HomeMy WebLinkAboutCedarfields/Mooresland Affordable Housing 1987 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
RELATING TO
THE CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROSECT AND THE MOORESLAND TOWN
HOUSES PROJECT, LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY,
NEW YORK, IN ACCORDA14CE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE V111 OF THE EN-
VIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW; PART 617 OF TITLE 6 OF THE NEW YORK
STATE CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND CHAPTER 44 OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN CODE.
LOCATION: 48.718 acres located within the Town of Southold
at the southeast corner of the intersection of Moore's
Lane and Middle Road (County Road 48)
APPLICANT: John A. Costeilo and Diane Carrol
206 Wiggins Lane and
Greenport, New York 11944 Donald Bracken
(516) 477-1393 30 Wheeler Road
Old Field,NY 11733
(516) 751-8711
LEAD AGENCY: Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1938
PREPARER: Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, New York 11944
(516) 477-0030
DATE OF PREPARATION: April 1987
April 24 , 1987
Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr .
Chairman Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold , L. I .
New York - 11971
Dear Mr . Orlowski :
In response to the Southold Town Planning Board' s request
for a Draft Environmental Impact Statement addressing the
impacts of the proposed housing projects , i . e . Cedarfields
and Mooresland , located on Moores Lane and County Road 48 at
Greenport , we are pleased to submit 15 copies of the same
for your perusal .
Sincerely ,
Donald Bracken
S�FF0(tt,
P D
'r
LD
S Y
Southold, N.Y 11971
(516) 765-1938
April 2, 1987
Mr. Merlon Wiggin
President
Peconic Associates
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Cedarfields
Affordable Housing Project
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, March 30 , 1987.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve
the sketch plan for the affordable housing proposal to be
known as Cedarfields located at Moore ' s Lane and County Route
48 , Greenport for 84 lots on 26 acres , survey dated November
24 , 1986.
Upon receipt of a preliminary application pursuant to
Sections A106-23 and A106-42, we will schedule a public hearing
on this matter.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours ,
O/Ll."u --L, �d ri,:-�,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Letter of Transmittal - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - i
SECTION I - SUMMARY
(CEDARDIELDS AND MOORESLAND)
SECTION II - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
(CEDARFIELDS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4
2 . 1 - PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4
2 . 1 . 1 - BACKGROUND AND HISTORY - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4
2 . 1 . 2 - PUBLIC NEED FOR PROJECT - - - - - - - - - - - - 9
2 . 1 . 3 - OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT SPONSOR - - - - - - - 11
2. 2 - PROJECT LOCATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12
2 . 3 - DESIGN AND LAYOUT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15
2 . 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 16
2 . 5 - APPROVALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 17
SECTION III - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
MOORESLAND - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 18
3 . 1 - PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED - - - - - - - - - - - - 18
3 . 1 . 1 - BACKGROUND AND HISTORY - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18
3 . 1 . 2 - PUBLIC NEED FOR PROJECT - - - - - - - -- - - - - 21
3 . 1 . 3 - OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT SPONSOR - - - - - - - 21
3 . 2 - PROJECT LOCATION - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - 22
3 . 3 - DESIGN AND LAYOUT - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - 24
3 . 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION - - - - - - - - - - - - 25
3 . 5 - APPROVALS - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - 25
SECTION IV - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING _ 26
(CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND) - - - - - - -
4 . 1 - THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26
4 . 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER - - - - - - - - - - -- - 26
4 . 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29
4 . 1 3 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 31
4 . 2 - HUMAN RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33
4 . 2 . 1 - TRANSPORTATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33
4 . 2 . 2 - EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING - - - - - - - - - - 36
4 . 2 . 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42
4 . 2 . 4 - DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53
4 . 2 . 5 - CULTURAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 55
SECTION V - SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 56
(CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND) - - - - - - -- -� -
SECTION VI - MITIGATION MEASURES OF MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL 58
IMPACT (CEDARFIELDS) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 . 1 - NATURAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58
6 . 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58
6 . 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59
6 . 1 3 - AIR RESOURCES - - - -- - - - - - - - - 61
6 . 1 . 4 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - 62
6 . 2 - HUMAN RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63
6 . 2 . 1 - TRANSPORTATION - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 63
6 2 2 - LAND USE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64
6 2 . 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES - - - - - - - - 65
6 2 4 - CULTURAL RESOURCES - - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - 71
6 . 2 5 - NOISE - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - 72
SECTION VII - MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT (MOORESLAND) - - - - - - - - - - - - - 73
7 . 1 - NATURAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 73
7 . 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 73
7 . 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 74
7 . 1 . 3 - AIR RESOURCES - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - 76-
7 . 1 . 4 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 77
7 . 2 - HUMAN RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 78
7 . 2 . 1 - TRANSPORTATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78
7 . 2 . 2 - LAND USE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - 79
7 . 2 . 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 80
7 . 2 . 4 - CULTURAL RESOURCES - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - 85
7 . 2 . 5 - NOISE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 86
SECTION VIII - ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT
BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED
(CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND - - - - - - - - 87
SECTION IX - ALTERNATIVES
(CEDARFIELDS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88
9 . 0 - ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES - - - - -- - -- - 88
9. 0 . 1 - SITE LAYOUT - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- 88
9 . 0 . 2 - ORIENTATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - 88
9 . 1 - ALTERNATIVE SITES - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - 89
9 . 2 - ALTERNATIVE SIZE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - 90
9 . 3 - ALTERNATIVE LAND USE - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91.
9 . 4 - NO ACTION - - - - - - - - - - - - 92
SECTION X _ ALTERNATIVES
(MOORESLAND) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94
10 . 0 - ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES - - - - - - - - 94
10 . 0 . 1 - SITE LAYOUT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94
10 . 0 . 2 - ORIENTATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94
10 . 1 - ALTERNATIVE SITES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95
10 . 2• - ALTERNATIVE SIZE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95
10 . 3 - ALTERNATIVE LAND USE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 96
10 . 4 - NO ACTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 98
SECTION XI - IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT
OF RESOURCES (CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND) - - 99
SECTION XII - GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS
(MOORESLAND) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 101
12 . 1 - POPULATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 101
SECTION XIII - EFFECTS ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF
ENERGY RESOURCES
(CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND) - - - - - - - 102
13 . 1 - PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES , CONSUMPTION AND
ALTERNATIVES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 102
13 . 2 - ENERGY CONSERVATIONS MEASURES - - - - - - - - - - 102
r
INDEX OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX NO. 1 - CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND DECLARATION
OF LEAD AGENCY AND NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT
EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT - - - - - - - A-1
APPENDIX NO. 2 - TOWN OR SOUTHOLD RESOLUTION TO
ADDRESS MATTER OF CONCERN - - - - - - - A-2 -
APPENDIX NO. 3 - CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "A" (RESIDENTIAL
AND AGRICULTURAL) TO "M" (LIGHT
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE - - - - - - - - - - - A-3
APPENDIX NO. 4 - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RESOLUTION CHANGING
A PORTION OF THE SITE FROM "M" (LIGHT
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE) TO "AHD"
(AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT) - - - - - A-4
APPENDIX NO. 5 - SITE PLAN SK-1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-5
APPENDIX NO. 6 - TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATION OF THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS - - - - - - - - A-6
APPENDIX NO 7 - E I . S . SCOPING CHECKLIST - - - - - - - -- A-7
APPENDIX NO. 8 - TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATION OF THE
TOWN HOUSE BUILDING UNITS - - - - - - - A-8
APPENDIX NO 9 TEST HOLE DATA SHEETS - - - - - - - - - A-9
APPENDIX NO . 10 - LISTING OF -OMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES - A-10
APPENDIX NO. 11 - GREENPORT WATER DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS
FOR SYSTEM SUSTAINED AND SELF-SUSTAINED
WATER SUPPLY CATEGORIES - - - - - - - - A-11
APPENDIX NO 12 - LETTER FROM SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH SERVICES ON GROUNDWATER
RECHARGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-12
APPENDIX NO. 13 - INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING TRIP GENERATION DATA - - - A-13
APPENDIX NO. 14 - AUTHORIZATION BY THE VILLAGE OF
GREENPORT BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO PREPARE
WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENTS - - - - - - A-14
APPENDIX NO. 15 - TEST WELL DATA - - - -- - - - - - - - - A-15
APPENDIX NO. 16 - DOCUMENTATION REGARDING SCHOOLS AND
EDUCATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-16
APPENDIX NO. 17 - SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD SKETCH
PLAN APPROVAL (CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE
HOUSING) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A-17
SECTION I SUMMARY (CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLANDI
This Draft Environmental Impact Statement examines the proposed
one hundred sixty-eight (168) - eighty-four (84) affordable
housing units (Cedarfields) and eighty-four (84) town house
units (Mooresland) - on some 48 . 718 acres situated on the
east side of Moore' s Lane at its intersection with County
Road 48 . This Draft Environmental Impact Statement is in
accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the
New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations ; and Chapter 44
of the Southold Town Code . The Southold Town Planning
Board, who is acting as Lead Agency, determined on March 9,
1987 and March 30 , 1987 respectively , that the actions
proposed are Type I and is likely to have a significant
effect on the environment . (See Appendix No . 1 . )
The DEIS reviews the natural and built environment of the
parcel proposed for these projects , and concludes that the
parcel is physically capable , properly-located , and with the
potential for a full complement of municipal services --
water , electrical , sewer , schools , fire and police
protection , etc . -- to undergo residential development of
the type and density forecast without significant impact or
detriment to natural or man-made systems , or the surrounding
development and land uses . In particular , the demands for
1
municipal water and sewer service vital to achieve the
development objective of creating a quality environment for
both moderate income housing and mid-cost town houses while
protecting the natural environment are available and
deliverable, subject to approval by the Greenport Village
Board whose Village Utility Systems have the capability to
service both projects with water and sewer .
The DEIS further examines alternatives to both the proposed
projects on the subject parcel , and its subsequent maximum
development of 168 dwelling units (84 affordable dwelling
units and 84 town houses) including the following:
Consideration of alternative sites, alternative size or
scale of development , alternative land use , and impacts of
the "no action" alternative . The D. E . I . S. concludes that
there are no significant environmental impacts pertaining to
the proposed action or subsequent intended development that
would necessitate the pursuit of any of these alternatives .
The proposed action and subsequent development of 168 dwelling
unity upon the receipt of the required approvals , will
result in :
2
1 . An increase in affordable housing and town house type of
units .
2 . No increase in protective service staff and equipment .
3 . No loss of farmland .
4 . No significant pollution of groundwater .
5 . A connection to Village supplied utility services - water ,
and sewage - within existing plant capabilities.
6 . An increase in tax revenues without a significant increase in
demand for taxpayer provided services .
7 . An increase in school population without a corresponding
significant increase in facilities and operating costs .
B . An increase in traffic volume that can be accommodated by the
existing road and street networks .
9 . Potential for developing a significant on-site source of
potable water that would augment the Village ' s municipal
water supply .
3
SECTION II • DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
(CEDARPIELDS)
The proposed project involves the major sub-division of
26. 45 Acres of the approximate total of 48 . 718 Acres , and
the construction of eighty-four (84) affordable housing
units complete with streets and support utilities of water ,
sewer , electrical , telephone , and cable television .
2 . 1 - PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
2 . 1 . 1 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
This particular piece of property has considerable past
history of being recommended for use for affordable type
housing . The previous owner , East End Associates , submitted
a petition on November 7 , 1984 to the Southold Town Board in
accordance with Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code ,
requesting the annexation of approximately 48 . 718 Acres from
the unincorporated portion of the Town of Southold into the
Incorporated Village of Greenport .
4
Upon such annexation , and in accordance with the zoning
ordinance of the Village of Greenport , this parcel would be
zoned as R-1 Residential District , with the minimum lot size
of ten thousand (10 ,000) square feet or approximately one-
quarter Acre . John Costello acquired the subject parcel on
February 15 , 1985 and became the SuccesEor In Interest of
East End Associates .
The Southold Town Board and the Village of Greenport
conducted a public hearing on the annexation petition on
December 6 , 1984 and on January B . 1985 . The Southold Town
Board determined , in its role as Lead Agency , that the
proposed annexation is a Type I action and was likely to
have a significant impact on the environment . According and
pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State
Codes , Rules and Regulations the Southold Town Board advised
the petitioner that the preparation and filing of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement would be necessary prior to
further consideration of the annexation petition . A Draft
Environmental Impact Statement was submitted in March of
1985 , a copy of which is available at Southold Town Hall .
5
A public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
relative to the annexation was held on May 16 , 1985 After
completion of the public hearing and review by Southold Town
Board , the Town Board in its role as Lead Agency determined
that the applicant , John A. Costello be requested to prepare
a Final Environmental Impact Statement that would address
nine (9) "matters of concern" specifically identified within
said resolution . (See Appendix No . 2 . )
Consistent with the Town Board' s request a Final
Environmental Impact Statement was prepared that contained
response to all of the particular comments on the Draft
Environmental Statement received either in writing during
the comment period of March 14 to April 14 , 1985 , or during
the public hearing conducted on May 16 , 1985 , or as further
stated in the Town Board ' s June 4 , 1985 resolution . The
Final Environmental Impact Statement was submitted as an
addendum to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on June
17 , 1985 . On July 30 , 1985 the Town Board voted to deny the
applicant ' s request for annexation to the Village of
Greenport .
6
Subsequent to the denial of the applicant ' s request for
annexation , John A. Costello submitted a petition on August
15 , 1985 to the Southold Town Board in accordance with
Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code . This petition
requested the zoning from "A" (Residential and Agricultural )
to "M" (Light Multiple-Residence) of approximately 48 . 718
acres situated on the east side of Moore ' s Lane at its
intersection with County Road 48 , or otherwise identified as
the same parcel listed for the presently proposed action .
Mr . Costello's purpose in requesting the rezoning of subject
property from "A" (Residential) to "M" (Light Multiple
Residential) in his petition of August 1985 is quoted , as
follows :
"This petitioner is desirous of having the zoning status of
the property changed so as to allow the property to be
developed from multiple residence use . With such a zoning
status this petitioner can undertake the construction and
marketing of multiple residence units at a price to the
public that will assist in helping fill the existing
residential demand for "moderate income" housing . In this
manner the Town will be better able to attract and retain
workers of a more modest income than that of the ' second '
homeowners who are able to afford houses on two acre sites . "
7
On September 24 , 1985 , the Southold Town Board determined , in its
role as Lead Agency , that the proposed action is a Type 1 action
that is "likely to have a significant effect on the
environment" , and that the filing of a Draft Environmental
would be necessary prior to the Town Board's final
consideration of the petition for a rezoning . Such Draft
Environmental Impact Statement relating to said rezoning was
prepared in October 1985 .
Said petition for a change of zone was duly referred to the
Planning Board , recommendations , and report , and after its
report had been with the Town Board , and thereafter a public
hearing in relation to said petition being held by the Town
Board on October 29 , 1965 , it was resolved by resolution
that the granting of the petition for said parcel to be
changed from "A" (Residential and Agricultural ) to "M"
(Light Multiple Residential ) as of December 3 , 1985 . (See
Appendix No 3 . )
During this same period the Town was in the preparation of
developing a new Master Plan with one of its goals , among
many others , to make provisions for affordable housing for
moderate income families . Subsequently , Local Law No . 6 was
enacted by the Town Board of Southold that amended Section
100-20 of Chapter 100 of the Code of the Town of Southold by
adding the following new district designation of "AHD"
(Affordable Housing District) .
8
On February 27 , 1987 , the Southold Town Board , as a result
of a petition filed with the Town Board by John A. Costello
by resolution granted a change of a portion of the 48 . 718
Acres from "M" (Light Multiple Residence) to "AHD"
(Affordable Housing) on January 20 , 1987 . (See Appendix No . 4) .
2 . 1 . 2 - PUBLIC NEED FOR PROJECT
The need for affordable housing, especially for the working
class of the Town of Southold and the Village of Greenport ,
has been frequently and continually expressed, both by
elected officials , the public , and the press. This need for
affordable housing was especially made known during the
public hearing of May 16 , 1985 in regard to the proposed
annexation . Pages 41 and 42 of the F. E. I . S . that summarized
this need is quoted as follows :
"3 . 70 Public Hearing
The main point emphasized at the public hearing was the
expressed need for adequate and moderate income housing
in the Town of Southold . Speakers correctly envisioned
the annexation as a means to make possible affordable
housing for the working class residents of the Village
of Greenport and the Town of Southold . The following
businesses and residents expressed their individual
concern about the lack of affordable housing and
commented in support of the annexation :
9
David Mudd
Shirley Crocker
George Wetmore
Whitey Skrezek
William J . Mills
George Penney IV
Norma Miller (representing the Greenport-Southold
Chamber of Commerce)
James Dinizio , Jr .
Dennis Coyle
Glenn Moeller
Arthur Levine ( former Village of Greenport Mayor )
Chuck Stabile
Bob Mills
Louis Sacks
Bill Mueller
Gene Canswick
Dan Blaisley
Fred Schoenstein
Erik Heins
Bill Golder
Ruth Oliva (President of the North Fork Environmental
Council - with some qualifications . )"
The need also has been specifically recognized by the
Southold Town Board by its own act in creating a Town of
Southold Zone Designation of Affordable Housing District
10
2 . 1 . 3 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT SPONSOR
The project sponsor , John A. Costello , owner , and developers
Diane Carrol and Donald Bracken , have as an overall
objective to create a well-planned , properly-seviced,
conveniently-located , and affordable housing units near the
Village of Greenport . These proposed housing units provide
an opportunity for a younger family to find an affordable ,
municipally-serviced house so that they and their family
could remain on the North Fork , and as a secondary result
help stabilize and potentially increase both the labor force
and the buying population for businesses in the Town of
Southold .
11
2 . 2 - PROJECT LOCATION
The subject Affordable Housing Zone occupies the Eastern and
Southern portion of the previously described 48 . 718 Acre
parcel which , in its entirely , lies at the corner formed by
the intersection of the southerly side of County Road 48
and the easterly side of Moore ' s Lane and as shown on
proposed site plan , SK-1 , Parcel - B , prepared by Charles E.
Egosi , Architect , Main Street , Sag Harbor , New York ,dated
November 24 , 1986 (see Appendix No . 5) . The Affordable
Housing Project site is within the Town of Southold , County
of Suffolk , State of New York , and is more particularly
described as follows :
BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of
the Southerly side of North Road , also known as Middle
Road or County Road 48 , with the Westerly side of the
property of Arthur Nichols and land now or formerly of
Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet , now and formerly known
as Fleetfield ;
RUNNING THENCE South 16 degrees 01 mimutes 50 seconds
East along said direction for a distance 1451 06 feet ;
12
RUNNING THENCE South 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
West along Northern boundary of the Village of
Greenport , 713 . 30 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE South 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds
West along land of the Village of Greenport to monument
at the intersection of property of the Village of
Greenport and Moores Lane ;
RUNNING THENCE North 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
West to a new monument separating the new Affordable
Housing District from the remaining"M" Zone parcel ;
THENCE North 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East
along said boundary between the Affordable Housing
District and "M" Zone for 635 . 03 feet ;
THENCE North 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 degrees seconds
East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing
District and "M" Zone for 132 . 97 feet ;
THENCE North 16 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West
along said boundary between the Affordable Housing
District and "M" Zone for 1 ,254 . 09 feet to South side
of North Road or County Road 48 ;
13
THENCE running North 69 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds
East along Southern boundary of County Road 48 ;
THENCE North 71 degrees 28 minutes 20 seconds East
along Southern boundary of County Road 48 , 312 . 65 feet
to point or place of BEGINNING.
The access to this Affordable Housing Site is as shown on
the previously described site plan and includes street
access from the West at Moores Lane , from the East at
Washington Avenue , and from Bennett Road , both extensions
off Middleton Road .
14
2 . 3 DESIGN AND LAYOUT
The total site area for this Affordable Housing Project is
one million one hundred fifty-two thousand two hundred
seventy-one (1 , 152 ,271 ) square feet , or approximately 26 . 4
Acres . The site will be sub-divided into eighty-four (84)
individual house lots , each comprising of approximately ten
thousand (10 ,000) square feet . Also included in this site
is a potable water well site which is proposed to be deeded
to the Village of Greenport to supplement their existing
Municipal water supply .
Clearing is to be limited to the actual housing site
locations with provisions made for natural growth , to be
supplemented with additional plantings to provide buffer
areas between the Affordable Housing Site and the "M" Zone
town house sites (Cedarfields and Mooresland) , as well as
also a buffer between the site and County Road 48 .
Streets are proposed to be twenty-eight (28) feet wide
constructed in accordance with the Town of Southold Highway
Specifications , and to include continuous recharge swales on
either side as well as leaching pools in each low section of
the street , both of which are designed to take full
advantage of the recharge capability of the well drained
soil on this particular site .
15
Individual housing units , comprising of approximately eight
hundred fifty (858) square feet , are to be constructed in
accordance with designs submitted to , and recommended by the
Town of Southold . Floor plan and typical elevation of units
are depicted as Appendix No . 6 . Each housing unit is to be
serviced by Greenport Village (water and sewer ) , Long Island
Lighting Company (electrical) , New York Telephone , and
Dimension Cable (TV) . To preserve and enhance the asthetic
appearance of the site , all utility services are to be
placed underground . Paved driveways will be constructed to
each individual housing unit of size and length to
accommodate two (2) vehicles each .
2 . 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
Construction of the eighty-four (84 ) housing units will
complete the available yield of this Affordable Housing
site . It is anticipated that the construction period will
be completed within eighteen (18) months after commencement ,
with the goal to initiate the construction of the first
units in the summer or fall of this calendar year .
16
2 . 5 APPROVALS
In addition to the acceptance of this Draft Environmental
Impact Statement as meeting the total requirements of the
Scoping Checklist (see Appendix No . 7) , other approvals that
are required include the following :
o Planning Board - Town of Southold , to include both
preliminary and final plat .
o Sub-Division Approval - Suffolk County .
o Completion of contract negotiations with the Village of
Greenport to provide water and sewer service .
o Agreement with Long Island Lighting Company to provide
the electrical service .
o Agreement with New York Telephone to provide
underground telephone service .
o Agreement with Dimension Cable to provide TV service .
o Approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health
Service of the water and sewer services layout and design .
o Building Permit from the Town of Southold .
17
SECTION III • DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
(MOORESLAND)
The proposed project involves the development of
approximately 22 Acres of the approximate total of 48 . 718
Acres , and the construction of eighty-four (84 ) town houses
in the mid-cost range complete with access streets and
support utilities of water , sewer , electrical , telephone ,
and cable television .
3 . 1 - PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
3. 1 . 1 - BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
Particular reference is made to Section 2 . 1 . 1 , which
describes and delineates the background and history of the
total project site , ending in a portion thereof being
rezoned to an Affordable Housing District (AHD) .
In August 1985 , Mr . Costello , owner of this property ,
petitioned Southold Town requesting the rezoning of the
total property from "A" (Residential ) to "M" (Light Multiple
Residential ) . The resolution granting this change of zone
was made on December 3 , 1985 . Reference is made to Appendix
No . 3 .
18
On February 27 , 1987 , the Southold Town Board , by
Resolution , granted a change of a portion of the total site
from the "M" (Light Multiple Residence) to "AHD" (Affordable
Housing) . Section 100-55 . 7 , General Regulation Requirements
of the Affordable Housing District . contains the following
provision :
"c. Provision For Moderate Income Family Dwelling
Units And Unimproved Lots.
(1) On land within an AHD District containing ten
(10) acres or less of land , not less than for
(40$) percent of the dwelling units and/or
unimproved lots located therein shall be
reserved for sale or lease to moderate income
families .
(2) On land within an AHD District containing
more than ten (10) acres of land , the number
of dwelling units and unimproved lots
therein , to be reserved for sale or lease to
moderate income families shall be as follows :
(a) Not less than ten (10%) percent of the
dwelling units shall be reserved for
lease to moderate income families .
19
(b) Not less than ten (10%) percent of the
dwelling units shall be attached
dwelling units reserved for sale to
moderate income families.
(c) Not less than twenty (20$) percent of
the dwelling units shall be one-family
detached dwelling units reserved for
sale to moderate income families .
(d) Not less than ten (10%) percent of the
unimproved lots therein shall be
reserved for sale to moderate income
families . "
This revision summary on land with AHD Districts that
contain more than ten (10 ) Acres requires that fifty percent
(50$) of the dwelling units be reserved for moderate income
families-. The expressed intent of this fifty/fifty (50/50)
division is that a larger percentage of the overall site
developement costs can be borne by the other Residential
District , making the development of Moderate Income family
dwelling units more of an economic reality .
20
3 . 1 . 2 - PUBLIC. NEED FOR PROJECT
The need for mid-cost range type town houses is best shown
by the rapid sale of similar type units at other locations
within the Town of Southold . Since the public has been
aware of the plans to construct such a housing facility , the
owner and developer have already received a long list of
prospective applicants and purchasers .
3 . 1 . 3 - OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT SPONSOR
The developers , Diane Carrol and Donald Bracken, have as an
overall objective to create a well planned , properly
serviced , conveniently located , mid-cost range town house
type development near the Village of Greenport . These
proposed housing units will provide an opportunity for a
middle income family to realize a goal of a municipal
serviced housing units within the Town of Southold . These
units are expected to fulfill a particular need of the
middle income families that , because of income , could not
qualify for the Affordable Housing units , and at the other
end of the scale not be able to afford a two (2) to three
( 3) Acre lot and residence .
A second result would be the stabilization and the potential
increase in the labor force population for businesses in the
Town of Southold
21
3 . 2 - PROJECT LOICATION
The town house portion of the project occupies the Western
portion of the previously described 48 . 718 Acre parcel , as
shown on the proposed Site Plan , SK-1 , prepared by Charles
E . Egosi , Architect , Main Street , Sag Harbor , New York ,
dated November 24 , 1986 . (See Appendix No . 5 . ) The town
house project site is within the Town of Southold , County of
Suffolk , State of New York , is more particularly described
as follows :
"BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of
the southerly side of North Road , also known as Middle
Road or County Route 48 , with the Easterly side of
Moores Lane ;
RUNNING THENCE North 66 degrees 09 minutes 10 seconds
East , slong said southerly side of North Road , 96 . 61
feet ;
RUNNING THENCE Norty 69 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds
East still along said southerly side of North Road ,
645 . 97 feet ;
22
RUNNING THENCE South 16 degrees 01 minutes 30 seconds
East along said last mentioned land and along land now
designated as the new Affordable Housing District ,
12 ,254 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE South 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
West along said mentiond land , 13 , 297 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE South 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds
West still along said last mentioned land 635 . 00 feet
to the easterly side of Moores Lane ;
RUNNING THENCE North 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
West along said easterly side of Moores Lane 1808 . 03
feet to the corner , the point or place of BEGINNING . "
The subject parcel was acquired by John A. Costello from
East End Associates by deed dated January 28 , 1985 and
recorded in the office of the Suffolk County Clerk on
February 28 , 1985 , in Liber 9744 at Page 117 .
23
3 . 3 - DESIGN AND LAYOUT
The total site area for this mid-income range town house
project is nine hundred sixty-nine thousand four hundred
twenty-five (969 , 425) square feet , or approximately twenty-
two (22) Acres . Reference is made to proposed Site Plan ,
SK-1 , Parcel - A. (See Appendix No . 5 . ) The site will
contain a total of twenty-one (21) buildings with each
building containing four (4) residential units of
approximately twelve hundred fifty (1250) square feet each .
Also included in this site , for the use of its occupants ,
will be two (2) tennis courts , swimming pool , and
combination bath and club house.
Clearing is to be limited to actual building sites with
provisions to be made for preserving and adding to the
natural growth , so as to result in significant sized buffer
areas between the affordable housing site and along County
Road 46 and Moores Lane .
Access streets in the development are proposed to be twenty
(20) feet wide , complete with curbs and designated parking
areas . Storm and surface drainage will be collected and
piped to three (3) naturalistic collection and recharge
basins .
24
The twenty-one (21 ) town house buildings are to be
constructed in accordance with the typical floor and
elevation , as depicted in Appendix No . B . Each building is
to be serviced by Greenport Village (water and sewer ) , Long
Island Light Company (electrical ) , New York Telephone , and
Dimension Cable (TV) . To preserve and enhance the asthetic
appearance of the town house site , all utility services are
to be placed underground .
3 . 4 - CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION
It is anticipated that the construction of the twenty-one
(21 ) buildings (84 town house units) will be commenced at
approximately the same time as the eighty-four (84)
individual Affordable Housing Units . It is further
anticipated that the construction period will be completed
within approximately two (2) years after commencement .
3 . 5 - APPROVALS
Reference is made to Section 2 . 5 , Approvals for the Affordable
Housing . In addition to the acceptance to this Draft Environmental
Impact Statement , which is prepared as a combined requirement
for both projects , reference is made to Scoping Check List (see
Appendix No . 7 ) . The other approvals required are expected to be
the same number and type as those for the Affordable Housing Project
25
SECTION IV• ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
4 . 1 - THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
The principal natural resources which contribute to the
environmental setting or context of a particular site are its
geology , water resources , and terrestrial ecology .
4 . 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY AND GROUNDWATER
The geology of the parcel proposed for this development is
considered typical of the geology found throughout Southold
Township. Upper Pleistocene deposits form the overall land
mass of the North Fork , consisting of stratified sands and
gravels with some thin beds of clay encountered . These
Upper Pleistocene deposits range to approximately 200 feet
below sea level .
The soil for this site is classified as Riverhead Series
RvA, whose characteristics include good granular material
below a depth of twenty-seven (27) inches , with rapid
permeabili ' in gravel at a depth of twenty-two (22) to
thirty-six (36) inches . The soil characteristics of the
Riverhead Series makes it ideal for water recharge below the
topsoil level . These soils also are characterized by yielding
very little run-off during precipitation periods . Reference
is made to soils test hole data sheets . (See Appencix No . 9 . )
26
The United States Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Soil Survey of Suffolk County , New York has the
following information on the Riverhead Series of soils :
"Riverhead Series which consists of deep , well drained ,
moderately course , textured soils that formed in a
mantle of sandy loam, or fine sandy loam over thick
layers of course sand and gravel . Native vegetation
consists of black oak , red oak , white oak , and scrub
oak . Riverhead soils have moderate to high available
moisture capacity , and internal drainage is good .
Permeability is rapid in the surface layer and sub-
soil , and very rapid is the sub-strata . Natural
fertility is low. This soil is well suited to all
crops commonly grown in the County and is also used
extensively for housing development and industrial
parks . "
The upper levels of these Pleistocene deposits contain fresh
water and are the primary source of groundwater within the
Town of Southold . Water table elevations within these
deposits generally lie in the Greenport vicinity at 2 to 3
feet above mean sea level . Based upon a topographic
analysis of the parcel proposed for rezoning , it can be
assumed that the water table generally lies some 5 to 20
27
feet beneath this 48 . 718 acre tract , with an average depth
to the water table of approximately 15 feet A test well
installed on June 13, 1985 on the southern end of the site
showed depth to ground water if eleven (11 ) feet .
The parcel proposed for this development is characterized as
gently rolling , with slopes of 0 to 3% and with elevations
generally ranging from 8 feet above mean sea level at an
isolated low point along its western , or Moore' s Lane ,
boundary to some 22 feet in elevation in its northeast
quadrant . Positive drainage occurs naturally throughout the
site . See Appendix No . 5 - Site Plan SK-1 .
28
4 . 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES
Groundwater , as previously discussed , is the principal water
resource of concern in an area such as Long Island that has
been classified by the EPA as being fully dependent upon a
sole , or single , source for its potable water supply . This
designation reinforces the in-place planning criteria and
monitoring activities that are utilized to ensure that the
groundwater not be contaminated by either point- or non-
point sources of pollution. The concern is even more
critical in the Town of Southold and Village of Greenport
for , unlike many other areas of Long Island , potable water
supply is not available here from both the Glacial and
Magothy aquifers . Water underlying Southold within the
Magothy formation is generally too saline for potable use .
Surface water resources within the vicinity of the proposed
project , though not contained within the parcel , are Moore ' s
Drain and Silver Lake , located approximately 1000 feet to
the southeast . Water quality classification for these
surface waters has been established by NYS DEC as follows :
- Moore ' s Drain (tidal portion ) SC
- Moore ' s Drain (non-tidal portion ) D
- Silver Lake D
29
Under the DEC water quality classification system, SC waters
are described as "suitable for fishing and all other uses
except for primary contact recreation and for the taking of
shellfish for market purposes" . Class D waters are termed
"suitable for secondary recreation , but due to such natural
conditions as intermittency of flow, water conditions not
conducive to the propagation of game fishery, or stream bed
conditions , the waters will not support the propagation of fish" .
