Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2501 Legal Notice of Hearings -2- December 21, 1978 8:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width and for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-41 and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, two-family house and two, one-family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. ~ 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for permission to ~ an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Apostolos Skaperdas, ~ 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XIII, Section 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. Dated: December 11, 1978. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLISH ONE (1) TIME DECEMBER 14, 1978, AND FORWARD SIX (6) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS . PRIOR TO DECEMBER 21, 1978. Copies mailed to the following on December 11, 1978: Charles DeVoe as agent for Dolores G. Avella Anthony Sponza Richard and Donnalee Relyea Susan Clark Apostolos Skaperdas one. lwo-family house and parcels with insufficient area. Location of propert_¥: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue. Ne~ Suffolk, New York. bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; soulh by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demanini. ap~ljfa!?n o~ S.u~aE~ glark, 47 ~arrow Street, New York. New York. for a special exception to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for permission to use an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location I of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York. bounded on lhe norlh by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demamini. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Apostolos Ska- perdas, 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick, New York. for a variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance. Article XIII. Section 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule house with reduced side yard setback. Localion of property: Lot No. 130, Map No.' 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. Dated: December 11. 1978 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS IT I)/14/78/725} LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on Thursday, December 21, 1978, on the following appeals: 7:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Dolores G. Avella, 536 8th Street, Palisades Park, New Jersey (Char. les DeVoe as agent) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-34 and Bulk Parking Schedule for per- mission to construct a house with a reduced front yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 45 of Map No. 3444, Orient-By-The~Sea, Section Two, Orient, New York. 7:50 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Anthony Sponza, Ryder Farm Lane, Orient, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-34 and Bulk Parking Schedule for per- mission to construct a garage with insufficient front yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 54, Map No. 3444, Orient-By-The-Sea, Section Two, Orient, New York. 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Richard and Donnalee Relyea, Delmar Drive, Laurel, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 10~3,?, and Bulk Parking Schedule for per- mission to construct an ac- cessory building in the front yard area and variance in accordance with Section 280A of the Town Law for recognition of access. Location of property: Foxhollow Road and Deer Path Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Beier; east by Beier; south by Mattituck Creek; west by Private Road. 8:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upo~ application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for per- mission to divide property with insufficient width and for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-41 and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, two- family house and two, one- family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded December 14, 1978 ~n the north by Syms; east ew Suffolk Lane; south New Suffolk Avenue; west b Hartung and Demartini. ~l~ 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special ex- ception to the Zoning dinance, Article IV, Section] 100-40 B for permission to use an existing r~ house as a two-family d~n~ Location of property: New 9/]ffolk Lane aha New Suffolk Argue, New Suffit~, ~/~V. Yorl~, ~0ounded ~on the r~:'-- by~m~; east by ~.ew- __Su~f~__ ~ south by ~ew ~ Av~; west by ~.liar tunga~nd Demartini. · 8:~ n~,.M. (E.S.T.) Upon a,~Pliq~qon of Apostolos ~apq~las, 310 Merrick 'Avefiu~, M~rrick, New York, for a~varianee to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XIII, Section 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. Dated: December 11, 1978. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS 1TD14-3119 ¥ OF SUFFOLK, OF NEW YORK. I ss: Tro~ (L,~stav.~,qn being duly Sworn. at . h~ .... is Printer and Publisher of ~e SUFFOLK ~Y TIMES, a news~per publish~ ~ Greenport, in said and ~at the noti~, of which ~e ~e~ is u print~ ~as been published in the s~d Suf~lk Week~ Times each week, ~or . . 9R~] ..................... weeks TOWU OF SOU'm~D .U'LDlUG ~E~'AR'rMEu'r TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL .......................... ~..7 ........ ~... ....... ....... 1 ................. FLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ~0V' _~ 19.~.~ Jar permit to c~t ........................................ :~t Ibc prom:scs located at .................................... . ~,..u~.....C.....V~.~ ....... :?.~.K.~.~ff......~S~,r ~,~ ~ .~, ~ ~ Mop .......... ~ .................... Block ........................................ Lot ~ is returned ~erewith and disapproved on the follow:rig gmuncls ..... I..~ ...~.~.C..~.~7.~.~.~ ............. Buildin~ Inspector TOWN OF 8OUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEt~ION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. ¥. Name Street and Number .................................................................. ........ ................... Municipality State hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE ~' SUBSECTION ~) SECTION /@0-- ~ 0 THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS REQUESTED BECAUSE ST*TS OF NSW YORK ~ ) ss co~rY o~,~-~';//~ ~ ....................... '~L~;~;;';; ............................................. S~rn to th~ ...,~ ....... day of~.~f.~ ....... 19,~.~ ......... ELrZABETH ANN N~VILL~ NOTARY PUBLIC. State of New Yot~ No, 52-8125850, Suffolk County Tem~ Expires March 30, FORM ZB2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P~/OPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER : STREET VILLAGE LOT FORA4EJ~,OWN ER RES. ~",~ SEAS. LAND IMP. /~ AGE NEW F~rm T~e 1 Til~le 2 Tilleble 3 W~land Swempland . Brushlond Ho~e PI~ To{al ' ~oo NOP,,V~L~ Acre DISTRICT SUB. BUILDING CONDITION BELOW Value Per Acre ABOVE Value FRONTAGE ON wX"iER FRONTAGE ON ROAD ,~::~f'~ ~,- ~'~"~(x~'7~/ ~ ~ = f?~ BULKHEAD DOCK f ~. Bldg, Extension Extension Garage ~.B. Foundation Basement Ext. Walls ~rl ¢~_ Bath Porch Floors Interior Finish Heat Fire Place ~1~ Roof Type t ~ Rooms 1st Floor Patio Driveway Rooms 2nd Floor Dormer K JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, L. I., N. Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 November 30, 1978 To: From: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 2500 & 2501 for a_special e~ and variance, application by Suzanne Clark. Also included are notification to adjoining property owners as follows: John Hartung, New Suffolk, New York 11956; Louis Demartini, Bunny Lane, New Suffolk, 11956; Helen M. Syms, 9219 Whittaker Avenue, Sepulveda, Calif. 91343 N.Y. JTT/bn cc:file Enc./ Town Clerkg MEMORANDUM TO THE FILE APPEAL NO. 2500 Appeal of Suzanne Clark 47 Barrow Street New York, New York Town Counsel has advised the Board that it is not necessary to require a special exception to divide a rooming house into a two-family house in the "M" Light Multiple-Residence District. Therefore, Mrs. Clark was allowed to withdraw her application. January 10, 1979 bcc SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF'~PEALS -13- De.ce~r 21, 1978 MR. DeMARTINI: Are you going to live here, Mrs. Clark? MRS. CLARK: I am going to live in one half of the house for the summer. MR. DeMARTINI: Thank you. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2500 - Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special exception to the zoning ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for permission to use an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk ' Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affi- davits attesting to its publicaiton in the official newspapers, and dis- approval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: John Hartung, Louis Demartini and Helen M. Syms. