Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMatt-A-Mar By The Bay 1 *.aevYv LAW OFFICES 5 WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, PO BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM(06=02) MATTITUCK,LONG ISLAND ERIC J BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM SUITE 1 11 LYNNE M.GORDON MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 ---- TELEFAX NO 631-298-8565 631-249-9480 wwblaw@aol.com TELEFAX NO 631-249-9484 August 9, 2006 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning F Board r 1 Main Road f Southold,NY 11935 rl i—��^ i l k!k4 2006 ` . , AUG 1 Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Building Department , P.O. Box 1179 __J Southold,NY 11971 ' Re: Love Lane Acquisition Corporation D/B/A Matt-A-Mar By The Bay Shipyard,New Suffolk,NY 11956 SCTM # 1000-117-0818 Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Mr. Verity: I am writing to you on behalf of the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee. It is our understanding that the Planning Board has been advised by the Building Department that the Planning Board does not have jurisdiction over the replacement of a sanitary system in kind for the existing restaurant. We further understand that the Planning Board has decided not to review this existing system under SEQRA. Yesterday,we found that an application had been submitted to the Health Department on March 3, 2006 to expand the existing restaurant from 55 seats to 98 seats (13 bar seats,45 indoor restaurant seats, and 40 outdoor seats), and to expand the existing sewage disposal system. The plans also show 20 existing boat slips and about 2,084 sq. ft. of dry storage area. In light of this information, we request that you reconsider this matter, as the proposal is clearly to expand the restaurant and the septic system to almost double the existing size. We do not believe this was revealed to the Town and is information it clearly should have before making any decision. It changes the entire nature of the application. We also request, as we have previously, that the exact scope and nature of the existing and proposed elements of the project be fully disclosed in order to enable the Town to not only determine what it is being asked now, but to have benchmarks for fixture review and enforcement. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Abigail Wickham Cc: Kieran Corcoran, Asst. Town Attorney Douglas Feldman, SCDHS Ref. # C 10-06-0002 Mark Carrera,New York State Dept of Environmental Conservation Steven Resler, Chief, Regulatory Bureau,New York State Dept of State Board of Trustees V-,. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. New Suffolk Waterfront Committee New York State Department of Environmental ConservOLIan Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Am �S Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 - FAX:_(631)-.444-0360.-- - - Pi , i . t Website: www dec.state.ny.us= � i1 '.''j Denise M.Sheehan Commissioner MAY 2 5 2006 ;---;May 19, 2006 _ Patricia Moor l._..- a_..::�, 51020 Main Street Guard of Trustees Southold, NY 1195271 Re: Application 91-4738-01008/00008 & , MAY 2 4 2006 i 1 #1-4738-01008/00009 Matt-A Mar Marina, 650 First Street, New Suffolk Southold Town Ptznnin Board Dear Ms. Moore: ~� The Department of Environmental Conservation is in receipt of two recent submissions for proposals at your client's above referenced property and we have made the following determinations. First, our records indicate that there are two facilities known as Matt-A-Mar Marina. Discussions in this correspondence refer to the facility located at 650 First Street unless stated otherwise. Your client has a pending Tidal Wetlands application, #1-4738-01008/00008, for a permit to construct new boat storage structures, and to make drainage and parking area improvements. That application has remained incomplete since April 20, 2005. Recently(May 3, 2006)we received a request from you for a No-Jurisdiction determination to replace a septic system on the site. This jurisdictional request cited a 1991 No-Jurisdiction letter issued previously by this department. However, the No-Jurisdiction letter referenced was for another facility known as Matt-A-Mar Marina on Wickham Avenue. In addition, we have reviewed the historical aerial photographs your client submitted and they appear to show that no bulkhead existed southeast of your client's property. It appears that Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25)jurisdiction extends 300 feet from the tidal waters (tidal wetlands) onto your client's site. Because your client has not proven that Article 25 jurisdiction is limited on their site a permit is necessary for all upland improvements to the property. Therefore, this request to replace a septic system is being consolidated into the pending application, #1-4738-01008/00008,because both applications involve proposed upland improvements and segmentation of projects into smaller proposals is contrary to the intent of the regulations. As stated above this application has remained incomplete since April 2005. Your client must submit the following items in order to pursue this application. Page 2 of 3 #1-4738-01008/00008: 1) The application forms submitted state that Matt-A-Mar Marina ULC'islthe landowner and other documents indicate Love Lane Acquisition Corp. is the landowner. 'You must clarify ownership of the property and submit proof of ownership and a valid mailing address. 2) Your client must submit a site plan(5 copies) showing apparent high water, apparent low water, vegetated wetland areas should they exist, and all proposed upland work including the proposed boat storage structures, parking area improvements, drainage improvements and proposed septic system replacement. The site plan must depict any proposed filling, amounts of fill, source of fill, grading areas, excavation areas, materials to be used for parking areas and dimensions for all proposed strictures. The plans should clearly show which structures are. existing and which are proposed. 3) Your client must submit a cross sectional view showing the proposed new septic system a minimum of 2 feet above seasonal high groundwater(SHG) and SHG must be documented by providing test hole data. All proposed stormwater leaching rings must include this same information (see below). 4) The site plan must provide a lot coverage calculation comparing the total upland(non- wetland) area to the area proposed to be covered by new and existing impervious structures or surfaces. If the lot coverage exceeds the 20 % maximum allowed then your client must submit a variance request addressing the items listed in section 661.11. 5) The Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) state that any increase in surface water runoff to tidal wetlands must be prevented. If your client is proposing any paved or impervious parking areas then your client must demonstrate that all storm water from a 2.5" rain event will be contained on site by drainage structures. The project plans must include stormwater calculations showing the collection area, amount of stormwater to be collected, and capacities of proposed drainage structures. Be advised, this department will object to any proposed increase in stormwater runoff being discharged to marine waters. 6) This project is being reviewed pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Town of Southold has been designated as lead agency. A determination of significance for the purposes of SEQRA are necessary before the application can be considered complete. Be further advised, all new structures are required to be more than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary. If any structures are proposed less than 75 feet from the wetland boundary your client must submit a variance request addressing all the items listed in section 661.11. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Page 3 of 3 In addition to the above, on April 24, 2006 this department received an application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to replace existing bulkheads and walkways, construct a new walkway and backfill the bulkheads. This application, #1-4738-01008/00009, is being processed separate from the above application for upland improvements because it appears to be routine bulkhead replacement. However, we find this application to be incomplete for the following items. #1-4738-01008/00009: 1) Your client must submit a site plan (5 copies) that depicts the dimensions of all proposed bulkhead work (lengths, distances, widths), backfill areas, fill storage areas, the apparent high water line, apparent low water line and any vegetated wetland areas should they exist. The site plans must clearly show which structures shall remain unchanged and which existing structures are proposed to be replaced. The site plans must also show relevant distances from fixed structures to the proposed new bulkheads and the plans must clearly state whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures. 2) Your client must submit a cross section (5 copies) for each section of bulkhead work that is different. The cross sections must show apparent high water, apparent low water, backfill areas and walkways. The cross section must clearly indicate whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures, and the distance between new and existing bulkheads must be clearly shown. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Additional items may be requested subsequent to our inspection and technical review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at(631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Carrara Deputy Permit Administrator cc: Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC Town of Southold Interested Citizens file v S� MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ``*�F S�uTyOl Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` O OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR N Q54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �p (cor Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND PA Southold, NY ,� Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 9, 2006 r, o , Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. ` MAY1 2 2006 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Amended Site Plan of Matt-a Mar by the Bay Located at a/s/o First Street approximately 32'•s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone M-II Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 8, 2006: WHEREAS, This application for site plan approval proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the MII Zone located at a/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2005 the applicant's agent submitted a request that the determination of significance remain open; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board agreed to hold the determination of significance open to April 24th, 2006 and the date has passed with no new supplemental information submitted by the applicant agent; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and be it further RESOLVED, The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the report titled Environmental Assessment Review Environmental and Planning Considerations Matt-A -Mar By the Bay, LLC (c-D New Suffolk prepared by Nelson, Pope and Voorhis, LLC, and be it further Matt-a Mar by the Bay Page Two May 9, 2006 RESOLVED, that because the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action, and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article 617.8, scoping will be required for the action, and be it further RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration dated April 28, 2006 for your records. Additionally, as indicated above, scoping shall be required for the action. Please provide a draft scope for distribution to all involved agencies. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, edlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson enc. cc: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Steve Resler, New York Department of State Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC Tj TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency Town of Southold Planning Board Contact Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Address Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Date: April 28, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review — SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title of Action. Mat-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC @ New Suffolk SEQR Status. Unlisted Action Location. The site is located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 feet south of King Street in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, NY. The site is 3.25 acres in size(2.94 acres above mean high water) and is located within the Marine II(M-11)zoning district. SCTM No 1000-117-08-18 Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s.f., as well as the maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building. As stated above, the upland portion of the site totals 2.94 acres in size and the site is located in the Town of Southold's M-11 zoning district. 1 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC @ New Suffolk Site Plan Application,Southold As depicted on the Site Plan, all of the proposed boat racks will be located in the northern portion of the site and each will contain two (2) to three (3) parking spaces underneath. The existing 600 s.f. storage structure and garbage and recycling area in the center of the northern portion of the property will be removed. The storage racks will be configured in a circular pattern west of the existing restaurant and storage building,with traffic flow provided inside and along the perimeter of the racks. The boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, with each storage unit being approximately 30.5' wide and providing a 7' high automobile parking space underneath. Three levels of boat storage are provided in each rack. Additional parking areas will be provided adjacent to the existing restaurant and shop, with the remainder of the site parking proposed in the southern portion of the site. Four site access points are provided off of the easterly termination of Main Street, two along the north side and the remaining two along the south side. The southerly access points from Main Street will be gated. Although not specified, it appears as if the site perimeter and areas adjacent to the existing shop and restaurant will be vegetated. As part of the project, the lot surface will consist of a recycled concrete aggregate base and a total of thirty seven (37) 10' x 3' leaching basins are proposed (21 within the northern portion of the property and 16 within the southern portion). The drainage system has been designed to accommodate a 2" storm event. The Site Plan indicates that the location of the drainage system may vary based on the location of the existing septic system and location and condition of the existing subsurface drainage system. No additional capacity to the existing sanitary system is proposed and no additional site lighting is proposed. The Site Plan indicates that conditions are based on a survey prepared by Wallace T. Bryan (date unknown) and depicts the location and configuration of the marina basin. From this, it appears as if approximately 20 boat slips are currently maintained; however, the parking data provided on the Site Plan indicates 10 boat slips require parking. Additionally, review of a 2001 aerial photograph reveals a slightly different configuration of mooring piles. Based on parking calculations provided on the Site Plan, a total of 185 parking spaces are required by Town Code. Parking calculation data indicates that a total of 183 parking spaces plus 2 handicapped spaces will be provided; however, review of the Site Plan depicts a total of 183 spaces (including 2 handicapped spaces) are provided (it appears that the number of boat storage parking spaces is deficient by 2 spaces). Additionally, the parking calculation data indicates that 61 of the parking spaces are proposed to be land banked; however review of the Site Plan depicts only 26 of the parking spaces in the southern portion of the site will be constructed, leaving the remaining 80 spaces depicted as land banked parking. Reasons Supporting This Determination: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • the proposed site plan and boat storage rack elevations and brochure, • a Part I Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), • preparation of an Environmental Assessment Review, • preparation of a Part II Environmental Assessment Form, Page 2 of 5 r, Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC @ New Suffolk Site Plan Application,Southold • independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such that air quality, groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, or flooding, erosion, leaching or drainage problems may occur Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The proposed project is not expected to result in a negative impact to the vegetation or fauna found on site. However,proposed site landscaping and buffer areas should be reviewed so that impacts to adjacent properties and overall effect of the buffer areas can be assessed. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the sites location on Cutchogue Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as relates to water quality, harbor use, and scenic resources d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project has been evaluated in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning The project's consistency with the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. should also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The site is associated with historical marine uses and contained the first submarine manufacturing facility and has been utilized commercially since. Potential contamination of the Page 3 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC @ New Suffolk Site Plan Application,Southold site should be evaluated. The proposed boat storage racks are expected to result in negative impacts to aesthetic resources and daily operations may negatively effect community character f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in use of fuel operations as utilized by marina patrons. Impacts to local facilities should be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use ofpublic streets for site operations h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources,or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation use, water quality, noise and visual resources, community character, as well as health and safety impacts i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days,compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is not expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days, however, it is expected to attract a significant number of people to the area seasonally. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does not propose a significant physical site alteration; however, the intensity ofproposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant Page 4 of 5 Cj Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC @ New Suffolk Site Plan Application,Southold environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, NYSDEC NYSDEC, Regional Office at Stony Brook Town of Southold Supervisor's Office Town Clerk of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Secretary to the Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Involved Agencies Citizens for Safe Roads Parties of Interest Attorney for Applicant Applicant J Page 5 of 5 May 2, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairwoman_ And Members of the Planning Boal Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall iI P. O. Box 1179 ` .a 11 MAY — 2 2006 1:1 ' Southold, NY 11971 3 Re: Mattfla-Mar on the Bay 1117-�--18 Board of iru�tep.s SEQRA determination Dear Ms. Woodhouse: With regard to the projected decision of the Planning Board May 8, 2006, on the SEQRA determination for the Matt-a-Mar property in New Suffolk: there are many reasons for a positive declaration. However, in our view, the most compelling and determining reason is that we(New Suffolk and Southold Town) need to know, once and for all, the nature and degree of contamination on that property before another spade is turned for any purpose. After over 160 years of deposits of coal, oils, tar, kerosene, gasoline, copper, solvents– and who knows how many other elements and chemicals–the property is a repository of suspected contamination. Please issue a positive SEQRA declaration for a full environmental review. Thank you for your attention and your patience. Sincerely, g *'t—, Joan B. Robbins Newton Robbins 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Cc: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department ✓Southold Town Board of Trustees NYSDEC –Stony Brook Mark Terry, Southold Town Planning Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Am Building 40 -SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 - FAX: (631)444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us 14aw Denise M.Sheehan Commissioner April 21, 2006 Abigail Wickham Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C. PO Box 1424APR 2 5 2006 Mattituck, NY 11952 Tn Re: Application#1-4738-01008/00008 Matt-A-Mar By the Bay LLC Dear Ms. Wickham: This is in response to your letter dated April 18, 2006 requesting comments regarding mitigation measures to protect-groundwater and surface water, and expressing concern regarding the SEQRA review process. As you know, all agencies within New York State must comply with State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA). While SEQRA is part of the Environmental Conservation Law (EtL), the Department of Environmental Conservation is not responsible for enforcing SEQRA. If you believe that SEQRA has not been complied with you may file an Article 78 complaint against the lead agency. The SEQRA regulations, section 617.6(b)(3)(iii), state"The determination of significance issued by the lead agency following coordinated review is binding on all other involved agencies." In 'this case a SEQRA coordination was performed and the Southold Board of Trustees has been designated as lead agency. Therefore, this department must abide by the Town's SEQRA determinations in this matter. At this time we cannot respond to your inquiry regarding mitigation measures to protect groundwater and surface water because the project sponsor's application for permit has remained incomplete since April 20, 2005 (copy enclosed). We cannot comment appropriately with insufficient facts and information about the project. If the department receives all the requested information from the project sponsor, we will conduct an inspection and review of the proposal to determine if the project complies with the' Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661). Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Carrara Deputy Permit Administrator cc: Town of Southold, Board of Trustees Matt-A Mar By the Bay, LLC file i i New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 j Phone: (631)444-0365 • FAX: (631)444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us - Denise M.Sheehan NOTICE OF INCOMActing Commissioner PLETE APPLICATION April 20, 2005 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application#1-4738-01008/00008 Matt-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC, Property, 650 First Street, SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Ms. Moore: The Department of Environmental Conservation has preliminarily reviewed your client's application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to construct parking area and boat storage and install drainage structures and we find it deficient for the following items/information. , 1) Suffolk County Tax Records indicate that Love Lane Acquisition Corp. is the owner of the parcel. Please confirm that Matt-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC. is the new owner, not the contract vendee. If Matt-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC. is the contract vendee, please submit authorization from the current owner. 