Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21741020 Glam Road 217~ WENDELL, ROBERT W. ivide lot with existing buildings (Pine Neck Rd. & N. Rd. to Bsyview) FILED: 7/29/76 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the. provisions of the ~nnended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of .Appeals at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York on August 12~ 1976, on the following appeals: 8:10 P.M. (E.D.SoT.) upon application of Pinewood Landscaping. a/c Gianfranco Monacelli, Perry's Drive, Orient, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct accessory building in front yard area. Location of property: north side Petty's Drive, Orient, New York; Map of Petty's Bight, Lot ~2, Petty's Drive, Orient, N.Y. 8:20 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Horace and Ruth Terryr 125 North Lakewood Circle, Maitland 1, Florida (Irving L. _Price, Jr., Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 100-30 & Bulk Schedule for permission to divide lots with insufficient width and area, and approval of access. Location of property: Private road off north side of Main Road~ Orient, New York, bounded on the north by DiLorenzo; east by Conroy; south by S%ephenson; west by Long Island Sound. 8:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon appiica%ion of John E. Rempe, 676 Bayshore Road, Greenport, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article iii, Section 100-30 C (6f) for permission to erect off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Main Road and Kerwin Boulevard, Arshamo~aque, New York; Map of Peconic Bay Estates, Lot ~i78. 8:40 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of John Zazecki, Main Road, Southo!d, New York for a variance in accordanc~ with the Zoning Ordinance, Arhicle iii, Section 100-30 & Bulk Legal Notice Hearings: August 12, 1976 Schedule for permission to set off a lot with insufficient 'width. L6cation of property: South side Main Road, Willow Hill, Southold, New York, bounded on north by Main Road; east by Schmitt; south by Milford; west by other land of applicant. 8:50 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Ella Reinhardt, Reydon Drive, Southold, New York (Edward John Boyd V, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article iii, Section 100-30 & Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with insufficient width and area. Location of property: west side Reydon Drive, north side West Shore Drive, Southo!d, New York; Lots 1 to 6, Section A, Reydon Shores. 9:00 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Robert Adipie~ro, Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 B (1) for permission to use existing premises for two-family house. Location of property: east side Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York, bounded on the north by now or formerly Turner; east by~Hairston; south by Hairston and L.i.R.R.; west by Peconic La. 9:15 P.M. (E.D.S.T~) upon application of Robert W. Wendell, 1020 Glen Road, Southold, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article iii, Section 100-30 & Bulk Schedule for permission to divide lot with existing Du!!d~ngs. Location of property: Pine Neck Road and North Bayview Read, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Pine Neck Road; east by North Road to Eayview; south by Van Zandt; west by Cowan and Jordan. 9:25 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Dorothy K©narski, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Iii, Section 100-30 A (a) (!) for pe_~mission %o enlarge farm stand. Location of proper~y: south side Main Road, Cutchogue, New York bounded on north by Main Road; east by Krupski; west by K!os. Legal Notice 9:35 P.M. Bearings: August 12, 1976 (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Miche!ine M. Mccracken, 5311 Pali Point, LaCanada, California (Iserman & Iserman, Attorneys) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with existing dwellings. Location of property: west side Montauk Avenue, Fishers island, New York, bounded on the north by S. Morell; east by Montauk Avenue; south by Hedge; west by Right-of-way. Any person desiring to be heard on the above Appeals should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: July 30, 1976 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTBOLD TOW~ BOARD OF APPEALS PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, AUGUST 5,, 1976, AND FORWARD NINE (9) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO _HE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, MAIN ROA~D, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. Copies mailed to the following on July 30, 1976: Pinewood Landscaping a/c Gianfranco Menace!ii Horace and Ruth Terry (Irving L. Price~ Jr., Attorney) John E. Rempe John Zazecki Edward John Boyd V, a/c E-la Reinhardt Robert Adipietro