HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-02/02/1994APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Di-i~io, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MINUTES
WEDNESDAY ~ FEBRUARY 2 ~
REGULAR MEETING
1994
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
7:15 p.m. Work Session {Reviews only - No action taken)
7:35 p.m. Call to Order - Regular Session (Full Board)
A Regular Meeting was held by the Southold Town Board of
Appeals on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1994 commencing at 7:30
p.m. at the Town Hall, 53095 Main ROad, Southold, New YOrk 11971.
Present were:
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman/Member
Serge J. Doyen, Member
james Dinizio, Jr., Member
Rober{ A. Villa, Member
RiChard C. wilton, Member
Linda Kowalski, ZBA Clerk and Secretary
I. The following matters were held for PUBLIC HEARINGS~
noted as fOllow~':
App!. NO. 4210 - STEPHEN T.
as built, side
The
Parcel
No. 1 ontains a
8,638+- sq. ft. and is i
Residential Zone District.
behalf of their applicati°n.
prepared underseparate cover for actual discussions at
hearing. The original transcript has also been filed with the
Town Clerk's OffiCe for reference purposes as needed:)
Following testimony, a motion was made by Chairman Goehringer,
seconded by Member Villa, and duly carried, to conclude (clOse)
Page 2 - Minutes
Board of Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 2, 1994
the hearing, pendingBoard
this evening. See e~d of Minutes for I
and determination later
and Detestation.
and ~
7:i40 .m.
No. 4211
of
MARY HOLLAND. Variance to
I00-30A~.3,
, and
proposed L this ~ubdivision
19.1, lot are.
is sq. ft. J
and tob widkh '( of 70.
of Thlr~ pr(
70.59 feet of and
along ~
SOuthot~.
dwellin~ and
~noted On the
Abigail~
( Please see
hearing. The
Town
Each 1Otlwil]
storage
~ion 117, Block 9, Lot
ft. Lot $1
101.41 feet of
sq. ft. in area
(frontage) of 101.25
~NeW Su~fotk, Town Of
Single-family
which buildings are
6f Occupancy No. Z~22830.
~If of the applicant.
discussions during
also been filed with the
reference purposes.~
7: No.
of
order that
there is a
pzoperty. The ChaiZman rec~mnended a .grant~ 0~ his r~quest and
moved to postpone the hearing until the" March 2, 1994 Regular
ZBA Meeting. The Chairman's. motion was seconded b¥ Member
Page 3 Minutes
Board of ApPeals Regular Meeting
wednesday, February 2, 1994
Villa, and duly carried by Members Doyen, Wilton, Villa and the
Chairman,~to alI0w time for JOhn~KujaWski to consult with his
attorney, Ribhard'Lark. (Mr. Lark was provided with a copy of
the Legal No~icebY the ZBACterk aPprOximately two weeks ago,
and there was no reply through the ZBA Office.) It is expected
that March 2, 1994 wiI1 be the final hearing on this
application, without further postponement, and that the Board
will commence' deliberations. In the interim, Barbara Kujawski
was asked to submit information concerning the lease aqreement
for the Accessory Apartment which is one of the cOnditi0r~ of
the Special ExccPti0n~ as Provided in the Zoning Code at this
time.
7
to
of
was
invited to stay
the next (and last) h~ring~.
7o. 4212 FRANK B.~ZIMMER. Special
Section 100-3~ ~r permission
Academy. of Property:
County Tax Map ParCel NO.
premises Contains I7.54 acres
District, is presently improved with
Appearing were the
and in favor
in audience were
who appeared to be in SuppOrt of the
c~m.ent). <PleaSe see verbatim
during the hearing. T~e
~been filed with the Town Clerk's OFfice
FottoWin~ testimony, motion
seconded by,ember Villa, and
(Close) the hearing pendin~
this evening). The audience was
wished since delib~rations weuld follow
8:05 p.m. 4213
ke
to
a !
The, ,
the
sa
; applicant proposes
setback. This Parcel of land has a totai lot area of i3~940+-
sq-eare feet and is located in the R-40 Low-Density Residential
Mattituck,
do have a feW questions. The hearingwasPostponeduntit
Page 4 - Minutes
Boardof Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 2, 1994
March 2, 1994 in order that the applicants coutd be given a
second notice to attend. Motion was made by Chairman
~oehringer, seconded by MemberDinizio, and duly carried, to
continue the hearing ohM arch 2, I994 at approximately 7:30 p.m.
