Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7158
I 80 1 eco CL C, oa/ w SP CL) rf atk [ - a�°/0 1 Ay* X1C11 S'eG f CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED ' i ( ) Tape this form too ca o a M a CL ( ) Pull ZBA copy of NE c� ( ) Check file boxes foi .. N ( ) Assign next nunbe o outside of file folde m -n m -0 g: fr W o m ( ) Date stamp entire 3x o c O m :3 D o sv file number o o ( ) Hole punch entire c X � � v m o y 3 a' z � 0- Q (before sending to' m 0-) .� 0 Cn � (Q ( ) Create new indexi; Q ( ) Print contact info 8 o C° ( ) Prepare transmittal°. --4 IM n ( ) Send original appli to Town Clerk m ( ) Note inside file fol 3� and tape to inside -n ( ) Copy County Tax N neighbors and AG ( ) Make 7 copies and -4 ( ) Do mailing label o �pf t OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ��®F s®ur�® P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Road Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1809 ® �Q http://southoldtownny.gov COMM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold RECEIVE® FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION C1 bded 9"a� a*M1- MEETING OF JUNE 7,2018 UN 1 1n2018 ZBA FILE# 7158 l.G. lel NAME OF APPLICANT: Lefkara Holdings LLC S thold Town Clerk PROPERTY LOCATION: 1070 The Strand,East Marion,NY SCTM# 1000-30-2-77 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated February 13, 2018 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated April 24, 2018. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action for a non-conforming bluff setback is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The more than code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% is not discordant with surrounding community character and is therefore CONSISTENT with LWRP. Furthermore, it is the agency's recommendation that the pool meet the 100 ft. setback to the greatest extend practical. Long Island Sound bluff systems experience unpredictable, rapid and often severe erosion during major storm events and this type of erosion, over time, may cause the loss of structures due to slope failure. In addition, the coordinator has requested that the applicant clarify that the French drain will to be connected to the pool drywell. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: This application was referred for an evaluation and recommendation. According to the information provided in a letter dated February 22, 2018, and following an inspection conducted on February 6, 2018, the agency stated that"The bluff is significantly degraded at the top, face, and toe. The face of the bluff has sloughed removing vegetation and therefore increasing instability of the bluff. The toe of the bluff is significantly scoured and eroded due to tidal forces and storm damage. There is currently no toe stabilization. The top of the bluff is overhanging and showing significant signs of erosion."Also, "The site has significant slope descending in a northerly direction towards the bluff. This grading scheme would tend to channel runoff towards the bluff." In addition, the agency recommends that there not be any land clearing within 75 feet of the bluff because land clearing would lead to increased flow and concentrated runoff causing further damage to the bluff, and further Page 2,May 17,2018 #7158,Lefkara SCTM No. 1000-30-2-77 advises that the proposed non-disturbance buffer will not be effective and recommends the maintenance of a natural yard space on the North side of the property. Included with agency response is their guide for"Stabilization of Eroding Bluffs". PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The property is a non-conforming 22,427 square foot parcel located in an R-40 zone. The parcel runs 68.27 feet along Long Island Sound. The parcel runs 63.25 feet along The Strand Road, 233.56 feet on the West side and 246.16 feet on the East side. The parcel is improved with a frame house that is under construction. All is shown on a site plan by Robert Stromski,RA, dated September 23,2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280-116A, Article XXIII, Section 280-124, and the Building Inspector's January 16, 2018, Amended February 5, 2018 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and to construct new accessory structures; 1) less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; 2)more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 1070 The Strand, (Adj. to the Long Island Sound)East Marion,NY. SCTM#1000-3 0-2-77. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct a swimming pool that will result in a non- conforming bluff setback of 74 feet where 100 feet is required and to construct a swimming pool, hot tub, and covered patio's that will result in a lot coverage of 25.1%where code permits a total lot coverage of 20%. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant on May 10, 2018 submitted a plan increasing the top of the bluff setback from the pool to 84 feet, and reducing the size of the pool to 18 ft. by 36 ft. thereby reducing the lot coverage to 24%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Site inspection and aerial photographs show that the neighbor to the East has a pool located at a code conforming 100 foot setback from the top of the bluff. The applicant submitted to the Board comparative variance relief granted to neighboring properties. In Appeal No. 4750, dated December 1, 1999, the Board granted alternative relief for a swimming pool to be located no less than 60 feet from the top of the bluff. In Appeal No. 4794, dated April 19, 2000,the Board granted alternative relief for a pool no less than 50 feet from the top of the bluff. On December 29, 2004, Appeal No. 5629, the applicant received alternative relief for a swimming pool at no less than 64 feet from the top of the bluff. Lastly, in Appeal 6027, dated September 27, 2007, the applicant was granted alternative relief of 70 feet for a swimming pool setback from the top of the bluff and required that the pool be rotated on an east/west axis, and lot coverage not to exceed 23%. The comparative variance relief was granted prior to damage to the bluff suffered during Superstorm Sandy and other major storm events. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 3, 2018 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood consists of water front properties along Long Island Sound. According to Suffolk County Soil and Water, the bluff is currently very eroded and unstable and improvements should be set back as far from the bluff as possible. Although some dwellings in the neighborhood were previously granted relief for swimming pools at non-conforming bluff setbacks (see above), those variances were granted prior to damage to the bluff suffered during Superstorm Sandy and other major storm events. The Page 3,May 17,2018 #7158,Leflcara SCTM No. 1000-30-2-77 applicant's easterly neighbor has a swimming pool with a code conforming bluff setback. (Certificate of Occupancy No. 37599, dated June 11, 2015) Properties with non-conforming lot coverages are not characteristic of this neighborhood. 2. Town Law V67-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant has space to build a swimming pool and hot tub at a code conforming bluff setback. The applicant can make design changes to achieve a code conforming lot coverage. The applicant's property was a vacant building lot until the applicant started construction on the new dwelling. The applicant, therefore, had the opportunity to design a dwelling and swimming pool which conforms to the code required setbacks and lot coverage. 3. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances denied herein are mathematically substantial, representing 26% for the proposed 74 foot bluff setback or 16% relief for the 84 foot bluff setback and 20% relief for the proposed non- conforming lot coverage. 4. Town Law t 267-b(3)(b)(4). Evidence has been submitted by the LWRP coordinator and Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District confirming that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the bluff and therefore on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood(see above). 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law X267-b. Grant of the requested relief IS NOT the minimum action necessary to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a swimming pool while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to DENY as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes,Acampora, and Planamento: This Resolution was dul adopted (4-0). Z� eslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson ir Approved for filing 6 / D /2018 REMOVE PRIVET+INVASIVE MATERIAL \ I . / / II /iIII / / i / "AY 20118 N1 , voo u^ i REPLACE WITCMORELLA PENSYLVANICA 5'-0"O.C.+VACINIUM ANGUSTIFO UM @ 3'0O.C.-EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 7-T377 COARD 0FAPPEA c7 PROPOS D SILT FENCE 13 - (SEE DETAIL 2) 14 VACCINIUM 4 JUNIPERUS? PROPOSED MASONRY 246.16 N `pANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. VIRGA IANA-8'-10'HT. EI�TICILLATA-3'-4'HT. RETAINING WALL C-11 I / I I — 10 5 MORELLA PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE M6RELLA PROPOSED LAWN PROPOSED GRAVEL _ If PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. H POOL FENCE EN$YLVANICA-4 -5'HWALKWAY 74": WALKWAY WITH STEELEDGING. + TW 62'-6 S 3924'45"E S6'-6r OP62-6ROPOSED14W. OPOSED POO PROP SED 8'DIA.X 4'HT. PR POSED FLUSH j[LFOODR + PQUIFvENTARA EE LL/FRENCH DAIN ESDET1)I+ PRPS.F. (PIPED TO LL) Ce + Ir r- r, r� r BBQ AREA � �1 e^ • c^+ + ® IL-MASONRY66.55' + 62'-4" _ --------- STEPS+LANDINGPROPOSEDg44° 81T1 + 5'-2" 12'-7" 20'-0" I 32'a" GRAVEL ON- —PD-1 SD.1 1 } DRIVEWAY DSTUNRBANCE PROPOSED 1195 S.F.\BUFFER . . . . . . . . I 21-8" LAWNI 15-1" - ON-GRADE BSMTFFE: PROPOSED53'-0" TRENCHED ACO . . . . . . . MASONRY PATIO ITRENCH DRAMASONRY 52'-8"� + ' " co . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IN ,, PROP .O.SED 4 W. 62'-7" PROPOSED VDIA.X APRON PROPOSED NDS MICRO PROPOSED 4'WCHANNEL STRIP DRAINMOWED PATH PROPOSED - 1`1IId J"1I I(I�II II I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I III I I II IY I_I'I•I Ii II I I III I I II I I I I II I I I I I I I I II I I I I III II I I I I-I I I'I I I I►I III I I I I I I I I I I i I II I I I I III I I I I II I I I I IIIIIII I II I II I I I II I I II IIIII I II I I I I I 1 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I 1 I II III I II I I I I II I I I I I I I IIIIII I I I II I I II I I I I II IIII II II I III I II I I I I I I I IIIIII III I I II I I I II I IIIIII III I II I II I1II IIIII II II III II II I II 1 I IIIII I I I I I III II II I I I I I I III I II I I II I II I I I II I I I IIII I II I I I II II I II I I I I IIIII I II II II I II I I I III I I I I I II II I I II I II I I I I II IIIIIII II II( I II I I I I I III I I II II I I IIII II I I I I IIIII I I II III II I II I I I I I I III III I II I III II I II II I I I I I I I II(II III I II II I I I I II I II II I I I II I I II II I II I/I I I II/II I I I III I III I I/I III I•I I�II I I,,I I I'IIIII�.I,I\I I,:;` . . `FLUS.H\ \ \ ® I \\ \\ \\\ \ \ -- \ - / i- - 4 1 /\ 0'H/T\ ./ D RY WIN�3 E LL WOOD POOL PATE (SEE DETAIL 1)62-6'I 420 S.F. COVERED I ON-GRADE / MASONRY PATIO I + + PRPROPOSED OPOSED IAsEMATERIALREPLACE IST-3" 53'-3" WALKWAY �WITH NO MOW MEADOW GRASS - 20'-0" 18'X 36' POOL I l I 20-5" ++ + +NATIVE TREE/SHRUBS AS (SEE DETAIL 3+4 + RESIDENCE + SPECIFIED-EXISTING TREES I FOR POOL PROFILE+ 6r-T 62•_7 FFE:63-0 T6REMAIN WALL SECTION) MASONRY 58'-7" STEPNDINGS TOC:62'-6" 10 t OSED RETAINING WALLS COVER BOX � 84'TO WATER TW 62'-7 25' PROPOSED. . . . . . LAWN 2'_6" 303 S.F. . . . I 1 62,76" 62'-S 4'-0" COVERED . I I ON-GRADE MASONRY . . . . . . . . . 3 ME NCHIER62'-S 53.{8" ST PROPOSED 121 S.F. PATIO EXISTINGCANADENSISON-GRADE PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM 13'-O\' GRAVEL PAD WTH 8'X 8' 19'-2" 40'-7' AS APPROVED BY15-0" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 JUNfPERUS - . \ ASONRY: SPA I + S.C.D.H.S.IKON- DIURBANCE 1 . . VIRG)NIANA- . . . . . . . . . . BORD10'-0" TOC:62' 62'-7" 8 BUFFER 8 ILEX . . 31'-2" IN S u2 62%+511 -�PSD VERTICILLATA ENSYLVAINICA 3-4'HT /4'=5'HT. 13'0 PROPOSED NDS MICRO ; 2'4" CHANNEL LP\+ STRIP DRAIN MN __j >ww\'. 'WPROP.45S.F. PROPOS PROPOSED 272 S.F:GRAVEL + \WOOD POOL GATE MASONRYBORDER+ + + WALKWAYW1H STEL E8 . . \ If 4,-g"� OUTDOOR � . \: , + DRYWELLBS 57'-6" SHOWER ' U- I' N — ❑II Ij❑ I `yI% II I IiiiI I I i�,/I �I�i�::.•I1i�1.�.r�,I.I:�./:'�:,I I`\•�1�6°�I I %j III iQ/I ����III%I•�"�_j��O��ImsII,II s'/ III/I I"j�I IoI I ��II'II IxII �Is iI sm/2"x4" :\ U e ��rIxiII '• . 'QPXR�O.PqOSEDFLo 1T 6" \ T\\\ \ P R!O'\P \O \S \E �DsA W ~ O; S(SEE DETAIL 1) ,O D+ TS 62-6> \ + + +TW 62'-6" TINGBOTTOM OF LUFF + 56'-6" " PLAN POOLFENCE-HI p 6LLJ LLJ +oTIE LINE ALONG APPARENT 01 ke)1 WATER MARK ON y x x—x—x— 235.56' msi N 37°19'28"W TOP OF BPROPOSED 38 .F21JANURY10EXISTING FENCE ' ETBACK FROM X I PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE` ED LUFF PROPOSED MASONRY TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED 4'H. MESH POOL FENCE PROPANIETANK MASONRY STEPS RETAINING WALL 67.80WOOD POOL FENCE 4229'54"E COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE PROPOSED SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON COASTAL EROSION AREA 60 VACCINIUM (SEE DETAIL 2)MAP PHOTO No.51-609-83 SHEET 15 OF 49 ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF 11 MORELLA / X LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. MAP PROPOSED COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Drainage Calculations a nd Structure S ch e d uO l e Lot Area 22,427 SF Drai nage Buildable Lot Area(to CEHA Line) 15,902 SF Structure Size Elevation Invert In Inv e rt O u t Allowed Buildable Coverage 3,180 SF or 20% Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100%), Proposed Gravel Driveway(758 sf @ 40%) , Proposed Dwelling with Overhangs 2,980 SF Proposed Gravel Walkway(555 sf @ 40%), Proposed Outdoor Shower(45 sf @ 40%) + Proposed Masonry Landings 72SF Proposed On-Grade Masonry(108 sf @ 100%) Proposed Pool+Spa 712 SF 3,824 SF 2260 SF x 2"rainfall (.167)=377.5 CF/8'Dia. Drywell (42.3) =8.9'depth req'd Proposed BBQ Area 60SF SD-1 8'Dia x 10'depth 10'depth provided PRECAST TRAFFIC Total Proposed Coverage 3,824 SF or 24.0% Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100%), Proposed On-Grade Masonry Patio(1195 sf @ SDR 35 PVC INLET PIPE BEARING CONCRETE 100%), Proposed BBQArea(60sf @ 100%) +Proposed On-Grade Gravel Pad(121sf @ 40%)) SEE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE DOME OR SLAB TOP 2912 SF x 2" rainfall (.167) =486.4 CF/8'Dia. Drywell (42.3) =11.5'depth req'd GRADE SD-2 8'Dia x 8'depth 2'-0"MAX TOP OF DRYWELL SD-3 8'Dia x 8depth SDR 35 PVC ❑ EJ ED] ❑ SEE PLAN �R 16'depth provided OVERFLOW PIPE SEE 11o ELEVATION LEGEND Swimming Pool Backwash Drywell PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ BACKFILL 3'-0"MINIMUM PD-1 8'Diax4'depth 11IDo PROPERTY 1 "-1 "MEDIUM COARSE o ❑ ❑ AROUND DRYWELL WITH LINE SITE DATA: NOTES: ❑ El = E] ❑ SAND/GRAVEL COVERBOX WATER SCT #: 1000-30-02-77 a ❑ 11 FG INE FG 100'SEBACKFROM 1. Base map information based on survey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — TOP OF BLUFF Lot Area:22,427 SF ( or 0.515 acres)❑ EJ o PRECAST CONCRETE SHALLOW Zoning: R-40 prepared b Nathan Taft Corwin dated STORM DRAIN RING 19 2'-0"MIN END Z0 EROSION January 16, 2007.HEIGHT AND DIAMETER o DEEP COS GROUND WATER LINE SURVEYOR: 2. This drawing is for the purpose of AS INDICATED ON PLAN SEE TYPICAL END HAZARD LINE NON-RATEABLE SOIL #4 STEEL REINFOFCED Nathan Taft Corwin obtaining permits only. NOT FORGUNITE POOL 6'-0"MIN NOTES: WALL SECTION 1586 Main Road CONSTRUCTION. CLEAN MEDIUM DETAIL+STEEL 12'-6" 12'-6. " DEPTH <5-0" >5'-0" TOP OF BLUFF Jamesport, NY 11947 3. Unauthorized alteration of this plan is a COARSE FILL SAND AND GRAVEL- DRYWELL TO BE INSTALLED Office: (631) 727-2090 violation of NYS Education Law. RATEABLE SOIL AS PER STATE AND LOCAL CODES SCHEDULE 36' HORIZ. 10"o.c. 10"o.c• TEST HOLE DATA CLEAN MEDIUM BO OM OF BLUFF COARSE BACKFILL VERT. 10"o.c. 5"o.c. (TEST HOLE DUG BYMcDONALD SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH GEOSCIENCE ON JANUARY 4,2007) PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL ROME FLOOR 10"o.c.EACH WAY EL. 52.7' 0' TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF18'-0"MAX. Ct0 C. OggSction scale -0"Section Not to Scale U- m "=10DARK BROWN LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED MAP U- OL LOAM 6X 6"TILE FACING DE _ W SITE PLAN ° z OIU WATER LINE FLOOD ZONE LINE ` di 6"T TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT MIN. HIGH WATER MARK STEFANIDES RESIDENCE a<� 1070 The Strand PERSPECTIVE VIEW U PROPOSED SILT FENCE East Marion, New York(3) #4 BARS CNT. BROWN SILTY °OGEOTEXTILE TIED TO BOND BEA ALL w SM+ML SAND AND WIRE FENCE WIRE FENCING AROUND TIES IWC.C. SANDY SILT PROPOSED 15W. OPENINGS #4 BARS 4 Q NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER Marshall tiCOMPACTED SOIL landscape architecture, pc EXISTING GEOTEXTILE 48"FENCE POST 8' O.C. PNEUMATICALLY MARBLE DUST FINISH PO Box 478 APPLIED CONCRETE EXISTINGCONTOUR TO BE BURIED , RADIUS VARIES 6"TO 2 'GRADE `_ Mattituck, NY 11952 IN GROUND, THICKNESS OF ALL ON SHALLOW END ph 631-209-2410 AS SHOWN 25"AND UP ON DEEP END marshal) Naetzel mail@mplastudio.com SLOPE 44' +54'-6" OSED SPOT ELEVATION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE S e a n '3U�ip - N 0 5 10BROWN FINE TO D- PROPONOTE: SW SED POOL DRYWELLCOARSE SANDMAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 5" 1/2 ACRE 100LINEARFEET EL. 6.7' 46, G SANITARY SYSTEM Scale 1»=10'-0" WATER IN EXISTIN 0,S=LTFENCE TYPICAL GUNITE POOL WALL SECTION BROWN FINE DRAWN BY: $eCflOn 4 SW a Ed—N.—JE A " Not to Scale section Not to Scale TO COARSE /1 ,.. J S.PAETZEL,RLA C��� sn-11 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN /; fi DATE: 2017.12.21 J SAND ` .. �' REVISED:2018.01.19 52' \ 2019.02.01;2018.03.1SHEET OF 1 2016.05.08;2018.05.144 5b\ I /REMOVE PRIVET+INVASIVE MATERIAL REPLACE WITH K RELLA PENSYLVANICA @ I / 5'-0"O.C.+VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLI M @ I / T-0"O.C.-EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PROPOS SILT FENCE i i (SEE DE AIL 2) i ` .:,>.'./i'I I1�\,5�F.\'-,'.0\r',.\:'k'I:`%\,,'t.,`//,>�.;.r',._1,\1!II 1.//\iIIIII'.j1•1 1 t;I(;1 I 1I)1II\1-4 VACCINIUM C.CINIUf/M i 4—JSUHNAIPL1E\LRO. S . 8 LEIIIIIPIIIII d �:_.•.:I'•.•aI'I\I Ia`' `� \' 4 \ \ \ \/\ s PROPOSED \ 1 R,\ O P O /©SED- MASONRY A—III I SI I —O/1_—N R—/Y / \ \ \\i s / \ _-24 6I .1 6 ' M / ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. VIRGNIANA-8'-10'HT. VERTICILLATA-3'-4'HT. RETAINING WALL — — /\\ � \0 \8 rr//5 \ p� I 9 � FF 'I \S� i I\Tl E\ / I PoIPiv h L63 1IAN- 2 0 9 -s 24rn10o. 0 -� Ir? —PROPOSED LAWN 5 MORELLA PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE 6 �6RELL �I PROPOSED 283 S.F.GRAVEL PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. ME�H POOL FENCE PEN$YLVANICA-4'5H62'-6" BIN 7•.4 WALKWAY WITH STEEL EDGING WALKWAY S 39°24'45"E 56'6" oPROPOSED 8DIA.X 4'HT.PROPOSED14"W.62'-bR OSEDLUSH PROPOSED POOLPOOL DRYWELL `r/FRENCH DRAIN QUIPMENTAREA ED 60 S.F. PPED TO DRYWELL) (SEE DETAIL 1) BB AREA �I+ + MA ONE"'BORDER PROPOS I Irr— r- r- r- r re+ + + MASONRY 66� + 62'4" ' 62-4" -------- r STEPS+LANDING PROPOGRAVSED 441817E - } I 12' " NON5-2. 