X2 +r^- l V1- , 4 co24'w LaIM� fano( Id try sig gl AJ a 0.4 / 3 i �'�"% r,�a (rya f/S Nc•, 4 4 /.,3/^20 ` /�y^ �� Wci,t �jZ JfoMio s • S 6 � I B I 7 7 a • a ' Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if sod samples are taken.) General Notes (Note if cult.material resalnsd,and If soil simples are taken.) �'7�IC/g.�i// �^/.'L'C��_ ir'SfD�e,� ,I•f 'Z.p� i Goa Refs _ Goss Refs s Ptan Photos plan Photos Section I Notebook Section 1 Notebook i ) i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests t PROJECT : F COORDINATES : i PROJECT : Xl'erL COORDINATES : SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAY4TOR: SCREE16 7 DATE- TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. : ACA�1Ae- �� B��E 9`� Sr 47 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYERDEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES t 0 0'-0,2, � ww/aoor.wi .4G.y V A41 / 7 Jit 2 0,2- 0,? Sw�1rI 6,H,, lett., y�. 'VCM 4 tf ees+,.: 2 I •(I- •41 (D *z Gah.a s /w 3 J,3 : �� T SA^�, ldye_S�G ��,tn b ^� � a f 4 4 s s 6 6 7 7 T a a • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface Gen"Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nota (Note If cult.material retained,and if sod samples are taken.) s+�pp'd a'-+ I•s""' Sit I•t �� �ra*Z'S /it G'/t,r7. /VC e l T—a AZ Gots Refs Cross Refs : Plan Photos Plan Photos SectlonNotebook I Settbn ' Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT9,4x-n,�7COORDINATES : PROJECT : p COORDINATES � y�rar�- SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXC7YATR; SCREENED i DATE. TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR; SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE ANO NO. AND NO. s � /� 8�`/g9 . sr 9� h� I�nlMa /yu ihc�9y sr 9 STRATIGRAPHY.s STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER OEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES Dr I CLCYn i � p dCti( 1 0.0— 0.2 rwrA)GAf 1(t� H•+rsea 2 Z 0 d cXaaO(� �pQ k t vnann 2 p2_ 9* Cam J• ( S ad (0 yR S/S rIGM 8 Na.rsa J " 2 1 Coat�satcl7Ceren., v zan 3 4 4 S S 6 � 6 • 7 T b b •Gin depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes ; (Note if cult.materia!retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nous : (Non If cult material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) `r"t't�(u�'ra��s l� �, de�� Tl,`1 �10i� a - SPP -S i 43 �s1►nrcj Nt I•yl No A Naas2oJ z � Cross Rats Cron Refs : Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook I Section Notebook I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holo,Shovel tests i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES t PROJECT -Z COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE t TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR I EXCAVATOR I SCREENED t DATE; TELT TYPE 6 AND NO. I AND NO. C U' >�C 1•y '' �'�6 S`j' /oo bio/ STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,I LAYER //�+ � .Z DEPTH• DESCRIRION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES pv nt l C ( ", C a I t V - 0 - .1 � 1 1'U c sur Z— (��C \G 3 4 � 2 t� - o A rti1 . I Co R rcjG 54uvdb (aw, N.. 4 S S 6 6 7 7 8 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Note (Note If cult.material retained,and If toil samples are taken.) /� General Nous : (Note If cult.material reWned,and If toil samples are taken.) !V O C L�l��� n.Ju-7lr•i�f S M wit' q rarG(p /!> � t /�/ /_ l �iv7sL`I �1 �'GLt�U /�• � � � /z'cr�,scv'. Cross Refs : Crow Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos section Notebook Seaton Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORO SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : /3114 COORDINATES : PROJECT : t COORDINATES : SITE : SUPERVISOR; JEXCAVA 1 SCREENEC t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO, : AND NO. 1[36. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,t LAYER I DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT, NOTES 1 � NUM JC 2 (J� � LOAM �,'i 2 NCM 2 , — LOAM G��32 N�/'"1 3 / 1'2- COA Ne 5,VAo7aM r NCM V 3 1/ 12 504/yoJOA-AA A,I 4 4 S s I 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Noce If cult.material retained,an4 if veil samples ua taken.) General Notice : (Note If cult material retained,and if toil samples are taken.) �p C U t,(' I�/7-C,reo-r•C-".L/S'. C.v (Tu r1t /W.4rj r iuQ, S n.t•cC� A,-0.1 o f 3 mdtl of hOWZI3 /i✓ A t tr f/0m—,z ?S� [ 9 rav I r Cross Refs : Cross Refs : - t _ Plan Photos Plan Photos Sectlon Notebook Setxlon ' Notebook I { SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET t Portholes,Auger holes,Shovel tuts PROJECT COORDINATES PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR t SORE EDT�•W 0 TE: TEST TYPE /� �¢•i d�g/� AND No. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT:MAT. NOTES .A--I^off i rr 70 Y'� ?r Guhwff� to y toyElotlto � I J CkirtQ(� Zoo' i• 4 I 4 3 3 6 6 I 7 I 7 e • •Give depths relative to=round s"ce •Give depths relative to ground surface i General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) i General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and If toil samples are taken.) i I i Goss Refs , I Goss Refs : Plan Photos Pun Photos t Section Notebook Section ' Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi , SURVEY RECORD SHEET Portholes,Auger holes,Shove!testi PROJECT : 6..41f COORDINATES [:?R0:j:EECr �` COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: EANONO.Pl ' SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE Kw IN� Jz' 1'1 H ((�� AND NO. lK� � STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY. 7211. PTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR t;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT, NOTES 0.0"0 'V 2 S'; i4v7,v4T i' his L Ca�r�v�f 0.0 -0,7"-Z J, I SQwI�•1 171Nn ryK)�S 3•i/'A 'R,i1,. W4�JJ � tto L?�� 2 I� 0,2'_ SQ d,t 4'r• loy y�L. , a lo.a.L-o-4 o �I-_ �s coMp HK5/a r� c�.., W� 4 n: h }t.•a •J 4 S • S , 6 6 7 g � , � g Give depths relative to ground curface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Now If alt.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) General Note : (Note If cult.materiel retained,and If soil samples are taken.) I Crou Refs s _ I Cron RefsPlan s Photos plan Photos Section I Notebook Section Notebook 1� I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I PROJECT : .� COORDINATES PROJECT Q +u` COORDINATES SITE t SUPERVISOR s EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE s SUPERVISOR s EXCAVATOR t SCREENED T DAT[= TEST TY AND NO. : AND NO.. ¢� 13� ' % �f���9 ST fob k� K�i`►n� 'l�f" pi�rjgy S��oy STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. . LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;U LT.MAT. NOTES e 0.0/IC'L, 0 Ncah.� �—•2 l7UNt, C Ni (7 � 2 //� t 2 0.2 r. Yf 54-'Lt (04 Id Ye, 33 G�/ j* Cu1mSi Ioa 1-cs'l . 1°a''S�L A/GM 8 1{o.,•Joa .(— /r5 R se v � � � 4 S 3 i 6 6 7 7 a •Give depths relative w{round surface • Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if sell samples are taken.) Gen"Notes (Noce Ir telt.masrial retain e',and if sell samples are taken.) r cr,,,,��5 , i11 17/DR IZeh /V 0 C U / rW'^� /Lf,�1 l r iuQs Cross Refs Crow Refs Plan Photos Pius Photos i , Seaton Notebook; Section i Notebook t SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT e R COORDINATES sl Q PROJECT Ati .r^ COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE' TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. AND NO. N BI�+l9y T1/I STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.1 LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 4•,^J-O•? (ln'tiC 0611 1 gC�7iM A 2 p.1�.J8� 5ald � lrs !�!� Nh. b 3 j D (• �Q(c1t�ClAN?7ltARM . 1'I 4 4 I 6 6 i 7 7 8 g •Give depths relative to ground surface 'Gin depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.martial retained,and If soil samples arc taken.) General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) O+a1� 7,4 Koa • Wo eN7VreA1. 41 ��• JOrILGV SAtk`/4ddr,,4—a IXa✓e�, i Cross Refs f Gross Refs s _ — Plan Photos Plan Photos Section l Notebook Sectlon I Notebook II SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES : PROJECT 2 COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE r A A� QG/Dl� �f ����9/l ST /lam RL 1�2/M� 'ly E�IgK srli3 STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DETTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES t i U M 1( -- M C N� O 1 0,0 r'D.2 NC•H 0 riml'fo.l Z ll ! r i 10 CI4µ/Z 2 tlI S c (r. loye 5fG Ase Aoa (� o, 4 4 S S 6 6 i 7 7 I 8 ' a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notre : (Nota If cult.martial retained,and If soil samples are taken.) General Nous : (Note If cult,material retained,and if toil samples are taken.) N 9 C U IT rt d Ilii wt e'�iw6f n/T 0 r y r Cross Refs � Cross Refs : _ v Plan Photos Plan Photos Section1 ` Notebook • Section ` Notebook I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Anger holes,Shovel tau SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECTw � 112 COORDINATES : � ` PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR; SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE f AND NO. : AND NO. M-0 1/k 9/1vI9N ,.. T1s' STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR trIJLT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 o,od- a.2' few,,s +w.•-A,+r p6m U N1M TC 2 u (e A-Ai 0 2 A 1 y'-o.[,, g. ,,a , A)C,h A rL,v�ecs 3 Q S C �/1�N0 'AMM f ! rl 3 0+ Lo Mt-SC 10--j 6t—l- I v!-�, rJGM g ilex+ion 4 4 S s 6 6 T T g i g •Giro depths relative to ground surface I •Give depths relative to ground surface Genera!Nota : (Naga If cult material retained,and it soil sample are taken.) ! General Nowt (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) 0 G U 11v r a,f IL(�fi�Zrrcc.(s•. Y Stop at 1•b S,Mt 1r,r,tra�� j,1 ja f/eRrzin F Cross Refs 4 Crass Refs t Plan Photos I Plan Photos Section 1I` INotebook Sealon l Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I 1 PROJECT : Amt•2 COORDINATES : I PROJECT : 1311X'r (z COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: LEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR, SCREENED? DATE N0. : ^ TEST TYPE AL KrZ/MD ' �' / tC/16 �C-/C) / p ` AND NO. IT it STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESC4o,, CLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LOaoa ' 0- -.2 t � Z o.l'_ 0,3 S4.ra y4 y/r. AJC q !(�Mro- 2 6 IaA rv, 70 l !! .•� 1 /7S NtM g /�yylt•� 3 .(p (• A ZL4 r tl 4 S S I 6 6 7 i a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Gin depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Note : (Note If cult.material retained,and if log samples are sakm.) Snpp� vJ 1. �TUrj Cross Refs r Cron Refs ' r Plan Photos Pun . Photos Sealon I Notebook Section Notebook i SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auer holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : Dsrrf� COORDINATES PROJECT) 41 Ox Z COORDINATES • SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR �� /� ➢ i/ // AND NO. : ) SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE l� 14,11144 i A AND NO. ST III L � I I? (k :;� 1'1 I STRATIGRAPHY,: I ,'T I I q . STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES { ! LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT,MAT. NOTES n1eM Q l�o[.awi 1 orL ' J^i 5 y Iz}M (cam lift• MCI. A 210 ? 3 0�l ; �o Se.� 164" �Gr: I 0.2 . p.�f C•n^d�( �a4•�� y��/2 JGM k 11oe+7�1 3 INN S�G 4 4 S • I s 6 6 i T 7 d 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nous (Note If cult.material retained,and if sail samples are taken.) General Now (Note If/cult.material retained,and If sod samples are taken.) T. Jt�p�'� �i•�' ',t0� Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos . Plan Photos Section Notebook Sealers Notebook I .. �. 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Portholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi PROJECT 1 6A-1TEVL COORDINATES : PROJECT : COORDINATES t SITE= SUPEAVISOR: EXCAVATOR I SCREENED 1 DATE 1 TLSTTYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR 1 SCREENED? DATE I TEST TYPE AND N0. _ STRATIGRAPHY.I STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SU LT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0,0�—or2, ' 2 ' o•L, Sr�+1 (OA�/n 101x'1/�' 2 2- N D 10�-M fb Z. „ b,l — 1 NLr A lfvweeJ n 7 laae*w ("--hs—dq f#4'SS' 3 (O"v Ve Koti zo 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 a a • • Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground turfacs samples General NNotes (Noes If cult,material Twinedand it log il are taken.) Gan"Nous (Nets If cult.material retained,and If toil samples are taken.) G j Tv 1 _ Cres Rett Cross M/s : t Pun Photos Pun Photos i Section Not 'vection Notebook I ^SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testt SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi R PROJECT: COORDINATES DR ; PROJECT : EZ COORDINATES tz SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR'. SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR; SCREENED T DATE. TESTTYPE /�/ LL ((�,� (� l u AND NO. : 17x7 G r� AND NO. �9Jl'CI �/ A k2/n� ''/.y STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES QD.O Z uat L d F hjb� 1 I o.0 ac�I o 80-11.3 2.0.4 toy 2 � N C M A 140.t ' 0• '( G Catrsc�, j�qa a tor`.S51 d� 3 J.1�- ce.+se Ips.cl S..d fa IV- 'leM I 1�0�t2•• I 4 4 I 3 3 ' 6 I 7 7 a a • i •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General New : (Note If cult. twlal retained,and If$ou samp//l''es we taken.) #enerel Now (Note If cult,material retained,and It soil samples are taken.) �C7�'4:n f llZon [`Cry �eV �a✓G(S ` Cron Rah Cross Refs : s Plan Photos Plan Photos • Section 4 Notebook ` Section Notebook i 1 l I � I 1 i � SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auer holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auer holes,Shovel tau PROJECT aRzTEfL COORDINATES PROJECT di>nTfvL COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: AND/NO. : SCREENED T DATE- TEST TYPE KiL/MD 1�!}�f J(�N 7f f2 �L K(Z/M) ��H �� 8I30I9N ANDNO. : STRATIGRAPHY: I STRATIGRAPHY,i LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES ACM 0 µe..: NCM Q Hca,eon+ 2 1 — p,�j� 16.1,I/L "� Io.,-m NG/1 &o.4 5 �s..\ A f10417,JJ 2 !),L�' �OA„^ JDyra�/2 7 0 (�'- 1,f cV""" 10' 'j 104 17/4 4 Se...�- NCn 47 lroiN TO^ I 3 4 i 4 S I S 6 i 6 i 7 7 8 I •Give depths relative to ground surface I •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nota (Note 1f cult.material retained,and if sou samples are taken.) General Nous : (Note It cult.material retained,and If soil sampler are taken.) Cron Refs ; Plan Crou Rets �� r Photos plan Photos I Section Notebook Section , Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; e COORDINATES : PROJECT : gw rsyE._ COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR, SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t AND NO. DATE-' TEST TYPE y7 L/ /"f �f/� / I �� AND NO. ^C � �'�y n-e- STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLORULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• G DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES 1 _ SANnI 0A fN 1 r�hl A i O.L= 01 6 r Se.�+7 /aM•- nArsC' �/FNa� (uAM (ti' J II i j O.�r�' LAK a S(�. n1 1 Cn.t 1'(e:�.Z• 4 I 4 3 S i 6 6 7 7 a g • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.ma4rlal retained,and if soil samples are taken,) General Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and If sod samples are taken.) /v�d Ca /Tv.G-e #54zfPa S,Ma,(.c 61�mcwv� cF ('ebbleS l/v7 �ak�zo,� , Cross Refs : Crow Refs Plan Photos ( Plan Photos Section 1 Notebook Section Notebook i 1 ` SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholas,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES n COORDINATES 'SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE= TEST TYPESUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? ATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : I A AND NO, A K2lM9 �y�r ?f 9ti ;T,Za ttC 13G�D(� X� I STRATIGRAPHY.: i STRATIGRAPHY.t LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES i LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 2 ��o�( 10yw yly 2 r It p.2 Sq�dh /a*— �/�yt A Ne+,:.� �� rs SAND / �OAiM �0 � ; Q 5�6 41C^1 (� rl.. eoa o A,17 A SA" OMu I Q /5 4 4 I 6 i 6 7 � 8 g •Give depths relative to{round surface I •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nota (Note if cult,material retained,and if soil samples are uken.) General Notes : (Note if cult,metrial retained,and If toil samples are taken.) �'s+�vyyca �F l�' I N C c u/T�'�..( ru,.T¢r�wl':• S,�...C( rLr►o�n�r F Pr b b�Ps ��. !o o.�r' Q �te��?ter. r 0n-P �.e+a�l f!7 Sura t�i .sr CrLe/C Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook i Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Portholes,4u>jsr holes Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Aupr holes,Shovel tests I PROJECT ; QMT�r� COORDINATES : PROJECT COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED�T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: �VATOR. SCREENED7 DATE: TEST TYPE �'� �y��)• p/�ly� ONO. : IANO NO. 3 d /q d Fxlku Sj:3 1 STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.t %AYERD,E.PT" DESCRIPTION COLOR VULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES u/'�T 4,-�.--�•S w/�+kt �t M " / , ,t . mqro - d �lb,,so;e yfA H0.uWa = o4n fl•a�2aJ ] (G4rVv S/i y41 Io�A 5-4 0.��.. 7� IU,t....-•- NLA 140 4 4 S S 6 i 6 7 7 a a • Give depths relative to{round suRau •Give depths relative to{round sutiace General Notst (Note if cult.material retained,and If toil temples are takent) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if veil samples are taken.) 'k S�ar.�-d 4�" (.5� ►4$✓•'r�y.1 wit l.� / Crou Refs Cross Refs ; i i s Plan Photos Plan Photos Seetlon i Notebook Section I Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger bola,Shovel cents i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel casts PROJECT ; �y} J7R COORDINATES : PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: rCAVTORt SCREENED T GATE t TEST TYP! SITE t SUPERVIsOA g EXCAVATORt SCREENEDT DATE: TESTTYPE ANO N0. ; ANO NO. AC DH "/`�/ �/3� �}G Ka./m) ray., yI /yK ST 13? STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,t LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR fULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER I DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR yULT.MAT. NOTES 1 O' .� J tfC NCM O 1 Q Jr.0.1 hti..-as.��r. ✓T o+ri NG Al 0 flowJ+J / ,i — •`f A>>1A oA ��vr"I A 2 0.2�' c,.4' Sn/ ro.v, lagL 1 1 ucn� Pr Ij r 7 0.4 ' �# 104-1 5^1411- ( M.w slG tjC'M c ,vest IAM �.lr� 4 j • 4 S S 6 6 T 7 b ' s •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notts (Noes If cult.nsaarlal retained,and if veil samples are take'.) 0p p General Notee (Noce If alt.matsxlal retained,and if sell samples are taken.) rva Gu �rurst PA Ate rt, / Ts 5h.,21 2�o f ,� 5h.,21 rz Cross Refs i Cross Refs i ' ; s Plan Photos p� . � Photos Section 1 Notebook Section Notebook • I ' SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT : 6A COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR; SCREENED? DATE% TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE s TEST TYPE ANO NO. : AND NO. C S/ l 35` Ac zK�rtp %y 't �13o%y sr /3s STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,I LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR t;ULT.MAT. NOTES I - ' )tune C - •Z U Al/C — N C to 010 o.1 ►s w�.toM T NL,vt 0 NC.�-�rJ-+ Z i i loyA-NZ SRnD.t )0 A61 11"U42 /VcrN A 2 0•l -o,f p� el"'M . foo-..,I Ivy i s/G In<4..o.w clr�s e ARSP SN-NOa �n l� (XUwrIL I'i�A 6 3 0,{0 4 5.�1 I Ante„ a Noti2,� 4 4 S S 6 6 T T a a •Give depths relative to ground turfaa •Give depths relative to ground surface General Now (Note If alt.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Genual Nota (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) I � c F/4*4 i/7N /3 f>'DR/20/t (/'ieSSv�C �f S4•otpctl 2.2 i No/� (Jlrrla��iNP /Il1ricLr o f Q✓�Trz Crou Refs : Crou Raft : Plan Photos Plan Photos Section 1 Notebook Section Notebook 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthales,Auger holo,Shovel tests ' SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Aug or holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT : PROJECT : {�exrRll= COORDINATES �� Z COORDINATES :SI/�� SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXC,,IAY TOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. 1747/1 li, �u�?Di7.'� SD1.36 f4 �C Kit/M� '' 9 tx1y4 STRATIGRAPHY.t STRATIGRAPHY.: . LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES nw I Z J)C.VI O lLUr1 I 0,O —D Z -J, -0,Y :�l yGcah ��r, i kcon iPry kb rho to q/2 Anon.to.+ 2 �j l z A"/rot.6le 4�«• 7 2 0,l' .:� 3 ti 2 6W3e2aaa7 Cesar,. 'fl/r 5/Y -J)C'q _717111-11-1 S O,S — ?� C'J,`ec N� Ill, F/(' 4 1 4 S S 6 ti T S g • •Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground turfaa General ores GerNti Notes : (NOte if cult.mate/•lal retained,and if soil Samples are taken.) H (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samlples are taken.) + St►r1"4d 4'f' 1,9L ) ;�CrtY/�4i,✓t:,��fe"�uC�n �Q�n!'��r c�rt,�f�Hn�aJcl a(�U'�a.�PiS Croy Reil : Cron Refs i Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Notebook ` � 'I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests j PROJECT : X �' COORDINATES PROJECT: � � COORDI"TES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. AND No STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES i 1 1 1 0.b -p.tc „NMef1 ; Mac NSM D II � n d1LIVQ 2 NIZ : // N res b Nav:=oJ ItQ t- 'h h AWM �� �Ih i4 ' G.J'— 7� coro.,L rogwl s-.D 1°�^s/� �e^,I S 1.D - 2.Z C arse/) o 1/('4'�� SIB eke 1 it otic so•✓ l 4 4 I S S i i 6 6 ' 7 7 a -Ta •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Note (Noss If cult.material retained,and If sod samples are taken.) 4a 4vlNotes (Noif cult,material retained,and if soil temple are taken.) l t VlvrT FI Jv e Fca— �st:zen �I• cd �(Note I Cross Rsfs Cross Refs s s � Pun Photos Plan Photos I I Section ' Notebook Section Notebook i. , Y SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; d COORDINATES : PROJECT : � A._ COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: E%GVATOR: SCREENED TDATF: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXGVATOR: SCREENED T DATE* TEST TYPE i rr AND NO. : AND NO. q 9y ST lqo AL KRIM' Ilv '' f!/3o/9Y s;�y STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 91ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 6 a�- a L" 1��� >- awrn•r?? N cM 0 1 0,0,-°,z s Kao-r-.;1- 2 °•`/—C,�' S k 104m 1121;1• 2 Sn.rJq IDA. b4ti`f/z Ar- A r/wus.J U•2 -U.5 A r4.1.a,,� 1 _ 2{ u a+.,s b'"1 sa r"f!-9/6 1 .' 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 8 a • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Not" (Noce If cult.matsvlal retained,and If soil samples are taken.) Genera!Nota (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) �S*'PP•6- s.l-z•i Crou Refs : Cross Refs I Plan Photos Plan Photos Section NotebookI Section I Notebook I i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROIECT : RA)(tPQ COORDINATES PROJECT �,�� COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENEb 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR. 'EXCAVATOR: SCREE►�ED? DATE,: TEST TYPE IAC / / / AND NO. :` j JA / AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,s LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES I Zl00-Oz uMI� tis fhrriol/�U M 2 d•� M ` 7/-,j 7 7 ; $ 2 Cvac�liwo'y L�u,t, byr S/a! t.G�.S b'rlur and 4 ' 4 S S 6 6 , i T 7 d a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are take/n.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retain,and if sail samples are uken,) 2 Flo.-lc-es CitvwrT) F/'C�✓1 � /�R/z<%I a.t:r<T ul��1ia�e(5 li 6t!C✓rec✓ Cross Refs ; Cron Refs Phsotos Plan Pho[ot Section I Notebook Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger voles,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Portholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT_: SJa/TY.L COORDINATES : PROJECT : UA)Crr. — COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO, AND NO. A L K2/n> S7— tyN s7;N STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 fJ•U -0,7. 4uMg5L rtw!My! a d �i , 1 0,0 — 0,2 MvT— AjC_-'` O H4'oTo. 2 p.p�—�, � [oy y1 2 p.2�' 0 !:� Sammy Jea,r. Nc.M A NGM A do,.ao J 904430-1 Ca(pr r S /or�ch 2 b,G ? Cc 54��.. Iv4ti /� f flat tloti•ma n� C/N 1 J ROM O N 4 4 6 6 7 7 a a •Gia depths relative to ground surface •Gla depth$relative to ground wAace General Note (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes • (Non If cult.material retained,and If sail samples are taken.) t oPPz e+r+ Goss Refs Goss Refs s _ s Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook I i I' a SURVEY RECORO SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORO SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tesu PROJECT �P COORDINATES PROJECT : a-- COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE- TEST TYPE j SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER I OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I rI Um is NCM V 2 " = A 2 r-O.G `l los•^ Ioyz 4/L :JCM A Has, ^ 3 I �� 3 0,4 �if SA.� ldyw S�6 nJG�+'I Ilcar;,4.J Ilav IhU �`d 4 I,y - 1.9 Ln 2 l,r�,JJ l 6 13 i s s 6 6 7 7 g g •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface GeneraJ Notes (Note If cult.maturial retained,and If soil temples am taken.) `{ General Nous (Note If wit.mawlal retained,and if sea samples are taken.) e ,1 CA- /)c Nc Cross Refs : Crete Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos l Section 1 Notebook Section Notebook I I r SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Au erholes,Shoveltests t SURVEY RECORD SHEET Portholes,Auger hole,Shovel tests PROJECT : fax}ice— COORDINATES : PROJECT : 8� �� COORDINATES SITE ERVISOR:j EXCAVATOR: SCREENED i DATE TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR t SCREENED? DATE t TEST TYPE AND NO. AND NO. A c r«/rD Ik N i14'f ST" STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 1 '%'J - O,l h.t..+e•S g rrcerwt„� NGN1 r(oi+.7. 1 '� �N C M � Z i rcy,e. sJ 'x 0,2, _ 1.O 5a-py /oT� n1GM rlrc,so� 2 �k. i r / Ilii, NCi1\ A w.. G !c s d Jt S�L / ' l _ 3 O s �^'rl M b rGw J 3 .1f— 1-7- -2o(fl / �a>u�Wlo lL Kc 4 4 / s s 6 6 7 T -j- a a •Gare depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes ; (Note If cult.material retained,and if toil sampan are taken.) General Notes : (Note If alt.nuturfal retained,and If soil samples are taken.) �t1 l�c'r,,zcn S t°<c„/��✓�, /��tif� — /�a OY� r /t'/�rtr�f-CS Cron Refs Crave Refs t Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Sectlon , Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET ; Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; COORDINATES PROTECT : 3PxTY IL COORDINATES v_ 2 SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXGVATOR s SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. AND NO, A KR/M� '/�'� 8/30/ly sT/fv AL /��"/zaH /v /7` ''i I>/ STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER OE"N• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES t a,0 —0,Z hw—.' ItR.—--r WM o Nw21n.a t 0 .2 �� lir / &Ctil � roy 2 IZ — tC D L 'J.� 54.x. ISA. N&A1 R l{csl J �J "VQ" Of�II� 11A j ; Cah^sE foti.,� (C�R SG ✓JLn^ g 3 f 1 G SANO l�e12h� V 4 4 S S 6 6 T T a a •Give depth[relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes : (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nater : (No[s If cult.martial retained,and If soil samples are taken.) -�''rc>f+ftd A f 2 l� y��^° C '' l�U/•Gu`'� fv1!��t',t^��� / l�/(� �} l/CR/�0✓T r Cross Raft Cross Refs � r r _ i Plan Photos Plan Photos I Section Notebook Section I Notebook J SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthales,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel texts PROJECT : �� COORDINATES : PROJECT t �f COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE I TEST TYPE SITE I SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR I SCREENED T DATE TEST TYPE /I AND NO. AC /� �/h 5�S/�IV/ AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIrnoN COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES 0-Z till, 1 �)•0�-0.2t NCAA � +>;;.u�J 1 tiz �L('.ta' 2 / 1V tit{ 2 Ari<ry 2 G. 2-0,S � Loq� loy��� GI(yrllr/1 u 2 _ 1.o S� '^ b...^ K /L P tics•�o f j tro�^P+a1eb 3Flkrs> I.D'. 7* !04 Ku c l0 1"��� &Abo i 7 '-uRLPJA��k j Lc4 M 4 4 S S 6 6 7 T g 8 . •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.martial retained,and if sail samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.martial roomed,and If sod samples are taken.) -:i-S1 Cron Refs Crow Ref Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook I Section I Notebook I _J i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats g SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : �/+�T�2 COOROINA TES PROJECT `_/ COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED DATE: TEST TYPE X61 AND NO. SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE IAND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: - LAYER DEJ•TH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES STRATIGRAPHY. I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES Gj"r2 vM rC p I 22 oi'� yl2 I I H 13 S r — I• I u A rye SM•n 1 ^14 r , I I 2 tJ� 4 3 11 f 4 d 6 S � 6 a T •Give depths relative to{round surface 8 General Notes (Note If cult material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) •Give depths relative to{round surface lU o <---, . til. is. /] //'/ General Notes (Nota If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) s/Vt.vt/ ��pa rl'II 4A a 11C�'I Goa Refs r Plan Photos Cross Refs i Plan Photos Section Notebook � 1 Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Portholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ba.cTTrL� COORDINATES PROJECT : COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR., SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND N0. : t�y r! Y�31y AND NO. srls� / � STRATIGRAPHY. l/ -'TIs3 STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES t � Gwr►S r�Ke.��wf rlcn� O Hcyrea 1 r 0,0—O.L� Jtw.a,y j. rlr.r,s,,r o "OJ.Iru.J C/- _ - 0.2 — 1,2� $r.�1y low/> loy+� y/y Ate$ / A He.,tto� 2 I r S/e roI's 3 I�Z — 7 j. Cdo-nj,� lo/VM Sn'CI (0N2 'iGM 6 S CUe•�rG, 16�..' yJl rarl 0 i{e,s.,svJ 4 4 S . s 6 . I 6 7 7 a • a I •Glve depths relative to ground surface I •Glve depths relative to ground surface General Note ; (Note if cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nota (Note If wit.material retained,and If wU samples are taken.) u Cross Refs I Crew Refs — s _ Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section 1 Notebook .l i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TESTTYPE PROJECT COORDINATES L AND NO. : C B SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE STRATIGRAPHY.: ( 1 LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES STRATIGRAPHY. j I t LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR GULT.MAT, NOTES ' C, _. j r• '34 L 1 S4171.10L1 10)4 Ctz 3 1 „ 6 2 n�'c �. i-2 V 8 4 3 S 4 /aU 6 S 7 6 D 7 •Give depths relative to pound surface g General Noce (Note If alt.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) •Give depths relative to`round surface o C v �z1 Y Ltif%� General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken,) Cron Refs Plan Photos Cron Refs Section Notebook Plan Photos I Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : .1 rEIZ COORDINATES ,tOJECT COORDINATES . SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 7 DATE: TEST TYPE Q / AND NO.YLtv 'I14STS sr:6, 6 O STRATIGRAPHY. I ' STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR (ULT.MAT. NOTES �� �•( 4tl41t1 rof nl vh �nv:'a�„ I J t vt I u o 2 01 - 04 JrGaor, 101'r4h- 41lovircc, 2i 1�t{kH�i. 5w10'k•� Nwti,wa Uig 1 - U. qA t3y lour _ I' la+ ' v n Lope. f0 0 _ 7Io..t,,l 5+.� 2 �. •(!CM a'�:,Z�7 3 o� to N�^1 g ffi.,z� 4 4 s S 6 6 7 7 6 g ' •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cul�gt,materialretrained,and 11 sag samples are taken.) General Nous (Note If cult.material retained,and if toll samples are taken.) ll"",I A A." to �` P i•2 Cross Refs Cross Refs PlanPhotos Photos ; Notebook Section Notebook I 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Aug or holes,Shovel tests PROJECT COORDINATES I PROJECT : kC PQ COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE. TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: ANC OPE AND NO. t'1 STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR rULT.MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR I;ULT.MAT. NOTES I 0• 01J nlL Lu—S w/ Rp�T,w�l !7 ti ,.� I 1 0- 11 TI✓/VI to —_ ✓,e M � — ,ti, � z� Srrd� loa.h lu,tiy�y 2 r' v 2 p,I � 0 1 / �C" � 11ok,xo,J �I \ AWI J , I p.,r�s/L u ,I 3 IFy AM '1 NLn'� g No�t�Y-0a S i I I of rogriQ SAWI,ItA+tA in.r I� � 4 4 S 3 6 6 7 T -T i •Glre depths relative to ground surface I •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nom :!'(Nota If cult.ma orial retained,and if toil samples are taken.) /Je Cress Refs : Y Crou Refs 1 Pun Photos Plan Photos . Seaton Notebook Section 1 Notebook I \ SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi i PROJECT COORDINATES COORDINATES : PROJECT COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE 1 TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE +/ AND NO. t � 1 rr AND NO. '/�,' /�Jfp sr jl s p� �,��mD Y q(I/9y sr 16 y STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 1;U LT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES rJCM CG 1.4a{izeJ 1 O.0 �p.2 ku'"`S � ►JG�1 0 f{�.usoa = 0,1/— 0 5 s> rdy lonw 104"N1y N� v, A Kr-L,N,� Z Q.G —Q 6r I ce.� LGM A ms-wt"J I 3 0•S�- '-k (d V lO�aS�� �cMj ���,s�a 4 4 S , S 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface • Give depths relative to ground surface General Nota (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nota : (Nog If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) A 54"1p� Y if Cross Refs I Cross Rafs • _ plan Photos Plan Photos , Sectloa ` Notebook Section Notebook 1 - SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT �{ COORDINATES PROJECT : IJ4vtsvL COORDINATES V �� SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR; SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. AND NO. : 1, �f { — / �-� ���I'h� Ir( l I Cl Y I 16 STRATIGRAPHY.t STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR rULT.MAT. NOTES �f4 1 1 CI^,2 >"1 0 M I'll OL/cm o 2 0 = u.L o,6 5,.d UAV\ l0K`Yl� �c� >G j{enatc AM t04 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Now (Nae If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.maarial reWned,and if soil samples are taken.) ,y cj fs ,1 hY t g Cross Raft Cross Refs s _ – Plan Photos Plan Photos • Section Notebook Section Notebook j i i 1 SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT a�C COORDINATES : PROJECT : 64-17-6COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. sr /bq STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY,l LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• ( DESCRIPTION COLOR SU LT.MAT. NOTES / �htw-HSS w itu..r,vK( I / i Il.t+.�Ay w�Ru✓7Nl y� A��/✓� U' %!nn>+�t}C.> f 2 6,j - p.j lOq�� IJyti��2' )GM A ) 2 0,� '' O G� '7'*aN lrn n IJ (2N/t N4� A l(o fti.J LOIMAi (vbwsG lea...l Sud 1V.lic 5� Ivan Bbl N&1A �oardc.� p,I. g Q ilociti 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 i a a • Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to around surface General Notes (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nota : (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) i r Cron Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos I Plan Photos i Seaton Notebook ! Section Notebook i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT xT PROJECT : COORDINATES j /7I : COORDINATES �a.�u• 13 an SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : / 2G1�1Jf=4 AND NO. INC /Cl STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES o 0—j u,>1:c 2 Q 10 � atv,lyL.�:r., �oyr• �� .Ui'..� f(Or�tcn 2 11 .3 tj IcAAA 4 A. )I 3 Q.$ - l•� ci; r/-aa:v� lU/r �Ui•tii r�zc;n ' 3 — 1-� Col4rse Salloc,l IG~ Q 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 6 b •G • Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nous : (Note if cult.material retained,and if sail samples are taken.) NCr G..JfVrtx SM o of qrIts / 1 Cron Refs Cross Refs s Plan Photos, Pun Photos Section Notebook I Section l Notebook I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel test SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : (� K COORDINATES PROJECT : �hy�Gv` COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR; EXCAVATOR t SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE / AND NO, V g/m� 1` 1' c AND NO. : STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT, NOTES 1 G.o/-O,i (�µ"`a` �2.rr�trJ rtGn. d Nc.x�zo-) 1 J,U�.p.I k was w I2�YMti r�GM p 2 !� `f YIL A1C 2^� NG N1 � ('�a ti,'i•r,l p,J'-u,� SA•Hd� ton,,,. w A.fy.,,,•.s�)� a.(�-0,4� S�•ly 1•..- I a 1/2, �7 3 0,3 — k G`t..sv rqw ` loin �(` Nc.�^ rGay.! 7 p ���?t [irnSk, (m-y o� lJ4•IL•>�� '1C^ 'J Ifc.cigor+ 4 f 4 S S l 6 6 i 7 7 a 6 Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note if cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Guseral Nous (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) x S h P p�l rl' f,}� �; 5(•aPr� ,•�• (,,� , Cross Refs : Cross Refs ie Plan Photos Plan Photos a � Section 1 Notebook Ssalon 1 Notebook t I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tau PROJECT : 13 -- R COORDINATES PROJECT VA>RF�^ COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR* SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE l l /, AND NO. : /�• I/q7 ST I-7� ac KYL/M A IIN AND NO. : STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY, LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR t;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER I DEPTH DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. I NOTES I Q 2 NCs4,1 � 1 �,o�-D-2' h�u,...ay w/M-0rr,,1,r1"' ly. _ : 1 SAND ICAM l� rU 2 i( �} i 2 p.�' ' sh«�I� 4�r«. to �p,�aaJ Q SUtttrSe SA,, 1Cl, bawl 10 .r Z tl j 0 5, 94 eurnsa ler..y JOY, TA rJzM 4 I 4 6 6 T � 7 g � 8 i • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retalned,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nous (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) ill 0 C L l T4111a.l M X?v-;' ' (fpr Snnals o..�°ort` o-F Pebb�s . Crow Refs Cross Refs r C i r Plan Photos i ` Plan Photos Section i Notebook Section Notebook I ' r 1 . I SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT a¢T[ COORDINATES i PROJECT 1 A Y4,t— COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR s EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : I I it AND NO. • �L �/H� lk k�l�yH Si/�•6 ' I I ' STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR sULT.MAT. NOTES i 1%0--su6 ✓/AdeTer. I �tk .vrs wi1(.�r,Wa, 1 0.0 —0.) r NGvI 0 �s yiav J o,p -v.l �vG.✓I V ►4j zev i 0,0,' d' sA+D� (Q4+.t ldt., y�y tJt ✓l /rovsi? : 0.,"' 0.7� 7A.i� �o.� IUt{'G y L NGM Q (G•�w 7 cc+ws; y , 3 C 0'W�o:- 0. d I J tUt.s�� Nc Nl J rPC 161, 0.7 A7 4 4 S S 6 6 7 e a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nous (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Nous (Note if cult,martial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) i off Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos , plan Photos Section Notebook i Section Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT : �_ COORDINATES PROJECT er COORDINATES „$' (''7fj� , SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR! SCREENED T DATE; TESTTI AND YPE 3176 t SUPERVISOR: LXCAVATOa i SCRLLNL1 DATL: TYPE / AND N0. 9l14 Qq AND NO- T416 O. J C T416 _ STRATIGRAPHY.i STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT,MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9U LT.MAT. NOTES Q Z Nr+u r- Uk o 'rrintr r T Of .a.2r 6+^451 KITM+1F 1 t V i -J7Lca = (c 't ylL �t+• p{o,tra•J `u°l3 0 y= l7 cohwa 1w lu�w � Dou,�ic 1r 6 Nb�w� O.S / 7 c x�;e bw,l y LvaM rD�r � 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 L 8 •Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Note (Noss If cult,material retained,and if soil temples are taken.) General Note (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) a4- I.3� Cress Refs I Cross Refs s _ v Plan Photos Plan Photos Notebook Section 1 Notebook Section } I i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests i PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT : A .r� COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR- SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR. SCREENED t DATE: TEST OPE AND O Ac 13��prl �y � � ST 1P0 fK ����� �4 m STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES )CAM 10"'9 A S /� II 3 i 11 rS L SrM o ��nn l A" ? 6 6 4 f4 rre (ANDD ICII•11 0 + S 4 4 S S 6 6 T T 8 r S •Glve depths relative to ground surfus •Give dspths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Non If cult.maesrial reuinsd9,and If soil samples are taken.) General Nous : (Note If cult.martial retained,and if soil samples are taksm) G J �U/t+� A4i .r� �S, /10 C U �✓ cvl rN c i��r tGf s 1 N 0 R v�.tri (^ ,nS �(y� lV� � \aelllzeul u„�µc ;/IMO •V+ O r Il t1'e IS. M Wlt (WA9 J NT 0 � �1/0.•+" S 1 Goss Refs : Goss Reb I s _ s Plan Photos Plan Photos I Sectlon Notebook Section , Notebook � �, i � � I f SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger hold,Shovel tests ,I 1 � PROJECT : b/rlrf-� COORDINATES : ' PROJECT : QFl •r0 COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE; TEST TYPE !!2 UPERVISOR t EXCAVATOR I SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : / AND NO. R <��M9 (�k SIIIYk ST 12. /�c 'IDf+ STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT, NOTES I ()..0 0, I aft.,,.) hO 2 J, 0,5 rjR�1c1� �cnh 1C4Kg4 NCM A I�D.YRJ^� 2 0- 0 SArJD-1 IO , .1 �/ C/VI l 9 [a4swc 1 `-y lDc�ns/� It 0 co iP S,I,4u�A. 4 4 , S S 6 6 7 t 7 r b b • Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths nla[Iw to ground surface General Notes : (Naga if cult.in"Wial retained,and if sod samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) C74 P� I SrOa)( A;0 CL1 Cross Refs : Cross Refs s Plan Photos Plan Photos Sectlon 1 Notebook i Section i Notebook I : SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tats i PROJECTCOORDINATES: : PROJECT : COORDINATES :•��r / �Rrc r(vu_ SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR! SCREENED 1 DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAV TOR I SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : J/� ^l,/ y/1 AND NO, 4G " `i/1lei� sr/jy .&I Y' dYl '- '/1/� STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES J l tax/ r k7lr`l`/ XfJI � !(Cil2vA i , � i� r o yH,y/`/ Ap New Q•a I r c� j��`7'y r+�M r/6 (j Hou Z• Orstr ll l/LO 6( r� �z�N ma 2 3 - (7 U£ti( 3 3 4 4 S S 6 6 R 7 I 7 • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (Note If cult.material retained,and If toil samples are taken.) General Notes (Noes It cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) n � �,yFoPPZ�l n-� I•� ' ��'cz vF � Cross Rafa Cross Raft Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook ' I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Augor holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Posthola,Auger holes,Shovel tau I : PROJECT: COORDINATES : PROJECT COORDINATES 6h't'">— SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE.' TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENto I DATE: ANG OPE �` (/�/MD I/N t, AND NO. v2/MI� ��:" i lis�r 5, idc. ` r gl'�'K STRATIGRAPHY. STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH a DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES I k'� loge.y/y rJcM Af HI—A J NC..'N yi Z4-j , 2 ' L" P"h°b lays 5t/, ,� 2 3 3 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 g a • Give depths relative to ground surface Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if toil samples ars taken.) General Nota (Note If cult,matulal retained,and If soil samples are taken,) * P^ 1 `/ Cross Refs : Croat Rett Pian Photos plan Photos • I Satlon I Notebook Section Notebook I I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I PROJECT : xrCOORDINATES PROJECT : axTf R— COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. Krz- ,/Mb STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.: _ LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR CULT.MAT. NOTES ' D 0'� S,wckt Ick-1 Init`1l9 NC.•,A AV i{ytvc-� o - I.3 Sallot,, �oann e ,.417 A; •M AP ' 2 1 I 2 '•LYG f C&A-Pd IL+N-l Iow `�, OP41 5-4 4 4 S S �I 6 � 6 7 T g 6 •Give depths relative to%round surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nous (Note If cult.matrrial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Noss If cult.martial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) S'rDpt,�A PA-1- Cross Refs : Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section + Notebook Seaton Notebook i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi / SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests r I PROJECT : COORDINATES Si IQU PROJECT : 6 .2 COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR. SFX��VA�TOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE' TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. 3 KaLnn �y Y/1/9y ),- A 14/ 4'd STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAdT. / NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES O.0 1.0 c�� Cat k'Cie odar¢t'ie �t 01:yon IoKA t "J7 M ,0���'� /I / t u �, (.o Sn�.l-I lo,,,� r1 C.a.! !iP rf.,.,a�.., .rl" 7` 1 C 10 cS/8 2 3 3 4 4 . S S I 6 6 7 � 8 S •Give depths relative to{round surface •Give depths relative to{round surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note if cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Crow RefsGots Refs s _ - Pian Photos Plan Photos Section : Notebook Seaton Notebook SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Augcr holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : {lor COORDINATES Xz PROJECT : ?A,,r&P COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAyATOR: SCREENED I DATE TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE qe W/W AND NO. : AND NO. STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES t 0 1.3 ,v y&4m f0Fr•72q- Id M 5,ao t I•¢ c,81.Jy /�t,,n v i�qlu vas- �� �lvn2��. 2 1.3 ! &rSt'cluw eqa, V7"71,r 'U41 ton 2 �a��'t(,,,�� hl /0/r�S 3 7 4 4 1 s 6 6 7 7 g 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes : (/Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes : (Note If cult.mawial retained,and if soil samples are taken.) r^4d el,/ Gots Refs : Crow Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Sealon Notebook Sealon Notebook ' I H SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tuts SURVEY RECORD SHEET : Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : dlc�� COORDINATES PROJECT rsf COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED t DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR; SCREENED T 711 : TEST TYPE AND NO. IC i ANDNO. RL KR-/MJ '�y I jzi9` A / STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY.I LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SUIT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR 9U LT.MAT. 1 U ' Iii ' NOTES Ictl �N fQrILC7 ' 2 0 1/' 1,�I Aj c�tiPMla1 iio�-� (oNN��b + I•U I �t 1tRl617 'PIC v1 la?yn 7 4 4 ! S 6 6 7 7 g a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Note (Note If cult.material realned,and If sail samples are Laken.) General Now : (Note If cult.material retained,and If sail samples are taken.) ljlljxa) u . Cross Refs : Crow Refs : Plan Photos Plan Photos i Section Notebook Sectlon ` Notebook I � SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES PROJECT : � � COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TESTTYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE Q AND NO. AND NO. A I /Z/1 19� Il K�r,hD STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT, NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES 1 0 0. 1,4' $s c) t r°+ ���..� IJc)�4I� NGM 1� KoMzc ' ° ' ''l/ Sk1�`-(c.r'� 'O in !!vc'`^ pflJ*wfda 10LIF-5A Nc"'1 a jp,ut� l 1 I i.b y Ioq�S/� 8rf.,�c,1 3 3 4 f 4 S S 6 6 7 7 a a •Give depth&relative to ground surface •Give depth$relative to ground surface General Nous (Note if cult.material retained,and If sod samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are ukan.) Cross Refs Crou Refs s s r Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Sectlon Notebook ' I I ' SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests I PRO IECT : COORDINATES PROJECT ; 6 AML— COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EX VATOR: SCREENED? DAT :, TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR. SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : AND NO. : /�'/ ji�9d' ��' ��IMD�4rl �ti�' 9/L�9N ST 14H STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES o.o -r•7 s-tea. 9 nlcn� (; Nvarf J Z / - !J lOnrsp tn1/ �Cd.v 1011r�Jr �rr1Cn 2 3 ! 3 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 s a •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) Cross We Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook I � r SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : n COORDINATES : sr z�' I PROJECT : � COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED I DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR. EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE k: AND NO. AND NO. '�`!�/ srrv� �'� K►�1.�0�i)l� %u" H I z/9H S.�c i STRATIGRAPHY.: j STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES 00- / 0 au � �yG>1� 0/r'J ilt,Vl �or.zu� i 1 P 1 /-o,$ Sa,,.,1r.` l0•...1 )0 4" /1N (CM rh61 r:��Loo•+,/ V r , Ce..pr}otad i� Icyu y fp z i•0_ l- - P''- / / Sly .UPS 3��(y,zo a a 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 8 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note if cult,material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) General Note (Note If cult,martial retained,and if soil samples are Laken.) Cross Refs Cross Refs Plan Photos Plan Photos Section ( Notebook Section Notebook I i SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel testi SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT : COORDINATES : PROJECT : COORDINATES ga,,Fr� SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXGVAT R: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. : �� /�/ %• A� K2/�ilnN I(N' q�t-�y`l ST 201 STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES 9 — �i�f ( 40 CCS I C�lG UGv) t +.u�-o•2i I�,...s��"`m�' nlc.� 0 rlj. j L G.6 c,(�Loo.vi i0rr'f!`1 . "( :( r•zw 2 o,2'-0,?' $a+d e n.ti NCM �{ rice sad CottM� J'aa� loar S/� ko•rcp. 7 '1 � �N� SG�I�r•%Sca-�� 4 4 S S 6 7 7 � 8 8 •Give depths relative to ground surface • Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and if soil temples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.maftrW retained,and if soil samples are taklen.) G I 1 Cron Refs : Cram Refs : � s r — plan Photos Plan Photos r i Section t' Notebook Section Notebook 1 i I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT g�eti COORDINATES PROJECT COORDINATES SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED? DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. AND NO. Ac K�Ima/I�,y /ti ql�l�N s.w y p.� X✓LIMDIprr I/H 9!; — s STRATIGRAPHY.: STRATIGRAPHY. LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR gULT.MAT. NOTES LAYER OEM• DESCRIPTION COLOR ;ULT.MAT. NOTES I Q.0 -0,7./ PCM 0 rleDYa ' I 2 O Zr. 01H AJ441 104^ Z' �y n� A K,.+a,,),) 2 Q•Z 0,4 A/✓^ R ii4�1-1.;-1 , GoA�"aTc 4+�y Y+� 10 ✓'r� � W k5K on 7 C 4- I, 7 ^ice �jtiso S � o. - .�r. y 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 a a • Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Notes (Note if cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) General Notes (Note If cult.material retained,and If soil samples are taken.) Y Cross Refs : Gots Refs t s Plan Photos Plan Photos i Session Notebook Section ' Notebook � I SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests SURVEY RECORD SHEET Postholes,Auger holes,Shovel tests PROJECT ; a PROJECT : 7zivrtar COORDINATES : —gr ern COORDINATES SITE : SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR: SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE SITE: SUPERVISOR: EXCAVATOR i SCREENED T DATE: TEST TYPE AND NO. g C X)OI-D SDN AND NO. . �L K��� ✓ " YY� 7 y Si"c'u 5 yrzce STRATIGRAPHY STRATIGRAPHY.: LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR LAYER DEPTH• DESCRIPTION COLOR SULT.MAT. NOTES SULT.MAT. NOTES aI I ��V'_ O•L' )l•�^'�%�til 4.�cr M'.11 I - 2 'IUMi�) L`1� 4V /�/.}�- /U('/U 0l�i:r1C.1 137 loir J /�LA/1 /� H�•cl2o.� 7 j �> / I. cc r tu.»`7 I5�S 1Ga1 3 1.7 Coe LzwMy�„ SA.,1� P V �a1t.