The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2245 TOWN OF SOU~HOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONTNG BOP~vD OF Al'PEALS Appeal No. 2245 Dated January 17, 1977 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Arnold and Diana Gardner Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 1977 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 10, was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) 1977 the appeal 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 7:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) - Decision on Appeal No. 2245, Arnold and Diana Gardner, Nassau Point Ro~d, Cutchogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with existing building. Location of property: west Side Nassau Point Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York; Lots #141 and 142, Map of Nassau Point Properties. 2. YARIA/~CE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because practical difficulties SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by ail properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. F APPEALS ) be denied and After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to set off lot with existing building, west side Nassau Point Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York. The findings of the Board are that the lot to be created would be undersized in a recommended low density area. Two water studies, a general sutdy by Malcolm Pirnie of the Town of Southold in June, 1967, and the Suffolk County Board of Health 1971 survey of Nassau Point in particular, updated to 1975, emphasize the finite nature of the available water supply which is replenished solely by rainfall. In 1975, 80% of the wells showed evidence of salt water intrusion according to the Board of Health letter of March 4, 1977, which indicates that there is no change in the 1975 test results. The creation of such a lot would set a precedent for the division of many lots which are somewhat over 40,000 sq. ft. in Nassau Point but not large enough for two lots. Many single and separate un- developed lots on Nassau Point, some undersized, remain to be de- veloped and should have prior rights to the available water. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will change the char- acter of the neighborhood, and will not observe the spirit of the ordinance. THER~FOR~ IT WAS RESOLVED, Arnold and Diana Gardner, Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York, be DENIED permission to set off lot with existing building, west side Nassau Point Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. RECEIVED AND ...... FILED: Tcv:n Clerk, LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to of the ~ended Building Zone Ordinance New York~ public hearings will be held Appeals at %he Town Office, Main Read, Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Town of Southold, by the Zoning Board of Southold, New York on Thursday, February 17, 1977, on the following appeals: 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Charles Tramantano, i850 Colden Avenue, Bronx County, New York for a special ex- ception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-70 B (3) for permission to operate a used car sales lot. Location of proper%y: south side Main Road, east of Skunk Lane, Cu%chogue, Read (Route 25); east S chau~r~ann. New York, by Horton; bounded on the north by Main south by Her%on; west by 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Arnold and Diana Gardner, Nassau Point Road, Cuqchogue, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with existing building. Location of property: west side Nassau Point Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York; Lots ~141 and 142, Map of Nassau Point Properties. 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of James J. Murphy, 3617 Johns Street, Wantagh, New York for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-118 E for permission to enlarge an existing, non-conforming building. Location of property: north side Horton Lane, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Sound; east by A. Derosa; south by Ho_men Lane Beach; west by Herren Lane Parking Lot. 8:40 P.M. Brown's Hills~ Price, (E.S.T.) upon application of Beatrice East~nan, Sou~hview Drive, Orient, New York (William Jr., Esq. for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Legal Notice -2- Hearings February 17, 1977 Ordinance, Article III~ Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for pezur~ission to construct addition with insufficient setback. Location of property: west side Southview Drive, Orient, New York, bounded on the north by E. DeMaria; east by Southview Drive; south by F. Bondarchuk; west by now or formerly Tuthill and Dyer. 8:50 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of David and Hermine Horton, New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York (Gary Olsen, Esq.) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with existing dwellings. Location of property: south side New Suffolk Avenue and north side Jackson Street~ New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by New Suffolk Aven~e; east by now or formerly Kappel and others; south by Jackson Street; West by Rudeck. ~ny person desiring to be heard on the above appeals should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: February 4, 1977 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, FEBRUARY 10, 1977, A~D FORWARD FIVE (5) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS~ ~MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. Copies mailed to the following on February 4, 1977: Charles A. Tramantano Arnold & Diana Gardner James J. Murphy William Price, Jr., Esq. a/c B. Eastman Gary Olsen, Esq. a/c David & Hermine Horton LEGAL NOqICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York on Thursday, February 17, 1977, on the following appeals: 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Charles Tramantano, 1850 Colden Avenue, Bronx County, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-70 B (3) for per- mission to operate a used car sales lot. Location of property: south side Main Road, east of Skunk Lane, Cutchogun, New York, boanded on the north by Main Road (Route 25); east by Rortun; south by Horton; west by 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon~at~ plication of Arnold and Diana: Gardner, Nassau Point- Road, Cutchogun, New York for a, variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Sehedule for 0ermission to set off lot with existing building. Location of property: west side Nassau Point i Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York; Lots No. 141 and 142, Map of ,.Nassau Point th'operties. 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK. STATE OF NEW YORK. ~ ss: Stuart C. Dorman ...................................... being duly Sworn, says that . .h.e.... is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, ~ news~per publish~ ~ Gr~nporL in said county; and ~u~ the noti~, oi which ~e ~e~d is ~ print~ ~py, ~s ~en published in the s~d Suf~lk W~k~ Times once in each w~k, for one (1) suc~ssively commencing on ~e tenth day of ...~.~r~..: ..... IS 77 .....:. ................. Sw~ to ~ me this ...(.~... ....... ......... .~ ...... ~ ....... LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town I. aw and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordi- nance of ttte Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York on Thursday, February 17, 1977, on the following appeals: 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Charles Tramantano, 1850 Colden Avenue~ Bronx County, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIL Section 100-70 B (3) for petrols~ sio~ ~ Operate a: used ear sales lot. Location of prbperty: south side Main Road, east of Skunk Lane. Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by Main Road (Route 25): east by Horton; south by H0rton; west by Schau- r'-- 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon '~ plication of Arnold and Diam Gardner, Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York for ~ variance in accordance with th~ Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedu for permission to set off lot wi existing building. Location property: west side Nassau Point Road, east side Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New York; Lots #141 and 142, Map of Nassau .._Point Properties. 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of James J. Murphy, 3617 Johns Street, Wantagh, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle Ill, Section 100-118 E for permission to enlarge an existing, non-conforming building. Loca- tion of property: north side Hor- ton Lane, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Sound; east by A. Derosa; south by Horton Lane Beach; west by Horton Lane Parking Lot. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- plication of Beatrice Eastman, Brown's Hills, Southview Drive, Orient. New York (William Price. Jr., Esq.) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordi~ nance. Article IlL Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule For permission to construct addition with insuf- ficient setback. Location of prop- erty: west side Southview Drive, Orient, New York, bounded on the north by E. DeMaria; east by Southview Drive; south by F. Bondarchuk: west by now or formerly Tuthill and Dyer. 8:50 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon ap- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORKl ss: Sherley KarT, being duly sworn, soys that she is an Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southoid, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is o printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for .......... ./. ........................... weeks successively, commencing on the ..... -A.~ .............................. day of ...... ..... , / ........... ................ ,/ Sworn to before me this ........ /. .............. day of ... 7../-./,::, Nof~r7 Public ETHEL PALLADINa NOTARY PUBLIC. Sl=le of New York ~[o 62 4628953 Qualified rn Suffo'.k County Commissien Expires March 30, 1978 FORM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No .................................................................. Dote ............... .~. ...... ./.....~. ........ , 19..~...7 To ........... ~~....~.~ ......... .~..~.