The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMarina Bay Club Supplement 1988 SUPPLEMENT TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND APPLICAIT'S SUBMISSION FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MARiNABAy Club FIRST ANd MAIN STREETS NEWSuffolk, NEW Yoek �no�wi I own o D JAC PLANNING CORP. Prepared for Southold Town Planning Board SUPPLEMENT TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND APPLICANT'S SUBMISSION FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MARINA BAY CLUB FIRST AND MAIN STREETS NEW SUFFOLK, NEW YORK Location 6+ acre site on east side of First Street including Main Street, west of Cutchogue Harbor in the New Suffolk #15 School District in the hamlet of New Suffolk in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Lead Agency Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Applicant Marina Bay Club Associates 350 Fifth Avenue, Room 1826 New York, New York 10118 Richard T. Carr, President ( 212) 868-4777 Principal Preparer JAC Planning Corp. One Overlook Avenue, Suite 210 Great Neck, New York 11021 Jean A. Celender, President (516) 487-4549 with: Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell , P.C. , water supply, wastewater and site engineers Dunn Engineering, P.C. , traffic engineers Niego Associates, architects B.Laing Associates, ecology and permits Dravo Van Houten, Inc. , marina engineers Henry E. Raynor, Jr. , planning consultant John J. Hart , Esq. , Pelletreau and Pelletreau, attorney Contact Person Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Jill Thorp, Secr . to Planning Board (516) 765-1938 Preparation Date: March, 1988 Acceptance Date: 1988 Deadline Date for Comments : 1988 INTRODUCTION The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed reconstruction of the Northfork Shipyard called "Marina Bay Club" was prepared by JAC Planning Corp. (July, 1987) . The project site, approximately 6.0 acres, is located on the east side of First Street including Main Street in the hamlet of New Suffolk in the Town of Southold. The applicant is Marina Bay Club Associates , the owner of the property. A SEAR public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement was held before the Southold Town Planning Board on November 9 , 1987 at Town Hall on Main Road. Approximately 20 residents and interested parties from the New Suffolk area attended the hearing and/or submitted written comments for the record. Prior to the hearing, during the comment period, about 20 copies of the DEIS were submitted and distributed to Town officials, state and county agencies and area residents . The DEIS was also available for public inspection and review at the Town Clerk's office in the Town Hall . Based upon information received subsequent to the filing of the DEIS, comments made at the public hearing, and during the period that the hearing record was open (until November 19, 1987) , certain aspects of the proposed action were reevaluated and the scale of the project was reduced, resulting in some minor modifications to the site plan. 1. The purpose of this report is twofold; ( 1 ) to present a modified, reduced proposed action and evaluate potential environ- mental impacts in the form of a Supplement to the Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement , and ( 2) to provide the applicant 's responses to substantive comments received on the Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement in order to assist the Town in preparing the Final Environmental Impact Statement . This supplemental report, prepared in accordance with the Planning Board 's directive at their January 12 , 1988 meeting, appends the original DEIS and evaluates a modified proposed action. Existing environmental conditions, alternatives assess- ment and impacts of the original proposed plan and alternatives are unchanged as presented in the DEIS . Only revisions to the proposed action and impacts of this revised action are addressed in this supplement to the DEIS. This supplement also contains the responses to all substan- tive comments and concerns expressed with respect to the DEIS. The applicant 's consultants have reviewed the minutes of the hearing (Appendix A) and written comments received (Appendix B) during the comments period. Substantive comments received by the Town from involved agencies and interested residents have been summarized, addressed and translated into a question and answer format in this Final Environmental Impact Statement . The comments have been grouped according to topic area to aid the discussion of relevant issues and responses. 2_ REVISED PROPOSED ACTION As a result of recent Planning Board meetings and the SEQR public review process, a revised proposed action is proposed by the applicant to mitigate environmental concerns and objections of the Lead Agency, other cognizant agencies and the public. This revised proposed action is contingent upon site plan approval by the Planning Board. The following is a discussion of the modifications to the plan, as related to the plans presented in the DEIS, and impact evaluation of the revised proposal . The revised site plan and grading plan are contained in pockets in the rear of the report . A. Restaurant The plan presented in the DEIS included a 250-seat restaurant in Phase I and 150-seat conference room addition in Phase II for a total seating capacity of 400 persons. The applicant has now eliminated the Phase II conference room expansion and reduced the number of seats in the restaurant to 225 with the potential addition of a 75-seat outdoor dining facility to be utilized only seasonally if weather and business conditions warrant . The 225 seats in the restaurant include those (75) in the bar holding area. The proposed restaurant is sized similarly to existing North Fork facilities such as Soundview, Claudio's and the Seafood Barge and is consistent with other restaurants in the Southold area (See Appendix B) . The size is based upon recommendations of Dr. Stephen A. Mutkoski of Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration in a restaurant feasibility study conducted for the project . 3. The decrease in seats and elimination of the 2 ,000 square foot building addition reduces total parking requirements from 176 to 156 spaces. The plan will now provide an excess of 21 spaces to meet peak parking demands . The revised proposed action, by decreasing the seating capacity of the restaurant , will result in the following: a. parking requirements are decreased from 176 to 156 spaces b. number of patrons utilizing the facility on a daily basis are reduced based upon a 25% decrease in seating capacity C. total building coverage is decreased from 23, 580 ( 15 . 7%) to 23 ,005 ( 15 . 3%) All of these factors combined lessen the intensity of devel- opment on the site which further reduces the minimal environ- mental impacts associated with the previous proposed action as assessed in the DEIS. B. Sewage Treatment Plant/Water Supply System The sewage treatment plant has been relocated from the support/utility building to the boat storage/repair building as requested by area residents. Relocation of the plant required a slight increase ( 1 , 425 square feet) in the boat storage/repair structure in order to accommodate this operation. It was previously proposed in the DEIS to utilize a 30-foot horizontal well screen to supply the reverse osmosis (RO) system. Based upon coordination and review of the system with the SCDHS the preferred alternative is to utilize both an on-site well and the horizontal well screen, which will each be a standby for the other. The proposed action will draw a 4. maximum flow of 100 gpm of well or bay water through either a well approximately 110 feet deep or a 30-foot horizontal well screen. The well would be situated near the southwest corner of the site and would consist of about 100 feet of casing and 10 feet of screen. The well and the horizontal screen will each be a standby for the other. The horizontal screen will be buried approximately 4 feet below the mean sea level and above the dredged bay bottom, located in a sand and ground envelope with the riprap at the north end of the marina, approximately 30 to 90 feet offshore and within the applicant 's property. The water from either source will be pumped to reverse osmosis (RO) units housed in the boat storage warehouse located in the southwestern corner of the development . In addition to the reverse osmosis system an iron and manganese removal system will be constructed to be used when necessary. The plant will have sufficient capacity to treat 100 gallons per minute to remove 80 percent of the iron and manganese or 95 percent from the 70 gpm reject stream. The treatment unit will process 100 gpm, producing 30 gpm of potable water and 70 gpm of reject water. This reject water will have about 1 . 4 times the total dissolved solids (TDS) than the bay water, or approximately 42 ,000 mg/l TDS. The elevated TDS reject water will then be piped to an outfall distribution diffuser located within the marina. The potable fresh water will be treated as wastewater after its use and will be recharged on site. This fresh water 5. recharge will eventually flow underground to the bay and will add to the available natural supply by replacing some of the local fresh water which now flows to the bay. The pipe feeding from the diffusers will span the southern- most pier 's pilings below the depth of average low tide. The pipe will be equipped with discharge points along this pier, which will discharge the brine solution along a line perpen- dicular to the shore at about 20 feet intervals to a distance of at least 200 feet off-shore. The approximate depth of water at this location is 10 feet . The brine, having a concentration of approximately 42 , 000 mg/1 , will be more dense than the bay water and, therefore , will readily mix with the surrounding bay water but will also tend to sink. With 10 discharge points along a 200 foot pipe, the quantity of flow at each point will only be 7 gpm, slightly greater than from a normal garden hose. The dilution would be great and will cause no problems . There are several alternatives or subalternatives for water supply. The limited freshwater supply in New Suffolk has been recognized and reserved for existing and future potable water use by those other than Marina Bay. The existing availability could be increased by more of a skimming system than is available from existing wells but Marina Bay has opted to propose a system which would enhance and not degrade the fresh water available on this peninsula. Looking at the alternative which would be best for both Marina Bay and others in the area, an upland source and 6. transmission main from the source to New Suffolk is preferable. Such a basic system would consist of 2 small wells on a plant site north of N.Y.S. 25 in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, a water main along New Suffolk Road to New Suffolk Avenue and on New Suffolk Avenue to First Street . This alternative would or could be capable of supplying potable water to all of the homes and businesses en route. This alternative would include the wells, each with a capacity of 100 gallons per minute, either of which would pump after treatment for pH correction and hydrochlorin- ation into a hydropnematic tank. From the tank the water would be transmitted to New Suffolk and Marina Bay Club by approxi- mately 1-1/2 miles of 8 inch C900 PVC water main. The estimated cost of this system, including a small pump house and a standby engine generator, is $220,000 for the plant and $180, 000 for the main or a total of $400, 000. Even though this alternative is more expensive than the proposed reverse osmosis plus iron removal systems, the operating costs would be less . With the private Marina Bay Club system the water facility cost will approximate $280,000 while the Upland alternative with transmissions would approximate $400,000. The operating and maintenance costs could be about $4 per thousand gallons less or about $15,000 per year. The Upland alternative would have capacity to serve at most 60 private homes as well as Marina Bay and would be expandable without major plant costs to at least 100 homes or more. Implementation of this alternative would require Town of Southold and others, i .e. , Village of Greenport or the Suffolk 7. County Water Authority to move promptly on implementing the satellite system. It is possible to construct the above alternative privately, but it is unlikely that Marina Bay Club wishes to be in the water business. They would be agreeable to contribute at least the cost of their system toward implementation of the Upland supply and transmission system. It is the developer 's intent to minimize the effects of this development on groundwater and surface water quality and quantity in the area. In order to do this, a reverse osmosis water treatment unit will be installed on-site to treat salty water, available in large quantities below and adjacent to the site. The proposed action is not expected to have any adverse effects on the quantity of fresh potable water available to the general public in the area surrounding the development . The proposed implementation of a reverse osmosis system to treat saline well or bay water will have no impact on the groundwater in the region since the fresh groundwater will be undisturbed. The project site is located adjacent to and includes surface water and underwater land of Cutchogue Harbor. This surface water body, classified by the DEC as "SA" for shellfishing purposes, is saline and tidal and flows into the larger Peconic Bay. A test well was drilled and sampled in November 1986 at depths of 82 and 106 feet . The quality of the bay water and beach filtrate was sampled in December, 1986. The results of the tests performed by H2M reveal that the surface water and 8. beach filtrate is typical salt water, and the well water is salt water plus iron and manganese. The revised Table 4 contains the results of three lab analyses for the locations sampled on the Marina Bay Club site. The well results at 82 feet were not as complete as the one shown for 106 feet but constituents checked were similar. The proposed action will have no impact on the surface water surrounding the development based upon the brine discharge having no adverse impact on the bay as detailed in the DEIS . Based on the revised site plan, the design water supply and sewage demands for the maximum daily flow for the development, including possible extension of service to Bonnies Restaurant are recalculated as follows : Maximum Potable Maximum Design Type of Use Water Demand Sewage Flow Restaurant ( 225 seats) and 7,875 gpd 6, 750 gpd outdoor dining (75 seats--seasonal ) 1 , 500 gpd 1 , 125 gpd Retail Stores (50% wet/50% dry) ( 1 , 330 sq. ft . ) 120 gpd 120 gpd Laundromat (3 machines) 1 , 200 gpd 1 , 200 gpd Marina ( 137 slips) 8,905 gpd 2 ,055 gpd Boat Storage and Utility Building ( 13 ,450 sq. ft . ) 807 gpd 538 gpd Miscellaneous (wash down, cleaning, steam, etc . ) 3,000 gpd 2,000 gpd PROJECT WATER NEEDS 23,407 gpd 13,788 gpd Sonnies Restaurant ( 150 seats) 5, 250 gpd* 4,500 gpd* TOTAL PROJECTED WATER SUPPLY NEEDS 28, 657 gpd 18, 288 gpd * Not part of the proposed, however, their demand has been included in the analysis since it may be possible to service this facility, if approved and an agreement can be reached between the involved property owners . 9. REVISED TABLE 4 RESULTS OF LAB ANALYSIS ON BAY WATER, BEACH FILTRATE AND TEST WELL MARINA BAY CLUB NEW SUFFOLK, NEW YORK Bay Beach 106' Parameter Water Filtrate Test Well Iron 0. 18 0. 36 6. 3 Manganese 0. 05 0.09 1 . 7 Total Solids 2 . 98% 2 . 89% 2 . 43% Nitrates <0. 1 <0. 1 0 . 1 Chloride 1 . 24% 1 .09% 1 . 41% pH 7 . 9 7 . 8 6 . 5 Calcium 360 . 360 . 405. Suspended Solids 190 . 140. 87. Barium 0. 2 <0 . 2 0. 2 Magnesium 1 , 110. 1 ,060. 1 ,040. Sulfate 2 , 100 . 1 ,800 . 1 ,900 . Hardness 5 ,430. 5, 150. 5, 276. Zinc 0. 02 0.05 0. 69 Silica 1 . 50 <1 .50 21 . 5 Strontium 6 . 5 6. 5 6.0 Total Alkalinity 106. 106. 78 . 10. While the total seating capacity of the restaurant facility has been reduced, the water and sewage design flows have slightly increased due to the difference in standard flow rates assigned to meeting/conference rooms versus dining room seats. Therefore, the maximum potable water demand for the proposed action increased 325 gpd from 23,082 gpd to 23,407 gpd. Simi- larly, wastewater flow requirements increased insignificantly by 450 gpd from 13, 338 gpd to 13,788 gpd. Both the water supply and wastewater systems can accommodate the slightly higher design flows without producing significant environmental impacts . The systems are designed with a certain factor above maximum demand to be able to accommodate flows above this amount . As an example, the reverse osmosis unit has the capability to provide a maximum flow of 57,600 gpd, while the estimated maximum demand based upon the proposed action and Sonnies will be 28, 657 gpd. C. Site Access/Traffic Several modifications were made to the site plan related to access features and parking configurations . These changes are as follows : 1 . The 15 parking spaces in the area of the travel-lift were reconfigured to permit better flow and thus separate activity patterns of vehicles from operation of the travel-lift . There was no loss in the number of parking spaces. This area has been designated for employee parking only and the site plan now reflects this intention. 2 . The southerly access driveway was modified to permit only access for employee and emergency vehicles. This driveway will be roped off to restrict all other vehicles. Thus, very little traffic is anticipated to use this exit driveway. 11. 3 . The northerly access driveway will prohibit right turns in order to discourage vehicles from heading north and west to utilize King Street, a predominantly residential street . Instead, it is proposed to direct vehicles to utilize Main Street to travel west from the site. 4 . Four handicapped parking spaces, in accordance with town requirements are now designated on the revised site plan. Based upon the revised scaled down plan, the trip generation figures, distribution patterns and projected volumes have been recalculated by Dunn Engineering, P.C . Thus, the following revised figures and table as listed in the Traffic Impact Study are included herein: 1 . Figure 4 , Directional Distribution of Site Destined Traffic . 2 . Figures 5 , 6, 7 and 8 . 3 . Table 3, Additional Site-Generated Traffic . It should be noted that little traffic is anticipated to use the southerly exit point to the site based upon the revised operation for use only by employees and emergency vehicles. All traffic exiting via the northerly access driveway is shown turning south to gain access to Main Street . This driveway will be controlled with "NO RIGHT TURN" regulations and the appropriate signing. In this manner, the residential community's integrity will be protected from marina traffic. As a result of the examination and review of the traffic engineering related comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Marina Bay Club, the following actions and revisions were made: 12. L 1 . Table 3 . Additional site generated traffic was revised to reflect the specific changes to the site plan of : a. the addition of 75 outdoor dining seats to the proposed restaurant in Phase I , b. the deletion of the proposed 2 ,000 sq. ft . addition to the restaurant in Phase II and C. the addition of 1 ,425 sq. ft . of space to the boat storage area in Phase I . These revisions in the size of the project resulted in a decrease in the traffic volume and a lessening of the overall traffic impact of the proposed development on the surrounding street and highway network. 2 . Figures 4 , 5, 6, 7 and 8 were modified to reflect changes in the site generated traffic and to show traffic that is expected' to utilize the secondary exits to the property at the property's northern and southern boundaries. It should be noted that the designation of the parking facilities along the eastern side of the boat storage facility for employee parking only reduces the amount of traffic that will utilize the southerly access driveway. 3. The parking lot layout on the easterly side of the boat storage facility in the vicinity of the travel-lift was revised to enhance the traffic and safety aspects and to designate the parking solely as employee parking. 4 . The examination of the location of the southerly access driveway to the site in terms of its relationship to the existing town launching ramp and the beach reveal that no conflicts from the traffic standpoint are anticipated. Since the locations of the beach and the launching ramp are a sufficient distance to the south of the proposed exit driveway, no inteference will occur . 5 . As a result of our review of the northerly access point for the site, it is recommended that right turns out of the northerly site be prohibited to minimize any intrusion of the site generated traffic into the residential areas. 6 . Data has been provided on the Saturday A.M. , Sunday A.M. , and Sunday P.M. traffic volume that supports our examination and analysis of the peak composite hours of traffic activity. Specifically, the additional tables submitted substantiate the volumes generated by the Marina and the reasons for selecting the Saturday peak as the heaviest composite hours to be examined. 13. REVISED TABLE 3 ADDITIONAL SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR SAT. PEAK HOUR 8 :00-9 :00 4:00-5:00 1 :00-2 :00 P.M. PROPOSED ACTION ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT - 137 Slip Marina 14 11 16 12 30 19 (66 Permanent Slips 71 Transient Slips) - Existing Post Office/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail and Offices ( 1 , 330 Square Feet) - 300 Patrons, 225 3 3 14 8 35 45 Indoor Seats and 75 Outdoor Seats; 6, 800 Sq. Ft . Restaurant ( 160 Additional Dining Seats) - Boat Storage 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 11 ,875 Sq. Ft . ) - Support/Utility Bldg. 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3,000 Sq. Ft . ) TOTAL ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC 18 14 30 20 65 64 Note: The traffic generated by the boat storage facility is included in the figures for the marina. Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 14. ROUTE 25 38% a� D O I' Y J O W W 1096 W Z MAIN STREET o 50% 38% 73% 50% 8896 1296 quo 50% ............ .. � ;:.. ..'. ........... ... NEW F- W 10 N SUFFOLK '..•.•r. AVENUE 5 _ H Cr N LL � FLASHING SIGNAL FIGURE 4 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE DESTINED TRAFFIC Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 15. ROUTE 25 6(10) 10 D a XXX AM PEAK HOUR w (XXX) PM PEAK HOUR Y J O LL U. M EMdll*.3 W i0 z MAIN STREET 8(9) 4(6) 8(13) 4 6(9) 12(23) 1(2) ..........::. . ::: N E W SUFFOLK Uj a AVENUE �= 1(1) oft U.1 �s F- m N FLASHING SIGNAL FIGURE 5 ADDITIONAL SITE—GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 16. ROUTE 25 22 N N all 0 a Y J 0 L LL M 8 •• N i- 3 N W z MAIN STREET m 30 22 43 quo 30 so 7 28 NEW W SUFFOLK cc AVENUE y — I— Q FLASHING SIGNAL FIGURE 6 ADDITIONAL SITE—GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY PEAK HOUR Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 17. ROUTE 26 8(11) to 0 XXX AM PEAK HOUR O cc (XXX) PM PEAK HOUR Y J O W LL. V1 1(2) 3 W z MAIN STREET a r X7(16) 6(8) 12(16) 7(1) 20(28) , 2(2) =:.�:.:;•:. .:::•: :; ;: 12(16) ';•• NEW F. .. W .. :_X SUFFOLK ¢ °' ------- AVENUE 1(t ••• a� U. co FLASHING SIGNAL FIGURE T ADDITIONAL SITE—GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 18. ROUTE 25 24 N , 93 O _ Im Y J O LL LL Is .. a 3 N W z MAIN STREET J-O 32 24 47 f— 4---�. E X 32 57 33 ................ —� N E W 1— WN SUFFOLK ': AVENUE c 3 Q � U. FLASHING SIGNAL FIGURE 8 ADDITIONAL SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES SATURDAY PEAK HOUR Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 19. 7. Our review of the need to stabilize the existing roadways resulted in the determination that no additional improvements are required beyond those roadway improvement recommendations that were included in the traffic impact study. 8 . Our review of the magnitude of the additional traffic and the percentage of the additional traffic reveal that a review of the additional site generated traffic should not be undertaken solely on the basis of the percentage increase because this presents a warped and unrealistic statistic. 9 . The methodology utilized in the traffic impact study is correct in terms of examining the composite traffic volumes that will occur. Thus, our reexamination revealed that the project will have no adverse traffic impact on the adjacent street network. D. Drainage The residents in the area are concerned with the probable effects of the proposed grading and filling on occasional flooding that occurs on First Street . Since the parking lot is to be raised 3+ feet , it could cause flood water to site on First Street for an extended period and possibly extend the areal limits of flooding. In order to mitigate this, H2M Group has proposed construction of a positive overflow system to permit any excessive flooding on First Street to be returned to Cutchogue Bay. The revised drainage plan, shown in the rear pocket and incorporated into the site plan, has been reviewed by Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Southold and reflects his suggestions regarding the design concept. The drainage plan now includes the installation of two sets of leaching pools, at the low points, both east and west of Main Street on First Street . These would have to be shallow basins, 20. but would enable low intensity storms to be handled. In addition to the leaching pools it is proposed to construct overflow pipes from the area of the low points, through the Marina Bay Club site, with a discharge into the bay. These overflows would be set at a grade of 3 inches above the street grade. Therefore, these would only function when there are over three ( 3) inches of stormwater on the street . This type of solution alleviates the concern of runoff from every storm event being channeled into the bay. Only rainfalls which produce significant flooding would utilize the overflow. As shown on the plans, the bay end of the overflow pipes would be provided with a tide gate to prevent bay water from entering the system. Additional concerns were expressed relative to the effect of the grading plan on the stability of the shoreline to the south. The revised grading plan contours in the area of the fueling station and timber sheetpile bulkhead indicate that the dredging in the southern boundary will be such as to not disturb or alter the natural contours of the existing neighbor 's sea bottom. E. Dredging Required and Loam to be Removed The marina engineers, Dravo Van Houten, have calculated volumes of material to be dredged from various dredging areas as shown on the accompanying figure. They broke down the estimates to distinguish those areas reachable from a landside dragline crane and those areas requiring a crane mounted on a barge using a clamshell . This same barge/crane combo will also be needed to remove the rip rap and concrete breakwaters at the eastern side of the existing facility. 21. 120" -< <� �JT1n\- / r'— 1 II 1 1 Ise' C �•71e LnN G@ 1 1 P11/EG I 1 N 1 ; � 90 � 11 D2 (�relcw.Nau-r� s � a i NoeTH L-INe Nr5 en.r ►-INe ]�3 o p A o '1 j - ---- ---- a C1 .a o C r 7 V A Dl 30 4 LL _ a o X — No Dredging I , D4 / PL ,\ Required B I -Yr . I _LB11• o ' SE.s' �i L11, 14 1 1 'I I W j ' � fiMT1JG 111 y i (Ir) - I ,_ -- --_. NY3 �a QA.r "-PC Al A2 I iA•au.I�. Sr+..t srw..oe��u -o 7 - b 45■ � - ILp• MAR/NA b.Ay GG�b As:o ciA rEs SO✓T.+pLO %eWN3N//� NGw �f�iPOGK /Vs,v Yo.Q,C, MAP OF BULKHEAD AND PROPOSED DREDGING AREAS MA2i/VA LAY-our Ora o �u■■�■� REPLACED BULKHEAD Van Hc)utNEW BULKHEAD FEs. 7, 3.272-oo/'- 2 'Ts✓ /L•!..u,/leo Al DREDGING AREA (CALCULATED BY DRAVO) The volume for each area, based on a dredged depth of -10. 0 MLW inside the marina basin and to -8 . 0 MLW outside (Areas Al and A2) , is as follows : Using Dragline Using Crane Area From Shore (C.Y. ) Area On Barge (C.Y. ) Total Al 1 ,400 A2 400 A3 4,000 D3 1 , 200 B1 4 , 300 C1 800 B2 3, 700 C2 200 B3 900 C3 2 , 300 D1 700 D2 1 , 400 D4 500 TOTAL DREDGING VOLUME 16,900 c.y. 4 , 900 c.y. 21 ,800 c.y. The volumes were based on the bathymethric survey prepared by H2M Group and the amount of fill required to build up the site. The DEIS provided estimates of 27, 000 cubic yards of dredge spoil (to be used as fill ) and 3 , 300 cubic yards of loam and topsoil to be removed that does not meet compaction criteria. The estimate of the amount of material to be removed was based upon two test holes . Additional test borings were conducted in January, 1988 to further refine these initial estimates . Based upon the new data, it was determined by H2M Group that 5,500 c.y. of unsuitable material would have to be removed from the site. The amount of fill required to raise the site, accounting for the loss of volume within the leaching pools (not in the initial estimate in the DEIS) , was recalculated to be approxi- mately 21 , 800 cubic yards, instead of the 27,000 cubic yards stated in the DEIS. 23. F. Construction Staging The project is now single-phased. Originally, in the DEIS it was proposed to build the marina expansion and addition to the restaurant for meeting rooms in a second phase, Phase II . With the elimination of the restaurant expansion it is no longer proposed to stage the marina portion of the project since the upland facilities will be built all at once and sufficient parking will be constructed to accommodate the full-sized marina. G. Grading/Aesthetics With the revised proposal being single-phased, the entire proposed action is now shown on one sheet, SP-1 . The previous SP-2 sheet , which was the second phase, now contains grading details and profiles to clarify site elevation changes . The site has been raised from an existing grade of approximately 4 . 5 to a new final grade of approximately 8 . 5 (average of 4 . 0 feet) by sloping the grade up from the existing property lines at First Street and Main Street at an angle of repose of approximately 30 . This slope will be achieved by using standard plantings and rock beds similar to those seen on most Long Island roadway shoulders. This sloped area will be heavily landscaped with English Ivy, rhododendron and perennial flower beds to present both a visual and physical barrier to pedestrians and force them to use all of the designated walkways and roadways to traverse the site and the surrounding streets. This fill area of approximately 4 feet will be achieved with the dredging material from the Bay in the area of the new piers 24. and bulkheads . This fill will likewise provide good, clean fill for the new drywells being installed as part of the new site work. Final grades near the fueling station were revised in response to a question raised regarding stabilization of the southerly beach line. Construction of a timber sheetpile bulkhead from the mean high water elevation (seaward) and return landward along the southern boundary for about 45 feet to meet another type of retaining wall will not result in any adverse impacts on the stability of the remaining shoreline. Dredging and final grading will be done so as to not disturb or alter grades of the existing adjacent properties, both upland and underwater areas . 25. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS CONSTRUCTION AND SITE-PLAN Comment No. 1 - The site plan does not include a complete metes and bounds (survey) description of the property and the underwater land. Response No. l - The site plan shows metes and bounds as surveyed by Roderick Van Tuyl , P.C. , land surveyors, dated August 21 , 1982, and being last revised March 7, 1986. The grant lines for underwater areas are depicted on the site plan according to records in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. Comment No. 2 - Will the boat storage be an on-call facility? Response No. 2 - No, the boat storage building will not be an on-call facility. Comment No. 3 - It would be a positive action to move the boat storage building more to the interior of the property and thus further away from First Street . Response No. 3 - Niego Associates reviewed this option and found that for all practical purposes, the boat storage building cannot be moved further east . The setback from Main Street was increased from 15 feet in previous preliminary plans to 25 feet shown on the proposed plan and is the maximum setback that can be achieved. As a result of comments received during the environmental review process, the plan has been revised (see rear pocket for latest plan dated November 18, 1987) to relocate the sewage treatment plant from the support/utility build- ing to the boat storage/repair building. There was not sufficient excess space in the boat storage building to accommodate the treatment plant, as requested by local residents, without slightly enlarging the building ( 1 ,425 square feet added) . In order to accommodate the sewage treatment plant and to provide sufficient area between the building and water for the proper operation of this building, the location of the structure can not be changed. Further, the building is located in almost the exact location where its larger predecessor once stood and thus the front and side yards are identical to the previous boat storage building. 26. Comment No. 4 - The boat storage building may not house the shower, laundry, and reverse osmosis water treat- ment plant under Type 5 construction require- ments . If another type of construction is being proposed, the document should state this. Response No.4 - The New York State Building Construction Code relative to Type 5 and all other construction types were reviewed by Niego Associates together with Occupancy Group C4-Storage which would be the classification of the Boat Storage Building. This building will not be Type 5 construction, but would be a prefabricated metal frame build- ing such as a Butler Building of Type 2B con- struction classification. There is no indica- tion that Type 2B construction would restrict housing the showers, laundry and RO system in this building. The only height limitation is that under the Zoning Ordinance, namely 35 feet . The Building Code has no height restric- tions for a one-story high bay type building. Comment No. 5 - Page 1 . 8 refers to development of retail stores, where would they be? Response No. 5 - The mention of retail stores on page 1 .8 of the DFIS refers to the existing retail uses in the post office building on the site, specifically the delicatessen and yacht sales stores . The proposed action proposes to maintain these retail operations with no additional retail development . Comment No. 6 - The threshold of noise and light are low in New Suffolk, therefore lighting should be subdued and mechanical systems insulated. Response No.6 - All parking lot lighting shown on the site plan has been designed so that there is virtually no spill-over onto any adjacent properties. The lighting has been designed to provide for 0.5 lumens/sq. ft . over the parking lot at the outer edges of the property. Thus, the effect of lighting on any adjacent properties, whether commercial or residential, will be minimal , if any. The only mechanical system that creates any ambient noise level is the HVAC system for the restaurant . This system will be a split system so that the only portion of the system to be located outside of the building will be the air conditioning compressors . Fortunately, they will be located 27. adjacent to the restaurant , which is at the extreme easterly portion of the site. This is the farthest it could possibly be placed rela- tive to any adjacent or surrounding residences . Therefore, the affect of noise on adjacent properties will be minimal . Comment No. 7 - There may be areas of New Suffolk which could use some of the 150 truckloads of topsoil to be removed from site. Response No. 7 - Some material is expected to be removed from the site since it is comprised of fill that is unsuitable for the proper operation of the storm- water drainage and treated wastewater recharge facilities. Unsuitable material will be disposed of off-site at the Cutchogue Landfill or may be utilized by the applicant on another project site. The decision will be based on the quality of the unsuitable material and the status of the applicant 's other project . Comment No. 8 - Removal of 3, 300 cubic yards of topsoil and loam will require a mining permit from the Town Board. What provisions will be made to provide adequate topsoil for landscaping? Response No. 8 - A mining permit will be required from the Town of Southold and from NYSDEC if the material is to be used off-site. It would appear that the applicant will not require a NYSDEC mining permit if the material is disposed of at the Cutchogue Landfill . Adequate topsoil for landscaping exists at the site. Comment No. 9 - The proposed deposition site of the 3, 300 cubic yards of fill expected to be removed from the subject property should be identified. Would approvals be required from the Town where the fill would be deposited? Response No. 9 - The proposed deposition site is an 11-acre vacant parcel located on County Road 58 and Northville Turnpike in the Town of Riverhead, also owned by the applicant . The only approval needed from the Town of Riverhead is an approved site plan for the property. In the event an approved site plan is not obtained from River- head prior to removal of the material from the Marina Bay site, it will be disposed of at the Cutchogue Landfill or utilized by the applicant elsewhere. 28. Comment No. 30- The document should address the hazards asso- ciated with placing two 10,000 gallon fuel storage tanks underground, particularly ground that is likely to be saturated with water. Response No. 10- Article XII of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code indicates that above or below-grade storage of "hazardous materials" , including gasoline and diesel fuel , is acceptable provided that the tanks meet Suffolk County requirements. Under- ground tanks that are within groundwater must be constructed of either single-walled fiber rein- forced steel or cathodically protected double steel . In addition, four monitoring wells must be provided to monitor the tank. For this project, a below-grade fuel storage tank was recommended due to aesthetic concerns. Comment No. 11- Fuel tanks should be installed aboveground. Below ground storage may not be legal in a marina area. Response No. li- See response to Comment No. 10. Comment No. 12- Has consideration been made regarding the installation of double-walled tanks with leakage detection? Response No. 12- Yes, the fuel storage tanks will meet Suffolk County requirements for proper tank installation and monitoring system as indicated in the response to Comment No. 10. Comment No. 13- No fire wells were indicated. The design should be cleared with the fire department . Response No. 13- Page 4 . 30 of the DEIS includes a discussion of specific fire safety measures as presented on the site plan and approved by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Cutchogue Fire District. The site plan shows three wells to be located near the restaurant , fuel tanks and boat slips for firematic purposes. Comment No. 14- The document and the site plan should state what portion of the 500 feet of bulkheading will be new and which portion will be replacement. The site plan should also show the existing shore- line as well as the proposed bulkheading line. The present and proposed elevations of the beach area at the southerly part of the project should also be shown. 29. Response No. 14- The entire 528+ feet of shoreline on the project site will be bulkheaded using timber sheetpiles. Including return walls shoreward, the total length of bulkhead will be approximately 770 linear feet as indicated on the "Map of Bulkhead and Proposed Dredging Areas" in the Supplement to the DEIS. Much of the existing bulkhead is deteriorated and requires replacement. Approxi- mately 95 1 . f . of the existing bulkhead in front of the existing machine shop building could have been salvaged, however, the raising of existing site grades necessitates replacement of this portion as well as the deteriorated sections. Approximately 455 S . f. of the proposed bulkhead is new bulkhead ( "new" meaning where it present- ly does not exist) in the central to southerly part of the site which is presently beach area. Comment No. 15- The document states that the southerly beach line needs to be stabilized, but provides no evidence in support of this. Will bulkheading this beach have any negative impacts on the stability of the remainder of the shoreline to the south and west? Response No. 15- A timber sheetpile bulkhead along the southerly beach line will only run from the mean high water elevation (seaward) and return landward along the southern boundary for about 45 feet to join another type of retaining wall . Dredging along the southern boundary will be such as to not disturb/change the natural contours of the existing neighbor 's seabottom. (See attached Grading Plan in rear pocket . ) Comment No. 16- The support utility building housing the sewage treatment plant does not observe the 500 foot buffer from habitable areas as required by New York State and mentioned on page 4. 38 . The type of construction should be noted. (Type 5 con- struction may not exceed one story in height. ) Response No. 16- Page 4 . 38 indicates, "a minimum radial separa- tion of 500 feet is required between an aeration tank and habitation, or areas of significant use by the public, unless special designs or consid- erations warrant reduction" (emphasis added) . The proposed sewage treatment plant, while moved from the support utility building to the boat storage/ repair building, will be housed; conse- quently, the 500-foot setback can be reduced to 150 feet from areas of "substantial habitation" . See response to Comment *4 on the type of build- ing construction utilized. 30. Comment No. 17- The lighthouse effect exceeds height require- ments and must have ZBA approval as does the restaurant expansion. Response No. 17- The lighthouse effect will not require ZBA approval since it will meet the 35-foot maximum height limitation as established in the Zoning Code. Comment No. 18- The site plan shows parking spaces in the path the travel-lift must traverse from the slip to the boat storage building. Response No. 18- The revised site plan (see rear pocket) has reconfigured the 15 parking spaces in this area which will be for employee parking. Comment No. 19- Figure 9 in the DEIS should be revised to reflect proper street designations. Response No. 19- The base map utilized in Figure 9 is from the State Department of Transportation that is not always accurate, especially on local streets that may be mapped but unpaved. The discrepency is noted and a revised map is included in the Appendix of this report . It does not change the conclusion that there would be no significant adverse impact on land use as a result of the project . Comment No. 20- Will stormwater runoff be contained on-site during general construction? Will there be sufficient protection to prevent runoff from the dredged spoil as it is being dumped, stored and distributed during construction? Response No. 20- Drainage of stormwater runoff during construc- tion will continue as it does under present conditions. That is, percolating through the soil , overland runoff eastward into Cutchogue Harbor and ponding in areas where the grading is poor and can not be absorbed into the ground. This poor drainage system will be significantly improved when a developed system of drywells are installed and thus operating to recharge runoff into the groundwater and ultimately Cutchogue Harbor. However, during construction at the time of dredging operation, the spoil material removed and stockpiled for dewatering and final grading will be placed in a temporary deposition area 31. that will be graded within a low dike and staked with hay bales at its outer edge to prevent the transport of runoff and sediment from the dredged material back into Cutchogue Harbor. See also response to Comment No. 27 . DREDGE MATERIAL Comment No. 21- The amount of dredge material , at 27,000 cubic yards, is a significant amount . Response No. 21- It was estimated by the marina engineers that a minimum of 17,000 c.y. would be required to maintain an 8-foot water depth in the marina basin. The extra amount of material ( to 21 ,800 c.y. ) is based upon the grading plan and the elevations required to meet FEMA regulations. It was felt that it was preferable to dredge to the higher amount ( to a depth of -10.0 MLW inside the marina basin and to -8.0 MLW outside of the basin for a total dredged volume of 21 , 800 c.y. ) rather than trucking in fill . All of the dredged material is anticipated to be utilized on-site. Comment No. 22- An analysis should be made of soil tests that were taken of the marina bottom (Appendix B) and placed in the body of the document with refer- ence to the significance of the findings with regard to heavy metals and pesticide residues. Response No. 22- Samples of the bottom sediments were collected, analyzed for potentially "toxic" substances and these analyses were included in Appendix B of the DEIS. The samples were all analyzed according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA.) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods. This methodology was the appropriate procedure to use, and includes metals analysis by Atomic Absorption (AA) and organics analysis by gas chromatograph (GC) . However, the methodology proposes two distinct preparatory or sample digestion procedures prior to the AA or GC analysis. The first method is complete or total digestion. In this method, a portion of the sample (e.g. , 10 grams) is subjected to very concentrated (e.g. , pH 3 .0) solutions of hydrochloric (HCL) or nitric (HNO3) acid and then heated to a temperature just below its boiling point ( 250° F) for one or two hours . This extraction procedure removes virtually all metal salts and 32. oxides from solids in the sample. The extract is then analyzed by AA to provide data which describes the total metals content of a sample in milligrams (ppm) or micrograms (ppb) per kilogram of sediment. Extraction procedures for total organics includes washing the sample with various organic solvents. It is then injected into a GC for detection of specific organic compounds, especially herbicides and pesticides. The complete digestion methods provide informa- tion on the total concentrations of substances in marine sediments, but it does not have a regulatory or direct environmental implication. The second preparatory method for the chemical analysis of sediment samples is known as the "Extraction Procedure" or the E.P. Toxicity Test (40 CFR Part 261 Appendix II) . The E.P. extrac- tion involves mixing the sample with a mildly acidic (pH 4 . 5 to 5.0) solution of acetic acid, and allowing it to stand for 24 hours at a temperature between 680 and 109° F. This extraction procedure is also followed by AA analysis for metals and GC for organics. Its purpose is to more closely approximate natural conditions by determining what portion of metal and organic contaminants are likely to be leached or released from the sediment to the environment during dredging and become biologi- cally available. It is these free compounds which can cause environmental damage by inter- fering with normal biochemical processes of fish and shellfish. It should be noted that these laboratory conditions are much more stressful than those occurring on-site where the pH is near neutral at 7 . 8 and 7.9 units and water temperatures rarely exceed 680 (see DEIS H2M laboratory data) . To be classified as E.P. Toxic, a substance must have metals or organics concentrations equal to or greater than the levels (40 CFR 261 . 24) contained in the following table. This table also demonstrates that none of the sediments were E.P. Toxic. 33. Maximum E.P. Toxicity Compound Concentration On-Site Standard Arsenic ND ** 5 .0 Barium 0. 65 100. 0 Cadmium 0 .003 1 .0 Chromium ND 5. 0 Lead 0.03 5 .0 Mercury ND 0. 2 Selenium ND 1 .0 Silver ND 5.0 Endrin ND 0.02 Lindane ND 0.4 Methoxychlor ND 10.0 Toxaphene ND 0. 5 2 , 4-D ND 10.0 Silvex ND 1 .0 * Parts per million (milligrams per liter) ** Not Detected, below detection limits Since none of the sediments tested are E.P. Toxic, no significant levels of metals will be released to either the harbor during dredging or leached to groundwater during disposal of the dredged material on the project site. No toxic or hazardous organics were detected in the sediments, and so, will not be released in any amounts to the ambient environment . The total digestion method did reveal the presence of some metals in the sediments at levels up to 160 ppm for lead (Pb) . However, as demonstrated by the E.P. Toxicity tests, these sediment constituents are "locked" into the solid matrix and will not leach or be released into the environment in environmentally active forms or in significant amounts. Since the material is not "toxic" , no mitigating measures are required. Comment No. 23- If significant quantities of toxic substances exist in the dredge material, the document should address the following concerns: a. How will the dispersion of toxic materials in the water be mitigated during the dredging operation? b. Should the "contaminated" portion of the dredge spoil be used for fill or should it be disposed of in a more environmentally acceptable manner? 34. C. Is dredged material suitable for fill because of the presence of heavy .metals which may leach to the water table? Response No. 23- See response to Comment No. 22 . Comment No. 24- The proposed expansion of the marina further out into the bay may cause further degradation (presence of heavy metals) of the bay bottom. Mitigative measures to prevent such degradation should be discussed. Response No. 24- See response to Comment No. 22 . Comment No. 25- The impact to shellfish in the area to be dredged was not mentioned. If scallops are present , the area should be opened before dredging to make the shellfish available for human consumption or reseeding. Response No. 25- The DEIS acknowledges the presence of shellfish on marine sediments to be dredged as a result of the proposed action. The applicant is amenable to allowing the harvest of these species in a timely manner for the purposes of reseeding other local shellfish populations. However, the manner in which such an operation would be conducted would have to be specified by the Town of Southold (with the cooperation of the applicant) . Comment No. 26- The amount of dredged material exceeds that necessary for the marina and appears to be a mining activity. Response No. 26- The first test hole data supplied by Niego Associates and later tests conducted in January of 1988 both revealed from 0.5 to 1 .5 feet of unsuitable material that must be removed from the site prior to placing any fill . The amount of dredging and amount of fill required were designed to be roughly equal . With respect to the raining issue see responses to Comments #?, #9 and #21 . 35. Comment No. 27- The document should provide details of the proposed method of upland deposition and drain- age of dredge spoil , including details of any proposed spoil dikes or impoundment areas, and an assessment of potential surface water impacts associated with overland flow of sediments into the harbor. Response No. 27- The dredging operation will remove approximately 21 ,800 cubic yards of material to create a marina with an 8 to 10-foot draft. As the first of this dredge material is removed by a landside dragline crane it will be formed into diked enclosures of varying sizes. The dikes will be approximately three feet high and 15 feet wide ( 2. 5 to 1 .0 slopes) . The outer edge of the enclosure will be surrounded by staked hay bales. Additional dredge material , removed by dragline crane or by a clamshell from a crane mounted on a barge, will be stockpiled within the temporary dikes. As the diked areas are filled, waters will rise to the top and "decant" off over the dike edge or percolate through the material . The runoff will then be intercepted by the staked hay bales which will filter out the finer solids prior to its entering Cutchogue Harbor. The dredge material will be eventually graded to raise the site (3.45 acres) elevation approximately three feet. The impoundment area will be regularly monitored by the project 's environmental consultants to ensure the integ- rity of the system during construction. . Finally it should be noted that the use of mechanical rather than hydraulic dredging techniques will greatly reduce the amount of water in the dredge spoils and, therefore, massive dikes or water filtering systems are not necessary. Comment No. 28- It is recommended that all dredging operations take place from October through March to reduce potential for unnatural , nutrient-induced, algae blooms, and to avoid potential disturbance to colonial waterbirds, which are known to nest and forage east of the site, in the vicinity of Cutchogue Harbor and Nassau Point . Response No. 28- The applicant proposes to schedule dredging operations during October to March in order to mitigate fish and wildlife impacts. As shown on page 2 . 