While substantial areas of the Town of Southold Village of
Greenport are designated as flood hazard areas by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, the elevations present
on the parcel proposed for development cause it to be
located fully outside the flood hazard area. In addition,
there are no designated wetlands on or immediately adjacent
to the subject parcel , though several wetland areas have
been identified by the NYS Department of Environmental
Conservation within the vicinity . These wetland areas ,
subject to the permit authority of DEC, are as follows :
- Silver Lake located to the southeast of the site ,
- much of the Moore ' s Woods/Moore ' s Drain area owned by the
Village of Greenport ; and
- an area approximately . 5 miles east of the parcel at the
southwest corner of State Route 25 and County Road 48 ,
just north of the Village of Greenport .
30
4 . 1 . 3 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
The parcel proposed for development is characterized by
secondary vegetation that has begun to reclaim an area of
earlier agricultural crop and/or pasture use . The tree
growth is young and sparse throughout most of the site , with
some denser vegetation noted in its north , particularly
along County Road 48 . Species encountered include the
following:
- locust Robinia pseudoacacia
- maple Acer sp.
- red cedar Juniperus virginia
- grey birch Betula populifdia
- white birch Betula populifdia
- oak Quercus velutina
- poplar Populus
- pine Pinus
The maple , poplar and second growth locust are predominant .
White pine is found along the parcel ' s southern edge , and begins
to screen limited portions of the site from the McCann Trailer
Park . Native grasses provide groundcover throughout the parcel ,
except where disturbed by an informal vehicular accessway and
various dirt bike trails .
Adjacent residential properties are as typically experienced ,
i . e . landscaped lawns , planted shrubbery , and a variety of common
trees such as maple and oaks .
31
Animal life occupying the site are largely those small species
associated with near-residential and open field conditions .
Representative species either observed on-site or recorded in the
literature include the following:
- Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus
- Eastern gray squirrel
- Meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus
Various birdlife is also commonly found on and adjacent to the
subject parcel . These include sparrows , robins , flickers ,
blackbirds , chickadees, starlings, as well as other similar
birdlife .
No rare , threatened or endangered species of plant , animal or
birdlife are known to occur on the parcel .
32
4 . 2 - HUMAN RESOURCES
The principal human or built resources which contribute to the
environmental setting or context of a particular site are its
transportation accessibility , existing land use and zoning
controls which guide its future development , the community
services and facilities available at the location, its
demographic context and cultural resources that may be present .
4 . 2 . 1 - TRANSPORTATION
The principal transportation arteries servicing the North
Fork of Long Island are Middle or North Road (County Road
48) and Main Road (New York State Route 25) . Route 25 , an
east-west roadway , is a two-lane improved roadway passing
through the hamlet centers of the North Fork , including
Mattituck , Cutchogue and Southold within the Town of
Southold , and the Village of Greenport . Middle or North
Road (County Road 48) , also an east-west artery , runs along
the northern section of the North Fork . County Road 48 is a
four-lane roadway from Mattituck to Southold and a two-lane
roadway from Southold to Greenport . Moores Lane , designated
by the New York State Department of Transportation as Truck
Route 25 , serves as a north-south connector between State
33
Route 25 and County Road 48 , and allows traffic proceeding
to or from the East Marion and Orient Point hamlets east of
Greenport to bypass the narrow streets and congestion that
may be encountered during seasonal peaks within the Village
of Greenport's downtown business district .
Traffic counts undertaken by the New York State Department
of Transportation indicate that average annual daily traffic
(AADT) on Route 25 west of Greenport is 7 ,050 vehicles , with
the AADT of Middle Road (County Road 48) just northwest of
Greenport being 6 ,000 vehicles , based on 1981 data compiled
by Suffolk County . More current New York State Department
of Transportation traffic data gives a 1984 traffic count of
seven thousand four hundred fifty (7 ,450) vehicles per day
between Oaklawn Avenue , Southold , and Route 114 in
Greenport . The latest Route 25 traffic count between Route
114 and Manhasset Avenue was five thousand fifty (5 , 050) .
As this count was accomplished in 1979 , an update is
scheduled for this year , according to New York State
Department of Transportation planners . According to the
Suffolk County Departm—it of Traffic Safety and acceptable
engineering standards , an improved two-lane roadway can
readily accommodate an AADT of 10 , 000 vehicles ; both State
25 and County Road 48 have AADTs well below this level .
34
Other modes of transportation to the North Fork include
ferry , train , bus and air service . Direct access to the
South Fork of Long Island by way of Shelter Island is
available on a regular basis from Greenport via the North
Ferry, Inc . and the South Ferry . In addition , the Cross
Sound Ferry, located some 8 miles east of Greenport ,
provides a direct route to New England for automobiles ,
trucks and walk-on passengers .
Passenger rail service to Greenport is limited to two (2)
trains eastbound and two (2) trains westbound per day , with
more frequent bus-train service . Sunrise Coach Lines , Inc .
provides direct bus service from Greenport to New York City
- three round-trips per day. Kennedy International Airport
is located 90 miles west of Greenport , while Long Island ' s
MacArthur Airport and Suffolk County' s Airport at
Westhampton are , respectively , 48 and 30 miles distant .
The parcel proposed for development has 1523 . 22 feet of
frontage on Moore' s Lane , 1394 . 35 feet of frontage on County
Road 48 , and has access on its east from the stub ends of
Washington Street and Bennett Road , located within the Town
of Southold .
35
4 . 2 . 2 - EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING
The 48 . 718 acre parcel proposed for development is a tract
of vacant land , once reputedly farmed , that supports no
improvements and that has become overgrown in recent years
since the cessation of agricultural use. The tract borders
on its south and west lands owned by the Village of
Greenport , including the Moore's Lane right-of-way .
Immediately to the east and across County Road 48 to the
north lie privately-owned and improved residential lots
within the Town of Southold .
Immediately to the West , and owned by the Village of
Greenport , is a portion of a 240 acre parcel commonly
referred to as "Moore' s Woods" , an extensive woodland area
acquired for watershed protection , recreational use , and
municipal utility functions . Moore ' s Woods includes a 100
acre section designated as the "Greenport Nature Study
Area" , a shallow creek (Moore' s Drain) that was developed in
the 1860 ' s to drain the mosquito swamps surrounding the
Village , and facilities for the Village ' s water supply ,
sewage disposal and electric utilities .
36
Immediately to the south of the parcel proposed for
development is the Village-operated McCann Trailer Park , a
facility first developed in 1974 to provide seasonal trailer
and recreational vehicle sites for visitors to the Greenport/
Southold vicinity. 55 existing sites are provided , with
expansion contemplated to provide 20 additional sites , thus
fully occupying the available land area between the subject
parcel on its north and Moore' s Drain on its south. Across
Moore' s Lane from the subject parcel lie Village water plant
No. 3 at the southeast corner of North Road and Moore's
Lane , the Village's sewage treatment plant , and its recently
constructed scavenger waste treatment facility . Also sited
on the Village's lands along the . 8 mile length of Moore' s
Lane are water plant No . 2 (not in use) and the Village's
electric generating plant .
The residential development immediately east of the parcel
proposed for development is discussed in the February 1981
Section 201 Wastewater Facility Plan for the Village of
Greenport and Town of Southold as an area with potential
need for sewers . Some 160 dwelling units occupy 45 acres of
land in this North Greenport area at a density of
approximately 3 . 5 dwelling units per acre , serviced only by
municipal water with sewage disposal accommodated on-site .
37
A similar , or perhaps slightly higher , density is
experienced on Middletown and Madison Streets which are
developed with single-family detached homes on individual
lots and located nearest the subject parcel . Residential
development to the north of County Road 48 (Eastern Shores)
extends for approximately 2 , 000 to 2 ,400 feet to the shore
of Long Island Sound. Average density of this development
is three (3) dwelling units per acre.
The subject parcel is currently zoned a combination of "M"
(Light Multiple Residence) and "AHD" (Affordable Housing) .
The recently established Affordable Housing District is a
result of the amendment of Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code
of the Town of Southold to provide a new Article VA, to
provide the following:
it ARTICLE VA
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT
Section 100-55 . 1 - Purpose .
The purpose of the Affordable Housing District is to provide
the opportunity within certain areas of the Town for the
development of high density housing for families of moderate
income .
38
Section 110-55 . 3 - Applicability .
AHD Districts shall be established by application to the
Town Board pursuant to the procedures hereinafter specified,
on parcels of land located within the following areas :
A. Land within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the post
offices located in the hamlets of Mattituck , Cutchogue ,
Peconic and Southold.
B. Land within one-quarter (1/4) mile radius of the post
offices located in the hamlets of East Marion and
Orient .
C. Land within one-quarter (1/4) mile of the boundaries of
the Incorporated Village of Greenport .
D . Land in such other areas as shall be designated by Town
Board resolution after a public hearing thereon , upon
ten (10) days notice thereof by publication in the
official Town newspapers .
39
Section 100-55 . 4 - Use Regulations.
In the AHD District , no building or premises shall be used ,
and no building or part of a building shall be erected or
altered which is arranged , intended or designed to be used ,
in whole or in part , for any use except the following :
A. Permitted uses :
1 . One-family detached dwelling
2 . Two-family dwelling.
3 . Multiple dwellings .
B. Accessory uses.
Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by Section
100-30C (1 ) , (2) , (3) , (4) , (6) , and (7) of this
Chapter . "
That portion of the site , approximately twenty-two (22)
acres , which is zoned "M" (Light Multiple Residence )
District , permits the following types and densities of
residential developments :
40
"A. Permitted uses , subject to site plan approval of the
Planning Board in accordance with Article XIII hereof .
(1) Any permitted use set forth in , and as regulated
by , Section 100-30A of this chapter .
(2) Multiple dwellings not exceeding one hundred
twenty-five (125) feet in length designed for and
occupied by not more than four (4) families .
(3) Boarding- and tourist houses.
B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of
Appeals . The following uses are permitted as a special
exception by the Board of Appeals , as hereinafter
provded , and subject to site plan approval by the
Planning Board in accordance with Article XIII hereof :
(1) Any special exception use set forth in , and as
regulated by , Section 100-30B of this chapter . "
The references Section 100-30A permits "one family detached
dwellings , not to exceed one (1 ) dwelling on each lot" , while the
referenced Section 100-30B authorized by special permit "Two-
family dwellings , conversion of existing dwellings and new
construction , not to exceed one ( 1 ) such dwelling on each lot" .
Minimum lot size within the "M" District , as stated in the "Bulk
and Parking Schedule" is 40 , 000 square feet
41
4 . 2 . 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
A. Educational Facilities. The proposed development lies
within Greenport Union Free School District No . 10 . The
District operates an elementary and high school , both
located in a single building on Route 25 (Front Street) ,
just outside the Village limits within the Town of
Southold , and approximately . 6 miles from the subject
parcel . Total 1986-1987 enrollment in grades K-12 was
573 , according to data provided by the Superintendent of
Schools (see Appendix No . 16) , far short of the stated
capacity of 1 ,191 students indicated in a 1984 report by
the New York State Department of Education .
An annual decline in pupil enrollment has been recorded in
each of the past 10 school years , with the following
enrollment figures reported by the District :
YEAR PUPIL ENROLLMENT
1975-76 896
1976-77 881
1977-78 849
1978-79 817
1979-80 783
1980-81 715
1981-82 687
1982-83 670
1983-84 660
1984-85 621
1985-86 610
1986-87 573
42
The School District has , thus , experienced an enrollment
decline of about 30$ during the past decade, with school
district officials contemplating that further decline will
continue for the next several years .
The 1986-1987 taxable assessed valuation within District No .
10 for school purposes was $12 ,784 , 476 . 00 . A tax rate of
$270 . 30/$1 , 000 . 00 assessed valuation was applied in order to
raise $3, 456 ,257 . 00 in revenues . The total cost per
pupil , including building , maintenance , and
administrative costs , much of which is fixed and beyond
direct pupil costs , was $5 ,611 . 00 during 1986-1987.
Direct educational cost per pupil was , of course , lower ,
but exact figures are not available.
B . Police Protection . Police protection to the proposed
development is a responsibility of the Southold Town Police ,
though Moore' s Lane , on which the parcel fronts , is a
Village thoroughfare . In any event , the Town of Southold
maintains a full-time police department , as does the
Village of Greenport . State Police protection is available
from the nearest substation of Troop L in Islip Terrace .
43
C. Fire Protection . The proposed development is located
within the Town-Outside-Village area of the Greenport
East-West Fire Protection District . This District is an
extension of the Village Fire Department , which
maintains two fire stations , a principal , modern
facility on Third Street in Greenport and a secondary
location on Flint Street . Each station is conveniently
located to the proposed development site , and a full
range of equipment and rescue squad personnel are available .
D. Health Care Facilities. The Eastern Long Island Regional
Hospital is located on Manor Place within the Village of
Greenport , providing both scheduled and emergency medical
services on a 24-hour per day basis . In addition to a full
complement of local medical , dental and related personnel ,
Greenport area residents are also served by the Central
Suffolk Hospital some 28 miles distant in Riverhead , and the
Riverhead Health and Mental Health Centers.
E . Social Services . There are an abundance of Social
Service Organizations available in the local area that
range from animal shelters , consumer services , legal
facilities , employment agencies , housing , human rights ,
public assistance , tax information , veterans , and voter
service organizations . A complete list of each of these ,
by locale and phone numbers is listed as Appendix No . 10 .
44
F. Recreational Facilities . The Town of Southold and
Village of Greenport offer a variety of recreational
opportunities for its permanent residents and seasonal
visitors . Representative of the more than 900 acres of
parkland and preserve available for passive and active
recreation are the following facilities :
NAME AND LOCATION APPROX . ACREAGE
Orient Beach State Park at Orient 357
Goldsmith' s Inlet Park at Southold 34
Inlet Point Pond Park at Greenport 36
Great Pond (Peconic) at Southold 37
Moore ' s Woods Nature Study Area 101
Greenport Village Parks (Third Street ,
Fifth Street and Curt Breeze Field) 24
Many of these facilities , including Moore ' s Woods and the
Village 's community recreational facilities at both Curt
Breeze Memorial Field and the District No . 10 school
complex are within easy walking distance of the proposed
development .
G. Water Supply . The Village of Greenport maintains a 15
square mile franchise area which extends from the east
side of Shipyard Lane in East Marion to Peconic Lane in
Peconic , including the Bayview peninsula in Southold .
45
The proposed development lies within this franchise
area . Water is provided by six (6) operating well
fields , with a population of approximately 8 , 100 (2 , 500
service connections) presently serviced .
The total Village water plant capacity is calculated at
3 . 92 mgd per day. Allowing a reserve of 1 , 300 ,000 gpd
for maintenance and fire flow and deducting the
2 ,165 ,000 gpd (peak demand) of present , under
construction and approved usage, leaves an estimated
400 ,000 gallons/day available for future requirements .
There is also a degree of quality problems (nitrates
and chlorides) in certain wells . (The preceding data
was provided by the Village of Greenport . )
Specific reference is also made to the North Fork Water
Supply Plan , Suffolk County, New York , dated April
1983 . (Page 1 . 3 of this document is contained herein . )
Ground water supply conditions in Zone 4 , Greenport-
Southold are critical , but there is some extra supply
available (0 . 9 m. g . d . available vs . 0 . 63 m.g . d .
required by year 2000 as depicted in Table 1-1 . ) For
identification purposes , Zones 1 through 5 are depicted
in 4-1 from subject report , contained herein . Table 8-
27 of this report makes a comparison of alternatives
for the Greenport-Southold demand center . The
46
recommended alternative is Level III , which is a
municipal type distribution system. Implementation of
the Level III is recommended , with the report stating :
" . . . . adequate supply exists in Zones 3 and 4 to meet
Greenport ' s needs. "
The Village of Greenport Water Department regulations
were recently amended to provide preferential
considerations for water hook-up outside of the
Incorporated Village to major sub-divisions which are
categorized as "Self Sustained" , and which are defined
as "any sub-division, development , or facility which
provides water equal to or in excess of projected
demand" . (See Appendix No . 11 . )
As later discussed , this project site meets this
requirement . Also , for projects outside the Village ,
an up-front key money charge is levied in the amount of
two thousand five hundred seventy dollars ($2 , 570 . 00 ) .
Hook up fees are over and above the "up-front" monies .
47
In order to estimate the total quantity of groundwater that may be
withdrawn from larger capacity public supply wells frau each water
supply zone. water budget areas were delineated.- Substantial amounts
of groundwater are available outside of the budget areas but. to
avoid saltwater intrusion, can only be withdrawn by small . domestic
capacity wells.
In zones 1 and 2. the budget arCds were defined as those locations
where the groundwater 1 evel is 5 feet or more above sea 1 evel . In
zones 3. 4 and 5, the aveildbility of groundwater is more limited, so
the budget area boundary was defined as the 2- foot groundwater con-
tour. A total of approximately 41 .2 mgd of fresh groundwater is
available frau the budget areas. An additional 10 to 20 mgd is
available for danasti c wells uutsi de the budget areas. The results
o f the water budget diidl y%i•. , by Lune. are shown below in Table 1-1.
which also inclines culisuillpLIVC use prujectiuns for the year 2000.
Conclusion. SufficiL,it fr•k•tih gruunulwdter is available to satisfy the
needs of t'he overall plinninti Bred. However. critical water supply
conditions exist in Lone i (Ur i efit) where projected requirenents are
approximately equal to dvdil ,,bic supply. Groundwater supply condi-
tions in Zone 4 (Greenpur t/�uuthol d) dre also critical although there
is some extra dvai 1 abl a supply (U.9 mgd avail dbl a versus 0.63 mgd re-
quired) .
TAULE 1-1
WA TCR ISUULc 1�) ANU C1JN:,UI4Pi 1 VL UNE PROJECTIONS
Permissive bullies tIC Agricultural
Wdter SUStijiled Yitld, Consumptive Use. Consumptive Use,
Supply Budget Area Year 2000 Year 2000
Zone----- (1119a) - - --- - -- ------ (iiigd) — (mgd)
1 29.4 2.25 3.06
2 v 0.91 3.06
3 4.9 1 . 18 2.80
4 0.9 U.59 0.04
5 0.4 U.11 0.35
TOTALS 41 .2 ti.lU 9.31
48
aTw.� F� K��r :i -1 •�.
ZONE t
2
2
- - - • - ONE 3 ZONE 4 20Nt o
RMf R HEAD
150. O%N LINE �p'LO��.�' 0 THOLO
;2S `��QQ` OUNOARY
00
75 01 0 C E L L x: -P 0 A
50 c7
��0 �, 00 0h� .j`Lh h�� ,h `�0� ���'ti��p`h �j��9p
25 •■■■■■■■.f. MATER TABLE g "MATTITUC �'HASHAMOMU OAM
•..f. `� QQ
fffftfafRf■tttff■ fff■�■■.. CRPOND
EE WATER TABLE � Cr�J
SEA LEVEL O
off■■■■■• Rootlf■■■
tfffff■fff■fff■ foto■toot!■ tt f
-25
50--
7 5T
0 75T
CLAY ANC SANDY A \
100 � CLAY
125 \ \ �CL Y ANO
SANDY Y A 09S�c
S �D CLAY Y� R V
� �
QPER �, TEST �
175-v Gp1`r `
200
I VPpER GLACIAL
225
250-- AGOj HY
275 •
300
325--
350--
375--
400-
25350375400 FRESH WATER TO BEDROCK
425 -
1
FIGURE 4-1
GEOLOGIC CROSS - SECTIGN
arm—
TABLE b-2)
W471ARISON Of ALTERNATIVES
GA.EENDDRI/SOUTMOLD DEMAND CENTER
Evaluation
Criteria
Alternetl.e Cost Rellabtllt Environmental
Im lementibilit Considerations Adaptability
Level 1 level 1 costs for Great Individual systems .r.)uld the individual systers Individual wells are The eomritrent of funds to
InG�r10ua1 No9s Neck slid East Merton be reliable if they were provided with treatr•ent well-suited for these purchase Individual treat-
SysterS were significantly lower included in a No^c Treat- could be included in the areas.
than level 111 and v. sent Unit District. sent units sight preclude
town wide Yater Manager,fnt the provision of publsC
provsr. supplies In these areas.
Level 111 - Cost of Level III fc, Treatmer.; w',11 pt Veli- Be:aused required fail. Adequate supply exists Trestwent facility wclla
Subae-+ar: Greenport was ccr;arable able because Of tr.e high ties are within Green. in 20 nes 1 and 4 to sect have to be eonstru;tea
Center to Level v, level 111 was level of cor,peten;e de-- •
Systm s unaffordable for other onstrated D the Green. the im franchise area, Greenport s needs. initially; transmission;
y the iced. ntability is distribution Lan be
subder•,e^d centers, port syster. personnel , ennenced.
phased.
Level v - Regional systems were not The quality of the ground- Riverhead would have to withdrawals fror. zone 1 Most required facilities
Regional affordable for East Marion water beneath the clay in consent to the withers0 could exceed permissive cannot be phased. Major
Systems and great hog neck. levet v eastern riverhead cannot of water from. zone 2. con- sustained yield. many transmission line. stor-
wa
for only
Gcostcrtempoorpetiteme bequafuturerantecd in the struction of the trans-is- major stream crossings age and source of supply
if a Clean source of water Ston lines would be diffi• would be required. in Riverhead) wit be
could be found (beneath the cult to implement because Depending on the route constructed immediately.
clay) in eastern Riverhead. of its expense and because selected. sajor secon-
it crosses several politi- dary impacts can be
cal boundaries. anticipated along
route of transmission
lines. .•
H . Sewage Treatment . As noted in Section 3. 22 , the Village
of Greenport operates a sewage treatment plant on
Moore's Lane near the western edge of the Village and
within a few hundred feet of the subject parcel . The
treatment plant is a modern secondary treatment
facility, handling primarily domestic waste with little
or no industrial waste treated . The effluent from the
treatment plant is chlorinated and discharged into Long
Island Sound to the north of the treatment facility.
The treatment plant serves 869 customers within the
Village and 45 outside its incorporated boundaries ,
according to data provided from the Village
Superintendent of Utilities . Average daily wastewater
flow is approximately 400 ,000 gallons , or 80$ of the
plant 's 500 ,000 gpd capacity . This average daily flow
represents a thirty percent (30%) increase within the
last year primarily because of increased commercial
flow, including the influent from the newly constructed
scavenger waste treatment plant . Plans are expected to
be initiated shortly for doubling the plants capacity.
Similar to the Water Policy , Greenport levies an "up-
front" key money charge of two thousand seven hundred
dollars ($2 , 700 . 00) per unit , the collection of which is
to be used towards upgrading and increasing the sewer
plant ' s capacity .
50
I . Municipal Electric. The Village' s public-owned electric
utility services approximately 1 ,700 accounts , with a
service population of approximately 3 ,500 persons within
and adjacent to the Village of Greenport . Electricity
is currently purchased from the Power Authority of the
State of New York (PASNY) which currently results in
rates to users approximately 45 percent lower than those
serve by LILCO.
The Village electric utility may serve areas, such as
the subject parcel , located outisde the Village limits
which are within the Greenport Electric Franchise (PSC
ruling - April 26 , 1977) . However , the Village Board
has indicated that they do not wish to supply municipal
electricity to either project . Consequently , Long
Island Lighting Company has agreed to supply electric
utility services to both projects .
51
J . Sanitary Landfill . The Town of Southold operates a
landfill site on a 32 acre parcel north of Route 48 and
west of Cox Lane. This site has been used since the
1930 ' s , with approximately 5 years of useful life
remaining. The Town has acquired a 19 acre contiguous
tract for landfill expansion , and is currently working
with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation on
specific landfill design and the conditions of a Part
360 permit .
The Town is also initiating planning action to comply
with the Long Island Landfill Act which prohibibs and/or
limits the operation of landfills in Suffolk and Nassau
Counties by the year 1990 .
K . Other Utility Services . A LILCO gas main runs along
County Road 48 adjacent to the north side of the subject
property . LILCO has , and they continue to have , a
policy of permitting no new hook-ups , and the likelihood
of gas being available at this site has been indicated
highly unlikely . Other services adjacent to the
development include the New York Telephone and Dimension
Cable services .
52
4 . 2 . 4 - DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS
According to the United States Bureau of the Census , the
Town of Southold experienced growth of 2 , 368 persons , or
14 . 1 percent , during the 1970-1980 decade . Areas of the
Town nearest the subject project , however , experienced
actual population declines during this same period .
Specifically , the Village of Greenport experienced an 8 . 4
percent decline in population during the 1970 ' s , while the
surrounding "Census Designated Place" , which emcompasses the '
subject parcel , lost 5 . 7 percent of its population during
this same period .
This loss of permanent population in the Village of
Greenport and the surrounding "Census Designated Place" by
the same name coincides with the declining pattern of school
enrollment within District No . 10 discussed earlier .
More complete population count data for the Town of Southold
is presented below:
53
1970 1980
INCORPORATED VILLAGE Census Census
Village of Greenport 2 ,461 2 ,273
CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES
Cutchogue - New Suffolk 2 ,718 2 ,788
East Marion 531 648
Fishers Island 462 318
Greenport (unincorporated area) 1 ,682 1 , 587
Laurel 596 962
Mattituck 3 ,069 3 , 923
Orient 709 847
Peconic 835 1 , 056
Southold 3 ,749 4 , 770
Total Census Designated Places 14 ,323 16 ,899
Total - Town of Southold 16 ,804 19 , 172
Among other factors , the loss of population within the
Village can be attributed to a lack of available
opportunities for residential development within its
boundaries , other than scattered site infill development .
Accordingly, in its Master Plan and Proposed Zoning
Regulations , the Town of Southold has identified and begun
to respond to the need to encourage higher density
residential development , with a full complement of public
services , in and around the Village of Greenport and
adjacent to the several other hamlet centers within the
Township.
54
4 . 2 . 5 - CULTURAL RESOURCES
The visual resources of this particular project site include
the over one hundred acres of Moores Woods and Nature Study
area which is immediately to the West of the proposed
development across Moores Lane . The on-site visual
resources and natural areas include the established natural
ground cover and small trees and shrubs , particularly along
the peripheral of the project site . Maintenance of this
natural groundcover growth is planned as buffer areas around
both of the project sites . (See Site Plan No . SK-1 ,
Appendix No. 5 . )
55
SECTION V SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
The aspects of the environmental setting that may be
adversely impacted by the proposed action specifically
include transportation and water resources .
Developments of any kind , including residential development ,
cannot help but , and will generate increased vehicle trips .
The Institute for Transportation Engineering and Trip
Generating Data indicate that this project development would
generate average weekday one-way trips of eight hundred
forty (840) for the Cedarfields Affordable Housing , and four
hundred twenty-eight (428) weekday vehicle trips for the
town houses (Mooresland) .
It is only natural and understandable that a local and
adjacent residents who are used to , like , and enjoy the
combined low population density urban and rural area feel
that any increase in vehicle traffic is an adverse impact ,
even though the traffic study has indicated that the
surrounding streets and roads have adequate capacity for
the projected increased vehicle trips .
56
The second aspect of the environmental setting may be
adversely impacted by the project development would be its
water resources. The potential adverse impact to these
resources would be in the nature of lawn fertilizer and
introduction of any other contaminates into the recharged
groundwater . It is planned to• avoid any adverse impact by
having strict covenents on the use of lawn and garden
fertilizers , and having the design of the units to allow no
buried oil fuel tanks. With the adoption of these two (2)
measures , it is anticipated that the potential contamination
of recharged groundwater can be almost completely avoided
or eliminated.
57
SECTION VI MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT (CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING)
6 . 1 - NATURAL RESOURCES
The natural resources items addressed and for which
mitigation measures are to be accomplished; include geology ,
water resources , air resources , and terrestrial and equatic
ecology .
6. 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY:
All topsoil material is to be stockpiled during the
construction and used for the restoration and landscaping
around the new housing units . In addition , every reasonable
effort will be made to preserve in place the natural growth
in the designated buffer areas . The development plan also
calls for additional plantings in these areas to strengthen
and improve the growth of trees and shrubs in the buffer
areas .
58
6. 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES
Since the proposed development of the Cedarfields Affordable
Housing site would of necessity use the public water supply ,
no substantial impact of either ground water or geological
ground water resources are anticipated as a result of this
proposed development .
A sound estimate of water usage in the year round
residential development is one hundred (100) gallons per
capita per day. Based upon a persons per dwelling ratio of
3 . 3 within the family type residential units proposed , a
year round water use of three hundred thirty (330) gallons
per dwelling unit per day is reasonable , or for a total of
eighty-four (84) units of twenty-seven thousand seven
hundred twenty (27 ,720) gallons per day . This usage
represents approximately twenty-three percent (23%) of the
estimated production capability of one hundred twenty
thousand (120 ,000) gallons per day of the new well site that
is included within this parcel .
As the production source from this well is from rainfall
induced recharged groundwater , it is of utmost importance
that an adequate system of protection be provided for the
treatment of storm water prior to recharge into the
groundwater aquifer .
59
Mitigation measures are included , or are to be included in
the project development to provide this , and include the
following :
1 . A site construction restriction that allows no in-
ground oil fuel storage tanks . This action has been
supported and publicly agreed to both by the Village of
Greenport Board of Trustees and the Southold Town
Planning Board .
2. Historically it has been proven that the indiscriminate
application of lawn fertilizers can , and will , result
in the contamination of groundwater , particularly by
increased nitrogen levels . It is therefore important
that mitigation measures in the form of restrictions to
limit the application of such lawn fertilizers in
accordance with practices that will insure the use of
these nutrients by plant growth and not allow them to
be applied to the extent that they will percolate into
the groundwater recharge zone . Covenants and
restrictions have been prepared that each owner and
occupant of the housing units will be required to sign
and comply with . In addition to this , continual
monitoring of the nitrate levels of the new well site
will be performed by the Village of Greenport Utilities
Department .
60
3 . To preclude any potential contamination of the
groundwater recharge zone from road and street run-off ,
the storm drain design has incorporated into it
continuous sand recharge swales on either side of all
streets . This design will provide an increased ability
to filter and distribute , and as a result enhance the
quality of the groundwater percolating into the
recharge zone , as compared to a major storm drain
collection system with point recharge .
Parallel concerns with similar recommendations are contained
a letter from Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Chief Engineer . (See Appendix No . 12 . )
6 . 1 . 3 - AIR RESOURCES
No significant impact on air resources will occur as a
result of the proposed development , and therefore no
significant mitigation measures are deemed necessary .
During construction , however , the contractor will be
required to use adequate dust control measures , such as
sprinkling , to prevent transfer of dust to adjacent
residential areas .
61
6 . 1 . 4 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
While the maximum potential development of eighty-four (84)
dwelling units will cause the removal of existing vegetation
in areas where roadways and utilities are to be installed
and homes located , and , as a consequence , local wildlife
will be temporarily disrupted , this will impose no threat to
any endangered species of animal , plant or birdlife . The
flora and fauna present on the subject parcel is typical of
residential areas and their immediate periphery . It is
expected that similar populations will be returned , by man
and nature , to the development parcel as it matures as a
residential community. A significant mitigation measure to
the terrestrial ecology of the site will be the preservation
and addition of extensive buffer areas between the
Affordable Housing Site and the Town House Site , as well as
along County Road 48 and Moores Lane .
62
6 . 2 HUMAN RESOURCES
6. 2 . 1 TRANSPORTATION
The proposed project will not create significant adverse
impact on traffic conditions within and along the major
routes serving the Greenport area , specifically State Route
25 , County Road 48 , and the Moore's Lane connector roadway
(truck by-pass route) between NYS 25 and County 48 . As
discussed in Section 4 . 2 . 1 , Route 25 and County Road 48 have
residual capacities of 3 , 000 to 4 ,000 AADT and can readily
accommodate the additional traffic flow (estimated average
of 840 vehicle trips per day) based upon standards developed
by the Institute for Transportation Engineering (see
Appendix No . 13) that would be generated by 84 new units .
