Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2397 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONinG BOAteD OF A~PEAL$ Appeal No. 2397 Dated March 3, 1978 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TO~ OF SOUTHOLD To Angelo Francis Corva (Richard Lark, Esq.) 159 Great Neck Road Great Neck, NY DATE .M.9:.~qh......23, 1978 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 23, was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Bequest for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance ~ ) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) 1978 the appeal I. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Axtiele .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage. Location of property: Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York; Lot #54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because SEE REVERSE practical difficulties or unnecessary (b) The hardship created (is) (i~ not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested vartanee( ) be granted ( that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ) be denied and After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New York a/c Dr. Simkin be GRANTED permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York, Lot #54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. DATE '--/-/q-7~ HOUR ~rk, Town of Southold After investigation and inspection, the Baard finds that the applicant requests permission to construct ~lwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York. The findings of the Board are that the'Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that'strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New York a/c Dr. Simkin be GRANTED permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York, Lot %54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. -2- Hearings: March 23, 1978 Legal Notice of property: South side Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue, New York; Lots #189 and 190, Amended Map "A" of Nassau Point Properties, Filed Map ~156. 8:35 P.M. (E.S.T.) Recessed hearing upon application of Appolonia Kirchgessner, Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, New York (Abigail Wickham, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area. Location of property: Right-of-way east side Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by now or for- merly R. Tuthill; east by now or formerly J. Peters; south by right-of-way; west by now or formerly P. Groben. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of P.B.M. Associates, Inc., Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York, and the Southold Savings Bank, Main Road, $outhold, New York (Richard Lark, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width. Location of property: East side Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Railroad; east by F. Rich; south by Eiseman; west by ~oungs Avenue. ~' 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Angelo Francis Corva 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck,. New York (Richard Lark, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage. Location of property:' Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York; Lot $54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650. Any person desiring to be heard on the above appeals should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: March 10, 1978 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provi- sions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. on Thurs- day, March 23, 1978, on the following appeals: 7:55 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Patrick Edward and Linda Martz Lyons. Main Road, Orient, New York (George Stankevich, Attorney) for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-118D for permission to reinstate non-conforming, two -family use. Location of pro- perty: North side Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded on the north by D. Rose; east by Finkle; south by Main Road; west by D. Moore. 8:05 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of charles A. Bolsch, 30 Roosevelt Street, Little Valley, New Jersey (Gary Olsen, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Town Law, Section 280A for approval of access. Loca- tion of property: Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York, bounded on the north by W. divide property with insuffi- cient width. Location of pro- perry: East~ide Youngs Av- enue, Southo~d, New York, bounded on the~orth by Long Island Railroad; east by F. upon' appUcatmn of Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New YOrk (Rich- ard Lark, Attorney) for a the Zoning Ordinance, Article I11, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct dwelling exceeding tion of property: Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York; Lot #54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650. Any persons desiring to be heard on the above appeals place above specified. Dated: March 10, ~978 BY ORDER OF THE g~i=i~i~D TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1T-3 / 16(388) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspoper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the onnexed is o printed copy, hos been published in soid Long. Island Tmveler-Watch- mon once each week for ........... ~ ............................ weeks successively, commencing on the ................. .................. : .......... Sworn to before rna thi~ .../..../. ............... akly ot Groben. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon plication of P.B.M. Associates, Inc., Boissoau Avenue, Southold, New York, and the Southold Savings Bark, Main Road, Seuthold, New York (Richard Lark, Attorney) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 10~-71 and Bulk Schedule for permission to dividc property with insufficient width. Location of property: East side Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Long Island Railroad; east by F. Rich; south by FAseman; west by Youngs Avenue. g 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon plication of Angelo Franci Corva, 159 Great Neck Roa~ Groat Neck, New York (Richar~ Lark, Attorney) for a variance i: accordance with the Zonin Ordinance, Article III, Sectio: 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct dwellin~ exceeding maximum loi coverage. Location of property: Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York; Lot No. 54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map No. 4650. Any person desiring to be heard on the above appeals should appear at t~e time and place above specified. Dated: March 10, 1978 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1TM16-2936 FORM NO. 3 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL. ~ 3 ~ 7 ~at ............................ ~.../..7-..,, File No ...................... ~ ............................................ · · "¥'/ ................................. x' ......... ,:.~}; .......... ........... · /_4....~,~,,.~z....~..../2Z~..~...~..~.~: ,~,-,~,' PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated .............................. for permit to construct .~ .......... .~. ................. at the premises located at ...... ..ff~.~-.......~...~.{.:t(~''L- Map ............ .~....~.....'~.....Q ....... Block ............................................ Lot ....~.....~.. ................................ is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds ....... .~...:.....~D~m,~.d. .:~.,d(:.~:~: ......... ,z~...c~,¢.~,E.:...~ ......... ~....c.:./.o. ........ ~.,,:,,..~...~..~.z.~..~.---- .~.~..,.~,.z.-- ....................................................................................................... : ........ ./..... ........... Building Inspector O TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING iNSPECTOR APPEAL NO. c~ ~ ~ 7 DATE ....... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (~) A...n..g..e..1..o.....F..r...a...n..c..'.z..s.....C..o..r...v..a.. .................. of ..1._5..9.....G...r.f~.,t....k~.e..g..k.....R.p.~.d. ............................. Name of Appellont Street and Number Great Neck New York HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD Of APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED ~'~ WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Name of Applicant for permit of ...Z...5..9.....G..r...e..a...% ........ .G..r...e. ............... ........... Street and Number Municipality State ) PERMIT TO USE ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (X) PERMIT TO BUILD 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .~..~...'9:cJ...~..~..b...°..r,..,.~..9.~,d.. ......... .'[..~.,'~...~.e.~..i~.e..D.t,..J:.a.!....D.~..t:.~...ict Street Use District on Zoning Mop Map of Cleaves Point, Section 3 ..... ....................................... .................. Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Parograph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III~ Section 100-31 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (Store of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. ~6 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (t';~) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such ~ppeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ) ,s requested for the reason that present zoning allows building lot coverage up to 20% of the lot area, whereas it is requested to erect a one-family home on the property containing 22.8% of lot coverage. Form zs! (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficultiesorunneces- sary HARDSHIPbecause due to the unusual configuration of Lot 54 and its proximity to Gull Pond and Dawn Lagoon, it is not practical to build a house with a frontal elevation in keeping with the neighborhood. Your petitioner has designed an L-shaped house in order to accomplish that objective. A standard rectangle or square dwelling would not be possible on a parcel of this shape if such a frontal~evation is desired. Such a design would have eliminated the need for a considerable amount of extra space, such as long hallways, which are inherent in the present plan which is causing the need for this application. However, a standard rectangle or square dwelling would not properly utilize this particular lot and would present practical difficulties. Dr. and Mrs. Simkin had several architectural studies, and spent considerable time and effort to determine the most practical solution to building a dwelling on this particular par- cel. As a result of this process, the proposed plan evolved as the most appropriate design to harmonize with the neighborhood and properly utilize this property. Further, to reduce the size of the home would detract from its architectural integrity. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 are Drawings A-2 through A-7 prepared by Angelo Francis Corva & Associates. 2. The hordshipcreatedis UNIQUEond isnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity ofthisproperty andin this use district becouse this is the only lot on the sub- division which has this particular irregular shape, and due to the lot size it is required to build an irregularly shaped house to take advantage of lot area, all as shown on the Site Plan - Simkin Residence with Area Calculations, prepared by Angelo Francis Corva & Associates on 12-22-77, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 2.(Sheet A-l). 