2)The applicant's telephone number. 3)Two copies of a signed, stamped survey. 4)The site plan (Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan) must show the correct name of the property owner-the site plan says Matt-A-Mar Marina Inc.,Love Lane Acquisition Corp and the application form says Matt-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC, Michael Raynor-which is correct?; the name of the facility must also be shown-is it Cove View Marina or something else?; dimensions of the proposed work areas, grade changes, excavation, filling, and clearing; existing and proposed , contours; the source, type and volume of material to be placed or removed; all existing structures must be shown (ie: existing boat storage and parking); all proposed structures must be labeled- are both the north and south parking areas proposed?; and show the dimensions and types of materials for all proposed structures. 5)The site plan (Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan) must also show the tidal wetland boundary; the line of apparent high water; the line of apparent low water; the percent adjacent area lot coverage data of existing and proposed structures; the size of all proposals; the nature of the surface of the existing and proposed parking areas; the test hole location, date and time; and the test hole data, including distance to groundwater; existing drywells to be removed must be labeled as such; the existing wood retaining wall to be removed must be labeled as such; the proposed boat storage building and office must be shown; the proposed sanitary system must be shown. 6) The Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations [6NYCRR Part 661.6(a)(1)] require structures to be located a minimum of 75 feet from any tidal wetlands. If your client's parking areas are proposed less than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary, your client's proposal will require a variance from the development restrictions of section 661.6. Additionally, the regulations allow no more than 20% of the upland area of a lot to be covered with new and existing structures (including all impervious surfaces). If your client proposes to cover more than 20% of the lot with existing and new structures, the maximum permissible lot coverage would be exceeded. In that instance, your client's proposal would require a variance from the development restrictions of Part 661.6. _ Part 661.12 (a) states "The burden of showing that a variance to such provisions should be granted shall rest entirely on the applicant". The following items must be addressed and/or submitted in order to complete an application for a variance: A written request specifying, which element(s) of the development restrictions relief is sought from, the minimum relief that is necessary, the practical difficulties claimed, a discussion of alternate site possibilities, a discussion of change of project objective possibilities and a discussion of environmental impact reduction and/or mitigation measures to be employed. A plan (5 copies) showing the minimum variance necessary and all mitigation and impact reduction measures. 7) Tidal Wetlands Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) state that any increase in surface water runoff to tidal waters must be prevented from directly running into any such waters by the utilization of sufficient runoff control measures (i.e. retention basins, detention basins, leaching pools...). Any proposed storm water runoff drainage structures must be designed and constructed to recharge, leach, or retain the storm water runoff produced on the project site by a five-year storm. You must submit existing and proposed drainage calculations that show the amount of runoff to tidal waters will not increase due to the proposed project. 8)A crossview of the proposed sanitary system including the structural component dimensions. 9) The project is being reviewed pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). A designation of lead agency and a determination of significance for the purposes of SEQR are necessary before your application can be considered complete. Enclosed is an application checklist for your assistance. I This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are submitted and or addressed adequately. Please do not hesitate to call me at (631)444-0351 if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, 4�z� ACW" Naomi Handell Environmental Analyst Enclosure cc: Matt-A-Mar by the Bay,LLC file Jan 11, 2006 Field Inspection , o s ' r r Dec.14, 2005 Field Inspection Y i t�' _ II / 6 21. Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of ARNOLD BARTON requests a Wetland Permit to repair inkind/inplace approx. 124 linear ft. of existing bulkhead. Located: 5295 Nassau Point Rd., Cutchogue. SCTM#111-9-13 22. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of MARY DIGREGORIO requests a Wetland Permit tom s� construct a 4'X 58' fixed timber dock, a 3'X 16' ramp, and 6'X 20' floating dock. Located: 100 Oak St., Cutchogue. SCTM#136-1-36 atricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of GEORGE KOFINAS requests a Wetland Permit toctd,l "°'� +�o renovate the existing residence, construct a second-floor addition, install an in-ground ,c� swims pool nd pavilion. Located: 552 East R ., Cutchogue. SCTM#110-7-18.1 24. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of NORMAN & JUDITH SHAPP requests a Wet and Permit for the existing docking facility, consisting of a 3'X 30' timber dock, 3'X 12' ramp, an 16' floating dock. Located: 485 Orchard Lane, Southold. SCTM#89-2-7 25. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC requests a S Wetland Permit to construct boat racks and a parking area. Located: 650 First St., New Suffolk.-SCTM#117-8-18 - ___._____ 26. Suffolk environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of MONICA KREISCHER requests a _i Wetland Permit to replace/reconstruct the existing timber bulkhead located within theme. northern section of subject property with a vinyl sheathed bulkhead. Located: 825 ,E Harbor Lights Dr., Southold. SCTM#71-2-16 27. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of SIM MOY requests a Wetland_Permit 'I to construct a single-family d ched rear deck, pervious driveway, retaining wall and sanitary oca d., Southo CTM#90-2- F'C�: 28. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of MICHAEL ZEVITS requests a X11 i Wetland Permit to construct a single-family dwelling, attached rear porch/deck, fence;/ driveway, and sanitary system. Located: 1450 West Southold. M#88-6-18 5 29. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of ENZO MORABITO requests af�yc_i_ j Wetland Permit to construct a single-family dwelling, attached rear deck, pervious iP 1 driveway, sanitary system and private well. Locate 895 Glen Court, Cutchgoue.�l r SCTM#83-1-9 VIII. RESOLUTIONS–OTHER: 1. Proper-T Permit Services on behalf of GREGORY MAZZANOBILE requests an Amendment to Permit#5631 to eliminate the swimming pool and move the proposed sanitary system leaching pools 3' further from the wetlands line. Located: 1300 & 1460 Lake Dr., Southold. SCTM#59-1-21.6&21.7 _-2. Appoint Frank Thorp III as a member of the Shellfish Advisory Committee, for a term of one year, term to expire on December 31, 2005. AVN L 6 n` of a-,-A, rc,, s A Q�c f June 15, 2005 Field Inspection -- 9�. »»»»»> »»»»> > Enjoy, >>>>>>>>>> Heather >>>>>>>>>>> <crn_tlt.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> clear.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <crn_trt.gif> »»»»»> < ear.gif> »»»»»> <c ear.gif> »»»»»>, <cl ar.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> Clic on a photo belo to view the entire photo album! >>>>>>>>>>> <cle r.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <clea .gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <clea .gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <clear gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <clear. if> >>>>>>>>>>> <clear. if> »»»»»> <O.gif> »»»»»> <l.gif> »»»»»> <2.gif> »»»»»> <3.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <375233121 FGbR_th.jpg> »»»»»> <4.gif> »»»»»> <5.gif> »»»»»> <6.gif> »»»»»> <7.gif> »»»»»> esme >>>>>>>>>>> <clear.gif> >>>>>>>>>>> <clea .gif> »»»»»> <cle gif> »»»»»> >>>>>>>>>>> Do ou have the F EE Webshots Desktop? Add these photos to »»»»»> yo >>>>>>>>>>> sc eensaver & wall per! If you dont have it yet, you can »»»»»> do load >>>>>>>>>>> t e FREE Webshots De ktop here! >>>>>>>>>>> < romo_288xl54.gif> »»»»»> »»»»»> »»»»»> »»»»»> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> »»»»> »»»»> »»»»> »»»» > »»»» > »»»»t> >>>>>>>>>> »»»»> »»»»> »»»»> »»»»> -- »»»»> \ »»»»> »»»»> »»»»> C � � I �, �'� s C ;� � ,der Albert J. Krupski,President �*OF SOUjjyO Town Hall James King,Vice-President 01 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson G p .�` Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 1, 2005 Michael Raynor P.O. Box 952 Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY,LLC. SCTM# 117-8-18 650 MAIN STREET, NEW SUFFOLK Dear Mr. Raynor: At a recent inspection of the above referenced property by the Planning Office and the Trustee Office in regards to your application before both Boards, there was found to be materials placed behind the bulkheads that are not permitted. There is various garbage, as well as C&D construction debris and asphalt. These materials are not allowed within 100' of surface waters. I spoke with a worker on site and explained that these materials were not to be used as backfill for the bulkhead, and must be removed to an approved upland disposal site. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Heather Tetrault Environmental Technician Gail O. Tiska PO Box 307 New Suffolk, NY 11956 July 6, 2005 Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Southold Town Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear MtX I am writing to express my objection to the proposed development plan submitted by Matt-a-Mar by the Bay on the waterfront in New Suffolk. The character of this tiny hamlet cannot possibly be enhanced by a project of this magnitude. I know you have all the particulars and the data at your disposal. I trust that you will adhere to the letter of the law as well as the consideration of this community and its residents and existing businesses. Sincerely, D Gail O. Tiska 4111: - 7 20 , southotd Town Board of Trustees Com.. rt;,. °v.,.a..... . , ... ... .. ....{�..�.r..�... ..�...�,;,. .... .'�. Gy... ..�y.cic; :Y. . .. ..:�+c� ....�,, � NOTICE Police Dept. - Bay"Constable Town of Southold Peconic, New York 11958 NOTICE,OF VIOLATION tk' Date: S r� (Owner or authorized agent of owner) Address: -(Address of owner or authorized agent of owner) -Please take notice there exists a violation of the Code of the Town of Southold, Chapter 97 ��lk tieaol Article II, Section 97-20 a premises hereinafter described in that —t't c.. J 7Ae +)Q rc.,..j 4-- "`i ri�y s-►L.,se's o F F, You are therefore directed and ordered to comply with the following: Co o-+,-, -T a -TO k w -i-n P�'oc' P 41 on or before the 3 4r— day of , 20 r The premises to which this Notice of Violation refers are situated at: s, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY (Suffolk County Tax Map Designation: Dist. 1000 Section: 1! Block: Lot:. ► ) Failure to comply with the applicable provisions of the law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. NOTICE:You have the right to apply for a hearing before the Board of Trustees r, of the Town of Southold, provided that you file a written request with the Clerk,of the Trustees within 10 days after service of the Notice of Violation. Such request shall have annexed thereto a copy of the Notice of Violation upon which a Hearing is requested and shall set forth the reasons,why such notice of viola- tion should be modified or rescinded. Bay Constab ;-Towh"of Southold,.,NY h .. - Y DECEE W � r p i July 1, 2005 JUL 5 2005 ` Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Southold Town Planning Board Board of Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay SCTM#1000-17-8-18 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Thank you for your letters acknowledging mine regarding Matt-a-Mar by the Bay. Please see the, enclosed copies of photographs I took at Strong's Marina this Spring. They give a good representation of how the proposed boat racks would not only obscure, but obliterate, the scenic view vistas of the waterfront cherished by New Suffolk residents and many others in Southold Town and beyond. There is no way the boat racks proposed by Matt-a-Mar by the Bay would "enhance visual quality'and protect scenic resources,"as Policy 3 of the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form requires. On the contrary. The application cannot be consistent with the LWRP on this point alone. There are many other concerns. Is the applicant's property 3.25 acres or 3.5 acres? On which number are taxes paid? What is the difference? If it's underwater ownership, has that issue been resolved? The restaurant has not been in operation since November 2002. At what point in time°is this' usage disallowed, litigation notwithstanding?-If it is allowed, what are the proposed"final" numbers foil seating, boat slips, and parking spaces.' Is any enlargement part of applicant's plan for the future? I ` With regard to parking, applicant appears to regard the Town parking lot for the ramp as available for any public parking. In reality, the space is occupied during boating hours(early to late)by vehicles with the trailers used to launch the boats. What is the provision for supply and/or storage of fuel for the boats as they are put into the- water? Are they to be returned to the racks with tanks at least partially full? Are the bilges to be pumped out, if so, into what? Most importantly, has the upland soil been sampled and tested? Nothing should be allowed to further disturb the soil before there is a definitive evaluation of the 160 years of contamination. There must be a positive declaration on SEQRA. The entire property is the heart of this hamlet. Its revitalization must be small in scale, in keeping with the present character of the hamlet, as stated-forthrightly in the New Suffolk Hamlet Study. As the LWRP states: "the high degree of environmental sensitivity, not io mention the unique historic c'haiacter of the New Suffolk area, in general, highlights the need for`,carefid and limited development." a —2— It is hoped that an alternative plan to the one proposed by Matt-a-Mar by the Bay will be presented to the Town-- one that is acceptable to New Suffolk residents, consistent with the LWRP and the Hamlet Study, and achievable, with the help of the Town. Sincerely, Joan Robbins 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk,NY 11956 Cc: Joshua Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Assessors Southold Town Building Department V96-uthold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC - Stony Brook �6- �r PSLI __.. V*A M I * kta Field Inspection M rn�ti 3',2�S f ,� 't aw t4. ik.12 Field Inspection i ! J'.T; ,�,;•'�•,, �° ._t.,,�. ,,err "� ��tY �1ttii r� �oi� • ,, . . • : .k :,. �t���� 11:4 S " 32 3:1 Ja �� J 7. Garden fencing has been placed in the intertidal area along the creek,presumably as a barrier to Canadian Geese. This is in violation of Chapter 97, the Town Wetland Code. Please remove all fencing. 8. There is a rowboat upside down on the marsh in the intertidal area. This is also in violation of Chapter 97. Please remove the boat and store it in the upland part of your property. 9. There are wood chips in the non-disturbance buffer area on the eastern side of your property. A non disturbance buffer is defined in Chapter 97 as follows: "An area, typically fifty (50)feet wide, immediately landward of the wetland boundary, shoreline structure, or other line designated by the Trustees where no operations, maintenance or other activities can take place." The non-disturbance buffer is an area designated to remain in its natural state, in order to provide a buffer area to the creek,provide habitat, and for flood control. Please remove the wood chips in the Phragmites. Please contact this office to discuss the requirements for conforming to your permit and the regulations of the Town. The Trustees will send a representative to meet you at the above referenced property to clarify the items in this letter. We expect to hear from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter. Very Truly Yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/hct Tetrault, Heather From: Tetrault, Heather Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:06 AM To: Dzenkowski, Don; Kruszeski, Frank; Scopaz, Valerie; Epple, Andy Subject: New Suffolk- Matt-a-Mar by the bay On a recent site visit concerning a pending application at this site the Planning office saw that there wasigarbage, asphalt, and construction debris placed landward of the bulkhead as fill for holes and erosion areas. I also visited the site and the Trustees would like the asphalt, C&D material, and garbage removed to.;a suitable upland disposal area. The use of these materials next to the water and behind the bulkhead is not allowed. Only clean fill-is permitted for backfilling bulkheads. Please issue a violation. Thank you Heather 1 i/api.v RQ�' Heather, Ma4-q ,fnae May 16, 2005 Here are a few notes I took at the Buil4ing Meeting. Po Trustees concerns 1) plans for the restaurant&septic 2) plans for the shed 3) future use of area 4) possibility of switching parking and racks 5)drainage 6)pump out facility t+ Our jurisdiction is limited to only one of the racks on the north side 46 There may be a need for 1 or 2 variances A.- There is some question of ownership, land owned under the pier, how much land, 3 or areas. r.* There needs to be proof of keeping it open -0 DEC prefers dry rack storage?Chuck H.said so? A.• Val asked if Trustees would ask for some landscaping,AI said trustees don't usually ask M2 for It 4- Existing wet slips(10)will remain as is, no plans for change ro 'Roof and Rack'(on-line) contains relevant data ri No plans to offer fuel pumps;this became a big question. Ken says that if 50' boats can't get their fuel here,they will scour the creeks to get fuel at other more inland marinas in Cutchogue 4- AI said the trustees will need the project staked in the field (also the height)and we should go look at it again in June 2) °i Topographical maps will becoming 46 Parking for Legends will be moved to both sides of the dead end road 4e Building Dept.will be lead agency 4# Mark said New 5uffolk has been defined as a Hamlet e` Height of the restaurant is 30', boat rakes will be 35' P• One Bld Dpt member said;the racks are better on the N side because if they were on the 5 side they would interfere with the vistas! Val disagreed and said they would interfere on either side! fo Gail Wickham had quite a few questions;1) is the land already fill and will this have an affect on drainage 2) boat maintenance may still get done"under canvas"and needs to be kept an eye on 3)this is very windy area and the trustee need to be concerned about the wind surfers and sailors(?)4)what about the existing 2 buildings on the water-will they need repairs, have they already had repairs or upgrades without permits,who were the repairs made for, does new septic need to be conslderedl Ai Val suggested the trustees co-lead on this project('The Town never wants to pre-empt the trustees jurisdiction.') A..- 30' boats will be the max on the racks 4- Pete H. had a concern about the longterm boat storage(those boats that remain on the racks all year for one reason or another) 'r It was then suggested that the applicant indicate on the plans were this"long term'storage would be 4- Mr. 5imon5 asked if they would need a height variance since with a boat on top the height would exceed the towns Max. Pe Pat M. said they are meeting the height requirement! As of now... SEQUA review 15 the next step MEMO April 25, 2005 To: Planning Board Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay SCTM# 117-8-18 This is a partial list of Trustee concerns regarding the Matt-a-Mar application for boat racks: 1. Location of the racks seems to be dangerous as far as the movement across the street with the movement of boats for launching. Location may be better in the southern part of the marina. 2. Height: what will that height look like; how does it compare for the rest of New Suffolk, and how does it affect view vistas. 3. Sanitary facilities: new ones or using the existing at the restaurant? These have had problems for years. 4. Pump out facilities for boats. 5. Hours of operation(boat launch will be loud). 6. Traffic for the boat rack use, and travel lift traveling on the roads. 7. Impact on the bay of that number of boats. 8. Contamination of existing land from previous uses. 9. Impact on the fueling facilities at New Suffolk Shipyard and Schoolhouse Creek. 10. Conformance with the Hamlet study. 11. Waste generation on site; 12. Scale of operation 13. Number of slips. 14. Buffer areas./Evergreen screening 15. Water quality impacts. 16. Extra policing needed for 153 additional moterboats in that part of the bay, and beyond. 17. Any additional on site facilities and use of current ones. 18. Although this is a marine zoned area,what of the density of this project/number of boats/staging of these boats in and out of the bay/bilge pumps dumping into the bay. 19. Drainage on site. 20. Parking. 21. What is allowed in other Towns? 22. Any maintenance done on boats while in the yard; i.e. use of bottom paint, strippers, scrapers,winterizing engines, antifreeze, etc. 23. Pollution: require only 4 cycle engines as many areas are now doing �. Zcre y> •23 o P 'FY5 A local law to amend Article XXV, Site Plan Approval by adding a new,§ 100-260, entitled Standards for Uses in the Marine I( icle XI), Marine II (Article II) and Resort Residential (Article VI) Districts Section 1. Declaration of Purpose. Southold has more thanl60 miles of waterfront property. Southold enjoys a rich history and tradition of maritime activity, both for recreation and as a source of livelihood. Waterfront property in the Town of Southold is in great demand but limited supply. The value of property in general has grown rapidly in recent years; waterfront property has led all other types of property in this rapid growth. Southold contains three separate areas which areas which are currently zoned for marine business use: The Marine I (MI) District, located within the town's creeks or natural coves; Marine II (MII) District, located on major waterways, open bayfronts and Long Island Sound; and Residential Resort (RR) District. The predominant nature of the properties in these districts is that of marinas and boat yards. The Town Board realizes that in a waterfront community such as the Town of Southold, it is appropriate and necessary to assure that land-based facilities necessary for support of the maritime community, both recreational and occupational, be available and that the owners of such facilities be able to derive a reasonable return on their investment. However, through the adoption of site plan review standards for uses in the MI and MII Districts, the Board hopes to balance the competing interests of the marine business community with-the surrounding residents and businesses, especially with respect to the location and height of structures, access, lighting, landscaping, vistas, noise,parking, traffic, fumes and fire safety. By adopting this law, the Board hopes and believes that the competing interest mentioned above will be able to co-exist in harmony and for the overall improvement of life in the Town of Southold. Section 2. Chapter 100 of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended by adopting a new Section 160 entitled Standards for Certain Uses in the Marine I(Article XI), Marine II (Article H) and Resort Residential (Article VI) Districts, to read as follows: Section 160. Standards for Certain Uses in the Marine I (MI), Marine II (MII) and Resort Residential (RR) Districts In addition to its authority to review site plan applications based on the objectives in § 100-252 and the elements of§100-257, the Planning Board is directed to use the following standards in acting on site plan applications for uses in the M I, M II and RR zoning districts': A. Guidelines specifically related to marinas, beach clubs, yacht clubs and boat clubs: ' except one-family detached dwellings per single and separate lot of record. 