The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSubject File 5-kv4 Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island, NY 06390 Tele 631-788-7455 w ......... Fax 631-788-7451 fkdvtet & 9b Nk1 "I,d$ rv{%Ni C�,4d1"f1 Gregory Thibodeau, Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Bruce Hubert November 9, 2018 Donald Wilcenski, Chair Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re Fishers Island Waste Management District/ site plan Dear Mr. Wilcenski; The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District (the "Board") has elected to withdraw the current site plan application presently before the Southold Town Planning:Board, The Board has beard the Community comments with respect to the operation of the solid wash district on the island and will be forming a committee (inclUding coni Unity members), to review and recommend changes and iml ro' ements to the district facilities and operations. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. V � truly yours, " , Orego17T:h.ivm Chair, Board of Commissioners cc; Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor William Duffy, Southold Town Attorney Michel Verity, Southold Town Building Dept. Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island, NY 06390 Gregory Thibodeau, Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Bruce Hubert November 9,2018 RESOLUTION SUSPEND ACTION ON CAPITAL PROJECT Whereas,the Board of Commissioners has undertaken the review and design of the proposed consolidation of waste management facilities operated by the District on Fishers Island;and Whereas, significant public comment has been provided critiquing the proposed plan and the anticipated costs associated with the proposed consolidation plan;and Whereas,the Board has determined that further action on the proposed plan should be suspended until such time as the input from members of the Fishers Island community is more fully considered and the waste management operations of the District be evaluated; Now,therefore be it Resolved, that the Board of Commissioners hereby elects to withdraw the site plan application currently under review by the Southold Town Planning Board,and the Board chair is hereby directed to notify the Planning Board of this action;and it is further, Resolved,that the consolidation project(action)is hereby terminated;and it is further Resolved,that the Board will proceed with only those actions such as repairs or improvements of the existing facility which have been identified as safety issues warranting repair and / or mandatory regulatory compliance which actions do not require site plan approval and which are exempt from SEQRA review;and it is further Resolved,that the Board will form an advisory committee including representatives of the Board as well as members of the Fishers Island community(including year round and seasonal residents)to review the waste management operations of the District and to provide a report with recommendations for improvements to these operations and facilities. The Board shall announce publicly the formation of this committee. The composition of the committee including the number of members,and the timeframe for the committee to report its recommendations shall be determined by the Board. LAyf) Nay Greg Thibodeau,Chair, FIWMD OMAILING ADDRESS: OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex f �4� ,+�,, P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 d Southold,NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) , Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Irou PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 15, 2018 William D. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Fishers Island Waste Management District Fox Avenue and Whistler Avenue, Fishers Island SCTM#1000-12.-1-1.1 Dear Mr. Moore: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on September 24, 2018 where the Planning Board found the above-referenced Site Plan Application incomplete for review. Before the Board can commence its full review, it is necessary to provide the following directly to this department: 1. Provide the site plan application fee; or, obtain a waiver of the fee from the Town Board; 2. Provide a complete Site Plan Application form; 3. Provide the following for the proposed development: a. Building elevations and floor plans of all buildings; b. Provide the following on at least nine (9) prints of a revised site plan including the stamp, seal and signature of the NYS licensed professional preparing the plan: i. Storm water drainage calculations pursuant to §236; ii. Parking calculations; iii. Lot coverage percentage (existing and proposed); Fishcrs Island Waste Mang ement. Page 12 October 15 2018 iv. Dimensions and total area calculations for all proposed and existing buildings (to remain or be relocated); v. Landscaping details; vi. Photometric plan for all exterior lighting; vii. Exterior signage information including dimensions and rendering; viii. NYSDEC Operating Permit information. If you have any questions regarding this Site Plan or its process, please do not hesitate to call this office. Respectfully, Brian Cummings Planner Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plan Application Work Session — Completeness Date September 24, 2018 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Fishers Island Waste Management Applicant: FI Waste Management District Date of Submission: January 17, 2018 Tax Map Number: 12.-1-1.1 Project Location: 2760 Whistler Avenue Hamlet: Fishers Island Zoning District: R-120 II. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Commercial Acreage of Project Site: 9.3 acres Building size ±8,000 sq. ft. total This Site Plan Application is for a proposed transfer station including conversion of an existing garage into a meeting space; construction of a 4500 sq. ft. mixing building, 2400 sq. ft. maintenance building and 600 sq. ft. swap shop building; and the relocation of two sheds from off site, all on 9.3 acres in the R-120 Zoning District. III: Analysis A. Existing: a. Composting, yard waste, Construction & Demolition materials, metals — existing buildings for site operations; b. Surrounding land: i. Northeast: 1. two family year round residence in the AHD zoning district; 2. Fishers Island School District; 3. Fishers Island Community Center; 4. General (B) Business zone along the waterfront (2.1 acres); ii. Southern border— Fishers Island Airport & Fort Wright. 1 B. Proposed construction: a. Facility will manage not more than 2,000 ton /year including all material streams and not more than 8,000 cubic yards / year; b. District will not have more than 1,000 cubic yards or 250 tons on site at any one time; c. At present, the District is estimated to handle less than 1,000 tons / year of all materials at both locations; d. Buildings: • Convert/ modify existing garage building into a meeting space / office (proposed total area unknown; building elevations provided); • Construct 40' x 60' (2,400 sq. ft.) 4 — bay maintenance building (building elevations not provided); • Construct 50' x 90' (4,500 sq. ft.) Mixing Building; • Construct 20' x 30' (600 sq. ft.) Swap Shop Building; • Relocated "E-Waste" shed from other site (size unknown); • Relocated existing attendant shed (size unknown). e. Concrete Pads with cover system: • Two (2) 50' x 26' (1 300 sq. ft. each) compost heap pads • Pad for wood grinder/ shredder f. Truck Tonnage Scale • Four (4) compactors • Five (5) roll-off dumpsters C. Parking Required: • No calculations provided • Twelve (12) stalls @ 9' x 18' w/ 1 ADA shown on plan Staff: parking calculations (required & provided) are required; stalls must be a minimum 9' x 19' D. Site Improvements / Modifications: a. Storm water detention basin, storm water infiltration units, as well as pump system and holding tank for on-site storm water reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are being "considered" for collection / reuse in composting operation; 2 b. Existing utility and overhead wires to be removed; c. Addition of pedestrian guardrail around the compactors / roll-offs d. Retaining walls e. 6' high perimeter chain link fence f. Access: • 24' wide access point with security gate; • 24' wide swing gate to beach path; • Asphalt paved loop driveway. E. Bulk Schedule/Code Requirements: R-120 zone a. Lot coverage 10% maximum allowed Total Lot Coverage proposed = Unknown b. Landscape coverage — no required minimum in residential zone F. Exterior Lighting: a photometric plan has not been provided IV: SEQRA a. Applicant is the lead agency (as determined by NYSDEC); b. Classified as an unlisted action; c. Negative Declaration completed. V: Staff Recommendations 1. It is recommended that the above referenced site plan application be found incomplete and to require the following be submitted before it is processed any further: a. Provide the site plan application fee or obtain a waiver of the fee from the Town Board; b. Provide a complete Site Plan Application form; c. Provide the following for the proposed development: i. Building elevations and floor plans of all buildings; ii. Provide the following on a revised site plan- 3 1. Storm water drainage calculations; 2. Parking calculations; 3. Lot coverage percentage (existing and proposed); 4. Dimensions / area calculations for all proposed and existing buildings (to remain or be relocated) 5. Landscaping details. iii. Photometric plan for all exterior lighting; iv. Exterior signage information including dimensions and rendering; v. NYSDEC Operating Permit information; vi. Estimated truck trips. 4 Southold Planning Department Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness - Section 280-133 Project Name: Fishers Island Waste Management District Completed by: Brian Cummings Date: September 24, 2018 Received Comment A. Submission of a complete site plan application shall consist of: (1) A completed site plan application form. X Incomplete (2) The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B Not provided below. Editor's Note: See now § 280-138, Fee schedule for X site plan applications. (3) A completed environmental assessment form. (4) Nine copies of the site plan. (5) Four copies of a property survey, certified by a licensed land surveyor. B. Standards. Site plan design shall include the following items: (1) Technical data: (a) The lot, block and section number of the property, taken from the latest tax records. (b) The name and address of the landowner on record: [1] The names and addresses of adjoining landowners. [2] The name and address of the applicant, if not the same as the landowner. (c) The name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the applicable New York State license seal and signature. (d) Date, graphic scale and North point, whether true or magnetic; if magnetic, show the date of reading. (e) A survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. The site plan may reference a land surveyor's map or base reference map. All distances shall be in feet and hundredths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest 10 seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in 10,000. (f) The locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. If none exist within 500 feet of the subject property, indicate the distance to the nearest intersection with a public street. (g) A separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. (h) The location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining the property. (i) A complete outline of other existing easements, deed 1 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Planning Department restrictions or covenants applying to the property. (j) Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. (k) Site plans drawn at the scale of one inch equals 20 feet. If all required information cannot be shown clearly on one plan, the information should be separated as follows- [1] ollows:[1] Alignment and schedule plan. [2] Grading and drainage [3] Landscaping. [4] Other, e.g., site utilities. (2) Natural features. Received Comment (a) Existing contours with intervals of two feet or less, referred to mean sea level as per United States Geological Survey datum. (b) Boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, tidal bays, saltwater marshes beaches and all freshwater bodies, including wetlands and intermittent streams, perimeter boundaries of shoreline bluffs, dunes and beaches. (c) The location of existing natural features, including but not limited to natural drainage swales, watercourses wooded areas and wetlands, as defined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Board of Trustees of Southold Town, marshes ponds, dunes, bluffs, beaches, kettleholes escarpments, wildlife habitats, flood hazard areas erosion-prone areas and trees of six inches in diameter at a point three feet above the trunk base. (d) The location of any existing cultural and historical Fort Wright/ features within 500 feet of the property boundaries. Airport (3) Existing building structures and utilities: (a) The locations, dimensions and outlines of all buildings, as defined in § 280-4 of this chapter, and all uses of the site. (b) Paved areas, including parking areas, sidewalks and vehicular access between the site and public streets. (c) The locations, dimensions, grades and flow directions of any existing culverts, waterlines or sewage disposal systems, as well as other underground and aboveground utility poles and utility lines within and adjacent to the property. (d) The location and use of all buildings and structures, including curbcuts, within 200 feet of the boundary of the subject property. 2 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Planning Department (4) Proposed construction: Received Comment (a) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements, indicating setbacks from all property lines and horizontal distances from existing structures. (b) The location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as off-street parking and loading areas and pedestrian circulation. (c) The location, direction, power level and time of use for any proposed outdoor lighting or public address X systems. (d) The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be in None proposed; accordance with applicable sign regulations. N/A (e) The location and details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, Drainage fencing (type and location), and grading, including calculations not existing and proposed topography with two-foot X provided on contours (on site and 200 feet beyond the property line) plan; and spot elevations for buildings and all structures drainage calculations, details of drainage structures and watershed areas, where applicable. (f) Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site Storm water stormwater retention, in conformance with Chapter 161 management Highway Specifications. plan provided (g) The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street tree plans, including type, material, size, quantity and location. (h) The location of water and sewer mains, electrical service, cablevision and telephone installations, ground transformers, fire wells and fire hydrants and/or any alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. (i) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans Incomplete: only showing the proposed use of floor area. X elevations of existing building and one side of proposed mixing building provided Site Plan Application elements waivers: § 280-133 C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board shall have the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements of this § 280-133 by resolution at a duly noticed public meeting, for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, where the Planning Board determines that such modifications or any change in use will not require significant changes to existing major site design features, as well as applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture (but excepting retail winery operations), if it determines such requirements are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety, or welfare and to further the objectives set forth in § 280-129. 3 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 24, 2018 4:00 p.m. Southold Town Meeting Hall 2:30 p.m. Executive Session — Advice from Town Attorney 4:00 p.m. Applications Project Name: 870 Love Lane Professional Office and SCTM#: 1000-140-2-17 Apartment Location: 870 Love Lane, Mattituck ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Description: This proposed site plan is for the conversion of an existing two-story single family dwelling to a 1,430 sq. ft. Professional office on the first floor. and 830 sq. ft. apartment on the second floor with nine parking stalls on 0.7 acres in the Residential Office (RO) Zoning District. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Status: Pending ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Action: Review for Determination ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Attachments: Staff Report Project Name: Threes Brewin East SCTM#: 1000-83-3-4.6 J g ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Location: 12820 Oregon Road, south corner of Cox Lane & Oregon Road, Cutchogue Description: This Site Plan Application is for the proposed construction of a 100' x 65' (6,500 sq. ft.) steel building for production (brewery with no retail), office and storage with 21 parking stalls on 0.96 acres in the Light Industrial Zoning District. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Status: Approved ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Action: Review Revised Lighting ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Attachments: Staff Report ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Project Name: Fishers Island Waste Management District SCTM# 1000-12-1-1.1 J g .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Location: 2760 Whistler Avenue, Fishers Island ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Description: This proposed site plan is for the construction of a transfer station including conversion of an existing garage into a meeting space; construction of a 4,500 sq. ft. mixing building, 2,400 sq. ft. maintenance building and 600 sq. ft. swap shop building; and the relocation of two sheds from off site, all on 9.3 acres in the R-120 Zoning District. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Status: New Application ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Action: Review for Completeness ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Attachments. Staff Report .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Fishers Island Waste Management District E E P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390 S f) 2„ 1 �,�� Tele 631-788-7455 VrPtigd Town Nanning Board Gregory Thibodeau,Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Meredith Doyen Bruce Hubert Date: June 28, 2018 To All Involved and/or Interested Agencies From: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Re State Environmental Quality Review Act—Determination of Non-Significance Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue, Fishers Island Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Enclosed herein is the Notice of Determination of Non-Significance (Negative Declaration) for the Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities, which was adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District, as lead agency, on June 27, 2018. Also enclosed are Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form. Sincerely, 1 Beth A. Stern cc: W. Moore, Esq. Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island, NY 06390 Tele 631-788-7455 Gregory Thibodeau, Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Meredith Doyen Bruce Hubert Fishers Island Waste Management District made the following Resolution on Wednesday,June 27, 2018. WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners is considering a "Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Operations" and has undertaken the necessary and appropriate review required under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, after full consideration of the potential impacts of the proposed action, the Board has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment, NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District hereby adopts the Notice of Determination of Non-Significance and Negative Declaration dated June 27, 2018 (Exhibit A) attached hereto and made a part hereof as if more fully set forth herein and directs the Secretary of the District to send copies of same to all involved and interested agencies in accordance with the requirements of SEQRA. Beth A.Stern State Environmental Quality Review Act Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Negative Declaration Name of Action: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Project Location: Fishers Island Waste Management District 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York Project Sponsor: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Lead Agency: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Date: June 27,2018 This notice is issued pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law(State Environmental Quality Review Act[SEQRA])and the implementing regulations therefor at 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(hereinafter,the"FIWMD"),as lead agency,has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment,and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS)will not be prepared. Such determination is based upon the following: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form; 2. Expanded Environmental Assessment(September 2017),as prepared by KGO Consulting,Inc; 3. Consolidated Facilities Planning Report (last revised February 2016), as prepared by Project Management Associates,LLC; 4. Waste Control Plan(May 2016),as prepared by Project Management Associates,LLC; 5. Site development plans,as prepared by Anchor Engineering Services Inc; 6. Topographic Map (last revised May 10, 2018), as prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying&Architecture,PLLC; 7. Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report (January 2017), as prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting; 8. Consultations with and determinations from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP),New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC),and the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA); 9. Coordination and consultations with the Town of Southold;and 10. Site and area inspections. SEQRA Classification: Unlisted Description of Action: The FIWMD is a special district established by the Town of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management services to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties— (1) a transfer station and (2) a compost station and receiving facility for various wastes and select reusable items. The proposed action includes the consolidation of the two facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility,which would allow the FIWMD to manage all of its services and operations at one site and,as part of the proposed action,implement improvements that would modernize its current operations to industry standards,including programs to reduce disposal volumes. Also included are safety and site repairs,drainage improvements,and improvements to site security. Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Specifically,the project includes the following: Transfer Stat�i n and R ec "v" Areas • Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. • Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes from users. • Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers)for scrap metal and bulky wastes. • Relocation of a 240-square-foot(so modular building from the existing transfer station to the project site for use in collecting residential E-waste, discarded small maintenance equipment [e.g., mowers, trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. • Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others(i.e.,a proposed swap shop). CoTilposq'i lip, • Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered building for the purpose of processing and mixing organics for composting. The proposed"mixing building"would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway, opposite the MSW receiving areas. Within the mixing building would be a one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste, cardboard and other fibers, and a reinforced concrete bin wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. • Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration, moisture control by protecting piles from stormwater,and leachate collection. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. GeneralFacilit and Site Improvements, • Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building to be situated adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building, the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed. • Replacement and reinforcement of the existing concrete bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guardrails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)standards. • The deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations would be demolished and the areas would be backfilled with soil and compacted. • Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. • Improvements to site security, including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter,swing gates at the entry,site lighting and security cameras. • Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the creation of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop off areas. • Installation of a stormwater detention basin,stormwater infiltration units,as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. Page 2 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD is proposing to add to the property it owns (and uses)by entering into alease for asmall portion ofland owned bythe Town. The proposed lease infor 2.7± acres ofland that currently includes the site access,the internal paved driveway, attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area. In exchange for the lease of 2.7±acres ofland from the Town of Southold,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. Dpnu implementation of the lease uAceonneutn' the compost station property(with the proposed transfer station operations)would be 10.76±acres (9.33±acres + 2.7± acres = 1.27± acres); however, the actual facility ocoperational area would occupy only 3.23± acres (hereinafter,the"project site"or"project area"),inclusive ofthe facility area currently within the Town-owned property. Upon implementation of the proposed action, the lease of the 1.44-acre parcel occupied by the transfer station would terminate. Site Histocy Prior to the FIWMD waste management operations,the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part ofthe larger Fort H.G.Wright. An approximately 412-acre,U.S.military training and coastal defense facility ootubUxbed in the late 1890'o' Fort B.G. Wright included 12 gun emplacements, small uroou cuugeo' administration buildings,housing,and uuairfield. The subject property was part ofularger coastal artillery station located along the westernmost portion ofFort B.G.Wright. Five batteries for various types ofartillery were placed outhe subject property. These batteries included gun emplacements,oubgcadeconcrete bunkers for the purposes of resource movement and communications, and lookout posts. Remnants ofthe batteries and one lookout post exist today. luthe noid'oeutury,Fort 8.G.Wright was closed and the land was transferred to various entities,including the U.S. Coast Guard,the U.S.Navy,the Fishers Island Union Free School District, and the Town ofSouthold. In 1987, the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD for the purpose of providing solid waste ouuougenoeot opecubnux to the lo)aud'o residents and huoiu00000. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold, the subject property was used for the burning of brush, construction debris and other materials (other than household garbage). In the early 1990'o'the burning of materials was phased out and the current practices and program were introduced. Reasons Supporting this Determination wfNmo'Sigoificaoce: In accordance with SEQRA and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617,the FIWMD,using the EAF and Ospuudod EA and other relevant information cited herein, and comparing same with the thresholds set hortbiu6NYCRB§@617.4uudh17.S'basdetecooiuedtbuttbioprnjeotioaoDuliotedActiou. Coordinated review was conducted with the NYSDEC,Suffolk County Planning Commission,Town of Southold Town Board,Office ofthe Town Attorney and Planning Board. Based upon the information contained in the EAF and Expanded EA,site development plans,facility planning and waste management reports, environmental investigations,consultations with NYSDEC, OPRHP,FAA,and USACE,coordination and consultations with the Town of Southold,and area and site inspections,the FIWMD, as lead agency for the action contemplated herein,and after due deliberation,review and analysis of proposed action, the above-described documents, consultations and inspections, and the criteria set forth in 6 NYCRR g617.7' hereby determines that the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts to the environment. This determination ixsupported bythe following: 1. - Dpuu implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e., 55 gpd] from its separate facilities (i.e., transfer station and ounupoot station) with no projected change tothe water demand. There iaalso uoprojected change iusanitary discharge umthere are no increases iostaff and un new systems proposed. Upon implementation ofthe proposed measures to reuse u portion of the collected and filtered ntornovvuter for on-site composting operations and the wash down ofsurfaces,a reduction in overall water demand is expected. Based upon an assessment of the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth in Article 4, Page Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation ofWasteManagement Facilities Section 76 0-452(B)ofthe Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSQ,the proposed action complies with the requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. The proposed otocmvvutecdetention basin ixto bodesigned to uuapproximate top elevation of 14±-to-16±feet amsl and a base elevation ofseven feet amsl,thus providing four feet ofseparation to groundwater (based upon o groundwater elevation of three feet anoxl). The proposed infiltration units would bolocated otuground elevation ofapproximately%1 feet unno}with the bottom of the infiltration units set at approximately 17 feet aonnL which would provide an approximate separation distance of 14 feet between the base of the units and gcnuudmmtoc. Accordingly,there is adequate depth provided for the filtration of stormwater. The proposed ytoroonmtor nnuougonneut plan is designed to pretreat and uccononunduto xtnoovvuter from an existing facility that currently does not have bocnuul areas for recharge. The subject property is located within u designated sole source aquifer, and thus, the proposed xtocnowator detention hunio is designed such that there will be u oziuinouoo houc'footxeparutiou distance tugroundwater. The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use uousolid waste management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which will cease upon implementation of the proposed action. The proposed action also includes otocnnmmter infiltration units to accommodate roof runoff from the mixing building. The proposed stormwater management plan will comply with the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code,as well as the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (New York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation [NY8D8C]' 2016)' and the New York State Stocoonvutor Management Design Manual (NYSD8C' 2015). As required,prior to undertaking construction,the FIWMD will file for coverage under both the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (8PDBS) Multi-Sector General Permit for Stocmvvater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities [GP'0'12'001) and the SPD8S General Permit for Stornnvvutac Dixcbac0oo from Construction Activity [0Y3DOC Cy 0'15'002)' which includes the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)and the filing nfuNotice ufIntent with the 0YSD8Cprior toconstruction. The SVV9pPwill include udetailed oruxinu and sediment control plan to manage atocmwatecgenerated on-site during construction activities,as well as for post-construction stormwater management.Such SWPPP will also comply with the requirements of the SpD8S Multi-Sector General yocooit for Stocnoamtec Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. The consolidated facility is designed to receive and store wastes (municipal solid waste["MSW'], cardboard,single-stream recyclables,scrap metal and bulky wastes) in designated containers or enclosed areas such that rainfall would not come into contact with waste products. Compost piles will be placed on concrete pads and acover system with leachate collection io proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. The Fl»Ym[D does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. There in u New York State-designated freshwater m/eduud of an approximate size of 1.1 acres locatedatthe southwesterly portion ofthe subject property and to thewestthereof,is an estuarine and uzadue wetland, of approximately 0.76 acre in size included on the National Wetland Inventory. The subject property is also bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound and a limited area of tidal wetlands exists on the northwestern portion of the subject property. The proposed action will not occur within the regulated adjacent areas of New York State- designated freshwater or tidal wetlands. A tate'dooi0uutedfroobwutocorddulvveduudx. A Letter of0ojurisdiction was issued bythe NYSDBCoo Muy24'20I8. Pursuant to§275-3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold (Chapter 275 of Town Code) are lands within 100 feet of any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland, beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, vernal pool, creek, estuary, Page Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities stream, pond, canal, lake, land under water, or land subject to tidal action; as well as all Town Waters. The proposed action does not include any disturbance or activities within 100 feet of any of the wetlands,waterbodies or areas above. Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas,the proposed action includes measures that would improve the existing site conditions. Currently,there are no stormwater management controls to contain stormwater on-site and to prevent runoff to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon implementation of the proposed action, stormwater would be captured and directed to stormwater infiltration units as well as collected, pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention basin. The placement of erosion control blankets at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff on areas that are currently devoid of vegetation. Furthermore,the proposed concrete block gravity wall relies on the weight of the blocks for stability and,therefore,the space required for a gravity wall is less than other systems thus reducing disturbance. Overall, therefore, the proposed action would result in beneficial impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint. Based upon the above, neither groundwater quantity or quality or surface water quality will be significantly impacted by the proposed project. 2. Bias 1i ksk) ces- The subject property is within the boundaries of the New York State Coastal Area,and the Town of Southold has an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP). Based upon a consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP. The property is also not located within a floodplain,and thus,the proposed action would not increase flooding potential. Accordingly,no significant adverse impacts to coastal resources would be expected. 3. t,iadfi an "1" ,_)0 - Approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed, with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stormwater detention basin, mixing building and internal loop driveway. The area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would increase by 15,289±sf(0.35±-acre),with a corresponding decrease of 8,266±sf(0.19±acre)for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023±sf(0.16±acre)for slopes greater than 15 percent. However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprint and would not result in changes that could create the potential for runoff to surrounding areas of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanket on the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an area that is currently devoid of vegetation. The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the stormwater management basin, which would result in the beneficial impact of containing stormwater from a large area of the existing facility. Based upon the above analyses,no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. 4. Qrgima g e ii ; Eros1(n and ,'joo The proposed action would result in a minimal increase (0.79±-acre) in impervious surface, which would result in a minimal increase in stormwater runoff. The proposed drainage plan would accommodate stormwater from additional impervious surface area,in addition to areas within the project site that are developed or within operational areas. Specifically, a stormwater detention basin and subgrade infiltration units are proposed. Stormwater to be accommodated in the proposed detention basin would be first filtered with a Stormceptor© (or similar) system before entering the basin. The proposed basin also includes overflow protection with a riprap spillway at Elevation 10. In cases of heavy storm events, stormwater would flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stormwater system located along the adjacent roadway. Page 5 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation cfWaste Management Facilities The proposed st000wmteciufiltrutiuuunits would accommodate roof runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary doxiAu includes the use of Stornntecb 3C'7400 coDooduu chambers,which allow for optimal storage volumes in relatively small footprints,thus minimizing excavation. The consolidated facility would receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed areas such that there is no potential for cuiufuD or surface runoff to interact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the pUox from atormmmtec. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program ioalso proposed. Overall,the waste management practices utthe facility are expected to mitigate the potential adverse impacts associated with surface flow and waste areas. The proposed stormwater detention basin and stormwater infiltration units would be constructed such that there is an adequate separation distance of,at minimum,four feet from the base of the basin and units to groundwater, in accordance with 0YSD8C requirements for sole source aquifers. Based upon soil borings performed in u,ouo of the project site, and the current development that exists on the project site, no soil limitations are expected. However, prior to construction,additional test borings will be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and,if required,soil mixing would beundertaken. Overall,based outhe current condition ofthe site(Le, without a stormwater management system),the proposed drainage improvements would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treatment. The proposed action would also comply with Chapter 236 of the Town of Southold Town Code, vvbicb regulates xtocoonmtecmanagement and discharge associated with land-disturbing activities and projects that involve areplacement uforaddition toimpervious surfaces. Prior to and during construction,erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place such that the potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities will be minimized. The erosion and sedimentation controls and methods by vvbicb st000mmtec would be accommodated during construction would be designed to be consistent with New York State standards and manuals and the Town of Southold stormwater management regulations set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code. The property is not located within a floodplain, and thus,the proposed action would not increase flooding potential. Based on the above, implementation of the proposed action will not result in any substantial increase in the potential for leaching ocdrainage pnohlenoo'erosion,ocflooding. S — Upon implementation of the proposed action, the volume of waste requiring disposal off-Island would decrease,therefore decreasing the number of trucks having to visit the lx>uud for waste pick-up and container drop-off. The proposed consolidation would also remove truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the tcauofoc station. The proposed action may result in additional 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour;however,this projection does not account for the resident ocbusiness delivering tothe two sites on the same day. ltcan he expected that a resident or business selects a waste drop day when they travel to both the transfer station and compost station for disposal. Further,the transfer station iuopen only half-days uu Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. Regarding parking, the proposed project will create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons tosafely park and unload materials. Access tothe subject property would remain iuits current location. However, the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way, paved loop driveway for improved circulation. Overall, the proposed action will not result io significant adverse traffic orparking impacts. 6. Ab[Quall —The proposed action will reduce the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and drop-off and will not result in a significant increase in patron traffic.The subject property is an existing solid waste facility accessed via Whistler Avenue and 0.2 mile from the ferry Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities dock,and thus, uovehicle delays would heexpected. Axsuch,there would beuoincrease ivair emissions associated with traffic or vehicle idling. Further, no new mi0ui8cuut air e,uiooioun sources are proposed. The proposed composting cover system would protect pUou' thus minimizing the potential for dust and miudhoruo sediment. With respect to air quality during construction,land surfaces disturbed during construction would be paved or planted as soon as practicable following disturbance,thereby minimizing the potential for the generation of fugitive dust. Additionally,during dry periods,a water truck would be brought to the site for the wetting of soils to further minimize dust. Excessive idling of construction equipment or vehicles would not bepermitted. Accordingly,no significant adverse changes in existing air quality are expected toresult during construction. Overall, based upon the above, no significant adverse cbuu0en in existing air quality will result upon implementation ofthe proposed action. 