Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
The Hamlet at Cutchogue 1989
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT THE HANILET AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGIJE, NEW YORK: GREENMANTEDERSENN, INC. ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTSI'LANNERS BABYLON, N1' DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK PROJECT LOCATION: Town of Southold Suffolk County New York APPLICANT: Nocro, Ltd. P.O. Box 953 Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 LEAD AGENCY AND CONTACT: Town of Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. (Chairman) 765-1938 PREPARERS: Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Consulting Engineers 325 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 (516) 587-5060 S. Peter Salerno,,. P.E. ; Director of Development Services Robert Grover; Director of Environ- mental Services John Healey; Project Manager DATE OF PREPARATION: October 1988 Revised June 1989 AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENT: This document represents a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) . Copies are available for public review and comment at the office of the Lead Agency. Comments on the Draft EIS should be submitted to the Lead Agency listed above by to be included in the public record. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Background and History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Project Need, Benefits and Objectives of Sponsor. . . . . 2-4 Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8 Design and Layout. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10 Construction and Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-14 Approvals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-19 INVENTORY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Subsurface Geology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 .S- Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 Topography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9906 . . . 3-7 Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9 Agriculture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-17 Vegetation and Wildlife. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-19 Land Use and Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-21 Land Use Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . . . . . . 3-24 Community Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-28 Demographics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-30 Visual Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-34 Cultural Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-35 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Geology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 Vegetation and Wildlife. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11 Land Use and Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-12 Community Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-13 Visual Resources.'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-18 Cultural Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-19 It-- MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Soils and Topography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Water Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 Land Use and Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 Community Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 Cultural Resources. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE UNAVOIDABLEADVERSE EFFECTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 ALTERNATIVES Alternative Technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 Alternative Scale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3 Alternative Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 Alternative Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 No Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES. . . 8-1 GROWTHINDUCING ASPECTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 REFERENCES APPENDICES Appendix A - Demographic Information Appendix B - Plant List and Vegetation Report Appendix C - water Supply Report Appendix D - Groundwater/Nitrogen Budget Analysis Appendix E - Synopsis of Proposed Zoning Ordinance Appendix F - Traffic Impact Study Appendix G - Correspondence Appendix H - Archeological Study Appendix I - Tax Assessment SUPPLEMENT I - Colonial Shopping Plaza REAR SLEEVES A - Property Line Survey B - Grading and Site Plan C - 3 Unit/Acre Alternate Layout TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE FIGURES Figure 1 - Location Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9 Figure 2 - Stages of Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-15 Figure 3 - Soils Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 Figure 4 - Topography Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 Figure 5 - Suffolk County Groundwater Contour Map. . . . 3-12 Figure 6 - Private Well Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13 Figure 7 - Church R.O.W. Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-22 Figure 8 - Land Use Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-27 K F J SECTION I SUIKMARY SUMMARY This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) has been prepared to provide complete assessment of impacts of construct- ing a townhouse complex, entitled The Hamlet at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. In addition to providing a detailed description of the proposed project, the DEIS presents a portrait of the existing environmental setting, and a discussion of the following areas of potential impact: o Geology of Site o Groundwater and Water Supply o Land Use and Zoning o Community Services 4 o Cultural Resources o Vegetation and Wildlife o Transportation Following the impact analysis, a discussion of measures taken to mitigate impacts, and a discussion of alternatives is provided. This DEIS addresses all of the possible environmental impacts that may result from project implementation. As will be described in the sections to follow, there are virtually no sig- nificant environmental impacts anticipated from the project. Mitigating measures,' however, are incorporated into the project to reduce or eliminate the minor effects of the Hamlet at Cut- chogue on the surrounding community. The report leads to the conclusion that the project location is an optimal setting for the development of a planned retirement community to serve the Hamlet of Cutchogue and the Town .of Southold. 1-1 SECTION II DESCRIPTION OF ACTION BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The subject parcel, situated near the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, was purchased from Leisure Greens Associates by Seacroft, Ltd. on September 1, 1983. At the time of purchase said parcel con- tained 46.16 acres zoned M Light-Multiple Residence. An addi- tional parcel consisting of 7.1 acres zoned "B" Light Business was also purchased from Leisure Greens Associates by Seacroft Plaza, Ltd. For the purposes of this report, the possible development of the commercially zoned parcel will be addressed separately and is included as Supplement I at the rear of this report. Prior to the purchase of the site, on February 1, 1984, a petition was filed with,the Town Board requesting a change of zone from A Residential-Agricultural to M Light- Multiple Resid- ence. Along with this petition, both a long and short Environ- mental Assessment form were filed. On March 22, 1983 the Town Board as lead agency declared that the project was "unlisted" under Section 8-0109 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law. It was further determined that the project would have no significant impact upon the environment and that an Environmental Impact Statement was unnecessary. The change of zone request was granted on July 19, 1983. A preliminary sketch plan for the construction of 160 condo- minium units for senior citizens was submitted in April of 1984, and later a certified set of plans (which bore the approval of the Building Department) and request for site plan approval was 2-1 submitted on October 17, 1984. Upon review of the plan by the Planning Board, the Board determined that the action was subject to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (SEQRA) , expressed the desire to be the lead agency and fur- ther determined that the project constituted a "Type 1" action requiring the preparation of a full Draft Environmental Impact Statement. On November 7, 1984 the SEAR Positive Declaration was issued by the Town Planning Board. On January 7, 1985 a resolution was adopted declaring the site plan application incomplete under SEQRA, and denied it. Subsequent to this determination, a petition was filed with the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Suffolk by Crob and Cron, Esqs. , attorneys for Seacroft Ltd. , the development corporation, protesting the Planning Board Action. On March 21, 1988 the court ruled in favor of the Planning Board, declaring that the proposed action a "Type I" as defined by Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and requiring the preparation of a full DEIS for the project. As previously mentioned, on April 9, 1984, the applicant was given a pre-submission conference with the Planning Board to discuss the senior citizen development. At that conference a plan was also presented showing the layout of a proposed shop- ping plaza on the 7.1 acre site. The Town felt that the develop- ment of the business parcel was connected with the development of the senior citizen community. Subsequently, the Town Board declared itself lead agency and required the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 2-2 In order to conform to the desire of the Planning Board, an analysis of the possible construction of a Colonial Shopping Plaza for this parcel has been evaluated and is depicted in the Supplement at the rear of this report. It should be noted, though, that the applicant does not have any immediate intention of developing this 7.1 acre parcel. The 46.16-acre subject parcel is currently vacant and sub- stantially void of any mature growth. Although no farming or other agricultural uses have taken place on this site since the applicant purchased the property in 1983, it can be assumed that because of its currently cleared state and its relatively flat terrain, this parcel was used at one time for some type of agri cultural purpose (i.e. , the growing of potatoes, tomatoes, corn and/or cabbage, etc. ) . With respect to the issue raised by the Planning Board as to whether there has been a subdivision of the subject premises, we would respectfully submit that the issue is moot in the light of the adoption by the Town Board of the Master Plan and the rezon- ing by the Town of the premises into separate and distinct zoned parcels, to wit: the 7+ acre parcel into a Hamlet Business Dis- trict and the 46± acre parcel into a Hamlet Density Residential District. The Town Board by its action has set-off the business parcel from the residential' parcel which would render a similar action moot. 2-3 PROJECT NEED, BENEFITS AND OBJECTIVES OF SPONSOR As stated in the Master Plan Update prepared by the Planning Consultant firm of Raymond, Parrish, Pine and Weiner of Tarry- town, New York, and as detailed in a subsequent section (Human Resources - Demographics) the population of retirement age per- sons in eastern Suffolk County in general, and the Town of Southold in particular, has increased greatly in the past decade. The trend is expected to increase at a rate greater than that of the general population growth. Along with this change in age structure there has become a need for increased senior citizen housing in the Town. Town of Southold Master Plan recommendations regarding overall planning call for,providing "a community of residential hamlets which are: composed of a variety of housing opportuni- ties and commercial, service and cultural activities; serving to establish a sense of place; set in an open or rural atmo- sphere;". . . striving for compatibility between the natural environment and development. In regard to residential develop- ment, the Master Plan recommends providing for "the development of a variety of housing types to meet the needs of people at various stages of the life cycle, various income and age levels and household compositions", and encourages" housing develop- ment, of varying types and densities in and around existing hamlets". Construction of the proposed project will address many of the goals and recommendations stated in the Master Plan. The predominant housing type within the Town of Southold is the 2-4 single family home. The proposed "Hamlet at Cutchogue" will add to the availability of multiple residence units and help meet the goal of providing a variety of housing types. The design of the project groups residential units together leaving large areas of open space thereby helping to preserve an open or rural atmosphere. The overall placement of the proposed project is within walking distance of the center of the Hamlet of Cut- chogue. This not only eliminates the need for vehicle trips for shopping but also is in accord with the recommendation to con- struct housing in and around existing hamlets. As stated pre- viously, the proposed project will help to provide needed senior citizen housing in the town and, through its central location traditional architecture Ond careful site planning will provide compatibility with surrounding development -and strengthen the overall feeling of "a sense of place". Senior citizens currently occupy many of the larger homes in the Town; the upkeep of these homes and the lack of security are two of seniors' major concerns. The development of this project will enable senior citizens to move to a more desirable dwelling and also allow younger and larger families to purchase and re- store these large houses. As previously stated, the primary social benefit of the proposed project is _to j provide adequate senior citizen housing within the Town of Southold while its major economic benefits include an increase in the town's tax base, without a comparable 2-5 increase in the cost of services, stimulation of the construc- tion and building materials industries and creation of mainten- ance and management opportunities after construction is com- pleted. As explained in the Master Plan Update Summary for the Town of Southold prepared by Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, Inc. April, 1985, "a statement of what the Town considers to be its long range goals and the desirable types and patterns of develop- ment appropriate to achieve those goals is essential". As part of the master plan update, each of the four major hamlets of the Town of Southold, including Cutchogue, were examined in depth concerning the existing and future conditions of development vacant land, parking and traffic patterns, natural and environ- mental features, and historic areas. Also derived in the Master Plan Update were Hamlet Land Use Plans that were designed to: o Maintain the hamlet as a community focal point and an activity center. o Strengthen the existing retail and service commercial uses in the hamlet centers. o Provide adequate parking for commercial and public uses. o Provide for & range of housing for younger and older res- idents with a__ range of income levels within the hamlet areas, with higher densities near the center and lower density in outlying areas. o Recognize that transition areas exist between the hamlet business areas and outlying residential areas. 2-6 o Provide for some auto-oriented, general commercial uses at the outer edge of the hamlet to complement hamlet center commercial uses. o Where appropriate, provide areas of sufficient size to establish office parks or light industrial parks to of- fer opportunities for expanded economic development with- in the Town. o Provide areas for recreation activities as well as open space areas for passive recreation opportunities and for protection of environmental features. o Suggest road improvements• where desirable for smoother traffic flow within the hamlet and/or the Town. o Preserve agricultural use of land where prime soils ex- ist and a sufficient number of contiguous parcels have remained in farming activities to maintain the viability of agriculture in relative proximity to the hamlet cen- ter. o Protect the quality of ground and surface waters and nat- ural environmental features. 2-7 LOCATION The proposed senior citizens project is to be situated on approximately 46.16 acres located at the intersection of School House Lane and Griffing Street in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Township of Southold. Specifically, the parcel is referred to on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 102, Block 01, Lot 33.3 (see Figure 1) . As shown on a survey of the property (see Rear Sleeve A) , access to the site will be accomplished by using either Griffing Street or Schoolhouse Lane, both of which are classified as minor streets. Griffing Street intersects with Main Road, a major arterial road, approximately 1, 130 feet south of the subject parcel. SchoolhoVse Lane intersects with Depot Lane, a collector street approximately 1,000 feet east of the subject parcel. The current zoning of the site- is Hamlet Density. Under this zoning classification, the property can be constructed up to a maximum density of 4 units per acre. 2-8 LOCATION MAP UCK P.S. i EAST HAM @ TCHOGUE *`ti uc CUTCHOGUE y CEM. JJ C U 'U E y . y �• ` W J rU �a �� pf�•, O 1 �• K c O •� t � F AR NE ell c EDAlIS ftf[Tv.pp f , p r i0 f�L//Q- .. • ' \ OL ��N9a\ p ,f(✓My oil O !I O W y � A CO Itof n u NORTH FORK F Ot COUNTRr ; s+ , allW Cr. � a► � N�,seF = CLUB �est C J S.C.T.M. m DISTIST 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3 rn DESIGN AND LAYOUT The overall scenario of development calls for the construc- tion of 160 dwellings (40 4-unit complexes) to be clustered around cul-de-sacs or along two major roads, leaving several sizeable areas as "open space" . (See Rear Sleeve B. ) The two proposed roadways, each of which terminates in a loop, will be curvilinear in design, in order to conform to existing topography while being aesthetically pleasing. The site plan includes a total of 40 structures, each having a "footprint" of approximately 6,150 square feet and containing 4 dwelling units. In addition to this, proposed pavement areas (roads and driveways) measure 288, 062 SF for a total of 534,062 square feet of imperviouq area. This represents 27% of the total site area of 46. 16 acres. The amount of landscaped area for the site measures 331,400 square feet for a total of 16% of the 46. 16 acres. On site natural areas total 58,370 square feet for a total of 3% and turf areas measure 1, 087, 068 square feet or 54% of the total site area. At present, much of the site is cleared field, devoid of any trees with the exception of a small wooded area along the east- erly property line. All runoff will be contained on site and routed by means of swales, catch basins, and ponds. This system has been sized to handle a 6" rainfall as per Town of Southold requirements. Over- land runoff will be directed by swales and street grading to one of the two natural retention ponds located in the northern sec- tion of the property. 2-10 Domestic water for this residential plan will be supplied by an in-situ well. The project will include the construction of a 28 foot diameter, 24 foot high steel storage reservoir to provide storage for 100, 000 gallons of well water that will be used during peak demand. Treatment of the well water will be provided as required to supply the site with potable water. A two hundred foot radius has been established around the well. The design and construction of the well and reservoir will conform to all regulations of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. As of the writing of this DEIS, the applicant has been in contact with the Suffolk County Water Authority concerning the dedication of the proposed water supply well on this site. Through conversations with the SCWA, it appears that the SCWA is interested in obtaining this dedication as the property is well located for their needs. Please refer to Appendix C for detailed information on the supply of water for this project. The water will be distributed throughout the site via a six inch PVC water main following the roadway. Each building is supplied by a 1-1/2 inch service, tapped into the six inch main. There are fire hydrants placed in the development to supply the fire department with water in the event of a fire. Sanitary sewage will be disposed of via standard septic tank-leaching pool systems. Due to the ongoing changes in regulations, the current standards in effect at the time of this 2-11 report are the 111984 Standards for Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single-Family Residences". Under these regulations, it is stated that the population density equivalent can be calculated using either the Calculation Method or the Yield Map Method. For the purposes of determing the allowable flow for this project, the Yield Map Method was utilized. Under the Yield Method a map depicting a total of eighty-one (81) 20, 000 square foot lots was developed including a recharge basin area and two access roads. The allowable flow equates to 300 gpd/lot x 81 lots. Under the regulations, it is stated that for a 2 bedroom Apartment/Condominium unit, the design flow is 225 gallons/day, and for a Planned Retirement Apartment/Condominiums of one bedroom in size, , the design flow is 100 gallons/day. Under the 1984 standards, the design sewage flow rate for a Planned Retirement Community with 2 Bedroom Units is not speci- fically stated. Discussions with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services resulted in a determination of 150 gallon/ day/unit as a design flow rate. Determining the Allowage Sewage Flow Yield Map Method Allowable Flow = 81 lots x 300 = 24, 300 gal/day 24,300 gal/day/150 gal/day/unit = 162 units The sub-surface sewage disposal systems for each building will be large enough to accomodate a 50 percent expansion of the system. 2-12 Each building has a design sewage flow of 600 gallons/day (150 gpd/unit x 4 units) . Septic tanks will provide for 2 days flow (600 gallons/day x 2 days = 1,200 gallons) and will be eight foot in diameter; the effective depth of the ten foot diameter leaching pool will be 12.5 feet. The site plan provides for two parking spaces per dwelling unit, one garaged space and one driveway space. Parking spaces will also be provided for guests. The proposed community complex provides several recreational amenities for the residents of the Hamlet at Cutchogue. Planned are two tennis courts, a community center with game room and a swimming pool. These facilities will be for the use of the resi- dents of the development and their guests. 2-13 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION The total anticipated construction period is approximately two to three years, with construction being accomplished in three phases (see Figure 2) . Phasing of the project follows a logical progression. Phase I includes construction of the swales and pond, water supply well, storage tank and main access road through the site. Construction of Phase I provides key portions of the infrastructure necessary to construct subsequent phases. Phase I calls for the construction of the southeastern sec- tion of the property. Ten (10) buildings, forty (40) units are scheduled for construction in this phase. During the construction,of Phase I, the roads and infrastruc- ture for the entire site will be built. Roadways will be graded to design. Drainage, catch basins and pipes will be installed throughout the site. The sites for each building will be graded to design and the foundations will be poured. When the foundations are set, fram- ing and general construction of the buildings will commence. The construction of each unit will follow the following general pattern: Time Schedule Pour foundations Water proof foundations Install lolly column footings 2-14 r O r • - 1 o Z ISO' 1 �- W N -- -- -- -- -- i a S.C.T.M. 0 W 0 o W DISTIST 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3w rr U. J V N 0 F' N = W V H First floor decking Install lolly columns Complete frame (outside walls and interior partitions, roof truss) Exterior sheathing Windows Finish roofing Exterior finish Interior work: rough plumbing and HVAC tubs and showers electric includes lighting, sheetrock and tape and spackle interior finish As each trade or contractor finishes the job on one build- ing, it will move onto the next building allowing the following step to commence. This will be the general pattern of building construction for each 4-unit building. Phase II fully completes one branch of the roadway system. The roadway for Phase II will already have been graded with drainage installed during Phase I. Therefore, to complete the construction of the roads in Phase II, paving would only be required. Phase II calls for the construction of fifteen (15) build- ings (60 units) to be built at the same schedule as shown in Phase I. 2-16 Phase III completes the southwestern section of the site, landscaping and other amenities to complete the project. Phase III calls for the construction of the remaining buildings and for any additional finishing or reparative work in order to complete the development. The construction of the last 15 buildings (60 units) will follow the same pattern as in the other sections. Phase III also includes the construction of the recreational facilities, including the tennis courts, pool and community center. The following chart illustrates the approximate length of construction for each phase. TIMING SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION Phase I 12 months Phase II 8 months Phase III 10 months By phasing the construction of a project in this manner, adverse impacts to neighboring properties are minimized. Each section is completed in a shorter period than would be required to complete the entire project. Noise, dust, erosion-siltation and other potential nuisances to owners of adjacent parcels become relatively short lived. This method of construction provides the added benefit of earlier realization of increased tax revenue on occupied dwellings. Once constructed, maintenance of grounds and buildings will be performed by private contractors, hired by a Homeowners As- 2-17 sociation. Under the management of the Homeowners Association, the following parameters will be included: o Snow removal. o Mowing of all common lawn areas. o Maintaining all common areas. o Maintenance of swimming pool, tennis courts, and community center. o Maintenance of all drainage structures. In addition to the above mentioned parameters, on-site twenty-four hour security will be provided. 2-18 APPROVALS In addition to approval of the site plan by the Town Plan- ning Board subsequent issuance of a Building Permit, the fol- lowing approvals are also necessary: A) Suffolk County Health Department 1) Water supply system. 2) Sanitary system. B) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 1) DEC well permit. C) Suffolk County Planning Commission 1) Review 2-19 SECTION III INVENTORY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS NATURAL RESOURCES SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY The glacial outwash sands which make up the surface topo- graphy at the project site are one of several layers, or geo- logic strata, underlying the area. Beginning at the lowest strata, the bedrock is located in excess of 500 feet below the surface. This is an extremely old formation, dating to the Precambrian era of five hundred million years ago. All sedi- ments deposited on this bedrock formation were eroded until the sand and gravel accumulations known as the Lloyd sands were depo- sited during the late Cretaceous, about 60 million years ago. In the western part of Suffolk County, this strata contains potable water. However, in the project area, the formation is saline in nature. Abovg the Lloyd sand is the Raritan clay, also of late Cretaceous age, which although lying hundreds of feet below present sea level, contains floral fossils indicative of a dry land deposit. The surface of the Raritan formation underwent a period of erosion, after which the thick Magothy formation was laid down as a series of clay lenses, silts and sands. This layer, also Cretaceous in age, serves as the pri- mary source of potable water for most of Suffolk County, but as with the Lloyd sands, bears only saline water in the project region. The surface of the Magothy also underwent a period of erosion, and no additional' sediment was laid down for many millions of years until the glaciers brought us the Pleistocene till and outwash deposits. This upper glacial formation consti- tutes the sole source of water supply for the area, as will be discussed in detail in other sections. 3-1 The Water Supply Report found in Appendix C describes the findings of a test well dug on site. An excerpt from this report follows: "On April 4, 1984, the well driller installed a 2-inch well within the 4-inch well casing previously installed to 68 feet. The 2-inch well with 2 foot well point was driven to a depth of 98 feet. Samples were taken at 5 foot intervals from 98 feet to 73 feet again to collect data on nitrate and iron levels present. The wash from the 4-inch well casing was coarse to fine sand with trace amounts of gravel, and the driving of the 2-inch wells did not indicate any large clay or gravel layers. " 3-2 SOILS The "Hamlet at Cutchogue" site contains five predominant soil formations, Haven loam 0-2 percent slopes, Haven loam 2-6 percent slopes, Plymouth loamy sand 3-8 percent slopes, Plymouth loamy sand 8-15 percent slopes and Riverhead sandy loam 3-8 percent slopes (see Soils Map, Figure 3) . The characteristics of the soil types found on the site can be summarized in the following forms from the Soil Survey of Suf- folk County proposed by the Soil Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture. Haven loam. 0-2 percent slopes (HaA) The Haven series consists of deep, well drained, medium tex- tured soils. These soils have high to moderate available mois- ture capacity with low natural fertility. Internal drainage is good with moderate permeability in the surface .layer and subsoil and very rapid permeability in the substratum. The hazard of erosion is slight with slopes ranging from 0-2 percent. The formation comprises approximately 62% of the area of the site. Haven loam, 2-6 percent slope (HaB) Characteristics of this formation are similar to HaA above with the exception of erosion hazard which is slight to moder- ate. Haven loam covers approximately 10% of the site. Plymouth loamy sand. 3-8 percent slope (P1B) A very small portion of the senior citizens residence pro- ject parcel, about 1%, contains Plymouth loamy sand. The Plymouth series consists of deep, excessively drained coarse 3-3 textured soils. These soils have low to very low available mois- ture capacity and low natural fertility. Internal drainage is good and permeability is rapid except in the substratum where it is moderate. Hazard of erosion is slight within this formation. Plymouth loamy sand, 8-15 percent slopes (P1C) This formation is similar to P1B above with the following two exceptions. It tends to be more gravelly, particularly along the crests of low ridges, and the hazard of erosion tends to be moderate to severe because of the slope and the sandy tex- ture of this soil. The formation accounts for approximately 8% of the area of the site. Riverhead sandy loam, 3-8 percent slopes (RdB) The Riverhead series gonsists of deep, well drained, moder- ately coarse textured soils over thick layers of coarse sand and gravel. They have moderate to high available moisture capacity and internal drainage is good. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very rapid in the substra- tum. The hazard of erosion is moderate to slight within this formation which makes up approximately 19% of the area of the subject parcel. Engineering Properties As viewed on the soils map (Figure 3) , nearly 75% of the site is covered by the Haven Series of soils, HaA or HaB. These soils, as stated in the US Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk County, present only slight limitations to their use as homesites, streets, parking lots, sewage disposal fields and 3-4 lawns. A "slight limitation" according to the survey means that "the soil has few or no limitations" and that "any limitations that are present can be overcome at little cost". In short, these areas represent good locations, from a soils standpoint, for homesites and related appurtenances. The only exceptions to this generalization are areas within formation HaB containing slopes approaching six percent, where additional care must be taken both during and after construction to prevent erosion. However, this soil group represents only about 10 percent of the total site and the actual portion of this group having slopes near 6% is even less. Nearly 70% of the remaining area at the senior citizens residence, all but 9% of,the total site, is comprised of soils in the Riverhead sandy loam, 3-8% slope formation. This group, as with the Haven soils mentioned previously, poses few limita- tions to its use as a homesite or sewage disposal field. Again, the only exceptions are areas where the slopes approach 6% or greater. Proper siting of buildings and slope stabilization will overcome any difficulties caused by these steeper slopes. The remainder of the site contains Plymouth loamy sand. This formation, which lies predominantly in the area of the proposed pond, contains deep excessively drained soils with rapid permeability and good internal drainage, providing an excellent location for this facility. 3-5 FIGURE 3 RdB ti 1 1 PIB O J r O I Y I HaA N O o V W 0 0 RdB 0 1 o� N 1 HaB � PIC avow SOILS MAP HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE 1"=250' TOPOGRAPHY Unlike the northern portion of the Town of Southold which has elevations of 160 feet and steep slopes exceeding 50 percent in some areas, the topography of the residential property is somewhat flatter with lower elevations. One can generally characterize its topography as rolling, with slopes ranging from approximately 0.5 to 13 percent. The site contains two knolls with elevation above 38 and 36 respec- tively. These lie west of the centerline of the parcel, the first being at the southerly end, and the second 1, 000+ feet to the north (see Figure 4) . A low point of elevation 20+ is found near the easterly property line, equidistant from the two knolls. The runoff from the southerly two thirds of the parcel would be expected to flow toward this low point while the northerly portion drains to the north and east. 3-7 w I -- !4m .lirT. - ---' Zlz ' 001, '11 _ S.C.T.M. C DISTIST 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3 o w = n � oom .� = rn mei a 4 GROUNDWATER In contrast to the situation in the more western reaches of the County, where the Magothy and Lloyd aquifers contain vast quantities of fresh drinkable groundwater, these water bearing formations contain only salt water under the Town of Southold. For this reason, the Upper Glacial aquifer provides the sole source of drinkable water for the area of the proposed project. The "shape" of the groundwater surface follows that of the land surface, but at a somewhat reduced scale. As a result, the gla- cial aquifer can be thought of as topographically controlled, and consists of several mounds of water located under the higher areas of the town. The North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM - Northeast/Camp Dresser and McKee, 1983) recognized this charac- teristic and established five water supply zones for groundwater management purposes. Zone 3 covers the area from Mattituck Inlet to Arshamamoque Pond, including the project site. The Water Supply Plan also identified Water Budget Areas, which are those areas where there is sufficient depth, or thick- ness, of fresh groundwater to permit development of public water supply wells. The thickness of the groundwater aquifer is a function of the elevation of the water table above sea level, as described by a formula known as the Ghyben-Herzberg relation- ship, which accounts for the density difference between fresh and salt water. Simplified, the formula predicts a depth of fresh groundwater below sea level equal to 40 times the water 3-9 table elevation above sea level. Although this idealized pic- ture can be modified by local geological conditions, the rela- tionship provides a useful water supply planning tool. The Water Budget Area for the project region has been mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, and includes most of the inland portion of Zone 3, including the entire project site. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has also identified and mapped eight groundwater management zones in the County, based on hydrological characteristics and importance in protecting water supplies. The proposed project is in Zone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. The hydrological characteristics and management implications of the various zones are discussed in some detail in the Nassau-Suffolk Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan, known as the 208 Study (Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board, May 1988) . According to the 208 Study, this zone has unique conditions and requires careful management. Agricultural land use has impacted water quality, as will be discussed below, and saltwater intrusion is a problem near the shore. The plan also indicates ample water supply to sustain projected development, and calls for proper development and management of supply wells and disposal systems. The Water Resources Division of the Suffolk County Depart- ment of Health Services has installed and periodically monitored a groundwater well several hundred feet west of the subject pro- perty, on Alvah's Lane (Well #53327) . This well provides ground- water data from 1975 to the present which is useful in describ- 3-10 ing conditions in the project vicinity. This well is located at a ground surface elevation of about 25 feet above sea level, which is somewhat lower than the subject property. The ground- water elevation at this well shows a long term average (1975- 1988) of 4.08 feet above sea level. Seasonal fluctuations of the water table at this location generally range from a low of 3 .5 during the fall to a high of 5.5 during the spring. The maximum recorded groundwater elevation at the well was 6.78 in March, 1979, and the minimum was 2.20 in September, 1981. Based on the data presented on the Suffolk County Groundwater Contour Map (SCDHS March 1989, Figure 5) , the direction of groundwater flow under the project location is from northwest to southeast. Figure 6 presents a plan view of the surrounding area showing the locations of private wells in the vicinity of the subject site. Additional water supply investigations have also been con- ducted as part of the preliminary engineering for the subject property. A complete report on this investigation is presented in Appendix C. An exploratory well was installed on the pro- perty and appropriate data was collected in March, 1984. The groundwater elevation of the property was determined to be ap- proximately 7.0 feet above sea level. The higher groundwater elevation at the subject property, as compared to the Alvah's Lane well (which registered 6.2 the same month) is due to the higher ground elevations found on the project site. 3-11 I '053323 - / 1678/ 05353 i d o •� 7sa� � 061015 51i73 208+4_ O 53338 4f I i °47233 / °16780 ,� � � � � � �� 11704 C / , 0 051171 PROJECT �-� °51175 / -- - — O ' 510 9 \ \ r 05205C LOCATION - ' 0533!- --_---- 53335 5LI72 i` • \ 3846 � —°65606 � O 6524 0 • � - H O L� 053328 51170 3' 4, - SCJ U T �7 43 71045 . . j 0'53329 �' �� � / Z O 47234 ' / ( O 53322/ O 53324 ` ♦ / meson 53o s \ � �•� ��` 053336 / • ♦ 0 533 7 ' • 53333 _ 0 5333 a O 1582 ♦ ` 039269 53537 - - 16756 O 0 51587 \\ ♦ �!" O 53332 1 ; 071572 ` 06554 °T1576 4f 88716 051589 51581 , - \ j 4f / 88719 � � J - °54885 I /61402 88718 a s , \ \ 88720 O 5736983792 ♦ \ i GREAT PECONGC BAY� \ ��� , � 057368 .� � _ ♦ ,�,� / ' �� �3o FIGURE 5 i� ♦ ♦ ;' 046559 J Z 5 FIGURE 6 a — / I1901. N , I P10�TNTfcCE7 r 5.38'30'50"E i 1 27�.6a o h Y: a LEGEND % SUBJECT PROPERTY `3Tc ' o { 1 ® APPROX. LOCATION OF PRIVATE WELLS 1%.r6 4r-. M 1 1 '1000 Its i I I $ 2SZl,R N.87`l3'DO"w LOCATION OF PRIVATE WELLS AS PER I f r• "� I SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH RECORDS N.�fc's�t'20 "`009.57 ® O p O O O O O OO O/jO f-1,6NL fWD - 92040 ----1 J - HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE O a� o._ , D � O sO O / O PRIVATE WELL LOCATIONS go GREENMAN—PEDERSEN INC. SCALE 1"=300' As indicated in the 208 study, groundwater on the North Fork has been impacted by agricultural practices, particularly the use of fertilizers and pesticides. In this regard, pesticides probably have the greatest potential water supply impact, and one in particular, aldicarb, has generated the most concern. Aldicarb is the generic name for Union Carbide's product, Temik, which is used as a killer of leaf eating insects and, on Long Island potato farms, nematodes, which infest roots and cause severe crop damage. Aldicarb is from the carbamate family of pesticides and a potent nerve poison. Its effectiveness is due to its water based mobility and ability to be absorbed into plant tissues, forming a systemic (thus "temik") protective barrier. In 1977, the USE?A issued permission for exceptionally heavy applications of aldicarb on Long Island, and further raised the limit in 1979. In 1978, the pesticide began showing up in well water. By 1985, over 2,000 Long Island wells had been found to exceed the EPA aldicarb drinking water guideline of 10 parts per billion (Health Department standard is 7 ppb) . Aldicarb is no longer approved for use on Long Island, and groundwater levels of the chemical have shown signs of drop- ping. It is not known how long complete breakdown and ultimate disappearance will take. Fortunately, aldicarb can be removed from well water by installation of a carbon filter. On the subject property, tests conducted on samples from the ground water exploration well did not reveal contamination by any organic chemicals. In addition, the groundwater monitoring well 3-14 on Alvah's Lane has also been tested periodically. In 1982, a temik breakdown product, aldicarb sulfoxide, was detected at a level of one part per billion and, in 1983, this and another byproduct, aldicarb sulfone, were detected at 5 and 4 ppb, respectively. At this time also, two other pesticides, carbofuran (1 ppb) and oxamyl (5 ppb) , both, incidently, also now banned on Long Island, were also detected. However, earlier in 1983, all pesticides were below detectable limits. From this data and discussion, it is apparent that the pos- sibility of periodic slugs of low level pesticide contaminated groundwater passing under the property must be considered. Fortunately, careful well management and treatment practices can alleviate any such problgms, and no limitation on development results from this condition. Although pesticide contamination is a bigger headline grab- ber, fertilizer associated nitrogen loading should not be over- looked as a groundwater problem. Due to the predominant agri- cultural land use on the North Fork, this is a significant pro- blem. The Alvah's Lane monitoring well has consistently hovered around the 10 milligrams per liter drinking water standard. Somewhat lower levels were found at the subject property, al- though provisions for treatment are being included in the water supply plan for the project. There is, at the present time, no public water supply avail- able in the community. Therefore all development adjacent to and surrounding the project site is served by individual well 3-15 systems. The North Fork Water Supply Plan, referenced above, estimated the ability of the available groundwater, within the various water supply zones, to sustain existing and future development. Of the zones within Southold town, zone 3, which includes the project site, is in the best position to sustain additional development. It is estimated (Analysis of Water Supply and Implications for Master Plan, RPPW 1983) that in excess of 14,000 additional households can be sustained, a figure which will increase slowly over the next several decades, as agricultural pumpage decreases. Obviously, for this or even a lower level of development, extreme care will have to be exercised to maintain an acceptable level of water quality. 3-16 AGRICULTURE The subject property, prior to its purchase by Seacroft, Ltd. , was used for agricultural purposes. The parcel has been zoned M Light Multiple-Residence for approximately 5 years until its recent change to Hamlet Density. In November 1960, the Suffolk County Planning Commission, in its report, People and Parks, recommended the preservation of over 30, 000 acres of farmland. In 1972 the Suffolk County Legislature authorized the estab- lishment of a farmlands acquisition program. This program was created for the purpose of acquiring development rights to ap- proximately 15,000 acres of farmland. As of 1984, the develop- ment rights to over 540 , acres of farmland in the Town of Southold have been purchased. Suffolk County compensates the farmers to limit their land to farming uses exclusively. The County, therefore, was able to assure the preservation of land they felt had the greatest potential for agriculture in the future. The subject parcel was not included in the County's Master Plan for farmland preservation. The Town of Southold finds that the acquisition of develop- ment rights of lands used in actual agricultural production, within the Town limits, will "conserve, protect and encourage the improvement of prime agricultural lands for both the pro- duction of food and the preservation of open space", as stated in Chapter 25 of the Town of Southold Code. 3-17 Review of the Town of Southold Code, Chapter 25, Agricul- tural Lands Preservation, indicates that the properties is not on the list of properties to be acquired by the Town. 3-18 VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Vegetation and wildlife on the project site were surveyed in June of 1988, when most of the vegetation would be in evidence and when most of the site's wildlife would be in a breeding, non-migratory phase. Vegetation on the site consists of typical old field fringed by second growth woods. A complete listing and report on the vegetation is presented in the technical background appendix. None of the plants identified on the site are listed as endan- gered or threatened, nor are any contained on the New York Heritage list. The site is used by a variety of mammals, including gray squirrel, eastern cottontail, opossum, raccoon, chipmunk, meadow mouse, eastern mole, white footed mouse, house mouse, and pos- sibly, red fox. An eastern box turtle was also observed on the site. Various birds were observed on the property, many of which could be expected to be nesting on the site. Below is a table of the common names of the species found on the site. BREEDING SEASON BIRDS FOUND ON PROPERTY Red-Winged Blackbird Scarlet Tanager Common Yellowthroat Common Flicker Song Sparrow European Starling Yellow Warbler Wood Thrush Common Crackle Rufous-sided Towhee House Finch Chimney Swift Mourning Dove Barn Swallow Gray Catbird Herring Gull (flyover) American Robin Black-Backed Gull (flyover) White-eyed Vireo Ring-necked Pheasant Northern Cardinal Blue Jay Common Bobwhite American Crow Northern Mockingbird 3-19 None of the inventoried species are on any listing of endangered, threatened, or special concern species for New York State. The woodlands bordering the residential project site, to the north, provide better quality woodland habitat, which are pro- bably used by other species including various woodpeckers, thrushes, wrens, finches, titmice and nuthatches. Owls may also use these woods, although the north fork is historically raptor poor, except for Orient, where Great Horned Owls are quite numerous. During spring and fall migration periods, additional species may use the old fields as stopover sites. At this time, addi- tional flycatcher, warbler, finch and blackbird species would be expected. 3-20 LAND USE AND ZONING Land Use. Existing land use of the subject property is "vacant" . As stated in a previous section of this report, a large portion, perhaps 95% of the parcel, had been cleared for agricultural use prior to its most recent purchase. As with neighboring parcels, it was used for agriculture purposes at one time. Land use in the surrounding area varies widely. To the south are a school and commercial properties fronting on Main Road. Along its westerly boundary, the subject parcel is bordered by a residential area of single family homes. To the north are properties whose use is agricultural, while to the east lies another vacant ,parcel. Along Schoolhouse Lane, also to the east, is a residential area containing single family homes and a trailer park. There is also a machine shop opera- ting in this area. The commercial property neighbors the sight intended for the senior citizens residence, and therefore shares in the surroundings with the residential lot. As shown in Figure 7, the Church ROW Map, access has been provided to the property owned by the Church of the Sacred Heart by establishing a right-of-way easement on the commercial par- cel. This right-of-way will allow access to the property by using either Griffing Street or Schoolhouse Lane. As stated in the License Agreement, dated September 15, 1983, the parcel was sold to Seacroft Plaza, Ltd. The owner is obligated to assume the responsibility of providing access to the Church owned 3-21 � n D = Z M n v PROPOSED HAMLET V .x o.. r CUTCHOGUE COMMUNITY m ow -� m N 520 55'20"E 237-591N 520 55120"E S 520 55120" 2.41 55.10 c CHURCH R.O.W. SCHOOLHOUSE LANE 0 60.02 o _ _ 301.46' 100.30' Z o coo w o ° vs o w o - N N � o - m N � o Do , 2 a m V O 0 O -4 y = Z :1 � 11 N 0 r m -� O O m 0 N m, o m r ti O C ' j o 0 C� S,0 o 10 S 51° 22'50"W rn 189.14 N y�gRr N CHURCH R.O.W. MAP = FIGURE 7 MAIN ROAD parcel. This "proposed extension" is approximately sixty feet in width and four hundred feet long. It is located on the northern portion of the commercially zoned parcel, at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street. Zonincr. The residential property is currently zoned Hamlet Density and has been such since it was rezoned from "A" Residen- tial-Agricultural in July of 1983 . Surrounding properties to the east, west and north are zoned "A" Residential- Agricultural while those to the south are a mix of "B" Light and General Business. 3-23 LAND USE PLANS The Town of Southold through the Planning Consultant firm of Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, Inc. recently updated the Town's Comprehensive Development Plan. The updating involved three phases. The first deals pri- marily with the assimilation of information and data and the identification of goals and issues to be considered in the development of the Plan. The second phase is the development of the Comprehensive Development Plan. This was created through the coordinated work of the Consultants, the Planning Board, and the Master Plan Workshop Committee. The third phase includes the preparation of the essential instruments to implement the Plan. This stage includes ,the review and revision of the Town's land development regulations and also includes revising the zoning ordinance together with the existing zoning map. The background studies for the Master Plan Update indicate that the largest proportion of Town land is in agricultural use or vacant. Approximately 40% of the Town's land is used for agricultural purposes. A fraction of the Town's land is used for the development of residential, commercial and industrial facilities. Residential uses (approximately 15% of the land area) are clustered around creeks and inlets. Most of the existing residential development averages approximately 2-4 dwelling units per acre. The largest commercial areas (excluding Greenport) are lo- cated in the hamlets of Mattituck and Southold. Smaller, local 3-24 shopping areas are located in Peconic, East Marion, Orient and Cutchogue. Uses such as churches, schools, cemeteries, post offices and government facilities are generally located in the hamlet areas. Recreational areas, such as State, County and Town parks, golf courses, nature preserves and camps, range in size from neighborhood parks to the 350 acre Orient State Park. In March, 1988, a Draft Generic Environmental Impact State- ment was accepted by the Town Board on the Proposed Local Law of 1987 Amending the Town of Southold Zoning Ordinance. The pro- posed ordinance originated a number of new districts designed to implement specific policies included in the Master Plan. The Zoning Ordinance describes the formation of a Hamlet Density (HD) District which allows 4 dwelling units per acre. The subject parcel has been deemed to be included within the Hamlet Density District. The proposed project has a planned density of less than 3 .5 units per acre although current zoning for the site allows for a greater density. As can be seen, project density meets current zoning requirements. The section on existing groundwater conditions presented previously contains several references to the North Fork Water Supply Plan, Suffolk County, New York. According to this plan, public water supply systems in the Cutchogue area would not be economically feasible. However, the proposed project includes the construction of a single supply system to serve the entire development. This has been determined by engineering analysis 3-25 to be the most economically effective means of supplying water to the development. Because this system is to be constructed by the developer at his expense and maintained either by mainten- ance fees from the residents or by the Suffolk County Water Authority, there is not a conflict with the North Fork Water Supply Plan. 3-26 • FIGURE 8 pq • • • • M • • • • • • 0 M,7,1 •.