Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-3.-3-3.5
OFFICE LOCATION: �O�*Of SU(/Ty010 MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) N �r S • �pQ Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 Fax: 631 765-3136 Comm LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Domino, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date: March 20, 2017 Re: Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coastal Consistency Review ISLAND HOLDING LLC, c/o DAVID LONG SCTM# 1000=3 3 There was an error in the March 14, 2016 LWRP CCR. The action was recommended as Consistent although it was proposed in the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA) which does not permit open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of greater than 200 square feet or are not removed in the fall of each year. The Board issued a Chapter 111 permit number 8799C in 2016. Based on the issuance of this permit, the new action is recommended as Consistent with two concerns noted below. Docko, Inc. on behalf of ISLAND HOLDING LLC, c/o DAVID LONG requests an Amendment to Wetland Permit#8799 and Coastal Erosion Permit#8799C to modify the proposed dock to consist of a 4' wide by 85 linear foot long post/pile fixed wood pier with handrails on both sides, of which ±53 linear feet is water ward of the apparent high tide line; install a 3' wide by 30' long seasonal hinged ramp; install an 8'x20' seasonal floating dock with associated restraint piles, and three additional tie-off piles for a total of five (5) tie-off piles; the T wide pile supported ships ladder and associated ladders at seaward end will not be installed. Located: 1982 Brooks Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1000-3-3-3.5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is CONSISTENT with the below listed Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with LWRP provided the Board. 1. Confirm that the proposed square footage of the newly proposed structure is less than 200' or the float is removed from the waterbody each year. It is unclear if the action meets Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS as an unregulated activity. I 2. Assesses the potential impact to the eeldrass beds to the north of the proposed structure. The tie off piling is close The draft of the proposed vessel is unknown. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM E �G A. INSTRUCTIONS MAR 1 5 2011 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall comple "tfii§ -,,- CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southo -- Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non-supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000—03-3-3.5 PROJECT NAME: Dock Modifications-New Floating Dock The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: Install an 8-FT x 20-FT float with associated restraint piles, hingedp and three additional tie-off riles at a previously authorized pier under construction, seaward of the apparent High Water Line. .See Nf_ r 1"Of-e 1 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Docko Office <Office@docko.com> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:37 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: RE: David Long Good morning Elizabeth, Yes,the proposed fixed dock will be a total of 85 feet in length. Also,will the Franklin project be on the March meeting agenda? Thank you, Cindy From:Cantrell, Elizabeth [mailto:elizabethc@town.southold.ny.usl Sent:Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:16 AM To: Docko Office<Office@docko.com> Subject: RE: David Long Hi Cindy, Can you please confirm that under this amendment,the proposed fixed dock will be a total of 85 feet in length. In other words,the permit was issued for a 95 linear foot fixed dock,this amendment will cut it back 10 feet to support a ramp to the float. "Please advise asap as I am trying to get your noticing paperwork out by 11:00am in the morning mail to ensure it go out today to you. From: Docko Office [mailto:Office(o)docko.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:39 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: David Long Good afternoon Elizabeth, The project description for the Long dock modification has been revised to show the shortened dock and the seasonal use of the ramp and float: Install a seasonal 8-FT x 20-FT float and a seasonal hinged ramp with associated restraint piles and three additional tie-off piles at a previously authorized shortened pier under construction, now to be 53(+/-)LF seaward of the Apparent High Water Line. I have also attached a revised set of signed and sealed drawings for your file. Please give the office a call should you need any additional information in order to process the requested permit. Best Regards, Cindy 1 Cindy Bayreuther Docko, Inc. 14 Holmes Street P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 Tel: (860)-572-8939 Fax: (860)-572-7569 