��D1� 4 4 S S 6 7 7 a g •Give depths relative to ground surface •Give depths relative to ground surface General Nates (Note If cultGeneral Notes (Nate If cult.material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) .material retained,and if soil samples are taken.) Crou Refs : Croce Rich s s Plan PhotosPlan Photos Section Notebook Section Notebook APPENDIX 1 CONTEXT NUMBERING AND PROVENIENCE LABELING A field recording system which encompasses a variety of conditions and situations is optimal for any archaeological project. Among these situations are the size of the project, the number of different field techniques and the number of expected artifacts. The field recording system used was developed by Greenhouse Consultants and was based on modifications of other accepted systems. All contexts are numbered in the field and these numbers are applied to the artifacts. The format for numbering is XX-9999.99 where X is alphanumeric and 9 is numeric. The alphanumeric characters to the left of the hyphen are the prefix. The two digits to the right of the decimal point are used only when it is necessary to refer to strata within a context. The four digits between the prefix and decimal subdivision may be called the base code. The prefix is a two character designation of the project parcel. The four digit numeric base code can be divided into two parts; the first digit being separate from the last three. The first numeric digit indicates the type of field technique used. The codes are as follows: 1. unprovenienced surface collection 2. provenienced surface collection 3. shovel testing 4. trenching 5. excavation units 6. feature excavation The three digits following the technique code are unique for each location and are assigned sequentially. Decimal subdivisions may be used for techniques three through six to indicate specific strata. For example, 01-3001.02 refers to Area 1 (01), shovel test (3), number 1 (001), at the second layer (.02). I APPENDIX 2 ARTIFACT INVENTORY APPENDIX 2 COMPLETE ARTIFACT INVENTORY TABLES FOR CODING MATERIAL CULTURE A. Table for National Park Service Material Culture Data Base Coding Chart: Groups, Classes and Material B. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Groups and Classes C. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Prehistoric Artifacts - Class and Morphology D. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Ambiguous Items of Material Culture APPENDIX 2 A. Tablefor National Park Service Material Culture Data Base Coding Chart: Groups,Classes and Materials GROUPS AND CLASSES MATERIALS- COMMON LIST(CLASSIFIED) 01 KITCHENGROUP 09 ACTIVTIES GROUP INORGANIC MATERIALS ORGANIC MATERIALS 01 Dishes 01 Construction tools 02 Containers 02 Farm tools CERAMIC CELLULOSIC 03 Tableware 03 Leisure activities 001 Porcelain 115 Bark 04 Kitchenware 04 Fishinggear 002 Stoneware 108 Burlap 05 — 003 Earthenware 128 Charcoal 02 FAUNAL/FLORALGROUP 06 — 004 Whiteware/Ironstone/granite 092 Cork 01 Mammalia 07 Pottery class 134 Undifferentiated ceramic 087 Cotton 02 Ares 08 Storage Items 131 Fiberboard/masonite 03 Reptilia 09 — CLAY 085 Hemp 04 Amphibia 10 Stable and barn 047 Clay 011 Paper 05 Pisces 11 Miscellaneous hardware 062 Kaolin 006 Wood 09 Ethnofaunal/Zoological 12 Specialized activities 079 Red clay 121 Celluloseseeds/ 16 Ethnobotanical 13 Military objects seed covering 14 1 luuaokaoping CONSTRUCT ION W ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 15 Public services 069 Brick CONSTRUCTION 01 Window glass 071 Cement 093 Asphalt 02 Nails 10 PREHISTORIC GROUP 070 Mortar 125 Formica 03 Spikes 01 Hunting and fishing activities 072 Plaster 101 Linoleum 04 Door&Window hardware 02 Domestic activities 102 Tarpaper 05 Other structural hardware 03 Stoneworking GLASS 06 Construction materials 04 Woodworking 013 Mllkglass WAX 05 Digging tools 078 Glass 076 Wax 04 FURNITURE GROUP 06 Other fabricating or processing tools 112 Slag and clinker 01 Hardware 07 Other general utility tools GUM/RESIN 02 Materials 08 Ceremonial&ornamental METALS 010 Rubber,elastic 03 Lightingdevice 09 Miscellaneous 005 Tin 009 Rubber,hard 04 Decorative furnishings 019 Silver 11 SAMPLES 021 Gold PETROCHEMICALS 05 ARMS GROUP — Charcoal samples for radiocarbon 026 Cuprousmetal 073 Carbon 01 Projectiles dating 028 Ferrous alloy 095 Coal 02 Cartridge case — Flotation samples 029 Aluminum 048 Graphite 03 Arms accessories light fraction 032 Steel 116 Tar 04 Gun parts heavy fraction 034 Lead — Soil samples 035 Chrome PROTEIN 06 CLOTHING GROUP 096 Mercury 118 Chitin(arthropod, exoskeleton) 01 Apparel 98 UNSPECIFIED GROUP 136 Undifferentiated metal 106 Felt 02 Ornamentation 122 Flesh 03 Making and repair STONE 016 Hair 04 Fasteners 129 Agate 117 Keratin(horns/fingernali/claws) 075 Asbestos 015 Leather 07 PERSONAL GROUP 133 Chalk 107 Silk 01 Coins 052 Chert 090 Sponge,natural 02 Keys 042 Granite 105 Wool 03 Writing paraphernalia 046 04 Grooming and hygiene 109 et vel COMBINATION MATERIALS 05 Personal ornamentation 038 Limestone 017 Bone 06 Other personal Items 041 Marble 132 Ivory 049 Mica 067 Pearl 08 TOBACCO PIPE GROUP 058 Obsidian 089 Shell 01 Kaolin pipe class 057 Ochre 02 Nonkaolin pipe 068 Precious stone SYNTHETIC MATERIALS 03 Smoking accessories 053 Quartz 103 Celluloid 054 Quartzite 088 Nylon 039 Sandstone 008 Plastic 044 Shale 077 Soap 040 Slate 091 Sponge, synthetic 060 Steatite 104 Synthetic 043 Schist 126 Undifferentiated stone TEXTILE 151 Undifferentiatecitextile APPENDIX 2 B. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Groups and Classes GROUPS AND CLASSES GROUPS ANDCLASSES 01 KITCHEN SAMPLE ARTIFACTS 08 TOBACCO PIPE GROUP 01 Dishes Plate,cup,saltcellar 01 Kaolln pipe Kaolin pipe 02 Containers Bottle glass fragments 05 Nonkaolin pipe Corncob pipe 03 Tableware Eating utensils 06 Smoking accessories Snuff tin,cuspidor,tobacco tin,pipe cleaner 04 Kitchenware Cooking utensils,pot, kettle 02 FAUNAL/FLORALGROUP 09 ACTIVITIES GROUP 01 Construction tools Axe head,drill bit,saw,paintbrush 01 Mammalla Mammal 02 Farm tools Hoe, rake,plowblade 02 Aves Bird 03 Leisure activities Marbles,jew's harp,doll parts 03 Reptilia Reptile 04 Fishinggear Fishhooks,sinkers,crab trap 04 Amphlbia Amphibian 05 -- 05 Pisces Fish 06 — 09 Other ethnofaunal/zoological Oyster,crab,egg shells 07 Pottery class Indian waterjar,effigy pot 16 Ethnobotanical Seeds,nuts 08 Storage Items Crock,barrel staves,sacks 09 — 03 ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 10Stable and barn Stirrup,horseshoe,rein,harness belt 01 Window glass Windowpane glass 11 Miscellaneous hardware Rope, bolts,nuts,washers,chain 02 Nails Nails 12 Specialized activities Button blanks,metallurgic debris,saggars 03 Spikes Railroad spikes 13 Military objects Insignia, bayonets 04 Door&Window hardware Doorknob,doorhinge 14 Housekeeping Broom,coathanger, washboard 05 Other Structural hardware Pipe,fireplace tiles 15 Public services Sewer pipe, water pipe 06 Construction materials Brick,mortar,roofing 10 PREHISTORIC GROUP 04 FURNITURE GROUP 01 Hunting and Fishing Projectile point, ataltl hook 01 Hardware Handle,drawer pull,latch 02 Domestic Vessel,mortar,pestle 02 Materials Stoveparts,chairpart, bedframe 03 Stoneworking Hammerstone,baton,flake, core 03 Lightingdevice Candlestick,lamp base 04 Woodworking Celt,grooved axe 04 Decorative furnishings Flowerpot,clock parts,vase 05 DlggingToois Hoe 05 ARMS GROUP 06 Other fabricating or processing Drill,chisel,needle tools 01 Projectiles Shot, bullets 07 Othergeneral utilitytools Knife, prismatic blade,chopper 02 Cartridge case Cartridge 08 Ceremonial&ornamental Sheet, gorget,bead 03 Arms accessories Gun flints, bullet molds,powderhorn 09 Miscellaneous Function unknown 04 Gun parts Pistol barrel,flintlock assembly 06 CLOTHING GROUP 01 Apparel Hat,coat,scarves,glove,shoe 02 Ornamentation Beads, sequin, hatpin,feather 03 Making and Repair Thimble,straightpin,scissors 04 Fasteners Buttons,snaps,buckles,cufflink 07 PERSONAL GROUP 01 Coins Coins 02 Keys Doorlockkeys,padlock keys 03 Writing paraphernalia Quill, fountain pen nib,graphite pencil 04 Grooming&hygiene Hairbrush,razor,mirror,tweezers 05 Personal ornamentation Jewelry,ribbon,ornamental comb 06 Other personal items Pocketwatch,keychain, pocketknife APPENDIX 2 C. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Prehistoric Artifacts - Class and Morphology Class 01: Hunting and Fishing Class 06: Other Fabricating or Activities Processing Tools 01 - Projectile point 51 - Perforator 02 - Birdstone 52 - Drill 03 - Bannerstone 53 -Awl 04 - Boatstone 54 - Reamer 05 - Fish hook 55 - Chisel 06 - Netsinker 56 - Microperforator 07 -Atlatl hook 57 - Needle 58 - Graver Class 02: Domestic Activities Class 07: General Utility Tools 13 -vessel 14 - mortar 67 - Knife 15 - pestle 68 - Side scraper 16 - muller 69 - Core scraper 17 - groundstone fragment 70 - Stemmed end scraper 71 - Other end scraper 73 - Prismatic blade Class 03: Stone Working 74 - Chopper 75 - Utilized/Retouched flake 21 - Hammerstone 76 - Pitted pebble 22 - Baton 77 - Gouge 23 -Tine 78 - Maul 24 - Splinter 79 - Abrader 25 - Drift or "punch" 80 - Whetstone 26 -Anvil 81 - Biface 27 - Flake, primary 82 -Adze 28 - Flake, secondary 83 - Distolateral scraper 29 - Bifacial thinning flake 84 - Bifacial end scraper 30 - Core 85 - Bifacial scraper 31 - Blank 32 -Tested piece Class 08: Ceremonial & Ornamental Objects Class 04: Wood Working 85 -Angled pipe 37 - Celt 86 - Tube 38 - Grooved axe 87 - Platform pipe 39 - Spokeshave 88 - Cloud blower pipe 89 - Sheet 90 - Plates Class 16: Ethnobotanical 91 - Comb 92 - Bead Seeds 93 - Gorget Nuts - - Hematite - - Ochre APPENDIX 2 D. Table for Data Base Coding Chart: Ambiguous Items of Material Culture Note: The items listed below may be ambiguous or hard to place in a taxonomic category, but as a convention, for inventory purposes, will be coded as follows: Unidentified wood fragments 98 00 006 Construction wood 03 06 006 Pegs, Wood planks 03 06 006 Twigs, branches 09 16 006 Burned wood (partial) Code as wood (above) and put"burnt wood" in the comments section Charcoal and all small fragments of completely burnt wood Code as charcoal Coal 98 00 095 Slag, burned coal, vitrified metalworking or manufacturing by-products 98 00 112 Pantiles 03 06 003 Delft fireplace tiles, wall skirting, etc. 04 04 003 Porcelain bathroom tiles, other bathroom furniture (tub, toilet, etc.) 03 05 001 Chamber pot 04 02 00- Flowerpot 04 04 00200- Teeth 02 -- 132 Fish scales 02 09 118 Coral 04 04 119 Eggshell 02 09 119 Seeds, seed covering 02 16 121 Schist (construction) 03 06 043 Schist (unidentified) 98 00 043 Red brick 03 06 169 Yellow brick 03 06 155 Linoleum 03 06 101 Metal hardware (probably construction) 03 06 ( ) Furniture hardware 04 01 ( ) Miscellaneous hardware (other and unidentified 09 11 ( ) including screws, car parts) Leather shoe parts 06 01 015 Unidentified leather scraps 98 00 015 Leather personal items 07 Q 015 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 1001 Cat# Conteh Go Cl Morph Mat Ide Count Comments Reference Range Disc 1001 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 1002 Cat# Conte Go CI Morph Mat Identi Count Comments Reference Range 40 1002 10 03 030 053 Core 1 Quartz;Location:northern field west of Lot 30 in planned vineyard Subtotal= 1 Context. 1003 Cat# Conteh GG2 Cl Moroh Mat Iden Count Comments Reference Range 41 1003 01 03 028 053 Secondary flake 1 Quartz;Location:northern field west of Lot 29 in planned vineyard Subtotal= 1 Context. 1004 Cat# Context GG2 Cl Morph Mat Identity Count Comments. Reference Range Disc 1004 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 1005 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identi Count Comments Reference Range 42 1005 10 07 071 053 Endscraper 1 Quartz;Location:planned buffer -- between northern field and Lot 29 Subtotal= 1 Context. 1006 Cat# Context G2 CI Mores Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range Disc 1006 Discarded Subtotal= Context 1007 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 2 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 1007 cats Context GR CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Rance 43 1007 10 01 001 052 Projectile point 1 Grey chert:Distal end of serrated Ritchie 1971:29,126,131; Late Archaic blade;Location:west of drainage Fogelman 1988.54 3500-2000 B.C. area in northern field;Narrow bladed/stemmed compkmc Lamoka/Bare IslandNVading River/Squibnocket Stemmed Subtotal= 1 Context. 1008 Cat* Context Gp Cl Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Range Disc 1008 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 1009 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Range Disc 1009 Discarded Subtotal= Conteh. 1010 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range 44 1010 10 01 001 053 Projectile point 1 Quartz;Triangular isoceles serrated Ritchie 1971:29,126,131; Late Archaic: blade;Location:Lot 28; Fogelman 198854 3500-2000 B.C. Lamoka/Bare Island/Wading River/Squibnocket Stemmed Subtotal= 1 Context 1071 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range Disc 1011 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 1012 BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 3 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 1012 Cat# Context GR C1 Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 45 1012 01 02 017 126 Groundstone 1 Heated;Location:northern field fragment west of drainage area Subtotal= 1 Context. 1077 Cat# Context GG2 CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range 1 1077 09 08 078 Glass lid 1 Candy/condiment bowl;Purplish tint;Press molded rim 2 1077 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Paneled 3 1077 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Condiment jar,Screw top; Jones&Sullivan 1985:39 1904+ Automatic machine made;BALL 4 1077 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Cobalt blue;Strapped flask shape 5 1077 09 10 004 028 Horseshoe 1 w/nails 6 1077 09 10 004 028 Horseshoe 1 7 1077 Ot Of 004 White graniteware 1 Hotelware;Green banded;Maker's Lerner 1988:417;290-92 1907+ mark James M.SK.JNew Y Witrif..,James M.Shaw&Co., NY,NY;Agency for D.E.McNicol Pottery,East Liverpool, Ohio/Clarksburg,West Virginia 8 1077 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Screw top;Condiment;Automatic Jones&Sullivan 1985:39 1904+ machine made 9 1077 O1 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Screw top w/metal cap;Automatic Jones&Sullivan 1985:39 1904+ machine made Subtotal= 9 Context. 3003.02 Cat# Context GGp Cl Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range 46 3003.02 98 128 Charcoal 1 47 3003.02 10 02 013 047 Prehistoric ceramics 6 Bag labeled A horizon,no bag for B horizon 48 3003.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flakes 2 Quartz;Labeled A horizon,no bag for B horizon 49 3003.02 Ot 03 028 053 Secondary flake 1 Quartz;Labeled A horizon,no bag for B horizon Subtotal= 10 Context. 3013 03 BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 4 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3013 03 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 50 3013.03 10 02 126 Fire-cracked rock 2 51 3013-03 10 03 027 053 Primary flake 1 Quartz Subtotal= 3 Context. 3013.04 Cat# Context GGt Cl Morph Mat klentit Count Commends Reference Range 52 3013.04 10 02 126 Fire-cracked rock 1 53 301304 10 07 081 053 Biface fragment 1 Quartz:Proximal end;Convex base; Wisniewski&Gwynne 1962; Late Archaic Broad expanding stem;Preform to Ritchie 1959 Broad-Stemmed Comer-Notched point 54 301304 10 03 028 053 Secondary fakes 5 Quartz Subtotal= 7 Context: 3025.01 Cat# Context Gg CI Morph Mat Identi Count Commends Reference Ranae 55 3025.01 01 01 001 Porcelain 1 Molded interior Subtotal= 1 Context. 3026.02 Cat# Context GGp Cl Morph Mat Identity Count Commends Reference Range 56 3026.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake 1 Quartz 57 302602 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 2 Quartz Subtotal= 3 Context. 3033.04 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 58 303304 10 07 068 053 Srdescraper 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Context. 3035 03 BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 5 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Contex . 3035.03 Cat# Context G2 CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Rance 59 3035.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 2 Quartz Subtotal= 2 Context. 3036.03 Cat# Context G2 CI Morph Mat Identi Count Commends Reference Range Disc 3036.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3037.02 Cat# Context 9k CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 60 303702 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 3 Quartz Subtotal= 3 Context. 3037.03 at# Context GR CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 61 3037.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 2 Quartz Subtotal= 2 Context. 3038.03 Cat# Context GR CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 62 3038.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 7 Quartz Subtotal= 7 Context. 3039.02 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range Disc 3039.02 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3039.03 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 6 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3039.03 Cat# Context Go CI Morph Mat Identit v Count Commerrls Reference Rance Disc 303903 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3040.03 Cat# Context G2 CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Rance Diu 3040.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3046.02 Cat# Conte GR CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Rance Disc 3046.02 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3050 Cat# Conte PR CI Morph Mat Identit v Count Comments Reference Ranoe Disc 3050 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3069.02 Cat# Context GR Cl Moron Mat Identit v Count Comments Reference Range 63 3069.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake 1 Quartz 64 3069.02 01 01 004 White earthenware 1 Subtotal= 2 Context. 3069 03 Cat# Context P2 CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Range Disc 306903 Discarded Subtotal= Context, 3076 02 1 BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 7 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3076.02 Cat# Context GG2 C1 Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Ran- 10 3076.02 08 04 137 Belt buckle 1 11 3076.02 09 11 028 Miscellaneous 1 hardware Subtotal= 2 Context: 3077.01 Cat# Context 92 C1 Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Ran- 12 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 2 Cobalt blue 13 3077.01 01 02 078 Container glass 1 Olive green 14 3077.01 01 02 078 Container glass 2 Amber 15 3077.01 09 08 002 Stoneware 1 Grey paste;Albany slip interior 16 3077.01 01 01 004 White graniteware 1 17 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Base 18 3077.01 04 03 078 Lighting glass 1 19 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Stippled base 20 3077.01 03 01 078 Flat glass 1 Light green 21 3077.01 03 01 078 Flat glass 1 22 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 23 3077.01 01 02 078 Container glass 1 Aqua 24 3077.01 01 01 004 White graniteware 1 Makefs mark underglaze stamped Kovel 8 Kovel 1986:11 p; 1895.1900 black;Glasgow Pottery Co.,John Lerner 1988:172-3;DeBolt Moses&Co.,Trenton,NJ 1988:33-34 1859-1906;Mark-ra.1895-1900 25 3077.01 01 01 001 Porcelain 1 Base;Maker's mark undergtaze Thorn 1974:7#37;Kovel S 1879-1900 stamped green;R.Delinieres 8 Co, Kovel 1986:170a Lemoges,France 26 3077.01 04 04 013 Milk glass 4 27 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Paneled 28 3077.01 01 02 078 Container glass 12 29 3077.01 01 02 078 Bottle glass 1 Patent lip 30 3077.01 01 01 004 White graniteware 9 31 3077.01 O1 02 029 Can 2 32 307701 01 02 032 Saltfpepper shaker 1 cap 33 3077.01 09 11 028 Wire 1 34 3077.01 06 01 015 Leather 1 35 3077.01 02 09 089 Shell 3 36 30T701 04 03 025 Lamp base 1 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 8 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3077 01 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identi Count Comments Reference Rana* 37 307701 09 11 025 Miscellaneous 1 hardware 38 307701 04 01 028 Bracket 1 39 3077.01 09 11 073 Carbon battery 2 Subtotal= 56 Context. 3081.02 Cat# Context 92 CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Ranoe Disc 3081.02 Discarded Subtotal= Conten: 3084.02 Cat# Conte GRCI Morph Mat ldenti Count Comments Reference Rance 65 3084.02 01 01 003 Peartware? 1 Brown 1982:5.17-18,South 1779-1840 1972.Figure 1 Subtotal= 1 Context. 3085.02 Cat# Context GR q Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range 66 3085 02 10 03 030 053 Core 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Context. 3134.03 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range Disc 3134.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context 3135 03 Cat# Context 992 CI Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 67 313503 10 03 027 053 Primary flake 1 Quartz,Rest in bag discarded Subtotal= 1 I ' BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 9 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3138.02 at# Context Gg CI Morph Mat Identit v Count Commends Reference Range 88 3138.02 10 03 027 053 Primary flake 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Contex . 3137.03 Cat# Context pp CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Range Diu 3137.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3139.03 Cat# Context Gp G Morph Mat Identit v Count Comments Reference Ranae 89 3139.03 10 03 028 053 Secondaryflake 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Context. 3141.02 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Range 70 3141.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 8 Quartz;Bag says A Horizon ST 140 Subtotal= e Context. 314103 Cat# Context gR Cl Morph Mat Identity Count Comments Reference Range 71 3141.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary fakes 15 Quartz Subtotal= b Context. 3142 02 Cat# Context Go CI Morph Mat Identit Count Comments Reference Rance 72 3142.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Context. 314303 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 10 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3143.03 Cat# Conteh Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Ranae Disc 3143.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3145.03 Cat# Conte Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Commutes Reference Range Disc 3145-03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3149.03 at# Conte Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Commerft Reference Ranoe 73 3149.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flake 1 Quartz Subtotal= 1 Context. 3152.02 Cat# Conte GR CI Morpn Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Ranoe 74 3152.02 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 2 Quartz Subtotal= 2 Context. 3152.03 Cat# Conteh Gg CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range 75 3152.03 10 03 028 053 Secondary flakes 3 Quartz Subtotal= 3 Context. 3176 03 Cat# Context Gp CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Rance Disc 317603 Discarded Subtotal= '• Context 3179 03 I BAXTER 1 B ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Page 11 SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK ARTIFACT INVENTORY Context. 3179.03 Cat# Context GG2 CI Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range Disc 3179.03 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3185.01 Cat# Conteh Go CI Morph Mat Identi Count Commends Reference Range Disc 3185.01 Discarded Subtotal= Context. 3190.01 Cat# Context Gp G Morph Mat Identitv Count Comments Reference Range Disc 3190.01 Discarded Subtotal= Total = 149 r r r a, I �• �r�:.3 ��.,� f - `- I J .0 L?i1 Ll I t _ iii:. ri: t 3 C } i)t' ' I i.j,9! l t / h ! ( JI . -7_' - 7 1 r �I I g - i:u'.z1r 1 I .. _ . _ 9 `� J _ I � __ {�rniny _�� . 1\ ) - - - I- - II I i'n4ini fri-.`,_ .: `\ • 11 "jf .. ., „ ..z--"), ! .'. ,/.:t.l - !_ 1 !!?' 1, ()/ 11 -?-'u—•uryjrt� Y no`Jj/ or fort ,early / IL _--. --_-. .. li ---- _- -._ - --- -__._ —q . \ N��r`_h Fors Coluntry (Club _ �- ---- ;` DO v CR a _- i_ - _- -. __ t —_�J - t �-'� '' �� P. 0. Dox tor. ' I i t ^ A3 C y SO tha(t� .to l L-19t5R 1 now or formerly ` I _ (51st sts.> I C entry Club Esta�es Property Owners / - ---- - ----- - - - f ! I ( ,� j - / � - --- - - --_ _ _ - -- _ - -wvw�.,- I 1-_ I now or former) _ - fc: I Leri I y - - - - - " _ N _~1'-� now tJti c r r m y Stephen A. & _ _ - __ - - - I, ! 0 1 Hadley B. WlillamS j - 11 �} to 5 �I -- - Susan L. Kaelin - - - _ - - - - _ - I - - lq- - ao 82300 SF 8C V�,ie I _ __ __ -- - . _ _ _ - _-- � 0 1now rmer , - 1 _- - o `� �� o o r f o i ` 89900 SF 82500 SF c , I.- . I H c J!-_,,, B- W'!1 1 am S & \ I I 0 _­ __ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - +� . Wheatley- Wi, !ams .1 a - - - - _ -- -- _ - -- — — -- — �, Y.,, r•,� ~ -_- _ I o - 8 > \ ❑ _ -- -- ___ � '�__.- ___ - — _ - - __ __--�__ - - . _ - _ ! - � 9 O I i f ,�'+ r \ E t l., ; i c I ` \y -_ _ - _ x� �` ✓ PROPOSED TRAIL �-� _ 4. 1 v o 80300 S} ° _ 2�3 _ i II , 80600 SF r i` � ta<t,` �^ ' - -_ - - - - - - - _- - FORT 91500 SF T . -- -- -__ -- _ 32 f_+ o< des _ ' v _ -- _- _-- - - 7 - = / ' o'' 3f 5 // 5ib _ - - __ __ _ SITE . (3 e`e . _ - - -- - -. _�, ( 242'+ T f - yy;\� j�co �x - - __ _- I _ - - �F - - -- - _ _- - - � ` - _ — O Is - - ) _ - 2 I _ �� - ; - --- - -_ - - - -- L - _ _ _- _ -- -- - ` _ _ _ _ _ 15 323 ` N�, k - J _- - -- _ -I - _ j/_ - - - ri - - _ �- _� � - _ S1 1. s ryf� �� 15. :; �� -- - - - - - _ _ - t3 - - \\ - _ -- - - __ __ - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - - -_ _ 205 \ , - ` - �� _ - - - - - -- ___ -- _ - - _ _ _ _ 7- - - _- -- - - _ -_ _ _- - o - _� cs 166400 SE \ �' y It I _ -- 7i K - __ _ ' _ _ . __ _ _ _ - __ � a. , - \ moo,-. _ H a ,I y U. f _ -, - Zo \ ` \X e B. Williams :' \ - / rill e _ & - - - �/� - - - �. i r Z4 ; _ ,' n :- i" r ! j � / 200' I \ _ NO t , 'f1 — _ - i / - TOWN PARK - s — — _ -- �- ` gj��.Ir � --- - _ _ _- _= � _ f - _ _ 37.47 ACRES OSTjs � __ - -- - -- _- -- - - - _ 617' _ I � \ \ _= _ . \ �\ 4�/ t = �-- ! \ - ! _ - U' 0 220 O ( I \ 1 - __ - . V \\ .— --- �— � _ - --\ ` ' —, -- —_ `/ 288' \ _ - --- _ _ 92800 SF s, E 4FT i3� \ // Jam, - — — — - .6 ` a t° W) I \� 270'± J J / - - 15 i M / - �, i 11 _ 80200 SF i - °--°----0_- f FORT CUTCHOGUE \ i 127400 SF - (.11 '1 I` °�°/° °\ INTERPRETIVE CENTER 14 U' t °� \ \ 1 *JF� I - , _ .-- 81200 SF i°� 82600 SF i°�° ° I J� _ I ) iI .1t = 9) CA -_ . j� i ' I � - __ ___ - sT33 o , p ° ° / - � 82300 SF - �� '°-® 5 ' P'DDOCK 'a'h ,� ,� -` \\ H O U S E ° 40 \ / / I _ �� _ ,��___JJff''���� � a _- `` '� ��titi'.•�.-•.' -1 _ _ - •1'�'.��. _ _ i_'.i' \ oho--o�.o�o�o _O �o�i°f '^( > _ // / . = - --- j it �� _- - - ,` .iy-ice��`~ - _ - - _'__!-'r-�,` --r�-- 100' �O�y\ \O`_O/ !Q o - 1. 03 1 • - - _�.'r �r-ti Y', _ _ ��r'�'W.:',r�� _ \ NOTE: ❑ 1 ,� - ,�- -r -Y - - - - - - - _ i r/ - = - - - _ _ �I �� ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE APPDXIMA ISD r "mss^' - - -- - --� _ -r - - l� \ Z FROM -'y _ -•tJ`_1_ - __- ___in_^.___-t_L_._ ___�_�� _11..�'v!\_^ _ _ _ - v_ _l�-,v__�`_ _•L_iV_____/ 1 _ _ _- - , i - �tiw=, �t -_-_- - - - _ ( °_° ED BY OTHERS c WVM TOPOGRf PHICAL MAPS PREPAR AND ARE - -r- V R �- -,- r F R - 11 - - - - ED M - - - - - - -- - - - - - 0 A - - - - - - - -.,-, - E N S A - -- - E V - - - - - -- - - LE EL DA TUM. :iY - - 11 CK -- 2 .. o I Ir P O 0 --_-_'_tom---_-11 -`_ B ___ � _ .._- ._ __�_ -___� _ _._� v _- _ --- _ ._ .__i_,�_v__._ - �J���_`-..-_ _.__ - .. _ v_ _-_ - -Y Yom:-'.'�'-- '✓�':-' v-ti- 1..1 _ _ \ - � v .. -. - r .-� �. , .-�. r .. . _,-.. _. _.__ _r-•,:- - --_�i_v- ^.r-'.- �.-�r-'.-,,.- -�-✓-.._v-ti�:'�. :.,Y`rv✓•.,�. --r-:-- - - :�, - - - - - r - _ ._ - _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ter.. _ _ ___ --s` - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ r I Jay(`- _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ v ._. -_ v _ _ _ _ _ - �- O - - ..�.-,4v-:'-•.ter-'-/__'-�`,^:�v'-4'1.- .V. `- - - _ - - -- - - - - - O ( ) Y�_-JLC^_ � ��- - _.- ^�� _ _.: ��< _� _-_. � .. _ _. '/`_�. _ ..ti -" - - -- _ _ .-.:- .. . . - - - - - -Y`-'-•.- �! '!- '�!�'� V _. � '�-,:_ _ _ � � � _. i `. _ rh','�-'ter. - -- - - -ri-- (2 _ v � - _'�� ✓ - _ _ .-_ .-.. _2` •fes' /, - - o 4 -'-.r-.. -.rte - - -"'.F'.•�,'lr_"`:-'-.'fir-v^ .,-.r..__ _/'. _ t=_:'`.` .L_,-��mss__ __ - _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ �_ _ _ VINEYARD O _ _ 67 - _ A _ CR - _.. E S - /v v- I -tip __ _- __ _. - - - -- ' - - - - - - - 1 � - ___ f - OSS 8L - v__ ,. �.:� , _ _ .. - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ VINEYARD - - - - - - - _ _ � -_ -rel ^f v',- TU R FU E o 0 -•�. -r-' .r- o -r I I __ __- -_,v__J__ _ _ ._ ___ ___ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ HOU S TE r _ _ �i - - - _ - 1 _.�- `ham- _ _ rim-• V � w I IN �=., � _ � �./ F �- - ,. �- ., 9 - - - -- r. R _ - - - - ET�+, _ \ V _ _ o _ O I=R F CEN -. -r. -.- -. r .- - -.-:-.- ~: tip- �r .v _ �. - _ _ ___ _ -._ - - - o _ _ /` _. .. _ v _ _ � �- _ _ \rte, _ 1_ \ \_ �.� _J_ - - - - ~r'�!-_ ~'s .- - - .1 ✓vim _ � _ .� r. t � 1 _ yy r� -.�.--.� - ..f �.-, I _ - _ L P - - - - - - - - 1. T.. I r ___ __ _ A R S r .-: - 9 s C E ``" - - - - 1. I �. - .. S T __ _ , . _ _ �._ _- _ .� - - - Hous_ 7:1 DA _ _ - - - v _ _ _.� /��J r -� -{, - - -v - -�r- a I�.: Y - - __ --,v_h J v ___\, - - _ _ - _ __ _� __ -r-r ^r T 1 z r- -r� r, ✓v tt -- - r-'rte." -.r-..-- `� _ �.... __ - .":-� - � ------. -,ter-,---. - - - - ,� .,TA ,r- i - _ _ i ,� - - - -�,-v�r-�'., ��`r��l�^.^r --•.'-vim✓'.*' _ � _ 2 I �r l -4 �� `.- - ."aim.._ -�....W--. -•N.-✓-.:� _ o _ __ _ .__ _ ._ - - - - - --r-,ter-,-.-r-. -�,ti'- _ - _ �` - 3. .. E - - - - - _Z. l _ L S I _ v .l _ -r,--:-- - - - :--1- r-'r- -'r- - - --_ - .'�,-�. .ter-.:-rte,--.� `-\ __ __ �v-___ .�. _ _ __ _- � _� '�' _ �_.J.rT_ -_ _will- _ "^_J•_f`+•-_`--��-_�`--__T_�`I'_1__`__•�\/v�\ �- -- �. T T, -_ _ ___---_ - � _ _ .-•-_•-L� _•_T__L. __-_.__�,__"__�.�_s__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ZONING USE DISTICT •KM/E .y-.rl._ - - -P-r--t.-,�r� -- -.r:,- - - _ --..-v-•: - - - v.-,-1.-,.v, �,-�:- --- - .�.-,�:-ti��,-,�' s �_! �_ _- _ { -_ _- -- -- \ _- ._ __ _ __ .. __ v _ ^ r _. _ -` - - - - - - - - - - �- — I -_ - 18.84 ACRES _v -� i -_ . _ _ ___. v•_. ___ . ...-^__-- _y.._- v __ . 848'+ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — A-C AGRICULTURAL CONSERV,aTION UN I - -•r'T-v^v-/-`!�':^F-r---ver^-,-.-,.�-..-,. - -r--,�.--,ray----r_.-�;,.-, - - - - - -.,-.f-`,, -r-'.• .,,,,,--.�•..--•.,�.--, ,,-.,-.,- _ / , �. i 055'- / 4 n /�'v___.____-11 _-__._-1:1_�vi�_•y`_ __ ice_v: _�- __.__ ____-_-_f_�ti/•__ __..__�J -.`_J`.f-+- ✓l_;Z, __�'LA.i\i v_,`___'L�1\.�1_/•______�1`^�-'� -_v_iv 1 - F ooe� `-`"f j 8�---r-'. - - -�-.,-- -r;.-.,--w; =�-Y - -- - - - -- -- - -- -.-;- - - --- `v-.r-.r�• �r�✓-✓ ;'r-� •,- -•ry Y -•r1 / / / t -I -}`t ,i �� v"�'�-+._'.�-� ., -1-'LA -�., �.-ti-v -..-1'- �'v_ __ .. ���_\..^-.----�_.`--�+\t�h ___.__• ... _�✓_-1_ _- •-v`�, _� ,v_ - v- f v .n •-. n"n w'' n �'l._'_t - ^__ _I_i_ �.�^i\/�J.i`_� _:`✓v- ^ . •_i`-1I._•v^_^_..'._.r`J ' / I / / - --r-rte. - - ----,, -.r-.,^ --.-�- -- -,r--, - --I-_-_-_-,-.--.- _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - -r..�^ - - �.'�.-•.- - -' - _ __ -.� -_ L �ii��_v� • . - • - - -'r--.:-.�,�r .--..-,.ter-,- -- - -•r-r.,-�.-,ter.`.r-'�.�.`- - -- -.r"-r-- .. :^-v i- ^r-`.-r-r--'.- ^y-- �.`\.-rr.,-r.-,• /� / _� � . t • •�Ix -_K-. ��^�ti l�^__- ^_.`_^_^�,�-.\_^_/• _�-•.A-__ _ti.'•_-•✓`_--.��`-^__`--� t--__^__^-`�^__...._.___ _ __=`-_\Jv1_.•_,.:f_ 1J.-'l.-`__• ___-.-P_J_`__• 1__^_:_-^_._v_-ti J` / ,! - -\ , I _r �. _ ..� :_-�'i.r\.� _�- _.- _ _ _ -_ �..:h' ____ _ __ ��-•_:_ ire__- .'_'Li`_.r., - vv\i\_^_..- .. ,-__ O ❑_ i , i]�+ moi^ _-_�`.i•_'ti��.___tip` - - _ _ _ 11 , }J�/�p 0", , ^'rte-Y-�f�- -vr-J-'.r^i v-- �._F_rts yr -r�V�.r--•s-�!'.. ,fJ-j v v rn1-'/-v-fir-_v v- -^r-_J-./ti'-.--.-�,�- /_,J_!�.•\, - _ --.1-._N / _/ - _ 1 I z'^, GREEK _ r, _ 5 (� �_,_^ \�_.moi J-_•\/` .^_.-'`./`__'v .'_/`v^�^_.� _�._1_„_J....^-�`_. v..J`_l�./\__ _�_,v.4' :t:__._^_/\��h.-'�/.-_^v'.iti A�\I,/•v'`__•_�J�l�t_�• _�\j / _ _ - I / - ❑ DO u._ -r-r - - --r_ _:`'_ � -,:v„ _ --” ^ - _ ; -':--rv-- -.�•...rte.— -,. 7 /k� / - - __ - S.. '..,ix . ,0 �_�w1 _-: _.r,_�-,--.�,-..-,.1 ,._-.. =J_= tip -` L:.�_ _�` Ls�..:.. ._ �`=•�i..�,_.._-_._ i --NO 11 .1 _ ' 11 ` ' ` /•_._ �`^,�_.�..�vt' __,...�'^�r_/•-Y __vti v ,rte. .. _._ti^ry -'_ ; . , / } /`���" -^ I - - — - __ '-^ <'., I_T -•r^:�^.� ice`-.--.^ .--. .fir-'F-v•/--r-Z�7 v �.-„�' ray.`. �. --s W.', - I _ __- - - - - -- - - - -' -- - - Lv , - �O � INDIAN SNORES ��>`` =^ ���^- - _ - _ }\ - i / -__ __ - '/ - I l ( now or formerly Richard I. Ginsberg & Marvin M. Brown ) i ', CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN _� - - - - r/ At: CUTCHOGUE Town of: SOUTHOLD I I Suffolk County, I / ! _ n t New York BEAWyppp N07a � 7 •\ - - _ by I � � -.- ` ? , t I ,f `1 Suff o Co_ 1-ax Map: 1000 I 116 I 1 3 11 i ' � District Section dock of I-, �1 , -i I Q�) P ��, ,q ' Gj `''S'G1 -I- LOCATION MAP . -) O 6n < I ;o L" SCALE: 1" = 600' - / - v' _.�" I / DATE : JAN- 10,1995 I' 9�M! SCALE : 1"= 100' j gin. O� .� - kAW JOB NO. :92-0747 I_�'; • I SHEET NO- : 1 OF 1 1��� �- --- O APPENDIX Z TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CODES § 100-23 ZONING § 100-30 to have been included for the purposes of clarity and emphasis. [Amended 1-10-1989 by L.L.No. 1-19891 F. Notwithstanding the limitations imposed by any other provisions of this chapter,no building, dredging or filling operation shall be permitted below the datum of mean high water of tidal waters unless such building, dredging or filling operations have been duly authorized and are conducted in conformity with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of all governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof.' ARTICLE III Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) District and Low-Density Residential R-80,R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts [Last amended 1-10-1989 by L.L.No. 1-19891 § 100-30. Purpose. The purpose of the Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) District and the Low-Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts is to reasonably control and, to the extent possible, prevent the unnecessary loss of those currently open lands within the town containing large and contiguous areas of prime agricultural soils which are the basis for a significant portion of the town's economy and those areas with sensitive environmen- tal features, including aquifer recharge areas and bluffs. In addition, these areas provide the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those persons who support the Town of Southold's recreation, resort and second- home economy. The economic, social and aesthetic benefits which can be obtained for all citizens by limiting loss of such areas are well documented and have inspired a host of govern- mental programs designed, with varying degrees of success, to achieve this result. For its part, the town is expending large sums of money to protect existing farm acreage. At the same ' Editor's Note:See also Ch.32,Boats,Docks and Wharves,and Ch.97,Wetlands. 10037 1-25-95 F § 100-30 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 time, the town has an obligation to exercise its authority to reasonably regulate the subdivision and development of this land to further the same purposes while honoring the legitimate interests of farmers and other farmland owners. § 100-31. Use regulations. [Amended 3-14-1989 by L.L.No. 3-19891 In A-C, R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any uses except the following: A. Permitted uses. (1) One-family detached dwellings,not to exceed one (1) dwelling on each lot. (2) [Amended 5-23-1989 by L.L. No. 8-19891 The following agricultural operations and accessory uses thereto, including irrigation, provided that there shall be no storage of manure, fertilizer or other odor- or dust-producing substance or use, except spraying and dusting to protect vegetation, within one hundred fifty(150)feet of any lot line: (a) The raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises, subject to the following special requirements: [1] All buildings for display and retail sales of agricultural and nursery products grown on the premises shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet in floor area or one (1) story in height. Display of produce at a roadside farm stand shall be not less than ten (10) feet from all street and lot lines. Any roadside farm stand in 10038 1-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 excess of fifty (50) square feet in floor area shall be set back twenty (20) feet from the street line. Any stand in existence at the effective date of this chapter must, within one (1) year, comply with all of the provisions hereof. [2] (Reserved)' [3] Off-street parking as required in the Parking Schedule shall be provided and shall be approved by the Planning Board. Any roadside stand in existence on the effective date of this subsection must, within one (1) year from such date, comply with the provisions hereof. (b) The keeping, breeding, raising and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl (except ducks)'on lots of ten(10)acres or more. (c) Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic covered) and other related structures, provided that such buildings shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings. (3) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (4) [Added 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 26-1994] Wineries which meet the following standards: (a) The winery shall be a place or premises on which wine made from primarily Long Island grapes is produced and sold; 2 Editor's Note: Former Subsection A(2)(a)(2), which required signs to comply with §100-31C(9),was repealed 11.29-1994 by L.L.No.25-1994.See now Art.=Signs. 3 Editor's Note:See§100-191A for the Parking Schedule. 4 Editors Note:See also Ch.41,Ducks. 10039 1-25-95 § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 (b) The winery shall be on a parcel on which at least ten (10) acres are devoted to vineyard or other agricultural purposes, and which is owned by the winery owner; (c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from a major road; and (d) The winery shall obtain site plan approval. B. [Amended 12-21-1993 by L.L. No. 27-19931 Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, and, except for two-family dwellings and the uses set forth in Subsection B(14)hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) Two-family dwellings not to exceed one (1) such dwelling on each lot. (2) Places of worship, including parish houses (but excluding a rectory or parsonage, which shall conform to the requirements for a one-family dwelling), subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof shall be erected nearer than fifty(50)feet to any street line and nearer than twenty(20)feet to any lot line. (b) The total area covered by all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent(20%) of the area of the lot. (3) Private elementary or high schools, colleges and other educational institutions, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building shall be less than fifty (50) feet from any street or lot line. 10040 1-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (b) The total area occupied by all principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent(20%)of the area of the lot. (c) Any school shall be a nonprofit organization within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Act and shall be registered effectively thereunder as such. (d) Any such school shall occupy a lot with an area of not less than five (5) acres plus one (1) acre for each twenty-five (25) pupils for which the building is designed. (4) Nursery schools. (5) Philanthropic, eleemosynary or religious institutions, hospitals, nursing and rest homes or sanatoriums for general medical care, but excluding facilities for the treatment of all types of drug addiction, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any parking or loading area shall be located within one hundred (100) feet of any street line nor within fifty(50)feet of any lot line. (b) The total area covered by principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent(20%)of the area of the lot. (c) The maximum height shall be thirty-five (35) feet or two and one-half(21/2)stories. (d) The entire lot, except areas occupied by buildings or parking or loading areas, shall-be-- — suitably landscaped and properly maintained. (e)1 Any nursing home, hospital or sanatorium shall meet the following standards: 1 Editor's Note:Former Subsection BMW, dealing with sufficient exterior lighting, was repealed 12-27-1894 by LJ_ No. 30-1984. This local law also provided for the renumbering of former Subsection B(5)(f)as B(5)(e). 10041 2-25-95 § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 [1) All buildings shall be of fire-resistive construction. [21 All such uses shall be served by adequate water and sewer systems approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health. [3] Patients suffering from communicable diseases shall not be permitted in any nursing home or sanatorium. - (Communicable diseases are defined by the Sanitary Code of the Public Health Council of the State of New York.) [41 Eight thousand (8,000) square feet of lot area shall be provided for each patient bed. (6) Public utility rights-of-way as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote the health, safety, appearance and general welfare of the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed. (7) Beach clubs, tennis clubs, country clubs, golf clubs, public golf courses and annual membership clubs catering exclusively to members and their guests and accessory playgrounds, beaches, swimming Pools, tennis courts, recreational buildings and maintenance buildings, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any parking or loading area shall be located within- one hundred (100) feet of any street line or within fifty(50)feet of any lot line. (b) The total area covered by principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed twenty percent(20%)of the area of the lot. 10042 2-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (c) Such use shall not be conducted for profit as a business enterprise. (d) No such use shall occupy a lot with an area of less than three (3)acres.2 (8) Children's recreation camps organized primarily for seasonal use and subject to the following requirements: (a) No building, tent, activity area or recreation facility shall be less than two hundred(200)feet from any lot line, and any such building, tent, activity area or recreation facility shall be effectively screened therefrom as required by the Planning Board. Buildings intended for use as sleeping quarters shall be not less than thirty (30) feet from each other, except tents, which shall be not less than ten(10)feet apart. (b) The minimum lot area shall be not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet for each cottage, tent or other principal building and not less than three thousand (3,000) square feet of land area shall be provided for each person accommodated in the buildings or tents on the premises. (c)3 The sound level of all outdoor public-address systems shall not exceed the intensity tolerable in a residential neighborhood. (9) Farm labor camps, subject to the following requirements: (a) All farm labor camps on farms shall be construed in conformance with applicable laws 2 Editor's Note:Former Subsection B(7)(e), dealing with the shielding of the direct source of ezterior lighting,was repealed 12-27-1994 by L.L.No.30.1984. 3 Editor's Note: Former Subsection B(8)(c), dealin nearby property, was repealed 12-27.1984 b g with t6e glare of lights toward Provided for the renumbering of former Subsy No. 30-1as 994. (cThis local law also eB( 10043 2-25-9s § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 and shall not be located nearer to any other residence than the residence of the employer, except by specific review and approval of the Planning Board. (10) Veterinarian's offices and animal hospitals, subject to the following requirements: (a) The housing of all animals shall be in a fully enclosed structure, if nearer than one hundred fifty(150)feet to any lot line. (11) Cemeteries. (12) Stables and riding academies. (13)4One (1) accessory apartment in an existing one- family dwelling, subject to the following requirements: (a) The accessory apartment shall be located in the principal building. (b) The owner of the existing dwelling shall occupy one (1) of the dwelling units as the owner's principal residence. The other dwelling unit shall be leased for year-round occupancy, evidenced by a written lease for a term of one (1)or more years. (Cont'd on page 10045) 4 Editor's Note: Former Subsection B(13), wineries, as amended, was repealed 11.29-1884 by L.I.. No.26.1884, which local law also renumbered former Subsections B(14)and(15)as Subsections B(13)and(14),respectively. 10044 2-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (c) The existing one-family dwelling shall contain not less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) square feet of livable floor area. (d) The accessory apartment shall contain not less than four hundred fifty (450) square feet of livable floor area. (e) The accessory apartment shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the livable floor area of the existing dwelling unit. (f) A minimum of three (3) off-street parking spaces shall be provided. (g) Not more than one (1) accessory apartment shall be permitted on a lot. (h) The accessory apartment shall meet the requirements of a dwelling unit as defined in § 100-13 hereof. (i) The exterior entry to the accessory apartment shall, to the maximum extent possible, retain the existing exterior appearance of a one-family dwelling. (j) All exterior alterations to the existing building, except for access to the apartment, shall be made on the existing foundation. (k) The certificate of compliance shall terminate upon the transfer of title by the owner or upon the owner ceasing to occupy one (1) of the dwelling units as the owner's principal residence. In the event of an owner's demise, the occupant of an accessory apartment may continue in occupancy until a new owner shall occupy the balance of the dwelling or one (1) year from date of said demise, whichever shall first occur. [Amended 5-20-1993 by L.L. No. 6-1993] 10040 3-25-95 § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 (1) All conversions shall be subject to the inspection of the Building Inspector and renewal of the certificate of occupancy annually. [Amended 5-20-1993 by L.L.No. 6-19931 (m) The building which is converted to permit an accessory apartment shall be in existence and have a valid certificate of occupancy issued prior to January 1, 1984, or proof of occupancy prior to that date. [Amended 5-20-1993 by L.L.No. 6-19931 (n) The existing building, together with the accessory apartment, shall comply with all other requirements of Chapter 100 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. (o) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 100-31B hereof, no site plan approval by the Planning Board shall be required for the establishment of an accessory apartment. (p) Approval by the Suffolk County Department of s Health Services of the water supply and sewage disposal systems shall be required. (q) No bed-and-breakfast facilities, as authorized by § 100-31B(14) hereof, shall be permitted in or on premises for which an accessory apartment is authorized or exists. [Added 3-14-1989 by L.L.No.3-19891 (14) [Amended 3-14-1989 by L.L.No. 3-1989; 2-7-1995 by L.L.No. 3-19951 Bed-and-breakfasts which have been issued a bed-and-breakfast permit by the Building Inspector. Said permit shall be issued for a term of one (1) year if the following conditions are met: (a) A smoke alarm shall be provided on each floor and in every guest room. 10046 3-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (b) The dwelling shall have at least two (2) exits and there shall be a window large enough for emergency egress in each guest room. (c) The identification sign shall be no larger than two (2) square feet in areas zoned Residential- Office or higher, but there shall be no exterior signage identifying the use as a bed-and- breakfast in residential areas. (d) No accessory apartment, as authorized by § 100-31B(13) hereof, shall be permitted in or on premises for which a bed-and-breakfast facility is authorized or exists. C. Accessory uses, limited to the following uses and subject to the conditions listed in§ 100-33 herein: (1) Any customary structures or uses which are customarily incidental to the principal use, except those prohibited by this chapter. (2) [Amended 4-9-1991 by L.L. No. 10-1991; 7-28-1992 by L.L. No. 141992] Home occupation, including home professional office and home business office. In permitting these uses, the Town Board recognizes that the residents historically have operated small businesses which provide services to the community from their homes. The Board finds that these businesses have not impacted negatively on the appearance of these residential zones. In the Board's judgment, it finds that in order to maintain the economic viability of the town, to maintain the rural quality of life and in the interests of the welfare of the_residents, these businesses (or home occupations) should be permitted to continue. In setting forth the following subsections, the Board intends to permit as of right certain business uses in residential zones with the understanding that these uses are to be conducted in a manner that will not alter the character of the residential neighborhoods. The Board believes that the following subsections 10047 3-25-95 t § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 provide sufficient safeguards to accomplish that aim.These uses shall be permitted, provided that: (a) No display of products shall be visible from the street, and no stock-in-trade shall be kept on the premises. (b) Such occupation is incidental to the residential use of the premises and is carried on in the x main building by the residents therein with not more than one (1) nonresident assistant for whom off-street parking must be provided on site. (c) Such occupation is carried on in an area not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the area of all floors of the main building, and in no event shall such use occupy more than five hundred (500)square feet of floor area. (d) There shall be no exterior effect at the property line, such as noise, traffic, odor, dust, smoke, gas,fumes or radiation. (e) Studios where dancing or music instruction is offered to groups in excess of five (5) pupils at one (1) time or where concerts or recitals are held are prohibited. (fl In no manner shall the appearance of the building be altered, nor shall the occupation be conducted in a manner that would cause the premises to lose its residential character, including but not limited to the use of colors, materials, construction or lighting. (g) Notwithstanding anything set forth elsewhere in this Article, home occupations, home business offices and home professional offices shall in no event be deemed to include animal hospitals, kennels, barbershops, beauty parlors, clinics or hospitals,mortuaries, nursery schools, clubs, auto repair shops, restaurants, tourist 10048 3-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 homes, rooming houses or boardinghouses and uses similar to those listed above. (Cont'd on page 10049) 10048.1 3-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (h)s Home occupations, home business office and home professional offices shall not include manufacturing, fabrication or construction of any type on the site. (i) The outdoor storage of equipment necessary for residents connected with aquaculture shall be screened from view and shall conform to the setbacks for accessory structures. (3) Boat docking facilities for the docking, mooring or accommodation of noncommercial boats, subject to the following requirements: (a) There shall be docking or mooring facilities for no more than two (2) boats other than those owned and used by the owner of the premises for his personal use. (b) The Town Trustees shall approve new boat docking facilities. (c) Boats at such docking facilities shall not be used for overnight sleeping purposes. (4) Garden house, toolhouse, storage building, playhouse, wading pool, swimming pool or tennis court incidental to the residential use of the premises and not operated for gain, subject to the following requirements: (a) Any swimming pool shall be completely enclosed with a permanent chain link (or similar type) fence of not more than two-inch mesh, not less than four (4) feet in height, erected, maintained and provided with a self- _.__�__, F _ closing, self-latching__gate to prexeut_.__._ unauthorized use of the pool and to prevent 6 Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(2)(h), which regulated signs, was repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25.1994. Said L.L. No. 25-1994 also redesignated former Subsections C(2)(i)and 0)as Subsections CM(h)and(i),respectively.For current sign provisions,see Art.IM Signs. 