1. Structures which do not require a waterfront location shall be sited inland from the waterfront as much as possible to increase open space along the waterfront, to minimize exposure to flooding and reduce the impacts of runoff and non-point source water pollution 2. The design of marinas,beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs shall minimize the need to dredge. In addition, dredging and dredge spoil disposal shall not be permitted if it would adversely impact surface or groundwater quality, aquatic and upland habitats, historic or archeological resources, visual quality, or navigation in adjacent areas. When excavation is necessary, excavated material should be contained to avoid entering adjacent water bodies. 3. Basin design for marinas, beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs shall promote maximum flushing and exchange of waters to minimize accumulation of contaminants and sediments. 4. Upland portions of marinas, beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs shall be designed to control and wherever possible, reduce storm water runoff so as to prevent the contamination of the marina basin. If maintenance or repair work will be conducted onsite, work areas must be enclosed and have impervious surfaces for hull maintenance, source controls (e.g., sander vacuums), proper on-site storage and disposal facilities for waste fuel and used oil, spent solvents and antifreeze and signage directing users to the disposal areas. 5. All designs for marinas, beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs shall demonstrate the existence of an adequate water supply to serve the facility's needs. All designs must be designed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer. 6. Outdoor storage of boats, equipment, or similar uses shall be screened using evergreen plantings, berms, fences, or a combination thereof. 7. Any proposed new marina,beach club, yacht club or boat club or any existing marina, beach club, yacht club or boat club proposing to expand or increase docking facilities or services shall be required to: (A) Install marine sanitation pumpout devices at a minimum rate of one pump-out station for every 100 wet slips or fraction thereof. (B) Install a potable water supply with proper backflow prevention. (C) Provide for sanitary rest rooms on site and for the collection and proper disposal of domestic sewage, solid waste (garbage, trash, etc.), grease, oil and gasoline in accordance with federal and state law, as well as the regulations of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and this Code. (D) Provide for the drainage, treatment and disposal in an approved manner of upland stormwater within the marina complex. (E) Provide for adequate parking on-site and use of swales and pervious materials around parking areas to contain runoff and facilitate percolation and filtering. 8. Any marina, beach club, yacht club or boat club permitted to dispense gasoline, diesel fuel, mixed fuels, engine oils and similar supplies shall locate fueling stations and storage areas where spills can be contained in a limited area; shall have spill contingency plans in-place for storage and fueling dispensation areas; and shall maintain sufficient material for the collection and absorption of spilled petroleum products. 9. Outdoor lighting shall be contained on site, and no dock lighting may be more than 10 feet above the ground or dock level underneath it. These provisions shall not apply to navigational aids approved by the Coast Guard and the Town. 10. Public address or speaker systems shall be designed so as to project little or no noise across the property lines of the facility onto neighboring residential properties. 11. Dock capacity, design and configuration shall be subject to the review and approval of the Southold Trustees. B. Guidelines specifically related to boat and marine engine and repair facilities, boatyards and boat docks: 1. Dismantled boat, engines, all parts or supplies, goods, materials, refuse, garbage or debris shall be compatibly screened from view from the road and from the water. 2. Boat maintenance activities, including washing, sanding, painting, draining bilge water, and servicing motors, shall not discharge waste water or other substances into any water body, nor shall any waste materials be disposed of in such a manner that they run overground and into a water body. The applicant shall demonstrate that waste water and boat/engine maintenance residues will be contained and handled to prevent pollution of coastal waters. Best management practices shall be followed including contained impervious surfaces for hull maintenance; enclosed work areas to reduce residuals (e.g., sanding residue, solvents, oils); source controls (e.g., sander vacuums); use of swales around parking areas to contain runoff and facilitate percolation and filtering; use of pervious materials in the upland; prohibiting disposal of fish waste; proper on-site storage and disposal techniques for waste fuel and used oil, spent solvents and antifreeze and signage directing users to the disposal areas. 3. Outdoor storage of boats, equipment, or similar uses shall be screened using evergreen plantings, berms, fences, or a combination thereof. 4. Commercial excursion and charter fishing facilities shall make adequate provision for fish cleaning stations and entrails disposal. 5. Outdoor lighting shall be contained on site, and no dock lighting may be more than 10 feet above the ground or dock level underneath it. These provisions shall not apply to navigational aids approved by the Coast Guard and the Town. 6. Dock capacity, design and configuration shall be subject to the review and approval of the Southold Trustees. C. Guidelines specifically related to dry rack storage marinas and dry rack storage which is accessory to any use allowed in the MI, MII and RR Districts: 1. No boat storage rack or boat storage rack building shall be used for dry dock storage purposes unless it is located at least twenty(20') feet inside all property lines and thirty (30') feet from all paved roadways and bulkheads. 2. No dry dock storage marina shall be operated unless equipment owned or leased by the operator of such marina is available on site which is capable of removing all boats from the rack within a reasonable period of time in case of emergencies. 3. No dry dock storage marina shall be operated on property which is adjacent to premises zoned or used for residential or other non-commercial purposes unless a planted buffer zone has been established along the property line adjacent to such premises. Said planted buffer zone shall be at least ten (10') feet in depth. 4. Dry rack storage of boats shall be screened from view and from public right-of-ways and from the water with appropriate vegetation. kq � c � .n 7 is , g �`� p ,fps Fo i ,iar�, 1 ` n ��4 I G xvv al" 1 5 l JVAlq y 1, � �� �• �� m,.^"4 t,�m fiar;�3dP�'�� a�,,.r"". �`���J� r�s+M'��a��t�r�S �y����" 4s3 s *�,�' 71 3 4 s � ;, v t; i1 . f„ WWI son 14 U .. �s RAI fi Y UP ..; kr - �T�=�i,!"fid` d�1" �.. �•�£� t r l;c b � jp ?yam► g �'X fit} . h� d a6s��7 s �9 �y t �.r R ASA tz a Pr a +�:: K s.� 2 �* _•.gym VIC a :ga g SVC jC }+ R v yds v THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT COMMITTEE PO BOX 336,NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 May 1, 2006 MAY - 1 2006 Ms Jerilyn Woodhouse I, Chairwoman, Southold Town Planning Board m. - --- - k PO Box 1 179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Ms Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, In light of the upcoming SEQRA decision which the Planning Board will make regarding Mat-A- Mar By the Bay LLC's application#4738-01008/00008, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee would like to reiterate its concerns regarding this project and emphasize that a full environmental review is not only what many New Suffolk residents desire, but what they believe is mandated by the scope and scale of the Mat-A-Mar proposal. Clearly,the failure to date on the part of the applicant to provide a response to the July 2005 NP&V report, indicates that the points raised by NP&V are not only difficult to address, but we would suggest impossible to respond to adequately without a more comprehensive environmental study. A positive SEQRA Declaration from the Planning Board at this time would insure that the questions raised by the NP&V nearly one year ago, can finally be addressed. The Southold Town Hamlet Study describes New Suffolk as"Southold's only waterfront hamlet center"with a`_`unique and historic association with the Peconic Bay". The LWRP has identified the property as one of Southold's underutilized sites and has recommended redevelopment which"seeks to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront, but at a scale appropriate to the community."They go on to say, "The high degree of environmental sensitivity not to mention the unique historic character of the New Suffolk area, in generalhighlights the need for careful and limited redevelopment." There is also, as you know from the site's long history of proposed and then abandoned redevelopment projects, a question of possible contamination on the site,which has still to be resolved. It is clearly referred to in the LWRP where references are made to the "use of Brownfield Grants to pay for environmental clean up of the site prior to redevelopment."Again, a positive SEQRA declaration at this point,would help make the determination regarding the possible need and scope of environmental clean up before Mat-A-Mar moves forward with redevelopment of the property. �s As you complete your review of this application over the next few weeks,we ask you to consider the points we have made above and especially,to consider that this is one of the first opportunities for Southold to take advantage of the LWRP's power as a legislative tool. The LWRP was designed to protect the natural beauty, environment, and way of life of Southold waterfront communities. The way in which its recommendations are considered with regard to the Mat-A-Mar application,which is in fact an early test case, will affect other communities for years to come. Respectfully Yours Diana Schwatka, President, on behalf of the Committee Cc: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Members of the Board of Trustees Patricia Finnegan,Town Attorney Mark Carrera,NYS DEC Region 1 Deputy Permit Administrator Steven Resler,Coastal Resources Division,NYS Dept of State Steven Ridler,Coastal Resources Division,NYS Dept of State i .i r 'l �O COQ c TELEPHONE (516)765-1801 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 10, 1983 Mr. Roy L. Haje, President En-Consultants, Inc. 64 North Main Street Southampton, New York 11968 Re: Bulkhead repair/replacement at North Fork Shipyard (Marine Associates) New Suffolk Dear Roy: In reference to your letter of May 19, 1983, requesting a determination as to whether a permit is needed from the Southold Town Trustees for this project, the Trustees do not have jurisdiction; therefore no permit is needed from this board. Very truly yours, Board of Town Trustees Paul Stoutenburgh President PS/ip f ` E N V IRON,-AfNTAL _ " RV.ICLS r 57a3/p EN-CONSULTANTS, INC. 64 NORTH MAIN STREET, SOUTHAMPTON, NEW YORK 11468 516-283-6360 May 19, 1983 Town Clerk Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Bulkhead repair/replacement at North Fork Shipyard (Marine Associates) New Suffolk Dear Madam: Enclosed please find work plan for the proposed repair/replacerient of existing bulkheading at the site referenced above. Would you please determine if a Wetlands Permit is required for the project. No marsh grasses grow in this vicinity. By copy of this letter, I am requesting a similar determination from the Town Trustees on a permit from that body. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Roy L. Aaje enc 1 CC:Town Trustees A. Kenniff a" s 4 14 n, q w 4. fA n 0 gd � OEA VIM* 0 s /o � n Lochs C,a it/o IQ' ' T e4• T I $v FFocK �o. P,UMG RAc.sTRo� HAPa� X-SE[T, 'TMRv -rrflcAt- S<AtE G&PQKNeA0 RA SPLA C46tl NT oR Re PAIR - pv ^I A A I Iv.4 A. SAL c oR/A 's-r h V1 •� 'y k j!� 10 Q ,\ .� C . o O So /00 � � O c N _ t PROPOSED ONAWRAO, � Ae�K t` PIKE REvA►R/ V or RE Pl-A cFHENT "JA RIME AS SeciAres Su FPoLK Co., A %OT Q o �N Goy, IA/C h N ��� �• ael:;[is _Y� ;,,� ` or`+4S..i9P::ae.#..r.•T-�.w. wi--T.'T.:nV`... Town Hall, 53095 Main Road s .4;F P.O. Box 72$ Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T TERRY TELEPHONE TOWN CLERK (516)765-1801 REGISTRAR OP VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 23, 1983 Mr. Roy L.. Haje, President --� Enconsultants, Inc. 64 North Main Street Southampton, New York 11968 Dear Roy: An inspection has been made on behalf of. the Southold Town Board. with regard to the bulkhead repair/replacement at North Fork Shipyard (Marine Associates), N.ew Suffolk, and it has been determined a permit is not .required under Chapter 97 (Wetlands) of the Code of the Town of Southold. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk cc: Town Trustees .�-!">r �Yf"'�'� °�' a'�j'.�'�^ ��g3'+�+Y� � r, =?,y +fly' •� '4, � �� �' `tet`%� b�`sA'�f' .� Z .` .r. � � �• t 27 Board Of Southold Town Trustees � � q, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK i PERMIT NO. . lt�...W.4'1* DATE: -0—A I 1f ISSUED TO r Aut4arizattan Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of , the State of New York, 1693; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the `« State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS r w. IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the K REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the $�.. Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on .1�-"I7"�!a- 19 and in consideration of the sum of paid 6y �:• al ... Of ............ N. Y. andsubject to the !� �. Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, s of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: sc�c��-Y GC�T�y ti r ' all in accordance wit the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here= >. by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to _ be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date, f. Ln ...... .. ..... ... ...... ...... .................................... . ......... .... .... ...... Trustees ' ,9.`+ .. `"'.�'r'�!.�..sCd'5�.�.�."'+.:N��,-.'�,��Ti�.F1'�ss�•c ^G`f..�..�N =��,r,dr-�'1.:r-• � +rr ��=a" •+ . '�.0••e� Y _. '+i,'�-t j'`"2 �. 'j�,�a�r'` ir;ye' 'k2,¢;:r; ' . /' YiT`-` �y,•�i C' � y` ,lT.. �,,yy•V,•�� l•tr3v ~;+;: 'IRS !'��- I TRUSTEES �� �0 SUPERVISOR John M.Bredemeyer, III, President �a'� SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr.,Vice President o Henry P Smith b. ' .� Zbwn Hall John B. lVthill �,�,� 53095 Main Road William G Albertson 'raj �`�� P.O. Box 1179 . TI-ephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD :February 1, 1993 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Marina Bay Club SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr. Rayner: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees -at their regular meeting of January 28, 1993: • RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of .Trustees DENY without prejudice the request to amend the storm damage permit to replace docks with floating docks using existing piles instead of fixed docks The storm damage permit is for fixed docks and if you wish to amend this a full permit application is, necessary. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Ve truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB/j and TRUSTEES John U Drederneyer,III,President SUPERVISOR Henry P.Smith,Vice President W SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J.Ktupsld,Jr. John L Bednoski,Jr. Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(5 16)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTER LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION OffRTe- Use onl#.- Coastal Erosion Permit Application —Wetland Permit Application —Trustee Lands Permit Application Grandfather FEB 3 1993 Completed Apps. Date: —Variance. Required., Neighbors notified Date: UT'O! SEQRA Type TOWN 07F SOUTHOLD Coord. Review-opt. ,mand. Date Rec. by Office Insp. comp./date: _.2EQRA Determia./date: —Public Hearing/date: Findings: Permit Vote: (Y/N) : Special Conditions: (also see file) Application Fee: Application Number; SCTM #1000- Project Name (if any) Date Prepared: 93 Applicant: 'M fn k. C, Address: 320 LOY(,- L-Ar4c- rn L-4 r'A Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc. ) Owner of Property: SHAMago P-4c Address 3 S . Phone Subject Property Location: T F- -4L & (Provide LILC5-�Pole #, Distance to cross streets if Do' t on location map) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT v Yds. to be excavated: 11/ Yds. to be filled: lry 7�` Manner in which material w' 11 be removed or deposited: Width of canal, Gree} or bay fronting property: Depth at low tidez ..7' Aver. ise in tide: 2 z Distance to nearest• channel: Dist nee project extends beyond similar projects in area: A/ Area zoning: Land area in acres: �I+ Is project for private or business use: T,;,'tASrN 9AC Intended use of property: Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: Has any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: N Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: NO Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamation of land disturbed during construction of the principle and. accessory structures and underground structures. (i.e. , pipeline and septic system; make additional attachments if necessary) . Rg,&1Aii_.-b �'1 .ACCP C-�oY 5Yog bFlmt� . � � mag 0 Sci Lf- :CNSTAL-L �N oN .ST,NCt II.oCK !S;r 'uSrNC.iEv(s r,LNCr P .lv ��.._ 614 LR. szI is Le LF_Ss C_ 6 Authorization (Where the applicant is r) . I residing at (Print-owner of subject property) (Mailing address-phone) do hereby authorize to apply for Coastal Erosion permits) from the Southold Town Trustees Sc-e_ O •tr'&'ttti(D �-6�5_ Signature THIS IS NOT A PERMIT f o -S OLD THUAMOh, E�vi TH, Sl �EAW No. —�17. Sf• fS� Address��a�..S� Ats.� Scs�'�e1K THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE TOWN OF SOU'FHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 91971 TEL.: 765.1892 ) I r - rw 1 I ff( t1` 1 - lei WG 5T RIF-E T 111 I I r . 1 I 7 %�^ �. ._�,. .ea F�F r.... .yv_i' •• ... =R .. r .r,.� /�(.U7� l i c� P. 0. Drawer A .s Jamesport, NY 11947 = July 9, 1990 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman - � z Southold Town Planning: Board „T1 Main Road T( :OFSOUTHOLD S.o,thold:,. NY 11971 'RE: Maiina. Bay Club Site Plan Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pizrsuapt: to your letter of April 30, 1990, we hereby submit the following: data: After several meetings with Mr. Robert Jewell of the Suffolk County .Department of .Health .Services, we .have developed a "RO" system_ as one alternative to the ira•ter consumption needs of this project. This will meet Suffolk County be.partment of Health Service stand,ard�s in both• .design and capacity. I will forward under separate cover a letter designating such from the Department of Health Services at which time we would decide to this alternative. With regard to the drainage and grading plans including topographical information surrounding the site, this is found in the second supplement submitt.ed by J.A.C. Planning. The final utility plans , 1,:,e. w4t.er supply,, mains, sewerage treatment, will be forthcoming pursuant to some final determinations by the Department of Health Services:. With regard to the twenty ( 20) foot buffer area, please note Section 100-213 is for residential use. The only adjoining parcels are not of that zone, they are HB and MMII. Please note that parking on. the enclosed plan has been scaled to town: specifications. and until final construction plans are drawn with regard -to the renovation of the restaurant, we cannot locate the handicapped 'spaces. I :have followed up with Mr. Victor Lessard.. I assume you have a copy of his. •letter dated June 21, 19*90, if not; I have enclosed a co.py ;of same. The proposed restaurant, although significant .expansion is, included, will not be a demolition project but rather a renovation: and expansion.. It is my understanding from rulings the Building, Department has received from all agencies involved, this w1il not constitute a. special e�cception use. 4 � Bennett. Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board July 9., 1990 Paige 2 The' uti.lity building noted has been changed to reflect a beat storage .and r:epaif facility of tha same dimensions. Please note this i-s a permitted use, not an accessory us.e, in :the district and should not require action by the Zoning Board of Appeals. It is my understanding a precedent has been s-et with regard to, this use by the- Port of 'Egypt. appli:catio.n. We vol assert and request building permits on the hasit: o.f pre=eXisting foot prints upon which we have :kept a hliil4ng oertdfi.c'ate after the demolition of the south, s.to:.tao�p building and after the hurricane demolished the north .buiidimg. As it i.s noted in your letter of April 30th, the fuel tanks are not satisfactory. We have re-evaluated and amended the site plan and. located same to the south easterly corner :al-lowing fuel t'ruck's ingress and egress in a more ;satisfactory fashion. Pursuant to Section 1.00-237 (.j ) we have reduced the. stor:age capacity of the two 10.,000 gallon fuel tanks to a dapacity• of two 8,1.000 gallon fuel tanks . It also- noted that the lighting system is not acceptable. Please- note we have amended same stating the light .post will be. shi;elded so the field of illumination will be contained on. site. I. woul.d like a review by your Board on the enclosed site plan, fully :aware that the Suffolk, County Department of Heatlh Services criteria and ancilliary facilities have not been answered. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Wejnry hR aro , Jr. HER:.ml Enc. CO: Southold Town Building department - Victor Lessard Southold Town Truste .Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Carr McGuire Group, Inc. J:A.C. Planning Niego Associates B. Laing Associates 5 U( U 2- MAY I PLANNING BOARD M.XMBERS so TT L. HARR) Bennett Orlowski, Jr.,Chainnan Lfii Supervisor Gcorse-Ritchie-Laiham, Jr. TOWN OF.SMS1 Ji Rithatda Ward 11, 5309 5-MAip. Mark.S. McDonald P.O. Box 11 79 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold,New York I Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516)765-182 April 30, 1990 Henry Raynor Raynor-Suter Hardware 320 Love Lane Mattitudk, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for M*arina Day Club SCTM # 1000 117-8-18 Dear Mr. Raynor, The Planning Board has reviewed the revised site plan and supporting documentation that were submitted on April 9th and 16th. This material was al,so reviewed by the Building Department. These comments incorporate the review of both departments. This plan shows a less intensive development proposal than the plan that was the subject of the environmental. impact, - statement. The reduction in intensity and the reconfiguration. of the marina so that it lies within the New York State grant lines bring the site plan into closer compliance with the findings of the draft environmental impact statement. However, the revised plan does not incorporate sufficient information to enable the* Planning Bpard, and the coordinating agencies, to complete the environmental review. The following information is needed in order to proceed: 1. Written confirmation is needed from Robert Jewell of the Suffolk County Department of Health services as to what type of water .supply and water treatment system will meet the Health Department' s standards. The location and space requirements of these systems must be shown on the site plan. 2. Drainage and grading plans must include topographical contours within 200' of- the property boundaries. 