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: Town Counsel has advised the Board it is not necessary to require a special exception to divide a rooming house into a two-family dwelling in the "M" Light Multiple-Residence District. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED that Mrs. Clark is withdrawing her application No. 2500 for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis and Douglass. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2502 - Upon application of Apostolos Skaperdas, 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XIII, Sectio~ 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers of the Town, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Ms. Nina S. Magen and Kenneth Deegan. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: In the Notice to Neighbors the applicant states that they want ~o reduce the side yard setback requirement from 17-1/2 feet to 15 feet. This is one of the lots in Pebble Beach Farms facing on the sound. BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: Eel vlwd , I,q. sis 93 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: NOTICE 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Vari~ance)l(~pecial _Exception) (~e',/tf~P~r/~i~f,(,~fglt'9~j~fg,,f~e~ ). 2. That the pronerty which is the subject of the Pet~on is located, adjacent to your p~roperty and is des- cribed as follows: J~ol,",f~--/"'J,,, /'V/, ,~'~'~ S'~ ,~"~L~', 7~- /l~/.,~ ...CP~,-~,,p~ ~ ? ~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning dist~ct: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: 7~ o/,~/,~,~ ~ 5. That [he provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code ap?Licable to the relief soughtJ~y the under- signedare: ~ ~ IOe-~l $ ~T' ~ lOC) gJ~-J gt~ ~x~l~C~:~,ga ~ 6. That with~: '~ ~ve days from 'the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you ma)' then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: /0~ ~O,~ [ ~ ]~O°' NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS CD CO CO 9L61 STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: ~ ~ ~ ~ yo~ /~O~ ~ , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~ o~ day of ~~ ,19 ~ ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite thor respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post ~- rice at ~ w ~ y ~ ~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) ~::gL:_.~J; mail. Sworn to yefore me this ~ 0 Notary Public ELIZABETH ANN NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York Coun t.6A[cl ' t.3, A[ c 'l ~,.7A {c} NEW 1.3A(c) J5 3O 8 hlA[c) RD. QZO I? 4.lA(C) (50') RD. 4.1A(C) 25 : 5.3A {c) 15 SUFFOLK 4 20 190' AVE. 8 $ Z9 - MATCH SEE SEC. NO [10 LiNE FOR PARCEL NO. SEE SEC. NO. llO -08-034 2.0~,[c 1 ?.4 3.t At.c'} 6 Z9 1.4A[cl School z.6A[cl Cree; 46 t.5~tcl I NEW SUFFOLK L-~95 -J MAP OF P.P. OPE~T"/ 5U,r2.VEYED FOP_ DANIEL A. FOG ^ LEM ANN ~N~_W, SUFFOL~ ~ T_OWN GUA~AhlTEED ,nD THE AD"IEI2~CAIN TITLE iNSU~AN,~F___ CO,: '-Et_~.MONUI~,ENI" - .. ". G~LD,~P_ [PE:, ..... ....:: ... .... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. ~ O/ DATE ./~....~....'..~.~.~.~.~ ?'P TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ,, ~.....~.~.-..~....C.~ ........... of ...... ~.Z.....~.~....~. ............ Name of Appellor~t Street and Number ~ .O....~....1~ .. ~.....~.... ~..~./~/( /..O....O...../...~.. ........... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR pERMIT NO ..................................... DATED ...... /~.~...,...~./~.f.J..~...7.~C ....... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO .............. ...~..~.~.......~. ...... ..O..~.~ ................ Name of Applicant for permit o~ '. .............. ..~.:Z....~.~.~.~.~...~. ...... ~.Y. ........ .~..~.. ......... i.~..~.~...Y. ........... Street and Number Municipality State (I~ PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) 1. LOCATION OF 'THE PROPERTY ~..e....b?...~..k.....~..~....~....~....~.?...~...~.'-,~M_~_ Use District on Zoning Map Street Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi.non~e.) ~% I 3. ~PE OF APPEAL Appeal is ~de herewith for ( / A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordi~nce or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap· 62 Cons· ~ws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous op~)eol ('has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for o variance and was mode in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 J~A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ) requested for the reason that Form ZBI (Continue on other side) RE^SON FOR APPE~ Co..nu~ ~'~ 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would p~e pm~ti~al difficulties or 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shored by oil prope~ies alike ig the immediate vicinity ofthis prope.yand in this use district because ~ ,~ ~~ 3. Th~ Variance would obsewe t~e spirit of ~ O~dinance and WOU~D NOT.CHANGE ~HE c~CT~ ? ~ D,SmCT ~.~.~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - --) . , · ~ ~ ' STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNT* o~£~/k ) Sworn to this ........... .(~..~J~ ................... day Of ........ ~...d)..~..~.Z'3~4~... .............. 19 ? ~ NBTARY pUgLIC, State al New Yor~ 52-8125850, Sufhlk ~ Legal Notice of Hearings -2- December 21, 1978 8:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 row Street, New York, New York, for a variance to the Zoning inance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, insufficient width and Article IV, Section 100-41 two-family house and two, one-family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. ~ ~ 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for permission rouse an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Dema~tini. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Apostolos Skaperdas, 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XIII, Section 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, East Marion, New York. Map of Pebble Beach Farms, Dated: December 11, 1978. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLISH ONE (1) TIME DECEMBER 14, 1978, AND FORWARD SIX (6) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR TO DECEMBER 21, 1978. Copies mailed to the following on December 11, 1978: Charles DeVoe as agent for Dolores G. Avella Anthony Sponza Richard and Donnalee Relyea Susan Clark Apostolos Skaperdas LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provisions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public bearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Rail, Main Road, Southold, New York, on Thursday, December 21, 1978, on the following appeals: 7:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Dolores G. Avella, 536 8th Street, Palisades Park, New Jersey (Charles DeVoe as agent) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-34 and Bulk parking Schedule for pe~ mission to construct a hans with a reduced front yar, setback. Location of property Lot No. 45 of Map No. 3444 Orient-By-The~ea, Sectm~ Two, Orient, New York. 7:50 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upo~ application of Anthon~ Sponza, Ryder Farm Lane Orient, New York for ~ variance in accordance wit~ the Zoning Ordinanec, Articl, III, Section 100-34 and Bul! Parking Schedule for pe] mission to construct a garag with insufficient front yar setback. Location of propert) December 14, t978 o~ the north by Syms; east New Suffolk Lane; south y New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Susanue Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, fol~ a special ception to the Zoning Or- Lot No. 54, Map No. 344, Orient-By-The-Sea, Sectic dinance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for ~on to use Two, Orient, New York. is,~., r ~a~aing house as a 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upe aneX ~,. . ' n application of Richard an two-famdy dwelli~g_~· ~ ..L~e~a~ti? of n~W~rty: New SUffO~ ~ane Donnalee Relyea, Delma ~nr~q~e~ Suffolk Avenue, N.ew~ Drive, Laurel, New York, a variance in accordance with Suffolk, New York, boun~b~ ' on the north by Syms; east y the Zoning Ordinance, Article ' New Suffolk l.,~e; S~wtesht bbY~ III, Section 100-32 and Bulk Parking Schedule for per- New Suffolk Avenue; w Y mission to construct an ac- Hartung and Demartini. cessury building in the front 8:40 P.M. ¢(E..S.T.) Upon yard area and variance in anplication- of Apostolos o~. a~? e~J10 Merrick accordance with Section 280A o~.aper~- , ._ .. -- ,. of the Town Law for Avenue, Merrick, l~ew ¥or~, recognition of access, for a variance to the Zoning Location of property: Ordinance, Article XIII, Foxhollow Road and Deer Section 136 and Bulk Parking Path Road, Mattituck, New Schedule for permission to York, bounded on the north by construct a house with Beier; east by Beier; south by reduced side yard setback. Mattituck Creek; west by Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map_ of. Private Road. Pebble Beach Farms, l~as~ 8:10 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, Marion, New York. 47 Barrow Street, New York, ~)ated: December 11, I978. _ BY oRDER OF New York, for a variance to TIIE SOUTHOLD the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk ToWN BOARD OF APPEALS Parking Schedule for per- mission to divide property 1TD14-3119 __ with insufficient width and for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-41 and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, two- family house and two, one- family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New ~Suffulk, New York, bounded INTY OF SUFFOLK, ~ ss: ~TE OF NEW YORK, .... '4¥(~y-.