The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1505Lmga! NoT~..,e Page -4- Sect]on: I301 'B, for permission TO expand exis±ing non- conforming business use ia excess of 50% of present capacity by erecting new build]pg. Location of property: south side of Main Road, SouthoId, New York, bounded north by d. Nierodz]k, east by d. Nierodzi.k, south by Main Road, west Dy J. Nierodzi.k. 9:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon appIication of PeTer T. Ney[and, I]5' Broadway, 7ockv. ilte' Centre, New Yo. rm, for a variance in accordance with the Z0nipg Ordinance, ArTicle iii, Section 30[, for permission to construct private one family' dweIl'i'pg with insufficient lot area, frontage,, sideyards, rear yard, etc. Location of property: east side of Cedar Lane [private road),' Subdiv.ision Map of Gardiners Bay Estates, Section ti:, bounded north by LOT #.~]26 of Gardiners. Bay Sub., Sec. II,: and Spripg Pond, .east by Spripg Pond, south by Lot. #..[27.,of Gardiners Bay Sub., Sec. ti:, and 'Spri.ng Pond, ~est by Cedar Lane. ;i 9:30. P.M. (E'.S.T.) upon applicat]on of Bayview Development' Corporation,. Bayview Road, Southold, New Yo. rk:, for a special exception in accordance with .the Zoning Ordinance, Article' V, Section 500., Subsection B .- 3, for permission TO construct mult'Ip:le' residence apartments (permanent occupancy)..- Location of property: : south side of Bayv.iew Road, South01d, New Yqrk, bounded north by'-Bayv.iew Road, east by. James Bitses, south by Corey Creek, west'by A. & E. Koke. ' Any person deslripg To, be heard on the. above applic-atlons snouI~ ~ppear at .the. time an~' pla'ce specified... DATE~: FEBRUARY I?,~ 197.g,', BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD :TOWN BOARD OF.APPEALS' TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK ,~ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Receipt $ 3802 TO TZq]~ ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 00 Rec. $15.100check APPLICATION NO. 1505 DATE ~.~,~,.,..~Q.¢~Q.~ 2 (We)B.s, zo~e~¢¢ .................................................................................. Development Coro,, , .. of ~...~&LY.;L~:,,:~...¢.~.O..&~.,.,' ~- ' ~, o ........................................................... Name Street and Number ................ .¢..o..-g,~.~.o.% .E. ................................................................ .~.¢.x..~.o.~..~ ................................................................... l~Iunicipality ~ State hereby apply to THE ZOITLNG BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with ~he ...... ZONI~G ORDI E ARTICLE ',, SECTION SUBSECTION '~ ,. : B - 3 TbYE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS REQUESTED BECAUSE ~n~ a c=usu ..... g 6 mnits pr. bldg. ~__s~ead of L~ gives us a more e£fi,:;ient i&ud usage s~ad la~-out~ ~ith more acreage for recreational use. In ad~tion the new const~o, ctions~ based on a clv_stering of 6~ relate more to the ~.~xist~ng motel-bldg. A clustering o£ 6 urn. its per bldg. ~.,~11 me&~_~ that we only anticipate to construct 6 b!dgs, or a total of 36 new apar+~,.ents~ compsm~ed to a clustering of 4 gm. ts per bldg.~ in wkich case we wo~d constru, ct 9 new bld~s. - so tb3_s is a matter of arc~tectural and ecological consideration. ) ss ~?...-r..~~~ .... : .................... COUNTY OF Suffolk) ' t~ ELIZABETH ANN NEVILLE NOTARY PUBLIC, Sfste of New ¥0¢~ No, 52~812585Q, Suff,o~k ~?~ Term EXpite~ M~tch 30, ~ FORM ZB2 Southold, I~o ~. 11971 Thio Lottep is to lnfo~u yin3 that tho aoeees to tho Hol Zone should be applied foF aepa~atel~ as a vao-~tnoe o~ p~opo~ of Ba~vlow Dovelopmont Co~pol, ation. Tours voz7 Chal~uan flo~thold Town Bo~d o~' Appeals VARIA~CE I. Permission to construct buildings containing 6 rather than ~ living ur~ts, 1) Proliferation of number of buildings to 8 from 5 resulting in a) ~agmentation of open recreational space; b) Inefficient handling of sewerage and water systems c) Redundant access roads and parkin~ facilities d) Bloackage of natural scenic views 2) Substantial economic limitations inherent in smaller buildiugs a) Multiplication of heating plants and other utility systems; b) Additional maintenance expenses; c) Reduction in buyer appeal requiring price reduction. YARI~NCE II~ Up-zoning of ~6~O00 sq. feet of tract from A Residential to M-1 to conform with remainder of parcel~ l) Road frontage cannot be developed as a residential lot due to access road requirements of condcm~a~ium project. 