3. Utility plans should show location of electric lines, water supply wells and .mains, and the sewage treatment system. 4. A 20' buffer area should be shown, as per Section 100-213 of the Zoning code. 5. Parking spaces must be .provided in accordance with the. requirements of Section 100-191 A. of the Zoning Cb.de. (The location of handicapped parking spaces must be indicated.) Your client may need to include additional information depending on how he choses to respond to the. following facts: The proposed restaurant building represents a significant expansion of area over that of the two existing buildings. A Special Exception will have to be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals to permit this use. A support and utility building is not listed as a principal use in the Marine Business district. Therefore this building is an accessory structure. Accessory structures may not be located. within the front yard, and may not exceed 181 feet in height. A variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals will have to be obtained in order to site this building as designed. The building permit that reserved the footprint of the boat storage and repair building expired. Therefore, the Town no longer recognizes this footprint as a non-conforming structure. A variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals will have to be obtained in order to locate the building as shown on the site plan. The location of the fuel tanks is not satisfactory. A tank trailer delivering fuel would block the traffic flow in the traffic circle. And, the distance between the tanks and the fuel pumps on the outermost dock is needlessly long. A better location would be between the travel-lift slip and the southerly property line. The proposed lighting system is not acceptable. Redesign the system using lighting fixtures of 18' in height, or less, that also focus the light downward. The plan does Tiot indicate whether a public address system will be installed. A .drawing of the directory sign was not included on the plan. Section 100-237 (J) of the Zoning code allows a total of 20,000 gallon$ of petroleum products to be stored within all tanks, pipelines, buildings, structures and accessary equipment designed, used or intended to be used for the storage of gasoline, fuel oil., kd•ros.ene :etc. within one thousand (10000) .. feet of tidal waters. The site plan shows the installation-of two 10;,-006 gallot fuel tanks. If these tanks are for boat fuel only, -where 'will the .fuel tanks for the- heating system. and the generator, for the restaurant, support 'building' and boat repair buildii1g be located-?- If you have any questions about the contents of this letter., please contact Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner. Upon receipt of revised plans that address the matters listed in this letter, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman VS/vs cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector f John M.. Bredemeyer,III, President, Trustees Gerard P. G.oehringher, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Tom Wickham, Chairman, Planning & Zoning Committee Robert Jewell, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Chatles. Lind, Suffolk County Department of Planning David Morrell, New York State., Department of Environmental Conservation Peter P.. Walsh, Coastal Resource Specialist, Department of State 4 fir PELLETREAU & PELLETREAU PETER v.smyoep ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW JOHN J.HART ROBERT S.FIELLETRIV JOHN J.ROE, 20 CHURCH STREET-BOX I 10 418RI-19,431 FREDERIC L.ATWRICKARD A.SCHOENFE OOD PATCHOGUE. NEW YORK 11772 BRUCE r.*'WkLLACE_ KEVIN A.SEAMlkg*- TEL.S1.6 447-13900. R0I3ERT-H.;PE4I,4TRV V*XNE8'5A4 .SWEEMAN- or COUN%L BENJAMIN L_I-ItRZWE-IG FAX 516 47.5'5651 POV9LONS J..-LkROS.E 447-8906 ---------- JAMt�CoAMAND 'AI,5O`.61DMJtTSD IN FLORIDA �Mnlil 4. 1.98.9 U 011 Totin of Southold TO= Ha 11 53b95 Main Road sbothold, New York 11971 i Attn: C4airman. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman of the Planning Board Re:, Marina•Bay Club, New Suffolk, New York -Suft'alk, Cbunt*y. Tex. Map No. 117-8-18 -Dear Chairman Orlowski: I am in receipt of your letter dated March 29, 1989 regarding the FEIS an- the Rarina Bay Club. The FEIS due date was extended ' by the Board From its original date of Fe-bruary 2. 19829 to April 3, 1989. Sinceyour, letter. staters that the site plan must be revised to coriform with the new zoning code under the master plan. we would appreciate knowidg exactly what changes are necessary. We have already submitted several supplements to the DEIS and do 'not think it necessary to prepare an additional supplement. We await -your reply. Thank.y6u. Very truly yours... P NIETREAU & FELLETREAU J004 J. Ita-Irt. cc:. See additional Rider 000=98 b y `y Sc+�1 fjrJ t'TJ� I ,��_ t x'31 ' 1', �+•� `e � � k TV. 7; P�•e'�,'I RVN ( t .' Town Hall. 53095 Main Road 9 P.4, Box'11:79 `: ,ti ;`�. k FM �{ a. i�► Southold;New Yolk 11971 nLTPHONE TOW OF SCOUT!—,• L D .(516)'165.198 - PLANNING BOARD OFFICE. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i February. 2, 199.0 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Matti.tuck, ICY 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Marina Bay Club New Suffolk SCi'M # 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed your January 12., 1990 letter in which you requested confirmation of ten separate elements that will be addressed on the revised site plan for. Marina Bay Club. The Planning Board looks forward to reviewing a revised site plan incorporating the proposed changes noted. in the letter. At that time it will be better able to confirm whether the elements you discussed in your letter meet with the findings set forth in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. By way of reference, a copy of the Board' s March 29, 1989 letter is included herein. This letter outlines the procedure that this Board will follow in. order to complete the environmental review process- once the revised site plans are submitted. When. the revised site plans are submitted, the Board would atppre6iate clarification of the following numbered items in your Letter: *2. The position of the north and south basin boundaries relative to the grant line should be made clear. #3. The percentage of expansion relative tdthe existing square footage of the restaurant building should be notedlon the site plan. #6. The storage building on the northwest corner of the property must have a use assigned to it, and the appropriate parking provided for that use. With regard. -to .# & in your letter, since the state-mandated environ. review-process has not been completed, this Board will.-be- roquire:d to. forward the revised site pl4his, and the draft -or E'tndl -impact'!ztdtemezi'ts to thp. New York State: Department •of Ehviromnen.tal Conservation. fortheir review and oomment. If thexe are any. further. 'questions or- -=noernz., please ,do nqt .hesitate 'tQ.,contact. ;this;- office. Very Truly Yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Vs:hp Enc. co; Richard. Carr Victor Lessard, Building Department John Bredemeyer, III, President, Trustees Board FRANK A. KUJAWSKI,JR., President ___X C=: -TELEPHONE ALBERT J. It2UPS91;;JR.,Vice-President - .(516) 765-1892 JOHN-M. BREDEMEYER, 1H JOHN L. BEDNQSK1,JR. HENRY P. SMITH 1.90-ARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN'OF SO-UTHOLD Town Hall, 53695 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971. TO: Bennett- Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board From: Frank A. K.ujawski, Jr. , President Town Trustees Re., Angel Shores & Marina Bay Club Date: July 27, 1988 MARINA BAY CLUB - Investigate providing a portion of the Project for' Marine Commercial and/or Fishing Industry consistent with State Grant of underwater land on. the site. ANGEL SHORES The Third alternative would. be the best besides the no action alternative. KF O� TELEPHONE i (516).765-1992 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES - TOWN OF SOUfHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road F.O. BOX 728 Southold,New,York 11971 August 13,, 1985 I Mr. Glenn E. Just I The- Land -Use Company P. O. ,Box 361 ! North- Country Road Wading River, .New York 11792 Re: The Marina Bay Club i _ I Dear Mr. Just: .Please be advised that theiBoard of Trustees .have Tabled your application at a regular meeting of the i Board which was held on August 1, 1985. I Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith., President Board of Town Trustees I HPS:ip 1 i i I 541. _ . ; T - P11 5 " 80A 4F TO..' i TRL'5 'EES T4WN•:gPWU. -SOLO Town Hak1,'0095-Main.Road Southold Ne York;i'19 1 AP'PL1C94:TI'Qial 1:S jAERZ0Yz 11+ITib -THE TOWi1! TRtisTEl;R• "Of THE TOWN-j•DF OV'tF10tT,b.. 4fRFC}K• ; Q i!1I'Y;,. Pitw-'Y RIC .i*OR ;.heti 1'$RIJAN 1..9 OF A PE'1 1°1' P�[t7SxI.RI�4' ' TQ: TFI$ I-ASS.. ':'0ftV :KMjr,,$.S AND REOULAT- � 'THE CQA: i'.RL At41.N £°I;; ,FI I..Mg.TA: IR- .. .•isl.ao�a .�?�,A l�ts..41NCi L1RA�111 ►6 AR,A$ Os T1F oa6t t r:4F . :F7`-"0jW0, AND. THE •!s.$u�tNC.E Q0- P£RhF�'I'S. 3F[JR.$tj. T. u'rilo4�t• , ' OF APPLI:CrAT-IQNI June 17, 1985. ' - CS16)-929-35 IR4N3`-#�Ty Q•IF APPL:i:GANT, _The .Marina Bay Club c/.o 4an, Us:e Ca: P:ki4NE NO ADDRESS OF APPLICANT �• 0. Box 3661-N. Country Rd. , Wading River, N.Y. ' 1179.2 • '"�`�AX 'M•AP -NQS.. .. G1eni; .E . JustjA� gent/La.n.d '.Use Co .-.01-0-9Z9-357SENT pklioN£ NO. RE:RM1tT.REQi}LSTEIJ TO. Apel i i+a_nt rnn.sps tn. rgnns'11t U: . an exist img -marina by ins'ta,lling 13'0 slips , catwalks ,; and- floats . Area .will be mai.ntenence ,. Will .bre ! r,.e:mQved. and _p.laced landward of proposed, 680' of new, bulkhead. LQG#►''.�O L �4F PROPERTY >=QA WH1CH er M-[-T: WAN.T:ED Zain §t. New •S�j fo _ "ONZ ADDRESS OF PgRMA T APPI,i CANT I F -DIFFERENT' FROM AFQR$SA1 D .4.00AT I Ori.. P.O . -Box 361-N•,. Country Rd-, Wadlin.g River, N.Y. 11792 Ci EEK, !DAY ;9.1$ ;[r84�MIX4; PROPERTY CUtchogue EiarbOr JJ 36.7'x3-38 ' S I ZF OF PROPOSED, WORK i.SNGTIi 367 *IDTK 338' HE I.QHT ABOVIi HI DH WA'T'ER n/a DEPTH BELOW LOW HATER YARDS TO SE F-XCAVATEED ap12r.ox. 221000. 0 Y YARDS TO SE F I L:LE D none W UPTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY F RON.I-ING PROPERTY500 ' DEPTH AT LOiV. TIDE; 3' AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2 . 5' DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL_ 75,1 FT, .DISTANCE: PROJECT 9XT9NRS pKY01HD SIMILAR PR.OJJECTS 114 T-ktg. AREA 0 FT lS TIIiS FGt; PRI.1�A';Ek OR .13US[.N SS USE?. Business>" AREA toN;,Nq�commercial MANNER IN WHICH "TERIAL WI:L.L 89 REMOVED OR REPO-SiT E.D Barge with crar.. I INtEN-DE»D USE OF PROPERTY Commerei.Al Marina ^ D.ES OR I BE ANY KNOWN PRIOR.. OPE RAT I ONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE �-Qua. AND WKETHER ANY PRIOR, L I CENSE OR E'9-14M 1 TS HAVE E EN 1 SSLJED To 'Enit .cT STRUC'i URI S OR TO.. DREDGEZ.•OR .DEEPOS.1 T F E LL ON SA 1 D PREM 1 SI±S: AND. WHETHER ANY PERVITS OR -LICENSES WERE EVER, SUSP.ENDED OR R9V0-KED BY A GONERNMENTAI 1lGEESICY none DESCRIBE. .FULLY THE REFIAB i L•I•TAT I ON AND 'PRQPOSED CONDITION' OF THE 1 I S6I15E;$ AFTER THE; WORK IS COM1?4E:T1 D .XNCLUDB AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE I'•ROJEYCT .SITE IF ME3CS,SSARY none WRI.TTEk CONS AIT ._OF Tk112 OWNI R QEF THE PROPERTY, I F NOT THE SAME AS T11E enclosed ARPLICANT.�� -., ✓ BOARD OF :TOWN TRUSTEES - y TOWN .OF I SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I*ORM Projeet Intonnatlon (To j1e completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) I;. Applicaritlaponso(. 2. Project blame Gi.eitn E. Just of the Land Use Co. The Marina Day Club 3. Proiect lijcaiiorr Mur!10party Nf�s Suffolk � County Suf:£o1k 4.. Is proposed action: Q New t_t Fxpami" JaModificationJalteratiort 5. Desuil3erolect briefly; AgP: cA>it. .,prvpos.e:s to to an existing maxina by ig .tall lig tiwralks , and floats. Area will be maintene•nee ,dredged tQ._ 5x a€ mean low -water. Approxi>Dately 22, 00'(7 c ..y. of sand V-111b�,-ramove�d nd.;.placed Landward of proposed 680•' :of. new bulkhead. 6::Pte"lse lC adofl.(toad intefi ections,prominent'landmarks,etc.or-provide map) Main' St. , New Suffolk (see enclosed map) 7. Amount of-land affected: Initially 0 acres Ultimately 0 acres 8. Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? Q-yes! ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. Whit is present land use In vicinity of project?? (3Residential ❑ industrial 30 Commercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parklandlopen space ❑ Other Describe 10. Does ion involve a.permit/approval,or funding,now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency.(Federal,state or local)? Yes E1,N* If yes,list agency(s)and Perm itlapprovals U. S.D.O.A. pending N.Y..5.D,.B. C. pending 11. Does any.aspect of_'the action have a currently vaild permit or approval?' ElofYes t: CNo If yes,list agency name and permitlapproval type i 12. As result of proposed action will existing permit/approval require modification?• ❑ Yes ❑ No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicdntlsponsor name: Glenn E._ Just of the Land Use Co. as agent Date: June 19, 198 for the Marina Bay Club Signature•. ..s dOUNTY OF SUFFOLK SITATE OF Vw YORK JSS: 7:3_��_ 0,0 -the I-OwI8 (JSe. CO. ct's CL; ,\0, BEING DULY S;PWORN. DEPOSES AND SVP. THAT mr. C 'is tHE; •Aj:,PL.i.qAx-,r y�oft. Irki.9 AD-QV4 DESCRIBED PERMIT.*, kAT �,iL _S�TA--TK9-F.NTS ffF_fWjU ARE 't UE TO THE BEST T CONTAUNti) -of 141--s AND A'.I;Lj Ar, Tki-kt .1'1Z WORK. Wl':jLL BE' .13PNE: TN THS frlGA'Tfi I It 141S APPI:I.CAT I OAT AK0_­ AS MAY 89 AP :P RIOVO By T. 'Hg. t-OWN It Iwo. -.4319.A ,P or T TjOWN OF S bTHq-'4.D. -A. -.J.!C.AN-T .-AGRess to P. K-011611): THE,TdVN. .0,-F !SQt;T"O1,D- A.N.b. TRA TOWN :0-lirm rg JIISIY, -6 ALL -Aqb _LAIM$- AltItING. •qKPMR! d 8Y V•1 i2TUE Y- V-1itt-us OF SA.[0 PlOulli-T. �y 0"'N't4b.. SIGNATURE 0;c7pj? ]CANT. , SWORN To is ME TH-1 S DAY OF 19 CHARLES W. BOWMAN 140TARY "K,State A New 'York NOTARY PVatug, 4668958- S-ttga r-curity Aurh 30. 19 EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVER "BOAT,riorKP, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAP.TER 32) DISAPPRQVED "WETLANDS PERM lT" (C.JlAPTZR 97) IDISAPPRovr6s) "J4QAT5,DOCKS, WHARVES'! IRERMIT (CHAFFER 3A) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY :S I GNAt LIRE OF CkiA-I RMAN COMPL)TATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 ? "1589 1542 FROM 3i1�aaing Associates TO p,$2 ; VARIES f .? DECKMA 2"x G" StEETiNG 1XI x.to"'x=BRACIf� - ,�r Y BEhtTTHEt� - i EL..-a.0 '. SL`8.0 TO -10.0. (YARIE-5). TYPICAL FIXED STRUCTURE. WDECK MARMA 13,Xy CLUB ASS'O IATES. 5OVTHOLD TOWNSw-1p Be AING ASSOCIATE N��+V SUFFOLK ��w YORK ��rg !-�out�r9 3=�t�1g89 5K.329 w0©� 4'ter- 4 A FiXK tlTpvc,VgL lvPLC %7 (7) 0.0 j xes5i .4 r-U-r.:iqo.(,Vr- LOPT15J6 PLATrof, Aq to VAIN 5T k tf. fLOA1.1 9C- MATYORM J-Q,O ' -r ;!) der 3S'Ir" 5k?) -R;GTl ------------ DODO-t.. Nq NLw -PLAN VVEW- f. t, }PROPOSFly ACTION T.-? PiLt* F-14-5 mr MLw;MHw 0 tNCI I)F—. A A 14 + MSW k�L 0-.014 T 1 NUO-US R.C. CAP rlEL. AST M A•36 Mn LW I I - MSL .. 1 1----f—-- --1 . I MLV 7-r S7F-EL TiF- Rot-, G" C.C. 5TF-EL SqErl, dq T) j. ASTM- A- X143 -M Lw 5ECTION VJF-W B.La-incl. Agsai#aces' .51rl N OF bLLKHE.IA 260 -Mailft Str&!t t,- PIER -k Y -Tr I 3 Y0 -ut� 0w -u HC)UUE HARI�:Oft P i, SvFFOLK . W&thpbip--, 7- Y' �U.PT6LK �rrATF-:k-Yi f J-"•Film... C:e pva Lv. Ac 1� 13'-1il To t4 11%tt .'X :. z a�xc►a 40' • - Z -10 117tp Wim X ATZ aMATOM - 44, pXiS�lly 5� 1�E5 ..J • `�, J � �"!D j�iZANr�I✓ piZ�pQ,S>iyll MActzl NAr •2.7-ro•�J2'�u1.D �O�cTs=��' . . . . _ iN C IAT( AWA1* NAlt�l� pAjAT WI�W614'rflo�X,-04040f LI M= rnEAN ► �t�v�, so>�Fj�b-p,r vuNTY A pu xt�b, �'Go.M �Gt L 19atGKI NIS suf �Ka ST�?E b F kirm yoek WNL*.5Uff LX (16WV6I.6Ti� WLJ,Tl,1G• 044 ST. 114% AF-pLicATlo �Y T�;�aLI.7kOtD P V;1.4pWW j CORP? 471F �+"AVS N.Y. mmn4A eow ??J, A u- AwA La,iial- ;.`C H it .I-�1.c t7 �►5� Ga. �vA t�I� f�tv�t� r�.Y. S�t6'� � c F I r. . VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. June 12, 2005 - { Albert J. Krupski,Jr. D � U E Chairman,Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 JUN V02005 Southold,NY 11971 ' Southold Town RE: PROPOSED BOAT RACKS .Board of Trustees Dear Ms. Woodhouse: This letter serves to convey my opposition to the large scale development of the New Suffolk waterfront at First and Main Streets. As a resident of New Suffolk for nearly twenty years,I have witnessed the slow but constant erosion of our town's character and historical foundation. In the last few years,however,the rate and scale of"development" is simply disheartening. The proposal to build boat racks is the final measure to usurp the remaining vestiges of a residential community and to replace it with blatant commercialism. The boat racks serve no legitimate purpose for the residents of New Suffolk. If the proposal were passed and implemented,our hamlet's character would be irreversibly altered. Not only would the racks clash with the historic downtown homes,they would_ dwarf them as well. Even if we could get past the negative visual aspects of the racks themselves,their size would still block the view of the Bay along First Street. Not only will the racks destroy the downtown's beauty,but the associated`ftffic,noise, and pollution will also irreparably_impact the town and quality of life. There are no provisions whatsoever for dampening noise, abating pollution,or controlling traffic. For two hundred years,New Suffolk residents have managed,to enjoy the waterfront without the boat racks. The only people to benefit from these racks are the developers. The Town,the residents,the waterfront,and the marine life will be destroyed. Since the proposal for the racks is economically driven,it is necessary to state that the property values will surely decrease when the racks go up. The boat racks are to-allow people to enjoy the bay,yet their very installation prevents New Suffolk residents from doing just that! So one must ask,whose interest are at stake? The residents' or the developer's? I strongly urge the board to stop this project and to work to preserve the hamlet's character rather than destroying it. Danielle Hauss a PO Box 226,New Suffolk,N/Y��11956 Jerry Schultheis PQ Box 2y0, 1640 Firsi SUuei New Suffolk, IVT 11956-0299 63"i-7.3'-1265 schul 270attg1obal.net June i 3,2005 r fAs. Jehiyn B.Woodhouse E C E Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board D N 2005 SOUi11olU TUM]Hail J 4 PO Box 1'179 Southold, NY i i 97i Southold Town Dear-Pv1s.vdvwhouse Board of Trustees I wouid tike io take iris opportunity to warment on the joint meeting held on the application of Matt-a- Mar on the Bay Marina in New Suffolk in May of 2005 which,_I attended. As a stakeholder who participated in the Hamlet Study for New Suffolk t am thoroughly convinced that this is not an appropriate project to be undertaken in this community. I had believed that a scaled down project might be worthy of consideration but after witnessing the recent actions of Mr. Raynor to purposely create parking problems in New Suffolk I believe that the owner of the Marina is not a person who will respect the wishes of the neighborhood nor be a good neighbor. His initial actions in limiting the parking for Legends was clearly an act to annoy the neighborhood, but his further actions of June a and again on June a when he purposely parked derelict unregistered trailers on the public roads in the public right of way surrounding his property to prevent parking on the public streets dearly signaled the sentiment and arrogance of the owner that will prevail. In completing the review of the project it is critical that a positive SEQUA declaration be made for the project. The history of the site regarding its use and previous projects proposed clearly indicate a positive declaration to be in order. There is a long history of possible contamination which must be addressed. The adoption of the LWRP requires that its requirements of review be followed. This will be the first utilization of the LWRP in the town and will be the acid test of its effectiveness. The designation of the entire North Fork as a scenic vista needs to be enforced by denying this scar on the landscape. The review meeting touched on some existing as well as new issues which need to be addressed. These include the following: 1) The issue of who owns what land or underwater land and who has the rights to it needs to be determined.The legality and ownership of the underwater land grants need to be resolved. 2) There will be a catastrophe just waiting to happen with all of the fuel stored in the boats if the racks are allowed to be constructed.A boats fuel tank is typically filled for the winter to prevent condensation from forming in the fuel tank. The racks will handle up to a 15,000 pound boat. If you look at four approximatel0, 000 pound boats (Pursuit 3370, Grady White 330, Century 3100 and a Boston Whaler 31 SF)you will find that each boat holds an average of 325 gallons of fuel. A total of 153 boats would contain a total of 50,000 gallons of volatile fuel spread over the entire area of the racks. The typical high winds which exist in the area will spread havoc far and wide if a fire erupts in one of the boats. The boats will be wrapped in shrink wrap which will emit toxic fumes when burned. I personally am aware of 3 fires started by defective battery chargers that started fires in the last year. The conflagration will be worse than any forest fire and it can be whipped all over the area of the Hamlet Center by the ever present winds. Input from the Cutchogue Fire Department as to their ability to handle such a disaster must be solicited. • Page 2 June 13,2005 3) 1 personally found it interesting when Mr. Raynor indicated that Chuck Hamilton of the NYSDEC has taken a position that rack storage of boats is the preferred method of storage. What has this world come to when the DEC advocates such blight on the scenic environment? If in fad this is true then we need to examine the policies of the DEC I believe that this issue needs to be confirmed with the DEC. What is to happen with our scenic vistas?What is the DEC's position on the toxic cocktail of battery acid, oil, fuel, sea water and coolant that drains from the bilges of the boat when the boat is taken out of the water and the drain plug is removed? 4) Transit of travel lifts and fork lits over the publicly owned portions of Main Street and First Street need to be prohibited. A fork lift capable of carrying a 10 ton boat weighs 26 tons for a total weight of 36 tons.This will cause extensive damage to the public roads. It appears that it will be difficult if not impossible to access the southern portion of the property without traveling on the public roads. 5) There is no provision for rest rooms for the boaters or pump outs for the heads on the boats. Go to any Marina and watch the boaters make the mad dash to the rest room when they dock Where will they go to relieve themselves?The last thing we want to see is public urination in the New Suffolk Hamlet Center. The temptation will be very strong to dispose of the wastes overboard into Cutchogue Harbor rather than leave it in the holding tank The nearest pump out is on Schoolhouse Creek at the New Suffolk shipyard. Can the shipyard handle the incised demand and more importantly can Schoolhouse Creek accommodate the increased traffic. The creek can only accommodate one passage in either direction in or out at its entrance. Mr. Raynor indicated he has a portable pump out facility in Mattituck It will be impossible to move the pump out facility between the two facilities to meet the immediate demand for pump out at both facilities. Mr Raynor indicated that the boats would have porta- potti's and that the boat owners would take the waste home for disposal. A Porta-Potti might be found on a 22'or smaller boat but you will not find such a device on a boat weighing up to 15000 pounds. How many people are actually going to take such a cargo home with them in a hot crowded vehicle? 