Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-03/22/1991APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1:809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoM, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5!.6) 765-1800 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 1991 A Regular Meeting was held by the Southold Town Board of Appeals on FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 1991 commencing at 7:15 p.m. and held at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Present were: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr., Member Charles Grigonis, Jr., Member James Dinizio Jr., Member. Robert A. Villa, Member Linda F. Kowalski, Board Secretary The Chairman commenced with the public hearings at 7:35 p.m. Copies of the verbatim transcript of each and every hearing are prepared under separate cover and also filed with the Town Clerk's Office for reference purposes. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 4008 - TONY AND MARIE KOSTOULASo After receiving testimony, motion was offered by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, and duly carried, to postpone the hearing for the requested information until April 5, 1991. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4006 - ERIC AND MARY ALEXANDER. After testimony, the hearing was concluded, pending deliberations. 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3988 - ANTONIO VANGI. After receiving testimony, motion was offered by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Villa, and duly carried, to postpone the hearing for the requested information as to the exact setback until April 30, 1991. 8:23 p.m. Appl. No. 4013 - CARMINE AND VENUSTA CARNEVALE (V.A.F., Inc., Current Owner.) After receiving testmony, hearing was concluded, pending deliberations. the 8:27 p.m. Appl. No. 3998 - HENRY AND MARY RAYNOR. (Current Owners: Mr. and Mrs. Albert Mastropaolo). (Hearing continued on April 30, 1991 for survey to include wetland areas.) 8:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4005 - THOMAS KELLY and NANCY IANNICELLI. (Reconvened from the February 22, 1991 meeting). {Motion was made by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, to conclude the verbatim portion of the record, and continuing the written portion of the record for written communications and conclusion at the April 5, 1991 meeting.~ 9:00 p.m. Appl. No. 4007 JOHN F. GARRY. After testimony, findings of fact and determination were rendered, infra. 9:04 p.m. Appl. No. 4009 - ALEX HOMAYUNI, CHARLES KAPOTES AND OTHERS. A postponement was requested by the applicant's agent since a representative could not attend this evening. The hearing was recessed without a date. 9:05 p.m. Appl. No. 3981 - PHYLLIS RAYNE BYER. The hearing was postponed as requested by the applicant's attorney pending corrections of the Notice of Disapproval and necessary amendments to the application and notices. (END OF HEARINGS). BOARD MEMBER APPOINTMENT FOR NYS COASTAL MANAGEMENT LAW PROPOSALS. Board Member Robert Villa accepted his designation by the ZBA to evaluate and report back to the ZBA as to the effects of the proposed NYS Coastal Management Law. (Public hearing was held by the N.Y.S.D.E.C. on 3/19/91). DRAFT RULES OF CONDUCT & PROCEDURE. Linda Kowalski confirmed that she has furnished Assistant Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan with a proposed draft of the Rules of Conduct and Procedure. The draft is now under review by Town Attorney Arnoff. Copies also have been distributed to the Board Members for comments or possible changes. REVIEW OF APPL. NO. 3643 - EUGENE PERINO. The Board members reviewed the Perinos request dated February 21, 1991 as to whether or not a formal application would be needed concerning a proposed stairway construction on Plan No. 1284F dated March 16, 1990, and as approved by the Southold Town Trustees under Permit No. 3864 dated September 28, 1990. The following resolution was adopted: On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the proposed construction (stairway with ramp and landing) as shown on (Eugene Perino) Plan No. 1284F dated March 16, 1990, and as approved by the Southold Town Trustees under Permit No. 3864 dated September 28, 1990 is clarified under ZBA Conditions No. 1 and 2, ZBA decision under Appl. No. 3643, dated September 10, 1987 as not requiring an additional variance application, provided that the stairway be of common 4 x 4 post construction, as applied, and subject to compoliance with the conditions and requirements of the Town Trustees permit(s). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Ail. This resolution was duly adopted. HEARINGS CALENDAR FOR FRIDAY, APRIL 5, 1991: On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to calendar and authorize advertising of the following matters for public hearings to be held on FRIDAY, APRIL 5, 1991 commencing at 7:20 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York: 7:20 p.m. Appl. No. 4008 - TONY AND MARIE KOSTOULAS. Variance for addition with reduction of side yards and setback from bluff along L.I. Sound at 1035 Aquaview Avenue, East Marion. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3970 - McDONALD'S CORPORATION. Special Exception to establish fast-food restaurant with drive through (or drive-up) window subject to the requirements of Article X, Section 100-101B and subject to site plan approval by the Town Planning Board. Subject lot is conforming in this General Business (B) Zone District. S/s Main Road, Mattituck. 1000-122-7-3.1, containing three acres. FIRST RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS OF FACT (NOT PASSED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF VOTES) ACTION OF THE BOARD Appl. No. 4002. Upon Application of FRANK AND DORIS GILBERT. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B for permission to construct new addition with an insufficient set back from the rear property line and less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The existing nonconformities of this property are the lot area and setback of the existing dwelling to the bulkhead. Location of Property: 1095 North Parish Drive at Bayview, Southold; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-71-01-011. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 22, 1991; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellants seek variances under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B for a proposed addition approximately 21' by 23' and proposing a set-back at approximately 42 feet (to scale) to the outer existing bulkhead along Southold Bay, all as more particularly shown on the renderings prepared by C.S. Gilbert, A.I.A. dated Nove~er 8, 1990. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 71, Block 1, Lot 11, contains a total lot area of approximately 20,650 sq. ft. with Page - Appl. No. 4002 Matter of FRANK & DORIS GILBERT First Resolution Proposal of March 22, 1991 (not passed) frontage of 100.0 feet along the north side of North Parish Drive. 3. The dwelling which exists is presently set back approxi- mately 63 feet from the outer bulkhead and approximately 107 feet to the front property line. 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip-rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. The amount of relief requested in this respect is 33 feet, or 44 percentum. 5. Article XXIV, Section 100-244B of the Zoning Code provides rear yard relief to substandard lots containing less than 40,000 sq. ft. but more than 20,000 sq. ft. of lot area to a minimum of 50 feet from the rear property line. The amount of relief requested in this respect is eight feet from the requirement, or 16 percentum. 6. It is noted for the record that a variance was granted in the immediate area concerning premises now or formerly of Bernard Kiernan (1000-71-1-15) under Appl. No. 3715. That application involved a parcel of land containing a total lot area of 29,760 sq. ft. with an existing two-story dwelling with attahed garage, all set back at 64 feet from the ordinary highwater mark and 50 feet from the existing bulkhead. On May 12, 1988, a variance was conditionally granted for a raised deck and secondary grade-level deck construction at approximately 37 feet from the highwater mark. 7. It is the position of this Board that in deliberating on this application, alternative relief with a setback at not less than 50 feet from the bulkhead, should be granted, and the following considerations were noted: (a) although the relief requested is substantial in relation to the code requirements, the percentage from the existing average setbacks in the area is minimal; (b) the relief, as alternatively noted, would be the minimum necessary to afford relief; (c) the relief, as alternatively granted, will be within the essential character of the neighborhood; Page - Appl. No. 4002 Matter of FRANK & DORIS GILBERT First Resolution Proposal of March 22, 1991 (not passed) (d) the difficulties claimed are uniquely related to the property, since the property is substandard in size, complies with all other zoning setback requirements, including the rear yard; (e) the grant of alternative relief will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town or the waterways since mitigation measures to prevent water runoff or erosion problems are incorporated into this decision as controls; (f) in view of all the above, the interests of justice will be served by denying the relief as requested, and granting alternative relief, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the relief as applied and to GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF, as noted below, under Appeal No. 4002 in the Matter of the Application of FRANK C. AND DORIS GILBERT: 1. That the addition be reduced in depth (north-south dimension) to allow a setback from the rear yard at not less than 50 feet. 2. That all steps be taken within the confines of the structure to prevent erosion toward the waterway. 3. Hay bales be wrapped around construction area during all construction activities. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer and Grigonis. Nayes: Messrs. Dinizio, Villa and Doyen. This resolution was not adopted. (SEE NEXT RESOLUTION WITH FINDINGS DENYING THIS APPLICATION WITHOUT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF.) lk DELIBERATIONS/DECISION: Appl. No. 4002: Upon Application of FRANK AND DORIS GILBERT. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B for permission to construct new addition with an insufficient set back from the rear property line and less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The existing nonconformities of this property are the lot area and setback of the existing dwelling to the bulkhead. Location of Property: 1095 North Parish Drive at Bayview, Southold; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-71-01-011. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 22, 1991; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellants seek variances under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B for a proposed addition approximately 21' by 23' and proposing a set-back at approximately 42 feet (to scale) to the outer existing bulkhead along Southold Bay, all as more particularly shown on the renderings prepared by C.S. Gilbert, A.I.A. dated November 8, 1990. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 71, Block 1, Lot 11, contains a total lot area of approximately 20,650 sq. ft. with frontage of 100.0 feet along the north side of North Parish Drive. 3. The dwelling which exists is presently set back approxi- mately 63 feet from the outer bulkhead and approximately 107 feet to the front property line. ~oard of Appeals March 22, 1991 Regular Meeting (Decision continued: Appl. No. 4002 - GILBERT) 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip-rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. The amount of relief requested in this respect is 33 feet, or 44 percentum. 5. Article XXIV, Section 100-244B of the Zoning Code provides rear yard relief to substandard lots containing less than 40,000 sq. ft. but more than 20,000 sq. ft. of lot area to a minimum of 50 feet from the rear property line. The amount of relief requested in this respect is eight feet from the requirement, or 16 percentum. 6. On-site inspections find that the subject dwelling is located closer to the bulkhead than those in the i~ediate area of this neighborhood, although the immediate area does consist of other substandard parcels improved with structures with substandard (but greater) setbacks from the bulkhead and the Bay; 7. It is the position of this Board that in considering this application: (a) the relief requested is substantial in relation to the code requirements, {percentages noted above}; (b) the relief requested is not the minimum necessary to afford relief, and there is another alternative for appellants to pursue, such as constructing along the south side of the dwelling, without the necessity of variances; (c) the relief, if granted as requested, will effect the essential character of the neighborhood and will contribute to erosion problems and runoff into the Bay; (d) the difficulties claimed are not uniquely related to the property; (e) the grant of a variance will in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town and Pecon ic Bay; (f) in view of all the above, the interests of justice will be served by denying the relief requested. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Villa, it was Board of Appeals March 22, 1991 Regular Meeting (Decision continued: Appl. No. 4002 - GILBERT) RESOLVED, to DENY the relief requested under Appeal No. 4002 in the Matter of the Application of Frank C. and Doris Gilbert. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Dinizio, Villa and Doyen. Nayes: Messrs. Goehringer and Grigonis. (Messrs. Goehringer and Grigonis felt that alternative relief with a 50 ft. setback fro~ the bulkhead should be granted in light of the noncon- formities of the lot area and width, the nonconformity of the dwelling which was created when 100-239.4B was enacted in May 1985 (previously 100-119.2B), as well as difficulties created for parcels to build on limited upland area.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk DELIBERATIONS/DECISION: ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 4007: Application of JOHN AND JACQUELYN GARRY. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIA, Section 100-30A.4 for permission to locate accessory gazebo structure in an area other than the required rear yard. Location of Property: 1285 Breakwater Road, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Designation 1000-106-08-48. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 22, 1991, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard, and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a triangular-shaped parcel of land located along the westerly side of Luthers (Breakwater) Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, containing approximately 40,000 sq. ft. in area. 2. The subject premises is improved with a single-family dwelling structure situated 65 feet from the front property line along Breakwater Road. Page - Appl. No. 4007 Matter of JOHlq F. GARRY Decision Rendered March 22, 1991 3. It is the position of the board that the location requested is not unreasonable. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded byMr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance in the Matter of the Application of JOHN F. GARRY for an accessory gazebo structure, as applied and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the accessory structure remain as a gazebo and not be relocated (except as may be permitted in the required rear yard); 2. That the gazebo not be converted or increased in size and therefore not be converted at any time for habitable, sleeping or business purposes; 3. That there be no plumbing and no electrical facilities; 4. That the gazebo not be placed on a permanent foundation. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Dinizio and Villa, consisting of the entire board. This resolution was duly adopted ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 4013. Upon Application of CARMINE AND VENUSTA CARNEVALE. Application requesting review and determination confirming or recognizing this vacant lot for the purpose of obtaining a building permit for a single-family dwelling use in accordance with the zoning code bulk set-back regulations under Article XXIV, Section 100-244 of the Zoning Ordinance. The subject lot is known and referred to as Lot 50 on the "Map of West Creek Estates," filed on August 19, 1963 as Map No. 3848, and as exempted from lot area and width requirements (Section 100-12). Location of Property: North Side of Glenn Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Designation 1000-78-2-7. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 22, 1991; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 1. By this application, applicants seek: (a) a determination under the Zoning Code that the subject premises complies with the applicable lot area and width regulations of the zoning code as applies in this R-40 Zone District for single-family residential use, and/or: (b) a Variance under Article IIIA, Section 100-30A.3, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, for approval or recognition of the lot area and width which are presently nonconforming in this R-40 Zone District. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as No. 1000-78-2-7 and is located along the northerly side of Glenn Road, Hamlet and Town of Southold. 3. It is noted for the record that: Page - Appl. No. 4013 Matter of CARMINE AND VENUSTA CARNEVALE Decision Rendered March 22, 1991 (a) the subject land is presently in the ownership of V.A.F., Inc., which acquired the parcel by foreclosure sale December 6, 1989, deed at Liber 10988 page 269; (b) the subject land is also known and referred to as Lot No. 50 on the Subdivision Map of West Creek Estates filed with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 6, 1937; (c) the Subdivision of West Creek Estates is, under the current zoning ordinance, is listed under Section 100-12 "Exceptions." All of the lots on this map are to be excepted from the lot areas and lot width as shown and designated on said map. Due to this exception clause in the code, a single- and-separate search was deemed not to be required in making this determination. 4. The survey submitted under this application shows 135 ft. (lot width) frontage along Glenn Road, lot depth along the westerly side property line of 150.83 feet, and total lot area of approximately 19,500 sq. ft. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the parcel which is currently identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as No. 1000-78-2-7, now of V.A.F. Inc. and under contract of sale to the applicants, CARMINE CARNEVALE and VENUSTA CARNEVALE, be and hereby is CONFIRMED and RECOGNIZED for single-family dwelling use, subject to all setback, bulk schedule and other zoning requirements applicable under the zoning code, and subject County Health Department and any other agency approvals which may be required at the time of submission of an application for a building permit (with the exception of lot size). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis~ Doyen, Dinizio, Villa and Goehringer. This resolution was duly adopted. ZBA DRAFT as of 3/21/91 (for Board discussion 3/22/91) The Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold hereby amends its rules of conduct and procedure to include the following: I. GENERAL RULE AS TO THE TIME WITHIN WHICH APPEALS TO THIS BOARD MAY BE TAKEN, pursuant to New York Town Law, Section 267: A. In the event the applicant is not the landowner, that person or party must, before the application is deemed complete and further processed, submit written proof that he or she is either: (1) an aggrieved person or party, or (2) is an officer, department, board, agency, or bureau of the town, or (3) authorized by the landowner(s) to make the application, or (4) a contract vendee of the land in question. B. In cases of appeals, variances, notices of appeals, and/or interpretations, a written order, requirement, decision, or determination of an official charged with the enforcement of the zoning regulations must be filed, together with all of the papers which constitute the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. C. In the event that a written order, requirement, decision, or determination, noted in paragraph B, supra, is affected by an amendment to the application for a building permit or other application under the zoning