*.JAZ ,w1' • all • • 1 :• i r*•�j/r t� • • • • s ,• : • • •• .Z 04 • • • • • • • • • % �" • • j • • • • �� •: : • .0 •••1••••••• • iii�• �•i•��,••i • •` • •�•• ••.•� i� • •• • c 0 EQ • • •� : : • • i•• •_ ••: •1• q�1• •••. • • :• :•o 0 •: : • • • i•:•' `, +1 • • • • • • • ✓ • • • • 0 • • • A•• A •� • ••:::• • • : • • i 111 .1• • • • • • •1�;••�•�1 •ee• • ♦ • ♦ �•• •• • • • • • •♦•1 •�, • : j••• • •• • 1 • • • i•::•• • • • .• 1�•�. 1' •• •••'�• • :• • • _ • �� 1 •' • �7\• • • • • • •1 •.' m1••• •� •moi • • •� . . . r' .�•0 • : • • • • • • • •'• • • ♦�• •�•�r •� � Up • :::: • • • �•� :• ��•��� •• 1 1 11 • • • • • • 1. ,1� 0::: • ••: •• •1.{J.: •i ••• •••• • •• •• •• �:•• • • ••: •••• •• ••�`•�• C �7 ••:• •1 1• • �• • •' • �, • • •1 ••• •� •� • • • s • • • • i•• i •• ;k f A ••11• ••• Q • • • Y,Ir� ', •.�• •�� • • • P.O. LLIJ •' •••••� S.C.T.M. DISTIST 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3 COMMUNITY SERVICES Existing police protection for the area is provided by the Town of Southold Police Department with a force of over 40. Fire protection is provided by the Cutchogue Fire Depart- ment. This is a voluntary force with personnel of over 100. There is no Town sanitation service in the subject area, therefore, the proposed residential community must hire a private refuse collector. The subject property is located within School District #9 - Mattituck/Cutchogue school district. There are no public water or sewer services present in this area. A well and storage tank will be constructed on site to provide water. Each building will be connected to a septic tank/leaching pool system in order to properly dispose of sani- tary wastes. Recreational Facilities According to the "Suffolk County Planning Department's Data Book, 1984", the Hamlet of Cutchogue is provided with eight (8) nearby recreational facilities. New Suffolk Town Beach, located on Jackson Street and Second Street in New Suffolk, approximately 2 miles south of the pro- posed development, provides area residents with a beach and a launch ramp for boaters. The beach is approximately 1.3 acres in size. Goldsmith Inlet County Park, located on Inlet Road in Peconic, is approximately 3 miles east of the proposed develop- 3-28 ment on the Long Island Sound. This County park provides area residents with biking facilities, nature trails and a playground area. The park is approximately 34 acres in size. Peconic Dunes County Park, located on Soundview Avenue in Peconic, is approximately 4 miles east of the subject property. This 37 acre park provides area residents with biking facili- ties, nature trails, boating facilities, bridal paths and a conservation education program. Goldsmith's Inlet Beach, located on Inlet Road in Peconic, is a 2 acre beach situated approximately 3 miles east of the subject property. Nassau Point Community Beach, located approximately 4 miles southeast of the proposed development on Nassau Point Road in Cutchogue, is a 19.5 acre beach. Area residents are provided with a large beach area, picnic area, playground area and bas- ketball court area. Pequash Avenue Town Park, located on Pequash Avenue in New Suffolk, is situated approximately 2 miles south of the proposed development. This 1-acre park provides area residents with a beach area, picnic area and a playground area. Cedars Golf Club, situated on Cases Avenue in Cutchogue, is a public golf club approximately 1/2 mile south of the proposed development. North Fork Country Club, situated on Main Road in Cutchogue, is a private country club situated approximately 1 mile east of the proposed development. 3-29 DEMOGRAPHICS Several studies have been performed on the pattern and types of development within the County of Suffolk and the Town of Southold. These reports include the "Analysis of Population and Housing" for the Background Studies, Town of Southold Master Plan Update; "Focus on the East End", written by the Suffolk County Inter-Agency Coordinating Council; "Demographic Information", prepared by the Suffolk County Office for the Aging; and the 111988 Population Survey" prepared by the Long Island Lighting Company. As this proposed development will serve the residents of Suffolk County primarily, a brief synopsis of the demographic information within this region will be given. The Nassau- Suffolk region grew rapidly during the 1950's and 19601x. As Nassau County became saturated, Suffolk County saw a great increase in development, both of population and jobs. Suffolk County's population has been steadily increasing; this consis- tent growth has been creating development pressures in eastern Suffolk County, including the Town of Southold. From 1970 to 1980, the number of persons age sixty and older increased from 121,759 to 162, 864. During that time span, the percentage of seniors in the population increased from 11% to 13%. By the year 2010, the population of seniors will have grown to 277,296 or 17% of the County's total population.) Recently, a great influx of retirees have settled in Suffolk County, particularly in the eastern end. This not only adds 1 Demographic Information (see Appendix A) 3-30 significantly to the year-round population but also shifts the age structure of the region. Refer to table in Appendix A. The Town of Southold mirrors the effect of this recent trend. In 1980 37. 3% (more than 1 of every 3 residents) was 55 years or older. In the Nassau- Suffolk region, the percentage of residents 55 years or greater is 20. 6% (1 in every 5 residents) . The changing demographics of Southold have increased the average age of the Town from 36. 6 in 1960 to 40.1 years in 1970 and to over 43 years in 1980. According to the 1988 Population Survey distributed by the Long Island Lighting Company, a synopsis of the demographic information within the Southold area has been developed. As stated in the Population Survey, in 1970 ther population of the Town of Southold was recorded as 16,804. A& of January 1988, the population of the Town of Southold increased to 21, 395, which is an increase of approximately 21% over an 18 year period. During the 18 year period, the Hamlet of Cutchogue increased from 2,718 in 1970 to 3,016 in 1988, for an increase of approximately 10%. The estimated average household size for the Town of Southold was recorded as being 2.54 in 1980 and 2 .50 in 1988. The number of households in the Town increased from 7,461 in 1980 to 8,480 in 1988, for an increase of 12% over the eight year period. According to information received from various discussions with the Suffolk County Planning Board, in the Nassau-Suffolk 3-31 County area, there are 256, 041 retired people at the age of 65 and up. This information was based on social security records and the 1980 census. The number of single retired people at the age of 65 and up is 129,629 and the number of retired couples throughout the Nassau-Suffolk area is 63,206. These figures indicate that roughly half of the retired persons aged 65 and up in the Nassau-Suffolk area are single. In addition to the Suf- folk County Planning Board, information was obtained from the Bureau of Records in Albany. Based on social security records, there are 127, 095 persons aged 65 and up in the Suffolk County area. The number of single retired persons 65 and up in the Suffolk County area is 64,818 and the number of retired 65 and up couples is 31,139. ,Based on these figures, approximately half the number of retired persons aged 65 in Suffolk County and up are single. The proposed project is limited to people 55 years of age and older. According to the Suffolk County Planning Department, the total number of people 55 and over in the Nassau-Suffolk area is 532,842. Of this total, 27, 151 are single, 362,799 are married, 128,870 are widowed and 14, 022 are divorced. The above mentioned figures indicate that approximately 68 percent of people aged 55 and over are married and 32% of the people are single. The Bureau of Records in Albany indicated that in the Suffolk County area, there are 60,585 people in the range between 55 and 59. Between the ages of 60 and 64, there are 3-32 47, 036 and from the age of 65 and up, there are 127, 095. There- fore, the total number of persons aged 55 and up in the Suffolk County area is 244,716. Of this total, 166,407 (68%) are married and approximately 78, 309 (32%) are single. 3-33 VISUAL RESOURCES The proposed development is located within ±1,500' of the downtown business district of the Hamlet of Cutchogue, on the north fork of Long Island. The Hamlet is a typical strip commercial development along Route 25 but contains some historic structures and newly renovated/constructed buildings that give it a district rural town character. There will be no impact on this visual resource from the proposed project. The surrounding area is mostly rural with many existing farms, vineyards, horse ranches, nurseries and other various open space uses. The above uses are visually appealing and they have evolved as a visual resource for the area. To the west of the ,projects is an existing single family development that borders the western property line. These are all fairly new two-story family large dwellings with immature landscaping. The north end of the residential property is bordered by a mature wooded lot, of indigenous oaks, maples and beech. The project site is gently rolling farmed land that has laid fallow a number of years. Second growth reforestation has evolved in the southeast corner of the residential site with emergence of weedy trees, i.e. mostly locust and poplars and other weedy plant material such as briars, blackberries, etc. Grasses and weeds cover most of the remaining site. 3-34 CULTURAL RESOURCES An archeological survey was performed on the subject property and the report may be found in Appendix H at the rear of this DEIS. 3-35 SECTION IV SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS GEOLOGY As discussed earlier in the "Inventory of Existing Environmental Conditions", 75% of the site consists of Haven Series soils, either HaA or HaB. These soils present only slight limitations to their uses as support for homesites or percolation filters for sanitary and drainage leaching flow. The Haven series consists of deep, well drained, medium textured soils. These soils have high to moderate available moisture capacity with low natural fertility. Internal drainage is good with moderate permeability in the substratum. The hazard of erosion is slight to moderate as most slopes range from 0-8 percent. Impacts to the subsurface geology of the subject parcel will be minor. Because of the nature of the soils on site (medium to coarse textured for draining) , it is expected that material excavated for the construction of basements, catch basins and ponds will be suitable for use as a road subbase. As can be seen from the Grading and Site Plan (located in the Rear Sleeve A) , most of the existing site is relatively flat with slopes ranging from 0 to 13%. Small portions of the site, especially in the northeastern section of the property, have natural slopes in the 20% range. During construction, several measures will be taken to re- duce the potential of erosion. These include the placement of hay mulch on steep slopes and the installation of silt fences to trap any sediment. After construction, all slopes that exceed 4-1 12% will have jute mesh installed that will allow the placement of ground cover and low lying shrubs. These plants will permanently stabilize the slopes and eliminate any potential severe erosion problems. Construction of roads, driveways, buildings and ponds will necessitate the removal of topsoil from these areas of the site. All topsoil which is stripped to facilitate construction will be stockpiled on site to be reused for the development of landscaped areas and to stabilize those slopes which have been disturbed. The proposed roadway profiles have been developed to conform as closely as possible to the existing terrain. The average proposed cut and fill depths on the property range from 0 to 3 feet. The maximum cut is approximately 8 feet at the location of one of the retention ponds. The maximum fill is 16 feet at one location due to the proposed development of a landscaped buffer mound off of Hamlet Way to the north of the property. As shown on the plan, the proposed grading of the property retains all rain runoff on site. The only proposed slopes that are greater than 10$ are near the community center roadway and on the landscaped screening berms developed to create a feeling of privacy for the residential units. As previously mentioned, all slopes will be adequately stabilized with ground cover to minimize any erosion. 4-2 GROUNDWATER Development of the project site will have two, largely distinct, areas of impact; the first from water supply well pumpage and the second from disposal of sanitary waste and site drainage. These two impact areas will be discussed in that order. Preliminary engineering for water supply for the site was conducted during the planning for a previously submitted development scheme. This report is applicable, also, to the present proposal, and is presented in the appendix. The pro- posed water supply system calls for two wells, with a capacity of 50 gallons per minute (gpm) each. Also included is a 100,000 gallon storage capacity to meet peak hour demands, projected at 225 gpm. The water supply facility will include a protection zone with a 200 foot radius to protect against contamination. Testing of the exploratory well demonstrated that lowering of the water table at the wells will be minimal, and the resulting cone of influence, or depression, from the well pumping will be entirely contained within the zone of protection. Under these circumstances, there will be no upconing or intrusion of saline water, and the well will not influence adjacent wells or be ef- fected by adjacent wastewater disposal systems, farm chemicals, or highway deicing salts. The water quality impact of sanitary waste disposal and surface runoff is of concern and must be evaluated. The major concern regarding wastewater disposal is nitrogen loading of the 4-3 groundwater. Nitrate contamination is a serious problem in the Town of Southold, as indicated earlier, due to the extensive agricultural use of fertilizer. With this in mind, a wastewater disposal system has been designed for the project. Due to the importance of precisely determining the nitrogen impacts of the project, an extensive analysis, based on a high level of pre- cision, was undertaken for this DEIS. This nitrogen budget ana- lysis is based on the Cornell University Water and Land Resource Analysis System (WALRAS) , which provides a methodology for pre- dicting impacts of land use on nitrate and other runoff/recharge factors. The inputs to the model are based on data presented in vari- ous sources, and the derivation of various inputs are described in detail in the paragraphs below. The complete computer output from the model is included in the appendix. Nitrogen is an important factor, due to health impacts at high concentrations in drinking water, and due to the potential for cultural eutrophication of surface water. The health con- sideration has resulted in the establishment of a to mg/l ni- trate standard for groundwater suitable as a source of potable water supply. The nitrate concentration in recharge water is a function of various inputs, including sewage, pet wastes, and fertilizer, both for agricultural and residential lawns, all of which is diluted by the water budget consisting of precipita- tion, domestic water use, and lawn irrigation. The techniques developed for WALRAS have been used to forecast groundwater 4-4 impacts of development of Long Island Pine Barrens areas. This use is particularly applicable to the project because it focuses on the Carver and Plymouth Sands soil association, which has similar hydrological characteristics to the Haven soils found on the site. It should be noted that several of the model assumptions will result in conservative (i.e. overestimates) predictions of groundwater nitrate concentrations. For the purpose of this analysis, nitrate is assumed to be extremely conservative, that is, its concentration does not diminish once it passes below the root zone. The individual input parameters used in this analysis are presented in the following paragraphs: Precipitation. The rainfall input to groundwater is a func- tion of total precipitation minus evaporative losses. The mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation for the area are 51°F (10°C) and 45.97 inches (116.76 cm) , respectively. Total evapotranspiration, or evaporative loss of water from soil, plant, and other surfaces, and plant tissues, can be estimated in the following manner: Bio-temperature = sum of mean monthly temperatures which are greater than 0°C divided by 12. The bio-temperature on Long Island is about 10°C. Evapotranspiration (mm) = bio-temperature (CO ) x 58.93. This means that 589. 3 mm, or 23.2 inches of our annual pre- cipitation, is unavailable for recharge to surface or ground- waters in this area. This analysis applies only to precipi- 4-5 tation which falls on permeable surfaces. For impervious surfaces, including roof and pavement, it has been determined that 90% of total precipitation is recharged to groundwater (WALRAS) . Domestic Water Use. Water use in the United States varies dramatically, with an established range of from 40 to 500 gallons per person per day. For this analysis, a use rate of 150 gallons per dwelling unit per day was used, which is the design sewage flow rate for a planned retirement community as determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Irrigation. Total annual irrigation of 5.5 inches per year contributed to groundwater from landscaped and turfed areas was taken directly from WALRAS. , Fertilizer. For fertilizer applied to turfed areas, the total groundwater contribution of 64 pounds per acre annually was also taken from WALRAS. For this analysis, the 33.9 acres of permeable area was used with the assumption that 10.56 of these acres will be landscape beds. It is also assumed that vegetation native to the area, tolerant of arid conditions and acidic soils, including red cedars, rhododendrons, and azelias, which do not need or receive annual fertilizer, will be used. This leaves 22 acmes of turf which will contribute fertilizer nitrate. Animals and Pets. The average of 6.5 pounds per acre annual- ly, also from WALRAS, is used here. It should be noted, how- ever, in accordance with the 208 plan, dog control ordinances 4-6 are becoming more common. In a planned community such as this, it is quite likely that the homeowners association would impose such a requirement, and all but eliminate this nitrate source. Sewage. An annual contribution per capita of 10 pounds, of which 15% reaches groundwater after atmospheric release was used for this analysis. The nitrate levels were calculated for three development scenarios: 160, 156 and 152 units. The average density used was 1.33 persons per unit, which is appropriate for a planned retirement community. Conclusions. Using the above inputs and assumptions, the budget analysis results in the following estimates for nitrate concentrations in recharge groundwater from the project site. Units Nitrate (mg/1.) 160 6.42 156 6. 38 152 6. 35 It should be noted that even the minimal nitrogen reduction which would be achieved by density reduction is somewhat over- estimated by this analysis, because the reduction would open up a greater amount of turf and landscape area, allowing greater evapotranspiration and requiring additional lawn fertilizer. The model runs for this analysis were not refined this sensi- tively. However, it can be concluded that the nitrate levels in recharge water from the proposed project will be within the ac- ceptable limits of 10 mg/1, and that density reduction does not significantly reduce nitrate levels. 4-7 The precision, or confidence limits, of any model is a summa- tion of the cumulative variances of the particular input parame- ters. In the case of nitrogen budget analysis, the input parame- ters characteristically exhibit high variance. For example, in August, our wettest month, precipitation at Central Park, New York, has ranged from 10.86 inches, in 1955, down to 0.24 inches in 1964. Obviously such input variance can greatly effect the nitrogen concentration. A brief analysis of variance is pre- sented in the WALRAS document, where it indicates that an aver- age nitrate concentration of 6 mg/l has a 90% probability of not exceeding the 10 mg/l standard, which probability increases to 99% at an average level of 3 mg/1. The predicted level for this project, therefore, 6.4 mg/1, would have an approximate 90% pro- bability of not exceeding 10 mg/1. The drainage facilities proposed for this project provide for on site retention of all storm water runoff, including park- ing areas and roofs. The proposed system will allow for the recharge of virtually all of the precipitation falling on the project site to the underlying aquifer system. In this sense, the natural drainage pattern of precipitation and on site recharge with little or no runoff, will be maintained, although reduced evapotranspiration will allow greater quantities of recharge. Another area of concern, with respect to groundwater qual- ity, is the possibility of degradation caused by substances carried into the ground with the recharge water. Storm water runoff from pavement surfaces has been found to be contaminated with coliform and other bacteria, nutrients, heavy metals, 4-8 hydrocarbons and pesticides. In fact, stormwater runoff is the major source of bacterial loading to surface waters in Suffolk and Nassau Counties. This tenet was recently reconfirmed by the research performed in conjunction with the Long Island segment of the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) , which explored alternatives for the disposal of stormwater from urbanized surfaces. It has been further demonstrated, however, that because streets and highways serve as collection systems for urban and suburban land runoff, the total loading of pollutants from a pavement surface often reflects the watershed area char- acteristics rather than the pavement surface. For example, nutrients and pesticides in runoff can be traced to nearby agri- cultural or landscaped area$ where these chemicals are applied. The roof and pavement surfaces on the project site, unlike highways, will not collect runoff from a wider area. This fact greatly reduces the potential stormwater contamination to minor loads of hydrocarbons and rubber products from vehicles, deicing salts and rarely, pet wastes. This relatively small pollutant loading will be carried into the leaching system, where reten- tion will allow partial chemical and biological treatment to occur, while remaining contaminants will leach into the soil. The NURP determined conclusively that the most appropriate storm- water runoff disposal alternative is discharge to a leaching recharge system. The project site contains 50 feet of sand filtering capacity for the recharge water, which will assure 4-9 that the runoff is scrubbed to a drinkable quality prior to entering the groundwater. As such, the project is fully con- sistent with the findings and recommendations of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program. 4-10 VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Vegetation on the property will be altered by direct removal and replacement with a more ordered landscape. No endangered, threatened, or New York State Heritage list species will be impacted. The open space areas remaining after construction will be reseeded and replanted, but will be maintained in a shorter condition by mowing. As the landscaping matures and fills in, most of the species currently using the property will return and resume nesting on the site. Habitat value for ground- nesting species, such as Common Bobwhite and Ring-necked Pheas- ant will be reduced somewhat, but they will continue to be com- mon on the property, making optimal use of fringes and buffers. The introduction of residences such as this are generally accompanied by individuals who maintain feeders throughout the winter months. Approximately one in five residents can be ex- pected to enjoy this pasttime. This change in food availability will increase the numbers and species diversity on the project site, resulting in large numbers of overwintering sparrows, blackbirds, titmice, nuthatches and others. The area may then become more attractive to the areas sharp-shinned hawks and kestrels. The commercial site, like the residential area, will dis- place the vegetation and wildlife currently using the site. However, this site will not be providing enough vegetated area to encourage the return of the wildlife. Also, the frequency of traffic to this site will be high enough to discourage the return of nesting wildlife. 4-11 LAND USE AND ZONING As stated in a previous section, the subject parcel is currently vacant land as is some of the land in the immediate area. An impact of construction of the proposed project will be a loss of open space. This will be addressed in the section on mitigation. The zoning of the residential parcel is "M" Light-Multiple Residence and is not included in any town master plan as a pro- posed open space district. Project design is in compliance with current and proposed future zoning regulations and will feature a traditional archi- tectural style which will not only be in harmony with existing structures within the reg}on, but also serve as a precedent for future projects of this type. 4-12 COMMUNITY SERVICES Police Protection - The Town of Southold police department's staff of 43 consists of 36 officers and 7 civilians. This force is augmented by an additional bay constable and four or five part time officers during the tourist season. The station, built in 1971, is centrally located in Peconic and contains offices, two detention cells and houses the communi- cations system. Equipment includes 17 vehicles and several boats for bay constable use. NY State Department of Commerce estimates place the project- ed town population at 23, 000 year round residents by the year 1990. From Municipal Police Administration data for cities having population in the 19,000-25, 000 range, an average of 1. 68 persons (including uniformed and civilian support staff) are needed per 1, 000 population. Using this criterion, a population of 23 , 000 would require a police force of approximately 39 per- sons. The current staff of 43 appears to be more than adequate to handle the towns current need for police protection and will not be adversely affected by the addition of 213 new persons to the towns population (160 units of housing x 1. 33 persons/ unit) . While not overtaxing the current year round police pro- tection needs, the increased tax revenue derived from develop- ment of the subject property will help to defray the cost of hiring the additional seasonal staff needed during the summer months when the towns population grows to over 36,000 persons. If at some point in the future, population increases do require 4-13 the hiring of additional year round police personnel, the cur- rent facilities are sufficient to accommodate some expansion. ) Additionally, the applicant is proposing to retain the services of a security firm to protect the tenants of this development 24 hours a day. Fire Protection - For the purposes of fire protection the Town of Southold is divided into seven fire districts. The Cutchogue fire district has one station, centrally located within the hamlet. Built in the 1920'x, renovated and enlarged several times, it houses a 24 hour dispatcher. The district owns 9 vehicles and relies on pumper/tankers, pump trucks and portable pumps for water supply. As in other areas of the town, water supply is a major problem2 due to the fact that many areas do not have public water, and in those areas that do, mains are often old and pressure is inadequate. A substation, east of the current firehouse, is being con- sidered to better serve the Nassau Point area. The volunteer force of 100 persons appears to be adequate when one considers that a city of similar size would only require a full time force of only 30. This figure is derived from Municipal Fire Administration data which shows that 1, 211 cities throughout the country had a median number of 1.29 full time fire department personnel per 1,000 population. 1 Analysis of Community Services, Raymond, Parish, Pine and 2 Weiner Planning Consultants Analysis of Community Service RPPW 4-14 As stated previously, the fire station is centrally located, near to the proposed Hamlet at Cutchogue Project, and has been expanded and renovated several times to house new equipment. According to victor Lessade of the Cutchogue Fire Department, the construction of 160 senior citizen units will not have an impact on rescue service to the proposed community. According to Mr. Lessade, "there are over 100 people in the fire department, with ambulance service approximately 1-1/2 blocks from the site. If a major fire were to happen, the Cutchogue Fire Department can call for aid to any of the other fire depart- ments in the area. " The only potential impact of concern that may be caused by construction of the proposed project is an increase demand for water for fire fighting purposes. This will he addressed in the section on mitigating measures. Health Care - In terms of analyzing the impacts upon exist- ing health care facilities in the area, one can use as a general rule of thumb that one hospital bed is needed for every 200 per- son increase in population. The size of the proposed "Hamlet at Cutchoguell project, 160 units, will result in a year round popu- lation increase of approximately 213 persons. Such an increase will result in a need for 2 additional hospital beds. The eastern Suffolk area is currently served by three hospi- tals including Central Suffolk, a 157 bed facility in Riverhead, Eastern Long Island Hospital in Greenport which has 66 beds and the 194 bed Southampton Hospital on the south fork in Southamp- 4-15 ton Township. Each of the three facilities has 24 hour ambula- tory emergency service, an intensive care unit, cardiac care unit, psychiatric unit and radiology. Outpatient facilities are also found at Eastern Long Island Hospital. While the occupancy rate at Central Suffolk Hospital is high, approximately 94%, the rates of occupancy at Eastern Long Island and Southampton Hospitals are 66% and 77% respectively, among the lowest for the 37 largest hospitals on Long Island.3 In addition to these facilities, San Simeon-by-the-Sound, a 150 bed, not-for-profit corporation on North Road in the unin- corporated portion of Greenport, provides skilled nursing care and other health related facilities. In the Town of Riverhead, the Riverhead Nursing Home has 121 skilled nursing beds and 60 health related facility beds. Addi- tionally, Central Suffolk Hospital has received permission to add 60 skilled nursing beds and Southampton Hospital plans to acquire a 62 bed nursing home. Regionally, St. Charles Hospital in Port Jefferson has sub- mitted a proposal to add a 200 bed geriatric facility and the Suffolk County Infirmary in Yaphank has 215 skilled nursing beds and is available to all County residents. In the light of the number of existing and proposed facili- ties in the area and their levels of use, a population increase of 213 senior citizens should not adversely impact the health care system. 3 1987 Long Island Almanac 4-16 Solid Waste Disposal - It will be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association to retain the services of a private carter to collect solid refuse from the residents. The two major carting services in the Town of Southold are Mattituck Sanitation and Northfork Sanitation. According to discussions with the Town of Southold, there will be minimal impact on the sanitary landfills with the construction of the proposed develop- ment. Recreation Facilities - As stated earlier, the Hamlet of Cutchogue and its surrounding area has several recreational facilities which are near the proposed development. The resi- dents of this senior citizen development will have on site amenities such as tennis,courts, a recreational building and a swimming pool. Due to the number of existing recreational facilities throughout the surrounding Cutchogue area, the on-site amenities, and the nature of senior citizen recreational activities, it can be concluded that there will be minimal impact upon the existing community recreational facilities. 4-17 VISUAL RESOURCES Reduced visual quality will primarily be for the group of viewers from the existingsubdivision to the west of the pro- posed project site and from the passing motorists that utilize both Schoolhouse Lane and Griffing Street. After the landscaped buffer and the interior landscaping throughout the development is accomplished, there will be mini- mal impact upon viewers from Cutchogue Hamlet. Also, the archi- tectural theme for the project will be designed to reflect the surrounding community as well as establishing a variety of units. 4-18 CULTURAL RESOURCES Construction of the project will result in the generation of noise which will be audible from adjacent properties. Typical- ly, construction of residential subdivisions including site work and building erection can be expected to provide sound levels at the property line of 70 decibels, when measured in terms of L10, or noise level exceeded a maximum of ten percent of the time. It should be noted that this noise is temporary in nature, only occurring during construction periods, and more importantly, will be restricted to the normal daytime working hours. Also of concern is the potential for generation of fugitive dust during the earthwork and grading phases of the project. If it appears that dust is becoming a problem, appropriate measures will be taken, including the application of water and/or calcium chloride to the exposed earth surfaces. Furthermore, the con- tractor will be expected to stabilize regraded surfaces as quickly as possible with appropriate vegetation. A tax assessment for the project was prepared by the Board of Assessors Department of the Town of Southold. As shown on the chart in Appendix I, it was assumed that the assessment value for each 750 square foot 2-story condo unit is $5,000 and the assessment value for each 1,500 square foot ranch with garage unit is $4,700. Therefore, the total assessment for the units alone was determined to be $776, 000. The land surrounding the units was assessed at $800 per unit for a total assessment value of $128, 000. The total assessment value, including the 4-19 land and units for the entire project is determined to be $904, 000. The total tax generation for the entire project based on a tax rate of $503 per $1, 000 of assessment value is deter- mined to be $454,700 for the 1989-90 year. Each 2-story condo unit will generate approximately $3,200 per year in taxes and each ranch with garage unit will generate approximately $2, 800 per year. In conclusion, this 160-unit proposed project, that will house people 55 years of age and older, will generate approxi- mately $454,700 in taxes per year for the Town of Southold. As shown in previous sections of this DEIS, the construction of this senior citizen development will have a minimal impact on the community's existing ,services. Due to the nature of the project and its residents, the population of school children in Southold and the traffic volumes on local roadways should not increase in proportion to the project's contribution to the Town's tax base. 4-20 SECTION V MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY As mentioned previously, impacts to the topography and sub- surface geology of the residential site will be minor. Proposed grading will follow existing terrain as closely as possible. Shortly after construction is completed on each phase, areas will be replanted with grass or other suitable ground cover to prevent erosion. Steep slope areas, where disturbed, will be regraded at a flatter slope and stabilized with vegetation. It is anticipated from the soil types found on both sites, most of which are granular and free draining, that materials excavated for the construction of footings and foundations can be used as subbase and fill for roads and parking areas. Top- soil, which must be removed prior to constructing roads, walks and building foundations, will be stockpiled on site. It will then be placed in areas where the existing topsoil cover is thin to establish lawns and gardens. 5-1 WATER RESOURCES As discussed previously, development of the project site will impact upon groundwater in two distinct ways; from water supply well pumpage and from disposal of sanitary waste and storm water runoff. In order to mitigate impacts caused by pumpage, the design includes a 100, 000 gallon storage tank. The purpose of this facility is to allow for the use of pumps having a low pumping rate (50 gpm) . This helps to reduce the drawdown and cone of influence of the well, which minimizes the possibility of salt water intrusion, degradation of water quality from sanitary systems and road deicing salts and impacts upon neighboring wells. The water storage tank enables the system to meet the peak hour demands estimated at 225 gpm without having to actual- ly withdraw water from the aquifer at this rate. A second factor which helps to mitigate the impacts caused by pumpage is the limiting of occupancy to senior citizens, a group having a lower water usage than the general public. This decreases water demand, resulting in reduced pumpage and associ- ated impacts. In terms of mitigating impacts from disposal of sanitary and storm water runoff, the following measures have been taken. A 200 foot radius protection zone has been established to assure that effluent from sanitary systems and pollutant contami- nated stormwater runoff do not enter the proposed water supply system. 5-2 In addition, all runoff will be retained on site and re- charged to the ground by means of natural recharge areas. This will allow the water to pass through 50 ' or more of sand, as- suring its quality before reaching the aquifer. As stated earlier, recharge will actually be greater following construc- tion of the proposed project due to the net reduction of vege- tated areas and subsequent reduction in evapotranspiration. A final mitigating measure will be the continuous disinfec- tion of the water supply by chloration. 5-3 LAND USE AND ZONING As mentioned in the section regarding impacts to land use and zoning, an impact upon land use as a result of construction of the proposed project will be loss of open space. Several measures have been taken to mitigate this impact. One such measure has been to cluster dwellings together in groups, leaving large open areas between structures. This type of development gives more of a sense of openness than would be experienced if the units were spread out over the entire site, each on its own lot. Another mitigation measure which has been incorporated into the site plan is the inclusion of a landscaped buffer around the property. Using species Vhich are native to the area will fos- ter a natural, undisturbed appearance on site while requiring a minimum of fertilization and water use. This landscaped buffer will also shield the project from neighboring residences, there- by creating for each parcel an atmosphere of privacy. The land- scaped buffer will consist of the following species: Redtwig dogwood, Evergreen trees, Forsythia, Viburnum Carlesi, Winter- berry, Summersweet, Serviceberry and Pussywillow. A detail of this buffer, and the arrangement of the different types of species is depicted on the Grading and Site Plan in the rear sleeve of this report. 5-4 COMMUNITY SERVICES An impact to community services is found in the area of fire protection or more specifically, water supply for fire fighting purposes. Water mains are absent throughout many parts of the Town of Southold. Many of the mains that are present are old and the water pressure in them is inadequate for fire fighting. The construction of a 100, 000 gallon water storage tank for the proposed project, in addition to mitigating other impacts addressed earlier, will provide a reliable source of water for fire protection. Because of the location of the proposed pro- ject, near the center of the hamlet, this source of water may not only prove valuable for fire fighting within the proposed complex, but also for fighting fires in the neighboring residen- tial areas to the west and east and commercial area to the south. The centralized location of the project is, in itself, a mitigating measure. It allows easy access to shopping, and public transportation reducing the need for reliance upon private transportation. A final mitigating measure to impacts on community services is the inclusion of a recreation center containing a swimming pool, tennis courts; and club house. While this complex is not expected, or intended, to meet all of the recreational needs of the residents of the project, it will help to lessen the impact upon existing town facilities. 5-5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual Resources a. The architectural theme for the project will be designed to reflect the historic architecture of the surrounding communities as well as maintaining a variety among the units themselves. b. All graphics and lighting in the senior citizen's residence project will be low keyed residential type with low impact design. Mounting heights of lights to be limited to 181 , downlights and glare restricted with the use of high pressure sodium fixtures. c. Visual impacts as identified above for the neighbors to the west will be significantly reduced by a landscaped buffer approximately 25' deep around the entire pro- perty. These will be primarily evergreen trees of species indigenous to Long Island and the east end, i.e. Redtwig Dogwood, Forsythia, Winterberry, Pussywillow, etc. For screening of objectionable views, i.e. around dumpsters and other mechanical equipment, fast growing evergreen plant material will be proposed, i.e. Japanese pine, spruce, fir and hemlocks. d. There will be a 150' buffer in the northwest corner of the lot to reduce the visual impact on the neighbors. This is also the area where existing indigenous vege- tation is prospering. This buffer will remain natural. 5-6 SECTION VI UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE EFFECTS UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE EFFECTS The subject parcel has few critical impact areas. No rare, threatened or endangered floral or faunal species have been ob- served, and none are anticipated because of the previous agri- cultural use of the property. Existing vegetation consists mostly of grasses and there are no surface bodies of water on or near the site. No unsuitable organic soils were found, nothing of historical interest is present, and no noise or air quality problems exist. The terrain can generally be described as rol- ling with few steep slope areas. Water supply will be provided for through the use of an on site well field and 100, 000 gallon storage tank which mitigates the impact of pumpage from the aquifer. Sanitary waste, will be disposed of using a standard septic tank/leaching system. As with any type of development, there will necessarily be a loss of open space. Land use plans have been developed for the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk and both have estab- lished tracts of land within their jurisdiction to be used as open space. The subject parcel is not included in any proposed open space areas and has, in fact, been zoned for residential use. The site plan for the proposed development arranges dwel- lings in clusters to preserve as much open space as possible and mitigate this impact. Another unavoidable adverse impact is the addition of nitro- gen to the groundwater. As detailed in a previous section on groundwater impacts, the estimated nitrate concentration in re- charge groundwater for the proposed project is 6.4 mg/liter. 6-1 If the site were used for agricultural purposes, levels as high as 10 mg/l could be expected. These numbers are estimates based upon the growing of vegetables and potatoes respectively.) if the site were to be used as a nursery, concentrations as high as 13.20 mg/l could be expected. Therefore, while use of this site for residential purposes will impact nitrogen concentrations in the groundwater, this impact is less than the impact to be ex- pected if the site were used for agriculture purposes. In addi- tion, use of the site for agricultural purposes would also re- sult in a heavier contribution of pesticides and herbicides to the groundwater than would be expected for a residential site. This project will also require both short-term and long-term expenditures of various kids of energy. In the short-term, the energy consumption will be caused by the construction operations directly. This will involve electricity and various fuels for operating tools and machinery either directly or indirectly, i.e. , fuel consumption of trucks delivering building materials. Long-term energy consumption will involve primarily the electri- city and fuel used in the normal occupancy of a residential com- plex. The design and construction of the buildings will take into consideration all of the latest advances in fuel efficient build- ing technology. Use of such things as superior insulation and double glazed windows will all be maximized to the fullest ex- tent to reduce the amount of energy consumed. 1 Land Use and Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton, Water Resources Program Center for Environ- mental Research, Cornell University. 6-2 SECTION VII ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY Under the regulations of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in the absence of a public sewer system, there are three types of subsurface sewage disposal systems in which sewage effluent may be disposed. They are: the Sewage Treat- ment Plant, the Denitrification System, and the Conventional Septic Tank/Leaching Pool System. These three systems will be discussed in order to assess the feasibility of each system and the impact each system has on the environment. Sewage Treatment Plant. Under the 1984 Standards for Subsur- face Sewage Disposal Systems for Other than Single-Family Resi- dences, which. are in effect at the time of this writing, a sew- age treatment plant is rQquired when the allowable flow is ex- ceeded by the actual flow design. As stated previously the design flow, using the Yield Map Method, is equivalent to the allowable flow; therefore it is not required to install a sewage treatment plant for the proposed project. If one were to be installed, several acres will need to be utilized for the construction of a sewage treatment plant. Many of the sewage plants constructed today are not aesthetically pleasing to the surrounding area, and most release unwelcomed odors to the environment. Aside from being expensive to con- struct (approximately $20-$22 per gallon of flow) , a sewage treatment plant must also be maintained by an experienced worker in sewage treatment plants. 7-1 Denitrification System. Under the current Health Department regulation, if the allowable flow is exceeded, a modified subsur- face sewage disposal system (Denitrification System) may be utilized as an acceptable measure of disposing sewage, providing that the total design flow from the project does not exceed 15, 000 gallons of sewage per day and the property is not zoned residential. As previously stated in an earlier section, the design sewage flow rate for this Senior Citizen Community pro- ject exceeds 15,000 gallons, therefore under Health Department regulations, it is not acceptable to install a denitrification system. Conventional Septic Tank/Leaching Pool System. Under the current regulations of toe Suffolk County Department of Health Services, a conventional septic tank/leaching pool system can be utilized when the design flow for a project is either equivalent to or below the allowable flow for that project. For this pro- ject, by using the Yield Map Method for determining the allow- able flow, the design sewage flow is equivalent to the allowable flow thereby allowing a conventional septic tank/leaching pool system to be utilized. The installation of a conventional septic tank/leaching pool system is easier to be maintained versus the previously men- tioned systems. The system is more reliable, cheaper to install and easier to maintain than either a sewage treatment plant or a denitrification system. It is also an acceptable method of sewage disposal under the current Health Department regulations. 7-2 ALTERNATIVE SCALE Presently, the current zoning allows for a 4 unit per acre density on the subject parcel which would allow for the construc- tion of up to 184 units. An alternative to this density is to decrease the density to 3 units per acre, which yields a total of 138 units versus the proposed 160 units. A comparison be- tween the proposed 160 unit development and a 138 unit develop- ment has been established in a chart as follows: NUMBER OF UNITS 160 138 Nitrogen Loading 6.42 mg/1 6.40 mg/l Landscaping 7. 0 acres 5.84 acres Impervious Area 12.50 acres 9. 62 acres Natural Areas 1. 11 acres 2.20 acres Turf Areas 24.95 acres 28.50 acres Amenities Will be included Will not be included (Pool, Community Center, Tennis Courts) Due to a decrease of 22 units from the proposed project, the buffer area along the property line would be increased. There would be an increase in open space and natural areas due to the loss of 22 units. See Site Plan in rear sleeve. It should be noted that the reduced scale plan does not result in a signi- ficant decrease in groundwater nitrogen loading. This is pri- marily due to the increase in permeable, vegetated areas which results from deleting 22 units from the plan. The net increase in evapotranspiration alters the water budget and provides less nitrogen dilution. 7-3 Existing community services are adequate to support a planned development of any size and while traffic volumes will be slightly reduced, this will not occur to a degree which will change the no-build level of services of nearby streets. (See Traffic Impact Study. ) Loss of space, could be mitigated somewhat by decreasing the size of the project. A smaller number of units could be clus- tered in such a way that larger open areas will remain thereby retaining more of the rural character of the community. The reduction of project size while providing only minimal benefits creates four additional adverse effects. By reducing the size of the project, land costs must now be spread among a fewer number of units, thereby raising the selling price of each. This is often a critical factor for senior citizens who are living on a fixed income. Additionally, there are fewer units available to help meet the growing need for senior citizen housing in Eastern Suffolk County and in the Town of Southold. Thirdly, a reduction in the size of the project will result in less tax revenue for the Town. This would be an acceptable alternative, and indeed desirable, if such a decrease in project scope would result in significant environmental benefits. Finally, of great significance is the reduction in project size may result in a reduction of total loss of planned ameni- ties due to unacceptable increased cost to the property owners in the areas of construction and carrying expenses. 7-4 ALTERNATIVE DESIGN In 1984, the proposed layout of the 160 units (4 units per dwelling) was approved by the Town of Southold Building Department. This layout included a 150 foot setback from the adjacent parcel to the north to allow the retention of existing vegetation in that area. All setback requirements, including distances between buildings, distances from property lines and distances from roadways were adhered to on the plans. After discussions with the Town, it was suggested to reduce the amount of impervious area by creating shared driveways. This can be accomplished by relocating each garage and developing T-shaped driveways. Due to the status of this project, the reshaping of the driveways and other *inor suggestions by the Town have not yet been incorporated on the included site plan. These, and all other comments, will be addressed upon formal site plan review. Increasing the number of units per dwelling could provide the project with more open space. Increasing the number of units per dwelling though would increase the frontage of each building to a length greater than 125 feet. Although there would be fewer buildings on the site, the buildings would be larger and therefore more difficult to be placed on the property in order to conform to existing topography. Because it is ex- tremely undesirable to construct 2nd floor units in a Senior Citizen development, 6- or 8-unit buildings would lack the pri- vacy of the smaller 4-unit buildings and would also create a "garden apartment" atmosphere on the property. 