7. hLQiag-The proposed improvements would take place between 7:38anoto5:30pnuduring non- holiday vveebdays and on ulimited basis, would be undertaken on Saturdays. No construction would take place nuSundays. The proposed development would generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction, truck movements, and heavy equipment operations. Heavy machinery, such as front-end loaders, graders, bulldozers, and bacbboeo' would be used intermittently throughout the proposed project's construction. To nniti0uteoouotructiou'celuteduoineimpuoto.tbecouotcuobounoauugecvvUlovecseeuodpceveut the idling of construction vehicles. In addition,all construction equipment utilized on-site will be equipped with properly operating noise muffler systems. The FlVVMD and/or construction manager will also respond to any noise complaints during construction. As such, no significant adverse construction noise impacts will result. With respect to noise impacts after development, the subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years and the activities to be undertaken upon implementation of the proposed action would not significantly alter the use ofthe property. The subject property isalso adjacent tothe Elizabeth Field Airport. The proposed project would not increase the number of equipment operational hours of the on-site wheeled loader and may actually result iu uoli0bt reduction in such operational buum since the project vvou>8 involve the ioopleoopututinu of covered compost system. Further, upon lnuplonueotutiou of the proposed action, all source- separated materials would be handled inside the mixing building. oucce'aepurutednuutorialownuldbebuudlodionidetbenoixiu0bui)diug. Adiesel-powered shredder io and will continue to operate outside to process logs and brush. Regarding the truck activity,the project would result in a slight reduction in the number of off-island truck trips. Although trucks would be concentrated at the compost site,all trucks are required to be compliant with over-the- roadooioeliouitxaodtbeFlVVMDotuffureuu'sitetnuddcensuuypoteutiu>iooueo. AdditiouuUy'tbo trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contained tnthe site. As such,upon implementation ofthe proposed action,the noise environment at the subject property would be similar to that under existing conditions. Overall,the proposed action will not result iuany significant adverse noise impacts. 8. Odor ' Upon implementation of the proposed action, the FlVVMD would commence accepting source-separated organic waste from users of the facility,which would be placed in the proposed mixing building, ground-up and added tothe composting mass. This would result iuuooverall reduction in the amount of putrescible material in the outbound MSW containers. The proposed composting operation would occur inside the mixing building, vvbicb would maintain aerobic conditions; thereby, further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally, the composting approach would include u full cover over the composting nnuom' with aeration of the pile automatically monitored and activated within. Such improvements modify the current practice of outdoor mixing and uzauugennout, to indoor mixing and u cover system to protect and /uaua0o Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities compost piles. Overall,based upon the above, the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts associated with odors. 9. Solid'Waste Ceneradonand Namakm !-The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes, and similar factors. Single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted and used on the Island, thus reducing the amount of waste required for transport and disposal off-Island. It is estimated that an additional 100±-to-150± tons of cardboard material,food waste,paper and MSW could be composted each year,which represents an approximately 14-to-20 percent waste reduction for traditional disposal. There would be also be a corresponding reduction in hauling and disposal costs. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling, composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. ion I Waste. A S rstainableater Lils Mamma mien .Strati» +for New York Sti e. Adopted 12/27/2010) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States Environmental Protection Agency,[ .5.EISA Sm� taf n aide Materiais Mangy gem „":, lllanml 2017-2122. October 2015)to improve waste management practices. Overall, based upon the above,no significant adverse impacts would occur. Rather,the proposed action is expected to result in beneficial impacts to solid waste management. 10. NatLrr•al Coninwnitm s-The proposed action is to occur within an operational area of an existing solid waste management facility that has occupied the subject property for 30 years. The proposed action would not include the removal of any native or natural vegetation,and includes stormwater management controls to accommodate stormwater runoff generated within the project site. The proposed slope stabilization measures, including seeding areas with native, non-invasive plantings and installation of erosion control blankets,would protect areas outside the project site, including areas of natural vegetation,wetlands and surface waters. Overall,the proposed action would not include the removal or destruction of vegetation or fauna; would not substantially interfere with the movement of any resident or migratory species; and would not impact threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the associated habitats. As such, no significant adverse impacts to natural resources would be expected upon implementation of the proposed action. 11 Critical l`m i'_ar °cam, -The subject property is situated within two Critical Environmental Areas(CEAs)--Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA. Both CEA's have their designations,as defined,"due to benefit to human health&protect drinking water." The proposed action will comply with the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards, which were established to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. Also, the proposed action would establish stormwater controls, include methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from the public water supply would be reduced,and situates improvements on developed or disturbed areas,thus requiring no natural vegetation to be removed. As such, the environmental characteristics of the CEAs will not be impaired 12. His:or m coal rcl " Ja l .r°a' ~gin Aesthetic I .,.o °°os. including Conill2unily and „ ej,p,�ll!)orho(ocl(htiiraie ter-There are no properties on Fishers Island listed or nominated for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places;however,there are structures within Fort H.G. Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. The Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District is also eligible for listing. According to the Cultural Resources Information System Page 8 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities of OPRHP,the subject property is also located within an archaeological-sensitive area. However, in correspondence dated June 29,2017,OPRHP advised there are no archaeological concerns. Regarding historic resources, in correspondence dated August 4, 2017, OPRHP indicated the following: "the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries, and 2.A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction...Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline." In accordance with OPRHP's comments, the requested plans and specifications would be provided to OPRHP prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such,the proposed action would have no significant adverse impacts to historic resources. The overall visual character of the subject property is that of a solid waste management facility. The proposed action would not alter the topography or vegetative buffers that exist between Fox Lane and the project site. The proposed design situates the mixing building and composting pads at the westerly portion of the facility, where there is adequate land area and is furthest from residential proper-ties. It is expected that portions of the mixing building would be visible from the site entrance; however,the visual changes are not expected to be significant. The FIWMD is also proposing to maintain the existing perimeter vegetation as well as to establish an area of evergreens along the northern area of the project site (adjacent to the operating area) for the purposes of providing a visual buffer from residential properties to the northeast of the facility. Based upon the FAA review of the building elevations, the proposed action would not pose a hazard to the Elizabeth Field airport. Overall,implementation of the proposed action would not result in the impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The proposed action includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings,and pole lighting on select perimeter areas,which would comply with the Town of Southold lighting standards (Chapter 172 of the Town Code),and is subject to the review and approval of the Town Building Department. As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse lighting impacts. 13. The proposed action will not result in a major change in the quantity or type of energy used. 14. Public Health Impacts-The FIWMD site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program-Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)program. The FUDS program includes four categories, in which, based on available information and consultations with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),the FIWMD was determined to be investigated under two of the four categories:(1)CON/HTRW(Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste), and (2) MMRP (Military Munitions Response Program). Both of these investigations are being led and implemented by USACE. Fort H.G.Wright is also listed as a New York State (NYS) Inactive Waste Site (#152241). With respect to the CON/HTRW investigation, the USACOE has advised the FIWMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and one transformer on the subject property. Based upon information provided by USACOE, the six USTs and one transformer are located outside of the project area. Pursuant to the USACOE in October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017;however,said work did not occur. The USACOE has now advised of its plan to commence work in the summer of 2018. Page 9 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation ofwasteManagement Fanmms With respect tnthe K8MR9investigation,the FlVVMDcaused uoenvironmental investigation tobo prepared to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance(UXO) in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality. There is no reported history of UXO being found at the site;however,in 2007,the US Army Corps of Engineers recommended additional mmrb on Fort H.G.Wright. The FlVVMD is not aware of any additional investigations since the 2007 recommendation; however, the potential ' presence ofUX0caused the FlVVMDtoundertake investigations. The environmental investigation included geophysical investigation, which did not identify any subsurface anomalies iothe vicinity ofthe former batteries. There were subsurface anomalies detected oothe site,but given the locations, it is not thought tu be DX0. Notwithstanding, the FlVVMD would undertake additional activities prior to and during construction to minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UXO. Regarding the soil investigation,soil samples were collected from areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based upon the ounuyUug results, there are no restrictions for reuse of soils on-site and no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel ocusers oothe site. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result iothe creation ofuhazard tohuman health. 15. 'There are oochanges tothe current land use umasolid waste management facility. The proposed action would not significantly change the intensity ofuse,ua the services on-site nmu>8 be altered to include the receiving of municipal solid waste and recyclables in four compactor boxes,while modernizing the activities performed on-site. As such, the proposed action will not substantially change the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural,open space or recreational resources,or in its capacity to support existing uses. 16. - The FlVVMD is u special district established by the Town of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. lu1987'the subject property was transferred from the Town tn the FlVV0lD for waste management services. For 30 years,the subject property has been used for such purpose. Regarding land use plans,the Fishers lx>uud Strategic Plan 2007'2017 recognized the two nnuiu objectives of the proposed action, including:(1)the desire ofthe FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost station property in order to reduce operating and otatOuQ costs and improve ofDoioogy; and (2) reducing the volume ofgarbage that iobeing shipped off the Island toreduce costs. Aconsistency analysis nf the proposed action with the LWRP was performed determined to be consistent with the policies and 0nulx of the LVVDP. As such, the proposed action will not create a material conflict with a community's current plans orgoals anofficially approved oradopted. 17. ILi1M. icts-The ylVVMDhandles approximately 792.5tons ofsolid waste per year and no cbuo0eo are projected upon implementation ofthe proposed action. Any changes io amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population cbuugeu' and similar factors. Accordingly, the proposed action will not result iu any significant adverse growth-inducing impacts. 18. The proposed action will not create umaterial demand for other actions that would result iuone ofthe above-discussed consequences. 19. fL1L7LLJ1atJVC 1111vacts- Implementation ofthe proposed action will not result in changes in two or more elements of the environment,no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a significant adverse impact on the environment. Further, Page 10 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities implementation of the proposed action will not result in cumulative impacts that would meet any of the criteria set forth at 6 NYCRR§617.7. For Further Information: Contact Person: Beth Stern Address: Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O.Box 22 Fishers Island,New York 06390 Email: fiwastemanagement@gmail.com Telephone No.: (631) 788-7455 Page 11 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Conso8da0000fWaste Management Facilities Acopy wfthis Determination iobeing sent to: Town ofSouthold Town Board,9.0.Box 1179'Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold,Office of the Town Attorney,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 119 71 Town ofSouthold Planning Board,P.O.Box 1179'Southold,New York 11971 K0e. Carrie Meek Gallagher, Director, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY at Stony Brook,SOCircle Road,Stony Brook,New York 1179O Mr.Jim Wade,P.E.,Environmental Engineer 2,Division of Materials Management,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Sherri Aicher, Environmental Analyst, Division of Environmental Permits, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 1l790 Ms.Beth A.Cumming,Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator,NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation,Division for Historic Preservation,P.O.Box 189'Waterford,New York 12888'0189 Suffolk County Planning Commission,8.Lee Dennison Building'11dzFloor,100Veterans Memorial Highway, P.0.Box 61O0.Hauppauge,New York 11788'009g Agency Use only[If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project. F1Wti,c_c0nWkiaU0n0rFaCU lay art 2-Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date: ist p tPart 2 Pee agency. Part 2 is designed to help the leadagency inventoryall potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s)will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So,the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2,the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed,the lead-agency wilbliave identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application,maps,supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer"Yes"to a numbered question,please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer"No"to a numbered question,move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box"Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact,it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity,that is,the"whole action".. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on,or physical alteration of, [:]NO OYES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1.D.1) t `Yes ', arasmwc� cstaons a I 'No ' move on to Section 2 '+Ys'Y ,� IF J�"s Rx� � ,4+b f!""m iY'"'.1 r r , c i r f,l 11 Fla {�f�i�iwV a (^ �Y✓r' Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large r l l" 5 'ru lvs r( P'„i r bilalEtnz r''i,iry' r a ki 5' ac ✓ ar'Sf ti i a r 'ti+ 1r Y i. Question(s) impact impact may ma OCCur OC_ cur a.The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d less than 3 feet. b.The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15%or greater. E2f c.The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed,or E2a ❑ ,generally within 5 feet of existing,ground surface. d.The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ❑ of natural material. e.The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Dle ❑ ❑ or in multiple phases. f.The proposed action may result in increased erosion,whether from physical D2�D2q ❑ [� disturbance or vegetation removal(including from treatment by herbicides). g.The proposedaction is,or may be,located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i ® ED h.Other impacts:The proposed action would result In an alteration of land lyfre coverages. ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of,or inhibit access to,any unique or unusual land forms on the site(e.g.,cliffs, dunes, ®NO ❑YES minerals,fossils,caves). (See Part 1.E.2.g) answer questions a-c. If"No", move on to Section 3. r^,"w,,4fanr,N,""'"µ"a ;y,, �X a� �fYs az�N'a, °� i'nJ/,° DIY°I� '✓« ,r y J ,✓r;n.r ,y;. rb v op s r. ✓y"rJ✓r ';i J 4 iur �>'', Relevant No,or Moderate «w " r-✓ y r � k4u Jq ` G ` r r,c b Jar 7 T i r,K w3 °1 i r kr wk d Part I small to large y . L�r Ur~i�:^k��+��Jff��rw�,�Y� Jr�r�..4°q,Jl ah�pr��Gl��i p�l�r^rr df X74 8� �JI k�J J,FY r'yn�M.,^�" ,y � �rr�,yJKrd�zx. a� ,g m gra k 7 x Question(s) impact impact may �K�py vti ✓��r�J�,✓��yM �`� � � pvJ h�"1 � �r r,+y,,r}�, r`r,r tA2 Vi hi i '1 yup nti ` i F:;I4 r+ ✓�-✓e ,tr✓w,ro�'1',,,9esrsi„✓„rn J.,V'+r, .d.o W.:.7l ^p'" ',''V'f ✓ay,roY+, , .v�J,✓`�,d�r n.;CzwG4",rr'r 4 rru�'� ua y;1J 1 .r w'.�.vr�eradLd ''",.,'n�a'�rr°4`'",x,J ma OCCur occur a.Identify the specific land form(s)attached: E2g ❑ b.The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ❑NO ®YES bodies,(e.g.,streams,rivers,ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2,E.21) I I answer"Yes", questions a-1. "No", move on to Section 4. _�y„._... .. .___.�� v_ Relevant No,or Moderate Y d, / s v ^f r'rb r ! XYi,!Y � �J, J�krV` C r i Jh y! 4 A ✓ C ,y „ !`2N l r r a Y r „ Part I small to large ✓y"yf{ cJ�friiX4 N✓ °ya1a9r 'u �V rR r1µ4 M4 n tlnY ' Xi4Y m' XIX`.d4�rn � r y�rr.. w i Y ! '�":r V y ui y,e; wyY�'e B 'i �ri y " r !w' !I ('{k,k r r;J n" i r+ rJ , ,y ✓ f" d l 11 QlleSt10II/S) CpImact impact may rr : Question(s ) o u r r ✓ '^8( s ' n d It a ,r d fi, µ. yr it ��, ry .�a.,,.uu.,r,.✓_,..i .G. u. .,.,r;/�.rr�yr...J�r�wuht,an..��.�"i°far..la, rr:. .,,.,r ,.,,_. „,. lY.r,.... rc>, .e.l! ,..hu,ramhrr(�o3.pc,� IIla occur CCur a.The proposed action may create a new water body, D2b,D lh ® ❑ b.The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10%or more than a D2b 0 ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c.The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ® ❑ from a wetland or water body. d.The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ® ❑ tidal wetland,or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e.The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody,either from upland erosion, D2a,D2h 0 ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f.The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s)for withdrawal D2c 0 1771 of water from surface water. g.The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s)for discharge D2d 0 EJ of wastewater to surface water(s). h.The proposed action may cause soil erosion,or otherwise create a source of D2e 0 ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i.The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h 0 0 downstream of the site of the proposed action. j.The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q,E2h ® ❑ around any water body. k.The proposed action may require the construction of new,or expansion of existing, Dla,D2d ® ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1.Other impacts: . ® ❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water,or []NO OYES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1.D.2.a,D.2.c,D.2.d,D.2.p,D.2.q,D.2.t) If"Yes", answer questions a-h. If"No", move on to Section 5. s ud 6Y fiW lwc i b Pw *r d r ✓✓ Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may Him occur OCCur a.The proposed action may require new water supply wells,or create additional demand 132c 0 ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. b.Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable 132c withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ......... c.The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D 1 a,D2c 0 sewer services. d.The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. 132d,E21 0 El e.The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c,Elf, ® ❑ where groundwater is,or is suspected to be,contaminated. Elg,Elh f.The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p,E21 over water or an aquifer. g.The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h,D2q, (a feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21,D2c h. Other impacts: 'The�arorosttt ¢tre wager usage on t rrr �_, station properly. A stormwater basin is proposed to accommodate and recharge stormwater on-sife. 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. ONO ❑YES (See Part 1.E.2) I "Yes", answer questions a-g. I "No", move on to Section 6. Relevant No,or Moderate u wv, � 41,�h��('"wrr'Y w �➢�� r u i il.Jb F ! I r t! i rw k i� l l t k V Vry Y , r 4 i r r Part I small to large i ,w r dir"°� �. ''�.% e «•l nab N3 w"w f ��r��r r rh'u/ im act impact may y, Question(s) p p y .�.rw ..,,.r✓„e r7, ,wl",�r'�»rr,a „rwdw' P ur �'.,+,.,,. . n r. d i,-amu+ i r>x..r, h, w r r.. + .�, ,, ,,.rrrw mi_ . ,d`r <",: ma occur occur a.The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ❑ ❑' b.The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j ❑ c.The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. Elk ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action may result in,or require,modification of existing drainage D2b,D2e ❑ ❑ patterns. e.The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. 132b,E2i, 11 ❑ E2',E2k f.If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action,is the dam in need of repair, Ele ❑ ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g.Other impacts: 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ZNO YES (See Part 1.D.2.f.,D,2,h,D.2.g) If"Yes", answer questions a-f If"No", move on to Section 7. i Relevant No,or Moderate prrr ,�Sl.'+i;ui�. u" 9d ��.i� � wJ,^uro9 ° hi r ✓�' 'p� ".,^a+ 1,� ,! kr Part I small to large �r ✓ e a u"F r� ,�� p1,y�ia � l � r n1 +alr r , , r X✓ a 1 Question(s) impact impact may r +✓r(nf � aff + ( r-� r '�q+,�� Y":.✓�r�k"'dmf� ri r ' �<^ "/ � + a 7.r i�r G� ra��w'. r =r.�f., r>rf'9rr;r1 �. 9U,�,r�`r�.„. _.�;�ra<.x �r,,e o...,,.. _,r. do.,.. :,, z', „.,, y,✓ ,,,r„'r. nlaOCCUr. OCCUr a.If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits,the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide(CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide(N20) D2g ❑ ❑ iii.More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons(PFCs) D29 ❑ ❑ iv.More than.045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride(SF6) D2g ❑ ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g ❑ ❑ hydrochloroflourocarbons(HFCs)emissions vi.43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant,or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c.The proposed action may require a state air registration,or may produce an emissions 132f,D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs.per hour,or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d.The proposed action may reach 50%of any of the thresholds in"a”through"c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e.The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f.Other impacts: _ ,., ❑ ❑ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2.m.-q.) NO ❑YES If"Yes" answer questions a- '. If"No", move on to Section 8. b( 1 dil ✓ k „ 1 I r �,if�r� �;yet �1 �� ,��, 1� ✓f�, �w � , r� � , �% Relevant No,or Moderate +' y "✓ r ��' a' ✓ r`� <°' Part I small to large r �� t I , a+ ✓ r Question(s) impact impact may 1 may occur occur a.The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o ❑ ❑ threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ❑ any rare,threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the federal government. c.The proposed action may cause reduction in population,or loss of individuals,of any E2p ❑ ❑ species of special concern or conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ❑ ❑ any species of special concern and conservation need,ps listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e.The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural ER ❑ Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect.. f.The proposed action may result in the removal of,or ground disturbance in,any E2n ❑ portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: g.The proposed action may substantial) interfere with nesting/breeding,foraging,or Elm ❑ over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. It.The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, Elb ❑ ❑ grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type&information source: i.Proposed action(commercial,industrial or recreational projects,only)involves use of D2q ❑ ❑' herbicides or pesticides. j.Other impacts: ww- 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a.and b.) ONO ❑YES I "Yes", answer questions a h If"No". move on to Section 9 �r Relevant ... No,or Moderate Y Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur „ a.The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c,E3b ❑ ❑ NYS Land Classification S stem. b.The proposed action may sever,cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela,Elb ❑ (includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard„orchard,etc). c.The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ ❑ active agricultural land. d.The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb,E3a uses,either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District,or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e.The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a,Elb ❑ ❑ management system. £The proposed action may result,directly or indirectly,in increased development C2c,C3, ° ❑ potential or pressure on farmland. 132c,D2d g.The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ ❑ Protection Plan. It.Other impacts: ....,_�, Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in ONO ❑YES sharp contrast to,current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1.E.La,E.Lb,E.31.) I "Yes", answer uestions a- I "No", o to Section 10. §�"<au a!: y"a f'"F 'krb ''talaaGa�'�Tvj� F.i"1N�"` �AYPaar6 4i�M4aw lw baa ia;n a '^�iIk i Iua I S a e i F la,aaj r r,Vu F xy.a ii a Relevant No,or Moderate ,4i,( uiraa'gyp Iry a+ iJi oN iex»w^'u: u`� k"Ja'rr C`ro' d u i/r. + ) a a N v t?C 'Ea P.aFwP*a Pa y/u P P'„%v"., Par rp Ew7rr +T a a� ✓ a '' P� err c G Part I small to large mfm' �r°iEA7� + ,1,� PRra r ap i raf rar I e I y �� ,nt�vr� Question(S) impact impact may � n. r r i v y,a"� �� va. ra � -k l' v ) r ✓ v i J may occur OCCUr a.�,�, 4. r,"�� ,J ,.�"PdMa�4,. •, a,tim_�a,,,a e rw, ,t, a• ,.,. ., m e... e..,p,, a .. _r,.a .•�ff„.%: a.Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal,state,or local E3h ra ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. b.The proposed action may result in the obstruction,elimination or significant E3h,C2b screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c.The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally(e.g.,screened by summer foliage,but visible during other seasons) ❑ ii.Year round d.The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: i. Routine travel by residents,including travel to and from work E29' ❑ ❑ ii.Recreational or tourism based activities Elc ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h 03 L1 appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. £ There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D la,E1 a, 01 ❑ project: Dlf,Dlg 0-1/2 mile -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g.Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO ©YES resource. (Part 1.E.3.e, f. and g.) If"Yes”, answer questions a-e. If"No", go to Section 11. K � a Relevant No,or Moderate J� Part I small to large Question(s) impact Impact may occur occur a.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3e to,any buildings,archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3f ® ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory. c.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3g 0 ❑ to,an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d.Other impacts: ❑ ❑ If any of the above(a-d)are answered"Moderate to large impact may e. occur",continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e,E3g, ❑ El of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or Me,E3f, ❑ integrity. E3g,Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e,E3f, ❑ El are out of character with the site or property,or may alter its setting. E3g,E3h, C2,C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a �NO YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c,E.l.c.,E.2.q.) u� � t �� 1 Relevant No or Moderate I Yes , answer stions a e I "No", to Section ue Part I small to large Question(s) Impact impact may I r' ma occur OTur a.The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions,or"ecosystem D2e,Elb ❑ ❑ services",provided by an undeveloped area,including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage,nutrient cycling,wildlife habitat. E2m,Ego, E2n,E2 b.The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a,Elc, ❑ 0 C2c,E2 c.The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a,C2c ❑ ❑ with few such resources. Elc,E2q d.The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c,Elc ❑ ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO YES environmental area(CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes", answer uestions a-c. I "No", o to Section 13. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Y p �r ,p Question(s) impact impact may ma occur occur a.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or EM m ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c.Other impacts: The su ect properly is located within the boundaries of the Fishers Island CEA ® El and the Peconic Say and Environs CEA. Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. E:]NO ❑✓ YES (See Part 1.D.2 j) I "Yes", answer uestions a- . I "No", o to Section 14. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large r,G„;„��°ww��"r�rgr,ri„, e,�k xtrmm�,prcKu�� cei��rr w"rr+ s 'yru r a� .E✓�" ✓i� x ” ,� '” �a� `* -fv^ � "�M��'� u, n,rl. nvnlc 4 4'hfC�✓Iif4yh'%x ,9M'�✓A'Y+�aawr"t k �J^Yw d.rr".r,M rY 9f E� Csn,�,a aA"�cr + ern e "y r" s,wr,CP,v v` 4 Q110StlOn(S) impact impact may a I ead � , ✓ �., n%.o»M vitt * ,%" '" � ry"Yr«%"a d'Apn '"7M,;,�ilAiaiwe�iYiC+"sYa:"�° ,✓C� r �,%art r ; r " ^ ✓ l yy,, r°.J /✓i°° " rr ^ ma oCCllr occur a,projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ® ❑ b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ® ❑ more vehicles. c.The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j E d.The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ❑ e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j f. Other impacts:CJpon!M temenkt Uqn the rh odd reet9cation of the transfer station activities 0 El may result in an additional 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour at the compost station site. 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. ©NO ❑YES (See Part 1.D.21) I "Yes", ans ruestions a-e. I "No", go to Section 15. � hr`� ✓e ^, ,�� °" � �,� ryer?n �, �,` � , , r"� Relevant No,or Moderate ii%%' ✓ 'ydf8✓ ^iCrCk i �A9 t'er✓ xCtr � rq ' G ' �;�,pi✓x:o- ✓u n C rel r `^ ^ ✓ """ .:. Part I Small t0 large J k`'� r N� ! y %�✓ kr C' ,✓a ✓r: rr✓ r, ✓.@"A, a ntl ' ✓ `^' r, �,,�✓ � '14ti °� f r✓ %.� ^��✓✓ u%ur+x rd r�✓C r k nMr�y 7✓✓rf h ,s r ✓ i 1�fe Qu estlon(S) impact impact may ✓ r+r '� nr i' 'C r Pe.A f ,l,r d r "A✓r r ;. ? «, ✓ ^ " r , 1/ °✓+ f✓F a '' ;e;M,¢ �r ria $ a, r � i °,� .�,,"kl �": r� ✓,<, ., •° 4 �` r x., may OCCUr OCCUr a.The proposed action will require a new,or an u de to an existin ,substation. D2k ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission Dlf, ❑ ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a Dlq,D2k commercial or industrial use. c.The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 i Mhrs per year of electricity. D2k ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dlg ❑ feet of building area when completed. e.Other Impacts: 15. Impact on Noise,Odor,and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise,odors,or outdoor lighting. [:]NO ©YES (See Part 1.D.2.m.,n.,and o.) I "Yes", answer, uestions a-,f I "No", go to Section 16. , Relevant No,or Moderate t 9 y �� 1 N 7 , r �� rY ✓ d 7I't� 1 r Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may "j5oo;"C,r 4m'✓r;14,U�r "ori! "r�i%A b' i^e J �v N e ,:,�� •,', ra; x may occur occur ,,,, ,,. ,rr.wn, o w" rA`P✓,ro ,° .%h�aki°,A, ,✓. ;,A,,.. �P ^, ° ,; a.The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m [ �] regulation. b.The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m,Eld ® [� hospital,school,licensed day,care center,or nursing home. c.The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. 132o ® ❑ Page 8 of 10 d.The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing D2n,Ela ❑ area conditions. f.Other impacts:ABI waste acttvalles would be conso ❑ activity and operating Fours.. 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ❑NO ©YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part l.D.2.q.,E.1. d. f.g. and h.) 1 Yes"* answer u estions a m 1 'Norr�to Section 17 �d Relevant No or Moderate A Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may n1.a' CCCllr OCcur a.The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school,hospital,licensed day E1 d [ ❑ care center,grouphome„rau'rs'in home or retirement co �raunit l„ b.The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg,Elh ® ❑ c.There is a completed emergency spill remediation,or a completed environmental site Elg,Elh ❑ remediation on,or atljacert to,the site of the proposed action. d.The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg,Elh ❑ property(e.g.,easement or deed restriction). e.The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg,Elh EJ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. £The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t 0 ❑ generation,treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g.The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q,Elf ❑' management facility. L1 _ wawa h.The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q,Elf ® ❑ i.The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal,or processing,of D2r,D2s ® D solid waste. j.The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf,Elg 0 ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k.The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf,Elg ❑, ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1.The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s,Elf, ® J ❑ project site. D2r. in. Other impacts: ❑ ❑' Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. W]NO YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2, and C.3.) d Yes , answer questions a h l `No? a to Section 187,7- Relevant No,or Moderate �. Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur. a.The proposed action's land use components may be different from,or in sharp C2,C3,Dla ❑ ❑ contrast to,current surrounding land use patterri(s). Ela,Elb b.The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city,town or village C2 ❑ ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. ............. c.The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2,C2,C3 ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans,or other regional land use C2,C2 ❑ ❑ plans. e.The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3,D 1 c, ❑ ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Dld,Dlf, D1d,Elb f The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4,132c,D2d ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g.The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts(e.g.,residential or C2a ❑ Cl commercial development not included in the proposed action) h.Other: 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. ©NO YES (See Part 1.C.2,C.3,D.2,E.3) 1f `Yes , answer uestsvxn a l `No" proceed to Part 3 Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities,structures,or areas Me,ISM,E3g ❑ ❑ of historic importance to the community. b.The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services(e.g. C4 ❑ ❑ schools,police and fire) a The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2,C3,Dlf there is a shortage of such housing. Dlg,Ela d.The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2,E3 ❑ ❑ or desig�tated public resources. e.The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2,C3 ❑ 1:1 character. f.Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2,C3 Cr �_13 Ela,Elb E2g,E2h g.Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF,as noted,plus this additional support information v investigations,Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ConsistencyAssessment Form,and agency consultations and findings, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact,it is the conclusion of the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Mana emertt District as lead agency that: A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment,and,therefore,an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly,this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment:,that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated,because of the following conditions which'will be required by the lead agency: There will,therefore,be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned,and,therefore,this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions(see 6 NYCRR 617A). ❑ C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment,and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s)and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly,this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities-Fishers Island Waste Management District Name of Lead Agency: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Beth Stern Title of Responsible Officer: Manager Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: ,lune 27,2018 Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer)" "' Date: ,lune 21,2018 'Prepared by GO Consulting,Inc.,as environmental consultant For Further Information: Attn:Kim Gennaro-Oancea,AICP CEP,President Contact Person:Fishers Island Waste Management District Address: P.O.Box 22,Fishers Island,NY 06390 Telephone Number:631-788-7455 E-mail:fiwastemanagement@gmall.com For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations,a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of.the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located(e.g.,Town/City/Village of) Other involved agencies(if any) Applicant(if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: luta:Hwwwrwv dee tay'goy/enb/ertb..html, PRINT FU Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD),as lead agency and the project sponsor,has caused to be prepared an Expanded Environmental Assessment(September 2017) (Expanded EA),and related plans, survey,technical facility and planning reports, site and area inspections, environmental investigations, and agency consultations. Based upon the aforesaid documents and consultations,the proposed action would have no or small impacts. There are no potential moderate to large impacts. -The subject property is within the boundaries of the New York State Coastal Area, and the Town of Southold has an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). A consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP policies was performed and included in the Expanded EA and separately within the Town of Southold LWRP Form dated December 5,2017. Based upon such analyses,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP and,therefore,will not have any significant adverse impacts to coastal resources. Impacton Load-Upon Implementation of the proposed action,the area of impervious surfaces would increase by 0,79:t acre. The total area of lawn and landscaping (includes the proposed stormwater basin) would increase by 0.88:t acre,with approximately 0.7 acre to be revegetated with an appropriate non-invasive,native groundco,ver seed mix and left unmaintained. The remaining 0.18±acre would include an area of evergreens to be planted,at the northern portion of the project site to serve as additional buffering to adjacent residential properties. The non-vegetated areas (comprised of exposed soills,primarily compacted) would decrease by 1,67 acres. There would lie no disturbance or alterations to the areas Of natural vegetation or wetlands found on the overall subject property. Approximately 2,4 acres of the 3,23±-acre project site would be disturbed,with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stormwater detention basin,mixing building and internal loop driveway. The area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would Increase by 15,289± sf (0.35±-acre), with a corresponding decrease of 8,266±sf(0.19±acre)for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023±sf(0.16±acre)for slopes greater than 15 percent However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprintand would not result in changes that could create the potential for runoffto surrounding areas of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanket on the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an area that is currently devoid of vegetation. The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the stormwater management basin,which would result in the beneficial impact of containing stormwater from a large area of the existing facility. Based upon the above analyses, no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd)with no projected change to the water demand. There is no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no increases in staff and no new systems proposed. The proposed action includes methods to collect and filter stormwater for reuse in on-site composting operations and the wash down of surfaces, and thus, a reduction in overall water demand is expected. Based upon an assessment of the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth in Article 4,Section 760-452(B) of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code(ECSC),included in the Expanded EA,the proposed action complies with the requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities As the proposed action would result in a minimal increase(0.79±-acre) in impervious surface,there would a minimal increase in stormwater runoff. The proposed drainage plan would accommodate stormwater from additional impervious surface area,in addition to areas within the project site that are developed or within operational areas. The proposed drainage plan includes a stormwater detention basin and the installation of subgrade infiltration units,as well as methods for stormwater reuse. Stormwater to be accommodated in the proposed detention,basin would be first filtered with a Stormceptor@(or similar)system before entering the basin. The proposed basin also includes overflow protection with a riprap spillway at Elevation 1.0. In cases of heavy storm events,stormwater would flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stormwater system located along the adjacent roadway. The proposed drainage plan also includes stormwater infiltration units to accommodate roof runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary design includes the use ofStormt ch SC-740@ collection chambers, whicb allow for optimal storage volumes in relatively small footprints, thus minimizing excavation, The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use as a solid waste management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which will cease upon implementation of the proposed action. The consolidated facility would receive and store wastes (municipal solid waste ["MSW'],cardboard,single- stream recyclables,scrap metal and bulky wastes)in designated containers or enclosed areas such that there is no potential for rainfall or surface runoff to interact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the piles from stormwater. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. Overall,the waste management practices at the facility are expected to mitigate any potential significant adverse impacts associated with surface flow. The FIWMD does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. The proposed stormwater detention basin and stormwater infiltration units would be constructed such that there is an adequate separation distance of, at minimum, four feet from the base of the basin and units to groundwater, in accordance with NYSDEC requirements for sole source aquifers. Based upon soil borings performed in areas of the project site, and the current development that exists on the project site, no soil. limitations associated with infiltration are expected. However,prior to construction, additional test borings will be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and,if required,soil mixing would be undertaken. The proposed action would also comply with Chapter 236 of the Town of Southold Town Code,which regulates stormwater management and discharge associated with land-disturbing activities and projects that involve a replacement of or addition to impervious surfaces. Overall,based on the current condition of the site(i.e.,without a formal stormwater management system),the proposed drainage improvements would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treatment The proposed stormwater management plan will comply with the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code,as well as the Deva York Standards and Spe ification for Erosioiland So-&-mt Sontr I(New York State Department of Environmental Conservation[NYSDEC],2016),and the New York State Storn per na,,p¢ eni nal (NYSDEC, 2015). As required,the FIWMD will file for coverage under both the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES)Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities(GP-0-12-001)and the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity(NYSDEC GP 0-15-002),which includes the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)and the filing of a Notice of Intent with the NYSDEC prior to construction. The SWPPP will include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities,as well as for post-construction stormwater management Such SWPPP will also comply with the requirements of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. Page 2 Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities There is a New York State-designated freshwater wetland of an approximate size of 1.1 acres located at the southwesterly portion of the subject property and to the west thereof,is an estuarine and marine wetland of approximately 0.76 acre in size included on the National Wetland Inventory. The subject property is also bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound and a limited area of tidal wetlands exists on the northwestern portion of the subject property. The proposed action will not occurwithin the regulated adjacent areas of New York State-designated freshwater or tidal wetlands. A Letter of No jurisdiction was issued by the NYSDEC on May 24,2018. Pursuant to§275-3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold(Chapter 275 of Town Code)are lands within 100 feet of any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland,beach, bluff,dune,flat,marsh,swamp,wet meadow,bog,vernal pool,creek, estuary, stream,pond,canal,lake,land under water,or land subject to tidal action;as well as all Town Waters. The proposed action does not include any disturbance or activities within 100 feet of any of the wetlands,waterbodies or areas above. Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas, the proposed action includes measures that would improve the existing site conditions. As described above, there are no stormwater management controls to contain stormwater on-site and to prevent runoff to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon implementation of the proposed action, stormwater would be captured and directed to stormwater infiltration units as well as collected, pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention basin. The placement of erosion control blankets at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff on areas that are currently devoid of vegetation. Overall,the proposed action would result in beneficial impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint Based upon the above,neither ground or surface water quality nor quantity would be significantly impacted by the proposed project. kn t on ffiggrianArcamalRe�o�s - There are no properties on Fishers Island listed or nominated for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, however, there are structures within Fort H.G.Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. The Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District is also eligible for listing. According to the Cultural Resources Information System of OPRHP, the subject property is also located within an archaeologically-sensitive area. Consultations were undertaken with the OPRHP. In correspondence dated June 29,2017,OPRHP advised there are no archaeological concerns. In correspondence dated August 4,2017,OPRHP indicated that"the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met:1.Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries;and 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction...Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright.The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline." In accordance with OPRHPs comments, the requested plans and specifications would be provided to OPRHP prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such,the proposed action would have no significant adverse impacts to historic resources. h=aCt on ��dMj bivironrnegatyLAr t property situated within two Critical Environmental --go is 5--The subjec prope Areas(CEAs) Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA. Both CEA's have their designations, as defined,"due to benefit to human health,&protect drinking water." The proposed action will comply with Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards,which were established to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. Also, the proposed action would establish stormwater controls, include methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from the public water supply would be reduced,and situates improvements on developed or disturbed areas,thus requiring no natural vegetation to be removed. As such, the environmental characteristics of the CEAs will not be impaired Page 3 Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance ofProjectlmpacis and Determination of Significance-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Imnact on Lrarrpartlrttorr - Upon implementation of the proposed action, the volume of waste requiring disposal off-Island would decrease and would, therefore, decrease the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. The proposed consolidation would also remove truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. The proposed action may result in an additional 9-to-12 car's in a peak hour,based upon FIWMD records for the current operations;however,this projection does not account for the resident or business delivering to the two sites on the same day. It can be expected that a resident or business selects a waste drop day when they travel to both the transfer station and compost station for disposal. Further,the transfer station is open only half-days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. Regarding parking,the proposed project will create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. Access to the subject property would remain in its current location, However, the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way,paved loop driveway for improved circulation. Overall, the proposed action will not result in significant adverse traffic or parking impacts. lrrct oraioise srfor nALJlrt Norse - The proposedimprovements would take place between 73I1 am to S: il pin during non-holiday weekdays and on a limited basis,would be undertaken on Saturdays. No construction would take place on. Sundays. The proposed development would generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction,truck movements,and heavy equipment operations, lleavymachineiy,such as front end loaders,graders,bulldozers,,and backhoes,would be used intermittently throughout the proposed project's construction, To mitigate construction-related noise impacts,the construction manager will oversee and prevent the idling of construction vehicles. Also, all construction equipment utilized on-site will be equipped with properly operating noise muffler systems. The FIWMD and/or construction manager will also respond to any noise complaints during construction. As such, no significant adverse construction noise impacts will result. With respect to noise impacts after development, the subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years and the activities to be undertaken upon implementation of the proposed action would not significantly alter the use of the property, The proposed project would not increase the number of equipment operational hours of the on-site wheeledloader and may actually result in a slight reduction in such operational hours since the project would involve the implementation of a covered compost system. Further, upon implementation of the proposed action, all source-separated materials would be handled inside the mixing building. A diesel-powered shredder is and would continue to operate outside to process logs and brush,with no changes to volumes expected as a result of the proposed action. Regarding the truck activity in the pick-up/drop off of containers,the project would result in a reduction in the number of off-Island truck trips, Although trucks would be concentrated at the compost site,all trucks are required to be compliant with over-the-road noise limits and the FIWMD staff are on-site to address any potential issues. Additionally,the trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contained within the site. 'It is also noted that the subject property is adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport As such, upon implementation of the proposed action,it is expected that the noise environment at the subject property would be similar to that under existing conditions. Overall,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse noise impacts. Odor-Upon implementation of the proposed action,the FIWMD would commence accepting source-separated organic waste from users of the facility,which wouldbe placed in the proposed mixing building,ground-up and. added to the composting mass, This would result in an overall reduction in the amount of putrescible material in the outbound MSW containers. The proposed composting operation would occur'inside'the mixing building, which would automatically maintain aerobic conditions;thereby,further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally,the composting approach would include a.full cover over the composting mass,with aeration of the pile automatically monitored and activated within, Such improvements modify the current practice of Page 4 Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities outdoor mixing and management,to indoor mixing and a cover system to protect and manage compost piles. Overall,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts associated with odors. Light-The proposed action includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings,and pole lighting on select perimeter areas,which would comply with the Town of Southold lighting standards(Chapter 172 of the Town Code). As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse lighting impacts. tigpacton Human Health Environmental Conditions-The FIWMD site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program - Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program. The FUDS program includes four categories,in which,based on available information and consultations with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the FIWMD was determined to be investigated under two of the four categories: (1) CON/I-ITRW (Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste), and (2) MMRP (Military Munitions Response Program). Both of these investigations are being led and implemented by the USACE. Fort H.G. Wright is also listed as a New York State (NYS) Inactive Waste Site (#152241). With respect to the CON/HTRW investigation, the USACE has advised the F1WMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and one transformer on the subject property. Based upon information provided by USACE,the six USTs and one transformer are 'located outside of the project area, and thus,the proposed improvements would not have an impact on these areas. Pursuant to the USACE in October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017;however,said work did not occur. The USACE has now advised of its plan to commence work in the summer of 2018. With respect to the MMRP investigation,the FIWMD caused an environmental investigation to be prepared (Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report dated January 2017, as prepared by PW Grosser Consulting, Inc) to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance (UXO), in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality. There is no reported history of UXO being found at the site; however, in 2007, the USACE recommended additional work on Fort H.G.Wright. The FIWMD is not aware of any additional investigations since the 2007 recommendation;however,the potential presence of UXO caused the FIWMD to undertake investigations. The environmental investigation included a geophysical investigation, which did not identify any subsurface anomalies in the vicinity of the former batteries. There were subsurface anomalies detected on the site,but given the locations,it is.not thought to be UXO. Nonetheless,the FIWMD would undertake additional activities prior to and during construction to minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering'UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UXO. Regarding the soil investigation,soil samples were collected from areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based upon the sampling results,there are no restrictions for reuse of soils on-site and no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel or users on the site. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action would not be expected to result in human health impacts. Modifications to Existing Solid Waste Management Facility-The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change:in total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes,and similar factors. Single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would result in an,increase in the amount of waste that can be composted and used on the Island,thus reducing the amount of waste required for transport and disposal off-Island. It is estimated that an additional 100±-to-150±tons of cardboard material,food waste,paper and MSW could be composted each year,which represents an approximately 14-to-20 percent waste reduction for traditional disposal. There would be also Page 5 Part -Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of ProjectImpacts and Determination of Significance-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities be a corresponding reduction in hauling and disposal costs. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling,composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State(New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.Beyond Waste. A Sustains ie M r� r &w York Stec. Adopted 12/27/2010) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States Environmental Protection Agency,U.S.EPA Sustainable Materials Management Program Stratt is Plan.l�iaqal. Year 2017 _2022. Oeto 2to improve waste management practices. Overall,the proposed action is expected to result in beneficial impacts to solid waste management Con,vistency with,Corrtmuni. P cans-The FIWMD is a special district established by the Town of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. In 1987, the subject property was transferred from the Town to the FIWMD for waste management services. For 30 years,the subject property has been used for such purpose. The proposed action would modernize the facility and not significantly change the intensity of use. Regarding land use plans,the Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 recognized the two main objectives of the proposed action,including (1) the desire of the FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost station property in order to reduce operating and staffing costs and improve efficiency, and (2) reducing the volume of garbage that is being shipped off the Island to reduce costs. A consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP policies was performed and based upon such analyses,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP. Page 6 William D. Moore Attorney at Law �; �.ti 1� 3 2018 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971Ssti�a➢d ' Tel: 631-765-4663 ;� P� rurflrq Bomd Fax: 631-765-4643 August 8, 2018 Donald Wilcenski, Chairman and Members of the Board Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District("FIWMD" or "District") SCTM 1000-12-1-1.1 Site Plan Dear Chairman Wilcenski and Members of the Board: I write asking the Planning Board to immediately undertake its site plan review of the Fishers Island Waste District capital improvement project on Fishers Island to combine the existing transfer station and composting facility to a single site, and to confirm my conversation with William Duffy, Town Attorney with respect to the site plan review. In October 2017 we met with Planning Staff member and the Town Attorney to confirm that the District agreed to have the site plan reviewed by the Planning Board. The District agreed to this review process even though the District is a special municipal district recognized under New York law, and that a compelling legal argument can be made that the District is not subject to site plan review. In furtherance of the District's consent to engage in the site plan review process with the Planning Board, the site plan and full drawings were submitted many months ago. To date, it is our understanding that the Board has not yet reviewed the submission. There appears to be a belief that a "Notice of Disapproval" is required before the Planning Board can or will undertake a site plan review. This is not the case, and we have confirmed as much with the Town Attorney who has confirmed that he has, or will advise you to proceed with the site plan review process in accordance with the legal principles set forth in the Monroe County case analysis. Insistence upon receipt of a piece of paper from the building department is unnecessary. The District has voluntarily agreed to participate in a town planning board site plan review of its municipal project and asks the Planning Board to undertake its site plan review immediately. Further delay acts only to increase the costs of this project. William D. Moore Attorney at Law Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District Site plan August 7, 2018 We look forward to an expeditious review of this municipal capital improvement project which is of great importance to the residents of Fishers Island. Kindly advise when this matter will be taken up by the Board for its review and action. Vel yo rs, h Wilfi�1111 Moore WDM/mr cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney Fishers Island Waste Management District Board of Commissioners Hon. Scott Russell, Town Supervisor Michael Verity, Chief Town Building Inspector Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O.Box 22 Fishers Island,NY 06390JUL2 2018 Tele 631-788-7455 ouch d Town PW'inin Board Gregory Thibodeau,Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Meredith Doyen Bruce Hubert Date: June 28, 2018 To: All Involved and/or Interested Agencies From: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Re: State Environmental Quality Review Act—Determination of Non-Significance Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue, Fishers Island Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Enclosed herein is the Notice of Determination of Non-Significance (Negative Declaration) for the Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities, which was adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District, as lead agency, on June 27, 2018. Also enclosed are Parts 2 and 3 of the Environmental Assessment Form. Sincerely, Beth A. Stern cc: W. Moore, Esq. State Environmental Quality Review Act Notice of Determination of No n-Sign ificance Negative Declaration Name of Action: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Project Location: Fishers Island Waste Management District 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York Project Sponsor: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Lead Agency: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Date: June 27,2018 ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This notice is issued pursuantto Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law(State Environmental Quality Review Act[SEQRA])and the implementing regulations therefor at 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(hereinafter,the"FIWMD"),as lead agency,has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment,and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement( IS) will notbe prepared. Such determination is based upon the following: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form; 2. Expanded Environmental Assessment(September 2017),as prepared by KGO Consulting,Inc; 3. Consolidated Facilities Planning Report (last revised February 2016), as prepared by Project Management Associates,LLC, 4. Waste Control Plan (May 2016),as prepared by Project Management Associates,LLC; S. Site development plans,as prepared by Anchor Engineering Services Inc, 6. Topographic Map (last revised May 10, 2018), as prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying&Architecture,PLLC, 7. Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report (January 2017), as prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting; 8. Consultations with and determinations from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation( PP),New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYC),and the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA); 9. Coordination and consultations with the Town of Southold;and 10. Site and area inspections, SEQRA Classification. Unlisted Description of Action: The FIWMD is a special district established by the Town of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management services to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties - (1) a transfer station and (2) a compost station and receiving facility for various wastes and select reusable items. The proposed action includes the consolidation of the two facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility,which would allow the FIWMD to manage all of its services and operations at one site and,as part of the proposed action,implement improvements thatwould modernize its current operations to industry standards,including programs to reduce disposal volumes. Also included are safety and site repairs,drainage improvements,and improvements to site security. Negadvc Declaration Fisher. Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities, Specifically,the project includes the following; Er a tl"5 Nr sla U-L) �_VJ)"I'g.An2aa • Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. • Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes from users. • Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers) for scrap metal and bulky wastes. • Relocation of a 240-square-foot(so modular building from the existing transfer station to the project site for use in collecting residential E-waste, discarded small maintenance equipment[e.g., mowers, trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. • Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others(i.e.,a proposed swap shop). GmrwomtLng_Qpr8janq 0 Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered building for the purpose of processing and mixing organics for composting. The proposed"mixing building"would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway, opposite the MSW receiving areas. Within the mixing building would be a one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste, cardboard and other fibers, and a reinforced concrete bin wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. a Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration, moisture control by protecting piles from stormwater,and leachate collection. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. • Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building to be situated adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building, the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed, • Replacement and reinforcement of the existing concrete bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guardrails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standards, • The deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations would be demolished and the areas would be backfilled with soil and compacted. • Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. • Improvements to site security, including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter,swing gates at the entry,site lighting and security cameras. • Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the creation of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop off areas. • Installation of a stormwater detention basin,stormwater infiltration units,as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. Page Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD is proposing to add to the property it owns(and uses)by entering into a lease for a small portion of land owned by the Town. The proposed lease is for 2.7± acres of land that currently includes the site access,the internal paved driveway,attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area. In exchange for the lease of 2.7±acres of land from the Town of Southold,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. Upon implementation of the lease agreements, the compost station property(with the proposed transfer station operations) would be 10.76±acres(9.33±acres + 2.7± acres = 1.27± acres); however, the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23± acres (hereinafter,the"project site"or"project area"),inclusive of the facility area currently within the Town-owned property. Upon implementation of the proposed action, the lease of the 1.44-acre parcel occupied by the transfer station would terminate. Site History Prior to the FIWMD waste management operations,the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part of the larger Fort H.G.Wright. An approximately 412-acre,U.S.military training and coastal defense facility established in the late 1890's, Fort H.G. Wright included 12 gun emplacements, small arms ranges, administration buildings,housing,and an airfield, The subject property was part of a larger coastal artillery station located along the westernmost portion of Fort H.G.Wright. Five batteries for various types of artillery were placed on the subject property. These batteries included gun emplacements,subgrade concrete bunkers for the purposes of resource movement and communications, and lookout posts. Remnants of the batteries and one lookout post exist today. In the mid-century,Fort H.G.Wright was closed and the land was transferred to various entities,including the U.S.Coast Guard,the U.S. Navy,the Fishers Island Union Free School District, and the Town of Southold. In 1987, the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD for the purpose of providing solid waste management operations to the Island's residents and businesses. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold, the subject property was used for the burning of brush, construction debris and other materials (other than household garbage). In the early 1990's,the burning of materials was phased out and the current practices and program were introduced. Reasons Supporting this Determination of Non-Significance: In accordance with SEQRA and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617,the FIWMD,using the EAF and Expanded EA and other relevant information cited herein, and comparing same with the thresholds set forth in 6 NYCRR§§617.4 and 617.5,has determined that this project is an Unlisted Action. Coordinated review was conducted with the NYSDEC,Suffolk County Planning Commission,Town of Southold Town Board,Office of the Town Attorney and Planning Board. Based upon the information contained in the EAF and Expanded EA,site development plans,facility planning and waste management reports,environmental investigations,consultations with NYSDEC,OP, FAA,and USACE,coordination and consultations with the Town of Southold,and area and site inspections,the FIWMD, as lead agency for the action contemplated herein,and after due deliberation,review and analysis of proposed action,the above-described documents,consultations and inspections, and the criteria set forth in 6 NYCRR §617.7, hereby determines that the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts to the environment This determination is supported by the following: I. Gi=n.cLwate r.and 5.1,Lrface_Wzter_Q,"1V juxLQuativ - Upon implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd) from its separate facilities (i.e., transfer station and compost station) with no projected change to the water demand. There is also no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no increases in staff and no new systems proposed. Upon implementation of the proposed measures to reuse a portion of the collected and filtered stormwater for on-site composting operations and the wash down of surfaces,a reduction in overall water demand is expected. Based upon an assessment of the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth in Article 4, Page 3 Negative Derlaradon rishers Island Wasle Ma nagement Astnct Proposed Consohdaborh of Waste Management Facilities ....................... Section 760-452(6)of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSC),the proposed action complies with the requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. The proposed stormwater detention basin is to be designed to an approximate top elevation of 14±-to-16±feet amsI and a base elevation of seven feet amsI,thus providing four feet of separation to groundwater (based upon a groundwater elevation of three feet amsl). The proposed infiltration units would be located at a ground elevation of approximately 21 feet ams]with the bottom of the infiltration units set at approximately 17 feet amsl, which would provide an approximate separation distance of 14 feet between the base of the units and groundwater. Accordingly,there is adequate depth provided for the filtration of stormwater. The proposed stormwater management plan is designed to pretreat and accommodate stormwater from an existing facility that currently does not have formal areas for recharge. The subject property is located within a designated sole source aquifer, and thus, the proposed stormwater detention basin is designed such that there will be a minimum four-foot separation distance to groundwater. The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use as a solid waste management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which will cease upon implementation of the proposed action. The proposed action also includes stormwater infiltration units to accommodate roof runoff from the mixing building. The proposed stormwater management plan will comply with the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code,as well as the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [NYSDEC], 2016), and the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYSDEC, 2015). As required,prior to undertaking construction,the FIWMD will file for coverage under both the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (GP-0-12-001) and the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (NYSDEC GP 0-15-002), which includes the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)and the filing of a Notice of Intent with the NYSDEC prior to construction. The SWPPP will include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities,as well as for post-construction stormwater management Such SWPPP will also comply with the requirements of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. The consolidated facility is designed to receive and store wastes(municipal solid waste["MSW'], cardboard,single-stream recyclables,scrap metal and bulky wastes) in designated containers or enclosed areas such that rainfall would not come into contact with waste products. Compost piles will be placed on concrete pads and a cover system with leachate collection is proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. The FIWMD does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. There is a New York State-designated freshwater wetland of an approximate size of 1.1 acres located atthe southwesterly portion of the subject property and to the westthereof,is an estuarine and marine wetland, of approximately 0.76 acre in size included on the National Wetland Inventory. The subject property is also bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound and a limited area of tidal wetlands exists on the northwestern portion of the subject property. The proposed action will not occur within the regulated adjacent areas of New York State- designated freshwater or tidal wetlands. A Letter of No jurisdiction was issued by the NYSDEC on May 24,2018. Pursuant to§275-3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold (Chapter 275 of Town Code) are lands within 100 feet of any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland,beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, vernal pool, creek, estuary, Page 4, Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities stream, pond, canal,lake, land under water, or land subject to tidal action; as well as all Town Waters. The proposed action does not include any disturbance or activities within 100 feet of any of the wetlands,waterbodies or areas above. Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas,the proposed action includes measures that would improve the existing site conditions. Currently,there are no stormwater management controls to contain stormwater on-site and to prevent runoff to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon implementation of the proposed action, stormwater would be captured and directed to stormwater infiltration units as well as collected, pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention basin. The placement of erosion control blankets at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff on areas that are currently devoid of vegetation. Furthermore,the proposed concrete block gravity wall relies on the weight of the blocks for stability and,therefore,the space required for a gravity wall is less than other systems thus reducing disturbance. Overall, therefore, the proposed action would result in beneficial impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint. Based upon the above, neither groundwater quantity or quality or surface water quality will be significantly impacted by the proposed project 2. . ...... . The subject property is within the boundaries of the New York State Coastal Area,and the Town of Southold has an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP). Based upon a consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP. The property is also not located within a floodplain,and thus,the proposed action would not increase flooding potential. Accordingly,no significant adverse impacts to coastal resources would be expected. Approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed, with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stormwater detention basin, mixing building and internal loop driveway. The area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would increase by 15,289± sf(0.35±-acre),with a corresponding decrease of 8,266±sf(0.19±acre)for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023±sf(0.16±acre) for slopes greater than 15 percent However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprint and would not result in changes that could create the potential for runoff to surrounding areas of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanketon the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an area that is currently devoid of vegetation, The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the stormwater management basin, which would result in the beneficial impact of containing stormwater from a large area of the existing facility. Based upon the above analyses,no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. 4. Lrosion and Fba—aling-The proposed action would result in a minimal increase (0.79±-acre) in impervious surface, which would result in a minimal increase in stormwater runoff. The proposed drainage plan would accommodate stormwater from additional impervious surface area,in addition to areas within the project site that are developed or within operational areas. Specifically, a stormwater detention basin and subgrade infiltration units are proposed. Stormwater to be accommodated in the proposed detention basin would be first filtered with a Stormceptor@ (or similar) system before entering the basin. The proposed basin also includes overflow protection with a riprap spillway at Elevation 10. In cases of heavy storm events, stormwater would flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stormwater system located along the adjacent roadway. Page 5 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management DisIxict Proposed Consolidation of Waste Managernent Facilities The proposed stormwater infiltration units would accommodate roof runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary design includes the use of Stormtech SC-740(D collection chambers,which allow for optimal storage volumes in relatively small footprints,thus minimizing excavation. The consolidated facility would receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed areas such that there is no potential for rainfall or surface runoff to interact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the piles from stormwater. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. Overall,the waste management practices atthe facility are expected to mitigate the potential adverse impacts associated with surface flow and waste areas. The proposed stormwater detention basin and stormwater infiltration units would be constructed such that there is an adequate separation distance of,at minimum,four feet from the base of the basin and units to groundwater, in accordance with NYSDEC requirements for sole source aquifers. Based upon soil borings; performed in areas of the project site, and the current development that exists on the project site, no soil limitations are expected. However, prior to construction,additional test borings will be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and,if required,soil mixing would be undertaken. Overall,based on the current condition of the site(i.e., without a stormwater management system),the proposed drainage improvements would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treatment. The proposed action would also comply with Chapter 236 of the Town of Southold Town Code, which regulates stormwater management and discharge associated with land-disturbing activities and projects that involve a replacement of or addition to impervious surfaces. Prior to and during construction,erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place such thatthe potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities will be minimized. The erosion and sedimentation controls and methods by which stormwater would be accommodated during construction would be designed to be consistent with New York State standards and manuals and the Town of Southold stormwater management regulations set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code. The property is not located within a floodplain,and thus,the proposed action would not increase flooding potential. Based on the above, implementation of the proposed action will not result in any substantial increase in the potential for leaching or drainage problems,erosion,or flooding. S. Upon implementation of the proposed action, the volume of waste requiring disposal off-island would decrease,therefore decreasing the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. The proposed consolidation would also remove truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. The proposed action may resultin additional 9-to-12 cars in a peakhour;however,this projection does not account for the resident or business delivering to the two sites on the same day. It can be expected that resident or business selects a waste drop day when they travel to both the transfer station and compost station for disposal. Further,the transfer station is open only half-days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. Regarding parking, the proposed project will create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. Access to the subject property would remain in its current location. However, the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way, paved loop driveway for improved circulation. Overall, the proposed action will not result in significant adverse traffic or parking impacts. 6. AiL-QuaUly-The proposed action will reduce the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and drop-off and will not result in a significant increase in patron traffic.The subject property is an existing solid waste facility accessed via Whistler Avenue and 0.2 mile from the ferry Page 6 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities dock,and thus,no vehicle delays would be expected. As such,there would be no increase in air emissions associated with traffic or vehicle idling. Further, no new significant air emissions sources are proposed. The proposed composting cover system would protect piles, thus minimizing the potential for dust and windborne sediment With respect to air quality during construction,land surfaces disturbed during construction would be paved or planted as soon as practicable following disturbance,thereby minimizing the potential for the generation of fugitive dust. Additionally,during dry periods,a water truck would be brought to the site for the wetting of soils to further minimize dust. Excessive idling of construction equipment or vehicles would notbe permitted. Accordingly,no significant adverse changes in existing air quality are expected to result during construction. Overall,based upon the above, no significant adverse changes in existing air quality will result upon implementation of the proposed action. 