Several project-specific design considerations were given
attention during the engineering phases of this project
so that potential impacts related to transportation can be
mitigated in the following areas ! (1 ) a restriction on the
number of access points along Moore ' s Lane to ensure
efficient continuing use of this roadway as a connector
highway , including its function as a truck bypass of
downtown Greenport ; and (2) elimination of all access points
63
along County Road 48 ; and (3) the effective reduction
through road layout/project orientation of the amount of
additional traffic that would occur on residential streets ,
such as Washington Avenue , Bennett Road , and Middleton Road
to the east of the subject parcel .
6 . 2 . 2 - LAND USE
The development of the subject parcel for residential use
would generally be consistent with the residential character
of properties to the north and east in regard to density
The proposed density of 4 dwelling units per gross acre will
permit the installation of suitable residential
infrastructure -- municipal water , municipal sewer , and
properly-developed local streets -- that will provide a
well-planned and serviced residential environment .
As discussed in Section 6 . 1 . 4 , natural buffer areas will be
maintained and enhanced through additional planting and
removal of dead or diseased vegetation along existing
residences on Middleton Road . In the interest of both the
proposed development and the adjacent McCann Trailer Park , a
landscaped screen will be developed along the southern
boundary of the parcel .
64
As previously discussed , the proposed development would
also be totally consistent with the Town ' s current
Affordable Housing District (AHD) zoning of this parcel .
6 . 2 . 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
The maximum potential development of the subject parcel for
84 dwelling units would generate significant increased tax
revenues for the Greenport Union Free School District No.
10 , the Town of Southold , and Suffolk County . The
development will not have a significant adverse impact on
public facilities . Final type agreements regarding the
provision of water supply , sewage disposal and electric
service to accommodate the intended development remain to be
completed and negotiated with the Village of Greenport and
LILCO.
A. FIRE PROTECTION. The proposed development of
eighty-four (84) residential units will have no adverse
impact on the ability of the local fire department to
continue to serve and protect the entire Greenport East-
West Fire Protection District . The dwellings to be
constructed must be designed and constructed to meet or
exceed all applicable building codes designed for fire
safety . In the event of a fire incident , municipal
water service will be available within the residential
65
development . As previously discussed , the Greenport
Fire District maintains two fire stations -- Third
Street and Flint Street -- that are well-located to
provide effective coverage and suitable equipment
throughout the Village of Greenport and the surrounding
East-West Fire Protection District in the Town-outside-
Village area .
B. UTILITIES. The primary mitigation measure to minimize
the environmental impact in regard to utility
installation will be the requirement to have all utility
service installed underground . In addition to the
normally constructed underground water and sewer
facilities , electrical primary distribution , secondary
service to houses , along with all telephone and cable
TV , will be installed underground .
Because of the nature and concern of water usage and the
availability of water supplies , the residential unit
designed will have incorporated into it water saving
fixtures wherever applicable or practical .
66
All residential construction will have incorporated into
its design all applicable requirements of the new New
York State Energy Conservation Construction Code ,
effective April 1 , 1987 . This revised Code with its
increased R factors and other energy conservation
requirements will provide a significant reduction to the
energy usage of the proposed residential construction .
The increased water demand from the development of 84
dwelling units on the subject parcel will , under a worst
case scenario , will require an approximate 3 . 0 percent
increase in gallons per year supplied by the Greenport
Water Department . With this increase in pumpage total
consumption will , however , remain well below the
permissive yield in the company service area , especially
with the added production provided by the site ' s new
well . The new well has had test pumping accomplished ,
and water tests taken . The test well data , including
water tests , prepared both by EcoTest Laboratories , Inc .
and the Suffolk County Department of Health , are enclosed
as Appendix No . 14 . The test well was installed to a
depth of fifty-seven (57) feet . The static water level
measured to be eleven ( 11 ) feet from surface . The well
was pumped at a rate of two hundred and fifty (250)
gallons per minute for a period of six (6) hours on May
9 , 1985 , before having the water test taken . The test
67
results were excellent , with a chloride of 12 mg/L , and
a pH of 6 . 4 , nitrates of less than 0 . 5 mg/L , and no
evidence of organic chemicals . The well , on April 17 ,
1986 , was pumped for twenty-four (24) and forty-eight
( 48) hours respectively , with equally good test results .
(See Appendix No . 14 . ) The test well location was
selected by Peconic Associates , based on previously
developed geological and groundwater data , plus an on-
site analysis that a well in this location could very
possibly be used to take advantage of the ground
filtered recharge water collected in Silver Lake . It
has been determined that the water requirements of the
proposed development can be supplied by the Village of
Greenport without adversely impacting existing customers
or preventing service to other developments within the
franchise area for which service has been committed .
As further clarification of the Village of Greenport ' s
capability to provide water and sewer services for sub-
development , on June 18 , 1986 , the Village of Greenport
Board of Trustees authorized the Village Attorney to
prepare water and sewer agreements for this both of
these proposed projects . (See Appendix No . 14 . )
68
C. SEWAGE TREATMENT. Suffolk County Department of Health
Services have , as a required design flow, 300 gallons per day
for a single family residence. For eighty-four (84) units
this calculates to 25 ,200 gallons per day average flow.
The Greenport Wastewater Treatment Plant experiences an
average daily wastewater flow of approximately 400 , 000
gpd, approximately 80% of its 500 ,000 capacity. The
present average daily waste flow of 400 ,000 gallons per
day represents a thirty percent (30$) increase over last
years, primarily from commerical sources including the
Town of Southold's new scavenger waste plant . This
significant and sudden increase in wastewater flow has
prompted concern on the part of the Village of Greenport
as to its ability to handle new customers.
Greenport Utility Department has determined that the
projected daily use of 20 ,200 gallons per day for this
project can be accommodated , but is making immediate
plans to increase the capacity of its present treatment
plant to approximately double its present 500 ,000
gallons per day capacity . It is also projected by the
Village of Greenport Utility Department that the
increased plant capacity will be available prior to the
completion of the construction of the housing units
projected in this development .
69
The parcel proposed for development is proximate to the
sewage treatment facility, providing for easy physical
access to the treatment facility. No substantial impact
on sewage will be caused by the proposed development ,
except to significantly reduce the remaining residual
capacity of the plant and make the Village plans for
plant expansion one that needs to be expeditiously moved
forward. There is presently a dual pump lift station
located adjacent to the southwest boundary of the
subject parcel . The Village Utilities Superintendent
has reported that each lift pump is rated at 150 gpm
and , therefore, station capacity would be adequate for
the above calculated sewage loads . Pumping station
redesign, however , is expected to be required so as to
lower the stations operable invert elevation.
70
6. 2. 4 - CULTURAL RESOURCES
A: VISUAL RESOURCES. The architectural design of the
housing units took into specific consideration the
nature and type of the local architecture, and it is the
intent of the new housing units to physically blend with
the existing surroundings, including the adjacent
residential areas. Specific reference is made to the
typical housing unit elevation contained in Appendix
J
No. 6.
To minimize visual impact to the project development ,
there is no planned street lighting and the signs will
be restricted to one (1) located at the entrance to
Cedarfields , where the main street joins Moores Lane .
The landscaping, as depicted on SK-1 , will compliment
the buffer areas and act as a separation between
surrounding land uses and existing streets and highway.
71
6. 2. 5 NOISE
The only unusual noise is expected to occur during the
construction operation, and the impact of this noise will be
mitigated by only scheduling the construction during normal
business hours and minimizing noise impact during the more
sensitive times of early morning and late afternoon. Also,
every attempt will be made to limit any disruption to the
natural buffer areas during the period of construction.
_-. _ 7,2
SECTION VII MITIC TION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMpL%CT (MOORESL ANO TOWN HOUSES)
7. 1 - NATURAL RESOURCES
The natural resources items addressed and for which
mitigation measures are to be accomplished , include geology ,
water resources , air resources, and terrestrial and equatic
ecology.
s
7. 1 . 1 - GEOLOGY:
All topsoil material is to be stockpiled during the
construction and used for the restoration and landscaping
around the new housing units. In addition , every reasonable
effort will be made to preserve in place the natural growth
in the designated buffer areas . The development plan also
calls for additional plantings in these areas to strengthen
and improve the growth of trees and shrubs in the buffer
areas.
73
7. 1 . 2 - WATER RESOURCES
Since the proposed development of the Mooresland Town Houses
site would of necessity use the public water supply,
no substantial impact of either ground water or geological
ground water resources are anticipated as a result of this
proposed development.
A sound estimate of water usage in the year round
Town House development is one hundred (100) gallons per
capita per day. Based upon a persons per dwelling ratio of
3. 3 within the family type residential units proposed, a
year round water use of three hundred thirty (330) gallons
per dwelling unit per day is reasonable, or for a total of
eighty-four (84) units of twenty-seven thousand seven
hundred twenty (27,720) gallons per day. This usage
represents approximately twenty-three percent (23%) of the
estimated production capability of one hundred twenty
thousand (120 ,000) gallons per day of the new well site that
is included within this parcel .
As the production source from this well is from rainfall
induced recharged groundwater , it is of utmost importance
that an adequate system of protection be provided for the
treatment of storm water prior to recharge into the
groundwater aquifer.
74
Mitigation measures are included, or are to be included in
the project development to provide this, and include the
following:
1 . A site construction restriction that allows no in-
ground oil fuel storage tanks . This action has been
supported and publicly agreed to both by the Village of
Greenport Board of Trustees and the Southold Town
Planning Board.
2. Historically it has been proven that the indiscriminate
application of lawn fertilizers can, and will , result
in the contamination of groundwater , particularly by
increased nitrogen levels. Covenant restrictions are
being prepared to be incorporated part of the
management arrangement of the town house development
site to limit the application of lawn fertilizers and
other chemicals to insure that neither the nutrients
nor harmful chemicals will be applied to the extent
that they would percolate into the groundwater reccarge
zone. It has been additionally suggested that a small
two (2) inch test well be placed in the bottom of each
of the three (3) recharge basins , and that once each
year a water sample be taken from these small test
wells and submitted for analysis to act as an early
75 .
indication of any potential increase in groundwater
nutrients or other chemicals. In addition to the
above, continual monitoring of nitrate levels at the
new well site will be performed by the Village of
Greenport Utilities Department .
Parallel concerns with similar recommendations are contained
a letter from Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Chief Engineer . (See Appendix.lo. 12 . )
7. 1 . 3 AIR RESOURCES
No significant impact on air resources will occur as a
result of the proposed development, and therefore no
significant mitigation measures are deemed necessary.
During construction , however , the contractor will be
required to use adequate dust control measures, such as
sprinkling, to prevent transfer of dust to adjacent
residential areas .
76
7. 1 . 4 - TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
It is recognized that the construction of roadways and town
houses will require the removal of existing vegetation , and
as a consequence local wildlife will be temporarily
disrupted, but this will pose no threat to any endangered
species of any animal , plant , or bird life. The grouping of
the town house units allows for preservation of a large
amount of existing vegetation type growth. The developer
plans to limit, as much as practical , any destruction to
this growth so as to enhance and preserve the natural beauty
of the site, as well as its local wildlife. The flora and
fauna present on subject parcel is typical of residential
areas and their immediate periphery. It is expected that
similar populations will be returned, by man or nature, to
the development parcel as it matures as a residential
community. A significant mitigation measure to the
terrestrial ecology of the site will be the preservation and
addition of extensive buffer areas between the Affordable
Housing Site and the Town House Site, as well as along
County Road 48 and Moores Lane .
77
7.2 HUMAN RESOURCES
7. 2 . 1 TRANSPORTATION
The proposed project will not create significant adverse
impact on traffic conditions within and along the major
routes serving the Greenport area, specifically State Route
25 , County Road 48 , and the Moore's Lane connector roadway
(truck by-pass route) between NYS 25 and County 48 . As
discussed in Section 4.2. 1 , Route 25 and County Road 48 have
residual capacities of 3,000 to 4 ,000 AADT and can readily
accommodate the additional traffic flow (estimated average
of 428 vehicle trips per day for 84 new town house units)
based upon standards developed by the Institute for
Transportation Engineering (see Appendix No. 13) that would
be generated by 84 new residential , apartment , or
condominimum units.
Several project-specific design considerations were given
attention during the engineering phases of this project
so that potential impacts related to transportation can be
mitigated in the following areas: (1) a restriction on the
number of access points along Moore's Lane to ensure
efficient continuing use of this roadway as a connector
highway , including its function as a truck bypass of
downtown Greenport ; and (2) elimination of all access points
78
along County Road 48; and (3) the effective reduction
through road layout/project orientation of the amount of
additional traffic that would occur on residential streets.
7.2.2 LAND USE
The development of this parcel for town house residential
use would not be in conflict with the residential character
of properties to the north and east in regard to density.
The layout of the proposed development will permit the
installation of suitable residential infrastructure --
municipal water , municipal sewer , and properly-developed
local streets -- that will provide a well-planned and
serviced town house residential type environment . As
discussed in Section 7. 1 . 4 , natural buffer areas will be
maintained and enhanced through additional planting ,
especially along Moores Land and County Road 48 .
As previously discussed, the proposed town house development
would be totally consistent with the Town' s current "M"
(Light Multiple Residence) .
79
7.2. 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES
The development of the subject parcel with eighty-four (84)
town house type units would generate significant increased
tax revenues for the Greenport Union Free School District
No. 10 , the Town of Southold, and Suffolk County. The
development will not have a significant adverse impact on
public facilities. Final type agreements regarding the
provision of water supply, sewage disposal and electric
service to accommodate the intended development remain to be
completed and negotiated with the Village of Greenport and
LILCO.
A. FIRE PROTECTION. The proposed development of
eighty-four (84) town house units will have no adverse
impact on the ability of the local fire department to
continue to serve and protect the entire Greenport East-
West Fire Protection District. The town house units to
be constructed must be designed and constructed to meet
or exceed all applicable building codes designed for
fire safety . In the event of a fire incident , municipal
water service will be available within the residential
development . As previously discussed , the Greenport
Fire District maintains two fire stations -- Third
80
Street and Flint Street -- that are well-located to
provide effective coverage and suitable equipment
throughout the Village of Greenport and the surrounding
East-West Fire Protection District in the Town-outside-
Village area.
B. UTILITIES. The primary mitigation measure to minimize
the environmental impact in regard to utility
installation will the requirement to have all utility
s
service installed underground. In addition to the
normally constructed underground water and sewer
facilities, electrical primary distribution, secondary
service to houses, along with all telephone and cable
TV, will be installed underground.
Because of the nature and concern of water usage and the
availability of water supplies, the town house unit
designed will have incorporated into it water saving
fixtures wherever applicable or practical .
91
All town house type construction will have incorporated
into its design all applicable requirements of the new
New York State Energy Conservation Construction Code ,
effective April 1 , 1987. This revised Code with its
increased R factors and other energy conservation
requirements will provide a significant reduction to the
energy usage of the proposed residential construction.
Reference is made to Section 6.2. 3 (B) - Utilities in
regard to water for the projected town house
development. This site, like the Affordable Housing
Development, will require an approximate three percent
(3$) increase in the gallons per year supplied by the
Greenport Water Department . The new well site is
expected to have a production capacity of twice that
required by both the Mooresland and the Cedarfields
developments .
C. SEWAGE TREATMENT. Suffolk County Department of Health
Services have, as a required design flow, 225 gallons
per day for a two bedroom apartment/condominimum, and
300 gallons per day for a three bedroom unit . For 42
units of each this calculates to 25 ,050 gallons per day
average flow.
82-..
The Greenport Wastewater Treatment Plant experiences an
average daily wastewater flow of approximately 400 ,000
gpd, approximately 80$ of its 500,000 capacity. The
present average daily waste flow of 400 ,000 gallons per
day represents a thirty percent (30$) increase over last
years, primarily from commerical sources including the
Town of Southold's new scavenger waste plant. This
significant and sudden increase in wastewater flow has
prompted concern on the part of the Village of Greenport
as to its ability to handle new customers.
Greenport Utility Department has determined that the
projected daily use of 20 ,200 gallons per day for this
project can be accommodated, but is making immediate
plans to increase the capacity of its present treatment
plant to approximately double its present 500 ,000
gallons per day capacity. It is also projected by the
Village of Greenport Utility Department that the
increased plant capacity will be available prior to the
completion of the construction of the hoursing units
projected in this development .
83 x
The parcel proposed for development is proximate to the
sewage treatment facility, providing for easy physical
access to the treatment facility. No substantial impact
on sewage will be caused by the proposed development ,
except to significantly reduce the remaining residual
capacity of the plant and make the Villages plans for
plant expansion one that needs to be expeditiously moved
forward. There is presently a dual pump lift station
located adjacent to the southwest boundary of the
subject parcel . The Village Utilities Superintendent
has reported that each lift pump is rated at 158 gpm
and, therefore , station capacity would be adequate for
the above calculated sewage loads. Pumping station
redesign, however , is expected to be required so as to
lower the stations operable invert elevation .
64 `
7 . 2. 4 CULTURAL RESOURCES
A: VISUAL RESOURCES. The architectural design of the
town houses took into specific consideration the natural
characteristics of the area so as to physically blend
with its existing surroundings, including the adjacent
residential areas. Specific reference is made to the
typical town house unit elevation contained in Appendix
No . 8 .
f
To minimize visual impact to the project development ,
a small , relaively inconspicuous sign is expected to be
located only at the entrance to the Mooresland
development where the entrance joins Moores Lane.
The landscaping and buffer area are depicted on SK-1 ,
especially that portion along Moores Lane , will act as a
visual separation between the development and the
existing streets and highway .
85
7 . 2. 5 NOISE
The only unusual noise is expected to occur during the
construction operation, and the impact of this noise will be
mitigated by only scheduling the construction during normal
business hours and minimizing noise impact during the more
sensitive times of early morning and late afternoon. Also ,
every attempt will be made to limit any disruption to the
natural buffer areas during the period of construction.
86
SECTION VIII - ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE
AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED
CEDARF.IELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
MOORESLANO TOWN HOUSES
Based on a comprehensive review of Sections VI and VII , the
only adverse environmental effect that will occur regardless
of mitigation measures, would be the increased vehicle
trips. Based on the standards developed by the Institute of
Transportation Engineering (see Appendix No. 13) , the total
new vehicle trips for both projects is estimated at twelve
hundred sixty-eight (1268) . While this total will be
considerably less than the residual capacities of both Route
24 and County Road 48 , it is an impact that cannot be
totally mitigated.
As previously discussed and stated, the layout of the
development to limit access to Moores Lane, and to have no
access on County Road 48 , is planned to reduce impact of
through traffic on both of these roads. In the Affordable
Housing area, the street layout provides three (3) means of
access with the majority of the vehicle movement anticipated
to be on Moores Lane, and a much smaller number on the
Washingto Avenue and Bennett Road extensions .
87
SECTION IX - ALTERNATIVES
CEpARPIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING
9. 8 - ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES
9. 8. 1 - SITE LAYOUT
The present affordable site layout (see Appendix No . 5) is
one that has had fairly extensive review with the Southold
Town Planning Board, the result of which , the Southold Town
Planning Board issued sketch plan approval (see Appendix No .
17) on April 2 , 1987. Based on the past review and this
decision, it is felt that the alternative site layouts have
already been considered, and that no further review of the
basic layout is required.
9 . 8 . 2 - ORIENTATION
So as to prevent a degree of sameness , and to promote
individual characterization of the individual residences ,
the developer plans to position and locate individual houses
on their respective lots with varying degrees of differences
in position and set-back requirements .
88
9. 1 - ALTERNATIVE SITES
The discussion of alternative sites is not germaine to the
applicant's request for the development of an "AHD"
(Affordable Housing) District at the subject location . The
applicant has title to this 26. 2 acre tract , and plans to
develop this particular property in accordance with a
sensitive land planning approach, consistent with local ,
state and other applicable regulations, including site
zoning. This is the only site*qin the Town zoned "AHD" , and
at present the only development being planned to satisfy the
market demand for moderate income housing conveniently
located with respect to community services and facilities .
It was determined that six (6) other parcels ranging in size
from 37 . 6 acres to 56. 7 acres were potentially available
within the Town. Presently, they are all zoned "A"
(Residential and Agricultural) , one of which is to be zoned
R-48 in the Proposed Master Plan. Municipal water is , or
could be made, available to at least four (4) of the
parcels. Municipal sewer is not available to any of the six
(6) parcels . In essence , none of the other six (6) parcels
are as suited for the proposed residential density as the
Costello one on Moores Lane.
89
9.2 - ALTERNATIVE SIZE
There is no reasonable alternative to increasing or
decreasing the proposed development of this site for the
proposed used of affordable housing. Increasing the lot
size would increase the cost of such lots, and immediately
result in a price increase above the affordable housing
maximum cost as set by the Town of Southold.
t
Decreasing the lot size would ultimately result in increased
crowding, and would not be in accordance with the approved
density for this particular type of zoning, and would
require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals , neither
of which is considered a reasonable alternative to project
size.
It has already be established by the number of applicants
that wish to be considered for the residential units in this
Affordable Housing District , that there already exists a
market demand , and community needs in excess of what is
proposed.
90
9 . 3 - ALTERNATIVE LAND USE
The proposed site of the Affordable Housing Development is
suitable for a variety of uses to include the following!
o Agriculture
o Commerical or industrial facilities
o Other types of housing with varying degrees of density.
This site was formerly farmlans, and with clearing could be
returned to this use. An informal check of local residents
has indicated that this area has not been farmed for over
twenty-five (25) years. It has been previously established
that this site has on it a potentially productive well , and
based on the tests conducted, the water quality is one of
the best on the North Fork of Long Island . Returning this
to agricultural production, with the increased use of
fertilizer , etc . , has a potential of contaminating the
groundwater with nutrients such as nitrogen , possibly
rendering this well site unusable.
The use of the site for commerical or industrial activities
was considered prior to this , and met both local resistance
from the the surrounding residential areas, as well as not
being favorably received by the Town Planning Board.
Therefore, this is now not considered an alternative land use .
91
This site was previously zoned as "A" (Residential
Agriculture) with a two (2) acre density. but subsequently
rezoned to "M" (Light Multiple Residence) , and this portion
was later rezoned again to "AHD" (Affordable Housing
District) . The alternative of keeping this site in either
the "A" or the "M" zone has been thoroughly reviewed, been
the subject of public hearings, draft environmental impact
statements, and reviewed by both the Town Board and the Town
Planning Board. As a result , no further examination of land
use alternatives is considered necessary as part of this
D. E . I .S.
9. 4 - NO ACTION
The no action alternative examined in this instance would be
the Town Planning Board' s failure to approve this site for
affordable housing units . It is believed that such a
failure to approve the project would frustrate the efforts
of the owner , Mr . Costello , and the developers , Diane Carrol
and Donald Bracken , to undertake the development and
construction of these individual residences at a price that
will assist in helping fill the existing demand for moderate
income housing. The end result to this no action
alternative is expected to be a petition by the applicant to
again rezone the property back to either "M" or "A" , so that
it could continue to be a marketable entity.
92
This would mean that the plans for affordable housing would
be discontinued for this particular site. As previously
discussed there are no significant environmental impacts
pertaining to this proposed action , that would be avoided if
the Town Planning Board were to pursue the no action
alternative .
t
93
SECTION X - ALTERNATIVES - (MOORESLAND TOWN HOUSESI
10 . 0 - ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES
10. 0 . 1 - SITE LAYOUT
The present town house site layout is the result of a
comprehensive planning effort that included the development
of several alternative layouts, and the one depicted has
been selected as the best one that most closely relates to
the surrounding terrain and area.
10 . 0 . 2 - ORIENTATION
A comprehensive attempt was made during the planning effort
to locate each of the individual town house structures that
would take advantage of the existing terrain, as well as
being efficiently located as far as street access and
utility layout. Other orientation schemes were considered
in addition to the one presently shown on the Site Plan , and
after a comprehensive review and evaluation, the one
depicted was felt to be the most compatible and efficient
orientation of each of the structures . Additional
orientation schemes could be considered , of specifically
requested during the review of the Site Plan.
94
18. 1 - ALTERNATIVE SITES
The discussion of alternative sites is not considered
germaine with the applicant 's request for the construction
of a town house type development at the subject location.
The applicant has title of this portion of the 48. 718 Acre
tract , and wishes to develop it in accordance with a
sensitive land planning approach, consistent with local ,
State, and other applicable regulations, and satisfying the
0
demand for mid-cost range town house type development
conveniently located with respect to community services and
facilities.
18 . 2 - ALTERNATIVE SIZE
The alternative to size of this town house development would
be to either increase or decrease the number of units on
this particular parcel . There is no question that the
alternative of reducing the number of units would result in
more open space , reduced use of utilities, traffic, and so
forth . However , it would on the other hand increase the
purchase cost of these units and eliminate the overall
purpose of development , which is to provide a mid-cost range
town house type unit that would be attractive to middle
income families who would not qualify for the Affordable
Housing unit , and are not effluent to the point where they
95
can afford a two (2) to five (5) acre lot and the price of
construction of a house on same.
Increasing the number of units would be contrary to the
density required by its current zoning, and would also crowd
the site and make it a less attractive area, and would
definitely not be compatible with the surrounding
residential development .
f
The consideration of either alternative is not considered a
practical one.
18 . 3 - ALTERNATIVE LAND USE
The proposed site of the Affordable Housing Development is
suitable for a variety of uses to include the following:
o Agriculture
a Commerical or industrial facilities
o Other types of housing with varying degrees of density.
This site was formerly farmland , and with clearing could be
returned to this use. An informal check of local residents
has indicated that this area has not been farmed for over
twenty-five (25) years . It has been previously established
that this site has on it a potentially productive well , and
96
based on the tests conducted, the water quality is one of
the best on the North Fork of Long Island. Returning this
to agricultural production, with the increased use of
fertilizer , etc. , has a potential of contaminating the
groundwater with nutrients such as nitrogen , possibly
rendering this well site unusable.
The use of the site for commerical or industrial activities
was considered prior to this, and met both local resistance
0
from the the surrounding residential areas , as well as not
being favorably received by the Town Planning Board.
Therefore , this is now not considered an alternative land use .
This site was previously zoned as "A" (Residential
Agriculture) with a two (2) acre density, but subsequently
rezoned to "M" (Light Multiple Residence) . The sketch plan
phase of this entire site thoroughly reviewed with the
Planning Board , and the zoning has been the subject of
public hearings and Draft Environmental Impact Statements.
As a result , the present zoned "M" (Light Mutiple Residence)
is considered the only one for consideration , and therefore
no further examination of land use alternatives will be
considered necessary as part of this D. E. I .S.
97
18 . 4 - NO ACTION
The no action alternative examined in this instance would be
the Town Planning Board's failure to approve this site for
town house type development. It is believed that such a
failure to approve the project would frustrate the efforts
of the owner , Mr . Costello , and the developers, Diane Carrol
and Donald Bracken, to undertake the construction of these
town houses to meet the local demand of a mid-cost
l
residence , and it would further mean that the construction
of such units would be discontinued for this particular
site .
As previously discussed , there are no significant
environmental impact pertaining to this proposed action that
would be avoided is the Town Planning Board was to pursue
the no action alternative .
98
SECTION XI - IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF
RESOURCES - (CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING
UNITS AND MOORESLAND TOWN HOUSES
The proposed development of the parcel will irreversibly and
irretrievably commit the following resources to the intended
project : (1) a 48 . 718 acre tract of non-productive and
unused land will bear development; (2) money will be
committed for infrastructure installation and maintenance
i
and individual capital investments will be made in
residential premises; and (3) energy resources will be
committed to construction activity and to long-term uses for
heating , cooling and related functions.
As previously discussed in this DEIS, (1) the water provided
by the Village of Greenport will result in increased annual
pumpage , thus lessening the surplus available for other
development ; (2) existing vegetation on portions of the site
will be removed , though likely to be replaced with
comparable , or improved , native , non-endangered species ; (3)
loss of residual capacity will be experienced in existing
streets and highways ; (4) and the sewage service to be
provided the by Village of Greenport will result in
increased sewage flow, and thereby utilizing a major portion
of the very small remaining plant capacity available for other
development and , accordingly , emphasizing the need for capacity
improvements/expansion of the Village sewage treatment plant .
99
There is , however , no irreversible or irretrievable commitment of
resources identified that would suggest that the proposed project
be reexamined or that the proposed action should not occur .
The most significant irreversible or irretrievable commitment
would be the construction of town house type or moderate
income housing units that would negate the future
availability of the Mooresland portion of the property for
one-quarter acre lots for detached housing.
100
SECTION XII - GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS - (MOORESLAND TOWN
HOUSES)
12. 1 - POPULATION
This development of town houses is expected to result in a
population increase of two hundred (208) to two hundred
fifty (258) . Most often the concerns of a development that
results in increased population is because of the impact on
the local schools. In this parfticular case, increase in
school age population is a plus because of the steady
decline in the school population . Reference is made to
Appendis No. 16. Any increase in the school population
would result in a better ratio of expense per pupil than now
exists.
_ 101
RECTION XIII - EFFECTS ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
RESOURCES - (CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AND MOORESLAND TOWN HOUSES
13. 1 - PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES, CONSUMPTION. AND ALTERNATIVES
The proposed energy use fof both projects will be totally
electrical . The approximate heat energy for Cedarfields
Affordable Housing will be 6 ,471 k .w. per hour . The heat
f
energy load for the town houses was not yet available from
the Architect .
Both the Affordable Housing Units and the town house units
will use heat pumps for heating and cooling of their
respective type of unit .
It would have been highly desirable to have used gas as a
municipal heating source. Meetings were held with LILCO
engineers to explore this possibility, and after their
review of this specific project , we were notified that gas
would not be available for either the affordable units or
for the town houses.
102
Oil hot air heat was an alternative consideration for the
affordable housing units , but because the design includes
only a slab on grade , and buried fuel tanks are not
permitted, this is not a viable alternative for these units.
13. 2 - ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
Both the affordable housing units and the town houses will
be constructed in strict accordance with the new New York
State Energy Conservation Construction Code, effective April
1 , 1987 .
103
APPENDIX NO. 1
i
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
DECLARATION OF LEAD AGENCY AND
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
MARCH 12 , 1987
A - 1
S�FFoc�
P D
T LD
S � Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
March 12, 1987
Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin
PResident
Peconic Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944 r
Re: Costello Affordable Housing Project
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, March 9, 1987.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare
themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality
Review Act for the major subdivision of Costello for 84 lots
on 26. 4 acres in the affordable housing district located at
Greenport.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
,�d� 0A
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
��FFot,�c
p D
TLD
S 0 Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
March 9, 1987
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State
Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does
hereby dtermine that the action descriped below is Type I
and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment.
0
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Proposal is for a subdivision of 26. 4 acres into 84 residential
lots in the affordable housing district located at County
Route 48 and Moore' s Lane, Greenport to be referred to as
"Costello Affordable Housing Project" , tax map no 1000-40-5-p/ol.
Copies mailed to :
Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner
NYS DEC at Stony Brook
Sufoflk Cou ty Department of Health Services
Suffol unty Planning Commission
F cis J. Murphy, Supervisor
Merlon Wiggin, agent
p D
T LD
S Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
March 12, 1987
Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin
PResident
Peconic Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944 r
Re: Costello Affordable Housing Project
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, March 9, 1987.
WHEREAS, John Costello, has applied to the Southold Town
Planning Board for a subdivision for 84 lots on 26. 4 acres
in the affordable housing district located at County Route
48 and Moore' s Lane, Greenport,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED-AS FOLLOWS:
1. That pursuant to the provision of Article 8 of the
Environemntal conservation Law; Part 617 .of Title 6 of the
New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44
of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board,
as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed
is Type I and is likely to have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. That the Planning Board shall file and circulate
such determination as required by- the aforementioned law,
rules, and code.
3. That the Planning Bord immediately notify the applicant' s
agent, Merlon E. Wiggin, of this determination, and further
request said applicant' s agent to prepare a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement in accordance with the scope and contents
required by the Planning Board and Town Planner, all in accordance
with said -law, rules, and code.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Merlon Wiggin Page 2 3/12/87
------------------------------------------------------------
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
t
p D
T LD
S Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
April 2, 1987
Mr. Merlon Wiggin
President
Peconic Associates
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Site Plan for Mooresland
located at Greenport
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, March 30, 1987.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare
themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality
Review Act for the site plan for 84 townhouses located at
Moore' s Lane, Greenport to be known as "Mooresland" .
If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
DA15 -16 -, 41(-Jl�
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
SSTU(-c
D
4T LD
S
P
Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
April 2, 1987
Mr. Merlon Wiggin
President
Peconic Associates
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, NY 11944 a
Re: Mooresland at Greenport
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, March 30, 1987.
