Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Macari at Laurel 1991 Book II
Cb BOOK 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR MACARI AT LAUREL TYPE I ACTION This Document Represents A Draft Environmental Impact Statement For The Above Referenced Project. Copies Are Available For Public Review And Comments At The Offices Of The Lead Agency. Comments Will Be Accepted Until IN ACCORDANCE WITH: Article 8 Environmental Conservation Law (8-0113) Part 617 Statewide Regulations (6 NYCRR) DATE: March, 1991 LEAD AGENCY: APPLICANT: Southold Town Planning Board Joseph Macari Town Hall, 53095 Main Road c/o Peter S. Danowski, Esq. Southold, New York 11971 616 Roanoke Avenue Contact Person: Riverhead, New York 11901 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Phone: 516-765-1938 PREPARED BY: LOCATION: The Clover Corporation Bounded by Sound Avenue-Middle P.O. Box C Road on the north and Laurel Way Halesite, N.Y. 11743 (R.O.W. ) on the south Contact Persons: in Laurel, Town of Southold, Richard A. Jackson, Ph.D. Suffolk County, New York Ellen Lopez, M.S. Phone: 516-754-3415 ACCEPTANCE DATE: COMMENT DATE: .uN 17 in TABLE OF CONTENTS BOOK I - D.E.I.S. TEXT SUN24ARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S-1 I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 III . EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF PROPOSED SITE . . III-1 A. PHYSICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 1. GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 2. TOPOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 3 . SOILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-5 B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-14 1. FLORA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-14 2 . FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-30 C. HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-43 1. DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-43 2 . GROUNDWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-44 WATER QUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-56 3 . SANITARY WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-64 4 . WATER BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-65 D. MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-73 1. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-73 2 . SOLID WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-73 3 . ZONING, LAND USE, AND PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-75 ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-75 LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-80 PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE III-82 4. TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-85 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-87 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-88 5. CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-93 CULTURAL RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-93 HISTORICAL RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-93 SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-101 6. HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-102 i 7 . POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-103 8 . MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 . . . . . . . . . . . III-104 9 . TAXES AND FISCAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-104 10. NOISE AND AIR POLLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-106 IV. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1 A. PHYSICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-2 1. TOPOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-2 2 . SOILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-5 B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-6 1. FLORA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-6 FRESHWATER WETLANDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-7 2 . FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-8 C. HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-18 1. DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-18 2 . GROUNDWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-19 3 . SANITARY WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-27 4 . WATER BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-36 D. MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-41 1. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-41 2 . SOLID WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-42 3 . ZONING, LAND USE, AND PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-43 ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-43 LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-43 PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-44 4 . TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-45 5. CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-51 CULTURAL RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-51 HISTORICAL RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-51 SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-52 6. HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-53 7 . POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-54 8 . MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 . . . . . . . . . . . IV-55 9. TAXES AND FISCAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-56 10. NOISE AND AIR POLLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-58 ii V. MITIGATIVE MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . V-1 A. PHYSICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-4 1. TOPOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-4 2 . SOILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-12 B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-14 1. FLORA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-14 FRESHWATER WETLANDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-19 2 . FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-23 C. HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-31 1. DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-31 2 . GROUNDWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-35 3 . SANITARY WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-41 4 . WATER BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-48 D. MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-50 1. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-50 2 . SOLID WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-52 3 . ZONING, LAND USE, AND PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-54 4 . TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-57 5. CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-59 6. HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-61 7. POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-62 8. MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 . . . . . . . . . . . V-63 9 . TAXES AND FISCAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-65 10. NOISE AND AIR POLLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-65 VI. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-1 A. TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-1 B. FLORA AND FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-2 C. GROUNDWATER AND SEWAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-3 D. SOLID WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-4 E. TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-4 F. PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-4 G. SCENIC RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-5 iii H. MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-6 VII. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1 A. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-1 B. YIELD ALTERNATIVE (27 Housing Units Distributed Throughout The Site) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-3 C. LAND ACQUISITION POTENTIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-19 D. TRANSFER DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-22 VIII. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-1 IX. GROWTH-INDUCING ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . IX-1 X. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-1 XI. GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-1 XII. REFERENCES CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R-1 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE: 1. Site Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-2 2 . Soil Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-6 3 . Vegetation Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-15 4. Geologic Cross-Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-47 5. Hydrogeologic Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-48 6. Location of Monitoring Wells (Test Holes) at the Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-51 7. Groundwater Divide - North Fork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-53 8. Groundwater Elevation Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-54 iv 9 . Location of Quality of Groundwater Data Collection Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-59 10. Nearest SCWA Water Main Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-74 11. Zoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-76 12 . Land Use Plan Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-81 13 . Existing Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-90 14 . Tax Levy 1989-1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-105 15. Traffic Volume Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-48 16a. Cumulative Impacts of Residential Development in Town of Southold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-2 16b. Cumulative Residential Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-3 17. Traffic Volume - Cumulative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X-37 TABLE: 1. Water Quality Data - Well #S 53333 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-60 2 . Water Quality Data - Pesticides, VOC'S . . . . . . . . . . . . III-62 3 . Zoning District Schedule - Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . III-77 4 . Zoning District Schedule - Non-Residential . . . . . . . . III-79 5. Median Value of Chemical Constituents of Stormwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-22 6. I.T.E. Trip Generation Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-46 7 . Comparison of the Proposed Action and Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-2 PLATE: 1. Site Plans - Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In Pocket 2 . Site Plans - Yield Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . In Pocket V BOOK II - D.E.I.S. TEXT APPENDICES APPENDIX: A. Environmental Documents: 1. Environmental Assessment Form - Part I 2 . SEQRA Determination 3 . Scoping Hearing 4 . New York Natural Heritage & Wildlife Resources 5 . Town of Southold Document - Comments to Original D.E.I.S. B. Cultural Resource Inventory C. Test Holes D. Traffic Study Vi APPENDICES APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS APPENDIX A-1 EAF-I APPEIOIX A / EAF ENYlA9:44WAL ASSESSMENT - PRAT I Project information RCTIC1. This docu~t l! 4eslgned to Assist to determining rhethar trio action proposed may have a significant effect on the envlrcnrrnt. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to Lose questions rill be considered as Dart of the application for approval And may be subject to further verification and puolic revi w. Provias any additional Information you believe Mill be needed to comoleta PARTS 2 and 3. It is 4=*Cteo that ctaeolettoh of VU EAF will be deoendent on information currently available and will not involve eau studies. research or investigatioa. If information rwluirino such additional wort is unava d ole, so indicate and specify each instance. Ul* Of PROJECT: NAVE Allo AOOAESS OF APNEA (Tf nifferent! Joseph Macari AOCAW ANO NAME Of APPLICUT: trees Joseph Macari c/o Peter S. Danowski , ami tsq. uta(PAM 1 tp, 616 Roanoke Avneue PO Box 779 BUSIN.SS JOWNE• reec Riverhead, New York 11901 tata p DESCIttMO!1 Of PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) _ Realty Subdivision ' (PLFASE COMPLETE EAU gUESTInn - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITt DESCRIPTION ' (Physical setting of overall project. bath develooed and undevelooW Areas) 1.• el character of the lana: Geraraily untfors slaps Ganerally uneven and rollinq or lrreqular 2. Present land use: Uroan Industrial •_ . Co.wercial . Suouroan Rural Forest . Agriculture 3. Total acreage of orojeet Area: 63A". Aoerotimate ACrtaga: Presently After Completion Presently After CQMlacion Meadow or B�rlushland 42.9 Acres 27' eras Hater Surface Area 0'2 acres 0•2 &C-1-ra Ad Wood.5 18.6 acres 16. 1cr+as Unvegecated (rock. eertn or fill) •L-Lacres 1,3 _acres Aor/cultural � acres � acres Roads. buildinas Hetlano (Freanrater orand other saved Tidal as oar Articles , surfaces _0 acres 4.4 acr:s =t• Z'S or `•:•L.) _QSAeres 0 �i_ acres 1 a 0 acres 13.5 sf1dr6pe acr:; t• gnat Is -redowrnant sail tyeMM4 1f toe(s) on orajeet sicca' �i�J_��__�_-_•_ _� S. a t.e ;aero zo4rocx outCroloinas an irnlrct sits? t --at is :eotn tc nedroc:' N/A ('n 'get) f A. A;protimspercentage of proposed croject site with %laces: O•lOS ,-$�': 1fl-lit B_%; 1S. or greater b S. 1. Is project contiguous to. or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? - - ,res No A. What is the; depth to the water table? 0 fat Min. 40' Max. !. Oo bunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal 1►es X No 10. Ooea project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is ldentified as threatened or _endangered • res Y_lo, according to • Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms as the project Sita? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. other geological formations • Yes _JLMe. (Describe 1 12. Is the project Sint presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation aha • ,�Yes X No. 13. Does the prort site offer or Include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? res No 14. Stmins within or contiguous to project area: None a. Moo of Stream and name of river to which It is tributary 15. lakes. Ponds. Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: wmm Laurel Lake ; b. size (in acres) 29.8 1S. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). "A" Residential / Agriculture 2 story i. PROJECT OESCAIMON 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 63-5 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 33'gcres Initially; 33.6acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 30 d. Length of project. in miles: N/A (if aoprapriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing. indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square fooc- age developed acreage N/A f. Number of off-stmt parsing spaces existing 0 ; proposed _ 54 q. Maximum vehicular trios generated par hour 8 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: :he Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial 27 _ Ultimata 2_ 1. If: Orientation :!eignbornaod-City-Regional Estimated Emaloyment Commercial Industrial J. Total height of tallest nranosea struc:4re 2. Now ruck natural material (i.s. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the site • 0 tons 0 cuoic yards. ]. Nor rant acres of veQecation (trees. shrubs. ground coven) will be ren.oved fro. sits - 17.8acrss. d. Mill any mature fore%; (over 190 years old) or other locallyinportant vegetation be reeoved oy this project? ___.Yes A No S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? —2—Yes '.o t. It tingle phase project: Anticipated period of construction __months. (including demolition). 7.• If saulti•phased project: a. Total aumber of phases anticipated No. b. Anticioeted date of cose■ancamrnt phase Month ear (including dowel ition) e. Approximate eomolation date final phase month year. d. Is phase i financially dependent as subsooiaeat anises? To$ No rl. Mill blasting occur during construction? Yes _LNG !. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50 ; after project is comolete 0 . 10. llsmder of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes Y 0. If yes. sxplann: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal levelv"d? X Yes !b. to. U44m. indicate type of waste (some". industrial. etc.) Sanitary Saw-, e c. It surface disposal name of stream Into which efflueat milt bt discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes. ponds.'streams, bays or other surface waton:ays be increased or decreased by proposal? • Yes -L—No. lt. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yas 1-40 15. a. Does project Involve disposal of solid waste? X vies No b. It Yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? —L_Yss 'ro -C. If yes. give name: Southnld_ Tn_I Andfijl}eation fiitrhnTe d. ISM any wastes not go into a sewage disposal systsu or into a sanitary landfill? Yes X No 16. Mill project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes No Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (Mor" than one hour oar day)? _ Yes �_ho it. Will project produce ooersting noise exceeding the local amosenee noise levels? _ Yes _X vo 19. 4111 project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes 40. If yes. Indicate types) Electric 20. It water suooly 1s from wells Indicate ousarng capacity 10 gals/minute. 21. total anticipated water usage per ay 8 10�_mals/day. 22. jpntng: A. What is dominant zoning Classification of site? A" Residential/AarirulturP b. Current soecific zoning classification of sits C. :s pr0oOsed use Consistent with present toning? Y e s d. If no. indicate deli nd zoning N/A •i- 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes —!—NO b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes —1. No C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes$ No) (Type) (Data) (Date) City. Toa. Village Board Y._ n city. Tor". village Planning Board _�, — City. Tor". Zoning Board ._n city. County Health Dep� H . Other local alencles l• M n ---- Other regions agencies -4- _ — State Agencies -- Federal Agendas C. IIIPOWMTICOL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there ars or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. please discuss such Impacts and the measures which can be .takes to sitigato or avoid them. ►hE AMPS SIGMTURS: Young & Young TM9: Land Surveyor RURESUITINQ Joseph Macari DATT. 01/14/88 .4. APP"-MTX 9 — SHOAT S M1,tC?M a,XL ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRM*TTON 9 r (a) In order to answer the questions in this short SAF is is assumed that tha ppreparer will use currenzly available information concerning the project and zhe likely Impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research or other Investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any questioa'has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmental Assessment lrorm is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is .nor significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. W111 project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? . . . . . . . . . . . . V_ Yes No 2. W111 there be a major change to any unique or =usual land form ound on.the site? . . . . . Yes 3• W111 project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . . . . . . . . . . — Yee' ✓ No 1.. Will project have a potentially large impact oa groundvater quality? . . . . '. . . . . . . . _ Yes No S. Will project significantly effect drainage flow ou adjacent sites? . . . . . . Tee ✓ No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered � plant or animal species? . . . . . . , . . �_ Yes No 7* Will pro act result in a rA jor adverse effect on • air quality? . . . .'. . . . . . . . Yea No 8. Will project have a major effect on visual charw actor -of the community or acetic viers or vistas Mhown to be important to the community? . . . _ Tea No 9. Will projectadverselyimpact any size or struct— ure of historic, pre—historic, or paleontological , lstporrance or any sits designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? . . . Yea V/ So 10. Will project have a major efZect on existing or future recreational opportunitl+s? . . . Yes '� No 11. Will project result in major t—atf:c problems or cause a major effecz to existing transportation ✓ systems? Yes Yo 12. Will p:rject regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb-• ance as a resulz of the project's operation.? Yes � Vc 13. Will prosect have any impact on public health or V safety? . . . . . . . . . . . a Yes No lL. 411_'1 project affect the existing coomunlzy by directly causing a i:vw:M :a permanent pc-pt:y— zicn of more than. S perzenz over a an.—year period Cr have a xa;cr negazite ef:ac: on :`e c!,araczer of %he cammurizy :r neiinto.rnzod? . 'is v: 15. Is inert publi ccntrovtrzy concar..:a; . a ;.rata::'! ':as ✓ ::c s:c:1.t::R=: _ Land Surveyor sin===rT-�rc: Joseph Maca C;,-_; 01/28/88 .r E4F VIVIAOIKKAL ASSESSMENT PART III IVAUAT 0:! OF T14E 14r41R I'iCE OF IMPACT I7FOitNATIiIti ' - Part 7 is prepared If one or mart impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. • TM amount of writing necessary to answer Part ] may be detarmined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasomaaleness of qr decisions? tlLST'RNCTIOMS Complete the follwinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of part 2: I. Briefly describe the fagact. 2. Oeseribe (if aoolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large Imoact by a pro_ Ject Mange. �. Based an tM Inforsetion available, decldo 1f It is reasonable to conclude that this i"ct Is i_rta_t to the municipality (city. toss or tillage) to which the project is located. To amww the question of importance. consider: - The probability of the impact or effect.occurring - The duration of the impact or effect • Its irreversibility. Including permenentty lost resources er values - YMther the Impact or effect can w controlled - The regional consequence of the int+ ct or effsct - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the project apply to this Impact or effect. DMWIIiATI4N OF SIMIFICAflCE a M action is considered to be significant 1f: Ane (or wore) Imoact is deteruined to both taro and its (t.�etr) wnseouence. based on the warier above. is imoortlnc. -PART III STATE'VITS (Continue on Attachments. as needed) _ii_ SMALL TA POTE.YTIaL CAR IMPACT CE MODERATE LA?GE REDJCEO V IMPAR I"PAR PROJECT CHARGE IMPAR ON r'iEAGy lt. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CON"ITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR h0 YES ESERRYSUPPLY? ...........................................00 Examles that Would Apply to Column t Project causing Greater than it increase in any fors of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or eecansion of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two famrily residences. other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 1S. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIDIUIBLE ODORS. NOISE. GLARE. YIBRATInn !10 YES or ELECTRICAL OISTURBAACE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0 0 Exec la that Would Aooly to Colurm 2 /lasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. 'Mors will occur routinely (more than ane hour per day). Project rill Produce operating noise eacaedina the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will reeavt natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NEALTH t MA74RDI W YES 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC 11EALTH AHO SAFETY? .............0 O Exp that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil. Pasticidos. chemicals. radiation. ecc.) in the event of accident or unset conditions. or there •ill be a chronic law level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of -hasar+dous Mantes' (i.e. toaic. poisonous. highly reactive. radioactive. irritating. infectious. etc.. including Mantes that are solid, ami-solid. liquid or contain gases.) Storeas facilities for one million or More valinns of lioui H ed natural gas or other liouids. Other imoaets: ��_ - !• LL 11 74i. wL CA.% •M w 7 &E OEAAU LARwst REOUCa aT ,:PACT RIPAC- PROJECT CHANU I*PACS T On Pj2L%Jr11 ANO CyAUCTfa OF CC!!1P!41Tv 32 4F1r3P P-_^f) 11. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPA4M. 3 ^F THE EXISTING 40 YES CC"4llIITY? ................................................0 O Exaeole that Would Apoly to Cohen 2 _ The population of the City. Torn or Village in which Goa Project Is located is likely to gran by more than SS of resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital etpenditures or opera- ting services will Increase by more than SZ per year as a result of this project. Jill Involve any atrmantat facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove areae agricultural Ian" from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities. —" structures or areas of historic importance to the gnxmety. Development Mill induce an Influx of a particilar age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more anloyses In one or Bort businesses. Other tomacts: NO YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CaKTACVFRSY COYCERMIMA THE PWIJECT? .....,.0 O Exanoles that Would Apply to Colw.ae 2 Elthe; government or•citizens of adjacent communities have exaressad ooaosit:on or relec:ad the proeeet or nave not been contacted. Objections to the Project from within the conVnity. IF ANT ACTION ill PART 2 IS IDEIITIFIED AS A MTEUTiAL l+lRQ 110PACT :R If YOU CA"T OETE10113E THE "AG:IITUOC OF Il'IACT. PROCEED TO PART 1. NATIONS OF EAF CC11FLETE0 MR THIS PROjEr: OETE&MINATION PART I PART II PART 1 Upon review of the Information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1. 2 and 1) and considering bola tM aaanitude and lmnortance of ascn Impact. it is reammely determined that: PRE?AAE A wIEZATIV: OICURATICH A. The arojee: cell result in no major imeaets and. tnertfore. 0 is one Mpma ICn may not est significaat Umage :d the enviroent. 9. Althougn :he 7r4loct could have a significant effect on the tnviroamenc. :here •ill not be a significant affect in wits case OREPARE A 'IECUTIYE 1E::A;tAT:C11 r because the aitigatlon measures described in !_.7 1 have bets 0 included as oar: of tae orooased 3ro;ec:. C. The srojec% -*ill result In :no or more Wor adverse iwoec:s PRE?1RE 301:-:7E CE=MAT-133 ;RCC::: '41-A r!S .. :sec cannot se reduced and may taus• sigai!tcant damage :0 ::+ 0 e environment. :a 3gencv iw{recurt if 3-trirtr •1+ :-!f■ren: '-tm rtsoonsi3lt A`••'z�: :r 1'1 _AJC =ienci . 'IC' ►VILL TC PATE!(TIAL CAn II+PACT It mKIGERATE LAAG£ aEOUCM OT 1.4►AC7 I"maCT WJECT CNAnGZ Itner Laacts: f. :RILL PROJCCT ALTER D"IM" "Ig AMPM Ot SURFArl !LATER 30 YES RUMiFT ...................................................OO :awac l• tact ".ould Anply to Colum 2 Protect would innede flood water nws. Project IS likely to cause substantial erosion. Protect Is tncamoatible Ott% westing dratnege patterns. Other insects: 14 YES I. WILL PMJECT AFFECT All OUALITY?...........................0 O ►.+utiles =4% liquid Aptly to Column 2 Project will Induce 1.x00 or anus V"Icle trips to any givee hour. :reject will result 14 tae Incineration of more tam 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project e.isslon rate of all contandaaets .ill oacaed S lbs. oar hour or a heat source onducing rare than 10 ofllloo STU'S pre how. , "A" IN IR sNTS ANO ANtl'af S l 'A YES It. WILL ►RCJECT AFFECT AIRY TMREATmu 01 ENOANFFR© SPECIES? 00 sawolte that World Apoly to Column 2 Reduction of ane or non species listed on the New Tort or Federal list. wing the site. over or near site or found an the site. Removal of ear portion of a critical or 1/enlficant wild- .� 11 h MOlt1t- Aoolicatlnn of Pesticide or 4e id de over earn than _ tholes a yearother Hiss fora1"xw%ur2l purposes. 9t1tr Itroacts: f. VILL MACY SUSSTUTIALLYAFFECr RMMTHREATEI© OR No YES EOWSEAEO SPECIES? .......................................0 0 ,a.ole that Would Aooly to Column Project would suostant/ally laterfen witn'any resident or migratory fisa or wildlife totcits. Project reeuires the removal of more than M acres of mature forest (over 1p years to ant) ar atrer localiv important vegetation. 1. 2. 3. SMALL I'll °CTENIAL CL: I:PACT AL ' JEdATE LARGE REDUCED aY I-PACT i"raCIr P_RAJECT C!vr;5? � f"^aR C: "ITM arr:?..RCE 11. DILL TK ODNECT AFrC; vivit. VISTAS em T.If VISPAL 'A YE! C)'A4ACTER OF THE IiFIG16/11!a1o0 AR CD"'.IIT+? .............. O asenlel that %,amid Asply to Column 2 An incoaeatible visual affect Cawed Or the tntnshutina of now materials. colors and/or fame to contrast to the surrowidine lanoscage. A oroject easily visible. not easily sereened.t:Ut is obviously different fres nthvrs around It. Project will result to the altr•inatton or major screening of seanle views or vistas known to be Important to the area. r Other Impacts: IMPACT on HISTORrc RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT 111PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF NISTOAIC. RO YES PRE-NI-TrADIC bR PALMOTDtiICSL IMPTAMCE? ................00 zamol• that Gould Aeoly to Calurn 2 v Preject occurine wholly or aartially within or contiquous to any faeillty or site. listed an the national Aeoistar of historic slaws. Aev lagact to an archeological site or fossil Aad locaud within the project sits. other tao4cu: INPACT nM QPFN SPACF S RECRfATTOM iZ. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTIM MO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREMOMAL OPPOAT1e1ITIEST....•• O O :a.oles that Would Apply to Colune 2 The pomanont foreclosure of a future recreational odoartualty. �• A major reduction of an open space important to the coAwaity. other leoacts: ["04CT nN MANIM4TATT011 13. KLL THERE AE AM EFFECT TO EXISTING TRAMSPORTATI(IN No YES SYSTM? ............................................... O O Ea�oi*s :Gat Would Annly to Coban 2 Alteration of ;resent sattarns of rovenent of neople and/or goods. Project will result it severe trsffit .1roolems. Jtner iaaac:s: .q. EAF EAYIX WEIITAL ASSESSMEXT - PART II Proieet Imoacts and Their MW..Itude General tnfa.-.etion (Rmd CAnfully) , - In eopleting tna form the reviewer should be guided by the question: }lava moy decisions and determinations been rets�e: The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environment&) analyst. -•Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not moue that it is also necessarily Vqn1ficant. any largr dfeet ant be.evsluatsd in PART 1 to determine significance.• By identifying an s ee�f t-i—columw 2 sie01y asks that It be looked at further. - The Exaeoles provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally goallcable throughout tilt State and for most situations. Out. for any specific project or site other eaw Ales and/or lower thresnalds• may be more aparopriate for a Pacential large Impact rating. - Each project. an each sits, to each locality. will vary. Therefore. the exaoples have been offered as guidance. They do not conscituta an exhaustiv# list of lmopscti and thresholds to answer each Question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. IIeSTX=IGM (Read Carefully) . a. Ansawr sack of the 18 question in PART 2. Answdr Yes It there will be = effect. b. w ez assurers should be const4wed as Y_ answers. C. If answering its to a question thea shack the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential •size of the imact. It impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example. check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the sits of the impact tgcn consider ane impact as potentially large and procee0 to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude. place a Yes to column 1. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is not possible. SHALL TO POT'FIITIAL CAN IMPACT 9E MOOERATF LARGE REDUCED or [lpACT iI�PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPAR ON LAhO No YCS 1 WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESIA,T OF A PHYSICAL CNAIIGE TO O O PR3JE? SITE? Exp_les that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Any construction on 11cpes of 151 or greater. (15 toot rise her 1170 foot of lengtnl. or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10:. Construct!on an Land were the dept to the water taale is less than I toot. ronstruetion of caved parkin are• rnr 1.''^ or mare vehicles. �• _ Construction on Isnd where bedrock is exposed or generally .titin I feet Of existing ground surface. Coes.rue 022 tnar will continue for more than 1 Year or involve mo;re than one -!as* or stage. Eicavation or -Pim-nq dumases chat would remove more ;nan 1,000 eons cf natural n::en al (i.e. rock or soil) per rear. Canscrae:ion Of any new sanitary 14n4f111. i. 2. 3. !'ALL '0 POTEMIL CA.r iVAC' 3E OERATE LxRGZ MU:q 3Y rwiarT MMIC? DROJECT Cuxgr,t Cattsirvetl0n In a designated fl aadr•y. Other impacts: --•— —_. . 2. WILL THEM 2E AN EFFECT TO Any UnIOuE 9R UNUSUAL LA.w1 Fn � YES FOUn0 ON THE SITE? (i.e. cllff>,. dunes. 4&alo91ea1 foray (vN`J1 tsons. act.) Sneeifie land foray: IMPACT WATER 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT An UITEI BODY DESIGNATED AS ...........)M TES PROTECTED? (Under Articles IS. 24. ZS of tae Envir. on"Atal Conservation Law. E.C.I.) O Ex-181 that Jould Apply to Cplwto 2 Dredgiaa avn than 109 cubic yards of mocarial from Clanael of a protected scrsaa. Construction in a designated frnsawat&r or tidal wetland. Omer Impacts: ' a. WILL 11110JEC' AFFECT All nOn-PROTEC'EO EXISTIVs OR Mra NO YEE — $CDT OF MATER? ............................................� O E:+l_s that Would Apply to Column 2 AIN increase or decrease In the surface area of any body It water or .tore titan a 10 acre lacn&se or decrease. i —'O'Canstruettal'Vr a body of water that &xeeeds ID acres of surface arm. Other (.,acts: S. '+:LL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR 42OU-404ATEII troll TT' TES • E.a,0l_s that !ould Apply to ColwM 2 O Pm;ec: will ratusre a discharge permit. Py:K: rMiras use Of A tour:& Of watar mac does no: have 100rOv41 :0 serve pr0oosed prolec:. 3-0:t:: rvautres .•:ar suoaly from wells mica nrsacer 'AAA 'S vItpat car shute oumaing capaei:y. Czrstric:ton 7r accretion causing any tDnclntnatlan Of a Ot.Olie w•:ar %wooly system. ._ PrO:ec: mill &aversely affect: Inunowac&r. Ltaura eratuent mill :a "anveyed aft tla sl:& :0 ale•Ittles .alta presently 10 IOC axis: ar nave 'natecuat& :Aoac:cy. 2"1:e:: rtautrTog a aaetlr:y :e&: .oul'e use .+cle• In t..cass :f :n,M;C ;allant .or ca.. _ '" :t:: +r:' It.eri :xuxa 0 1:J:'on ;r .re• .iscnaro ta:en: :,a: alere c:nuts: APPENDIX A-2 SEQRA DETERMINATION Town Hall, 53095 Main Road O �. P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 11971 1 ('`� i ! -77 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 Peter S. Danowski,Jr. P.O. Box 779 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Joseph Macari SCTM #1000-121-4-9 Dear Mr. Danowski: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board issue a Positive Declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Planning Board, as lead agent, determined that the proposed action described in the enclosed positive declaration may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statment will be prepared. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very, truly yours, �/z ORLO SK JR.� CHAIRMAN enc. jt , 1 r Ay Ul Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ' Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7 , 1989 POSITIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT to Part 617 of Article 8 of the Environmental Conser- vation Law, the Southold Town Planning Board assumes lead agency, and, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed actions described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared. NAME OF ACTION: A.T. Holding Co. SCTM# 1000-121-5-5. 1 1000-122-2-25 34 lots on 91 . 53 acres. Joseph Macari SCTM# 1000-121-4-9 27 lots on 63 . 57 acres. Peconic Homes SCTM# 1000-121-3-7 1000-121-1- p/o 5 19 lots on 45 .28 acres. Daniel Jacoby SCTM# 1000-125-1-5 2 lots on 10. 58 acres. Douglas Miller SCTM # 3.000-121-4-10 . 1 3 lots on 8. 2 acres. SEQRA STATUS: Each of the individual actions around the Lake is, in effect, an unlisted action, but the cumulative effect is akin to a Type I action. **CONTINUED** REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: There are three major and two minor subdivision proposals which together encompass approximately 219 acres and 85 lots in the vicinity of Laurel Lake; and There should be consideration of the potential cumulative effect of the proposed development on the ecology of the area with regard to the overall impacts on groundwater quality, surface water quality, wildlife habitat, and public lands; and The Laurel Lake area has been under study as a special groundwater protection area by the Long Island Regional Planning Board' s Special Groundwater Protection Area Advisory Council; and The stretch of Sound Avenue between Bergen Avenue to the west and Cox Neck Road to the east is the sole point of ingress and egress, and none of these subdivisions has additional access to other public roads. This stretch of road is a heavily travelled east-west corridor and also a curving road on hilly terrain. Its capacity to handle safely the additional volume of traffic from the projected development should be examined. CONTACT PERSON• Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation,SB Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Planning Board Applicant it APPENDIX A-3 SCOPING HEARING 4 CERTIFIED MAIL To. All involved Applicants FROM: Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr . Chairman Southold Town Punning Board RE: Scoping Outline for the DEIS on Peconic Homes SCTM #1000-121-5-5 . 1 Douglas Miller SCTM #1000-121-4-10 .1 DanielJacoby SCTM #1000-125-1-5 Joseph Macari SCTM #1000-121-4-9 A.T. Holding SCTM #1000-121-5-8 DATE: August 18, 1989 Enclosed please find the scoping outline for the above referenced projects. The attached document constituts the outline of what must be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact for the above referenced actions. All actions must be addressed in one comprehensive document, as outlined herein, due to the potential for cumulative impacts. As this DEIS is to address five projects in a cumulative manner, it is imperative that we receive an indication as to your intentions of completing this document. Accordingly, we are requesting verification of your intent, in the form of a certified letter, indicating whether or not you intend to pursue the individual application referenced above and if you are going to participate inthe preparation of the comprehensive DEIS. Please forward your responses by certified mail, in order to ensure the most efficient handling of the correspondence. We must receive your response by September 1, 1989 , or we will assume that you do not wish to exercise the option of preparing the DEIS and this agency shall terminate review of your Drolect in conformance with 6 NYCRR Part 617 . 8( a) . Please contact the office if there is any questions with the above. cc: Howard Young Dr. Jackson, letter and scoping outline DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING OUTLINE for the Laurel Luke Study Area Southold, New York INTRODUCTION: This document was compiled using the Scoping Checklist contained within 6 JVYCRR Part 617. 21 Appendix D, and as a result of a scoping meeting held July 13, 1989 at the Town of Southold Town Hall for the following actions: Peconic Homes SCTH #1000-121 -5-5. 1 Douglas Afiller SCTH #1000-121-4-10. Daniel Jacoby SCTH #1000-125-1-5 Joseph Hacari SC'TA%f #1000-121-4-9 A. T. Holding Co. SCTH x1000-1 21-5-5. 1 The purpose of this document is to identify the basic topic areas which must be addressed in the DEIS. Tonics which require detailed discussion are so noted. This document will be used, in conjunction with Part 617. 14, co review the proposed DEIS with regard to scope and adequacy at the time if submission to the lead agency. In addition, as the action includes five Projects, with potentia! cttmerlative effects, relevant sections of Part 617. 15 will also be utilized in the review. For the purposes of this scoping document the area containing the five above actions will be referred to as "the Project site " and the five actions will be referred as "the Project ". It is recognized that a significant amount of information may have already been compiled, in connection with one or more of the actions. It is advisable utilize this information and expand on it, where appropriate, to adequately address the Potential impacts. The information must be presented in a single comprehensive document for the Purposes of fulfilling the rules and regulations of SEA conjunction with this positive declaration. R in FRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 1 of 13 :NVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area SCOPING OUTLINE: I . Cover Sheet The EIS shall begin with a cover sheet that includes : A. That this is a draft statement B. Name or other descriptive titles of the project C. Location (county and town) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS G. In the case of a Draft EIS , the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II . Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS and Final EIS 's . The summary should include : A. Brief description of the actions and project as a whole . B. Significant , beneficial and adverse impacts , ( issues of controversy must be specified ) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternative( s ) considered E. Matters to be decided (permits , approvals , funding ) III . Description of the Proposed Action A. PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1 . Background and history 2 . Public need for the project , and municipality objectives based on adopted community developments plans 3 . Objectives of the project sponsors 4 . Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic B. LOCATION 1 . Establish geographic boundaries of the project ( use of regional and local scale maps is Page 2 of 13 CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area recommended) 2 . Description of access to site 3 . Description of existing zoning of site C . DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1 . Composite map of pending actions a) proposed layouts b) Suffolk Cty. Tax Map No ' s . 2 . Estimated site data a ) proposed impervious surface area ( roofs , parking lots , roads ) b ) amount of land to be cleared c ) open space 3 . Structures , proposed number and layout 4 . Proposed drainage systems 5 . Sewage Disposal 6 . Water Supply D. CONSTRUCTION 1 . Construction a) total construction period anticipated b) schedule of construction c ) future potential development , on site( s ) or on adjoining properties d ) Suggested protection methods E. APPROVALS 1 . Required changes or variances to the zoning regulations 2 . ether permit approval or funding requirements including but not limited to : - Town - County - State IV. Environmental Setting Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1 . Surface a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil characteristics examples : - physical properties ( indication of soils capabilities and or limitations ) c ) agricultural soil properties - list soils by name , slope and soil CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 3 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area group ranking within NYS Land ( 1 NYCRR 370 ) number of acres within each group d ) distribution of soil types at Project site - location of soils on map e ) suitability for use examples : - agriculture - recreation - construction f ) subsoil discussion 2 . Topography a) description of topography at project site examples : - slopes - prominent or unique features b ) slope analysis ( example ; 0-10%, 10-20% , 520% ) c ) description of existing drainage areas , patterns and channels B. WATER RESOURCES 1 . Groundwater (detailed discussion) a) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples : - depth of water table - seasonal variation - quality - quantity - direction & velocity of flow b) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples : - location of existing wells - public/private water supply - industrial uses - agricultural uses c ) studies and reports - Special Groundwater Protection :area (LIRPB) - Water Advisory Committee of the Town of Southold - North Fork Water Supply Study 2 . Surface water b) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters d ) discussion of potential for flooding , siltation, erosion and eutrophication of CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 4 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area water supply C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1 . Vegetation (detailed discussion ) a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples : - species presence and abundance - age - size - distribution - dominance - community types - unique , rare and endangered species - value as habitat for wildlife - productivity Z . Wildlife (detailed discussion) a) list of wildlife species on the project site and within surrounding area, including migratory and resident species b) discussion of wildlife population characteristics examples : - species presence and abundance - distribution - dominance - unique , rare and endangered species - productivity 3 . Wetlands (detailed discussion) a) list and map wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b) discuss wetland characteristics examples : - acreage - vegetative cover - classification - benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control , recreation c ) location and description of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples : - seasonal variation - quantity - classification according to New York State Department of Health ( if appropriate ) CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 5 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area d ) discussion of Potential for flooding , siltation, erosion and eutrophication Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1 . Transporting services ( detailed discussion by a professional traffic engineer) a ) description of the size , capacity and condition of services examples : - roads - intersections - traffic control - access/egress from site b) description of current level of and use of services examples : - a. m. and P. m. Peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mix - source of existing traffic - accident history - capacity analysis B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1 . Existing land use and zoning a ) description of the existing land use of the Project site and the surrounding area within a quarter of a mile of the site examples : - commercial - residential - agricultural - business - retail - industrial - vacant b) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 2 . Land use Plans (detailed discussion) a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b) discussion of future development trends or Pressures c ) plans to be discussed , but not limited to : - Town Master Plan - 208 Study W t Page 6 of 13 CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area - NURPS - North Fork Water Supply - Suffolk County Water Authority C. COMMUNITY SERVICE ( for this section include a list of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs ) 1 . Educational facilities 2 . Police protection 3 . Fire protection 4 . Health care facilities 5 . Social services 6 . Recreational facilities 7 . Utilities 8 . Public water supply 9 . Solid waste disposal D. DEMOGRAPHY 1 . Population characteristics a) discussion of existing population parameters examples : - distribution - density - household size and composition b) discussion of projections for population growth E. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1 . Visual resources a) description of the physical character of the community b ) description of natural areas/land use patterns of local visual importance . 2 . Historic and archaeological resources a) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community , or included on Statewide Inventory b) identification of sites having potential significant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey ; to be conducted by qualified archaeologist . V. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Page 7 of 13 CRAMER. VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. The following is a summary of some impacts which maybe potentially large . This list is not meant to be all inclusive , nor is it true that all of these impacts may occur with the proposed project : A. PHYSICAL CHANGE TO THE PROJECT SITE. 1 . impact on soils and topography B. AFFECT ON GROUNDWATER 1 . adverse affect to groundwater a) water quality b) water quantity/availability c) conformance to plans and regulations C. THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1 . reduction of species found on State or Federal list ( if applicable) 2 . loss of habitat and resultant impact on specie D. NON-THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES 1 . interference with residence or migratory 2 . loss of habitat E. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS 1 . level of service 2 . capacity analysis 3 . physical factors - curvature - site distance 4 . access and safety F. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 . availability of services 2 . projected demand G. LAND USE PLANS 1 . compatibility/conformance 2 . existing land use patterns H. CULTURAL 1 . historic 2 . pre-historic 3 . visual and open space VI. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 8 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe measures to reduce or avoid Potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact . Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1 . Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b ) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites c ) design and implement soil erosion control plan 2 . Topography a) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c ) minimize disturbance of non-construction sites B. WATER RESOURCES 1 . Groundwater a) locations of sanitary discharge b) maintain permeable areas on the site c ) landscaping and landscape management plans d ) stormwater controls 2 . Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas - landscaping b) design adequate stormwater control system c ) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal d ) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1 . Vegetation a) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 9 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area b) Preserve Part of site as a natural area c ) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d ) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization 2 . Wildlife a) Provide adequate habitat ( shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b ) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of wildlife cycles c ) wildlife plantings to restore and/or create habitats Duman Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1 . Transportation a ) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b ) install adequate traffic control devices or roadway configurations B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1 . Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans and studies b) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use C . COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 . Police protection a) provide equipment , funds , or services directly to the community 2 . Fire protection a ) provide equipment , funds or services directly to the community 3 . Utilities a ) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c ) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1 . Visual resources CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 10 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area a ) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design b) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses c ) Preservation of existing vegetation 2 . Historic and archaeological resources a) Prepare a plan, including measures to mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restriction of project activities b) develop measures to convey cultural information to the community ( e . g . through scientific/popular reports , displays ) c ) preserve architecturally significant structures and make an adequate permanent Photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed VII . ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI . VII . ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of alternatives with examples . Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of costs , benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible . Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to the left of the topic . A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES ( detailed discussion, can be combined with VII-B below) 1 . Site layout a ) density and location of structures b) location of access routes , parking and Utility routes 2 . Orientation a ) compatibility with slope and drainage CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 11 of 13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS V W1 Ad Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area patterns b) site size and set back requirements 3 . Technology a) pollution control equipment b) innovative vs . proven technologies 4 . Mix of activities a) townhouses b) large lots B. ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT( S ) (discussions and maps ; maps can be conceptual in nature but should provide sufficient detail in order to assess potential impacts and/or desirability of alternative layouts ) 1 . Limiting factors a) availability of land b) suitability of alternative layout to accommodate design requirements c ) suitable market area d) compatibility with local zoning and master plan e) compatibility with regional objectives C. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERATION SCHEDULING 1 . Commence construction at a different time 2 . Phase construction/operation 3 . Restrict construction/operation work schedule D. NO ACTION 1 . Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers ' need c ) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts 2 . Public acquisition of portion and/or total area. a) public need b) public benefit/impact c ) environmental need/benefit/impact IX. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use . X. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS A Page 12 of 13 CRAMER, VOORHIS, &,ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL ND,:PLAUNI, 1G CONSULTANTS V"/// v Scoping Outline Laurel Lake Study Area Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have . Listed below are examples of topics that are typically affected by the growth induced by a project . A. POPULATION 1 . Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing B. SUPPORT FACILITIES 1 . Business and commun4ty service demand created to serve the increased population C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1 . Introduction or improvement of infrastructure ( roads , waste disposal , sewers , water) to service Proposed project 2 . Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infrastructure XI. APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies , reports and information considered and relied on in preparing the statement B. List all federal , state , regional , or local agencies , organizations , consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits ( if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the projects may be included ( required in the Final EIS) Page 13 of 13 CRAMER, VOORHIS, &'/,ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTALAND,PLANNING CONSULTANTS Vad AA APPENDIX A-4 NEW YORK NATURAL HERITAGE & WILDLIFE RESOURCES New York State Department of Environmental Conservation AM Region 1 Headquarters SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11794 vftw ( 516 ) 751-7900 E%T. 248 Thomas C.Jorling Commissioner Hr. Howard J. Ruben The Clover Corporation 271 Hain Street Northport, NY 11768 April 17, 1990 Re : Hacari at Laurel site, Town of Southold, NY Dear Hr. Ruben; We have reviewed the Significant Habitat Program and Natural Heritage Program files with respect to your request of late regarding the above referenced property. We did not identify any potential impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern wildlife species, rare plant, animal or natural community occurrences, or other significant habitats. The absence of data does not necessarily mean that rare or endangered elements, natural communities or other significant habitats do not exist on or adjacent to the proposed site, but rather that our files currently do not contain any information which indicates the presence of these. Our files are continually growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been conducted. For these reasons, we cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be required for environmental assessment. If this proposed project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we can update this response. If we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us. ienior ce ely, ol i ha c e el Wildlife Biologist NODATA.DOC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Information Services 700 Troy-Schenectady Road AM Latham Road, New York 12110-2400 oboe April 25, 1990 Thomas G Joding commiasiow Howard J. Ruben The Clover Corporation 271 Main Street Northport, New York 11768 Dear Mr. Ruben: We have reviewed the Significant Habitat Unit and the NY Natural Heritage Program files with respect to your request for biological informa- tion concerning the Macari at Laurel Site, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. Enclosed is a computer printout covering the area you requested to be reviewed by our staff. The information contained in this report is confidential and may not be released to the public without permission from the Significant Habitat Unit. Our files are continually growing as new habitats and occurrences of rare species and communities are discovered. In most cases, site-specific or comprehensive surveys for plant and animal occurrences have not been con- ducted. For these reasons, we can only provide data which have been as- sembled from our files. We cannot provide a definitive statement on the presence or absence of species, habitats or natural communities. This information should not be substituted for on-site surveys that may be re- quired for environmental assessment. This response applies only to known occurrences of rare animals, plants and natural communities and/or significant wildlife habitats. You should contact our regional office(s), Division of Regulatory Affairs, at the address(es) enclosed for information regarding any regulated areas or permits that may be required (e.g. , regulated wetlands) under State law. If this project is still active one year from now we recommend that you contact us again so that we may update this response. Sincerely, B. Bu f to Encs. Signi an bitat Unit cc: Reg. 1, Fish and Wildlife Office PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR ABOVE CHANGE OF ADDRESS New York Heritage Program is supported in part by The Nature Conservancy Page No. 1 04/25/90 NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM DATABASE REPORT (IR2.frm) RARE PLANTS, ANIMALS, AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES *****CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION***** (refer to Users Guide for explanation) SIZE IN A/Imanim ACRES. C=commun PRECISION YEAR NYS HERITAGE USGS 7 1/2, (0 = SCIENTIFIC COMMON P=plant S=second LAST EO LEGAL FED. GLOBAL/STATE OFFICE CO. TOWN NAME TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LAT. LONG. UNKNOWN) NAME NAME 0=other M=minute OBS. RANK STATUS STATUS RANK USE SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 CARDAMINE LONG'S P M 1924 H U C2 G3G4 S1 4007285 LONGII BITTERCRESS 4 SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 HYPERICUM CREEPING ST. P M 1924 H E G2G3 S1 4007285 ADPRESSUM JOHN'S-WORT 5 SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 LESPEDEZA LESPEDEZA P M 1918 H R G4? S2S3 4007285 STUEVEI 7 SUFF SOUTHAMPTON MATTITUCK 3 COASTAL PLAIN C S 1985 A U G3G4 S2 4007285 POND SHORE 11 SUFF SOUTHAMPTON MATTITUCK 1 UTRICULARIA RUSH P S 1985 B R G5 S2 4007285 JUNCEA BLADDERWORT 11 SUFF SOUTHAMPTON MATTITUCK 1 PSILOCARYA LONG-BEAKED P S 1985 B R G4 S3 4007285 SCIRPOIDES BALD-RUSH 11 SUFF SOUTHAMPTON MATTITUCK 1 ASTER NEMORALIS BOG ASTER P S 1985 All R G5 S2 4007285 11 SUFF SOUTHAMPTON MATTITUCK 1 SCLERIA RETICULATED P S 1985 B R G4TU S3 4007285 RETICULARIS VAR NUTRUSH 11 RETICULARIS SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 OENOTHERA CUT-LEAVED P M 1924 H U G5 S1 4007285 LACINIATA EVENING-PRIMROS 82 E Page No. 2 04/25/90 NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM DATABASE REPORT (IR2.frm) RARE PLANTS, ANIMALS, AND NATURAL COMMUNITIES *****CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION***** (refer to Users Guide for explanation) SIZE IN A/I=anlm ACRES. C=common PRECISION YEAR NTS HERITAGE USGS 7 1/21 (0 = SCIENTIFIC COMMON P=plant S=second LAST EO LEGAL FED. GLOBAL/STATE OFFICE CO. TOWN NAME TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LAT. LONG. UNKNOWN) NAME NAME 0=other M=minute OBS. RANK STATUS STATUS RANK USE SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 PLANTAGO DWARF PLANTAIN P M 1925 H U G5 S1 4007285 PUSILLA 84 SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 RHYNCHOSPORA DROWNED HORNED P M 1958 H E G3G4 S1 4007285 INUNDATA RUSH 86 SUFF SOUTHOLD MATTITUCK 0 SCLERIA FEWFLOWER P M 1949 H T G5T4T5 S) 4007285 PAUCIFLORA VAR NUTRUSH 87 CAROLINIANA New York Natural Heritage Program New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 700 Troy-Schenectady Road 29 January 1991 Latham, New York 12110-2400 (518) 783-3932 Ms. Ellen Lopez Clover Corp. 271 Main St. Northport, NY 11768 Dear Ms. Lopez, Here is the information you requested. Some of the information that was not in the computer I have written out from collector's notes. I hope this information will be of help. Sincerely, Stephen M. Yo ng Botanist New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and The Nature Conservancy with support from Return a Gift to Wildlife contributions _�lcl-e �i /�'GJ�C� IC`Yt� VL�+v' C (�IrG �(VIiC(ll(j I GE 1 14 : 54 : 55 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 [CYPOROGI*001*NY FAA MAINTAINED ANDROPOGON GRASSLAND AROUND TOWERS. SOME OPEN SANDY AREAS. T"ICYPOROGI*002*NY ROUND, SHALLOW PD WITH WOODS CLEARED FROM MARGIN. I [CYPOROGI*003*NY DRY WOODS I-rICYPOROGI*004*NY PMCYPOROGI*005*NY DISTURBED GRASSLAND WITH MANY DIRT BIKE TRAILS. I CYPOROGI*006*NY CYPOROGI*007*NY PMCYPOROGI*008*NY OPEN DAMP SAND [CYPOROGI*009*NY [CYPOROGI*010*NY BORDER OF PINE BARREN PMCYPOROGI*011*NY HEMPSTEAD PLAINS nMCYPOROGI*012*NY ICYPOROGI*013*NY HEMPSTEAD PLAINS —ICYPOROGI*014*NY HEMPSTEAD PLAINS PMCYPOROGI*015*NY DRY SANDY CLEARING Records Processed L--GE 1 14 : 51: 05 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ] iONAOCOQO*001*NY PDONAOCOQO*002*NY DRY HILL T )ONAOCOQO*003*NY DRY SANDY FIELD ] IONAOCOQO*004*NY SANDY EMBANKMENT I-JONAOCOQO*005*NY PDONAOCOQO*006*NY ] IONAOCOQO*007*NY l iONAOCOQO*008*NY HIGHLY HERB DOMINATED EARLY SUCCESSIONAL FIELD Records Processed �c �t rt c, rtC (_c Lk kr i's ,GE 1 14 : 49 : 47 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I [CYPOROKI*001*NY UPPER EDGE OF SALT MARSH, OPEN AND SEDGY. PMCYPOROK3*001*NY VERY SHALLOW PD W/ EXCELLENT EXPOSED MARGIN, SMALL WHITE CEDAR ISLANDS ICYPOROK3*002*NY POND WITH UNDULATING MARGIN-SHALLOW-ONLY 3 HOUSES-SURROUNDED BY OAK WOODS-CAN SEE FROM TOPPINGS PATH. PMCYPOROK3*003*NY STEEP ERODED BANK FROM SCOUT TRAIL TO POND, NEARLY CIRCULAR, LARGE MARGIN DURING LOW WATER, 1 HOUSE IMMEDIATELY ON POND. I [CYPOROK3*004*NY MOST OF POND FILLED IN WITH SHRUBS, SOME OPEN WATER TO NORTH PMCYPOROK3*005*NY SHALLOW, DRY IN 85 , PINE BARRENS UPLANDS, ISLANDS OF SHRUBS [CYPOROK3*006*NY SMALL, ROUND POND SET IN FIRE MAINTAINED PINE BARRENS. ICYPOROK3*007*NY POND WITH 3 SECTIONS-MID CROSSED BY POWER LINES, IN BURNED PINE BARRENS. DMCYPOROK3*008*NY SHALLOW DARK WATER POND W/EXTENSIVE EXPOSED MARGIN ON E SIDE SET IN P.RIGIDA DOMINATED PINE BARRENS. —ICYPOROK3*009*NY VERY SMALL WOODLAND POND CONNECTED TO "DEAD CAR" POND IN HIGH WATER-SURROUNDED BY PINE BARRENS-COMPLETELY DRY IN 1985. ICYPOROK3*010*NY VERY SHALLOW POND SET IN PINE BARRENS-ALMOST DRY IN 1985. PMCYPOROK3*011*NY SHALLOW POND SET IN PINE BARRENS WITH WHITE CEDAR SHRUBS ON SMALL ISLANDS IN POND - DRY IN 1985 (DRY YEAR) . ICYPOROK3*012*NY SMALL PD WITH EXTENSIVE MARGINS (1985) SET IN PINE-OAK WOODSWITH SHRUB THICKET AT N AND E ENDS. DMCYPOROK3*013*NY SMALL KETTLEHOLE POND SET IN OAK WOODS WITH ONE HOUSE SET BACK FROM MARGIN. _.ICYPOROK3*014*NY SHALLOW ELONGATE POND SURROUNDED BY HOUSE-BLUESTONE DRIVEWAY ALONG E SIDE. ICYPOROK3*015*NY ELONGATE SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SURROUNDED BY WETLAND TREES, BROAD MARGIN (EXPOSED IN DRY 1985) . PMCYPOROK3*016*NY SMALL SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND W/WIDE EXPOSED MARGIN (1985) SURROUNDED BY DECIDUOUS WOODS, ONE HOUSE ON SE SIDE. ICYPOROK3*017*NY ELONGATE POND WITH SMALL ISLANDS OF SHRUBS AND WHITE CEDAR. DRY IN ' 85. PINE BARRENS UPLAND. PMCYPOROK3*018*NY VERY NARROW LONG POND (LOOKS LIKE A RIVER) WITH A BURNED OUT VW AT N END & RECENTLY BURNED PINE BARRENS AT EDGES. __ICYPOROK3*019*NY SMALL ROUND SHALLOW POND ADJACENT TO RT 25 (ACROSS FROM DELI) . N END WITH PHRAGMITES, SURROUNDED BY PINE BARRENS. iCYPOROK3*020*NY SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SET IN PINE BARRENS NEAR SAND ROAD. PMCYPOROK3*021*NY SMALL (LESS THAN 1 ACRE) , SHALLOW MORAINAL DEPOSIT WETLAND SET IN DRY OAK WOODS. [CYPOROK3*022*NY REMOTE, SHALLOW POND SET IN RECENTLY BURNED PINE BARRENS. rrICYPOROK3*023*NY SHALLOW POND (DRY IN 1985 & 1986) PMCYPOROK3*024*NY SMALL COASTAL PLAIN POND SET IN REMOTE PINE BARRENS. [CYPOROK3*025*NY COASTAL PLAIN POND W/OPEN MARGIN SET IN PINE BARRENS. __ICYPOROK3*026*NY BRAIDED STREAM CORRIDOR THROUGH PINE BARRENS. ' Records Processed ,GE 1 A4r yl t 1r 1�r.� �) S 14 : 48. 44 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )ASTOTIZO*001*NY WETLANDS IN OUTWASH VALLEY, 2 PDS FROM DAMS. WET PINE BARRENS GRADING INTO PINE BARREN UPLANDS, BRAIDED STREAMS WITH SHRUB TUSSOCKS )ASTOTIZO*002*NY VERY SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND. EO ON SMALL TUSSOCKS AROUND SMALL WHITE CEDARS. PDASTOTIZO*003*NY MEDIUM FEN AND SHRUB FEN BORDER BETWEEN FEN AND SHRUB SWAMP. )ASTOTIZO*004*NY HIGH ELEV. , ACIDIC LAKE LOCATED IN NORTHERN HARDWOODS AND SPRUCE-FIR FORESTS. PDASTOTIZO*005*NY SEDGE-SPHAGNUM-SHRUB BORDER BETWEEN INLET CHANNEL AND BOG TO SE. ASTOTIZO*006*NY SOFTWATER LAKE, OLD BEAVER DAM AT NE END, FAST & SAND INLET STREAM (N BRANCH MOOSE RIVER) DnASTOTIZO*007*NY BLACK SPRUCE, LARCH, SPHAGNUM, SEDGE BOG. FREQUENT USE BY BIRDERS AND EDUCATIONAL GROUPS. _ JASTOTIZO*008*NY SOFTWATER LAKE, CLEAR NOT TANNIC. BOGGY SHORES ALONG INLET, MARSH WITH LOBELIA, SCIRPUS SUBTERMINALIS, UTRICULARIA PURPUREA. )ASTOTIZO*009*NY CIRCULAR 50-100 ACRE MEADOW SURROUNDED BY SPRUCE AND FIR. REMOTE, PRETTY. FOREST OR SWAMP FLOODED IN LAST 20-30 YRS. "7ASTOTIZO*010*NY 3 ACRE BOGGY ISLAND TORN LOOSE BY RISING WATER WHEN LAKE WAS DAMMED, FLOATED TO PRESENT POSITION. SPHAGNUM-SEDGE-HEATH MAT. PDASTOTIZO*011*NY NARROW SANDY BEACH W/ SHRUB-SPHAGNUM TUSSOCKS. )ASTOTIZO*012*NY 12 Records Processed ] GE 1 14 : 46: 49 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ] CYPOL040*001*NY VERY SHALLOW PD W/EXCELLENT EXPOSED MARGIN, SMALL WHITE CEDAR ISLANDS CYPOL040*002*NY MANY HOUSES AROUND LARGE KETTLEHOLE POND. EXPOSED MARGINS (IN LOW WATER YRS) W/ANNUALS & STRANDED SHALLOW WATER SPP. CYPOL040*003*NY SHALLOW POND W/UNDULATING MARGIN & ONLY 3 HOUSES. POND SURROUNDED BY OAK WOODS WHICH CAN BE SEEN FROM TOPPINGS PATH. ] :CYPOL040*004*NY SHALLOW, ROUND PD COVERED WITH VEG, SURROUNDED BY PINE BARRENS. ] CYPOL040*005*NY SMALL SHRUBBED IN PD CONNECTED TO FOX POND AND ADJACENT TO RIVER RD. PMCYPOL040*006*NY ELONGATE POND W/SMALL ISLANDS OF SHRUBS & WHITE CEDAR, DRY IN 85. PINE BARRENS UPLAND I CYPOL040*007*NY SMALL, ROUND POND SET IN FIRE MAINTAINED PINE BARRENS. 1..CYPOL040*008*NY POND WITH 3 SECTIONS-MID CROSSED BY POWER LINES, IN BURNED PINE BARRENS. ] CYPOL040*009*NY SHALLOW POND (DRY IN L985) , PINE BARRENS UPLANDS, ISLANDS OF SHRUBS. PMCYPOL040*010*NY SMALL COASTAL PLAIN POND SET IN PINE BARRENS, BURNED CA 1980, MANY DEAD TREES, BROAD MARGIN, EXPOSED IN 1985 . ] CYPOL040*011*NY ROUND KETTLEHOLE POND W/ STEEP SIDES AND EMERGENT VEGETATION. MANY HOUSES AT TOP OF KETTLEHOLE DEPRESSION. PMCYPOL040*012*NY E AND SW SIDES W/ OPEN WATER (OR EXPOSED MARGIN IN DRY YEAR) , REST OF POND IS SHRUB THICKET. ONE NEW HOUSE FOUNDATION ONN SIDE. PMCYPOL040*013*NY SMALL SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND W/ WIDE EXPOSED MARGIN (1985) SURROUNDED BY DECIDUOUS WOODS & ONE HOUSE ON SE SIDE. [CYPOL040*014*NY VERY SHALLOW POND SET IN PINE BARRENS-ALMOST DRY IN 1985. PMCYPOL040*015*NY SHALLOW POND SET IN PINE BARRENS W/WHITE CEDAR SHRUBS ON SMALL ISLANDS IN POND-DRY IN 1985 (DRY YEAR) . I CYPOL040*016*NY SMALL PD WITH EXTENSIVE MARGINS (1985) SET IN PINE-OAK WOODS W/ SHRUB THICKET AT N & E ENDS. PMCYPOL040*017*NY SHALLOW POND SET IN OAK DOMINATED WOODS W/ ONLY 4 HOUSES ON MARGIN, OFF LILY POND RD. L_:CYPOL040*018*NY ELONGATE SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SURROUNDED BY WETLAND TREES, ROAD MARGIN (EXPOSED IN DRY 1985) . ] CYPOL040*019*NY LARGE, SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SET IN OAK-DOMINATED WOODS, FOUR HOUSES ALONG THE MARGIN. PMCYPOL040*020*NY VERY SMALL, SHALLOW POND SET IN DECIDUOUS WOODS (COMPLETELY DRY IN 1985) W/VERY MUCKY CENTER AND ORV DAMAGE. ] [CYPOLO40*021*NY SMALL KETTLEHOLD POND SET IN OAK WOODS WITH ONE HOUSE SET BACK FROM MARGIN. PMCYPOLO40*022*NY SMALL, SHALLOW WOODLAND POND. ONE PATH LEADS TO SE END. ] CYPOLO40*023*NY SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SET IN PINE BARRENS. 1..CYPOLO40*024*NY ELONGATE SHALLOW POND OPEN AT S END. SHRUBBED IN AT NORTH-CLEARING ON SW SIDE. ] CYPOL040*025*NY SANDY SWAMP ] CYPOL040*026*NY PMCYPOL040*027*NY LARGE, MUCH-USED COASTAL PLAIN POND. CYPOL040*028*NY DRY COASTAL PLAIN POND IN OPEN RECENTLY BURNED PINE BARRENS WITH LITTLE POND VEG. -1986. CYPOL040*029*NY ROUND SHALLOW POND SET IN RECENTLY BURNED PINE BARRENS, NO TRAILS TO SITE, FEW MARGIN SHRUBS. ] CYPOL040*030*NY COASTAL PLAIN POND WITH OPEN MARGIN SET IN PINE BARRENS. ] CYPOL040*031*NY DRY POND BOTTOM (1986) SURROUNDED BY PINE BARRENS WETLAND ,GE 2 14 : 47 : 00 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SHRUBS GRADING INTO RECENTLY BURNED PINE BARRENS. PMCYPOL040*032*NY OPEN PINE-BARRENS SWAMP, SURROUNDED BY WET TO MOIST WOODS, RELATIVELY LITTLE OPEN WATER (1987) . ICYPOL040*033*NY r,ICYPOL040*034*NY WET MUDDY SHORT PMCYPOL040*035*NY ICYPOL040*036*NY SERIES OF SMALL PONDS SET IN WOODS. 36 Records Processed LP ;e de z t-, 4�,`r"1,1 F v leI : ,GE 1 14 : 43 : 01 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )FAB270C0*001*NY DRY WOODS. PDFAB270C0*002*NY DRY PINE BARRENS T'7FAB270C0*004*NY PINE BARRENS )FAB270C0*005*NY DRY, OPEN GROUND rJFAB270C0*006*NY DRY WOODS PDFAB270C0*007*NY )FAB270C0*008*NY )FAB270C0*009*NY PDFAB270C0*010*NY --)FAB270C0*011*NY SANDY FIELD. )FAB270C0*012*NY DRY PINE BARRENS . YDFAB270C0*013*NY SANDY SOIL, IN SCRUB-OAK THICKETS DnFAB270C0*014*NY )FAB270C0*015*NY DRY WOODS. . JFAB270C0*016*NY DRY RR BANK PDFAB270C0*017*NY DRY WOODS )FAB270C0*018*NY )FAB270C0*019*NY PDFAB270C0*021*NY SANDY WOODS -7FAB270C0*022*NY )FAB270C0*023*NY PDFAB270C0*024*NY DRY WOODS DOFAB270C0*025*NY DRY WOODS )FAB270C0*026*NY DRY, SANDY SCRUB. _ JFAB270C0*027*NY OPEN ANDROPOGON STANDS IN OAK BRUSH PLAINS. PDFAB270C0*028*NY SALT MARSH ALONG TIDAL CREEK, PHRAGMITES ABUNDANT IN SOME AREAS, SITE FLANKED BY DRY OAK WOODS. )FAB270C0*029*NY ROUND POND WITH SEVERAL HOUSES AND TOWN BULKHEAD ON E SIDE. PDFAB270C0*030*NY SUCCESSIONAL PINE BARRENS-GRASSLAND, LARGEST PORTION OF SITEMAINTAINED & USED BY FAA W/RADIO TOWER & OTHER STRUCTURES. rJFAB270C0*031*NY SCRUB OAK THICKET WITH SCATTERED PINES-LOADS OF TRAILS AND TRASH. )FAB270C0*032*NY ON E FACING SLOPE TO DRAINAGE DITCH GRASSY W/SOME LANDSCAPING PLANTS AND SOME ILLEGAL DUMPING. Records Processed 4 1__GE 1 14 : 41: 10 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l 1BRAOKOL0*001*NY SWAMP FOREST W/ RED MAPLE, SWAMP WHITE OAK, RED ASH AND RANUNCULUS FLABELLARIS. DEEP, MUDDY, ORGANIC ALKALINE SOILS. RR TO W OF SITE, RD AND UPLANDS TO S & E. l IBRAOKOLO*002*NY SANDY SHORE. I-JBRAOKOLO*003*NY MUCKY INTERTIDAL BORDER OF ROUND POOL ALONG RIVER-SUBJECT TO RUNOFF AND LITTERING. ►BRAOKOLO*004*NY MUCKY FRESHWATER INTERTIDAL MARSH/THICKET ALONG FAST FLOWING STREAM NEAR HYWY & TOWN MAINTENANCE AREA. Records Processed F GE 1 14 : 38 : 05 26 JAN 1991 EOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENDESC: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F CLU03010*001*NY PDCLU03010*002*NY Pr"CLU03010*003*NY MOIST F CLU03010*004*NY SANDY TO MUDDY SHORES, WET MEADOW. FLCLU03010*005*NY BOGGY SHORE. PDCLU03010*006*NY F CLU03010*007*NY WET, GRASSY SHORE. SWAMP SHORE. I CLU03010*008*NY SWAMP PDCLU03010*009*NY POND BORDER F-CLU03010*010*NY I CLU03010*011*NY MOIST MEADOW PuCLU03010*012*NY PnCLU03010*013*NY ] CLU03010*014*NY POND W/ UNDULATING MARGIN, SHALLOW, ONLY 3 HOUSES, SURROUNDED BY OAK WOODS, CAN SEE FROM TOPPINGS PATH. PDCLU03010*015*NY l CLU03010*016*NY ] CLU03010*017*NY PDCLU03010*018*NY CLU03010*019*NY CLU03010*020*NY CLU03010*022*NY PnCLU03010*023*NY SHALLOW POND SET IN OAK DOMINATED WOODS, ONLY 4 HOUSES ON MARGIN, OFF LILY POND RD. 1_,CLU03010*024*NY ROUND POND W/ SEVERAL HOUSES AND TOWN BULKHEAD ON E SIDE. PDCLU03010*025*NY ELONGATE SHALLOW COASTAL PLAIN POND SURROUNDED BY WETLAND TREES, BROAD MARGIN (EXPOSED IN DRY 1985) . ] ,CLU03010*026*NY SMALL KETTLEHOLD POND SET IN OAK WOODS WITH ONE HOUSE SET BACK FROM MARGIN. r-CLU03010*027*NY ROUND, VERY SHALLOW ROADSIDE POND WITH LOADS OF DEBRIS AND RUNOFF. PuCLU03010*028*NY SHALLOW ELONGATE POND SURROUNDED BY HOUSES, BLUESTONE DRIVEWAY ALONG E SIDE. Records Processed V h-1 ca l 4je-!G -,a o' a TA a-S 44.� � (JSu u/�y ih Suj'I efds h'I ¢r San So; .ln ��Qll Wa�cf- a7- Ode e-0 e a74 dWdIS, US utc�l iy Sal�1� So�'� � y APPENDIX A-5 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DOCUMENT COMMENTS TO ORIGINAL D.E.I .S . o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o "= tJ� scow L HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman yO �..,.� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �' Q Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Roar Kenneth L. Edwards P O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 19, 1990 Peter S. Danowski, Jr. 616 Roanoke Avenue P.O. Box 779 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Macari at Laurel SCTM#1000-121-4-9 Dear Mr. Danowski: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a special meeting held on Friday, November 16, 1990. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deem the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) dated September 1990, and received by the Planning Board on September 27, 1990 , incomplete in regard to scope, content and adequacy as per the November 8, 1990, report from Cramer, Voorhis and Associates. The DEIS is to be amended to address or include the items noted in the report. The thirty ( 30) day public comment period to consider the accuracy and validity of the document will not be started until the Planning Board has deemed the DEIS complete. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Charles J. Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates f �';RAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 'J J ( . l November 8, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Draft Environmental Impact Statement Macari at Laurel Dear Benny: We are in receipt of the Draft EIS for Macari at Laurel. As per your request, we have performed a preliminary review of the document for scope, content and adequacy, in accordance with SEQR NYCRR Parts 617.8 - Environmental Impact Statement Procedures. In general, the document provides a complete and detailed analysis of the environmental impacts relating to the Macari project specifically. There are several items referenced which are not included, that will be identified below, along with several additional points which should be addressed prior to acceptance. One major omission has to do with cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with other projects in the area. This section of the report (Section X), does not provide any assessment of cumulative impacts to wildlife, or coordination of land use in sensitive environmental areas of the project vicinity. As stated in the procedures, '7f the draft EIS is determined to be inadequate the lead agency must identify in writing the deficiencies and provide this information to the applicant." The letter and documentation contained herein addresses the inadequacies of the Draft EIS with respect to scope, content and adequacy. It is our recommendation that the Draft EIS be amended to address the issues included in this review, prior to its acceptance for circulation to the general public. It is our further recommendation that the text of the document be amended as opposed to submission of some type of addendum. This will provide a cohesive document which will provide a basis for public review upon resubmission. The following comments pertain directly to the Draft EIS: Summnry The SEAR Scoping Checklist (NYCRR Part 617.21), which was used a basis for scope indicates that a summary should include "Significant,beneficial and adverse impacts, (issues of controversy Hurst be specified)". Accordingly, the summary should indicate that there is controversy,concern,and amplified impacts with regard to this project, in view of a number of other land use proposals in the area of the project site. Cumulative impacts and issues should be stated early in the document in order to focus on these major issues of concern. Introduction Page I_4 In reference to the first sentence on Page I-4, a review of Appendix A-2 included with the Draft EIS does not correspond to the impacts identified in the text on Page I-4. This should be clarified or the reference deleted. Page 1 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 hlacari at laurel Lake Draft EIS Review Description of Proposed Project pace 11=2 The second complete sentence indicates that'The land has right-of-way access from Laurel Lake Drive and Kirkup Lane(Plate 1). Review of Plate 1 finds no reference to Laurel Lake Drive and Kirkup Lane. This is confusing and should be clarified. Reference to access and area roads should be consistent and accurate. There are several places in Section I where this occurs. Description of Proposed Project Page 11_4 The second complete sentence indicates that"Sewage disposal methods for the site will include septic systems as illustrated on Plate 1. Review of Plate 1 finds no illustration of sewage disposal methods. The scoping outline for this project requires a discussion of Construction and Operation as regards the project. The docurient indicates that construction will commence immediately upon receipt of approvals and last for five years. A more definitive construction schedule should be provided, and the applicants intent with regard to building homes or selling lots should be indicated. The maintenance concept for open space areas should also be presented. Biological Setting- Flora Paves 111 14 to 111-26 In many cases the"Common Beech"tree is referred to as a"Beach" tree. The entire document should be reviewed for this fault in terminology, and corrected. The letter from the New York Natural Heritage Program (April 25, IWO;Appendix A-4),identifies seven (T) rare plants in the Southold area. The location of these species should be determined, and the significance in terms of the subject site should be assessed. Biological Setting- Fauna Page IIL22 The Peregrine Falcon,and the Osprey are noted as possible species in association with the site. It should be noted that the Peregrine Falcon is an endangered species in New York State and the Osprey is a threatened species. Groundwater Paves III-45 and i11-48 The elevation of water in the test holes is not included in Appendix C, as inferred in the text on Pages III-45 and III-48. Depth to water beneath the site should be provided, as well as monitoring well information and location of wells and/or test holes. Traffic Paec III-RR Page 111-88 was missing from the copy reviewed by the consultant. This should be included in subsequent revisions. Flora - Impacts Page IV-15 The species list in the Environmental Setting section is not consistent with the species list in the Impact section. The species expected on the site based upon habitat, and the impacts to these species should be indicated. The Chipping Sparrow, Grasshopper Sparrow, Vesper Sparrow, Mute Swan, Black Duck, and Mallard arc added to the list in Section IV,and the Peregrine Falcon is omitted. It is submitted that the list contained in Section IV is more representative of site wildlife. A more detailed discussion of the impact upon endangered, threatened and species of special concern is warranted, due to the unique statewide status of these species. The impact resulting from habitat loss and the stresses placed on feeding and reproductive habitats should be included. Similar to Section 111, the statewide designation of the Peregrine Falcon and the Osprey should be noted. CRAMER, VOORHIS•Al �, SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAAh1D.� 1 G CONSULTANTS Page 2 �— u .�.t.r��w.rwr a.rlH..ivtl.w.r.��w.{`I►'�'rra.r�..�a ., .. .. .. - ; • . iNiacari at Laurel Lake Draft EIS Review Sanitary Waste - Tmijacts E,2 f V-25 The last sentence on this page refers to a yield density value of 1 unit/acre; however,Page 1V-26 refers to a housing density of 0.4 houses per acre. These statements should be accurate and consistent. Mitigative Measures Paees V_1 to V-58 The section overall provides discussion which primarily assesses the impact of the project and does not offer concise,meaningful measures to minimize impacts to the project. Mitigation measures should be summarized in order for the lead agency and involved agencies to determine effectiveness and appropriateness, and provide a basis for the preparation of Findings. Mitigation measures must be feasible to implement and enforce through subdivision approval, bonding, periodic inspection,or some other effective means. Mitigation which is not feasible to implement and enforce should be excluded. anitar Waste- Mitigation Page V-37 The Standards and Procedures for Private Water Systems (SCDHS, 1988), indicate that the distance between sanitary leaching pools and a well should be 150 feet, not the 100 foot separation referenced in the text. The impact of the proper setback on site layout should be determined. Cumulative Tml2acts Pape 2L-1 to X-2 The cumulative impact of a series of project in the vicinity of Laurel Lake has not been discussed as was required in the scoping documentation and scoping session. The area habitats, and ecological communities should be considered in the context of areawide development, and the impacts of said development should be evaluated. Sensitive areas which warrant preservation or special planning consideration should be outlined. The cumulative impact section does not address land use issues,on an areawide basis. Existing publicly owned land, land use potential based upon zoning, and ultimate development potential and configuration should be considered in order to develop planning concepts and mitigation measures, to which projects in the vicinity of Laurel Lake should adhere to. The overlapping of land use plans and development controls which will determine the ultimate land use in the area should be reviewed as appropriate in relation to a series of projects in the area. Principals and standards for land use inter-coordination, which will assist in minimizing potential environmental impacts should be developed. The above comments pertain to the scope, content and adequacy of the subject document for public review. The document should be consistent and statements within should be accurate in order to avoid confusion. Further, additional information is needed prior to acceptance in order to allow for a complete review of the project by involved agencies and parties of interest. Hence, we have outlined what we believe to be the deficiencies in the Draft EIS for Macari at Laurel Lake. As indicated it is recommended that the applicant amend the body of the text of the document to address or include the above noted items. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the Southold Town Planning Board with our review of this Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Provided the above noted items are satisfactorily addressed in the revision, the document can be accepted and circulated for CRAMER, VOORH1IS &%' SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTA1rAIVD P,J,,,�j�(VG CONSULTANTS Page 3 Vi �\ .f Macari at laurel take Draft EIS Review a thirty (30) day comment period in order to consider the accuracy and validity of the document. We will be pleased to conduct further review upon acceptance of the Draft EIS by the Southold Town Planning Board. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this review. Very truly yours, �ha.;IZS J,V'oorhis cc: Valerie Scopaz CRAMER, VOORHIS &, SOCIATES ENVIAONMENT%�np pi 1NG CONSULTANTS Page 4 �✓ u� r.._+..._..1.��a.....r...cr«..-r+wu.-....►..ss.s.,.+.�iabww.r APPENDIX B CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY STAGE IA AND IB ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF MACARI AT LAUREL, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE: AUGUST, 1990 LEAD AGENCY: APPLICANT Southold Town Planning Board Joseph Macari Main Road c/o Peter Danoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 PREPARED BY: LOCATION: Clover Archaeological Services, Inc. A 63 . 6 acre parcel 271 Main Street located north of Laurel Northport, NY 11768 Lake in Laurel and south Contact Persons: of Sound Avenue in Janie Rees Miller, M.A. Mattituck, Town of Robert L. Miller, Ph.D. Southold. (Principal Investigators) Gabrielle A. Schavran, M.S. (Technical Editor) Telephone: 516-754-3415 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. PHYSIO-GEOLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 III. ARCHIVAL SEARCH RELATED TO THE MACARI PARCEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A. SITE LOCATION IN THE AREA OF THE MACARI PARCEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1. PREHISTORIC SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2 . HISTORIC PERIOD SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 B. HISTORICAL PERIOD: NATIVE AMERICANS OF LONG ISLAND AND THEIR LANDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 C. THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT . . . . . . 16 D. THE SETTLEMENT HISTORY OF MATTITUCK, LAUREL AND THE MACARI PARCEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 IV. THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF MACARI AT LAUREL, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 A. METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 B. THE SURFACE SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 C. THE SUBSURFACE TESTING PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 D. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS OF THE SUBSURFACE TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 E. ARTIFACTS AND DATA RECOVERY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 V. CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rl INTERVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R7 MAPS CONSULTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R8 ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE FIGURE: 1. Site Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. U.S.G.S. Topographic Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 . Geological Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 . Soil Map of Suffolk County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Archaeologically Sensitive Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Map of the Location of some Coastal Algonkian Tribes about A.D. 1600 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7 . Map of early Property boundaries in Mattituck, Southold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 8. 1675 Ryder Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 9. 1776 Lotter Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 10. British Revolutionary War Map (Fadden, 1779) . . . . . . . . 54 11. The 1829 Burr Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 12 . The 1836 U.S. Coastal Survey Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 13 . The 1836 Colton Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 14 . The 1858 Chace Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 15. The 1873 Beers Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 16. The 1896 Belcher Hyde Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 17 . The 1909 Belcher Hyde Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 18. The 1929 Dolph and Stewart Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 19. Map of Site Showing Location of Test Holes. . . . . . . . . . . . 72 APPENDICES A. Description of Positive Test Holes and Selected Negative Test Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 B. New York State Archaeological Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 I. INTRODUCTION. This report presents the results of an archaeological and archival investigation of the Macari site, Mattituck and Laurel, Town of Southold. The purpose of this Stage IA and IB Survey is to determine the prehistoric and historic sensitivity of the property through a review of archival, cartographic, and other published references, as well as by conducting a surface field reconnaissance and subsurface testing program on the site. The study is divided into two main sections: 1) the archival search; and 2) the archaeological, or field investigation. The archival search describes the existing setting of the site; reviews the prehistoric and historic sensitivity of Mattituck and Laurel, Town of Southold; presents the results of the research of the site location, public archives, maps, and other sources. The section on the archaeological investigation discusses the general methodology employed on the surface field reconnaissance and subsurface testing; the results of the surface survey and subsurface testing; and finally, provides conclusions based on the archival and archaeological surveys. 1 II. PHYSIO-GEOLOGIC SETTING. The Macari site is situated on a 63 . 6 acre parcel located north of Laurel Lake in Laurel and south of Sound Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold (Figure 1) . The northern and southern boundaries of the site border parcels in private ownership. The western boundary borders Kirkup Lane, and the eastern boundary borders Laurel Lake Drive. Topographically, the site is characterized by gentle plains, depressions, and gentle ridges (Figure 2) . The topography is dominated by three elongate kettle depressions in the north central portion of the site. With the exception of these kettle depressions, the overall topography of the site grades southward toward Laurel Lake. The highest point, a spot location in the northern portion of the site, measures 49. 7 feet in elevation. The lowest point, within a kettle depression, measures approximately 7 feet in elevation. Thus, the total relief is approximately 43 feet. The vegetation found on the site consists of mature mixed deciduous upland forest covering slightly less than one third of the area. The remaining two thirds of the site comprises formerly cultivated fields that have been abandoned for several years. Freshwater wetlands cover a small portion of the site and are associated with the two westernmost kettle depressions. 2 FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 00 -E �1 l0 Pr•; 77 AV W4 tic �:� \." � OEC � �(\'�� •O•,•. 0 , SIT -45 v k7 O_.. � / 11 v� /�.- rte•/ 30�,- `�\ _ \ fes 25 Laurel �� ` ` — - vo �' •zs •ryLake 0 � d 00 o Cep \ 1sod °' . \ �\ •i��pJ,..= \ °25 •fib "��=����� \�_ \ \ �� . RR Sta i — P L.S. (U.S.G.S. , 1967) 0 2000 Ft. 3 FIGURE 2 U.S.G.S . TOPOGRAPHIC MAP \ r - '�b'--• ^a _ MALL_ �� "r � � .��' /�V ufl jo - .l � �• •° J°�'/✓C�ji�_� �:�f,",'PIP � �� % � ,°�r) yIESS�,� SIT 1 53 Ao Xc •^` \ \is ;���. \ � ^e o BM=`s •�; ._. - r t)Pdq \' y 6ampi(` r� Laurel kLake \ Im _`--w` 1— alloy ' ;�.5two . -Z,; y e-► .v 38 is '.- =^ � �,P •;' � \\ � ��• ••f _ ; �.• i�j�j'irZ_= "a. ° j • o• , • \ \ 'Immaculate \ - - •25� RRSta — Ji����/� \\ 25 • . o •' u •° wo\\ -- � .. .1 •' - \ \ - wry (U.S.G.S. , 1967) N 0 2000 Ft. 4 The geological deposits underlying the site (Figure 3) are undifferentiated outwash deposits of "stratified fine to coarse sand and gravel" (Jenson and Soren, 1974) . These deposits were formed during the Woodfordian substage of the Wisconsonian glaciation (Jenson and Soren, 1974 ; Fuller, 1914) . The kettle holes in the north central portion of the site and Laurel Lake directly to the south of the site are associated with the outwash deposits. The site specific soil map (Figure 4) shows that nine soil types are present (USDA, 1975) . Soils from the Haven series are the most abundant. HaA with 0 to 2% slopes is found in the northern portion and along the eastern border of the site. HaB with 2 to 6% slopes is found in the southern and central portions of the site. Haven loams are deep, well drained, medium-textured soils well-suited to crops. Soils of the Plymouth series are deep, excessively drained, coarse-textured soils found on outwash plains. P1B (Plymouth loamy sand with 3 to 8% slopes) is found in the central portion of the site and P1C (Plymouth loamy sand with 8 to 15% slopes) in the northwestern corner. PmC3 (Plymouth gravelly loamy sand with 8 to 15% slopes, eroded) is found in the eastern central portion of the site and in the northeastern corner. CpE (Carver and Plymouth sands with 15 to 35% slopes) is associated with the kettle holes in the north central part of the site and is also found along the southern, western, and 5 FIGURE 3 GEOLOGICAL MAP area 'a,r Jc If h"d, zf'c*' 'I., -- 60- 36-- -z7— C! 50 01, '4t, 4f. - nary 41t, 04,.,4 IVI, h", z Do, - '7/6/, S(lb 'be, rot/ a,,,ID 06 to swb"rSqd_p,l,no *17 aanv sena 3040 4n, anv 44— Site indicated by arrow. (Jensen & Soren, 1974) DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS SHORE,BEACH,AND SALT-MARSH DEPOSITS AND ARTIFICIAL FILL,UNDIFFERENTIATED ARBOR HILL GROUND MORAINE HARBOR HILL TERMINAL MORAINE RONKONKOMA GROUND MORAINE RONKONKOMA TERMINAL MORAINE OUTWASH DEPOSITS,UNDIFFERENTIATED TILL DEPOSITS,UNDIFFERENTIATED MANNETTO GRAVEL 6 FIGURE 4 SOIL MAP P�e end 5° PmC3 PIC Cpe RdB PIC HaA Q� C P E PiB PIB PmC3 RdC RdA HaB NaP CpE HaB CpE RdC Q� G L.S. EXPLANATION CPE Carver and Plymouth sands, (U. S.D.A. , 19 7 5) 15-358 slopes HaA Haven loam, 0-28 slopes NHaB Haven loam, 2-68 slopes P1B Plymouth loamy sand, 3-88 slopes Pic Plymouth loamy sand, 1000R. 8-158 slopes L PmC3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8-158 slopes,eroded RdA Riverhead sandy loam, 0-38 slopes RdB Riverhead sandy loam, 3-88 slopes RdC Riverhead sandy loam, 8-158 slopes 7 northern borders. It is a deep, excessively drained, coarse-textured soil with low natural fertility. Riverhead Sandy Loam is found in scattered locations on the site. These soils are deep, well-drained, moderately coarse-textured with low natural fertility. A small patch of RdA (Riverhead sandy loam with 0 to 3% slopes) is found along the western border of the site. In the northwestern corner is a small area of RdB (Riverhead sandy loam with 3 to 8% slopes) . Finally, RdC, Riverhead sandy loam with 8 to 15% slopes, is found in southern and western central portions of the site. 8 III. ARCHIVAL SEARCH RELATED TO THE MACARI PARCEL. A. SITE LOCATION IN THE AREA OF THE MACARI PARCEL. 1. PREHISTORIC SITES. Prehistoric archaeological sites and unstratified finds are known from Suffolk County (cf. Ritchie, 1980 ; Saxon, 1973 ; Strong, 1983) , but artifacts have not been reported from the Macari site. However, the area is considered to be archaeologically sensitive, and a review of the Suffolk County Archaeological Association Inventory (SCAAI) as well as other sources [eg. , Parker, 1920] evidenced at least three sites or finds of prehistoric artifacts within one mile of the Macari site: 1) Mrs. Barbara Sayre, widow of Edward Jazombek, a former owner of the Macari property, reported finding projectile points and other lithic artifacts on the Macari parcel (Interview with B. Sayre, 1990) . Mr. Benjamin Jazombek, who formerly owned and farmed the Macari property reported finding Orient fishtail points near Laurel Lake, occasional Late Woodland Levanna points and frequent Archaic period side-notched points all over the property. Long, fluted Paleo-Indian points were also collected from sandy soil in the plowed potato fields east of Kirkup Lane 9 and north of the pond in the 9. 0 acre open space in the center of the parcel during the early 1950's (Interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990; projectile point types identified by B. Jazombek from outlines illustrated in Ritchie, 1971: 11 and from artifact outlines drawn in the field) . 2) A Paleo-Indian lanceolate fluted point of weathered chert (Reye Foundation catalogue number 10/5671) was collected in Mattituck, which at its closest is within one mile of the site to the east. The find was given no further information on provenence by the collector (Saxon, 1973 : 254) . 3) Mattituck itself was the site of an Indian village (Booth, 1949: 58; Thompson, 1918: 253) and was a canoe portage place. Two caches of implements have also been reported from Mattituck. One was a deposit of 26 jasper blades uncovered when high tide washed away a bluff. The other was a cache of five roller pestles, one of steatite carved with the head of a beaver (Booth, 1949 : 56) . The Suffolk County Archaeological Association site sensitivity map (Figure 5) shows the Macari property to be in an area of "intensive aboriginal habitation" . The North Fork of Long Island has yielded a number of sites. Parker (1920: 699) and Beauchamp (1900: 149) reported sites in or near: Jamesport (a shell heap and burial) ; Cutchogue (the stockade and village) ; Southold village (burials and occupation) ; and Greenport (occupation and shell heaps) . More recent finds and 10 FIGURE 5 ARCHAEOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE ZONES I or +a r lI1 A k Suffolk County Archaeological Cultural Resources Inventory, 1978 Association Areas of intensive aboriginal habitation f Areas of generalized aboriginal activity L� Areas of low activity or insufficient data 11 archaeological work have shown aboriginal occupation of the North Fork from several prehistoric periods. Late Archaic Bare Island points have been found on the surface of farmland in the Oregon district (Interview with Lynch, 1990) . Orient culture remains were first identified at Orient Point and have been reported from the Baxter site southwest of Cutchogue (Salwen, 1962 : 40) and from Greenport (Latham, 1953 : 61) . The Jamesport Hill site shows the transition from Orient to Early Woodland (Ritchie, 1954 : 2 ; Latham, 1953 : 62 ; Boyd, 1962 : 67-68) . The Woodland culture is represented by upper strata in the Baxter site (Salwen, 1962: 39-40) . With an increasing number of documented archaeological sites, it has become possible to construct models explaining the movements of prehistoric peoples. Wyatt suspects a pattern of "centrally based wandering" from villages located on tidal bays to temporary camps near inland ponds for winter deer hunting and fishing (Strong, 1983 : 11) . Kettle holes, such as Laurel Lake or those on the Macari property, provided fresh water. For a kettle depression without standing water, the Native Americans constructed a well by sinking a hollowed out tree trunk into the earth and down to the water table a short depth beneath ground surface (Ales, 1979: 16) . Throughout much of New England and the coastal areas of northeastern America, prehistoric groups exploited marine resources during seasons when nearshore hunting for sea mammals and fish from dugout canoes was possible. Long 12 Island was one of the classic centers of this pattern of subsistence. Seasonality of prehistoric peoples on Long Island (Ritchie, 1980: 3 ; Kaeser, 1974: 287) is certainly suggested by more recent patterns in historic times (Wyatt, 1982 : 76; Hayes, 1983 : 331) . Laurel Lake and the area of the Macari parcel could have provided fresh water, fish, and wildlife for seasonal exploitation by prehistoric inhabitants. 2 . HISTORIC PERIOD SITES The following historic period sites are representative of those which occur within a mile of the Macari site: 1) The Howell-Kujawski Homestead is located on the north side of Sound Avenue at the Southold-Riverhead boundary. The one and a half story farmhouse dates from the early 19th century. The west wing, which is the oldest part of the house, has hand-hewn timbers and oak beams (Bear, 1981:4-5) . Considerable rennovation has been carried out in recent years (I.Reeve and R. Tuthill, 1978: 10; compare the photograph in Office of Planning, 1969: 79) . This house is of particular interest since a Howell who lived on this site purchased the Macari parcel for his sons in 1691 (Craven, 1906: 59) . 13 2) The cemetery on Aldrich Lane near Franklinville Road was associated with the church that was founded in 1830-1831 and became the center of the settlement of Franklinville (Bayles, 1874 : 367; Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 436) . The oldest gravestone in the cemetery dates to 1831. A number of other gravestones date to the 19th century. 3) The old schoolhouse on the corner of Aldrich Lane and Franklinville Road (Truck route for Route 25) is now a private dwelling. The school appears on the 1858 Chace map and was used as a school into the 20th century (I. Reeve and R. Tuthill, 1978 : 14-15) . The Laurel Common School on Route 25 in Laurel was built in 1928 (NY State Retired Teachers Association, 1976: 35) . 14 B. HISTORICAL PERIOD: NATIVE AMERICANS ON LONG ISLAND AND THEIR LANDS At the time of arrival of the first European settlers in eastern Long Island there were several different groups of Algonquian Indians living in the area (Ales, 1979 ; Figure 6) . Algonkian-speaking Indians inhabited New England and the eastern half of Long Island at this time; Delaware-speaking groups were found in New Jersey and western Long Island. The division between Nassau and Suffolk County, which itself dates back to the division between English and Dutch political boundaries in the 1600's, may reflect an earlier native linguistic division on Long Island. At the time of contact, the Southold area was inhabited by the Corchaug, whose lands extended from Orient Point westwards to Wading River. Within the Corchaug there was at least one smaller subgroup, the Yenicock, whose name was used by the early European settlers as the general name for Southold until 1644 (Ales, 1979: 22 ; Case, et.al. , 1876: 10; Flint, 1896: 234) . The Corchaug in turn were part of the larger Montauk Confederation, which included the Corchaug, Manhasset, Shinnecock, and Montauk and then expanded to take in groups further west on Long Island (Ales, 1979) . The usefulness of the division of Long Island into 13 15 FIGURE 6 MAP OF COASTAL ALGONKIAN TRIBES CA. 1600 SAND S0UNDMPaNPgSE( I LDN6 c SETAUKETrOSGN N 0 ODE A v , G Off, MAT10 'Isol`' SE -.UA ppTCNQG✓ t�-A N (I s kms'� P ♦ Member of Mahican Confederacy e Member of Wdaomger Confederacy Member of Montauk Confederacy ■ Member of Delaware Confederacy 0 3 4 to 30_ A0 Sp SCALE IM MILES GGi�41re (W.A. Ritchie, 1953) 16 geographically static Native American tribes has been called into question (Stone, 1989) ; doubts have been raised as to the validity of the term `tribe' on Long Island altogether. It is unclear whether names of `tribes' are really separate tribes, groups living in specific geographic locations, or closely related populations who moved their settlements periodically. Seventeenth century Native American sources described the sachems of eastern Long Island as "brothers" (Gardiner, 1660) . The term "brother" was used not only for blood relations, but also for adopted kin, friends, and visiting diplomats. The group fought together as a unit and often acted together when negotiating with the Europeans, although individual sachems also signed some land deeds alone (Ales, 1979: 22-23) . Thus, the territorial borders illustrated on the map in Figure 6 probably do not coincide with the local Native Americans' understanding of their landscape. In short, these borders do not reflect indigenous concepts of territory but rather the Europeans' need to `order' the landscape to facilitate land acquisition (Ceci, 1979 : 10; Strong, 1983 ; Stone 1989) . The Algonquian concept of their land may be glimpsed in some of the names encountered by the Europeans on contact; these names were often derived from words in the Algonkian language used to describe the geography or significance of the places people lived (Tooker, 1911; Stone, 1989: 163) . Corchaug 17 and Cutchogue, for example, are both derived from kehche, meaning chief, pre-eminent, or principal, with the locative ending -auke or -ock. Thus, Cutchogue means "the greatest or principal place" and referred to Fort Cutchogue (or Corchaug) , the palisaded enclosure where the sachem lived and where women and children took refuge in times of danger (Tooker, 1911: 56-58) . The meaning of Mattituck, however, is more problematical since the obvious linguistic meaning does not correspond with the land in the Mattituck area as the settlers found it. Matta means "no, bad, poor" (Tooker, 1911: 121; Craven, 1906: 19) . The substantive tuck could be the colonists' transcription of either tusk, meaning "wood, tree" or tuk, meaning "tidal river or estuary" (Craven, 1906: 18) . In this case, the meaning of Mattituck would mean "without trees, poorly wooded" (the meaning preferred by Tooker, 1911: 121) or "the bad creek" (Craven, 1906: 19) . Neither description would fit the Mattituck area at the time of colonization. Pelletreau, following Trumbull, suggests instead that the colonists misheard the Algonkian pronunciation and that the actual form used was massa, meaning "great" , thus giving the meaning "great creek" or "great woods" (Tooker, 1911: 121; Craven, 1906: 19) . The name Mattituck, however, no doubt predates the period of European settlement and may well refer to an earlier time when the land was cleared of trees and farmed by the Native Americans. 18 i The Corchaug, who inhabited the area of Southold, encountered Dutch and English explorers before actual settlement took place. Winthrop, who made a trip to Long Island in 1633, probably visited them. James Farrett, acting as the agent of the Earl of Sterling to acquire titles for Indian lands, would have contacted the Corchaug in his sailing journey of 1639-1640 (Tooker, 1911: 57) . Land acquisition, however, was complicated by the differing views of Europeans and Native Americans concerning land ownership. To the Europeans, a title deed was necessary, and to acquire this, the rightful owners of the land had to be ascertained. However, to the Native Americans, land did not belong to an individual but to the group. It could not be given away, although it could be loaned or shared (Stone, 1989: 162 ; Ales, 1979 : 21) . The Native Americans themselves sometimes disagreed over who had the right to act on behalf of whom in land transactions. For example, the deed of May 16, 1648 in which Hashamomock, Oysterponds, and Plum Island were sold to the Europeans was signed by Mammawetough, sachem of the Corchaug. In the deed, Mammawetough acknowledges that another sachem, namely Vxcoopesson disputed his right to the land. However, Mammawetough declared himself the rightful proprietor of the land in question with "sole right" to "give, grant, sell and dispose" . He also promised to satisfy Vxcoopesson so that he would confirm the sale (quoted in Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 19 414) . When the settlers arrived, the area of Southold had been intensively occupied by Native Americans for a long period. At least 45 Indian village sites are known on the North Fork of Long Island (Booth, 1949:54) . The first Corchaug settlement mentioned in records relating to Southold is that of "five wigwams" mentioned in the deed of August 15, 1640, in which Richard Jackson made the first known purchase of land from the Indians in the Southold area. The settlement of "five wigwams" was located between present-day Greenport and Southold village, either at the head of Pipe's Creek or on Hashamomock Neck (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 404 ; Tooker, 1911: 95) . The name of Pessapuncke Neck located between Cutchogue and Mattituck derives from an Indian "sweating place", not unlike a sauna, used for cleansing the skin and purging the body. A cave or cell would be heated up with a wood fire and hot stones to retain the heat. A group of men would strip naked, sit round the hot stones, smoke, talk, and sweat for an hour or more. On emerging from the sweating place, they would jump into a creek or brook to cool off (Craven, 1906: 33-34 ; Tooker, 1911: Both cite Roger Williams) . The most important Corchaug site was at present-day Cutchogue on Corchaug Neck and Fort Neck. One neck of land comprised the village, and the other was a palisade built on an earthwork embankment. The palisaded quadrangle measured 64 by 20 48.8 meters and enclosed three quarters of an acre (Solecki, 1950; Craven, 1906: 32 ; Ceci, 1977 : 297) . This fort and those of the Corchaug allies-- the Manhasset, Shinnecock, and Montauk-- were so situated that information could be passed quickly from one group to another by means of smoke signals (Tooker, 1911: 57) . Fort Corchaug also became a center for wampum manufacture (Solecki, 1950) . With the arrival of the Europeans, wampum, which could be transferred for or backed by beaver, became the economic base where coin money was in short supply. Those areas that were the richest habitats for whelks thus became production centers where an individual worker could make three or four dozen wampum beads a day (Ceci, 1979: 9-10) . Thousands of pieces of shell debris were recovered from Fort Corchaug (Ceci, 1977: 297-298) . The necks of land in Cutchogue called "Old Indian Field" or "Corchaug Broad Field" by the Europeans were already cleared and provided much needed arable fields amidst the forests when the settlers acquired the land (Craven, 1906: 32) . Another Native American field highly prized by the European settlers of Southold for their own use was "Old Field" near Southold village. It was a cleared plot of 60 to 70 acres east of the village on the shore of Peconic Bay. It was full of shell spreads, some up to 18 inches thick. There is evidence of occupation as well as cultivation (Case, et. al. 1876: 9; Booth, 21 1949: 54-55; Ceci, 1977: 299) , as witnessed by numerous cooking pits between two and ten feet in diameter and two and a half to six feet deep. Finds on the site included potsherds, tobacco pipes, quartz points, and at least one burial deposit with five skeletons (Booth, 1949: 54-55) . Native Americans obtained carbohydrate and some protein for their diet from cultivation of such native plants as corn and squash. In 1763, some of the old men in Southold recalled plowing land for the Indians' cornfields on Indian Neck 60 years before (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 137) . Their iron plowshares would have tilled the soil much more efficiently than the Native American stone hoes and digging sticks. The Native American women also gathered wild plants such as tuckahoe tubers (Indian turnip or Jack-in-the-Pulpit) , which they found in damp woods and swamps (Tooker, 1911: 261) , areas similar to the marshy area around Laurel Lake and the kettle depressions on the Macari parcel. Theo Native Americans obtained protein from fish and shellfish, with oysters predominating among the shells found in the shell heaps in Southold (Booth, 1949 : 55) . Deer also provided protein, as well as skin and antler. To increase the feed for deer, the Native Americans in Southold and throughout Long Island burned portions of woodland in controlled fires (Wood, 1824 ; Youngs, 1907 : 19) . Transport was by dug-out canoe. There was a canoe portage from Mattituck Creek (Tooker, 1911: 57-58) , across present-day 22 Sound Avenue, along the west side of present-day Pacific Street in Mattituck village and thence to the head of James Creek. By using this portage point and the corresponding Canoe Place in Southampton, the Native Americans established a short-cut from Long Island Sound to the Great South Bay (Craven, 1906: 17-18) . The Canoe Place in Mattituck figured prominently as a boundary in deeds of land sales. In addition, the right of continued use of the Canoe Place and the privilege to claim the skins of deer slain in water were reserved for the Indians who sold the land at Mattituck (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 436; Craven, 1906: 14-16; Ales, 1979: 44) . In 1684 , Sarah Youngs of Southold sold a tract of land east of Mattituck Creek to her brother, "reserving onely the Indians right and interest therein for four yeares according to his agreement and bargain" (quoted in Craven, 1906: 40) . The Native Americans had few other rights after European colonization. In 1644, an Indian delegation representing the four eastern tribes of Long Island requested from the United Colonies of New England a certificate outlining Indian relations with the English and assuring English protection against unjust grievances. The Indians promised that, in return, they would not injure the English or Dutch, nor would they bribe other tribes to harm the Europeans. They would deliver up any Indians who committed offences and would avoid involvement in the quarrels of others. Rather than giving specific assurances 23 against injustice, the Colonies of New England merely promised that the Indians could "enjoy full peace without disturbances from the English or any in friendship with them" (Ales, 1979: 38-39) . In 1647, there were rumors that the Corchaug sachem, Mammawetough, was plotting with his allies to kill the English at Hempstead. The Dutch decided to send Cornelius Van Tienhoven, who could speak Algonkian, to ascertain the truth of the rumors. To facilitate the proceedings, Van Tienhoven took three cloth coats and "some trifles" to present to the Corchaug (Tooker, 1911: 37) . According to Southold Records, 1649 and 1657 were years of uneasy relations between the European settlers of Southold and the Corchaug. The Europeans viewed the Indian dogs as a threat to their livestock, and a missing beef would be presumed to be the work of Indians (Case, et al. , 1876: 14 ; Youngs, 1907: 19) . One or two murders of Europeans were attributed to the Indians, and the Town of Southold appealed to New Haven for help and protection (Thompson, 1918: 232-233 ; Bayles, 1874: 363) . Generally, however, there are few references to trouble with Indians in the Southold Records (Chapman, 1965: 9) . The Europeans protected their own interests. Many towns on Long Island banned the sale of guns and their accoutrements to the Indians (Howell, 1887: 171) . In Southold, the area between Hashamomock and Plum Gut was reserved as a pasture for 24 cattle and hogs. It was lawful for a white person to bring in any Indian found with a gun, bows and arrows, or dogs in this area (Case, et al. , 1876: 14) . As Native Americans were restricted in their hunting and in the territory they could use, the newly arrived Europeans brought the Indians into the colonial economy, thus making them dependent on it (Stone, 1989: 165) . A late 17th century burial site in Laurel, for example, illustrates the extent to which European goods had replaced Native American artifacts. Just west of Brushes' Creek was an unmarked grave containing a flexed skeleton, blue glass beads, a European earthenware pot, a brass spoon, and a round bowl. Three more graves were found in the area with glass beads, trade pipes, and brass spoons (Latham, 1965: 76) . All of these objects represent trade and the pervasive influence of contact with Europeans. The English of Southold also used Native American skill and labor. In the mid to late 16001s, for example, the Southold Town Treasurer paid the Indians 20 shillings for every old wolf killed and ten shillings for every young wolf (Case, et al. , 1876: 8) . Native American labor was also used for the construction of the Benjamin House in Southold village (Viemeister, 1974 : 34) . In 1662, Captain John Youngs reported to the New England Commissioners on his efforts to acquire Indian children for the English settlers to raise as servants or apprentices. In some instances, Indians were slaves and could 25 be inherited as property (Ales, 1979: 77, 93 ; Youngs, 1907: 19) , although enslaving Native Americans was prohibited by Governor Andros of New York in 1679 (Stone, 1989: 164-165) . After New York assumed jurisdiction over Long Island in 1664, general laws were issued to govern Native American behavior and the settlers' relations with the Native Americans. The Indians were not allowed "to pawaw or perform worship to the devil" (an interpretation of any religious ceremony not Christian) . There was to be no superior sachem on Long Island; the Indian tribes were to govern themselves, keep the peace, do no damage, and enter into no alliance without the governor's approval (Ales, 1979: 75) . Licenses were issued to specific people to trade with the Indians. William Wells of Southold, for example, obtained a license to trade with the Indians "in any liquours or other commodities they shall have occasion of for their Releife" (Ales, 1979: 76) . The governor forbade purchase of Indian land without his consent (Ales, 1979: 75) . In the case of Southold, this consent was granted in the patent issued by the governor to the town: " . . . if it shall so happen that any part or parcell of the said lands within the bounds and limits afore described be not already purchased by the Indyans, it may bee purchased (as occasion) according to Law" (quoted in Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 416-417) . A century later, the Corchaug along with other Native 26 American groups in eastern Long Island appealed to the Attorney General to discover what lands belonged to them, as they were being crowded out by the white men and had no written records to prove what they owned. Although the Attorney General professed sympathy, he could find no land that could still be claimed by the Corchaug (Ales, 1979: 98-99) . 27 C. THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT. The origin of a well-documented European settlement at Southold dates to 1640, when the Reverend John Youngs was granted a small piece of land on Long Island by Governor Eaton of New Haven (Chapman, 1965: 8) . In fact, the New Haven colony forbade private purchase from the Indians (Craven, 1906: 16) . Thus, the colony of New Haven negotiated with the Indians, took the conveyance in its own name and purchased the title from the Corchaug in the summer of 1640 (Thompson, 1918 : 225; Hallock, 1915: 68) . In September or October of 1640, Reverend Youngs led a band of Puritans from New Haven to Southold for the purpose of setting up a "New Plantation whose Design is Religion" (Flint, 1896: 234) . Various numbers have been given for the original settlers, but since the earliest Town records have been lost, who exactly the original founders were is not known (Case, et al. , 1876: 6; Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 49) . Certainly, there is no doubt that Youngs was the guiding force. He was the eldest son of the vicar of Southwold in the English county of Suffolk (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 45-47) . The spelling of Southold in the New World reflects the pronunciation of the English Southwold. One man who preceded Reverend Youngs and his settlers in Southold was Richard Jackson, a carpenter with 150 acres of 28 meadows and upland east of the first village, in the Hashamomock area; he bought the deed from James Farret in August 1640. By October, he had built a house on the shore of Pipe's Cove (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 403-404) . Four days after the arrival of Reverend Youngs and his group, Richard Jackson sold his house to the settlers (Case, et al. , 1876: 6; Chapman, 1965: 8; Hall, 1975) . There are also reports that a few other men had settled along the 30 mile spit west from Orient Point; however, the original documents relating to this occupation have not been traced (Flint, 1896: 234 ; Chapman, 1965: 8 ; Hall, 1975) . The area of the first purchase, stretched from Mill Creek on the east to the Fresh Meadows at Cutchogue on the west; however, this area was soon increased by further purchases from the Indians (Case, et al. 1876: 14) . In 1647, Oysterponds (the present-day area of Orient) was bought from the Indians by Peter Hallack (Thompson, 1918: 244) . In 1649, Southold extended its western boundary by purchasing the territory from Cutchogue to Riverhead. In 1654, the eastern boundaries of the town were extended with a purchase of the land from Oysterponds to Plum Gut (Chapman, 1965: 10) . Land purchases of the Town from Plum Island to Wading River were confirmed in a deed made to Captain John Youngs, Barnabas Horton, and Thomas Mapes dated December 7, 1665 and signed by the sachem and 35 elders of the Corchaug (Thompson, 1918 : 233-234 ; Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 129) . 