7. Mu-The proposed improvements would take place between 7:30 am to 5:30 pm during non- holiday weekdays and on a limited basis would be undertaken on Saturdays. No construction would take place on Sundays. The proposed development would generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction, truck movements, and heavy equipment operations. Heavy machinery, such as front-end loaders, graders, bulldozers, and backhoes, would be used intermittently throughout the proposed project's construction. To mitigate construction-related noise impacts,the construction manager will oversee and prevent the idling of construction vehicles. In addition,all construction equipment utilized on-site will be equipped with properly operating noise muffler systems. The FIWMD and/or construction manager will also respond to any noise complaints during construction. As such, no significant adverse construction noise impacts will result. With respect to noise impacts after development, the subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years and the activities to be undertaken upon implementation of the proposed action would not significantly alter the use of the property. The subject property is also adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport. The proposed project would not increase the number of equipment operational hours of the on-site wheeled loader and may actually result in a slight reduction in such operational hours since the project would involve the implementation of a covered compost system. Further, upon implementation of the proposed action, all source- separated materials would be handled inside the mixing building. A diesel-powered shredder is and will continue to operate outside to process logs and brush. Regarding the truck activity,the project would result in a slight reduction in the number of off-Island truck trips. Although trucks would be concentrated at the compost site,all trucks are required to be compliant with over-the- road noise limits and the FIWMD staff are on-site to address any potential issues. Additionally,the trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contained to the site. As such,upon implementation of the proposed action,the noise environment at the subject property would be similar to that under existing conditions. Overall,the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse noise impacts. B. Qd-Qr - Upon implementation of the proposed action, the FIWMD would commence accepting source-separated organic waste from users of the facility,which would be placed in the proposed mixing building,ground-up and added to the composting mass. This would result in an overall reduction in the amount of putrescible material in the outbound MSW containers. The proposed composting operation would occur inside the mixing building, which would maintain aerobic conditions; thereby, further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally,the composting approach would include a full cover over the composting mass, with aeration of the pile automatically monitored and activated within. Such improvements modify the current practice of outdoor mixing and management, to indoor mixing and a cover system to protect and manage Page 7 Negartdve Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation ofWaste Management Faciiitiet> compost piles. Overall,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts associated with odors. 9. The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes, and similar factors. Single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted and used on the Island,thus reducing the amount of waste required for transport and disposal off-Island. It is estimated that an additional 100±-to-150± tons of cardboard material,food waste,paper and MSW could be composted each year,which represents an approximately 14-to-20 percent waste reduction for traditional disposal. There would be also be a corresponding reduction in hauling and disposal costs. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling, composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, A. .y j:-4 ;r�i l p �Ja .n �. " St;� e. Adopted 12/27/2010) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States Environmental Protection Agency,l,5" ';, us. db .Ma '�.�...� � ''w October 2015)to improve waste management practices. Overall, based upon the above,no significant adverse impacts would occur. Rather,the proposed action is expected to result in beneficial impacts to solid waste management 10 Na=pl Cummw1 ,-The proposed action is to occur within an operational area of an existing solid waste management facility thathas occupied the subject property for 30 years. Theproposed action would not include the removal of any native or natural vegetation,and includes stormwater management controls to accommodate stormwater runoff generated within the project site. The proposed slope stabilization measures, including seeding areas with native, non-invasive plantings and installation of erosion control blankets,would protect areas outside the project site, including areas of natural vegetation,wetlands and surface waters. Overall,the proposed action would not include the removal or destruction of vegetation or fauna; would not substantially interfere with the movement of any resident or migratory species; and would not impact threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the associated habitats. As such, no significant adverse impacts to natural resources would be expected upon implementation of the proposed action. 11. -The subject property is situated within two Critical Environmental Areas(CEAs) --Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA. Both CEA's have their designations,as defined,"due to benefitto human health&protect drinking water." The proposed action will comply with the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards, which were established to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. Also, the proposed action would establish stormwater controls, include methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from the public water supply would be reduced,and situates improvements on developed or disturbed areas,thus requiring no natural vegetation to be removed. As such, the environmental characteristics of the CEAs will not be impaired 12 &W19- m&LCJaracJLL-There are no properties on Fishers Island listed or nominated for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places;however,there are structures within Fort H.G. Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. The Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic Districtis also eligible forlisting. Accordingto the Cultural Resources Information System Page 8 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities of OP ,the subject property is also located within an archaeological-sensitive area. However, in correspondence dated June 29,2017,OPRHP advised there are no archaeological concerns. Regarding historic resources, in correspondence dated August 4, 2017, OPRHP indicated the following: "the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met:1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries, and 2.A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction.-Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose ofour review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline." In accordance with OPRHP's comments,the requested plans and specifications would be provided to OPRP prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such,the proposed action would have no significant adverse impacts to historic resources. The overall visual character of the subject property is that of a solid waste management facility. The proposed action would not alter the topography or vegetative buffers that exist between Fox Lane and the project site. The proposed design situates the mixing building and composting pads at the westerly portion of the facility, where there is adequate land area and is furthest from residential properties. It is expected that portions of the mixing building would be visible from the site entrance,however,the visual changes are not expected to be significant The FIWMD is also proposing to maintain the existing perimeter vegetation as well as to establish an area of evergreens along the northern area of the project site (adjacent to the operating area) for the purposes of providing a visual buffer from residential properties to the northeast of the facility. Based upon the FAA review of the building elevations, the proposed action would not pose a hazard to the Elizabeth Field airport Overall,implementation of the proposed action would not result in the impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The proposed action includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings,and pole lighting on select perimeter areas,which would comply with the Town of Southold lighting standards (Chapter 172 of the Town Code),and is subject to the review and approval of the Town Building Department As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse lighting impacts. 13. J;Ilgygy_R , (; -The proposed action will not result in a major change in the quantity or type , , pw _gg of energy used. 14. Public Health lm -The FIWMD site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program-Formerly Used Defense Sites(FURS)program. The FUDS program includes four categories, in which, based on available information and consultations with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),the FIWMD was determined to be investigated under two of the four categories:(1)CON/HTRW(Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste), and (2) MMRP(Military Munitions Response Program). Both of these investigations are being led and implemented by USACE. Fort H.G.Wright is also listed as a New York State (NYS) Inactive Waste Site (#152241). With respect to the CON/HTRW investigation, the USACOE has advised the FIWMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and one transformer on the subject property. Based upon information provided by USACOE, the six USTs and one transformer are located outside of the project area. Pursuant to the USACOE in October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017;however,said work did not occur. The USACOE has now advised of its plan to commence work in the summer of 2018. Page 9 Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Managerrwnt District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities With respect to the MMRP investigation,the FIWMD caused an environmental investigation to be prepared to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance(UXO) in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality. There is no reported history of UXO being found at the site;however,in 2007,the US Army Corps of Engineers recommended additional work on Fort H.G.Wright. The FIWMD is not aware of any additional investigations since the 2007 recommendation; however, the potential presence of UXO caused the FIWMD to undertake investigations. The environmental investigation included a geophysical investigation, which did not identify any subsurface anomalies in the vicinity of the former batteries. There were subsurface anomalies detected on the site,but given the locations, it is not thought to be UXO. Notwithstanding, the FIWMD would undertake additional activities prior to and during construction to minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UXO. Regarding the soil investigation,soil samples were collected from areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based upon the sampling results, there are no restrictions for reuse of soils on-site and no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel or users on the site. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in the creation of a hazard to human health, 15. ' ,an ,!2 Qf JJso or -There are no changes to the current land use as a solid waste management facility. The proposed action would not significantly change the intensity of use,as the services on-site would be altered to include the receiving of municipal solid waste and recyclables in four compactor boxes,while modernizing the activities performed on-site. As such, the proposed action will not substantially change the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural,open space or recreational resources,or in its capacity to support existing uses. 16. Y s - The FIWMD is a special __anA_Um,sdsW,n.q widi district established by the Town of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. In 1987,the subject property was transferred from the Town to the FIWMD for waste management services. For 30 years,the subject property has been used for such purpose. Regarding land use plans,the Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 recognized the two main objectives of the proposed action, including: (1)the desire of the FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost station property in order to reduce operating and staffing costs and improve efficiency; and (2) reducing the volume of garbage that is being shipped off the Island to reduce costs. A consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP was performed determined to be consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP. As such, the proposed action will not create a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. 17., CaxLwt Llm1w_c1,ng_Jinpu_M-The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and no changes are projected upon implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes,and similar factors. Accordingly, the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse growth-inducing impacts. 18. The proposed action will not create a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above-discussed consequences, 19. C=kdaJweJ1,11gag - Implementation of the proposed action will not result in changes in two or _Ls more elements of the environment,no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a significant adverse impact on the environment Further, Pagelo Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities implementation of the proposed action will not result in cumulative impacts that would meet any of the criteria set forth at 6 NYCRR§617.7. For Further Information. ContactPerson: Beth Stern Address: Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O.Box 22 Fishers Island,New York 06390 Email: fiwastemanagement@gmail.com Telephone o.: (631) 788-7455 Mage.I.I Negative Declaration Fishers Island Waste Man agement District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities A copy of this Determination is being sent to: Town of Southold Town Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold,Office of the Town Attorney,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold Planning Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Ms. Carrie Meek Gallagher, Director, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Mr.Jim Wade,P.E.,Environmental Engineer 2,Division of Materials Management,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Sherri Aicher, Environmental Analyst,Division of Environmental Permits,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Beth A.Cumming,Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator,NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation,Division for Historic Preservation,P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12888-0189 Suffolk County Planning Commission,H.Lee Dennison Building- 11th Floor, 100 Veterans Memorial Highway, P.O.Box 6100,Hauppauge,New York 11788-0099 Page 12 AgtTwy(he Oniily R(appfiathlit) Fall Environmental Assessment Form project: 12 D-"kkfim of Fawites IMPa Part 2-Identykation of Potential PrOjeet CJS Date! Part 7 is to he completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is des4rned to,help the lead agency in ventory al I pate dal,resnorces that could be affected by a proposed pinject or actimi. We reoognize that the lead agency's,rtvicwerl will riot necessarily be environmLlital professiorval& So,the questions are designed tD walk a reviewer 1hrough the assessment process by providing a scrics Pf qnostions that can be answemd using the inibrination found in Pad 1. To further assist the tend agency in cornpleling Part 2,the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part I that will provide the information needed toanswer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is coulpleled,the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area,complete the Coastal Assessment F® before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for compledug Part 2® * Review all of the information provided in Part I * Review any application,maps,supporting materials and the Full EF Workbook. * Answer each of the 18 questions in Pan 2, * if you answer"Yes"to a numbered question,please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer"No"to a numbered question,move on to the next numbered queWon. • Check apprt:)priate ooltonn to indicate the anticipated size of the impact, a Prupost%l projects that would exceed a nutneric threshold containcd in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box"Moderate to large impact may occur." ® The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis, a if you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact,it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. ® When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity,that is,the"whole action", 0 Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts, a Answer die,quostion,in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of Lke YLoecLj............................. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on,or physical alteration of, NO g]YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1.D.1) "Yes", ans-wer_eestions.g.,-1. ff �, mo�ve q!7 to Section 2. No,or Mad �iie Relevant to 12 e A, 4�, 1,All 1, ' :�, _ Part I $mRI1 v impact may Question(s) impact lk .mm 11,�"'(V r 0(4uj" ........ y a.The proposed action may involve construction on Land where depth to water table is 132d less than 3 fect. b®The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15%or greater. Eff ............ c.The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed,or E 2a 1Z generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d.T'he proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons 132a Of natural Material- e.The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Die El I or in rnultiple phases._____ f.The proposed action may result in increased erosion,whether from physical Me,D2q El disturbance orvagetation removal including from fiwtmenty herbicides). &The proposed action is,or may be,located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. 1r.......... h.Other impacts:1q21rcposed action would result in an atter on of land type coverages. .......... Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features 1'he proposed action may result in them ifiic tion or destruction of,or inhibit access to,any uniquo or unusual land forms on the site(e.g.,cliffs,dunes, YES minerals,fossils,caves). (See Part 1. .E.1g) if"Yes", ans1wer 4 uesflons Lr C 0 7TIOVE OY7 ZO Seadem 3 a y¢r i � ar w � - s i ' Q Relevant 0,OC ModerateK v Hf Part I small to large t Question(s) impact impact may f .'P, itI i�wP � ik r" � �` , 67a OCCnr OCCur a.Jdentify the specific land form(s)attached: .m B2g 0 ❑ b.The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a Bac 0 registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: C. Other Impacts: 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water bodies(e.g.,streams,rivers,ponds or lakes). (See Part 1,D.2, .21) `' les , n swee q ttesdons a w 1. "No move on to Section 4. Relevant No or Moderate , �„ Part I small to large "a '�; dao,, Rp' ffl'off'f Iu° IV 'Y t S r q1 1 Question(s) impact impact may OCeur occur a.The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b,Dlh b.The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10%or more than a D2b 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface am of arry body of water, c,The proposed actiotL may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a 0 { from a wetland or water body. d.The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h tidal wetland,or in the W or banks of any other water body. e.The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody,either from upland erosion, D2a,D2h off or by disturbing om sediments. t:The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s)for withdrawal D2c 0CSN of water from surface water, g.The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s)for discharge D of wastewater to surface water(s). h.The proposed action may cause soil erosion,or oth erwise create a source of D2e stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water h ies_ i.The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies widdn or E2h. 0 downstream of the site of the proposed action. j.The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q,E2h around any water body. k.The proposed action may require the construction of new,or expansion of existing, Dla,D wastewater treatmentfaciliti Page 2 of 1.0 ............ .. .................. .......... 1.Other impacts: ........... ........... ......................__............. 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or E]NO ZYFS may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1.D.2.a,D.2.c,D.2.d,D.2.p,D.2.q,D.2.t) Yes 91 nswer qteavienis a- .f '"No", move on to Section 5, J Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large P', QUeStiOU(S) impact iMpaCt may 1, 0, JTMIY—OCU r ----TL�Cull a.The proposed action may require new water supply wells,or create additional demand D2c 0 #es �exlsti�gwatc!.Sul"..ly wells. I I b.Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safia and sustainable D2c 0 withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: c.The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in arm without water and 171 a,D20 0 C1 sewer services® . ........ .... d.The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater, D2d,E21 e.The proposed action may-result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c,Elt 0 where groundwater is,or is suspected to be,contaminated. Elg,Elh f The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chentical products 132p,E21 over ground water or an aquifer. g.The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h,D2% E] feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21,D2c h. Other impacts: MMp station property. A stormwater basin Is proposed to accommodate and recharge ......................................................... ................. 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding, [ONO YF S (See Part 1®&2) "Yes", ansiveLEz�esfions a- ove on to Section 6. _1Y ..................................... Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large -W� VI" Question(s) impact impact may T q- U:,� _c� a.The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. Eli 0 b.The proposed action may result!it development within a 100 year floodplain. F2j c.The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k d.The proposed action may result in,or require,modification of existing drainage D2b,D2e patterns. e.Ile proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute toflooding. D2b,132i, ........... f.If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action,is the dam in need of repair, Ele ortale del ——1-.-........................ ............. Page 3 of 10 g® Other impacts, �.... . . ...... ra ❑ _. .. _m ... ._......... 6. Impacts on Air .-... .. .........___ ._.�. The proposed action may include a State regulated air emission source. ZNO YES (See Part 1. ® ,f., ,2,h,D.2.g) }es arzswcr uettararat� If"No ", move on to Section 7. W - j V11;, ReW t No,or Moderate I e ` YPa } ' �' �� rt I small to large k esl%..on(s) act impact may .w _W a ur occur . .......... it.If the proposed action retldaires federal or state air emission permits,the action may also emil one or more greenhouse gases at or aNwe the following levels: i. N lost,than 1000 Wnslyear of carbon dioxide(t OI)ii D2g M 13 il, More than 3.5 lowy'yoar of nitrons oxide( 1�, ) 2g ❑ 11 iii. More than t000 tonsrycar of carbon equivalent ofperfluort�etar°hosts ll�l"'f ',� D2 ❑ ❑ iv.More than °045 Ions/year of"sulfur hexafluoride('SF5) D2g ❑ ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g ❑ n yroc oroflorocarbos( Cs)emissions vi.43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ❑ n .T e proposed action.may generate 10 tons/your or more of any one designated D2gn ❑ hazardous air pollutant,or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air polIut ts. c.The proposed tion a require a state air re istrdtion _ , y g ,or may produce an emissions 2f, ra 0 rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs.per hour,or may include a heat source capable of s lu uti mo than10 million B 's ser hour, _ d.The proposed action may reach 50%of any of the thresholds in"a"through"g ", g c D2 ❑ above. e.The proposed action may result in the combustion or the al treatment of more than I D2s co ❑ ton of refuse weer hour. f.Other impacts:. ❑ ❑ 7. Impact on is i is The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (Sec Part 1.E.2.m.-q.) ONO E1yFS lf"'Yes"°, crnvIver questions a- °"7717-1-1-7 71111- , ��` o",move o to.Section 8. r -a state Part I smalr e , t od 1 Question(s) impact pact may �, V a tna occur ocxur m a.The proposed acfion may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any Ego threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York Stale or the Federal ®_ ovearrncnl,that use the site,or are fo tin,over,or nearthe site. .The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by Ego ❑ ❑ any rare,fteatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the federal governn crit c° a proposed action y causereductioni population,or loss of individ Is,of any E2p tri In species of special concern,or conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal Lwagi hent,that use the site,or are found on,aver,or near the-site, d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ❑ _ :n ] any species of special concern and conservation need,aslisted by New York State or te Federal government. Page 4 of 10 c.The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c res 0 Landmark to support the biological cornmullity it was established to protect. f.The proposed action may result in the removal of,or ground disturbance in,any E2n U Ll portion of a designated significant natural communiV. Source: g.The proposed;; may substantially interfere with Westin ceding,foraging,or ovei-winlering habitat for the predominant species that.occupy or use the project site. h.The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, Elb grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type&inibrmation soirr= ................- L Proposed action(commercial,industrial or recreational projects,only)involves use of D2q 0 a herbicides or pesticides. —--------– - Other ..................................... ......---- ........... 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1, .3.a. and ®) WINO []YES If"Yes", answer,guastions a-h. ff "No move on iuqecfion 9. 7, ..................... Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to Is rge Question(s) impact impact may _O�pqr occur a.The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group I through 4 of the F2c,Ob i 0 NYS Land Classification System. b.The proposed action may sever,cross or otherMse limit access to agricultural land Ela,E r, (includes cropland,hayficids,past"ure,vuac asdz,arahard,.StEj........ c.The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b activF_agricqLtural land. d.The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb,E3a 13 uses,either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District,or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District .......... e.'The proposed action may disrupt or preVBnt installation of an agricultural land El a,EIb El 0 rrianagenicat system. f The proposed action may result,directly or indirectly,in increased development C2c,C3, 0 C] potential or pressure on farmland. D2c,D2d g.The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c to Protection Plan. ................................ Page 5 of 10 9. Impact o Aest .. . ......... _. �_ - .....- s0 s The land use of the proposed action are obviously different frorn,or are in ONO sharp contrast to,current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1.E.La,E,Lb,,E.31.) answer ctlrr No' mai to Section 1 �� Relevant No.or CA to " �' Part I small to large �fi " ti �� Question(s) impact Impact may 1 maoccw• occur a.Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal,state,or local E3h 0 ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. .The proposed action Yresult in the obstruction, elimination or significant IE3h,C2b 0 M greening of one or more aailrr esigr,,atea scenic views. G.711c proposed action anaay be visible from pubtiely afumsisihle vantage points: E3 ... ...... __ i.Seasranaally°(e.,g,,seteett by`:hummer f alirage,but visible during other seasons) c u a it Year round � ❑ �.. .._-. ........ �..,....�................ d.The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: i Routine tnivel lry rosidents,including travel to and from work 2q' Ii.Recreational or Untrism based activities Etc ra ❑ m................. ... I ❑ e.The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E31i ra r.t appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. .. �..._..................�o_ f There are similar projects visible i the following distance of 1 a proposed Dla,Ela, � ❑ project: Dlf,Dlg -112 mile %z-3 agile 3-5 mile 5+ mile ,g,tither impacts: ❑ r 10. Impact on Historic d Archeological _......°. ... c o icl cg The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO YES resource. (Part 1. .3.e,f. and g.) Yes s wer araraaa a e. '1Vo . go to Section 11 u � ` � •� ' . ' " t e Part I _ small to large Question(s) impact impact may F r itls occur ... occur a.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3e [] to,any buildings,archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Boardof Mstofic Preservation for inclusion on the State or Nat Tonal lie inter°of istnric Places. b.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous Of to,an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State 'storic Preservation 'ce 4S11Ptll arclaaeoloical site iaaye�rtory. fl' c.The proposed action may occur wholly or ptanially within,or substwitially contiguous E3g to,an archaeological site not included on the NY SHP01 invcntory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d•Other impacts:,, __.. ........�_._ -- 11 y of die above(a-d)are answered"Moderate to Jargv impact may c occur'=,continue with the following questions help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed actionmay result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e,E3g, EJ of the site or Property. 3 f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or E3e3f, integrity. E3;,Ela, El iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e,E3 are out of character with the site or roe , property,or may alter its setting. 3 E3 , C3 .._,........ .. .... �................... ��.�.._. 11. Impact on Open SpaceRecreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportwifties or a { YES reduction of open space resource a.5 designated in any adopted municipal open space plan- (See Part plan- ( 1.C.2x,E.l.c.,E.2.q.) 1 "'Yes","a cans w r_que s tto n a-e. 1 "No 8e4 g,ro to Section 17, I,(, Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large s �F. Question(s) impact impact may may ua,cur ceur a.The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions,or"ecosystem D2e,Elb ❑ ❑ services",provided by an undeveloped including but not limited to storrnwater E2h, storage,nutrient cycling,wildlife habiw. 132m,E2o, m, b,Tlic proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a,Ele, ❑ ❑ c.The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a,C2c ❑ ❑ with few such resources. El c,F2 d.The proposed action may result in loss of an area now usod informally by the C2c,Elc to tl conarraurtity opt„n spec reso e. Othcr impacts- _ ......�. w.... _...... I'ITt ❑ m ._........................_ 12. Impact on Criticalviro a aI Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ONO S enviroumental area(CEA). (See Part 1.E A) It""Yes", ansaver ueslioi a e. ��`"No", „'o to Section 13 u ..m � T�, Relevant o,orModerate Fart I small to Inrge 41 Question(s) impact in pfld may 2r-cur a.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or EM ® [J of the CEA. ehntr�acteristic vrltic �' the basis is for designation..., .._. .. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resoutre or E3d characteristic w is was tate basis for designation of the CEA. c.Cder impacts:wThe subject prop is located within the boundaries of the Fishers Island GEA antl tree Pecanic ray-anamffnuiton§�"�A. Page of 10 13. Impact oaction,o o Transportation Ca � .. ....�� _�.... ... proposed may result in a change to existing transportation systernts, [:] `1 YES (See Part 1.D,2®j) 'ye arts°mower restio s a i;r" wSection 14 .r Relevant Tufo, Moderate Part ; tola e `PT 1� �� i '� Question{s) Impact impact ma ( kr ❑ Y (i p' ..�. C� �� t I u �' � � �' � qua k"��'drr OCCLLr a.1 r rea til traffic incr se Tit exceed w a cit of s� t�r� road n 0 N� 1 1 — etwork. D2) .The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j EJ more vehicles, c.The proposed action will degrade existing transit accesis. D2j proposed ill degrade pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j d.The ro arced action w a existing yl _ ....� .. .. c.The proposed p may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ro o action yy _.. rrNoeatpaa�tit 1pe lay laver hl�atinntavazpaa _ m .. f. Other iro cd•s Mod ni perrdt„aaTatior� 1pae r may M50 h an additWal 0-to 12 cars to a peak uaaar�aat Ilia compost station site. 14. Impact on Etaer The prolan Sed action may cage gyral 1nerease in the use of any loran of ertergy, N s5 (See Part 1. D.21) No` to Sec[ron 15 1 �a sw r t rWsfi aal�° , r. . ...... u , Relevant Moderate T PartI small tolarge Question(%) idltllaCt impact �, � ma occur occur a.The proposed actaowtl ilr v,�f�a oran�p� r� �o wan Oisli substation . D2k ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission. Dlf, ❑ 0 or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q,D2k commercial or industrial use. c The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ❑ ❑ ....... ........ d.The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g a ❑ feet of israildit�area when ara n alWed. e.Other pacts: 15i_..act on Noise, Odor,and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise,odors,or outdoor Ughting. [:]No YES (See Part 1.13.2.m.,n., and o.) f° _es r answer vestiorrs amt ��"No"°� to Section 16 o r I Via- T'° ,• elevaot No,or Moderate 6 Pa Il small l8 e Question(s) inkpact iTA[laC`t may a.The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by Local D2tn xr o regulation. b.The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 Feet of y residence., D2m,El hospital,school,licensed day care center,or Dursirt home. LS. a proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o Page 8 of 1 7, Consistency with Community The propmed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. E (See Part 1. C.1,C,2, and .3.) "Yes", cz ever rstcra er h "No", izo to.Section 18 mJ ' ,1 Relevant No,or M Moderate Part i small to large Question(s) impact impact may � i may occur occur a.The proposed action's land use components may be different from,or in sharp C2,C3,'D l a 0 ❑ contrast ttr,current surrounding land use pattern(o. Ela,Elb b.The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city,town or village C2 ❑ in which the reslect is located to grow by more t 5%. c. a proposed �.__�_�.,,��.........�__... .�._.�........ .,.. ..�.,.. .__. .... _ 1 p d action is inconsistent with local i use plans or zoning regulations. C2,C2,C3 o D d.'rile proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans,or other regional land use C2,C2 11 . 13 plans, _ e-.The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development is not C3,D lc, ❑ 13 supported y existing infiastructure or is distant from existing hiftastructure. DId,DI f., Id,Elb L Thero osed adieu is located in an area characterized p p cterized by low density development C4,132c,D2d ❑' ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j S The proposed commercial development tion may not included in the p loped action) (e,g,,residential or C2 ® t"� h.Other: � .,..�.. 1 .�_0 .... 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community ch' aster. gINO_ YES (See Part 1. C. ,C.3, D.2, 3) Yes Qf15 wer u tions a 1 ]No" proceed to Part 3 I �(i Relevant No,or Maderate Part l small to large 14 Questlou(s) impact impact may NM occura¢cur. a.The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities,structures,or areas De,Ef;F..3g a 3 -_ .. e ❑ of historic importance to themunity. b. e proposed d tion may create a dem Ir additional a ' dl_........... C4 ❑ .,�......... ^^ b ._ _ unity services(e.g. ❑ o schools,p oo s, e andfire) __ _ __ rc. . . e.The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2,C3,Dlf ❑ :.:.: ere is a shortLge.of such housing. _ Dig,Ela. d.The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2,E3 ❑ ❑ W or designated public resources. e,The _�....��...._ ._.. proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2,C character. f.Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2,C3 0 IJ PIa,Elb Elk,E2 C)tlrcr impacts:__.__,.�...,, ... __..�.�.__....�.��,.� ._.. h ..w.ww g, m _ ❑ u FORINT FULFORMM� Page 10 of 10 L WM,M Only [JtApplicable] projoct a SM0 Cwnddalon d FadWm Date: FuU Environmental Assessment rm Part 3®Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Deternrinadon of Sigfifficance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,Or May,result in a significant adverse environmental impact, Based on the analysis in Part 3,the lead agency must decide whether to require an env` ental impact statement to farther mesa the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page,the lead agency can complete its determination of significance, Reasons Supporting This Determination. To complete this section: 0 Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. a Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope,duration,probability of the impact occurring,number of people affected by the impact and any additiumd environmental consequences if the impact were to cur® a The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. Repeat this process for each Pan 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where tbare is a need toexplain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,or may,result in a significant advorse environmental impact. Provide the reason(s)why the impact may,or will not,result in a significant adverse environmental impact For Conditional Negative Declarations identify tho specific condition(s)imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. Attach additional sheers,us needed, The Fishers Island Waste Management District caused to be prepared this Full Environmental Assessment Form and an Expanded EnvirbnmerrM Assessment(ElEA)document for the proposed action and said EEA addressed the fall rag topics:Topography,Water Resources(including Groundwater,Stormwater Runoff and Drainage,Surface Water,Wetlands and Floodplains,Critical Environmental Areas),Land Use and Plans(including Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program),Noise and Odor®Aesthete Resources and Commurilly Character,Construction-Related Impacts(including Subsurface Investigations and Conditions)and Cultural Resources. Based upon ft aforesaid documents,Inclusive of the plans, reports,assessments and agency consultations,the proposed action vAll not result In any significant adverse environmental impacts. An attachment to this Part 3-EAF is included as wall as a detailed determInation. .......... Determination of Significance-Type I and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status- Type I W1 Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: R]PaTtl Pan 2 [Z]Part 3 ................................ Upon review of the information o e on this EAsF,as noted,plus this additional support information e Irvestatiora Local tr �rvwirlri tln t r'�rarcart,� a�ngr _......_. __,m...._...��... . . .__.�,��...._. and considering a e magnitude and importance of each identified pot ti impact,it is the conclusion of'the Boardmmonrnk.N, niIs nctw____lrr isrr _..landnmm _ �. -noy t-lead A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment,and,therefore,an environmental impact statement need not be prepared, Accordingly,this negative declaration is issued. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment,that impact m ill be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the fbllowing conditions which will be required by the lead agency- . 'rbore wi11,flierekire,be no si niticmit adve sc impacts from,the prtljnct as c'orrditioned,and,tber•efbiv,this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned, naguti;ve declarradon may be used only for UNLISTED cacHorks(;see ti'NYCR . 17A), C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse irlrpacts on the environment,and an environmental impact st�atcmcrrt must lie prepared to fiurther assess the in paot(s)and prsssiNe txriligcrtiou and to explore aitcruativesto avoid or mducethose impacts. Accordix'igiy,this positive declaration is issued. Name ofAction: Proposed Consolidation of Wasle,Management Facilities-FlOrars Island Waste Management DistrictNarn e of Lead Agency.- Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste management District Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Bleth Stern .,.. Title of ResponsibleOfficer: Manager Signature of Responsibleffi in Lead Agency: ate: June 27,2018 Signature of Preparer(if different from Reqponsible Cuff r) Date-, June 21,2018 For Further Information- Ann::c,mCennar®-Uancea,A,tCPCEP,President COntftct Person: Fishers Island We Management District Address: P.O.Box 22,Fis rs Island,NY 06390 Telephone Number:631-753®7455 13-mail:Rwastemanagement@Gmall.00m For Tye I Actions and Conditioned NegaLive Declarations,a copy of this Notice is sent to- ief EXeCuLive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action wil.]be principally located(e.g.,Town 6 City J Village e Other involved agencies(if arty) Applicant(if'any) Environmental Intice Bulletin: IJI p°;w rev ttyw. rrw ettpLetl ,hunl PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance ot Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD),as lead agency and the pmject sponsor, has caused to be prepareA an Expanded Environmenul Assessment(September 2017) (Expanded EA),and related plans, sur vvy,technical facility and planning reports, site and area Inspections. environmental investigations, and aWmcy consultations. Based upon the aforesaid documents and consultations,the proposed action would have no ors all impacts. There are no potential moderate to large Impacts. t ofBe -The subject property is within the boundaries of the New York State Coastal Area, and the To of Southold has an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program CLWRP). A consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP policies was performed and included in the Expanded EA and separately within the Town of Southold L Form dated December 5,2017. Based upon such analyses,the proposed action is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP and,therefore,will not have any significant adverse Impacts to coastal resources. ImpetAgoLz 1,4rid®Upon implementation of the proposed action,the area oft a °crus surfaces would increase by 0.79± acre. The total area of lawn and landscaping (Includes the proposed stornawater basin) would increase by 0.80i-acre,with approximately 0.7 acre to be revegetatedwith an appropriate non-invasive,native groundcover seed mix and left unmairs tained. The remaining 0.18±acre would include an area of evergreens to be planted at the northern portion of the project site to serve as additional buffering to adjacent residential properties, The non-vegetated areas (comprised of exposed suils,primarily compacted) would decrease by 1.67 acres. There would be no disturbance or alterations to the areas of natural vegetation or wetlands found on the over-all subject property. Appro)dmate ly 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed,with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stormwater detention basin,mixing building and Internal loop driveway. The area of slopes of zero-to-10 percent would increase by 15,289!: sf (0.35±-acre), with a corresponding decrease of 0,266±sf(0.19±acre)for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023:k sf(OA6±acre)for slopes greater than 15 percent However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprintand would notresult in changes that could createthe potential for runoff to surrounding are of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanket on the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an area that Is currently devoid of vegetation, The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the sLormwater management basin,which would result in the beneficial impact of containing stormwater from a large area of the existing facility. Based upon the above analyses, no significant adverse Impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. LlkjaW,®Upon implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd)with no projected change to the water demand. The Is no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no increases instaff and no new systems proposed. The proposed action includes methods to collect and filter son ter for use in ori-site composting operations and the wash down of surfaces, and thus, a reduction In overall water demand is expected. as upon an assessment ofthe Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth in Article 4,Section 760-452(8)of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSQ,included In the Expanded EA,the proposed action complies with the requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. Part-3-Rvahlation 0ftho?Magnftude and ImPdrtanceofProject Impacts and Determination ofNignfficance-Attachment Fishers island as ManagementDisbict Prop wed ConsoUdation of Waste Management Facilities As the proposed action would result in a minimal increase(0,79±-acre),In impervious surface,there would a minimal increase in stormwater runoff. The proposed drainage plan would accommodate stormwater from additional impervious surface area,in addition to are within the project site that are developed or within operational areas. The proposed drainage plan includes a stormwater detention basin and the installation of subgrade infiltration units,as well as methods for stormwater reuse. Storen water to he accommodated in the proposed detention basin would be first filtered with a StormceptorC(or similar)system before entering the basin. The proposed basin also Includes overflow protecd on with a riprap spillway at Elevation 10. In cases of beavy storm events,storinwater out flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stonnwater system located along the adjacent roadway. The proposed drainage plan also includes stormwater infiltration units to accommodate of runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary design includes the use of Stormtech SC-7400 collection chambers, which allow for optimal storage volumes in relatively small footprints, thus minimizing excavation. The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use as a solid was management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which will cease upon implementation of the proposed action. The consolidated facility would receive and store wastes(municipal solid was [OMSWJ,cardboard,single- stream recyclables,scrap metal and but wastes)in designated containers a r enclosed areas such that there is no potential for rainfall or surface runoff to interact with as products, Cumpost piles out be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the piles from stormwater. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. All maintenance activities would occur Inside the proposed maintenance building. Overall,the was management practices at the facility are expected to mitigate any potential significant adverse impacts associated with surface flow. The FIWMD does not handle or store toxic or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materlats are inadvertently received. The proposed stormwater detention basin and stormwater infiltration units would be constructed such that there is an adequate separation distance of, at minimurn,four feet from the base (if the basin and units to groundwater,In accordance with NYSDEC requirements for sole source aquifers. Based upon soil horings performed in areas of the project site, and the current development that exists on the project site, no soil limitations associated with infiltration are expected. However,prior to construction.additional test borings will be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and,if required,soil roWngwould be undertaken. The proposed action would also comply with Chapter 236 of-the Town of Southold Town Code, which regulates storm water management and discharge associated with land-disturbing activities and projects that involve a replacement of ora itio to impervious surfaces. Overall,based on the current condition of the site(i.e.,without a for s management system),the proposed drainage Lmprove ments would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treat The proposed stormwaLer management plan will co ply the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the To wn Code,as well as the w Y=k Stim dardsal&%=Ificaklmshx-1 rjmiP_n_4ndJ&,ftmi _QJ(New t.LQn_tT York State Department of Environmental Conservation[Ids C],2016),and the Ngw Var: llaua nuelut 11 ill- (NYSDE-C.2015). As required,the FJWMD will Me for coverage under both the New York to Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(S S) Multi-Sector General Permit for St Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities(GP-0-12-001)and the SPD ES General Permit for for ter Discharges from Construction Activity(NYSDEC GP 0-15-002),which Includes the preparation of a Star mwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)and the filing of a Notice of Intent with the NYSDEC prior to construction. 'the SWPPP will include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan tom a e stormwater generaLed on-site during construction activities,as well as for post-construction stormwater management Such SVVPPP will also comply with the requirements of the SPDES Muld-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. Page 2 Part3-Hvaluation ofthe Magnitude and Importance ofPrnJecrTmpacts and Determination qfS(yny1canca-Attachment Fishers Island Waste ManagerneatDistrict Proposed Consolidation of Was Management Facilities There is a New York State-designated freshwater wetland of an approximate size of 1.1 acres located at the southwesterly portion of the subject property and to the west thereof,is an estuarine and marine wetland of approximately 0.76 acre in size included on the National Wedand Inventory. The subject property is also bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound and a limited area of tidal wetlands e;dsts on the northwestern portion of the subject p roperty. The proposed action will not occur within the re elated adjacent areas of New York State-designated freshwater or tidal wetlands. A Letter of No Jurisdiction was issued by the NYSDEC on May 24.2018. Pursuant to§275-3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold(Chapter275 of To Code)are 12nds within 100 feetof any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland,beach, bluff,dune,flat,marsh,swamp,wet meadow,bug vernal pool,creek, estuaM stream,pond,canal,lake,land under water,or land subject to tidal action;as well as all Town Waters, The proposed action does not include any disturbance or activities within 100 feet of any of the wetlands,waterbodies or areas above. Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas, the proposed action includes measures that would Improve the existing site conditions. As described above, there are no stormwater management controls to contain stormwater on-site and to prevent not to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon implementation of the proposed action, stormwater would be captured and directed to stormwater infiltration units as well as collected, pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention sin® The placement of erosion control blankets at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff on areas that are currently devoid of vegetation.Overall,the proposed action would result in beneficial impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint Based upon the above,neitherg wird or surface water quality nor quantity would be significantly impacted by the proposed project. There are no properties on Fishers Island listed or nominated for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places; however, there are structures within Fort H.G.Wright that are identified as being eligible for listing. The Fort H.G.Wright Fishers Island Historic DfMict is also eligible for listine g. According to the Cultural Resources Information System oPRHP, the subject r® e is also located within an archaeologically-sensit[ve area, Consultations were undertaken w[Lh the OPRHP. In correspondence dated June 29,2017,OP RHP advised there are no archaeological concerns, In correspondence dated August 4,2027,OPRHP indicated that'the proposed work will have No Adven-e Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met 1.Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries;and 2. A construction protection plan will-be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction—Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G.Wright The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline.' In accordance with OPRHP's comments, the requested plans and specifications would be provided to O prior to the initiation of work on the subject property. As such,the proposed action woutdhave no significant adverse Impacts to historic resources. Iran vact onaL 01dr rh -Thnvinta e subject property is situated within two Critical Ent_)1v_1mr11uaaJaLA=1 Areas(CEAs)--Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs CEA. Both CEA's have their designations, as defined,"due to benefit to human health&protect drinking water.' The proposed action will comply with Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards,which were established to minimize Impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. Also, the proposed action would establish stormwater controls,include methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from the public water supply would be reduced.and situates improvements on developed or disturbed areas,thus requiring no natural vegetation to be removed. As such, the environmental characteristics of the CEAs mrill not be impaired Pods.? Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and 1mnortanr°a of Projectlmpacfs and Determination ofSlgnocance-Aawchment Fishers lsland WaAe MunugementDistrict Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities rr - Upon implementation a proposed acdon, the volume of wasterequiring disposal off-Island o decrease and would,therefore, decrease the number of trucks havingto visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. The proposed consolidation would alsoremove truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. 'the proposed actlon mayresult in an additional 9-to-12cars in a peak hour,based upon FIWMD records for the current operations;however,this projection does not account for the resident r business delivering to the two sites on the same day, it can be expected that a resident or business selects a waste dropday whenthey travel to both the transfer station and compoststatian for disposal. Further,the transter station is open only half-days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closedon Thursday. The proposed consolidated lha.iliiy would result in the availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. Regarding parking,the proposed project will create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. Access to the subject property would remain in its current location, However,the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way,paved loop driveway for improved circulation. Overall,the proposedaction ll not result in significant adverse traffic or parking impacts. n ". t�t~... di" Oise - The proposed improvements would take place between 7:30 am to 5:30 pm duringnon-boliday weekdays and on a limited basis,would be undertaken on Saturdays, No construction wo f lace on Sundays. The proposed development would generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction,truck movements,and heavy equipment operations. Heavy machinery,such as front end loaders,graders,bulldozers,and backoes,would be used Intermittently throw out the proposed project's construction, To mitigate construction-related noise impacts, a construction as r will oversee and prevent the idling of construction vehicles. Also, all construction equipment utilizedon-site will be equipped with rorty operating noise muffler systems. The FIWD and/or construction a er will also respond to any noise complaints during construction. such, no significant adverse construction noise impacts will result. With respect to noise impacts after development, the subject prope.ty has been used for solid waste management for 30 years and the activities to be undertaken upon implementation of the proposed action would not significantly alter the use of the property. The proposed project would not Increase the number of equipment operational hours of the un-site wheeled loader and may actually result Ina slight reduction in such operational hours since the project would involve the implementation of a covered compost system. Further, upon implementation o a proposed action, all source-separated ma rials would be handledInside the mixingili diesel-powered shredder is and would continue to operate outside to process logs and brush,with no changes to volumes expected s a result of the proposed action. a r ing the truck activity i the pick-up/drop off of containers,the project wouldresult in a reduction in the number of off-Island uc trips. Although trucks would be concentrated at the compost site,all trucks are required to be compliant with over-die-road noise limits and the F] D staff are on-site to address potential issues. Additionally,the trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contains within the site. ' t is also noted that the subject rope is adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport As such, upon implementation a proposed action,it is expected a the noise environment at the subject property would be similar to that under existing conditions, Overall,based upon the above,the proposed actionnot result in any significant adverse noise impacts. o r-Upon implementation ofthe proposed action,the FIWMD would commence accepts source-separated organic waste from users ofthe facility,which would be placedin the proposed mixing building,ground-up addedto the composting mass. This would result in an overall reduction In amount of putrescible material In theoto n inrs. Theproposed cornpostin operation wouloccur Inside the mixingbuilding, which would automatically maintain aerobic conditions;thereby,further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally,the compostmg approachwould include a full cover over the composting mass,with aeration o the pile automatically monitored and activated . Such improvements mo a current practice o Page 4 Part 3-Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Prajactlmpuc&and Derprminatfon ofSlyniflcance-Attachment Ashers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation ofWaste Man agarnent Facilities outdoor mixing and management,to indoor mixing and a cover system to protect and manage compost piles. Overall,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts associated with odors. Light-The proposed action includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings,and pole lighting on select perimeter areas,which would comply with theTown of Southold lighting standards(Chapter 172 of the Town Code). As such,the proposed action is not expected to result In significant adverse lighting Impacts. —1th Environmental Conditlons®The FIWMD site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program - Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program. The FUDS program includes four categories,in which,based on available information and consultations with the US Army Corps of Engineers (O'SACE), the FJ WMD was determined to be investigated under two of the four categories: (1) CON/HTRW (Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste), and (2) MMRP (Military Munitions Response Program). of ofthese Investigations are being led and implemented by the USACE. Fort H.G. Wright is also listed as a New York State [NYS] Inactive Waste Site (#152241), Wlth respect to Lhe CON/HTRW investigation, the USACE has advised the FIMIMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (CJS s) and one transformer on the subject properLy. Based upon information provided by USACE,the six USTs and one transformer are located outside of the project area,and thus,the proposed improvements would not have an impact on these areas® Pursuant to the 0SACE in October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017;however,said work did not occur. The USACE has now advised of its plan to commence work in the summer of 2018. With respect t®the MMRP investigation, the lei caused an environmental investigation to be prepared (Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report dated January 2017, as prepared by PW Grosser Consulting Inc] to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance (UXO) in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil quality. There is no reported history of UXO being found at the site; however, in 2007, the USACE recommended additiOrial work on Fort H.G.Wright. The FIWMD is not aware of any additional investigations since the 2007 recommendation;however,the potential presence of UXO caused the F1 to undertake investigations. The environmental investigation included a geophysical investigation, which did not identify any subsurface anomalies In the vicinity of the former batteries. There were subsurface anomalies detected on the site,but given the locations,It is not thought to be UXO. Nonetheless,the FIVVMD would undertake addittonal activities prior to and during construction to minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UXO. Regarding the soil investigation,Soil Samples were collected fiom areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment to determine if soils have been impacted by past site operations. Based upon the sampling results,there are no restiictions for reuse of soils on-site and no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel or users on the site- Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action would not be expected to result in human health impacts. Modfflcatlons to Existing Solid Waste Management Facility-The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes,and similar factors. Single-stream recycling and the improvements to cu prating facilities would result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted and used on the island,thus reducing the amount of waste required for nsport.and disposal off-Island. It Is estimated that an additional 100±® ®150±tons of cardboard material,food waste, paper and MSW could be composted.each year,which represents an approximately 14-to-20 percent waste reduction for traditional disposal® There would be also Page 5 Part.3-Evaluation oftheMagnitude anImportance ofProjecrImacoand rMtArininationofSigniJ7 nce-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management Discrict ProposedConsulidation of Waste Idanagerment Faci(Ides e a corresponding reduction in haulingand disposalcosts. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation o single-stream recycling,composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York StateYork State Department of Environmental Conservation.Beyont astE A Sa, ainable Mate SanNrt rpP filt New YojJ 'gijtq, Adopt 12/27/2010) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United es Environmental Protection Agency,• . . improve waste management practices. Dverall,the proposed action is expected to resultin beneficial impacts to solid waste management ins' a �'aa -The FI )�is special district established by a o oSoutholdin 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses o Fishers Island. In 1987, the subject rope s Lransfarred from the Town to the FIWMD for waste management services. For 30 years,the subject property has been used for such purpose. The proposed action would modernize the facility and not signillcantly change the intensity of use. Regarding landuse plans,the Fishers Island Strategic Plan 2007-2017 recd i o main objectives of the proposedaction,inclu i ( the desire of the FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost stion property in order to reduce operating and staffingcosts and improve efficiency, and 2) reducing the volume of garbage that is being shipped off the Island to reduce costs. A consistency analysis of the proposed action a LWRP policies as performed and based upon such analyses,the proposed actionis consistent with the policies and goals o the L 12 . Pago6 State Environmental Quality Review Act Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Negative Declaration Name of ction® Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Project Location® Fishers Island Waste Management District 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island To of Southold,Suffolk CounM New York Project Sponsor® Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Lead Agencya Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management DIstrict Date: June 27,2018 ------------------------- .......................................... This notice is issued pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law(State Environmental Quality Review Act[SE I)and the Implementing regulations therefor at 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District(hereinafter,the"FIVVMD"),as lead agency,bas determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment,and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS)will not areepared. Such determination is based upon the following: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form-, 2. Expanded Environmental Assessment(September 2017),as prepared by KGO Consulting,Inc; 3. Consolidated Facilities Planning Report (last revised February 2016), as prepared by Project Management Associates,LLC; 4. Waste Control Plan(May 2016),as prepar6d by Project Management Associates,LLC, S. Site development plans,as prepared by Anchor Engineering Services Inc; 6. Topographic Map Oast revised May 10, 2018), as prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying&Architecture,PLL ; 7. Pre Construction Environmental Investigation Report (January 2017),as prepared by P.W. Grosser Consulting; 8. Consultations with and determinations from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation(OPRHP),New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC),and the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA]; 9. Coordination and consultations with the Town of Southold;and 10. Site and area Inspections, SEQRA Classification: Unlisted Description of Action: The FlWD Is a special district established by the To of Southold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management services to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties—(1) a transfer station and(2) a compost station and receiving facility for various wastes and select reusable items. The proposed action Includes the consolidation of the two facilities on the site of the composts •tion and receiving facility,which ® allow the FI WMD to manage all of its services and operations at one site and,as part of the proposed action,implement improvements that would modernize its current operations to industry standards,including programs Lo reduce disposal volumes. Also Included are safety and site repairs,drainage improvements,and improvements to site security. Negative Derlaratfun NAM Island Waste Management District Proposed ConsolldaHon of Waste Management Facflfttes Specifically, a project includes a following: • Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. • Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes from users. • Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers)for scrap metal and bulky wastes. a Relocation of a 240-square-foot(s modular building from the existing transfer station to the project site for use In collecting residential E-waste,discarded small maintenance equipment[ . .,mowers, trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. • Placernenl of a ficin-sl prc.-en neer,ed storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuseby others(i.e.,ra proposed swap shop), i��.trtlS.lpr:ir�$ � r °�r7t • Construction of a 4,500-s pre-engineered building for the purpose of processing and mixing organics for posting. The propose "mixing l i "would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway, opposite the MSW receiving areas. Within the mixing buildingwould be a one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste, cardboard and other fibers, and a reinforced concrete bin wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. • Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for cotrulled aeration,moisture control by protectingpiles from stormwater,and leachate collection. A finished concrete compostpad would also be constructed. Lime1 r.•i�li'' And S to Itp„prP i la • Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building to be situated adjacent to the existing office/mintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building, the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed. • Replacement and reinforcement of the existing concrete bunker walls, including the installation o pedestrian guardrails along Lhe elevated disposal platforms in accordance with OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Administration)standards. The deteriorating ceilings of concrete c res in two locations would be demolished and the areas would be backfilled with soil and compacted. Installation of a truckscale to use in weighingIn-bound and out-bDund materials. • Improvements to site security® Including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter,swing gates at the entM site lighting and security cameras. • Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from a existing access and the creation of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the wasted rop off areas. e Installation of a%tormwater detention basin,stormwater infiltration units,as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered r the collection of water for reuse In the composting operation. Page 2 Negative da tion Hshers island WasoaManagoinerit District Pmposed Consolidation of Waste Mata Wment Faefittles As part of the proposed action,the Fl is proposing to add to the property It owns(and uses)by entering into a lease for a small portion of land owned by the Town. The proposed lease is for 2,%acres of land that currently includes the site access,the internal paved driveway,attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area. In exchange for the lease of 2.7t acres of land from the Town of Southold,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1,27:k acres at tb e northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Twn-operated sewer pump station, Upon implementation of the lease agreements, the composts on property(with the proposed transfers tion operations)would be .76 acres (9.331 acres + 2.7*acres ® 1.2% acres);however,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.21k acres (hereinafter,the"project site"or"project area"),inclusive of the facility area currently within the Town-owned property. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the lease of the 1.44-acre parcel occupied by the transfer station would terminate, SM El� Prior to the FIWMD waste management operations,the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part of the larger Fort H.G.Wright Ana prod ately 412-acre®U.S,military training and coastal defense facility established in the late 1890's, Fort H.G. Wright included 12 gun emplacements, small arms ranges, adrninisi ration buildings,housing,and an airfield. The subject property was part of a larger coastal artillery station located along the westernmost portion of Fort H.G,Wright Five batteries for various types of artillery were placed on the subject property. These batteries included gun emplacements,subgrade concrete bunkers for the purposes of resource movement and communications,and lookout posts. Remnants of the batteries and one lookout post exist today. In the mid-century,Fort H.G.Wright was closed and the land was transrerred to various entities,including the U.S.Coast Guard,the U.S.Navy,the Fishers Island IT-nion Free School District, and the Town of Southold. In 1987,the subject property was transferred to the F1 for the purpose of providing solid waste management operations to the Island's residents and businesses. At the time of acceptance of land from the To of Southold, the subject property was used for the burning of brush, construction debris and other materials (other than household garbage). In the early 1990's,the burning of materials was phased out and the current practices and program were Introduced, Reasons Supporting this Detenninadon of Non-Sigpificance; In accordance with SEQRA and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617,the FIWMD,using the EAF and Expanded EA and other relevant information cited herein,and comparing same with the thresholds set forth in 6 NYC RR 0617.4 and 617.5,has determined that this prujectis an Unlisted Action. Coordinated review was conducted with the NYSDEC,Suffolk County Planning Commissior4'rown of Southold Town Board,Office of the Town Attorney and Planning Board. Based upon the Information contained in the EAF and Expanded EA,site development plans,facility planning and waste management reports,environmental investigations,consultations with 'Y EC,OPRHP,FAA,and USACE,coordination and consultations with the To of Southold,and area and site inspections,the FIIA M. D, as lead agency for the action contemplated herein,and after due deliberation,review and analysis of proposed action,the above-described documents, consultations and inspections, and the criteria set fortb in 6 NYCRR §617.7, hereby determines that the proposed action will not result In significant adverse Impacts to the environment This determination is supported by the following: 1. L rqusiciwatej_qnd Surface. WatILDId �A V Upon Implementation of the proposed UBILX _Dja action,the consolidated facility would be expected to use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd) from its separate facilities (Le, transfer station and composts tion) with no projected change to the water demand. There is also no projected change insanitary discharge as there are no Increases in staff and non systems proposed. Upon implementation of the propoed measures to reuse a portion of the collected and filtered stone ter for on-site c® posh operations and the wash down ofsurfaces,a reductionin overall waterdernand is expected. Based upon an asseqsment of the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards set forth in Article 4, Page 3 Negative Declaration Fishers1sland Waste Managernont District Proposed Consolidation of Was&Marr ailcm ff nt Facilities Section 760-452(Bj of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSQ,the proposed action complies with the requirements for land use and development activities within the secondary protection zone. The proposed storTnwater detention basin Is to be designed to an approximate top elevation of 14±-to-16:k feet amsl and a base elevation of seven feet ams],thus providing four feet of separation to groundwater (based upon a groundwater elevation of three feet amsl). The proposed infiltration units would be located ata ground elevation of approximately 21 feet amsl with the bottom of the infiltration units set at approximately 17 feet ams], which would provide an approximate separation distance of 14 feet between the base of the units and groundwater. Accordingly,there is adequate depth provided for the filtration of or Ater. The proposed star mwater management plan Is designed to pretreat and accommodate stormwater from an existing facility that c=ently does not have formal areas for recharge. The subject property is located within a designatcd sole source aquifer, and thus, the proposed s detention basin is designed such that there will be a minimum four-foot separation distance to groundwater. The abandoned tunnel system that predates the use as a solid waste management facility is currently receiving stormwater,which will cease upon implementation of the proposed action. The proposed action also includes stormwater Infiltration units to accommodate roof runofffrom the mixing building. The proposed stortnwater management plan will comply with the goals and standards set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code,as well as the New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation tNYSDF.C], 2016), and the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (NYS E , 2015). As required,prior to undertaking construction,the FIWMD will file for coverage under both the New York to Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Multi-Sector General Permit for to water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities (GP-0-12-001) and the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Const on Activity (NYSDEC GP 0-15-002), which includes the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(S PPP)and the filing of a Notice of Intent with the NYSDEC prior to construction® The SWPPP will include a detailed erosion and sediment control plan to manage stormwater generated on-site during construction activities,as well as for post-construction star water management Such SWPPP will also comply with the rL'quirements of the SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with industrial Activities. The consolidated facility is designed to receive and store wastes(municipal solid waste["NSW], cardboard,single-strcam recyclables,scrap metal and bulky wastes) in designated containers or enclosed areas such that rainfall would not come Into contact with waste products. Compost piles will be placed on concrete pads and a cover system with leachate collection is proposed. All maintenance activities would occur inside the proposed maintenance building. The FIWMD does not handle or store is or hazardous wastes and has strict procedures in the event such materials are inadvertently received. The is a New York State-designated freshwater wefland of an approximate size of 1.1 acres located at the southwesterly portion of the subject property and to the west thereof,is an estuarine and marine wetland, of approximately 0.76 acre in size included on the National Wetiand Inventory. The subject prnperty is also bordered on its westerly side by the Fishers Island Sound and a limited area of tidal wetlands exists an the northwestern portion of the subject property. The proposed action will not occur within the regulated adjacent areas of Now York State- designated freshwater or tidal wetlands. A Letter of No jurisdiction was issued by the NYS DEC on 2 ,202 . Pursuant to§275.3(C),areas that are subject to the Wetlands Law of the Town of Southold (Chapter 275 of Town Code)are lands within 100 feet of any freshwater wetland,tidal wetland, each, bluX dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wat meadow, bog vernal pool, creck, estuary, Page 4 Negative Declaration Rshers Island Wasta Man agementDistrict Propased ronsolidation of to Manqqemant Facilities stream,pond, canal,lake,land under water, or land subject to tidal action, as well as all Town Waters. The proposed action does not include any disturbance ora es within 100 feet of any of the wetlands,waterbodies or areas above Although the proposed action would not occur within the regulated adjacent areas,the proposed action Includes measures that would improve the existing site conditions. Currently,there are no storTnwater management controls to contain for ter on-site and to prevent runoff to the vegetated areas surrounding the facility. Upon Implementation of the proposed action, s would be captured and directed to sterr rawater Infiltration units as well as collected, pretreated and discharged to the proposed detention basin. The placement of erosion control bJanke ts at select areas would control erosion and sedimentation as well as slow runoff an areas that are cu en devoid of vegetation. Furthermore,the proposed concrete black gravity all relies on the weight of the blocks for stability and,therefore,the space required fora gravity wall is less than other systems thus reducing disturbance. Overall,therefore,the proposed action would result in beneficial Impacts to the natural areas and wetlands outside of the facility footprint Based upon the above,neither groundwater quantity or quality or surface water quality will be significantly Impacted by the proposed project 2. Qasu1Ji=au=-The subject property is within the boundaries of the New York State Coastal Area,and the Town of Soca old an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP). Based upon a consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP,the proposed action Is consistent with the policies and goals of the LWRP. The property Is also not located within a floodplain,and thus,the proposed action would nut increase flooding potential. Accordingly,no significant adverse impacts to coastal resources would bee e e . 3. Approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would he disturbed, with modifications to the existing slopes primarily due to the construction of the stomwater detention sins®mixing building and internal loop driveway. The area of slopes of zero-too®1 percent would increase by 15,289±sf(0.35t-acre),with a correspqnding dem-ease of 8,266:k sf(0®19*acre)for slopes of 10-to-15 percent and 7,023±sf(0.16±acre)for slopes greater than 15 ercent® However, the proposed grade changes would occur within the existing development footprint and would not result in changes that could create the potential for no to surrounding are of lower elevation. The proposed seeding and erosion control blanket on the western portion of the project site would provide a permanent protective covering in an-area that is currently devoid of vegetation. The proposed regrading would also allow for the creation of the stormwater management basin, which would result in the beneficial Impact of containing storinwater from a large area oft e existing facility. Based upon the above analyses,no significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed grading and topographic alterations would be expected. 4. -T e proposed action out resulting minimal increase (0.79±-acre) In impervious surface, which would result in a minimal Increase in stormwater runoff. The proposed drainage plan woidd accommodate starmwater from additional impervious surface area,Ing ition to areas within the project site that are developed or-within operational areas, Specifically, a star ter detention basin and subgrade infiltration units are proposed. Stormwater to be accommodated in the propused detention basin would be first 1rd with a Stormceptor rG (or similar) system before entering the basin, The proposed basin also includes over protection with a riprap spillway at Elevation 10. In cases or heavy storm events, s would flow from the spillway to the existing municipal stormwater system located along the adjacent roadway. Negative Declaration ,Rshers island Waste ffanagwnent District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Fucilides The proposed stormwater infiltration units would acconuno date root runoff from the proposed mixing building. The preliminary design includes the use of Stormtech SC-7400 collection chambers, is allow for optimal storage volumes In relatively small footprints,thus minimizing excavation. The consolidated facility would receive and store wastes in designated containers or enclosed are such that there is no potential for rainfall or surface of to interact with waste products. Compost piles would be placed on concrete pads and the proposed cover system would protect the piles from stormwater. Leachate collection for recirculation into the composting program is also proposed. Overall,the waste management practices at the facility are expected to mitigate the potential adverse Impacts associated with surface flow and waste areas. The proposed stormwater detention basin and stormwater infiltration units would be constructed such that there is an adequate separation distance of,at minimum,four feet from the base of the basin and units to groundwater, in accordance with NYSDEC requirements for sole source aquifers. Based upon soll borliigs performed in areas of the project site, and the current development that exists on the project site, no soil limitations are expected. However, prior to construction,additional test bodngs will be performed to confirm suitable soil conditions and,If required,soil mixing would be undertaken. Overall,based on the current condition of the site(i.e., out a stormwater management system),the proposed drainage improvements would result in beneficial impacts associated with stormwater control and treatment The proposed action would also comply with Chapter 236 of the Town of Southold Town Code, which regulates stormwater management and discharge associated with land-disturbing activities and projects that involve a replacement of or addition to impervious surfaces. Priorto and during construction,erosion and sedimentation controls will be in place such tbat potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities will be minimized. The erosion and sedimentation controls and methods by which stormwater of be accommodated during construction would be designed to be consistent with Ne York State standards and manuals and the Town of Southold stormwater management regulations set forth in Chapter 236 of the Town Code. The property is not located within a floodplain,and thus,the proposed action would of increase flooding potential. Based on the above, implementation of the proposed action will na result in any substantial increase in the potendal for leaching or drainage problems,erosion,or flooding 5. H.gjd 'I- - Upon implementation of the proposed action, the ,, _U gAJW'Ju volume of waste requiring dl.sposal off-Island would decrease,therefore decreasing the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop-off. The proposed consolidation would also remove truck trafflc on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. The proposed action mayresultin additional 9-to-12 cars in apeakhour;however,this projection does not account for the resident or business delivering to the two sites on the same day. Tt can be expected that a resident or business selectsawaste drop hen they travel to both the'transfer station and compost st;ation for disposal. Further,the transfer station is open only half-days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and dosed on Thursday.The proposed consolidated facility would result in Lhe availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. Regarding parking, the proposed project will create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. Access to the subject property would remain in its current location. However,the internal roadway would be modified to a one-way,paved loop driveway for improved circulation. Overall, the proposed action will not result insignificant adverse traffic or parking impacts. 