HomeMy WebLinkAboutNPV Ecological Review 8/2018 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS3, LLC,
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTING
w w w .nelsonpopevoor his.com
ECOLOGICAL REVIEW
Vineyard View, Southold
Suffolk County,New York
August 30, 2018
Prepared By: Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC
572 Walt Whitman Road
Melville,New York 11747
Contact: Charles Voorhis, CEP, AICP
(631)427-5665
For Submission to: Allen Handelman, Vice President
Conifer Realty
1000 University Avenue, Suite 500
Rochester NB+Y 14607
(585)324-0512
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Nelson,Pope&Voorhis (NP&V)has been retained by the property owners, Conifer Realty, LLC,
to conduct an investigation of habitats, on the Vineyard View property situated on the south side
of North Country Road (CR 48) approximately 1,515 feet east of the intersection of Chapel Lane
and North Country Road, Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York. The subject site is more
particularly described on the Suffolk County Tax Map(SCTM)as District 1000, Section 40,Block
3. The site consists of 17.2 acres of naturally vegetated lands.
Field work to identify habitat on-site was conducted by an environmental scientist on June 29,
2018. A summary of the field work and findings of this investigation is provided herein.
2.0 VEGETATION
The property is predominately vegetated, and freshwater wetlands are located within the south,
east and west portions of the site. A field inspection was conducted by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis
staff on June 29, 2018 to catalog the species on-site and determine what habitat types occur on-
site. Special care was taken to identify species that occur within the freshwater wetland buffer
area as well as the on-site wetlands located around the south, east and west perimeters of the site.
Species noted on -site include:
Table 1
Species Identified On-site
Scientific Name Common Name
Herbaceous Species
Jack-in-the-pulpit Arisaema tri h llum
Pennsylvania sedge Carex ens lvanica
CORPORATE OFFICE HUDSON VALLEY OFFICE
572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, M ELVILLE, NY 11747-2188 156 Route 59,Suite C6,SUFFERN, NY 10901
PHONE:(631)427-5665 • FAx:(631)427-5620 PHONE:(845)368-1472 • FAx:(845)368-1572
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Canada mayflower Maianthemum canadense
sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis
multiflora rose Rosa multiflora
skunk cabbage S m locar us oetidus
ferns .
Trees
Norway maple Acer platanoides
red maple Acer rubrum
hickory species Carya s .
American beech Fa us grandifolia
black cherry Prunus serotina
white oak Quercus alba
sassafras Sassa ras albidum
A review of historical aerial imagery, included as Enclosure A, show that the entirety of the
Project Site was previously cleared prior to 1962. Imagery from 2001 indicates a central portion
of the site remained cleared in to 2001 and has since been left to natural succession. Due to
previous clearing activities the habitats on site are largely successional and no mature forest is
present.
3.0 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES
The New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP)was contacted to determine if any
significant ecological communities have been documented on or in the vicinity of the Project
Site. Correspondence with NYNHP is included as Enclosure B. While there are no regulatory
protections limiting the development of these communities they are considered significant from a
statewide perspective.NYNHP reports that Coastal Oak-Hickory Forest and Red Maple- Swamp
White Oak Swamp are within the vicinity of the project site.
Coastal Oak-Hickory Forest is described by Edinger(2014)1 as "a hardwood forest with oaks
(Quercus spp) and hickories (Carya spp.)codominant that occurs in dry, well-drained, loamy sand of
knolls, upper slopes, or south facing slopes of glacial moraines of the coastal plain. The forest is usually
codominated by two or more species of oaks, usually white oak(Q. alba), black oak(Quercus velutina)
and chestnut oak(Q. montana). Scarlet oak(Quercus coccinea) is also a common associate.Mixed with
the oaks are one or more of the following hickories:pignut(Carya glabra), mockernut(C. alba), and
sweet pignut(C. ovalis). These hickories can range from nearly pure stands to as little as about 25%
cover. There is typically a subcanopy stratum of small trees and tall shrubs including flowering dogwood
(Cornus florida)and highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). The shrub layer and groundlayer
flora may be diverse. Common low shrubs include maple-leaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), lowbush
blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium, V.pallidum) and black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata).
Characteristic groundlayer herbs are Swan's sedge (Carex swanii),panic grass (Panicum dichotomum),
poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), cow-wheat(Melampyrum lineare), spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila
maculata), rattlesnake weed(Hieracium venosum), white wood aster(Eurybia divaricata),false
Solomon's seal(Maianthemum racemosum), Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica), and silver-rod
(Solidago bicolor). Other herbs include Solomon's-seal(Polygonatum biflorum)and Canada mayflower
(Maianthemum canadense) (David Kuntsler pens. comm)"
1 Edinger,G.J.,D.J.Evans, S. Gebauer,T.G.Howard,D.M.Hunt,and A.M.Olivero(editors).2014.Ecological
Communities of New York State. Second Edition.A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological
Communities of New York State.New York Natural Heritage Program,New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation,Albany,NY.
Ai34- Page 2 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
A high-quality occurrence of the uncommon community type Coastal Oak-Hickory Forest occurs
near the project site. Reports by the NYNHP indicate that the community type may extend onto
the southeastern corner of the project site but is not within the proposed construction area.
Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp has been documented with 0.3 miles southwest of the
project site. This habitat type is described by Edinger(2014 as "a hardwood swamp typically found
in small, isolated basins on sandy soils that are underlain by a clay layer. The swamp floods seasonally
and draws down in most years exposing a leaf litter substrate. The swamp is codominated by red maple
(Acer rubrum)and oaks, such as swamp white oak(Quercus bicolor)and/or pin oak(Q.palustris).