20-01 S -1 DG`STURBANCE + } DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 195 S.F.LAWNI :\BUFFER 21'-8" ON-GRADE 53'-0" PGR `OO zP ` � � O: 7�Srt'E. D MASONRY PATIO + ® PROPOSED ACO +53'-3" MASONRY , �o - +1,5 `2 ' -. /8 " I/TRENCH DRAIN APRON 01 r 62'-T PROPOSED NDS MICRO TW 62'-7" PROPOSED VDIA.X PROPOSED 4'W' PROPOSED NW. + I DRYWELL CHANNEL STRIP DRAIN MWOOD POOL ATE OWED PATH 62-6' PROPOSED (SEE DETAIL El El 420 S.F. COVERED ON-GRADE MASONRY PATIO REMOVE EXISTING PRIVET+ PROPOSED + + PROPOSED E L ST-3" 53-3" WALKWAY 18 x 36POOL WITH NO MOW MEADOW GRASS 20-0" I " P +t 5( - + RESIDENCE NATIVE TREESISHRUBS AS FOR POOL PROFILE+ \ I \ 62-T' SPECIFIED EXISTING TREES FFE:63'-0" WALL SECTION) - + MASONRY TOC:62-6. 8'-7" 1 EP/TO REMAIN STELANDINGS+ /10vs OSED 58'-T' 82' RETPING WALLSPROP COVER BOX I t TW 62'4 Cl) 25 PROPOSED +\ 303 S.F.LAWN 7-6" 62'6" 62'-5" 4'-0" COVERED ON-GRADE RY62'-s' MASON + 3 AME lNCHIER I PROPOSED 121 S.F. PATIO 53'8ST EXISTINGCANARNSIS- 8'. 10'HT• ON-GRADE PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM 13'-0GRAVEL WH 10'-6" 8 X 8 AS APPROVED BY SPA 19-2 + 40-7 FLUSH MASONRY 1 rI. JON5 JUNI/PERUS '-T' S.C.D.H.S. ,1 VIRGINIANA BORDER 10'-0TOC:62-5 62 DISTURBANCE,, + I+BUFFER 8 -yV HT: 31'-2" 81LEX 6 MORELLA SD 62'-5" -j ePRPENSYLVANICA- SD ' . + VERTICILLATA OPOSED3'-4'HT. /4'-5HT. 13-0" NDSMCRO 2'4" LP + + STRIP DRAIN w OPOSED 272 SF.GRAVE . PROPOSED g+ PROPOSED FLUSR 17'-6" PROP45 S.F. + + WOD POOLGATE + \ POUTDOOR+ MASONRYBOHT. WALKWAY WITH STEL EDGING PROPOSED 8DIA.X 8' SHOWER 5d'6" CL+ " 4 I+ + DRYWELLS(SEE DETAIL 1) 6 - ' 'V + +TW 62'-6" PROPOSED WOOD w BLUFFPLANTING OF 56'-6" + W7- POOL FENCE— +2.X .................77 \ w LINE ALONG APPARENT HIH WATER MARK 01 PROPOSEID 18 S\ xx—xox—x x— 235.56' N 37 19'28"W 100'SETBACK FROM JANUARY 16,2007. �EXSTx to TOP OF BLUFF SED MASONRY ZOPROPOSED 4'H.WIRE- RELOCATED MASONRYSTEPS RETAINING WALLTOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED 4'H. MESH POOL FENCE PROPANE TANK N 42°2954"E COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE WOOD POOL FENCE AS SHOWN ON COASTAL EROSION ARE60 VACCINIUM PROPOSED SILT FENCE x (SEE DETAIL 2)MAP PHOTO No.51-609-83 SHEET 15 OF 49 ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. xN IAVERAGE BLUFF 11 SYELIA LINENE AS SHOWN ON FILED PENLVANICA-7 GAL. MAP PROPOSED COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Drainage Calculations and Structure Schedule Lot Area 22,427 SF Drainage Size Elevation Invert In Invert OutBuildable Lot Area(to CEHA Line) 15,602 SF Structure Allowed Buildable Coverage(2 %) 3,180 SF Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 1000), Proposed Gravel Driveway(758 sf @ 40%) , Proposed Dwelling with Overhangs 2,980 SF Proposed Gravel Walkway(555 sf @ 40%), Proposed Outdoor Shower(45 sf @ 40%) + Proposed Masonry Landings 72 SF Proposed On-Grade Masonry(108 sf @ 100%) Proposed Pool+Spa 812 SF 3,924 SF 2260 SF x 2" rainfall (.167)=377.5 CF/8'Dia. Drywell (42.3) =8.9'depth req'd Proposed BBQ Area 60 SF SD-1 8'Dia x 10'depth 10'depth provided PRECAST TRAFFIC Total Proposed Coverage 3 924 SF Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100•/6), Proposed On-Grade Masonry Patio(1195 sf � @ EARING CONCRETE 100%),Proposed BBQArea(60sf @ 100%)+Proposed On-Grade Gravel Pad(121 sf @ 4 �0 v% ` ' ) SDR 35 PVC INLET PIPE DOME OR SLAB TOP 2912 SF x 2" rainfall (.167 =486.4 CF 8'Dia. D rywell (42.3) 11.5'de th re 'd SEE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE RADE SD-2 8 Dia x8 depth SD-3 8'Diax8'depth2-0"MAX TOP OF DRYWELL SDR 35 PVC SEE PLAN FOR 16'depth provided 11 D11 E]EI o ELEVATION) L E G E N D Swimming Pool Backwash DrywellOVERFLOW PIPE SEE o ❑ ❑ PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE ❑ o PD-1 8'Dia x 4'depthBACKFILL 3-0MINIMUM ° AROUND DRYWELL WITH PROPERTY LINE 11 E] o ❑ ❑ 1 "-1 "MEDIUM COARSE SITE DATA: NOTES:42 ❑ ❑ EJ ❑ SAND/GRAVEL COVERBOX WATER 100'SETBACK FROM SCTM#: 1000-30-02-77 ❑ D 11 INE F.G. F.G. Lot Area: 22,427 SF or 0.515 acres) 1. Base map information based on survey El E] PRECAST CONCRETE TOP OF BLUFF Zoning: R-40 prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin dated STORM DRAIN RING MIN January 16, 2007. 2'-0" ; COASTAL EROSIONHEIGHT AND DIAMETER o DEEP SURVEYOR: 2. This drawing is for the purpose ofGROUNDWATER LINE HAZARD LINE NON-RATEABLE SOIL AS INDICATED ON PLAN SEETYPICAL 00 END #4 STEEL REINFOFCED Nathan Taft Corwin obtaining permits only. NOT FOR 6-0"MIN NOTES: GUNITE POOL 1586 Main Road CONSTRUCTION. WALL SECTION DEPTH <5'-0" >5-0" TOP OF BLUFF Jamesport, NY 11947 3. Unauthorzed alteration of this plan is a CLEAN MEDIUM'__---' SAND AND GRAVEL- DRYWELL TO BE INSTALLED DETAIL+STEEL 12'-6" 12'-6" Office: (631) 727-2090 violation of NYS Education Law. COARSE FILL RATEABLE SOIL AS PER STATE AND LOCAL CODES SCHEDULE 36'-0" HORIZ. 10o.c. 10"o.c. TEST HOLE DATA CLEAN MEDIUM BOTTOM OF BLUFF COARSE BACKFILL VERT. 10"o.c. 5"o.c. (TEST HOLE DUG BYMcDONALD SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH GEOSCIENCE ON JANUARY 4,2007) PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL 18'-0"MAX. Cto C. 04�sctmpn 0' LROFILE FLOOR 10"o.c.EACH WAY EL.52.7' 0' TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF DARK BROWN LINEAS SHOWN ON FILED MAP m scale:1" 1 '0" Section Not to Scale OL -17 U- LOAM 6"X 6"TILE FACING E M FLOOD ZONE LINEZ LD LU WATER LINE io LONG APPARENTTIE LINE A�� , HIGH WATER MARK STEFANIDES RESIDEN E;MIN. �1070 The Strand PERSPECTIVE VIEW v PROPOSED SILT FENCE East Marion, New York r�Y3 #4 BARS CONT. F_ o BROWN SILTY GEOTEXTILE TIED TO BOND BEAM ALL SM+ML SAND ANDL WIRE FENCE WIRE FENCING AROUND TIES 10"O.C. .• o SANDY SILT PROPOSED 10' W. marshall paetzz I2x4 OPENINGS #4 BARS 4 NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER COMPACTED SOIL " landscape arch/ ture, EXISTING 48FENCE POST 8O.C. PNEUMATICALLY MARBLE DUST FINISH PO Box 478 APPLIED CONCRETE EXISTING CONTOUR GRADE 4 RADIUS VARIES 6TO 24Matituck, NY 11952TO BE BURIED IN GROUND, THICKNESS OF WALL ON SHALLOW END marshannaetze AS SHOWN 25"AND UP ON DEEP END mail@mplatudio.com SLOPE +54'-6" PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION LANDSCAEH 44' IT A 5 10 BROWN FINE TO SW PD j PROPOSED POOL DRYWELL PRSHA< p MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA ACOARSE SAND c `1/2 ACRE / 100 LINEAR FEET EL. 6.71 46' I1 "1c Scale 1"=10'-0'0 Al GUNITE POOL WALL SECTION WATER IN ` EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM �SILT FENCE ICSW BROWN FINE DRAWN BY: Section Not to Scale Not to ScaleTO COARSE & 0 E20 ,RLA LU D-11 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN DATE: SP-1 SAND REVISED:2018.01.19W R \ G 52' 0 � I/ r 2018 02.01 803.16 2018 055.0088 SHEET 1 OF 1 f wird, X56\ 1°o \ / i /REMOVE PRIVET+INVASIVE MATERIAL REPLACE WITH NIORELLA PENSYLVANICA @ / 5'-0"O.C.+VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM @ / T-0"O.C.-/EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 1 / / PROPOSED SILT FENCE / (SEE DETAIL 2) o m N 14 VACCINIUM / 4 JUNIPERUS 8(ILEX I / ✓ 246.16' i v N N M i I / / / / \I ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. VIRGII�IIANA-8'-10'HT. VEFtTICILLATA-3'-4'HT. I I / RETAINING WALL PROPOSED MASONRY , I / / / / 5 MORELLA PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE 3 N16RELLA I _ PROPOSED 283 S.F.GRAVEL PROPOSED LAWN u / I / g 7 WALKWAY WITH STEEL DGINGPEN$YLVANICA4'_5'HTyPENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. MESH POOL FENCE PWALKWAY 62'-6" S 39°24'45"E + 56'-6" 62'-6" PROPOSED POOL ROPOSED 8'DI A.X 4'HT. FRENCH DRAIN POOL DRYWELL PROPOSED FLUSH ' . ooo v MASONRY BORDER - ^�� 71 EQUIPMENTARE (PIPED TO DRYWELL) PROPOSED 60 S.F. (SEE DETAIL 1) I y i I 1 I I + I� �.... �.-, �W �,.,, �.�-�, FMR e" �' , � , r t"'. �" 1�`^' �„� BBQ AREA I I I l l l l l 1� 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 \. / e — + / I S 4401617"E 66.55' MASONRY ��� \ 1 1 � . l / -}- 62'-4" I � -------- I STEPS+LANDING � \� �/ \� PROPOSED NON / + / 13'-0" I 32'-11" 1-X20'-0"—► I 32'-4" ( PD- 1 ( SD-1 GRAVEL I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ DISTURBANCE I + + / / I I - I / I -1 \- - \� \ DRIVEWAY I I \ I r I I I I II II \ \ 1 1 \ \ I \BUFFER ' I / / - LAWN I , PROPOSED 1 195 S.F. / I BSMT FFE: ON-GRADE i�o \ + 15-T' I 53'-0" 1I PROPOiSE D ACO \ / \ \ / PROPOSED 1 MASONRY PATIO + +53'-3" MASONRY +52'-8" Cl) ,TRENCH DRAIN APRON I I I I I I I I 1 I I ' I 11 62'-T' /I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I PROPOSED NDS MICRO 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. I I /PROPOSED 4 W' PROPOSED 4'W. I I 1 I -- PROPOSED 8'DIA.X I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 WOOD POOL GATE / + CHANNEL STRIP DRAIN I I I PROPOSED I TW 1 10'HT.DRYWELL I I (SEE DETAIL 1) MOWED PATH 62'-6" 420 S.F. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I 1 1 COVERED I / MASONRY RE I ' I I I PATIO REMOVE EXISTING PRIVET+ � I PROPOSED I I j 1 1 � + + PROPOSE6 I I I I I i j INVASIVE MATERIAL 4 REPLACE 1. ' I I 11 ` 57'-3" 53'-3" WALKWAY ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ] WITH NO MOW MEADOW GRASS -{- 19'-0' 1 17' X 44' POOL _ +NATIVE TREES/SHRUBS AS I I (SEE DETAIL 3+4 ' I '� j I 20''5" + \ RESIDENCE ► + / I I I I I I I / SPECIFIED.EXISTING TREES I I FOR POOL PROFILE+ I \ I I 62'-7" \ FFE:63'-0" f- -62'-r' MASONRY Tb REMAIN I WALL SECTION) \ 1 I 58'-7.. + EP I I I 1 n , I \ STEP LANDINGS+ /10 I TOC:62'-6' _ \ I I , 58'.7" RETAINING WALLS / t 74 I \._ , \ // \ / MI I I 1 i I I I I I i II I I I I I I I I t 76:TO WATER I tw 62'-7" _ - I 25 j I b I . - PROPOSED \\ PROPOSED IT-0" - 2\6., j j COVERED / - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COVER BOX 3-0 � 62'-5" 4'-6" \ \ 3 AME NCHIER 62'-5" I I \ MASONRY 8'-10' I L j \ I 1 \ PATIO \ 53'48" ST ` EXISTING I I I I I I I I I CANADENSIS- \ PROPOSED 1 I \ \ __ / / f•IT.. I I I \ SANITARY SYSTEM I I I I I 1 / LAWN 13'-0�' 10,-6"- 8 X 8 19'-2" ` 40'-7" \ / AS APPROVED BY I I I I I I 15'-0" ( SPA I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I INON-_-�'I I 5 JUNIPERUS I \ I I \ + I S.C.D.H.S. I• I I 1 I I I 1 I '' DISTURBANCE N VIRGIN[ANA- I 10'-0" TOC:62'-5" 1 62'-T'I+ 8'- 0 HT: . . . . 31UFFER I y I I I 1 81LEX - I SD 2 1 6Z-5^ \ + © \ IN o + PENSYLVANICA- SD\3 62'-5" \ I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I \ 3 E 4THTLLATA ! I / 13'-0° ' 1 \ 1 \ --J - 10 H /4'-5 HT: f�---=`�- -�1 I PROPOSED \ I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I � � \ NDS MICRO 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I \ + + �. / 2'-4 CHANNEL � / LP \ Z • + \ STRIP DRAIN \ u, \ PROP.45 S.F. I PROPOSED 41'W. w + PROPOSED FLUSH \ r' 1T-6' ,PROPOSED 272 S.F.GRAVEL + + \WOOD POOL GATE > I I I I I I \ + MASONRY BORDER 4-6 , + WALKWAY WITH STEEL EDGING . OUTDOOR / Q 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , \jam �� + + PROPOSED V DIA.X 8'HT. 1 \ TS 62'-6' BS 5T-6" SHOWER 54'-6" .\ 54'-1 _ � \ DRYWELLS(SEE DETAIL 1) 1- PROPOSED WOOD 0 Z T ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \. J - + + -� 1-� +TW 62'-6" PLA�JI TING BOTTOM OF BLUFF-�'"I O I I I I I I - - _ r.i I I I I I�', \. + --}- 62,_ ., 64'3" +BW 57'-6" \POOL FENCE 0 TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \. -- \ w 01 h� HIGH WATER MARK ON I I I I --1I ��, I .-�-�- I I I i �c x x— 5c—x—x—x x x- c—x x x�x x—x— — —— . \ - 235.56' Z/ JANUARY 16,2007. I I I I I I I I I I I T �s� N 37°19'28"W �-EXISTING FENCE I 100'SETBACK FROM-----.f \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED 4'H WIRES RELOCATED �6� TOP OF BLUFF I \ PROPOSED 38 S.F. PROPOSED MASONRY \ \ I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED 4'H. MESH POOL FENCE PROPANE TANK MASONRY STEPS \ RETAINING WALL \ N 42°29'54" 67.80' \ 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I WOOD POOL FENCE \ \ \ \ COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE I PROPOSED SILT FENCEAS SHOWN II x i ROSION AREA 60 VACCINIUM MAP PH OON COASTAL o.51-609-83ESHHEET 1 OF 49 ANGUSTIFOLIUM UM-1 GAL. (SEE DETAIL 2) TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF 11 MORELLA I / 49 x LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. r MAP PROPOSED COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Drainage Calculations and Structure Schedule Lot Area 22,427 SF Drainage Buildable Lot Area(to CEHA Line) 15,602 SF Structure Size Elevation Invert In Invert Out Allowed Buildable Coverage (20•x) 3,180SF Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100%), Proposed Gravel Driveway(758 sf @ 40%), Proposed Dwelling with Overhangs 2,980 SF Proposed Gravel Walkway(555 sf @ 40%), Proposed Outdoor Shower(45 sf @ 40%) + Proposed Masonry Landings 72 SF Proposed On-Grade Mason (108 sf @ 100%) 3,924 SF 2260 SF x 2" rainfall (.167) =377.5 CF/8'Dia. Drywell (42.3) =8.9'depth req'd Proposed Pool +Spa 812 SF Proposed BBQ Area 60 SIF SD-1 8'Dia x 10'depth 10' depth provided Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100%), Proposed On-Grade Masonry Patio(1195 sf @ PRECAST TRAFFIC Total Proposed Coverage 3,924 SF 100%), Proposed BBQArea(60 sf @ 100%) +Proposed On-Grade Gravel Pad(121 sf @ 40%) SDR 35 PVC INLET PIPE FARING CONCRETE SEE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE DOME OR SLAB TOP 2912 SF x 2" rainfall (.167) =486.4 CF/8'Dia. Drywell (42.3) =11.5'depth it GRADE SD-2 8'Dia x 8'depth 2'-0"MAX TOP OF DRYWELL SD-3 8'Dia x 8'depth SDR 35 PVC ❑ ❑ o o ❑ SEE PLAN FOR 16' depth provided OVERFLOW PIPE SEE ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ tst -6 ELEVATION) L E G E N D Swimming Pool Backwash Drywell PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ PD-1 8'Dia x 4'depth ❑ ❑ o ❑\o BACKFILL 3'-0"MINIMUM AROUND DRYWELL WITH _ _ _ PROPERTY LINE ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ 1 4"-1 "'MEDIUM COARSE SITE DATA: NOTES: ❑ ❑ o ❑ ° SAND/GRAVEL COVERBOX WATER ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ LINE 100'SETBACK FROM SCTM#: 1000-30-02-77 ❑ ❑ PRECAST CONCRETE F.G. T— F.G. a— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TOP OF BLUFF Lot Area:22,427 SF ( or 0.515 acres) 1. Base map information based on survey ;o Zoning: R-40 prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin dated STORM DRAIN RING g� 2'-0"MIN SHALLOW END January 16, 2007. GROUND WATER LINE HEIGHT AND DIAMETER o COASTAL EROSION AS INDICATED ON PLAN SEE TYPICAL � DEEP END � HAZARD LINE SURVEYOR: 2. This drawing is for the purpose of I NON-RATEABLE SOIL — GUNITE POOL #4 STEEL REINFOFCED Nathan Taft Corwin obtaining permits only. NOT FOR 6'-0"MIN NOTES: WALL SECTION 1586 Main Road CONSTRUCTION. CLEAN MEDIUM DETAIL+STEEL 13'-0" 13'-0" 18'-0" DEPTH <5'-0" >5'-0" TOP OF BLUFF Jamesport, NY 11947 3. Unauthorized alteration of this plan is a SAND AND GRAVEL- DRYWELL TO BE INSTALLED Office: (631) 727-2090 violation of NYS Education Law. COARSE FILL RATEABLE SOIL AS PER STATE AND LOCAL CODES SCHEDULE 44'-0" TEST HOLE DATA_ HORIZ. 10'o.c. 10"o.c. CLEAN MEDIUM BOTTOM OF BLUFF COARSE BACKFILL SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH VERT. 10"o.C. 5"o.c. (TEST HOLE DUG BYMcDONALD GEOSC/ENCE ON JANUARY 4,2007) • .� PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL 18'-0"MAX. U 3 POOL PROFILE FLOOR 10"o.c. EACH WAY EL. 52.7' 0, TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF Section Not to Scale C, to C. U- m Section scale:1"=10'-0" OL DARK BROWN LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED MAP o � LOAM SITE PLAN 6"X 6"TILE FACING 1' j " ^• d��•�., _ • z w I- WATER LINE FLOOD ZONE LINE A L �I ..a :° •� ' _ _ _ TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT ��� ��O MIN. HIGH WATER MARK STEFANIDES RESIDENCE.- 1070 The Strand -•• PERSPECTIVE VIEW U - PROPOSED SILT FENCE East Marion, New York (3) #4 BARS CONT. w � BROWN SILTY GEOTEXTILE TIED TO BOND BEAM ALL SM +ML WIRE FENCE WIRE FENCING AROUND TIES 10"O.C. � SAND AND 2"x4"OPENINGS Q o SANDY SILT PROPOSED 10' W. Marshall paetzel #4 BARS 4NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER landscape architecture, pc COMPACTED SOIL EXISTING 48" FENCE POST 8' O.C. PNEUMATICALLY MARBLE DUST FINISH GEOTEXTILE APPLIED CONCRETE 5 - EXISTING CONTOUR PO Box 478 GRADE TO BE BURIED q RADIUS VARIES 6 TO 24' - ( ) Mattituck, NY 11952 IN GROUND, THICKNESS OF WALL ON SHALLOW END Marshall ('�aetzel ph 631-209-2410 N mail@mplastudio.com AS SHOWN SLOPE ��25"AND UP ON DEEP END —44 1 + a'- " LANDSCAPE AR HITECT R 5 6 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION C U E r ��m a. BROWN FINE TO s e a 1 ^ `� IDSCgp 0 5 10 _ - NOTE: �,. SW COARSE SAND PD-11 PROPOSED POOL DRYWELL 4i _. `pRSHq� Fq MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA �`/ 5" 1/2 ACRE / 100 LINEAR FEET EL. 6.7' 46' SILT FENCE 0TYPICAL GUNITE POOL WALL SECTION WATER IN ` EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM `� ��& r 11 Scale 1"=10'-0" BROWN FINE 2 Section Not to Scale Section Not to Scale SW TO COARSE * * s PA TZEL,RSA C P 1 1 DATE: 2017.12.21 S 1 � 1 SAND `sD-t PROPOSED STORM DRAIN �,�, oo113s� REVISED 2018.01.19 0 52' / !F OF EN") 2018.03.1 LI6 SHEET 1 OF 1 \yb\ RECEIVED i ZON? G E���AI a O�Af� ,L1 IPROPOSED SILT FENCE (SEE DETAIL 2) - �+ 17 VACCINIUM 4 JUNIPERUS 8 ILEX PROPOSED MASONRY 246.16' _ N N / ANGUSTiFOLIUM-1 GAL. VIRGINIANA-8'-10'HT. VERTICILLATA-T-4'HT. r RETAINING WALL 7 MORELLA PROPOSED 4'H' 'H,WIRE 3 MORELLA PROPOSED 283 S.F.GRAVEL'. PROPOSED LAWN PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. MESH POOL FENCE PENSYLVANICA•4'-5'H�� 62,d„ .Byy 7'•4" WALKWAY WITH STEEL EDGING WALKWAY ' ( r S 39.24'45"E + - I 62'-6' PROPOSED 14'W. PROPOSED POOL [PROPOSED 8'DIA.X 4'HT, I I I I[FRENCH DRAIN FOOL DRYWELL PROPOSED FLUSH EQUIPMENT AREA v - SEE DETAIL 1 -} PIPED TO DRYWELL PROPOSED 60 S.F. ( ) u + MASONRY BORDER �� ��► •t- + r^r"..Ln r::�n�rr P-G BBQAREA FA 66.55' I I -♦- + - 62,•4,.+ n ------ � MASONRY I I \ - - �1 + 62'-4" STEPS+LANDING � � PROPOSED NON + + 13'•5" 32'-0" --+I 20'-0" 32'rt" ( PD-1 ( SD-1 GRAVEL I 1 1 DISTURBANCE + + I --1 DRIVEWAY I 1 PROPOSED 1195 S.F. I BSMTFFE. I - I 'BUFFER 21-11° LAWN 15'7" - SJ'-0" PROPOSED ACO \ / \/s \ MASONRY RY PATIO 1 , I + .. PROPOSED .. . . . . I I I TRENCH DRAIN , N PROPOSED 172 S.F. I �' I' .I _ I + SJ'-J" ? MASONRY APRON WOOD LANDINGS � -, � � - _ � ' I I 62•T' I �PROPOSED 8'DIA.X (SEE DETAIL 5 -- - _ PROPOSED NDS MICRO I I I TW 62'•T' FOR SECTION) + PROPOSED 4'W. PROPOSED 4'W. CHANNEL STRIP DRAIN 1 I PROPOSED 10 HT.DRYWELL w) 62'.1 + 60'-T' WOOD POOL GATE MOWED PATH 62'-d" •' I 420 S.F. (SEE DETAIL 1) . . . _ I COVERED ON-GRADE ! 1 REMOVE PRIVET+INVASIVE I I MASONRY 1 MATERIAL REPLACE WITH REMOVE EXISTING PRIVET+ I I PATIO 1 ! 1 ORELLA PENSYLVANICA INVASIVE MATERIAL+REPLACE I 1 ! + + PROPOSED WITH NO MOW FESCUE+NATIVE _ PROPOSED I I Li OSE NC 5'-0"O.C. VACCINIUM TREES/SHRUBS AS SPECIFIED- . . . . . . 19'-0" 17' X 44'POOL ' I I WALKWAY BE 5TJ" 53'•3" I GUSTIFOLIUM 0 3'-0"O.C.- _ _ - > + ,EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SEEDETAIL3+4 20'-5" RESIDENCE j PROPOSED 278 S.F. I L XLSIING TREES TO REMAIN FOR POOL PROFILE �_ j I + 4 62'-7' / \ WOOD STEPS j r . . . . . . . . . . . 