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because when the filed map of "Map of Cleaves Point, Section 3" was approved by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold on May 3, 1966, the minimum lot size was 12,500 square feet. The requested variance is small and granting of it will not have any effect on this neighborhood. This lot contains 14,647 square feet and at that time the front yard requirements were 35 feet, the rear yard 25 feet, and the per- missible building area was 25% which would allow a dwelling of 3,661.75 square feet. The proposed building consists of 3,344.42 square feet or 22.8% of the lot coverage. In all other respects the application for a building permit conforms to the zoning at the time the map was filed. The present zoning which, with the exception of lot coverage, is the same today because of the provisions of Section 100-12 of the Zoning Ordinance, which exempt this particular filed map from the lot area and lot width requirements. The proposed residence will be in keeping with the neigh- borhood, and the variance request is only for an additior~al 415.02~quare feet of residential building area, thereby n preventin the ory~y an reasonable use of adjacent propertieS.CoUNTySTATE OF OF NEW SUFFOLK YORK ))) ss .................. i~i~or.. .... ./~~ y and A~lo Francis Corva Sworn to this .............. .1...5..~..h. ...................... day of .......... ~F.~.~P~A'~!L .......................... 1978 I,;A3Y L0"J DOROSKI // The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED, P.B.M. Associates, Inc., Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York, and the Southold Savings Bank, Main Road, Southold, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with insufficient width, east side Youngs Avenue (Railroad Avenue), Southold, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2397 - 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of. Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neok, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for Southold Town Board of Appeals -30- March 23, THE CHAIRMAN: No, I think Mr. Lark discussed that. 1978 RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: I think she might have missed that. What they call Settler's Village, the barn that's being used primarily for storage will be torn down. THE CHAIRMAN: The old I.M. Young building is going to disappear. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: Right, that's correct. SHIRLEY BACHRACH: There will then no longer be a Haystack. THE CHAIRMAN: I don't know what they call it now, it used to be the I. M. Young building. That's going to be demolished and the whole 100' by 400' or whatever it is will be blacktopped with drainage. Any other questions? Anyone wish to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicants request permission to divide property with insufficient width, east side Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED, P.B.M. Associates, Inc., Boisseau Avenue, Southold, N~w York, and the Southold Savings Bank, Main Road, Southold, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with insufficient width, east side Youngs Avenue (Railroad Avenue), Southold, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: 'Maimone. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2397 - 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.) upon application of Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, $outhold Town Board of Appeals -31- March 23, 1978 permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage. Location of property: Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York; Lot #54, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Helmer Kent; Rhoda Weston. Fee paid - $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The site plan of this lot indicates the difficulties that exist in locating a house the size of this one. The front yard toward Snug Harbor Road is, it straddles a sharp change of direction on Snug Harbor Road so that it has two di- mensions, one is 37' and the other looks like about 10', 10.69 I guess. The proposal is to locate the house, which is irregularly shaped, 35' from Snug Harbor Road and 15' from the northerly boundary of the property and 10' from the southerly boundary of the property and approximately 25' from Gull Pond. A little fur- ther from Dawn Lagoon. The house fits all of the original zoning yard requirements. It is the unusual shape caused by the original development which was maximizing the number of lots which could be obtained. It's in an area of similarly sized lots. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: The petition pretty much lays out the position of the applicant, I won't belabor the point. However, there's a few things I would like to add. Has the Board viewed the property? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, I've seen it a number of times. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: I did obtain from van Tuyl's office a copy of this particular filed map, Section III of Cleaves Point. The lot we're talking about here is Lot #54 and, as I stated, it is an application for an area variance and I want to cover some of the practical difficulties there. As the Board can see looking at Lot #54 on ~_his map of Cleaves Point, Section III, it is unique in its shape and location. I think in fairness, as the Chairman stated, there was probably a maximization at the time of trying to get the maximum yield there, and this lot kind of got snuck in at that sharp course in the road. So we don't haye a conventional rectangular lot like the majority of the lots that are on that map. We only have 48' on Snug Harbor which is chopped up in a 10' section and the balance being in a 37' section rather than the standard 100' which was the standard at that time for the subdivision and for the rest of'the lots in the subdivision. Yet, we have a rear yard approximately 160' which is currently, you might say the intersectiom, of Gull Pond and that dredged out Dawn Lagoon there, and it is bulkheaded. The side yards, because they go out on various angles, Southold Town Board of Appeals -32- March 23, 1978 makes it irregular so you can't really describe it other than by saying it's an irregularly shaped piece. I don't think there's any question when you look at that lot in relationship with the other ones that it is unique due to its location on the intersection of Gull Pond and Dawn Lagoon and due to its oddball shape. On account of these features, as I stated, a standard, rectangular or square house would not be suitable from the economic