Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2582 'R,-e/LLo,77tc~~ /'7'.5" 5/$ fi~oN1C .&, 'I .6Nt>, LAa...eG~ /.3 ~7___ ___________~____~________~11V..-4J /7,1 ~ 17'll ~cta2, ___!?:(L~ti~/J 1'-_____________ --pI v/D~fl.,~/Z?J"_-4:/lrfl /NS'~fE,__/JRc~"" lVlDr//- &/f,./ .,-e.<>----'!I6.L? 9 ~ .r8 79 Ltz,J- L;,..~ c/..J PId S/cJ-S" /0(,. AAA c/f'jd.. I I --~--_.~---_._~~-----------_._-~-_._._--_._--- --_..-----_..._-------- ----.__..~ --------.-_.. ----~~-"_._-----_._-_._.... ~--'- ". /,/-/ Legal Notice of Hearings -2- August 16, 1979 Location of property: Main Road (State Road 25), Greenport, New ~ York, bounded on the north by Main Road (State Road 25); east by Jurzenia; south by Reese and Sill; west by Drossos. 8:25 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas F. and Margaret M. Maher, 114 Locust Street, Garden City, New York, (Robert W. Gillispie, III, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Loca- tion of property: Leeton Drive, Southold, New York, bounded on th~ north by Long Island Sound; east by Markel; south by Leeton Drive; west by Molloy. 8:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of William P. Riley, ~ Smith Drive North, Southold, New York (William B. Smith, as agent)i for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 23 through 27 inclusive, Map No. 1663, Map of Goose Neck Estates, $outhold, New York. 8:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Long Island Oyster Farms, Inc., 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-93 for permission to erect an eight (8) foot chain link fence in the rear yard area. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Cherepowich, Reeve, Bohlke, Clark, Geoghegan, Kelly and Gregory; east by Manoglu, Watt, Tsatsos, Muir, Wahrenburg and Southold Town; south by Orient Harbor; %,~st by Shipyard Lane. 8:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas and Edith Perillo, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York, (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard; east by Legal Notice~ Hearings -3- ~August 16, 1979 south by Weglicki; west by Sidor. I Weglicki; 9:10 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Raymond and Anna Ciaeia, Main Road, Greenport, New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 157, 158, 159 and 160, Map No. 1124, Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York. 9:20 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Robert and Anita Feagles, 21 Colony Road, West Hartford, Connecticut, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bu~k Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Equestrian Avenue, Fishers! Island, New York, bounded on the north by Ocean View Avenue; east by Philipp; south by Beach Avenue; west by Equestrian Avenue. 9:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Herbert R. Mandel, Inlet Lane Extension, Greenpo~t, New York, (John Geideman, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to con- struct an addition to a building with insufficient side yard yard. Location of property: Inlet Lane, Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Clempner; east by Gull Pond; south by Conant; west by Inlet Lane. 9:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Clifford and Mary Eginton, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct a carport in the front yard area. Location of property: Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, bounded on the north by Niedoroda; east by Deep Hole Drive; south by Dohm; west by Deep Hole Creek. 9:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Lim-Con Enterprises, In., 1455 Vets Highway, Hauppauge, New York, for a special excep- tion to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60C2 for permission to erect a sign that exceeds the height requirements._ LEGAL NOTICE ~ NOTICE OF HEARINGS v Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provi- sions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southuld, New York, Thurs- day, August 16. 1979, on the following hearings: 7:45 ~.M. (I~.S.T.) Upon application of Frank and Del- ores Davies. 16 Rose Court, Northport, New York (Ga~y F. Olsan, Esq.), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. Bohlke, Clark, Geoghegan, Kelly and Gregory; east by Manogin. Watt, Tsatsos, Mu- ir, Wahrenburg and Southold TowS; south by Orient Harbor; west~by Shipyard IAne. 8:~5 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upm ~appllcatinn of Thoma~ ..t ~lith Perillo. ~7 Old Countr, Road, Melville, New Yorl~ (Carman, Callahan, Carman ~ Sabino, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article m, section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Ii Location of property: Great Pecenic Bay Boulevard, Lau- tell New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard; east by Weglicki; [ south by Weglicki; wesi by Stdor. 9:10 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Raymond and Anna Ciacia, Main Road, Greenport, New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divi~le property with insufficient ~rea and width. Location of p~operty: Lots No. 157, 158, 159 and 160, Map No. 1124, Peconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York. 9:10 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Robert and Anita Feagles, 21 Colony Road, West Hartford, Con- necticut, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article m, Section 100-31 and Bulk Park- lng Schedule for permission to divide property with insuf- ficient area and width. Loca- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NENV YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at $outi~oJd, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, r;as been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for ............. / ......................... weeks s~ccessiveJy, cornmencJn9 on the .....~. ................................. ................ , ........... :::..: ............................... : ............... -: ...... Sworn to before rne thi~ ..... /...~.. ............ day at / Notary Public ~1~, in Suttol# County LEGAL NOTK NOTICE OF HEARiNGs Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the provi- sions of the Amended Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, New York, public hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, Thurs- day, August 16, 1979, on the following i~oarmgs: 7:45 P.M. (D.S.T./ Upon application of Frank and De- lores Davies, 16 Rose Court, Northport, New York (Gary F. Olsen, Esq.), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art- (cie Ili, Section 100-3i and~ Bulk Parking Schedule roi' permission to divide proPerty with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 54, 55, and 56, Map No. 175, Tollewood, Matt(tuck, New York. 7:55 P.M.- (I~S~T.) ~Upon application of Greenport Unit- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenpol~, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordiearlea, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permis- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of Sound Road and County Road 27, Greenport, New York, bound- ed on the north by Brand(: east by Sound Read; south by County Read 27, west by Ray- nor. 9:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Greenport Unit- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, S~ction 100-30 C6f for permis- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Corner of County Road 27 and Chapel Lane, Greenport, New York, bound- ed on the north by County Road 27; east by Shames and others; south by Price and Main Road (State Road 251: west by Chapel Lane. 9:15 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon apptication of Greenport Umt- ed Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York~ for a special exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f for permis- sion to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Main Road (State Road 251, Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Main Read (State Read 25); east by Jursenia; south by Reese and Sill; west by Dres- S:25 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Thomas F. and Margaret M. Maher, 144 Lay rust Street, Garden City, New York, (Robert W. Gill(spic, III, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art- icle III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule foe permission t~ divide property with insufficient area and w~a~. Location of prooerty: Leeton Drive, Southold, New York, _ .b~ded on the north by Long island Sound; east by Markel; south by Leeton Drive; west by Molloy. 8:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of William P. Ri- ley, Smith Drive North, South- old, New York (William B. Smith, as agent), for a var- iance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article lit, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 23 through 27 inclu- sive, Map No. 1663, Map of Goose Neck Estates, Southold, New York. 8:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Long Islaed Oyster Farms, Inc., 2835 Ship- ysrd Lane, East Marion, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-93 for permission to erect an eight (8) foot chain link fence in the rear yard area. Location of property: Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Chero~owich. Reeve, Bohlke, Clark, Geeghegan, Kelly and Gregory; east by Manoglu, Watt, Tsataes, Muir, Wahrenburg and Southold Town; south by Orient Har- bor; west by Shipyard Lane. i8:55 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon · J~olication of Thomas and _ Edith Per(il0, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York. (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art- (cie III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard: east by Weg- lick(; south by Wnglicki; west by Sidor. 9:10 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Raymond and Anna Ciacia, Main Road, Greenport, New York (James Bitses, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-~0 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permis- sion to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 157, 158, 159 and 160, Map No. 1124, Poconic Bay Estates, Greenport, New York. 9:20 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Robert and An- ita Feagles, 21 Colony Road, West Hartford, Connecticut, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insuffic- ient area and width. Location of property: Equestrian Ave- role, Fishers Island, New York, bounded on the north by Ocean View Avenue; east by Philipp; south by Beach Ave- nue; west by Equestrian Ave- hue. 9:35 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Herbert R. Mandel, Inlet Lane Extension, Greenport, New York, (John Geideman, as agent), for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Article III, Section 100- 31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct an addition to a building with insufficient side yard. Loca- tion of property: Inlet Lane, Greenport, New York, bound- ed on the north by Clempner; east by Gull Pond; south by Conant; west by Inlet Lane. 9:45 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Clifford and Mary Eginton, Deep Hole Drive, Matt(tuck, for a var- iance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to construct a car- port in the front yard area. Location of property: Deep Hole Drive, Matt(tuck, bound- ed on the north by Niedoreda; east by Deep Hole Drive: south by Dohm; west by Deep Hole Creek. 