The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YOKK ACTION OF THE ZON~qG BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 1986 DaSd December ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF AP~EAI~S OF THE TO%~rN OF SOUTHOLD To Catherine W. Drake 3050 Fairway Drive Cutchogue, New York DATE. J.a~.....R., 1975 12, 1974 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Beard of Appeals on January 9, was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance X Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ) 19 7 5 the appeal 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 9:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Catherine W. Drake, 3050 Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 (C) and 100-32 (A) for permission to construct antenna mast of excessive height. Location of property: Lot 16, Fairway Farms, Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York. Fee paid $15.00. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because SEE REVERSE practical difficulties (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ord/nance and (would) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. APPRUVED ChaJ 'l i'l McDermott, Secretary After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to construct antenna mast of excessive height on Lot 16, Fairway Farms, Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant's request that antenna mast be located on the southwest portion of the property is a reasonable one because of the swampy condition of the ground on the southeast corner of the property. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all p~operties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. ~ THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Catherine W. Drake, 3050 Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York be GRANTED permission to construct antenna mast of excessive height on the southwest portion of the property, Lot 16, Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the antenna mast shall be no higher than 55 feet above ground level. That the antenna mast shall be located no closer than 15 feet to the southwest corner of the property; and no closer than 15 feet to any property line. That at such time as Cablevision enters the development, applicant agrees to hook into that service and remove his tower. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. c Legal Notice Page 2 8:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Beryl Steadman, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-35, for permission to construct front yard fence over four feet. Location of property: N/S Sound Avenue, Mattituck, bounded on the north by E. Gilles; east by H. Gilbourne; south by Sound Avenue; west by Long Island Lighting Company. 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of LeRoy and Martha Paul, 240 Billard Road, Cutchogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 (C) (5) for permission to4accessory building (stable) on existing foundation which is not in required rear yard area. Location of property: E/S Billard Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by Stoutenberg; east by Heitman; south by Heitman; west by Billard Road. 9:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Catherine W. Drake, 3050 Fairway Drive, Cutch0gue, New York for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 (C) and 100-32 (A) for permission to construct antenna mast of i! excessive height. Location of property: Lot 16, Fairway Farms, Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York. 9:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Andrew Galgano and Others, 162 Park Avenue, Bethpage, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning and Section 280A Town Law, approval of access because Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 for permission to divide lot and for of lack of approved access. Location of property: R.O.W. off northeast side of Westphalia Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Howard Creak; east by now or formerly Gimbernat; south by Penny & Schutt; west by Schutt and Others. LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings existing building with insufficien Pursuant to Section 267 of the width and area. Location of pro- Town Law and the provisions of perty: North side Private Road- .... n ^rdi North Drive, bounded on the~-~,,,~,-,-,, ~,,-r ........ ..... i by W. Johnson; south by North-~''~'*- vr ~,~-vv . , ~ ~_ ,~ ,_ .