Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-9300 Michael J.Domino,President so yo Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams '0 Fax(631) 765-6641 01y0,nUpMi BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 1551C Date: January 8,2019 THIS CERTIFIES that the removal and replacement of 40 linear feet of existing jetty with new vinyl commencing one foot lower at the bulkhead than the existing jetty and continuing seaward at a downward slope not to be level and at no point greater than 18"above rg ade; At 8145 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-118-4-9 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated June 1,2018 pursuant to which Trustees Wetland Permit#9300 Dated August 15,2018,was issued and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being,issued is for the removal and replacement of 40 linear feet of existing jetty with new vinyl commencing one foot lower at the bulkhead than the existing jetty and continuing seaward at a downward slope not to be level and at no point greater than 18"aboverg ade. The certificate is issued to John&Elvira Aloia owners of the aforesaid property. a eb.�eyr� Authorized Signature Michael J.Domino,President �� SUUryo Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold, New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G � O Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg WilliamsycoUNT`l, O Fax(631) 765-6641 � N� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: &I? y Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction / '/ constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: G(n'li ?a q(aw OWA a� fio Am 51-de a.1 g'�lw 54(, fUr�c�al �i aDP�(s owl (o< all Po�fi� u�✓�Iv�t, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: l I I t DiSalvo, Diane From: DiSalvo, Diane Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 2:44 PM To: Bredemeyer,John; Krupski, Nick Subject: FW:Aloia Jetty Replacement Please see below e mail. Diane From: David Kilbride [mailto:dwkilbrideC)gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 2:42 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Vincent and Carol; Paul Konowitz; David Bergen; Stanley Keating Subject: Aloia Jetty Replacement Diane- I understand that Mr. Domino is away on vacation. Would you please forward this e-mail to John Bredemeyer and Nick Krupski in his absence? This is time sensitive. John and Nick- The day following the Hearing on the Aloia Groin/Jetty replacement in August, Mr. Domino phoned both myself and Neighbor Vincent Manago to follow up. Mr. Domino referenced the Trustees' stipulation in your approval that the replacement groin will start at a level at the Bulkhead end which is 12 inches below the height of the present Groin. Mr. Domino stated to me that obviously there would be no way to determine that the replacement was built at that stipulated height unless someone would mark the current height. Mr. Manago did so alongside the current jetty on Mr. Manago's piling on his side of the property line. Earlier today Mr. Manago forwarded to the Trustees' Office his photos of the painted marks he placed there in August. UPDATE: I just met with and had a very friendly conversation with Dan Higgins the contractor for the new jetty. The started work today. MR. HIGGINS IS TOTALLY UNAWARE OF THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE NEW GROIN BE BUILT AT A HEIGHT WITH A BULKHEAD END STARTING POINT 12" LOWER THAN THE CURRENT STRUCTURE. According to Mr. Higgins, whatever working documents he's using do not reference that requirement at all. He said he "would check." At this juncture, is it appropriate for someone from the Trustees' Office to contact either the homeowner or Mr. Higgins to provide clarification? Mr. Higgins believes this is a 3-4 day project, total. It is urgent that the Trustees' requirements be reiterated before another non-conforming groin is constructed. Favorably noted, Mr. Higgins did confirm that the replacement groin is to be 40' in length. Thank you for your continuing engagement on this project. David Kilbride P. O. Box 1305 9045 Nassau Point Road i Cutchogue, New York. 11935 203-228-o861 (Mobile) -preferred 631-734-2354 (home) dwkilbride P gmail.com 2 DiSalvo, Diane From: Carol And Vincent Manago <cvmanago@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 1:35 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Nass Pt- Neighbor Kilbride Dave and Kathy; Nass Pt- Neighbor. Bergen Dave; Nass Pt Neighbor Keating Stanley; Nass Pt Neighbor Drs Paul & Laurie Konowitz; Nass Pt Neighbor Bob And Diane diannebobc@aol.com Subject: Aloia jetty- new construction starting today Attachments: imagel jpeg;ATT00001.txt; image2 jpeg; imageljpeg;ATT00002.txt; image3 jpeg Diane please inform all members of the Board of Trustees that work on the new jetty commenced today. At Mr. Domino's request attached are photos of the present jetty with the following markings on my piling: black paint shows height of present jetty,white paint shows one foot lower which is the new height of proposed jetty as permitted by the Trustees. Mr. Domino asked that I send him photos so that a Board member(probably Mr. Krupski) could visit the site and verify the measurements with my markings on the piling. Please confirm. Thank you,Vincent Manago 1 .yS y S � � � .'S t�1 � P..'• � � �:•�.� � ���T} �. �i � i � �I I�� (�!� '` � t � I I � � t •a } r t _ Or \ �y • 1 ��•• at :� 'iii � .�`"^ r .. w° a a -1 `� I } y A .p . � Y A a� XPi ty : h � i a L Aw 96 a I . Y 4i I a F n c, {j Iy.�t .,� ■ F f �� .. • sem! ...t� i•t � �y1 v wr { IF ■ r .RF 1 - l Michael J. Domino, President ti�o�o oo� Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer, III, Vice-President �q� yam', 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith y x, P.O. Box 1179 A Nicholas Krupski y , Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williams 'hol , I; Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTIVITIES CHECKED OFF BELOW INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction % constructed When project complete, call for compliance inspection; a" r 'l SY•� __ i -. - �� Vr .�' .'•S•v "i, - err � :;?Ci i'S .,. ,, .C��ii ii�s ,. ,yeti r'"'� - 1 ��;.;: "� y'1°yr,�:•-+ F`,`'�1 '�;ni.�' .;:•ti'i rrr��'•- '` °°° ✓i�:;. - ,_�� ,?'-. �'' ".:' �I'-� L.»'m' I'r��"1 ��.:• ^. ��_ J• ' • � 'm'.t,4.g2?ktik�4�C!YY2fi"rs4�m,�'A�'rSs'�L4Stf'4R'_.'�!'1.3'NSFRr..�•�,rc4.?nm�,?rrrX/6��,s1R�R�x�"�9SxS�u8Y5Z2�.AR.R�iT@:71.1E'P.AY1N?9TSR'FaI,NrSgP'ts':ttRAST'."M-�r .2�YU'lrx'?7rX4'r-A«x�"'•'S.^,,:RC�xmf,,,L�mR+":aCa4A����. �. - .,✓,l ,��'_. 1111•. BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES - s SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK a PERMIT NO. 9300 DATE: AUGUST 15, 2018 a. ,� 1 'y r' I• ;b ISSUED TO: JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA J PROPERTY ADDRESS: 8145 NASSAU POINT ROAD. CUTCHOGUE r SCTM# 1000-118-4-9a AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on August 15, 2018, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by John&Elvira Aloia and subject to the Terms W 1' and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the " following: Wetland Permit to remove and replace 40 linear feet of existing jetty with new vinyl, f commencing one foot lower at the bulkhead than the existing jetty and continuing seaward at a N 41a y„ downward slope not to be level,and at no point greater than 18" above grade; and as depicted on the revised site plan prepared by Jeffrey Patanjo dated August 27,2018,and stamped approved on September 5,2018. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this. �•_ y ?f' °.: 4,+ 01 ~ �J\`..a�„�•:�.5»,kzssiassW.anr•i...rvXuaov,�taz:,,-,sous n-uuuc;.�i.:a�i�wxiys�fc,;am:aua�am'u1�cw.w�a�.;,.asra`ri,9��.inYeY.,tanl�a;t�xsrataft%�an�5zsasysnx�Aay.;.zmfaxanirr a�ino�n +abx�7 aa,�r,Ts,Z�u,,.� ��• — r y+� .�¢.--�'�. � f r„ `�:%. �'s""••'5;:,-. �.\civ� ,_i1r'". 'L.'✓��r M'`.i m•Ti� ,.if •4. „€ ,'yl••� �.":.,,,w•' _ .`fV!/ ''�,$J�'� � ''� �'_.rtz�'i� �a�� �- -v,; n. �.�i� �'�.�'` _..,�� �°i�•r.R„�{„S�. '�.,n� ��"'�err..'� •�i -;'1��� _ ,,, ,, \`�-��..:_•�te'+�-P 'erg`" . ;�"a"'""�""mex' �`'—.�......_°i� `}-�'""' 1•��- �y=.3 - -:: rl �!%' ��' .s• ani'" `k• ' ,�a'='' u ••.•.1 :, - '.•,, �,ti;•:. ,s%s.'r 1•t :�"=:f;,u44�,� �� vY TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee John &Elvira Aloia residing at 8145 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York, as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if,in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 10. No right to trespass or interfere with riparian rights. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. Michael J.Domino,President �rjf S0(/jTown Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President l0 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith CA Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski �p Telephone (631) 765-1892 Greg Williams �ly`,om Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September-5, 2018 Jeffrey Patanjo P.O. Box 582 Bohemia, NY 11716 RE: JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA 8145 NASSAU POINT ROAD, CUTCHOGUE SCTM# 1000-118-4-9 Dear Mr. Patanjo: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its Regular meeting held on Wednesday, August 15, 2018 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated June 1, 2018, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 4.1 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: amending size and height of jetty; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 15, 2018, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, 2 ,1 WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA to remove and replace 40 linear feet of existing jetty with new vinyl, commencing one foot lower at the bulkhead than the existing jetty and continuing seaward at a downward slope not to be level, and at no point greater than 18" above grade; and as depicted on the revised site plan prepared by Jeffrey Patanjo dated August 27, 2018, and stamped approved on September 5, 2018. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, Michael J. DomU President, Board of Trustees MJD/dd PROPERTY OWNER: PREPARED BY: a- JOHN F. ALOIA JEFFREY PATANJO ELVIRA T. ALOIA P.O. BOX 582 tS 1 PROPOSED FIR TIMBER TOP CAP 39 NASSAU BLVD. BOHEMIA, NY 11716 GARDEN CITY, NY 11530 631-484-9332rt ;� " �, PROPOSED 6•x6' CCA WALE BOTH SIDES JJPATANJO@GMAIL.COM !p '=- "° f�rv, f '� ,1 ^E s it I t �; APPROXIMATE M.H.W. EL 2.5f NOTES: at, _` PROPOSED 8° DIA. X 14• LONG 1. ELEVATIONS REFER TO N.G.V.D. 1988 DATUM ' CCA PILES ALTERNATING AT 6' •fr 1'�`r-' O.C. BOTH SIDES OF JETTY w 2. LOT AREA: 38,810.00 S.F. / 0.891 ACRES i °0I- � 8145 Na-ssau Point Road 3. PORTIONS OF PLAN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY: NATHAN TAFT CORWIN III, LAND SURVEYOR _ ;,:=' �� !�%i� !�%�\�\\� \i\\ �� i `/ // / \ \ APPROXIMATE M.LW EL O.Of 1586 MAIN ROAD, JAMESPORT NY 11947 `�'�= ,� ��\�\\�\\�� \\� I \ \\\/\\ � /\' \ \/ SURVEY LATEST DATED AUGUST 25, 2013 / \/i,/ I \ EXISTING TIMBER JETTY I PROPOSED 10' LONG SHOREGUARD VINYL TO BE REMOVED IN I SHEETING - -- - - - ITS ENTIRETY LOCATION MAP N.T.S. RWATER LANE TYPICAL JETTY SECTION CLEA _ _ _ N.T.S. EXISTING BULKHEAD TO REMAIN _ -/ , APPROVED BY. ......... -_ y r BOARD OF I RUS TEES: \ __.-- �.. a, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ✓ r — —_—— —— EXISTING WOOD DECK \ �1 �1 DATES --_�� t ' \ vib _—— APE_ W� ED BRICK EXISTING STONE PATIO ` ` N 820.0=—— FRAMESTORY GARAE EXISTING WOOD DECK \ H 2q•\ m.p15STOR '\ \ p, FRAME RESIDENCE va •\ A `\ \ % / \ \ \ REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 40 LF TIMBER JETTY -- 982 99' \ WITH\TWL JEnY IN SAME LOCATION.SEE TYPICAL - - B1. SECTION THIS PAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS b �` __- - EXISTING Sf S TO REMAIN 2� \ O H 'p D ( P roposed Jetty Permit Plass SCALE: 1"=40' ED PLAN, DETAILS AND DATE: SEP - 4 :2018]a LOCATION MAP 5-13-18 8-27-18 45 NASSAU POINT ROAD Southold Town HOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Pord of T SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SHEET: N0. 