office@docko.com 2 Location of action: 1982 Brooks Point Road(Brooks Point) Fishers Island,NY 06390 Site acreage: 6.7 Acres Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Island Holdings LLC C/o David Long b) Mailing Address: 2931 Brunswick Pike Lawrenceville,NJ 08648 c) Telephone number: Area Code(908) 625-9600 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No If yes,which state or federal Agency?US ACOE,NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This dock construction makes appropriate and beneficial use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental design factors published by the NYSDEC and the DOS Coastal Management Program South Local law No 6 2004 and Southold LWRP The previously authorized pier will be built to a 6-FT deck height or more over the rocky shore sediments until passing the apparent Mean Low Water line The float will be added to the end of the pier. There will be no impairment of water flow, navigation or public access and no impact on the vista This site is substantially not visible from any other property on Fishers Island. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes No X Not Applicable The only portion of the proposed work visible to any extent will be the wood timber and pile supported pier and new float visible from the water. The land side visual access affected by this protect is at the applicant's site in this small recess in the shoreline which is high terrain lined by trees. The facilities will be more visible through the leafless trees in fall winter, and in early spring but not from the road. The dock site will be visible from the water only when passing the site by boat. A dock facility for private recreational boating off residential property in an"adjacent area"is a compatible use. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This proposed dock construction will take place on Brooks Point and is acknowledged to be in a flood- prone zone area; there is wave exposure at this site The new pier is to be built to accommodate complete submersion and resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic uplift pressures due to flooding and tlpical waves The floating dock and hinged ramp subject of this application will be seasonally installed and removed and in advance of coastal storms. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This project is a marine waterfront facility in tidal waters and will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This site is a very active and relatively high energy wave zone and as a result there is little shoreline vegetation in amongst the boulders A dock facility is consistent with this policy because it is situated 3 clear of the existing eel grass beds and it proposes the elevation of the pier to be at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments beneath which tidal wetlands vegetation or even submerged aquatic vegetation may spread The NYSDEC prepared a study showing that pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber product construction materials are suitable for this We of project in this location, except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite or plastic) materials. The configuration shown on the drawings provides an optimum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving the coastal vegetation resources the opportunity to spread. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project. No emissions will be generated by the dock facili1y. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. The pressure-treated wood trimmings from the dock construction will be collected and disposed of in accordance with current regulations so as to minimize any harmful affect. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable The authorized pier is to be built emanating from private land. The new float will be added to the end of the pier. The Public Trust Lands and Waters constitutes the area between the Mean High Water line and Mean Low Water line and the resources are from the High Tide line, out. These environmental resources are minimal at this site Site habitat features are being preserved so the potential for growth is being protected by the suitable alignment and height standards dictated by the NYS DEC. There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the construction of the pier and dock facility all waterward above the apparent High Water line are not likely to influence or change this fact. The Public Trust Lands at this site are steepp and rock covered with no practical point of access or passage. 4 WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This project is to install a new floating dock off the end of an already authorized new vier for water- dependent recreational boating This usage is defined as water-dependent in the LWRP. The dock facility will provide for recreational boating and provide boat transportation access to the Island or mainland The pier will provide access without adverse environmental impacts and while protecting existing habitat and limited resources The float and berthing area is configured to stop short of documented eel grass beds. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for commercial fishing or shellfish industries or enterprises. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or aquaculture industries or enterprises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations. PREPARED BY Keith B.Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. TITLE AgentDATE February 14, 2017 5 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project Any answers may be continued on separate-sheets) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. The proposed project is to install an 8-FT x 20-FT float with associated restraint piles, hinged ramp and three additional tie-off piles at a previously authorized pier under construction seaward of the apparent High Water Line. The is new project will provide for safer all tide access at a private dock used for recreational boating. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). West-Christopher and Rosalind Roosevelt, 88 Elys Ferry Road, Lyme, CT 06371and Andrew and Ashley Burr, 15 Hemlock Hill Road, New Canaan, CT 06840 to the East-Angelica G Dearborn and Sheldon G Withers, 80 Turtleback Lane, New Canaan, CT 06840 and James WB and Margaret W Benkhard APRT, 1192 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10128 (Please note that depending upon the nature and extent of your project, you may be requested to provide the names and addresses of additional property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordination.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. 4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement, or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. None near by. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy (i.e-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). Alternatives considered included wider, higher, lower, shorter and longer piers, fixed pier versus floating docks, boat lifts, utilities, different locations on the site, use of open grate decking, orientation of docking facilities and the like, all of which are discussed in the narrative. The proposed configuration provides for optimal berthing, minimal environmental disturbances and no adverse impact to navigation or public trust access to or use of the stretch of shoreline. DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There is no dredging associated with this project. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material (except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the dewatering and disposal sites as applicable so as to provide a clear indication of existing conditions. For ten-year maintenance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. 4. Describe the method of dredging(i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged(i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatering/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also, indicate if there would be any barge overflow. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. 1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, non- commercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). The float will be 8-FT wide and 20-FT long complying with these provisions. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length, beam and draft) of vessel(s) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vesse/(s) if known. A typical vessel is shown of the plan view of the application drawings. The boat will probably be a motor boat 35 feet or so in length. 3. For commercial mooring sites, such as marinas, indicate the capacity of the facility and indicate on the plan view the location(s) of any proposed fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, please discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. Not applicable-There are no pump out facilities proposed and no fueling facilities at this site. Those functions are taken care of elsewhere on Fishers Island provided by commercial pumpout operator from the mainland, however, any boat using their facility could and would use the pump out facilities at local marinas where fuel is sold. 4. Indicate on your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such structures. 