~b.~.t~av.son .............. being duly Sworn, that . !~? .... is P~inter and Publisher of ~e SUFFOLK EKLY TIMES, a news~per publish~ at Gr~nport, in s~d ~ty; and ~at the noti~, of which ~e ~e~ is u print~ ~. has been published in the ~d Sufblk Week~ Times in each week, ~or . . o.rlc ..................... weeks essiv~Iy commencing on ~e .fo.u~Z.~.~k ............ of . 'n to ~fore me th~ .... JOSEg~ LATiRENCE TOWNSEND LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARINGS Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provi- sions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on Thurs- day, December 21, 1978, on the following appeals: 7:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Dolores G. Avel- la, 536 8th Street, Palisades Park, New Jersey (Charles DeVoe as agent) for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill, Section 100-34 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with a reduced front yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 45 of Map No. 3444, Orient- By-The-Sea, Section Two, Ori- ent, New York. 7:50 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Anthony Spon- za, Ryder Farm Lane, Orient, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill, Section 100-34 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a garage with insuf- ficient front yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 54, Map No. 3444, Orient-By- The-Sea, Section Two, Orient, New York. 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Richard and Donnalee Relyea, Delmar Drive, Laurel, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 111, Section 100-32 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to construct an accessory building in the front yard area and variance in accordance with Section 280A of the Town Law for recognition of access. Location of property: Fox- hollow Road and Deer Path Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Beier; east by Beier; south by Mattituck Creek; west by Private Road. 8:10 P.M. (E.S.T.I Ut~on application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York. New York, tbr a variance to the Zoning Ordinance. Article 111, Section 100-31 and Bulk Park- ing Schedule for permission to divide property with insuffi- cient width and for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-41 and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, two-family house and two, one-family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; cast by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue: west by Hartung and Demartini. 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordi- nance. Article IV. Section 100-40 B for permission to use an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on lhe north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Apostolos Ska- perdas. 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick. New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance. Article Xlll, Section 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. Dated: December 11, 1978 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NE'VV YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, soys that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for ........... /. ........................... weeks successively, commencing on the ....././~.. ............................... Sworn to before me this /~-' day ot PROPOSED DECISION SUZANNE CLARK Appeal No. 2501 The applicant's Appeal No. 2501 contains a sketch of the property she proposes to buy and this property has been divided into parcels "A", "B" and "C" in approximately equal sizes of about 20,000 square feet in each parcel. Parcel A consists of 105 feet of road frontage on New Suffolk Avenue and Parcel B immediately adjoining to the west has 87.56 feet on New Suffolk Avenue. Both parcels have a depth of approximately 177.26 feet. On parcel "A" there is a 22 room house which the applicant proposes to restore and make into a two-family house from a former boarding house use. Parcels "A" and "B" are in a "M" Light Multiple Zone district. Located partially on Parcel "A" and Parcel "B" is a cottage (marked as Cottage No. 1) which is to be moved in front of the garage located on parcel "B". At the same time the cottages marked at No. 2 and No. 3 located on Parcel B and Parcel "C" will be demolished. ~Conditions applied to the granting of this subdivision of land which seem appropriate in the area based on the surrounding lot sizes are as follows: (1) Creation of Lot A is condition on removing Cottage No. 1 from Parcel "A" and "B" to a central Location on Parcel "B" and locating it near the presently existing garage on Parcel "B". (2) The elimination of Cottages No. 2 and No. 3. (3) The residence to be created on Parcel "B" will be a one- family residence. (4) Any subsequent building on Parcel "C" shall be a one-family residence. (5) One-family residences on Parcels "B" and ~C" must adhere to the side yard, front yard and rear yard requirements of the building requirements of the present Zoning Ordinance, but none of these three parcels shall be inhibited by the 40,000 square foot requirement. Page 2 Suzanne Clark - Appeal No. 2501 (6) Ail individual dwelling units on Parcels "A", "B" and "C" shall meet the 850 square foot minimum area requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. (7) Site Plan Approval of the Planning Board. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUiI~blNG DEPARTMEHT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL ~o .~ .o....z....~..~.~.E ....... C.~.5...C..'..<...~: ............ C,~-~ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ~0~ 3¢ .................................................... , 19 ...... b~V~E ~c,~'~'~ Y ' for permit to c~ ........................................ at the premises Iocmed at ................... ~'E .......................................... :.... ...................... St,=,,7 Map .......... ~.: ................. Block ............................................ Lot returned herewith and disapproved on the follow:ng grounds ..... ~..~.....~.~.~..~.~T.~.~.~. ............ .............. ,~L~.~.~..~..Y ......... ~.~.L L..I e( G. .......... ~.~.ff b~ ~. >~ 2~ ~¢."~'"~oo ~ ¢"; ....... ~'"'~'i'5: .............................. Building Inspector JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 November 30, 1978 To: From: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 2500 & 2501 for a Special exception an~, application by Suzanne Clark. Also included are notification to adjoining property owners as follows: John Hartung, New Suffolk, New. York 11956; Louis Demartimi, Bunny Lane, New Suffolk, N.Y. 11956; Helen M. Syms, 9219 Whittaker Avenue, Sepulveda, Calif. 91343 JTT/bn cc:file' Enc./ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF A~PEAI.$ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 May 1, 1991 Ms. Suzanne Clarke 4253 Karensue Avenue San Diego, CA 92122 Re: Appl. No. 2501 - ZBA Determination Rendered 12/21/78 CTM 91000-117-6-32 at New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk Dear Ms. Clarke: This letter will confirm that we have reviewed the above file material and circumstances affecting your proposed located at New Suffolk Road, New Suffolk, identified as District 1000, Section 117, Block 6, Lot 32. It is the determination of this Department that the conditional variance granted under Appl. No. 2501 on December 21, 1978 is still in full force and effect under the new Master Plan and Zoning Amendments now in effect. This will also confirm that the grant of this variance as to the bulk schedule area requirements for each of the three lots in question were "grandfathered" by the Planning Board during September 1980, the Town Board enacted Subsection A106-53 of the Southold Town Code determining that any Planning Board approvals that may have been required with respect to the "grandfather" schedule of ~BA determination~ were deemed to have been~[rant~e~ with the se~%~_f~Ar]~_~nde~_if ~b~__~ ~-~-en submit~6--~d approved by the~l~nn~n? Boated. Our file squaws t~t not only-were your lots approved under the "grandfather schedule," but you did obtain approval by resolution adopted by the Planning Board at its Regular Meeting held on January 9, 1979. Although you have shown proof that the "covenant of no further division" was filed with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office, and our Department agrees that the Board of Appeals and Planning - Board approvals have been obtained and are in effect, you have not deeded the parcels out as of the present time and have not obtained a final map. It is recommended that you meet with a local surveyor in order to prepare a final map confirming the 'Fage 2 - May 1, 1991~~ To: Ms. Suzanne Clarke~ Re: Appl. No. 2501 lot lines and area of each lot before deeding the parcels out and updating the map to show new and existing structure(s). In order for any Certificates of Occupancy to be issued by the Town for the lots separately, a final map will be necessary and will need to be filed with us. When preparing the final map, ~please be sure to apply as close to 20,000 sq. ft. to each lot ~as is possible and evenly. Very truly yours.,____ P T( JOHN~CKHAM, Chairman FRANK S. COYLE HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr. FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL Southold, N.Y. 11971 January 17, 1979 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Robert Gillispie, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Gillispie: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held January 9, 1979. RESOLVED to approve the site plan of Suzanne Cla~k as contract vendee subject to receipt of a covenant that no further submissions on parcels A and B will be brought to any Board in the Town of Southold and said covenant will run with the property and said covenant to be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office. Yours truly, Muriel Brush, Secretary APR 2 6 DECLA~ATICN made this 15th day of January, 1979, by Suzanne Clarke, residing at 47 Barrow Street, Ne~ York, New York, hereinafter called I&TiEREAS, the Owner has title to certain lands situate, lying and being at New Suffolk, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, said lands hereinafter being more particularly described; and WI~Q%S, it is the Owner's intention that the aforesaid lands be divided into not more than three (3) residential lots; NC~{, 7.~-.--~:?ORE, the foll~,-ing described 1-~nds ~atl be restricted DECLARANT dees hereby warrant, covenant and represent that on site approval of the division of the aforesaid described lands into three (3) lots by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, no further application will be ~ade to that Board or to any other Board in the Town of Southold to further divide any of the said lots. DECfARk~ does hereby further warrant, covenant and represent that the aforesaid described lands cannot be divided into more than three (3) lots and that each lot shall cc~prise an area of not less than 18,000 square feet, with one residence per lot. DE(J~NT does hereby further warrant, covenant and represent that the foregoing restrictions and agreements shall bind the undersigned, her heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all p°-r~on or _persons ~o shall ~uoceed to f-he c~.~ers~p of an}, of tke lots ~%c~ on the a/o~.~d .t~ by. ~ansfer or ~i'A'iE Of' NfSq YORK ) CC~_~q~ CL~ N~ YORK) ss.: On the 15th day of J&nuary, 1979, before ~.~ personally came Suzanne Clarke, to me known and known to me to be the ~]ividual described in and who executed the foregoing instru~-~nc and acknowledged tome that she executed same~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS Southold Town Board of Appeals -c:OUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1609 December 22, 1978 Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Building Southold, New York 119.71 Re:' Appeal No. 2501 Suzanne Clark Dear Sirs: At the December 21, 1978, meeting of the Board of Appeals Mrs. Clark was granted permission to divide %he property shown on the enclosed survey into three parcels with insufficient area and frontage on New Suffolk Avenue and New Suffolk Road. One of the conditions of %he variance was site plan approval by you. At your January 9, 1979 meeting would you be kind enough to review this mat%er and te% us know your decision. Thank you for your help in this matter. Yours truly, ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR. Chairman RWG:bcc Encls. S0UTH6LD TOWN BOARD OF APPE~S -4- December 21, 1978 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance to the zoning ordinance and a variance to the Town Law for f access, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publicatior~ in the official newspapers, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Klaus Beier, Kenneth Ramsauer. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: The survey of the property indicates that the property contains 1.16 acres and is a rather long, narrow lot running to Mattituck Creek from a private right-of-way, access is obtained by private roads, Deer Path Road and Foxhollow Road. It is also located on another right- of-way. The applicant doesn't mention it, but the back yard area of this property slopes rather steeply to the Creek and it would not be feasible to locate a garage there. Is there anyone who wishes to speak for this application? (there was no'response). Is there anyone who wishes to speak against this application? (there was no response). Are there any other questions? You know the application better than anyone, Terry. MR. TUTHILL: Well, it makes sense to me. I do not think it is an unusual situation. After inspection and investigation the Board finds that the applicant wishes to construct a garage in the front yard area and requires recognition of access to his property. The Findings of the Board are that they are in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. Due to the sloping legal back yard area, it would not be feasible to build a garage in that location. After inspectiOn of the rights-of-way to the property the Board finds t]~ .~ are narrow, but in good condition. ° · The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would pro- duce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance will'not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion, by Mr. Tuthill, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that Richard and Donnalee Relyea, Delmar Drive, Laurel, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct an accessory building in the front yard area and GRANTED recognition of access in accordance with Section 280A of the Town Law. Location of property: Foxhollow Road and Deer Path Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on the north by Beier; east by Beier; south by Mattituck Creek; west by Private Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Tuthill and Douglass. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2501. - Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a variance to the Zoni~ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -5- December 21, 1978 Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width and for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-41 and Bulk Parking Schedule to have one, two-family house and two, one-family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance to the zoning ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: John Hartung, Louis Demartini and Helen M. Syms. Fee paid $15.00. TERRY TUTHILL: Mr. Chairman, I have to disqualify myself from this hearing due to the fact I have a conflict of interest, and I am going' ~ to excuse myself from the room. THE CHAIRMAN: This is quite an elaborate project and maybe a word will help to understand this. At present there appears to be a large old dwelling on the corner of New Suffolk Avenue and New Suffolk Lane which, I guess, in the past has been used as a boarding house. The pro- posal is to restore that and create a two,family"dwelling With its own lot. On the adjoining lot that is applied for, Parcel B, several buildings would be combined into a_.one-family structure. There is a cottage near the tennis court near the north end of the property which would be moved and joined to the cottage and garage on Parcel B. That leaves parcel C, on which there is a tennis court on the Westerly end and a cottage immedi- ately to the rear of the old residence would be placed on the parcel C to be created. Each of these parcels would have approximately half an acre in area. Parcel A would have 18,600 square feet; Parcel B would have 22,000 square feet and Parcel C would have 20,000 square feet with reasonabl~ frontage considering the area. The lots would be comparable'to the adjoining lots in the area~ Is there anyone present who would like to speak for this application? SUZANNE CLARK: As you have indicated this is an ambitious project, and I would like to show you some of the pictures of what I would have in mind. I would like to explain one problem that has come up according to my architect. The consolidation of the 2 small cottages which you indicated on parcel B. is the problem. I had hoped to connect the 2 cottages with a,greenhouse. My architect has not physically inspected the two cottages. The one I want to move from the tennis court nearer to the garage. However, I did show him the pictures, and he said Ghat I would sink so much money into these cottages which did not appear to have any architectural or historical value. He suggested that I not do that. He said that the early 19th century cottage which is close to the main house is worth preserving. THE CHAIRMAN: These just look like enclosures, really. MRS. CLARK: I think they were originally sheds. I think on the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -6- December 21, 1978 survey one of them was shown as a shed. So what he suggested I do is move the cottage over here and if I wish, put up a new salt box by the ~ tennis court. I have checked out the salt box situation with Mr. Schwa~ of Circa Design. He has a very nice, 2 story salt box. I think this makes sense to put a new salt box by the tennis court. I can do this observing all of the setback requirements. This cottage on Parcel C is too close to the line. By putting Cottage No. 1 in front of Cottage No. 3 I can observe the 50 foot setback for the front yard requirement. So there will be privacy from the Hartung property which does not exist now due to the closeness of the cottage to that lot line. Besides doing that I intend to screen this by planting hedges here. THE CHAIRMAN: Then you would eliminate the shed entirely? MRS. CLARK: I would tear this one down. I would use the garage as a garage. .It has been squared off since this survey was drawn. THE CHAIRMAN: Essentially we would have the same number of buildings. Then you would have one house on each site. MRS. CLARK: The character of the new building is consistent with the neighborhood. THE CHAIRMAN: You have used here as a hardship the question of availability of mortgages or financing. I was just wondering what that is based on. MRS. CLARK: When I made this application the interest rate was still 8-1/2 percent. It was impossible for anyone to get mortgages.at that point. I am having to put a tremendous amount of cash into the purchase of this property, and it is half commercial the way it is now. To get a mortgage on the entire property, the most the bank would give would be 50 percent. I have to be able to finance this project as I go along. THE CHAIRMAN: This balloon payment, what does that mean? MRS. CLARK: The whole entire first mortgage must be paid off in December 1979. It is a $29,000.00 payment that is due. THE CHAIRMAN: If you had to do that without being able to divide up this property so you could borrow against individual pieces of it rather than the whole thing, you would have a problem. Is this what you are saying? MRS. CLARK: Yes, I would fix up the cottage first. Then get- a mort- gage on that so I would be able to pay off the mortgage next year and have a little something left over. The new salt box can be financed through the builder. I just have to be able to give him a single parcel of land free and clear. THE CHAIRMAN: Of course financial hardship is generally regarded as irrelevant. But I think it is interesting, and the Board is very sympathetic. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -7- December 21, 1978 MRS. CLARK: Essentially, like to buy the property, but an arrangement like this. it is a hardship to the sellers. I would it has to be divided and allow me to work THE CHAIRMAN: One of our members was interested enough to consult two bank officials after we looked at the property. MR. DOUGLASS: I found out through discussions with them they would mortgage the whole thing under extreme cases. Nine chances out of ten it would be a commercial mortgage. The interest rate would be very high rather than at individual rates. MRS. CLARK: I was also told, they probably would not go more than 50 percent. MR. DOUGLASS: Under a commercial mortgage they said they would mortgage more than 50 percent. THE CHAIRMAN: Would you plan to use this yourself? MRS. CLARK: I would plan to live in the part of the house that has the porch around it and the old pine floors. I would like to live in that section of the house. I live and work in the city and this would be a summer proposition. I would like to keep all of these as an investment, and rent out the other portion of the house. There are 20 rooms in the. entire house, but there are separate staircases up and down. This wing was put on about 1880. I would also rent the cottage. I would.rent the salt box after I built that also. stand THE CHAIRMAN: Do you under/what Mr. Douglass is saying? MRS. CLARK: Yes, I have heard that even now there are restrictions on one family houses. They haven't really started lending. MR. DOUGLASS: They opened up a bit this past week. It'was at 9-1/2 percent. THE CHAIRMAN: Would these houses be created for year round.houses. MRS. CLARK: Frankly, with the very, very old cottage all I plan to do is put in a pot belly stove, which had been in there at one time. The flue is still there. It runs out the back of the house. Just to take the chill off the house. This is a single wall construction house. There is no insulation or anything. That would only be a summer residence, and I myself will be out here in the summer. THE CHAIRMAN: Now, which house would that be? MRS. CLARK: It would be the two-family house. THE CHAIRMAN: So it would not be heated? MRS. CLARK: The part that the Fogarty's live in now is heated. " SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -8- December 21, 1978 The portion of the house that is not heated is where I would live. I would put a pot bellied stove in that portion of the house. I would build the salt box last because I have to worry about paying off that first mortgage. The first thing I would do is restore the cottage. I have an estimate from Mr. Zaleski for moving it and Mr. Crenshaw for putting a foundation under it. I had the termite man there today. There are a number of beams that have to be replaced. THE CHAIRPLAN: You did have termites? MRS. CLARK: There were and one beam is broken. THE CHAIRMAN: What about this house? (meaning the two family house) MRS. CLARK: Well, no active condition. This house is very well constructed. The timbers are large and the pit does not go in very far. Most of %hem were powder post beetles. It is still very sound. It is in excellent shape. The ceilings have 1'2 inch timbers of oak with big wooden pegs. It must have been built by the same people who built ships. It is a wonderful house. THE CHAIRMAN: It sounds like a great project. MRS. CLARK: It is kind of my hobby. I really like to do this. I am kind of excited about it and hope I get the chance to do it. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else who would like to speak for thi( ~ application? . ~-~ RICHARD J. CRON: If it pleases the Board, I am here on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Fogarty, and in addition I also happen to be their neighbor to the south across New Suffolk Avenue. I think the application is a rather unique one. Particularly since the application seeks, at least in part, to divide a multiple zoned use area. I think the Board was accurate in assessing the existing situation. Yes, in the one corner you have the large framed structure which I guess at times has been used as a boarding house. The applicant is willing to restrict it in terms of its usage if the application is granted to a two-family usage. The number of buildings will be less than exist now if the application is granted. One of the buildings on that parcel B will be consolidated to another building further back by the tennis court. The other one would have been, under the basis of the application, which is now changed, would have been put on the tennis court parcel. In each instance when you are dealing with Parcel B & C the applicant is willing to restrict the usage on those parcels to single family dwellings, which is not the situation as it now exists. You do have on New Suffolk Avenue a multiple zoned use which I think would en- compass a greater use than what is proposed by the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: This would end up with less density than what you have now. MR. CRON: That is exactly what I am saying. So I think there is a~ sound rationale for granting the application although it is unique. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -9- December 21, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: So unique that the Building Inspector made an error in thinking that there had to be a special exception. There is no special exception required for a two-family use in a multiple zone because it is there inherently. MR. CRON: What you are doing basically is segregating what already exists in terms of the residential district from the multiple district. THE CHAIRMAN: It seems to me that if these were two private single residences in a residential zone owned by one person, or 3 lots owned by one person, and each one was divided separately you would not change the density at all. I think that the net effect of everything the applicant wants to do is going to be beneficial to the residents of New Suffolk. Is there anyone else who would like to speak for this application? (there was no response.) Is there anyone who would like to speak against this application? JOHN F. HARTUNG: I live to the west of the Fogarty property. The subdivision bothers me in the ability of the party that is going to purchase the property of completing her desires as she spoke here tonight. I would like to know what type of thoughts the Board would have and how the surrounding property like mine would be protected if these dwellings weren't so placed after ~rs. Clark is granted a three parcel piece of property out of the existing parcel. MRS. JOHN HARTUNG: No mention has been made of the resale of these three parcels. There would be 4 families living on one parcel. You talk about density, but not about the year round homes. THE CHAIRMAN: I think we have spoken of that. We have discussed the financial aspect of that. As I understand it from Mrs. Clark, the purpose of having this parcel divided is to have a little more assurance in being able to obtain bank financing at the ordinary level rather than at stratopheric levels which occur when you incorporate. Banks can charge a corporation far more than they can an individual. It seems to me in one sense that this tends to protect you. If this is not owned by someone other than Mrs. Clark in the future, it will be 2 or 3 people. MR. HARTUNG: Once you grant the subdivision what assurance are we going to have that all these houses are going to be transformed by Mrs. Clark as she depicts. THE CHAIR~i~N: I think we would condition the granting of this ap- plication on Mrs. Clark doing what she says. That would mean that someone else who takes it over would have to guided by the use restrictions which go with the land. MRS. HARTING: Suppose there was termination of the improvements? Suppose something happened? THE CHAIP~k~N: I don't think anyone can guarantee the future. MRS. HARTUNG: But once the division is made, we are the ones who have to live with three parcels that was once one parcel. loc~ -!0- December 21, 1978 . ne three parcels to be created are approxi- .I the parcels on the block. In fact they ~- :..: parcels within a few hundred feet of thi% ~,n Street, Main Street all have small parcels change the neighborhood as far as the density ~h it will reduce the density a little bit. ~ nt of New Suffolk for most of my life, I .,~£ems ~.;ithin the Town. I also feel that this ~m. I would like to see it divided into two New Suffolk? that is to be subdivided. t have to be subdivided. You are making a ~ little hard to follow. I think that sooner probably be subdivided with all the buildings Mrs. Clark is here or not. a~k you this question. As these three parcel§ saleable as A, B, and C? reason for separating them. They could be ~;sume that a bank will loan "X" amount of would probably allow a little more if i~_ one at a time. I cannot do them all together. ,~, r,. be a possibility of considering a creation ~arcels runn~; ~ '~, west across the premise and then at a later -~-_~ ~4rs,~~[a~e.~; her property, then she can apply for the DOUGLASS~ ~Oh~, let ,,e just answer something. Under the "M" zone frontage next to you ~s on now, she has the possibility of a lot ~-----~£ty then she will hay,. the '..,;ay she wants to divide it now, with =~7~_~%~al home. CHAIRMAN: That's a 'l,,od point. The density could be greatly ~ here. This is really a safety factor for you to confine it to -.----~_~le house and a singl,~ cottage next to you. You could have a lot ~-~_Lling units in an ":~" ;:one than are there now. F~ARTUNG: When did the zoning change on the property from boarding ~_~-conforming to M Zon, Is that when the Master Plan went through. ~HAI~4AN: I am not ::ure on that particular lot. HARTUNG: We were assured by the Building Inspector that that was ~ouse non-conforming. That was the way we understood it when _-~' property. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -11- December 21, 1978 MRS. HARTUNG: It does not seem likely that a man in his position would not know the zoning regulations. THE CHAIRMAN: It happens all the time. This was done on another parcel of property in New Suffolk. The people had 4 or 5 cottages on one parcel and we restricted them to seasonal use. The lady had a boarding house and a bunch of cottages. MRS. HARTUNG: There were two summer cottages on the water. THE CHAIRMAN: We had another application on the Sound where there were two small cottages. But you could have a good deal more density than is there now. MRS. HARTUNG: We are not worried about that. We have all the faith in Mrs. Clark that things will go along as she has planned, but once it is divided into three parcels they can be sold as soon as' the transfer goes in. The next owner may not do the renovating that Mrs. Clark has intended to do. THE CHAIRMAN: In that case you would not be any worse off than you are now. Mrs. Clark plans to improve the premises. MRS. HARTUNG: But I would have 3 neighbors instead of one. THE CHAIR~LAN: You do now, don't you? MRS. HARTUNG: Now, now they are summer cottages. In the summer time we have more people, but only in the summer. But this way, we could have 3 or 4 year round families. THE CHAIRMAN: No, I don't think so. MR. DOUGLASS: The only restrictions we would put on it would be for density, which is already taken care of. MR. HARTUNG: What I would request is some assurance what she is proposing is somehow carried out. I do not exactly know how to present that except that if the property were divided into half instead Of 3 parcels and then at a later date when she has changed the buildings and improved the structures, divide the one-half portion again. THE CHAIRMAN: I could not agree with that. It would negate the whole purpose of the application. Is there anyone else. LOUIS DeMARTINI: I would want to know if she moves cottages from one location to another on three different parcels, isn't there a part of the Zoning Ordinance that says the buildings have to have so many square feet? THE CHAIRMAN: You mean interior? It is required there be 850 square feet. One of them will be enlarged. MRS. CLARK: The one that will be preserved is already in excess of 850 square feet. The only one that will stand is okay. The other two will SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -12- December 21, 1978 be demolished. THE CHAIR~N: condition. I think we can include that in the decision as a ~R. DeMARTINI: The only thing I object to I do not care what they do with the rest of it. a precedent there. is the two-family house. You are going to start THE CHAIPd4AN: We had that battle for 25 years. MR. DeMARTINI: Well you have it here again. THE CHAI~4AN: This house is 20 rooms. or boarding house. It has been a tourist house MRS. HARTUNG: Mr. Gillispie, has the decision been made, or are you going to make it tonight? THE CHAIRMAN: We will make it tonight. MRS. HARTUNG: Who sits on the Board in review of this decision? THE CHAIRMAN: There are 3 of us here. MRS. HARTUNG: Are there any conflicting interests? THE CHAIRMAN: Not now to my knowledge. Charlie, Bob, conflicting interest in this application. do you have any MR. DOUGLASS: No. MR. GRIGONIS: No. THE cHAIRMAN: This is a five member board. majority. Three constitute a MRS. HARTUNG: That is the only point I wanted to make. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else? (there was no response) Would you please restate to the Board your plans with respect to this property since there have been some changes since your application was submitted? Mrs. Clark proceeded to explain in detail to the Hartungs what her plans were with respect to moving the cottages, building a new salt box and the large main house. THE CHAI~4AN: I'll tell you what. We will postpone the decision on this while you people finish discussing this amongst yourselves. Please feel free to go out in the lobby. We will hear this last hearing and then come back to you. MR. DeMARTINI: Mr. Chairman, could I ask Mrs. Clark one question? ~ THE CHAIRMAN: Sure, go ahead. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -13- December 21, 1978 MR. DeMARTINI: Are you going to live here, Mrs. Clark? MRS. CLARK: I am going to live in one half of the house for the summer. MR. DeMARTINI: Thank you. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2500 - Upon application of Suzanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, for a special exception to the zoning ordinance, Article IV, Section 100-40 B for permission to use an existing rooming house as a two-family dwelling. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affi- davits attesting to its publicaiton in the official newspapers, and dis- approval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: John Hartung, Louis Demartini and Helen M. Syms. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: Town Counsel has advised the Board it is not necessary to require a special exception to divide a rooming house into a two-family dwelling in the "M" Light Multiple-Residence District. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED that Mrs. Clark is withdrawing her application No. 2500 for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis and Douglass. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2502 - Upon application of Apostolos Skaperdas, 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Artlcle XIII, Sect!on 136 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers of the Town, and disapproval from the Building Inspector. The Chairman also read a statement from the Town Clerk that notification by certified mail had been made to: Ms. Nina S. Magen and Kenneth Deegan. Fee paid $15.00. THE CHAIRMAN: In the Notice to Neighbors the applicant states that they want to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 17-1/2 feet to 15 feet. This is one of the lots in Pebble Beach Farms facing on the sound. SOUTHOLD. TO~ BOARD OF APPEALS -16- December 21, 1978 of something and we are not. You cannot take a vote and decide you are 'n gol g to change the Ordinance. We would like to help, but I do not see ~ how we can. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this? (there was no response). Does anyone else have any questions? (there was no response). After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appli- cant wishes to reduce the required side yard setbacks by an additional 2-1/2 feet. This lot is in a."cluster zone" subdivision which allows the side yard setback requirements to be reduced up to 50 percent. The findings of the Board are that they are not authorized to vary the cluster subdivision side yard requirements more than 50 percent. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will change the character of the neighborhood and will not observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion of Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED that Apostolos Skaperdas, 310 Merrick Avenue, Merrick, New York, be DENIED permission to construct a house with reduced side yard setback. Location of property: Lot No. 130, Map No. 6266, Map of Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Tuthill and Douglass. THE CHAIRMAN: This is the postponed hearing on Appeal No. 2501, Suzanne Clark. Now, Mrs. Clark can you state for us again what you will be doing since your application has bee revised since you originally filed it? MRS. CLARK: The main house which is located on Parcel A ...... THE CHAIRMAN: Do the two of you understand and agree with this application now? MR. HARTUNG: Are you talking to us? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. Have you been out there talking? MR. DOUGLASS: They didn't go out there. MRS. CLARK: On Parcel A where the main dwelling is presently located I propose to convert the rooming house use to a two-family dwelling. On Parcel B I propose to relocate cottage No. 1 and tear down cottage No. 3. I also propose to tear down cottage No. 2. Parcel C at some future time I plan to consturct a salt box, 2 story, one-family house. And a one- _~. family house on Parcel B. There will be a two-family dwelling on Parcel A. SOUTHOLD TO%'.~ BOARD OF APPEALS -17- December 21, 1978 With respect to parcels B & C, I will observe all the setbacks and side yard requirements and so on. I will also put in new wells and ceSSpools for each of the separate structures which presently share. ~ There is one well now for the property. The cottages I believe are inter-connected into a series of cesspools. THE CHAI~4AN: I think you will be able to meet all the Bulk Re- quirements except for the big house, because you cannot move the big house which is probably too close to the road. Is that clear to you, Mr. and Mrs. Har%ung? Do you understand what she plans to do? (The Chairman reviewed for the Board what Mrs. Clark is going to do.) MRS. CLARK: The only thing I do not understand is the Site Plan Approval by the Planning Board. THE CHAIRMAN: That is required due to the fact that part of this is an "M" Zone. What you have to do is take the revised plan to them and tell them what you want to do. MRS. CLARK: I couldn't find in the Zoning Ordinance the Site Plan Approval requirement applying to this. THE CHAIRMAN: I couldn't either, but this was suggested by Town Counsel. MR. CRON: If it pleases the Board I do not see why one needs Site Plan Approval with respect to a multiple residence. You already have in existence a two-story building, a two family building. You could use this for tourists or boarders. There is not going to be any change basically in the existing parcel B to the west in light of the fact you are just going to enlarge that particular part. It would seem to me that all you would need is a permit from the Building Inspector. I see no reason why the Planning Board has to give Site Plan. Approval; when there is no new site to be selected. THE CHAIRMAN: One reason I can see is that as you know the Board of Appeals generally concerns itself with dividing a piece of property into two parcels. Now, what would happen if we referred this application to the Planning Board is that they would send it back to us and tell us that it was illegal for them to do anything with an undersized parcel. So the whole thing would be in limbo. Unless we tentatively approve it here, subject to their approval, it will be stymied. It's something that is not clear in our Ordinance. MR. CRON: No, it is not clear. THE CHAIRMAN: Where we have asked for their approval on under-sized lots and they say it has nothing to do with them, the Attorney for the Town says that after this Board has created them they are legal. That is why you have a Board. This is just a routine matter. I do not think this will be complicated for you. This is something we are going to straighten out this winter. MR. HARTUNG: Are.you now saying that the house that is being moved to property B can be placed anywhere on property B? $OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -18- December 21, 1978 THE CHAIRMAN: Anywhere on property B where it meet all the setback requirements. The side yard requirements and all. MR. HARTUNG: Like a 50 foot front yard setback? legal THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. You can accomplish that there. can get the 35 combination side yard setback there also. the west, this looks to me like this will be a good 35 to your line. 25 anyway. Your plan is to put cottage No. the garage on New Suffolk Avenue, Mrs. Clark? I think you If you are on 40 feet from 1 in front of MRS. CLARK: Yes, it is. THE CHAIRMAN: If this sketch is accurate it will have this house almost lined up with the rear of the big house. You will be way back from the road. You have a driveway coming in there anyhow, and you won't want to lose that. MRS. CLARK: It would be placed approximately in the middle of the lot. I would like to ask one question for clarification. This