Robert W. Wendell Dorothy Konarski Iserman & Iser~m~an a/c Miche!ine M. McCracken LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Office, Main Road, Seuthold, New York on August 12, 1976, on the following appeals: 8:10 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Pinewood Land- scaping a-c Gianfranco Monacelli, Petty's Drive, Orient, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct accessory building in front yard area. Location of property: north side Petty's Drive, Orient, New York; Map of Perry's Bight, Lot No. 2, Petty's Drive, Orient, N.Y. 8:20 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Horace and Ruth Terry, 125 North Lakewood Circle, Maitland 1, Florida (Ir- ving L. Price, Jr., Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 100-30 & Bulk Schedule for permission to divide lots with insufficient width and area, and approval of access. Location of property: Private road off north side of Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded on the north by DiLorenzo; east by Conroy; south by Stephenson: west by Long Island Sound. 8:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of John E. Rempe, 676 Bayshore Road, Greenpert, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C (6f) for Permission to erect off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Main Road and Kerwin Boulevard, Arshamomaque, New York; Map of Peconic Bay Estates, Lot No. 178. 6:40 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of John Zazecki, Main Road, Seuthold, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 & Bulk Schedule for permission to scl off a lot with insufficient width. Location of properly: South side Main Road, Willow Hill, Seuthold, New York, bounded on north by Main Road, east by Schmitt; south by Milford; west by other land of applicant· 8:50 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Ella Reinhardi, Reydon Drive, Seuthold, New York (Edward John ~yd V, Attorney) for a varia. · in ac- cordance with the Zoning Or- dinance, Article III, Section 100- 30 & Bulk Schedule for per- mission to set off lot with in- sufficient width and area. Location of property: west side Reydon Drive, north side West Shore Drive, Southold, New York; Lots 1 to 6, Section A, Reydon Shores. 9:00 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Robert Adipietro, Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 B (1) for permission to use ~,OUNTY OF SUFFOLI~, ~TA-r~- OF NEW YORK, ~ ss: .... ~.~.'~?.i.~ C....~?.~.~,q .... being du s~s that h~ is Printer ~d Publisher of ~e ~ WEEKLY TIMES, a news~per pub~sh~ ~ Gr~npo county: and ~at the noti~, of which ~e anne~ is ~py, ~s ~en published in the ~d Suf~lk W~ once in e~ch w~k, ~or ......... ~'.~e..(.~ ....... existing premises for two-family house. Location of property: east side Peconic Lane, Peeanic, New York, bounded on the north by now or formerly Turner; east by successivf=Iy commencin9 on the Hairston; south by Hairston and ~l~Y of .~-~u.~_. '~ 19 L.I.R.R.; west by Peconic La. ~ ~_ ~.~f. .... 9:15 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Robert W. Wen- ~~. ¥..-..~ .............. 'dell, 1020 Glen Road, Southold, SwoI~ to begoreme this ...~i~..~... New York for a variance in ac- ~-~~ cordance with the Zoning Or- duy ul ...... dinance, Article III, Section 100- 30 & Bulk Schedule for per- . ........................ buildings. Location of property: ...... Pine Neck Road and North Bayview Road, Seuthold, New York, bounded on the north by /~'O?.q~&l~mmC~,,l~. DO~(~ Pine Neck Road; east by North Re~d~q°~&l~C~ate Road to Bayview; south by Van ~1,--On,leik C Zandt; west by Cowan and c'~- · '~.c~. ~o 52 St~eo~unlit Jordan. 9:25 P.M. (E.D.S.~ Xp~res M~ 30, 19. application of Dorothy Konars~, Main ~ad, Cutchogue, New York for a v~iance in ae- cord~ce wi~ the ~ning Or- · nance~ ~icle III, Section ~ A (a) (1) for pe~ission to effiarge f~m stud. ~cation of property: south side Main ~ad, Cutchogue, New York ~d~ on no~h by M~n R~d; east by ~ups~; west by Klm. 9:35 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Micheline M. MeCracken, 5311 Pall Point, ~C~ada, CMifornia (Ise~ & Ise~, Attorneys) for a vari~ce in ac~ee wi~ the ~n~g O~in~ee, Article III, Section 1~ and B~k ~h~e for ~ission to ~de property with ~sting dwellings. ~cation of property: west side Montauk Avenue, Fishe~ Isled, New York, ~ded on the nOrfh by ~ Morell east by Montaug Avenue; south by He~e; west by Right~f-way. ~y pecan desiring to ~ h~rd on the a~ve AppeMs shoed up,ar at the time and place a~ve sp~ified. Dat~: J~y 30, 1~6 BY ORDER OF T~ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOA~ OF APPE~ 1TA~2~I for permission to set o~i~qb-C~I~ insufficient width and area. Loca- tion of property: west side Rey- don Drive, north side West Shore Drive, Southold, New York; Lots 1 to 6, Section A, Reydon Shores. 