WHEREAS, John Costello, Diane Carroll and Donald Bracken
have applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for a site
plan for 84 townhouses on 22 acres located at County Route
48 and Moores' s Lane, Greenport,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That pursuatn tothe provision of ARticle 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the
New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44
of the Southold Twon Code; the Southold Town Planning Board
as lead agency, does heresy determine that the action proposed
is Type I and is likely to have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. That the Planning Board shall file and ciriculate
such determination as required by the aforementioned law,
rules, and code.
3. That the Planning Board immediately notify the applicant' s
agent, Merlon E. Wiggin, of this determination, and further
request said applicant' s agent to prepare a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement in accordance with the scope and contents
required by the Planning Board and Town Planner, all in accordance
with said law, rules, and code.
Mr. Wiggin Page 2 4/2/87
---------------------------------------------------------
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
amoj-
BENNETT OORLOWSKI, J . , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
r
5��F0�c
P & D
T LD
S y
Southold. N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
March 30, 1987
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the environmental
Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State
Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency does
hereby determine that the action described below is Type I
and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Proposal is for a site plan for 84 townhouses on 22 acres
located at Moore' s Lane and County Route 48, Greenport to
be referred to as "Mooresland" , tax map no. 1000-40-5-p/o 1.
Copies mailed to :
Henry Williams,DEC Commissiner
NY DEC at Stonybrook
S ffolk County Department of Health SErvices
S ffolk County Planning Commissin
rancis J. Murphy, Superivsor
erlon Wiggin, Agent
APPENDIX NO. 2
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RESOLUTION TO ADDRESS MATTER OF CONCERN
JUNE 7 , 1985
A - 2
li
_ a
;:•r.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
O
t- P.O. Box 728
Soutllold, New York 11971
1UDITII T TERRY TELEPHONE
TOWEL CLERK (516)765.1801
EGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK I
TOWN OF SOUiHOLD I
I
June 7, 1985 I
I
- I I
i
i
John A. Costello
206 Wiggins Lane
Greenport, New York 11944 t
Dear John:
Enclosed herewith is a "Notice of Significant Effect on the ?
Environment' in respect to your petition for annexation of approx-
imately 48.7 acres of land in the unincorporated porton of the
Town of Southold into the Incorporated Village of Greenport, I !
which determination was the subject of a Town Board resolution
on June 4, 1985, copy enclosed herewith. I ;
You are hereby requested to prepare a Final Environmental
Impact State, for submission by July 1, 1985, addressing those
matters of concern as outlined in the resolution, as well as those
issues raised at the Draft Environmental Impact Statement public I i
hearing held on May 16, 1985. i
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry I
Southold Town Clerk
cc: Peconic Associates, Inca/ I
William W. Esseks, Esq.
I
I
I
- I
�I
1
i
os�FFot,��oG
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road I
�- P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
JUDITH T.TERRY TELEPHONE
Town CLERK (516)765-1801
REGISTRAR o/VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Date: June 4, 1985
i
i
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations,
and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code.. the Southold Town Board, as lead
agency, upon receipt of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and public
hearing on same, does hereby determine that the action described below is a
Type 1 action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment and
has requested the filing of a Final Environmental Impact Statement.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION i
Petition of John A. Costello (formerly East End Associates) for the l
annexation of approximately 48.7 acres of land in the unincorporated portion
of the Town of Southold into the Incorporated Village of Greenport, said property
being located at the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of
North Road (CR 48) and the easterly side of Moores Lane, Greenport, New York.
Further information may be obtained by contacting Mrs. Judith T. Terry,
Southold Town Clerk, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
l
I
Copies to: Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook
Commissioner Williams, DEC, Albany
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Planning Board I
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Suffolk County Department of Planning j
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Village of Greenport
John A. Costello
William W. Esseks, Esq.
Howard E. Pachman, Esq.
Peconic Associates, Inca
1
,
cwt' •• ,;,
u''• ` ' 1''''` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
�• ""'���- P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971 i
r i
JUDITH T TERRY TELEPHONE
TOWN CLEKK (516)765-1801
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK I
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD I
AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 4, 1985:
WHEREAS, John A. Costello (fprmerly East End Associates) has heretofore filed
a petition with the Town Clerk for annexation of approximately 48.7 acres of land
in the unincorporated portion of the Town of Southold into the Incorporated Village
of Greenport, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and I
Chpater 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Town Board, as lead agency, determined
that the action proposed is a Type I action-`and is likely to have a significant effect
on the environment, and
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk did' file and circulate such determination as required by
the aforementioned law, rules and code, and
WHEREAS, John A. Costello did, upon request of the Town Board, cause to be
prepared and filed a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, all in accordance with
said law, rules and code, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Southold held a public'hearing on the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement submitted by John A. Costello at the Southold I
Town hall on May 16; 1985, at which time all interested persons were given an
opportunity to speak, now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold does hereby determine 1
that the action proposed is likely to have a significant effect on the environment,
and be it further
RESOLVED that the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, John A. Costello,
of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Final Environ-
mental Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code, by July 1, i
1985, and address the following matters of concern:
1. Address all of those issues raised at the Draft Environmental Impact State-
ment public hearing held on May 16, 1985, that were not sufficiently covered in the
DEIS. j
2. At the hearing on May 16, 1985 the economic issue was addressed by more
people than any other environmental issue. In order to properly evaluate the economic I
benefit vs. potential negative environmental impact, an analysis of the cost of housing
lots that would result from annexation is requested, as well as the strategy by which
these lots will be relayed to low and moderate income people in need of housing, as
opposed to investors seeking to benefit from lots priced below market value. i
3. Address DEIS claims made on page 44, F. Water Supply.. .."This increase
in pumpage will keep total consumption well below the permissive yield in the company f
service area. The water requirements of the proposed development can be supplied
by the company without impacting existing customers or preventing service to other i
developments within the franchise area for which service for has been agreed to." f
4. Yield of existing well. Affect of road runoff to that well. Will pumpage
pull runoff into it?
S. Alternatives: A special public improvement district (remaining in Southold
Town).
Page 2 - Resolution - Southold Town Board - 6/4/85
Re: Request for Final EIS - Costello Annexation Petition
6. Connection to sewer = consumptive use and ocean outfall. What will
be the groundwater impact?
7. Guarantee from Greenport Village that water and sewer will be provided
if annexation takes place.
8. Guarantee from John A. Costello that on-site well will be made available
to Greenport Village.
9. Submission of appraiser's report: Page 38. ..."A professional appraiser
has advised that the annexation and calculated development would not impact the
value of adjacent homes."
i
( i
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
APPENDIX NO. 3
f
CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "A" (RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL)
TO "M" (LIGHT MULTIPLE RESIDENCE)
DECEMBER 3, 1985
A - 3
THIS IS TO' CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS
ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR
MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 3, 1985:
WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the
Town of Southold by ...........John A. Costello
....................................................................
requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone
Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang-
"A" Residential .and "M' Ligr Multiple
ing from .........Agricultural_...._...._ District to .............Residence...........
District the property described in said petition, and
WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board for its
investigation, recommendation and repo and its report having been filed
with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said
petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ....29tkt........day
of .............October 9..85.., and due deliberation having been
had thereon
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said
petition be, and it hereby is GRANTED.
DATED: December 3, 1985
-A q4ATER
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
APPENDIX NO. 4
If
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RESOLUTION
CHANGING A PORTION OF THE SITE FROM
"M" (LIGHT MULTIPLE RESIDENCE) TO
"AHD" (AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT)
FEBRUARY 27 , 1987
A - 4
oS�FFot,��o
• Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
O� P.O. Box 1 179
Southold, New York 11971
.JUDITH T. TERRY 'rFLEPHONF
TOWN CLERK (516)765-1801
REGISTRAR OF VITAL.STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN of SOUTHOLD
February 27, '1987
Lee E. Koppelman, Director
Suffolk County Department of Planning
H. Lee Dennison Building - 12th Floor
Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
Dear Dr. Koppelrr an:
In accordance with the Suffolk County Charter, notice is hereby
given that the Southold Town Board, at their*regular meeting held on
February 24, 1987, granted a change of zone from "M" Light Multiple
Residence District to "AHD" Affordable Housing Cistrict to John A.
Costello, on certain property located at the intersection of Moores
Lane and County Route 48, Greenport, Town of Southold, a copy of
which proposal and map was transmitted fo your office on December
9, 1986.
1 shall be awaiting notification from your Planning Commission
with respect to the effective date of this change of zone.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
cc: John A. Costello"
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS
ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR
MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1987:
WHEREAS, a petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the
Town of Southold by ....John..A....COS.tel.lo.................................................
requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone
Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chong-
"M" Light Multiple "AHD" Affordable
ing from ..........Residence.............. District to ............Housing.................
District the property described in said petition, and
WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board for its
investigation, recommendation and reporj, and its report having been filed
with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said
petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the .....ZQth.......day
of .........Aanuary 1 19.87.., and due deliberation having been
had thereon
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said
petition be, and it hereby is GRANTED.
Dated: February 24, 1987.
By Order of the Southold Town Board.
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Cle7
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO
SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 121
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at a meeting of the Town Board
of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, held on the 3rd day
of December, 1985, the Town Board enacted the following amendment to the
Town Code entitled, "Code of the Town of Southold", together with the
4
Building Zone Map forming a part thereof as follows, to wit:
Amendment No. 121 amends the Code of the Town of Southold by changing
from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence
District the property of John A. Costello situated at Greenport, Town of
Southold, and more particularly bounded and described as follows :
BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the easterly line of Moore's
Lane with the southerly line of Middle Road .(County Road 48) , said point
being the northwesterly corner of the premises herein described; running
thence along said southerly line of Middle Road three courses: ( 1) North 66
degrees, 09 minutes, 10 seconds East 96.61 feet; thence (2) North 69 degrees,
02 minutes, 10 seconds East 985. 10 feet; thence (3) North 71 degrees 28
minutes 20 seconds East 312. 64 feet to the westerly line of a subdivision known
as "Fleetfield"; thence along said westerly line of "Fleetfield", South 16 degrees
01 minutes 50 seconds East 1450. 11 feet to land of Village of Greenport; thence
along said land of Village of Greenport, two courses: (1) South 58 degrees,
15 minutes 00 seconds West 714. 04 feet; thence (2) South 74 degrees, 45
minutes 00 seconds West 670. 00 feet to said easterly line of Moore's Lane;
thence along said easterly line of Moore'.s Lane, North 17 degrees, 15 minutes,
00 seconds West 1523.22 feet to the point of BEGINNING. Containing 48. 7186
acres.
DATED: December 3, 1985.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, DECEMBER 12, 1985, AND FORWARD ONE (1)
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK,
TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971.
• Copies to the following:
The Suffolk Times
The Long Island Traveler-Watchman
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
John A:. Costello
APPENDIX N0. 5
f
SITE PLAN SK-1
NOT ENCLOSED
SUBMITTED WITH ORIGINAL DRAFT
A - 5
APPENDIX NO. 6
t
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATION OF THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS
NOT ENCLOSED
SUBMITTED WITH ORIGINAL DRAFT
A - 6
APPENDIX NO. 7
E. I .S. SCOPING CHECKLIST
A - 7
5�FF0(k
P D
T � LD
S Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
March 17, 1987
Merlon Wiggin, President
Peconic Associates
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, NY 11944
a
Re: EIS Process for "Mooresland"
and Costello Affordable Housing
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
Upon consultation with David Emilita, the Board feels
that :a combined EIS process is the most comprehensive and
expedient method to evaluate the two projects. Consequently,
one EIS should be prepared containig text sections pertinent
to either one or the other development or a combined section
when addressing undifferentiated impacts. We have prepared
a single scoping checklist based on your two checklists and
on input from the Town Board, that contains a suggested treatment
of each section. Please review- it and if agreeable use it
as your outline for the EIS.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
the Planning Board office or David Emilita.
Very truly yours,
ennett Orlowski,Jr. , Chairman
dms Southold Town Planning Board
enc.
cc: Town Board
John Costello
Donald Bracken
Diane Carroll
LJ✓v r it7 1't 4►-tJ V�� ✓ w+-�.--�*-a YJ r i—w►wIP. P
.++ "K
_ • ,' ,,r. '•t fe Sirs-] ,.
Mdel ,f,r .a
o EIS s:i:f:,� . ::k.�.��: .
' - • • •- i ':^•k't':!';-•','i raj!' '• tRyu'%��:IY1
!-.-Scoping . Checklist-
1. Cover Sheet
Introduction All EIS's(Dra ' ' 1 {
ft or Final)shall begin with a cover
The Following checklist of topics is intended sheet that indicates:A. Whether it is a draft or final statement
as a starting point for developing a detailed scope B. name or other descriptive title of the project
for a project specific Draft Environmental Impact C. Location(county and town,village or city)of
Statement. Typically, no one project will require a the project '
discussion of all the topic areas contained in this D. name and address of the lead agency which
document. Through the scoping process, this list of required preparation of the statement and
topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the name and telephone number of a person
the proposed project. Topic areas may be delete, at the agency to be contacted for.further in-
added, or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final formation
scoping document. E. name and address of the preparers of any
The purpose of the checklist format is to portion of the statement and a contact name
identify the basic topic areas for the Draft EIS.This and telephone number
is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS
check in the box located to the left of those topics G. In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline date
which should be discussed. The model scoping by which comments are due should be in..
checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including dicated
comments, suggestions and identification of the j
particular examples) that are relevant to a detailed IL Table of Contents and Summary
discussion of the topic or issue that has been check-
ed. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, quired for Draft and Final EIS's exceeding 10 pages
are issues not associated with the project, and may in length. However, one should include these
be eliminated from discussion in the Draft EIS. features in any size EIS to provide the review agency
Minimum requirements for any Draft EIS are with easy reference to EIS topics. 1
already checked for convenience. The summary should Include:
The next step is to expand the list to include A. brief description of the action
or elaborate on those topics unique to the proposed B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impact**..
project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the (issues of controversy must be specified) 1
checklist for such additional information. - C. Mitigation measures proposed
The scoping process involves several steps in D. Alternatives considered
addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals.
includes discussiors on the quantity and quality of funding)
information required and the methods for obtaining �.
that data. Ill. Description of the Proposed Action
Place a check in the box to the left of those
NOTE: This checklist was designed to bg topics to be included in the draft EIS.
used in conjunction with the section on scoping con-
tained in the SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. A. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
It is also important to emphasize that this checklist tel. Background and history '
should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping 1,-2. Public need for the project, and
_ of a Draft EIS. It should not be used as a substitute municipality objectives based on adopted
for actively scoping a Draft EIS for a specific pro community development plans }
3 `
ject. Q®- . Objectives of the project sponsor ' *:
'4
x
• .0
a B. LOCATION Natural Resources
vl. Establish geographic boundaries of the 5d & GEOLOGY .
project (use of regional and local scale 1. Subsurface
maps is recommended) a.)composition and thickness of
tom. Description of access to site subsurface material ,
y'Description of existing zoning of propos- examples:
ed site —depth to, and nature of. bed-
4. Other: rock formations and imperme-
ZI:> able layers „
® C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT J —occurrence of an extractive
trl. Total site area mineral resource
a.)proposed impervious surface area —usefulness as construction
(roofs. parking lots, roads) material
b.)amount of land to be cleared b.)earthquake potential
c.)open space 2. Surface
Structures tve.)list of soil types
a.)gross leaseable area (GLA), if ap• *p-&.)discussion of soil characteristics
plicable examples:
b.)layout of buildings (attached, enclos- 41 —physical properties (indication
ed, separate) of soils hydrological (infiltra- '
c.)site plans and profile views tion) capabilities)
L.-3,. Parking —engineering properties (soil
a.)pavement area bearing capacity)
b.)number of spaces and layout c.)distribution of soil types at pro-
2� 4. Other: ject site
vti.)suitability for use
D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION examples:
{/}. Construction —agriculture
a.)total construction period anticipated' —recreation
b.)schedule of construction —construction
c.)future potential development, on site —mining
or on adjoining properties e.) other: -
d.)other:
2. Operation �3. Topography
a.)type of operation fid.)description of topography at pro-
b.)schedule of operation esite
examples:
c.)other: examples: - -
—slopes
❑ E. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS - —prominent or unique features
(for projects of planned limited life such as b.)description of topography of sur.
/landfills)
rounding area
91 B. WATER RESOURCES
t BF. APPROVALS [}''1. Groundwater
1 1. Required changes or variances to the zon- tom,)location and description of
ing regulations aquifers and recharge areas
2. Other permit approval or funding re- examples:
quirements —depth to water table
—seasonal variation
IV. Environmental Setting —quality
Place a check in the box to the left of those —quantity
topics to be included in the Draft EIS. —flow
C-2
6-00"b.)identification of present uses and c.)identification of any sensitive
level of use of groundwater receptors in project area
examples: examples:
—location of existing wells —hospitals, schools, nursing
—public/private water supply homes, parks
—industrial uses d.)description of existing monitor.
—agricultural uses ing program (If applicable)
❑ 2. Surface water [ ''D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY
a.) location and description of sur- t 1. Vegetation
face waters located on project ,,,.e•)list vegetation types on the pro-
site or those that may be in- ject site and within the surround-
fluenced by the project Ing area
examples: .sb.)discussion of site vegetation
—seasonal variation characteristics
—quality examples:
—classification according to —species present and abundance r
New York State Department of —age
Health —size
b.)identification of uses and level of —distribution 'r
use of all surface waters —dominance
examples: —community types
—public/private water supply —unique, rare and endangered
—industrial uses species `
—agricultural uses —value as habitat for wildlife
—recreation —productivity
c.)description of existing drainage
areas, patterns and channels � 2• Fish and Wildlife
a.)list of fish and wildlife species on
d.)discussion of potential for
flooding, siltation, erosion and the project site and within sur•
rounding area, including
eutrophication of water sources
migratory and resident species
❑ C. AIR RESOURCES b.)discussion of fish and wildlife
population characteristics -
❑ 1. Climate examples:
a.)discussion of seasonal variations —species present and abundance
and extremes —distribution -
examples: —dominance
—temperature —unique, rare and endangered
—humidity - species
—precipitation —productivity
—wind
❑ 3. Wetlands ;
❑ 2. Air quality tiuous to the project site a.)list wetland areas within or con-
a.)description of existing air quality 9 P 1
levels b.)discuss wetland characteristics
examples: examples:
—list the National and State Air —acreage
;f
Quality Standards for the pro- —vegetative cover
ject area and the compliance —classification '
status for each standard —benefits of wetland such as
b.)identification of existing sources flood and erosion control,
or polIutants•fixed or mobile recreation a
C-3
C
[�^C- COMMUNITY SERVICES(for this section in-
Human Resources
clude a list of existing facilities and a discus-
A. TRANSPORTATION sion of existing levels of usage and pro-
1. Transportation services jected future needs)
w,a.)description of the size, capacity 2'11. Educational facilities
and condition of services
examples: 9*2. Police protection
—roads. canals, railroads. 2.3. Fire protection
bridges
—parking facilities [a''4. Health care facilities
—traffic control ['5. Social services „
to4J description of current level of use Pot. Recreational facilities
of services
( `7.
examples: Utilities
—a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic ❑ B. Other:
flow
—vehicle mix
—sources of existing traffic ®"D. DEMOGRAPHY
volume [E t• Population characteristics
❑ 2. Public transportation t,<discussion of the existing popula-
a.)description of the current tion parameters
availability of service examples:
b.)description of present level of —distribution C
use —density
❑ 3. Pedestrian environment
—household size and composi-
tion
❑ 4. Other: b.)discussion of projections for
population growth
'B. LAND USE AND ZONING ❑ 2. Other:
�1. Existing land use and zoning '
6,al description of the existing land
use of the project site and the �E• CULTURAL RESOURCES
surrounding area (�" 1. Visual resources
examples: *4.)description of the physical
—commercial character of the community
—residential example: • 7
—agricultural —urban vs. rural •�'
—business description of natural areas of
—retail significant scenic value
—industrial c.) identification of structures of
—vacant significant architectural design
.)description of the existing zoning (l 2• Historic and archaeological '
of site and surrounding area resources
❑ 2. Land use plans a.) location and description of
a.)description of any land use plans historic areas or structures listed
or master plans which include on State or National Register or a
project site and surrounding area designated by the community
b.)discussion of future development b.)identification of sites having _�..
trends or pressures potential significant ar-
❑ 3. Other: chaeological value
E,
}
.Y
It
C-4
❑ 3. Noise Ca`B. WATER RESOURCES
a.)identification of existing level of 1. Groundwater
noise in the community tr-d.)design adequate system of treat-
b. identification of major sources of ment for stormwater runoff prior
noise to recharge of groundwater ,
examples: t-rb.)maintain permeable areas on the
—airports site
—major highways c.)institute a program for monitor.
—industrial/commercial facili- ing water quality in adjacent
ties wells
d.)other:
❑ 4. Other: 2. Surface water
a.)ensure use of soil erosion control
4JSa V. Significant Environmental Impacts techniques during construction
At 1r1MIdentify those aspects of the environmental set- and operation to avoid siltation
ting in Section IV that may be adversely or examples:
���
5 beneficially affected by the proposed action and re- —hay bales
quire discussion. � —temporary restoration of
AVI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmen- vegetation to disturbed areas ;
tal Impact —landscaping
Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential L--&j design adequate stormwater con-
adverse impacts identified in Section V. The follow- trol system
Ing is a brief listing of typical measures used for c.) restrict use of salt or sand for
some of the major areas of impact. road and parking area snow
removal
Natural Resources d.)avoid direct discharges to surface
water resources
M ❑ A. GEOLOGY e.)other:
1. Subsurface
a.)use excavated material for land
reclamation
b.)use facility wastes (ash. sludge)
for land reclamation &"C. AIR RESOURCES
c.)other: 1. Air quality
✓L. Surface t..z.)assure proper construction prat-
a.)use topsoil stockpiled during tices
construction for restoration and examples: "
landscaping _ —fugitive dust control
b.)minimize disturbance of non- —proper_ operation and
construction sites maintenance of cdnstruction
c.)design and implement soil ero- equipment ,r-
sion control plan b.)design traffic improvements to
d.)other: reduce congestion and vehicle
3. Topography delay
a.)avoid construction on areas of c.)install and ensure the proper
steep slope operation of emission control
b.)design adequate soil erosion devices
devices to protect areas of steep d.)initiate a program for monitoring
slope of air quality
c.)other: e.)other:
C-5
�.-_._. ._ _. _.__.�� _ ..�...-......n....,»...,-...,.......�,.,..--........,+naw+r.w.+--^._�.,.,..r.,....-.._ .. _ . ...Y. ....�,�...ti,�,"_
ti
B-D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY!A 018. LAPID USE AND ZONING
1. Vegetation 111 1. Existing land use and zoning
ya.)restrict clearing to only those we a.)design project to comply with ex-
areas necessary fisting land use plans
✓b.)preserve part of site as a natural vb.)design functional and visually ap-
area pealing facility to set standard
Vc.)after construction, landscape site and precedent for future
with naturally occurring vegeta- surrounding land use
tion c.)other:
d.)purchase open space at another , [-C. COMMUNITY SERVICES
location and dedicate to local 1. Police protection
government or conservation a.)minimize local police protection
organization responsibilities by providing
e.)other: private security force
2. Fish and Wildlife b.)provide security systems, alarms
a.)provide adequate habitat(shelter for facility ,
and food) for remaining wildlife 4, c.)provide equipment, funds or ser.
+ �s
species vices directly to the community
b.)schedule construction to avoid d.)other: ...
sensitive periods of fish and ✓2. Fire protection
wildlife life cycles tea.)use construction materials that
c.)other: minimize fire hazards
✓ b.)incorporate sprinkler and alarm C
systems into building design
c.)provide equipment, funds or ser*
vices directly to the community
Human Resources d.)other:
9'"A. TRANSPORTATION V-•3. Utilities
1. Transportation services �-aj install utility services
ya.)design adequate and safe access underground
to project site to handle pro- L--b.)incorporate-water saving fixtures
jected traffic flow into facility design
b.)install adequate traffic control i►�c-)incorporate energy-saving
devices measures_ into facility design
✓c.)optimize use of parking areas d.)other:
d.)encourage car pooling and opera-MR-D. CULTURAL RESOURCES
tion of facility during non-peak
..A. Visual resources 'tir.r•
traffic times - ✓s.)design exterior of structure to
e.)design special routing and physically blend with existing
restricted hours for delivery truck surroundings
traffic vb.)minimize visual impact through ,
L) other: thoughtful and innovative design
2. Public transportation of lighting and signs (consider:
a.)adjust public transportation height, size, intensity, glare and
routes and schedules to service hours of lighting operation)
the facility t-""c.)design landscaping to be visually
b.)encourage use of public transpor- pleasing and to serve as a buffer 1
tation by using incentive pro- between surrounding land uses,
grams for employees or by sell- parking areas, operational equip.
ing tickets in facility ment and facilities t
c.)other: d.)other:
C•6
2. Historic and archaeologic resources ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND11
a.)allow historical and ar- TECHNOLOGIES
chaeological officials access to +--T. Site layout
the project site during excavation a.)density and location of structures
b.)devote space within project site b.)location of access routes, park.
to a display of historical and ar- Ing and utility routes
chaeological artifacts of local in- w-12. Orientation
terest a.)compatibility with slope and
c.)preserve architecturally signifi• drainage patterns '
cant structures and make a b.)site size and setback re-, ,
photographic and statistical quirements
record of those that must be 3. Technology 4
destroyed a.)pollution control equipment
d.)other: b.)Innovative vs. proven
.Noise technologies
fin:)schedule construction/operation 4. Mix of activities -
to occur during "normal a.)addition of businesses which y
business" hours minimizingr would affect the operational
noise impact during sensitive nature of the facility
times(early morning. night)
6--b.)assure adherence to construction
noise standards . ALTERNATIVE SITES �
c.)design berms and landscaping to ✓l. Limiting factors
block and absorb noise a.)availability of land •. ,
d.)other: b.)suitability of alternate site to ac-
comodate design requirements
c.)availability of utilities
d.)suitable market area
e.)compatibility with local zoning
VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot and master plan
(�( be Avoided if the Project is Implemented f.) compatibility with regional ob.
r"1 Identify those adverse environmental effects in jectives
Section V that can be expected to occur regardless g.)accessibility of site to transporta-
of the mitigation measures considered in Section tion routes and the service
VI. population
ALTERNATIVE SIZE
Increase or decrease project size to
minimize possible impacts
Increase or decrease project size to
A Vill. Alternatives correspond to market and com• ,
This section contains categories of alternatives munity needs -
with examples. Discussion of each alternative
should be at a level sufficient to permit a com-
parative assessment of costs, benefits and en- ❑ D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERA-.'
vironmental risks for each alternative. It is not ac- TION SCHEDULING ,
ceptable to make simple assertions that a particular 1. Commence construction at a dif-
alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those ferent time
categories of alternatives which should be included 2. Phase construction/operation
in the EIS by placing a chick in the box located to 3. Restrict construction/operation
the left of the topic. work schedule
r•
C-7 ru
XI. Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy -
�E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE Resources
.4--Suitability of site for other uses Identify the energy sources to be used, an.
a.) other types of commercial uses ticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce
b.)other types of industry energy consumption.The examples listed below are
•�L)different types of housing typical issues to be considered when addressing this :r
d.)other: topic.
2. Public vs. private use '
NO ACTION C CrA. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND �
ALTERNATIVES
wwt- Impacts of no action
a.)effect on public need ( ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG-TERM "
b.)effect on private developers'need LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION t
c.)beneficial or adverse en-
vironmental impacts ❑ C. INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON-
SUMPTION
❑ G. OTHER: 1. Increased dependence on
automobile use
IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of 2. Increased levels of traffic due to pro-
A Resources posed project
11. Identify those natural and human resources liste ��. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
in Section IV that will be consumed. converted o L-1--Design methods to reduce fuel use
made unavailable for future use. for heating, cooling, and lighting
X. Growth Inducing Aspects �•)conventional technology
Describe in this section the potential growth examples:
1 aspects the proposed project may have. Listed —insulation
below are examples of topics that are typically af• —thermopane windows
fected by the growth induced by a project. —use of low wattage lights
Q'A. POPULATION mob.)innovative technology
1. Increases in business and resident examples:
population due to the creation or —heat pumps
relocation of business —solar panels
tit. Increases in resident population due —wind energy
to the construction of housing —use of waste heat from an in-
dustrial plant
❑ B. SUPPORT FACILITIES 6,e.tefficient layout
1. Businesses created to serve the in- examples:
- —orientation of structures in
creased population
relation to summer and winter
2. Service industries created to supply
sunlight
new facility
t,,,--clustering of structures to
❑ C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL maximize common walls
1. Introduction or improvement of in- ✓-=shortening of utility runs
frastructure (roads, waste disposal, ,,,.,-shared insulation and heating
sewers, water) to service proposed 2. Indirect energy benefits
a.) location and design of facility to
project accomodate mass transit
2. Creation of further growth potential '
b.)use of shuttle buses
by construction of improved in- c.) location of facility to minimize
frastructure
travel distance
❑ D. OTHER: ❑ E. OTHER: yi
C-8
t
G XII. Appendices ,
Following is a list of materials typically used in
support of the EIS.
A. List of underlying studies, reports and infor-
mation considered and relied on in preparing state-
ment
B. List all federal, state, regional, or local agen-
cies, organizations, consultants and private persons
consulted in preparing the statement
C. Technical exhibits(if any) at a legible scale
D. Relevant correspondence regarding the pro-
jects may be included(required in the Final EIS)
Additional Draft EIS Scoping Topics
Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the
Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
a
'a
C-9
A 9 }
_!EPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
TO: Southold Planning Board
RE: Costello Rezoning DEIS
FROM: David Emilita j
DATE: 11/25/85
The Planning Board should go on 'record with regard to the Costello
Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one
prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its
content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This
project, however, has potentially significant and different
impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These
are as follows:
1) "M" Zone vs "HD" District
The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated
desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor
will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It
is thus recommended that the "HD' Distxict be applied to this site
as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions
should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of
affordable housing as defined by the Town.
2) Impact on on-site-well
It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180
dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of
recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the ,
County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard.
Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there
will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater
collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers
and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater.
The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been
stated.
Input from the Village of Greenport 's water system and from the
Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in
the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be
unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the
annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don' t feel
this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR. )
In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning ,
proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure
the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved.
DE/jmb " `-
_, - 01 (Y)azc rnn1% A*)1-nn'An
APPENDIX NO. 8
c
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATION OF THE
TOWN HOUSE BUILDING UNITS
NOT ENCLOSED
SUBMITTED WITH ORIGINAL DRAFT
A - 8
APPENDIX NO. 9
TEST HOLE DATA SHEETS
A - 9
McDONALD
GBOSCISNCB
Box 1000 • Southold,New York 11671 0 (518)785.3677
TEST HOLE DATA SHEET
Name: Costello Peconic Assoc. Boring #1
S.
Surveyor:
Location: Greanport
Tax Map Number:
Project Description: Drainage
Date: 4/22/87
Dark brown loam
--------- 1.4'
Brown coarse and very coarse sands with 20-400 gravol
--------- 14'
Water in brown coarse dnd very coarse sand
18'
Comments:
MCDONALD
GE0SCIENCB
Box 1000 • Southold.New York 11971 0 (515)785-3677
TEST HOLE DATA SHEET
Name: Costello Peconic Assoc. Boring #2
Surveyor:
Location: Greenport
Tax Map Number:
Project Description: Drainage
Date: 4/22/87
Brown coarse sand with 30% gravel
--------- 3.5'
Brownish grey sandy silt with 15% gravel
--------- 7.5'
Brom coarse sand
--------- 12'
Greyish brown silty sand
--------- 13.5'
Water in pale brown coarse sand
18,
Comments:
T '
MW ON LD
GEOSCIENCE
Box l000 • Southold,Now York 11971 • (516)765-3677
TEST HOLE DATA SHEET
Name: Costello Peconic Assoc. Boring #3
Surveyor:
Location: Greenport
Tax Map Number:
Project Description: Drainage
Date: 4/22/87
Daric brown sandy loam
--------- 10"
e
Bro;Yn coarse and very coarse sand with 15w gravel
(some layers 30', Travel)
10'
Comments: Goring st�?j.,ed by iieavy gavel
l `
McDONALD
GEOSUENCE
Box 1000 • Southold.New York 11971 • (515)765-3677
TEST HOLE DATA SHEET
Name: Costello Peconic Assoc. Boring #4
Surveyor:
Location: Greenport
Tax Map Number:
Project Description: Drainage
Date: 4/22/87
Broim sandy silt
--------- 2.6'
Brogan coarses sand with greater than 501. gravel
---------- 7.4'
Water in brmai coarse sand with greater than 50% gravel
---------- M 8.5'
Water in brown coarse and eery coarse sand -with 2011, gravel
13'
Comments:
APPENDIX NO. 18
LISTING OF COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES
A - 10
648
Services
ANIMAL SHELTERS&POUNDS COURTS(cont.)