7-5 ALTERNATIVE SITE In assessing the possibility of use of an alternative site, the following factors regarding the proposed site must be kept in mind. The proposed site lies near the center of a water budget area, thereby allowing for construction of a water supply well which shall provide a suitable yield for a project of this size. This is an important concern since public water is not readily available in many areas of the Town. The proposed site is centrally located with respect to the Hamlet of Cutchogue. This allows for easier access to shopping areas. Additionally, this is in conformance with suggestions made by the Towns' planning consultant to limit development to central areas thereby leaving open space between hamlets and reinforcing a "sense of place" . Additionally, there is no other site in the Hamlet of Cutchogue which fulfills the objectives as delineated in past and present Master Plans of the Town. Lastly, the proposed site is currently zoned Hamlet Density and requires no change of zoning. To be considered, any alternative site must, as a minimum requirement, meet the criteria listed above and in addition have other significant features which make it a more attractive site for development. 7-6 NO ACTION No development of the site would obviously not have any environmental impact upon the existing wildlife, vegetation, hydrology, surface waters, or traffic. The site would remain in its present undeveloped state. The no development alternative, though, would leave unful- filled the obvious need of senior citizen housing in this area. It would be inconsistent with the intended use of the property and contrary to the findings and recommendations shown in past and present Master Plans. 7-7 SECTION VIII IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES The proposed project does not involve simply a short-term use of committed resources. Wood, steel, concrete, and glass building structures can be expected to last 100 years or more and can even be rebuilt on the same site, if necessary or desired. There will be minimal removal of vegetation from the site as only a small amount of vegetation existed before construction began. However, to create an aesthetically pleasing site, a substantial amount of planting will be installed in conjunction with the development of this project. Development of this project will irreversibly and irretriev- ably commit the short-te:�m use of various resources during the construction period. These include the use of electricity for operating tools and machinery and for lighting; the use of gas, oil, and diesel fuel for operating construction equipment and for the delivery of building materials; and the human resources of manpower for the construction itself. Long-term commitment of building materials including wood, concrete, steel, glass, and others, will also be necessary for the development of this project. The quantity of these materials and energy committed will be in keeping with those used for the development of high quality residences. 8-1 SECTION IX GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS Population - Construction of the proposed project will re- sult in an approximate increase of 1.6% in the population in the Town of Southold. These projected increases are due in whole to the construction of new housing. There may be an additional smaller population increase brought about as a result of new businesses coming into the area to serve the newly increased population. This secondary increase would be expected to be insignificant however, when compared to that cause directly by the construction of new residences. SuRport Facilities - As stated in a previous section regard- ing impacts to community services, the existing police, fire and health care as well as school facilities are adequate to handle the anticipated demands of the proposed development. However, area retail stores such as those selling food, clothing, etc. or service oriented businesses such as haircutters, dry cleaners and automotive repair centers might feel a need to expand their businesses, thereby, requiring new personnel. This could indirectly lead, as stated in the previous section, to an additional population increase above that of the 220+ new inhabitants of the proposed project. The commercial project will provide a place for local businesses to expand should the need arise or for new business to locate in the area. Development Potential - Construction of the proposed project will not lead to further growth in the area because of improve- ments to the existing infrastructure. All improvements are to be on site, with no improvements planned to any existing road or utilities. 9-1 REFERENCES LIST OF REFERENCES "Master Plan Update". Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, Inc. , Tarrytown, New York, April, 1983 . "Suffolk County Department of Health Services Regulations for Sewage Disposal for Other Than Single Family Residences, 1984 Standards". "Soil Survey of Suffolk County" . Soil Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture. "North Fork Water Supply Plan". ERM - Northeast/Camp Dresser and McKee, 1983 . "Suffolk County Groundwater Contour Map". Suffolk County Depart- ment of Health Services, March 1989. "People and Parks". Suffolk County Planning Commission. "Code of the Town of Southold", revised 1989. "Town of Southold Comprehensive Development Plan" . Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, Inc. , 1984. "Suffolk County Planning Department's Data Book". 1984. 111988 Population Survey" . Long Island Lighting Company, 1988. "Analysis of Community Services". Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, April 1983. New York State Codes, Rules, and Regulations, Title 6, Chapter X, Parts 700-705, "Water Quality Regulations, Surface Water and Groundwater Classifications and Standards" Section 703 .5. Hughes, Henry and Porter, Keith; "Land Use and Ground Water Qual- ity on the Pine Barrens of Southampton" Water Resources Program, Cornell University, November 1983. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, "Climate of New York" Climatography of the United States No. 60; National Cli- matic Center, Asheville NC 1978. Linsley, R. , and Iranzini, J. , "Water Resources Engineering" McGraw Hill, 1964, Page 425. Nassau-Suffolk Regional Planning Board, 11208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management" Report component titles "Animal Waste, Nassau and Suffolk Counties, New York. " Porter, Keith, et. al. , "Nitrogen on Long Island: Sources and Fate" Cornell University 1978. SUPPLEMENT I PROPOSED USE OF 7-ACRE BUSINESS PROPERTY COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA PREPARED FOR: NOCRO, LTD. MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK PREPARED BY: GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. 325 WEST MAIN STREET BABYLON, NEW YORK 11702 OCTOBER 1988 REVISED JUNE 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Existing Environmental Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Existing Land Use and Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Project Need, Benefits and Objectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Design and Layout. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Construction Impacts. . . . . . . z . . . . . . 0 . 0 . . . . . . 9 . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Traffic Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1 - Location Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Figure 2 - Property Line Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 3 - Hamlet of Cutchogue Land Use Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 4 - Conceptual Layout Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 INTRODUCTION As requested by the Town of Southold in their review of the proposed development of the Hamlet at Cutchogue senior citizen community, an analysis has been prepared for the possible devel- opment of the 7. 1 acre parcel of land adjacent to and south of the proposed Hamlet of Cutchogue project. Although the applicant has no immediate plans of construction on the parcel, a discussion of a rough concept of development would provide a useful insight to the Town for the future use of this parcel. Title to the above-mentioned proposed senior citizen community was taken by Seacroft, Ltd. on September 1, 1983. Prior to this, on July 19, 1983, the Town Board had granted a rezoning application fov the site which consists of approximately 46 acres. The land was rezoned to "M-Light Multiple Use Zone" . Previously, the Town Board, as a lead agency, under Section 8-0109 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) , stated that the project was "unlisted" and would not have a significant impact on the environment. Concurrently with the purchase of the senior citizen community site, the applicant also took title to a 7. 1 acre piece of property zoned "B-Light Business" . On April 9, 1984, the applicant was given a pre-submission conference with the Planning Board to discuss the senior citizen development. At that conference a plan was presented showing the layout of a proposed shopping plaza on the 7. 1 acre site. The Town felt that the development of the business parcel was -1- connected with the development of the senior citizen community. Subsequently, the Town Board declared itself lead agency and re- quired the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact State- ment. In order to conform to the desire of the Planning Board, an analysis of the possible construction of a Colonial Shopping Plaza for this parcel has been evaluated and is depicted in this report. -2- LOCATION The subject parcel is 310,347.5 square feet (7. 13 acres) in area and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of School House Road and Griffing Street in the Hamlet of Cutch- ogue. Refer to Location Map (Figure 1) . The parcel fronts approximately 643 feet of Griffing Street. It also lies adjacent to and south of the proposed senior citizen community, sharing a property line of approximate- ly 162 feet. The site, aside from the previously mentioned pro- perties, is completely surrounded by land owned by the Church of the Sacred Heart. The parcel lies approximately 292 feet north of Main Road (State Road 25) . -3- + G �- t EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Due to its proximity to the proposed "Hamlet at Cutchogue" development, many of the environmental characteristics of the site are similar to that of the proposed senior citizen communi- ty. In summary though: Soils. The site contains two predominant soil types, Haven Loam 0-2 percent slopes and Haven Loam Thick Surface Layer. Both types of soil are described as deep, well drained and medi- um textured. Internal drainage is very good and the hazard of erosion is slight. Topography. The site is relatively flat with most slopes generally ranging from 1 to ,5%. Please refer to Section 3 (Inventory of Existing Environmen- tal Conditions) of the Hamlet at Cutchogue Draft Environmental Impact Statement for information concerning community services, groundwater, wildlife, etc. -5- EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING The subject parcel of land is currently zoned Hamlet Business. As described in Chapter 100 of the current Code of the Town of Southold, the following uses are permitted in a Hamlet Business district: o Banks o Retail Stores o Restaurants o Bakeshops o Personal service stores and shops o Auditorium or meeting hall o Repair shops for households o Custom workshops o Bus or train stations o Theaters or cinemas o Libraries or museums o Laundromat Under bulk, area and parking the following requirements per- tain: o The lot area will not be less than 20, 000 SF and the lot width not less than sixty (60) feet. o At least 25$ of the lot area shall be landscaped with grass and plantings. o The required front yards shall be not less than fifteen (15) feet. o The required side yards shall be twenty-five (25) feet with one not less than ten (10) feet. -6- o The required rear yard shall not be less than twenty- five (25) feet. o Parking shall be provided in off-street parking areas which shall provide one (1) parking space, three hundred fifty (350) square feet in area, for each one hundred (100) square feet of sales floor area. o The total floor area for each retail or service estab- lishment located therein shall not exceed ten thousand (10, 000) square feet. The property is currently vacant and is being used under agreement by the Church of the Sacred Heart for church purposes and for use as a playground for the Sacred Heart Parochial School located to the south of the subject property. Also in- cluded within the subject property is a proposed extension of School House Road located to the north of the site (see Property Line Map, Figure 2) . The extension is 60 feet wide for approxi- mately 300 feet then widens to 80 feet for 100 feet as shown on the map. This extension covers approximately 26, 000 square feet (0.60 acre) . As described in the license agreement between Leisure Greens, Inc. and the Roman Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart dated the 26th of January, 1982 and adopted by the appli- cant in an assignment of license agreement between Leisure Greens Associates and Seacroft Plaza, Ltd. dated September 15, 1983, the described agreement between the Church of the Sacred Heart and the applicant shall continue until it is terminated by the applicant giving the Church 60 days written notice after the applicant has constructed a roadway over the property denoted as "proposed extension". The applicant, as dictated by the agree- ment, shall also construct a six foot high cyclone fence and install buffer landscaping along the common property lines of the subject site and the Church of the Sacred Heart. -7- Lu s 2 NO J Z �U700 Q Lf) _ N J O � S z 4 a W x . . GRIFFING STREET o " X N S 380 32'4 "E 642.92 S 42 09 0 E `p 00 0 •- 140. 292.20 ca Z N O O O V e N• IL I-- a c V N O '� o r � — r Df ae " z W a . AREA 7.1246 ACRES "' ° N 3700 400 00 O W x , o W NCM N Wc* J W ccv c ,I' w I S.C.T.M. cc CHURCH OF THE N 20.00' DISTIST 1000 ,SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3 o y; SACRED HEART 0. o titi a o A- O z _ o� .30+� ��'� a 80.00' N 360 54' 20"W 640.00610 ,�a 5 CHURCH OF THE PROJECT NEED, BENEFITS AND OBJECTIVES As explained in the Master Plan Update Summary for the Town of Southold prepared by Raymond, Parish, Pine and Weiner, Inc. April, 1985, "a statement of what the Town considers to be its long range goals and the desirable types and patterns of develop- ment appropriate to achieve those goals is essential". As part of the master plan update, each of the four major hamlets of the Town of Southold, including Cutchogue, were examined in depth concerning the existing and future conditions of development, vacant land, parking and traffic patterns, natural and environ- mental features, and historic areas. Also derived in the Master Plan Update were Hamlet Land Use Plans that were designed to; o Maintain the hamlet as a community focal point and an activity center. o Strengthen the existing retail and service commercial uses in the hamlet centers. o Provide adequate parking for commercial and public uses. o Provide for a range of housing for younger and older res- idents with a range of income levels within the hamlet areas, with higher densities near the center and lower density in outlying areas. o Recognize that transition areas exist between the hamlet business areas and outlying residential areas. o Provide for some auto-oriented, general commercial uses at the outer edge of the hamlet to complement hamlet cen- ter commercial uses. -9- o Where appropriate, provide areas of sufficient size to establish office parks or light industrial parks to of- fer opportunities for expanded economic development with- in the Town. o Provide areas for recreation activities as well as open space areas for passive recreation opportunities and for protection of environmental features. o Suggest road improvements where desirable for smoother traffic flow within the hamlet and/or the Town. o Preserve agricultural use of land where prime soils ex- ist and a sufficient number of contiguous parcels have remained in farming activities to maintain the viability of agriculture in ,relative proximity to the hamlet cen- ter. o Protect the quality of ground and surface waters and nat- ural environmental features. As shown on the Hamlet of Cutchogue Land Use Plan, Figure 3, the subject property's current zoning is Hamlet Business. As explained in the Draft Generic Environmental Impact State- ment on Proposed Local Law of 1987 Amending the Town of Southold Zoning Ordinance (accepted by the Town Board, March 8, 1988) : The purpose of the Hamlet Business (HB) District is to provide for business development in the hamlet central business areas, including retail, office, and services uses, public and semi-public uses, as well as hotel and motel and Multi-family residential development that will -10- FIGURE S" s. •.•. •. •�• •1•I•. -:�• •.• • • • " so Im 0 Ft i / Eo is tz so so ••:•:•••••••• •:�� • �• • '••�►•rte •:•• : •• �� • ••• • • • • • 1•••• •••'i: • • • •••••�• • • :: i• = Y • • • • • • • ••••• • • • r • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • •• • �• • • • •`. ••• / • • �� • • .'.'• . • o .• 1. .� • •. EQ E • T••• ,� .•�� ti. . . , •• �• i• :•:1� • i� �� .i• •• : • w:• •i•• •• i o F m • • •�•• i•�:•• •• • •• :• • • • • • • r •► •• • • • •• • �� • • • • ••.}•• • • • •� .f• • • •• • • o • • • •• • • •• • •'K• •{ • Zb • •• • • • • • •.�• •• •� , •e ,J •� •; LAI •�i:: • ♦• • •• •• : �•�• •w :• •••::•• • • • .• f•�:1.•• • ••'• a' :•• :••. • f .' • • • • •'• • • i •• •�� r •:• � • :::: • • • '•� •� •i• •1. • • •• • • : 1. l0 •::: •• • •• �• : • ' •� • •••• • •' •• r • see. • • • • • •••4 6 •••/7* • • •• •• •• •• • C • • • • •�• • • •' : i� • • • ••� •r • • ••• i00.11 1 : : •• • �1• ••••• ••• Q •:• i i i•�• :: • ••• •••/• •• �• 1 1 •• 1 so so. so ee Is ••• •• +'•`��I : Of • • • I . . . S.C.T.M. uzzi L • • DISTIST 1000 SECTION 102 BLOCK 01 LOT 33.3 support and enhance the retail development and provide a focus for the hamlet area. The Hamlet Business (HB) District is a modified version of the present B-Light Business zone. It allows busi- ness, office, specialty and residential uses at higher densities provided utilities are available in the hamlet centers. The construction of this parcel as a commercial retail area is not only consistent with long standing development plans of the Town but, as explained in the Master Plan of the Town, it is also essential in the proper growth of Cutchogue for years to come. -12- DESIGN AND LAYOUT As explained earlier in this analysis, the applicant has no immediate plans in developing this parcel. But in light of the Town's request, the proposed development scenario to be described does mirror the most appealing and realistic plan for this parcel of property. Under current zoning regulations, the 7. 1 acre site could yield a retail store floor area of approximately 30, 000 to 33, 000 square feet. The decided upon scenario would be to develop a 22, 000 SF Colonial Shopping Plaza where customers may walk from store to store (i.e. bank, bakery, arts and crafts and hardware stores) . (See Figure 4. ) the number of retail spaces will range in size as reasonably dictated by the tenants and will be clustered to the north of the subject site. The architecture of the build- ings will be consistent to that of the proposed Hamlet at Cut- chogue senior citizen community adjacent to the north. The conceptual layout will include sitting areas, landscaped areas, and other amenities to create a Colonial Village-like feeling. Realizing the dire need of parking within the Hamlet area, any proposal would contain provisions to construct at least 325 parking stalls on the southern portion of the site. Included within these 325 parking stalls are the required 220 stalls needed by the development of the Colonial Shopping Plaza (1 stall per 100 SF of retail) and also 105 stalls that may be used -13- I -NO SHEETS V! 0 2 � 00M 2 O Iii. I U i U) GRIFFING STREET ip -- O PROPOSED HAMLET O AT CUTCHOGUE / DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED PARKING FOR PROPOSED Z COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA i AND FOR TOWN SHOPPING O 1 W L xxro5iurlavr t� �d �� Zor.inp: ! Light laciness District CHURCH OF THE SACRED HEART / o >��=5m 2 , D a Total Site Area >,f7,560 6F 71717,900500 SF Total Floor Area for er,cb Retail as tabliabsent 130,000 SF I,500 SF ierceat Lot coverage 7S5 Ma:ianu [teat Yard Setback ]S it :tar Yard Setback 35 it SS 7, Yard Setback 75 it Tc:al Parking Spaces lased on 1 spaceSi 04 Total Floor Area 770 375 I CHURCH OF THE Sp'G FIGURE 4 CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT A 7-ACRE PARCEL a cows,-716d tN6w1{a1 Wuok all*rose as parking for other shopping activities within the Hamlet of Cutchogue. A conceptual breakdown of the proposed site is as follows: Acres 0 26, 000 SF Roadway Extension 0. 6 0 22, 000 SF Colonial Shopping Plaza on 2 . 0 acres 2 .0 0 82,800 SF of landscaping (25% required) 1.9 0 325 parking stalls x 350 SF per stall = 113,740 SF 2 . 6 7.1 This conceptual development will be benefited by and will benefit the proposed adjacent Hamlet at Cutchogue community. It will be a relatively shprt walk (maximum distance: 1/4 mile) for residents of the Hamlet at Cutchogue and also a meeting place for seniors to get a bite to eat, pick up a newspaper, or talk to friends. The layout is also beneficial to the local com- munity as it will give the area a focus and a Village-like feel- ing and also reduce the severe parking problems currently affect- ing Cutchogue. But above all, the Colonial Shopping Plaza is within all zoning requirements, is consistent with all land use plans for the Town, and is a seemingly needed resource for the community. -15- CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS The construction of the proposed shopping center will take approximately six months to one year to complete. Local roads, namely Main Road and Depot Lane, will probably be utilized for construction traffic. Although these local roads will be utilized during the construction of the shopping center, no traffic detours are necessary. During the construction of the shopping center, a security chain link fence accompanied with a lock will be provided to secure the site from any vandals or young children. This security measure will be helpful in keeping the children of the elementary school of the Church out of the construction area. This security measure will also aide in allowing material such as wood and steel to be stored on site. Also, during construction, fugitive dust will be controlled when appropriate through application of water and/or calcium chloride, and the stabilization of exposed earth surfaces by pavement and landscaping. It is expected that construction noise will remain within acceptable community noise standards, for example, a maximum L10 noise level of 70 dB(A) . This will assure that the impact to the adjacent private elementary school and school yard will be insignificant. Due to the continual growth of the surrounding community, including the proposed senior citizen development, construction of the shopping center will benefit all parties throughout the area. The much needed shopping center will serve both the -16- senior citizen community and the surrounding nearby residences. Additional parking will be made available by the developer to the Town of Southold to help in the relief of on-street parking by area shoppers and residents which will create a safer and more efficient flow of traffic on Main Road. -17- TRAFFIC IMPACTS As stated previously, the Town of Southold requested that this study consider the development of a Colonial Shopping Plaza on an adjacent parcel. Current zoning would permit a center of 33,000 SF to be built on the site; however, the proposed center is smaller in size at 22,000 SF. The estimated trips for this Colonial Shopping Plaza (Land Use Code 820) are as follows: PM PERIOD Retail: Fitted Curve: Ln (T) = 0.52 Ln (X) + 4.04 X = 22 . 0 KSF T = 284 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 49% enter, 51% exit Trips: Entering = 139 Exiting = 145 SATURDAY PERIOD Retail: Fitted Curve: Ln (T) - 0.62 Ln (X) + 3 .97 X = 22 .0 KSF T = 360 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 51% enter, 49% exit Trips: Entering = 184 Exiting = 176 The following table compares the estimated trips generated by each of the two scenarios for both of the peak periods. -18- WEEKDAY PM SATURDAY SCENARIO LAND USE ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT I - Proposed Project Resid. - 160 units 62 31 48 41 II - Proposed Project Resid. - 160 units 62 31 48 41 with Colonial Retail - 22,000 SF 139 145 184 176 Shopping Plaza TOTAL: 201 176 232 217 As requested by the Town of Southold, the 1990 Build with Colonial Shopping Plaza condition was then compared to the 1990 No Build condition. Again, the levels of service will remain the same as those of the 1990 No Build condition for the inter- sections of SR 25 at New Suffolk and SR 25 at Griffing Street. At the intersection of CR 48 and Depot Lane, however, the PM peak period level of service drops from a C to a D, and for Saturday, from a D to an E. These results indicate that the impact of the proposed development with the Colonial Shopping Plaza would be minor at the intersections of Route 25 at New Suffolk and Griffing Street, as no changes in level of service would occur. Some impact will be experienced at the Route 48 intersection with Depot Lane as a one level drop in service will occur. As stated in a previous section, the proposed Hamlet at Cutchogue community will house senior citizens aged 55 and greater. If the proposed development was to be a conventional Residential Planned Unit Development with no age restriction, the amount of vehicles within the area would be approximately -19- three times greater than that of a senior citizen development. By proposing a senior citizen development within the subject parcel, the number of non-driving residents becomes substantial- ly greater, thereby reducing the safety hazard for children at- tending the elementary school at the Church of the Sacred Heart. The location and nature of the community allows resi- dents to walk to the bank, post office and nearby stores, there- by reducing the amount of traffic normally generated by these facilities. -20- APPENDIX A DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 360,000 350,000 ; SUFFOLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN 340,000 330,000 POPULATION PROJECTIONS • • •320,000 ; 310,000 _ 300,000 290,000 _ • 280,000 ; 270,000 260,000 ; 250,000 ; 240,Q00 230,000 220,000 210,000 200,000 190,000 180,000 T 170,000 160,000 150,000 140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 O O O O O 50,000 O 00 O O 40,000 0 A © © A O 00 O O O O O O O O 30,000 O O O 0 p O O © 4 20,000 © 00 O O O O O 10,000 p p O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 • 2010 Age 75+ 1000 Age 60+ ; ;( I -prepared by Sherry Brandsema, Program Manager -Age 55+ p•••••- based on 1980 Census data projections * SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING A variety of Senior Citizen housing is available in Suffolk County There is a planned retirement community (PRC) of conventionally construc- ted single detached homes, a PRC of modular homes, attached condominium units and attached units in homeowner associations, trailer parks and apartment complexes. Subsidized senior citizen housing complexes are also available throughout the county, some of which are publically sponsored and others which are private. In all instances there are long waiting lists for the subsidized Senior Citizen housing. The following list includes the names of all Senior Citizen Complexes located in Suffolk County. Additional information can be found for each complex in the housing lists by type of complex (apartments, condominiums A• etc. ) in this housing chapter. Trailer parks have not been included on this list because none of the trailer parks in Suffolk are exclusively for Senior Citizens. Complex Name Community Type No. of Units BABYLON TOWN TOTAL S Snug Harbor Amityville Condominium 176 Babylon Park Center �, Deer Park Apartment 72 Ampress Plaza North Amityville Subsidized 10 Holiday Square West Babylon Subsidized 120 BROOKHAVEN TOWN TOTAL 4,792 Strathmore Gate East Coran Homeowner's Assoc. 175 Strathmore Terrace Mt. Sinai Homeowner's Assoc. 231 Strathmore Gate Stony Brook Homeowner's Assoc. 162 Leisure Village Ridge Condominium 1,540 Leisure Knoll Ridge Single Homes (PRC) 670 The Knolls at Stony Brook Stony Brook Condominium ISO Greenwood Village Manorville Modular Homes (PRC) 550 Ridgehaven Village Ridge Subsidized (U.C.) 220 Northwood Village Patchogue Subsidized 64 Terry Apartments Patchogue Subsidized 65 Brookwood-on-the-Lake Lake Ronkonkoma Subsidized 336199 St. Joseph's Village Selden Subsidized Homestead Village Corm Subsidized 100 Avery Village E. Patchogue Subsidized 300 300 HUNTINGTON TOWN TOTAL Subsidized 300 Paumanock Village Greenlawa 94 i ' SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING (Cont'd) Community Type No. of Units Complex Name 758 ISLIP TOWN TOTAL 100 Ockers Gardena Oakdale Subsidized Penataquit Village Bay Shore Subsidized 134100 Robinson Village Central Islip Subsidized 100 Village at Brentwood Brentwood Subsidized 46 Hamilton Village Central Islip Subsidized 190 Baytown Village Bay Shore Subsidized •Belfran #4 East Islip Apartment (U.C.) 88 114 RIVERHEAD TOWN TOTAL 114 John Wesley Village Riverhead Subsidized 1,110 SMITRTOWN TOWN TOTAL Subsidized 298 Village of St. John Smithtown 114 Under Construction Rings Park Subsidized 758 Fairfield Village East St. James Condominium COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES its Riverhead Town Comm. Dev. Ag. - pas Tech Management Corp. Contact: Paul Fink Contact: Mr. Rick Hanley 175 W. Main St. 200 Howell ave. Babylon, N.Y. 11704 Riverhead, N.Y. 661-6200 727-3200 Suffolk Community Development Corp. Southampton Town Comm. Dev. Ag. 625 Middle Country Rd. Hampton Rd. Coram, N.Y. Southampton, N.Y. 698-8201 - 283-6000 Village of Patchogue Community Dev. Suffolk Rousing Services Contact: Mr. Frederick P. Severance Hauppauge Center, Roos 220 14 Baker 550 Smithtown Bypass Patchogue, N.Y. Smithtown, N.Y. 475-8851 724-6920 Brookhaven Commaity Dev. Agency Smithtown Community Dev. Office Contact: Edward P. Romaine Contact Frank DeRubuis 1717 North Ocean Ave. Smithtown Town Hall Medford, N.Y. 11763 99 W. Main St. 654-2100 Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Huntington Housing Authority Huntington Comm. Dev. Contact: Angela Smith 213 Main St. , 5 Lowndes Ave. Huntington, N.Y. 11743 Huntington, N.Y. 11746 427-6220 Islip Community Dev. Corp. Exec. Dir. Howard Quinn Islip Housing Authority 15 Shore Lane 964 Montauk Hwy. Bayshore, N.Y. 11706 Oakdale, N.Y. 589-7100 95 OO M14ITY PROFILES COMM I TY PROF I LE S Legislative Districts N.Y.S. N.Y.S. U.S. Suffolk Lend Population Community _Torn Assembly Snnete Congress legis)afion Area Total t Change Shlnnecock Hills Southampton 2 1 1 16 School District (Sq. N1.1 1980 70 to 80 Shirley Brookhaven 2 1,3 1 2,16 Hampton Bays 5, Tuckahoe 13 5.40• 2,344 23.8 1 I 10.93 IB,0.72 170.6 Shoreham V. Brookhaven 1 I 2 1.3 6 7 S. Haven 30, we. Floyd 32, Middle Is. 12, S. Manor 21 45 555 5.9 Smithtown Smithtown 6 Shoreham-Wading River I Sound Beach Brookhaven 1,4 I 1 1,4 Smithtown I, Kings Park S, Hauppauge 6 13.01 30,906 3.9 2.66 8,071 65.5 Hiller Place B. Rocky Pt. 9 Southampton V. Southampton 2 1 1 16 So10 i *3 14.17 Soatnempton 6 5.60 4,000 -18.4 uth Huntington Huntington + Southold *Southold 1 1 /e S. Huntington 13, Half Hollow Hills 5 3.94 14,934 2.5 Springs East Hampton 2 1 1 16 *Southold S, Greenport 10 *12.20 *3.197 *21.2 St. James Smithtown 6 2 1 7 Springs 4 8.65 3,197 51.8 Smithtown 1 4.52 12,122 3.4 Stony Brook Brookhaven 4 2 1 5 Tuckahoe Southampton 2 1 1 16 middle Country 11, Three Village 1 4.3 7.34 16,155 - 1.6 Village of the Branch Smithtown 6 2 1 6 Tuckahoe 13, Southampton 6 4.70• 953 Wading River R verhead 1 1 I I Smithtown 1 .80 1,701 1.9 Wei nscott East Hampton 2 1 1 16 Shorllea-wading River I, Riverhead 2 8.00• 4,405 59.1 Walnscott 2� 6.90 421 35.4 Watermltl 8 Sagaponack Southampton 2 1 1 16 West Babylon Babylon 8,11 4,5 2 12.13 Southampton 6, Brldgehampton 9 N/A 962 32.6 West Bay Share Islip 7,8 3,4 2 I1 W. Babylon 2, N. Bab Ion 3, Babylon 1, Lindenhurst 4, Wyandanch 9 7.64 41,099 5.9 1 1 16 Bay Shore 1 2.36 5,119 3.6 Westhampton Southampton 2 Westhampton Beach V. Southampton 2 1 1 16 Westhampton am (c)1 20.96 2,774 41.1 Westhampptoto n Boxh 2 3.10 1,6:9 -IS.4 Westhampton Beach U. Southampton 2 1 1 16 West Hills Huntington 10 5 3 14,17 Westhampton Beach 2 N/A 39 N/A(d) West Islip Islip 7,8 3,4 2 11 0 Huntington 3, S. Huntington 13, Half Hollow Mills S 4.79 6,071 - 0.7 West Sayville Islip 5 3 2 8,9 West Islip 9 6.18 29,533 - 6.0 Y wyandench Babylon 10,11 4,5 2 13 Connetquot 7, Sayville 3.17 8,185 10.8 wy andench 9, Half Hollow Hills S 5.64 13.215 2.6 Yaphank Brookhaven 2,3 1,3 1 2 Middle Is. 12, S. Country 1, South Hawn 30 12.30• 2,812 43.8 lc)Westhempton Is In the following School Districts: Ramsenburg-Speonk t, Eastport 11, Hampton Bays S. Westhampton Beach 2. 0uogue 3, East puogue 17. (d)Part of Remsenburg-Speonk In 1970. 54 5i TOWN AND ODUNTY PROFIV S- TOWN AND COUNTY PRDF I LE S BABYLON BROOKHAVEN EAST HAMPTON HUNTINGTON ISLIP RIVERHEAD SHELTER ISLAND- SMITHTO-WN SOUTHAMPTON SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY TOWN ----- ------ ----- - -- - -- - ----- -- TRANSPORTATION25 3,135 704 163 38,070 Persons Using Pubttc3 T,098 Trans.Trans• 8,815 6,361 239 10.059 8.429 140 550 44,339 14,348 6,258 460,625 Persons Using Auto, Truck or Ven 75,159 132,641 4,674 74,576 107,870 7,210 1,199 426 75,097 Total Working outside N/S 16,128 17,673 584 17,275 18,483 163 HOUSING 1,818 32,781 28,466 11,130 431,722 Total Units 63,148 120,833 12,971 61,585 89,832 9,158 5,760 60,142 84,881 7,492 887 31,986 16,717 7,461 589.3 Total Occupied Units - Number 61,094 109,266 48.8 97.6 58.8 67.0 Percent 96.8 90.4 44.4 97.7 94.5 81.8 147 4,083 4,023 1,478 77,713 Total Renter Occupied - Number 13,971 21,363 1,226 8,875 17,774 1,773 7 16.6 12.8 24.0 19.6 20.2 14.8 20.9 23. Percent 22.9 22.3 21.3 72,300 57,200 60,200 59,300 45,600 Median Value Owner Occupied (S) 42,900 39,500 70,000 66,700 40,000 44,400 296 364 308 310 352 Median Rent (f) 364 353 331 352 355 295 Units In Structure 1,473 29,297 16,280 7,710 323.503 One Unit 48,995 98,129 6,783 53,941 71,927 5,267 31 937 911 357 23,733 Two Units 7,342 4,826 194 3,911 4,927 �7 24 2,376 1,734 386 39,175 Three or more Units 6,044 12,567 658 3,556 11,087 743 10 20 698 28 3,251 Mobile Homes 2.3 3.5 2.5 2.5 416 78 205 39 531 1,226 3.3 Persons per unit 3.3 3.3 2.4 3.3 3.4 2.6 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN MAJOR SINGLE ANCESTRY GROUPS 82 Itallan-44,321 Italian-57,598 English-1,637 Itallan-28,873 ItalIer-47,3 Polish-2.790 English-278 Italian-20,870 Irish-3,453 Polish-1,897 Italian-201,5 Irish-15,331 Irish-26.447 German-1,116 German-14,867 Irlsh-27,02 German-1,325 German-156 Irish-9,840 English-3,157 English-1,718 Irish-99,857 German-12,201 German-23,190 lrish-797 Irish-14,505 Germarr19,2 English-i,242 Irish-146 Garman-7,413 German-3,116 Germ 1,456 German-34,225 7,572 893 32,194 16,615 7,444 385,753 HOUSEHOLDS (H/H) 571 25,731 9,962 4,833 279,993 Total Households 61,205 109,217 5,864 60,119 84,630 4,622 175 16,512 4.116 1,817 165,332 Marled Couple Family 43,446 19,495 3,383 46,256 61,688 1,945 2S 1,731 1,011 341 24,561 Marled w. children 23,625 50,213 1,282 27,017 33,630 316 33 1,361 B36 379 19,071 Single Parent H/H w• children 4,397 7,657 261 2,690 6.332 463 Single Person H/H 3,929 4,434 250 2,847 4,542 ! I A r i r !/ BABYLON - Pinelawn Railroad Station SMITHTOWN - Scenic Northern State Parkway 29 28 �r i■r r COMMUNITY PROFILES COMMUNITY PROFILES Legislative Districts Lana P ulatlon N.Y.S. N.Y.S. U.S. Sul folk Area Total {Change Caron wi Torn Assembly Senate Frmingvllle Brookhaven Congress Le Isl at ion (Sq. Mi.) 1980 70 to 80 Fire Island Brookhaven t Islip 3,3 1 5,4 School *Fishers Is. *Southold I 3.11 Sachem S, Middle Country II 4.48 13,398 46.7 *N/A 319 1}t8 779.2 Fort Salon 1 *I *I * 1 Flare Island t/ 5.32 7� *- 9a Huntington a S•Ithlorn 6,9 2 3 7,18 *Flsners Island 1 B.S7 9,330 19.9 Gllgb-Oak Beach Babylon 8 1 T 11 Nortkporf /, Kings Park 7 Baby- l 2.71 381 141.1 Gordon Heights Brookhaven 1 Great RIvor Islip 8 3 I2 Middle Island 12 1.40' 1,590 21.7 Graenlown Huntington 9110 2,5 2 9,t0 East Islip 3 6.90 1,631 - 5.2 Grosport V. Southold 3 17,18 CraepaY West Southold 1 ar 1 1 I Hporflelds 6, Northport 1, El.od 1, S. Huntington I} 7.82 17,869 2.5 I 1 1 I Gr.eport 10 .90 2,773 - 8.4 Hampton Bays SouthamptonGre.port 10, Oyster Ponds 2 2.60 1,571 - 6.6 Southampton Park Southaton 2 1 1 16 10.62 7,256 47.4 2 I l 16 Hampton Bays S, Riverhead 2 Hauppauge Smithtown l Islip 6,7 2,3 1,2,3 6,8,9,10 Southampton 6 7.70 1,331 15.1 "Bad of the Harbor Y. Smithtown 6 2 1 Hauppauge 6, Smithtown 1, Brentwood 12 10.23 20,960 11.6 Hol brook Brookhaven 6 Islip 3.5 73.00 2.3 112 3.6,8 Smithtown 1, Thee Village 1 6.68 21,372 98.9 Sachem 5 Hill tsrllle Brookhaven i Islip 3 2,3 1,2 Huntington Huntington 9,10 5 3,8 Sachem 5, Patchogue-led ford 24 -- 13,515 69.0 Huntingfon Bay Y. Huntington 3 17,18 ng 9 5 3 18 Cola Spring Harbor 2, Huntington 3, Nsrborflal ds 6 8.38 21,727 - 9.9 Huntington 7 1.06 1,783 - 0.3 Huntington Station Huntington 10 5 3 7,8 },1 2 �� Huntington 3, S. Huntington I3, Nsrbortlel ds 6 5.11 28,769 - 0.2 Islip Islip Islip 2, Central Islip 13 3.94 13,438 27.1 Islip Terrace Islip B 3 Jamlimport Rlvarhead 1 1 9 East Islip 3, 1.31 5,588 13.0 Kings Park Smithtown 6 I kettltuck-Cutchague 9. Laurel 11 1.70• 1,069 14.6 Lake u-rork r. Smithtown 2 3 7 7 2 Kings Park 5, Smithtown 1 6.01 16,171 18.1 Lake Ronkonkoma Brookhavae, Islip i Smithtown 3,6,7 1 7,6 Sachem 5, Middle Country 11, Them . Mid. 1 3.01 9,692 19.2 2,3 1,2 6,8,9 Laurel C. Itllp 13, Sachem S, Connetquof 1, Mld. Cory 11, Smith. I, Ham p. 6 13.10 38,378 47.5 Southold I i Lindenhurst Y. Babylon 11 I I Laurel 11, Kett stuck-Cutchogue 9 2.60• 962 60.9 Lloyd Harbor Y. 4 2 13 LlndeMurst 4 3.78 26,919 - 5.1 Iluntington 10 MaulorvIIis Brookhaven 2 S 3 17 Cold Spring Harbor 2 9.19 7,108 1.0 i i 2, 16 (See Below (4)1 27.70• 6,548 308.7 mastic Brookhaven 2 2 lea. Floyd 32, Center Moriches 33 5.10 10,413 152.9 Mastic Beach Brookhaven 2 1 Mattituck Southold I 1 1 2 Wm- Floyd 32 4.29 8,318 70.8 Ned ford 1 I Mattltuck-Cutchogue 9, Laurel 11 5.76 3,923 29.1 Brookhaven I,2,3 1,2,3 Melville Brookhaven 10 1 2.3,4 Sachem 5, Patch-4Wford 24, S. Country 4, Middle Is. 12 10.73 20,418 99.5 Middle Island 3 T,J 11,17 Halt Mol for Mills S 10.19 8,139 20.5 Brookhaven 1 I 1 1,2 Madill• Island 12 8.22 5,703 117.7 M11 ler Place Brookhaven 1 Montauk I I I,1 Mi ler P1. B, Mt. Sinai 7, Middle Is. 12, Rocky Pt. 9 6.52 7,877 78.5 East Hayton 2 I Mount Sinal Brookhaven 1 1 1 16 Montauk 6 15.67 2,828 63.7 14apa4gua-HICher Mllis East Hampton 2 1 4 Mt, Sinal 7, Pt. Jeff. 6, Com"vogue 3, MiIJar P1. 8 6.14 6,591 205.6 Ifaaconpf Smithtown 6 Z i 16 Amagansett 7, Montauk 6, 6.54 151 109.7 6 Smithtown I 3.78 10,706 47.1 <alMrarvil le It In fMfollowing School Districts. Middle Island 12, South Manor 21, Mast Manor 31, a11llam Floyd 32, Center Moriches 33, East Moriches 31, Eastport 11 end Riverhead 2. 38 39 000"ITY PROFILES Education (25yrs L over) 1980 Income (Dollars) Persons Below Medlan Percent Percent 001141MITY PROFILES Median Median _ Per Poverty bevel School H.S. College CorawnIty Family Household Capita No. Percent Years Grads. Grads. Employmamt lags 16 6 over) o t Shinnecoek Hills 21,098 16,532 6.499 146 6.1 12.8 77.1 28.1 White Collor Unemployed Under S S to 17 18 to 21 65 end over Nadi en Shirley 16,317 17,988 5,070 2.257 12.3 12.3 64.3 6.3 No. Percent No. Percent No. Percent No Percent No. Percent No. Percent Age_ Shoreham V. 33,881 32,278 10,818 4 .7 16.1 91.6 61.1 521 64.0 39 4.6 72 3.0 240 10.1 652 27.6 476 20.1 31.7 Smithtown 30.613 28,829 8,433 1,007 3.3 12.1 81.2 24.0 2,646 44.1 577 6.8 2,101 11.6 5.130 26.4 852 4.7 1,132 6.3 25.7 Sound Beach 21,893 20,043 6.914 445 5.6 12.6 75.4 18.6 201 90.7 19 7.9 23 4.1 181 31.9 23 4.1 11 7.8 31.7 9,152 67.5 736 5.2 1,491 4.8 6,501 27.5 2,405 7.8 2,473 8.0 30.7 Southampton V. 20,716 18,547 12,351 217 5.6 12.6 73.9 23.0 1,866 56.2 194 3.7 706 8.8 1,933 24.0 434 5.4 953 11.8 29.0 South Huntington 28,807 26,873 9,219 473 3.2 12.7 81.2 25.9 '*Southold *19,320 '*17,904 *8,601'*328 *6.9 *12.7 *74.3 '*22.9 997 51.3 119 7.8 160 1.0 671 16.1 216 7.4 890 22.3 12.7 Springs 17,073 13,432 7,835 329 10.3 12.5 67.3 18.6 4,990 67.1 222 2.9 774 7.2 3,332 22.4 1,017 1.3 1,210 8.2 32.8 St. James 25,164 23,773 7,691 471 4.1 12.6 75.0 16.0 '*1,079 '*59.1 *143 `*7.3 *221*4.6 *784*16.4 •*180 *3.8*1,280*26.8 *47.5 710 56.0 126 9.0 205 6.4 533 17.3 135 4.2 520 16.3 35.7 Stony Brook 31,880 30,041 9,917 686 4.7 15.2 69.2 45.1 3.039 60.3 243 4.6 633 7.2 2,699 23.9 731 6.0 1,674 13.8 73.7 Tuckahoe 21,779 16,452 10,370 86 6.5 12.3 59.7 15.0 Village of the Branch 33,802 32,184 11,045 32 3.1 13.4 88.7 32.0 7,951 60.1 310 4.0 877 3.4 1,140 27.6 966 6.0 1,299 8.0 32.2 Wading River 23.076 20,897 -7.2% 177 4.2 12.7 75.4 23.7 234 43.4 7 1.3 27 2.7 188 18.5 112 11.0 121 12.2 31.7 Walnscott 16,739 15.5% 9,677 B1 22.0 13.0 79.3 18.5 596 77.4 46 5.5 91 5.3 475 26.7 127 7.4 112 6.6 32.0 1,042 65.1 122 7.1 322 7.4 1,116 25.7 229 7.3 509 11.7 31.8 Watermlll-Sagaponack 24,500 23.000 11,962 122 12.7 14.6 85.1 38.1 63 43.2 19 11.5 28 7.6 26 7.1 0 0.0 121 32.9 53.5 West Babylon 22,868 21,723 6,817 2.857 6.9 12.3 66.1 7.5 West Bay Shore 29,899 27,436 9,9 279 4.7 12.7 79.5 23.3 266 59.1 20 •.3 78 4.0 135 14.1 16 7.8 124 19.1 46.7 99 Westhampton 16,845 16,075 7,363 284 10.2 12.6 77.8 17.7 .9,121 49.3 1,204 6.1 2,565 6.2 10,235 21.5 3,064 7.4 7,221 7.T 29.3 Westhampton Beech V. 23,973 19,979 12,261 146 6.8 13.0 80.3 30.2 3,771 64.5 167 6.1 243 .8 1,231 2 .1 732 6.5 393 .7 32.9 677 74.7 98 7.5 206 7.4 609 222.0 122 4.1 312 111.3 31.0 Westhampton Beach U. 24.167 72,174 27,629 0 0.0 16.1 100.0 59.0 504 69.0 43 5.6 55 3.3 342 20.3 92 7.5 3Z7 19.4 40.4 West Hills 34.016 32.368 11,781 68 1.1 13.3 83.7 30.8 27 81.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 25.6 60.1 West Islip 26.722 25,736 7,672 1,315 4.5 12.5 73.5 14.2 West Sayville 69 337 ille 21,630 20,6}} ,997 1.1 12.7 71.8 17.7 2,012 71.3 157 S.4 315 7.2 1,121 23.1 K6 7.9 112 7.3 33.6 Wyandaayv . 21,670 21,133 6, 91 1,353 14.0 12.4 66.4 13.5 7.069 76.0 832 6.2 1,693 1.7 7,606 25.8 2,168 1.! 2,289 1.8 70.8 1,753 52.5 234 6.6 176 7.0 1,945 23.8 616 7.5 694 8.7 29.2 Yaphank 19,059 18,467 6,500 116 6.1 12.4 66.0 14.0 2.760 45.6 312 5.7 1.157 8.7 4,113 31.1 981 7.4 506 4.5 23.9 523 32.0 108 9.7 228 8.1 324 18.5 173 6.1 422 14.9 30.5 56 5 7 COMMUNITY PROFILES � Transportation to Work COMMUNITY PROFILES Race Public Auto, Persons White Black _ Persons of Trans- Truck, working out- Housing Units __ Units In Structure Persons roesnnlf No. Percent No. Percent Spanish Origin portatlon or Ven side H/S Total Octopi ed Unl is Renter Occupied Median Value Median Three Mobile per Shlnnecock Hills 2,229 91.2 SI 2.2 S4 16 620 122 Percent No. Percent Owner Occ.(flRentif> One Two Or More (bees Unit Units �• 670 46 281 0 2.3 ihlrley 17,478 96.7 273 1.7 1,117 398 5,267 691 1986 716 39.1 190 24.5 69,779 227 0 3.6 Shoreham V. 563 99.7 0 0.0 7 0 207 8 I 5,632 5,044 89.6 625 16.4 33,224 281 4,950 323 92 Smlthtovn 30,524 96.8 Ile .4 647 756 12.151 1,702 189 173 91.5 31 17.9 61,905 342 170 3 0 0 3.3 Sound Beach 7,967 98.7 12 .2 277 95 2,884 222 6.739 6,606 98.5 1,169 13.8 59,684 306 7,769 240 704 10 3.5 3,317 2,616 79.9 583 22.0 39.196 275 2,122 161 60 0 3.0 Southampton V. 3,236 80.9 743 18.6 30 118 1,411 165 South Huntington 14,617 96.4 46 .3 278 625 6,232 1,318 2,542 1,618 63.7 468 26.9 69,586 252 2,101 44 Be S 2.4 Southold *1,685*98.2 *79 '*1.7 *20 *29 '*1,534 *41 4 607�4,535 98.1 520 11.5 61,250 313 4 048 476 77 0 3.2 Springs 3,094 96.8 63 2.0 63 84 1,094 2% *2,8717 .957*68.2 *335*17.1 `*63,165 *212 *1,101 *14 *66 *5'*2.4 St. Jamas 11,991 98.9 69 .6 89 223 4,546 633 2,524 1,264 50.1 212 16.6 62,203 270 t,704 23 39 7 2.5 5,626 3.630 94.9 451 12.4 46,188 310 3,384 130 303 0 3.2 Stony brook 17,333 94.9 261 1.6 100 713 6,121 615 Tuckshoe 729 71.8 267 26.3 s 32 436 22 5,204 4,935 95.2 $18 11.1 59,1" 381 4,877 131 67 0 3.3 Village of the Branch 1.691 99.1 0 0.0 29 49 664 Its 584 365 70.3 79 20.7 76,452 230 372 16 19 0 2.6 wading River 4,202 96.0 104 2.4 92 49 1.436 87 466 476 97.5 Is 3.0 64,939 333 482 5 1 0 3.6 Walnscott 344 93.7 0 0.0 0 0 82 0 2,0117 1.484 71.1 273 16./ 72,706 263 1,296 70 32 176 2.8 r 395 161 45.6 62 34.3 60,786 264 192 6 0 0 2.0 watermlll-Sagaponack 907 93.9 59 6.1 0 47 332 100 Vast Babylon 36,861 88.5 4,436 10.6 1.385 1,540 15,815 3,163 I 869 300 43.7 54 14.2 122,637 230 546 26 0 0 2.5 West say Shore 7,084 99.4 15 .3 143 226 2,040 117 l 12,749 12,396 97.2 2,867 23.1 42,190 332 9,795 1,624 1,327 5 3.3 Westhampton 2,570 92.7 172 6.2 23 31 1,016 67 1,561 1,361 96.7 102 6.9 44,665 317 1,410 59 112 0 3.3 Westhampton Beach V. 1.551 92.2 126 7.5 28 36 569 70 f 1,438 1.028 71.7 334 32.9 61,146 268 1,076 111 41 52 2.7 2,044 696 34.1 186 26.7 71,163 280 620 39 120 0 2.4 Westhampton Beach U. 39 100.0 0 0.0 0 3 22 Is West Hills 5,974 96.4 24 .4 115 731 2,217 699 517 19 3.7 0 0.0 137,500 N/A 71 0 0 0 2.1 Mast Isllp 29,370 99.5 17 .I 819 1,293 10,696 2,423 1,901 1,672 96.5 125 6.7 75,007 367 1,799 70 32 0 3.2 West Sayville 8,137 99.4 19 .2 170 147 2,912 305 6,477 6,299 97.9 724 8.7 41,399 304 7,739 519 204 8 3.5 Wyandanch 4,373 33.1 8,357 63.2 1,056 364 4,274 700 2.5% 2,543 96.0 777 22.7 36,049 313 2,094 121 376 0 3.2 3,672 3,360 92.1 925 27.4 39,959 311 3,176 346 150 0 3.9 YapM* 2,657 93.9 116 4.1 84 7 905 /6 1,164 900 77.3 212 23.6 37,941 276 1,068 60 25 0 2.8 t 58 59 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TAXES (Cont'd) DISTRICT `nJMBER SOUTHAMPTON TOWN RATE PER $100.00 ASSESSED VALUE 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1 Remsenburg-Speonk 12.00* 11 .97* 11.70* ,2 Westhampton Beach 11.70* 11.74* 11.29* 3 Quogue 6.15* 5.12* 4.88* 4 Riverhead Central 23.81* 27.98* 30.39* 5 Hampton Bays 16.78* 18.52* 18.76* 6 Southampton 10.40* 11.09* 10.97* 9 Bridgehampton 16.53* 17.13* 16.09* 10 Sagaponack 6.57* 4.85* 5.52* 11 Eastport 21.32 25.19 27.42 12 Sag Harbor (North Raven) 14.84* 15.91* 15.89* 13 Tuckahoe 13.14* 12.39* 11.30* 14 Sag Harbor (Noyac) 14.84* 15.91* 15.89* 17 East Quogue 17.82* 18.10* 18.03* 18 Riverhead Central 23.81* 27.98* 30.39* 19 Sag Harbor 14.84* 15.91* 15.89* 20 Wainscott 7.10 7.50 7.24 *SOUTHOLD TOWN * RATE PER $100.00 ASSESSED VALUE 1980-81 1981-821982-83 2 Orient - S. Marion 10.237* 10.943* 11.1381* 4 Fishers Island 9.721 9.486 10.3332 5 Southold 12.803* 13.698* 14.8529* 9 Mattituck - Cutchogue 14.073* 15.838* 16.7846* 10 Greenport 16.580* 18.227* 21.9847* 11 Laurel 13.882* 17.531* 12.2594* 15 New Suffolk 10.191* 10.130* 10.1440* r i *Includes local library tax t s Y i 128 i COma11fMITY PROFILES COMMH I T Y PROF ILE$ _- Total Households IH/HI Married Married Sing. Parent Single Person Ranked Ma or Sin le Ancestry Groups H/H - Second Third Couple Fmmlly With Children H/H r. cAlld. First �. of No. of Tom 139 0 246 No. of =p Persons 174 96 481 174 Persons Grout/ Persons 3,963 2,771 319 Community Group 220 0ermen 143 5,010 96 5 21 Irish 337 Italian 9D3 169 116 902 Shinnecock Hills Irish 922 German 4,151 129 Italian I,SOB German 49 0.600 6'941 SYS Shirley S8 English 56 1,036 1.103 170 Shoreham V. Italian 2,458 Gorman 2,073 2,639 Italian 6,063 Irish 703 553 Smlthtorn Gorman 717 Irish 601 323 91 Italian 1.407 1,551 195 544 Sound Beech 3,331 I,B37 322 Polish 310 1.522 411 76 503 l05 German 1 066 1.295 -101 370 Southampton V. English 1,161 IrIsA1• 728 74 Itellen 2,5% Polishrman 320 1,251 755 550 South Huntington •101 Polish �' *English 2,740 I,526 212 *Southold men 282 Irish 200 3.664 English 436 Gorman 013 732 Springs 1 963 Irish 1,09) German 3,905 2,266 200 St. James Italian 4.990 84 22 165 1,103 German 1,091 400 38 229 21 49 Irish 1,400 Italian German 48 400 >09 576 46 334 Stony Brook 96 Polish 7/ Irish ISI 1,420 977 Tuckshoa 179 Irish 195 Gorman 67 16 7 village of the Branch Italian 410 78D Irish 305 1% 116 wading River German Gorman 17 132 Garman 10 Irish 250 83 22 Nalnscott English 410 769 1,677 IB 12.346 9.120 5,63 193 IS1 Polish 8J Irish 1,211 657 � Natermill-Segaponock English 2,011 Gorman 2,458 1.593 350 87 275 Itellen 10,937 Irish a5 1,046 637 214 Neat Babylon 7n Irish 324 Garman 364 124 SS Nest BM Store Itellen 165 English 110 673 Italian 109 German 100 13 Westhampton Irish 130 German 10 0 0 116 27 207 Westhampton Beech V. English 1,512 794 53 9 Eng sl an 4'4 t.g39 360 0% 10 Irish 410 0.162 6.515 3,033 435 Westhampton Beach U. Gorman Gorman 555 Irish 1 762 1,061 199 Italian 1.006 2 961 parser 2.242 2.563 608 339 Nest Hills 6,287 Irish 2,166 1,428 Nest Islip Ifellsn 091 Gorman 572 3,371 Irish 974 Italian 279 Nest Sayville Italian 0M Irish 353 37 194 other 0.062 qp4 671 Wyandench 136 493 Italian 270 Irian Yaphenk Gorman 61 60 W, ARY HWSIM STATISTICS BY WN, 1983 Candominium Senior Homeowners Mobile Citizen Subsidized Apartments(1) Cx&miniums(2) Associated(3) Hcmes(4) Housing(5) Housing(6) 3,568 957 0 500 378 501 3,by'on a 8,319 3,378 1,606 0 4,792 2,575 3c�v 14 129 35 385 0 25 :mc Hammon Town 617 112 196 0 300 894 H,rcivon Twn 7 291 1,740 290 722 758 1,142 ;,lip Tann X307 35 0 1,371 114 556 uverWd TOM307 0 0 0 0 2 shelter Island Town 1,216 548 0 15 1,170 452 S,uchcjdn Town 279 774 0 689 0 76 Wha Pt n Town *132 *41 *0 *0 *0 *27 *SL LholdAhIn 21,743 7,714 2,127 3,682 7,512 6,150 (1) Apartments in apartment complexes. See Apartments p. 80. (-) Condominiums existing and under construction. See Condominiums p. 86. (3) See Condominium Homeowners Associations p. 89. � .) Mobile Homes in mobile home parks. See Mobile Home Parks, 1983 p. 91. (5) Number of units designated for senior citizen use. See Sr. Citizen Housing p. 94. (6) See Publically Assisted Housing in Suffolk County p. 96. SECOND HOMES IN SUFFOLK COUNTY BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 1970 _ 1980 Xof XOF- Total Total Housing Housing TOWN Number Units Number Units Babylon Town 818 1.49 510 .81 Brookhaven Town 10,053 12.80 6,373 5.27 East Hampton Town 3,709 46.70 6,418 49.48 Huntington Town 793 1.47 465 .76 Islip Town 2,505 3.48 2,383 2.65 Riverhead Town 1,611 20.45 1,117 12.20 Shelter Island Town 775 52.91 602 33.11 Smithtown Town 368 1.32 262 .80 Southampton Town 7,993 37.95 10,172 35.73 Southold Town *2,660 *30.59 *3,185 *28.62 SUFFOLK COUNTY 31,285 9.36 31,487 7.29 71 t e i TOTAL HOUSING UNITS AND COMPONENTS OF THE HOUSING INVENTORY BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 Year-Round Units Occupied Units Vacant Units TOWN 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Babylon Town 54,279 62,766 53,320 61,097 958 1,569 Brookhaven Town 71,164 115,501 65,989 109,266 5, 175 6,235 East Hampton Town 6,231 7,581 3,837 5,760 2,394 1 ,821 ' Huntington Town 53,500 61 ,269 52,351 60, 142 1,149 1,127 Islip Town 70,111 87,632 68,370 84,881 1,741 2,751 Riverhead T)wn 6,483 8,130 6,084 7,492 399 638 Shelter Island Town 1,140 1,516 646 887 494 629 Smithtown Town 27,543 32,614 27,037 31,986 506 628 Southampton Town 14,468 19,291 12,123 16,747 2,345 2,544 *Southold Town *7,131 *'8,348 *5,829 *7,461 *1,302 *887 SUFFOLK COUNTY 312,050 404,648 95,586 385,719 16,463 18,929 Seasonal/ Total Units Migratory Units Number of Units Change 1970-1980 TOWN 1970 1980 1970 1980 `lumber Per cent Babylon Town 643 382 54,922 63,148 8,226 14.98 _ 3rookhaven Town 7„143 5,332 78,307 120,833 42,526 54.31 ' East Hampton Town 1,714 5,390 7,945 12,971 5,026 63.26 Huntington Town 458 316 53,958 61,585 7,627 14.14 Islip Town 2,071 2,200 72,182 89,832 17,650 24.45 Riverhead Town 1 ,450 1,028 7,933 9,158 1,225 15.44 Shelter Island Town 343 302 1,483 1,818 335 22.59 Smithtown Town 228 167 27,771 32,781 5,010 18.04 Southampton Town 6,669 9,175 21,137 28,466 7,329 34.67 *Southold Town *1,609 *2,782 8,140 *11,130 2,390 27.35 SUFFOLK COUNTY 22,328 27,074 334,378 431,722 97,344 29.11 70 VALUE OF OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 BABYLON TOWN BROOKHAVEN TOWN EAST HAMPTON TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units VALUE IN DOLLARS 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $10,000 582 85 2,110 221 125 18 $10,000-14,999 2,959 159 6,575 417 226 20 $15,000-19,999 10,505 370 12,484 1,116 434 38 $20,000-24,999 13,173 979 12,523 3,004 538 67 g25,000-34,999 10,870 