29 In the ten years after their arrival, Reverend Youngs' villagers set about building houses and laying out streets. Their main street was more or less along the present line. In addition, Horton's Lane was laid out as were roads to the head of the creek and leading north to Long Island Sound (Case, et al. , 1876: 6) . The houses were built close together, probably for security as well as neighborliness. By 1660 in Southold, there were at least 50 home lots; the location of many could still be identified 200 years later (Case, et. al. , 1876: 7-8) . The houses themselves were generally one and a half stories, built of heavy hand-hewn oak timber frames with hand-split clapboard siding and steeply pitched roofs (Chapman, 1965: 9) . There were few windows since glass had to be imported, and a central chimney served the fireplaces in two or more rooms (Chapman, 1965: 9) . Although very few of these early houses still exist, the Old House at Cutchogue is an example of the type of house built in 1649 . It originally stood in Southold but was moved to Cutchogue in 1660 (Viemeister, 1974 : 23) . At this time, the furnishings of such houses were minimal, and the material possessions of the early settlers were sparse. When Reverend John Youngs died in 1671, he was a moderately wealthy man by Southold standards, yet the inventory of his personal property seems quite modest. Aside from his house, land, and farm animals, he left two bedsteads and bedding, one 30 rug, three chairs, a table and chest, two kettles, pots and pothooks, farm equipment of chains, plow and cart irons, and the only `luxury' a collection of prized old books (quoted in Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 423) . As a "plantation" in the jurisdiction of New Haven, Southold abided by the guidelines set forth by the General Court held in New Haven on October 27, 1643 (quoted in its entirety in Thompson, 1918: 228-230) . No one could be a "free burgess" (i.e. a voter) in the Town unless he was a member of an approved church. The free burgesses chose the ordinary judges who would hear "inferiour Causes" and the magistrates who would meet twice a year in New Haven to try "weighty ande capitall causes" and to hear appeals. It was the job of the court to "provide for the maintenance of the purity of Religion, and suppress the contrary. " The residents of Southold applied these general provisions to their own particular circumstances. As set forth in the guidelines, all freemen had to be church members. Any newcomers were to be vetted by the town, and there were to be no sales of land or houses unless the buyer was approved by the free burgesses (Thompson, 1918: 227) . To assure that the free burgesses took their duties seriously, attendance at town meetings was mandatory with a fine as penalty for unexcused absence (Case, et al. , 1876: 8 ; Chapman, 1965: 9) . To facilitate the smooth running of community affairs, the 31 town also elected its own officers, among whom were the constable, town overseers, overseers of highways, overseers of the poor, fence viewers, and tellers of cattle. The constable as chief executive officer was assisted by town overseers. Expenses for maintaining the poor were defrayed by the town and supervised by the overseers of the poor. Besides electing officers who saw to the day-to-day running of the town, town meetings were also concerned with provisions for education, security, and the support of religion. One of the first ordinances passed by the voters of the town required each man to be equipped with arms and ammunition and to assemble at the church in case of danger to the town (Thompson, 1918: 227) . The church was the center not only of worship but also of defense. A stockade surrounded it, and it was used as the armory for at least 150 years (Flint, 1896: 235; Jefferson, 1932 : 17) . In this respect, the town was following the security arrangements set forth in the confederation for mutual protection of the "United Colonies of New England" . In this document, each male between the ages of 16 and 60 had to provide himself with a gun and sword, one pound of powder, four fathom of match, five or six good flints, and four pounds of bullets. The men were to participate in six training days a year plus a review once a quarter. Each plantation was to keep 100 pounds of powder, 400 pounds of shot, and loaded "great guns" . The 32 night watch and sentinels were to fire their guns or beat a drum to signal an emergency; if the danger was from fire, they were to shout "Fire! Fire! " , if from Indians, "Arm! Arm! " (Thompson, 1918: 236-237) . In terms of making legislation by which the town was governed, the general court of New Haven had declared in 1644 that plantations should be guided by "the judicial laws of God, as they were delivered by Moses" . Southold found, after a few years, that the Mosaic laws did not answer all their needs. Finally, in 1655-56, Governor Eaton of New Haven produced 500 copies of a new law code which was distributed among the various plantations (Thompson, 1918 : 227-228; Flint, 1896:235) . Even though the Mosaic law was not adaptable in every particular to the circumstances at Southold, the townspeople were vigilant in enforcing adherence to their own religious principles (Flint, 1896: 236; Thompson, 1918: 234-235) . However, the settlers had to solve more mundane problems, such , as feeding themselves, building houses and heating them, and pasturing their livestock. The Southold area provided them with the land to meet these needs, namely fields, woodland, and salt meadow. Initially, the arable fields were divided up into one or two acre parcels which were shared out among the members of the community. Situated conveniently close to the settlement, within a mile or two to the east, was "Old Field" , a 60 to 70 acre fertile parcel on the bay, formerly an Indian 33 field. It was there that the settlers grew grain and vegetables for the table; surrounding the field was a general fence made and maintained by all users of the field (Chapman, 1965: 10; Case, et al. , 1876: 9) . The woodland on Long Island Sound north of Southold village provided timber and firewood (Chapman, 1965: 10) . The wood in this area, however, was quickly dispatched. In 1654 and again in 1660, the Town of Southold prohibited the cutting of timber in the area from Plum Gut to Mattituck (Tooker, 1911: 121) . Each settler had one to four acres of salt meadow allotted to him. These meadows produced salt hay that could be used as fodder for livestock (Case, et al. , 1876: 9) . Salt meadows for the town were located on Calves Neck on the south side of the village, Aquebogue, Cutchogue, and Hog Neck (Case, et al. , 1876: 9; Chapman, 1965: 10) . The meadows around Oysterponds were used as the general grazing area for all the cattle and swine of the community. Earmarks on each animal denoted ownership, and in cases of uncertainty, the Tellers of Cattle could be appealed to. This grazing area was fenced off from the rest of the island with a General Fence that ran from Long Island Sound to the head of Sterling Creek (Case, et al . , 1876: 12 ; Hall, 1975; Chapman, 1965: 9) . In the early days of the settlement, land was held in common; later, individuals gained ownership of parcels of land 34 either by special direct grant from the town or by periodic land division (Case, et al. , 1876: 9 ; Hall, 1975) . When a dividend or land division was made, the area of land was divided into more or less equally sized lots. Then the lots were apportioned to settlers. Settlers deemed to have contributed most to the settlement received the most lots from the dividend (Case, et al. , 1876: 9-10) . The first land divisions were made of land close to the village, then further afield until almost all of the town was in private ownership (Case, et al. , 1876: 9) . In 1661, there were three large land divisions in one year. In the east, Oysterponds, the area of present-day East Marion and Orient, was divided. In the west, Cutchogue was divided, from Pequash Neck to Canoe Place. The third division was further west, from Canoe Place to and including Occabauek (Aquebogue) (Chapman, 1965: 10; Hall, 1975) . Shortly after the townspeople in Southold distributed land into private ownership, the jurisdiction of the very town itself came into question. In 1662 , the Colony of New Haven merged with Connecticut, which appointed officers for all towns. (Case, et al. , 1876: 15-16; Thompson, 1918: 235) . In 1664 , the colony of New York claimed jurisdiction over all the towns on Long Island. This was unpopular in Southold because of the greater religious freedom permitted by New York laws (Case, et al . 1876: 15-16; Flint, 1896: 237) . After the Dutch recaptured New York in 1673, they 35 unsuccessfully attempted to assert authority in Southold. When the British regained control of New York in 1674, Southold declared itself part of Connecticut (Case et al. , 1876: 15-16; Thompson, 1918: 239; Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 122-125) . As a result, in 1676, the New York General Court of Assize threatened to confiscate Southold's "titles, rights and privileges to the land" unless they accepted a patent (Thompson, 1918: 241) . With such a threat, the town finally accepted a patent from the governor of New York. The borders of the town as set out in the patent were Wading Creek on the west, Plum Island on the east, the Sound on the north, and on the south, the river which divides Southampton from Southold (Thompson, 1918:242) . As an important town in Suffolk County, Southold sometimes held county court in the town; however, there was no suitable prison for the accused. On orders from New York, the townspeople provided a prison by converting the old meeting house into a jail in 1684 (Thompson, 1918: 242-243) . A new church was built to replace the old one, and with New York's more tolerant laws governing religious freedom (Thompson, 1918: 240) , by the middle of the 18th century, there was a diversity of denominations represented in the villages of Southold (Hallock, 1915: 70) . When Southold became part of New York, it was a thriving community. Most of the settlers were still engaged in farming as yeomen, planters, or husbandmen (Case, et al. , 1896: 12) . A 36 mill was built on Mill Creek, and windmills were situated on the hill at the west end of the village and at Town Harbor (Case, et al. , 1876: 11) . The settlers started growing flax as a cash crop (Chapman, 1965: 9 ; Jefferson, 1932: 11) . Tobacco was also important; there were Tobacco Houses standing in the plain through which Orchard Street now runs in Orient, and nearby fields were called the Tobacco Grounds (Case, et al. , 1876: 11) . Horses were raised and later exported, and oxen were raised as draft animals (Jefferson, 1932: 11) . Enough cattle were reared that there was surplus for export (Case, et al. , 1876: 13-14) . Even from the early days, seafaring was an important occupation. Southold was surrounded by water on three sides and cut off from New York by 100 miles of forest and barrens on the west with only Indian tracks which were later widened to poor cart tracks (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 171) . Seafarers traded with New England and further afield with the West Indies (Case, et al. , 1876: 13-14 ; Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 171-174) . Southold exported staves, beeves, hides, and tallow; in return, they imported molasses and sugar (Jefferson, 1932 : 5) . Skilled craftsmen and tradesmen were much in demand by the early settlers with towns promising bonuses or property to those who would settle with them. For example, Southampton quarreled with Southold because, according to them, they had paid a bonus to Jeremy Veale to settle there as a blacksmith; however, he had pocketed the bonus and settled in Southold instead (Jefferson, 37 1932 : 4) . Southold was eager enough to have him that they waived the requirement that he must be a church member (Chapman, 1965: 9) . By 1665, Southold could also produce steel. An entry in the town records reads, "John Tucker of Southold has the ability to make steel and desires to have the privilege of taking clay and wood out of any man's land" (Flint, 1896: 239) . Southold also had coopers, carpenters, a glazier, and bricklayers and brickmakers near Hashamomock (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 171-174) . Several craftsmen were engaged in occupations related to cloth and clothing production: flax-dressers, fullers, weavers, a tailor, a hat-maker, a shoemaker, and a glover (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 171-174 ; Case, et al. , 1876: 13-14) . By the middle of the 18th century, Southold was liberally sprinkled with inn-keepers and tavern keepers. For example, the Webb House, now located in Orient, was originally built in Greenport and was used as an inn from 1740 (Viesmeister, 1974 : 22) . Also, a large inn was in operation in present-day Orient in the late 1700's (Office of Planning, 1969 : 80) . There were 14 tavern-keepers in the town as well as retailers who were allowed to sell rum. (The retailers could sell rum in minimum measures of a gallon) (Jefferson, 1932: 12-14) . The town meetings during the 18th century were concerned mainly with maintenance of highways, regulation of cattle, and the care of the poor (Case, et al. , 1876: 15) . 38 In the years leading up to the Revolutionary War, military training took place at 8: 00 every Monday morning (Jefferson, 1932 : 17) . Through the leadership of Ezra L'Hommedieu, a prominent Southold citizen of Huguenot descent, most men in Southold pledged their support of the Continental Congress (Hallock, 1915: 70) . A company of Minute Men was formed in 1775 (Case, et al. , 1876: 17) . By 1776, there were 57 Southold men just on the muster roll of Captain Paul Reeve, and many Southold men had already left to join the military camps in New England (Jefferson, 1932 : 17-19) . Besides training, Southold also prepared for war by building a fort on the eastern extremity of Oysterponds to prevent a British landing (Thompson, 1918: 245) . The Battle of Long Island, August 29, 1776, brought an end to organized military resistence to the British on Long Island. The regiment of Southold Minute Men was disbanded, and many Patriots fled to Connecticut (Case, et al. , 1876: 17) . In the autumn of 1776 there was a great exodus of refugees leaving by ship from inlets and harbors, such as Mattituck Creek and Goldsmith's Inlet; 48 ship captains assisted in the evacuation (Jefferson, 1932 : 7) . Throughout the war, a steady stream of refugees fled to Connecticut, almost half the population of Southold according to some estimates (Chapman, 1965: 10; Jefferson, 1932 : 10) . Those remaining in occupied Long Island were subject to "frequent insults, indignities and losses of property" (Case, et al. , 1876: 17) . 39 When the British occupied Southold, troops were quartered at various places in the town. The large inn at Orient Point, for example, housed British soldiers (Office of Planning, 1969: 80-81) , and in Southold village, the commander of the British forces lodged with the brother-in-law of a prominent Patriot and had his troops camped in three locations-- east of the village, west of the village, and in the center at the end of Town Harbor Road at Terry Lane (Jefferson, 1932: 25) . The large number of British troops (at least 1000 in 1778-- Jefferson, 1932: 24) pillaged the area for grain and cattle. For their firewood, the British soldiers cleared wooded areas, then burned the stumps to prevent the Southolders from using what they had left (Jefferson, 1932 : 21) . For the years of the war 1777 to 1781, the seat of government was moved to Mattituck and put into the hands of the Loyalist Parker Wickham (Jefferson, 1932: 20) . In some cases, the refugees who had fled to Connecticut found themselves no better off than their compatriots in Southold. Those who had no means of support in Connecticut or who had elderly or indigent relatives left in Southold petitioned to return to their homes (Onderdonk, 1849: 89-91ff) . Meanwhile, in the Southold area, there was considerable resistence to British occupation. Whale-boats from the Connecticut coast carried out raids on British troops and Loyalists and sometimes even on Patriots, and in 1781, a 40 representation was made by citizens in Southold complaining of the raiding parties (Onderdonk, 1849: 103) . In addition, to discourage Americans from working for or dealing with the British, American rebels circulated counterfeit British money (Jefferson, 1932: 20-21) . When the war was over and the refugees returned in 1783, they faced considerable deprivation and hardship. Money was in short supply, and as a result, some refugees were forced to sell or mortgage their property. Even those who could keep their land found that it was overgrown and repairs were needed (Chapman, 1965: 10) . Some unsung Patriots of the Revolution were slaves who joined their masters to fight in the Continental Army (Jefferson, 1932 : 11) . Slaveholding was not uncommon in Southold. The wealthiest families had five or six, or even more, and many ordinary families had one or two slaves (Jefferson, 1932 : 11; Chapman, 1965: 11) . As an indication of slaves' position in the community, the third church in Southold, constructed in 1761 and used until 1803 , provided seating according to community status, with rear seats and the gallery reserved for slaves (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 420) . Slavery came to an end in 1808 when New York law decreed that all slaves under the age of 65 must be freed. The town records show many manumissions (Chapman, 1965: 11) . At least some of the former slaves remained in the area. One notable 41 citizen was Elymas Reeve, who was deeded an acre of land by his former owner and later bought a house in Mattituck (Craven, 1906: 206-209) . As of the last half of the 19th century, there was a large enough African-American community in Greenport to support a church and "Colored Methodist Society" (Bayles, 1874 : 382 ; Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 428) . The 19th century saw a revitalization of Southold after the privations of the Revolutionary War and its aftermath. Besides the use of good farmland for productive farms in such places as Hog Neck (Thompson, 1918 : 253) , new villages, particularly Greenport and New Suffolk, were founded on fortunes from the whaling and fishing industries (Reeves, 1885) . The whaling industry in Greenport was founded in 1827, and at its height, Greenport had numerous vessels engaged in coasting and ten to twelve ships and brigs engaged in whaling. By mid-century, Greenport was considered to be the "most populous, compact, and prosperous village in the town" (Thompson, 1918: 251-252) . The streets were "laid out in regular order" with over 100 dwellings and 1210 inhabitants. The numerous 19th century buildings still standing in Greenport attest to its prosperity and popularity. For example, the whaling magnate David Gelston Floyd built Brecknock Hall for himself in 1857. As a testament of his wealth, he built the house of stone, which was not available on Long Island at the time, and imported stone masons from Scotland to work on it 42 (Viemeister, 1974 : 68) . The Townsend Manor Inn, built in 1835 in Greek Revival style, was a very popular 19th century resort (Viemeister, 1974: 39; Office of Planning, 1969: 82-83) . Travel to the North Fork was made considerably easier with the completion of the Long Island Railroad to Greenport on July 27, 1844. Previous to that time, a stage coach journey between Brooklyn and Greenport took two full days (Guide at Conklin House, Bethpage, 1990) . Thereafter, two trains a day made the four hour journey between Brooklyn and Greenport. From Greenport, steamers connected with Sag Harbor and the Connecticut coast (Thompson, 1918: 252) . During this time, the most populous villages in Southold after Greenport were Mattituck and Cutchogue (Thompson, 1918: 253) . Orient Point, too, was noted for the large hotel and boarding house of Jonathan Latham, commended for its excellence "scarcely equalled" on Long Island (Thompson, 1918 : 245) . Coincidental with the Civil War was the decline in whaling. By 1885, whaling as an industry in the Town of Southold had completely vanished (Reeves, 1885) . However, New Suffolk and Greenport had turned their attention to other forms of commercial fishing, such as scalloping and lobster trapping (Reeves, 1885: 71) . The most important fishery interest, though, was menhadden, a member of the herring family, which had been used for manure in the Southold area as far back as the 18th century. In the 19th century, men from Greenport 43 discovered that the oil from the menhadden could also be used for tanning, for rope-making, and for painting (Reeves, 1885: 72-73) . Other industries included brick-making and pottery manufacture, both using the extensive clay beds in Hashamomock. There were two brickyards in Hashamomock producing one and a half million bricks a year. The pottery was located in Greenport (Bayles, 1874 : 385) . The beginning of the 20th century saw expansion and marketing of farm produce, with the farmland of Cutchogue and Mattituck being especially notable (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 403) . With the rail journey from New York cut down to two hours, the availability of fresh produce, and the opportunities for recreation, property values boomed, and Southold was touted as the perfect location for temporary and permanent residents alike. The slogan of Silkworth Realty in 1910 was "Boost Eastern Long Island! " (Silkworth, 1910: 6, 12 , 14, 20) . Today, the Southold area continues some of the traditional occupations of earlier days. The annual Mattituck Strawberry Festival in June as well as numerous fruit and vegetable stands along the roads attest to the importance of farming. The grapes praised by Craven at the turn of the century (Craven, in Silkworth, 1910: 6) are now used for wine production, which began as an industry on eastern Long Island in 1976 (Salesperson 44 at Lenz Winery, 1990) . Summer tourism also continues to be an important source of revenue. 45 D. THE SETTLEMENT HISTORY OF MATTITUCK. LAUREL AND THE MACARI PARCEL. Soon after the settlement of Southold in 1640, a road was created to lead westwards from Southold village towards Mattituck and the head of the Peconic Bay (Craven, 1906: 22) . In 1648, New Haven directed representatives from Southold to act on its behalf in acquiring the land west of the existing Southold boundaries for the jurisdiction of New Haven (Thompson, 1918 : 232) . As ordered, Southold ascertained "by the best information they can get" which Indians were the owners of the land and purchased it from them in a deed dated March 21, 1648 (Thompson, 1918: 232 ; Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 436) . For the price of "two fathome of wampum, one iron pott, six coats, ten knives, fower hooks and forty needles" , "Uxsquepassem, otherwise called the paummis Sachem, together with his three brothers" sold the land "lying between Corchake and Ucquebaak, commonly called Mattatuck" to the New Haven colony (quoted in Craven, 1906: 14-15; Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 436) . The eastern boundary specified in this deed was formed by James Creek, Mattituck Creek, and the connecting land where the Indians drew over their canoes. In the west, the land extended to Aquebogue "and beyond" (Craven, 1906: 14-16) . The Indians were to be allowed the right to claim "the skins of such Dear as are taken by the Indians in the waters and the Indian Canoes drawn upon the shore" (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 436; Craven, 1906: 46 14-16) . The New Haven colony duly reimbursed the Southolders for their expenditure, figuring the cost at six pounds, six shillings (Thompson, 1918: 232) . A decade later, in 1658, the people of Southold requested that they be allowed to re-purchase Mattituck and Aquebogue from New Haven. The New Haven court agreed and "declared that the paying seven pounds, in good pay, the said land is their's" . The next year, Southold produced the seven pounds, but paid it in wampum (Thompson, 1918: 233-234) . The meadowland in the Mattituck and Cutchogue area was allotted almost immediately after the original purchase and included extensive meadowland east of James Creek and west of the present New Suffolk, as well as along the Canoe Place. However, the woodland at Mattituck was held in common until 1661 (Craven, 1906: 20-21) . The land was divided and allotted to private owners before the confirmatory deed of 1665 was issued. In making the division, the Town of Southold provided that anyone deprived of his rights when the confirmatory deed was completed would have a comparable amount of land given him from what was left (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 418) . According to the town records, the land in Mattituck and Aquebogue was to be divided into 40 lots (Quoted in Craven, 1906: 27) . The lots were strips containing approximately 250 acres running from the Sound in the north to the Bay in the south (Craven, 1906: 31) . The boundary lines between the strips ran parallel to each other 47 and were more or less perpendicular to the coastline (Craven, 1906: 63) . Figure 7 shows the original European owners of the land from Mattituck Creek to the present Riverhead boundary (based on information in Craven, 1906, correlated with the Hyde maps of 1896 and 1909) . The land in Mattituck allotted in the division of 1661 was not initially treated as being of great value, the parcels changing hands frequently for fairly small amounts (Whitaker and Craven, 1931: 133) . The ownership of the Macari parcel is a case in point, being the property of four different people within the space of 30 years. Within a few years after it was apportioned to John Tuthill, it was the property of Joseph Youngs, Jr. , from whom it passed to Thomas Moore, who in turn sold it in 1691 to Richard Howell (Craven, 1906: 59) . It seems that few of the owners of land in West Mattituck actually resided on their new property. In fact, the Ryder map of 1675 (Figure 8) labels Southold and Oysterponds, but the Mattituck area lacks information. Thomas Mapes never lived on his land and specifically excluded the Mattituck parcel from entailment on his death (Craven, 1906: 57-58) . John Swasey did not even mention his Mattituck property in his will (Craven, 1906: 61) . Joseph Youngs did not live on the property he bought from John Tuthill (Youngs, 1907 : 52) . There only seems to have been one residence in the western part of Mattituck, that of William Hallock in the strip along the present Riverhead 48 °f �?74 !viii/ •fir='4I' ==f .�' a / SIV FIGURE 8 THE 1675 RYDER MAP CIO 46 ................... ..................... is �K-dth 44r y Site indicated by arrow. 50 boundary and beyond (Craven, 1906: 62) . William Hallock gave his son-in-law Richard Howell the parcel of land that is now the site of the Howell-Kujawski house. Howells lived on that land up into the 20th century (Craven, 1906: 62 ; Bear, 1981: 4-5) . Richard Howell had five sons, for whom he purchased the strip of land on which the Macari parcel is sited. It appears that they had their residences north of present-day Sound Avenue. The land remained in the possession of the Howell family for several generations (Craven, 1906: 59-60) , but what use, if any, was made of the land on which the Macari parcel is situated is not known. In 1713, the Howells sold a parcel south of Laurel Lake and directly south of the Macari parcel. The deed of sale, which refers to a freshwater pond as the northern boundary, is the only mention of Laurel Lake in the Southold Records (Craven, 1906: 60n) . The eastern boundary of this property can still be traced alongside Laurel Lake Drive in a series of lopped trees (Interview with B. Sayre, 1990) and the entrenchments and mounds dug to support them. A lopped tree fence was made by splitting young saplings, bending each side to the ground, and mounding earth over them. The sides then rooted, sent up shoots, and created a thicket fence. The property boundary lines, with their hedges and lopped trees used to be called 1111:00 lines", since the angle was such that the sun hit them directly at 11: 00, a useful reminder to the farmer that it was nearing time for dinner (Craven, 1906: 63) . It is 51 quite possible that the eastern and western boundary lines of the present Macari property follow original property lines. The lopped trees on the southeastern boundary of the Macari parcel consist largely of black oaks; the broad earth embankment beneath the lopped oaks was described as an "Indian" boundary in local tradition (Interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990) . This might record a local group boundary in the vicinity of Laurel Lake at the time of Native American and European contact. The roads through Mattituck in the 18th century were the the road to the Peconic River following the present Route 25 and the northern road towards Wading River, which passed the house of Richard Howells and followed the route of the present-day Sound Avenue (Craven, 1906: 23) . Only one of these roads is shown in both the 1776 Lotter map and 1779 Fadden map (Figures 9-10) ; it seems to be the southern road, Route 25. These roads were merely clearings in the forest, "four poles wide at ye least, ye trees generally marked on ye south side of ye way" (quoted from Suffolk County Deeds in Craven, 1906: 23) . The beginning of the 18th century witnessed a large enough population in Mattituck for the construction of the first church in 1715 on the site where the Presbyterian Church now stands (Hallock, 1915: 70; Prime, 1845: 142-143) . There was also a blacksmith's shop next to the Creek and a tavern in the center of the village (Craven, 1906: 42) . During the Revolutionary War, Mattituck was the seat of 52 FIGURE 9 THE 1776 LOTTER MAP J pro ok BEL � s N D PI- �.� s o U ' elter $qo Island • 4 Roluasme L D � Diap na aua stosie s A�, P •� themo�tIN�iASI NEWEN conta flinstbe PR o MASSACHUSE'TS BAY �u-z:6 the C or,o C ONEC TICUT..earn _ap Diviaea into Coimti L.S. Site indicated by arrow. 53 .. .AROR'O`pOYR--,"j L, •���, Wfw.y.•may } } ��• t ♦I� j x f w , a j .1• ( / '. R PA C r •s, � r :3i p a►.+^;t• : 1 n ;' y' # i i + /j � ," -�( _ .� .tom �-��' O r�• ��. m i =vim �/ %1% 9EFFOLIC COUNTT - �� / j �� o Uffilk N frrrantr,frp�fj _ IM �� � =:1���,.; ��� •- �ins �_��� �j , government for Southold Town, yet the Town Records suggest little of the extraordinary events taking place on the mainland (Craven, 1906) . Mattituck was one site where Ethan Allen's brother passed counterfeit bills to discourage dealings with the British, and in 1778, a small rebel party from New England raided Mattituck (Jefferson, 1932 : 21) . At the beginning of the 19th century, although communication with the outside world was still more efficient by water than by land, the mail was carried weekly on horseback (Craven, 1906: 194-195) , and a post office was established in Mattituck in 1802 (Gildersleeve, 1967: 415) . Mattituck appears as a village designation on the 1829 Burr map (Figure 11) . Route 25 and Sound Avenue are shown as roads. Aldrich Lane, one of the first north-south roads in western Mattituck, is also indicated. Laurel Lake is not even drawn on the map, nor are there any houses shown between the Riverhead town line and the center of Mattituck. Mattituck was expanding, and the old Presbyterian Church was rebuilt in 1830 (Bayles, 1874 : 368) . However, the congregations of Mattituck and Aquebogue had, since their founding, shared services and pastors off and on. In 1830, the year that the new church was built in Mattituck, some members of the congregations of Mattituck and Aquebogue decided to found yet another church in which they could more conveniently share services "in a solitary spot between them" . This was the 55 FIGURE 11 THE 1829 BURR MAP Al '/ $ r lb ILs Di'7 39 Ir M L.S. Site indicated bV arrow. 56 founding of "Middle District" , later called Franklinville (Prime, 1845: 145) , and was located initially around the church on Route 25 and cemetery on Aldrich Lane, an area included in present-day Laurel. The church was dedicated in 1831 with 27 members (Prime, 1845: 145) , and within the year, the first burial was made in the cemetery of Sarah Wells, who died at 23 in 1831. By 1833 , a number of families had settled in the area, and the Franklinville Academy was established (Prime, 1845: 145) . The Academy was in operation from 1833 to 1892 and served the older boys and girls of Mattituck (Craven, 1906: 199-200) . In Mattituck in the 1830's and 18401s, land transport was still difficult. The first stage coach and express between Mattituck and Riverhead had to contend with deep sand in several places (Craven, 1906: 197) . The only north-south roads from Cutchogue to the Riverhead town line were Aldrich Lane and Mill Lane to Cox's Neck Lane (Craven, 1906: 219) , although the maps of the time show some tracks near where roads would be built later. The 1836 USGS Coastal map (Figure 12) reflects the growth of Mattituck and its satellite town of Franklinville. As in previous maps, the road which is now Route 25 is shown, as is Sound Avenue, then called "North Road" . Laurel Lake is shown with the name "Franklinville Pond" . A track roughly parallel with the present Kirkup Lane led from the North Road to the northwest edge of the lake. Immediately north of the lake was a 57 FIGURE 12 THE 1836 U.S. COASTAL SURVEY rc7l A X IF UL W PAO* 4L 84, Site indicated by arrow. 58 marshy area, and about a quarter of what makes up the Macari parcel is shown as forested with deciduous trees. The northern part of the site bordering on "North Road" (i.e. , Sound Avenue) was divided into fields. The only house south of Sound Avenue was that of T. Hallock, located about halfway between the Macari parcel and the center of Mattituck village. On the north side of Sound Avenue, opposite the Macari parcel was the Downs farm with house and outbuildings. The 1836 Colton map (Figure 13) shows less detail in the area of the site. Laurel Lake is shown but not labelled. Houses were dotted along the north side of Sound Avenue, but none are shown on the south side. Franklinville is shown as a collection of houses lining either side of Route 25 near the Riverhead town line. Mattituck is shown with its church and the mill built in 1820, which is now the Old Mill Restaurant. ' In Mattituck, during the 1830's and 18401s, there were three small stores and a shoe shop brought over by boat from New York (Craven, 1906: 196-197) . A school was built for the village children in 1828 and periodically superseded by larger buildings to accommodate more children. By 1835, there were 65 pupils on the school rolls (Craven, 1906: 199-201) . With the coming of the Long Island Railroad in 1844, and the increasing prosperity of the 19th century, some of the landmarks of present-day Mattituck were constructed. The Presbyterian Church sold its 1830 building to the Methodists, 59 FIGURE 13 THE 1836 COLTON MAP i JA 9 _ c� ..t Dm*lAmd tli�uid[. __- •. u�lc G X I''-4 T PX G' U N I C D AK77.'IL Site indicated by arrow. 60 who moved it, and in 1853, the Presbyterians built a new church which was rebuilt in 1871 and surmounted by a tall steeple (Viemeister, 1974: 49; Bayles, 1874 : 368) . The Octagonal House on the corner of Main Street and Love Lane was constructed in the late 1850's, when octagonal houses were in vogue (Viemeister, 1974: 18; Office of Planning, 1969 : 80) . The detailed map of Mattituck published by Chace in 1858 shows most settlement was along the main road east of the junction of Sound Avenue and Route 25. On the 1858 Chace map (Figure 14) , Franklinville had expanded to straddle the Southold - Riverhead border. The schoolhouse which is still standing on the corner of Aldrich Lane and Route 25 is shown, as is the school on Sound Avenue which stood on the ground nearly opposite the western boundary ' of the Macari property. (The school on Sound Avenue was moved in modern times to its present position as part of the Mattituck Museum; I. Reeve and R. Tuthill, 1978 : 1. ) The houses on the north side of Sound Avenue were owned by various Hallocks and D. Downs. Again, there are no buildings or indication of property use shown for the area of the Macari parcel. Laurel Lake is shown but not labelled on the map. Its inaccurate shape, size (too small) , and position (too close to Sound Avenue) probably indicate that the land around the lake was still heavily wooded and had not been properly surveyed for the map. In the third quarter of the 19th century, the population of 61 FIGURE 14 THE 1858 CHACE MAP T0Hl' 1'nrl or■ \IrrrLu�il � JOwr:. tr II -- C/f..r✓.,fry n [I'Iill•d!..0 n..a..,.�..... zz j t'I..l..r.r..y...e.....a rr 1. r ( r�uj \I.••J: J Jrd•+.H•Sr.h.Vlr, Pr.. '-j 4 r rww J T w, JTK•J!a J T rr• o Ilw+r•rr ]Iwurf . '�••+. !fir �� ,c � ��+`•" �,.: I � 4:�. t 3 i s n _- s � is�rP�,f' �•�: 7 •�� i .0 oil t ' .3 • J Mn•w•.w • � •�/• �. y JA • - �— T - 16, �\\. •�_`�1�-�` Lam-�i-��... �� __� '-' � _ _ ��� �1 -c,j=iii*� •i�� �.fw17lit f ; � T irl�' IL � •n•�!� �`, ,Cas G•�� !1;•ra j�L� ;i i•'' •n ! � •j 11 ' '. ;; a .t` �;�w�s:,'• •r�} �• ala ��^�2��s'r1%a :"e .s a,�s �'V'w tJ»)+�; ~ice� '► � '�y� •� �L�p lk \r..r�s •1.% .a �w ins ' ��. ♦*„'�' t_•�• tot t =9►C. +C C m.•G=� :6 .rra,•:�f. J Anew••1 �.� �1• t - i • ?y!: •• Imo' �tG OLD ••� � x amSPORT ; Site indicated by arrow. 62 Mattituck was approximately 600 (Bayles, 1874 : 368) . In addition to the village cemetery and two churches, there were two stores, a few shops, and the grist mill on Mattituck Creek. A hotel served the sportsmen attracted by opportunities for fishing, clamming, and hunting wild fowl (Bayles, 1874 : 367) . The northwestern suburb of Mattituck was thinly settled (Bayles, 1874 : 367) , as is shown by the 1873 Beers map (Figure 15) . On Sound Avenue, between Cox's Neck Lane and Bergen Avenue, there were four houses and the school for District Number 10. On the south side of Sound Avenue, there were no houses in the area of the Macari parcel; the closest building was T. Hallock's cider mill located approximately where today Sound Avenue and Middle Road converge. Laurel Lake was then called Hallock's or City Pond, which certainly suggests that the ownership of the Macari parcel was then in the hands of the Hallock family. However, it seems certain that there was no settlement around the pond. Bayles commends the development of houses around Marratooka Lake and comments, "Hallock's Pond, lying in the western part of the village is another sheet of water, of about the same size, upon which improvements may be made with profitable results" (Bayles, 1874 : 368) . The Franklinville settlement was composed of some 40-odd houses along Route 25 on either side of the town boundary (Bayles, 1874 : 367) . Farming and gardening were the primary 63 FIGURE 15 THE 1873 BEERS MAP NSD a h: at tv 1 / iiillillt /i I ' III \,\ \ LEM pad -'�_��, i��•\� ",r / / ji SquM,jSea L.s. Site indicated by arrow. 64 occupations, with roots and small fruit the main crops (Bayles, 1874: 367) . Farming and gardening were also important occupations in Mattituck generally; there were extensive seed gardens, and "large quantities of strawberries" , cauliflower, cabbage, root crops, and some cranberries were produced (Bayles, 1874 : 368) . By the end of the century, Mattituck had become popular enough as a summer vacation spot that there were a number of boarding houses on Mattituck Creek and three or four hotels in the village center (Gildersleeve, 1967: 412) . Other businesses catering to the needs of tourists and permanent residents alike included a blacksmith, a harness shop, a Chinese laundry, barber shops, a shoemaker, a number of stores, and an ice cream parlor (Gildersleeve, 1967: 415-416) . In addition, the Hyde map of 1896 (Figure 16) shows the factories which had sprung up to take advantage of the surplus farm produce. Besides the canning factories, Hallock's and Duryee's fertilizer factory, which gave Factory Avenue its name, produced fertilizer from ground up horseshoe crabs (Gildersleeve, 1967: 417) . In addition, the Penny family lumberyard was founded in 1890, and as late as 1985 was the oldest continuously owned family lumberyard on Long Island (Gildersleeve, 1967: 417 ; Friends of the Mattituck Free Library, Vol. II, 1986: n.p. ) . With increased business, the number of houses increased north of Sound Avenue in West Mattituck. However, on Sound 65 FIGURE 16 THE 1896 BELCHER HYDE MAP _L E 6 * * 1 r �- ., " .t..* moi•. * t ** f R 7 c :l �•. N ♦. ♦ * 1 } r ! 10I t u . 2 7 M PTT 1 l.tL 5-+- :•: ; aa•x...l '�•;�t �H �.:; e' is •uwy i•'+S �, _ �r ,` jF 1t• tr !)• ��y. T �' Ge.K./lrlw•J• di 6,4 • 41 r > e.■ + y "• 4 N S !� 1. Sir -'/��■'.a.��,r - � � aaJ.0 X.ne. •.../ �..•"•M.k•1y OUTM r. ��'�.,'� �• y. CU�11 CITY • ,e •• ` Nr • F _ t •.� ;�.A ■a r..l..p �,,.'• ! v : 8 '.• f ••' :.�fr� �' a �•C • .Q eel p•�ja.��jyrtf�.i :`�a/, °! y� •,.�:r.w•n"` F t'e; `• •! x 4�, ; y°;i�■ ? (f�t/ a �, e Pr •�.wf.,;if�r�' �f�, :1I:la°y�4:t ^< <j f 3 .. fir q %14 M E T .y k ; ''* � lei ¢ ad�s• `zE 4 8 17 9 1 SOUT ~�ES RT ¢ 2 10 16 IG 2 1 3 2 2 ¢ 70 2¢' 3 10 2 `°•""•,°•"t 9 2 t§ 71 •9 9 K 5 7 �'ye 3 10 - 13 22 10 71 5 15 17 J5 21 6 15, 13 5l� 70 g f it 76 B 72 2 gy 14 20 1619 17 20 L.S. Site indicated by arrow. 66 Avenue itself, there were only three houses between the school and Cox's Neck Lane and still no dwelling or indication of land use south of Sound Avenue in the area of the Macari parcel (1896 Hyde map, Figure 16) . By 1900, the population of Mattituck was 1200 (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903 : 435) and that of Franklinville was 200 (Pelletreau, Vol. II, 1903: 436) . By 1906, Franklinville was also called Laurel, although the church retained the Franklinville name (Craven, 1906: 13 , 186) . In 1909, as the Hyde map shows (Figure 17) , the population of Mattituck and Laurel was denser than it had been previously, with clusters of houses along the main roads and smaller farm parcels than previous maps showed. The average farm was about 50 or 60 acres, of which some was generally still woodland (I. Reeve and R. Tuthill, 1978: 8-9) . ' The Macari parcel itself was owned by W.S. Tuthill, who had contructed two buildings fronting Sound Avenue. On the west, the Tuthill property bordered that of B.C. Kirkup, whose residence still stands on the north side of the road across from present day Kirkup Lane (I. Reeve and R. Tuthill, 1978: 8) . The eastern boundary of the Tuthill property was Laurel Pond Lane, which ran parallel if not in line with the present Laurel Lake Drive, beyond which was land belonging to Charles E. Hallock. In Mattituck generally, farming continued to be a major occupation. In addition, an entrepeneur living on Marratooka 67 FIGURE 17 THE 1909 BELCHER HYDE MAP I p bl"s` O i�/•Ut L(I+ 1.!IU sYi(,.Y ,.7�.�.uiI N"Jtt./� f.�. low- ., . .;t { Cljc�s..h:Bulli ate' !'!ies.�. A:Ardif ,p(, 01A" all Aq u'u Roft v" L.S. Site indicated by arrow. 68 Lake established a creamery that churned out 500 pounds of butter daily. He also harvested the lake ice in the winter for sale in the summer (Gildersleeve, 1967: 419) . The recreational opportunities around Laurel Lake attracted hunters and fishermen for whom there was a hunting lodge and fishing camp for the Silimans before the 1930's (Interview with B. Sayre, 1990) . The lake waters abounded with pickerel, black bass, and perch (Mattituck Chamber of Commerce, 1933 : 18) . On the south side of the lake, Camp Malloy, a church camp for boys, attracted a younger clientele until recent years (Mattituck Chamber of Commerce, 1933 : 54 ; Interview with B. Sayre, 1990) . An immigrant Polish family bought 100 acres of woods including the Macari parcel from Chet Tuthill in 1920 for $27, 000 and cleared it for potato farming (interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990) . The Jazombek brothers cleared the land, blew the tree stumps up with dynamite, and raised corn the first year (1920) . In the following years, potatoes were raised on the parcel. The 1929 Dolph and Stewart map (Figure 18) shows the Macari parcel as belonging to the Jazombek estate. In the 19301s, Mrs Jazombek sold lots on Laurel Lake for the construction of summer houses. Her sons Benjamin and Edward farmed the Macari parcel, growing cauliflower, potatoes, strawberries, sprouts and corn for market until the farm was sold in 1967, followed by Edward's death in 1970. The present wooded areas were used as pasture; most of the trees in these 69 OL •Moaap ,iq pagpoipui 94TH 3 1otoo6ursn •� D � p 3171/ � 7N vow A2►irvnoo ,t� �n•1 N d Yv 1S //oGt� �a oyo�n� ° PNiil, o.y oas- z �/ c 7a O 4 r A/i9 .a1.NoD S d r�rccio,> n �spvi7y' Y' .ydr�Ony' r 3n y N392t! dVW IUVMHZS QNV Hda0a 6 Z 6 T HHZ 8 T aHflD L9 kettleholes grew after the 1938 hurricane blew down all of the big oaks in addition to the gray and white birch trees on the property (Interviews with B. Jazombek, B. and R. Sayre, June, 1990) . The Macari parcel was the scene of a 1958 military jet crash (Interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990) . After the test pilot bailed out safely, the plane landed in the strawberry patch on the eastern portion of the site (transects J-M on Figure 19) . The flames from burning fuel came to within about 150 feet of the B. Jazombek house north of the parcel and the black box was recovered from the woods in the 9. 