6. ALr Quahty-The proposed action will reduce the number of trucks having to visIL the Island for waste pick-up and drop-off and will not resultin a significanti ease in patron traffic,The subject grope is an existing solid was facility accessed via WhisderAvenue and 0.2 mile from the ferry Page 6 NegaM Declaration Pishers Island Waste Management Distilct Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facllltles dock,and thus,no vehicle delays would e expected. s such®there would be no increase in air emissions associated vAth traffic or vehicle idling. u er, no new significant air emissions sources are proposed. The proposed composting cover system would protect piles, thus minimizing the potential for dust and windborne sediment With respect to air quality dewing construction,land surfaces disturbed during construction would be paved or planted as soon as ra :cable following is r ce,thereby minimizing the potential for the generation of fugitive dust Additionally,during dry periods,a water truck'would be brought to the site for the wetting of soils to further minirnize dust. Excessive idling of construction equipment or vehicles would not be permitted. Accordingly,no significant.adverse changes in existing air quality are expected to result during construction. Overall,based upon the above, no significant adverse changes in existing air quality will result upon implementation of the proposed action. 7. &j=-The proposed improvements would a place between 7:30 am to 5:30 pm duringnon- holiday weekdays and on a limited basis,would be undertaken on Saturdays. No construction would take place on Sundays. The proposed development would generate typical sound levels from construction activities, including foundation construction, truck movements, and heavy equipment operations. heavy machinery, such as front-end loaders, graders, bulldozers, and backhoes, would be used Intermittently throughout the proposed project's construction. To mitigate construction-related noise Impacts,the construction manager will oversee and prevent the idling of construction vehicles. In addition,all construction equipment utilized on-site will be equipped with properlyoperating noise muffler systems. The F[WMDand/or construction manager will also respond to any noise complaints during construction. As such,no significant adverse construction noise Impacts ll result With respect to noise Impacts after development, the subject property has been used for solid waste management for 30 years and the activities to be undertaken upon Implementation of the proposed action would not significantly alter the use of the property, The subject property is also adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport. The proposed project would not increase the number of equipment operational fours of the on-site wheeled loader and may actually result in a slight reduction in such operational hours since the project would involve the implementation of covered compost system, Further, upon implementation of the proposed action, all source- separated our -separated materials would be handled inside a triixing building. A diesel-poweredshredder is and will continue to operate outside to process logs and brush® Regarding the truck activle project would result in a slight reduction in the number of off-island truck trips. Although trucks would he concentrated at the compost site,all trucks are required to be compliant with over-the- road noise limits and the Fl staff are ors-site to address any potential issues. Additionally, e trucks would operate in the lower level of the facility site,where any noise impacts would be more contained to the site. such,upon i ple entaLion of the proposed actio n, a noise environment at the subject property wouldbe similar to that under existing conditions. Overall,the propose action will not result hi any significant adverse noise impacts. Upon implementation of the proposed action, the FlWMD would commence accepting source-separated organic waste from users of the faculty,which would be placed in the proposed mixing building,ground-upand added a compost* Inss, is would result in overall reduction in theamount of putresci le material in theutbound MSW containers. Theproposed composting operation would occur inside the mWng building, which would maintain aerobic conditions; thereby,further reducing any potential for odors to occur. Finally,the composting approach would Include a fall cover over the composting ss, with aeration of the pile automatically monitored and activd within. Such improvements modify the currentpracticeof outdoor mixing and management, to indoor mixing and a cover system protect and manage Page 7 Megattm Declaration Fishers Island Wusu Murtugernent District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Man agernentFacilities compost piles. Overall,based upon the above,the proposed action will not.result in Significant adverse impacts associated with odors, 9. 1eratio¢ The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in total volume handled upon implementation of e proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed packaging and disposal trends,population changes,and similar factors. Single-Mearn Single-srecycling and the improvements to composting facilities would result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted and used on the Island, us reducing e amount of waste required for transport and disposal off-Island. It is estimated at an additional 100t-to-150t tons of cardboard aterial,food waste,paper and MSW could be composted each year,which represents an approximately 1 -to-20 percent waste reduction for traditional disposal. There would be also be a corresponding reduction in hauling and disposal costs. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD'by,among other things, to for the implementation of single-stream recycling, composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent withthe recommendations of both New York State (New York State Department of Environmental Conse ation. . , p�(e Adopted 12/27/2010) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (United States Environmental Protection Agency, ,w F � � October 2015)to improve waste management.practices. Overall, based upon the above,no significant adverse Impacts would occur° Rather,the proposed action is expected to result in beneficial Impacts Lo solid waste management. 10. , ° : G4 pan rrrtie -The proposed action is to occur within an operational area of an existing solid waste managementfacili that has occupied thes ject property for 3 0years. Theproposed action would not include the removal of any native or natural vegetation,and includes stormwater management controls to accommodate stormwater runoff generated within the project site. The proposed slope stabilization measures, including seeding areas with native, non-invasive plantings and installation of erosion control blankets,would protect areas outside the project site, including areas of natural vegetation,wetlands and surface waters. Overall,the proposed action would not include the removal or destruction of vegetation or fauna, would'not substantially interfere with the movement of any resident or inigratory s ec:ie% and would nut impact threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the associated habitats, As such, no significant adverse impacts to natural resources would be expected upon implementation of the proposed action. IL fxJUQJXUXJrDAMgntA- LAj_W,.,�-The subject property is situated within two Critical Environmental Are (CEAs)--Fisher's Island CEA and the Peconic Bay and Environs of E 's have their designations,as defined,"due to benefltto human health&protect drinking ter," The proposed action will comply with the Fishers Island Watershed Protection Standards, which were established to minimize impacts of pollution on surface water quality and groundwater recharge. Also, the proposed action would establish stor water controls, include methods to reuse stormwater such that the demands for additional water from a public water supply would be reduced,and situates improvements on developed or disturbed areas,thus requiring no natural vegetation to be removed. As such, the environmental characteristics of the CEAs will not be impaired 12. Hist.orirai. , rah�.ctj 1' it?'1 1 1 1.e l t[ 1 ..e �11i 'udine Co lid r c� - -There are no properties on Fishers Island listed ornominated for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places;however,there are structures within Fort Cr.Wright that are identified as bei eligible for listing. The Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District is also eligible for listing. According to the Cultural Resources Information t Page 8 Negah'vp Declaration Fish en Island Waste Management mstylct Proposed Consolidation of Waste ManagamentFactilties of OPRHP,the subject property is also located within an archaeolea giCal-sensitive area. However, In correspondence dated June 29,2017,OP RHP advised there are no archaeological concerns, Regarding historic resources, in correspondence dated August 4, 2017, OPRHP indicated the following: "the proposed work will hove No Adverse Impact upon historic resource[s]provided the following conditions are met.,1.Plans and speciffcations for the planned all improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the Initiation of work on these Batteries,and 2.A construction protection plan will be put In place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction-Our intention with the above conditions Is to respect the historic footprint of thesestructures which has survived and contributes to the histnry of Fort H.G. Wright 71he purpose of our review ofplans and specificationsfor the planned wall Improvements is to retain this historic footprint autline." In accordance with CP 's comments, the requested plans and specifications would be providedto OPRHP prior t®the Initiation ofwork on the subject property. As such,the proposed action would have no significant adverse Impacts to historic resources. The overall visual character of the subject property is that of a solid waste maro agemem facility. The proposed action would not alter the topography or vegetative buffers that exist between Fox Lane and the project site. The proposed design situates the mixing building and composting pads at the westerly portion of the facility,where there is adequate land area and Is furthest from residential properties. It Is expected that portions of the mixing building would be visible from the site entrance; however,the visual changes are not expected to be significant. The FIVMD is also proposing to maintain the existing perimeter vegetation as well as to establish an area of evergreens along the northern area of the project site (adjacent to the operating area) for the purposes of providing a visual buffer from residential properties to the northeast of the facility. Based upon the FAA review of the building elevations, the proposed action. would not pose a hazard to lbs Elizabeth Field airport Overall,implementation of the proposed action would not result in the Impairment of the character 'or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character, The proposed action Includes the installation of fixed lighting on the proposed maintenance and mixing buildings,and pole Ughting on select perimeter areas,which would comply with the Town of Southold lighting standards [Chapter 172 of the Town Code),and Is subject to the review and approval of the Town Building Department. As such,the proposed action is not expected to result in significant adverse lighting impacts, 11 -The proposed action will not result In a major change in the quantity or type of energy used. 14. Public Health lnmnct-The FI site,as part of the overall Fort H.G.Wright,is currently in the Defense Environmental Restoration Program-Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)program, The FUS program includes four categories, in which, based on available infotionand consultations with the US Army Corps of Engineers(USAGE),the FI4 was determined to be investigated urs dertwo,of the four categories:(1)CON/HTRW(Containerized Storage/Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste),and (2) MMRP (Military Munitions Response Program), Both of these Investigations are being led and implemented by USACE. Fort H.G.Wright Is also listed as a New York State (NYS) Inactive to Site (V152241). With respect to the CON/HTRW investigation, the USACOR has advised the FIVVMD of a planned removal of six abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) and one transformer an the subject property. Based upon information provided by USACOR,the six USTs and one transformer are located outside of the project area. Pursuant to the USACOE In October 2016, this work was tentatively planned for FY2017;however,said work did not occur. The USACOE has now advised of its plan to commence work in the summer of 2 010® Page 9 ft a tive Deduratin" Fishers Isiand to Afawgemant District Proposed Consohdation of Waste lyfanagement FaWittes With respect to the MMRP investigation,the F[WMD caused an environmental investigation to be prepared to evaluate the likelihood of the presence of unexploded ordnance(UXO)in areas to be disturbed during site redevelopment as well as the potential for past site uses to have impacted soil qual", There Is no reported history of UXO being found at the site;however,In 2007,the US Army Corps of Engineers recommended additional or on Fort H.G.Wright The F]WMD Is not aware of any additional investigations since the 2007 recommendation;however,the potential presence of UXO caused the FIVMD to undertake investigations, The environmental investigation included a geophysical investigation, which did not Identify any subsurface anomalies in the viciniVof the former batteries. The were subsurface anomalies detected on the site,but given the locations, it is not thought to be UXO. Notwithstanding, the FIWMD would undertake additional activities prior to and during construction to minimize and/or limit the likelihood of encountering UXO during the site redevelopment and the risks associated with such UM Regarding the soil investigadon,soil samples were collected from areas which would be disturbed during the site redevelopment to determine if sails have been impacted by past site operations. as upon the sampling results, there are no restrictions for reuse of sails on-site and no concerns of exposure to elevated levels of chemical contaminants in on-site soils by construction personnel orusers on the site. Accordingly,based upon the above,the proposed action will not result in the creation of a hazard to human health. -There are no changes to the current land use as a solid waste management facility. The proposed action would not significantly change the intensity of use,as the services on-site would be altered to include the receiving of municipal solid waste and recyclables in four compactor boxes,while modernizing the activities performed on-site. As such, the proposed action will not substantially change the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural.open space or recreational resources,or in its capacity to support existinguses. 16. landJJSL--UitTipaliWlby-,--ind Consistency _aM- The FIWMD is a special district established by the Tuwn of Sauthold in 1952 for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. In 1,987,the subject property wa,s transferred from the Town to the FIWMD for waste management services. For 30 years,the subject property has been used for such purpose. Regarding land use plans,the Fishers Island Styate Plan 2007-2017 recognized the two main objectives of the proposed action, including:(1)the desire of the FIWMD to consolidate its facilities on the compost station property In order to reduce operating and staffing costs and improve efficiency; and (2) reducing the volume of garbage that is being shipd off the Island to reduce costs- A consistency analysis of the proposed action with the LWRP was performed determined to be consistentvAth the policies and is of the LWRP. As such,the proposed action will not create a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. 17, fkrv_wTbJ-hcis LmgJmp,1cJa-The FIWMD handles approximately 792.5 tons of solid was per year and no changes are projecLed upon Implementation of the proposed action. Any changes in amounts handled in the future would be attributed to packaging and disposal trends,population changes,and similar factors. Accordingly,the proposed action will not result In any significant adverse growth-inducing impacts. 18. crymbon n ,2,kg,wXd -The proposed action will not create a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above-discussed consequences. 19. QUiplilatlYk lnV. =-Implementation of the proposed action will not result in changes in two or more elements of the environment,no one of is has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result In a significant adverse impact on the enviroriment. Further, Page 10 Negative ocia tion Rshers Island aste Mongysm antDis&ict Proposed Consolidation ofasts ManagementFacilities Implementation of the proposed action Will not results cumulative Impacts at would meet of the criteria set forth at 6 NYCRR§617.7, For Further Inforruation: Contwr ® Beth Stern Address.- Fishers Island WasteManagement is i P.O. ®x 22 b1shers Island,New York 06390 flwastemanagement@gmall.com Telephone ®e (6S1)788-7455 Page u Negative Declarattan l7khers Island Waste HariagernentDistrfet Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities A copy of flds Deftrmination Is being sent to; Town ofSou thold Town Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,NewYork 11971 Town of Southold,Office of the Town Attorney,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold PlanningBoar d,P.D.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Ms. Carrie Meek Gallagher, Director, New Yorlt State Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY at Stony Brook 50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,NewYork 11790 Mr.Jim Wade,P.E.,Environmental Engineer 2,Division of Materials Management,No York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNYat Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook New York 11790 Ms.Sherri Ai r,Environmental Analyst,Division of Environmental Permits,New York StaLe Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Beth A.Cumming,Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator,NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation,Division for Historic Preservation,P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12808-0189 Suffolk County Planning Commission,H.Lee Dennison Building-11th Ploor,100 Veterans Memorial highway, P.O.Bcox 6100,Hauppauge,New York 11788-0099 Page 12 Fishers Island Waste Management District P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island, NY 06390 Tele 631-788-7455 gMa�kcorn Gregory Thibodeau, Chair John Patterson, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary Meredith Doyen Bruce Hubert Fishers Island Waste Management District made the following Resolution on Wednesday,June 27, 2018. WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners is considering a "Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Operations" and has undertaken the necessary and appropriate review required under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, afterfull consideration of the potential impacts of the proposed action, the Board has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District hereby adopts the Notice of Determination of Non-Significance and Negative Declaration dated June 27, 2018 (Exhibit A) attached hereto and made a part hereof as if more fully set forth herein and directs the Secretary of the District to send copies of same to all involved and interested agencies in accordance with the requirements of SEQRA. Beth A.Stern S�.err L William D. Moore 9` Attorney at Law "10 2H3 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 -a'JI@—10 I'd 10 W Tel: 631-765-4663 "amiiq Board Fax: 631-765-4643 -� - � May 22, 2018 Donald Wilcenski, Chair and Members Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re Fishers Island Waste Management District SCTM 1000-12-1-1.1 Site Plan Dear Chairman Wilcenski and Board Members: Enclosed is a copy of my letter of May 8, 2018 to the Town Attorney with respect to the Board's decision to forego site plan review of this municipal project. Please confirm that our understanding is correct so that we may continue with the project accordingly. Thank you. Atr�n c tir.: M care WDM/mr cc: Board of Commissioners FIWMD William Duffy, Town Attorney William D. Moore Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: 631-765-4663 Fax: 631-765-4643 May 8, 2018 William Duffy, Esq. Southold Town Attorney P.O. Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District Dear Bill: In confirmation of our telephone conversation today, I have been advised that the Town Planning Board has changed its position with respect to the District's transfer station and compost facility improvement project, and that Planning Board site plan approval will not be required. Kindly confirm this with the Board and advise us, so that I may proceed with the District and bond counsel with this project. Thank you. Very truly yours, William D. Moore WDM/mr OFFICE LOCATION: / `` MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex � P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 „�; �" �� Southold NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold NY � Telephone: 631765-1938 ' t�a www.southoldtownny.gov u w.0 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 16, 2018 William D. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Fishers Island Waste Management District Fox Avenue and Whistler Avenue, Fishers Island SCTM#1000-12.4-1.1 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Department is in receipt of the Site Plan Application regarding the above-referenced project. Pursuant to §280-130A and our standard application review procedures, a Building Permit Application and subsequent Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department is required before any further steps can be taken on the matter by this department. If you have any questions regarding this Site Plan or its process, please do not hesitate to call this office. Respectfully, Brian Cummings Planner William D. Moore Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: 631-765-4663 P Fax: 631-765-4643 April 18, 2018 BY HAND Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Chairman and Members of Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Annex Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District SCTM 1000-12-1-1.1 Site Plan Dear Chairman Wilcenski and Board Members: I am co-counsel with Patricia C. Moore representing the Fishers Island Waste Management District("FIWMD")with respect to the consolidation and improvements to the municipal solid waste transfer station and composting facility operated on Fishers Island. In confirmation of a conference held with the Town Attorney William Duffy, and Mark Terry, the Commissioners of FIWMD have agreed to file and submit an application to the Planning Board for site plan approval of this municipal solid waste facility. It was further agreed that FIWMD would conduct the SEQRA review of this project as the lead agency. In furtherance of these understandings, enclosed please find the following: • Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application • Applicant's Affidavit • Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form • Authorization of Agent • LW" Consistency Assessment Form • Stormwater Management Report prepared by Anchor Engineering Services, Inc. dated April 4, 20187 (9 copies) • Key Area Map of surrounding property owners (9 copies) • Survey of property (4 prints) • Site Plans (9 prints) On behalf of FIWMD, the design professionals look forward to the Board's review and input so that the much needed improvements to this municipal facility can be undertaken. William D. Moore Attorney at Law Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District Southold Town Planning Board Site plan April 18, 2018 As this is an application by a municipal entity created pursuant to New York State law, it is requested that the application fee be waived. Kindly advise when you may wish to meet with the design professionals so that we may provide them sufficient notice of any meetings (engineers are from Connecticut). If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Ver yon°' n M WDM/mr Encls. cc: Scott Russell, Town Supervisor(w/o enclosures) Board of Commissioners FIWMD KGO Consulting, Inc. Anchor Engineering Services, Inc. SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION FORM Site Plan Name and Location F T _ - Application Site Plan Name: 1 5 ISM��A 6 L�A� ` b, �� ,�_1�A lication Date: f6-L1-L7 Suffolk County Tax Map#I000 1-L-- - t i. 1 Other SCTM#s Street Address: Z-1 L o W 141 S TLc:F12 Aq Hamlet: F S S F!E�Z/ �' L Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: New Amended_Residential Zoning District OwnerslA en Contact Information Please list name, mailhi address, and �wne number or the petyVe below: Property Owner Fi fl S � �17M/�s✓ /��= r i/t Street Pa 3r by City r r State--" Zip df,,�7 o Home Telephone Other 3 7 89— Applicant j ,1 't�� /�'7✓�Ce �M/ 7l f i 2r ; Street City r h'�T7 t S L A--1 State Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* W` 1_ 10 On H 00RJ Street 02-,0 1Yk i✓ t o City State Zip / ?� Office Telephone 4 ! � Other l ' (o ��'Ker3c' *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Site Plan Application Form 211812010 Site Data Proposed construction type: New V/ Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: ac; Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No If yes, explain: Does the parcel(s) meet the Lot Recognition standard in Town Code§280-9 Lot Recognition? Y�N� If"yes", explain(and attach any necessary documentation–title report, subdivision approval, etc.) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses:eo Al?o S i i 6 YA-2-1> WA-C(_6 C t List all proposed property uses: �K1 i/ Cf� �� l��1� 7_A 10 Al Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: % Proposed lot coverage: % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): sq. ft, gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: #of existing spaces: #of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage: Wetlands: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes >"No Maybe I, the undersigned, certify tha all the abovq information is true. Signature of Preparer: Date: _ l I g 2 Site Plan Application Form 2/18°2010 APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUF'F'OLK 'Y 4"tt' �.. , being duty sworn,deposes and says that h .........®.w�._ ..,,.,.,.......... a a... kYd and i4te 6 surmll JUIC"t - k ' or that he is the Trtic �. ` of e , w�` ....: L rA r �a ". �° a L "_.�....__ . l } (Specify whether P ershap or Corp.) and said Corporations is the owner of the above property, which is hereby making a Site Plan application; that there are not existing structures car improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel including all rights-of-way,has been clearly established and is shown onn said Plan; that no part of the Plan iriffinges upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads;that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning d for the filing of Site glans and will comply with e; that the plans submitted,&,;approved, will not be alter or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plana as approved by the Planning Board. -11- 1 if artttahr or °tar ora a fClcer and Title) Sworn to me this l � day u£��^�G°a "�a A� H Notnr"y Li lic Southold ,. Applicant Transactional is s The Town of Suitt of es Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. e purpose of this fonn is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicti;of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. r Your Name: k ......_._V. G. aL1 ^..1.J .. 7)1. t iZtC L,,_st, ° First. middle initial rraricsseyou are appl1®ing in the name ca%scptprcone else Or rather entity,such as sa conrpa y !J so® indicate tire when person°s or comparaav`s napn . Nature of Applicatiow (heck all that apply) Subdivision or Ire-subdivision Site Plan Other(Please name other activity) Do you personally(or 1hrough your company,bpouse,oibling.parent or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Tcasyrt of Southold? "Reladonship,includes by blood,marriagc or business°interest. "13casiites°i interest"means a busirt ,including a partnership,in which the town officer or c p)oycc has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%oft e shares Yep Cour M'. If YOU answered"Yes"complete the hahuice of this lbrm and date and sign where indicated Name of the person e ployed by the°Craws of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant)and the town officer or employee. Fithcr check tbr appropriate line A through Dand/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent or child as(check all that apply): &the owner of grearer than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(ethers the applicant is a Corporation); the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity(when the applicant as neat a corporation), C.an aflicer,director,partner or employee of the applicant;or D.the actual applicant Description of Relationship _ _ _ Submitted this / clay of o 1 I Disrlo.surre Form AUTHORIZATION'ION OF AGENT GREGORY THIBODEAU,Chair of the FISHERS VSLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT which is the owner of the property identified as SUM a w22-1-1a16n Fishers Island,New York states,The District hereby authorizes PATRICIA Co MOORS and WILLIAM LI D.MOO RE attorneys with offices at 53020 Main Road„ Southold, New York 33971 to act as our agents to handle all inec ss fy work involved with the site plan application process for this property with the Southold Town PlannIng Board, FISHERS ISLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ,f By Gregory Thibode u, Chair Sworn to before me the/" day of Feb.2038 " " k � FOR INTERNAL USE uN� "` USE PETER[1 IN- T10 .. ti}� _� SITE PLAN U 2017 So utV oki 10�111uI Deterrt inatiOrl F'9 s�ruu�d r N u�� 'L _ Initial _ pate Sent. project Narne: _ Project AddressJ: 2 _ Zoning District: No.:1000 ---- r Suf€olk County Tax Map ( . 1, gu'et a lication and supporting documentation to (Note: Copy of Building � Permit Alap V� J �propoed use or ass Fuld be Mitted.) initial Determination as to whether use is per . ed' p ni s required__ Initial-Dete.rmination as to whether site la .�. . opectd Signatur o,` rtment (P.D.) Referral: Planning Depa . _ . i7 Date of Commen#: _J�—fes p,D,Date Received:= -- corn ent " Signature of Planning De ,.Staff Revjewer Final Deesiination Date: -- Decision:_ ----� - c:.,r,afi�rP �f Riiildin❑ Insnect�r PATIUCIA C. MOOPE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax:(631)765-4643 March 27, 2017 Michael Verity, Building Inspector Town Hall Annex 54375 Rt 25 Southold, NY 11971 By Hand Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District Facility Improvements Dear Mike: As you know the Fishers Island Waste Management District is a "Municipal Law Special District". Pursuant to your request, enclosed is a building permit application and $50.00 check to initiate your`official" review. As previously discussed in the attached letter, the construction plans for the buildings will be submitted upon your review of the "use" and site improvements. Vryr rs, rici'a C. Moore encls. c: Gregory Thibodeaux irectorvthibodeauOhotmaill.com Matt Anchor Brown : mbrown@anchorenr.com David Brown: dbrown@consultpma.net [ECEVE MAR 2 7 2017 BUILDINGDEPT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)765-4330 D Fax:(631)765-4643 MAR 2 2 201 March 21, 2017 BUILDING DEPT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Michael Verity, Building Inspector Town Hall Annex 54375 Rt 25 Southold, NY 11971 By Hand Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District Facility Improvements Dear Mike: In accordance with our previous discussions, the Fishers Island Waste Management District (FIWMD) has plans for District improvements and consolidation of operations. We anticipate building permits from your office for construction of the structures and review of the detailed storm water engineering plans by the Town Engineer. As a Municipal project with extensive reviews having been completed by the various State and Federal agencies, the site plan complies with these agency requirements. We do not expect to be required to submit a Planning Board reviewed "site plan" for this project. I have enclosed an "Overview" prepared by the FIWMD Engineers and consultants which details the history of the property and uses, together with the proposed site improvements and preliminary plans prepared by Anchor Engineering Services Inc.dated 11/8/16. The use is permitted as a Municipal Use and the site improvements have been reviewed by the applicable regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over this property. This review will enable my client.to begin the bidding process. We appreciate your time and as soon as you advise, we will submit formal building permits for the proposed structures. - V ry truly yours, rdcia C Moo encls. c: Gregory "hibodeau: re o hibodeau hotmail.com Matt Anchor Brown : mbrown�anchorenr.+ orr�__ David Brown: dbrownD onsuitpma.net Overview of Fishers Island Waste Management District Facility Improvements This summary provides an overview of the proposed improvements to the Fishers Island Waste Management District's property generally referred to as the "compost site".Additional information can be provided upon request. The District currently operates two facilities;a transfer station on Town property that accepts ordinary refuse (MSW)and recyclables from households and businesses on the Island and a compost site that is owned by the District and which accepts oversized bulky waste(furniture,scrap metals,appliances, etc.)and brush and logs. For reasons not clear at this time,the transfer station was built at its current location(separate from the compost site operations)approximately 25 years ago when the landfill was closed,which resulted in operation and maintenance of two sites.The transfer station has elevated positions where users place MSW and corrugated cardboard into hoppers that are connected to compactor roll-off containers.At a lower level recyclables are placed into roll-off containers.All of the waste and recyclable containers originating at the transfer station go off-Island to processing and disposal facilities.This facility is in a low area subject to flooding in extreme weather conditions and is undersized for current industry practices and what would reflect an efficient way to handle recyclables.The site has no stormwater control system. With the exception of a small office and one-bay maintenance shop area,the compost site essentially remains as an approximately 100 year old WWI coastal gun battery bunker,improvised to be used as a composting and transfer facility.Open containers are positioned in the lower level of the bunker and users deposit material into the containers(oversized bulky waste,scrap metals,and wood.)Brush and logs are accumulated on-site and ground up and composted to produce a beneficial product.At the compost site,the historic gun bunker structures are showing evident signs of deterioration and areas present a risk of collapse.Further,the site does not have OSHA-compliant fall protection for workers and users. Finally,stormwater from the site is not controlled. The project would consolidate operations at the compost site and upgrade the facilities.Further,the improvements will not alter the overall footprint of the operations from the current practice.Finally, the cleared area of the site would not be increased and the District does not anticipate increasing the number of staff necessary to operate the consolidated facility as compared to current practices. With the exception of the enhanced composting program,after the improvements are completed the site will function similarly to the current operation. Users will enter the site at the same location, proceed to the elevated area (now overlooking the bunker interior)and deposit waste and recyclables into hoppers and containers positioned in the lower area of the bunker.After depositing their materials,users will then follow a clock-wise travel pattern and exit the site at the current location of the site entrance. 1 The proposed improvements shown on the site plan are for the compost site and reflect the following activities and features; 1. Construction of new,engineered retaining walls around the interior of the bunker; 2. Installation of OSHA compliant fall protection at the upper level where employees and users access the receiving containers; 3. Installation of a system to collect and treat stormwater from the lower,working area of the site and to use stormwater in the composting program; 4. Installation of a modern enclosed composting approach with controlled aeration and emissions.This approach,in combination with a new program of accepting source-separated food and organic waste from Island residents and businesses will increase the composting program's performance and reduce the volume of waste shipped off-Island for disposal; 5. Consolidation of all waste and recycling activities at the site thus allowing the District to return the parcel owned by the Town; 6. Erection of a pre-engineered metal building as part of the enhanced composting program to receive,shred,and temporarily store organics before they are placed into the compost system. 7. Erection of a pre-engineered metal building to serve as a maintenance garage; 8. Improvements to the existing office building to provide meeting space and employee facilities; 9. Installation of fencing,lighting and security equipment to make the site more secure and safe. In summary,the project will address safety and environmental issues,while consolidating the District's program to provide efficiency in operations and management of the materials handled at the site. Permitting The NYSDEC has adopted general permit regulations to assist entities such as the Fishers Island Waste Management District in licensing and operating facilities in a safe and environmentally compliant manner.The District has utilized this general permit registration program for its current operations and applied for and received approval of registration of the proposed consolidated facility operation under the program.Specifically,the registration is made pursuant to part 360-11.1(b)(i)of the regulations and the District provided NYSDEC the completed registration form,a Waste Control Plan, and a permit site plan. NYSDEC adopted the general permit program to simplify permitting and regulation of facilities such as the District's facility.Under this program,the regulations specify operating and design conditions that the registrant must follow at the site,thereby eliminating the need for each registrant to re-create a full operation and management plan and the NYSDEC's subsequent review.Specific to this facility,the District prepared and provided the above-mentioned two project specific documents; 1. Waste Control Plan;This plan provides certain specifics about the District's facility and its operations,including: a. Organization of the District,Staffing,and employee training; b. A breakdown of estimated quantities and volumes for each material stream handled; 2 C. Signage and record-keeping;and, d. Additional details such as identification and management of unacceptable materials inadvertently received. 2. Permit Site Plan;This sheet shows the location of containers and each material stream on the site.The plan also shows traffic flow and site features such as buildings,gate,and similar items. The application form states the facility will manage not more than 2,000 tons/year including all material streams and not more than 8,000 cubic yards/year. Further,the application represents the District will not have more than 1,000 cubic yards or 250 tons on-site at any time.These levels were identified for conservative purposes and actual amounts are expected to be much less that these levels.At present the District is estimated to handle less than 1,000 tons/year of all materials at both of its facilities,and any increases realized at the consolidated facility are expected to be primarily limited to population growth over time or changes in waste generation patterns.This registration has been approved. Prior to operations,the consolidated facility will be required to register for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Industrial Activities. The facility is regulated under Sector N (Scrap Recycling Facilities,Including Transfer Stations Accepting Household Recyclables)of this permit. The currently available permit expires on September 30,2017,however it is presumed that the permit will either be extended or re-issued with a new expiration date at some point in the future. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING ERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans....... TEL:(631)765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX-(631)765-9502 Survey_ SoutholdTown.North]Fork.net PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form, Trustees C.O.Application Flood Permit Examined 20_ Single&Separate Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved —20 Mail to: Disapproved a/c - Phone: Expira6on........—1 20_ M97 ........... Building Inspector MAR 2 7 2017 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date -7 20 BUILDING Dr,1PT- INSTRUCTIONS T ionTLD.q0.9XiSc2,Rffl .UST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing_code_gind regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. "--'(Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) ,5(o 2-0 /C/ (Mailing address ofdpplicant) State whether applicant is owner,lessee,agent,architect,engineer,general contractor,electrician,plumber or builder -T—------/............ J Name of owner of premises ......................... (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: House Number `trees' I larnlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Sectionf Block d Lot Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy b. Intended use and occupancy 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal. Demolition Other Work -_,_ 4. Estimated Cost Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front �. I' r Hear Depth Height Number of Strips 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth i t:^ Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot:Front Rearn Dept�t C�tr mi.l 10.Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11.Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12.Does proposed construction violate any zoning law;ordinance or regulation?YES_NO 13.Will lot be re-graded?YES_NO Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES_NO 14.Names of Owner of premises Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No, 15 a.Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? `YES NO *IF YES,SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES&,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b.Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?*YES NO *IF YES,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16.Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17.If elevation at any.point on:property is at 1'0 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey. 18.Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property?