Babylon...........................................643-9270 Second District-Babylon.................669-6100
Brookhaven......................................286-4940 Third District-Huntington Station.....423-3200
Huntington......................................757-8180 Fourth District-Hauppauge...........360-5406/7
Islip.................................................224-5880 Fifth District-Bay Shore..................666-2600
' Smithtown.......................................360-7575 Sixth District-Patchogue.................289-36
00
Southampton-„...............................653-5900 EMPLOYMENT&UNEMPLOYMENT
Southold......................................... 765-1811 NYS Dept.of Labor,Job Service Division
Bide-A-Wee Home Association.Inc. Bay Shore........................................668-0206
Old Country Rd..Westhampton..........325-0200 Hauppauge......................................360-6500
Huntington Dog Club,Inc. Huntington Station...........................873-1500
Little Shelter,33 Warner Rd...............368-8770 Patchogue.......................................758-7700
Kent Animal Shelter 340
Calverton........................................727-5731 Riverhead........................................727-4
North Shore Animal League Unemployment:
..883-7575 Bay Shorp........................................666-7480
Pon Washington............................ Hauppauge......................................360-6501
The Grateful Paw Cat Shelter Huntington Station...........................673-1530
I i 104 Deposit Road
' East Northport.................................757-4517 Patchogue. .758-7777
i 727-4340
BLOOD DONATIONS Riverhead.......
.......... .........
FEDERALJOB
Melville: 155 Duryea Road..................752-7300 Federal Wage&Hour Division............727-4340
Patchogue:7799 South Street............289-1414 Worker's Compensation Board
CIVIL SERVICE Hempstead....................................486-4300
Suffolk County...............................
..348-5400 e, New York State.....................(718)802-6600
i
New York State.......................(212)488-4248 HOUSING
Federal Job Information Center.(212)264-0422 Housing&Heat Complaints...350-3000 Ext.40
1 CONSUMER SERVICES Suffolk Community
Auto Repair Complaints...........(800)342-3823 Development Corp.........................698-8201
Better Business Bureau of Long Island Suffolk Housing Service....................724-6920
i Advises on pre-purchase inquiries Mortgage Default Counseling Service
Ij( and records complaints on Long Island Rent Control.New York State............481-9494
tI companies......................................420-0500
Federal Communication HUMAN RIGHTS
Commission.................(212)620-3438/3437 Suffolk County Human Rights Commission
Suffolk County Office of Consumer Affairs 65 Jetson Lane,Central Islip..............348-5380
Complaint Line
New York State Commission
` Hauppauge .360-4600 Hempstead� .....................................538-1360
......................................' Riverhead .548-3456 New York State Civil Liberties Union
"- �• Energy Complaints...........................548-3459 Defends individual liberties guaranteed
!: Weights&Measures Division.............548-3459 by the Bill of Rights.Suffolk Chapter:
To check on whether a home 1600 Islip Ave,Brentwood................234-9403
' improvement contractor is licensed.....360-4588 LAW ENFORCEMENT
New York State Office of the (Local Police are listed on Page 1)
Attorney General..............................360-6196 Suffolk County:
jl New York State Public Service Commission pistrict Attorney
Complaints call..................... (212)219-3550
Hauppauge................................... .360-4161
x' Communications.....................(212)488-5330
• Riverhead........................................548-3500
Electric................................ .(212)219-3550 jail................................................548-3200
' f Gas......................... (212)219-3550 -5000 Department 288-5000
Water(non-municipal)............ .(212)219-4390 Probation Departments
t • COURTS Bay Shore............................ ....666-2600
► New York Supreme Court Hauppauge.....................360-5337,360-5250
Riverhead........................ .....548-3785 Riverhead.......................................548-3800
.i ................360-5462 Yaphank.........................................924-4300
Hauppauge..........._.....
�
Central Jury Department 360-4503 Sheriff's Office
Small Claims Court Riverhead.......................................548-3200
See closest District Court Westhampton.................................288-3700
Suffolk County Court........................548-3185 FBI
.r Surrogate Court...............................548-3666 Hauppauge.....................................234-1186
Family Court(Gent Info.)...................360 4274
For 24-hour service..................(212)553-2700
' Districts Courts: New York State Police......................277-8190
Central Traffic............... .....360-4556 New York State Park Police
;Y
First District: Babylon.............. 66925
....................
Civil...............................................360-5400 N.Y.State Division of Parole
Nassau-Suffolk
Criminal Criminal..........................................360-53 55
Traffic............................................360-4556 Hempstead ....485-2660
tit* i �.
t �
' .649-
Services
649-
Services 77
LEGAL SERVICES RECORDS.I. ENSES,
j' 4you need an attorney,look in the CERTIFICATES
,ossified section under'Lawyers' Babylon
am the alphabetical section white pages) 957-3005
P ( P 9 ) Brookhaven...................................654-7800
.............. East Hampton.............. . . _
of. .548-3762 Huntington...................... ... 351-3206
Islip. ,. ....
•Swiniunity Legal Assistance .. -5934 •• •224-6490 ,.-
f +} CorpCorp. .680 Riverhead..... .......................:..... 727-3200 . ,.,.
Shelter Island. .749-1166:
Aid Society of Suffolk County Smithtown..................• .............
. ...
_360 y `
" liminal Division: •r►• •r -7620 •
Southampton.................................283-6000.• �.
%%head.......................................548-3366 Southold.
.ftuppauge.....................................360-5212 ,..... ... .,...765-1801 r ?r
x Suffolk County Clerk.......................548-3432. • 0 Y�
,a.Services Committee,Inc.(Nassau-Suffolk) Mortgage information,documents and.
. 10
Uv Shore.......................................666-1225 records on file or to be filed .• �
stead.....................................292-8100 ;R
4.erhead.......................................369-1112 SOCIAL SERVICES
. 10� .:
MOTOR VEHICLES Public Assistance Information...........348-4000 .��
Food Stamps Information................_..348-4040 ' ': �2fS,
,,MAbik County Motor Vehicle Information Bureau "
«noses,Permits,Registrations „ • �s ! tS, t4
Z TAX INFORMATION
Latem&Western Suffolk V.S.Government:
Revenue Service
iwaral Information..........................369-0500 4
Federal income tax information, ..
<�benches: forms&assistance...........................724-5000- -" I
444 Route 111,Smithtown 1.1787
' -fry Shore-1700 Union Blvd. ` ' �- �•r``
'*uppauge-Veterans Memorial Hwy 518 E.Main St.,Riverhead , ,: ,
4.erhead-Route 58 ' .'zt7
New York-State of: ` --
< t-S.Dept.of Motor Vehicles Department of Taxation&Finance „
` flits Office Bldg.,Hauppauge 11787 State Office Building,Veterans'
-zgders-Auto Schools.......:............._ 360-6316 Memorial Highway.Hauppauge 11787
_.._.
. i
[nforcement............................360-6321,24
`.sung&Investigation Unit..........360-6315,19 Income Tax Assistance....,,....(8001342-3536
` :•A%ed Test Appointments 360-6316
1 .................. Estate Tax.....................................360-6280
Income Tax forms..................(800)462-8100 ,
=z' _ NATURALIZATION&IMMIGRATION
e..rpration&Naturalization Service $ales Tax..............................(800)342-3536
wertment of Justice
Tax Compliance... 360-6744
. A Federal Plaza.N.Y. 10278....(212)206-6500
r All other matters..."*".*'.**"***"*"*"***",.... . ...... ... .......360-6700
i J- .y
` PASSPORTS VETERANS
�a548-3432
SuIk County
Veteranserans Service Agen
�wnYCenter 11901Central Islip.....................
8-5490
Riverhead........... 3080
t : .....548- �.
v +�A.gort Requirements: ti' .�•
V A.Hospital&Drug Unit copy of birth certificate raised Brooklyn .........(718)836-6600
'
4-vers license or identifying witness with Northport.......................................261-4440
t • #vofs license.
+' :#"spon photos 2x2-head and shoulders- Veterans Administration
` Regional Office.............I.......... "
-�:• *.ctc and white or colored,non-glossy 9 (212)620-6901
.der 18$27.00 check or money order t
18$42.00 new passport,$35 00 renewal VOTER INFORMATION
n Travelers to certain foreign countries Suffolk County Board of Elections
4iw be required to show proof of immunization. For information on registration,enrollment,
rfrormation call.............................548-3432 primary elections,general elections,
absentee registration,absentee ballots, i
! U.S.COAST polling places,political party offices. t
' GUARD k a
Shore.......................................261-6868 General information ......924-4300
-"%"t End.............. ........661-9100 Suffolk County league of i
-,;)ms End.........................................728-1171 Women
•.�� =�': ;"!;�„=. Voters.................................751-0856 t'
;.•'- _Vii:
�.
: ` _ 7 '1A 1:;31 q�ct�y�
APPENDIX NO. 11
s
GREENPORT WATER DEPARTMENT
REGULATIONS FOR SYSTEM SUSTAINED AND SELF-SUSTAINED
WATER SUPPLY CATEGORIES
A - 11
II .
BE IT RESOLVED that the regulations of the Greenport Water
Department are hereby ammended as follows:
All applications for water hook up to the Greenport Water
System which lie outside the villnye boundaries and which are not
in sub-divisions of four lots or less, shall be either one of two-
categories: 1) Catagory A - System Sustained, or 2 ) Catagory 8 -
self-sustained.
DEFINITIONSt
APPLICANT -- any person or firm making
application for connection to the.11 Greenport Water System.
CATAGORY A - SYSTEM SUSTAINED - any sub-
division, development or facility which is dependent on the
Greenport Water System to provide water to the subdivision, deve-
lopment or facility without contributing at least the same• amount
of water as the projected demand to be used by the subdivision,
development or facility.
,CATAGORY B - SELF-SUSTAINED - Any sub-
division, development or facility which provides water equal to or
in excess of projected demand, whether on-site or off-site.
MAJOR SUBDIVISION - Any subdivision of land
resulting in more than four ( 4 ) building lots.
MINOR SUBDIVISION - Any subdivision of land
resulting in four ( 4 ) or less building lots.
OFF-SITE SYSTEM - any water production
1
system which is not on the site of the applicant.
ON SITE SYSTEM -- any water production
system which is on the site of the applicant. I
PROJECTED DEMAND - that water demand which
in anticipated to be used by the subdivision, development or faci-
lity as determined by the superintendent of the village water
department.
WATER QUALITY - that water wnich is
suitable for human consumption by compliance with the parameters
established by the U.S. , the State of New York, the County of •
Suffolk and the Suprintendant of Utilities.
If
CATAGORY A -- SYSTEM SUSTAINED APPLICATIONS
1 . Applicant -shall meet with Superintendent of Utilities
regarding rules, regulations and specifications.
. . Applicant shall submit apolication to the Superintendent
of Utilities in complete detail showing all proposed piping and
specifications.
. . If application complies with rules, requlations, and
specifications, the Superintendent 'of Utilities shall refer the
application to the Utility Committee for action.
. . the applicant shall appear before the Utility Committee at
which time plans, details, and specifications shall be approved or
disapproved by said committee. If the plans the plans, details
and specifications are disapproved by said the Utility Committee,
the applicant shall resubmit a corrected application complying
ti -'- with the requirements of the Utility Committee.
1
. . If the application complies with the rules, regulations,
xw and specifications, the Utility Committee shall place the appli-
cation on a list which list shall be maintained in chronological
order of approval for service to be ,supplied when potable water ie
h; available for that application.
` . . However in the case of minor subdivisions, the Village
Board of Trustees may authorize a contract for the supply of water
to be entered into immediately.
CATAGORY 8 -- SELF SUSTAINED APPLICATIONS
1 . Applicant shall meet with Superintendent of Water I
Utilities regarding projected amount and quality of the potable
water supply, rules, regulations and specifications.
. . Applicant must than submit application together with water
test data as to amount and quality of the on-site or off-site
water supply to the Superintendent of Water Utilities.
& : . . A test well is then to be drilled, the water supply
"drawn down", and water quality must meet the requirements of the
i' Suffolk County, State of New York or United States, and the water
quantity must be sufficient to supply all water requirements for
* the application in the opinion of the Superintendent of Utilities.
'; . . If the Superintendent finds that the test data as to
y
a. quality of water meets the strictest of the health
x
PP
standards required of Village of Greenport, Suffolk County, State '•
of New York or the United States government for potable water, and
be the amount of water available meats or exceeds the
` projected demand of the proposed subdivision, development or foci-':F�
lity as determined by the Superintendent with the assistance of ..
the Village engineers, and
t Q. it application complies with rules, regulatations,. a>ad-'
specifica�ions, the Superintendent of Utilities shell refer the
�r matter to the Utility Committee for consideration. �• � :.`.r'
iM t>: . . td' applicant shall appear before the Utility Committedat r�hx
which time
quality and quantity of potable water supply, plans,
details, and specifications shall be approved or disapproved by ' i .,
said committee. If the quality and/or quantity of potable water
supply, plana the plana, details and specifications are
disapproved by said the Utility Coaalittee, the applicant shalt
resubmit ' 'F •R
a corrected applLcatlotl t,t),(1j)1y1,1j With tha catlilictjin9nts -'
W,
R1 .w•
of th-3 Utitlty Cominittea. . '
• I1: the appltc-it-toll Ii ' L t 1 1:11. t 1: , ,11:,1 �.i Ia) ►�.�.
ju.i I -Y •1.1.1 ]1•.1•l�:t�:f �.).!=ltr. �.1 ��Y -��� � �;, ►r'ttt.�ndant '
of UtL1LtLost the rules, regulatLon3, and specifications, the
IUtility Committee shall forward the application to the Villa
qe
Board of Trustees for their approval. Vi a o 8pacd�ftu4tees. :�*�.
shall approve• the negotiations �q ,cV.qs4 ne. ..fot...sl.aontracttor the ';',..
.� supply of':water.
�'•� rl,; i ,moi ,'
POLICY DECLARATION REGARDING THE EXTENSION OR REPLACEMENT
OF MAINS BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF GREENPORT
The extenn ion Anti/or ropl.acement of mains both inn ido and
outside the Incorporated Village of Greenport shall be under such
terms and conditions at the Village Board of Trustees thereinafter
referred to as BOARD) from time to time may determine.
The following policy declaration is made as a guide:
The BOARD favors the replacement of old mains and the
extension of existing maims throughout the areas where it supplies
water. It does not propose to extend its distribution system so
that normal demand will tax its facilities for supplying water.
It has prime responsibilitity to the' r.egkdents of the Village. It
regards its operations both inside aid outside the Village as
effected with the oublic interest and purposes to conduct these
operations with the high standards expected of public service
corporations.
As a general rule the BOARD will agree to supply water
through any main of proper size ai►d condition for the location,
the cost of removing and/or laying of said mains will be paid by
the persons requestinq to be suoplied' therefrom.
In a proper case, where it appears reasonable to expect
that the demand for water will require the exteq.kjQp and/or repla-
cement warrant it, the BOARD may contract with the persons wishing
to extend and/or replace mains , and may assua►e._sl_pQ .A the
cost gf_ construction where the extension and/or replacement will
1
benefit a substantial number of other customefti or potpglial
customers.
When a substantial part of the cost of the extension
and/or replacement of mains is paid for by potential users, the
BOARD may contract to supply water for a period of up Lo.jQ years
without charge or by remanding the usual rents, such remand to be
limited, however, to the amount paid for the construction or a
proportionate share thereof .
The BOARD inclines to favor such replacement and/or
extensions as will enable it -to tie in with other replacemdnts
and/or extensions with new well supplies, and to loop the
franchise area so as to take in and inter-connect with the North
Fork Area System.
APPENDIX NO. 12
t
LETTER FROM SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
ON GROUNDWATER RECHARGE
14
A - 12
a- r2
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
PETER F.COHALAN
SUFFOLK COUNTY[X[CUTIV[ i
i
DAVID HARRIS.M.D..M.P.H.
:PARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CowwaslOm" i
February 14, 1985
I
!
Merlon E. Wiggin, Ph.D. , M.E. !
I
President !
Peconic Associates, Inc. I !
One Bootleg Alley
P. 0. Box 672
Greenport, New York 11944
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
-"BJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - ANNEXATION PROPOSAL - I
VILLAGE OF GREENPORT (JOHN COSTELLO) !
Your letter of February 6, 1985 and the attached sketch plan for the proposed '
development of the 48.718 acre parcel bordering the Village of Greenport has
been reviewed in light of the questions you set forth.
You must keep in mind that the comments set forth are based on the "very preliminary
planning stage" of your project. Each of your questions will be addressed in the i
same order as they are listed in your letter.
i
1. Surface run-off and impact to groundwater recharge stormwater run-off I
and recharge is not normally a function of the Department'of Health
Services unless it is proposed to discharge the water directly into
a surface water system. If such a proposal is made, the Department
would not consider this a satisfactory method of disposal unless the
receiving waters had been classified as "D" or "SD" which denotes that i
the best useage for that body of surface water was for drainage purposes.
If a surface water discharge is not permissable then all stormwater must
be disposed of on site to either a recharge basin or stormwater leaching
pools. This is generally a function of the Town or Village Planning Board.
If all on site stormwater is disposed of on site, there should not be
any adverse impact on groundwater recharge, in fact, an argument can be
made that since the stormwater is directed to recharge facilities that
the amount of recharge is actually increased.
RANIM0 DRIVE[AST
-PAUGC.Ky.11740
rlon E. Wiggin, Ph.D. , M.E.
Page 2
February 14, 1985
1
2. On site sanitary disposal vs. hook-up to village sewer
(assuming no discharge of toxic wastes)
If the Department had its choice, we would prefer to see the project
connected to the village sewer system. If this were accomplished, the
project could be developed based on the zoning then in place, and the
density requirements of Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code
would not be applicable. If on the other hand the village sewers were
not available, then Article 6 would limit the residential development
to two homes per acre and the commercial portion would be limited to !
a sewage flow not to exceed 600 gallons/acre. As long as the residential
i
and commercial densities are not exceeded, clustering would be allowable
to preserve some open space or buffer zones. t
3. Impact on aquifer, taking into account present status of adjacent village
wells, and their present nitrate problems.
Any development of the parcel will have some impact on the aquifer. i
If village sewers are installed then all waste waters will be discharged
through the system to Long Island Sound. Since the Moore's Lane well
field is not one of the major sources of the village water supply, even
the connection to the village sewers should not lower the water table r
in the area.
If on site sanitary disposal systems are installed, these discharges would
in effect augment the groundwater in the area since most times the village
water supply utilizes the East Marion or Southold well fields. Nitrates
are not now a problem at the Moore's Lane well field and if the allowable
densities of Article 6 are adhered to, the amount of nitrates discharged
to the groundwater will be minimized.
4. Comments, Recommendations, etc. on other applicable items.
Prior to any approval of a subdivision, either residential, commercial or 114�
some mix, covenants would have to We executed that would place restrictions f
on the use or storage of toxic and hazardous materials.
The Lead Agent, be if Southold Town or Greenport Village, will most likely
require an Environmental Impact Statement and as an involved agency we will
have to respond to Health related and environmental issues. Our position
should be basically as set forth, therefore, your ultimate design should
reflect these concerns.
We hope the above clarifies some of the issues you raised. If you have
other areas of concern, please forward them to us and we will respond.
Very truly yours,
u
i
Robert A. Villa, P.E. i
RAV/Js Chief Engineer
APPENDIX NO. 13
xr
INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
TRIP GENERATION DATA
A - 13
200---Residential
his section summarizes trip generation for all As expected, the*single-family detached unit I
ypesof residential dwellings.Eachcategory of has the highest generation rate per unit of all
esidential housing,particularly single-family residential uses. This is followed by apart-
ments, with retirement communities having
tetached housing and apartments, used data the lowest rate.The rate for planned unit de-
rom a wide range of units with varying sizes, velo ments,which has a mix of single-family,
rice ranges, locations and ages. Con- detached units and apartments, is in between
.equently,there could be as wide a variation in i
rips generated within each category as there is these two types. Single-family detached units
Between different categories. As expected, have the highest rate hecause: 1)They are the
lwelling units that were larger in size, more largest units in sir.• ��•� i ii:�ve more people and
�
more vehicles per unit than any other types;2)
:xpensive or farther away from the central they are generally located farther away from i
.)usiness districts had a higher trip generation shopping centers,employment areas and other I
-ate per unit than those smaller in size,less ex- pp g
a�ractors than are other types; and 3) they
pensive or closer to the CBD. However, other j i■
actors such as geographic location in the have fewer alternate modes available because f .®
:ountry and type of adjacent and nearby de- they are not as concentrated as other types of
ielopment also
had an effect on the generation units. I
-ate. Thus, only the above general statement
Lead of some linear relationship)concern-
I►b size,cost and location of dwelling unit and �{{
.he income of the occupant could be made. I
i
�a
s
Summary of Rate Tables of the Different Types of Dwelling Units.
.,.1,[Dwelling Unit Average Weekday Vehicle
Trip Ends per Unit
Average Maximum Minimum
210 Single-Family Detached Unit 10.0 21.9 4.3 i
6.1 123 0.5
220 Apartment, General 5 4 SS .7
7
4
221 Low-Rise Apartment 3.7 5.4
222 High-Rise Apartment
1.2
230 Condominium 5.1 9.4 0.6
240 Mobile Home 5.4 6.8 2.8
250 Retirement Community 3.3 4.9 2.8
270 Planned Unit Development 7.9 10.0 62
R".117f
APPENDIX NO. 14
r
AUTHORIZATION BY THE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
TO PREPARE WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 26 , 1986
A - 14
t_1 ZL
Opcef'S UTILITY OFFICE TEL.
11ill �• (516)477-1748
MAYOR age or reeport
POWER PLANT TEL.
GEORGE W.HUBBARD I«co11ro11AT90 loan
"cW INco�ro�AT�ow ArQ,L i.uu (516)477-0172
TRUSTEES .1-.. AroAAT:OM uwote OCMCOAL LAW MAT u. *904
JEANNE M.COOPER
GAIL F.HORTON —
DAVID E.KAPELL ••
WILLIAM H.LIEBLEIN �/ _
p N G I S L A 1'4
O
E�
SUPT.OF UT TUTEES
JAMES 1.MONSELL �.`r..a w•
236 THIRD STRLET
GREENPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY
NEW YORK 11944
September 25, 1986
Mr. John Costello
Wiggins Lane
Greenport, N. Y. 11944
Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Moore's
Lane, Greenport
Dear Mr. Costello,
On May 28, 1986 the Utility Committee recommended that
the Village of Greenport enter into a sewer and water agreement
with you, so that you can proceed with your plans before the Town
of Southold.
On June 18, 1986 the Village Board of Trustees author-
ized the Village Attorney to prepare the water and sewer agree-
ments. These agreements are being prepared.
If I can be of further service, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
i
James 1 . Monsell
Superintendent of Public Utilities
JIM: Ikm
CC: George Hubbard, Mayor
All Village Trustees
Utility Committee
Village Attorney
Sam McLendon, H2M
Southold Town Board
Southold Planning Board
APPENDIX N0. 15
e
TEST WELL DATA
A - 15
HOLZMACHER,MCLENDON i MURRELL.P.C.
TABLE 1
COSTELLO TEST WELL
TNS'. V T T,i.A(-,r. nF C:PT:RNP0RT
WATER QUALITY RESULTS
Sample Time Period
Parameter 30 Min. 3 Hrs. 6 Hrs. 24 Hrs .
Iron 0.04 0.05 0. 04 0. 04
Manganese <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 2 <0. 02
Chloride 7 .0 7 . 0 10.0 11. 0
Complete Water Quality Survey (Based on 6 Hr. Sample)
Parameter Result
Aldicarb < 2.
Nitrate 0.5
Nitrite < 0.1
Ammonia < 0.2
pH 6. 2
Spec. Cond. 160.
Calcium 10. 8
Magnesium 4.5
Hardness 45.5
Sodium 6.5
Turbidity < 1.00
Total Solids 110.
Color < 5. 00
Results for Pesticides Analysis
Compound u9/1 -
lindane < 0. 03
heptachlor < 0. 03.
aldrin < 0. 03
heptachlor epoxide < 0. 03
dieldrin < 0. 04
endrin < 0. 06
'
00,P' -DDT < 0. 07
p,p'-DDT < 0 . 09
methoxychlor < 1 . 0
toxaphene < 2 . 5
chlordane < 0 . 5
ALL RESULTS REPORTED MEET NEW YORK STATE DRINKING WATER LIMITS .
"'EI
CV EST LABORATORIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
377 SHEFFIELD AVE. 0 N. BABYLON, N.Y. 11703 • (516) 422.5777
LAB NO. C860796/14 05/06/86
Mr. John W Hallman
PO Box 423
Shelter Island Heights NY 11965
ATTNS
SOURCE OF SAMPLES Costello-Greenport
COLLECTED BYs Client DATE COL'D:04/21/86 RECEIVED:04/22/86
SAMPLES Water sample-24 hour
ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS
Iron as Fe mg/L <0.05
Manganese as Mn mg/L <0.02
Free CO'2 mg/L 13
Ammonia as N mg/L <0.05
Nitrite as N mg/L <0.002
MBAS as LAS mg/L <0. 1
PH units 6.3
Nitrate as N mg/L 1.6
Chloride as Cl mg/L 14
Hardness as CaCO3 mg/L 52
Alkalinity tot CaCo3 mg/L 12
Tot Dissolved Solids mg/L 110
Spec. Cond. umho/cm mg/L 200
Sodium as Na mg/L 8.5
cc:
REMARKSS All values are within NY State and Federal limits
for potabe water.
DIR Tu`R__ ( k- a-!p- ---------
rnm 2283
'&CO/EST LABORATORIES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
377 SHEFFIELD AVE. • N. BABYLON, N.Y. 11703 • (516) 422-5777
LAB NO. CB60796/15 05/06/86
Mr. John W Hallman
PO Box 423
Shelter Island Heights NY 11965
ATTNI
SOURCE OF SAMPLE: Costello-Greenport
COLLECTED BYE Client DATE COL' D=04/21/86 RECEIVED:04/22/86
SAMPLED Wafer sample-4A hour
ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS
Iron as Fe mg/L <0.05
Manganese as Mn mg/L <0.02
Free CO2 mg/L 17
Ammonia as N mg/L <0.05
Nitrite as N mg/L <0. 002
MEAS as LAS mg/L <0. 1
PH units 6.3
Nitrate as N mg/L 2. 1
Chloride as Cl mg/L 32
lardness as CaCO3 mg/L 60
"lkalinity tot CaCo3 mg/L 16
Tot Dissolved Solids mg/L 130
Spec. Cond. umho/cm mg/L 230
Sodium as Na mg/L 7. 5
cc:
REMARKS: All values are within NY State and Federal limits
for potabe water.
D I R R-- - - -- -- ----t-
rn= 2284
i
'a•lp wnTpos
peao72ase2 Aleas2spw a so esoga Aq 6QTgul2p 207 peon •g ao"
PTf @ —TP— 70 add 0[! w-P sew bululta900 20a0N •saslp
tempos psaol23se2 Ale2•Ass vo esoy7 Aq bulxuT2p 2o7 peon
eq aoe pin046 anlpw 7o add O1 wYa e2w buT0lt3000 2ea9M •.
-odd S, peso:• Um pinog• seoveaegns ga0q 7o 0ola92auso
-e0o ltaoa ftp 0aoess2d gaoq s2s sswsbuw pus awl 32 •
S W72
OSL ••a•JTns
i •• •%TWTT p•asu6Ts•p WI wnTpo4
• (' sssut6usw
! • [' 0021
0'T 2sddoa
�! OS1 •PT2Om
�. T•As7 4u—T• !3uco •r—T=*N •Ttolsaq, plus 2oul
P
—w%P—OTgaTp—v
1 •OOga•��g1P020TYJ
gdd OOT poem a0o ( x20700028
I TTsge m0lae2ausovoo Tvaoa *nL ( silo 020
i
7 M
g TO-n awuTataeap onrlaw •TOoTM•go OTO• 20
SO' 2•ATTS
�• TO' snTu•Tog
'OT •a•2aTN
L00' Aim=s"
SO' pts?
1'1 7 •PT20"T1
SO' nnTro2to
T 0' sin l wPra
'i onT2•f
SO' ZTu•s2Y
ssT:sN ltoT=•g, OTat 20"1
SONVONW&S VlLYN ONINXIVO UV.L5 WHOA M1N
T - III 7i*Yl
t
i
I
i �
APPENDIX NO. 16
DOCUMENTATION REGARDING SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION
A - 16
0uzn1w?zt (Pu.ffle cSe�ioo��,
GREENPORT UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944
516-477-1950
CARL J. NELSON Ed. D
Superintendent of Schools
April 22, 1987
Mr. Merle Wiggin, President
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley - P.O. Box 672
Greenport, New York 11944
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
As per your request, I am pleased to provide you with the following in-
formation:
1. Expense per pupil 1986-87 - $5,611 - according to the New
York State Education Conference Board printed and dated
February 1987
2. Enrollment for 1970-71 through 1986-87 - see attachment #2
3. Enrollment for 1986-87 and projections for 1987-88 -
see attachment #3
4. Taxable Assessed Valuations for School Purposes - $12,784,476 -
see attachment #4
Should you need additional information or further assistance, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Cordially,
/C/arJ. elson
Sndent of Schools
CJN/maw
Enclosures
GREENPORT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Greenport, New York
ENROLLMENT FIGURES
YEAR PUPIL ENROLLMENT
1970 - 71 936
1971 - 72 896
1972 - 73 867
1973 - 74 856
1974 - 75 871
1975 - 76 896
r
1976 - 77 881
1977 - 78 849
1978 - 79 817
1979 - 80 783
1980 - 81 715
1981 - 82 687
1982 - 83 670
1983 - 84 660
1984 - 85 621
1985 - 86 610
1986 - 87 573
GREENPORT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Greenport, New York
ENROLLMENT (as of September 1986) PROJECTED ENROLLMENT (for September 1987)
Kindergarten 35 Kindergarten 35
Grade 1 40 Grade 1 35
Grade 2 34 Grade 2 40
Grade 3 47 Grade 3 34
Grade 4 41 Grade 4 47
Grade 5 28 Grade 5 41
Grade 6 37 Grade 6 28
Grade 7 58 Grade 7 55
Grade 8 46 Grade 8 58
Grade 9 32 Grade 9 46
Grade 10 49 Grade 10 32
Grade 1.1 42 Grade 11 49
Grade 12 44 Grade 12 42
Special Education 30 Special Education 30
Combined Programs Combined Programs
BOCES Special 10 BOCES Special 10
Education Education
573 582
� 3
' i- sbL;�• _ - 'r� PERTXrT�IX?ofiggg
L'EYY` -- -
1TF3EH�-6AT-COPY OF THIS.REPO.RT 0 _R� L _ AFF C '� E9S PT OLI:ER+lIUdEAU OF. UNICIPAL RESEARCH AND
i1STICS,.DIVISION .F'MtiNICIeAt AFF1#'
-.� : i ♦`c_a.:.T;_?•F'•'_sW''`Zj. � �;•j jG."C�-` 2:�yi�'.��y•'r5.t,._'T'-'• -
'+R
ANE.OF DISTRICT RTi9l-. �t ' sx�"►'••._.. _- :.cd> :��- .•r -
WE
Vr-CIIrE� 9ZAVTS ::t:�:=`'�: ,'•9ZI�TLS =F-, ;9ZAVTRS" 92AGEEX ^92lIdP. 4ZEOSIS
HFtlF-CTTY-r`�IDTfN�iTFI"-`TA @L ,.A,. ,ES 0' ; •.y TE4_•=y�AGED * TAX -LEVY FOR ♦'FOR AUDIT Atl CONTR:
R.TOWNe<YALUATi iti t. +n
^-1 -Z's „f SESSEO:t SS SS S RICT.,_.`'•.>k -"n s ,a: '�
y w.r -�- •Y ►kms
k •= - ?: ;r $.` a�J' tea'?_ =_: t:F����!s'•r f4:jt ENTER TOTKL''ayLY. < ,= -
Y: •:pct =:yc'c .. -`- 'S'"•:, icy: `a...,-
•~ -+: i` _ - k• r�;;� t... ;,�,_„� ��3 - - _ >xxxxxxxrxxxxxxx•.•.-.�` .�� - --���
IMUL
42
000. `- �:�.; :f:•,_ z
' - - - `�+�:Cti.� sti--ri,�� ��'`y%A!v=�. •a _ tiq�f�,._'M-f: .. _, �;;_ a: :��i�
w.