Typically, swamp white oak is either dominant or codominant with red maple along with several other
canopy trees with lower abundance, such as blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), swamp cottonwood(Populus heterophylla), and elms (Ulmus americana, U. rubra). Pin
oak can be an associate canopy tree or replace swamp white oak as the codominant. Trees from the
surrounding uplands can occur in low abundance within the swamp on drier hummocks, such as pignut
hickory (Caryaglabra) andAmerican beech (Fagus grandifolia). Characteristic shrubs include
winterberry (Ilex verticillata), highbush blueberry(Vaccinium corymbosum), buttonbush (Cephalanthus
occidentalis), and arrowwood(Viburnum dentatum). Associated shrubs with low abundance include
sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)and spicebush (Lindera benzoin). Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora)
is an invasive shrub in some examples. Characteristic vines with low abundance include poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), greenbrier(Smilax rotundifolia), and wild grapes (Vitis spp.). Herb cover is
typically sparse. Characteristic herbs include various sedges (Carex spp), such as C. crinita C. grayi C.
lupulina, and C. tuckermanii. Other characteristic herbs include ferns, such as cinnamon fern (Osmunda
cinnamomea), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), netted chain fern
(Woodwardia areolata).Associated herbs with low abundance include lady fern (Athyrium filix femina),
sweet woodreed(Cinna arundinacea), spinulose wood fern (Dryopteris carthusiana), soft rush (Juncus
effusus), marsh seedbox (Ludwigia palustris), northern bugleweed(Lycopus un florus), and blunt-leaved
sandwort(Moehringia lateriflora). The unvegetated layer is dominated by leaf litter that typically covers
about three-quarters of the swamp basin. Swamp white oak dominated or codominated swamps on
hilltops, or on steps in slopes, over bedrock rather than sandy soil are classified as perched swamp white
oak swamps.The unvegetated layer is dominated by leaf litter that typically covers about three-quarters of
the swamp basin."
Red Maple-Swamp White Oak was not observed on-site and all wetlands found on site are
consistent with a Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp classification. However, as the proposed project
will occur in upland portions of the site there are no anticipated impacts to a Red Maple- Swamp
White Oak community that may occur on -site.
3.0 STATE LISTED RARE,THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
The NYNHP was contacted to determine if any rare, threatened or endangered species have been
found on or in the vicinity of the Project Site. While NYNHP includes all records for species
with a conservation status of vulnerable or imperiled, this report addresses only the species that
are listed as "Threatened" or"Endangered"within the State of New York. For the Project Site,
NYNHP returned the following records from their database:
Page 3 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Table 2
State Listed Species
Scientific Name Common Name NY State Listing
Plants
white-edged sedge Carex debilis var. debilis Threatened
swamp smartweed Persicaria setacea Endangered
cranefly orchid Tipularia discolor Endangered
seaside a alinis A alinis maritima var. maritima Threatened
swamp cottonwood Po ulus heterophylla Threatened
annual saltmarsh aster S m h otrichum subulatum var. subulatum Threatened
sea pink Sabatia stellaris Threatened
cat-tail sedge Carex typhina Endangered
dwarf glasswort Salicornis bi elovii Threatened
smooth tick trefoil Desmodium laevi atum Endangered
Animals
Northern cricket frog Acris cre itans Endangered
A full discussion of each of the listed species and potential association with the site is provided
below.
White-edged Sedge (Carex debilis var. debilis)
NYNHP reports that white-edged sedge has been documented within 25-100 yards south of and
0.35 miles east of the Project Site within red maple hardwood swamps. While no white-edged
sedge was identified on site,potential habitat for the species is located on-site.
As no development is proposed within the on-site red maple hardwood swamp, the proposed
project will have no anticipated impacts on white-edged sedge.
Swamp Smartweed(Persicaria setacea)
NYNHP reports that swamp smartweed has been documented 220 yards east of the Project Site
within an excavated ditch. An obligate wetland species, this plant can be found in a variety of
wetlands including pond shores, marshes, ditches and stream corridors in red maple swamps2
While no swamp smartweed was identified on site, potential habitat for the species is located on-
site.
As no development is proposed within the on-site red maple hardwood swamp, the proposed
project will have no anticipated impacts on swamp smartweed.
Cranefly Orchid(Tipularia discolor)
NYNHP reports that cranefly orchid has been documented 0.25 miles of the Project Site.
NYNHP reports that typically, this species is located within rich woods dominated by any
combination of maple, beech and oak. One small, 50-100 plant, population persists within the
state3.
2 https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9231&part=2
s https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9712
A"--
Page 4 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Potential habitat for the cranefly orchid is present on-site; however,no cranefly orchids were
observed on-site during the site visit conducted on June 29, 2018.
Seaside A alg iasis (Agalinis maritima var. maritima)
Seaside agalinis has been documented within 0.3 miles of the Project Site along the edges of a
coastal salt marsh. This species is typically found along the upland edges of high marsh areas or
within low or brackish tidal marshes'.
The subject property is located more than ±500 feet from the Long Island Sound and
approximately 3,500 feet from the Great Peconic Bay. The inland and vegetated nature of the
subject property and its location more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline make this site
unsuitable for the species. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the seaside agalinis.
Swamp Cottonwood (Populus heterophylla)
NYNHP reports that swamp cottonwood has been documented within a forested wetland
approximately 0.35 miles southwest of the Project Site. An obligate wetland species, when
present, this species typically occurs in stands within red maple hardwood swamps.