26 of the DEIS, the dredging work has 36. approximately a four month duration and, there- fore, can be scheduled during the late fall and winter months. Two bottom samples, 100 grams each (one with 20 grams + of bottom algae attached to sediments) , and one water (750 ml) sample were collected from the site in December 1987 . The bottom samples were mixed with half of the water sample and shaken, mixed and aerated for 10 minutes at 19 C. The samples were then stabilized at the same temperature for 48 to 96 hours. The remain- ing half of the water sample and decanted water from the two sediment samples were then analyzed by a New York State Certified Laboratory ( labora- tory report in Appendix B) for nitrates, ammonia, phosphates (salts) and total phosphor- ous (salts and organics) . The intent of this testing is to simulate the warmer temperatures of summer and agitation/aeration to which exist- ing on-site bottom sediments will be subjected during the dredging operation. The test results for the bottom sediment sample determined the presence of no additional nutri- ents ( in salt form) in the water column before and after the elutriation. Additionally, no additional total phosphorus in organic form occurred in the water column. The elutriate sample with algae demonstrated 0. 5 ppm of phosphates released from the seaweed tissue to on-site waters. No additional nitrogen compon- ents were detected. When the additional phos- phates from the limited amount of bottom sea- weeds (assuming 1 ,000 grams per square meter, 1 .4 million grams, 31 ,000 lbs or 15 tons of seaweed on-site) is diluted in the 0.555 billion gallons of water passing the site on each tide (see Response #106) the 0. 5 ppm elutriate sample concentration will be diluted to 0.000046 ppm (46 parts per trillion) . In the absence of significant additional nutrient salts and organic forms of phosphates which could be metabolized to salts, no nutrient blooms could occur due to the dredging operation. Nesting and foraging of shorebirds will not be adversely affected by the dredging operation. The land-based dredges will be confined to the site and so will not disturb any nests "near" the site. Foraging of birds on the site may actually improve. This will be due to any marine biota carried to the landward portion of the site with dredged sediments and small volumes of water in the dredge bucket and the probable increased presence of small fish 37. scavenging among the increased suspended sediments associated with dredging. Comment No. 29- The document should explain the proposed method and timetable for all dredging. Response No. 29- See response to Comments No. 27 and 28. GRADING Comment No. 30- The raising of the site by 3 feet may accentuate already existing flooding problems on adjacent properties. Response No.30- The raising of the site will not accentuate flooding problems as the proposed action includes installation of a drainage system to handle excessive flooding on First Street (see detailed discussion in the Supplement to the DEIS contained herein this document) . Comment No. 31- Raising of the site may cause visual impairment, both from land (current homeowners) and water side. Response No. 31- The raising of the site from its present grade elevation of +5 .0 feet to an average grade elevation of 8 .0 feet, a change in height of approximately +3.0 feet, will cause no visual impairment from the landward areas because the elevation of the first floor of these existing structures is equal to or greater than the elevation of the parking lot . The same is true from the water side as well , since the elevation of the present dock area (el . 10.0) and the new additional dock area will be the same. Comment No. 32- Is the 28-foot height measured above sea level or above the 10-foot proposed grade elevation? Response No. 32- The highest building height is 29 . 5 feet for the boat storage building, not 28 feet as noted in this comment . The 29.5 foot height is measured above the proposed final average grade elevation of the parking lot of 9.0 feet surrounding the boat storage building for an actual elevation of 38 . 5 feet . The height of the building, for zoning compliance, is measured above the legal street grade elevations, which are fixed and will not change. With respect to the project site, the average street grade elevation is 4. 35 feet (Main Street to end of property along First Street) . A maximum building height of 35 feet added to this calculates a maximum height at elevation 39 . 35 feet . Therefore, the proposed 38. height is below the maximum building height . No buildings will exceed the height of the boat storage building and thus, all building heights are in compliance with the zoning code. Comment No. 33- The DEIS does not state how the parking area will be graded and landscaped to ameliorate the 3 to 5 or 6-foot difference in site elevations between the subject property and the neighboring properties, including First Street . A site grading and road profile showing north, south, east and west elevations should be included in the DEIS. Response No. 33- The landscape plan has now been prepared and is located on drawing SP-2 (see rear pocket) . The sloped areas along First Street have been graded using a combination of low rock and crib wall designs. Comment No. 34- There is need for a full scale grading plan to describe use of dredged material on site. In addition, how much left over material would there be and how will left over dredged material be handled? Response No. 34- Full-sized grading plans have been submitted to the Planning Board by the applicant on November 23, 1987 . There will be no excess dredged material . Comment No. 35- The grading and drainage plans and discussion provided (Figure 12) in the DEIS are insuffi- cient for technical evaluation. We recommend the applicant prepare a detailed assessment of the site 's surface runoff, and prepare drainage control plans that include the following: 1 . Delineation of existing and proposed grades 2 . Delineation of drainage area 3 . Complete drainage calculations 4 . Leaching pool and overflow system design specifications 5 . Boundary delineation of all impervious and pervious surfaces 6. Test hole data, indicating depth to ground- water Response No. 35- Questions 1 through 5 are addressed on the revised grading and drainage plan. Question 6, test hole data, including depth to groundwater is contained on the following table. The average groundwater elevation of 0.38 feet below mean sea level was obtained by dividing the 39. EXISTING GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CALCULATIONS MARINA BAY CLUB Test Hole # Surface Groundwater Groundwater (Keyed to Map) Elevations Depth ( in Feet) Elevations 1 3 .0 5 -2 .0 2 5. 5 5. 5 0 3 4 . 6 5 -0. 4 4 4 . 7 5 -0. 3 5 5 . 3 -- -- 6 5. 5 -- -- 7 5 .4 5 0. 4 8 4 .0 5. 5 -1 . 5 9 4 . 5 5 -0 . 5 10 4 . 6 5 . 5 -0. 9 11 4 . 5 5 -0 . 5 12 4 . 1 4 . 5 -0.4 13 4 . 3 4 0 .3 E1 4 . 7 5 -0. 3 E2 4 . 7 4 . 5 0. 2 E3 4 . 7 4. 5 0. 2 E4 4 . 0 4 0 E5 4 . 8 5 -0. 2 E6 4 . 0 4 . 5 -0 . 5 TOTAL -6.4 Source: H2M Test Hole Location Map found in Pocket II . 40. total groundwater elevations by the number of groundwater readings ( 17) . NEW YORK STATE GRANT LINES Comment No. 36- The question of ownership of the underwater land should be discussed in depth. The terms of the New York State grant and the project 's bound- aries in relationship to the grant area should be presented in the body of the document. Response No.36- It has been determined that the land under the waters of Peconic Bay and Gardiners Bay is vested in the State of New York. Cite: Town of Southold v. Parks, et al . , 41 Misc. 456; 84 N.Y.S. 1078; aff 'd. 90 N.Y.S. 1116; aff 'd. 183 N.Y. 513 . By grant dated January 22, 1838, the State of New York conveyed the land under water as described in the grant to the predecessors in title of the present owner. This grant gives to the present owner the right not only to erect a dock or wharf, but to fill in the lands for the purpose of commerce. Reference is also made to the letter from the Office of General Services to Mr. Thomas Lowry, dated November 3, 1986 ( included in Appendix B) . Comment No. 37- The Suffolk County Tax Maps show the underwater lands adjacent to this project as being in the ownership of Southold Town. Response No. 37- The Suffolk County Tax Map has no authority to determine ownership to property. This has already been determined by the courts of the State of New York. Comment No. 38- The project may exceed N.Y. State grant lines. Response No. 38- This is true, but irrelevant. The riparian owner has the right to erect wharfs and piers in front of his property for his own use and the use of the public. Cite: Town of Islip v. Stewart Powell , et al . , 78 Misc. 2d 1007; 358 N.Y.S. 2d 985. . Town of Hempstead, et al . v. Oceanside Yacht Harbor, Inc. , 38 A.D. 2d 263; 328 N.Y.S. 2d 894 ; aff 'd. 346 N.Y.S. 2d 529 . 41. Hugenot Yacht Club v. Lion, 43 Misc. 2d 141 ; 250 N.Y.S. 2d 548. Moyer v. The State of New York, 56 Misc. 2d 549; 289 N.Y.S. 2d 114 . The question as to the area which may be used by the riparian owner is a factual one. Regarding the riparian owner 's right of access, the right of access may be shared with others intent on crossing land under water for purposes unrelated to the use of the upland, but the right of access cannot be expanded beyond purposes denoted by the term "access" ; the exercise of the right does not extend to purposes extrinsic to commerce and navigation, nor may the right be used so that the public navigation is impeded. By itself, the erection of more than one dock is not unreasonable, if they are necessary to the upland owner 's enjoyment of his riparian right of access; nor is the right of access restricted to the personal use of the upland owner who may lease his property and docks to third parties . The right of access comprehends a reasonable, safe and convenient use of the foreshore for navigation, fishing and such other purposes as commonly belong to the riparian owner, exercised in a reasonable manner. The scope of what is a reasonable, safe and convenient use of the upland owner 's riparian rights has been gradu- ally defined on a case-to-case foundation. It is clear that the right of access includes the right to build a pier, dock or wharf for the upland owner 's use, or for the use of the public or more than one pier or dock (Barnes v. Midland Railroad Terminal Co. , 218 N.Y. 91 , 97-98, 112 N.E. 926, 928-929) . The right of access may not be used to impede public navigation and must be "reasonable" . (Town of Brookhaven v. Smith, 188 N.Y. 74, 87, 80 N.E. 665, 670) . We must look to the character and size of the owner 's activities on the land under water to determine whether under the circumstances they represent a "reasonable" exercise of its right of access. 42. Since early times in the history of our State, State policy has been directed toward encouraging the private development of waterfront, subject only to the condition that the use be reasonable and not obstructive of navigation. (Town of Brookhaven v. Smith, supra. ) The question is one of "reasonable use" by the upland owner. Here the use is "reasonable" and consistent with the marina use along the Long Island shoreline. Comment No. 39- Once the grant lines are determined, a restric- tive covenant should be placed to limit further boundary extensions. Response No.39- See response to Comment No. 38 . Additionally, the riparian owner is not willing to restrict his rights. Comment No. 40- Page A-15 of the DEIS refers to "apparent appropriation of public bottoms for private use. " Response No. 40- By reason of the grant from New York State, the owner has the right to fill in that area and/or build out as long as he does not interfere with navigation; such use is not an appropriation. Comment No. 41- The developer will confiscate 3 acres of prime scallop area bay bottom which belongs to New York State. Response No. 41- The applicant 's attorneys have spoken with two representatives from the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Services, regarding this concern. Initial conversations were held with Michael Chezik, the acting Supervisor of the Department 's office in New Jersey. He referred questions to his representative on Long Island, Mr. Thomas Sperry. According to Mr. Sperry, in years prior to the arrival of the brown tide three years ago, the waters around Shelter Island and Southold provided most of Long Island's scallops. Most of those waters are still able to produce scallops should the brown tide ever leave the area. The salinity of the water is fairly high now and shellfish predators are beginning to invade the area. Any impact from the marina project will 43. be negligible, according to assistance received from Clifford Day (Supervisor to Mr. Sperry) . (See letter in Appendix B. ) Will the project impact the scallop beds? The answer is no. Comment No. 42- Should a portion of the applicant 's underwater land be set aside as an environmental buffer to Town waters? Response No.42- There are no "Town waters" . There is no prece- dent by either case law or common law for a riparian owner to set aside part of his property as a buffer. REGULATORY Comment No. 43- The mitigation section of the DEIS does not adequately address problems discussed in previous sections. Response No. 43- The mitigation section is meant to be a summary of the measures discussed in greater detail in the impact section (Section 4) of the report under the appropriate environmental factor. Comment No. 44- Project impacts do not discuss "worst-case" scenarios, " reducing the need for mitigations. Response No. 44- According to the latest revision (6/1/87) of the statewide DEC regulations implementing SEQR, worst case, or catastrophic impacts to the environment are only necessary in the review of such actions as an oil supertanker port, a liquid propane/liquid natural gas facility, or the siting of a hazardous waste treatment facility. In other words, for actions which do not have the potential for catastrophe, the analysis need only be of reasonable effects. Comment No. 45- Where would the waste from the pumpout stations be disposed of? Response No.45- The waste from the pump-out station will be treated by the on-site sewage treatment plant . Comment No. 46- The historical point-of-view has not been ade- quately covered. 44. Response No.46- A great deal of consideration has been given by the applicant for developing a project in con- cert with the established history of this site as a shipyard and marina. A detailed explana- tion of the historical context of this project was presented in Section 2, which is beyond the level of detail normally discussed in an impact statement . Comment No. 47- A citizens group should be formed to work with the developer in order to resolve these issues. Response No.47- The developer has shown since the outset of the project a spirit of cooperation with residents and officials in resolving concerns important to the community and continues to express his on- going desire and commitment to work closely with them. Comment No. 48- Roadway changes require approval from the State ( 239K) because of high percentage of site changes, etc. Response No. 48- No approval is required from the New York State Department of Transportation pertaining to access to this site. Discussions with Mr. J. P. Hartofil of the Traffic Section of the New York State Department of Transportation revealed that the state has no jurisdictional responsibility on the roadway network surrounding the site of the proposed Marina Bay Club. However, since the Suffolk County Department of Public Works has the responsibility for the maintenance of Main Street to its easterly terminus at the site property, discussions were held with Mr. Richard LaValle and Mr. Paul Campagnola of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. The Suffolk County Department of Public Works advised that their responsibility was limited solely to the maintenance aspects of Main Street and as such, the proposed project does not come under its review requirements under the 239K aspects. Therefore, the sole jurisdiction responsible for access to and development of this site is with the Town of Southold. However, it is suggested that the Town submit the site plan to the Suffolk County Department of Public Works to allow the County to confirm this formally. Comment No. 49- No mention is made of use of the facility by commercial fisherman and any preferential rate they may receive. 45. t Response No.49- Consideration was given to commercial fishermen in the design of the marina and slips will be available on a first-come first-served basis to fishermen who want to rent permanent slips. There will be no preferential rate given to any group. Comment No. 50- 1987 Trustee permits (permits over Trustee "owned" Bay Bottom) currently preclude use of TBT bottom paints on all but aluminum hulls and outdrives. Any expansion or new facilities in the wetlands (Chapter 97) jurisdiction will likely require this. Project sponsors may wish to comment on this and their willingness to preclude sale of TBT for general hull use until formal rules are imposed by Federal or State Law. Response No. 50- There will be no use of TBT bottom paints as they will be precluded soon by Federal law. Comment No. 51- Citing of agreement with 44 CZM policies is misleading when size and scope of project are in direct contrast to CZM intent to not burden the marine ecosystem. It will not aid commercial fishing as cited in policy #4 and could possibly, be a detriment . Policies 7, 8, 9, 10, 30 and 31 are in contravention. Response No. 51- The project will aid commercial fishing in that the proposed renovated and enlarged seafood restaurant will increase the demand for fresh seafood, which will help stimulate the local commercial fishing industry. The proposed project is not in contravention of Policies 7, 8, 9, 10, 30 and 31 as it will not Introduce hazardous wastes into the coastal area, and coastal fish and wildlife habitats will be preserved. The proposed project will expand recreational use of these resources by increasing access and availability of slips over present conditions. Comment No. 52- Two project stages should not be approved at once but as two separate actions. 46. Response No. 52- The proposed project was presented originally in a two-staged approach for several reasons, including ( 1 ) to disclose to the lead agency the entire, overall action contemplated by the developer, and ( 2) to avoid segmentation in the spirit and intent of SEQR that requires, in most cases, project segments to be treated as one overall action. This comment is now moot in that Phase II , expan- sion of the restaurant, has been eliminated and the revised proposal is single-phased. Comment No. 53- Has the environmental or legal issue of the permanent berthing of boats of considerable size, such as houseboats, been addressed? These boats would essentially become waterfront condominiums . Response No. 53- There is no intention of permanent berthing or houseboats utilizing this facility and the applicant has agreed to covenant and restrict same with the New Suffolk Civic Association. Comment No. 54- Should N.Y. State Department of General Services be listed for agency action relating to either underwater lands or dredged material? Response No. 54- No, the Department of General Services is not an involved agency and the function of reviewing an action related to usage of underwater land and water-dependent activities is the responsibility of the New York State Department of State under the Coastal Zone Management Program. REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER SYSTEM Comment No. 55- The Suffolk County Department of Health should be notified in order to review previous water supply suggestions, specifically for an off-site supply which could make potable water available to area residents ( for example use of the open field adjacent to the schoolhouse) . Response No. 55- The proposed water supply system will be sub- mitted in a separate engineering report to the Suffolk County Health Department for review and comments prior to commencing construction. 47. Comment No. 56- Alternative water supply systems should be addressed in the DEIS. One alternative should be the installation of a conventional well , at an adequate distance below the water table, to be used in conjunction with the RO system. Response No. 56- A test well was drilled into brackish water at the site. Test results showed excessive iron which would require another major treatment system in addition to the reverse osmosis system. This cost would be unnecessary utilizing the proposed water supply system. One alternative supply for the Marina Bay Club would be the utilization of under-utilized upland property within New Suffolk, such as the school property. Based on a yield of 0. 25 million gallons per day per square mile, the available supply in New Suffolk south of School House Creek would average approximately 20,000 gallons per day (50 acres at 393 gpd) . Since some 60 existing homes would pump about 31 , 500 gpd and consume about 14, 200 gpd, it would only leave about 6,000 gpd for Marina Bay. Since some wells have experienced problems, and no valid argument can be made that the added withdrawal would not damage existing supplies, this alternative is not feasible. The second and most logical alternative is an upland source which could be as far north as above Main Road (NYS Route 25) in Cutchogue. This would require about two miles of watermains plus a plant , but could supply all of New Suffolk's domestic needs plus fire protection at an added cost for storage and booster pump facilities . We believe a plant consisting of two wells, treatment , controls, standby power and appurtenances would cost about $300,000, resulting in a total cost of about $600,000. Comment No. 57- Explain why the RO well screen site was chosen. Response No. 57- The horizontal screen built into the "jetty" was selected to provide a protected inlet--protected physically by the sand and stone, protected from debris, etc. , by water filtering through the sand and stone. We will use a well screen with the inlet slot opening designed based on the size of the sand/gravel surrounding it . Comment No. 58- What is the salinity, pH and general composition of water pumped from the well? 48. Response No. 58- The water to be pumped from the proposed well will be the same as that found in this section of the bay. Variations in quality are expected to be insignificant . Comment No. 59- Clarify the discrepancy between the brine concen- tration of the RO reject water of 30,460 mg/l estimated in the Executive Summary and the 42,000 mg/l in Section 4 . 2 . 2 . Response No. 59- There is no discrepancy between the Executive Summary and Section 4 . 2 . 2 . In both sections there are two brine concentrations stated. The 42 ,000 mg/l estimate is the brine concentration of the RO reject water from the treatment unit prior to mixing with the ambient bay water. The 30,460 mg/l is the brine concentration of the RO reject water estimated at bay bottom, accounting for mixing and diluting with bay water. Comment No. 60- Clarify the discrepancy between page 2 . 17 and the Executive Summary concerning the amount of RO product water, either 30 gpm or 70 gpm. Response No. 60- In the third paragraph on page 2 . 17 of the DEIS there is a typographical error stating that the product water to be depressurized and chlori- nated is 70 gpm. The correct number, as indi- cated in other portions of the text on both page 2 . 17 and the Executive Summary, is 30 gpm. Comment No. 61- What is the salinity, pH, temperature and general composition of reject water at the point of discharge into the Bay? Response No. 61- The reject water, as noted in the DEIS, will have a 40% increase in concentration of all elements or compounds which exist in the raw water. Equipment for pH adjustment will be provided in preliminary treatment, but we do not believe it will be necessary to modify the existing pH of 7. 8. Any minor change in pH due to solids increase will quickly dissipate due to the large quantity of water in the marina portion of the bay. Comment No. 62- Is 6-foot below bottom location of RO unit pumping water from the bay or from the aquifer. 49. Response No. 62- The locations of the well screens will be three feet below the level of mean low water surface, so the water pumped will be from the bay. Comment No. 63- Has a RO system been previously used in Bay waters and if so what has been its performance? Response No. 63- Reverse osmosis is used primarily for the produc- tion of potable water in arid regions. In such applications, sea water (total solids in excess of 45,000 mg/1) is treated to produce fresh water. More recently, it has been used on islands that do not have a well defined aquifer system. These sea water reverse osmosis units typically process water with total solids concentrations 50 percent greater than those experienced in Peconic Bay. The lower the total solids concentration, the higher the level of performance from the reverse osmosis unit . Peconic Bay water is typical of saltwater treated by existing reverse osmosis units, and should pose no unexpected problems for the unit . Comment No. 64- Use of RO system will create a precedent . Response No. 64- Although the use of a reverse osmosis unit for the Marina Bay project is unique to the area of New Suffolk, the technology is not untried in Suffolk County. There are a number of projects currently in the development stage in the Southold area, along with an existing facility on Lake Montauk. The Suffolk County Health Department has been testing a reverse osmosis unit in Southold for three years with much success. The study is for the removal of speci- fic compounds including organics and nitrates, but is very similar to a saline reverse osmosis unit from an operational standpoint . The reverse osmosis process is a proven technology. Comment No. 65- Will brown tide enter the RO system and clog membranes? Response No. 65- The brown tide phenomenon is still under investi- gation by a number of agencies. The proposed reverse osmosis unit is to receive bay water through a horizontal well screen buried three feet below low tide. In effect , the two to three-foot layer of sand will act as a filter, 50. resulting in the removal of any algae encount- ered in the bay. In addition, the reverse osmosis units are equipped with an ultrafiltra- tion unit to remove small suspended solids that penetrate the sand layer. This ultrafiltration unit is a prefilter to the reverse osmosis process. Comment No. 66- RO systems are energy intensive, salt discharg- ing and maintenance plagued. Response No.66- The treatment technology of reverse osmosis has high energy costs associated with the pressure pump necessary to drive the raw water through the semi-permeable membrane. The current opera- tion and maintenance cost of reverse osmosis produced water, for the scale of operation proposed for Marina Bay, would range between $3 . 30 and $4.50 per 1 ,000 gallons. Approxi- mately 40 percent of this cost is associated with membrane replacement and labor. The reverse osmosis unit will concentrate total solids into a brine reject water, which will be piped back into the bay. A mass balance based on the recombination of reject brine water and sewage treatment plant effluent indicates that there would be no net total solids addition to the bay. The result is that roughly the same salinity levels monitored in the influent is returned to the bay environment . The typical operational reverse osmosis unit, functioning up to 18 hours a day seven days a week, requires less than 14 hours of weekly observation and maintenance. The reverse osmosis technology has been used successfully in potable applications for over 15 years. Comment No. 67- The RO system at peak performance will return 100,800 gallons/day of water that is 1 .4 times greater salinity than the normal salinity of bay water. The best way to mitigate any ecological alterations to the Bay might be to return water at original salinity levels. Response No.67- It is not practical to return each point dis- charge of water at its original salinity. For example, the treated wastewater, which is recharged to the ground near the bay, would be at a reduced salinity when compared to bay water. As seen in the response to Comment No. 66, the reduced salinity level of the wastewater and the higher salinity levels of the RO 51. discharge water would balance. Combined with the excellent flushing activity of the Bay, this balance would result in no adverse impacts to the Cutchogue Harbor ecology. Comment No. 68- Clarify the storage tank capacity. The RO Floor Plan shows the two storage tanks holding 12, 500 gallons each, where the text states that the two storage tanks will be 10,000 gallons each. The later is confirmed in the Executive Summary while the former is confirmed on page 4. 32. Response No.68- The RO floor plan on page 2 . 16 is correct with the two storage tanks each holding 12,500 gallons resulting in a total storage capacity of 25,000 gallons. The text discussions of 10,000 gallon tanks in section 2 and the Executive Summary are incorrect . The 10,000 gallon figure was a prior design value which was inadvertently not revised when the plan changed. The production capacity of the water supply system, based on 18 hours of operation, is 32 ,400 gpd. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND LEACHING POOL SYSTEM Comment No. 69- The lack of backup for the sewage treatment plant is a concern with respect to the potential effects of a system breakdown so close to the Bay. Response No. 69- NYSDEC reliability requirements are directly dependent upon the water quality standard of the stream receiving the discharge. The proposed sewage treatment plant will be designed to the appropriate reliability requirements, including standby emergency power. Comment No. 70- The sewage treatment plant will contribute to increased "brown tide" problems similar to the experiences in Riverhead. Response No.70- The treatment plant will employ an advanced wastewater treatment process, which will result in the wastewater being nitrified and denitri- fied, thereby minimizing the amount of nitrogen remaining in the wastewater. We do not antici- pate any impact by the proposed sewage treatment plant on the brown tide. 52. Comment No. 71- The location of the sewage treatment plant would cause noise, odor and light pollution and is too close to First Street. Response No.71- The DEIS indicated that the proposed sewage treatment plant would be located in the support/ utility building near First Street . Since the facility is proposed to be enclosed with an odor control system, air emissions from the building will be treated prior to being released. Silencers will be provided on the blowers to minimize noise concerns. Assuming that "light pollution" means the visual impact of incidental light from the building, this is unequivocally not a problem since the direction of the illumination can be controlled. Despite the fact that the above concerns can be adequately addressed in the site plan design, the owner is relocating the sewage treatment facility to the boat storage/repair building. Comment No. 72- There would not be sufficient area for a leach- ing field because of the presence of a meadow mat/bog beneath the surface. Other conditions may also affect the suitability of the leaching system in terms of the high water table, tidal influence, prior landfill and grade. Response No.72- The proposed treatment plant is to provide tertiary (or advanced) treatment. Leaching pools will be utilized to recharge the high quality effluent back to the groundwater. If materials encountered during the installation of the leaching pools are unsatisfactory, they will be removed and replaced with sand and gravel . The bottom of the leaching pools will be installed two feet above the groundwater table. Comment No. 73- Will an adequate distance be maintained between the STP and leaching pools and the water supply horizontal well screen? Response No. 73- The distance between the well screen and the sewage treatment plant leaching pool system will be designed in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services requirements. Comment No. 74- Will a two-foot separation between the bottom of the leaching pools and the water table be maintained? 53. Response No.74- Yes, a two-foot separation between the bottom of the leaching pool and the groundwater will be maintained. Comment No. 75- The leaching pool system is designed to handle a 2-inch rainfall . It should be designed to handle a 6-inch rainfall . Under no circum- stances should stormwater overflow be allowed to drain into the Bay except through a filtration system designed to prevent the introduction of particulate matter into Bay waters. Response No. 75- The drainage system has been designed to handle a 2-inch rainfall as required for a commercial piece of property. The 6-inch capacity applies to a residential subdivision and is, therefore, not applicable to this site. Comment No. 76- Other treatment systems should be looked at , particularly separating the waste stream so that conventional or modified in-ground systems could be used. Response No. 76- Conventional or modified subsurface systems are not permitted once the flow exceeds 15,000 gallons per day. Furthermore, the maximum leaching rate allowed using a conventional on-site subsurface system is 1 . 5 gallons per day per square foot . At this leaching rate, a significant increase in leaching pools would be required over the proposed system. Lastly, the owner could select a secondary treatment plant with a surface water discharge. This option will be implemented if the site/parking lot grade elevations are substantially reduced. Comment No. 77- Emergency generators should be provided. Response No.77- The water supply and wastewater systems will be installed with emergency generators in the event of a power outage. Comment No. 78- The document should discuss the pros and cons of the two types of sewage treatment plants that could be installed. Response No. 78- The process selected by the consultant for this project is the rotating biological disc (RBD) system. The activated sludge system has been eliminated from further consideration at this time. 54. Comment No. 79- The discussion of the sewage treatment facility should include the following information: a. Definition of Class GA groundwaters as per New York State. b. Definition of difference between total dissolved solids and suspended solids effluent concentration. Response No.79- Class GA standards are included herein in Appendix B. Total dissolved solids are those solids which are present in solution, whereas suspended solids is the quantity of material deposited when a quantity of sewage or other liquid is filtered through a filter mat in a Gooch crucible. The reader is referred to Standard Methods ( 16th Edition) for an explanation of the analytical procedures . Comment No. 80- The choice of the type of wastewater treatment system should be finalized before any approvals are granted. Response No. 80- The type of wastewater system provided will be submitted in a separate engineering report to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services• for review and approval . Comment No. 81- Percolation tests and soil borings should be taken on the site to determine whether the ground will be able to handle the projected load of approximately 17,000 gallons per day of wastewater throughout the year, in addition to any 6 inch rainfall runoff that may drain into the projected 39 leaching pools. Drainage calculations should be provided to support the projection of the 39 leaching pools. Response No.81- Soil percolation tests have not yet been conducted on the site. Design was based on test hole information supplied by Niego Associates, which revealed sand and gravel below a layer of topsoil and loam. Due to the permeable nature of soils on Long Island, percolation tests are not routinely conducted. Visual inspection of test holes is the usual method of classifying soils. The drainage calculations for the project are shown on sheet 2 of the drainage plan prepared by H2M Group. The calculations are as follows (also included on plan in pocket in the rear of the report) : 55. DRAINAGE CALCULATION FOR MARINA BAY CLUB SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK REQ'D 10' DIA. LAND CONTRIB. RUNOFF INTENSITY STORAGE REQ'D.EFF. AREA USE AREA (SF) COEFF. (IN/HR) FT DEPTH (FT) A Roof 1920 1 .0 2/12 320 Gravel 1120 0.4 2/12 75 Landscape 1120 0. 15 2/12 28 423 7 B Roof 8640 1 .0 2/12 1440 Gravel 19040 0.4 2/12 1270 Landscape 1600 0. 15 2/12 40 2750 41 C Roof 960 1 . 0 2/12 160 Gravel 20000 0.4 2/12 1334 1494 22 D Roof 3200 1 .0 2/12 534 Gravel 20960 0. 4 2/12 1398 Landscape 1120 0. 15 2/12 28 1960 29 E Imperv. 480 1 . 0 2/12 80 Gravel 19200 0. 4 2/12 1280 Landscape 960 0 . 15 2/12 24 1384 21 F Roof 6176 1 .0 2/12 1030 Gravel 17184 0.4 2/12 1146 2176 32 G Roof 6176 1 .0 2/12 1030 Gravel 2560 0.4 2/12 171 Landscape 2080 0. 15 2/12 52 1253 19 H Gravel 5984 0 . 4 2/12 399 399 6 Source: H2M, Drainage Plan, Sheet 2 entitled "Details and Drainage Tables, dated Dec. 1986 and being last revised Feb 2 , 1988 . 56. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (CONT-D. ) TABLE OF 10 ' DIAMETER LEACHING POOL STRUCTURES Note: All elevations in msl datum 12" DIA. PIPE DISTRIBUTION PIPE STR# TO STR# LENGTH INVERT EL. REMARKS 1 2 10' @#1 , inv = 4.83 Drainage Area "B" @#2 , inv = 4 . 73 Inlet #1 = el 8 . 00 E.D. /Pool = 6 ' 1 3 10' @#1 , inv = 4 .83 @#3, inv = 4. 73 1 4 10 ' @#1 , inv = 4 .83 @#4, inv = 4 . 73 1 5 10 ' @#1 , inv = 4 . 83 @#5, inv - 4 . 73 1 6 10 ' @#1 , inv = 4 . 83 @#6, inv = 4 . 73 5 7 10 ' @#5, inv = 4 . 83 @#7, inv = 4 . 73 7 Outlet @ 150 ' @#7, inv = 4 . 73 Bulkhead @Bulkhead, inv = 3 . 23 W/Tidal Gate 8 9 10 ' @#8, inv = 1 . 13 Drainage Area "A" @#9, inv = 1 .03 Inlet #8 = el 4 . 30 E.D. /Pool = 3 ' 9 10 10 ' @#9, inv = 1 . 13 @#10, inv = 1 .03 it 12 10' @#11 , inv = 4 .43 Drainage Area "C" @#12 , inv = 4 .33 Inlet #11 = el 7 . 60 E.D. /Pool = 4 ' 11 13 10 ' @#11 , inv = 4.43 @#13, inv = 4 .33 13 15 10 ' @#13, inv = 4 .43 @#15, inv = 4. 33 12 14 10' @#12 , inv = 4 . 43 @#14 , inv = 4 . 33 14 16 10' @#14, inv = 4 . 43 @#16, inv = 4 . 33 57. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (CONT'D. ) 12" DIA. PIPE DISTRIBUTION PIPE STR# TO STR# LENGTH INVERT EL. REMARKS 15 16 10' @#15, Inv = 4.43 @#16, Inv = 4.33 16 Outlet @ 180' @#16, Inv - 4.43 Bulkhead @ Bulkhead, Inv = 2 .63 w/Tidal Gate 17 18 10' @#17, Inv = 1 .83 Drainage Area "D" @#18, Inv = 1 .73 Inlet #17 = el 5 .00 E.D. /Pool = 3 ' 18 19 10' @#18, Inv = 1 .83 @#19, Inv = 1 .73 19 25 10 ' @#19, Inv = 1 .83 @#25, Inv = 1 . 73 26 Outlet @ 35 ' @#26, Inv = 1 . 73 Bulkhead @ Bulkhead, Inv = 1 . 38 W/Tidal Gate 18 22 20 ' @#18, Inv = 1 .83 @#22 , Inv = 1 .62 22 26 10 ' @#22 , Inv = 1 .83 @#26, Inv = 1 . 73 17 21 20' @#17, Inv = 1 .83 @#21 , Inv = 1 .62 21 24 10' @#21 , Inv = 1 .83 @#24, Inv = 1 . 73 17 20 10 ' @#17, Inv = 1 .83 @#20, Inv - 1 . 73 20 23 10 ' @#20, Inv = 1 .83 @#23, Inv = 1 . 73 27 28 10 ' @#27, Inv = 1 .83 Drainage Area "E" @#28, Inv = 1 .73 Inlet #27 = el 5 .00 E.D./Pool = 3 ' 27 29 26 ' @#27, Inv = 1 .83 @#29, Inv = 1 .56 28 30 10' @#28, Inv = 1 .83 @#30, Inv = 1 .73 58. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (CONT'D. ) 12" DIA. PIPE DISTRIBUTION PIPE STR# TO STR# LENGTH INVERT EL. REMARKS 30 33 10 @#30, Inv = 1 .F3- @#33, Inv = 1 .73 33 Outlet @ 27 ' @#33, Inv = '1 . 83 Bulkhead @ Bulkhead, Inv = 1 . 55 W/Tidal Gate 29 31 10 ' @#29, Inv = 1 .83 @#31 , Inv = 1 . 73 31 32 10 ' @#31 , Inv = 1 .83 @#32 , Inv = 1 . 73 34 36 10 ' @#34 , Inv = 2 . 83 Drainage Area "F" @#36, Inv = 2 . 73 Inlet #34 = el 6 .00 E.D. /Pool = 4 ' 36 37 10 ' @#36, Inv = 2 . 83 @#37, Inv = 2 . 73 34 38 20 ' @#25, Inv = 2 .83 @#28 , Inv = 2 . 62 38 39 10 ' @#38, Inv = 2 . 83 @#39, Inv = 2 . 73 34 35 10 ' @#34, Inv = 2 . 83 @#35, Inv = 2 . 73 35 40 10 ' @#35, Inv = 2 . 83 @#40, Inv = 2 . 73 40 41 10 ' @#40, Inv = 2 . 83 @#41 , Inv = 2 . 73 41 Outlet @ 87 ' @#41 , Inv = 2 . 73 Bulkhead @ Bulkhead, Inv = 1 .86 W/Tidal Gate 42 47 15 ' @#42, Inv = -0. 17 Drainage Area "G" @#47, Inv = -0. 32 Inlet #42 = el 3.00 E.D./Pool = 3 ' 42 48 28 ' @#42 , Inv = -0. 17 @#48, Inv = -0.46 42 43 10 ' @#42, Inv = -0. 17 @#43, Inv = -0. 27 59. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (CONT'D. ) 12" DIA. PIPE DISTRIBUTION PIPE STR# TO STR# LENGTH INVERT EL. REMARKS 47 49 25 ' @#47, inv = -0. 17 @#49, inv = -0.43 43 44 10 ' @#43, inv = -0. 17 @#44, inv = -0. 27 44 45 SO ' @#44, inv = -0. 17 @#45, inv = -0. 27 45 46 10' @#45, inv = -0. 17 @#46, inv = -0. 27 50 51 10 ' @#50, inv = 5 . 13 Drainage Area "H" @#51 , inv = 5 .03 Inlet #50 = el 8 . 20 E.D. /Pool = 4 ' 51 Outlet @ 70 ' @#51 , inv = 5 .03 Bulkhead @ Bulkhead, inv = 4 . 33 W/Tidal Gate 48 52 25 ' @#42 , inv = -0 . 17 @#48, inv = -0.46 60. Comment No. 82- The document does not address how the sewage pumpout station will work or its design. Will it be connected directly with the sewage treatment plant? Could another pumpout station be placed near the permanent slips to encourage its use by those boat owners who tend to be stationary or use the boat as a weekend home? Response No.82- There are two alternative methods of marine sewage collection being evaluated--separate pump-out stations or discharge piping with compatible couplings at each slip. Regardless of which system is utilized, the sewage will be treated at the advanced wastewater treatment system. Comment No. 83- The recommendation of the Southold Town Trustees to require dock leases to have discharge/suction fittings compatible with the proposed pumpout stations, thereby encouraging use of the pumpout facility, should be adopted. Response No. 83- If separate pump-out lines are selected as the means of collecting marine pump-out sewage, then the owner will require compatible fittings as part of the dock lease. Comment No. 84- Lift well construction should include separate drywell for washdown waste which will be heavy metal laden and should be separated from direct discharge. Response No. 84- Heavy metals are not anticipated in the washdown waste stream; therefore, there is no need to isolate this waste stream. Comment No. 85- Existing cesspools (for restaurant, post office) should be eliminated as a condition of the acceptance of this plan. Response No.85- The existing cesspools will either be filled in or removed by construction of the proposed project . Comment No. 86- The wastewater solute concentration on page 4 .6 of the DEIS will be approximately 1 .5% greater than existing receiving water conditions. Although this increase is rather small, chronic, but slight bottom salinity increases, could result. Salinity increases may result in an environment more suitable to a variety of 61. shellfish predators, particularly the Forbes seastar (Asterias forbesi) . Slight impacts to the shellfish industry, particularly to local waters, could occur depending on other external environmental influences. Response No.86- With respect to impacts of the wastewater solute, refer to response to Comments *59, *66, *67 and *106. SIZE OF THE PROJECT Comment No. 87- The alternatives section does not present a reduced density alternative in terms of both size and scope. The FEIS should address a scaled down version of the proposal . Response No. 87- The proposed action is in effect a reduced density alternative that developed during the planning process and represents a scaled down proposal from previous submissions. A further reduced plan is now addressed in the Supplement to the DEIS based upon comments expressed by the public and involved agencies. Comment No. 88- The project may be oversized for its location in comparison to New Suffolk current develop- ment . Response No.88- See response to Comment No. 87. Comment No. 89- Can the scope of the project be reduced and still be profitable for the developer? Is a smaller number of slips an alternative? Response No.89- See response to Comment No. 87 . With respect to reducing the number of slips, it was found that a smaller number of slips is not a feasible alternative due to the following forces driving the economics and, thus, the size of the marina: A. Physical location. Due to the project 's location in an open water, it is extremely expensive to design and construct a protected marina. B. Financial backing. The lender's requirement 's for normal underwriting criteria are for a margin of safety over and above debt service requirements for the loan. The total number of slips represent this margin necessary to secure financing for the project . 62. Furthermore, the marina's size is consistent with other Peconic Bay marinas as researched by William Yetter of American Yacht Company (See Appendix B) . The number of docking slips for each of these existing marinas is as follow: Peconic River Yacht Basin 130 Larry's Lighthouse Marina 170 Larry's Town Marina at So. Jamesport 120 Great Peconic Bay Marina 250 Strong's Marineland 128 Corrigans 100 Boatmans Harbor 120 Port of Egypt : (slips) 134 (dry storage) 140 Brewers ( formerly Pierce Yacht Basin) 90 Stirling Harbor 185 1 , 567 This gives an average of 156.7 boats per marina, and brings the Marina Bay Club in below the standard size. It is favorable especially since the Marina Bay Club will be built in open bay waters, not on a river, creek or canal , where the size might present a problem to navigation. Lastly, there has recently been substantial publicity and commentary promoting the concept of having new marinas and their expansion plans to be promoted in the "open bay" area rather than the sheltered creeks and canals. Comment No. 90- How would unskilled jobs created by the marina and restaurant facility be filled from the community when there currently exists a shortage of labor? Response No. 90- The unskilled labor shortage is largely in the adult male sector of the labor market. Unskilled labor for Marina Bay Club can be filled on a year-round basis by high school students, senior citizens and the adult female sector of the labor pool . It is also possible that if there is a problem filling jobs in the peak season such as additional waitresses and other restaurant positions, that the applicant will solicit seasonal employees from outside the area (e.g. , college students) by providing housing. This is entirely conceivable and probable given the applicant 's close ties with 63. Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration (who has authored the restaurant feasibility studies) and its available labor resources during the summer season. Comment No. 91- The DEIS is not clear in its description of the proposed restaurant seating capacity or outdoor seating area. Page 2 .7 indicates that there will be a private dining room for twenty people. There is no mention of this room on page 1 . 1 . Response No.91- The proposed restaurant seating capacity is clearly indicated in detail on page 2 .7 of the DEIS. The text on page 1 . 1 is a summary to highlight key factors and does not mention every detail explained throughout the document . The small private dining room was not deemed to be an important component of the overall restaurant renovation and, thus, was not included in the summary description. Outdoor seating was not contemplated in the DEIS plan and is now being introduced as part of the revised proposal , as a potential usage for July and August depending upon overall business conditions, weather, etc. TRAFFIC Comment No. 92- One access point to the property is too near to the exit of the beach public parking lot and should be redesigned as should the access road by the post office. Response No.92- The proposed three access points to the site provide a well separated access plan that minimizes external traffic congestion and enhances the internal traffic flow circulation. In regard to the southerly access point to the site on First Street, an exit only was proposed on the south side of the boat storage building onto First Street . However, as a result of comments made pertaining to the internal circulation and parking, the operation of this access point has been revised to serve as an exit only for 1 ) the employee parking area on the easterly side of the boat storage building and 2) emergency vehicles. Thus, very little traffic is anticipated to use this exit driveway. 64. In reference to the driveway being too close to the exit of the beach public parking lot and the Town launching ramp, our traffic engineering field investigations revealed that, along with the proposed minimal use of this exit roadway, there is sufficient distance between the launch- ing ramp area and the beach public parking lot so as not to interfere with the operations of either of these two adjacent facilities. In particular, the Southold Development Corporation owns the property adjacent to the site on the south followed by the Town launching ramp property. As a result, the southerly site exit driveway is located approximately 100 feet north of the Town launching ramp. Based on a general standard of providing a distance of approximate- ly 75 feet between adjacent driveways in order to minimize interference between traffic of adjacent facilities, it is anticipated that there will be no interference with the traffic destined to and from the Town launching ramp facility and the proposed southerly site exit driveway for the Marina Bay Club. In addition, it should be noted that the Town of Southold has a ramp attendant who controls the traffic in the vicinity of the launching ramp and collects any fees associated with the use of the ramp. Thus, no conflicts from a traffic standpoint are anticipated due to the location of the proposed southerly exit driveway from the Marina Bay Club. Furthermore, the public beach parking facility is located to the south of the Town launching ramp. Since this Town beach parking facility is located approximately 200 feet south of the southerly site exit driveway of the Marina Bay Club, no interference between the traffic opera- tions of these two facilities are anticipated based on the same reasoning applied above for the Town launching ramp facility. In reference to the traffic operation of the major access points in the vicinity of the post office, it should be noted that a good access design has been accomplished. A T-intersection has been created that will permit traffic to travel easterly past the post office and make 65. either a) a left turn to enter into the restaur- ant and marina parking area or b) make a right turn to enter into the parking area for the boat storage and the employee parking area on the east side of the boat storage building. For traffic exiting the restaurant that utilizes this main access point, a stop sign will be located at the intersection of the access drive- way at Main Street just east of the post office. In addition, a stop sign will control the drive- way exit from the boat storage facility onto Main Street . Furthermore, both the parking lots on the north and south side of Main Street will be available for use by people traveling to and from the post office facility. At present, traffic headed to the post office travels onto Marina Bay Club property and then must make a U-turn to head back west on Main Street . With the proposed operation of the access driveways, vehicles can either park on Main Street on either the northerly or southerly side of the street or they can park in either the restaurant/marina parking lot on the north side of Main Street or the boat storage parking lot on the south side of Main Street . Currently, there are no parking spaces clearly defined along Main Street for use of the post office facility. As a result , haphazard parking is presently occurring. With the proposed improvement of Main Street by the developer and the creation of the northerly and southerly parking lots for the Marina Bay Club with the well designed major access points, an enhanced parking and traffic flow operation will occur for not only the restaurant, marina and boat storage facilities, but also for the patrons of the post office. In particular, this proposed access plan and the parking lot layout will provide an enhanced circulation for the post office traffic and will provide off-street parking for use by the post office patrons. Comment No. 93- Exiting behind the boat storage area is not desirable because of constant activity and the operation of the travel-lift . Response No.93- The use of the southerly exit in the vicinity of the boat storage area has been reviewed. As a result, it is proposed that the operation of this exit roadway be revised to permit its use only by employees who would be designated to park on the east side of the boat storage area and for use by emergency vehicles only. In this manner the exit use would be restricted from its 66. previously anticipated use. In concert with the revised operation of this southerly exit drive- way, the parking on the east site of the boat storage has been revised to assure that there is no interference with the forklift or travel-lift operation between the boat storage facility and the travel-lift slip. The parking spaces on the east side of the boat storage will be designated for use by employees only and all other vehicles will be restricted from this driveway. Comment No. 94- The size of the project may cause traffic and parking problems. On-site parking is not adequate. Response No. 94- In order to fully address the traffic and parking impact of the proposed project , the developer has undertaken two significant aspects : 1 . A Traffic Impact Study has been prepared which examined in great depth, using accept- able traffic engineering procedures and analyses, the traffic impact on the surround- ing highway network. This study showed that there will be no adverse traffic impacts. The major findings of this study indicated that a) low volumes of additional traffic will be generated by the proposed expansion of the restaurant/marina, b) the detail computerized intersection capacity analyses indicated that there would be no degradation of the existing levels of service of the surrounding intersections as a result of the addition of the site-generated traffic from the proposed Marina Bay Club, and c) the parking provided is in excess of the parking required by the Town of Southold. 