7,111 12,883 20,438 643 187 $35,000-49,999 2,106 21,852 4,834 32,824 452 635 $50,000 or over 362 10,071 1,181 17,833 391 2,800 Total 40,557 40,627 52,590 75,853 2,809 3,765 HUNTINGTON TOWN ISLIP TOWN RIVERHEAD TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units VALUE IN DOLLARS 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $10,000 202 31 779 57 217 48 $10,000-14,999 1,026 47 4,313 116 447 61 $15,000-19,999 3,789 96 13,976 339 774 92 $20,000-24,999 7,656 320 17,965 1,341 682 204 $25,000-34,999 13,841 1,712 13,696 14,512 709 796 $35,000-49,999 10,541 9,440 3,324 30,847 288 1,328 $50,000 or over 6,795 35',082 1,144 12,556 95 1,586 Total 43,850 46,728 55,197 59,768 3,212 4,115 SHELTER ISLAND T. SMITHTOWN TOWN SOUTHAMPTON TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units VALUE IN DOLLARS 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $10,000 22 1 160 22 431 57 $10,000-14,999 43 1 605 36 946 72 $15,000-19,999 67 6 1,816 66 1,572 133 $20,000-24,999 83 13 4,189 202 1,697 269 $25,000-34,999 110 36 9,978 1,198 1,785 996 $35,000-49,999 90 77 5,490 8,061 1,053 2,533 $50,000 or over 94 505 1,104 16,076 848 6,662 Total 509 639 23,342 25,661 8,332 10,722 *SOUTHOLD TOWN SUFFOLK COUNTY .Number of Units Number of Units VALUE IN DOLLARS 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $10,000 221 18 4,849 558 $10,000-14,999 569 19 17,709 948 $15,000-19,999 864 60 46,281 2,316 $20,000-24,999 821 121 59,327 6,520 $25,000-34,999 935 449 65,450 47,435 $35,000-49,999 488 1,268 28,666 108,865 $50,000 or over 280 3,395 12,294 106,566 Total 4,178 5,330 234,576 273,208 t 73 TENURE OF HOUSING BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 1 9 7 0 All Occupied Units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied TOWN Total *lumber % of Total Number z of Total Babylon Town 53,320 43,240 81.10 10,080 18.90 Brookhaven Town 65,989 54,206 82.14 11,783 17.86 East Hampton Town 3,837 3,123 81.39 714 18.61 Huntington Town 52,351 45,514 86.94 6,837 13.06 Islip Town 68,370 56,789 83.06 11,581 16.94 Riverhead Town 6,084 4,462 73.34 1,622 26.66 Shelter Island Town 646 570 88.24 76 11.76 Smithtown Town 27,037 23,873 88.30 3,164 11.70 Southampton Town 12,123 9,394 77.49 2,729 22.51 *Southold Town *5,829 Yf 4,645 *19.69 X1,184 *20.31 SUFFOLK COUNTY 295,586 245,816 83.16 49,770 16.84 1 9 8 0 All Occupied Units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied TOWN Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Babylon Town 61,097 47,126 77.13 13,971 22.87 Brookhaven Town 109,266 84,903 77.70 24,363 22.30 East Hampton Town 5,760 4,534 78.72 1,226 21.28 Huntington Town 60,142 51,267 85.24 8,875 14.76 Islip Town 84,881 67,107 79.06 17,774 20.94 Riverhead Town 7,492 5,719 76.33 1,773 23.67 Shelter Island Town 887 740 83.43 147 16.57 Smithtown Town 31,986 27,903 87.24 4,083 12.76 Southampton Town 16,747 12,724 75.98 4,023 24.02 *Southold Town *7,461 5,983 *80.19 1,478 X19.81 SUFFOLK COUNTY 385,719 308,006 79.85 77,713 20.15 VACANT YEAR-ROUND HOUSING UNITS BY REASON FOR VACANCY BY TOWN, 1980 V A C A N T Y E A R - R O U N D TOTAL Total Total Total Units Total YEAR- Number Units Units For other ROUND Vacant For For Occasional Vacant TOWN UNITS Units Sale Rent Use Units Babylon Town 62,766 1,669 455 431 128 655 Brookhaven Town 115,501 6,235 1,601 1,274 1,041 2,319 East Hampton Town 7,581 1,821 224 234 1,028 335 Huntington Town 61,269 1,127 275 242 149 461 • Islip Town 87,632 2,751 763 642 183 1, 163 Riverhead Town 8,130 638 143 136 89 270 Shelter Island Town 1,516 629 20 24 300 285 Smithtown Town 32,614 628 165 128 95 240 Southampton Town 19,291 2,544 359 604 997 584 *Southold Town 8,348 *887 *117 -148 403 219 SUFFOLK COUNTY 404,648 18,929 4,122 3,863 4,413 6,531 72 SIZE OF YEAR-ROUND HOUSING UNITS BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 SIZE OF UNIT BABYLON TOWN BROOKHAVEN TOWN EAST HAMPTON TOWN (Number of Rooms) Number of Units Number of Units `lumber of Units 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 One 247 375 414 926 20 144 Two 752 1,026 994 1,704 107 209 Three 3,760 5,124 4,139 8,784 431 398 Four 7,175 7,625 10,135 15, 152 1,533 1,342 Five 10,074 10,166 13,368 20,620 1,560 1,763 Six or more 32,270 38,450 42,114 68,315 2,580 3,725 Total 54,278 62,766 71,164 115,501 6,231 7,581 SIZE OF UNIT HUNTINGTON TOWN ISLIP TOWN RIVERHEAD TOWN (Number of Rooms) Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 `ne 290 327 488 566 57 82 Two 521 878 1,014 1,316 115 150 Three 2,357 2,729 4,480 6,659 529 550 Four 4,258 4,226 7,466 9,136 1,465 1,853 Five 6,853 6,423 12,560 13,441 1,560 1,950 Six or more 39,221 r 46,686 44,103 56,514 2,757 3,545 Total 53,500 61,269 70,111 87,632 6,483 8,130 SIZE OF UNIT SHELTER ISLAND T. SMITHTOWN TOWN SOUTHAMPTON TOWN (Number of Rooms) Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 One 2 4 131 121 178 437 Two 14 17 247 321 261 404 Three 30 44 1,120 1,657 940 1,144 Four 156 133 1,965 2,114 2,870 3,152 Five 289 277 2,821 2,824 3,587 4,663 Six or more 649 1,041 21,259 25,577 6,632 9,491 Total 1,140 1,516 27,543 32,614 14,468 19,291 SIZE OF UNIT SOUTHOLD TOWN SUFFOLK COUNTY (Number of Rooms) *Number of Units Number of Units 1970 * 19880 1970 1980 One 34 55 1,861 3,037 Two 108 85 4,133 6,110 Three 326 408 18,112 27,497 Four 1,269 1,132 38,292 45,865 Five 1,632 1,731 54,304 63,858 Six or more 3,762 4,937 195,347 258,281 Total 7,131 8,348 312,049 404,648 75. low MONTHLY CONTRACT RENTS BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 BABYLON TOWN BROOKHAVEN TOWN EAST gAMPTON TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units MONTHLY RENT 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $100 1,055 123 1,929 706 232 23 $100-149 3,537 294 4,219 721 198 86 $150-199 3,633 685 3,639 1,254 81 163 $200-249 958 1 ,575 631 3,051 9 256 $250 or more 271 10,349 307 16,396 10 443 No Cash Rent 555 656 869 1,109 131 197 Total 10,009 13,682 11,594 23,237 661 1,168 HUNTINGTON TOWN ISLIP TOWN RIVERHEAD TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units MONTHLY RENT 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $100 959 219 1,376 467 516 99 $100-149 2,254 241 3,210 464 569 196 $150-199 1,906 432 4,884 753 262 203 ` $200-249 559 1,231 1,202 1,456 20 331 $250 or more 430 5,899 225 13,229 3 695 No Cash Rent 598 645 576 887 143 138 Total 6,706 8,667 11,473 17,256 1,513 1,662 MONTHLY RENT SHELTER ISLAND T. SMITHTOWN TOWN SOUTHAMPTON TOWN Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 Less than $100 29 1 379 179 900 91 $100-149 15 14 752 146 1,020 283 $150-199 3 26 1,190 194 305 626 $200-249 0 22 416 393 39 845 $250 or more 2 30 165 2,762 23 1,532 No Cash Rent 23 37 191 260 365 479 Total 72 130 3,093 3,934 2,652 3,856 MONTHLY RENT *SOUTHOLD TOWN SUFFOLK COUNTY Number of Units Number of Units 1970 #1970 -*1980 1970 1980 Less than $100 607 6 7,982 1,972 $100-149 257 136 16,031 2,581 $150-199 58 242 15,961 4,578 $200-249 15 331 3,849 9,491 $250 or more 0 374 1,436 51,709 No Cash Rent 190 212 3,641 4,620 Total 1,127 1,359 48,900 74,951 74 ■ NUMBER OF PERSONS PER ROOM BY TOWN, 1970 AND 1980 NUMBER OF PERSONS BABYLON TOWN BROOKHAVEN TOWN EAST HAMPTON TOWN HUNTINGTON T04I4, PER ROOM Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 All occupied Units 1 .00 or less 49,756 59,098 62,150 106,292 3,637 5,645 50,760 59,336 1.01 to 1.50 3,048 1,672 3,199 2,476 157 89 1,339 662 1.51 or more 516 327 640 498 43 26 252 144 Total 53,320 61,097 65,989 109,266 3,837 5,760 52,351 60,142 Owner Occupied 1 .00 or less 40,731 45,883 51,586 83,119 2,981 4,471 44,374 50,777 1.01 to 1.50 2,212 1,111 2,284 1,583 111 53 1,009 442 1.51 or more 297 132 336 201 31 10 131 43,240 47,126 54,206 84,903 3,123 4,534 45,514 51,268 Total T Renter Occupied 1.00 or less 9,025 13,215 10,564 23,173 656 1,174 6,386 8,559 1.01 to 1.50 836 561 915 893 46 36 330 220 1.51 or 219 195 304 297 12 16 121 96 Total more 10,080 13,971 11,783 24,363 714 1,226 6,837 8,875 NUMBER OF PERSONS ISLIP TOWN RIVERHEAD TOWN SHELTER ISLAND SMITHTOWN TOWN PER ROOM Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 1970 1980 All ccupie nits 1.00 or less 63,651 81,938 5,693 7,292 633 881 26,207 31,620 1.01 to 1.50 3,959 2,462 288 159 12 6 725 318 1•51 or 105 48 Total more 760 68,370 84,881' 103 41 1 0 6,084 7,492 646 887 27,037 31,986 Owner Occupied 1 .00 or less 53,250 65,245 4,234 5,615 559 736 23,244 27,638 1.01 to 1.50 3,102 1,625 180 90 11 4 570 246 1.51 or 437 237 48 14 0. 0 59 19 Total more 56,789 67,107 4,462 5,719 570 740 23,873 27,903 Renter Occupied 1.00 or less 10,401 16,693 1,459 1,677 74 145 2,963 3,982 1.01 to 1.50 857 837 108 69 1 2 155 72 46 29 1.51 or more 323 244 55 27 1 0 Total 11,581 17,774 1,622 1,773 76 147 3,164 4,083 NUMBER OF PERSONS SOUTHHAMPTON TOWN*SOUTHOLD TOWN SUFFOLK COUNTY PER ROOM Number of Units*Number of Units Number of Units 1970 1980 *1970 1980 1970 1980 ♦(X-7 Occupled units 1.00 or less 11,531 16,361 5,620 7,358 279,638 375,821 1 .01 to 1.50 478 283 168 77 13,373 8,204 1.51 or more 114 103 41 26 2,575 1,694 Total 12,123 16,747 5,829 7,461 295,586 385,719 Owner Occupied J11 1 .00 or less 9,043 12,531 5,930 234,513 301,945 1.01 to 1.50 293 159 109 47 9,881 5, 360 1.51 or more 58 34 25 6 1,422 701 Total 9,394 12,724 4,645 5,983 245,816 308,006 *Renter Occupied if 1.00 or less 2,488 3,830 1,109 1,428 45,125 73,876 1.01 to 1.50 185 124 59 30 3,492 2,844 • 1.51 or more 56 69 16 20 1,153 993 Total 2,729 4,023 1,184 1,478 49,770 77,713 t 76 YEAR-ROUND HOUSING UNITS BY YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT BY TOWN, 1980 lits 30 Total 19.79 1975 1970 I. Year-round to to to )62 TOWN Housing Units 3/80 1978 1974 Le-,. 1` Babylon Town 62,797 299 2,069 5,401 Brookhaven Town 115,600 2,202 14,347 26,671 777 777East Hampton Town 7,840 302 767 947 Huntington Town 61,322 744 2,134 4,828 21 Islip Town 87,614 742 4,474 12,380 Riverhead Town 8,222 87 535 1,413 559 Shelter Island Town 1,538 33 113 201 2 Smithtown Town 32,630 707 1,561 3,239 3� J Southampton Town 19,623 441 1,608 2,705 Southold Town 8,481 144 * 655 * 852 SUFFOLK COUNTY 405,667 5,701 28,263 58,637 1960 1950 1940 1939 7 g 30 to to to or TOWN 1969 1959 1949 Earlier i; 3 Babylon Town 17,016 23,110 6,661 8,241 4a X86 Brookhaven Town 3x,447 18,931 8,399 13,603 East Hampton Town 1,886 1,157 655 2,126 Huntington Town 19,212 19,372 5,081 9,951 ?� Islip Town 30,080 24,127 5,486 10,325 19 Riverhead Town 2,185 1,415 791 1,796 9C Shelter Island Town 300 232 98 561 3! Smithtown Town 15,482 7,376 1,575 2,690 Southampton Town 4,695 3,726 1,496 4,952 ;a *Southold Town X1,364 1,490 (654 *3,322 F SUFFOLK COUNTY 123,667 100,936 30,896 57,567 MEDIAN VALUE OF SPECIFIED OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS, 1970 AND 1980 TOWN 1970 1980 Babylon Town 22,400 42,900 Brookhaven Town 22,000 39,500 East Hampton Town 26,300 70,000 Huntington Town 31,700 66,700 Islip Town 22,400 40,000 Riverhead Town 21,200 44,400 Shelter Island Town 28,600 72,300 Smithtown Town 29,900 57,200 Southampton Town 23,600 60,200 *Southold Town 22,600 59,300 SUFFOLK COUNTY 24,100 45,600 77 PUBLICALLY ASSISTED HOUSING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY (Cont 'd) ot�ject Name Program Year Type of Units Contact Agency or or and address Type Completed Family Sr. Cit . Total Management Agency rbcL 0UTgjA,,4FTON TOWN vide Single n.a. 3 0 3 S.C.D.C. Family 625 `fiddle Country Rd. y Rd, Home Coram, NY Program TOvn Wide Existing as of n.a. n.a. 26 S.C.D.0 Section 10/82 625 Middle Country Rd. y Rd. 80d) Coram NY wide Home n.a. 16 0 16 S.C.D.C. Improve- 625 Middle Country Rd. ment Coram, NY Program FMHA n.a. 0 31 31 FMHA Ar"try Rd. Dept. j0ptan Bays, NY of Agri- culture i SOUTHAMPTON TOWN TOTAL 19 31 76(a) ;OUTHOLD TOWN ohn fR°• •awn wide Existing * as of *n.a. n.a. *2 S.C.D.C. [Section 10/82 625 Middle Country Rd. For 8 (ld) Coram, NY "am wide Home *n.a. *5 0 4(5 S.C.D.C. Improvement 625 Middle Country Rd. (2) Coram, NY ;�- y Rd Tom wide *Single Fam. *n.a. X20 0 X20 S.C.1)X. Home 625 Middle Country Rd. Program Coram, NY un y Rd. *SOUTHOLD TOWN TOTAL 4[ 25 0 *27(a) SUFFOLK COUNTY TOTAL 1,988 3,070 5,959(a) :al does SUFFOLK COUNTY PROPOSED 60 104 164 (') The type of unit information was not available in all instances therefore the total does not equal the sum of its parts. 103 CONDOMINIUMS (Cont'd) No. of Community Name Address Units Acreage TOWN Of SOUTHAMPTON (Cont'd) 7.1 T Tuckahoe Southampton Commons(2) Hubbard Lane 37 Tuckahoe Southampton Trace (2) Hubbard Lane 32 478 Water Mill Mecox Landing Montauk Hwy. 38 1.9 Rd Dune . Westhampton Beach Seascape 539 41 6.1 Westhampton Beach High Dune 367 Dune Rd. 30 4.2 La t Sevens . b Westhampton Beach Westhampton Landings Mitchell Rd. 139 12.9 Westhampton Beach Yardarm Beach Dune Rd. Condominium Club Oune Rd. 14 2.5 Westhampton Beach Beynwr 5 .9 Westhampton Beach Spindrlft Dune Rd. Tho Patio Sunset Ave. 24 1.0 Westhampton Beach 43 Westhampton Beach Driftwood Harbor (2) 587 84.7 Total Existing 187 9+ Total Under Construction 306 65.3 Total Planned 1,082 159.0 SW~TON TOWN TOTAL y y TOWN OF SOUTHOLO T T Middle Country Rd. 17 3.5 Greenport Sea Breeze Village Cleaves Point Village Shipyard La. 24 4.8 Greenport West 41 9.3 Total Existing 41 8.3 SOUTHOLD TOM/ TOTAL (1)Under construction (2)Planned (P.R.C.) - Planned Retirement Community Suffolk County Total Existing 7,347 Total Under Construction 367 Total Planned 1,604 Suffolk County Total 9,318 88 APARTMENTS (Cont'd) No. of amu` Name Address Units Acreage ��� THAMPTON � 50U ampton Bays Town S Country Apartments 1-128 Lamplight Circle 128 8.0 ,amp ton Bays Apartments Montauk Hwy. 10 1.0 5 �pnk Mark-Kal Terrace Montauk Hwy. b Depot Rd. 24 2.5 oesthampton Beach Country Style Garden Apts. 325 Montauk Hwy. 24 2.4 ,Othampton Beach Harbour House 36 Library Ave. 52 4.2 Westhampton Beach Ocean Bay Apartments Jessup La. 24 2.0 flesthampton Beach Westhampton Beach Apts. 62 Oak St. 17 1.1 SOJTHA-PTON TOWN TOTAL 279 21.2 ,VL-OwN OF SOUTHOLD Souty Id Colonial Village 52965 Main Rd. 31 2.7 West Greenport Driftwood Cove Main Rd. 101 7.1 *SIJTHGLD TOWN TOTAL 132 9.8 } f SUFFOLK COUNTY TOTAL 21,743 2,135.0 { t f I q . '"4� r. w0. , r i' �_._...-.•..- <,t,,,. -u ft BABYLON - Apartment Complex 85 SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMUNITIES: TOTAL HOUSING UNITS AND PERCENT OF TOTAL HOUSING UNITS HELD FOR SEASONAL AND OCCASIONAL USE, 1980 (Conc'd. ) tt Total Percent Total Percent Housing of Housing of rea Name Units Total(1) Area Name Units Total(1) ape -Hit-her Hills 451 82.0 Sag Harbor V. 1 ,786 32.2 unset 3,080 1.0 Saltaire V. 357 94.1 vesc V 454 4.8 Sayville 3,751 .6 v3rchAmity ague Varth vi1le 3,956 .1 Selden 5,108 1.8 Vorch Babylon 5,767 .0 Setauket-East Setauket 3,066 .8 Vorch day Shore 9,899 .1 Shelter Is. Heights 1,039 39.0 Vorch Bellport 2,080 .7 Shelter Island 748 23. 1 North Great River 3,127 .3 Shinnecock Indian Reserv. 104 .0 Vorch Haven V. 459 27.8 Shinnecock Hills 2,011 53.4 Vorth Lindenhurst 3,494 .1 Shirley 5,632 5.5 Vorch Patchogue 2,475 2.3 Shoreham V. 189 10.5 North Sea 944 49.5 Smithtown 8,739 .4 Vorchport Veterans Hosp. 13 .0 Sound Beach 3,315 16.5 Vorthport V. 2,770 .5 South Huntington 4,607 .4 Vorthville 944 4.9 Southampton V. 2,542 28.6 Northwest Harbor 1,766 37,4 *Southold [2,871 *27.2 Voyack 2,149 44.9 Springs 2,524 42.8 Oakdale 2,573 .7 St. James 3,826 1.1 Ocean Beach V. 633 85.4 Stony Brook 5,204 3.4 Old Field V. 290 6.8 Suffolk Developmental Ctr. 20 .0 Orient - East Marion 1,219 44.2 SUNY at Stony Brook 71 35.2 Patchogue V. 4,730 1.0 Tuckahoe 538 23.2 ?econic 601 30.9 Village of the Branch 488 .4 Pilgrim Psych. Ctr. 44 2.2 Wading River 2,081 26.8 Paospatuck Indian Resery 59 5.0 Wainscott 389 49.3 ?oquott V. 261 13.7 Watermill & Sagaponak 884 50.9 Port Jefferson Sta. 4,800 .5 West Babylon 12,749 .5 Port Jefferson V. 2,355 .5 West Bay Shore 1,581 .5 Quiogue 395 29.1 West Hills 1,901 .4 Quogue V. 947 51.4 West Islip 8,477 .3 3 Re-nsenburg-gpeonk 1,046 27.3 West Sayville 2,596 .3 l Ridge 4,0.24 4.8 Westhampton 1,438 18.8 3 Riverhead 2,612 1.9 Westhampton Beach Uninc. 514 95.3 L Riverside-Flanders 2,443 16.5 Westhampton Beach V. 2,026 63,2 Rocky Point 3,726 16.4 Wyandanch 3,672 .3 3 Yaphank 1,051 4.8 5 9 (L) Percent of Housing Untis held for seasonal and occasional use. 2 79 i COMMUNITY PROFILES Legislative Districts N.Y.S. N.Y.S. U.S. Suffolk Community Torn Assembly Senate Congress Legislation Farmingviile Brookhaven 1,3 2 1 3,4 Fire Island Brookhaven b Islip 3,5 3 1 3,11 Fishers Is. Southold 1 1 1 i .Fort Salonga Huntington b Smithtown 6,9 2 3 7,18 Gilgo-Oak Beach Babylon 8 4 2 14 Gordon Heights Brookhaven 1 1 1 2 Great River Islip 8 3 2 9,10 Green Iawn Huntington 9,10 2,5 3 17,18 Greenport V. Southold 1 1 *1 *'1 Greenport West Southold 1 1 1 1 Hampton Bays Southampton 2 1 1 Hampton Park Southampton 2 1 1 Hauppauge Smithtown b Islip 6,7 2,3 1,2,3 6,8,5,10 Head of the Harbor V. Smithtown 6 2 1 7 Holbrook Brookhaven b Islip 3,5 2,3 1,2 3,6,8 Holtsville Brookhaven b Islip 3 2,3 1,2 3,8 Huntington Huntington 9,10 5 3 17,18 Hunting-on Say V. Huntington 9 5 3 18 HuntrngYon Station Huntington 10 5 3 17 ls:'p Islip 5,8 3,4 2 10 Islip Terrace Islip 0 3 2 9 Jamesport Riverhead 1 i 1 1 Kings Park Smithtown 6 2 3 7 Lake grove V. Brookhaven 7 2 1 5,0C Lake Ronkonkoma Brookhaven, Islip b Smithtown 3,6,7 2,3 1,2 6,8, Laurel Southold I 1 1 Lindenhurst V. Babylon 11 4 2 Lloyd Harbor V. Huntington 10 5 3 1 Manorville Brookhaven 2 1 1 2,16 Mastic Brookhaven 2 1 1 2 Mastic Beach Brookhaven 2 1 1 2 Mattituck Southold 1 1 1 1 Medford Brookhaven 1,2,3 1,2,3 1 2,3,4 Melville Huntington 10 5 2,3 14,15 Middle Island Brookhaven 1 1 1 1,2 Miller Place Brookhaven 4 1 1 1,4- Montauk East Hampton 2 1 1 16 Mount Sinal Brookhaven 4 1 1 4 Napeague-Hither Hills East Hampton 2 1 1 16 Nesconset Smithtown 6 2 1 6 38 TOWN AND COUNTY PROFILES RIVERHEAD SHELTER ISLAND SMITHTOWN SOUTHAMPTON SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COON TOWN AND COUNTY PROF IIF S 1 1 6 2 1 1 through It 70WN BABYLON BROOKMAVEN EAST T HAMPTON HUNTINGTON _ISLIP 1 1 2 1 1 1,2,3,4,5 pi N.Y.S. ASSEMBLY DISTRICT(S) 8,10,11 1,2,3,4,7 2 9,10 3,5,7,8 1 1 1,3 1 1 1,2,3 pt. N.Y.S. SENATORIAL OISTRICT(S) 4,5 1,2,3 1 2,4,5 3,4 1 1 6.7,15 16 1 1 through 1P U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT(S) 2 1 1 2 3 2 (See School District Map In Map Section at end of this volume) SUFFOLK LEGISLATIVE OISTRICT(S) 12,13,14 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,16 16 14,15,11,18 8,9,10,11,15 SCHOOL DISTRICT (See School District Map In May Section at end of this volume) 78 11.5 55 145 69 92, LAM AREA (Square Mlles) 53 325 64 94 110 20,243 2,071 116,663 43,146 19,172 1,284,231 '6.0 TOTAL POPULATION 1980 203,487 365,017 13,029 201,512 296,897 7.' 1.7 19.3 14.1 13.9 Percent change 1970-1980 -0.0 48.8 27.8 1.0 7.2 INCOME 1979 18,688 19,762 28,813 19,407 21,013 24,195 Median Family (3) 23,324 22,270 20,361 70,356 23,561 15,662 16,875 27,314 16,668 18,122 22,359 Median Household (s) 21,931 20,855 16,668 26,155 22,165 6,880 10,956 8,149 8,633 8,258 7,581 Per Capita f3) 7,107 6,793 9,453 9,043 6,860 2,167 146 4,516 3,572 1,212 82,087 Persons Belo-Poverty - Number 13.937 27,006 1,308 7,192 20,951 11.0 7.1 4.0 8.5 6.4 6.6 -Percent 7.0 7.6 10.0 3.7 7.2 EDUCATION 125 Yrs. Old 6 Over) 12.3 12.9 12.8 12.6 12.6 12.4 Median School Years Completed 12.7 12.6 -12.7 13.0 12.5 60.8 78.0 79.9 73.1 72.6 74.0 Percent H.S. Grad. 68.3 74.0 71.2 81.6 70.4 11.5 25.6 22.1 18.8 19.8 17.9 Percent College Grad. 10.6 17.2 22.6 30.4 12.6 EMPLOYMENT Total White Collor - Number 46,630 82,760 3,309 63,7•' 65,050 4,178 305 32,699 9,611 4,188 312,521 Percent 36.5 59.2 56.4 69.8 52.3 51.4 53.8 65.0 55.6 56.3 58.0 Total Unemployed - Number 6,045 10,537 607 4,667 8,431 605 78 2,495 1,201 533 35,199 Percent 6.2 6.9 9.4 4.9 6.3 6.9 9.8 4.7 6.5 6.7 6.1 AGE Total Under 5 -Number 12,975 31,016 637 11,032 20,582 Percent 6.4 8.5 4.5 5.5 6.9 1,247 84 6,190 2,317 1,010 87,090 Total 5 to 17 -Number 47,961 94,351 2,256 49,218 78,119 6.2 4.1 5.3 5.4 5.3 6.8 Percent 23.6 25.8 16.1 24.4 26.1 3,802 344 31,277 7,643 3,517 318,688 Total 18 to 21 -Number 16,026 24,316 655 13,598 21,167 18.8 16.6 26.8 18.2 18.3 24.8 Percent 7.9 6.7 4.7 6.7 7.1 1,128 34 8,469 2,817 775 88,985 Total Over 65 -Number 16,399 30,551 2,720 15,752 23,355 5.6 1.6 7.3 6.5 4.0 6.9 Percent 0.1 6.4 19.4 7.8 7.8 3,893 620 9,936 8,036 4,439 115,701 Median Ape 29.6 27.9 41.1 31.9 28.8 19.2 29.9 8.5 18.6 23.2 9.0 RACE 8 ETHNICITY 37.0 50.0 31.2 37.0 43.1 30.0 Total White -Number 172,105 344,741 13,105 191,775 274,620 Percent 84.6 94.4 93.4 95.2 91.9 Total Bleck -Number 28,266 12,220 718 6,599 15,894 17,396 2',055 114,595 38,685 16,192 1,187,269 Percent 13.9 3.3 5.1 3.3 5.3 85.9 99.2 98.2 89.7 94.9 92.4 Total Spanish Origin 8,201 16,715 274 4,897 26,064 2,687 5 924 3,762 824 71,901 13.3 0.2 0.8 8.7 4.3 5.6 246 17 2,042 660 236 58,451 26 27 ASSESSED VALUATION, TAX LEVIES, INDEBTEDNESS, REVENUES, AND EXPENDITURES ASSESSED VALUATION, TAX LEVIES, INDEBTEDNESS, REVENUES, AND EXPENDITURES Y BOBJECT AND FUNCTION FOR THE COUNTY, TOWNS, AND VILLAGES IN SUFFOLK. 1980 BY OBJECT AM FUNCTION FOR THE COUNTY, TOWNS, AND VILLAGES IN SUFFOLK, 1980 MAJOR MUNICIPALITY Land ASSESSED VALUATION CONSTITUTIONAL POPULATION Area OF REAL PROPERTY(SqREAL ESTATE a:a• e 1980 ■i.) ($000) xempt TAX LIMIT PROVISION ($000) State imitation or az evy Tax Levy Tax 1 SUFFOLK CO. 1,284,231 911.0 Equali- Operating Subject ($000) Collection 5,220,004 990,575 zation Purposes to Limit Performance 2 Babylon Town 203,483 53.6 Rate ($000) ($000) (z) 3 Amityville 9,076 244,334 45,146 4 Babylon 12,388 2'2 39,617 24.40 267,645 126,535 164,308 1 S Lindenhurst 22,919 2'5 35,722 3.8 34,747 9.69 2 6 Brookhaven Town 364,812 253.4 24.88 2,586 1,554 1,159 99.94 3 7 Belle Terre 826 399.484 135,501 18.63 3,119 946 1,154 99.90 4 8 Bellport 2,809 •8 2,303 --_ 12.56 4,816 1,354 1,567 99.13 5 9 Lake Grove 9,692 1.4 41,753 --- 10 Old Pield 3.0 10,978 7.45 6 829 --- --- --- --- 11 Patchogue 11,291 2'0 2.170 --_ 9.71 362 14] 152 100.00 1 12 Poquott 588 2'2 29,014 -__ 78.98 737 279 338 99.92 8 L3 Port Jefferson 6,731 '5 12,800 7.48 2,495 275 296 100.00 9 14 Shoreham 555 3'S 20,206 7.88 438 109 115 100.00 LO '1 1,538 --- - 20.47 2,125 740 921 99.29 it 15 Last Hampton Town 14,029 69,7 100.02 188 29 29 100 00 12 886 73,408 10,493 9.15 3,019 630 842 100 00 13 16 Lot Hampton 1,581 4.1 16,581 _ 9.74 219 118 119 98.76 14 17 Sag Harbor 2 2.0 9,489 18 Huntington Town 201. 90.2 6.90 --- --- 15 635 19 Asharoken 294,958 47,875 7.81 3,137 1,370 1,509 100.00 16 8 20 Huntington Bay 1,783 ' 10,776 --- 11.30 1,259 497 543 99.46 17 1 2L Lloyd Harboc .0 3,505 ___ 22 Northport 3.405 9.2 8,363 7.64 --- 18 ,651 2.5 14,579 --_ 30.16 566 186 186 100.00 19 23 Islip Town 298,897 106.0 7.12 752 267 267 100 00 20 ,286 3,728,687 618,216 7.16 1,747 782 790 99 69 21 24 Braghtwaters 3 25 Ocean Beach 155 1 0 60,928 -� 10.47 1,999 1,700 26 Saltaire .3 2,562 ___ 1,793 99.52 22 35 .3 2,891 --- 101.25 23 110.70 878 341 389 99 24 24 27 Riverhead Town 20,243 67.6 50,406 25,844 8.64 469 334 384 97.75 25 28 Shelter Is. Town 2,071 12.5 14.62 305 227 301 99.71 26 29 Dering Harbor 16 21.838 1,399 .3 631 --- 9.75 --- --- --- --- 27 30 Smithtown Town 116,663 54.0 31 Head of the Harbor 1,023 182,741 51,660 15.90 --- ___ 28 32 Nissequogue 2.4 2,741 --_ 11.61 60 58 66 94 17 29 33 The Branch 1,462 3.6 4,337 --- 1.707 1.0 4.156 --- 10.13 --- --- - --- 30 34 Southampton Town 42,849 142.4 8.20 521 174 188 99.48 31 35 North Haven 738 150,467 41,678 9.Oi 845 200 242 99 23 32 36 Quogue 2.5 2,465 -- 10.52 568 54 54 100.00 33 3 966 4.9 8,859 ___ 7 Sag Harbor See East Hampton Town 8,48 34 38 Southamp[on 4 000 5.6 39 Westhampton Beach 1649 27.970 --- 5.84 V603 53 53 98 71 35 2.9 14,417 7.52 1,799 342 352 100 00 36 41 8wchold Town *19,172 1 M 37 41 Greenport Village 2�Y73 ^54:5 72.479 12,081 11.82 3,425 1,472 1,494 100 00 38 3,855 --_ 9.75 1,931 711 151 9y100 UO 39 *11.19 *--- =-- * --- T--- *"40 232 12.24 510 158 2b6 96 98 41 233 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS of ! of Central Business Distract Street Stores Central Business District Street_ Storrs HUNTINGTON TOWN TOTAL - 7 838 RIVERHEAD TOWN TOTAL - 2 162 Cold Spring Harbor Main St. 39 Riverhead Main St. 146 Huntington Main St. 334 James port Main St. 16 Halesite 'low York Ave. 32 Northport aaln St. 94 SOUTHOLO TOWN TOTAL - 4 )� 139 Hu-"ngton Station New York Ave. 183 Mattituck Love Lane 28 Gre ewn Broadway 60 Cutchogue Main Road 21 Eas )rthport Larkfleld Rd. 94 Southold Main Road 24 Greenport Main St. 116 BABY'- TOWN TOTAL - 7 578 Wyandanch Straight Path 57 SOUTHAMPTON TOWN TOTAL - 7 576 Door Park Deer Park Ave. 62 Westhampton Beach Main St. 99 North Babylon Deer Park Ave. 33 East Quogus Montauk Hwy. 16 Amityville Broadway Ave. 113 Hampton Bays Montauk Hwy. 30 Copiague Great Neck Rd. 42 Southampton Main St. 224 Lindenhurst Wellwood Ave. 112 WatermiII Montauk Hwy. 26 Babylon Main St. 159 Srldgehampton Montauk Hwy. 57 Sag Harbor Main St. 104 SMITHTOWN TOWN TOTAL - 3 255 Kings Park Malo St. 58 EAST HAMPTON TOWN TOTAL - 3 204 St. James Lake St. 66 East Hampton Main St. 122 Smithtown Main St. 131 Amagansett Main St. 31 Montauk Montauk Hwy. 51 ISLIP TOWN TOTAL - 9 598 Brentwood Second Ave. 49 Central Islip Carleton Ave. 60 SUFFOLK COUNTY TOTAL - 56 4,306 West Islip Highble Lane 51 Brightwaters Orinoco Or. 33 Bay Shore Main St. 179 Islip Montauk Hwy. 57 East Islip Main St. 40 West Sayville Montauk Hwy. 20 Sayville Main St. 109 BROOKHAVEN TOWN TOTAL - 14 906 Stony Brook Main St. 25 Setauket Main St. 52 Port Jefferson Main St. 142 Port Jefferson Station Main St. 54 Rocky Point Broadway 29 Ronkonkoma Hawkins Ave. 61 Medford Medford Rd. 49 Patchogue Main St. 238 East Patchogue E. Main St. 75 8ellport S. Country Rd. 46 Mastic Beach Neighborhood Rd. 41 Center Moriches Main St. 47 East Moriches Montauk Hwy. 21 Eastport Main St. 26 174 APPENDIX B PLANT LIST TABLE PLANT LIST WITH RELATIVE ABUNDANCE SPECIES Old Field Marginal Acer pseudoplantanus Planetree Maple S Agrostis tenuis Bent Grass R Andropogon scoparius Little Bluestem S F Apocynum cannabinum Indian Hemp S Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed F Aster vimineus Small Aster S Baccharis halimifolia Groundsel Bush S Betula populifolia Gray Birch F C ichorium intybus Chickory F Erigeron strigosus Daisy Fleabane S S Festuca myuros Fescue F S Hieracium pratense Field Hawkweed C C Hypericum perforatum Common St. Johnswort S Hypochaeris radicata Cat's-Ear F Juncus dichotomus Rush F Juniperus virginiana Eastern Redcedar S Lactuca serriola Wild Lettuce F Linaria canddensis Old Field Toad Flax F F Lonicera morrowi Bush Honeysuckle F Lonicera japonica Japanese Honeysuckle C Morus alba White Mullberry R Myrica pensylvanica jTorthern Bayberry S Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern S Panicum lanuginosum Panic Grass F Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper S Plantago lanceolata English Plantain C Polytrichum sp. Moss C Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen F Prunus serotina Black Cherry S Poa compressa Canada Bluegrass F C Quercus velutina Black Oak F Ro binia pseudoacacia Black Locust S Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose F S Rhus copallinum Shining Sumac S Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac S Rhus radicans Poison Ivy S Rubus allegheniensis Black Raspberry F Rumex acetosella Red Sorrel C Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod C C Solidago juncea Early Goldenrod C C Solidago nemoralis Gray Goldenrod F Solidago rugosa Rough-stemmed Goldenrod C C Solidago tenuifolia Slender-leaved Goldenrod S S Trifolium hybridum Alsike Clover F Verbascum thapsus Mullein F Vitis labrusca Fox Grape F Key: C - Common S - Several F - Few R - Rare VEGETATION. The vegetation of the subject site was inventoried in June of 1988, at which time the majority of species occupying the parcel were either in flower or fruiting. Two distinct associations occur on the site: 1) old field and 2) second-growth woodland. The former occupies all of the parcels agricultural soils where the topography is flattish, the latter occupies the uneven topography on the parcel's extreme south. A more mature forest type---oak-hickory hardwood association---is situated around the periphery of the parcel's northwest boundary. (Table ) Old Field The site's old field vegetation represents an early stage in succession on prime agricultural soils on eastern Long Island once farming has ceased. The particular type seen on the subject parcel is typical of flat farmlands with loamy soils used for row crops on an annual basis. The parcel's soil conditions---regularly nutrified and tilled topsoils---have resulted from a long history of active f a ming. Succession on Long Island agricultural soils of poor or marginal quality , excessively porosity,,Iand/or extreme topography is more often typified by the growth of drought resistant grasses (e.g. little bluestem, sheep fescue), followed by bayberry, sumacs, d red cedar and other woody plants more adaptable to poor soil conditions. In the present sere the dominant species are the goldenrods (Solidago spp.) and the introduced hawkweed (Hieracium pratense) both of which are robust perennials that perennate by runners or stolons. These offshoots give rise to rosettes of leaves that produce stems and flowers in the next year. Consequently, they are rapid colonizers of land recently left fallow. Additionally, all of the goldenrods and the hawkweed produce fertile seeds (achenes) which have hair-like appendages attached, adapting them for windborn dispersal. The combination of shoots and seeds has resulted in a relatively uniform stand of these species that covers all of the parcel's land that was here-to-fore farmed. The few exceptions are dirt trails (tractor roads) and gulleys where the soils are either too compressed or too worn to be colonized by these species. VEGETATION/Penny-2 These last areas are of relatively small size. They are occupied by a sparser, lower vegetation consisting of grasses (e.g. , Festuca myuros) and various forbs (e.g. , alsike clover) . All of the common old field herbaceous species with the exception of the sensitive fern and Polytrichum mosses are found flowering and fruiting on the peripheral marginal lands. Inasmuch as these species are opportunistic, i.e. ,aggressive and weedy, it would be expected that they would be among the early colonizers, the pioneers, so to speak, comprising the first seral stage. The addition of the fern and the moss would not be unusual as they often colonize old fields and are able to do so by dissemination by way of spores over many miles. Damp soil conditions during the early spring before the onset of active herbaceous grown would be suitable to their propagation and spread. The second seral stage is already in progress. This sere is repre- sented by the several woody species scattered throughout the goldenrod-- hawkweed field. All of those found on the site are known colonizers. The gray birch is a solitary colonizer, while the quaking aspen tends to form dense stands. Multiflora rose also tends to form dense stands, inside of which little else grows. All three species prefer loamysoils to sandy ones, with the two trees preferring mesophytic conditions, and they do equally well on hydric soils(as does the sensitive fern) . The groundsel bush is most typically found in saltmarshes landward of the saltmarsh hay zone. However, it is a colonizer disseminating its plumose seeds over long distances, and is found sporadically over a wide range of old field soils. It should be noted that none of the aforementioned woodies are more than a few years old and so the second seral stage is very young. Although the deciduous woods to the northwest contains many typical deciduous hadwoods (oaks, sassafras, etc.) , it is interesting that none of them Are presently colonizing the field. Neither are black cherry and eastern red cedar, found in the periphery, because the two would have a hard time establishing in amongst such a dense stand of vigorously competitive forbs. VEGETATION/Penny--3 It would be expected that black locusts would eventually begin to establish with the other woody species as the soil nitrogen is exhausted as they are adept nitrogen fixers and already occupy the marginal periphery. At this point in time it is fair to say that a form of"sweepstakes" succession is underway. Any number of woody species may invade the field and temporarily win out over others. However, if left alone it is safe to say that the field will grow up into a second growth forest dominated by an oak-hickory association. Such succession will take at least 50 years. The marginal edge association on the periphery of the old field is richer in species (see Table ) , more mature, but, still, decidely second- growth and weedy in composition. The planetree maples and black locusts are just a few of the introduced species that are indicative of this disturbed association's present status. This area also contains a rich assemblage of second-growth forest types including forbs, shrubs, vines, saplings and semi-mature trees. Between the old field and this marginal forest is an ecotonal area containing elements of both associations. As mentioned above this association serves as a jumping off place for colonizing the old field, inasmuch as it is immediately proximate to the old field and contains several species which are typical old field colonizers (e.g. , multiflora rose) . Endangered And Threatened Species A few of the species (e.g. , northern bayberry) are on the state's protected list, but none of the species found on the site are on the state or federal endangered and threatened list, nor is anyone of them on the state Heritage list. It is expected that a late summer-early fall survey would turn up additional herbaceous species, but it is not expected that any endangered or threatened speices will be found because of the disturbed nature of the site. APPENDIX C WATER SUPPLY REPORT HENDERSON AND BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS WATER SUPPLY REPORT SEACROFT AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK REVISION: AUGUST 13, 1984 PAGE Branch Offices: Partners: ORLANDO,FLORIDA 4IDE RS RUSSELL S.BODWELL ROSEMONT, ILLINOIS Q JOHN J.PRICE PISCATAWAY,NEW JERSEY 2 STEVEN L.SAMET MASON,OHIO o e HALL CLARKE J JAMES DELAND Main Office: AW- - ��/ 120 EXPRESS STREET ANGUS D HENDERSON v CONSULTANT PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803 e OD PAUL H.ULATOWSKI ASSOCIATE CONSULTING ENGINEERS HENDERSON AND BODWELL 120 EXPRESS STREET, PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803 516-935-8870 August 13, 1984 Mr . Richard Cron Cron & Cron Main Road P.O. Box 953 Cutchogue, NY 11935-0032 Re: Water Supply Report Seacroft at Cutchogue Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Dear Mr . Cron: { Enclosed are copies of the revised report on the above subject dated July 1, 1984 . Please mark "superceded" or destroy all previous copies in your possession. The changes made in the report include: 1. Revision of population to reflect the usage of a strictly adult community ( 2 persons per dwelling unit) 2. Elimination of the demand of the former proposed shopping center, which is no longer proposed 3 . Adjustment of the "Table of Water Supply Demands" to reflect the reduced population now anticipated 4. Reduction in the capacity of the two wells proposed from 75 gpm to 50 gpm each (note that one is still a spare) All corrections to text will be found on page 1. Very41ysse RSB/dm Enc. cc: Mr. P. Ponturo HENDERSON AND BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Population to be Served. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Water Supply Demands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ProposedWell Source. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Storage Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Service Pumping Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Fire Pump Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Treatment of the Source of Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Distribution System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Disinfection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Pumping Station Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Appendix "A" : Tests of the Water Bearing Strata Summary. . . . . 5 Memo of Record, April 5, 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Memo of Record, April 16, 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Appendix "B" : Water Analysis Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Analyses by New York Testing Laboratories. . . .11 Analyses by Suffolk County Health Services. . 18A Appendix "C" : Sketches of Proposed Installations, etc. . . . . . 19 Sketch No. 1 General arrangement and Water Distribution System. . . . . . . . . .20 Sketch No. 2 Well Site , Treatment Plant, and Pump Station Arrangement. . . . .21 Sketch No. 3 Pump Station Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Sketch No. 4 Typical Well Installation. . . . 23 Sketch No. 5 Selection and Capacity of Pumping Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . .24 HENDERSON AND BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS WATER SUPPLY REPORT SEACROFT AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK INTRODUCTION The proposed "Seacroft" community is planned as an adult condominium type community, comprising some 160 apartments grouped in about 40 buildings. A recreational area, clubhouse, and swimming pool will be provided. POPULATION TO BE SERVED 160 dwelling units at 2 persons per dwelling unit = 320. WATER SUPPLY DEMANDS (ESTIMATED) Average day 320 x 100 gpd/cap = 32 ,000 gpd Allow for clubhouse, pool , etc. = 2,000 gpd Total average day demand = 34 ,000 gpd , or 24 gpm + Maximum day at 4 times average = 136,000 gpd, or 95 gpm + Peak hour rate at 9 1/2 times Average = 13 ,460 gph + or 225 gpm + PROPOSED WELL SOURCE TO MEET DEMANDS It is proposed to install two wells, each of about 50 gpm capacity, to meet the average day and peak day demands. Peak hour demands would be met from storage. Each well is expected to be about 88 feet deep, constructed of cemented 6 inch diameter steel casing and furnished with 5 foot of stainless steel screen. Each well would be equipped with a deep well turbine pump capable of delivering 50 gpm against a total delivery head of 40 feet. Discharge from each well is to be separately metered, and each will be equipped with its own sampling cock , and blowoff. The wells would discharge into an 100 ,000 gallon storage tank. A protection zone with a 200 foot radius is to be provided as a protection against contamination, and the land about the wells will be graded so as to protect them from run-off during rainy weather . 1 HENDERSON ANG BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Information regarding testing of the water bearing strata , and expected quality of the supply as shown by laboratory analysis , will be found in the appendices. STORAGE RESERVOIR A steel storage reservoir 28 feet in diameter and 24 feet high ( 22 feet working depth) would be installed near the center of the 3 acre well site. This reservoir would provide a storage, when full , of 100 ,000 gallons. It is planned that this tank be of bolted steel construction with all metal , inside and out, shop coated with oven-baked epoxy. The tank would be supported on a concrete ring footing , and have an epoxied steel bottom. The two well pumps will discharge into this reservoir . Water levels in the reservoir will be used to start and stop the well pumps. SERVICE PUMPING EQUIPMENT Two service pumps, each rated 120 gpm at 140 feet total delivery head, would 'be provided to meet normal demands on the system. These pumps would discharge into a 5,000 gallon hydropneumatic tank and would be started and stopped by the pressures in the tank. Both these pumps would be stopped at tank pressure of 75 psi . One pump would start when pressure dropped to 60 psi , and the second pump would start when pressure dropped to 55 psi . Under these conditions, inspection of pump curves discloses that with the water level in the storage tank 10 feet above ground , pump capacity would be available as follows: Capacity Capacity Tank Pressure 1 pump 2 pumps psi T.D.H. Operating Operating 75 + 156 + 0 gpm 0 gpm 70 + 145 + 115 230 65 + 134 + 145 290 60 + 123 + 175 350 55 + 112 + 205 410 50 + 100 + 230 460 -2- HENDERSON AND BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FIRE PUMP EQUIPMENT The storage reservoir , two-third full , would be able to furnish a fire flow of 500 gpm for a two hour period . A separate pump, capable of delivering 500 gallons per minute against a total delivery head of 160 feet would thus furnish a reasonable water supply for fire use to the community. Examination of the pump curves indicates deliveries would be available as shown in the following table. (Note that a pressure relief valve would be installed to prevent shocks to the system on quick shut-down of a fire hydrant and that its use will restrict discharge pressure to 75 psi ) . 2 Service Fire Pump Pumps Total psi T.D.H. Delivery Delivery Flow 75 + 156 ft. + 360 gpm 0 gpm 360 gpm 70 + 145 ft. + 545 gpm 230 gpm 775 gpm 65 + 134 ft. + 570 gpm 290 gpm 860 gpm 60 + 123 ft. + 600 gpm 350 gpm 950 gpm 55 + 112 ft. + 630 gpm 410 gpm 1040 gpm 50 + 100 ft. + 655 gpm 460 gpm 1115 gpm TREATMENT OF THE SOURCE OF SUPPLY Water Analysis data presently available indicates no treatsent other than chlorination is likely to be needed. However , as it is possible that over the years trace amounts of fertilizer or pesticide residues might be found in the ground water at this site, or nitrate content might increase, provision is being made and space provided in the pumping station building for future installation of granular activated carbon filters and/or ion exchange units , which would remove such substances from the well water prior to its entering the storage reservoir. Two small chemical feed pumps (one is to be a spare) will be provided to provide continuous disinfection of the water pumped to the distribution. Chemical feed will be proportioned to demand. It is expected to use hypochlorite as the disinfecting agent and all requirements of the health authorities will be included in the plans and specifications. -3- HENDERSON AND BODWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS A small chemical feed pump is also to be provided to disinfect the well discharge to the reservoir . DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The distribution system would be constructed of PVC pipe , 6 inches in diameter and meeting the requirements of AWWA C-900 . About 10 6 inch gate valves and 9 fire hydrants would be installed. Arrangement is shown on Sketch #3 . DISINFECTION Both wells, the storage reservoir , the hydropneumatic tank and the entire distribution system are to be disinfected before being placed in operation, in full conformance with the requirements of the New York State Department of Bealth . PUMPING STATION BUILDING All pumping equipment and any treatment equipment needed would be housed in a small attractive brick and concrete block building. See attached Sketch #3 , which shows building floor plan, arrangement of equipment, etc. SITE The proposed site work includes grading of the site, access driveway and parking area, landscaping, and fencing around the storage reservoir and wells. The concept is shown on attached Sketch #2. AH/dm -4- APPENDIX "A" Tests of the Water Bearing Strata investi•4ations at the site are reperte� in the trio fin-'3 reports dated April 5 and April 15 , 1984 , attached hereto . Briefly, they indicata that the required sou-c_ of water supply can be obtained safely and that the cnlori3e ani nitrate content of the water will be acceptable and snould not require any special treatment process . Lowering of the water table at the wells will be minimal , a-:d the cone of influence created by the pumping operations will be contained entirely within the limits of the three acre site being reserved for water supply installations . HENDERSON AND BODWELL DATE : April 5 , 1984 PAGE : 1 of 2 FROM : J. MILLIKEN TO: !MEMO OF RECORD RE : SEACROFT, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK CC : A. HENDERSON, R. BODWELL, B. RIESS -------------------------------------------- On March 28 , 1984 , the well driller (Casola) installed a 4-inch well casing to 68 ft. and a 2-inch well with 2 ft . well point to 67 ft . The static water level measured was 27 . 5 ft. below grade or at approximately EL 7.0 . Since the county requires 40 ft . of water present in the well , the 67 ft. depth would be the approximate minimum depth of the well ; therefore, a pesticide sample was taken at this depth. Samples were also taken at 10 ft. intervals from 67 ft. to 37 ft. below grade to collect data on nitrate and iron levels present. On April 4 , 1984 , the well driller installed a 2-inch ell within t-he 4-inch well casing previously installed to 68 ft. The 2-inch well with 2 ft. well point was driven to a depth of 98 ft. Samples were taken at 5 ft. intervals from 98 ft. to 73 ft. again to collect data on nitrate and iron levels present. The wash from the 4-inch well casing was coarse to fine sand with trace amounts of gravel , and the driving of the 2-inch wells did not indicate any large clay or gravel layers. All samples were collected as the 2-inch wells were pulled back and the well was pumped off for 5 minutes at a rate of 10 gpm + prior to the taking of each sample. The wells were checked twice in the field for the chloride level present at the 67 ft. and 98 ft. depths. These results along with the nitrate and iron results which were tested by Henderson and Bodwell in the office are attached. The pesticide sample is being analyzed by New York Testing. Based on the attached test results, it appears the best depth for the well is between 83 ft. and 88 ft. depths. Additional testing will consist of setting the 4-inch casing previously installed to the desired depth and pumping it for 12 hours at a rate of 60 gpm. This rate is the approximate horly peak rate of the proposed project. Two 2-inch observation wells will also be installed at 1 ft . and 100 ft. distances from the test well in the direction of the existing homes. The well will be sampled both at the start of pumping -6- HENDERSON AND BODWELL and just prior to the termination of the pumping . Both the pump testing procedure and the type of testing to be done on the samples has been discussed and approved by Paul Ponturo of the Suffolk County Health Department. JM/dm -7- SEACROFT - CUTC8OGUE TEST WELL Static Water @ 27 . 5 Sample # Depth Chloride Nitrate Iron 1 371 - 6 . 0 0 2 471 - 4 . 5 0 3 571 - 7. 0 0 4 67 ' 22 . 5 7. 0 0 . 25 5 731 - 6 . 0 0. 10 6 781 - 6. 5 0.05 7 83 ' - 3. 5 0. 05 8 881 - 5.0 0. 05 9 939 - 7.0 0 10 98 ' 32 . 5 8. 0 0 . 10 -8- HENDERSON AND BODWELL DATE : April 16 , 1984 FROM: J. MILLIKEN PAGE : 1 of 1 TO: MEMO OF RECORD RE : SEACROFT CUTCHOGUE - TEST WELL CC: A. HENDERSON, R. BODWELL, B. RIESS ---------------------------------- The Seacroft Test Well was installed to a depth of 88 ft . with a 5 ft. well screen and 4-inch submersible pump. Additionally, 2 2-inch observation wells were also installed to a depth of 88 ft. located one foot from the 4-inch Test Well and 100 ft. from the 4-inch Test Well , both in the direction of the existing houses on Highland Drive . This work was done by the well driller ( Casola) under the direction of Henderson and Bodwell prior to the pumping test. On Friday, April 13 , 1984 , the 12 hour pumping test began at 7 :36 a.m. The static water level prior to pumping was 26 ft. 1-inch below grade at the observation well one foot away from the test well and 26 ft. 3 1/2 in. below grade at the observation well 100 feet away from the test Well . The draw down was measured immediately after pumping began and the water level at the one foot observation well dropped to 26 ft. 10 1/2 in. below grade where it remained throughout the course of the pumping test . The 100 ft. observation well experienced no draw down effect and the water level remained at 26 ft. 3 1/2 in. below grade for the entire pumping test. The recovery of the water level at the one foot observation well upon completion of pumping was immediate. It returned to 26 ft. 1-inch below grade as soon as the pump was shut down. Samples were taken at 8 :00a.m. and 7 :15 p.m. by our office, to be tested by New York Testing. Additionally, the Suffolk County Health Department took stamples at 8 : 30 a.m. , 10: 30 a.m. , and 6 :15 p.m. The pumping rate was checked several times during the day and twice by the county people and found to be between 57 and 60 9Pm- The chloride level was checked periodically and found to be 27 . 50 ppm throughout the day. The nitrate level was checked in our office and found to be 5. 5 ppm at the beginning of pumping and 5. 0 ppm just prior to shut down. The iron level was also checked in our office and found to be 0.05 at the beginning of pumping and just prior to shut down. JM/dm -9- APPENDIX "B" Water Analysis Report The quality of the proposed source appears satisfactory for potable use, needing only disinfection by chlorination. It is possible, though we believe not likely, that nitrates may in the future increase to more than the allowable 10 mg per liter as nitrogen, or that objectionable amounts of pesticide or fertilizer residues might be found. Space is being provided in the pumping station building for the installation of treatment equipment should the need arise. -10- La: tic, nDate May g, 1984 =-'EN4'y-'ORK TESTING LABORATORIES L'\ C. t CALL BOX 1021 75 URBAN AVENUE WESTBURY L.1.,N Y 11590 . (516) 134-7770 (212; 297-14L49 REPORT OF TESTS Client — 84 -72334 ( B ) - Henderson b Bodwell Material — Two ( 2 ) Water Samples Client's Order No. — Pending Identification — As below Submitted for — Chemical Analysis Sample Identification Sea Croft , Start of Pumping 4/13/84 Sea Croft , End of Pumping of (Results , see following pages . ) Report prepared by : Remo Gigante , Laboratory We certify that this report is a true Director report of results obtained from our tests of this material . Respectfully submitted , NEW YORK TESTING LABORATORIES , INC . To : G . J H vitz , Chie Officer Henderson 5 Bodwell 120 Express Street Plainview , N . Y . 11803 Att : Mr. J . Milliken gd Report on aarrpie by client applies onts to sample Report or samples by us appl,n on!s to 10- ti; KC Iniorma!u,r con:a ncc nerctn n no, to oc used for reprooucuon except os specra. perrr, ssto' Sample, rr:—,e: lot thirty da,. maxtrnum afte' dare o` report unless specifically requested otherwise M [lien; Tn• 1,,� o' ,nc fieri, \oti Trsttng Laboratories In, -uh respite! ro the ser.rea charged for hereto shalt to no event ucccC the am o.,n. or the N 10C IMoKf -11- NE"W YORK TESTING LA BOR ATORI1'S, INC. Page 2 . Lab No 84 - 72334 VOLATILE COMPOUNDS: Sample Number: Sea Croft , Start of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Sample Size: 1 . 0 ml . Internal Std. Concs. Bromochloromethane 60 (total ngs. ) 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane Surrogate Std. Concs. Deuterochloroform 45 (total ngs. ) Deuterobenzene 42 Deuterotoluene 30 Method Detection Method CAS Limit Found Parameter No. No. (ppb)* (ppb) Acrolein 624 107-02-8 100 ND Acrylonitrile 624 107-13-1 100 ND Benzene 624 71-43-2 10 ND Bromodichloromethane 624 75-27-4 10 ND Bromoform 624 75-25-2 10 ND Bromomethane 624 74-83-9 10 ND Carbon Tetrachloride 624 56-23-5 10 ND Chlorobenzene 624 108-90-7 10 ND Chlorodibromomethane 624 124-48-1 10 ND Chloroethane 624 75-00-3 10 ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 624 110-75-8 10 ND Chloroform 624 67-66-3 10 ND Chloromethane 624 74-87-3 10 ND 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 624 95-50-1 10 ND 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 624 541-73-1 10 ND 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene 624 106-46-7 10 ND ND = None Detected < = Less than *EPA published method detection limit -12- Y )IZh LAM )RATOIiIES. INC. Page 3 . Lab No 84 - 723: VOLATILE COMPOUNDS - cont'd. Sample Nu*er: Sea Croft , Start of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Method Detection Method CAS Limit Found Parameter No . No. (ppb)* (ppb) Dichlorodifluoromethane 624 75-71-8 10 NC l ,l-Dichlo methane 624 75-34-3 10 NO 1-2-Dichloroethane 624 107-06-2 10 ND 1 ,1-Dichloroethylene 624 75-35-4 10 ND Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 624 156-60-5 10 NO 1 ,2-DichIoropropane 624 78-87-5 10 ND 1 ,3-Dichloropropene 624 10061-02-6 10 ND Ethylbenzene 624 100-41-4 10 ND Methylene Chloride 624 75-09-2 10 NO 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 624 79-34-5 10 ND Tetrachloroethylene 624 127-18-4 10 ND Toluene 624 108-88-3 10 NO 1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane 624 71-55-6 10 ND 1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane 624 79-00-5 10 ND Trichloroethylene 624 79-01-6 10 NO Trichlorofluoromethane 624 75-69-4 10 ND Vinyl Chloride 624 75-01-4 10 NO ND = None Detected < = Less than * EPA published method detection limit -13- : ENV YORK TE�--;': ATNG LABORATORIES, INC. Page 4 • Lab No 84 - 7 PESTICIDE COMPOUNDS: Sample Number: Seacroft , Start of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Sample Size: 600 ml . Extract Volume 1 . 0 ml Volume Inj . 