No swamp cottonwood was identified during the site visit on June 29, 2018. As no development
is proposed within the on-site red maple hardwood swamp, the proposed project will have no
anticipated impacts on swamp cottonwood.
Annual Saltmarsh Aster (Symphyotrichum subulatum var. subulatum)
Annual saltmarsh aster has been documented within 0.5 miles of the Project Site within a high
salt marsh. This obligate wetland species is typically found within saltwater and brackish tidal
marshes along the coastline.
The subject property is located more than±500 feet from the Long Island Sound and
approximately 3,500 feet from the Great Peconic Bay. The inland and vegetated nature of the
subject property and its location more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline make this site
unsuitable for the species. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the annual saltmarsh
aster.
Sea Pink (Sabatia stellaris)
Sea pink has been documented within 0.5 miles of the Project Site within a high salt marsh and
perimeter of the marsh. This facultative wetland species is typically found within high
saltmarshes along coastlines.
The subject property is located more than±500 feet from the Long Island Sound and
approximately 3,500 feet from the Great Peconic Bay. The inland and vegetated nature of the
subject property and its location more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline make this site
unsuitable for the species. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the sea pink.
4 https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9352&part=2
5 https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9097&part=2
A"--
Page 5 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Cat-tail Sedge (Carex 0yphina)
NYNHP reports that cat-tail sedge has been documented 0.50 miles east of the Project Site. This
obligate wetland species has been found within hardwood swamps, and moist woods along the
edge of dense herbaceous vegetation. While no cat-tail sedge was identified on site,potential
habitat for the species is located on-site.
As no development is proposed within the on-site red maple hardwood swamp, the proposed
project will have no anticipated impacts on cat-tail sedge.
Dwarf Glasswort (Salicornia bi l ovii)
Dwarf glasswort has been documented within 0.35 miles of the Project Site within a salt marsh.
This obligate species is typically found within maritime wetlands.
The subject property is located more than±500 feet from the Long Island Sound and
approximately 3,500 feet from the Great Peconic Bay. The inland and vegetated nature of the
subject property and its location more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline make this site
unsuitable for the species. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the dwarf glasswort.
Smooth tick trefoil (Desmodium laevipatum)
NYNHP reports that smooth tick trefoil has been historically documented within Greenport. This
species is typically found within dry, sandy woods and clearings. One small, 50-100 plant,
population persists within the state'.
Potential habitat for the smooth tick trefoil is present on-site; however, no individuals of this
species were observed on-site during the site visit conducted on June 29, 2018.
Northern Cricket Frog,(Acris cMpitans)
NYNHP reports that a historical record for the Northern cricket frog dating back to May 9, 1929
exists. No specific locational information for the record is available and no more recent records
for the species within the vicinity of the Project Site have been reported. Per NYNHP, this
species is a habitat specialist and inhabits the edges of marshes, ponds, impoundments. The
species has been extirpated from Long Island$.
As no development is proposed within the on-site wetlands and the species has been previously
extirpated from Long Island, the proposed project will have no anticipated impact on the
northern cricket frog.
4.0 United States Fish and Wildlife Threatened and Endangered Species
A list for potential species on and/or in proximity to the subject site was generated using United
States Fish &Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation online
'https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9712
Locally extinct
s https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=6706
a"-- Page 6 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
project review and is included as Enclosure C. Six (6) species were identified on the USFWS
Official Species List as potentially present on the site and/or in the area and are listed in Table 3.
Table 3
Species List
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Listing
Northern long-eared bat M otis se tentionalis Threatened
piping plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
red knot Calidris canutus ru a Threatened
roseate tern Sterna do u alli dou allii Endangered
sand lain gerardia A alinis acuta Endangered
seabeach amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
Critical habitat is designated in the area for the piping plover; however, the subject property is
located outside of this designated area. No critical habitat has been designated for the other five
(5) identified species. A full discussion of each of the listed species and potential association
with the site is provided below.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentionalis)
The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed both federally and within the State of New York as
a Threatened species. The NLEB is primarily dependent upon forested habitats during the
summer months and hibernate through the late fall and early spring. Hibernacula9 primarily
consists of abandoned mines and caves. Per the NYSDEC occurrence map, there are no
confirmed winter occurrences of this species on Long Island; summer occurrences have been
documented in several locations in the Town of Brookhaven which is west of the Town of
Southold where the property is located (See Enclosure Q.
The USFWS states that potentially suitable roost habitat for NLEB may include live trees and/or
snags with a Diameter Breast Height (DBH) greater than or equal to 3 inches. Suitable roost
tress will have cavities, crevices, exfoliating bark, and/or cracks, and individual trees are within
1,000 feet (305 m) of forested habitat. Trees that receive sunlight during the day, typically found
in the supra-canopy and along the edge of a patch,have a higher potential to provide suitable
roost sites than trees located towards the interior of the forest.
Potential NLEB habitat is located on site,however, no confirmed occurrences of NLEB occur
within the vicinity of the subject property were reported by NYNHP. Furthermore, should it be
determined that NLEB utilize the area for summer roosting, clearing may be limited to
November lst thru March 31St to prevent any impacts to the species.
Piping Plover(Charadrius melodus)
The piping plover is listed federally as a Threatened species and within the State of New York as
an Endangered species. This small shorebird breeds on dry, sandy beaches often with little
9 The location in which a species/individual seeks refuge during hibernation.
9�14_ Page 7 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
nearby vegetation. A migratory bird, this species typically winters along the coast from North
Carolina as far south as the Bahamas.