6) Mr. Raynor claimed that the boats in rack storage are not bottom painted so there will be no pollution from toxic bottom paint In an ideal environment if all the boats were brand new they would not have to be bottom painted. In the real world most of the boats stored in the racks will have been previously used and already bottom painted. When the bottom paint is not periodically maintained the paint starts to fall off in large pieces. The scraping of the forks on the fork lift on the bottom of the boat will add to the amount of paint that is deposited on the ground. 7) At the review meeting a statement was made by the Highway Superintendent that there was no negative impact of taking the parking away from Legends and that parking is not a problem. Tell that to the people trying to find a parking space on the evening of June 10th. Those boat owners who will be expected to park their vehicles under the 3 layers of boats above them will refuse to do so as soon as they realize that the hard wired bilge pumps in the boats will automatically pump out the toxic contents of the bilge all over them. This will cause further parking problems on the local streets. Parking should not be allowed under the stored boats. 8) It was further indicated by the Highway Superintendent that parking could be accommodated on First Street. One of the recommendations made by the stakeholders was that parking be prohibited on the east side of First Street south of Orchard because of the difficulty of turning right onto First from Orchard because of cars parking on the east side of First Street You also have the situation of all the boats stored at Captain Marty's on trailers which are continually moved to and from First Street creating traffic jams and unsafe conditions. The trailers extend out into the public right of way and prevent panting on the streets.Access to a private parking lot should be via a specific curb cut and not along the entire right of way. Significant potential parking is not available due to the private commercialization of the eastern end of Kng Street v • Page 3 June 13,2005 to the bay.The town even maintains a street light to illuminate this private commercialization of a public street This public street should provide additional parking opportunities and provide the residents with access to the waterfront from the end of the road. 9) Where will all of these boats be refueled since there is no refueling facility at the Marina nor is there one planned. Again the nearest facility is New Suffolk Shipyard on Schoolhouse Creek and I have previously addressed the limitations of utilizing this facility. 1 believe the fuel storage tanks at the shipyard only contain 4000 gallons. It is my opinion that all larger marinas in the town should have refueling facilities, rest rooms, and pump out facilities. 10) It is a well known fad that not too far below the ground surface in this area of New Suffolk is an impregnable layer of day which will prevent peroolation of waste material into the ground below. This condition demands a full environmental assessment of the site because of its history of use. 11) A concept was raised that would swap the eastern terminus of Main Street for parking on some other portion of the Marina site. The eastern end of Main Street and the views it affords are a critical part of the waterfront of the Hamlet and must be preserved at all costs. The historical significance of the first submarine base in the country will be cut off from the public. 12) There was some discussion as to the traffic flow of the fork lift and the vehicles to be parked under the racks and in other areas. The layout proposed does not seem to have the possibility to allow the correct flow of traffic and needs professional evaluation. A vehicle with load weighing 36 tons is not going to be able to maneuver like a car. The western boundary of the facility seemed to offer the most difficulty for maneuvering. There will probably not be enough room for all the required parking. 13) The area of land involved must be calculated in order to determine if an area variance is required. 14) The zoning requirements for the MII Zone do not specifically address boat racks. Just as they did not address wind mills boat racks should be taken up by the Zoning Board of Appeals as well. In summary the proposed use for the subject parcel does not make sense. n goes against the concept of the LWRP. It is not consistent with the Stakeholders plan for the Hamlet of New Suffolk It destroys the history of the area. It is not consistent with the scenic vista designation of the North Fork ft is UGLY. Serious consideration needs to be given to pass legislation to prohibit any additional construction of boat racks in the Town of Southold.They do not add to the character of the Town. 1 would also suggest that those candidates now running for Public Office in the town be polled to give them the opportunity to present their views so that when it comes time for the citizens to vote we can make the ri hh decisions. Sincerely, Jerry Schu iar 1 05 CC:Trust Town Bo Cutchogue Fire Department NYSDEC BRIAN A. ANDREWS,ESQ. P.O. BOX 207 NEW SUFFOLK,NEW YORK 11956 631-734-2555 E-Mail: BAndrews@suffolklaw.n Mr. Allen Bauder, Land Surveyor 1 JUN .New York State Office of General Services 1 3 26 thFloor, Tower Building Empire State Plaza Southold Town Albany,New York 12242 Board of Trustees Re: New Suffolk Land Grant 1838 State of New York To Ezra Youngs, et al. Dear Mr. Bauder:. As set forth in our recent telephone conversation, I am a resident of New Suffolk,New York, and have concerns with respect with a certain land use proposal currently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board and Trustees. Specifically, my concern is with an application for the erection of a boat racking system on property that abuts or is part of the land that is subject to the above-referenced grant. A copy of the original grant along with a transcript of same is enclosed herewith. Inasmuch as by the terms and conditions of the grant, the State of New York has retained a residual interest in the land, it is clear that the State should be a party to the aforementioned application process. Abdication of the State's rights to lands under navigable waters is not consistent with the exercise of the public trust whereby the State is required to preserve such waters for the use of the public. The control of such waters of the State can never be lost except as to such parcels that are utilized in promoting the interest of the public. Smith v. State of New York, 133 A.D.2d 737, 545 N.Y.S.2d 203 (2d Dept.1989). In light of the Court's findings in the Smith case, it would appear that the scope of the review in the instant matter include not only whether the proposed use promotes commerce, but also as to whether the proposed use promotes interests of the public. Allow me to thank you for your consideration of this request. Respectfully submitted, Brian A. Andrews Enclosure Southold Town Board 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11-971 Southold Town Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 r .A e - r t . . . The 3rd day of April 1838 . . . The People of the State of New-York, by the Grace of God, Free and Independent: To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting: KNOW YE, That for the purpose of promoting the Commerce of this State, and for no other object or purpose whatsoever, and with the reservations and upon the conditions.hereinafter mentioned, WE have given, granted and confirmed, and by i these Presents, DO give, grant and confirm unto Ezra Youngs&Abiel Tuthill Ira B. Tuthill and Isaac T. Tuthill All that certain tract or piece of land covered with water lying and being in Southold Bay in the town of Southold, and County of Suffolk and adjoining the lands,of the said Ezra Youngs, Abiel Tuthill, Ira B. Tuthill and Isaac T. Tuthill in the Village of New Suffolk in said town and county and bounded on the west of by Common highwater mark and extends �. across Main Street in said Village and runs one hundred and fifty feet North from the Northerly side of said Street and South one hundred and fifty feet from the Southerly side of said Street, and extending from the said line of common highway mark eastward into said Bay three hundred feet below common low water mark the north and South boundary lines running due east from the extremes of the said western boundary line at high water mark and the Eastern boundary line of said tract or piece of land under water, being parallel to said western boundary line. P r Together wth all and singular the rights, hereditaments and appurtenances to the same belonging: s Excepting and Reserving to ourselves all Gold and Silver Mines: And also excepting and reserving, to all and every the said People, the full and free right, liberty and privilege, of entering F and upon and using, all and every part of the above described premises, in as ample a manner as they might have done had this grant not been made, until the same shall have been actually appropriated and applied to the purposes of Commerce, by erecting Docks and Wharves thereon, C and filling in the same: To Have and to Hold the above described and granted premises, subject _ to the reservations aforesaid, unto the said Ezra Youngs& Abiel Tuthill, Ira B. Tuthill and Isaac r T. Tuthill their heirs and assigns forever. Provided nevertheless, and these Presents are upon this express condition,that if our said grantees their heirs and assigns, shall not, within two years from the date hereof, actually appropriate and apply all and every part of the above decribed lands, to the purposes of commerce, by erecting docks and wharves thereon, and filling in the same, then these Presents, and everything herein contained,,shall cease and determine, so far as relates to any part of the granted premises which shall not have been so appropriated and applied. In Testamony whereof, We have caused these our Letters to be made Patent, and the Great Seal of our said State to be hereunto affixed: . . . . Passed the Secretary's Office, the 3rd day of April 1838 .�Jjpi a rp1+7� • 1 1�?'/7 "!P , J7'r� rj ' '%°� t �:,. -�� ��u��-p, �sc�.,`�-y�'� �� ��•t•� ;�/tn7l.ti!> n/7�� '�' , �'f �r � � � / •� ,, � � �• ' / � 1, l' 11 Z ,71�1� ►.v�7t�+�o!) �•>>%� uU� v »�o �o�tc�•tt�7 �7a1-;L7 �� �/ J• J' �1 u �ssr-yrs -� alie ?7•� r.,, ►.tet 1 irr s,ra J�� . • 00orl •M1i r'r Yl -� " _ � /�' 7'X>� O �97/+' ?/!'Z /177,0 7,' / ".f• /J.�.�y.�ljt� �yp,.✓!� �� ��l�r��.. •..pn��•- �.s .?Zp/•-�) la7 ,j �+tt•O� �I .•t 9,�� iJ -/)3 , I,79 •� :�nGp >>tn!' �rr7J�J' / )7 OIn�► .�t?�?!�/� r,�7»IJ'' y7�n /-1,,,�•)�� 7,-n -y] -q Q )rt too tr ,9 , „,7v 4 „ZJ 7 r✓? 71 f » N r�xri J7t J� „ „ 711 r I l 7Vi �/ »�1� 10 n7- r 9t. 77p tn, ,� 7f7 727 r 77(> ��� rm 1�,�� 9�'»/i - .17 ,774)7 �,>.r� - hr7f'�J 1 - » /'Y ,JJ �J //' �!F 7,7�J �»„l7 o�tar Tn:r�firoa tlutl )Tr».Irl 4ao.rf► ()(I DR, ac, �/�' /iq )►rrn ')►ar,►.r�/' �, J • tuba urT pa)+nic , ':raaT6 ea rl :�r41 f raTro>>Tcaua .ta�f»Tr�a.ratj rrrm)�pTrn:I :Iy� trnrf>a 1rTITI RTrnT�I1��.�3t;a.r .aye.+��rm p i r. ptro `.caaaos)nyot aso(Tlnri ro )cargo .ra+j)o ors .rof Tl;rn `a1171,C' Rfr(? fo aararrrum pip Ptr>>n+tro.rtl ;�, axv�l.rTrtL a - opyi .Rnf )»'l,T, `a1t 1�t()ISjI : nurs�:tiT� ��trroa IJcrTa R)uaFaa�T OR-ITT) 111m[�� 01 TT'' ".j, 1rrnT,rraclarrrT Prrn, ^�� �� `l 0� J� 77Y:.T9 31�� Sq 1 JJO jo )1 i �tw ' il't►c:i~�rti,:u taitli all ct,td sirtgtellt,• the rights, heredilutnents and appurtenances to the same belonging ; •'� , ;,r; gx�;e ����� n.+d �tedetviiib to ourselves, all Cold and Silver Alines : Aid .aleo e�ceepting auk Aid �cr�111.,, to all aild tm-y the said People, the full and free right, liberty and privilege, of enteruig upon, +=�rar, •. 1t1 using, all and every part of the above described preutisear, in as tunple a »ia�tner as they might oat; u� �� '?� • • �1i11te'hull tliiar y,•tutt ,tut been r►ecnrle, tutu! the carne shall have been actually. appropriated attd applied to ll�e' purpust:ar u�' rcc, L j ercclirtg Ducktr' will Wharves thereon, and filling in the same : `10 ll' �Qe &M 41 lu ljultX the ubuve ,lr.. rribed curt! grunter! prem sesr, b'ubj ct •lu the reservations aforesaid, unto the suit! 4 -4 e. a/ '�� CY/ae ✓Si�ic 4 �J ctJs�C/ .� Gv�'`'� � rlLelese and these 'Presents are upon this ez�leeae euukli- e1 ,ts urevei•. 1rov 4ea veva , i � n• , hewer rind usa ,/ f lieu, that if' vier said yrcinteeC ��.•rt% heirs will assigns, shall riot, within two years from the date herc�f, � •� . _ actually upprulu•iute and apply all an/1,every port of ilea ubuve described (uncle, to the purposes o ew►t- t . thing nteree, by erecting-ducks will Wharves thereon, and filling in the sunw, then these Pre-vents, Urtd every 11C,•Cltt cortltti,ted, shall cease and cictc1-mirte, so fur its relates to any part of the yrartted premisestol.ic:l,. shall not havc been so appropriated wtd applied. a I1� '1e�liwu»Y whereof, We have caused these our Letters to liez Pate tl 'and the Creat Seal uJ r° uta• suit! ,Sliite to be hereunto afft2ed: j(tiTcrt� ' , da o Gt'fz'TGt! 'in CAC gait,• :{ y f t f ucu• suit! �S'lctle, at our. City of.fllbtuty, tlic-� u-i•!J : � • - and'in the i f•our Lurd nue lhuusaiid eight,hundret! civil •tfi�, 1 f uta• Indepe,ttleuce. - e « � '"ti day of 3 �' It ussc•t1 the .�'t:r.,•elur•y's f)•jJ c:c, the � . '� 1 have examined the l,receding Letters Putent, acid tlo 47 • • !tart tkc saute are its IlUe f ur„t of 11810. a`g,e •�� �L �: � i � !/ � ZL - kt • ' � _�. � GLi'sLt�r2Obd:;citl may. tq'i2e A Suzanne E. Fox 10 Kimogenor Point P.O. Box 101 New Suffolk, NY 11956 ;JUN1 —June 9, 2005 X05 Mr. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Board of Town Trustees Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay's proposal to build three-story boat racks holding 153 boats and provide parking spaces for 185 cars would be harmful to New Suffolk and its surrounding waters. The proposal is of too large a scale for and out of character with the hamlet. The site is contaminated with oil, kerosene, lead, copper, gasoline, and other toxic materials. No pump-out station or sanitary facilities are proposed. Cutchogue Harbor already has a large number of boats at moorings, and every year more and more power boats speed around the bay on weekends. Tall, ugly boat racks would block views of the bay. New Suffolk is a small, quiet, off-the-lieaten-path, close-knit community. With little traffic, it is safe for walkers, children on bicycles, and pets. The increased traffic from the proposed project would change all this. As a third-generation resident of New Suffolk, I urge you and all the Trustees to reject Matt-a-Mar's proposal. Sincerely, cc: New Suffolk Civic Association i JUN 1 0 .2005 f Southold Town Board of Trustees ;;- June 8, 2005 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Southold Town Board of Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay 117.-8-18 Dear Mr. Krupski and Board of Trustees: Following the Joint Work Session May 16, 2005, of the Trustees and the Planning Board, there appear to be a number of issues pertaining to the Trustees'jurisdiction that still have not been resolved, as follows. 1) With no fuel pumps on site, can the increased boat traffic entering Schoolhouse Creek to fuel up, in the morning hours when the boats in those marinas will be exiting the narrow channel, be .> tolerated, i terms of safety and'even"pump capacity?'The'safii question applies to`fiieliiig'up at Cutchogue Harbor Marina. ' 2) How much more pollution(153 boats)of the creek and bay waters can be allowed? 3) Are there any specific realistic plans for sanitary and pump-out facilities? How can the bay waters be protected from the onslaught of human waste, garbage, and fuel and other contaminants, with no proper facilities to-contain them? 4) What are the plans for the restaurant? 5) What,are the septic and drainage provisions? 6) Last,but certainly not least, the proposed action must now be consistent with the LWRP, which stresses that"the high degree ofenvironmental sensitivity . . . W�ighlights the need for cacefiil'and lirriited redevelopment"_""arid which refers to "eivvironmental�cleaifuP;of the site prior' to redevelopment." We have had 160 years of toxic substances added to the bay waters, the wetland soil, and upland soil on this site. Will the Trustees, although not the lead agency, recommend to the Planning Board the need for a positive SEQRA declaration? Until all the issues in your jurisdiction.are resolved, I respectfully suggest that the Trustees place a hold on this application and withhold a final disposition. Sincerely, Jo'an Robbins P. S. I would like to be informed of the date and time of the Trustees' site inspection. Thank you for your attention. Cc: E. Brownell Johnston P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 734-6047 �����„, �� m,, � as 2,���j 5 SO���,�J J DECEE WE Albert J. Kmpski, Jr. Chairman M AY* 1 6 2005 Board of Town Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold Town Southold,NY 11971 Board of Trustees May 11, 2005 Dear Mr. Krupski, I've been informed through the New Suffolk Civic Association that a large-scale development is planed for the waterfront area in New Suffolk. Being a resident for 13 years I am shocked and appalled that this project would even be considered for such a small and unique hamlet. It would ruin and destroy this community. There are so many concerns to address before allowing such a massive invasion to change this area. The impact would be felt not only by residents of New Suffolk,but spread out to other towns as well. (What you do to a microcosm will be felt by the macrocosm). The traffic, noise pollution, loss of parking, loss of view, destruction of the old barn are just a few concerns. The environmental impact could be potentially hazardous. Profit should not be the motivating factor to allow this in to action,because in the long run generations will be the ones who will pay for this huge mistake. I walk my dog ever day down by the water here, it is a special spot, and needs careful planning before any change is made. I believe this area could use revitalization, but with a sensitive approach that will take the interests of the environment and people into consideration. Thank you for allowing me to express my views on this matter. Sincerely, Monica Bennett Ms.Rose Liberatore ! P.O. Box 31 , New Suffolk„NY,._11956 ;� p � C � o � � MAY 1 1 2005 ?J Southold To�vn Board of Trustees / !I Town ustees y/ C��znGl/J - t 0 Werner Georg Kunz Monday, May 9, 2005 D .. Mph � 1 2005 .�Y� Albert J. Kmpslu,Jr. Chairman Boat�O T IONOB Town Trustees Southuofai�ustees Boa( Post Office Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Mat-a-Mar Proiect Dear Mr. Krupski, During recent days the above mentioned project has been brought to my attention. As a resident of First and King Street I would like to express my sincere discontent about the nature and size of the Mat-a.-Mar Project. New Suffolk's waterfront along First Street with its quaint and charming ambiance and historic site is certainly not the place for an industrial type development as proposed by the Mat-a-Mar Project. The project is a pollutant in every sense of theword. It will result in visual, noise, air, land and sea pollution. As responsible citizens we need to make every effort to reduce pollution.Yet,the project will increase pollution. To the contrary, in our endeavors to achieving better quality of life the bay nbeds'io.be cleaned up instead and conserve the character of the area. It is a known fact that for decades toxic substances have been let into the bay. Simply, the Mat-a-Mar Project is the wrong project for the wrong place at the wrong time. Following are some issues that loudly speak against the project: 1. Too much traffic on land and sea. Adding 150+ boats and cars will have an enormous impact on the environment. Currently parking capacity is already at its limits with traffic from Legend's. 2. Boat racks planned at 34 feet are much too high and create visual pollution and additionally could pose potential danger in the event of severe storms. 3. The project would eliminate the historic barn,the last original structure on the site. The nature of the business proposed by the project is a foreign body to the area and will not serve nor integrate the community. The site in question has much potential for a new project, yet it needs to incorpora a character of the existing community. cerely, We 'Georg Kunz 1045 First Street-Box 668,New Suffolk,NY 11956 Tel 631734-2374 Mobile 646-610-1199 Email werner@wernerkunz.com CPVO 2 �y o A ,.a�oyd � N — 7-111 / - - -- �t7 r odl i s x'17 PH k F44 Food, Ski st� April 30, 2005 DIANE& DENNIS HARKOFF Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse; D f� r� 1�I f� Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Board IS 1�� 1�5 I Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 MAY 5 2005 Southold,NY 11971 1 Sout!zold Tam � RE: Boat Storage Racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay(New Suffol Board of Trustees Dear Ms. Woodhouse: As you'll see from the attached copy of the 1 st page of a multi-page lease agreement,Love Lane Acquisition Corp. seems to have reacted to our opposition to the boat storage racks in New Suffolk by raising our rent from $400.00 to $1000.00 per month effective 5%1/05. All parties involved in this boat storage rack issue should be aware that we have chosen not to pay this increase. We expect that at some point,the fence, or some similar type of blockade, will be moved closer to the street to prevent our customers from parking there. At such time, we will encourage our customers to revert to parallel parking on,both sides of the street, as it originally was-when Legends opened its doors back in 1993. However,parallel parking will not afford as many parking spaces as "head-in"parking does and most likely will result in overflow parking in front of homes on the streets of New Suffolk. Naturally, we anticipate that this situation will not be well received by our neighbors in the local community. Be aware, that in May 2002, we had formally approached the town with a request to consider diagonal parking on First Street in anticipation of the day when Love Lane/Matt-a-Mar would eliminate this parking area. Although we thought that diagonal parking would afford more parking spaces, the town did not see it the same way. In light of our immediate problem, we will ask the Highway Department if they can re-examine the diagonal parking issue or see if another more clever solution can be found. rely, Diane Harkoff cc: Mr. Albert Krupski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent Highway Department Joan Robbins PO Box 147 New Suffolk,NY 11956 P.O. Box 321 .835 First Street . New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ph:631-734-5123 Fx: 631-734-2642 www.northfork.com/legends . ^J Love Lane Acquisition Corporation MDERALEXPRESS Diane & Dennis Harkoff Legends 835 First Street - New Suffolk, NY 11956 April 22, 2005 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Harkoff: You have been renting, from month to month, space on the parcel of land known as 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 which is owned by Love Lane Acquisition Corporation. The area you rent is delineated on the attached Exhibit A. The rental space has been used by your establishment, Legend's, for customer parking and storage of trash and the rental payment has been four hundred dollars ($400.00) per month. Effective May,1, 2005 the rental will be $1,000.00 per month. The terms of the rental are specified in the attached Lease and Rider. The Lease Agreement is for a two year term. If you wish to continue to utilize the property, please sign and return the attached Leases and Riders with the required monies due, First Month's Rent and Security Deposit, by May 1, 2005. If an executed lease is not received by May 1, 2005, your use of the property will be terminated. Should you have any questions or need any further information, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-298-4739. Sincerely, - Mic ael Raynor MR jp Attachments - Michael Raynor 160 Inlet View East Matti=14 NY 11952 I, e • ' Dennis & Diane Harkoff — Fine Food, Spints &Sports May 13, 2002 • RESTAURANT Mr. Peter Harris Superintendent, Southold Town Highway Dpt. PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Parking on First Street,New Suffolk , Dear Mr. Harris: Currently, we rent parking space for Legends' customers on the east side of First Street from the Raynors (Love Lane Acquisitions). Street parking has always been allowed in New Suffolk,but after we opened up in 1993 some of the community was upset about cars being parked in the streets, too close to their driveways. They also were not pleased with the slightly haphazard way people tried to parallel park without the aid of curbs and painted lines to delineate the spaces. The Raynors offered us a parking area for our customers for what was originally-a nominal monthly rent,but one that has crept steadily upwards over the years. As you may be aware,the Raynor' s future expansion plan shows that our leased parking area will be abolished. Although nothing has been approved yet,the community has already started voicing their concerns about"Where are people going to park?"and"What are you going to do about it?", etc. . Well, we have ambivalent feelings about this whole parking saga. On the one hand, we absolutely relish the idea of not having to pay$400.00 a month for parking! On the other hand, our neighbors and our customers will be.upset with the helter.