10049 1-25-95 s s § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-31 accidents. However, if said pool is located more than four(4)feet above the ground,then a fence is not required, provided that all points of access to said pool are adequately protected by a self-closing, self-latching gate. Any swimming pool in existence at the effective date of the provisions of this subsection shall, within one (1) year from such date, comply with all of the provisions hereof. (b) Individual outdoor tennis court related to residential use on a lot containing a single- family detached dwelling, provided that the same is set back not less than six (6) feet from all lot lines and that there is no lighting for after dark use. (5) Private garages; provided, however, that not more than two (2) passenger automobile spaces in such garages may be leased to persons not resident on the premises. (6) Off-street parking spaces accessory to uses on the premises. Not more than four (4) off-street parking spaces shall be permitted within the minimum front yard. (7) The storage of either a boat or travel trailer owned and used by the owner or occupant of the premises on which such boat or travel trailer is stored, for his personal use, subject to § 100-191Q, Supplemental parking regulations, and the following require- ments: (a) Such boat or trailer shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in length.— } (b) Such boat or trailer shall be stored only in the required rear yard, and the area occupied thereby, together with the area of all buildings in the rear yard, shall not exceed forty percent (40%)of the area of the required rear yard. 10050 1-25-95 § 100-31 ZONING § 100-31 (c) Such boat or trailer shall not be located within fifteen(15)feet of any street or lot line. (8) Horses and domestic animals other than household pets,provided that such animals shall not be housed within forty (40) feet of any lot line. Housing for flocks of more than twenty-five (25)fowl shall not be constructed within fifty(50)feet of any line. (9)7 Yard sales, attic sales, garage sales, auction sales or similar types of sales of personal property owned by the occupant of the premises and located thereon, subject to the following requirements: (a) Not more than one (1) such sale shall be conducted on any lot in any one (1) calendar year. (b) Adequate supervised parking facilities shall be provided. (c) No signs, except one (1) on-premises sign not larger than six (6) square feet in size displayed for a period of not longer than one (1) week immediately prior to the day of such sale, shall be permitted. (d) A permit shall be obtained therefor from the Town Clerk upon the payment of a fee of fifteen dollars ($15.). [Amended 8-24-1993 by L.L. No. 18-19931 (e) The display permit issued by the Town Clerk shall be posted on the premises so it can be read from the street and removed before sundown on the day of the sale. [Added 8-24-1993 by L.L. No. 1819931, -- - 7 Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(9), as amended, which regulated signs, was repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25-1994, which local law also renumbered former Subsection C(10)as C(9).For current sign provisions,see Art.SYC,Signs. 10051 1-25-95 § 100-31 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-32 (10)Wineries may have an accessory gift shop on the premises which may sell items accessory to wine, such as corkscrews, wineglasses, decanters, items for the storage and display of wine, books on winemaking and the region and nonspecific items bearing the insignia of the winery.Wineries may not have a commercial kitchen as an accessory use but may have a noncommercial kitchen facility for private use by the employees. [Added 11-29-1994 by L.L.No.26-19941 § 100-32. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the Agricultural- Conservation District and in the Low-Density Residential R-80 District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking Schedule8 incorporated into this chapter with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full, as well as to the following bulk and parking requirements: v. A. In the case of a lot held in single and separate ownership prior to November 23, 1971, and thereafter, with an area of less than forty thousand (40,000) square feet, a single-family dwelling may be constructed thereon, provided that the requirements of Column vii of the Bulk Schedule and the Parking Schedule incorporated in this chapter are complied with. B. The bulk and parking requirements for single-family dwellings as set forth in Column ii of the Bulk Schedule and the Parking Schedule incorporated into this chapter shall apply to the following lots: (1) All lots shown on major and minor subdivision maps which were granted final approval by the Planning Board prior to May 20, 1983. 8 Editors Note:The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking Schedule is in$100.191A. 10052 § 100-32 ZONING § 100-32 (2) All lots shown on major subdivision maps upon which the Planning Board has held a hearing for preliminary map approval prior to May 20, 1983. (3) All lots shown on minor subdivision maps that have been granted sketch plan approval by the Planning Board prior to May 20, 1983. (4) All lots set off or created by approval of the Planning Board subsequent to November 23, 1971, and prior to May 20, 1983. C. The bulk and parking requirements for single-family dwellings set forth in Columns i and iii of the Bulk Schedule and Parking Schedule incorporated into this chapter shall apply to the following lots: (1) All lots shown on minor subdivision maps which have been granted sketch plan approval by the Planning Board on or after May 20, 1983. (2) All lots shown on major subdivision maps upon which the Planning Board has held a hearing for preliminary map approval on or after May 20, 1983. (3) All lots set off or created by approval of the Planning Board on or after May 20, 1983. D. The bulk and parking requirements for two-family dwellings set forth in Column xii of the Bulk Schedule and Parking Schedule incorporated into this chapter shall apply to the following lots: (1) All lots shown on minor subdivision maps which have been granted sketch plan approval by the Planning Board on or after May 20, 1983. (2) All lots shown on major subdivision maps upon which the Planning Board has held a hearing for preliminary approval on or after May 20, 1983. (3) All lots set off or created by approval of the Planning Board on or after May 20, 1983. 10053 1-25-95 - § 100-33 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-33 § 100-33. Accessory buildings. [Amended 4-10.1990 by L.L.No.6-19901 In the Agricultural-Conservation District and Low-Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in the required rear yard,subject to the following requirements: A. Such buildings shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet in height. B. Setbacks. [Amended 7-17-1990 by L.L. No. 14.1990; 2-5-1991 by L.L.No.2-1991] (1) On lots containing up to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than three(3)feet from any lot line. (2) On lots containing more than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet up to thirty-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine (39,999) square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than five (5) feet from any lot line. (3) On lots containing in excess of thirty-nine thousand ' nine hundred ninety-nine (39,999) square feet up to seventy-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine (79,999)square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than ten(10)feet from any lot line. (4) On lots containing in excess of seventy-nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine (79,999) square feet, such buildings shall be set back no less than twenty(20)feet from any lot line. C.9 In the case of a waterfront parcel, accessory buildings and structures may be located in the front yard,provided that such buildings--and structures meet the frent-yard- -- setback requirements as set forth by this Code. [Added - 12-22-1992 by L.L.No. 33-19921 9 Editor's Note:Former Subsection C,regarding percentage of occupancy of required yard,was repealed 7.17.1990 by L.L.No.14-1990. 10054 • § 25-1 AGRICULTURAL LANDS § 25-19 Chapter 25 AGRICULTURAL LANDS PRESERVATION — §§ 25-1 through 25-9. (Reserved) • § 25-10. Title. §§ 25-11 through 25-19. (Reserved) § 25-20. Purpose. - §§ 25-21 through 25-29. (Reserved) § 25-30. Definitions. §§ 25-31 through 25-39. (Reserved) § 25-40. Acquisition of development rights. §§ 2541 through 25-49. (Reserved) § 25-50. Alienation of development rights. §§ 25-51 through 25-59. (Reserved) § 25-60. Severability. - [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 3-13-84 as Local Law No. 2-1984. Amendments noted where applicable.] §§ 25-1 through 25-9. (Reserved) ® § 25-10. Title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Agricultural Lands Preservation Law of the Town of Southold." §§ 25-11 through 25-19. (Reserved) 2501 9-25 W •,� 4ir -- - _ `- n '<+-:'+rte t✓wp,,It. � •�� .�L'; § 25-30 • § 25-20 SOUT11OLD&ODF § 25-20. Purpo"e of the Town of Southold finds that the The Town Board rnof ent rights in lands located r the Town it acquisition of develop icultural production will Southold and used in bona fide aST the improvement of prime conserve, protect and encourage roduction of food and the agricultural lands, both for the p the public interest and a gs preservation of open space, and is in proper public purpose of the town in accordance will tore 1 assn et and determinations f the General Municipalork aLaW te Legislature, � forth in § 24? of the §§ 25-21 through 25-29. (Reserved) § 25-30. Definitions. used in this chapter, the terms used herein are defined as As follows: Lands used in bona fide AGRICULTURAL LANDS — • agricultural production. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION —The production for of crops, livestock and livestock commercial purposes ve thereof used for products, but not land or n portionsof such crops, livestock processing or retail merchan ansa Bused in "agricultural or livestock products. equipment storage production" shall also include fences, systems and any buildings, livestock barns, irrigation is other structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes. ALIENATION — The transfer of any development right from the Town of Southold to another. COMMITTEE — The Southold byyn Land l,L No. 13-1991] on_�. [Amended Committee. [ d 6-18 1991— The permanent legal in- DEVELOPMENT RIGHT terest or right to prohibit or restrictf land for any l production- purpose other than agriculturap - STRUCTURE—Anything constructed othing ha in, ing or under the ground or attachheddtOn anything fences. location, on or under the gr y•25-91 `?7�2 Mj • § 25-31 AGRICULTURAL LANDS § 25-50 §§ 25-31 through 25-39. (Reserved) Acquisition o § 25-40. f development rights. Board, the Supervisor A. Upon authorization by the Town shall solicit offers for the sale to the town of development rights in such agricultural lands as may be recommended by the Committee. the Town Board B. Upon the receipt of such offer o offers,o be made of the shall cause an appraisal el appraisalshts being offered• market value of the development rig C. After receipt of such appraisal or appraisals, the Town Board shall hold a public hearing on the question of the acceptance of such offer or offers. the Town Board D. Within sixty (60) days after such hearing, r rejecting such shall adopt a resolution either accepting offer or offers. ® §§ 25.41 through 25-49. (Reserved) § 25-50. alienation of development rights. ment rights acquired by the town pursuant to the A. Develop ter shall not thereafter be alienated, provisions of this chap orit of the Town except upon the affirmative vote of a maJ on the approval Board after a public hearing thereon and up by the electors of the town voting on a proposition sub- ecial or biennial town election. No sub- = - — - — -mitted at a sP roslo of this subsection sequent amendment of the P imposed upon the alienation of shall alter the limitations imp the town prior to any such ® develoment rights acquired by amendment. g The instrument of conveyance transferring the develop- be executed by ment rights to the Town of o f She Town oouthold s f Shallouthold and the the Supervisor on behalf specifically setting grantors and limitations on the alienation of in a covenant the development forth the limlta 9-'Lo.yl 2503 • _ r F., T • y-sys .r-- § 25-50 SOUTHOLD CODE § 25-50 .rights and the limitations on the use and enjoyment of the estate or interest reserved by the grantor as the same are set forth as of the date of the contract for the sale of said development rights. C. Land Preservation Committee.[Amended 6-18-1991 by L.L. No. 13-19911 (1) The Committee shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Town Board. The Chairman of the Committee shall be designated by the Town Board. (2) Duties of the Committee. (a) The Committee shall perform the following duties: [1] To agricultural recommend ands in which the de elopment rights should be acquired by the town. [21 To review all matters relevant to develop- • ment rights and the agricultural economy in general. [3] To serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights have been acquired by the town. [4] To promulgate such rules and regulations as may be deemed necessary to govern the administration, procedures and duties of the Committee,ws And relations shall not become effective until approved by the Town Board. [5] To prepare, amend and maintain appropriate maps delineating agricultural lands, lands in which development rights have been acquired, agricultural lands in which development rights are proposed to be acquired and such other information as may be deemed appropriate. 2504 9-25-91 § 25-50 AGRICULTURAL LANDS § 25-60 [6] To perform such other duties and functions as may, from time to time, be directed by the Town Board. (b) The Committee shall be authorized to incur such expenses in the performance of its duties as shall be appropriated therefor by the Town Board. • §§ 25-51 through 25-59. (Reserved) § 25-60. Severability. Should any provision of this chapter be adjudged invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudication shall not affect — the validity of any other provision of this chapter. F- C- 2505 ti.25.xa � 'r • § 56-1 LANDMARK PRESERVATION § 56-2 Chapter 56 LANDMARK PRESERVATION • § 56-1. Title. § 56-2. Purpose. § 56-3. Definitions. § 564. Landmark Preservation Commission. § 56-5. Duties of Commission. § 56-6. Designation of landmarks. § 56-7. Review of building permit applications. § 56-8. Termination of landmark designation. § 56-9. Severability. • § 56-10. When effective. (HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 1-18-83 as Local Law No. 1-1983. Amendments noted where applicable.) GENERAL REFERENCES Bullding construction—See Ch. 84. Environmental quality review—see Ch. 94. K'atlande—�.fle_C11.87. • § 56-1. Title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Land- mark Preservation Law of Southold Town." § 56-2. Purpose. The Town Board finds there exists in the Town of Southold structures and buildings of historic or architectural significance, 561 4-25-83 , t • § 56-2 SOUTHOLD CODE § 56-3 antiquity, uniqueness of exterior design or construction, which should be conserved, protected and preserved to preserve the architectural character of Southold Town, to contribute to the aesthetic value of the town and to promote the general good, welfare, health and safety of the town and its residents. Therefore, it is the purpose and policy of this chapter to establish a Land- mark Preservation Commission and procedures which it can `follow to assist Southold Town owners of buildings and structures • in oder to conserve, protect and preserve such structures and buildings thereby preserving the unique character of Southhold Town, which will substantially improve property and commercial values in the town and make its hamlets even better places in which to live. § 56-3. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms snall have the meanings indicated: ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE—The quality of a • building or structure based on its date of erection, style and scarcity of same, quality of design, present condition and appearance or other characteristics that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction. COMMISSION — The Landmark Preservation Com- mission established pursuant to this chapter. EXTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES — The architectural style, _ design, general arrangement and _ components of all of the outer surfaces of any building or structure. �IISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE — The quality of a building or structure eased upon its identification with historic persons or events in the'I'own of Southold. LANDMARK — Anv structure or building which has historical or architectural significance. LANDMARK DESIGNATION — The designation of a landmark pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. 5602 4-25-93 • § 56-3 LANDMARK PRESERVATION § 56-5 STRUCTURE — Any assembly of materials forming a constriction framed of component structural parts for occupancy or use, including buildings. § 56-4. Landmark Preservation Commission. [Amended 11-26- 1991 by L.L. No. 28-1991] • A. There is hereby created a Landmark Preservation Commis- sion, which shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by the Town Board, to serve without compensation. B. The term of office of each member appointed to said Commission shall be two (2)years; provided, however, that of those members first appointed three(3)shall be appointed for one(1)year and four(4)shall be appointed for two(2)years. If a vacancy occurs other than by expiration of a term, it shall be filled by the Town Board by appointment for the unexpired term. • § 56-5. Duties of Commission. The Commission shall perform the following duties and func- tions: A. Encourage the preservation of landmarks through educational activities. B. Recommend buildings and structures to the Town Board for landmark designation in accordance with the provisions of § 56-6 hereof. C. Review and, where appropriate, give advisory recom- mendations with respect to all applications for building ® permits involving alterations of the exterior of designated landmarks in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 56-7 hereof. D. Cooperate with civic and professional organizations in- terested in landmark preservation. 1- 5603 1 -25-92 � {, § 56-5 SOUTHOLD CODE § 56-6 E. Offer advice and suggestions to or at the request of owners or the Town Board to implement the purposes of this chapter. F. Promote and encourage historic awareness and judicious concern for designated landmarks. § 56-6. Designation of landmarks. • A. Selection of buildings and structures for landmark designation shall be determined on the basis of historical and/or architectural significance. B. In considering buildings and structures for possible land- mark designation, the Commission shall comply with the following procedure: (1) Prior to recommending to the Town Board that a building or structure be designated as a landmark, the Commission shall give written notice to the owner of the property, as shown on the last completed town assessment roll, that the Commission is considering • recommending to the Town Board that the building or structure be designated as a designated landmark. Such notice shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. Such notice shall request that the owner consent to such designation by signing and (Cont'd on page 5605) 5604 t -25-92 4• .m - 44 �• - _ • § 56-6 LANDMARK PRESERVATION § 56.6 returning the form of consent enclosed with the notice. Such notice shall also indicate that if the owner ob- jects to such designation or desires further in- formation, the owner may return the form enclosed with the notice, which requests that the owner and/or representative seeks a meeting with the Commission • within thirty(30) days from the receipt of such request by the Commissioner. (2) The Commission may not proceed to make its recommendation unless one (1) of the following conditions are met: (a) The owner consents in writing to such designa- tion. (b) The owner, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice specified in § 56-6 (B(1), has failed to notify the Commission of his objection to such designation or failed to request a meeting with the Commissioner. • (c) A member of the Commission has personally met with all of the owners of the property being considered for designation and has fully explained all aspects of designation and the consequences that will result from such designation. (3) When the Town Board receives a recommendation from the Commission that a building or structure be designated as a landmark, the Town Clerk shall give written notice thereof to the owner of the property, _ stating the-time and place when the.Tawn Board-will meet to consider the question of the landmark • designation of such building or structure. Such notice shall also state that the owner shall be given an op- portunity to be heard at such meeting. C. The designatior- of property as a designated landmark by the Town Board, pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, shall not impose any obligation or responsibility upon the owners thereof, nor shall such designation in any ® 5605 4-25-93 • § 56-6 SOUTHOLD CODE § 56-7 manner restrict or limit the use, development, repair, maintenance, alteration or modification of the property by the owners thereof. D. The designation of property as a designated landmark by the Town Board. pursuant :o the provisions of this chapter, shall not become effective until such property is entered in the register of Designated Landmarks and filed • with the " own Clerk. § 66-7. review of building permit applications. A. Every application for a building permit for the recon- struction or alteration of or addition to a designated landmark shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Commission for its comments and recommendations. No building permit shall be issued until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations with the Building Inspector a^a has mailed a copy thereof to the applicant or until the -)assage of tourteen (1�.) days from • the date of referral, nichever shall first occur. B. The application for a building permit shall not be deemed complete until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations or until the passage of fourteen (14) days from rhe date of referral of the building permit application to the Commission, whichever shall first occur. C. In reviewing an application for a building permit referred t_o it, the Commission shall consider the effect that the contemplated work will have on the exterior architectural features of the designated landmark. If the Commission recommends modification in the contemplated work in order to preserve the architectural features of the struc- ture, it shall suggest such modifications as will minimize the costs, time and inconvenience to the owner. D. In reviewing an application for a building permit, the Commission shall consider only the exterior architectural features of the huddinz lir structure. F .5606 4-25.83 :1 ♦. .«fit•c.. .2n a-..... :. A'.},. -�--� .''��� n moi- ,. � • § 56-7 LANDMARK PRESERVATION § 56-30 E. The comments and recommendations of the Commission with respect to building permit applications referred to it pursuant to this section shall be deemed advisory only. The owner's rejection of or refusal to comply with such com- ments and recommendations shall not delay or in any way �. impede the otherwise favorable action on the issuance of a • building permit. F. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to prevent the ordinary and necessary maintenance and repair of any exterior architectural features of a designated landmark which does not involve a significant change in design, material or outward appearance thereof. § 56-8. Termination of landmark designation. Whenever a designated landmark is destroyed or its exterior is altered to such an extent that it ceases to have architectural significance, the Town Board may, by resolution, direct that it be • removed from the Register of Designated Landmarks. Prior to taking such action, however, the owner shall be given written notice of such proposed action and shall be given an opportunity to appear before the Town Board and be heard thereon. § 56-9. Severability. Each of the foregoing provisions of this chapter has been adopted in an endeavor to preserve and extend the public welfare by preserving the characteristics of historic and/or architecturally significant structures or districts. In the event that any portion of this chapter shall be determined"invalid;sue -cte-tiffiiriation shall not affect or result in the invalidity of any other provision con- tained in this chapter. § 56-10. When effective. This chapter shall take effect immediately. 5607 4-25-83 e771 :"' .. qtr E- • OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION Chapter 59 OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION §§ 59-1 through 59-9. (Reserved) • § 59-10. Title. §§ 59-11 through 59-19. (Reserved) § 59-20. Findings. §§ 59-21 through 59-29. (Reserved) § 59-30. Definitions. §§ 59-31 through 59-39. (Reserved) § 59-40. Acquisition. §§ 59-41 through 59-49. (Reserved) § 59-50. Alienation of fee, interest or right; instrument of • conveyance; Open Space Committee. §§ 59-51 through 59-59. (Reserved) § 59-60. Severability. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 3-22-88 as Local Law No. 2-1988. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENF.RAI.REFERENCES Agricultural lank preservation—See Ch.25. Environmental quality review—See Ch.44. Landmark pre ervation—tiee Ch.56. Parka and recreation arews—See Ch.62. 1Vetla uk— Ser Ch.97 Zoning—See Ch. 100. Suhdivi.imi J land—See Ch. A106. 5901 9-25-91 �k 4:. F § 59-1 i SOUTHOLD CODE §§ 59-1 through 59.9 § 59-30 (Reserved) § 59-I0. Title. This chapter shall be known and or Open Area Preservation Law of themay Town sof as the "Open Space Southold." §§ 59-11 through 59-19• (Reserved) § 59-20• Mndings, The Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that Of open space or open area in lands lova if Preserved the acquisition p ed and maintained in their ted In the Town of public interest and a Proper Of o Southold, the findings and determi anon Purpose New a Pen state, is In the set forth in town 'n accordance with § 247 of the General fork State Legislature, as Municipal Lav, §§ 59-21 through 59-29. (Reserved) § 59-30. Definitions. •' As used in this chapter, the terms used herein are defined as ACQUISITION — To accept, b bequest,devise, lease or otherwise y purchase, gift, or right in real the fee or an J grant, - _ development Property, includin y lesser Pment rights, g but not limited to ALIENATION — The transfer -of- er'�st in real property from the Town the fee or an Of Southold to anotherr. COMMITTEE — The Committee. A Southold Town Land Preservation mended 6-18-1991 b Y L•I'• NO. 14-1991] DEVELOPMENT or right RIGHT — The permanent le interest Prohibit or restrict the use of land for other than open space or open area. ny purpose .D902 9-25-91 `_ • § 59-30 OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION § 59-50 OPE-N SPACE or OPEN AREA — Any space or area characterized by natural scenic beauty or whose existing openness, natural condition or present state of use, if retained. would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resources. STRL CTURE — Anything constructed or erected in, on or • under the ground or attached to anything having a location on or under the ground, including fences. §§ 59-31 through 59-39. (Reserved) § 59-40. Acquisition. A. Upon authorization by the Town Board, the Supervisor shall solicit offers for the sale to the town of the fee or any lesser interest or right in real property as may be recommended by the Committee. B. Upon the receipt of such offer or offers, the Town Board shall cause an appraisal or appraisals to be made of the market value of the fee or any lesser interest or right in such real property being offered. C. After receipt of such appraisal or appraisals, the Town Board shall hold a public hearing on the question of the acceptance of such offer or offers. D. Within sixty (60) days after such hearing, the Town Board shall adopt a resolution either accepting or rejecting such offer -- - - -- or offers. — - - • §§ 59-41 through 59-49. (Reserved) § 59-50. Alienation of fee, interest or right; instrument of conveyance; Open Space Committee. A. The fee or am- lesser interest or right acquired by the town �_> pursuant to the trrovisions of this chapter shall not thereafter _ r 5903 9-25-91 `i SOUTHOLD CODE § 59-50 be alienated except upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Town Board after a public hearing thereon and upon the approval by the electors of the town voting on a proposition Submitted at a special or biennial town election. No subse- quent amendment of the provisions of the subsection shall alter the limitation imposed upon the alienation of the fee or any lesser interest or right acquired by the town prior to any such amendment. B. The instrument of conveyance transferring the fee or any :esser interest or right in real property to the Town of Southold shall be executed by the Supervisor on behalf of the Town of Southold and the grantors and shall contain a covenant specifically setting forth the limitations on the lienation of the fee or any lesser interest or right and the limitations on the use and enjoyment of the estate or interest reserved by the use and enjoyment of the estate or interest reserved by the grantor as the same are set forth as of the date of the contract for sale of said fee or any lesser interest or right. C- Land Preservation Committee.[Amended 6-18-1991 by LL No. 14-19911 • (1 1 The Committee shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Town Board. The Chairman of the Committee shall be designated by the Town Board. (2) Duties of the Committee. (a) The Committee shall perform the following duties: [1] To recommend to the Town Board lands in which the fee or any lesser interest or rights should be acquired by the town.------ —-- -- [2] To review all matters relevant to open space or open areas. [3] To serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on the lands in which the fee or any lesser interest or rights have been acquired by the town. 9-'?5.91 ` �•�,_- 4 r - ',i', - `•.vim�?1 1' § 59-50 OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION § 59-60 [4] To promulgate such rules and regulations as may be deemed necessary to govern the admin- istration, procedures and duties of the Commit- tee, which rules and regulations shall not become effective until approved by the Town Board. • [5] To prepare, amend and maintain appropriate maps delineating open space or open area lands, lands in which the fee or anv lesser interests or rights have been acquired, lands in which the fee or any lesser interest or rights are proposed to be acquired and such other information as may be deemed appropriate_ [6] To perform such other duties and functions as may, from time to time, be directed by the Town Board. (b) The Committee shall be authorized to incur such expenses in the performance of its duties shall be • appropriated therefor by the Town Board. §§ 59-51 through 59-59. (Reserved) § 59-60. Severability. Should any provisions of this chapter be adjudged invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of any other provisions of this chapter. 5905 5-25-88 {E � 111 .a fir. '77-7-777", APPENDIX 3 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MONITORING WELL DATA RESULTS SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS e : North Fork Country Club ESS: Main Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 LE DATE: MAR- 2-1993 SAMPLE TAP: BATH USEPA Result NYS MCL Result MCL total coliform .. . absent absent alpha-BHC . . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb specific Gond. . . . . 327 - umhos/cm beta-BHC . . . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.8 - gamma-BHC . . . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb nitrate . . 5.6 10.0 ppm delta-BHC _ . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb free ammonia . . . . . <0.02 - ppm lindane(sum BHC) - 0.2 ppb chloride . .. 21 250. ppm heptachlor <0.20 0.4 ppb sulfate . . . . . . . .. . 87 250. ppm heptachl"epoxide <0.20 0.2 ppb iron <0.10 0.3 ppm * aldrin . . . . . . . . . <0.20 - manganese . . . . . .. . 0.05 0.3 ppm * dieldrin . . . . . . . <0.20 - copper . . . . . 2.62 1.3 ppm 4,4 DDE . . . . . . . . <0.20 - • • sodium 13.6 - ppm + 4, 4 DDD . . . . . . . . <0.20 - zinc . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 5.0 ppm 4,4 DDT . . . . . . . . <0.20 - cadmium . . . . . . . ... <2.0 10. ppb endrin . . . . . . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb lead . . . . . . . . . . ... <1.0 50. ppb endrin aldehyde <0.20 - chlordane . . . . . . <1.00 2. ppb aldicarb . .. . . ... . <1 - ppb alachlor . . . . . . . <0.50 2. ppb aldicarb sulfoxide <1 - ppb methoxychlor . . . <0.50 40. ppb aldicarb sulfone <1 - ppb endosulfan I . . . <0.20 - TOTAL ALDICARB .. <1 7. ppb endosulfan II . . <0.20 - carbofuran . . . .... <1 15. ppb 3-hydroxycarbfuran <1 - ppb oxamyl ... .. . . . .. . <1 50. ppb carbaryl . . . . . . .. . <l 50. ppb 1-napthol .. . . . . . . <1 - ppb methomyl . . . . . .... <1 50. ppb propoxur . . . . . . .. . <1 50. ppb methiocarb . . . .. . . <1 50. ppb ppm a parts per million ppb - parts per billion * Iron and manganese combined should not exceed 0.5 ppm + Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 ppm Severely resticted sodium diet should not exceed 20 ppm Result Result vinyl chloride . .. . . . . . . <0.5 (2) benzene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 methylene chloride .. . . . <0.5 toluene . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1,1 dichloroethane . . . . . <0.5 chlorobenzene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 i trans 1,2 dichloroethene <0.5 ethylbenzene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 chloroform .. . .. .. . . . . . . <0.5 (100) o-xylene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1,2 dichloroethane . . . . . <0.5 m-xylene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 _ 1,1,1 trichloroethane . . <0.5 p-xylene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 carbon tetrachloride . . . <0.5 total xylene . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 1 bromo 2 chloroethane . <0.5 2 chlorotoluene (o) .. . . .. . . . <0.5 1,2 dichloropropane . . . . <0.5 3 chlorotoluene (m) . . . . . . . . . <0.5 trichloroethene .. .. . . . . <0.5 4 chlorotoluene (p) . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 chlorodibromomethane . . . <0.5 (100) total chlorotoluene . . . . .. . . . 0.0 1,2 dibromoethane . . . . . . <0.02 (0.05) 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene . . . . . . <0.5 2 bromo 1 chloropropane <0.5 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene . . . . . . <0.5 bromoform .. . . . . .. . . . . . . <0.5 (100) m,p-dichlorobenzene . . . . . . . . . <0.5 tetrachloroethene . . . . . . <0.5 1,2 dichlorobenzene (o) . . . . . <0.5 cis dichloroethene <0.5 p-die*_hylbenzene . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 freon 113 . . . . ... . . . . . . . <0.5 1,2,4,5 tetramethylbenzene . . <0.5 dibromomethane . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1,2,4 trichlorobenzene . . . . . . <0.5 1,1 dichloroethene . . . . . <0.5 1,2,3 trichlorobenzene . . . . . . <0.5 bromodichloromethane . . . <0.5 (100) ethenylbenzene (styrene) . _ . . <0.5 2,3 dichloropropene . . . . <0.5 1 methylethylbenzene (cumene) <0.5 cis dichloropropene . . . _ <0.5 n-propylbenzene . . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 trans dichloropropene . . <0.5 tort-buttlbenzene <0.5 1, 1, 2 trichloroethane <0.5 c­c-h>>t`•lbenzene . . . _ _ . -0.1 1, 1, 1, 2 tetrachlo _thane <0.5 ;,pr rltoluen� ic. - '1ten�1 s-tetrachloroethane . . . . <0.5 n-but -ltenzere " 1, 2, 3 trichloroprcpane <0.5 i __ac'ilorobu-a_Bene n 2, 2 dichloropropane _ . . <0.5 _ vbr_mo chloropropane 0 ' 1, 3 dichloropropane . . . . <0.5 methyl-tertiary-tutyl-ether <0.5 (` � ) NOTE: < symbol means "less than" indicating no detection M3vimum Contaminant Levels (MCL s) for volatile organic and hydrocarbon compounds are 5 parts per billion (ppb) each. Limits established for individual compounds are noted in parentheses() . SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS Y NAME: North Fork Country Club ADDRESS: Mair. Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 SAMPLE DATE: SEP-15-1992 SAMPLE TAP: BATH USEPA Result NYS MCL Result MCL total coliform . . . absent absent alpha-BHC <0.20 0.2 ppb specific cond. . . . . 323 - umhos/cm beta-BHC <0.20 0.2 ppb pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.6 gamma-BHC . . . . . . <0.20 0.2 b nitrate Pp free ammonia „ � 6.4 10.0 ppm delta-BHC . . . . <0.20 0.2 ppb <0.02 - Ppm lindane(sum BHC) 0.2 ppb chloride . . . . . . . . . 2C 250. ppm heptachlor <0.20 0.4 ppb sulfate 78 250. ppm heptachl"epoxide <0.20 0.2b iron 0.16 0.3 ppm * aldrin <0.20 . • - pp manganese . . . . . . . . <0.05 0.3 ppm * dieldrin <0.20 copper . . . . . . . . . . . 0.27 1.0 ppm 4,4 DDE . . . . . . . . <0.20 sodium . . . . . . . . . . . 15.3 - ppm + 4,4 DDD . . .. . . . . <0.20 zinc . . . . . . . . . . . <0.4 5.0 ppm 4,4 DDT . . . . . . . . <0.20 cadmium . . . . . . . . . . <2.0 10. ppb endrin <0.20 0.2 ppb lead . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 5C. ppb endrin aldehyde <0.20 - chlordane . . . . . . <1.00 2. ppb aldicarb . . . . . . . . . <1 - ppb alachlor <0.50 2. ppb aldicarb sulfoxide <1 - ppb methoxychlor . . . <0.50 40. ppb aldicarb sulfone <1 - ppb endosulfan I . . . <0.20 TOTAL ALDICARB • . <1 7. ppb endosulfan II . . <0.20 carbofuran . . . . <1 15. ppb 3-hvdroxvcarbfuran <1 - ppb oxamyl . . . . . . . . . . . <1 50. ppb carbaryl . . . . . . . . . <1 50. ppb 1-napthol . . . . . . . . <1 - ppb methomyl . . . . . . . . . <1 50. ppb propoxur . . . . . . . . . <1 50. ppb methiocarb . . . . . . . <1 50. ppb PPM a parts per million ppb - parts per billion * Iron and manganese combined should not exceed 0.5 ppm . + Moderately restricted sodium diet should not exceed 270 ppm Severely resticted sodium diet should not exceed 20 ppm . • Result Result vinyl chloride <0.5 (2) benzene <0.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . methylene chloride <0.5 toluene . . <0.5 ,1 dichloroethane <0.5 chlorobenzene <0.5 trans 1,2 dichloroethene <0.5 ethylbenzene <0.5 chloroform . . . . . . <0.5 (100) o-xylene <0.5 1,2 dichloroethane . . . <0.5 m-xylene <0.5 1,1,1 trichloroethane . . <0.5 p-xylene <0.5 carbon tetrachloride . . . <0.5 . . . . total xylene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 1 bromo 2 chloroethane . <0.5 2 chlorotoluene (o) . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1,2 dichloropropane . . . . <0.5 3 chlorotoluene (m) <0.5 trichloroethene <0.5 4 chlorotoluene (p) . , , , , , , , . , <0.5 chlorodibromomethane . . . <0.5 (100) total chlorotoluene . . . . . . . . 1,2 dibromoethane 0.0 <0.02 (0.05) 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene . . . . . . <0.5 2 bromo 1 chloropropane <0.5 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene . . . . . . <0.5 bromnfc-rm . . . . • • • - • - • • • • <0.5 (10G) m,p-dichlorobenzene . . . . . . . . . <0.5 tetrachloroethene <0.5 1,2 dichlorobenzene . . . . cis dichloroethene (o) <0.5 <0.5 p-diethylbenzene <0.5 freon 113 1,2,4,5 tetramethylbenzene . . <0.5 dibromomethane . . . . . . <0.5 1,2,4 trichlorobenzene . . . . . <0.5 1,1 dichloroethene <0.5 1,2,3 trichlorobenzene <0.5 bromodichloromethane <0.5 (100) ethenylbenzene (styrene) . . . . <0.5 2,3 dichloropropene <0.5 1 methylethylbenzene (cumene) <0.5 cis dichloropropene <0.5 n-propylbenzene trans dichloropropene . . <0.5 tert-butylbenzene . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1,1,2 trichloroethane . . <0.5 sec-butylbenzene . . . . . . . . . . . . <0.5 1, 1,1,2 tetrachlo ethane <0.5 isopropyltoluene (p-cymene) . <0.5 s-tetrachloroethane . . . . <0.5 n-butylbenzene <0.5 1,2,3 trichlorcpropane . <0.5 hexachlorobutadiene <0.5 2,2 dichloropropane . . . . <0.5 1,2 dibromo 3-chloropropane <0.02 1,3 dichloropropane . . . . <0.5 methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether <0.5 (50) NOTE: < symbol :Weans "less than" indicating no detection Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL s) for volatile organic and hydrocarbon compounds are 5 parts per billion (ppb) each. Limits established for individual compounds are noted in parentheses() . APPENDIX 4 NYSDEC WATER QUALITY REPORT ON DOWNS CREEK � � ^ � � 33 S_ 53334 34 GRO WATER MONITORING WELL HEADER is WELL NUMBER: 53034 LATITUDE : 405959 LONGITUDE : 723039 HAGSTROM MAP : 23-30,J u TOWNSHIP: SOUTHOLD VA A,, COMMUNITY: EAST MATTITUCK LOCATION BETA ILSZ Q0 I4AH-0 LANE, 387 FKA/0' IT-25 39 41 ELEVATION OF LS : 0 . 00 APPROXIMATE DTW : 27 WELL DEPTH : 52 .58 * AQUIFER : UPPER GLACIAL LITHOLOGY : COARSE 10 FINE TAN 9 HYDROGEOLOGIC ZN 4 m SCREEN MATERIAL: STEE4� SCREENED INTERVAL : 40,58-50 .58 WELL NO DATE DTW ELEV OF H201 WELL NO DATE DTW ELEV OF H20 u 53 , 334 12/ 9/74 27 . 16 3 . 21 53y334 12/27/93 2G. 47 3 . 90 so MINIMUM DEPTH TO WATER MTx!vK1EV�l_H_�_A_T_ER--- WELL NO DATE DTW ELEV OF H201 WELL NO DATE DTW ELEV OF H20 `~ MORE? . �$ K-Fryw 18711 53334 12/27/1993 26 . 47 3 . 90 �~ l8712 53334 9/13/1993 26 . 75 J . 6� 1071i b3334 6/23/1093 K . 6 � 4 . 7,.) IB714 53334 3/25/1993 25 . 48 18715 53334 12/23/1992 26. 24 4 . 13 187IG 53334 9/15/1992 2606 3 . 71. 12717 53334 G/15/1992 2G . 63 0 . 72 18718 53334 3/25/199i 2b . G7 3 . 70 � - _- / r 3 l ,3721 53334 6/24/1991 2G . 09 4 . 28 - 1872G 53334 12/ 1/1989 24 .G2 5 . 75 IS72Y 53334 3/201989 26 .81 * 1873G 53334 6/17/1987 25 .49 4 .80 * IB737 53334 3/ 9/1987 25 . 50 4 . 87 * 18739 53334 9/21/198b 2" . 22 3 . 15 * 18740 53334 G/17/19BG 2b . 79 2 . 51) IB742 53334 12/12/1985 27. 03 3.34 18743 53334 9/ 6/1985 27 . 01 3 .36 19745 53334 12/24/1984 25 . 96 4 . 41 1374u 433ji 9/11/1984 25 . 44 4 . 87 18748 53334 12/27/1903 - - -' ' - - - - / -- - ---- - -' ---- --' - -- - - -- - ' O -�-��--� ����,�--------- --- '-- -' -' --- - - 2 4 .65 18919 53334 9/19/1983 5 3 . 82 G/ 11/1 --bit�� -----'- --- - -- --- -- ' -- ----- -- 8r5l 53334 3/13/ 1985 25 . 73 4 . 64 8752 53334 12/35 /33P2 26 . 97 3 . 4; M URE;> SUFFOLK C•OUNT`i' DEPT . OF HEALTH EER ICEs - TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . . PAGE 3 s 1 WELL NO . : 53,334 1G FT. W/0 ELI3AH'S LANE , 387 FT. NIO RT .25 2 1 3 SAMPLE DATE: 11/ 9/1992 4 5 A NEGATIVE SIGNS — HOLD B INTERPRETED AS A LESS THANy!. 7 AN SIGN 6 ' - ----------------------ALL VALUE:3 ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION Pr:;------'-- ------------ a 6 .rn --MOD lGHLGROMETHANE 600 � - r9 - - - - - - - - -496 2,3 DICHLOROT'ROUNE 0.50 - 601 1 METHYLETHYLBENZ (CUMENE; -0. 50 :"= - 10 4437 CIS DICHLOROFRMNE llol .10-50, 602 N-PROPYLBENZENE -0.50 _ 12 400 TRANS c ,. r *• c 13 l0 322 1 , 1 ,2 TRICHLOROETHANE -0.50 G04 SEG-UTY i BE" 7E,?E -0 .50 14 - 11 1s 16 12 409 2 Tr �_ nC^ a1n -.cr -= n "?.'-7 = _ - - 17 2.9!5 -S-TETRACHLOROETi ANE :70.50 . 600 NAUTYLBENZENE -0.50 _ _. 11 1/ - _ - - - 1s ATI ,2 ,3 TR ICHLORORROPANE 70:50 "607 HEXACHLOROBUTAD IENE -0.-50 20 n n G 1• +r c ti , O, -u 1 - -- - 0 .00 21 16 .tet 17 452 2 CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER x•. 00 22 u 24 1ar ,- __ 2s 26 19 Q 20 27 WNW = - 28 21 r ;_ 29 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF rErL±rSERVICES - 30 = 23 .1 31 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OFF WATER . . . . . PAGE 32 24 2s WELL NO. : 53,33135 I G fl . W/0 EL IJAH'S LANE 387 FT . N/O RT . 25 =-_ _- =}._ 34 n SAMPLE DATE: - 2/17/1980 36 1 n OF G T THE BWAS NOT ANALYZED j - - 37 n m r I n +� 1 1 r r r .1+ r r� LESS NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN n 39 --------------------- -- ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION PPS------- ---------- 40 41 30 31 2� BENZENE -3.00 -= J IN PER r: i-- 4- 3;`i 2 BROMOID !CPLORCIMETHANE -3. 00 0 ETh E N E N Z E N C3 T Y R E N E 406 2 . 3 DICHLOROPROPENm E 0. 00 '01 1 , 0 . 00 Zllrl Y E T H Y T L.B ENZ. C U M E N 6 407 CIS DICHLOROPROPENE 0. 00 GO' N-PROPYLBENZENE 1). 00 lGHLOROPROPENE Q - 6 Ga T-E- , - -------0a-..-0 0 322 1 , 1 ,2 TRICHLOROETHANE �w TIDENZ & p 00 --- -5-00 60SEC-BUTYEIqE . 4 - y2 TETRAGHLORDETHANE; 0. 00 605 !S9pRqF,*L R N B p S 295 S-TETRACHLOROETHANE -3.00 606 N-EU TYLBENZENE- 0. 00 s 6 433 1 ,2,3 TRICHLOROPROPANE 0 . 00 607 HEXACHY 4-3 LOROBUTAD IENE 7 ---RQPRQfIAN, I - - 0 Cl 452 2 6 CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER - 00 T Q W L 0 R 0 Do YOU WANT 10 12 13 14 is 14 COUNjt� HEALTH SERVICES AAGAN 1 17 WATER WATER. . . . .PAGE TR c SIT 16 WELL NO. : S 53, 334 16 FT . W/O ELIJAH*S LANE, 3'87 FT. NIO RT. 25 -1 AMPLE DATE: ll/ 9/199 21 SAMPLE VALUE G F 22 A— ?f D I GN Si-dL T' 24 TO 61 21 "'4:-�fVALUES �PER-`-BILL'10k PPB---- 'AL --- f R SIGN -7- LESS THAN :Zr 27 E 30G VINYL CHLORIDE -0.50 250 BENZENE 305 METHYLENE CHLORIDE -0.50 251 ' TOLUENE -0. =0 29 IN 111 1 ; 1 I I j x 4 . 00 2,5413 31 IR-ANS -I)ICHj-10­­- O -tr STE 32 ETHYL BENZENE W! f-N -0.50 33 49- R�M � L Orb 0 YLENEf -0 324 1 , 2 DICHLOROETHANE -0. n 5 0 252 M-XYLENE U 321 1 , 1 , 1 TRICHLOROETHANE 3. 00 2 5 3 P-XYLENE 31 -N 3 51, -0.50 H j, ,�r NEG 39 -0 32 4- .- -2- c L. 40 0-7:CHLOROTOLUENE -ICHLOR-0-P 13 2 D :-,-0.50 41 34 -24 ---- ��CHLOROTOLUENE 42 -0. --0.50 MORE? 36 Is 46 41 R 7-7 m 41 40 so HEALTH �0- YA 43 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . . P A L� 52 43 LAB NO. 1192039 S3 41 AM-. L ........ S4 ss S6 45 sy 41 0 sit S9 ES ARE IN PARTS PER BILL ION 60 41 !��!j� LENE0 15 0 26 8 P-CHLO61 ROTOLUENE 0 62 41 0 0 G It!16, 1 63 so 2. DIBROMOETHlihi-g- �1�g -0.501-1 -19 : 4 =0 sl 1- 3 5 T'RIMETHYLRENZENE--- -0. -BROMO LdibfR -zg, 65 CH OFANE -0.50 418 1 ,2-,4 TRIMETHYLBENZEN - �0 52 -0. 66 Q 67 68 ,4 311 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE -0. 50 412 O-DICHLOROBEN-2,-ENE (A 4:t ST A FREON = - -- "- F -0.50 � 435- 1 , 1 ,4, n 71 292 DIBROMOmE HANE- - -0.50 437 1 ,2?1 TRICHLORODENZENE--- -0. 50 4 RgE 57 7 7S -2 16 53 3 SI CiROUNII WATER MONITOhING WE.LL 54 SS A T I T U D E -41001'7 L O.N1 G I T U D f-] 7;;:3.1':.;:.' 1--1 A G S T R 11 Vi f)P TOWNSH IF SOUTHOLD COMM Y MATT ITUCK sb ATION DETAILS : S/S OF' TUTH ILL LANE, 196 FT . WIO WICKMAN AVE. ANI) C-,W T'i"T -f-0 N T 7f, ,; EL A N G IN 1.':L 1:V(.I T J)N OF N P '::LEVAT '[()N ())" LS : 0. 00 APPROXIMATE DTW : 1.G W E L L DE 1,T H . 41. „ 4;:? A(.-i U T T`T-:R :: UT'T'ER G L A C I A L LITHOL,C)GY : COARISE T1.] FI*NE "CAN S 1--ryn , R,U J.":0 L 0 G 1.C 2.:N u W N f"R C,DA.f., S C,R E N M o T E R 1'.A 1. S T E E L SCIREENEI) INTERVAL : 29. 4 2 `-) . 4:2 UIRS T MEASURMENT TAH EN MOS'f RECENT MEASURMENT WELL NO D A T E DTW ELEV OF 1-1201 WELL NO DATE J)T W ELEV 0 F H 2 C.) J 3) 3f 4/7'.i 1.C-) . 0 G 3 . 55 ),3 ' 336 _I .1.2/2 8/9-3 1.C) . 27 ;3 . �4 ------------------------------- -------------------------- 2 MIN WAUR MAXIMUM DEPTH ------- 3 WELL NO DATE JITW ELEV OF H301 WELL NO DAT8 DTW ELEV OF F120 4 3:131,:m 3/ 7/79 13. 79 5 . 82 3'33G 1. 1 Gi t3 J. 17. 48 2 . *13 M 0 R E7 $77T, 0 W E L L. N U M 1-3 E R DATE D T 1-1 T 0 WATER ELEV--OF W(,-i 11 I G 8 C.)0 :`.1:3:3;3(1 1 ?f28/1t,933 1G .2)-7 :1 11 34 Ia 8 G G 113 11";3113 3 ti 3/25/3.993 15 .24 4 . 37 18 8 G 4 :53336 12/16/1992 16 . 01 16 r 17 '01 G C)G 5 ,:3:3G G/ 9/1992 16 . 40 12, 5333,3C) 3:',:10/1`•,11` 1. r5 1. 3 . 10 19 8 G 8 5333E 12/12/1991 1G.52 3.09 20 13869 '53336 9/1-6/199.1 16.42 3. 1.9 21 1.8870 53336 6/25/1991 1G. 11 3 .50 5;333:3G) 1.)/25/19 91 15 . 65 113 . 96 1(1.3 1)7 53;33(3 12/:1; /19: 1)0 .16 . 20 ;3 . 41. .1 .1 �*:l 1'..1 9!:1 :1!1.9`:)0 1 `5 4 4 ., 07 71 25 % 53'3 3 6 G/ 6/1990 15. 18 4 . 43 26 .1.8875 53336 3/12/1990 ,, 15.2626 4 . 35 27 18876 5333G 12/ 1/1989 14 .GO 5.01 .1.8877 53 3 3 G 8 9 14 . 09 5 . 52 29 1 B 8 7 81 :5;313;3G G I G/19 9 I'd, 1.115 . 00 4 30 k: S f3 7 9 53336 2/2 3/1')'. (:1 16 . GG 2 9'.') 31 G a a 0 5333G ---- 7/1988 1G .63 2 91:3 32 .1.8883. 5333G 9/27/1988 17 .01 2 . 60 17 0---M -R E'; 34 -13,2 513 3 G G/14 :I.9 G 81 1 G) 1 0 "JJ. 31 B(':i G4 2 1.0 1.987 16 GS ---`r' . 9:)'-- 38 .18885 5333G 19/ '3/1987 16. 42 33 . 1.9 39 53336 G/17/1987 15 .47 4 . 14 0 01 25 1 (3;31:') 5'3)3 3 C-, 9!:,4/1 :1)G I G . 9 0 C)�. 2 1 6 J.8 . 3 G /1986 1(i 533 3 G 3/24/19C?G 1G . 44 1:3 as 1£:3(30:'•' 1.";'3'33G 12/1.2/19 8 5 1Gft85 2 7C) I U U-);51 --- .- 5 G 131.33 9 1. 4 53333331.1 G/I /J. 8;'5 1.6 GO 2 9,) 43 "..9 1)5 5333 G 3 G 3: :1. 4 1) '3 1.2 19 b T- *Jcj& 53336 12726/1984 16.-oa .3. 11,:3 so 18897 53336 x.,410/1984 13,.,24 4.G7 I B B 9 8 53336 G/11'/1984- 14 .20 5. 4:1. S2 J. 8 15,113,313 G 3 2 0/11)B 4 14 11,5 S3 "13 9 8 3 11 49 4 1.2 -J, sa 1(:3`1)01 1533;33G 9f 191/19 83 1G . 22 13 1. J, 17 T E'-T'F-.1)sC-' Z' _7 7 i., T 3308 C* is luR -HLO OE'IHI-LENE 00 Q C. 2- ;)0 FREON 00 Z, 0 . 00 292 D I B R 113 M-0 t1 E T H A N E T p., L 4 Q Q 3 4 5 6 4 s MORE 6 7 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERV110E3 10 11 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS Or" WATER . . . .:'AGE 3 12 1 -) 311p2-2G —— 14 1T r "rART' 2�-5 WELL NO . 53 ^34 1 6 T . 4, 0 E L 1 13 A H S L A N E y 7,8 Is SAMPLE DATE : 12 U A Is 0 T T T!1 V NT !_!i S is N N A 16 17 A NEGATIVE SIGNS SHOULD BE INTERPRETED Ara' A LESS THAN SIGN < 14 --------------------ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION FPB------------------ 20 r rUMENE 0 � 0 0 16 601. 1 M E T-1.ii 111 Y L E T H Y L , 3 r 0 . 00 0 23 40G -'N'E 0. 00 24 17 �q L 11 407 cis D 1CHLOROPROPENE 0 . 00 0 2 0 P"Y L-e-E- 41 ;1 a 00 25 408 TRANS PIGHL 0?,.T,* " Q . QG GO err —p 9-T '1 i;NZ 26 322 1 ,1 .2 TRICHLOROETHANE -5.00 G04 SEC-BUTY1BENZENE 0.00 27 20 78 21 t I s--,9 p 3 JYL!;C4 0. 00 29 T1-r r.A r� 27 7 0 . 0 0 GOG N-BUTYLBENIIENE 31 95 S-TETRACHLOROETHANE -0 .30 i—L T V N 0 0%0 3, 433 1 , 2 13 TF. I-CHLOROPROPANE 0 . 00 '007 Hu-X -,1 L 0 IR'--'P U T A 11- i Z Z 2S-450 212 EJ IGHLGRGI . 0 . 00 34 452 2 CHLO ROE THYLV INYLETHER 0. 00 35I 3627 1 14C 4 WANT M@Rl; 33 2t i , YOU Jetl 30 41 42 31 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER. . . . .PAGE 1 144 45 34—1.A B1.. T C 1 46 is WELL NO . : 53 .336 'Sr S 0-F 71-U T H I L L 1"A N E 19 6 F T W/0 A V E A"N 49 so THAN "I SAMPLE DATE : 1.1/1 9/19921 48 LUE 9 F IWAT _7"WE S,r A NEGAT TVE SIGNS SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS IG N 51 38 B ILL 52 1,L '10 N ------------------- --------------------;�--ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER 31 41 30 G VINYL C'HLOR.IDE -0 . 50 22 5 0 BENZENE I's -- I -0 . ='O n 1=: -1 36 42 305 METInYLENE 'CHLORIDE -0 . 50 4�1 TOLUENE 43 -0 . 50ss 0-9- TRANS, --D-1,C--H L 0 R 0 E T H Y L E N E -0. 50 259 ETHYLBENZENE 159 - 254 O-XYLENE -0 .50 160 300 CHLOROFORM 0.50� 61 46 M— 324 1 , 2 DICHLOROETHANE -0. 50 252 ^ 1. -EN E —0 47 -,5—, p—XYLENE ENIE 321 1 , 1 , 1 TRISCHLOROETHANE -0 . 50 IL 1�j - 65 CAgpQN Tgr Ar'14T QRTrjR —0 so 1 x Y i E NV - 304. RA-Q��-1-1 L - - - - -0 . �o -A so 294- 1 BROMO 2 CHLOROETHANE -0.50 2GG O-CHLOROTOLUENE 1i - = 67 sl 405 1 , 2 DICHLOROPROPANE -0.50 2'G 7 M-CHLOROTOLUENE —00 68 69 70 S2 MORE? 71 72 so 73 ss 74 S6 MORE? 175 176 TRACE OUR13im-AN- It-C ANALYS1S OF WATER . . . .PAGE 2- A VALUE OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR A LEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN ------ --------ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION PPB--------- • � ------------- ----- 310 1 , 1 ,3 TRICHLOROETHYLENE -0 .50 2G8 P-CHLOROTGLUELE -0 . 50 00 6 -) • r. T :: -rti c f5 r f.= m r'"A T t'!�'' n r.rs T 11? 1 G _ --vim- _ a •� _ - - - i .-- 1 293 1 ,2 IrIBkOMO£THANE -0.50 419 1 ,3,5 TkIMETHYLBELZENE -0 . 50 2 420 2 BROMO 1 CHLOROPROPANE -0. 50 418 1 .2:, 4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE -0.50 3 6 _01 >- 50 i1 - ICH � �.s. t-. c7 s 1 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE -0 . 50 412 O -DICHLOROBENZENE NE -0 . 50 7) 6 �? 1"� 1 T r1 ,f •1 320 FREON -0 . 50 435 1 , 1 ,4,5 TETRAMETHYLBENZEN -0.50 u 292 U IBROMOMETHANE -0. 50 437 1 , 2,4 TR IC'HLOROBELZEN E -0.50 9 7 m -yT In -0 - so lc 11 13 .r 1 Isi 13 lil 14 MORE? - 1a Is 20 16 SUZFOLK COUNTY DEPT . OF HEALTH:,ALTH SE RVIChS 21 U 21 It !RACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . . P m G E 3 231 1 1 0 0.4 0 211 WELL NO. : 53,336 S/S OF TUTHILL LAME, 196 FT. W/O WICKMAN ASF: . AND 25 a SAMPLE HATE: II/ 9/1992 127 A L Up_n E 0 00 MFA 1N S T 1_j A T T H E C 0 N 2 111 U E-i -&AS--At=--A N i i..Y-�E rl F r t . 12s! 1LEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BEINTERPRETED ASA L£=5 THAN SIGN 23 •- _ -------- ---ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION cII ------------------ �-2 9 of1 ��IC"1r1i� ,i-OT � � FTr ;Nr -f7 iii C)� i=:`:�!