The subject property is located more than±500 feet from the Long Island Sound and
approximately 3,500 feet from the Great Peconic Bay. The inland and vegetated nature of the
subject property and its location more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline make this site
unsuitable for the species. As such, there are no anticipated impacts to the piping plover.
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)
The red knot is federally listed as a Threatened species. A medium sized shorebird, this species
nests in tundra areas north of the arctic circle in the summer and winters along shorelines from
southern Canada to South America. This species migrates and winters in large flocks comprised
of hundreds of birds. Primarily a shorebird, this species feeds on marine invertebrates, and
during breeding, terrestrial invertebrates.
The vegetated, inland nature of the subject property and its location more than 500 from the
nearest shoreline (Long Island Sound)make this site unsuitable for the species. As such, there
are no anticipated impacts to the red knot.
Roseate Tern (Sterna dou�allii dougallii)
The roseate tern is federally listed as an Endangered Species. Like similar tern species, the
roseate tern is a marine coastal species and is found along the Atlantic coastline. This species
often nests in large colonies and can be found mixed in with other tern species such as the
Common Tern. Breeding sites are typically located on rocky offshore islands or depressions in
sandy or gravelly areas. In New York the breeding population typically arrives to the breeding
grounds in late April or early May and departs in late summerlo
Per the NYSDEC,New York populations of the roseate tern occur on within a few established
colonies, the largest of which is located off the eastern end of Long Island 2. As the subject
property is located more than 500 feet from the nearest shoreline (Long Island Sound) and
consists of vegetated upland and freshwater wetlands there are no anticipated impacts to the
roseate tern.
Sandplain Gerardia(Agalinis acuta)
Sandplain gerardia is the only federally listed Endangered plant species found within the State of
New York. NYNHP reports that there are four known occurrences of this species throughout
Long Island". Most notable populations exist with the remnant Hempstead Plains and within
remnant grasslands in the Pine Barrens. This species prefers disturbed sites and across its
traditional range such conditions were maintained through grazing and fire. The succession of
grasslands and fields is a common threat to its persistence. Other threats pushing this species
towards extirpation include invasive species and loss of habitat.
'o http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7084.html
"https://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=9350
A"--
Page 8 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
While a review of historical aerial photos indicates that a portion of the property was previously
cleared thus opening up the area to potential grassland species, over the years the area has been
left to naturally succeed. As such, the canopy has closed in and the area is consistent with a
successional forest cover type. Potential habitat for sandplain gerardia is no longer found on the
subject site. Furthermore, no sandplain gerardia was found on the property during a site visit
conducted by NP&V staff on June 29, 2018. As discussed in Section 3.0,NYNHP was
contacted to determine if any rare, threatened or endangered species are found on or within the
vicinity of the subject property. NYNHP has no records of sandplain gerardia, occurring on or
within the vicinity of the subject property (See Enclosure B). As the species was not detected
there are no anticipated impacts to Sandplain Gerardia.
Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus)
Seabeach amaranth is listed both federally and by New York State as a Threatened species. This
coastal plant typically occurs on barrier islands with limited disturbance. There are nine
populations known to occur across Long island and searches of barrier beaches have not located
additional populations 12. When found, this plant usually occurs between the seaward most dune
and the high-water line.
The habitat associated with this species is not found within the subject property as the project is
not located on a barrier beach. As the required habitat type for this species is not present on the
Project Site there are no anticipated impacts to seabeach amaranth.
5.0 CONCLUSION
In reviewing the results of the site investigation, there are no potential impacts to Red Maple-
Swamp White Oak community or Coastal Oak-Hickory community that may occur on or in the
vicinity of the Project Site. It was also concluded that of the 11 threatened or endangered species
reported by the NYNHP, there is no suitable habitat on-site for four (4) of the species. Of the
remaining six (6) species, five (5) are freshwater wetland species. Although suitable freshwater
wetland habitat occurs on-site, the proposed project includes no development within the wetland.
Therefore, there are no anticipated impacts to these species. While potential habitat for the two
(2) remaining species identified by NYNHP, may be present neither the crane fly orchid nor the
smooth tick trefoil were found on-site during the site visit conducted on June 29, 2018.
Based on analysis of the habitat types present within the subject property, the proposed
development of this site is not expected to cause impacts to the Northern long-eared bat, piping
plover,red knot, roseate tern, sandplain gerardia and seabeach amaranth. Of these species,
suitable habitat for the piping plover, red knot, roseate tern and seabeach amaranth does not
occur on the Project Site. Potential habitat may occur on site for Northern Long eared Bat and
sandplain gerardia, however NYNHP does not have any records of either species on or within the
vicinity of the Project Site. As the proposed project is not receiving any federal funding, no
further consultation with USFWS is required.
12 http://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=8699
A
Page 9 of 11
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Enclosure A
ft PATI
• . • U f0
•7 � W C
le
ip
. y *' •• '
T /
. ., . y LU o
I W
0o
• - U
Ln
0
U ._
N
V �
U') c
� t
4% z
J
z
U
F T�J.
NZzZ
¢JQJ
�Q
s� o�
¢�
z
Z0
•' • r
f
ISO a� o
a,d
• _ i 4 V •�
o
Lu r
r
tjlb
♦ �+
JI. two 0
�
f
.car �. •
r ,��1 �•
�, C7
All
, . H
y� W o
ve
C7
J
LL
LLIcoQ
o Ln
do
J •
z
J
0
. } J
To ';z
R '=z
na
°.