5 ,ul Limit Found Parameter Method No. CAS ( p p b ) ( p p b ) Aldrin 608, 625 309-00-2 1.0 ND c& -BHC 608, 625 319-84-6 1.0 ND B-BHC 608, 625 319-85-7 1.0 ND 6 -BHC 608, 625 319-86-8 1.0 ND -f -BHC 608, 625 58-89-9 1.0 ND Chlordane 608, 625 57-74-9 1.0 ND Dieldrin 608, 625 60-57-1 1.0 ND a-Endosulfan 608, 625 959-98-8 1.0 ND B-Endosulfan 608, 625 33213-65-9 1.0 ND Endosulfan sulfate 608, 625 1031-07-08 1.0 ND Endrin 608, 625 72-20-8 1.0 ND Endrin aldehyde 608, 625 7421-93-4 1.0 ND Heptachlor 608, 625 76-44-8 1.0 ND Heptachlor Epoxide 608, 625 1024-57-3 1.0 ND 4,4'-DDT 608, 625 50 29-3 1,0 ND 4,4'-DDE 608, 625 72-55-9 1,0 ND 4,4'-DDD 608, 625 72-54-8 1.0 ND PCB 1016 608, 625 12674-11 -2 1.0 ND PCB 1221 608, 625 11104-28-2 1.0 ND PCB 1232 608, 625 11141-16-5 1.0 ND PCB 1242 608, 625 53469-21-9 1.0 ND PCB 1248 608, 625 12672-29-6 1.0 ND PCB 1254 608, 625 11097-69-1 1 .0 ND PCB 1260 608, 625 11096-82-5 1 .0 ND Toxaphene 608, 625 8001 -35-2 1 .0 ND 2 , 4 - 0 608,62L -- 1 .0 NCS 2 ,4 ,5-TF 608,625 -- i 0 tl,` NL' = Nd. te,,: -14- NE"W YORK TOS;TING LABORATORIES, INC. Page 5 . Lab No. 84 - 7233, VOLATILE COMPOUNDS: Sample Number: Sea Croft , End of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Sample Size: 1 . 0 ml . Internal Std. Concs . Bromochloromethane 60 (total ngs. ) 2-Bromo-l-chloropropane bu Surrogate Std. Concs. Deuterochloroforr, 45 (total ngs. ) Deuterobenzene 42 Deuterotoluene 30 Method Detection Method CAS Limit Found Parameter No. No. (ppb)* (Ppb) Acrolein 624 107-02-8 100 ND Acrylonitrile 624 107-13-1. 100 ND Benzene 624 71-43-2 10 ND Bromodichlo romethane 624 75-27-4 10 ND Bromoform 624 75-25-2 10 ND Bromomethane 624 74-83-9 10 ND Carbon Tetrachloride 624 56-23-5 10 ND Chlorobenzene 624 108-90-7 10 ND Chlorodibromomethane 624 124-48-1 10 ND Chloroethane 624 75-00-3 10 ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 624 110-75-8 10 ND Chlorofora- 624 67-66-3 10 ND Chloromethane 624 74-87-3 10 ND 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 624 95-50-1 10 ND 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 624 541-73-1 10 ND 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene 624 106-46-7 10 ND ND = None Detected < = Less than *EPA published method detection lira . -15- N ( )lll� '1'l•;�'1'I1( : 1 ,�11i( ►1ZATOR I );ti, INC'. Page 6 , Lab No 84 -72331 VOLATILE COMPOUNDS - cont 'd . Sample Number: Sea Croft , End of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Method Detection Method CAS Limit Found Parameter No No (ppb)* (ppb) Dichlorodifluoromethane 624 75-71-8 10 ND l ,l-Dichloroethane 624 75-34-3 10 NO 1-2-DichIoroethane 624 107-06-2 10 NO 1 ,1-Dichloroethylene 624 75-35-4 10 NO Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 624 156-60-5 10 ND 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 624 78-87-5 10 ND 1 ,3-Dichloropropene 624 10061-02-6 10 ND Ethylbenzene 624 100-41-4 10 ND Methylene Chloride 624 75-09-2 10 ND 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 624 79-34-5 10 ND Tetrachloroethylene 624 127-18-4 10 NO Toluene 624 108-88-3 10 ND 1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane 624 71-55-6 10 ND 1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane 624 79-00-5 10 NO Trichloroethylene 624 79-01-6 10 NO Trichlorofluoromethane 624 75-69-4 10 ND Vinyl Chloride 624 75-01-4 10 NO ND = None Detected < = Less than * EPA published method detection limit -1E- Y()RbI TESTING LAI30RA'l'URIES, INC. Page 7 . Lab No 84 - 7213Gf PESTICIDE COMPOUNDS: Sample Number: Sea Croft , End of Pumping 4/ 13/84 Sample Size: 800 ml . Extract Volume 1 . 0 ml Volume Inj . Limit Found Parameter Method No. CAS ti ( ppb ) ( ppb ) Aldrin 608, 625 309-00-2 1.0 NO a-BHC 608, 625 319-84-6 1.0 NO B-BHC 608, 625 319-85-7 1.0 NO 6 -BHC 608, 625 319-86-8 1.0 NO Y-BHC 608, 625 58-89-9 1.0 NO Chlordane 608, 625 57-74-9 1.0 NO Dieldrin 608, 625 60-57-1 1.0 NO a-Endosulfan 608,' 625 959-98-8 1.0 NO B-Endosulfan 608, 625 33213-65-9 1.0 NO Endosulfan sulfate 608, 625 1031-07-08 1.0 NO Endrin 608, 625 72-20-8 1,0 NO Endrin aldehyde 608, 625 7421-93-4 1,0 NO Heptachlor 608, 625 76-44-8 1.0 NO Heptachlor Epoxide 608, 625 1024-57-3 1.0 NO 4 ,4 '-DDT 608, 625 50 29-3 1,0 NO 4 ,4'-DDE 608, 625 72-55-9 1.0 NO 4 ,4 ' -DDD 608, 625 72-54-8 1.0 NO PCB 1016 608, 625 12674-11-2 1.0 NO PCB 1221 608, 625 11104-28-2 1.0 NO PCB 1232 608, 625 11141-16-5 1.0 ND PCB 1242 608, 625 53469-21-9 1.0 NO PCB 1248 608, 625 12672-29-6 1.0 NO PCB 1254 608, 625 11097-69-1 1 .0 ND PCB 1260 608, 625 11096-82-5 1 .0 ND Toxaphen-& 608, 625 8001 -35-2 1 .0 N1' 4 - 608,62 -- 1 .0 2 ,4 •- - + r 60 .,62- -- 1 C oil -17- N E AV YO RK '!'EKTING LABORATORIES, INC. Page g , Lab No 84 -7233z RESULTS - cont ' d . Sample Identification Sea Croft Sea Croft 4/ 13/84 4/ 13/84 Start of End of Pumping Pumping PH @ 20°C . 6 . 50 6 . 07 Colot Pt/Co Unit < 10 < 10 Turbidity ( NTU ) 0 . 3 0 . 3 Taste Unobjectionable Unobjectionable Odor (TON ) < 1 < 1 Results in mg/ l : Nitrate 8 .48 9 . 29 Ammonia 0 . 22 0. 31 Sulfate 90 85 Chloride 24 24 Detergents 0 . 27 0. 29 Total Hardness as CaCO3 161 162 Calcium as CaCO3 99 96 Sodium 9 . 42 10. 21 Iron 0 . 078 0. 052 Manganese < 0 . 006 < 0. 006 Copper 0 .013 0. 014 Zinc 0 . 158 0. 043 Magnesium 14 . 97 16 . 24 Total Coliform , MPN/ 100 ml - < 2 < = Less than -18- �.].FA C-R 0 IF C4—AZ L L C9 s � O A &4 �g OCGord.� 1ruQ���rI�Qr .1. S C S►•1 S Qas.,( .��'_`-`_ I h r. 3 �r I I �►r ' e mea. . . . . . . . . _<< _<o. , _.— _ ro-3 free ammonia at . . . . . . . .c O,o 4 (1 , p� nitrate . . . . . � . . . . . . . . R . t -- -7.. 5PH - specific conductivity chloride . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sulfate - iron 40. 1 <O. 1 manganese • . . . • . . 0000 . . <p, o� •cD��S _ �.C,� �' -- - copper _eOiL – zinc 9 . . • . . . . . . . • • . 4 4 . 9 e- O . AJ _< o� <_ O. sodium . . • • 4 • 4 • • • • • • • • • � _ 1, _ _ — raiA L NAQD,yVSs qn _LO — T�ALI',AL.,,�. vinyl chloride . . . . . . . . c 3 _ ��_ metbylene chloride 0 0 0 0 _< Z – <-L I lot _ bromochloromethane -L- 1 , 1 1 , 1 dichloroethane . . . . t Z. - c Z - trans dichloroethylene .4 -1- -.• < Z chloroform . . . . . . . . . . . . - Z <Z._ ---e_ 1 ,2 dichloroethane • 4 • • w . 1 , 1 , 1 trichloroethane . Z < 'L < Z carbon tetrachloride 0 • < L 1 bromo 2 chloroethane 1 ,2 dichloropropane • 99 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethylene 7:t7—Z chlorodibromomethane ��- 1 , 2 dibromoethane . . . . . .c L c 2 < - 2 bromo 1 chloropropane L Z bromoform • 999 . 90 . 0 . . . • c Z tetrachloroethylene 9 . 9 cis dichloroethylene . 9 < Z - freon * A 0 • • • • 9 • . 0 . 999 <_�� dibrom, .iethane . 0 4 9 0 • . • _—< 2 -c1 , 1 dicaloroethylene . . < 2- < Z. Z, , , bromodichloromethane . . -< Z ��_ _ _ 2 ,3 dichloropropene . . 9 .4 7L cis dichloropropene . . . a 2 trans dichloropropene 0 :L_ - 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethane . -- -L - _< L _c Z. benzene _ — toluene — chlorobenzene . . . . . . . . . -e- t - Lxylee.thylbenzene . . • • 9 . . . . . Z j– _< de- xylenes nes . . . • . 4 . 9 . 9999 . • e- -4, < 3 bromobenzene . 9 . • • 9 9 • • . .< K�I chlorotoluenes . . . . . . . . J5_ e- &_ ,L _ 1 , 3 , 5 trimethylbenzene 1 , 2 ,4 trimethylbenzene m, p dichlorobenzene o dichlorobenzene • . . 9 0 < q p diethylbenzene . . . . . . - 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 tetrmethylbenze 4_ 1 , 2 , 4 trichlorobenzene <– 1 , 2 , 3 trichlorobenzene _ 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrchlor. ethar_e Z.. 2 1 -7- 1 , 2 , 2 ,3 1 , 2 , 2 ,3 tetrchlorpropan 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrchlorpropan c 2 s 1 , 2 , 3 trichloropropane _ � — aldicarb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . –_�_ _< — carbofuran oxamyl o • • • 4 . 9 . 49 • • 9 . • • carbaryl methomyl7 —A-4— C AA-4-- i`rs�•Ts cs�-� JN�l3Lf— Hn�/��izEp Mc2F �rl4N _1 RIl_ APPENDIX "C" Sketches of Proposed Installations L Vv 1 1 ^/N ..-.,...•.. I .JA b L S` FYd K �r fWai"I yM3 tihil—par f I AJ /`�C�` HarinLl/LLt/Q v�Lc.� ' av�� ��.a�doJ� � /c�fSc�(11 attIL F-votv J-� oc1 OSI e i _ onlr 27 a lflo-1 02 Teubyt7 1/c7c?C� c7�U�5 5,�1-- 70 /loos go NAOL --f- - : 5nNZ Ci KO7 /tiB.c raj� ' .1 I i GvTt/arof Amwn bpi ,t�vl•�r vfr o-*r L o 2. 9,9 „ •_ rll � ti _ 1 .�0 � IRFQTr1F'tir� 1 �DIIA � S"t / Po n PI y4 Sri II 60 , Ir � y412 �/ ( /p7"j- ./NK� �J �C /00/ 000 \ PFAICCIV4 j a (r{EjFA,ioOIL 1 s 28,0/0Ry Z� � v � S/f-iayFl4 Aox �� eG)i flilji OI Pd., STOrr,Oc/ q,,,o /OWI✓ Or cS'ONTI�OC/7 PFSF/?���t Feu✓0�7�oV CRia�fFeeTi,v�� —A/v . 7o Qf �i �r�O�GVF CRe.� vo .S'c.nF�►ct' `—� �R�94r tr/7� -7v �7�tr�rdsr7 /scL �474rR JLInPC�j� L✓EL( S . FO NO/.vS , q vD .rho/ter [S tecivo T?FATHEV7 PLiy�✓ 1,+✓oy r-/te*r rvtcts Felt is rr..•�...�► T 4Nn Py.s� Oi»wacf oj- /oo � q7 /r / °l'�cePl. s7w7ioAJ 41?OZRAolC&-HE�/T. EJ.IDErtSoU q,up I3G DW CL L CG A2 Iry11TiA/G Ff/t� 1-2C' FxPrt Fs S 5-74RFf r r'c �lti ��Ew� / rgc3 2l' %) 1 I a+ .t"f✓ MI•rI n 9......., : 4✓ ✓II l Tir=..0 r rt Co SIAL ��rI R.M•.w� ' � I ' � 0 lX PrIM/ I . O...' Y , 1 fra Lowl- 1 V 001'r i'.wr 1 «r —7i► •W r.ta.: 0 M . frfr r� 70 vAf op Sow yoL o rYF'Icp l wcl.L tui-r'71t 'R f-�k-1,1DFnSeJV qNb 13oaWFLV 1 �'bL/Sb�Tlrl/� F�.V4i�/EE/��S rAi r a - r.r. wI1,J , wfq Grfou u h !;t o v• 3 y r'cv IoIPe T five 1I 1 frJ'firrr 2-J"ye8 ' I SAplot f.v9 Fec;r - I � e -& r •• • .• • - 64 -- - - & •. r -. - _--. - r - - .r - r 1 J I I Z ♦I � I I ti rvJe G •a•V ` *40014 1 h 1� I � '�p:1 Ae I�e l i.a .. r.. N � ' • 0lb' I y �• I C U ,. SIfl of t' � � � I Jsr-fa9� Ire t �e 'W I ac Q•u.► I Y • .I I ��✓ K '. . CL 40 JA V I I !18jaj doom Neo. - �f Roo. /La/ur • ' '7 C' 1 41/Mr /.vc•..r 'z A ; 2140 �a"o c✓ ,e'.r.� >/�/PE 'Tna•Nril off✓ 101.O ��N ramI' Ge 4• —••- e.• R�,Ie ww•w WA SrSxN 9rAnJ B►'ar1• 1 e / o • 1117 1 r — ♦ - - � .. — r r r - -. r s• �r .—r r- -. r .r —r — rte— r- �, — ' — �— . CL. '►r .. n.,r� •Y. So, CL w e FirwAf GAC rj,�r�r GAC. t � Fia+rn Fit�e•t • (/I•/Pl1Y1Af0, (1/ /r�OVI.III� �0. e a A O R C'�L w V. 3.r• O h FIL� ' • r ---cr a �'EA�AT CuTcl40Gvr OWO or Jot/ rye 1. v ties •Nry varve . •�VM P S7AT1O.v Pt��/ - - ��/.ID F/t Je d aui 1,3on�✓ot � . neSS J rytFcr �Lh�c�tltJ+[.N,: `iBn3 2z'-o"� I p 7/r1y8'! Q•C9�G ' -23- SN�-r�•M 3 • J" ' � . ' 1 i i ' . . . : ``' . il I + : . 1 .•_ ! It ! i , : i i 1 . , . 1 ' . � " i 1 .: ' . -� •_ .I ^- • ,- �- ii � i�": ': I i r' .. 1 . '�- 'f'. 't 'It �' I t ; . I r -1 l: , ' .' �---'8� . .i.: i I. _ I• ii �l ...-.A: Liit. I 1:. :��1,i1-- 1 '1`y .' ._—:•. ( � . . i ' , UM/'-� 1__ it ' '--`'.1:. 1.. � .f•I� h• -� i- •�1 r� + , i�.: � :._. 1 == j.;, 1' ._;. (A ts I! 414L, �+°;(- I- I'..�i , -1-r}j-t_ _f r:,.t• a;t .=�i�t1 t ,j�l .!.! i :_— : `I -`-} f:- -.:i.:�-�' t- "-- �� .-:�_ •TfQ�• .�_, _ l,�' -�--} - --t� •+�- •�-r- -- -_-'-- , t vrc 'ti � --�-- i =: :t' •-----. - _ eC 1 ,_.t� ! o h: T�'- t .'- r� f:i'_r_. ( . ,'�. S .t .r `_,1.t 1- - •s —•76 s•r A/r t_► - (__ I[: �--' F-LLji: 1, �� Ab _ lf_ /t Q^ plol:qL i _ 1 I{� ;P4M . rpt �I1 i tt; : t Tv [ :.,_ : `. .t i i cr .V 1 I --, r ' r - r•1 �'_ 44t_ '.1�..�:_. 1-r .I1-L _- t _ j +.. 1. .., : .- . .._.: -- • } •., f�t:. �j��_�,+'I�--I"lx- '1 tt Wit._ �14 I;: i 1- I- 1 �� `,•-!I� � � }�•�� 1.� - I�ii1: .-I i .�44. I' .: 1 S-zKh ;;- -_�;} ,__ -;I}_ I�•' ,-- t ilf-- I}� Ft1,.. �= r •1 I t '1; 1 i -•-` 1 ` -tl:. i I •+ 1 . .. , ,y so C ' J 1 /.a-t r -� 1-' 1: � ------y_` -.__rte •..�: r- _ ; .4... I ' .7, Itl�f � -f'= �� . T __ ` •�_-t- :��S�M .J .1-, 1 .. F 1-i- :.i_`-•-f f -Y - _ I .1 �_ r�+�F!k- ��` r:'y 1_ r -Q 1 . _ __... +•1. " 14, 'T; 1 ri ( I' -. . . . •�� IVt2 I ..I. �r.l �+. 1-' �T. ,' � �-:'�►} �Y-1 - �h l��_ 1 _1�ai� a l� - - 1f• r _ r ! I" I �1_ _� ' s�_� I ...__ �_ ' .:iT...i:i;_ i.i__ � i �-t'- ♦ �-.a-. •'j. .1�.. :,-, '•_• _tC- .,.a i +._ i�_:_ _ .1__�_. tT .- V r .. la �r.1F_1•f- t -, _t, 'i�J��t r r: G4 :- t r1- r t rr I I If I- ' ►1 ` _rN .VIII + (. - - • Z AI& /yam y 841 C2.a.N Fu MP syeLr CT iur�e N TCI -PI RW PUMP is .y01 Nos �_8. z l3-f Z X3x 6J8 rsRESJvRw- ! J7 c 'ran-rr it 5-wv its ,f'nv> ilotn /)yyIvr-) 3L— TZn r-tt I-o yr !ry_,tTlr" o r.+a A.0. ►2 lrApa l4 grs Vf'0 o w yon ►< P/"I ARrd s'7'GP� we rU s f7 .1 f tc Pow,/+ /f 7 G _�_. _ _ C t_L t? %G N CA PAC '� y _ Tr rQ'J J_r'_ k /'� pr HAAVO IL-44& s Ts 4100 CPr-1 a' D1�J�vat-���� �r4 Vrnr� Crv7 3Guo RPr-t� 30 Imo • &ENDanSoy nib 1300 wk L L ro ,vs(.O,-,L-t cAve u ;/N41x(?S APPENDIX D GROUNDWATER/NITROGEN BUDGET ANALYSIS ' ' DEVELOPED FROM CORNELL WHLRAS STUDY By INC. ENVlRONMENT*L SCIENCES DEPAF }MENT FROJECT:HAMLET AT CU [CHUGUE DATE:6-20-89 ' # UNITS: 160 DATA PROCESSED: RESULTS lO FOLLOW 6. 4244 ma/I TUFAL NlT�uG[N [ lUN ***ME6wm6E FILE*** B1 : 2. 117073E+07 Cl : 1 . 396131E+o7 D1 : 87boVU0 E1 : 4%z45.. F1 : 1408 P: 143 TN: 2615 TWM: 1 .84631E+v6 TNM: 1 . 18o143E+Q9 ***D*TA SUMM*R /*,* PRECIPITATION; in/vr: 46 PERMEA6LE *CREE: 33. 9 IMPERMEABLE ACRES: 12. 26 DOMESTIC WATER. opdu: 15w ' IRRIGATED OuRES: 3Z. 56 TURF ACRES: 22 DENSITY . PER UNIT: 1 . 33 UNI / NUMPEH VHRlH} ION: DATA P%LELSEL; RE±u/ > s }U FUliOw # UNITS: 156 6. 367731 mo/l= TOTAL NITH06LA [UH, LN } F"T1U|1 UNIT NUMBER VmRlA [ION: DATA P& jLEw%b: wEhULTS |U bULLuW # UNITS: 152 6. 35o711 mo/ l= TDl *L NlTRuwFN [OALWlh~~i1/ /N DEVEL0Fbu FROM LUPNELL WALK*5 S } UM B/ GREEKU`iH}`|-PEVEA"Eh lNL. ENVIRONMENTAL 5[IENCES uEvHH [MENT PROJELT :HmMLET AT LUTCHOGUE D*TE: JUNE 1989 # UNIT±: 138 DAlA PRUCE55EQ: RESULTS TO FOLLOW 6. 4o1836 mo/l= TOTAL N [TP06EN %NGEN [RH [IUN ***ME6b+x 'U FILE*** B1 : 2. 281942E+07 Cl : 1 . 0q7066E+0'7 D1: 7555500 E1: 48o�45.2 F1 : 14o8 P: 143 TN: 2468. 7 TWM: 1 . 749159E+08 TNM: 1 . 119783E+09 ***DATA SUMMHir*** PRECIPITATION; in/vr: 46 PEHMEAHLE ACRES: 36. 54 lKpERMEABLE HCRES: 9.62 DOMLETI[ WATEF . opdu: 150 IRRIGATED ALRES: Z2. 56 TURF ALREQ: 22 DENSITY. PER UNIT: 1 . 33 APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE ,2. OFFICE .DFn T RVISOR TOWN.,I]F -Sy OOT . LD •.I ✓j 1 FRANCIS J.MURPHY TELEPHONE SUPERVISOR (516) 765-1800 MAIN ROAD (516) 765-1939 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE for HAMLET MEETINGS JANUARY & FEBRUARY, 1986 -2- List of new districts A-C - Agricultural -Conservation District (Two acre minimum) R-80 - Residential Low Density District (Two acre minimum) R-40 - Residential Low Density District (One acre minimum) R-120 - Residential Low Density District (Three acre minimum) R-200 - Residential Low Density District (Five acre minimum) R-400 - Residential Low Density District (Ten acre minimum) HD - Hamlet Density Residential District RR - Resort Residential District RO - Residential Office District HB - Hamlet Business District LB - Limited Business District B-1 - General Business District M-Rec - Marine Recreation District MB - Marine Business District LIO - Light Industrial Park/Office Park District LI - Light Industrial District -3- Purpose of each District Agricultural-Conservation A-C District Low Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200, R-400 Districts Section 100-30. Purpose. The purpose of the Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) District and the Low Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts is to reasonably control , and to the extent possible prevent , the unnecessary loss of those currently open lands within the Town containing large and contiguous areas of prime agricultural soils which are the basis for a significant portion of the Town' s economy and those areas with sensitive environmental features including aquifer recharge areas and bluffs. In addition these areas provide the open rural environ- ment so highly valued by year-round residents and those persons who support the Town of Southold' s recreation, resort and second home economy. The economic , social and aesthetic benefits which can be obtained for all citizens by limiting loss of such areas are well documented, and have inspired a host of governmental programs designed, with varying degrees of success, to achieve this result . For its part , the Town is expending large sums of money to protect existing farm acreage. At the same time, the Town has an obligation to exercise its authority to reasonably regulate the subdivision and development of this land to further the same purposes, while honoring the legitimate interests of farmers and other farmland owners. Low Density Residential R-40 District Section 100-30A. Purpose. The purpose of the Low Density Residential R-40 District is to provide areas for residential development where existing neighbor- hood characteristics, water supply and environmental conditions permit full development densities of approximately one dwelling per acre and where open space and agricultural preservation are not predominate objectives. Hamlet Density Residential (HD) District Section 100-40. Purpose The purpose of the Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District is to (1) permit a mix of housing types and level of residential density appropriate to the areas in and around the major hamlet centers , particularly Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the Village of Greenport and (2) to promote the provision of lower cost housing in these hamlet and village areas, where provision of utilities exists or may be possible and desirable and where Public facilities and commercial activities are available. -4- • Resort Residential (RR) District Section 100-50. Purpose. The purpose of the Resort Residential (RR) District is to provide opportunity for waterfront resort development in what are essential low density residential areas at a density and character consistent with surrounding uses. Residential Office (RO) District Section 100-70. Purpose. To provide a transition area between business areas and low density residential development along major roads which will provide oppor- tunity for limited nonresidential uses in essentially residential areas. Limited Business (LB) District Section 100-80. Purpose. The purpose of the Limited Business District (LB) is to provide an opportunity to accomodate limited business activity along high- way corridors, but in areas outside the hamlet central business areas that is consistent with the rural and historic character of surrounding areas and uses. Emphasis will be placed on review of design features so that existing and future uses will not detract from surrounding uses. The additional uses must generate low amounts of traffic and be designed to protect the residential and rural character of the area. Hamlet Business (HB) District Section 100-90. Purpose. The purpose of the Hamlet Business (HB) District is to provide for business development in the hamlet central business area, including retail , office and service uses, public and semi-public uses, as well as hotel and motel and multi-family residential development that will support and enhance the retail development and provide a focus for the hamlet area. General Business (B-1) District Section 100-100. Purpose. The purpose of the General Business/Highway Business (B-1) District is to provide for retail and wholesale commercial development and limited office and industrial development outside of the hamlet central business areas, generally along major highways. It is designated to accomodate uses that benefit from large parcels of land, and that may involve characteristics such as heavy trucking and noise. -5- Marine Recreation (M-Rec) District Section 100-110. Purpose. To permit and encourage water-related recreational uses on waterfront properties that are located on inland waterways or creeks. Marine Business (MB) District Section 100-120. Purpose. To provide a waterfront location for a range of water dependent and water related uses which are those uses which require or benefit from direct access to, or location in marine or tidal waters. Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park (LIO) District Section 100-130. Purpose. The purpose of the Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park (LIO) District is to provide opportunity for the location of business and professional offices, research facilities, industrial uses and similar activities in an open , campus-like setting in areas which are not appropriate for commercial activity or low density residential development. In this area such uses can be established in an attractive environment and serve both as a means of preserving the open qualities of an area and providing an area, adjacent to hamlet areas where such uses can be appropriately developed with suitable protection for ground and water surface waters. All uses must conform to Suffolk County Health Department standards. Light Industrial (LI ) District Section 100-140. Purpose. The purpose of the Light Office (LI ) District is to provide an opportunity for business and industrial uses on smaller lots than would be appropriate for the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District . The pages to follow are copies of the Table entitled. Summary of Permitted Uses by_Zoning District SUMMARY OF PERMITTED USES BY ZONING DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 80 120 200 400 HD A B RO LB 11B B-1 MRec MB 1,10 LI wilding, electrical or plumbing contractor's business or yard P P P uildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, School Districts, Park Districts and Fire Districts P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P us or train station P P Lntral power and heating plants A A A emetery SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 'hildren's recreation camp SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE old storage plant P 'ollege SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 'onference facilities SE SE SE SE jrinking establishment, not including nightclub or other such entertalranent establishment SE SE SE SE iarm labor camp SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE .erry terminal SE Fish market, Including wholesale and retail sale of finfish And or shellfish SE SE SE Fish proccssli.g plant SE Food proce"I ng and packaging, except fish processing P P P Fraternal or social office or meeting hall (nonprofit) SE SE Fully el.cioscd storage building A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A SUMMARY OF PERMITTED USES BY ZONING DISTRICT P - PERMITTED SE - SPECIAL EXCEPTION (by Planning Board) SE* - SPECIAL EXCEPTION (by Town Board) A - ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 80 120 200 400 FID A B RO LB IIB B-1 MRec MB 1.10 LI Accessory apartment In existing one-family detached dwelling SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Agriculture (including accessory buildings) P P P P P P P P P P P P Airport, Basic Utility Stage II SE Antique shop, auction gallery, arts and crafts shop and workshop SE P P Apartment over store SE Auditorium, meeting hall P P Automobile laundry SE Bakeshop P P Bank P P Beach club or swim club SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE P P Bed and breakfast SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Boarding house, tourist house SE P P Boat and marine engine repair and sales P SE SE Boat docking facilities for charter boats, sightseeing boats and/or fishing vessels P Boat dock for personal, noncommercial use A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Boatyard, Including boat sales and rentals P SE SE SUMMARY OF PERMITTED USES BY ZONING DISTRICT . RESIDDITIAL COMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 BO 120 200 400 IID A B RO LB IIB B-1 MRec MB LIO Ll Motor vehicle, mobile home sales room or outdoor SE sales 1,,t including rental of equipment Multiple dwelling unit, three or more families SE SE SE SE Nursery scLool SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Nursing Lume, proprietary rest home SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Office: business and professional SE SE P P P P One-family detached dwelling P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Open storage pursuant to §100-101C (4) A A A Personal service shop: barbershop, beauty parlor, P P professlunal studio, travel agency Philanthropic, eleemosynary or religious Institutions SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Place of worship, including parish house SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Printing or publishing plant Private garage or private off-street parking and loading A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Private swimming pool A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Private tennis court A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Public ydiages SE SE Public utility structure or rights-of-way structures or other necessary installations SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SUMMARY OF PERMITTED USES BY ZONING DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL C014MERCIAL INDUSTRIAL R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 80 120 200 400 HD A B RO LB HB B-1 MRec MB LIO LI Funeral home SE SE P Garden houses, greenhouses, tool house pursuant to 5100-31C A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Gasoline service station, partial self service SE Gasoline service station with minor indoor rcpalr facility SE Greenhouse, plant nursery pursuant to §100-31A P P P P P P P P P P P P P Home occupation, including home professional office A A A A A A A A A A A A Iluspital SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE 11ote1, motel, resort SE SE SE SE SE SE Hotel, motel, transient SE SE SE SE SE SE Inservice training facilities for employees A Laundromat P P Laundry plant, dry cleaning plant SE SE SE Library, museum, art gallery SE SE SE P SE Light Industrial uses SE SE Maintenance and utility shops A A Mariculture/aquaculture business P Marina A SE P P Membership club, country club, golf club or golf course public, tennis club (nonprofit) SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Hubile home or house trailer (seasonal) SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SE* SL" SUMMARY OF PERMITTED USES BY ZONING DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDIISTRIAI. R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 80 120 200 400 HD A B RO LB IIB B-1 MRec MB 1.10 111 RecreaLiur facility, fully enclosed, commercial SE Retreat:_; facility for use of employees A Repair garage SE Repdir shop for household, business, or personal appliances P P Research design or development laboratory SE SE SE Restaurant, drive-in, curb service or fast food SE Restaurant (except drive-in) A SE SE SE P P SE SE SE SE Retail sale or rental of fishing, driving or balhit.g supplies or equipment SE SE Retail bhop or store (other than those listed heruln) P P Roadside farm stand for sale at retail for farm pruducts grown on the premises P P P P P P P P P P P P Sanildry facilities and laundry facilities A A A Sauerkraut manufacturing plant SE St: School, elementary or high, private SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Ship's loft or chandlery SE SE Shop for custom work and for making articles to be sold at retail on the premises SE P P Sikps A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Stable or riding academy SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SUMMARY OF PERM177EDUSES BY ZONING DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL C0h21EPCIAL INDUSTRIAL R- R- R- R- R- RR- RR- A-C 40 80 120 200 400 IID A B RO LB 11B B-I MRec MB 1,10 LI Storage of boat or trailer owned or used by occupant for personal use A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage yard SE SE Tclept,.ne exchange P P P Theater or cinema, other than outdoor P P Tourist camp SE* SE* SE* Townhouse SE SE SE SE Transportation service, private SE SE SE Truck or bus terminal r ` SE SE Two-family detached dwelling SE SE SE SE SE SE P SE SE SE SE P SE Veterinarian and/or animal hospital SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Warehouse or storage building P P P Wholesale business, including lunber and other building products, retail and wholesale boats _i P P p Wholesale/retail beverage distribution P Wholesale/retail nursery and/or sale of plants SE P Wineries for the production and retail sale of wine from grapes grown on premises and/or in Town of Southold SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Yacht club SE SE P P APPENDIX F TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ADDENDUM II TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: NOC R0, LTD. MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK PREPARED BY: GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. 325 WEST MAIN STREET BABYLON, NEW YORK 11702 OCTOBER 1988 TABLE OF COETENrS Page Table of Contents................... ..................................... i List of Figures............... ...................................... .... . List of Tables......... .... ............... ..... ..... .............. ..... .. INTRODUCTION. ...................................................... ...... 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................... 3 o Roadways................ ........................................• 3 o Land Use. .......................................................• 4 o Traffic Volumes.................................................. 4 STUDY PROCEDURE................ .:........... ........................ ..... 5 o Sight Distance. ......................... ......................... 5 STUDY FACTORS......................... .... ............................... 8 o Trip Generation.................................................. 8' o Trip Distribution and Assignment. ................................ 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS........................................................ 11 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................. ............. 18 CONCLUSIONS......................... .... ................................. 19 APPENDIX A - Turning Movement Count Data APPENDIX B - Level of Service Tables and Printouts i LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Description Page 1 Location Map 2 2 1990 No Build Traffic Volumes 6 3 Trip Distribution (Percentages) 10 4 1990 Build Traffic Volumes (without Colonial 15 Shopping Plaza) 5 1990 Build Traffic Volumes (with Colonial 16 Shopping Plaza) LIST OF TABLES Table No. Description Page 1 Definitions of Levels of Service - Unsignalized 12 2 Definitions of Levels of Service - Signalized 13 3 Overall Levels of Service 17 ii THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK TRAFFIC STUDY INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to investigate the traffic impacts asso- ciated with the proposed construction of a retirement village to be located on Griffing Street north of School House Lane in Cutchogue. The development will consist of 160 units, and will be situated on a 46.16 acre site west of Depot Lane and south of County Road 48. A location map, Figure 1, is provided for reference. In addition to the proposed development, the Town of Southold requested that the report also consider the construction of a Colonial Shopping Plaza oa- a 7.1 acre site southwest of the retirement village. Therefore, for compari- son purposes only, this study assesses the impacts of the proposed development both with and without the construction of the Colonial Shopping Plaza. The site plan specifies a single access driveway with a landscaped is- land, which would extend to Griffing Street. Our assessment has determined: o The existing traffic conditions at the unsignalized intersections of State Route 25 (Main Street) at Griffing Street and County Road 48 at Depot Lane, as well as the signalized intersection of State Route 25 at New Suffolk Road. o The impacts on the capacity and level of service of the study inter- sections due to the proposed development. In performing our evaluation, we had available a copy of the site plan dated 1984. In addition, turning movement counts were taken at the intersec- tions of State Route 25 at Griffing Street, CR 48 at Depot Lane and SR 25 at New Suffolk Road. -1- t •� �;+ �, dor ` — �; i ��- EXISTING CONDITIONS • Roadways State Route 25 (Main Street), south of the project site, is a two-lane roadway with parking lanes provided along both the north and south sides. The actual lane widths vary within the range of 11 to 17 feet. The parking lanes are nine feet wide and exist primarily in the vicinity of the intersection of New Suffolk Road and SR 25. The roadway is curbed and there are existing con- crete sidewalks along the north and south sides. The speed limit on SR 25 is posted at 35 mph in the vicinity of the site. New Suffolk Road, south of the project site, is a 32-foot wide two lane roadway without shoulders. Its intersection with SR 25 is controlled by a three phase actuated signal, with a turn phase for westbound lefts. The speed limit along New Suffolk Road is posted at 35 mph. Griffing Street, south of 1the project site, is 55 feet wide, and its intersection with SR 25 is controlled by a stop sign. It has curbs as well as an eight foot wide grass median that extends from the intersection at SR 25 to a point 185 feet north. Parking along Griffing Street is common and unre- stricted. County Road 48 is located approximately one mile north of the project access driveway. It is a four lane roadway with shoulders but no curbs. The lanes are 12 feet wide, while the shoulders range from 10 to 16 feet in width. A 25 foot wide grass median separates the eastbound and westbound traffic. The eastbound and westbound lane geometry on CR 48, approaching. the intersection with Depot Lane, includes two thru lanes, a left turn lane and a right turn lane.. The speed limit posted along CR 48 is 55 mph. Depot Lane, east of the project site, is a 34 foot wide two lane roadway without shoulders. Its intersection with CR 48 is controlled both by stop i signs and a flashing signal. -3- • Land Use Land use in the vicinity of the project site is mixed; however, north, east and west of the project site low density residential and farm lands pre- dominate. A school and several residences exist along School House Road. South of the project site, along Griffing Street, there are some small shops as well as a US Post Office. Along SR 25, south of the project site, the land usage is primarily commercial with scattered private residences. • Traffic Volumes In order to assess the impacts of the proposed development, manual traf- fic counts were obtained at key intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Previous counts conducted in the area indicated that peak volumes of traffic occur between 11:00 AM-12:00 noon and 4:00 PM-5:00 PM on weekdays, and between 11:00 AM-12:00 noon on Saturdays. These peak hours can be attributed to such influences as seasonal residents, rush hour traffic, and local ferry traffic. Based on this information, turning movement counts were performed at the key intersections of SR 25 at New Suffolk Road, SR 25 at Griffing Street and CR 48 at Depot Lane on Friday, July 15, 1988 and Saturday, July 23, 1988 during these peak periods. These turning movement count sheets may be found in Appendix A. Based upon these counts, it was determined that the weekday PM peak period (4-5 PM) and the Saturday midday period (11-12N) were the critical intervals for this analysis. -4- STUDY PROCEDURE The proposed development will contain a total of 160 residential units. The site plan calls for a single two-way access driveway, which will extend north from Griffing Street to the project site. The driveway in the vicinity of Griffing Street will have a large median island separating the two direc- tions of travel. The year 1990 was selected as the future design year for this analysis . A two and one half percent per year growth rate factor was assumed for the project area. This factor was applied to the existing traffic volumes to obtain a 1990 No-Build condition. A no-build condition means the proposed project is not yet constructed. The projected 1990 No-Build volumes are shown in Figure 2. The impact of the proposed development was assessed by superimposing the estimated trips generated by the site onto the projected 1990 No-Build traffic volumes for the same weekday PM peak and Saturday midday periods. o Sight Distance Sight distance is defined as the distance along a highway for which a vehicle or other object is continuously visible in daylight under normal atmo- spheric conditions. Sight distance is of particular importance at unsignal- ized intersections where restricted or limited visibility can hamper traffic flow and impact traffic safety. Accordingly, stop line sight distances were evaluated at the two unsig- nalized study intersections. At the four-way intersection of CR 48 and Depot Lane, a field check of the existing sight distances revealed excellent visi- bility in all directions. It was noted, however, that in the future some tree trimming may be necessary in the southwest corner of the intersection in order to maintain good visibility for the northbound Depot Lane approach. -5- ROUTE 48 ao� P.M. r 35 (SAT.) r r,6 a SCHOOL HOUSE LA. H z U. oc ROUTE 25 G Y. 6P.M. 479 WO 555♦ P.M. X29 (SAT.) lss4J ? (637) (SAT.) (590) N 53 /i8 (40) (//9) Z G.«^°ucome"TIfta P° ^ HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE 9p* 1990 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Ot.woi r... D^AWM NO. WAL DATE 87390 1 N.T.S. 10CT.'881 FIG. 2 -6- At the intersection of SR 25 and Griffing Street, the latter roadway "T"'s into SR 25. The sight distance from southbound Griffing Street to the west is excellent. To the east, however, the sight distance is approximately 200 feet, which is limited for the posted speed of 35 mph. The sight distance in this direction is restricted by the existing on-street parking along the north side of SR 25. Visual observations indicate, however, that most vehi- cles travelling along SR 25 cannot attain the posted speed of 35 mph due to the side friction in the area generated by the parked vehicles, parking maneu- vers and pedestrian activity. In addition, the proximity of the traffic sig- nal at the intersection of SR 25 and New Suffolk Road helps to reduce vehicu- lar speeds in the area. -7- STUDY FACTORS In order to estimate the traffic generated by the proposed development and to predict the routes taken by these vehicles, the following tasks were performed. o Trip Generation The trips generated by the proposed development were estimated based upon data contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (1987). As noted previous- ly, since the weekday midday peak hour is generally not the critical period, the trips were developed for the weekday PM peak and Saturday midday periods only. Based upon the proposed residential use of 160 units (Land Use Code 230), the estimated trips are as follows: PM PERIOD Residential Units: Fitted Curve: In (T) = 0.84 In (X) + 0.27 X = 160 units T 93 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 67% enter, 33% exit Trips: Entering 62 Exiting = 31 SATURDAY PERIOD Residential Units: Fitted Curve: T = 0.29 (X) + 43 X = 160 units T = 89 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 54% enter, 46% exit Trips: Entering 48 Exiting 41 As stated previously, the Town of Southold requested that this study con- sider the development of a Colonial Shopping Plaza on an adjacent parcel. Current zoning would permit a center of 33,000 SF to be built on the site; however, the proposed center is smaller in size at 22,000 SF. The estimated trips for this Colonial Shopping Plaza (Land Use Code 820) are as follows: -8- PM PERIOD Retail: Fitted Curve: Ln (T) - 0.52 Ln (X) + 4.04 X - 22.0KSF T - 284 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 49% enter, 51% exit Trips: Entering - 139 Exiting - 145 SATURDAY PERIOD Retail: Fitted Curve: Ln (T) - 0.62 Ln (X) + 3.97 X - 22.0 KSF T - 360 vehicle trips Directional Distribution: 51% enter, 49% exit Trips: Entering - 184 Exiting - 176 The following table compares the estimated trips generated by each of the two scenarios for both of the peak periods. WEEKDAY PM SATURDAY SCENARIO LAND USE ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT I - Proposed Project Resid. - 160 units 62 31 48 41 II - Proposed Project Resid. - 160 units 62 31 48 41 with Colonial Retail - 22,000 SF 139 145 184 176 Shopping Plaza TOTAL: 201 176 232 217 o Trip Distribution and Assignment The assignment of the generated traffic volumes among the various road- ways was based upon the existing trip patterns determined from the manual turning movement counts at the study intersections. The directional trip distribution used was: 43% utilizing CR 48 via Depot Lane, 27% from the east on SR 25, and 30% from the west on SR 25. The resulting entering and exiting trip assignment percentages for the proposed project are shown in Figure 3, Trip Distribution (Percentages). -9- y 23% 20% ROUTE 48 PROJECT SITE N N Q J O W '4 4396 r, SCHOOL HOUSE LA. -) �I cn 709'0 0 Iti 0 1N ZZFE o O 0 0 o a° M ~ N ROUTE 25 309'0 , 7%� G 7% � � 27% Y J LEGEND OU U. M -► LEAVING SITE N ----► ARRIVING SITE W Z c"'"'"No Pidisi HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE ce"ou�nro.rou.u�• gpi TRIP DISTRIBUTION (PERCENTAGES) 326 wool rou simoo DQMMMO NO. fCAli DATE 873 N.T.S. OCT.'88 FIG. 3 -1 u- CAPACM ANALYSIS Intersection- capacity analysis is an analytical tool which gives an ap- proximation of traffic conditions based on traffic volumes, roadway geometry, and signal phasing. Because of all the variables involved and other field conditions peculiar to a particular intersection, capacity analysis serves as a guide to the ability of an intersection to handle a given volume of traf- fic. Although not a precise science, this empirical method is useful in pre- dicting traffic conditions and quality of operation. Intersection capacity was developed using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. The methodology of the manual addresses two concepts to evaluate the traffic flow conditions at a particular intersection. The first is capacity, which results in computation of volume to capacity (V/C) ratios. This ratio relates existing or projected intersection traffic volumes to the volume at capacity. V/C ratios for individual movements and a composite V/C ratio (Xc) for the sum of critical movements or lane groups within the intersection are calculated under the manual procedures. The threshold capacity of V/C ratios is 1.0. The second concept is level of service which is based upon the aver- age stopped delay per vehicle for various movements within the intersection. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time and is dependent upon a number of variables. These variables include the quality of signal progression, cycle lengths, the green/cycle ratio, and the V/C ratio for the lane group or approach in question. Descrip- tions of the various levels of service are presented in Tables 1 and 2 for unsignalized and signalized intersections, respectively. -11- TABLE 1 1985 RCM LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR DNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The levels of service for an unsignalized intersection are given in terms of reserve capacity, in vehicles per hour for individual approaches, and general delay criteria. EXPECTED DELAY TO MINOR RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STREET TRAFFIC Equal to or A Little or no delay more than 400 300 to 399 B Short traffic delay 200 to 299 C Average traffic delays 100 to 199 D Long traffic delays 0 to 99 E Very long traffic delays Reserve Capacity: Reserve or unused capacity of a lane in passenger cars per hour. =12- TABLE 2 1985 HCH LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL-OF-SERVICE A describes operations with very low delay, A i.e., less than 5.0 sec per vehicle. This occurs when progres- sion is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE B describes operations with delay in the range B of 5.1 to 15.0 sec per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 sac , par vehicle. These higher delays may C result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may be in to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stap- ping' k LEVEL-OF-SERVICE D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 sec per vehicle. At level D. the influence of D congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high We ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the pro- portion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE E describes operations with delay in the range E of 40.1 to 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high We ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 sec per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, Is,, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the inter- section. It may also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. -13- The three study intersections were analyzed for the weekday PM peak and Saturday midday peak periods for the year 1990 under the following conditions: without the proposed development (1990 No Build), with the proposed develop- ment (1990 Build), and with the proposed development and a Colonial Shopping Plaza (1990 Build with Colonial Shopping Plaza). The 1990 No-Build volumes for the study intersections were shown previously in Figure 2. Figures 4 and 5 show the 1990 Build and 1990 Build with Colonial Shopping Plaza volumes, respectively. The results of the capacity analyses are presented in Tables B-1, B-2 and B-3 in Appendix B. A summary of the overall level of service for each of the intersections is shown in Table 3 on the following page. It can be seen from the table that the overall levels of service for the study intersections under the 1990 No Build condition are good, except for the intersection of SR 25 at Griffing Street, where the southbound left turn move- ment from Griffing Street will operate at a level of service E during both peak periods. A comparison of the overall levels of service experienced by the study intersections under the 1990 No Build condition and the 1990 Build condition indicates the impact of the proposed development will be minimal, with the overall intersection levels of service identical for both conditions.- As requested by the Town of Southold, the 1990 Build with Colonial Shop- ping Plaza condition was then compared to the 1990 No Build condition. Again, the levels of service will remain the same as those of the 1990 No Build cond- ition for the intersections of SR 25 at New Suffolk Road and SR 25 at Griffing Street. At the intersection of CR 48 and Depot Lane, however, the PM peak period level of service drops from a C to a D, and for Saturday, from a D to an E. These results indicate that the impact of the proposed development with the Colonial Shopping Plaza would be minor at the intersections of Route 25 at New Suffolk Road and Griffing Street, as no changes in level of service would occur. Some impact will be experienced at the Route 48 intersection with Depot Lane as a one level drop in service will occur. -14- ROUTE 48 PROJECT SITE 40� P.M. s2o J (s¢�J♦ (SAT.) (47) 60 less- (67) (72) 0 a W SCHOOL HOUSE LA. z U. oc - c� ROUTE 25 � o a � A Y *_742) —� ro37, P.M. 4 9 O 557 P.M. 9 (SAT.) (` 54) ? (640) (SAT.) "4Z s3 (40) )l (//9) W a` z GrNnman•P.doom- HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE COM.YI�IMO.M1�1ee 1e 1990 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES gpi , (WITHOUT COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA Sri West Yeue Sues. OIIAWMG NO. SCALE DAT9 N, 87398 T.S. OCT.'881 FIG. 4 —15— y ROUTE 48 PROJECT SITE l� 406 (5 76) (SAI.) (347) .i 8/ / 8 009) (i09) O -- a ,-, 0 N W SCHOOL HOUSE LA. H N Z COLONIAL u= SHOPPING M PLAZA 0 ROUTE 25 om,IN d'� cc UIT— 42 J (6a7) P.M. 479 OLL 507 P.M. 429 <� ♦ (SAT.) 474 4> j tbs 2 (SAT.) (�e> to (40) ro,9) 3 � N W Z GnAnmAn•PAder"n HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE COMB Ylf1Y0 e"O�YeeA• 4990 BUILD TRAFFICY LU gpi (WITH COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA 729 Wert run Street OIIAW/ o KALE DAT[ 'ie'te "' 't 7e1 87398 N.T.S. OCT.'88 FIG. 5 -1fa- TABLE 3 OVERALL LEVELS OF SERVICE THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE GPI JOB NO. 87398 WEEKDAY PM SATURDAY INTERSECTION CONDITION LOS Xc LOS Xc State Route 25 at 1990 No-Build B 0.70 C 0.88 New Suffolk Road 1990 Build B 0.70 C 0.88 1990 Build (with Colonial B 0.70 C 0.88 Shopping Plaza) State Route 25 at 1990 No-Build E -- E -- Griffing Street 1990 Build E -- E -- 1990 Build (with Colonial E -- E -- Shopping Plaza) County Road 48 at 1990 No Build C -- D -- Depot Lane 1990 Build C -- D -- 1990 Build (with Colonial D -- E -- Shopping Plaza) Kms: LOS: Level of Service - based upon the average stopped delay per vehicle. Xc: Volume to capacity ratio of the critical lane group. Note: All "Build" capacity runs were performed by optimizing the signal tim- ing at these locations. -17- RRCO1ENDiATIONS As illustrated in Table 3, the signalized intersection of SR 25 at New Suffolk Road and the unsignalized intersection of SR 25 at Griffing Street will not suffer any significant negative impacts under either of the 1990 Build conditions. The remaining unsignalized intersection of CR 48 at Depot Lane, however, will experience a reduction in level of service under the 1990 Build with Colonial Shopping Plaza condition. An examination of the levels of service in Table 3 shows that the signal- ized intersection of SR 25 at New Suffolk Road will experience the same level of service (B) for all three conditions during the PM peak period and a level of service (C) for all three conditions during the Saturday peak period. Similarly, the unsignalized intersection of SR 25 at New Suffolk Road experi- ences the same level of service (E) for all three conditions during both the PM and Saturday peak periods. In other words, the proposed development, both* with and without the Colonial Shopping Plaza, will not significantly impact the future operation of these intersections. It should be noted that field observations indicate queuing vehicles eastbound on SR 25 at the nearby inter-' section of New Suffolk Road often extend westward beyond the intersection with Griffing Street. These queuing vehicles frequently create gaps to allow left turning vehicles from Griffing Street to enter the traffic stream on SR 25. The unsignalized intersection of CR 48 at Depot Lane will also experience no change in level of service from the 1990 No-Build to the 1990 Build condi- tion. For the 1990 Build with Colonial Shopping Plaza condition, however, the overall intersection level of service during the PM peak period will drop from a C to a D, while during the Saturday peak period the overall intersection level of service drops from a D to an E. -18- CONCLUSIONS The following key statements summarize this study: o The project site is on a 46.16 acre site extending off of Griffing Street north of SR 25 (Main Street) and west of Depot Lane. The pro- posed site consists of 160 residential units with a single access driveway to Griffing Street. o Turning movement counts were taken at the intersections of SR 25 at Griffing Street, SR 25 at New Suffolk Road, and CR 48 at Depot Lane f rom 11 AM-12 PM and 4 PM-5 PM on a weekday and from 11 AM-12 PM on a Saturday. The two peak periods selected for analysis were the weekday PM (4-5 PM) and the Saturday midday (11 AM-12 PM) intervals. These volumes were then expanded to the design year of 1990 by the applica- tion of a growth rate factor of two and one half percent per year. o The vehicle trips were distributed on the roadway network based upon the existing trip patterns from the manual turning movement counts at the study intersections. o Although the existing stop line sight distance to the east at the intersection of SR 25 and Griffing Street is considered to be re- stricted for the posted speed limit of 35 mph, visual observations indicate that vehicles travelling on SR 25 frequently cannot attain the posted speed limit due to the occurrence of on-street parking maneuvers. Since vehicle speeds are directly related to the sight distance classifications, it is possible that the measured sight dis- tances may not be restrictive for the actual vehicle speeds along SR 25. -19- o The construction of either the proposed development or the proposed development with the Colonial Shopping Plaza will not significantly affect the future operation of any of the three intersections analyzed in this study. -20- APPENDIX A TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA i 7Greeo' nman-Pederson, Associates, P.C. ' 100 West Main Street. Babylon. L.1 . Now York 11702 v � :�000�000 �mmm -• �vo-����maEmm�mme�e�eme . �e���e�e��eme�eeovo� . �e�a��mommemme�o■ves� �amoo�ome���m�o�aemae� CONSULTING INGINGIFIS 'r-asomene IS141 Sol S4040 � 000�000�man�mmm�e� � aomomone��mo�nonm¢s �mmm mommomm amom� MEME mmmmommmmmmm� mmmmmmamomm Emom� mommmommmmmmmmmmm� Greenman-Pederson, Associates, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS : 100 West Main Street. Babyl6n. L I . Now York 11702 o� m In UK2m nun FORIM mmma=a lum ., mempert�e�te��e��e��emeee� n�e�w�Aoe�r�ee��e�eeosee� - rr�■�e�e�e��n�m�ee�eea� �s���e�eeme��o�eseee . �v���e�e�o��n�mv�eeevee 0 Greenman-Pederson, Associates, P.C. ! CONSU:LTING ENGINEERS 100 West Main Street. Babylon. L I New York 11702 o� nun�oo��mm0�� ,.MEMO mommmmmmmomn- man � mEmm mommmmm MOM=� r��ee�■om�e�m�mvA�� =mom mmm mmmmmmmmm 110mmommmmmommmmmmm mmmommommommmmmmm mommmmmmmmmommomm mommmmmmmommmmmom mommmmommmmommmmm mommmmmmmommmom mommmmommommmmomm e:���e�eeevo�m�memm�a OWE �000�aon man man�� �emnmonv�m�soese�� �eoe�000�a�osmonno� OEM mmm mumm� EME mmommommmmomMEMO mommomommommm� �emoemommoomveoemoommomommoommommm mn b mom mom EINIMMINEIMMI mmommomommoommomm momommmommommoomm MA Greenman-Pedersen, Associates, P.C. 1 00 West Main Street. Bab4on. L I . N*w York 11702 man man�mmm x�so�mme�e�mem�o�;oveoe JEEN mom M. 0- MOM"- Boom MEMEMOMEMOMEMEMEM "IMEMETIM. EMEMOMEMEMEM MEMEMMEMMOMEMEMEM MEMEMEMEMEMEMEME MEMEMEMEMOMEMEME MEMEMEMOMMOMMEME MEMEMEMEMOMEMENE MEMEMEMEMEMEMEME MEMEMEMEMOMEMENE MEMEMEMEMEMEMENE MEMEMEMEMEMEMENE xr�ertn��ameomo�nm��cmoev , u�e���eeoo�em�e�oe■oma MEMEMEMOMMEEMENEi� i o�. E - N ii -qW M LANK �X41"l Me- an-Pedersen, Associates, P.C. �noo�000�oora�mm0�� KIM* momom SE"offlemo offlommmun- meo�e�� MEEm91 Oman, eeeeo�m�mones» mo�e�eeeee�nmr��nemm� EWE mmonrAINEEMINIMEM EMENIMENINIMEEMEMEM Greenman - Pederson, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 100 W*sv Main L I Now York 11702 ISIGI 507 S060 �aoo�000�000�m0m�� � �mm mom now��mmmmmum m- mma annn; � mammm-1mum MEE mmmm� mmmmmamEMEM- eAee� mnmmmfmmmmmmemmmm�rsn MEMMINIMENINIMME momm APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLES AND PRINTOUTS TABLE B-1 1990 NO-BUILD INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE INTERSECTION PEAKWTRTTHHRU BOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND OVERALL LOS INTERSECTION CONTROL HOUR RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (LOS/Xc) State Route 25 PM C C -- -- -- -- B B B B -- (B/0.70) at Signalized New Suffolk Road SAT D -- D -- -- -- B B B B -- (C/0.88) State Route 25 PM -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E at Unsignalized* Griffing Street SAT -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E CR 48 PM B B B C C C A A A A A A C at Unsignalized* Depot Lane SAT C C C D D D A A A B B B D * The capacity of this unsignalized intersection was determined by utilizing the 1985 HCM method for unsignalized locations. The movements typically examined in these analyses are the left turns from the major road, and the left, thru and right turns from the side street. The thru movements on the major road would theoretically operate at LOS A. KEY: LOS: Level of Service - based upon the average stopped delay per vehicle. Xc: Volume to Capacity ratio of the critical lame groups. TABLB B-2 1990 BUILD (WITHOUT COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE INTERSECTION PEAK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND OVERALL LOS INTERSECTION CONTROL HOUR LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (LOS/Xc) State Route 25 PM C -- C -- -- -- -- B B B B -- (B/0.70) at Signalized New Suffolk Road SAT D -- D -- -- -- -- B B B B -- (C/0.88) State Route 25 PM -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E at Unsignalized* Griffing Street SAT -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E CR 48 PM C C C C C C A A A A A A C at Unsignalized* De po t Lane SAT D D D D D D A A A B B B D * The capacity of this unsignalized intersection was determined by utilizing the 1985 HCM method for unsignalized locations. The movements typically examined in these analyses are the left turns from the major road, and the left, thru and right turns from the side street. The thru movements on the major road would theoretically operate at LOS A. KEY: LOS: Level of Service - based upon the average stopped delay per vehicle. Xc: Volume to Capacity ratio of the critical lane groups. TABLE B-3 1990 BUILD (WITH COLONIAL SHOPPING PLAZA) INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE INTERSECTION PEAK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND OVERALL LOS INTERSECTION CONTROL HOUR LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT (LOS/Xc) State Route 25 PM C -- C -- -- -- -- B B B B -- (B/0.70) at Signalized New Suffolk Road SAT D -- D -- -- -- -- B B B B -- (C/0.88) State Route 25 PM -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E at Unsignalized* Griffing Street SAT -- -- -- E -- A A A -- -- A A E CR 48 PM C C C D D D A A A A A A D at Unsignalized* Depot Lane SAT E E E E E E A A A C C C E * The capacity of this unsignalized intersection was determined by utilizing the 1985 HCM method for unsignalized locations. The movements typically examined in these analyses are the left turns from the major road, and the left, thru and right turns from the side street. The thru movements on the major road would theoretically operate at LOS A. KEY: LOS: Level of Service - based upon the average stopped delay per vehicle. Xc: Volume to Capacity ratio of the critical lane groups. 