��".Y` �ir:J'%`F�1=. t �',TYki�: �,{'; ) -(; Vii. 321 25 r 2 z T' c '1 T^•-, 1 1•;;_•. n.i 33 26I 40G ,3 D ICHLOROPROPENE -0. 50 601 1 METHYLETHYLBENZ (CUMENE) -0.50 ,1! 1, 4A{0�7 CIS DIC•�HfL+ORfOtPR�OrPENE+1� { -t0� .50 G02 N-PROPYLBENZENE -0 .50 3s! ' 3, '3 tJS j.,;a -NS D1CH1 t1^'t'iPROPENE -0 rf) f' '.f -T i' ��17s'',.aL'.a�/r.. -Q-50 - aI ! 32 1 1J TRICHLOROETHANE -tr50 JJ4or :��L7�1i1r ' L �� -0 . 371 � 138i 30 ' fes'`j•-i-7 m� -3 -TL-eri b F ad i-F•i 4 a c,i- yt ..i-d.:'t iJ�'"4#�i i ;:T .:=n.�-rte.-.� =1..-i-+:L�:L -y (1 I' 31 - - ( v 295 S-TETRACHLOROETHANE -0. 50 GOG L-BUTYLBENZENE -0 . 50 121 33 433 1 ,2,3 TRICHLOROPROPANE -0. 50 G07 HEXACHLOROBUTAIIIENE -0 .50 43 490 r r,• LO�FQPR9PAL€ 0. 50 G-0-S 1 ?2--PIER^`�r1 3--,uL*�-R��-=moi-P 31 3s 452 2 CHLOROETHYLV INYLETHER 0 . 01`:1 1s'16 36 171 v Do 2�gw WANT r-r,„ u 38 sC - 511 39 r n r C r TITEM w 53 11 S: /2 SUFFOLK COUNT! DEP': . OF HEALTH SERYICES ss i"T•,,a n+ - •. 1 - :1 i,l r r• T C j - -'i. P�. ^-�; S6 N LAIC NO. : 119:040 n '5s /5 WELL NO. : 53,33G S/S OF TUTHILL LAME, 196 FT . W/U WICKMAN AVE. AND ;s9 r n T r 9 9 1, - - +60 a - A VALUE .OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CDN ST IlUENT WAS 'O 1 s Z Ei --�R X611 1 - �a�_' Ai-,:•1L' FOR 621 NEGATIVE E In L• 'r, SS THAN SIGN 63 64 u iVa,13AT �VL SIs3t�eo SHO'll,_ BE Ii�T �IiT'RE'.i'EII t�!;-. ri LES' " � . 49 __-------- T it . 1 T-,T� ra' i.T,'�^4T. t ? T• 65 m 302 BROMOD ICHLOROMETHANE -0.50 600 ETHENYLBENZENE ( STYRENE ) -0 .50 66 sl 406 2. 3 DICHLOROPROPENE -0. 50 601 1 METHYLE'THYLBELZ ( CUMENE) -0 . 50 SS ib6ed CIS l407 rOa 1 c n r ZL < l5 JO TRANS 91 . J : � . E. 3 _ J `, _ s _ l_E ,hEN. - . . L .) jj1 _ _ Z 1 , 12 TRIii L. !ET ;A <E -O . _L )04 EC EU i ZEN . ss I/ 1 7;I m J . , 1 , 1 .7 TETRACHLOROETHANE -V. c0 i05 a1 _ ; vviLT- L_itL -CL �� t^ 1 - 3 . J � 175+ 1.1 295 S-TETRACHLOROETHANE -0 . 50 eOG N-PUTYLBENZENE =;( '6 0-149 49 3 . 20 .1 T 1 1 0_ 9 _ :1 1 T.•`.. -0 . 50 r1 r/ L, is 1 T 1'1- ' , EIVICES .: SUFFOLK COUNTY UEF'T. OF HEALTH S • 6 mss r WATER. "- _ - EN = = - _06 : ET --7NWTCK3AHAV ANDANE L ._ � A VALUE OF 0.00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR • { s IVE SIGNS — SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN <' 7 A NEGAT 1 m r r r.r. - _ 1 - - -- - - _ - . _ _ = t >: `,_ - �4 • "-, - /.� :. - - -'_ _ L ' - .. a - - - - --- - - _ - z - - = H t�1t�LI: - - - t�4 ,�0_ ENZEI�IE _ - _ "-311 40: _ ��€°��'� -. _ _ _ - f _-.- � 12 10ill v - - 13 11 32"3 1 , 1 D ICHLOROETHANE 0.00 258 CHLOROBENZENE —3.00 11 12 309 TRANS DICHLOROETHYLEN£ 0.00 259 ETHYLBENZENE —3.00 is 13254- - - ;-tg = 17 "- -=' -fir - :�•-- _: - �' _ _ - - - = -� -" -_- - � �- -� "- -'�� _ _ 14 ? 2 '-� y " '} —XYLENE- S2 - - _ -� - .� =��• - s:� __ =rte_.-_;' " �4 1 2 _D ICHLOROETHANE x _ w OO ..5. �S XYLENE _ - 3.00 _ r_ _ -:=.� - { Y u I a " 21 17 304 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE —1 .00 255 TOTAL XYLENES 0.00 nl ' ,a 294 1 BROMO 2 CHLOROETHANE 0.00 2GG O-CHLOROTOLUENE —3.00 23 R'lWIN _" - Jk -79 J . 4r __ "21 - _ _-�� :28 30 2/ MORE' 31 32 33 - - -' - - _ ' - _ =z:: _ - _ _ - - -' F H A TH-.SERV CES". - . - - ""- - - -3U _�£� -€�:: t1CTN-TY."=`T�EPT. O L I . -sy- s F L - __ 1Irl _ _ - _ _ - F WA - - - .� Vit= -LY IS .0 ��,:_ -- - -" - - -xT�AC�-:�=_ R A I�".ASA " 36 -- i4� �." - Si , 37 - - yam- - - 29 WELL NO. : 53,331E S/S OF TUTHILL LANE, 19G FT . W/O WICEMAN AVE. ANII 31 39 30 SAMPLE DATE: 7/2G/1989 40 T r m m IIIAT 11p r,T, ] r 1 WAG ] OT A T _ 31 - _ - - __ = - 41 _ = _ate=_;>. _ !_ - TED AS A I.ES AN ISN - _ — _ _ RPRE S -TH :S �:A N G`ATi�IE;=�I�a S:.y� C1 L _ -�- - - _ 4232 43 �y - - - s - �r--":s �� �r -- ARTS PEk -B LL CN i� - - ss 303 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE -2.00 2G5 TOTA44 33 L CHLOROTOLUENE 0 .00 1 '+ r If 293 1 ,2 DIBROMOETHANE 0.00 419 113.5 TRIMETHYLBENZENE -3.00 ! ;� h Y - T T r1 •7 +'Y sem- 49 - — 37 - _:_ -^ '•::=-- #� �y�r �•a /fin .y=' - .;-� = i _^t "" _ _ 5 - P .0. �If'i - J_LiN�_:� '? `4 w 00 - - �_ "�1- -_. '3=inti_ ' RC}NI [ M'-=- s - .tQ ,4I _. i IICHL RQ _ _ _ - 50 - s - - �y _ _ - - i, - -_ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ sl - •".�-�_�"� - ' 52- - / - ' - - = �=`ter-_ -- - -'�s����_/ 40 11 308 CIS DICHLOROETHYLENE —4.00 432 P—DIETHYLBENZENE —3.00 s4 t a 320 FREON —4,00 435 1 . 1 ,4 ,5 TETRAMETHYLBENZEN —3.00 K I1 n T 1, - '= - ' IGtL3IEIENE44 K H +, MORE? 62m rill r. � 41 N 66 ' 61- - � - OF- rH-= EkS�I'C;�S., HEAL T -S 110 AV S2 WAT s3 LAB NO. : 789445 71 Q {- WELL NO. : 53,336 S/S OF TUTHILL LAME, 196" FT . W/O WICKMAN AVE. AND - n ss mbnii A t7ALUE OF_:O t?#� �I A�I� ,THA:T_: THE :CONSTITUENT WAS NOT _AAfAL312�D FOR ,,; __ _ _ _ ROMM n --"A NEGAT IVE z S IG N SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN :SIGN ` t VALUEG ARE X., 41-1 PER BILLION P.. 302 BROMOD ICHLOROMETHANE -3 .00 GOO ETHEENYLPENZENE (STYRE =E) 0 .00 400 ..:;33 Di�-:i�.:.a�ZOPROPENE �� .Vit; b 1.� I in'.;Ii LL.i.l�ii..t-y�`!.� tta U:•:.:.'=_.? .. 00 I to - �Nis Il U + 16 17L: II 12 4 22 2s ;GROUND WATER MONITORING WELL HEAVER +'LL 1. 26 WELLNUMI3Ek' 77 LATITUDE: 41002DEi n�2 LONGITU . ` MAP : - --- -- ,, ", I 722936 HAGS'TROM , i 7s TOWNSHIP : SOU'THOLD -- COMMUNITY : CUTCHOGUE ' 22 LOCATION DETAILS : W/S OF ALVAH'S LANE, 17G FT. N/O NYS RT .25 30 -- 71 DESCRIPTION MP FLANGE, IN, MANHOLEELEVA ION Or MP: 22. 22 'ELtVAT10N 0P' LS: '„'`,'3 :�,2''',''`"'A0"' R0X'IMATE IITW :'°' ' 19 ;,''WELl"' DEPTH : 43.751 u AQU ITER: UPPER GLAC IAL L ITHOLOGY:F INE TO COARSE TAN S 'HYDROGEOLOG IC ZN 4 _-- -_-- N OWNER : SCIIIC ---- 11 SCREEN MATERIAL: STEEL SCREENED INTERVAL : 31. .75;--41 . 75 26 _ -_______________________ 2r F IR$T MEASUR„MEN!'T•,; TAKEN! _ - MOST RECENT MEASl1ItMENT WELD. NO DATE;\:.,,'. ,;ti,, tu ' ,W,,: ; ? ; , :`3:V 'pF`'H2q WELL Nq DATE :,a,. DTW ELEV OF H2O 7v 513 3"x'7 12/ "9/7'4':•.;,;.""J.4 ,, 0,:,; 1',: TIME COLLECTED: 1150 3 4 S -IRI NUMBER, 7 LOCATION: W/S OF ALVAH'S LANE, 176 FT. NIO NYS RT. 25 10 REMARKS : A uAT.11F nF O. Co MRANA- TUAI-IHE EnMqTTTHTN:[ WAS NnT kjnLy,;,VT1 V!1L, 13- A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN < 14 MORE? Is 16 LOCATION: 53, 327 W/S OF ALVAH ' S LANE, 176 FT . NIO NYS WT . 25 11 EsT ESb"- MQ/L---Ti ------- --RU 20 Total Solids 0.00 Cobalt -0 . 02 T --- --to lal ZIPId Alk - 8 Depth to H20 0 . 00 Iron 0 . 0 19 . 16 Diss. Solids Lesdi - 0 . 02 Test RESULTS 24 Tr "kT .Alkalinity Manganese -0 . 02 2N h a I y b d e n u mi -0 . 02 ©{td .:-. 005 Ni 01-1- - Chloride 20 .0 Artimony -0. 02 Palladium 0 .00 21 Flouride 0 .00 Arsenic -0 .02 PovBssium 4 . 40 313 .80 J. MICAS 0.00 Beryllium -0. 01 Silicon 33 Nitrate-N 19.70; Boron 0.00 Silver -0 .02 r. -n Ono Tw0um -- i 4-44- Nitrite-N -0.004) Qmium--- Sdontium 0 .22 Ammonia-N -0.02 Calcium 33 . 00 36 O-PO4-P 0 .00 35 Chromium -0 .02 Thallium -c . 05 -V T V T TIR FIELD Temp C 12.0 Titanium -0 . 02 33 FIELD pH 5 .6O Vanadium -0 .Gam. 39 VTPTn "-p-1 0 '7 4 0 MORE? 41 42 r. T TW 0 V k 111 43 PUBLIC X ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY 44 4S 46 SAMPLE NUMBER : 9 , 577 LAD NO. 4-90-180 47 49 SO S1 DATE COLLECTED: 4/25/1990 ---- TIME COLLECTED : 1235 54 SS S6 57 WELL NUMBER: 53. 327 LOCATION : W/S OF ALVAH 'S LANE, 176 FT . NIO NYS RT . 25 '7 ' TRA4�E L iRG AIr I ANA" YSIS S-) GIf-'�a.to • s • s • i}"�'_a.: ' LAE NO. : : 192037 r- WELL NO. : 53.3 7 W/S OF ALVAH ° S LANE, 176 FT . NIO NY Rl.2"5 SAMPLE DATE: 11/ 9/1992 s 6 tr r. m HATmt GONr mt r ;.. 7 r s r. tNA v n- FOR A-,NEGATIVE. SIGNS SHULD =BEi_INTERPRET.ED AS A LESS THAN SIGN � J2 : _ =__ ,` 1L -VALUES -AfiR�-IN -PA-RTS PE-R BILLION PPF--------------- - - ] - _--_--- = a �- _ 4 s 306 VINYL CHLORIDE -0.50 250 BENZENE -0.50 is 6 305 METHYLENE CHLORIDE -0.50_ _ 251 TOLUENE -0.50 7 6 nm t c -.c :�-. 'tom C - - 0 09_ =TRANS DICHLoRoft9YLENE fl 59 K-25 ETHYLBENZENE -0.50 _ � - � "- E�JO ." CHLOROFORM— -��4 = O-XYLENE_ -0.50 12 t1 324 1 ,2 DICHLOROETHANE -0.50 252 M-XYLENE -0.50 - - to 11 is 321 1 , 1 , 1 TRICHLOROETHANE -0.50 253 P-XYLENE -0.50 16 t2 T r, c cc -m ES v i3 = = =..0=.50 __, TGG O-CHL_ORDTOLUENE 70.`10 - -- - 1_ BRDMO 2. CHLOk0E-THANE =.��. = _ - 7777 , .., == < 2- _�... -. _, - - OLUENE `"- -0.50 - T-.= _ `40.7= T,.� DICHLOkOPkOPANE O.-50 " ..6 - M CHLDROT IS_- ," - 20 21 16 22 17 MORE? 23 24 is 2s 19 tb "- MORE?,-;= n 20 21 22 2 30 � • TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . .PAGE _ LAB NO. : 1192037�L L - ]1 - ta—W , n c s r t u VT -t t ' V c 1c in 25 26 SAMPLE DATE:` 11/ 9/199.: v. A VALUE OF 0.00 MEANS--THAT THE�,CO"TITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR - -: - , u • _ - i - - S C Tt^ 37 21 ------------------ -ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION P B------------------ 33 n 39 ,2 TRICHLOROETHYLENE -0 .50 2G8 P-CHLOROTOLUENE -0 .50 40 30 310 1 , 1 202 GHTGROPUR •VT NV - c 2mac n'T y Cul 020101 URNE _ �Ii 42 DIBROMOETHANE Q.50 419 x,3,5 :TRiMETHYLBENZENE- 0_ ; 32 -. . 43 420__'- 2 BROMO -1 EHL'OR{IFROFANE __ 0".50 Vii$ `it,2,4 TRIMETHYLFENZENE -0 .50 - 41 47 3a 311 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE -0. 50 412 0-DICHL0R0BEN:,:'-z"NE -0 . 50 u @GO. CIS c 22, P_rf T T 7 V - -0-5-0 _ _- 49 =.. Y �,)-��d "431=s 1:"1 4 5 TETkAMETHYLB£i+lZ$N -0 50 so FREON_. � � ; _ * _a_ ! 3a ' AK - - .#� ,, `= -`437. .I 4- TR ICHLOkOBENZENE -0.50 292 D IBkOMO�fEfATtE %F '= ! ! _-=- s2 .� -PICHI 13R _ c - s] a - - s4 41 _ 55 I2 ' - - - - -_ - s7 u = sa Wim_ - ys,-- '' s ' _ -- - - _ _ -�=;:-- „ _ = - _ > is .3'fOkE' - - - - "> =- = "= 60 46 17 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES 62 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . .PAGE 3 63 u o6 7 AD kin7 7 7 _ _ _ - - - - - =- - 65 49 17 _ _ _ c-,: - = _ __ -- - - ,- = 64 .. LANE _. G FT:: NIO- NYS_--RT...,, _ _ .- - = _ s. _ = - - st !.SFV'iFLE`DATE>`.` 11I T 2 y — _ - - - - - -__ = - - c.r. WnT t F 69 S& 70 - S3 A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN < n 71 - 54 --------------- ------ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION PPB----------- 7777-qO ,� T — c T t'71 i CT' -- c - = 73 _- - - --'-_ - - - _ 55 ss '=-4a��`2 3 D ICHLOROPRO -bitI �' `=0 50= 601 -1 .METHYLETHYLBENZ (CUMENE) -0. 4 - ' = = 74 . 56 ._! - z c 7s " 4t?fi =CIS D ICHLDROPRiIi'ENE - 07 602 N-PROPYLBENZENE -0.50 - 76 ` -0.50 322 1 , 1 ,2 TRICHLOROETHANE -0.50 G04 SEC-BUTYlBENZENE 43.3 1 ,2,3 TR ICHLOROPROPANE -0.50 607 HEXA CH LOi;OBUT All 1E q CG � ! 450 2,2 It ICHLOROPROPANE -0.50 608 l,,2 it IBR0M0 3 0H LOROPR0"PA 0.Ots 452 2 CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER 0 . 00 ■ 6 po Yr4l11 _ 2 3 3 S r ` SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES _ 6 L 5 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER. . . . .PAGE 1 7 e 9 -W£LL �t0. : .,3 3�.7� � _ / OF -ALVAH S LAME, i7G FT, N/0 NYS- kT.�.,, - _ - . lo f =. - n --S_AMPLE DATE: - - -THAT I r -WAS NOT ANAT YZEU F � 13 13 10 A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN < 1+ " -----ALL VALUES ARE IN PARTS PER BILLION PP 15 ---------------- F----------- 12 -- - to 13. _ - _ 17 :30&_. -VINYL CHLORIDE - 0.00 _ 254_ . BENZENE-- _ - -3.00 _ - : � - 'a SOS= METHYLENE CHLOkIbE,t _=' 0.04 " 251 , TOLUENE -_ -3.00 1, -x _¢ 040 arc _ 20 21 " 309 TRANS DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.00 259 ETHYLDENZENE -3. 00 22 • - 17 300 CHLOROFORM -5.00 254 0-XYLENE -3.00 23 u _ 2/ 25 32 ' . . s DSCHLC3k0ETlAi £ _ -. _4:04 25'?_"- M-XYLENE':_ -3=.00 = =4 . :. 26 n 321:=rT20 k CHLORDETHANE -"_ ��.00 253 P- XYS�ENE �= -3.00 = � �= 27 ' _1 3 r r 2t zz 29 294 = 1 BROMO 2 CHLOROETHANE 0. 00 26G O-CHLOROTOLUENE -3.00 30 i 44.5 1 ,2 DICHLOROPROPANE 0. 00 267 M-CHLOROTOLtiENE --3. 00 " 1 r 32 33 34 MORE? 13S 36 37 n r MORE? 38 M 39 30 Q1 r s r • G 41 31 42 _ _ .mss`._- Vit: ANALYSIS-iS OF WATER.`__. . , .PA�E 2 -- = -- _ _ - - - - -� = kACEy13kGAN IG - LA& N44 0. , _ .- 7 ? v43 - i - _ - _. '. _. . ..` 6s 3S SAMPLE DATE : 7/2G/1989 _ 46 >6 A VALUE OF 0.00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR 47 " A=> = - = - --- - _ "Z_UE kE IN PARTS:_PER: BILLION, PPE-------_-- --------- - - - 3a: - -' - �q t- -mss =` r 7tf Y 2 Tk C#IL E t =--5.04 - 50 '2G3 TF'=CRL0R0T0L.UEHE -3.0000 52 sl 293 1 ,2 DIBROMOETHANE 0. 00 419 1 ,3,5 TRIMETHYLBEINZENE -3.00 H _: n 420 2 BROMO 1 CHLOROPROPANE 0.00 418 1 ,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE -3 . 00 41 S6 ' - - - =_ - 42 - = = - - � - - -_-tri,=�`.- Sl - __ - - =--'' � - ' - - -_ 0 hl2 O=DIC NZ NE - _ -4.00 _. - - 1� TETRAGHLO. t4,ET��C , - 0 _ HLOROBE E _ _ ._ IS ,- - 'moi -HT OR 0 _ - 61 320 FREON -4.00 435 1 , 1 ,4,5 TETRAMETHYLBENZEN -3 .00 } v 43 292 DIBROM�OMETHANE 0.00 437 1 ,2,4 TRICHLOROBENZENE -4.00 663 4 _- ,-r_ 0 4gg 1 1�3 TR rrNTnunur NSE_ -�-�0. 65 66- yssso PIN- -91 68 - s- S3 70 K MORE? 72 73 + ' SUFFOLK -COUNTY -IEPT OF-,HEALTH SERVICES - "„ - _ - "i. 76 _ _ r - _ ; = 3 S6 �. - z - - - _ -TRAM ;..ORGAN IC" ANALYSIS 01.-__ WATER' : . .PAGE 3 176 WEL-L- NO . : 531327 • W/S OF ALVAH'S LANE , 17G FT . N/O NYS R-1 . 215- .__ ` '' •' vV-A.. I.-A.,A\ LATITUDE: 410059 LONG ITUDE: 7..29'7 H I)GIS T R M Pi A P 23-1-1•-::39 TOWNSH IP: SOUTHOLD C 0 M M U N IT Y.", CUTCHOGUE LOCATION DETAILS: WS DEPOT LA. . .0.7 MI SO MIDDLE Rll .'. . FIREWELL ,"D,ESQR IPT-19IN 10 w -, 94EVATIO,N OF MF: ""26. 89 NNECT L E V 4 T I Q N 0 F A4 P1 Mk�_A,,\3 W4L'L',,"DHPTH: �0. 00'" 'Acvjlm-� GL ' HYDROGEOLOGIC ZN 4 4 ('.)WNER : CUTCHOGUE F.11 s SCREEN MATERIAL : SCREENED INTERVAL: ------------------ --------- ENT, N' "I., --k-G- R-C-ENT MEAS-F,I R S M E A, 7 T----------7AOST WELL N O,"�,' D W'P� H201 WELL NO , DATE" RTW ELEV UF ' H20 1op390 2G .89 `2 2 i 0 4 B 6 10 -L.1 0 p 390 12"/28/93 0 . 00 --------------------------- -------T._________--MAX--------------------------- - - 13 MINIMUM DEPTH TO A R IMUM DEPTH TO WATER WELL NO DATE RTW ELEV OLIL20_1WELL NO if A T*E DTW ELEV OF 1120 13 10 390, 12/28/93 26.49 1 lov390 1,2/12 9 1 2 1_7 4.72 14 ----- -------- Is NUMBER OF-RE §UKREPT§-TAF,,ERR -----y5-- i-M--EA-N-ELEVATION-OF-WATER-SUREACE: ----8-72-7 la MORE? 18 53324 R,,,"MON ICOR ING WELL ''HEADER 21 : WELL' NUMBER: 53324 LAT ITUDE: 410104 LONGITUDE : 72:3033 HAGSTROM M F-P-'. 2 --3 U-,T-1 0 13 TOWNSHIP : S 0 U T 1-10 L D COMMUNITY: EAST MATTITUCK' 21 1..(')(.',ATION DETAILS : E/S OF ALVAH 'S LANE, 224 FT . 14/0 COUNTY "ROAR RT. 2 7777 . 26 DESCRIPTION MP : FLANGV' , IN MANHOLE ELEVATIDN' OF . MP : 42.51 2� ELEVATION OF LS : 44 .21 ' APPROXIMATe RTW: 37 WELL DEPTH : G1w83 A-(-4L1 .1*FER: UPPER GLAC lAl. L I T HOLOG Y : COAR 3-E-T-*T-Y-.1.Nl-.", )L OWNER : SCDEC' 30 SCREEN MATERIAL : STEEL, SCREENED INTERVAL.' 419. 83-59 . 813 ----------- 37 ------ 31 WELL ND -- DATE RTW ELEV OF HMO WELL NO DATE RTW ELEV OF H2O 10/ 6/75 3G. 69 5. 82 531,324-712-7-28/93 37 . 03 5 . 48 ----DEPTH------TO----WATER----------------------MA'AIMUM--------DEPTH--------TO--WATER "----------------- 36 MINIMUM WELL NO DATE RTW„ - ELEV OF H2O1 WELL NO 11 E DIT W ELEV OF 1-120 53 ,324 G/11/84 '9.36 53y324 11/20/81 38.99 3. 52 39 ------------ 40 -UP-REASURME'N A ELEVATION 0 '.R ----6..-- ----- ------7777-- +: ----- ----- - . N - MBE; TS T K .'N: 1-10 R E';' 43 44 $RECNO - WELL-NU MBE'R''�`DATE ' "DEPTH-TO-WATER ELEV-OF-WS451 17952 53324 . -12/26/1993 37.03 5.48 16 17 17 53324 9/13/1.993 36 . 30 17954 53324 6/2"-3/1993 34. 5°) 7 . 92 17955 53324 6/1-G/1.987 34 . 42 8 . 09- 49 1795G, 533 .. 7 . 15 .,33"34 4/l 9 8 6. 37. 44 5 .02 :17957 sl 17958 533241 ' 1 9/23/1986 37 .52 4.99 s2 3'2'4 6 7 1.G 7 S3 I 79GO 53:324 3/18/1986 37 . 70 4 .81. A 7 9 G 1 53324 12/12/1-985 38 . CV.-I 4 . 49 G/738 'J'/.b SS 5 s' 1.7963 53324';`;,.' ,,;:~,,;,''6/'11/3985 37 ,26 5.25 17964 53324 3/ 6/1985 3G.3G 9 G 5 533.74-- 9. 179GG 53324 9/11/19B4 3;3 . G7 4 7 .1796 533:34 G 1. 1. 1.984 ;3' . J.ED :1.796)8 53324 ;3/',.22/1984 34 . 3'� J.7969 5 3F.*-4 9/1.9/1.()S 3 35. 7(-i 6 1.7970 53324 G/ 8/1983 ;34 . 98 17 .5 3 17971 53324 3/31/1983 3G . G13 5 . 85" 53324 37 . 20 IJ L .1.797'2 12)/2*7/19 B �6 .1.7•)73 53324 9/17/1982 36 . 12 6 . 39 m GR L.,17- A WALwE OE . . 0 1 nEppS i:.", 1 1E CDNST1TLz . - "b r 0 arm � . L A A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE !NTERPREZED a0RE- io - 7 ION: 53,327 W/S OF ALVAH 'S LANE, 176 FT. N/O NIS RT .25 ;T RESULT TEST ---RESULT MG/L...TEST--------RESjLT 10til bolias 0 . U0 60031-t. -O.Oi 7ield Alk. 0 . 00 sopper -0. 01 :4- 2 i6w% Gallds 0 . 0 F 81" &1,01d - Test RESULTS Lead -0.02 MG/LITER Magnesium 4 .34 T . Alhtlin&Y Molybdenum 0 .00 Aluminum 0 . 04 Nickei -0.01 Flouride 0.00, Arsenic 0 .00 Potassium 4.50 Sulfate 45.0 Barium 0.09 Seleneium -0.01 BAS 0 . 00 Beryllium 0 .01 wm - 2. 49 Nitrate-N 9 . 50 Boron 0 . 00 Silver- 0 . 01") Nitrite-N 0 . 000 Cadmium -0 . 010 s o d 1 u 11-1 7 .941 {Jia -4&,Aa4�- 0. 02 -1--leium 20-12 stpanhti I-PO4-P 0.00jz Chromium -0.01 Thallium 0 .00 -OTAL P 0.00 FIELD D.O. 0.00 Tin 0.00 FIELD Temp 6 G- 0 TitaQH"l 0 .00 FIELD pH 4 . 90 Vanadium -0 . 01 FIELD Cond . 0 .0 Zinc -O. Oi 0 R En SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY NG . 587529 SAMPLE NUKEaqRil DATE COLLECTED : 5/27/1987 T jME 66LEEETED! WELL NUMBER: 53, 324 LOCATION! E/S OF ALVAH' S LANE, 224 FT . NY Nli ROAD R! - 2 REMARKS: A VALUE OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALIZED FuR A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE iNTERPRETED AS A LESS ThAN SIGN - sr E? AGGATION; 62, B24 GAS OF ALVAHOS LANG, 224 ST . MAC COUNT! ROAP RT -2 ST RESULT--------TEST---- ...RES LT MG/L---T:.=1........ RES. 0 MG/L zeta! solids Q . QQ coba0 Field Alk. 0 .00 Copper 0 .00 Depth to H2O 34. 19 Diss. Solids 0 . 00 Iron 1 .70 Tget e a di iG/LITER hal- eElum 2 , 0 2 T .Alfaiinity - ' 322 . -- 1 , 1 ,2 TRICHLOROETHANE -5. 00 G04 SEC-BUTYIBENZENE a.00 F - L • "' ' , 409 111 , 1 ,2 TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.00 605 iSDPkOPXLTULUENE(P-CYMENE) 0 . 00 295 S-TETRACHLOROETHANE -3. 00 GOG N-BUTYLBENZENE ' 6 i rr, 0.00 �.2,"D ICHLOR(341 7 -. - - - - J4 �: -CHLOROETHY_L�-INYLE� ., s U0 YOU WANT MORE _ > opiu- � 4 "FF _ HEALTH - yam= -. - - lo LAB NO. : �` 0 587529 q. 11 �7 11. WELL NO. : 53,324 E/S OF ALVAH'S LANE, 224 FT. N1O COUNTY ROAD RT .2 A__-tlALUE OF 0.-00 -ME( NS_ FfA HE CO NST ITUANALYZED -FOR - ENT WAS NOT - � A NEGATIVE SIGNS. t3 _ - = - - _ - ls �s _ E= I�iTERFRETED- �1Sf A L£S- r` S THAM aN."� _ --- - - _ _ Tlt- 17 "30G VINYL CHLORIDE 0 .00 P rWT Qrj Trip 250 BENZENE ti: � c 19 - - - = -3. 00 � , _ -' ' �3.04 = _ --- 20 - OS .xTKAN-S = _, _ .. = - :1 -- - -�; - - -- - '_ � ==x.00 =2`9 =.ETHYL �-���- _ - =�- _ 72 - - BENZ£IE_ s .� R. . u 324 1 , 2 DICHLOROETHANE 0. 00 252 M-XYLENE _3.00 _ - -= _ - - -- S04 2 _- - =- - - - - Ir a� TACHLRITOTAL 0.00 -0a JJ -XYLEI:6 _� 7-2 = 2 CHLtRE0 . GGO-GHLIROTOLUEN£ MORE? a' . m 11 - — _ r 37 — — - " ' 33 zs SUFFOLK: COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES4-1 x TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . . PAGE 2 41 17 LAB 5 c2 c t : - - : _ . -- _ '- -- `� 4OAD S A ► Nsa :WELL NO. S3 324 EfI0_COUHT49 sc - - j= SAI•fP1.E ATE - ^' -. .. i51 a A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN < - -------------------- + ,7 - -ALL VALUES ARE Its! PARTS PER BILLION PPB------------------ s u ss_c , a 343 ' CHLORQDIBROfOMETH_ ME =_".. .�-� 2:0 _ = -- .= _ - _ 0 ..GJ --TOTAL CHLOROTOLUEN£� 56 - _ _ _ :f �E. = 0.00 :- _ - " ;s7 6s 293 -_. 1,2 L IRROifOETHANE , _ __ _ > : - = =_ =;.5=: -=- - $a O r 00 - -419 _.1 ,3,5 TR IMETHYL-BENZENE 3.00 . . 420 2 PROMO 1 - _ = - 00 s9 47 -5.00 415 M,P-DICHLOROBENZENE -4 .0061, t u 67: K 50 GIS DICHLOROETRYLENE-= _ � =x#:00 43'' vu - _ .� _. 4 , P-DIETHYLBENZENE _ - ..3.00 - -- —�� _ - - _ 0 - - - - = - _ c ,, =" 4:00 _ 43J Y1 , I 4,5 TETRAMETHYLBENZEN' =3.00 ' = - 497 1 ,2, 4 TR' 1Qr 66 i. .,_. s3 307 1 , 1 DICHLOROLTHYLENE 0. 00 438 1 , 1 ,3 TRICHLDROBE_N__ -5. 00 - w S4 7o n ss n s6 -MORE? - = -` - 73 - 57 - _ — = _ Jr R n P 75 1ft _ t 76 WELL NO . : 53,324. E/S OF ALVAH °S LAME , 224 FT . N/O COUNTY ROAD RT .2 SAMPLE DATE : 5/27/1587 A VALUE OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BEINTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN 6 r.• t 1 !N' r n r r v 302 _ BROMOD ICHLOROMETHANE =3.04 G04 - v ' : _ ETHENYLBENZENE (ST. fiENE) 0. 40 3 40G 2, 3 DICNLOROPkOPENE =::0.40 601 1 METHYLETHYLEENZ (CUMENE) 0. 04 s 408 TRANS DICHLOROPROPENE 0.00 603 TERT-BUTYIBENZENE 0, 00 6 322 1 , 1 ,2 TRICHLOROETHANE - -5.00 604 SEC-BUTYIBENZENE 0.40 7 =449 1;1 , 1 2 TE TRACHLOROETHAKE -==_ a : = tf. 0 605 -I_SQPROf�YLTOLUENE(Y- YMEN "- G E S 0.00 V295 - S-TETRACHLOROETHANE - 3.00 . GOG N -.BUTYLBENZENE = _ 0.04 422 1 121 T, Vg iGNI Q " s r II 450 2,2 DICHLOROPROPANE 0.00 GOB 1 ,2 DIBROMO 3 CHLOROPROPA 0 .00 12 452 2 CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER 0. 00 13 = I:0 YOU WANT MORE 1/ -._ - tsW. 17 to SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES m n r .iIG r C i. T _ _ . .PAGRZ ` 10 = AEt NO. . `387403 ` ktE -----RT. 21 LL NO. : 53",3:.4_. -.E/S OF ALtJAH S' LANE, X24 FT. "t�/0' COUiTY ROAD2 ,. ., n - : - 23 A VALUE OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CONST ITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR ? 3 . 21 _I NEGATIVE SIGNS - S'r,OULi. BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN ••. - ----------- ------- 3 3. 26 _ - __- - " = 3 27 306 VINYL CHLORIDE -0.00 - 20J0 BENZENE -3.0028 v r t r' n r U9 9 . 00 29 323 1 , 1 DICHLOROETHANE 0 .40 258 CliLOROBENZENE -3. 00 30 305 TRANS DICHLOROETHYLENE 0. 00 255 ETHYLBEN7;L3 NE - . 00 31 900 (311LORGEORK w 254 `� a 1 33 324 -1 ,2 DICHLOROETHANE 0.00 252 M-XYLENE -3 .0034 921 1 , 1 , 1 - = Tmf = _ 3s 304 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, -1 . 00 255 TOTAL XYLENES - 0 . 00 C 36 294 1 BROMO 2 CHLOROETHANE 0 . 00 2GG 0-CHLOROTOLUENE -3 .00 /. 37 405 1 ,2 PlGHL9RQRRG-PAN-_ 0. 00 st 40 1' /1 /2 MORE'' s- /3 u SUFFOLF. COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES _ .s _ S. Is TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER . . . .PAGE 2 6� 61 „ WELL NO . : 53 .324 E/;; OF ALVAH°S LANE. , 224 FT. N/J COUNTY ROAD RT .2 sd SAMPLE DATE : 3/IG/i987 19 M l: 1 2 THAT T E 7<� E1^' _ ?�o f Y', ter! T'• 61 3r�a-4d r i 44-i' .r-- iF a' so A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD' BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN 6s s1 ---------------------ALL VALUES ARE -IN PARTS LER BILLION PPB-=------ s2 Ll�--�^--�T172-TR Clib9�2 }IY E"E 5 45 -1IG2 1� G'T nun 1-iT 11• ;�t� -----_�-� 6a S3 303 CrILORODIBROMOMLiii�.,L -.: . U67 O .:�,� DOTAL CrILGnL�OLUENE 0 , 00 tc st 253 1 ,2 Dt IBROMOETHANE r 0 . 00 419 1 , 3 ,5 TR IM ETHYLF'ENZE- -3 .00 7, SSI �°en'.`d .moi.-iYR!0 M{'-I-f `1-�,rte.,'1 T i.l- :I Pill� 1 °.~i.•I� 4 S6' 301 BROMOFORM -5 .00 45 M, P-DICHLDROBENZENE -4 . 00 T. t i v-�:)•-t.-ti,---i.rte.-. 1+L -f vT '{ -•l .��-l%-- --4-:.-... - :-.r Ya+..:i��a�.i• i+N an".E�i-T 31033 C yS D ICU7 f-.-I:u:� ..::LF^!E �T° ' -. i• ri IE`` PEN2'E :E� s _� l t i u L ^ | | ! � i | / . ' ^ MBAS 0 .00 Beryllium 0. 00 S 11 or, Iv -1 011 Ul 0.000 sodiwil 28 .00 S TOTAL P 0 . 00 FIELD D.O. 0. 00 Tin 0 . 00 6 FIELD Temp C 10 . 0 Titanium 0. 00 11 SUFFOLk COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY 12 PUBL IC X ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY 15 NO 3 b7 o 17 23 25 71 29 REMARKS 30 31 32 33 MORE -' 35 37 TEST .2 38 40 41 Depth to H20 40. 4G Diss. Solids 0 . 00 Iron -.-0 . 05 42 Test RESULTS Lead 0 . 00 43 png anese bl�bdenum 0 . 00 Chloride 26 . 0 48 Flour ide 0 . 00 Arsenic 0 . 00 Potass itim 49 so AS- 0 ; 00 silicon 0 . 00 aro 0 .00 0 . 00 440 52 0 . 00 FIELD pH Chloride 30. 0 Antimony 0 . 00 palladium 0 . 00 �louride 0 . 00 Arsenic 0 . 00 Potassium 7. 00 � Sulfate l6 . O Barium 0 .00 Seleneium 0 .00 MBAS O . 00 Beryllium 0 .00 Silicon 0.00 ^ / / 0 06 .50 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY PUBL IC & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY E 146 � | LdCLAN 22 V T / / A NEGATIVE SIGNS SHOULD BE INTE�PRETED LOCATION: 53, 324 E/S OF ALVAHIS LANE, 224 FT. NIO COUNTY ROAD RT. A2 Depth -to H20 40. 4G Diss . Solids 0 . 00 Iran -0 .05 Test RESULTS Lead 0 .00 4aripmc 4 Ifni 220 ' / | � . � Chloride 26 .0 Antimony 0 . 00 palladium '' .0 ] ! | Flour ide 0 . 00 Arsenic 0 . 00 Potassium 7. 00 � . . ' ' ' ' -- _-'--_- 0 00 ' muo� ` �� V ' �g�ylliUm ' - � 0 i���bn ' ' O ard' - - --- -- A0mODi8-N 1 . 90 C�lei um 15. 00 Strontium 0 . 00 O-PO4-p 0 .00 Chromium 0 . 00 Thallium 0. 00 � FIELD Temp C 12.0 Titanium IE-- ,H ' ' 00 . a n a d i' u m 0.400 1 2 t ',�',., ', 1\ '',' H I„',�I + a+',,Y,Z� r .d� \\ I •I \t ';,' 1 � '"1 „r. 4 S 6 7 - -" 10 � I1 fi 12 17 Th, is 16 17 Is F w 2 _ rt, - - .F 21 w� 23 24 .1 L' ,}•*,r'� "., -1/#4 - j� i ,r'. .} L.4 uu }+ h� ' 0 f{ oij Fs: - 16 27 23 - 29 SAMPLE NUMBED: 9 ,87G LAIC NO . 11-92-52 30 31 f " 32 542. 4. *r�"Frx r t-. - - - Y y'k �6{ fi3e.... y c�-s` nn - - 33 J/J M- 4" 34 35 TIME COLLECTED: 215 36 37 33 e r - t yy ki �,a ,akl 1i : L �� M 1{ A' 3� � t -.._3_s-s.:,:yrr. 'c:,• .. ..., - yam:: 40 h 41 LOCATION: S/S OF TUTHILL LAMES 196 FT. W/O WICEMAN AVE. AND 42 43 �.S: #• p` _ L �± t1 ,s h A �.������,`�`� ���NS�j ��� �{ ��� xx� ���:� �� t�ax�- ��,�.���.��. AOR 46 47 M 0 R E 7 w 49 4a so I,[?C T IOC: X73 SSG /S OF TUTH ILL LANE# -196 FT'. W/O WIG}��iF1J�. AVE. A`��I�.= r s1 TEST R&SU-LTS -TEST _ tSt1LT tGlL TEST - _ = INSULT t�G( 52 .. S3 Total Solids 0. 00 C a b a I t -0 . 02 r A Field Alk.. 0.00 Copper -0 . 02 Q :t ss _ -- nTVs' - = 02 S4t - e�r� 57 :,ur� .ITEIfagr�esiunt - = - 7 .80 MaRqaFl M01yt��_lerlum -0 .02 1 Aluminum 0 . 05 Nickel -0 .02 ,j i..i ._. ���,e J l� ., U _`-:]i' .L Ij n'1 l) . l!•:,J `-i fa ra _-- -. -f `i BAS 0 . 00 B.ery'aiilani + t:: Nitrate-N 15. 80 - ur on 0 . 00 i l`JeT' -0 0 Nitrite-N 0 . 000 � ��nliurl� -0 . 020 :so�liun2 x'0 . !)0 1 r t+v---`v�'r-C)rte:ur' 40,_ �- 2 0-PO4-P 0.04 Chrom1un) -0 .02 Thallium ••-0 .-0 3 TOTAL P O. UO :. FIELD D.O. 3. 40 Ti r, 0 . 00 4 i2 5 Ti S FIELD pH 5 . 40 Vanadiun-1 -0 . 02 6 �- IEL11 Corid . 319 . 0 Zinc 0. 04 E? 7 SUFFOLk% COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY PUBLIG IQ •,. r'T7 S' . I1 • 12 13 + 11 ... IS s 17 DATE COLLECTED: 4/25/1990 la 21 - 12 2 23 WELL NUMBER: 53 , 336 24 25 L R'27 26 RIaMAR I-S 21 n A VALUE OF 0. 00 MEANS THAT THE CONSTITUENT WAS NOT ANALYZED FOR 30 A NEGATIVE SIGNS - SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS A LESS THAN SIGN ; 31 32 • 33 - .. {� Nor" " �.. � - ...- - .. - _ 34 • 3s _TEST-----------RESULT TEST____ ___RESULT Mr,/L___TEST RESULT M1 /; -------- 36 3a Fe� 4� 1M,. . �}�OQ' �- - Copper -0 .01 39tch. toi20` ,14 :',_:. Diss, Sal ids 0 . 00 Iron * = U . 0"l 41 MG/LITER M:a.3neSilam c . 7 ; 42 T .Alk.•alinity M-ani �rll se 0 . 0 43 N - la{21i(tun1 E tFt�Jn't CL a�-- (:hlorid4a 0. 0 Nickel -0 .01 a 71 .0 Antimany -•0, 01 Palladium 0.00 - � m 47 Sulfate 68. 0 Barium 0. 08 SeIerlei.l;nt -•0 . 07. „ MBAS 0 .00 Beryllium -0 .01 Silicon 5 . 38 Atitrite- :. 0. 00p - Cad ri any': -4.0I0 Sodi3�m 25. 10 s, Amnio ,ia N =0.02 Calcium:.' 37 .71 Stroritiunt 0 . 00 st00 - i�nl S3 TOTAL P 0. 00 FIELD D. 0 . -0 . 00 Tin 0 . 010 54 FIELD Temp C 0 . 0 Titaniun, 0 . 00 $6 IELD Cond . 0.0 Zinc -0.01 51 SORE':' REVIEW OF WATER QUALITY DATA GREAT PECONIC BAY SHELLFISH GROWING AREA #28 1990 - 1993 DATA APRIL 1994 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION BUILDING #40, SUNY CAMPUS STONY BROOK, NEW YORK 11790-2356 I. INTRODUCTION/AREA DESCRIPTION This report reviews the water quality data collected from Great Peconic Bay, Shellfish Growing Area (SGA) 128, and makes recommendations for a change in classification for a 9 acre portion of-the Bay-. Great Peconic Bay is bordered by Flanders Bay and Little Peconic Bay between the North and South Forks of Long Island. The Bay is located within the Towns of Riverhead, Southampton and Southold, in the County of Suffolk (FIGURE 1) . The average depth of Great Peconic Bay is 20 feet with an average tidal range of approximately 3 feet. The physical characteristics of the bay (large area, depth and tidal range) result in a strong flushing rate following periods of local rainfall. The Great Peconic Bay SGA contains approximately 19, 060 acres. Approximately 100 acres of this growing area are uncertified for shellfish harvesting. Of the 100 acres closed, 68 are seasonally uncertified for shellfish harvesting from April 1st through December 14th. These shellfish lands are open to harvesting each year from December 15th through March 31st. Tributaries which may effect the water quality of Great Peconic Bay are: East Creek, Brushs Creek, Horton Creek, James Creek, Deep Hole Creek, Halls Creek, Downs Creek, West Creek, Sebonac Creek Complex, Cold Spring Pond, Shinnecock Canal, Squire Pond and Red Creek (FIGURE 2) . The SGA classification of each tributary is listed in (TABLE 1) Sebonac Creek Complex (SGA 161) , Cold Spring Pond (SGA #62) and Shinnecock Canal (SGA #10) are separate shellfish growing areas. These areas will be evaluated in separate water quality reports. The Peconic River flows into Flanders Bay approximately five miles west of Great-- Peconic Bay. The Riverhead--Sewage ---- Treatment Plant outfall flows into the Peconic River approximately one mile west of where the river meets Flanders Bay. Great Peconic Bay flows into Little Peconic Bay, through the north and south "races" by Robins Island, which drains into Gardiners Bay. Shinnecock Bay is connected to Great Peconic Bay by the Shinnecock Canal located near the south central part of the bay. Great Peconic Bay is tidally influenced by Flanders Bay, Little Peconic Bay and Shinnecock Bay. 2 Great Peconic Bay supports a significant number of recreational boaters during the warm weather months (May to September) of the year. Access to the south shore of Long Island Bay (Shinnecock Bay) through the Shinnecock Canal has increased boating activity in Great Peconic Bay. Marina facilities are located in East Creek, James Creek, Sebonac Creek, Cold Spring Pond and Shinnecock Canal. James Creek, Sebonac Creek and Cold Spring Pond are all seasonally closed to shellfish harvesting when the marinas are active. East Creek and Shinnecock Canal are uncertified throughout the year preventing any shellfish harvesting in the vicinity of their respective marinas. Large populations of migratory waterfowl frequent Great Peconic Bay during the cold weather months (October to April) of the year. Waterfowl are a potential pollution source through direct fresh fecal discharge into shellfish growing area waters. Water sampling is conducted during the winter migratory months to monitor any effect the waterfowl may have on the growing area. Two underwater lots used to receive transplanted shellfish are located near the northern end of Robins Island. These lands are owned by Mr. John Scott. Under direct supervision of the Bureau of Shellfisheries, Shellfish Management Unit, shellfish are harvested from designated uncertified growing areas (e.g. Raritan Bay) and transplanted to these certified lots (FIGURE 2) for natural biological cleansing. Sampling stations have been created to routinely monitor the water quality by these lots (FIGURE 3) . II. MAP OF SAMPLING STATIONS Water sampling stations are located throughout the Great Peconic Bay SGA (FIGURE 3) . Sampling stations are located near actual and potential pollution sources which may adversely affect the water quality of the SGA. The majority of sampling stations in Great Peconic Bay are located near the mouths of tributary creeks which receive the discharge from storm drains during local rainfall events. These sampling stations have been established to monitor the impact of the tributary creeks on the water quality of the bay during these events. It has been documented that stormwater runoff is a significant contributor of bacterial loading into the surface waters of shellfish growing areas. Continued shoreline development often results in increased non-point source runoff which may degrade water quality in locally affected areas. 3 The pollution sources for the Great Peconic Bay SGA have not changed since the last Water Quality Report written in March 1991 ("Review of 1988 - 1991 Water Quality Data Great Peconic Bay Shellfish Growing Area 12811) . A complete listing of the pollution sources which have the potential to affect the Great Peconic Bay Shellfish- Growing••Area is- contained in "Shoreline Survey Report Great Peconic Bay Shellfish Growing Area 28 April 199111 . III. SAMPLING PLAN AND JUSTIFICATION A. Adverse Pollution Condition Sampling All New York State shellfish growing areas must be sampled a minimum of five times per year under adverse Pollution conditions (APC) . APC sampling is defined as collecting water samples on an ebbing tide within 96 hours of a rainfall event between 0.25 to 2.99 inches. A rainfall event of 3.0 inches or greater in a continuous 24 to 36 hour period is considered an "excess rain" condition. In the event of an "excess rain" condition the affected growing area is temporarily closed to all shellfish harvesting. This procedure is discussed in greater detail in SECTION IV of this report. Precipitation data were collected daily at the following locations and times: (1) Riverhead Sewage Treatment Facility by Town Personnel (-0800 hours) ; (2) South Jamesport by Cornell Cooperative Extension Agent Tom Kowalsick (-0730 hours) . These data are used to determine if APC exist and if sampling would be appropriate. Rainfall variations have been documented throughout Long Island. Local rainfall events occurring in isolated portions of Long Island sometimes make APC water sampling determinations difficult. When available, rain gauge readings from adjacent areas (Peconic, Southold and Southampton College, Southampton) are used to check the geographical distribution for a specific rainfall event. B. Meteorological and Hvdrographic Effects and Variability in Data The variability of rainfall will affect the bacterial loading into a growing area. As was stated earlier in this report stormwater runoff is a major contributor of bacterial loading into surface waters. A rainfall event in the one to three inch range will have a greater negative impact on the growing area than one of less than an inch. 4 Other physical parameters such as wind direction/ intensity and extreme tidal stages will also affect growing areas. Extreme tides and strong onshore winds will often cause flooding of shoreline regions and supplementary runoff when these conditions recede. Flooding may tax sewage treatment plants and -cause sewer--systemsto back- up resulting in bacterial loading into the adjacent growing area. C. Random Sampling Systematic Random Sampling does not apply to the Great Peconic Bay shellfish growing area. The SGA is affected by pollution point sources. IV. WATER QUALITY SAMPLE DATA ANALYSIS Using a three tube, three dilution MPN procedure, bacteriological water quality at a station is acceptable if the median total coliform (TC) MPN/100 mL is 70 or less AND no more than 10% of the samples exceed a TC MPN/100 mL of 330; OR; if the median fecal coliform (FC) MPN/100 mL is 14 or less AND no more than 10% of the samples exceed a FC/100 mL of 49. The water samples analyzed for this evaluation were collected from January 25, 1990 to December 1, 1993. The bacteriological water quality data are shown in TABLE 2A and 2B. The Environmental Database (TABLE 3) lists the physical factors which have the potential to affect each water sampling run such as: tide stage, rainfall, wind direction and velocity. Water samples were evaluated as APC only if collected on an ebbing tide. The following abbreviations concerning the tide stage are used in TABLE 3 : HE = high ebb; ME = mid ebb; LE = low ebb; HS = high slack; LS = low slack; FL = flood; LF = low flood. Each data analysis has been divided into three conditions for the National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) statistical data analysis: (1) "Dry,,; (2) "Moderate Rain"; (3) "Excess Rain" (TABLE 4) . The "Dry" condition refers to water sampling runs conducted after a rainfall event of less than 0. 25 inches in a given 24 hour period. The "Moderate Rain" condition represents the APC (0. 25 to 2 .99 inches of rain in a 24 hour period) used for shellfish growing area classification . The "Excess Rain" conditions represent all rainfall events of 3 . 00 inches or greater in a continuous 24 to 36 hour period. The "Excess Rain" condition was deliberately exaggerated by adding 10. 0 inches 5 to the rainfall amount in TABLE 3 to ensure exclusion from the NSSP statistical analysis. The Bureau of Shellfisheries has adopted a strategy to temporarily close shellfish growing areas which have been affected by an "Excess Rain" event. This strategy was instituted because of the extraordinarily adverse effect caused by the quantity of runoff generated from a rainfall event of this magnitude. In this case an "Emergency Closure" is declared and any growing area affected is temporarily closed to all shellfish harvesting until it can be determined that water quality again meets certified growing area standards. Both the "Dry" and "Excess Rain" conditions are excluded from the APC analysis. V. SAMPLING RESULTS AND AREA CLASSIFICATION: The NSSP statistical analysis for the Great Peconic Bay Shellfish Growing Area is shown in TABLE 4. All water samples for this analysis were collected under APC. A review of the 1990 to 1993 water quality data for Great Peconic Bay shows that sampling stations #61 #7A, #7B, #8, #8A, #9 fail to meet the NSSP criteria for certified shellfish growing areas (TABLE 4) . Stations #6 and #7A are currently uncertified for shellfish harvesting throughout the year. Stations #8, #8A and #9 are currently uncertified for the May 1st through December 14th period of the year and station #7B is in the certified portion of Great Peconic Bay. The NSSP statistical analysis shows that station #9B fails the TC criteria and marginally passes the FC criteria for year-round certified shellfish lands. Conversely, station #9C fails the FC criteria and marginally passes the TC criteria for year-round certified shellfish lands. Stations #9B and #9C continue to fail the criteria for certified shellfish lands during the May through November period. Both #9B and #9C are currently seasonally uncertified to shellfish harvesting-from May 1st through December 14th. It should be noted that sampling stations #9A and #10A continue to marginally pass the NSSP criteria for certified shellfish growing areas. A continued degradation of water quality at these sampling stations will require a change in their growing area classification. Seasonal Area Analysis: A seasonal analysis of the stations which fail the 6 certified growing area criteria demonstrates that all meet the criteria for the November through May certified (open) period except station 17A (TABLE 5) . VI. CONCLUSIONS AND GROWING AREA RECOMMENDATIONS: The water quality of the Great Peconic Bay SGA has remained relatively consistent since the last analysis in 1991, with one exception. This report recommends a change in classification for 9 acres of Great Peconic Bay adjacent to the mouth of Brushs Creek. Station #7A fails the NSSP criteria for certified shellfish lands and should remain uncertified year-round for the harvest of shellfish. Sampling station #7B now fails the year-round criteria for certified growing areas but meets the criteria for the November through May period. It is recommended that a year-round closure be established extending 500 feet from the entrance to Brushs Creek (FIGURE 5) . Water quality will be monitored at sampling stations #7A and 17B to check on the proposed closure. This proposed closure will reclassify approximately 9 acres of certified shellfish lands as uncertified year-round. Water quality at sampling station #6 (East Creek) continues to fail the NSSP criteria for certified shellfish lands. During the cold weather months of the year water quality improves in East Creek. A Conditional Shellfish Harvesting Program has been operated in East Creek for the December through April period of 1992/93 and 1993/94 . This program allows the harvesting of shellfish from this uncertified area under restricted rainfall conditions (APPENDI% 1) . Additional sampling stations have been established to monitor East Creek (FIGURE 4) . If a consistent trend in water quality improvement is demonstrated, the area may be upgraded to seasonal certification status. Bacteriological water quality at stations #8, #8A and #9 continues to fail the year-round NSSP criteria for certified growing areas but meets the criteria during the November through May period (TABLE 5) . It is recommended that these stations retain their current classification as seasonally certified from May 1st through December 14th, annually. Stations #9B and #9C, which are currently seasonally uncertified from May 1st through December 14th, now marginally satisfy the criteria for certified shellfish 7 lands. Station 19C is located within Deep Hole Creek. The station at the mouth of the Creek (19) continues to fail the year-round certified criteria for shellfish lands. It is recommended that stations 19B and 19C remain seasonally certified until a trend in water quality improvement can be documented demonstrating that the creeks should be reclassified as certified for the harvest of shellfish. Water quality at sampling stations #9A and #10A continue to marginally meet the NESP criteria for certified shellfish growing areas. The degradation of water quality at these stations was also noted in the last evaluation of the growing area ("Review of 1988 - 1991 Water Quality Data, Great Peconic Bay Shellfish Growing Area #2811) A continuation of the water quality degradation may require a downgrading in classification for this growing area. The remaining sampling stations in the certified portion of Great Peconic Bay meet the NESP criteria for certified shellfish growing areas and should remain open for the harvest of shellfish. Bacteriological water quality for the Great Peconic Bay Shellfish Growing Area will continue to be routinely monitored throughout the year. The area recommended for reclassification and areas which marginally satisfy the certified growing area criteria will be monitored for water quality improvement or degradation which may necessitate subsequent action. Supplemental changes in growing area classification will be addressed in future water quality evaluation reports. PREPARED BY: Christopher J. LaPorta Marine Resources Specialist April 1994 28WQ.94 8 TABLE 1: SHELLFISH GROWING AREA CLASSIFICATION OF THE GREAT PECONIC BAY SGA TRIBUTARIES. NAME OF TRIBUTARY SHELLFISH GROWING AREA CLASSIFICATION Brushs Creek Uncertified Cold Spring Pond Seasonally Uncertified: Shellfish Growing Area 162 May 15 through October 15 Deep Hole Creek Seasonally Uncertified: April 1 through December 14 Downs Creek Certified East Creek Uncertified Halls Creek Seasonally Uncertified: April 1 through December 14 Hortons Creek Certified James Creek Seasonally Uncertified: April 1 through December 14 Red Creek Pond Certified Sebonac Creek Seasonally Uncertified: Shellfish Growing Area 161 May 1 through November 30 Shinnecock Canal Uncertified Shellfish Growing Area #10 Squires Pond Certified West Creek Certified 9 TABLE 2A - Great Peconic Bay Total Coliform Water Qual>`ty Data 1990 - 1993 Record# DATE TC_1 TC 1A TC_2 TC_4 TC-4A TC 6 TC 6A TC-7A TC-78 TC-7C TC-8 TC-SA TC-9 TC 9A TC-98 TC 9C TC 90 TC-10 TC-10A TC-108 TC_11 TC-15 TC-15A TC 16 TC-16A TC 21 TC 17 TC 18 1 01/25/90 2.9 2.9 2- 9.0 9.0 75.0 15.0 15.0 23.0 4,0 9.0 9.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2 05/17/90 2.9 2.9 15.0 4.0 23.0 23.0 9.0 460.0 15.0 23.0 93.0 240.0 1100.0 2.9 460.0 150.0 0.0 2.9 460.0 23.0 2.9 1100.0 460.0 2.9 93.0 2.9 3 06/20/90 2.9 2.9 43.0 23.0 9.0 4.0 23.0 240.0 460.0 43.0 460.0 150.0 93.0 2.9 43.0 150.0 0.0 2.9 15.0 0.0 4.0 23.0 .0 2.9 4.0 2.9 4 4 07/03/90 2.9 4.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 240.0 23.0 1100.0 43.0 23.0 43.0 75.0 43.0 4.0 9.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 23.0 14.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 .0 2 5 07/13/90 43.0 7.0 43.0 2.9 240.0 2501.0 2.9 2501.0 9.0 7.0 1100.0 2501.0 460.0 1100.0 93.0 1100.0 240.0 2.9 240.0 93.0 2.9 23.0 150.0 4.0 43.0 2.9 6 07/17/90 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 43.0 2.9 2.9 150.0 93.0 43.0 39.0 93.0 23.0 43.0 43.0 240.0 4.0 2.9 9.0 11.0 2_9 2.9 23.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 7 09/17/90 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 23.0 460.0 2.9 1100.0 460.0 2.9 240.0 93.0 43.0 6.2 23.0 29.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 8 09/18/90 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 3.0 150.0 4.0 9.0 43.0 93.0 23.0 4.0 4.0 43.0 23.0 4.0 15.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 09/27/90 2.9 2.9 9.0 9.0 43.0 460.0 2.9 2501.0 240.0 4.0 240.0 240.0 43.0 7.0 150.0 240.0 23.0 2.9 43.0 39.0 2.9 150.0 43.0 4.0 93.0 2.9 10 12/11/90 43.0 43.0 3.0 7.0 23.0 7.0 23.0 93.0 93.0 2.9 9.0 9.0 23.0 7.0 4.0 23.0 4.0 15.0 93.0 43.0 4.0 9.0 2.9 4.0 4.0 9.0 11 01/10/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 240.0 7.0 23.0 240.0 460.0 460.0 1100.0 2501.0 9.0 2.9 150.0 43.0 23.0 15.0 93.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 02/08/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.0 0.0 93.0 15.0 2.9 15.0 15.0 23.0 2.9 43.0 15.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 03/13/91 3.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 21.0 2.9 4.0 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 7.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 14 03/22/91 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 23.0 15.0 93.0 9.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 43.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 9.0 9.0 43.0 21.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 15 03/25/91 3.0 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 43.0 9.0 23.0 43.0 4.0 9.0 93.0 15.0 9.0 4.0 2.9 15.0 2.9 3.0 9.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 9.0 16 04/23/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 240.0 0.0 9.0 23.0 0.0 4.0 21.0 2501.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 93.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 04/24/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 05/03/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 240.0 93.0 4.0 4.0 6.2 9.0 43.0 2.9 3.d 2.9 2.9 43.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 05/07/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 93.0 240.0 2.9 240.0 93.0 23.0 9.0 9.0 21.0 93.0 3.0 15.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 20 05/09/91 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 9.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 20.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 21 06/06/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 23.0 11.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 06/13/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 2.9 460.0 43.0 9.0 460.0 1100.0 43.0 23.0 43.0 93.0 15.0 4.0 43.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 23 06/20/91 2.9 2.9 23.0 7.0 93.0 93.0 75.0 2501,0 1100.0 7.0 240.0 460.0 150.0 43.0 93.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 7.0 43.0 2.9 43.0 9.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 24 07/08/91 2.9 2.9 43.0 3.0 240.0 240.0 23.0 460.0 460.0 23.0 460.0 2501.0 43.0 43.0 460.0 240.0 23.0 9.0 23.0 240.0 2.9 9.0 23.0 23.0 43.0 2.9 25 07/18/91 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 460.0 93.0 2.9 23.0 23.0 23.0 4.0 15.0 23.0 43.0 2.9 23.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 08/20/91 0.0 460.0 240.0 0.0 1100.0 2501.0 0.0 2501.0 0.0 460.0 1100.0 0.0 2501.0 1100.0 2501.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 2501.0 C.0 93.0 0.0 2501.0 0.0 2501.0 150.0 27 11/13/91 43.0 43.0 4.0 93.0 43.0 43.0 93.0 460.0 93.0 2.9 93.0 75.0 460.0 23.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 23.0 460.0 2501.0 23.0 240.0 43.0 11.0 21.0 23.0 28 05/11/92 ' 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 75.0 2.9 4.0 9.0 7.0 15.0 2.9 9.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 15.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 29 07/09/92 43.0 2.9 43.0 4.0 15.0 4.0 2.9 1100.0 2.9 210.0 460.0 93.0 93.0 43.0 93.0 23.0 2.9 4.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 9.0 2.9 15.0 2.9 30 08/11/92 2.9 4.0 9.0 2.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 93.0 4.0 3.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 4.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 43.0 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 31 09/08/92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.0 0.0 2501.0 2.9 4,0 9.0 240.0 75.0 240.0 240.0 93.0 2.9 4.0 460.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32 11/05/92 9.0 4.0 43.0 15.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 150.0 43.0 4.0 240.0 43.0 240.0 4.0 39.0 43.0 9.0 9.0 93.0 43.0 2.9 9.0 15.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 33 12/15/92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.0 0.0 150.0 240.0 1100.0 240.0 1100.0 1100.0 2501.0 1100.0 2501.0 150.0 93.0 2501.0 C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 _ 34 12/18/92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.0 0.0 240.0 460.0 93.0 240.0 75.0 93.0 1100.0 2501.0 0.0 93.0 43.0 1100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 03/30/93 2.9 4.0 93.0 15.0 23.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 43.0 23.0 4.0 15.0 43.0 9.0 2.9 43.0 240.0 4.0 23.0 43.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 36 04/28/93 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 4.0 23.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 21.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 4.0 23.0 9.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 43.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 37 07/28/93 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 240.0 3.0 460.0 23.0 460.0 2501.0 1100.0 2501.0 4.0 43.0 240.0 1100.0 4.0 240.0 240.0 2.9 9.0 23.0 2.9 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 38 09/22/93 0.0 0.0 150.0 43.0 1100.0 2501.0 21.0 2501.0 240.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 39 09/23/93 4.0 4.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 2.9 93.0 1100.0 1100.0 93.0 75.0 240.0 1100.0 460.0 210.0 1100.0 43.0 43.0 240.0 460.0 2.9 7.0 150.0 9.0 9.0 23.0 9.0 9.0 40 10/14/93 2.9 15.0 43.0 93.0 23.0 43.0 4.0 75.0 240.0 23.0 2.9 240.0 2501.0 240.0 460.0 240.0 4.0 4.0 43.0 23.0 4.0 4.0 43.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 41 12/01/93 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 23.0 75.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 93.0 23.0 7.0 240.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 23.0 43.0 1 9.1 e �dis TABLE 2B - Great Peconic Bay Fecal Coliform Water Qualil< Data 1990 - 1993 Record# DATE FC-1 FC-1A FC-2 FC-4 FC-4A FC-6 FC 6A FC-7A FC-76 FC-7C FC-8 FC SA FC-9 FC-9A., FC 96 FC 9C FC 9D FC-10 FC-10A FC 108 FC 11 FC 15 FC 15A FC 16 FC-16A FC 21 FC-17 FC 18 1 01/25/90 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 75.0 9.0 3.0 23.0 2.9 9.0 4.0 15.0 9.0 4.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 2.9 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2 05/17/90 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.9 23.0 23.0 4.0 460.0 7.0 4.0 23.0 43.0 93.0 2.9 39.0 43.0 0.0 2.9 93.0 23.0 2.9 93.0 23.0 2.9 15.0 2.9 3 06/20/90 2.9 2.9 23.0 4.0 9.0 4.0 23.0 93.0 93.0 9.0 460.0 93.0 93.0 2.9 23.0 43.0 0.0 2.9 15.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 4 07/03/99 2.9 4.0 23.0 9.0 9.0 15.0 23.0 460.0 43.0 4.0 23.0 75.0 43.0 4.0 9.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 14.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 5 07/13/90 4.0 2.9 43.0 2.9 93.0 75.0 2.9 2501.0 2.9 2.9 43.0 1100.0 460.0 150.0 23.0 1100.0 240.0 2.9 240.0 23.0 2.9 9.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 6 07/17/90 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 2.9 150.0 43.0 2.9 23.0 9.0 `23.0 15.0 43.0 93.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 7 09/17/90 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 4.0 15.0 2.9 460.0 150.0 2.9 93.0 93.0 23.0 3.0 4.0 15.0 2.9 9.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 8 09/18/9^ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 3.0 20.0 4.0 9.0 23.0 43.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9 O9/27/9C 2.9 2.9 4.0 9.0 43.0 43.0 2.9 1100.0 240.0 4.0 21.0 93.0 2.9 3.0 43.0 93.0 9.0 2.9 9.0 7.0 2.9 93.0 23.0 4.0 43.0 2.9 10 12/11/90 43.0 43.0 3.0 4.0 23.0 7.0 23.0 93.0 43.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 9.0 3.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 7.0 23.0 43.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 23.0 11 01/10/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 7.0 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 9.0 9.0 7.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 23.0 7.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 02/08/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 21.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 7.0 9.