2 acre open space on the northeastern portion of the Macari site. After the crash a 16-20 foot deep hole was excavated in an attempt to recover the afterburners, but the walls of the trench kept collapsing. In the summer of 1958, the Jazombek brothers went through six sets of tractor tires because the tires were cut up by scraps of metal and glass on the surface. Only 16 of the 24 warheads carried by the jet were recovered; the last high-explosive bomb was found in April, 1964 when Edward Jazombek ran over it and embedded it in the undercarriage of his cultivator. Because the potato fields had to be cultivated as quickly as possible, Ben Jazombek went out that evening, pulled the bomb from the cultivator and laid it under a tree so that the work could be completed that evening. The Jazombeks stopped farming the parcel in 1967. Although cultivation continued 71 ■ FIGURE 19 MAP OF SITE SHOWING LOCATION OF TEST HOLES ------------- to 09, Ar 23 2 C- ,a. A J(Z , .Z. 2 Z 2 . -w -qP —A4S Of 15 At ZL' 10 dp 011 1 • 1,t EXPLANATION -est hoesSSW 0 4- 0......... io positive test holes 9 ,' `�!F`•-=-' •1;, • `moo +�,t=__ �.,k. ' _ areas of prehistoric B archaeological sensitivity fit 6 KL M G AB C 72 after that time, in the last few years the Macari parcel has lain fallow. 73 IV. THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF MACARI AT LAUREL, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. A. METHODOLOGY. The archaeological investigation of the Macari Site was divided into two stages: 1) the surface field reconnaissance; and 2) the subsurface testing program. A topographic map and site plans prepared by Young & Young were utilized in this study. The site boundaries were established with the use of a Brunton Pocket Transit. Once the boundaries were established, the site was divided by transects following an east-west axis for the surface field reconnaissance. The transects were separated by 40 m intervals (ca. 130 feet) and a Brunton pocket transit was used to follow the transect lines. The site was traversed by foot and was inspected for possible signs of buried archaeological features and surfaces. The subsurface testing program placed test holes at 20 m intervals along the 40 m transect lines; thereby establishing a 20 x 40 m grid. All excavated sediments were sieved using a 6 mm (1/4 inch) mesh to ensure the recovery of even the smallest artifacts. The 20 x 40 m grid size was utilized due to the fact that the site lies within a potentially sensitive archaeological zone. Each excavated hole penetrated a minimum depth of 60 cm. 74 B. THE SURFACE SURVEY. No prehistoric artifacts were found on the surface of the parcel during the archaeological reconnaissance in June, 1990, although projectile points from all periods of Southold's prehistory had been collected from various plowed fields from 1920-1967. During the early 1950's boy scouts camped near the sandy soils on the E-G transects and periodically collected arrowheads; some of these arrowheads were displayed at the scout camp at Bailey's Beach until the building they were displayed in was burnt. The building was subsequently rebuilt a few years ago (Interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990 ; projectile point types identified by B. Jazombek from outlines illustrated in Ritchie, 1971: 11 and from artifact outlines drawn in the field) . The potential significance of the site and the presence or absence of undisturbed cultural layers cannot be determined without subsurface testing. As the parcel had the potential to provide information about prehistory, further archaeological investigation involving subsurface testing was indicated. C. THE SUBSURFACE TESTING PROGRAM. The test holes were dug at 20m intervals along the 40m transect lines trending east-west across the site. There were 75 22 transect lines designated A - V (Figure 19) with a total of 211 holes. This represents approximately 7 test holes per acre in the areas of the site slated for development (i.e. , approximately 30. 0 acres) . The entire area of the site slated for development was covered by the subsurface testing program, with the exception of two holes on the eastern portion of the G transect covered with exceptionally thick brush and trees that could not be cut through with a machete. The individual test holes were roughly 30cm (12 inches) in diameter and were excavated with a shovel. The test holes were dug to a minimum depth of 60cm (ca. 2 feet) . D. LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION AND RESULTS OF THE SUBSURFACE TESTING. According to the Soil Survey of Suffolk County (USDA, 1975) , the Macari Site lies within the Haven-Riverhead Association. Nine distinct soil types are present on the site (Figure 4) . Plymouth loamy sand on 3-8 percent slopes (P1B) , Plymouth loamy sand on 8-15 percent slopes (P1C) and Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8-15 percent slopes, eroded (PmC3) are found on the site (Figure 4) . These soils are found on outwash plains and on drainageways in morainal deposits (USDA, 1975: 78) . In 76 cultivated areas such as the farm operated for fifty years on the Macari Site parcel, "the surface layer is mixed with material formerly in the upper part of the subsoil, and there is a brown to dark-brown plow layer of loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is yellowish-brown and brown, very friable and loose loamy sand to a depth of about 27 inches. The substratum, to a depth of about 58 inches, is yellowish-brown, loose gravelly coarse sand" (USDA, 1975: 77) . In Suffolk County both P1B and P1C soils are used for housing developments (USDA, 1975: 78) . Test hole J16 is typical of the test holes dug in the P1B soils on the Macari parcel (Figure 4 and Figure 19) : Test hole J16: Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed dark yellow brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 40-60cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Three areas of Riverhead sandy loam are found on the Macari Site parcel (Figure 4) . Riverhead sandy loam on 3-8 percent slopes (RdB) is found in the northwestern portion of the Macari Site parcel. This is a deep, well-drained, moderately coarse-textured soil occurring in shallow, intermittent 77 drainageways in level to gently sloping areas on moraines and outwash plains (USDA, 1975: 81-83) . Where gently sloping RdB soils have been farmed, a plowpan is formed in the lower part of the surface layer and in the upper part of the subsoil (USDA, 1975: 81) . According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture soil survey of Suffolk County, "This soil is well suited to all crops commonly grown in the county, and it is used mainly for this purpose. Most areas in the western part of the county, however, are used for housing developments" (USDA, 1975: 83) . In cultivated parcels such as the Macari Site the surface area of RdB soil is likely to contain a relatively greater proportion of sand and gravel (USDA, 1975: 83) . Test hole B3 is typical of the test holes dug in the RdB soils on the Macari Site parcel (Figure 4) : Test hole B3 : Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Haven loam on 0-2 percent slopes (HaA) is the dominant soil 78 type on the Macari Site parcel in the area slated for development (Figure 4) . The Haven series consists of deep, well-drained, medium-textured soils present on outwash plains between terminal moraines (USDA, 1975: 71) . According to the Soil Survey of Suffolk County, HaA soil "is used extensively for crops" and is well suited to all crops commonly grown in Suffolk County. "Because of the nearly level slope and ease of excavation, most areas of this soil in the western part of the county are being used for housing developments" (USDA, 1975: 72) . Because the Haven loam has been extensively plowed on the Macari Site parcel, and because the site was dug up in search of the remains of the military jet which crashed on the site in 1958 , artifacts from prehistoric and modern contexts have been mixed in the upper levels of the plowed and previously excavated soils. Test holes on the eastern ends of the E and F transects illustrate this mixing (Appendix A) . Test hole Ell. Positive: piece of modern coal and modern coal cinder (-5cm) ; 2 prehistoric hammerstones (-60cm) ; modern brick fragment (-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-60cm B strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil 79 color 7 . 5YR 5/6) . 60-70cm mixed yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . The strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 5/6) found at a depth of 30-60cm in Test hole Ell is typical of HaA loam subsoil (USDA, 1975: 71) . Although Test hole Ell yielded two prehistoric hammerstones at a depth of 60cm, the recovery of a brick fragment from below this at a depth of 70cm indicates deep inverted stratigraphy, perhaps as a result of potato cultivation or the 1958 plane crash. The crashed airplane's black box was recovered in the woods east of test hole transect E (conversation with B. Jazombek, June, 1990) . Further evidence of the plane crash was found in Test hole E15, the easternmost test hole on this transect. The 1/2 inch thick safety glass fragment recovered from this test hole at a depth of 5cm is too thick for domestic or automobile safety glass, but would be the thickness and strength needed for a pressurized cabin (observation of T. Lynch, June, 1990) . Test hole F14 yielded prehistoric artifacts, a quartz flake and a flaked quartz pebble with rounded flake scars at depths of 40-60cm. This test hole also showed evidence of inverted stratigraphy: a piece of coal found at a depth of 60cm below the prehistoric artifacts. 80 Test hole F14 . Positive: prehistoric quartz flake (-40cm) ; prehistoric flaked quartz pebble (50-60cm) ; modern coal (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-50cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color lOYR 5/4) . 50-60cm cultural yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-70cm B brownish yellow sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . Prehistoric artifacts were recovered from thirty (30) of the 211 test holes excavated on the Macari Site (Figure 19) . Most of the prehistoric artifacts were found in plowsoil, but three areas of prehistoric cultural deposits below plowed soil could also be identified (Figure 19) . Twenty nine (29) test holes yielded modern or recent coal, glass, ceramic and metal from the early-mid 20th century (Figure 19; Appendix A) . Following is a summary of the finds and contexts of the positive test holes on the Macari parcel. A detailed description of the positive test holes is found in Appendix A. 81 Test hole Depth Horizon Description C8 30cm plowed modern coal. D9 20-40cm plowed modern white tile and brick. E3 0-30cm plowed modern coal and brick. 50cm cultural prehistoric anvil stone/ wood splitting wedge. E9 50cm cultural prehistoric flaked pebble with rounded flake scars. E10 10cm plowed modern clear glass. 60-80cm cultural 2 prehistoric hammerstones/ pestles. Ell 5cm plowed modern coal and coal icinder. 60cm mixed 2 prehistoric hammerstones. 70 mixed modern brick fragment. E12 10cm plowed modern clear bottle and plate glass. 15cm plowed modern brick fragment. 82 E13 10cm plowed 20th century earthenware. 15cm plowed modern brick fragment. E14 10cm plowed 20th century clear glass and modern brick. E15 5cm plowed airplane safety glass. 60cm disturbed modern coal. F2 50cm cultural prehistoric flaked stone core. F4 40cm plowed modern coal. 75cm cultural prehistoric flaked quartz pebble. F5 60-80cm cultural prehistoric hammerstone. F8 55-65cm cultural prehistoric quartz flake and hammerstone. ' F10 10-20cm plowed modern clear glass. 50cm crashed burnt stone. 83 F12 50-60cm cultural prehistoric bifacially flaked quartz with rounded flake scars. F13 30cm plowed modern brick speck. F14 40cm plowed prehistoric quartz flake. 50-60cm mixed prehistoric flaked quartz pebble. 60cm mixed modern coal. F15 10CM plowed modern brick. G1 30cm plowed modern clear glass. G2 0-30cm plowed modern coal. G3 50cm cultural prehistoric flaked stone core. G11 50cm cultural prehistoric bifacially ' flaked quartz with rounded flake scars. 80-100cm cultural prehistoric ground stone axe. 84 G12 10-20cm plowed prehistoric flaked quartz. 50cm cultural prehistoric quartz drill. G13 0-25cm plowed prehistoric quartz drill. H14 30cm plowed modern iron nails. 40cm plowed cigarette filter. H15 0-40cm plowed recent brown glass & coal. H16 20cm plowed modern clear glass. H18 20cm plowed prehistoric quartz flake. H2O 30cm plowed 20th century white slipware; prehistoric quartz flake. 60-70cm cultural hematitic rock and ' prehistoric hammerstone. I15 30cm plowed coal. I19 60cm cultural prehistoric stone axe/hoe. I22 0-40cm plowed prehistoric quartz flake. 85 J17 0-40cm plowed airplane engine filter. L15 30cm plowed coal. 50-60cm cultural prehistoric hammerstone. L18 20cm plowed modern rusted iron. 65cm ?cultural ?hammerstone/muller. L19 45-50cm cultural prehistoric quartz flake. 65-70cm cultural pestle. 90cm cultural flaked quartz hide scraper. L21 80-85cm cultural prehistoric quartz pressure flake. M16 15cm plowed modern glass; modern metal button or snap. 20-40cm plowed Seven-Up bottle glass; clear glass base with molded 119" ; rusted farm machinery bolt. M18 0-15cm plowed coal. 40cm plowed modern blue painted slipware and coal. 86 65cm mixed coal ; prehistoric flaked quartz . M20 35-40cm plowed prehistoric quartz drill. 012 60cm cultural prehistoric quartz pestle/ hammerstone. 019 25cm plowed prehistoric quartz flake. 30-50cm plowed coal. 60cm mixed prehistoric quartz pressure bladelet. 020 0-20cm plowed prehistoric hammerstone. S15 0-20cm plowed rubber gasket/valve seal. S18 15cm plowed coal. 30-40cm plowed modern glass and shell. S22 20cm plowed prehistoric quartz biface ' thinning flake. V19 60-70cm cultural prehistoric flaked quartz. 87 V20 65cm cultural prehistoric quartz flake fragment. V21 70cm cultural prehistoric flaked quartz pebble. E. ARTIFACTS AND DATA RECOVERY. Prehistoric artifacts found in the surface survey and subsurface archaeological reconnaissance of the Macari Site parcel include hammerstones and hammerstones/pestles (Test holes E10, Ell, F5, F8, H2O, L15, L19, 012 , 020) , flaked quartz cores and pebbles (Test holes E9, F4, F14, G12, M18, V19, V21) , in addition to quartz flakes, notably quartz pressure flakes from the manufacture of projectile points (Test holes L21 and 019) as well as a biface thinning flake (Test hole S22) , a stone axe/hoe (Test hole I19) , quartz drills (Test holes G12, G13 , M20) , bifacially flaked quartz (Test holes F12 , Gll) , a flaked quartz hide scraper with rounded working edges (Test hole L19) , an anvil stone also used as a wood splitting wedge (Test hole E3) , ' a ground stone axe (Test hole Gll) . Hematitic concretionary rocks were also found on the Macari site. These types of paint stones are frequently found at sites dated from the time of European contact as well as earlier periods of Long Island 88 prehistory (Smith, 1950: 112 ; Ritchie, 1980) . Cosmetic ferrous and ferric rocks were an important source of yellow and red pigments traditionally used by Native Americans to identify themselves when travelling outside of their home territories. As one 17th century English visitor to Long Island observed: "They grease their bodies and hair very often, and paint their faces with several colours, as black, white, red, yellow, blew, &c. which they take great pride in, every one being painted in a several manner" (Denton, 1670: 13) . Pieces of arkosic concretionary pebbles were found in many test holes on the Macari Site parcel. These natural pebbles were crushed, abraded and eroded by the glacier that brought them from the north. Although these limonitic and hematitic pebbles would have been used as the source of yellow and red pigments, naturally broken pebbles cannot be distinguished from intentionally broken pebbles from which yellowish earthy limonitic deposits and reddish argillaceous hematitic minerals had been scraped out to be used as pigments (Dana and Ford, 1932 : 483-485, 505-506) . Stone hammers such as those found in abundance at the Macari Site had a number of uses. Hammers were used in food preparation to crush maize and hominy kernels as well as food tubers. Hammers were also needed to roughen the worn down grinding surface of milling stones. Sinew was pounded with hammers in order to allow the bundles of sinew in tendons to be 89 teased into individual fibers. Sinew was used for bowstrings, fishing line and other strong threads and lines. Native American baskets from Long Island were well known for their quality (Harrington, 1924 : 48, fig. 20; Stone, 1983 : 291-293) and some of these hammers could have been used to make basket splints of swamp maple and hickory logs: "Four foot logs are hammered until the grain separates, then strips are pulled off. These are shaved with a spoke shave until they are smooth" (Speck, 1909 : 189) . Baskets produced by these techniques were made and traded by their makers as late as 1773 when "Peter Gonoe Indian" paid a bill to the Havens store on Shelter Island with a basket worth one shilling threepence (Lamont, 1975: 10) . The skillful bifacial reduction technique used in manufacturing projectile points was evidenced in test holes from the Macari parcel. No projectile points were found in the artifact assemblage from the positive test holes on the Macari Site parcel. However, projectile points were recovered from plowed soil north of Laurel Lake and north of the pond east of Kirkup Lane during farming from 1926-1970 (Interview with B. Jazombek, June, 1990) . The shapes of projectile points found on the Macari parcel during farming by the Jazombeks indicate episodes of activity on the site during the Paleo-Indian, Archaic, Orient and Woodland periods at various times within the first 10, 000 years of Long Island's human occupation. A number of activities are indicated by the artifacts found 90 on the Macari parcel. Woodworking is suggested by the axes and wood splitting wedge found on the site. Food preparation, raw material processing and basketry are suggested by the hammerstones and pestles which were the most common artifacts found on the site. Stoneworking, including arrowhead manufacture and resharpening is shown by the flaked quartz pebbles, cores and flakes. During the 1600's wampum manufacture was a major activity in Long Island forts. Stone drills have been found in sites of this period (Smith, 1950: 119-120) . Quartz drills from Test holes G12, G13 and M20 have rounded, polished tips characteristic of stone tools used to drill shell. 91 V. CONCLUSIONS. The Macari Site parcel is located within one mile of potentially important Native American sites and villages in Mattituck and Laurel. Evidence of prehistoric activity on the parcel was found in subsurface testing. Two perennial surface water sources are found within and immediately adjacent to the parcel, and this factor would encourage seasonal or permanent settlement on the site. Significant evidence of historic period activity on the Macari Site was not identified. The site has been intensively farmed for more than 40-50 years and plowing has had an impact on the sensitivity and integrity of the uppermost levels of buried archaeological sediments from prehistoric layers in many areas of the site. In summary, the presence of prehistoric artifacts and evidence of stone working in test holes from the Macari Site prehistoric material is present. Hammers, drills, flaked stone cores and flakes and other stone artifacts recovered from the loam, sand and gravels in plowsoil and below the plowzone in test holes include tools lost or discarded during episodes of prehistoric activities that took place on the site. Two limited areas of potentially intact prehistoric sediments were delineated 1) in the western portion of the site adjacent to the kettlehole with standing water (Transects 92 E, F and G) and 2) on the southernmost edge of the site near Laurel Lake (Transect V) . Stone drills used for perforating and shaping wampum shell were recovered from Test holes G12 and G13 . These test holes provide evidence of an activity not common elsewhere on the Macari Site. The area of prehistoric sensitivity on the southern portion of the Macari Site parcel along transect V is limited to the small exposure of HaB loam evidenced on the site-specific soil map (Figure 4 and Figure 19) . Test holes dug along the S and T transects were uniformly negative (Figure 19) . Limited sensitivity was found along the eastern portions of transects H, I, L, M and O, although these finds were made in soils which had been disturbed by bulldozing in search of the undercarriage of the 1958 crashed military airplane and its load of warheads, in addition to plowing. Further limited subsurface excavation in order to fully expose specific areas of sediments below the existing plow zone is needed to define the limits of the site. The presence or absence of activities such as occupancy, farming and waste disposal; the integrity of the site after at least a half century of cultivation and plowing; and areas of secondary disturbance and redeposition of artifacts could also be determined from additional field work. 93 APPENDICES APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF POSITIVE TEST HOLES AND SELECTED NEGATIVE TEST HOLES: MACARI AT LAUREL SITE, SOUTHOLD Test hole B7 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-65cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 65-70cm B very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole C8. Positive: piece of modern coal at -30cm. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . The modern coal in Test hole C8 was found in plowed soil. This coal indicates domestic refuse disposal from the house 100m northeast of this location on Sound Avenue. A-1 Test hole C13 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-75cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) with stones. 75-80cm B very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Stones with plow damage were found at a depth of 60-65cm in Test hole C13 . Cultivation of potatoes resulted in disturbance of soils at this relatively deep level. Test hole D8. Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-5cm dumped yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) dumped on field. 5-35cm plowed dark yellowish brown plowed loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 35-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-2 Test hole D9. Positive: 1920's-1960's white glazed tile fragments (20cm depth) and brick (30-40cm depth) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Modern cultivation was responsible for coal and domestic rubbish from the house 120m north of Test hole D8 present in the plowsoil. Test hole D12 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-80cm B very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) and gravel. A-3 Test hole D15. Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-60cm cow mire loose dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . Test hole D15 is in an area of the site formerly used as cattle pasture. Test hole E2 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-55cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 55-60cm B light yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole E3 . Positive: modern coal and brick fragments in plowsoil (0-30cm) ; large prehistoric granite anvil stone/log splitting wedge with flaked working edge (-50cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . A-4 30-55cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 55-70cm cultural light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole E8 . Positive: modern coal (30-35cm) ; possible prehistoric charcoal or modern tree root (50-65cm) ; prehistoric hammerstone and bifacially flaked quartz (50-65cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-25cm plowed brown loam (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 5/4) . 25-50cm - dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 7 .5YR 4/4) . 50-70cm cultural dark brown loam with artifacts (Munsell soil color 7 . 5YR 4/4) . The prehistoric hammerstone and bifacially flaked quartz found in Test hole E8 were excavated from below plowed soil. Although a fragment of organic material that was identified as charcoal in the field was recovered from the same horizon as the artifacts, this may be a piece of tree root from the stand of timber that covered the Macari parcel until the 1920's and 1930's when the Jazambek brothers cleared the land for farming (conversation with B. Jazambek, June, 1990) . A-5 Test hole E9 . Positive: prehistoric flaked quartz pebble with rounded flake scars (-50cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-50cm B yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 50-80cm cultural yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole E10. Positive: 1 piece of modern clear glass in plowsoil (-10cm) ; 2 broken prehistoric hammerstone/pestles (60-80cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 60cm-1m cultural light yellowish brown clay (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . A-6 Test hole Ell. Positive: piece of modern coal and modern coal cinder (-5cm) ; 2 prehistoric hammerstones (-60cm) ; modern brick fragment (-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color lOYR 4/4) . 30-60cm B strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7 .5YR 5/6) . 60-70cm cultural yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole E12 . Positive: modern clear bottle and plate glass (-10cm) ; modern brick fragment (-15cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole E13 . Positive: 20th century earthenware (-10cm) ; modern brick fragment (-15cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell A-7 soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 70-80cm B very pale brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole E14. Positive: 20th century clear glass and brick (-10cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole E15. Positive: airplane safety glass (-5cm) ; 20th c. coal (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-8 Test hole F2 . Positive: prehistoric flaked stone core (-50cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/3) . 30-60cm cultural yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 60-80cm B light yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . A stony cultural layer found at 50-60cm in Test hole F2 yielded a flaked stone core. Test hole F4 . Positive: modern coal (-40cm) ; prehistoric flaked quartz pebble (-75cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/3) . 30-75cm - yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 75-90cm cultural strong brown sand (Munsell soil color 7/5YR 5/6) with artifacts. A-9 Test hole F5. Positive: charcoal or tree root (-55cm) ; prehistoric hammerstone with battered end in addition to axial break from use (60-80cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown clayey loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-80cm cultural strong brown clayey loam (Munsell soil color 7/5YR 4/6) . Test hole F6. Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown clayey loam (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 4/3) . 30-45cm B strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7 . 5YR 4/6) . 45-60cm B reddish yellow sand (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 6/8) . Test hole F8. Positive: prehistoric quartz flake and prehistoric hammerstone (55-65cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-10 20-60cm plowed strong brown loam (Munsell soil color 7 .5YR 5/6) with pocket of yellow sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/8) . The pocket of sand in the sediment column of Test hole F8 suggests a disturbance of the underlying loam, either due to modern cultivation, or as a result of a prehistoric pit that may have been dug here. Test hole F10. Positive: modern clear glass (10-20cm depth) ; burnt stone (50cm depth) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/6) . 30-65cm crashed yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/8) . When the jet fighter crashed on the farm in 1958, burning fuel and wreckage came to within a few hundred feet of Mr. Ben Jazambek's house situated north of the parcel on Sound Avenue. The burnt stone found at a depth of 50cm in Test hole F10 may result from this event. A-11 Test hole F12 . Positive: prehistoric bifacially flaked quartz with rounded flake scars (50-60cm) ; naturally broken fragment of hematitic rock (60-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/6) . 30-50cm B hard packed yellowish brown clayey loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 50-60cm cultural hard packed yellowish brown clayey loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-70cm B light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole F13 . Positive: modern brick speck (-30cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-70cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 70-80cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-12 Test hole F14 . Positive: prehistoric quartz flake (-40cm) ; prehistoric flaked quartz pebble (50-60cm) ; modern coal (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-50cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color lOYR 5/4) . 50-60cm cultural yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-70cm B brownish yellow sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . Test hole F15. Positive: modern brick at a depth of 10cm. Depth Horizon Description 0-5cm humic very dark grayish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 3/2) . 5-50cm cowmire yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 50-60cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-70cm B brownish yellow sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . Test hole F15 was on the edge of the formerly wooded A-13 pasture on the eastern end of the cultivated field. Although it had not been plowed, the top 50cm appeared to have been disturbed and had no stones. Stones would have been trampled under by cattle during wet spells. The topsoil may also have been sifted to recover fragments of the debris of the wrecked jet whose black box was found in this area of the site in 1958. Test hole G1. Positive: fragment of recent clear glass (-30cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellow brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B strong brown sand (Munsell soil color 7. 5YR 6/8) . Test hole G2 . Positive: modern coal (0-30cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellow brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-70cm B strong brown sand (Munsell soil color 7. 5YR 6/8) . 70-80cm B brownish yellow sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . A-14 Test hole G3 . Positive: prehistoric flaked stone core (-50cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellow brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-60cm cultural strong brown sand (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 6/8) . Test hole G11. Positive: prehistoric bifacially flaked quartz with rounded flake scars (-50cm) ; hematitic rock and prehistoric ground stone axe/adze with use flaking on working edge at depth of 80cm-1m. Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 20-40cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 40cm-1m cultural very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole G12. Positive: prehistoric flaked quartz with slightly eroded and rounded flake scars (10-20cm) ; prehistoric flaked quartz drill (-50cm) . A-15 Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 20-50cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 50-85cm cultural light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole G13 . Positive: prehistoric flaked quartz drill (0-25cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-25cm plowed yellowish brown loam with small stones (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 25-60cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/8) . 60-70cm B pale brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/3) . Test hole H14 . Positive: modern iron nails (-30cm) ; cigarette butt (-40cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-16 40-60cm disturbed brown sandy clay (Munsell soil color 10YR5/3) Test hole H14 was located in the path between two fields on the Macari parcel. Disturbed stratigraphy was noted in the deepest sediments excavated. Test hole H15. Positive: recent brown glass and coal (0-40cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-60cm disturbed brownish yellow loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . Test hole H15 was located in the tractor track between two fields. The lowest level reached had been subjected to ground disturbance resulting from plowing. Test hole H16. Positive: modern clear glass (-20cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-17 Test hole H17. Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed loose dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) 40-60cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole H18. Positive: prehistoric quartz flake fragment in plowsoil (-20cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed loose dark brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-50cm plowed yellowish brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 50-70cm - yellowish brown clay (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . Test hole H18 was located on top of a recent heap of earth thrown up by digging for pieces of the airplane which crashed on the property in 1958. The prehistoric quartz flake found in topsoil came from disturbed soil. A-18 Test hole H19. Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-50cm B brownish yellow sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . 50-70cm B very pale brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole H2O. Positive: eroded 20th century white slipware and prehistoric quartz flake in plowsoil (-30cm) ; hematitic rock and prehistoric hammerstone below plowsoil (60-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-60cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 60-70cm cultural very pale brown loamy sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Modern coal was found on the surface two meters northeast of Test hole H2O. A-19 Test hole I15. Positive: modern coal in plowsoil (-30cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 40-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole I19. Positive: prehistoric flaked stone axe or hoe with worn flake scars (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-50cm B yellowish brown sand and stones (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/8) . 50-60cm cultural yellowish brown sand and stones (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/8) . 60-70cm B very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole I22 . Positive: prehistoric quartz flake in plowsoil (0-40cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil A-20 color 10YR 5/4) . 30-40cm mixed yellowish brown sand and very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . 40-70cm B very pale brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole J17. Positive: piece of metal engine filter from 1958 military jet crash (0-40cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 40-60cm B yellowish brown sandy loam and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole L15. Positive: modern coal in plowsoil (-30cm) ; prehistoric pebble hammerstone below plowsoil (50-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-60cm B yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . A-21 Test hole L18. Possible prehistoric hammerstone/muller below plowsoil (-65cm) ; modern rusted iron in plowsoil (-20cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . 30-45cm B brownish yellow coarse sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/8) . 45-85cm B very pale brown fine sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 7/4) . Test hole L19 . Positive: prehistoric quartz flake below plowsoil (45-50cm) ; flaked quartz pebble hide scraper with rounded edge (-90cm) ; possible pestle with gunge adhering to base (65-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-25cm plowed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/6) . 25-45cm plowed light yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . ' 45-60cm B light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . 60-90cm cultural light yellowish brown sand and gravel (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . A-22 The layer of sand between the cultural layer and the upper part of the B horizon at a depth of 45-60cm in Test hole L19 indicates a period of windblown or erosional aggradation and weathering following the activity that resulted in leaving a residue of cultural debris. Test hole L21. Positive: prehistoric quartz pressure flake below plowsoil (80-85cm) ; burnt stones (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-25cm plowed brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 25-55cm B coarse yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/8) . 55-85cm cultural soft light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole L23 . Positive: near holes dug to remove bayberry bushes by shrub rustlers. Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed dark yellowish brown plowed loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/6) . 30-50cm mixed mixed dark yellowish brown and A-23 yellowish brown loam. 50-55cm B yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 55-70cm B light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . The eastern side of this field is extensively pitted with shovel holes dug to remove bayberry bushes. This has resulted in mixing the top 50cm in Test hole L23. Test holes along the M transect were disturbed at a depth greater than that reached by plowing elsewhere on the site. Inverted stratigraphy with pale brown B horizon soil on top of dark yellowish brown and brown surface soil indicates the impact of digging after the 1958 jet crash. Test hole M16. Positive: modern glass (-15cm) ; metal button or snap with lettering (-15cm) ; modern green Seven-Up bottle glass and clear glass bottle base with molded 119" (20-40cm) ; rusted iron farm machinery bolt (20-30cm) ; modern charcoal. Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed light yellowish brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . 20-40cm plowed dark yellowish brown hard packed loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . A-24 40-65cm disturbed dark yellowish brown silty clay (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . Test hole M17 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-15cm plowed pale brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/3) . 15-30cm plowed brown silty clay (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/3) . 30-80cm disturbed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . Test hole M18. Positive: modern coal and hematitic rock in topsoil (0-15cm) ; 1900-1950 blue painted glazed slipware and coal in plowsoil (-40cm) ; prehistoric flaked quartz with rounded flake scars and modern coal (-65cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 20-80cm disturbed dark yellowish brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 3/6) . A-25 Test hole M20. Positive: prehistoric quartz drill bit in plowsoil (35-40cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-30cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 30-65cm B strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7. 5YR 4/6) . 65-85cm disturbed loose dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . Test hole 012 . Positive: prehistoric quartz pestle/hammerstone (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-50cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 50-75cmcm cultural yellowish brown stony loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . The prehistoric quartz pestle/hammerstone found in Test hole 012 had been abraded on its base from breaking up and grinding roots or corn on a grinding slab. An old break facet found on the base had been partly worn down by grinding; this indicates that the tool had been used both as a hammerstone and grinding tool. A-26 Test hole 016. Positive: prehistoric bifacially flaked quartz pebble (60-75cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-15cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 15-40cm plowed yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 40-75cm cultural light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole 019 . Positive: prehistoric quartz flake fragment in plowsoil (-25cm) ; modern coal (30-50cm) ; prehistoric quartz pressure bladelet (-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 20-40cm plowed yellowish brown loamy sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 40-70cm disturbed brownish yellow sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . 70-80cm B light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . A-27 Although Test hole 019 yielded a pressure bladelet and a quartz flake fragment, modern coal was mixed with the prehistoric material, indicating disturbed stratigraphy in this location. Test hole 020. Positive: prehistoric hammerstone in topsoil (0-20cm) ; possible quartz hammerstone (45-60cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed brown sandy loam with stones (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/3) . 