►♦• 1 \ zo
y a ,¢
- � zw
.. r A ► - >
co
YJ N
or
rsa
all
ui
0 Ln
Vii`•,,_ - _� - - _ �
a�
y � .
aw
i � f•. 4w'
O
'dpi"'�' �.¢.'� � �'.� �•+ ," �. "� - y .. �•A� - ,,.-_ "�r �` N ..
ui
+ � .... _ is
Od
rZ
00
40
M, � _ _,; '�(".. �:.. ... , .� M, �tet•� *, ..-y` Z w
1�
1
A
W
f+"�.
NOW �zl
4A 4
;. .01 0L
r� ui 0
uiQ
31
rt V. <.
Z
lob uiJg
z
0
• o0
Z
�t
�'K! �•- -f � ' ../,�' - I, +h., a�:�i � _ - _ � N
a i 4 r mom-
lk-
,. LU 0
kAt
. ,. a
•`' y�y aC r b 'R '' N
LL
40,
'' ♦ H
W
lis
Ln
Oil
0
y.. "' ,.4�,y 1 +i• x.9''8'W 7. p
rZ
00
: y .p;,, L Zw
a3i _ o
U z
'd
f0 C ++
c C-0y >
W
ATp,
ak
• tr
w
u
W O
�c
ui
� o
U Ln
� II
O
w V
7 �
7 (p
r (n (n
IV7z
z
, o
_ o
Nz
o
Y�3 .�
.1d � klF}M p 1 M o.
LL o0o
o
zw
•t• 4l O
� U �
� U
d � W N
J
2
a
O
W p
� a
J
ui
i O E
O 0)
N
OL
L
N y
0) (L)
0
O l(1
: rl
0Lr
>- V
z
L N
O V
` r y z
� Z
_ — o
_ � 0.
Od
ir a
4 a
_ rZ
oQ
Vwo-
. V - - Y r' ' _A,r moi. ,"I�' ..P � l- � •� _�
co
r� W .�` '�� !� "` 't � ^i L�• .. y.� .S � Woam
FSI
X
_ � � ryam,S•'T/ 1 �^ ? .
t U. Q
( • W
r
N o
w' L
IOL
0 Ln
Tw
RR { }
i• n� Z
� , Z
r �► $
Nz
or
arZ�
5 r N¢
� wZ
- zw
• j
a3i _ o
� U �
V 'p�•01
f0 Oc co ++
y >
W C
• Zi 4 � 'i r.i •.f 1 �.J. { 7 t 4
'` T � �7 �1 !.%;(� �►- r�- (• ! ., r •,'� :Y tf Gf•I„� i :����7
�• yr f! + LV O
AI 44
!a,' '�•.. ! !�r' , ��' `' :�. �� "E• rte f _' LL Q
ui
Ln
r Mr
F
L x•.. i' f J1 Ll. � � w
f
.t Sr•'f t'�.,�.r j 1n+�'C j��t. ham. ••.� • •'{yY e i ; � .' 'r� 0 II
1 �: 1 !' 1 �� •�' ��r ! � C
s,
� ffi ,�;�,:
.. -tits.._ } �•- -JO
0.
7u
uiz
t t l g• - ��
°d
0
o�
y' a�i
f rZ
oQ
TR W
N�
Zw
L
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Enclosure B
NEIN YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Division of Fish and Wildlife,New York Natural Heritage Program
625 Broadway,Fifth Floor,Albany,NY 12233-4757
P:(518)402-8935 1 F:(518)402-8925
www.dec.ny.gov
June 27, 2018
Robert Loud
Conifer Realty, LLC
1000 University Ave, Suite 500
Rochester, NY 14607
Re: Vineyard View
County: Suffolk Town/City: Southold
Dear Mr. Loud:
In response to your recent request, we have reviewed the New York Natural Heritage
Program database with respect to the above project.
Enclosed is a report of rare or state-listed animals and plants, and significant natural
communities that our database indicates occur in the vicinity of the project site.
For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted; the enclosed
report only includes records from our database. We cannot provide a definitive statement as
to the presence or absence of all rare or state-listed species or significant natural
communities. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site,
further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess
impacts on biological resources.
Our database is continually growing as records are added and updated. If this proposed
project is still under development one year from now, we recommend that you contact us
again so that we may update this response with the most current information.
The presence of the plants and animals identified in the enclosed report may result in
this project requiring additional review. For further guidance, and for information regarding
other permits that may be required under state law for regulated areas or activities (e.g.,
regulated wetlands), please contact the NYS DEC Region 1 Office, Division of Environmental
Perm its at dep.r1 @dec.ny.gov, 631-444-0365.
Sincerely,
Heidi Krahling
Environmental Review Specialist
653 New York Natural Heritage Program
NEW YORK Department of
OPPORNNIT'f Environmental
Conservation
New York Natural Heritage Program Report on Rare Animals, Rare Plants, and
4 Significant Natural Communities
The following rare plants, rare animals, and significant natural communities
have been documented at the project site, or in its vicinity.
We recommend that potential impacts of the proposed project on these species or communities be addressed as
part of any environmental assessment or review conducted as part of the planning,permitting and approval
process, such as reviews conducted under SEQR. Field surveys of the project site may be necessary to
determine the status of a species at the site,particularly for sites that are currently undeveloped and may still
contain suitable habitat. Final requirements of the project to avoid, minimize, or mitigate potential impacts are
determined by the lead permitting agency or the government body approving the project.
The following natural communities are considered significant from a statewide perspective by the NY Natural
Heritage Program. Each community is either an example of a community type that is rare in the state, or a
high-quality example of a more common community type. By meeting specific, documented criteria,the NY Natural
Heritage Program considers these community occurrences to have high ecological and conservation value.