(End of public hearings)
Agenda Item III-B: Verbal Request of Jacdb Albert for possible
advertisement of the A~Plication of Kim Campbell, Fishers
Island. The hearing was advertised for two separate monthly
calendar dates and is now in open recess. The ZBA is awaiting
Town Trustees' action Which is expected during the last week in
February at the earliest, and there is still a chance that the
ZBA hearing would need to be carried Over until April if ~he
Town Trustees relocate ~the cottagefurther away frOm its
original lo~ation due to nearbY wettands. At this point in
time, it is not known whether the maps would ~eed to be amended
for' compliance witha T~uStee requirement next month. The
Board~embers directed that the application not be advertised
until the Town Trustees' action has been received concerning the
both the Coastal Zone~anagement Code and Southold 'T0wnWettands
Code and new maps, as may be appropriate under the circumstanceS.
AGENDA ITEMS I II-A & C:
On motion by Chairman Goehringer, secondnd by Me~0er
Wilton, it was:
RESOLVED, to ADVERTISE new public hearings to be held by
the SQUTHOLD TO,tN BOARD OF APPEALS on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 1994
Clerk,.fOr publication on FebrUary 17, 1994 in the local and
official newspaper of the Town.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen,
Dinizio, Wilton and Villa. This resolution was'dutyadopted.
UPDATES/MISCELLANEOUS:
Town Co~ittee Meetings: None set (as of 2/1/94).
Association of Towns Meeting in ~VfC is 2/21 - 2/23.
Southotd Town Board of Appeals -5- February 2, 1994 Regular Meeting
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516)765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
January 5, 1994
S.E.Q.R.A.
TYPE II ACTION DECLARATION
Appeal No. 4211
Project/Applicants: Mary E. Holland
County Tax Map No. 1000- 117-9-19.1
Location of Project: 415 lhird St. & Jackson St., New Suffolk. NY
Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project:
Subdivide 10t with insufficient width, depth and area
This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
· implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S.
Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental
Conservation Law and Local Law ~44-4 of the Town of Southold.
An Environmental Assessment (Short) Formhas been
submitted; however, Section 617.13 'of 6 NYCRR Part 616, and
Section 8-0113 of the Environmental Conservation Law, this
variance application falls under the Type II classification as
established by law. Further, this Department may not be an
involved agency under SEQRA {Section 617.13(a) as amended
February 14, 1990}.
Although this action isctassified as Type II for this
variance applic-ation under SEQRA {specifically 617.13, 616.3(j),
and 617.2(jj)}, this determination shall have no affect upon any
other agency's interest or SEQRA determination as an involved
agency.
For further information, please contact theOffice of the
Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold NM 11971 at
(516) 765-1809. '
Original posted on Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Hall
Copies to applicant or his agent and individual board members.
Copy placed in ZBA project file for record purposes.
Page 6 - Minutes
Regular Meeting of February 2, 1994
Southold Town Board of Appeals
ACTION OF THE BQARD OF APPEALS
Appl. No. 4211.
Upon Application of MARY ~OLLAND. Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III-A, SectiOn 100-30A.3, appealing
the Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and
requesting approval of the Substandard lot area, width and depth
for each of two proposed lots in this proposed subdivision
application. Subject premises is identified on theSuffolk
County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 117, Block 9, Lot
19.I, containing a total lot area of 14,300+- sq. ft. Lot ~1
is proposed at 7153+- sq. ft. in area, 101.41 feet of lot depth
and lot width (frontage) of 70.59 feet along the westerly side
of Third Street. Lot ~2 is proposed at 7147+- sq. ft. in area,
70.59 feet of lot depth and lot width (frontage) .of 101.25 feet
along the northerly Side of jackson Street, New Suffolk, Town of
S~ut~old. Each lot, as proposed, will contain a preexisting
single-family dwelling and accessory storage building, which
buildings are noted on the Pre-Existing Certificate of Occupancy
No. Z-22830.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 2, 1994, and
all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony
recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentatien submitted c0ncer~ing this application; and
WHEREAS, Beard Members have personally viewed and are
familiarwith the premises in question, itspres~nt zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact:
1. This is an application concerning a total lot area of
14,300 sq. ft. situated in the R-40 District
along the northeEty side of Jackson Street, Town of
SouthOld, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk CoUnty
Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 117, Block 9, Lot 19.1.