62-T MASONRY (SEE DETAIL 5 I fFf.6J'-0" 1 WALL SECTION) ' I 58'-7" I + STEPS,LANDINGS+ � EP ( j FOR SECTION) I ITOC:62'•6' _ 1 I I 58'•T' RETAINING WALLS / -174' / .178'TO WATER, . . . . _ TW 62'•7' ( 125' PROPOSED + I . . . S.F. PROPOSED 3-0 303 S COVER BOX _ 62,•6„ 62'•5" 4'-8" I COVERED i I ON-GRADE .. . . 3AMELANCHIER 0 62'-5' MASONRY I ! I + CANADENSIS- I PROPOSED 121 S.F. PATIO 538 ST 1 EXISTING i I I I I I / + � • . . . . . . 8'.10'HT. ON-GRADE PROPOSED I ___, SANITARY SYSTEM . . . LAWN 13'-0" GRAVEL PAD WITH 11'-0" 8'X 8' 19'-2" 40'-7" I AS APPROVED BY NON- 5 JUNIPERUS FLUSH MASONRY _ SPA * I S.C.D.H.S. I I ,• DISTURBANCE VIRGINIANA- BORDER 10'•0" TOC:62'-S' 62'-T' ( I 1 I I BUFFER + + . . . . . 8'-10'HT. 31'-0" ��. 'i' \ I 3 1 * {y 8 ILEX 3 MORELLA SD•2 1 62'-S' 10'-0" 62'-S" I —J �tv' I I + + .VERTICILLATA- . . PENSYLVANICA,- SD•9 II I I i' I I i I II 1 3'-4'HT.. . . . i4'-5'HT. // PROPOSED NDS MICRO . . . . , • f � 62'•4' CHANNEL / i EL LP + + PROPOS + 18 0 'STRIP DRAINPROPOSED2725F GRAVEL 4 I ED FLUSH i PROP.45 S.FPROPOSED 'W. I + - OUTDOOR + + WOOD POOL GATEw' x + MASONRY BORDER 4,-0�� * WALKWAY WITH STEEL EDGING; I + + + PROPOSED 8'DIA.X 8'HT. SHOWER S4'-6" 54'•1"TS 62'-6' BS 5T•d"•DRYWELLS(SEE DETAIL 1) p ! + - --- + + + ♦ 62,•6" PROPOSED WOODBOTTOM OF BLUFF-� p : ,', + + + + 62'- " 65'-0" +BW 5T•6" PLANTING POOLFENCE TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT AIL HIGH WATER MARK ON i �„� .��• x—— - 235.56' Z JANUARY 16,2007. 1 '; / N 37°19'28"W -- _ , 100'SETBACK FROM--+! �. ������� `�i EXISTING FENCE / TOP OF BLUFF / PROPOSED 38 6.F. PROPOSED MASONRY PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE- RELOCATED �,� TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED 4'H. �� MASONRY STEPS RETAINING WALL 67 80' •I �\`� MESH POOL FENCE , PROPANE TANK \ N a2°29'S4"E COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE WOOD POOL FENCE i AS SHOWN ON COASTAL EROSION AREA 15 MORELLA PROPOSED SILT FENCE (SEE DETAIL 2) MAP PHOTO No.51-009-83 SHEET 15 OF 49 PENSYLVANICA•7 GAL. TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF 80 VACCINIUM LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL / MAP PROPOSED COVERAGE CALCULATIONS Drainage Calculations and Structure Schedule Lot Area 22,427 SF Drainage Buildable Lot Area(to CEHA Line 15,602 SF Structure Size Elevation Invert In Invert Out Allowed Buildable Coverage(20% 3,180 SF Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 1009/0),Proposed Gravel Driveway(758 sf @ 40%), Proposed Dwellingwith Overhangs 2,980 SF Proposed Gravel Walkway(555 sf @ 40.1/0),Proposed Outdoor Shower(45 sf @ 40%)+ Proposed Mason Landings 72 SF Proposed On-Grade Mason (108 sf @ 100%) PRECAST TRAFFIC 3,924 SF 2260 SF x 2"rainfall(.167)=377.5 CF/8'Dia.D wel l(42.3)=8.9'depth req'd BEARING CONCRETE Proposed Pool+Spa 812 SF SDR 35 PVC INLET PIPE SD-1 8'Dia x 10'depth SEE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE DOME OR SLAB TOP Proposed BBQ Area 605F 10'depth provided GRADE Total Proposed Coverage 3,924 SF Proposed 1/2 Dwelling(1609 sf @ 100%),Proposed On-Grade Masonry Patio(1195 sf @ 2'-0"MAX TOP OF DRYWELL 100%),Proposed BBQ Area(60 sf @ 1009'o)+Proposed On-Grade Gravel Pad(121 sf @ 40%) SDR 35 PVC P[:] C= 1=1 SEE PLAN FOR OVERFLOW PIPE SEE ELEVATION) 2912 SF x 2"rainfall(.167)=486.. CF/8'Dia.Drywel 142.3)=11.5'depth req'd PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE BACKFILL T-0"MINIMUM SD-2 8'Dia x 8'de th SD-3 8'Dia x 8'depth AROUND DRYWELL WITH16'de h provided 1 "-1 "MEDIUM COARSE LEGENDSwimmingPool Backwash ell SAND/GRAVEL COVERBOX WATER F.G. LINE E.G. O �;. PD-1 8'Dia x 4'de th 0 ❑ O PRECAST CONCRETE - ------ ---- - ----- I� _ STORM DRAIN RING ° O PROPERTY LINE 2'-0"MIN SHALLOW END h „ I a GROUND WATER LINE HEIGHT AND DIAMETER t� m SITE DATA: NOTES: AS INDICATED ON PLAN SEE TYPICAL DEEP END Ic NON-RATEABLE SOIL n ' SCTM#:1000.30-02-77 NOTES: GUNITE POOL T TOP OFBBLUFFFROM ( ) 1. Base ma information based on 6'-0"MIN WALL SECTION Lot Area:22,427 SF or 0.515 acres by Nathan Taft Corwin dated eY Zoning:R-40 prepared Y CLEAN MEDIUM___---- SAND AND GRAVEL- DETAIL+STEEL 13'-0" 13'-0" 18'-0" January 16,2007. COARSE FILL DRYWELLAT BE INSTALLED COASTAL EROSION RATEABLE SOIL SCHEDULE 44'-0" � � SURVEYOR: 2. This drawing is for the purpose of AS PER STATE AND LOCAL CODES JQ HAZARD LINE Nathan Taft Corwin obtaining permits on NOT FOR CLEAN MEDIUM 0\, 9 p N• COARSE BACKFILL SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH O� C-1) 1586 Main Road CONSTRUCTION. PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL POOL PROFILE TOP OF BLUFF Jamesport,NY 11947 3. Unauthorized alteration of this plan Is a SecBon Not to scale 3 secflon Scale:l"=ta'-0^ Office:(631)727-2090 violation of NYS Education Law, �\S�\� TEST HOLE DATA BOTTOM OF BLUFF PROPOSED WOOD LANDINGS (TEST HOLE DUG BYMcOONALD GEOSCIENCE ON JANUARY 4,2007) EL.52.T TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF #4 STEEL REINFOFCED ;� OL DARK BROWN D LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED MAP 18'-U'MAX. C.to C. LOAM ,, SITE PL °' DEPTH <S'-0" >5'-0" FLOOD ZONE LINE < 6"X 6"TILE FACING z O HORIZ. 10"o.c. 10'o.c. WATER LINE �_ TIE LINE ALONG APPARENT • y�y „ r v „ 44? VERT. 11To.c. 5"o.c. 4a;• 3" to HIGH WATER MARK STEFANIDES RESIDENCE O MIN. FLOOR 10"o.c.EACH WAY '� East Mar1070 ion,Newhe York F�� O BROWN SILTY PROPOSED SILT FENCE PERSPECTIVE VIEW '•,; ,' U I W SM+ML SAND AND (3)#4 BARS CONT. � bo T SANDY SILT PROPOSED 10'W. GEOTEXTILE TIED TO BOND BEAM ALL w n marshall paetzel WIRE FENCE WIRE FENCING AROUND TIES 10"O.C. > � PROPOSED NON-DISTURBANCE BUFFER 2'k4"OPENINGS < BLUFF STEPS landscape architecture, pc COMPACTED SOIL ISJ EXISTING CONTOUR _ PO Box 478 #4 BARS :' 48"FENCE POST 8'O.C. PNEUMATICALLY MARBLE DUST FINISH ph 631-2 NY 11952 EXISTING GEOTEXTILE mQ�$hQII Qetzei ph 631-209-2410 GRADE APPLIED CONCRETE RADIUS VARIES 6"TO 24" P mail@mpfastudio.com TO BE BURIED 'a IN GROUND, THICKNESS OF WALL ON SHALLOW END *�'6" PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AS SHOWN ��25"AND UP ON DEEP END 44' S e a 1 SLOPE �� BROWN FINE TO (? SW SPD-t� PROPOSED POOL DRYWELL COARSE SAND � NOTE: EL.6.T 46' MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA / _ ' elL 1/2 ACRE / 100 LINEAR FEET SW BRWATER IN OWN FINE EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM �D�FNDSCgp�. NOT TO 6CAI. DRAWN BY TO COARSE tt,Q, AFtSHq� C� S.PAEREL,RLA �+ Z SILT FENCE 4 TYPICAL GUNITE POOL WALL SECTION 5 BLUFF STEPS+LANDING SECTION SAND SSD-1� PROPOSED STORM DRAIN by �yM �,p DATE:2one2.21 S P-1 ' REVISED:2018A1.10 Section Nat to Scak section Not to Scala Section scale:r'=Ia'�'• 52' 0 �P `I' - S SHEET 1 OF 1 Z m t ��qTF 0o 18 5�' OF N0 i !RECEIVED -' --.._' ? __ __._- - _- -- - ------- -- ' ---' ------ ' $_-------_------ - �----'`------'_'-' ---- --------`---- - tA —*'Av AN 20w�8 � JAN ql � 0 I TEST HOLE DATA �L � 11� f (TEST HOLE DUG 8Y McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON JANUARY 4, 2007) J\ASK1 1, �y p�gpp�� /� APPEALS 6001 INC BOARD OF APPEAL � � EL. 52.7' 0. ����• �T(• I DARK BROWN LOAM OL architecture,P.C. ++ ` P.O.BOX 1254 JAMFSPOAT,NY 71947 PHONE(631)779-2832 PAX(631)779-2833 a Proposed Residence For: BROWN SILTY SAND AND SANDY SILT SM & ML 5 6 pR A9 ° `_jo ,/ �0'� �/ /i'/ //moi, 'i ary�'P \\N pN of �'p 'QAC �i/i /j /i'/i//// / ii5o .9. 0\4 SIN SN a Mr. gS e 37' r�pSN��r10 S /609/ BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW NoStefanides / / / // / // /, // Q EL 6.7' 3?' 16'/ '/j'/ //%'/////'//'//// / / - 46' 6 �9, ryo �/ / / / / / / The Strand Lot 125 tS �, ,/j ,/// /, , / / / WATER IN BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND SW Pebble Beach Farm SURVEY OF 0, '511* /' (/ "582 —_60 52• East Marion, IVY 11939 LOT 125 �6 // / / - - a°a/ice /�,'/ gViFF \��— — --� PROP05ED W DIA. X 41 DEEP S.C.T.M.#1000-30-2-77 MAP OF $ ' j ' ———— 2�" STORM DRAINS + PEBBLE BEACH FARMS ti atp 10 '° 1 --- — ' �0� INFORMATION EB NA� SEAL FILE No. 6266 FILED JUNE 11, 1975 v'� 1 / x 'o / I ,'O° 90 O CORWIN TAFT III DATED j.9, G• i� ��o �� / 9y��6, 1-I6-2007 SITUATED AT � Fro �\ a� // / �lb �> � Ct- EAST MARION60.2L\-- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK PROPOSED CLEARING LIM1 62.9 ' ROP05ED 4,092 S.F. 0 i �" N1-,}�` ' DURING CONSTRUCTION. o ' // �s OF h —X56 TWO-STORY RESIDENCE (63.01 � S.C. TAX No. 1000-30-02-77 LOCATION OF SILT FENCE AND I F / �,� S ��e F.F.E.)WITN 490 S.F. p\` SCALE 1"=40' HAY BALES :\ 1 s ATTACHED GARAGE AT _ JANUARY 16, 2007 o� / �, '�� �/' b BASEMENT LEVEL (53.0 F.F.E.) \3i�'?o, �ZD 9 X01 MARCH 7, 2007 ADDED CLEARING LIMIT o / _ DECEMBER 10, 2015 ADD BUILDING ENVELOPEPROPOSED W DIA. X 41 DEEP oat 6010 / 4 STORM DRAINS AREA = 22,427 sq. ft. G�� 0.515 ac. G �o rod / / 53.0 Sa PROPOSED N 'P a 1 / GRAVEL DRIVEWAY A Q ght 2016.STAOpAM srcLSteetive,p.c..AB (� F! 000 / a'reserved.me Architect reacrvea the A&to reproduce dda acdgn in Sts entirety or any portkm O C f c^ I F, �. thersof:Uxuuthorl-d alteration of these d-=Mta b a ttL /L \ violation of the New York State Education Law.'hese NOM '9J• N Y + drawings and sped6cations arc an in tnmaent of aervloe tt` o OC\• Q� and are the property of the Arcbitect.Thrae drawings 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM 'P o f V\> ! + and spedBcation+are not to be used m my other EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 10.0 \� '�` J\I / 53.2 FG°C\0'' ,�10•fj1 project,e oeptbywrittenpermisslonofthe Arddtect. EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS:——— 10 •� 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM FE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103CO63 G A5 APPROVED BY S.GDHSPROJECTNO. 16-AR007 ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); . . . . 'n s _ BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINEDSCALE 1"=40'° DATE 9/23/16 ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. a P 6') e \�G P,�lv� \F, < V\`G� DRAWN NY TLD/RS CHECKED BY RS I SE 5 o � titi 1 ISS�S QJ TITLE f oyEl c°S 6� a % 9 STORMWATER RETENTION CALCULATION: o� 5\pt� a s SITE t\ 3�° Z BASED ON 2' RAINFALL CONTAINMENT o�°'I p P�R\� t IMPERVIOUS OjS 3,495 JA � PLAN 3,495 SFXFEET 580 CUBIC FEET CONTAINMENT REQUIRED; 1 580 G.F./ 42 C.F.(PER LINEAR FEET OF 81 DIA. RING) _-14 FEET SHEET OF COMBDEPTH DEPT CONTAINMENT PROVIDED: (4) B' DIA X 4 FEET DEEP STORM RINGS oQ�e� I OFFICE LOCATION: ®��®? S® MAILING ADDRESS: t� Town Hall Annex ® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 II � pp(cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) CAP Southold, NY 11971 ® a� Telephone: 631 765-1938 �/s ',�SII� Fax: 631 765-3136 `4 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEWD APR 2 5 2018 MEMORANDUM —70NIlYG BOARD OFApPEApS To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, AICP, Assistant Town Planning Director LWRP Coordinator Date April 24, 2018 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref LEFKARA HOLDINGS LLC #7158 SCTM# 1000-30-2-77. Please note that the lot is subject to a filed Covenant and Restrictions dated May 14, 1975 and filed June 11, 1975 on Liber 7855 Page "unreadable" by the Pebble Beach Realty Inc: and subsequent amendments. A copy of the document is attached. LEFKARA HOLDINGS LLC #7158 - Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280-116A, Article XXIII, Section 280-124, and the Building Inspector's January 16, 2018, Amended February 5, 2018 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and to construct new accessory structures; 1) less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; 2) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 1070 The Strand, (Adj. to the Long Island Sound) East Marion, NY. SCTM#1000-30-2-77. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the actions are INCONSISTENT with the below Policy Standards and therefore are INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested. A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. Relocate/redesign the pool to meet the 100' setback to the greatest extent practicable. Long Island Sound bluff systems experience unpredictable, rapid and often severe erosion during major storm events. This type of erosion over time may cause the loss of structures due to slope failure. Distance of the structure to the top of bluff, soil properties, and integrity of the slope as well as toe of slope stability dictates the threat that erosion hazards pose to structures. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. Chapter 275 Wetlands and Shorelines § 275.3 Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks requires a 100' minimum setback for pools and related structures from the top of bluff. Clarify how the French drain to the pool drywell will be connected. The more than code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20% (proposed 26%) is not discordant with surrounding community character and is recommended as CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Attach. Cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney Suffoll•Counth•SWCD :� V /� ti Corey Humphrey, 423 G6ing Avenue �OL l..0f J District Manager Suite 110 f / (631)852-3286 Riverhead,NY 11901 rw ; www.SuffolkSWCD.org J IL Rob Carpenter Chairman 4t( February 22,2018'. _ CL 14%6*Leslie K.Weisman � �v D�" b)V Chairperson 1 Board of Appeals Town of Southold d� P. 0. Box 1179 OARQ9F E11?PE Za?IVING� •. Southold, New York 11971-0959 Re: ZBA#7158 Lefkara Holdings, LLC 1000-30-2-77 Dear Chairperson Weisman, Observations: In response to your request a site visit was conducted on February 6 with a follow up visit on February 22, 2018 to review and evaluate a proposal to develop a parcel located at 1070 The Strand in East Marion. The property is located on an eroding bluff along the Long Island Sound in a residential area. There is currently no private access to the bluff or beach. Construction of the residence has commenced. The proposed construction includes a single family dwelling, with additions including a 420 sqft patio, 17' X 44' in ground pool, 8' X 8' spa, 13' X 13' gravel pad with masonry border and a beach access stairwell. During the evaluation I made several observations with respect to slope, vegetation, potential/existing erosional features, and proposed structure locations. The following is a summary of our observations and comments. The site has significant slope descending in a northerly direction towards the bluff. This grading scheme would tend to channel runoff towards the bluff during the construction process upon clearing the site. Additionally, there is significant evidence of existing erosion due to runoff and a hose discharging water from the easterly neighboring property. The undeveloped site serves as habitat for various local wildlife. Habitat destruction is a concern; however, to my knowledge no endangered species are presently occupying this area. Additionally, the still undeveloped portion of the site is overgrown with both native and non- native invasive species. The bluff is significantly degraded at the top, face, and toe. The face of the bluff has sloughed, removing vegetation and therefore increasing instability of the bluff. The toe of the bluff is significantly scoured and eroded due to tidal forces and storm damage. There is currently no toe stabilization. The top of the bluff is overhanging and showing significant signs of erosion Office Hours: Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Friday 7 30 a.m through 3:00 p.m. and instability. The little vegetation that is still rooted on the bluff is not likely to persist future sloughing or erosive forces. 7 - E.c Additionally, while walking the shoreline on February 22, we observed severe degradation of this bluff extending more than 100 yards in either direction from this parcel. Each beach access stairway beginning at The Long Way heading west beyond this parcel, has been destroyed by current storm activity and severe damage to the toe and sloughed face are evident. tea [p e , V ML 1 ._. .....r a.. ., @� I i Consequently, vertical faces have been created and additional erosion and sloughing can be expected. dOn Recommendations: Due to the severe degradation of the bluff top,face, and toe, it is not recommended any construction be done until adequate stabilization can be achieved. An inventory and evaluation of the bluff and shoreline on a larger scale should be conducted and measures should be taken towards stabilization and remediation. Please seethe attached document Stabilization of Eroding Bluffs. Installing an access stairwell would cause additional and unnecessary disturbance to an already compromised bluff face. Additionally,the 10'wide non-disturbance buffer partially falls within the' costal erosion hazard line and thus provides little protective influence;furthermore,this limited area is not significant due to the current state of erosion and overhanging vegetation at the top of the bluff. I estimate at least 3'of this buffer to be severely unstable. The proposed fence along this area is not advised. Driving fence posts into this already compromised area will only increase the chance for further losses. At this time and phase of construction, it is not recommended any land clearing be done within 75' setback from the bluff edge. Clearing the land would only lead to increased runoff and concentrated flow causing further damage. Should the land clearing and planting commence as planned, invasive species should be removed and only native plants and grasses should be planted. Once established, native plantings do not require constant irrigation. Irrigation will only contribute to bluff instability. In ground sprinkler systems are never recommended. I recommend the maintenance of a natural yard space. Upon completion of construction,grassed area on the North side of the home should be limited, maintaining natural growth of native plants will further increase the integrity of the bluff while reserving an area to serve as a natural habitat for local wildlife. Within the active construction area, referencing the area to the south of the proposed masonry border, the proposed pool is situated above grade with consideration of the top of the bluff. The requested setback conforms to the neighbors although it encroaches on the allowable 100'. What will be done with the excavated sand and soil from the pool area? It is unclear why the pool backwash drywell location was chosen and how the pool water will reach it. The drywell is located on the southeast edge of the property on the proposed drawing appearing to be nearly 100'away from the pool. Is this correct? If so, how will the pool overflow and drainage be conveyed to this drywell? Is there a difference between the drywell structure and capacity for the pool backwash and the storm drains? It is necessary to consider what will be done with the pool water in the event the pool must be drained. Under no circumstances should water be discharged over the top of the bluff. Additionally,there are two (2) storm drains placed within 15'of the west side of the pool and it is unclear what these drywells will be collecting. It is unclear on the drawing whether or not the retaining wall extends across the entire length of the yard or if there is an opening in the wall where the pool cover box is located. An opening in the wall would provide an area that water could flow in the event of catastrophic failure of the pool, improper pool draining, or severe storm event. The newly constructed dwelling with planned patios contains impervious surfaces and will generate runoff from the rooftop, patio cover structure,and the patio collectively. It is our further recommendation installation of gutters, leaders, and down spouts piped to drywells on the north side of the construction. This will compensate for the increase in runoff caused by the additional impermeable area. Such installation will help reduce the threat of erosion on the bluff and the possibility of flooding around the residence and the neighbors. The drawing does not demonstrate provisions to capture this additional water on the north side of the residence. The south side of the residence has adequate drainage. Extreme care must be taken during construction and land clearing to protect the bluff. Construction equipment must keep as far away from the bluff as possible. Debris of any type must never be disposed of on the bluff face. Runoff should not be allowed to flow over the bluff edge and down the bluff face. It is advised to install temporary structures such as straw bales and silt fences to reduce runoff velocity and trap sediment. These practices should be installed north and west of the construction area. Thank you for contacting the Soil and Water Conservation District for comments. If you have any questions regarding our site visit and information provided, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, A Marie Calabro Soil District Technician OA -b 1k? ` . �t� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ' RECEIVE® j- t 0,&,v",4-A- FEB 2 0201$ ZONING 1-fQ a hc,��N �D� �� BOARD OFAPPEALS l6, c N(9 Steven Bellone1. �lq� (4S SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE11 Department of Economic Development and Planning Theresa Ward Division of Planning Deputy County Executive and Commissioner and Environment February 13, 2018 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to'the Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number Patinella, Wer&Marisa #7157 Lefkara Holding #7158 McIntosh, William &Lorraine #7159 Moshouris,Nick #7160 Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning < Theodore R. Klein Principal Planner TRK/cd H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 ■ (631)853-5191 Fuentes, Kim From: Calabro, Ann Marie <AnnMarie.Calabro@suffolkcountyny.