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS
Upland/Terrestrial Communities
High Quality Occurrence of
Coastal Oak-Hickory Forest Uncommon Community Type
Documented near the project site(if it extends onto the very southeastern corner of the project site, it is not within the 13860
construction area). A fairly large, mature, uniquely diverse coastal oak-hickory forest with some evidence of past
disturbance but few invasive exotic species. This forest forms the core of a recovering, protected landscape surrounded
by development.
Wedand/Aquatic Communities
Red Maple-Swamp White Oak Swamp Rare Community Type
Documented within 0.3 mile southwest of the project site. The community is a mature, mostly intact swamp with less than 8501
1%exotic plants in a post-agricultural, recovering landscape of upland forest, hardwood swamps, freshwater wetlands, and
brackish and estuarine communities.
The following plants are listed as Endangered or Threatened by New York State,and/or are considered rare by the
New York Natural Heritage Program,and so are a vulnerable natural resource of conservation concern.
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS
Vascular Plants
White-edge Sedge Carex debilis var. debilis Threatened Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 25-100 yards south and 0.35 mile east of the project site. 2012-06-26: The plants are in rich, moist 13116
woods and a red maple hardwood swamp with numerous streams,wet spots, and trails. The area is quite extensive and
diverse.
Swamp Smartweed Persicaria setacea Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 220 yards east of the project site. 1992-09-25: Wet woods. Shallow water in an excavated ditch. 6182
9� t AS 9 OZ�S
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS
Vascular Plants
Cranefly Orchid Tipulariadiscolor Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.25 mile of the project site. 713
Seaside Agalinis Agalinis maritima var. Threatened Imperiled in NYS
maritima
Documented within 0.3 mile south of the project site near Pipes Cove. 2012-09-27: The plants are around the 13277
upland edge of a salt marsh.
Swamp Cottonwood Populus heterophylla Threatened Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.35 mile southwest of the project site. 2012-06-28: The plants are in a forested wetland. 3347
Annual Saltmarsh Aster Symphyotrichum subulatum Threatened Imperiled in NYS
var. subulatum
Documented within 0.5 mile south of the project site near Pipes Cove. 2004-09-15:The plants are in the high salt marsh. 13273
Sea Pink Sabatia stellaris Threatened Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.5 mile south of the project site near Pipes Cove. 2004-09-15: The plants are in the high salt marsh 13276
on the edges of the islands and the perimeter of the marsh.
Cat-tail Sedge Carex typhina Endangered Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.5 mile east of the project site. 2012-06-28: This is a rich, moist(mesophytic)woods and hardwood 6813
swamp with numerous streams and wet spots. It is quite extensive and diverse. The plants are on the edge of dense
herbaceous vegetation and an open swamp.
The following animals,while not listed by New York State as Endangered or Threatened,are of conservation concern
to the state,and are considered rare by the New York Natural Heritage Program.
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYSTATELISTING HERITA GE CONSER VA TION STA TUS
Dragonflies and Damselflies
Four-spotted Pennant Brachymesia gravida Unlisted Critically Imperiled in NYS
Documented near ponds within 0.25 mile south and 0.5 mile north of the project site. 2012-07-12: Inlet Pond is a pond on a 13855
beach along the northern shore of the North Fork of Long Island. Skipper Horton Pond is a permanent to semi-permanent
artificial pond near a busy road. Sill Pond is a deep pond with a wooded and shrubby border containing fish and pickerel weed.
Needham's Skimmer Libellula needhami Unlisted Vulnerable in NYS
Documented within 0.25 mile south and 0.5 mile north of the project site. 2012-07-13:Artificial ponds off the side of a 13858
busy road. Inlet Pond is a pond on a beach along the northern shore of the North Fork of Long Island. Sill Pond is a deep
pond containing fish and pickerel weed with a wooded and shrubby border. Cia Cia Pond pond is shallow with a muddy to
mucky substrate, but clear water,with lots of aquatic submerged macrophytes.The pond is bordered by sedges emerging
along the shore,then a tall row of Phragmites with some greenbriar. Crabs were observed in the pond, suggesting some
brackish content.
Seaside Dragonlet Erythrodiplax berenice Unlisted Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.25 mile south of the project site. 2012-07-13: Stackler Salt Marsh is an open,wet,grassy, brackish 13856
marsh extending to the inlet of the bay near a couple of sandy spits. It appears channelized and is naturally fragmented by
upland forest. Cia Cia Pond pond is shallow with a muddy to mucky substrate, but clear water,with lots of aquatic
submerged macrophytes. The pond is bordered by sedges emerging along the shore, then a tall row of Phragmites with
some greenbriar. Crabs were observed in the pond, suggesting some brackish content. Caroll Salt Marsh: Railroad tracks
intersect an open,wet, grassy, brackish marsh extending to the inlet of the bay.The salt marsh is bordered by Phragmites
stands and shrubs line the tracks. Skipper Horton Ponds:A small, shallow pond with some emergent vegetation.
DwarfGlasswort Salicomiabigelovii Threatened Imperiled in NYS
Documented within 0.35 mile south of the project site near Pipes Cove. 2012-09-27: The plants occur in the saltmarsh in 13274
scattered areas that have salt panne.
This report only includes records from the NY Natural Heritage database. For most sites, comprehensive field
surveys have not been conducted, and we cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of
all rare or state-listed species. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site,
further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological
resources.