2. The most southerly half of the subject pr~mises is
improved with a one-story, single-family 'dwelling Which is
situated approximately 26 feet fr°m the front property line
Page 7 - Minutes
Matter of N~RY HOLLAND
Decision Rendered February 2, 1994
along Jackson Street, approximately 18 feet from the proposed
as the westerly yard, improved with an existing tool shed
~tructure approximately one foot from the property line at its
toseSt point~ The' dwelling is Presently Set back 35'1/2+ feet
from the rear (westerly as established} property line. -
3. The most northerly half of the subject premises is
shown to be improved with. a two-story framse house with
accessory structures established in the westerly rear yard
area. The setbacks of this dwelling str~cture are shOWn to
be: (a) 10 feet from the front property line alongThird
Street; (b} 20+- feet from the southerly (propoSed division)
line; (C) 18~~ feet from the northerly' side propert!~ line;
(d) 49-1/2+- feetfrom the westerly rear property line.
4. By this variance application, appellant is requesting
Margaret Dawson}, and sUbsequently held by Frank Dawson between
January 1970 and March1986. In MarCh 1986, the present owner,
Mary ~lland, acquired the entire property by deed described a~
Liber t0000 page 363. For the record, ik is noted that the
subject premises has been in common ownership and the dwellings
have existed for more than 20 years.
5. The following variances are necessary for the proposed
separation and set-off as Shown on the June 21, 1984 survey,
amended November 15, 1993:
(a) proposed Lot No. 1 (northerly half of the total
lot) is proposed at 7,153 square feet in area, 70.59 ft. of lot
width & road frontage}, 101.41 ft. lot depth; <proposed Lot t);
(b) proposed Lot No. 1 (southerly half of the total
lot) is proposed at'7,t47 square feet in area; 70.59 ft. width.
6. Column ii of the B~Ik Schedule, and Article IIIA,
SectiOn 100u31A.3of the zonilngcode regulations (as amended
January 1989) r~quires a minimum totarea of 40,
per lot, minimum width of 150 feet,, and lot depth of ]
7. The percentage of relief sought b~ t~his application is
approximately82 percent , which is substantial in relation to
the required 40,000 sq. ~t. minimum'lot size and 52+'percent in
relation to the required, i50 lot width.
8. In considering this application, the Board also finds
and determine~:
(a) the area lots in this vicinity are similar, or
smaller, to that proposed by this application;
Page 8 - Appt. No. 4211
Matter of MARY HOLLAND
Decision Rendered'February 2, 1994
(b) the practical difficulties claimed are sufficient,
as submitted in the record, to warrant a grant of this
variance;
(c) there will be no substantial change in the
character of the neighborhood and a precedent would not be set
for the following reasons:
~1) i~u~ediately to the north and west are
parcels of character and size comparable and. similar to the lots
proposed by this application; the reSUlts of the granting of
this application will not have a direct, effect or set a
precedent for Other lots on this block; and
[2} the density of the proposed lots will not be
increased since there is a single-familY dwelling existing,
since prior to 1962;
{3} the Board Members agree that practical
difficulties claimed are due to unique physical conditions
peculiar to and inherent in the lot as it presently exists, and
the circumstances are not personal to the landowner;
(d) although the difficulties claimed were
self-created over the years, they cannot be obviated by a method
feasible for the appellant to pursue, other than a variance;
(e) the denial of this variance would result in
significant economic injury to the Iandowne~;
(f) the variance will not produce a substantial
change in the character of the neighborhood;
(g) the variance, as granted, is the minimum relief
necessary; and
(h) in view of the manner in which the difficulties
arose, and in considering'all the a~ov~ factors, the interests
Of justice will be served by granting the variance, as noted
below.
Accordingly, on motion by Member Villa, seconded by
MemberDiniziO, it was
RESOLVED, to ~RANT the relief as requested u~der Appeal
NoJ 4211 in the Matter of MARY HQLLAND, as applied.
Vote ofthe Board:- Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyens,
Dinizio, Villa and Wilton. This resolutio~'was ~Uly ad6Pted.
?