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:13 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: ZBA 7158 Lefkara Attachments: 7158 Lefkara Holdings.pdf, Stabilization of Eroding Bluffs.pdf Importance: High Hi Kim, Here is the report I promised earlier. I have attached the document for Stabilization as well because this bluff is in severe need of stabilization and remediation. The last storm took a toll on it. Our district has an informational video titled Coastal Bluff Erosion. It can be found on our Useful Information tab on our website. Please feel free to suggest anyone watch the video you feel would benefit, it contains a great amount of information. Have a great day. A vwnv McwCel Cala )vo- SoaDi4&CctT Su ffo&Cowvity SoaEr Water Coyoervatw-wD(4&(ct 423 (�r49!nlq Aver ► vewhea&,, NY 11901 A !U.�av 631-852-3288 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended solely for the use of the individual/entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. 1 N RCS United States Department of Agriculture Suffolk County Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil & Water Conservation District STABILIZATION OF ERODING BLUFFS L The coastal shoreline is affected by many different forces and is exposed to many harsh conditions. A result of these forces and conditions is erosion. Bluff erosion is a natural process that can be slowed but not stopped. The only prediction that can be made is that bluff erosion will occur; the timing and degree of the erosion cannot. Areas along the coastline may experience accelerated rates of erosion due to factors such as winter storms and extreme high tides. In these instances,houses and structures built on the top of the bluffs are at risk from erosion. H. The erosion of high sandy bluffs along coastlines has challenged conservationists since they were first observed. Typical of such bluffs are those along the north shore of Long Island. The soil material is sandy and erosive, easily moved by wind or water. Bluff height varies from a few feet, to well over 100 feet. The slope is usually about 1:1, or at whatever angle the material is stable. The profiles of eroding and stabile bluffs are represented below. Typical characteristics of erodiniz bluffs sloping the wrong direction oyer hanging lip remnants of old vegetation, boulder, etc ,{ deyegetated slope ' eroding tae normal high tide May 2007 1 Typical procedures that have had a desirable effect on slowing bluff erosion Al water diverted away from slope over 9 han in liP removed NY 9 well vegetated slope well vegetated toe F normal high tide "4 III. Numerous attempts have been made by landowners to stabilize bluff slopes; only a few have succeeded. Although no procedure can guarantee a permanent solution or stop this erosion, the following measures have been found to be the most effective in obtaining the best possible stabilization of the bluff face. Stabilization of the toe and top of the bluff (ideally simultaneously) must occur. Implementing practices (such as revegetation, terracing, geo-textiles) without achieving this stability will not be successful. Resulting in a loss of time, resources, and financial investment as these areas are compromised by erosion. Once both of these areas are stabilized, efforts should be focused on remediating the bluff face. Although stabilization of the toe and top is recommended first, the environment should be evaluated holistically. Thereby, remediation of the bluff face should occur in conjunction with and/or as soon as possible after the remediation of the top and toe. Top Stabilization: a. Remove the overhanging lip at the top of the slope creating a natural angle of repose. This is generally a 1:1 slope or 45 degree angle. b. Any trees along the top edge of the bluff should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. Tall trees swaying in the wind will loosen the bluff soils. c. Do not allow surface water (i.e. pool water, runoff, irrigation water) to flow I over the top of the slope. Installation of a diversion with a catch basin drain and a vegetated natural buffer both serve this purpose. d. No ground disturbing activities should occur within 10 feet of the edge of the bluff. This includes installation of landscaping plants, irrigation systems, decks, and fences. e. Pools should be installed with an in ground drain to facilitate drainage (unless clay lenses exist within the bluff profile). May 2007 2 r f. Houses should be fitted with gutters and down spouts which discharge into dry wells in order to reduce runoff flowing over the bluff edge. g. Sprinklers should not discharge water onto or near the bluff face. h. Irrigation scheduling should not exceed the peak consumptive requirements of the turf grasses (approximately 1"per week). Toe Stabilization: a. The use of vegetation is the preferred method to maintain a stabile toe. However, vegetation alone is not always successful. A good indicator of whether or not vegetation will stabilize the toe is the location of the mean high tide (MHT) mark. If MHT reaches the toe of the bluff, it is unlikely that vegetation alone will stabilize this site. If this is the situation, a consultation with NRCS or the SC SWCD can provide you with other alternatives. b. If a hardening structure, such as a bulkhead or rock revetment exists, it is critical that proper maintenance occurs to these structures. Such regular maintenance prolongs the life. The additional benefits are the protection the toe of the bluff and reduction in repair/replacement costs. The following are the maintenance activities that should occur on the bulkhead. ➢ Decaying and or damaged boards should be replaced. ➢ Holes behind the bulkhead should be filled with sand. ➢ Geotextile must be maintained between the bulkhead or revetment in order to retain sand behind the structure. The lack of geotextile in combination with wave action will pull sediment through the structure eventually cause collapse and failure. ➢ Vegetation (beach grass, Spartina patens, Coastal Panic grass) should be maintained on top of the bulkhead. Bluff Face: a. Any trees along the top edge and on the bluff face should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. b. Trash, grass clippings, leaves and branches should not be disposed of on the bluff face. This creates instability as the debris adds weight to the bluff face and dually smothers vegetation. Thus, such debris should be removed from the bluff face and disposed of properly. c. A natural angle of repose should occur on the bluff face. Depending on the height and location of the vertical faces, such an angle may not be practical. Grading is a satisfactory practice to create such a natural slope at locations where such an angle can be achieved. Care should be taken to not disturb stabile areas of the bluff in an attempt to stabilize the eroding locations. Such precautions will prevent additional erosion problems on the bluff. d. ReNegetate the slope. ➢ `Cape' American beach grass and Spartina patens plugs should be used for this purpose and transplanted while dormant in the late winter or May 2007 3 early spring. Planting should occur from the top of the bluff face down. �,, Both Spartina and Beachgrass should be planted 12" apart. Rows should 0 be separated by 12" and the plants should be staggered with plants in adjacent rows. ➢ Each full row should consist of entirely Beachgrass or Spartina and the rows should alternate between these the two species. For Beachgrass, one 35mm film canister of Osmocote slow release fertilizer should be placed into each planting hole and then plant three stems or culms per hole. ➢ To add diversity to the bluff planting, reduce the threat of disease, and compensate for natural beach grass die out, it is recommended to broadcast the following warm season grass mixture immediately prior to planting the `Cape' American beach grass. The warm season grass mixture should consist of- 'Blackwell' £`Blackwell' Switch grass (Panrcum virgatum)* 4 PLS lb/Ac `Atlantic' Coastal panic grass (Panrcum amarum)* 5 PLS lb/Ac `Niagara' Big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii)* 5 PLS lb/Ac Coastal Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium v. littoriale)* 3 PLS lb/Ac Sheep fescue (Festuca ovina) for quick, temporary cover 10 lb/Ac `Monarch' Seaside Goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens v. Monarch) 1 lb/Ac `Golden Jubilee' Black-eyed Susan(xudbeckia hirta) 1 lb/Ac Partridge Pea(Chamaecrista fasciculata) 1 lb/Ac Common Evening Primrose oenothera biennis) 1 lb/Ac (*Rates are in Pure Live Seed Pounds Per Acre.) Spreading this seed mix just prior to planting the Beachgrass and Spartina, allows for the incorporation of the seed by foot traffic and sand disturbance as the beach grass is planted. This action is critical to a good seed establishment. Adapted shrubs and vines can be added when the slope is well stabilized with the above listed grasses. Species include Bayberry, Beach pea, Shore rose, and Beach plum. ➢ Apply 20 lb/ac of nitrogen in June if beach grass vigor is declining. ➢ Maintenance of the vegetated slope will be required on a continuous basis. Remove debris from planted areas; keep all water diverted from the slope; do not over-irrigate the lawn above; avoid excessive foot traffic and repair any damaged or eroding areas. May 2007 4 V FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVE® BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. FEB 01 2010 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE: January 16, 2018 AMENDED: February_ 5, 2018 TO: Michael Kimack(Lefkara Holdings LLC) PO Box 1047 Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated January 3, 2018 For a permit to make additions alterations to an existing single family dwelling and new accessory structures at Location of property 1070 The Strand, East Marion,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 30 Block 2 Lot 77 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 A. (1),which states: "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff. The construction notes a setback of 74 feet from the top of bluff, at its closest point. Furthermore the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-124, which states that a maximum lot coverage of 20% is allowed. Following the construction, there will be a total lot coverage of 25.1%construction, there will be a total lot coverage of 25.1% S::uthorilzed/isa val was amended ollowin a correction in the lot covets a calculation. (; nature Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. FORM NO. 3 a 4P 3 RFCEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT JAN SOUTHOLD, N.Y. BONING BOARD of APPEALS NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 16, 2018 TO: Michael Kimack(Lefkara Holdings LLC) PO Box 1047 Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated January 3, 2018 For a permit to make additions, alterations to an existing single family dwelling and new accessorX structures at Location of property 1070 The Strand, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 30 Block 2 Lot 77 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 A. (1), which states: "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff. The construction notes a setback of 74 feet from the top of bluff, at its closest point. Furthermore, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-124, which states that a maximum lot coverage of 20% is allowed. Follo 0 osed construction there will be a total lot coverage of 26% Authorized Signature Note to Applicant:Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. �CED , 15 APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAU9 A:2 2018 AREA VARIANCE ZOWIING BOAR®OF APPEALS House No./O'Q Street 1p;�/,j�/ 9/¢�/DN4- SCTM 1000 Section_,10 Block .2 Lot(s)/ILot Size 2 ,42 Zonee___14,0 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED / BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED /Z 2> 2 GI 7 REV. /Ad> 2 B/B Owner(s): & O &_3_ L L G Mailing Address: t7 O B�DM apt/ ,�. 699A j�/ e/;tv. Telephone:?/?- , 8-,578 Fax: Email:N.&ojy-EF.t7NIb.ES� GM•t1,(�.. eDI> NOTE:In addition to the above please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: elAIAC/D for 00 Owner( )Other: Address: 9 Pe 1,147, -rc, QQ Al-Y &!?7Z Telephone:VA 67 M* Fax: Email: A,V�L�>zQ/I/. �'✓�` Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), Vj Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE LAN DATED 4Z&ZQ® and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED FOR: ()Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( ) Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not qu to the code.) Article:XX111XW,11 Section: P'O Subsection: / /24 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: O� A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal ( ) has, ()(has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# RECEIVED REASONS FOR APPEAL '.ease be specific, additional sheets may be usru zth preparer's JAN 19 2018 signature notarized): ZONING BOAR®OF APPEALS 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: B&C/VUTL:F �t-/as °Ui GG N Q 9"' C//vSLc.¢N v�vD�S''1.�•�IE,�Cq/dy��G�E�/�i/��� C�����-c� the benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some �thati �i s'�`bi 1E fohe�PPli'ca�t'�O�p�ursue, other O�a���2ry �,e ,� /lyiO.�oy�r/�vTs �J,9J'1.P,9®8Y 145 o wkF�P ,4N/hi1X US/6N INTD J'�,� "- 7'6'4 C& ®S "1", '0V Z_ �f C4Av_ 1I 4 vo,v ro ,4�9V/,EV,� � �LN�F�T-J`oUGf/ 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: 'V'4¢uoxx-go iVT AA1 �GU��1�T?3.4�� GUO U�,� ��.Z 6°fo. �1��►'yauG�/ o y-`�v / /1/ /A/ W& ry of T//� 'E0A ININ& AIS-I A/0_5 1 ,E � � 7V /'�•� /QW&VN(9 Fo,2 /&P,q0 VE/ k5A/TS• CdLL� vjv pox covd5RA � f.�c�•Y�s' �s ��� / OU-0 Urjey .09'o OF l�YL�l�,t'rJ/�'7',� CQ y�1G,6, �L/N0V&;V NOWMAS r6nqFioMtb4 N•4,8� G l>✓-)V �t� v�T!1'fob�- zs'9a vg/e/An!� /r'/S 4�Z'he arian ewillNOThaveanadverseeffector impact on t ie physical rll �0/l/S neighborhood or district because: R,4Ny ®,' 711,0 P4V,6L-WA16S-IN 7- ,F- N�/G "F or J/!ty/Ls�,�' /J, S/6/V ,AID A/i 1/,� Pods ,9iVD "P,4vig L 0 C � �s ppQPos.�D Y n , T71�,eO 4 Y! NO ,�� OR 5.Has the allegedOle fficul`gbeen selfcreated? X} Yes,or { } No Why: ,�/V )WRO/ZIVQd Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? K No { } Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this Lq' day of A r 20JQ_. v rN Notary Public CONNIE D.BUNCH Notary Public,State of New York No.01 BU6185060 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14,2'o RECEIVE® .71�'g APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION JAN n 9 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICANT: &/Ch&A,.61— A .4/Z91 CG& DATE PREPARED: 1&7,12 G/8 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: /141-A II.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: MIA Dimensions of new second floor: A114 Dimensions of floor above second level: Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): /1! Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: A4 III.Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: 7 5444 POO L (&I de�9 d>"Z�A- Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: �//9 IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Q Proposed increase of building coverage: -T V24 Square footage of your lot: .94, 42? G D J` , Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: ,7 70 V. Purpose of New Construction: T® ,#1j/Q /A/ (2,p I1/1NO )00 OL TO AIScv 19W1&: 1&& )Coe ME &> r,5 Aho ARA-WIPs VI.Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): C� 7C. JOOO rht',5 AL rz- Y ®-do a Tff I1-o&E-- IT GUZLL 1f5G4- M LED Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION RECEIVED A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? JAN A 9 2018 Yes No ZONING BOARI3 OFAPpFALS B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No _ Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. l.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? y6$"' 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? A/0 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?aC /►/ Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:A".P 61 jVT.a Z6A and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? A10 E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? )&EY If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: 1',E� SylMli/G AMACMEP G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? Al D If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel &J2PA Ae. /`1/L and the proposed use &&DP"-V AL J'JA164g5 'eeOA2CA 7 pmt (ex: existing single family,proposed: same with garage,pool or other) Authorized signature and Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED -7>679 �o BUILDING DEPARTMENT ED , TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE JAN 1,-9 2018 SOUTHOLD, NY ZONIIYG BOARD OFAPPEALS BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 41122 Date: 10/27/2016 Permission is hereby granted to: Lefkara Holdings LLC 100 Brompton Rd Garden City, NY 11530 To: construct a new single family dwelling as applied for per SCHD approval. At premises located at: 1070 The Strand, East Marion SCTM # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 30.