~ ..... PLE, ASE TAKE NqTJ4z:E.,that your opplica,ion_~date, cj, .............. ~..~c..~..../....~. ......... , 19...~..7. ....... .~..~__ :~....c~...~ ................ street Mop...~...~....~..~...: ............ Block ..... .)~. .................................. Lot ../...'~..../...~.?..9~...Z~.. ....................... is ................. ~~.~.....~.~.....~.~- ..... .~..~...~=~ ................. Building Inspector(/'· TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. i. (We)A.~old...Cc!:~.i.~k~f~...~.,~r~.~. .............. of :~,s.~fk~.iL~+~..,,k~.~..d. .................................. Name of AppelJa,nt Street ond Number .... .~.~.t..o...h..O~.'~.. ................................................................. ~.e..~..L~?...~. ......... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED ................. WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) Name of Applicant for permit of Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE ~ERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY~Ck~ ~,~I~..,~.~,....~4;.~72¢'~'~.~..~...~. R~, D,.~stt 1000 Street Use District on Zoning Map · .~.,...111 ..................... 1~t..¢¢.,.1&~ .............. Map No. Lot No, section and, Paragraph of t~e Zgning Ordinance by number. Do~ot qu¢te,the Ordi.nonce.) 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (;[iJ~)A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (4~m) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for o variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Vod~nce to Section 280A Subsection (~) A Variance ~e the Zoning Ordinonce ( ) is requested for the reason that Imorn~ (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued ]. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practica~ difficulties or unneces- sary ~ARDSHIP because ~ ~.~ ~ ~ 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and [s not shared by ali properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because ~,,~ ~¢~:~ ~,~ 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because ~ ~4 ...... &~~ ~~ STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY OF~07-~-/~' ) /, j ; .... ~'" Notary Public A variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that the present property ef eno and one-D~lf acres is ~oo extensive to maintain as a private residence. Since it is the intention of the applicants to offer the property for lease, it would be more economically and physically manageable if permission is granted to split off approx- imately eno-half acre {22~585 sq. ft.) as a sep~ate, single residence building plot. Strict application ef the Ordinance would produce diffi~ cutties or up. necessary hard~ip because cf the problem cf realizing, on a lease basis, a fair re~rn on ~nvestment as the property new exists. The granting of the requested variance would enable the appi$o~a~.te to split off and offer for sale a single residence bu~ld~ng lot, one-half acre in size ~ud fronting on Wunneweta Road. The residual property of approx~mateiy one acre (46,950 eqo ft.) which fronts on Nassau Point R~ad could then be offered for lease on a more equitmble basis. The consequent reapportionment of taxes between the indicated properties would offer economic relief in accordance with projected use. The hardship created is unique ~0.d is net shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the majority of the nearby properties are inferior in size to the presently existing property amd several adjacent properties are smaller in total area than the subject lot indicated in the variance request. The variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance ~nd would not change the character of the district because the subject lot described in the request is equal to or larger in area than several other nearby properties and the existing character and image of the district is similar to the applic~ ~nts~ proposed use as a single residence building site. The residence on the resid~l property en Nassau Point Road is set back approximately 150 feet from that Read~ Its status as e single family dwelling would also be maintained. The variance request is in keeping with the principle inherent in ~oning appeals precedure~ that is, to provide individual relie~ in situations where broad changes in zoning laws may cremts specific hardship and inequity. JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, L. I., N. Y. 11971 January 25, 1977 TO: $outhold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Re: Application of Arnold & Diana Gardner-Appeal No. 2245 to: I have on file in my office notification by certified mail Richard Anderson, 333 E. 30th st., N.Y., N.Y. 10016 Arthur John Flynn, 371 Tylebridge Lane, Houston, Texas 77024 ~8'udith T. Terry~ Town Clerk JTT/bn cc:file TELEPHONE 765-3783 NASSAU POINT PRDPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 346 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Southo!d, N.Y. 11935 Gentlemen: [-~-UTmHO~LI~-, L. I., N. Y. 11cJ3.