whole thing has to go to the Planning Board for Site Plan Approval? THE CHAIRMAN: I think so. MRS. CLARK: Is there an expedited procedure? .take? THE CHAIRMAN: The last time we did it, Babs? How long does that THE SECRETARY: The last time we did it we just wrote them a letter, enclosed a copy of the decision, and gave it to the Planning Board Secre- tary and they made a decision at one of their regular meetings. Got a letter back the next day. It went right through. MRS. CLARK: When do they meet next, do you know? THE SECRETARY: I think it is the first week in January. January 9, 1979, is their next meeting. That is when they are going to have public hearings that night anyway. THE CHAIRMAN: This would not require public notice. THE SECRETARY: No. The last application didn't. THE CHAIRMAN: Is this sketch one that you made? MRS. CLARK: I just went over the lines that were on the survey. The way the photocopier picked up the buildings was not very clear. THE CHAIRMAN: I think this will be enough for the Planning Board. Getting back to a question raised by Mr. Cron. I would like to read the following: The following uses are permitted by a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided subject to Site Plan Approv, by the Planning Board , but this is not being handled as a special excepted: SOHTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -19- December 2I, 1978 this is a variance. Any other questions? MRS. HARTUNG: If the variance is granted, it is granted on the strength of the proposals? THE CHAIRMAN: It is granted.on the land. It runs with the land, not with the individuals. It is not like a liquor license. If Mrs. Clark sells this propertY the new owners can do nothing different than what Mrs. Clark is granted permission to do. MRS. HARTUNG: Then they could not sell it as it is when divided into three parcels. THE CHAIRMAN: It is not divided into three parcels. It is proposed to divide it into three parcels by this resolution we are about to make. MRS. HARTUNG: But if you make that resolution, we will have three parcels. THE CHAIRMAN: It is Mrs. Clark's proposal to alleviate her problem as far as dealing with the banks. A lengthy discussion followedconcerning What would happen if Mrs. Clark was unable to follow through with her plans. The Chairman explained to Mrs. Hartung that density would be de- creased and over-all improvement to the area. After investigation, and iinspection the Board finds that the apRlicant's application contains a sketch of the property she proposes to buy and this property has been divided into parcels "A", "B", and "C" in approximately equal sizes of. about 20,000 square feet in earch parcel. Parcel A. con- sists of 105 feet of road frontage on New Suffolk Avenue and Parcel "B" immediately adjoining to the west has 87.56 feet on New Suffolk Avenue. Both parcels have a depth of approximately 177.26 feet. On Parcel "A" there is a 22 room house which the applicant proposes.to restore and make into a two-family house from a former boarding house use. The applicant will try to rent the westerly portion of the two-family dwelling on a year round basis if possible. If not, she will rent it on a seasonal basis. The applicant plans to live in the easterly portion of the house. Parcels "A" and "B" are in a "M" Light Multiple Zone district. Located partially on Parcel "A" and "B" is a cottage (marked as Cottage No. 1) which is to be moved in front of the garage located on parcel "B". At the same time the cottages marked as No. 2 and No. 3 located on Parcel "B" and "C" will be demolished. ,~ The.conditions applied to the granting of this subdivision of land seem appropriate in the area based on the surrounding lot sizes. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would pro- duce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -20- December 21, 1978 RESOLVED that Susanne Clark, 47 Barrow Street, New York, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property with insufficient ( 1 width and be GRANTED permission to have one, two-family house and two, one-family houses on parcels with insufficient area. Location of property: New Suffolk Lane and New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, bounded on the north by Syms; east by New Suffolk Lane; south by New Suffolk Avenue; west by Hartung and Demartini, upon the following conditions: (1) The creation of Parcel "A" is conditioned upon removing Cottage No. 1 from Parcel "A" and "B" to a central location on Parcel "B" and locating it near the presently existing garage on Parcel "B". (2) The elimination of Cottages 2 and 3. (3) The residence to be created on Parcel "B" will be a one-family residence. (4) Any subsequent building on Parcel "C" shall be a one-family residence. (5) One-family residences on Parcels "B" and "C" must adhere to the side yard, front yard and rear yard requirements of the building requirements of the present Zoning Ordinance, but none of these three parcels shall be inhibited by the 40,000 square foot requirement. (6) Ail individual dwelling units on Parcels "A", "B" and "C" shall meet the 850 square foot minimum area requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. (7) Site Plan Approval of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis and Douglass. On mo%ion by Mr. Giltispie, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that the next meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M. (E.S.T.) Thursday, January 11, 1979, and set the following times on that date as time and place of hearing upon the following applications: , 7:30 P.M. Postponed hearing of Anthony Sponza, 1655 Ryder Farm Lnae, Orient, New for a reduced front yard setback. 7:40 P.M. (E.S.T.) Upon application of Gary Flanner Olsen, Main Road, Mattituck, New York, for a vari&nce in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Article VI, Section 100-61, Article XI, Section 100-112 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to convert existing building (non-conforming busi- ness building) with insufficient side and rear yards and insufficient parking for proposed use. Location of property: Main Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded on.the north by Matt~tuck Presbyterian Church; east by~ Main Road (S. R. 25), south by Lawlor, west by Mattituck Presbyterian ~- Church. BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: ,,.~ k,,,. ~ a~'~t~-~. YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: NOTICE 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance). (,Special Exception) (~l~/~P/r/fii~/~fgkfg~m'g~le~. __ 2. That the prol~erty which is the subject of the Pet~on is Iocate~adiacent~to go_ur p, rgperty and is des- cribedasfollows: A/~"~,~ /"/. t'~, .~'~'rrt ~,~ ~.c:~.~ 7~- /l,/e i. aJ ~o~ ~, ~ ..... 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning dist.~ct: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: ~ ~t~ ~ ~. That :he provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought~y ~he under-, 6. That w thi~ five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be flied in the Southold Town Clerk's ~ice at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine ~e same during regular o~ce hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: Petitioner Post Office Addr~s PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS 9L6T STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OFSUFFOLK) SS.: ~ Y~ , ff~ ~ /o~/~ . being duly sworn, depos~ and says that on the ~O~day of ~~ ~ ,19 ? ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite thor r~pective name; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current ~s~sment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post rice at ~/, ~ ! ~ ~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (ce~ified) ~r:gL:~..~) mail. Sworn to I~efore me this ~ '~:5/] day of /0 ~v ~,~ lqe L, , 19 _T_g , -- Notary Public / Term Ex~ires &?arch 33. 19~ 9 SUFFC OAK 9 400' 4 (50) 8 RD. ~0 I.SA(c) ZO 19 AvE. 8 2.9A(c1 17 535' 28 :- Z8.2 9 2.0A( c MATCI- 6 3O 30 2.6Atc~ SEE SEC NO. I10 LINE FOR PARCEI. NO. SE~ SEC. NO. llO 656 6 School 46 t6 ~ ~-.~.... /99.99 /,',,o, ~ 23,386 SO. FT._~ ~.~.,o. oo.~ · ,.- ~ SURVEY OF PROPERTY N A T NEW SUFFOLK N/O/F JOHN & ~ ~ .(~ 9~.~o, GERTRUDE ~ ~ ~ HA R TUNG SO. FT. ~ ~8.~,~ so. ~ ~ ~ MILLIKENMCDONNEll& Y ~ ' r ~' ' ,. ~.. MOL OUGHNEY ~ ~ N. ~'4' I0' 00" ~y. 192.56' NEW SUFFOLK A VENUE TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y 1000 - 117- 06 - SCALE.. 1"--40' MAY 3, 1991 32 CERTIF85D TO, SUZANNE C~ARKE TO TAL AREA = 60,549 SQ. FT.  LIC. NO. 49618 PECOM~ ~ ~E~ORS, P. C. (~) 7s5 - ~o2o P. o. BOX 9o9 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N Y. 11971 9~-170