-2-77 Pursuant to application dated 9/30/2016 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 4/28/2018. Fees: SINGLE FAMILY DWE77R! ION $2,540.40 .00 .40 Building spector TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 'T-69 TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE RECEIVED SOUTHOLD, NY JAN 2010 BUILDING PERMIT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 42102 Date: 10/31/2017 Permission is hereby granted to: Lefkara Holdings LLC 100 Brompton Rd Garden City, NY 11530 To: install roof-mounted solar panels as applied for. At premises located at: 1070 The Strand, East Marion SCTM # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 30.-2-77 Pursuant to application dated 10/20/2017 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 5/2/2019. Fees: SOLAR PANELS $50.00 CO -ALTERATION TO DWELLING $50.00 ELECTRIC $100.00 Total: $200.00 2uilding Insector RICULTURAL DATA STATEMEN RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JAN TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOAR®OF APPEALS WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: 1.��K,��P�1 SOL // + C- 2. Address of Applicant: Zo() e1',VQ�iV CITY /SJ`^.3U 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Des ription of Prop sed Project: C'O/I/Sfi, UC"� P/ZD�DS'�O e�Db� 11 VX 4, 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax number) /,O 70 7V� -P-MAMO- ZUr" 1 0W.0 0A/, IV y ,�9✓a 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {)(No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes g No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 2oJP Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B RECEIVED Short Environmental Assessment Form JAIL 10 2018 Instructions for Completing ZONING BOAR®OFAPPEALS Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1 You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: �,L c Project Location(describe, and attach a location map): 0 0 d9 Brief Description of Proposed Action: caiv�UC7_ Pt oda s�o p©a� -rte.� o V, /",Po NRY X477 0, 9/9 eP ,� x' 7 1 ii/�l✓C� Al L.LS f✓/4 ClC�/LG,6A L.� 11�L TD /I/'4v&��'.4L Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 4. E-Mai : g /ZD . yz,- Address: O. ggOX 41 City/PO: State: Zip Code: SD 077yaw X/y 1971 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: A/Y.r,o6 C, 77US'7,=_,E5, X 01Wirv& APZ/ X 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.24 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑ Rural (non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial `Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 RECEIVED �� r 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? JAN R P 2018 X b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? X 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: X 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES y b.Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? X c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? X 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features a d technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: X 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: f��� X 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? X b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? 1 If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑ Urban IdSuburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, „ S a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? �NO ❑ YES )C b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and.storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ElNO YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include., istruction or other activities that result in thRkfUlZMgment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? 7� If Yes,explain purpose and size: JAN 8 ZONING BOARD E)FAPPEALS 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: 9 I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: V 1— W. Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large JAN A 9 2018 '7� impact impact may may ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result to an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts., ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zonine Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION JAIL (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) -70IJI G BOARD OF APPEALS Nf,OT=S residing at ZOO H&,0 1�7V1V eP (Print property owner's name)HENREW (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize (Agent) '/C ,�22LLA. ,��VL to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owne s S' nature) /1l.�D�,SOS s'T�.�,IN��'S �,��'?8� ► (Print Owner's Name) APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : jr4GC /1//� A64�C �TQS (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a `7 �y company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) / s TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply)I RECEIVED Tax grievance Building Permit JAN 2018 Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of ,20 Signature Print Name AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : elC%/e /t?I (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) d(� Tax grievance Building Permit X RMENED l� Variance Trustee Permit �( Change of Zone Coastal Erosion JAN 10 7-016 Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning ING BOARD OF APPEALS Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. "Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 12 day of.—� ,20 d Signature Vj Print Name refers; ' I ing:s LLC JA a=r;� 203Un-qtr 2 4.2018 LjbltjU • t�nkCal?;�,� €�rr, ECrraievc£,Ifry.I�CI.II ' Al�®F � ri:p'laly is: LS Lefkara, Holdings ,LLC ��r��Pk'�; ���j�l:��s�tt�tg@at tl�t��tntf•9az,h•Pasrt~� tll+x�+Cl:�+.� Pr d •!• 1P rCi�at ft Ilit Wore c:fjrll I1;j;r 4• Ls:fj,t•,n Nassau 71 IfRrY 4 pt:lerrtlstl�Tlt I-AO-st dau, a►t M1M1eI�1�> t 3c Mtp t Cd tL4bil9&y���rrr�a�1��r s* ac,�cra� GGC���r�d;li:oltil.tt}�caarctt�i'trtl' 7ap=sa1 ��tlarl V4• _ Ili?fit e,f; ,fzti Y6 Wlthtll or ,aCF;owl the}>.�c:4tc si,, u� tie �7i.all gal'I a� c.c>RY c�E any pregie:.rt agn.Inst, the ttt��stfm?�l 1ta1a,11].tM1� �caan Lira �w-cryo'd � n hirre ar hoer i_:- Letkara'Holdings LLC 100 Brompton 'Road Garden Cj`y� NY 11530 ' Gait sera?t ztorct irtlCas? IlItisa g"1-1-1 31111L7 rki`th(i rr°z�Wrr,rc6 i1,�F;lt ti tl�F IlTnIted �Ca:bi.l:tt�'c0txa�ajr ' upuri %V','Q rt aaaci F+E'. hIc�tl . 1.-..�<1�;al , thc liYJllt:3 liarattttt �'TnPa Y 4,-M b-c -"-M,Cd Ls. The,c,1'a-�(p, ,u daGp of titer t a i The-limi to d li.ablUty COmp ny is to,be enamigeA by fE~�5S C`}i j°�3Cc� ri:tt� ka �xh: Zonc for t1jore one Or More rEtzht3�l+cT� DA xis Or classes.of m mb rs Acl �1r ��� s s of 1 rli3tis{"t my ui`mESS WHEREOF, this {crificaw has ke,11 s1rLie May 10, .201 by che� tat dem"g-mcd s�-hv affil-mst�t:tt Chjc t t� r14, �c� h reiat ;t��• aa�; ta•t7���°r the Of lw,.tj to N ' -S j, Aedf11 � ter' Ma St f-: i -fir vier Town of Southold RECEYED LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM JAN A 9 20J8 A. INSTRUCTIONS BONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM#——�J V-_�-_ 7 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. 9 Board of Trustees E] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital 0 construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: 62AL17RUCE R2040- XW ey/y H—Nmoo� PA)l0 ,9BQ 4A6/4 ci4 4AID COAL r� �� TXI�111/6 w S Location of action: ZQ 70 njoE 07AJ1/,D r 144 AI Site acreage: RECEIVED -i/ Present land use: JAN -19 2018 Present zoning classification:_ 40 zOVING BOARD OF APPEALS 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) ��7 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 9 If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes No _Not Applicable 7W,—t- Rer)-70024a c'_" a /V06'Z- ,—X' LO - 0 IV v U PROPid�TAO -,oCD 3M Cr— aa6J7 /`9q/fes' 1707-pooyz 4CX1W -�,4!�s Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No [X2 Not Applicable o� Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes�, No Not Applicable s c o 6 /J' L UAL T d (�, BWe ORLL RF-CEIVED Attach additional sheets if necessary JAN NATURAL COAST POLICIES ZONING 130ARD OF APPEALS Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 11 No� Not Applicable 7V25 "60-r-- C7- oS LIYNDGfJMD QT Q6 ML EVOWQ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes [] No Not Applicable �,i5 -Z-71/,?5LP � M Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes D NoNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. RECEIVED —7) ❑ Yes ❑ No Z Not Applicable JAN 19 2018 A10 IAI C //V ZV�6 �:dt Ori V��l CL,e5—S41®1yYfqG B®aR®®FAaPgq,5;— / OAV ,!' ,1S C Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable T�,g � d l�Dl` p I�60 L LULL L A107- IAI 7M5C} 5 100,9 4V,9-ME 11,42AR= PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. E] Ye� No� Not Applicable �.0 L F " PZ)RZ/C .4 CC s 14 CIzDss Pel-)PIC-10T/ R&A62J C 4crmss` 9_4r iV /11/6.,V (ZIA�,e 94a V o4Ni:- P eo Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [:] No.� Not Applicable r RECEIVEED JAKI '1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No� Not Applicable " /./I'�PAC7- ON 41 VZA1 G AORI V,E: iC',E�i�G�S Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoX Not Applicable AAO CRI C1,1 LE&R,4Z- LAAL)3 ONL/,021"- AM2 AOWA5 U-)> ZWN 6-00 FEET- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoX Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM AN 41b c ►--., -1� ��. + 't.,•° moi; i`' ./ _ �T"he St;ana arth s p 2Wft 1 � P r r t • § b � I hexStrand ` j i IV IF arthp 5y\ a. _21 01i LL Lu 0 I Z m , PROPOSED SILT FENCE (SEE DETAIL 2) �►p U�, 17 VACCINIUM 4 JUNIPERUS B ILEX PROPOSED MASONRY ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. VIRGINIANA-8'-10 HT. VERTICILLATA-S-4!HT RETAINING WALL 7 MORELLA PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE 3 MORELLA �•— ((( PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL. MESH POOL FENCE PENSYLVANICA-4'-5'HT. BW T-4" ` S 39"24'45"E + �'-6. 56'-6- 62'-6 ' PROPOSED 14"W. PROPOSED POOL + + PROPOSED FLUSH FRENCH DRAIN EQUIPMENT AREA -� MASONRY BORDER (PIPED TO DRYWELL PROPOSED 60 S.F. + + m m s m m J m m m m m m m s m m BBQ AREA } 62 2V' NON + 13'-5" 37£ I 2(Td' 37-4' DISTURBANCE -E + - , PROPOSED 1195 S.F. I I RVFFER 21'-0" LAWN ON-GRADE I I MASONRY PATIO 62'-T PROPOSED 4'1prw �� PROPOSED 4'W. ♦ _ PROPOSED NDS MICRO i 60,-r WOOD POOL GA� � MOWED PATH 62'.6' CHANNEL STRIP DRAIN I PROPOSED 420 S.F. 1 , COVERED IT 1 ON-GRADE OVE PRIVET+INVASIVE MASONRY MATERIAL REPLACE WITH REMOVE EXISTING PRIVET+ I I PATIO 1ORELLA PEJSYLVAINVASIVE MATERIAL+REPLACE NICA ENC WITH NO MOW FESCUE+NATIVE5-0 . . +VACCINIUM GUSTIFOLIUM I TREES/SHRUBS AS SPECIFIED- 19'-0" PROPOSED 1 XISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 17' X"'POOL ' � RESIDENCE C . , TO62'-6' ' I 62'-T FFE 63'-0' I 1 t 74' 25 t 7G TO WATER PROPOSED PROPOSED 3-T ' 62'-6' -1" I I 303 S.F. COVER BOX COVERED ♦ I ON-GRADE 3AMELANCHIER - 62'-S I I MASONRY CAN S- PROPOSED 121 S.F. POSED I II PATIO 8'-10*HT. ON-GRADE I 1 / 10•-0" LAWN 13d' GRAVEL PAD WITH — 1.0- 8'X8' 1ST-7 40••7 NOW 5 JUNIPERUS FLUSH MASONRY SPA ♦ + DISTURBANCE VIRGINIANA- BORDER lord' TOC"-0' 62'-6" I 1 62'-T r BUFFER + + 8'-10'HT 37-3' I 81LEX 3 MORELLA + + + VERTICILLATA- PENSYLVANICA- ILI- SO-3 1 SD.2 lord' I I a I 3'-4 HT. 4'-5'HT. 13�--- +i /� 8.-0" PROPO D 1 I NDS M O 62'•4P CHAN + + + STRIP 7D-RAM + PROPOSED FLUSH PROPOSED 8-DIA.X 8'HT. T PROPOSED 30 S.F. + MASONRY BORDER ' DRYWELLS(SEE DETAIL 1) 4'-8" ♦ MASONRY STEPS + + + is 62'-6 BS 57-6' + + + + + 62'-6' + + + 62'- 85'-0' +BWST-6' PLANTING N 37-19'28"W 100'SETBACK FROM---�./ EXISTING FENCE , TOP OF BLUFF I PROPOSED MASONRY PROPOSED 4'H.WIRE RELOCATED ¢ice _ RETAINING WALL TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED 4'H. MESH POOL FENCE PROPANE TANK —COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE WOOD POOL FENCE AS SHOWN ON COASTAL EROSION AREA 15 MORELLA PROPOSED SILT FENCE MAP PHOTO No.51-009-83 SHEET 15 OF 49 PENSYLVANICA-7 GAL (SEE DETAIL 2) qj TIE LINE OF AVERAGE BLUFF 80 VACCINIUM LINE AS SHOWN ON FILED ANGUSTIFOLIUM-1 GAL. MAP .a (1)Le&ara Holdings,LLC Taken January 11,2018 Looking ESE (2)Le&ara Holdings,LLC Taken january 11,2018 " ig�'s�-�•e�r�.�i—s��ii� '�a.. .. =,: of`,. Looking SE t- cc / } wo y .,rr - It �� { �.'l R 4�f ►A' fat y . ' tits / :s'•• 1I � was sxc<,-7 re. 4141 '=� f IN4. }:` 't�.` '�.• 7 ��R;jR'!•!ge�,tt��r ;J"F{� .� '- .. .41 11 yJ ffi' 'x r.`�F. i ��� �a'b;viftd'�`�� ,Q� •' � '� 3Y�'3,�:.. f• y�1 i •� M °i 1• p f„ a 9 � Ia r..•� tlli9. +N.. • , , � � 'gav+•-r�► '�t� 1.. � 1f S '-. f tQi•.• � ��rY i.fes j� 2. I �r n . •1 ��t. f ♦ti u i�' +� i rt'e f � '.- �gl��h �.j"i3 � �'gt ��-�_E. �'• 1 � 4 �ilr 4 r 1 i•• EL jj Pt a' ` �yy'd� � �� t:.� ��•� + " � � f4y �1•� _ �' � � t rl� �1'�Y� ��r�y' '�"�'i , 5• + , {�; , IGI At- �,� .r'd•'.��.,��s� - .. 4" �r�is . . s� 3 y+, .', .�A��.� y�,� ,ps��;tiJ� j �� •+ ;. �r��' .� �a •�� 1•4'`l e{ .'`4 .. 'r•, tN :.�„�. �:� t'' .!�.i�•►r�.�' sgvA' ♦• �'t E�T� Z �'f�y 7 ��� � �t � n' �.�1 � i�iS��Errv:' Y•'t'tvZ'F�R4�"� 1 l :y t � 1 4 kr Iv s' r, e W Y + 8 r = cl,Iq t1 a t� '`j 1 i,A►(ti y i b �R3�i • �r^ f BtR I �' N �!�4• yi�,a�� W(' �� rp;.. I+, Jt ; i_•.I d " tit'r' �' ✓;� i ri f�q.�t; tiR�`f 1 S + F . �J � .. • ri s�,n '+ ,!• \v `t ' - r ��a,� �•4 ai. li�.�b�c� ��4a�v'��lrya' ��)if;: � ,/�t'�i,a` _ �♦ ��°�'�i it • • Z P. k + �t a�� Rl �3r tom; �iry�yy, 13 '%ti .1 G ;.+'�'iY' - - its �� t � .. �.} 7S.t �� �•I 4er, / C ry� '+ '.is 1 �' •� 'I,' 1. 1 zip .moi Y �'`•• "'I r am ot Qv _�„� „ aha ' ' � �j ®,F•< s;- �'"��,�` i, _,0 '` �Orr g t 7J s 14 /���i'_ ice' �� ��,' y/./'n/ � l .�/,�I�/ i - s s • . w b 9 w Ow A. 4§1 ftlk ..rte ti �, �'� (13)Lefkara LLC " . �.:n- 'r -» _; `• " - Taken January 11,2018 A g 1 Looking West Ia, r T1 t l , •r A Y1 Air'�' I (14)Lefkara LLC ��`- Taken January 11,2018 °' Looking WNW _ T®'V!/ - F SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD / O ,% u C STREET 70 VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ,EGA J' 7' /4a pe j ! L°@ G � �t C s (y/ 2 FORMER OW ER A Ae.--t- 7es©a.leka N E AC J,*L) , •► /j� �J yr-,k)r`�' 0a-- cv c,-WE -.� /�'!a S W, TYPE OF BUILDING RES_ to SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS ,2-1 2 /,o �� b sra�rAsa � O - RA04 % Y. % �� L �6a 4Z o o <`/�`� g6 I 1 3 1�1 � m i Lam./�.�'(�, Ido ..P_ � ti.1�C7 I�,'[•�;'W ,arzarcu L--c''t Zt 2-cc> �I 5�P 7.c I c; �7 ► � v��fo r �a> ;���Tra,�eo ! -�zc E- -e Sor-/ex o ) L20-94 6'o � � o a 6 Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER 6 7 1 Noodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD ' D Meadowland DEPTH 2 (�f -iouse Plot BULKHEAD fotoI COLOR TRIM Q eaa - �J ? Co 7 ;- r Extension -4' ~q• IFF- -.-FFFt Extension € N Extension J Foundation Q L Bath 5 ��Z Dinette Porch Basement �1 Floors K. f 12 Porch Ext. Walls 4Tov-e v� Interior Finish S LR. Breezeway Fire Place l Heat DR. Garage Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR. 'Patio Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B O. B. Dormer Driveway Total , J - F ® FOL��® J ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC may. �/y Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK %� P.O.Box 1179 C4 Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS p ® Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER �' ®�' Telephone(631)765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER wkw.southoldtownny.gov FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: January 31, 2018 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7158 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appealso. 7158 f r Lefkara Holdings,LLC The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant's Project Description Questionnaire Agricultural Data Statement Short Environmental Assessment Form Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form(s) Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Forms) �LWRP Consistency Assessment Form _,L_Notice(s) of Disapproval Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization Certificate(s) of Occupancy Findings, Deliberations and DeterminationMe"eting(s) Action of the Board of Appeals Photos _Correspondence-A dOf Orujo;zaf J' t P� L&Ehm AA&o LLC Copy of Deed(s) Ll Building Permit(s) T roperty Record Card(s) urvey/Site Plan aps- Drawings Misc. Building Dept. forms (Certificate of Compliance, Housing Code Inspection, ect.) Misc. Paperwork- � f * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 01/31/18 Receipt#: 234013 Quantity Transactions Refe nce Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7158 $1,000.00 otal Paid: $1,00000 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#182 $500.00 Lefkara, LIc CK#221 $500.00 Lefkara, Llc Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Lefkara, Llc 100 Brompton Road Garden City, NY 11530 Clerk ID: SABRINA Internal ID.7158 i ZBA TO TOWN CLERK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE : JANUARY 18, 2017 ZBA# NAME OF APPLICANT CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP LEFKARA HOLDINGS, RECEIVED 7158 LLC 182 $500.00 JAN 26 2018 LEFKARA HOLDINGS, Southold Town Clerk 7158 LLC 221 $500.00 TOTAL $1000.00 Sent via Inter-Office to Town Clerk by: ES Thank you. r-,�+r,-^A�.. ��, ..u:,. ��.,—;�'�- '.�:�+�:�iY:�' R,..7.^S r •s..�� e..�. _. ....,... .rv,� Sa<^,�.�,,..,ev 6�'� 'c. ��"x'' �'"" ::r .,�i. �'Ca �• ���K.�na:.'.`w.-- `vim" '°�'' `''. { :`k ",.4•. 't. �+, v, ..ia:'�?f.•,a ..tin ' Y 3 � •�4yw�'.'�e"r.°x1- .t.: ;;uSd' ,-...+ .'9 ;%i.• '.i:'+�; ss�5 n.A'.�;:sg.i:7.i".',. ;,,4`,-�, r'c:,.`'�;: - xt• j'. -��§l:{.<,'�.., ¢i,•ati. : .� - 1=Pl2to':� ,�.`a:, 't.;,.�.�': •SF's •NGS LL''C,,."-' ;. ;::.'a.,• [EFKARA HOL®1 x100 BROMPTON RD. "fib;{{-;`GARDEN CITY,NY 11530-2704 DATE # a^",PMTOTFE I,/J t ' '` S`. ommv,oxer' , ` CHASE �`p -•7PMorgan Chase Stank,NA www.Chase.com ¢¢ fY ' •MEMO l /t2` ® � K✓YL� A�' :'e,i tkj ;4+�Y{:jv�+.',I' .•i. _�e�,'�a.. �ji't y�q,^.:? W.���'",::L.�•Li �MYvy"•-6°::�.y ',:xs 4Y„:'ro:`A`b✓•+��''+�v+"�6'�c..:Y+'W?^i...�.w:,..:".1i�Y-�,..;:�w"'.i':•..•'•:-`r✓.,`S"3<'�,�'� �'.{�,'C?:� �t�{`��:� "*i"---"`�''";'�,='V�+�"'`'.i'C�'" _4^':' �&�Y.'Mo,�.:�,.uTe?..+ ,'`;��:;c�'a:^ �3s;,:......;.".�.,` _ '=•p;,.,..-+�"..._-_::;•?:` -'^,^a:°;';::�,.'..'SY,:+N,2f:" .;C.:g••iiii` . . ,h� ,> wa7�-L,.,�c••tid�`;'`;5f;',..i+pv a};. . ,. `l, -;�. 't,Y<• LEFKARA'HOLbI P "` 21—o75s c' 1 BROMPTON RD. AV ' F-a,^tGARDEN Cl 530-2704 -� '' G� DATE - � ,�;�{,!?YTOTHE v':• z;a Sti}ORDER OF i'*• .e /—/ p, Swab fau+s°;��'-S DOLLARS HASE JPMdrgan k, Chase Elan 9 A. ,• iWWW.C�'185//BQL.COlr1 hh`�('�/,� /�,��J/ J(� /� ,: MEMO �V �t7 ��`C �W/YJ� �1 / J ap' .� ,a'xL��w��..:.•�.`''.-:s�*'j`'�;«.:".j: `.;.>„�3'...��5^ �.,""+a�s.w s" :,..,,,�y�{. ,a:t ��y,�( w�,y(� .�.,E.,.� ,ir., r t�'J �E. :•.,, P. �.<. .�3.. �„�5:'+”ea5a5•�+?�,".:'*'aN.�ttn^`'r+4J.t�'�v , },.!^i.�+��,�y.