~._ View Drive (Pvt Rd ); west by Zoning Board of Appeals of the Helen Hass. Town of Southold, at the Town 10:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- Office, Main Road, Southold, plication of Richard Cron, Esq. Sherley Kotz. being duly sworn, says that she is on NewYork, on January 9, 1975, on a/c Ivan T. Honnett, Orchard Street, New Suffolk, New York forEditOr, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER - MATTITUCK the following appeals: 7:4S P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- a variance in accordance with theWATCHMAN' a public newspaper printed at Soufhold, plication of Harvey Bagshaw, Zoning Ordinance, Article 111 Deep Hole Drive. Mattituck. New Section 100-31 and Bulk ScheduleIn Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the York for a ~ariance in accordance for permission to alter and rebuildannexed is a printed copy, has been published in said with the Zoning Ordinance. dwelling on non-conforming lot Article Vll, Section 100-70 (B) (f) with two existing dwellings. Loea-Long Island Trove[er-Mottituck Watchman once each for permission to construct Body tion of property: Orchard & Third i ..f. Shop on property which may not Streets, New Suffolk, New York,week for ........... be 300 feet from a residential bounded on the north by Orchard / the street. Location of property: by Helen Kapp; west by G. N/S Main Road, Laurel (Dist. 11), Lombardi. ~oy Of ' r ' ......................... ,.~ .......... , 19 ......(.. New York, bounded on the north 10:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- by J. O'Conne,l; east by A.plicati°n°fwilliamJ'Clark'esq' ~f~f~_~ Goodale; south by Main Road: a/c Wilfred & Anna Corwin, C- York for a variance in accordance 8:1S P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- Avenue (Skunk Lane), Cutch- Article I11, Section 100-30 and / ague, New York for a variance in Bulk Schedule for permission to accordance with the Zoning Or- divide odd shaped lot resulting in Sworn to before me this ............. dinance, Article III, Section a reduction of public road front- 100-30 (C) and 100-32 for per- age and area of remaining lot. . ......... '...~.;~.......;L~. .......... ]9..;~..... garage in the front yard area of Avenue, Walnut Place, Sound the lot. Location of property: S/S Avenue, Mattituck, New York, of Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane), bounded on the north by Yar- bounded on the north by Bay russo; east by Walnut Place; - Avenue (Skunk Lane); east by south by Corwin; west by Factory ............ ,~.,L..:...;,,.~,...~., ............. ;...;.,:.-,..~.-tt .............. other land of applicant; south by Avenue. l~ot~r~ Pt~lle Broadwater Cove/Graham; west 10:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Rudolph Bruer, Esq., by other land of applicant, a/c Anne C. Lemley, Bay Ave- 8:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- nue, East Marion, New York for a plication of Valentine Ruch IV, Section 100-30 and Bulk Sched- for permission to divide lot with existing buildings with insuffici- ' ule, and Section 100-12, for per- ent width and area. Location of which will reduce width of Lots 2 and 3. Location of property: Lots 2 East Marion, New York, bounded and 3, Map of Shorecrest, south on the north by J. Fazio; east by Private R.O.W.; south by Lc- side CR 27, Southold, New York. browski and Heroy; west by Bay 8:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- Avenue. plication of Beryl Steadman, Any person desiring to be Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New heard on the above appeals York for a variance in accordance should, appear at the time and with the Zoning Ordinance, place above specified. Article 111, Section 100-35, for Dated December 26, 1974 permission to construct front yard BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD fence over four feet. Location of TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS property: N/S Sound Avenue, 1T21/2 Mattituck, bounded on the north by E. Gilles; east by H. Gil- bourne; south by Sound Avenue; west by Long Island Lighting Company. 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of LeRoy and Martha Paul, 240 Billard Road, Cutch- ague, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article 1II, Section 100-30 (C) (5) for permission to construct accessory building (stable) on existing foundation which is not in required rear yard area. Loca- tion of property: E/S Billard Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by Stouten- berg; east by Heitman; south by Heitman; west by Billard Road.~ ~):15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Catherine W. Drake, 3050 Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York for a variance in ac- cordance with the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article lIl, Section 100-30 (C) and 100-32 (A) for permission to construct antenna mast of ex- cessive height· Location of pro- perty: Lot 16, Fairway Farms. Fairway Drive, Cutcho~ue, New York. ~ 9:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Andrew Galgano and Others, 162 Park Avenue, Beth- page, New York fog a variance ~ accordan¢~ with tile Zoning Ordi- nance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Section 280A Town Law, for permission to divide lot and for approval of access because of lack of approved access. Location of property: R.O.W. off northeast side of Westphalia Road, Matti- tuck, New York, bounded on the north by Howard Creek; east by now or formerly Gimbernat; south by Penny & Schutt; west by Schutt and Others. 