~ October 12,1980 As you will probably recall, members of our Association have often appeared before your Board in the interest of preserving the tenuous water supply on Nassau Point. These appearances have been in connection with subdivision of properties and the installation of swimming pools. In the past the Association itself, while encouraging active participation in these hearings by its members, did not take an official stand. Because of our continuing concern about water and the increase in requests to your Board to allow variances which would further reduce our supply, the Board of Directors of our Association passed a resolution which provides that our Association will officially object to the granting of any variances that will result in any lot being less than one acre~ For this reason, we wish to express our deep concern over the variance reouest at next Thursday's meeting to divide Mr. Baglivi's plot of 1.~ acres into three lots. 1]?e strongly support the present zoning regulation of one acre plots and in spe~ing to my friends and neighbors they have all expressed their fear of any such subdivision and its effect on our ~ater supply and consequent property values. I believe there is strong precedent for your Board to deny this r~quest. In 1977, an application for a variance was made to your Board to aivide a similar lot ( Lot 141 on the Nassau Point map~and then owned by Mr. Arnold Gardner) into les~ than one acre lots a~d your Boa~ wisely denied the request on the baois of our water supply problems. ~e earnestly request that you deny the current application. On the matter of the swimming pool, our Association and a large majority of our members are opposed to the construction of pools because of their effect on our water supply. With beaches and beautiful Peconic Bay within a short distance of any home on the Point, it is hard to understand anyone wanting to mar the landscape with a pool. We also wish to register our protest on this application and hope that you~ deny it. We greatly appreciate the work your Board is doing and we wish to support your efforts to enforce the Zoning Code and the beauty and health of this area. V~truly~urs, W. S. Gardh~, President ~'COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY C. McLAUGHLIN, M.D,, M,P,H. March 2, 1977 MAR 4 REC'O Ms. Mary E. Dawson, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Dawson: Your letter of 2/28/77 to Mr. Robert Villa of this office has been referred to me. The Department of Health Services has conducted several surveys of the Nassau Point area, the most detailed of which resulted in the 1971 report which we have enclosed for your reference. ! have also enclosed a copy of the most recent samplings performed in 1975. While no statistical comparison can be drawn between these samples and those summarized in the survey report, the results do demonstrate that the same basic quality problems still persist. The conclusions drawn in the 1971 report therefore are still pertinent. One point of clarification should be made with respect to the most recent samples. The analysis for these samples was expanded to in- clude copper and zinc. The presence of copper and zinc indicates the occurrence of corrosion of copper and galvanized piping, respectively. Such corrosion is, in turn, due to the natural acidity of Long Island ground water. The presence of these corrosion products are not thought to represent a health hazard, although aesthetic effects may occur. Should you have any questions, or feel free to contact this office. PJP/vg Enc. cc: Mr. Villa if we Ass't may be of further assistance, .~uro ~,~ Health Engineer C) · · HEHPSTEAD NY 11S50 Lu u M itlgram' taestem union ~-Oe~lbbEUe8 03/09/77 It8 IPMMTZZ ¢$P NYA8 51~BlS~bO MGM TDMT MEMPSTEAD NY tOO 03-Oq 1007P EST 80UTMOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAL SOUTMOLD Ny 11971 ~AR 1~ RI~C'B C C C GENTLEMEN I OBJECT TO THE REZONING OF PROPERTY TO POINT AS [ OWN THE ABUTTING PROPERTY EDWARD d OIEKMANN 65a IRENE ST HEMPSTEAD Ny 11550 ZZIoB EST MGMCOMP M~M HALF ACRE ZONING ON NASSAU 0 '0 So thold Town Board of Appeals _qr'IUTHr'ILD, L. I., N.Y. 11971 Telephone 765-c~660 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert ~Y./. Gillispie, Jr., Chairmen Robert Bergen Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. February 28, 1977 Mr. Robert Villa Suffolk County Department of Health County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Villa: It has recently come to our attention that the General Engineering Unit of the Health Department has, in the past, conducted studies of the water supply on Nassau Point, Cutchogue. There is now an application before the Board in which this type of information would be most helpful. Therefore, please send us any studies or other information you have pertaining to the water situation on Nassau Point. Your assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Ve~ truly yours, Mar~/E. Dawson Secretary Sampl es 20 Determi nation Chlorides 20 Detergent 13 Constitutent MBAS Chloride Nitrate Iron -6- Nitrate 13 Iron 13 Aliuno n i a 13 pH 20 Range ,',~ Of Samples Within Range * O.1 mg/1 95 O,1 -0.5 5 0-20 20.0 20-40 30.0 250 or greater 0 lO0.O 10 or greater 5 0-0.3 77 0.3 or greater 23 * indicates less than Only one shallow well appeared to be receiving deirect cesspool leach- ings. There was no evidence of detergent in the aquifer except in the aforementioned case. F~.f,j;.