4. Discuss the need for wave protection at the proposed facility. Please be advised that if a permit is issued, you would be required to recognize that the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified._Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. There is no good (affordable) structural option or opportunity for wave protection at this site. Waves from the wave field northwesterly to northeasterly of the site are unobstructed in their approach which is why the shoreline consists of boulders, the only natural material and formation the waves cannot move. This floating dock will, thus, be installed seasonally in May and removed by the end of September, or in advance of a coastal storm. BULKHEAD/NG/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project includes construction of bulkheading (also - retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters/wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. The shoreline will remain stabilized by existing boulders landward of the spring high tide line. There is not proposal to place fill in waters of the United States. 2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. No material is to be placed. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement (i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. The foregoing requests basic information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of the Army permits. It is intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. ISLAND HOLDINGS,LLC. BROOKS POINT,ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND,NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATIONS FEBRUARY 2017 GENERAL Mr. David Long is the applicant, owns parcel 1000-003-3-3.5 off Brooks Point Road located along the south shoreline of Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and trees with a steep 20-foot bluff falling off to the shoreline which is lined with large stone. This is a high-energy waterfront site. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along Fishers Island Sound at the easterly end, abutted by Christopher and Rosalind Roosevelt and Andrew and Ashley Burr to the west and Angelica G. Dearborn and Sheldon G. Withers and James W. B. and Margaret W. Benkhard to the east. The waterfront consists of a rock-covered slope with sporadic individual tidal wetlands vegetation, seaside goldenrod in amongst the stones on the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the proposed dock site. The dock has been laid out clear of that vegetation. It is Mr. Long's desire to construct the fixed pier dock system authorized in permits issued by the DEC, ACOE, and Town of Southold. These permits are NYS DEC Permit No. 1-4738-04452/00001 issued on July 21, 2016, ACOE Permit No. NAN-2016-00345-ETA issued June 15, 2016 and TOS Permits 8799 and 8799C issued on May 18, 2016. Mr. Long wishes to modify the existing permits to allow for the installation of a floating dock off the south end of the main pier. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. A waiver to the pile size specified therein is requested in deference to the wave exposure at this site and the difficult driving conditions that being hard packed gravel with embedded stone and boulders. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to modify a fixed wood pile and timber pier emanating from the shore out into Fishers Island Sound to include a floating dock in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this floating dock will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology, incorporating the installation into the construction of the pier. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats with the float and ramp on the deck of the barge. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the new ramp landing on the south side of the pier and proceeding westward with the new float end limited to the seaward end of the pier. ➢ These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity of approximately 20 tons and pull-out resistance of approximately 10 tons. This generally results in about 10 to 15 feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind 1 westerly wave field, these piles will be 12-inch nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA type 3. ➢ After the landing support piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, five runs of stringers will be set to accommodate the decking and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against any uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers,have been connected to the piles and split caps,the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather open grate or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the textured side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray,brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a '/4"gap between deck planks. ➢ The hinged ramp landing decking will run level at a height of six feet above Mean Low Water and well above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow sub-tidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surfaces and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar,oak,hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ The hinged ramp which will be of wood or aluminum, and the float, will be built offsite and delivered on the barge with the float. ➢ The float will be set in position and restraint piles driven through the pile hoops located at each corner. A ramp hoist will be installed between the two shore-side restraint piles. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The site is in Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock modification is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The authorized pier is to be built of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site. This proposal is consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The float encroachment has been minimised to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies. The facility as a whole is as low profile as possible consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the tidal range of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and lights will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact. 2 NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5—Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 — Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The modified recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Board of Trustees offered during the workshop presentation. The new float has been situated clear of submerged aquatic vegetation in the nearshore sub-tidal waters. As such, the dock provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in Fishers Island Sound. This new floating dock facility supplements the configuration of the structure approved in the permits referenced above. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project modifies a recreational boating facility for the property staying basically within the authorized footprint of the pier and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water-dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13—Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed project has been laid out to make the most beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate, historic point of the land where access down the bank will not require excessive structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. In summary, the dock is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The dock modification is limited to the addition of a floating dock which has been minimized in size,height, and orientation so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions, and avoiding the nearby eel grass beds. 3 This project does not interfere with public access or use of Public Trust Waters and Lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility has been located in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already been diminished so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The location of the float has been specifically addressed so as to allow vegetation of the shoreline by tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility has also been located reaching out to water of adequate depth in Fishers Island Sound so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12- inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law #6, decking for the pier and the ramp treads will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is considered to be providing recreational boating and water usage opportunity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The floating dock is the optimum size for stability considerations especially acknowledging the wave field from the west to northwest in Fishers Island Sound/and the floating dock is angled into those waves. REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks,the following additional information is offered. 4 1. Permit modifications for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE,NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type 3 pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine(SYP) 12-inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure- treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with at least one 1 inch bolt per connection, and in many cases, two % inch bolts per connection. The float will also be built of SYP materials except the deck which will be Ipe. The modified dock facility does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline and the ramp landing elevation is such that in high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. The float will be removed seasonally in September and not launched until May each year to avoid or at least minimize harsh exposures. 3. The pier support will include driving new 12-inch diameter piles at the floating dock comers to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired alignment and support intervals. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The new float will be decked with Ipe, not CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine, in accordance with Town laws/ordinances. This provides a safe walking surface for access to the berthed boat. 5. The dock facility is still located near the center of the property line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the Sound. 