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 03/13/9' 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 7.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 14 03/22/9' 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 23.0 9.0 93.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 43.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 15.0 15.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 15 03/25/9' 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 9.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 7.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 4.0 2.9 16 04/23/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 2.9 23.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 93.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17 04/24/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 05/03/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 240.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 15.0 2.9 2:9 2.9 2.9 15.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 05/07/5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 93.0 240.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 23.0 4.0 9.0 15.0 2.9 2.9 15.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 20 05/09/9' 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 4.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 21 06/06/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 460.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 7.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 06/13/5" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.9 460.0 43.0 2.9 93.0 240.0 15.0 23.0 23.0 43.0 9.0 4.0 23.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 23 06/20/91 2.9 2.9 23.0 7.0 15.0 43.0 23.0 2501.0 460.0 4.0 240.0 93.0 150.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 7.0 43.0 2.9 23.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 24 07/08/9' 2.9 2.9 43.0 3.0 240.0 240.0 9.0 460.0 460.0 23.0 93.0 460.0 23.0 43.0 43.0 240.0 9.0 9.0 23.0 240.0 2.9 4.0 23.0 4.0 43.0 2.9 25 07/18/9' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 240.0 43.0 2.9 23.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 9.0 43.0 2.9 4.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26 08/20/9 0.0 75.0 4.0 0.0 93.0 460.0 0.0 1100.0 0.0 43.0 460.0 0.0 460.0 43.0 240.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 2501.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 460.0 0.0 75.0 39.0 27 11/13/5' 4.0 4.0 2.9 15.0 9.0 15.0 23.0 93.0 43.0 2.9 43.0 4.0 23.0 23.0 4.0 23.0 4.0 4.0 240.0 150.0 23.0 7.0 23.0 4.0 2.9 23.0 28 05/11/52 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 75.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 4.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 29 07/09/72 2.9 2.9 23.0 2.9 7.0 2.9 2.9 1100.0 2.9 210.0 43.0 43.0 21.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 4.0 2.9 15.0 2.9 30 08/11M 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 4.0 23.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 31 09/08/52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 1100.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 23.0 75.0 43.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 4.0 93.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32 11/05/72 2.9 2.9 4.0 9.0 3.0 23.0 4.0 75.0 23.0 4.0 9.0 43.0 15.0 2.9 14.0 23.0 4.0 4.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 4.0 3.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 33 12/05/92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 75.0 23.0 23.0 93.0 43.0 39.0 23.0 20.0 93.0 14.0 23.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 34 12/18/5'2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 43.0 23.0 23.0 4.0 23.0 4.0 43.0 9.0 0.0 9.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35 03/30/73 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 9.0 0.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 43.0 43.0 4.0 2.9 23.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 9.0 36 04/28 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 4.0 2.9 23.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 37 07/28/93 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 23.0 3.0 460.0 23.0 23.0 460.0 150.0 150.0 4.0 43.0 240.0 23.0 2.9 23.0 43.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 7.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 38 09/22/73 0.0 0.0 43.0 15.0 150.0 2501.0 11.0 2501.0 43.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 39 09/23M 2.9 4.0 43.0 43.0 23.0 2.9 23.0 1100.0 150.0 43.0 4.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 150.0 75.0 23.0 43.0 23.0 93.0 2.9 7.0 93.0 4.0 9.0 23.0 4.0 4.0 40 10/14/73 2.9 9.0 23.0 2.9 23.0 3.0 4.0 75.0 240.0 23.0 2.9 43.0 1100.0 240.0 460.0 93.0 4.0 2.9 9.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 9.0 2.9 9.0 23.0 2.9 2.9 41 12/01/53 2.9 2.9 4.0 2.9 2.9 23.0 23.0 9.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 93.0 7.0 43.0. 3.0 11.0 4.0 7.0 23.0 0.0 9.0 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 4.0 9.0 43.0 zl l-efJ' 9A TABLE 3 - Great Peconic Bay 1990 - 1993 Environmental Database Record# DATE TIDE RO24 R24 48 R4872 R7296 APC WINDIR WINDVEL 1 01/25/90 EBB 07 10 0. 10 0.00 0. 15 NO 0 2 05/17/90 LE 1.25 .0.00 0.00 0.25 YES* ESE 15 3 06/20/90 HE 0.00 0.25 0.00 0. 00 YES 0 4 07/03/90 EBB 0.00 0.75 0.75 1. 00 YES 0 5 07/13/90 ME 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 05 YES 0 6 07/17/90 ME 0. 00 0. 00 0.05 0. 00 NO 0 7 09/17/90 HE 0. 30 0. 00 0.50 0.00 YES* WNW 20 8 09/18/90 HE 0. 00 0.30 0.00 0.50 YES* WNW 20 9 09/27/90 ME 0. 50 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 YES 0 10 12/11/90 ME-LE 0. 00 0. 00 0.15 0.23 YES* NW 13 11 01/10/91 ME-LE 0. 80 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 YES* NW 20 12 02/08/91 ME-LE 0. 25 0. 11 0. 00 0.00 YES* VAR. 0 13 03/13/91 HE-ME 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 NO WNW 12 14 03/22/91 LE 0. 00 0. 00 0. 15 0. 50 YES ENE 12 15 03/25/91 HE 0. 10 0. 35 0.00 0. 00 YES ESE 8 16 04/23/91 ME-LE 0. 10 0. 40 1.00 0. 00 YES SW 10 17 04/24/91 HE 0. 00 0. 10 0.40 1. 00 YES S 5 18 05/03/91 LE 0. 00 0. 35 0.50 0.25 YES NW 18 19 05/07/91 ME 0. 35 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 YES WNW 18 20 05/09/91 LE-LS 0. 00 0. 00 0.35 0. 00 YES 0 21 06/06/91 ME 0.20 0. 00 0.80 0. 00 YES 0 22 06/13/91 HE 0. 40 0.50 0.00 0. 00 YES NW 20 23 06/20/91 ME 0. 25 0. 10 0. 00 0. 00 YES W 8 24 07/08/91 HE 0. 15 0. 10 0.25 0. 00 YES SW 10 25 07/18/91 LE 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 NO SW 10 26 08/20/91 ME 2 . 95 1.90 0. 00 10. 00 YES* 0 27 11/13/91 LE 0. 00 0. 12 0.40 0. 00 YES NNW 12 28 05/11/92 HE 0. 10 0. 00 0.80 0. 00 YES ENE 15 29 07/09/92 HE 0. 30 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 YES W 10 30 08/11/92 ME 0. 00 0. 80 0.40 0. 00 YES SW 12 31 09/08/92 ME 0. 42 0. 01 0.00 10. 00 XS 0 32 11/05/92 HE 0. 00 0. 03 1. 02 0. 00 YES NE 12 33 12/15/92 FL 10. 00 0. 00 0. 20 2 . 00 XS 0 34 12/18/92 LE 0. 80 0_20 0.00 0. 00 YES 0 35 03/30/93 LE-LF 0. 00 0. 00 0-:40 0. 00 YES NNE 7 36 04/28/93 ME-LE 0. 00 0. 60 0. 00 0. 00 YES E 13 37 07/28/93 HE 1. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 YES VAR 0 38 09/22/93 ME 3 . 50 0. 20 10. 00 0. 20 XS* NE 13 39 09/23/93 ME 0. 00 3 . 50 0.20 10. 00 XS* 0 40 10/14/93 HE 0. 00 1. 25 0. 00 0. 00 YES 0 41 12/01/93 HS-HE 0. 00 0. 00 1. 70 0. 00 YES 0 TABLE 4 - Great Peconic Bay Year-Round APC Water Quality Data Analysis DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 Min= 0.25 Max- 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerg- 10.00 STATION N MEDIAN ; > 330 STATION N MEDIAN ; > 49 TC 1 4 3.0 0.0 FC 1 4 2.9 0.0 TC-lA 4 2.9 0.0 FC_lA 4 2.9 0.0 TC 2 4 3.0 0.0 FC_2 4 3.0 0.0 TC 4 4 5.5 0.0 FC 4A 4 13.0 0.0 TC-6 5 7.0 0.0 TC 4 16.0 0.0 F 6 5 7.0 20.0 6 TC 6A 4 9.5 0.0 C7A 5 93.0 60.0 6A 4 6.0 0.0 C FC C T7A 5 93.0 20.0 FC7B 5 43.0 0.0 TC 7C TC 7C 5 4.0 0.0 5 97.0 0.0 FC 7C 5 2.9 0.0 FC 8 5 9.0 0.0 TC 8 5 9.0 0.0 FC 8A 5 4.0 0.0 TC 8A 5 9.0 0.0 FC 5 9.0 0.0 TC 9 5 27.0 0.0 FC 9A 5 3.0 0.0 T,C 9A 5 7.0 0.0 FC 9B 5 4.0 0.0 TC 9CC 5 27.0 0.0 TC 9 5 9.0 0.0 FC-9c 5 27.0 20.0 TC 9D 4 4.0 0.0 FC 9D 4 2.9 0.0 C TC 10 5 2.9 0.0 F10 5 2.9 0.0 TC-10A 5 9.0 0.0 FC-10A 5 4.0 0.0 TC 10B 4 17.0 0.0 FC_108 4 8.0 0.0 TC 11 4 3.5 0.0 FC 11 4 2.9 0.0 TC-15 4 8.0 0.0 FC--15 4 3.5 0.0 TC 15A 4 3.5 0.0 FC 15A 4 2.9 0.0 TC C 16 4 2.9 0.0 F16 4 2.9 0.0 TC 16A 4 4.0 0.0 FC_16A 4 3.5 0.0 TC-21 4 3.0 0.0 FC-21 4 3.0 0.0 MODERATE RAIN AREA NO. - 28 MODERATE RAIN AREA NO. - 28 Min= 0.25 Max- 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max- 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 STATION N MEDIAN } > 330 STATION N MEDIAN ; > 49 TC 1 20 2.9 0.0 FC 1 20 2.9 0.0 TC C lA 20 2.9 0.0 FlA 20 2.9 0.0 TC 2 20 12.0 0.0 FC 2 20 4.0 0.0 C C T 4 21 4.0 0.0 F4 21 2.9 0.0 TC 4A 21 23.0 0.0 FC_4A 21 7.0 9.5 TC 6 27 43.0 11.1 FC 6 27 15.0 7.4 TC 6A 23 4.0 0.0 FC 6A 23 4.0 0.0 TC 77A 7A 70 240.0 40.0 FC 7A 30 93.0 63.3 TC C 78 28 43.0 17.9 F7B 28 15.0 25.0 TC 7C 29 4.0 3.4 FC 7C 29 4.0 3.4 TC B 29 43.0 20.7 FC_8 29 9.0 20.7 TC 8A 28 93.0 17.9 FC_8A 28 43.0 35.7 TC 9 30 43.0 20.0 FC 9 30 15.0 20.0 TC 9A 30 - 9.0 10:'0 FC'9A 30 4.0 6.7 TC 9B 29 43.0 20.7 FC 9H 29 9.0 6.9 TC 9C 29 43.0 6.9 FC 9C 29 23.0 17.2 TC 9D 26 12.0 .3.8 FC 9D 26 4.0 3.8 TC 10 28 3.0 0.0 FC 10 28 2.9 0.0 TC 10A 30 73.0 10.0 FC 10A 30 15.0 10.0 TC 10B 25 27.0 4.0 FC 10B 25 14.0 8.0 TC C ll 22 2.9 0.0 F11 22 2.9 0.0 C C T 15 21 9.0 4.8 F 15 21 4.0 9.5 TC 15A 21 20.0 4.8 FC 15A 21 9.0 0.0 TC C 16 20 3.0 0.0 F 16 20 2.9 0.0 TC 16A 20 5.5 0.0 FC 16A 20 4.0 .0.0 TC C 21 23 2.9 0.0 F 21 23 2.9 0.0 TC 17 6 3.5 0.0 FC 17 5 2.9 0.0 TC-18 6 3.5 0.0 FC-18 5 2.9 0.0 EXCESS RAIN AREA NO. 28 EXCESS RAIN AREA NO. - 28 Min- 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max- 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 > 49 STATION N MEDIAN ; > 330 STATION N MEDIAN ; TC 1 1 4.0 0.0 FC_1 1 2.9 0.0 TlA 2 232.0 50.0 FC_7A 2 79.5 50.0 C TABLE 5 Great Peconic Bay 1990 - 1993 APC Water Quality Data Analys- November to May Period DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 MTATION.25 Max= 2.99 Emerq= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerq= 10.00 MEDIAN $ > 330 STATION N IAN $ TC 6 3 7.0 0.0 > gc TC 7A 3 21.0 0.0 FC 6 3 7.0 33.3 TC 7B 3 FC-7A 3 3.0 33.3 23.0 0.0 FC 7B 3 23.0 0.0 TC-3 3 9.0 0.0 FC-8 3 4.0 0.0 TC-8A 3 9.0 0.0 FC-8A 3 2.9 0.0 TC 9 3 15.0 0.0 FC-9 TC 9B 3 3 9.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 FC 9B 3 2.9 0.0 TC-9C 3 23.0 0.0 FC 9C 3 _ 23.0 0.0 MODERATE RAIN AREA NO. = 28 MODERATE RAIN AREA NO. = 28 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerq= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerq= 10.0C STATION N MEDIAN $ > 330 STATION N M70-AN $ > TC 6 14 23.0 0.0 FC 6 14 12.0 0.0 TC-7A 16 93.0 12.5 FC-7A 16 33.0 43.8 TC-7B 15 15.0 5.7 FC 7B 15 2.9 6.7 TC-8 16 22.0 0.0 FC-8 16 4.J 0.0 TC 8A 15 43.0 0.0 FC-8A 15 4.0 6.7 TC 9 16 23.0 13.8 FC-9 16 4.J 6.3 TC 9B 15 39.0 25.7 FC-9B 15 4.J 6.7 .C-9c 15 21.0 6.7 FC-9C 15 4.3 0.0 LXCESS RAIN AREA NO. = 28 EXCESS RAIN AREA NO. = 23 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emery= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerq= 10.00 STATION N MEDIAN $ > 330 STATION N MF--,rA 1 TC 6 1 $ > TC-7A 460.0 100.0 FC_6 1 23.- 0.0 1 150.0 TC 7$ 1 240.0 0'0 FC 7B 1 23.9 100.0 TC-3 0.0 1 23.0 0.0 1 1 240.0 0.0 FC-8 1 93.0 TC_9a 1100.0 100.0 FC_8A 1 43.0 100.0 0.0 1 1100.0 100.0 FC 9 1 39.0 0.0 TC 9C 1 1100.0 100.0 FC-9B 1 20.0 0.0 1 2501.0 100.0 FC-9C 1 93.3 100.0 TABLE 6 Great Peconic Bay 1990 -1993 APC Water Quality Data Analys- May to November Period DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 DRY DATA AREA NO. = 28 Min= 0.25 Max-- 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 STATION N MEDI.�V $ > 330 STATION N MEDIAN $ > C. TC_6 2 13.0 0.0 FC 6 2 6.0 0.0 393.0 05.0 50.0 FC_7A 2 195.0 100.0 TC 7B 2 TC-8 0.0 FC_73 2 43.0 0.0 2 31.0 0.0 FC d 2 23.0 0.0 TC 2 58.0 0.0 FC 9A 2 8A _ 16.0 0.0 TC 9 TC 93 2 29.0 0.0 FC 93 2 23.5 0.0 TC-9C 2 131.5 0.0 FC-9C 2 51.0 50.0 MODERATE RAIN AREA NO. = 28 MODLxAT-z RAIN AREA NO. = 28 Min= 0.25 Max-- 2.99 E�nerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 STATION N MEDIAN $ >330 STATION N MEDIAN $ > 4; TC 6 19 43.0 i5.8 FC_6 19 15.0 10.5 TC_7A 20 460.0 60.0 FC 7A 20 460.0 90.0 TC_73 19 43.0 21.1 FC 73 19 43.0 36.8 TC_a 19 240.0 31.6 FC 8 19 23.0 31.6 TC aA 19 93.0 26.3 FC 2A 19 43.0 47.4 TC_9 20 43.0 27.0 FC_9 20 23.0 30.0 TC 98 20 43.0 15.0 FC 95 20 14.5 5.0 TC-9C 20 43.0 5,0 FC-9C 20 33.0 25.0 .YC7SS RAIN ARE-3 NO. = 28 EXC_'�S RAIN 2.RZ- NO. = 28 Win= 0.25 Max= 2.99 Emerg= 10.00 Min= 0.25 M_ax= 2.99 Emery= 10.00 STATIONN M_-DIa.Y $ > STATION N MED IAN $ >1 330FC 5 4 233.5 50.0 TC 6 4 1297.0 50.0 TC-7A 4 2501.0 100.0 FC-71 4 1100.0 100.0 TC 7B 3 240.0 33.3 FC 73 3 43.0 33.3 TC C 3 3 75.0 33.3 F8 3 4.0 33.3 TC-8A 2 240.0 0.0 FC--8A. 2 33.0 0.0 TC3 3 1100.0 66.7 FC_9 3 75.0 66.7 Tr-9B 3 240.0 33.3 FC-53 3 150.0 66.7 rC_9C 2 596.5 50.0 FC-9C 2 39.5 50.0 FIGURE 1: Great Peconic -Bay Shellfish Growing Area #28 NI? I'Y YQRI<Is iViAI�INL AND YO �,ss Y� COASTAL CONN ,.A DISTPIC`I' GREAT PECONIC BAY -- — SHELLFISH GROWING AREA #28 WESTCliESTER CONN. CONN. \ , _ - - N.Y. wESTEr7" N Y. V L.I.S.BRONX LONG ISLAND SOUN ) .s 1 ♦ ' 1�1 NTH OYSTER OR S HEMP. BAY i SMITIJJOW. RIVEIMEAO ✓ -/� j,w,,le '•� OUEENS ! URUOKIIAVEN 011001<1 YNi ` )HAMPTON J SfAILN I SOUTIIAM13[ON I`..I.Ari? VAS BABYLON ISLIP n 1� /I/ LC..ix —r-� \ o., �a 11EMPSTEAO i [i` Ir ( r. -^ STATE OF 11EM YORY. DEPARTN(ENT OF r (I v GREAT SOUTII 0MY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION --- - N Y. L" 7Q 'r' , •• _ ), �-- HARINE AND COASTAL U15T•RIcE VL T ATLANTIC OCEAN J'o 7 51, tv T irt F--d 11-D *91 -7, 5 V-k I Oet 4-0 F91 Jr. .0 G Ll 0 E- 467: Swim S TU I laums I L Pnyjal ell kvS 3t=ad leaj ajnTjJ c". Is 41b rVIO FIGURE 4 East Creek Conditional Progrartr Water Quality Sampling Stations. a N —tel ¢EO 0 �o g A� E � �0 6 0 �5 0� 0 a N -- Boat PublicM •na • ��:. 0 STREET Beach G� 'r � � m 9� '• 3RD • n St ~ 1. Sr y ---{ to �•�. vt� Great Peconic BayFIGS 11 t rl 1„ N/' ; ""' 1). �� �,,,,,,,� Shellfish Growing Area 028 �' Area Recommended for Reclassificatic Pio .\\.I1 p • \ arushs Creek Mouth (9 Acres) ' \ •� `• ' gip,•. '1 T•r•1• i'' •\•' 11.1\., \ 1` "Z . / ,, ' \ ,• II No 2 ulloY \o \\ \ 4539 � `yS , � ..• 1.1 lb"111,1 Hem 11 • Immaculate /a e 13 ••C.\ , I"38 el 16 lb y IM Sia W IV Hatched Area will be / ` Reclassified - ~ - 4, 536 3rown5 ao Polnl /e APPENDIX 1 - East Creek Com onal Shellfish Harvesting Program Notice to Hai ters STATE f5F NEN YORK PRIOR TO HARVESTING IN TUB CONDITION AREA, IT II�TBL RESPONSIBILITY O DEPARTMENT O1 LNVIRONMBUTAL CONSERVATION Till-DARY6axcH TO DETERMINE WIIETIIER CONDITION STATUS ANNOUNCEMENT BJvS BEE_ BUILDING /40 SUNY CAMPUS MADE POR THAT DAY. UNTIL TUB "OPEN" ANNOUNCLMBNT LAS BEEN MADE, VIA THE STONY BROOK, NEN YORK 11790 ADOVB MENTIONED PROCEDURES, TUB AREA REMAINS QNCEATIFIED. HARVESTING MAY NOTICE TO ALL SHELLFISH HAAVBSTERS IN TIIE TOWN OP RIVERHEAD NOT BEGIN BEFORE SUNRISE. "CORD ITIDNA? BHIILLLIS9ING PROGRAM" FOR � T Cjlp 1� PAOCIU►U DU QIP Pursuant to the provisions of Title 47.3 (b), the New York State This program will operate from January 19 through April 13, 1994 (bo Department of Environmental Conservation in cooperation with the Town of dates inclusive) . Riverhead will initiate a "COUDITIONAL BR A@L B�AI PA00[�fj_' on ',� SPECIAL NOTII�y January 19. 1994 for a portion of tits uncertified sllelllisll lands !n East Creek, South Jamesport. (a) Any problem with the Riverhead Sewage Treatment plant way resul In order to take advantage of the program please note the following: In the immediate suspension of harvesting in the Bast Creek Conditional area, if the area is "OPEN", until it can be LL {,ONDITIONAL AREA DESCRIPTION fOjeass note EZCEPTIOHAJ1 determined through bacteriological testing that the water quell meets the certified area criteria. If the harvesting area is All of the uncertified ettall[lslt lends in East Creek as descrlhed !r: "CLOSED" when the problem occurs, the opening nay be delayed the NOTICE TQ�LL 5)IELLFISII_UdBYE�TEIiSr NOTICE OF THE CONDITION OF AIA, until water quality is determined to be acceptable. SIIELLFISII LANDS WITIIIH OR ADJACENT TO THE TOWN OF RIVERIIEAD, CUUII'1'Y OF' SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEW YORK, Thomas C. Jorling, Commissioner of (b) Addltlonal Information about the operation of the East Creek Environmental Conservation, By: Arthur J. Newell, Assistant Director, conditional program is available from the Town of Riverhead by Division of Marine Resources, dated: January 1, 1994, Stony Brook, trey calling 23L-�;4.4_9XL90f11QD_;Q2 between tl:e hours of 6:70 AM and York. 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday. EXC PTt all Of that area north of a line across the opening (c) The map contained In title "NOTICE" is to be used for jpj2rjNsjQ (creek mouth) along the northernmost shore of East Creek; Qllllf• If you have any questions please contact the NYSOEC Sure. and, of Shelltisheries at 444-0475 between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:45 PM, Monday through Friday. EXCEPT: all that area of the East Creek Marina boat docking facility. (d) 11119 cgliQiT74tl)1�@HEIeLLi�II HAAVE flT PAOGRAM'� MAY LE AyyIBED, B�l3YFHB1+42-QHS231ililil�Tli12_LT_D1i�T1tlB IF THE BACTERIO O(ITCAt. ■a•rv;_ j, CONDITIONS TO BE MET: 09AL1TY DO E_8 NOf MEET THE 1TAj{DARDB FOR CERTIFIED DHEIyirIgs 9I141111(2LIl1±QB, or. IF ANY OT$EA CONDITION OA EVENT OCCURS 11HisA When no more than 0.75 inches of liquid precipitation is recorded for KAY B E A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEA TH each of seven successive days the area may be "opened" (certified) for harvesting on the eighth day and remain "open" until more than 0.35 inches of rain Is recorded within a 24 hour period. Dated: January 12, 1994 Arthur J. Newell IL DAILY PUBLIC NOTIFICATZONi Stony Brook, New York Assistant Director Division o[ Marine Resources Daily, early each morning, radio stOfithe conditional (iona AM) and Weit \\ (1600 AH) will announce the ■feta• of+the conditional area as either -�- "OPEN" or "CLOSED" for that day, C � i n A telephone message gluing the dally status of the conditional harvest r � s' area can be accessed with a touch tone telephone by dialing Town Ilall No at 727-3200, o A copy of the order designating the area as 110PEU11 or "CLOSED" will lie Fit P posted in the HYSUEC Regional Office in Stony Brook, New York. 1 GOAT RAMP 0 O 1i0TE: A1.1 `hatched" areas 10 remain UNCERTIFIED. east stnrtr '' ST CREEK 1999 CONOITIWIAL c IIELLFI 11 I VIIKT 1 R rid 2 1 i i a �/•. A � N NrV :s fr rT �•'�r • it rr• lUlc tAp Ic raj g(rrUlt APPENDIX 5 FLORAL INVENTORY AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION BY: ERIC LAMONT, Ph.D. JULY 1995 FLORAL INVENTORY AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION: INDIAN SHORES AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: PECONIC LAND TRUST 30 JAGGER LANE P.O. BOX 2088 SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11968 PREPARED BY: ERIC LAMONT, PH.D. BOTANICAL CONSULTANT 717 SOUND SHORE ROAD RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 JULY 1995 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................3 DISCUSSION OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE OAK-HICKORY FOREST...................................................................4 SUCCESSIONAL SOUTHERN HARDWOOD FOREST..........................5 MARITIME OAK BARRENS...............................................................6 SALT SHRUB COMMUNITY...............................................................8 COASTAL SALT MARSH..................................................................9 PHRAGMITES REED MARSH.............................................................9 RAREPLANTS........................................................................................11 LITERATURE CITED...............................................................................12 - 2 - INTRODUCTION The purpose of this vegetation report is to describe the plant communities and dominant plant species at Indian Shores Subdivision located at Cutchogue in the Township of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Site inspections of the property were conducted on 17 June 1995 and 9 July 1995. The descriptions of the plant communities in this report are based upon the classification system of Reschke (1990), Ecological Communities of New York State, and nomenclature (the scientific names of plants) follows Mitchell (1986), A Checklist of New York State Plants. Six distinct ecological communities occur at this property. The forested uplands consist of three types: the southern portion of the property is dominated by a relatively undisturbed and native oak-hickory forest; the northern portion of the property consists of a highly disturbed successional forest dominated by non-native trees and shrubs; the vegetation occurring at the former Fort Cutchogue site is unique and can best be described as maritime oak barrens, this community contains many plant species characteristic of the maritime grasslands located on the South Fork of eastern Long Island. The eastern portion of the property consists of a salt marsh community, and a salt shrub community occurs in the transition zone between forested uplands-and--salt-marsh. --THe--nerth- end of Downs Creek has been invaded by the agressive and non-native Phragmites Reed which has displaced much of the native flora. Although two species of rare plants have been reported from the Cutchogue area by New York Natural Heritage Program, no rare plants were located on the proposed development site during the site inspections. - 3 - DISCUSSION OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 1. Oak-hickory/ Forest The oak-hickory forest located at the south end of the property (see vegetation map) is relatively undisturbed and is dominated by native species of trees and shrubs. Although historically the forest had been lumbered, there is no indication that the land has been historically plowed and cultivated for farming; as a result, the forest has naturally regenerated itself and is not significantly different in structure and composition from the time of early European settlement and colonization. Increasingly fewer remnants of native forest remain in the Township of Southold. The oak-hickory forest on site is dominated by the following tree species: black oak (Quercus velutina), white oak (Quercus alba), and scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea); mixed with the oaks at lower densities are pignut hickory (Caryla -Iq abra) and mockemut hickory (Carya tomentosa). Several groves of American beech (Fagus grandifolia) occur throughout the forest and scattered individuals of American holly (Ilex opaca) also occur, an indicator of the maritime influence upon this area. There is a subcanopy layer of small trees and tall shrubs including flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) and juneberry (Amelanchier canadensis). Two common low shrubs are maple-leaf vibumum (Viburnum acerifolium) and low bush blueberry (Vaccinium 1allidum); wild black cherry (Prunus serotina) seedlings are common in the understory but few mature adult individuals occur within the forest. The groundlayer is composed of sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis), spotted wintergreen (Chimophila - 4 - maculata), pink lady-slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule), and beech-drops (Epifagus virginiana) occur under American beech trees. Common vines in the forest include virginia creeper (Parthenocissis guinquefolia) and round-leaf catbrier (Smilax rotundifolia). 2. Successional Southern Hardwood Forest The land at the north end of the property (see vegetation map) had been historically cleared or otherwise disturbed in the past, and the soils have been significantly disturbed. The forest that now occurs at this location is dominated by non-native, introduced species of trees and shrubs that are well-adapted to establishment following disturbance. A characteristic feature of successional forests is the lack of reproduction of the canopy species. The successional forest on site is dominated by two non-native trees: black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and Norway maple (Acer platanoides). The understory is also dominated by non-native species of vines, bramble, and shrubs: oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculata), wineberry (Rubus phoenicoIasi us), multiflower rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese barberry (Berberis thunberaii), and Morrow's honeysuckle (Lonicera morrowii). Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) is also common in the understory. Scattered individuals of black cherry (Prunus serotina) occur, and a few oak and hickory trees can still be found throughout the disturbed area; but this forest will not naturally revert back to its former pristine state during the foreseeable future. - 5 - 3. Maritime Oak Barrens The vegetation occurring at the former Fort Cutchogue site is unique, and different from the oak-hickory forest adjacent to it. Although the area had been inhabited by Indians and probably had been influenced by early European settlers, the dominant vegetation is comprised of native species of trees, shrubs, and herbs. Plant communities are described and classified by determining two basic criteria: structure and composition. The structure of a terrestrial ecosystem is primarily determined by calculating the percent canopy cover of trees: "Open uplands" include communities with less than 25% canopy cover of trees; "forested uplands" include communities with greater than 60% canopy cover of trees; "barrens" include communities with 25% to 60% canopy cover of trees. Barrens are structurally intermediate between forests and open canopy uplands. The composition of a terrestrial ecosystem is determined by the dominant plant species that constitute the community. The former Fort Cutchogue site cannot be classified as a true "forest" community because it has less than 60% canopy cover of trees, therefore the area is structurally different from the oak-hickory forest on site. The Fort site also differs from the oak-hickory forest in composition, because one of the co-dominant trees at the site is post oak (Quercus stellata) which does not occur in the forest, and hickory trees are absent. The understory and groundcover at the Fort site also differs in structure and composition. The Fort site can be classified into the "barrens" category of - 6 - terrestrial ecosystems. According to Reschke (1990) the structure of the vegetation at the Fort site most closely corresponds to an ecosystem known as "oak openings," but the composition of the vegetation at the Fort site is significantly different from that of oak openings. Oak openings is a globally rare ecological community, known only in New York from the lowlands associated with Lakes Erie and Ontario. Thus, the vegetation at the Fort site can be classified as barrens, and the structure of the community is similar to that of oak openings. The composition of the shrublayer and groundcover is very similar to the °maritime grasslands' of Long Island's South Fork. Maritime grasslands have less than 25% canopy cover of trees and are therefore classified as open uplands. Since the vegetation at the Fort site combines characteristics of barrens, oak openings, and maritime grasslands, the community will be discussed in this report as the "maritime oak barrens." This ecosystem is known to occur at other locations on Long Island, and is currently being investigated by ecologists. The dominant trees comprising this community are post oak, black oak, scarlet oak, and white oak; the trees are somewhat stunted but not truly dwarf. The shrub layer is comprised of northern bayberry (Myrica pennsylvanica), winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), and a few scattered individuals of eastern red cedar (Juniperus virainiana). The oak openings and ground cover beneath the trees are dominated by native grasses and herbs, including common hairgrass (Deschampsia flexuosa), little bluestem (Schizacharium scoparium), poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), panic grass (Panicum depauperatum), Greene's rush (Juncus greenei), - 7 - Canada frostweed (Helianthemum canadensis), hyssop-leaved thoroughwort (Eupatorium hyssopifolium), sickle-leaved golden aster (Pityopsis falcata), blue toadflax (Linaria canadensis), flat-topped white aster (Aster paternus), sedge (Carex muhlenberaii), pussy toes (Antennaria plantaginifolia), and early goldenrod (Solidaao �juncea). Reindeer lichens (Cladonia spp.) are a common component of the groundcover, and dunegrass (Ammophila breviligulata) also occurs at the site, another indicator of the maritime influence on this community. Several non-native grasses and herbs occur at lower frequencies: two species of hairgrass (Aira caryoph ly lea and Aira praecox), rat-tail grass (Vulpiia myuros), velvet bent grass (Aorostis canina), sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), and yarrow (Achillia millefolium). 4. Salt Shrub Community The salt shrub community is a band of vegetation occurring between salt marsh and upland vegetation. A mosaic of shrubland and meadow is common where the topography is nearly level. Periodic disturbance associated with storms causes die-back of shrubs. Characteristic shrubs are Baccharis halimifolia (groundsel-tree), Iva frutescens (saltmarsh- elder), Rosa carolina (pasture rose), Juniperus virgin_ lana (red cedar), Prunus maritima (beach plum), Toxicodendron radicans (poison ivy), and Myrica pensylvanica (bayberry); characteristic herbs are Spartina patens (salt-meadow grass), Solidago sempervirens (seaside goldenrod), Panicum vir a um (switch grass), Opuntia humifusa (prickly-pear cactus), and Ammophila breviligulata (beach grass). - 8 - 5. Coastal Salt Marsh Bordering Downs Creek at the eastern edge of the property is a coastal salt marsh community ("coastal," as opposed to "inland" salt marsh which occurs on saline mudflats associated with inland salt springs) which may be divided into three distinct sub-communities: 1) the low salt marsh, 2) the high salt marsh, and 3) salt pannes. The vegetation of the low salt marsh is almost exclusively a monospecific stand of Spartina alterniflora (cordgrass). The high salt marsh is dominated by Spartina patens (salt- meadow grass), Distichlis s i a (spikegrass), and Juncus 9erardi (black- grass). Common species of the upper slope of the high marsh are Limonium carolinianum (sea-lavender), Aster tenuifolius (slender saltmarsh aster), and Iva frutescens (saltmarsh elder). Salt pannes occur in both low and high salt marshes where the marsh is poorly drained. Pannes in the low marsh usually lack vegetation, but pannes in the high marsh are usually vegetated by Salicornia europaea (annual glasswort), �. virginica (perennial glasswort), and Sper. ularia marina (saltmarsh sand spurry). At some locations eel grass (Zostera mariana var. stenophylla) has been deposited along the shoreline of the salt marsh. Eel grass is a very valuable source of food for certain species of wildlife (for example, wildfowl such as Brandt). 6. Phragmites Reed Marsh At the disturbed north end of the property Phragmites Reed (Phragmites australis) has invaded the wetlands and adjacent uplands - 9 - bordering the headwaters of Downs Creek. Phragmites is a non-native species of grass introduced from Eurasia, and forms a nearly monospecific stand at this location, having displaced the native plant species. Phragmites is a highly undesirable plant from an ecological point of view because it utilizes resources (water, nutrients, etc.) from the environment but does not return benefits back to an ecosystem. Phragmites is not a source of food for native wildlife species, but the native plants displaced by phragmites (i.e., cattails) do provide valuable benefits to native wildlife species. In 1957, Roy Latham published a paper on Phragmites and had this to say: °Most naturalists have a dislike for it [Phragmites]. Some detest it as an intruder. The botanist finds little worth searching for within its limits. The collecting entomologist finds it unproductive, difficult to get through or work in." - 10- RARE PLANTS Two rare plant species have been reported from the Cutchogue area by N. Y. Natural Heritage Program (Young, 1992; personal communication); however, neither species nor any other rare plant species were observed during the two site inspections. The old Fort Cutchogue site provides suitable habitat for both rare plant species and at the present time it cannot be definitely stated that neither species occurs on site. Bushy rockrose (Helianthemum dumosum) was first reported from the Cutchogue area in 1921 and was last observed in 1984. Globally, this rare plant has a very limited range, occurring from Massachusetts to Long Island, New York. Bushy rockrose occurs in dry sandy soils of open woodlands and barrens. The plants do not appear every year, and it has been suggested that fire may play an important role in the species' life cycle. The old Fort Cutchogue site provides .suitable habitat for this rare plant, and a very close relative, Canada rockrose (Helianthemum canadensis), does indeed occur on site. Velvety lespedeza (Lespedeza stuevei) was first reported from the Cutchogue area in 1919 and has not been reported since that time. Like bushy rockrose, this rare plant also occurs in dry sandy soils of open woodlands and barrens. The old Fort Cutchogue site provides suitable habitat for velvety lespedeza. Technical characters of the plant's flower are necessary for identification of this species. The flowering season of this species is from mid-August to late September; therefore it was not possible (during June and early July) to definitely determine whether or not velvety lespedeza occurs on site. - 1 1 - LITERATURE CITED Latham, R. 1957. Phragmites. The Long Island Naturalist 6: 26-27. Mitchell, R.S. 1986. A checklist of New York State plants. N.Y.S. Mus. Bull. No. 458. 272 p. Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. N.Y. Natural Heritage Program, N.Y.S. Dept. Envir. Conservation, Latham, NY. 96 p. Young, S. M. [ed.] 1992. New York rare plant status list. N.Y. Natural Heritage Program, N.Y.S. Dept. Envir. Conservation, Latham, NY. 78 p. - 12 - APPENDIX 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PARKS GUIDE TO NORTI4 FORK _ PARKS 8F ACHES J TOWN OF SOTMOI D Laurel Mattituck r Cutchogue New Suffolk - Peconic Southold Greenport East Marion Orient Fishers Island : Town of Southold , The Town of Southold has been fortunate in its coastal location which has been able to supply recreational opportunities for residents. The waters and t beaches of Long Island Sound and Peconic and Gardiners Bays taken with the S multitude of creeks that enter the bay on the south shore of the Town have provided some of the bounties of nature's assets. Opportunities to swim,to launch a boat,to fish and gather shellfish,to enjoy scenic vistas and the use of the beaches has been for over two centuries readily available to residents. Laurel Lake Park is located on the Main Road(Route 25)in Laurel and houses an information center,2 baseball fields,a playground, and parking for those who wish to use the adjacent state land for fishing. Mattituck Creek Boat Lau4dit Ramp:is located on North Road(Route 48). This facility offers parking and boat launching for residents and non- residents by permit only. New Suffolk Beach is located on Jackson Street in New Suffolk and pro- vides lifeguards and beach attendants. A boat launching ramp and ample parking facilities are available by town permit only,for residents and non- residents. [.okbmith Inlet Peconic: is Sound front property along west side of Goldsmith's Inlet opposite the County Park:on Mill Road Peconic. This Property does not have lifeguards. Goose Creek This facility overlooks Southold Bay and has lifeguards and restrooms. Parking by Southold Town permit only. Kenny's Beach is located at the end of Kenny's Road in Southold. Beach overlooks the sound and has lifeguards and restrooms. Parking bg Southold ; Town permit only. McCabe's Beach: is located 1/2 mile east of Kenny's Beach,on North Sea Road in Southold. Beach overlooks the sound and has lifeguards and rest- rooms. parking by Southold Town permit only. A, Town Beach: is located on the North Road(Route 48)in So70verr- looking the sound. This is the most used town-owned beach include restroonm playground,and picnic area. Parking by Southold Town permit only. Beach has lifeguards and beach attendants. S1ip�er Horbm Park(Chamber of Commerce: is located on the Main Road(Route 25)in Greenport with an information center 8r picnic area. Norman S Nbp park is located on Manhasset Avenue in Greenport and is also known as Gull Pond Beach The beach overlooks Shelter Island and Is contains a large parking area,playground,and has lifeguards 8r beach ;. attendants. Parking and boat launching by Southold Town permit only. ; y Fishers lslat This is our community to the north,geographically ' separated from the mainland. Both public and private resources supply ` sites and fact-Wes for recreation. The Island People's Project is a commu- i nitygroup that is responsible for the bulk of recreational programming. For fiather mfovrmatian,call Ken Reeves,Recreation Supervism, at 765-S=L 199S Beach Parking Permit Fees Resident Daily Beach Permits $6.51/year Non-Resident Daily Beach_Permits $8:68/day Guest/Lessee Permits $3255/vehicle 4 Hotel-Motel Permit $21.70/season Non-Resident Seasonal Permit $108.50/season Includes both car and trailer(Valid Year-Round) BEACH ATTENDANTS ISSUE RESIDENT&NON-RESIDENT DAYS PASSES AT NEW SUFFOLK BEACH,TOWN BEACH AND e NORMAN R KLIPP PARK-HOURSS-At30 ate-5:00 p-m.— FOR INFORMATION REGARDING OTHER PASSES,PLEASE I t CONTACT THE TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE AT 765-1800, MONDAY-FRIDAY,8:00 A.M.-4:00 P.M. A, Le w-SudbA Pack District The Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District parks are the Private property of the residents who reside within the Park District and all who use them are subject to rules and regulations set forth by'the commissioners. - The Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District is bounded on the west side by _ the Mattituck Park District and on the east side by the hamlet ofPeconic, which is not within a park district. The Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District maintains two bag front parks,Fleet Neck Beach f and Nassau Point Community Beach. � l Use of these tacagities are free to residents of the Cutchogue-New Sum Park District :and their guests n,eks and/or beaches are under the Jurisdiction folbwu�g Pte' � of the Cutchogue-New Suffo&Park District: Nassau Poaft Beach: Causeway beach with swings and slides,sandbox, } barbecue grill,picnic tables,park benches,handicap ramp,basketball court, 4 roped off bathing area,bathroom facilities, and lifeguards on duty over the. summer months. The Nassau Point Community Beach is a parcel of consid- erable acreage and beachfront on Little Peconic Bay and wetlands areas on K the west into Broadwater Cove. The causeway,Nassau Point Road divides the park and provides easy access. Parallel to the beach and off the cause- way is a large parking area. Attendants on duty to issue and check permits. posh Avenue Beach(Fleet Neck Beach): Park and beach with swings, slides,young children's playground equipment,park benches, picnic tables;barbecue-grills,basketl; A cOurt_bathroom facilities,handi- cap ramp that leads to the beach,a roped off swimming area,lifeguard on f duty,and attendants at entrance to issue and check permits. t Mattituck Park District ' The Mattituck Park District parks and beaches are the private property of the residents who reside within the Park District and all who use them are subject to the rules and regulations set forth by the commissioners. J The fonawing parka and/or beaches are under the jurigdietio n , of the Mattituck Park District f - - Breakwater Park located on the west side of Mattituck Inlet,is a Long Island Sound Beach with parking area and restrooms- i Bafe's Beach Park is located on the east side of Mattituck Inlet There is a Boy Scout cabin in the upland area Wolf Pit Labe: is a small pond whichhasbeen used for ice skating when weather permits and has lights on it for night skating. Mattituck Creek Boat Launchi a Park is located along the North Road(Route 48)at the head of Mattituck Creek Access is by permit only and is limited to Park District residents. I Aldrich Lane Park This property is adjoining and north of Laurel School and currently has a night-lighted softball and soccer field. Mattituek Park District Beach-Yacht Club Pr�. is located ` along Peconic Bay Boulevard The site is developed for a softball field with ' night-lighting,a ar area,and beach : parking ' Marratnoka Lake: is a parcel of land and pond along south side of Main Road in Mattituck which has been preserved for open space and scenic use. d Winter ice skating weather permitting accounts for its most active use. Bag Avenue Park is the site of an-existing Little League field,small park- ing area,two tennis courts,and a small wetlands area along James Creek I e Mattituck Park District(continued) Veterans Memorial Park a Peconic Bay front park at the terminus of Bay Avenue,Mattituck,has pavilion buildings,parking area,picnic area,play apparatus area,a boccie court and shuMe board court,and is lifeguarded over the summer. t Orient-East Marian Park Distrtct The Orient-Fast Marion park district parks and beaches are the private property of the residents who reside within the Park District and all who use them are subject to the rules and regulations set forth by the commissioners. i - F The following parks and/or beaches are under the jurisdiction of the Orient Fast Mariam Park District: , Truman's Beach: located on Route 25 in Orient:is utilized by Orient-Fast a Marion residents. The District also owns a parcel of property(55 acres)on r the south side of Main Road most of which is wetlands. No services(life- guards,restrooms)are provided. r f t , K r s' d COME 4 - AND GET 1 ITll Q• r Southold Park Distrcct ,Fip The following parks are under the jurisdiction of the Southold Park District,established in 1907. The Southold Park District is in the Hamlet of Southold and consists of the Village Fire District, excluding the Peconic and Bayview areas. the boundaries of the Southold Park District were originally defined as old school district number five as it existed in 1907. The parks are the private property y of residents who reside within the Park District and all who use them are subject to the rules and regulations set forth bg the commissioners. Use of the Founders Landing and Fanerson Parks are free t* to Southold Park District residents and then'guests. _ S! 'triangle Park is located on the north side of Route 25(Main Road)as s, you travel east,just west of the Willow HM Cemetery. Southold's War Memorial for World War Z Korea,and Vietnam is visible as you drive by. This park is open to the general public for picnics and stretching your legs after a long drive. 7. Eme s—m Park is located at the end of South Harbor Road and has a picnic area,sandy beaches,and a beautiful view of Peconic Bay. This facility is an unprotected beach with no lifeguards on duty. Founders Landipg. is located at the end of Hobart Road and overlooks Southold Bay. There are picnic tables,swings for the children,a bath- } room„and lifeguards on duty with a roped-off swimming area. Lifeguard is on duty from July 1st through Labor Dag. s uorton s point Iagh1h990 park is located at the end of Lighthouse Road and was the site selected bg George Washington in 1797 for con- dr struction of a lighthouse to assist ships sailing from Boston to New York Currently,the Southold Historical Society maintains a nautical museum at the site and the site provides a magnificent view of the Long Island Sound. ! F 1 HAVE A SAFE AND ENJOYABLE SUMMER!!! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THOMAS H.WICKHAM,SUPERVISOR JOSEPH J.LMWM COUNCILMAN ALICE J.HUSSIES COUNCILWOMAN JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND JR.,COUNCILMAN RUTH D.OLIVA,COUNCILWOMAN LOUISA P.EVANS,JUSTICE g. - S JUDITH T.TERRY,TOWN CLERK RAYMOND L.JACOBS,SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS f i SUFFOLK i PARK DESTRUCT GEORGEANNA FOGARTY 3 LOTS ROSLAK l BARBARA SHALVLY i MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT COIONERS EDWARD S.ADAMS s GERARD P.GOEHRINGER JR ' WALTER P.SABAT ORIRTU'F,ST MARION PARK DLS1IWT COMMISSIONERS t BARBARA EDEEN STEWART HORTON R ALFRED NORKLUN r - h it SOUIHOLD PARK DISRRIGT COMMISSIONERS ROBERT G COCHRAN MICHAEL HAGERMAN ANTONE F.SKWARA,JR APPENDIX 7 CORRESPONDENCE Ka�KS AND RECREATION AREAS as of 1/30•/81 v EAST MARION L. I . Sound Stephenson Beach, Inc. Beach T:�uman's Beach 3 acres (leased to Or.-Em. Main Road, East Marion Park District) . Oysterponds School Dist .Recreation . NIS Main Road,East Marion 10 acres Southold Town Misc. N/E of East Marion Cemetery 1/3 acr( GREENPORT ,_Southold Town Park L. I . Sound east of Sound Road, Greenport 1 acre Southold Town Beach L. I . Sound S/W of Inlet Pond Lane 1 acre Greenport Southold Town Beach Gardiners Bay, Gull Pond Norman E. Klipp Marine Park 3j acre= Manhanset Aver r7enpgrt f- 'A 'JcQ B /, CXI' D �cLC D2 Southold Town Launching Ramp Sterling Basin Beach Road, Greenport 1' acre SOUTHOLD qG0�:qe2►- Tc'efo{�eac�Brr� Southold Town Beach L. I . Sound - Town Beach 6 acres North Road, Southold Dl��rctr rat C_cc Southold Town Beach LI Soun Horton' s Lane, Southold acre 565 //,/) I eachrFra Southold Town Beach L. I . Sound nn L tea- ch Kenney ' s Road, Southold 5 acres Southold Town Recreation S/W of Ackerly Pond Lane Southold 2 acres Southold Town Beach Peconic, `Bay;-6dO//netr-feeof'be ,4i5;c-- 'Goose Creek,N,, Bayview Road 2 acres Southold Southold Town Misc. Corey Creek Laughing Waters, Southold 2 3/4 acrr Southold Park District Park Horton ' s Point Lighthouse Road, Southold 8 3/4 acr< Southold Park District Park Town Creek Youngs Avenue, Southold 1/3 acrt Southold Park District Beach Pecoiiie' Bay .- - Founders Landing 1 3/4 Hobart Road, Southold Southold Park District Beach , Peconic Bay South harbor Road , Southold 4 acres Southold Park District Park Triangle Park Main & Lower Roads , Southold 1j acre PECONIC -2 D 0 /!hr'a r4ec &y-Q,e a_-/r-�roN-�` Southold Town Beach L. I . Sound - Peconic Inlet Mill Lane, Peconic 1 acre Southold Town Recreation ' Recreation Center E Peconic Lane, Peconic 2 4 acre: o gL/30/81 page 2 Y 4 CUTCHOGUE Cutchogue-New Suffolk Misc. V Park District SIS New Suffolk Lane 10 acre Cutchogue Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District Beach Peconic- Bay .Causeway Nassau Poiri;, Road, Cutchogue 192 acr. Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District Beach Bay-Fleets Neck Pequash Avenue,,Cutchogue 1 acre NEW SUFFOLK Southold Town Park Bay -First Street, New Suffolk 1 acrc MATTITUCK Southold Town Misc'. Mattituck Creek Westphalia Rd. ,Mattituck 12 acre Mattituck Park District Beach L. I . Sound Bailie Beach Road,Mattituck 222 acre Mattituck Park District Beach L. I . Sound Breakwater Rd. , Mattituck 174 acrE Mattituck Park District Park Wolf Pit Lake 3 acre Mattituck Mattituck Park District Misc. D4arratooka Lake 4 acres SIS Main Road, Mattituck Mattituck Park District Beach- Peconic Bay, SIS Peconica Park Bay Blvd. -Bay Ave. ,Mattituck 5" acre Mattituck Park Dist"ict Recreation SIS Peconic Bay B1vd. ,Mattituck 5 acres Mattituck Park District Launching Mattituck Creek Ramp NIS Middle Road,Mattituck 1 acre Mattituck Park District Recreation ' E/S Bay Avenue, Mattituck 4 acres LAUREL Town of Southold Recreation Laurel Lake 11iacres I �M r~ DOWNS CREEK We-nic Land Trust SRO L 1(i. _ _ '',• _-- -��` _ __ ---', _ Q nw r Irw..r - — �� -0. — — _ _ K ----------- ---- --- -------------- -- f' i- __ - --------- IBM ----- ® r ®� O A�1 3M DAT& 'AAA m ,�,� i.TOTAL ARL-NSA.ACM2 I TOTAL LL* M OF ROAD.2,.150n.. 0 a TOTAL•RrnoT o LOTS-+� 4 ZO.M Lox 04DCT A—C AORInl1URAL CONSIOMTM AMES ———— ————Low —————— i r _ _ _ __ mom sm� 15 moo" 11mroc"PLA. . i --------20 �i� • _ At CYTCR /r w R! R01T1116D S.T•r CrNA ROA M • I 25— Tri e.>.r: ur ._ .. I Town Hall. ,53095 Main Road P.O. OX cr► �-< Southold. Now Y��11971 • Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-18o 1 LAND PRESERVATION COMMITTEE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 23, 1992 William J. Baxter 1030 Putnam Avenue Greenwich, CT 06830 Dear Mr. Baxter: I enclose a copy of a memorandum to me from Supervisor Harris dated October 21, 1992 requesting that the Land Preservation Committee _ process and consider your proposal to sell 21.7 acres including the site of "Fort Corchaug" to the Town of Southoldfor $1,000,000. At our meeting last night, with Councilman Wickham in attendance, the committee agreed to comply with the Board's request and place your property on the open space agenda for our next meeting on November 17. 1992. We invite you to attend that meetinq which will be in the Conference Room at 7:30 p.m. I must ask you to complete the enclosed application form which will supplement your letter to me of October 19th. Before our next meeting we would also like you to clarify the status of the proposal which you submitted to the Planning Board on April 6, 1992 for a development of 42 building lots on your property. In processing your offer we want to avoid conflict with any proposal pending before another town agency. I look forward to seeing you on November 17th. If there is anything i can do in the interim, please call me. - Sincerely, pp FAR:JW Frederick A. Ross-, Chairman Southold Town Land Preservation Committee Enclosures cc - Town Board Land Preservation Committee Members Planning Board 2 f ' M . `wo proposals Ciled Hw%ter has ,cJ_m,1T,;d• two plan, to Soutllold Proposals which includes Fort f t• . .t ti+:'c ho a rmma tonic to wri board from An Rass_ frorn p$g,• dt+praised br the count._ he saki tbrvugh the Sire fan t�K.a :i;a:r:u:att ut :ltc Suuthotd Land Prescivation Comm"I ":, Harras said he •vas rchrt:- _YC!. he iti dirt forward liix;ar• ;i:�t nlan call: 1';+r preserving �1.; ac:cs of the r,rt la make ary it ccisiun a n uith his ,:;rlt gtiijgfccling i� tpo ndirg mcss much �Forttd Cor haug Baxter carni, inaidtng Fort Corchaug.while creating a suh- %;.hc•tlrtr 1he town ct:;ilal pur- to r••ct r,' , seri to through tits woulJ t>t ":;utosnaticallt ' j;vi.%ion v' lk hemL•s an:;r elle land ant l : !a:asnil rllnnirg prctr;; Much of eliminated from the subdisi- 13;txtcr;sccaand plan•according to the memo,atutJWa d agrinst the count). wttt.lt ;r„lanJ a lis S%Jutrrwd un u- .toil ravess.'• i subdr,ision of:3 hc►ntes, presert.rng 3.2 acres ofpaskland. "noses Southold. is sct:lcd. iahie thra+u•'i p w•hit:h includes the fart site. The enema States that the sec- He said the 1aw.uit stem; •!+e SEQR.� Preszning the fon. frdtti the a'he l Lance Sts i%tatc F.narror.m.ntal Qua!- Penns' said. is fatr!y cumpi:- � - tiriat p,-ar,-'vr, hold"by 8axicr.was filed with the lows plan- S ity Rr:ioN Aatt procc:a. , he rate;; hecause the planrtir� :ling%*,flies on Aprit 6. 194''. pu:chax offer after uf+datiag a,tid. appraisals, which substanti- hoard is involved in the strh- L:ndt:r the first plan Satter is ofTerifI the town 2l. Coitnt•ilmarl Georgy division and the Town board aues, for Sl million,or$46,083 pct acre. if the tower cannot :slip reduced tha .t►utrt}•'s of- Penny said th,rC are teary is invalsed in the pr iptisal 1r. purchase the acreage, he intrnds to Igo for.*,-aid with the sec- kr to parcltace tht proper%y. to (+r;icrti. tete fort purchase t>1c land. -4nd, hr cleat pian,the more densely dcseloped subditiis}an. 71it tau" w•ai teamed t» the p' •'The gland pie4rvation) cotnrnittea is considering a .,.it Harri, .:aid. hcccsuaC such JS Nh pl trr,ing pratt-S). said specific zrrangemtnts it, niyuc parcel uC land which contains treasures beyond town fands were t ► nc L,r:l such ai �+� u -tit open• :pace bring the tort t,ndcr to-711 ' prlxC�3lia!n. t'+jst.rin�. til- t?prtfshlp still naa°rt.>> ti:•- pn,,A ' according cel to Russ.-While the 5oundanes of the Cort ,t.;r t.ah u►;iti} fit";+> tv at: linitc, the silt is earl of our infinite American her+ta- purclak rte..prvpct:�. C<ntl.e .•t':ttr,X„1„at SFQR A. crdcd. C_ It vemi fair to say that tole Men anJ carmen represent- 8;tstrr ,;tial ire crag peri rvarit►ntst Organizations stronfl} f vor purcltasc by :wing iba rawnta. ;Ve talon r, the town. many insisting that all 104 acre•hr..squired.” Sat►cn;Or Scott Harris sai t Fort Corchaug is the i-'ni} :lc -.3-jth^ to ar, hay :l- ;Iuo%n Indian tort site on Long bland in its original wilds- stitv;i t>Llemc; it•. - '.. arty The Nalton3l P3ik Servicc is interested in putUoc Fort curi;rnin; tr puichasr ilia: the Na'tionat Keitisler of Htatoric Places. he- rtr[s-ir-rtes• for C r .. ; i..