-skelter street parking that would ensue without a designated area, as they were when we first opened up in 1993. We would like to propose another idea, one that we think could be an amenable solution for both our neighbors and our customers, as well as for our pocketbook! Why couldn't the town make diagonal parking on that portion of our current parking area that is on town property? The severity of the angle could be determined depending how many feet of town property lies beyond the paved,road. Diagonal parking would certainly fit far more cars than parallel parking could offer and would certainly be more neat& organized looking. It might be a simple way-to resolve everyone's problem. Remember, "for every problem there's a solution". Your mission, should you choose to accept it(and I trust you will), is to help me find the solution! If for any reason you find that my idea is not feasible, please provide an alternative proposal. We would love to hear more about it. Sincerely, Diane Ha of 1 • 835 First Street• New Suffolk, New York 11956 •Tel: 631-734-5123 • Fax: 631-734-2642 www.northfork.com/legends ANTHONY C- 'M.A.TSON 440 3RI Sr1�:1?.El�� 1� PO:� 75 E C E NEW SUFFOLK NEW YORK lift Town *I�lhllqS2- ;F oft /11014"r - 776C kra vv�-.r�-rru.4� . q-k, �la IdG�f:v A 0&cl� U 4,0 igj HAQ I At NI-A 0-h ea eg-4-A AaAlr. 64-e akt, . .�, � Z .ate• ,� -�� �,. .�. aAJ- f'�C,2t.c.wc;2.Q I�.e �1 a,fit . �-��Sl� G:t�yce'''`�.`'y • ��d''�t. )e,�.,p� k�'`,'e' Vno (� auk o�iI�P a,(,� � aEt � - I� a� • 0,4 �- �i cJfiuce -tom. Q,r.Q fin. -Grp �'��L Qo • ' � . eta 14 a4/7 d C"�c.• auk d4Tjm a-U I n- ot-t M a Z -fir �� w� , �r�,c.�-2, �►�:2,�t,��,(1�.�-�. � 4�t "A "� ^ U roe j-c"� rV.44 � r14 Po. 149 �ll� •1 �ru�s��,.l.r-. Pry. . Southold own Board of Trustees ft)ojz - mom LLC If-gstee P-rzo i S 1L n -TCR3,m cock. (�Sar�.CCeS� ��s!RT.I, �o t O� ►cG�, Cco 5C�5�'(�5 �R.�Kr(15 cs�dryoA s , d ev e-AohmRhj n5 d aes-tte-- =ic S t�%x-,a-C+Qr (LeA c h OC94," «-d �`*%i- raw rcw rl ,n _ a-m o� rte s-f�-c.�1y..res VYN ru - la c cs uo erw e�- vends dose u -a mcVit' rornmeA� ze so Q_�(-un cuvvld adverse lR�e '�f 6 waL�{e.rs,bcsw� bo�bnc� end ' . -S-ks6 c h v;rn I els Vvsce . �1 ( on cs►r�2�.1�� ��� mho ot�.r �=r����e�c� tua�Cl� Cos�►ssL_�r7`�c�11�6►1� 1 a Q-&X- p�c�v ryn r1fl L - -JA �� April 18, 2005 Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay 117.-8-18 Y Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President D Board of Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 APR 19 2005 Dear Mr. Krupski and Board of Trustees: Scuthold Town Board of Trustees As Chairperson of the New Suffolk Hamlet Stakeholders, who recently reported to the Town Board, I ask that you include in your consideration of the Matt-a-Mar on the Bay boat rack proposal, and in your record, the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, the Summary of which is attached. _ Chief among the Stakeholders' recommendations for the New Suffolk waterfront property 117.-8-18 is enforcement of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, now Town law. Among its provisions pertaining to this property is the following: "Redevelopment action in this area should seek to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront and the continuance of water-dependent uses, BUT AT A SCALE APPROPRIATE TO THE COMMUNITY." And: "THE HIGH DEGREE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, NOT TO MENTION THE UNIQUE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE NEW SUFFOLK AREA, IN GENERAL, HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR CAREFUL AND LIMITED REDEVELOPMENT." The plan proposed by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay for boat racks 34' high for 153 boats and space for 185 parked automobiles does not constitute "careful and limited redevelopment." Such construction would overwhelm the hamlet center, destroy any semblance of historic ambience, block our scenic waterfront views, and create hazards for any pedestrians on the small site or on the adjacent street. The noise of the forklift running back and forth at all hours and the stench of fumes from motors and bilges would render the center of the hamlet offensive to residents and visitors alike, including patrons of a popular restaurant and gift shop. There has been no environmental cleanup of over 150 years of accumulation in the soil and in the bay bottom of hazardous and toxic materials. There must be a cleanup before a spade is turned for any purpose. A thorough and current environmental study is essential for any redevelopment plan, requiring a positive SEQRA declaration by the lead agency. For the Board's information, the Planning Board, which has Matt-a-Mar by the Bay's application pending, as of April 8, 2005 had 44 letters from New Suffolk residents opposing the boat rack plan, plus letters from the New Suffolk Civic Association and from the North Fork Environmental Council. Attached is a copy of the NFEC letter. Finally, please extend the hearing. No public notice is posted on the property as of this writing, at 3:00 pm April 18, 2005, nor has one been posted in the last several days, as I have repeatedly observed. This has deprived many residents, all of whom customarily go to the Post Office on Saturday mornings, many of them walking by the property, of knowledge of the proposal which so vitally affects their hamlet and therefore no opportunity to comment on it. Sincerely, oan B. Robbins 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk,NY 11956 Ab 64.5 NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL,, INC. Rt.25 at love Lane, PO Box 799,Mattituck, NY 11952 Tel.:631-298-8880 Fax:631-298-4649 nfec1Ooptonline.net www.nfecl.org March 15, 2005 Jerilyn Woodhouse,Chair Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold,New York Dear Madame Chairperson, The first condition of the Henry Raynor proposal for development of a boat-storage facility in New Suffolk is,of course, the most obviously bad for the community-the size. It is too large for the area in terms of numbers of boats, in terms of height, and in terms of area to be used. One must consider, for instance,the added height of the boats themselves atop the already built(legitimate)thirty-five feet. It is not NFCC's business to comment loudly on aesthetics. But we are concerned, in light of the size of the plan, about traffic and the quality of the air in that area of the hamlet. The Planning Board must estimate in some reasonable way the number of cars which may be present(there could be more than one car per boat) and at what times they are likely to be at the site. These estimates must keep in mind the cars in the area in which diners are using and how all of this traffic may commingle or create gridlock. What will this mean for the residents in the nearby area? The engines of the boats will also create pollution and noise. We are also wondering whether the boats will be serviced at this facility-which, if so, -would create more concerns. We have concerns about how the water might be contaminated with the various chemicals necessary for boat cleaning, repair, etc. Therewill be impact on the water simply because of the boats being launched there - particularly those with engines. The Planning Board must consider carefully whether the building of any of this facility will require actual disturbance of the bay bottom in that area. This question has come up before and we believe that it has been agreed that it is best not to disturb the bottom because of the probability of contaminants resting there (because of former uses there) getting moved through the water to unknown destinations. But the Planning Board should be certain of what might be part of the project. Another major concern is that, so far,there is nothing noted for space for a pump-out facility. Again, water contamination is our big worry. New Suffolk has been an important place for all of the long history of the North Fork of Long Island. We want to be certain that it may continue to be a healthy community for those living in and visiting it. Yours truly, i Schroeder Gwyn r I I Executive Director MAR 1 7 2005 a non-profit organization for the preservation o and,sea,alr and quallty of4 e___ printed on 0recycled paper New Suffoiiz Hamlet Study Summary (I . t .S•'�,`r;;, ti,.,a,:': s: .kir, ;i i ■ New Suffolk Hamlet Center, the traditional commercial core of the hamlet, includes 21 parcels encompassing 8.97 acres, within the original 1840's grid and the waterfront. ■ Largest land owner in the Hamlet Center is the Love Lane Realty Acquisition Corp. now known as Mat-A-Mar Marina on the Bay which owns a 3.25 acre waterfront parcel at the foot of Main Street. • There are no vacant parcels in the Hamlet Center. ■ A Town owned 1.25 acre public beach is located in the Hamlet Center. ■ 3 zoning districts regulate land in the Hamlet center, R-40, H B, and M-II. ■ 50% of the land uses in the Hamlet Center are single-family residences, 24% are Hamlet Marine commercial uses. Only 8% are traditional Hamlet commercial uses. • The Hamlet Center supports 18 buildings, 67% of which are in good condition. • The Hamlet Center has a total assessed value of $113,500, generating $65,353 in total tax revenue annually. t 2. Hamlet Vision TOWR of SOUTHOLD o STUDY NEW SUFFOLK Hamlet Center •:fit j:? fiAMLET IMAGE MAP ' � `' ' 1 ' y'�j�, 1•4yy IY�I1 artA11 C n '.tI�+Vi if.' Itl IFS Me1MY e! New Suffolk's Hamlet vision can be summarized as follows: • New Suffolk remains isolated from the rest of the Town by a band of wetlands, protected lands, and active farmland. The area within the protected band and the bay reflects a traditional development grid pattern, which it is essentially built out. ■ New Suffolk's grid supports a pattern of high density residential development (1/4 acre or greater). ■ New large-scale, high density development, is inappropriate in New Suffolk. • Limited opportunities for infill development do not exist in New Suffolk. The HALO zone should reflect the existing character of the hamlet and accommodate accessory apartments. ■ New Suffolk seeks to reestablish its historic maritime heritage by revitalizing the underutilized waterfront with water dependent and water enhanced uses, at a scale appropriate to the character of the hamlet of the present, not as it was 100 years ago. ■ New Suffolk's historic character is a vital aspect of the area's "sense of place" and should be reinforced. 2 i Town OP SOMOW HAMM TUD f R; 3§...;.., NEW t'l,'r :i��� iF"i:'i%'•_,..des.. %,. ai?'t �'•a -" '; rf.*•I I Iamkt(enter f A �-- BASE MRP t', - rYM.bwYr1 t i('iYh !•Uy l: • The Hamlet Center boundary was designed to reconnect the business district with the waterfront. • The Hamlet Center boundary runs along 2nd Street in the west, travels along the Town beach to the Bay in the south, follows the waterfront along the eastern boundary, and includes the waterfront property up to Orchard Street in the north, then south along 1st Street to King Street to its beginning at 2nd Street. , ft,-LC 3 TOWN OF • .s. ' ";'r, �A�. SOUiNOLD 012 ,:v + ;Cii2 M RAKLc+'T e ' STUDY r, raNnV `N. SUFFOLK y4� r7' -:r• :p�'rt� '�� IlnmktCenhx n � i �7,7. Ale HALO " ti0a 17y1 . . MAP �� ,� fir ����- ?-�, � :•� . ufu; , .c., �� .h�a ..1�,��� t,Wi1•';..' wia�ieuan .,r WIIW m • The proposed area of the HALO zone covers the entire developed portion of New Suffolk, outside of the Hamlet Center. The Western boundary corresponds to Grathwohl Road, the northern boundary is where Grathwohl Road and New Suffolk Road intersect. ■ The HALO zone is effectively, built out. Increased density for housing in New Suffolk should come from permits for second dwelling units. Such units can be either an apartment in a single-owner private dwelling or in a separate structure. Stakeholders defined the Hamlet's strengths and weaknesses and then determined how to address each. 6.^Hamlet cg5tain?4! 4 "Smart Growth" sustainability principles were developed for each basic component of the Hamlet; including: • Human Scale • Waterfront ■ Streetscape ■ Vehicular Circulation ■ Parking ■ Pedestrian Circulation Public Transportation Building Design • Infrastructure ■ Maintenance ■ Enterprise ■ Housing • Open Space Preservation ■ The Working Landscape ■ Historic Resources Utilizing the general categories established in #6 above, various specific project recommendations have been compiled: • Human Scale: The development of a community meeting house within the Hamlet Center is recommended to preserve the human scale of the hamlet, thereby avoiding the need to utilize the school, which is outside the Hamlet Center. ➢ Reconstruction of New Suffolk Post Office and adjoining or adjacent small general store, within the hamlet center. • Waterfront: ➢ Enforce consistency with the provisions of the LWRP. Revitalize the underutilized 3.25 acre parcel to support public/private uses, preserving public waterfront access and uses while accommodating marine related uses (such as small docking facility for transient boats and a small marine motor repair shop) and other small commercial uses (such as one-story construction for small shops and/or offices). Preserve the main viewscape'of the Bay in the hamlet center. Prohibit any building blocking Main Street. Preserve the opportunity to rebuild the Post Office and General Store. Rehabilitate the restaurant without major expansion. Prohibit rack boat storage and large boat storage buildings. .5 ➢ Designate mooring fields in Cutchogue Harbor. Provide for transient moorings. Provide pump-out facilities. Lengthen the Town boat ramp for safer accessibility. ➢ Control runoff from storm water and road containments to protect the Bay. Preserve waterfront habitats, including wetlands. Make public restrooms at Town Beach available beyond the customary season, that is end of June to Labor Day. Keep trash barrels at Town Beach year-round with regular pickup. ➢ Add more benches at Town Park. ■ Streetscape: Underground utility lines. On-going street tree planting program, including the replacement of damaged or dead trees. Maintain an unobstructed viewshed along streets to the water. High intensity lighting and neon lighting should be avoided. All lighting should be shielded and directed downward. The First Street streetscape should be enhanced with decorative -streedights, street furniture and a distinctive sidewalk (brick pavers :etc.). `Street trees should be planted in front of the present Post Office. • Vehicular Circulation: Install a stop sign at the east end of First Street and Main Street. Install a stop sign at Orchard and First Streets. Prohibit on-street parking along the east side of First Street between King and Orchard Streets. All streets that end at the water should be accessible to the waterfront for use by the residents of New Suffolk. Designate a truck route into the Hamlet Center (Main Street/First Street) and impose a weight limit for roadways not designated as a truck route. ➢ Modest traffic calming is recommended throughout the Hamlet. Evaluate all sight distance impediments at driveways and intersections and correct as required. ■ Parking: No additional parking lots. Prohibit on-street boat trailer parking. ➢ Create a one day permit for a car and trailer parking. 6 Provide parking either on the east side of First Street between King and Main Streets. ➢ Enforce parking regulations, especially at the bay ends of the streets. ■ Pedestrian Circulation: ➢ Existing sidewalks need to be repaired and maintained. Sidewalks and walkways should be limited to major roadways such as New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk Road, and Grathwohl Road. New sidewalks are not necessary on the smaller roadways. Striping intersection crosswalks in the Hamlet Center and at the school is recommended. This might be done in conjunction with curb narrowing as a traffic calming measure. ■ Public Transportation: ➢ A permanent bus stop is not necessary. Enhance Dial-a-ride. • Building Design: Eclectic mix of architecture adds to the charm of the Hamlet. Extend Architectural Review Board jurisdiction to include residential structures. • Infrastructure: Flooding is a major problem. The hamlet center is a flood plain. It is recognized that as a waterfront hamlet, periodic severe flooding will occur, however, it is imperative that routine flooding be controlled. Opportunities to control and detain stormwater upstream should be investigated. A flood hazard mitigation plan is needed, as stated in the LWRP. Puddling on roadways is also a nuisance and should be eliminated through drainage improvements. Underground utility lines. ■ Maintenance: ➢ Adequate garbage management at all business locations is needed. Buildup and leakage of restaurant cooking oil must be prevented. Excessive dust and sand on roadways needs to be cleaned regularly. Excessive noise from businesses impacts the surrounding residential neighborhood and should be controlled through a noise ordinance. ■ Enterprise: The Hamlet Center should support modest and limited business activity. Large scale commercial activity would be inconsistent and inappropriate. ➢ Exclude "hotels"from the list of permitted uses in the Hamlet. ■ Housing: Change zoning code to allow enhanced density in the HALO zone, specifically second dwelling units on eligible parcels. ➢ Allow second unit as an apartment in a principal dwelling, or separate building Define eligible parcels as those above 1/4 or 1/2 acre, served by public water. Over 100 such parcels are evenly dispersed throughout New Suffolk. Limit size of second dwelling, in the range of 850-1250 square feet. ➢ Support affordable program with property tax policy: as long as program guidelines are followed, exempt or reduce property tax on second unit. ➢ Second dwellings on residential parcels could also help preserve open space. Allow owner of a qualified parcel to purchase a development right from town DR holding agency: entitles him/her to construct habitable "guest house." Tax guest houses, and apply proceeds to affordable housing or open space preservation programs. • Open Space Preservation: Highest priority is given to the ballfield and Town beach and park. The long term preservation of these facilities must be assured. Improvements to existing public access areas to the waterfront is a goal. ■ The Working Landscape: ➢ Appropriately scaled traditional maritime businesses should be encouraged. Large scale facilities would not be consistent with the character of the Hamlet. Exclude "food processing" from the list of permitted uses in the M-II district. ■ Historic Resources: ➢ Designate the entire HALO zone as a historic district. There are 48 New Suffolk structures, past and present, on the SPLIA list. Three properties, including the present School House, are in the National Historical Register. Several large historic trees warrant special designation and protection. Preserve historic barn on the 3.25 acre waterfront parcel. It is the sole remaining historic building on the property and is on the SPLIA list. ➢ Regulate construction within district per approved guidelines, including architectural review for commercial residential structures. R Jerry&Cali Schultheis PO Box 299, 1640 First Street New Suffolk, NY 11956-0299 631-734-7265 schu127(@attg1oba 1.net April 15,2005 C Mr Al 1 ! Chairman ki APR 1 $ 2005 J Southold Board of Trustees Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 southold Town Southold, NY 11971 Board of Trustees Dear Mr. Krupski: As residents of New Suffolk we would like to take this opportunity to address the upcoming issue of the request to build boat storage racks at the Matt-a-Mar on the Bay Marina in New Suffolk The concept of building such a large structure is completely out of character for New Suffolk as well as for the entire Town of Southold. It is contrary to the goals set for New Suffolk in the recent Hamlet Study done by the New Suffolk Stakeholders and presented to the Town Board. The existing boat racks already in the town are blight on the landscape and block the scenic waterfront vistas throughout the entire town. Unfortunately boat racks themselves are not specifically addressed in the allowable uses in both the MI & MII zones in the town. Since they are not addressed as a specific allowable use they should be banned. The entire North Fork along the Route 25 corridor has been designated to be a protected scenic vista. The racks are not a beauty to behold. The proliferation of the unsightly boat racks should not happen in New Suffolk or in the entire Town of Southold. We are under the impression that a public hearing on this manner will be held on Wednesday April 2&It is our understanding that under Chapter 58 of the Town Code it is required for the applicant to erect a sign provided by the Town that shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which abuts the property involved which states the time and place of the hearing and must be displayed not less than 7 days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. On Thursday April 14, 2005 at 4.30 PM there was no such sign displayed thereby disallowing the hearing scheduled for April 2(P When the Town adopted the new Chapter 97 of the Town Code in early 2004 there was a prelude which addressed the goals of the new code.The new code referred to the following: 1)"rich heritage of scenic, historic and natural resources", 2) "Protection of the environment', 3) reference that Town waters and habitats have been negatively impacted,4)docks"have some effect on physical, biological, ecosystem functions and values, development patterns and the aesthetic character of the neighborhood" and "that new growth in the form of new structures on existing water front lots and underwater lands pose a similar potential to impair the Town's unique environment, geology and hydrology". Clearly if the Trustees believe in the new code they created this project can not be allowed. The tax parcel in question has significant historical value which will be destroyed if the racks are constructed. The parcel contains the following historic sites from the Town of Southold SPLIA list: Houston's Barn (which will be destroyed), the original Galley Ho restaurant, the site of the Post Office and the site of the first submarine base in the country.All of this history will be lost forever The proposed racks will handle up to a 15,800 pound boat. A boat that size combined with the weight of the fork lift to carry it will ruin the east end of Main Street which will have to be crossed in order to get to the southern section of the property. One only has to observe the