point of view taking into consideration land values and certainly not taking into consideration the aesthetic standpoint as to what could be done with the property. Realizing this and being sensitive, meticulous type people, Dr. and Mrs. Simkin engaged an architect to help design a house which would be in keeping with their living requirements but would also blend in with the area and would utilize this particu- lar lot to its best advantage. The result is the reason why I'm here, because the house that was designed and redesigned I might add, as the architect will tell you in a couple of minutes, is still greater than would be permitted under the current Zoning Ordinance. In con- sidering practical difficulties I believe the Board has to take the following matters into consideration, the first one being, how sub- stantial is the variance, in relation with the requirement which is being sought to have relief from. I submit it is very small because the lot area is 14,647 sq. ft. and, although this is a substandard lot today, it wasn't substandard in 1966 when the map was approved because we had, at that time, only a 12,500 sq. ft. requirement. Due to later amendments, our Zoning Ordinance is the present 40,000 ~ sq. ft. ~owever, as I pointed out, that Section 100-112 of the amended Zoning Ordinance exempts this subdivision from both the lot area and width requirements. It is my.understanding that the side and rear yards, as being applied for, do comply with the standards as applied to this subdivision. You will note that on Exhibit 2 the proposed dwelling on this application, as I said, does comply with all these requirements the way the architect has it laid out. However, the exception for lot coverage for the building was not exempted, for some strange reason, and at that time under the old zoning Ordinance in 1966 we had 25% lot coverage. THE CHAIRMAN: ~ould you repeat that? It was not accepted, you said? RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: The lot coverage, the area that you're allowed to have a. b~'ilding on, was not excepted when the amendments went through for this subdivision, only lot width and area. The area got upgraded, or down, however you want to look at it, it used to be 25%, you could build a home up to 25% of your area and now you can only build one of 20%. With the 25%, back in 1966, a house'of 3,661 sq. ft. could be built but today, with only the 20% requirement, you're only allowed a house of 2,929, without a variance which is ~he reason we're here. In essence, the applicatio~ boils down, we're asking the Board for an additional 415.02 sq. ft. to be built on this lot. When all is said and done, that's what it boils down to in numbers. I say the requirement is small because, under the prior Ordinance it was, the proposed house was 317' under Southold Town Board of Appeals -33- March 23, 1978 the permissible coverage whereas, as I said, today it would be 415' over. The next requirement that I believe you have to con- sider in an application of this kind is the effect that the variance is allowed on increased population density which, woUld thus produce an effect on available governmental facilities. I submit that this application, there is no effect. Reason: re- gardless of the size or the shape of the home, whether it's 850 sq. ft. or 4,000 sq. ft., you're still only going to have a one- family dwelling on the lot. The next thing I think you have.~to take into consideration is whether this variance will result in a substantial, whether a change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood, or a substantial detriment to adjoining properties will be created. I submit, again, there will be none. Rather, it will tend to upgrade the property values as the cost of this, we're all aware of the present construction costs and it's going to be quite substantial, the cost of an improvement of this nature. As I understand it, the house will fit in. It's going to have natural cedar shingle roof which the architect will fill you in on in a moment with natural cedar siding with some white trim. In essence it's going to be a simple and a clean design and I think it will blend in nicely, especially taking into consideration the lot. I think the next thing you have to consider is whether the difficulty can be obviated by some method feasible for the appli- cant to pursue other than a variance. I'think, to be quite candid, the obvious.answer there is to build a smaller house.' I'm going to defer to the architect to tell you the reasons that he found that he could not build a smaller house because, as I understand it, if he does it destroys the architectural integrity of what he's set out to do here. Finally, I think taking all these factors into consideration and considering the unique location of this property and the particular area on the waterfront, whether the interests of justice will be served by allowing the owner to build'the house he proposes. I submit, for the reasons given in the application and since the Board has viewed the property and the area.and the proposed site plan which you have before you, that the interests of justice and the integrity of the Ordinance · will be served by granting tbs application. I'd like to have Mr. Corva just briefly explain how he got involved with building such a house on this lot because it is a little unique, there's a lot of features on here that I think the Board should be aware of and then I think he can answer any questions and certainly, if he can't, Dr. Simkin can. THE CHAIRMAN: project ... it was reduced 'it. I think Howard Terry spoke to me about this a much larger house, I believe, they've already RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: Yes, that's correct. Southold Town Board of Appeals -34- March 23, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: He asked me my informal opinion and I thought it was too large for the Board to approve. I presume this is the result of reducing the area? ANGELO F. CORVA: Yes, sir. We