*YES NO *IF YES„PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: Co Y OF_�t_) being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the (C Cnt actor„ gent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in he application filed therewith. S o o before met i y of 201 BETSY A.PERKINS otarry Fublic,State of New Yor a ublac Qtual�fed in Suffolk Cott ignature of Applicant Commissibn Expires July 18 e� _ Fishers Island Waste Management DistrictI� t P.O. Box 22 Fishers Island, NY 06390 Tele 631-788-7455 i Fax 631-788-7451 fiwaste nia emeti maii.com,i Gregory Thibodeau, Chair Robert Goodwin, Treasurer Sarah Malinowski,Secretary John Patterson Bruce Hubert VIA OVERNIGHT CARRIER Date: July 5,2017 To: All Potentially-Involved Agencies and Interested Agencies/Parties From: Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Re: State Environmental Quality Review Act-Lead Agency Coordination Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Fishers Island,Town of Southold,Suffolk County The Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Waste Management District (Board of Commissioners or FIWMD) is a special district established by the Town of Southold for the purpose of providing solid waste management services to the residents and businesses on Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on Fishers Island,including:(1)a transfer station located at 58 Town Road;and(2)a compost station and receiving facility located at 2760 Whistler Avenue. It is the intent of the FIWMD to consolidate the two facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility. As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD would undertake site improvements to accommodate the transfer operation, as well as modernize its current composting and receiving operations. Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with a detailed description of the proposed action, as well as project plans, are enclosed. In accordance with 6 NYCRR§617.6(b)(2)and(3),the Board of Commissioners has reviewed this proposed action and has preliminarily determined that same is an Unlisted Action. The Board of Commissioners is undertaking coordinated review and has identified the potentially-involved agencies and interested agencies/parties (listed herein on page 2). If no objections or responses are received from the potentially- involved agencies, it is the intention of the Board of Commissioners to declare lead agency status on or about August 8, 2017. Therefore, please review the enclosed materials and advise in writing, of any objection to the Board of Commissioners serving as lead agency,no later than 4:00 p.m.on August 7,2017. All communications should be addressed to Beth Stern, Fishers Island Waste Management District, P.O. Box 22, Fishers Island, New York 06390. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact the FIWMD or Patricia C.Moore,Esq.at 631-765-4330,as special counsel to the Board of Commissioners. cc: P.Moore,Esq. 1..aist of Potentially-Involved Agencies encies and Interested A encies Parties Mr. Jim Wade, P.E., Environmental Engineer 2, Division of Materials Management, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Ms.Carrie Meek Gallagher,Director,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY at Stony Brook,50 Circle Road,Stony Brook,New York 11790 Suffolk County Planning Commission, H. Lee Dennison Building - 11th Floor, 100 Veterans Memorial Highway,P.O.Box 6100,Hauppauge,New York 11788-0099 Town of Southold Town Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971 Town of Southold,Office of the Town Attorney,P.O.Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971(interested party) Town of Southold Planning Board,P.O.Box 1179,Southold, New York 11971 (interested agency) Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that infonnation. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities-Fishers Island Waste Management District describe Location Project Proj ,and nd attach a general location map): 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island, NY 06390 Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): The FIWMD is proposing to relocate its transfer station operations and equipment from a Town-owned parcel located at 58 Town Road to its existing compost station and receiving property located at 2760 Whistler Avenue. The proposed action would allow for the consolidation of staff and facilities on one property. As part of the proposed action,the FIWMD would undertake site and facility upgrades to modernize its current operations,including an improved composting operation to decrease the amount of solid waste being transported and disposed of at facilities off-island(as there is no waste disposal on Fishers Island). See the attachment to this EAF for additional information. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:631-788-745 ...... .. .... 5 Fishers Island Waste Management District E-Mail„ fiwastemanagement@gmail.com Address: ...._.... �.... P.O.Box 22 ._....... ........... City/PO:Fishers Island State:NY Zip Code:06390 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:516-522-2645 _.. ... .. IC O Consulting,Inc.,as environmental consultant,attn:Kim Gennaro-Oancea,IVIS.,President E-Mail: kgennaro@kgoinc.com Address: 626 RXR Plaza City/Pol. State: [—Zip- Code. Uniondale NY 111556 Property Owner (if not same... __ _.... e as sponsor): Telephone:. E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ('`Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other fonns of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, OYes[]No Execution of leases TBD or" tillage Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village [:]YesONo Planning Board or Commission c. City Council,Town or E]Yes[Z]No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies E:]Yesg]No e. County agencies EZ]YesE]No Soffolk County Planning Comnrission-.239 Referral -rBD f.Regional agencies [:]Yes[Z]No g. State agencies [Z]Yes[--]No NYSDEC-SPDES General Permits and Facility Registration, See bottom of page. h.Federal agencies [Z]Yes[:]No FAA-Notice of Proposed Construction(FAA Filed 912016. Determination of No Hazard to 7460-1 Review) i. Coastal Resources. issued by R"on 11/T2016 i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? [Z]YesE]No Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 0 Yes13No Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? 0 YesE:]No C.Planning and Zoning C.I.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan, local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the [:]YesONo only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I C.2.Adopted land use plans. ...........— a. Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site EZ]Yes[:]No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action E]YesVINo would be located? *The subject properly is a municipal solid waste management facility operating on the subject property since 1987. b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway W]YesE]No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s)� LWRP and 2 CE (Fishers!p!pgq,qr1d Peconic BayAgd Environs) .......... ...... .................... ................—------- ...............—------ ................—---- ........... .......... c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, E-]Yes[Z]No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): ................ ...............—---- ..........-—----- ..... ............---,.... ....... ......... ...... ................. ........... .......... .. ..... .Required NYSDEC Approvals:(1)SPDES Multi Sector General permit for Stormwalei Discharges from industrial Activities(GP 0..17...001)(filing date is peyrnit dependent),(2)SPDES GeneraI Permit For'Storrnivater Disdiarges from Construction A.cGvjty(GP 0 15-002)(filing date is permit dependent),and(3)Genoal per rmt Registration-Consolidation of Facilities(Rccch ed Jan.2017). Page 2 of 1.3 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Residential Low Density,(3,macrel.,n R( 120)___�y b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? Fishers Island School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? New York State Police c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? is ers....sland Fire Department ��.. -� ..........._.—. ... .... d. What parks serve the project site? nN/A...M,unics al„sr9n . r st rra_a ernenlfacArty_ _ .,............... D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Municipal waste handling and management facility(improvements to existing facility) b.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 10.76' acres *Represents 9.33-ac FIWMD-owned parcel,plus b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? +/-2.40 acres 2.7 ac.lease area(from Town),less the 1.27 ac c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned area to be leased to Town. However,project site y pp project is limited to 3.23 ac. or controlled b the applicant or ro'ect sponsor? 9.33' acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ®Yes❑No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % 415+/..(square footage)* *See Below Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes®No If Yes, L Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) out .... n. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes❑No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑YesNo i. If No,anticipated period of construction: 5 months ............... ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated a Anticipated commencement date of phase I (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month _year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: ”ltern D.l.c: .P.roposed action includes an additional 6,900-sf of building area(existing building area:1,650 so for the mixing and maintenance buildings. However,the mixing building accommodates a composting operation that currently takes place and the maintenance building accommodates the Current practice on-site. Page; 3 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses? ❑YesNo If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Familyf(om"or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures 2 ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 25 height; 50 width; and 90 length Mixing Building iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: _ 2,400 square feet New Maintenance Building h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑mGround water❑Surface water streams []Other specify: ...... iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; ares ------.. .............. . _.._....... g ;surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length width vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑YesNo (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock earth sediments etc.)is proposed to be removed ( g from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? escr ,and plans to use, iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dred dredged, p manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ®Yes No If yes,describe. n.n.n_�.......... ... .......... .... _------- v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? . acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: „ b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑'YeSZNo into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): ... Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g. excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: -----. � ...... �. ............. _____ ._... iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments. ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: .,........_. iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing, invasive species control,boat access): m._...... ................. • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used specs roduct s v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes❑No If Yes: 'Based upon water bills for the 2 e_--fisting i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 5"5 gallons/day t i iiiiies. ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ®Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: Fisherso„rks C!raporation Island Water W � • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 0 Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No • Do existing lines serve the project site? 0 Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes ONo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: m.,.... .................. _____ ....... .. ,....... ..... • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve t p [] Yes[Z]No pp y p p he project site. esNo If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: . ............ • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district V. If a public water supply will not be used describe plans to provide water supply for the project:. P pP y P P PP Y P J ....... .......--- ...... Vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private) ...... ,maximum p um ping capacity: N/A gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: L Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 55t gallons/day 'Based upon water bills for the 2 facilities. ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial, if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): Sanitary„uuas!a ter .... n. .. .......... .........iii. Will proposed action use an existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes oIf YeS • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the r _ .......... . �.n.. ty p oject? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: myn„yymm __........... ................. WWWW_._._._. ....................... iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site. ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? _ V. If public facilities will not be used describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): The existing on-site senatery ystem Aorated„ ad centto the existing office/maintenance building would,accommmodsa_nitary waste, ....... ..... . _.vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,rec cle or reuse Ii u...i.d.. .W .. _11. ........ ______ ....... .. e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e. ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stonnwater)or non-point source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: L How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 0.79 acres(impervious surface)(Total impervious area post-development:1.44 acres) Square feet or 10.76 acres(parcel size) n. Describe types of new point sources.bSs0l rmwater would be collected in catch basins and piped to a proposed stormwater detention(infiitration) n. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacentt properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? A stormwater detention(infiltration)basin isro osed for construction. Stormwater infiltration units for roof runoff from the Mixing Building are also proposed. P I? �...... ........ n_... ... _m ........ • If to surface waters i d e n t i fy receivingwater bodies or wetlands: . • Will stormwater run ...._ ____ ..... _.._._. off flow to adjacent properties? n YesNo iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑'Yes❑No £ Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ®Yes❑No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) Delivery/carting trucks. Existing diesel-powered wheeled loader. ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch_,plant, __. . crushers) Construction' .., ve pc.,es and recvcNunq of concrete for reuse. .. ......._.. __..__...,... ............ ._,,n,.. ........... ... iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) Electric generation for grinder, g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, E]Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: L Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO,) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, F]Yes ONo* landfills,composting facilities)?*Proposed aerated static compost piles under a cover system maintains an aerobic process. If Yes: L Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ............................ ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): ............................__ ................ ............. -.................. i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as F]Yesg]No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulate s/dust): ................11111-................ ... ..... .......------------ ...........................—--------------------------------------—-—---------------------------- j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial []Yes ZNo* new demand for transportation facilities or services?'Based on FIWMD activity logs for a peak-day in July and a peak day in September,it is projected that If Yes: the proposed consolidation would generate an additional 9-to-12 cars during a peak-hour. L When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): 0 Morning E]Evening E]Weekend *Ba�cd tit)on FIXVMD f"'10bly El Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: N/A iii. Parking spaces: Existing no formal spaces Proposed 12 Net increase/decrease --—----- "12-------------- iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑YesR]No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: lnlelnatdrjNew,ay to be Mdifled.to-r'leate-a urcull... n ar _.rmit safe,,an.d Of tient s: 5 tj n ar und the facility_ ................................................................................................. Vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within 1/2mile of the proposed site? ZYesE]No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric []Yesg]No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing [:]Yesg]No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand Yes No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ....... ............... 79,350 kWh/year ._......m. ....... ..... ............................ ............................ ........... ............ ................... ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Fishers Island Electric Corporation iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? E]Yes[Z]No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: ..........7:39.a m.75:3.0. pm 0 Monday-Friday: 7:30 am-4:30 pm • Saturday: 7:30 am-5:30 pm(on limited basis) 0 Saturday: mm 7:30 am-4 30 pm ........................___.. .................. • Sunday: No construction 0 Sunday: 7:30 am-3 30 pm.........• ....... Holidays:, ..........I'll.....................................No construction_.. . .- - a Holidays- Closed ------------- ....... ..................... Page 7 of B in.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 0 Yes E]No operation,or both? If yes: L Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: Tempo mrnqi§,e '30 MM--5 .4y�Lqg�O_nslructlo �Zqrmlr_uction would Rgcg(-d-u-eLng-no—n-§@n!�ltjy-e-h-ou-rs-L7,— _ 30�mpyqr ga estimated 5 Mqq Operational noise would occur with the loading and off-loading by hauling trucks,and operafion of equipment. .......... ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? 0 Yes 0 No Describe: n.. Will theproposed action have outdoor lighting? 0 Yes E]No If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Fixed liahtina would be instaHed an the pLqp prqRp— ,A�pq maintenanqgAni-IniKi��qLP sed to serve lightfing would be shielded and directed downwards to mize light trespass H. Will proposed action remove existing n I atura 11 1 1 barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? OYesONo Describe: ... ........ .....-——- o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? []Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures; ...... .......... p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) OYes ONo, or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s)_ per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, 0 Yes ONo insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ii. Will the ro22'sed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? E] Yes E]No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal 0 Yes []No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility-,, • Construction: 0.1 tons per (unit of time)*Proposed reuse of deteriorated concrete- • Operation: 0* tons per............ (unit of time)*See bottom of page. ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: Areas of deteriorated concrete ro osed to be replaced would be reused in the oroposed internal roadwav, ( • Operation: Thep L9p9§gd action wolume of materials,co!pR2sled,thus avai able to the commun!N,�Posed ac0on would also reduce the amount of wastes to be transported off-site for disposal. iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site,. • Construction: No construction materials are peqjqg,��,of off-site. 'q_X • Operation: The FlWMD contracts licensedcarters to tra.nsport waste to off-island facilities in the State of Connecticut. *The FlWMD handles a total ofapproximately 800 tons/yearof wastes generated and received from residents and businesses on the island. Page 8 of 13 s.-Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ® Yes❑ No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): Composting and transfer station for MSW, recyclables,ebulky wastesmand woodlbnlsh.(+/800,t0ns/year) _._.—. ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • +/-67 Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • N/A Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: N/A years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes No waste? If Yes: i. Names of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: m.... ........ _..... m......_. m ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: N. pecify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: V. W111 any hazardous wastes be disposed......_. -- _�sO at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes N ' o If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a ,.,.._ ____"" hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action EA.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. _....... .... .... _.... i, Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban 0 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic 0 Other(specify):Airport,Institutional(School)and Community Center H. If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on thero'ect si p � te.*See Below Land use or Current....... . ..... Acreage After Change Covertype ........ Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 0.65 1.44 +0.79 ......._ ._.... ....... _ _... • Forested 0.51 0.51 0 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) 4 79 4.79 0 • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) 0 0 0 • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 1.04 1.04 0 • (bare rockNon-vegetated ,earth.. g ..or fill) 3.50 ... 1.83 1.67 WW • Other ... Describe:Landscaping/Lawn 0.27 1.15 +0.88 ....._......... ._..... _.. ....... *Upon implementation of the lease agreements,the compost station property(with the proposed transfer station operations)would he 1.0.76:+:acres(9.33- acres F 2.7+acres 1.27..+acres);however,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23±acres,which consists of pawed/impervious,non vegetated and landscaping/lawn areas. Page 9 of B c:Is the project site presently used by members of the community for pu. b_..l_ic _recreation? ❑Yes❑✓ No i. If Yes: explain: ................. .................---........ _._.... .... _._._. .............. d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ®Yes❑No day care centers, or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, L Identify Facilities: The Fishers Island School is located approximately 500 feet to the east of the main entrance driveway to the subject property. The Fishers Island community center is located across Fox Lane to the north and east of the subject property. _ e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: L Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: UL Provide date and summarize results of last ins rection: .._............ _........ f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes❑No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: L Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the .......a. ,....... � solid waste management facility Tie ft used ing isting ion de furniture,mattresses, tc.y,electronic xwastes, ll d scrap metal�Wasteslare then transported rtforr haddlonrgrl usposal atSeivinq llicensed facilities(constintConnecti�cut. �. .._........ iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities N/A-The subwect propert.y.„is�an existinq..solid waste management facility. Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or do p [--]Y..s g• g p es the project site adjoin Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: L Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ®Yes❑ No ITmmmmm remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: L Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Enviromnental Site ®Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ... _..... 1 n......... ... Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID numbers : E] Neither15224 ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑No OYes If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):152241 A,. If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Site 152 41is,Eprt ,Q__VV...bght a 412-acrpmfr trnat., pasta[defense installation_within whirp.t.the suabiect properly usmlo &p..1_n.,. q_(kr the USACE completed a Site Inspection of the Fort under the Military Munitions response grogram and a remedial Investigation(RI)In select areas of overall Fort H.G. frig aFt plop y was reca rtutru rid d` c t nriv i '$`e"l lianr an ti Explosives o oncern( +ECs);ff6 Mwever,no 9Jt s re Eo i'iic i t e su Also,the USACE performed due diligence work under the Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)program. Six USTs and a transformer(not within the project area)are planned for removal by the USACE in FY2017. Page 10 of 13 V. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? FlYesONo • If yes,DEC site ID number: ...... "'' .......... • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g.,deed restriction or easement): .......... • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: ............... ------------ ----- ----—- • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? nYesF]No • Explain: .......... ........................................................................ .................................. ........... ............................ ...... ..... E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ------ ....3.00,feet edrock outcroppings on the project site? FlYesONo If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? ............. c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: RhB Riverhead and Haven sods,Graded,0-8%) 18 % Remaining:Fs(Fill land,sandy)-10%and Es(Escarpments)-3% CuC(Cut and Fill Land,Sloping,8-15%) 53 % These soils are not within the development area. Eiji LaDO�SL ft Saqpjng'-1-80) 17 % ........... ._.......18 ........ ........ d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site. Average: 18 feet*Below grade surface within the project area. ......................................... e.Drainage status of project site soils:O Well Drained: 100%of site .............. EJ Moderately Well Drained: ... .._%of site EJ Poorly Drained —%of site .............................. f Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0 0-10%: 67 °/®of site Represents the slopes on 3.23 acres of the overall 10.76-acre site. All areas outside 0 10-15%: 10 %of site of this project area would remain unaffected(no disturbance or development). 0 15%or greater: 23 %of site ............... g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? E]YesONo If Yes,describe: ................................ h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, OYesE]No ponds or lakes)? Not within Project Site. ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? [Z]Yes[-]No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. N. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, W]YesE]No state or local,agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: 0 Streams: Name Classification a' Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification 0 Wetlands: Name Federal Waters,Tidal Wetlands,NYS Wetland, Fe... Approximate Size NYS Wetland(in a.., Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) NL-1 3 m —--—----- in acres-1.1) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ElYes oio waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: .............. ................................................................... ----------------1.111-11111. ............................................... i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? E]YesZNo ............................ ......................— j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? *The areas of proposed improvements are located outside the too year floodplain. 2]YesE]No k. Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? nYesoNo .................. 1. Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? 0Yes DNo If Yes: i.Name of aquifer:Sole Source Aquifer Names:Nassau-Suffolk SSA ...... ........ Page 11 of 13 ` Page l2ofl3 e. Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ❑Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii.Name: iii. Brief description of attributes Won which .. ........ ... 'p listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for *®Yes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory?"Consnitations with SHPO will be undertaken. g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: L Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: , ..........._.. _ .. ..._. ..� _. _._.__.�.._._.._ . . P h.Is the project site within fives miles of anyffi officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource. If Yes: L Identify resource: ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): id. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: L Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Fishers Island Waste Management District,prepared Applicant/Sponsor Name by KGO Consulting,Inc.,as environmental consultant Date June 29,2017 . . . ..... ...... .. .._...............m.............. Signature l � rte ' — 1 it:e President... ......... Kim i;nena,,M.S.,AICP CEP PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Item A. Description of the Proposed Action The Fishers Island Waste Management District(FIWMD) is a special district of the Town of Southold created for the purpose of providing solid waste handling and management to the residents and businesses of Fishers Island. The FIWMD currently operates two facilities on separate properties,as follows: (1) The transfer station is located at 58 Town Road, Fishers Island and is part of an overall 178±-acre,Town of Southold-owned property(Suffolk County Tax Map [SCTM]No:District 1000-Section 12-Block 1-Lot 18), which includes the Elizabeth Field Airport. The transfer station facility is located on approximately 1.44 acres at the eastern portion of the Town-owned land. The transfer station receives municipal solid waste (MSW) and recyclables,such as corrugated cardboard,bottles,cans,plastic containers,and mixed recyclable fibers, from residents and the limited commercial/business facilities on Fishers Island. (2) The compost station and receiving facility for other wastes is located on an approximately 9.33 acre-parcel of land located at 2760 Whistler Avenue(SCTM No: District 1000-Section 12-Block 1 -Lot 1.1) (hereinafter referred to as the"compost station'or"subject property"),but also occupies a portion of the above-described Town-owned land. Solid waste management activities at the compost station include the following: (1) processing(grinding/chipping)and then composting of brush,logs and yard waste in open windrows which is then made available for purchase by landscapers and residents; (2) receiving of construction and demolition (C&D) debris,bulky wastes (e.g., furniture, mattresses, etc.), electronic wastes ("e-wastes") and scrap metals, all of which are then transported off-Island via licensed carters to various disposal and management facilities in the State of Connecticut;and(3)operation of a swap/reuse area to receive unwanted household items for reuse by others(e.g.,bicycles,furniture,and other similar items). The FIWMD has owned and operated a solid waste management facility on the compost station property for approximately 30 years. Prior to this use,the subject property was utilized for military purposes as part of the larger Fort H.G. Wright and remnants of the batteries and one look-out post exist today. In the mid- century, Fort H.G. Wright was closed as a coastal defense facility and the land was transferred to various entities,including the U.S.Coast Guard,the U.S.Navy,the Fishers Island Union Free School,and the Town of Southold. In 1987,the subject property was transferred to the FIWMD. There is no waste collection or disposal on Fishers Island. All wastes,other than compost,requires transport off the Island via licensed carters to permitted facilities in the State of Connecticut None of the facilities receive or handle hazardous wastes. Rather, once per month, the FIWMD coordinates with licensed carters to pick up household hazardous wastes for appropriate handling and disposal. It is the intent of the FIWMD to consolidate these facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility, which has been owned and operated as a solid waste management facility for 30 years. The proposed improvements would modernize the current operation,including the implementation of single-stream recycling and an increase in wastes that can be composted and taken out of the disposal stream. Also included are site repairs, drainage improvements,as well as improvements to site security. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the 1.44-acre parcel occupied by the transfer station would be vacated and the lease terminated. 1 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Below is a description of the proposed improvements: (A) Transfer Station and Receiving Areas 1. Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. 2. Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes. 3. Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers)for scrap metal and bulky wastes. 4. Relocation of a 240-square-foot(so modular building from the existing transfer station to the subject property for use in collecting residential e-waste, discarded small maintenance equipment [e.g., mowers,trimmers,hand tools],and similar wastes. 5. Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others. A swap area currently exists at the subject property,but items are placed outdoors and susceptible to weathering and damage (which results in reusable items having to be carted off-site for disposal). The swap shop would serve to store and protect reusable items. (B) Composting Operations 1. Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered mixing building for the purpose of indoor processing and mixing organics for composting. The proposed mixing building would be located on the southwest side of the internal roadway,opposite the MSW receiving areas.Within the mixing building would be one or more grinders with hopper and stand to grind food waste,cardboard and other fibers,and a reinforced concrete bin wall area to temporarily hold and mix organics before they are added to the composting process. 2. Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration,moisture control by protecting piles from precipitation,and leachate collection for recirculation into the piles. A mobile control box will be used to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to maintain ideal composting conditions and insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. (C) General Facility and Site Improvements 1. Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building,the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve only as administrative space. Interior renovations and the replacement of select windows are also proposed.' 1 During site plan preparation,the project engineer submitted the preliminary plan to the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) as the subject property is adjacent to the Elizabeth Field Airport In correspondence dated October 24,2016,the FAA determined that the four building corner elevations for the proposed mixing building are not to exceed the following: Northeast Corner-31 feet above ground level(58 feet above mean sea level);Northwest Corner-39 feet above ground level(66 feet above mean sea level);Southeast Corner-25 feet above ground level(52 feet above mean sea level);and Southwest Corner-32 feet above ground level(59 feet above mean sea level). In accordance with the FAA's determination,the building elevations were modified and refiled with the FAA. In correspondence dated November 7,2016,the FAA determined that"...the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not have a hazard to air navigation..." 2 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities 2. Partial replacement ar-d reinforcement of the existing concrete bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guard rails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with relevant OSHA(Occupa-ional Safety and Health Administration) standards. 3. Demolition of the deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations and backfilling of these areas with soil and compacted. 4. Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. S. Improvements to site security, including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter, swing gates at the entry, site lighting and security cameras. All lighting would be designed in accordance with the standards set forth in Chapter 172 of the Town Code (Outdoor Lighting). 6. Installation of a new, one-way, paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the construction of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop-off areas. 7. Installation of a stormwater detention basin, stormwater infiltration units, as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. As a portion of the current facility is situated on Town-owned land, including the site access, the internal paved driveway,attendant shed,concrete pad and portions of the receiving area,the proposed action includes entering into a lease for that area. The proposed lease area is 2.7±acres,although much of this area is and would not be improved. In exchange for the lease of 2.7±acres from the Town,the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town-operated sewer pump station. Upon implementation of the lease agreements,and for the purpose of this environmental review,the FIWMD compost station and receiving property would consist of currently-owned,9.33±-acre parcel,minus the area to be leased to the Town of Southold (1.27± acres), plus the area to be leased from the Town (2.7± acres), which totals 10.76± acres; However,the actual facility or operational area would occupy only 3.23±acres. The proposed action would result in an increase in the area of impervious surfaces by 0.79±acre as well as an increase in the area of lawn,landscaping and planted vegetation (includes the proposed stormwater basin) by 0.88± acre, of which 0.7±acre would consist of a native,ground cover seed mix,left unmaintained. The remaining 0.18±acre would include an area of evergreens at the northern portion of the project site to serve as additional buffering to adjacent residential properties. The proposed action would result in a decrease in the non-vegetated areas by 1.67 acres. There would be no disturbance or alterations to the areas of natural vegetation or wetlands found outside of the project area,but on the overall 10.76±acres evaluated herein. Overall,approximately 2.4 acres of the 3.23±-acre project site would be disturbed. Prior to and during construction, erosion and sedimentation controls would be undertaken to minimize the potential impacts associated with land disturbance activities, including stockpile protection, inlet sediment control devices for storm structure protection, silt fencing,and anti-tracking pads to prevent off-site sediment tracking from construction vehicles. On the west side of the facility,within an area that is currently is comprised of exposed soils as ground cover,the area would be seeded with a native,non-invasive grass mix and an erosion control blanket would be placed thereon to serve as a permanent protective covering during seed establishment. A gravity retaining wall would also be installed. 3 Part Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Based upon records of materials removed from the Island and estimates of materials used in the compost operation, the FIWMD facilities handle approximately 792.5 tons of solid waste per year and there is no projected change in the total volume handled upon implementation of the proposed action. It is important to note that the implementation of single-stream recycling and the improvements to composting facilities would,however,result in an increase in the amount of waste that can be composted,thus reducing the amount of waste to be hauled off-Island for disposal. Item D.2.e. Stormwater Management and Reuse The subject property is without a stormwater management system. The proposed action includes drainage improvements, including the installation of a stormwater detention basin, adjacent to the site access and partially within the right-of-way of Whistler Avenue, as well as the use of stormwater infiltration units for roof runoff. According to the site engineer,the proposed stormwater detention basin has been designed to be the largest that can be accommodated due to the existing concrete structures,foundations and subgrade tunnels,as well as the existing topography and natural areas that are to remain undisturbed. Based on the proposed design, stormwater from an area of approximately 45,000 sf(1.03±acres)would be collected in proposed catch basins along the internal roadway and then piped to a Stormceptor©(or similar)system for pretreatment before discharging to the basin. The proposed action also includes measures for stormwater reuse. Specifically,the proposed stormwater detention basin would also be designed to include a pump system to allow for the reuse of collected and pretreated stormwater, when available in heavy rain events. Such water can be used in the composting operation,if needed,as well as for the wash-down of surfaces, thus requiring no additional water from the public supply for its operations. Rain barrels adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. The proposed stormwater management plan would be subject to approval of the Town of Southold Building Department. Item D.2.c.Water Sunnly Potable water is provided by the Fishers Island Water Works Corporation. There are no new water connections to the proposed maintenance or mixing buildings. Review of water bills from July 2015 through May 2016 indicates that the total combined water usage at the two facilities was 20,101 gallons or an estimated average of 55 gallons per day (gpd). For the purpose of analysis,it is assumed that,upon implementation of the proposed action,the consolidated facility would use the combined volume of water(i.e.,55 gpd)with no projected change to the water demand. Item D.2.d.SanitaEy Disposal Sanitary waste is and would continue to be accommodated on-site via an existing subgrade, individual on-septic system located on the west side of the office/maintenance building. The existing sanitary system was installed in year 2000. Based upon the "Project Density Loading Rates &Design Sewage Flow Rates"set forth by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, the design flow factor for the existing 1,650 sf office/maintenance building is 0.06 gpd/sf(non-medical office space),thus resulting in a calculated generation volume of 99±gpd. However,the actual volume is less based upon the reported water usage in the aforementioned water bills. There is no projected change in sanitary discharge as there are no new systems proposed and there are no increases in staff. 