�n• •_...; s--lest - that the tt;,> R.tr;r C?::7 d s Dr. staph Solecki, adjun f professor emeritus este Ceti- at:arre. .tithatlic!oun. tumh:.. t'nivcrsit!r, di�rovercd she fort in the lt)2N.. Harfis fL.t:tcr s:.td ht is seise!. -lt'% hard to say what the chance of d.Vciopment will -loping to Prc•;rrta: Qx to:t t:,, t•.dxd an the archeological and ecological signit-icirlL: Sire, art 'rc+jws is t.,n to p-:- tit:%;t+d ;-'ta! thrawgh ;t;.quistEta)n SFE Page l? h: S•,tithk4if Town. }k ,ait: %mic the is t.:wa: ;al; ti •�iw'.i •.11:.••- :►r:. ho hvtl i :.lt.r,_ '•ti. ;.r..• :;:SSC m.qr Ot ,t 1•n i t ::hal +.:a•.r. Ili_' ir�•t� :L'h :.. 4. •.t!It. Dial I:� t'::r! itl-'t . - �:.�-!i':+'a! 1a•r `:1 ►a lid drt' -.,ii•! 'l t' lie:.- a I:t•a[�:til Qt !- • :,tl•!U•�.iS T: {fit•wenn. He,.r•: i alt D'.1+1.r.Yjj::•D )fC{:•,: avoi, •tfsan J•nln:l t., a• l; idr.° ksxt:r r• �u! .t 1<� ARCOFOLOGNAL 30CIRTY Or CUIIMRCTICIrr: f)III LB m pit 1 .,►'• \ �� 'iii 14. i YR911fi.G1l�M1 •►► `"`--•... .,,.,.rte F.1 jr O rt` M) +"n �•A rr:Et �n /'lir,. 1. Finn of Tort Corchnun,. ha aortia. Shmal taotn mull within the In.- tit, ILAI)urt.ln bud ti►rnod over twot�rwl.- __ torlor of the felt disalorod Do •pp'IreDt low elJMll acpnot%r (?►f . :�, �), nt�out 12 �1glt aa Of eoou}:t1on, ah�u«h heri,rftl VXAII Ihet 1n dlonmter asverei (rode south of the pieoae of bro►rn glavad vxactrery, prtmirnb.11 southern Mort NT11.. 11r. Goddard had +►rale An of onlonial orlgln, vmre found. No omorm- nxoevetion "idlately rdjao*nt to the de•. tional •viUaoe appoorod ire!-.1•livt+tty to tAp presojon as tits northiant corner (!'ig. 3, Borth or the rant, trot a atvRl.i roruve do- poalt mWposed of Shells rea roaud 010V4 to Ttt.n Alt►urtla oolle+►tian is iww hOLwftd tb* baud of Darns Civok on a 11ttl* knoll mt the lhiraa s of the Amorioan IndlAn, 11430 (notoe tektun o:t•April 17, 19)7). Tho •reN rcmidottoa. .14"erokl rim and body shsrda, to t1w souti At MA V)rt aaM1 to the hay in very r,lr�llar to MY..01% found at OOrobeugg •ICit etre-on nith svidanaa of "borlglanl aeau- ttlolt!10A Stt the nollection. The r000rdx psuey, pelnatrAl.ly t!o rornin.v of shollfAmb. erodit th%wa ah*rdK to Tbro►, Milo Rmztor, north of Xtv%hnmpton, but tbel or* u+ ilst• ' "°?ro SmsM.iftfitac* kM:t xfada mr.111 tante t'mkablr Tort norobnug wars, end It lit fnORtl k at tl'ri xnT* prjow.. t•n t!,o •gy1r!ir's vxp."rx- that Mr. Alhurtie dug at the fort. Kr. !i�1�'. ? N't row rt :fi-. AlblutSc a�.. Itt, (loltt+nxd that. !:n fount oln Tcm..t V*b1s •'': Tlno 1. lbr�wZ�+t! 'af ao-ar;tc.;;l 1,npq xsta�►q. vorral rl' tk%A mhnrn,itwristto ityT9` B�elita+r, . :'4 "'�Y /s l101JiCKI! ARCN701,0011,A), QASTT:uN 1)y CURT C1:Rf.}Il•i t't ►' ,AP..y�1t�i of the !!L?n n.' the •nnlonvie !►R ( *R, Jour• L►r•-v1n M•Qn tr* (+1Pa^tv6t1Cn tAMIP-q!"rtRrv. !Pr j•11 AQS•A, - it pit ).ntof-14t I L1)%,t. ep tore nn PIF rtr,tllQ l�Rt1Th��t p.R+ Rc�iR1lI WMI tir•- Jnbn A G. ,wvfl (196.7), th♦ dreo` r•. etud..• Wall Lha ftn't. >nn L1 of )nt r•in`n3., Yle+1- ORk of I.It+r oklnlnel naPx:ta, it Ye* lcarne�l `ria, Wt htc grandfather, t+ho came to Tort 4•!nk • 111 Iftfo, htzd told htm that there Ismd 4nen A virri."y or rnh!1 r•%nning through th• t+art +n Dr, tfJ).?1:nn Wall000 T Pk0:, thr Lnnl[ 1nAle ata•A cow tb•+ %;,)p (, a. 3)through reforrad laxand aolaols•,r':lkl 04 ih! ottp in leg). to tit t!.1+ votttholtl tavn renorde lrbovo), trlth Mr, rvax; lrtt g-vl the Re.PYt dov-'­� Nocort)fvg to tkkn j• (sWAtb4Ir 11te•l, ime Poll% )rtptinll air t.1Nt of 1!01!b 1•�-nifn, r.941,rg tbl"% ih the rnxtMrANt arum. r of the fert wan snip- trtt) .lrp-A ". a in henvr tit^.ryf' IF)T Mta, Cris • - rer,Tl t— h'v .11 •'*r!fll- (Ptq, °) . TO-, bola or 1.1+nt tim alta ned bean na+.l�t%r�v4 for C!"I 111•.. i+ r•'•ntir ms-1 by Cann nn rR BX04i•ttio-W ui y-lcrP. R5 rod-3 U19i );M,1 hie .,.;--!^gtf.C11 U1*11 s�polQ+rrl+le S�+�Fth Inn++t.[tn.ltt •�n+•ret fiPt+c+lrt�, tb1F r.!rtoria nil. nttonlA M py*rerT04 ASN)% !'K^• 1: 12).), Taal%'+d (Toohar, 1893). • Nt^I.IfN�'Plh�t ttE ?�Nf t;llgCil,t4' T;1n cont: rit% An miti-Atnt1 n- t.h!! t)rt.•np r)r Wmi ]fail,* •+ tlA!/, 4'h+ tir.�^, Q}r>,I,1rG'tlrt^. t Jnr+•, cow m-m Ren`. nldo of runt r-,tt-, n�rG t,, ( of t.t•v fti%1, tTem) n•+ A;)%-I1 1r. -A ul'n creak. 1:atRnvn Rettte i?j nni'l VIA. ^ri.tt;tt l.nR- `.•nv done r;I, ,tn)r ,) �t 1YJ1•il, I�r•ICd, one-1•e.li' ,tile woet r r the Ytapgos ,r C'ntoftrue an gurfal%t: County, L. 1. It 1!t Th* h:t•ve Cr•-%•:• 11 Y ndnut iMn feat north of re000ln Pnf. in a Ter.+_p, rr!anuring only nbovt :ra Atlnhaa .1 } eta Ovuw% gro-th of hrttnb enol trent, 41+%r_.an thlnkDOR" At. tte !.sent !+orLl«te~;+ly, tbls the 11 ,nn lariat road nnik the oreek l P4+a, 2, urea hest never > •an p1r,vetf•11. me dinturbod*; 3). otnyra1t.Vf All tho fsntu*e•n coeLn hr;_�7 barn ni+r••at-eat oblit::trated crud prrU•'yn tctal,lp 7;)n fork Aro orlontt,d neerl.y lea., Wbaro town hneuo malar. )n hre!tyr., Borth, R^•ath, onct., and wont In oblong o;lt- prluolpoll.y arc%nd tk'9 fnrt wtill.r n.-•ol10- llttwa. TTe l;mXla +%„a 21:0 feat ,long north en!! tiunel debris, rr/.nly broken r1►01i enc++till Path,%, and )60 twrtt long hor)t nnA "mt. 'i'he !+rq,e 4nn)..avr) to o.lot+e to thFra••quert-trn of nn A..t;r., h r.ryt vry t.f reprf.ngn z inn eh.,r:r. the ,�. hi•,h 11.4e Vele] of nevorel. Qatnt•e on thq b•ry et tho lrA-k bola-# tt.o rewt, I'll" s-ltn i.A tbmn tpn ernok at mean eoo .l''•�+t=-��i i. )efot. Thaw in n broad 44a llv 1 t y t-t+rnnf h y;_ , ger. %1) anal. n*11 drrma to the urn•-k. K,nt of rt t► b: •�.�1 CSF: •" `r _ - !:!:•) etnhnt+k!!W1nt +trotlna tbn tvTt w•%s t.rnot-nhle �, 'w, ;+= st the rime (1.937) the bratsh lnln cltn.•PA tiff. 5r)� •t; �� Thn trentorn 1►.ol.f of the north wall rn•t rola- ti-1e17 tbw "at dintinat. The embnnkvaat in �kt�f' G7r'� : f �` �p CR An RrelrsRh about 15 rest nide, ani obout ;r. �eX 1.5 r4A bio legit the ttigbaat point on th•r * {''i '=`• • • earth e~e11. Jwaral ol.o.)r;tn and nttnlJ.r,- dv- •;y%i/"; ': - presslons patrallol the rnt!onk_ent econ►Id th r i)rt, 4tt4e4 "v14 %,ro11•Ihlp th1 bor-r+)} %` h)i► : ll,+!:,• .•p 1 Alt6kies 1)raaw whf ah the earth mer tnrer tin b sg,,;s C)ctF+ OA • P110 Meta innt the ra).lsv,d? Ponta. �ir l .. t�! ' •> A,d v • ff �7 10r! to n !r.r. a nit in the noethen4L :,,i� , )•'. 4 ;(-•�='Js .1ahid b;7h 1i r.T11tMtP+t.•.tll.r LMD fFt�C)+r� _- �•.. :'�?�7+�r' �^2 - . �_• !'^•��l, I' e%#.% .ptl r,.rnnw (ab!)rA), (';►+ , - t :A "0 0�t><Svnnye" l+ 3 Shnl.tow paroh %till r) rr•o6it� t! •v'w"i f4tgoa014 rwlalr.n f..rn'l th* northwnat aor liar )-.1-• 1 -•� •'_�` Af t f wt thrOnF?) tho In;.:idle of the noutb 10.1% t_4.1 ntr,*rr,lrm rar ncmp 9lrn!1lr*r,.t. •11-crWir any sr )>urlasa os by #!Z!n):An, i:tolttttlnr, Cnrlxlo lt, / 900-rAlnety, M4 Vottp Pnd CIMN)r3 :a� ► 1t'!t!nn, All of Mi"I rJarvAo trltr. aouarutel by tha *,t 91F t11e pl.oaq„ Tt:l1 ►..los :tpr,;►, nip 67 rens riled I►lg. 2, Ivrt G w) l+euj, rt+a;,,hng�ta�. tons Rr 'g -A:].Zit. t•a• the. 81ta `vl C)1;rr9ntt Leen Mr"I �1^.Itt ( lAlr,r.d, Por yG h, �t.1 No. 91, Fall, 1985 29 feet (76.2cm) in diameter and about I foot (30.5cm) deep. He noted nothing of interest in this open hole. There was an indication of another shovel test measuring 2 feet (61cm) square situated some 15 feet (4.6m) "south of the entrance to the fort" and 21 feet (6.4m) west of the rail fence marking the eastern boundary of the park. The hole had been back-filled, leaving a small grassed in depression. Druss took 10 photographs of the site. Druss did not make any maps because Father O'Halloran's sketch map and Smith's (1954) published map were on file at the-museunt.We may*add here that my own unpublished sketch map is on file with the Nassau County Museum records (Figure 3). Druss was of the impression that the site might still yield some good data for future investigations. Illy own opinion is that since the site had been bull-dozed over once lightly, an future investigations would have to take this into account. To my knowledge. the only part of the tort site where artifactual data had been recovered wls in the shell re ttse mt c e re-excavation oft is feature would ave to be in the nature of a salvage measure, because 'll-Wa-A'll->a-Abeen churned through by amateur archaeologists before the site came to title attention of properly trained investigators. Fort Corchaug, at Cutchogue, was the objective of a half hour reconnaissance made February 20, 1985. The site, registered officially in the National Register, is the second known extant Indian fort site on Long Island. The site did not quite resemble the open condition it was in when I began my investigations there over 45 years ago. The occasion of this field inspection was to trace the boundaries of the palisade embankment in company with members of the Cutchogue-New Suffolk Historical Society. These members included James Grathwohl, John Halsev and Virginia McCaffery. Formerly the Downs Farm, and now the property of William Baxter of Greenwich, Conn., we found that the old farm road access to the property from Peconie Bay Boulevard to the south was blocked by a new house. Skirting this property on foot, we reached the old Downs farm road, which still appeared to be in good shape although it was obviously disused. Covered with heavy leaf mold, it is deeply incised (c. 1-1.5 feet) (c. 30.5-45.7cm) in the ground, indicating its age. It has not seen wheeled traffic in a long time, because twigs and new tree 0 APPROXIMATE POINTS. SHOVEL TESTS NORTH O DITCH DEPTH IS 5" 010 20 30 40 50 , SHELL MIDDEN I L SCALE IN FEET TAPE A COMPASS MAP BY R SOLECKI Figure 3. Thr Solecki map of Furl Massapeal: im pumishrdl. 30 THE BULLETIN branches at eye level had to be watched out for. On the way toward the fort site, I showed the group where the Baxter site was located. This is the site which I had discovered and tested in my survey on Downs Creek, and which Bert Salwen (1966) and later William A. Ritchie explored (Ritchie, 1969:169- 170). Flanking the road, we noted some old type bent-tree fencing. I had some difficulty at first in identifying my old landmarks because new tree growth and bushes had obscured land ground so much. :\t the (ince of n►y investigations, the former owner, Mr. Downs, had cleared the land as a pasturage for his cows. Since then, the land had reverted back to trees and bushesnewtree growth sprouting from the old cut stumps. The trees were mainly oaks and maples, with a few cedars. Approaching the fort site from the south, we found clues to its location in the form of broken clam shells peeping out of the sandy turf. It was with a little relief that I identified the area of the southeast corner of the palisade embankment. Looking north from this spot, we could trace the lite of the east embankment, which goes through a low swale in this area. We took time to take a couple photographs of ourselves standing on the embankment. It appeared to be about 12 feet (3.7m) wide with a rather faint rise in elevation. Following the line of the palisade to the north, we came to the northeast corner of the fort where still prominent is a deep hollow. This may have been originally a well or a pit house enclosed by the palisade. On the northern periphery of the pit can be still clearly seen traces of Charles Goddard's old excavation. Turning toward the west, we were able to see the northern embankment fairly clearly through the trees looking toward the old farm road. There is a very perceptible rise of about a foot in the embankment, accentuated by the flanking shallow ditches on both sides. As elsewhere, the palisade embankment is covered with leaf mold, fallen twigs, briers, etc. The "old cartway" dating from the latter half of the seventeenth century cutting diagonally across the fort from the northwest to the southeast was still fairly easy to make out. About the width of a wagon track, it is incised into the turf to a depth of about half a foot (c. 15.2cm) at least. On a slight diagonal to the west of the odd cartway we were able to pick out the west palisade embankment as a broad low linear tumulus fading into the distance through the trees. We were impressed by the quietness of the area. A few homes could be seen distantly on the Opposite shore of Downs Creek, but other than that, the peacefulness of the area could transport one back to pre-colonial times. We saw a decrepit hunter's duck blind by the creek shore, and near it a couple large holes in the sandy soil. We thought that they might have been made by muskrats.There were two or three hummocks of marsh grass off shore which Grathwof 1 thought might be muskrat habitats. Quite satisfied that the fort site was still intact and undisturbed, we retraced our steps back the way we came. It is hoped that the Corchattg fort site will one day be protected as part of Long Island's cultural heritage. It is without peer on the whole Atlantic seaboard. Bibliographic References Druss, Mark n.d. Surface Survey of Fort .tlassapeag Site, Fort Neck, L.I., New York. Nassau County Museum of Natural History, Seaford Division. Aug. 17, 1966. 3 pages. Morice, John H. 1942 Was There a Battle at Fort Neck? Long Island Forum, i(12):231-237. Ritchie, William ,_1. 1969 The Archaeology of New York State. The Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Smith, Carlyle 1950 The Archaeology of Coastal New York. Inthropological papers of the American Museum of,Natural History, Vol. 43, Part 1. New York 1954 A Vote on Fort Massapeag. American -Intiquity 20(1):67-68. Salwen, Bert 1966 Sea Levels and archaeology in the Long Island Sound Area. American Intiquity 28(f):46-57. No. 91, Fall, 1985 31 Solecki. Ralph 1950 The Archaeological Position of Fort Corchaug. Archaeological Society of Connecticut Bulletin No. 24. Williams, Lorraine 1972 Ft. Shantok and Ft. Corchaug: A Compnratire Study of Seventeenth Century Culture Contact in the LongIsland Sound Area. Ph.D. Dissertation, new l ark University University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Maguire Group Architects/Engineers-Planners,PC. 3237 Route 112 Medford,NY 11763 Telephone 5161696-6007 Fax 5161696-6054 July 14, 1995 MLt. Conway t Town of Southold Police GRC)UP 41405 Route 15 Peconic, New York 11958 RE: Indian Shores DEIS Dear Sir: Please find enclosed a map, description and preliminary traffic analysis for the project known as Indian Shores. We are preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and must identify significant impacts the project may have on the Police Department Services. I thank you for your telephone comments provided on July 14, 1995 where you identified the following concerns: 1. Equestrian or Winery Special Events (shows, tours, etc. ) may have an adverse impact on traffic especially along NYS 25. Some provision for coordination with Southold Police during these events is required. If possible, these events should be avoided or limited to off season and off peak traffic time. 2. Residential Homes There will be some impact to the Police service if these units are considered with all other recent or planned developments-, Independent of this cumulative effect, no major service problems are anticipated. Response to home alarm systems are a constant demand on the Town Police. This must be considered during evaluation of the project. Please contact me by phone or letter if you have any additional comments, otherwise I shall include the aforementioned in our records. A New York Professional Service Corporation in Association with Maguire Group Inc. Again, thank you for your input. It does help. to address development impacts and methods to minimize them. Very truly yours, Mt MAGUIRE GROUP Architects/Engineers/Planners, P.C. GROUP Jeffrey L. Seeman REM/RA/CEI/CEP Environmental Director JLS:ms Enc. 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION proposed action involves a seventeen ( 17) lot subdivision of a The 105. 6 acre site referenced on Suffolk County Tax Map.'#1000-116-1-3 Town of Southold, New York. The subject site is located along the south side of Main Street (NYS Route 25) approximately 1, 100 feet west Linden Avenue, and is zoned R-80. The application includes a 37.46 acre parcel offered by purchase to the Town of Southold for ce park, two (2) agricultural lots of 18.84 use as a cultural resour and 11. 96 acres placed under voluntary conservation easements and proposed as vineyards, an equestrian lot comprised of 5. 67 acres and thirteen (13) lots proposed for residential single family housing with lot sizes ranging from 80,300 to 166,400 square feet. The site is currently used for agricultural purposes and the balance is undeveloped woodlands. Proposed access is by. New Suffolk Avenue for the southerly equestrian/agricultural and residential lots and from Main Road (NYS 25) for the northerly proposed park and the second agricultural site. - Z MA 7• # S LProject Acc. No. Subject u a q &x Sheet No. of m('jla0[l � Zi-G,417wdg �a &a F L�• Date,T! 19 P Comp. Check Cont. No. Alk- l'-1-11M //7 2S 5-87 5-87 Maguire Group Architects/Engineers/Planners,P C. 3237 Route 112 Medford,NY 11763 Telephone 516/696-6007 Fax 516/696-6054 July 11, 1995 New York State National Heritage Program 700 Troy-Schnectady Road U. . t Latham, New York 12110-2400 GAP RE: Indian Shores at Cutchogue, Southold Suffolk County, New York Dear Sirs: We are preparing a DEIS for the above referenced property and are requesting information on wildlife and vegetation types that may be regarded as threatened or endangered and may exist on site. Please contact me if you have any questions, I called and left a message on July 10, 1995. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, MAGUIRE GROUP Architects/Engineers/Planners, P.C. Je frey L. Seeman, REM/REA/CEI/CEP Environmental Director JLS ms Enc. A New York Professional Service Corporation in Association with Maguire Group Inc. GH A l=S R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 180 OLD Govw RY ROAD(RTE. 58) P.O.BOX 1547 PaN EaM A D,NY 11901 ADJACENT TO TEL:(516)369-8200 MOTOR PEMCLE DEPARTAIENT FAX:(516)369-9080 February 15, 1994 Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman Maguire Group 3237 Route 112 Medford, New York 11763 Re: Subdivision for William J. Baxter Indian Shores - Cutchogue - Town of Southold Dear Mr.- Seeman: For your information, I am enclosing correspondence just received from the Southold Planning Board which includes various correspondence received from interested parties. Before proceeding further, please check with either myself or Mr. Baxter to determine what direction our efforts should take at this time. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ejc Enclosures cc: Mr. William J. Baxter SUEFOlt k�oG =�0 tk o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � ,= SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G.Ward.Chairman O1i Supervisor George Ritchie Latham.Jr. ��l �� Town Hall.53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 Mark S.McDonald Southold.New York 11971 Kenneth L.Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOU HOLD February 8, 1994 Charles Cuddy Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Scoping Session for Indian Shores SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 Dear Mr. Cuddy: At the February 1 scoping session, you received an outline of the scoping session. Please use it as a guide when compiling the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of this outline are being sent to all the coordinating agencies that have been participating in the review of these applications. If any Of these agencies want additional information to be added to the summary outline, you will be so notified. I have enclosed copies of correspondence received to date from involved agencies and interested parties for your review. If there are any questions or objections about the outline, please call me. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner encs. -- -- �,I 194 G/�r•�-r s - C uz �r 7&t4ou.) 10 A AA� Ali y 7 3 0 3 wna. woman-._ o God Anse/&#71%; 7 -6-ZQ-Z-;,-e2 TL)V,,76 ------- --- --�,� ��y v V, C,ci C, ro 0 V- Ck) -7 —--------- .l �0t.;l`1TY OF SUFFOLK �Y. s ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLX COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OP HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. Hmaereo. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER January 7, 1994 Melissa Spiro Southold Pl--Ultlirg Bortrd Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 i( Soutl)oki,x'`;ew York 11971 f RZ: IneNwa Silo.,.s i'1/ljor ste' ' /isiar, II scT:��: 10UQ-1 i6-1-i3 DI_ar Ms. Scir<j: Til- Su =e,fCcuclt�r Dept. of Heallb ServtGes (`.'7.C�DHS) has received SQIls lCtte• dltttj :� g 1 xj . , /�Isr. e!731T1 the ^I)nv`-referenced project and offers the foIlov itlg co;lul)ents. no 3L;ecti():1 to your uestattdiion as lead i ency, : 9 ►fie �LF1�.2tt ti:it tf;e pi1IT:2ti3I i:i':l),tC25 a-ssociated with the proposed 11ndidil Sllo.[es Subdivision l-c severe and in tinny in,!zranceS quite in-eversible. Our recommendation is therefore, this. the Town issue 3 pc1)i,1,m declaration and at a illiili,ltum require the applic,u:t to prepare a Draft Etaviros?,;zenll! i,:;f?apt w eirent (DE.IS). Development of*Ll;e enviromnentaijy sensitive parcel of land may also irlp,:ict unique habitat 6r enuy:gered a.'lIl threatened species, and cause disturbatice to ctlit(tr;=ly si ;rcli,t ns;,urccs. Zsues that should be al.►(h?ssed in tl:e DEIS i;lclu(,Ae preservation of ope11 space and the character o¢ the cot11t11t!t1itypoterltial bllpacts tc grou ;;/ate. mild ' r^ svr(ice ,v,Ir;rs, stonmo-rater runo,Tand drainage f:np,-% is as well as aItenlatives. We bc;ie.-e t::e Cun)ti;ttive imr(tcts or the propr,Scd uctivitY i;t this ,area sftuulci be carefully far - ' _ t1t alai ,igtlte4 pi:uulirg effort to 21lu'a1 the Towle to Lest til,tn:i3e its lCci�icrr't�a �c:fl`r� t�` "1 �cr such pl:u)t)�-ig 1;as passed. O.v,.^Ion cr t C0104n CC:�tER „ RIVCIt"C.AO K.Y. I:9Jr.3J97 _-. S,r! est-z I� -r . tJ S .. _ _ 1 t_ Ls t =. �— A 4 Letter to Meli*sa $p___ Januar l ?age 2 TIIIJA you for the oppo;tunky tv review tjlis ap_,nlication. if you have any questions,please feel free to Com_ict the Of ce of Ecology at -652-201,8. Sincerely Yours, Kbnberly Shaw s Sr. Envirownental A naly;t KS/amf Office of Ecology cc: Vito ItjitlL-i, P.E. SL pl, n Costa, F.E. Fratik Cowling, SC Planning f SUFFOLK COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION AD NASSAU COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMITTEE - INCCRPORATED UNDER NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW P.O. Drawer AR, Stony Brook, New York 11790 (516) 929-8725 . (516) 671-6641 February 1, 1994 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Ward and Members of the Planning Board, Re: Indian Shores Major Subdivision File # P 1473800-0015 Scoping Session In reference to the DEIS that will be prepared for the proposed development, Indian Shores SCTM #1000-115-1-B, given the great significance and integrity of the Fort Corchaug site, the SCAA Board of Trustees recommend the following: 1) The Cultural Resource Investigation should be done to a high standard, with the goal of preserving the integrity of the fort site and related sites. 2) Thorough Stage la and lb, and Stage 2 Surveys should be done, with maximum attention given to identifying other sites in the project area which will be impacted by the plan, including prehistoric components, Contact period and historic components. 3) Once the sites have been defined, a clear plan for documentation of these resources should be carried out. 4) A well thought out Mitigation Plan should be developed to lessen the impact to this important archaeological site and associated sites. .5) The proposed archeological work should be approved by - the lead agency and the NYSOPRHP. Changes to the plans arising from new information should be reviewed and approved before work is done. 6) The terrain should be surveyed to document any earthworks that may be associated with the fort. 7) Attention should be given to the historic homestead on the property. It should be documented by a qualified architectural preservation consultant. Recommendations regarding its demolition should be carefully considered. Page Two Indian Shores 8) During any site work, professional archaeologists should be present, and given the authority to stop excavation of roads and foundations if cultural materials are encountered. 9) Impacts to the archaeological remains of the prehistoric settlement pattern along the west bank of this creek will occur under this plan, and should be carefully _ assessed. The settlement pattern is composed of prehistoric sites representing different activity areas, including, for example, the remains of village sites, camp sites, food procurement sites, and mortuary remains. 10) The impact of the proposed construction to the historic character of the area should be considered. Every effort should be made to minimize the impact of the proposed development on the archeological resources. These resources include: known and unknown prehistoric sites that exist on the property; the fort site itself; sites associated with the period of significance of the fort; possible remains of Native American horticulture; any historic sites, including the homestead, that exist there. Potential impacts to these resources should be predicted and a mitigation plan should be developed as information becomes available. Archaeological resources are non-renewable. This project will have a considerable impact on those remaining on this property. The best position would be to preserve the site and its related sites undisturbed. Mitigation should be achieved by changing the density of the proposed construction and siting of house lots, using easements, or preserving the property as a whole. Sincerely, 'Suzaff Smy h Habib Corresponding Secretary SUFFOLK COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION p,C3 NASSAU COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMMITTEE 41) INCORPORATED UNDER NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LACY P.O. Drawer AR, Stony Brook, New York 11790 (516) 929-8725 • (516) 671-6641 January 7, 1994 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Ward and Members of the Planning Board, Re: Indian Shores Major Subdivision SCTM#1000-115-1-B The Board of- Trustees of the Suffolk County Archaeological Association would like to comment on the proposed development of the 105.6 acre property on the west side of Downs Creek, named Indian Shores (aka Fort Corchaug) . As part of the Lead Agency Coordination Process on this Type I action under SEQR, we want to clarify that Fort Corchaug is National Register site CU-61, and that the answer to question #6 on the Full EAF should be yes, the project area is contiguous to and contains a site listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. In Part 2, Project Impacts, Impact on Historic and Archaeological Resources, the answers to all parts of question 12 should be yes. Under Other impacts: impact to the archaeological remains of the prehistoric settlement pattern along the west bank of this creek will occur under this plan. The settlement pattern is composed of prehistoric sites representing different activity areas associated with the period of significance of the fort, including a will a2e sitefood procurement sites, mortuary remains, as we as of er types of sites. Given the great significance and integrity of the Fort Corchaug site, we request that a high quality Cultural Resource Investigation be done, with thorough Stage la and ib, and Stage 2 Surveys, with maximum attention to identifying other sites in the project area which will be impacted by the plan. Once the sites have been defined, a .clear plan for documentation of these resources should be carried out. A well thought out Mitigation Plan should be developed to lessen the impact to this important archaeological site. During any site work, professional archaeologists should be present, and given the authority to stop excavation of roads and foundations if cultural materials are encountered. We would like to emphasize, however, that archaeological resources are a non-renewable resource. Once gone, they are gone forever. The best position to take would be to preserve the site in situ, as it is. Native American forts are rare on Long Island, and the information contained in them is extremely important to Page Two Indian Shores our understanding of the prehistoric and Contact Period inhabitants of the North Fork and Long Island. The Secretary of the Interiors Standards, #8, states that "Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. " Specifically for this plan, we recommend that: 1) the terrain be surveyed to document any earthworks that may be associated with the fort. 2) the 5.4 acre area including the fort be increased to include the land to the south, which may contain the remains of the village site. 3) Lots #4 through #18 be reconsidered, since it is likely that the area along the creek will contain significant prehistoric archeological remains. 4) Lots #9 through 114 be reconsidered since Lots #9 and #10 are only 30 feet away from the wall of the fort, and Lots #13 and #14 are only 62 feet away. It is inconceivable that a house lot could be made so near to a Archaeological Site listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 5) allowance for surface disturbance, such as plowing, not be given as a reason for excluding some areas from investigation, since artifacts may be found deeper than the depth of a plow. Artifacts were found as deep as 3 feet, at sites in East Moriches, located all along the west bank of a creek, representing three different prehistoric occupations of the same resource zone. Artifacts associated with the Shinnecock Fort were found at depths of 4.5 feet, with the remains of earthworks. 6) the integrity of the site be kept intact. All efforts to preserve the site and its related sites should be made. The Fort Corchaug Archaeological Site is extremely significant for its integrity and rarity, and for the information it contains concerning the prehistoric inhabitants on Long Island. It is important to carefully assess the impacts the proposed project will have on this site and take steps toward mitigation, possibly by redesign, the use of easements, or preservation. AcSierely, uzan Smyth Habib Corresponding Secretary P�eep,TION All y tips a m Ay — o a New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Imo-+ r� Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau NEW YORK STATE � Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Orin Lehman Commissioner December 23, 1993 Mr. Richard G. Ward Chairman, Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Ward: Re: SEQRA Indian Shores Subdivision Southold, Suffolk County 93PR2466 The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received the documentation you provided on your project. As the state agency responsible for the coordination of the State's historic preservation programs, including the encouragement and assistance of local preservation efforts, we offer the following comments. The OPRHP has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status for this project. Please consider this agency as an interested party in this review. The proposed Indian Shores Major Subdivision contains multiple known archeological sites. Therefore, it is our very strong recommendation that an archeological survey be conducted for this parcel. Attached is a list of qualified archaeologists. Please note that if any State Agency is involved in this undertaking, it is appropriate for that agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition, if there is any federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations, "Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR 800, require that agency to initiate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) . An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency ��Panted o recycled paper Mr. Richard G. Ward December 23, 1993 Page 2 If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please call me at (518) 237-8643, ext. 280. Sincerely, ' , l W"V44A- kes Warren gram Analyst Field Services Bureau JPW:gc Attachment: "A Word About Archeological Surveys" P�GipEPT10N.h,�s,o y $ .c o o_ m New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation u Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau jEwroaKSTATE = Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Orin Lehman Commissioner A Word About Archeolocical Survevs The nature and extent of archeological resources in a project area, if any, are most efficiently determined by a two-step process. First, it is necessary to determine whether archeological resources actually exist in your project area- As stated in the Office of Parks, Recreat}on and Historic Preservation's cover letter, there is a likelihood based on known sites in the immediate vicinity, that archeological resources may be present in your specific project area. Generally, a qualified archeologist, as defined by the Department of Interior's Standards, will conduct a literature and file search to define which specific types of cultural resources are likely to be encountered. Following this, the archeologist will conduct a field investigation in which subsurface testing will be the major component, unless the presence or absence of resources can be determined by direct observation. Surveys of this nature can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of- way or by- the nur-.er of acres impacted and we encourage you to contact a number of consultants to obtain the best product. If sites have been identified, it is then necessary to conduct a more detailed site examination study of each resource. The purpose of this study will be to answer the cuestion: is this particular archeological site significant enough to meet the criteria for Listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places? The extent of this more detailed investigation is dependent upon the type of archeological site under consideration. The following is a list of archeological contractors who wish to be considered for such work in P(aw York State and who have submitted documentation Which demonstrates that they meet the qualit-iCations of the National Park Service's 36 CFR 61. The list is provided as a convenience only and suggested additions are always welcome. The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of Interior. However the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or products constitute endorsement or recommne:dation by the Department of the Interior. The activity has been administered by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Services. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. ` An Equal Cpportunity/Allirmadve Action Agency Ci p.inted On iecYUed paper CONTRACTORS FOR A_?CHEOLOGICAL SUT-wzyS Page 2 NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE/FA-X Bruce Aumert Archeological Services (614) 268-2514 Flora Church Consultants, Inc. Lori Frye 4620 Indianaola Avenue Shaune M. Skinner Columbus, 04 43214 Christopher Stevenson Prehistoric Archeology � Historic Archeology Janice Artemel Engineering-Science Inc. (202) 775-3495 Prehistoric Archeology 1133-15th Street, N d (FAX) 775-3446 Historic Archeology Washington, DC 20005-2701 Thomas R. Baker, Ph.D. Carrow & Associates, Inc. (412) 532-1860 Prehistoric Archeoloy 1101 Ligonier Street (:AY) 532-1863 Historic Archeology P.O. Box 919 _ Latrobe, Pennsylvania 15650-0919 Kenneth J. Basalik CW-11S Inc. (215) 699-8006 Prehistoric Archeology 403 E. Walnut Ave. Historic Archeology North Wales, PA 19454 David Bernstein/Linda Barber Institute for Long Island (516) 632-7615 Prehistoric Archeology Regional Archeology Historic Archeology Departm=ent of Anthropology State University of New York Stony Brack, NY 11794-4364 Connie Cox Bedner, Ph.D. Research Division (716) 271-4320 Prehistoric Archeology Rochester Museum & Science Center Ext. 345 657 East Avenue, Box 1480 (FAX) 271-5935 Rochester, NY 14603-1480 Eugene J. Boesch P.=D M"1 Box 188 (914) 628-3826 Prehistoric Archeology Barrett Hill Road (914) 337-6993 Historic Archeology Mahopac, NY 10541 John R. Bozell Anthropology Department (402) 471-4789 Prehistoric Archeology Nebraska State Historical Soc. P.O. Box 82554 Lincoln, NE 68501 Sylvia C. Browne 199 Second Street (518) 274-6959 Historic Archeology Troy, NY 12180 Hetty Jo Brur+bach Associate Curator Office: (518) 442-5756 Prehistoric Archeology Anthropology Home: (518) 783-0346 Historic Archeology ,y Department of Anthrocology Social Sciences Building 0263 State University of New York Albany, NY 12222 CONTRACTORS FOR RRCHEOLCGZCnL SUp.7-yS Page 3 NAM=• ADDR=SS TELEPHONE/FAX Kirk Butterbaugh 428 West De lavan Avenue (716) 882-3584 Prehistoric A--cheology Buffalo, NY 14213 Historic Archeology Alfred Cammissa Tracker Archaeology Services (516) 321-1380 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 2916 Historic Archeology North Babylon, NY 11703 l John C. Carbonara Bu-F-Falo State College Prehistoric 1300 Elmwood Avenue Buffalo, NY 14222-1095 Ronald C. Carlisle, Ph.D. Michael Baker Jr. , Inc. (412) 269-2049 Willia:a Creighton Johnson Cultural Resources Section (FAX) 269-2048 Prehistoric Archeology Airport 04ffice Park Historic Archeology Building 3, 5th Floor _ 420 Rouse_ Road Coraopolis, PA 15103 Isabelle Champlin 110 Swarts Fall (814) 362-7623 Prehistoric Archeology U. o-F Pittsburg at Brad-Ford Bradford, Pl� 16701 Michael A. Cincuino, Ph.D. Pan-america.^. Consultants, Inc. (716) 685-4198 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 369, 5512 Broadway Historic Archeology Lancaster, NY 14086 Jay Cohen Enviro2lan Associates, Inc. (914) 454-1606 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 3479, Page Park Historic Archeology 2293 Manchester Road Poughkeeosie, NY 12603 Eduard V. Curtin 38 S. Main Street (518) 732-4489 Prehistoric Archeology Castleton, NY 12033 Historic Archeology Skidmore Archaeological Survey (518) 584-5000 Box 2214, Skidaore College Ext. 2592 Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 (F?Y) 584-3023 Jeanette Collamer Collamer & Associates, Inc. (518) 766-5387 Prehistoric Archeology 114 Gardner Hill Road Historic Archeology East Nassau, NY 12062 or 73 Dove Street (518) 426-9624 Albanv, NY 12210 (FAX) 420-4624 Garrett Cook North Country Research Services (315) 262-2120 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 276 Historic Archeology Hannawa Falls, NY 13647-0276 - r CONTRACTORS FOR A.RCHEOLCGICAL SURVEYS c Page 4 Nrl.*Le^. ADDRESS TELEPHONE/FAX Deborah Cox Public Archeology (401) 728-8780 Prehistoric Archeology Laboratory, Inc Historic Archeology 387 Lonsdale Avenue Pawtucket, RI 02860 Nancy Davis 407 Elk Street Prehistoric Archeology Albany, NY 12206 Historic Archeology Robert Dean/W. Barbour, Ph.D. Dean & Barbour Associates, Inc. (716) 885-0259 Prehistoric Archeology Archeological & Environmental (?AX) 883-1297 Historic Archeology Services 762 Auburn Avenue Buffalo, NY 14222-1417 Joseph Diamond Rd. 7, Box =0 (914) 338-0091 Prehistoric Archeology Kingston, N'. 12401 Historic Archeology John V. Dumont, Ph.D. 139 North U-ion St. , Apt. 7 (609) 397-3263 Prehistoric Archeology Lambertville, NJ 08530 James P. Dwyer 5705 Solway Street (412) 257-6020 Prehistoric Archeology Pittsburg, .: 15217 Historic Archeology April Fehr R. C:-ristoni:er Goodwin & (301) 694-0428 Prehistoric Archeology ASSOCT_ateS, Inc. (_: } 695-5237 Historic Archeology 635A Solarex Court Frederick, 2JD 21701 Gillian A. Flynn Flynr. Archeological Consultants (914) 635-1249 Prehistoric Archeology Hickman Estate, Route 44 Historic Archeology Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 Joan H. Geismar, Ph.D. 40 East 83rd Street (212) 734-6512 Historic Archeology New York, NY 10028 ^ (..:k{ ) 650-1521 Michael Gimigliano, Ph.D. P.O. Box 383 (201) 579-1847 Historic Archeology Newton, NJ 07860 Joel Grossman, Ph.D. Grossman and Associates, Inc. (212) 473-2259 Prehistoric Archeology 201 East 166th Street, 6th Floor (FA-X) 473-2595 Historic Archeology New York, NY 10003 Susan D. Grzybowski A tn_c:ology Department (516) 632-7620 Prehistoric Archeology SUXY at Stony Brcok Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364 Suzan S_ Habib Box 75, Meadowlark Lane (516) 725-0131 Prehistoric Archeology Sag Harbor, NY 11963 Hansen & Associates Apartment 3B (716) 773-9218 Prehistoric Archeology 2966 Grand Island Blvd. Grand Island, NY 14072 CONTRACTORS FOR ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEYS Page 5 NA.0 ADDRESS TELEPHONE/FAX Karen Hartgen Hartgen Archeological (518) 283-0534 Prehistoric Archeology Associates, Inc. (FAX) 283-6276 Historic Archeology 27 Jordan Road Troy, NY 12180 Robert J. Hasenstab Sagdon Environmental Assoc. (518) 439-8588 Prehistoric Archeology 3 Normanskill Boulevard Delmar, NY 12054 Charles Hayes/Brian Nagel Rochester Museum & Science (716) 271-4320 Prehistoric Archeology Center (FAX) 271-5935 Historic Archeology 657 East Avenue, Box 1480 Rochester, NY 14603 Janice Henke P.O. Box 173 Prehistoric Archeology Argyle, NY 12809 John Hotopo Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. (201) 678-1960 Prehistoric Archeology 100 Halsted Street Historic Archeology East Orange, NJ 07019 Richard Hunter Hunter Research, Inc. (609) 695-0122 Prehistoric Archeology 714 S. Clinton Avenue (r?:{} 695-0147 Historic Archeolcgy Trenton, NJ 08611 Jack B. Irion Archaeology Managers (412) 856-6400 Diane Beynon, Ph.D- GAI Consultants, Inc. (412) 373-4100 Prehistoric Archeology 570 Beatty Road Historic Archeology Monroeville, PA 15146 Stephen R. James, Jr. Underwater Archaeological (301) 373-4632 Historic Archeology Consortium 1980 Munson Road Memphis, TN 38134 Anne Marie Jensen SJS Archeological Services, Inc. (215) 272-3144 Glenn W. Sheehan Continental Business Center (215) 828-7381 Prehistoric Archeology Suite A-10 Historic Archeology Bridgeport, PA 19405 or ! 386 Middle Road (518) 884-9259 Ballston Spa, NY 12020 Ed Johannemann Long Island Archaeology Project (516) 727-3527 Prehistoric Archeology Oak Drive Historic Archeology Calverton, NY 11933 Neil Johnson .z Headwaters Environmental Services Prehistoric Archeology R.D. 2 Box 688 (814) 228-3337 Historic Archeology Genesee, PA 16923 ` CONTRACTCRS FOR 4&-�CH-70LCGICAL SURtlEyS Page 6 NAKE ADDRESS TELZPHOPTZ/FAX Robert Kalin Archeological Services Inc. (516) 744-8047 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 5122 (FAX) 744-6617 Rocky Point, NY 11778 or Suffolk County Community College Selden, NY 11778 (516) 451-4354 1 Barry Kass BTK Associates, Inc. (914) 457-3039 Prehistoric Archeology 952 West Kaisertown Road (FAX) 692-8919 Montgomery, NY 12549 David B. Kieber Ken W. Kloeber Consulting Eng. (716) 941-5544 Prehistoric Archeology 8397 Boston State Road Historic Archeology Boson, NY 14025 Cece Kirkorian/Besty Kearns Historical Perspectives - (203) 698-1147 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 331 (FAQ{) 6918-1147 Historic A-rcheology Riverside, CT 060878 Joel Klein, Ph.D. EBASCO Services Inc. (201) 460-5907 Sydne Marshal, Ph.D. 160 Chubb Avenue ret 450-0525 Prehistoric Archeology Lyndhurst, NJ 07071 Historic Archeology Stephanie R. Koramov City/Sca-ne: Cultural Resource (713) 965-3350 Prehisto_ic ArcPneolcgy Consultants Historic Archeology 725 Carroll Street Brooklyn, NY 11215 Lucianre Lavin, Ph-D. Archaeological Research Spec. (203) 883-8397 Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 612 Oxford, CN 06483 Edward Len-;k Sheffield Archeo. Consultants (.201) 492-8525 Prehistoric Archeology 24 High Street Historic Archeology Butler, NJ 07405 Christopher Lindner, Ph.D. Hudsonia Ltd. (914) 758-6822 Prehistoric Archeology Bard College Ext. 363 Historic Archeology Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504 Barbara J. Little, Ph.D. Daces & Moore (301) 652-2215 Prehistoric Archeology 7101 Wisconsin Avenue (Fdz:C) 656-8059 Historic Archeology Suite 700 Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4870 Mark S. LoRusso 12 Russell Road (518) 459-6813 Prehistoric Archeology .y Albany, NY 12203 Historic Archeology Ann Mabe, Ph.D. RD 2, Box 1030 (717) 549-8173 Prehistoric Archeology Mansfield, PA 16933 CONTRACTORS FOR ARCHEOLOGT_C,'%_. SURV?YS Page 7 NAM.. ADDRESS TELEPHONE/FA_X Ellis McDowell-Loudan, Ph.D. Soc/Anthro. Dept. (607) 753-2485 Prehistoric Archeology Box 2000, SUNY College Historic Archeology Cortland, NY 13045 Jo-Ann McLean Jo-Ann McLean Archeological (516) 887-2430 Prehistoric Archeology Consultants Historic Archeology 4 Dunne Place Lynbrook, NY 11563 Charles L. Miller, II Butterbaugh & Miller Archeo. (716) 836-3906 Prehistoric Archeology Consultants, Inc. (716) 882-3584 Historic Archeology 428 West Delavan Avenue Buffalo, NY 14213 Robert Miller, Ph.D. Archeological Consultants (516) 757-6244 Janice Rees-Miller 594 Main Street (FAX) 7S7-6113 Prehistoric Archeology Northport, NY 11768 Historic Archeology R. Joseph Murphy 112 Glenview Parkway (315) 408-5070 Prehistoric Archeology Syracuse, NY 13219 Historic Archeology Daniel Myers Epochs Past (301) 257-3264 Prehistoric Archeology 339 Fairhaven Road Historic Archeology Dunkirk, MD 20754 Brian L. Nage'_ Rochester Museum & Science (716) 271-4320 Prehistoric Archeology Center Ext. 353 Historic Archeology Research Division (FAX) 271-5935 657 East Avenue, Box 1480 Rochester, NY 14603 Ben Nelson Archeological Survey (716) 636-2297 Prehistoric Archeology SUNY Buffalo - (FAX) 636-3808 Historic Archeology Buffalo, NY 14261 Thomas W. Neumann Public Archaeology (315) 470-6552 Prehistoric Archeology 404-9 Ivy Ridge Road 463-8434 Historic Archeology Syracuse, NY 11210 r Donna I. Ottusch-Kianka 62 Dubois Ave. (516) 674-9867 Prehistoric Archeology Sea Cliff, NY 11579 Historic Archeology Stephen Oberon Heritage America Ltd. (914) 341-2353 Prehistoric Archeology Suite 144, 521 Route 211 E. Historic Archeology ,� Middletown, NY 10940 CONTRACTORS FOR ARCFiEOLCGICAI. SQRI'_YS Page 8 NAIX AJORESS TELEPHONE/F;LX Peter Pagoulatos, Ph.D. Cultural Resource Consulting (201) 985-4380 Prehistoric Archeology Grouo (FAX) 985-5989 Historic Archeology 54 Woodbridge Avenue Highland Park, NJ 08904 Philip A. Perazio Kittatinny Archeological (717) 476-7829 Prehistoric Archeology Research Design, Inc. Historic Archeology P.O. Box 1117 Stroudsburg, PA 18360 or 509 Third Street Brooklyn, NY 11215 Arnold Pic'kman East 566th Szreet (212) 935-0123 Prehistoric Archeology New York, NY 10022 Historic Archeology - Carolyn Pierce Pretz & Huta Associates �' . (7_6) 633-4344 Prehistoric Archeology 60 _=-hart Drive (FLK) 633-4940 Historic Archeology Willi- sville, NY 14221 Marjorie Pratt Pratt & Pratt (315) 687-9441 Prehistoric Archeology 6156 Ridge_ Road, RD 4 Historic Archeology Caz=_novia, NY 13035 Michael Rater P.a`er Associates (203) 633-9025 Prehistoric Archeology 81 Dayton Road, P.O. Box 466 Historic Archeology Soutc Glastonbury, CT 06073 John L. Reese 180 South Firth Avenue (315) 866-0300 Prehistoric Archeology Ilion, NY 13357 Daniel G. Roberts John Milner Associates, Inc. (215) 436-9000 John P. McCarthy 309 North Matlack Street (FAX) 436-9000 Historic Archeology West Chester, PA 19380 Thomas L. Struthers Robert G. Kingsley Janes A. Robertson Prehistoric Archeology or or , Anne S. Dowd John Milner Associates, Inc. (203) 798-93662 Prehistoric Archeology 39 Mill Plain Rd. , Suite 9 Lauren J. Cook Danbury, CT 06811 Historic Archeology William I. Roberts IV Green'-ouse Consultants, Inc. (212) 514-9520 Prehistoric Archeology 54 Stene Street Historic Archeology .� . Penthouse Suite New Ycrk, NY 1CO04 . . ,' .• Page 9 ADDRESS TELEPHONE/FAX Mark Rosenzweig, Ph.D. Ecology and Environment, Inc. (716) 684-8060 ' -• Prehistoric Archeology 368 Pleasantview Drive (FAX) 684-0844 Historic Archeology Lancaster, NY 14086 Barbara Ross RD 1, Box 226A (518) 966-4284 Prehistoric Archeology Westerlo, NY 12193 Historic Archeology Nan Rothschild Barnard College ` (212) 854-4315 Prehistoric Archeology 606 West 120 Street Historic Archeology New York, NY 10027 Karen Rubinson, Ph.D. Key Perspectives (212) 865-2102 Prehistoric Archeology 250 West 100th Street (FAX) 932-8587 Historic Archeology Ballroom Suite New York, NY 10025 David J. Rue Archaeological and Historical (814) 364-2135 Conray Hay, Ph.D. Consultants, Inc. - Christopher A. Bergman lC1 North Pennsylvania Avenue Prehistoric Archeology P.O. Box 482 • Historic Archeology Centre Hall, PA 16828 Laurie W. Rush, Ph.D. P.O. Box 177 Prehistoric Archeology Clayton, NY 13624 Historic Archeology Eduard Rutsch Historic Conservation and (201) 383-6355 Historic Archeology Interpretation., Inc. Rd 3 Box 120 Newton, NJ 07860 William Sandy 53-2 Garden View Terrace (605) 443-3247 Prehistoric Archeology East Windsor, NJ 08520 Historic Archeology Joseph Schuldenrein, Ph-D. President/Principal Archeologist (212) 601-3861 Prehistoric Archeology Geoarcheology Research Associates 5912 Spencer Avenue Riverdale, NY 10471 Gary D. Shaffer, Ph.D. R. Christopher Goodwin & Assoc. (301) 694-0428 Prehistoric Archeology 636A Solarex Court Historic Archeology Frederick, F10 21701 M. Lisa Spaulding Spaulding CR.0 (716) 877-6297 Prehistoric Archeology 147 Irving Terrace Historic Archeology Tonawanda, NY 14223 David R. Starbuck, Ph.D. 10 Riverside Street, Apt. 2 (518) 747-2925 Prehistoric Archeology ry Fort Edward, NY 12828 Historic Archeology ti • CONTRACTORS FOR ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEYS Page 10 NALHZ ADDRESS TyLEP&ONE/F A.Y Michael Stewart Dept. of Anthropology (215) 982-9145 Prehistoric Archeolcgy Gladfelter Hall, Temple Univ. Philadelphia, PA 19122 Martha Symes SINM Prehistoric Archeolcgy 780 Riverside Dr. Apt. IG New York, NY 10032 Ronald Thomas MAAR Associates (302) 368-5777 Prehistoric Archeolcgy 9 Liverty Plaza (FAX) 368-1571 Historic Archeology P.O. Box 655 Newark, DE 19715-0655 or P.O. Box 131 (201) 225-9118 Columbia, NJ Nina Versaggi SUNY Binghamton (607) 777-4786 Prehistoric Archeology Public Archeology Facility (FA:0 77.7-4000 Historic :archeology Bingha---ton, NY 13901 Ernest A. Weigand II Norwalk Community College (203) 227-6643 Prehistoric Archeolcgy Route 136 (203) 853-2040 Historic Archeology Norwalk, CT 06854 Michael R. Werner 40-3 Wocdla;ca Road (518) 442-4050 Historic Archeology Albany, NY 12203 442-4044 Slobodanka Umetich Werner 869-1313 Prehistoric Archeolcgy Historic Archeology Anthony Wonderley Atlantic Testing Laboratories (315) 735-3305 Prehistoric Archeolcgy 698 Stevens Street (315) 386-4578 Historic Archeology Utica, NY 13502 BF:tr 10/06/93 WOSS14 :y. B) Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology 1. Fish and Wildlife List all wildlife present on this site and in adjacent areas. Describe site' s habitat value. Identify any endangered species that may be present, describe their habitat range and needs. Include the osprey (T) and diamondback terrapin (SC) as identified in the 1987 Department of State Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat rating form. Discuss the role that Downs Creek plays as a nursery for shellfish and finfish for the Peconic Bay. Discuss shellfishing opportunities in the creek. Discuss the fact that this creek has never been dredged. 2. Vegetation Describe vegetation types on-site, discuss their value as habitat. List any rare plants found on-site or im adjacent areas. - Discuss potential impacts from fertilization and erosion. Discuss using native plant species and species that require little or no fertilization and/or irrigation in all landscaping. 3. Wetlands Describe wetlands found on-site. Discuss wetlands benefits found in tidal wetlands. Discuss their habitat value and value to wildlife. III. Land Use and Zoning Discuss any and all planning initiatives that -apply to this site. Include the US/UK Stewardship Exchange Program and its recommendations for Southold, particularly their recommendations regarding the Peconic Bay and tourism. Include the benefits of ensuring that water quality is maintained or enhanced so that multiple uses (shellfishing and boating) can co-exist. Discuss the BT CAMP Study and its recommendations. Also discuss Southold' s Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan and how this project complies with these initiatives. Discuss 'the Peconic' s inclusion in the National Estuary Program. Describe the Program' s goals and objectives. Discuss any additional designations that apply to this site including but not limited to: Significant Coastal Fish & Wildlife Habitat, Critical Environmental Area, and Coastal Barrier Resources. r f T 0 0 1P46r169_ NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC. MIS /1125 SEQRA Scoping Prepared by Indian Shores Sherry Johnson Route 25, Cutchogue Program Director Planning Board, Town of Southold February 1 , 1994 The North Fork Environmental Council would like to see the following issues addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement which is to be prepared for the Indian Shores subdivision. I. Description of proposed action Include a description of the project and describe the setting including, surrounding community, adjacent land uses, uplands and tidal wetlands found on the property. Discuss public need for the project, include discussion on pending subdivisions within the Town. II . Environmental Setting A) Water resources Describe the ground and surface water qualities found on-site, and discuss the quantity and quality of the water. Discuss groundwater, include characteristics of the aquifers on- site, depth to water table and any seasonal variation. Identify method of providing drinking water, determine projected water consumption for both residential and agricultural uses, and describe water conservation plans. Discuss Downs Creek , include project impact on creek and Peconic Bay. Discuss current value of the creek for recreation, and for finfish and shellfish production. Discuss potential for flooding, discuss the creek's designation as a Coastal Barrier Resource. Discuss erosion and eutrophication. Describe current drainage patterns and the proposed drainage scheme and any runoff control measures. Describe the proposed sanitary system. Discuss potential impact on wetlands, creek and bay. Sc�FiCL—" 1+107 (8 871—Wa NEW YORK STATF DFPART.Nttvf OF r,1.kONXWNIAL CO-NM RVANON IN) r—R-OFFICE SPEED MEMO /qs(l RFCUl ATOR) VF,vRS (USE ONLY FOR UNOFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE) TO: (e /.5370, J n ^:� DATE. FROM: IY SUBJECT: f ' lr OCtbdii-ittftrAT BOTTOM OF THIS FORM l Cit}U - //G; / — L �Vt I -f- Q\, [CCc. Ur> C--, �1e�ciS �;�� • r REPLY I - ��/"' L.