If any rare plants or animals are documented during site visits,we request that information on the observations be provided to the New
York Natural Heritage Program so that we may update our database.
Information about many of the rare animals and plants in New York, including habitat, biology, identification, conservation, and
management, are available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org, from NatureServe Explorer at
www.natureserve.org/explorer, and from USDA's Plants Database at http://plants.usda.gov/index.html (for plants).
Information about many of the natural community types in New York, including identification, dominant and characteristic vegetation,
distribution, conservation, and management, is available online in Natural Heritage's Conservation Guides at www.guides.nynhp.org.
For descriptions of all community types, go to www.dec.ny.gov/animals/97703.html for Ecological Communities of New York State.
New York Natural Heritage ProgramReport on Historical Records of Rare Animals,
j4 Rare Plants, and Natural Communities
The following rare plants and rare animals have historical records
at your project site, or in its vicinity.
The following rare plants and animals were documented in the vicinity of the project site at one time, but have
not been documented there since 1979 or earlier, and/or there is uncertainty regarding their continued presence.
There is no recent information on these plants and animals in the vicinity of the project site and their current
status there is unknown. In most cases the precise location of the plant or animal in this vicinity at the time it
was last documented is also unknown.
If suitable habitat for these plants or animals is present in the vicinity of the project site, it is possible that they
may still occur there. We recommend that any field surveys to the site include a search for these species,
particularly at sites that are currently undeveloped and may still contain suitable habitat.
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFICNAME NYS LISTING HERITAGE CONSER VA TIONSTA TUS
Amphibians
Northern Cricket Frog Acris crepitans Endangered Critically Imperiled in NYS
1929-05-09: Woods. 6173
Dragonflies and Damselflies
Mantled Baskettail Epitheca semiaquea Unlisted Imperiled in NYS
1953 or 1954?: Greenport. The dragonfly was caught in the vicinity of a town. 12606
Southern Sprite Nehalennia integricollis Special Concern Critically Imperiled in NYS
1953 or 1954?: Greenport. The damselfly was captured in the vicinity of a town. 12696
Vascular Plants
Smooth Tick Trefoil Desmodium laevigatum Endangered Historical Records Only in NYS
1962-09-09: Greenport. Moist ground. 9499
This report only includes records from the NY Natural Heritage database. For most sites, comprehensive field
surveys have not been conducted, and we cannot provide a definitive statement as to the presence or absence of
all rare or state-listed species. Depending on the nature of the project and the conditions at the project site, further
information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources.
If any rare plants or animals are documented during site visits,we request that information on the observations be provided to the New
York Natural Heritage Program so that we may update our database.
t A�s s oZ 1
Vineyard View,Southold
Ecological Review
Enclosure C
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information. _
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s)with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Suffolk County, New York
X'10's C 0
Local office
Long Island Ecological Services Field Office
t. (631) 286-0485
JEJ (631) 286-4003
340 Smith Road
Shirley, NY 11967-2258
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 1/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and
project-specific information is often required. NA
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries-).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
https://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 2/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Birds
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location is outside
the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
NNO
Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii dougallii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. W
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2083
Flowering Plants C\
NAM E STATUS
Sandplain Gerardia Agalinis acuta 0 Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8128
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
it
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act!and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 3/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area,visit the r--bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
............................................................................................................
FORA BIRD ON YOUR LIST,THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
.....................................................................................
PROJECTAREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
.........................................................................................
WHICH IS AVERY LIBERAL
...................................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
...................................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
.........................................................................................
''BREEDS ELSEWHERE'' INDICATES
............................................................................................................
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
............................................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
........................................................................................................
https://ecos.fvvs.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 4/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Breeds Apr 15 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Oct 15 to Aug 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska. 1�4
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
440\0
Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in +*
the continental USA and Alaska.
Buff-breasted Sandpiper Calidris subruficollis Irk Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9488
Q)
.0^ G
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis Breeds May 20 to Aug 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Dunlin Calidris alpina arcticola Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Least Tern Sterna antillarum Breeds Apr 20 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 5/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
httpL//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska. 0
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhe e
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska. 011�
Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Willet Tringa semipalmata Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 6/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort(see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2. N
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
SPECIES ]ANII II FFBI1 II IMAR II yy APR I l MAY JIUNII II JUL I AUG I SSFP
I OCT
TTll NOV I I DII EC
American 14++ TTTT TTTT TTTT I I I; TTT* -11 *I 4+1 TTTT TTTT TTTT T+T+
Oystercatcher
BCC Rangewide
......................................
(CON)(This is a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern(BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 7/13
8/6/2018 lPaC: Explore Location
Bald Eagle 1111 44 1111 111 -1-1-11- tt*+ M11111111
Non-BCC Vulnerable
(This is not a Bird of
.............................................
_2=atiS2
Concern(BCC)in this
..................................
area,T.ut warrants
...........................................
attention because of
Eagle
A c t o r for
o r
,, " ,,""",,,
potential
......................
susceptibilities in!......................
offshore areas from
.............
certain types of
.......................
development or
......................................
activities.)
Black-billed +++4 111 I I I III 1 111 IM
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide-- I- ----
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
Concern(BCC)
..................................
throughout its range
.......................................
in
the.,continental
.USA and.Alaska.)
.........................
BobolinkII I
BCC Rangewide I I I I I I I -I--.
J I I I I I I I I I I
(E6,K)"(This', ', is a Bird
................................................ dir
of Conservation ■T
Concern(BCE).
.....................
throughout its range
....................................