3.. 9 8 5 H C M s S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T 2 ON S 1 3k Int It ve toe 3Ae ah 31ft lik IAe ft lag Is% !Ae 2Ae -Ae -At Vic At of lAe dt !Ae lk Vic *9 At -At lag lag -At -At .31e P O L YT E C HN 2 C UN=VERS 2 TY ------- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTERSECTION: STATE ROUTE 25 AND NEW SUFFOLK RD. ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FUTURE NO BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 AREA TYPE: CBD MISC.INFO: FILENAME: FNBSUFPM A ) C A P AC =TY AND L EVE L O F S ERV=C E -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- --- - - -- - - BY - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- --- - - -- - -BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH ************************************************* ************************ V/S X STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. FLOW V/C DELAY DELAY GROUP MVMT. RATIO CAP. RATIO (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- --------- --- -------- --------- --- EB TR .47 934 .7 6.5 B EB 6.5' B WB LT * . 49 840 .7 6 B` WB 6 B 1 NB LR * .15 263 .7 23.4 C NB 23.4 C SUM 2 NT E R S E C T=ON : ( V/ S ) c X c D E L AY L O S -- - ---- - -- -- -- --- - ---- -- - -- --- _ 64 _ 7 8 _ 5 B B ) =NPLJT VOLUMES -- - - - -- ---- -- MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LEFT 0 118 41 0 THRU 555 429 0 0 RIGHT 53 0 130 0 R-O-R 0 0 0 0 R-O-R - RIGHT-ON-RED VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. 1 9 8 5 C ) G E OM E TRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 TR 15 LT 11 LR 15 D ) T RA F F =C AND ROAD WAY C OND 2 T 2 ON S - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - --- -- - - - - - APPROACH: -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - --- -- - - - - -APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND GRADE (Ac) : 0 0 0 0 PERCENT HV: 2 2 2 2 PARKING: Y Y N N MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 5 5 0 0 ---------------- BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 --------------- PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .93 .93 .93 .93 ---------------- CONFLICTING ' PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 9 6 4 0 ------------------ PEDESTRIAN BUTTON: Y Y Y N MIN. GREEN TIME: 5.9 5.9 14.3 14. 3 ----------------- ARRIVAL TYPE: 3 3 3 3 ------------ E ) S Z GNA L T I M=NG AND P HA S I NG ————— — ——— — —————— ————————— INTERVAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # Y+AR GREEN L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA — ---- ----- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- 1 0 0 X X 2 0 0 X X X X 3 0 0 X X SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED Y+AR = YELLOW + ALL RED CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. GREEN = GREEN TIME LOST TIME PER PHASE: 3 SECS. RA = RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6 SECS. P = PEDESTRIAN PHASE 3- 985 H C M : S =GNAL= Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S 3 F ) C O R R E C T I ON F A C T O R S - -- ---- - - --- - - -- - - SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ******************** ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. GROUP FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW ------- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 1 1. 1 .99 1 . 88 1 .9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 .97 . 99 1 . 88 1 .9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1.1 .99 1 1 1 .9 . 8 . 87 1228 DEMAND VOLUME ************* GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ---- EB L 0 .93 0 EB T 555 .93 597 TR 654 1 1 1 654 EB R 53 .93 57 WB L 118 .93 127 WB T 429 .93 461 LT 588 1 1 1 588 WB R 0 .93 0 NB L 41 .93 44 NB T 0 .93 0 LR 184 1 1 1 184 NB R 130 .93 140 SB L 0 .93 0 SB T 0 .93 0 SB R 0 .93 0 3- 985 H C M : S =GNA L= Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S 4 los 3Ar *AV 'Ar lk *9 vit 3Ac zu lot -IV vic *c 'Ar 309 'Ar -At 'At 3k IV lk *t 3k 'Aft IAr vAr *9 *9 3Ar Ar 349 G ) EFFECT'=VE T=M2NG BY LANE GROUP - - - -- --- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - COMPUTED: - - -- --- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP **************************************** EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME (SEC) G/C ------- ----- --------- ----- EB TR 54.08 .68 WB LT * 56. 42 .71 NB LR * 17 .12 .21 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. ` A NOIZOES ZZS 'NOZ0Y3 HZMOS5 ZOE'IAZX SOH Oa SEWngOA a3H-No-SHOIH = x-0-x 0 0 0 0 W-O-2I 0 9ZT 0 011 ZHJIII 0 0 069 L£9 naHL 0 66 6TT 0 Z33'I ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---- aKAOSHZAOS aNnOSHL'dON aNnOSZSEM aKnOSSSY3 ZWAW -- - -- -- - - - - - - smpqnzozl Mriamm c s C> 6 - S T Be - T 8 — —— - - - -- — — — — - - -- -- - - - - - - --- - - - sori &'Nfz:uQ C>x cs /A. > = tgo=.6M0MSWMs.n= ' ren s a T'6£ HK a T'6£ 88 ' LTZ 9T' 2PI SK S T'TT SM 8 T'TT 88 ' 988 99' ZZ SM S 6'11T SH S 6'11T 88 ' 9118 119' ?IZ S3 --- --------- -------- --- --------- ----- ---- ----- ----- ------ SOZ (HEA/OSS) HOYOHddY SOZ (HEA/OSS) OIZYX 'dY0 OIZYX 'SWAW anowo xY'IEa xY'IEa 0/A MOU 'li dD EKYZ a3aaoZs a3aaoZs x SIA HoyouddY As dn02IJ EKYZ AS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- --- - - MO =ALxMs ac) zanaz CIMIV 2.z= =YNLralvc) c lf YS3nS8K3 :EWYNZII3 :03NI'OSIW aso :Ears Yzdy 88/9T/8 :SISAIYNY 30 EZYa auris ON zdnsn3 ZYs :SISA'IYNY 30 EWI.Z WIr :ZsAZYNY 'apt HZo33ns M3N aNY 9Z EZnOH ESYSS :NOIZOESHESNI - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - ---- A •Mx s2I3.A2karl => xMl4oaS.2r&.r c>a T Si�02.Z�� S2I� I.i�i2 Q3Z2rI�*1�IJ= S = LTH S86T 3sYHa NKIuSs3a3a = a 'S03S 9 :3701TI0 *I3d 3WIZ Zsoq MONNY NXlls SHJIV = Yui *SOBS £ :3SYHa v3d 3WIZ Lsoq 3WIZ N3310 = N33xo 's03S 08 :HSox3'I 3'I0x0 azN ZZY + MO'IZ3x = XY+x a3SYnSOY :3dxs 'IYNDIS x x 0 0. E x x x x 0 0 z x x 0 0 t -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - ----- ---- - YU a H Z Z YU a H S Z YU d u Z Z YU a H Z Z NHZ do DIY+x # aNnOSHsnOS axnosHS'ION aNnosiLs3M aNnOSZSY3 'IYAaalLNI --- - ---- - - - - - --- -- ---- --- �t� ------------ E E £ :3dxs 'IYAITHY ----------------- ' 6'S 6'S :3WIZ N332iJ 'NIW N x x x :NOssnS NYIuLmm ------------------ 0 6 L Ez : (dH/#) SNYIHss3a3d JNIZOI'I3N00 ---------------- T 6' TV T6* T6* :'I0SOY3 'dnOH XY3 d --------------- 0 0 0 0 : (SIH/#) JNIddOSS S3sna ---------------- 0 0 5 5 : (?IH/#) S*I3An3NYW N N x A :)NIxxyd z z z z :AH ZNZDdzd 0 0 0 0 3aY2I0 aNnOSHZnOS aNnosHLIION axnosLs3M aNnoSZSY3 :HOYOXddY - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - s iqo T m= akaoc) 2'L'vmaN'o2I am if x a a v-am c a St 2PI T Z'I St HS t ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---- HZaIM AOW HZaIM AOW HZaIM AOW HSaIM AON 3NYrl aNnOSHsn0S aNf10SHIVON aNnoaLs3M aNnOSSSY3 2VL 2f- mr- NZ MVL 2vt 30 &A SOL 30t 20L 2f- SOL aot 21L 30L apt 30L awt 20L 30 20L W 30 got aut 20 2p 30L 20L ftt SOL 3vt �2iS3L10�J Z S1�i02,I.��S2I3S.t�I2 QRZ ='ITdi�IJ2 S = LTH 5 8 6 T 1 9 8 5 H C M s S =GNA L 2 Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S 3 F ) C O R R E C T=ON F A C TOR S -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SATURATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ******************** ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. GROUP FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW ------- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 1 1 .1 .99 1 . 88 1 .9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 .97 .99 1 . 88 1 . 9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1.1 .99 1 1 1 .9 . 8 . 86 1214 DEMAND VOLUME GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ---- EB L 0 .91 0 EB T 637 .91 700 TR 744 1 1 1 744 EB R 40 .91 44 WB L 119 .91 131 WB T 590 .91 648 LT 779 1 1 1 779 WB R 0 .91 0 NB L 49 .91 54 NB T 0 .91 0 LR 191 1 1 1 191 NB R 125 .91 137 SB L 0 .91 0 SB T 0 .91 0 SB R 0 .91 0 1 9 8 5 H C M : S =GNAL 2 Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S 4 G ) E F F E C T=V E T=M 2 NG B Y LANE GR OU P - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPUTED: - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP **************************************** EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME(SEC) G/C ------- ----- --------- ----- EB TR 48 .94 .61 WB LT * 59. 46 .74 NB LR * 14. 3 . 18 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. ` 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S =GNA L = Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=O N S P O L YT E C HN=C UN=V E R S 2 TY INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 25 0 GRIFFING ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FUTURE NO BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: FNBGR25P A ) 2 N P UT VO L UM E S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) ******** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 0 39 42 THRU 479 637 0 RIGHT 42 0 40 B ) G E OM E T R Y WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) ********** ********** ********** # OF LANES 1 1 1 2 % GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 C ) AD.TU S TMENT FACTOR S - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN - AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 35 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 85 3- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L = Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T 2 ON S -At -Ac *c 2Ae it 'Ag 'Ac 3Ae -Ac 3Ae Ac Ac Ac lAc At 7Ae . Ac VAC 3Ae *c 'Ac -Ac *c *c -Ac D ) C R 2 T=C A L GA P A D.J U S TM E NT T A B L E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR SB LT 6. 8 0 6 . 8 RT 5.7 0 5.7 MAJOR EB LT 5. 1 0 5 . 1 E ) L EVE L O F S ERV 2 C E R E S U L T S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR SB LT ONLY 54 128 N.A. 74 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 52 626 N.A. 574 A MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 50 703 N.A. 653 A -1- 985 H C M : UN S I G NA L S Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T S O N S P O L YT E C HN S C UN 2 V E R S 2 TY INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 25 0 GRIFFING ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FUTURE NO BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: FNBGR25S A ) 2 N P UT V O L UM E S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) ******** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 0 35 62 THRU 554 615 0 RIGHT 85 0 37 B ) G E OM E T R Y WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) ********** ********** ********** # OF LANES 1 1 2 % GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 C ) IML D.7'U S TMENT FACTOR S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 35 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 92 3— S85 -AV 34C vit 3k Vk 349 349 'Ac 'At 'At ve 'Ac lAc log VV lk At 2at At AV Ac lAc VAC Ime lag lAc lAc At lAc Ac -Ac -Ac 3AC -Ac D ) < 1:;bCAL GAP ADJT.JSTMENT TABLE TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR SB LT 6 . 8 0 6 . 8 RT 5.7 0 5 .7 MAJOR EB LT 5. 1 0 5. 1 E ) L E V E L O F S E RV I C E R E S U L T S — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR SB LT ONLY 74 116 N.A. 42 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 44 552 N.A. 508 A MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 4'2 617 N.A. 575 A 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D =NT E R S E C T 2 0 N S VO L YT E C HN 2 C UN 2 V E R S =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 6 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FNB D.ATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC . INFO: FILENAME: NB4822P4 A ) 2NPUT VOLUMES - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 68 21 0 THRU 0 320 13 15 RIGHT 0 5 0 5 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ********** ********** ********** ********** # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F AC T O R S - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 - AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .91 1 9 8 5 it -Ac -xv PC he vk low ift 'Fc 2Ac lift 2c 'Ac -A c -At -At 3a 200 it -AV -Ac "Ac 'Ac ire 'Ac *c JAe �e *9 24e 'Ac ire VAC -Ac -Ac D ) C R =T 2 C A L G A P AD J U S TM E N T T ABL E - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L E V E L O F S E RV I C E R E S U L T S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 41 N.A. 353 312 B MINOR SB SHARED LANE 24 N.A. 446 422 A MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 692 N.A. 681 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 82 1000 N.A. 918 A -1. 985 H C M : UN S 2 G NA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S � 'Ac -Ac -Ae 24e 'Ac -At IAC Vic 7Ac Ilk 2Ae -At %Ac -Ac .3Ae -Ae !Ac -Ac -Yc -Joe 24e 14e vAc dr 7Ae -AC Ac it -AC -AC P O L YT E C HN 2 C UN=VERS =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FNB DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NB4822P3 A ) =NPUT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 68 0 6 THRU 406 0 34 9 RIGHT 35 0 35 0 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F AC TO R S - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .91 3- 985 � � ift � PC � � 3ft 3ft � � 'Ac � 'Ag lk lk � it � -At -Ac � � � *At -Ac � � � *c JAC *c D ) C R=T= C A L GA P AD J U S TM E N T T A B L E TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6. 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EV E L O F S E RVI C E R E S U L T S — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR NB SHARED LANE 83 N.A. 449 366 B MINOR SB SHARED LANE 18 N.A. 258 240 C MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 1000 N.A. 989 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 82 593 N.A. 511 A C 1- 985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L = Z E D S NT E R S E C T=ON S 3k !AC -Ac -Aa -At -AO 'At 3k -Aa 'Ac 'Ac At 'Ac ift -As it -AC -Ae -Ac vu -Ac vk �Ac 19e 149 3Ae 7Ae ZAe 2Ae 24C 2Ae INC 'JAC 'Ar ,Ac vOLYTECHNTC UNTVERS TTY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 @ DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FNB DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NB4822S3 A ) T N P UT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LEFT 15 62 0 7 THRU 576 0 61 13 RIGHT 56 0 78 0 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F A C T O R S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .97 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L 2 Z E D S NT E R S E C T S O N S , -4k 2k 7Ae vk -Ae lag -Ac -k ie ve -At -k -Ac 'Ac lk it 'Ac 2Ae -Ac -Ac ft lk he IAe Ile Ac yr lAe -Ae 'Ac ik it D ) C R=T=C AL GA P AD J'U S T M E NT T A B L E - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 _ E ) L E V E L O F S E R V 2 C E R E S U L T S - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 157 N.A. 365 208 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 23 N.A. 150 127 D MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 1000 N.A. 983 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 70 451 N.A. 381 B I1- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L = Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S P O L Y T E C HN= C UN=VERS 2 T Y INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS : SAT FNB DRTE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NB4822S4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - A ) =N P UT VOLUME S FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 15 62 44 0 THRU 0 348 17 20 RIGHT 0 5 0 11 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ********** ********** ********** ********** # OF LANES 3 t 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 It 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F A C TO R S - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .97 1- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L = Z E D =NT E R S E C T 2 Ol�TS D ) C R 2 T=C A L GA P AD J U S TM E N T T A B L E - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 .5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6.5 0 6. 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L E V E L O F S E RV I C E R E S U L T S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - t MOW T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR NB SHARED LANE 69 N.A. 321 252 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 35 N.A. 455 420 A MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 668 N.A. 651 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 70 1000 N.A. 930 A 3- S85 H C M : S =GNA L 2 Z E D =NT E R S ECT Z ON S 1 --- -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - � P O LYT E C HN= C UN=VERS =TY INTERSECTION: STATE ROUTE 25 AND NEW SUFFOLK RD. ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: FUTURE BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 AREA TYPE: CBD MISC.INFO: FILENAME: FSUFFPM A ) C A P A C =TY AND L EVE L O F S E RV S C E - -- - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - BY -- - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- -BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH ************************************************* ************************ V/S X STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. FLOW V/C DELAY DELAY GROUP MVMT. RATIO CAP. RATIO (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- --------- --- -------- --------- --- EB TR .47 937 .7 6 .5 B EB 6.5 B WB LT * . 49 840 .7 6 B` WB 6 B NB LR * .15 263 .7 23. 4 C NB 23.4 C S UM I NT E R S E C T=ON : ( V/ S ) c X c D E L AY L O S -- - -- - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- - - --- _ 64 _ 7 8 _ 5 B B ) 2 N P UT VOLUMES -- - - - - ---- - - - MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LEFT 0 118 41 0 THRU 557 429 0 0 RIGHT 53 0 130 0 R-O-R 0 0 0 0 R-O-R = RIGHT-ON-RED VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. 3- 985 H C M : S 2 GNA L 2 Z E D Z NT E R S E C T 2 ON S 2 -sic -Ac !Ac at -its -Jfti i4c lac ve Xft .4% ve -Aft, vft Ift -s% -At ift .416 -Ag -Ac !06 Ime At -At At -ot *c -Ac -Ac me Inc Ift C ) G E OM E TRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 TR 15 LT 11 LR 15 D ) T RA F F = C AND ROAD WAY C OND S T I ON S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACH: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND GRADE 0 0 0 0 PERCENT HV: 2 2 2 2 PARKING: Y Y N N MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 5 5 0 0 ---------------- BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 --------------- PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .93 .93 .93 .93 ---------------- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 9 6 4 0 ------------------ PEDESTRIAN BUTTON: Y Y Y N MIN. GREEN TIME: 5.9 5.9 14.3 14. 3 ----------------- ARRIVAL TYPE: 3 3 3 3 ------------ E ) S 2 GNA L T 2 M 2 NG AND P HA S =NG ——— —— — ———— —— ——— — —— — — —— ——— INTERVAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # Y+AR GREEN L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA — ---- ----- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- 1 0 0 X X 2 0 0 X X X X 3 0 0 X X SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED Y+AR = YELLOW + ALL RED CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. GREEN = GREEN TIME LOST TIME PER PHASE: 3 SECS. RA = RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6 SECS. P PEDESTRIAN PHASE 1 9 8 5 H C M : S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S 3 -At i t IAe elle yh low lth lk IAe 14e dk yet -Ae it -At -At -At A -Itte yk .At -Ae IAe 'At 'Ac 'At At lot IAe 'Ac *a At Ith F ) C O R R E C T=ON F A C T O R S --- ---- -- - - - - - --- - SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ******************** ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. GROUP FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW ------- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 1 1 .1 .99 1 . 88 1 .9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 .97 .99 1 .88 1 .9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1.1 .99 1 1 1 .9 . 8 . 87 1228 V DEMAND VOLUME ************* GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ---- EB L 0 .93 0 EB T 557 .93 599 TR 656 1 1 1 656 EB R 53 .93 57 WB L 118 .93 127 WB T 429 .93 461 LT 588 1 1 1 588 WB R 0 .93 0 NB L 41 .93 44 NB T 0 .93 0 LR 184 1 1 1 184 NB R 130 .93 140 SB L 0 .93 0 SB T 0 .93 0 SB R 0 .93 0 X985 H C M z S =GNA L= Z E D-At Ift vir Ift vic 3k 3k 3ft At At Ift At -At -jig -aft 2k -At 2it %ft -At -At vft low .3ic lot at At Ing Ing vot 14C At lot =NT E R S E C T=ON S 9 G ) E F F E C T=VE T=M=NG B Y LANE G ROU P - - - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - COMPUTED: - - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - -COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME(SEC) G/C ------- ----- --------- ----- EB TR 54.25 . 68 WB LT * 56. 42 .71 NB LR * 17 .12 .21 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. 1- 985 H C M : S =GNA L = Z E D Z NT E R S E C T=ON S 1 'At 2At iit lit 7Ac lot A IAt in lk %At A lag *At vic lag 3At lk IAt %At lk log 2At *At 3At 09 *9 jig 349 lAt lag aAt 7At P O LYT E C HN I C UN=VERS 2 TY INTERSECTION: STATE ROUTE 25 AND NEW SUFFOLK RD. ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FUTURE BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 AREA TYPE: CBD MISC.INFO: FILENAME: FSUFFSAT A ) C A P A C =TY AND L EVE L O F S ERV= C E -- -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - BY - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- -BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH ************************************************* ************************ V/S X STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. FLOW V/C DELAY DELAY GROUP MVMT. RATIO CAP. RATIO (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- --------- --- -------- --------- --- EB TR . 54 849 . 88 14.7 B EB 14.7 B WB LT * .65 885 . 88 11.1 B" WB 11.1 B NB LR * .16 217 . 8$ 39.1 D NB 39.1 D S UM =NT E R S E C T 2 ON : ( V/ S ) c X c D E L AY L O S -- - - --- -- - -- ------ --- - - -- - - --- _ 81 _ 88 15 _ 8 C B ) 2 N P UT VOLUMES - ----- - -- ---- MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LEFT 0 119 49 0 THRU 640 590 0 0 RIGHT 40 0 125 0 R-O-R 0 0 0 0 R-O-R - RIGHT-ON-RED VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. 3- 985 H C M s S 2 GNA L= Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S C ) G E OME TRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 TR 15 LT 11 LR 15 D ) T RA F F =C AND ROAD WAY C OND=T 2 ON S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - APPROACH: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND GRADE 0 0 0 0 PERCENT HV: 2 2 2 2 PARKING: Y Y N N MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 5 5 0 0 ---------------- BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 --------------- PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .91 .91 .91 .91 ---------------- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 23 7 9 0 ------------------ PEDESTRIAN BUTTON: Y Y Y N MIN. GREEN TIME: 5.9 5.9 14.3 14 .3 ----------------- ARRIVAL TYPE: 3 3 3 3 ------------ 0 ) S 2GNAL TSM=NG AND P'HAS 2NG —— — — —— —— ——— —— — —— — —— — ————— INTERVAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # Y+AR GREEN L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA – ---- ----- – – – – -- – – – – -- – – – – -- – – – – -- 1 0 0 X X 2 0 0 X X X X 3 0 0 X X SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED Y+AR = YELLOW + ALL RED CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. GREEN = GREEN TIME LOST TIME PER PHASE: 3 SECS. RA RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6 SECS. P PEDESTRIAN PHASE I3- 985 H C M s S 2 GNA L S Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T S ON S 3 JF C O R R E C T 2 ON_F A C T O R S SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ******************** ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. GROUP FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW ------- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 1 1 . 1 . 99 1 . 88 1 .9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 .97 . 99 1 . 88 1 .9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1 .1 .99 1 1 1 .9 .8 . 86 1214 DEMAND VOLUME ************* GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ---- EB L 0 .91 0 EB T 640 .91 703 TR 747 1 1 1 747 EB R 40 .91 44 WB L 119 .91 131 WB T 590 .91 648 LT 779 1 1 1 779 WB R 0 .91 0 NB L 49 .91 54 NB T 0 .91 0 LR 191 1 1 1 191 NB R 125 . .91 137 SB L 0 .91 0 SB 'T 0 .91 0 SB R 0 .91 0 i 1 9 8 5 MC--k4 4 G -- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- ) E F F E C T=V E T=M 2 NG B Y L AN E G ROU P COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP **************************************** EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME(SEC) G/C ------- ----- --------- ----- EB TR 49.14 .61 WB LT * 59.46 .74 NB LR * 14. 3 .18 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L = Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S P O L YT E C HN= C UN=VERS 2 TY INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 25 0 GRIFFING ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FUTURE BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 MISC.INFO: FILENAME: FGRIFPM AO =N P UT VOLUME S -- - -- - - - - -- - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) LEFT 0 58 44 THRU 479 637 0 RIGHT 42 0 49 B ) G E OM E T R Y WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) # OF LANES 1 1 2 % GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 C ) AD JU S TM ENT FACTOR S - - --- - - - -- --- -- -- - VEHICLE - --- - - - -- --- -- -- -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 35 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .85 3- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T 2 ON S D ) C R 2 T=CAL GA P AD.T U S TME NT TA B L E - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- TABULAR - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR SB LT 6. 8 0 6 . 8 RT 5.7 0 5.7 MAJOR EB LT 5.1 0 5. 1 E ) L EVE L O F S ERV 2 C E R E S U L T S - ----- - --- --- -- - - - - --- - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR SB LT ONLY 57 119 N.A. 62 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 63 626 N.A. 563 A MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 75 703 N.A. 628 A 3- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L = ZED Z NT E R S E C T 2 ON S AAs low .09 -At !At l+t it it Vit 14V lk 11% yt 3k iow 2k vu low it it 'At "Ac 'At -Ac IAc 3k At lk vit 14e it Vic yt P O LYT E C HN= C UN=V E R S =TY INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 25 0 GRIFFING ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FUTURE BUILD DATE OF ANALYSIS: 8/16/88 MISC.INFO: FILENAME: FGRIFSAT A ) INPUT VOLUMES -- - - - - -- -- - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) LEFT 0 49 65 THRU 554 615 0 RIGHT 85 0 49 B ) G E OM E TRY WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) # OF LANES 1 1 2 % GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 C ) ADJUSTMENT F ACTOR S - --- - -- - - - -- -- - - - - VEHICLE --- - -- - - - -- -- - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 35 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .92 3- 985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L=Z E D =NT E R S E C T S ON S aft -jot 3k yr 3k 3k -jAc Vie lk .4% lk »e aye lk 3k -Ag 'At lk lot -Ac -Ae log ve uk -At 7Ae %it AAs IAC ame lot 1Ae lot -Ac -jAc D ) C R 2 T=CAL GA P ADT U S TM E NT TA B L E - ----- ---- - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - - - TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR SB LT 6. 8 0 6.8 RT 5.7 0 5.7 MAJOR EB LT 5.1 - 0 5. 1 E ) L EVE L O F S ERV=C E R E S U L T S -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR SB LT ONLY 78 111 N.A. 33 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 59 552 N.A. 493 A MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 54 617 N.A. 558 A P O L YT E C HN= C UN=V E R S =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 6 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FB COND DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC.INFO: FILENAME: NB4822P7 A ) 2 N P UT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 80 0 6 THRU 406 0 41 9 RIGHT 49 0 42 0 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ********** ********** ********** ********** # OF LANES 3 Is 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F A C T O R S - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .91 3- 985 -Ar Ac 'Ar 'Ar Vic *ik 'Ar -Ar yr 'Ac Ac *9 air it -Ar -Ar -jAr IAr 7Ar *r *r sir 'JAC !Ar *JAr -Ar 'Ar 'Ac 'Ar 'Ac low 'Ar Ar D ) CR=T2CAL GAP AD.TZ.JSTMENT TABLE - - - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EV E L O F S E RV 2 C E R E S U L T S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - it MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 101 N.A. 429 328 B MINOR SB SHARED LANE 18 N.A. 232 214 C MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 1000 N.A. 989 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 97 583 N.A. 486 A 3- 985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L = Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T 2 ON S P'OLYTECHN= C UN=VERS TTY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FB COND DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC . INFO: FILENAME: NB4822P8 A ) 2NPU'I' VOLUMES - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 80 28 0 THRU 0 320 13 15 RIGHT 0 5 0 5 B ) G E OM E T R Y EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) ADJUSTMENT F ACTOR S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .91 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T =O N S Ar Ar 34e ik lik 2k Ac 'Ag it vie Ag 'Ac lik lAc 2Ae -Ac lik ih -Ac 2Ac 'Ac ytr Ae IAC *9 INC INC 149 �c �e IAc 'Ac 'Ac Ar � D ) C R=T 2 C A L GA P A13 J U S TM E N T T A B L E - - - -- --- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - -- --- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6. 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EVE L O F S ERV=C E R E S U L T S - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 50 N.A. 338 288 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 24 N.A. 435 411 A MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 692 N.A. 681 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 97 1000 N.A. 903 A 1- 985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L 2 Z E D 2 N T E R S E C T=O N S -Ac -Ac -Ae me lik 30e ie zic 'Ac -Jae 'At 'Ac 'Ac 'Ac 'Ac -Ac -iAc *Ac 7Ac zic -1c 30e zic �k -Aa 'Ac 7Ac lk 7Ac Vk P O L YT E C HN= C UN 2 V E R S =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS : SAT FB COND DATE OF ANALYSIS : 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NB4822S8 A ) =NPUT VOLUMES - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 15 72 56 0 THRU 0 348 17 20 RIGHT 0 5 0 11 B ) G E OM E T RY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 ',b 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD.TU S TMENT FACTOR S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .97 1 9 8 5 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L 2 Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S D ) C R 2 T=C A L GA P A D J U S T M E NT T A B L E - - - - - --- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 .5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EVE L (DIF S E RV I C E R E S U L T S - - - - - -- - --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 83 N.A. 309 226 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 35 N.A. 445 410 A MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 668 N.A. 651 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 82 1.000 N.A. 918 A 3- 985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L = Z E D =NT E R S E C T=O N S � 'At afe *c Ae lot Ae aye 'Ac -At �e *e l+t -Ac 'Ac VV -Ac Ve !Ac IAe 'At yr !Ae *At 'Ac *Ac At *c dt 2k yt 1A 24e 2Ae Vic P'O LYT E C HN 2 C UN=VERS 2 TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS : SAT FB COND DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NB4822S7 A ) 2 N P UT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 15 72 0 7 THRU 576 0 73 13 RIGHT 67 0 86 0 E3 ) G E CDM E T RY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM ENT F A C T O R S -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .97 1. 9 8 5 -Ac AC aAe aIle vk 'At 'Ac 'Ac Zk air 'At ft 'At aAe aAc aAe aAe -Ac aAc arc aAe aAc aAc aAe VAC Ac 149 149 aAe Joe 'Ac aA; aAc -fe yt D ) C R=T=C AL GA P A D J U S TM E NT TA B L E - - - - ---- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 .5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) LEVEL OF' SERV= CE RESULTS - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR NB SHARED LANE 181 N.A. 344 163 D MINOR SB SHARED LANE 23 N.A. 130 107 D MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 1000 N.A. 983 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 82 444 N.A. 362 B 198 HGM 2 S I GMochI I Z ED I t4 TEFRE3ECT I C3P4a -m--X--m--m--w-m--w-I[--w-w-X--]rt--X--:rt-A*--a�-w-m--m--X-4c-46--J*--31&4�-m--*-4*-if--m--w-:X- POLYTECHN I iC UP4 I VEFRS I -r N' INTERSECTION: STATE ROUTE 25 AND NEW SUFFOLf-.; RD. ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FH SC 22TSF DATE OF ANALYSIS: 14/19/88 AREA TYPE: CPD MISC. INFO: FILENAME: NS2522PM ---------._------------------------------------------------------------------- A I T'Y 0Z§h.I13 I C3F '-3EFZCV I CE -------------------------------- BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH V/S X STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. FLOW V/C DELAY DELAY GROUP MVMT. RATIO CAP. RATIO (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- --------- --- -------- --------- --- EB TR . 48 95:3 . 7 6.2 B EB 6.2 8 WB LT .49 840 .7 6 B WB 6 B NB LR * . 15 26:3 . 7 23. 4 C NB 2.3:4 C S U M I h4TEFi1SEiCT I C3 M a C W/ !E3 } X c DELAY LOfs _ 6 4- E3 - :m � E39 I MF= UT '•JOL—UMEE3 ------------- MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LEFT 0 lie 41 0 THRU 567 429 0 0 RIGHT 53 0 130 0 R-O-R 4 0 0 0 R-O-R = RIGHT-ON-RED VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. I 9E3Mi "(--Mm E31 (3IVd=rL I ZED I PIT'ERCSECT I 01ME3 34--NE--3F-i*-m- -311--w-w iE iE-w-w-W-3*-W•art--3E-)•E-W-3f-W -art-Orr 4E 4(--art--W-W-3+-m- (3 E—=C)M FEE-r F:R V m- CaECIMETF::Y EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 TR 15 LT 11 LR 15 D ) -f-RAFF I C: APaD RCaADWAY 01C3PI1E) I T I CI PI E3 -------------------------------- APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND -------- 363F3F3F3P*��•� *�•��•�•*�*� **��*-�*��� 3F3S•3EiE3E3(•3F3EdF3F GRADE i%) : 0 0 0 0 PERCENT HV: 2 2 ----------- PARKING: Y Y N N MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 5 5 D 0 ---------------- BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 --------------- PEAK. HOUR FACTOR: . 93 . 93 . 93 .93 ---------------- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 9 6 4 0 ------------------ PEDESTRIAN BUTTON: Y Y Y N MIN. GREEN TIME: 5.9 5.9 14..3 14. .3 ----------------- ARRIVAL TYPE: 3 3 3 3 E ) E3 I CSPIAL T I M I MC3 APII? F"HACS I PICS INTERVAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 3l•aE3P�3F•11••3(•3F3F3F3E3E 3F*•11.3t•343Fd(•3EdI••IE3t••1131• a(•3F31.3f•dl•dI•-1E di 3t.li•*16* d!•3(••lI•if•9(•3EdI••lt•1f3E3F*3M iFit•3E3i.•1E34-i(•�3t•3EiEif••fE # Y+AR GREEN L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA — ---- ----- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- 1 0 0 X X 2 0 0 X X X X 0 0 X X SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED Y+AR = YELLOW + ALL RED CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. GREEN = GREEN TIME LOST TIME PER PHASE: 3 SECS. RA = RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6 SECS. P = PEDESTRIAN PHASE 1 98� HCM � S I GhIAL I �ED I 1'*ITEFZSECT I OI�JS -�-�-�-�-}c-�-�c--���--�-�-�-�--��-�-�-�--�-�-�art--�-�-�•�--��••-�-�--��- F= ? (--OFRFREC--T 103r%J FfNC:-rC7F:;�-c3 SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. .GROUF' FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW EB TR 1800 1 1 . 1 . 99 1 . 88 1 . 9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 . 97 .99 1 Be, 1 . 9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1 . 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 . 8 . 87 1228 DEMAND VOLUME GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE EB L r) . 93 0 EB T 567 . 93 610 TR 667 1 1 1 667 EB R 5.3 .9.3 57 WB L 118 . 93 127 WB T 429 . 93 461 LT 588 1 1 1 588 WB R 0 .93 0 NES L 41 . 93 44 NP T O . 93 O LR 184 1 1 1 184 NB R 130 .93 140 SB L 0 .93 0 SB T 0 .93 0 SB R O .93 0 1 48� HCM : S I GhJAL I Z ED I h.ITE�EECT I Chl� � G EFFECT I VE T I M I P4[3 E-cY L-Ah1E GF=%-:CUF=' COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME (SEC) G/C --------- ----- EB TR 55. 16 . 69 WB L'T * 56. 42 .71 NB LR * 17. 12 . 21 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. 1 98.�r HC:M a S I GNAL I Z ED I hlTEFc'BEF_C;T I C3 NJc-3 _w-w-w-X--:rt--w-_w_--IN&_--w a�-w�_X__w-X_.-X- F•OLYTECHM I G UNJ I %JEftiE3 I TY INTERSECTION: STATE ROUTE 25 AND NEW SUFFOLK RD. ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FB SC 22TSF DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/19/86 AREA TYPE: CBD iii I SC. I NFO: FILENAME: NS2522SA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A } C:AF'AC.; I 'TY r"-rMID I FEE VF-L C]F' 1SEF�<",01 I CE ----------------------------- BY ----------------------------BY LANE GROUP BY APPROACH V/S X STOPPED STOPPED LANE CRIT. FLOW V/C DELAY DELAY GROUP MVMT. RATIO CAP. RATIO (SEC/VEH) LOS APPROACH (SEC/VEH) LOS ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- --------- --- -------- --------- --- EB TR .55 864 .88 14.3 H EH 14.3 B WEA LT * .65 885 . 88 11. 1 B WB 11. 1 B NB LR * . 16 217 . Qe 39. 1 D NH .39. 1 D E3um I NlTEF;:SI-E —r :11 C7 hl m C V X E3 } c X c DELAY LC E3 ------------ ------ ———— ----- --- G1 _ E3G is _ 4!E2 C: T } I1%4F•UT VC7LUMEG ------------- MVMT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LEFT O 119 49 0 THRU 652 590 O 0 RIGHT 40 0 125 0 R-O-R 0 t 0 0 R-O-R = RIGHT-ON-RED VOLUMES DO NOT REFLECT GROWTH FACTOR. SEE SECTION F. I1 98.3-5 "(=M X S I CRJAL.- I ZED I NTEF �, a- ECT I QI'+tS art•art-x•x-x-x-_ -- art-�x-x-art-x--*x-art-art-x-x-x-x-x-art•4*-x--:rt-x-art-x•x--m- C3 m- CECMETFRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH -------- 1 TR 15 LT 11 LR 15 I? )o TF-<AFF I C AN10 FRCAL)WAY C0iVL7 I T I ChIS --------------------------------- APPROACH: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND GRADE (%) : 0 0 0 �a PERCENT HV: 2 2 2 2 PARKING: Y Y N N MANEUVERS (#/HR) : 5 5 0 0 ---------------- BUSES STOPPING (#/HR) : 0 0 0 0 --------------- PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 91 . 91 .91 .91 ---------------- CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS (#/HR) : 2.3 7 9 0 ------------------ PEDESTRIAN BUTTON: Y Y Y N MIN. GREEN TIME: 5.9 5.9 14. .3 14. 3 ----------------- ARRIVAL TYPE: 3 3 .3 .3 ------------- E y S I CNAL T I M I IVC P4 11) F'HAS I NG INTERVAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # Y+AR GREEN L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA L T R P RA — ---- ----- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- — — — — -- 1 0 0 x x In 4. 0 x x x x 3 0 0 x x SIGNAL TYPE: ACTUATED Y+AR YELLOW + ALL RED CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. GREEN = GREEN TIME LOST TIME PER PHASE: a SECS. RA = RIGHT TURN ARROW LOST TIME PER CYCLE: 6 SECS. P = PEDESTRIAN PHASE "C;M o S3I 1"-atVAL I Zl=_n I h#TEFtSEc�T I QhIS - F=' > CQ FtFcFEE CT I ON FOct CTL7F;t1B -----=--------------- SATURATION FLOW RATE IDEAL ADJ. LANE SAT. # OF f f f f f f f f SAT. -GROUP FLOW LANES W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW ------- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---•- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- EB TR 1800 1 1 . 1 . 99 1 . 88 1 . 9 . 89 1 1382 WB LT 1800 1 .97 .99 1 Be. 1 . 9 1 . 87 1191 NB LR 1800 1 1 . 1 . 99 1 1 1 . 9 . 8 . 86 1214 DEMAND VOLUME ` GROUP LANE ADJ. APPR. MVT. FLOW LANE FLOW # OF .. UTILZN GROWTH FLOW MVMT. VOL. PHF RATE GROUP RATE LANES FACTOR FACTOR RATE ___-- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ---- EB L %0 . 91 0 EB T 652 .91 716 TR 760 1 1 1 760 EB R 40 .91 44 WB L 119 .91 131 WB T 590 . 91 648 LT 779 1 1 1 779 WB R 0 .91 0 NB L 49 .91 54 NB T 0 .91 0 LR 191 1 1 1 191 NB R 125 .91 137 SB L O .91 0 SB T 0 .91 0 SB R O .91 0 GM L- I Z ED I ItiJTEF;:SEiCT I t]hIS I C 7 EFFECT I VE_T I M I "c3 E;cYt_Ai E�iGF:OUB COMPUTED: EFFECTIVE TIMING BY LANE GROUP EFFECTIVE LANE CRIT. GREEN GROUP MVMT. TIME (SEC) G/C EB TR 49. 99 . 62 WB LT * 59. 46 . 74 NB LR * 14. .E . 18 CYCLE LENGTH: 80 SECS. I 98n HC;M a UME3 I C-3RIAL_ I Z ED I M_raFRE3EC1T I C3M!B art•art-art-- art-art-art•-w w-art--mr art••-X-art-art-art-art-art-x-art-art-art-art-a3*art-art-q*-art- JF>C7LLYTEC:"P4 I C �lJP4 I %IEF<ES I -r N' INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 2v @ GRIFFING ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FB SC 22TSF - DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/19/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: GS2522PM ------------------------------------------._------------------------------------- 4:31 ) I P4F="UT W0L_UMES ------------- FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) LEFT 0 100 54 THRU 479 67 0 RIGHT 42 0 93 Ee 3 GEDMETFRY WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) # OF LANES 1 1 2 GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 C-- } r0b:D,J LJ STMIEP4T Fick iCTC7FtE3 ------------------ VEHICLE ----------------- VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : =5 - AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 85 I EB!S HCM lJMS; 113Md`kt — I Z ED I h1TEF:ZSECT I Qt%4E3 - art- art- - a•F - --IN[-X—-il*--X--art--�m—-X-q*q+•m- art- art- - art- �c-art- I� ? iGF:Z I T I SAL (3 =' I=kn0 UE3-1FMI---1�tT 'Tink E-4L—E TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES MINOR SB LT 6.8 i> 6. 8 RT 5. 7 0 5. 7 MAJOR EB LT 5. 1 5. 1 E L—E%«J E L CQ F :3 t=_F '•J I (--E: I R EFE IS I L—T'S ------------------------ MOV 'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR SB LT ONLY 70 106 N. A. 7.6 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 120 626 N.A. 506 A • MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 129 703 N. A. 574 A a I cPE3!ES 1-1CM : Uh15 I +GINJIick L I Z EID I r4TEF:SECT' I C3t%-IE; art art-art-art--x-art-art;-w-w art-art•art•art-art-art•of-art-art-art-at art-art-art-art-art-art--art-art-art-of art-art-art-art-art- F=-c3 ._'1P-ir r=— m I G—�J hg1.I F:S I T Y INTERSECTION NAME: STATE ROUTE 25 Cd VR I FF I NG ST ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FH SC 22TSF - DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/19/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: GS2522SA ---- ink I NF'LJT VC3L—UMES -------------- FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) MOVEMENT WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) LEFT t i 104 i4 77 THRU 554 615 0 RIGHT 85 0 102 Ea: > GEOMETF:Y WESTBOUND EASTBOUND MINOR (SB) # OF LANES 1 1 2 ti `/. GRADE 0 0 0 RT TURN 90 90 90 G } ichE)0USTMEhlT F'AC�'TVRS ------------------ VEHICLE -----------------VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 35 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK. HOUR FACTOR: .92 1 5paT55 HiC1'''t : LJ1VS I GmAl_ I Z ELS I t�iTEF��ICCTI Qi'�1� JD ) C--F;: I T I SAL_ SOC4F' A 13-,J LJE3-rME:P4-F -r FE-4L_E TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES MINOR SH LT 6. 8 0 6. 8 RT 5. 7 0 5. 7 MAJOR EB LT 5. 1 0 5. 1 E 3 L_E'+.•"1=L CSF' -c3IEF=Z',! I CE F=q:FEE E3UL_TS -------------------------- MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LDS MINOR SB LT ONLY 92 95 N.A. 3 E MINOR SB RT ONLY 122 552 N.A. 430 A- MAJOR EB LEFT TURN 1i4 617 N. A. 493 A i 1 9 8 5 H C M s UN S =GNA L = Z E D =NT E R S E C T=ON S P O L YT E C HN= C UN 2 V E R S =TY J INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FB SC 22 TSF { DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 -MISC. INFO: FILENAME: 1 A ) =N P UT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (Vph) MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 108 0 6 THRU 406 0 74 9 RIGHT 81 0 70 0 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) A D J U S TM E NT F A C TO R S - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 91 3- 985 H C M s UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S ECT maws D ) C R 2 T= C A L—GA P —AD%T U S TM ENT—T A B L E 1 TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6. 5 0 6. 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EVE L (:)Fl S E RV I C E R E S UL T S — — —— — — — —— — — ——— —— — — —— — — — — MOV'T SHARED . RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR NB SHARED LANE 174 N.A. 378 204 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 18 N.A. 165 147 D MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 1000 N.A. 989 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 131 558 N.A. 427 A 3- 985 H C M - UN S 2 GNA L 2 Z E D Z NT E R S E C T 2 ON S -Ac -Ac -Ac 7Ae -Ac -Ac 'Ac 109 Ift �Ae oc lk -Ac 'Ac -Ac Vic Ac JAC Ac At Ac At 3Aa lAe loc lAc JAe 7Ae loc 'Ac lac it Ac ire -oc P'O L YT E C HN= C UN=V E R S =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: PM FB SC 22 TSF DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: 3 A ) =N P UT VOLUME S - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 9 108 61 0 THRU 0 320 13 15 RIGHT 0 5 0 5 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ' # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD7US TMENT FACTOR S - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - VEHICLE - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: . 91 .r 1- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L S Z E D =NT E R S E C T 2 ON S -Ac IAe 'Aa 'At -At 'Ac *Ae ft dr !Ae *At 2Ae lk lk -Ar !AC -Ac JAe 'Ac yk vk -Ac -Ac i1e lk 'Ac -Ac *e *e 'Ac yr vie 'Ac -At Ac 1 D ) C R=T 2 C A L GA P AD J U S T M E N T TA B L E - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6 . 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L EVE L O F S E RV I C E R E S U L T S - - - -- --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 90 N.A. 309 219 C MINOR SB SHARED LANE 24 N.A. 410 386 B MAJOR EB LEFTS 11 692 N.A. 681 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 131 1000 N.A. 869 A 'w -L985 H C M : UN S 2 GNA L = Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S Vic 'AV arc it l3k VAc ire ih -Ac -Ae it Vic arc -Ac -Ac *Ac 'Ac 34e ik Vk 24e *c voc 'Ac 'Ac 'Ac "Ac Ac P O L YT E C HN 2 C UN=VERS 2 TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE { ANALYST: JIM TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FB SC 22TSF DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: 2 A ) INPUT VOLUMES - - - - - - - - - - - - - FULL - - - - - - - - - - - -FULL HOUR VOLUMES (Vph) MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LEFT 15 109 0 7 THRU 576 0 110 13 RIGHT 109 0 121 0 B ) G E OM E T RY r EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TM E NT F A C T O R S - - -- - - - - -- - --- - - - - VEHICLE - -- - - - - -- - --- - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB. APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAR HOUR FACTOR: .97 1- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D 2 NT E R S E C T=ON S D ) C R 2 T=CAL - - - -- -- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 " RT 6. 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6. 5 0 6. 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 - E ) L EVE L (:)IF S ERV= C E R E S U L T S = -- - - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - -- --- - MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS *********************** ****** ******** ******** ******** ***** MINOR NB SHARED LANE 262 N.A. 278 16 E MINOR SB SHARED LANE 23 N.A. 65 42 E MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 1000 N.A. 983 A i MAJOR WB LEFTS 124 419 N.A. 295 C i 1- 985 Ac -Ae i1e ZAe 'At lik 7Ae AV 'At At lAc *c QAC 'Ac Aft -JAC Zoe yie lAe -Ac At Ac 2Ae QAC lk 2AC lAC lot 20e -.Ac -Ac -Ae 'At lie -Ac QO L YT E C HN 2 C UN=VERS =TY INTERSECTION NAME: CR 48 0 DEPOT LANE ANALYST: JIM { TIME OF ANALYSIS: SAT FB SC 22 TSF 1 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10/21/88 MISC. INFO: FILENAME: 4 1 A ) INPUT VOLUMES - -- - - - - - - - - - - FULL HOUR VOLUMES (vph) P ) *********************** MOVEMENT EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ******** ********** ********** ********** ********** LEFT 15 109 93 0 THRU 0 348 17 20 RIGHT 0 5 0 11 B ) GEOMETRY EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND # OF LANES 3 3 1 1 % GRADE 0 0 0 0 RT ANGLE 90 90 90 90 C ) AD J U S TME NT F AC T O R S - - - - - - -- - - ---- - - - - VEHICLE - - - - - -- - - ---- - - - -VEHICLE COMPOSITION: UNKNOWN AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED ON MAJOR ROAD (mph) : 55 AREA POPULATION: 100000 CONTROL ON NB APPROACH: STOP SIGN CONTROL ON SB APPROACH: STOP SIGN PEAK HOUR FACTOR: .97 I1- 985 H C M : UN S =GNA L 2 Z E D =NT E R S E C T=O N S �k � � � lk 2k � VV zv vk � ift lk � � � VV � Vic 2k � 'Ac lAc �ft lk *c � � � me � lk -At � lok D ) C R =T 2 C A L GA P AD J U S TM E NT T A B L E I - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TABULAR - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TABULAR ADJUSTED ACTUAL VALUES BY VALUES ******* ******** ****** MINOR NB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6. 