�: :1 ' `vim r,. f.• PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G. Ward.Chairman George Ritchie Latham.Jr -__' Town Hall. Main Cto: Bennett Orlowski.Jr. _ P.1. Box 1179 53095 MMai n Mark S.McDonald - "' ' Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 1197 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516) 765- 1823 --------TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I utu 15 t Rea r12.,,4' RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under (State Environmental y Article 8 ' Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental ± Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: i 1. Your ` I jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities agency, and les of lead ± j 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. i J Enclosed please find a copy of the 11 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assistsal and a completed You in your response. Project Name: t , =nc�:a�n Sho�cS /V�4 ac 'w �o�n i Requested Action: r a�nr Sc��c��ws;or� o+ IOS.Q acYc t�rce� „��-a ' ya. lots. SEQRA Classification: ( >C ) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: - rn l,s�a 0P1Rp (516) -76b-1938 i IV. Traffic Discuss access to the site. Discuss existing traffic conditions on New Suffolk Avenue. Discuss current traffic generated by facility and any projected increase in traffic. Discuss any impacts to adjacent wetlands, and drainage and runoff containment plans. V. Cultural Resources A) Archaeological Discuss Ft. Corchaug. Discuss site' s inclusion on the National Register of Historic Place;: Fully discuss the archaeological significance of this site, include information on all previous archaeological studies done. Describe, in detail, the archaeological work to be completed for this project, identify who will be completing the work. The entire site should be subject to archaeological investigation. B) Visual Describe scenic views and their importance. Discuss how this project will impact vistas along New Suffolk Avenue, on the creek and the bay. VI . Alternatives The NFEC would like to see the following alternatives to the proposal addressed in the Impact Statement. A) Clustered subdivision, at allowed yield, on 1 acre lots. B) No action. C) Public acquisition of entire site. APPENDIX 8 PRELIMINARY REPORT EAST END ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE r Preliminary Report to GOVERNOR MARIO M. CUOMO by THE EAST END ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE 7 November 22, 1993 a Recommendation #22: The Land Acquisition Partnership Between the State and Local Governments Should be Expanded d ' Alkw Background: The continued State, County and local Open Space acquisition programs are essential to the economic and environmental future of the East End. There are 8,987 areas of State-owned land on the East End. The 1992 New York - State Open Space Plan specifically identifies more of the East End's landscapes and natural resources as needing protection. Suffolk County has already invested$200 million in watershed protection and$65 million in farmland preservation. Local towns have invested more than$40 million in local land acquisition initiatives in the last 15 years. They have done so with broad voter support because of the public understanding that protection of a high-quality environment, outstanding recreational opportunities,rural character and scenic beauty across the East End make this region special and unlike any other in the New York metropolitan area. If the ��. East End loses its unique sense of place, the industries which hinge upon the above fir`, attributes would be imperiled. According to Edward T. McMahon,Senior Associate at the Conservation Fund and Aro former President of Scenic America "Tourism involves much more than marketing. It also involves making destinations more appealing. This means conserving and enhancing a destination's natural tourism assets. It is, after all,the heritage, culture and natural beauty of a community or region that attracts tourism." See, Appendix K.) The East End of Long Island contains the highest concentrations of rare and endangered plants and animals in New York State.3 Although the five eastern towns and villages have implemented some of the most progressive and innovative planning techniques on the country,4 some parcels require full acquisition to preserve these sensitive features. In other words,any development of these parcels would cause irreparable harm to the features requiring protection. 3New York State Natural Heritage Program. 4These towns have a variety of programs including: purchase of development rights; transfer of development rights; mandatory cluster ordinances; wetlands setback ordinances; beach, dune and bluff protection ordinances; flood hazard regulations; coastal hazard regulations; historic districts; special groundwater protection regulations; harbor protection regulations (pending); tree protection ordinances; critical environmental area designations pursuant to SEQRA,zoning; subdivision and site plan ordinances;etc. -66- i{ "Greenways" are corridors of protected open space. No other conservation initiative provides so many ecological, economic and quality of life benefits to the communities that create them. Greenways not only protect environmentally important lands, they also link people with the natural world and outdoor recreational opportunities.5 Greenways and open space enhance property values, support local recreation-based businesses,6 enhance tourism, encourage relocation, and reduce public cost of unwise development.? Proposed Action by the Governor: A. Large Parcels Priority parcels listed below are all within the Peconic Pinelands Maritime Reserve cited in the State's 1992 Open Space Plan. We request that the Governor working with the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation develop a 5-year protection plan to accomplish the y preservation of the priority parcels. The plan would include an assessment of the degree of threat to each parcel and identify source of funds for each parcel including partnerships with town,county and federal government and non-profit conservation organizations. EAST HAMPTON TOWN Culloden - Named after the HM.S. Culloden, which sank off Montauk, this 275- acre parcel has outstanding views of Block Island Sound, wetlands, and the potential for an underwater park. The Sanctuary - 393 acres owned by ICR/Montauk. Resources values include: endangered species,wetlands,trails; logical addition to State park land. Shadmoor- 98 acres owned by Peter Schub and Robert Bear, Montauk,Resource values include: ocean access (swimming, surfing, fishing), trails, scenic views, federally endangered species,wetlands, historic importance. SOUTHAMPTON TOWN Cow Neck - 980 acres owned by Peter Salm, North Sea. Resource values include: bay access (swimming, boating, fishing), wetlands, wildlife concentrations, endangered species, consolidation of park land (adjacent to federal, town and Nature Conservancy lands), scenic views. 5The American Greenway Program-The Conservation Fund. 6Economic Impacts of Protecting Rivers,Trails and Greenway Corridors,National Park Service, 1990. American Greenways Program. ?More and more studies are showing that conserving open land and choosing carefully those areas that should be developed is not contrary to economic health but essential to it. Holly Thomas, Senior Planner, Dutchess County Planning Department. See, Appendix L. -67- Bridgehampton Racetrack - 518 acres owned by Robert M. Rubin. Resource values include: possible conversion of racetrack area to public golf course, water recharge. South Shore National Seashore Extension - Approximately 300 acres/various owners. Resource values include: ocean access (swimming), bay access (boating, shellfishing/fishing), endangered species, wildlife concentrations, scenic views, stone protection. 101RIVERHEAD TOWN Jamesport - 517 acres owned by LILCO. Resource values include: Long Island Sound access (swimming, boating, fishing), trails, historic and scenic views, farmland, buffer to Hallockville Farm Museum. Riverhead Hamlet - Approximately 65 acres comprised of small parcels aloe the south side of New York State Route 25, between Nugent Drive (a/k/a Center Drive)and Forge Road. Regulated pursuant to Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers designation. Resource values include: Peconic River access (boating, fishing), scenic vistas, wildlife _ habitats,enhancement of downtown area. Olin Warner, Peconic River - 30 Acres - 800 feet of Peconic Lake shorefront, provides public access for freshwater fishing, canoeing, and nature observance. W SOUTHOLD TOWN z� Robins Island - 445 acres owned by Southold Development Corp. Resource values include: bay access (swimming, boating, fishing),endangered species,historic and scenic views, trails, wetlands, environmental education. Y Orient Point Additions - Approximately 300 acres/numerous owners. Resource values include: addition to State and county park land, wetlands, endangered species, farmland, bay access (boating, swimming;fishing), historic and scenic views. Dam Pond - 114 acres. Resource values include: Long Island Sound access { (swimming, boating, fishing),ponds/wetlands,wildlife concentrations, scenic views. Fort Corchaug - 106 acres. Indian fort location. SHELTER ISLAND _k Groundwater recharge lands. Approximately 500+acres. Resource values include: groundwater recharge, trails, wetlands/ponds. Such parcels will be further identified �. pursuant to the Town's anticipated adoption of its first comprehensive plan. SOUTHAMPTONIEA T HAMPTON TOWNS COMBINED South Fork Morainal Woodlands (Paumanok Path connection) - Southampton/East Hampton Towns. Approximately 4,000 acres/numerous owners. Last concentrations of large blocks of land on the South Fork. Resource values include: groundwater recharge, trails, kettle holes ponds, forest preservation, and wildlife concentrations. This section includes: -68- .p. CENTRAL PINE BARRENS Southampton/Riverhead/Brookhaven Towns. Approximately 10,000 acres. Resource values include: water recharge, trails, endangered species, wildlife concentrations, wetlands/ponds,environmental education. -.-.F B. Small Parcels In addition to the large parcels identified for acquisition, there are numerous vacant ]h parcels,five acres or less in size,created prior to the adoption of zoning which are eligible for building permits without any subdivision. Some of these parcels are too constrained to construct a single-family residence,contain 100% wetlands,do not meet the State Tidal or Freshwater Wetland Regulations and/or do not meet the State and County Sanitary Code Regulations for construction. Yet, State DEC and Health Department Agencies often issues a permit to build on such a lot because a denial would amount to a taking. Rather than grant state permits to lots which should not be built upon, we recommend that the Governor make State funds available through the Environmental Protection Act and other available sources to provide for purchase of such properties.8 vTh's recommendation compliments Recommendation#24 (Enforcement of Tidal and Freshwater Wetland Laws Should be Delegated to Towns). -69- APPENDIX 9 SEQRA BACKGROUND DATA GiiAjui Fs A. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAw 180 Oim GouNTBY ROAD(RTE.58) P.O.BOX 1547 PjuvEH_F77r.pD,NY 11901 ADJACENT TO TEL:(516)369-8200 MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT FAX:(516)369-9080 May 4, 1995 Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman Maquire Group 3237 Route 112 Medford, New York 11763 Re: Baxter Subdivision -- Indian Shores Dear Mr. Seeman: I am enclosing the Resolution and supporting documents from the Southold Town Planning Board. Although it is my understanding that the scoping outline was to be reduced in minimal fashion by deleting one or two sections, that has not been done. We can address this at a later time. Based upon our discussion at the scoping session would you please proceed with the draft of the Environmental Impact Statement. It is my understanding that some of the information rquired may have been prepared by the Peconic Land Trust and I ask that you contact Tim Caufield to coordinate the information available from the Land Trust. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ejc Encs. cc: Mr. William Baxter Mr. Timothy Caufield c/o Peconic Land Trust �OguFF0t1r 'PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman CLOD 2 Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 0 P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald '�O,( �`a� Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 2, 1995 Charles R. Cuddy 130 Old Country Road P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Indian Shores Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 1, 1995: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Be it further RESOLVED that the Planning Board, as lead agency, finds that the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination of a Positive Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration and a copy of the comments received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. A summary outline of the scoping session that was held on April 19, 1995 and was concluded at the Planning Board's April 27, 1995 work session is enclosed also. Please use it as a guide when compiling the draft Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of this outline are being sent to all the coordinating agencies. If any of these agencies want additional information to be added to the summary outline, you will be so notified. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Since r �/ 24 Richar , WVar6eg Chairman 11"5 enc. �OgUFFO(,��o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ;i'ti�0 Gy Richard G.Ward, Chairmany - Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ; 4P.O.Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. y � � Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald '�Ol Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L Edwards r Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance May 1, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Major Subdivision Indian Shores SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 SEQR Status: Type 1 Description of Action: 17 lot subdivision on 105.6 acres including; a) A 36.47 acre parcel to be purchased by the Town of Southold for a cultural resources park, b) Two (2) agricultural lots of 18,84 and 11 .96 acres; c) An equestrian related lot of 5.67 acres, and d) Thirteen (13) single-family lots ranging in size from 80,300 to 166,400 square feet in area. Location: North side of New Suffolk Avenue and Southold side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25). Cutchogue, Town of Southold SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 Page 2 Indian Shores - Positive Declaration May 1, 1995 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The applicant has provided the lead agency with a Long Environmental Assessment Form. The LEAF has been reviewed by the Planning Board, the Planning Board's Environmental Consultant, and other involved agencies. The Indian Shores project is expected to have a potential significant impact particularly in view of site sensitivity regarding historic and archaeological resources, and wetlands, with related issues including open space and visual resource impacts. The project was reviewed by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). In a letter dated April 10, 1995, the OPRHP recommended that an archeological survey of the development site be conducted to identify archeological resources and to plan for avoidance or mitigation of possible impact to those resources. The Southold Town Planning Board has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of the impacts of the project, to obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and to research possible alternatives and mitigation measures. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro, Planner Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1938 A copy of this notice sent to: Albert Krupski, Board of Trustees Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Vito Minei, Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Roger Evans, NYSDEC, Stony Brook Langdon Marsh, NYSDEC, Albany Vito Lena, NYSDOT James Warren, OPRHP Public Bulletin Board INDIAN SHORES,CUTCHOGUE SF,QA SCOPING OUTLINE April 279,1995 The subject application was previously reviewed by the Planning Board as a Type I action involving a 42 lot major subdivision lying between Suffolk Avenue and Main Road, Catchogue. In review of the action,the Planmnp Board issued a Positive Declaration on January 10, 1994,thereby requiring the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(EISA A scoping session to determine the on one the h dD��EIS was conducted on February 1, 1994,and a scoping outline g Sthe licant amended the application to a projectinvol�Ie a 17 lot subdivision. mn includes a 37.47 acre parcel to be ,r h Sed Town of Southold for a cultural resources park,two(2)agricultural lots of 18.84 and 11.96 acres, an equestrian related lot of 5.67 acres in size, and thirteen(13) additional lots ranging in size from 80,300 to 166,400 square feet. In review of the amended map,the Planning Board consensus was that an EIS should beprepared for the 17 lot project,particularlY in view of site sensitivity regarding historic and archaeological resources, and wetlands,with related issues including open space and visual resource imps. A scoping meeting was conducted on April 19, 1995 with representatives of the Planning Board, CVA, and the applicant This outline provides a revised scoping fiirther deliberations with the Planning Board. ping meeting,input from the consultant an Overall,the P Board is seeking a detailed Description of the Proposed Project including documentation ol the following:background and history,location, design and layout,recharge handling,water supply,sanitary disposal►qquuaanntities of site coverage, site access,mechanisms for open space preservation,proposedtown parcel acquisition and site access. The Environmental Setting and Potential Significant Impacts section are required, with the understanding that resource evaluation,discission and analysis shall be concentrated on the proposeof resourceseacrnt�s�the site will be preons of the subject sented, 'fh a greaterd �Y,it is ected that an overview level of analysis on the southern portion of the site. Primary issues requiring in-depth environmental analysis remain as follows: cultural resource sensitivity,preservation of open space,visual resource impact, and potential impact on wetlands. Several alternatives have been proposed to address other scenarios regarding key resources. The following outline provides an updated form for the content and preparation of the Draft EIS for Indian Shores. TABLE OF CONTENTS AND SUMMARY A Table of Contents and a brief summary are required for the Draft EIS. The Table of Contents will include: A. Brief description of the action. issues of controversy must be specified). B. Significant,adverse and beneficial imps (' CRAMER, VO.ORHtS &-,-ASSOCIATES Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Indian Shores,Cutchogue Scoping Outline C mitigation measures propose& D. Alternatives considered. -- E. Matters to be decided(permits,approvals,status,funding). L DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. PROJECT PURPOSE,NEED AND BENEFITS L Background and History—ERstory of ownership,farming practices,extant structures, past use,and prior subdivision applications. 2 Public need for the project,and municipality objectives based on adopted community development plans—summar=municipal objectives from land use plan section, establish need for the project. 3. - O*ctivm of the p qed sponsor. 4. Benefits of the Action—Open space,housing,agricultural use,cultural resources. B. LOCATION L Establish geographic site boundaries—Provide location map. 2 Description of site access—Frontage on two roads,water access. 3. Description of existingg- C - - DESIGNAND IAYOU'T ._ L Total Site Area a) describe potential site use based on yield b) describe design iiaftires incorporated into amended map to address unique site resour. (i .design )- 2 Site Coverage Quantities—Use table to present budding,driveway,road,recharge, landscaping,natural area,and other Site coverage quantities. 3. Structures—Describe expected housing based on market demand. 4. Recharge—Present method of stormwater recharge,capacity and design requirements. 5. Sanitary Disposal—Describe sanitary disposal methods. 6, Water Supply—Ability to meet Article 4,private water system standards and water qty. 7. Open Space a) Detail Peconic Land Trust involvement,and open space preservation methods for agricultural sites. Include steps and procedures that must fall into place in order to accomplish land conservation and status of same. b) Detail method of complying with NYSDEC Part 661 Tidal Wetlands preservation of adjacent area' c) Detail proposal for Town acquisition.Include steps and procedures that must fall into place in order to accomplish land acquisition and status of same. D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION L Construction a) Anticipated period of construction. b) Schedule of construction activities—i.e. Wildlife sensitivity and wetlands resources. 2 Operation a) Management of open space lands b) Maintenance of roads,recharge,etc. E. APPROVALS L Permit approvals—Last agency,permit and status. CRAMER, VOORHIS &;ASSOCIATES Paget ENVIRONMENTALAND`P�fNtNG CONSULTANTS -t„i ow Indian Shores,Cutchogue Scoping Outline a) Town of Southold Plannmg,Board—subdivision b) Town of Southold Trustees—Wetlands if applicable and acquisition. c) Town of Southold—Variance if required for length of cul-de-sac. d) Suffolk County Department of Health Services water supply and sanitary disposal e) Other—List other agency permits required as applicable. nL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Natural Resources A. GEOLOGY L Subsurface a) composition and thickness of subsurface material-To depth of 17 feet or groundwater•,provide a summary of test hole information. 2- Surface a) List of soil types per Suffolk County Soul Survey. b) Discussion of soil cbaracteristics/hmitations c) Distribution of sod types at project site d) Identify important agricultural souls as a resource. 3. Topography a) Description of topography at Project site - Slopes-slopes ad*ent wetlands. - Interior site swales,prominent or unique features B. WATER RESOURCES L Groundwater a) Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas. - depth of water table in development areas. - seasonal variation. - discuss groundwater surface water inter-relationship;discharge to surface water•,tidal fluctuations. - determine--sting water quality beneath the site in anticipated water supply zones. - direction of flow b) Identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater - location of a-sting wells - public/private water supply - agricultural c) Groundwater/water management regulations-208 study,special groundwater protection areas,NURPS study,etc. 2- Surface Water a) Describe Downs Creek estuary—inlets/outlets. - NYSDEC surface water classification - water Quality and salinity - c3raracteristics and uses 3. Drainage describe a-sting drainage Patterns on site and is the area. make note of drainage swales and natural collection areas. C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY CRAMER, VOORHIS &;ASSOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENTAL ANG:PLANNING CONSULTANTS Indian Shores,Cutchogae Scoping Outline L Vegetation a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area; classify into habitats. b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics species presence and abundance - size - distribution - community types - unique,rare and endangered species value as babitat for wildlife c) Contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for information concerning unique vegetation,habitats or wWlife species on site or in the area,and provide discission/analysis in teat as necessary. d) Describe habitat needs and biological characir int=of all endangered species, threatened and species of special concern. 2, Wildlife a) Provide a list of wildlife mining site habitats or expected on site. Indicate dates of surveys and distinguish species identified on site. Consult references to determine species expected on site based on babit., type. b) Ccm Natural Heritage Program for file review of site and area. c) Identify Endangered,Threatened or Species of Special Concern. d) Describe habitat needs and biological characteristics of all endangered species, threatened and species of special concern. 3. Wetlands a) Describe wetlands and characteristia. b) Indicate method of delineation and agencies contacted for verification or agencies with jurisdiction. C) ldcati{y valuable functions of wetlands on site and adjacent site Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION L Traag services a) Dcs¢riptkm access to the site and internal road circulation. b) Description of current level of use of services. - a.m.and pm.peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mine source of C3dSdng traffic c) Make note of pedestrian environment and public transportation,if applicable. B. LAND USE AND ZONING L Fxdsting land use and zoning a) Description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area. b) Description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area- 1 Land use plans a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area. C. CObov1UNITY SERVICES L Educational facilities 2. Police protection %`I& CRAMER, VOORHtS &='ASSOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENTALAL ,PLANNING CONSULTANTS z :ca Indian Shores,Cutchogue Scoping Outline 3. Fire protection 4. Recreational fadities 5. Utilities D. CULTURAL RESOURCES L visual resources a) description of the physical character of the community b) description of site from viewsheds along Main Road,New Suffolk Avenue and Downs Creek. 2 Histom/ re-histonc Resources-Stage IA/B CRA a) Location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community,or included on Statewide Inventory. b) Determine significance of casting historic structures on-site—provide map and literature search,record architecture,use,photo documentation,etc c) Contact NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation,Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for information pertaining to history and prehistory of site. d) Compile,interpret and augment information pertaining to Fort Corchaug identifying boundary of sensitivity. IV. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Identify those aspectS of the environmental setting in Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. Discuss all aspects of Environmental Setting in sufficient detail to determine if significant adverse or beneficial impacts are opeected. Identify impacts as long or short term where possible. Provide greater detail in the following areas: Wetlands-Discuss conformance with tidal and freshwater wetlands regulations including setbac3a and density. Discuss any change in valuable wetland functions dendr, d in Setting. ' Land Use-Ability to preserve open space in conformance with Peconic Land Trust and Town common open space press vatioa goals- ' Visual-Cbange in visual character of site and affect on viewing populations. ' cultural Resources-Provide significant discussion regarding p!e-historic sensitivity of site, mitigation measures proposed,and adequacy of mitigation to avoid irreversible and irretrievable impact upon cultural resources. Determine impact on historic site resources as well as Fort Corchang site in contest of valuable archaeological resources. Impact discussion should be based on information collected by professional archaeologist and interpreted in Maw of environmental planning. V. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section IV. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY L Subsurface a) use excavated material for land reclamation 2 Surface CRAMER, VOORHIS &ASSOCIATES Page 5 ENVIRONMENTALAND•PEANNING CONSULTANTS Indian Shores,Cutchogue Scoping Outline a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b) minimize disturbance of sites c) desaga and implement soil erosion control plan 3. Topography a) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b) design adequate sod erosion devices to protect area of steep slope B. WATER RESOURCES L Groundwater a) design systems to provide adequate leaching of wastewater and stormwater. b) maintain permeable areas on the site c) maamrre natural areas.reduce fertilized areas Z Surface water a) ensure use of sal erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation. wimple - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas - landscaping b) design adequate stormwater control system c) increase wetlands setbacks and provide covenants where possible C. TERRESTRLA.I.AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY L Vegetation/wildlife a) restrict clearing to only those area ==nary b) preserve part of site as a natural area - c) after construction,landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d) preserve cross section of natural habitat areas. e) provide linkages to other sites and habitats f) preserve all wetlands and wetland functions through setbacks Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION L Tratioa—design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic now B. LAND USE AND ZONING L Fasting land use and wrong a) design project to comply with epsting land use plans b) design functional and visually appealing faclity to set standard and precedent for fnture surrounding land use C. COMMUNITY SERVICES L Po6m/F=Protection—ensure efficient access to residences on the site. 3. Utilities a) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fiztiires into facility design c)--incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design D. CULTURAL RESOURCES CRAMER, VOf.1 I &'ASSOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENTAL,AMU--yP1A-NNtNG CONSULTANTS Indian Shores,Cutchogue Scoping Ondine L Visual resources a) provide buffering to improve aesthetics. b) minimize road surface area and significant land disturbance- 2. Mstor=/Areca(—preserve adequate portion of site to provide for archaeological resource use,research and management- VL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS RU PLENA iTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section IV. that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section V. VII.ALTERNATIVES This section coat-ins categorises of alternatives with examples. Dismission of each alternative should be at a level su$uient to permit a comparative assessment of costs,benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasilble. A. STANDARD SITBDIVISION MAP—Provide discussion of benefits of clustering,conservation easements,and partial acquisition,as compared to standard subdivision map. B. CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION ALTERNATIVE—Address adequacy of recovery method of mitigating archaeological impacts as compared to avoidance of resources. C. EXPANDED FORT CORCHAUG SITE ALTERNATIVE—Provide a discussion of cluster to provide a larger preservation area in the vicinity of Fort Corchaug as identified on the plan,as compared with proposed project map_ D. EXPANDED WETLANDS SETSACKALTERNATIVE—Discuss benefits to cluster or open space configuration alternative that will provide greater setbacks from wetlands and/or maintain wetlands adjacent area in public or common Ownership- E. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE L Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers'need c) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts.._ Vim, IRRUFMHMZ AND IRRE W EVABIE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources luted in Section III that will be consumed,converted or made unavailable for future use. EL REFERENCES Provide complete list of references utilized in preparation of the report. im APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS_ A. List of underlying studies,reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement. B. Technical exhibits(if any)at a legible scale. G Relevant correspondence regarding the projects may be included. -- CRAMER, VOORHfS ASSOClATES Page 7 ENVIRONMENTALANDQ"F- NG CONSULTANTS r, P�_sEATKH1f.H�r �- o D New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation a. Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau NEW YORK STATE Peebles Island, PO Box 189,Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 QCRITIC'i7111111dwimR Bernadette Castro , Commissioner April 10, 1995 �' d=�: �FrQ 1 Ms. Melissa Spiro -- - Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: DEC/SEQRA Indian Shores Major Subdivision Southold(T) , Suffolk County 93PR2466 Dear Ms. Spiro: Thank you for your memorandum of March 29, 1995 by which you issued notice of a scoping session for the above project, to be held April 19, 1995. The office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status for this project; please consider this office to be an Interested Party in deliberation conducted in accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act. We are please to have our comments of December 23, 1993 considered by the planning board. We continue our strong recommendation that an archeological survey of the development site be conducted to identify archeological resources and to plan for avoidance or mitigation of possible impact to those resources. If you have any questions or -comments on this matter, please contact Dr. Robert Kuhn at 518/237-8643, ext. 255. Sinc rely, aures Warren rogram Analyst Field Services Bureau JPW:cm An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency 0 printed an recycled paper CHARLES A. GUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 180 OLD COUNTRY ROAD (RTE. 58) P. O.BOX 1547 RivEHHEAD,NY 11901 THE:(516)369-8200 ADJACENT TO FAX:15161 369-9060 MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT January 19, 1994 Mr. William J. Baxter 1030 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Indian Shores , Dear Mr. Baxter: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the environmental declaration adopted by the Southold Town Board. This precedes the scoping session which we are attempting to schedule for February 1, 1994 . Attached to the resolution is a copy of the report from the environmental consultant that the declaration refers to. I am hopeful that the Board will advise me within the next day that they are scheduling the scoping session for February 1 and will advise you by telephone. Please note that you must submit the $350 review fee when we appear at the scoping session. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC: jme Enclosures cc Mr. Jeffrey L. Seeman, Maguire Group Mr. Howard W. Young, Young & Young -5i zeie-e CRAMER, VOORHiS, W' SOCIATES 4 ENVIRONMENTA4L�ANl1:'P�-Mt �(4G CONSULTANTS January 3, 1994 Mr. Richard G.Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall,5309.' Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF— Major Subdivision Indian Shores SCTM No. 1000-116-1-3 Dear Mr.Ward: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2 Prepare Part H LEAF The Part 11 LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 105.6 acres of land, of which approximately 53.6 acres is forested, and 45.5 acres is established in existing agricultural use. The balance of the project site (6.5 acres) consists of tidal wetlands. The proposed project involves subdividing the property into 42 lots. Of these lots,39 would range between 40,000 and 87,300 square feet in size and would be developed for singly residential homesites. Lot 1 consists of 43 acres, and would be promoted as a farm related site (equestrian)with frontage on New Suffolk Avenue. The majority of the existing agricultural field would be divided into two lots of 12.1 acres and 20.5 acres each, and would be promoted for farming uses (vineyard). Two drainage areas would be provided to accommodate stormwater generated from impervious surfaces. Finally, proposal calls for retention of 5.4 acres of land as a park and recreation 1112L parcel is located in the east central yart of the site, coincident with the primary location of a documented Indian-fort site. The subject site is zoned Apiculture-Conservation District and requires lot sizes of a minimumsize of 2 acres. The proposed development map is based on yield map of 42 units with required lot sizes. It is noted that lots 38-42 border wetlands associated with Downs Creek. A line of wetlands is depicted on the map;however, the source of the wetlands location should be noted. If the line has not been verified by the Town Trustees and the NYSDEC, this should be accomplished and so noted on the map. 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Indian Shores,Cutchogue Long EAF Review The yield map should be feasibly buildable in accordance with recognized environmental and zoning requirements. Accordingly, the exact yield should remain uncertain until it is demonstrated that lots 34-42 conform to principal building wetlands setbacks of 75 feet and the required front yard zoning setbacks. The most constrained lot appears to be Lot 36, therefore, it may be advisable to have a typical homesite depicted on this lot to demonstrate conformity. Other aspects of the yield map appear to be consistent with zoning requirements. The environmental resources of the site have been reviewed as related to the proposed development. The elevation of the property varies between approximately 5 and 30 feet with an average elevation of 20 feet over most of the central parts of the site. Slopes are generally less than 6 percent,except in areas where the elevation decreases eastward toward Downs Creek Average slopes in these areas are in the range of 12-18 percent with some locally greater slopes,particularly within proposed Lots 18-23. A variety of soil types are present on the site dominated by Plymouth loamy sand (PIA,P and PIC),and also including Haven loam,Riverhead sandy loam and Tidal Marsh. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV but is not within the North Fork Water Budget Area. The elevation of groundwater beneath the site}s approximately 1 foot above mean sea level,indicating a depth to w�r-of 4-29�eed.t,with an average of 19 feet in the interior of site. There is adegaate a evation on all of the proposed lots to allow fo 1 tin of on-site sanitary disposal systems. In addition,the proposed density of no more an 42 units is consistent with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for groundwater management.' It is noted that the site is presently farmed, and may be subject to application of fertilizers,thereby resulting in nitrogen load under present conditions. The area north of the site is identified as being subject to elevated nitrogen levels and the areas around and including the subject site are identified as having aldicarb contamination as a result of farming activities. Water supply is proposed to be from an on site source, and on-site sanitary disposal is proposed Water supply will require approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The site includes a variety of habitats including first growth woods with dominant locust on the northern wooded portions of the site, dry oak forest with dominant oak species on the southern wooded portions of the site, agricultural field on the western part of the site,and tidal marsh on the east side of the site. Wildlife or evidence observed on site during inspection included:white tailed deer,squirrel, chickadee, sparrows and otheryperching and songbirds. In addition,two great blue heron were observed in the agricultural field, and an active osprey nest was observed within the wetlands area south of New Suffolk Avenue. The wetlands are identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as estuarine, intertidal, emergent marsh. The wetlands are regulated under both Article 25 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law and the Town of Southold Wetlands Ordinance. It is noted that the majority of single family residential development is placed in the forested areas and Lots 4-9 and 14-22 are all adjacent tidal wetlands. As noted in connection with the yield map,the wetlands should be confirmed by the regulating agencies to establish adequate development setbacks. The Town may wish to explore alternative open space configurations to preserve additional forested areas particularly in steep slope regions adjacent to tidal wetlands. Such concepts could work in connection with increased open space in connection with the identified Indian fort site. CRAMER, VO. , RHl . & SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT` S G CONSULTANTS Page2 Indian Shores,C utchogue Long EAF Review The proposed project will generate traffic;however, there is dual access to Main Road and New Suffolk Avenue,with a proposed future tap to adjacent lands to the west. This distribution, and the adequacy of existing roads indicates that traffic impacts would be expected to be minor. The project is consistent with existing zoning, and is compatible with surrounding land uses. Ukewise the project is not expected to have a significant impact on community services or demography. The site contains significant cultural sensitivity in the form of historic and archaeological resources. The site includes a documented Indian fort site,Fort Corchaug. Preliminary archaeological study was conducted by Ralph Solecki between 1936-1948 and documented in a Master's Thesis (Solecki, 1949). The site has been nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. The concluding statement on the nomination form concludes the following. "An almost completely untouched area, the site holds great potential for future exploration". Utilization of the site without understanding the ramifications represents a potential irreversible and irretrievable loss of important cultural resources. Additional planningis warranted to determine the boundaries of the feature,with the intent of maintain.ing a significant portion of the site in a natural state for future cultural research. In addition to the Fort Corchaug feature, there is partially extant historic farmhouse structure on the north part of the site. The structure exhibits hand-hewn beams, cut nails, and plaster/lathe interior surfaces as well as other 19th century architectural features. Additional out- buildings and farm equipment is present in the vicinity. The area of first growth woods was likely cleared in connection with historic farming activities, and has since overgrown._ The structure should be reviewed by a qualified architectural historian to document infbrmation regarding site and structure history prior to demolition. 4. Recommendations The site contains unique and valuable ecological features in the form of habitat diversity, and tidal wetlands. Forested areas with slopes in excess of 20 percent slope eastward toward the tidal wetlands. This area is proposed to be divided into individual lots with the exception of a 5.4 acre recreation area including the Indian fort site. The boundary of the wetlands should be verified and referenced(if this has not been done), and adequate wetlands setbacks should be ensured. Covenanted buffer areas should be established in the rear of lots backing on the wetlands. Consideration should be given to alternative cluster proposals that would preserve additional forested steeper slope areas adjacent the wetlands. It is noted that the subdivision man identifies'vegetation retention buffers"in areas that are currend not vegetated. The map should indicated if these ares are intended to be landscape or if successional field vegetation will be allowed to grow in these areas. The site contains unique historic and archaeological resources. A Stage I Cultural Resources Assessment is recommended in order to update and compile all available archival and field documentation of the significance of these resources on the site. Through this study,efforts should be made to further determine the boundaries of the Fort Corchaug Indian fort site and related use areas. Preservation of a conservative area that includes these resources is encouraged in order to provide a means for future archaeological research. As an alternative, recovery of archaeological CRAMER, VOr( RHt & SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT �' '' G CONSULTANTS Page 3 Indian Shores,Cutchogue Long FAF Review resources could occur Prior to development of some areas on the fringe of the Indian fort and activity areas in order to provide a means of utilization of this land. If the current configuration of land development, leaving only a 5.4 acre area is pursued, documentation of the relative cultural insignificance or recovery of archaeological information would be required prior to approval of the such a development proposal. The Indian Shores project as proposed is expected to have a potential significant impact on ecological and wetlands resources. In addition,the project is expected to result in irreversible and irretrievable loss of historic and archaeological resources. As a result it is recommended that additional environmental documentation be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of these impacts,obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and research possible alternatives and mitigation. The most efficient means of achieving this would be through an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS). This letter provides a summary of resources and impacts,and would serve to"scope down"the content of an EIS to those issues which require detailed analysis. This would make the process more efficient and allow for project review under the framework of the EIS document. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, 01 -74� Charles J.Voorhis,CEP,AICD enc: Long EAF Part I,II U MER, V t � SOCIATES Page 4 ENVIRONMENONSULTANTS (,&T 1 —PROJECT INF0Rti1AT10;® Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies. research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Indian Shores Subdivision LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Main Road, Cutchogue NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR William J. Baxter, Jr., and Estate of William J. Baxter BUSINESS TELEPHONE AOOnESS ( 516) 369-8200 c/o Charles R. Cuddy, 180 Old Country Road, Post Office Box 1547 - CITYIPO STATE fz1PCODE Riverhead, New York NY 901 NAME OF OWNER(it different) (same) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Major subdivision of 105.6 acres, SCTM #1000-116-1-3 Subdivision sketch plan "Cluster Map Indian Shores" dated August 16, 1993 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Olndustrial OCornmercial OResidential(suburban] ORural(non-farm) • Forest @Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 105.6 acres. APPROXIMATE ACRcA,',E PREScivTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Orushland (Non-agricultural) 0 .0 acres 3- 0 acres Forested 53 . 6 acres 34. 1 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 45 - 5 acres 43.0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 6 . 5 acres 6.5 acres Water Surface Area 0 .0 acres 0.0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) (1 0 .icres 2.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces - 00 acres 7 _n Other (Indicate type)—1 awn- acres 0 .0 acres -0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? RdA, PIA a. Soil drainage: L)Well drained 94_ % of site OModcrately well drained "a of site ®Poorly drained 6 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 45.5 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). ---� ,. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site) ❑Yes )No a. What is depth to bedrock? N.A. (in feet) —600± ( I J�L_ 7 .� 3 Z �+-fia..r�.t::..... ---'v.ie.�siS�':"YAf">daG•iwwA[.��.i��M�iY�i:.tl�Z"1't::«a'.n.=eaiir•180ki►�:�:.SA• "7VT.`.r�U..�i AL ;'t, v.. wrc ; �;��•i L,1se ul I1rnI10 '1ICCL site %%1(11 )lulle� X u 11);. _ _ 'o X� It) 1 — or G. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building. site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OlYes )LINO SrTLe YVOHiPJ47LCM FQft 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? =,Yes �No , .��// What is the depth of the water table? 0-30 feet) /V t770,VAZ_K&Zb(in Of s7�S7tQRiG 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [Ayes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shelf fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ]Yes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes YLINo According to Young & Young , L.S. Identify each species r_'A 24Ev #rin/ A,IA "rL XTX W OF S/ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, oilier geological formations) ®Yes ONO Describe Part of the LLta.JS contiatjous to Dnwne 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes xlNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? []Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Downs Creek a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Pp r n n i r R a y 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a: Name Downs Creek b. Size (In acres) 20± acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Ayes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? IAYes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? byes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 . of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes ®NO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 105 . 6 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: _ 22 -0 acres initially; 22 -0 acres ultimately, c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 83. 6 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 proposed 84 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour _19 . 6 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple family Condominium Initially 42 Ultimately 42 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n/a height: width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? It. 1500 ft. Main S.R. 25 3 1100 %W Suffolk Ami e :- • ...�.� ... .... .... vw.. ti.:ii I[:111..-I��:TT7��"�a`�'�+.!QOM Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGN1 t uuc Re"nslblllty of Le" Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and 4tterminations betr :atonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significaM. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl, asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold o magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State am for most situations. But, for any specific project or site otter examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriat for a Potential Large Impact response. thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative an have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questio+ • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of tl impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresho is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to mod-era impact, also check the Yes-box in column 3. A No response indicates but such a reduction is not possible. TI must be explained in Part 3. 