have been working on it and we finally came to a size which was compatable to the property, we felt, and compatable to the owners of the property. Dr. and Mrs. Simkin happen to be very, very meticulous people in everything they do. We sat for many, many months, as a matter of fact it's over a year now since my commission was engaged, and we have come to a solution which they feel they can live with along the lines of their standards of living and one that would be compatable with the prop- erty which, as Mr. Lark said, was one that does create great hardship because of its uniqueness, it~. very small frontage, its very ex- pansive frontage on Gull Pond and the Canal. We have worked very tightly in working along the lines of all the side yard requirements, rear yard requirements and front yard requirements. Unfortunately, the shape of the property has led us to this L-shaped house which has created a bit more square footage than a normal-type house but as, again as Mr. Lark said, a normal-type frontal elevation house wouldn't really be accommodated, easily accommodated on this site due to its narrowness in the front. THE CHAIRMAN: Is this going to ahve a cellar in it or will this be slab-type construction? ANGELO F. CORVA: It will have a cellar under it. THE CHAIRMAN: Are you going to get it started pretty soon? ANGELO F. CORVA: Hopefully, yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Before they get this flood plain in? Because if you had to build this house under the flood plain conditions you'd have to have the floor of the cellar up 8' above mean high tide there. That would make a very grotesque-looking apparition and I think you should get it started. ANGELO F. CORVA: I wouldn't permit my client to build such a grotesque-looking house. THE CHAIRMAN: I think that covers it, this is only 2%, slightly more than 2%, and actually it's very rare, I can't recall a single case where we've had, this type of application where somebody needed more than ... in the old smaller lots, you had 25% as Mr. Lark pointed out. As the lots got bigger they reduced the size, and this 20% really isn't applicable to this size lot. Under the old system, as you said, you could have used it. So this is an area variance which is far less serious than a use variance, of course. Any other questions? Anybody wish to speak against this application? HELMER KENT: I'm the adjoining property owner to the south. In the plans as-they are now submitted I have no objection to the Southold Town Board of Appeals -35- March 23, 1978 larger area. However, on the south side of the building, you inquired about the cellar. The plans show sliding doors which would necessitate the foundation being open on the south side adjoining my property. THE CHAIRMAN: You're on the south side, that's toward the Bay. HELMER KENT: Yes, towards the Bay. THE CHAIRMAN: You're not toward the Club, you're toward the Bay. HELMER KENT: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Have you seen the way the house is located on here, I don't whether you've seen this plan or not. HELMER KENT: Yes, I've seen this plan. I'm the adjoining property here (referring to map). On this area here Mr. Simkin proposes to have sliding doors.. Now that would come right up to within 10' of my property. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: I thought they were flush with the house, aren't they? HELMER KENT: Well, if they're in the basement then you naturally have an opening out there that will be flush to the footings, the cellar floor. THE CHAIRMAN: You're going to have glass in the basement facing the water toward the lagoon? ANGELO F. CORVA: There are glass doors. THE CHAIRMAN: In the basement? ANGELO F. CORVA: On that level, yes. THE CHAIRMAN: It's a split level. ANGELO F. CORVA: No, it's not. THE CHAIRMAN: But you are going to utilize the basement? ANGELO Fo CORVA: The property now has a natural slope to the back and we are by no means going to be going any lower than what the property is now. We will be working within the contour of the property. HELMER KENT: Mr. Simkin assures me he's going to build on the same level as my house. Southold Town Board of Appeals -36- March 23, 1978 ANGELO F. CORVA: As far as the first floor is concerned, yes. HEAMER KENT: Now, if he has a basement that requires sliding doors, they.will naturally have to be 6' or 7' lower. He proposes, according to the plans, you've drawn the plans, a trench outside of those doors. ANGELO F. CORVA: We would have to be able to exit out of those doors, but as far as a trench being built there, I don't think we can refer to it as a "trench." HELMER KENT: It would be an excavation, wouldn't it? ANGELO. F..CORVA: There will be some sort of excavation, yes. What is your objection, I don't follow. HELMER KENT: It would leave a hole alongside, only 10' from my property that would go down 7' or 8' below my level. ANGELO F. CORVA: I don't think there's that much, sir. THE CHAIRMAN: I think your prgperty is higher than this property. HELMER KENT: But Dr. Simkin expects to fill the property up to the level of my property. ANGELO F. CORVA: I think the statement you made before, Dr. Simkin plans to build the first floor in the same line as your property to have the house up matching yours. But his property is lower than your property now and we are by no means excavating any tremendour amount of earth to create any sort of ... HELMER KENT: It is much lower now and you are proposing to have a basement so it will be still lower. You know the conditions there. As it is, the property there now is only 3' above high water. THE CHAIRMAN: Don't you think, Mr. Kent, that that's their problem? HELMER KENT: Yes, it is, but it would also cause a problem for me. I would have a bank. For the 10 years that I've been in the house there's been a bank going down to this property up until a couple of years ago. Mr. Kaplan, that was the former owner, filled it. THE CHAIRMAN:. It seems to me that this would strengthen your bank because if they're going to put a lower level in this house, they'll have to have seven or eight feet of concrete wall for this whole distance 10' away from you, which would strengthen your bank. Southold Town Board of Appeals -37- March 23, 1978 HELMER KENT: THE CHAIRMAN: front here, too. HELMER KENT: They would have to put a 10' wall down ... Something like that would have to go down in It would have to go out near the property line. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: .There's no doors here, are there? (on map) ANGELO F. CORVA: No, there are no doors there. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: Point that out to him because I think he's confused. ANGELO F. CORVA: The doors aren't along here, sir. The doors that you were talking about are along this area here. HELMER KENT: Oh, you're not going ~o have them here on this side? ANGELO F~.. CORVA: Oh, no. about because, if anything, Dr. because your house is too high. I wasn't sure what you were talking Simkin should have a complaint RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: In other words, there's going to be nothing over here, the doors will be out over in this area. ANGELO F. CORVA: Which is about 20', 25' away. This will be naturally graded land. HELMER KENT: That will be the legal 10' from the line then. ANGELO F. CORVA: Has to be. HELMER KENT: There will be no encumbrances otherwise then. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: No. HELMER KENT: Well, that's OK. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: Good, I'm glad we got that clarified. THE CHAIRMAN: Thanks, we didn't understand it either. About the garage, is this garage going to be on the basement level or the ... ANGEL~ F. CORVA: No, I forget the elevation with regard to the street but I believe it will be just a couple of inches higher than street level so we don't have any problems with water coming in. THE CHAIRMAN: I have one like that, my garage is the same level as my first floor. Southold Town Board of Appeals -38- ANGELO F. CORVA: No, the garage, I believe March 23, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: This is going to the the same level as your first floor. ANGELO F. CORVA: As the first floor, two or three risers below, yes. THE CHAIRMAN: You'll have cellar underneath it? ANGELO F. CORVA: Not under the garage. THE CHAIRMAN: So that will be a slab there? ANGELO F. CORVA: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Any other questions? JOHN HUGHES: I have an objection. My name is John Hughes, I live on Dawn Drive. I'm to the rear adjacent to this particular piece of property that's going to be improved. THE CHAIRMAN: You're adjacent to it? JOHN HUGHES: To the rear and adjacent, I'm Lot 69 on Dawn Drive. As you probably know, Cleaves Point Subdivision was p6t together by Mr. Kaplan of Dawn Realty Corporation down in Centereach. THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, I bought a lot from him. JOHN HUGHES: At that time, Section III had a Declaration of Record that was filed in Riverhead which said that no house could be built closer than 50' to the water. Every homeowner that's built out there has had to maintain 50' from the rear of the house %o the water. The last lot that was sold, which happens to be this lot, Mr. Kaplan then turned around and waivered the 50' requirement so that now this house goes 25' from the water~ That, in my judgement, has caused a aggrevation and a concern to the homeowners in that area. Therefore, I feel that the Planning Board approving an additional square footage for the house is going to further aggrevate that situation. Now, whether the lot is irregular or not, the man bought an irregular lot, he knew that when he purchased it. I'm quite sure that there's a house, without going beyond the requirements of the Town, that can be constructed on there without this variance. All this variance does is put him closer to the water and, therefore, does not conform with any other homes in that subdivision. So, inasmuch as Mr. Kaplan sold the homeowners down the river by giving out this one variance, I don't think it should be aggrevated by this Board, further aggrevated. Southold Town Board of Appeals -39- March 23, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: Well, what Mr. Kaplan did on his own deed restrictions or even if he had the power to do it ... JOHN HUGHES: I realize that, I realize it's not a Town ordinance but I'm also saying there was a Declaration of Record on file in Riverhead which was imposed on every lot owner out there except this one. Therefore, it does have an impact on the surrounding homes. THE CHAIRMAN: How could he escape it? JOHN HUGHES: Build a smaller home. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: As I understand it, when Dr. Simkin bought the property from the Kaplans that Kaplan did reserve himself the right, in his covenants and restrictions, to amend them at any time. As I understand it, after talking to Dr. Simkin who can address himself on the point, this lot was unique in that it fronted both ... if you'll notice in Section III, those that are waterfront lots are all on this dredged out canal, Dawn Lagoon. This lot here is also on Gull Pond. Kaplan amended the covenants and restrictions to waiver that requirement since it was on that, and Dr. Simkin did buy it with the amended covenants and restrictions which allowed him to build closer to conform to Zoning which, of course, is 25' for this particular subdivision for a rear lot. Dr. Simkin was aware of it and, when he purchased it, he was aware that he could build up t6 25'. THE CHAIRMA/q: It looks to me as though this, you say he waived it on Lot #54? RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: That's the lot that Dr. Simkin owns, 54. THE CHAIRMAN: ~nd this one? RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: No, I don't know anything about 59, just on 54 as I understand it because it was on the pond also not, per se, on the dredged creek there or the lagoon. JOHN HUGHES: That, to me, is still part of Section III and Section III had the Declaration of Record and that said all the homes will be built 50' from the water. Every home in that sub- division was built 50' from the water. When he sold the last lot he allowed them to turn around and got within 25' of the water. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: He had the power to do that, though. JOHN HUGHES: I'm saying whether he had the power or not, saying that I don't want the Board to further aggrevate a bad situation by approving this variance. I'm Southold Town Board of Appeals -40- March 23, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: I think that one of the points that should be made here is that without, I was unaware of Mr. Kaplan's 50' restriction. We're generally not aware of subdivision restrictions. The house could have been built with these side yards,~rear yards and front yards under the original Zoning Ordinance of the Town. I assume that his idea in granting this reduction is that it's very difficult to locate a house 50' back into a narrow lot. As you go back further you narrow the lot so that any Zoning inter- pretation, any Board of Appeals, I think would tend to sympathize with that problem when it came up. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: Also, Dr. Simkin could build an 850 sq. ft. house right along 25' off the rear line, off the bulkhead line, and wouldn't have to apply for a variance. JOHN HUGHES: It'd be pretty had to meet the front yard, front line 35' setback. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: He'd be more than 35', he'd probably be 40' or 50' JOHN HUGHES: Once the precedent has been established as far as setback it has to be met by all homes. RICHARD LARK, ESQ.: No, it can't be closer than that, it can always be further back. THE CHAIRMAN: That's right. Anyone else wish to speak? (There was no response.) Well, with all sympathy to the objection that was just made I think it's beyond the Board of Appeals' power to enforce what Mr. Kaplan does with private property. It's appropriate for this Board to offer a resolution granting this application as applied for and agreeing with the reasoning of the applicant, with due respect to the points that have been made here. I'll offer such a resolution. After investigation and inspection, the Board finds~that the applicant requests permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York. The findings of the Board are that the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. Southold Town Board of Appeals -41- March 23, 1978 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Angelo Francis Corva, 159 Great Neck Road, Great Neck, New York a/c Dr. Simkin be GRANTED permission to construct dwelling exceeding maximum lot coverage, Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, New York, Lot 954, Cleaves Point, Filed Map #4650, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold TOwn Board of Appeals approve minutes dated March 2, 1978. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. ~On motion by Mr. Maimone, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals approve. minutes dated March' 10, 1978. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. Nine (9) Sign Renewals were reviewed and approved as submitted. On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Maimone, it was RESOLVED that the next meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals be held at 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, April 13, 1978, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Maimone. Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Southold Town Board of Appeals -42- March 23, 1978 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that a special meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals be held at 10:30 A.M. (E.S.T.), Friday, March 31, 1978, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Maimone. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 P.M. (E.S.T.). Re~s.~c t fu 1 ly ~bmitted, ~e~e~t~r~aws°n FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy Z981D Date .... ~ .e.o.e. ~..l~.e?..~..1 ................19 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ................... , ............................ Location of Property ~20 Snu.g Harbo~ Road ... ~ ..... .O?.q~..np.o.~.~. ,..N.,.Y. ,... /t~e ~o~ ...................... 'S't/eet Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section · · · .~.~. ...... Block . · · ~. .......... Lot .... .~/~. ......... Subdivision .~.1.~.~.V. 9.8..P.O. ~.rl.~./.~..o.o...~.~..~ ..... Filed Map No....h.6.5..O.Lot No..5.h. .......... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated · ?.e..'9.x~l..~..rT..'1,5.. ....... 197.8. pursuant to which Building Permit No ....... 9.6.7.~ ......... dated ... :'~. ,~P.P.~,~'..q./~ ............ 197.8. , was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... ....................... .~..x.v..~.e., .~..e. ?..~. ~, .~..e.x.x. ~.n~ ........................ The certificate is issued to ~tll~i.e.1 8~kin ..................... .................. of the aforesaid building· Suffolk County Departme~lt of Health Approval ...T.-.~.O.-..~.1 .... .1.2/.1.~../.7.9.....R.,..A. :..V.t:.]:..1.~.. UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO .......... .N...~.?.O.C~.. .............................. Building Inspector Rev 4/79 FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No ....g 105.1~3 ....... Date ....... 4un.e..3 .' .................. 19 .~ 1 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ~ · .52 · .Snug..liar, boy · Road ~..._.. Qvaenpo~.t~, N~w. Yo~'.k Location of Property House ~Jo. ' ........ · b'treet Hem/et County Tax Uap No. ]000 Section ...3~ ....... Block ..... 5 ......... Lot ...... 3~, ......... Subdivision C.],e&vea .~'o~.~t, '. · .Sao 0 · 3 ...... Filed Map Ho. A650...Lot No... 5A ......... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ·.. dane. 2fi ~ ......... 19.7.9 pursuant to which Building Permit No .... 