5 0 6 . 5 MINOR SB LT 8 . 5 0 8 . 5 TH 8 0 8 RT 6 . 5 0 6. 5 MAJOR EB LT 6 0 6 MAJOR WB LT 6 0 6 E ) L E V E L O F S E RV=C E R E S U L T S — — — — — — ———— — ————— — — — — — — — — MOV'T SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT AND LANE USAGE VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY LOS MINOR NB SHARED LANE 124 N.A. 274 150 D MINOR SB SHARED LANE 35 N.A. 412 377 B MAJOR EB LEFTS 17 668 N.A. 651 A MAJOR WB LEFTS 124 1000 N.A. 876 A APPENDIX G CORRESPONDENCE s a OREENMAN • PECER8EN, INC. BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL.MO JAMISON.PA April 7 , 1989 MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELD.CT NORTH BRANCH.NJ ORLANDO,FL Suffolk County Dept. of Parks Recreation and Conservation P.O. Box 144 Montauk Highway West Sayville, NY 11796 Attention: Commissioner Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI Job No. 87398 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings (4 units per building) on a 46. 16 acre site. The project is expected to attract a population of 320. Facilities are currently planned to serve the expected residents . It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon area County recreation facilities; indicate type and location of such facilities . Also, if you should feel there are other comments or information of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP: jw Enclosure 325 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (51615B7-5060 GREENMAN • PECERSEN, INC. L BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY.NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON.RA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELO,CT April 7 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO.FL Suffolk County Department of Parks , Recreation and Conservation Division of Cultural and Historic Services P.O. Box 144 Montauk Highway West Sayville, New York 11796 Attention: Director of Historic Services Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings on a 46.16 acre site. As estimated 29 acres will remain natural or vegetated. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon existing plans for the area. Please indicate how the project affects or is affected by such plans . Also, if there are any other comments or information you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP: jw Er1 1 o S WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 [516] 5a7-5060 how Mir - IF • GREENMAN • PEOER8EN, INC. BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL.MO JAMISON.PA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELD.CT April 7 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,w ORLANDO,FL Suffolk County Pines Barrens Review Commission H. Lee Dennison Building 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Commissioner Re : Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings on a 46.16 acre site. As estimated 29 acres will remain natural or vegetated. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon existing plans for the area. Please indicate how the project affects or is affected by such plans . Also, if there are any other comments or information you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : Enc 1 c,c-42S WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (516) 587-5060 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Richard Hanley Ira P. Costell Vice Chairman Chairman April 18, 1989 RE: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS - Senior Citizens Residence Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Consulting Engineers 325 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 Att. : Robert Pedneault, Project Eng. Dear Mr. Pedneault: Pursuant to Article 34 of the Suffolk County Charter and local rules written as such, the above referral will not be reviewed by this Commission for the reason below: o Subject property is not located in the Pine Barrens Zone Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, �. � Susan D. Windesheim SDW:jaw Pine Barrens Administator fig�baCM C=N\ M.LSE DENNISON SUILDING-12TH FL VETERANS MEMORIAL WCHWAY HAUPPAUGL LI.,NEW XORK 11780 (516) 360-4099 MUI-2:1/611W ■ r F r OREEIVMAN • PEDERSEN, INC. BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON,RA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELO.CT April 7 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO,FL Long Island Regional Planning Board H. Lee Dennison Building 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Commissioner Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings on _a 46.16 acre site. As estimated 29 acres will remain natural or vegetated. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon existing plans for the area. Please indicate how the project affects or is affected by such plans. Also, if there are any other comments or information you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions , please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : jw Enclosure ==5 WEST M e-iN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 [516] 587-5060 OREENMAN • PEOERSEN, INC. BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON,PA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELD,CT April 7 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO,FL Suffolk County Planning Department H. Lee Dennison Building 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Commissioner Re: Hamlet 0 Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings on-a 46.16 acre site. As estimated 29 acres will remain natural or vegetated. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon existing plans for the area. Please indicate how the project affects or is affected by such plans . Also, if there are any other comments or information you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : iw Enclosure 2.25 VVE 3T N'G IN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (516) 587-5060 r y GREENMAN • PECERSEN, INC. = BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL.MO JAMISON,PA MARLBOROUGH.MA WETHERSFIELO,CT April 7 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO,FL New York State Dept .Environmental Conservation Significant Habitat Unit Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, New York 12054-9767 Attention: Director Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings on _a 46.16 acre site. As estimated 29 acres will remain natural or vegetated. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon existing plans for the area. Please indicate how the project affects or is affected by such plans . Also, if there are any other comments or information you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GRE AN-PEDEMS—EN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : jw Encl :)sure 325 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (516] 587-5060 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 ( 516 ) 751-7900 (ext. 248) Lfta April 24, 1989 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner Mr. Joseph Colucci GPI, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 RE: Hamlet @ Cutchogue Dear Mr. Colucci: We have reviewed the Significant Habitat Program and the Natural Heritage Program files with respect to your request of February 21, 1989 regarding the above referenced action. We did not identify any potential impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern wildlife species, rare plant, animal or natural community occurrences, or other significant habitats. The absence of data does not necessarily mean that rare or endangered elements, natural communities or other significant habitats do not exist on or adjacent to the prpposed site, but rather that our files currently do not contairi any i4formation which indicates the presence of these. Our files are continually growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been conducted. For these reasons, we cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environmental assessment. If this proposed project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we can update this response. If we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address and telephone number. Sincerely, t ? S. Scheibel Senior Wildlife Biologist MSS:rr OREENMAN • PEOERSEN, IIVC. BABYLON,NY S-ri "' CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL.MO April 7 , 1989 JAMiSON,RA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSRELO,CT NORTH BRANCH,NJ Suffolk County Police Department ORLANDO.FL Planning and Research Section Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 Attention: Lieutenant Edmund Erickson Commanding Officer Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI Job No. 87398 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dear Lieutenant Erickson: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizen residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings (4 unit per building) on a 46.16 acre site. The project is expected to attract a population of 320. In-house burglar alarms and street-lighting systems are proposed. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact on your department. Please confirm that the project will be serviced by the Department and identify which precinct will provide patrols. Also, please include any comments or information that you feel are of importance. Your response will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, NMAN-PEDER INC. i Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : jw Enclosure 325 WELT MAIN STREET, BABYLON. NY 11702 (5161567-5060 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a C�DEPq/p��a �o<kcOV, PATRICK G.HALPIN DANIEL P GUIDO COUNTY EXECUTIVE POLICE COMMISSIONER POLICE DEPARTMENT April 14 , 1989 > Mr . Robert Pedneault Greenman Pedersen, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 Dear Mr . Pedneault: I am returning your letter of April 7 in which you request information for a draft environmental impact statement for a senior citizen' s residence in the hamlet of Cutchogue. The hamlet of Cutchogue is in the Town of Southold and police services are provided by the Town of Southold police Department. For further information you should contact Police Chief Harold Winters, Southold Town Police Headquarters, Main Road, Peconic, New York 11958 . Yours truly, W, Edmund M. Erickson, Lieutenant Commanding Officer Planning and Research Bureau EME: lg Enclosure YAPHANK AVENUE, YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 - (516)345-6000 OREENMAN • PECERSEN, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS BABYLON,NY ALBANY.NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON.RA April 7 , 1989 MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELD.CT NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO.FL Long Island State Park and Recreation Commission Belmont Lake State Park P .O. Box 247 Babylon, NY 11702 Attention: Regional Director Re: Hamlet III Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI Job No. 87398 --------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizens residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings (4 units per building) on a 46 .16 acres site. On-site recreation facilities are planned to serve the expected population of 320 and guests. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon nearby state recreation facilities. Also, if there are any additional comments or information that you feel are important, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in the, DEIS. If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, NMAN-P DER EN, INC. Robert dneault Project Engineer RP : jw Encl^sure 325 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (51 BJ 587-5060 OREENMAN • PEOERSEN, INC. BABYLON,NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON,RA MARLBOROUGH,MA April 7, 1989 WETHERSFIELD,CT NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO.FL LILCO/Eastern Suffolk Division Residential Services New Business Department 600 Doctor' s Path, Road #2 Riverhead, NY 11901 Attention: Division Manager Re: Hamlet 0 Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI Job No. 87398 --------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizens residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed development will include 160 units in 40 buildings (4 units per building) on a 46.16 acre site. As heat pumps are _ expected for heating and cooling, estimated total annual electric demand is 1800 mwh. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact upon LILCO. Please confirm that the site will be services by LILCO and the location of the nearest service . Also, if there are any comments or information that you feel are of importance, please feel free to include them. Your response will be included in the DEIS. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Z'ENMAN-PED N, INC. Robert Pednlault Project Engineer RP: jw i aclosure L15 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (51 SJ 5B7-5060 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ia�,cairo�r� # DOCTORS P A T H R I V E R H E A D, N E W Y O R K 1 1 9 0 1 Direct Dial Number: (516)548-7090 May 5, 1989 Greenman & Pedersen 325 W. Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Attn: Mr. Robert Pedneault Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue Gentlemen: In response to your letter dated April 7, 1989, LILCO provides the following: * Three phase electric facilities capable of providing service to this project, presently exists on School House Lane and Griffing Ave. We do not anticipate any problems providing electric service for your project at this time. * A gas moratorium presently exists east of the Town of Brookhaven line. In certain areas there exists spot availa- bility. If you desire natural gas service, please contact Mr. Joseph Rosato of our Market Services Department at 582-2900, making a formal application request. * Our gas and electric facilities will be extended and service provided in accordance with our filed tariffs and schedules, PSC-4 Gas/PSC-7 Electricity, in effect at the time service is required. In order for us to adequately design our gas and electric distribution facilities to provide service, it is urgent a letter be sent to LILCO incorporating the following: a) Main service equipment size for each building b) Voltage characteristics desired (120/208Y) (277/480Y) (120/240D) c) Service entrance locations (gas and electric) d) Total connected load, broken down into lighting, heating, air conditioning, processing equipment, etc. e) Site plan indicating all subsurface facilities(e.g. water, sewer, etc) f) Construction schedule with anticipated service requirement dates for each building g) Copy of filed map for plotting of utility easements FC-8689.3-SS Greenman & Pedersen Page 2 May 5, 1989 Upon receipt of the above requested information, we will be happy to forward specific proposals to provide service and the applicable charges involved, if any. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, Paul J. Walsh Commercial & Industrial Services New Business Department PJW/vn MAY 1989 4 GREENMAN • PECER8EN, INC. 'T BABYLON.NY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY.NY LAUREL.MO April 7 , 1989 JAMISON.PA MARLBOROUGH.MA WETHERSFIELD,CT NORTH BRANCH.NJ Cutchogue Volunteer Fire Department ORLANDO,FL New Suffolk Lane Box 930 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Attention: Chief Frances McCaffery Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI File No. 87398 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dear Chief McCaffery: Enclosed please find a location map and preliminary map of a proposed senior citizens residence in Cutchogue. We are currently preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for this project. The proposed site will include 160 units in 40 building (4 units per building) on a 46.16 acre site. This development is expected to attract 320 persons . In-house and smoke alarms and an on-site hydrant are planned. The structures are planned to be built utilizing flame retardant materials . It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact on your department. Please confirm that the site will be serviced by your department. Also, please indicate an estimated response time for AM and PM from the time of county activation to first due apparatus arrival. Also, if there are additional comments and information that you feel are of importance, please do not hesitate to include them. Your responses will be included in this DEIS. If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, PEE MAN-PErRN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP : jw Enclosure 325 WEFT MAIN STREET, SAISYLON, NY 11702 (.516] 587-50BC OREENMAN • PEOER8EN, IIVC. BABYLON,NY gpi CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL.MO JAMISON,PA MARLBOROUGH,MA April 10 , 1989 WETHERSRELO,CT NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO,FL Central Suffolk Hospital 1300 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Attn: President Re: Hospital Services and Occupancies for the Hamlet at Cutchogue Senior Citizens Center Environmental Impact Statement GPI Job No. 87398.00 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir: We are currently preparing an Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed 160 unit Senior Citizens Residence in Cutchogue. The development is within a reasonable distance to your facility and will be housing approximately 320 persons. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact on the hospital. Of particular interest is a brief list of the services, the number of beds , and the current and projected occupancy rates. Also, if there are any additional comments or information that you feel are of importance, please feel free to include them. Your responses will be included in the Statement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP:dd 325 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 (516) 567-5060 OREEIVMAIV • PEOERSEN, II-JC. SABYLON,NY 9W CONSULTING ENGINEERS ALBANY,NY LAUREL,MO JAMISON,PA MARLBOROUGH,MA WETHERSFIELD,CT April 10 , 1989 NORTH BRANCH,NJ ORLANDO,FL Eastern L. I . Hospital Association 201 Manor Place Greenport, New York 11944 Attn: President Re: Hospital Services and Occupancies for the Hamlet and Cutchogue Senior Citizens Residence Environmental Impact Statement GPI Job No. 87398 .00 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dear Sir: We are currently preparing an Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed 160 unit Senior Citizens Residence in Cutchogue. The development is within a reasonable distance to your facility and will be housing approximately 320 persons. It is the intent of this letter to solicit your input regarding this project and its impact on the hospital. Of particular interest is a brief list of the services, the number of beds, and the current and projected occupancy rates. Also, if there are any additional comments or information that you feel are of importance, please feel free to include them. Your responses will be included in the Statement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer RP:dd 325 WEST MAIN STREET, BABYLON, NY 11702 [51 B] 587-5060 g-7 M 6 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Information Services AM Wildlife Resources Center Delmar, New York 12054 April 28, 1989 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner Robert Pedneault Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 Dear Mr. Pedneault: We have reviewed the Significant Habitat Program and the Natural Heritage Program files with respect to the proposed Hamlet at Cutchogue residential development in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, N.Y. Enclosed is a computer printout which shows four rare plants that historically were found in the vicinity of the project. We recommend conducting a search to determine presence or absence of these species on the site if suitable habitat still exists. The State protection category is pending final promulgation of regulations. Our files are continually- growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been conducted. For these reasons, we can only provide data which have been assembled from our files. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or natural communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be re- quired for environmental assessment. This response applies only to known occurrences of rare animals, plants and natural communities and/or significant wildlife habitats. You should contact our regional offices(s), Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the address(es) enclosed for information regarding any regulated areas or permits that may be required (e.g. , regulated wetlands) under State law. If this project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response. If we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us. S' er ly, J 06W. Ozard Senior Wildlife Biologist Significant Habitat Unit Enc. cc: Reg. 2 New York Natural Heritage Program is supported in part by The Nature Conservancy lb 7 311 Ezz._;'F'&C0 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ,artro�ur� DOCTORS PATH RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 Direct Dial Number: 548-7090 April 27, 1989 Greenman-Pedersen Inc. 325 W. Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Attention: Robert Pedneault Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS LILCO Ref. #94795-940 Gentlemen: In response to your inquiry dated April 7, 1989, three phase, 13.2 kV overhead electric facilities capable of providing service to this project presently exist along the south side of Griffing Avenue. At this time, we do not anticipate any problem providing electric service to this project from these existing facilities. We shall be pleased to provide electric service in accordance with our filed tariff and schedule in effect at the time service is required. We are enclosing an application for electric service for non-residential customers to be completed by you for each building under construction and returned to this office. Upon receipt of these application forms, we shall prepare and forward to you our plans and costs, if any, applicable to this installation. As soon as a construction schedule is available, kindly forward a written notification to this office, in order to meet your present electric service date. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, Paul J. Walsh Commercial & Industrial Services New Business Department PJW/vn Enc. FC-8689.3-SS ��3g8 SEAN"hal New York State Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation dLong Island Region-Belmont Lake State Park,P.O Box 247, Babylon, NY 11702-0247 9 Phone:(516)669-1000 State Park Police:(516)669-2500 LL Orin Lehman,Commissioner Floyd Linton, NEW YORK STATE Ronald E Foley, Regional Director Commission Chairman April 28, 1989 Mr. Robert Pedneault Project Engineer Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Dear Mr. Pedneault: Re: Hamlet @ Cutchogue DEIS Senior Citizens Residence School House Lane, Cutchogue GPI Job No. 87398 We have received your correspondence regarding the above project. It does not appear that the project would have a direct impact on any of our facilities. Very truly yours, Richard C. French Sr. Administrative Assistant RCF:was An Equal Opportunity Employer APPENDIX H ARCHEOLOGICAL STUDY CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT (DOCUMENTARY SEARCH AND FIELD INSPECTION } THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE CUTCHOGUE SOUTHOLD TOWNSHIP SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORK ROBERT J . KALIN JULY 1989 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC . BOX 1522 , ROCKY POINT , NEW YORK 11778 --------------------- 17 ROSEVILLE AVE . ST . JAMES , NEW YORK 11870 -------------------- TEL : 516-744-8047 FAX 516-744-6617 9 �, �� • ,% ; ' Sacre earth ' • ', : ��� C e m t- \ o • • `moi • • ry�l• \ ' w411 ♦ �• trhogue • . ••• ]MO)iCT)AM 33 2900001 , _ •. FEETI- :. uteho e ' � � -Po I \77 B-M 32 • chogue `, Z • .,: • :.1 'North For - . C)" v .. � ,� 20 ,i'b `� o'i, Country ClubLLJ 25 r I E. o 41 00 �^ 72 ° 30, Km ' 711 2 420 000 FEEZ Mapped , edited , and publisned by the Geological Control b USC&GS - c� Y Topography from aerial photographs by Ke(sh Flot ter enc THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York ABSTRACT The Hamlet at Cutchogue is located north of Schoolhouse Lane in the Village of Cutchogue . The property is of generally low relief with an elongate depression and a small enclosed basin that at times holds standing water . The project area is located within a district of intensive prehistoric aboriginal habitation . The National Register of Historic Places site at Fort Corchaug , the Baxter Site and the Solecki Site are located within a short distance of the subject parcel . The subject parcel is well within the near- hinterlands of these well documented sites . It is in this surrounding area where special purpose camps and satellite sites are likely to be found . A subsurface testing program should be initiated to evaluate the potential for prehistoric evidence on the parcel . In regard to historic sites , a number of these , including the National Register of Historic Places site known as the Old House of Cutchogue ( 1660) , the Old Place ( 1680) , the Wickham house ( 1700) , and others are located within six- tenths of a mile of the center of the parcel . In addition , the pre-1800 Hargrave house and several mid-19th century vernacular farm houses , including the SPLIA cited and underscored Aldrich house (pre 1873) are located immediately adjacent to the subject parcel . Consequently , The Hamlet at Cutchogue site has potential for recovery of historic evidence related to early settlement and past farming activities . Further study in the form of subsurface testing should be conducted to evaluate the potential of this proposal for impact to both prehistoric and historic cultural evidence . rokdell r /9i9 ASI 1 1t1E HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York • �Rti 2y o Pt)nIFCT �. Ob '�► to 04 0 CUTCKOGUE oQ Figure 1 . Location map . ASI 2 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hamlet at Cutchogue is a 46 . 2 acre proposed development site located north of Schoolhouse Lane in the Village of Cutchogue , Town of Southold , Suffolk County , New York . An elongate depression trends across the central portion of the project . A small enclosed basin is located in the southwestern portion of the gully system which may have held standing water in the past . Several farm roads are evident within the property. Thev probably served as access roads during the period that the parcel was cultivated . Some are presently overgrown with brush . The project area is located within a district of intensive prehistoric aboriginal habitation . The National Register of Historic Places site at Fort Corchaug as well as several other well documented prehistoric sites are located within a short distance of the subject parcel . The proposed project is well within the foraging zones of these sites , an area where special purpose camps and satellite sites are likely to be found . In reference to historic places , a number of these , including the National Register of Historic Places site known as the Old House of Cutchogue ( 1649-1660) , the Old Place ( 1680) , the Wickham house ( c 1700) and others are located within a fraction of a mile of the parcel . In addition , the pre 1800 Hargrave house and several mid-19th century vernacular farm houses are found immediately adjacent to the subject parcel . One of these , the Aldrich-Kurczewski farm is recorded in the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities as an exceptional and very well preserved example of the type . The Hamlet at Cutchogue site has potential for recovery of both prehistoric and historic cultural evidence . Further research and study in the form of subsurface testing and analysis should be conducted to evaluate the potential impact of the project on both prehistoric and historic cultural evidence . ASI 3 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York CONTENTS ------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT PAGE ------------------------------------------------------------ MAP OF SUBJECT AREA ( 1'50% enlargement U . S . G . S . Southold Quad . 1956 ) i ABSTRACT 1 LOCATION MAP 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 PROJECT INFORMATION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 7 ALTERATIONS TO THE PROPERTY 9 DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH 10 HISTORICAL NOTES ON STUDY AREA 14 VISUAL INSPECTION 19 SUMMARY 21 SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 23 RECOMMENDATIONS 23 REFERENCES 24 MAP REFERENCES 27 MAPS FIGURES 31 ADDENDUM 45 ASI 4 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York PROJECT INFORMATION The Hamlet at Cutchogue is a proposed development site , consisting of 18 . 7 hectares (46 . 2 acres) and located north of Schoolhouse Lane in the Village of Cutchogue , Town of Southold , Suffolk County, New York . The plan calls for the construction of 160 housing units in 40 multiple unit structures , a clubhouse , recreation area , and access roads . A an approximately 1 .4 acre buffer area is planned for the northwestern corner . I ASI 5 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York !9 51 0/3 55wE O y" 20 / 1 . I y 0 -.7O• v.� 3 ioo �c i t Figure 2 . The Hamlet at Cutchogue proposed site ASI 6 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Topography The Hamlet at Cutchogue is in an area of generally little relief . Elevations range from less than 6 meters (20 feet ) to more than 11 meters (36 feet ) over the subject parcel . Topographically the parcel is dominated by a (now) dry- portion of the distal drainage system of West Creek . An elongate depression trending N 400 W cuts across the central portion of the project area for a distance of about 300 to 500 meters . Slopes in the vicinity of this feature range from 8-10 % ( percent grade) . To the east the parcel rises to slightly higher ground along Depot Lane , the site of several farms and residences , and to the west , approximating the position of the western property boundary, is the low divide between Downs Creek Drainage and West Creek . A small enclosed basin of less than six meters ( 20 feet) elevation and about 15 meters in diameter is located in the southwestern portion of the parcel . This may have held standing water at times of high-stand of the water table . Local informants report that at times of heavy rain a pond forms in the depression . In 1954 its immediate surroundings were the only wooded portion on the parcel . Geology The geological history of the subject parcel is closely related to the Wisconsin glaciation of the Southold area . During the Ronkonkoma advance of the Wisconsin ice sheet the subject area was covered by a massive ice sheet . During the warming period between that advance and the advance of the Harbor Hill ice sheet , the Cutchogue area was mantled by extensive outwash deposits of water borne sand and gravel (See also Fuller 1914) . Meltwaters cut and filled these deposits into a series of channels that later were inundated by rising sea water during the post glacial period . Those that intersected the shore line were later modified by ' long shore currents , drifting sand , tidal flow , etc . to form present day Little Creek , East Creek , Wickham Creek , West Creek , atnd Downs Creek . The drainage of West Creek, part of the earlier glacial channel , extends north across Main Street into the subject parcel . Soils The soils of the parcel are a mosaic-like pattern of Riverhead , Plymouth and Haven soils . The Plymouth and Riverhead components are associated within the more steeply sloping portions of the drainage gully of West Creek , while the areas of low relief are mantled in Haven soil . About 38% of the project area is Riverhead B and Plymouth C soils while ASI 7 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York 40 tit` i 1 Soil Map Soil patterns in vicinity of the subject parcel . After Warner , et . al . 1975 . (Ha A = Haven A soils , P1C =Plymouth C soils , Rd B = Riverhead B soils . ) ASI 7A THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York the remaining 62 percen.t of the parcel is Haven A soil . The Haven soils are well drained medium textured soils , formed in a loamy or silty mantle over stratified sand and gravel . These are some of the most productive soils in the county and their presence helps to explain the historical attraction of early settlers to the district (See Warner et . al . 1975 : 71 , Sheet 48 ) . The Haven series soils are suitable for many commonly grown crops . Uncultivated areas of this soil type generate a diverse natural vegetation . Prehistoric inhabitants may have been attracted to the area , in part , as a consequence of the soil productivity . Riverhead soils are moderately coarse textured , have moderate available moisture and low natural fertility . Drainage The project area is mostly well drained . However , there is a closed basin in the southwest corner of the parcel that is poorly drained . Vegetation The vegetation of the subject parcel , at the time of the field inspection ( July 1989) , was determined to consist of two botanical communities : former farm field and post agricultural forest . About 10% of the parcel is wooded and the rest ( 90%) is fallow or abandoned farm field and crop land . The vegetation of the open fields consists of various grasses and forbs common to this area . The wooded zone occupies the gully area and consists of various species common in a post-agricultural woodland . A partial list of species follows . Sylva Black Cherry Red Maple Field Cedar Shrub or Brush Bayberry Staghorn Sumac Multiflora Rose Vines Poison Ivy Dew Berry Virginia Creeper Forbs St . Johnswort Golden Rod ASI 8 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York Indian Hemp Milk Weed Grasses Little Bluestem Grass Timothy Foxtail Forest Zone The forest zone of the subject parcel is : Northeastern Oak-Pine Forest (Kuchler 1970) . Man-made Features Several farm roads are evident within the property. They probably served as access roads during the period that the parcel was cultivated . Some have been unused for several years and are presently overgrown with brush . Alterations Aside from clearing and farming the land and providing access roads to the fields for agricultural purposes , few significant alterations were observed . Previous Surveys None are known to have been conducted . ASI 9 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH Site Files and Known Early Historic Sites Prehistoric Gonzales and Rutch ( 1979) list this area as archaeologically sensitive as a result of its location in a zone of "intensive aboriginal habitation" (Gonzales and Rutch 1979 : 13) . Parker records a number of sites within this general area . The most well known is the fortified village site , sometimes known as Fort Corchaug (National Register of Historic Places ) , located on the east side of Fort Neck , and a village site near the shore , east of Cutchogue (Parker 1920 : 698 ) . These sites are respectively about 2 . 2 km ( 1 . 4 miles ) and 2 . 8 km ( 1 . 8 miles ) from the center of the project site . The Baxter Site , a prehistoric residence site , (discovered by Ralph Solecki in 1938 ) is located about 2 km ( 1 . 25 miles ) south-southwest of the subject parcel (See Ritchie 1965 : 166 ) . The Solecki Site , a burial or cemetery site of the Orient Culture , was discovered by Ralph Solecki in 1960 east of Downs Creek near the shore , .not far from Kimogener Point , about 2 . 2 km ( 1 . 4 miles ) south of the project area ( See Ritchie 1965 : 174) . Other well known sites occur along the west shore of Mud Creek and the east side of Cutchogue Harbor less than 3 km ( 1 . 9 miles ) southeast of the project site . Historic An early windmill and the Cutchogue Meeting House were located along Main Street just 0 . 7 km ( 4/10 of a mile) southeast of the project site (See Moore 1797 map) . The Old House (Budd and Horton 1649-1660) , The Old Place (Wells 1680 ) , the Wickham House ( c 1700) , Wines-Horton-Slater House ( c 1750) and the site of the Wells home ( 1753) are all located within 1 km ( 6/10 of a mile) of the center of the subject parcel (See Map of Historic Sites of Southampton Town Prior To 1815 , Southold Bicentennial Committee) . A pre 1800 frame structure built on a rock foundation , and barn dating to about 1860 (See SPLIA file Cu 105) , presently owned by Alexander Hargrave is located on immediately adjacent property northwest of the subject parcel . The Aldrich- Kurczewski house , constructed prior to the last quarter of the 19th century ( the earliest known owner was George Aldrich) is located immediately adjacent to the subject parcel . Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities ( SPLIA) files indicate it is . . . "an exceptional example of the mid-19th century farm. The farmhouse and all ASI 10 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York barns and out buildings appear to be in an almost unaltered state . " (See SPLIA Files Southold , Cu 93 : 18 , also See Addendum) . The Conklin-Gorman house is adjacent to the subject parcel on the north . It was the second Post Office in Cutchogue and appears on the Chase 1858 and Beers 1873 maps (See SPLIA file in Addendum) . The F . M. Mc Carthy house , another mid 19th century farm house continues to stand to the northwest of the subject parcel , along the east side of--Alvahs Lane , within 1 km of the Hamlet at Cutchogue site ( See SPLIA Cu 88 and Cu 89 ) . A number of other houses listed in the SPLIA files are within a short distance of the project ( See SPLfA Map and Insert in Addendum) . MAP REFERENCES 1 . The_ English Pilot , Fourth Book , 1689 , by John Thornton . This relatively crude map of the area does depict the major features of the north fork , such as : Robins Island , Hog Neck , Little Hog Neck (not named) , and with some imagination , Broadwater Cove , East Creek , Wickhams Creek and West Creek . Cutchogue is not indicated . See Map Figure 1 . 2 . The New England Coasting Pilot , 1734 , Southack . This map indicates the presence of Southold Village and (by house symbols ) the location of East Cutchogue to the east of Little Hog Neck , near Hog Neck Bay . Further residential symbols occur on the north shore facing the Sound . See Map Figure 2 . 3 . The William Fadden Maw of 1779 is not as accurate as the Southack map and tends to represent the coastline rather fancifully . Its function was apparently not for coastal piloting , but probably for general informational or land advertisement use . It does represent interior features such as roads and village centers in somewhat more detail than the earlier maps which emphasized maritime travel . Southold is noted , as is Hog Neck . Cutchogue , a thriving community by this date , is not noted on the map . See Map Figure 3 . 4 . Plan of Lona Island in New York Government . North America . The scale is 6 miles to an inch . British Map of Long Island , Revolutionary War Period . No Date . No Author noted . On file at SUNY , Stony Brook Historic Map Collection . This map was carefully drawn and the outline of the Island and the main drainage systems are close to modern representations . If the increments figured along the length of the map are in inches , as one suspects , then the map is quite accurate for cartography of its time . It represents the distance from Old Man ' s (Mount Sinai ) to Horn Tavern as about 13 miles , while the actual distance , using contemporary ASI 11 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York topographic maps , is closer to 10 miles . This map is very similar in certain respects to the Fadden Map . It may have been used as the pattern from which the Fadden Map was drawn , and may predate that map . It correctly represents the major coastline features . No indications of structures or cultural features are indicated in the study area . See Map Figure 4 . 5 .--' The Townships of New York State were mapped in 1797 . The 1797 Survey of Southold Township , was prepared under the supervision of Thomas Moore . This map clearly delineates the shoreline and Main Street of late 18th century Southold . Four wind mills , a meeting house , a school house and a residence are indicated along Main Street . No residences or roads are indicated for the subject parcel . See Map Figure 5 . 6 . Burr Ma_p. of 1829 notes the location of Main Street and a cluster of houses on both sides of the road in the vicinity of present-day East Cutchogue . A smaller cluster of buildings was located on the north side of the road in an area .just north of Wickhams Creek in what is now considered Cutchogue proper . No residences are noted in the vicinity of the subject parcel . See Map-Figure 6 . 7 . The area was surveyed by the U . S . Coastal. Survey in 1836 . This generally excellent map indicates the location of houses . churches , barns , field systems , vegetation patterns , etc . This map provides information about the location of East Creek and Wickhams Creek which were surrounded by marsh and lightly wooded areas . Most of the rest of the district was cleared land , including the subject parcel . Several houses are noted along the north side of Main Street including a church, probably the present day Presbyterian Church . What appears to be the A. R . Tuthill house is located along New Suffolk Road . Another house is found to the east , just north of Wickhams Creek . No structures are noted in the area north of Main Street in the vicinity of the subject parcel . See Map Figure 7 . 8 . The Travellers. Map of 1852 has generalized information concerning the location of roads and residences . It provides a suggestion of a cluster of houses without indicating the exact location of individual residences . The map figures a cluster west of the intersection of present day Depot Lane and Main Street . The rail line is indicated as well as a house along the west side of Depot lane . This may be the Aldrich house which is more precisely located in later maps . There are no indications of structures in the actual area of the subject parcel . See Map Figure 8 . ASI 12 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York 9 . The Chase Map of 1858 provides some information on the residents and property owners . This map documents the dominance of the Tuthill family in early Cutchogue . Few other surnames other than (J . T . ) Gould are noted in the area . The T . Conklin house is noted but not attributed to an owner , while the Aldrich house is not represented . A number of residences and shops are indicated along both sides of Main Street . No structures are noted on the subject parcel . See Map-Figure 9 . 10 . The Beers Comstock and Cline Map of 1873 . This map clearly notes the major land holders in the area east of Alvahs Lane and west of Depot Lane , north of Main Street ; the area within which the subject parcel is sited . G . Aldrich is noted as owner-resident on a parcel in the southeast corner of this area . We can presume that Aldrich , T . J . Conklin , and N . Champlin were probable owners of part or all of the subiect parcel at about this period . No _tructures or residences are noted for the subject parcel . ee Xap-Figure 10 . 11 . Belcher_ Hyde Ma_p of 1909 indicates the presence of the Aldrich property , house and barn . The property to the south was that of J(as ) Wickham . C . Williamson owned adjoining Property to the west . Williamson ' s and Aldrich ' s property adioined the Dayton Estate to the west . The parcel that comprises the present Hamlet at Cutchogue probably consists of Part of both the G . Aldrich Estate and the C . Williamson Property . See Map-Figure 11 . 12 . Atlas of Suffolk County . Dolph and Stewart 1929 , indicates little change over the 1909 map . The Aldrich parcel is listed as the Aldrich Estate . We may assume that by this date George Aldrich was deceased . Wickham and Dayton continue to own large portions of adjoining property . -Notablethe increase in Polish and other Slavic surnames in the record . Apparently the period between 1909 and 1929 was one of intensive acquisition of property by relatively recent immigrants to Cutchogue . See Map-Figure 12 . 13 . U . S . Army Map Service , Southold Quadrangle , 1947 . This map depicts little change for the subject area . It notes the elongate depression that dominates the topography of the subject parcel . The presence of a new school , a new church ( Our Lady of Ostrabrama ) , and a cemetery are all noted in the area immediately surrounding the subject property . No structures are depicted within the subject parcel . See Map- Figure 13 . ASI 13 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York 14 . U__ S . Geological Survev , Southold Quadrangle . 1956 . In the period after 1947 North Street and Schoolhouse Lane were constructed . This road served several new structures located west of the school . Sometime after 1956 Griffin Street was cut through just west of North Street . This road provides access to the subject property . More recently a trailer park and further development for homesites has occurred along School House lane . No structures are noted within the subject parcel . See Map-Figure 14 . HISTORIC NOTES ON THE STUDY AREA EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTHOLD Sometime prior to 1640 , a band of Puritan colonists . led by the Reverend John Youngs , set out from New Haven and settled "Yennecock" , a place known by the English as Southold . The place included "all that tract of land situate lying and being the Eastward end of Long Island and hounded with the River called in the English toung the Leading Kreek . in the Indian tong Pauquaconsuk , on the west , To and with Plum Island on the East . . . .with the Sound called the 'Forth Sea on the North , and with , a River or arme of the sea on the East . . . on ye South , together with . . . all necks of '_ands meadows . Islands . . . . rivers Kreeks with timber , woods and woodlands , fishing fouling , hunting . . . . . . (Quoted from Indian Deed of 1665 where-in forty-three Indians confirmed the Town ' s right to the several tracts involved which had been "previously purchased procured and paid for of the schaems and Indians our ancestors " (Craven 1906 : 14 ) . In his "History of Southold" , Rev . Epher Whitaker , notes that "the settlement here was so old in the Autumn of 1640 that Richard Jackson . who had cultivated his land and built his house and other improvements here , desired at that time to sell , and did sell his dwelling house , and all his other improvements , as well as his land within the Town , only four days after the date of the organization of the First Church of Southold ( Whitaker 1881 : 41 ) . One wonders if the Reverend Whitaker had not confused a deed from James Farret to Richard Jackson dated August 15 , 1640 in which a parcel of about 150 acres of land was deeded to Richard Jackson by the Earl of Sterling ' s Deputy ( James Parrett ) for a " certain some of money to me band paid . . . . . ( and) . . a pep . of corne every yeare for the fifty acres ; and also . . . . a penny an acre for all the hundred acres before mentioned . " The description of the land does indicate that some of it may have been improved land and thus had been occupied earlier than August 1640 . Thus , this supports the contention of Whitaker that Southold and (not Southampton ) is the oldest town on Long Island . ASI 14 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York THE DIVIDENDS At a Town Meeting held November 20 , 1661 , it was decided that all common lands at Oysterponds (Orient ) . Corchaug ( Cutchogue ) , Mattatuck (Mattituck) and Occabauck (Aquebogue-- lands west of Mattituck to the Brookhaven Line ) be divided into lots so as to encourage development of outlying lands and at the same time providing that the common land should continue to be used as common pasturage . It seemed convenient to make three great divisions of land . One of these . east of the settlement and extending to Orient was known as Oysterponds . much larger "Dividend" lying to the west of this was known as the Corchaug Dividend , which extends to Canoe Place at Mattituck . The Occabauck Dividend was divided into three areas , one in the east known as the first Division in Occabauck and the Second and Third Dividends to the west , all the way to Wading River (Craven 1906 : 28-29 ) . At the time of the great division there were according to Craven ( op . cit . : 29 ) , about 51 heads of households in Southold . There were 38 Lots in Occabauck and nineteen owners . The Lots were large , extending from Sound to Ba,, . forty rods wide ( 660 feet ) and each containing two- hundred and fifty acres or more . Those settlers allotted lots in Occabauck were : William Wells ( 3 lots ) . John Budd ( 4 lots ) . John Swazey ( 4 lots ) , Joseph Horton ( 4 lots ) . William Halliock ( Hallock) was listed as being allotted 2 lots . the Corchaug Lots did not extend from Sound to Bay but were divided by the Kings Highway . Those north of the llip.hwav ( in the area of the Hamlet at Cutchogue) were about 30 rods wide ( 495 feet ) and tapered to the Sound and about 100 to 120 acres each . South of the highway , the land of the Corchaug Dividend lies in six large "necks" which were separated by creeks opening from the Bay: the most easterly is Poole ' s Neck , and toward the west-- Robin ' s Island Neck . Corchaug Neck , Fort Neck . Pessapunk Neck and Reeves Neck . The Corchaug and Fort Necks were the home ground of the local Indians . On Corchaug Neck was the site of their village and on the other--appropriately called Fort Neck--they built a stockade or fort where they would retire with the women and children . in time of conflict . A hollow in the ground , some three or four rods ( 50 feet ) across , surrounded by traces of an embankment still marks the site of the fort on the east side of the neck , near the creek that separates it from Robins Island Neck (See Craven 1906 ) . The settlers found the necks --for the most part-- already cleared land . Since the land was level and tillable and needed only plowing , while surrounding wooded land had to be cleared---a very laborious process- , the land on the Necks was very valuable and it quickly became cut up into small twenty acre lots . For many years a twenty acre lot in this ASI 15 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York "Old Indian Field" or Corchaug Broad Field , as it was called , was more valuable than hundreds of acres of woodland ( See Craven 1906 ) . CUTCHOGUE The name Corchaug refers to both the prehistoric native American residents and to the tract of land on which they lived . According to Tooker the term means the "principal Place or home ground" ( Tooker 1961 : 58 ) . This was the name ( Corchaug ) they gave to the neck that lies just to the south of the present village of Cutchogue . To the west , on an adjoining neck of land ( now known as Fort Neck) they built a -.nlisaded enclosure to which they retired with their women and children when they were threatened by enemies . On Corchaug -Neck were also located other sites and a burial place . Fort Corchaug was well known during the contact period and early historic times and many of the early c : anists must have visited the place . Cutchogue was the first of Southold ' s colonies , it having been settled in 1660 . The Old House in Cutchogue , tiuilt in 1649 by John Budd ( in Southold ) , was moved -- probably by ox cart--to , Cutchogue in 1660 . The house was owned by the Horton Family and later , during the Revolutionary War , it was the home of the Tory Supervisor , Parker Wickham. In 1680 the son of William Wells built a house Lust south of Dain Street which survives to this day as "Ihe Old Place " (See Map of the Historic Sites of Southold Town Prior to 1815 . Southold Bicentennial Committee , Southold , New York) . The settlers used Little Hog Neck as common grazing ground . Early in the village history they concentrated their agricultural activities on the necks of land that were fertile , well watered , and less heavily wooded ( or non—wooded) than the lots in the interior . Thus the earliest homes appear to have been concentrated close to the King ' s Highway (Main Street ) between Moores Lane and New Suffolk Road , just a short distance south of the subject parcel . EARLY HIGHWAYS Very soon after 1640 , a highway was laid out from Southold Village westward to Cutchogue and beyond to the head of Peconic Bay , to meet a highway from Southampton . This road was known as the King ' s Highway . Since it was the main traffic corridor along the interior , it was the site of most of the early construction of houses and shops in the Cutchogue area . In time , it cut across the entire length of the island . In some places on the island ( such as in Brooklyn ) it is still called Kings Highway . In 1655 , the ASI 16 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York Brookhaven settlement , which adjoined Southold on the west at Setauket ( there was no Riverhead until after the Revolutionary War) was established and a "Setacut Road" was built through the woods soon after that date , to that settlement . This latter road was to become the North Road . A record of its pathway is preserved in Liber A , p . 