6. Upon receipt of the permits for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are to be no permanent structures located above the pier or float decking, nor are any planned to be other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. The authorized pier design provides a five-foot passage way beneath and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent High Water Line which will be unaffected by this modification. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. 5 Policy 2 —Water Dependent Uses — This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 — Use of Existing Developed Shorefront — There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers along the crest with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation interspersed in the stone. The authorized project will build the pier to a logical shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. This project merely modifies the boat access point at the end of the pier head where the float is proposed to be installed. Policy 7— Significant Fish &Wildlife Habitat—Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs four feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically, there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier and the new slip terminate clear of the mapped eel grass bed that follows the deeper contours to the north. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat — Protection and preservation of habitat has been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier is located over a stony part of the shore to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources and the float stops short of the mapped eel grass bed. Policy 1 I — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has already been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The floating dock facility has been situated where stone on the subtidal sediments already precludes safe boat berthing and the length reduced to the minimum practical length stopping short of the areas of documented submerged aquatic vegetation. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding= This project consists of the modification of the authorized wood pile and timber pier head to now be a floating dock which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of greater than 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached and the berthing facility is clear of shallow boulders. The waters are unprotected and so boats must be berthed stem to the east leaving the motor in the deep enough water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access—Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the Public Trust Lands or Waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing which are rare because of the open water exposure. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any opportunity or enticement for public access in the area. The pier does not reach the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies and boating this close to shore is rare because of the submerged obstructions. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. 6 Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 — Water Dependent Recreation — This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24—Scenic Resources, Impairment or Loss-This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the new float attached to the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality= The modified dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the tidal wetlands vegetation exists sporadically in patches along the shorefront. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier has taken advantage of a typical un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the deposit of stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the fringe vegetation naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation, but to date that has not occurred in the proposed pier site. The new float will not adversely affect the tidal wetlands vegetation on site or nearby or the existing bed of eel grass. SUMMARY This project is for dock modification for recreational boating access at property of the Long family on Fishers Island. A copy of the existing US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold permits are attached as substantiation for this project. Permit modifications for all permits have been initiated. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS/DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6,2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOC O, INC. Keith B.Neilson,P.E. 7 'l s N W .. ' r FISHERS ISLAND SOUND SITE 0 .. u Vis+, •._y ^ I r n` ..-�e- �-- N/F PROPERTY n yip;-O nb•' • � O E � '� � �~ � �, `��• FISHEFZS 1r�—L.AIVD SOUfVD LOG.o.T101V l"'If�.P ROOSEVELT OF PROJECT:NEW CKART:13Z4 RAMP and FLOAT GRAPHC SCALE 1000 500 O 1000 1(ARDS .,� ^; •r - �rr .i {• • -.