1000-118-04-09 1 of 1 'i i I SURVEY OF LOT 63 AMENDED MAP A OF NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC -ILE No 156 FILED AUGUST 16. 1922 —-� SITUATE f t! " 1,�ry NASSAU POINT I' _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I[IOCT 7 Zola l •UFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORKJS.C. TAX No. 1000-118-04-09 UN 1 �O�OSCALE 1"=30' U UAV 1 O' FEBRUARY 27, 2002 SEPTLIJOER 3D.2009 FOUNDATION LOCATION MAY 12.2009 FINAL SURVEY AUGUST 25, 2013 UPDATE SURVEY Scuthold Town AREA = 38,810 sq 11• Board oI Trustees I (TO TIE LINES) 0 891 ac. ovVII1.a Roaul ANE CLEnRI�i ATLR.�-L---`-� G_ _TMIrrL. JOHN F. ALO1A `-3 ELVIRA T. ALOIA crnti:�cD�r6r 1 �'.' r ♦IVJ 1Pr _� 1 - ��r•"..�,.�r-rc�'�': i�,e."'Jr'+�la rah IY l2 (,+ II E' 4\ n n • N e2'GR'DD"E r .`��.�-�T��'��1��� �(}`�: ea ...>< L,St'+ 1 l E •\��. � t �S 11\ `Z_ ,•t I o`I \�, •l IIS'= - �� SD '^:c"�:`�'''; J ;,%fir.. a''{ 3 - ..or•e �`l..ilylyAlr,,,lJ ' 0�,,�// 08 ri �j cpr Ra r� _ l NIuJT+NL°n . 5 8700' W - 1 SEPTIC SYSTEM TIE DISTANCES n1CrARo w.cDrA+n G+6+ne I.W. __._ __-- _ :I.rry9JJ,Cr mll:UMTS M1t r5141rJCD COVER GARAGE CORNER"A" GARAGE CORNER"D„SEPTIC (R Ju v[�nM✓:psN N�ARDS mI r..maeal COVER TANK 51' As' t�IV OF NFA,} CESSPOOL COVER 1 A ?i • CESSPOOL COVER 2 I f� ti �01G! ,T,A I- N" •.1111{7 - I — —.q no X7.DR Ap°^ 1pN Nathan aft Corwin III 5 Ci�c 1).moi cb mx TAI: Rpr eEA,Rc Land Surveyor coats or nr,surrvEr WA Qac-IAKC.DS uE1Cv�5 0Im SCMSOCFLo P[a ua�p•RW CR• --- CERI1 W-5-GATED,IEAEON$1—AM S°[[[f:M TD.bra?ry J 1..l D J, LS DPLY 10 RIE GEm.TOR NN I.61RNT J—p.A ID9eVo L S LIRE CoNR u,7 aDw�14mO`Ui BE.zI Rn" Nlle Su 's-SuDd.wvvm- Sic F'ons - Lanvlru:DDn Lryeul ' To T.,O INSTDUDDu LERS MEPCOP sRD IWII QPILNTJ.IMS MC Nol T w Mn1E PHONE(631)727-2090 FDv(631)727-1727 '.E ECISTENDE 01%.hT 01 WATS Or XES LOCATED AT LMIUNC ADDRESS ANC/OR UEZMVITS OF RECORD.IT 1596 MWn Rd PO fibs 15 ANY,1101 SNO.v1 ARE NDT GUARANTEED. JameeDvrl Nem Y.,F 11947 J­,M NR TDrk 11901 - i I �I li - 1 r"'� 34 Years on Nassau suint Summer of purchase-1984 r• l 'bomb 4 1992 p ECEIV AUG 15 2018 - Southold Town 2003 r i ar s AUG i b 2018 '�- �..+ a . . �.r' f ....'-.,•Aum! . '"''."'f �s�j` ?M�"�A�iMM171� 114:*�+�r�� �i ` .,. a x b ►� r a r r A&40m` y ,L V ALoZ 1 5 2018 -_- WIN WNW . <. `�- `�"`, _ ,.. moi► -�- -. �.:-..,�'� . � �lc�'-L.�-aye,i��••,FL..,y���•,� p,��~ - .r —dd���_-.►.i rte.,�'_ - �.v-�� ` - 1W1. � ~• '`' � � � � � to O p o O f' 0 0.�- _•. w 14- 27- 2005 i 0 O- mftk D E C E I E AUG 1 Ol$ 10 Southoib, Town" Board f Irustees ! Soathold T Board of Tr MY '1Ih r4 Ilk VO 00 i .r d, I ,� . 2018 1' -d . 5 J� - +-....fir w AUG 1 5 2018 sout Bo 46 ., ( °o�]]a ;�i 0 rtw t i.. D - AUS .. - t _ r a. 1 • I 11 F • . 4 .rq i• n c v, -e:w ry mor r w• Cw • •. �^01..E h I• • .q s .40D i �. CD C:) 0 rn u -All _ 0 07)"- 1 5 _ w ONE"M a Y i 08. 06.!2006 V } 1 • September 5,2006,10:31:48 AM 2,463 of 6,893 is Ct Edit E � AEff -;i AUG 1 5 2018 1 Southold Town Board rustees _ y► I�M� 71M 'WR c a�- f+� . �„► ' 'fit-�.���.. • .�•;v9 i�.`�� art i AD AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town nar r k. tF AWW � a ;r►�r r y � . . 4.r..rte'� � e•� Y- �t iF October 18, 2016, 3:17:52 PM -- 6,158 of 6,893 '- U 0 low ^.I 'rafw ;,D 1 7 5 2018 September 25,2017,3:10'28 PM 758 W 1,070 a. t y.. I St September 25,2017,3 09 55 PM r� .r - / 4W,EC hIpELill AUG 1 5 2018 SoutholdTown r Y s y September 25,2017,3:14:24 PM 791 of 1,070 4or Iv AW-40 y Y 2018100 0 , Al 2018,8 3108 PM 890 of 1,070 rr June 25,2018,5:50:38 PM 992 of 1,070 • - AUG 1 5 2016 ,;"; _ y. • Southold Town April 28,2018,8 42 46 PM 910 of 1,070 «-1 r , H July 1,2018,8'32:38 PM 1,005 of 1,070 NEW- AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town Board of Trustees September 12,2016,3:28:28?M r r ti k t1 .r 'a July 11,2018,7:30:00 PM 15 o1 1,070 c_ ` ?JL 51 (� rlo C f co , r Alimmm .- ...` f DIVISION O✓ C. Y. R. 90WU'fi r2 STATE OF"NEIN YORK REAL PP.OFZRTY•MAPIAGEa?EidT COMMISSIONER _ - - - _. - • - - GEOI?GE W. S Iti - T. dT - EXECUTIVE- § PART'S ENT - _ '- : DIRECTOR ROS RT D. STONE,, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER - "OFFICI= OF GENERAL SERVICES 3uReAu OF 7+53 WASH INGTON AVENUE _ _ - - SUAFLUS REAL FRopsq'S'd - DANIEL ICLt_PAY. _ - _ _` _ CHARLES H. JENNINGS, AD&IIN15TRATIYE DIRECTOR _ ALBANY. N. Y. November 49- 1953 pSCEFVE AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town Dr. George C. Graham lord'of TrusM Nassau Point Long Island , Nein York Dear Dr. Graham: Several weeks ago you wrote us concerning a jetty erected by a Mrs. Dorothea So Chute into •the waters off the east side of Nassau Point . We have had the matter investigated by the Depart- ment of Public Works and find- that no permission has, ' been given by this Office or :he Departmenz of Public Works to Mrs . Chute. The Department of Public Works has _also per- sonally investigated the location .of ' the jetty. Ile will advise Mrs. Chute that an- application must be filed and a grant of easement given concerning the jetty.• Very truly yours ; C-HJ;bj Charles H. Jenn�as ;� J , Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Manne April 20, 2004 AUG 1 5 2018 Kennedy Lillis Schmidt&English Southold Town Attorneys at Law a of Trustee 75 Maiden Lane—Suite 402 New York,NY 10038-4816 Attn: Thomas C. Murphy Esq. Re: Groin Repairs and Beach Erosion Manago Vs Aloia and Costello Marine Contracting Corporation Cutchogue,NY-KLS&E File 4052 Gentlemen: This letter report constitutes my engineering evaluation and opinion, concerning the responsibility of the 60 ft. long Aloia beach stabilizing groin (jetty), causing "erosion" at the adjacent Manago beach property. After inspecting the beach, reviewing available data, references, photographs and depositions - my conclusions are: 1. The constructed and maintained Aloia groin, does not cause erosion of the Manago beach property. 2. Removal of the Aloia groin would cause (a) New erosion, undermining of the Aloia property and(b)Additional erosion of the Manago beach. 3. The deteriorated and partial stone groin on the Manago property, in its present condition, provides minimal protection and does not stabilize the Manago beach. 4 The vertical timber shore bulkhead, along the Manago beach, worsens the erosion. 5 The groin repairs by Costello Marine Contracting Corporation do not cause erosion of the Manago beach front. Olko Engineering Page 1 f t Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine The basis for the above conclusions will be delineated in the following sections of this letter report,entitled: I. Individuals and Firms Involved. 2. Approximate Chronology of Events 3. Basis for Manago Claim of ErosionD7AUG � E 4. Shore Conditions 5. Eroding Beaches 6. Retention of Sand by Existing Groins 5 2018 7. Description of Properties and Defects 8. Effect of the Aloia Groin Southold Town 9. Effect of the Manago Bulkhead ar of Trustee 10. Responsibility of Costello Marine Contracting Corp. 11. Concluding Comments 1. Individuals and Firms Involved Dr.John F.Aloia and Mrs.Elvira T.Aloia: Present Owners of the property on which the subject groin retains sand and forms the southern boundary. Dr, and Mrs. Aloia maintain the groin. They are defendants. Costello Marine Contracting Corp. Contractor who has repaired the beach protection works on the Aloia property They are defendants Mr. Vincent Manago and Mrs. Carol Manago Present Owners of the eroded beach, located immediately south of the Aloia property. They are the plaintiffs. 2. Aimroximate Chronolozy of Events The approximate dates of the major events, associated with the subject matter, are as follows: 1955 The 60 ft. long timber groin, on the south end of the Aloia property, was constructed by the former owner,Mr. Chute. 1960 Partial stone groin constructed on the Manago property, by the former owner, Mr. Purpura. Olko Engineering Page 2 i Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20, 2004 Mango Vs Aloia&Costello Marine 1984 Severe storm caused damages to waterfront properties. 1984 Dr. and Mrs. Aloia purchased the property from Mr. Chute. 1995 An ice storm damaged the Aloia groin. 1995 The outermost 14 linear feet of the Aloe groin was repaired by Costello Marine. New timber piles and sheeting were installed 1996 Mr. and Mrs, Manago purchased the property from Mr. Purpura. 1996 A new bulkhead was constructed along the Manago property. 1999 About 30 linear feet of the Aloia groin was repaired by Costello Marine, in the center, primarily by adding a second row of timber sheeting, plus a 30 ft long 6x6 inch timber stringer cap on top. 2001 About 16 linear feet of the Aloia groin was repaired by Costello Marine, at the shore end,primarily by adding a second row of timber sheeting. 2001 The 6x6 inch timber cap, on top of the Aloia groin, was removed by Costello Marine 3. Basis for Manal4o Claim of Erosion It is understood that the 16 feet of shore end repair work, performed in Year 2001 by Costello Marine, is the basis for the Manago claim of beach erosion caused by the Aloia groin. The claim appears to be that the previously deteriorated 16 linear feet of groin allowed sand to pass through and thus replenish the Manago beach. It is correct that some sand would pass through the 16 feet of previously detenorated Aloia groin —but an insignificant quantity. As subsequently discussed, such pass through sand will continue moving southward, because the Manago stone groin is inadequate. The sand is not retained and therefore, Manago does not have a sandy beach. Olko Engineering Page 3 f;l i nll� 5 2018 f I Sruthold Town I 'rd of Trustees t Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Manne 4. Shore Conditions The Aloia and Manago properties are located on a bluff, overlooking the east shore of Little Hog Neck, facing Little Peconic Bay. The Bay is about 4 miles wide, with shoals, but the waters are about 25 feet deep offshore of the two properties. The following excerpt from Reference 1, 4n Page 11-5 describes the general conditions at the Aloia and Manago properties. The shoreline curves around Indian Neck to a north/south orientation along Little Hog Neck This curve is interrupted by one inlet at Little Creek that is dredged yearly. Shoreline from the public beach south to Nassau Point is bulkheaded along its whole length with many groins. This shoreline is backed by a very steep bluff that quickly rises to more than 50 feet This bluff has eroded in places from groundwater seeps that are not associated with coastal erosion. Fetch across Hog Neck Bay to Jesup Neck is about 20,000 feet, and waves come directly from the east. Direction of littoral drift is very sensitive to wave direction and can reverse many times during a year, According to baymen, the tidal current along this shoreline always sets towards the south. Nassau Point seems to be elongating in response to Littoral drift and the tidal current. The shape of the bay, its dimensions and depths are such that normal wind/wave littoral drift does not occur, to replenish the subject beach. Instead, the beach is replenished by dredging of Little Creek Inlet, to the north of the Aloia and Manago properties, and pumping the sand onto the beach. The usual procedure is to use a floating dredge, with a connecting pipeline A mixture of sand and water is then pumped to shore, discharging onto the beach Predominant wave action transports the sand southward, to the Aloia and Manago area. The quantity of dredged sand placed on the beach, affects the nourishment of adjacent beaches. Depending on the seasons, the waves, currents and winds move the sand in different directions The occasional, severe storms erode the beaches, damage bulkheads and destroy stairs leading down onto the beaches. The sand is washed away, leaving a bedding of shingles(coarse pebbles and gravel). Whereas, the bluffs do not provide sand,because they are protected from erosion by bulkheading. ® E "AE VE A -1 0 fir 2018 Olko Engineering Page 4 Southold Town Boarjof Tr tee i f i Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20, 2004 Manago Vs AJoia&Costello Marine 5. Eroding Beaches The entire east side of the Little Hog Neck Peninsula is predominantly a natural shifting, changing and eroding beach - as evidenced by the following: 1. Home owners have built groins and bulkheads to save their beach front. There are 3 groins retaining sand, north of the Aloia groin The northernmost groin is the longest, retaining the most sand. The partial stone groin on the Manago property, to the south, is the shortest, retaining the least volume of sand. 2 Between the groins, wherever sand is not retained, the beach is coarse grained. In fact, south of the Manago stone groin, the beach is usually a coarse shingle (coarse pebbles and gravel) -the fines have washed away The Manago property does not have a suitable groin, similar to the properties to the north, it therefore has no retained sand - and no comparable beach. 