2 . The developer, as previously noted in this response document, has agreed to limit the Phase II development originally proposed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement . The reduction of the Phase II development by the elimination of the 2 ,000 square foot restaurant building addition and the subse- quent reduction in seating capacity will further reduce the minimal traffic impact which was previously presented in the Traffic Impact Study in the DEIS. 67. Also with respect to on-site parking, our traffic engineering examination of other similar type restaurants and marina uses indicated that the parking proposed for the site is sufficient to meet the needs of the proposed size of the restaurant . In addition, our examination of other marina facilities, as documented in the Traffic Impact Study, indicated that other similar marinas in the area are not providing as much parking as the proposed Marina Bay Club. Furthermore, our observation of these other marinas indicated that the utilization of the parking did not meet the Town parking require- ment; in other words, the Town parking requirement is high and the lot at the Marina Bay Club is not anticipated to be fully occupied. Comment No. 95- A 400% traffic increase does not appear to be minimal as stated in the DEIS. Response No.95- A review of the additional site-generated traffic should not be undertaken solely on the basis of the percentage increase because this presents a warped and unrealistic statistic. Specifically, the report indicated that the additional number of vehicles to be generated by the site are minimal . For instance, 130 additional vehicles (see Revised Table 3 in this report) will be added to the roadway network during the peak Saturday P.M. hour. Since the volumes are so low, a comparison of just the percentage is extremely misleading. For instance, if one vehicle is on the road, three are added and a total of four vehicles result, an increase of 300% would occur. However, the increase of three vehicles to the roadway is a) minimal , b) will have no adverse traffic impact, and c) will not be noticeable to motorists on the roadway or residents along a residential street . Based upon the distribution of traffic along the roadway network, the addition of 130 vehicles to the existing 136 vehicles during the Saturday P.M. peak hour is minimal . Comment No. 96- Town Highway Superintendent should be contacted for his comments on eliminating drainage problem on existing Town Road. 68. Response No.96- The Town Highway Superintendent was contacted by H2M Group and his comments on eliminating the drainage problem on First Street have been incorporated into the revised plan. Comment No. 97- A more complete study should be performed for Saturday morning traffic and Sunday morning and afternoon traffic. Weekend traffic was not realistically addressed in the Traffic Study. Response No. 97- Detailed traffic data were also collected during the A.M. on Saturday and during the A.M. and P.M. on Sunday. Although this was not in the form of intersection turning count movements at the surrounding intersections, machine traffic counts were collected throughout the day for a seven day period during the August summer season. The traffic machine count data were included in the Traffic Impact Study in the section entitled, "Traffic Volumes" which was contained in the Appendix. The 12 :00 Noon to 1 :00 P.M. hour was the highest hour of Saturday traffic occurring on the adjacent roadways. The peak hour on Sunday also occurred during the 12 :00 Noon to 1 :00 P.M. time period and was almost identical to the Saturday volumes . In addition, to examine the amount of traffic that would be generated by a marina of similar size and type as the proposed marina, traffic machine counts were also collected at two other marinas . The Mattituck Marina and Strong's Marina data indicated the amount of traffic that would be generated by a marina during Saturday and Sunday peak time periods. This information indicated that the highest hour of operation of the marina ( including the post office and peak restaurant generation) that would coincide with the peak highway traffic would be during the Saturday P.M. hours. More detailed data were collected and analyzed for these peak hours as part of the Traffic Impact Study. The following tables are provided to substantiate the volumes generated by the marina and the reason for selecting the Saturday peak hour as the heaviest composite hour to be examined. Comment No. 98- A greater number of on-site parking spaces may be obtained by using 8 . 5 feet x 18 feet stalls with 60-foot aisles. 69. TOTAL VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME TIME NORTH AND SOUTH ON STRONG'S MARINA MATTITUCK NEW SUFFOLK ROAD INLET MARINA 7:00 A.M. 134 2 25 8:00 A.M. 161 14 22 9:00 A.M. 122 15 34 10:00 A.M. 161 20 32 11:00 A.M. 150 32 32 12:00 Noon 173 38 31 1:00 P.M. 156 22 33 2:00 P.M. 160 51 80 3:00 P.M. 149 30 28 4:00 P.M. 129 22 23 5:00 P.M. 126 16 17 6:00 P.M. 73 26 27 COMPARISON OF SATURDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 70. TOTAL VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME TIME NORTH AND SOUTH ON STRONG'S MARINA MATTITUCK NEW SUFFOLK ROAD INLET MARINA 7:00 A.M. 81 0 18 8:00 A.M. 102 0 29 9:00 A.M. 123 12 36 10:00 A.M. 138 9 31 11:00 A.M. 158 34 20 12:00 Noon 175 39 32 1:00 P.M. 164 36 30 2:00 P.M. 170 59 62 3:00 P.M. 120 37 34 4:00 P.M. 104 42 39 5:00 P.M. 113 39 17 6:00 P.M. 89 50 7 COMPARISION OF SUNDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Source: Dunn Engineering, P.C. 71. Response No. 98- This may be a correct statement , but is not in agreement with the Zoning Code and would require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals . It is the developer 's intention to build the site respecting all applicable requirements and to not seek variances or relief from regulations. Comment No. 99 - The parking calculations should include employee parking requirements when the site is operating at capacity (e.g. , mid-summer weekend, transient slips full , meeting rooms and restaurant booked for a conference or mid-day reception) . Response No . 99 - The parking calculations reflect all the above conditions. In addition, the following three points should be considered. First , transient slips being fully occupied do not require any parking spaces . The transient boat would dock at the facility and then utilize the restaurant and then depart . Thus, no parking spaces would be required for a transient slip operation. Second, the developer has agreed to eliminate the conference room on the second floor, thus, there will be no conference room to be booked for the facility. Lastly, it is anticipated that the number of employees will be approxi- mately 35 . In accordance with the Town of Southold parking requirements, there is no separate Town parking requirement to cover employees as part of a restaurant operation. As a result , the employee parking is included in the overall parking for the restaurant site as specified in the Town code. In conclusion, the parking calculations have been determined on the basis of the existing Town parking code and the number of parking spaces provided is in excess of the Town's requirements. Comment No. 100- Handicapped parking should also be shown on the site plan. Response No. 100- In accordance with town requirements, the plan shows four spaces for handicapped parking. (See site plan in rear pocket . ) Comment No. 101- Traffic using the driveways at the north and south end of the site should be shown. 72. Response No. 101- In order to present a worst case examination, the figures in the Traffic Impact Study were shown with all traffic entering and exiting the site through the main access point and the easterly end of Main Street . However, in response to this comment, revised figures are presented in the Supplement to the DEIS (contained in this document) to show the anticipated traffic at each of the three proposed access points. Comment No. 102- Details should be shown on how existing roadways would be stabilized; i .e. , guardrails, preventive undermining, etc. Response No. 102.- Based on the proposed plan, no improvements such as those noted above will be required. As mentioned in the Traffic Impact Study, Main Street will be resurfaced between First Street and the entrance to the Marina Bay Club. In addition, the roadway will be restriped to provide one lane in each direction with parking lanes on both the east and west sides of the street . Comment No. 103- The total estimated traffic volume is a more appropriate measure of activity for evaluation than additional site generated volume. Response No. 103- Contrary to the above comment , the correct methodology is to examine the composite traffic volumes that will occur . First , traffic counts of the surrounding intersections were taken to reflect the traffic that is presently being generated by the existing use on the site along with the traffic that is currently using all other facilities in the area including Captain Marty's facility, Bonnie 's By the Bay, the beach traffic, the boat launching traffic, etc. Then, the additional traffic that will be generated by the site was determined and was added to the existing traffic to present the total composite traffic that will occur on the roadway once the proposed development opens. It should be noted that this approach does include the total traffic generated by the site. 73. Comment No. 104- The proposed configuration of the marina entrance will increase boat traffic in the area between Schoolhouse Creek and Captain Marty's fishing station. The navigational hazards that may result should be addressed in the document . Response No. 104- The centerline of the marina entrance is almost 500 feet offshore. The entrance water depth and opening is such that any boat using the marina has more than adequate maneuvering room. All craft , upon leaving, will make a sharp turn to starboard as that is the direction to the deeper waters beginning at can buoy C "1" and the sailing/fishing grounds of Peconic Bay. There should be little interference with the powered rowboats of Captain Marty's fishing station. Most fishermen leave earlier in the A.M. than pleasure boaters . For a peak boating day (say the Fourth of July) , one could expect that half the marina fleet would leave over a four to six hour period or about 14 boats an hour. This does not produce a very dense traffic pattern. WATER QUALITY Comment No. 105- Excess road runoff would be directed to the Bay and would be the cause of excess nutrients . Response No. 105- The leaching pool system is designed for two inches of rainfall as required for a self- contained, on-site system. As indicated in our response to Comment 112 , the parking area is permeable and, therefore, only a portion of the runoff will reach the leaching pools. Further- more, excess flow will only be generated on those occasions when flow is greater than the design standard. Based on the above considera- tions, the quantity and frequency of excess flow are not significant . Comment No. 106- What impact would the treatment of bulkhead timbers with creosote or preservative salt have on water quality? Response No. 106- Creosote and salt marine preservatives on wood are used to increase pile life from 5-7 years to 20-30 years . To do this, the treatments must be capable of eliminating marine wood borers (a worm-like animal ) and reducing 74. "fouling" deposits of algea and crustaceans (at least in the first ten years of life) . Since by definition these treatments must have some impact on pile-contacting marine life, questions are frequently raised regarding their impacts on adjacent marine life. This question has been carefully investigated since the early 1970 's especially with regard to creosote. One investigation (Webb, 1975) analyzed the toxicity of newly treated creosote wood on various species. It was found that waterfowl , e.g. , mallards, could ingest food with up to 2 , 150,000 ppb marine creosote with no ill effects . Juvenile blue gills (Lepomis macrochirus) , rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri ) and goldfish (Carrassius auratus) were continu- ously exposed to water with 750, 320 and 250 ppb marine creosote respectively with no ill effects . Another study by Ingram, et . al . 1982 , determined the migration rate for creo- sote in saline waters. This study found that new pilings released up to 0. 45 ppb of creosote components into 275 gallons of water in 96 hours (4 days) . After 96 hours, the concentra- tion declined to about 0. 175 ppb in 10 days as marine organisms decomposed the creosote compounds . If this concentration of released compounds is increased to match the surface area of a "typical" piling, 1 , 110 gallons of water is required to dilute creosote releases to 0. 45 ppb. Assuming the proposed action requires 1 , 000 pilings, 1 , 111 ,000 gallons of "dilution" water are required to reach this level . However, tide flows past the site four times per day ( two ebb, two flood) . The 3 . 45-acre site at 6 feet deep has 555 . 5 million gallons move past the site every 5 . 4 hours . If this water body does not exchange with other waters over a four day period ( it is very likely that this water will be exchanged at least once every two days) , the creosote concentration could peak at 0.0009 ppb four days after installation. This maximum creosote concentration is only 0. 00036 percent or 277, 777 times less than the lowest no-effect level . Since the maximum level (with numerous worst-case assumptions) will be very much less than the lowest no-effect level on aquatic biota, creosote treated pilings will certainly have no significant effect on the biota of Cutchogue Harbor . 75. The long term effects of creosote migration was also analyzed (Webb, 1975) at Wickford Harbor in Rhode Island. This harbor is largely bulkheaded for recreational marine use involv- ing boats of all sorts . The study found that no difference occurred in marine biota commun- ities between a marina in the Harbor and an untouched marsh in Narragansett Bay. Addition- ally, no bio-accumulation of creosote compounds was noted in bio assays of marine biota tissues. Salt wood treatments have also been used to preserve marine woods for many years ( i .e. , since the 19401s) . These salts are composed of copper, arsenic and chromatic compounds. While the data are less complete for these compounds versus creosote in the marine environment , they have been observed to leach less into the surrounding environment . Since the dilution factor is so great on-site and these salts are commonly found at 1 ,000+ ppb levels in marine species ' tissues, no significant impact on marine biota is anticipated. Additionally, the American Wood Preservers Institute in cooperation with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency have stated that the use of creosote and CCA for pressure treating timbers for marina construction is environmentally acceptable. (See correspon- dence from A.W.P. I . in Appendix B. ) In summary, neither marine preservative treat- ment appears to pose an environmental threat to the marine environment . The choice of preserva- tive should, therefore, be left with the applicant . As such, the intent of the Marina designers is that all piling will be creosote treated and all other construction timbers will be CCA treated. Comment No. 107- It is more preferable for the marina construc- tion to have the wood timbers pressure treated with preservative salts rather than creosote since creosote has adverse properties which allow it to leach from the wood. Creosote is a known carcinogen which could adversely impact the health of local aquatic resources . Response No . 107- See response to Comment No. 106. 76. Comment No. 108- Rejected water from the RO system would be discharged to the Bay and would have a greater salinity. The impact of the excess salinity and the dispersion of this wastewater on the bay ecosystem needs further study. Response No. 108- The Fish and Wildlife Service of the U.S. Department of Interior was contacted in order to request their technical assistance on deter- mining the impact of the RO system reject water on bay fish and wildlife resources . The follow- ing are exerpts from their January 22 , 1988 response (the full response can be found in Appendix B) : The open waters of Cutchogue Harbor provide excellent and, in our opinion, indispensable habitat for bay scallops . The data contained in the draft environ- mental impact statement describe the use of a reverse osmosis water treatment plant which will discharge an effluent with a slightly more elevated content of dissolved solids than ambient conditions. Actual salinity changes will depend upon tidal water movement , solute dissociation and vertical stratification. The excellent tidal flushing of the area is expected to maintain existing salinities and thereby prevent adverse impact of the effluent on Cutchogue Harbor biota. Overall , the net effect of the proposed marina construction and operation should not produce significant adverse effects to local fish and wildlife resources. In addition, as noted in the response to Comment 66, the net flow of salt to the bay will be balanced by the sewage treatment wastewater. It is felt that the positive influence of increasing fresh water underflow to the bay outweighs any possible negative influence that localized "high concentration" brine water will have on the bay. Comment No. 109- The effects of temperature differences and force of discharge at the RO outfall pipe on the marine ecosystem should be discussed. 77. Response No. 109- There should be no appreciable temperature difference between the bay and the reverse osmosis reject water. The retention time in the reverse osmosis system is not long enough to elevate its temperature. The velocity or force of discharge at the reverse osmosis discharge diffuser will be less than that created by a small boat propeller. It is expected to be high enough to minimize clogging/growth, but will dissipate in a very short distance, probably no more than a foot . Comment No. 110- Would the fresh water supply for area residents be diminished in terms of quantity or quality? Response No. 110- The current groundwater flow regime will be improved by the installation of the reverse osmosis treatment system. This is the result of increasing the net fresh water flow to the bay. This is done by removing salt water from the bay, converting it to fresh water, and recharging it through the leaching system into an area currently affected by the salt water/fresh water interface. On a local level , this additional fresh water will tend to drive the salt water interface seaward, thus having a positive effect on nearby water supply wells . Comment No. 111- Dredging creates silt which would travel to the Bay and might probably affect shellfishing activities . Response No. 111- See response to Comments #27 and #28 . Comment No. 112- Runoff would cause accumulation of hydrocarbons in leaching pools and when added to wastewater, heavy rains may cause a serious water back-up in the area. Response No. 112- Since the parking area is made up of a four- inch gravel course rather than pavement, only a minority percentage of the runoff would actually flow to the leaching pools. Heavy rains may indeed cause the ground to become saturated and temporarily raise the groundwater table. However, this is not an unusual condition for Long Island, where the majority of storm water is disposed of by groundwater recharge. 78. Comment No. 113- The document should also discuss how accidental fuel spills at the fueling dock, the fuel tanks and within the boat storage building will be contained. Response No. 113- The fuel tanks will be installed and operated in accordance with Suffolk County Article XII requirements so as to minimize the potential for fuel spills. 79. BIBLIOGRAPHY American Wood Preservative Institute, 1985. A Review of Fifty Years of Safety and Versatile Usage of Wolmanized CCA Pressure-treated Wood Products. Bohlen, W.F. , D.F. Cundy and J.M. Tramontano. 1979 . Suspended Material Distribution in the Wake of Estuarine Channel Dredging Operations . Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 9 : 699-711 . Ingram, Leonard L. , Jr. , Gary D. McGinnis, Lee R. Gjovik and Gale Roberson. 1982 . "Migration of Creosote and Its Components from Treated Piling Sections in a Marine Environment . " AWPA Proceedings, Vol . 78, pp. 120-128 . Stern, E.M. , and W.B. Stickle. 1977 . Effects of Turbidity and Suspended Material in Aquatic Environments; Literature Review. Dredged Material Research Program Technical Report D-78-21 . U.S . Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss . U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) . 1984 . Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement : Westway Highway Project . New York District , New York, N.Y. U. S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . 1972 . Quality Criteria for Water. Washington, D.C. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 2658-1 . Nov. , 1980. "The Biologic and Economic Assessment of Pentachlorophenol , Inorganic Arsenicals , Creosote, Volume 1 : Wood Preservatives, " pp. 219-224 . Webb, David A. 1980. "Creosote, Its Biodegradation and Environmental Effects . " AWPA Proceedings, Vol . 76, pp. 65-69 . 1975 . "Some Environmental Aspects of Creosote. " AWPA Proceedings, Vol . 71 , pp. 176-181 . 80. APPENDIX A PLANNING BOARD MINUTES PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DEIS NOVEMBER 9 , 1987 FOCI( �� D T D S ,�1 � � Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Planning Board Minutes November 9, 1987 The Southold Town Planning Board held a regular meeting on Monday, November 9 , 1987 at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold at 7: 30 p.m. Present were: Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Member William F. Mullen,Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr. Member Richard G. Ward Member Kenneth Edwards Town Planner Valerie Scopaz Executive Administrator Victor Lessard Administrative Assistant Diane M. Schultze * * * * * * * * * * * 7: 30 p.m. Public hearing for public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the site plan for Marina Bay Club located at New Suffolk, SCTM # 1000-117-8-18. Mr. Orlowski: Good evening, I would like to call this hearing to order. First order of business is a public hearing. We have proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman, we have proof of publication in the Suffolk Times signed by Christina Contento and notorized by Mary Degnan. We have a complete Draft Environmental Impact Statement and we are here tonight to hear comments for this. Please step up and give your name for the Secretary. Jack Fisher: My name is Jack Fisher and I live in New Suffolk. We have a number of things that we were concerned about and we have discussed it with Mr. Carr and his experts and he is attempting to address these concerns as the project develops. We will submit a written memorandum within the 10 commitment period. Once we have an opportunity to study the comments fo the various agencies. Firstly, as I said we are concerned with the size of the project the 450 seat restaurant. The traffic problems and parking problems that may adversaly effect the community. Raising the height of the site by three fee and affecting the surrounding property especially during the flooding period. WE feel that we have enough problems A. 1 Planning Board Page 2 11/9/87 now, but if they raise that another three feet they will create more of a problem. We are a little concerned about exceeding the NY State Grant boundary. The reverse osmosis water system and by products and the other problems that may be entailed with that. The location of the sewage treatment e system as well as the potential noise and light pollution. Tonight, Pat Calahan, who is also on our committee is here and he can comment with respect to more of the technical aspects of these problems. However, before Pat, I think Linda Fletcher who is president of the New Suffolk Civic Association has a few words. Linda Fletcher: Yes, my name is Linda Fletcher and I reside in New Suffolk and I ' am president of the New Suffolk Civic Association. I concur with the remarks made by Jack who is a member of the monitering committee of the New Suffolk Civic Association. I would also like to add the following comments. In my study of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, I learned that the main purpose of any Draft Environmental Impact Statement is to investigate and then mitigate. When I compared these principals to the DEIS presentation of the Marina Bay Club, I find that the mitigation section of the document is inadequate. In my opinion, this inadequacy is caused by failure to thouroughly investigate possible problems in the preceeding sections. Particularly in regard to traffic, parking and scraping of the grade level, and the water supply and sewage treatment. In none of these areas have a worst case scenerio presented, thus reliving the applicant of any reason to mitigate. I would ask you to request a worst case scenerio for the areas and for the mitigating measures. Lastely, in the alternative section of the document there is no presentation of an alternative based upon reduced size and scope. In my opinion these alternative, this alternative should be given much consideration. Members of the New Sufolk Civic Association trust that you will give your best efforts in the review of this proposal. Thank you. Pat Calahan: Im Pat Calahan of New Suffolk. Over the past, actually three years, Mr. Carr has made an effort to keep the community very posted on his activities and plans. We had an opportunity to sit down with him some time ago, gave him some preliminary comments and then more recently over the past month we have sat with him and attended our most recent Civic Association and most comments I would say are on the way to resolution. And, as Jack Fisher pointed out there are still some open issues. I would however like to bring out the items we have discussed to give you a sense of where we are with him. And, maybe add a little more perspective and dimension to our involvements on the report. One of our initial concerns in reading the DEIS was the magnitude of the materials to be removed. I think it talked about 27, 000 cubic yards for the dredging and we weren' t sure if that was dredging or mining. We explored that further with Mr. Carr' s engineers who explained to us in terms of the grading A.2 Planning Board Page 3 11/9/87 plan. The grading and the quantity was reduced to about 18, 000 yards after their refinement. But it still left us concern with respect raising the site. The site, which is currently at elevation 5 and 6 would be going up to elevation 8 and 9 and higher depending upon other needs. So, that continues an area of concern with us. It is a fairly large area of 3j acres to be raised that amount, visually, we thought it would have impact, also from the point of view of flooding. A few other details, not details, comments. We talked with Mr. Carr concerning the boat storage building and the fact of would it be used for on-call use of boats. Which would, of course, impact on the traffic generation. I believe the folks who did the traffic study had indicated no generation due to the boat storage facility. Mr. Carr reaffirmed that with us that it is not going to be an on call facility and with respect to that building comment that came up as a result our Civic Association meetins was that if some effort could be made to move the building further inside the property too, we would appreciate that you take a look at it. I realize it probably fits the footprint of the earlier two buildings that were there, but if possible it would be a very positive thing to do. With respect to water supply and proposed waste system, we have brought to Mr. Carr' s attention the fact that we thought that the RO system that he is proposing is probably going to be a large cost to him and probably a lot of headaches as he goes along with that type of system. And, suggested that he contact or perhaps review further some of the suggestions made by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services on the earlier condo proposals because we believe they either directly or alluded to going off site. Now, that may sound like an unusual comment to receive from a Civic Group usually, in essence, we normally have that other position. However, we see in that case, there will be a balance interms of meeting his needs and perhaps meeting the needs of the community since virtually all the property on First Street and maybe a portion of Second Street are in the flood zone and many, many people have brackish water so we will ask Mr. Carr if he will look at going off site in conjuncition with the County Health Services to see if in fact that will be feasible and if in fact there could be potable water supply made available to others in the community who might need it. Regarding the wastewater systems and again that relates to the surface elevations which was proposed, the property was proposed to be raised to we understand that a package treatment plant is recommended by the Health Department, Department of Health Services and of course, attended to that the problem is in order to get sufficient areas for the leaching fields. We have a concern there, I think it may be a mixed blessing, but we are concerned with dealing with a high water table, tidal influence, I am personally familiar with the fact of the existence of a meadow matter of bog a few feet from the surface. The fact that it had been prior landfilled. Another words, we are concerned with the adequacy of even developing a system for sufficient perculation. Perhaps, some alternative approaches could be looked at. Dependent with that waste system would be a building to house A.3 Planing Board Page 4 11/9/87 the treatment plant. We were concerned with its proximity to First Street and appreciate his immediately recognizing that as a problem. He indicated to us that he would be looking at that to see if it could be moved further on the site, perhaps integrated with his building for boat storage. In other words, get away from the street recognizing that notwithstandin the purported high technilogy that will be employed in the system that there can be problems. He also assured that he would be putting emergency generators should there be power failures, obviously the problems that that would cause. We talked, Jack mentioned in passing, regarding noise and lights. We think the development is kind a challenge to his architects and designers to recognize our sensativity and our needs. I personally live rather close and many other of us do. New Suffolk is virtually at night, there is no light and no noise. So the thresholds are very low. So we again appreciate his giving alot of consideration to that in design, keeping the lights very subdued and to the maximum extent possible insulating the mechanical systems. Just two other points with respect to the overall site and its extent. The outer easterly boundary of the site would be roughly, like twice, as far to the east as what it is today, so you measure from the high water mark. We are uncertain as to what his rights are to these lands and as this whole process would progress which we could prove to him as a result of that, we would look forward to having similar restrictive covenants as what was placed in the original grant in order to insure that the next generation should they be faced with the same generation that they would have assurance that the property remain in the constant use. Lastly, I would just like to comment on we have cooperation we had recommendation that perhaps some folks from the community could work with him and his architects and other people from the historic point of view. We kind of felt that there was not enough attention as could be given to that . But, he was most agreeable to do that. I think that would be all the comments I have and I do hope that other folks and Mr. Carr would continue to offer their comments this evening. Thank you. John Hart: Mr. Chairman, I am John Hart of Pelletreau and Pelletreau of Patchogue. We are the attorneys for Mr. Carr. What I would like to indicate to is what has already been indicated by Mr. Fisher, Ms. Fletcher and Mr. Calahan and that is that there has been a real spirit of cooperation here between Mr. Carr and the members of the community And, we are amenable to and continue to be amenable to the requests and issues of the community and will continue to work with them. There has been a spirit of cooperation and we hope that this spirit will continue. A.4 Planning Board Page 5 11/9/87 Tom Lowry: My name is Tom Lowry, I live in New Suffolk. I am going to key my comments to the DEIS pages for your convenience. Chapter One, page one, Mr. Carr, in his DEIS claims to own six acres more or less. That seems to indicate that there is no question in his mind concerning the validity of the Town or the State Grants. The late Town Attorney was uncertain as to the validity of the Town Grant and I have a letter from the NY State Department of State saying that the validity of that grant as far as he is concerned also is in question. I would say, also that on page A15 of the DEIS and this is a quote " there is apparent appropriation of public bottom for private use" . I guess that is Mr. Emlita' s comment, it is not attributed, but I believe that to be the case. Chapter One, page two, the number of slips proposed in phase two is given as 137. That seems to me to be very high and I would be more than happy if Mr. Carr would just be pleased with the number of slips that he is asking for in phase one which is, I think, 84. Chapter One, page six, one of the three access points to the project is directly North of the Town property at that point, by that I mean the launching ramp. It seems to me that an exit from the project at that point, coming out almost next to the launching ramp, which is right next to the entrance and exit to the public parking- lot for the beach means that there will be a hell of alot of traffic at the corner of Jackson and First and I would like to see some attention paid to redesigning that part of it. Chapter One, page seven, says that the choice of type of sewage is left open. I can understand thereason for that I don' t think that anything ought to be considered as approved in any final way until a final choice of the type of plant is made. Chapter One, page eight, there is a mention of a minimal increase in traffic, that is a quote. Whereas on pages nine and ten of that Chapter One the figures are sited that amount to saying that really the increase in traffic is something on the order of 400%. That doesn' t seem to me to be minimal. Page A4, there is no mention of the DEIS of the Trustees ' question of commercial fisherman using the facility. I would like to raise the question of the possiblity if perhaps the bayman might get a preferential rate on the use of the facility. Page A15, I am sorry, I am wrong on that. Page Al2, the developer mentioned the removal of 150 truckloads of topsoil from the site. I would like to think that he would consider, if possible, that with a little informal survey be made of New Suffolk' s own needs perhaps some of those 150 truckloads might be well used in the hamlet itself. Thank you. I Ronnie Wacker: My name is Ronnie Wacker and I represent the North Fork Environmental Council. I want to thank you for the opportunity to present our views on the Draft Environmental IMpact Statement of the proposed Marina Bay Club in New Suffolk. 1 There can certainly be no argument that the present marina facility in New Suffolk can be improved. We have a few concerns, however, that the scale proposed may overwhelm this tiny I A.5 Planning Board Page 6 11/9/87 fishing village. When the applicant states that the building height will be 28 ' will this be 28 ' above sea level or 28 ' added to the 10 ' elevation at first floor level proposed in compliance with flood plain regulations. If the latter, than residents who chose their homes for the superb view of the Bay there will face instead a 38 ' obstruction over 500 ' long. And, I wonder whether any thought has been given to what this three and a half story wall will look like from the water. We would like to see more analysis of the traffic impact on Saturday mornings between 8 and 10 when boatmen are heading to their boats and other people are heading out to yardsales or on errands. The same problem, if there is one, can be expected to arrise on Sunday, when people are going to church. Also, in the evening on Sunday, you have boatmen returning from the sail, people going out to dinner or coming home from the beach or starting a long drive back to the city. Weekend traffic problems, we feel, are not realistically addressed. The weekend traffic survey was limited to one Saturday this summer between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. We feel this deserves more extensive study. How effective will the 39 leaching pools be in the recharge of stormwater into the ground. Have soil perculation tests be made to establish this. The applicant states that when storms produce more than 2"- of water per hour the excess runoff will be directed into the Bay. Now, road runoff has been determined to be the single most important contributor to pollution of our creeks and bays. This will bring additional nutrients into a Bay which is already suffering the effects of excessive nutrients which has experienced an algea bloom which has killed off the scallop crop for the last three years . Also, the reverse osmosis will pipe rejected water to an outfall nozzle 500 ' inthe bay, the DEIS says the increased salinity will have no impact on the Bay. The shell fish and fin fish are very sensative to even a slight change in water conditions. This deserves further study, in our opinion. In considering reverse osmosis, we would also like to be assured that the operators will be highly trained in this innovative system. Has it been used before in Peconic Bay waters. And, what has its performance been. In the matter of water pollution, what will be the effect of treatment of bulkhead timber with 20 pounds of creaso of 2. 5 pounds of preservative salt per cubic foot. Our last concern might be seen as biting the hand of a benefactor. The applicant suggests that the marina complex, after construction has been completed, will bring an average of 45 permanant jobs in phase one and as many as 65 - 70 jobs in phase two. This may normally be considered a boom to the area, but have you tried to hire people for non-skilled jobs recently. Other than boat mechanic, chef, engineers, the bulk of these jobs waiters, cleaners, maintenance workers will be filled by people without specific training. There isn' t a supermarket, restaurant, or vineyard that isn' t experiencing a problem with personal now. To some it would seem that the area would welcome an expanded marina project, but worries about being crushed to death in the embrace commercial octopus . Certainly, the project needs a more A.6 Planning Board Page 7 11/9/87 researched Environmental Impact Statement. Joan Robbins: My name is Joan Robbins, my husband, and I live in New Suffolk, our home is on the northeast corner of Third and Main Street. We would like to add our voices to the concerns that have already expressed. One of our major concerns- is of course the fresh water supply. That Our supply not be diminished either in quantity or quality either by the water supply system of Marina Bay Club or by the waste disposal system, whatever choice is made in that area. Another one of our major concerns is the quality of the bay water, whatever quality is left. That that not be diminished by this project and thirdly, the traffic. Even now, with the marina operating in a very limited way, the Galley Ho in its present capacity King Street is not Main Street. There are individual drivers now who leave the vicinity of the Galley Ho and seem to be inclined to reach 90 miles an hour by the time they get to the Fifth Street light. Which is five very short blocks. With an expansion of this size, I think at the very least, the Town will be hearing from a lot more of us a lot more frequently. The size is unimaginable, but we hope some accomodation can be made in that regard. " We hope to be able to get out of our driveway which entrances and exits on Main Street. And, we hope that New Suffolk remains-New Suffolk. Steve Latson: My name is Steve Latson and I am secretary of the bayman' s association. One of the things we are opposed to in this project is that it seems that it is going to confiscate three acres of State bay bottom. If you figure out the numbers it comes out to a little over three acres. This area also is always a prime scallop area. Beyond that the dredging of 27, 000 cubic yards is stated to be not significant but we do consider this significant. If you went into one of our local creeks and started dredging a channel you could dredge a channel 500 by 50 by 3 feet deep, that is quite a channel. The other question is suitability of the heavy metals for fill that this spoil is supposed to go for. When you read the heavy metal numbers you really have to question, they are pretty high, we think and we asked a consultant and he thought they were quite questionable. So, if you use it as fill, you are going to be jeopardizing the water table and also you are going to be saturating that ground with these metals, copper, arsenic, mercury, tin and they go on and on. The other thing is when you are dredging, you will be creating silt in the water and of course this will go out into the other parts of the Bay and this is not a good feature also. Another question is the 39 leaching pools. Gradually, if you have 85% coverage of the area and you have these enormous parking area, it seems that you will have an inordinate amount of hydrocarbon pollutant accumulating in the leaching pool area. In conjunction with the 17, 000 gallons of treated wastewater, it seems like this area is going to be taking a really heavy dose of water, especially if you have some heavy rains. And, if the calculated perculation of half a foot to two feet, if it is only half a foot, I can really see some serious backing up of water in this area. A.7 Planning Board Page 8 11/9/ 87 If we have a wet season. As far as underground fuel storage goes, Port of -_Egypt and the Greenport Shipyard have just recently installed above ground diked fuel tanks. I have a feeling you are probably not allowed in next to a marine area to put underground tanks because if you do have a breach in the tanks, you will never known it until it is too late. The idea obviously is to contain it above ground and clean it up before it gets into the marine habitat. As far as the reverse osmosis goes, roughly if you use the system to its full capacity you will be pumping 1. 4 times the normal base salinity back into the Bay, you will be pumping about 100 , 000 gallons a day and it comes out to somewhere about 37 million gallons a year. This is a real question mark, how fast does it disperse etc. and so forth. I don' t think the report has adequately covered how fast it disperses. But, increased salinity basically increases, will bring an increase in preditors. If you go through the Peconic System, you get to Gardiner' s Bay, the preditors jump up enormously because the salinity jumps enormously. Quite possiblity due to the lack of flushing in the Peconics you may end up haveing excess salt in the Cutchogue Harbor area which is part of the critical habitat area hopefully. The last thing that I want to say, is as far as their citing 44 NY State Coastal Zone Management Policies, they did cite 7 of them, I-can cite 7 of them which would probably go against what they are saying. The real intent of these 44 policies and I ' ll read it briefly: It is the intention of the legislature that the preservation, enhancement and utilization of natural and manmade resources of the State ' s unique coastal area take place in a coordinated and comprehensive manner to insure the proper balance of natural resources to accomodate the needs of population growth and economic development. Accordingly it is the intention of this part of achieve a balance between economic development and preservation that will permit the beneficial use of coastal resources while preventing the loss of living marine resources to the water and wildlife, dimunition of open spaces or public access to waterfront, shoreline erosion, impairment of scenic beauty or permanent adverse changes to ecological systems. I think finally, what we feel is that the size and scope of this marina is way beyond something that won' t permanently adverse, make adverse changes to the ecological system. Thank you. Bill Yetter: My name is Bill Yetter. I am a member of the New Suffolk Civic Association and I have my business in North Fork Shipyard which will be the Marina Bay Club. I am a yacht broker, I have been a yacht broker for 15 years, member of the association of marina industries and am familiar with and have visited everyother marina on Peconic Bay, many of them in Conecticut, Rhode Island, and up as far as Newport. I have boated and traveled as a boatman. Thinking about the size of this project, I am thinking recently that, I can' t recall the name, but Mr. Tooker has a marina up in Riverhead, which exits right into the Town of Riverhead, A.8 Planning Board Page 9 11/9/87 with well over 100 slips. Larry' s Lighthouse Marina a little further East, has 170 slips in Aquebogue and 120 in South Jamesport with a total of 270. Coming along further I think that Brewer' s who used to be Pierce has grown by quite some numbers coming out further and further into Sterling Harbor. Corrigan' s in Hampton Bays has 120 some odd slips, they have .just enlarged on the canal. Star Marina has 127 on Lake Montauk coming out in to the lake. And, as far as I am concerned the size of this marina coming out into the Bay, not on creeks or canals or inland waters poses no hazards to navigation. And as far as the shell life, I really can' t say, but it seems to be no more crucial there than in the creeks and inland waters of this part of the Bay and area. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, are there any other comments. Mr. John Hart: Mr. Orlowski, and members of the Board. I think that basically there is no dispute between Mr. Carr and the members of the community. There is an economic engine that drives us and there is a certain size that will make it work. And, there is an identity of interest between the community and Mr. Carr. Mr. Carr wants to make it work, the community wants to make it work. We are interested in preserving the water supply and we are willing to talk to the community about that and about moving the source of water supply to the point that will use a reverse osmosis system to a point at some other location. We have a real identity of interest. There is an economic benefit that will accrue to the community. There is an economic benefit that will work for both parties. There will be an increase in jobs, and I think that working together we can have something that New Suffolk and the Town of Southold will be proud of and so far we have had a dialoge, I think, that has been effective. We hope to continue this dialogue and working together I think we can make it work. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments. Patsy Rogers: My name is Patsey Rogers, I live in New Suffolk and teach in the school there. I would, I 've heard alot of talk in New Suffolk in the last few days about we must never be confrontational and how we must all cooperate and so on. And, I would only like to say that not all of use agree that this is a good project for New Sufolk. Not just because of the size, but at all. And, there are some people who strongly disagree. I feel that the committee has worked very hard to be fair and no confrontational and so on and that is marvelous but I don' t think it is right to represent that all people in New Suffolk approve of this project and think it is a good idea, I am one who does not. Mr. Orlowski: Thank you any other comments? Hearing none. Any questions from the Board? Mr. Mullen? Mr. Mullen: I just have a comment. I would like to see the applicant and the Civic Association and the Environmental A.9 Planning Board Page 10 11/9/87 Council and any one else get together and sit down and clarify some of these problems such as the parking, the lights, the water , the traffic and so on. It appears to me that you people want to work together and if you site down and come up with some of these answers it is going to make it much clearer and beneficial to everybody concerned in the future. And, that frankly, is what I am most concerned with, the future. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, Mr. Latham. Mr. Latham: I would echo Bill ' s statement that we can all work together on this. Mr. Orlwoski: Okay, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: I have a question. There was a comment made early on about a restaurant for 450 . Is that a number that we heard. Because I don' t see that anywhere on the plan and I would like a clarificiation on that. Mr. Hart: That is the second phase, Mr. Ward. And, I think that Mr. Carr has already agreed to diminish in size. Mr. Ward: What would that be diminished to? Mr. Hart: It would be reduced by 150. Mr. Ward: For a total of 300. Mr. Hart: Yes, but I mean that is using outsidein the summer time to increase it to that amount. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: No, just that I think the points brought up will be well taken by this Board. Mr. Orlowski: I think there were some very good comments made here tonight. You have until November 19 to get any comments to the Board to be reviewed. Dave Emilita has been reviewing this DEIS and his comments will be forthcoming. And, I can tell you that we will take everything into consideration. Thank you for coming down and good night. I will declare this hearing closed. * * * * * * * * * * * * A.10 APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED ON THE DEIS BY THE SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD i � J lost • 1■/1 • 1■/1 I 1/mango. ,GuN /L t/%off Is%%uss► ,� ■a miss 111 is a��. '4//1111\ 11 ■■// 1ow��► • I • x•11 ■■///■ ill ■�////. ■/1 ■■■■■■ Post Office 1. ■/11m^_�/■moo ■L_- � INJ/�• SITE �1 awl NEI Data JUNE 1987 REV. JAN.N 1988 MARINA BAY CLUB /. I EIS Scale In Feet *3&11 i1 00 . n-T , • of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR r FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE i" P.O. Box 534 705 White Horse Pike Absecon, New Jersey 08201 (609) 646-9310 January 22, 1988 Ms. Janet F. Haeberle, Legal Assistant Pelletreau and Pelletreau 20 Church Street - Box 110 Patchogue, New York 11772 Dear Ms. Haeberle: This responds to your January 5 , 1988 letter to Thomas Sperry of my Long Island staff regarding the potential impacts to the bay scallop (Argopecten irradians irradians) and the waters of Cutchogue Harbor from the proposed construction of the Marina Bay Club at New Suffolk, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The following is for technical assistance only and does not represent the comments of the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with Section 2(b) of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667e). Optimal bay scallop habitats are generally characterized by moderate salinities, vegetated subtidal bottoms, low wave energies and minimal water turbulence. Tidal creeks and protected embayments associated with Shelter Island and Long Island's north and south forks have produced the majority of Long Island's commercial bay scallop harvest. The open waters of Cutchogue Harbor provide excellent and, in our opinion, indispensable habitat for bay scallops. 