operation of a large forklift carrying a large boat to see the ground deflect under the massive weight The weight will destroy the road. It does not seem possible that travel across the town road can be avoided to access the entire property. • Page 2 April 15,2005 The bilge of a boat collects an interesting mixture of sea water, engine oil, transmission fluid, anti- freeze, and battery acid. Normally when a boat is removed from the water by the fork lift the hull drain plug is removed to prevent the hull from collecting rain water. The cocktail of toxic fluids within the hull will drip out of the boat as it is moved between the water and the rack. This toxic cocktail will also drip on the ground under where the boat is stored, all over the cars parked under the boats and when the cars leave additional toxic material will be spread all over New Suffolk. There will be hazardous materials present contrary to the statement in the application to the Planning Board. The fork lift will be large to handle a 15,800 pound boat and it will create constant loud noise and noxious diesel fumes as it traverses the marina all day long 7 days a week. Again contrary to the statement in the application to the Planning Board that the noise generated will not exceed the ambient noise there will be excessive noise for more than one hour per day. Odors from the fork lift engine and garbage generated will be produced for more than one hour per day again contrary to the statement in the application. A total of 153 boats and 185 vehicles will add significant traffic to the area contrary to the statement in the application. The loss of parking for Legends plus the additional parking for the marina will choke the entire area with vehicles. Parking and congestion in the hamlet will be a nightmare. It is bad enough that existing town streets are used for private commercial uses instead of parking and are even illuminated with a streetlight provided by the town at the east end of King Street right next to the proposed project. The boat traffic from 153 boats will overwhelm the mooring capacity of the cove at Robbins Island. Increased landings on the delicate sand spit will destroy the bird population which nests there. The quality of the bay will be compromised. The idyllic character of New Suffolk will be lost forever There is no provision for how the solid and liquid waste from the boats, boaters, workers, restaurant patrons, etc. will be accommodated. The application states that no sanitary or water will be required. The issue of what to do with human waste from the people who use the facility as well as a pump out facility for the boats has not been addressed. The site has a reputation for being saturated with toxic materials yet the application says the site has not been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes. The application claims the proposed use is compatible with the adjoining/surrounding land uses within %mile. Our recollection of the zoning map as it existed on the wall in town hall before the move to the annex showed this site to be zoned MII and the surrounding area to be MI or residential. The new zoning map in the town hall annex does not agree with the original that was in town hall. When were the boundaries of MII expanded? The height of the racks with boats on them will ruin the scenic views from the Hamlet Center. In the winter the sound generated by the wind blowing the shrink wrap on the boats will be a serious distraction for the entire surrounding area and a constant source of noise. In summary the proposed project is out of character with the area and should not be allowed. Furthermore the Town should begin the process of banning all future boat storage racks that destroy the scenic views of the waterfront in the entire town. In summary the reasons for rejecting this application include the following: 1) Out of character for New Suffolk 2) Not consistent with goals of stakeholder Hamlet Study 3) Will ruin the scenic vistas 4) The signage for the hearing was not posted as required by Town Code 5) The entire project is contrary to the goals and objectives to the new Chapter 97 of the Town Code 6) History and Historical Structures will be destroyed • Page 3 April 15,2005 7) The downtown infrastructure will be destroyed 8) The harmful effect on the environment 9) Increased parking and traffic inconsistent with the rural existing character 10) Disruption of idyllic character of New Suffolk 11) Lack of waste disposal facilities 12) Remediation of existing toxic conditions S' cerely, Jerry&Cali Schultheis April 14,2005 t c Mr. James A. Baker III U V 1600 Grathwohl Road, P 0 Box 9 New Suffolk, NY 11956 i APR 1 8` 2005 April 18, 2005 _. Mr Albert J. Krupski, President i Southold Town Board of Town Trustees Board of Trustees P 0. Box 1179 f Southold, NY 11971 Reference: Planned"Matt-a-Mar-by-the-Bay" Marina Project in New Suffolk Dear Mr. Krupski, I'm writing you today to express my concerns over the referenced planned"boat storage rack" project in the boat basin area at the end of Main St., (sometimes referred to as New Suffolk Ave.) in the hamlet of New Suffolk. I believe this project will adversely affect the wetlands and the people of the Town of ' Southold in the following ways that are within the jurisdiction of the Town Trustees: 1 Damage from erosion, turbidity, and siltation. Both during construction and throughout the operation of this project, storm water runoff will be a major issue because of the project's intimate location on the shoreline. In spite of protective measures that may be taken during construction, unless significant engineering controls are put in place and continuous oversight provided, each rainstorm will create storm water discharges, causing erosion and carrying silt and surface pollutants from drips, spills, etc. into the bay. Then, during the operation of this project, runoff from paved surfaces will occur during each rainfall event, transporting sand, silt, and surface pollutants into the bay. 2. Adverse effects on fish, shellfish, etc. During the life of this project, pollution from spills of fuels, oils, solvents, paints, etc. will occur on the property and will create surface pollution that will ultimately be transported into the bay as described above. In addition, major spills will occur, although less frequently, and these will cause subsurface soil and ground water pollution, which will find its way into the bay, due to the project's location immediately on the shoreline. An indirect impact of this project will occur on neighboring Schoolhouse Creek, where the closest source of marine fuel is located.* Because no fueling facility is planned at the project's location, the boats from this project will undoubtedly obtain their fuel from the New Suffolk Marina, located on nearby Schoolhouse Creek. Not only will pollution potential from spilled and leaked fuel occur, but navigation issues will certainly arise, as the number of vessels using this narrow, shallow waterway double in number. 3. Health and Safety. Finally, the increase in vehicular traffic generated by this project through the Hamlet of New Suffolk will create numerous health and safety issues as both customers' and suppliers' vehicles transit this quiet residential community on their way to and from the project location. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. In my letter to the Town Planning Board(copy attached), I outlined many other environmental, public health and safety issues about this project that you may also want to consider during your review. I am a year-round resident of New Suffolk and an environmental professional with over thirty years of experience and I would be happy to discuss the impacts of this'project with you at any time. Please feel free to contact me at(631)734-5121. Sincerel , Jam Z4 (Jim).Baker I11 Atch: My March 7, 2005 letter to Planning Board Cc: New Suffolk Civic Association w/o atch Mr. James A. Baker III 1600 Grathwohl Road, P.O. Box 9 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 7, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairman Southold Town Planning'Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Reference: Planned "Matt-a-Mar-by-the-Bay" Marina Project in New Suffolk Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I - I'm writing you today to express my concerns over the referenced planned "boat storage rack" project in the boat basin area at the end of Main St., (sometimes referred to as New Suffolk Ave.) in the hamlet of New Suffolk. My primary concerns are the visual impacts of this project,, the problems that will arise from the increase in traffic generated by this new marina operation, and the potential for pollution from the operation of this facility. I believe this project is fundamentally incompatible with the character and nature of present-day New Suffolk, and it certainly does not fit in with my vision of how the development of our hamlet should evolve, a vision that I share with the majority, of New Suffolk residents with whom I've spoken. BACKGROUND, SETTING, CURRENT SITUATION Our hamlet is primarily a residential community, with several small businesses interspersed among neighborhoods of single family homes. The adverse impacts (e.g. visual, traffic, pollution, noise) of the existing businesses are relatively small and are spread out over the area of the hamlet. The facilities proposed by this project will forever change the character of our hamlet's downtown and waterfront areas and will introduce an unacceptable level of vehicle congestion into our relatively quiet hamlet. I loosely define the downtown area of the hamlet, where this project is proposed to be located, as the entire length of First Street, running from Orchard Street on the north, to the Town Beach, on the south. The,existing businesses in this area are located in several old, functional, one- and two- story buildings. There are residences located in between most of the commercial buildings. The streets in this area are narrow and the sidewalks, where they exist, are not in a good state-of repair. The largest year-round business in the area is the restaurant "Legends" and it currently generates the most adverse impacts in the area, primarily in the form of traffic, parking, and occasionally, noise. In summer, the.activities at the town beach and boat-launching ramp generate significant traffic congestion in the area. The existing marina and fishing station activities, although relatively small, further exacerbate this seasonal congestion.. ISSUES First, and foremost, this project is architecturally incompatible with,our hamlet's downtown area. Its large warehouse-like boat rack structures will give the appearance of a factory, which is completely out of character with the look and feel of the existing buildings. In addition, the parking lot necessary to support.this business will cover a significant portion of the downtown area. , As' . a result of this project, the views of Cutchogue Harbor, Robins Island, and Peconic Bay, which define this community, will be almost completely;blocked, and when seen, these visual elements will be marred by parked cars and industrial-looking buildings. Some residents living along First Street'will lose their waterfront views and all residents will be faced with an unpleasant scene of steel framework and parked vehicles. Residential property values will certainly decrease as a result. Although I recognize that current zoning does allow for the combination of residential and commercial functions in portions of this area, I don't necessarily,agree with this. Secondly, the nature and size of the proposed project will make it a significant generator of vehicular traffic. The customers of this facility will be arriving from the west,-along New Suffolk Avenue, and from the north, using New Suffolk Road. Both of these narrow, two-lane country roads are in a relatively poor state of repair. The traffic from both these routes must drive through the hearts of New Suffolk's residential neighborhoods on their way to the,proposed expanded marina. The Town of Southold is already addressing traffic density and excessive speed problems within our hamlet. I understand that the parking area acrossfrom the restaurant "Legends" will be eliminated by this project. Parking is already a year-round issue in this area, due to the popularity of this business. During busy times, parked vehicles spill over into the streets (and frequently, the front lawns) of adjacent neighborhoods. If this is a problem with the current parking configuration, it will become a nightmare if these parking spaces are removed. Daily„congestion would become the norm in this area from noon until midnight and in summer, the risk of vehicle-pedestrian accidents will significantly increase. Given the size of this project, the traffic from marina users, employees;.and delivery trucks will approximately triple in volume during the peak three to four months of its operating season. This latter category of vehicles brings with it an entirely new set of issues -- safety, health, and environment. Hazardous materials (HAZMAT) such as.fuel, lubricants, solvents, paints, and battery acid, to name a few, will be transported through our residential neighborhoods in increased volumes. An accident with a HAZMAT carrying vehicle puts our residents at risk of injury from a direct exposure and also creates the potential 2 1 of long-term neighborhood pollution from a HAZMAT spill. In addition, this industrial operation will generate hazardous wastes, which must be transported out of the area through these same neighborhoods. The issues I've discussed so far are mostly acute in nature, but the operation of a large boat-rack marina would create many chronic problems, such as noise, environmental pollution, and natural resource damages. Storriiwater runoff from the paved areas would introduce sediments, petroleum products,. and trash into the fragile coastal, marine environment and would also create localized erosion. Bone fish and shellfish resources are already declining in Peconic Bay due to man-made activities and this project will surely contribute to the further demise of these valuable commercial and recreational resources. Maintenance activities on the marina's equipment, as well as on customers' boats would mean handling large volumes of the HAZMATs listed above, carrying with it the risk of spills and unauthorized dumping. Recreational boating activities generate large volumes of trash, as users return from a day's boating with food packaging and drink containers. Even if everyone responsibly used on-site refuse containers, there would be an increased volume of.trash-hauling truck traffic through our. neighborhoods. The sanitary sewage from both, customers and employees must be properly disposed and given this project's waterfront location, it is doubtful that an adequate septic and leaching field system could be constructed to meet current health codes. If a holding tank system is the solution, then further increases in heavy truck traffic would occur, along with the risk of spills. Finally, the increased boat traffic on the Great Peconic Bay will not only adversely affect the fragile coastal marine environment, it will also contribute to the boating safety issues in this already crowded marine recreational-area. RECOMMENDATIONS Given this property is legitimately zoned for business, it would be foolish for me to believe nothing at all should be done with it. In considering a way forward, however, any proposed commercial development must be done in a sensitive and limited way, taking into account the needs of the hamlet of New Suffolk and its residents. This means.that only lean, esthetically pleasing designs should be accepted for approval, instead of those that simply,try to maximize the profit from every square foot of the property. In the long term, to accomplish this', the Town of Southold should approach- hamlet waterfront development in much the same way as farmland preservation, even to the point of purchasing some or all of the development rights of this precious resource. I believe the citizens of this town would be willing to pay for the preservation of the nautical character of their community, 3 instead of giving it over to unconstrained development. Hamlets such as New Suffolk should be able to ultimately decide what type and level of development is appropriate for their own waterfronts. In the short term, until such a hamlet waterfront preservation program can be established, you should not approve this referenced project in its current configuration, because: 1) it will adversely impact the quality of life of the residents of the hamlet of New Suffolk, and 2) it will change forever the character of New Suffolk from a quiet, historical, maritime community into an industrial park.. If the proponent wishes to revise their approach, then they should receive guidance as to how to approach such a project in this area-. . By way of closing, I'd like you to know that I grew up here (Southold High School, Class of 1964) and have recently returned to the North Fork after a thirty-year career with the military. Although,officially "retired," I know I can make a contribution to my hometown, using the knowledge I've gained from a career as an environmental professional. Although I'm not surprised at the amount-of development I've seen since I left, I am disappointed in the direction some of this development has taken. I believe I can help residents, developers, and'local governments see the long- term implications of their proposed decisions, through the eyes of someone who both loves his local community and has the training and experience to evaluate the engineering,and environmental impacts and provide workable, mutually- acceptable, compromise solutions. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. Please feel,free to contact me at (631) 734-5121 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, James A. (Jim) Baker III ' I Cc: New Suffolk Civic Association 4 - Albert J. Krupski Jr. President Board of Town Trustees P0Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 April 16, 2005 Dear Mr. Krupski: The following are our concerns regarding Matt-a Mar's request for changes at New Suffolk's marina. Please take our request that the hearing of April 20 be extended (kept open). Our waterfront is in danger. 1) impact on the bay and bay bottom of adding 153 boats to the water traffic; 2) the discharge on the water and on the land of toxic fluids from these boats as they are forklifted from the water; 3) the addition to the land and water from contaminants associated with maintenance of this number of boats; 4) lack of any environmental cleanup of the site,which contains 160 years of toxic substances (coal, oil, kerosene, fuel oil, gasoline, lead, copper,and more); 5) the volume of human waste and garbage from the boats on the water and the boaters on the land at a site with no pump-out station and no sanitary facilities; 6) obliteration of the hamlet's scenic waterfront viewscape; 7) danger to the public from use of the forklift and from the volume of automobiles for those frequenting the restaurants, both on and off the site, and for the pedestrian residents using the adjacent street; 8) no room for additional moorings in Cutchogue Harbor. Your help is needed immediately. Thank you, ` Elayne and Fred Suesser APR 18 2005 5055-New Suffolk Rd. New Suffolk, NY Southold Town Board of Trustees Albert J Krupski, Jr,. President Board of trustees i P...O.._ Box. 1179 Southlold NY 11971 Dear Mr.- Kr•upski, My husband and I. have been residents of New Suffolk for. over 32 years. We are convinced that our hamlet is one of the most beautiful places in the entire world. At a time where we have to be vigilant over so much destruction of our beautiful land, the marina waterfront project on First Street is of great concern- to us for the following reasons : 1.This project is too large involving too many boats and too many cars for such a small area. The impact on the bay and the adjacent land would be disastrous. 2.The quality of the water in the bay would be affected and a great risk for our children and all the people using the New Suffolk beach. More and more, our public beach attracts people from many towns around and the parking is already a major issue. 3.The racks are too high and would destroy the neighborhood. 4.Where would the patrons of the restaurant Legends park their cars and this. narrow part of New. Suffolk would be "suffocating" with parking and heavy traffic on Main street, which is a dead end street ! 5.The proposed landscape seems very insufficient for such a beautiful area. S.It seems that the plans show no accommodation for rest rooms for boat owners and. no pump-out. How could we cope with the volume. of human waste from the boaters and toxic waste from the boats ? There are families with children swimming and enjoying the Public Beach a few feet away... 7. Our hamlet is primarily residential. The noise from the handling of the boats and the noise from the traffic would destroy New Suffolk' s quality of life This is a crucial time for the North Fork. It is time for our Town Board and our Board of Trustees to be extremely vigilant and prevent man made disasters that would have such a destructive impact on our environment, and our historical village. New Suffolk is so much part of the History of the North Fork. We trust our Town Board and our Board of. Trustees to make sure that the right thing is done for the Hamlet. Respectfully, Michelle Roussan E C E D ; Matei Roussan. M.D. Apn 9 �n� > 11 05 17 APR 19 2005 i D' a—v— th wn rp s Board of Trustees w e h 1 rYlDvecl- ct,t I r�TO New go K. M a we-e daT �ere i n the S(,t.M'n'le`r�<{�e�or�eocti� I � ov eCoh�trccc�ion oT 4�-ts srn¢' I ?Gwn . e�Ort� l� wo�vt� To G F SISte-Y' S 'UirkAoy keaetl iUl 41\, CD� 'frc.cc+ion, wi+k �l -ice +k �JeG�uTi �G � s�c�rs . W it� cxl I �ih� YYs(s� on S�wva0.y +k , s ., C .IJy-1--4 be 2bfe i(n C-�V-c1. 0 � S�day n�91,ts, Ise all -F eFfecf y ed � asTc�e_in� ave 2A Ccire qK� � v� o,Yb nes Clv� had th � TLe Si✓�C2Y'�J,� � Steve and Mary Anne Katsoulas D E C E � V E 117 First Street,New Suffolk,NY 11956 631.734-7297 Sunday,April 17, 2005 APA 2005 f -.1 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees Sout,io!d Tov n P.O. Box 1179 Board of Trustees Southold,NY 11971 Re: Matt-a Mar Marina,New Suffolk Dear .Mr. Krupski, We are residents of First Street,New Suffolk. We are looking forward to our soon to be permanent status. I, as a summer resident since 1963, fully recognize the beauty and the change's that have taken place in New Suffolk over time. We feel a large boat storage facility of this size is not appropriate for the proposed site, for the following reasons. 1) The number of boats into the harbor and bay would surely have a negative impact on the slow recovery of the bay, due to the toxin and contaminants associated with such an operation. 2) The proposed site is already in need of environmental cleanup. 3) There are no sanitary facilities. This would be a disaster for the surrounding areas. 4) We, as very nearby neighbors, would find a structure of this type and size to be unsightly and.unacceptable. 5) Very significant changes to pedestrian traffic patterns would have to be made. As of,present, residents•lpisurely stroll children along First..Streetand Main Street on their way to the Town,Beach;„This would-become;hazardous;n6t only,.to-parents and children, but to the many bicyclist that follow the North Fork bike path. The danger comes not only.from the large amount of cars coming and going, but the large, heavy equipment,needed in moving and,launching boats on a daily basis. 6) The parking in the area has reached peak levels at this point. Any additional parkingneeds would have a severe impact on ALL,surrounding:areas.