9:00 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Robert Adipietro, Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York, for a special exception in cordance with the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article IH, Section 100-30 B (1) for permission to use existing premises for two-family house. Location of property: east side Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York, bounded on the north by now or formerly Turner; east by Halrstoa; south by Hairston and L.LR.R.; west by Peconic La. -~ ~ 9:15 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon a~ plication of Robert W. Wendel~ 1020 Glen Road, Southold, Ne~ York, for a variance in accordanc~ with the Zoning Ordinance Article II1, Section 100-30 & Bull Schedule for permission to divide lot with existing buildings. Ix)ca- tion of property: Pine Neck Road and North Bayview Road, South- old, New York, bounded on the north by Pine Neck Road; east by North Road to Bayview; south by Van Zandt; west by Cowan and .~Jordan. 9:25 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Dorothy Konarski, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A (a) (1) for permission to enlarge farm stand. Location of property: south side Main Road, Cutchogue, New York bounded on north by Main Road; east by Krupski; west by Klos. 9:3S P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Micheline M. Mc- Cracken, 5311 Pali Point, La- Canada, California (lserman & Isorman, Attorneys) for a vari- anco in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IH, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with existing dwellings. Location of property: west side Montauk Avenue, Fishers Island, New York, bounded on the north by S. Morell; east by Montauk Avenue; south by Hedge; west by Right- of-way. Any person desiring to be heard on the above Appeals should appear at the time and place above specified· Dated/July 30, 1976 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1T-8/5 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SO~JTHOLD BUILDING D~EP~ARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHO~.D, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL~ PLEASE 'FA~E. N0~I, CE that your application dat~.~ .~;~.~.~ ~:~ ~ ~ 19 2 for ermit fro~ ~'~h~i-~... ~at~t,h~e p!~'r~'~o'c~t~'~a~' .......... ~.'ii~ z~"~-- ...~..~:....~....r..~.......~ ..... ~,.~ r~~ .~~~h--a~ disapproved on the following grounds ........................................................... .~....,.~.~.~...~:.~...~.:..~...~.~~....~.~...~ ........... - Building Inspector /' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK' APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. APPEAL NO. J / 7~/ DATE ..~ ~Z.. ?..,9.~....?..9..76 Name of Appella,nt Street and Number Southold New York ......................................................................................................................... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BU~ING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED ...//.z~...~../~ ................................ ( ) ( ) (X) N:me of Applicant for permit of ....... .e...n... ,... ........................................ Street anc Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY Permit to Divide Property 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY c~.~P.i.n...e..~.~.e..c..¢~.R...~...~.~:~.~.a.~i.q.w.~*~:.S..~...uth~a Street Use District on Zoning Mop .. Noz~e ..................................................................... fAap No. Lot No. A-RES 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of th~ Z_~oning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the~nce.) z__~~ ~ --~:~r,~ 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordin.once or Zoning Map A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4 PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~) (has notYbeen made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such oppeo~ was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................ Dated ...................................................................... ( ) eX) ( ) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ~s requested for the reason that the applicant has an oversized lot compared to the other lots in the block. ]~orm ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficultiesorunneces- sory HARDSHIP because the Applicant's lot is more than twice as large as the average size of the lots in the block in which the property is located. Please see attached map and schedule of lots and sizes indicating that the average lot size is 17,360 square feet, in the block bounded on the north by Pine Neck Road, on the east by North Bayview Road, on the south by Oakwood Drive, and on the west by Oakwood D~iv~. Applicant's cottage and garage are located in the northerly portion of the property. It would be an unnecessary hardship to maintain the southerly portion of the property. 