1 The data contained in the draft environmental impact statement describe the use of a reverse osmosis water treatment plant which will discharge an effluent with a slightly more elevated content of dissolved solids than ! ambient conditions. Actual salinity changes will depend upon tidal water movement, solute dissociation and vertical stratification. The excellent itidal flushing of the area is expected to maintain existing salinities and thereby prevent adverse impacts of the effluent on Cutchogue Harbor biota. An expanded marina facility will increase incidental gasoline, oil and other fuel and lubricant discharges into local waters. However, such water quality degradation may be mitigated by the improvement of on-shore sewage collection B.2 and treatment. Most oily discharges are expected to occur within the marina facility where they can be easily contained and removed. Overall, the net effect of the proposed marina construction and operation should not produce significant adverse effects to local fish and wildlife resources. Please continue to coordinate with Mr. Sperry should further questions arise. Sincerely, Clif d G. Day Supervisor i l z B.3 861:1030 STATE WATER LAWS SUBSTANC STANDARDS ( CAS No . ) WATER CLASSES micrograms/liter _.;LPXES Zinc [NA] AA;AA—s , —s (Human) 300 10 NYCRR Part 170 AA;AA—s ;A; A—s c) 30 I B ; C 30 I D It H SA; S H 170 H Remarks : * — exp (0 . 83 [ ln(ppm hardness) ] + 1 . all standards except (Human) apply to acid—soluble form PART 703 (i) Ground waters are those waters in the saturated GROUND WATER CLASSIFICATIONS, QUALITY zone, including perched water areas. STANDARDS, AND EFFLUENT STANDARDS (I) Industrial waste means any liquid,gaseous, solid or AND/OR LIMITATIONS waste substance or a combination thereof resulting from any process of industry, manufacturing, trade, or (April 2, 1972; Amended August 2, 1978. Effective business or from the development or recovery of any September 1, 1978; November 5, 1984) natural resources, which may cause or might reasonably 703.1 Definitions: The terms, words or phrases used in be expected to cause pollution of the waters of the State Part 703 shall have the following meaning: in contravention of the standards adopted as provided in (a)Administrator shall mean the Administrator of the ECL, Article 17. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (k) Land application techniques include the following (b)Best usage of waters as specified for each class shall three basic methods of waste discharge application: be those uses as determined by the Commissioner in ac- irrigation, infiltration-percolation: overland flow. cordance with the considerations prescribed by the En- (1) Land utilisation practices entails the use of plants, vironmental Conservation Law, the soil surface, and soil matrix for removal of certain (c)Commissioner shall mean the Commissioner of En- wastewater constituents. vironmental Conservation. (m) Micrograms per liter, ug/l, is the weight in (d) Consolidated rock or bed rock is the compact or micrograms of any specific substance or substances con- solid hard rock exposed at the surface of the earth or tained in one liter of solution. overlain by the unconsolidated deposits. (n) Milligrams per liter, mg/l, is the weight in (e) Department shall mean the New York State milligrams of any specific substance or substances con- Department of Environmental Conservation. tained in one liter of solution. (f) Disposal System means a system for disposing of (o) Other wastes means garbage, refuse, decayed sewage, industrial waste or other wastes, and including wood,sawdust,shavings,bark,sand.lime,cinders,ashes, sewer systems and treatment works. offal, oil, tar. dyestuffs. acids, chemicals, leachate, (g)Effluent standard and/or limitation shall mean any sludge,salt, and all other discarded matter not sewage or restriction on quantities, quality, rates and concen- industrial waste which may cause or might reasonably be trations of chemical, physical, biological, and other con- expected to cause pollution of the waters of the State in stituents of effluents which are discharged or allowed to contravention of the standards adopted as provided in run from an outlet, point source or any other discharge ECL, Article 17. within the meaning of ECL 17-0501 into the unsaturated (p)Outlet means the terminus of a sewer system,or the or saturated zones. point of emergence of any water-borne sewage,industrial (h)Fresh Water is that water having a chloride concen- waste or other wastes or the eliluent tberefrom, into the tration equal to or less than 250 mg/I,or a total dissolved saturated or unsaturated zones. solids concentration equal to or less than 1000 mg/I. (q) Pathogenic organists shall mean any disease- Environment Reporter 716 B.4 S-10 NEW YORK WATER STANDARDS 861 1031 producing organism. malities, cancer, genetic mutations, physiological (r) Perched ground water shall mean unconfined malfunctions, including malfunctions in reproduction,or ground water separated from an underlying body of physical deformations, in such organisms or their offspr- ground water by an unsaturated zone. ing. (s)Person or persons shall mean any individual,public (dd) Treatment works means any plant,disposal field, or private corporation, political subdivision, government lagoon, pumping station, constructed drainage ditch or agency, municipality, industry, co-partnership, associa- surface water intercepting ditch, incinerator, area tion, firm, trust, estate or any other legal entity what- devoted to sanitary land fills, or other works not soever. specifically mentioned herein,installed for the purpose of (t) Point source means any discernible. confined and treating, neutralizing,stabilizing or disposing of sewage, discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any industrial waste or other wastes. pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete (cc) Unconsolidated deposits are full non-or poorly in- fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal durated soil materials above the bed rock. feeding operation or vessel or other floating stock from (ff)71nc unsaturated zone is that portion of the earth's which pollutants are or may be discharged. crust which does not contain sufficient water to fill all in- (u) Pollutant means dredged spoil, solid waste, in- terconnected voids or pore spaces. Perched water bodies cinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, may exist within the unsaturated zone. munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, (gg) Waste management system includes the manage- radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equip- ment of mechanical equipment, crops, irrigation and ment, rock, sand and industrial, municipal, and monitors as an operational unit. agricultural waste discharged into water. 7031 Purpose (v) Pollution shall mean the presence in the environ- ose of classifications,quality standards,and meat of conditions and or contaminants in quantities of effluent standards and/or limitations. The purpose of characteristics which are or may be injurious to human, these classes, quality standards, and effluent standards plant or animal life or to property or which unreasonably and/or limitations is to prevent pollution of ground interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life and waters and to protect the ground waters for use as a potable water. property throughout such areas of the state as shall be affected thereby. (w) Potable waters are those fresh waters usable for 703.3 Collection of samples. (a) The determination of compliance or non-compliance of sewage, industrial drinking, culinary or food processing purposes. waste or other waste discharges with the requirements of (x)Quality standard shall mean such measure of purity this Part shall be made through tests or analytical deter- or quality for any ground waters in relation to their best minations of ground water or effluent samples collected usage. in such manner as arc approved by the Department. (y)Saline water is that water having a chloride concen- (b) The location at which ground water samples are tration of more than 250 mg/I or a total dissolved solids collected shall be determined by the Department. In concentration of more than 1000 mg/l. selecting or approving such locations, the Department (z) The saturated zone is that extensive portion of the shall consider all relevant facts, including but not limited earth's crust which is saturated with water. (includes to: perched water areas.) (1) The mobility of pollutants in the unsaturated zone (aa)Sewage means the water-carried human or animal is governed by the rate of movement of percolating water wastes from residences, buildings, industrial es- and the active pollutant attenuation mechanisms in this tablishments or other places, together with such ground zone. water infiltration and surface water as may be present. (2) Attenuation mechanisms may remove potential (bb) Subsurface sewage disposal system shall mean a pollutants in passage through topsoil and adequate disposal system which discharges sewage beneath the sur- thicknesses of the unsaturated zone. face of the ground. (3)Attention of pollutant concentrations with distance (cc) Toxic pollutant means those pollutants, qr eom- may occur in the saturated zone,similar to that in the un- bination of pollutants, including disease-causing agents, saturated zone, as a result of attenuation processes oc- which after discharge and upon exposure, ingestion, in- curring below the water table. halation or assimilation into any organism,either direct- (c)The location at which effluent samples are collected ly from the environment or indirectly through food shall be at a point where the effluent emerges from a chains, will, on the basis of information available to the treatment works.disposal system.outlet or point source department, cause death, disease. behavioral abnor- and prior to being discharged to the ground. 11-29-85 Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS,INC.,Washington.D.C.20037 717 B.5 861:1032 STATE WATER LAWS 703.4 Tests or analytical determinations. Tests or (2) Quality standards for class GA waters shall be the analytical determinations to determine compliance or most stringent of- non-compliance with standards shall be made in acoor- (i) the items and specifications applicable to such dance with: waters found in this section; (a) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water (ii) the maximum contaminant levels for drinking and Wastewater (see section 705.1 of this Title); water promulgated by the Commissioner of Health as (b) Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and found in 10 NYC RR Subpart 5-I,Public Water Supplies Wastes (see section 705.1 of this Title); or any subsequent revision thereto or replacement (c) Water standards of the American Society for thereof; testing and Materials(see section 705.1 of this Title);or (iii) the maximum contaminant levels for drinking (d) by other methods approved by the Commissioner water promulgated by the Administrator under the Safe as giving results equal to or superior to methods listed Drinking Water Act(see section 705.1 of this Title) and above. 40 CFR Part 141. effective July 1, 1978 (see section 703.5 Classes and quality standards for ground waters, 705.1); (a)Class GA (1)The best usage of Class GA waters is as (iv) the standards for raw water quality promulgated a source of potable water supply. Class GA waters are by the Commissioner of Health as found in 10 NYCRR fresh ground waters found in the saturated zone of un- Part 170, Sources of Water Supply or any subsequent consolidated deposits and consolidated rock or bed rock. revision thereto or replacement thereof. (3) The following quality standards shall be applicable to Class GA Water: ltr nr.� Specifications I. None which may impair the quality of the ground (a) Sewage, industrial waste or other wastes, taste or waters to render them unsafe or unsuitable for a potable odor producine substances, toxic pollutants,thermal dis- water supply or which may cause or contribute to a con- charges, radioactive substances or other deleterious dition in contravention of standards for other classified matter. waters of the State. (b) The concentration of the following substances or 2. Shall not be greater than the limit specified,except chemicals: where exceeded due to natural conditions: (1) Arsenic (As) (1) 0.025 mg/1 (2) Barium (Ba) (2) 1.0 mg/l (3) Cadmium (Cd) (3) 0.01 mg/l (4) Chloride (Cl) (4) 250 mg/l (5) Chromium (Cr) Hexavalent (5) 0.05 mg/1 (6) Copper (Cu) (6) 1.0 mg/I (7) Cyanide (CN) (7) 0.2 mg/1 (8) Fluoride (F) (8) 1.5 mg/l (9) Foaming Agents' (9) 0.5 mg/I (10) Iron (Fey (10) 0.3 mg/l (11) Lead (Pb) (Il) 0.025 mg/l (12) Manganese (Mny (12) 0.3 mg/l (13) Mercury (Hg) (13) 0.002 mg/l (14) Nitrate (as N) (14) 10.0 mg/1 (15) Phenols (15) 0.001 mg/1 (16) Selenium (Se) (16) 0.02 mg/I (17) Silver (Ag) (17) 0.05 mg/I (18) Sulfate (SO') (18) 250 mg/l (19) Zinc (Zn) (19) 5 mg/I (20) pH Range (20) 6.5-8.5 (21) Aldrin, or 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-1,4,4a, (21) not detectable' 5.8,8a-hexahydro-endo-1 4-eto-5, 84methanonaphtba- lene- Emrironmem Reporter 718 B.6 NEW YORK WATER STANDARDS s-10 861 1033 /tents Specifications (22) Chlordane, or 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octaebbro-2,3, (22) 0.1 ug/I 3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoindene. (23) DDT, or 2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)-I.i,l-trichlor- (23) not detectable oethane and metabolites. (24) Dieldrin, or 6,7-epoxy aldrin. (24) not detectable (25) Endrin, or 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6.7-epoxy- (25) not detectable 1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-endo-l,4-endo-5,8-dimetha- nonaphthalene. (26) Heptachlor, or 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4, (26) not detectable' 7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanoindene and metabolites. (27) Lindane and other Hexachlorocyclohexanes or (27) not detectable' mixed isomers of 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexane. (28) Methoxychlor, or 2,2-bis-(p-methoxyphenyl)- (28) 35.0 ug/I I,1,1-trichloroethane. (29) Toxaphene(a mixture of at least 175 chlorinated (29) not detectable camphene derivatives). (30) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (30) 4.4 ug/1 (31) 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid (2,4,5-TP) (31) 0.26 ug/I (Silvex) (32) Vinyl chloride (chloroethene) (32) 5.0 ug/1 (33) Benzene (33) not detectable ' ( ) Benzo(a) pyrcne (34) not detectable ' (35) Kepone or dccachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-medmo- (35) not detectable ' 2H - cyclobuta (cd) pentalen - 2 - one (chlordeone). (36) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) (Arodor) (36) 0.1 µg/l (37) Ethylene thiourea (ETU) (37) not detectable ' (38) Chloroform (38) 100 µg/1 (39) Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane) (39) 5 µg/I (40) Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) (40) not detectable ' (41) Trichloroethylene (41) 10 jag/I (42) Diphenylhydrazine (42) not detectable ' (43) bis (2 - chloroethyl) ether (43) 1.0 µg/l (44) 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenoxyaeetic acid (2,4,5-T) (44) 35 µg/I (45)2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin(TCDD) (45) 3.5 x 10-sµg/l (46)2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid(MCPA) (46) 0,44 µg/l (47) Amiben, or 3 - amino-2,5 -dichlorobenzoic acid 47 87.5 µg/I (chlorambcn) ( ) (48) Dicamba, or 2 - methoxy - 3, 6-dicblorobenzoic (48) 0.44 µg/I acid (49)Alachlor,or 2-chloro-2', 6'-diethyl-N-(meth (49) 35.0 µg/l oxymethyl) - acetanilide (Lasso) (50) Butachlor, or 2 - chloro - 2', 6' - diethyl - N - (50) 3.5 µg/I (butoxymethyl) - acetanilide (M,achete) (51) Propachlor, or 2 - chlor - N - isopropyl - N - (51) 35.0 jcg/l acetanilide (Ramrod) (52) Propanil, or 3', 4' - dichloropropiommilide (52) 7.0 µg/1 (53) Aldicarb, [2 - methyl - 2 - (acthylthio) (53) 0.35 µg/l propionaldehyde O - (methyl carbamoyl oxiimel and methomyl [I - niethylthioaeetaldhyde O-(methyl-car- bamoyl) oximel - (54) Bromaeil or 5 - bromo - 3 - see - butyl - 6 - (54) 4.4 µg/l methluracil 11-29-85 Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS,INC.,Washington,D.C.20037 719 B.7 861 1034 STATE WATER LAWS Items Specifications (55) Paraquat, or 1,1' dimethyl - 4,4' - dipyridylium (55) 2.98 µg/l (56)Trifluralin,or a.a,a trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N- (56) 35.0 µ8/I dipropyl -p - toluidine (Treflan) (57) Nitralin, or 4-(methylsulfonyl)—2. 6-dinitro- (57) 35.0 µg/l N, N - dipropylaniline (Planavin) (58) Benefin, or N - butyl — N - ethyl.- a, a. a - (58) 35.0 µg/I trifluoro - 2,6 - dinitro -p - toluidene (Balan) (59)Azinphosmethyl, or O, O-dimethyl-S-4-oxo- (59) 4.4 µg/l 1,23 - benzotriazin - 3(4H) - ylmethylphosphoro - dithioate (Guthion) (60) Diazinon, or O. "ethyl O-(2-isopropyl4- (60) 0.7 µg/l methyl - 6 - pyrimidinyl) - phosphorothioate. (61)Phorate(also for Disulfoton),or O. O-diethyl-S (61) not detectable 3 - ((ethylthio)methylj -phosphoro-dithioate(Thimet R), and disulfoton, or O, "ethyl-S-((2-ethylthio)ethylj phosphorodithioate (Di-System R) (62)Carbaryl, or I - naphthyl - N - methylcarbamate (62) 28.7 µg/l (63) Ziram, or zinc salts of dimethyl -dithiocarbamic (63)4.18 µg/1 acid. (64) Ferbam, or iron salts of dimethyl-dithiocarbamic (64) 4.18 µg/I acid. (65)Captan, or N- trichloromethylthio-4-cyclohex- (65) 17.5 µg/l enc - 1, 2 - dicarboxmidc. (66) Folpet, or N - trichloromethylthiophthalimide. (66) 56.0 µg/l (67) Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) (67)0.35 µg/I (68) Paradichlorobenzene (PDB) (also (68) 4.7 µg/1 orthodichlorobenzene) (69) Parathion (and Methyl parathion), or (O, - O - (69) 1.5 µ9/1 diethyl O p - nitrophenylphosphorothioate, and methyl t parathion. or O,O-dimethyl-O-p-nitrophenylphosp. horothioate. (70) Malathion, or S- 1,2-bis(ethoxyearbonyl)ethyl (70) 7.0 µg/I O. O - dimethylphosphorodithioate. (71) Maneb, or - manganese salt of ethylene - bis - (71) 1.75 µg/I dithiocarbamic acid. (72) Zineb, or zinc salt of ethylene - bis - dithiocar- (72) 1.75 µg/I bamic acid. (73) Dithane, or zincate of manganese ethylene-his- (73) 1.75 µg/l dithiocarbamate. (74) Thiram. or tetramethylthiummdisulfide (74) 1.75 µg/1 (75) Atrazine. or 2 - chloro - 4 - ethylamino - 6 - (75) 7.5 µg/l isopropylamino - S - triazine. (76) Propazine, or 2 - chloro - 4. 6 - diisopropyl - (76) 16.0 µg/l amino - S - triazine. (77)Simazine, or 2 -chloro-4. 6-diethylamino-S- (77) 7525 µg/I triazine. (78) di - n - butylphthalate (78) 770 µg/I (79) Di (2 - ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (79)42 mg/) (80)Hexachlorophene,or 2.2'-methylene-bis(3,4,6- (80) 7 µg/l trichlorophenol) (81) Methyl methacrylate (81)0.7 mg/1 (82) Pentachlorophenol (PCP) (82) 21 µg/I (83) Styrene (83)931 µg/1 Environment Reporter app B.8 S-10 NEW YORK WATER STANDARDS 861 1035 Notes: 2. Combined concentration of iron and manganese I. Foaming agents determined as methylene blue ac- shall not exceed 0.5 mg/1. tive substances(MBAS)or other tests as specified by the 3. "Not detectable"means by tests or analytical deter- Commissioner. minations referenced in Section 703.4. (b) Class GSA. (1) The best usage of Class GSA waters is as a source of potable mineral waters, for conversion to fresh potable waters, or as raw material for the manufacture of sodium chloride or its derivatives or similar products. Such waters are saline waters found in the saturated zone. (2) The following quality standards shall be applicable to Class GSA waters. Items Specificatiow Items: I. Sewage, industrial wastes or other wastes. Specifications: 1. None which may impair the waters color, taste or odor producing substances, toxic fol use as sources of saline waters for the best usage out- pollutants, thermal discharges, radioactive substances or lined above or as to cause or contribute to a condition in other deleterious matter. contravention of standards for other classified waters of the State. (1) Class GSB. (1) The best usage of Class GSB waters is as a receiving water for disposal of wastes. Such waters arc those saline waters found in the saturated zone which have a chloride concentration in excess of 1000 miligrams per liter or a total dissolved solids concentration in excess of 2000 milligrams per liter. (2) The following quality standards shall be applicable to Class GSB waters. Items Specifications Items: 1. Sewage, industrial wastes or other wastes, Specifuations:I. None which may be deleterious, harm- color, taste or odor producing substances, toxic ful,detrimental or injurious to the public health,safety or pollutants, thermal discharges, radioactive substances or welfare or which may cause or contribute to a condition other deleterious matter. in contravention of standards for other classified waters of the State. (3) Class GSB shall not be assigned to any ground (c) The effluent standards and/or limitations shall be waters of the State unless the Commissioner finds that incorporated in SPDES permits (under Part 750 et adjacent and tributary ground waters and the best usage seq.) for discharges to ground waters, where applicable. thereof will not be impaired by such classification. 703.6 Effluent standards and/or limitadons for dis- Schedwe charges to Class CA waters. (a) The effluent standards Applicability. The fbllowing effluent standards and/or and/or limitations in Schedules 1 and II of this section limitations shall apply to all Class GA waters in New apply to a discharge from a point source or outlet or any York State. other discharge within the meaning of ECL 17-0501 Biological organisms. Coliform and/or pathogenic which discharge will or may enter the unsaturated or organisms shall not be discharged in amounts sufficient saturated zones. to render fresh ground waters detrimental to public (b) The Department may establish additional effluent health, safety or welfare. standards and/or limitations as set forth in Section 703.7. Chemical Characteristics Maximum Allowable Concentration Substance in mg/l(unless otherwise noted) (1) Aluminum (1) 2.0 (2) Arsenic (2) 0.05 (3) Barium (3) 2.0 (4) Cadmium (4) 0.02 (5) Chloride (5) SIM 11-29-85 Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS.INC Washington,O.0 20037 721 B.9 861 1036 STATE WATER LAWS Cht-mital C haructeristics Maximum Allohable Concentration Substance in mg/l (unless otherwise noted) (6) Chromium (Cr) (Hexavalent) (6) 0.10 (7) Copper (7) 1.0 (8) Cyanide (8) 0.40 (9) Fluoride (9) 3.0 (10) Foaming Agents ' (10) 1.0 (11) Iron (11) 0.6 (12) Lead (12) 0.05 (13) Manganese ' (13) 0.6 (14) Mercury (14) 0.004 (15) Nickel (15) 2.0 (16) Nitrate (as N) (16) 20 (17) Oil and Grease (17) 15 (18) Phenols (18) 0.002 (19) Selenium (19) 0.04 (20) Silver (20) 0.1 (21) Sulfate (21) 500 (22) Sulfide (22) 1.0 (23) Zinc (23) 5.0 (24) pH Range' (24) 6.5-8.5 (25) Aldrin, or 1,2,3,4,10,10 - hexachloro - (25) not detectable' 1,4,4a,5,8,8a - hexahydro - endo - 1,4 - exo - 5,8 - 5,8 - dimethanonaphthalene (26) Chlordane, or 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8 - octachloro - (26) 0.1 ug/I 2,3,3a,4,7,7a - hexahydro - 4,7 - methanoindene (27) DDT, or 2,2 - bis - (p - chlorophenyl) - 1,I,1 - (27) not detectable' trichloroethane and metabolites (28) Dieldrin, or 6,7 - epoxy aldrin (28) not detectable' (29) Endrin, or 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6,7-expoxy- (29) not detectable' 1,4,4x, 5,6,7,8,8a - octahydro - endo- 1,4 - endo- 5,8 - dimethanonaphthalene (30) Heptachlor, or 1,4,5,6,7,8,8 - heptachloro - (30) not detectable' 3a.4,7,7a - tetrahydro - 4,7 - methanoindene. and metabolites (31) Lindane and other Hexachlorocyclohexanes or (3 1) not detectable' mixed isomers of 1,2,3,3,5,6 - hexachloro - cyclohexane (32) Methoxychlor, or 2,2 - bis - (p-methoxphenyl) - (32) 35 ug/1 I,1,1-trichloroethane (33) Toxaphene(a mixture of at least 175 chlorinated (33) not detectable' camphene derivatives) (34) 2,4 - Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4 - D) (34) 4.4 ug/I (35) 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid (2,4,5 - (35) 0.26 ug/I TP) (Silvex) (36) Vinyl chloride (chloroethene) (36) 5.0 ug/I (37) Benzene (37) not detectable 4 (38) Benzo(a) pyrene (38) not detectable' (39) Kepone or decachlorooctahydro - 1,3,4 - metheno - (39) not detectable' 2H - cyclobuta (cd) pentalen - 2 - one (chlordeone) (40) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) (Aroclor) (40) 0.1 ug/I (41) Ethylene thiourea (ETU) (41) not detectable' (42) Chloroform (42) 100 ug/I (43) Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane) (43) 5 ug/I (44) Pen tach loronitrobenzene (PCNB) (44) not detectable• (45) Trichloroethylene (45) 10 ug/1 Environment Reporter 722 B.10 NEW YORK WATER STANDARDS S-t0 861.1037 Chemical Characteristics Maximum Allowable Concentration Substance in m;/l (unless otherwise noted) (46) Dlphenylhydrazine (46) sot detectable 4 (47) bis (2 - chloroethyl) ether (47) 1.0 ug/1 (48) 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5 - T) (48) 35 ng/1 (49)2,3,7,8-'Tetrachlorodibenzo - p - dioxin (TCDD) (49) 3-5 x 10-s ug/1 (50)2- Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid(MCPA) (50)0.44 ug/1 (5 1) Amiben, or 3 -amino-2,5 -dichlorobenzoic acid (51) 87.5 ug/I (chloramben) (52) Dicamba, or 2 - methoxy - 3,6 - dichlorobenzoic (52)0.44 ug/I acid (53) Alachlor, or 2 - chloro -2', 6' - diethyl - N - (53) 35.0 ug/I (methoxymethyl) - acetanilide (Lasso) (54) Butachlor, or 2-chlor- 2', 6'diethyl-N-(butox- (54) 3.5 ug/1 ymethyl) - acetanilide (Machete) (55) Propachlor, or 2 - chlor - N - isopropyl - N - (55) 35.0 ug/I acetanilide (Ramrod) (56) Propanil, or 3', 4'- dichloropropionanilide (56) 7.0 ug/I (57) Aldicarb, 12 - methyl - 2 - (methylthio) (57)0.35 u#/I propionaldehyde O - (methyl carbamoyl) oxime] and methomyl (I - methylthioacetaldehyde O - (methyl - car- bamoyl) oxime] (58) Bromacil, or 5 - broma - 3 - sec - butyl - 6 - (58) 4.4 ug/I methluracil (59) Paraquat, or 1,1' - dimethyl - 4,4' - dipyridylium (59) 2.98 ug/I (60)Trifluralin, or a,a,a,-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N- (60) 35.0 ug/I dipropyl - p - toluidine (Treflan) (61) Nitralin, or 4 - (methylsulfonyl) - 2,6 - dinitro - (61) 35.0 ug/I N,N - dipropylaniline (Planavin) (62) Benefin,or N—butyl-N-ethyl a,a,a, -trifluoro- (62) 35.0 ug/1 2,6 - dinitro -p - toluidine (Balan) (63)Azinphosmethyl,or 0,0 -dimethyl-S-4-oxo- (63)4.4 ug/1 1,2,3, - benzotriazin - 3 (4H) - ylmethylphosphorodithioate (Guthion) (64) Diazinon, or 0.0-diethyl O -(2-isopropyl-4- (64)0.7 ug/I methyl - 66 - pyrimidinyl) - phosphorothioate (65)Phorate(also for Disulfoton),or 0,0-diethyl-S (65) not detectable• - [(ethylthio)methyl] - phosphorodithioate (Thimet R), and disulfoton,or 0.0-diethyl-S-[(2-ethylthio-ethyl] phosphorodithioate (Di-System R) (66) Carbaryl, or I -naphthyl - N - methylcarbamate (66) 28.7 ug/I (67) Ziram, or zinc salts of dimethyldithiocarbamic (67) 4.18 ug/I acid (68)Ferbam, or iron salts of dimethyl-dithiocarbamic (68) 4.18 ug/1 acid (69)Captan, or N-trichloromethylthio-4-cyclohex- (69) 17,5 ug/1 ene - 1,2, - dicarboximide (70) Folpet, or N-trichloromethylthiophthalimide (70) 56.0 ug/1 (71) Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) (71) 0.35 ug/1 (72) Paradichlorobenzene(PDB)(also orthodichloro- (72)4.7 ug/1 benzene) (73) Parathion (and Methyl parathion), or (O, - O - (73) 1.5 ug/1 diethyl-O-p-nitrophenylphosphorothioate,and methyl Parathion, or O, O - dimethyl - O - p - 1 nit rophenylphosphorothioate 11-29-85 Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIR&INC.,Wasrnnoon,D.C.20037 723 B.11 861:1038 STATE WATER LAWS Chemical Characteristics .'Maximum Allowable Concentration Substance in mg/1 (unless otherwise noted) (74) Malathion, or S - 1,2 - bix (ethoxycarbonyl) (74) 7.0 ug/1 ethyl - 0,0 - dimethylphosphorodithioate (75) Maneb, or - manganese salt of ethylene - bis - (75) 1.75 ug/I dithiocarbamic acid (76) Zineb, or zinc salt of ethylene - bis - dithiocar- (76) 1.75 ug/I bamic acid (77) Dithane, or zincate of manganese ethylene- bis - (77) 1.75 ug/l dithiocarbamate (78) Thiram, or tetramethylthiuramdisulfide (78) 1.75 ug/1 (79) Atrazine, or 2 - chlor - 4 - ethylamino - 6 - (79) 7.5 ug/1 isopropylamino - S - triazine (80) Propazine, or 2-chloro-4,6-diisopropylamino- (80) 16.0 ug/I S - triazine (81) Simazine, or 2 - chloro - 4,6 - diethylamino- S - (81) 75.25 ug/l t ri azi ne (82) di - n - butylphthalate (82) 770 ug/1 (83) Di (2 - ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (83) 4.2 mg/I (84) Hexachlorophene,or 2,2'-methylene-bis(3,4,6- (84) 7 ug/1 trichlorophenol) (85) Methyl methacrylate (85) 0 7 m I (86) Pentachlorophenol (PCP) (86) 21 ug/1 (87) Styrene (87) 931 ug/1 A*otes limitations for a toxic pollutant or any substance not in- I. Foaming agents determined as methylene blue ac- cluded in Schedule 1 or 11, when necessary, to prevent tive substances (MBAS) or other tests as spcwified by the pollution and protect the ground waters for their best Commissioner. usage. The Department shall consider rules and 2. Combined concentration iron and manganese shall regulations promulgated by the Administrator or the not exceed 1.0 mg/1. New York State Department of Health in establishing 3. When natural ground waters have a pH outside the such standards and/or limitations. Additionally, the range indicated above, that natural pH may be one ex- Department shall consider Action Levels for compounds treme of the allowable range. determined to exhibit toxic effects which are established 4. Not detectable means by tests or analytical deter- by the New York State Commissioner of Health. minations referenced in Section 703.4. (b) Circumstances under which the Department may Scbedule 11 consider more stringent effluent standards and/or Applicability. In addition to the effluent standards limitations include, but are not limited to: and/or limitations in Schedule 1,the following also apply (1) a discharge to an aquifer which is the sole or prin- in the counties of Nassau and Suffolk. cipal source of a potable water supply. Chemical Characteristics (2) an existing or proposed discharge is directly on or into consolidated rock or bed rock; Maximum Allowable (3) a discharge containing one or more substances Substance Concentration in mg/1 which in combination with precipitation and/or natural Dissolved Solids. Total 1090 soil constituents is likely to produce a toxic pollutant; or Nitrogen. Total (as N) 10 (4) where adverse accumulative or synergistic effects 703.7 Additional effluent standards and/or limitations can be established for constitutents in a discharge. (a) The Department, after consultation with the State (c) Where a discharge is proposed or exists which Department of Health, may establish on a case by case would or does contain a pollutant for which there is a basis more stringent effluent standards and/or quality standard under this part but there is no applicable limitations than those set forth in Schedule 1 or 11 of Sec- effluent standard and/or limitation under this part for tion 703.6 and may impose effluent standards and/or such a pollutant.the Department.after consultation with i Environment Reporter 724 B.12 NEW YORK WATER STANDARDS S-t0 861 039 10 the New York State Department of Health, shall es- established by the Department on a case by case basis tablish effluent standards and/or limitations for such and as may be required by 6 NYCRR Part 756. pollutant on a case by case basis. 703.10 Exceptions. (a) Activities and Conditions. The 703.8 Modifications of effluent standards and/or effluent standards and/or limitations for discharges to limitations. (a) (1) A person responsible for a discharge Class GA waters set forth in Section 703 6 are not subject to this Part may petition in writing for a applicable to the following activities: modification of the effluent standards and/or limitations (I) The discharge of sewage without the admixture of found in Section 703.6 or established pursuant to Section industrial waste or other wastes when. 703.7. (i) a disposal system, point source or outlet consists of (2)Such person shall have the burden of establishing to a subsurface sewage disposal system designed, con- the satisfaction of the Commissioner, after his consulta- structed and maintained in accordance with guidelines tion with the New York State Commissioner of Health, and standards satisfactory to the Department: that one or more of the effluent standards and/or (ii)monitoring facilities are utilized in accordance with limitations are unnecessarily restrictive as to a particular requirements as may be specified by the Department: and discharge in that such modification of certain standards (iii) the disposal system is designed to discharge. and and/or limitations would, notwithstanding non- discharges, less than 30,000 gallons per day compliance with such standards and/or limitations, pre- (2) Normally accepted agricultural practice of utilizing vent pollution and protect the ground waters for their chemicals and fertilizers for growing of crops for human best usage. and animal consumption. and (b) The regulations contained in 6 NYCRR Part 753 (3) The potential renovative capabilities of a Kaste prescribing procedures for notice and public participa- management system employing land application techni- tion shall apply whenever a person petitions for a quos and land utilization practices may be permitted for a modification of effluent standards and/or linations es- discharge provided it has been demonstrated to the tablished pursuant to Section 703.6. satisfaction of the Commissioner, after his consultation 703.9 Studies and monitoring.(a)The Department may with the New York State Commissioner of Health :hat. require the submission of information by any person (i) there shall be no actual or potential public iiealth responsible for a discharge in order that the Department hazard; may evaluate the short and/or long term effect the dis- (ii) applicable water quality standards shall be met in charge may have on ground waters of the State or for the the saturated zone, and purpose of determining additional effluent standards (iii) applicable water quality standards shall not be and/or limitations or modifications thereto, as set forth contravened in any adjacent waters of the State. in Sections 703.7 and 703.8, respectively. Such informa- (b) Nothing contained in Section 703.10 shall be con- tion may include, but is not limited to: strued to allow any discharge which would preclude the (1)a statement of the property to be affected by a dis- best usage of Class GA waters specified in Section 703.5. charge and the extent to which such property is under the 703.11 Assignment of ground water classifications and control of the person responsible for such discharge; quality standards The ground water classifications and (2) a geohydrologic analysis of the aquifer(s) which quality standards enumerated in Section 703.5(a)and(b) may be affected. of Part 703 are assigned to all the ground waters of the (3) a determination of the direction and rate of move- State of New York. ment of the discharge and the natural ground water, (4) an evaluation of adverse effects a discharge may PART 704 have on any aquifer, source of potable water supply, and CRITERIA GOVERNING THERMAL DISCHARGES or other surface and ground waters of the State; (April 28, 1972; September 20, 1974) (5) an evaluation of the ability of unconsolidated deposits. consolidated rock or bed rock and the ground Section 704,1 Water quality standard for thermal dis- waters to attenuate potential pollutants such that the best charges (a) All thermal discharges to the waters of the usage of the ground waters is maintained. State shall assure the protection and propagrtion )f a (b) The Department may require the installation and balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish and operation of monitoring facilities in order to assure com- wildlife in and on the body of water. pliance with effluent standards and/or limitations or to (b)The criteria contained in this Part shall apply to all evaluate the effect of the discharge on the quality of the thermal discharges and shall be complied with,except as ground water. Specific monitoring requirements shall be provided in this Part. 11-29-85 Published by THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS.INC..Washinoon,D.C.20037 725 B.13 Forest Conservation Through Wood Preservation v v John F. Holl Resident December 29, 1987 Mr. Clemence Cameron Dravo Van Houten Consulting Engineers 11 Penn Plaza New York, New York 10001 Dear Mr. Cameron: Thank you for calling the American Wood Preservers Institute for information about the environmental acceptance of creosote and CCA treated wood piling. Enclosed are copies of the Consumer Information Sheets for wood products that have been pressure treated with creosote or with CCA and other inorganic arsenical preservatives. These sheets, developed in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, cover the EPA and industry recommended precautions for the use, handling and disposal of pressure treated wood products. The only potential limitation on the use of pressure treated wood for a marina would be the recommendation that treated wood not be used where it may come into direct or indirect contact with public drinking water. However, there is a specific exemption from even this limitation "for uses involving inciden- tal contact such as docks and bridges. " Also enclosed is an order form for the EPA-approved training program for the nc-"n—restricted use of creosote for pole framing, piling applications and railroad tie repair. This training program is required for any one who uses creosote for field applications to piling. Copies are available from AWPI for $20 a set. Mr. Cameron, thanks again for calling. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, /o/hn . Hall Enclosures American Wood Preservers Institute B.14 Tyson's International Building 1945 Old Gallows Road,Vienna,VA 22180(703)893-»005 Forest Conservation(tough Wood Preservation QM October 1986 EPA-Approved Training Program for the Non-Restricted Use of Creosote for Pole Framing, Piling Applications and Railroad Tie Repair Any person who uses creosote in pole framing, piling applications or railroad tie repair after November 10, 1986, must have completed an EPA-approved training Program. The American Wood Preservers Institute has prepared and is distributing that EPA-approved training program. The training program consists of a 13-minute video and a training manual. Copies are available in VHS or BETA format for $20. The video uses cartoon characters to emphasize basic information about the use of creosote as found in the Federal Register of January 10, 1986. Reference is also made to the Material Safety Data Sheet for creosote, a typical creosote label, and the Consumer Information Sheet for wood products pressure-treated with creosote. This material is not copyright protected and may be duplicated locally as long as both the video and the training manual are duplicated in their entirety. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- American Wood Preservers Institute 1945 Old Gallows Road Vienna, Virginia 22180 Please send me the following copies of the EPA-approved training program for the non-restricted use of creosote for Pole Framing, Piling Applications and Railroad Tie Repair: copies in the VHS format @ $20 a copies in the BETA format @ $20 = TOTAL $ Name Company Address City State zip Telephone ( ) American Wood Preservers Institute Tyson's International Building B.15 1945 Old Gallows Road,Vienna,VA 22180(703)893-4005 Consumer h yOt'11 al iot l SL eet INORGANIC ARSENICAL PRESSUREnTREATED WOOD (including: CCA, ACA, and ACZA) CONSUMER INFORMATION Treated wood should not he used where it may conic I into direct or indirect contact with public drinking w:ucr. This wood has been preserved by pressure-treatment except for uses involving incidental contact such as with an EPA-registered pesticide containing inorganic docks and bridges. arsenic to protect it from insect attack and decay. Wood Itreated with inorganic arsenic should be used only where such protection is important. Inorganic arsenic penetrates deeply into and remains in the pressure-treated wood for a long time Exposure to n��+�r inorganic arsenic may present certain hazards. Thcre- J��]ll �PI�GlAU AURONS fore, the following precautions should be taken both lug D when handling the treated wood and in determining Iwhere to use or dispose of the treated wood. Dispose of treated wood by ordinary trash collection or burial. Treated wood should not bo. .nirncd in open I fires or in stoves,fireplaces.or residential boilers because toxic chemicals may he produced as part of the smoke and ashes. "heated wood from commercial or industrial use (raga. construction sites) may he burned onl in USE SITE PRECAUTIONS I commercial or industrial incinerators or boilers in accor- dance with state and Federal regulations Avoid frequent or prolonged inhalation of sawdust I Wood pressure-treated with waterborne arsenical pre- from treated wood.When sawing and machining treated scryatives may he used inside residences as long as all woof,wear a dust mask.Whenever possible.these opera- sawdust and construction debris arc cleaned up and tions should he performed outdoors to avoid indoor disposed of after construction. accumulations of airborne sawdust from treated w•ootl IDo not use treated wood under circumstances where When power-sawing and machining. wear goggles to the preservative may become a component of food or protect eyes from flying particles. animal feed. Examples of such sites would he structures After working with the wood.and before eating.drink- or containers for storing silage or food. ing, and use of tobacco products. wash exposed areas Do not use treated wood for cuts ing-hoards or counter- thoroughly. tops If preservatives or sawdust accumulate on clothes Only treated wood that is yisihty clean and free of launder before reuse.Wash work clothes scparatcl from surface residue should he used for patios, decks and other household clothing. walkways. Do not use treated wood for construction of those portions of beehives which may conic into contact with the home• lyproved/)v the V.) it:err.1roMM111t( 1 PI-01CC11011B.16 Consumer Information Sheet CREOSOTE PRESSURE- WOOD CONSUMER INFORMATION Only treated wood that is visibly clean and free of surface residues should be used for patio%, decks and walkways. This wood has been preserved by pressure treatment Do not use treated wood for construction of those with an EPA-registered pesticide containing creosote to portions of beehives which may come into contact with protect it from insect attack and decay. Woxxl treated the honey. Iwith creosote should be used only where such protec- Creosote-treated woad should not be used where it tion is important. may come into direct or indirect contact with public Creosote penetrates deeply into and remains in the drinking water,except for uses involving incidental con- I pressure-treated wood for a long time. Exposure to cre- tact such as docks and bridges. osote may present certain hazards.Therefore,the follow- Do not use creosote-treated wood where it may come ing precautions should be taken both when handling the into direct or indirect contact with drinking water for treated wood and in determining where to use the domestic animals or livestock,except for uses involving Itreated wood. incidental contact such as docks and bridges. USE SITE PRECAMONS HANDING PRECAMONS Wood treated with creosote should not be used where Dispose of treated wood by ordinary trash collection it will be in frequent or prolonged contact with bare skin or burial. Treated wood should not be burned in open I (for example,chairs and other outdoor furniture)unless fires or in stoves, fireplaces, or residential boilers, be- an effective sealer has been applied. cause toxic chemicals may be produced as part of the Creosote-treated wood should not be used in residen- smoke and ashes. Treated wood from commercial or tial interiors.Creosote-treated wood in interiors of indus- industrial use (e.g., construction sites) may be burned trial buildings should be used only for industrial building only in commercial or industrial incinerators or boilers components which are in ground contact and are subject in accordance with state and Federal regulations. to decay or insect infestation and wood block flooring. Avoid frequent or prolonged inhalation of say.-dust I For such uses,two coats of an appropriate sealer must he from treated wood.When sawing and machining treated applied. Sealers may be applied at the installation site woof,wear a dust mask.Whenever possible,these opera- Wood treated with creosote should not be used in the tions should be performed outdoors to avoid indoor I interiors of farm buildings where there may be direct accumulations of airborne sawdust from treated wood. contact with domestic animals or livestock which may Avoid frequent or prolonged skin contact with cre- crib(bite)or lick the wood. osote-treated wood; when handling the treated wood, In interiors of farm buildings where domestic animals wear long-sleeved shirts and long pants and use gloves I or livestock are unlikely to crib(bite)or lick the wood, impervious to the chemicals(for example,gloves that arc creosote-treated wood may be used for building compo- vinyl-coated). nents which are in ground contact and are subject to When power-sawing and machining, wear goggles to decay or insect infestation if two coats of an effective protect eyes from flying particles. Isealer are applied.Sealers may be applied at the inst21la- After working with the wood,and before eating,drink- tion site. ing, and use of tobacco products, wash exposed areas Do not use creosote-treated wood for farrowing or thoroughly. brooding facilities. If oily preservatives or sawdust accumulate on clothes, Do not use treated wood under circumstances where launder before reuse.Wash work clothes separately from the preservative may become a component of ftxxl or other household clothing. animal feed.Examples of such use would be structures or Coal tar pitch and coal tar pitch emulsion are effective I containers for storing silage or food. sealers for creosote-treated wood-block flooring. Do not use treated wood for cutting-boards or counter- Urethane,epoxy,and shellac are acceptable sealers for all tops. creosote-treated wood. I Approl rd bi,the U.S. Environmental Protection A-enc), 9/85 B.17 E i IH ► LABS, INC. Environmental Testing Laboratories LABORATORY 575 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, New York 11747-5076•(516)694-3040 REPORT Water/Waste Water Laboratory.Hazardous Waste Laboratory•Air Testing Laboratory Pilot Plant Studies and Other Analytical Services LAB NO. 766256 - - - _- >`RO.SSC T N 0. 2C CLI ENT1 NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE_ OF SAMPLE - MISCEL.L.ANEOUS COLLECTED BY Cl. 99 DATE COf_I_FCTEA - 12/20/87 DATE RECEIVED - 12/21 /87 B. LANG ASSOCIATES 15 FRANKLIN CT SPECIAL SAMPLES NORTHPORT NY 11768 NITRATE AMMONIA ORTHO TOTAL LAB NO. SAMPLE ID INFORMATION (NO3-N) (NH3-N) PHOS-P PHOS-P 766256 FLUT. #1 <0. 10 0.35 0.47 0.50 766257 EUJf. #2 <0. 10 4.35 0.07 0.07 7662518 SURFACE WATER {0. 10 0.34 <0.0g <O.6!5 to .,.fir' a.♦. , 5; REMARKS - ATTNSMIKE BONTJE ALL. RESULTS IN (MG/L.) EXCEPT AS NOTFA BY # (UG/L.) OR % (PFRCENT) A N 0 T.COL.1 BACT. 2: FECAL. COLI (MPN/144ML) _ DATE _RE-P_O_RTED t/ 6/88 _ COLORS, DDDR, TURBIDITY I PH (UNITS) APC & FECAL STREP (COUNTS/Ml- ) SPEC.C(]ND. (IIMHOS) SETT.SLII_J1)S(M!_/f_ ) _ _ LABORATORY DIRECTOR THE LIABILITY OF H2M LABS,INC.SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE PRICE OF THE SERVICE RENDERED AND PAID RLECE"r CD BY F oil( P D S�JiiiULli NQ, a -� -- 7987 . T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman FROM: Valerie Scopaz , Town Planner RE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Marina Bay Club, New Suffolk DATE: November 18, 1987 The following observations are based on two field inspections , a reading of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, a reading of all the correspondence that has been received as of this date and a review of the minutes of the November 9th hearing on this proposal. Statements were made at this hearing to the effect that the developer has agreed to make certain changes in the proposal, as a result of community pressure. However, my comments must address the DEIS as it was written and submitted for review. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be revised so as to address the following items . The items are addressed as they appear or should appear, in the Executive Summary. 1 . Although the actual building heights will not exceed 28 feet; they will appear to be higher than the surrounding buildings because they will be placed on about A to 5 feet of fill. The document does not state how the parking area will be graded and landscaped to ameliorate the 3 to 5 or 6 foot difference in site 1 elevation between the subject property and the neighboring properties including First Street. A site grading and road profile should be included with the document. The profile analysis should show the north, south, east and west elevations. 2. The document is neither consistent nor clear in its description of the proposed seating capacity of the restaurant. Page 2. 7 indicates that there will be a private dining room for twenty people. There is no mention of this room on page 1 . 1 . Also, neither page indicates the seating capacity of the proposed outdoor seating area. B.19 1 3 . The parking calculations should include employee parking requirements when the site is operating at capacity (e.g. mid-summer weekend, transient slips full, meeting rooms and restaurant booked for a conference or mid-day reception) . Handicapped parking should also be shown on the site plan. 4 . An analysis of the soils tests that were taken of the marina bottom (Appendix B) should be done and placed in the body of the document. Reference should be made to the significance of the findings, particularly with regard to heavy metals and pesticide residues . If significant quantities of toxic substances exist, the document should address the following concerns : a. How will the dispersion of toxic materials in the water be mitigated during the dredging opera- tion? b. Should the "contaminated" portion of the dredge spoil be used for fill or should it be disposed of in a more environmentally acceptable manner? 5 . The past use of this site as a marina and submarine base may be the causative factor in the presence of heavy metals on the marina bottom. The proposed expansion of the marina further out into the bay raises the question of whether the degradation process will be repeated. Mitigative measures to help prevent such degradation should be discussed. . 6 . Removal of 3300 cubic yards of topsoil and loam will re- quire a mining permit from the Town Board. What provisions will be made to provide adequate topsoil for landscaping? 7. The document and the site plan should state what propor- tion of the 500 feet of bulkheading will be new and which portion will be replacement. The site plan should also show the existing shoreline as well as the proposed bulk- heading line. The present and proposed elevations of the beach area at the southerly part of the project should also be shown. 8 . The location of the sewage pumpout station is shown next to the fueling dock. The document does not address how this system will work. Will it be connected directly with the sewage treatment plant? Could another pumpout station be placed near the permanent slips to encourage its use by those boat owners who tend to be stationery or use the boat as a weekend home? 9 . The document should address the hazards associated with placing two 10 , 000 gallon fuel storage tanks underground, particularly ground that is likely to be saturated with water. The alternative of placing the tanks above-ground and away from the boat slips should be discussed. B.20 10. The document should also discuss how accidental fuel spills at the fueling dock, the fuel tanks and within the boat storage building will be contained. 11 . The support utility building does not observe the 500' buffer required by New York State, as mentioned on page 4. 38. The type of construction should be noted. (Type 5 construction may not exceed one story in height. ) 12. The document should discuss the pros and cons of the two types of sewage treatment plants that could be in- stalled. Percolation tests and soil borings should be - taken on the site to determine whether the ground will be able to handle the projected load of approximately 17 , 000 gallons per day throughout the year, in addition to any 6" rainfall runoff that may drain into the projected 39 leaching pools. Provide drainage calculations. 13 . The boat storage building may not house the shower, laundry, and Reverse Osmosis water treatment plant under Type 5 construction requirements . If another type of construc- tion is being proposed, the document should state this. 14. The site plan shows parking spaces in the path the travel- lift must traverse from the slip to the boat storage build- ing. This is not acceptable site design. 