9:55 P.M. (D~S.T.) Upon application of Lira-Con Enter- prises, In., 1455 Vets Highway, Hauppauge, New York, for a ~pecial exception to the Zon- ing Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60C2 for permis- sion to erect a sign that exceeds the height require- ments. Location of property: Northeast corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mat- titack, New York, bounded on the north by Bethany Ceme- tery Association; east by Beth- any Cemetery Association; south by Main Road IState Road 25); west by Factory Avenue and Ardprop, Inc. 10:05 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Armando Cappa and Ann Hocking, Main Road, Soothold, New York, for a variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Article VIII, Section 100-81 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to construct an addition to an · ~xisting building with insuffic- ient rear yard setback. Loca- tion of property: Old Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by Old Main Road; east by Reiter; south by Budd's Pond; west by Port of Egypt Enterprises. 10:15 P.M. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, IR(ch- ard F. Lark, Esq.) for a spec- ial exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 B(31 & (4) and C(21, for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop. Location of property: Ship- yard Lane, East Marion, New York, bounded on the north by Park, side Heights Co.; east by Shipyard Lane; south bv Gardiners Bay; west by Parl~-. side Heights Co. Dar .e~: August 6, 1979. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHDLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ITA9-3268 Sworlt, IFFOLK in said printed :ly Times .. weeks o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. ~9~ - - DATE ..Ju1~...~...19.79 'TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ApPEALs, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N.Y. . 1, (We) .T..h...o..m...a..s.....&....,_F41:,.i.t..h.....P...e..r..'.z..1...1..o. ............ of ....8..7.....O..1...d.....O..o...u..n...t..r.Y.....R..o...a..d. .......................... Nam of pellon, Street and Number (con~racA~ vendees) ......................... .M...e..1....v~....1.,1.,,e. ................................................ .N...e.W...Y..o..r...k' ........ HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ............... -. ..................... DATED July. 13t 1979 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO (X) ( ) ( ) Name of Applicant for permit of ...5.7.19...~ .o. ~ .e. ~..t...s..o...n....o..~..v..e. ............ ~..~e.....~..q~f.~..a~......¢...8..0.9..2.. .......... Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 1.. LOCATION 6F THE PROPERTY Great Peconid~' Ba~..Btvd. Residential -sf~eet Use District q~ Zoning Map ........ .s..u...t..~..9..l..~g..~.~.u..n.~.~.z~..~.~.~..~.~.l.g~.~.g.~.~.z~-2-l3 & 17 Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi.nance.) Article III, 100-~1, B~lk Area & Parking 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (Y) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop (~ ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (ha~s ng.t) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... ) ) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ,s requested for the reason that applicant wishes to readjust lot permit equal land areas and future construction. lines to ~orm zBt (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulti~ or unneces- s~¥ HARDSHIP becau~ applicant anticipates repair of existing home andI construction of future home on propsed southern portion of subject parcels. 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all prope~ies alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this us? district because subject property is recorded ~Sm~wo parcels by the official Suffolk .County Tax Map~ Township of Southold. The appeal is actually oUe of lot line readjustment in order to create an equal area balance. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHA.RACTER OF THE DISTRICT .because the proposed lot areas an.d structures conz-orm with the majorzty of the surrounding residentmal complex~ion. STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY oF~'~-~"~'~,~ ss Signature O, 1:.,81; APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, .IR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. T~..7,,~',' TUTHI LL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER doseph H. Sawick~ Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- -~TATE ROAD 25 50UTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal No. 2582 Application of Thomas V. & Edith M. Perillo Dear Henry: With reference to your September 25, 1980 letter, please be advised that on September ll, 1980, the Board received a response from the Suffolk County Planning Commission after referring all documentation concerning this project to them on September 7, 1980. At that time, the Suffolk County Planning Commission considered this "...to be a matter for local determination...," and a copy of same is attached hereto. The-Board of Appeals gave a conditional approval on September 6, 1980, and do not wish to change their position regarding this matter. If the Planning Commis- sion does not wish to approve the subdivision map as specified in their September 5, 1980 letter, then it would appear to be a ma~ter to be resolved by an action taken by your Board. Sincerely yours, CG:lk Enclosure CHARLES GRIGONIS, CHAIRMAN JR. PI TO HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr.. Chairm~n FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 September 25, 1980 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr.-Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: I am enclosing copy of letter from the Suffolk County Planning Commission wherein they have disapproved the minor subdivision of Perillo which was previously approved by you subject to referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission. May we have your position on this at your earliest convenience. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Mtm~mel Tolman, Secretary Enclosure COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING (516) 360-5207 LEE E:. KOPP£LMAN '.. Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman '~. Town of Southold Planning Board '.Main Road S~uthold, New York 11971 Re: Dear Mr. Raynori' September 5, 1980 Map of Minor Subdivision - Thomas V. Perillo & Edith M. Perillo Southeasterly side of Peconic Bay Boulevard opposite Laurelwood Drive, Laurel, New York. The Suffolk County Planning ,Commission at its regular meeting on September 3, 1980, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Thomas V. Perillo & Edith M. Perillo", referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to disapprove said map for the following reasons: 1. The Commission feels that it has no right to approve a subdivision with substandard lots. 2. The layout is poor because a 15 foot right-of-way crosses another parcel to provide access to an interior lot. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles O. L~nd, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-80-15 CGL:Jk Encl.: Map APPEAL NO. 2582. AMENDED FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION. Application of THOMAS and EDITH PERILLO, by Carman, Callahan, Carman and Sabing, Esqs., 280 Main Street, Box 310, Farmingdale, New York 11735. On motion by Mr. Tuthill, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that regarding Appeal No. 2582, in the matter of the application of THOMAS and EDITH PERILLO, by Carman, Cal- lahan, Carman and Sabing, Esqs., wherein the Board of Appeals granted a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art£cle III, Section 100-31 (Bulk Schedule), approving the insufficient area and width of two parcels located at the south side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, (more particularly known as County Tax Map Item Nos. 1000-145-2-13 and 17), that the findings and deter- mination of this Board as worded in its decision and minutes of the September 6, 1979 Meeting are erroneous, and that same be and hereby are amended to read as follows: After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that ~ applicants wish approval of insufficient area of approximately 22,457 square feet for Lot No. 1 at the north end of the premises, and approval of insufficient area of approximately 26,348 square feet for Lot No. 2, and approval of insufficient road frontage 100 feet and 50 feet respectively. The variance requested would reduce Lot No. 1 from its original size of approximately 36,000 square feet, and would increase Lot No. 2 from'its present size of approximately 15,000 square feet. The Board finds that to grant the relief requested herein would be uniform with the lots in the immediate vicinity. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicants. ~' The Board finds that the circumstances present in this case are unique, and that strict application of the ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance .... The remainder of the original resolution, which reads as follows, will remain the same: On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it RESOLVED, that THOMAS and EDITH PERILLO, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York (by Carman, Callahan, Carman and Sabino, Esqs. as agent) be GRANTED a Variance to the ZonJ~g Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31{Bulk Schedule) appro'ving the insuffi- cient area and width as applied for, and approving the access, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Southold Town Planning Board approval for a minor subdivision; 2. Suffolk County Planning Commission referral; 3. Conformance w~th the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals requirements for an access road. Location of property: South side of Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel; bounded north by Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, east by Weglicki, south by Weglicki, west by Sidor. County Tax Map Item Nos. 1000-145-2-13 and 17 .... Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill, Douglass. Absent: Messr. Doyen. Abstained: Messr. Goehringer. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2691. Application of SAMUEL B. PRELLWITZ, Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 for permission to construct second dwelling on single lot. Location of property: South side of Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York; bounded north by Indian Neck Road, west by Cukor and Fischer, south by Peconic Bay, east by Indian Neck Lane and Adams. County Tax Map Item No. 1000-86-7-7. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:53 P.M. by reading .~ the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing and affidavits attesting to its publication in the local and official newspapers, Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and letter from the Town Clerk that notification to adjoining property owners was made; fee paid $15.00. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have surveys. It shows a parce~ of, it is kind of an odd-shaped piece. It's got 227' on the southerly line, 525' on the easterly line, and then it goes 121, and 291 on the northerly line (413') and then the westerly line something like 608' altogether, I guess, is that somewhere near right, Bill? It's got a little jog in it. And the proposal is there is one house down on the waterfront, a big house, I guess it's known as the High House, or something they call it. to it, MR. BILL SMITH: Right. MR. CHAIRMAN: There's a studio-type building connected I guess, you would almost say, with a wall. MEMBER TUTHILL: It's detached isn't it? MR. CHAIRMAN: And then there is another building that's used for storage now. It's like a big garage, I guess that's all it ever was. I guess, Bill, is there something else you would like to say about this, to explain exactly what your intentions are? BILL SMITH: Only that Mr. Prellwitz had planned this for ~..quite a long time, and did plan to go into a major subdivision Sou hold Town pp als ~OUTHOLO, · . TELEPHONE (516} 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD · MEMBERS CHAR LES GR IGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. H I ~ 0 · R $ TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASS Act'~ng Chairm. an Southold Town Board of Appeals September 6, 1979 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held'on September 6, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. (D.S.T.) at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. There were present: Messrs. Chairman; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; was: Serge Doyen, Jr. Robert J. Douglass, Acting and Terry R. Tuthill. Absent RECESSED HEARING: Appeal No. 2580. Application of Frank and Delores Davies, 16 Rose Court, Northport, New York (Gary F. Olsen, Esq.