2. The hardshipcreatedis UNIQUEond isnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the Applicant's property contains 44,000.square feet and is more than 2~ times the size of the average lot in the block. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the lots created by this division would each contain approximately 22,000 square feet, whereas the average lot is 17,300. Also, each of the new lots would have sub- stantially more than the required 150' minimum road frontage, and the residential character of the area would be maintained substan- tially as it now exists. STATE OF NEW YORK } ) ss COUNTY > Sworn to this ........... ~...-.~..6 ................... day ........................ /~ .................... 19 TO~LD 425 MAIN ST. GREENPORT, L. I., N.Y. 11944 August 27, 1976 To: The Members of the Board of Appeals Re: Area Variances Dear Sirs: You have requested that I advise you with respect to the law to be applied by the Board of Appeals when it considers an application for an area variance. An area variance is to be distinguished from a use variance and the rules to be applied are different with respect to the two types of variances. In a use variance proof of "unnecessary hardship" must be shown, whereas in an area variance case only "practical difficulties" must be shown (Bronxville v. Francis, 1 AD2d 236). In the case of Hoffman v. Harris, 17 NY2d 138, the Court of Appeals rationalized the distinction between an area variance and a use variance in the following language: "There is a good reason for the distinction between use and area variances and the requirement of a higher standard of proof for the former. When the variance is one of area only, there is no change in the character of the zoned district and the neighborhood consider- ations are not so strong. In such a case, it seems fair thai only practical difficulties without unique or special hardship need be proven to obtain a variance." The courts have not specifically defined the term "practical difficulties", however in the case of Wachsberger v. Michalis, 19 Misc. 2d 901, the court enumerated certain matters to be considered as follows: (1) How substantial the variance is in relation to the requirement; (2) The effect, if the variance is allowed, of the increased population density thus produced on available governmental facilities; (3) Whether a substantial change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a substantial detriment to adjoining properties created; (4) Whether the difficulty can be obviated by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue other than a variance; and (5) Whether in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors the interest of justice will be served by allowing the variance. Members of tne Board of Appeals -2- August 27, 1976 In 1967 the Court of Appeals decided the case of Fulling v. Palumbo, 21 NY2d 30, which substantially changed the rules to be applied in area variance cases. In the Fulling case, a landowner sought an area variance to permit the sale of a vacant substandard lot...The landowner acquired the vacant lot and an improved lot adjacent to it at a time when both lots were in compliance with the zoning ordinance which required a minimum lot area of 9, 500 square feet. Thereafter the zoning ordinance was amended to increase the lot size to 12, 000 square feet. The zoning amendment thus caused the vacant lot to become substandard. The owner proved that he paid $5,000 for the lot in question and was offered $11, 000 for it by his neighbors and that if the variance was granted that he could sell it for almost $22, 000. It was also shown that every adjacent lot was less than 9,500 square feet in area and that in the "area" in which the lot was located thirty lots were under 9,500 square feet; twenty-four were from 9, 500 square feet to 10,500 square feet in area; nine were over 10, 500 square feet but less than 12, 000 square feet and only twenty were over 12,000 square feet in area and that the few lots over 12, 000 square feet In area were actually an "island" among substandard lots and that by reason of these circumstances it could not be reasonably argued that the character of the immediate area would be adversely affected by granting the variance. The Court of Appeals directed that a variance be granted and stated the new rule to be as follows: "Where the property owner will suffer significant economic injury by the application of an area standard ordinance, that standard can be justified only by a showing that the public health, safety and wel- fare will be served by upholding the application of the standard and denying the variance." By virtue of the language of the Court In the Fulling case, once an applicant for an area variance proves that the area restriction as