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND - ----- - -• Impact Project Chani 1 . Will the proposed action resuft in a physical change to the project site? ONO )kES Examples that would apply to column les ON, • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise Per 100 ❑ Zy foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Ycs ❑N 3 feet✓ • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. 0 ❑ [--)Yes ON ❑ ❑Yes ❑N • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. •.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑Yes ❑N than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑h tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑l' • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t 2. Will there be an effect t!• _.•y unique or unusual land for s found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) NO OYES • Specific land forms: 0 0 Oyes Of 1 2 � 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact PrOjeet Change (?Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law.NO OYES . 'xamp1es that would aPPI to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ OYe3 ONO • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing NOnewObody of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 106 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of .water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N( • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON( 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater ONO "'-ES quality or quantity? .. Exampks that would apply.tq column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes N ON Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑Yes have approval to.serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Of, supply systema • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑r • tly ❑ ❑ CYes ❑` Liquid effluent will be conve*off the site to facilities whi;h presen do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per ❑ Oyes ❑t day. • Proposed Action will likel- c3v3P siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Cit existing body of water the;,Ntent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical 1:1 ❑ Dyes ❑1 products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas'without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑1 and/or sewer services. ❑ C3 Yes ❑ • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ Other impacts: or surface Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, water runoff? XNO OYES Exzmples that would apply to column 2 ❑ C ❑Yes C • PrrNrw Artinn »cwld Change flood water flows Small to Potential Can Impact Be Modorat• Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ 1 ❑ ❑Yes ONO • .. a proposed ac tion would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppingr or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO �ES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ _ ❑Yes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. , • Proposed -land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. 'roject components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑Yes ❑No _ greening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ ❑Yes -ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO VES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ XYes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ X 9Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 _ ONO eES )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: An= of ❑ ❑Yes ONO Apr 11c ii2T OF Ajrnpew Qbaj T/�S 1 2 3 M IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact 8 Moderate Large Mitigated By 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation s>(NOf OYES Impact Impact Project Chant Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑M • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, IMPACT ON ENERGY 15, Will proposed action affect the community's source Oof fuel or OYES energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑l� any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑� transmission'or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve .a major commercial or industrial use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑r • Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? O OYES , f Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑1 facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Ell • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local , C] ❑ ❑Yes ❑' ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑ noise screen. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? XN 0 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes"'in any 13 ❑ ❑Yes C form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ' p ❑Yes C • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. ❑Yes C • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ within 2.000leet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. ❑Yes [ • Other impacts: _ _ ❑ ❑ 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate large Mitigated By *- Will proposed action affect the character of the existing commun t Impact Impact Project Change ONO l�`S Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ Oyes , ONO project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. X ❑N❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ o Yes • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ , or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Development will create a demand foi additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ OYes ONO • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. X❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO )*ES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of-lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact($) ma mitigated. Instructions ` Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) �rh�O� OGy�r LANNING BOARD MEMBERS N SCOTT L. HARRIS �� • Supervisor Richard G.Ward.Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 Mark S.McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 14, 1994 Charles R. Cuddy 180 Old Country Road P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Indian Shores S/s Main Road and N/s New Suffolk Ave. Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 10, 1994: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status on this Type 1 action. Be it further RESOLVED that the Planning Board, as lead agency, finds that the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination of a Positive Declaration. A copy of the Positive Declaration is enclosed. I have also enclosed, for your information, copies of the comments received from other involved agencies and a copy of the report from the Board' s environmental consultant. Please contact the Planning Board within two (2) weeks to schedule a scoping session. There will be a review fee for both the scoping session and the review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The $350.00 review fee for the scoping session must be submitted in full before the session will be held. Page 2 Proposed Major Subdivision - Indian Shores January 11, 1994 Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, A / 416W Richard G. Ward I'5 Chairman enc. cc: Albert Krupski, Board of Trustees Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Vito Minei, Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Roger Evans, NYSDEC -Stony Brook Commissioner Jorling - NYSDEC, Albany Vito Lena - N.Y.S. Department of Transportation James Warren, NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Stephen Jones, Suffolk County Planning Commission Chic Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. ���SUfFOLk�O r- _LANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti r?�� SCOTT L. HARRIS 0 Supervisor Richard G.Ward.Chairman George Ritchie Latham.Jr. ,� `�+� Town Hall,53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 Mark S.McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance January 10, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental' Conservation Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Major Subdivision Indian Shores SEQR Status: Type 1 Description of Action: Residential clustered subdivision. 42 single family lots on 105. 6 acres. 39 of the proposed lots range between 40,000 and 87,300 square feet in area. Remaining 3 lots are 4.7, 12.1 and 20.5 acres. 5.4 acres are proposed as a park and recreation area. This parcel is located in the east central part of the site, coincident with the primary location of a documented Indian fort site. Parcel located in Low-Density Residential (R-80) Zoning District. Location: North side of New Suffolk Avenue and South side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25. ) Cutchogue, Town of Southold SCTM# 1000-116-1-3 Page 2 Indian Shores - Positive Declaration January 10, 1994 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The applicant has provided the lead agency with a Long Environmental Assessment Form. The LEAF has been reviewed by the Planning Board, the Planning Board' s Environmental Consultant, and other involved agencies. The Indian Shores project is expected to have a potential significant impact on ecological and wetlands resources. In addition, the project is expected to result in irreversible and irretrievable loss of historic and archaeological resources. The project was reviewed by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) . In a letter dated December 23, 1993, the OPRHP stated that the site contains multiple known archeological sites and that an archeological survey should be conducted for the parcel. The project was reviewed by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) . In a letter dated January 7 , 1994, the SCDHS stated that potential impacts associated with the proposed subdivision may be severe and in many instances quite irreversible. The SCDHS recommended that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement be prepared to address the issues of preservation of open space and the character of the community, potential impacts to groundwater and surface waters, stormwater runoff and drainage impacts, as well as alternatives. The Southold Town Planning Board has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of the impacts of the project, to obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and to research possible alternatives and mitigation measures. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro, Planner Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ( 516) 765-1938 Page 3 Indian Shores - Positive Declaration January 10, 1994 A copy of this notice sent to: Albert Krupski, Board of Trustees Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Vito Minei, Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Roger Evans, NYSDEC -Stony Brook Commissioner Jorling -NYSDEC -Albany Vito Lena -N.Y.S. Department of Transportation James Warren, NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Stephen Jones, Suffolk County Planning Commission Chic Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Public Bulletin Board "'"'' [''"''-"''' � 0. f tf`- Nt\\' \OK\ �Tiil l�k F'1HT\1f NT Of I�:\'IK(J�'.tl X111 t t>�SI H\'Al ION IN II ER-OFFICE SPEED MEMO RlGUI ATORY AFFAIR, (USE ONLY FOR UNOFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE) TO. LVIC.-/�SSG� DATE / FROM. REPMRtb1 SUBJECT y �I�1�o `� ��L�rZ� vi �rlr JC(.UC,ktf-rAT BOTTOM OF THIS FORM 1 oo U Qcnr Cir•�- 0-10 c; rye ecl S LA �^e REPLY 1 r � PLANG BOARD MEMBERS '_ SCOT- �_ HARRIS NNI .� •, � Six^^sor Richard G. Ward.Chairman George Ritchie Latham Jr. ^! ` Town Hall. 52:95 Main Roa Bennett Orlowski.Jr. - _ P.O• !---x 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold. `:cx York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(5i 765 - 1823 --TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �2cPirv��jPf� 19 Q � • •' i ��Ch � r3 1993 l_: i � it a.NJ r O . RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: IThe purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Enviror_:-_�ental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your � jurisdiction in the action described below; - 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and j 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. I Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed I Environmental Assessment Form (EAF.) to assist you in your reszense. i Project Name: _ S�, ��• �av� c��S 1V1a'ac' �v�Stor i Requested Action: 1�o;or Sc)�c"��.��s;or1 or • + IOS 6 a cY� SEQRA Classification: Type I ( ) Unlisted - Contact Person: AeAissa, P%Ro ( 516) -765-1938 P LA iR, P�GPEpTiON iy�SrO r& Ay 0 r" New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ` Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau O NEW YORK STATE i Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Orin Lehman Commissioner December 23, 1993 Mr. Richard G. Ward Chairman, Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold., New York 11971 Dear Mr. Ward: Re: SEQRA Indian Shores Subdivision Southold, Suffolk County 93PR2466 The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received the documentation you provided on your project. As the state agency responsible for the coordination of the State's historic preservation programs, including the encouragement and assistance of local preservation efforts, we offer the following comments. The OPRHP has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status for this project. Please consider this agency as an interested party in this review. The proposed Indian Shores Major Subdivision contains multiple known archeological sites. Therefore, it is our very strong recommendation that an archeological survey be conducted for this parcel. Attached is a list of qualified archaeologists. Please note that if any State Agency is involved in this undertaking, it is appropriate for that agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition, if there is any federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations, "Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR 800 require that agency to initiate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) . An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency punted on recycled paper ///'Mr. Richard G. Ward December 23, 1993 Page 2 If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please call me at (518) 237-8643, ext. 280. Sincerely, James Warren Program Analyst Field Services Bureau JPW:gc Attachment: "A Word About Archeological Surveys" .T H t1 — 1 ._I - _ -L 1•t r_ i L = - __ - - - r , _ — L4 •-1 1 i 1_; T COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOI—K COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OP HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. Hma6fto, M.D., M.P.H. GOIeMISS101vEA January 7, 1994 Meliss;t Spiro Southold Plalulit:o Board Town Hall,530.05 Nfain Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,1`iew YOLK 11971 Indian i S:iotes Nfajor Sul;clivisicl: SCTM#: 1000-1.16-1-13 De,u:FIs. Spiro: The Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated Dkccewbcr 9, 1-)9-4, c,,>j,--eming the above-referenced project and offers the followztzg conut:ents. Thi; c.ua:ttnet:; has no objection to your designation as lead agency. We submit that the potential impacts associated Nvith the proposed Indian Shores SubJivision may be severe and in many instances quite irreversible. Our recommendation is therefore, that the Town issue a posit ve declaration and at a mirtimutn require the applicat:t to prepare a Draft Eavirotinnet>ta1 it:apact Sta,ell ent (DEIS). Development of the envirotunentally sensitive parcel of land may also impact unique habitat for endmtgered and threatened species, and cause disturbtutce to culturally si;niftcant resources. Issues that should be addressed in lite DExS include preservation of op is space mid the cliatacter of the community, potential impacts to groundwater,and surface waters, stonnvra(er runoff and drainage Lmpacts as well as alternatives. We believe the cumulative impacts of the proposed activity in this area should be carefuily ex:u::i:w'd !o fac:lit-le a p u0cnt. and feu• sighted plm,rlirg effort to alluw the Town to hest manige its re ounces 'refore the ti,ae "or such planning i:,s passed. L).V'CION Cr i MVIA•?,.--.TAL OV ,JTT Wurfn C1:r11CR RIVCRMCAD A.Y. 1'301.3397 T i-a t 1 - 1 L. - _ -� ; i_i ., _ -_ _ _ _ L }t n - t i l 3 .•t t� 1 r `-t = Letter to Meiioza $Piro January 7, 19941 ?age 2 Th:uik ;you for the opportuniry tc review this application. if you have any questions,please feel flee to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-20' 3. Sincerely Yours, Kbnberly Shaw Sr. Envirow rental Analy;t Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito Mind,F.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. Frank Dowl' ig, SC Plarming CRAMER, VOORHIq WASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTALAflI4Wt4G CONSULTANTS January 3, 1994 Mr.Richard G.Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF—Major Subdivision Indian Shores JAIN SC17M No. 1000-116-1-3 Dear Mr. Ward: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Pan I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and - amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2 Prepare Part H LEAF The Part H LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 105.6 acres of land, of which approximately 53.6 acres is forested, and 45.5 acres is established in existing agricultural use. The balance of the project site (6.5 acres) consists of tidal wetlands. The proposed project involves subdividing the property into 42 lots. Of these lots, 39 would range between 40,000 and 87,300 square feet in size and would be developed for single family residential homesites. Lot 1 consists of 4.7 acres, and would be promoted as a farm related site (equestrian)with frontage on New Suffolk Avenue. The majority of the existing agricultural field would be divided into two lots of 12.1 acres and 20.5 acres each, and would be promoted for farming uses (vineyard). Two drainage areas would be provided to accommodate stormwater generated from impervious surfaces. F the proposal calls for retention of 5.4 acres of land as a park and recreation area. This-Is parcel is located in the east central part of the site, coincident with the primary location of a documented Indian fort site. The subject site is zoned Agriculture-Conservation i District and requires lot sizes of a minimum size of 2 acres. eroposed development map is based on yield map of 42 units with required lot sizes. It is noted that lots 38-42 border wetlands associated with Downs Creek. A line of wetlands is depicted on the map;however, the source of the wetlands location should be noted. If the line has not been verified by the Town Trustees and the NYSDEC, this should be accomplished and so noted on the map. 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Indian Shores,Cutchogue Long EAF Review The yield map should be feasibly buildable in accordance with recogmized environmental and zoning requirements. Accordingly, the exact yield should remain uncertain until it is demonstrated that lots 34-42 conform to prince al building wetlands setbacks of 75 feet and the required front yard zomng setbacks. The most constrained lot appears to be Lot 36,therefore, it may be advisable to have a typical homesite depicted on this lot to demonstrate conformity. Other aspects of the yield map appear to be consistent with zoning requirements. The environmental resources of the site have been reviewed as related to the proposed development. The elevation of the property varies between approximately 5 iLncf 30 feet with an average elevation of 20 feet over most of the central parts of the site. Slopes are generally less than 6 percent, except in areas where the elevation decreases eastward toward Downs Creek. Average slopes in these areas are in the range of 12-18 percent with some locally greater slopes,particularly within proposed Lots 18-23. A variety of soil types are present on the site dominated by Plymouth loamy sand(PIA,P1B and PIC), and also including Haven loam,Riverhead sandy loam and Tidal Marsh. The site is located in Groundwater Management Zone IV but is not within the North Fork Water Budget Area. The elevation of groundwater beneath the site is approximately 1 foot above mean sea level,indicating a depth to water of 4-29 feet,with an average of 19 feet in the interior of the site. There is adequate elevation on all of the proposed lots to allow for sighting of on-site sanitary disposal systems. In addition, the proposed density of no more than 42 units is consistent with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for groundwater management.' It is noted that the site is presently farmed, and maybe subject to application of fertilizers,thereby resulting in nitrogen load under present conditions. The area north of the site is identified as beingsubject to elevated nitrogen levels and the areas around and including the subject site are identified as having aldicarb contamination as a result of farming activities. Water supply is proposed to be from an on site source,and on-site sanitary disposal is proposed Water supply will require approval of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The site includes a variety of habitats including first growth woods with dominant locust on the northern wooded portions of the site, dry oak forest with dominant oak species on the southern wooded portions of the site, agricultural field on the western part of the site,and tidal marsh on the east side of the site. Wildlife or evidence observed on site during inspection included:white tailed deer, squirrel, chickadee, sparrows and other perching and songbirds. In addition,two great blue heron were observed in the agricultural field, and an active osprey nest was observed within the wetlands area south of New Suffolk Avenue. The wetlands are identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as estuarine, intertidal, emergent marsh. The wetlands are regulated under both Article 25 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law and the Town of Southold Wetlands Ordinance. It is noted that the majority of single family residential development is placed in the forested areas and Lots 4-9 and 14-22 are all adjacent tidal wetlands. As noted in connection with the yield map, the wetlands should be confirmed by the regulating agencies to establish adequate development setbacks. The Town may wish to explore alternative open space configurations to preserve additional forested areasparticularly in steep slope regions adjacent to tidal wetlands. Such concepts could work in connection with increased open space in connection with the identified Indian fort site. CRAMER, VOA,,' RHI. &! SOCIATES Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ' �'� IG CONSULTANTS av Indian Shores,Cutchogue Long EAF Review The proposed project will generate traffic; however, there is dual access to Main Road and New Suffolk Avenue,with a proposed future tap to adjacent lands to the west. This distribution, and the adequacy of existing roads indicates that traffic impacts would be expected to be minor. The project is consistent with existing zoning, and is compatible with surrounding land uses. Likewise the project is not expected to have a significant impact on community services or demography. The site contains significant cultural sensitivity in the form of historic and archaeological resources. The site includes a documented Indian fort site,Fort Corchaug. Preliminary archaeological study was conducted by Ralph Solecki between 1936-1948 and documented in a Master's Thesis (Solecki, 1949). The site has been nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. The concluding statement on the nomination form concludes the following: "An almost completely untouched area, the site holds great potential for future exploration". Utilization of the site without understanding the ramifications represents a potential irreversible and irretrievable loss of important cultural resources. Additional planning is warranted to determine the boundaries of the feature,with the intent ofmaintaining a significant portion of the site in a natural state for future cultural research. In addition to the Fort Corchaug feature, there is partially extant historic farmhouse structure on the north part of the site. The structure exhibits hand-hewn beams, cut nails, and plaster/lathe interior surfaces as well as other 19th century architectural features. Additional out- buildings and farm equipment is present in the vicinity. The area of first growth woods was likely cleared in connection with historic farming activities, and has since overgrown. The structure should be reviewed by a qualified architectural historian to document information regarding site and structure history prior to demolition. 4. Recommendations The site contains unique and valuable ecological features in the form of habitat diversity, and tidal wetlands. Forested areas with slopes in excess of 20 percent slope eastward toward the tidal wetlands. This area is proposed to be divided into individual lots with the exception of a 5.4 acre recreation area including the Indian fort site. The boundary of the wetlands should be verified and referenced (if this has not been done), and adequate wetlands setbacks should be ensured. Covenanted buffer areas should be established in the rear of lots backing on the wetlands. Consideration should be given to alternative cluster proposals that would preserve additional forested steeper slope areas adjacent the wetlands. It is noted that the subdivision map identifies"vegeta ion retention buffers"in areas that are currently not vegetated. The map should indicated if these ares are intended to be landscape or if successional field vegetation will be allowed to grow in these areas. The site contains unique historic and archaeological resources. A Stage I Cultural Resources Assessment is recommended in order to update and compile all available archival and field documentation of the significance of these resources on the site. Through this study, efforts should be made to further determine the boundaries of the Fort Corchaug Indian fort site and related use areas. Preservation of a conservative area that includes these resources is encouraged in order to provide a means for future archaeological research. As an alternative,recovery of archaeological CRAMER, VO� I 8(' SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTA' �` G CONSULTANTS Page 3 Indian Shores,Gutchogue Long EAF Review resources could occur prior to development of some areas on the fringe of the Indian fort and activity areas in order to provide a means of utilization of this land. If the current configuration of land development,leaving only a 5.4 acre area is pursued, documentation of the relative cultural insignificance or recovery of archaeological information would be required prior to approval of the such a development proposal. The Indian Shores project as proposed is expected to have a potential significant impact on ecolo&ical and wetlands resources. In addition,the project is expected to result in irreversible and irretrievable loss of historic and archaeological resources. As a result it is recommended that additional environmental documentation be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of these impacts,obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and research possible alternatives and mitigation. The most efficient means of achieving this would be through an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS). This letter provides a summary of resources and impacts, and would serve to"scope down"the content of an EIS to those issues which require detailed analysis. This would make the process more efficient and allow for project review under the framework of the EIS document. If you have an questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to can. Very truly yours, Charles J.Voorhis,cu,Amp enc: Long EAF Part I,II CRAMER, VO. SOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENTCONSULTANTS (AWT 1 —PROJE=CT INFORMAT10 ® Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional :nformation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. t is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve ne%v studies,research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Indian Shores Subdivision LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Munlclpallty and County) Main Road, Cutchogue NAME OF APPVCANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE William J. Baxter, Jr., and Estate of William J. Baxter ( 516) 369-8200 ADDRESS c/o Charles R. Cuddy, 180 Old Country Road, Post Office Box 1547 - CtTYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Riverhead, New York NY 11901 NAME OF OWNER(It dlllerent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE (same) ( ) ADDRESS CIiYlPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Major subdivision of 105.6 acres, SCTM #1000-116-1-3 Subdivision sketch plan "Cluster Map Indian Shores" dated August 16, 1993 Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Olndustrial OCommercial OResidential(suburban] ORural(non-farm) • JaForest RIAgriculture OOlher 2. Total acreage of project area: 105.6 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER CONIPLET1014 Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 . 0 acres 3 acres Forested 53. 6 acres 34. 1 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 45 . 5 acres 43.0 acres Welland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 6 . 5 acres 6. 5 acres Water Surface Area 0.0 acres 0 .0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 _ 0 .icres 2.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 0 acres -Z—(I— acres Other (Indicate type) 1 awns & l 0 .0 acres •0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? RdA, PIA a. Soil drainage: UWell drained 94 % of site OModerately well drained % of site ®Poorly drained 6 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 45.5 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). ---" I. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes nNo . What is depth to bedrock. N.A. (in feet) --(000+ i fill � . .. -�•. .+-.. .. ,.r�t's:i'�iSi�• "'fie?.::i •ua •'.-�-.�.�"..s�.�c.::..r..�:....Tis.:..srs•...�:�Sioo�i��2r�1f•.i�+:%'v:+.+:t_�'—'1i'Yw.�►ii1'al:�--. �s�7s�-.,:=a+. NJjpfos.niate percentage ui Irrnlio"' )lect site %%ith 5101re5 X U li):u _ _ .'oor gr1s, a • 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OlYes allo SI'i;F mo"/Aj Twm FQ1Z 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? :;Yes Eno What is the depth of the water table? 0-3 0 AV4 (in feeE) / oN�ZFb�S7L�2 oI� i7�S7QItiG A-+ea _. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Oyes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? tYes ONo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes )ffNo According'to Young & Young . L. S. Identify each species QPM4FX AhIAI-15 /N IY CM d&4Sr= AAV3 iryt_n f'4U7W Of 4VZC' 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ®Yes ONo Describe Part of the site is contiguous to Downt CrP k (tidal wpt l and Q 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes XXNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Eyes ONo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: __ Downs Creek a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Pernn i r Rai 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a:'Name Downs Creek b. Size (In acres) 20± acre s 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ]yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allose connection? OYes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? bYes ONo Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article ZS-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ®NO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? 16Yes ONo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes ®No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 105 . 6 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: _ 22 -0 acres initially; 22-0 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 83 . 6 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 84 - g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 19 .6 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 42 Ultimately 42 I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure n— height: --width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 1500 ft. %in S.R. 25 3 1100 lbw Suffolk Avenue � .. .... �. ..a.. _ .. ... 'S:�•ii.f=..y.jrt'L:.�n�lVC�.> .i�aiGS�7N� 2.'Ilow much nalur.rl rnatFnat (i i Al earth. etc ) %vill be removed from the none tons/cubic yards 3, Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? X]Yes ONo ONM a. li yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? re s i dent i a 1 d e v e I o pm e n t b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Elves ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? X]Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 22.0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? X]Yes ONo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 48 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: not applicable (n/a ) a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). C. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes VNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 75 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project none 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes )ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes 6No _ a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? INYes ONO Type sanitary "4. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Oyes $7No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? YDYes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month 6 . 3 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Yes ONO C. If yes, give name Town of Southold location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ®Yes ONO e. If Yes, explain _ recyclables 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes MNO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ]Yes ONO lawn care 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes XNO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? - Dyes* nNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? XMYes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) electrical 22. If water*supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 10 gallons/minute. "3. Total anticipated water usage per day J2,6 0 0 gallons/day. + irrigation -11. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? OYes ONO If Yes, explain A � 1: ti. APJ!1o%.1:� Requ. .•d. Submit;al �Y(7e Dale City. Town it;,.;e Guars _..l'es �,]NO City. Town. Village Planning Goord PB NYe= 0 N subdivision Sept. 1993 City, Town Zoning Board E Yes tt,No City, County Health Department CO. NYes ONo water su?oly/sewage disposal Other Local AgenciesTot-ln Trustees IMYes ❑No ►ietlands Other Regional Agencies 14Yes ONO subdivision State Agencies MYes ❑No wetlands Federal Agencies Dyes MNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? byes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 0subdivision Osite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? _ A/C Agricultural-Conservation 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 42 residential lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? n/a 5. What-is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? n/a { . _ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? X91Yes ONo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Zonino: A-C Agricultural Conservation Use: Agriculture 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1A mile? X❑Yes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 42 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 38,OU0 sq. ft. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes L1No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. Lire protection)? )ayes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? UYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result*in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes XydNo a. If yes, is (lie existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑Non/a D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid thein. , �EV�c-�.2d0 3Y: � r7,2c� l7- l/OQ/t�yt-iS, C1�Y'� �f'ZCt� / E. Verification C'4"46-P, I'0¢Arr71 /�ssa�c. T�. Lovsu� 70 1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of illy knowledge. Applicant'Spon)or Nine Wi l l i a J. Baxter, Jr. Date 9/3/93 Signature Title If the action is in the Coaslal rea,and you are a state agency, compiele [lie Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. N TH FO BANK & TRUST CO. 5 _ ice President Sr.•Tru st Officer part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS ANU 1 NtIK iMAUNI I U ResponsiblUtY of lea" Agency General Information (Read Carefully) responses and -+--terminations beer • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my reasonable) The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. entifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) mine significance.s not an Idethat it is also impact o inrily column 2rs mpl� Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold o{ magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples arc generally applicable throughout the State anc for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other exampks and* lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. vary. Therefore, the • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each an e haustivellist of�impacts and chresholdstlo answer each ges are Nurstion have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact- b. mpactb. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriates (column colu1 or 2mn ze of th, 2.'ndicate lIf Impact the ooccur but tential rthreshol, impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example p _ is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If. reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider e impact as potentially large and proceed to PART the e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changds)in the project to a small to mock-rat impact, also check the Yes-box in column 3. A No response indicates tical such a reduction is not possible. Th, must be explained in Part 3. F. 2 3 Sma11 to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Lame Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND - ----- - - impact Impact pro}eet Mange 1 . Will the proposed action resuk in a physical change to the project site? ONO )kES Examples that would apply to column 2 (15 foot rise pet 100 El Kes ❑No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. 0 ❑Yes ONo • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ 3 feet- n D ❑yam ONc • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. D D Dyes ONc • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. D Dyes ONc •.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. ❑ Dyes DNc • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Cl D Dyes ON, • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. D D Dyes ON, • Construction in a designated floodway. D Dyes ON, • Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect v. _.jy unique or unusual land If�f__0frp''s found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)�QNO OYES D Dyes ON • Specific land forms: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24,25 of the Environmental Conservation LawYES XN 0 xamples 'that would column 2 apply to ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No protected stream. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected ezistin-Vr newD S of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 Dyes ❑No • A 106 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of .water ❑ ❑ or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Dyes ❑Nc • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. a ❑ Dyes ❑Nc • Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater ONO )9 (ES quality or quantity? . Examples that would apply.ti column 2 Dyes ❑Nc Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ g ❑ Dyes ❑Nc Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to.serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N� gallons per minute pumping Capacity. ❑ ❑ Oyes ON, • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ntly ❑ ❑ Des 0 • Liquid effluent will be conveyer;off the site to facilities which prese do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ❑ ❑ Dyes 0 • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. ❑ ❑ 0Yes ON • Proposed Action will likel•• c3o;P silLation or other discharge into an existing body of water tt.;- �xicnt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. ❑ Dyes ❑r` • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ products greater than 1,100 gallons. ❑ Dyes ❑r` • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ and/or sewer services. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. ❑ ❑ Dyes Or • Other impacts: nag f Will proposed action alter draie flow or patter_nsNOor s OYES J water runoff? ))11��''`` ExZTples that would apply to column 2 ❑ 0 Dyes ❑ • Proposed Action wc'uld chance flood water flogs Small to ru►� ► a, v. ► n��N ... .,. Moderate Large MltIgate�d By • Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No p )sed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Other impacts: IMPACT ON #JR . Will proposed action affect air quality? OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 )<No ❑ Oyes ONO Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ hour. ❑ Dyes ONO Proposed Action will. result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of El refuse per hour. ❑ Dyes ❑No Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour ora ❑ heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ ❑ Oyu ❑No Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 'ill Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda ONO , _. . .. ered species? �YES Exampks that Mould apply to column 2 ' ❑ ❑yam '❑No • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ Dyes ONO • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Application of pesticide or her more than twice a year, other ❑ than for agricultural purposes. T ❑ �es ONO • Other impacts: W/-Iw 400 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO ES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑yam ❑No • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ land (includes cropland, hayfields. pasture, vineyard, o(chard. etc.) 8 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No icultural land. proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ d]Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent instillation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems(e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping; or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES ES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO > . (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ _ DYes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whethir man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their . enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Droject components that will result in the elimination or significant :re-ening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C3 Ko • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO XES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ C3 ❑Yes DNo contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Yes ❑No • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No I IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION i 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONOeES t The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Ycs ❑No • Other impacts: OF ❑ DYes ❑No of i9inae� �° 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Ei Moderate Large Mitigated By14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy)<NO? DYES Impact Impact Project Chang Examples that would apply to column 2 - Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑Nc ❑ ❑ Dyes DNc • Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's source)*0 fuel DYES energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 D Dyes ❑Nc • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of 11 any form of energy in the municipality. D Dyes ❑N( • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ transmission*or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve ? major commercial or industrial use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON, • Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? WO • OYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 D [Dyes ON • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive 1) facility. ❑ D Dyes 0 • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) _ _ D DYE 01,• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. D Dyes &• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ noise screen. ❑ D Dyes ❑t • Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples OYES Ida I column Examples that would apply to 2 XD ❑Yes C31• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ substances(i.e. oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Dyes ❑ • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ forth (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ' D Dyes D • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ gas or other flammable liquids. D Dyes ❑ • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. 0 D Dye C • Other impacts: 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Mitlp ed Bpact � OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate l.ar�e Y • Will proposed action affect the character of the existing Commun' t Impact Impact ProleCt Change ONO S Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑No ❑ ❑Yes , project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. �` ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) - ❑ ❑Yes ONO ' • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. X❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controv rsy ONOelated to �ES potential adverse environmental impacts? ct or If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as 3 of Im atiaLarge ctt Proceed to Part 3 If You Cannot Determine the MagnitudeP Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacts) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact($) may b mitizated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact ted or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change{- 2. Describe(if applicable)haw the impact could be mitiga 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) APPENDIX 10 ASSESSMENT VALUE 10, fOC� Southold Town Hall Scott A. Russell, Chairman z 53095 Main Road Darline J. Duffy, Assessor p.0. Box 1179 Robert I. Scott Jr. Assessor �~ Telephone (516) 765-1937 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF ASSESSORS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 116-1-3 Current Assessment : 28,600 Current Acreage : 104. 5 Current Taxes : 18 ,281. 43 (1994-95) Proposed Uses : Vineyard Ac. Assessment per Assessment (total) Section 1 2ac Res . 1800/500 2300 18. 84 ac. 16. 84 farm op. 250/ac 4210 Section 2 2ac Res. 1800/500 2300 11. 96 ac. 9. 96 farm op. 250/ac 2490 Town Park 37. 47 0 0 Horse Farm 5. 67 1800/500 4135 Residential Parcels 6 waterfront 3500/lot 21000 6 farmview 2500/lot 15000 1 "mini-estate" 3 . 5 1800/500 3000 54 ,435 New Assessed Value (Est . ) : 54,400 New Taxes (Est . ) : 34 , 773. 08 (1994-95) APPENDIX 11 REFERENCES Appendix 11 References Nitrogen assessment was conducted by A. Bopp as a Masters thesis; the following is a list of his references and others used for Indian Shores: A Joint Symposium of the American Physiological Society and The American Society of Zoologists held at Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 1972, Nitrogen Metabolism and the Environment, Academic Press, London. Baier, Joseph H., and Kenneth A. Rykbost, Nov. - Dec. 1976, The Contribution of Fertilizer to the Groundwater of Long Island, Groundwater, Vol. 14, No. 6. Bopp, Arthur, Nitrogenous Compounds in the Environment: A Site Assessment, NYIT, Department of Environmental Technology, May 1994. Beek, J. and M. J. Frissel, Simulation of Nitrogen Behaviors in Soils, Wageningen, Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1973. Engineering Resources Co., Inc. (ERC), 1978, Nassau - Suffolk Bi-County Regional Water Quality Management Planning Peconic/Flanders Bay Environment Report, Cambridge, MA. ERM-Northeast - Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc., 1983, North Fork Water Supply Plan, Suffolk County, New York. Flipse, W. J. Jr., Jan. - Feb 1985, Nitrogen Isotope Ratios of Nitrate in Groundwater Under Fertilized Fields, Long Island, New York, Groundwater Vol. 23, No. 1. Holzmacher, McLendon, and Murrell, P.C., 1982,Section 201 Wastewater Facility Plan, Incorporated Village of Greenport and Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, Selected Plan Report. International Symposium on the Biological Oxidation of Nitrogen in Organic Molecules, 2d, 1977, University of London. Koppelman, L. E., 1978, The Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan, Volumes I and II. Koppelman, L. E., 1982, The Long Island Segment of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program. National Research Council (NRC), 1978, Nitrates: An Environmental Assessment, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, undated, Draft Long Island Groundwater Management Program, Executive Summary. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Marine Resources, February 1992, Tidal Wetlands Land and Use Regulations, 6NYCRR Part 661. New York State Department of Health, 1969, The Long Island Groundwater Pollution Study, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Petrovic, Dr. A. Martin, March 1989, Golf Course Management and Nitrates in Groundwater: The Real Story, Draft for review by the American Society of Golf Course Architects. Petrovic, Dr. A. Martin, undated, The Fate of Nitrogenous Fertilizers Applied to Turf Grass, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, Submitted to the Journal of Environmental Quality, Not For Publication. Porter, K. S., 1983, Nov. - Dec. 1980, An Evaluation of Sources of Nitrogen as Causes of Groundwater Contamination in Nassau County, Long Island, Groundwater Vol, 18, No. 6. Porter, K. S., 1983, Southold Demonstration Site, New York State Fertilizer and Pesticide Demonstration Plot, Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Starr, Robert C. and Robert W. Gillham, Nov. - Dec. 1993, Denitrification and Organic Carbon Availability in Two Aquifers, Groundwater Vol. 31, No. 6. State of Maryland Sediment and Stormwater Division (MSS), undated, Wetland Basins For Stormwater Treatment: Discussion and Background, provided by Cornell Cooperative Extension Service, Riverhead, New York. Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS), 1992, Brown Tide Comprehensive Assessment and Management Program, Volumes I, II, and III, (BTCAP). Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS), 1982, Report on the Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals in Groundwater, North Fork of Suffolk County: Bureau of Water Resources, Hauppauge, New York (August, 1982). Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS), 1987, Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, Volumes I and II. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Public and Environmental Health Laboratory, 1994, Monitoring Well Sampling Data. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Article 6), Realty Subdivisions, Developments, and other Construction Projects. Swoboda, Allen R., August 1977, The Control of Nitrate as a Water Pollutant, EPA Document 600/2-77/158. Thompson, Benjamin F., 1962, History of Long Island from its Discovery and Settlement to the Present Time, Volume II, Ira J. Friedman, New York. USDA Soil Conservation service, 1975, Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York. U. S. Geological Survey, 1989, Availability and Historical Development of Groundwater Resources on Long Island, New York, An Introduction, Water Resources Investigation Report 88-4113. Van Es., Harold M., undated, Nitrogen and the Environment, Cornell Cooperative Extension Bulletin 218. Viets, Frank Garfield, 1971, Factors Affecting the Accumulation of Nitrate in Soil, Water, and Plants, Agriculture Handbook No. 413, USDA, Washington, D. C. GENERAL REFERENCES Draft Outline of Recommendations Southold Town Stewardship Task Force, Southold, New York September 30, 1993. Private Water Systems Standards, SCDOHS, County of Suffc lk, New York July 1992, rev. Peconic Land Trust, General Brochures, Southampton, New York NYSDEC • Part 661 Tidal Wetlands • Wildlife Resource Center & NYS Natural Heritage Program Environmental Engineering and Sanitation 9th Ed., Salvato, J. Wiley 1992 Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, Corbitt, McGraw Hill 1989.