15. The leaching pool system is designed to handle 2" ''rainfall. It should be designed to handle a 6" rainfall. Under no circumstances should stormwater overflow be allowed to drain into the Bay except through a filtration system de- signed to prevent the introduction of particulate matter into Bay waters. 16 . The document should incorporate into the discussion on the reverse osmosis water treatment system the following information: a. Salinity, pH, and general composition of the water pumped from the well. b. Salinity, pH, and general composition of the reject water at the point _of discharge into the Bay. The temperature of this reject water should also be stated. C. Probable impacts of the introduction of reject water on the marine ecosystem surrounding the outfall pipe should be discussed. The discussion should include the effects of temperature differences and force of dis- charge at outfall pipe, as well as salinity differences. d. Explanation of why well site was chosen. B.21 17. The proposed configuration of the marina entrance will increase boat traffic in the area between Schoolhouse Creek and Captain Marty' s fishing station. The naviga- tional hazards that may result should be addressed in the document. 18. The document states that the southerly beach line needs to be stabilized, but provides no evidence in support of this. Will bulkheading this beach have any negative impacts on the stability of the remainder of the shoreline to the south and west? 19. The discussion of the sewage treatment facility should include the following information: a. Definition of Class GA groundwaters as per New York State. b. Definition of difference between Total Dissolved Solids and suspended solids effluent concentration. 20 . The question of ownership of the underwater land should be discussed in depth. The site plan does not include a complete metes and bounds (survey) description of the property and the underwater land. The terms of the New York State grant should be presented in the body of the document. It should be noted that the Suffolk County Tax Maps show the underwater lands adjacent to this project as being in the ownership of Southold Town. The scale of this project must be given careful considera- tion. There are two factors that must be addressed: the size of the proposed restaurant/conference facility and the size of the marina. Both have their separate impacts on the�.land and the water. The restaurant' s size is the determinant of the volume of salt water that will need to be treated, the volume of sewage that will need to be treated and disposed of, and the number of parking spaces that will be required. The storage facility and the perman- ent slips in the marina are lesser determinants of those items. The marina and its operation will determine the degree of environmental impacts on the bay bottom and ecosystem. It is suggested that the final environmental impact state- ment address a scaled down version of this proposal, one that pro- vides for more landscaping, better interior site design, and more compatible architecture. FnWZ_'I Valerie Sco az Town Planner B.22 OA RO ISO" Sit I FM It. .1 —US. Rl0;f — a1 t I 4:� I 2 curCHOGUE HARBOR IS • 'S.0 C TR y—, IS St ISO, .0 sit .1 .0 iii 3 r MIO -6)1 Wfoi- %s,W Sol Z6 190111111.0 SUFE K AvE a..fit cKso—M 0. 10 PECONIC BAY GREAT Sit S., KFI COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ---m SOUTH Real Prooerly Tax Service Agency 0 flit 117 —rrerl,a rlxxlw 1000 Y, Ic- n-io Y- v sn `� 0 C pct 's �✓l� L "�G�a. - e vc s o,:.d I ov ' c��Sc ve�a-.c-ti(s a `ls Gl \� o`c�lai E Scc� ✓E' ,� G��J�V'o\, at ( CI-. 6 C_7j- C c4 . �'a�Ctil �iG�i-}S Cv�d d✓v} ��5 l`> \,�X �J 1,. �,L,l 1'�l"` \✓�'r-C1.lJ O� `� � \,� �''l. 1 a'L, d �e CAA\ �c-) 'VACA ci iim^�( ✓1^'� Al'J',N uc B.24 o►� ,� �r�.z exec ev Lie -.�;1�. (f r-.�bZT`�:�-� i l7� ��'�� Com) `'``•�•� � � 1';- ? l poi 4�c� � ► 1 1 B.25 14 1S W-4'--CC\ kl-,N e )(P-c 0 t l � r CA CAWC cy Gt S , I oL �1" �r�� 'l�,i�- C�t�� ✓"V1 l7V�C� Y�'-C� (�i� Y1A�C� B.26 av` c v - ll ,S.L" aft" sck B.27 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS.M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER November 19, 1987 RECEIVED BY Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Chairman SORE TL:.:; BOARD Southold Town Planning Board N O V 19 is-811 Southold Town Hall DATE 53075 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Marina Bay Club, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) S.C.T.M. : 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr. Orlowski : The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has reviewed the above-referenced DEIS and find the document substantially incomplete and, therefore, inappropriate for the purposes of decision making. We are concerned by the lack of information pertaining to the sanitary disposal and water supply requirements, dredging impacts, and stormwater runoff controls. The specific concerns and recommendations of our department regarding the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and our environmental review of the proposed action are provided below. I . Sanitary Code An application for construction for sewage disposal facilities and water supply for this proposed project has not been submitted to our department. Complete technical comment regarding the sewage disposal facilities and water supply would require that an application be submitted to our department that includes a site plan, specifications and design details for both the sewage treatment plant (STP) and reverse osmosis (RO) system, and the required site-specific information (i .e. depth to water, soil borings, etc. ) needed to evaluate the suitability of the site for the project. The RO system providing a maximum flow of 57,600 gpd of potable water and the 30-foot horizontal well screen below the bay bottom are both unique designs for a water supply facility within Suffolk County. Without more detailed information, it is difficult to make preliminary comment on the feasibility of the system. The applicant will have to fully demonstrate to our department the capability of the system to meet our construction standards and water quality standards prior to any approval . COUNTY CENTER RIVERMEAD.N.Y 11901 p B.28 Letter to Mr. Bennett Orlowski November 19, 1987 Page 2 The STP, as proposed with denitrification, will have to be approved by our department and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) . An important consideration will be siting the STP and leaching pools on the property, while, at the same time, maintaining an adequate distance from the water supply horizontal well screen. Another consideration regarding the STP will be maintaining a two-foot separation between the bottom of the leaching pools and the water table, which is high in this area. This project is constrained by the limited space for installing the STP and leaching pools and by the potential for discharge from the STP to reach the intake area where the horizontal well screen is located. The construction of a 57,600 gpd RO system and a 30-foot horizonal well screen will require close scrutiny by our department and demonstrable results of proper operations and water quality before approval is given. Alternative water supply systems should be addressed in the DEIS. One alternative should be the installation of a conventional well , at an adequate distance below the water table, to be used in conjunction with the RO system. We recommend that the DEIS be deemed incomplete until approvable sewage disposal and water supply facility designs have been accepted by our department. No final approvals for sewage disposal facilities and water supply shall be granted by our department until the SEQRA process is completed, however. The Health Department ' s primary regulatory concern pertaining to develop- ment is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, especially Articles V and VI , and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal . At the time of application, we begin complete review for compliance. Full consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to State and Town wetland require- ments. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems. The applicant should not undertake to construct any such systems without Health Department approval . Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, e.g. Articles VII and XII , also apply to commercial development. II . Natural and Cultural Resources A. PROBABLE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1 . Surface Water/Wetlands a. Dredging The document' s discussion of potential impacts to surface waters (p.4.7) is incomplete. The discussion should address potential project-related water quality impacts to marine waters. Submissions of the appropriate State and federal applications for dredging and bulkhead construction do not exempt the applicant from addressing these areas fully in the DEIS. B.29 Letter to Mr. Bennett Orlowski November 19, 1987 Page 3 The document should explain the proposed method and timetable for all dredging and discuss potential surface water impacts resulting from the reintroduction of bottom sediments into the water column during the dredging operation. The document should also provide details of the proposed method of upland deposition and drainage of dredge spoil , including details of any proposed spoil dikes or impoundment areas, and an assessment of potential surface water impacts associated overland flow of spoil drainage of sediments into the harbor. Much of the data contained in Appendix II of the DEIS should be incorpo- rated into a narrative discussion which addresses the above-stated concerns. We recommend all dredging operations take place from October through March to reduce potential for unnatural , nutrient-induced, algal blooms, and to avoid potential disturbance to colonial waterbirds, which are known to nest and forage east of the site, in the vicinity of Cutchogue Harbor and Nassau Point. b. Pumpout Facilities We believe the proposed pumpout facilities can provide long-term water quality benefits to the harbor if used effectively. We therefore, encourage adoption of the recommendation of the Southold Town Trustees to require dock leases to have discharge/suction fittings compatible with the proposed pumpout station, thereby encouraging use of the pumpout facility. 2. Surface Runoff and Drainage a. Fill Removal The document should identify the proposed deposition site of the 5,300 cubic yards of fill expected to be removed from the subject property. Because the applicant plans to deposit excavated fill outside the Town of Southold, we believe the applicant should contact the Town of Riverhead regarding this matter and demonstrate any necessary approvals that may be required prior to under- taking this action. b. . Grading and Drainage The grading and drainage plans and discussion provided (Figure 12) in the DEIS are insufficient for technical evaluation. We recommend the applicant prepare a detailed assessment of the site's surface runoff, and prepare drainage control plans that include the following: 1 . Delineation of existing and proposed grades 2. Delineation of drainage area 3. Complete drainage calculations 4. Leaching pool and overflow system design specifications 5. Boundary delineation of all impervious and pervious surfaces 6. Test hole data, indicating depth to groundwater B.30 Letter to Mr. Bennett Orlowski November 19, 1987 Page 4 3. Visual and Cultural Resources The document's presentation of the site' s historic and cultural signifi- cance is useful and prepared well . Because the site represents a locally significant historic resource in the Village of New Suffolk, we hope site reconstruction will incorporate architectural and other recommendations of local historians and village residents to achieve a design and size commensurate with the goals and objections of the community. B. ALTERNATIVES The document's presentation of alternatives provides detail sufficient for comparative assessment and was helpful to our review. Notwithstanding our department' s reservations about the applicant' s proposed wastewater and water supply systems, we believe a modified project design similar to Alternative C provides an opportunity to mitigate unavoidable impacts to a greater extent than the applicant' s desired plan or the other alternatives presented. Such a design should only be considered, however, if the applicant agrees to maximize pervious surfaces, incorporate the use of floating dock platforms to the greatest extent practicable, and construct a pumpout facility. In addition, we recommend that the applicant provide a public fishing area similar to that proposed for the desired action, and incorporate a detailed landscaping plan which uses native vegetation. These mitigation measures will help reduce the magnitude of project-related impacts to visual , human, and wildlife resources. C. SUMMARY We find the DEIS for the proposed action incomplete for the purpose of review and encourage the Town to request information from the applicant that responds to the above-stated concerns of our department. We appreciate the opportunity to review this project, and trust our concerns will be appropriately addressed. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience. Sincerely, i Louise W. Harrison Supervisor, Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/amf cc: Vito Minei , P.E. Steve Costa, P.E. Robert Greene, NYSDEC Charles Hamilton, NYSDEC Thomas Hart, NYSDOT B.31 HENRY P. SMITH, President TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. Ln (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD .� ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN .� �i[ ��O RECE:\-rl, BY BOARD OF TOV'N TRUSTEES SOUTHG I�} i IL.,,•... .� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ho Y 19 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road DATE P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: Southold Town Planning Board, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner From: Town Trustees, John Bredemeyer, Vice President Re: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Marina Bay Club Date: November 19, 1987 In response to your request for comments on the above matter the Town Trustees offer the following: 1. Is R.O. Unit 6' below bottom really pumping bay water or New Suffolk's Glacial (sole) source? 2. Details on incorporation of marine pump out waste into S.T.P. should be addressed. Pre-treat/truck off site etc. 3. Design of marine pump out left to imagination. Pump out should provide fixed collection system on permanent docks in order to serve every slip. Design of suction and recharge should be presented along with rationale. 4. Question of underwater grants and ownership of bottom will have to be addressed prior to approvals. 5. Pb content of some bottom samples seems elevated - further review of this by Army Corps and N.Y.S. D.E.C. suggested for F.E.I.S. so this issue can be put to rest if it is/is not Significant. 6. Trustees specifically interested in discussion on ability of project to maintain docking space and facilities for traditional fishing and marine commercial uses per our involved agency request of 6-23-86. 7. 1987 Trustee permits (permits over Trustee "owned" Bay Bottom) currently preclude use of TBT bottom paints on all but aluminum hulls and outdrives. Any expansion or new facilities in the Wetlands (Chapter 97) jurisdiction will likely require this. Project sponsors may wish to comment on this and their willingness to preclude sale of TBT for general hull use until formal rules are imposed by Federal or State Law. This issue has surfaced post scoping session. 8. Lift well construction should include separate drywell for wash down waste which will be heavy metal laden and should be separated from direct discharge. B.32 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road O P.O. B6x 1179 TFLF.PHONE 0� Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1801 r RE'-,--EIJVED BY WOVSOUTHOLD TOWN SOUTh1 9 .. CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL 987 ;;a E November 19, 1987 Capon reading the DE 113 for the Marina Ba.v C1Ltb the Conservation Hdvisory Council have some OuestiGns and concerns that would seem to need further et:olanation or consideration. 1. Number of boat sliDs- It seems evident that marinas do pGllut_. We are not sa•:inq that the 001lution is deliberate but rather an accidental ti'.'-GrCdUCt of DeOD1e LtSinO their boat=_ . What int OrmatiGn 1 there: as to the _,ire of a marina and the 1 mpaCt o+ the i nad ✓ertent Doll lit 1 or. that is cenerated' Is th 1 = pro ;;---r--t oversized for lt_ 10Cat1Or," C•_.n t h a s,CGDe D+ the pro ,ect t.-1-E- rE,ducE•d to I owE:•r the i net--,vertent El 01 1 ut.i cn tt 0CC+_tr and s t i 11 be Drof 1 t a t I e for the own�=•r 1 C a. _,mai i er nUfTlner of =_I 1 Ds an aI ternatl v ^ b.h0Lil d a o•_-1rt i on G+ 11 n apo1 1 Ccr+t' n underwater land ne set a.s1 re c.s an en v ronmen ta l buffer to town Waters- ?. Runoff- In terms o+ mi tadati nd m_a_ures. + 1 rst . if (T-1 0 r F than two inchs:s of rain Der hour fa'I . the road. Dari and lets. roof and other runoff is Oc•ind to co nrectly into t!-ie ba,,, . hc-�w o-Ften d0=s this haDDen^ Is t h i s Dr_Cedure 1 _oatI and enviromentally acceotable"' Road runoff is a maior contributnr of 001lution to Our creeks and bays. Can this e:sce_s runoff be Greatly reduced or eliminated" Secondly. is there ❑Gino to oe sufficient Drotection and safeguards from the rain runoff c- thce dredged sDo11 Et it is bei no duMD=d. stored and =Dread d'tr,. no construction'..' Are the concentration=- cf the heav`✓ metal ref the dredged ma.terl al s acceDtab1 e^ W4 11 storm water ru.nCD f e cont=.ined on the DroDerty dur in3 �t_n�l^..1 Constr UCtion? �. Houseboats'=`:1?- J.+ bo,-at= of considerable E 1 Z e a.r= be rice DerrrlE,nent1V berthed in these slims. do the=_e be �.t .. .en essentiall •, becorne waterfront c 1 C,e _ _. OndGmir+lLlm= in :Vh Ch GJ1e ) 1 .c for the entire SL!+T+mer`:' Has this Qn .'l r c.menta.1. 1 C_,UC' L _en addr eEsed' Can it be 1 eoal 1 v Qi-E•.'er,ts•d Etnd more .. mr..7,,— - en-Forced- B.33 4_ Boundary of the docks- Are the Doi sons that are coy no to be used to protect the docF:.s. floats and solash t+oards from marine growth and rot aoina to effect town bav bottom and town waters';' What is the data on the leachino of these poisons^ What is the life of these leached ooi sons^ Should a portion o+ the aoolicant' s underwater land oe set aside as an enviromental b`bundary. buffer to town waters'"' 5. Salinity effect of the reverse osmosis system- Will the more dense and more saline wastewater form a l er c_;� the bottom'? Could higher salinity ooc�.ets be estanlished in bottom holes? What does the outfall patterns loot; lii.e : n res,:ect to the surrounding shallower waters. currents and ti des Very minor change_ in salinity have been shown to have ma ,cr e++ects on larva of _>hel l f i sh. has this been considered' 6• Fuel tanks - Fuel tanks always present a danger of leakage. Has consideration been made regarding the installation of double- walled tanks with a leakage detection? B.34 tom• .a Southold Town Baymen's Assn. Inc. POST OFFICE BOX 523 GREENPORT, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11944 November 12, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board t Southold, N.Y. 11971 , ,, f -7 Re ; DEIS for the Marina Bay Club - DArE Dear Members, In reviewing the DEIS for the Marina Bay Club project we have concluded the following. 1) The confiscation of three acres of public bay bottom can- not be allowed. Is every citizen of N.Y.State going to reeieve his or her 3 acres and will the concept of public land be abol- ished. The other fact is that much of this 3 acre parcel was a productive scallop ground until the advent of the brown tide. 2) Dredging 27,000 eu. yd.s. of bottom is stated to be non-sig- nificant. For the Town of Southold this is significant. For ex- ample the Southold Town Trustees now have a policy of limiting any creek dredging; project to under 100 yards. We further question whether the concentrations of heavy metals and other elements such as tin, copper, lead, chromium, mercury, arsenic, etc. , mpke this dredge material suitable for fill. We also question the advisability of the dredging process dispersing these materials into the water column of the Peeonic system. 3) 39- leaching pools collectins extensive parking lot runoff will eventually concentrate hydro carbons in ground adjacent to Peconie Bay. The dumping of 7,000 gal/day (washdown etc . ) of chlor- inated water by marina use into the bay will create a detriment to the marine ecology. The lack of backup for the sewage treat- ment plant makes us nervous about the effects of a system break- down so close to the bay. 4) Placing underground fuel storage tanks directly adjacent to the bay seems to invite environmental disaster in case of a breach. Port of Egypt And the Greenport Shipyard have recently installed above ground diked fuel tanks to help mitigate any tank holding failures. 5) The Reverse Osmosis water system, used at peak performance, will return 100,800 gal/day of 1.4 % normal salinity water to the bay. A policy of returning water at original salinity levels might be the beat way to mitigate any ecological alterations to the bay. 6) While this project incorporates certain guidelines of the 44 N.Y.S. Coastal Zone Management Policies, there a7te many other Policies that are not implemented and in fact are.An contravention with this project (#s 7,8,9,10,30 and 31) . The claim usin #4, that commercial fishing will be enhanced by this projecpolicy t, is totally false. Quite frankly commercial fishermen will gain noth- ing from this project and could lose much. The statement at the public hearing for this DEIS that there are marinas from Montauk to Riverhead similar in size, brings one fact into focus. Every marina cited is in an area now uncertified and closed to shellfish- ing. B.35 Y. Southold Town B.aymen's Assn. Inc. POST OFFICE BOX 523 GREENPORT, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11944 The Long Island Regional Planning Board 208 study of• 1978 concluded that in order to maintain a healthy Peeonie Bay estu- arine system, all further development in shoreline areas should be prohibited or severely restricted. To date this message has been ignored and we now have the Brown Tide to verify this studies conclusions. We conclude that this project should be out way back in size. While a limited amount of expansion incorporating mitigating en- vironmental technology could be a benefit to the community, the scope of this project far exceeds the needs and ecological lim- itations of the New Suffolk and Cutchogue Harbor region. Rag pectfully, I-C'GPe r dJeA0zel president Steve Latson secretary B.36 RECEIVED BY SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD NEW SUFFOLK NOT191987 CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC . DATE ,e: ... F 1 1, f. R l) x - i W j U F F 0 L K, N. Y Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Karina Bay Club DEIS New Suffolk, N.Y. Gentlepersons: We submit herewith, the comments and remarks prepared by Patrick Callahan, P.E., who is experienced in the field, and who is a member of the Committee of New Suffolk residents which has been monitoring this proposed project. The Committee and the New Suffolk Civic Association, Inc. associate themselves with these comments and remarks. The Committee as a whole would like to emphasize its pref- erence (comment 5) for modifying the depth of the leaching pools, increas- ing their number to compensate for the reduced depth, as required, and distributing necessitated increases in height, IF ANY, over the entire site to the extent possible, thereby minimizing the impact, and distrib- uting it as equitably as possible. We would also like to emphasize (comment 1 ) the position you have already taken in your letter dated January 5, 1987 to Mr. Raynor, which asks that the project take into consideration in the site plan pro- posal, what underwater property is not conveyed, implying, if not con- cluding, that underwater lands outside of valid grants are off limits. Our major concern with respect to the site plan proposal, as expressed at the public hearing and with the plan's proponents direct- ly, has to do with the size of the project and the traffic, parking and other consequences of size. We favor reasonable efforts to minimize the size of this project. Respectfully submitted, The New Suffolk Civic Association, Inc. by ose Fenton, Committee Chairman New Suffolk Committee Joseph Fenton. Patrick Callahan Jack Pis^er Laura Avent William Fisher Linda Fletcaer B.37 COMMENTS AND REMARKS ON THE JULY 1987 DEIS PREPARED IN CONNECTION WITH PROPOSED MARINA BAY CLUB DEVELOPMENT NEW SUFFOLK - LONG ISLAND - N.Y. 1 ) THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AS SUBMITTED IS NOT REFLECTIVE OF THE SCOPE OF THE INTENDED ACTION BY THE APPLICANT WHICH APPARENTLY INCLUDES EXPANDING THE DOCKING FACILITIES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF UNDERWATER LANDS EITHER PREVIOUSLY USED FOR MARINE PURPOSES ADJACENT TO THE UPLAND PROPERTY OR WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE "1838 GRANT" . AS A RESULT IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT EITHER: a) THE PROCESS BE SUSPENDED BY MUTUAL CONSENT OF THE APPLICANT AND THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE APPLICANT BE GIVEN SUFFICIENT TIME TO REVISE THE DEIS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REFERENCE AND SUPPORT FOR THE FULL PROPOSED ACTION; OR, b) THE PROCESS CONTINUE WITH AN AMMENDMENT TO THE DEIS TO CLARIFY THAT THE DEIS EXCLUDES THE AFORESAID EXPANSION AREA BEYOND THE ROUGHLY 6 ACRE SITE EITHER FULLY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE APPLICANT OR THE NOW OR FORMER OWNER, MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC . REMARKS: The above comment is made recognizing the excellent cooperation between the Applicant and the people of New Suffolk on the matter of restoring to full operation an expanded marina with an upgraded restaurant and other associated facilities at the North Fork Shipyard site . The bulk of the upland development issues are addressable in some form however, since the project was initiated there has been a substantial increase in the size of the marina. The current proposed plan as depicted on Figure 4 Phase I and II drawings indicate an overall develop- ment of roughly 7 . 5 to 8 acres. Of particular concern is the approximately 150' x 400' extension to the east beyond the easterly boundary of the N.Y. S. Grant . We do understand that less than half of the N.Y. S. Grant area has been utilized by the upland owner but generally support its full utilization recognizing the economic constraints of a lesser development . Extending to the east however is not clearly within the rights of the upland owner notwithstanding the host of regulatory B.38 -2- approvals attendant to the process. A COE or DEC permit, a CZM determination etc. does not in anyway convey property rights to the Applicant . To assist in providing some clarity on the use of the under- water lands adjacent to the site we are enclosing a copy of a letter dated January 5, 1987 from the Southold Town Planning Board on the matter with attachments. Further, we would like to see the DEIS focus on the issue of loss of productive bay bottom should the marina be granted approval to extend to the limits proposed. This point was brought to the attention of the Planning Board at the November 9, 1987 Hearing by Mr. Steve Latson, Secretary, Bay- men' s Association. If it is intended to modify the DEIS to take into account the full site, we suggest that throughout the DEIS the appropriate reference be made to the incremental increase in size , process for approval and related environmental issues as noted above . 2) THE PROPOSED RO SYSTEM FOR SUPPLYING WATER WILL REPRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL INITIAL INVESTMENT AND PROBABLY HIGH OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PRIOR CORRESPOND- ENCE FROM THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED CONDO DEVELOPMENT BE EXAMINED. IN PARTICULAR, IT WOULD APPEAR THAT AN OFF-SITE SOURCE OF POTABLE WATER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WHICH IN FACT COULD ALSO SERVE OTHER RESIDENTS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE VICINITY WHO HAVE SUB-STANDARD WATER SUPPLY. REMARKS: The above comment was discussed with the Applicant and also discussed in general with no commitment at the recent New Suffolk Civic Association meeting. It appears that an unusual opportunity may exist for both the Applicant and the community should an adequate source of water be located and provision be made to include residents and others in the vicinity in a distribution system. One such possible source B.39 -3- could be the open field adjacent to the School House . If in fact it were found feasible and the economics were favorable as a condition to such use, the lands upon which a well(s) are installed should remain under the Town' s jurisdiction to insure the continued availability of the water supply and as a common recreation area for the community. We suggest the the SCDHS, DEC and Town of Southold provide assistance and advice to the Applicant on the feasibility of this suggestion. Approval or disapproval of any off-site source of water would of course, have to be treated on its own merit and as such should not impact on the procedure for accepting the DEIS. 3) THE PROXIMITY OF THE PROPOSED UTILITY BUILDING HOUSING THE PACKAGED TREATMENT PLANT TO NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES COULD HAVE LONG TERM NEGATIVE IMPACT . THE PROBABLE WIDE VARIATIONS IN WASTE STREAM FLOW CAN HAVE MAJOR EFFECTS ON PLANT OPERATION CAUSING AN INCREASE IN ODORS AND OPERATIONAL IMBALANCE. ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS SHOULD BE EXPLORED. REMARKS: The above comment was discussed with the Applicant and strong s.upport was voiced at the recent New Suffolk Civic Association meeting for relocating the treatment plant to within the site . The Applicant has expressed an understanding for our concern and has directed his professional staff to seek an alternate location on site in the vicinity of the Boat Storage Shed. It is noted that some earlier plans called for the sewage treatment plant to be located nearby the Post Office . 4) THE LEACHING POOLS ARE A COMMON ELEMENT OF THE PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEMS UTILIZING PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT. WE STRESS THAT THE SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS BE EXPLORED IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ASSURE THE LEACHING SYSTEM CAN FUNCTION ADEQUATELY. OF CONCERN IS a) HIGH WATER TABLE, b) TIDAL INFLUENCE, c) PRE-EXISTING MEADOW MAT, d) PRIOR LAND FILL, AND e ) GRADE. ASSUMING ADEQUATE LEACHING POOL CAPACITY, WE RECOM- MEND CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO SEPARATING THE WASTE STREAM SO THAT SCDHS STANDARDS FOR CONVENTIONAL OR MODIFIED IN-GROUND SYSTEMS COULD BE SATISFIED. B.40 -4- REMARKS: Again this recommendation was discussed with the Applicant and it was indicated that the criteria for determining the type of waste treatment took into account the total waste stream, the area of the property and overall site conditions such as being within a flood zone . We do however recommend that the Applicant explore with the SCDHS what options may be available given their vast experience in dealing with similar developments in the County. 5) THE DEIS IS NOT ENTIRELY CLEAR ON THE EXTENT OF GRADING AND ALTERATION TO THE SITE ELEVATIONS. PORTIONS OF THE DEIS WOULD APPEAR TO INDICATE ONLY MINOR CHANGES ARE PROPOSED, HOWEVER, EXAMINATION OF A FULL SCALE GRADING PLAN WOULD INDICATE THE SITE IS TO BE RAISED THREE OR FOUR FEET. WE RECOMMEND THAT - THE EXISTING SITE GRADE BE MAINTAINED TO THE MAXIMUM PRACTICAL EXTENT. REMARKS: Raising the site would have a large visual impact . We under- stand that the Applicant has made an effort to minimize the negative impact by proposing to create a landscaped slope rather than building retaining walls. We realize that the grading requirement as proposed by the designers relates to the probable need to provide sufficient effective leaching area above the groundwater table . 6) THERE IS NO SINGLE UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED METHOD OF DEALING WITH MANY OF THE "QUALITY OF LIFE" IMPACTS OF ANY DEVELOPMENT. IN SOME MEASURE NEW SUFFOLK COULD BE SAID TO HAVE EXTREMELY LOW THRESHOLD LEVELS WHICH WOULD TO ITS INHABITANTS, SIGNAL A PERCEPTION OF POLLUTION AND DETERIORATION. WE STRESS THAT THE APPLICANT IN DIRECTING HIS PROFESSIONALS IN THE DEVELOP- MENT OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PARTICULARLY FOR THE ELEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH NOISE, LIGHT AND TRAFFIC BE MINDFUL OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF EACH ACTION. B.41 -5- REMARKS: Given that New 'Suffolk today has virtually no measurable noise or identifiable source ; no major contributor to light pollution nor any significant traffic, any change is regarded as being a negative impact . Through earlier discussion with the Applicant, we believe our suggestions to mitigate noise pro- ducing AC systems, air handling units, refrigeration motors etc. will be done in the course of the design. In the course of construction the pile driving operation and heavy marine work is estimated to take about 16 months to complete . We recommend that an effort be directed to complete the bulk of this work in late fall-early spring to minimize the noise exposure to the pile driving operation. Also we understand low level lighting rather than flood light- ing will be called for. This is an important measure not alone from our side of the Harbor but also for people living along the westerly shore of Nassau Point . So far as traffic is concerned it can hardly be said that a fourfold increase is not significant . We ask that the design provide for lessening the concentration of the traffic and the operation and schedul- ing of the use of the facilities seek to lower the impact of coincident activities. 7 ) THE IMMEDIATE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE FELT BY THOSE FAMILIES AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ALONG FIRST STREET AND MAIN STREET. THE OVERALL NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD ATTEMPT TO RECOGNIZE THIS IMPACT AND MITIGATE AGAINST ITS POSSIBLE NEGATIVE ItTLICATIONS. REMARKS: Specific recommendations include consideration to moving the proposed location of the Boat Storage Shed further within the property to reduce its visual impact on First Street . Also the overall level of development and aesthetic treatment should take into account that a decrease in the value and investment of adjacent and nearby property owners should not be a second- ary effect of the development . We are pleased to note the Applicant ' s acceptance of our suggestion to have a representa- tive committee of New Suffolk people contribute suggestions for maintaining the historic significance o•f the site . B.42 L.L "T upbpglD'.v 30`,RT 117 -10LD Nov 10 3.3 Tin ------- TOWN -4ALL DATE PiAlid RO nL L,�1),-or,,,q yOljR- '30UTHO _%� � I -RE: APPLICAT IO`_,� 0-F -,..l;A7T-:TA ?AY L -(;-7�k'-,D T. CARR 'J_3 _j ( J_ -A -, UFFOLT-K Tl A 7 ArT C F LOWSDT TOPT) F S,i ,7 n-L -7D ""]',3 1. - op OAV ROAD, 0 PlY As z .)I - , - !0 1 '-JOUL�) Ll AD ) OU H R., -',-TO iL "M AnOVE-rA` `2107"T:::) Cpp )q_TTML"l Ti , PTLE� THANK IlLy 31ARBA-Rk A U F UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE P.O. Box 534 »f 705 White Horse Pike Absecon, New Jersey 08201 (609) 646-9310 December 11, 1987 Ms. Janet F. Haeberle, Legal Assistant Pelletreau and Pelletreau 20 Church Street Box 110 Patchogue, New York 11772 Dear Ms. Haeberle: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( Service) has reviewed the draft environmental impact statement, provided by your letter, dated October 23 , 1987, on the Marina Bay Club located near Cutchogue Harbor, Little Peconic Bay at New Suffolk, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. We provide the following for your consideration. These comments do not represent the official comments of the Service in accordance with Section 2(b) of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667e). General Comments The subject document adequately describes the fish and wildlife resources of the area. We concur that the proposed activity is more consistent with New York State Coastal Zone Management policies than the previously proposed condominium development which would have eliminated much public access to the waterway. The proposed marina use is water—dependent and will maintain public access and provide views of the waterway. Specific Comments Page 3 .18 discusses the purpose of the significant coastal habitats program and indicates that the New York State Department of State is conducting public hearings regarding habitat designations. This comment is somewhat outdated as many significant coastal habitats for Suffolk County received formal designation in March 1987. The purpose of the program is well defined. Page 4.6 provides the calculations for the wastewater solute concentration to be generated by the reverse osmosis water treatment unit. The wastewater solute concentration will be approximately 1 .5% greater than existing receiving water conditions. Although this increase is rather small, chronic, but slight bottom salinity increases, could result. Salinity increases may result in an environment more suitable to a variety of shellfish predators, particularly the Forbes seastar (Asterias forbesi). Slight impacts to the shellfish industry, particularly to local waters, could occur depending on other external environmental influences. B.44 Page 4.14 discusses why wood is the chosen material for marina construction purposes. Creosote is recommended as an important wood preservative. The Service prefers wood to be pressure treated with preservative salts in light of creosote's properties which allow it to leach from wood. Creosote is a known carcinogen which could adversely impact' the health of local aquatic resources. Page 4.38 details the placement and operation of the proposed on site sewage treatment plant. We concur that operation of this facility will greatly improve existing septic practices. However, information should be provided as to the level of treatment which will be achieved and how this compares to current Suffolk County Department of Health standards. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this document. Please contact Mr. Tom Sperry of guy Long lslar:d staff at (516) 282-3300 if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Michael T. Chezik Acting' Supervisor IMP 2 B.45 SCHOOL OF HOTEL ADMINISTRATION CORNER.UNIVERSTIY STATR?R HALL 1THACA,NY 14853-6901 TELEX.WUL6713054 November 30, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board Southold Town Officer Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Richard Carr, my client, has asked me to write you regarding the proposed Marina Bay Club. I am a professor at the School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, and was the principal author of the restaurant feasibility study which was incorporated into the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that was submitted to your Board. I based my recommendations on several factors. First, you should know I am a long-term resident of Southold, where I continue to own a home. From 1968 through 1973 , I owned and managed The Carriage House Restaurant, Main Road, Southold, on the site now occupied by Joanthony's. Because of my personal and professional interests, I have monitored restaurant activity on The North Fork for several years. I recommended the following seating capacity for the proposed facility in New Suffolk: 150-seat dining room, a 75-seat holding/lounge area and an additional 75-seat outdoor dining area to be used during the peak season (July and August) . This is based upon my professional judgment for market demand for a first-class, seafood-oriented facility. It is also consistent with the size of several existing restaurants on The North Fork, e.g. , Sound.view, Claudios and The Seafood Barge. Please feel free to call upon me if you wish any additional information. Sincerely, Stephen A. Mutkoski, Ph.D. The Villa Banfi Professor of Wine Education and Management SAM: sw xc:Richard T. Carr John J. Hart, Esq. Jean Celender B.46 RECENED BY S�,61 G L- BOARD r, ��,..-. I `� _ NOV 1 1 ~1 1 yl +N 1 B.47 a� B.4 8 B.49 . L \ ��1.�L-�-v�✓�- Com- '�-C7�^'��;r"�--� � �ti'`. l IIS- B.51 (CD kt�kr A-)al -AA -2- -Zo L CA-+� co- rn e ,,a� LL> Aj A o B.52 -4 4..; to �"-�Jv+�� -iyC��+/`� X�n°�nC �e� 011 0. �a.._,� ►.�a.�(-�-�. l��Q�. s �.a.�.,t��_ _�.R_�..nt.A. -,a.�.�.wn.�.(�I w1d "JLc GD -- - ------ -- - -- - ZL. Sir- . b B.53 Clr LA- - ----- ... .... PUI B.54 --- --- RECEIVED o _ 4 DATE 15 November, 1987 Town planning Board Town Hall Southdd, N.Y. Dear Sir: Some acquaintences and I have collected signatures on a petition asking that, principally, the size of the develop- ment at the old North Fork Shipyard be held down, considerably below the size planned by Mr. Carr the developer. We trust that you, in your deliberations, will take our views into account. Sincerely yours, —e;r B.55 i '�Wo the undersigned resident* of the area running along Now ;Suffolk Avenue from Mattitutk to Now Suffolk and along Now ,18uffelk Read from Cutchegue to Now Suffolk view xith alarm the projected 400% increase in traffic to �bo generated by the Marina Bay Club development at the old INerth Fork Shipyard, !and urge The Town of Southold to hold down the size of the Idsvelepmont to a more reasonable Goals than the planned 137 (beat slips, the 400-seat restaurant, and the 100-berth dry- I�Yterage facility for small boats. (name address 77 Y11 1, 1 V '75.- I s � i B.56 the undersigned residents of the area running along Nov iteffolk Avenue from Mattituck to Now Suffolk and along Nov lSuff•lk Read from Cutchegue to New Suffolk ,view with alarm the projected 400% increase in traffic to 1Ib• generated by the Marina Bay Club development at the old Nor h Fork Shipyard, land urge The Town of Southold to hold down the site of the development to a more reasonable soale �hx.-11,,,��h�1,p��+nn•d 137 eat slips, the 400-seat rostaurant,"'din iho Id$°-�bK, dry- I.terage facility for small beats. ,name address Z 1 , 9 t ;l� 0 Alt tS i f7 1 f ' J � ff B.57 .No the undersigned resident2 of the area running along Now Suffolk Avenue from Mattituck to Now Suffolk and along New ;Suffolk Road from CutchoguK to New Suffolk view with alarm the prejec-iA 400% increase in traffic to ;;be generated by the Marina Bay Club development at the old lNerth Fork Shipyard, Band urge The Town of Southeld to hold down the size of the jdevelepment to a more reaso, ble 9011s than the planned 137 !beat slips, the 400-seat roetaurant, and the 100-berth dry- ,storage facility for small !•-oats. !name address 2-1 0 L / !i / Cl 1117 .2!3CAla Sly V1 ru L !V�/ !r wJ• f / ��D ter 1'/c�i/t�CL ( y (,Cr l'ks G� I I 1 1 ' dr � •Ittre YCl ��-- ,C B.58 - i i; ,Ve the undersigned residents rrf the area running along New 5uffelk Avenue from Mattituck to New Suffolk and along New �;Buffolk Road from Cutchoguo to Now Suffolk ,view with alarm the projected h00% increase in traffic to 11be generated by the M.-�rina Bay Club development at the old H1'North Fork Shipyard, and urge The Town of Southold to hold down the size of the ,Idovelopment to a were reasonable 90alo than the planned 137 (boat slips, the 400-seat restaurant, and the 100-bKth dry- ,;storage facility for small boats. name address u c 3 S ,a 5 �L.L/c:-/,iC�7 L�C.fi?Li .L -- � \ Y iX X, ti 16 4�z 3�s (7 i - CCi 1 , S '6 B.59 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold , New York 11971 RE : Marina Bay Club , New Suffolk , NY Dear Mr . Orlowski : Our home and another house we own are located to the north-west across the street from the proposed Marina Bay Club and will be directly affected by this facility. We are not opposed to the improvement of this parcel and the marina/res- taurant complex, however we are very concerned about the size and certain other aspects . It would seem that the proposed size of the marina and restaurant are out of line with what is needed . A 300 seat res- taurant and 137 slip boat marina is too large . The traffic generated by the facility would be unbearable . Not only that , but there are only approximately 170 parking spaces ! Parking for employees alone would take up at least 25 spaces . The overflow from customers of the complex would spill out into the surrounding neighborhood . Parking for Bonnies-by-the-Bay , a restaurant on First Street across from the Marina Bay Club , fills the street in that area during the summer . They do not have off-street parking and conceivably some of Bonnies customers might park in the Club ' s parking lot . Other factors that are of concern are the underground fuel tanks , the reverse osmosis system, the noise generated by this system as well as the sewerage treatment plant , pollution to the Bay , lights , chemical storage , elevation of the site , flooding caused by same and noise in general . We would sincerely appreciate your addressing these problems and taking them into serious consideration before approval of the DEIS is given . Very truly yours , Mr . & Mrs . Carl S . Avent B.60 UF1`t November 19, 1987 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE : Proposed Marina Bay Club New Suffolk, New York Dear Members of the Board: It is respectfully requested that the Planning Board determine a limitation on the scope of the proposed Marina Bay Club project in New Suffolk to a size that can be realistically supported by this small rural community, a marina use that will enhance its natural resources rather than exploit them. Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas M. Martin Ja ne P. Martin B.61 ...v...+lJ r.....r r.... .. ..• V. .l November 15, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re : Application of Marina Bay Club (Richard T. Carr) New Suffolk, New York Chairman Orlowski and Members of the Board: As residertc of Jackslon Street, New Suffolk, my husband, Edward K. Holland , Jr. . , and I would like to acrd our voices to those in strong opposition to the above-captioned application. Be�foare setting forth our reason) far doing �_ I would like to offer the Board a bit of information concerning my backgroun.a. I was secret,IT,%r to the Southold Town Board of Appeals , under Robert Gil.li.spi,= 's chairmanship, from :.0,76 to 19780. For the next six years I was employed by Charles E. Raffe , Esq. , an attorney in pi crhead whose practice , to a groat c,Ztent, con- sists of handling real estate transactions in all their various aspects . I uas then employed by a local engineering/development firm for almost two years . I feel my experience over this 10- year span giv►,_s me a rather unique insight, not only into the legal and technical procedures that must be followed by the appli- cant, but al-so into the behind-the-scer.es maneuverings and, for lack of a better :word , psychology that, goes into trying to bring a project su--h as the Marina Day Club to fruition. We would l i'r.-, to offor the following general. comments fo. the Phan& .' consideration: 1 . First of all, ` e would ntror.gl.y urge the Board to r.';mwi ber that this 'yEI:: was bought and paid. for ';y Mr. Carr's organization. In no way can this document be labeled an unbiased assessment o)' the impact of this project on New Suffolk. ::o d:oviloper is going to sperd thouoands of B.62 Southold Town Planning Board November 15, 1987 Page 2 dollars for a document that shows his project would have an adverse effect on the environ- ment. As we all know, statistics can basically be manipulated to support whatever argument one wishes to present. Points in one 's favor are printed in bold capital letters and expounded upon in great detail. Findings not entirely supportive of one 's position are buried in a small paragraph at the end of a chapter, if mentioned at all. 2. Mr. Carr and his attorney, Mr. Hart, are making a great show of their belief that Mr. Carr has an irrefutable right to the approximately three acres of underwater lands covered by the Southold Town and New York State grants. As was brought up at the hearing by Mr. Lowry, many residents of the village are seriously questioning the validity of this claim and will be researching this particular point in great detail in the weeks to corre . I would ask the Board to keep in mind that this is a controversial issue and not a fait accompli, as Mr. Carr would have you believe . 3 . In _t: gard to the sewage treatment plant and reverse osmosis water system, Mr. Callahan, an engineer who spoke for the New Suffolk Civic Association at the recent hearing, is much more qualified than I to offer specific objections . I would just like to urge the Board to give a great deal of consideration to his comments and those of the Baymen's Association regarding the effect of the effluent and excess saline on our er_virorment. Furthermore , due to the question which has been raised concerning the possibility that: the Riverhead sewage treatment plant has contributed to and/or caused the "brown tide" problem we have experienced for the past three seasons , it is highly questionable whether another sewage treatment plant should be allowed until this matter has been fully resolved. 4. Perhaps the single issue which most concerns our re,;idents about the Marina Bay Club's applica- tion is the increase in traffic which would be 1p.enerated by this project. Using -t;he figures contained in the ALIS , it is estimated that, B.63 Southold Town Planning; Board November 15, 1987 Page 3 at peak times during the summer, months , there will be an increase in traffic on our roads of approximately 400 percent. Yet this same DEIS states that there will be no appreciable impact on our village due to this increase . This is ludicrous . I certainly rope that the Board will give a great deal of thought to the effect this added volume of traffic would have on our system of roads . In conclusion, I would like to state my strongest objection to this project in its entirety. Everyone in our vi?lag, would , gree that the site , as it presently stands , could use a great deal of improvement. Most residents have no objection to a smaller, more Environmentally realistic business-marine use of the property, although there are many of us who would dearly�.ove to se. thi- site taken over by the municipality under one of the land preservation acts . However, at the recent hearing, when the question of reducinE the expansion of the marina to a reasonable size was raised , Mr. Hart quickly trotted. over to the miercph.ore and stated that an operation of this proposed extent is necessary in order to meet; My. Carr's carrying costs . We heard a flowery speech about how this would be a quality, hi_gh- class operation that would be of great benefit to t'he people of ;ew Siif folk, et . , etc . . Gentlemen, as I told you at thn beginni.n,g, I have been on all sides of this process for years , and if `here 's one thing 1 know, it's this : Nr. Carr isinthis "Co make a great deal of money, and that's it. He can pay all the lip service he wants -t-.o "the great spirit of cooperation with the people of New Suffolk" , his interest in preserving our .special niche in history, and the countless blessings 'that would flow to the town by virtue of this project - his eye is on the bottom lire, and a good show of public relations will only hasten the time before he realizes a substantial return on his investment. We in New Suffolk have a much more intangible goal before us - to preserve our village, our environment, and our way of life , not only for ourselves but for future generations to enjoy. Simply stated, MR . CARR 'S PROFIT MARGIN DOES NOT HAVE TO BE 'MET AT THE COST OF OUR QUALITY OF LIFE. The recent elections snow that the majority of people in the Town of Southold agree. T thank tt;e Board for vote r time and consideration. R :pec:tfully yours , ,o %Mary, D. Holla d B.64 T— TlAff- -t;— 5W i t=v L lL AQ .9 T L 55 pmr-�p f;CV,—'O►- uxt N T—WtLL- C)trS -CA0-f 'k v T-l+Ls L C, T h t-T -V C.) IA b -(7- Gs,PPA-o u Lgr— 'rtk is 0 PO S-L -C L (Z-C--7 ^L-I Z-L FVT-- L,1-T n+� oLkjt-%,4q-- t+Ac, -F-\J*,,zlc>x-\j M L,ci , �� ^VL C-t-,:- L-, PLa-op.