6. Retention of Sand by Existing Groins As a further introduction to the subjects of groins, beach erosion, etc, the following excerpt from Reference 1, Page S-3, is of interest: The Peconic shores have been subjected to many erosion control structures to prevent landward migration Over its 136 miles of tidally influenced shoreline, more than a thousand groins have been built. Groins are prominent along the 35+ miles of sandy shoreline. Where houses have been constructed, about 50 percent of the shoreline is bulkheaded. Most of the more than 25 inlets are protected by betties. In 27 separate areas, the Town has undertaken almost 150 dredging projects since the 1960's. Suffolk County has dredged at least five creeks yearly since the 1950's. This heavy investment has maintained the shoreline, and few, if any, houses have been lost to erosion However, several areas still flood regularly, leading to property damage A high level of investment will continue to be necessary in the future to prevent loss of property and minimize damage In this letter report, the beach structure, between the Aloia and Manago properties, is correctly referred to as a "Groin" Although, the depositions refer to the structure as a "Jetty" — which is not correct because the structure does not train a channel inlet. ECEIVE IN 01ko Engineering ; Page 5 AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town B03W of 1rustees Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine The A1Oia and Manago properties are not isolated parcels of land but instead, located towards the southern end of Little Hog Neck, they are a part of the peninsula The two'properties must be evaluated in conjunction with the overall coastal complex. For example, the north/south coastline is about_3.8 miles long, but the Aloia property occupies only 99 linear feet of the shoreline—about 0.5 of one percent. Particularly important is the fact that north of the Aloia property are 3 relatively uniform groins having the following locations and distances from the 60 ft. long Aloia groin- 1 The first groin is located 200 feet north of the Aloia groin and extends 65 feet into the Bay. This groin marks the northern boundary of the neighbor (Mr. Fry) located immediately north of Aloia. Sand, traveling northward, is retained by this first groin, particularly during the summer season 2. The second groin is located 525 feet north of the Aloia groin and extends 60 feet into the Bay. Sand is retained by this second groin 3. The third groin is located 840 feet north of the Aloia groin and extends 100 feet into the Bay The largest volume of sand is retained by this third groin. Accordingly, sand is retained north of Manago by 4 separate groins (Aloia + 3). The volume retained by the Aloia groin is conservatively about 440 cubic yards (99 ft long, 60 ft wide, 2 ft thick). The 440 cubic yards of retained sand by the Aloia groin is absolutely insignificant in terms of' overall coastal sand movement If a case is to be made of sand being withheld from depositing and staying in front of the Manago property, attention is directed to the 3 groins north of Aloia The 3 groins influence a shoreline of at least 1,000 linear feet — compared to the Aloia and north neighbor shoreline of 200 feet,to the next groin. 7. Descriptions of Properties and Defects The Aloia property is 99 feet long and the Manago property is 150 feet long Both properties are similar, from a coastal engineering viewpoint in that they have a facing of vertical timber sheet piling and uniform offshore contours. Accordingly, wave energies are not dispersed/absorbed by the bluff, because of the solid bulkheading, Instead, any wave backwash Olko Engineering j t.�D E E � V l� Page 6 AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town Board of Trustees r Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine from the bulkheading tends to scour the beach. Whereas, the uniform offshore contours show that the overall effect of the short Aloia groin is insignificant, other than at the groin itself. The sand,moving southward,bypasses the filled 60 ft wide groin field. 134 properties have a groin. The 60 ft. long Aloia groin,at the south end of the property, is of timber sheet pile construction, and extends up about 2.5 to 3.0 above the adjacent Manago Reach. The Manago groin, towards the north end of the Manago property is located about 60 feet south of the Aloia groin. Its original purpose is not clear—either it represents partial construction of a groin, or foundation protection for a structure. Nevertheless, its presence on the beach causes it to act as a groin, retaining some sand. The Manago groin is constructed of random placed stone, rising about two feet above the beach and extends out into the Bay about 30 ft from the bulkhead. The Manago stone groin is too low, too short and has not been maintained. It is ineffective in retaining sand. However, between the Manago groin and the Aloia groin, the short(60 ft long)Manago Beach sometimes has a shallow layering of medium sand, deposited by southerly waves But, south of the Manago groin, the Manago beach is decidedly eroded, with a surfacing of coarse shingle. Accordingly, the Manago groin does, but to an insignificant extent,retain some sand. However, the Manago groin is too short and too low to be effective. The Manago groin is not only of insufficient size,but is also located at the wrong(north)end of the Manago property. Mr. Manago purchased a problem beach. Unfortunately, under present ,environmental regulations, it is very difficult to correct the situation in a reasonable, economic manner — by constructing a groin,particularly since Mr.Manago is on record as an advocate of groin removal. The Manago property lacks a south groin, and probably, only with some costly mitigation measures would a permit be obtained to construct a south groin. However, it would seem that a case could be made to allow rehabilitation and maintenance of the existing north,Manago stone groin — to at least retain a thicker layer of protective sand and beach at the north end of the Manago property. Another problem with the Manago beach construction is the access stair,which terminates about 1 '/2 feet above the shingle beach surface. The Contractor built the stair around the spring of 1996 when there was a surface layer of recently deposited sand. A mistake was make in not taking into account the seasonal/storm shifting sands on this coast. The stairs should have been constructed extending farther down, say about 2 feet, into the more stable shingle (coarse Olko Engineering Page 7 E C" E HE 0 AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town Board of Trustee Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine pebbles and gravel) beach material The longer stairs would have provided easier access to the lower beach surface,eroded by the winter storms. 8. Effect of the Aloia Groin Overall, the 5 groins combined, have little effect in terms of peninsula protection - because (1) They are all relatively short, compared to the water depths immediately offshore and (2) They are spaced too far apart. A unified "groin field" does not exist Each individual groin retains some sand, in front of the individual property-as is the situation at the Aloia property. The relatively short cell (200 ft. long) between the Aloia groin and the next groin to the north, does not collect any sand, once it is filled Instead, the sand bypasses alongside the cell and continues southward, where it would collect in front of the Manago property, if Manago had a groin at the south end of his property. The effect of the relatively short and low Aloia groin, adjacent to the Manago property, in terms of depriving Manago of sand - is absolutely insignificant. If the Aloia groin,did not exist, during a winter storm, both properties would experience the same "erosion", because the Aloia groin retains so little sand. In fact, the Manago beach would be eroded deeper because the Aloia groin disperses some of the north east wave energy and thereby "shelters", to some extent, the immediate Manago beach, up to the Manago stone groin - as witnessed by the deposit of finer graded sand between the Aloia and Manago groins. The various photos and measurements showing a difference in height of beach at the Aloia groin, are misleading It is not a fact that the Aloia groin "permanently" withholds sand from the Manago beach and thereby causes erosion at Manago Instead, the fact is that if the Aloia groin was removed, the very small volume of sand, retained by the Aloia groin, would very quickly pass through the Manago property and then, both properties would look "eroded". The photos showing differences in elevations at the groin are not necessarily photos showing erosion of the Manago Beach. Instead, the photos show what would be the condition at the Aloia property, if there was no groin. Or, expressed in another way, the photos show the sand that could be retained, if the Manago stone groin had been completed and properly maintained 9. Effect of the ManalZo Bulkhead The Manago bulkhead is of relatively recent construction - and has a detrimental effect on the Manago beach front E � V E n) Olko EngineeringPage 8 AUGL I 1 5 2018 Southold Town _ Boad of Trustoes Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine Prior to the Manago bulkhead reconstruction, the old deteriorated bulkhead sheeting, with portions missing, dispersed wave energy on the soil slope in back and even provided.some beach fill, resulting from wave wash of the backfill. But with construction of the new, intact bulkhead, wave run-up on the vertical wall, with backwash, erodes away what little sand accumulates in front of the Manago bulkhead Unfortunately, without an adequate stone and and additional groin at the south end of the Manago property, sand is not retained, to dampen the wave action Presently, the underlying coarse shingle beach protects the Manago bulkhead from being further undermined, by normal storm action. The material list for the Manago bulk-head indicates 16 ft long fender piles and 14 ft long sheet piles. Accordingly, the penetration of the timber fender and sheet piles,below the shingle beach surface, is about 8 and 6 feet respectively 10 Responsibility of Costello Marine Contractinp,Corp. The Costello Marine Contracting Corporation has no responsibility for the lack of retained sand along the Manago beach The groin repairs, performed by Costello, do not impact on the Manago Property conditions The bulkhead constructed by Costello Marine on the Aloia property is, from a coastal stabilization viewpoint, the same as the bulkhead constructed by Manago — but, with the groin retaining sand, the Aloia bulkhead and stairs leading down to the beach are afforded additional protection from wave backwash and erosion. The top 6"W'00 ft long timber cap placed by Costello Marine on top of the Aloia groin in 1999, and subsequently removed in 2001, had no effect because of its small size and location at the upper beach elevation In fact, it was observed that no change in sand retention occurred, with or without,the 6 inch high timber cap. On the 3 separate occasions, when Costello Marine repaired the groin, new timber sheeting was added In 1995 the 14 linear feet of outermost ice damaged sheeting was removed, because of the severity of the damage, and new sheeting was driven in its place. Whereas, for the 1999 center 30 ft and for the 2001 inshore 16 ft., it was possible to drive new sheeting alongside the old sheeting, because the old sheeting was still in alignment, for the 30+16 feet Essentially, the new sheeting sealed some gaps in the old sheeting and strengthened the double sheeted structure against wave impacts Accordingly, today, the outshore 14 ft of groin has one row of 2 inch sheet piles Whereas, the inshore 46 ft, has two rows of back to back 2 inch sheet piles The differences in thickness, between one row of sheeting Vs two rows, is a structural matter only The total thickness of sheeting has no effect whatsoever on the movements,of sand along the beach front The double row of sheeting, for the inshore 46 linear feet of groin, does not in itself cause additional retention of sand, as compared to having only one row of sheeting, Olko Engineering LQ V LL= Page 9 AUG 1 5 2018 UU Southold Town e Groin Construction&Beach Erosion April 20,2004 Manago Vs Aloia&Costello Marine Costello Marine has performed the usual function of a contractor. In turn, Aloia has the right to maintain and protect his property from damage. 