~/ ~ Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- February 2, 1994 Regular Meeting
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
..SEQRA UNLISTED ACTION DECLARATION
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
'Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
January 21, 1994
Appeal No. 3212 Project Name: Frank B. Zimmer (Zimmer Farm)
County Tax Map No. 1000- 13-2-7.8 (part of 7)
Location of Project: North Side of Main Road, Orient
Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project: Special Exception to
establish Horse-Riding Academy in conjunction with existing horse farm (with barns) in
this R-80 Zone District. Parcel c0nsis~s of 17;544 acres.
This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing
regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality
Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of
the Town of Southold.
An Environmental Assessment (Short) Form has been submitted with the
subject application indicating that no significant adverse environmental
effects are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned,
and:
{ } this Board wishes to'assume Lead Agency status and urmes
coordinated written comments by your agency to be submitted with the nex~
20 days.
{ X } this Board has taken jurisdiction as Lead Agency, has deemed
this Board of Appeals application to~ an Unlisted SEQRAAction, and has
.declared a Negative Declaration for the following reasons:
a. An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and evaluated, and/or
An inspection of the property has been made, or
c. Sufficient information has been furnished in the record to evaluate any
possible adverse affect of this project as filed, and/or
d. This application does not directly relate to new construction or
on-site improvements.
{ } this Board refers lead agency status to your agency since the
Board of Appeals does not feel its scope of jurisdiction is as broad as
the Planning Board concerning site changes and elements under the site
plan reviews. The area of jurisdiction by the Board of Appeals is not
directly related to site improvements or new buildings. (However, if you
do not wish to assume lead agency status within 15 days of this letter, we
Will assume you have waived sam~., and-we will be required to proceed as
Lead Agency.)
For further information, please contact the Of!ice of the Board of
Appeals, Town ~all, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 at (516) 765-1809.
Page t0 - Minutes
Southotd Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting of February 2, 1994
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Appl. No. 4212:
Matter of the Application of FRANK B. ZIMMER. Special
Exception under Article III, Sec~ion100-31B(12) for pe~ission
to establish new'Horse-Riding Academy. Location of Property:
29525 Main Road, Orient, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 10Q0-13-
2-7.8. The subject premises contair~ 17.54 acres locate~ in the
R-80 Zone District, is presently improved with barns and
utilized as a horse farm.
At a Meeting of the Zoning Boa~d of Appeals held on
February 2, 1994, the following action was taken:
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted into the record concerning this
application; and
WHEREAS, Boardl~embers have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question as well as the
surrounding zoning districts andland-use districts; and
~EREAS, an Unlisted Action Class and Negative Declaration
determining no adverse effects to the environment und~r the
N.Y.S. Enviro~nental Qualit~ Review Act (SEQRA)' haS been
determined by the Board of Appeals with respect to this project;
and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact:
1. , applicant seeks.aSpecial
III, sections 100~31B(t2) of the Zoning
r Board Of Appeals.~approval
a riding Stable or academy.
2. S~,hmitted under this application for consideration are
a survey amended June I0, 1986 and a sketch of a survey map
showing the ~xisting stables, paddocks, turnout ring, indoor
arena, outdoors.ring, p~ture are~, parking, etc.
3. It is noted for the record tha~:
Page 11 Appl. No. 4212
Matter of FRANK ZIMMER (ZIMMER FARM)
Decision Rendered February 2, 1994
is presen'
acres wit]
riding am
of Southol
251 and
Section
is a priv
lots.
(a) the existing use of the premises a~d buildings,
ly allowed agriculturally as ~a horse farm on 17-1/2
accessory uses incidental td the horse farm such as
training of the horses (without charge or profit);
(b) the subject premises is located in Orient, Town
.d along the north side of the Main Road (State Route
identified on the County Tax Maps as District 1000,
Block 2, Lot 7.8;
(c) running along the westerly side of the property
~te right-of-way extending north as access to other
4. It is the position of this Board that:
(a) the riding stable(s), or academy, as proposed,
will be in conformity with the Zoning Code as applies to this
R-80 Residential Zone District;
~(b) the amount of land applied to this proposed use
is more ~han adequate and will lend Go the efficient and safe
circulati(~n for vehicles and pedestrians as well as
maneuverability of the horses, stable equipment, and vehicles on
the site and appropriately located customer and employee
parking a]'eas which are established by the site plan regulations
through ~e Planning Board and Building Inspector.
(c) lighting presently does not adversely affect
neighborii~g areas and will continue to be shielded, except for
necessary security and safety purposes.