-,g- -I t"A m� I-If evu T'Ll E— (Z IF-$L Dit-r-L'TS --oca-�rw Sur--tm-at-L<— A,2-- 4* a w L vo �i-A V CF-- rO t-I U (F- k -T b+- !tet-1 r--Lj-C %Aj 5, A-OT-tk-P--- I ou � -AQ LF- IF, � L Z s; 7 (AT- Lrn-s d /Z Lr B.65 November 13, 1987 Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 _ b 109 1 _ u,a t Gentlemen: In the hearing held at Town Hall on Monday, November 9, 1987 I expressed my opinion that the proposed Marina Bay Club is not a good plan for New Suffolk, and that many other people in the town agree with me . I resented, and continue to resent, hearing the lawyer for the developer taking the position of speaking for the people of the village , claiming that they (we) are pleased with the plan. I believe that our village will be crushed in the developer' s need for profit, which has caused him to propose a project which is completely out of proportion to the size of New Suffolk. If this plan is allowed to go through, there will be more customers at the restaurant (300) than there are permanent residents of the hamlett We are already inundated with cars on summer weekends, the public beach is overflowing, the public parking lots filled, cars and boat trailers parked on the streets for blocks around. We already have more noise at the large public parking tot than many of us can stand without calling the police to inter- vene . We already have inebriated drivers leaving the small local bar in the middle of the night, drag racing up Main Street, careening around corners with screeching tires. Will we enjoy having a larZer bar so more people can be served? We already have flooded streets during storms -- where will all the water that cannot percolate down through the sand because of a paved surface for parking go? We already have bay water so brown with algae that you cannot see your feet in three feet of water -- shall we risk adding sewage and motor oil from boats in 137 additional slips as proposed? Or leakage from two gigantic underground fuel storage tanks':, or from the "state-of-the-art" reverse osmosis system that nobody can assure us will actually work? The interests of the developer are being well protected by his lawyers, his engineers, his feasibility studies. What about the interests of the citizens of New Suffolk, and of the other B.66 -2- communities on Peconic Bay? The Department of Environmental Conservation seems to many of us to conserve only the interests of builders and developers -- ask the residents of Orient, who are trying to preserve Hallocks Bay, with little cooperation from the D.E .C. . I believe that it is up to you, the Planning Board, to save us from this project. It is far too big for New Suffolk, and too big for Peconic Bay in its present unhealthy condition. Please do not cave in to the argument that this project will be "good" for New Suffolk -- consider the size and character of our hamlet, and how this huge facility would overwhelm the village . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i Patsy Roge Member, New Suffolk Civic Association P.S. May I point out, in case nobody else has brought it to your attention, that New Suffolk already has two restaurants. One of them, though considered a 32 star gourmet restaurant by Newsday, is filled to capacity on summer weekends, but cannot scare up enough business to stay open at all between October and May. Whey does anyone think that the proposed restaurant, far larger, will do any better? And if this grand project should get built and then fail, what will we be left with? I personally consider the present "eyesore" better than the one we would then be stuck with) Patsy Rogers PO Box 616 copy to The Suffolk Times New Suffolk, NY 11956 Main Street Greenport, NY 11944 B_67 Lucille Field Goodman 315 Fourth S tre e t New Suffolk, New York 11956 November 12, 1987 Southold Town Planning Committee Southold, New York 1 !� In f' Dear People : darE ' Regarding the restaurant/marina plans for New Suffolk, please allow me to share the following fantasy with you: The New Suffolk of the future : the inhabitants now live with a marina jutting far out into Peconic Bay with fuel stations creating spillage in the already contaminated waters; many boats dumping debris and sewage into the Bay; noise pollution from airconditioning machines, pumps, sewage treatment facilities, traffic, loud music etc. ; cars parked on our streets because parking lot is inadequate or inconvenient; major increase in traffic in and out of village creating fumes, congestion and noise ; the terror of people who drink, and drive unsafely; a restaurant/ catering facility that is entirely too large for this little hamlet overpowering it and eating it alive; a marina anticipating so many boats that it has to exceed the the land grants and consume Peconic Bay; THE TOO BIG RESTAURANT/CATERING CLUB/MARINA FAILING BECAUSE OF ITS GREEDY OVERAMBITION--THE PEOPLE LIVING IN NEW SUFFOLK HAVE LEFT FOR A MORE CIVILIZED, SAFER ENVIRONMENT-- NEW SUFFOLK BECOMES A GHOST TOWN 1 Dear people of the Southold Planning Board, don't let this happen to New Suffolk, its_ children, its elderly, it6 gentle people . Hopefull yours, �> �- - 4 Lucille Field Goodman member, New Suffolk cc: Editor, Suffolk Times Civic Association B.68 i i SOV 1 � L�l GAi s iy C� ` 061f 17 71 x"7 � /S ��,. % li�•��a�-cam... � Gw �—�/z�. &Z4 ,44 y ,a,�" .,two G°o•u Ao. 5ioo 57�^OL Aw . Bim° 7Xae- 64AC .�.� ,�r• • r/�� /IA "7404 a :97 / ..r�c.G� C •� v o . � �...s.•�'.� f' ?�. -�'�-�,.,,. �dl „�.� .��:to-�,.o. T� AOV '.f/aC .�!,A� C�- .;.,� �. • � �. � f� sem' ��.�- U� /jut 4 kc • 8-71 A,�,.� �s0v�. 1,.,4) a ' RECE-'VEJ BY11�o Jue��7 Cry �Ju !,YO07-1_ ►��7 '004 f B.72 i LVUIi.t,lJ i:. 11 11.::..:il,l: 11-15-87 SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD. , 1IOV�E1 •� �` SOUTHOLD, NY. . . I UNDERSTAND FROM RECENT PRESS ARTICLES AND WORD OF MOUTH THAT MR. CARR IS PROPOSING AN ENORMOUS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE NORTH FORK SHIP YARD AREA INVOLVING A LARGE RESTAURANT, MANY DOCKS FOR BOATS AND OTHER FACILITIES. DUE TO THE EXTREME LIMITATIONS ON OUR POTABLE WATER SUPPLY AND OUR NATURAL FACILITY FOR THE DISPOSITION OF WASTE MATERIALS FROM BOATS AND SHORE, I THINK A GREAT DEAL MORE THOUGHT SHOULD BE GIVEN BEFORE THIS PROJECT IS APPROVED. FURTHER, THE ONE AND ONLY ROAD THROUGH THE HEART OF NEW SUFFOLK WILL NEVER HANDLE, APPROPRIATELY, THE LOAD OF TRAFFIC THAT COMES AND GOES EVERY SUMMER. SOONER OR LATER, THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY AND THE WASTE MATERIAL WILL COME TOGETHER BENEATH THE GROUND THEN ALL OF NEW SUFFOLK WILL HAVE A BIG PROBLEM. AS A COMPROMISE, MAY I SUGGEST MR CARR REDUCE THE SIZE OF HIS PROJE TO SAY 1/4 or 1/5TH OF THE ORIGINAL WITH THE PROVISO THAT HE CAN ADD TO THE THING ONCE IT IS ESTABLISHED THAT THE WATER AND WASTE PROBLEMS ARE NOT WITH US . IVE BEEN A RESIDENT FOR THE PAST 27 YEARS AND ENJOY THE AMBIANCE AND EASY GOING ATTITUDE OF OUR TOWN. I WOULD HATE SO TO SEE IT DESTROYED ! THANKS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, SINCERELY, JOHN H.ASHER Sip m NY u B.73 W -- November 12, 1987 Res Carr Application Marina Bay Club New Suffolk Members of the Boards Although I now reside in Cutchogue , I was born in New Suffolk and lived there for 30 years . My family moved to New Suffolk in the late 1800's , and my daughter now lives in the family homestead on Jackson Street. As such, I feel I have the right to be heard regarding this application. Although we all agree that the present shipyard could use a great deal of improvement, I strongly feel that Mr. Carr's project would be a real detriment to the community. New Suffolk 's roads were just not designed with this volume of traffic in mind, and the Bay has already suff3red enough from pollution. I am therefore opposed to this project. Very truly yours , John S. Lawson B.74 .c � - LD v' ® IT, S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 5 , 1987 A A Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. _J ' 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Marina Bay Club Site Plan located at New Suffolk Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed are copies of correspondence from Linda Fletcher for the New Suffolk Civic Association and Robert Tasker, Town Attorney, with regard to the above mentioned proposal. We ask you to please note the Town Attorney' s correspondence with respect to the underwater land purportedly conveyed by the Town Trustees . Mr. Tasker does not believe that any such grants are valid. We also ask that you take this into consideration in the development of the site plan proposal for the Marina Bay Club. If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary ncs . cc: Linda Fletcher B.75 _ lc/P,6 :•.cr, ILS ` UUrc, J• f , r: r CCI+`I ci- Off Via...' I •ice 1 ,•, ' �. r_-, I , �.G t"rC %�Illi .� !- �• .f;i. _ Lj� �_ �� a •�.,0 C�:1' C=c- 6 1�( foil ^.._ �' C r. 1 7 f � .. :C •n L1i' . i ' _'� •- .•I': '• ,�,�r`t):' ? ' •o 1 6 'rrr un, .Y fi z i;l 138 c- lCad C- LY, '=1101 Err S1 r X11 O1k •� r j �:. .t i:r, T.as':eT ► c =Fy �'i' it _ :'c_• i ions 41 e , �: pe. ` i;0 y Or t • t 1 1 i l 01l lel: (�I ��(};','ti' :� 1"I'U:t`:E'��1� 10 196 ROBERT TG'1;N Old ;OU 11101-D TLLLINIGNE Tot,n (S16) 477-1400 425 '`.',IN STRhET • P.O. SOX 697 GREh\1'0RT,L.I.,NDV YORK 11944 June 9 ' , 3 1 36 Ecnnett Orlo,_•,,ski, Jr. , Ch;irnian `'cuthold Town Pl,_i,ning Board n .all :in R,cad il• :.ld, Net•r York 11971 Re: Site Plan of 1.1arina Bay Club y your letter to me of June 3, 1010.6, you have trZns!!litted to me tile -uinents cruinerated therein and req!.,.:: ted my opinion as to %•I-,ether or not M I�naing Ct,:rd must include the nd ccntained :;ithitl the under�:�ter c.--nt and o:Aside the bulkhead line in t'-,e determination of lot at-ea . . .' to the grants, 1 do not believe ti:at any prior purp-orted grants made by Southold Tc•::n Trustees to the .)t•;.vious upland oN.,;-,ers to underwater 1, ds in Cutchocue Harbor and/or Pe-cnic Bay are valid, since the courts of is State, in the Case of To,.-in of Sc•jti:old v. Parks ►{1 ,M1isc. 456; 84 N .Y .S. , 8 UM) ; affi r•r .ed 90 N .Y .S. III z -f l med 1 a3 N .Y . 513, held that the -th h._uneary of the Andross Patent is construed to Le the high water - -k on the north side of Peconic z.nd Gat-diners' Bays. Therefore, the et ::titer lands in said bays Lcleng to :l:e State of Xe:v York, not the ••n of Southold, and only the St-ate r:ay make grants hct o.n. ! ii; !lt of two l ew York cases, to :.it : 2Iccm v__To•..,n of Oster Bay 32 NY � 1973) and t�Sll;ll?ny. Ec.l1••� ! d5 v3 AD 2d 92.3 ;t u 2) , J1C iir'5t Of WhlCil r. .uired that the slop` of an a! ii c:c:l: d sand pit ;nd the second of which r 'uit•t=d that an ocean sznd C!u:1c, a1LhC-.!git s:'c!1 ail :.as may not !.._:IdBble, must be included in deter•r-iining the lot arta. I aril of the opinion - t file land e: braced within file v York Fate ur.�`. =r ..�:t�r grant, and _t ! ! ,Y; ;,.,.�o `:c' . l t t:: !•' -ftlininn -1t ::r.t:,y c;rn,�d by tale ul, al :,. . _ r, _ . _ r .1_ it �t <.t ca. However, the fact that sucil laild is rrlclui:c'_d in (_tit r•w;n;ng lot arta, rot nlcan that such Icrld ist�.:i!%,isle. It ap?ears to fall within the ition of a tical %:etlands undCr S_.ction 97- 13 of th,.2 Ordinance. B.77 >�n �r 1 I 1 - I of tine Tov.,n of Sout!-old. It LIso hrn!-z%bly fr,lis within the State Envii onrnental Cunsurvation Law clefi.iition of tidal wetland and must be considered by the D.E.C . Also, SEctiun 100-119. 2 B (Building setback from water bodies) requires that all !;uildings _hall be _-et I:ack not less than 75 feet from all tidal waters, other ft!Zan I-oily !_land `timid. Yours very truly, l / RG3L'RT IV. TASKER :oa t i I f i I l 1 B. /8 ' !!tt f 4 I4 JOHN C. EGAN STATE OF NEW YORK 1COMM'SS'C" NER EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT JAMES DIRECTOR CHER OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES RCAL PROPERTY PLANNING AND UTILIZATION GROUP MAYOR ERASTUS CORNING IND TOWER JOSEPH F.STELLATO THE GOVERNOR NELSON A ROCKEFELLER EMPIRE STATE PLAZA DIRECTOR OF ALBANY. N Y 12242 DIVISION OF LAND UTILIZATION November 3 , 1986 Mr. Thomas Lowry Box 224 New Suffolk, New York 11956 RE: Ezra Young Grant Dear Mr. Lowry: Thank you for your patience in this matter, as it has taken us a considerable amount of time and effort to research the Ezra Young grant . As you are probably well aware , the Town of Southold was incorporated by patent under Governor Andros on October 30 , 1676 . The Freeholders (inhabitants) were Isaac Arnold, John & Benjamin Young , , Joshiah and Barnabas Horton, Samuel Glover and Isaac Corry. On April 3 , 1838 the Commissioners of the Land Board issued a commerce grant to Ezra Young, Abiel Tuthill, Ira B. Tuthill and Isaac T. Tuthill. This grant contained a reservation providing that the grantee must erect a dock, wharf or fill in the lands for the purpose of commerce . Historically, we believe this was done and can probably be documented . By Chapter 615 of the Laws of 1893 the Legislature passed an act to create a Board of Trustees in the Town of Southold to manage and dispose of the common lands and lands underwater belonging to the Town of Southhold. On November 13 , 1897 the inhabitants (Trustees) of the Town of Southold granted to Jeremiah G. Tuthill and Orin T. Goldsmith an area of 1 313/1000 acres of land underwater, which submerged land grant encompassed the original grant plus some additional lands . The same protective covenants were included in that grant as those in the State grant . 1 Historical and Statistical Gazetter of N.Y.S . , R.P. Smith 1860 . B.79 , It is this writers opinion that the Trustee ' s did not have fee title to the submerged lands and that the grant issued in 1897 is void. The basis for this determination is reflected in the Town of Southold vs Parks 41 Misc 456 ; 84 NYS 1078 and affirmed 90 NYS 1116 : affirmed 183 NY 513 . The Southold case cited above states that the southerly boundary of the Town of Southold is the high water mark on the north side of Peconic and Gardiner Bays following the line of high water mark of Peconic Bay around to Red Creek. Based on this court ' s decision the State of New York had the sovereign right and authority to grant the lands underwater to the upland owner to 1838 . It is our contention that this 1838 grant was a good grant and the fee passed from the State to the upland owner for the purpose of commerce , subject to those inalienable rights , that the State of New York retains in all water grants in its sovereign capacity. It is also assummed that the area in question was improved by the construction of docks and wharfs . To answer your questions concerning commerce as a use , it appears that a change in use from original dock and wharfage use to one of pleasure boat dockage and moorage is consistent . All of this information is subject to litigation and testing in the courts . I hope that this information has clarified your questions concerning the Ezra Young Grant . Nincere], , Alan C. Bauder, P.L.S . Natural Resource Manager cam B.80 We the subscribers do hereby.ded'ioate the following pereela of Land hereinafter described to the use of the people of I the Town of Southold to be used as public highways forever.--. I And the said people of the Torn of Southold and their repre- sentatives are hereby vested with the same authority over the said hereinafter described roads as they now have or may exercise over other Public Highways in said Town.---- The Jutehogue said Streets or Roads are to be three rods wide and not larbor less----Described as follows, viz: The Road or Street culled or Fifth Street commencing at the northwestern extremity of the .iew Suffolk Farm formerly owned by Benjamin Wells, now called New Suffolk And at that place separating from the Public road heretol'ore laid out by said Town of Southold---Thence running Southerly Y through said farm to High water mark, on the margin of Peconic Bay----Also the Road called South Street commencin;; `` on said Fifth Street near the South end thereof and running C ,., Y" thence easterly to high water mark on said Ba Also the Road called Jackson Street commencing on said Fifth Street about three hundred feet to the north of South Street, enc , running thence easterly to High water mark as aforesaid--- _. Also the Road called blain Street commencing on said Fifth " s --� ;i Street about three hundred feet .to the North of Jackson # Street and running thence Easterly tintil it reaches e, point opposite the present site of a Blacksmith Shop owne.4 by the subscribers, situated at the foot or beginning of a wharf erected by the New Suffolk Wharf Co.----Also the Road called King Street commencing on fifth Street afore- ------------ said about three hundred feet to the North of Diain Street, and running thence Easterly to the present place of High water mark aforesaid----Also the Road called Orchard Street commencing on Fifth Street I Z$ a, ' ij`• I ""Y •,1 :i�'L: „' "` y_y'�""~'"'"; L aforesaid about three hundred feet to the North of King Street and running thence easterly to High water mark aforesaid-----Also the Road called Cree}:. Street commencing Greer- on Fifth Street about three hundred feet to the North of ' orchaxld Street and running, thence easterly to High water 4 mark aforesaid----Also the Road called Fourth Street eom- �y S} .` menoing on Orchard Street about tro hundred feet from Fifth Street and thence running parallel to Fifth Street to High water mark aforesaid.---Also the Road called Third Street commencing on Orchard Street about tro ..»•: .' hundred feet to the East of South Street and running thence to High nater mark aforesaid Southerly.---Also ;.• the Road called Second Street commencing,on Orchard Street � r about Two hundred feet to the East of Third Street and running thence Southerly to High water mark aforesaid.- Lad also the Road called First Street commencing on ST St y /+°'`t „° ;• Orchard Street about Two hundred feet to the East of Second Street and running thence Southerly to the place t of High water mark aforesaid-----And we the Subscribers do hereby dedicate the above mentioned and described Roads or Streets to the use of the People of the Toum ! of Southold as aforesaid to be used as Public Highways s. forever. Witness our hands and Seals this Twenty-sixth day of k December Eighteen Hundred and Thirty-seven. III Presence of Ezra Youngs (L. S. ) Silas .`, . Hallock Abiel Tuthill (L. S. ) Ira D. Tuthill(L.S. ) Entd. 8 Jany 1838 Isaac T. Tuthill (L.S. ) Pr. J. Wickham Case Town Clerk. fir;.!�:,;p+ .�•i3;� trs�r B.82 ' ,. II ATTORNEY AT LAW 4a8 MAIN STREET GREtNPORT, NEW YORK 11944 !Ia-477-1400 ` July 29, 1981 Mr. James Arthur Kenniff C/o North Fork Shipyard, Inc. Main Street New Suffolk, New York 11956 Dear Art: I have searched the records in the County Clerk's Office and have located two underwater grants. One was issued by the State of New York on Aril 3. 1$38 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on October 9, 1901 in Liber 510 of deeds at page 373. This grant conveys the land underwater 300 feet out from the then existing ordinary high water mark. The north boundary of the grant is 150 feet north e, ortherly line of Main Street and the south boundary of the grant s 3 0 f et south of the southerly boundary line of Main Street. I have obtaine tified copy of this grant and it is enclosed herewith. Mr. James Arthur Kenniff -2- July 29, 1981 I also located a grant from the Town of Southold granted by the Trustees of the Town of Southold on November 13. 1897 which was recorded in the Suffolk �ounty Clerk's Office on October 9, 1901 in Liber 510 of deeds at page 375. This grant proports to convey a parcel of underwater land 121 feet in length from north to south and extending out into the bay 500 feet. For your informa- tion I am enclosing herewith a copy of the Town grant. As I also previously explained to you, it is doubtful that the Town grant has any validity. The reason for this is that in 1903, the courts held that under the colonial patent the Town of Southold did not acquire any lands under the waters of Southold Bay. This case went to the highest court. Accordingly, any previously issued grants by the trustees of waters In Peconic Bay are void. B.83 fig s �s 5 et� o, It - 31� i ��• s o 0 ry UAAA- aro � B.84 ... YA T ESTABLISHED 1842 FORMERLY GOLDSMITH&TUTHILL BOAT YARD Foot of Main Streets P.O. Box 288 • New Suffolk,New York 11956 • Telephone (516) 734-6060 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. R-F-c"PI. 7D BY Planing BoardSLS t; I �� I Southold Town Offices Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: After speaking to you and the Planing Board on Nov. 9th, with est- imates of the facilities of the marinas in the area, I have spoken with each to find the actual number of docking slips they have. This is an accounting of these Peconic Bay marinas: Peconic River Yacht Basin . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 Larry's Lighthouse Marina . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 Larry's Town Marina at So. Jamesport 120 Great Peconic Bay Marina 250 Strong's Marineland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 Corrigans .. .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Boatmans Harbor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 120 Port of Egypt (slips) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Port of Egypt ( dry storage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 . 0. . . . . . 140 Brewers (formerly Pierce Yacht Basin) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Stirling Harbor . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 1,.U7 This gives an average of 156.7 boats per marina, and brings the Marina Bay Club in below the standard size . It is favorable espec- ially since the Marina Bay Club will be built in open bay waters, not on a river, creek or canal. Regarding traffic, this is one of the few marinas that have two exits leading in different directions . Main Street to New Suffolk Avenue and First Street to Orchard and then north to Cutchogue . Most of the others have only one . Talkinns�with Mr. Tom Corwin, Director of Marketing and Sales for the Pott of Egypt I find and I uote "The national average for vehicles parked in a marina is I per boat" . Tom is a lover of statistics and has kept count at Port of Egypt. "On the busiest day of the year, last year, we had 93 cars parked here" . That is about one car for every three boats, or 1/3rd of a car per boat. Sincerely, e -: illiam T . Ye er YACHT BROKERAGE CHARTER AGENT APPRAISALS DELIVERIES INSTRUCTION B.85 give ' 18 November, 1987 Box 224 New Suffolk, N.Y.11 956 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Gentlemen: This letter is meant to cooberate. and amplify my remarks before the Board at the public hearing ten days ago on the matter of the proposed development of the old North Fork Shipyard here in New Suffolk. First, and perhaps most important, I and many others believe that the proposed marina-restaurant is just too lara for New Suffolk. The developer himself asserts that he expects over 9009C increase in traffic (pp. 1.9-10) , and that in an area that is a cul-de-sac. One of the proposed exits from the development is close to the already-busy public launching ramp as Well as to the parking lot meant for area residents who wish to use the public beach. Certainly that is asking for big-city gridlook. And of course, any overflow from the developers own parking facilities would go first into the present parking lot and then onto our local streets which during the summer months are teeming with children, bicycles, and pedestrians. The landscaping of the development gives additional pause, calling for, as it does, increased elevations for the leaching pools. First Street is invariably flooded after a storm of any consequence, and would most certainly be flooded more severely- and for a longer period of time. Visually, the 27,000 yards of fill would make the development seem like a sort of intruding castle keep, an intrusion into the community rather than a part of it. Finally, the whole question of the appropriation of bay bottom causes me much concern. Your one-time Town Attorney has already ex- pressed himself on the matter of the 1897 Town grant, saying it was not valid. And The New York State Department of State has expressed a similar opinion. One last matter: any DEIS which refers to the view of the bay from the Town launching ramp as "panoramic" (p. 4:40) is so given to overstatement as to be suspect on almost every page. I hope you will give this matter your prayerful consideration. Sincerely yours, Thomad Lowry B.86 pp- ED By w DATE November 16, 1987 Planning Board, Southold Town Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Board Members : We are writing with regard to the Marina Bay Club proposal for New Suffolk, specifically the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as discussed at the public hearing November 9, 1987 . We .want to reinforce our statement of concern for the quality and quantity of our private water supply our home property is the northeast corner of Main and Third Streets . The reverse osmosis system appears to be a very expensive one , and largely untried . How can we be sure our own source (and our neighbors ' ) is pro- tected? Is a further environmental impact study needed? We must look to our local government -- town, county, and state -- to prevent avoidable impairment of our water resources , the fresh water supply of individual homes and the resource of Pe conic Bay as a live habitat. Any change in temperature or salinity of Bay water brought about by the proposed water supply system and/or wastewater treatment system will surely have an impact on the life in the Bay . We are not opposed to having a marina on the properly in question. We respect Mr. Carr's rights and we appre- ciate his efforts to date to accommodate the concerns of New Suffolk residents. However, the size of the enterprise as currently proposed seems enormous . We are apprehensive that Mr. Carr's Marina Bay Club, no matter how good his intentions , may through the sheer size of the operation irretrievably damage our resources and have an ongoing negative impact on the quality of living in New Suffolk. Thank you for hearing us . Sincerely, ri ej Re4ob in, New Suffolk , New York 11956 B.87 I M111 lop 1-9 WN I I 1 11 1 MMMqw"m w 0111.F. ON 0, !1 111.1 1 W 1, R 0 0 44 1 19 1 00.0 0 991 RIM-11 I p wo ........ :7 it 40 MP41 I r N N 6 V IL 1 -47 4 P A it ............. ly;r vi 7 ty- I -7 t 7 e t y y 4( 7- A Ar < RI ,T ty IL y Q L n q) o y III L 7 r, ...... 1111)l 1111111 ul lit ly cy A ty ff T w or- C F� -TL ff KD AVE pe:C-01`4 10 _9u t7 fA" _y L SO 0 L F ZO N V-4 S:-�-L- . ............ 40 crjr CL rejoclt C=��, itr lit 1P_ CL E _f,XZ^ C;1 Ole ti Ui 12 C 2-STY ELDIt Z-14 RT/.- 7- 0% RESTAUR M SUPPO 0 UTILITY 0 14 BERTHI A low- 0 __0 7N. 4 cc 0 0 A-ILI Y-' 1-0 t '4 E;J L - cc Mp. 06 4 0 1 a. C, z N ILL E�'Z AA EZ>'-, 6 Cr U.1 3 F NORTH. ANT 414E C, 0 LINE 9S �R 10, CC- 0 C). cf) C-4 0 < It e2 v`4 Crt xsd f Inger. p -typical) L 0 n R"ANENT SLIRS Tr 3 0 P 4-- rml P O.QT Ne OFFICE -------- -PE-RMANENT/SLIPS _T r ---- -- 7 9 AID e" L M w z ----------�4t> L4 0 W H TOTAL P,h i ti a SP4CM- 177 CA TRANSIENT SLIPS did t Ll + fleeting platform (ty feel) p 4j. PERM AttENT SL I PS Ali t7H L_ T:Z>('-M CH;��ICAL.!D �R7.A let 7 COAT STORAGE V REPAIR iirueum 1 &7.5 SF 4- 1 HOLDING AREA TRAVtL LIFT SLIP F- P CA -TTNE-LINE _NYS -GRANY UTH 1 f 0, N-7 5 ON APR I L 7/ olm N AAi FUELI NQ STATION a SEWAGE PUMPOUT- 6-4 _7' AA vv a OF= F_C0PC> - MAR) /7 CC,/4,7j 10�-j 0� I- Tn /YV Aj(44 -5-r w, c)i s4 1-4 57:�, L. T to Ir -!XLL CO A 17 F= OT AREA.'TOTAL L -4 'A' CRCS '(,'I�b282 tLOW D M A X I k.UM.' L R'T AQVERAGE�A ' 'AREA 00.5 F TOTAL'-BUILDING 'PROVIDED" 7-7 TOTAL PARK ING TOTAL -PAR K IN G .REQUIRED I r -13 X11 F POST PCE a., RETAI L' STORE BOXr STORAGE CA R ERMANENT. -SU PS 10 ?1, SUPS' JBOAT RANSIENT.�80AT '.SI.JP RS A 225 PATRONS7 RE8TAURANT & LOUNGE ONS bUTD'(jOR D0MG 7 5 fk PRIOR' TO TH Is Pkpostd"iift:�:b -VA N T OY L P C D AT 9D A 0 �-'g 1 QV E RA BY AODERICK i4 rs 17 77 L „..- ,_......-.-...... ,.,r -,...--.•,-•P . .. .• - 7, .-. . _ , . , .- _ �,.e - ,. _ - - _ - . . . . f r"i� - - ' •srrsa.•,..•-T _ el ' - � - .. - -,. - - ,. ♦ ,_,_ .. _ .. M. p^N>w �YFtln.Fe�.ax�. lr' x - n{',. -, a _... a.., „_ r..,...... ...r ... .. .. x.. --t.... ,. ., ,r _...... _ ._e.. .. _>s..... .. ........ - ...-. .. w,vv...,..., .,.._ ,� .,,.. -._ _ �. ., .. ._ n .... ,_ _.. -.t .uu-...r._e, „ t,,a„• ..,..,-,.,.-,.....0 m..,, n.,nt.rt wrt..,.»,. n,. ..--e. u. u ..,,., ... x.. .... .,n,.....- , ,.,-.n ., ... r.-. _ ,.e _, .._..- ,,.,. ,..a,•d A ..., _-.R » _•..x'4.,4..-__.Ntu xG_. 'o. .a u , ' „ •. - .v:.MW-, .ILa:+.Wvr Ui'n.a t+r'n,neW 4,..4.6a.'-F'Y.,:Y�G.pP:.r....-„a,.,,. .r.•.:,h... .,r. ..eu',3w,,,a :.`n r-,�,,..anr..-x�eua-.,kAm -_u.✓d”- x».s i✓, xv%5+�• .+. ,.s..w 1 u #. .....wh,w '+.t'a,:x.,,+:�,a-.4-✓,u.,,,n...«_.<. ., •.Y.a..f w.tc 4.w. .,.!_ .,r,.. e+m`+,••,>'.Rv:kdv+.`h�.<:.,,nID•. i.Kw.M1Y.a,' .,.t..Hr.- va-:si�'•'ae•Y".?v,y N+ u 4 um+«x¢•#.s..w•,..u-,y_«,...m....;.Y-M. ., „«,.k». t , _ ' , _ ,.a d•. av_r.✓. ..r,+ -.Sx.:as'x. .,...M.r`1'i'+ww-+.-+ xa vcY ma;l...rtiL, xY.NYs^,a ,..10-..w.,,�-�x,y tS:'.. .1..ss..W.U4._..r..«.c..uyuee�A.i� .,_ � t,�.+ •.�+tix- S a _ httia.`,M,: ... .w_+,- .. r.«. ,. ...o-.. - , r.' -sv- _ f {{ " , _ - .,r._.. _. v - -_, _�y v-.y`._ - -��.i '-R.tY•.wIT.. 1.•��..,'•'• - _ .... e - -/}F .�+�^. 'Apa°wj ,r....xa .-w - - � � � .. � .. i, � 'a. � • : .-.f„.'a✓ ..7�'1'' �`�`al�l�M.._c.�_.a�/V-rTL/....�•. -�.~..,. - - - � � 1 f H41.v✓r[ -. 1:. .4 •)Irvr � - - � ,, _ - ., � A 1 R7 ..O E - i7 i �-�- tom.• i r ,•� ..,' �s �} t .. >c i . , - , 4P, .��:�r,• �,_:� •>. -•r,,.• -rte ,Q.°7 EL e5°ateMiL _ . . . ._ ,.... .. - 1 27 1 .1.. .-, _ ^ „ _ ' i .-. _ •1 _ - 45tDC VC'AtI � s .011 .j - _, . '.tl �°+•�� _ - .7 CF - - i fir,.. � �.G`3 r-w'^ "� � 1 "�`” � 1e,...' f0 f �.f` F = �.�h `t•n'), t - -z �° ��"t 11', .k. .f• ', � � f �' �'.(!7 - � et••�,n.e �_ � , - •N If `L Grp+ _ . . ( G•,<}.07 - -n i '{,' _ ' ' - - `• `4^ < e e ', i - - I iy _ r -011 .Ott S-0 111 , a� �ww.. yy, •O - - ,i i ,- ;N-e.,^', •• • ,:5 ',�"' PRO Tr {I",w 1..✓ - '- - - ;+'�1�L'w.',. /n',t. 1 �_ , i _ � ,rtw .s-4•'aM�. a t'' x�; •n� • _ ..,.r•,��a.- _., `t y`I! 1 II � "'x�"."°' �� f�"^�'�"�'i,�{h�11N+'.,.'u W�t.r!„. � � Ln Ln cn cu " ; -- • - - fn.'Q ,�'fur �_ 1 .i. I �1 o Y•a.�t � � :°�1 TCS I • •p 01� 1�►.I N ra Ca 2 � 1 J .�J Et. 3,'78 f�JG.3.2G• n t,' :. �'-`� a o 15 L iPR r FIN FW:Z, r..t I 0.%0� EL: 6" » 2 B ,• r; I'Ob 4 i O LL i �� Si gyp+ - .. � "��a 1 � p � � ,a °I '; 1 L•'i�al'`i�o'�I N C�1 t�1 f`,n, +, 7• 'M""T � » . x 4: . � , �,, a .�..".,....... ..--�- _Te 9�ro ._..-_..._..L � `'"�--�,f'� ",`.`-„__-,•-._,...,,,..,,,_ ,�V (J' z t t � �� ' � M J � !"7 r+yw�,� pry 1. 'r� �! � i - � �i , .. � et••.. `J�iw.T�,,, "",�'�••"�.`'`°",�,�,.�.�`•`'s�'z.�,yz.a+ta�., �./! ; g; +� �: fit 0 :f f/ t ' .IT L-'•:,', 1 rv^ ..i,.��" 1.� c � {...._.,.�..,.�..•+,...-.- (1 _ _ }} � a .``N+nr -';`">sa-��es.o-=•y,...,,....,,..,,,,,• *Ii E 1 ,,s Cf � a �4 . 4 . o Ii a _ T I `7 �,� �'• q � � - ., ,. 1 ��i-..,,-,n.........-�,-.:w � 1� • L ` ! ! <'<•,.�..-,.,,.,Y� ++w..w,-vy'..� -.�._,.. -,.v..:�,. t � . i I - _At t j"l�r FG�.C{c7 . j ✓ \�� # (� q L.DYJ��, {�C7ft•�'t ©t^ # ��Gt..h+' ," � � t } ( I f� a 11�.,•�.T. ,� 1.•i>r. lv "a,»+ ., ` s t 1 � • t , ■ 1 '� _.�„�'T!� :._ 1. - d A ,� .� �1, �' � +�a• �.....L.., �.`..� b+ �' W y - � tt ( ' r-�--� t ,' F �ldrt i i, •�°• r¢•,�' ,d 1••!'• .OJ 1 Utr�' 60 �J.�Q '� _ ;{ • 1 1 t i t } q 3o ��579� ' � � � { i � t' C....,.-.-.-.r-.•y � t , ' tF l .. I � �, y ,, ,� j �1 s`{ � • � � I I .,�I��A ., } F � ,�*� '.(�• r ` � f � 3 .._._ .'L. �V r.* f 1 4 r�-...-I_--•-; 1 _�.f, ! } � s 4 t ,.-. � 1 ^` � 1 � L„� 3 � 1 -+w::� n�4 � :� r�M1 • + .} 1i i 9 1! i $ .. j r. I r t ` ,. } �' } 1 i a ,'j 1 .A,a I I A•".�J,,� i � .� � e G � NG '•`�"�y >�G.�5c a � , � � f 1 � t'. . ;,F� •��``s� II t1\ t- er:8• -•©�+T1T3t�✓ P'.../I'E"t';-0c2M ! �. k---•^`,;_-�� —�—� ; - - 1 I - •,.�R' - � �, Ll E �_ , _ � - - � ` t ,.+�3_�____J�p;-1--=-,_,.—.�__ --.��-�-��---�'--•--_= ,__ -'•--w---_..._ ,.�.- _` �' 'fir �� , - t -� `°� i - , 1 �.`� _ � � E.-•`-,.-•,•.�..-si tr•,�:..�"•!u0/`'� 1. �',r,ti^' � f'`�'�''' T�•�}•eA �� F I t I - � � � eraP'"w8:aa_ �� I` 6;„. }�.�,c`.� -�• � 1 aC f + ._ -. � ' � t0 Cyt i 1 i i a t✓,�•y i i �Al��= y j i i I 1 t 1 _.r r�•r z•:,�',:, v\ ;/\� i �,st••s_�� .� _ � i � i..... . - � .-I } `j; s Q� it � 1 � t' , -�---•'-_'�"'"""� .-_.. _._,.._._ v, � 4a.Q.� f .-�.Ro,.,:..,...:�'�...,-. .._._ �a y- - j :.�. :� J - 1N'...�Y" Ir1'�,�..... ��El� C� '\ ,! �� II � y I ( � E i 1 a � � t � � � y � ,. � , � � .- i �.. � - ��,fx'• ry -t"Z•r:':af3a`./... ;,-'•"" .S' �� l CJ: ��" r�-..� \ tC31_+="� 1 � yy � � i �. ' i .� ®:fir B ;.� •+ice "�+ _ .. �. 1 1 _ s� �.._,.-_.._ 1 I _ .' •a: . !; '. ��`'�� :�:lE .:�•7E..� � ir•4i..E:- _ ._ N• T _ / � ,r } t � �__._._..,._._. �._-___._..._� � i _� � , -- t }' t'} , 1 � w•..+s,w+wrx...•-'.••.+..-^...^..��-.'..^.`__` �..�. � , ! '� I ' y J�.yf."_ `�J I�al +,� �'i, j F 6 F k ! { } [ :.Y'. � �' { � � .t • � ,� �, f �...•�•-•.•,.• .s .^....._..�...,.-..•.•...�.:...,•-....... .wv<•s.a",+•a,.e+sr+... ,w,.,,__..+.� ..+` __ � �'�`i ,�� `i i` + a � i ' � { I 1 1 { i I 1 �} � 1 E I �( { - � � t� � � ~ i F i ( T �-'_.rcas.•:.a-4�_�.:c':c=.1.. t.�i „ti...._:•,- _ ��"_�c. -"'�-+�q��--:;,-�^_`7/A ,� 1 � I �^�I I i t- ' i 1 ' ? ' i � 1i 1 I i i ! 1 !1d f � I 1 tI:_ ... E � -' z j , tf'..��>� (� �� '� � ,-f s``,�a�'��5-3 C3 �`� �.,�fT•"•`1" �, \� �` _ /��,� i! � � ; I ; � 1 � f � � S a 1 � 1 ' I 1 a tt� •" k r✓ r' I i'� JL / 1co �i�C� �' ��, t�'}rJ f.�itf !�.e}./�Q i�` R'{�� ia i `• r-_ _ ./ r�'✓ ;�f rky f � } ` �(� - TM I ��3 ...., � ` \ � } �� .� `�, ' �t 1 Jt`� f�f'!' `I '1"G q a3� ;� i f''F�UdI l Ei� T1�'�"•'.,. � ' � 3 !� U .a + 1 ,_'sA4.._ z..J� I i---`I-__�_.-�`~��`.-.,,,�._i/�:.,�1....+�i�. _...�_.. � �8r5., ��•..� i 1 � , 3'24 '4•'70 ` 1 t t�''7J z:?a l� 'G, lc71� F:%Cp GC. 1v _ �,Zt'_ �•i ,1�` •...�.-_+-.-.-w..:."`_-._..._� ��- 9 3� �,� i � S � i , ! � � � 1 E p � i � j i � _ r �.,�j "a(- � - s i 1(�.— .._... 1, i 1 � 1 � 1 �' llj t i +1 1 � t !!!1 •[.. �' ' �` i r�� ---•-f-- TI'v�1 C?Q,70 4* "„\ 'f t � y � iiii � ( � � 1 � ' � ' � ., i � - � �� -(yt t 0`1_,�,_t-4.1• � a�nmmn � - �1 B•~,a6,•�,-�.,-�, \.C--' -_.,,.._ y ! I { ' 1 1 �� ( � j � � ti�' , } rr. r:a 3 1 .N�r-a ;.; 1 1 _ _ L__ r1 G P�p,~r r C>R r✓. -- --_ _ ___ ___ _»__ w _. Y . ___ -" I r ! j � � � I ! � .\ee-,'�1-;tr.a, �;'.'°"� �*~,""-tom„ ,� i.=;,ce„�,,,,�-----!_._.. j___•__,...----.--•_J __..+.°1..._._..-.__.......___.,._...._.,.-__.._.._.._...___•_ - __. _ _ � n _ _.._.____~--'--" _� y t� ry�^ "� f' � r � �'} � � A7I •. ,,,�,,,::,�'*;;;t�.�`.F=,''",'�:rw,:�r;;�i--;.,`�° `.� � �`'~•� �-.�. ..r _..__� ---•--•--•`---»�-� �•� �t7C�� :�"t'�UGTJ�,.:�.._. �ITj-•�...�� .�.._. _.___-_-----_.._._—.,_._�.M_�_�__.__. ---,_• _......+.,..�....w-..__--'_______.�..._ .�.._. .____.._.—._._.. � _ ,., �' ti '" �� t2 �t fi.; �+ ,� f/•-'''`�1� +,W' f t 'y '°aµ•:.a�:r -��•...7�..-.>,R''',', �Q ._.� .� _.. .,,. � `r "C ..My 1►.�'c:.�. - f - � 'ir w , � �C► _....,......�^....,._,.�.,...-.. V -+j1'". �G R�>_?N� 6� int�.'�"'F�.,. �»...J C. ;, Gr�,TGt=t ?>1°. ' A`'{ 1 t� 1 ,� �`lj'_� �1t f=.c^ '.: a t€�'•.+:'' � `' -r; `i?�.�° �•! s.,T•l!{, f^. - 10;00 ' qy,rt'-'u" ,.-•,! r p � { V' , { �.._1 L', 7 1 f ,,, jJ _ ✓�--`{*^..,�"..i;:'e'`1ta ! 1� '�� ,� lit .. .. � Irr�..-=-:_, ,. � t Y , t ,..,� { {,� 1 t - x - � �' '","c:r-!><�«•'�;... L.I C'='"T' ::"i;r.i� � � � r-, - 1. r � ' a1 .:��--- •�, , �� l.a� „'�.Tf*.'1-Iar+ �..... raleo��r� t�•E"'�•.s"totl!"JI?� w,c��.t-; . . �'? .��...t ; -j o ►�'_�a r_ � i / � ?.� •�' F > _.-..•_. �,� ,..-,,�„ � --•-_-.trl.. Q,o a-•---•. t�a= ca�:�; ccs N-ro✓+�� r �, , �li+ w'!w. ,�•i1•.i'S/ .v«t a[a,+iQd'a � IINIMRfi's�+M,grta.xtAlil�w�R� -...�f '^.^'-'` "�•.,,4 � � `y � _ 'r• �� ,. , 1 o) < L><P�M I i•.+G Pte%_ vv/ �a�.r� civ=�'�. • _ �T . , , , �� 3aa:� 2•!, TM! 1 ? \_ I N' �� o q ; t' � \ � _ - � '~.;..•>•,o�,� to .� u� i�tr�'T � �0� • LEhG`�lSti�✓ p��i.. W� DIRAiN tN�.1~,T `��_ 1 1W orroM rW � , • � � 1 ':r.. ��" ..K.V�".T►CON AA Tc ' T©°' O CU AJC. au~-,, t�I y - � t � t � Ifi i' - .. 1� 3 00 �.�a;�-�;N c� ��[a:� E�.��✓�'.'T',�r�t . � .. � �C t : QQk ' _.Tt-i t�: ..Di••S.f�tiW 1 Pd�'.� _ Tt� " P.�w;• , dt.�t�: ;ht ,....•...�.�.. G! G;y��iJU/t�dy,.j�"e•�?'tt�.�1°J W+ig'T,,"44t+ H2 M'e5 �t=.a�eS%VJt�ICaM, w • ` �It.. �-©f ,Q� -•,� i. -" _. -� e�"`:� !,, '' _ .. _ � - i ; , ..� t, � �- /"�t✓ .... -'✓ si'f - -. .- .�..._ - _.4 _ - : _ � �f�."".I�"L�'•� Tv ti:+7 •,,Il 1'0�.. F.+l"'�"..7.:7 v/!'�-7�(�.j�1 - �h_«' ! - 1 }� ^, �'1 Ky i a , , - � I I I I ___-- -- r In-.011!lglw P'"y I I 0 I'M F �� _1 I _;__ ___1 - I ,I I� w I � I w I 1_____- 1, III a QVIII , I - __ -�-,*W,-WMN"F, I IOR�,, ,s I __ __1-1_-______---_--_I—-wmii----�� 0" I I I - ,-" -____ _-�__ ..-___ go," ,.1 - --I-----__ _- _ - --,___-_. _ I I I ____ I __ , _____- ,� -,- X � ; I _____ - -1 I -11 � .I ). �1 � F,� I � - - -�---Pq III I - --7--------'� -_ I " : , � , I � -- __,_ --- I� .,_SW%Vi I f-�-� .-- _� . � , I , , . . .. . I. I .. . , I... , 1. I, . I I I � -'.'.)",. _�."I'l ,�-.,.1-- -�,,�,�".,.-- j--I,- -, � , � � , - ." ,� I I . I : . '. I . . � � " , f _w� . --,� , .�I I I �. . -1 ,"� I I I - I, I . -1 , .- ., I . I � .. ; . - .� I � I I 11 . . - 11 r ; . , � I I . . � I . - I 1, I I ., � 1, .1.1 1. -1 " I ; 1. ,., . I � . I � I � ,� 1. �� . � .I .1 I I . . '. .�I , "I . . I I I I I , , , ,I � I , 1, I - .,,j .;,'�,;j,s,-`.'_-r -,I , �(" "," ., I . ,� I I I " . - . I I - � - � �, . �.I . - ,��, . � _4," - . , . : ., T - 1, - �'��" 1, - I�11 ",.`I: I ''.; I. , " --1. I I �, I I , �� -- -, , �� . � . . I ,�,�, �, '.. - , I I � . I . . . � I�_7 ,�� '., _,-,_-, - - �- -, 11-1 I __,��-.71,'�,! �. I , .1 7'.� . � , 11-� � I , !I - t , I � �,_, , 1 �. ., r�1-1.1 �;::,'.'! �__I ", - - I ,- : �.,�, 11;. I , � I - , I 1. .1 I I - �� '. � , I � � �,-- -.e, I -, 1,4 �I', . . 7 , , � I;-I , I I . �.1. I I �.I. ��,�- ;.,-�_^ ,, I �,-� , I I, ;, 11 . I,,*, ,, i'..i , -, , "i, �'j !,, If.' ,,I ,.I�I I I�, '. I .1.. . .1 . ., ��,. __�,,.�, � 4, "�,k, ",I..��,�,11 � I t .1 � - I ,"' ,4 , , I .,:': �. � � , ., I " 4-, I . , .�-..,,, , 11 *is, � , , I -1 . - ,, I.. �', �'." ;,'..�, - ,,,"t,t-1 I � �1��1_, -. , , ,. . : . - -, :,,;,,�".11�I .1, . 1 , i �, � . �.","':%�' � . � ,- ."- - Q�, ,�,_f� I , , .1, � -. �)r - '.. , I I ,. ,�., . . I �� , I �,,.'.. , I.. I . � � , I , . - .,4 -, , %,�r,:, . �,, , ... I .,." .. I I'. �..,:1 I--�I , - , , �:.,-,. , - . ,N,,", .."I,I.1. - , �,...,,' I ,. � I 11. .� ��, " , _; . , ,.� �7 , 1 . I I �, 4 � * , ,,, , 11 - . . . � .. , .. . _-� , _,�': I i A , . � I �I� ",,(,;,:� f,-;t,,.�- - I . .,1.1,- !"'. I 1�-,,�.� .� - � - ! , . � , � , ,� I 11,4 . ,1� . . , ,. , � .'* 't. ',--�,�-� ., I , I .,;�" - , �. . , ; ,, . . �, , , I I , , . I 1. 11 -?_ . . ", ,.*., ,i � i., �, A� . ,-,Z" " _- � .I ,� .ir ,�, I - 41,,w . .I I , * . I . !, � I�: �, � I ,"'�t" , � ", ,/�j, I-" -11 � , -,�_ �-',-1Z;� '. I ,;�,Y,,, , I I � ,. I . e , � - , , ,.,�,. � I,'. , ,. w ..P�. � -1-1k � - - , , - I - �- - .,). I. .... ;, _ hl kl�- � ,!,.,j , , r .� �- "'��,4 ��:, -,.� .�� I 1,�. . � � 11 0- 17- , - ,.'4 .I I . 0 ' � -/ .. -.-r .I - � ,", .. .7r,- . - .;"( �, .I I �. I �; ", , "I.1_., I, i I, , I . :4 il,�t��, .-. _,.� t.11 , , , . ,. , "' 1�:�,. - I I . 0 --, _�, -6 -, - � I q .i 11100 "Is" .-"� -- - "'i I .,I 0 " 0, , , . �I V-.;,x, - . L�� ".� ., 1. � � , , 1�!-._�4 � ,-�,�t,-i,� 1;,-:�'_.�*,",�.��--i' � ; '' - I I � � ,. . � .7 - " � k I, , 1� I . � �, . , . - / I 1;;1* _.,�,T 1 .. 1.� '! -I - - ,�i,.�, g , . " , ., . 1, I. - . ;,,� ;-,- � . 4 .,.',"',.1 I - . , , I � .r . , .� � " . . I ,;,� w, "I i , I I - % , , � .� -� '�!�-'- "- I. I �,",I , ..; � , � , . � " !, * . �, . . . , t:,: , �, I -, "','i �-. -4- - --- , �-`,�: .. I ,, ,,-�:., ." , ,�." , -� '.�,t��,i 1,4 I,*" ,.1;.,,. I " , ,/If 1-11,.A , ,�� - Y�1�, , " ''i"t .,. ,� T�. 1-,�,, . �� - . " . , �� I �,., .� ; " _ . I , , 'I _,, , � ,�_ .,ky., I I - - "1. -,- I � I -1 4 ":,�, �,-,,v,, , �,.,,.\*�ii�.,::�,"-_., -,;, ".---'s ,v',"..-";�; .. I,,�4'.�- 4, , - ,I�'.'� "" " , � . I0 . � I, � _*T * j I I ".r.,,�.": I.1 j. . .�- , -,, � . $" � �� , I .I,,. , ,� & I ,. ." -, . . , .� I , , ..". �, , ._; ,� I - �, �� - - � . " � ,� . I;*- - .1 "", � I �,, I ., " ! .1 �_ � .,I'- - I -1 , , �ve, " % � I "A �,.... . .1 , - � � I , I , . ,I., ., �� I � I r %'� � ,�O. � . - ,- - _ I� , , 11 -, , .� , . . . I 'I � , . I � . I " � , .- -, I" , . , :: � , I �: I ,,, I , 1, ,- " "'", '' I ,I% I-.� ., I ...,I , jl��,� t' ,� I ,�, � -91 1, I .. ,A. t� , ,4 , �'. *7 :7�.:_ - " �'It - I ( j I "', �"-i; :. . , . � J .'. - �, t , 'I,'! ;', "; ,f I I 1.11�11�1 �� , "�,�, ,� ? I- , .1 , I :I -, ,�� -; , ,. 11 I" .I. - .7 .. , � A . ",,� - _-�%;'�,:,,, ` I � I .1 ��I." --.I kx- � �. � . 1. I � I ,s., , 1�.,�., !�!,� k , ,�, "I I�,I .:�, , ,� . I I I I I . , , ,I, I 11� � ��. 4",�,*�'r ,�,?,�� I I � ��' ,,, . ., ,� , " -- - -Y, ,, � � � . I . I , I I , , . I I I 1, ,.� . , , A --,," .I - 4 0-. I I. I , �. I I I . -, , , . t - " � . I � I ;�,;�"- , --,,,;�_ ,� I. � I ,� ',� �I,� ," I� . #1 � _, � . �'I � :,*�c I, .A .. � -I . : , � � - , , 1.4 1, I , , , � ,� , , > ... �". - � . ., , t ,-- -� -I. , I � . ,: � �� --:" * . � r ,� , 1, I � - 1, I,0 1 1 -I I- I I mip 9 0 �.M.-I I I ----- ;i " , �','Ili .,.:��;" ( I , -. _�i,,� , - '4 ... �� I ---W"--, I_...,I �. ,��"',o,,�� (, ,��,,-��-,' �41 " "; I : " - . . I . . - I - I - I -I � I I . 0 ,, I .I-1 .1 . �I I � I .I . , - �' , ,;.;4, i:, 1(_ " � I .1 I ----.-- - ,. ,el , � _ I - ,- -ii,_� i � � � � I � I �- ii� I,i. � , . , , , I , , . .z - " .,- !I P, I vy�!..�-0� ,c . i .; �,`_l �. . , -, . .-, - - ,:' _-jl� �j .� I -,a- , ;i , ,, i''.. ii;.L--.� - �,:, 4 .* j':� ,4 4 ��,'I. q-T �,- ; . �,,. I"I' �, �.I ., " . -I .�, I�� . � -�;'.��,�, I I v , ..4;, - ,- ",.,�. , � . , -, .. �, I - 0 - t I "'�� I ,� �,". , � . - " 11 I ,�, ;� , I . ,�, , ; A I. I 0,004.044 P �= - 11, .,I ., , I, ig - ._', 1�, - , � I, , , I . I I N .1 I - ��:,'1 -4, � . ; I . - ^ I I - � . I � .".."....w ._T,.s..,b,%.sss*."�� I- I � � I , ,,.'� 4 * I� I . I � I-I.I I I � � , . - ___ � ___�,___- I ..-.--.- -11�_-`---1--11 ---" -, - - � ---_ - _ - _._._____� --�__. -111,�I � . �, - . I � -$-j__.-, ', - . I .� . _. "__ , , , � . - � .1 : � . . � � - �. - I.., . . , ':� I-" _. , . - , � - .... - .- ." . .1� 11-11 1. --� � � 1----1..'�. .� �, --, - �, ...", T- -1.1..-..-_-___..1- .- .,-,-1- _-_�_-1__-____1 I'I - I I �: �:* � I ;, �1, , � I � " , , - , �1, _� I, I 7 . � - - '. , � .. . I I � . -.11-�j.--I--.----_---,---- I__--I_______.., I_�1.I11__________ ..---r....__.___�_----.,_ . I "'t,* . - I"�.. ��I.,-. --�'�. I,, "�-,I, ,,:, I, . , :' It I . ." , ",:. .. I . - � ,� . . .. I . � " - .� ,r. , I � . _._'1-_- _ _-,"" . - . " I�_ � �_., I t, v - ,,, : , , :, , , - . 'i . %. ., I . . I � 11.,- . . I/ . . �--,- . , I I � _ - 11 i, , ; -, ��' ,, ". . , , .,, ,I " . -4. 1 . � i - - � k -1. ), . , , . I , - . I. . � . - -__�_, - ---__-_-:-_ .___-1__'_---. I - 11, ,,, I , I 11 " . 4 " I '.. I , , ,1, . ,��- -4 � I , . . Z_�� I I 1.4, .7- ,_ �, I , , . I , , , I ,� I 1. � I . . I I � I .. . - .. , 1, V� 1�, , � ,�'� _." '.1 I-,.,!-0,,�,I� ",%, I . r!I,":,,""..":, � I � I , � I � ., � I 'I, I , I I, . I_1� (�, I, �'. _. I I _., 1. I - -1 --- _,..- � , ., , , - , . . 1. . I . � I I . I I . . , , ... %I. . . I � ,�" � I ?*.,)I- ,I "I V-,I � .f��-,j�i, :. ( �, - - .� `%� . � I �� . �" ,,, !,I�*�-,% - , I 1 '. �- �. -i.;,�__ I I . . I I . . , � �' .,;�.", I . -f 11". �I -, . , I *, , � -'.i, : � -,�", ,-�- � I-I,---*, -, - f . - . I . --__�- , 11 . . ! - , � .. , I �o 11 * " �. ' I I, .t-I ,/,, ,4 , "X ,,�,,-�, ., , , ,:, , : . � I , e ) I � . . - I , , . " 0,, - I �-�'�, � , I I .� J�,:� . ''!� 1.11 ,I, ". , �- ," ,, I -'I,,--- _-I , " , .�',, * i � ,./ " 1, w � I I - .. , - . � i ." , , ........I., �I , �.I- . I - . . ., . q �4'. , , It (,, "71 � '. .;I� �, .1 . - -�", 1,,, , , , , t .. . ,�- , .. � "' � 1�1' *-�." -. , ,,,,'I - , ,� _ ,,* , I . I . ,�,�','�;,,,, , I�". I� t 4'. , ,I ", . .'-I ", , .,. 1 $ � .� . I . . I . . . -, , - I ,, u � I . t- �) 0 6 �) , . , ,, , , ,� I ,",�, � - �, ,� I . t I I I � I . � :� . . ,--I � .� . � I I I I . I . t . ..: ._ � , �,� .(j _ � .I I I " '., ?,� I�11 ,,I.�1'11�I -,1) I,#"I � -- :, :�"I e 1. � I .. I - . - 11.--_ . . I I - . I I I . I _� . I I . " "'' 4., 1; I I I .�',, -, M!MH __ �, � .;.1. : '. I I.- I I .1 I " . I .11 -1, I . I . , � . I . ...- '. . I I - I � . ,I ---oph . - " f��.. ��, ,� I 1_� . - " , ,,,�� , 11 , . - I . , . ` , , ,, v-1 � I I . � � ,"1, , �,; , , I I"�I I . �'. ,�J,11'1�.�. I 1,�11 I I ,',._- . � � I I . � -I 114 .� li- I �ff- �)ul - - ,� �,� - ,�" I ,,',� p.!, '�" " . ,.� _ , I I - � I - . I .I , � . I I KI Id , I I ".� " ,�,,1 I S , -,- ... I , ..",, , �,:,%C.": -I ,I i 11� I I I . I I % � 1' - ,--' . I . . I . . 1. � % �, .; I , I I . ,� I I % " .'� - ,I I�,. - .� I , "t" T, , I , " I I I ,I " � I I � . . I � , , 4 1 �I .'; I,,I, . ,1_- , I I , I ,� I 1* , I , I I , " * 6 % D_ft i � :, , ,*, � t , , , 1'� , .� ,-, , . . 14 . I 1, � � .- ( .I . - I I , �, .. .," , � �J. � , �"', � '!e,4, , , , . I , , I, I I - I . . I . . � I . \ 11 . I I� __ . --% � � , , - > -1 d ,� , I; I � �I , I . ----I '.1 . . I :, I I . I , , ,I , -1, � . I . � , - � - 9 - , #!n� I _,�-,� . I �. - I , " ,, 11 r ( ", �� I, � -,�,� - , . - ",, .,_�- ---,,,:,.",i , 1, �i!- �, :, ,-,_�-� , ,,. - , ji� . --,W' . e I � ,I- . , ,� . I _/__1 I . I . � I I ,1,... f; ,-r , " ,,, ,-,� - ,� , I., �:. . _.. ,4. � . , ., . . I 1 ^ , , � I I� " I . . . I . �, , I . � I I � I ? � �� (f I 10 q) I .:�'� I I I I. - i �` ,,I, �'�, :_ : , I F I I I ..1-1. I 1:�*A � .11� ,: . ..., � f - - 1, kq I I- 11)III 41 P III - 4 1 11.",,� !, :N- - . 11 1��:' , �,".,� �. I, .. �' I . , I , , - I . , - - � � . � z � .,*. ,� \ � , � , . ��. . . � I . . I I I . I 1, ,� I � � I I . . I I . . . - �1 " - ,; ,* 46 - y 1 �N N I - vr___,_� �t ,� �, , , � I � ) I . , _., , . �, .. j 1'. I I � _, I . i o - . .- , � _i . ------1___111 I . ( . , . . ul :!"." F=1.1� . - I"?, �, -, - ,1 j ,, ,'I''-j- , , ,-I�"; . I I I - -� . I I I 11 , f. ��3, �� , � , .�� I _ I , , I! . , I I . I � . ,�4, .. t I . .pir" � I : , 2"'". -'i. , " , , * , I , k� .- - � . - ., , . , . . I d T ,F -Z � t 11 *I .I� I , .. . �". , I ..; I . I . . 4 - � I 4 N - � ,I . ', I I I . ,e 1. I I I I I I,(I 00 k� - $ _,i I, I -I- i Ii 1. �. . " 't� �.,� f j , . � I - j, '. \ - , � . . _1 I I " ; t '! , 4i ( 4% ( 111 I ;1 I ,�' .I � 1, � - � . $0 . � I " '. ) . . - ,� : 61 P �- i1i � .I I � , v t- a ; " ,-,,.,',I, � �' I� ";,I tA, ,,,, ,11.,, '. , I*I I t I . 1 I . I j . -_, � i,,I I I --1, 1,11 rL %� �q 7 �--i", r f"'i .f,_I . _. I ..,-, 1 ,� � I I '. � . J '! � , , ." , - " � � I ,;I . I v � -1 I .` ,.Ie _. i 0 Z -Z 'j I- v . � 0�' . . . 1, . , ., "! �,I I I , " .I 5 ;sl.�,_, i . I.- 1� ,." �, i ,� .: .� . -," " iI __� � I III, - " " - -1 --, . I ,I . . 1. I . I � .; . - 0 , - _e 11- - I 11. , , , i'- � I f-) I., .. - " , ir � . ,___,�, -.4t_� . " � . �, � . ./ . 17, - 0 17; f) � � ,� , ! . ... � .1'. , , . 4 , , . t - . " - . ,i J� v I 0 - �.d � ,I �ii��:,I' 'j�!",I I!� ,� ,. , , , 11 , � , . I, -, 4 1 - . I V ? III §�- I - I , , , , ,, �I ,%Z � I ! . � . , I I- . I . . _ I I '.ff ,( - A X j II) I - . � I I I .,t , � -I I��, ,: .1;., � , " � ,. , - . ,I,, I . . � .I I .� . � - . . I 1� 0 ,- �w � I I ty - . -A . f 7 1 �,� t � .1 � , . , ,, I f . I . I . I A . I .I � if 4� ,, III I .� 1 -"if . � 1.?I,,,�', ,,.� ,�._ .�, ,., I - . - - 4' � / - . .- I 1�- 1,- � I )( v -1 U) at [( I'— 1, 1, I , , , , I I � I . � � . . . . I I v . I " .- �__ � . " I I - ; I I k " I 11 ��' : .v% f� ,�, : , � � I- . . 1--i I I . I f,,,, -,I .,�� `" � . � � . .01 . . - . " -.-.---___� ..I I I . . �'� " , 0� ;, -7'.," _rl , . ,� . , - ,, I - I . I �I . '. I I I � I- -.. - - - . C2 . - , -_a � a ( 4 0 V -1 I "."I". .1 I,' ! I, , 1. ��, , , . - - - I .1 " ,. , , - , -.1 , � � . I.. '! ;. ,_ _.� . ,A_ 1 --- �. ,,- , I - I . - . ; , --, .� 'a ,� � I" !,:, , , I I��'. - -- I . N I I I � . 0 - 6� a: I- D lb 11) ; ir ,,, �: '*- ` I � , ,I,, , ,it, III, j ��".,''�" , I ,� , . � �R � ur � - r , . , I - . I � i i V 1�1 I � fil - q < 4 .�_,. �� , , , I (Y x < � I , I , , I,,Of., - .�: I .I i , . - - - r .__" � - . I � * . � - I) / 0 - -�� - .",.* �-" - I� I. . . , , I � _ � , � �, ': '. .I � " I I . ..- I � L\ - - � I ,_C - ,,,_� ,V i i� ,., I ..11 I I,I " �,,.�/ I � ., � r. - .- -,% .:1 , I -/ I -w I f I,, � . / ,� . 1 6 0 . I k�Ct 6 �, < > ,x I ") K I t- < -t > -f j, 2149"� . 4 P", ,.. � . . 1`1 I .).- I - ,;I,� , I: : _,� � , :�: ----- 1-1 . � - � - � I . . . I . .. . I I 1% I �0 - - - I tb - , _4_ , I �� . I I-�A.�_,�.,, , �, wl�...'.. � I -4'j['I I , , I . I - . - 4 . 11) , t� ,.I I . � . .1, I i I . .y - I , . . . - - %) (A III -3. - -Z- -_ , . ,i .11 I I I h-P- I\1 ."., , �. , ., , I . .._ I . , q� 06 - - "Ii(( , , I _-,*.---, :_I� '..��, , 13 j a . .e,�.'1! _.. 4", I � . .,,�. '� , c", I - I *, '. , - I -'4�,'.,�, 1 16 I-^r,,0 � "'RI (� � .�. "..- � _. I I III"" � 1 7 �- I . ':, , -;� I. . � . � 1, - - - --_. � - . , �III ]e 6 i . -,I I r I - - I , I .1,I I I . . . . . I - . I - # .1 - .. . I i k1l I ki -1 C) 4):?v - n . . 1� .. .."( . . F-/ _'. 11 I � , , � I � I � I .1 I I I .. . I - 4 .t�,,�., - I . 1. I I y 17, F K� B � I 1. - '.I!� ,1, , '. I, .. _� , ,� .�,:_%, . , . , I I I - . I _I� I I I "� 1, , � �, . , I . I I-(::)N 6 . ,:-, �-.,,'I . - - � I. . . t �_ 11 : _�. , �, .� . " I ! � If PI , I *1, I I .I - I .N 1. * I .1 I .---,%- � - I � - : , ,, ��, "., ,4", , , . ,4 , (11- _1 I , I 11 N . I I ...III I - - - 1. , 61 , .1 11 0, � 4( ty v " " -"�� - �.' , � . __\ - I, 11"I I in I ( �5 I i A.� . .1c . I- u � - (�,R �_4 � I n- � � : . , I I, �. - , . I I , : - _ " v 6 ," . 1� - ` '! )",*. . 11 � .� � - - - � . . � . . � , � . ,� � 11 . .1)�11` �o 1. - " , , . I I ff , ,, ,,__ . f . . ,,, ..- .- I I 11 �. -. � .. ,I I'- u � - ., _v �.. . I, ,I � I I I � , I . L�, z ,I' , , . - I � -I . . C� � '.. I I-,% -" �,��'.�.!.:I - , . �, �! t- n o ,, .: ; I . - I - ,� , j ,4- ,j , � " , I 1 4 o.I ,I I . 4 1 I . _- uq 8 � .y , � . I ,I � I ��I .. I I III%..' , , 'I, f ",I � 1. "I .11 - , I I - I -11 I -- .i . � ( I R f . . I �� . I. �, . I I , .I . , .1 I * I I I -`Ii- � , I . - . . �. � . [-\P Iq P,, " : 1�:,. � ,��,�,,'! � I" I'- '.* . ,-, I � , �q) B q o� 1) j . ., I � ., I .� .. . : . .. , - -4) _ , f! , 6 R v I WDI 0 III 11 ",- s-, '! It t I --,, .: �, , " !,., , , i - , ,� I � --- . .� . - . . - ---. . I - . . . I . . � � I 1 4 ul IU iI;i I I '.�.*�.!r-�',"�, 0% . ,, , .. I _ ; .1 . I ; , . I � I I [11 q)4) I "�,":,'j:.-� , , I.� ,:, ,,, ,I :I , I I I ..1. . . I � " > I) -,.,� : * , "-I - 11 � .. � I . / o .1 . , - , �� I I , � �- ,1. !1 - I , -1 ; u) �0�u;)k�,-j j�j�, I I :, , ."sA% , I t- ,":10 � , : I.I` . ,,, I . I I . i I . . _ - - � . .1 I � I �,w H) � i _� � , % I�,, _" � w ) 'p,,, ".,`:,-,, ` � 4.. .1's", ,,, ( --------.- ''....,....... ;�� 5: 5 5 - 5: 5; `:1i 90 u-;I 11-1,�;,a�.5i.� � ( 1 � - I I .. , , , , � I I I , . � . -.-- _.- -___-_ _-- 11--__ - -1 � ______11...... 1111111�......� 1� - �- -1-___ - ! �� ct v_V< vi ly C(T re ry. d ; ",� ,I" . I . , � � I - 11 -, . . � . � I , I . . � � . I . -11 . � � ! r." ". '. I � . 11 -_ I I 01 . � I I � I.......lf,j,_ , I � # I I .1 ".0. . :",.,�",'� I I q .. I . I .f , � . , . . . , � . � . '!, 171 I I I (_� -- I - I-(-,,, - 6 . I I 1� ,� - ",� . I - 1� , -,� � w(Y.v I , ,� � I� . .- I A - ,:I � 41 1)0 0, �Icl I R ,q, 1q) [)ig - , �. 1 4 , . I I 1� I I - ___ - 11 - - ., 1%.--, 0 � 1), 10 - : . � ,� ,'.,,,�.��( 11 , '.,,� I, "-, � � , - . . � 'A(J) q I 11-1 , I . . ,� I : _ . � i . ,,.,_ : , , �, I " I.. - - I _ 1 I I � -_ - 1. I, p.4" , I . I �,__ I , - - I , ( 1, . I I . . . '. . I . I., \ .- - I 6 I . -_ �J, I... ''I, I .6 - I I . - . . I I I I " . w , . I , I - . ,4 IV, I , I "- -4- '- 1q.,4 I � � I � . I " 0 * - � 1� , , :�. I _�--,-_ . � - . -- - ". L.I T71-I- '2 t-,D r-av'? \3 ii��K)'T `4 I'D 4 -� � - �� : � - .1, - I �1�'. , , * . , . I I �. . I . : _.. . . � .53 - . � !,�, 1.%- . .1 . I ) -C� _Z(j) 4'�It) I I I I " I r, , r. , � � . . - . IT 40 In - 11I I I ...5� , 1.�, , I . ,-4. 1 :1 . � w . . - . . . a , . ^Vrz,. � 1 -L PIZ:C-4::)f4 I(f, - I 1'_' . -(( - _k vo __ _ I � T I I� , _��- � . I, , - I - 1). I � I ,,� .0. I .1 I . . . - TO" ,I-"')v-0 1 1 '4�, � . ,� /"N . , , �,-;�- �, q It A" . M-c . '! I, , , � ..,\ " f ., . I -__*__�_L_-.1.,.._.'*i .. ,-. - . .di . -.. , -- . . .. 1�'^"( . : I - - " - �, ----4- 7:1-t-- �d) ,f�T- I I I,�L,I i IL�,-�� ""I. ., , 11 I "'T_, I . - . I. f, . . . . . . . I . I . *.-"- .1111, . - -- . -_,, ii� - -_ It � �I . (0:." . i , . ; . . I ; `� - , . -_- . - I --.:;f- __,_ - :;6� : i. _,'It 0 `4 1 %.." '. , , ,. - , I.- � ,4 , I � . - -- . I . _ . . I ! - - - __w -_" i , _ -.&&M;L,- -M - ,-- , .� Z:-U) 4-=- t- -N-= - I�r; 'I) , �, ,&, I, !I , '7 * , ` I I . ' I ,I I � . 11 .�'. � I I. . I - I . ,- . _ �, I . .1 . . . - �� M kj j_!- I I I - .1 �, . . "Ift I - � " " . , - -. � I . . 1. . -1,11 I �t" ) I ,� � 'a), , . I I -,- I I .1 -11 I I . I, - , I -I- . . . : I cb :. .1 a) � I . . I i , I R -- -- -- .::7 4�- " I , � - --.- � :. , �t; T��It;i� �4 - 6 I : " .� " ." . 1, :, . � I . - I I - a ; , , 1 . . � III. ---.-'- - . I I - i .. -- IF Iq j��INI, - 1. I , ., � ? - . . .. I � ;;' , J� � 1 ,,, . 4 � " " - � .. . ,. a I I , � � . _,- - � . . 4 .. � I I _ � � . " �(f , . ,.4 , ��'r�_. �.., . I j :.. . I I I -_ " e i 1 1 1 1 1 D . C : , , .,� . . I ., I � . - � I 1 1 1 , . -,LL__ .1 - I . � - .1 . I . , I . .. . I . . _%w - I , Ill . . 'L I ; ,�I , . I � . . K MAT I . . I . , I C, I ;, .. i : I . � . . I � . I -- . G - to " � -.04-01' . - iI I . - . . .� I . � .. . . � . . . . . . . I - . . . I I I . C f - I 1, "'! )\ � I -.� I - � - . _ - rr:CC,r4 I<- . I ____ __�_ - I . . I . .. ,� - , . A I .� . . so, !I I , �-1, " I . . - I . IE>^-Y I - � I -- I 1b M .2 f , 11 . -,--,, , . I . I . . I I !I� 11 - � - , : I I ,,"'. I ", , I - , " -, . . - . �1.1�� I L . "I " 11 I I . . -, � -AD �. 1. I . I I � , � � 'M - I ,". I -,.�,A . I I . � - . � . A%,jafzHr . 