1 DR81. Z .......... dated . .Jun~ .27.~ ................. 19 7.g, was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... ........... ~Zngr. ound..Swfmra/;ng. P. ool. and. Fa=ce .............................. The certificate is issued to .... I~ aac, te 1. ]...&. gu~.J. · 1.. E,J.m k ~.~ ........................... (owner~ffv~,~e~ ~C~_._ of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval ....... R/.R ............................... UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO ...... 1~ § ~.7.~ 8 7 .................................... Rev 4/79 ~K JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Southold, L. I., N. Y. 11971 To: March 6, 1978 Southold Town Zoning Board of Apppeals From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 2397, application of Francais Corva for a variance. Alos included is notification to adjoining property owners as follows: Helmer Kent, Port Washington, N.Y. cc:file Enc./ Box 457, Greenport, N.Y.; Rhoda Weston, llO5O. Town Clerk 76 Bogart Avenue, Town Of Southold TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 TOWN CLERK 765.3783 Building Dept. f Plannin9 Bd. 765-2660 Board of Appeals Pursuant to the General Municipal Law, Chapter 24, of the Consolidated Laws, Article 12-B, Sections 239-1 and m, the ...Boarcl.-.of...J~pl~.ats ......... of the town of Southold, N. Y. hereby refers the following (agency invor'v~c[) proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: [check one) Angelo Francis Corva 159 Great Neck Road Great Neck, NY ...... New and recodified zoning ordinance ............ Amendment to the zoning ordinance ............ Zoning changes ........... Special permits ..X .......Va6ances Location of affected land: ...Snug..Harbo=..Road,...Greenport~...Lot..#54.,...Cle~ves...Point Sub. within 500 feet of: (check one or moreI ............ Town or vi([age boundary llne ............ State or county road, parkway or expressway ............ State or county park or recreation area .......... Stream, or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines ............ State or county ownediparcel on which a public building is situated ~ ......... i~:Sh°reline The applicant wishes to construct a dwelling covering 22.8% of the lot which exceeds the maximu~ lot coverage of 20% allowed underrthe Ordinance. Date: March..13.,....1978 .......... (sign~) Robert W. Gillispie, Jr. Chairman Tide Date received by Suffolk County Planning Commission ........................................................ File No ............................... Suffolk County Departm~n~ of Plannln~ H. Lee Denmison ~xecutive Cfflce Building Veterans ~moria! I!ighway iIauppauge~ ~ew York 11787 (516) 979-2918 Town of Southold Board of Appeals April 4, 1978 Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk CotmtX Charter, the following applications which have been referred to the Suffolk Coumty Plannin? Corz~ission ar~ considered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapprcval. ~plicant ~funicipal File ."~umber Patrick & LindaLyons Angelo Francis Corva P.B.M. Associates, Inc. Wilford Kryger Victor Teich 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Plannins GGN: ~ k Gerald G.."~ewman Chief Planner BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of totheBoardofAppealsoftheTownofSouthold TO: Helmer Kent Rhoda Weston NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: \ 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold C to request a (Variance) {~il0]~i~'(~tO~I]~0'~l~[~) (the following relief: perm±ss±on t.O erect a one-family home containing 22.8% of lot coverage }. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: North bv Rhoda Weston. South by Helmet K~nE: F.a.q~- by Snug Harbor Road, West by Dawn Lagoon and Gull~Pond. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: "A" Residential and Agricultural 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: a one-family dwelling containing 3,344.42 square feet. permission to erect That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signedare: ArE~c]e TIT: ~q~=c~--ic~n ]00-~] 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you mav then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: March 2, 1978 P~titl n~ ~ Francis Corva Angelo Post Office Address 159 Great Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS HELMER KENT RHODA WESTON Box 457 Greenport, NY 11944 76 Bogart Avenue Port Washington, NY 11050 STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: Mary Lou Doroski , residing at Peconic Bay Boulevard: T.~,~r~], New York , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3 rd day of March~ ,19 78 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at Cutchoque, New York ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (r~4i~kmail. Sworn to before me this 3rd day of March ,19 78 Notary Public NIATCH~7 LiNE SEE SEC 030-02-001 \ / GULL POND INL£ 7' OWNER; TITI,.I~ ~UFP. CO. H~,ALTH DF-I~I'. APPROVAL. j H. ~.' biO. STATI~I WNT OP FF. CO, ~lEl~. O~ Ht~,ALTH C(N~IIIII~I~J C110N ONLY I ~TAMP ~ BUFF. CO. DE~T. C~e H~ALTH IlJtVl:il ~rAT£MENT OF IN~NT FOR APPROVAL OF CONI~U~ ONLY (~/m~ ~E WAT~ SUPPLY AND ~WAG~ H, J. REF, NO,: 7- ~ ~ ~[ ~TANDARD~ OF SUFFO~ CO. DEPT, DRAWING ~A~E ~i~l~0 ~AWN ~¥ ~ c~acK~o ~¥ ~ DRAWING NO. TOV~'bl HALL MAIN ROAD - A.2 .[::) -X 1 ~C ,C ANGEL_~)'FRANcts CORVA ASSoCIATEs, ARE]HITECTS ~ ~.. ~B ~".REV I DAW E I DESCRIPTION ~Y ~,NGELO FF:::IANCIS CORVA ~. Assor~IATES, AROHITEOTS 15B GREAT NECK ROAD, GREAT NECK, NEW YORK 11021 DRAWING DATE , l,,llq DRAWN BY ~*~1~ PROJEOT T~70~;~ I . DRAWING ND~ A-'4 REV OATE DESCRIPTION BY ~,~'L,'~ i ANGELO FRANCIS CORVA ~ AS SOCIATE S, AROHITECTS SCALE ~[i.~11 CH~CKED BY A~; PROJECT ~OZ"[ SHEET ~ OF ~ F [ &- :i E ] I, [DESCRIPTION ~,NGELO FRANCIS CORVA ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS DRAWING DRAWN BY CHECKED.BY. SHEET A.6 h LREVl°A*E I DEBOF:IIPTION / ::' E3¥' M/ ANGEEO FRANCIS r~ORVA, ASSOCIATES ARCHIT'~ ~.TS DATE ~ DRAWN BY ~,~ SCALE ~U=Li.mlI CHECKED BY ~__~,; O~AW I NB NO, A.7