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Lots No. 54, 55 and 56, Map No. 175, Toilewood, ~attituck, New- York. MR. DOUGLASS: We reconvene Appeal No. 2580. Application of Frank and Delores Davies. We have a letter from the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Davies advising us that they wish to withdraw the application without prejudice. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Tuthill, ft~was RESOLVED,'that Frank and Delores Davis, 16 Rose Court, Northport, New York, Notice of Application dated July 25, 1979 be WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Vote of the Board: Tuthill. Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, Grigonis and RECESSED HEARING: Appeal No. 2571. Application of Greenport United Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30, C6f, for permission to erect an off-premises directional .3 SOUTHOLD TOWN BO/~R APPEALS -2- S e bet 6, 1979 sign. Location of property: Main Road (State Road 25), Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Main Road (State Road 25); east by Jurzenia; south by Reese and Sill; west by Drossos. MR. DOUGLASS : We reconvene this matter which was recessed until tonight. I believe that application was to obtain some documents for us. Here is a letter from Mrs. Patricia Zeller giving the applicant permission to erect an off-premises sign. Is there any- one who wishes to comment on this application? (THERE WAS NO RESPONSE.-) On motion made by Mr. Tuthill, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that Greenport United Methodist Church, Main Street, Greenport, New York, be GRANTED a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C6f, for permission to erect an off-premises directional sign. Location of property: Main Road (State Road 25), Greenport, New York, bounded on the north by Main Road (State Road 25); east by Jurzenia; south by Reese and Sill3 west by Drossos. Vote of the Board: hill. Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, , * · Grigonis and Tut- RECESSED HEARING: Appeal No. 2582. Application of Thomas and Edith Perillo, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York 11747 (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esqs.) for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Parking Schedule, for permission to divide property with insufficient area and width. Location of property: Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, New York, bounded on the north by Great Peconic Bay Boule- vard; east by Weglicki; south by Weglicki; west by Sidor. Mr. Douglass read the legal notice of hearing which was published in the local newspapers upon which the hearing was called. MR. DOUGLASS: They have legally asked for a division of the property. Is there anyone who wishes to'speak on this matter? DOUGLASS HEINS, ESQ.: Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino. I submit to you the survey. You will note that the proposal as set here does meet the requirements set forth for the side-yard des- cription on the east side of the house by the driveway. Further we intended at that time to discuss other proposals partly with r~ference to neighbors and Mr. Weglicki and discussing with them the right-of-way with various deed right-of-wayed in some res- pects. We can discuss it and know as originally set forth to maintain driveway on the east side of the property. I suggest that in view of the shape of the property and the right-of-way, and the Burns might have something to say regarding the right- of-way. I can go into detail and just to what extent that we would prefer to go with the plan as proposed here. With that and knowing full well there will be other opposition, I will close now respectfully requesting that this be granted. MR. BURNS: The access road you have is on the east side as ~OUTHOLD TO~ BOARD~ APPEALS -3- of now. The proposed driveway. MR. HEINS: On the west not on the east. down to the house. Sept~er 6, 1979 The driveway would be~ MR. BURNS: The right-of-way on the ~ast side would remain the same. It only measures 10 feet. The deed says 15 feet. Fifteen feet to ten feet wide. MR. HEINS: We prefer to have a course that would.suit everyone. Mr. Heins did not have R copy of the deed with him but believes the right-of-way in the Perillo deed stated ten feet. MR. DOUGLASS: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak? ROGER MUNDS: I did not make the first hearing. 'I was wondering whether this application is asking for a subdivision of this property. Or just moving lines back? In my view wouldn't that denote an additional purchase of property and not just change of lot line? I happen to be an appraiser. I am not an attorney like this gentleman who must know better than I, but I want to be sure I am saying the correct thing. My question is that in my view they are creating a division of land. MR. DOUGLASS: This must be approved for insufficient area and width to permit further construction and is a request for subdivid- ing the land. MR. MUNDS: Into two separate lots in one ownership. MR. HEINS: We took it in two separate conveyances and is listed as two parcels and we are not deemed part of Laurelwood Estates. They are taxed separately. MR. DOUGLASS: I suggest that you will have to go to the Planning ~ Board for.their approval. I would suggest that we will reserve our decision an order that you may go to the Planning Board and get their decision on whether you can subdivide it. It has to go back to the Planning Board anyway for their approval. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this matter? MR. SIDOR: I would like to add to what he said. That land was neve~ intended to be a lot. It was just a parcel of land; he had it there and he didn't know what to do with it, so he sold it to the Priest, to Grochowski. He had no intentions of it being a lot. If he did, he would have had a right-of-way. There was no right- of-way to it, there was no road to it. He left it there as they have it on my deed as a park. It was supposed to be a park, then he decided he didn't need all that land so he sold it. Asa mat- ter of fact, I was going to buy it myself just to buy it, but not to build a home on it. MR. DOUGLASS: Who was that, Mr. Weglicki? MR. SIDOR: Right. gOUTHOLD TOWN BOAR~ APPEALS -4- SeptO)er 6, 1979 MR. DOUGLASS: Their neighbors here, they have theirs divided. ~ ~ MR. SIDOR: But not that piece though. MRS. BURNS: But it was already divided. MR. DOUGLASS: Did you keep yours in single and separate owner- ship, each lot? MR. BURNS: Yes. MR. HEINS: From my reading of the deeds, it would appear that they are owned by the same party. Just looking up and down the tax map, this whole section from it, all the way down towards the Town line, there are a number of divisions there. The fact remains that they were listed as separate parcels as we proposed to divide them. There is substantial square footage in each area, it's not as if we're trying to build on a pinhead here. There's quite a bit of room there and we're not anticipating building another palace or anything. A modest house, but certainly just standing on that spot one can see that there are homes down towards the water on several of the parcels in %hat area. I don't see that it would disrupt the residing area, in fact, that property I think could use a little sprucing up. I think it would add value to the neighborhood and it would be something for the Town to be proud of, too. MR. DOUGLASS: Well, when we checked it, you're right. There are properties split all the way around it, and the fact is just a little bit to the east, just outside of those properties the houses are hard to each other, pretty near. Is there anybody else? MR. MUNDS: I would like to direct a question again; this is, what is the current zoning in that particular area as of today. In other words does the Town require 40,000 square-foot building lot there, or is it a half acre? MR. DOUGLASS: It's everywhere 40,000 square feet. MR. MUNDS: That's what I thought. MR. DOUGLASS: That's why we're here. That's the only reason you have an Appeals Board, for when people have a hardship so they can come to us. MR. MUNDS: I think that different areas around this property that have been broken up, have been broken up smaller than this but certainly quite some time ago. MR. DOUGLASS: Not too long ago. MR. MUNDS: Well, sometimes, the properties over South Oakwood Drive, which is a filed map, have been there considerably, quite a long time. Not that there's anything wrong with building on a half-acre lot, but does this really demonstrate a hardship? If the zoning in the area is 40,000 square feet- SOUTHOLD TOWN BOAR~ APPEALS -5- Se~mber 6, 1979 MR. DOUGLASS: The zoning in Southold Town is 40,000 square feet. But that is not something that is in an area like this, where a sur- rounding area is subdivided to less than that. It is a hardship to a man if he has to maintain an acre and everybody else can work on a half or a third. · MR. GRIGONIS: Of course, recently it changed quite a bit, and the chances are if we were to deny it to him, and he went to Court, the Court would uphold him instead of us. MR. MUNDS: I was only bringing up the terminology that you had used, and that is "hardship." That's what I was mulling over. If a man is buying the property as such and the immediate character of the neighborhood, Mr. Burns has his in single and separate owner- ship, three of the lots; this is a single piece in my view. Now I'm not an attorney. Mr. Sidor and I believe his brother, I believe they are separate; going all the way down. And the property that was just sold that was Mr. Weglicki's is a single piece all the way down. So, quite a bit of the area is not broken up into half acres, so I'm not really sure that the whole area around there is being broken up. I mean if both sides were definitely half acres, or third, or quarter or something, I think it's demonstrating on both sides that there are some houses close by and some that aren't. If a man is buying the property and wishes to sell it off, is that really a hardship. I mean he his buying it as an entire piece and he would like to subdivide it. MR. DOUGLASS: Well, I can't read his mind about why he bought it, or why he bought it the way he did. MR. HEINS: Mr. Chairman, just to flesh out the picture a little bit. The present intention is to fix up the back house, and in the future when Mr. Perillo sees fit to move forward, and the inten- tion at ~h~s point i~ to have Hrs. ~erilio's mother move into the ~ . back house. But that is really only almost compensation though because as a technical matter you've got other concerns, whether it's Mr. Perillo's mother or someone, it's pretty much the same situation. And I just stand on the other comraents, where appar- ently you have other parties that we'll have to seek approval from. I fail to see in any way if this is carried out how it disrupts this area. ,~ MR. DOUGLASS: Do you understand that if we approve this on that access, that you have to meet certain Standards on that ac- cess before you can get any building permission at all? MR. HEINS: We are fully aware, Mr. Chairman, that any approval here and any future plans will be subject to the approval of the various regulatory bodies. MR. DOUGLASS: I mean, we have regulations in what we will accept for an access road and so on. It has to be a minimum of certain paved for a 15-foot width. MR. HEINS: We are prepared to meet those requirements. SQUTHOLD ToWN BOARD APPEALS -6- move. Sep~er 6, 1979 I'll accept a motion if anybody would care to ~C' After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant wishes approval of the insufficient area and width and approval of access and that the property had been previously subdivided by the Planning Board before the lots became merged due to the same ownership. The applicant wishes to enlarge the rear lot to 15,000 square feet, more or less and decrease the front lot to 36,000 square feet, more or less. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood and,will o~serve the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion made by Mr. Grigonzs, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, that Thomas and Edith Perillo, 87 Old Country Road, Melville, New York (Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esqs. as agent) be GRANTED a variance to the Zoning Ordinance · Article III, Section 100-31 Bulk and Parking Schedule approv- '~ ing the insufficient area and width as designated in the appli~ 'cation, and approving the access subject to the following CONDITIONS: (1) Southold Town Planning Board approval for a minor subdivision of ~he subjeot property; (2) Suffolk County Planning Commission approval; (3) Conformance with the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals requirements for an access road. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Douglass, Grigonis and Tuthill. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2591. Upon application of Diane Gazza, c/o North Fork Equities, Inc., North Road, South- old, New York 11971, for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, O P LD HENRY E. RAYNOR,~..Chairm~ FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI,~. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 April 10, 1980 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the application and sketch map of Thomas V. Perillo and Edith M. Perillo at its regular meeting on April 7th. In the determination of the Board of Appeals it was stated that the property had been previously subdivided by the Planning Board before the lots became merged due to same ownership on both lots. The Planning Board has no record of this subdivision and w~uld like information from your Board regarding this state- ment. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary O O 9/14/79 9/14/79 9/28/79 Mailed copy of access road rules to applicant's attorney. ~ Mailed copy of Planning Board forms~ to applicant for their processing, f~ 9/~S~oopy of Decision to applicant's attorney after approval. COMMISSION Seth A. Hubbard l~c I:. Kop~lman Director of P~nn/ng Suffolk County Department of Planning ~/etera~ ~llemorG21 ll~$hwa~ JOHN V.N. KLEIN. County Executive Hauppauge, L. I., N. Y. 979-2918 11787 Town of Southold Bo~d of Appeals SePtember 11, 1979 Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to' 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, tka.fO!low~ng applications whi6h have been referred to the Suffolk County P!anninE Commission are considered to be amatter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a .disaPproval. ~pplicant Municipal File Number Greenport United Methodist Church ~homas & Edith Perillo l~chard Praetorius Frances N. Frisbie 2571 2582, 2586 2588 OCN:Jk Very truly yours, Lee E, Koppelman Director of Planning CHZ£F PLANNER TOWN CLERK 765-3783 Building Dept. Planning Bd. 765-2660 Board of Appeals TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Pursuant to the General Municipal Law, Chapter 24, of the Consolidated Laws, Article 12--B, Sections 239-I and m0 the Board of Appeals of the town of... S~uthold.. (agency involved) hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (check one) Thomas & Edith Perillo ................ New andrecodifiedzoningordinance 87 Old Country Road ................ Amendment to the zoning ordinance Melville, NY 117 47 (AGENT: Carman, Callahan, Carman, ................ Zoning changes & Sabino, Esqs-) _X...X. .......... Special permits for approval of insufficient area and width for subdivi- sion. ................ Variances Locatio~ of affected land: .,S. ~..~..~.~.~.~s~d.~?.~.~.~.G..~.~e..~:.~.~.~?.~.C..~.`q.~..C.~Y~~9~ .................. within 500 feet of: (check one or more) .~ ......... ~own or village boundary line, or shore line ................ State or county road, parkway or expressway ................ State or county park or recreation area ................ Stream or drainage channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines. ................ ~ateorcounWownedparcelonwhichapublicbuildingissituated Commen~: Applicant was granted permission for subdivision of property with insufficient area and width. Both lo~s were subdivided before purchase by present applicant, but because same ownership is now in deed for both lots, it is deemed to be one. (Previous subdivision allowed insufficient area and width.) ($/;ned) Robert JP DouglEss ............ ................................ T/tle Southold Town Board of Appeals Date received by Suffolk County Planning Commission ................................ · .................................................... File No ................................. Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 11~'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR, TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASS ~, Acting Chairman September 7, 1979 Ms. Muriel Tolman, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Variances approved 9/6/79 upon the condition appli- cant(s) receive Southold Town Planning Board approval for subdivision, etc. Dear Ms. Tolman: Please be advised that the following matters have been granted variances, conditional upon the appli- cant receiving your department's approval for subdivision: (i) Appeal No. 2590 CELIA VITALE Location of property: N/s Bayview Road, Southold (2) ~DDeal NO. 2582 THOMAS & EDITH PERILLOt 87 Old Country Road, Melville, NY 11747 (Agent: Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino, Esqs.) Location of property: S/s Great Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel (3) Appeal No. 2588 FRANCES N. FRISBIE, Clearwater Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Location of property: W/s Nassau Point Road and S/s Clearwater Lane, Cutchogue (4) Appeal No. 2586 RICHARD PRAETORIUS, 846 West- moreland Avenue, Syracuse, New York 13210 Location of property: Westview Drive, Matti- tuck, New York. The applicants above are aware that formal applica- tion must be made to your Department before consideration may be made. Sincerel~ yours, Linda F. Kowalski Secretary ¢) 0 Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. !., N.Y. 11c3'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ROBERT W. GILLISPIE, JR., CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS August 20, 1979 Carman, Callahan, Carman & Sabino 280 Main Street - P. O. BOx 310 Farmingdale, New York 11735 ATT: Douglas Heins, Esq. RE: Appeal No. 2582 - Thomas & Edith Perillo Dear Mr. Heins: This will confirm that the hearing on the above-captioned matter was recessed until Thursday, September 6, 1979, at 8:00 p.m. to enable you to arrange for a survey and an access arrangement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, / seacreettear~. Conroy 0 O JUDITH T. TERRY. TOWN CI~RK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, L. I., N. Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 July 26, 1979 TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 2582 application of Thomas & Edith Perillo for a variance. Also included are notification to adjoining property owners as follows: Barney.& Emily Sidor, PeconTc Bay Blvd., Laurel, N.Y. 11948; Mr. Martin Weglicki, 101 85th Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. JTT/bn cc:file Enc./ Town Clerk 0 0 CAI~M~N, CALLAHAN, CAI~MAN & SABINO July 24, 1979 MS. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Variance of 2 parcels: County Tax Map # 1000-145-2-13 1000-145-2-17 Dear Ms. Terry, I enclose the following: 1. Notice of disapproval 2. Notice to adjoining owners Weglicki and Sidor with Affidavit of mailing. 3. Application for variance and appeal from decision of Building Inspector in triplicate. 4. Check to your order in the amount of $15. Please schedule this matter for August 16, 1979. WBCj r: llc FORM NO. ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE $OUTHOLD, N. Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL fo~ permit to ~ ........................................ =* *he premises loc~*e~ o* ..... ~ ............................. ~ap .................................... Block ............................................ Lot ................................................ is returned herewith and disapproved on the follow;ng grounds ..... ~.~J...~.~..~.~.~.~.~.~l~ ................. Building Insp~tor O BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold : TO: Ms. Judith Terry Town Clerk, Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 NOTICE Adjoining Property Owners: Barney & Emily Sidor Narti~ Weglicki YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (the following relief: divide o~'ooe~t"y more equa--a'~-~-(readjustment of property lines to equally balance) ). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Two oarcels belon~in~ to Father Grochowski~ Suffolk County Tax Map, Township of Southold, Page 1#5, Block 2, Parcels l~ & 17 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A~ricultural/Resident~al 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: ~ermission more e~uall.y subdivide existing parcels - total- two lots. 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signedare: Article III: lO0-~l: Bulk A~ea & Par~g 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: July 17, 1979 Thomas & Edith Perillo (contract Petitioner vendees) PostO~ceAddress 87 Old Country Rd. Melville, NY 117~7 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE NAME ADDRESS Barney & Emily Sidor Mr. Martin Weglicki Peconic Bay Blvd. Laurel, NY 11948 101 85th Street Brooklyn, NY STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) LAURA____~ ~' , residing at 70 Be~ _hpaqe Rd.. Fa~Tnin_nda]e. ~NY ] ] 7%5 , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the _2~ day of July ., 19 79 ., deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said I~ersons as shown on the current assessment ~oll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fice at Farmingdale, NY ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (r~1%~%~) mail. ,Return Receipt Requested. Sworn to before me this ~4~ day of July ,19 79 WtLLIS B. C~,,~,,'Ii, JR, _NOTARY PUBLIC, Stake of Nevz Yer~ No. 30-0371125 Qualified in Nassau County ,Term Expires March 30, 1981 Southold Town ~oard Fain Southold, ~ew York O~ ~ppeals Gentlemen: ~lease be advised that the £ollo~ir~ parcel or property: Is listed with the office that ! am connected. Thank you, LAUR'" .,j D LY \ \ \ SEE SEC. NO* r54 [[[[ ]Ifil ]1[[[111[[ [ 11[[1[ /VOTE · ·: ,%'O/VUA4£/VT 22,457 ~'' 83.~u 26,$48 ' ' MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR: THOMAS J4 PERILLO ~ EDITH Itl. PERIL/_O AT / AUREL TOWN OF SOUTHO£D SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK · ~UNAUTNONIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW SCALE= / = 50 NO. = 79 - 48E GUARANTEED TO pork 8 Ploy~round os shown on mop of "Loure/wood ,, $. 5595 £sfotos C. File No. PECO/V/C BAY YOUNG s YOUNG AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK ALDEN W. YOUNG,PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR N.Y~S. LICENSE NO. 1284§ HOWARD ~ YOUNG, LAND SURVEYOR N.~S. LICENSE N0.45893