11, Concluding Comments The existing condition of the beach, in front of the Manago property, is a natural condition It appears "eroded", only by contrast, because the adjacent low, short Aloia groin retains some sand. If the Aloia groin did not exist, the Manago beach would not have more sand in front. Instead, the Aloia beach would appear the same as the Manago beach. Both properties are in an erosion zone— where the "natural' stable beach is essentially a coarse shingle beach—not a sand beach. The amount of sand, retained by the Aloia groin is insignificant. Without the groin, the sand would wash away, at high tide, during the first .moderate winter storm — and quickly pass southward through the Manago property The coast, north of Manago, has sand only because property owners have built/maintained groins. The beaches are artificially replenished with sand by the dredging of the inlet. However, the Manago property lacks a suitable groin and therefore,-the sand traveling southward, is not retained—but bypasses the Manago property, leaving a coarse shingle beach I? N SsS M. Very truly yours, C �° � 9n � ,{�'� S.M. OLKO_ Y. 2�jQ� References: �� F g3 �O 1 Town of Southold Erosion Management Plan,November 1995,Revised January 1996 2 Letter Report by EN-Consultants,Inc. dated October 10, 2001 3. Letter Report by FPM Group, Ltd., dated November 17,2003 Manago Vs Alow p c s 7 Olko Engineering I Page 10 I AUG 1 5 2018 i Southold Town iFloarJ ofTrustees - Dr. John F.Aloia 39 Nassau Boulevard Garden City,New York 11530 Board of Trustees Albert J. Krupski,President James King, Vice President Peggy A Dickerson Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda P.Q. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 May 5, 2005 Dear Trustees: Please accept my apologies for not being able to attend the meeting regarding the application to remove the jetty, presented by the Managos and their attorney, Charlotte Biblow. Both my wife and daughter were present on April 20, 2005.However, we were represented by Robert Gaffney, in order to defend ourselves against the attempts of the Managos(and Schiff)to force removal of our jetty. Our feeling is that the Managos are trying to circumvent the Supreme Court by applying for this permit knowing that a lawsuit they brought against us, which questions ownership and asks for$I million in damages, is still pending. They have also enlisted their neighbor, Schiff, who filed suit, after the Managos,using the same attorney. I wish to apprise the trustees of the followingto o help in your decision regarding this permit application and request that these facts are read into the minutes of the May 18'hearing: I Ownership of the Jetty The jetty was built by the previous owner of our home, Dorothea Chute, over 50 years ago, following the advice of the Army Corps of Engineers. The jetty was purchased by us as part of our home purchase in 1984. Although asked to participate in the building of jetties on their property, the previous owners of the Managos' property,Dr. Pupura, and the previous owner of the Schiff's property, Dr. Cacciola, had decided to forgo the expense of building jetties over 50 years ago. Mrs. Chute decided to build the jetty, on her own property, at her own expense, to protect the beach in front of her home. E ID AUG 1 5 2018 1 Southold Town __ )ard of Trustees r l When we purchased the property in 1984, our survey showed the jetty being completely on our property. (Please see the attached survey.)In fact,our title insurance has a specific rider stating so. The Purpuras as well as all the other neighbors have confirmed that it was built and maintained by the previous owner of our property. The expense of maintaining the jetty has been borne solely by me. We recognize that survey techniques have changed, and it is not unusual on Nassau Point, for there to be discrepancies of inches over the property line. Our neighbor's shed to the North is partly on our property according to new surveys. We would never dream of applying to the Town to have them move it, or declare it ours so we can destroy it. II Repair of the Jetty The jetty has always been a functional jetty. During an ice storm in 1995, the seaward end of the jetty was damaged. We hired Costello Marine to repair our jetty and he applied for and attained all the necessary permits to do so. Further repairs were done under the same permit by Costello in 1999. When the Managos reconstructed their bulkhead in 1996, the heavy equipment damaged the stringers on the landward portion of our jetty. During the repair made by Costello in 1999, he placed a single stringer on top of the groin. We were later told that this was non-conforming, and Costello was instructed to and did remove it. We hired Costello Marine again in 2001 to replace a deck, At that time, we asked him to perform minor repairs to the sheathing of the jetty, which he considered not to require a permit. Managos and their attorney complained to the DEC stating that Costello made repairs to"their"jetty without their permission. At the urging of Managos'attorney, the DEC requested a new survey from us to determine ownership;we did the survey as requested. Realizing that the Managos had hired an attorney, we too obtained legal advice. Our attorney contacted the DEC to inform them that the issue of ownership is not within their jurisdiction, they should not have ordered a new survey, and that the original survey we have on file in Southold Town is the one we stand by. We wish to stress again, that the jetty has been continually functional and has not changed in dimension since we first purchased it. III Waterfront Property is Subject to Erosion Property owners on Nassau Point built jetties to preserve their beaches with the advice of the Army Corps of Engineers in the 1950's. Some owners to the South of us elected not to make this investment,thus diminishing the relative value of their properties. Managos purchased 1.3 acres of bay front property for$325,000, much below market value, in 1996,with the full understanding of the condition of achMVE that it clearly is not protected by a wooden jetty. f� D L� 2 The Managos have presented selective pictures to the Town showing their beach, according to them, at its worst with seaweed and rocks. As of today, there is actually more sand on the Managos beach than ours! (Please see the photographs attached.) As for Schiff, the Managos have a rock jetty that was built on their beach. If Schiff wishes to improve the beach in front of his house and sincerely believes this can be accomplished by the destruction of a jetty, it is the rock jetty in front of Managos beach he should petition to dismantle. Additionally, they may both consider that perhaps the new and prominent bulk heading they, as well as their neighbors to the,south, have installed has made it more difficult to retain sand. IV Impact on Nassau Point I am concerned about a discussion that I heard took place at the Trustees meeting that it is possible we could be ordered to alter or remove our jetty. Such an action would not only impact the beach in front of my home, and my property value;this decision would adversely affect our immediate neighbors to the north, the Frys. If this can be ordered,then all the jetties on Nassau Point would be at risk for removal or alteration. If the Managos are granted their wish to destroy our jetty, are we then to apply to destroy the Frasier jetty, then Frasier the jetty to his North?We would hope that the town would not make a decision to alter our jetty unless it was considering making changes to all the jetties on Nassau Point. Again, the reason the jetties were built is because the residents of Nassau Point were advised by the Army Corp of Engineers in the 1950's that unless they build their own jetties there is no realistic hope of avoiding erosion of their beaches. We are grateful that we were able to find a property that the previous owner took heed to the advice in the 50's and respectfully request that we are allowed to maintain and preserve the condition of our property. We have enjoyed our home on Nassau Point. It has been a refuge for our family for 21 years. We enjoyed friendly relationships with our previous neighbors,the Purpuras, the Cacciolas, and the Grahams. We still enjoy warm relations with our other neighbors who abide by the old code of conduct where we all remain considerate of each others privacy and quiet enjoyment The Managos' and Schiff's continual intrusive behavior(tearing down our decorative picket fence, building berms to block our view, the law suits,,the interruption of birthday parties, and intimidation of my children and grandchildren while they play, fish, and swim)has been unbearable. Additionally, in terms of this permit application, we believe that in the same way that the Managos tried petitioning the DEC to have them decide ownership of the jetty, they are attempting to use the Board of Trustees to achieve the same result and to declare that their beach has been damaged by our lawfully existing jetty, even though no such damage exists. ECNVE i AUG 1 5 2018 3 Southold Town ----Board of Trustees I r We are hopeful that the board will defer these decisions to the Supreme Court. We also wish that somehow the Mangos will come to recognize that to destroy what is ours will not be a gain for them, that they will someday have an appreciation for the beauty that surrounds them, and feel the serenity that many of us have benefited from in previous years on Nassau Point. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. I can be reached at (516)663- 2442. Please note that I will be out of the country from May 6, 2005 until May 17, 2005. If you need additional information during this time, please feel free to contact my daughter Maria Davani at (516)656-9048. Thank you for your time and consideration. Resctfully, , 041 evw John F. Aloia cc: Brownell Johnston, Esq., Legal Advisor to the Board of Trustees Philip Nykamp, Esq., Twomey,Latham, Shea &Kelley,LLP Nancy Weiner, Esq., U.S.A.A, Casualty Insurance Company Lauren Standish Heather Tetrault ® E E VE r l AUG 1 5 2018 Southold Town Boad o rus e 4 l� TUTH/LL ROAD LOT 62 N.8,?'X 00•E FR e40c 1.0-V 405 46 i I f y .d0,v =vJ 09',f 84047 �a• J NON ANO D o�;ayssO>s v .r/arS 359.55• 1 OT .Yrr/ 7 ass Z) ti ti O fA SCFEE Z n O �� �'/Sc' ,Y_14 all.I�h I I „1 � J 25 li; O �� a4 � cq_. �' SLA cE 1 "� • C p WOOD IIIb ,moi �� v ✓ AA 7100. b STAJRS , O Z °tJ•[ f°f1i�1tR1 III —r --1 nl tl:W F.vO 3323 • �.tc ce�' i ,O .vJ00 JET Jr,\ Z � 135 SrK s: Yl•d• � r �� S.82'CO GYI•• 37850 z � LOT 64 jI J C) CER TIFIE o TO L4WrERS T/TLE 1.'ISURAACE CORP Z-) 711-L E N? 84 538/ MAP OF 1011NF ALO/A (�C� rEL/V/R•A T ALO/.4LOT 63kff.VDD .V4P .4 �-F LdkaNASSAU FONT' ain street FiLEO aUG./5i92_J FicE y� 755 �- - new york 11901 717 M SOF`->LK CC7%Jiy r,.v Y LArvo SN) Job No.84-525 C ,9 Scale -I• = 50' C cG7 -- --- -- -- --- ---- ____----' 0 o- C_Jl C M � r DiSalvo, Diane From: David Kilbride <dwkilbride@gmail com> Sent: Monday,August 06, 2018 11:40 AM To: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: Trustees' August Public Hearing Agenda- Aloia Diane - Thanks for your and Elizabeth's assistance for me to obtain some copies of some pages from this file. I understand that the Site Visit is scheduled for tomorrow. I do have an observation regarding the Application which I'd appreciate your forwarding to Mr. Domino prior to his Site Visit. The Application is to "Remove and replace 60 LF of existing jetty....." According to my records, the existing jetty consists of a 65' length which originally dates back to the 1960's (originally built without permits based on old neighborhood correspondence)plus a further 14' seaward extension which was approved by the Trustees in 1995. Thus, if my records are correct, the current jetty measures a total of 79 feet. Does the applicant intend to remove ALL of the 79' and build 60'new(19' shorter in length)? Or do they intend to remove just 60' of the existing 79' and replace that 60' such that they still have a 79'jetty? The Application is not clear in this regard. I am sure that the team tomorrow arrives for the Field Visit with measuring devices in hand, but I did just want to point out this ambiguity in the language in the Application. Many thanks for all of your assistance. Dave Kilbride P.S. Diane - Hopefully the A/C in your office will be repaired quickly I! P. O. Box 1305 9045 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York. 11935 203-228-o861 (Mobile) -preferred 631-734-2354 (home) dwkilbride ftm ail.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:08 AM, DiSalvo, Diane <diane.disalvonao,town.southold.ny.us> wrote: Yes, but you will have to fill out a FOIL form in order for us to be able to give them to you. You can fill out the form when you get here. 1 Dianie From: David Kilbride [mailto:dwkilbride(abgmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2018 9:07 AM To: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: Re: Trustees' August Public Hearing Agenda Diane - Thanks. I'm not an adjoining neighbor so wouldn't get the direct notice. May I stop by your office to pick up a copy of the materials that have been submitted? Dave Kilbride P. O. Box 1305 9O4S Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York. 1ig3,r, 203-228-o861 (Mobile) -preferred 631-734-2354 (home) dwkilbride a gmail.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:57 AM, DiSalvo, Diane <diane.disalvogtown.southold.ny.us> wrote: Yes, at this time the matter is scheduled to be on our August 15, 2018 agenda. 2 1-r,�V41.S,P,1!V i Southold 'l`o`on Trustees Town l fall Annex./H rst Floor 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold.INTI' 11971-0959 (631) 765-1892- Fax: (631) 765-6641 From: David Kilbride [mailto:dwkilbride@amail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2018 10:49 AM To: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: Trustees' August Public Hearing Agenda Diane - I understand that an application for repair of a Jetty by Aloia at 8145 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue may have been submitted to the Trustees. If this is the case, could you let me know if that application is on the Agenda for discussion at the Trustees' August 15 Public Hearing? Many thanks for your assistance. Dave Kilbride 3 P. O. Box 1305 904r, Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York. 203-228-o861 (Mobile) -preferred 631-734-2354 (home) dwkilbride(cry gmail.com 4 Michael J. Domino, President Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer, III, Vice-President H x 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith ,a ^'n1� P.O. Box 1179 A Nicholas Krupski Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williamsazs Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA c/o JEFFREY PATANJO Please be advised that your application dated June 1, 2018 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of August 15, 2018 and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items checked off below. xx Revised Plans for proposed project Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 1St Day of Construction ($50.00) 'h Constructed ($50.00) xx Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) 30-Year Maintenance Agreement (complete original form enclosed and submit to Board of Trustees Office) The Permittee is required to provide evidence that the non-turf buffer condition of the Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES. TOTAL FEES DUE: $ 50.00 aq1a,tl� BY: Michael J. Domino, President � 200 Board of Trustees Maim Diane From: Edward Volini <edward.volini33@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 13, 2018 9:39 AM 1 To: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: Trustee Meeting August 15 -Aloia Jetty Dear Diane, I just wanted to quickly show my full support to my neighbors David Kilbride,Vincent Manago and David Bergen about the application to build a new jetty. It is obvious this jetty has had negative consequences for all of us south and a new one will have even more negative consequences. I have owned 8625 Nassau Point Rd now for 12 years and even I have seen the negative effect that Jetty has by collecting and holding all the sand to the north. I am sorry I cannot attend in person but just wanted to be on the record that I do not agree with the proposal to build a new jetty and that the old one has hurt all of us to the south. Thank you for your time. Ed Volini 8625 Nassau Point Rd. 1 DiSalvo, Diane From: Carol And Vincent Manago <cvmanago@aol.com> Sent: Thursday,August 09, 2018 9:53 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Nass Pt- Neighbor Kilbride Dave and Kathy, Nass Pt- Neighbor. Bergen Dave; Nass Pt Neighbor Drs Paul &Laurie Konowitz; Nass Pt Neighbor Keating Stanley Subject: Aloia jetty proposal 8/15/18 Board of Trustees Meeting Dear President Domino and members of the Board: I am the homeowner of the property directly south and adjacent to the Aloias. As you are aware,the renovated, existing jetty has had a significant deleterious effect on my property and the neighboring properties to the south. The town's file contains the long history of the devastation caused by the jetty, so there is no reason to reiterate those facts at this time. In addition to other factors (height, low profile, etc.)which I know the board will consider, I believe a critical issue to be considered is the length of the new jetty. I would like to respectfully request that the Board direct its attention to the actualMLWM which I understand will be the determining factor. The Mean Low Water Mark(MLWM) indicated on the site map of the Aloia application is a gross misrepresentation of reality. We have owned our house for more than 22 years and have NEVER seen the low water point near the end of the 'e --- at the 60 foot point as erroneously depicted by the site map. See photos attached taken on August 8, 2018 which were taken at low tide. They clearly demonstrate that the low water mark on the Aloia beach at the jetty is about 34 feet. The highest low water mark on my property is about 29 %2 feet at the low tide mark stake placed by David Kilbride, a neighbor to the south. As you walk further south on my property it narrows to 11 %feet and then to 7 feet on the next beach south(Konowitz). That is often the maximum beach we have at low tide with virtually NO beach at high tide,please see photos attached. Our goal is to have everyone have a nice beach; our neighbors to the south and the Aloia Family, our neighbor to the north. I believe a jetty approximately 30 feet long in a low profile design would accomplish that goal. Respectfully submitted for your consideration Vincent Manago i Z Az uzoij Juan sa �} • 41 ` - _ �'" •':`'�E� - .fir �-� - -t+• b 4 ,^ y 4 1. b Nr .A tti •r. �„ r\ r it I r �• • �- �s � �Se r r. Alm dodo r - ' door r � .r 9045 Nassau Point Road PO Box 1305 Cutchogue, New York 11935 August 9,2018 Town of Southold Board of Trustees 0 V Attn: Michael Domino, President ��` l! AUG 0 2018 Town Hall Annex Southold, New York 11935 Southold Town Boar of Trustees Re: Aloia Public Hearing—August 15, 2018 Dear Mr. Domino and the Board of Trustees: We are writing to ask you to consider a"Denial without Prejudice"of the Aloias'submitted application for replacement of their 64'jetty.We request this decision due to substantial erroneous information contained in the various materials they have provided for your consideration. We are long-time property owners on Nassau Point Road located 600 feet to the South of the proposed jetty. Over more than 30 years we have watched our beach area wash away due to the presence of Aloias'oversized, high profile jetty. Additionally,we believe that the current jetty structure may be lacking some of the approvals which should have been sought through the years to maintain and renovate the structure. With respect to the inaccurate information in the pending application: 1) The most significant error regarding the replacement lapping is found on the"Proposed Jetty Permit Plans"document which reflects a MLW line roughly 55'—60'seaward of their Bulkhead. This dimension is then used to justify their request for the construction of a 60' replacement bulkhead based on the current Town Code. Fact: On the afternoons of Tuesday August 7(2:30 p.m.)and Wednesday August 8(3:30 pm)at dead low tide(average tidal height cycles) Peconic Bay waters were lapping 34'from the Aloia bulkhead, not 60'. 1 have photos and measurements which I can share with the Board to substantiate this fact. I stood also in the water at dead low tide at the end of the current jetty where the submitted Location map places the MLW line and I was standing in 2%feet of water (see picture attached). This is a critical error in the Application and any decision about the replacement needs to be based on accurate measurements. 2) Also,the application falsely states that the proposed 60'jetty will allow beach walkers to pass around the seaward end of the jetty at low tide. Fact: At that exact location on 8/8/2018 at 3:30 p.m.at dead low tide there was a water depth of 2 Meet. Contrary to the language in the Aloia application,there will be no water's edge pedestrian passage with a 60'jetty as proposed. 3) The application erroneously states"There will be no effect on wetlands." Fact: Southold's Mark Terry's Memorandum to the Board of Trustees dated June 27,2018 states that the proposed action does not comply with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policy Standards and he further states:"The existing groin structure interrupts the longshore drift of unconsolidated materials(sand);starving the properties to the south." He includes a photo with his Memorandum which clearly illustrates the damaging impact that the current jetty/groin has had on the wetlands portions of our properties to the South. Hence,the replacement of this jetty/groin would continue to have a significantly damaging impact on wetlands and properties to the South.The wetlands have been decimated by the Aloias'jetty. 