2) Developer agrees to refrain from erecting any bui~8~m/ witb~ l~O feet of Bayview Road~ 3) Land to be used as a part of the septic and water resource and wf]] not influence the number of new buildings to be built (5 buildings providing 30 two-bedroom units). All that w~]] be effected is the renovation of the existing motel building. LAUr~HING WATER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN., c~OUTHOLD, N. Y. 11c~'71 March 16, 1972 To the Zoning Board of Appeals To~m of Southold: The Board is respectfully urged to,deny the soeclal exception to the Zoning Ordinance requested by Bayview Development Corporation on the following grounds: The very spirit abd purpose of the Zoning Ordinance wo~ld be violated if the exception were granted. Indeed, the usefulness of the existence of the Ordinance itself comes into question if exceptions of this ~ind are to be granted. ~he proposed buildings and the use to be ~ade of them, if constr~cted, wo~ld have a detrimental effect ~pon the ecology amd environment of this area· The people of Southold, speciflcslly those in the area of Corey Creek, have chosen fthis as a place to live heca~se of the quiet beauty of the surrounding land and water. The interests and welfare of these people mi]st be placed above the pecuniary interests of the Bayview Develop- merit Corporation. qbe granting of t?~e recuested exception would establish a most undesirable precedent. Does the Boar8 want ou~, beautif~l Totem of Southold to t~rn into anot~er Forest Hills, New York? The answer !T:I]st be "NO". Respectfully submitted, Herbert J. curry n Cowan Directors, Laughing Water Property Ov~ers Assoelatlon, Irc. ~embershlp: 55 families The Zoning Board of Appeals 2 March 16, 1972 With perhaps one-fourth to one-third of the~ acres available being filled land and another sizeable fraction zoned R (unavailable for multiple dwelling), the density re- quested is unreasonable. Necessary roads or drives, plus required bulk parking areas as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, further reduce the acreagQ. Mooring facilities for boats and houseboats will produce more pollution and a possible health hazard. The League of Women Voters strongly recommends a~ainst the granting of this application~k ~ ~ ~' ~K e) President, LWV of Riverhead ccs The Planning Board, Town of Southold The Southold Town Board Mr. Herbert Davids THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS BOX 1103 Southold, N.Y. 11971 March 26, 1972 To~ The Zoning Board of Appeals Town of $outhold Re~ Hearing March 16, 1972 Bayview Development Corporation We should like to comment on the application of the Bayview Development Corporation being held tonight. There is a need for some multiple dwellings in the Town of Southold, particularly for younger people and retired people, in a moderate price range. The siting of such developments is of prime concern, and must take into consideration the following factorss 1. The water supply must be proven to be sufficient. Wells needed to provide such water must b~e located as to entirely prevent even the possibility of salt water intrusion. The septic tank and cesspool system, in the absence of proper sewers, must be so located as to reduce to zero the possibility of leaching into either the fresh water supply or a creek or other salt water body. 4. The possible effect on our school population must be considered. Se Attention must be given both to the traffic patterns engendered by multiple housing units and to the proximity of public transportation and shopping facilities. The property under consideration seems to us to be most unsuitable for the projected ~6~or so apartment units. The pro- posed complex is incongruous with the site itself as well as with its surroundings. The fresh water supply in any low-lying waterfront property is precarious at best. Any area, such as this, where dredging and filling have been done, is more than normally vulnerable. The natural slope of the property from the road to Corey Creek increases the possibility of seepage from the tanks into both the fresh water supply and the creek's waters. 'C ,.