1:111,111F 111111 111
_ `:~ - `'.•T-''�}•:-r.�1Y.: �"+ia.i^.T.i S.» .ct:.Y?3 c� _ a - .':'s• -`. �” :..-���'r!:'
", `t!T.t..�^c_fiy�ryt'�; �, ;�(,(.:� ,r:_.,�^. ..-,i-�r�?.,, ri�','_F..t�•'Fa�:{�"iv Si!.w�G',i3•li:�aT...•.�`,IV;-
'�._ __ �'.:','o' '.taYtc- ,•T.,j•,�'t��i 7di�Il '!� b:• T-Z•L -OCE- '=`�"-t"!R,.��;�.�- _ -
• .. - "4:'- '"moi:��:x'e','"�:._ .r:- :/ _ �•Tr
r w.' •
NAME OF ANY LIBRARY TO WHICH TAXES WERE CONTRIBUTED ..........+ I;............... — _
D / ,
.--TF Ti+cR"c'�AS AN AUTHOnIZ7CTI0Y'FGn•EXEIIPTIOIYS �R E AGED, WHA71NC0.'1EI�VEMASADO IED :�:�.....
IF TAXES ARE COLLECTED IN INSTALLMENTS, PLEASE STATE THE DATES WHEN OJ"c. 4'" "�'=,r,`
E OF TAY. WR.RRAi:T TAX WARRANT—IS FOR'::...DAYS. DAT: T.'.1( WLRRLVT EXPIRES ...:....
ATE lt'�`���.. SIGNATURE OF. TRUSTEE ORCLERK. 87ARD OF EWCATION .r _
4 E FOk DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS- THREE COPIES ARE BEING SENT TO YOU FOR EACH OF_Y UR SCHOOL GIST-PICTS. PLEASE F9RK,RO TNESE_IO _
R-BOIRDS OF EOUCXI ID7J aH�ZRUSTEES�ITA�NITAU TION-(0-Fll OUT THE INFORMATION CALLED FOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TAX WIRRA':T
• `•Grit -IT_ Tvn urloi[( To-t- rc rnoVAoncl. Tn Y—i
Lr
APPENDIX NO . 17
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
SKETCH PLAN APPROVAL
CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING
A - 17
SUPPLEMENT TO
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
RELATING TO
THE CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT AND THE MOORESLAND TOWN
HOUSES PROJECT, LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY,
NEW YORK, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE VIII OF THE EN-
VIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW: PART 617 OF TITLE 6 OF THE NEW YORK
STATE CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND CHAPTER 44 OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN CODE.
LOCATION: 48.718 acres located within the Town of Southold
at the southeast corner of the intersection of Moore's
Lane and Middle Road (County Road 48)
APPLICANT: John A. Costello and Diane Carrol
206 Wiggins Lane and
Greenport, New York 11944 Donald Bracken
(516) 477-1393 30 Wheeler Road
Old Field,NY 11733
(516) 751-8711
LEAD AGENCY: Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1938
PREPARER: Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, New York 11944
(516)477-0030
DATE OF PREPARATION: April 1987
SUPPLEMENT PREPARATION: June 25 , 1987
SUPPLEMENT TO DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
THE CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
AND
THE MOORESLAND TOWN HOUSES PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
SECTION A - GROUNDWATER IMPACT (NITRATES)
SECTION B - DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
SECTION C - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC STUDY
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944
Telephone: (5 16) 477-0030
ASSOCIATES June 25 , 1987
Fairweather/Brown
Architects
Gannet Fleming Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman
h)tgineers Southold Town Planning Board
R P Monow & Associates Southold Town Hall
Winery Design Main Road
111amici. last Southold , L. I .
hn i-tr.�►t►t a tut Planinnif New York - 11971
Wilhrinn Atlantis CO
Hinun�iut PlanningR e : DEIS C e d d r f 1 e 1 d S/
Mooresland
Dear Mr. Orlowski :
In accordance with your letter of June 9, 1987 and
comments from Szepatowski Associates dated May 21 ,
1987 , attached please find a Supplement to subject
DEIS.
The Supplement addresses the following items as
requested :
1 . Groundwater Impact : The location of the
proposed well was shown on the Site Plan
contained as Appendix 5 in the submitted
DEIS. For further reference, the well site
is located between lots number 22 and 23 in
the Affordable Housing section .
The projected impact to the groundwater from
lawn fertilization is contained as Supplement
identified "Groundwater Impact" . These
calculations are based on the modeling
accomplished by Cornell University , entitled
" Land Use and Ground Water Quality in the
Pine Barrens of Southampton" , as provided by
David Emilita as a guide in the preparation
for these calculations .
As stated in the DEIS, we feel that this
modeling should not eliminate the requirement
of a continuing monitoring of groundwater
quality , both in the new well and the
strategically placed monitoring wells .
Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr.
June 25 , 1987
Page 2
As approvals are already being obtained from the
Village to hook up to both the public water and
sanitary systems , and as the proposed density requires
both public water and sewer, the review of the
alternatives without public water and sewer as
suggested in the 11 /25/85 letter from Szepatowski
Associates would not be applicable. In other words , if
the availability of public water and public sewer were
withdrawn , then this would require a totally new
project submittal .
2 . Drainage : The drainage calculations contained on the
Site Plan submittal have been extracted and are included
as a Supplement to the DEIS. Please note that drainage
swales have been used as a primary means of effecting
recharge of storm run-off .
3 . Traffic : A complete peak hour traffic study has been
accompTished and is attached as a Supplement to the
DEIS.
You will note that the study indicates that the local
roadway network can readily accommodate the traffic
that will be generated by the proposed development .
Sincerely ,
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
i J,i ,
i -
Merlon E. Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E.
President
MEW/ iw
cc : Mrs . Diane Carroll
Mr . Donald Bracken
P D
I'
LD
S 1, � Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
June 9, 1987
Mr. Merlon Wiggin
President
Peconic Associates
One Bootleg Alley
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
Please let this confirm the following action taken by
the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, June 1, 1987.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept
and request compliance with the memorandum of the Planning
Consultan, David Emilita, dated May 21, 1987, with regard
to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Cedar-
field's and Mooresland proposals located at Greenport.
Enclosed is a copy of the memorandum for your review.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to
contact our office.
i
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc .
S41
SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
S41
TO: Southold Planning Board
RE: DEIS Cedar Fields/Mooreslands
FROM: Szepatowski Associates, Inc./David Emilita
DATE: May 21, 1987
We have reviewed the above referenced DEIS for sufficiency and
completeness and find it inadequate for public review since
several important and pertinent items are not shown on the
attached site plan nor discussed in the text in enough detail to
fully assess the impacts stated.
The following areas need to be more fully addressed before the
DEIS can be rendered complete and sufficient for review:
GROUNDWATER IMPACT - No documented assessment was made on
groundwater impact. No impact on the "on-site" well was stated.
The well is not even located on the site plan. No qualitative
analysis was shown as to nitrate levels in the on-site recharge
and its effect on the supply well.
Reference was made on the Scoping Checklist to our memo of
11/25/85, but no text discussion was devoted to the points raised
in that memo.
DRAAINAGE - No drainage calculation or drainage designs were
presented to substantiate the assessment of no significant
drainage impact.
TRAFFIC - No peak hour traffic analysis was shown. Simply
refering to AADT residual capacity is not sufficient. Key
intersection analysis is necessary at Moore' s Lane at Routes 48
and 25 and Middletown Road and Route 48.
It is recommended that a Suvol� ement to the DEIS be prepared and
submitted, addressing the points raised above. The Supplement
will then be assessed for completeness before public comment.
23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown. RI 02835 (401) 423-0430
SECTION A
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
( NITRATES)
I
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
FROM FERTILIZER NITRATES
FOR
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
PREPARED BY:
CHARLES R VELZY ASSOCIATES, INC.
ONE OLD COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 430
CARLE PLACE, NEW YORK 11514
JUNE 23, 1987
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
To access the impacts of fertilizer nitrates on groundwater
quality in the on-site well , estimates of the well ' s re-
charge zone and nitrate concentrations in recharge waters
are presented . Reference is made to reports previously
prepared as part of the area ' s water resource management
program.
The recharge zone for a production well is represented by a
circular area with the well at the center. The charge zone
(or capture zone ) of the on-site well can be estimated by
the method of Todd ( 1964) , as presented in the North Fork
Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York ( ERM/Camp ,
Dresser & McKee , 1983) . The method allows for the
estimation of the radius of influence of a pumping well ,
based on the expected pumping rate and natural recharge
rates from precipitation :
Q = 02 x w
where , Q = effective well pumping rate
r = radius of influence
0
w = natural recharge rate
The estimated production capacity of the on-site well is
120 ,000 gallons per day (gpd ) . Using an annual , long-term
average recharge value of 20 inches ( ERM/Camp , Dresser &
McKee , 1983 ) , the radius of influence is tabulated as :
o
W
o = 120 ,000 al/da
V 3 .75 x 10-4 gal/day/square foof
r = 1 . 79 x 103 ft 1800 feet
0
The radius of influence (ro ) defines the circular area
around the well from which infiltrating precipitation is
captured and discharged to the surface. A value of 1800
feet corresponds to an area of about 10 , 179 , 000 square feet ,
or 234 acres .
Based on this analysis , the proposed development is found to
be entirely within the recharge zone of the well . The
impact of nitrate fertilization of turfgrass in the
development can be assessed by determining what affect
development of 50 of these acres , or 21% of the recharge
area , would have on existing nitrate concentrations .
Nitrate concentrations ( Nitrate as Nitrogen ) in the well ' s
recharge water zone have been measured previously as 2 . 1
mg/L, as indicated in a letter from ECOTEST Laboratories ,
dated May 5 , 1986 , attached hereto.
The average effect of lawn fertilizers , using data
reflecting average turf management practices in Eastern
Suffolk County follows :
Nitrogen and Overall Nitrogen
Water Recharged From Concentration in
Substance Turf Other Recharge (mg/L)
Water ( in . ) 13 .5 18.2
Nitrogen ( lb/Acre ) 24 .0 4.2' 3 .94
Land use is based on residential with 2 to 4 dwelling units
per acre . Average turf management practices would estimate
the application rate of 2 . 5 pounds of fertilizer per 1 ,000
square feet per year ( Hughes and Porter, 1983 ) .
Resultant nitrate concentrations in pumped groundwater would
be expected to represent an average of the two concentrations
discussed above , and can be calculated from the equation :
(new
ercent of itrat percent o nitrat otal Water esultant
ater from concen- water from concen- volume- 100% nitrate
devel - tration remaining tration concentra-
pment recharge tion
area
( 21%) ( 3 . 94 mg/L) + ( 79%) (2, 1 mg/L) _ ( 100%) 1 esultant nitrate
concentration
Resultant Nitrate Concentration = 2 .49 mg/L
I
Based on a review of existing data , the impact of the
application of nitrate fertilizers would not result in
nitrate concentrations in excess of accepted water quality
criteria . A value of 2 .49 mg/L represents an average value.
Concentrations below this would be expected as a result of
the proposed fertilization monitoring program recommending an
application rate of one pound of fertilizer per one thousand
square feet . As previously stated , continuing monitoring of
the water quality from the new well and that of strategically
placed monitoring wells will be the best indication of the
effectiveness of the proposed fertilizing covenented
restrictions .
REFERENCES
Hughes , Henry B. F. and Keith Porter , Land Use and Ground
Water Quality in the Pine Barrons of Southampton , Corn-e 1
University , 1983.
North Fork Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York ,
M-Northeast/Camp , Dresser & McKee , 1983.
1
SECTION B
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (CEDARFIELDS)
LAND AREA: 8370 S. F. PER LOT (AVERAGE) .
PAVED AREAS (STREET AND DRIVE) : 1600 S. F. PER LOT.
DRAINAGE VOLUME:
LAND - - - 8370 X . 24 X . 1 = 200 CU . FT.
PAVEMENT - 1600 X . 24 X . 9 = 345 CU . FT.
TOTAL = 545 CU . FT.
DRAINAGE SWALE PER LOT:
60 ' X 3' X 2 ' = 480 CU . FT.
ADDITIONAL ROAD DRAINAGE (S. F. X . 17 X . 9/68)
STA. S. F. V. F. OF 10 ' DIA. LPs EACH SIDE
0+25 6580 14 2 - 10 X 8
4+70 4970 11 3 - 10 X 8
12+80 7280 16 3 - 10 X 8
22+05 8050 16 2 - 10 X 10
26+60 7000 15 2 - 10 X 8
33+50 11900 26 4 - 10 X 8
i
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (MOORESLAND)
BUFFER AREA - DRAINAGE VOLUME :
LAND - - - 159 , 550 X . 24 X . 1 = 1 , 130 CU . FT.
PAVEMENT - 30 , 450 X . 24 X . 9 = 6 ,580 CU . FT.
-------------
TOTAL = 7 ,710 CU . FT.
DRAINAGE SWALE - BUFFER SIDE OF ROAD:
3 , 200 X 1 ' X 2 . 5 = 8 , 000 CU . FT
TOWNHOUSE AREA - DRAINAGE VOLUME :
1
LAND - - - 484 , 400 X . 24 X . 1 = 11 , 630 CU . FT.
PAVEMENT - 55 , 000 X . 24 X . 9 = 11 , 880 CU . FT.
--------------
TOTAL = 23 , 510 CU . FT
DRAINAGE SWALE - TOWNSHOUSES (SIDE OF ROAD) :
4 , 200 X 3 ' X 2 ' = 25 ,200 CU . FT
ADDITIONAL ROAD DRAINAGE (S . F . X . 17 X . 9/68)
10 ' DIAMETER LEACHING POOLS LOCATED IN LOW AREAS
AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN.
NOTE : ALL ADDITIONAL ROAD DRAINAGE CATCH
BASINS TO BE LOCATED AT LOW POINTS IN
DRAINAGE SWALE . ACTUAL LOCATIONS TO BE
REVISED TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS.
SECTION C
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC STUDY
Louis K. McLean Associates, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
437 South Cinlnlrq Road • Brookhaven • New York • 11719
(516) 286-8668
LOl Illi K. McL111N, P E., LI).
GEORGE J. KAIGH, P E., LS.
JOHN 1.JOHNSEN,P.E.
June 23, 1987
Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin, Ph.D. , M.E.
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley
P.O. Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland
Development Traffic Study
LKMA Project No. 100-40-01
Dear Mr. Wiggin:
We are pleased to submit herewith the traffic study we
prepared in response to questions raised by the Planning Board of
the Town of Southold.
Our study indicates that the local roadway network can
readily accommodate the traffic that will be generated by the
proposed developments.
If you have any questions or if we can be of additional
assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Eugene F. Daly, P.E.
EFD/dy
enc.
CEDARFIELDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
MOORESLAND TOWN HOUSES PROJECT
DEIS TRAFFIC SUPPLEMENT
INTRODUCTION
This supplement has been prepared in response to comments
raised in the May 21, 1987, memorandum by David Emilita of
Szepatowski Associates, to the Southold Planning Board. This
report provides traffic analysis of the proposed developments and
their impact on the surrounding roadway network during the peak
morning and evening commuter hours and for peak hour conditions on
a Saturday. As suggested in the above referenced memorandum, the
following key intersections were evaluated:
1. Moores Lane at Route 48
2. Moores Lane at Route 25
3 . Middletown Road and Route 48
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed development consists of 84 affordable dwelling
units known as the Cedarfields project and 84 town houses known as
the Mooresland project. The proposed project is to be situated on
a 48 + acre site on the southeast corner of Moores Lane and County
Route 48 in the Town of Southold. A location map (See Figure 1)
is provided for reference.
As noted in the proposed site plan prepared by Charles E.
Egosi dated November 24, 1986, and furnished with the April 1987
DEIS, access to the Mooresland project would be provided solely on
Moores Lane while access to the Cedarfields project would be
provided on both Middletown Road and Moores Lane.
1
PROJECT LOCATION
el"1'. /al/NO
IH., 'it ,�• 1. ti.:{?4 �'9. -:c •1:.. "/n' V
-i; =' �!„,••, ,!. 4.>�. oma» STIRLING fW A
k:�.� •jnZe1:.P�. s Liar
46
CO NEMNE o s %� NG
IV
60
V M
•
2v o
fpr w s
"FAR" I -� ca�B11► 0 2S O-
` all'
• �� BROAD'''--''S��T �9e e •
NDgTM � � V `�►
... T:» 11TH Ts� • r
• 1' E ST aIIM M
w 02
Cm
�a1Y� CENTER ST RRRRWOLY
SDY H MT ��
--, a »T� 0- . GREENPORT
MA � -F .
0 . "IGGAS# 23
sT
1 OV •
e1w
FIGURE No. 1
Cedarfields - Mooresland
Project
N
Location Map
a
�o0 3.oc�o' 15000 LOUIS K. MCLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Consorting Engineers
437 South Country Road
C I'Ooc I BROOKHAVEN.NEW YORK 11719
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
Within the environs of the proposed site, County Route 48 is
a two lane concrete highway with asphalt shoulders. Moores Lane
is a two lane asphalt highway which serves as a truck route
connecting Routes 25 and 48. State Route 25 is a two lane
AV,#r�V r,Vir✓ 'QS~.V4-r loy"Jgy-
highwayA with shoulders. Middletown Road is a local residential
street situated to the immediate east of the Cedarfields project.
Right-of-way control at the three key intersections is as
follows:
1. Moores Lane and Route 48 - stop sign on the southeast
corner controlling northbound traffic.
2. Moores Lane and Route 25 - yield sign on the northwest
corner controlling southbound traffic.
3. Middletown Road and Route 48 - stop sign on the
southeast corner controlling northbound traffic; stop
sign on the northwest corner controlling southbound
traffic on McCann Avenue.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
To assess the impact the proposed development will have on
the adjacent roadway network, it is necessary to initially
establish existing or baseline conditions. To supplement the
automatic machine counts previously described on page 34 of the
DEIS, turning movement counts were conducted at the three key
intersections during the following hours:
Friday - p.m. peak commuter hour
Saturday - afternoon peak hour
Monday - a.m. peak commuter hour
2
These hours were chosen so that the "worst case" scenario
could be evaluated - that is, those hours during which existing
traffic volumes are highest and the traffic attributable to the
proposed developments are heaviest. The results of the turning
movement counts are provided in the Appendix as well as automatic
machine counts in the area that were obtained from the New York
State Department of Transportation and the Suffolk County
Department of Public Works.
TRIP GENERATION
Trip generation rates from Institute of Transportation
Engineer's "ITE Trip Generation Manual" were used in this study
since they reflect typical conditions on Long Island for the
various types of residential development being proposed. These
rates are shown in Table 1. It should be recognized that the
rates for the Cedarfields Affordable Housing project are in our
opinion quite conservative (on the high side) because of the small
size of the units - 850 square feet. Note the generation rates
for the Mooresland Town Houses are approximately half the rates
for the affordable housing project and the town houses are
approximately 50% larger (1250 square feet per unit) .
3
TABLE 1
CEDARFIELDS/MOORESLAND PROJECT
TRIP GENERATION RATES
CEDARFIELDS MOORESLAND
(84 AFFORDABLE (84 TOWN HOUSE
HOUSING UNITS) UNITS) COMBINED
RATE TOTAL TRIPS RATE TOTAL TRIPS PROJECTS
Average Daily 10 840 5.2 437 1277
Peak AM Highway
` Hour
J Enter 0.21 18 0.07 6 24
Exit 0.55 46 0.37 32 78
Total 0.76 64 0.44 38 102
Peak PM Highway
Hour
Enter 0.63 53 0.37 32 85
Exit 0.37 31 0.18 15 46
Total 1.00 84 0.55 47 131
Saturday Peak
Hour
Enter 0.51 43 0.26 22 65
Exit 0.45 38 0.22 19 57
Total 0.96 81 0.48 41 122
4
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
The distribution and assignment of traffic attributed to the
proposed development was estimated based on the following
conditions:
o location of employment and population centers and
shopping areas.
o the regional highway network within the environs of the
site.
o the local roadway network serving the site.
o turning movement activity at the key study
intersections.
Figure 2 shows the projected traffic distribution for the
weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours while Figure 3 shows the
estimated distribution for the Saturday afternon peak hour.
The projected traffic assignments for site generated traffic
for these time periods are shown on the turning movement counts
provided in the Appendix.
CAPACITY ANALYSES
Capacity analyses were performed at the three key study
intersections for the three key time periods previously identified
using the new Highway Capacity Manual, "Transportation Research
Board Special Report 209, 1985".
The analyses were initially done for existing or baseline
conditions (No Build) . Next, the traffic attributable to the
5
z
z
W
u z -
MIDDLE COUNTY ROAD RT 48
�0C25)� 1505 ocs)
5
35 15 w�co) CO)
ZZs)(5)
B I&T
UJ (0)
z c
a
.J Q
EDARfELD
Ift AVE.
f O Cao) \ \ �'�
} 0C30 aC25�--
Cal
O i5 z
icc 1 r It-
o I C(2-5l iu
I LE G E k-i D
Symbol. 084Ripnw"
Q
O -
MOY�MF.J�T =
2c(-' 3p .�`i ,o MOOREO LAI40
MAIN ROAD 20 PR Cu BOT
_
` 30 (20) % ES
GE kRPtLZ
Z��}--� ,,5'ytT 25 PRCUWT
F I G U R E 2
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC
WEEKDAY AM 8 PM PEAK
NOT TO SCALE
Z
Z
oc W
• V Z
MIDDLE COUNTY ROAD RT 48 I.JZO(15) --�t5) 0(15)
O 15)
r -
.ZO) C55) °C5j0 i 5)
B ST
5�x0)
`'o Co)
CD o�
r �-
W
Z O
J O
cc
EDALD
O�1 AVE.
O(zp)
z
ull
¢� W
� � o
Symbol, 024puPno"4.
Ic
0
MoY�MF�-+T =40,
Co) ya MooRE9 L.AI 40
MAIN ROAD Zo PRojz4rT
t-� 420)
� % CWARPIML.DS2000Gd)RT 25 PRctiJrff-c-T
F I G U R E 3
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC
SATURDAY AFTERNOON PEAK
NOT TO SCALE
proposed developments was superimposed on the baseline conditions
and this composite traffic volume analyzed.
The results of the analyses are provided in Table 2. Level
of Service criteria for unsignalized intersections are provided in
Table 3.
As shown in Table 2, the predominate level of service (LOS)
provided for both the build and the no build condition is level
"A". As noted by the double asterisk, there is a slight
degradation of the level of service for three traffic movements
when the no build condition is compared to the build condition.
These are summarized as follows: .
A. Saturday Afternoon Peak
1. At Route 48 and Middletown Road, the LOS for northbound
traffic changes from "A" to "B" with the reserve
capacity being reduced from 421 to 362 passenger cares
per hour (pcph) .
2. At Route 25 and Moore's Lane, the LOS for southbound
traffic changes from "B" to "C" with the reserve
capacity being reduced from 309 to 283 pcph.
B. Friday P.M. Peak
1. At Route 48 and Moore's Lane, the LOS for northbound
traffic changes from "A" to "B" with the reserve
capacity being reduced from 410 to 364 pcph.
As can be seen, these differences are very minor, and the
overall level of service provided is excellent. It should be
recognized that in the design of new intersections, that the
nationally recognized American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommends that level of service
"C" be used as the design criteria.
6
TABLE 2
CEDARFIELDS MOORESLAND PROJECT
Summary of Intersection Capacity
Analyses Level of Service
EXISTING WITH PROPOSED
CONDITION DEVELOPMENTS
INTERSECTION (NO BUILD) (BUILD)
MINOR ST. *MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. *MAJOR ST.
NB SB EB WB, NB SB EB WB,
Route 25 & Moores
Lane
AM Peak -- A A -- -- A A --
PM Peak -- B A -- -- B A --
Saturday Peak -- B A -- -- **C A --
Route 48 & Moores
Lane
AM Peak A -- -- A A -- -- A
PM Peak A -- -- A **B -- -- A
Saturday Peak B -- -- A B -- -- A
Route 48 &
Middletown Road
AM Peak A A A A A A A A
PM Peak B A A A B A A A
Saturday Peak A A A A **B A A A
* Indicates Level of Service for the left turn movement
** Indicates change in Level of Service
7
TABLE 3
LEVLE OF SERVICE CRITERIA
FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO
(PCPH) SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC
> 400 A Little or no delay
300-399 B Short traffic delays
200-299 C Average traffic delays
100-199 D Long traffic delays
0- 99 E Very long traffic delays
* F
* When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays
will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion
affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition
usually warrants improvement to the intersection.
8
i
CONCLUSIONS
Our study indicates that the traffic generated by the
proposed development can readily be absorbed by the adjoining
roadway network. In addition, the study is somewhat conservative
since the generation rates used for the Cedarfields project would
appear to be on the high side because of the small size of the
affordable dwelling units.
9
APPENDICES
NYSDOT & SCDPW
AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC COUNTS
NEW YORE; STATE ROUTE 25
DEFT OF TRANSPORTATION OAKLAWN AVENUE TO
AVERAGE WEEKDAY ROUTE 114
HOURLY REPORT JUNE 1984
1
AM WESTBOUND EASTBOUND FILE NAME
12-1 40 30 RT25 S05006,-
1-2 30 20
2-3 10 10
3-4 10 10
4-5 20 10
5-6 30 30
6-7 80 &1
} 7-8 180 150 DAIL{ TOTi
8-9 210 190 8, 1go
9-10 230 210
10-11 280 280 EST, ARD
11-12 280 " 300 7,400
FM
12-1 =00 310
1-� 290 310
--
330 300
.3-4 360 27C)
4-5 390 290
li-6 330 26i�
6-7 230 200
7-8 190 180
8-9 170 150
} 9-10 120 140 DENO !
1�,-1 1 110 100 PEAK HOOF.
11- 129:. 70 70
1 OTALS 4,290 3,900
1-01
3/04/85 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROUTE 25
COVERAGE COUNTS STATION HOURLY REPORT
PAGE 2
DC 07 STATION 050 ROUTE 25 MILEPOINT 0416593 LOCATION OAKLAWN AVE SOUTHOLD RT 114 GREENPORT TYPE 4 C
YR 84 MO JUNE WK-YR 27 FACTOR GROUP 40 BATCH NO. 457 REFERENCE MARKER POST 25 07041640 SECTION LENGTH -4.30
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO
DY D D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DIP DAY HI HI HR
MO W R AM PM TOTAL TOTAL HR COUNT
25 1 1 31 33 33 25 31 25 19 15 14 13 10 6
25 1 2 32 35 3G 38 31 23 19 17 12 10 6
26 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 3 9 17 20 18 26 31 31 28 28 25 29 27 20 18 15 15 10 7 3830 12 310
26 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 7 18 23 21 25 29 31 29 32 36 39 34 22 20 17 12 12 7 4250 9080 17 390
27 3 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 9 14 20 20 25 27 32 32 28 25 28 24 20 19 14 12 8 7 3750 13 320
27 3 2 5 3 1 0 1 3 8 15 19 22 26 26 28 25 34 36 42 31 23 18 16 12 9 7 4100 7850 17 420
28 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 7 14 19 20 26 31 31 32 29 '32 26 28 21 19 16 14 10 8 3930 14 320
28 4 2 4 2 1 1 2 3 8 19 19 23 28 30 31 30 32 34 35 37 25 19 17 13 11 9 4330 8260 18 370
29 5 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 8 16 17 26 33
29 5 2 4 3 2 1 1 3 7 19 22 24 33
A V E R A G E W E E K D A Y H 0 U R DIP DAY HI HIDAY HR
DIP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 , 11 12 TOTAL TOTAL HR HOUR
1 3 2 1 1 1 3 8 15 19 21 28 30 31 31 30 27 29 26 20 18 15 14 10 7 3900 310
2 4 3 1 1 2 3 8 18 21 23 28 28 30 29 33 36 39 33 23 19 17 12 11 7 4290 390
TOTAL 7 5 2 2 3 6 16 33 40 44 56 58 61 60 63 63 68 59 43 37 32 26 21 14 8190 680 17
DIP TOTAL COUNT FACTORED ADV HRS COUNTED DAYS COUNTED AVG Y. AVG DAY EST DESIGN HOUR EST AADT
HI HR
1 15140 3545 95 5 310 .079 617 7445
2 16460 3900 94 5 390 .090
TOTAL 31600 7445 189 10 680 .083
3
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS SITE NL: 480009 FILES 048-09
1 HOUR, 2 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT CR48 60OFW YOUNGS AV. CL
CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.00 WEEK OF MMONIAV AUGUST 26, 1985
IOUR MONDAY 26 TUESDAY 27 WEDNESDAY 28 THURSDAY 29 FRIDAY 23 SATURDAY 24 SUM8IAY 25 WEEKDAY AVERAGE
BEGINS E W E W E W E W E W E W E W E W
12AN 19 19 20 12 t t t t t t 69 64 68 65 20 16
1 11 8 6 6 t t t t t t 32 23 36 47 9 7
2 6 15 10 5 t t t t t t 28 16 19 34 8 10
3 8 3 6 6 t t t t • t 15 10 15 15 7 5
4 6 14 4 7 t t t t • t 13 13 14 10 5 11
5 46 45 32 33 t t t t t t 62 25 30 16 39 39
6 104 111 113 98 s t t t ' t t 127 54 86 34 109 105
7 249 224 2995 223 t + t + t t 201 124 97 70 272 224
8 261 248 294 238 t t t t t t 299 199 157 111 278 243
9 271 286 257 235 t t t t t t 389 269 168 186 264 261
10 283 310 t t t t t t t s 466 288 210 264 283 310
11 308 308 t t • t t t t t 493 310 218 354 308 306
12M 302 265 t t t t t t 411 286 500 336 277 371 357 276
1 317 300 t • t t t t 369 329 482 355 227 406 343 315
2 319 319 t t t • t • 372 353 424 361 291 378 346 336
3 300 320 t t t t t t 388 330 364 402 219 378 344 325
4 317 378 t t t• t t • 463 403 320 389 235 332 390 391
5 320 329 t t t t t t 389 330 324 378 175 359 355 330
6 230 209 t t t t t t 295 280 245 334 126 278 263 245
7 159 189 t t t t t t 291 204 229 2% 136 236 225 197
8 112 153 t t t t t t ! 306 161 181 246 122 191 209 157
9 84 125 t t t + • t 247 175 140 152 73 213 166 150
10 71 64 t t t t t t 191 139 151 163 64 95 131 102
11 47 47 t t t t t t 155 72 93 133 34 61 101 60
TOTALS 4150 4289 1037 863 0 0 0 0 3677 3062 5647 4904 3097 4504 4832 4423
44do3 x ,TZ= 3437 = 3 40D pAcrr EB
COMBINED TOTALS ��I-r x. 77= 3401 = BiAOD AAD-r WlB
12 38 32 t t t 133 133 36
1 19 12 t t t 55 83 16
2 21 15 t t t 44 53 18
3 11 12 t t t 25 30 12
4 20 11 26 24 16
5 91 65 t • t 87 46 78
6 215 211 t t t 181 120 214
7 473 518 t t t 325 167 496
8 509 532 t t t 498 268 521
9 557 492 t t t 658 354 525
10 593 t t t t 754 474 593
11 616 t t t t 803 572 616
12 567 t t t 697 838 648 633
1 617 t t t 698 837 633 658
2 638 t t t 725 785 669 682
3 620 t t t 718 766 597 669
4 695 t t t 866 709 567 781
5 649 t t t 719 702 534 685
6 439 t t t 575 579 404 508
7 348 * t t 495 467 372 422
8 265 t t t 467 427 313 366
9 209 t t t 422 292 286 316
10 135 t t • 330 314 159 233
11 94 t + t 227 226 95 161
TOTALS 8439 1900 0 0 6939 10551 7601 9255
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
_ I (�r7L ET��I �� _ �g "ON"ONLOCATION
DATE AM FEA!<
NORTH ARROW
I
� / I
1
141-71 �---® � !
zi
® G ►, PRo p 0SLD
0 ADDmONAL MOVEME NTS
ORtS4►ND C -DARP1"S
PROJeCT PROJECT
z 3
8 0 7
0 z
NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. tAcLEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
Eanswunt Engineers
437°jutn Lzimm nava
EROOKHAVEN.t+E\e IJ96 l:.:3
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION M I V PLETON F>, T DATE F'M_L'AK
NORTH ARROW t�
1
267
r—
I
'O
® c
0 � PR0 p 0SE+ D
r ' ADDmONAL MOVEME NTS
oRe9 LAND 08PARFIELO9
P RO JECT P ROJ ECT
O
c o �,
-- - - — 5
NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. tAcLEAN ASSGCIATES. P.C.