�<c--.•. ,.� ' �. N/F PROPERTY OF v .y DEARBORN NOTE-15. -,�:.�;•• ••>~: SITE , 1, ELEVATION DATUM 15 APPARENT LOW WATERKu �+ 21DE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 20T7 NOAH TIDE GF TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL COVE-NEW ~• cf 54 .`.' ;1t-:'= LONG 'may LONDON. 4s.. "• - .. 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~' _ +; ,•r. } `: INSTALL A SEASONAL 8-FT X 20 FT FLOAT AND A HINGED RAMP WITH ASSOCIATFSJ RESTRAINT :•;r,±��..• �r^+.;.^'•V• ;-�••' PILES AND THREE ADDITIONAL TIE-OFF PI "h" ='=4 �.>; .: �' •� ,.;- LES AT :yi',:�z?C :4:'., -' •;,.a�i; ;,�:;:'c;:.,<H,_�.;:K:y%y:f •.7.. itis__. IO PREVIOUSLYAUTIR1ZEp, '" ' =JJ : •.'i,. ):..•`'i.+f'� _:S1rY� V='t t�-'-�.• 4.a•_ SHORTENED PER UNDER "-.a;_;,t Y :�,.,,• ).;�... l_•_:','3,.!'Yi�/.,..,_ .,,i., "t. �`:.-S•.',:,�, _tib-:7:5 .=�i'.v: vt'�.-.'.�:^.:,:._\•.�iY. CONSTRUCTION, NOW TO BE 5�3:&F SEAWARD OF THE i APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE '�..,• d.PROJECT PURPOSE: _;'_ ��v '.<< `F=ISHERS ISL�A/VD:._:,•_ _�•. TO PROvtDE FOR SSR ALL TIDE - \ r ;•7: :::} � ACGESSATA EW YOFZIG PRIVATE DOCK USED FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. ''•.;- � _-..:•,e^� :1.` ' .. :�', . •,- r' / .__:r.,.r. ,'1�.. „ :Y•_. Y+'i_'�T.i _. .h'�:!~ 117 .'ti's' 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A F1RlAT10N OF SURVEYS FOR PERMIT -ti,: -, a- ":� .'-Y: ,. ..w:�,-� '•• THEY ARE �:r.. ;.�;:-; rj- L;.-• - .— PIES EY NOT GONSTRUG7)ON GONTRACT DOCUMENTS.AT _ :.:_=: :. _. 51. . OWN BUILDING - .... --_... _.., _._.. �. �j:: - PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: GRAPt6 ScA t•`500' WEST. EAST: soo - I 500 CHRISTOPHER and ANGEUGA DEARBORN R•OSALJND ROOSEVELT and SHEL.DON WITHERS 88 ELY-5 FERRY RD 60 TURTLEBACK LANE LYME,CT 06371 NEW C A ASN,Cr 06840 PROJECT: DOCK MODIFICATIONS REVISED 3-7-Ti T.0.5. LOCATION: RSHERS ISLAND,TOWN OF 5OLlTHOLD PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY- FISHERS 15LAND SOUND DATE: AUGUST-9,2016 + 0 C K 0 r ' 47in (� (� /J APPLICANT LELAND HOLDINGS LLG II �d AG-ESOT SHEET l OF 4 DOGKO, INC. ��jR zn Z _ Kef".B.Nelson,PE ORP 0 ,9 MAR 9 2017 �*k,CT 06355 660 572 8939 FAX 8W 5'2 i�c9 pV„•G 02 03-1334 �1L cl-ir @dcci;o.ccm Iawn i:r^.3 \._+a:' ^tCw•... _ .iG:_ ..=1 CM, Ll;:ypG+..'__:'Go: :a fcG::ars;2.0.+,7 o Trus wJl oot� e F'so VELI-gr— CO 9MO 695E?LS o9(d )cd� 6IE68�s O3 �I ssscooio*��1 LIOZ 6 - �dW �;yt nj:&.'; a � dQ r. -. \�. 3d uosCaN F t}tay ! i.::..ta/C-• l \; --n SONC" CINV 61 -LNv-Dnddd � ;! �•j � X O 4 94'JL'615n9rrd 3140 S trii ONnos owla.s213NSL xao�M3N'/uNnOD x1O-t�3ns `t%�N 0101 MOS 30 NM01.'ONd%l S2!GHSI3 N011-d0O-1 SNOLl`d�1�100W>r�OQ 1 ��3rorJd d^'\A\01 J.Ngdv'dd'd NO CGGVU 32nd SNOUVA313 /^\ OTi 9NV.3i�?Jn5 aMd"I Oa2bN2!'38�WIyr-Aq 9N[15DC3 aNOd Ob O OL Ov Or=.l 3-N'-)S 7ek"O 7 t Nmdn d0 NMd 1 d0 39Q3 1 i (tel GlU` s 1 "Yl do asU� Hsnae , � lVCrL4PuOd1 C7-050dO2fd JO 1Nt?1d SSd2i9 733 30 3903x' S -f33 \� R 7J � e uMo 41 noS �7�i.:.tOL, - .?.'t.ri�C.;j:erM•.;'£wnr.. wo�•ox�a^r��`lit�L13 t 90- 0 GM 695:c'_C 099 W__j 6E69 JL5 099 LIOZ 6 - ON yo�ssa�oH 55E90 10`WAW y y`a o d 2r o 3d•uosRN'e 4*Fa i ZF98sU V 30 6 193HS 1N39d U y OM 59NIMOH ONv-ISI TNN Drlddd y 0 $ 0 0 a • 9LOZ'615r)o(w 3140 ln0?TD 2i31d ONr 105 ONV-S15?l3H Lt -,QVA12f3LHM •SWO e--Id'dWvld Pic 1do-b-roNOSv3s ��"�N � C MOf- n d0 N NO1'ONVISI SnHSW :NOLLV= '901 Ll-L-E 09GAMi SNOIlb'�I�IUOW>OOa '1L3romd oz o a oz cc i 3-Tvw �s�evao eglVA\MO'I NVSW NO C73S`o43 3W SNOLLVA-=nB -- - 7)M 9NV_a/lZins ON i OO2fdNZi39 Wr Aq _ _ _ �` /�l\tel/\ N`d"7ci �.�``J,3rWr1�-- -- -- -- '', •moo � '} ,'', `, i lel 13 71330 91"Hilts 9Nuwi caLsoLidrisisod �J `-�= :��'`.`y r'�_ __�,..��' 1 •.� - j� . � Q3L11LJ2i3d J.l!3fk7V\3yd , ^� r1 O �•�'' �-_,-- ��.� l � WE�IAN•N- ti -' '�O02iN3CT'K 91W HIM t9d 3CAM J.3'7'Qp311JI.TzW.l'Y�f bV�d``�� -� ' �0 ----------------- ---- clr,jnos- '{� _��- I'll-•! ' fir-' `(dlJJ 311d faders O3Tid1SNI 3E O11ON ;� Ys�' /dCr_zOrb3aK�Mlr1l�SN�i�`ds9nNQOv�U0r3dS CRMOH1nd),lSG� ?� oo-tm•id p�/�✓%�,`,'`;`,lU;'`' �J,�l��r`�j� '(i . EZ=MHW O7vi SdIHS cain)6dns 3-0 s Al— Z'_ � r --- 6 dw.J Q90N1H Y�' ,L•' - _ J.d•OEXL-r-S-EMSN� �`.�_ _�^ '�- i 1d07d C1aNIt153r1 -- - A 0;. old`1bNOSb'9 \ -�L2-OZ X 19 S M9:'V 55`dt�J 133 l �(V SNS aa's)M31n C2N9 - 3O I f, 1 N07E•THE SEASONAL FLANGED RAmp AND CENTER TIE-LFF PIE ARE NOT ;! --NEW TIE-OFF PLL TOP EL rAFT(7YP) SHOWN 4N T FNS VEW FOR GL?R If' OF PER CO'PG NENTS I I i s FREVCUSLY PERMri TED li I.. (T.CS.PERMITS e?99 cnd A-FT WIDE PLE SUPPORTED P Z li II AHWL 3.4 ti II APPROXI"LATE BOTTOM i I NEWB-F7X�G-hT5G450NALFi.0,4T GWOUR AT END OF PER G Er-t GRASS I` 1',:i::4y�f:J{'ri.:. r: .....r'4'7 Y. sGi7.`374::`'G't: :•rSY .-?=% It11 � t :1 '�al"a<R's ;`t.^(�-'1'7 •'i;+ '}' �,Ti�rY l:'.i.:' iz::�.:-i: �Y;i:.r; .t..t' - r.....-r.:. '%:rrJ;riw "j' ;:�.i-'�;,..'�"'' ' r;.••.y.�r;Lv":•'4Et"•'.-!:i7;1•' .r;.rr••M:� �.K....,1r;�. .r.y:;; . r<� �!