4 Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form-Attachment Fishers Island Waste Management District Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities Item D.2.j. Traffic and Parking The proposed action would result in a reduction in the volume of waste to be transported off the Island,and would therefore result in a decrease in the number of trucks having to visit the Island for waste pick-up and container drop- off. Currently,hauling trucks visit both the transfer station and composting station. From the Fishers Island Ferry pier,trucks travel approximately 3/4 mile to the transfer station. Upon implementation of the proposed action,hauling trucks would travel the approximately 0.2 mile distance from the pier to the subject property,thus removing truck traffic on Whistler Avenue to the transfer station. The proposed action may result in an additional 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour, based upon FIWMD records for the current operations. However, the transfer station is open only half- days on Tuesday,Saturday and Sunday,and closed on Thursday. The proposed consolidated facility would result in the availability of the transfer station to full days during the week and half-days on the weekend. As such, the projected traffic increase is expected to be less than 9-to-12 cars in a peak hour. The proposed project would also create 12 formal parking spaces for patrons to safely park and unload materials. 5 0 0 Ln o ¢ op as a G.b bb I�If� cr� LLJ ° uo l X y um k, fDD ((D ° N S i CD �'i �� / Q. N t CD to fD CD 7 v rt cn O Q. m Du �i 3 N O TI O D1 C'> �r FD N r co O O • • Al • r; • Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY A51E$SMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS L All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law, This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Ercvp ininor exenip aahvis hwhitling Builifing Permits coulwher rr r ra eriot l rr aite rr t lovaledwithin the Qxislalh,'rosion HazardArea. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A p=osed action will b - & gy-alg4gd m to its sign if Ic beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(wbich includes g1l of$ uthold TQwnj. 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in de!gil, listing both suppqrting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shA,I not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 12 - 1 - 1.1 PROJECT NAME Proposed Consolidation of Waste Management Facilities The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Board El Building Dept. K Board of TrusteesEl I Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) F] (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: MIT L21i Nature and extent of action: See Attachment Location of action: 2760 Whistler Avenue,Fishers Island,NY 06390 Site acreage: 9.57 acres Present land use:. Compost Station and Receiving Facility Present zoning classification: R-120 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Fishers Island Waste Management District (b) Mailing address: P.O. Box 22,Fishers Island, NY 06390 (c) Telephone number: Area Code(631 788-7455 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No 1:1 If yes,which state or federal agency? NYSDEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section 1H—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Secttiioyn III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes No 1:1 Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 91 Yes [_.] No ❑ Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria El Yes ❑ No 1:1Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if ncccessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. LTJ Yes No :] Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. LJ Yes 1:1 No No Not Applicable See attached. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No K Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes [:] No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes F-1 No ® Not Applicable e attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. LJ Yes 1:1 No rUIJ Not Applicable See attached. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No © Not Applicable See attached. Fishers Island Waste Management District c/o PREPARED BY KGO Consulting,Inc.,as consultant,attn: TITLE President DATE December 5,2017 Kim Gennaro-Oancea,M.S.,AICP CEP Amended on 811/05 Attachment—LWRP Consistency Assessment Form Proposed Consolidation of Waste Mana ernent Facilities-Fishers Island Waste Management District Description of the Proposed Improvements Introduction The Fishers Island Waste Management District (FIWMD) currently operates two waste management facilities on separate properties: (1)A transfer station located at 58 Town Road,Fishers Island,which is part of an overall 178±-acre,Town of Southold-owned property(Suffolk County Tax Map[SCTM]No:District 1000—Section 12—Block 1— Lot 18),which includes the Elizabeth Field Airport;and (2)A compost station and receiving facility located at 2760 Whistler Avenue (SCTM No: District 1000— Section 12—Block 1 —Lot 1.1)and owned by the FIWMD. It is the intent-of the FIWMD to consolidate these facilities on the site of the compost station and receiving facility. The proposed consolidation would allow the FIWMD to manage services and operations on one property. In addition, the FIWMD would implement programs and best management practices for solid waste management,which includes the construction of certain facilities and undertaking site and infrastructure repairs. A portion of the compost station is situated on Town-owned land, including the site access, the internal paved driveway, attendant shed, concrete pad and portions of the receiving area, and as part of the proposed action and as agreed upon by the Town of Southold,the FIWMD would enter into a lease for that area. The proposed lease area includes 2.71 acres. In exchange for the lease of 2.7± acres from the Town, the FIWMD would lease an area of approximately 1.27±acres at the northern extent of the subject property to the Town as such area contains a Town- operated sewer pump station. Upon implementation of the proposed action,the lease for the transfer station would terminate. Site History and Existing Conditions The FIWMD property functioned as part of a larger military and coastal defense facility (Fort H.G. Wright) and between 1953 and 1959, Fort H.G. Wright ceased operations and the property was transferred to various entities, including the U.S.Coast Guard,the U.S.Navy,the Fishers Island Union Free School,and the Town of Southold. In 1987,the subject property was transferred from the Town of Southold to the FIWMD. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold, two Batteries were used for the burning of brush, construction debris and other materials(other than household garbage). In the early 1990's,the burning of materials was being phased out and the FIWMD was required to invest in cleaning out the Batteries. Specifically, the one bunker in the Barlow Battery, rooms and tunnels in the lower levels of the Batteries were backfilled,and a former railway track was removed and the area was regraded. The existing site conditions include a 1,650-square-foot(sf)office/maintenance garage,as well as concrete structures that were part of the former batteries. The walls create a grade separation for receiving deliveries of bulky waste materials (construction debris, furniture, mattresses, etc.), electronic wastes, and scrap metals at the upper level by residents. Open roll-off containers at the lower level receive the waste materials. The facility also includes a small area where residents can place useable items for reuse by others. Brush, logs and yard wastes are also received, processed and composted on existing concrete and cleared areas. Description of the Proposed Action Below is a description of the proposed improvements as they relate to function. The Expanded Environmental Assessment, September 2017 (EEA), Consolidated Facilities Planning Report(last revised February 2016) and the Waste Control Plan(May 2016)provide an extensive description of the proposed action. Both reports are included in Appendix C of the EEA. 1 Transfer Station and Receiving Areas • Installation of four compactor boxes for MSW,cardboard,and single-stream recyclables. • Addition of portable bins to receive food/organic wastes. • Installation of five open top boxes(roll-off containers)for scrap metal and bulky wastes. • Relocation of a 240-square-foot(sf)modular building from the existing transfer station to the project site for use in collecting residential e-waste, discarded small maintenance equipment [e.g., trimmers, hand tools], and similar wastes. • Placement of a 600-sf pre-engineered storage shed for use by the community to dispose of unwanted items for reuse by others(a"swap shop"). A swap area currently exists at the subject property,but items are placed outdoors and susceptible to weathering and damage(which results in reusable items having to be carted off- site ffsite for disposal). The swap shop would serve to store and protect reusable items. Composting Operations • Construction of a 4,500-sf pre-engineered building for the purpose of indoor processing and mixing of organics for composting(hereinafter,the"mixing building"). At present,composting occurs outdoors. • Installation of two concrete pads with a cover system for the enclosure of the compost heaps. The proposed cover system would provide for controlled aeration and moisture,as well as leachate collection. A mobile control box would be used to monitor the temperature of the composting material while maintaining adequate air supply to maintain ideal composting conditions and to insure the heap does not convert to anaerobic activity. Collected leachate,if any,would be recirculated into the compost program to minimize discharges. A finished concrete compost pad would also be constructed. General Facility and Site Improvements • Construction of a 2,400-sf pre-engineered building adjacent to the existing office/maintenance building for the purpose of providing adequate indoor maintenance, repair and equipment storage space. Upon construction of the new maintenance building,the existing office/maintenance building would be converted to serve as administrative space for the FIWMD while also providing office space for Town personnel when conducting business on the Island. • Replacement and/or reinforcement of the bunker walls, including the installation of pedestrian guardrails along the elevated disposal platforms in accordance with OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)standards.Also proposed is the demolition of deteriorating ceilings of concrete structures in two locations and the backfilling of these areas with soil.' • Installation of a truck scale to use in weighing in-bound and out-bound materials. • Improvements to site security,including the installation of chain link fencing around the facility perimeter, swing gates at the entry,site lighting and security cameras. • Installation of a new,one-way,paved loop driveway extending from the existing access and the construction of 12 formal parking spaces adjacent to the attendant shed near the waste drop-off areas. r The past practice of open burning in the bunkers in combination with routine operations has weakened the walls and upper structures of the bunkers to the point of risk of failure in select areas. As a public access facility,the proposed action includes wall improvements and other safety projects to reduce the risk of injury and bring the site into compliance with OSHA standards. 2 • Installation of a stormwater detention basin, stormwater infiltration units, as well as a pump system and holding tank for on-site stormwater reuse. Rain barrels to be located adjacent to the mixing building are also being considered for the collection of water for reuse in the composting operation. The proposed plan situates new buildings and equipment within the operational areas of the current facility,as well as within areas that have been cleared,graded and/or unvegetated. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling, composting of organic materials, and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State'and the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency'to improve waste management practices. 'New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.Beyond Waste. A Sustainable Materials Management Strategy for New York State. Adopted 12/27/2010. 3 United States Environmental Protection Agency,U.S.EPA Sustainable Materials Management Program Strategic Plan. Fiscal Years 2017-2022. October 2015. 3 Nc0 .-U�". O U 3 '� � .y '� o ti '_"7 � � •.Sti, O ,��, •� �,.�... �, A, 011 14) cd ctl U i 'a, .n 3 �° wi. al tl cn y o �' U .5"U--• �' •r"-. `C >,y b cC U �; 'L V � U , to w o ff— U3 °' o x °' `�4 O cc o o ° Q) a ci t. o ° o 14coo 0 o �, ° zs Q �� 1 � a�r. cN > r .� p 'C L4 c; ami U }~ i U v N fs •i U .� bb U E° ® o W r. b co o o o sy w d .� •C N ° b4 ° o O ,U., F--a ai .Q a' s` ,� p cd vi clj y C w ani «z a y o a c* a t4 ti ° b 14) o 03 o ° 'p n o > to O o U O y o ' ° o U ... O �E'° cd N N N N H ° r. .0 bA �.�" y tl ,� O - Q 'L9 'y to s~ o.Y o 3 b w c �; o ' ° °o o U b o y o � .� b 1 Z,w o 3 �scd ' y ` 3 H a� o cd 3 �' fi, Y O v o sy m �, ° a o_ a2 a 'C Y bo O (n O 3 r-. Q-, 'w N 0, n by � � '"' a4 y�C y w .O cu y P .sr •O O U m N C.' ,.� U O y as y pnhy '"p b0 Cti �, Y O k m U T Y a� bA•7-1 Ocd O U ®w Pi O ^" o o o o c° ° a`i =d x u ° cd y `° � o `ti o as c> iE oo s- .� ca b Y N C7 -a cn Y r.0 0 � ° � � ,� � o w .b aw�+ 40y •¢` H aU+ �.' 6 '9 ^'�'i 'r' cd v„ gin + o C7 'L9 U ti Ycd -lz ,w ',�', " � •m °' „m as.� w . •°° �a� a� 3 0„�U xm a� � :: ,� � � .90 cd O oa > w n '0 _ � o oacl .n W cu O o o °say °' �? w al Va x u: i. Q o v s o . o y y °' o Y ' .� r. o r~ a I a� p " U30 ° i . '� °� . � � oo � � wo � o Al � � � � � oo � o ° r. 'o a s� o b fl b . b a o °' ° ' ° 6�n.° ° o y Z �' c d Q o > y ccs a� U .y n U > o s.., 3 � A - y ti `m � O 'L7clia+ C/] 4'1 N •�"' N �' N ry 'U U U V U A •p �, 0 .fl rn o 31 n^ 3 b o o �bTn W own Fye, ° a°�i v o > O o L bl O •�, Lrr m N Q ,.; s.., Gi,'O p¢' Q°q¢pya R> bn0O cd P.N cs 3 -c! cd � < e oti d Oo s ° b 0 C'4 � 24 � �o o ci,N bo.o d) n mo � > >a p0 o J� cc to «, y„ N Fj ti C E— Bn nai U cs GUtNN °ell 3 > n .., U > p O a v o c o A On w � � a w w0 p 0 U ll cu O y G, Ow0 y m cd M4 G &. U •� U w 'v y N O g' ° >O O C/] Lia ' nOm N O N E N V y y Y 0 1.44 CCI N Pa W b v a, awi E b a rn C v O ^+ N V A 01 b N 0 U b ryS U V co o -0 N cd NY N u cC 0 d ? � Cd C�. N cd o 0 = 0 a� 2 "Cl " o ma = a' w b o � � �, o W bn Y 'A o 4) po on b Cd 0 � o o d o 20 cd O o > 3 ��? ' o W o o Y o > d bq�_ o bU 3 Y o ° > o •-. •� O bD'� U at � U .� Q O H Q. N w U Y +-' Y O � .mow ° 03a. ``� ^ �* cd `° Id b o � F" Nd ' o d o c a w 'd �„ .'= `P '� r°" 'd o O a�"i Y y O a0i CIOQ) .� cNYi W" Cc, 04 o 'Y 'Zi y ~ w p V] .°' ° o o. o A ° 0 3 N `" -o 3 3 a o U o '3 _° r. > as 0 Cd W bA }, 'b O O .b Q.Y :�. 1� O Y L: cC w cG W Cl 0 b ° YY w *rY o o t� o oCd 0 �' o ' WYF" •� ob o p ... ^cC „ o � � N �o 'Q.•�oUeIu� Z ' U C; O ,b O Y > fes. O `� ° Q y o " p ° ° �oQ o �oo El 0 3 b�q•{^�. N Y O N om. 0O 'b .O .O acC-. p c0 — N �". " O C's 0 X! �" v> > N O p, 'Lf m Y .f].YO Y U .0 N 'O T1 O y o a> ° o � . y y q w 4. Cdw � 0 O k3wo O vO 3 O cd , . c oc�a b �a> [� o � � coo Of Yp w° ' O O 0Y X ° ow I—uotaO 0 0 obo N Cc as O U Np > O bbA � cd L oo M O y> 0 CD 1-4 Y w . m O cC cd O brn y . •� d c.GdI 0°4 U� � LQ N N ' b yOr k cd U N bD Ow b OrO � O O YU y ¢, Ocd O o 0 ami ami :Y ° >� -•� O Cd £'i N -•' 'b �. 3 i .�' Y O a >, ti-' N Go NCd w > 0- > Cd to d O yy O ° ' O b0 Ud .b „ ° p w o o to.- oo .so :;3P4 o > Cd Cd _ w O3 Nmn Z3 mv En OC's ° O O 00 'iU' U `d w p '~ 2 0 �”' A `n C o N �,Y cd ti rn N y Y •y N cd y }' O O p,n �••� U .., �..� 1401 3 '^ •� rn Y p w o U x 0 �, 3 Z ° O N .3 r,. ate•+ 04 N p 0 y > po � v3d O U b , O m oac b OO • Obo O � � • • .Yco " -0Y .2 p. + i , - 9 a, Yp w 0. o — . , OS � � b ¢ cd ° ' FN � O U o.i � ...... C p � ;.d Y O y '�, ti ¢, m U o ° °� �% bq. :ty .°: O a� U v, ,acrd a� 0oo � Uy o � oa � � � b � ' - E cd oR °' � vim- o � Y `� o oQy w ' ami yb � O °' o °' .0- o . Aw � ` cz y 'b s1 u y o � io � N3- d ° 4Q. bi °. bncd ` 4, •c�" y, +m' >' a�.O'Ua•a�ote,, fU -+o�' bW WCi aU O. d b0 rO pp N 0 y ~ -w 0b � y4• O N O coi . QNOpCd ° D N 0as bo O � U> b m Cm cd o > U OUN b 0 a� cd ti w bo cdy c O a� o 0 0 � o � o o c p o o o b � cn u •2 o o �5 Ab N Cdo Wo ,oma Y o o c a W RI Y U3 C-' v b0 b U U U U > a) S.'. WCd O N N O p O O b .� O U rn w a) Q. 0to cd U2 --0U,� 0 .- po M 0 VP b � Y s7 v 0 U ° ; o m °� p O - 0 � y � O CL � a) N +0-' m M Q Y -o a) - 3 0 CZ O 171 >l >l >7 on r Y Q 0 b o°'n o ' u O g cc :! >,O +� a> P.. y `+-� O >"bp ami c .b G cd O O y a�x "Cl0+ i0 O tom, ti N .� b0 N P•" s. •° s. •° $.. ° i. •° bcC o N) 3 o . p 0, o Ca ° (Z o W o M �; ° o . o Y o o s, Cd O"= O 0 o o o o NO.o ° b o 0 a� 0 0 0 0 °O ° 0 3 0 0 0 0 �. 0 0 o b � a °Y' 4 fl � o 0 y -� 3 c b 3 c - •� " � 0 0 v Y 0 �'U4 r. y Ski 0 •'•� U Cd 'U N •Vl p O Cl GL GL 0. 0 .Y S: a) y �,Y O W .V f. O 0 0 0 0 cd Cd (n Cd (D .y Cd •O Cd 0 cc Y cd Y 't Y Cd Y U }I W Cd Y 0 > 3 a) - WO '� CO Y 0 0 0 O CCS P ed Q cd 9 w 9 0 Cd I..i S•i 0 �"1 O SZI -.- M O y Y 'moi a y >1 Y >1 y >1 y >1 0 0 a0• i A 3 E ati U b � � Yom. � w .V M .� � .0 M .p a 0 °P 4 y n Y b O °' 0 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 ., p .�.., p w aJ t, W cd p •N +� cd W ' 0 G O bD 0 to N W 0 C U U U 5 0 c• 0 C>~ bD Y U yaj to a) P m y O y ti w ti ce O r•�.. 0421 ow cd 0 � c b cels a� Q a� Q a� Q a> Q V ` •1-1 U b U �..1 5 M0 f-1 •11 Y Y • 0 s S"+ w'1 cdcd .P bAP 0 'C3 y0 cYd 'P r3 ilt , U b •� O O 0 .�.1 � p Cn U O O w w 0 3 C y Cd Cd .�Y -A. ocid " s: .. O 0 Y CLO O ti b a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o � Gl C) o y C 0 o4, o� o� o4, 0 .Oi0, ow �cC O> o cPd 0" � •0i'� p, � � � � 0 � •� 3 0 0 U0--1 0 � 0 � 0 "c o O s� y " cd yCd cz, a� w }, � o o w 0 w •N �0.� CL 0 .b N C V] N �^+• co N Q rb N y, 0 Y 0 Q H b Cd H 3 ai `+" H w W CPd H W � O v. 0 � W •� W Y P. '� O ❑ Y O 0 p 0 Cd p 0 p 3 0 > y 0 d H b cW � y y O . >, 0 0 -00 > , Ad •cd b' " up o A. M w -O 0 oc� O 0P O 0 0 'w ° W04 1-4 O ' °o d a �m = °oNb SW Cd CCd a CZ 0 at 0 0 bo 00cd bb ob00 o 03Yo ° 0O � o > _ a0. c� b � 3 a � H � a ? F° a wb E 0 ao Cd a ti U i --rNEWYORK Parks, Recreation, TATEOF OPO TUNITY. and Historic ANDREW M.CUOMO ROSE HARVEY Governor Commissioner June 29, 2017 Mr. Jim Wade Environmental Engineer 2 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Circle Road Stony Brook University Stony Brook , NY 11790 Re: DEC Fishers Island Waste Management District- Consolidation of Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue at Fox Lane, Fishers Island, NY 17PRO2934 Dear Mr. Wade: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review of the project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act(New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8)and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR Part 617). We note that the Butterfield Battery and the Barlow Battery are contributing resources to the Fort H.G. Wright Fishers Island Historic District which is eligible for listing on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. The resource evaluation is attached for your use. Since the batteries are historic and based upon our review of the submitted information, we offer the following comments: 1. Please provide additional information regarding potential impacts to the existing historic batteries. In particular we note that the proposed mixing building may impact one of the batteries. 2. Please provide additional information regarding the impact of the proposed compactors upon the historic batteries. 3. Our Archeology Unit has no archeological concerns. Additional correspondence should be provided via our Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS)at www.nvsparks.com/shpo/online-tools/Once on the CRIS site, you can log in as a guest and choose "submit" at the very top menu. Next choose "submit new information for an existing project".You will need this project number and your e-mail address. Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www.nysparks.com If you have any questions, I can be reached at(518)268-2181. Sincerely, � Beth A. Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator e-mail: beth.cumming@parks.ny.gov via e-mail only enc: resource evaluation Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www.nysparks.com IOppNRK E of® Tld�6Parks, Recreation TV- ANDREW .CUOMO Y Governor Commissioner RESOURCE EVALUATION DATE: 5-25-17 STAFF: Lorraine Weiss PROPERTY: Former Fort H.G.Wright ADDRESS: Fishers Island,Town of Southold COUNTY: Suffolk PROJECT REF: 17PRO2934 USN: 10310.001406,Fort H.G.Wright, Fishers Island Historic District USNs Contributing: 10310.000944 Fort H G Wright Officers Quarters/Bohas House,Whistler Ave 10310.000945 Fort H G Wright Officers Club&Quarters/Now Res,Whistler Ave 10310.000946 Fort H G Wright Service Club/Theater,Whistler Ave 10310.000947 Fort H G Wright Bakery,Tyler Ln 10310.000948 Fort H G Wright Non Commissioned Officers Quarters,Tyler Ln 10310.000949 Fort H G Wright Coast Guard Station, Greenwood Ave 10310.001305 NUWC Annex B-111 Fort Wright Battery 111,Oriental Ave 10310.001306 NUWC Annex B-212 Fort Wright Battery 11 I Plotting Room,Oriental Ave, 10310.001455 Hoffman Battery,Fox Lane 10310.001456 Hamilton Battery,Fox Lane 10310.001457 Barlow Battery,Fox Lane-West Of 10310.001458 Butterfield Battery,Fox Lane-West Of 10310.001459 Dutton Battery,Whistler-South Of 10310.001460 Marcy Battery,Whistler-South Of,Ne Of Runway 10310.001461 Fort H G Wright-Ordinance Building/Engineer Building,Fox Lane 10310.001462 Fort H G Wright Residences,Winthrop Avenue 10310.001463 Quartermaster Storehouse(Signal?),Fox Lane 10310.001464 Former Camp Area, Se Of Airport 10310.001465 Fort H G Wright Parade Ground,Whistler Avenue-South Of Non-contributing: 10310.001299 Fishers Island Jr-Sr High School(C 1970), 19 Greenwood Rd 10310.001444 USCG Sardet (Seawall,Non Contributing) 10310.001450 Elizabeth Field Airport, 500 Airport Road, 06390 10310.001454 Waste Management Facilities(North Of Barlow And Butterfield Batteries)Non Contributing 2000 Bldg,Whistler Avenue At Fox Lane 10310.001466 Fort H G Wright Clinton Battery,Whistler Avenue-South Of 10310.001467 Fort H G Wright Hoppock Battery,Beach Road Continued Fort H.G.Wright,Fishers Island 2 Resource Evaluation I. ❑ Property is individually listed on SR/NR: name of listing: ❑Property is a contributing component of a SR/NR district: name of district: II. ®Properties meet eligibility criteria. ❑Property contributes to a district which appears to meet eligibility criteria. Pre SRB: ® Post SRB: ❑ SRB date: Criteria for Inclusion in the National Register: A. X Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. X Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; D. ❑ Have yielded,or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. III. ❑Property does not meet eligibility criteria. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Buildings and structures associated with Fort H. G. Wright are eligible for listing on the State and National Register under Criterion A for their association with the new era in the development of nationwide seacoast defense facilities under the Endicott Board, led by Secretary of War William Endicott; and under Criterion C for the engineering and design of the mortar batteries designed for surface and air defense, and as an example of Colonial Revival style military installations. Fort H.G. Wright was established at the western end of Fishers Island in 1898 after long negotiations with the Ferguson family,who owned the property. It was part of the US Army Coast Artillery Corps Coast Defenses of Long Island Sound, later known as Harbor Defenses. It was named in memory of Major General Horatio G. Wright(1820-99), a West Point graduate, Civil War commander, and Chief of Army Engineers from 1879-1884. The first structures completed were Butterfield,Barlow, and Dutton "disappearing gun"batteries. Beginning in 1900, the fort was expanded with both permanent and temporary structures during the early 20th century and also served as a training facility for artillery troops and West Point students until it was declared inactive in 1949. The period of significance is 1898 to 1949. Continued Criterion A The Spanish-American War prompted the expansion of sites to protect the Connecticut coast and Long Island Sound according to standards developed by the Endicott Board. The Endicott system was created to attack enemy warships from fortifications mounted in concrete that were not visible from the water. This attack would stop an invasion and allow Navy vessels the time necessary to reach and engage the enemy. The first in which this weapon system was armed and ready was for the Spanish-American War in 1898.1 Fort H.G.Wright,Fishers Island 3 Resource Evaluation In addition to the technological advances, the layout of the forts themselves evolved from compact defense sites for short-term use to entire communities comprised of both"tactical"and"non-tactical" buildings. The center of the non-tactical area of a coast artillery fort was the parade ground. Officer's quarters were sited on one side of the parade ground, while barracks were placed on the other, at a lower elevation, ifpossible. The administration building or harbor defense headquarters was given a prominent location on the parade round, as were the commanding officer's quarters, the flagpole, and b(nidsttmd.- Most of the non-tactical structures at the forts constructed during the Endicott-Taft period were designed to be permanent structures. These wood frame buildings were built on stone foundations with slate roofs, sided with local brick, clapboard, or stucco. The Quartermaster Corps architect's office created standard plans for all types of buildings. Those designed at the turn-of-the-century—when most Coast Artillery forts were constructed—were of Colonial Revival style with elements of Queen Anne style in the officers'quarters.3 d ag NaAaaA Ar�w�J+d�'d�A, !'W@nb!b+Xd°NI°,*'�' ro.ApeAeora n �p\va wwC wwmre a�r� rANCWA rOR T H.G.WRIGHT= / S.soap erALcoaatORda�'caar� �A � Aae�Ae�s. m ma CUARD NOW r P647 Z*mm ..V OB/*"E POLE&. /W �n" V. " ee �r'K6�9 yyu r.��u "fIY�' m I a y w �. �m me'.--h— V702 �esAAr�As} uas A® �A �r s.a�w �� ''"° $gY'�Wr ��w � +.a' b,,,r�aap�i; aM ■r kwarn4y Iu"a�p �a N �� o' 0M9Aa.x��nm Gx�ronrnw8 'Ages 4a, d rn,7n. d ' d&k . " ra9a d ` � VAPa 4 �AArc �ea8A r a9 P Ra MASON � 00 dY fto pfewpocte._ A SAtt .d rA 110 �u pn mom WZP e�wc'as.wwaw X �. eMp� rF A � c e mciarw gw r k %� . 0 "4 T as ev. our r„ sV", ,au ,.,1 M,� rw I�1D°'uTMMd A 1Z FF.Awarcwd gas f4. air Urdu H t �...a ' d aa�Ar�wceaata +» WOO, G- ate. „ 0rA6acol MOR88.. R 8.. Y "mr�rr �•suwb""\\ ema"AZAV J 1921 Map of Fort Wright According to a 1958 report of the Headquarters First US Army, Fort Wright"became the headquarters of the Coast Defense of Long Island, with Forts Terry, Michie, Trumbull, Mansfield and Tyler as units in the command." Fort H. G. Wright served as the coast and heavy artillery training center for Army and National Guard Units and West Cadets. Of all the installations within the outer rink of metropolitan defenses, Fort H. G. Wright was the most self-sufcient and best organized. The installation was equipped with its own electric power system. The fort had its own 4 farms and its own transportation system. Fort H.G.Wright,Fishers Island 4 Resource Evaluation The remaining elements of Fort H. G. Wright which retain structural integrity and reflect both the technological and social innovations of this period of coastal defense systems include the Hoffinan, Hamilton,Barlow, Butterfield, and Marcy Batteries; the residences along Whistler Avenue, Winthrop Avenue, and Greenwood Road; tactical and non-tactical buildings including the arsenal, bakery and other buildings in the area between Fox Lane and Greenwood Road and north of Fox Lane;the theater on Whistler,the former parade ground south of Whistler Avenue; and WWII-era Elizabeth Field Airport, the property of which includes the remnants of the Camp Buildings east of the runways near the south coast. Criterion C En qtr g. The new form of weaponry developed by the Endicott Board addressed the naval defense needs at the turn of the 19th century as weaponry and tactics had advanced after the Civil War. The board... aawde eaxteiish,e the d st�W of the�)ei,,' (k,,1 a?,yes. Goiie viyere the fare°-e eys).rosea1 )its a aaeraawia7g.niaam,e°aaaaaaaraa. Irasleaad, they sle i,r de aases ae°c-ire.viialler, mountedfincer ,aaaaas Mid va,'ere dispersed, Poured concrete arms s°tee l replaced bricks, 'Vpea , also aaarade e teaash,ea use qfdirt, s°caaaara awi v,eagetaatiaraa to hiaader obser~wPaatieraaja•oara thesea aaaad absorb hits ft<rraa shells.' "iidieolt weauj)oa irr used wvra , aaccluraate rilled disaj.)pearbig e°caaufoa a,s, r aarici fire'ayaans, saabaaaaari•ier aaertso utid'ea wurcate r aaabaes, as id seaar(.1 anilght, . The guns u ereN .:t-ipic a to 12-hich Baa c abber araad had as raaaas,e of'7 to 9 iyiiks. The raarrdeaaa aage had beguii with e°eraicrete as id electn"Ctll` used in cd"eA�a�aas°ens°.�(aa thea.°rst th?m s Fort H.G.Wright Endicott Period Battery' Battery No. Caliber Type Mount a `ce e s Bautu Cost' liattrr% 1)%natnite (-1) 1 15" Pneumatic Unknown ? Battery Clinton 8 12" Mortar 1900-1902-1902-1943 $ 114,895 Battery Butterfield 2 12" Disappearing 1898-1900-1901-1945 $ 110,000 Battery Barlow(2) 2 10" Disappearing 1898-1900-1901-1939 $ 110,000 Battery Dutton 3 6" Disappearing 1898-1900-1901-1945 $78,000 Battery Hamilton(2) 2 6" Disappearing 1903-1905-1905-1917 $52,250 Battery Marcy 2 6" Disappearing 1903-1906-1906-1917 $50,000 Battery Hoffman 2 3" Pedestal 1902-1904-1904-1946 $ 13,471 Battery Hoppock 2 3" Pedestal 1903-1905-1905-1946 S 17,250 Table Source Coastal Defense Study Group The circular concrete forms with stepped sunken cores and connecting underground facilities were incorporated into the terrain of Fishers Island. This formation is still visible at those batteries which retain structural integrity: Hoffinan,Hamilton, Barlow, Butterfield, and Marcy. During World War 1, guns at some of these coastal defenses were dismantled in preparation for shipment to France. However, the war ended before they were actually activated. On Fishers Island, Hamilton and Marcy batteries were dismantled and never re-installed. Changes in air combat rendered the network of batteries inadequate by the end of World War H. Fort H.G.Wright,Fishers Island 5 Resource Evaluation ,rclihecture. Tactical buildings appear to be grouped at the north end of the fort, east of what was Silver Eel Cove. These are mainly 2-story, side-gabled,red brick structures and include the Non- commisioned Officers Quarters, Quartermaster Storage, Ordinance Building, and"engineer"buildings, The bakery is a red brick, 1-story, cross hipped roof structure. The Coast Guard facility located at the end of Greenwood Avenue north of Fox Lane also dates from the period of the fort and is a component of the district. Constructed c. 1901 and improved in 1916, it is a red brick, 1-story,H-shaped,hipped roof building with 8 x 12 windows and stone sills. The louvered, octagonal cupola has a copper dome and finial. The station is in the US Coast Guard 1 st District, Sector Long Island Sound,it is manned and controlled by USCG Station New London on a seasonal basis. In contrast to other parts of Fishers Island where buildings conform more to the topography, the remaining residential structures associated with Fort Wright are arranged in rows of evenly spaced lots, usually along a straight roadway. The red brick, masonry or frame buildings retain Colonial Revival features including side-gabled, cross-gabled, or hipped roofs, some with dormer windows; double-hung, multi-paned sash; a few bay windows; one-story porches with roofs supported by simple single or multiple Doric columns; and simple entablatures, cornice returns, and pediments at rooflines and over dormer windows. Most are 2- or 2.5-story buildings on raised basements. South of the main residential row along Whistler Avenue are the remains of the recreational facilities, including the theater and open land that was once the site of baseball and softball fields. The former parade ground south of Whistler Avenue remains an open area. 1 "The Endicott Era Defenses,"National Park Service,www.nps.gov/gate/learn/historyculture/endicotteradefenses.htm 2 Berhow,Mark Eastman Joel and Smith Bolling,"Barracks Bakeries and Bowling Alleys Non-Tactical Structures at American Coast Artillery Forts."p. 1;http://cdsg.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/FORTS/CACunits/CAGarrison.pdf 3 ibid.,p.8 4 "Long Island's Eastern Shield"Release No. 15-58, 14 January, 1958,Headquarters US Army,Information Section, Bldg.A-6,Governors Island,New York 4,NY. From East Hampton Free Library,file LL207 5 The Endicott Forts—19th Century Homeland Security, http://exploringoffthebeatenpath.conVPortsFortsandB attles/EndicottForts/index.html 6 "The Endicott Era Defenses,"National Park Service,www.nps.gov/gate/learn/historyculture/endicotteradefenses.htm 7 Information from Coastal Defense Study Group shown on "Fort H.G.Wright,"http://fortwiki.com/Fort—H.G. Wright NEWYORK TAT , OPPORTUNITY. and, Historic Preservation ANDREW M.CUOMOROSE HARVEY Governor Commissioner August 4, 2017 Mr. Jim Wade Environmental Engineer 2 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Circle Road Stony Brook University Stony Brook , NY 11790 Re: DEC Fishers Island Waste Management District-Consolidation of Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue at Fox Lane, Fishers Island, NY 17PRO2934 Dear Mr. Wade: Thank you for continuing to consult with Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. We have reviewed the additional information provided in the July 7, 2017 letter from KGO Consulting, Inc. Based upon this review, we understand that the proposed new construction will not directly impact the historic Butterfield and Barlow Batteries. Further that these Batteries will continue to be used for the current usage. As a result of this review, it is OPRHP's opinion the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries. 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction. We recognize that these Batteries have been used for waste management purposes for over 30 years and the Battery structures have been impacted by this use. Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline. Additional correspondence should be provided via our Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS) at www.nysparks.com/shpolonline-too,is/Once on the CRIS site, you can log in as a guest and choose "submit" at the very top menu. Next choose "submit new information for an existing project". You will need this project number and your e-mail address. Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www.nysparks.com If you have any questions, I can be reached at (518)268-2181. Sincerely, A�Le 414" � Beth A. Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator e-mail: beth.cumming@parks.ny.gov via e-mail only Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189-(518)237-8643-www.nysparks.com GO Consulting, Inc. Environmental Consulting Services 626 RXR Plaza Uniondale,New York 11556 (516)522-264.5 July 7,2017 ELECTRONIC FILING-VIA CULTURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM Ms.Beth A.Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189 Waterford,New York 12888-0189 Re: Fishers Island Waste Management District-Consolidation of Facilities OPRHP Project No.17PRO2934 Dear Ms.Cumming: As the environmental consultant to the Fishers Island Waste Management District (FIWMD), this correspondence is being submitted to provide the information requested in your correspondence dated June 29, 2017 for the above-referenced project. Specifically, the June 29 correspondence included two comments and each are addressed below. Comment- Item 1: Please provide additional information regarding potential impacts to the existing historic batteries. In particular,we note that the proposed mixing building may impact one of the batteries. Response: For 30 years,the former Butterfield and Barlow Batteries have been part of the current solid waste facility, although the waste handling practices have evolved over time. As indicated in Figure 1 as well as the site photographs provided herein,the former Butterfield Battery consists of two bunkers and each are used to hold roll-off dumpsters that receive wastes deposited from above. This use will not change after the proposed improvements are completed. The former Barlow Battery consists of one bunker used as a temporary storage area for shredded logs and brush. A second bunker was filled with concrete and brick rubble over time. The historic tunnels in the two Batteries were also filled and are no longer accessible. At the time of acceptance of land from the Town of Southold, the two Batteries were used for the burning of brush,construction debris and other materials(other than household garbage). In the early 1990's, the burning of materials was being phased out and the FIWMD was required to invest in cleaning out the Batteries. Specifically,the one bunker in the Barlow Battery,rooms and tunnels in the lower levels of the Batteries were backfilled,and a former railway track was removed and the area was regraded. Also performed at that time was ground area sampling and soil removal in areas within the property,in coordination with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The past practice of open burning in the bunkers in combination with routine operations has weakened the walls and upper structures of the bunkers to the point of risk of failure in select areas. Since the facility is needed to serve residents of the Island,the planned wall improvements and other work will reduce the risk of injury plus bring the site into compliance with OSHA standards. KGO In regards to the proposed mixing building, as indicated in Figure 1 and the Overall Layout Plan previously submitted,it would be situated to the west of the former Barlow Battery in an area that is unvegetated. As such, the proposed location of the mixing building would not impact the existing concrete areas(upper or lower levels of the Battery). Based on the above,it is respectfully submitted that the two Batteries have been substantially affected and/or modified by past practices and current operations and,therefore,the proposed action would not impact historic resources. Comment-Item 2: Please provide additional information regarding the impact of the potential compactors upon the historic batteries. Response: The lower level of the former Butterfield Battery are currently used to store roll-off dumpsters and bulky wastes,and the proposed compactors (which are also roll-off dumpster units) would be situated in these same areas. The proposed repairs and reinforcement of the walls and upper structures are not associated with the proposed location of the compactors or reconfiguration of the roll-off dumpsters,as such work would need to be undertaken absent the proposed consolidation and overall plan for the solid waste management program. Also,as indicated in the Response to Comment 1,the Batteries have been modified and impacted from past burn practices in combination with the current operations, as well as the backfilling of one bunker, tunnels and rooms for the purpose of providing the current receiving and composting services. Accordingly,it is respectfully submitted that the location of the proposed compactors would not impact the Batteries. It is also important to note that the proposed design situates new buildings and equipment within the operational areas of the current facility,as well as within areas that have been cleared,thus limiting the area of land disturbance and the clearing of natural vegetation. The proposed improvements would also support changes to the solid waste management practices of the FIWMD by, among other things, allowing for the implementation of single-stream recycling,composting of organic materials,and improving its reuse areas. All of these proposed changes are consistent with the recommendations of both New York State' and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyz to improve waste management practices. The FIWMD would welcome your visit to the subject property to observe the above-described site conditions. If you would like to discuss further,please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you. Sincerely', Kim Gennaro-Oancea,MS,AICP CEP President enc. 'New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.Beyond Waste. A Sustainable Materials Management Strategy for New York State. Adopted 12/27/2010. 2 United States Environmental Protection Agency,U.S.EPA Sustainable Materials Management Program Strategic Plan.Fiscal Years 2017-2022. October 2015. 2 V I V z A a „th. C) 0 z fj M pp A �a z A w A ��, ✓ (A �r , W H f o �--� LU w ,0 W Q co U) H C� H 0%p// rY"M w : r� �ij;� '� ��✓ j�� a �D �,� /// +1 /,, � Yzr kyr � � w 41 CIA bD �iiii �,J�� °n✓r '. y ��' ' W Z R4, O .i..{ 4-J V.y 4-J b O U 1 I. `11 ��,i�liiuuuuuuuuuuuuumlllllll i Z O x o t O W LL i dr fin ` 9iV Jin , �i x j��' ,!ICY , � g ✓�� fif;�� , ter- Q Z -4 i —4 W rn a V � O � E"4 O x W z H z O u mgm x ui I cu ' I w p r-I '%%///ji ////iji W1 cz Z W � riHr a °+J' 4.j o w O a / r y a -J � Q CA �flllji s '� K.T. O r I IV /iii; it I H Oi a w j a � w O tV Q O H O x vi P4 O H U Q w j U w O O w z O U O cu N cz / J; o I I� I; I ly I i I I f j H a 0 0 x p WA W o MN- / W CD p" C jai � w / W cC O �I l i w cJ 4-+ O 4-J U O �%%iii rM V) ��%%%//%/ �7 Ct W .O G G. bA o w n a Y'it Ty�f M � � a I' w .� rr LI r, A� ups//r / m 4 4, // Co r / i/, u n /r At ✓ /i j W V � �,•� *' ur r' y, CD ez O 'x i /.. Q) 4-J w rr ++ UrA /ri W 0 � ' /I i r ),/" /i✓ / �'�,v /i r / / 94 i '// E14 i GL n J �� r'��/✓l� f� ,��119i/�/si�y�r N,i r r/ TATE OF' NEWYORK r O POETUNITY_ and Historic Preservation ANDREW M.CUOMO ROSE HARVEY Governor Commissioner August 4, 2017 Mr. Jim Wade Environmental Engineer 2 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Circle Road Stony Brook University Stony Brook , NY 11790 Re: DEC Fishers Island Waste Management District-Consolidation of Facilities 2760 Whistler Avenue at Fox Lane, Fishers Island, NY 17PRO2934 Dear Mr. Wade: Thank you for continuing to consult with Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. We have reviewed the additional information provided in the July 7, 2017 letter from KGO Consulting, Inc. Based upon this review, we understand that the proposed new construction will not directly impact the historic Butterfield and Barlow Batteries. Further that these Batteries will continue to be used for the current usage. As a result of this review, it is OPRHP's opinion the proposed work will have No Adverse Impact upon historic resource provided the following conditions are met: 1. Plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements to the Batteries will be submitted for our review and comment prior to the initiation of work on these Batteries. 2. A construction protection plan will be put in place to protect the historic Batteries during the new construction. We recognize that these Batteries have been used for waste management purposes for over 30 years and the Battery structures have been impacted by this use. Our intention with the above conditions is to respect the historic footprint of these structures which has survived and contributes to the history of Fort H.G. Wright. The purpose of our review of plans and specifications for the planned wall improvements is to retain this historic footprint outline. Additional correspondence should be provided via our Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS) at www.nysparkscom/sh!po/online-:toois/Once on the CRIS site, you can log in as a guest and choose "submit" at the very top menu. Next choose "submit new information for an existing project". You will need this project number and your e-mail address. Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237-8643•www.nysparks.com If you have any questions, I can be reached at(518)268-2181.. Sincerely, /'C'e W Beth A. Cumming Senior Historic Site Restoration Coordinator e-mail: beth.cumming@parks.ny.gov via e-mail only Division Historic P.O.Box 189,Waterford,New York 12188-0189•(518)237www.nysparksxom