~._percent of.~.he w~lls ,~ample~howed varying degrees of salt water intrusion. The chloride concentrations indicating possible intrusion were not found in a specific concentrations were found in geographical area although the higher the areas closer to the salt water bodies except for the east bluff. It is obvious that there is a tenuous balance in the area between the salt and fresh watar. Certainly a~ny 1-~rge withdrawals will havre ~rastic eff~. The one case of nitrate concentration exceeding st'andards was caused by cesspool leaching. The generally low concentrations can be attributed to seasonal population -7- fluctuation and the samll percentage of land receiving fertilizers. The iron concentrations in excess of standards were probably caused by well inactivity, plu~nbing or the well casing.s. Conclusions 1. Nassau ground Point has a limited quantity of fresh water in under- storage due to tile salt water of _~he Bay's existing belo~'~ the peninsula. The only source of rJial~ of ~he fresh ground water is by natural ~of which only about one half. finds .it way into the water-table by the inflitration process. '3. Chemical analyses (chlorides) indicated that~a__]_l~ wate_r_ intrusion is evident in 50% of the.wells surveyed while an additional 30% had chloride levels in which differelt~atie'l between salt intrusion and cesspool pollution could not be actually determined. Eighty percent of the homes are thus experiencing chloride levels in their water supply greater '{han normal accepted ground water concentrations although none exceeded drinking water standards. 4. Th~ rat~e~o~salt water in~ru~g~ tab,~lishPH M~t ~he rate will be a function of development, .~opulation qrowth, ground water withdrawal and the amount of natural precipitation. Another ~t with the resultant lowering of the ground water table will further aggrevate the fresh salt water balance and increase the rate of ground water deterioation. Recommendations 1. Es~tablish~low c~ensit~zonino in ~the arma. o Prevent any dredging of the shoreline If the condition of the ground water shows deterioation, a central water supply for_t_b~¢_ penin~.a should be established to provide managelaent of the resource. Controlled move- ment of the salt water interface could thus be achieved. 4. The feasibility of connecting to a central mainland public supply should be studied. Prepared by: James Hell, P.E. Water Quality Section O O BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of Arnold and Diana Gardner to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: Mr. Richard Anderson 333 East 30th Street Hew York, N.Y. 10016 NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) ~I~K(~JI(I~J~IXI~I~II~I~~~: '). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows:In District 1OO0. that westerly portion of lot 151 & 1~2 which fronts on Wunneweta Road and extends easterly to a distance of 137.10 ~'ee~ on ~ne nor:nam oounaary ana 16o.o z'ee~ on ~ne southern bouncary. 3. Thattheproperty whichlsthesubjectofsuchPetitionisl~atedinthefollowingzoningdistrict: District 1000, Section 111, Lot # 1~1 & 1~2 4. That~ysuchPetition~heundersigned willrequestthefollowingrelief~ez~n:l, eSiOn to solit off approxzmately one half acre of the prope~y facing ~unneweta Road and to offer it for sale as a single residence building lot. .5. That the gJ'.oy, isions of the Southold Town Z(~ing Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are: Art;, '.Li~L, Section 100-30 & Bulk :Schedule 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New york and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of sugh hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of $outhold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. , ~ ~ ~ Petition~ .Diana G. Ga~er Arnold D, Gardner ~$tOffice Addr~s · BoxY03, Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, N.Y., 11935 O O NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL STREET ANO ".0. STATE PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PDOVIDED-- (See ofher ad.) .Jan. 16763800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ,A. GPo: 1675~1,-,152 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SENT TO ~ POSTMARK OPTIONAL SE"VICES tOR ADpITI~NAL FJ ~S PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- Jan. 197'63800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OFSUFFOLK) SS.: Arnold Gardner , residing at Nassau Point Road Cutchogue r N.Y. , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~ day of January ,19 77 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at C1-i{-t-~ho~f~'11~; lq _¥_ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this 2 5 th day of January ,1~9 ~77 U Notary Public / ELIZAB~H A~'~N NEVILLE NOTARY PUBLIC, State of i'tew York No. 52.8125850, Sufiolk ~ ~ 2.9A(c )~. J I.TA(c) ~./ 1.6A(c) /~' L25A{¢) L6A (c~) ~- ~, 13A~1 ?,,6 26 $0 SEE PARCEL NO. SEC. NO. 118-01-011 MATCH LrNE 3.4A (c) 2.6 A (c,~) ~- ~'/ ~ 1.8A(c)/ / 34 / I..4A(c) 2.7A(¢ '- ~'vi sions KEY ~AP ~7~ (~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ,,~7~- ! .__ ,1'o4 ~.oo, o 20° 4oo_. Real Property Tax Service Ag 10; H. Russell Haose, Director -:~i. ---- i"'l , Riverhead, L. I, New York