�ry^� RECEIVED SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS JAN 19 2018 PRIOR FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS ZONING 130ARD0PAppEALS REQUEST RELIEF FOR LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK FROM BLUFF PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XXII, SECTION 280-116 a. (1) AND RELIEF TO EXCEED PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XXIII, SECTION 280-124 DISTANCE FROM BLUFF 1. ZBA File: 4245 Approval to construct pool and deck area no closer than 50 feet from top of bluff. The Board found it was not uncommon for parcels along the Sound bluff to require variances for accessory structures within 100 feet of the bluff due to the limited available building area after meeting all other setback requirements of the zoning code (6 c) 2. ZBA File: 4750 Approval to construct a 16'x32' in-ground pool no less than 60 feet from the actual top of bluff 3. ZBA File: 4794 Approval to construct a 20'x40' pool whose seaward edge shall be no closer than 50 feet from the top of the sound bluff. 4. ZBA File: 5629 Approval to construct a 20'x40' in-ground pool no less than 64 feet from top of bluff. 5. ZBA File: 6027 Approval to construct an 18'x 36 ` in-ground pool no less than 70 feet from top of bluff INCREASE IN LOT COVERAGE 1. ZBA file: 6027 Approval to grant relief from the permitted lot coverage of 20% where the lot coverage without the pool is 20.5% wherein the Board approved 23%. a = — �' ten `017 0B 77A(c1 ' t]A / d� ma T° e3 M p n 80 a1 as m � A70 ( O w0 °°w p n oy4t tmv iaen 11 es 511n I�xentcO mn 3` 2 a °a r a wa �� r l to mo 81 IS, 02 0° ttx 11 a i AID m 11 Wa snq WPFx�7 7iJ / mo 55 T � 716 TT 70 53 50 itB t 12 - � 117 e, I9 a 44 CRESCF � xx Ito n+ na w' I 10 n � NT „ w' tro tre txo a 8 / aw z 333° at tm tae tm ,Np`1 � +xt I • f � Ia '�' 96 � � Wt ox'P 30� f03 to _tee, a to '9I- tII man IS m 102 � C� to i° 15 � tW 1x9 103 � A t�EE SEFOR C6N7O10 _ �w ��"9 » • 279 2D 031220 1 xt1] 1x11 ��. W w w � ty I L w tt +Z7 w a ° 10 23 1x11 xa / 22 a 7f7 q c rn� a x j w W to �� I G) 010 r Im 1 ��� �°� Co / 035-02-0711.7 FOR POC NO I SEE SEC NO. I - 4 FOR PCC NO. 035-M-0itFOR PCL NO l YVV�f� _ FOR PCL NO SEESMNO '✓,,a / SEE BEC NO - SEESEO NO t, 03502-01?t FORPCL NO O 035014175 C35 WM —SEE SEC.NO 03502-012 xm ,/ -------------- ------------------ —_—_—_�--____ —.�__ �-- — —__� ♦9�' _ xm e R taESEcxo mt NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K onet oc SOUTHM SECTION NO —�— W� e tz7y W, r --xx-- "�. Real Property Tax Service Agency v t .r ^^ o a•�u. —_— 4xWmir --f-- mau.--.-- usxtutsunvwwPWvmvmrtn C°uM/O,MRMMW.xYfisM M ® JO a-�-. r a.Nnsau —__— owrm --.-- osu.--wr-- wnurtwmrtxrrmw0a as,� m A �uPPoxmryWrmise�xet P ostxcrxo logo PROPERTYMA CWMuxOxaacb�4aWa 0� s, APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman 4 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Robert A. Villa Fax (516) 765-1823 Richard C. Wilton Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS1.3 19 -7/TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION JAN 1.0 2018 ZONING BOARD OFgPPEALS Appl. No. 4245. Application of GEORGE and SUSAN TSAVARIS for a Variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4A for permission to locate swimmingpool with fence enclosure within 100 feet of bluff of the Long Island Sound. Location of Property: 2170 The Strand, Lot 111 at Pebble Beach Farms, East Marion, NY; Parcel ID No. 1000-30-2-53. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 8, 1994, at which time persons desiring to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 1. This is an application for a Variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4A for approval of an accessory swimming pool structure with fence enclosure in the rear yard area of the subject premises. A variance is required for the reason that the rear yard encompasses that area within 100 feet of the Long Island Sound bluff. The setbacks of the pool structure are proposed at not closer than 10 feet to the easterly side property line and not closer than 50 feet to the existing line at the top of the bluff (or bank) of the L.I. Sound. 2. This property is known and identified as Lot No. 111 on the "Map of Pebble Beach Farms" and is improved with a single-family, two-story dwelling with porch situated at 55-1/2 feet from the closest distance to the top of the bluff line and located 100 feet from the average top of bluff shown on the filed subdivision .map. Also existing at the premises is an antenna dish structure, barbecue "burner," play area and deck landward of the top of the bluff. I /) Pap, 2 - Appl. No. 4245 RECEIVED Application of GEORGE & SUSAN TSAVARIS Decision Rendered June 8, 1994 JAN I -'0141VG BOARD OFAPPEAg g There are steps also located sloping down the bluff to the beach area at the bottom of the bluff. 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4A of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach of shall be set back not less than one hundred (100) feet from the top of such bluff or bank. 5. In considering this application, the Board finds as follows: (a) the overall dimensions of the in-ground swimming pool, as proposed, are 30 ft. by 15 ft. (b) the in-ground swimming pool is shown to be detached as an accessory structure; (c) there are cedar trees existing along the easterly side of the property which will continue to be maintained for screening purposes; (d) there is no other location to locate this swimming pool on this property without other variances and further consideration. The alternatives are not more feasible under the circumstances. (e) this application is strictly for an in ground swimming pool and patio areas at ground level and fence enclosure which are also subject to the approval of the building inspector. 6. It is the position of this Board that in considering this application: (a) the relief requested is in this application is not substantial in relation to those buildings existing generally in the neighborhood and along this Sound bluff;, (b) a swimming pool structure with fence enclosure are permitted accessory uses incidental to the main use of the premises, to wit: residential. (c) it is not uncommon for parcels along the Sound bluff to require variances for accessory structures within 100 feet of the bluff due to the limited available building area after meeting all other setback requirements of the zoning code; (d) there are similar structures in the immediate neighborhood to the west; Page 3 - Appl. No. 4245 RECEIVED Application of GEORGE & SUSAN TSAVARIS Decision Rendered June 8, 1994 JAN 19 2016 ZONyNG BOARD OF APPEALS (e) the difficulties are uniquely related to the character, layout and size ,of the property, and the difficulties claimed are not personal to the landowner; (f) the amount of relief requested will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, nor will it prevent neighboring properties from enjoyment of their properties; (g) in view of all the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting relief, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Member Wilton, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a variance for an accessory swimming pool structure placed in a horizontal position, with fence enclosure SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the cedar trees as exist be properly maintained in good condition (prior ZBA Appeal No. 4080); 2. That there be no physical disturbance to or near the bluff area (north of the proposed swimming pool location); 3. That• the appellants must apply for and receive a building permit (and other agency approvals which may be deemed necessary) for these new structures before commencing construction activities. 4. That there be no adverse (or overhead) lighting that may affect other properties. 5. That drainage of the pool water, when necessary, be placed within a backwash cistern or dry wells (landward of the pool area) . 6. That the swimming pool remain detached without a physical connection to the house. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Dinizio Villa and Wilton. This resolution was duly adopted. RECEIVED AND FILft 13Y lk T-1-:1E, SO V l T-17OLD TOWN YY N CLJ-RK / DATE , / FLOUR GERARD P. G RINGER 014 11 CHAIRMAN aouth s bf: :urevEYEr-; P— ,go- 4- EAST NA,C) l". Tow til OF 50U"rFHC-: , "�,"Y, A\ 7'j,.4 T RECEIVED JAN 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I Ov 94 �k WeLL C" PL -graps op APPEAe-i BOARD MEMBERS p Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman �� Gym 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. y =� P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora Southold,New York 11971 Lora S. Collins y ® ��� ZBA Fax(516)765-9064 George Horning 91 Telephone(516)765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rAo FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS, and DETERMINATION ��C� MEETING HELD DECEMBER 1, 1999 JAN 10 2010 Appl. No. 4.750- RICHARD RIBAUDO ZONINGBOARD OFAPP Street and Location: 1920 The Strand, East Marion 1000-30-2-56 �A� Date of Public Hearing: October 14, 1999; November 18, 1999 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS: The subject property consists of 26,636 sq. ft. with 77 feet frontage on The Strand and 70 feet frontage on Long Island Sound, in East Marion. The top of the Sound bluff is about 200 feet from the front property line when measured along the westerly edge of the property, and about 230 feet from the front line when measured along the easterly edge. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Permit No. 25961-Z was issued August 17, 1999 for construction of a single-family dwelling and in-ground pool. Applicant later sought to amend the Permit to place the house and pool closer to the top of the bluff. The Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated September 13, 1999 states that the proposed "amendment to permit#25961 to move placement of house and pool, places pool within 100 feet of top of bluff. Placement of pool not in compliance with Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4A.1 which states ... All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank ... shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100)feet from the top of such bluff or bank." AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing location of the 16 x 32 foot pool approximately 86.5 feet from the "average line of the bluff' at the closest point, with an on-grade patio extending 6 feet further toward the bluff. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION, DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) The subject lot is totally undeveloped. The top of the bluff runs at an angle across the lot, leaving a property that is 200 feet deep behind the bluff at its westerly side and 230 feet deep at its easterly side. Applicant wishes to locate his house roughly in line with the existing houses on adjacent lots to the east and west. If the house is so located, no pool can be built on the Sound side of the house without variance relief from the 100-foot setback requirement. (2) Applicant's request for a building permit was made with reference to setback from the "average line of the bluff," a straight line that is found on the original subdivision map. The survey submitted with applicant's request to amend the permit shows that at the westerly side of his property, the actual top of the bluff on his property is about 32-1/2 feet behind the "average line of the bluff' and that at the easterly side of the property the actual top of the bluff is about 7-112 feet behind the "average line." Page 2-December 1, 1999 Appl. No.4750- 1000-30-2-56 at East Marion (Ribaudo) '77/ Southold Town Board of Appeals RECEIVED JAN 1.9 2010 ZONING BOARD OI°APPEALS (3) Applicant asks to place the pool approximately 86.5 feet from the "average line of the bluff' at the closest point; that is approximately 53.8 feet from the actual top of the bluff. Applicant's original application for Building Permit # 25961 placed the pool 100 feet from the "average line"which would be approximately 67.8 feet from the actual top of the bluff. (4) The report of October 14, 1999 from the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District states that the bluff appears to be fairly stable at applicant's property. (5) Grant of the relief set forth below will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties because location of the house and pool will be consistent with the configuration of structures on neighboring properties. (6) The action set forth below is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of a house and pool in a desirable location on his property while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Tortora, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the variance applied for and ALTERNATIVELY to GRANT a variance authorizing location of the 16' by 32' in-ground pool no less than 60 feet from the actual top of the bluff at the closest point, which would be approximately 93 feet from the "average line of the bluff' at such point, subject to the following CONDITIONS: (1) If the patio around the pool is built to any degree above grade, the Sound-facing edge of such patio shall be not closer than 60 feet from the actual top of the bluff. (2) All drainage from the pool shall be directed away from the bluff and retained 'in a dry well landward of the pool. (3) The pool shall be unenclosed, apart from the fencing required by law. Any illumination shall be shielded so as not to affect neighboring properties. (4) The pool and surrounding patio shall not be structurally connected to the house. (5) There shall be no disturbance of land at the north side of the pool. VO E y : oehringer, Dinizio ora. (Members Collins and t� r�► �a a 9h lj i ,; o�Vn Nas duly ado p (3- i ' r - RARD P. GOEHR NGER, CHAIR AN o�l�, I luv.n _ n i UV IZ) 70 �37OH o ' lSNb'dX3 �a3emt '09/M ODdSS3.? 3000 °= 3000 f sodo�d ,5 ti ,01 v O!1 d3S 03 Odolld V&Y 000 • �g� 91� 4vol Z H3! QN3 a� d0 dovd 7OOd 0-4ONnoyo-NI '17f X ,9l r � 107 no dp 3�d83�d 30 ,fj 3d S flogavifj k D3NR NO 83MJ00 3d ' � yt'Rf g y p,Vw'cr'.2,�+`��'p «••.s .��; �� ,. ..���-.r.is't } T{99S7l�s.TlYa+�>"�Y�aA'LtYryS:�1�4Y�CR{�l/'�Lt1yw��F�e4+6�d��gL�.C�fyO'y�.G+�..f�'iai`� MMMCS C. S RL A 1�LdFl JO J.l�t.{l�R.i.iA•�-c�i Azw Ilii o"),Y.e'..`s r l ' ;O �M N v v .CD 0 3 at� �a NOI O,oS r . Fa �� 1t APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �O C� Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer,Chairman �� Gym 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. y =� P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora G Southold, New York 11971 Lora S. Collins y o�� ZBA Fax(516)765-9064 George Horning �oj , �,a "-- ---_�'�'�fieptton ifj765-IfH9- BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERM NAT av MEETING OF APRIL 19, 2000 — – — --- – Appl. No. 4794- MARK LAMPL 1000-30-2-81 _.___ :_ ECEIVED Location of Property: 910 The Strand, Pebble Beach Lot 127, Eas Marion Date of Public Hearing: April 6, 2000 FINDINGS OF FACT ONJNG BOARD OF APPEALS PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 23,375 sq. ft. waterfront parcel located on The Strand Way in East Marion. The property is improved with a 1 and 2-story frame house with side yards at 12.9 feet on each side, existing front yard at 68.2 feet, and setback from the rear deck to the top of bluff at 75+- feet (66+- feet at the closest point to the west over the adjoining parcel). BASIS OF APPEAL- Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated January 25, 2000, denying an application for a permit to build an inground swimming pool because it will be setback less than , 100 feet of the bluff as required by Code Section 100-239.4A(1). RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing a 20 x 40 swimming pool in a location 42 feet from the top of the bluff, measured on a line drawn perpendicular from the center of the existing house and deck. At the hearing on April 6th, applicant indicated that alternative relief would be acceptable. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION, DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) The center of the existing deck on the rear of the house is 75 feet from the top of the bluff The slope of the land and the existing setback from the street make a pool in the front yard impractical. Consequently, installation of a pool requires a setback variance. (2) Swimming pools in rear yards are not uncommon in the neighborhood, and construction of a conventional pool on applicant's property, unenclosed except for required fencing, will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. (3) A report from the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District states that vegetation on the bluff is dense, and finds no problem with a pool located near the house as proposed. Although the Board heard testimony from an area resident to the effect that pools on the Sound bluff are a threat to the community wellbeing, no evidence was introduced to indicate that grant of the relief set forth below will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. Fuge 2 -April 19, 2000 �]J ZBA Appl. No. 4794 - M. Lampl RECENED Re: 1000-30-2-81 JAN A 40NTNG BOARD OFAPPEALS (4) The action set forth below is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of a swimming pool while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION: On motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Tortora, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the relief as applied for, and ALTERNATIVELY to GRANT variance relief authorizing construction of a pool whose seaward edge shall be no closer than 50 feet from the top of the Sound bluff, measured on a line drawn perpendicular from the center of the existing house and deck, subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. Any decking around the pool that is above grade shall count as part of the pool for purposes of measuring the setback; No physical connection to the house; 2. Drywell(s) shall be installed and no drainage of any sort shall be directed over the bluff. 'VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: Members Go ger airman), Dinizio d Tortora. (Members Horning and Collins were abse This R olution 7dd3-0). /4/21'0/00, RARD P. GOEHRIN R IRMAN I IV V 111 01 PE13131 E' 131 A('I1 (, I tij / / ♦w IFILE No 6266 TILED ilillr 11 SMUATIP Al d �� °=4, y EAST MARION / TOWN OF 501111101 SUFFOLK COUNT'7, IALW S C TAX No 10n0- 30-.- SCALE 1'=?t) OCTOBER 8 l 0q9 ' - 23 � AREA = 4 5575c� Tn t r i ex, 0 ps J �. En / , v r y f m � r Y 1L td'y" � I mai �`i: T ` } �� � �. •` ' l� n ,y ti •� o� � •� e �` 6 7 ' Af ri M �gU1i FOLXc APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Off_ OG Southold Town Hall Ruth D.'Oliva, Chairwoman ::z'- y� '�I 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer y RECEIVED P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A.Tortora "* Southold,NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando 'yO!� JAN 2018 Tel.(631) 765.1809 James Dinizio,Jr. Ol rt �a Fax(631) 765-9064 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS http:,'/southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD `� //'JD R:/n FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION +oUit MEETING OF DECEMBER 29, 2004 - o ovun .r ZB Ref. No. 5629—ALEX KOUTSOUBIS Property Location: 1610 The Strand East Marion; CTM 30-2-64 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 26,528 sq. ft. lot,has 75.01 feet along The Strand and 77 feet along the Long Island Sound, in East Marion. The property is shown as Lot 118 on the Map of Pebble Beach Farms, and is improved with a single-family, two-story frame dwelling as shown on the July 17, 2002 survey, amended August 10, 2004 by Robert Allan Haynes, L.S. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's August 16, 2004 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-239.46 in its denial of a building permit for a proposed in-ground swimming pool at less than the code required minimum 100 feet from the top of the bluff or bank adjacent to the Long Island Sound. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 16, 2004 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant wishes to construct a 20' x 40' in-ground swimming pool. In the original application, the applicants requested a location for the pool at 41 feet, perpendicular to the bluff, with a grade-level patio extending 10 ft. from all sides of the pool, as shown on the December 6, 2004 diagram prepared by Proper-T Permit Services. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOMAMENDED RELIEF: During the December 16, 2004 public hearing, the applicant was requested to increase the setback for a possible alternative that would be more conforming to the code's bluff setback requirement of 100 feet. On December 16, 2004, the applicant submitted a revised diagram showing a revised angle of the pool, turned to be parallel with the bluff line. This new diagram indicates that the same pool would not be able to be placed at 68 feet from the bluff, as suggested at the public hearing. Page 2—December 29, 2004 RECEIVED ZB Ref. No.5629—A. Koutsoubis CTM Id:30-2-64 JAN 10 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the'Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the alternative location will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. A swimming pool is a customary accessory structures for residential properties. After considering testimony during the hearing, the applicant increased the setback of the pool. Much of the property is landscaped (belgium curb driveway with parking, patios, walkways, terraces). The pool as proposed will be located in the rear yard 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The lot has frontage along the Sound, and is long and narrow. The location of the dwelling is 120+-feet from the top of the bluff and 60 feet from the front lint line facing The Strand, which precludes locating the pool in the front yard. 3. The alternative relief results in a reduction of 36 feet from the 100 ft. setback requirement, resulting in a setback of 64 feet. 4. The difficulty has not been self-created. The width of the lot and existence of a dwelling leaves little available space to place accessory structures. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the alternative is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an accessory swimming pool structure, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Orlando, and duly carried, to DENY the requested 41 ft. setback as appy for, and to GRANT alternate relief with a minim 64 ft. s tback from the top of the bluff. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly I ' Page 3—December 29, 2004 ZB Ref. No. 5629—A. Koutsoubis RECEIVED CTM Id: 30-2-64 JAN 10 2090 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Orlando (Acting Chairm n), o er n inizio. Absent were Chairwoman Oliva and Member Tortora. This Resolu w e -0). Vincent Orlando, Actfid C air n 1/ /05 Approved for Filing SuFtvE:Y NO. 7Pre p. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON. ` ✓v1-]S_/ FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE STRUCTURES. ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT THE PROPERTY LINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES ADORIONAL STRUCTURES ` OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT. 011.9T7?I OT R000- SEC TIOW 30- ?rAX &LOC4 2 02�40 ;41 �aT APR�A5 P MAPK ir3 rtAP' tj Ta� o it Vic} As F A5 0 `f pr loop ge t o k 1 �es19 ��r, p sr`ft,ac� � J 5� G�� AAvol hili/ - `$4 ' t5 vbt � rc� �6a PAf1G s� i $•� �. - 7fi w ` X . b SS <, 20 I SRR G - v 1Z .' 3i.�o �aJSE _ ..i L 0 µe0 i C ry � G �U Ott• � N_� �_ �8.� C7n URS t �= NOr�:9d/4D/�G OFIYErS AiIDSap 00 �L•6�\ \VJ ME/fSU,PcMc',f/T TD F04DOAT o�c/• ' .1 c. Lb`t xP�l P.POPD6e O .�.Qi Y6W�f Y B'�4 E %I J ��11 4-10,14t ��V rNM�u/-'.4.i1J 3 pT/c p, �.(o � s7'S'rcrns o/Ndfio,✓S�1'eskE.cY� s�op• ,I 0. M 0�fib. x MAP OF PROPERTY HAYNES LAND SURVEYORS SITUATE AT 741 B WEST JERICHO TURNPIKE cAsr Ismeo" HUNT , N.Y.11743 b 718-631-75957595 631.692-8728 TOWN of S0vTy061' svFCoc.K CoUNry,Al y RECORDS OF WALTER 1 6ROWNE&GUSTAVE A ROULLIER UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OA ADDITION rO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 720?OF THE NEW YORK STATE SURVEYED-,111,41- 5clRVEy -rider/7 LOdrQF lv'r EDUCATION LAW. G.�7f�SurD POLL A�/ORQrlO AOlJ4ta r4LQ1 /D,2OD¢ �<('.� pi-LAVO HE LA SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT FEARING MF SED SEALS ALL NOT BE CONSIDERED GUARANTEED TO:-- 0 as A VALID TRUE COPY. 'UARANTEES Ox CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED IEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON I r ? OR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND �O IN HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COWPA}dY, 0 'OYERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING , i SAe FANO SVP VSTITUTION LISTED HEREON,AND TO THE LOT NUMBERS 'AZEfBA2 7P b MAof pSB94e UARANTG INSTITUTION. EEOSFORHCER7NFSCATIONS ARE NOT ��ACKFiIRMS'FlLEO en/ ,/un/E /I/ J07 I tAHSFERARLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS ASAIA.0 R SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. vaT�r7�rR o s%Qe�YavvoQ u Sv,�v�rpaT��J-/a-/.T gr7 C es7V P�Cp�4/N;TNt(i7wcyz KLINE TRADING CORP 019233 , JAN R 9 201 `7/ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERSaili BARD OF APPEALS o��pE SO(/T�OI Southold Town Hall James Dinizio,Jr., Chairman - h 4 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1170 Gerard P. Goehringer Southold,NY 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva us ye Office Location: Michael A. SimonO i� Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman �'`mutm,� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ;JIAfI Tel.(b31)7b5-1809•Fax(631)7b5-90b4 " FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATI OCT -712- 20 MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 ZB File No. 6027 -Nick Katopodis(or John Frankis) (0 U_ ID®ICS Tow Clerk Property Location: 1540 The Strand,East Marion CTM 30-2-65 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further reviews under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIyE CODE: This application has -been referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning reply dated May 2, 2007 states that the application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county- wide or inter-community impact. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is 26,605 square feet in total size, and has 77.08 feet along The Strand, and is a nonconforming lot located in an R-40 Low-Density Residential Zone District, having 77 feet along a tie line of the Long Island Sound, 345.39 feet in depth along the westerly side line. The top of the bluff boundary is shown along a 68 ft. elevation above mean sea level contour line, north of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The parcel is improved an existing single-family two-story dwelling, as shown on survey prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S. dated July 15, 2004, updated August 28, 2007. BASIS OF APPLICATION: This application for Variances under Section 280-116 is based on the Building Inspector's June 14, 2007 amended Notice of Disapproval for a proposed accessory swimming pool with related pool equipment: (1) at less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff adjacent to the Long Island Sound, and (2) with lot coverage in excess of the code limitation of 20%. LWRP CODE DETERMINATION: LWRP Coordinator Mark Terry sent a letter dated May 18, 2007 to the Board of Appeals stating inconsistencies with the policies and standards of Code Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Code and Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). Grant of alternative relief with conditions, noted in the Board's determination, infra, will substantially mitigate concerns and will increase the proposed setback from 50 feet to 70 feet for a proposed in-ground accessory swimming pool under the policies and standards of the LWRP and recommendation for 100 ft. setback from the top of the bluff. A drywell system will also be a requirement for use at all times pool drainage becomes necessary to further LWRP Policy 5. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT: A report was submitted to the Board of Appeals by the Soil and Water Conservation District noting that RECEIVED �l Page,2 0£3-September 27,2 ZBA File No.6027-N.Katopodis J�� ���� CTM 30-2-65 ZONING BOAR®OF APPS the May 8, 2007 survey prepared by John T. Metzger indicates that the grade around the proposed pool will be two or more feet greater in elevation than the top of the bluff, allowing storm water runoff to flow toward the bluff and down the face of the bluff, which could jeopardize bluff stability. The Report indicates that the face of the bluff is well- vegetated with grasses, weeds, and woody shrubs and appears to extend down to the toe, indicating that the bluff is currently stable. The Report recommends that existing grades in the rear yards, which currently slope away from the bluff and toward the street, be maintained. AREA VARIANCE/RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant filed an appeal application originally requesting a 50 ft. setback variance from the top of the bluff along Long Island Sound, where the code requires 100 feet, to construct a 20 ft. by 40 ft. in-ground pool on a north/south axis, proposed as shown on the May 8, 2007 survey prepared by John T. Metzger,Land Surveyor, AREA VARIANCE/AMENDED RELIEF: During the May 18, 2007 public hearing, the Board asked the applicant to consider reducing the size of the pool and to bring the pool setback into more conformity with the code-required 100 foot setback, and the applicant agreed. On September 21, 2007, the applicant submitted an amended survey dated August 28, 2007, showing a reduction in size of the pool from 40' by 20' to 36 ft. by 18 ft., increasing the setback from 50 feet to 60 feet from the top of the bluff, and showing the locations of the underground propane tank and well. The August 28, 2007 amended survey also shows an alternative that re-orients the pool on an east/west axis, shows the existing grade with slopes toward the road and away from the bluff, and a requested variance for lot coverage at 24.6%,where the code requires a maximum of 20%of the buildable area. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented,materials submitted and personal inspections,the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3)(1), Grant of alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's neighbor to the west has an in-ground pool, and there are other accessory pools throughout the neighborhood. The neighbor to the east expressed concern about increased noise and loss of privacy should the applicant's request for a pool be approved. Alternate relief with conditions can mitigate those concerns. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than the relief granted because the current lot coverage without the proposed pool is 20.5% while the code requires a maximum of 20%. An underground propane tank is located on the east side of the house and Professional Engineer Joseph Fischetti and the applicant's attorney confirmed that: "the propane tank supplier states that NFPA standards recommend a minimum distance of 10 feet clearance between the fill line of the tank to other structures." Complying with the code required 100' setback from the bluff would locate the pool approximately 8 feet from the recommended safe distance and the rear of the house. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The alternate relief granted herein is substantial.A setback of 70 feet from the top of the bluff to the proposed pool represents a 30% reduction from the code-required 100 ft. minimum, and lot coverage of 23% represents a 15% variance from the code limitation of 20%. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b) R The alleged difficulty has been self-created. RECEIVED '-7J Page 3 of 3-September 27,20 ZBA File No.6027-N.Katopodis JAN 2 9 2018 CTM 30-2-65 ZONING BOAR®OF APPEALS 6. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the proposed additions will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood as long as the applicant maintains the existing grade in the rear yard with slopes `away from the bluff and a drywell system is installed to contain pool water backwash. 6. Grant of alternate relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an in-ground accessory swimming pool, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to DENY the relief as applied for and TO GRANT THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATE RELIEF: 1. A new accessory swimming pool shall be located at least 70 feet from the top of the bluff on an east/west axis,and 2. The lot coverage shall not exceed 23%of the buildable area of the property, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The pool shall be located no closer than 20 feet from the easterly property line 2. All existing grades with slopes away from the bluff and toward the street shall be maintained 3. The pool equipment shall be located on the west side of the property in a sound dampening cabinet 4. A drywell for pool water backwash shall be located not closer than 70 feet to the top of the bluff. 5. A row of continuous evergreen screening, such as arborvitae, privet hedge, or Leyland cypress, shall be planted and continuously maintained along the easterly and westerly property lines for a minimum of 55 linear feet from the existing dwelling toward the bluff to create visual privacy and a sound dampening barrier between the applicant and the neighbors. That these ZBA conditions be written into ,the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions,or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses,setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Dinizio (Ch ' man), Goehringer, Simon, and Weisman. (Member Oliva was absent.) This lution w s d ly adopted (4-0). RECEIVE® ames Dinizio Jr., C airman 10/ /2007 OCT - 2- 2007 Approved for Filing r L-1 ruentes, Kim From: Peggy Haralambous <parrri@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:05 PM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Re: Lefkara Holdings LLC #7158 1070 The Strand Lane, East Marion NY. Mc m V APR'2 Re: Lefkara Holdings LLC #7158 1070 The Strand Lane, East Marion NY. By°o 1 Neighboring property: 1150 the Strand Lane, opposes the proposal of a shower constructed towards the front of side yard, that faces the street and front yard of 1150 the strand lane. Aft: Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson of Zoning Board of Appeals Dear, Mrs. Weisman, I am writing to you today in reference to the property,and file number mentioned above, requesting variances for additions and alterations to be reviewed at the scheduled hearing set for May 3rd 2018 In addition to the request for approval of an outdoor pool and accessory structures located less than 100 feet from the bluff, a shower is proposed to be built and located in the side yard next to the property line of 1150, The Strand Lane. This private structure, that can be categorized as a bathroom space, is not a permitted obstruction in a side yard, as per the Zoning code of the Town of Southold. This structure has not been approved by the building department. It is a private bathroom space that should not be in line with, visible from, or facing the front yard of another home. It can be easily relocated to a more private and suitable area located in the rear yard where it belongs, and where it will not be visible from the street, or from the front door of our home. In addition, it also poses a hazard since it will take up a great amount of space from the side yard, therefore not allowing enough room for passage in case of an emergency. Consequently, due to the tight circumstances of the proposed additions, we also oppose the use of our property as passage for the construction of the pool and its accessory structures. Therefore I, and the members of my family, respectfully request that you deny approval to this shower and the use of our property for its construction. Your time and help with this issue is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Peggy Mihalios Haralambous Representing Nick Mihalios,owner of 1150 the Strand Lane. 1 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson so Southold 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer O a� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamentoco Southold,NY 11971 9 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOM'I§0fiJtgOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 •Fax(631)765-9064 SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2018. 11:00 A.M. - LEFKARA HOLDINGS LL*55, 18 Request for Variances from Article XXII, Section 280-116A, Article XXIII, S0-124, and the Building Inspector's January 16, 2018, Amended FebruaryNotice of Disapproval based on an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and to construct new accessory structures; 1) less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the bluff; 2) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%; located at: 1070 The Strand, (Adj. to the Long Island Sound) East Marion, NY. SCTM#1000-30-2-77. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: April 19, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 �1/0, LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: http://southtown.northfork.net April 9, 2018 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 -Public Notices for Thursday, May 3, 2018 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of The Suffolk Times. 1) Before April 16th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement, or during the hearing, providing the returned letter to us as soon as possible; AND not later than April 23rd: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later April 25th Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Posting for receipt by our office before May 1, 2018. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. i4U' T10"OE The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold: NAME : LEFKARA HOLDINGS , LLC # 7158 SCTM # : 1000-30-2-77 VARIANCE : BLUFF SETBACK & LOT COVERAGE REQUEST : ADDS ./ALTS . TO DWELLING & NEW POOL WITH SPA DATE : THURS . MAY 31 2078 11 : 00 AM If you are interested in this project, you may, review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (631 ) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of. MAILINGS Lz G (Name of AP 11 ants) SCTM Parcel# 1000- -77 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, /lCI-1,4x11. /e/MA 01Z residing at D. 15OX /D--X7, .f'0PP/-1QL,,0 New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: 41,V /1 ?7/ On the /0 day of ,(��,p/L , 20`8, I-personally mailed at the United States Post Office in ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the (4 Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) Sworn to before me this a TRACEY L. DWYER day of ApY i 1 ) 20/6 NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01 DW6306900 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,20Of� (N ary Public) PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper,the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. MO �rzf 0 7¢ nil c,esro�l•� Z 2,5f .14 ,czV,�,� � E f'O 2A /V, `g C',� ST, L YIVATMIKI IVY 3® z 76 � Q Box F006) r/ DS' 20/ res' z _ 8 ea V Yy,4N pG,4iNV/Zip, NY 14 .6stalervice"m1 -0 ■ e 1tCERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT ® o ■ �- •. � �. u7 Ln RI ru .- IITf,I IA .NY'1(11,02 jjjjj<' ,� • .f1 LYNB (�� 1I lY i 6�3s •wf, 2'.�n fr i':""-nom-- � �.?S �`^:^'a I .V \. SS i! �:L'�..� }] LA', L4 12r• . E rU Certified Mad Fee -' rU Certified Mad Fee $3 45 $3.45 0971 I �- `r1 $ � ` 77 � � $ • Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee a te)" Extra Services&Fees(check box,add tea p �l0 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy $ ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 20 ❑Return Race pt(electronic) $ OSt ark i 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ .�Ppstmar ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ >� n� d d He Q ❑Certified Marl Restricted Delivery $ rF('re O ❑Adult Signature Required $ aJV ' O E]Adult Signature Required $ I O ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ •; p�,�°3' ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ _ Postage $ll.71 a �_,.�� ® Q Postage $0.71 C3 Total Postage and Fees ` `;ll�} ^0/2018 p Total Postage and Fees 04/10/2018 `n sent To $6.91 + $ $6.91 /�/l,.�� ,p� 'fes/r,.y 'l /A a Se t,q��'r �� �Cd t7 //��n/��e §vel•` d�'A f�or �!_Yl���Nf__l__!� �i��o,S riee an PO/V PO 04 !.(L.�4_Rl---a/�/v�__�_, ARX,_7_ Cary,State,ZI +4a - � _S► � Ciry,State,ZIP+ ,r�rrfVa�.4, AlY />!o Dolt A!Y l r 3 :er r r.... :.. r•r., � ■ ' s } CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPTO { ®. I � ®. Ln ru ru .CO CAL f A £�'N '11151 .PL V7 �F 11.803 �a • � •� Certified Mail Fee j Certified Mail Fee $3.45 0971 $ $3.45 0971 6.Services&Fees(check box,add fee as rb e) 77 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee a it 77 1 � ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I I ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ •• [] ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ _ )Aco, k 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $!ji}_ °� CO Simgy � ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ •a O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ der 7r y Adult SI nature Re aired $ C3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ r r C0- ❑ 9 q /, []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ,� I]d [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery #�i''�Vi 4�' �� Postage tr Postage $0■71 '�p $fatal Postage and Fe$es�.r� "Y 018 p Total Postage and Fees �. 04/10/2 +8 ' $6.70 'N Ln $ $6.91 Irl Sent To Sent To 4" jEEY___r ljxrr--- o __-___r -4N�✓_"N---rV O Srreet and Apt.N� P' x No. Stree andAp. o r Boxj1(p UQ� + r ,TFL! I�`��!! V S ---------------- �------ �� -------------------rr- - - - ------- aty srare,ziP+G',p L// C N ` �� ��vf�l�/ 7 ` ®� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , d ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Hoibi/1Gl S Uc SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK I AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of POSTING Z,6�k>w 1101-a&6-Tl, L L C (Name of Applicants) Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as SCTM Parcel#1000- 3®'Z' 77 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, &AC7A&�&. /4/yp CX residing at f 0,,2?GX 404 7 S'DU&-/04P AlY, ,New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the day of AP , 2018,I personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten(10) feet or closer from the street or right-of- way(driveway entrance)—facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be zy� (Signature) Sworn to before me this :15 Day of Mai , 2015 NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK. NO 01 DWG30o900 (� QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY b otary Public) U COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,2DLE� r * near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passerby. J Michael A. Kimack, Esq. � Attorney at Law U.S. POSTAGE PAID P.O.Box 1047 �i SOUTHOLD, NY111111111111111111111111 Ill _ }i 11 71 Southold,N.Y.11971 Po�TdLSERVECEe APAMOUNT _ 7015 0642 0001 5425 2577 1000 �=J✓L Z (� - 11803 _ V v R2304N118466-77 VEST NOTICE Ad 18 2016 4 ��T� pL e� 3 ND NOTICE 6 / aaEli UaR iNl ivIs�a d 160 0E UliAEL_E TO ;:CaRW€tRis IE= SC: 1771317 y7 s2- 3 �—w - `` ?` 9�s'1' :— 0- J S o . r SENDER: • ..dS SECTION ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. j ` A. Signa�ur ■ Print your name-and address on the reverse ❑Agent you. I so that we can return the card to y ❑Addressee ( ,•y ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, - '�� :calved by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes i . Me ?' 19!5kW ri�eIA14 ' If YES.enter delivery address below: ❑No r 2 zs Z4;,4'h AJ'TaAPIA NY ///0Z 3. i i II I llllfl IIII III I III I I I III I I I I I I IIIlIIIII I I III ❑Ad dulISignature Signature eRestricted D ❑Registice Type I-] email red Map.ss® l 9590 9402 2472 6306 2699 48 rtifieMali® :livery ❑Registered Mail Restrwtedj ett Certified Mall Restricted Delivery :turinrery n Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise =2__Article_Numbe�LTransfer from Service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConflrmationTm ,015 0640 2 0 0 1 5428 2 5 4 6 --� ❑Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation ll ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery a - (Over$500) PS Form 3811,July-2015 PSN 7530-62-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i SENDER: • SECTION, COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverseX 13Agent so that we can return the card to you. cJ ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No � l g C'�NT�,� S'l•; �,��l� � 4 L YAlgeao/l NY /1-3131 I III 111111 IIII III I III I I I III I I I I I I IIIIII II I II III ❑dullSignature :,i❑Registered Mass® , duct Signature Restricted Delivery' ❑Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9402 2472 6306 2699 31 lvrtified Mail® :livery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery R:tum Receipt for } ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmationrm ! 0640 0001 5428 2553 1 ❑Insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation ❑Insured Mad Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form'3811;July'2015iPSN (over7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I #0002199480 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck,in said county,being duly sworn,says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES , a weekly newspaper,published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks(s),successfully commencing on 04/26/2018 ems" Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this dalof 11d CHRISTINA VOLINSI'I NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No 0IVO6105050 Qualified in Suffolk County My CUr1 MISS10A t,rphaa Febnrury 28,2020 TYPESET Wed Apr 18 13 28 00 EDT 2018 setback of 10 feet; 2) more than the code CHAIRPERSON LEGAL NOTICE permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%,lo- BY Kim E.Fuentes SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD cated at 440 South Lane(AdJ to Orient Har- 54375 Main Road(Office Location) OF APPEALS bor),East Marion,NY SCTM#1000-38-6-12 53095 Main Road(Mailing/USPS) THURSDAY,MAY 3,2018 11:00 A.M.-LEFKARA HOLDINGS LLC PO Box 1179 PUBLIC HEARINGS #7158-Request for Variances from Article Southold,NY 11971-0959 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to XXII,Section 280-116A,Article XXIII,Sec- 2199480 Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code tion 280-124, and the Building Inspector's Chapter 280(Zoning),Town of Southold,the January 16,2018,Amended February 5,2018 1 following public hearings will be held by the Notice of Disapproval based on an applica- SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF tion for a building permit to construct addi- APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main tions and alterations to an existing single fam- Road,PO Box 1179, Southold,New York ily dwelling and to construct new accessory 11971-0959,on THURSDAY,MAY 3,2018. structures,I)less than the code required 100 9:30 A.M.-KEVIN FOOTE#7127-(Ad- feet from the top of the bluff,2)more than the Journed from February 1,2018)Request for code permitted maximum lot coverage of Variances from Article III,Section 280-15, 20%,located at 1070 The Strand,(AdJ to the Article XXIII, Section 280-124, and the Long Island Sound) East Marion, NY Building Inspector's October 6,2017 Notice SCTM#1000-30-2-77 of Disapproval based on an application for a 11:15 A.M.-WILLIAM AND LORRAINE building permit for additions and alterations MCINTOSH#7159-Request for a Variance to an existing single family dwelling, con- from Article IV, Section 280-18, and the struction of an accessory garage, and con- Building Inspector's November 30,2017 No- struction of an accessory swimming pool,1) tice of Disapproval based on an application addition, and alterations to a single family for a building permit to construct additions dwelling located less than the code required and alterations to an existing single family minimum front yard setback of 35 feet, 2) dwelling,1)less than the code required mini- proposed accessory garage located in other mum side yard setback of 15 feet,located at than the code required rear yard,3)proposed 395 Holden Avenue Extension,Cutchogue,, accessory swimming pool located in other NY SCTM#1000-103-13-31. than the code required rear yard,located at. 1:00 P.M. - TOU PATERA MOU, LLC, 780 Champlin Place, Greenport, NY NICK MOSHOURIS#7158-Request for a SCTM#1000-34-3-36 1 Variance from Article XXIII, Section 9:45 A.M. -TIMOTHY J.AND NANCY 280-124, and the Building Inspector's De- LEE HILL#7155-Request for a Variance cember 19,2017 Notice of Disapproval based from Article XXIII,Section 280-124 and the on an application for a building permit to Building Inspector's December 14,2017 No- legalize"as built"demolition and to construct tice of Disapproval based on an application additions to a single family dwelling;1)less for a building permit to legalize an"as built" than the code required minimum front yard deck addition and to construct additions and setback of 35 feet, located at 295 Central alterations to an existing single family Drive, Mattituck, NY SCTM411000-106-3- dwelling, 1) more than the code permitted 20 maximum lot coverage of 20%, located at 1:15 P.M. - THOMAS SIMON AND 360 Oak Avenue, Southold, NY JEANNESHANAHAN#7161-Request for SCTM#1000-77-2-2. a Variance from Article III,Section 280-15, 10:00 A.M. - 1505 BIRDSEYE ROAD Article IV,280-19,and the Building Inspec- LLC, 7140 - (Adjourned from March 1, tor's December 4, 2017 Notice of Disap- 2018)Request for Variances from Article IV, proval based on an application for a building Section 280-18, Article XXII, Section permit to construct an in-ground swimming 280-105,Article XXII,Section 280-116;and pool, 1) located in other than the code re- the Building Inspector's November 17 2017, quired rear yard,located at 1375 Greenway Amended November 22,2017 Notice of Dis- East,Orient,NY SCTM#1000-15-1-13 approval based on an application for a 1:30 P.M. - STEPHANIE L. TEICHER building permit to construct anew single fam- #7138-(Adjourned from April 5,2018)Re- ily dwelling and to erect deer fence at a height quest for Variances from Article XXII,Sec- of 8 feet at, 1) proposed single family tion 280-116 A(1), Article XXIiI, Section dwelling located less than the code required 280-124. and the Building Inspector's No- minimum front yard setback of 50 feet; 2) vember 15, 2017, amended November 20, proposed dwelling located less than the code 2017 Notice of Disapproval based on an ap- required 100 feet from the top of the bluff,3) plication for a building permit to legalize"as- proposed deer fence more than the code re- built"additions to an existing single family quired maximum four(4)feet in height when dwelling, at, 1) located less than the code located in the front yard, located at 1505 required 100 feet from the top of the bluff,2) Birdseye Road, (AdJ to the Long Island less than the code required minimum rearyard Sound)Orient,NY SCTM#1000 17-1-4 setback of 50 feet;located at- 6825 Nassau 10:30 A.M. - SARA LAMM AND MAT- Point Road,(AdJ to Little Peconic Bay)Cut- THEW ASELTON#7156-Request for a chogue,NY SCTM#1000 111-15-82 Variance from Article III,Section 280-15 and The Board of Appeals will hear all persons the Building Inspector's December 20,2017 or their representatives,desiring to be heard at Notice of Disapproval based on an applica- each hearing,and/or desiring to submit writ- tion for a building permit to construct an ac- ten statements before the conclusion of each cessory in-ground swimming pool,1)located hearing Each hearing will in other than the code required rear yard, not start earlier than designated above Files located at 1045 Orchard Street,Orient,NY are available for review during regular busi- SCTM#1000-25-2-20 22 ness hours and 10:45 A.M.-PETER PATINELLA#7157- prior to the day of the hearing If you have Request for Variances from Article XXIII, questions,please contact our office at,(63 1) Section 280-124 and the Building Inspector's 765-1809, or by email: KimF@ January 15,2018 Notice of Disapproval based southoldtownny.gov on an application for a building permit to Dated.April 19,2018 construct additions and alterations to an exist- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ing single family dwelling, 1) located less LESLIE K A N E S W E I S M A N, than the code required minimum side yard BOARD MEMBERS - Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �O��O� S�UryOlO 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer �� �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �yCOUNTY Southold,NY 11971 http://s6utholdtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 January 25, 2018 Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District Attn: Corey Humphrey 423 Griffing Ave., Suite 110 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: ZBA # 7158 LEFKARA HOLDINGS, LLC 1000-30-2-77 Dear Sir or Madam: We have received an application for a project adjacent to a waterway, shown on the enclosed site map. The hearing on this application is expected to be held in approximately 3 weeks. Enclosed is a copy of the site map, together with the application and a copy of the area map. May we ask for your assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By: �� Encls. BOARD MEMBERS SO Ur Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��� yQl 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora [ Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer i� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l''COum Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �l Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 January 25, 2018 D E C E � u�p E JAN % 6 2018 Mark Terry, Principal Planner sl aannringingthold BoBoaarr Pld LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. # 7158 LEFKARA HOLDINGS, LLC Dear Mark: We have received an application for additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and new accessory structures. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chai on By: BOARD MEMBERS OF soar _ Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� yQ! 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 h O Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer a� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l�cou � Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 January 25, 2018 Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Ms. Lansdale : Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File # 7158 Owner/Applicant : LEFKARA HOLDINGS, LLC Action Requested: Construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling and new accessory structures. Within 500 feet of: ( ) State or County Road (X) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. ( ) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson By: Encls. OFFICE LOCATION: 0� SOU MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �� jjfiD P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Road Route 25 ,`O l0 Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY T y� Telephone: 631765-1809 • COQ http://southoldtowuny.gov COU ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold /1l June 11, 2018 Michael Kimack P.O. Box 1047 Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA Appeal No. 7158 Lefkara Holdings LLC, 1070 The Strand,East Marion SCTM No. 1000-30-2-77 Dear Mr. Kimack; Enclosed is a copy of the.Zoning Board's June 7, 2018 determination filed today with the Town Clerk regarding your application. Sincer y, Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Department 91 90 69 92 o DA S T aa' 88 93 v Q Pn (13MAr 87 a 94y,s J= •�'A) ar 85 m 95 ppp 5� OSI.)`` 66 s 2c(0� a ` � 9P 'e Ine) � ® - D nam 81 7 t ®� - �� Ina, 78 83 ua _ 74 p 80 ,g = 73 O 75 o Iml q. 65 " r mn ms1 � s, {87 '� t+ 101 ® ^ -6U 324A30 i- - IL'J0d(. je �'b ingl Q �b 5856 59 ` o `b 1113) '41 I PO� 8 (OPEN SPACE) 57 e ®�W ,$ 54 ,P 50 T° �• 8 52 = �b48 T° t� 46 T° tan O noel'� 49 44 T° `y� / P � noe) � a7 CSF T° reef,° CRESCry '� Don •P 45 t�j�'� 41 i Doo) $ 43 '9 1 33 32 31 � (,o3, 9 42 �1pPc 34 m 30 P35 a w) mf rn> d 29 3, 10. w) . 39 �s w) ta+) s � VS 4° 28 102�a / c w) 38 J g� '� s (o 37 27 4 . non 4 cm -ID' 26 36 25 iso a 24 w) 23 O• ro / �Lr N 10,13 'C ° / � •lam) a /j FOR PCL NO • SEE SEC NO FOR PCL NO 035-02-011 , / FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO SEE SEC NO / SEE SEC NOSEE SEC 035-02-017 1 035-01-025 038-02-0011 MATCH r I Sbck LhM SrJrwl ppM W,e ——3011—— ��,DeaW We ——H—— UNIE53 pVAYe,OIMERYASE,ALLPROPERnES E— (21) FTvnwwLM --F-- RYwepnre,Lm° --R-- MEWIniINTHEFY%LQMNOpa1RIC15 NOTICE COUNTY Oz 210 aRNER WAD � Real Propert ellr O¢W Lm — — HWm®I Omleel Lme--t6T— RE 26.31 K,DRANT— Fl �NTENANERATION,SALEOR e —A— qpf " 41 49 DISTRIBUTIONNGFAFANY PORTION OF THE pj m° tumry LM -- UyuOmM ltn --L-- AmauW®GMCnne--A-- ucNr SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP IS PROHIBITED County Center PMN fi5 REFLSE .,a' Sc A(tl)ar t21A T�'"`1aO --- PeIXgmra Ltrm --R-- Yrwwemroinna w"--YAY-- NAeuIANc£ WoslENrnER IMTHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE .��,� 2tp 0 121 A(c) REAL PROPERTYrM SERVICE AGENCY 1 'v, _ ,�.. 1 ..m3,»;anp.i'""" w=G��.µ..,�^a '+ •. •�.�>. 'tp'n3:,; ..�: :5K. .� � �,+'-- ,�',s'.'_�a'- .n.i .,a. a' "x;i a .;_ P +!=.�:v. f'L:;,7. ,'r.`'i.`;t'^ ;'�::!f-: �-e.°'x,. oa fl.;." { ,. .}, ,,A,"S�i....-= �,w�m:'�,�'S�,;,r. 'M is. ...any,.• . t'>; :`a: 'd'1;. :;;:' .. �.t:` ,., ��$'.'..-' ..x; �zy1.""' .,�°.": '�'^ !��Lz "; ' .:z ..z"� '�w� r. <,.,.1.,•�4 a I;; ':�". '��, ��,a..�1.0.�, «.ell ;; ::.s., .ta. .i":•.:�;"°.y. ',i, `a,.'e '-'� nW;�'^,.�„ G:. - a