•.r��'/'ir•�•�'t4�' :xS-�'. r.�:; ;APPROX�MA��'..-:�: yi 'T.+ac. '�.li;r.r,!1cr, }'�r�.�r. .I;��v<+t�'::c r.: r•t: "i'.�`.7�`}`r:" 'i"=c:fTs: .:i•••:.,;.<.>> :S .� :- TE,BOTTOh1'.:;r,:, ti. )�� t ,.c:•^•'.- .11...< t• t t'v"• t-i, i t,-u'�_.i.`• n �7Jti y�<y`S. h f rt ,JJ:-�:1 �•t:����v''' .�{�+'Gl.• J'j ': i)}l i� '''•'!C y i ] -�•.}�� 'it`~�•i:AY _t�t?tY {'k.:"��j1�• rr. CONTOUR AT END A 4•yr r=' t.. �:1�''�.T .)n '�i.y,. _�:'j�'-�-^r3c OF FLOAT ir.•'•a;,. Y�. {�.�• >�c>. :: yC+':Ir"- 1� '`-,X3. U-� r ?�i.R . 4 y C•i.f�r:irj ti.:•. •:ii::•,.•.'I r. .R:y );� 7�jC.':• .aL ) `'� ..7� % •%_vra --•'ice,.sy, r' ;s;, rr � Z'ri Z• a `Y` -!i` {�,tii 1',,. �•i i �t� !) )''f_�� t " J �.9,'•. '>t:?t.i,+, YL,.11t l-;x,;jar.y,q.•+�" .��h ��. :J.:. '.'4, f'_'' ••+:� `.� ;?�.'it •�.`..i:ct, -:!`.'. z ,•Y': i:. j;:i�'.��%,., �. �r"'.i :%yt o- 1p; ��::i S s• ,' { `7,.� ;r.r•ey ,�<' r. '{r:)� '• '',.. G �j�/.r:�i. t. .<.v:i,; „ iy.)a:r• ± �• <.; �r7�f' .:fi v r;.�:� <.�L'•,i•�; Y. ^2:f�ql�,t.,{': ;4 i-t •.r.v^�re�.^i': •J'ni'- .•�• .�,;::-^• S' r: ) �•;...,f.�}',,1. _ •.'*t; •r .l ''.71t,;.' i1 't+x'•: �:r....::~. .t,; ':L r�s,•��( .L .Ls? f �• >' liq�l 2'1 �.�ir'.''� rtj-'.r; 1' .c4 '�•a�:.;� r7y.�;!.i.. r:Itti...�� i�T; rl:•'��4L�t!�'..jC. !�j_•�.�Yi'tS./f'r r��t = 1.)!i��:l':y1/,•���:.i..�j...l•�;}:rr 7.�Fr +i NF�'1�{ Y� � �Tl� Yt' I.Y. .� 5 r r> .>t, �,. .. .)fir. - {= J'+�^ M• r'F h �•.' L�'r'J.•�' <�.::i2.•�Y f.4<,Y,Y�i?.i•�...k-ax'��r•, 'r••:tv�o;. i� 5�'e•''y'<' 1, Gr�� 141 i 'nr•,e:F•%F-y + ,�;'w)j�. '�• `:4�L?+:-<;. ;5�¢��.:.3:ft.+,4tf7s•!:r..:ii-e'.5.:rs::."aj.cf�:-�;' :t�•..•;" 1�.-:i�e •cr•• ,,;• s�f•J':�r��� GRAPHic SCALE V.s 10' 10 5 0 10 NEW SFASONAL.35-PTX 30-FT HINGED RAMP NEW TIE-OFF ALEX)L.tFT toy r OF PREVIOUSLY NEW FLOAT RESTRAINT TOP EL 77rFT(TYP (T-05.PERMITS 8799 and 679-0Q ------� E TOP EL 17sFT MV) PER NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED , 1 _ M 3. MFW 23- — <_ i Tf�' — — — ALWL 0.0- — ,' •,,,yx ,;iNr�•.,_•��.:;.J � :..,.,.•,l , NEW 8-FT X 20-F7 SINAL FLOAT ��.J�BOTTOhtSF�IMENTS:..��. ��-''�`'!ri'�.,�S,, ',.�' • g _j )y i�'S i PR�IOUSLY FF3Zt 6flED 3 FT:� '-j v: �;Y r• u. 2 ROCKS,GRAVEL t .;i i 1;,t11�� R xi. T3` '�y:fi�.� t:1'•.t�)....rtf<y::.'y%l•. Yi:Sr•+•� ilaT' �.1:._L �Y ti< n•3:;.. 'r'�`� ,,t^,:i V,/VE PILE SUPPORTED SMPS T}"L s . .•iCi >4:i�r i:... tis;ttr •. LADDER NOT TO BE. :s>y N G1�O�1 L� GRAP•CG SCALE V.20' ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MEAN LOW WATER 20 10 0 20 PROJECT. DOCK f—IODIFCAT70NS N E REVISED 9-7-T7 T.0-S. LOCA T ION: FISHERS LSLAND,TO�VN OF SOL THOLD SEASONAL RAMP cnd F•1)AT$ SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK PIER CALL-OUTS WATERWAY. FISHERS IS._AND SOUND � DATE AUGUST 9.2016 0 C K0 {� APPL CANT ISLAND HOLDINGS LLC 2 ti � i E C E 11 W�0 AGENT SHEET d OF 4 _ _ , `� • 1. i} � DOCKO, INC. Keien B.Nellsor> PE c O R P O R A'S ARo> �;o,�t MAR — 9 2011 ''" c,X06355 ESJ DWG r2-G6-133d• ' 360 572 8939 =AX 866 572 7569 EMAIL ar'fce@docko.c= 3.vain Gcclo:rc. 3-,, %ir, I f Ar..a'1�I *;Yf^!r� -, r 0 y+*�, _ s�yrs w All �s r ,mow 1 i r Y � yam.{ ♦ � � yam. ��. 'M _LAVI: s- Amw - - _•,�J:i,:•-c_:. _ = - .j4f�'�.�1:!�f;`ti�. _X _ ,^r_� _ _ � -h�� _ - °t'� s�`=i�i•-v.�"s r:'_:-'_ '���,..�, [ .� .-^,•�•i .f :r �-^. 2 .'lir�: -'� _ �" '.•s. ;�.rv. r...A„ �;�yv 'XJ '"-fP-,� 7 `,.�.'4'Yt�-:',::" .r5-�...,�_ ';��":.' '"}amu..`:.'fSi'rr."�'y;_-� • . SOUND %�t% 3. . 11 as e' I t.4A(c) IS✓"'_ °1 NF1 t za, ml ' O A5NER5 aeA (o ' m e2 asA asA ,r CD4 s+ O� ry a al ���.1� ./�._:. '� •too 32 a.1 cl ( °u ].a xavq O -. aA tt2 J ]a . p w s �.. zeNU tat u� zw °. 2.0 ' z3NU f I P�'ArE r +iMq veAlq O1 ' e � I _ ° +>sAlq -ry1 e � I j 22 23A ;'IA4"(C) f + 7.+A T �C 2 3 +tom FOR PCL NO fit/ O SEE SEC.NO. e ` 4] e t 4 �I-�O05 m J 2.7 a 2]Nq S 5 1.+Nq e+ r 2BA I 2TA ayyq e 2.AA u+t,2 3 Sat `1t `' r 3W , I; t ♦ p � a. u RO. p tr 1 N2° 4.4A(C) 4.1 aeNU 0 +0 d +.Sm, 2aVct z+Nq ],IT 22NCt 'TA(C) t+ �.1 ttp T 2eA Pw r. a ].i] 3 Z2 SA' 1 y au(c) O eaNq .'\ 1 n.. © .\ 2.aNU vTNd w 21A1U NvmtFO,ausw q © y( rsaw we t 2-W-) I ' \ saNrn.w �y0* qp a+e stA(q r � � 5.7Nq e.eA AG03N Furn.P Rwie p aEFcc xo. al ' FOR PCL NO. maefao,n �`�tit/' _ GIA att FOR PCL NO. P SEE SEC.NO. I.sNq N.w AA W1CN-----�.------- MINE J eEF 6G w0m s � � •�� .ft•" 0 NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E EOUTH" SECTION NO V e e r --•-- --»-- m ..NtN.cc.E � `$`'-� Real Property Tax Service Agency T 3 G ------. ear . sr•r --w-- arm �R�rK `� �yynry CrMrWMW.NYffit E -...`. r ___ �� —_.-- ww.u.--.—_ _ dill o A @ onen No [ P +°°° PROPERLY YM t - ,tom:• -y-_•..�_ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ •-•.f.c='�'� Nt �1• 6 .{'.. 1.:. ter.- fti�.•�. F .- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �_ _ � - _ - .. .._. ..... 9. Y*'-.-+srf.:�. .+tf_"j :, - C:. •!ngixi�ti.n'-.-r 4YF^..—... .. _ .a" - _,syn....:.::Y' pp- =a•� >='7a .F_'`�'e+r`Y`C::"�—�.w r.�-'-r-r•'rt i � y 'S'S''„�`�sw ��''T''�L _.__ -. t f! .-.