20-40cm plowed strong brown sand (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 5/6) . 40-70cm ?cultural yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/6) . Test hole 021. Possible broken prehistoric hammerstone/muller below plowsoil (40-65cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-15cm plowed pale brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/3) . 15-30cm plowed dark brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 4/4) . A-28 30-65cm ?cultural strong brown sandy loam (Munsell soil color 7.5YR 5/6) . 65-70cm B yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . Test hole S15. Positive: fragment of rubber gasket/valve seal in topsoil (0-20cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-20cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 20-70cm disturbed dark yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 4/4) . Test hole S15 provided further evidence of the 1958 jet crash on the Macari parcel: a fragment of rubber gasket/valve seal found in topsoil at a depth of 0-20cm. Test hole S18. Positive: modern coal (-15cm) ; modern clear plate glass and shell (-30cm) ; modern clear glass pop bottle rim (-40cm) Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . A-29 40-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-75cm B yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 75-85cm B light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole S22 . Positive: prehistoric quartz biface thinning flake in plowsoil (-20cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-40cm plowed yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/4) . 40-60cm B yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole V19. Positive: prehistoric flaked quartz (60-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-60 - light yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-80cm plowed light yellowish brown sand and rocks (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . A-30 Test hole V20. Positive: prehistoric quartz flake fragment (-65cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-60cm disturbed loose yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-80cm cultural light yellowish brown sand (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole V21. Positive: prehistoric flaked quartz pebble (-70cm) . Depth Horizon Description 0-60cm disturbed loose yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . 60-90cm cultural light yellowish brown sand and stones (Munsell soil color 10YR 6/4) . Test hole V22 . Negative. Depth Horizon Description 0-80cm disturbed loose yellowish brown loam (Munsell soil color 10YR 5/6) . Test hole V22 was located near the gravel road on the eastern boundary of the Macari parcel; disturbed soil from grading the road was encountered in this shovel probe. A-31 APPENDIX B STATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FORMS REPORT FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD RECONNAISSANCE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FILE/LITERATURE SEARCH REPORT AN D REPORT OF FIELD RECONNAISSANCE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FILE/LITERATURE SEARCH REPORT prepared by:Robert L. Miller Affiliation :Clover Date : August. 1990 Ph.D. Archaeological Services, Inc. A. Project Information Permit Name : Permit No. : Permit Type : Location of Proposed Action: Description of Undertaking: Estimated Size of Impact Area ( acres ) : Description of Impact : Permit Areas ( total acres ) : B . Environmental Information Topography: gently sloping fields near kettle holes Geology: undifferentiated outwash Soils : Haven loam; Plymouth loamy sand; PlymButh gravelly loamy sand; Carver and Plymouth sands; Riverhead sandy loam Drainage: well-drained to excessively-drained Vegetation: mature mixed deciduous forest; formerly cultivated fields Forest Zone : oak and pine Manmade Features and Alterations : plowing; earthmoving to recover parts of jet that crashed on the site in 1958 C . Documentary Research 1 . Site Files (within 1 mile radius ) a. Office of Parks , Recreation and Historic Preservation ( OPRHP ) - State Inventory - State Register - National Register - National Register eligible listing - State/National Register proposed Nb . State Museum c. See attached report B-1- 2 . References a. Texts x Beauchamp, William 1900 Aboriginal Occupation of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 32 . Albany, New York (p. ) . Funk, Robert E. 1976 Recent Contributions to Hudson Valley Prehistory. New York State Museum Memoir 22 . Albany, New York (P. ) x Parker, Arthur 1920 The Archaeological History of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin Nos . 237 , 238. Albany, New York (p. ) . x Ritchie, William, A. 1969 The Archaeology of New York State . Natural History Press: Garden City, New York (p. ) . x Ritchie, William A. and Robert E. Funk 1973 Aboriginal Settlement Patterns in the Northeast . New York State Museum and Science Service Memoir No. 7.0 . Albany, New York (p. ) . x Other ( see attached Bibliography) . b. Maps x Beers , F.W. 1873 County Atlas of Suffolk x Burr, D.H. 1829 Atlas of New York State . Stone and Clark, New York. Library of Congress 1981 Fire Insurance Maps in Library of Congress . Stone and Stewart, Publishers 18_ New Topographical Atlas of County. x Other (see attached bibliography) 3 . Previous Surveys None recorded in OPRHP files Survey( s ) completed for project area B-2 Sensitivity Assessment/Site Prediction Prehistoric sensitivity indicated by adjacent freshwater sources, prehistoric sites within one mile, reports of arrowheads and projectile points found on site by farmer and boy scouts 1920-1967 ; low historic sensitivity indicated in archival and map sources. 5 . Recommendations The presence of flaked and ground stone artifacts from a potentially significant multicomponent site with flaked stone artifacts dated about 10 ,000 - 400 years ago indicates further subsurface testing to determine the boundaries, integrity and significance of the site (s) and/or mitigation. 6 . Attachments x Topographic map x Project map/Site plan Environmental Assessment Form State Museum correspondance Site file information Previous survey information x Other ( specify) Geological Map Soil Map Suffolk County Archaeological Sensitivity Map, 1978 August 10, 1990 date signature of preparer B-3 RFPORT OF FIELD RECONNAISSANCT j I Permit Applicant: Permit No.: I Location: Robert L. Miller,Affiliation:Clover Date. Aug. , 199 Report Prepared by: .;,. A rvices'Tnc. Part 1: DOCTTNIENTARY ?RESEARCH ADDENDUM AND SITE InENTIFICA'TTON A. Documentary Research Addendum (if needed) { 1. x Local site inventory checked (specify) I see attached bibliography 2. x Informants interviewed (name, address, specialty) ` see attached bibliography 3. x Other sources checked (specify) see attached bibliography I Results of Documentary Research i no sites reported 2 sites reported (describe briefly) ` Possible multicomponent site indicated by previous discovery of Paleo-Indian, Archaic and Woodland points; two areas of apparently intact stratigraphy at 60-90 cm noted see attached report) H. Field Investigation 1. Methodology a. Description of structure for survey team (number, organization). One New York State certified archaeologist, one staff archaeologist, with 6 field assistants. b. Date of survey and description of general surface and subsurface conditions (including season, ground visibility and relative wetness of soil). June-July, 1990; hard clayey loam over sand c. Description of general soil characteristics, including texture and depth to sterile soil. i See attached report. Depth to sterile soil greater than 1 meter, the maximum depth reached in test holes. i d. outline of field testing strategy, specifying (when used): sampling techniques, surface inspection techniques (transect interval, method of ground examination), subsurface techniques (type. interval and average depth of excavation unit; for screening note size of mesh), remote sensing techniques. With the exception of two test holes which could not be dug because of the young forest growing in fields abandoned c. 1958 ; the entire area slated for development was tested in a 20 x 40m grid. Test holes were dug with a shovel and alli sediments were sieved through a 6mm (1/4" ) mesh. Test holes were dug to a minimum depth of 60cm. i i I . e. Description of intensity of coverage and rationale for excluding areas ` from survev. Attach a map with location and type of each ex- cavation unit: areas surface inspected. Any areas not surveyed i should be clearly delineated. I A.20 x 40m grid was used for the subsurface testing, excluding ! areas of fresh water wetlands and open spaces not slated for development. f i f. Description of problems encountered during survey which may have influenced results. I NA i i Results of Field investigation i no sites identified i 1 or more site(s) identified Describe general nature and distribution of sites Artifact concentrations were found north of Laurel Lake and north of a kettle hole with standing water; artifacts i included hunting, woodworking and shell drilling stone tools in addition to stone tools used in food processing. I • For each site, complete a site inventory form (OPRHP), providing ' general boundaries and information on nature of the site (e.g. lithic scatter, historic midden, rockshelter). 'Mark form "Confi- dential: For ALgency Use Only". 2. Recommendations no additional work I . - additional investigation X project modification to avoid sites 3. Rationale - a. Evaluate the effect of the proposed undertaking on identified cultural resources. i • If cultural resources are present but will not be impacted ` explain why. ' I • If cultural resources will be impacted, explan how each will be affected. B-6 i z i i b. Describe possible precautions, protective measures or project modi- fications which would avoid or alleviate these impacts. I C. Identify sites and/or areas which require additional study. I i i d. Outline nature and extent of additional investigations) recom- mended. . 1 Subsurface testing and trench excavation to delineate extent of site and integrity of deposits and/or mitigation as determined by the Town of Southold. i i I ' I END PART 1 If site evaluation is not completed at this time, proceed to PART 3. B-7 REFERENCES Ales, M.F. 1979. A History of the Indians on Montauk, Long Island. Readings in Lona Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory Volume III. Ginn Cusom Publishing, Lexington, Massachusetts. Bayles, R.M. 1874. Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk County and its Towns, Villages, Hamlets, Scenery, Institutions and Important Enterprises. Port Jefferson, New York. Bear, Joy. 1981. Historic Houses of the North Fork and Shelter Island. The Suffolk Times, Greenport, Long Island, New York. Beauchamp, W.M. 1900. Aboriginal Occupation of New York. Bulletin of the New York State Museum. Vol. 7, no. 32 (1978 reprint, AMS Press, New York) . Booth, Nat E. 1949. The Archaeology of Long Island. In James E. Truex (ed) . 1982 . The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader: 1900 to the Present. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Vol. V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn, Lexington, Massachusetts. Boyd, Glenda F. 1962 . The Transitional Phase on Long Island. In James E. Truex (ed) . 1982 . The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader: 1900 to the Present. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Vol. V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn, Lexington, Massachusetts. Case, Albertson, Mary Case Berresford Sinclaire, and Sara Case Faulkner. 1876. Historical Sketch of Southold Town. Reprinted by Friends of the Southold Free Library, Southold, L. I. , New York. Ceci, Lynn. 1977. The Effect of European Contact and Trade on the Settlement Pattern of Indians in Coastal New York, 1524 - 1665: The Archaeological and Documentary Evidence. PhD dissertation, City University of New York, Department of Anthropology. University Microfilm, Ann Arbor, Michigan. R1 Ceci, L. 1979. Reconstructing Indian Culture on Long Island: Fisher's Study of the Montauk. In Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory Volume III. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts: 8-12 . Chapman, Mary Haldane. 1965. This Was Southold. In A Summer of History: Official Program, Town of Southold 325th Anniversary Celebration. Southold, Long Island, New York. Craven, Charles E. 1906. A History of Mattituck, Long Island, New York. Privately published. Dana, E.S. and Ford, W.E. Original publication 1932. A Textbook of Mineralogy. 4th ed. 1969 reprint. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , New York. Denton, D. Original publication 1670. A Brief Description of New York Formerly Called New Netherlands with the Places Thereunto Adjoining. Likewise a Brief Relation of the Customs of the Indians There. in C. Jaray (ed. ) 1968 . Historic Chronicles of New Amsterdam, Colonial New York and Early Long Island. I.J. Friedman Inc. , New York. Flint, Martha Bockee. 1896. Long Island before the Revolution. Reprinted 1967 by Ira J. Friedman, Inc. Port Washington, New York. Friends of the Mattituck Free Library, Vol. II. 1986. Penny Lumber and Flooring Centers. Article in Suffolk Times, March 28, 1985. Reproduced in Back over the Years: Reminiscences of Mattituck in the Early Years of the Twentieth Century. Bound typescript in Mattituck Free Library. Fuller, M.L. 1914. Geology of Long Island, New York. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington. Gardiner, Lion. 1660. Relations of Pequot Warres. Reprinted 1901 by Acorn Club, Hartford, Connecticut. Gildersleeve, Donald. 1967 . Mattituck in the 180's and 901s: Talk at the Mattituck Historical Society. In Friends of the Mattituck Free Library. 1986. Back over the Years: Reminiscences of Mattituck in the Early Years of the Twentieth Century, Vol. VI. Bound typescript in Mattituck Free Library. R2 Hall, Warren. 1975. Pagans, Puritans and Patriots of Yesterday's Southold. New Suffok Historical Society, Cutchogue, Long Island, New York. Hallock, Ella B. 1915. The Story of the 275th Anniversary Celebration of the Founding of Southold Town. Doubleday, Page and Company, Garden City, New York. Harrington, M.R. 1924. An ancient village site of the Shinnecock Indians. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers vol. 22, pt. 5. Reprinted in G.S. Levine (ed. ) , 1977. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory vol. I. Suffolk County Archaeological Association, Stony Brook, New York: 30-64. Hayes, R.O. 1983 . Ethnographic Studies of the Shinnecock, in G. Stone (ed) . The Shinnecock Indians: A Culture History. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts: 331-335. Howell, G.R. 1887. The Early History of Southampton, Long Island, New York. Weed, Parsons and Company, Albany, New York. Jefferson, Wayland. 1932 . Southold and Its People in the Revolutionary Days. L.I. Traveler Print, Southold, New York. Jenson, H.M. and J. Soren, 1974 . Hydrogeology of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington. Kaeser, E. 1974. The Oakland Lake Site (Har-13-4) . In The Coastal Archaeology Reader: Selections from the New York State Archaeological Bulletin 1954 - 1977 . Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts: 263-288. Lamont, H.O. 1975. The Story of Shelter Island in the Revolution. Shelter Island Historical Society, Shelter Island, New York. Latham, Roy. 1953 . Notes on the Orient Focus of Eastern Long Island, New York. In James E. Truex (ed) . 1982 . The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader: 1900 to the Present. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Vol. V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn, Lexington, Massachusetts. R3 Latham, Roy. 1965. Late Indian Graves in Laurel, Long Island, New York. In Gaynell S. Levine (ed) . 1978. The Coastal Archaeology Reader: Selections from the New york State Archaeological Association Bulletin 1954 - 1977. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Vol. II. Suffolk County Archaeological Association, Stony Brook, New York. Mattituck Chamber of Commerce. 1933 . Mattituck and Its Vicinity. Mattituck Press, Mattituck, Long Island, New York. New York State Retired Teachers Association. 1976. Old Schoolhouses, Long Island: Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Bicentennial Project Committee of Long Island Zone, Northport, Long Island, New York. Office of Planning. 1969 . Long Island Landmarks. New York State Office of Planning Coordination, Albany, New York. Onderdonk, Henry. 1849. Revolutionary Incidents of Suffolk and Kings Counties. Reprinted 1970 by Ira J. Friedman Division of Kennikat Press, Port Washington, New York. Parker, A.C. 1920. The Archaeological History of New York. Part 2 . VI. Archaeological Localities of the State of New York. New York State Bulletin Nos. 237-238: 471-724 . Pelletreau, W. 1903 . A History of Long Island from its Earliest Settlement to the Present Time. Lewis Publishing Company, Chicago and New York. Prime, N.S. 1845. History of Long Island. Robert Carter, New York. Reeve, Irma and Ralph W. Tuthill. 1978. Mattituck Oral History: Old houses. Interview transcript in Friends of the Mattituck Free Library. 1986. Back over the Years: Reminiscences of Mattituck in the Early Years of the Twentieth Century, Vol. II. Bound typescript in Mattituck Free Library. Reeves, H.A. 1885. The Commerce, Navigation and Fisheries of Suffolk County. In Bi-Centennial History of Suffolk County. Budget Stream Print, Babylon, New York. Ritchie, W.A. 1953 . Indian History of New York State. Part III The Algonkian Tribes. New York State Museum and Science Service, Albany, New York. R4 Ritchie, William A. 1954. The Enigmatic Orient Culture (Abstract) . In Gaynell S. Levine (ed) . 1978. The Coastal Archaeology Reader: Selections from the New York State Archaeological Association Bulletin 1954 - 1977. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Vol. II. Suffolk County Archaeological Association, Stony Brook, New York. Ritchie, W.A. 1971. A Typology and Nomenclature for New York Projectile Points. Revised ed. New York State Museum & Science Service, Bulletin Number 384 . Albany, New York. Ritchie, W.A. 1980. The Archaeology of New York State. Harbor Hill Brooks, Harrison, New York. Salwen, Bert. 1962 . Sea Levels and Archaeology in the Long Island Indians. In James E. Truex (ed) . 1982. The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader: 1900 to the Present. Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistorv, Vol. V. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn, Lexington, Massachusetts. Saxon, W. 1973. The Palaeo-Indian on Long Island. The Coastal Archaeology Reader: Selections from the New York State Archaeological Bulletin 1954 - 1977. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts: 70-78. Silkworth, A.H. 1910. Mattituck and Eastern Long Island Realty. Long Island Real Estate, Mattituck, Long Island, New York. Smith, C.S. 1950. The Archaeology of Coastal New York. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, Vol. 43 , Part 2: 91-200. Solecki, Ralph. 1950. The Archaeological Position of Historic Fort Corchaug, Long Island and Its Relation to Contemporary Forts. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut, No. 24 : 3-40. Speck, F.G. 1909. Notes on the Mohegan and Niantic Indians. In C. Wissler (ed. ) . The Indians of Greater New York and the Lower Hudson. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, vol. III. New York: 181-210. Stone, G. 1983 . Readings in Long Island Archaeology and Ethnohistory Vol. 6, The Shinnecock Indians: A Culture History. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn R5 Custom Publishing, Massachusetts. Stone, G. 1989. Long Island as America: A New Look at the First Inhabitants. The Long Island Historical Journal. Spring 1989. Volume 1/2 : 159-169. Strong, J.I. 1983 . The Evolution of Shinnecock Culture. In G. Stone (ed) . The Shinnecock Indians: A Culture History. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts: 7-52 . Thompson, B.F. 1918. History of Long Island. 3rd edition. R.H. Dodd, New York. Tooker, W.W. 1911. The Indian Place Names on Long Island. New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Suffolk County. New York. Washington, D.C. Viemeister, August. 1974 . An Architectural Journey through Long Island. Kennikat Press, Port Washington, New York. Whitaker, Epher and Charles E. Craven. 1931. Whitaker's Southold. Edited by Charles E. Craven. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Wood, Silas. 1828. A Sketch of the First Settlement of the Several Towns on Lona Island. Reprinted in 1968 by Ira J. Friedman, Port Washington, New York. Wyatt, R.J. 1982 . The Archaic on Long Island. The Second Coastal Archaeology Reader: 1900 to the Present. Suffolk County Archaeological Association. Ginn Custom Publishing, Massachusetts. Youngs, Selah. 1907. Youngs Family: A History and Genealogy. New York. R6 INTERVIEWS Guide at Conklin House, Bethpage, 1990 Benjamin Jazombek, neighbor and former owner of Macari property. Thomas Lynch, former employee at Bidwell Winery Barbara and Robert Sayre, neighbors of Macari property. Salesperson, Lenz Winery, 1990 R7 MAPS CONSULTED 1988 Hagstrom of Suffolk County 1978 Archaeologically Sensitive Zones in Suffolk County Map. (Suffolk County Archaeology Association) 1975 Suffolk County Soil Map. 1974 Geology of Long Island (Jenson and Soren, 1974) . 1956 U.S.G.S. Topographic Map. 1929 1909 Hyde Map. 1896 Hyde Map. 1873 Beers Map. 1858 Chace Map. 1836 Colten Map. 1836 U.S. Coastal Map. 1829 Burr Map. 1779 Fadden Map. 1776 Lotter Map. 1675 Ryder Map. R8 APPENDIX C TEST HOLES McDONALD GEOtSCLFNCE Box 1000 • Southold,New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&Y 37-1963 Surveyor: mY Location: Mattituck Tax Map Number: 1000-121--4-9 Project Description: Engineering Date: 3/27/88 Dark brown loam 8" Brown silty loam 2.5' Pale brown coarse sand 43' Comments: Monitor Well seta. See monitor •«eli lata ror -,r t?r Snvei McDONALD GEOSCMNCE Box 1000 a Southold,New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&Y 87-1963 *1 Surveyor: Y&Y Location: Mattituck Tax Map Number: 1000-124-4-9 Project Description: Engineering Date: 3/27/88 Dark brown loam 6" Brown clayey loam Broom loamy clay 'Pals brown coarse sand. 28, Comments: Monitor well set. See rlonitor well lata "or water leve!. McDONALD GEOSCIENCE Box 1000 • Southoid,New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&Y 87-'%i 41*2 Surveyor: Y&Y Location: Mattitue< Tax Map Number: 1000-121-4-9 Project Description: Engineering Date: 3/27/98 Brown loam 10" Brown sandy loam ?ale brown coarse sand 3/ Comments: Monitor .yell set.3ee monitor ;,cell '.ata For grater 3VNZ 'ew1 McDONALD GEOtSCIENCE Box 1000 • Southold,New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&Y 97-1963 Surveyor: Y&Y Location: Mattituck Tax Map Number: 1000-121-4--9 Project Description: Engineering Date: 3/27/88 Brown loam 8 Brown sandy loom Pale brown coarse sand 43' Comments: Monitor well set. See wmitor jell !ata -or -,,ater tevel. McDONALD GEOtSCMVCE Box 1000 • Southold.New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: MY 8''-1953 V, Surveyor: Y&Y Location: Mattituck Tax Map Number: 1000-121-4-9 Project Description: Engineering Date: 4/13/38 Brown silty loam Hale brown coarse szm! 43' Comments: Monitor well set. San monitor well lata for :star le-%mi. McDONALD GEOSCMVCE Box 1000 • Southold,New York 11971 • (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&" %-'9v, Surveyor: "&`-' Location: Yo.ttituc�: Tax Map Number: 1000-121-41-9 Project Description: nigineering Date: 4/14/88 Jar t. brmri loam rro-n sa7,3loan Pale brown coarse sane Comments: Monitor well sem:. See monitor well rata for water lmft�l. McDONALD GEOSCMVCE Box 1000 • Southold,New York 11971 a (516)765-3677 TEST HOLE DATA SHEET Name: Y&Y 97-;953 x7 Surveyor: y&Y Location: Mattituck Tax Map Number: 1000-121-4-9 Project Description: trigineer6nc? Date: = 1/' ?/SS DaVc gown san2v loam $31, Pale brown coarse sand (slicr+t show fines) -71 Grey clay g' Comments: Monitor Well set. See _ronitor well ''ata `or 'fatAr Laurel Lake FIGURE C-1 M U C N -J N 4-d C O R O � M II c N r_{ .L ... O r-1 Ln T � I t Q M N `c Vertical Elevation "' Vertical Elevation Gl Ol Ul Ql m Ol Ul Ul U N W CD f-+ N W -f: O f✓ r ■ N II O W �$ O rt 0p tfi rt d -ag `. m rt a n laurel lake Laurel Lake H G1 C N n I N -7Z 2cl•70 Z-q. 86 36.65 36-s7 -Lq.s(�;, Z4.76c. `�/3 38. s l 19• S-Z, Z4.-14 36 ,S2- 4/14, 38•,49 29. 5 2. Z-4.72� M. S4 `09 38.45 Zcl.47 24. 71 30.49 45.39 13. fz x.21 �s Z� 3f;•4IZ- I Z9.4 Z-q- I -?, 36.y�} JOSEpf-( M&CAlz/ L/�1J2� C. , /�• Y, 0 s.qo 5.96:1 G,ol 5,�� Go y�g t.o► (S',05 4/(3 G.o? G ,off S.q$ G .07 4/1 6 x.09 6, Ob G,oS 41m G-' ,13 �. b( C . to 6,19 S S ' G.C)q /zz7/q/22- 7/Z.-7 Z7 `1 �. l ro G . 00 S C.rl 0 Z G J o s L-Pt f MACAR-1 ,v2�c. , /r. y. APPENDIX D TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC STUDY OF MACARI AT LAUREL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MATTITUCK , NEW YORK Prepared by : EDWARD J. SHARSKY, P E.,PC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS JULY, 1990 TRAFFIC STUDY OF MACARI AT LAUREL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MATTITUCK , LONG ISLAND August 1990 t•�" ' RQ� •`�� V V � RO p CAPTAIN KID ESTATES O oR x11953� Q ' „ 4 Y�N►ll C(. MATT ITUCK x o "' o to nat x► • Qure 25 CONSERVAUON ry T AREA A U R E L r'- ' CAN. j K mornriCA � ARM• '' �' �� 25 3 J A msffifuch Y.C.CATNOtIC OAUGNI'ERS Of AMERICA {'• ,1` - •I LOCATION MAP SITE EDWARD J. SHARSKY, P. E., PC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS NORTHPORT NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No . Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Study Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Field Studies and Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Field Observations and Inventory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Existing Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Volume Capacity Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Data Bank Research. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Project Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Trip Generation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Capacity Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Site Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Internal Circulation and Parking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Appendix INTRODUCTION This report sets forth the results of a traffic engineer- ing study of a proposed residential development in Mattituck, Long Island. The study was conducted to appraise the traffic aspects of the project to determine what impact it would have , if any, on the adjacent streets and properties . The project is known as Macari at Laurel and contemplates the development of 27 single family homes . The site occupies 64 acres of land situated on the south side of Sound Avenue adjacent to Kirkup Lane which will be used to provide access to and from the property. As part of this analysis , several other residential projects in the vicinity of the proposed development were also considered. They included: • Peconic Homes , Inc . 19 single family homes located on the southside of Sound Avenue west of the Macari property. • McFeeley Development 13 single family homes abutting the south side of the Macari site and having frontage along New York State Route 25 . . A.T. Holding Corportion 34 single family homes on the south side of Sound Avenue immediately to the east of the Macari development . • Thornton Estates 35 single family homes on the north side of Sound Avenue opposite the Macari project . The traffic study was undertaken to : Evaluate existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site. Determine the amount of traffic that would be generated by the Macari development and the other projects that were considered. Appraise the ability of the street system to accommodate the additional traffic . Determine the impact that the projects would have on adjacent streets and other properties in the area. Evaluate the need for roadway improvements or traffic controls to accommodate movements in and out of the Macari development . Examine the site plan from the standpoint of adequacy of access to the street system, internal traffic cir- culation, and sufficiency of parking. The report which follows presents the study procedures that were used and the findings and conclusions that were reached. -2- STUDY PROCEDURES Field Studies and Data Collection To meet the objectives of the study , a considerable amount of engineering data was collected. The following is a brief out- line of the work tasks that were undertaken: 1 . Personal field observations to observe traffic movements under various conditions . 2 . Physical inventory of adjacent streets including street widths , pavement markings , parking reg- ulations , traffic controls , speed regulations , and other pertinent information. 3 . Analysis of traffic volume data obtained from the files of the New York State Department of Trans- portation. 4 . Conduct of traffic counts at the principal inter- sections in the vicinity of the site. These were the intersections of Sound Avenue with Bergen Avenue , Kirkup Lane , Cox Neck Road and Middle Road. 5 . Development of hourly traffic movements that would be associated with the several projects , under consider- ation and assignment of this traffic to the street system. 6 . Capacity analyses of the intersections studied under work Item 4 . 7 . Review of the site plan with regard to the parking layout , on-site traffic circuation, and location and design of the access to the external roadway system. Field Observations and Inventory It has been our experience that in addition to the collection and analysis of statistical data, studies such as this require judgements based upon personal observations and experience . Such observations have been made by the consultant . In addition , prior knowledge and familiarity with traffic conditions in the area of the site were of great value in reaching the conclusions that are presented in this report . -3- Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic volume data was collected on a Friday and a Saturday. These days were selected because experience had shown that they were typical of peak traffic conditions in the area. It was also known, from studies of existing similar residential communities , that the peak traffic volumes for such developments typically occur during the morning and evening commuter periods . Examination of the traffic volume data obtained from the State revealed that the morning peak highway hour was considerably less than the comparable peak evening hour . Traffic impact studies are intended to examine the worst case situations . For this reason, detailed traffic counts were made on a Friday from 4 : 00 P.M. to 6 : 00 P.M. In addition , the peak Saturday traffic period was identified as occurring between 12 Noon and 1 P.M. Counts were made during this hour . -4- Volume Cjpacity Analysis The Highway Capacity Manual was used as a guide to appraise the capacity of the street sytem to carry both existing traffic and the traffic that will be generated by the project . The manual is published by the Transportation Research Board which is an element of the National Research Council in Washington , D.C. It was developed as a tool for use by traffic engineers and others . It presents a rational practical method for determinig highway capacities . This publication represents the cooperative efforts of the Transportation Research Board , the engineers and research- ers from the Federal Highway administration , many state and city engineering organizations , universities , and consultants . The manual sets forth various levels of service for both roadways and intersections . The term Level of Service is used to describe conditions on roadways and at intersections . Based upon the geometric characteristics of the street system and the traffic volumes thereon there are six Levels of Service , A through F. Level of Service A represents the highest level of traffic conditions and is descriptive of a situation where free flow exists . Volumes are relatively low and speeds are controlled by the drivers desires and the physical roadway conditions . Level of Service B is a situation of stable flow with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions . Level of Service C is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by higher volumes . Level of Service D approaches unstable flow with tolerable -5- operating speeds being held , though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions . Both Level of Service C and Level of Service D are frequently used for design purposes . Level of Service E represents operations at low operating speeds with volumes at or near capacity. Level of Service F is descriptive of of a forced-flow operation at low speeds . Considerable research has been conducted since the pub- lication of the original Highway Capacity Manual in 1950 . In 1980 , the Transportation Research Board issued , Transportation Research Circular No . 212 , which contained , until recently, the accepted procedures for conducting roadway and intersection capacity analyses . This publication was superseded in 1985 by a new edition of the Highway Capacity Manual . This document contains the state of the art methods for capacity evaluations . This office has the current computer programs which apply the principles con- tained in the 1985 Manual . These computer programs were utilized in this study , and the results are contained in this report . -6- Data Bank Research The data obtained through the field studies were augmented by a considerable amount of related information from this con- sultant ' s files . In recent years , this consultant has been involved in a number of traffic generation studies of proposed and existing residential developments , ranging in nature from one and two bedroom condominium or cooperative developments to three and four bedroom single family home projects . The information collected from these studies was of great value in this analysis . Also valuable data was available from similar studies and research projects as reported by such organizations as the Institute of Transportation Engineers , the Transportation Research Board , various State Departments of Transportation, universities , colleges , and other consulting engineers . -7- EXISTING CONDITIONS Sound Avenue is one of the primary east west streets in this part of Long Island. It is an extension of State Route 25A which runs along the north shore . In the vicinity of the site , it has one lane for moving traffic in each direction. There are additional left turn lanes at Cox Neck Road. The roadway has a speed limit of 40 miles per hour . Kirkup Lane begins at Sound Avenue and runs southerly to Laurel Lake . At present it is a minor roadway that provides access for a few properties that are developed. It is unpaved. Bergen Avenue is a local street which begins at Sound Avenue and extends northerly for a short distance. It then changes to an east-west roadway and terminates at Cox Neck Road. The street has a 30 miles per hour speed limit . Cox Neck Road also begins at Sound Avenue and runs northerly to its intersection with Bergen Road, at which point it splits into two other local streets . Middle Road intersects Sound Avenue just east of Cox Neck Road. It runs in an east-west direction as an extension of Sound Avenue. It is known as New York State Truck Route 25 and County Road 48 . East of Middle Road, Sound Avenue continues in a southeasterly direction towards the business section of Mattituck , where it ends at its intersection with Main Road. It also has a 30 miles per hour speed limit . -8- Land Use The subject property is presently undeveloped. The properties to the east and west of the site are occupied by farm land, a vineyard, and a few residential homes . In addition, there is a roofing, siding and insulation business , plus a nursery, on the southwest corner of Sound Avenue and Kirkup Lane. To the east at Cox Neck Road there is a small retail development which will have ten stores . It is located on the northeast corner of Cox Neck Road and Route 25 . Further to the east there is a small wine garden restaurant situated on the southwest corner of Sound Avenue and Middle Road. A short distance to the west of Cox Neck Road there is a fence and siding business on the south side of Sound Avenue. Traffic Volumes The existing traffic volumes are presented on the following page in Figure 1 . All traffic movements along Sound Avenue are shown from Bergen Avenue to Middle Road. Separate illustrations are provided for each of the two study periods . -9- AbIOA M3N 1dOdH1dON S6=3NI9N= 9N111f1SN00 0d`3d '.INSdVHS r 08VMQ3 N d 00:1 -NOON ZI anOH NV 3 d S3Nn-10A kv anivs ONUSIX3 x �nA( b r Dx c b11 \06 ~--£b 1 0 0 IZI s--99b I •1�--6ZS 4_9Z5 s— Its �+ 4-009 -12 ONnOS 4--9Z(; s--92s 62 (IMI 31001W _b££ • 9Z£—� Obb� 901— �� S9£—b ZS£—I• Z92--_* m 0 9£ £961 rn Z 9 O x z rn m z A D X < O Nd 00 9-00:9 anOH HV3d 9NIN3A3 S3Wnl0A AVON33M ONIISIX3 x �nN3^b n x c 821 �bg �8b I I SI S--00 t, 4 91b —0 •--L£b •J � `-22b i--LZ QNnOS ♦—bLb f--bLb ♦-8Zb 4-109 QV08 Tim iN Z6£--► � I LS£—► 98b—► £6� 81b—♦ Slb-1 91b—* bl Z 6Zb—� II • I SI n ZZ 9£ 9Z m O rn x c� z m M z A 7C D M < v PROJECT TRAFFIC Trip Generation In developing trip generation estimates , the character- istics of the development need to be considered. These are the characteristics which most directly affect trip generation by residential land uses . Car ownerships are important con- siderations since the number of vehicles owned by a household will affect the number of trips that are made . Studies have also shown that income levels , density of development , and household size have direct relationships on the number of auto- mobile trips generated by residential units . There are two procedures that can be used to develop trip generation estimates for a proposed land use . One is to base the trip estimates on studies of comparable existing developments located within environments similar to the one in question. Over the years , this consultant has performed many such studies of residential developments on Long Island and has a substantial amount of information on file . The second method that can be used for estimating vehicular trips is to use data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE) in its publication entitled Trip Generation, 4th Edition. This book contains trip generation rates for many different types of land uses , but they must be applied with care. The data presented is strong in some cases and weak in others , where the study sample sizes are small . In the case of residential land uses , the ITE factors are based upon a con- -10- siderable amount of background studies which have proven to be accurate in the past . Analytical results using ITE information and this consultant ' s file data , when applied to residential uses , yield almost identical trip generation volumes . In this study, average ITE trip generation rates were used as published in the manual . They are as follows : Weekdays Trip Per Dwelling Unit Directional Split Average Daily Trip Ends* 10 . 062 Not Given** Average Trip Ends During Generator AM Peak Hour 0 . 773 27% enter 73% exit Average Trip Ends During Generator PM Peak Hour 1 . 012 63% enter 37% exit Saturday Average Daily Trip Ends 10 . 149 Not Given Average Trip Ends During Generator Peak Hour 0 . 954 53% enter 47% exit * A trip end is either a vehicle departure from a house or a vehicle arrival to a house. ** Over a 24 hour period, arrivals tend to equal departures . A 50% - 50% directional split was used. -11- When applied to each of the residential study projects , the ITE rates yielded the following traffic volumes : Project Weekday Weekday Weekday Saturday Saturday Daily AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Daily Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Macari 272 6 15 17 10 274 14 12 Peconic 191 4 11 12 7 193 10 9 McFeeley 131 3 7 8 5 132 7 6 A.T.Holding 342 7 19 21 13 345 17 15 Thornton 352 7 20 22 13 355 18 15 Figure 2 , which follows , shows the Macari at Laurel weekday and Saturday peak hour volumes distributed to the street system. To analyze the impact that this traffic would have on roadway and intersection capabilities a mid-1992 build year was selected. If the project were approved, it was assumed that the homes would be constructed and occupied by that time. Ambient traffic volumes were projected to the build year by applying a 4 . 2 percent growth factor . This growth factor was based upon a review of New York State Department of Transportation historical traffic data. A second set of capacity analyses were made based upon the development of the Macari at Laurel project plus the other four proposed residential developments . The traffic volumes shown in the preceding table were assigned to the street system and added to the 1990 ambient volumes . -12- G Q Y U 2 W W Z C7 X O W U 0 m I �0 -5 f-5 e ~7 MIDDLE ROAD SOUND I---+ 3—� 9--- 9 3-0 2 5 5 a m � � AVfNVf MACARI AT LAUREL PROJECT WEEKDAY VOLUMES EVENING PEAK HOUR 5:00-6:00 PM c Y Q U 2 W W Z t7 X 0 0 m,L I U O 4-3 4---5 i-5 4"4 MIDDLE ROAD SOUND I— 5—! 