applied to his land "imposes sig- nificant economic injury", he must be granted the variance unless the Board of Appeals goes forward with proof that the denial of the variance will "serve the public health, safety and welfare". By reason of the broad language used by the Court in the Fulling case, subsequent court decisions have been concerned mainly with what constitutes "significant economic injury" and what the Board of Appeals must prove to show that "the public health, safety and welfare" requires a denial of the variance. On the question of "significant economic injury", it would appear from the cases that if the applicant can show that he will be able to sell the land in question for substantially more money if granted a variance than if the same is denied, he has met the economic injury test. The question of "public health, safety and welfare" appears to turn on the issue of the character of the neighborhood, i.e. the size of adjacent lots and lots in the immediate neighborhood. The cases seem to indicate that the Board of Appeals will usually be sustained by the courts in denying a variance where it has demonstrated that most of the neighboring lots are substantially larger than the lot in question, or that in a case where a variance has been granted, that the neighboring lots are of Members of thc. ]~oar'd of Appeals -3- August 27, 1976 substantially the same or smaller size than the lot in question. If the Board desires that I go into this question in further detail, I would be happy to meet with the Board at their convenience. Yours very truly~--~ RWT :MY ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, LICENSED BROKE RES: 516 - 477-0230 NORTH ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 27) SOUTHOLD, NEW YOrK 1197~ 516-765-9250 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Attn~ Miss Mary Dawson Dear Miss Dawson, Robert W. Wendell asked me to file the enclosed copies of surveys for him re~ his application to the Board to divide property located at the intersec- tion of Pine Neck Road and North Road to Bayview,Southold, dated July 29, 1976 and granted September 2, 1976. The surveys show the entire parcel and both plots as approved by the board · Thank you. I~ ~ince~e~/, . , Encl, REAL ESTATE SALES. RENTALS, AND APPRAISALS · LISTINGS INVITED JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OF RK c:OUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. 119'71 July 29, 1976 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Re: to: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Application of Robert W. Wendell for a variance-Appeal No. I have on file in my office notification by certified mail Mr. & Mrs. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. &Mrs. 2174 Chester H. Jordan, Pine Neck Road, Southold, N.Y. 11971 William W. Van Zandt, 360 North Bayview Rd.,Southold, N.Y. Keith M. Cowan, Rt.#l, Box 4038, Southold, N.Y. Town Clerk JTT/bn AREAS OF LOTS IN THE BLOCK BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY PINE NECK ROAD, ON THE EAST BY NORTH BAYVIEW ROAD, ON THE SOUTH AND WEST BY OAKW00D DRIVE, SOUTHOLD Suffolk Cty Tax Map # Dimensions Area o7o-13-ol 1 oo x 145 14,5oo 02 131 x 150 19,650 03 50 x 150 (Town of Southold) o4 125 x 15o 18,75o o5 lOO x 15o 15,ooo 06 " 1 5,000 07 " 15,000 08 " 1 5,000 09 " 1 5,000 10 150 x 150 22,500 \ l~ ~t~ 15o x 15o 22,5oo 12 13 95 x 150 14,250 14 95 x 15o 14,25o 15 100 x 150 15,000 1 6 " 1 5,000 17 109 x 150 16,350 18 200 x 150 30,000 AVERAGE SIZE OF PARCEL = 17,360 SQUARE FEET ( 277,750 ~ 16 parcels = 17,360 ) 277,750 BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of : to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold : NOTICE TO: ~r. & Hfs, Chester H. Jordan Pine Neck Road~ Southold~ Ne~ Yo~k 11971 / YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN N~XTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (the following relief: ). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: north by Pine Neck Roads east b~ No~th B~viev Road. south by lind of Van Zandt, year by lind of Cowan and Jo~din, 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A-Re s ~dent iai 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: to divide l~ope~ty. 5. That theorovisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code avolicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are: A~tJ.o].e .