0,FW"-%E -L R--r, I _Qt) I 1 I. .1 , I , , I I � - . I . V ,;, , � I I NO 11 I, � : I . I . I - �--- . . -1 I �� I - mmumm I � I . -_ � V 17 I ; , .. I� .., . .I . I . I . I , I I . - - L1,M), I L -_ -_ __ t . I � 4" - . I I -, . , I , fN_J . ; I : - � I, I . I I . I . . - I . : ��j j , a . r! . .I r ,�1,.!, . I I— ,i" , .IT . . . _% ; I . . : . 0 � � 11 , � , 'r, , _ � k I \ . I -a ., -1 I ., . 111 f -%,W- I W - I I . . I I � I I . I . .:- . I 1.0 �.y t. .� � f I I - - - � . , I . . :_ . � - "I", , ,_ �-- I . 1. , - I .1 I . I . . I - . I I � - -� L . � � I- --MAI, I' I I.- - . � . I - I "o r � - __ � I . �, I % - .I , � , �� . I � 1. . I . . � . . I . _ . I` . . . - � . . - . , I I A i . . ... I � . I I I I I I � I I I .- I I I . - . - I I I , � - - ,- I - - -*. . , � I C4- �".. , I . I I . . . . . . - -4-1 . . i I � I 1, . I I ".- . � . . I . . . t - , T, %in ,� � � . . . . . I . . . . . I � -, ,. I 1, I � " - �, - I __�-- � I i kkP , ,.- in . ; _-�^ I - , �� ; . . L' . � . . . .- � . i __ . _ . ! . � . I J.I A '�� ,',,- . . % I � . . ___� I � ,q'i . - , I ..11. . ( ,--. . � � � -1 . - , I I , � �". I 11 � -1 - I . I- . � , � �.'. I I 41; .a; � . � . I , .-- i. _ ,:I I � , . -it, I . � " . . I I ..\, . I I v: I I I! ; . . " . . q . " --- --,, I . i . � . ,, � -, I �� ..�_,--- ..N-' � . - . . . � - . . , . . I .1 �, ,� _�*- � _.. ., I I �. � . . - - � � . '. - � . . 1: � . , . I 'r,� 1 . . - - . . . . . - - - . - . . I z -.. I � ,.; . I � __ -.-- I I. . - I , I - . . I � ,�,0,I t . . I I I I I I � �" �I . . I . I . - � - .1 I : " .. - I I . , . I . . . I j . !.- . !__ I . . . ., � . . . . I I � . � S-ississi I - (n . -- * 11 I I . . � I � - . - . � . . .i - � .� . . . I � - I i I I 1. I � . . . . .. . 1 I. - . I . . I . . . r I I - . I .I I . � I I -f- I I � . 'I 1"M * . -0 , . . � I I ! I � __. . m � .� '.-,F . r I- �, . I I *1 . � I ' 0 .. . I I . 0 � , .-I" I I � I I .. I I I . . I . . ., 'L 11 � . I � . - I I � _. . . KERIG STREM IL , I I . . . I � � (, ; , 11111.1, 1, I . 4 . . . - ! � I �J�� - . . I I I . .� �11� - . - . .. . . . . . ('5� .011 ,�,jc;)S ) f I .. . I I . I . . � _ 1 . . . - - . � I Alk � I - I - I I . I . ., I I - � . I % . . . r il _ _ ; CL . r, ; 1 . i I 7 K . I . - . .. . I . -. . . . . W" S � I r : _ I i . . I " , . ;r ; � 11 _. - - f. . . '. --?� -pz5r- -_>1-.A.,3C-'iz:, L_CL:;,-,-r<>� . t. . . . I I'll . I I . I . I I L ! � r--\/= S I _,� . I % . I )` not6ow... V 4 I , 11 . . . . . . -rH,i-w,qvGi-, -,x,o,, t-i6F,i=),Kj-r/ 4- ks:,-, . I .. , = , t_. - _ , 41.1� , I . I . . . . - ___ i � i :, - . � I � . � IF . I. . .� . - 1110 . - I - . I .1 III I --C-P - �, I I , _-'siss, � � ,., . I ,-E�4 P_7j CZ I_�-5[:;l ,A,PC>5-7.0 K I AA.A1,-r= , I . i I '. . . I � . : .� . .I � - I . � � � -- - , L-Y . I � I o I ; I . III` �� . I I.": � .. .� . . I I . I N1 . L - ____� Co' -t7E IC)'�N 7HE P_;7,1-,'Y k�,07`1�0N%I . . � . I I I I I Z- lu I � � � I � .1, . I f . . R L-=-F=-r -f-_VRN- .,� I ...- - . I -- I . . ,ip I I . . I . . . . _ _ # . �j I . . . # . - - -1 � . . � , 4 I _#� � 11 I. - . . I . . I . I 0NL.,;II,I '91s.1-4 1 .1, . I .- . I I . 1I`_ ! -, , 10 , , �, i.,. I I � � � I � I - - . - kj "01": , . I 11' -- 4) ,, . I . I i i : . - , - �I I � I - - I - -t ", A I I I ! ,,- , , I I . ; � . � L . ,_� `1 I I : , ." ! I . . - . M .ft________1 , - �_ 'I , I __ . '. ) 1 &140,- --w . I., ,; , ! J, I . I . L(")rz I P., , I . I . . . - It , I I .: . . I - .- . . . . . - -T-_ * . . __ I, I� I / . . . I . I . I . � 4 t "M 1 4 I , 4 � '111 " I . . 11" , I I . I I . � . , 00 :t�"3 S,C>2 IT I 0 ,E I I I `;S - .4, , OL��, �,�q-f ",G'�-k vviiii m-A's, � f - . d - I . _--,_ 0 _ ; I M 4 1 � I "I - . I � . () � I- . . � � .I\_1 . .1 - , 71171'p 1-11- _______- ---�---- 0 - �� . I I � '. I , 11 I I I I 77, _-t�' -x-v_,-- _______L ��-- . � I I � . I I. � 'V�---___ - I 02 - - 1". _ r " ; P 1�44%., 4 � . . I � I . . - *1�1 �J , I , � - �\, f I I', '" - re/occIt9d ,ip . - J .. I " - I I . .. I i.-INI- - . I . I I,� , *. - I . r . - I I _1�)T I ON�_7 Gkz- -- -14 , - W4�(�."- - 2 Gq. . -0 A � Y� .1 . � �, . I� , N 0� - �-'- .-�--- _t - .� .1 - I I . I I I - - -, i . , %k , �-_'! -___ - . - .� - '1,ky� e #I C=)// . . 31,11421 � . . . - . . 0. I r " __%. to. I I , �,,I .1 . 1 _ - , .- . . � I . 0,/-- __ --- -- --_-, -, ! �, if __ J_ _(.1k, - _ I ----. . __ - - , N % I d rip : , , . " I . . . I . . -IM --- % ' � - _� --- - . . - I I . I CA ,_. " � , ,. ;1. I . . I - . � - IT ri . , vA i . it 'Wi it"Q,�"-�-��,-, - ----I--- - � .--. I . I . - -, ---- � . . [--*! Q. . � 11 4 - . I I t�, ; I I _:" . . . - A I I (5 Iiiiir),�, - . I I ? , � -1 I ,I . I I - I . I- _'T,-- - 9 I I - . vA - -- - --;,2: It, X C - - � - - . x I I I � - �: I . - I CL I - � I . r .1 -;d,I - -- I - I I 111;11;�r.1 I - � I . - . - � ,,,1% I I � I I I IT-I_ . � - . I . - I f 11 . , � I I- .- , I w . � I � . I ,%k 1 '51 - 1.� '. , - ..., I � r' % ----__ - - '10 , . ---1`---o- - . i- ! 11 .11 , I . ��. - -.1 .. It*%-; . . . . . III : � � . I - t .-- , �, I ill L.;I ., , 0 C) 61), I 1�.. I � �i._, I . . __ I � .1 . I A * _% i S_ _C� - - / . I il I ---- ___-______"!I_____________ �, = I: � . . I � ; ; III 10 - - =t'�-q-MR^,-,�,:_- PNC I , . � - . I 1111t%�o I . \� -� I � .' � -' ,- . J� L : . . � . ! I I - .Z%I, , r w ( ,� - I-- ,- I I ,,:I .. 1! \ . T'Itl' . I I - , - . i I ; 1, . . I __ - � tlw�p - _ I , . � .I \ 11 - . � I I - . --� _- "J,�.-.f_� 01 I . ., . . I , I Cl' " . . . I I .. I . 1�.il ," : . I . . I� , F-1-4,FI-K r-1-1(0. i I I . J, �----------- ______ I - , I .I _`__ , --(:5iIo Eiir�r,::) �, � I - � . I ! III� 4 ., -- Cn t_ - C) - . I - I . I . ,--- . 1i . . . _:" - -� - , I., , I I I , - : I I . . " I I . .. ._� I . . - - - . , , 2-STY BLDIt-I _.. - - " . "111i , V, - , ... ;, - . I . --11, . - - � . � 1� CI I " , - ;1 : - I - .. . __ . [ I -, - f I . . 1, I I I I I - I I " "" . . I I � I - - - - - - - 4 - -r - - - - -7 i I z i%�� I I � r - .1- - . 4 ,. ____ -0 I I . .. I � , . . I � . I p,10 I I 1, , Iii � b I . � I ; . I . � . � ) - . _1-1�� '12"I:;, � �- I I I .VA so i I I , r� I�� I. . I . . .- � I . - . , . � ! � . -,"- ,� I �, � I . 'L � L^. I - .<4--AD � - . . I - . i & If, * ( - il't t . . 6 I. ,/ � , . - -- -7-- . I SLPPORT/. �, RESTAUR I I I � � � �_ , 11 ^�_, : .- � �t ". � .;4 ., t,c . - zo';0".., �-4 I&H po.-!� , .I � , I . fA � � I ': " . � - � %" I . ., - . I— I . I I \ I 11 � __ - I I 0 0 - , BERTHING A R A ,I . \\ �N \ I I � I . I . . � __ , . I . ; � I , I . -, I I I I I UTILITY i i I . - 0 C) T, Ili _____ - - . 10 jt� \1 I I.. I .11 I i , . , I- : � I I ______ 36 I ! . '. I I � .- �� . - . I . !!, , j��:�,O,� � - i - - .. ,- - . ! ; , - . - - , I . I I I . . -:# I _.t"N I III I � I . ,)l I I C) . � i;, . . i �, . . I � I i - � I, 66�_M- �,j '- - I�Ai I I I - ' O � .�_ , � I , .1 I I I � 1 V-43-4 2.0-0'* - -1 a H. - Ii_-0 ---! �_-�, /6,N/,IZ,- A_ I . I - . . . -�, I CC % i � - .. . . I sil�ru � i � ; k, ,�Iurs, ''In . - -1 I 1:,--, - . . 11. I - - 4%%-., %A ! I -I I I., I .- I '. - ___ I � I . I , �i- � ,�- : - .000 SF _(), 9� , � r I , - L , _e . . I .1 . . I in : - - � 5; �,- ii j , . [ I 'I, "d : , -_"N.:?, ,,.. ..; ",,, . - � I I 0 0 as - � - I . 1 . _J: ijelok . ,� X . I � � - "., L' I - . � - /_ , , . _. - . . . . . ., - --- I I - . 0 (n 0 . . - I I . .-- I . I . - I I " -,� ,- .-111., �_ . ,-f :!: I Is � j--I�C")Ak�-^ ,:,^I-- �-,",,-4, , . .1 ,. t _� � .-I I �__ '171 ti) \ * -\ kA - : . __ - I T . � �. .. ,I . . . . ! - . --GC -� , . I . _ i . , ., � , - -- - .-. �. - - -"-,F � . - t, I \ . I I . _� . - � I - , - - � �.* _. . ., " - - � I - - u Flp,I C-,HT .\Nn ,oz.,),; "- _.� I . . Iv - - I\ � � *:,�r.,_____-�_ _ 3�1_0_% 1--i�ro", . 0 , 0, C'. - 5� - :S-r�,_- - - - .,: � - -*-.I-I I I, ,� 0 _-C - I � I 7 . 1, . �. . �__ - I.., . . 1. I . . . . . . I I . � . 1, -- S-0 ,,;, - - .- . .. . . I I I 4 . . I I' - 1. I . , . . \ \ Iit� 0 46-o" -4 - � . � .� . � . . . . - . � . . I �- .. L I I I \ . . _� _______ -1-0 --- - - --- - - I - __ - - � - __� . __I--- . I I i , - - - ' . I ,!. . I � I - , . I . . � . , I 1. I . . , . % I . �,, . I . W� - dd =) Cc :): , - I - - -I� u " Z, , . . Liiiy. I � .: _1 _ _ - - - I -- - - :5 t-- 0 k�t--�--' .0 4_G� , . S �-' , cr_ 0 ZC0 10 . \ ") . , , , , . . i : 4 � j I I. .I I I �A C: .. I I � �.A I � I I - I i - I . I ,__� �A . . . �'.. " PAJ-- �' M'Ue H Z:�:) c��`(N_ � -11�1.)_-, M,.I C--C,1 A", , C->�-1".;- � . .. . , - 6 - 't- 0 ii- �- .. , \ -I . I � � I . I . 1P - .. . . I I . � : - .5 I . __ - . \ % . . I - _! . 1. I . \ - . . I- � '_ � I. - - . . Isi; . .1�__ - I . L � � , �) I I \ . � I __ :;�1 .e � . " , . - 0, a.-C,- I I . . I I I . . , - 4 - v ug - z I i 10 . :1 I . . t: , . . I .,___ I , . 1".- . "IrA%<� , � I __ . - f I ., . $ I -z'_ �.-),- H I S H - -3 0 �M e- ,:�=:>I . . - / - I z�., I �'' �,4 ," �.. If - 'I I , . . . - t..-- . - -- I - -- I .�U) .6 :?, � ____ I I .0 . I ,1\ .- I .1" , I ( - - . - �-1 , I� , - .4- I_ ;1�4 � , I � , , .. . -,_4 .,t_ . .I '\ 11.� - .- 1, ' -, : __ � . I 11 . \,_ I . -3 z - I -i\ . I I - 0 . . � .1� ., e . I � L I., � .1 . � / I - I si -AIi I 1� - ,-, � U3 W. 0,-_", IL 0, I . \ , 0 C � I - - - - ._ I ;": I ,_ . F_x -7 H I-,,i,' I 14"-'5-_� /%A!E,Z>l A, ,S ':�- I -)' . I I , Z_!-/,�vr;I46 Lt;L_[)C--.6 _-+-40w1*4 I , -�11 \ . - ) -I - 3 i I -ii i :! . . 1. . - bF - P-20,t,14 _z5117HI^_ ( F=OR-i-7 I _ -,1%, . , M I \ �\ � - I I .I , I I � . I : ." . I . " I, - , ,I "' c7r-��L-1.�Hm:>-, .I � 1 - I ;� . 11 - I - - . _ __ 14. P^&H2!=:i 70 exf- W. �J_ z _L'� t I . ; I I , . I I I I L I I I , I -- , " - . _� , -^P14:>j0Q_ RMAN:7VZ4:=P I--R0\^ ' . I k.�;,ii � I 0 01 - - - . "It.-- - I I i I - , �4 . , � � I . " I �!_-(:5;1 I- C-1�_t ,(,v O'C,r, ,nf-�4�v' = ��,Ovq r 111h, . . � , , I '\ NORTH L NiE . I - + PR -0" , I` ��,_ � .1 I ., .0 . 1 , . I I I lof__ , I 'r UINE I - I �; -, ,4 . L �k . I I J� , . . . 1- - . 1 . . . . . . i."- . I I I --_ \ r U_ - ________1____" _T-_ - I - . � - : , . �. � � : : 1 � I ____ I IJ 1, . - I S1111 . - -- :.-7-1-L I I "Cil,-_ - __ ----- .-- \ 1 \ - 1, � I 4 _; r � " , �x .. I � . �!!:_ . . / . - - . . -, � -%_ N 11 - . - . � ., - I ___�.j 8�1 ,M H111 'Plv(�, I )!S;T/"=)-, I . . I . - -I- - I. . : .. J.I , .1 ._�Ii;_ -I- - _�PIZ , -Aw , . ___ - . % __ , A`____ .'u - , � , . .01 �.1 __ - � 1 I . . I -- , ' . '. I . I u-TIZ7 H,C �__r `� - u,�_" 4 io I - . I I - A - . I � - . . - I - - - I . � " 17 , ..k . . I I . � . .. . I I . 11 . I � � I I . I - I - . � t,,-'t - : 1. . "- �.1.I -i I - I -Ilk - - I . � - . D 0 " P e � . I I : �� , � �� I ., I I � i i � � I :. I . . � r L. . I . . \ . I I I . � I , . le . , 1. . + - - - - __ - I .: . . . . - . ! . -_. . - .- - - -�� \ I . - . -1 I _� '11-� . : � � I �_ - ..� I - I .. . I ql . - - - -. I - . . - .. - I � i .0' - �� r 4.". I,- �. ;.,, .;� '. ;� - . . . I I . . I : . I I I� . _j I I a- , -�- --,.-F- : . - I .\ .- � �,� - - \ � I � � I It , -_4 C) -. W __- . _11Z-1. - Jt� I /: � � .� , - ' . I-'% (� � ! , .I� . 4u 1 - - - \,,: N _.- I,- __ . __ . __ I - '" L- . . .1� , r ,<-, , . 4, I � 1, .- � I , - , : - � li- . . - - . ". ! i I 1. .- I � - , N v , � . .. I I ; - I �I . I . I : ,ce) I t - . - . �1 '� , , � I � . ... .I. - -1 - - I - ; I I \ I - . I- , ..-___-_-_r_"j __�� , .. . r + . ,�� '." . ( . � . - -;qe--, _F-:,�-, -- . I - . � i . A k . I " �.. I .- -II . r-,6 "��ND -N;' ' �2-�z" r -�� .- --,.,!!� , - If, ,__�, I I , , - . I I I i , ! . I i , � . . 1. .�- , . I�Z j . - -1 P �_ --,-. . 16% i _ - - , . '_ . -1 . I . I I A,(& : - � 3: 0 N �, , -, - ..�, �. - I � I � I I __ ---------- --- A. . , .- , I � 0- `- Mr=Vr!�gejE. ___0:5AA0;15 _5�_,,:�'19"L!,N - V�417`i I - I . - i li�.."` -11 , - III t . .1, .. r: - *.,. .. - ,, -I I ,� _ ,I(!!Z1 - -___ .. - I .*A ii�)1. �-- --- __ v" \, \ I_-\ 9 - 4- . I � - � .. I E, � � � - , -_ . . �. I I 1* ,r . I . I . I . I . I , \ , III 1\ I o - , I � I t I . I -. � , '- "'.- � `_-i . I - I "-.� - - . . . � I 11 I 11 , � . A, ---__ . . . I I I -.1 . 0 ManitIMMIMItu _1� - , I � - . . � . ,�1��, .1 . I , . . I.-5�)Pp� pipi- I I � - . I I � - I � 1 4 � , - .,- �_. 1, . , .- , I I 0 . - III ... L . ." _- - - . . � \ I x I -typical) - - - - - -------. ____ ---,----- , - .9 � . . :� .- __ I li� �. , - I., , -- __ - .-- ___ I J_ _L-Ii �4 C I '.j � , � q-4 0, I \ I f I ed f Inger. p, ( I . - .---- I - ; � ! - . , � I - __ � . " I . � . I . . . . - I � - - . ---.**-- - . I I 1\ \ , �. I - I I , . t'. . i A," -4 OZ I . A&A - - 'I I 0 ,__, . . f ., A, I. I . 0 1- . -- _ , I" I . I - . I -L � - . ... . - I I I �, I" -:w". --- - -*&U . 0 " - - - "a . _ ,- __ - L * . - I . a . ()S,c�p, -:2.e. 0, * 1-0, 4- 0 . 4" -r�,,a,4, ,:;.o,-,'-Zt:,=_ ___. I *'I-__ - --- I A . .� , A , - - -, . � . + - I 1�1 -� I , 11 I , , . . I . .. -_ - iD I . I - I- \ \ % � � .. - :� . . i � � . + �� - - -, . I I � . , t . I I I 1. - ,. -7,0 e;0_0 R&,eov M MI ,. - . - - - . Lf) , -_,", , I- I \ �/ 1 4 . : .5 . I � ., . 1. ------ --.,--- -E�q crr t,4 Ow t-�4�;(:,r.iiQ r, I r��,vli._C:11-j(::7 IN 11* * !a I .:"L i- -- -L___I' I " . IIIIIIIIiIII;I11.- C,UTF�, - L-o � - 9 , I I - 1 'O I __ "..1 I . I � � . 1111111111IIIIIIIIIII _ I I , I I I .,� I � . L - I I I i�-, . I A. . � - - I . ut! " - () --I . 2 � - 'r I . I - I , I I .- - __ I I , * I "� - - . . I - . ., - I _ __ � --i I __ _ 11 _______ I - I . � � � A . . I . _ I iii �\ - : . �, I ,� = I . 0 - . ',,- �. I I � I - . , 2:):P-.�On Q_ 1�'_-�_ __ . \ I - I I J__ I , I �1:N i , 4 . .1, 11z, - I -- I I - � . r, I I - \ I �, �I . - - . I 'I ,,, . . I . , ---� I I I . . *roft - : po, �f�,)_�,�_4�a�__ . � --fit \\ C, . . I 0 . - . � � I I - � I . , . __ __ - _ 4 - . k__ - : .&��, O_Ql^ve�_ -.1 � I _T � \ . 15 IF ! ,; I I lt!E _"� �. - , I - � . . 1. . , . '. : 51 1+ >,C ; � \ \ I I , A \1 I -I I . I : . I ___* I IV) --- I - I (-r!_- _�_) �t w I , 4 3: -1 - 1% -1/ . b I � - � i% '. "� __ . . . . I ., . I , . - I � -V \\ (�, ` II .a . I I 11 . I I _- I 11 . . . I � - a . � . I" 0 ,I -0 III \ \ I , " � I� . . , . - -_ . I - ,.:, -., . . ,�. ,-. - A , i 1 1 1 , ?�o I 0 1 _ _ -1 -_�I' � -1- 1. I . . I . � . . �Is - . . - It . I I . _ --- - , . . 11- - � I . - � � I . I . I . 11 . , I& � I : ! I . I ; _ , . \ " - j * PrRIIANENT SLIM i i:1) ,-- . . z � , . I z 0 11 , -. .:4._-,� �I "- , I d . . I . - \ \ . . . I I I . - _ * . I I I . '' I . i 1z - ) " w 11 , � " A . �A, I ! I . 0416, __ . i - Ii., 1 . . U - 1 41 � . .. ; , I I �.: - � I - 1K ! I I III I I I - I I __ - - 11111 �__ .- ,--.*. ,_ - . IL , \ 1 d . . ,-) :) . - % IZ :! _�� , � "Z t . . I Tr I � - , i�_ , M .. .I I- . . 0 , . � � . I � I - j � �. I 11 . __ . I &_ -I I ..-.------ , - " � _ I I I . I I I . .., � . I . .14 '30-G , i� \� \\ ,I \ � . I,.� I .,I,". .. 1 .14 . t , \ . . . � LNE q- _� - I--- , . "�,_t� `t4 '. , ,�� . . -.*.%, �_-- . . I . . _. .I - . - I ., I I T __ _1 I t I , __\\N,_\ 1, . - rN I - __ , . . . . __ . . � . + " I - I , � . * - - � I L � � j� ) , , , - ,,,/ . - . . -� . I . . . . 50-� + 5 . .1 .. , - " X ' ' 'L ' * I . w � - � 0 _j F .� . 0 z I . . I : � .,:, - -, I . , - � W 0 It. . r , I . I - -* I - . . 'il - .� 1, .0 . ,� , " � - � ___ I - i " - - . IS\ . I � I __ � ". �, . . I . . . . . I - - . � . ETA - -_4'. ,�I' - ls�-0 ,;-0, I - - . I , � � . , I I " � [�- I I I I . I , . �. I . : . I-i , I-- .-i- - . - - -1 r�I . . . INZ: I _. . . - I . . 4P � _� � . ! , 1� _�, , �� -. I �' L � - I . . "I.., . . � - . C� I ! . I / . I I - 1) . -,- � "I , JAI I . . � ,0 -, , - . 4 1 - - 1, I r___ __ - - I ; I �I � I 11 � I , I I x . - ,� le\�, I !�_,_- - � . . I ; PO T , I I "� , 1 -.3. . - __ "' 41VI .- :�_,-.17 , 1. �. , I—. . _ . . I . I L k1 -I - . '' , " ___\ I . / � ,_ells I 11 . *_ . . : 0 _ _ . I I �_ � a I . . , . . � . � . 11) to. 'A, . . * . __ --- \ , _ _ ,,I ,F_ : . I I - ; IV * - .. . I I . 1 " I I I., -/' I � � . I ! . ' . 4 - . - _ _ . 0 - . . I 1\1 I _.�, � 'I I - I 11 1�' I", 'L , . � I I � I . � ____._ - (I OFFICE I L'k , ---- 11 -#_ -_� . - - __\ \� � __ -1 . . I I 1�1` � I �,� � : I _ - I 1�1 � - . - - . __ - ' ' . - . . � I � .., - . a . - '. I . - -.-- __ % - I - " __ I ANENT�'SLIPS , cl_-8,5 . %� . - . I - � � ! 0 I I . .( I - � . d -.- , . . - . . *7- . I I I I I I . w . �I I - . . - 02 I - . I . . : . I . . 14� � �. . I . . . I I � - -] ii.,�- - . 1 . - ; � . .1 . - I . - . . 11. I ., � .�; I . . I .. . . . . L�l . i i r-1N rr_-Q, E,_ � 011 I I- I �ml � . N. I '�, \ I ; � . . . . I , , I - I _;I , ,; .. � ". . � .".I . _ . . . I - . . . . _b I . R M_-, _. . I� r . _& . I - . . \1 �_ ,- - -,- - _,_-,----, z7,f_-�r c,L_tP,-., -rv- ie,e , \1 � ; - . - . . . 1 � _.� � .. , � I, . I , . - - - .�L_ � . . ; I N . --1�, _r__111EN1I0vr__C__> (_-4-�OV-0-4 1::1^5Hr_C)' -1 - I . � _ r . . ;_ , - I ;.. �_ . - � . - I I �� I _ . . . - -__ i -�-_ � ,-11 - . , . � 11. � , I ., _ _ _ _ - - - - I + " -- i - - . . __- I � q - . - -.: _ . .j-! , , � , N -1 - __1 ,I_ I j_ - I - _. - . , . - - . r � . . ------, -__ . I I . I - � . . ! . .., . - =��Iiid 4 \J .P M.M \ I . . I,. ., � � . , . " . � �. . . I . _,_--___: .- 7 � 19 330 SF , ,� .\ \ I I � - \ . . - I - I. . .. . �, . . . . 0?`� - - \ , � / 1. , " , . 1 7-17 _11:116"e7., , - , � - I I . " �7,. I � . _ � , - . . . - =-- _�-� , . r,- - . _� , , ----.-- -�- ,_ - - _r - - �. . .�,___- I . v .1 � � ",4 .. - '.," I., . . , . 0%101 __ - - --- I - --- _j I (D 7 , I % . I , � , � I � . I . _-.1 -1 � :-�, . '!IF . - � I ,� � I 1, I '. . I/ -� . .- . � " I �� '. I L I I I . . -1 _!_:2,77_L'0'D" w .-111L -1 - . __:�� --- . �, �__ _'.- __ 7 1, " , F� . , , ..". I I 'j ."L'. , , 'I_,, - I . I .� . i - � I � I , . I J_ I 1, I -,-- - - - -- - - - . �I �1 . [ I-;� � "-- - I , - . I I . . - I . . I ;,� ,r' "I��, , _�. ' , I - . - �\ ' -� I . -, � __ - , 11 - � . . I I . . � 1% - . - �� . . _ ., .,�,-�I,-. � . I I I - i . - . � ` - . " .1 ,-, I . 4� . I __ . � 'i , 9 1 \0q,C>!E_ ,;-^Q,-�!_N& - - _ < , L . " . .,�., ! - , .�I � � . ' ' I , - � . : . � - .. . . - . I -.-- � . . - I . I .. I -Z..!,�,.-*� , '' , I 14 - , I - . � . ,;� . I �1 01'. . . . I . I � . I . . w I r, � � 0 I) . -, I ijo I . � ,� I i . 'CI;. .W� �, -� , I� -, � . I __ , 4, I - . I 'r.e) - -, . j� .� , I . I )" Tt-4.RL) - __ . . ,,. � 10 I . - � . -, I 11 -ir .1. I - ,f i I . - . . I . - __ I . I P) . I I I . . - - , - :11 : ,.1 . � I � I : . L I ; I . . . - . �, -_ . (211-10 - i . 11 � . . - - - ; ,- .�N .��'.- � , � . 1, ,; IV 0 rI , , ('00 - - I - 1, 0 Gal I I I_ - , I .:-, _, I __i__"__-__ I � . , , � - , w% 0 0. I- . . , � '. 1 �17w' - � - �p 4 - , .: , I . � � 2 , t- I 0 � - I . I � __ ;','.,.�� .. . _ .. , , I . ,r � : I . . 1)�- - � I--- - -;I_01 �z� - . . . ,r , . --- - -- - -.-- . - . I) , I 1: . I � - I -____-I � .. . . _ . . . 1* . � " . . , - I . I . * 4 - / . 11 ,- ,�, � . I ��, .. - .i. I �z 4.. , ,, '., 1: . .1 . �- I � .` � I . ,9, 1 1�_" L^4-�2: I- wl � . _I _:��. I I I ,� � 11 I " I I i . . : - _�� I . 'L.',�* 1 � , - .) I --- . I " . , I - N At S T.R.,a- M _- 'O 0 , . . I 'I. I . ,�, I 'issi "' '. . ' '. - ,, -'� . .. . , . . I .. - 1- � IlIt I � 0% - I- -i - - . .. � - .1 .� 1� . � II, '. i:.��- - � 1. � . 19 - I,(\ ,- - . I. 11 I - � I , 1 ,'2 *� , - I� Il. � " - " I. I - TI .11 4-7- ,. . : 4, � " . . 11 / , I 11 I - . . . ..' I � e--1. L.'wl I I. .-. I ! . .: , - � . - � - - 4 1 - I . ,I . . I I ;_1 : I � . _', ...,�. . . ------- -fuel ton I i - -1 __ - . j I- 1. .,�4-�,- -" � . . . . < - - I I . . ,:;,' � � - -- el *�> - A II I . , -.= ; f7-' _ , , '..+ , � . ,� - , � � . I I I - � I I I I _ � r - . 41I , rN, � .- ____ , I� �" �, ,, , : �- 4�- �,__; , . "- I .- I yvlc�E� _k Z I I"I' THIRU I ,A.,� under,gr n __ . . . , -.,I -�-.-� � . . , , , . .. r SO ��' I L . . I-, .I'll I , I . ::�_,- , I , I - I 1 , I . W ".1 , - - -L ' ' - � 11 . 'I' � . I . . - . - � I o _ - - I . 1 -4--__1-1 - - i-4- 0 "-I'- �- 1 4 . � ,� I " �,..�, F . - I 1�-� ' . . . -45 / - . .�__ : _. I �� ;. I, , �t .- ., 1 .. I . ' L - . . . R.6. 4-V .. . . � .... . 9, %�I or* -Is _ . I I I - I I . .� - -. .,. . � . - ;:= � . I 1, . _- ---.-- . , ," � . ., -� �.;,� -I, ,,I I.� I ,+ ., , � ., � ,t -,- I � - - - . kliI 1 -_. .. I ... .1 - - , - �1 o.%I 111i `�).� - - I ____- ___ -L - -__ . I -- . � I . ,I . ;, - __ __ - !_ , f:I, , ��.',:; , �-,,, - . _ � . , =1 0 � I;��N�K��_�� ;I . / �� : r7ii� ,,,, , - . .. - - "I - ) I_ -, . , ` .- . =__ . . � __ -_�11 I.- . - �-_ ., r � , . , �1 . .� � - �_ I. - , - �- I ,-_�__- , - . V 11 I ` --- - , - __ _ I . __ , = q 4 _- � i !�!_-.f.,.- "'. - � I . . . . -�.-,-I--I , 7 _-� _1- . -,,, -t ... - - - 11 - :--; .. - --I ki ": , . :�, I, I � L . I � � --, -_w ,oi , , , _17 , _7 I I , . � "" 1, ir . - . . ._ I i � � T�, ��' . . : - � I .. . . .. - . I _� . I � _41111111, - '711� . - - - - , ,-, , , . . . - 4 , � - I f - : ! _4wwF jAj I, 6, �_-_- . . ,� - 4 _ I � I I I . . !'3�_ L' ' � � I - I I -- ;I . . I A - +: __ - . , I __ ., . I - - - -� --- . , . � -. I� .I. .� � -,-, �..`�� ",� � , * I . - I T[---t- / I '" , . , I I . - �. . f, L I r , - , � � ,, I 1 - I I . . . � I � . _ _%�_ � :-:7� _-I I . I . "� I,,, ,�� I ! - -!� , - , � . 7-��_� 1 _1, r' � I . �� 11 a . ; . . I � 1�: "; '_ . � I . .. I 1:1 I , � . . �. . I I 1, . �� .-11 I #, �� _` -, . I . , . - . -:��- I � I ." A� i0s"i I j�-i, �,-.f . I . I �__ I I I . . . . -, � -1 -, i * I I �_-_ � 1,"' _ , - -, I ,. , - I - - .. - . . . . - I I v - , - I 4 � - � 1� 1�1 1,.", ! ,, '. - � ,I , - , � I I . . I I , M � % ,I I I le, _z�- ,� I, - . -_ 1- . i - , � _z�i, : I.,.- ,+,,�� ,. .- ,, �1- .I . .. . . . ____ - . � - I ____ __ --I - � M / ; , 1 - . I . I . �' - I * . ,'I, I + (): R, -:j �tA-_�t�-011, - �-1, . .. � _I . , _". - . .1 . I . . , 4: , ..__ __ - r, . - _�1.1_ L , V(_.) , . I : � . N,�\10 - I , , I , : I I I - ____ 8 . -, .1 --- I . . ,I' , . . . . : V) , I - . 1% _ I � . I i� , ; " ., I 1 4, ,� . , - , . , T_-2& 0" . I I , . , I I � I 1, -4 -4 _.: I - ,, , . � I I L , , . , I I / . il I �� . �+' !. � . � , : .11 . �, � .,�+ "�,-�,�,". - .' I q "./ _� , ., � I 15 " 7JM " ! I , I I . I r- I fj� , I , I ,.'i+�,., I . - -,a I- I k :i_= I f I 1. �. . I.. I � _ I . -:= I I I I ,�, . ,�'Ij -,.-.I -, -.., . I "' I_ - � . I I - . . . . - I t. I , Li - - - Lj LI - \\ I � . - � I . . . � ! ,. 14 �. - , -, 1100� . - 1. I . - . -4-__:),_�- --- -1: I -, - i - - I � . 4- I I -. � . I . I . . . .- �_ 0, . 1 1 . I � :.*, . . .I -, == ,- I ..1: I , , I ; � � + -, , ;,��_T, .. -,--, - �, . � ,. . . I . - . I, , ij i I 4 � tj u u = - .. I . ! � - *� I.� " ""� - - :4,�,t� I .j I _j I/ Ll J Li . � , -� I - " . . I I I I I � . . .1 j �*� --.*I,,,.-, I I! - If, 'D I � - � I I --.. - . . - , . i J TOTALF IRKING SPACES- � I ,_,�I7 ,I*- % I I � ' i I I '. ,- . .4. __ .., . .� I i" - I I I A /I . I TRANSIENT SLIPS \ ; - . . - .,-__L- I . 7--: ,-, -1 ..: .. I r . . - � , - � 4__ " i" 1_ __ " . - " I . I : 177 CAF , � . , . .1 � I I . L , . � , , . . 7E57 '--�Olo-61---e ' . . I . / % . 11 . � � . : .. -__ I . I . . " I . . � , 1 " . .1 , ,4, � " ,_ , . -- I . I . ... . . I I 1 ,� I I � <L __ " . . . 1- :.... , 1(f � .1 -t'-, ,... � " � I �:, - � . . I I/ mt . I " , � -, . , == I 4�*"- '�' , " . I I . � , -,-, � . I + . _,o- __I I . I I . / . . � I � . . __ . . - ,' , . I I . N , � '. - i - .1 -, _. . . � . I I - I � 4i 11 . � ". - - . � . . . 'r , . � - �� I + . I -, - . ,, - Is,,1�, :.. I �;-4 ; . I . . . � -. __ i / \ . - 1 7=-:!W - - . � ".." , �, " 1..,,It � . I � ---lopl-t, - 'r , I .. L �r:7��,'.,'� �.- ,.,4.,. , ., , +I ..,.___w__ � 7H # I - r_a" 7C)f-,-t0,_ . . I I ! 1�4, . !� �- I . r k� I . 1� I . : - I () 'I , � - - .. . i .., , KIf!+ - ' L '- I,.,�, ., - t . I � , " , . ��, � . � ___I I I I . I - : . __- . .-, . , � - ,�, , - , L , , , 1. - - =--.-n .. . � � - - . � --(X �j .� , . I I . : 7-. , 1_ "' '. .1" . "' . Z - _ __ - ? - I I I— . . floating' platform. (typical), . � . i--�_. .'� .1, �! � ,.�t �,; ,_�,' I -1 ,"i � ", . � I - I I . - . . _. . I t) �, - ; .7__ I . . . - I I I . =_ < �. �- I . - . '.'- "'. ' � - , liIs" ;,�`-,-; .11 I I " I I I . . I -4, , . - - I., � -- I __1111111 I -_ ! I ��.1100 14 , , )" - �- "..�"� , -�',` I . 1- . � , � 1!�Ss \,�,,,:�-7-_C_ I . I = . . 11 -"A'-. I I ,� � r '.� -. 0 1 _��= . . I. . I �, I I - - I" I I _. � ` -, . �.''.., , : ,� . . . � . - � I . w . - : . . , - I I , I , 0!_ - 1! I - " . . . I 1� r- 11�1 ..� 1.11 .. 1. , .1, . � I ,. . � , I. I . - I . , __ � , � . . I I ., � � : --- .- I + . � " ,f�r,y:, �;� 0,- ��T �I � .., � I I , I - I . - - � . ,.,w - ,�_v I � .. I . . . I . M . -SLIPS It I � - I I . 14 r . -. . . 1. � , - -I . .. 7 . - -I I I PERMANENT � - .- ..- � , - L . . I ,�r " ,_1 ,::. _�,�;,� . I 11. . ,re, I ,�, I - � - I - . -01 - I - . " . __ I I . , , 1, � i-- ,., I � C � . _ �� :-!"+-. , , ,�.z I � . i H-�'.Z.- Cz", top>_,0�.L.... IAC ,!, I I _� � . .. . 11 - �� 4" L".. . "I. 11 , 1�_I . ,.11*., .� . I I . ---- ---__ __ I!] . -, I � . I - . , � I . _1::3Pq-<:> ,�- c�,zz^-N, _��# . � I - I I __ ., I "'I,' �� , , " 1�," �."__ - . & O'. , 11 I f-�Is � . I I � r, L 11�'_- . � � � . ,� I . I I - . .. _,+�j F_4 I. I L-.. I . - I - . I - - - ---- I � . I I -IVA��,j�" . ii"'. .i+.#�:.., � . I � . � ,� I . I . - �.I . ----'-- �, , I - * " I 'L� . :_ : � 1 , I 1 .2� 1 I . I " L. _%I - 1� _1 - I � . I I - - .1 . . - . - - - ____ I - __ I . - I "' , �'J_l �_. . � - , � " :.- , ,�.,I I 1�_ � ,:, � .: 1. . -A . . - . I _t^147 C�>�H Ion 70 as I - . I -_ . I - _ - - �� I - , i T. I:-'.7;4 - " -,-,� - , ., " .�.- . . . I I.01I . - I P -10, .- - ]i I I - T I �1 ----:-. - " - . 1� I ;" .'' . , I 04-i I . I � 0, "' 4 , ,-� -:'�' �. I . . . " '� �, 11. - Z4_ '9^No' - f(' �, . . . 0" I 01 �5r-WiAN.GM. 7R=-A,-r/\Av_N-r_ - I , � . , � 4, -,�% ', , . , . .,N . . y GPQV�11\i - - . F_ - . - ._11 � - I - _ - - I _. - - __ - I I 41 * __ r_ I --, � 4, � I;��.j . . - I I . . .. . -6 I_ . � - , .J ,�,. , . . I- I,,, .q.., ., 7 , � . j *1 I - . � � � -__ ,_ - i r .. _',, - - .. , I . . I . � I ! '� - � � - � , 1� I , - : ,; � . . It.I I . ,I �,. I � I .. - . -_:�., . I IN MNr___-.rr0R^,S-_ eu-C)& --- 0 - I . . . . I - _. 11 I � I , ,A'gi.�= .v/0R' ! _� --,-,-: I j� I - I , L ,. � , _Q1 - . --- _. . I 0L1t:.4iF_D - . . � - a! . , , I . .---, I ... I � .�I .., . Q,(�I^��/Ts - - . . - 4 . IIi __ L . '..."i - , � -i .9 . __ - . " � .* ,i . -6 .. I __ I F-M z� co "" 'L.� I ,�,I, i I ..1 I_C; - _� - . . - - I U)I -2-CO-GAL MIS TRY-,AA CH 'ICAL.i� I ria=movacp I= A 13 � - . � .1 � . I - 1. I � I I L " . +� I� . :'LI,' ' ,_ I 1. . '. I - ,I . . . . I . I , . . -- I 4 . t4 -�' . �. I ( , �'-,-"IL�_ ,,, I ; -1 I - - - . . .,I (11 �-0"170";#4S M 1_��__5F_AAavr_ 'rQ E;&MMViIi 17�_�-r ) I 11 -I . - I 1, I - . () . � - ,.---. ___- LL � . I - , _/ I , 11 7, .-�t . .;. - , v# � , ;;*� � I I . . . -1 _ I - I ,_I I I __ I I . - - - - _ __ 0 I . I - I � i l,r . � , L . . - _� . - I - 1� 7- 1 L � . I � . -1 . . % I , . - . :;I-u ,4- - - --- _ ---r � 11 I r �, .. -1, .� j ;- - � ".� - .- �. � I U) - - _. - I - . I ., __ � ,. ;� I .1 I I . i�-. � _�_ � .- . . _I, . I , I I .. . �. -_ I I - - __ __ . . . � . � It ..; I _ 4411'"k 1 1 __r`� - "I..., . - - I � . It -- I _ . I . : . 'r � - , ,w� . . .7- jj L I - , � I I .. I . ;. I 11 L, . . ., ,." ,?..�.z � - . �, --� I j� -.1 -,�, .4,- " 'i, I ir I � . . --- -.1 . � ,, 1i I I _-- . M I - q! _- I . . I k 11 � � , - . . ,I.. " . . I 7. . I �. , I.,. I __ I � - I0 I - . 11 . . . -,��,�F� ,� . I Lt 1� � � . � - - I . I �4 � I- - - ,-- - - -- - - _ - `1 " - -- .E�L_- .- . - - . I . . . __ 10 14� 1, �, .: � .., .." � , , , ---' . ,I , . ,- , , � at.0 I_ I . . - -1.20,______._,�_ , 0) ,.� , - C_, 1, , :, -. ,� , , . _. . . 11 . I* . �;=__� 5 -, s�_-'7- - j K: . : , . . . . . . . 1- F:�� t I �, I.K _: - L I I I . .. $ � I . � 1. I I iii4lv --- � __. - , . I ! . . - . . I �.,.� -* - I - "' -� . +. � . I � ' I _1- ... I T, I . L I L . . I . . I . . . I I I I I I I I I I ., � . .� . 1. � : L ' I . . I -- - - - - __ _� � 4i*'�_�� I I .,- -1 I 4 1;, f If - , , .'-I I I - - __ � . _ I - I . I � _ � ,4ti wiii �1 _. . I I . . _V ,I -d- i � et .- I . f 01 . - . . . . L .. --- ':--- ---� I . . � . %, . ___:_1 , " ,I� I -:' ."� .. ' - ) I,) � �, . , : -1. F I I - I-_____ , I . ---- , I ', ,,, J - I . � . . . . I I I I . ,0-�zo$�� - 7 7-77 7 _I � 1i Pi I I � I . +.� I. j . .. -L _ . 1. - � 'Uf j.,, r . - IV. i" �-"I t�., � -. � , 4� +i�I . - . . __ - . I, 1, ! --1 . - - I I I *IV 1'r � 'j-1. - . - - . 1, I* __:* ,-, , " . ) ! I 4 BOAT STORAGE / REPAIP _�_-I � i ' I-, I � . ,-. , :11 - 1, � . . I I - --I' I -, � � ,t-. i � . I - I . . � . - - -1 , , � - 1- � I. . ." I �k, � . �:., � :�!;�;�:,1:1!� , d'' - �,,! J��;iji, 11! 11 ,. ,- . I - ..-. 1. I . , �k, _ j I r. , � - _: ,_e".K.', . :, - . i - FN,K � ., , . . !!I! I ii; I I !jj!��!�� 4' -, I I - . I - . � j ,.1. ,. 1� I � _-,:__I-� I � . I 'flXed J4 ft I I I -Y .1 I " . - . � I . 4 . . %,`_� . . -1 - , � ,;. ! " I 1 . _. t . � I :� I I I I ..,1! 1I , I �,4 1 ,,i 1 I , I i � -- , .,: 11 . III r -11 . � � ,� ,-I"!*%I'd. -, I .I ,". f�,,',-.-t I r , , , 'N'�: . ..- I . I I . . � . - - - - -" , "5 0 I 111111,11" 11 11 vilill'�iii'ii�lifli�Aiii�tti'ilI )it it It I � . I - -f -.7 I,* 1�11'-� � I-'I .r I . ,,( 4 1 CIO -,--C,,,:--, , ii;w`,�!1111 ..All . � , "', : � _�, !_ :!�� I - v . i;� :, 1 71 I kj�turc 'vilth'Id!� �. �`-�Ii�-� , .; I -`,- .,. I� 1! !"- . _: ,,�,-,-,� � I . I , I I - . � , �1,�, -1 .. I 1, b7.5 SF I I 4 7 , - . . � �1 1� �1. �\_s � . � I I." . In— " F--�-, 5;_ -0 C)0 _<P7 LI, i, A , 111, . I I 4"72- .. _! ., z . . � ., . .1 _ 1-,%� T),�--- "Vo!�.)I(Rlllullulllllullflwifilliiliuiiilliiimiwiiiiiiiiiii" -iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii[illilluillilillillililifilitillitilliliffimilitiiiI I 11 11114i�'iii -6ri I � _. ' I - 4- . . " ..,. : - , � . I I - - -, , I llilill"Ul[HliitllituiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillilLfAiiiiiiiiiitiuiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'lillilhiiiiiiuillilluillillilliliuiliiiiiiiiiiiiiile - I . !-,. I I - , , ,�.1 ,� �. . . I - i U.K , - -! I I '" , � . I .. - , '' .. I,�. �. . I . ,1 � I � . : -R%%, . . "I i k!%i"-s1,_,�, .",tv:114 :, � I I _�.. I I . I , � . I . � I I : �� N I I HOLDING AREA - I . I " r I f � I., - 1 4 �,,, , , ; , I NO I I I � I t , III, . �� I I ,� , � � - . '� - . I + I � . � ?" 11 �_() I � . . % . . . , - _;, ,.�, . I . ' �' I 1, . - . I I I . -1 I - I , " � ,� . + � I - . - �r . - I . I . . � I i . __ i---,,_�.'�.- - - , . ' 16 L � �', �L - ,� I . I - tj I I -. � , - .� I . .�, �': 1, N 16N* , . , . . I de"I'll � . I ; � � . . � I f 1. r ,,%%A�L,4-C - _- , r__� , r . �,. * , _ --. �, � I ), . � .., � . � I � - -1. - _ - � - ,I I --------- ___� - I- _. ----------- 0_�;OUTF`f LINE WYS _ZRANT__LTNE �_." � . 11 . I I I IF ', "-�, - ., '.- , L� � .� � I . - I - - . . . . I) - _�e I ,3�_C> 1� I . -� ,I I � . , voliv � - I . $ / I - �_ - . � ' I . - -- - - --�� = -- -�I . , 1, .*_ . I '. * , _,_� � __ ,r--"t ' . 1. � � � . - . (I'55Uf:::) 2-t N7 0 ON Ap"Q I L -.5 , r&�,5 . . .I, : , , , - - 4, .� �+-.,..* . . �1�-11:" I I . . , I , 1_- , - . . � . I . - I- !: � - - , #0 I ______ _z;411 ; - 4 . .1 , _)` . . . - I - . 1; - � � ^.. ., . . �_ .. i to , + . I . _. . - , I" . � . . � - - __ __ I - 10-0 . � - T -CS*-'-K',-� - 4 - I�__ . ,.!� , - - I I ---- . I " . . i , . . . I ; � I 11 , .__ - __ - -1:1 1. . � . I . � () I 1�� - _ _ ,$e '- IIZSCORr�)E.Z�' P-4 SVF�FUL�-, (=OLP-4 7 C,L .. r - . - I � ., r - _ � 10 , .0T='F=1CF1 Oi`-4 0-:,_r0C)Ciz;_ -7, `701 INI L t_PX_F,'. .510 1 . I . I , `%,� I. - . ---_, __ I � �L,I ��._:A .. . ; . � . __ � .1: I,- I _. _�; . I I , I . - _. '0 II �: TRAVEL LIFT' SLIP -15 , . I _ + � I � r, . I . -1 - L � # � - I . � � I . � I . ,.�e I , . I I , 1, . � . . � I . . , I - I I -5 - � ; � -_j JAM"T v - . . i + I - . . I, . __ 01110 I I . '' � -- - OF- vSZPv r:`^i3-E -357_ .� - - si -I � , . I I I I, .I �__:. _. - , ,-� -, . I, I N"N I - I .-_ _ r 1-1 -. I I I --_190-, 11 I 11 I I - --- . ,�_____l ,,,,, - � . . I I .;,I.r' _ _ . _ -�, . I 15r_1 . . , ,� __�_fij_i : .10:1��."; ? - I - . . . - * 0 Ino AQP?IA RM"IF-1-0 '' - , - ---L % � I ; , . . f ; , . . .1 I � ��'_. L I V. - - ; � \\ -- �- _. .--- - -.-- , .; . - . . . .- i . �- I .. " ,_ , , '. - , I . I 0151^`11�tAn, LINI-r ,,,I --- I - . /I . . . � -il- � ,j r 1� , � , I- . - �_� - r I ; I . I ci) . v .1:1 1� I � � - I,,ow-A �'" � . - . . l , . ,_ . - -1 9, ;_-, . . .� �'.`, : :, . , I. . � � � �, � I . . . I I._Cr__^_rs_1_,7 lf_4z,�,t.��. �, I ! -vjjq �/ . I IZO'-'0 . . �, ,4_1� --- .1 �� ' - I I a � - - --- - - -----::- -__�-*______ _____� -- - jr �, . I . � I ; + . . - - . L_L�j "'.1 �+'L - ' 13" - - jj -I Te'ul�_C4,�Sff � ,/ . � i!. . , . - -__ 11 :: - I I-�r,: -, ,-- , -1 " � - I .. . - `1 � .. - .1 %, , . r - I .. :I �q __ ", I . - . I . ------ - _ __- I �� _4 , , ; - 110074" , . - \ , -+, -------- . I I I ___ A . A - , , I I I .: . ��, IN, I I , - . . I L 1 . , _. I - r ': . I --- � --- - I . � -, . , , 1.71' � I � __�I.- . I � I ��, - �ro,e , . . . , __- . . 1 f�*___-\�_, . � ,;--H I`--F,�!:1 -1 . �1_ I I � - I - - 1 0 . � _�_!-, - �i I � _'� . �. I I , I i - I I .--- ---- . , ; . L 6 - - N GtiiI7 F_e: . . -N I I I , . � . �1'111 , : . . . I r - 1% I - - _. _ . 1,- . . I I/ .,,;' ,I ! I - ; Cr L7,Oi�f`I L' P� '"i r=:AAPLC7-�r 1� I ; * 11 .I � r . . .E51 AFL:7Yi M S ;--- , - ------- __ __ _____-- I-.1, I � . . _-__ �. ,. . � ,� � . , I . , " I , __TJ -=*- I 41- �, + ,- � � i.r. I � .., _ - -L-E-13 _EE= -_______ I - , � P :�6Z�SL�� ',,I=H I c- I . � . �1, , I - %, 11' - I I - - - C - I / - I I I I < . i��4 " .- I. ? . I t . -1 .. I 1. .IL4"lplmf": 'i .� . � I .., . 1. . I" . I - W A-Q, E5JPC�_*- _'_'�Y'e-7MAA ,�e �5EEVVE.*,Ajs� Z5�01::1_,,1 C"C",1-!ZI W,I 1"i I I kr-I - - I ___ - - + - - --- R1 4-_-�K I r,il�o' .CN I.71 1 1 ,, M�ING - . � . I - 4 - - I . " " . . - . I I . I - . - - - - . I -STATION a SEWAGE , . I � � -- -5`-_�%Z -r -_�-:--/-`--�-r H - f:E_-��,*, ,=,1u_*_n Crl",-4.�_-3,,,II.s�_=z3, -- I 0 __ ,----_j __-1 4.--- 4 - __ - �PU OUT- . It -1 1- I I� J . 1i � - I I . I � -�,& ,,,� - - -, - - . I - I I 11 , � . r I- . . .. I'- _ _ I ,E��I -- AA S5- --I- ,�/,A=N 01= � � ______ __ - - - __ - . � - , . � I . ... :L - . � ____ __�___ -------____ __ - ____ - - -11-1 I I I ____ ______ I _____ - - - - � i , , I '. , - . , - * ;� , - " . , � *� I I . � 1. , _"`"- -, '*- � - - -11 1, ., .., I r I . , - - 0 . . . _____ __ I _51 I - , � � . I � �I 6-�-v � , vv I . :2 I_Z;, !; . 1. -_`�- - ------- - --------- _- --7------ --------- . I - _�e : .t , -,�1,1.� . - - il>0, L � i I I � I . I - I � _ , 1:;��4, . I� ,. - . - . � � , R � - .. , 4I 1, - ,-4.=, -7-. 7Z!� L-_OAA-I- I I . � I - 0 w r-j!!1q_ OF� Rz�copzo - - M . I . I . . I ,/ , . � , -; --_ � �k .!, , ,;�, . . - 2 M I V",;-- c--1 . . :2*-' LOC;,A,771 01,�I OF* I.)NOel;,C�",C�)t - f=��-Ls , -4'---. Z ROPELP i � /I I I . V_t I i I ,�.�� ___I I � - Niii R"s r--i^L.L_ ,!5�j== "IIII.- �_ID'.;?1�7,� ,� I . - -I I .1 -1 - -- 4 ?�', .4-, � I I � , � � .,_� � , . --�;- 00 F=-F=V-W, - �� , _� -� TO -Asi 1. ,�� ; - .'4 ' �,I,- 1. I," ? - . � OUTF*/141�_L !_!t ! -,-, \ . . __ � �/V�A - :E:-r -- I . il 4��i I I . ' � . - � - -, _�,C)J: e 1,zz F=I RE: �- - 1 SP17S T . !N -,_bIsi PR E, �, . .I--11; � � � ,�, .,. - 4 =-' 1-4 F - --� I.,/P,-I" : , '. - I �D__ -7 (7) -C: I . I , , �,_,! , + - . I . New - ,-�m=1=0, K'� . N�z , _ I"; ' _� � � ' I __�' ;, � / � 1;�C�IC,HA,.Ri�-r-., RS:,JE:Z, � : . �0 Q,iII� �� -- , -i 1�1 � ,,: - �. I . . - sw / . .�, , �: , � � *I T . I, 1;1 I",, L'. ,I- I ---. -. - � __ , .1 . I �. I . I . . I WN7�F_I " -, I - � � - .1 -" 1 i E, i - I I . ". 1+:. - : t ''.., 1. , ; . ,�j - . . .- - . III - - . . I I - - i . . . . � ! I I 1. �., ..�.,,4 ;k. ; I � I . III I . . ! - - . - . 11 . - � � _� i . . �. �, , I . , - I - 1111, __ v - j ,_ L I " _ . :� -1� -� .: . � ; - - ___1 _____.___" � _ ____ . - I I I . # - - . . � . 6 I - I �,� . L , . � . , . I . . 1� I � * - . __ � - . � � I _1 . " .. I- % . '. -,-,-'-, � - I .- - . I . . . -1 . I . . I - . - , I.L. I�`. I , -.14 . I I I � ,� _ . . ..14 '. - , - I . " --,-___- - __ . - . I . , . � . . . . I . !.I - --..L ,� . �, . I I -1 .--.-- _._ � I . . . . .I I,,,,,,,__�� I <-X I . �_ - , , : . . . I . I ,______.____ � - I . -=,."Ins: 1 �=�N%=N,�- ; � I I ,. I I ,% I -C.�, r- ,:L)v . ., 11 I I - -A I . - , - I , .,',�, , � � - .- ". '1-11 .11%, - _ . I � . I . �._` -1- .�- I � . . - . . . I . . :1 � .. L . I - .. _. I I I . I . ��,_'__ I t I - . I �� . ( � I r 7- - 1.�.� o 4*� � I I ,- 0 . . 1. - . __1 . . + -11" - -__ : . , r" 11 z . : ,I 1. I �. -: I * . � . . I I 10 - . - ��; I --�M::� ADN,- I:�r" . . - I I 7 - J .L-- -_- . ,_ I -, . I � I I � ;, -IN / � . I . 10 - i, . , , __�.11-- . .\ ---s T- � . . . 11 r.. I I � � .. �, . I I I I � -1, 11 _. . . I __ . _�, I . .. .1 , 1w r t . .. " , , �. . . + - I . I . .e - I + � I I I - __-'I,--- I i , '7s � , � " ; , I I . . I . . I I ! I : : - . -, I , . . ( I , : I '_ 1, ,� � - --7.�_ .j___�L" ' . I . � I __ � � I � __ __1 _____ 11 4 - in. I . I %, I __ I I : - , , ,,�_ I I . � : . . . . - _ . '_ ; � . --)a-7 I 0 I . . , I . �- . I ,� . . 1, i-Ismossi 7, 4 t; _ . .. �:11. , - ! . I . - � - . - .- �. . T. � I � * : - -:_1 i - __ ________ _______________.____-___ __ � � ,,,� . . � I . I __41__ , I � . --.f- . ;� 11 L- , '_ . 7 1 , I I � I I I � I . � . L ,q . _11 , , . I . I I . ,.� � .-.____-___- - I / , - � .1��..�-�.-��--��--- �- �-t--."--;----,�- :*II - �,�,_�' ' � *1 : ,"-�, 'I- - � �- 1. . � - I . - . . . - I _____ 9 . /_11 , � .. I . ��'. � . , "_ . , I . . � . � - 1� " . ,. . - A I- I I . I . � I I - �_ . . _ . - I . 1. ,,, ':4 ,�. . ; * ' 'T- ' I � . . I . . I I . I -1, , I . . � - .. -- . . I . . I I I � � I I � '__I ., I I .., ,--t, T , , I, F I , '.?� ." '- "-". , . " '" I . � - . - . I - - . I I � . -/_ � I . . .I , I� � , .,*,- . r IT . . . + I . - 7 . I - . - . .. � . � . I I I � - , , - I , . . I . . I 1. . '.,"' . ' ,, " . I I . . . .. I . - _. . . I . . 1. . . . � . . . � I " I I .. ��- I +� - �'r �� . I. . .il ��-� " .. 11 I ,-," � I � . . . . . ,I I I -, . . I I 11 . . . , , ; L I .", '..-: � - � � . I I - I � .., :" --, -.1, - ,, . ,. ,�� . . � I ,. -, �, I 1, . . . i. , . - - I I . I . . ,I I . 1, --- , , _.-- � , . t. � I . - , -_. . - I , � . . . . . . -.. 1� . , .I . .-.-,+. f - -� - ��__' __--- , - � . � - - � . I . - _. � i �. . � � . � , , -I- , 11 1! ..' , , ".- .� - - __ -� .1 I , , ,, ,w " . .� ! I. - . '� - _;��, ,,,- . , I r' . � -1 I I -%, . I . - - . , I, I I I. . � . : .. � I � I ;I� I . �,, I - �, . I I . --- . . I . . � . . - . I ; � � , _', . �'t;--- - �. ., � . . -1 - ,7�� , ,., ( ,,� , ,I , . - , � . . ,, I . I I I . . � , I -. r -, - 11 I - , I , I I . . . I,- . I- . . (� . I . ---.- 4 .� x . "1, I !I I : L .- ,-7-��_ :_�� r _. , , � � , - . - . . . . . I . . . . . . � . - . %_ 1, . . I � . L . -.1, � ? . . I " 1-1 I, , � I ..� � _. . � __ � II .1 I ., � . . - . I � I - . �. � . r '�- ! - _W - . -I . . � . . . � ,,I ,I , -.�,--, �I J-,.� . -:, .. .,--10k@g:M I I AMT, Mr, M L 'M , . I . . - '. I I . . --- . .. 1. I I . - . I . .. .I . �1 5'a,��_�,_Ic_ � 0 .. � , I I- .� - r I I . -,. . . �, � . � ,� . , : I I ,.: - D M 4 . I _-/ I . I . -./ ! I ___ __ --- , -I I . I � ; � :,_ I k I Iq,��__ .imool*- - 4 I : ��_ 'r, , 'J. . V�rj,--.CJ , t . . . . I . . i I � I , . I . r I .� " _ .� ,; -,... " , L__ if ww��_h 1k - I . . % . I ! 1 I 11, � . - . I : . I . . . I � AL I . . - - -r, I I '. � - I . I . . _.I _+ .I - "I.- I! ,�'-,, - , ,-,' "".I 1:11 ,. �" L-. . -.�.� .- - -. . - - .. r � . - ,� . 1. . v�__ I - I , - ",:.- _.". " � 1,I, - - - . +� , � , - �� 7 '"' , *1�- - - - - - .I . : �, � .; : , .I .i �3�1' ,+.;,-- , I , v - ':i, , �- - - � -, I � - -__ _ , - ,. � _ . I - ' - it - .. . P � I " '. --1 I, ��*�" t L if - . . . k � . .. . . I -- 4- � , . - - 1,,1.,., , � . - I - - __ - � � .. i I , � . ... ., . , � - . . . . . .! . ". _.... ,�'.",-." ,,-�,'�-'- . "''.- -i . __1 .1. I , - , - �. , :,: r ' �* 11 I'_ . . I I '.�_C:): .. 1'._- , �', � 0 . - I, .� . ., . , , , I __ � .- . I �11� I " ,, It- '. ,, --, - ,-� -) "- , " , . . I - � . . . . . I . . --- . . L . I 1. L I , 11 * �I 1. ; ,s-, i . . - , , I , __ � . .� + I - . , . . ,� 1. I ";,-:. !1. � 1.. , :�-, , I ". �" -,,-+ , ! � , . -�e - I.... "I .... I I . I -- - . - . - - . .� , . � � , 0 I I'. .-I �. ,, . , 1. , . . - - . I I - � . . �_ __ � ,:_ -;.,.b'o - I _r - � . �� I, � �, , . . .1. I i - . � , . . 1, I.. . , , . ' * L . : . � .1 . � . . - . - - � I I I . . : '' .,.I, I � , , � � + _��, , * . . � I _ _._�," : : - � I ; . .,'�� .� - � .� ,_ _ - , � N .. I L - ., . -.1 .+ I .� ,. I � " , - ,; 4�% _-, ,,,-,,.,.. - _:_� �. . I ;- - . . . . . � . . " . .., ��.-!,,, . " '*Z� � - . , � I I . . �j I � ': t. �, I - - , . . '. - . - . . � � . I . - � . . �,�',1� 14 �. . , � . I- . , I I . I � . �I "ia.� " r , r I -1 � . . - . . I � I .: I I I I � - . "I �_, I I . " � . . I . . . � . , � - . . . ,�, � . , .," I -�- ,�� , , - �, .�.",t"!r, � � . � . .. . . . . . L - I I __ , , -.�-�:_ _ L �,��;' t' r,_: ,,,.I .� :. � , I - Is - I . . . . I .. . . - . - . . � . . . . " � . . I I � , .�___�*.' , 'y .I.,-'�'-_ ,� ': "._ � 11 :I� M , ,, I i �",I +I , ., . . . . . L - . � I F 1. .N - . � I* __1:_j,___4- I , I I. +4 . 7 _ , I I I I I . . . . . . � .- . r . . I _� . � � .�*" �. -, - - . I � . -1 . . i ,7� ,!' . . -� .��.i� , , � - - � I . . . . . I I I . , - , , , . -, ,"I _.,I �1' - ( - 4 11fe _� + ,.-"A.-- .1 .. . . - . . . . . . I I . -1 ,j , , ., . r ,_II!,,.',,_, _ . � I - - I " e : + . � . . I . . I I . I I I_ - I . - . . _ .,�_, � .111. I .. . , .. � . I - � . � ... , I I . I . . . . . . � .:- L� - , , ' 'I � I .;�,�r�. .- " - .- ; . � ., � , r , � . - . . . . . . . . . . � . , . 1.I , . ._. ______ . . �. � 4 � I I "�, ,", - .; -"A �.�- ,"" ;';+,,,". I �. �__.i__1 . , �� - . ,/ . � I , I � - ., L 11'�I : -, - , I - . I + . . , - . rt I Z : - . . � . . . . I . . � ' � , ____ . � �.-%..��,,, -,',-:�,,��*! I . ,�_,� .I I , _ ,� '. , - :* . __ � , ,�_ . . ' � .1 , t-:; ' ' L.' I�.'�-. . "'. ,.- , ,::, ;� ,. *. ,-, , .. I , t".- . - . I r I . I - r , ,.� . . '. ' .' F" - � �,�r- 7 �. ,.�" , � ., .. . . . ,_� . . I � . ; I I. L - . .�_ I ,�, , -' ', _':��;' .." ., , . .. � kh- � . I I , , . .. . , ,� 1 �, I - , , � , . . I �+ . . ... . ., . - . V - - --- '. . - . , � I . I ... �� . �.,_��.,� %�,,�,- -"-... -., , ;- ,� --,,� I I � � I t . .. I.,I I I I , - ,� -I � I. �e :. - I � .�� . I - . I - _., � I I _. . I . . F . . 1_. . '... . � %. ! ) . I ,. ,-: -;��i, ,-�: � .I* .��t . , 1�, , - . ��I� I ;L, , . - - � I " � co . . %, I - , %, . I - �. co ',.,-� ,,,I , I , , ;I -.- '7 1 1 ___ I I .I _ - I " ;-� ,. %-,-;� ".I �, % � 1)". , .1�'. , -Ik..� - . 1, - , 11� . I � I � I .! 1 I I 1� . , ,.� : , . .. _ 7 .� , ":. , - '_ ,., � , � , , , � , 11I e , " __z . '. -_ .". , - .41 . - . . . . .. .. . � �". I . , � �� , . .. .. 11 . � .I I , . - . I ._,_� t.,-, .,-,, , ,: ,,-,,-1, --, ; ,, I _, " - - '' , - , - , , . - � . , - -i I - I I . .. . . I I .� I I - .. I '. . . .-I . - � I - � . 11 . I . - - . � ,� . ." - �: .,�, , . . . - � .-- I . _L . . -�-, ... ---,;.- ._ ; OL � .�, . I . -, '.: --- �,_'� - . . - ,�, 1�.-,f,` I � . I I . I . I . . .... � . I . . : . "I I ".�f .I 1, . � , ��',,' �" r . ' -,. -- , 'r- , I - 11 � - I , . - ," . 1 .1'. I - -��,'� - . I -.1 __ L] . - I . - I . _ I __ � - . I "��-� ", ; ,- , -I I �. .�* I . �, . . . , I, , , , , . - I , -. . ,�, . , , , . I 11 . I I . . I . - I . + -1 , I. , - ..�,_ � . . ,- ... ,, ,,f.� ,� " .. I. � :. . I .; . , � I , . 1. . I - � . . I , .,I� . , 11 � . I � '. .�- , . I I .� .;, .� �, 14 � -11 .- , - . �� "_'... " ,) ,I I.- � .. � ., , �. I - I . � . I . . . . -,,,. �P14 11 - I T I � � 1. : � I �,A,�I�, ,,, Jku__ _ ,_ '..., .� " ".%',_.-. - I . E;1::t __ . I I si I , I . 's , � - -!, -':, � � � � � � 11, 1. . I. I I � - I . - - I � . ' ALL CONS LiCTICINI _;,..i. , - ; .- . - I.-. . I . � z I �.%' - I. <_,�, I , - I . ,�.,-� Z�',I: �-�" "'Ir ": � I . I . . 1�001;1�)� , , �,��, �'. �'L,`� . , - ,�j""� 1� 'L �' - ' I ik 1� __1 . �, - . I. I I _. .- . . - - I. .I � I . . ,- � ,,��'_ ..., -_--� "' * , .-1 � ., ' - - . t .'.1-'. I . � . I :,;.� I— � I I' I - . ., *;:-,:'.,., "7",,.�-'WotIt , , . I I . I I � I � I __�._:-t , , r I I �. ,, � _,_____--_:_�_ � .I . -; . � . I�r . I .11 400- 1-1 0%5 L_I 6w t.4 . , , - �:',,' I �, .,�,�" . . . __ I__ . I . , . _ 11 � I I I ,: � - - n,�, * 1: .1�*1, I _ , -" , .',r \ . . I . � I , I - � I - � _i� ,,,� , �,r ;I1, , , � � , . , . I . rr � I . , , ,7) � I . I � I �_ '. I- I ,I . . " . . , " .- . I �-. t, ,J�;', "". . - - - - - , �.� . , ." .�L � , . . � --_cz r � - . I . ,_, .1 . I ,'L_' . I r . . . q - �,:�� , - -,,''. '.T, I �1,1,1 ,�,%"_ -_', . .. . � �_� ,�,:.�,'� � � � __ . . ->) . . . . - - � .. ,�: "i r�':- , , ,. I_. . __� , . ,-I F I -i?_ . I - . . I t - � . I;,S"'. - �, :�,".! . , � . �.�.I�,�A . I. . . I . . - - '' . � . 1, I I o .I� � �I. 1�1.`__ , 1, �.- � I '�� . . .z- I . . - - -� : . . .� I . . - "I�, � "_% . � . . . I I , � _� .r.1.- �;11 - � _r , _-.1 . 3.45 -'ACR8 ' ':(,I' I" - 1� I'A '' �1. , i " .,+, I". �,.-i, - . IV-x- ., , �L% �. 1. L . . - II, . ., . - I . . . . . . . . -.. __ TOTAL LOT AREA ;' , ,_ 8 5p��?82',�SF f,�I I � I i , -- - , . . . I � � , '4 i ""'. ,� - � - --- . . . +. . I -It . , . 1 � . . - . + � . . . . L �(_-.'A,�;�, , I _"tA �, t,�, ,+ - I . I _.I I _. � , d . I 1* -N . I � - . - __ r I I . - � -1, __,� ;- � .'�r,;% �._, I - .- � .t," -_�..:., , - - 1: �' �",I ,"�,,.� ''."� ,." . . 1 _�,7 , , -1� . I .+ - I - ;... - �, -., , 1 , '.1 I I � .. .,_. I I.,_ . ,r',' !�--., � 11,I 1, . � . I I, I I I .. . I I � . I . .. I; "' - I � ...!�i_ . . 1,�-,.,��*�,I . .1 1,4-�1 7� -,�-��- 1- ,:.. ,- ., ,. . I 1, . . I ., . . . .�. � I .. . MAXIMM, LOT AQVERAGE ALLOW D. �5%6 I-', �� --4' . _V , - . I . I . I I .1 . .� !,�.--," '." -.,-, . , .. - I � . I � � . I . . N . I I .. � 4 4 -I . , " I :- I .,� ,�-4t I I I;, ,. I I I I � . _� . . - . , -1 I .I 1, I `��,��- j '!�" I , ..;...�_ I I . � . I I I I ' '' ' I; I: ., I . I . . . . - . , , , I . . � . ,,, . , . .1 . �. '.- I-,.--,1 j�', "'., :�_,-,%,%� , - � - -`-�-7.`�,,� , " , , .. ,, K . . _. ' """3,0J42�r`SF-?�`05_5% COVE"GE I � Z_ '-,;", �. .". i - ,� , ." . , - - . -, I I . I I - . TOTAL BUILDING 'AREA ` .'i"" - ; :,� z , - "" . I, . I I � i . . ": " "" �' "� '. ---,� �, , � , I, . , . , - . ., " - � .:, � - , _��4:.*, __;;�. , ".. -", , , . . . . I .. , _" ' . - �. I --'.fll ..I'-"- . I � - 11 '' I .1 I . , �, IN' . . � _. I . I I . - " I _'� - I , .r4 � � I : 1.1 I . I , * , - I � I . - - . I- � . .", . "� L' ' � .'I , � 'I il- � - - -f :CARS- - " . , :�"' , -1 " ,I . - , , ,.,% I -,;�'�.. . I ,�, �� 'L'-' '-I - :I : �-, - , , . . . I 11 -- TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED" . 17 � .. � - i, I � � I I �'I - " -':�, .�, .. � I _ ' r , "I" . , , : ", . _ . `L ,_. .. I '. � '. � 1.� " " �,- 1� ., ,1.'� ,"- .� , - - - , I _ " _. , I I ., . 11 . . . I" � + � , " � � , � . .. I I .1 r .1 __ , �i�LL, �, �I-� -1 - _;.,f ,.- - : . . I � .1- , , " � . � . .", I.. ', '_ "L " .:`��, :" v, -1, ,.��" 1 _ , .t, �, - �. � . � _. I , � , . . -- 'I�- . ;�;� `` , � I ,I , ; -". ,�. _ ., � . - TOTAL PARKING .REQUIRED' ,�� CARS' .: .. . I I ' - " ' .1 ,��.. , ;4.1,";4" ., �I ." '.' .r'L'.� . , ', '7'% '.. ' ' � � , . -,- I .. \ I . . . I� I � .. 1� _'..- ",", � '_-._.i � - ____ -: '!_ `--.1 ' . ,, L *�*ry__"v � ;,. I�, 1;;t ,r� - � , I _�. .. . ,�- I ,� ",-- ..,:-I- * , , + �; -1 I , I � . "I� I I . � , 'I L' . r. , . ,-�. -" I � � - � A I . . . - .I., ..t 11 T". %4- ..� :., - . , " _- , 11 . � �i I__ ��_ I .-I, *1�, ,� _- �'. .,,- .., � ,:- I � I . . . a . . / . I � I`k I .., �' - � _ . , . I ., 1� . �, ! -_ ,%',.,�;�.11,;_. " _P11 , , I �", I.. -i_11� *!" -.' I �; I ". I . I , 'I- .. I _ I 't�, , 1� j :,."i . �, ":. I I '. .. I , - - , . '7ii_ - . .I . �, � ` _ ' , . . I �1- - + II, . I . . . Is I I I + it, _11 i,L,4��., . , I - .� I - �, r ;�. . . - __ . - . . I I . - - i � .- ,�, ;�__t . � ,- -, - 1. - " . ,� , .. � - 4 I i i3_� ,,..'�, �, r . . . , ,1�, I I � .; .. " ' ' ' - i " . % .. - . 1 . -1 ._:�� I , �, I . ,�. .. �' * 1. I � . I I , I . STORE. rr- ,v;� ';ial-i -11 3N SF --'-L- 11 3.-CA i ,� , , "', _ --, � _ �;- 1,-I-, I 11 - � � I � . . �' __- " I a , . . 11 .1 1, . �" . �, -, I - - . , ��, _ . , � . .- , I . I - ' ' _-L-�,�' ��;! �, 1, I . 1 - 11 I . I . � . III ...i________1- - - � ' I . I .,_�� IR , - - - -t,--_,f "; '�� .`,�,-�'�,I I '.)� ,N`1,;ro .1,I .:1 - � . 1� '� A�' � � vl�L � 11 - - ", - .o- I .. ., "', .,,r ,- � . 1. . � � I . - - - - - 77- - -- .,� ., - il; - ,_Zf, I-,,-,*' I � ` ,� L , 1, I - - -- -7 ;-. , , - -. I 1�` /�; SP _�,� - � I ; --1 --,,- , ;-,,,>" _ I., I o:�1. � - '' ' I I 1, _. . . "i - . . BOA'r STORAGE ;:� 0,,dAR' ; � I T -" -, I �I .*,*� . .- ,. . I . f.d.- I I . 1 k I . I k&1. '. . ' " I � ...: �, � " . � :.. , -1 -;�, , ",-;."!-- +� % . , I � - . . I � . 1 7- . . . - "-,, ''�_ ., 'I,, ."' , I III, - __ 1 14- - � ... ... , �,��11. 1 . 1 � 11 ". . . . ' ' , - "� � , I � �_ : ,71 . , -_ . , I . � I I I I f � ERMANENT JBOAT SLIPS "" --- --ir -, -w "I I 1_�. L,'.;`_4�_ ,� '...,�'-- It, I " � , , i I : .rt,.�.,. - ; ,-1 I. " ii� I I - I , � I '--��-i;iii - "12 SUPS-' '-;�--iii- �83) -CARS �; : 'I " ., -" �I . ,.., ,� I � I I- __ 11, . . I I I I . -1. .. , I � - ' - 1�_I , , � I - - ' - '. . ., I �;. , -� � , �, - . -Z - �,� ` "_1 .1 ,. I - ,, I __. __�� . I . . I . . - . � RANSIENT. 80AT SLJPS - -�,* ' -71. SUPS :' .�-_-�- : () CAR,I -:� _j, t� . :-;.;.;,"I I .., 7 ' - ' ' , . I . _ - , � __* __ I - - 7 I 1�'ii -'�'Lf , -,., - .� I __ - � - - � . . . - - ' I . . . I I . I 11 - �, ; - I I - � I IIIIIi ,� , -,.;I I -1 IL ., 4 ,,, ,.:;�.- "'.1 '.I'- I . �, , �7 � I I . 0 �: I & LOUNGE --- ---_ :925 PA +' . , 3N � .. 11 � .,, . , - , . . L . -- - . , !"�,,.'.-,,��, :.,� .4 1,"-, I. � RESTAURANT TRONS7- ;1, ;,�, i _11 - . .1', , ,�I� �+ I - , , , , ... . . - . -, - . - � "... �-,- .,;�- I " - I.- ..I , ",I - . �__ - . � . , �,-_11-4, , -�7 1 ,;�'. I , , "n I- I- �. 1, �. � 1 ..,;�_ . '' )"� � I . i � I . _ _ . � . I � - � � .�, -. 11_� .1 e' -'-,I "�,_, ' F' ' ' ' ' ". ' :, � I � '. ,�.'_ . ,_ .Ii , I �r . . " I - - - I ) . 45 -_`CAR�'�: - I,��-- _ , , .. , - . __ . ' ' :1,,_r_:'�', ,� . I ."', ,- * _ �. I . ,�' "- ,.. L,, _ 'I, i �, _ - � " 1� , , - , I , 1 I I I I .. I __ ___I . . . . � . - �, - --.--�ii.vi ' -� I -1 , ," L�- I,' �_ , I . i --I I- I �;�.,_ x, - �; ,.", . . , I I �� ", I . - _ - I . .1 - � I OUTDOOR DI�J;NG-.-.- _�_ .z-___- III.- I , - .' ` 75 PATRONS - ss-iii;�1 5�,;4ARS`�!-1�-� --- -� f�'. ., �-,; !. - , , , ''. 41 I I � �'. I .1 . --- - I . . I I - 11 .. I :_.. --c" ;6_'..'.��. '.,_,__�, ', I . -,�*. ,�J'�. 4"-I., ' "' , �; ,� k / . � __ . - -, .,�',- , �:_L,"�..',!7' .;," , -1.1, r-.. 11 �r,_ ,:-.,�-T&,� , . . - - . . , - , , '' Z :, "' , ,�� - - ---,,"', " . �I . . ' 'I 1, / � . .----- . __ I - _ - - . -".,. ,� "I'I ,�-;', � . 4 1 _1 � .�,`,' .��.� .,.;,5_ 1 � . - - . ' ' - . I . . . -1 _. � I . . . "I - I I 1i . - I , " 4,W, A, IL -,�'" ,-, I . .1 � " . .. ,,z�,,,�, z *Zr.,��,_,_- �,_., - I, - _1'.*"_y,(,_:� - , * � _� I"I . . _ � . 1� � � . . . , � , A:`'14. � , .1 ; _� I I - , I I � � . � � . 1, � I ,`N.� .II. .1 1� _�, ,,�_� � I,1 4� � , , " . 2)�., I . I , " ..' "' I , �-, " , __ --- - -� _;",� L *,_�:4�."-", - . , , "�, �"" .' � � . 1,,-,,,I "�, ,� _� , �. _. , . , . . . . ,.,- . ...v��,.� � -,", 'l, _,.11� �� ,7"�, . - , I .", `4.��-�",-, " ,:,,,..11 "� . . . I % � I � � I � . I �I . . e'L"_ , ' '�,_' . : � .� - , - , , , ; � I I 1, I I .* . - � � , , .,:,.. , L�. � ,_ .� ,�I"" _�, j.'.',"-�'r � I I , : _�* ,�,��.�, .,�,...,;,�, . ��7� ,�...�r, :#,'_�; ,i,., .� --:� , , - -- - I ,-I Zo�_4��P`j Go I-- - I � __ ': I " �_ � . . .. x ". .�,.��.':, _ I. _�'.� ,I . , . - . � I _ I � ; , I , L�^i ', .1 � , . . . . . . . . -.1 I � .. 0 I - ..I. ; : ". �:.,� ,; ,,, . _ ..-. � . -;x- , ,, , - ��, : - .1 4 ,�� , . �, .� -,-,, . k I .� . - � � � " ", ,..;+ . I.,, - -,"j,""'; ,,,*,7,.,t",*_*�,�,� , , - *��. ',', � ,., � -, " - '. I . I , . 1".1, . '_ *_ - .r , ,� , I t .q,. -� � - � . r� -��'I-'- '-;r P;�',.-.. P,- ,��A.�,-._-� , , . ." .,r�,,,-��..',-,,,-,"F".�---A-,, .," _, , '� , I . . I I I . I � ' * ' ' ' 1 " ' - ' I ., - ' t , ' '(� ' '. ' ". .. " ,�: . I 1. � � .1 " �:,. - � ; - F0"�-- I I I - " � "''r. "' , � �., � , ,�41_ �� ?it .� . � I � _,�,.r �Jr' I . � I , , � , . . I. � . _', I I I . . I -�� .;_;_i , . , --, ,�' ",I-,i,�, -,�, . I , . oF4 TOtHis.p I A845EWt1jRV1E?-.,.Pv ,: -, �: -,; !�'.t'�;-.�,'�,,!.� jr-t:,','�, ,-,,". - _ . , . �', ,�-, . 1� _. , _., ' ' I . t. � . . / LOT COVERAGE.PRI RbPo8b�:ti+t:,bMLbP, M5NT,,A , �, . "' � ,� , .- I%A +�,�_�,� �-.,--,-�",,_'.'�*, I.,� .;��;, , �', . . *�' I - I I � . � - . - I'- i _. It . � , si ' I V/ "'COVE144m. ., ,I 1�- , , .I, ,,�..,� , - .- .�� -1 � , .' _., I z +, ' I, - _ � , -�,_` . L�. "I, 'IT � j, - .-' '. r �, 4,�� I I -, ., � 4 t-;;.,.,:"._.I_�- I ,. I . I, ', _.�� " 4, . �,- , I 1;�� . . - -, -t I . - .."-1�.�,";.""., - -,�,!.N,--,"f , A I � I 02'11-6�-" , I.. . I, ,� - -1 . ,v I .� 4 � . . I ,_ . I .J7.,Z 9,�_ .7. -, .'�',4, ,, :' ' - �_; _, "_ ��, : � , ., � , . I L - I - - - .,V,,� , - _ , ; ..": ._�,."-�� . .i, I."-.,\"- - _ 1,,14,- ) , ,�:" " ��.�T',-� _� , .1 I I � � . � - . . - I , .� . .;,1, ,.,-� ?",�,,,''', - . �_ ,7 . _�. I �;_,,, ,, .. , .. �..�,- t.:.. "". . " , . �'� � , �_/ . _. ::� :. I�� . BY RODERICK -VAN 71ii OC� DA .. .# ; - I _ TkD-,AUG'11,4� .1., , -1. . - - -T . T --," "'.- --,:'�--t� ` . 1. I - .- I, ------- - I ;__ .-, I I . 71 *,V� N71,N " , . --, �;. ---,,.,-' - "� - I . . . I � I I I � .. . � . . , _11'.- ,�. �' :��- " _" I I , I I I _ - t--J�, I .-/ � -' :. ,, - , '.., , �.,.,,� . ' .1 , . � " I I I I ;,.� I ,- ., , - � � ', �,r_ "i " " I � � .1 i � � I I _31L . , , ".7. , _� ,*- � , ...- - , . � .. - . - . . - � ;1,.., . I , I. , 1. ,_L,��,"" -, , - I 1, . I . ,� - , - , , -,r '-. . If�'?.,.11"_.77�� -+. I .1 _ I "� 1, , , . I � - , $ 1 � L I � --.,�.