Constunnit Engineers
337 Ejutn C:antnr noxa
E?ROOKHAVEN.NEW N:iK 1!7.?
VE ICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
CAT
LOCATION_ ��UT E �8 M I DDL�ToN �� DATE PM E-AK
NORTH ARROW
1
,Z-75 !
G
P R o P o S ED
ADDITIONAL MOVE ME NTS
PoREIB LEWD. C@MRFI"S
ROJECT P RojECT
O 7
O !
NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
Consuu11 Enoneen
077°jut.Czuncry w0a0
{ EROOKMAVE!4.t:E%v 1,14K 11::3
I
r
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION t) L—L.N E r R-�r � Jr' DATE AM�PEAK,
NORTH ARROW
� � I
®� ,
� r
pR0p0SED
ADDITIONAL MOV E ME NTS
ORES LAWS CeP^RPIOWS
PROJECT PROJECT
71
z
s
C 7
D 3
NOTIES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. ?AcLEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
ConsutttnR En*neers
437 S3utn t::jntn•%oao
ER00KMAVE.N.NEW\ORK 1:::?
r VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION_ OORi- S ASIC— DATE PF1 M*<
NORTH ARROW
0
I
PROPOSED
^DDITIOMAL MOVeMENTS
12/
oRtSLAW12. r-0D^RFl"5
PKojr4T PROJ.tCT
A Co 5
3 3
C 5 5
D 10 __ ._
NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. MclEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
ConswbnR Engineers
137 9jum t:_untry cacao
EROOKMAVEN.NEW 1:RK 1:::3
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION_ ������ � --���� �� �5 DATE EM EE:AK
NORTH ARROW
rl
I
4
PROPOSED
ADDITIO14AL MOV e M E NTS
oRClaLAND G'Bq^RiFiAD6
P ROJGCT P ROJCCT
q
_ 9
NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSuCIATES. P.C.
ConswunR Enpneers
417£:um 1."-nt:V Wean
@ROOKHAVE!J.:.EW N:RA 1:::?
r
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION_ MCOP� LA N G� F""""T 4 DATE ) ,M FZEAK�
NORTH ARROW
2�00
PROPOSED
ADDITIONAL MOVF:ME NTS
oRCS1:AWD C-V-P^RFlF.LD3
PROJP�CT PROJECT
-A z s
B // 12-
c
c s z
O / �
I
DOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. ldcLEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
ConsumnR Engineers
337 Eaum um:n rioaa
BROOKHAVEN-NSVN-'RK1:::1
I
r
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION_ M001 S L-,4 � E �- -4g DATE Ell I
L-r F-': AIG
NORTH ARROW
1
rT
12J6
�.1
PRO P 4 S ED
ADDITIONAL MOV E M E NTS
8 C oRC.9 LAND- CSC^RF19L05
PROJGCT PROJPCT
it 13
1 1 8
n
3
' NOTES and COMMENTS
LOUIS K. MclEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
Cansuum[Engineers
137 4xan Ct_nvv Aoaa
BROOKHAVE"1.NEW).'3K 1..:3
1
VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
LOCATION DATE PM PF,L�K
NORTH ARROW
1
I
r--L-WI
L
Tt�v(9) . re�,r
FPROPOSED -1
ADDMO14AL MOVEMENTSj
oRCSLAWn, CWP^RFl"5 i
PROJPC'T PRO-Jr-CT
O 7101 (D i
z ,
v 7
NOTES and COMMENTS t
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
ConsumnR Enoneers
437 E-utn t.aanvv wo.o
E?ROOKMAVEN.1:EW QRK I:::?
CAPACITY ANALYSES
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
4iF9EiEiEiE�iF����1F9F��9t***�**siEiEjE�EiF9t9EdEdE�tiFit'1EiEiE�EiE9F�jfr�klEltltdF�k9F9GiFdE1E**9F1E�*9F*9E**9E�lE
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-VERHGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
'EAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . 1
EA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
1;-3ME OF THE EAST/WEST STREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 42
LAME OF THE NORTH/'SOUTH _.TRE=T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
JHME :F THE ANr;LY-5-ir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
ATE OF THE A;jA , IS k'mm/dd, %y ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •:5/22/67
-IME PE=IOD ANF»L'-(-ZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mon :gym peak No Build
-?%%TER-SZ TION . .'F= AND CONTr^,LI_ �
--------------------------------------------------------
:'i-ERSEC'TION T`i PE: T-Ir-.TEFcS=ION ,
r" JOR =TREE. D i „E=T. GN. EAST. WES-r )
CONTROL TYPE N��RTHBOUND: E251 GN
-F'r-;Fr I C ')OLLIME=
--------------------------------------------------------------------- )
EE. WE NE SE
----
174 ii --
-r
r'I u'rT - _ --
ICIBER
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ,
EE i,.lE. ':B SE
------- --- -- ------- -------
}
.i
ADJUSTMENT FHCTORS
---------------------------------------------------------------c-,r--`
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
- ------ --- ----------------
-----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND ----- ---
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
----------------------------------
SU TRUCKS is COMBINATION '
AND RVIS VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
-------- ------- -----
0
EASTBOUND i_; ------------- 7
0
WESTBOUND 0 0 r;
NORTHEOUND 0 0
SOUTHEOUND --- ---
CRITICAL GAF=
---------------------------------------------------------
ABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Taol e-10_2)- -VALUE-- ADJUSTMENT C cITTCAL GAP �
"•1 I NOR RIGHTS ----------- ------------
4 0. 50 v .Su 0 .00 -
MAJOR LEFT'-
5. 50 5. 50 c
. 50
MINOR LEFTS
.� .00 . .u0 0 . 00 8 .00
• ib G . �tII _ ------------
511 0 .I,CI
Mm:DF _E^T=
Lac 5 .50 5. 50 0 . 00 5 . 5cl
MINOR LEFTS
NR = . Gly _ .00 0 .00 _ .00
CaP aCI T" AND LEVEL—O=—EERVICF Pace-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
T TEN— ACTUAL
=_Q— "IAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT ',i (ocph) _ (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v • OS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MIKOR STREE-
N6 LEFT 15 423 414 > 414 > 399 > s
> 539 > 506 >A
RIGHT is 730 730 > 730 > 712 > A
MHJOR STREET
X18 LEFT 29 890 890 890 861 A
;5 HLP'!: UNS IGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-!
E*.�{*•��ss•iEiE•?rtiF�•IEr�EiF�f'�����r9E�Ff?ilEiEIE�E#'lE•ft:iE9F9E9F•1F�E9E9EiFx�Et9E�E��iF9EiFiEiF�FIE�riE�E�i'+f�fs
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------- }
HVEP.AGE FUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . 1
. . . . . . . . . . . .
AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000 )
AAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 48
)AME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH =TREE'.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane )
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GL )
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS mmr dd/ : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6, 22/87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mon am peak Build
INTERSE•=710N TYPE sND CONTROL )
-----------------------------------------------------
. ERSET-. ON - `PE. -1!•!TER SE= . .ON
MAJOF SIRE_- T . F EM ON . EASTVWE ST
t"dTRCi_ 71PE NOR7HEOUND:
TRAFFIC =JME'=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Eg UB NE SE
!EF- --
7HRU - !so 1 -4 _RIGHT ^ aS --
--------------------------------------------------------------------- )
E ,J E' til E c
------- ------- ----1
}
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS - ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOLND 0 .00 90 20 N `
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
` SOUTHEOUND ----- --- --- —
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND ?V'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBC UID 0 0 ,
WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ,
qORTYBOUND
SDUTHSTUND
_rI I IC. _
---------------------------------------------------------------------
7ASULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGwT DIST. FINAL
(717; e 10-2) VALUE ADJUS7MENT CRIT: AL 3AP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
"INOR RIGHT=
Ns a . 50 6.50 0 .00 6 . 50
as 5 . 10 Z. 50 3 .00 5 . 50 ,
tItJCR L T'S
18 = . 00 3. 30 : . 30 2 .00
_Ll U .UU
740F =
S.
ocl
:ADAC I T ,` AND
LEVEL.—OF—
SERVICE Forge-3
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
PGTEN— ACTUAL
Gw— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RHTE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACIT`:' CAPACITY
MOVEMENT ukpcph , c kpcph: c (pcph) c Cpcph) c = c
M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREET
REST
NE --`T 41 418 410 > 410 > 369 > 8
> 492 > 426 >A
RIGHT 25 727 727 > 727 > 701 A
MAJOR STREET
WE LEFT 31 B83 883 883 852 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST./WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 48
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH -STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
GATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/22/8:
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NS Fri pm peak
TNTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
------------------------------------------------------------------
!NTEF=•ECTION TYPE: T-'.NTERSECTION
Ml-"IJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/.JEST
CONTE OL TYPE NOR T HBOUND: STOP S I GN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WB NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LE' 0 1 c 3S --
L4RU 207 X00 0 --
i 13HT c$
------------------------------------------------------------------
EE• WE Ne
--
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS Cft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ---
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV' S VEHICLES is MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EsSTBOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHBOUND --- --- ---
=RITZ CAL GAPE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
, Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRIT:CAL G"F
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
NE w . 50 5. 50 0 .00 6. 50
- ' AjOR LEF'=
Q _ .50 5.50 0 .00 5.50
MINOP LET
NE = . JO 3. 00 0 .00 S . 00
1
CAPACIT'r' AND LEVEL-OF- EFVI CE F sae-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pt,TEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOYEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACIT`i
MOVEMENT vfpcph : c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREE .
N8 LEFT _ 391 386 > 386 244 B
> 488 41e :A
RIGHT =L 702 702 > ?02 > 665 > A
MAJOR STREET
WB LEFT 20 854 854 854 834 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 48
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore`a Lane
NAME OF THE r=,NE;LYS7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS c mmi dd/y/: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/22/,,7
TIME PERIOD SNF;L-(ZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fri pm peak Build
INTERSECTION T\,-'PE AND CONTROL
--------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECT'_ ON TYPE: --IN'TE:=-EC-1 ON
MA OR -REET D I REC-: ON: E."ST/WEST
CONTPOL 7'(FE r•JORTHBOUND : STOF SIGN
TRAFr I C k)OL►_tMES
------------------------------------------------------------------
r
EEWE- NB
- - - -
- -SB- X
-- •�
THRU 10? _;0 0
R.r GHT 0 --
Vl
NUMBE= OF Lr,FJE_
------------------------------------------------------------------
EE t.,;g .JB =5
LA=NE'= 1 1 -------
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS page--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ---
VEHICLE COMPOSITION .
---------------------------------------------------------------------
5U TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND 0 0 ,j
WESTBOUND 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 U
SOUTHEO!ND --- --- ---
CRITICAL GAPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADjUSTMENT :RITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
NB 6.50 5.50 0 .00 6. 50
HAJOR LEFTS
w6 5.50 5. 50 0 .00 5. 50
1-1I NOR LEFT'=
titB S .00 ':.00 l . 01? S . 00
CAPr= :TY AND LEVEL-GF-SERVICE page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PCTEN- ACTUAL
LOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
FATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOP STREET
NE LETT 56 379 371 > 371 > 315 > 6
> 461 > 364 >E
RIGHT 41 _=2 692 > 692 > 651 > A
MAJOP STREET
WE LEFT 29 230 330 230 801 A
1 985 HC:'1: UNSI��iJi=;L1ZED jNTERSECTIO.NIS ragE-1
#iF��:��iff�FfjE•Yt.icyF!csye�EiFli�yFi�E�iF9E�iFiEiF•iF�E9E9Etf�E9EiE�iE9t�E�iFdEiFdelEde�9E�r�sE��s�i.�9F�dE�
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE PUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
AREAPOPUILATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 48
Nt"ME OF -HE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore's Lane
NAME OF THE F;NALYST. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
l
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/18/87
TIME ^ERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NS Sat pm peak
INTERSE=TION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Its-ERSE::.-ON TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
•iAl-TOR _=7=_==_T :I RECT:CSN: EAST/WEST
-`(PE NORTHBOU.vD: STOP SIGN
TRAFr I C 0O!__!P.tES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ES WE NE SE
LCE= 0 Z3 28 --
—HRU i 7660 ij --
R_uHT 18 G
NL; IBER _- LraNE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
------- ------- ------- -------
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS QW ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ---
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS X COMBINATION
HND RV'S VEHICLES :: MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
ENSTSOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHSCLND 0 0 0
OU;HEOUN --- --- ---
GAPS
_C�=.'T'r'�-''' --------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINsL
(Tab i e 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
MINOR RIGHTS
..iE 0 .50 0 .00 6.50
MAJOR LEF7-z We 5.i0 5.50 0 .00 E.SO
"!NOR
S
liVOR �. � 8.00
_ 0
',-APACIT'.- El 0 3 ERS. 11 r._
---------------------------------------------------------------------
=,TEN- r,CTU ;L
F!C - -IAL 'SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACIT`f CAPACITY CAPACITY GNPACIT`.'
MOVEMEtiT p _ , pcph) C (pCph) C :pCph: C = C - v LOS
------- -F
M ,- H
------ - ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ---
MINOR STREET
t-46 '_.FT ? 1 234 284 > '53 > C:
403 .337 >8
RIGHT c:5 634 634 > 634 > 599 A
MAJOR 3TPEET
W6 !EFT 763 766 763 737 A
1955 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
9E�9EdtiFiE#F�*9E�E�iE9E�EiFiE9E9E9FiF9E*9EiF�iFdEdE�EiFiE�E�E�F�FiF*iF9kiF9F�iFiEiEiE*lEdFiEiEiE1F�E��iFiF9FiFiE9t�4y9e*dEBE
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . route 48
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore 's Lane
NAMEOF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS mm/da/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/18/87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sat pm peak Build
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTE SEC7:ON TYPE: T-INTERSECTIQN
MAj OR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TTPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRHFA! C uOLUNES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WS NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LEF7 3 37 28
THRj 277 28C 0 --
RIGHT f? 0 40 --
UMEEj _F LANE=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
E5 WE AB =S
------- ------- ------- -------
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-`'-
------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- -
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
U TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- -----
EASTBOUND 0 Cr 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHSOUN7� --- --- ---
CRI I I C'±L 31=1PS
--------------------------------7-------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
P?INOR RIGHTS
NE ?u 5.90 0 .00 5. 90
t1hJOR LEFT'
-0 5 . 7�0 0 .00 S.220
MINOR LEFTS
Ns
. 10 7. 10 0 .00 7. 10
CAPACITYr AND L-EVE--GF—SERVICE page-20,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PC,—, EN—
----------PC EN— ACTUAL
LCs;::!— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERk)E
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMEi••:T v—"pcph : c (pcph) c (pcpn) c (pcph) c = _ — i- LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR
--MINOR :-',TREE7
NB LEFT 42 350 347 > - 347 > v c, > 2
> 46S > 3:,4 >8
RIGHT 44 704 704 > 704 > 660 F;
MAJOR STREET
WB LEFT 41 256 e56 256 5:5. A
1955 HCP'!: UNSI3NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
9t lE 9E iF•lE tib�9t�E�F?4 iF�F iF ifr�iE iE iF i�iE iE 9e#9E 9F 9E i*9F iE�if 1F iF 1F�E�e t 1F�F 9F iF iE*ifr iE*�E iF r 9E�E dF�iE�1E�f�F x dE iE�E 1E 9k•lE
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTHSTREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 48
NAME OF THE 4NPLYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE ANALYST kmm, dd; /y) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/22/87
TIMEPERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non am peak No Build
INTERSE:71O i T`.'PE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTER E:71 0 J PE: 4 EG
MHJOR r'T EZTI O ST
CONT?C_ TYPE NORTHBOUND : ;STOP S I GN
C0*;•JTROL TI'PE _OUTHBOUND : ST'IP SIGN
TRAFF: C QOL'JMF=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EE w6 NB =EE
----
LEFT 5 :
T H RU =0 7 135 , 0 cl
R.! GGT Y _ f
N;iMBEF :F LMhvE= -'=AGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E3 WE N8 =z-:
------- ------- ------- -------
1
=.IE USAGE
LTR L-
G•JUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
----------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES 'i: MOTORC'(CLES
----------- ------------- -------------
E;•;STBOUND 0 0 0
:.-JE'=TBOUIND 0 0 ii
-IORTHBGUNG 0 0 0
�JUTHBOUSND 0 0
CRITICAL GAPS
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR V"LUE:: ADJUSTED SIGHT D.IST . FINAL
(Table 20-'2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL ,,t-P j
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
rII1 0R RI i=HT'= 0 .00
�Er=T
EB
c c�� (� 7 1 .0 1 1 l�
_ .
l? .;i P THR OUGr
7 . 5C, - . Sig 3 . G .0
;1Irr��fi -EFTc-
lE _0
.00 0 .00 6 . 00
i
Palo?-3
------------------------------------------ --------------------------
N
N— ACTUAL
T Ih- MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
G-;FA:--IT."Y CAPACITY GA=-,:IT'( Cr,FF;GITY
t--lOvEMENI— pcpr. : c k,p cph) c �pcph7 c �pcph7 c = c — v LOS
p M i-± R H
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREET
N6 —EF" 1+= 409 404 404 - 394 g
THRO!GH C ti5�- 450 > ';� 450 > 42c 450 >A =;
HT _ 12 712 r
71 -1 710 h
'IINOR =TREET
SS —=FT = 411 40e, > 402 > 406
THROUGH 0 452 450 > 624 450 > 614 450 >A A
RIGHT S '=5 735 > , 35 727 > A
MAJOR =;TREE"
ES LE=T _ 905 905 905 899 A
WEA LEFT = 879 879 879 876 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAK. HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
APER POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREE-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 48
":PME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD 6
it I r "�2/8/
1r;-c ,�P THE i-ir•1tiL�� o. = ;iTli71! dam.• i' � • • • • • • • • • • 6•' may'
T:XE PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mon am peak Build
�. T"PE T rdTE�.3Ei=;:I L.d PE AND : tiT:-UL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
:r _-_T: 111•.1 T•. r • Y---_
MA_OR =-;,__- DIRE 1'I C,: : EAST/WEST
C11TROL 7YPE NORTHBOUND: STOP EI GN
CONTROL TYPE _OU"KEOUN : S T CP SIGN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EE we HE SE
_EF- E 1 -
HRU `0 18T 0
TTGAT _ _ A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
FS is NE Se
_sNE: '_ 11 1
."NE USM S_ _-R LTF
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
------------------------------------------------------------------e—
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (it) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
-------- ------ ----
EASTBOUND 0 .00 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
- 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90
'JEHI CLE COMPOSITION
--------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS COMEINAT ION
AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORC`!CLES
'AEST6E<U:,D 0 0 0
N0— ;80L dD 0 0 0
iUTHBOUNG 0 0
CRITICAL GAPS
1 --------------------------------------
TABUL AP VALUES "DJUSTED SIGHT DT -3T. FINN-
�. gal a 10-2 �.�ALUE 'D•�USTMENT CRITICAL
-------------- -------- ----------- -----------
r-1 I N OR RIGHTS
P16 :. =0 6.550 cl C.,0 6.50
=E u.50
`.r_ 5.50
EC -
Ti-ItiLUGi-
J J.L, ,
[,
LEF'=
-i i! 3. 1-10 _ .
IB _ . 0 3.00 i! 00 ..CIO
Da = .0
5.50
E E 5 . 5f _' . cl
lIty��F' TnROi G� 1=
"-!E -. _ -.50 ID . 0 101 - , 50
P1It4G^ E==
of E: . .00 0 .00 = . 00
CAPACIT-' AtdC, -EVEL-O=-c=RVICE Fa�iF-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
P OT=N- ACTUAL
FLOC,-- MOVEMENT SHARED RE3=RV=
RAT= CAF=,CIT`f CAPACITY CAPACITY cmp-4c:_"'
MOVEPIEN- kikp,=pn) = kpcph) • C ( pcph) = (ptph) C = _ - U LOS'
a M SH F.'
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MIrIOR STFEET
t•12- LEFT 18 408 402 > 402 > 3Q5 > 2
THFOUGH 0 452 449 > 441 449 419 449 >A A
RIGHT 4 711 711 > 711 > 707 > A
MINOR STREET
S8 LEFT 2 408 403 > 403 > 401 > A
THROUGH 0 450 447 _ > 621 447 > 611 447 >A A
RIGHT b 72-35 735 > 735 > 727 > A
MA.JOF. STREET
EE LEFT 6 905 905 905 899 A
W8 LEFT 4 876 876 876 872 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI*ZED INTERSECTIONS Paye-1
��4s1EiEiE9F��{iE�Fksr.ye•iifr.iEjF�iE�Er�E�9e*��E�E9E*iF)E*9F�9EiEjliE�9F�iE*9Efi!rit9E�eiFlF9EiE�Er.iFlF�FiE1edE�F
IDENTIFYING INFOF;-IATION
-----------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 48
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/22/87
TIME PERIOCi ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fri pm peak No Build
INTERSECTIO".J T)'PE AND CONTROL
-----------------------------------------------------------
I NTERS E OT 101.4 :'F=.
Mr,JOR STRE= DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE _IDU T HBOUND: 'STOP SIGN
' OLUME_D
---------------------------------------------------------
EEE 146 NB SB
THRL: 2
RIi3HT ti C 14
PJI.IME-i'EF' OF L"NE'= r;ND !-"NE Jl&r GE
----------------------------------------------------------
I.IE rJ6
cc ='c
------ ----r-- ------- -------
Lr,l\1 E= 1 1 1 1
L H N E U'=."„E L,TF -TR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
1 w
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
'::�U TRUC:'S COMBINATION
AND RV-'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLE
----------- ---- ------ -------------
EtiSTEOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHBOUND 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAP 'JALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
Table 10-2` VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
50 5.5G ci .00 6.50
6.50 7 .0 0 6.50
MAJOR LEFTS*
WE: 5. 5:= 5. 50 0 ,n0 C.J50
L'\
EB 5 .50 5.50 0 .00 5. 50
MINOR THROUGH
NES - .50 7 . Erj i .00
, • 5.tel- . t�- l� . �- 5;.
_ • J�� _ _I
'1IN R LEFTti
r-1 :_.00 8.00 0 _ .:iu
E 3.:1•0 3.00 3 . 00'
.5-l' .JI,
'IItJOr= �E=TS
1- 8.00 8.00 0 .00 8.00
5E 8.00 8 .00 0 .OI, 8.O0
1
J
CAPACITY AND --1 ---0!'-SERVICE Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN— ACTUAL
FLOI-J— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RHT= CAPACITY- CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v-.pr:.n - r (pCph) C (pCph) C (pCph) C = C — u LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREET
NB _EFT _ = 348 338 > 338 7 328 B
THROUGH 396 390 > 371 390 > 359 390 >B B
RIGHT = 669 669 > 669 > 667 > A
MINOR STREET
SB LEFT 57 351 > 351 > 342 B
THROUGH 396 390 > 503 390 > 477 387 >A B
RICHT : 5 710 710 > 710 > 694 > A
MAJOR. STREET
EES —EFT 20 875 875 875 855 A
WB LEFT 2 827 827 827 825 A
l VeE HCH: !ANSI GNALI ZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ATEA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 48
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DA-E OF THE ANAL7SI S Cmm/dd/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/22/£7
,TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fri pm peak Build
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
!N7ERSE:TION T'A'PE: 4-LET
Nr-;j_'R 'STFEET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TY F E NORTHBOUND:: ;STOP SIGN
CONTROL T� PE SOUTHBOUND : =•TOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUME=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB Q NP Se
---- ---- ---- ----
LEF- is 5 14THF! 257 200 3
0 -
F.'I G b- 14 _ a &
----------7----------------------------------------------------------
ES WE NB Es
------- ------- ------- -------
LsN Q 1 1 1
LRNE USAGE L74 LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-i
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT' TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHS+OUND 0 0 0
CRITICAL G"PS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
NE 0.50 6.50 0 .00 6.50
SE 6 .50 6.50 0 . 00 6. 50
MAJOR LEF-`
WE 5. 50 5.50 0 .00
EE T . 50 5.5C 0 .00 5. 00
MINOR THROUGi-y•_
SE 7 . 7.50 0 .jc - . _C,
I
MINOR LEF
E, 01
-
=E• 3. 9C, 5.00 0 .00 3 . 00
- , 5
JL • - _
x .00
E _ , 0i :x.00 u .1-t0 8.00
f
i
CAPr;Z,ITY r+i-1-L, LEt 0 -3ERYI Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
;:'OTEtd- ACTU►^-iL
FL Gi,,,!- TIAL MO:;EMENT SHARED RESERVE
PATE cr-1PACI-rY CAPACITY CAPACIT`( CAPACITY
MOVEMENT t)kpcpn ) c r M SH R SH�,pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
�
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
"ITN7R 'ETF=ET l
NE LEF— c:4333 > 333 > 31? > B
THRCUli3 c 31pl. 384 > 374 384 > 354 384 >E B
RIGHT - c:o6 666 > oda > bbl > A
MINOR STREET
S8 LEFT = 349 342 > 342 > 333 > B
THROUGH = 389 382 > 496 382 > 470 380 >A B (.
RIGHT 15 710 710 > 710 > 694 > A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 20 375 875 r 875 855 A
WB LEFT 819 819 819 814 A
' C
C
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED$ MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAMS OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route Oct
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
Di--TE OF T HE HNAL`(SI S (mrr/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/18/87
TIMEPERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sat pm peak No 6ui ? o
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IPJTE?oE-TION T;'PE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STRE-ET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: 'STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC ' !OLS MES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB 1,12. NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
-EF- 1G
J ,
THRU = ii u
PIG�-47
,JL'"-IEER 0: !SNE? r;ND Lr,NE USAGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
------- ------- ------- -------
-"NE._
'-r;11-11E LTR LTF.
ADJUSTME11T FACTORS Paye
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 9 .00 .90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPO5IT:ON
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND G 0 0
WES'TB0UNZ) 0 0 0
N0 RT HBC'JND- 0 0 0
JUVTF!E D ± 0 0
=�:ITICr-1 GAS =
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tr`;BUL=;R VALUES ADJUSTED S:GHT DIST. FINAL
''Tab? e 20-2) VALUE +DJUSTMENT CRITiCnL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINJOP, r I GHT_:
Jr x. 50 6 .50 0 .00 6. 50
_•B .50 5 .50 0 . 0 8. 50
MAJOR -E=T=
=.50 5.50 0 . 010 5 .5G
�S SG 5. 50 0 .CIO 5. 50
NOR �HROUGH`
'!c• =. !0 8, .00 11" . 110 S.0cl
3 . 00 =. 00ii3O.cl '1. a'_1
HNO LEVEL-CSF-SERQI CE P - -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DOTEt%- A CTUAL
-IAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CNF'�C1TY CAPAC;T`r CAPACITY CAPACIT;'
MOt.)EMENT v , pcph) C kpcoh ) C kp=ph) C kpcph) C = c - V ' O$
P, M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREET
NES LEFT 2 293 279 ` 2?9 > 276 > C
THROUGH 0 ?2C =17 > 427 317 > 421 317 Q B
RIGHT c o62 662 > 662 > 658
MINOR STREET
SB _EFT 3 234 281 > 281 > 273
THROUGH 0 E20 317 > 437 317 > 427 317 >A B
RIGHT 7 605 605 > 605 > 599 ? A
MAJOR. FTREE-
ES _=FT : 1 753 753 753 742 A
WB LEFT 820 820 820 319
a
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
*�*******�***•i6�*tx�**t**•lt•!E********�Eit�dE*��9HFiEiE�E*�iF*rt��ibz•iEiEit•dr**sem*iF�dF*•r.
IDENTIF`(ING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middletown Road
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 48
NAMEOF THE ANAL`('=T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE tmmidd/-Yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.'1S/87
TIME PERIOD ANHLYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sat pm peak build
INTERSECTION -YPE SND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION T'•'r-=: 4-:--;=O
MAJOR STREET J I RE---TION: EAST/WEST
•WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC 1)OLUME3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ES ;A'B NE se
LEFT 10 8 8 3
THRU 0 0
RIGHT : C, 5
-----------------------------------7---------------------------------
we flE B
------- ------- ------- -------
LriNES ? 1 1 1
Lr;rJE usr,GE -P, LTR
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND 0 0 0
SOUTHBOUND 0 n 0
CRITICAL GAPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- -
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR. RIGHTS
NB w .50 6.50 0 .00 6. 50
SB 6 .50 6.50 0 .00 _ . 50
MAJOR i EF S
ws 5.50 5.50 0 .00 1.5.0
EB 5. 50 1.50 0 .00 i. 30
MINOR THROUGHS
NE 7. 50 7.50 0 . 00 7 . =G
SB 7 . 50 7 .50 0 . 00 7 .50
NIi OR `EFTS
ND 8.00 8.00 0 .00 5. j0
JLC 8. 00 3.00 0 .0c. 8. 00
Ne S.IG 6.00 0 .00 8 .0,,U
BE 8.0cl 8.00 0 .00
`APr;:ITY Ar:C LEVEL—OF—SERVICE F-age-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN— ACTUAL
FL06,1— -IA_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
M IN OR
--MINOR S; BEET
NE __. _ 264 258 > 258 > 241 C
THROUGH 0 300 295 > 381 295 > 362 295 >B C
RIGHT 10 659 659 > 659 > 649 > A
MINOR STREET
SE _EFT c 268 262 > 262 > 258 > C
THROUGH 0 306 301 > 417 301 > 407 301 >A B
RIGHT 7 593 593 > 593 > 587 > A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 11 724 724 724 713 A
WB LEFT 9 813 813 813 804 A
1985 HCM: UNSIC44ALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-!
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
NAME OF THE t-JORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS -,mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0/22/07
TIMEPERI OD .;NAL` -ED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mon am peak '-,lo Build
ItdT ERLE ,-:ON i�,'PE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSEC710N TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MA,- OR 'STREET DIRECTICN: EAST/WEST
:0NTROL T YFE SOJTHBOLIND: *YIELD SIGN
TF.AFc'IC VOLUME=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WE NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 4C: u
THFU 240 -- O
to NEE4 1--iF
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EE :.IE P-IE rS
------- ------- ------- -------
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-`
-------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
---- --- -------- ------ -------N---------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- ___
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
--------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND P.V'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLE3
------- ----- -------
EASTBOUND 0 o 0
WELTE-OUND 0 0 0
NGFTHECUND --- ---
=OU T HBOUND 0 0 J
Cr:-I CAL Gi=;PS
----------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
-(Table-10_2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
,I GHT.3 - -------- ----------- ------------
;R 5. Z0 5.20 0 .00
5 . 20
5.20 0 .00
=S = . 40
s
1
CAPr,�ITr• ",V-11) LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Paee-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
FOTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITf CAPA"Irt CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c :pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR aTRE
S8 _==T 70 47 x;63 46-' 391 9
> 554 > 447 >k
RIGHT 35 513 12-31 IQ33 > 933 > 89L i A
MAJOR STREET
Er LEFT 44 919 919 919 875 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Paye-:
*ttiF*�*���tx*iEi6lE�lF�FiE�iFy��edE�F*�F�iiiFiEiF9E�E�***9E 9F 9F 9E*9Fifr�Fit�*dE�9E9F�E9E*�E���**�*%��*
'IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
1
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lanz
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE 'JF THE ANkLYSI S (mm/dd/xy) . . . . • . . . . . • . • • • • • . 6/22/87
TIMEp=MOD NAL'(ZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mon am peak Build
1NTEF.E_E=71.ON TYPE i4ND CONTROL
--------------------------------------
T"PE: T-INTER SECTION
*!AjOR =!REET DIRE_T_ON. EHST:'WEST
_:ONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: YIELD SIGN
VOLU"^ES
------------------------------------
E`, WB NB SB
:.EFT --:�a O -- 83
`FiFU c�= _4C, -- u
YI1jHT _ _`'}
----
:i'MBF=------, --------------------------------------------------------
EB WB N6 :F 6
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- -
SOUTHBOUND 0 . 00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
----------------------------------T----------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTEOUND 0 0 0
WE ,TBOUND +i 0
NORTHEOL',ND --- --- ---
,_OUTHSOUND 0 0 0
CRITICAL GAP-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABS SLA'R 1)r SLUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. F I tdi ;.