142 , ^uffolk County Deeds . . . an "Act of the Govern ' t Councill and Representatives of the Colony of N Yorke made in ye second veare of reign of our sovergn Lady Anne" ( 1703 ) . . . . for ye id'ring out Regulating clearing and preserving publick common hi-gh ways throughout ye sd Colony" . . . . . . " The high way from ve towne of Southold to ye westward farms on ye north side to to ve usuval road to Mattatuck and soe on ye northside of ye :-lord in ve way lately marked out to ye usual road leading to Richard llowells and from thence in ye usual road to ye beach and so on ve beach to ye fresh pond and to ye place called wading river" Thus we can assume that by the early part of the 18th Centlry the land that was to become the Hamlet at Cutchogue Tas Part of a thriving settlement with several homes . and was +jell served by public roads and by sheltered waterways . THE ALDRICH FAMILY From several sources , we know that the Aldrich family , rrobable first settlers and early owners of much of the subiect parcel , were early residents of the Town . The first mention of the Haldrich (Aldrich) name occurs in a 1683 rate list for the Town . In it Peter Haldrich (Aldrich) is listed . [ "A rate list for 1683 lists the following names : William Reeves . Thomas Tuston, Theophilus Curwin , Thomas Mapps , James Reeves , Thomas Terril , Peter 11aldriag (Aldrich) , Thomas Osman , William Haliock , Thomas Haliock , John Swazey, Joseph Swazey" (Craven 1906 : 68-69) . ] Teter may have arrived from the New Haven Colony or from England sometime after 1662 . By 1683 he was a tax-paying member of the colony . Sometime prior to 1683 he had married one of the daughters of John Swazey and taken up residence , Probably on a parcel originally allotted to John Swazey and noted as the second or double lot of John Swazey in the first dividends . We know that John Swazey did not live on that lot--he resided on a lot further west--and his will , drawn in 192 does not list this lot ---thus we may assume that sometime prior to 1692 he had sold or given this parcel to his son-in-law , Peter Aldrich . It is likely that Peter was t*-c first to clear and build a home there . Peter Aldrich died soon after Swazey ' s death in 1692 . The Aldrich family continued to reside in the western end of Southold , west of Howards Creek in Mattituck . In time , members of the Aldrich ASI 17 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York clan became scattered throughout Southold . George Aldrich , a scion of the family , moved east to Cutchogue to purchase land sometime in the mid-19th century . Sometime after 1858 and before 1873 (probably about 1866 ) Aldrich bought a parcel of land west of Depot Lane in Cutchogue where he established a general farm. HISTORY OF SUBJECT PARCEL The Wells family may have been the earliest owners of tht• Parts of the subject parcel . William Wells was an early resident of the Town ; his son built the Old Place in 1680 on the south side of Mains Street . Another Wells owned a house at the corner of Present-day Depot Lane and Main Street ( now jemolished ) . We know that the original lots north of the I'ighwav were about 495 feet ( about 150 meters ) wide and tarered to the Sound . If Wells held more than one lot as is likely , this area , measured west from the site of the Wells rouse at the corner of Depot Lane and Main Street would have in� luded part of the subject parcel . Thus it is possible t e Iiamlet at Cutchogue Parcel was first owned by the 'V,'F•11s family . We can assume that the 1753 Wells residents '. and their neighbors to the west ) probably cleared and farmed the land north of Main Street . There is unfortunately little kirm evidence for events of this period , and we can only assume that there was a good deal of buying , selling and tradiniz- of land in that early period . About 85 years later ( 1838 ) we can confirm , through documentary evidence , that the srea both north and south of the highway was cleared land . By about 1844 the Long Island Rail Road began service to the district . Access to the rail road opened vast markets in the urbanized western portions of the island to local farmers and far ranging adjustments in the local economy to the new agricultural opportunities . No longer was it necessary to emphasize subsistence-type farming , and safely stored agricultural products such as wool , flax and grains . With the rail line near-by perishable crops such as -vegetables , root crops , eggs and meats could be grown and •iuickly shipped to the urban areas with good profit . Thus lands suitable for such agriculture -- intensive cash crop farming , particularly north of Main Street near the rail line , were purchased by this new breed of cash crop agriculturist . One of the earliest families to settle in the area along Depot Lane , north of Main Street , was the Conklins . who may have purchased land from earlier Wells or Tuthill proprietors in the district . Conklin ' s farm house is _ Dcated northeast of the subject parcel . Sometime between 1860-1870 , George Aldrich , a scion of one of the first settlers of the Township , purchased land along Depot Lane south of the T . J . Conklin farm . He farmed the level Productive soils along Depot lane for nearly five decades . We know that the farm continued in operation under George ASI 18 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York Aldrich ' s management until at least the first decade of the '0th century . By the third decade of this century the property was listed as part of the George Aldrich Estate ( See °ap-Figure 12 ) . The estate was divided up among heirs , and the farm as well as a substantial amount of the land was inherited by George Young . Portions of the original farm may have been sold at this time by other heirs . We presume that the western part of the Aldrich farm became a significant portion of the present Hamlet at Cutchogue property . Other elerients may have come from the Willamson and Dayton estates . Mr . Kurczewski , a Polish immigrant . first settled in nhiladelohia and later moved to Cutchogue where he met his wife , married , and found employment as a farm laborer on the fleet Estate . Later , he worked for Mr . George Aldrich as a field hand and teamster on the Aldrich farm , during the earl), -,art of the century . fie continued on after the death of Mr . Aldrich . while it was managed by Mr . Young . Kurczewski ' s 7aup-:hter . Bertha , remembers the place as a child , where her worked and where she sometimes accompanied him on his ore_ . According to her , it was managed as a general farm . ":r father worked the fields with horse-drawn machinery . cowl were raised , as well as field crops grown , such as r•otatoes and cabbages . Young , who had other lands and wished to sell the Aldrich property . encouraged Kurczewski to buy the farm. According to Bertha , his daughter , Kurczewski , though he loved the place , could not afford it at that time . i- ventually . the farm was sold to the Sinuta family who had another farm in Orient where they resided . According to Bertha Kurczewski , they did not live on it or work it . but continued to live in East Marion . A number of families r_-rated the farm house from the Sinutas over a period of rears . At one time a Mr . Baxter lived there and later it was used as the residence and office of a physician -- Dr . Linowitz . Kurczewski continued to work on the farm and lease some of the farm land over this period . Around 1940 , at the urgings of the Sinuta family , who were eager to sell , Mr F:urczewski purchased the property which has been in his family since that time . At the present . Miss Bertha K rczeiaski is the owner . She proudly claims that she maintains the house and buildings , as well as a substantial .^_arden and parts of the surrounding property by her own labor . (B . Kurczewski , pers . comm . July 1989 ) . VISUAL INSPECTION A visual inspection was conducted in July 1989 . At that time a videotaped record of the inspection was produced . _:lis is available from Archaeological Services Incorporated . Most of the study area is crop land or former crop land . A brushy gully extends through much of the central portion of the subject parcel . The vegetation in this area suggests ASI 19 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York that at times it may hold standing water . The slopes near this feature are relatively steep and the soil here is gravelly . Several farm access roads and former road traces were noted . No standing structures were observed . Dense brush and thickets of Bittersweet and Poison Ivy prevented closer inspection of deeper portions of the gully . ASI 20 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York SUMMARY The Hamlet at Cutchogue proposed development site , is an 18 . 7 hectares (46 . 2 acres ) parcel located north of Schoolhouse Lane in the Village of Cutchogue , Town of Southold , Suffolk County , New York . The subject property is of generally low relief . An elongate depression trending N 400 W cuts across the central portion of the project area for a distance of about 300 to 500 meters . A small enclosed basin of less than six meters ( 20 feet ) elevation and about 15 meters in diameter is located in the southwestern portion of the parcel . This may hold standing water at times . The soils of the parcel are a mosaic-like pattern of Riverhead . Plymouth and Haven soils . About 38% of the project area is Riverhead B and Plymouth C soils while the remaining 62 percent of the parcel is Haven A soil . The project area is mostly well drained . However , there is a closed basin in the southwest corner of the parcel that is poorly drained . The vegetation , at the time of the field inspection ( July 1989 ) , was determined to consist of two botanical communities : former farm field and post agricultural forest . About 10% of the parcel is wooded and the rest ( 90%) is fallow or abandoned farm field and crop land . The vegetation of the open fields consists of various grasses and forbs common to this area . The wooded zone occupies the gully area and consists of maple and cherry and other species common in a post-agricultural woodland . Several farm roads are evident within the property . They probably served as access roads during the period that the parcel was cultivated . Some are presently overgrown with brush . The project area is located within a district of intensive aboriginal habitation . The National Register of Historic Places site at Fort Corchaug as well as several other well documented prehistoric sites are located within a short distance of the subject parcel . In terms of historic sites , a number of these , including the National Register of Historic Places site known as the Old House of Cutchogue , and several others of near contemporary age are located within a kilometer of the parcel . In addition , a pre 1800 house and several mid-19th century vernacular farm houses are located immediately adjacent to the subject parcel . One of these , the Aldrich-Kurczewski farm is recorded in the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities as an exceptional and very well preserved example of the mid-19th century farm . ASI 21 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York There is little documentary evidence for the subject parcel before 1797 . However by this date we can document the Presence of a number of windmills , a school and a meeting house within a short distance of the subject parcel . No structures are indicated within the study area from documentary evidence . Part of the subject parcel may have L een originally part of the Wells lot . The Wells family had a house on the corner of Depot Lane and Main Street in 1753 . -j4 1836 most of the district had been cleared of woodland and !--u'+" to the plow . We can assume that most or all of the -ubiect parcel was cleared land . and part of the Tuthill or familia farms at this date . Intensive cash crop began soon after the adient of the railroad in 1844 . _'aszure lands were converted into crop lands . Prior to 1? : 8 , the Conklin family , followed by the Aldrich family , �- (_.rchased land for such farming along Depot Lane . near the ce: ter of Cutchogue and close to the rail line . The subiect :.:cel wzis at that time part of several properties which mai- included the Aldrich . Champlin and Conklin farms . By _ . 7 . s -veral other farms had been established in the -iclnity . Earl- in the 20th century some of these were •-urch3sej by wealthy businessmen from urban areas to the west _c,,- _ r-:cuiation or to develop as model farms or as country states . The Dayton Estate west of the Aldrich farm may have ceer. in this category . Changes in farming and economics Drought changes to the district . numbers of Poles and other = livic immigrants settled in the area between 1900 and 1930 . finer - generally were excellent horsemen and teamsters , were knowleogeable and familiar with crop farms , and were �e���id :ble and hard working . They quickly rose from farm 1 -corers to farm owners . Most of the earlier Aldrich . .-onki n and Champlin farms were taken over by these 20th : entur- farmers . During this period , changes in the economy in farming management encouraged farmers to dispose of less productive farm plots and concentrate resources on large more Productive acreages . As a consequence , a number of lots were sold off or left fallow . These parcels were to become Rv3ilable for development later in the century . No structure sues are documented within the subject parcel . ASI 22 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT Prehistoric The subiect parcel is in a general area of intensive aboriginal activity . Several large , well documented sites are found within a half-hour walk of the subject parcel . Thus according to present archaeological models , it is located -veil w-1thin the normal activity zone ( or near hinterland ) of mor-: than one Prehistoric residence site . These hinterland areas were used for hunting , exploitation of natural . mineral . and Plant resources , and siting of special purpose ans satellite campsites . Modern archaeological theory underscores the importance of these "off site " activity zones and satellite camps in developing a more realistic . complete , uncerstanding of the culture . settlement Patterns . and adantat_ons of prehistoric native Americans . The Hamlet at :_ etch ue Parcel has potential for recovery of prehistoric = ultu_ al evidence due to its Proximity to prehistoric coastal _ Stu2rr ne residence basas . the presence of an enclosed �.hich may have held standing water in the vast . and i-- Lronmental Variations which enhance exploitation of game . neral and Plant resources . �! , _ toric Though no structures were documented for the parcel . it s Ln ?n area intensively used for over three centuries . _ cuthern Portions of the parcel closer to Main Street were nrobabiy cultivated by early settlers who were allotted rroPerty along Main Street . Nineteenth century farmers were active west of Depot Lane . The parcel has potential for recovery of historic evidence related to past farming activities . such as field lines . ditch and mound boundaries . and possible outlying structure sites . RECOMMENDATIONS Further study in the form of subsurface testing should c.e conducted to evaluate the potential of this proposal for impact to both prehistoric and historic cultural evidence . ASI 23 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York REFERENCES Bayles , Richard M . Historical_ and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk_ County , W . A . Overton . Port Jefferson , New York Cra .:e:l Charles E . ( Rev . ) -'+ - A History of Mattituck , Long Island , New York Published by the author . X'attituck , New York. Pleistocene geology of eastern Long Island . New York : Amer . Jour . Sc-i_._. Vol 262 . pp 355- '7 (, !?_ chard Foster 7 Glacial and Pleistoc_e_ne Geology . John Wile Sons . New York �vron . 1 . The Geology of Long Island , New York . United States Geol . Survey Prof . Paper ft 82 . U . S . Printing Office . Wash . D . C . =—:lzales . Ellice B and Ed S . Rutsch Suffolk County Cultural Resources Inventory . Suffolk County Arch . Assoc . . Drawer AR . Stony Brook . New York - orgensen . Niel A Sierra Club Naturalist ' s Guide_ to Southern- New Engl_and_, Sierra Club Books , San Francisco Ca . F•:alin . Robert J . Archaeology of Glacial Kettle Holes in North Central Suffolk County , New York . The Bull . and_ Jour_ of_ Arch ._ for New York State.. No . 86 pp 31-36 . New York State Arch . Assoc . . Rochester . Ka_ in . Robert J . and Kent Lightfoot In i,ress ) The Remsen Hill Site , :`Mount Sinai , New York :A Preliminary Excavation . The_ bull__ and Jour ._ of Arch . for New York Stat.e_, :yew York State Arch . Assoc . . Rochester . %alin . Robert J . , Kent Lightfoot and James Moore ASI 24 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York - `�8') Soil Patterns and Prehistoric Sites on Long Island , New York . Sub to Man in the Northeast, Albany , New York F_uchler . A . W . Potential_ 'natural V_getationy. In : The National Atlas of the United States . U . S . Department of the Interior , Washington , D . C . pp . 89-91 . czewsb:i , Bertha Personal Communication . Lives on Depot Lane (:utchogue . �.t:tfoot . Kent : Robert Kalin . Owen Lindauer and Linda Wicks � - Coastal New York Settlement Patterns . Man in Northeast . No . 30 pp 59-82 . ither . Fredrick G . The Refugees of 1776 from Long Is"land to Connecti_cut .- J . B . Lyon Co . . Albany . New York. . :..=.namon . Franc !s 8 ' Discovering sites unseen . In : Advance_s- in Arc.haeolo_gical Method andr _ Theoy,_ ed : Michael Schiffer , pp 223-229 . Vol . 7 . Academic Press . -New York . ^. _ e . Jack Regional sampling in archaeological survey: The statistical perspective . In : Advances_ in Archaeological Method. and Theory, Ed : Michael Schiffer , pp 289-386 , Vol . 6 . Academic Press , New York . Paimer . E . Lawrence F"ieldbook of Natural History1 Whittlesey House . McGraw-Hill Book Company , New York 664 pp . - artier . Arthur C . The Ar"chaeoical History of New York_ Part 2 . New York State Museum Bulletin Nos . 237 , 238 . Univ . of the State of New York . N . Y . State Museum. Albanv . New York . •_,ttie . Donald Culross A Natural History of Trees . Second Edition . Houghton Mifflin Company . Boston , Mass . ASI 25 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold , New York Pelletreau , W . S . 18`. 7 Early_ Long_ Island_ Wills_. F . P . Harper , Publisher . New York A H_ist_ory of Lon-a Isl-and_, Vol . I and II . Lewis Publishing Co . , New York City , N . Y . 'Nathaniel S . A History of Long I.sla_nd_, In Two Parts . Robert Carter Publishers , 58 Canal Street , New York , and 56 Market Street , Pittsburg , Pa . i, t _ hle . V, illiam A . The Archaeol_ogir of New York State_, American Museum of Natural History , Natural History Press , Garden City , N . Y . or the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities = - - General Files of Cutchogue Area , Thompson House . !:,etauket . New York :, _thDld Bicentennial Committee % ! a.p_ of_ H-istoric Sites of. Southampton Town. Prior To_ 181 ., Town Hall , Southold , New York ihomnson , Benjamin F . Histor-y of Long Island , II Edition , Vol I . II , III , French and Company , New York ; Re- published 1962 , Ira Friedman . Port Washington , New York . histpry of Long Island._,. An Account of t_h.e Discove_ry and. Settlement_,. with other Impprtant and_ Interesting_ Matters to the Present Time. E . French and Co . . New York 1839 Tooker . William. W . -'111 Indian Place. 'dames_ on Long_ Is_l.and_,_ Reprinted 1962 , Ira Friedman , Port Washington , New York :.rrer . John , et . al . - 'i Soil Survev of Suffolk County. New York , U . S . Dept . Agricul . . Soil Conserv . Serv . , Wash . D . C . , 20250 ASI 26 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York Whittaker . Epher (Rev . ) 1>?t<1 H_ist_ory of Southol.d,_ its First Century,._ Printed for the Author . Southold . New York . �•'Yatt . Ronald J . - 977 The Archaic on Long Island . Annals of the New York Academy of_ Sciences 288 : 400-410 . MAPS Anon Flan of Long bland in Net: York Government . 'North America . British Revolutionary War Era Map . No date , no author . Scale Six miles to the inch . ..:gid re ' John Sur_vev of Southampton_ Town_ Southampton . New York . On File : SUNY . Stony Brook , Historical Map Collection . _easchamns . William vap o.f. the Territorial Divisions_ of the Aborigines of ;dew York,. circa 1_6.00i Univ , of State of New York , Wm. M . Beauchamps : 1899 Beers . F . W . 1873 Atlas of Long Is_land_.t_ F .W . Beers Publishing Co . Brooklyn . N . Y . Belcher and Hyde 11,09 Atlas of Suffolk County_. Long Island,. Sound_ Shore, Belcher Hvde ,_ Vol 2 . 1909 , New York . 1 ')16 Atlas of Ocean. Shore of Suffolk Count Y� Eastern Section . Belcher Hyde . New York .urr . D . H . Atlas of New York State . Stone and Clark . New York . Su__ '_ avid H . dap_ of the County of Suffolk . Published by the Surveyor General . Albanv . New York ASI 27 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold. New York Chase i833 Atlas_ of_ Suffolk County , ( Stony Brook Map Library . SUNY . Stony Brook) c_he . J . jr . 1" Atlas of. Suffolk �_- Long Lo Island . Chase _ and Co . . New York '_olton . --- ! _".ap_ of 1836 (Colton 1836 Map of Long Island , Surveyed by Smith . Sheet 4 . ( SUNY . Stony Brook :dap Library ) Traveller ' s Ma-p of Long Island , Jan 3 . 1918 . Library of Congress Register No . --- , On File : Historical Map Library . SUNY . Stony Brook . Qhman and Co . ( Publishers ) 'van of. Long Island. . Colton and Ohman . Geographical Publishers , New York ( Publisher ) Travellers. Map of Long Island . Published by Colton and Co . In the Suffolk County Collection , Suffolk County Community College . Selden . New York . -n ad . Tobias Lotter -; '7 '71 van of New York and Connecticut . Auasberg 1776 . ( Nassau Museum Reference Library . Hofstra University . 1986 ) Dewit 1602 Map of_ Long Island (no other information available ) . SUNY , Map Library , Stony Brook New York . L� ._rh and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk_ County . Dolph and Stewart . New York City . N . Y . Atlas of Suffolk County , Dolph and Stewart , .New York City . N . Y . _ acden . hiliiam ? `F V'a.p o.f '_yew York and_ Loner Island _ Published at Charing Cross . England . January of 1779 ASI 28 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York t!alsev . William Donaldson 1924 Reconstruction Ma Qs_ of Watermill to Wainscott 1.650-1850 . Maps drawn by Godfrey H . Baldwin . In : Sketches of Local History . Re-published : The Yankee Book Peddler , Southampton , New York , 1966 . Available at the Suffolk Historical Society . Riverhead . Hulse . Isaac t7'97 Map of Brookhaven_ Townshi.p_L Suffolk County . Long Island . L . Belcher Atlas of Suffolk County. New York , E . Belcher Hvde . Inc . . New York �e . L . Belcher Atlas of Suffolk County . Part of Riverhead and Southold . -New York . E . Belcher Hyde . Inc . . New York . _ '" Atlas of the 'north Shore_ of Suffolk. County . Western Section . 1917 ( E . Belcher Hyde 1917 ) . J=••tfervs . Thomas 17Gf< Maps of the North American Colonies , Published by Thomas Jefferys . London . England °.3-her . W . W . Geological '."lap of Long I..sland . Topographic survey by J . Calvin Smith . _✓:ontresor . John t@ 1776-1780) Ma_p of_ Coas_tal New York . Drafted during the Revolutionary War . No exact date . (Stony Brook 'Flap Library . SUNY , Stony Brook) Romans . Bernard 1777 :�.ap of Connecticut and_ Adiacent Lands . Amsterdam. 1777 . Reprinted by Covens and Mortimer from a 1780 original . ( Stony Brook Map Library , SUNY . Stony Brook) ,-ith . J . Calvin Geologic__ M p_ of_ Long. Island . J . H . Colton and Company . New York ASI 29 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold. New York Southack . The_ N.ew England Coastins Pilot . 1734 London . England . hornton . John 689 The En,&lish Pilot ,_ Fourth Book , 1689 . John Thornton . On file : Map Library SUNY , Stony Brook . ' armv Map Service Wa,diil_g River Quadrangle__,_ Army :dap Service . U . S . Army . Washington D . C . 1444 , scale 1 : 25 . 000 States Coastal Survey U . S . Coastal Survey Map . Photographic Copy . Map 1 : 10 . 000 . -891 U .- S . Coastal Survey_ Map, East End_ of_ Southampton Town . Town Pond to Airfield Pond . Surveyed by C . 1 . Iardella Asst . titates Geological Survey Southold Quadrangle . Suffolk Co . N . Y . ( Scale 1 : 62 . 500 ) Surveyed 1903 . Printed 1909 . Army '.an Service -1 ;1/ 7 Southold_ Quadrangle_,_ Suffolk Co . N . Y . 194 7 . 5 min series . ( Scale 1 : 25 . 000 ) L`nited States Geological Survey 1`+�6 Southold OuadrangAq , Suffolk Co . N. Y . 1956 7 . 5 min series . ( Scale 1 : 24 , 000 ) ASI 30 / oq I ' rk i V yrs _ f L 1 � � � -��. jj/ � y •,� .. / `l Srz 31 1 . The English Pilot , Fourth Book , 1689 . by John Thornton . COLOWY Or RB Odn I SLANID a t .n.r.( 2'ROVIDENCY. TI-ALNTATI01\ ft_f• a c . �.�t ��"f a It fn..r ti:d"M•+I kJ7�rr •J IX!, ,t • — .J,.ij w.r.�:•.n./ew...r.,. .....•../H.../rr. ./f:r...._ ,f. rw,rw i�.+f.cL♦v / O 1 rlrJlf..rid!n•..�r//;..,.� .i.;,,�,//.:.�•.!�.�...��' ..+./'1.....(�«.�.•........G' C U.d J'T /• • ����(J ► I. y ilr li✓.+w w•ar.C...�.. 1iL..C.a...♦w. .v r.v♦r/.��. ♦ /./r./.-.:..d/f ih✓:. I • .,�/� / at•• 1iw ,�.�w.(IL��w+w.... xr..buw. 'a.' .g n 1 fi(lt•'/ ! fr.3i 'w7' �1..wrt'd'r.•• .♦r1' .ri...'., Lr.rA:.•..//./.' 4fw./ ♦ /�- i.�r.I fwri :I � B ° a • \.�l..�da•O I HOV . 1S! I(D Y OF CON NF.Cncrr G•:�bnl�° .r c�"6^•�s •a f"'"" s 1] ENCEI'LATiTATION ♦ ....1 r ., e •- A. {• •�!! `�'i:'.•s•:tr.alf"' 1•• 6',+u::'.....` r •• .�i.v itiiLwl ,. � 1f.aAfu�t 1 �' 'I Y ' .\ ':t..r....•...J• ° n y�►✓+.Ivat" /.•riJ.Lv/ Y i• C A../..11.�w��ir�! .: 6/.. .O, �../I....^r.r Jwinr a Cit p.� . ;• (rnnJli�.. •�� J/.d.:��,y.� _ .O:• +•- a ••,. //I .�! ,_ O '..�Tif�..• ..w//A..Y �+ as .�r .'/�l;vr \. r .�"d,• •� ♦ • e �i�.Y T:c.rf.✓ � — I — ' / ' ._..., \r+-ha•+� ) fi _ �}alnm Llin[•r.0-.rr r...�� -w:�. r � � Ol Jf.•..✓ ;o a e ♦ .. .:v. � T tJ J .� rr �r.r,r.' Q•P/J s�]: \�r ;f itd..... z " I �fif/ .fii o lXf/U�lli I.fL.a d4c / .'! 'l1�Uo.d — y • >c Ki �r 1 �J �. .w�';a �••, .• R�. \ c lI i ``�_(.rrrl.(rro/ '•' �: '"+ 'la/r n .r \ r •7 ^�.J / } .Y// 2�, \J _r.!... i r— / Ld/rnf a J.Gw.r' m „`�•\,�1� °' �- •d • J !� ... �v..�......� A�� .'3l.ampm'/..G+��•• ......s•J+.J i rt S t; 'I ¢ c' �;% a Mgt a d:a )•s es ♦..L.J.4...w / , /� / ►'' •1 a �• � t a '��; I ^•Spas � �� ' / PQ • c A 1'.a y '. a / 1 _ :;b- 1 C.H,� fZ/Mail r , �' N a I S l' ! } - 1•• � Ir(cwJ r..J/ urw.• rL�s..r w i1 J m.:f�+'♦ .eY \ 1I / �rL✓..r.d a..wrw/.r1.d. , �"y'� io..r r.I.•..!: f:�+tJiC IL! �... Lr..♦.•.r./4..r...Ifi+.�i 1�1 w ri:Al, d 1 1,171♦,ii// _ �vr//�/r�.M •/'%�.♦t' .!J //.Y/i.14 faflw/�7..r♦%.-V ~ {Yi♦n1 .r•/�•J / i{• '+SLP&..-i1'.wl/.�C.+l,ai.w iG.t�vM w e ' ,J �:a:.; r./,vFr.�•►.:.atsecc, t:.*:. / .ar7fjl jeJ.J i.rr/r..ir....M/ir A..r•7 � tic c. "c�('•::: `� ' 1) ..-�J)j•��_'///� //f(� V �/[1[10I' 71 AJ �\' ( " / AlY r `�T�: �;r'� �� �^ r o^ ��mo' "' -,'�UlFntd � F� 4 =" �n'•,' �w ;., _ � •�(;'-� ��.�--��=-`\ ri, —.-i �_ _ - �?=• ��:.\�:-.7i•y.�'�1 i7,,;t• �'��_ ;=�` mss,..%'7��i, /:/'�-�/!I �`\���.�•'�_ '-// �_ 41. gz 104 / %r ♦ r `��++ .�. >1 sti;: IM /u•�_--_-_� _ _ _-_-___�:��� ��Y19_ytl [�,���^`- ,,,��-1`���}JJr!��������///T`^�''' J9 ;, —�J/i'/ d� -rj1���, N W _ -- _ '_-..__=�-•�_'-��r-: X1.1 - �!�`•t.►���..1��}�,� d: ar %% ' - ,_spy - 1-___ �tip---✓ r� _' � _ ♦ •. "`j/'.�, , �� ,__ �I. JY Q(sa-1.. �'l "r' •Y•i•r •+ •�• j'1 \\` ` "� r 6 'J5 r/��/ 'r�� , .i...�ilorbrw- f,•,th And art aad :, %'; CdUNT ', .�^ � �,�•' +ii r Ove -- 11 �0)� -.a •.:- `••+� _ - •_ -. ./ ��-/,Jam- ✓, /:,i//j/,/i�/� , . of thfl,-XATOVACKS. - - .V. .r C �"•'t r//� �...-;%,�'. "!��i %-'�/ ''/ - � 'ir � •Dirlua �"�',• '�•,` -;_.,(�3�' -_sem_ �%�, ._ '-' J�� '%.- eV _••--arl<<� .,''i- � � Il(c i:i ��UIICS�r: s• `�1� _y � - �-- � -� _ / i - , all to �%moi �.-- ��/j�j�•�i�: � % -� •' �� Gc//7a-tbr i - /- - - -�� Vii'�� _.1/---- •�Z _��- / �/� % / / - %.' �i .,� ' S •r .,a�' .�`'S, a TV.Y. . ,•.`�/' .r' ii" 'A t �'': lJ,t+i' �R�� y,, f �,'7' �' t t k� 3' r =,,� i`,�� 1 •,�t`+i���,}�Is, ��-' .i•�! r ���1 ���s�j�.'.,�,���• k'�'`, •y 'ti'^� .�'�+. _� • , i�• :,,,sem. .•• r ..�.r�. �, '� ' ({' . ,�• `! i3` 4. .' .'•c�i {�.�• ;t �' R �: 1 �.,!! 'i� 1 f fIL...,2 7 `��A,a"r'•' ',l •i' '/ R � .. - I,� -r �.�• � A t� } It- , - �.. I ` ._ •F 1 rs., ,.F y ��.�•� r .c.�l f "t r.1. , .� 'Y• iJ14 :t�J ,. 1 x'.;1.'1„`bj+.Ii.;�I�i�� 4`'r .,.�,i,' � �•`.�+�►' '+: C. ,1 y 1 ! C1 cit•- a ` `IN �.��.��' 1 •},,•t l��”�.�•'1�)ifs � � �( ((` 1�.� j r{� ) �. ,.� •� i, � � l ,.ice, l 1 1 � :f.• r � �•V$JJ6J6+i!J'' L�� -7 J„f� 1 � „ r ,, I .. •mow. ( }, +k 11 '. ' a ''+ .. �,'- �, 1 is ,.. •. )� ``� - •'t�!y,((li ..,1J�7! e.1..I t �!_.� rt •r+'-' ..._. :ox.1 i, 7 � ' t `�, �5 ,y{ f Df 1 `�i' j7`+I�.��r• �. _ r''�, �rl` �! � •y 17'x,' � 1 ,,: ; , 34 4 . Plan of Long Island in New York Government , North America , Scale 6 miles to an inch . British Map of Long Island during or just prior to the Revolutionary War . .o n x w r OD Ln 00 .. R.NrdiLL O ����� •h�I1rLL YAW MGCK ROA�HS Y fLA 1�1 p ACitr: cN�se �a5� r` Z 127�knxrlr I. q�tL 126 m., ---- ...... ... ..... .._....... . �' —B • _ 32oe1[T:W_ r(l to AC t'MlEDuck uck-Y-o--d= t ` e � _e CIDM T --=Z f 1�� I Ar L'- - A�t'na S O u T -— –- -- J 0 d ieh ori�i,�Zlt� 1 - - 8 - -- --_- _-_ - - - -) .i--Y_ j 00 �OLl Nest bar col e 0-04 -• _- - =GLO�V _��_ =--- Wall P. S b g�' `�n ------ --- y Flv r - sOZTTHQLZr — So le Hale. 3 --_-- -4 I BdI' _--- A ortlh Sea > s O u r r O N ri g am ton to Sl' 0101 / no e e � y Z A T H i! Y 54H ZG b00li�i777t/AL� L�jSII�ptr•A l �atr Z2M •U A /Weal H Pt L f'%'I - _ f eptt o"e 00 -t T IN 37 7 . U . S . Coastal Survey in 1836 . — � — .:,,;� tel_✓� rte"- 1, • _ • %j_����/jai.,� �° ��f /,/i//� ., � � � •moi-� V"' Sonfl B 'r //' .'moi,%.,/:,?% �, yr,�� »,y, -•---z--�` cochu < � ij•' r� ..meq `"'Sy .. ,�•w-. a��• • lot is �' � \� •` �_'r�- ' ,. bo li.ccxtnrk �,�• �, � 'mole +a .,. /,;, '/.,.:j� Seattle no E c •��.: '`,�� 'i jib. J � � f •'- /%% "moi � ��•• S•y9 t011 � •i� ��/•/j T Slrswuee,ve;: � _ j y� .�.�11 �_- A .'1 • _ �/moi���!---/ j�� 10 CA 36 6 . Burr Map_ of 1829 z 17 1 � LLJ \ 1 � � ��%°'�. 'ter �^•vJ a 35 5 . The 1797 Survey of Southold Township , prepared under the direction of Thomas Moore , Supervisor . CUE- w 00 MANOR H 1 LLS t�\1�o � ��' le, r���!!= . et ��¢ ddbt•"L tt L" `t" l�lL T� ,��• y �`� ( J?\ r- t:RePve ■ I'er�, _ 1� ,�"� tt` ¢L�c;p Clea' ;•, ,�) ;.� a SOL Jo � v, o . y 5 �'4t1=. � �- — I •'%sir„' .I • t' 1 ,�.F ,� �c �l� 4�tisk tL��oo�ee���� �,�o�,��. v, o • t- i,:�: ,�1,.111N! I s �_►i- - tt>��r i5 t41t�11�cY Vb 01t`t��1s��`.;"'C,bt�` ziy e 'l+u° `SIJ1uxn,ri I 2'erT�,' 1 `� err J'b f�a�Se. f�, 11 nt t,l , "1iTv y•,1.11, LJ�+ 4�� e o 1L,hvrze a Jl,Drurr� jn 11rY'f 1'' vt n� �l•�1�� t..�Lrlu,z� '��' tom, � .`'G,� �jf� i��, '!' r`�ir'. _ • i � •�� ■E �h'• y'�.t;/V9% `', I �'�c i��til IJ�� �!�f•G;�v�r �l ..;rA,irG� �:I•'`�`��Ci Z, � T. �. ��i 1 �i,S,,'�/.,� ` � .'.'!„ /.J%/,.fu„`J \ �Iy'�'I_ ti�j��;JJ%t'`i�. .t�.�,� •� �t�• r ��O �'-.o �Ll LP%[e7• Iti,C .✓tl ��tC 1 .1',:5•. ., I �^ �� .J: !�� q-! � jI �\� �'.� Irl I1 ,.,th,M.,rW ► {. ,,{�'' PROJECT ARE �,.� ,, `'. L1.7:,;,,/, V J . two 777-11 a • t' �', Lrtu>5I['Y r .Il(..SnzztT. ` . \ '"� O N z oT y.i'R�t .h a cB� T N . 1 .¢. �11t,nu ttrt t, ,J.I)e"D z• _ k' 1 I lU]�' °° �' �,�� 0 9 ,fl7, .� VE p I/lCA/ .c„pith •\ ?l., �/li�r�it �S�rnPzevl �.���:Qi�`�,�•��Ec �`��t�. IJinyP.e X.•1� UTCN06 _ ,.l Uri t wu1,/. �� A hi'> s /.•�rJ t ° ; t�' 1 � u Cu l'e` B. 1 I•�S�7 N . 811 e,: �yoQ���� ll,N'v„LI .� rev !t 7?tfli:lZ ° •rrr • x�� 13r1[•z,ul 1•pi' ff.zurorrotr. f s N;t�,' ' rn-,r Zlfl/iUtard_ Carthv ca�” ,�mcu,zL t-✓r![�'y't �1Sti � .� ,�. b•n y Lf rl LC O 9. s • l ort/c+• e _ f { c st,j�t`"t� yS� lanai SES y T.J. h1.1'l7 D X15 s I,�1 ` sg 90 1 171. J.lLli,cc.to:.L �t cfit S1,o<<C,�� h` �ti 0� S Q O iL�1JJif,? 'er i �e ,dc,Jr t,ILl:tc �L.J1��. t • Gd pf.. pl2 r f 1 t 9� r : 1 .-1T r�• d./1 ase • �' S to .Wrle ll_I'� o,.[d o ��.(./rrc lin �� t \ ��Zlrf j +* S t 1 S J ov C IJ ► s ,L 1+►rtKz'vr, a;" M,e r t �� y .� t` ,� r�'n L7 1u� ,• ►r. a—i-- 6 r IL 1 1� .i B. ` lx./lilr[t1t,, '134 1 1 cv ;t�LLW� 1 z\ ���',i� 0°✓tl` Suit.• Lac%t�,su)[ I„tftr / Gsxor i ♦ XY:7l, well LL L�a?tlthilZ It ► �Ia 7� Lu. j t f V •�U�'j11 Fn f �L . ry / tl!y )vis 1Jlor c•,t j ,l.!` � • $ t!(i' GU ,�.�•0 well 1 LLl �� �!� "rtor� •• [i f /�/i !1�� �Tvrey -• • ♦ .1T i'�q }t!n)p[ 1rB• c i 3 ` �� t ��; il.C''"te,s i e •aG:4Jlo,�/u,. 1 �S 1 erG �- �L h • Y.2•• ' �� • �1 is I J•11 �E• G 1 •♦ *' "rtun h. ,s.s �f.J��j 1./,� G�;1! too. L.Pc-ire,►• t.i. on ] �•� t�htjtf 1cl pt • 6ucdd g6w I S�P o. i1w 5 LAS e' ,~.' •/• \ u sb !•F', q �L,g�ls}i I \`�\,L ` �� Jso , SS s♦ Or ung ,ni�tt4c!fel.[?.Vii`=�1 '� rte ) I �� l \ q1A 7 ��/ �' T p.�t'. _ / J�(!� (�U �C p� oe��f(L f .uthsTt'��_v y-up. ,/�� rt'f• r.� IL'./::Ili,.�•J l .`� �� •�0 rUn /; .� �,N. 1 �IL L,,c•• �� .li I I .SIiW .�Jc 1! `"\ ! 0.71 I �V Ver•ifI ;y ►"NJ/u,r a 0 • �� =^ \\ 1�i1C 7�thrJl 1 \� \I�/�;�j! ,� r►'R I / \X CUTC (,-C41 . J. `._.rcIz . A w o- 4 0 L a V� -P0 gr a � lbea fl se TO. a scM � fl �O SCAB � AFteaR s 1909 t3cl.cH�t NYCPrAh vow I►TLI►$. DP QOCFo`K GLV aTY SOV N{� S NORIG 41 11 . Belcher Hyde 1909 Oi//er �'�� ~'c G�1/e//s �ruosh•i " ✓.3'iinor/ o� cs. StaPnos/ri o Terry ✓o/irs Bar/7-0 oa`� ri Oa✓io�s 6rodos/ri _ �N�lst� /kf,Co�y �O B4uer OJT O Niyreslri 6P/114-e//1 Donne//y v Doraski .� EmooA /Yrupski �� y Ooros,Si F Cze/otha ✓.4etiohii� SwioteiS o E /yorfOrJ /7ior�o r) •B.6rothnve// 6rothrye// 1 C.G/ovrr D./rorc/sski Smith �Y•O Davia/s `Yi/es Cpm Mr's Case Est. - Robert Lindsoy /redden (Sreyszko 9'�F !Ya/os/ri ✓Ms/�ee �• j Fh:po�inron H"Rob/rsson A.Si//eck PH.Nortaa SOA, D y,Cowell yrs Le Ile J.6/erer ' ✓,9urns g zev. Stepnaski' Drum /-loroton C•Bi//ord YR1i A'r s Stcr „ ✓G/o ver ,//foyot rs/ri A'lDoroay eusiNe'3 Zoneslri �6/ovvr 2S.1. J.l'A/lrr B.//arq/ G.Tuthi//. _ E` 60A. Zenes/r/ N Ba�Or ? ~� WD Bo/win �i s.Bi//off Q Doroslrr Grathws// W +,pc&chle Geo.Bi//oid L A//en c4/{'6�vthwal . Ai sto t Q �4 r Pv or/a CL A� BSA. b A/o'i-ic/,Est. �'c G ✓ //er Horton W N.i J.LYic/rhorr� GHQ/� h'orr F/eet f//oA. N i�Doy!`on Kendii� 0 _ Sor►��'newicr ,`�G F.Moeoveicik �j ITT E C.Geo rbwell mss'-' NoSsou q!F/eet Paint C/116 /y'a/os/rl G. Cc.re �• j3!Johnson H G "0< NORTH FORK GOLF CLUB N C K wc/rhom H/ickhom ✓.Downs Moon �"�/ 4SA >Z Bo tterrluJ Gra/rfwe/� vFF� 0Ini� N is LK ✓.F�H/f%/37 AYL. 42 12 . Dolph and Stewart 1929 ® r II • \ Q 0 fo C tchogue,, \ r • to 4 •• 10 M A '. ?5 % O •• : Cutchogue `r• i \ O• • 11 • L18 RT • 11 ` • • • ••• • SPIRE• ' 11 • i� �O ` • • •. Wickom 10 • • USCAGS CUTC OGUE • `� `1 • •: ) lil Creek 6•• c II z • •� 11 ��f _ Marsh Pt 43 13 . U . S . Army Map Service Southold Quadrangle , 1947 JO" 1 29'00" 28'00" Cu'tcho e:Sta • r-3O �= UG 4544 BM: 10 Sacre earth .• �� \ O . •\ Sc i �Q►•• !,...� •- • 290 000 i I 1 -�'�- — y 27 -- I O • tiJ • C FEtT , utcho+ e ' � chogue I � � it � � ► _ O\\ �- . •• •`''� • Ol 11...1.• ��,•��� • �- t , 20 �ib o:!Country Club � SBM ,�25 ► ' 'f oil 41000 (' / -� / • .\./;• '�,;_ - ...._ � ate,/ i - - :� 72°30' 1 711 2 420 000 FEETI NEW SUFFOLK 0.7 Ml. �Cl10 Mapped, edited, and publisned by the Geological Survey Control by USC&GS o�bh Topography from aerial photographs by Kelsh plotter and by----- N planetable surveys 1956. Aerial photographs taken 1954 _ M Hydrography compiled from USC& h GS chart 363 (1956) Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum 1MI 231 MIL: 44 14 . U . S . Geological Survey , Southoldsaa Quadrangle , 1956 THE HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUE Southold, New York ADDENDUM ASI 45 cu f6 Cu _1S1i r CU 106 GU U 100 q 11tC ogUF.1 �cuao. Xl� �/l •k Cutchogue Sta ' Cu 99 :,`£uGEN f a0 •• CU93 27 " �'' cv4� ;x - " ::cu C• ' CU�2° t1C -.1-cled Heat " ;��CU �. %1: p .of4. , , . :•bcu �r r 4r'Cua4A �. 191U 1' r. CU �5 �CU42 - a- 007., Petr C_� f' c_ u qa ;1 C U 41 irj et C U 40--=© Nam � "�Al �i�'• + Far cu 105 �0 d �A S,t i CU8,q ,�► cu q2—r_yt,: (1�^V-�.\�> , q . \ i' rtchogaoqINSCRT ='+ jn' SE:ECu 2 0 _i ;;;••`: 7, . LnnozT �C g7 r •�� �`a. F T tt :w01 o.. St, ', •z 1. 7 cu "R 4 C RUCO 1 � � s—C7' n ' `` U 1 - �, ` �..,�•:y,�i.e e t s.�,'y ••• c'n1+'3 CU �CU IO :� \l�C 1;u.,cu 6 :. :��A% u t c h ng u e tub _ "o< � Harbor �° �' r�c+rt1+ rook 'F \ �.n�t•3. Y o.; xC�unt,y Club ^ ' e 3 Horars � { Pt CU NO5 NP6 .r `' (I• '� _' AO ��� � % r S UU✓'t�•' �~ �1 II _ 0 LITTLF. PECONIC' BAY 13M Z •° T��= :• 32 os o Cour,h'Fork l ` ,•yr�7^ C T�TCH Or,UE HARBOR �� try Cb b ��; -p'. iu'`. 1tK7a I� I 0 f1 _ " IJ _ Nit +- W 0 ` BpT10 ew '' V o� �(�� o+ Old Cve ?• u o e �. I Yacht Club °° N F n1iz''= +.EylrN:• Sur Olp � •± 46 . t' x • p SMS _ Co (tri 5E:E L1) ' o. r ;+: ^A. ' . rc`��--;�:. • •fir-I�'-- IT5E:R r ooka-r U T j3 H 0 L D •ws° ti- � Po nt N r ;M• , - Z to Z21 Jo U:5 u V U N O R T H R A C E b 3 46 SPLIA File master map of Cutchogue 31.0 37.0 r. 37.5 41.0 36.0 x 0 - 39.0 .39.0 x 39.5 o a Q o 37 � O x l � . 25.5 ��\� �\ x 35.5 ��� \•< �� S a 33.5 x 34.0 \ L 21. v OR U. O 0O OGU O x 33.0 n 47 SPLIA File part of Key Map of Cutchogue ; ,^•. }, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENTORY FORM . _ 3_ DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION UNIQUE SITE NO. Cu 9j ' NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION QUAD ALBANY,NEW YORK t518)474-0479 SERIES �.. NEG. NO. YOUR NAMEbwl't7 'ef �b'�'+th�►��i ���^ .; DATE: YOUR 1 _Nlar h 1gRf Y: ,t ADDRESS. Town Hall Main RdIt Southold,L.I., N,y. 117L EPH0NE: 16-76 5-1892 ORGANIZATION �^zN (if any) Southold Town Corlmunit ``•, Dev. Off icteo • i i # i• i # i i i i # i i •�, - IDENTIFICATION I. BUILDING NAME(S): js•ti, 2, COUNTY. Snffn i it Ch Farmii:! 3. STREf.T ----_ TOWN/CITY. SO�±Lhol A ° 4. OWNERSHIP LOCATION W VILLA�E: tcho »p -����=�t•'-,. ' ERSHIP. h Of $ a. public ❑ 5. PRESENT OWNER Mis h Private r> Usr: s Bertha Kurczew�DRESS: Depot Original- residence Lane 7. ACCESSIBILITY TO P -far Present: _ regi denCe_fg�PUBLIC Exterior visible from public road: Yes DESCRIPTIONInterior accessible: p No ❑ ^`~ •F :- Explain �BDDOintment Otlly •` 8. BUILDING a. cl apboard E1 b. stone El - MAT[:R1AL. c. brick ❑ d. board and batten ❑ v ' e. cobblestone ❑ f., shingles ❑ g, stucco ❑ other: •c �.., 9. STRUC'TURA'L , a. wood frame with interlocking joints ❑ •�'' SYSTEM b. wood frame w •' ith light members ® ,.- (if kn(xvn) C. masonry load bearing walls EDd. metal (explain) e. other -<.. . 10• CONDITION: a. excellent f] b. good ❑ _ I. INTEGRITY. a. original site © b. C. fair ❑ ' d. deteriorated ❑ . moved ❑ if so,when? c. list major alterations f ( -:, �• n�and dates (if known): -•• ;�- _ • �•.,. ,y';w::: 12. PHOTO: Froth South East ;r;;�;.,,;,. �:.:.y ;• t...•4� '�'`' 13. MAP: DOT Cute -nom os " "` . , P if .� •SiC7.0 M.irt '••,� •t } C� Com q cutcbogue •'�: 4 CutchoB> .. • 4e SPLIA Pile Aldrich—Kurczewski house T9 s1.' Cu 93 14. THREATS TO BUILDING: a.none known ® b.zoning❑ c. reads ❑ d. developers ❑ e. deterioration ❑ ' f. other: 15. RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: ' a. barn C1 b. carriage house ❑ ; c. garage ❑ d. privy ❑ e. shed C1 f. greenhouse ❑ picket fence g. shop Q h. gardens ❑ i. landscape features: pe.r2gbor at rear of j. other: IG. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (check more than one if necessary): a.open land [n , •b. woodland ❑ ' c. scattered buildings ❑ � d.densely built-up ❑. e. commercial ❑ , _ f. industrial ❑ g. residential ❑ h.other: original fence and posts at front of .. ...� , 1• • :J ,. _ property 17. INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (indicate'if building'or structure is in an historic district) ' 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF.BUILDING AND SITE (including intgrior features if known): Two and one half story,tbree bay,side entrance plan,gable ,. ,* * roof bouse.One and a half story wing on soutb,witb centered entrance door.Semi wrap arround porcb.Original ebimeys. Two over two windows. `- f SIGNIFICANCE �,.��`; ,r • 9. :DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: Built prior to 1873 •'�'��',�����-'k*"i;-,v. r;:'�:.• _• CHITECT: - •' �; - ',: '_ _ :;`: . ' . . T'r,••�:'.�_ - `�c�:`y�' BUILDER: fJ.—HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: Tbia twenty six acre working farm,provides an exceptional x��- - --example of the mid 19th century farm. The farnbouse and all - barns and out buildiags,appear to be in an almost unaltered ...:'.. a to to. 21. SOURCES: Interview with Miss $urezewsky 3/7/,86 by John E. Remsen _ f Beers Comstock Atlas of bong Island 1873 22. THEME: .: Form prepared by John..E. Remsen 2nd, Research Assistant . ', .•j: f n - • r e • : Jw r' Cu Aldrich farmstead Original barns and out buildings < From SouthRoll _ 12 ill ham' ' From North Roll B Neg 13 yr!K3t4 w w 'y. 5r �a�- Y r '��• •-J r yy1 v� • r. BUILDING-S•1 Ku(;l Ultt INVLN I UK f ruKm N0.,7 DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION 'QUAD YORK i, -;v,NEW.. STATE PARKS AND RECREATION SERIES EATION :4 L NY,NEW YORK (518)474-047 NEG' NO. 9 n DATE:, ""Town 'cif LTA ATF_- 'i/-_MarC OUR NAME: E L EPH 6&E':' 516— 76 5 8 9�2 OUR ADDRESS: TQWn Hall ,Main - 'Soutbold,L.I .....tN.Y A ' "Development Offic6s" RGANIZATION (ifCommunity .any): Southold Town F ',VI - We .7 W.A'k I . - I • -s.. - ENTIFICAt 4,7kv, k.: 0 .0 ]WIN GormanHouse—Office'. BUILDING NAMES): : ' CutctlogUe. -Suipo LLA E. Southold ,-COUNTY:- TOWNICITY: 11�;llweat aide De STREET-LOCATION: 0 PRESENT,b"Elk."'Mr."Pa t Gorman ADDRESS: 0 OWNERSHIP: public'O-..V,'!b.'pr to J �ros'sre ' Post .off vv-,residence—orr1ce ACC:'-Original: ice ESSI BI LITY-JOPUBLIC �:fExteri&ysib le'Frompublic—G* dr"Yes' 3_ :=No Ea oi tm on tppacceible: Itxpiin c. IPT 101 a, C 'lapboard 0 ',%5 `..st'6�13 . board and'batt Z".8. BUILDING ;*hi S ,.�g. S ucc MATE.RIAL- cobblestone Qr'--*4..shingle 1 0, > riterlocking joints IR .9s.. STRUCTUIRAC-*:,�4� :wood frame with i" SYSTEM: wood frame with,light. mei mbers 4, .(if kn(wn) masonry load bearing walls El d metal (explain) e. other d. deteriorated 0 10. CONDITION: a. excellent ?tl b. good 0 c. fair 0 - * ❑ if so,when? .-11. INTEGRITY: •a.a. original site ❑ b. moved c list major alterations and d _ati.Pf known): .Porch added in 1.95 8 Roll B, Negl5 'i" `; From glaa06K East ..'DOT Cutebogde om 081_f PHOTO: I MAP: Cutl:bove sta ;acredm Heart L ce A cutcho Cutchoi OM 32 5,4 3'� 54 SPLIA file Conklin—Gorman house +y ���kr,� J .;� 1.`,• N .. t �15'��+1Ylir'K/,ur"^� 'k_ yl.�{ w'?r1..- S .:rel• �, '' .r tq h r>.."64�{'L4y,}'•rj'� _ `% ••J;) !. �'L•.' y 1 ;"!•, tl?'+� 1 1 y J'F �I'I l�li,,,,•,�,,?'I•-.t',F�+1 .T. .'•. t 's `.. Ire-•. '.t..,.�\_ ,. %1 . 1•:A J '. y _ 4. : HREATS TOBU1I.DING. a:hone known ® !� b.zoning❑ '''t. C. loads.�`" d. developers '❑ J-,:C. detcrlOratton ❑ -'`• �+'�tl'ler:'�'*w;'4�t.,.�t°•lr+'S•'-.s:'i:ct;•:ti,,7,�•r�:�s....`?i ` � V'^ >s2 Y' ._R LATED gj3UI DIN_ S ARID'PROPERTY.J1' "?'`; `` +�`!�� "i4 ` x �r k r _t:. barr)O rj,4 icarriage hours 0,,,;!c. garage 'D.• reenhouse '`��'" L' d.•pnvy D.•�;f. e. shed ❑ f!.g t�- • �'ig. shop'❑ ' •;tl;-gaidens 0� , yti�;'sri,�,' = �+'t�K• J`Iandscape Features. �1.. ,�>. :,. ,.�.:,.�.; ��, ,,• t Or 1 S�...,•.gther`'' :`•1~� w+ lit;: •�,_ !<r4., /it , i:^Y'f33F9*i'f�C'Y�, ,�:.,� URROUNDINGS40� THE BUILDING check more than oneifnecessary): openland „ .Lwoodland ❑i��,, �' .'`c�+�y�` 'k ? .i , shattered bpildings Wad. ensely built=uli,Cti.";co ❑' •�' '_:�'`'a .�s•' t*it 4_•r y f ndustrial ❑ g. residential ❑ -.h".�bthei•':���lacR�:'.;�ri �% •4..:�,�.. :� :?24. r.r. �'•�. •'.;'r�'•���{f,�• �.i •c `r`w' .-_ f .�{�.�•, I __ —_ _ ,�►yj.N=.r.•i�.sY'^.V: , � ' •17, . INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BU ILDING'AND SURROUNDINGS: .; .�.�Indicate 9f building'or st' ture;is irIS i an Historic`district�_ t `:br.:; Part ;of rural strreetscape,Across�. from Our Lady :of Ostrabrama' r'�., \.� '�^fsfl :� ys• �•G '�)'r;'1:: '`�fJ ' •�•. .K..'.-M,L�o.{J:r.• '•°`('},�, +Y•. iiia i .et .rt;t,:...• f+,.,,,�,..!.E,?4.i�=tri�,,•��,,,. S.�''S;_f'i},�4Co'j't��..,, •.��rt.•,;`.:.\.'�,Fyc•,,�•s.�..t'e:,•'ti;,iVj•'�;��•:��.,!fr:•.l?i'r�..r.��•.0 r,#.4�..,re�•.fY..�4ekf.PL:;.t:+f�<4'":�tia;y•iy�rt,'.-,X•fi(:t".r ry,`(_,'��,;'mo;f;:.;i•'''.,v•�.y,1...�.��A`•i,�';�r�;•'a1f'i,t.33.`.••Y:'�•,.fi"s.1r�o'R',�;,.}�LR.<1\3 'xw'"s��q1'S�•,�cW:-,vJ"`Rr."'-��•(�..,J)1,��t•�\,Cia�-g`',yJ1�:'+:':�:':.,:'s�•`h:`<X_5,4 ,i_"1,-..re':!,•.'.••.�.".�-'. �r�r".Y►-�r��-�7R•e'�1�.'�t,,viFS�':...��7"��'{,%;�:''''�: •;t!,x�'C7. •t7r`t•F1 + )•!lt•,;,:a�•�y',Y.���T•+�'"r ,. �: >; .�. •. .18.17.-OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING'AND SITE_ (tncluing ini�nor features if known)V =�; �• One-and-a-half story;double bouse:North section of._three •'•. and south section•'bf='foiir"bays:Small-windows under" .the eaves. ':•�'1.' ' 2, „ •slo r:;a'>P!�<�!,�' ry}!�;'f?'j!:"�a{�,`.�''f,LF ;'��� * ��.t�y"�Z_�ti"••'�' ',� •�'• .s•t�o`�_.: ��"3'�:�Y�r _�,: ::.-.'r ����•�•,f+.,r1.4�,":'riy,�h''. -,rdCG r .s,j�+�1�'.. .�sil.� ,t•+�...+t•�i� , `�i-j�lf('•r 1r`irY''�''�..?�••?'f..: � 'r :>" ••„i: r',� �•+�y Tu�r,�, �,:�t"� .f,i�_...:,r;,'(�i J2.it•• .€ ✓t�'f!•''~�1't ''��T;,�.,k'a•ss,�' .. .. ;�.,);, .�.!'�.� •w:f,.�5►�:§!'''�` _ .r••�•:�tif�'�`��•.S�•,:li'�fr+J�•�;•::.'r^yl;�ty.'r.'milt;,T�.r'�-�q'�.':t.:�,�'",',mac'.`,� fyx'+-y���p'�'� ' "'�� .� •:1 �.o^, 'x%v::,:... _ ,.'••;•%;,.. ,::r`t1.; ?:tea. "[4V^ ir''+ ,r.�f''t••��••' �:�'ir �.•"'• � '4r,;, " .�' t ,• L' S".' x r z' x SIGNIFICANCE .. �:•::? ���'��-'.'�, ,,., :.. ;.?;_r.. ,`t'„�,;,.�F=ik�. + w,"''' 1° ^� ,•:,,�.•�., 1;9 ; DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUC ION: "" 2lzii ii re'"18 8 ELT' �J"r� •iiQ•1ha`rl4 '•�i.'r:'�[..� L' 'psi ± tl. E BUILDER ' xi' 7 : ,i vtG. �i+, 'lf,�,:�•J�, �` ; " •y f�M�f•��`1., .r.�!r_iy'!,f`•iJ:r,.t;.'..ilk.'�,7�;;:rf� �J�.1•.�r��t�tiy,"�'•y�►;� "• r•'} ' -S _bRICAL'AND ARCHITEC'1~URAL iMPORTANCjE��: ,T his � •' �•,... building was the second Post -Office in__Cnteb'ogue ;'' ``.. ,;?�•„•,-�• ;• ._:.,••c_ + • „:rya,. .t-`;::. t'�3rt.% r?{�• :,t,c.. 'q ;:`�. , 1 _ `was T. Conklin-on. , �• 1.s.i `. - ,. . S: ,yt!.{' "� .•yam' •ri�':t•F 't' : '�•,.¢•� v --1• dk Idles-a.�•.:,ia.r.r" W. � .-tn�. !!p"',vr, i:�,: :;: •v t,r'w+'✓�.r ''�J- •�,''i�' 'ic.. '•,l•. ra, " '.,_ 'r::%,,,.r; _' 't�,r•:..f: -i J:' r.�.,,7.�'•`•y'^.'•:•':r'�1' .:, ' s;kr• �• . r'KTr�': _ . / <v.;.� ,'Y: 'X:T!t•�'1.�13 '.14.Jf J. h•�`• _<.t' .,t:•`�:l�i.�1�.�a.i,+,•,�':�,<l J� ��.'�' ,p�y�i•'; �' a�i' - s ...- �• •�� .••,.'. .a; '''�'d. fir I>h'K 7i� *�s.:'f��{�"�^� rla:h�r•. , .�'_°T•Y•'j.r'C•L,yG � � A,�.<. -- •'.y _ ,`�'�..i•._r.�, .i T.Jtt. ,V�,�,9;�' :,µY,pF,r.•. _fS^•.':,:•,,. •. ��f.�a�.t ti 4,f �..,.r,-+r•y�►'•u1,r.. ,�1i I i• .,•'yy,{'>'�!'.:::,,'�t=1.:�o1+T:r';., .. ���1} "?:+ ,1yt4CGJ:: 21. SOURCES: Interviewer ith "pre�e nt ow ner,Mr. Gorman 3%7/86' , . Cha6e:Map of Suffolk County, 858—.1. ;THE N1 ,,_ ` :.•v:' �'. r "' `+Ara:`' ' ' Form prepared- by John T.' .Remsen 2nd,Reeeaich Aasieadt " • � t. S• , r� J 4: ••(; 1.1 �,�. 'TYV' a..�l� •.•1 •'+.. r. 04 �•'yF.,<�,,•r%-h�r; .�•: ,�1-"' •i;� ���.,t_'!�M s•�t.,•moi. 1,iia y'�:' 't�7;'>S.rr•`�r1'';'�^ •. 1•r �• r APPENDIX I TAX ASSESSMENT BOA F ORS Telephone 516 -76S-1937 90 July 24, 1989 Mr. Richard Cron, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Dick, RE: Suffolk Cty Map 4 102-1-33.3 Approximate Ass„essmt Total Assessmt 80 - 2 Story-Condo 750 sq.ft. $ 51000 ; 440, 000 80 - Ranch 1200 sq.ft. 4,700 376,000 and Garage 300 sq.ft. Land (approx. 800 ea. ) $ 128,000 Total Assessment- - - - $ 944,000 89-90 Tax Rate 8 $503. per --' $474,800. - Tax Assessment Total Condo tax ------ 6300 3200 5500 2800 Sincer ly, CCW:is Charles C. Watts, Chairman Board of Assessors N � � M vv -57 ovlK7 --qqimooi� S. 044x3 a , � "'" -3.- J� JE: 6a 7" Z. 1 NN I t � � � 1 •� 7 ��,3 7°r 3 '3a"w. .000,�,o � � '7, l ,�4� � � r+ o v N �1 4 7 /,� ,�6��--�'moo''v✓, z o CIV, sr i 6*"UITMCRI.ED ALTERATION bR AMIDDI$ ' TO TL'IS t,"VEY IS A VIOLAT*tZ�OE GE TTS :.:W STATE j���'� � � fes'''•'•' IDUtAll,'M LAW. ' J � �• � V 4..wf� I "4 i.,�...�.wa r� �.ww �C�`rIG$fti?"�_ r1':._:Y{:'mac T.}�:ZEilfiN6 , -ro f 1 `ti...•` ,4 /� �,�♦ tA1C.Tt- �.,I V' 7 ��.,,// ��, / yam.-+-• •OT1f1.�TY:EY i'C,i.cJ�a iFS\:�'A:S::yA.oYT��'...,:x<'�Zke':.:Y."-:fi'.ATav%�FiSlC�'wTI' �iTY iS i�L:. f��Z..--...:i oGJiry FJ � O / D . i+.�AM Mlz+Mot, CTE TE IE d .L'as�Til- 1'J L o/VC; YY `' f (� .. .moi}........_ .,....._ , , ov 19 0- z 43 3 w = 3 3d AS UIR Q 3 • `p w 3290 �1� 0 � � � . �a .�j � ��Ec C- ^ AIRE A 3 , , 2g y z° I 31., 33. 0 Z 3 3�2 3� Z z%a5 z�zs io z6'�s e Q � �- �.Jam-► � 2�•'3 v 1 - o •3 32 \ �.3/ S QCT3 j C `3 s � `�� `J-.a s 0 ��'. X30 .y�• • � -�2 e �, �0 ^ w "C� w • \. 0 11,0 r o - \ 3 Q � e �� O ���\Ba. 0 Spm • 0� V� � �' w • � �' \ y �Cq O 3/+/4 w ." IN 7 3037. w 33fj 1 -• ' D% � � '• 32 a2.0 2. � �9z � � � O N o � \ 30 34+� \ �Z 1 • Q o �-71� �w a2 �/ N • nO J`Q BUFFER 2/ 9X3 \ \ 331 ig�o8 z9 p / I rIN n 9z �• ,J � W � _ ' � B3-7 X50 33 2 3a �, 3 36.4 ion �a J 3� ao • v \ w 30� � 2 �s W �N� p \ 31.75 \�� �• ��, \\�3s-�----_�'--`� 9a.4d 31 T.PE.9TiYlE/YT �r ¢'COii/T20GBLOG lY.gTE,C� \ w b /� �' I �� 3 ./ 35.G 3 `U• STOPQGE 3 � 0 1 �Q 01 L)5 X w 1 O 3 32 \ s Z-4.Z, 360.3 369. Zoo - Nlk -� �, >o D 33• 33 w � �• 'I/ Z �D.E��/TEOo//-rlLr�-' y, � �jj .� a \\ o \ 3 �• r v � 3 0 \ ^ \ �S -d7 0 3045 \ 361>16 3 �o / s 11 Z 3 a \ Z - � - j FGREENMAN:EDERSEN SULTINNGINEERS HAMLET 7-2¢-87 Cff—,'/4,UGE� l�, 'c1�T�G T iV9ME TO T.UE 6Li vAND 3 '°. 141"11-E T A 7' 325 W. MAIN ST. PLAN 517-"F Df�AWING N BABYQ SC�iI.E: DATE: Sl l=T NO. m LON N.Y. 11702 __ .. ._ 2 OF 'i� f I®C!1 i I I \ 3" 8AI RK MULCH REMOVE l3URLAlJ a ? PLY REINFORCED RUBBER FROM TOP l2 OF a GARDEN HOSE <NEVV ) I \ I ROGT BALL 4 a d \ n 3 "SHREODEO < a DOU8LE STRAND � /2 _ f BARK MUC_CH REMOVE DURLAIA GAUGE TWISTED WIPE 1 Sp fl (1 FROM TOP !12 ROOT 13A L L __ 77-PEE . I_I I� YV)QAP LAP 3y. �\ • L7\ E NDS DOWN Q0O I Ly I Cn„1V11N.6A UCER R -_I DO NOT —,STAPLE ILII IO / A E O„ F/N. GR O[ � pL A /VTING HOLE/ f== II MIN. - BACKFILLED W/ i3 - IIII III SAND %3'\ TOP.50/L x� — V3 PEAT a� FE ! p IFI III __. III \ ^ RTL!Z E AS�S EC EDETA L DEADMAN ANCHOR DRIVE N/2N ,30 '1 UNDISTURDED SUBGRAOE BACKFILL W/%35AND /�"M/N. = I2 //VTO 6UBGRADE 3y� wT SO/ % PEAT — MIN. - \ -- --- - -- ---- -- , -- `` FERTI IZE 45<3PECIFIED p to 0 i I SHRUB PLANTING DETAILru U A o*y I, UNDIS RI3E0.5 BGR DE I2"MIIV. NOT, TO SCALE TEE PLANTING DETAIL ® _ _ _ _ _ NOT TO SCALE _.__ �-� gyp, \ w • �- --� � \� � . _� - �-\ ------------------- kA to \ O 770� 41.0 } o E /ST r x 6• E w E o /vl �— 0 3 4 v • . \q o a✓G ,� �0 � 9 20 8 ` 200' —� • 34 o 38 3b Z� 3�O 3 32 vA��P 0 3� % 35 90 /Opp 3 90 35 � • ? P �'( 2 6 s Z. ioo rte- 3740 4 \ \ 34 • .x'20 / ' _S'tOD 790 • '3 \ � � \ � \ ' 35, 35.5 3p 9 3 3,9 \\ \ 3� C'�1 � �J L► � � J.�,� � � \ � CU.�BL/NE ST.�T/O/V��LE"I� = Eit/rE.PC/rVE•��T/O/✓/ E"� �� / � _�' o GQ E60 C ' \ 35.5 ti • ' & Rl? �l o 0362? >- `J \ \ -- .3.3.3 4 3� `�°,�� • �� �� W � � I \i�F. 36.5' -�� � \ PLANT L /S T a5 M \ 330 �w 310 /34 -� �\ Y BOL TY1� E S / ZE SPEC/ES CHOICES NOTES 6 0 3Z 33$ �_ �/ G' = l/i9GGEf/ TTEiP SHADE TREES 7-6-' HEIGHT MAPLE/ ASH, LINDEN `SYCAMORE GA k / / Oxo FLOWER/A/C I C / _ 8 R H A t//U P M Q W 8 \ TREES S Co HEIGHT 5RA OF'GRD PEA PALE/ Cl�Al3A ppL E� CHERI?Y �\ 3a. 33 CLUMP TREES � El/EI-?GPEEN Cn HEIGHT• b � S _ WHITE / RED PINE TREES BLUE / GREEN 5r->PUCE REV/SIO/V : 7-24-87CHANGED ARGJECT NAN/E TO 3 �y 3� % I HEDGEROwS 3-O 'HE/GHT REDT-WIG DOGWOODPPIVE / FORSYTHIAL1,55 Y , AUTUMNOLIVE 5EE DETAIL BELOW THE HAMLET AT CUTCHGGOE 3, �� 34 0 3 x V151.1 014 ,5P SP/ LILAC, W/NTER/3EPPV' ALL PLA 1V TS ®ARE ROOT PCVISION:I-1G -&i5 REVISED GRADING ARGLIAID _� 33 AA/IELAIVCf-/ER 1SA, sUM MERSVVEET UNIT 3 / SHRUBS 1-Co'"EIGHT MIXED EI/ERGREEN � DECIDUOUS SHRUIB,S TYPICAL HEDGEROW • G OW PLANTING DETAIL. 3 FORSYTFIIA 2 L I L A C /V O T ES S ER l/CCB ERRY GREENMAN-PEDERSEN HAMLET AT CUTCHOGUECONSULTING ENGINEERS • CONTRACTGR TO UTILIZE ALL PLANTS SPECIFIED. SITE \ ALL A R EAl S NOT DELINEATED TO BE G R AI 5.5. �- �-.��w��-�4 i� O qLL PLANTS TO 5E IIVSTALLED TO AII/IERICAN J J ASSOCIATION OF NUP3ERYMAN6TANPAC1<S. 4REDTW/G 3 VIBURNUM 3PUSSYtl/ILl_OVV PLA 1%, �' • FOR I/VDIV. BLDG. LA/VOSCAPE ,_SEE 7 Y/o1CAL UNIT DOGWOOD CAPLESI 5 rVINTERDERRY 3SUMn/IERSWEET 325 W. MAIN ST. j LANDSCAPE PL-,'11V DRAWING NQ SCALE: LDAE: SHEET NO. BABYLON N.Y. 117021It=50' 3 OF 12 TABLE OF QUANTITIES QUANTITY IMPERVIOUS AREA 419 , 175 SF NATURAL AREA 95,547 SF LANDSCAPED AREA 2541450 SF TURF AREA 10, 241, 558 SF 190 /. 44 ' 5510 /3 ' 55"E Ngo Qt 3 2 ut 1 4 � (n n s 273. Coe 7 5.,E � O 23 0 Z 0 O 27 2 2 �' 0 Cn o I� m z 26 25 24 32 D W) S 490 47 4 5 .�E 10 O GP/FF/NG STREET �1 0 3 8 28 33 21 z I �m m I - 1s 31 0 5 490 5a'35"E 0 a ' W 221 . 47 ' 14 _ _ U 16 A/4QJ0 5C9'35" I/V 400. 001 34 20 9 35 m C- m b � 29 30 0 13 17 I Q /50 ' E I Lu l,3LJFFER `./ 19 � 1U rn Oml in 0 12 18 N m0 o f1 rn — — — IV 49 37 '25" w — — ?0/0. Cot SCCA L E = l " = 100 ' ilmMLET AT CUmT%'o'.%lfl%&'pj%u'o" mumE 3 ULM IJACR AL. i EIRINATNrE LAYOUmum DRAWING NO. SCALE: DATE: 87398.00 1"=100' JUNE 1989 GREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS BABYLON, NEW YORK