.i.n the continental
............................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Buff-breasted ++++ ++++ TTTT 6 +
++++
Sandpiper
BCC Rangewide
TE6K)"(This'' ', is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
Concern(BCC)
................. .....
throughout its range
....................................
109
b
.in. t h.2.continental
............................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
Canada Warble
.
+
.......................... r
........... + +
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
.. ...
of Conserv._ion.
.Concern(BCC)
N ........................
o
..........ughout its.
.....................................
in the continental
USA d Alaska.)
.........................
Duplin
BCC-BCR(This is a ttt I I I I I I I I I
........................................................................................
B
Conservation
n
Concern(BCC)
only
n1
---- ..--..---
particularBird
.... .........................
Conservation Regions
;i
'7n .......................
(BCR....
..............................
continental USA)
..............................
Hudsonian Godwit
BCC Rangewide
++++ ++++ ++++ II ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ 4114 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
.......................................
_Concern(BCC)
throughout out its range
....................................
.i.n. the. .�2!:�inental
USA and Alaska.)' '"'
..........................
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 8/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Kentucky Warbler
BCCR a n g e w i d e +-I-[-[ ++++ 4.11 111 1111 + 111 1111 tttt tttt tftt
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
a�2!:!=�i.02
Concern(BCC)
throughout'' , its"range
......................................
.i.n. the
USA and Alaska.)' '"'
..........................
Least Tern
BCC-BCR(This is a *++
........................................................................................
B
Conservation
n
Concern(BCC)
only
n1
---- ..--..---
particularBird
..... .........................
Conservation Regions
(BCR.. .......................
...............................
continental USA)
.........................................
Lesser Yellowlegs
BCC Rang---I e-w-1-d-e- t+++
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
......................................n c e r n
..................................
t.h..r.2�ghout its range
... ....................................
.i.n the
continental,",,,,,,,, NO\
.USA and.Alaska.)
..........................
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ 11H I I I
.............. . . ..
C 0 N)(This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
Concern(BCC)
......................
throughout its range
....................................
in the continental
..........................................
USA 2.n.dAla.s.ka..).
.... ............
SPECIES ]AN FEB NIAR APR MAY JUN UL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Purple Sandpiper
BLCEangewicle
.......................
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
of Conservation
......................................
......
Concern(BCC)
......................
throughout its range
.................................................
.i.n the continental
............................
<
Red-throated Loon
!BCC Ra.M2yy.j.!. . N I I 11-*+ 0**+
(CON)(This is a Bird f
of. Conser'vation
Concern(BCC)
......................
....................
throughout its range
in the'continental
..........................................
.U.SA..�.ncl Alaska.)
..........................
Rusty Blackbird
BCC R-a-n-g-e-w-i-d-e- 1111114
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
a�2!:!=�i.02
Concern(BCC)
throughout out its range
....................................
.i.n. the. .�2!:�inental
USA and Alaska.)' '"'
..........................
Semipalmated +++*+ 4111110+011111111 +*++
Sandpiper
BCC R-a-n-g-e-w-i-d-e-
(CON)(This is a Bird
................................................
a�2!:!=�i.02
Concern(BCC)
throughout out its range
....................................
.i.n. the. .�2!:�inental
USA and Alaska.)' '"'
.........................
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 9/13
8/6/2018 |Poc: Explore Location
Short-billed |ll� ll|1 llJ | | | | | |||| llll l4l|
Dnwhcher T | | ' | | T | | | | | | | | | ||| | | | | | | | | | | mp | q" TTT | TTTT | | | | | . | |
u
(CON)(This is a Bird
_____
thro
�g out its range
«»iU*t | | L| |||l |||| llll l�l|
�ccxan /u T | | ' | | T | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | T TTT | TTTT
(CON)(This is a Bird
_____
Concern{Bcc�
t�;o u- ���,i�,an
Wood Thrush
BCC n" m | ll J� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | � /L |||| 1-1_4 | | L||
2�om�v�on
.i.n. t h.2.continental 0
.U..S.A.2.n.d A.la.s.ka..). \
Tell me more about conservation measures U can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory binds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts toall birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area.When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction isavery helpful impact minimization measure.Tosee when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area,view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present onyour project site.
What does UPa[ use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised ofUSFVVS (BCC)and other species
that may warrant special attention inyour project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Networ�
`
The AKN data isbased onagrowing collection ofsJ1vey' ban�n�' and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 1 Okm grid cell(s)which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, aneagle (Lagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities ordevelopment.
Again' the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the E-lird1Explore .
What does |Pa[ use to generate the probability ofpresence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring inrnyspecified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network_(Ab�N).This data is derived from agrowing collection ofsurvey,1baldi]g. and citizen
science clatasets .
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available.To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them,go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,wintering, migrating or
year-round),you may refer to the following resources:The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area,there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated,then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii,the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC- BCR" birds are BCGs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the
continental USA; and ,0 1 -
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements(for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular,to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal.The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately,you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles,you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern.To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ"What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the"probability of presence"of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 11/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the"no data" indicator(a
red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and,therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species.This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present).The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed.To learn more about conservation
measures,visit the FAQ"Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds"at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands ,
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Retugt system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
106
Fish hatcheries .0
<XG
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01E
PF01 C
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 12/13
8/6/2018 IPaC: Explore Location
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location,type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery.Wetlands are identified based on vegetation,visible hydrology and geography.A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery,thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions I nl�4
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands.These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities(coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth,go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory.There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory,to define the limits of proprietaryjurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
\%�p X
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/EUZA5GLRMNACDBBYELDYYHQCA4/resources 13/13