6. n considering this application, the Boardalso finds
and determines: (a) the use as a riding stable or academy for
profit will not alter the essential character of this.
agricultural area and is in harmony with and the general
purposes ~d i~tent of zoning; (b) that these uses. will not be
harmful a~sthetically or be substantially adverse tO public
health, w~lfare, Safety, convenience, or order of the toWn;
(c) that -he proposed use will not prevent the orderly and
reasonabl, use of'adjacent properties or of properties in
.se districtS; (d) the use is in harmony with and
te the general purposes and intent of zoning; (e)
tructures, equipment and material are presently and
n readily accessible for fire and police protection.
has also, among other considerations, considered
s (A) through (P) of Article XXVI, Section 100-264 of
ld Town Zoning Code.
adjacent ~
will prom,
that all
will remaJ
The Board
subsectioz
the South¢
Page 12 - Appl. No. 4212
Matter of FRANK ZIMMER (ZIM~RFARM)
Decision Rend~redFeb~uar~ 2, t994
Accordingly, on motion byMember Wilton, seconded b~
Chairman Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception, fo~ a proposed
Riding Stable 'and Riding Academy SUBJECT TOT~E FOLLOWING
CONDITION:
Lighting at night shall be permitted for security and
safety purposes ~nd such additional lighting ~ot adverse to
neighboring Properties. ~
Vote of the Board:
Ayes: Messrs. Doyen, Goehringer,
Dinizio, Wilton and Villa. This resolution was duly adopted.
Southold Town B~ar~of Appeals
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Do);en, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C. Wilton
Telephone,(516) 765-1809
-13-
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Februa~ 2, 1994 RegularMeeting
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
January 4, 1994
TYPE II ACTION DECLARATION
Appeal No. 4210
Project/Applicants: Steven Vesey & Cheryl Schlitt
County Tax Map No. 1000- 37-3-S
Location of Project: 2105 01d Orchard Rd.. East Marion. NY
Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project:
Garage in sideyard and deck in sideyard, as bui~lt
This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S.
Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental
Conservation Law and Local Law ~44-4 of the Town of Southold.
An Environmental Assessment (Short) Form has been
submitted; however, Section 617.13 of 6 NYCRR Part 616, and
Section 8-0113 of the Environmental Conservation Law, this
variance application falls under the Type II classification as
established by law. Further, this Department may not be an
involved agency under SEQRA {Section 617.13(a) as amended
February 14, 1990}.
Although this action is classified as Type II for this
variance appl~mation under SEQRA {specifically 617.13, 616.3(j),
and 617.2(jj)}, this :determination shall have no affect upon any
other agenc~y,s interest or SEQRA determination as an involved
agency.
For further information, please contact the Oifice of the
Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southotd, NY 11971 at
(516) 765-1809.
Original posted on Town Clerk Bulletin Board, Town Hall
Copies to applicant or his agent and individual board members.
Copy placed in ZBA project file for record purposes.
mc
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-14-
February 2, 1994 Regular Meeting
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James DJ-i~.~o, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Richard C; Wilton
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOAI{D OF APPEALS
TO~VN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 1~-~ Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
January 20, 1994
S.E.Q.R.A.
~TYPE_ ti ACTiO~LARATiO~,
Appeal No. 4213
Project/Applicants:
County Tax Map No.
Location of Project:
Irwin and Agnes Frick
1000- I07-7-5
1935 West View Dr., Mattituck, NY
Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project:
Construct addition with a reduction in~ the minimum setback
at the southerly side yard
This Notice is issued
implementing regulati6~s Pursuant to Part 617 of the
pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S.
Environmental Quality RevieQ Act of the Enviroranental
Conservation LaW and Local Law $44-4 of the Town of Southold.
An Environmental Assessment (Short) Form has been
submitted; however, Section 617.13 of 6 N~CtLR Part 616, and
Section 8-0113 of the ~Environmental Conservation Law, this
variance application falls under the Tlrpe II classification as
~stabtished by law. Further, this Department may not be an
involved agency under SEQILA '{Section 617.13(a) as s~nended
.February 14, 1990).
Although this action is classified as Type II for this
variance application under SEQRA {specifically 617.13, 616.3fj),
and 617.2(jj)~-~ this determination shall have no affect upon any
other agency's interest or SEQRA determination as an involved
agency.