(''able 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
"1INOR RIGHT-3
.E' =. 20 5. 0 .00 5 .� i
Mi4JOR LE—F—_
5.2
P9INOR LEFT=
SB o . 4C' - .40 0 .00 x. 40
40
CAPA I"`( ANG LEVcL--OF—SERVICE p�Qe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN— ACTUAL
FLM.)— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT kj(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS
p M SH R SH
------- -------= --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR STREET
3B j E 473 458 > 45e > 367 > E
> 554 > 415 >A
RIGHT 47 931 931 > 931 > 884 > A
MAJOR STREET
E'3 LEFT 48 915 915 915 866 A
1
1925 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE wNALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/16187
TIMEPERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fri pm peak No Bui1C
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTI ON TYPE: T-INTERSECTI.ON
MAJOR 3TR_ET DIRECT: ON: EAST/WEST
[ON;ROL 7YPE SOUTHBOUND: -YIELD S I GN
TRAF :C VOL!SME:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Eis 06 NE SE
LEF- 22 0 -- 40
.THRU 376 285 0
RIGHT 0 24
DUMBER OF !HUES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB !:v2 NS SB
Lr-'.icy
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (it) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- —
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
1 "
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS COMEINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES X MOTORCYCLES
----------- --t---------- -------------
EASTBOUND
------------
EASTBOUND 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND --- --- ---
`OITHEOUND ' 0
CRITICAL GHPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
i;able 10-2) VALUE - ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL 3AP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
=B 5.20 5.20 0 .00 5.20
MAj3R LEFTS
E5 5.20 5.20 0 .00 5. 20
i 1I NOR :LEFT'
05 6.40 6.40 0 .00 _.40
1
CAP,: C-17, ANZI -E' =_-QF-.3ERYI CE
---------------------------------------------------------------�--- --
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLG�. TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RA-I -= CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MGt=MENT vipcph� = (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcpi,) c = c - U LOS
F M SH r SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR
--MINOR STRE-7-
23 LEFT 44 370 364 364 > 320 > 8
> 468 > 397 >8
RIGHT 26• 892 892 > 892 > 86r: A
MAJOR. STP.E_="
EE __FT 24 880 880 880 855 A
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
-----------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/,JEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
NAME OF THE N0RTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
NAMEOF THE "",NAL'(ST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3D
DATE OF THE Nt�1ALYSI S (mm/dd/yy) . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o/22/S7
TIME PERIOD i•;I rIL'i'ZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fr ; pm peak Build
INTERS=C'ION T'-:'FE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSE��TI ON 7".-FE: T-INTERSEC?'ION
MANOR 'STREET -DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL `YPE 0UTHBOUND : YIELD SIGIN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB i.JB r-1B oe
---- ---- ---- ----
-E;T
F i GHT 1 4,:
'Wr-,IE_�: -NE_
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB 10 2. r118 SS.
------- ------- ------- -------
LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pd9E'�
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (it) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- --- ---
j SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90. 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS '!. COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EA'STSOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND --- --- ---
SOUTHEOUND 0 0 0
CRITICAL GAP'S
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TASULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
se 0 5.20 0 .00
MAJOR LEFTS
5.20 z 0 .cl0
MINOR LEF-S
-"'PACITI ANC, —EVEL—OF—SERVICE Page--
--------------------------------------------------------------------_
POTEN— ACTUAL
FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACIT`i'
MOVEMENT vtpcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOE
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MI14OR STFEE—,
EB LEFT 55 358 349 > 349 > 294 > C
> 452 > 364 >B
RIGHT 33 883 883 > 383 > 850 >
MAJOR STREET
ES LEFT 36 862 862 862 826
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREAPOPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
1
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore's Lane
NAME OF THE ANAL`(ST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DATE OF THE "`NAL'1(*:j: I 5 (mm/dd.'Yy) . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . • 6/18/87
TIMEPERIOD ANAL"(ZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sat pm peak No Build
INTEPSE1 10N TYPE AND CONTROL
----------------------------------------------
INTEPSE.. , - -.N1 7 PE: T-1P--1TEzc-E0T:JN
MAJOR ST;=_T DIRECT.Ot-1: EAST/WEST
CONTROL 7-(FE SOUTHBOUND: YIELD SIGN
TRAFFIC ',)OLUME'L
---------------------
=E 1,JB NS SB
L==T 54
T��.1 f 344 -- 0
2
RIGHT � -- `'
PJUP_tE'---ER ��F- --
L- -- -----------------------------------------------------
EB WE: "JB c 1
-------
Lr;NE= cl 1 --
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- —
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EAS76OUND 0 0 0
WE=STBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND --- --- ---
CRITICAL GAPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FIHwL
(Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS
se 5.20 5.20 0 .00 5.Zo
_ t~1r=,JCR LE=TS
EE 5.20 5. 20 0 .00 5.zci
MINOR LEFTS
SB 6 . 40 x.40 0 .00 0.40
Ci=PAZIT•Y' AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW'- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPAC IT,Y CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c fpcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
F h; SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ ---
MINOR
--MINOR STREET
t LEFT 55' 318 310 > 310 > 250 > C
> 404 > 309 >B
RIGHT 35.- 832 832 > 832 > 796 > A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT :::5, 81.5. 815 81.5 780 A
1985 HCM• UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PEAKHOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150000
NOME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Route 25
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREE! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moore' s Lane
NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GD
DwTE OF THE ANALYSI'= (mm/ dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/18:`07
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sat pm peak Build
INTERSECTION TYPE AND =ONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
iNTER'EEMON T'Y'QE: 7-INTERSECTION
•.,H OF, STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: YIELD SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMEI
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ES WE NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
`EF- 40 0 -- 64
THRU 393 244 -- u
RIGHT 0 4, 40
--------------------------------------------------
EE. WE tNB 5B
L"NE= i 1 -- 1
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2
------------------=--------------------------------------------------
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
------- ---------- ---------------- -----------------
EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND ----- --- ---
SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION
AND RV'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES
----------- ------------- -------------
EASTBOUND 0 0 0
WESTBOUND 0 0 0
NORTHBOUND --- --- ---
SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0
CRITICAL GAPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FIN&
<Table 10-2? VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF
-------------- -------- ----------- ------------
MINOR RIGHTS _
ss 5.20 5.20 0 .00 1.20
MWOR LEFT,
ES - 5.20 5.20, 0 .09 5.Z0
MINOR LEFT'=
SE 6 . 40 5. 40 0 .00
40 6.40 0 .00 _ .40
t
I
CAPACIT`r' AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page
# -------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLGW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — V L
p M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ —
t MINOR STREET
^_.B LEFT 70 310 300 > 300 > 229 >
_ > 397 > 283 >C
RIGHT 44 826 826 > 826 > 762 >
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 44 805 805 805 761
1 -
L
REVISIONS TO SUPPLEMENT
AND
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
OCTOBER 13 , 1988
DECEMBER 30, 1988
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672
Greenport,New York 11944
(516)477-0030
Fax(516)477-0198
December 30 , 1988
Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold , L. I .
New York - 11971
Re : D. E. I . S.
Cedarfields/Mooresland
Dear Mr. Orlowski :
In accordance with recent meetings and discussions with Dave
Emilita and Valarie Scopaz , we have revised the Supplement
to subject Impact Statement to include maps of the Zone of
Influence both of the basic plan and the revised plan ( 100
units ) . We have also added another alternative ( 10D units )
based on the latest information that it may be an extended
period of time before approval could be obtained for hook-up
of units to the Greenport Sewage Treatment Plant.
Based on the above meetings and discussions , it is our
understanding that the enclosed documents will complete the
D. E. I . S. submittal . -
Sincerely ,
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Merlon E. Wiggin h . D. ,M. E.
President
Enclosure
cc : Mr. John Costello
Mr. Donald Bracken
SECTION A-1
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
FROM FERTILIZER NITRATES
FOR
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
BASIC PLAN ( 168 UNITS)
PREPARED BY :
CHARLES R. VELZY ASSOCIATES, INC.
ONE DLD COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 430
CARLE PLACE, NEW YORK - 11514
AND
PECQNIC ASSOCIATES, INC .
ONE BOOTLEG ALLEY
GREENPORT, NEW YORK - 11944
JUNI 23 , 1987
REVISED : OCTOBER 13 , 1988
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
To access the impacts of fertilizer nitrates on groundwater
quality in the on-site well , estimates of the well ' s re-
charge zone and nitrate concentrations in recharge waters
are presented. Reference is made to reports previously
prepared as part of the area ' s water resource management
program.
The recharge zone for a production well is represented by a
circular area with the well at the center. The charge zone
(or capture zone) of the on-site well can be estimated by
the method of Todd ( 1964 ) , as presented in the North Fork
Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York ( ERM/Camp ,
Dresser & McKee , 1983 ) . The method allows for the
estimation of the radius of influence of a pumping well ,
based on the expected pumping rate and natural recharge
rates from precipitation :
Q = r 0 2
X W
where, Q = effective well pumping rate
ro = radius of influence
w = natural recharge rate
The estimated production capacity of the on-site well is
120 ,000 gallons per day (gpd ) . Using an annual , long-term
average recharge value of 20 inches ( ERt4/Camp , Dresser &
McKee, 1983 ) , the radius of influence is tabulated as :
o V y9
ro = 120 ,000 al/da
1 . 75 X -2 ga ay square oot
ro = 1 .79 x 10' ft 1800 feet
The radius of influence (r ) defines the circular area
around the well from which infiltrating precipitation is
captured and discharged to the surface. A value of 1800
feet corresponds to an area of about 10 , 179 ,000 square feet ,
or 234 acres . ( See attached drawing . )
Based on this analysis , the proposed development is found to
be entirely within the recharge zone of the well . The
impact of nitrate fertilization of turfgrass in the
development can be assessed by determining what affect
development of 50 of these acres , or 21% of the recharge
area , would have on existing nitrate concentrations .
Nitrate concentrations (Nitrate as Nitrogen ) in the well ' s
recharge water zone have been measured previously as 2. 1
mg/L, as indicated in a letter from ECOTEST Laboratories ,
dated May 5 , 1986 , attached hereto .
The average effect of lawn fertilizers , using data
reflecting average turf management practices in Eastern
Suffolk County follows :
Nitrogen and Overall Nitrogen
Water Recharged From Concentration in
Substance Turf Sewage Other Recharge (mg/L)
Water ( in . ) 13.5 5 . 6 18.2 9 .3 (On site septic
system)
Nitrogen ( lb/Acre) 24.0 52.4 4 .2 3 . 94 (Public Sewer)
Land use is based on residential with 2 to 4 dwelling units
per acre . Average turf management practices would estimate
the application rate of 2.5 pounds of fertilizer per 1 , 000
square feet per year (Hughes and Porter, - 1983 ) .
Resultant nitrate concentrations in pumped groundwater would
be expected to represent an average of the three concentrations
discussed above, and can be calculated from the equation :
percent o nitrate percent of percent of itratewater from concen- + water from (1tratd\
oncen- water from Ct
oncen-new devel - tration existing ration remaining ration
opment developmen undeveloped
natural are
Total Water resultant
volume- 100% nitrate
Concentra-
tion
Using a radius of influence ( r ) of 1800 feet , the total area
of influence equals 233. 7 Acres .
The new development of 48.7 Acres represents 20 .8% of total .
The existing development of 23. 1 Acres represents 9.9% of total .
The remaining natural area of 161 . 9 Acres represents 69.3% of total .
(20.8%) (3 .94 mg/L) + (9.9%) (9 .3 mg/L) + (69 . 3%) (2. 1 mg/L) _
( 100%) (resultant nitrate concentration )
Resultant Nitrate Concentration = 3 .2 mg/L
Based on a review of existing data , the impact of the
application of nitrate fertilizers would not result in
nitrate concentrations in excess of accepted water quality
criteria . A value of 3.2 mg/L represents an average value.
Concentrations below this would be expected as a result of
the proposed fertilization monitoring program recommending an
application rate of one pound of fertilizer per one thousand
square feet . As previously stated , continuing monitoring of
the water quality from the new well and that of strategically
placed monitoring wells will be the best indication of the
effectiveness of the proposed fertilizing covenented
restrictions .
REFERENCES
Hughes , Henry B.F. and Keith Porter, Land Use and Ground
Water Quality in the Pine Barron_ s of Southampton , Corne 1
Tniversity , 1983.
North Fork Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York ,
ERM-Northeast/Camp , Dresser & McKee , 1983 .
J
77 WOW"
Ica 2Q5 5.5
100
111. .. 1•. ,+. • - . - •
18.0 •. �' '.
-5.5O
19:0 19A a "1.J
,. :.�::- - •, ,, . .; �, I7y
` . 10.5 x Q
W \ 21.0 la
X -
220-
' -- 17.5 I 2 2 0-
16.0 �` Q pN
�'�• `` .. � '` 1� �'.`"�_ Mod ' 'd -s .:. Nti'� .. z. �=� x { � �
17.0
19.0 •
.....
lig100
, • 10.5
X X5.5'• r
18.0 , � �
XA
000,
6.0 l 18.0 `
A 2
13.5 18 0 00060
olowl
110,
9.0
�QC�` 6.5 • AL
AL
9.5
loo
14,
loll
AL
AL
AIL
13.0
AL
• :. - x9. ; o ,� GREENPORT Q:QAIL
AL
AL
5.5
10.5 * Ohm
• ' ,
lool 9.0
6.5
9.5
_ to
loll
14
Ow 0000 AL
AL
13.0 �. �` •1�\-�'%G- -`��\ /� - �: .
IN
x9.0 6.s •/_ „-/i Q G R EEN PORT Q +°•
woo
Ao
•� � X 10.5 _ _ �j�� -�. �—
,, '' •'�. :' :�, 6.0
�'It. •���a''�" ,t'• < V• . .'.' r� •y �// ' �� moi, •Y ;,.
♦ AL
. • o
• d / XT.
E
dos
12.0
N
_OR?_N— ._ A-
16.0 • .
--- — I i
}' WATER OF GREENPORT .--� I • BISON AVE
MA
5 . / TOW5.5' 0
1.0
I Q Q
t�/ �•+ , . '�. �. ' ,' i 1 a I WEST ST ,
• // 18.0 19.5 X 13. � O�••••��
��3/C PG��/ •* // 1 12 .5 t i LJ Q `•r''
611VI 7-S
i . == MAPLE
N�F ' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT — 7. i BLEACHERS S '' • .
r 'Or •,1lh;' .. X 11.5
C r�,1 RESIDENTIAL & COMM , . �--
EX ST .. G r ;1656 i 1 13-t0 D
t�E.�lELOT�i ENT — i•`,� cif .r• Q
0NDEVE _'"ED NATURAL AREA
SECTION A-2
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
FROM FERTILIZER NITRATES
FOR
CEDARFIELDS AND MOORESLAND
REVISED PLAN ( 100 UNITS)
PREPARED BY :
CHARLES R. VELZY ASSOCIATES, INC.
ONE OLD COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 430
CARLE PLACE, NEW YORK - 11514
AND
PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
ONE BOOTLEG ALLEY
GREENPORT, NEW YORK - 11944
DECEMBER 29 , 1988
GROUNDWATER IMPACT
To access the impacts of fertilizer nitrates on groundwater
quality in the on-site well , estimates of the well ' s re-
charge zone and nitrate concentrations in recharge waters
are presented . Reference is made to reports previously
prepared as part of the area ' s water resource management
program.
The recharge zone for a production well is represented by a
circular area with the well at the center. The charge zone
(or capture zone) of the on-site well can be estimated by
the method of Todd ( 1964) , as presented in the North Fork
Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York ( ERM/Camp,
Dresser & McKee , 1983) . The method allows for the
estimation of the radius of influence of a pumping well ,
based on the expected pumping rate and natural recharge
rates from precipitation : x
Q = ro2 x w
where , Q = effective well pumping rate
ro = radius of influence
w = natural recharge rate
The estimated production capacity of the on-site well is
120.000 gallons per day (gpd ) . Using an annual , long-term
average recharge value of 20 inches ( ERM/Camp , Dresser &
McKee, 1983 ) , the radius of influence is- tabulated as :
r° Q
r° = 120 ,000 al/da
V 3 . 75 x 10-z gal/day/square foot
ro = 1 . 79 x 103 f t 1800 feet
The radius of influence (r ) defines the circular area
around the well from which infiltrating precipitation is
captured and discharged to the surface. A value of 1800
feet corresponds to an area of about 10 , 179 ,000 square feet ,
or 23� acres . ( See attached drawing . )
Based on this analysis , the proposed development is found to
be entirely within the recharge zone of the well . The
impact of nitrate fertilization of turfgrass in the
development can be assessed by determining what affect
development of 25.4 of these acres , or 10. 9% of the recharge
area , would have on existing nitrate concentrations .
Nitrate concentrations ( Nitrate as Nitrogen ) in the well ' s
recharge water zone have been measured previously as 2. 1
mg/L, and as previously indicated , that level which would be
expected from undeveloped or natural areas .
The average effect of lawn fertilizers , using data
reflecting average turf management practices in Eastern
Suffolk County follows :
Nitrogen and Overall Nitrogen
Water Recharged From Concentration in
Substance Turf Sewage Other Recharge (mg/L)
Water ( in . ) 13.5 5 .6 18.2 9 .3 (On site septic
system)
Nitrogen ( lb/Acre) 24.0 52.4 4.2 3 .94 .(Public Sewer)
Land use is based on residential with 2 to 4 dwelling units
per acre. Average turf management practices would estimate
the. application rate of 2.5 pounds of fertilizer per 1 ,000
square feet per year (Hughes and Porter, 1983 ) .
As the revised plan will not be utilizing public sewer, then
the resultant nitrate concentrations in pumped groundwater
would be expected to represent an average in the two
concentrations of natural undeveloped area and residential
development with on-site septic system.
percent ofnitrate percent of itrate percent of itrate
water from concen- water from concen- water from concen- ...
new devel - tration + existing tration remaining tration
opment development undeveloped
atural are
Total Water (nitrate
esultant
volume-100X
oncentra-
tion
Using radius of influence (r ) of 1800 feet , the total area
of influence equals 233.7 Acres .
The new development of 25.4 Acres (the remaining portion of
the 48. 7 Acres would remain undeveloped ) represents 10.9% of
total . The existing development of 23. 1 Acres represents
9 .9% of total . The remaining natural area of 185.2 Acres
represents 79.2% of total .
( 10.9%) (9 . 3 mg/L) + (9.9%) (9.3 mg/L) + (79.2%) (2. 1 mg/L) _
( 100%) (resultant nitrate concentration )
Resultant Nitrate Concentration = 3.6 mg/L
Based on a review of existing data , the impact of the
application of nitrate fertilizers would not result in
nitrate concentrations in excess of accepted water quality
criteria . A value of 3.6 mg/L represents an average value.
Concentrations below this would be expected as a result of
the proposed fertilization monitoring program recommending an
application rate of one pound of fertilizer per one thousand
square feet . As previously stated , continuing monitoring of
the water quality from the new well and that of strategically
placed monitoring wells will be the best indication of the
effectiveness of the proposed fertilizing covenented
restrictions .
REFERENCES
Hughes , Henry B. F. and Keith Porter , Land Use and Ground
Water Quality in the Pine Barrons of Southampton , Cornell
University , .
North Fork Water Supply Plan , Suffolk County , New York,
ERM-Northeast/Camp, Dresser & McKee , 1983 .
ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVES
Because of the possibility that the Village of Greenport
would not have their sewer plant upgraded for several more
years , and without it it is not expected that the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services will allow hook-up of
the proposed units to the plant , then one of the
alternatives would be to reduce the number of units to a
half acre density yield and utilize in-ground sewer, septic
and leaching facilities . This alternative layout would
propose sixty (60) town house units and forty (40)
affordable housing units , in accordance with the enclosed
alternate site plan .
\\ 205 0 z
T.
Y 16 x .
44� AL
17.5 �' �� O v `/�` � > P`�� r •. ,, .
,. -'°- ° ,. • _ � 190 190• •
10.5 C> x 1�.5
Ak
`, { P►R
21.0 to
0 0�
` i9. ° �
_
i�.5 � 22 01 '
la.o
oN Q
. . �
` IL
6.5 /,, -�� 17.0 19.0
5.5
lo
13.5 •
* x,9.0 10.5
x 18.0
Al
18.06.0
\ �"
13.5 \ 18.0 ' d 2
6.0
1100, 9.0
/QOM 6.5
"olAL
9.5
1 /r ! 000
4 `` e .—,I t>s: ,'y►M+Sa. .
ol
16
- Ilk—
m.0
� A
:. GREENPORT �� J
6.5 - �{� O i� Il / W
ALwoo v
5.5
t ,���
F3:5 . , ° � � ! �--�_ 10.5 • ' - - o � •,�— � .,
-. --- • • -
6.0
- r - - -
.............. 9.0
. . 6.5
'
lool .5.5
j - 13.0
4, X 9.0 � /ice
. 6.5 _ +
GREENPORT
Iv
10.5 AIL
- -
6.0
175TT _3L
G `
L..• "+fi 4:s ;.�. �` -� �." , � a 13.5• - f IN,
. V
o
EX
12.0
y 18.0 NORTH
-- ,
•` CWATER OF GREENPORT
AVE 'OTOWE 5.5MADISON
X ,
oe.
fl.O I WEST ST
i
REVISED PLAN .* 18.0 19.5x I d r
4.
.5 12 13• `p
�-� . .
CEI
NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT t ,
1 ,
,.� EXISTING RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL'S"'�� � � /�� 1m � BLEACHERS MAPLE SP -
DEVELOPMENT X16
11.5
�.0 X
UNDEVELOPED NATURAL AREA - ' yrs 13. 1 a a
t
WELL DATA
FANNING, PHILLIPS 8 MOLNAR
909 MARCONI AVENUE
RONKONKOMA,NEW YORK 11779
RICHARD FANNING,P.E.(1931 1964) 516/737-6200
KEV114 ).PHILLIPS,P.E.,Ph.D. 719/767-3337
CARP A.MOLNAR,p E. TELECOPIER 516/737-2410
April 19, 1989
Mr. Donald Bracken
Ms. Diane Carroll
100-30 South Jersey Avenue
Setauket, New York 11733
Re: Evaluation of Test Well #10
Dear Ms. Carroll & Mr. Bracken:
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the above referenced report.
Should you have any questions please contact Martin Klein or
myself.
Very truly yours,
Kevin J. Phillips, P.E. , Ph.D.
Principal, Fanning, Phillips
and Molnar
KJP/1 s
PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION
Fanning, Phillips and Molnar was retained by Mr. Donald
Bracken for the purpose of evaluating a test well (#10) located
on the south border of the proposed Cedarfields and Mooresland
project site in the village of Greenport, Town of Southold (see
figure 1 for location) . The primary concern was chloride
contamination of the pumping well with time.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
1 Pump Test results - short duration (24 and 48 hr. ) see
figure 2.
2. Pump Test results - long duration (16 days) see figure 3.
3 . Geologic Log of pumping well - see figure 4 .
4 . Other Geologic Logs (USGS & SCDHS) see Appendix A.
REVIEW
Based upon the pump test results for well #10 in September
1987,the following parameters were calculated; transmissivity,
storativity, hydraulic conductivity, specific capacity of the
well (see Appendix B for calculations) .
The results of our calculations indicate that the specific
capacity of well #10 is approximately 20 GPM/foot of drawdown.
This well is therefore highly productive, due to the favorable
hydraulic characteristics of the porous media.
The chloride concentrations, as shown in figure 1 and 2,
reveal that the quality of water in well #10 is presently
acceptable. However, chloride concentrations in the well will
increase, if excessive or careless pumping occurs as shown in'
Figure 2 .
ANALYTIC ANALYSIS
The hydrogeologic conditions of the project site present a
number of variables that should be considered for the design of
the proposed groundwater supply well . The analysis of
operational and well design criteria has been sought through a
number of references. Appendix B presents the applied equations
and calculations for the well design and operation.
Due to the chloride concentrations detected in test well #10
during the short and long term pump tests (as shown in Figures 1
and 2) design and pump rate of this test well has proven to be
unfavorable. However, an alternate well design was investigated
and evaluated. The calculations were analyzed for a well set at
a depth of 10 feet below the hard pan strata. The resultant pump
rate or permissible pump rate was calculated to be approximately
140 gpm.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. WELLS
As the depth of the fresh water lense is not known, it is
recommended that the well depth be set at 10 feet below the hard
pan strata. In addition, we recommend that two (2) wells be used
and spaced 100 feet on centers. The two wells should be pumped
at 100 gpm. The reason for this is that the effects of upconing
will be greatly reduced if the withdrawal is distributed over a
larger area.
2. FREQUENCY OF PUMPING
The frequency of pumping each well should be pumped for 24
hours on alternate days, with one day of rest between pumping.
3 . CHLORIDE TESTS
Chloride tests should be performed on both wells on a weekly
basis for six months and then reviewed by FP&M.
FINAL NOTE
It is our opinion that the chloride concentration in
this or any other well cannot be predicted with sufficient
accuracy to guarantee the chloride concentration in time. For
example, severe drought or rain periods will drastically effect
the depth of the fresh water lense and the chloride
concentrations will vary accordingly. However, if our
recommendations are followed, the wells should produce high
quality water. Note that this study focuses on chlorides and
that no representation is made regarding nitrates, pesticides or
any other contaminants.
References
See Appendix C for the preparers qualifications.
Rocky Pt
119
[AST
SITE
STIR ING
!nlat.Pt s . •�.
s J A
� N _•�.` ell
INL in
J►
can.
COjM.
11 P.
JA X14►
Ixu Jx i1WY l� ''
J, •`t
..Yw. Cfpvis
is . w •a,;,;,., 0 b:` wpunysPt
•��. ��� � Nay
25
3oJ�,p o
t
4 pft
oWq� r�c'•'E�dP�PP9
a
fib-
COVE •Dsrirtg Pt `tom'o • .
PIPES t .<< v,.•' ,,,
Fannin Pt / ,•; o•
••'P a ..,
SCALE IN FEET (Approx.)
o z000 woo c000 6000
FIP&M FIGURE 1 -SITE LOCATION
G l e 14 30 36 42
60
v
50
z
0
D
? 40
v
z
v
0
20
10 _ —♦— L���N
F,P&M o �-flGURE 2-RESULTS OF rHLORIDE TESTING DURING
SHORT TERM PUMP TEST (5/6/86 .& 4/7/86)
VV HP RA-IF, Vne
ft
_r ICSL:x
q�io 4/rr 90 40 4/14 X16 4616 4117 1/6 4/14 qf20 9/?I 4/?? IZ3 4124 9/?5
l
330
p
270.-
z
U 210 -
0
v
0
� l50
V
90 _
3b
FIGURES;RESULTS OF CHLORIDE TESTING DURING
F,P&.M ° LONG TERM PUMP TEST (9/10187)
V p 0 vo
po
Oar w,bo
o" ° : o° SANDG�AV�L
:. oo•
Of
/!':'N_n •�d!••!� Dia
na HARD PAN
p•o
00
00
. • .,o�
oe SAG RA VF..-
00. :. _ 08
Doo
. .
00 pa
•0 0
6GA L�
NoRI Z � N•T 5.
VERT: !" =10 N
F,P&M FIGURE 4—GEOLOGIC LOG OF PUMP TEST WELL 0 10
VIL,L.AGr ,OF.."GRMENPORT
PROPOS.ED:',.P.L.ANT NOn
CCANWr- PARK
J
JUNE:198't- '
HOLZMACHER, WN and ' MURRELL, P.C...
Consulting Engineers, Environmental Scientists, Architects and Planners
Melville, N.Y. Riverhead, N.Y. Farmingdale, N.Y. • Fairfield, N.J.
y !GROUP
Village Board June 25, 1987
Inc. Village of dreenport Page Eleven
Assuming the saccessfui completion of well 9 at 200
gpm, the approval and implementation of the Costello well at
250 gpm; there is still the need for 2 more similar wells or
one larger well to restore reliable capacity to the needs of
the system.
The incrbase from 2.1 mgd needs in 1986 to the 2.7 mgd
predicted for 1990 will not be in even increments.
Actually, the Village system should be prepared to supply a
maximum day of 2.34 agd in 1987, dependent on weather
conditions.
WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES
None of the above addressees the water needs for fire
protection. Even though it is not expected that a fire will
occur on the maximum domestic day some reserves should be
planned for fire needs on those days. It is more
appropriate in the Greenpdrt situation to provide this in
the 'storage tanks which should be planned soon. Reference
is made to the Master Plan and Quality Report for status of
fire flow conditions throughout the Greenport system.
Reference is made to prior reports for water supply
alternatives. The sources of good quality are still sitting
in the large lakes or ponds. Water nitrate quality
elsewhere is naturally improvings but slowly, in many areas.
Recommendation
For an extended time we have recommended acquisition of
small capacity new well sites in the area of Greenport that
we did not previously believe had a good potential for
supply. The test well performed for Costello by others for
example show that good quality water is available at the
Village edge. This area is aituabod between 2 lakes or
ponds so should have good recharge. Existing water sources
in most directions have shown high concentrations of iron
and manganese but the McCann Park/Costello area appears to
be an exceptidn. It is of course possible that in time and
after extensive permanent well nae; the quality found in the
sources will begin_ to show uphere but the tests to date do
not indicate a problem.
:GROUP
Village Board June 25, 1987
Inc. Village of Greenport Page Twelve
It is recommended that approval be sought for a
capacity of 250 g.p.m. either from the existing Costello
well or from a new well constructed about 50 feet south of
the Costello well. This plant would be designated Plant 10.
Plant 10 Recommendations
As previously stated the proposed 250 g.p.m. capacity
approval would be obtained from either a new well to be
constructed on the Village of Greenport property or from the
existing Costello well some 50 feet northerly. The new well
would be constructed with 47 feet of 8 inch casing and 10
feet of 6" stainless steel screen. In either case it is
proposed that a more cost effective pumping system be
installed to take auction from the well with a self priming
centrifugal pump driven by a 20 AP horizontal electric
motor. A foot valve in the pump suction line and an
automatic water priming connection would be provided.
Treatment would by hypochlorite with future provision for
caustic or soda ash added treatment for pH adjustment.
The well pump, electrical and treatment equipment would
be housed in a one story small prefab type metal or wooden
structure. The water from the well would be metered with a
propelled totallizing type meter in the piping within the
Pump station.
Water would be delivered to the existing 10 inch main
on Moore's Lane which in turn is connected to the nearby
300,000 gallon storage tank.
The estimated cost of this project is $125,000 as shown
on Exhibit A.
The plant could begin operation within 9 months.
Respectfully submitted.
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C.
C. McLen on. E.
SCM:mo
HOLIMACHE&MCLENDON i MURREU,►.C.
TABLE 1
COSTELLO TEST WELL
INC t_VILLAGE OF c;PxENPoRT
WATER QUALITY RESULTS
Sample Time Period
Parameter 30 Min. 3Hrs. 6= 24 Mrs .
Iron 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04
Manganese <0.02 <0.02 <0.2 <0.02
Chloride 7.0 • 7.0 10.0 11.0
Complete Water Quality Survey (Based on 6 Nr. Sample)
Parameter Result
Aldicarb < 2.
Nitrate 0.5
Nitrite < 0.1
Ammonia < 0.2
pH 6.2
Spec. Cond. 160.
Calcium 10.8
Magnesium 4.5
hardness 45.5
Sodium 6.5
Turbidity < 1.00
Total Solids 110.
Color < 5.00
Results for Pesticides Analysis
Compound -ug/1
lindane < 0.03
heptachlor < 0.03
aldrin < 0.03
heptachlor epoxide < 0.03
dieldrin < 0.04
endrin < 0.06
o,P'-DDT < 0.07
P.P'-DDT < 0.09
methoxychlor < 1.0
toxaphene < 2.5
chlordane < 0.5
ALL RESULTS REPORTED MEET NEW YORK STATE DRINKING WATER LIMITS.