~, -~3eotion 100-30 & P~uXk -~dhedule 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publ.ication of such notices; that you or Your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such h'earing. Petitioner ~ . Post Office Address Glen Road~ ~outhold~ Ne~ Yo~k 11 971 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS Hr. & H~so Chester H. Jordan Pine N®ok Road~ ~outheld~ N®~ York 1~ 971 RECEIPT FOR CERT/~IED I~AIL. L.T~¢ (plus postage) ~.0.,.,,~ ~. z,~ ~o~ / / / i~-( ~ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... ~4 SPECIAL DEUVERY (e~r= i~ re~lr~ .................................... PS F=~ NO INSURANCE COVE~GE ~OVlDED~ (See ot~er si~eJ Apr. 1971 38~ NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ~ o~o: ~. o - s*~-~ STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) . residing at IO~L~ Qt~/~ ~. , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~a day of '-~ GL/, ~,~ ,19 '% Lr- , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assess~tent roll ~.~T~)wn of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at -,~"t~ L~'~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (~e1~l~) mail. Sworn to before me this ~,:~)'7L~ day of ~'~. ~. . 19 ..~ --- ~ -- - Notary P~bl~c [ No. 52-Bt25850, Suffolk Coul~ C.~ Term Expires Mar~h 30, 19~f 0' BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of Robex*t We Wendell : to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold : TO: MI', & MrS, William W, Van Zandt .160 North Bayviow Road, 8outhold, Now York 11 971 NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (the following relief: 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: north b7 Pine Nook Rot(lo east; b~' North Ba.Tviow Road, south b~ land of Van Zandt~ and weot b7 land of Cowan and ~o~dan, 3. That the property which is the subiect of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A-Re s idont ial 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: _ool~miasion to divide proportT, .5. That t.he. provisions of the Southold Town Zoflifl~ Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are: Ar~xoze 3, 8eotion 100-30 & Bulk Sonedule 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Post Office Address Glen Road~ Southold, New York 11 971 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS William b/. Van Zandt 360 Noz'th Ba~'vi®w Road~ Southold, New Yol*k 11971 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL--30~ (plus postage) P.O., STATE AND Z~P CODE ' / ' ' /, w th deHvery to addressee only ~ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extro fee requlr~ .................................... PS Fora NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- (See other Apr. 1971 38Q0 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~,,~ day of ~*d~C~ ~ ,19 ~, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof,dlrected to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assef~ment roil of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fice at ~ O ~4,~T~P~ ~ t, C~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (cetlllRLq~d) mail. Sworn to before me this day of ,~ , 19 7~ tLIZAR~TH ANN NEYtLL[ NOTARY pUBLiC S~ate of New Y~ NO. 52.R12§150, Suffolk Ce~ ~elm ~pires March ~, I~ BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of RObert We Wendell to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: and Mrs, Keith Mo Cowan ~ 1, Box ~038, 8outhold~ New York 11971 NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (the following relief: ). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is de.s: cribed as follows: bounded on the north b~ Pine Neck Road~ on the eaet by North BaTview Road, on the south by land of Van Zandt~ and on the wemt by land of Cowan and Jordan. 3. Thattheproperty whichisthesubjectofsuchPetitionislocatedinthefollowingzoningdistrict: A-RESIDENTIAL 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: PeFmie~on tO divide prope~tT. $. That ,heorovisions of the SoutholdTown Z~n~l~lCl?~[:)~l~.l~.~,o the relief sought by the under- signed are: Art~ole 3, aeot~on 100-30 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Post Office Address Glen Road~ 8eutheld~ Hew York NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ADDRESS MI'. & M~,a. K®~th M. Cowan Rt. t~ 1, Box J$O38s ~outhold, New Yo~k RECEIPT FOR CERT)FIED MA~U~,--30¢ P,0,, STATE AND ZIP S0O ,.,,.,, ,," P With delivery to addressee only ........... (plus postage) J POSTMARK OR DATE Apr. 1971 WOO NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED.-- (See other NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL * Gpo: 207, o - ~e~-4e4 STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~ day of '~/~.~ ,19 '~ J~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof,re&dj ed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current a~ssment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fice at ~c~ ~ ~ GL. C7 ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (,-~a:~;~,~t mail. Sworn to before me this day~of ~, 19 ~ . ~ Nota~ Public / ELIZABETH ANN N~WLLE NOTARY PUBLIC, State ef New York SO~/THOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~o~.oF SOUTHOLD Property 'fax Service Agency!v,~L~o~o~ 070 MATCH SEE SEC NO 063 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD 54 75.§ A (UNDERWATER LAND) 20 26.1A(C) ' creek GoOSe SOU / 39 :55 V~ Z~t~C~T