4) The application states(a)that the"closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of the wetlands is 2000 feet. The application states(b)that the"closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands is 2000 feet" Fact: There are all sorts of structures-bulkheads,decks, neighborhood residences,Aloia Guest House-in the immediate project area. In fairness to the Applicants,there is at least one true statement in the Application. They state that the reason for their request to rebuild the jetty is to retain sand on their Beach. Unfortunately,their jetty has a disproportionate and detrimental effect on neighboring properties over a period of many years. As neighbors who have suffered the negative impacts of this jetty for years,we respectfully ask the Trustees to use the occasion of this current Aloia Application to conduct an in-depth review of the jetty's impact to our neighborhood. Our preference would be a mandate for the total removal of the current jetty. However, if some replacement is deemed justified, PLEASE consider carefully the site measurements(independently conducted and verified before granting any approval)and consider carefully the scale and dimensions of any replacement structure which may be approved. And, PLEASE, check back after construction to verify that whatever might be constructed conforms to whatever you might approve. This situation has continued for decades. The ability of our beaches to benefit from the natural southward migration of sand has never been more urgent,as easily evidenced by aerial photography (Google Maps). We ask that the trustees deny the current Aloia application until they submit a request that properly states the facts. We then ask you to please apply your best practices and your fair thinking in formulating a decision on how to proceed. Thank you for your service to the Southold community and for the commitment of each member of the Board to prote ing our precious natural environment and resources. Sincerely, LSI Kathleen nd Davi Kilbride a f / f '1 .1 3:30 p.m. Wednesday August 8, 2018. Dead low tide. Subject is standing 60' seaward of Manago bulkhead in 2% feet of water at the end of existing Jetty and proximate to the proposed seaward end of replacement Jetty. Aloia Jetty Application places the MLW line in this location. Orange stake is low tide line on Manago Beach. 29' below their bulkhead. Aloia Beach at the same time along the North edge of the Jetty was 34' in depth (bulkhead to water line). DiSalvo, Diane From: David Kilbride <dwkilbride@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 07, 2018 3:26 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Paul Konowitz;Vincent and Carol Subject: Trustees' Site Visit 8/8/18 -Aloia Attachments: IMG_3045.JPG;IMG_3047.JPG Diane - I promise that this will be the final e-mail from me this week. Thanks so much for all of your assistance. Would you please forward this to Mr. Domino prior to tomorrow's site visits? Mr. Domino - Thank you for your interest and time and effort invested in the discussion regarding the Aloia Jetty at their home at 8145 Nassau Point Road. As you know, there is an engaged group of neighbors living to the South of the structure who feel that the current jetty,through its various iterations, has damaged our properties over an extended period of time. On behalf of the two neighbors immediately to the South of the jetty (and with their expressed approval - and they are copied on this e-mail), I did some "site work" this afternoon and I'd like to share with you what I observed. This was at just 2:30 this afternoon, dead low tide. Paul and Laurie Konowitz live two houses to the South(down drift of the jetty) at 8425 Nassau Point Road. The photo in attachment#1 (aluminum stairs in background) shows a stake roughly at the center of their property frontage at the water's edge. At dead low tide there is Seven feet of beach between the stake at the water's edge and the sheathing of their bulkhead. The second photo is of the Manago beach, adjacent to and directly to the South of the jetty (8225 Nassau Point Road). The stake in the foreground is near the Manago/Konowitz boundary, is set at the water's edge and is I F from the sheathing. The second stake on Managos'beach which is in the background of the photo and set just to the lee of the jetty measures a 29' beach right in that location. Hopefully the stakes will remain in position until your visit tomorrow. However, my most revealing observation was the following. While measuring the Manago beach I looked across the jetty to the Aloia side. Their low tide beach right at the jetty extends 5' further into the Bay than Managos': Thirty Four feet(34') of beach. Based on their site plan submitted with MLW marked and their 60' Application request one might infer that they presently have 60' of beach at low tide. Based on today's observation that absolutely is not the case. They have roughly half that amount of Beach which hopefully would be a factor in denying any consideration of a 60'jetty. I know that your Board is thorough with your measurements and discernments but I don't know at what stage of the tide cycle you will be inspecting tomorrow and I am providing this information with the hope that it will assist you in your consideration. Thanks again for all that you do on behalf of the residents of Southold and the preservation of our fragile environment. Dave Kilbride 1 P. O. Box 1305 9045 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York. 11935 203-228-o861 (Mobile) -preferred 631-734-2354 (home) dwkilbride(&gmail.com 2 �,,,d+u��-+•—-'-mss - --�_ "',�►T' � _ - . v - ;,;ter-•i..� �' ;rR_= y`. .,". -.,�—a-�•- i :. •' •.a,.+�.... � ,, -,gyp a; �` 5 :,hw. �•� 1 ^�+ �aY � :'7t' A X:,i� �ray..� 'c I _ m7- 17- All z T? ' �. a stagy. ' '" #. ��• ja `+�4�.- s�� F J. � n'�yam. 4! ;l"vY �M� •..F � M ; vim _ Y 1� ii• \ 1 ?-4 Safi• �-. ��4L q Michael J. Domino,Presid$11FF0(� f �Q �'� Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President O GV_ 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith y P.O.Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams p! Telephone(631)765-1892 �a Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i Date/Time: 7 1 Completed in field by: (� � ► Jeffrey Patanjo on behalf of JOHN & ELIVRA ALOIA requests a Wetland Permit to remove and replace 60'linear feet of existing jetty in same location as existing with new vinyl jetty. Located: 8145 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-118-4-9 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=q Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 1z Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: f II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application compJleteness/comments/standards: UC ,z,Its 6ocV- o� Toa u I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner: Present were: V J. Bredemeyer '�// M. Domino �� G. Goldsmith `/ N. Krupski G. Williams Other ohn&Elvira Aloia 8145 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue SCTM#: 1000-118-4-9 17/18 i - . - _TWINS= -- ...;,ear.— – 4 �, •tisr�r� . .•+����p 't'� .,�«�.•w:",R �..k'� ' rte - C. ti ��•C,`. .�"" Ss•,, i 'tea Lam, i.- \�1.�. !,►,'; ` .-1.T�.t'.•w. ;-�.;? .ti�``� �-,T S�{-�:'r: - Y; -sd - � +._i ..>;• sem. �._ y� r +S'`. �'� r. f`� :y,._ •.��� `„ '�+w.M4r-., '�Z'^'�y `,,,` a.•Y" "�"`.'".. r+�.t��"''y��J'�`'�,.�, _'�'�-y� ' �_v,,,� �1-�'y♦ '�• �..�.,�i�ap _ •...\�� �' - { ' •.y 'yam s 3� 'C T` l s, {�l s t � y .it_ �: ` _ v „ , . Elvira Aloia �8145 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue 000 - ” - �� 7 /2018- 13 , 22 i r E e � _ ohn&Elvira Aloia 8145 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue - SCTM#: 1000-118-4-9 8/7/18 Ot IE 4r2 '—.jam` •• �� � '6':k j 0 • 7. t Photo 1 (2/24/18) 1 r` Photo 2 (2/24/18) e Photo 3 (2/24/18) 'SI Photo 4 (2/24/18) 1 N BEE SEC.111 ryn , _YATCH__�__ UNE_ O c+ a 1a Wunnewela __ £2 1 p \ ^ Pontl TOWN WfHOID _ qmu 1yY1 Os� 10 Aw4 eti^ �_ a3 41 P P te. a �. 029 a laA(=) a Pr s,-� � ., •, a t • n♦ 4.2 • te, ,tY�i `fa s P \. GANq` 11.4 11.2A(c) �� s Q L-9— % 1 1ANc1 P 10 l 1A1 11µc1 J 9 db \ �O Ap 'Y Ss O COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C E ar Real Pro erv;ce Agency v e M z N Property T 1t " 18 August 27, 2018 Town of Southold Trustees Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Rte. 25 rEC E I V EP.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 - 42018RE: 8145 NASSAU POINT RD- CUTCHOGUE SCTM No. 1000-118-04-09 thold town REVISED PLANS Dear Trustees: Attached please find four copies of revised plans based on comments addressed at the August 15; 2018 public hearing. If you should have any-questions or require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-484-9332. Very truly yours, )effrey Pa P.O. Box 582 Bohemia, NY 11716 f, J 1 July 23, 2018 Town of Southold Trustees Town Hall Annex Building , E C � � V E 54375 Rte. 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUL 2 6 2018 RE: 8145 NASSAU POINT ROAD-CUTCHOGUE Southold Towyn SCTM No. 1000-118-4-9 Board of Trustees AUTHORIZATION Dear Trustees: Attached, please find one original and three copies of the Authorization From for the above referenced project. If you should have any questions or require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-484-9332. Very truly yours, ffrey Patanjo P.O. Box 582 Bohemia, NY 11716 yard of Trustees Applicati, AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We,_ Iola a-P F/1// owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- — in the town of CV"Qq y- ,New York,hereby authorizes to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. PropeAy Owner's Signature Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 7 DAY OF J 2010 otary Public CAROLYN T MAZE7York Notary Public-state of NO.O1MA607366lualified in NassauMyCommissionExpires v � r Cantrell, Elizabeth From: MARIA DAVANI <mariadavani@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 11, 2018 1:05 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: Aloia Application - 8145 Nassau Point Road Dear Elizabeth, I spoke with Diane this morning regarding a field inspection that I thought would take place today.The Trustees were unaware that I am authorized to speak on behalf of my parents. If they have any concerns or questions regarding this application or if they need an historical perspective on the jetty or any documents regarding the same they can feel free to contact me via e-mail or phone at home: (516) 656-9048 or cell: (516)330-2707. Thank you, Maria Davani 1 OFFICE LOCATION: � S® �® MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �® �® P.O. Box 1179 AL 54375 State Route 25 low Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) �s Southold, NY 11971 a� Tel 631 765-1938 ® Fax: 631765-3136 c4UNTV9� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Domino, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date: June 27, 2018 Re: Local Waterfront Coastal Consistency Review for ALOILA, JOHN & ELVIRA SCTM# 1000-118-4-9 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the'action is INCONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. C. Minimize interference with natural coastal processes by.- 1. y.1. providing for natural supply and movement of unconsolidated materials and for water and wind transport. 2. limiting intrusion of structures into coastal waters. The proposed action does not comply with this policy. The existing groin structure interrupts the longshore drift of unconsolidated materials (sand); starving the properties to the south (see Figure 1). v x " i ^ p m�` ban ,�ict��� ,.r.�+�:�` •' Y_� �fit•°= z». ` �. Figure 1. Subject property and longshore drift affected by the groin. It is recommended that the structure is shortened and lowered (low profile) to normalize and improve sand movement. See Wetland Permit 8080 for groin design to north. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Damon Hagan, Assistant Town Attorney FQI,��a Peter Young,Chairman H Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 �► '►` Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., July 11, 2018 the following recommendation was made: Moved by John Stein, seconded by James Abbott, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of JOHN F. ALOIA & ELVIRA T. ALOIA to remove and replace 60 If. of existing jetty in same location as existing with new vinyl jetty. Located: 8145 Nassau Point Rd., Cutchogue. SCTM#118-4-9 Inspected by: John Stein, James Abbott Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried ®f sour Domino,President �d Town Hall Annex D Michael J. o �® l0 John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders �, Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith Telephone(631) 765-1392 A.Nicholas Krupski ®�'�cDUNT�,� Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit _/ Amendment/Transfer/Extensi n [�, —Received Application: ��� Received Fee: Completed Application: �'• Sp JUN 2048 =! Incomplete: ` SEORA Classification: Type I_ Type II Unlisted � Lead Agency Determination: Southold Totvn of Trticnn9 ij �Coordination:(date sent): (� ® 1 LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Sent: 0 CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: 7•// Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: JS Resolution: Legal Name of Property Owner(s): J mA n 'F- Alp ,,, 4 C u i T. A ! Mailing Address: 3q A)u XSA" B I vas • 4 Q 1dCl? C'1N`1 ' 15-:3 0 Phone Number: Cl - !?3 0 - 9.7 6 7 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- Property Location: of a SS'ry Ao 1 n T d 0 C✓t c o y u c (If necessary, provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT(If applicable): -':5- FFet H �a-f-a ► a Mailing Address: P-D • e o x 5$a- w� a 1�ern a N Y Phone Number: 6,-31 • Lt g �l '9 3 3 a,- L �` p��i C"I1 Board of Trustees ApplOt;ion GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 3f, 31D Area Zoning: s Previous use of property: s Intended use of property: ae s Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes ✓ No - If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes ✓ No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept.prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes ✓ No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes ✓ No / Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? '✓ Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revolted or suspended by a governmental agency? f No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): v•F �X( 5-t1ny �t 41 /,t 57a me l®Ga-Hoar �3 �cc g�'i rig w� FCS 'Vel, vt vcl L Je 4�1 Hoard of Trustees Appl tion WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Q«u%Ae- e--,,,Q r e P l a e e e-o L 44w //1 S u M{ l e c w,t—I c.—j G. S {'?« Area of wetlands on lot: ® square feet Percent coverage of lot: D % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 2 0 on feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: zoo® feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? `� No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? r JA cubic yards How much material will be filled? vi A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: N _feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ° Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: "/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): T r will i6e- 1,o er-�c* or, tra-Nt,a1QS Short Environmental Assessment.Form Part d d Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: 8145 Nassau Point Road-Cutchogue Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): See location Map Brief Description of Proposed Action: Remove and replace existing 60 if jetty in same Iocaton as exiting with new vinyl sheeting Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516.330-2707 John F.Aloia&Elvira T.Alois E-Mail: madadavani@msn.com Address: 39 Nassau Blvd City/PO: State: Zip Code: Garden City NY 11530 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that G4 El may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ F77NYSDEC/NYSDOS I Town of Southold Trustees 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.891 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.01 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? "0.891 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban []Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial mResidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Pagel of 3 1 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ W1 1 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify;Name:Peconic Bay and Environs,Reason:Protect public health,water,vegetation,i£scenic beauty, ❑ a gency: o oun y, a e: - 2-118 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑✓ ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 0 ❑ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 7 ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? a ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ a 13.a.Does any.portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? 0 b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Go Lf of existing IP-flY 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: QJ Shoreline [3 Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban m Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? Least Tem,Piping Plover ❑ 21 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ ❑ a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO AYES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: NO YES Page 2 of 3 J( 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO I YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 7 ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: Q 7 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: a ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor ria e: John F.Aloia Date: Signature: PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 rn. 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES --completed)for hazardous-waste? -If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur I. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning r�j ❑ regulations? u 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the 0 1:1establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage ❑ problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. F] Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental i acts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees � Name of Lead Agency Date Michael J ®ominA President Print or ype Na of Responsi44v Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of ResportibfjOfficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 i EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, May 15,2018 8:38 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool Intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form(EAF),Not all questions asked In the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to i DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a ri substitute for agency determinations. ^Jc t i Otl<WI3 Mon`tfcal 1 1 Toronto + it ,;! ;o a ton Pic Sources,;EsrI,HERE:,Garcnin„USGS, '`Ctevcsrnd _ ' { . , �Providenca &termap,INCREMENTR i40dan„Esrl: �_ t r�Jepan,605:&"l61iina,1Hon®1Congj;,Esri` -,;I rhapi, ;Sowa�S”"Esrl, E,Garm in, <crea:Esdi„Tfiaileriii),tlGCC,;� Columbua' USGIStllntb2r'r1p,INCREMENT �CFenStreeilJiepntribtrtars,and the GIs Is .'', _- ' 1 P,,'NRCan,Es rtJapen,,futETl, Us'g Community, clnnatu ;l ., Ef��er"�CF,ins{}{cng Kcngy,,Esri Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental Yes Area] Part 1 /Question 7[Critical Environmental Name:Peconic Bay and Environs, Reason:Protect public health,water, Area-Identify] vegetation, &scenic beauty,Agency:Suffolk County, Date:7-12-88 Part 1 /Question 12a [National Register of No Historic Places] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15[Threatened or Yes Endangered Animal] Part 11 Question 15[Threatened or Least Tern, Piping Plover Endangered Animal-Name] Part 1 /Question 16[100 Year Flood Plain] Yes Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 I Board of Trustees Application AFFIDAVIT �o 4:�" A 1 o i a Zvi,rw 7- A)of'&. BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL.INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. 4"'t� Signature f Property Owner Signature of Property Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF ,20j\ ary-Public CAROLYN T MAIER Notary Public-State oS New York 51 t�1 1� NO:Ol 1VIA60 i 3696 11 Qualified in Nassau County My Commission Expires 2`j L2- Beard of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/We, 0k1-j _A4n ia, 6 VIYGt /'o"Lbl a y owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- �— —� in the town of C l.V _ _ ,New York,hereby authorizes —DR L)i2" L �( to act as my aghnt and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s) from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. 1 A ProperqOwner's Signature Property Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF `v 1�i� _ , 2017 r ary Public ENotaryPubRc AROLYN T MAZER W -State of New York .01 MA6073696 ed In Nassau C unrysion Expires 2- 22- Board of Trusstoon Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) I/Vic, — J-v1, 1✓- AID: (Winer:;of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- I ' `I '`? in the town of New York,hereby authorizes T lW e c'l Qw te,^ to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. Prop Owner's Signature Propert Owner's Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 20 N _ oWy Public =TF,%ER/lY TT F,%ER-S Cle 0,Now York,4. tA607�6965 ON=sou Counr,/fitxpires Scanned with CamScanner Board of Trusteee Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the applicant is not the owner) i vwe, �� r� Ella t ; owners of the property identified as SCTM# 1000- l� Q Z in the town of � .New York,hereby authorizes y r. ^, to act as my agent and handle all - necessary work involved with the application process for permit(s)from the Southold Town Board of Trustees for this property. . P Owner's Signatuie Y Property Owner's Signature 7 DAY OF �L'—C 20 SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS. .__ �f,:,'z 1't+bt{c•Sloe:of kew Yaic X11/". •.��"'' -� 'ky��,�,'�tt(inl+���a�ao�3y69�� "Ch • _ ;^\ :,,; "s" �"<:"'�, moi,.- ,r ,- n, " - . ��\ r�'`+� :.i w -'>l:a�, 'l',.% ''C'.N`�."r�Ea.'.•i„^�w .;.:.:=v Poa,' ..s. ` - ! t :'.i :.�"_. 1,t� 'r` .ty`t.,j "~-' ^�.s .\C>' ) � _ :a-•"'ra;:' .1�`��� :4:,`• , . .rR2;;=�ky,y:,1'di..:�'m�,r i u.r;yu-�.yi;;.4'sY .Y.3-�:t�:C,`.{t�:'.i•ate-'Y;r :•b+.>>.,�. _ "�'"3,za,'... - �?w ` 7•,,.;�<;:=d r_"yti°i >'„,f'w3:iy'.y ..,„ ;i�.'..'.>�;.. .f;��,.:z:" ;'f.`y 3 _y.:.` _t`F-vr'�r:;,� ;,,r„.`^.i t: • , ''�.'jT�i.rY`7s..t i`!°'Sn n`8+�i�i`S-1TSy•S'1`•.•!nr`q;r*�','s.?1..h�.�.xL °`^.P:i>rgj:3,Y s). _ •J:Y.:(;:�, t'1:: . �:g`\�? '�w''rt:'};'�?t,•e..s}'�` -'s�'� ��� .�;;-j�'��t-h.*e:��.=moi•^.., �'yc,,';a";'-w`F;:>•';.,,r'::''R«.s:"�.' ^.�*•;"' � . i a.`.L jY`r:<, "„�..?,eL= ..H 5':, ���±sp�.�.'�: .L...`�• ••.`>>Y' :, r':.�.;, '>.C n' )e;.;`+ 'a �' '.•i:��Y?s � � .•ra7 �. �..:a+. 3„�s,. - ;;y�r..': �!+'_„ ,3;•�<".' �;i,s. '2(:r`�';'�':i'<:r-a a'''rm ."i s 'st '�3.a•a T.':g'c„�,+ �� {e:•S�°,5��ii- �: •'fes':'".`�a;`.:.ti••-'° 3: s§.. • i "f h:,\,�,f''<••.v.. `�';`Ja y�rys,'1•�y YµN^.�" 't,�`a \ Scanned with CamScanner i APPLICANUAGENUREPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURI�FORM The Town of Somhold's Code of 13thim rohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emnioveeyfc numose of Ihis form-is lo provide`n`'orination which can nlert the town of nossible conflicts of fttterest and allow it to take whatever acl ion is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: A 1 ° t &. (Last name,first name,ipiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee —� Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map _ Planning Other (If"Other',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,ntarringe,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a purinership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partinl ownership of(or employment by)a corponriion in which the town ollicer or employee owns more than 5%ofllhares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicandagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%orthe shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or benelicinf owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when ilia applicant is not a corpomtlon); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this _day'af20 Signature b° Print Name lo,-A ____ Form TS 1 C OLYN_T MAIER ldotarY Public-State of New York / NO.CIMA6073696 Qualified In Nassau County MYCornrnlssionExpires S! Z 2a APPI.,ICANTYA(sENUREPR+SEN'I'ATIn TRANS,A,CTIONAL DISCLOSUU POR The Town of Soutita Ts Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part f town officers and ernplaym Tlie nurnosc of this form is to nrovi(le information which can nlertille town of 1)o_ss(ble conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is peeecsary to avoid same. YOURNAME: ` A 1 , ; ;0— , (Last name,first naine,*ddle initial,uNess you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.if so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building �_ Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map _ Planning