�*. ;$ ',�L�.�,--�,!��.*!..11 ,. - , , , _*-'-.- " I..--, "!4_ . � -, 7" .: - ! _ . , ou �r , I . � �---,, , :, , I - � . . % * - _,:�'. _ � � �'__II, . , I I 11. 'J" I - ,: . . . I I? � �. , , I , I . I I - �. , � , 1.* . -, � I . . � . .,, , - _,�: . ;�f� ,- ,,qP.,, ,; , ,AL . � �, � _ � ._ , - , L,'A"- I , * . I . - I . I 1/� 'I . - ,� - : ,I I�., . ,.I. ; ,%'.' 1�., r , , 4� : " �*_,`,i-).','�i�- .�,11 1, . It- . I I ,:1, I I -�-'-.,,.�--,-,�,.I,- -�"�'� j,_L'j . "- _ : �, . � -,- .� . I %_1 I ,, I � I 1. -ILI I.. ,�., - ,�� -t, � -- ,,, "'. , - � I, , . . . � , ,,-.4.111 , I , ��,�;!� � ��,i .I ;,, . � �j -�,:,i�'. ,�r-' �:��I:r.:,.. . .1 �"�4*-��--,-� , " ,:1 , �,, I , I -- I . I " . I I _-; .. I . % ,..t�,I�4:-:�, � . � 'i�,,�,+, �1*I . . - I �':" . .'4 '?� r I� �L � I + - I - _:- . .. , , �, .1 , I" . 4 11 � ., _11" . I I .. `,'.i, �-;' - , ., ,.. , , .. '..�.�,,�� , , ,, . _� i`;,�;,,,,� --� ; ":_- �. " , � - , -- - I I'.- ,1. - .�� ,'�', I .. - �I,- �7-" ' L j ,L':,_�. ,-��,. -," . L I ,� I � ___ . \1 . � . : :, I.'' ... _,'I �. , - , - z , _, _ I I . I ,�� ',I � "I , '. ,�-.. - �11 � - �. , . ,��;* 4,L, , -," `, -, P �. . '! ,I" . I 171 I . , .1, , , I 'L� ..., 1, , � i . � - ", - , - , , � , .-I, - ," -�, "t,� � , -:._-1 . . . . I;. 11, I - � --- I � - . . .. I .. �.: I ; , - , �,�� '. �f -,I :. �- , , " - ','� v" :��,I,I . �, , . � . '. .. I � . - .- I N � .. -�---,,, ,,,,, - . , , � ,, .i%-, .,r�,�,�,' I I ,�, . 1, , .. ,�. I .,. ,� � , , -, . . - i, ;1 I I , I ,� ,�'.' * ��, , '�--'_;,.;I_ '.."", -';',"""��';�_:L'� - - .. .1, 1� ,,, ; 1-i I" I 11 �� I . . . . � I I 1�I - .. - !x . �, �,,;- , ,,;-, I- .�, - I_.; - .., . . . I �I � . . � . . . I , � ,�� ;�4 ,� . :,s" �,�'..,- , . - � � . ,.:: ,�. ,I . I... I . . � I 11 . .I I I . . -. . . ..;� . ,�_ � _. I _,i, .'1',-'1�1:1_L- , ,I:,"',-, ,.:,+ , - :, � � .. , . , " . "I -1 .,?. " , , I - ,� , " ,�, '* ,J_L_,��''. -,�,�, -, ti, -�,.:, I � '�' , -_ . I � I I , � . I �I_ I I, .. -.4 ,�, , �I ,� '.�t, I ,, '� I , _� ,-J- '_ '.�, ,�."4 ' I . "I..j.��, . +,� . ,,�, _ _ , -I,,, � J:' ';, t, � -'�i, I rif,�,,�,,�, ,�-� I � I I . . . �!�.I" ,, ,"',--z�;",,,.,,, "".��, .. - _ �_ ,* * ." . , _ :,,,,, , � I .. � . 11 . _/_ '1� - I I. . . , *;�-'..,-',�.�, - .� . ,�"".'."'�.�, - I . � ::�"'.-,, ,- � "."� . ,,.� � - I I :� N," . I I - I+ I I ; , I '. . I . . .,;� , " � +� 1. . I . I . I . . , . !� �' '.,,,,'�_, , , - ,.,z-,j4,,I'.I7, ,,"�- I.L, �, I ., - - .' -6 I � ., .11 , '�� ". � ,�-.�........ I �,� , , I � I ,;,;" .- " � " "., 1�"6 �- ` . ..- .. ,�.'.I It I ,,- w I N , - I .1 I I �, -- ,I " +, ,. � �,- - ., f ,� . � , . �, � 'L� I , I ik_ , I � .I I I I I - I ': -��-,, � � � "� �'- - -, , '0,� . . , . ,, 4 ,; �� I , , - - , w I I , ,�., - , �, ,. I I I 1�, ,-�i.-,i��':'�/�r:�,:L*��" '�. ��.�.��',"�- _� ' .... , , , , . . . I . . , 1�,1. : . - . - ,� ."A"_ I ,� . I , � .- I � . , ,: . -4 - I I . . I �r I . ,I, -;,- . .� - ;�"_,, '"!"l-I _', �.','_ "I- -, ., 11. �, .., rZ � I 11 I , . . , ,�:� , , _� . . �- I - ,. . � -, � � � .- , ,� - - , . I ,I,, � 1� , -;�, , I --I -,. - I `� -;. ",� :1 I 1.,:, . ,1, ,�, ., ,, �. - I - - ;-- �- - -1 I . , , . . I 1. N - �, . � � . I , � . 'I" i � ,.. . .�,,,"�4;, -,,,. "-- � ..r �I, �`,.� .".!�, , I - ,. L I. I . .- . , ` .I "�,_�,i.'.'* ,�, *,":, 'r," - .�I�"L,,,��r',,,_j1 "4 ��J,tz��-, -�.- `�I� .1 �' I � , , . � I , . . I . I I I . . i- , , -��ba w�-, _�. . -, , , ,_.., I. - I . 1+ � . . � . . , - .. , * - : , - I,,-- i!" 'I r L"�t,l� . ., I . r, -� _., " " I. -I:�" I , _. '. ,, 1-t ." -- � . " \ . .. ,,�'t'.',�., -i � ,� . "�;., ,_ .1. � . . I I III . I-_ . ,� 5,�, I . I 1� - . .,.�L,,I - -� .. ,-, -.-.."'.I.; , I I I I�- I I . . I r )I " ,'. �,..:,�'!` _4, .,!_.t_�"T. I�,� ,., �, ,,�,� ., ,i��'1, .".Z),� ,.t'. , :, ,�. "�_ ,1::., � .. I I I -I, . , .I I . - " - � . 1:1 t I � it L�"I ,..,,, y , . . - -_- :� 11. ��, ,;�',-�,,_.��Z.. �;,-� ", . " ,.v , �. �,�;!'.."l--.I-'-,,-�s; , . . . - ,.� i I .."�,�, �:,.'. ��- r-" ' I " ,, ' . . . . I N t_'v0 ; . ,74� ,� ...- _ , , , _, -�.I,� -., � ,� , " , � . ' - '* , ':�'; � - I . . -T�_4 I . - . - , . . - . . - , ,� ,1.. 7 I . .�, " , . ; I , J.�'.� ,,� I � ,.,#1 I . - " I . . ' - � ,1, .. ,�'�;� �,.,.t.z,,, ,,�, " � �r I . I ': " � "" V" *,��,, - � ".I ,� I + , ,,' .�,�'I� � , L. 1_� "' '. . ' ,. � r I . . I. . - lj , � , , ,;,;,� I, ,�,�� ,- .-� .L,-�'�;% , �, _ � � '. , , , , , , , ,- � � , _ �, - - - - - - . � - 1. + - I L I 1. I I � .� -�.�,._f,_, ,� -�' �_. -.:,II:`� , , .,*'��',�";':�,.,.,- ;"� , . r I :. � .: , , - , . .. I: 1� 1�.. I I .. 11 '= . .__ I I I - . - I I ' " �' .!o '11. I " �- '- -- - " -:. .;-- , _,;:;,!-,.. '1_7 411'1,11� , ` - �,.'_,,R.': 1, I , `, �4_',1?4 , *1 . - . .I , L � I . + I , , - ,- .11:�, . -v'�` - - " . � I - . �, -�,/v!�,�,��-.I"-,,.:"_:,,,�, , . , ., _ .- I - - - . - L, 1, _!, , !.""� �,4 7-,,A.�'. I,' I I , I. .. L . ,�. ," ., ��",. � I ,; . . . I . . � . . � � , - .,.. , . L ,; ��T , ;o,: I- ., , _, 't .. ,�-,*,�u:'q _ ._"j ., I % 1, I I I I -I I 1 1.4 ,.' ., Jr . . I I . . . �' .;":" , ,"k ", " , , ,��' _� .�,,,,`, -,,� , 0-, . r, " , %.I �' -"'�L _+ , ' :, . 1:, " ,, N ", I__ '� _�.- , I. -, - - � . � I - I. - I . . I ,�: -,�.' . -�- ,,'; , .., ,-�'L_.*�*, f,�'k .�':t',�-,I`�,.:o - 1151 q� - .,�� , -,f - - �'" I t k I . I . I I , .'- �, " I , -1.1 1�.,� .' " , L 1� � I , � . . . � -;-!' N.- -,,�,", � .��,. i, I- � I ,.,; I f. r �,Z" . . k_-A�., .(f - .' " � '; r. , .. . , ,� - �-� ;- �7. -�. "'. , ,, , . . � I - - - - ,,-�.(,Z,-"X.- -e,�' , 11 ,�" �" ,i' �"r�'�",,..�1, 1.,,,I_1 .� � " , . %, . I ". I �.... - I % _ . � 1 . , � 1, . � - -,�- I"" .I.-: "e � -, �-.. , , L � !.'�� , -. . �4, . ..- . . _- . - , I,� I I � , . � . I � . I lk-I.,,, -- I - III, - j :",-III :�"0_�'" j "I , --,-,_�,,. , ..,, .I',,i�I I, �.. , .-',;7 1 . . - 1� , - , , �, , " I I �N . . . - I . , , . I � r.,� � I w . I "L , �. . , " .� ', I,,"� .$�,_'r �,". �,� � . --s' , � . -I . � . I . � . I I . I ... ., ' .4_ I . �, +,�� . ,., � ,/5 � I � . . � I I + I . , ,-. . _ - - -- , , ^ "I --..-,% "I-","''; - - - , - ,I . _.I: -1� �...�_'# ,7 II �r_ -iI ,�,,',! ,., -.!. ': _ �� , . , - . . - , ; � , I . . .. ,, .� ,I... � �, � : ,:, - . .� . � . I I � � _ I , - :,. , ,�! - ��, � - I- � :,.�, : - - I - , I Ir % - -- :�'..T.,� 1--, - - . -, ` ," !��, �I� .,� .. . - - � � I I , I , - .r, *',/" . . ,1,� � .I" ) I � . : " ,, .; .,�:_� � ,�,,_,:..,,L.,:,:� 1. I-1 - I . �,,, .., - I - . k I � . L . � I . k ` .� ; .I ,; �-:2, 'I- _.- 1. , - " 1-4.j-,"r,�,_I0�i?�. ,;,�'.,.,�- .. , ,9-- _ 11 � I � - I '' - -4 , I . �, k , . , ,,!,_�,_ ,,�_. , . � ,.,�._,.",_� .,,,.,'.�t L.- . �, ` - -1 �I �.- , _ , , �, Z'�-4., � I � .- �,. - +�' " "I I . I r __ N . . I 11 . . I .� . , ,- ,1- I'.' - - . ,�, I `:'_'� �.�'1�1.I .11 I ,_-,>..�--� 4;, .- 1, . . �.,_ - I � ., . 't, , � . . , .j . , ., " .. � � , * . , , �,:.I + * ,;*"-, .-, .., - , - , I I I . . - � ,.�t',-�'.� "�.� ,-,;,. . ,;; I ,-; S -,, ,�-*.-.-,-,,-4 ,�,-,-".-�,, -'?�,�e,. , I �� ,� . :�� ., . '.'. ';� ,-. ,�,., . I L. '. . � � . I I , ., .k. ..- -, I ,4,",4, , " , - , I � , ,�., -Y '-T .,14 ,4 I . I I , . '�"",.�- .. L'. ,�� ,� .. I ,, , I, , I . -�,,t, ,- "I0. , ,� . , *,,_." ..".�., ," : ,�': ',:, . , " I �. '�,-, ','.t,zwr_. ;., . - . , __ , " I .1 I .I . �, - I .I � , 7 �', - _��.' L � 11 _,�_-,�.' �w"W I , - , � ... �, � I _F I"I . - -,,, -� II, � '." �." ;! .I . _"! - ,_ ., , .1 I .. I . I . I I I I - , ,��'r" I-,. -i I , "�,�kI A-1 'I". � ,� ,, I I . . -1 .1 , �,,',` , ,X " , . " . 10, , i .-I I., ._. . " tpl�. . " � _- . �� I ," .. , , .� .Ij , . I ------ __ I - I . I I * �, �, *, ;-.-I - , -,:,ii:"�,... 1� _ � I, .. .�;--, --1":1-�,,,-*,-,. ,,,. �� . �" � �.� - , . . � , I ., ".4-, , ", , . .L .- tp , � I � , .1 ��, �� --�,, , 'd,I "I I . . I . � I . I I . ,, r I I I I --, L I , _. I ,e r� ,,;'r, , I , , ,'��,�, -,.,� -�:I, �I I �� r "Ill'il��'ll'illill�,��ill�ll�I � .. �'. ,�� -� I�,;W -_�'-1 j:�,'�;�..!`,:,I�'�'L' _�,L . , I .1 I L . - � 1� 1�1 , � � .,-.. � " III F.- - � � - ; . I - . ." .1, � ^ - , - ,,,� `-,.`-,,.t,-,7"7*-�,-'-.:- , "r...-,�, 4� I �','!�-,-,��.,I,! . - �. � , '. r I I I -!,.',,., .� ," j -, I- .- I � I I � . I - . I 1 I., � I . :, , , . . 4 - . I 'I"I ";I�� - !, , ,.-, V, 1*11 . , - �-." , , :1'�`t" �.,*",�.�`� '�':-L?"',,,�,'--'"' , � � " , �, ".. .1 - .. I I . � I -' I \�; I I - I , , ,","," � , , ":,I-,,Z� ",_A,"-� � F - I "I, � '', . . I I I rA'qMMZN'r -li,:-�_,'� ,.-.- .. � . I . . I I � . � , ,- "I - . -r.- ."", . 1 , ,:' "4 � �.'-':,-1, 11 , I I 'I, , , . . . I I ,� .. � I � . , 11, I ��_':*"',�,.', ,I- _�� --I- , "',� I, 't � �>:_ � , . . . - "j_<.-�.,Jt�.I��` " � - ,,?,!.'_,4-" 1 " --, - ,I I;I:., __.,�."z'. . , ., . -1 �"Z�;� _,� I, _ ,� _-,-�� .` 1 4 . . - - . I 't � . � I � . j". . � I � . � � I " - , , ., : ", 1-11'.- I" , """"' ,,,,, ,,� , " ;,,; .� '" , , . I;- , , ,, L . - I -I;- I . � 11 �. �, . . �. � # _ :, - , . .- �,,,,-.,-�A I-!,e,�"., ,, " '_��, ��,, , , ''. - � - � : I , I I .I � . L ��` �',,%-,, �.,'_ �..� � _-, - I- 11��,��;,,...*,_A,r',,,.�f'. :,,, _4"'., , ".1 � , ,:--'!�, �, , - �, . ��, 1� .� I I�. :. " . I � . I Ili , �1. +1 I I . I .. 1.- I'.. . I , '. I . � - _ �,_� _'t1'1-�':1_;L_""e ";;"v,��:_,-,-�-�,,,,�k,. � . .-1 t�,�`�It�;��-, ,,-,. �I-, .,I ..�, I? I" N."", ,�'� -1 . ,.� L' � ' � � '."," L li, I I � � I- .�,.�- �, I , � I �.1. 1 -4 .1 I, - . . I - ,- I - -: i: ,,.-, �� t��I ,, � I_:�,I I � ,� t .. - "$L .- �� . � � :.:, I` ,* f . " , ., '.. .,� . . . '. . �,". . - " �._ �.�!"""n,, , ---f, .',��:�,,,,,,,�k� "- � L';;'1'!-' .- L - "I ,� , � . � I ., , I L- ", , ,�: 1i,4�_I'':�; , ;-�� ,7� �,,,�;7 , -1 . 11 . , .�'. ;, ,� "�,.�,,,� c". 4, .:., :,�.,,, .� � ,v - I �er: -, , ,, ,.- '. .� � , ."'. - . .1 . �. I . . '_ I�__�rs`IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . . ,4:� �"I� 1, - - � ,, , ., " . � , I , � ,:,- - - - , ,:.,,,�ft,lie',-�.�,-.,,N�"-,:;Z!.",!,��,--,-5 i3_-, - .. �, z,�; I " - , :� : ,-. - * , -,�-A. � -., . -.1 ., � � .. I . I . .- ,,". " I - -,,�� I . �� L I, - ,;,:�-,"- -"-: I :, . - I ,,.1 , . . - . .: IiI -� - '. " , ,: _4, - " -�..':,-.-i,�'- - �.-�.- +�� It ,,:lf),,�-�_'�� '' .�,, � �Z,�� -�.- � : ,,,� �,, � - �', ", . . , -1 � , I � I I - � -_ ,�,� ,I I : ;: � I . ,'�, , -,,I t. - -� � " ,7 . . 1 -4 - Z, I I 1, 1 ,�$,.,.-�, . `,�-�I. ,- I, , ", '. " L , , , . '_ . ,, ,*. � '�":,�--'�.�:',,_-4o - ., , L;7 -, '..", , �I I o I �, � . % . . . - . � . . � , ".7.".., , � �. .- � , . - . ,", -. I " '. � I 11 -k I,,%.--.- , -, �. ., - ", � � � . . . -i' � -, � , ., , __ :,,,:-,,,,. ... . I , -, , � I , . I - ' � __4�, '_- - ;,."'� - ��, .-.-- 'r, ,,,, . .*,, 'r� � � I �A _. ,� I , , 4 , , , - ,�,I�'.�,I I .% . I " , ,� , ,�.��,:�,:�,,i_" ,..� I ,, ! '"' . �. . �L- 't,I . , . ; , f , � , 4 , , . I.� 11 L"��" '�. � .I _.� , ) ,,,�*,'.;�`�,".-,, ,I , :� L�i" �.��_, I-"..- , - . � , I�., ; I I I - --:- ".I.-'; 1,tI._`,- � ,, , , I I,,r, '".' ',r . . . I . 0 -2 . . . , . , , I �- ., - . " r t � ,. L I I , . . . I . � .. I. , . ,, - . .I.1 - , .- , �I�.,.�,,-,`�,-,4,.'�,;_,.4-�� 2 , -:-t: " .1 ., , I - i ..., . ,�F,,"' " .( . I � , "L'.,.' ,,, ". . " . I.. - __ ' ' I . . . . � � ." -,i , .__ �- ,� i.;,��._-�.,", � . � ,,'r..,: I -I,.-; . � � �4:, I .' . . I ,. ' -C .;� . I . I . . - . - - � . . - -1 , ,�,,:�, _*._,"�i'..II.,, ,-. :�', __ `-1 I I�,� , � � �. , '. . .. I I . I . I . I..�, . � - '"��..1,;!.,,,��, ' ' , �.�, .�_ , , � "" + I ,.�, I�-:"_;�t:",, �,_"� . �'.,�,,��,�,".,:I�,r�_- ,,,-,'.�", �',T,, .. " L . � . I . . , .. I - � - I � .� I . I � I .." � I . � �),1�, ,,.,,,,� � , , ._1 � , , 1. .��. I I ,I I � .�, I , .� . -) I, . , , - , '. .��_ - __, .1 :I "' � �'�*, . ' ., �1'4' ,,^,*,-,;,"�:',�'..,,," ��-,.,, .'*, "" �,, �, - , �-:,:�, . , . � . .. I . , , I. .. , I 'I'l-". �;",:� �':% I !� : . , , I , , .- "I', , I -- i '.. C.- �, . . . �... �, I -y'. , I . . - . . t . - _ , , � , , � ,� , �. , � .. , .. _', � �,�- , I .., I � .. �'*' I"-"'"I " '."'� �L.' �,�:��, �"_1,,,, �*, I - I I z I -1 . .. � . - I - � �,� ,V,,4, ., , . . ,� .,;�i�. -. - � � I:-: ,", - � -� -- - * � I I .. , - �', . ,.`�""o,:":" ',,�',t,��,;.�`_'�'r I�'-,k i- _�A'.":� . .1 I I �, ;��. . -:,", -I. �. � " � . ( . . -,.�"71,.' -,i, it"T.", �`-,�:.'-,�.;7. " - - . � . ,,�� , , -�..'�, I . -1� ". - A "- - -'.-�,-.-,I. �� , � �_ L'-':I � " _� ' 11 I 1� , I � . I I , I . I . � , 'r . I. - ", ".:?I:�,f"f- .,� �"'.,��,� . ,- .,--,.-� �z. , I , ,.�I . �.''1.., 1! _ , +1 , � . � - �I. I . . � � � � ,: , 4__ - �Y;,`�,,,-, ,--, -�� , 14', '�;: *:,, --'4:':',, ., .4�"- ,,�_ , � .,- , ,;--.,, - .� , ZI:.�,-.1- - ;,�� '. - , -I. " I I � .. -I- . - � . � ..I - -'. � . ., z . , 1. - , , , "� ,;�X+ ;. ,� - , - " � 11, '?- '. ... I , �_ - --- -� .. I % . , , " . � _ �f.!.,.:, .-�:", 11. _", 1.-11 �,��,,,., I �-, ,� - -, - I I �, '. ., --�"� . I . I I ,. I . ,��; , . . ,\ I 1. -. , - , -,,,. �. � _ . - �, ,,�,�,111-'-,_ .'�' : L�- L11 _. "' !� r . I - . . - I I , , I , .,� .., � - ,I -�'*:, ._� `" �- " L - . . , pwr H 47 �I I . . . � � I I ,� ,,". � -.",�-��-"f - I .', �. I .. ..-�" .'', -, ..- .",� �_ - -I I I . . . I I , . ;�F.,,,'�:� '!,,-�7,`�,:;.�,.�.�, � , " . ,- - � � . - '. A' -, � , , il - , ,.il I -0ON I"�I , ,:-',,, . , " ,-, ,I .., " ,- , . 11* . I � . - . . C7 . . I 11 � � -1 1. -I I!,",�.� �, . . . � .;, � :, I, , �,,�,-�" .'�, I-��'"'," - ", '. I-" - , ;�7 . ' f . � . . . I � .. �I .1 . I -I ''..1.L;.. �,�!, I ��';:""*t',1',',�,,i,'..t ��Ij.l I,I , , _)' . , , L . ,� _:;�, .,I+��-".""�' .� L"L :. . . . ,-. I � -W ",.* �.-zz,,i'�I,. '.1 -1, ."I " '' r"' , � �,.. � ,. '! � ,.�,e".,,.'�-,. � �, -� I., i,�, -I,- -- -`�',, I _�, ,� A, �%,L_. � �, , ��.".. . � -- , '. -,� , , - 1.I_I - I I , .1 , . ,. I� �i,,�1.�. , , , � " �,�k_-,�, .", .�. .__.1,I-, _� , 'f'..e�, �' "I... "'.".`,�' L'- ' - .- : + _ , -, '.�, ,'- ,;, , ".:.. " �4 , , , L . �. . . � , , � ,.,:,. ;,,, ." '-, -0 -t�,'-,�'. -, ".,'.% - - :,,,,� ii,�,I.,,��tl "i-�. V- I I I I--`�.�.,-, ,� j,*.-.,.;, " ., � , . , - ".� �.-�.,I ��- � I v,-.,Ir �`�, , :,':,*,' C. �� , , 11 I � ,. - , . .�� . . . . � � 1, - � ..."1;:_ 'I, ,,,� � ,��,-":;-",",�,,, , - .'�*";.� '�,I(.,I,-� ' Or. . - ,_;I 4* `I -- I -.1-, " � � I I" , � , "11�'I ..! � .� , ,� . . � f , . . t - . , L I � " -. , ,�, ,;w , * -�j - 'A , �,,:"�L� .�_I I -" 1'�I. _. .r..3 "'... - - ,, -', - .t" ,j� ;,', 11 � , .. - - - . . � I . I . '. . I I I . I I -� - -� ) L T - . I . I . . ,. . . � I.1 \,. , I I.,� , ", �4'�-,��.'�,..',��-.-:.",, . �,I I � ,.+ -,.""!,.�-.',-,�," . ."""I-�,,�, t" �.".,C, , .,'�I.,- ,, ,� 'j" , . , �,,:.�,I r .. ?�;�'� ".)I ... , I I I I � - I - .1 I �%-,,. -, I� � .�,v.-- .'�-, �. ��,,,", , i "� . - I j�,_ -.:�,,��,�%,� ", _ - ; - ,, _ , . �,.,1-I ,,- I .3:. _ I - I I . . . � - � - ..::-,1,4�,�;- - _�- , .� . ,'.�i ,11",,� :.'r*.'t,-'I",�� ,;�'. ."-.':� ", , I I � - '-��'�""- ':�.' ��'' I'� L ;�.' _��' r . � . '�,�� -- - , . I . � , , , -" ,,, ., I -, , " q . _-;,:, ��" _,.: -,�-""._4 :�, ,�� 1, . '. � ; "1, I , 1 �i " �' L:, '�' -__�_ f . . . , . � �� __ . I I - , I � . - ��,.,, )I *;�"' , ,:, ;:-'L' " v- -.� �;-";.-,� L- -'>.-, � I -1 e,I . �L I� I ,�,� - , , ':1, . ,, .-. .� I, , - . ab �- .1 . I I ; .- ,:,`,�. ,. _.I;�, ,�,�:�".,." _.� '. ., , I .- , I . - �. . � - . . '_I � , I ., 11 I 1.i ", � . , - , ,z,: .� "'" I - - . a* _' I L . .% ,� `4 , ,� �;,* " `-, ,�;"),,t"-_,,,�,-,',,-.: t I,- 1-1� ,,,,L- - ,%.;�,�., ,r,., _ , 11, I - 1 , , - ., I I , ��w , . -, I L . - -, , -%*,,�,,-,_ ,--,,',�,4-�-,','-��"'I ,,�,,,,- -�, .1'if -.'��Ar��) J.' ., , " , ;, ,".� .. . � I � : _. " � . , .I I . � . L �,I.' t� I � , . 1.11 �,, " :_� ,,4 _ � . : - '. � - . . . a& I . _ � �._4. ,�,- "\ .,� .0"" - ,I "I" 5 ! I :, , I ,� � - ., I .1, . - � , � .\ I , I ",�)� . .� �,';. -. I,�,," ,-1,4 . � , ,:� . I. - K � I j `,� "!, ;r".'I 11, . ,,�-v , - - .- ,-�.-- - I _j- I- , .I f, L 1. 1. . I Ir I I. I 1, 1 . . , , �*�,- :.,�:'I "� I t�,v.- -',I,,'5�, " - "7.1, .-4.z f,:",A*.., I, ^'�"�vt, ,.. I L. I , , ... ,- . . L� I % _ I . II , , - , I . . ,. �, ,I C , - " I t�:..1, '' . , � �, _ -., -, """ '"" , �,., , I� ._I.1.�� - ,:",� . _ I - ) I , , \1 . I . - I � ,� ,. "�� : (-, -, �,�" .� .: -,;�,�"�T -et,�. .� .. 1. . ,I� ` ., " ;;.�� . I *, � , , r -.7 -1 I a �' I � .� � , ,�"". �, , , , , _* , I.. I __I� A r I I -___ . I L\ . ,L . - , I" , '. � - - -, .- -; _ I , .L�;"�,jr,,� ' �, , r� ,I, +-II L . , , .. . � . `11P � , , � , . I 'S"f' ' I � _,�. ��'�,., : I � I � , - -,,;V.�;,.�vl .,,;- � _ , + 'T'�,4 " , , .In w - � '.�, ,,,, , ,. �', 11,11� ;',� � I " I - � � ; � . _^+L �, . . � � , , , - , 'j, , , - , , I - . , ��,.; _. . I I I I - I I �- . � . I .. , . �� . ",j�, I_ .11 - , ", ,1 . , .� .-,,.,--,.-4 t - I I ; � f � ,, , . . I . , -, -I I � � - I �, I."I+ , � , .*-:', --- _�`�' ,'�, ,: . i . , , I�A .1 � -��,,,�,�,,* II, ', L ,-I. ,-`Z,!L'.1��, I , ,� . I L .- 4 I , , -,I� -4 ."; -,I:I C, - , �"" ' ' ' ' - - I I*., ��-P' :'_' ., ��, _ ., + ,--- 1 ��,�, '. '-- - _"_!1 .';�'' '','L _ , e; I 11- ' 1 '. ,�, . . 4 - __ 7.-�1 - Als.___I.�._ -6 H-T I-- F.011�1= - _-DF. , f �� , - � , , .,I- ,,, , " " ,� -��I�,�, , I , ,_ � , � �, .�, t? , _ � 11 I ,- t , ,_ T_ - ., -,�� , , " . . Al, _). - -=- .' 1��I C I I I � - �,,,,,��';'� � - , , , ,� , I �, ",-�k'�I ,j�: � :, __ L/ . - � :. ,.:, :, '..I .,--- �, � , I .I , , ,.I,. " _.h , . ':-I. � -,. , I, -. I �,r, .�, 'L' I I I - , , '' ��,-,,-r,II I ._� �; 11 � lir � , I I _�, I � , , , � '' I � ) . - _ " � ! . , . 1. - � - � + - - vl_$ -1�1 :.P.. -,.�%:,,. :-, ,� - " I . , , -�., f - . I "', I. \ .. . . . Iv -� ,-I, ,v, , - , .. ;; - I. , - I _`,�_ - 11 - ,"..,1,- - 4 . _.�",z � - I I . I . . � ' , L - , -1� , "-%�,..vl . -�,'.,,,-.� ,�, -,,--' ,".: 11" _; �_.I� L , " ,, ,f., 1-, - '. ,I�_-,� : -� -I. I .- . . .. L, ,. ,.,,I",\, _ �'._- � I ,1.-� . ; ", ,'.'I o-L.....'4 , I 11 ...-1 �4 , "Z' �,"7 '�'�.�r'.,,__'_�",__�r I'I, . I��I '%,11, , i".,.�.. -z . , , -��",:.� , � ,*.1 ! . I I / . "I I I , , . , � , -"', I , ,, , . - 7 11 1,I I , . ; -,..,., ,"'; I " _ . . - . . , �. , ,_.� ,� , _ �. .: '. ;� , I . , . I, *, � �� - �I, 4 1 1 , '.."', ,,:� ,.,',". .,,,, �'�*" , . � , � .. ,, . . , I,,,.; , , I . �I . I , . . "j, Jit�,,�',��..1, ; I - I I I L I �. , I - �. _ - , , � , .�.,,, � , .;';.-�,T��,�� ". `,,'.-, 1 � -�' 'L" I _. I - �., I � �,, "� - ,.,, .^IIT-��.�.,0 ,!. , , .-- ,I 11 I -.A . � .1. " -, :,. I 'I`11!11%1 .:-'_14 It;__ - � '. - ,* ,v, I,,-,�� -. ,�.,.. . , --I , . - . . ,.,r ,4 - . 41 -1 1. . .- ; I �. .- � . I I I . . - � .1 k - , � . "t":1,I,,.,. �� " - � -- L . -f .'�', ' �Ij""'-'":,"'I'�,+ f',�_ -� 11 . ' _� �14 r '- '.*,".", ,� ""1�' , ,..-,±",' - "T"-Z:4�,..I ' -',! "_.,`�� ,a"*�.., �,- ,-., - - , .. '�'� �. ' ' ' - .. ' '-.+' ." �,� ,_� ,,., , ... ,`I�� - - � 1�:�711,��'�4�', --�", '�.��', ,*- '� I � : -, I, " ...�-:' . I��,�-,k:,�'-.r-,�. � , . , ._ -, , I :� L ; I I l- : I ., . I ..;, 11 .11 / I ... I . .� . , � " �, . �_, , , I '. . �, . � , . ,� � ,�. �. - �_ �, ,� ,� ,�-+_ ." , . ., . - . - �-_ �.. ..-- . J � � , , -� .I:��Z.,__1"'. , ,:, ,%..-6�,��7 1_--I _,*� ,,i-,,,:,�,'� �._,�,, ,4,I ,,-'�?",,',�-,,�;,-,! I., ,�, - I 1,� , 4, �. 1., , : I . , u . . - ., , i � . � - I . � �, � . .11 I � , ,� I� . , .* - -�, -�, �, ; I- ,. ,tk -I '..,- '. .�, - . �. .� , �. ..xu . . , ' ( - - . "' I., -, � , _,"j-1: -, I , �i � .1,�� . . -4- , 'i, .. . I � I . � ___�_.�_ 7___- --- I I' I I . � I I�_I, I(�-� ,I , . � . , , . I - � t , ._ - �:: �- , 1 1 � , -� .;, . . - � I � � ,,�.,: _, _, ,r, ' * - �i� - . �" .?".'.,"-!1,-I,,,,�," , I �, - . . I, I .,:, I I , . � .. I-I- � I . " , . --L e,; � I I� I , . , - *�" _." � . . ;_;�, ", ,, � , . 4 - I � - .1 . , .-�,-,1;1, ..? ,10- , - �, ,�"h.1 .� I -.�!I",� ,�',,� ( � � , , . * , , . , , . k .� . I - a. I, I t -� , f.,I ;,�, � �', ,�, ,,--" ��_I .:- I�, , , , -, -, . . . . . . � I , � . � �_'..:,_' ,'4' r)1'�'-"_ _ _;r�.'�' ' - ,�' 1.4 � �,:._� .�,!A�, f'j`-"',",-__.�'. �," , L� ' ` . I , I 11 r 1,. . .1 . . . � , - , - I I I - . I� . L I . ,I , ,I .1� , .`,1,, - I .'��.-:.- .�*-1 'LL I� ' , ' - ,I,.4� ,-", .I. I I -"'s .1 ,,--,�., .,-, . I - � I . _ �.7'!��.�."�'.-I. '�t' '., � �,''.x � -,Z�,,i ,*4":. " � 1,I :, , '' � . , � � . - . . . - .�, . -%� ,, I�,, , , _:�,_!�,*-",L,��.I a', �,:�, , , -.,,, .: , . � , � , , �I I , -v � � � � � - I . . .. ,I � , . I I :.,- .'� I I . .. . ,. _ ,� "I � ,4. , , . �,,�", 4 , . V, �T - " �, I, r I , . __ -P � � . , . - " ,, _ I 11 1.I - �' I- ,,�", ": -..��!� zj��'1!k ", - -- , � , .` , ,�._� ,I,, .;, , � *:I:-- �- "'. , � I III--, ,�,;___ , . . , .,- - '-, , ,- - , "' .'�,� " 1-1 .��.,-e�_. �� , �-�'" , � ",*1, 0 1 . I ; . � ,. . _- I I � I.. �I .: . ,'�', ,� �, ,, -, , , 1,__' � _.__�, 1$r 1 . I I__ f � I , - � ,:, �., � , , ,�. , '.. ,� ;�r:� '..", ,1�,, ��_11111_1_1, �, .,4,1:,'.�." * ,�,", . -- - - ", . ,, .,,.,-�** �,,., ..:j,�.., - '. . ,, I I I � . , . . I � ., 1, 1. . . I ,::�w,,., � -- "-,. . ,., - �.-!� 1� '*, I ", -�' :I,�- . t I - . . . I ) � I I . I I .� �� 4 - ..,,-,� 1, , , � ,,,- i'-,�I-*,- + _' � I , , , " '�' I '-W �.!_ �,-j'�./,-";L, .0- , �:L+,_1,��i� -. - , . I - , I .1, I., - I; . - " , .- , . : � , -- k,4*t-;'- -t�,.. --:,,"1;,,,,.,''�,,, I ' ,I, :� ": ,.,,,. � I " , .-,.� -A-. �., .. - - �� ; �� .1. � -` - ,'i� e. " - ' _,� ._ , , �, �.� � - I �, , . . I .. .� - � - �Ir _ . :�!��1'�d..�.;.11 1, : , " I- . . � " ": ,. - ' `f"` '" '�,,::.... ..!� �',,, , , :- _ , I I . � . . I , , �'r� I , I ., � ":�.11 -:. :.��",.,: .,. I- ,k " ! , , � , O' I- I - - � , , . � � I �.... * ,I I, I ), ,. ,. I .I . I I. ,I ,*.� . .�I� I 1;.1 'r : I . . - - - , .� �., I. k� ,,�,,�_::�', '.�'�.%j�� -k, ""L�� , �. , , __.o�I .I � - A ,� 1 � ,.r)',: �, " _�:,i_�',� -,-," -.."" .-'.,. ! ., :." � , li, , 1 , 4 C,: , `-`,, " - , ,I ,., . . - I I 1- ,- . , - - . . � . . I . - , . , I ;-,,:�,"�j �" _,_* --� ..O- � . � I � ,_� , .. . � � �� .,.,: '. ":j", -.L;�.,�*; '77, ,-:-",�,:.',**,.��'�;.-.,� � , �, . � I ,. .- . -I P . � I 1. ., I ,��_��",^ -",""..'A L:��, I I�%,�.,'; �:",-,:" - . - -i. � - .1.*. .: I. I I 4 . � . I - / - I/ . � . I . . I' , , .L � , ,� t , ..,�, 'r� " 0 r, , I � , t,41`�, _+ . �; � . I . , - ,.. .. , , �T" � 1,I �+ L.�II..�,I . � " ,7�*. " , �'."i.,_L,e I . � ,� _�.; 'i I _ . I I I . I .I , . - , 1�:,"", � I'- ..�� .:_ . ,, , _..:i, .- . I -r :_ 11; , .." , _, I . .�1; - �: I ,� ., � 1� - I I ,I - , , I4 . ,� , ; , �I . . I , I I I I , / . I . . I � . . . , , �- . ,-`,*., 1 � , , ,;--o,",.A` -, ,!, . ,� .," _.. � , ��: ,4 . . � I . . . ., I . . � , I ,i� . . s� ., . "I I '. .�%' , �,;,,- P , . , I ! , __"., 1 4.�,� ., I - 11 -1. � I 11 . I I �,�,�., � - I!-- . '... I , L , � L � , L . I .. 'I 1-4.,." 1- _4111�1 11. .11, :" - ,",_, ,... . . I � ., . .", ..r �"""._'A-I''.- ,-'1;, " " .1 I . 11 � . , - , " 7 -11, :! " 'L . I,y�" � " � I., , - ., _ ! I I � , ,f, . I � . . - I I , � " I � f,,, 4,� '�_`, .,_, ,, I ,, �, I , 'I _��,:.�""" � � ." i.,�, - ,�,*, ':�,.'��;". : � r,�. I . I - I -, I_ - . - I I . ; L)l - , - -'� :, 1,14 " 4� . ,,�� " '.' - , . '. � .I - I . � -,__" .. 1� '�� "I _. , 1- . , � _I., ," I 'I: - I- �,�--,-':-�' �1 `w, ,�., -.-, , - , , - I I ", , _.. `:,"%L�"`.,`� . " _I . , . ! ,", , . , , _1 , , .. , . , k " -*;� -,-.A�,, �,,, , � ,:, �� ..4. _1 � _.r, _r.,*�t � !�� ;,� , 'A �� L , � �- .. . ,I I - _� / , � � I " t 4 - . - I . _ � .�,-, -�:', '1_�_.;"_.' L-'_�,`_ '; ) j-', ."�', �' , �+�,� , rI '� .11 It J,I ". , ; ,;, If I _11 . `4t ", .�,, , I 11 ., L I 1, � . �.- I, I � , . I ;�,',11 �,,,ii., �,� � i� . I . I I �I I , : ., . . I 4L " � � �'� .�,�'� -, - i- _* �. . I I - - 11 11,4 .1� . ., �� ,.,�--'-�, --l' �,�, " . 1; , I , 4 1 � , " -�:, ,,,�'�`-,i�%.I,',7��. �:��-, I . I __ ., . 11, . I I. I . . . I � I I . I� . I I I . ?. - t .';,.; �I I � � .� �. . � . t 1. - � . , . .. , � , , � � � .. . - , , ., � �'..'- ., - ,_�� 1-fl. �111 I .1. . . , 'I. � '. "' . I - . \ - '.1 .., I _* 11 .. .:, 11 , - ;r,_--t,,�,4'r,,,. � , _�;��,� , A . I . � '\ , - I� , . .- - . :1 - , ;, �� . � � I 1 . , I .11 I I . , , � - , . I ,� ,V ,�jw I I , , , ... -.1 _ ,I I I , . - . r I .4 1 . I . I .I I � .. I ,. - . . I - �, v", _-i� t,: ,,�,;_ ,� ��,� ., I `" _ _�, - - , " ,I I . -I, -- - - . "i- A. -1 � ---t- - , I ,+ ..- ��4 - - ..,. !r , , . , .,�L(, . -� .. . . : I % I ( � , . ._ 1, , I *,4 , - . : - I 1-,� ": 'I I . - ', 11 _. � , � �. I� . I r, .. -�,,�,i'�,.' �,,�,-,* , .!g �, 'r �,.-. , v _ � ,.:,-,h7.#-. -1, `� r, ":��^,:,�- +e�_'.�,i . 11�'.. :� -4�IiIP�xl � -,Z,1��_�� -, - �,,- 14- .,., �-,- - . , " . . , ,,�t,', ., , � I .,�.I,-ti,i,.� I .. ,,, .1 \ I I I I � - � � I � I .1 I �` e � . i, ,i:. ' ' ,,, _-",L,�;4 '.- '. , I I \ '' . - , . I "I P I- , I- . ! . ,I � - I . I - f' � � I , . -� , I .. ., - " . � - , I . .11,:�,�, , . ., . e,.J�q, .,', 1_ . � I �L . � I . . I r L � . . --�-- I . .,S: , - , - --.I.. .. � - , � ,� , I�I ;";., � I I , . I � � - _ . . . I ,,, -I �. *_"..,v :I*�.T r � � I��. "',i_�� X- , 7�,'. I � ; �;,k,-;r'�"� !�,'?�%�;x- . , ,,, � , . 4.� - .. I . - :. , I I . ., .1 - "I r * , 1, " . I � . I . � I I . . .. '.. . I , r.�"_., .-.c - ;t � - -�I;- -, I ,�Z, -� - " _��)�� : :�":, 1.' '. , L:� ' �'�1, 1.�- I ,�� I r ,rl;�� ,,�- ' * , , , - . I . .-;'� , , I , . � I . . . . - T, � I 1�1 , I . . - � � . - � . I , : : I - I ... t I o � I , . - I. `- - '11t.PC� - � I,, +� . I I L � �. . ,,,�'.� ,,,�,,� ,I,-- , 1"'.11,11�t"'J"."' _ lt'� �, ' .." , I ,I, ,-1 ,-�. . . i, -, , 'Z,_!,--,'�..,�',.`:"_..��::�, - "', '.' " . _�__I I . . 'L - � I . . . . . L I, , '. r!, , ,, � . . . I . � �, � 11_;",�' !4i"'. 1, , _�_. I�,� .., ,. , 11 . .. ,., . . I _i , , ,,r". , �� .,:"',2� !�', ': , A_� -1, '. 1. I , � .. , , � ., I .1 I � 1. . . I �I ? , . . � I :'� -� . 741. , . . I . . . ;1 � � ' ' . , *- 1'. t , ��": - I I . � . 1, � � I . . . if I ! . ' r .. � .. ,,.�� ' �r_ � -, " .. ::�",�,- �'4 -1 .1 . -- , . �� ., I * - - , � � - I , ' ' L' .. � .111. . % � _'. I I , .I. .;, .." . . ' � I I . I , .'. I I k, . . ��.L ,' .. . . � I- - - �-".� � I "I 1 ,111�', ., +_ .11" 1. . .. , - . . . r . . L I � L I , __ I � ., -- I L� -jrg'; ,�*,,��,��_l .;"� � 1. - . . ", I r I 'N , , , - I � , "� I I . � .1 . .I � � ;. _-, . ,01* /11 � I ' I I I , � .I � , I. - ,, . � , - I - I ;,,�! - L�,.4�to I + , ,,, - -, �� - . t."14'. , I � � I - . % " , - r,�-!�' �'_ ._�. I I" -" .., '. -_,',.�-.- .t. �I I I , I� -7 I ,.- � .- . . . ,, , �, . I, . . . � I *1 .. - 1. .,L� . � , . .. I ' - . ' I . . . I . I : . ., I -, I . . I ,,r,, . ':-, .�, .... I ",_ , , , , -,�, � � _�r� � ,�''., ._,, ,:r_ - �!,�.__1�11, . .�� , I , ,I,� I, �+ .,.� . � I I I � 11 - " , r '';. , , :%-', �.., I �. ......��1. , I� I . � , " 1 . � . .y � ,d ". I 1..'.�.� . .. ' ' - , . �. . � . � .* ,: . - I - I - "_I", . 1 .,7". . �!� �,4", . ,,� 1�,;-_ , 4� � � , .1 -� r , 1 -:,`:� � I . - � , �: " ' I I I"'' '. . ,� "i I , , . 1 " . � -� . . I � . . �. _ , � . I , 11 I I ,.� 1, I %I �1. -11: , � I - , I L - r 4 - i , , , I . " - . - � - I . - I is"i I I � t I I I I I I Tj " �:7; 1 * ,, 1. � - � � �r.T�,� - I11J__ � . - , , I ". - I r . + I - , - I I - � k� k ) I I I 0 I - I I I I � - ) I I - i I I I I u I I' I 11'� I I I I - 11 , . - . _, . , . .1 I I . . � I I I . . - I - I 11 � � � , I I w mi. III Ism, I- -,__�ill . 1".I, , . --L- I -) I - � �.1I,-- ",., 71 t . ,� ,:1. + � ,� .� - , , , .,� , 4 i I I I . I , ;� , _ �� - -..,*'�,--,�-,,�;I�,-,�Z�!` I - I 1. ;.. , ,. � - .� \ .� , ,. . ., .� -, , ," . ... . _ - -4 . . . I - .. � I � I I .I -, � , , I '. : + I I I . I . . - I:, , " . . �,, 11 I . IT I � . .�,' +'" L , ' . .,�, I-*; :f ." � , �?. , . .�, I- ;-, . � ..�-�,.,..I-a t., "-*r .._1 I w_ o�, ,�_::, `1, `�',:'�'.'L "'�" I "� " "�-��. , , r I , 'L : , .. I , I z , � .1 !, I I ,. L .. , I le _1,-__-_; I-- I. -T, - _", __ -, �-- , � s;;sosII. 71 I I -I z . " . I-, I . I I . I , � - Ii, , I �iii", ,:' !. I -, , , -I :; , �T,. ,".":, , " ,',� I., � I � I � , , , -- .,-- , , . � ,,;e" , I ,,+�,1.� , , :� ��, -I 4�,:� :�--�-,�, '" __ "- . �: . - I - 0_11 "pil_ -I isaw "Imi Wes- - +_ -___,__,�� T��___ . , " � , � : - - -, ,, -1- . .� I us "I P", hi ,i I.4o I I I I 11, 11 .1 �_.. 4 1 � . I I . III*4�, "r - - - I .., " � 6.*- ;�ft; ,III . - -I . _."'. " .f" , ,,�_�_,1�.'1, .- _!� 1, . - Ir . I � I I . I � p � I .I �11 111111-1 I w ft _� i 4 1 I ..-- _�_ , � I'� I � I I I �1, I r- 11 . . � . .- , .�1. I 11 I� ..'r. +_ -1 � �� 1.1- - .' '�� -1- � �.-- I' +-, � ��_ ,_ -. I— ----I--____ __7 ,i. -_ - _- ___ -I- - - , "-, "-, _ ,,,-"_,--"-_ ' -11' '-' - ' " --'-' -_ - - '-'---".-- _ '-_�- -�. ,_ -11.-.� , � .--..1 �, .r .� v, ,-__-. -�,'' "�-___,"r.-..- � i I i * ,�' . �.,-, 1. - I - I . .1 I , I .'. - , I, , , . , , _r. ,__ - � . , , , . '. � - . 7' !�1_ - .�. I 11 11 11 _,�, ". �11.1111_4" -,,,,-� - ". ,� . :-L., ,. �. , , ""I"'.;". i..�ik , . .1, :,' �"'_%' �,� �'-�', ," t ." �.�...� - -11,,,je 1. . ,� --;, .. , . --.--I- '�I --_-:.�i..1",:' .-.,:�I� . - 1, , _-', - , J_6 _ ,�� , .� ---,- " """1, _", , - 1".� ,"I.. �, . . " �. � .__.... -1, ,r.rl,� ' � . .,�;t4,,*r "�j ,.�, I I I � I � -, , � � I I , .� -, ,,, I'l., I 1'1.� .I ., �'�,.., * . , .�'. I_,_.';I _ - �, !�, '. " , ', � _"�,iL " r,,, , 1� I j , .-�:,�I � 1, ',:,�-%�_`f�,';.,,.,I��7 ,.�N JI, ..' 11111ift�,,'_:�_ ___ *"f� ,_,,-,�';_� �,� _ , � �, .�- . . � - - , -� , - � - - - � 1-1P�,- �71.-,I , _., , _�� .�,:., , " %,:.�A , I � I � . r . - .._� _ , , . - � �1% - , - ,_%'III*-F,,4-.,." ��';'�,,�%;-+.,�,,�",---','-iI�:- _, , .1, 'i �. - �4: . . ,:, , � r . 'I � . ,\ .. .1" 4 _: , ," ',L-�, ,, I, -1.- � I -, , . �", �t - �L ... -,.:��'..f_ _ �Lii, ,�:I�,.�_ - -,� " -,�-,"� :. t - , - , , " . " -, I � � � ; I .-,*��. r , ' 11, ; .. I �, . I I I . 1, � . . I -, -, � __ 'L, ��,'L.- -,� - , ��_.�. 11 .� _'. ;, , . � 1.�, � I ! � I 1, , I - , - : :,,*,��?---A, : . . . � " -� L .". _': - . I - � , I_1-1_ .--_ -1"______- - � ,�,. " ,��__;�___ -i- I - .. - � ' I ., I � - - L" _-, . . , -'-1L-- � .-_ -"' ' �'_ � ,� - " . � I - '� ' �. " �, - � - I -1. �� ,,,,` � , .w� -,� , , � ., , -, � -��.,.'-� , , . - I I � r . '' � ' ' -11 7* k-41-:1,11 -11 , , - .,�% .I I , "L ' _. I . . , 'I � ;r, I , I 1, , , I -� � _%,� __�; �_ __ _ ,�., �� It, - F" , , _� _'... , - _- -I' 'y "',,-I r -,.. I." ---j L _ �, -�" ;'' , � ,� .., � ': - - ,�).. _?.,- , �1'r,� ,(*r,.,., , , . 1, I I ,I '. ,�I,.', " , ."��, , 1,,� , . ''�. , " "t- _ , I, -. i". ._ .Q, I- , , , - �.,.. ,. �. ; -"' :"-'I� -' _L'Ir� "-.-' _* "' ": ,�,�,�- ,I." �1 , :Z.-..:��: ,.:,,,,-,,,, , __ , I I � � I . ��.;, N- f "'! . -4,�j , ?, �:., �,�, i ,,, � ., , I-- , 1, -1 . I -1- "If "�.��',i,. * ' ' -1 - I , ,�_, ..��`* �- . , -, . .�� - , I a . ,_".!�, -, -,�L __ I � � 'I . , L � I' - '. I.:'-. L -, _ ,,,..7 , 71 ,.�_�_ ��_ L. - -,,1. '. , - -,,--._N� 41 , , 'cl 1- , . . , I . . ",-, I ..-- , , - - I �� I--\�k."., � -,,j �,'j�t I.,."(,., ,A,, , .r -. 11. * �# ,- -� . , ., -, " I '! -.4," � --, 'If' I , ,. _ �� f.� ,�_, , , ,."I ., - I , ,2 _: ''.,I � : - -, I ,� , I. "', ,, .. � , , ,I I , �, - -, - � _ I I � " - . �. , -" , , j , I I . !�,,j�4-,.�, V,,,\ --?- � " *.,j---�., ,;� .%,� �, � , .1, �I'll- , i�� , � . I - - _ , , - , . - . , I � 'I i:11 � ,".�:"T ,�". ,,� , _�t �. , _ _�,,+�. , . ,��,, . , , It If 'A I , 'I , � 1, � I .. .1, .. I `,_ � .., I, . ---. - o'.Z. �' - �, , .�-- * -" . �'. �r..' ,, '., - .,- _1�, T,, :�..�,.�,-, I I.,�, I I ,'( ' .-'�`.'.7,',' , ",',�-.. ,i� , ' , ..*-1,4: . , 1. 1� ,�f , " , I ,;' . .- ,- + � I , ��,' ._� '.1 1 �A J,.�-,,,,"t�--- .,�,,i,�,�,�,',�i�,,,j".�'. I, i. , .� , , ,;,,;I .� �, , � It, ,.' �I ,( � ",�,1�"" . ", I ;�,., � ../7?."a,""'.pl&", , �,�-.- , ._�,� 'y I . I �,I!�. ,:-�,:,�` ,. - �, I I -.�:%, I '. , _, ... ,. � , _ _ , I V�� , .! - � "- t,,� � -;� ,-�,-Ill'�-,; �. � ". � , , I I � ,_ . , . � " I I . , ,,z - I I., 'I, ', ... �� , ... - � ; II�"t, I I I I � I!,.4 , ,� ;i _�,-,.r4 � - � I � __,4.�,� A .,�� ,. I I I .__," I r 11, +�, - !I . ;* , *!%t.1 t " -e,"-. � ,�-, " , - * , . I ,+. .: ,�1 " - -.., , . :, , 1� , �, .. I- , , . � - , , , " �!.1�.� ' , _ �:, . , , I ,� � , - , .14� --1.�L.�%_%� � . ,,;��!,j�_, � i.6,,'� , -I;: --, � -I� w , - 1� � �4,1"� " L ", .,t Z �'I , ,,� 7_11.11�', .,I ,"",.-�I'.� ! -�" -Z, I � ,;, ,�,"'"..I� -�j,,�',', '��,,�.',�,,,.�\,�' I*' "� r"�, 1, Z I.. �_.",A, " " .4,e, 4 � �� . � "� '.�', � ''.1 ;,` ;, , , � - � 1.�� r'..'�� ,- 41,:7�-�,;��c-,:.�;,.� ,,,",,'4 ',,,;�'-,,, , ,�� -,-, � ,�� .f,"i.";�� . . , .�,� ' ' , I I--, , y : �;r � ,.*�'I,_"�:'j4 7 , , . - � - , ,- I I - .4� , -�� "'., .. , , ,I,,�:,� �1` 1, - 1: ;F . .�� - 1�. *�L.",.'�'.,�,,:�. "4�:i��--"' '..�'.'. '��'�'iL''�'.'I��1j"�� " - , . .'' I- �,,-�, ..�",! , " _!Z:*j,'A-. . I I � I , ., , , � � N - �, '. ": I -11 I � -_� r, . , ,_ - . I 1. �� '_I� . -,�_ - , , "el ,"., , " , - k- - - .,� �, . _.. 1111� . . , ��, .f�11_ � I`< ,��, _� , , . ., ,� . ,,, , I I , .: _1� . ,� , � I ,� - �_-.+, - 1, . _ I " , , , �, I � -1 ��,'V �'�1 �,�,'�,% , �, ,._1 - -v� , -+,�:r , _ 1._ , -,I-'44' '. ", � -T'+i�'_ ,'- � �I'P � '+_* i '1:.:� --`��y',._,---;I! I ' 't , - I . � � 1, �_'i:^: " � I,,, , � ,6Ik--__ '-:7t� _ _� _!�r:_,, ...,..�,L�,. ,-� -, -',_ I � � * L- � ��:� III&,,�,, - ' '- _�� _ ;IP I ., - '.!,A4�_'� : ;..' � -.4" L "', _ ' �_'.'��,' ;��"- :�_ .- �, �I � , .1 _- .__ ..-�- - , I � � � 14� __ I N�:.�"I!�1',_.11�1-,.', ,�,,�,,��,�,- _: , - , .; ..,,�-, ,,;,-; _�,t V L"-"-""L,�y�',,.��.,,-�,,..��., � . I Y,_�,�I t , � � I - I , , ,� - I I .. , 4 � , , , , � �"?,r."� � � , , , , _ _ ,� Q4,� � . I.- . J,�: , � , �. , . r, : ). `� . , � -� __-,-__,_�:� - . - - --1-11''. �_, - - , ., - , J - _,�_I.- - --___ - - - . ...-.-,-,-L I--------.�_----.----- .--------,----__ _ \_� �,_'' -I .I ___,,-� , ,,--r.;.+r- -_'.u�iZ�_iI. _ _ Z -1 '_ - �� ___ - u.__ � -�-1 v 1',�.,:__2�,-� 'I I-� - --1 ------L - _1�� .% , __ . � . --.�� w 1- I -.--. --�- - - . . � I- . I I � �I -I... -I 1-. .1 IL I - . - . . . - - � - ^a<.:..•_ ,..-..e.,... .........,...,. ..a.._,.u»_,<.,.ee...... .»_,..•n,,.:,r,:e.mrz...,_w.,:::.-„.+a....:ceas,...,w,....,..x ....usa w:mxv.wx.z.:•wxew,-.,'..,•r'w Ku..,.s+r y.. .,. - .. -'_ _ - .,.. --._-.._ --..•._t. _ - -- —. LM T c .�.,,T �..�p••3... L..r, "R,sT •""r ©'= ice',f_.,, ''J';.3 - 9OMNI S� t'S-- To 8,Sol . s'T► �T t I N Q 1 75 Ya Cr 5t 5.2 2, 3 - O ;f'_O'I 2►O O',0 a N L (bG x}.07 t f V c 4,51 LM YvrAL ,t_ li Ott I II � E TC7"' p�= R: Tf►.ININrJr WA:rI. � o , I Ec.. vr.Rj';5 Cf,did TO lO.,�✓j � v l t 00 To Cl-00 Ln Ln d t � 1=1 4••9! , EL_ 4. "11 e'w 4.a153 U E 'D E:,.. VAS'?l�,4AI N!t•'3� �r'/�L L,. TO 1 O 0 O � � �c � E. L 8 . ?o TO 49•SD c c N+ 1 N ! E ' .. E L .'rj,�� EL 3•-18 &A” OF' PFJ • ' F •' D IAT r Lon-o . - �'� �''�� FI►� F',..�. �:.,• 10,E 1 j EL- 6.00 ' t .4 , • el.. 3.05 �•�, TG 3. 38 �_ °O �G� do o 4riw F 7 Q Z � Z ® - O L - s t ' • 1 x /b it a { KING C� a 1, r U Y _. U1 , E( i u) It`,-r-T )rev-. t� rc q o0 _ 0 Mitt, 4.30 ;/--A . I g, �" :�•.� IL ro ..0 = --- ' ¢'CR7 �•�ov .y-0}J FIN,FR LR EL 10• 1 j � ' �` i � , _ �•'.� �� f » .. . .. ^- `'' '" � a _ a _� -- --t- f - 19 • GATCN 97A�NS: AT i cam" j �` P 9 �o f � ( �y _f� , `rNJF,�`1a I I + I F • LDvr.��, POthJT F � �Pct_ty � � i .,.' -` \ ii 5.20 .1 h — �--" 'F'G2 4 57 ;�"�......j ► �_ ` ( 1 �t- 6,00 4- 415 qo13 U. } 4.71 } � ` � � � _�__ _� -._ —_� _ _�.HG f G � /•� 2•�'C•�Cr"p l ' i � 1 ' ' 1 1 ! � •# 3 EMPR Tc r000 ..� ".rr'- � ` _ti � k`�C— •-----•--- -- - t •� lA4- --, ""-'•"__•..,,,�'cP�DO _ � - �--, �`/ DF:I I '. � � I � c � � k ir,r ♦ ,' L `•, !�:f• { t 1 .� I - C C>^T:w i ! ( 1 , ! 1 :A ;r a s ,. , vi ;� � , � ;\ *^W 7.�to x'7,40• /li � '!i -�r�'-°'i 1� c �€ .....gym. ' y�r .- -e. - ' - __ -.- - _T I F \, ./ - - -; r' !-- •t_' - _ �r,l�`� _ QyCtga,/� 5_.`!-UP A!3� j- .�O -•....' r I �� • p�� ' f lu. .. s"I r•��.�• ,ts'j=r --�----—: �� '.��'� r • ! - I I i i � _ � } � � � i ! � j ; '' � t :•' ` MASTREET i5 t4 {S•3g ;5 �2 � tom•?tl. �� . �t F I i � j i � i � I � i - � _ ¢ °10 .. _ P L-A'r F v RPA :k � � .:r_. .,..�,,...y»_ -^ ._..,_ ,. .- ..:.sem_„_..•......__. r _._ \J�-\✓ � •n-+-- ✓�� _-�- , 1 � ! ' ! ! ! � � •-_! � 1 , + I { _ -� :. y ' N t'• 'i t I ".� '�1-1 S� 1�� Tr, A-. {� a A-.(00t' �� I 3 , �✓ �•�47 � p1GGy �� '�} • pr -� ' Tw \7-7 T` ii lJ 1J I ; > - i ; j � - 4``y. �j•••�_r-•+-ELS' /� �I' � 1 - � � °' ; UR ' � i�• � � �`� f• � � �,-•••.,,�-' ` j 1 i (U�t. -'- -_...}.. -,�,__ . TG 9-C ' f'a�'U`•(I t�,�... T t P�►' � E .f . t + A-p1_ =.4�r 'j�.:-+ .._s__ ._ _ : 1 ., ! I I ✓f ,� _2 eze•5 FRC P c L o V ^ TJ t r -ty j 10 cip ..nn,r r_o�} '1 1 ✓ it i t t # o I i III' L= - _l _ ___ _J ,� + I o„ wr, � ,viF _� •._ ..t��*tT a' -- - - -- " -- _- - - -- "_._..__. � . ...L-off. �'` _ _ - - -- -- -------- --_- I r F T r 1 G Fes.A .) 3�0' ati ! r L»"�f,r�tIr►1 � : "r 1 - 9 - - - w �T K:�"r 'C. Rd•s- �� _Llao. r.� F •�� 'P !�/-� � , _ �"- _� I •�.�i\ice: . L.I I�"� '.'..,,.I� - � ,mt "i F O 40 .»........................r,.,........ fJ IQ 1t:t;) -.C7 1-2-S3.9� 2.�1 �T o TV, S"G70 p $ � � �� 1n S �' ----•E_ B.00- - .. • P�?n p4a �� CON TOvR:v Er3oe� U) "� 1 \ I `O LEr►GHI�G Pte:_ Wj 6G..ia GpvL�s?� l + (0) • LEhoN1�-1C� Pi7�i. w� p!eP.IN INLET. ' , # _ � + 2"40 � � Pio�:�:�� G/.�.'r">✓t-t ��;;;r^� ` Mom TW WALL . Ul LL o� Oo �G - P,�TTOM 01= GONG CUG.�i h , J• a1 TG TC7'r`' Or- CONG CURf> f _ a! F - f 3 00 • E<;,TIN c3 c��ADE E�EN�.TipN a ,�' n1 NOT a DRAIPJACBM ,G A l PLAN t7j TM1 P=%AW1Nc"n E V:ateC7 IN t 1'� C101NJ(J NC07I 3 WIT"' H2M '� t�wviNCS ( ^ :6 sp 7777 777 - 77 77 7777-7 • - - _,_ . . - �RGFGr�, TO EaF''•I F'O<2, 1.../'�'tiDSCAP%1°Jcs' � � e f. .--,___•__.. . -- _. S - - .e , v_r. ,..w.e.,,a N•a.-.,n . 2- ♦... n , ' •- .,. ,.P". i. , t Y - - .. ... , Y ii / I / IIb I r.. O _ I o EGEy. S.oa ToP OF W/�GG � I I I I I EGE✓. g•SO'BOT Oc- W-,ge6 ' co O, KING STREET TO0,,c- w<l GG EGEY. 5.-OG' BOT Grc t-v�t LG I J I I LOT 17 h �• ,� �� + J l °,/S8 50 21 ' 10" E 155' 5. 1420SED 9 io �1 _s IOP OF BULK HLAL) e.�sx. � {q/ELC I I I I O �� s=o h' Aon5.5� J l J 3 0 G.F. /2.. C.P. /?C /h� CGA SS _Z� "PIiop. - q 2 STY. BLDG. TYPE 2 G EAC 4/�t/G Go / I TC- I r............ � � � T/VE o� '1 _ OE/o TH m Fin/FG/2. EG./o. O so , _ /'1V x �h 412_ (V oo a`so 3 V 4.3 X I I �� //vY a') .4 f w4 qe ND ��• 4 So ao rTwRL L " - �c ` ••••. rYPE /LP O T Y�C L 1� � •up •• /(/GET EC_= 4.0,8 -- - - _ � •� O 2 ,' 26 /t/O,py-.�,/ L/.�/E n/ yS.. . -'j" G.2.4NT B.so (9 I / .�5. ..., 1... ........ - - OEPTi�/ - ,, )k^� � IO • ,• �•• �.so j �} ; ` � 12 �\ `y� '1?.� -WOOD & L.ONc,. SEE OET.4/L A ILLL Wh o c"TY�) - HEADWALL Z may\ 0 D I - /Fa/P BGcs wv/o a,c' o IhI s T 22 7111 S A.PE.�1 O k 4 I I I l �s•'� `'IV TA� � N. S WALL / m \� _ - 14�7 /�. m _ id�c'tJ�' F/n/• O J 0,000ol P78 / /0-00 23 c G 9 _ �•/ / / / \ 15' / / 1�ji - ray 1' 7 Yes 1 L ` 5 z �T Y/9 SES SETA/G> S,�9 ,S'� / / ,l ✓ / 1 , /.VL E'T" EL. a / A3 /VCH �AR .� i 9� i ( -/7 .r \ �0 22i �6o ,co-. B-2Q �, �/ !ECEV S. 9t%rl" �.f, o �h , / I h. // , \ � '� �`/' .s r- �� / h h 1 2 \ + o /I� EL. a.s niALL p� Posh 20' / yZaj, / EL. S.3o a rrrvALL ( / ' oE,r O / O Ct �i sr�tL //fN/C/EC_ CUTCHOGUE l2 1 ri. ✓� �' - FF 8.i�/ Cn p� U p4D CANS �h Zh / -y k \� STEEL W,'ALL - -- - - \ �\ E'GE�l' - /o.60/K ..` 6� v J rra '-7 3 (7.��0 pypVV iQ0.T.4 nviN6 WALL i PV - - ,� k.. \. \h•. ac /1 HARBOR i COQ o�... r�x.,Sr. �. ....... 3/ I ��.. �(�• '�- -- JAL TYPE 2 LP C. EL. 5'00 E- - i 33 as - a 28 ,' 106 MAIN 6 341 5 b CO , 9 - - -- / OL ULK HE ' / \ TEMPTER O 8.30 EFFL tJE,1V 7- j8 a ' / 1 B.BoG PoDGS 35 a ( r / / I 1 \ 1 .e T�� L Tf,� .Z o 40 T/�� /, 0/ AV.A \ I / / /B G.F' /6 I-TCP �'� �� tij' a� Q �!�D Q GATS y1h i L� / 1� ��/ I m i/ 101' �1 �\ 1�0/ IJ/ Q •.; :t L---------1 wA5t7l ITEiQ LCT 21 _ v i f ; B.So EFFG UEN/7- (;,Poo , ? r/a I CEA /nI G Poo \ \ OA !�j WAST -W TER \ ` \ \ N V� ��• p0 8°� *" - -� TREATMENTPGAM7f- �� f ' �j / '1) 1) / p/ O�j/ \ \ �\ o�j/ ' \ y� 3�°fir2 F �' - t - - I" a• - -' tk; / 6/ 6 ' /.. �. O.: Al SILL I 1 I ,� ! I � .,t o A 7 i.vG PLAT"Fd.e tit it sEE oErA/L B L - -T - -- I i �I \�\ �F/XE"o S•r,�UC;TU�E wr>h/ BECK 1 1 FOR BLOwu.o '.' .. t Can/ sLgB I ` c of Tf//S AREA P .O.P:BOAT`STAORAGE� •• y GPAn/T \ l • Bsp a SOdT.0 L/x/E .d/ S. T Y.oE 2 LEACH//1/G i - - -- x �OOG 1^1C 7 ECEV• 3.0 F//V. FLAP. E[ %[S - -- -� '• �1 41i y\ \ �. ` y��► •�� / 4j/ /NVERT ECEV. = O.O oh \ �( / A'/ „ 9j • �'1/� �'� 1j / I \�� \� �(a, ' \ 6�� / O�, 10� \\� 1 1D1 aj• ,9' E,�cE(T7 oE/�Tf/ tr 3' A 3' / l / T�PAvE 2Z /Q.C.!� p •BRE K WA T E.�) CG.4 S S G 44 45 ib ( T/OA e- BATE [ ; ¢. O O -1 of , i '1 / 6 - TYPE 2 GEACA//it/G POOL 3. �• 2. / 3 . ply A; (v I^le-ET EG�1/ = 2.78 1 _ I -----�' REVISIONS • /N VERT EGEI! _ -4.2 \ TYPE,Z LN84° 41 -0 W 2 15'� TYPE >` f. -3 , j / � / .3' EFFECTIVE 'DEPTH /NLET EL.3.00 ��QQE>A/N/,vc wgLL oP /NLE E• r / / / / �� Z- 8- 8Y3 - //VC�E'EA SE .S/ZE OF BOAT S TO�q GE �J h HE/AIL 4 1 710. S T (\, L FROM 1.5' TO 4� 00 4 8.20 / 9• 2" \Dr �Pv q , (D I / / - /`900/FY G/eA oES a) SdUTf� �C, 2 (°P 4,3%L L O T 19 AAO 0RA/A/'4GE Ta F//c'ST ST/PEET 40 20 0 40 SCALE. 1"= 40 I / / / f / / Designed By: Project No: // , RJT RCMB 86-01 MARINA ASSOCIATES INC. // / / LEGEND Drawn n By: Drawing No: / Checked(�y: Scale: EXAMPLE TioAL 131.r1 -wZ 7. /4 AsoVE 1W,6,4A1 Low W.4rL�Q CML w) Q,- euTC//OCrUE, 1 = 40 MARINA BAY CLUB n/Ew S uFFoL e NA QBOR Reviewed BY0 Date: S.it ACdOVE MEAN SEA LE�/EL (M 5 4) A7- TAAIOY //oo,e DEC. 1986 NEW �-E�sEY Revisions NEW SUFFOLK, SOUTHOLD TOWN \ o..TL/STME/✓T � 2_8_88 NOTE: -\ �o�S E.o ' ' 3-3-88 GENERA L f'�POPE�P T y L/t/E S SNO t A.1 AS PE,Q _ _ L/SEs sf/ow OE,dTi! e,640 .v ME,4,Al 4ow v✓Ar,ER SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK su.Qv�y gy ROOE�'/CK ✓AnI Tc./Y� F?C. - - G/C. ./ 4n/p SU?vEYO/25 GeEFe/noRTnlY. a CN75G� L /n/ES Sf/oW EL.,EV, Alio✓ A1,- tn/ SEA LE✓EL AT ,0- a/� 25626 ' ' SAA/OY BOOK, NE{C/ TER3Ej' DATEU : AUG. 2/ /98Z l9 � PEV/SED MAP 7 /9f36 d 6 516.752.9060 �/eoPosE� co�vr-ov.Ps , Consulting Engineers 516.694.3040 ❑ Environmental Scientists 516727.3460 ❑ d r` 516.694.3410 ❑ Architects - Planners ,.......,............ .0.x,4 it/,4G� .�]/PEA /.p.4.�y 1 .� � � 201.227.8050 ❑ Holzmacher, McLendon Durrell , P. C . O �Cf/ NAL / A/� INLE7 Melville, N.Y. Riverhead N.Y. Farmingdale, N.Y. Fairfield,N.J. O LEAC/ P0.`�L v�/�cSOL/O COvE,e Y LL N N Sheet Title: Sheet DRAINAGE PLAN ` 0 M a " "ALTERATION OF THIS DOCUMENT,EXCEPT BY A I O LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ILLEGAL" Z_ Z DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR MARINA BAY CLUB SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK REQ'D. 10' DIA. LAND CONTRIB. RUNOFF INTENSITY STORJGE REQ'D,EFF, n AREA USE AREA SF COEFF. (IN/HR) FT DEPTH (FT) MAS PA Y/+�IE�T L/M/TS-Pel J/EME/VT A Robf 1920 1.0 2/12 320 6aF Gravel 1120 0.4 2/12 75 #S BA R Landscape 1120 0.15 2/12 28 P.POPoS E0 r o/�/T/IV UO US) 3" �¢� 423 7 /=0" A-JA.�AUT/t/OR2E0 TRE�/CH W/D7� /=0" GRADE B Roof 8640 1.0 2/12 1440 ivrEE7- Ex/sT G��io� Gravel 19040 0.4 2/12 1270 Landscape 1600 0.15 2/12 40 I s'f1l'c/GlJT $�Ft/GUT �X/�S'T Pf-11/Eiv(ENT' ��20/ao.SE,C� 7,fl,4✓EM�NT- �1Yy , j � { N • 6' f 2750 41 C Roof 960 1,0 2/12 160 1,1 Gravel 20000 0.4 2/12 1334 /P0�4Q/✓i9y 1494 22 • `\\// D Roof 3200 1.0 2/12 534 •� \ /�V��`��\� �� t �' Gravel 2 Landscape 04 13 120 0. 2/12 28 98 � •• , 1960 29 PAVEW1/T •+` •. E Imperv. 480 1.0 2/12 80 Gravel 19200 0.4 2/12 1280 cS�IweUT EX/QST. PA 1Vr. /�REQ�. 1 . Landscape 960 0.15 2/12 24 �OrE� �T.e.4/CHT T:�.4/USVEi�cS� t�0//C!T 1384 21 F Roof 6176 1.0 2/12 1030 PAVEMENT TRANSITION DETAIL Gravel 17194 0.4 2/12 1146 32 2176 B�GKF/L[. N 7-c5 • ' G Roof 6176 1.0 2/12 0p Gravel 2560 0.4 2/12 11�Q +•' Landscape 2 080 0 .15 2 12 _5 2Dr I 1253 I 9 W H Gravel e 9 54 8 0.4 2/12 399 Q 399 6 t, ' C T ` - ONi A EC> TABLE OF 10' DIAMETER LF.Af 11INf. POOL STR CTUR ES c�U ---- ------- ---------- GR� G A A/¢ A R L SEE S/-rE P LAN F02 L / OCAT ONS „ 1 A n A RDE/Q !J ote 11 ale eU o a In at datura. BY TyE ENG//�/EE.2� l:" DIA. P]PF DISTRI M1llT 101 PIPF. Y 87'1 TO $TRI LENGTH INVERT EL, :RF.N ARL T ■ ■ I 1 x 10• III, Inr 4.87 Drnlnnge Aren "B" CAL CO'N'CRETE - DETAIL 112, inr - 4.77 inlet /l - al 8.00 • Al T.S. 1 J l0' lfl, ina 4,93 L.D./Pool 6' !I), Inr 4.77 1 4 10' 111, 1., 4,83 1/4, inr 4.77 • - 1 5 10' ill, 1n. 4.87 @/5, Inr 4.77 \,�J)................. j I 6 10• l/l, In• 4.81 t 016, inr - 4.77 5 7 10' @15• in a 4.87 /� A / �+n r @/7, Ina - 4.73 S1-1,1P6-0 G)"AAALAR SU64�/�IOG 7 0 n11at P 150• 117, to. - 4.77 Bulkhead 0 Bulkhead, Inr - 3.27 W/Tide] Get., i s -•v 8 9 10• 018, 1n. - 1.17 Drainage Are. "A" 119, Ina - 1.07 Inlet 18 at 4.70 E.D./Pool - 3' •9 10 10P/9. fn• - 1.17 @110, lea 1.07 11 Ix 10' fill, in• - 4.47 Drnlnnge Aren "C" TYPICAL.. PIPE TTRENCH DETAIL oo PJI2, tar 4.7J /foot - 61 7.60 Al. s• , 0 0�0 0 11 13 10• 1111. In. . 4.47 I I @117, inr 4.73 O 17 1S 10' l/L7, lar 4,47 @115, tnv 4.73 q, C7 II 14 10• @112. 1., - 4.47 t=0 @114, inr - 4.37 O 0 0 O 0 0 14 16 to. Pf16, inr - 4.47 @016 in• 4.73 000�00D .5 16 10' @115. fnr - 4.47 0 0 p 0 0 p @116• ina - 4,77 O Q p Q 16 Outlet P 180' @116, fn. - 4,43 Bulkhead @ Bulkhe.d, I., - 2.63 W/Tidal Gate T/D�JG T� [JC/C. T(�D 17 18 10, @117, Ina . 1.83 Drainage Aren "D" .6UCXf7'EAp @118, in, 1.77 Inlet 117 5.00 TO E.D./Pool 7' 'j IB 19 10• @118, inr 1.83 0119• fnr 1.77 �V��-7/ZG D /B/OG wJ ' 19 25 1D' @119, in. 1.83 ' - O // �/ x �M NW/ T�' @02S, f n r 1.73 26 Outlet @ 75' @/16, Inr 1.7] Bulkhead @ 8ulkheed, In . 1.79 W/Tidal Cat• Zg" \ 18 I2 20' @/18, !nr - I.B7 O tTl @II2, fnr - 1.62 2 5 3/4" 11 22 26 10' e122, Inr I.e7 17 21 '20• 2117, inr 1.93 /•2 � A CP J@121. tnr - 1.61 O C /Y S s �- 2'g' xl 24 10• 0/21. tn. 1.83 73 P/Ib, tar 1.7J 0, 36" 17 20 10' @117, inr 1.83 "2o: inr 1.77 IO 23 10' 2120• fnr 1.87 0027, Inr 1.73 27 I8 10' @127, fnr - 1.83 Drefnage Area "E" 0 --- - @118, inr - 1.77 Inlet 117 et 5.00 E.D./Pool - J' WO O'D 1x1 I9 x6' P017, in. 1.87 av�K�vE.ao @129, In, - 1.56 NEfjV1✓ DUTY M�JN/NOLE FRAME E Got/ER, xe 70 10' @119, fnr - 1.93 @130, Inv 1.77 CAMPB LL 7041",0R)- CO. PATTER¢/V N' //046 30 37 IO' @070, Inv 1.83 / ` , R APPROVED DUAL. @/JJ, In, - 1.73 EL E V, SEC T/D/moi 73 Bulkhead @ 27' 2173. her . 1.83 Rulkheed @ Bulkhead. Inv 1.55 V/Tidal Ceta 29 31 10' 0129• in r I.87 @/71, in: - 1.77 LEACHING POOL, FRAME &r COVER DETAIL 31 32 @131. fn. - 1.83 TIDAL GATE DETAIL � - � _ . _ @172• In. - 1.77 /V D w�� r Al 7.75. 34 76 lo' @134, Inr 2.87 Drainage Area "F" �G17 , it/OTE A6OVE F-O,e UtSE 0�/ T-y�E' 1��LEA CH/�t./G 72-0U�S @'76' tea - 2.73 6"D/ 034 Pool 4t 6.00 �� cSOL/� �'�✓�iQ, (�SE / /LET CU✓Eie 76 77 lo' 0176, inr - 1.87 2137, Inv - 2.77 f07e TYKEe.Q/A/ / /LET- TD J4 7a 20' e115, fn. . 2.83 BE C.4MBELL FOU/V/o�l/CO. /�4TTE"��/ No. @129, inr - 2_62 • 2/O¢ B oe A 1010/PO VEO E'Q u,4C 78 39 10' elle. Ina - 2.83 @/39, Inv - 2.77 i 74 35 10' 0174, In. - 2.87 _ - @135, l.- - 2.77 35 40 to, @175• Inv - 2.87 ' @140. in. - 2.73 40 At 10' 0140, inr - 2.83 0141, in+ - 2.77 a+.. . 41 Outlet P 87' PI41, lav 2.77 Bulkhead 0 bulkhead In.. . 1.86 W/Tidal C•ta 42 47 is, 0/42, tar - -0.17 Draln.ge Are. "G" a @147 ina -0.72 Inlet 142 - el 7.00 E.D./Pool - 7' 42 48 28' 0042, fnr - -0.17 0148, Ina - -0.46 42 63 117' 0042, Inr - -0.17 felies L/A/E Pe4 VeME/VT 0147. inr _0.27 -� • 47 49 25• 0147, inr - -0.17 '�J!®6,' SOTN W^4 Y-F CLASS a Drv^n Q' O b O ¢ e /9Q47S.*"//V G �� CFLI.N•'S7eS�S.PZZAnOE :. sOiWlGow _4"MW. FD ,Q AD_JU'"ST'/N y " II �s�f x�,'I'li, t,;�i1;'i�;l{k• t^ PATTE2/V ti�254/ ., 44 4s to @149, fnr --- -0.41 3 47 44 10' P167 1n -0.3F/i/ GRADE N/GNwAYCATCH BSS @64, a 77 , 01"; 7111�� 8� F @045, in, -02 ZeOUI 9 M//V. GB 65 .?EQU/REO �-S@( B -✓AyOUv02�Co. OF C/iS?/NG ya 45 46 l0' @145, 1., - -0.17 � @046, t. - -0.27 ti Iso st 10' @150, fnr - 5.17 DelnaAe He "APISI, Inv 5.07 inlet 050 8.20 E3 p 0 Q QQp O E.D./root 4' g4 lo o sl nutlet 1 70' P/SI, lea 5.07a o c � cr---3 c C2A [3 o t= t= o o neknBulkhead, Inr - /zUa RC/o Orr Air- Cr.PEQr=OQGCE7 G- AQ W4 r- rr �o� . W/ria.l c.1. r r' r- r- r /2 rrr- r 49 52 25' m 42 Inv.=-0,17 4.33 eel- el-4:55 O 49 inv.= 0.46 r d Designed By: Project No:N07E O 41 ,zECJ�s[/LAL f1XE TO RE/NFo¢eE0 q RJF W-G-CAST ,Q/A/6S r r �T /¢ RCM01 SeS/Z5 f4C-4-571-117/. � , Drawn By: DrawingNo: MARINA ASSOCIATES INC./o, D OII O Q Q -F -M lOO DIIDpIIr Checked By: Scale: 0 0 0 0 (� L:3 E ❑F- 4 cSHT Z of 2) D =C3 M 0 0 0 000 4 b y qJ -T _ �Sr AS SHOWN r- F- f- r r qJ %JW r-r r-- F r- r- r- F- i- r r W ,� �} Reviewed e . Date: MARINA R A Y CLUB �c 4, r r r >- r- h W ;� DEC. 1986 I �g" 3 SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD TOW F r F r- F r- h r f r-- 64 I r evisions: 4 � �- F- r (- r 'Q PV 4,� �' �' r r r' fr -'"11 36a, CALCULATIONS a DRAINAGEODIFY AF3LE , � A `b •� SUFFOLK COU Ti Y LVA' YORK J•j' X000 >aS/ // coNc,eETE �eE7-` PRECA5T cO.VCRF7,6 FaoT/�/� .40.0,0 PS/ FOOT/NCS LEACHII'UG POOL FRAME &c GRATE DETAIL Consulting Engineers 516.752.9060 ❑ Architects - Planners 516.727.3480 TYPE n 1 A TYPE "2n N.T.S. r` . , . r'w 201.227.8050 Ela. - Environmental Scientists Holzmacher, McLendonMurrell-It - LEACHING POOL -� , PINCE o Melville, N.Y. Riverhead, N.Y. Farmingdale, N.Y. Fairfield,N.J. T-s " �• � Sheet N NOTE: ALL REINFORCEMENT TO BE ASTM A 615, GRADE 40 Sheet Title: FOR LEACHING POOLS W/ SOLID COVERS, CHIMNEYS WILL BE REO-D. TO BRING CASTING TO GRADE "ALTERATION OF THIS DOCUMENT,EXCEPT BYA DETAILS & DRAINAGE TABLES 2 Of 3 Z LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ILLEGAL" Z M EXIST. DIRT SHOULDER PROPOSED 4' SIDEWALK TO BE PAVED PROPOSED MANHOLE 4'0 • " 4 BAs CA 6 0.C. 0' / .EACN w,4 Y EXISTING DIRT SHOULDER ` TO HARBOR TO BE PAVED D • r ;;• EXISTING ASHP. EXISTING ASHP. a PROVIDE NEW CURB PAVEMENT ! 2AVEMENT FOR LENGTH OF 5' 32 4' L1 PROPOSED CONC. / ASPHALT SLUICE (SEE DETAIL) D 4 HEADWALL W/SAFETY 0. I N EITHER SIDE OF 12" R.C.P. C o C BARS �� . INLET. BULLNOSE 1 w PROPOSED CONC. HEADWALL W/SAFETY BARS CURB AT ENDS ALLOW R.C.P. TO EXTEND 6" FROM KEY DETAIL PROVIDE 10'0 LEACHING 6' B RETAINING WALL - CUT PIPE No 9 PLAN POOLS W/CURB INLETS A r A ,PARALLEL TO RETAINING WALL0. PROPOSED 3' 4' 75" PROPOSED ASPHALT BOAT PROVIDE R C. SLUICE SEE DETAIL • @ O � ( ) STORAGE .tDaR/i�T- T� H,,/T.N A'/�N EGEN.tr'ioAr 31' REVEAL 23q - cavc. e�•/CAW #V1A ra�".4.0t B PROVIDE t;_'Rc. Pr�4a'7�m r/r-A�J �Evo c v.�" osyFi�LSE T 3" REVEAL 5' GRASS DISH DOWN PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED CURB AND SIDEWALK IN THIS AREA '!'' 3 Iwo Q.4ms TAPER FROM 6" CURB REVEAL DISH DOWN PROPOSED CURB TO 3" CURB REVEAL OVER 5' PROVIDE NEW CURB PROPOSED CU B 5' AND SIDEWALK IN THIS AREA PROPOSED 4' (SEE CURB TRANSITIDN DETAIL) FOR LENGTH OF 5 /r•rrPia�c • TAPER FROM 6 ' CURB REVEAL ON EITHER SIDE OF / �_ TO 3" CURB REVEAL OVER 5' tLlxMbvu"ST75Y' w/f SIDEWALK PROPOSED RETAINING WALL INLET. BULLNOSE 12 R.C.P. (SEE CURB TRANSITION DETAIL) 4 5, CURB AT ENDS sEE ��'•��- Ih e BEGIN TAPER HERE PROVIDE 10'0 LEACHING r/ SEE LOCK 41401A r PROPOSED GRASS AREA POOLS W/CURB INLETS PLAN F PLAN •) N.T.S. •• I � CONCRETE /NI�ERT N.T.S. F'MMQ't7 7'-O a 7 oEP7"f/ •• OF I/PE' I W!` e l es /2'o.C. -ACiv Yv.I r SECTION C-C I-- 4' -I F- 4' DRAINAGE IZANHOLE PROVIDE #4 BARS 1' -I--J I _ I L L I PROVIDE #4 BARS ACROSS PIPE I I I T- 1 -1 -1- ACROSS PIPE 1 -1--1- I I _L-L-I_ TYPE A-- ENTRANCE AS -L- --t--I— ENTRANCE AS 1_�_�_I_ 15 R.C,P. I 1 I I I I 15" R.C.P. NO SCALE SAFETY - I - - I SAFETY _ _ _ _ 1.5' I ► I I I 1.5' I— I I I I I _r-I- -I- 1— 3" THICK 3' WIDE 1- I I 3" THICK 3' WIDE 77-- ASPHALT SLUICE I 71 I I 1 �- ASPHALT SLUICE —I— --�-1—a —�—I— I -j--1-1—x--L—I- -J 4 I--j--FLL 3 -i- -rt-+-j -�-i- CONCRETE HEADWALLWITH PROPOSED CURB 3' 1 t -� I i I I i I I #4 REINF. BARS @ 6 , O.C. LINE +-j--E--I- CONCRETE HEADWALL WITH -t- -7-fi-T--�-I- BOTH WAYS. ALL REINF, II 5' 3' I 5' _�_�_�_ _�_�_�_ #4 REINF. BARS @ 6" OC BOTH OOD000 I I I I I I I r� +• �T" •.1 I I BOTH WAYS. ALL REINF. o -I--�-i-T-T -r-I- 2' MIN COVER. ALL BARS ,. I I t -t I 2" MIN COVER. ALL BARS TO BE EPDXY COATED 6 -I-�- -T- r-t- o TO BE EPDXY COATED oO M WATERLINE 3 o OOoOO SECTION B-B C= =00 CURB TRANSITION SECTION C-C 00©000 N.T.S. DETAIL N.T.S. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL TOP OF PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL CURB & S/W PROP. PROPOSED GRADE EXIST. PAV'T BEYOND 5.PROPOSED HGH xCONC. HEAIDWALL 28" M PAV'T PROPOSED CONIC.4' LHEADWALL WITH #4 BARS @ 6" O.C.B.W. 215 5.5' HIGH x 4' LONG x 1 DEEP OVER ENTIRE HEADWALL WITH #4 BARS @ 6 O.C.B.W. INCLUDING PIPE OPENING PITCHOVER ENTIRE HEADWALL ALL BARS SHALL BE EPDXY COATED t�' 4 FLOW FOR 1 INCLUDING PIPE OPENING DISH DOWN CURB & — — ALL BARS SHALL BE EPDXY COATED SIDEWALK TO A 3" REVEAL TO ALLOW 6 15" , FLOW - PITCH ASHP. WATER TO OVERFLOW 3" R.C.P, TO HARBOR-- 3" 1/4" PER FOOT FROM ROADWAY OVER — — CURB & SIDEWALK TO To HARBOR ASPHALT SLUICE TO t5" R.C.P. 5'-5" 3' 15" Hrl✓►� OUTY MAN//OLE FRAME f,, GOVER, SID R.C.P. BITCH CAMPB4LL FOCJWORY CO. PATT'ER.�tJ Nt SIDEWALK & ASPHALT 3 WIDE ASPHALT SLUICE SLUICE 1/2" PER FT. OR APPROVED E'OuAL. TOWARDS HEADWALL 3" THICK & 3' PROPOSED CONC. HEADWALL WIDE CONC. SLUICE SECTION A-A SECTION D-D MANHOLE FRAME COVER DETAIL_� - DETAIL— A DETAIL— B N.T.S. N.T.S. t Designed By. Project No: JBy.8 RCMB MARINA ASSOCIATES INC: •••►._. Drainn Drawing No:o: PROPOSED FF GRADE TO SLUICE GRADE Checked By. Scale: NO SCALE ""� � �� Date: Reviewed By DEC. 198 UM _ "� 7 p 3 10 Revisions: 11 1, � R' TOLD � � - 2/8/88 ADD DETAIL A � 3,. ADD DETAIL II B,1 L �► 'fie �� " OEoRo'r COMPACTED 3' SLUICE SHOULD BE � SUBGRADE 3"., DISHED & 3" DEEP 516-756-8000 [l ASPHALT SLUICE 516-727-3480 ❑ 201-575-5400 ❑ DETAIL a , N.T.S. ' Holzmacher, McLendon & Durrell, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS •SURVEYORS r- I ,» MELVILLE, N.Y. RIVERHEAD, N.Y. FAIRFIELD, N.J. N N Sheet Title: Sheet 'ALTERATION OF THIS DOCUMENT, EXCEPT BY A _ 3 OF V` LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IS ILLEGAL' Z + Z m