5 7 a 4 VC Y MACARI AT LAUREL PROJECT SATURDAY VOLUMES Z PEAK HOUR 12 NOON- 1:00 P M EDWARDJ.SHARSKY, PE.,PC CONSULTING ENGWEERS NORTHPORT NEW YORK Since the Peconic Homes , and A.T. Holding Corporation sites will have access to both Sound Avenue and to Main Road (NYS Route 25 ) the project associated with these two residential areas were assigned to both streets . Based upon the location of the sites and the proximity of the individual plats with respect to the two streets , it was decided that the movements to and from each development would be evenly split between Sound Avenue and Main Road. A similar judgement was made with respect to the McFeely development . In this instance , since the site is located closest to Main Road , only 40 percent of its traffic was assigned to Sound Avenue. With regard to Thornton Estates , its location called for the assignment of all traffic to Sound Avenue. Figure 3 shows future volumes with existing ambient traffic projected to 1990 plus the traffic volumes associated with the five residential sites . -13- Q Y U Z W W 2 0 X cr O w 31 3732 U m 161 2 f--452 1-' � 4--97 4 -449 3 ♦-431 MIDDLE ROAD 29 517-0 SOUND 32_� �► 525-1 3--1 427—• 166 r 2 2 54� 9j� 140 CL z � A�EN�f NOTE DIFFERENCES IN VOLUMES BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS FUTURE WEEKDAY VOLUMES ARE DUE TO MOVEMENTS THAT WILL BE EVENING PEAK HOUR 500-6:00 PM ASSOCIATED WITH ACCESS ROADWAYS FOR PECONIC HOMES THORNTON ESTATES, A.T. (ALL PROJECTS INCLUDED) HOLDING,AND FREELY PROJECTS. 0 Y Q U Z W W = U X cr 22 55 37 O 6I 2 m U 4`+ 41--376f-679 1—' I 4 —III • 4-363 MIDDLE ROAD 30--# 570—* SOUND 26 580—► 9 � 4O9—► 5 B \. /04 0 22 • �� OL A LVIFAl Y FUTURE SATURDAY VOLUMES 3 PEAK HOUR 12 NOON—1:00 P M EDWARDJ.SHARSKY, 3E.,PC (ALL PROJECTS INCLUDED) CONSULTING =NGMERE NORTHPORT NEW 'ORK Capacity Considerations Intersections are usually the limiting factors which de- termine how much traffic a roadway can carry. At intersections , the number of approach lanes , the type of traffic control , and the composition of the traffic flow are the most important elements . Where signals are in operation, the timing schedule is very critical to capacity levels . None of the intersections in the study area are signalized. Right-of-ways are controlled by STOP signs . Intersection capacities were analyzed utilizing the current computer programs for unsignalized locations . For each of the two study periods , analyses were made for the two peak periods of the week , Friday from 5 : 00 P.M. to 6 : 00 P.M. and Saturday from 12 : 00 Noon to 1 : 00 P.M. The capacity analyses looked at existing conditions , future conditions with Macari at Laurel , and future conditions with Macari at Laurel plus the Peconic Homes , Thornton Estates , A.T. Holding, and McFeely projects . The results are shown in the following tables . The computer printouts are contained in the appendix to this report . -14- SOUND AVENUE AND BERGEN AVENUE Weekday Peak Hour Level of Service 5 : 00 PM to 6 : 00 PM Southbound Eastbound Left Right Left Existing B A A Future with Macari B A A Future with all projects B A A Saturday Peak Hour 12 : 00 N to 1 : 00 PM Existing B A A Future with Macari B A A Future with all projects B A A SOUND AVENUE AND KIRKUP LANE Weekday Peak Hour Level of Service 5 : 00 PM to 6 : 00 PM Northbound Westbound Left Right Left Existing B A A Future with Macari B A A Future with all projects B A A Saturday Peak Hour 12 : 00 N to 1 : 00 PM Existing A A A Future with Macari B A A Future with all projects B A A -15- SOUND AVENUE AND COX NECK ROAD Weekday Peak Hour Level of Service 5 : 00 PM to 6 : 00 PM Southbound Eastbound Left Right Left Existing B A A Future with Macari C A A Future with all projects C A A Saturday Peak Hour 12 : 00 N to 1 : 00 PM Existing C A A Future with Macari C A A Future with all projects C A A SOUND AVENUE AND MIDDLE ROAD Weekday Peak Hour Level of Service 5 : 00 PM to 6 : 00 PM Northbound Westbound Left Right Left Existing B A A Future with Macari C A A Future with all projects C A A Saturday Peak Hour 12 : 00 N to 1 : 00 PM Existing B A A Future with Macari C A A Future with all projects C A A -16- A review of the information in the foregoing tables reveals that the study intersections are currently operating at high Levels of Service and are within their traffic carrying capabili - ties . They will continue to do so in the future should the Macari at Laurel project by approved. The street system can also accommodate traffic from the other four residential developments . The minor changes in Level of Service that will occur in a few instances will be due to the normal growth pattern in the area and in traffic associated with the residential projects . -17- SITE CONSIDERATIONS Access to the Macari homes will be by way of Kirkup Lane. It should be improved and paved to town standards . A single travel lane in each direction would be sufficient to accommodate the movements to and from the site. If sufficient right-of-way exists in the vicinity of Sound Avenue , a second northbound exit lane would be adviseable. While such an additional lane is not required to accommodate traffic it would separate northbound left and right turns at the intersection to facilitate these movements . Studies were conducted on Sound Avenue at the location of a proposed access driveway. These studies were designed to evaluate the safe opportunities in the traffic flow on Sound Avenue for vehicles to enter and depart from the proposed access . The number , duration, and frequency of safe gaps in the traffic flow on Sound Avenue were measured and recorded during both peak study periods . Safe gaps in traffic are a function of traffic volumes , vehicle speeds and vehicle grouping or platooning. For left turns from westbound Sound Avenue into the site and right turns out of the site to travel eastbound on Sound Avenue , safe gaps will be needed in the eastbound flow. The study recorded 168 safe gaps averaging over 18 seconds in this direction during the Friday peak hour . On Saturday, 194 safe gaps averaging more than 14 seconds were recorded. The turns described require only a five second gap in traffic . For left turns from the site to proceed westbound on Sound Avenue , gaps in -18- both the east and westbound direction are required. During the Friday peak 190 such gaps , with an average duration of more than 11 seconds , were recorded. On Saturday, the number of gaps observed amounted to 185 with an average duration of more than 9 seconds . The results of the safe gap studies showed that traffic will be able to enter and leave the site safely and that traffic signal control will not be required. STOP or YIELD signs are recommended to establish a positive right-of-way control . Consideration was also given to the need for roadway improvements along Sound Avenue to accommodate Macari at Laurel traffic movements at Kirkup Lane. The site distance at Kirkup Lane is sufficient for the turning movements that will take place and as the traffic flow study showed these movements will take place with little or no delay. In the long term, it would be desireable to improve the horizontal and vertical alignments of Sound Avenue as part of an overall program to upgrade this street . The improvements , however , are not needed or warranted because of the Macari at Laurel project . Internal Circulation and Parking The internal roadway will be constructed in accordance with town standards . It is designed to provide quick and easy access to each residential site . There will also be a connecting roadway to the Peconic Homes Development which will have its own access to -19- Sound Avenue . The internal connection between the two develop- ments will further facilitate the disbursement of traffic to the external street system. On site parking will be provided as required by the town. It will be sufficient to meet the needs of both residents and visitors . No separate off-street parking areas will be required. -20- CONCLUSIONS After careful consideration of all of the information collected, examined, and evaluated as part of this study and the facts that have evolved from the analytical procedures used , the following conclusions have been reached: 1 . The proposed Macari at Laurel development will add very little additional traffic to the street system. 2 . The street system has the capacity to accommodate the traffic that would result from the homes . 3 . Traffic from the other four projects can also be accommodated. 4 . Traffic will be able to enter and leave the site safely and without undue delay. 5 . There will be no adverse traffic impact on adjacent streets , intersections , or properties . 6 . There will be no serious conflicts between project traffic and traffic associated with other land uses in the area. 7 . The character of the street system and adjoining communities will not be altered. 8 . The single access driveway to Sound Avenue is capable of handling the flow of traffic in and out of the site . 9 . Other than adding STOP or YIELD signs to control vehicles leaving the site , no additional traffic control measures or roadway improvements are required. For all the above reasons , it is concluded that the develop- ment plans are sound from a Traffic Engineering standpoint . -21- APPENDIX NEW YORK STATE TRAFFIC DATA OBS ' 9 uLE19 SIV101 0 L L u9 aL— LL Ullul3 AV3d u9L u L L LL —OL 531uLa 0 L L OL- 6 Uva u0a 6-8 OUd u V a El 09E U 6a L-9 UES u 'Jk; 9-ri 0 aS 9—p 06v 0Sv v—E 0LV u 6 v E—a Utry U L z- L u0v u L—aL lJ d UOE ' 0L 09v OBE aL—LL lUVV ' 1S3 0Lv OOV LL—OL UvE u 6E 0 L- 6 u6u ' aL OLE uLE 6-8 1V101 AIIVU ULE uEv 8—L u9L ULE L-9 0L UUL y—S ua 09 9—V Oz 0a V—E 0E 0a E—a 0E OL Z— L SBLOLvOLO 9alU 08 Oa L—aL 311VI4 3113 OII(1OB13V3 all flull1S311 IJV S 8 6 L Allll' 180d3U A18110N UVOU tlIVll AVON3314 39VU3AV 01 311V1 UU111V1l IJOIlV1UUdStIVUl dU 1d30 9Z 31110U 31V1S AUOA t:13N O O m m V m G1 A W rt7 117 0 O m m V m cn A W N ..a 117 > m > r N -s O N O > m - < o m o m m c a m > -1 < m r 0 O O > < m > m CA m z 7e -4 a m O m m a Cn V W V CD A A CJI m w W A cn -> p W O W V 0 O m O 1 o m o V " A o o m M CO w m m m N O m W V A M C O 7c m > + O -4 > > m � 1 1 m In n m N N W A A A A A W W W W W N m O N V V W m O — o m N -i m m © A W m m m N O 1V tV V W C71 '7 O CJI N m M N D O m M W V V C z :T a 3 C- > �t c r ' -i a 3 o m m r > N m S V N CJI O CJI m a -i M 14 m o m > r > m a m ., m o > C3 o > 2 m UI J m --I A V > V 'M m T1 C O W 7 O --1 0 a -i -I > v m r m m m TRAFFIC FLOW STUDIES Summary of eastbound gaps on Sound Avenue In front of site for left turns in and right turns out Friday Evening Peak Hour 5 : 00 P.M. - 6 : 00 P.M. Percent of time available for turns = 85 . 06% Total gap time = 51 . 03 minutes Number of gaps = 168 ' Average length of gap = 18 . 2 seconds Range of gaps 5 to 10 seconds = 60 11 to 20 seconds = 54 21 seconds and over = 54 Summary of two-way gaps on Sound Avenue In front of site for left turns out Friday Evening Peak flour 5: OU P.M. - 6 : 00 P.M. Percent of time available for turns = 62t Total gap time = 37 . 4 minutes Number of gaps = 190 Average length of gap = 11. 3 seconds Range of gaps 5 to 10 seconds = 123 11 to 20 seconds = 46 21 seconds and over = 21 Summary of eastbound gaps on Sound Avenue In front of site for left turns in and right turns out Saturday Peak flour 12 Noon - 1 : 00 P.M. Percent of time available for turns = 80% Total gap time = 47 . 80 minutes Number of gaps = 194 Average length of gap = 14 . 7 seconds Range of gaps 5 to 10 seconds = 96 11 to 20 seconds = 54 21 seconds and over = 44 Summary of two-way gaps on Sound Avenue In front of site for left turns out Saturday Peak Hour 12 Noon - 1 : 00 Y.M. Percent of time available for turns = 596 Total gap time = 35 . 2 minutes Number of gaps = 185 Average length of gap = 9 . 6 seconds Range of gaps 5 to 10 seconds = 107 11 to 20 seconds = 58 21 seconds and over = 20 CAPACITY ANALYSIS EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZFD [NTFPSFrTIONS Pagp 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----- `�------------- ------ - --------0------------------------------- AVERA8E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAk' HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10000() NAME OF lHE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCV ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUlH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. . P. C . DATE OF THE ANAi \ SI9 ' mm/'1d /v`' ` . . . . . . TIME PEPIOD ANALYZ['D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 5-6 PM WEE[ DAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FYISTINb / ONDITION5. INTERSECTION TYPF AND / l]NTRDL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTEPSE[TION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EASl /WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFI[ VOLUMFS _ __ _____ _ _ ___ ________ _______ _ _____________ _____________ EB WB NB SB _......... LEFT 20 o -- 1 THRU 47J 414 - U RIGHT o j - - 15 NUMBFR OF LANES ------------ -- -------- ---------- ---------------------------- ED WB N8 S8 LANES ADJUSFM[Nl FALTO�S Page .______________________________ -� PFPrrNT Pl/i|{T TURN / i/RR PADIUq / ft / A[CELFPATION LANE OPADF ANGLE FnR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - - ---------------- _______________-_ EASTBOUND 0. 0() '/o 20 N WESTBOUND no q« �/� N NORTHBOUND - --- --- -__ SOUTHBOUND 0, 75 50 N VEHICLE LOM���ITION _____ _ _________________ --------------- % ____________% nU TPU[| S % / UURINATION AND RV' 9 VR1I[iFS % MOTORrYCLES ' -- ________ EASTBOUND 5 � 0 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL dAP9 TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1"+2 ) VAiUF ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ___________ ___________ MINOP RIGHTS .1.C) Q. 5. 0V MAJOR LE[-TS EB 5. 2() 3. J0 0. 0o 5. ��0 MINOR LEFTS 9B 7. 4'/ 7. 4�� IDENTIFYING IN[-OPMATION _ ___________________________________ __ NAME OF THE FAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/qOUTH STPEET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . "8-"2-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEVDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FXISTING rONDITIONS. CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF- SFRVIrE Page -3 ______________________ _ _____ ___________ ___________________________ PDTEN— A/ 7UAi ' FLOW— [IAL MOVEMENT PESEPVE RATE LAPA/ ITY [APArITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v/ prph ) ' ( pcoh ) '' ( ocph , c ( pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 4"8 398 398 1 397 1 B ` 720 } 703 >A RIGHT 16 761 761 761 745 ` A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 76() 76U 760 728 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET' . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FYISTING CONDITIONS. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED IN"IERSECfIONS Paue-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULAT ION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I0OC)GC► NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRE.ET. . . . . . . KIRKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYSf. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHNRSKY P. E. . P. L. DA1 E OF THE ANALYSIS (rnrn/dd/vv) . . . . . . 08-02-90 TIME PERIOD ANPLYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION TYGSE AND LONT ROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR S `REST DIRELTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYNE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAt=FIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NP SP LEFT G 3 1 -- THRU 473 415 Q -- RIGHT 0 tt 1 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 -- ADJUS f MEN F FA(:: (UkS page-e- --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION CANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. 00 9020 N WES FBOUND 0. oC► 90 0 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- _ VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EAS FBOUND 5 5 �► WESTBOUND 5 5 �► NORTHBOUND 1 1 Q SOUTHBOUND --- --- C.RITICAL DAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL VAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NH 6. 10 6. 1 C► 0. 00 5. c►G MAJOR LEFTS WN 5. 20 5. 30 0. UC► 5. V0 MINOR LEFTS NH 7. 40 7. 40 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE E5 CSOUND AVE3 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH S'FRF-E'F. . . . KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANHLYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OFHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pane-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RAFE CAPALIZY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMEN( v (Acph) c (ocph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS D M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 1 4u(-) 399 > 399 ) 398 ) B > 506 > 504 )A RIGHT 1 691 691 > 691 > 690 > A MAJOR STREET W8 LEFT 4 691 691 691 688 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF TmE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 CSOUND AVE] NOME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . K I RKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OFHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe—i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10(,)Cl()C) NAME OF THE EAST/WES I' 'S TREE T. . . . . . . . . NYS -TRUCK ROUTE 25 LSOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SUUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD iIHNIc 0 i Fig. ANHLYS 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHAKSKY P. E. , P. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rnrn/dd/vv) . . . . . . 08-02-3C► TIME PERIOD ANALYZED). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 FSM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTICIN TYNE AND CONFRUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WES-T CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIUN l RAI F I C VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NLS SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 27 G -- 58 THRID 447 392 RIGHT C) 93 -- 26 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EES WB NB SP ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 -- ADJUS fMEN f FACTORS Paue --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT "TURN CURB RADIUS (fit) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. 0090E0 N WESTBOUND C►. C►u 90 EC► N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- _ SUUTHBOUND 0. ut► 90 EC► N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOI ORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBUUND 5 5 �> WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 (► CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR R1GHiS SB 6. 10► 6. 10 u. uC► 5. c O MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 60 `,. 80 u. Gu 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 90 7. 90 Q. UC► 5. uO IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE E5 CSOUND AVE] NOME OF THE NORTH/aOU7H STREET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER IrNFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pape-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RAZE CAPALIIY CANALITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENF v (Dcph) c (pcpn) c (Dcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 65 389 378 378 31.3 L-+ RIGHT 29 919 919 919 890 A MAJOR SFREET EF LEFT 32 680 680 680 648 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NNME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH SFREFT. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANNLYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OFHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISFiNG CONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZFD IN [FPS[rTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------- ------ ----- ----------^------------------------------ AVERA8E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAV HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10"000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STRFET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRULV ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRFET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yyl . . . . . . UP-"2-q0 TIME PEPIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WEE[- DAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTIN/i CONDITIONS. INTERSE/ 7ION TYPE AND / ONTPOL _____________________________________________________________________ INTEPSE[TION TYPE: T- INTERSECTION MAJOR STPEET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFI/ VOLUMES _______________________ ____ _____________________________ _____________ EB WB NR SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 0 U 128 -- THRU 42� 357 0 -- RIGHT 0 0 15 -- NUMBER OF LANES _____________________ _____________________________ ___________________ EB WB NB SB ------- ---- -- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- ADJUSTM[NT [ A� TO�q N� Page-.,-' N� - --------------------------- -- ------ ---__________________________ PEP[ENT RIOHT TURN rUPB RADIUS / ft / ACCELERATION LANE GPADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------------------ EASTBOUND o. VV 90 2(-) N WESTBOUND 0. 00 �U �'o N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------------__ ------------ ---------------------______________ % SU TRUCVS % rOMBINATION AND PV' S VE| |ILL[S % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND J 5 �` WESTBOUND 5 5 V NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- -- _CRITICAL GAPS GAPS _______________________ ______ _____ _ _____________________ _____________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1//-? ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 6. 1» 5. 1() '). 00 5. 0U MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 80 5. 80 0. U0 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 90 7. '�U 0. 00 5. 0U IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUlH STPEET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -------------__ ----- ---_ _ _ ------__________________________________ ['q7[ 1\1 ACTUA| [ | OW— | Ih| | K)VH1FNT 91ARED RESERVE PAT[ / ArArIlY UAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( prph ) ' ( pcnh ` ' ( pcphj c / pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET / NB LEFT 144 466 466 466 221 B RIGHT 17 952 y52 952 935 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 7J8 7�!8 708 738 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________ __________ _____ _ _____ _ _ ------------------------------------ NAME _________________________________NAME OF THE [AST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEl, DAY OTHEP INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS. 1985 1-iC►y1: UNSIONHLIZEU INrERSECTIONS Pane—i iE'�II-i�'lE'!F'1E lE"II"k'iF iEIF►E iF aFlF i!IE��'IE�E iF!4'!F!F i(iE'!F�iE�E iI-iF'IE'iEiEiE'lf'�E IE*iE dF�1"lE"lE iE��'IE�F�E'1F 1E'N"if'*iF qi'�E*�*�9E aF� IDENI-IFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . it►uUC►t► NAME OF I'HE EAS 1'/WEST STREET. ... . . . . . . NYS "C RUCK ROUTE 25 CSOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NOME OF 7 HE ANALYS 1'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , N. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 08-0E-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-1 PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 219 U -- THRU 526 345 -- �► RIGHT C► 7 -- 6 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WLR NB SE( ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- 1 ADJUS'TMEN T FACT URS Page—e --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. GG 90 EU N WES FBOUND C►. t►c.► 'fit► 2C► N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- _ SOUTHBOUND 0. (-)() 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS ;G COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 c► WESTBOUND 5 5 G NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 t► CRITICAL CAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table lc_►—E) VALUE ADJUSTMENT C:RI-TIC.AL. GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RISHiS SB 6. 10 S. 10 G. UC► 5. (-)() MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. mit► 5. 30 u. C►C► 5. t►U MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 40 7. 40 C►. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREE'T. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE E5 (SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOU-IH STREE..T. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 06-02-90 ; 12N-1 PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE Pane-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POT'EN— ACTUAL FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RA'fE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT" v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c — v LOS D M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT E 6,33 38:3 > 383 > 381 > B 632 > 623 >A RIGHT 7 807 807 > 807 > 8t►0 > A MAJOR S('REST Eta LEFT 35 8t►3 6(-),3 803 -765 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK RUUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-0E-90 ; 1EN-1 PM SATURDAY OFHcR INFORMATION. . . . EXISFING CONDITIONS 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED IN1"EHSECTIONS Pane-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAUE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10(.)C►()u NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NYS I RUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . KIRKUP LANE NAME OF THE NNHLYS t'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. . N. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . 08-02-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-1 PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION "TYPE AND CONT'HOL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECIION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR S FREET DI RCECTiON: LAST /WES f CONTROL TYPE NOR'T'HBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAF=FIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NH SB LEFT 0 1 THRU 528 353 Q -- RIGHT 0 tF 1 -- NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 -- ADJUS FMEN'F FACTORS Page—r --------------------------------------------------------------------- NERCENI RIUH"I TURN DUKE+ RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. 00 9C) 2C) N WES FE(OUND 9ci 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SUUTHSOUND ----- --- —_— _ VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- ,G SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RVIS VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EAS rBOUND 5 5 t) WESTBOUND 5 5 C) NUR FHBOUND 1 1 C) SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRIFICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table to-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NS 6. 1 t) 6. 10 V. UG 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS Ws 0. 50 5. ;t> U. UU 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NS 7. 40 7. 40 0. UC) 5. 00 ILENFIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . , NYS TRUCK ROUTE E5 ESOUND AVE] NOME OF FHE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . KIKKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 12N-1 PM SATURDAY OFHER INFORMATION. . . . EXiSFINU CONDITIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Paoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MUVEMEN F v (pcph) c (ocph) c (pcph) c Qcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 0 406 405 > 405 i 405 > A > 641 > 640 )A RIGHT 1 641 641 > 641 i 640 > A MAJOR STREET WH LEFT 1 641 641 641 640 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST 'STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUIE E5 [SOUND AVE] NOME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH SFRE6T. . . . KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 12N-1 PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMAFION. . . . EXISTING LONDITIONS 1985 HCM: UNSInNALI7FD INTFPSr/ [IONS rage-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -- -- ------------------------------------ AVERA8E RUNNINu SPFFD, MAJOP S [PE[T. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WESl STPEET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCW ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . . . . [DX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSVY P. E. , P. U. DATE O[- THE ANALYSIS / mm/dd/vvl . . . . . . 08-02-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZ[D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY. OTHER INFOPMATION. . . . FXISTIN/i [ONDI [ IONS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND LONTPOL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ___________________________ __________________________________________ EB WB N8 SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 21 88 THRU 508 334 -- 0 RI8HT o 1U6 - 19 NUMBER OF LANES _________ ______ ____ __________ _____________________________________ EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 -- 2 ADJUS /M[NT FA[ TORS F'ane-� _________________ __ ___ _ _ _ ----- -------- -------------------------- PERCENT ____ ________ ________________________F'EP[ENT RIGHT TURN [URB PADIU9 / ft ` ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _ __ ___ _______ _ _______________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0. 0o y0 ^'U N WESTBOUND yo 20 N NORTHBOUND ---- SOUTHBOUND 0. o0 90 20 N N� VEHICLE COMPOSITION - - ----- '---------------------------- % SU TPU[( S % rOMRINATION AND RV' q VFHT, | [S MOTORCY/ LES ____________ EASTSOUND » WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND --- --_ _-- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS ________________ _________________ _______________________ ___ __________ TABULAR VA| UES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL / Table 1" 2 / VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP _______ __ ____ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR ___________MINOR [/IGHTS SB 6. 1() 6. 10 V. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 8» 5. 80 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 'Jo 7. 90 5. 00 IDENTIFYIN8 INFOPMATION --------------- -------------- - ------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . NYS TRUCh ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAM[ OF THE NOPTH/SOUlH STREET . . . . [OX NELk ROAD DAT[ AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-o2-90 ; 12N-1PM SATURDAY. OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FXISTING LONDITIONS. r.AF'Ar I.T Y AND L._E_VE=L._-Or— '?r:._pv v r._ Page— ---------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------- r'O'I E ra Ar TUAL- F"I__OW- TIAL f UVFMENT SHARED RESERVE FATE J APAF I T V L AF'Al I TY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVE_L'IENT v ( pcph ) I ( prph , r f pc ph , c i pcph ) r = c - v LOS I., III SH IT SH ---- MINOR STI=-.'EET SH LEFT 99 307 .]7'31 37'3 280 F RIGHT 21 943 903 943 921 A MAJOR STREET EP I-Er- T 7.,-',"! -..._ 72 697 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATICSN ---------------- ----------- ------------- ------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/LEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 ESOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE= AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-02-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY. OTHER I NFORMAI ION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS. 1985 HEM: UNSIGNALI7FD INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __-- --- - -- -_- - ' - -__ ' --_ - -- AVERAGE PUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STPFFT. . 45 PEAK HUUR FA[ TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . ~ . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1V00oo NAME OF THE EAST/WFST STPFET . . . . . . . . . NYS TPUCV ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE ] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. . P. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ' mm/dd/yyl . . . . . . 08- o2 -90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY. OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTINH LONDITIONS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND LONTROL _______________ ______________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP 5IGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB W8 NB SB LEFT 0 o 114 - THRU 5oU RIGHT 211 - - NUMBEP OF LANES -------- ------------- ----- ---------------------------^---- ------------ EB WB NB SB --- ---- ------- ------- ------- LANES 21 2 2 -- ADJUqTM[-NT [-ArTOPS Page-..` _ ___ _____ ___________________________ F'FR[FNT RIGHT TURN / URB PADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND «. 0» 5` NORTHBOUND 0. 00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ___ - VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU FR(/LIS % LOMBINATION AND Rum VEHI/'LES % MOTOR[YLLES _____ ______ _____________ -------------- EASTBOUND ____________EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- -- ___ CRITI[AL GAPS - ------------------------------------- TABULAR ___________________________________TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 10 21 VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ MINOP RIGHTS NB 5. 1() 0. o0 5. 0() MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 8() 5. 8V 0. 00 5. 0() MINOR LEFTS NB 7. ,j0 7. 90 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION ____________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRU0 ROUT[ 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-»2-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY. OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FYISTING LONDITIONS. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-Or- SLRVIrF Page-3 _______ ______ ____ _ ____ __ ________ __ _________ __________ _____________ ['OTFN - A/ TUAL FLOW - lJH| UUVFMENT "3)|ARED RESERVE RAT[ / A['ArITY rAPA[ ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v ( pcph ) r ' p.'ph ` r / pcph ` ( prphl c = c - v LOS n M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 129 4238 438 438 310 B RIGHT 24 911 y11 911 887 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 667 667 667 667 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-"2-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY. OTHFR INFORMATION. . . . EXlSTIN/i CONDITIONS. ' CAPACITY ANALYSES FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES 1985 H/`M: UNSJ"NAL I7[D lN7rP9[ / [ TUNS Pagp-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________________ ______________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAV HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y4 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10"0o0 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSPY DATE OF THE ANALYSIS vmm/dd/yv ` . . . . . . "8-03-30 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5- 6 rM WEE�DAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND rONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOiUMFS __________________ __________ _________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 29 THRU 502 436 -- 0 RlCil-IT o 2, -- 16 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB BB LANES ADJUSTMLNT | ALlO|'S F'aoe -2 __ _ ________ _ ___ ___________________________ __ PFP/ [NT PI/ i| |T TUPN rUPB PADIUS ( ft ) ACrELFRATION LANE /iRADE ANGi [ FOR RIGHT [URNS FOR PI8HT TURNS -_- - - ____ - - _ ---- - __________ '________________ FASTBOUND /`. /v` 9/` 2L) N WESTBOUND 0. 00 2/ 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 75 5U N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ____________________ _ ___ _ _ ---------- --------------------------- -- % _________ ___________________________ _% SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' 5 VFHILLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _______ ___ __ _____________ EASTBOUND 5 5 �/ WESTBOUND 5 5 « NORTHBOUND -- ___ --- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS ___________ ---- -------- ----- ----- ------------------------- TABULAR ___ ________ _____ _____ ________________________TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1"-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ----- -------- -------- ----------- ----------- - MINOR PI6HTS SB 6. 10 6. 1�/ 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS FB 5. 30 5. 30 0. 00 5. 0o MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 4V 7. 4U 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRLET. . . . BEPGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEFDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. ^ CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVILE Page-3 --------------' ------- -- - ------- -- ---------- ----------------------- PO [EN— ACTUAL - r-LOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED PESFRVE RATE LAPA IT [APACITY [APACITY [APA[ ITY MOVEMENl v( pcph ) r ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph) c = r — v LOS p M SH P SH _______ _ _ _____ _ ________ ____________ ____________ ---- MINOR __MINOR STREET N� SB LEFT 1 J82 372 372 371 > B 701 682 ` A RIGHT 17 741 741 741 > 724 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT JJ 741 741 741 707 A IDENTI[-YING INFORMATION NAM[ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRU[h ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFOPMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. 1985 H[M: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------- ------- -- ------------0------------------------ AVERA6E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. , . . . . . KIRKUP i.ANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSVY P. E. , P. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yv / . . . . . . 08-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WEEkDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT o 11 6 -- THRU 494 43� RIGHT NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________ ___ _____________________________________ PERK[NT RIGHT TUPN rUFpB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS � - - - - --- - - -- ------ ------- ----------------- EASTBOUND o. o�� 90 20 N WESTBOUND //. 00 90 2o N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- N� VEHICLE COMPOSITION N� ________________________________ _____________________________________ % SU TRU[yS % uOMBINATION AND RV19 VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _______ ____ _ ____________ _____________ EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- CFpITICAL GAP9 TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 6. 10 6. 1V V. (y) 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 30 5. 30 0. U0 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 40 7. 40 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYINu INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRU[r ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . KlRVUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. ' CAPACITY AND LEVEL- OF- SEPVIuL Page-3 ______________________ ___ ___ _ _________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL - FLOW - TIAL MOVFMENT SHARFD PFSERVE PATE rAPA[ ITY /`APACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVFMENT vcpcph ) r ( prph ) '' ( pcph) r / pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _----------- _________ ____________ ____________ ---- MINOR __MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 375 371 > 371 ) 364 > B > 477 463 �A RIGHT 7 668 668 / 668 661 / A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 1J 664 664 664 651 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ N4ME OF THE [AST/WEST 9TPEET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . KIRIUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. 1985 HrM: UNSIGNALIZ[ D INTFRSErlIONS Page-1 ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______________________________ _______________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEA[.'* HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . 9 ' AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. ' . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/py / . . . . . . o8-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND LONTROL ________________________________ _____________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSE/ TION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _______________ ______________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 29 o -- THRU 471 415 -- 0 RIGHT 0 97 -- .28 NUMBER OF LANFS ___________________________ FR WB NB SB LANES 21 ADJUSTMF1\17 FALTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PEP[ENT RIHHT TURN / UPB RADIUS rft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _ ___ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND o. 0» 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 9V 2V N NORTHBOUND ----- --- SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 30 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION N� _____________ _ __________ _ __ ___________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV' S V[-HICLES % MOTORCYCLES --- -------- - ---------- -- ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 � WESTBOUND 5 5 NORTHBOUND --- --- __- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS _______________ ________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL /Table 10-2/ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ MINOR RIGHTS SB 6. 10 6. 1�� 0. 00 5. U0 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 80 5. 8o 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 90 7. 90 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------------_______________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCr ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-"3-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARl HOMES. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SEPVI[E Page-3 ____________ ________ __ _____ 0 __ _________ --------------------------- F'OTFN- ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVFM[NT SHAPED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY LAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ______ _ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET N� 8B LEFT 68 353 353 286 [ RIGHT 32 9u5 905 9V5 873 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 35 656 656 656 621 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE rONDITIONS WITH MA[ARI HOMES. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED lNTFRSELTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________________ ____ ____ _ ------------------------------------------ AVERAGE _______________________________________AVERA8E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STRFET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . ' ~ . . . ' . . . ~ . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WESl qlPEET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yyj . . . . . . U8-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 F'M WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTEPSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STPFET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT o 0 135 -- THPU 443 ]77 RIGHT 0 o 16 -- NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 __ ' ADJUSTMENT FAC [OF'S rage-12 ________________________ ____ ______ --------------------- --------------- PERCENT ____________________ _____________PERCENT RIGHT TURN ' URB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. U0 90 20 N NORTHBOUND V. "0 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- _ N� VEHI[LE COMPOSITION -------- ------------- --------------------------------------- % _______ _____________ ______________________________________ % SU TRUU' S % rOMBINATION AND RV, g VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- ___ CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1»-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP _____ _ ________ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR ___________MINOR RIGHTS NB /,. 10 5. 1�/ V. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 80 5. 80 V. 00 5. V0 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 90 7. 90 ». 00 5. U0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF f•?L=RV I C'E Page ------------------------------ -- -------------------------------------- rOTEN Ai TUAL-. FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVE=MENT v c pcph ) c ( pcph) c ( pcph) c (prph ) c — c — v LOS f� M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 152 442 -4-42 44:= 289 C RIGHT GHT 10 941 941 941 923 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT i 719 71'3 719 719 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --- NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 ESOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE_ AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 iS-9 0 ; 5--E FM WEEKDAY OTF'll:_R INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MAC:AR I HOMES. ' 1985 H[M: UNSIGNALIZED INTFPm[[ [IONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' __________ ______ _ ______ __________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . 10»C»/0 N� NAME OF THE EAST/WFST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCV ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy / . . . . . . 08-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFOPMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL __ _______________ ___ ___ ___________ _____________ _____ ________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIP[rTION: FAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES __________________________ __________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT o 0 120 -- THRU 571 343 o -- RIGHT o 0 22 -- NUMBER OF LANES _____________________ ________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2, 2 -- ' ADJUSTMENT [-A[TORS Page-2 _________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _ ______ ____________________________ PFR[ENT PIH/ |T TURN LUPB PADIUS ' ft / ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOP RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ---- --- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. 0// 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. U0 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ___ ' _ VEHICLE COMPOSITION N� _______ _ ___ _____ ______ __ ____________________________________________ % SU TPULKS % COMBINATION AND PV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES _________ _ _____________ --------------- EASTBOUND ____________EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRITICAL GAPS, _____________________________________________________________________ N� TABULAR VALUFS ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ____ __________ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR ___________MINOR RIGHTS NR 6. 1U 5. 10 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 80 5. 80 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 90 7. 90 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF- qFPVI[E Page-3 ____________________ _____________________ ____________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL ' FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE PATE [AF'AITY rAPACITY [APACITY [APACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c ( pcph) c (pcph) c /pcph/ c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ _____ ___ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET N� NB LEFT 135 388 J88 388 253 C RIGHT 25 874 874 874 849 A MAJOR STREET' WB LEFT �08 6U8 608 608 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __-___--___-_-_______-__ _-_ - -______________________________-_________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . o8-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTEPSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __________________________ _______ ____________________________________ AVERA6E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAV HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . 08-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATlON. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ___ _ ---- LEFT 210 0 -- 2 THRU 557 J64 -- 0 RIGHT 0 7 -- 6 - NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB __---------- _______ ------- LANES 1 1 -- 1 ADJU'--)TMENT PERC E:=NT F=I H IT TURN F URB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND , c�� ��� '--- -••—•--- � —--- j ---- �----------------------- WESTBOUND t , c ii� �,�.� N NORTHBOUND -- - -- ----- __-• SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 >; 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------ --------- -- ------------------ ---------------------- SU TRUC F S % COMBINATION AND RV' r VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES WESTBOUND O NORTHBOUND ---- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 i i TARS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1"-2) VAI__UE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP --- -- ------------ MINOR -----------MINOR R I I-iF ITS SD 6. 1 6. 1U 0. K.) 5, Oci MAJOR LEFTS EB 5, Q-) 5. :.',c� 5. 0() M I NOR LEFTS SB 7. 40 7. 40 ci. 0( 5, c_icj IDENTIFYING I.NFORMATION _---__-_------•--------••------------•--- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . , . NYS TRUC.F' ROUTE 25 ESOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. „ . . BERUEN AVE DATE AND TIME. OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 r 12N—IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. CAPACITY AND LEVEL- Or-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------- ---- ----- ------- --------------------__________________________ POT[N- A[TUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( prph ) r Qcphl ' ( pcph ) c /pcph / c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 2 369 359 ` 359 ' 357 B ) 6o7 > 598 `A RI8HT 7 788 788 788 ` 781 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT J6 795 785 785 749 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRU[F ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE rONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. 1985 HCM: (. NSIi7hlr'jl._.T.7_ED TNTFPSFLTION5 F'ape -a •3f•k••K••!E••M•�:K•)E•9f••?F•a!-•�j..�f..lF 1F:�34••!E•!F•�IE?'E)(••?f•if..#..N..�F..�F..IE..f4..#..�E•aL jE••)F•M••�(••}F!(-�3f•3E#•?E##•k•-1f••!E•3F�!••�f••fl•iE•.�.#�Y•3E�f••!E•.*k••?F)F•!E#.K. IDENTIFYING .T.NF-ORMATION AVERAGE FUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAU HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '3 i AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :L oo ai ( NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . NYS TRUE=k ROUTE 25 E SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . I• IPRUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSE Y P. E-. , P. C. DATE OF THE ANALY91S r mm/dd/yy l . . . . . . 08-"3-9(:) TIME PE_PIOD ANALYZED. . . „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N--1F'M SATURDAY OTHER I NF-OPMAT I ON. . . . FUTURF F OND T T I ONS WITH MArAP I HOMES. I NTE PSEF T T.ON TYF-"L AND rONTPUL --------------- ----------------------------------------- -------------- I NTERSEi'TION TYPE: T INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET D I R EF TION: EAST/WEST C ONTPOL TYPE NOPTI ROI.JNP: STOP S I UN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ED WD IAB SE-1 LEFT c) ci TI-1RU 3 5O 36 C) - RIisHT 19 B _._. NUMBER nF- LANES E-E, WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 -- ADJUSTMENT FALTORS Page—,.! -----------------------__ _ _ __________ _____________________________ PEPrENT RIGHT TURN [URB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ _ _ __ ____ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND o. 00 90 2c)� N WESTBOUND V. //« 90 2U N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- --- -__ — VEHI[LE COMPOSITION _ __________________________________ % SU TRUCVS % [OMBINAFION AND RV' S VEHIrLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 U NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- ___ --- CRITICAL GAPS ________________________ ________________________________________ TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL / Table 10-2/ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR ___________MINOR RIGHTS NB 6. 10 6. 10 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 30 5. J0 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 4» 7. 40 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________ _________ ________________________________________________ NAME OF THE FAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . VIRFUP LANE DATE AND TIMF OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N—IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MA[ARI HOMES. LAPACITY AND LEVFL Or- SFPVI[[ Page-3 ________________________________________________________ _____________ F'OTFN- ACTUAL ' FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) ( pcph ) c (pcph) c ( pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH P SH ------- -------- ---- ----- - ----------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET N� NB LEFT 82 379 379374 ` B ' 498 484 SA RIGHT 9 620 620 62o 611 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 7 616 616 Go9 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . FIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. | 1985 H[M: UNSIGNALIZFD INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . 10000» NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECk ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/vy ) . . . . . . 08-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE LONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND LON7ROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSE[TION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WFST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 23 o -- 92 THRU 535 RIGHT 0 110 -- 21 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 � -- 2 ^S3WOH Id\/3VW HlIM SNOIlIONO3 mDlOj ^ ^ ^ ^NOIlt/W8OANI WHlO Aw8OlvS W6T-N3T t 06-00-80 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^SIS,\lVNV 3Hl JO DWIl ONt/ 31VO OVO8 113N XO] ^ ^ ^ ^133dlS HLOOS/HL8ON 3Hl JO 3WVN [3AV ONOOS] so 3lOO8 A3Odl SAN ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^l338lS lS3M/lSV3 AHI JO 3WVN _____________________________________________________________________ NOIlVW8OJNI 9NIAJIlN3OI 00 ^q 00 ^0 o6 ^Z. 06 ^l 8S SlJ31 8ONIW 00 ^S 00 ^0 08 ^s 0819 83 SlA31 8Oft/W 00 ^q 00 ^o «T ^9 0T ^9 8S SlH9W dONIW ____________ ___________ ________ ______________ 6V9 -lV3IlI83 lN!]WLSDrOV -.1O�VA elqel / lVNIj ^lSIO lH9IS O3lSOfOt/ SDOlt/A dVlD8vl ____ ___________________________________ _ _______ __ _ ____ ___________ _ Sd\/q -|t/3IlId] 0 T T ONOO8HlOOS --- --- --- ONOO8HlaON - 0 s 9 ONOO8lS3M 0 S ONOO8lSV3 _____________ _____________ ___________ S3-OA]8OlOW % S31]IH]A S ^Ad ONV NOIJVNI8WOA % Si]Odl OS % ___________________________________ _________________________________ NOIlISO6WO3 313IH3A 0� = N 0ZI 06 0V ^0 ONOO8HlOOS - --- --- ----- ONOO8HldON N 0:7 06 00 ^o ONOO8lS3M N »oo6 0010 ONOO8lSw ----------- _____ ___- - _____- _ - _- - - - - SNaOl lHSI,d dOJ SNdUl lH9Id AOJ 310NV 3OVJO 3NVI NOIlM31333V W ) SOIOM 8dDi N8/)l lHRld lN]]d3d ---------------------------- _---- ---- _ _ ___---- _ ---- __________________ j-ebe6 SHUllM lNAWlSOfO\/ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF-SERVICE _______________________________________________________________Page-3 POTFN ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v/ pcph ) c ( prph) c ( prph / r (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 104 364 356 356 252 C RIGHT 24 931 931 931 907 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 27 7"2 702 702 674 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ________________ _______ ________ ____________________________ _________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . [OX NE[}. ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. 1985 HCH: UNSI6NALIZED INTFPSE[TIONS Page-1 IDENTTFYIN/i TNFORMA [J(}N ------- - ------ -- - ' -- --' - -- ---- -------------------- ------------- AVERA8E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STPEET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . ^ . ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 1000n0 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCV ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRFET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSPY P. E. , P. r. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yvi . . . . . . 08-03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MA[API HOMES. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ____ ___________________________ ______________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIL VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT o 0 12o -- THPU 5.26 RI6HT ------ NUMBER _NUMBER OF LANES ----------_________________ ________________________________________________ EB W1? NB SB LANES � 2 2 -- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ---------- ------ _ _ _ _ __ --- _ --- ___ ------ ____________________________ PER[ENT RIGHT TURN LURB RADIUS ' ft / ACCELERATION LANE GRAD[ ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ---------------- ------------------ EASTBOUND 0. o0 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 Y0 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. o0 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- VEHICLE --VEHI[L[ COMPOSITION ------------------------------------- % ___________________________________ % SU TRUQrS % rOMBINATION AND PV' S V[HI[LES % MOTO RC:YCL[S ---- -- -- '- -- - -- ----- ---- -------- EASTBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL tTable 10-2/ VA| UE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 6. 10 5. 10 0. U0 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 80 5. 80 0. 00 5. 0o MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 90 7. 90 0. 00 5. UV IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION _____________________________ ________________________________________ NAME OF THE FAST/WEST STRF[T. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME Or THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MA[ARI HOMES. CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- A/ TUAL - FLOW- [7A| MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY /'APALITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( prph ) c ( prph / c /pcoh ) r ( pcph) c = r - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 1J5 411� 413 413 278 C RIGHT 25 837 897 897 873 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT '/ ('4J 64J 643 643 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ________ _------- --- --- _ ___------------------------------- ------- ___ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . NYS TRUCW ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-90 : 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH MACARI HOMES. CAPACITY ANALYSES FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS 1985 HCM: UNSIGNA| IZ[D lNTFPSFrTIONS Page- 1 IDENTIFYING INFU�MA7lON ____________________ _ _ __ _ _ ___________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNINO SPEED, MAJOR STRFET. . 45 PEAi HOUR FA[TOP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . , 1 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10U0��V NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCk ROUTE 29 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY DATF OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/vv ) . . . . . . V8-»7-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZFD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE LONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL. ___________________________ ________________________________ INTEPSE[TION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRE/ TION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE SOUTHROUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------- ------- ----------------------------------- ED _--__________________________-__EB WB NB SB LEFT 29 o -- 1 THRU 525 U RIGHT 16 NUMBER OF LANEq EB WB NB SB LANES ADJUSTM[NT [ ArTUPS Paoe-� _______________ __ ____________ __ ____________________________________ PER[EN [ PI/iHT T\/RN / URB RADIUS ' ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGH [ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND V. 0o 90 20 N WESTBOUND ». o// 20 N NORTHBOUND - --- --- ___ - SOUTHBOUND 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUQS % [OMRIMATION AND PV' q VB1I/ LES % MOTOR[YCLES -- - -- - - - - ---- EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND - - ---- SOUTHBOUND --SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 LRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL / Table 10-2 / VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP --- --- ----- --- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOP RIbHTS SB 6. 10 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 30 5. 30 U. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 4f) 7. 4V 0. U0 5. ()(l IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAS [/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRFFT. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 : 5-6 PM WEEIDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTUPE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. CA[`ACITY AND LEVEL—OF -SERVICE Page-3 ___ __________________________ __________________________________ POTEN— ACTUAL - FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED PESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c / pcph / c ( pcph) c (pcph / c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _______ _______ _________ ____________ ____________ ---- MINOR __MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 393 384 ` 384 / 383 B V 713 / 696 A RIGHT 16 754 754 754 / 738 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 21 75J 752, 753 722 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------- ----------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HC M: UNS I GNAT.._I 7_FD I NTFRsI:=i r 10N S r'aae-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '3 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0000(_) NAME OF THE EAST I W ST STRf:=I=T. . . . . . . . . NYS TPUC V ROUTE 2S E SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . VIRFUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E:-. . F'. F . DATE_ OF THE. ANALYSIS c mm/dd/` i . . . . . . 08—U 7-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.--f-_-, I'M WEEf*DAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSEC T I ON TYPO-=: T- I N TE:r'SEi •TION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: LAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP S I i_;N TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------- ------------- ------------------------------------------ EB Wu NB SB LEFT THRU 5 J. ,.f4 a RIGHT 9 ti G _ NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------ --------------------------------------------- D WB NB SD LANES ADJUSTMENT FA[ TORq Page-� _________ _________ _____ _ __ __ ________________________________________ PEP[ENT RIGHT TUPN LURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS --- ________________ ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. V0 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. //U 0) 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- _ VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------------------- -------------------------------------- % SU TPU[| S % / OURINATION AND PV' S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES _____ ________ _____ _____________ EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 3 0 NORTHBOUND 1 1 V SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- CRITICAL GAPS ________________________ _ ____________________________________________ TABULAk VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1//-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL dAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ MINOR RIGH [S NB 6. 10 0. U0 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 30 5. 30 (). 0() 5. 0V MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 4o 7. 4() 5. 0o IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . FIRiUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-/`7-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE / ONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. CAPACITY AND LEVFL-OF-SERVIrE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTFN- ACTUAL - FLOW- 7lAL MOVFMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY rArArITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vcpcph / r fpcph ) ' ( pcph) c ' pcph / c = c - v LOS p M SH P SH __......... _...... __ _ ____ ____________ ____________ ---- MINOR __MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 355 J55 ' 349 B 1 40/ 447 /A RI8HT 7 651 693 653 / 647 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 13 64Y 649 649 636 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . fIRkUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 ; 5-6 PM WEB/DAY ' OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED IMTFREErTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING IHFORMA [ION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREFT. . 45 PEAK HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . ^ . ~ . . . . . ^ ,�j AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10"000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . [OX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHAPSKY P. [. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ' mm/dd/vy / . . . . . . o8-"r-9U TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 PM WE0DAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND LONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STRELT DIP[[TION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFI[ VOiUMES _______ ___ __ __ -- -------- --------------------------------- E El _ ________ ________________________________EB W8 NR SB LEFT 32 o -- 60 THRU 481 4J1 -- 0 RIGHT 0 97 -- 31 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB --- - --- --- ---- ------- --- ---- LANES 2 � ^Sl33fO86 7171V HUM SNOIlIONO] A8OlDj ^ ^ ^ ^NOIlVWdOJNI 83HlO AVOA33M W6 9-S i 06-10-80 ^ ^ ^ ^ ~SISAIVNV 3Hl JO 3WIl CNV 3lVO OVOd A3aN XO3 ^ ^ ^ ^l33dlS HlOOS/HlVION 3Hl JO 3WVN [3AV ONOOS] w 3lOOd A]O8l GAN ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^l338lS 133M/lSV3 DHl JO 3WVN ---------- -------------------------------------------------------____ NOIlVW;JOJ-NI 9NIA--4I1NEIOI 00 ^L� 00 ^0 06V UF` ^L as SlA31 8ONIW 00111 00 ^0 08 ^L. 8:1 SlJ3-1 �OrVW 00M, 0(- ^0 UT8S SlHBId JONIW ------------ ----------- -------- dvu lVDIIIIIA lV3IlIII] lN3WlSOpOv E101m -IvNI-J ^lSIO lH9IS O3lSOrOV SiOlVA dviO8w. -------------------------------------- _ _ ----- ------ --- --- ---- ________ 0 T T ONOO8HlOOS --- --- --- ONOO8HlMN 0 S 9 ONOO81S3M 0 9 ONOO8lS\/3 _____________ _____________ ___________ S313A35OlOW % S3713I1HIM 6 ^Ad ONV NOIlVNI8WO] % 943O6l OS % _______________________________________________ _____________________ NOIlISO6WO] 3713IHEIA N 0� 06 0010 ONOO8HlOOS - --- --- ----- ONO08Hl8ON N 0� 0u �N ^o ONOO8lSm N W oC (0 ^'/ ONOO81S\/3 ----------------- ______- -_-_____- SN8Ol 1H9Id Mal SN8O1 lHSId 8OJ 31UNV 3OVd5 EINVA NOIlMA11133V ( 44 ) SOIUvo 8dOl NdDl 1H9I0 LN3 /dJJ _________________________________ __ 7-eoe6 S�Ol ]V | JN]NlSO�Ot/ CAPACITY AND LEVEL-DF-qLRVI[[ Page-3 _________________________ _______ _____________________________________ POTFN- ALTUAL , FLOW— TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE RATE [APA[ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcoh) c ( pcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH _______ _ _______ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 68 951 339 339 271 C RIGHT 35 896 896 896 861 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT �8 641 641 641 603 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---__------------------ ---- _ -------------__ ------____________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08—o7-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HLM: UNSIGNALIZFD TM[FPrF / [IONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING TNFORMATION -_-- ' - - - ' --... ..... ..................__-_ _ - - AVERAGE RUNNING 9P[[D, MAJOR S[PrFT. . 45 - PEAK HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10w00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEl NAME OF lHE NORTH/SOUTH STRFET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYS[. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. . P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/% vi . . . . . . o8 "7-90 TIME PERIOD ANALY7[D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 F'M WEE| DAY OTHER INFOPMATION. . . . rUTUR[ LOND[TIONS WITH ALL PPOJELT3. INTERSECTION TYPE AND rONTPOi ____________ ____ _ _______________ __________________________ INTERSE[TION TYPE: T-INTERSEr | ION MAJOR STREET DIPE[TION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIr VOLUMFS _ __ __ ____________ _ ______ ___________________________________ EB WE, NB SB LEFT o 14o -- THPU 450 388 (` - - RIGHT 0 V 16 NUMBER (IF OF LANES ' ----------------- -------------------------------------------- ED ________________ __________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES 2 -- ADJUSTMENT FA[ TOP5 P -Z __________ __________ _ ___ ____ _ ___ ___________________________ aoe P[PL[NT RlGH[ TURN / URB PADIUS ' ft / A[LELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE rOR RIGH [ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - ---- ------- _________________ EASTBOUND V. /») 90 20 N WESTBOUND `«� �U N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- -__ - VEHICLE COMPOSITION _______________________ ____ _ _ ___ ___ ______________ ____________________ % SU TPUL/ S % LOHpINA[ION AND PV' R VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES -__ -- - - --_- -_-__- -_ --__________- EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 0 SOUTI-|BOUND --- --_ --- CRITICAL GAPS _______ _ ____ ___ _ __ ------------ ------------------ -------- TABULAR ___________ __________________ _______TABULAP VAiUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ' Table 10-11 VALUE ADJUSTMENT rPITI[AL HAP MINOR RIGHTS NB �. 1�/ 5. 1U 0. 00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 8() 5. 80 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 9') 7. 9V o. U« 5. 00 ' [DENTIFYINu INFORMATION --- --------- --------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STPF [T. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 : 5-6 PM WEEFDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE GONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. [APA/ ITY AND LEVEL-OF-PFPVI[[ Page-3 ___ ------ ---------------------------------- A C T'I.j A I _____ _________________________________A/'TUA{ - FLOW- TIAL |1OVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY [APACITY [APArITY MOVEMENT v( ocoh ) ' ( ocph ) ' ( ocph ) c tpcph) c = r - v LOS o M SH R SH ------- - ------ -- ------ ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LE�T 431 431 .27J C RIGI-IT 18 9J8 'j,318 938 919 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 711 7 J 713 712 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ___________ ___________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH qTPEET. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE rONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZ[D lNT[PSF/ [IONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _______ ____________________________ AVERAGE RUNNINd SPEED' MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAP HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10i)U00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST 9TREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . 08-"7-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _________________________ ____________________________________________ INTERSE[TION TYPE: T-INTEPSE[TION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFI[ VOLUM[S EB WB NB SB LEFT J0 THRU 580 376 -- 0 RI8HT 0 7 -- 6 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-Z .............................. PERCENT RIGHT TURN CUPB PADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT [URNS FOR RIGHT TURNS - - -- - - - - - - - -----^-- ------ ----------------- EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 9V NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _________________________ ___________________________________________ % SU TRU[VS % COMBINATION AND PV' 3 VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- --- --- ----- ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- --- SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS ________________ _________ ____________________________________________ TABULAP VALU[-S ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table 1n-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ------------- MINOR ___________MINOP RIGHTS SB 6. 10 6. 10 0. 0U 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. J0 5. Jo o. 0» 5. »0 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 4() 7. 40 0. 00 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______________________ _______________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SEPVIiF Page-3 ___________________ ___ ______________ ___________________________ POTEN— (1- [TUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY [APArITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v/ pcph ) r ( prph ) '' / pcph ) ' cpcph) c = c — v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 2 353 ?49 ' 343 341 ` B 590 � 581 A RIGHT 7 777 777 ` 777 . 770 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 774 774 774 738 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____________________ _______ _________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . BERGEN AVE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08—o7-90 ; 12N—IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE rONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTFRSE/ TIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------AVERAGE RUNNING RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEA|' HOUR FA[TOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRU[A ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . rIRKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST' ' . . ' . . . ' ' . . . . . . ' . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANAiYSIS ( mm/dd/vy , . . . . . . 08-"7-9U TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _______ _____________ __ _____ __________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 6 5 THF-'U 570 57» J7y o -- RIGHT Q 8 -- NUMBER OF LANES ____________ _____________ __ __________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES ADJUS'TME'NT FA1. TOP1.-'3 Page—,-' PERCENT RIGHT TURN U URB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TI. RNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 ._,�) i-() _______�_._----___--- WESTBOUND 0, 00 jc_) O iu NORTHBOUND ". 00 ,ni 0 N SOUTHBOUND VEHICLE COMPOSITION -------------------------------------------- SU TRU)_I S % COMBINATION AND RV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTPOUND WESTBOUND 5 5 C) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND --- ---- ___ CR I T I C AI_ GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table to-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ----- ------------ MIhdOF,-' RIGHTS NB 6. 10 c- 10 =), cJc.) 5. U0 i MAJOR LEFTS MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 4(-) 7. c1.() o. i u 5. 00 IDENTIFYING I NF()1r'1°IAT I OP.1 -- NAME OF THE L=AST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 f_SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STf"'L=ET. . . . L IRHUP 1 ANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 r 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITFC ALL P'ROJEC'TS. CAPACITY AND LEVEL .-or---grp T.i_.E Page —33 ------------- ---------------------- ------ ---------------------------- POTEN— Ai T UAI. FLOW— 'TIAL_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE i_'APAC I TY CAPACITY C ArAC I TY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v c pcPh 7 c c pcph ? c_ c p ph > r c pcph ) c -- c v LOS p PI SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 ?67 264 3E4 V 359 L-.i -4-82 11•6 8 :A RI Gl-IT a E,c)5 605 Gc i5 59E, A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 7 6"2 6".2, C-,(12 595 A IDENTIFYINim INFORMATION _ NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET'. . . . . . NYS TRUC.F ROUTE- ' 5 ESOUND— -- — AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . r IRPUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 7—'fit i i 12N—IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE i_OND I T I ON S WITH ALL PROJECTS. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERS[cTIONS Page-1 IDFNTIFYlNG INFORMATION ------------------------ ------------- AVERAGE _______________________ ____________AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ 9 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . LOX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P. E. , P. C . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS cmm/dd/yy / . . . . . . 08 '07-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12N- IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ___________________ __________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STPEET DIPECTJON: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMFS ------------------------- --------------------______________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 26 o -- 92 THRU 550 1-11613 — 0 RIGHT 0 110 - - 22 NUMBER OF LANES ___ _ -- ---------- --------------------------------------- ED WB NB SB ------- ------- -' -- --- ------- LANES 2 2 -- 2 ADJUSTMENl FAi_TOF/S Page-.,-' _ __ _____________________________________ P[RrENT RIdU|l TURN / | {PB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE UPADE ANbLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0. 00 10 2o N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ________________ _ _ _ ------ -------------------------------------------- % ____ ___________________________________________% SU TPU[IS % COMBINATION AND PV' S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___ ________ _____________ _____________ FAS7BOUND 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 .� NORTHBOUND --- --- ___ SOUTHBOUND 1 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS _________ _______________________ ____________________________________ TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL / Table 10-2` VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ___________ MINOR RIGHTS SB 6. 10 6. 10 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 8o 5. 80 0. 00 5. o0 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 90 7. �0 0. 0() 5. U0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-07-90 ; 12N-IPM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. CAPACITY AND LFVFL-OF TrPVIL[- Page-3 FLOW— l IAi M('IVEMFNT SHARED P[SU9VE RATE LAPArITY / APArITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVFMFNT v( pcph ) ' ( Pcph ) ' ( pcph ) c / pcph / c = c — v LOS p M 91.4 R SH _______ ________ _ ________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 104 351 041 041 237 [ RIGHT 25 925 925 925 901 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 31 G31 601 691 660 A IDENTIFYING INFORMA [ION __ ------- - ------- -- -- ------- ---------------- -------------- NAME ____________NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET, . . . . . NYS TRUCf ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . [OX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . U8-07-90 ; 12N-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. S3NV-1 _______ _______ 8S 8N 8M 8.3 _____________________________ ________________________________________ SANVI jO 8s8WON 0 0 1H9I8 8C9 OdHl -- C3T 0 0 lJ3-1 as 8N 8M 83 ____________________________ _____ ____ ____ _____ _ _________ ____________ S3WDlOA JIjjvdl NUIS JO1S :ONOO8HJMON WAl lO8lNO3 1SIM/lbVA :NOI1338IO 13MlS aO1`VW N011 '/1Sd3lNI l QJAl N0I133SWlNI - - ----------------- ----------------------- ------------- IMINDD UNV ONV J'JAl NOIlJJS531NI ^Sl33fO86 WV HIM SNOIJIONOl wOlOj ^ ^ ^ ^NOIJVW8OJNI WH1O AvO8OlvS W`]T-N"T ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^O9Z&IVNV OOId96 3WIl 06-Z/+ 8o ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ' ^»/pP/mm ) SISAlVNV 3HJ JO 31\/O ^ ] ^J ' U ^'l AAS8\/HS ^1, O8vMO3 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^lSAIVNV 3Hl JO 3WVN OVO8 31OOIW ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^l33dlS HlOOw/Hl8ON -BHl JO 3WVN [3AV ONOOS] sz 3lOO'j wO8l SAN ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^l33HlS LS3M/lSVA 3Hl JO BWVN 0��000T ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ` ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^NOIlviO6O6 \/3N\/ F ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' sOlJvi dOOH NV3J OV ^ ^lMMS 4OfVW '033JS 9NINNO8 39V83At/ NUIlVW�O�UI 9NI���IJN�OI l-�oeJ SNUIJ ' JbdJlNI d ]lIlVNH[6ND :W]H O86T ADJUSTMENT [ AC |U �) Paqe-� ______ ________________________ PFPrENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS cft / ACCELERATION LANE 6FADE ANGiF FOP RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ___-_- - - - ---------------- _________________ EASTBOUND ��. 0o '*` �V N WESTBOUND 0. 0() X) N NORTHBOUND /bUo 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- --- ___ - VEHICLE COMPOSITION __ _____ _ ____ _____ _ _ ____________________________________ __ % SU TPU[[ S % COMBINATION AND RV' S \/[|{ICLF9 % MOTORrYCLE9 -------- -- -- - --- ----- - ------------- EASTROUND 5 5 WESTBOUND 5 5 �� NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND --- —_- --- CRITICAL HAF'9 ______ __________________ _____________ TARUiAP VALUFS ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL / Table 10-2/ VALUE ADJUSTMENT [RITI[AL GAP --- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOP RIGHTS NB 6. 1V 5. 1U 0. oU 5. V() MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 80 5. 8() 0. 5. 0V MINOR LEFTS NB 7. "0 7. �U U. o0 5. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------- _______ ------- ---- -------------------___________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREFT. . . . . . NYS TRUC| ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREFT. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08—"7-90 ; 12N—IPM SATURDAY OTHEP INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS. ' rAPA[ ITY AND LEVEL-OF K[-RVI/ F Pane-3 -----__ -------------__ _ ____ _ ------____ ___-------------------------- F'OrEN- ArTUAL FiOW- [IAL MOVEMENT 9/4ARFD 1;:E9ERVE PATE CAF ALITY / AFAcITY UAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vcproh / r ( oroh ) ' ( ocph) r (pcph ) c = r - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STPEET NB LEFT 401 263 [ RIGHT 25 891 891 8q1 066 A MAJOR STRFFT WB LEFT 0 692 632 602 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______________ ___________ ------- ------ ------------------------------- NAME ______ ______ ______________________________NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPE[T. . . . MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIMr- OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-"7-9" ; 12N-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION. . . . FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH ALL PROJECTS.