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upbn ap- plication of George Stankevich, Esq., a/c Edna Doll, Brown's Hills Estates, Orient, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 111, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedul( for permission to divide lot with NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Beard of Appeals of the Town of Southold, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, on January 9, 1975, on the following appeals: 7:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap-. plieatien of Harvey Bagshaw, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, New York for a variance in ac- cordance with the Zoning Or- dinance, Article VII, Section 13O- 70 (B) (f)for permission to comltruct Body Shop on property which may not be 300 feet from a residential zone on the Bray Avenue side of the street. Location of property: N-S Main Road, Laorel (Dist. 11), New York, bounded on the north by J. O'Connoll; east by A. Geedaie; south by Main Road; west by O'connell. 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plieation of Angelo Petrucel, Bay 'Avenue (Skunk Lane), Cut- choglle, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IH, Section 100-30 (C) and 100-~ for per- mission to construct private garage in the front yard area of the lot. Location of property: S-S of Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane), beonded on the north by Bay Avenue (Skunk Lane); east by other land of appUcant; south by Broadwater Cove-Graham; west by other land of applicant. 8:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Valentine Ruch IV, Ruch Lane, Scuthold, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IH, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule, and Section 100-12, for permission to construct drain sump which will reduce width of Lots 2 and 3. Location of property: Lots 2 and 3, Map of Shorecrest, south side CR 27, Seuthold, New York. 8:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Beryl Steadman, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York for a variance in ac- cordance with the Zoning Or- dinance, Article III, Section 100- 35, for permission to construct front yard fence over four feet. Location of property: N-S Sound Avenud; Mattituck, bounded on the north by E. Gilles; east by H. Gilbourne; south by Sound Avenue; west by Long Island Lighting Company. 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of LeRoy and Martha Paul, 240 Billard Road, Cut- chogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 (C) (5) for permission to construct accessory building (stable) on existing foundation which is not in required rear yard area. Location of property: E-S Billard Road, Cutchegue, New York, bounded on the north by Stoutenberg; east by' HeRman; south by Heitman; west by Billard Road. [~licatio, of Catherine 1050 Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, ~lew York for a variance in ac- LEGAL NOTICE cordance with the Zoning Or- dinance, Article III, Section 13O- 30 (C) and 100-32 (A) for per- mission to construct antenna mast of excessive height. Location of property: LOt 16, Fairway Farms, Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, New York. 9:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Andrew Galgano and Others, 162 Park Avenue, Beth- page, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IH; Section 13O-3O and Section 280A Town Law, for permission to divide lot and for approval of access because of lack of approved access. Location of property: R.O.W. off northeast side of Westphalia Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Howard Creek; east by now or formerly Gimberoat; south by Penny & Schutt; west by Schutt and 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication.of George Stankevich, Esq., a-c Ed=a Doll, Brown's Hills Estates, Orient, New York. for a variance in accordance with for pormism'en to divide lot with exist~ building with insufficient width and area, Location of property: North side Private Road-North Drive, benoded on the north by Long Island Sound; east by W. Johnsan; south by North View Drive (POI. Rd.); west by Helen Haes, 10:~0 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plieation of Hie. hard Cron, Esq. a- c Ivan T. ltoanett, Orchard Street, New Suffolk, New York for a variance ia accordance with the Zonin~ Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ,~ ss: J plication of William J. Clark, Esq. a-c Wilfred & Anna Corwin, Factory Avenue, Mattituck, New York for a variance in ac- cordance with the Zoning Or- dinance, Article III, Section 13O- 30 and Bulk Scheduie for per- mission to divide odd shaped lot resulting in a reduction of public road frontage and area of remaining tot. Location of property: Factory Avenue, Walnut Place, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Yarrusso; east by Walnut Place, south by Corwin; west by Factory Avenue. 10:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap. plication of Rudolph Bruer, Esq. a-c Anne C. Lendey, Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100~3O and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide lot with existing buildings with in- sufficient width and area. Location of property: South side Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York, beonded on the north'by J. Fazio; east by Private R.O:W.; south by Lebrowski and Heroy; west by Bay Avenue. Any person desiring to be heard on the above appeals shouid appear at the time and place above specified. DATED: December 26, 1974 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS My Commission [x~ires March 30, 19,//,~',,, thezoningOrdinance, Article III, .SI:LIAI't:..C .Dormatl. ......... being duly Sworn, Section 10o-3o and Bulk Schedule ........ *' sm/s that . ...... he is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, a newspaper published ~rt Greenport, in said county; and that the notice, of which the mmexed is a printed copy, has been published in the said Suffolk Weekly Times once in each week, tot ........ .0.~.~..(.~..) .......... weeks successively oommencing on the ...... .S.e.c.o..n.d. ............ day of ...~.a..m~..~X ...... .~... 19 .... 75 for permissien to alter and Swolql t/o before me this...~. ....... rebuild dwelling on, non- day o~ ~.~.~,.~.~/~:. ~ conforming lot with two existing ~/~~ dwellings. Location of property: Orchard & Third Streets, New by Third Street; south by ltelon [ ~ J~'~_PH [~.~r~,t~r Kapp; west by G. Lombardi. '---~' I~IOiAh:Y ?UBLIC OF NEW Y0~K 10:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- FORi~ NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DIEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL P'LE~SE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ¢-~ / ~ ' ~9..~..~. for permit to construct ~ ..... at the premises ]~ated r '~ disapprov~ on the following grognds ..... ~.~~ Building Inspectf3r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. /~--~ DATE ~,~C_'~ l ~-,~ ~-7 ~c- TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Name of Appellont Street and Number ..... .~.~.~ffff~.~.~.~ .......................................................... .... .....~/' ....... ff'............_~E~RV ...... APPEL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE/~UILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO .................................... DATED ..~[.2~..~.:~..~l .~.. .......... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Name of Applicant for permit Street and Number Municipali~ State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ~,¢~'/L ~'[ p/C/Y/=- Street Use District on Zoning Map Mep No, Lot 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (~) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE aue to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal [has) (['m~eem~-been made with respect to this decisior a~ the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit (~) request for a variance and was made Jn Appeal No....~.~...~....( ............... Dated /~ 0 ~, ~ / 1 c~'z ~ REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (~) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued saW HARDSHIP because STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficuIfie.s or unneces- 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by ail properties elike in the immediate vicinity of this property and m this use district because ~/-//~_ Z~0¢-/-~'~'0~¢ /2&2/~,~ f~q~E:/b 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance end WOULD NOT CHANGE q'HE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because /~/~%~¢' ~Lr p/~ ~ / ~/~ D 9, b?, STATE OF NEW YORK / ) SS COUNTY OF SS'7~OLtC ) Signoture Sworn to this ............. J..O~. ........................ day of...-..l~e, aambe~= .................................. ]9 ?~ ~o. 52-5806770 November 19, 1974 Mr. Philip L. Babcock Pralty Lane Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 Dear Mr. Babcock: Re: Appeal No. 1931 After further investigation of the southeast corner of Lot No. 16, 3050 Fairway Drive, Cutchogue, we would suggest that you submit a new application for a variance to place the TV antenna tower kD the southwest portion of the property for the reason that the marshy land in the southeast corner would constitute a unique hardship. Your previous Appeal NO. 1931 did not specify this condition as a hardship. Yours truly, :MM CC; Mr. George B. Drake Marjorie McDermott, Secretary il' GEO. B. DRAKE MARINE ARCHITECT & ENGINEER P. O. BOX 807 CUTCHOGUE. N. Y. 11935 October 31, 1974 Board of Appeals Care of Town Clerk Office Main Road Southold, L.I., N.Y. 11971 Dear Sirs: Re: 3050 The Fairway The Town Board kindly heard our appeal for a variance on the installation of a TV antenna tower away from our home. How- ever, they would not accept t?