regulations, then notification must be filed with the Office of the Board of Appeals that the Notice of Disapproval is being withdrawn or otherwise acted upon, by the official or department charged with the enforcement of the zoning regulations, BEFORE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER DETERMINATION, WHICH MUST ALSO INCLUDE THE REASONS THEREFORE. D. Variances, appeals, and/or interpretations, must be accepted or filed with the Office of the Board of Appeals within the earliest of the following prescribed periods of time: Up to and (1) /Within sixty (60) days of the completion of the foundation or lowest structural supports or basement, AND (2) Prior to the expiration of the building permit, 0R (3) Within 45 days of the approved, acceptable first foundation inspection, in writing, by the building inspector; OR (4) Within 15 days after submission of the "actual foundation construction survey" {commonly referred to as second foundation survey} and written proof that, after an on-site inspection by the building inspector, same has been approved or passed the foundation for the next stage of construction, OR (5) At any time where an Order of violation, rev~tion or noncompliance has been issued pursuant to Section 100-282 or 100-283; OR (6) For projects necessitating review by the Board of Appeals under Section 100-286 where there is noncompliance or violations in existence and no permits have been applied for or validly issued, and the Board of Appeals determines that an administrative hearing is necessary, a hearing may be ordered, by resolution of this board, without a time limit (except as may otherwise be determined by the legislative board or court of law). 9:25 p.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Board members discussed updates on the following litigated matters: Inland Homes Matt-A-Mar. COUNTY PLANNING OVERRIDE: Appl. No. 3955 - DOMINICK SBLENDIDO and A. AURICCHIO. The Application before the Board of Appeals, as decided January 11, 1991 was for: (1) the interpretation regarding second kitchen facilities and its relation to single-family verses two-family uses, and (2) variance for addition with an insufficient front yard setback. Location of Property: 185 Inlet Lane, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-43-4-37. WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals rendered a two-fold determination in the Matter of Appl. No. 3955 on January 11, 1991, requiring modifications and alterations to the building construction plans for a single-family dwelling; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section A14-23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was submitted on January 23, 1991 to the Suffolk County Department of Planning, which has jurisdiction within 500 feet of an estuary or creek extending from Peconic Bay, and in this instance, within 500 feet from Gull Pond Inlet and Sterling Creek; WHEREAS, at its February 5, 1991 meeting, the variance application was disapproved by the Suffolk County Department of Planning for the reasons noted in its letter dated February 7, 1991; and WHEREAS, at a Board of Appeals Meeting held on March 22, 1991, new Board Member Robert A. Villa confirmed that he has become familiar with the premises and building areas under consideration and has personally visted the subject premises, that he has read the entire record, including the verbatim and written portions of the hearing record, and that he is fully familiar with the subject application and its record before the Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the disapproval with four reasons adopted by the Suffolk County Planning Commission were reviewed and discussed at length by all five members present, consisting of the entire board; WHEREAS, it was determined by the Board of Appeals to override the disapproval of the subject application by the Suffolk County Department of Planning, and to reaffirm the Board of Appeals decision as rendered, reiterating the same findings and reasons as noted therein; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, that the Board of Appeals hereby OVERRIDES the disapproval rendered by the Suffolk County Department of Planning, concerning the entire application filed by DOMINICK SBLENDIDO and A. AURICCHIO, and hereby REAFFIRMS its decision as rendered on January 11, 1991 under Appl. No. 3955, with conditions and modifications for single-family dwelling construction and occupancy, and modifications in the approval of front entry. OTHER MATTERS FOR UPDATES/REVIEWS - APPLICATIONS OF: 1. Arthur Carlson 2. Linda Fischetti 3. Cellular Telephone Co. d/b/a Metro One 4. William DeLuca 5. Jessica Barnard 6. Melvin and Mollie Kuts 7. Joseph Hardy 8. Julius Ragusin 9. James DeLuca (Incomplete Application) 10. Cliffside (Incomplete Application. There being no other business properly coming before Board at this time, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned. The meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. the Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ / L~da K. owalski AND FILED BY /A~proved - Gerard P. God'bringer, Chairman - ~ ~ ' THE SOUTHOLD TC~ Town Cl~k Tov;n o~ 5otz~kold