For further information, please contact the Office of the
Board of Appeals, . ~
(516) 765-1809. Town Hall, Main Road, Southotd, NY 11971 at
Original posted on Town Clerk Bu '
Copies to applic=-~ .... .lletln Board Tow
~ ~ Ui nlS . . · , n Hall
Copy placed in ZB~ ~--~--~ ~nt_and individual board
"~u3~u~ ~lle ~or record purposes, me~Lbers.
mc
Page 15 - Minutes
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Regular Meeting of February 2, 1994
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
Appeal No. 4210:
Application for STEPHEk{ T. VESEY and CHERYL SCHLITT.
Variance to the Zoning ordinance, Article IIIA, Section
100'30A.3 for the existing, loCation of a deck addition "as
built." A portion of the deck encroaches in the side yard.
The accessory garage structure, which' has existed, is also now
partly in a side yard area. Location of Property: 2105 Old
Orchard Road, East Marion, NY; COunty Tax'Map ParcelNo.
1000-37-3-6. Subject premises contains a lot area of 8,638+-
sq. ft. and is located in the R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone
District.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 2, 1994, at
which time those whod~sired to be heard were heard and their
testimony recorded (no opposition was received); and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, the present use and
building(s), and the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact:
i. The premises in question:.
(a) is a parcel of land shown on the Map. of Gardiners
Bay Estates as Lot N0s'~ 13 and 13A (Combined as one) Wi~h a
total lot area of 8,638 square feet, and two' street frontages of
40~0 feet;
(b) is improved with a single-family, one-story frame
dwelling str~cture with attachments as more
property line, 34 feet (eXclusive of porch and Step area) from
the front property line along Old Orchard Lane, and 110+- feet
from the easterly front property' line along Sylvan Drive;
Page lS - Appt. No. 4210
Matter of STEPHEN T. VESEY and CHERYL SCHLITT
Decision Rendered February 2, 1994
(c) is also improved with a garage building, built as
an accessory structUre in the rear yard with a setback at t+-
feet from the southerly side propertY line. The deck area, now
extends "as built" into the side yard, which places a portion of
this accessory~building in the Side yard as well;
(d) is improved with a new deck area which is the
subject of this variance which extends "as built" into the side
yard with a setback at 1t feet from the side property line.
The new sideyards are 11 feet and 6 feet, rather than
13 feet and 6 feet, for a reduction of two feet.
2. By this application, appellants have requested approval
for a reduction in the southerly yard Setback by two feet, .for
an ll-foot seYhack for the new deck area (instead of the
prinCipal setback of 13 feet). The total setbacks, as built
with the new deck, are now 17 feet, rather than-the 19 feet
previously existing.
3. The code requirement for a nonconforming parcel in this
R-40 Zone District is regulated by ~100-244 of t~e Zoning Code
as it pertains to less having less than 20,000 sq. ft. enacted
in January 1989 for minimum Sideyards at 10 feet and 15 feet.
4. It is the position of the Board that the amount of
relief requested is not substantial in relation to the.
requirement, being a variance of two feet for the new deck.
No other side yard would bereduced, and the garage has not been
moved and Will remain in thepresent location.
5. In considering this application, the Board also finds:
(a) there is no valid public purpose which outweighs
the applicant's'difficulties for ~ tWo'-foot variancef0r the
southerly side, and two-foOt variance for the total sideyards;
the size of the deviation is de minimus;
(b) a substantial change will not be produced in the
characterof the neighborhood;
(c) the difficulty cannot be obviated by some method
feasible for the~applicant to pursue other than another variance;
(d) in view of the manner in which the difficulty
arose and 'the fact~that additional land area isnot available,
the interest of justice will be served by allowing the
three-foot Side yard reduction.
Page 17 - Appl. No. 4210
Matter of STEPHEN T. VESEY and CHERYL SCHLITT
Decision Rendered Februarf 2, 1994
(e) the applicant's difficulties are self-created
since the deck. was not built exactly to plans issued under the
Building Permit <921755 dated 11/3/93>;
(f) the difficulties claimed are uniquely related to
the layout and general character, Shape and size ofthis parcel
and are not unreasonable;
(g) in considering all of the above factors, the
interests of justice will be served by granting the reduction in
the sideyard, as requested.