~e location preferred by the writer as well as our prospective antenna installer. ?ne Board would permit the tower in the southeast corner of our lot whereas we all preferred the southwest corner. The southeast corner is low and adjacent to the wet-lands and undesirable. Enclosed please find copy of letter from Southampton Elec- tronics bearing out the above contention. We do not feel that the timing and the excessive cost in- volved in tieing in to L. I. Cablevision is as suitable as the installation of our own tower and antenna and respect- fully request t~at you reconsider the Board's decision. rs very tr~kly, George B. Drake GBD/h~m~ 1111111111111 IIII II I IIIIIIIII O0 SOUTHAMPTON I:'LEnTRONIOE; ASc;OOIAT~'S NORTH HIGHWAY OCTOBER 10, 1974 MR. GEORGE DRAKE BOX 80? CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. DEAR MR. DRAKEt THE LOCATION FOR THE TV TOWER IN TH~ 'SWAMPY CORNER OF YOUR LOT WILL NOT BEC SUITABLE, BECAUSE WE CANNOT GUARANTEE THAT NO CLAY WILL BE ENCOUNTEREO. IF WE FI~D CLAY, WE WI LL BE FORCED TO DIG UNTIL WE FIND SOLID GROUND, WHICH COULD RE VANY FEET BELOW GRADE. THIS MAY ENTAIL PROHIBITVE EXPENSE. ~ORMALLY, YOUR TOWER WILL BE ~RO~F AGAINST HURRICANE FORCE WINOS WITH ONE YARD OF CONCRFTE. IT MAY TAKE AN UNTOLD AMOUNT IN THE SWAMPY SECTION, WE HAVE BEEN INSTALLING THESE TOWERS SINCE 19~ ANO HAVE YET TO HAVE ONE COME DOWN UNLESS WE TAKE IT DOWN, AMONG THE MANY TOWERS WE HAVE INSTALLED, SOUTHOLD HIQHWAY OEPARTMENT IN 1963 AND sOUTH. OLO POLICE DEPARTMENTN IN 1~5, SUB~ECgENTLY MOVED TO NEW POLICE HEAOWUARTERS~ COME TO MIND. WE HAVE ALSO INSTALLED THI~ TYPE TOWER FOR LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY IN HAUPPAGUE ON THEIR THEIR HIGH TENSION LINE. IF THERE WERE ISLAND LIGHTING WOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED RIGHT OF~Y, WITHIN 75 gEET OF ANY DANGER OF COLLAPSE, LONG THI~ INSTALLATION~ WHICH HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 196~. YOU CAN ~PPRECIATE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO ELFC~RtC SERVICE IF THIS TOWER WERE TO COME DOWN. WE ALSO HAVE INSTALLED SUCH A TOWER IN AMI TYVILLE WITHIN SIX FEET OF A 2~,000 VOLT LINE WHICH HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE 1960. IF THERE IS ANY QUESTION ABOUT THE DURABILITY OR SAFETY OF THESE TOWERS, WE CAN INCREASE THE WIND IACARIN~ LOAD TO 170 MPH BYDOURLING THE CONCRETE SOUTHAMPTON ELECTRONICS ASSDOIATES NORTH HIGHWAY SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y, 11~B FOOTING TO TWO CUBIC YARDS. OCTOBER 10, WE SPECIFY 3,000 LBS BEARING CONCRETE. AMONG THE TOWERS WE HAVE INSTALLED, ALL STILL STANDING, FROM 195~ ON; EASTHAPTON TOWN P.D.i EASTHAPTON TOWN F.D. REPIJ~LIC AIRCRAFT, MONTAUK (NOW AT MONTAUK F.D) RITE FUEL OIL, PATCHOGUE NORTH SEA PLUMBING, SOUTHAMPTON KORAL ~ROTHERS, SOUTHAMPTON OHAS. GULDI AND SONS, $OtJTHAMPTON BISTRIAN GRAVEL, SOUTHAYPTON APPROXIMATELY 200 TOWERS, ROHN MODEL 25, SIMILAR TO TYPE WE PROPOSE TO INSTALL FOR YOUR ACCOUNT. ARNOLD TAMCHIN, SEATAIIKFT ALL OUR TOWERS A GUARANTFFO AGAINST FAULTY WORKMANSHIP OR FAULTY INSTALLATION FOR FIVE YEARS. WE HAVE AS YET HAD NO OCCASION TO MAKE GOOD ON OUR GUARANTEE, EITHER BY REASON Of MATERIAL OR INSTALLATION FAUI_T. VERY TRULY YOURS SAMUEL MARGOLIS (c) In addition to the construction provided for by subdivisions (a) and (b) of this paragraph 5, upon the request of any householder in the Town for cablevialon service which requires an extension of the cable system, LICC will conduct a surv~' of the area requested, including cost esti.mates for such extension. In the event that such sudsy indicates that there will be mor~ t~n eilht (8)'~Subacribers~for each $1, 000 of capital cost of such ~xtension, LICC a~rees to construct such extension at its own cost and ~snse, In the event, however, ~at such survey indicates that there will be l~ss than eight (8) subscribers for each $1~ 000 of capital cost of such ixte~io~ LICC shall co~truct such extension if the subscribers [~ the area of such extension agree to contribute to the Capital cost of such extension in accordance with the following table, to wit: Nurnbel; of Subscribers., LICC C ontrib ut. io_.~.n Capital Par ticipatioa per ,~1,000 invested Total SubScriber Contribution Individual Subscriber Contr,i~? ation 8 and over $1,000.00 None None ? 847.00 ;5 153.00 $ 22,00 6 673.00 327,00 55.00 5 500.00 500.00 100, 00 4 327,00 673. O0 168, O0 ~ None 1,000. O0 333. O0 2 None I, 000.00 500.00 I None 1,000.00 1,000.00 It is the intention of the above subscriber capital contribution plan to return subscriber capital contributions to the subscribers, as, if, and when additional subscribers connect to the cable system in the area of such extension. Therefore. LICC agrees that it will during the term of this agreement, collect subscriber contributions from each new subscriber in the, area of such extension and disburse the same eouitably to all subscribers in the area of such extension. LICC shall, at the time of each disbu, fsemant to subscribers, prepare and mail to each affected subscriber, an of such capital contribution factor.-4- {~ /! ~ ' '/73. ~5 '. - .~ ' Lot /5 ~" ~~ Co~Pony Fork Nort~ ~ ~ MONUMENT ~UBDIFISIONMAP FILED IN TH~ OFF/CE . OF TH~ C~EBK OFSUFFOLK COUNT Y ON FEB. I~ MAY 8, 1974 YOUNG & YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE. RIVERHEAB NEW YORK ALDEN W. y~UNG HOWARD W. YOUNG SURVEY FOR: GEORGE B. DRAKE 1JR LOT NO. t6, II FAIRWAY FARMS" AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN Of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK. CO,, N.Y. SCALE ~,, : 50i DATE: MAR. 14,1974