Other (If"Other',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parant,or child)haven relationship with ally officer or employee of the"town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business biterest."Business interest"means a busincsey including apartnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which ilia town offlOCr or employee owns more than 5%ofihe hares. YES _ NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of perspn employed by the Town of Southold Title br position of that person Describe ilia relationship between yourself(the appliciiiit/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%ofihe shnivs of the corporate stock of tite appliclint (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal orbeneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(whim ilia applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Subtnftted this day of t"'lA 20� Signature_ Print Name_ el vtr_,L=, I- bi'�_ Form TS 1 E AROL*T'MAIER ublic-,State.of New York O.OlMAbOi3696ied in Nassau County'ssion Expires A PPLIC.NT/A.CENT/RF,PRESENTATIV TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOWU FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethicsrp ohihits conflicts of interest on the part of Town W11ccrs and employees.'Ilie ournosc o this form kin provide inforination which can nlerdhe town of rnossible confliels of Interest and allow it to talce whatever action is nece,wry to avoid Same, YOUR NAME: ?a ka A l v - " (Last name,first name,.rpiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map _ Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or amployce of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or biwincss interest."Business interest"mans a business, including a.partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%ofthe shares. YES _ NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of perspn employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe tttc relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space prodided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%ofthe shares of the corporate stock ofthe applic@nt (when the applicant is corporation); B)the legal orbeneCicial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corpomtion); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this I!r day of Zp It S ignature_ �— Print Name_ J ref k�u�►� _ Form TS 1 r Posta ° • GERTO . IECEI . CERTIFIED , O . s Ln I! - 0 7N Ie - O 0r WOrr-171tv M- oQ' � � � > m 114 . � ,'.. Q.. ity I a 1i,"r131' ��t ,„,�I �.2 ia'- €k`;•� ra -t'i �ra ��� Q' N Certified Mad Fee $3.45 01716 N Certified Mad Fee-$3.45 1 I' s, _t C 4 �' o Q' Extra Services&Fees(check box,edd tee& ro ate) ti 1 7 I Extra,Services&Fees(check box,add fee pr� ) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ T)-°) _ 6, O ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ -° , 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ PSS ark 'r O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ I Postma Q ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Her J ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ O Her p 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Required $ - O ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ / ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage C� p Postage to $�I°cilf �'� Q u1 $ $1-1°5ll rte-- Total Postage and' ;1 - )�%I ` } - -— Total Postage and$�°711 03/03/-2018 -- -- $6°Iia g SCTM#100 - 0 1,- $ent To SCTM#1000-118-5-4.3 r� Sent To -------- o s�ieeiandAPr:N j Sturdy, R H Mango,Vincent& Mango, Carol C3 Sweet andApi No.; r_ 1 10 Bellows Lane 270 Jerusalem Rd. cry,"sraie;Z/P+41 Manhasset, NY 11030 clry;siaie;ziP+a� Cohasset, MA 02025 TUZ ' e4�0 ® • ® © O 1 .TIF IEMAILT� , Db40 • r 1 cc I I - r= v m rT. Cr Certified Mad Fee * f1 6 p^ Certified Mad Fee $3.45 1171 tP Q' $ e nr 14 5 � Extra Services&Fees(check bax;add fee �p a !1 Extra SBNIC2S&Fees(checkbox,add fee s'd t ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 1 1 � N ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 11 '�.� I I-3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �.� Post ar ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �j Postma (\� O 1-3 ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery $ -- Here �! ❑Certdied Matl Restricted Delivery $ H e E:3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ A 0 E]Adult Signature Required $[]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �' []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ r �Q Postage O Postage C3 $0.50Ln $iI°5iI � Total Postage and --U87 1131bi�1-8 Total Postage ani '- $ $6°70 1 '� �, $6.70 SCTM#1000-118-5-4.1 SCTM#1000-118-4-8 Corazzini, Richard W Jr& (\- Sent To Iti Sent To ,-a Fry,James D. SfieefandApENc Corazzini, Cheryl A C3 sieeiaadApi No: g pebble Hill Drive � _ r' 8500 Nassau Point Road Cary State;ZIP+4� City$tate;ZIP+4' Northport, NY 11768 Cutchogue, NY 11935 j ”' J PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Q..� y ..I'I� :• , .' ='yet.:. ..'tt' 1 — — •',t 5„, ..?' Wet. STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK _ :1 residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 2CL_, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 I Notary Public i August 6, 2018 Town of Southold Trustees Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Rte. 25 P.O. Box 1179 C ` Southold, New York 11971 RE: 8145 NASSAU POINT RD-CUTCHOGUE AUG , 0 2018 SCTM No. 1000-118-04-09 AFFIDAVITS Southold Town a of Trustees Dear Trustees: Attached please find Affidavits of Mailing and Posting as required for public hearing. If you should have any questions or require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-484-9332. Very truly yours, J rey Patanjo P.O. Box 582 Bohemia, NY 11716 •_ IZ Michael J. Domino,President p�pSVFFO L � Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer II1,Vice-President �� 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith y z P.O.Box 1179 A.Nicholas Krupski ® Southold,NY 11971 Greg Williams Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of JOHN &ELVIRA ALOIA COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR A T LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE I, Jeffrey Patanjo ,residing at/dba PO Box, 582,Bohemia,NY 11716 being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 67—day of August , 2018 , I personally posted the property known-as 8145 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue,NY SCTM# 1000-118-04-09 by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, August 15,2018. Dated: i i h'? (si i ure) Sworn to before me this 6 day of Aug. 2018 &ALC MARILYN S. HICKS Notary P NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No.01 H1636MB9 ouarnied in Suffolk County Commission Expires October 10,2021 i PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: SCTM#1000-118-4-8 SCTM#1000-118-5-4.3 ` Fry,James D. Sturdy, R H 8 Pebble Hill Drive 270 Jerusalem Rd. Northport, NY 11768 Cohasset, MA 02025 SCTM#1000-118-5-4.1 SCTM#1000-118-4-10 Corazzini, Richard W Jr& Mango,Vincent& Mango,Carol Corazzini, Cheryl A 10 Bellows Lane 8500 Nassau Point Road Manhasset, NY 11030 Cutchogue, NY 11935 STATE•OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK :Jeffrey Patanjo ,residing at P.O. Box 582,Bohemia,NY 11716 being duly sworn,deposes and says that on the 3 day of-August ,20 18 ,deponent mailed a•true copy of the Notice , set forth in the Board of Trustees Application,directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at t >9 ktexN a.,^ - .that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this_ 3 Day of August , 20 18 MARILYN S. HICKS NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No.01 HI6365489 N tary Pub lc Qualified in Suffolk County t Commission Expires October,10,2021 NUTILL Ui - HtA 'RING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: JOHN & ELVIRA ALOIA 4 SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING : For a Wetland Permit to remove and replace 60 linear feet of existing jetty in same location as existing with new vinyl jetty. Located: 8145 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-118-4-9 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : Wednesday, August 15, 2018 — at or about 5 :30P. M . If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCE'ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies,'shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(whicli includes all of Southold Town). 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be ex;plainW in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1II - Li }PROJECT NAME 8/'� S The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): �/ Town Board F1Planning]Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees E� 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Remo.,c. Aa&P dejeloeC bo LT eF JefL1 /✓t S.aNt� Zeo6'-1P-j AS Ox Sfiek av(44t w vc,V L& JcJ p Location of action: Fl y,- Na S S'&C_' Porti+ X4 C�t�It O 4 W e Site acreage: o 91 Present land use: fL S Present zoning classification: IZe S 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: J c 4 A F • A I o. A0 e_ (b) Mailing address: 11 N f-SSA c, r,0*.t C(4-,, ,,, q lls3o (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) 5"I b - 3 3 a - ;t 7 0 7 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes IF'7r% No❑ If yes, which state or federal agency? C r, s ooS C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. bDEVELOPEID COAST POLICY Policy Y. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,-makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ErYes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Pro r� } Pyr-+Lee•(-S a5asn-64- cast df- S -R-i& x1001 lInc ani at�owS Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable J Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the 'Town of Southold. See LN 1W Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria FYes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Proj rc 4 Prof'-tc -i-5 --?[i Szi bea�� at ree` Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources.from flooding and erosion. See LW11k Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑, No ❑ Not Applicable Pr®I e c-1 pio r►,o-G e, e'..j 6e ..c.k .1 J w. n t7 g S Lt a re.. ..t L Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the 'Town of.Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ 'Y'es 1:1 No [Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the 'Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section IYI--Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. F1 ❑ L=1 Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary i Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [—] No[� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. ,See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. 11 Yes ❑ No D Mot Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. �n YeO No❑ Not Applicable IF _ f n l<c-{- n.1�ow S �i� S a n r3- cQC,�o t i-t'to..� o�,�o n y 6.�C�C.�C u�S tt�+•u b<Ac� Attach additional sheets if necessary i � { WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section I1I—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No EJ-Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LMW Section III —Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluationcriteria. ❑ Yes 1:1ev No�Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LVVRIP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No EINot Applicable PREPARED BY J G fi i o TITLE A -4- DATE r-/s7- ',? sl May 29,, 2018 Town of Southold Trustees ® � Town Hall Annex Building _22 54375 Rte. 25 P.O. Box 1179 JAN — 1 201 , Southold, New York 11971 RE: 8145 NASSAU POINT ROAD-CUTCHOGUE nautnoaW f Tatu� fru SCTM'No. 1000-118-4-9 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Dear Trustees: We hereby submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of the proposed plans, application and check for permit approval for the above referenced project. If you should have any questions or require anything further, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-484-9332. Ve truly yours, Jeffrey Patanjo P.O. Box 582 Bohemia, NY 11716