Accordingly, on motion by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by
Member Wilton, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT the requested reduction of two fleet from
the southerly property line for the deck extension, "as built,"
with a setback at I1 feet, sUBJECT TO T~E FOLLOWi~{G CONDITIO~%
1) There be no adverse lighting - all lighting must be
shielded to the ground to prevent annoyance or glare onto
_~ghboring Properties.
2) lne~ it remain unroofed, as applied.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Mess=s. Goehri.nge=', Doyen,
Dinizio, Wilton and Villal This resolution was duly adopted.
Page 18 - Minutes
Board of Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 2, 1994
DISCUSSION: CODE and Prior ZBA Interpretations Concerning
BREEZEWAYS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS:
The: Board
the
O0-13
should
were
~ their
land
lots which
ZBA
It
does
area
are
area. Last
should
with 1
o~Iy
Board) rathe~
the fol]
Seeretary
"TO:
ng
Located in the side' r yard)
~ for'a'b~eezew~y-type construCtiOn - which may
legislative action (TOWn
stnce it 'is
%he Code~
the ZBA
~ reads:
RUTH O. and LAURY DOWD
DATE:
February 3, I994
SUBJECT: Code Discussions - Breezeway, Deck and Similar
Structural Attachment to Principal BUildings
(Sideyard)
<Continued on next page>
Page 19 - Minutes
Board of Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 2, 1994
DEFINITIONS ~100-13
PresentlM reads: Accessor~ Building or Structure - A building or structure
detached from a principaI building toeated on the same lo% as and customarily
incidental and subordinate to the principal building.~
Add the following as new:
"ACCESSORY BUILDING: A s~bordinate buitd/ng located on
same lot with the main building, occupied 'by o~ devotedt° an
accessory use. 1"
"BREEZEWAY: Open construction with a roof projecting from
the outside-wall of a building no't to exceed dimensions Of 8' by 10'
connecting the main building-and a garage." Other tYPes of
attachments Which extend more than 10 feet, or exceed 80 Sq. ft. in
area, shall not attach a main b~iIding to a 'separate build~hg untesm
such attachment meeksth~ requirementsof liVable floOr'area- 2
(COntinued)
'~ DECK: Construction attached to a buildJ~nq open to the sky
with floor materials built at an elevation above natural grade.
Decks are required to have building Permits before ConstructiOn.,,
"PATIO: A flat, leveled structure attached to a building by
steps, or other construction, and having a base floor area at or
below natural grade and'open to the sky. A patiostructure below or
at grade is not deemed to be. a deck or porch and Shall not require
building permit.'"
II. Requested "Draft" - SUPPLEHENTARY REGULATIONS ~100-230
Add new Paragraph "F" to read:
"F. EXCEPTIONS for ACCESSORY BUIL~I~GSANDSTRUCTURES.
Notwithstandinganyother~PrOvi~idn Of this ch~te~, accessory
buildings and structures in all zoning districts must com~.ly with the
location and minimum setback re~rements provided at Section I00=33~
with the following exceptions:
Page 20 - Minutes
Board of Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 2, 1994
(1) an accessory building may be otherwise located when
attached by a breezeway 2 provided it is used only for accessory
storage or garage purposes and meets all setback provisions reqUired
for the main, principal building;
(2) in the event of a change from an accessory storage or
garage use to livable floor area, the breezewa-f and garage-storage
area may only be converted by direct access between two rooms~and
made an integral part of the existing livable floor area of the
principal building for single-f~ly use°
(3) Other types of additions which connect two buildings
must meet the requirementsfor livable floor area. 3
(4) Deck and/or patio additions to a principal building
which do not connect two structures or buildings are permitted if
'they meet principal-building setbacks."
Members Dinizio and Villa at this point read the proposal draft by
Linda, since they were not able to read it prior to starting the
discussions, and agreed that it was acceptable as written. A motion
WaS made by Chairman G~ehringer, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly
carried, to accept the draft memo prepared by Linda and to authorize
the Board Secretary to forward same to the Code Review Con~nittee
Chairperson, pursuant to the requestof Code Review Chairperson Ruth
Oliva and Town Attorney Laur~Dowd. Vote of the Board: Ayes: All.
There being no other business properly coming before the Board
at this time, the Chairman declared the meeting ad3ourned.
Respectfully submitted,
~nda Kow~lski, Clerk
Board of Appeals
t CEIVED AND FILm BY