- Thank you-f6r your time and consideration, Sincerely, Mary e Katsoulas , C ----1 i April 19, 2005 D Mr. Albert J. Krupski;Jr., President APR 1 0 2005 Board of Town Trustees P. O. Box 1-179 -- Southold TomLl Southold, NY 11971 Board of Trustees I am writing to express.my concerns about the building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay at the foot of Main Street, New Suffolk. The proposed project is of too massive-a scale for the New Suffolk downtown and would-entirely change the character of our small and intimate community. One of -the, most important assets that New Suffolk has is the waterfront and the bay beaches,_ The_environmental_impact_on the quality of the bay and.the bay bottom from adding 153 boats is a serious concern. The discharge of .toxic material from these boats into the water and on the surrounding land as they are fork lifted from the water each day will quickly addup and destroy the water quality and associated ecosystem. As those of us who live in New Suffolk know, the proposed site is within the flood_plain, so. any contaminants that are deposited on the land will wash into the bay with- each good Northeaster. These will be contaminants associated with the maintenance of these boats on a-sitewith no pump out facilities and-no sanitary.facilities. I would also assume that the footings required to support 3 levels of heavy boats,would have-to go fairly deep into the ground to be strong enough to survive our storms and flooding and thus expose some the toxic substances that have built up in the ground over the last 160 years. I believe that a full environmental cleanup would be required on the site, before any project can-proceed. If this project is allowed to proceed, I am fairly confident that we will see `NO SWIMMING DUE TO POLLUTION RUNOFF' signs posted on the New Suffolk Town beach in our lifetime. We are the stewards of this beautiful area and the Board of Trustees is our voice-to see that this ecosystem-is-protected. With the proposed height of the boat racks being the equivalent of a 3 and a half story building, these racks would now be the predominant feature of our historic downtown area. Instead of enjoying the water view,we would look at massive white plastic sheeting. I would also assume that our Town Beach at the foot of first street would become crowded with many non-Southold residents since the Matt-a-Mar parking spaces are adjoining the beach parking area. I would ask the Board of Town Trustees to please work closely with the concerned citizens of New Suffolk and the New Suffolk Civic Association to arrive at compromise more suited to the location. Sincerely, Patricia-E. McIntyre P.O. Box 632 1970 Grathwohl Rd New-Suffolk, NY-1-1-956- Albert J. Krupski, Jr., PresidentD E C E � VE Board Of Town Trustees Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 APR 1 9 2005 Southold,NY 11971 Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Mr. Krupski and Board of Town Trustees, My husband and I live in New Suffolk and have owned a home on the corner of Main and 2nd Streets for 14 years. We purchased our home because we love the charm and community spirit of the hamlet. The people of New Suffolk are very aware of our bay and the impact that our lifestyle has on its fragile ecosystem. We are also very proud of the historic value of New Suffolk. We are extremely concerned regarding the proposed Matt-a-Mar on the Bay Marina. New Suffolk is a small community and the proposed marina disregards the fragility of the surrounding waters and the history of the hamlet of New Suffolk. We hate to imagine what 17 metal structures, 34 feet high, built at the waters edge of this small community would do to vilify the beauty of our hamlet. We are appalled at the total lack of foresight and regard for community that the Matt-a-Mar proposal allows. This plan has no accommodations for rest rooms for boat owners or pump out facilities. We fear the destructive impact on the pristine waters of the bay with that many boats discharging waste and fuel. Putting in tall metal boat rack structures will completely alter and destroy the views particularly along First Street. What an eyesore! Demolishing an historic barn in order to place ugly metal structures is thoughtless. The racks are too high,the number of boats and the lack of parking are all unacceptable as the plan now appears. We hope to replace our historic General Store/Post Office building on it's original site. This Marina plan prevents that. Simply put, this project is without thought or regard for lifestyle of a small historic hamlet. Main Street and the surrounding streets are already under traffic stress because of a very popular restaurant/bar: Legends.New Suffolk also has a public beach area that adds a parking nightmare for the local residents who have to deal with ongoing illegal parking during the summer season. As it appears now,this proposed marina project will create absolute chaos for the existing peaceful, charming and historic village already pushed to the limits of patience with traffic issues and our concern for the bay and the wildlife who depend on the bay for survival. The proposal of the marina as it now stands is so incredibly unacceptable that we will not tolerate it being regarded as anything other than folly. This is a ridiculous idea for New Suffolk. As a New Suffolk homeowner and Southold taxpayer we are asking you to take a critical and compassionate view of the impact the proposed marina will have on the environment of New Suffolk and its residents. Please keep us informed of town meetings and any developments regarding this project as we will appreciate opportunities to share our concerns. The idea of obliterating the views in our hamlet and the impact on the bay for profit are so appalling that we are willing to do whatever is necessary to force Matt-a-Mar to accept responsibility to the environment and to the community. We hope that Matt-a-Mar will look more closely at who and what will be impacted by this proposed plan. As it stands it is unacceptable. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. A. D. Uterano 17095 Main Street PO Box 435 New Suffolk,NY 11956 BRIAN A. ANDREWS, ESQ. 235 WICKS ROAD,P.O. BOX 207 NEW SUFFOLK,NEW YORK 11956 April 18, 2005 DIF, E U 1 . Albert J. Krupski, Jr.,'President i APR 1 9 2005 Southold Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Beard of Trustees Re: Application of Mat-A-Mar Marina for erection of.boat racks in New Suffolk Dear Mr. Krupski: I have been informed that the Board of Trustees will be conducting a hearing on the above referenced project inasmuch as it directly affects the wetlands and tidal waters in Cutchogue Harbor. I write to advise the Board of my concerns regarding this proposed project. Firstly, there is no doubt that the addition of boat racks will greatly intensify the use of the water adjacent to New Suffolk. Accordingly, if this project is permitted to proceed, there will be a proportionate increase in the volume of human waste and-garbage for the additional boats. As far as I am aware, the nearest pump-out facility is located at New Suffolk Shipyard situated at nearby Schoolhouse Creek. Thus, even if the additional boats were,to comply with the applicable sanitary regulations, there would be a huge increase in boat traffic on Schoolhouse Creek and an overwhelming demand upon the existing pump-out facility. In addition, the proposed plan does not include additional sanitary facilities on land. All in all the plan fails to take into consideration even the most immediate sanitation problem it is likely to cause. What is more; there is no fueling facility at this site which would also lead to overwhelming demand and traffic at other nearby fueling facilities. In addition, the plan does not address the existing environmental problems at the site including the removal of ancient underground fuel tanks which I have been informed are buried there. Finally, the erection of the proposed boat racks would cause harm to New Suffolk's historic and scenic waterfront In light of the foregoing,-it is hereby requested that the Southold Town Trustees deny this application for the erection of boat racks in New Suffolk. Respectfully submitted, C� Brian A. Andrews `�-•-�•-' - --- -- - r _ ! 1.Pig- O i 1'[-- . APR1-9 2005,-,; , Southold Town —— Board-of-Trustees 8-e 7 Q_ � Cl April 17, 2005 TO: Mr. Albert J. Krupski,Jr. ,President Board. of Town Trustees Southold, N.Y. 11971 From: Mr. & Mrs. Oreste B. Pesci 300 George Road New Suffolk,N.Y. 11956 Dear Sir: As residents and owners of a 'onefamily dwelling located in the Hamlet of New Suffolk,N.Y. We resent the recent changes that have been made and. also being contemplated in our small Hamlet.. We are against the interference and changes of tidal waters and wetlands against Mother Nature. This interference can be caused by additional boats in the area etc. . The proposed contruction, wodId cause a, change in Hamlet' s scenic waterfront. Please, ask the Board of Town Trustees to Vote, DOWN, this request. Sincerely Your , Francs Pesc' D Cod d to B.Pesci APR 19 20 300 George Road 05 New Suffolk,N..Y. 11956 Lucille Field Goodman PO Box 639 New Suffolk, NY 11956 April 19, 2005 Albert J. Krupski,Jr., President Board of Town Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Trustees: I am a concerned resident of New Suffolk residing at 315 Fourth Street. I am one of many who believe that the impact on the Bay and its bottom by adding 153 boats to the water traffic would be devastating. Here are some of my fears: the discharge in the water and on the land of toxic fluids from said boats would be huge as they are forklifted from the water; the addition of contaminants to land and water from said boats from their maintenance and upkieep would be heavy; the lack of any environmental cleanup of the site, which contains one hundred and sixty years of toxic substances such as coal„ oil, kerosene,fuel oil. Gasoline, lead, copper, etc., would be terribly destructive; the volume of human waste and garbage from the boats on the water and boaters on the land at a site with no pump-out station and no sanitary facilities would be disgusting and dangerous to health. From the point of aesthetics, the obliteration of the hamlet's scenic waterfront viewscape would be cruel and obscene. Come to New Suffolk and see for yourself. And how about the danger to the public from use of the forklift, and from the volume of automobiles for those frequenting the restaurants on and off the site? And what about the pedestrians and the many children using the streets and the public beach? Why should we put them in harm's way after decades of people feeling safe in this idyllic hamlet? Why?I hope good sense and concerns for the welfare of 711 and minds. It's up to youD Earnestly yours, APR 1 9 Southold ToBoard of Trust April 18,2005 Albert J. Krupski,Jr. President, Board of Trustees Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Al, I can't imagine Matt-A- Mar expects approval of their application to add racks for storage of 153 boats on First Street in New Suffolk. First of all,they know as well as we all do,that no determination has ever been made of the extent of the environmental cleanup required before the land can be disturbed. Any new use of it prior to cleanup risks further contamination of the Bay. Contamination occurred from the 1840's thru the 1980's when the North Fork Shipyard was sold. Storage of this many boats on the site at this time will further add to pollution as they will be maintained on site as well. The boat owners will have no pump-out station and no sanitary facilities, further adding to the risk of pollution. Knowing what we do now in 2005 about the fragile health of the Peconic Bay system, and of the likely causes of further degradation, it should be obvious that this application cannot be approved. Yes, I think we should continue a marine use of this property,but only on a scale that is appropriate to its circumstances. It may be that the market value of this property has' become unrealistic given the uses to which it can reasonably be put. But an owner's need to make good on his investment must be'subordinate to the environmental health of the surrounding waters on which so many people rely. I hope that you will determine that the Matt-A-Mar application should be turned down. Thank you for your consideration of my thoughts on this matter. Yo truly iewA. Mc Kay Main Street uffolk DE � � o APR l 9 2005 S'"'Wld Boar Tows - d of Trustees New Suffolk,Monday, April 18,2005 Att: Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear board members, As a resident of New Suffolk,I find it appalling that a monstrous project like the one proposed by Mat-a-mar should even be considered. First of all: New Suffolk harbor is one of the most beautiful bay sites left on the whole North Fork. Who would want to waste a gem like that for industrial use?And aren't the bay waters, which produced an abundance of oysters and scallops not so long ago, overused already? We don't need more boats and pollution and traffic, we need recreation space to enjoy the beauty of a unique piece of nature. Don't let anybody destroy another piece of this paradise called North Fork. Sincerely, Garance and Walter Werthmuller 1 5 APR-1-9 2005 Southold Town ---gb o rus ees APR 1 9 2005 v saun�ola Town Board of Trustees P.O. Box 286 New Suffolk April 18, 2005 Albert J. Krupski Jr. President Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Mr. Krupski and Trustees, I am writing to you with some of my concerns regarding the proposed project called Matt-a-Mar on the bay. The amount of traffic that will be generated by the users of one hundred and fifty or more boats will be absolutely intolerable. The area already suffers with parking problems from the overflow from the town beach and launching ramp. The bay is already sorely abused by boaters that raft up in front of Robins Island and throw their garbage over board. I have seen some of the debris brought up in scallop dredges in the fall of 2004 that consisted of cans, bottles and all manner of containers. I am sure that if they have so little regard for our bay that it would not be too much of a stretch of the imagination to assume that they are pumping their heads overboard also. Any excavation of this site would disturb pollutants that are already in the ground at this site. As a teenager I worked for what was then, the North Fork Shipyard and on many occasions,through ignorance of the potential hazards, dumped paint thinners, solvents used to clean motors, contaminated motor oil and other liquid waste into the ground in many areas of this site. I am sure the owners of this property would like to reap as large a profit from as small an investment as they can, but hope that they have enough regard for our hamlet and the surrounding waters to do what is good for those of us who will be directly affected by this proposed project. We thank you for hearing our concerns and for you attention to this matter. Respectfully yours, � �4/01 D ECE0WE APA 1 9 2005 lu Joseph and Eleanore Polashock � SGuthoid Town Board of Trustees P.O. BOX 623 NEW SUFFOLK,NY 11956 Ap &_L- /�, 2005 L n r Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President � FBoard of Town Trustees 9 2005 1�` PO Box 1179 _____� Southold,NY 11971 BoardN Trustees Dear Mr. Krupski, This letter is to express my,concern about the planned building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk) in the boat basin area of New Suffolk, and the impact of this-project on the tidal waters and wetlands in and around New Suffolk. In particular I urge you to consider: 1)the lack of any proposed environmental clean up of the site. It is a well known fact that this area contains toxic substances accumulated over 160 years, including but not limited to coal, oil, kerosene, fuel oil, gasoline, lead and copper. Disturbance of the site, without a complete and thorough clean up, could contaminate the waters of the bay and affect the marine flora and;fauna for decades to come; 2)the impact on the waters of the bay and the bay bottom of adding up to 153 boats to the already heavy water traffic; on weekends the two boat ramps are under almost constant use, and increasing the number of boats being lifted or pulled will also add to the discharge, both on land and in the water, of toxic fluids during this process; 3)the plans show no provision for a pump-out station, and no sanitary facilities; what happens to the human waste and garbage from the boats on the water, and boaters on land? 4)the obliteration of New Suffolk's scenic waterfront, a well recognized jewel of the North Fork and a `destination' for many visitors. In addition there is the danger to the public from the frequent use of the forklift, and from the increased volume of automobile traffic, both to residents on foot and patrons of the restaurants both on and off the site. I urge you to take these concerns into consideration when you are reviewing the application, and either refuse approval (preferred) or to send it back for very substantial revision and down-sizing, and instructions as to what-must be done to bring it to code without a whole string of variances attached. S' erely, ' Prunella M. Brashich Eud_ g yip -off Tyr. Irl-01P54, APR 19 2005 , V . ��� souse Id nwie: oa /7Q ale cicle foop�� � a'a�r- ��QaQ a� f/ie sE�. �jzs, 7i�J •.��� � 7�6zd Ztf/� o�arr�lzYeu� /�LJ�UJ LLGGC,�/ � xa-zle7, 4� �xrlam .0 '72 ow �G �'-eQc� Q 6oz.� C/an�e�° �ie�Jhv-e C/o, IlatA01>96t could �se����• �irr �d �o� Ll/ �Z - - 6C1G2 G20r� '� Cil` ZL/1i.S jvv�'o a:ced�Lan �co?ne l�t4I Awk1wd. �J a co-22c-eVn . �t � mQ�fion 7�& 36nz'lQis 2, �l� 6Grvl bach � �/h�' �s CZ /ads/;Do ,,,,?Z( z��Z CI�Pt not �eeryc � �av-e a��l moa �'�sur� �/� �s�oufc� c,�e �sa6ofa�Q our wa r � �rnort of�s ��, 2 XaJ Xeco7ne z��z la, scc�.e � o/- l- LL%/2s. X CQniJOt l/JUl�2 �cYn�QaYl�/�Q1�7On � �lfhou cs/a . / csfo �� �i�e �rnPo,,-la�t deasi7� �MQll fZ,eCl ��,Is -1� 7%e 211�a6 � /&4 -7oi �u� a tfzh0, 12 dna tt� c�� v J ll�ew�c�f�lk (631) ljq- 0022 Thomas C. Samuels and Nancy L. Steelman 7092 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, NY April 19, 2005 EC � � n� Albert Krupski, Chairman D V Southold Board of Trustees APR 19 2005 Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 southofd ToM Board of Trustees Re: "MATT-a-MAR by the BAY" Application New Suffolk, NY Dear Al and Trustees, Please note that we have serious concerns about the Matt-a-Mar by the Bay application to construct boat racks and parking on the old North Fork Shipyard site in the center of New Suffolk. This project is inappropriate in scale, appearance and intensity of use, and will have a serious impact on the uplands and tidal wetlands within your jurisdiction. Over the last twenty+years, at least three major projects by different developers have been proposed for this site, including condominiums, extensive marina expansions, and enlarged restaurants. Now comes a project for boat racks to hold 153 boats. Like the previous applications, this project has serious problems that should prevent its approval by your board. We respectfully request that you consider the following concerns: 1. Although the proposal calls for"high and dry"storage,the project proposes 153 new boats in Cutchogue Harbor, each contributing to the contamination of the marine environment and congestion on the bay With gasoline, maintenance chemicals, sanitation and waste water, the salt water quality must suffer from these additional boats and their occupants. 2. The soil on the site is reputedly contaminated by years of ship related activities The proposed concentration of this many boats, cars and a forklift will make the subsurface contamination worse. Should it not be cleaned up of existing pollutants, prior to adding new ones? Excavation for boat rack footings will bring contaminants to the surface. Everyone knows the site floods, sending toxic runoff right into the bay. 3. There are no new sanitary facilities shown on the site plan, although a greatly expanded public presence on the site is proposed. What sanitary facility will boat owners and their guests use at the end of the day? The plan does not show new rest rooms for their use. There is an existing restaurant, of course, but its sanitary system is barely sufficient even for its own loads. Is it also expected to service the users of 153 boats? If so, the system will be overwhelmed, causing unpleasant results. At the least, this issue should be referred to the Suffolk County Health Department for its approval. 4. Is there no need for a pump-out facility? 5. We wonder if this application represents the owner's complete intentions for the site. You should expect additional applications in future for work to the restaurant and marina. 6. Aesthetically, this proposal will destroy the character of the hamlet center and block its view of the bay Regulation of the waterfront view-scape should be one of your chief concerns in reviewing this application, per the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. Thank you for your service on behalf of New Suffolk and the Town, Sincerely, Tom Samuels Nancy n "�- cc: NSCA Mdeve Dear Mr. Krupski: I am writing this letter in regard to.the proposed MaIiipyard,,in New Suffolk. My house is directly across from the above site and it's expansion would have a direct effect on my residence. That being said, I do realize that something will eventually happen to that property but I feel that the Matt-A-Mar proposal is way too big and would have a profound effect on the hamlet of New Suffolk. I'm sure that you are aware of the environmental effect that 160 boats would have on the already fragile bay and the influx of car traffic that would have a huge impact on the hamlet itself, but I would like to address something else....the visual impact. Im an artist and college professor at Kean University, in Union, New Jersey and next year I will retire and spend all my time in New Suffolk, I have family there and in Riverhead where i was born and raised. Matt-A-Mar wants to install a thirty five foot high wall of boat racks along First Street in New Suffolk, this would be an absolute disaster. These racks would tum the street into an alley. The building plan that I received from East End Design contained no street.elevation;. drawings and it's no wonder, this proposal would tum the hamlet into an industrial site. I know that there many other concerns about the Matt-A-Mar proposal that are far more important than visual esthetics, but New Suffolk has a certain charm that would.lost forever if the their proposal is approved by the Southold Board of Trustees. Yours truly, Ted Victoria 17250 Main St. Box 218 _New.Suffolk, NY 11956 631-734-7663 `_ . . . . _ jDE C V F APR 1 92005 � , 3�0� "SautholA'iown _ Board of mslees... 1 �4 -0 G 7Ak D, 67 a--s;7Ae Aaaa� ._ _ _.. 7--Z - /�?- •- . _ _ _ ,._. i41� cam.,- �� --og 3 ou - _- (/ a /O (57 - __ ._ .. _-- r_. . •—Z(qL .�lix/_ CJix�L. Qiz�BT.c��_- - Au��arc-�_ L 21 o N /7' _oon_'1 BE,4uT_/ d=.UL _ -- - �2Cco�--//=-0�e� OZdL 7•tJGt-tvf,�_ ,�70777__.cPh�Gl,t!ri. /�t/�✓C� . U �.- - APR '1 -9 __20'0 2005 -- - - - ---- - - -- - -. . 0 72e� 76--- -. - � From: Mary Hovey<nmarella@optonline.neb Subject: Matt-a-Mar @ Cutchogue Harbor Date: April 19, 2005 11:32:45 AM EDT To: Board of Trustees 4/19//2005 Mary Hovey ��� P. O. Box 212 New Suffolk, NY 11952ELI Mr. Albert J. Krupski, Jr., PresidentBoard of Town TrusteesP. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski, It has come to my attention that Matt-a-Mar wishes to expand to New Suffolk with a significant amount of boat racks located on land bordering Cutchogue Harbor. I live in Mattituck near Strongs Marina on James Creek. I look at their boat racks year round. Four things come to mind in ascending order of importance. 1) The racks are an eyesore. 2) There is a lot of added vehicular traffic through our residential neighborhood. 3) There is a lot of noise from boat yard activities year round and summertime weekend parties. 4) There is water pollution, gas, rubbish and sewage which sometimes makes its way upstream to me. Our pristine coastal land belongs to our people and should not be used to add tourist sites for residents of Nassau County who pay no taxes here and who add only marginal support to local businesses while clogging our roads and whose presence pollutes our environment. I hope that you will not allow another blight to descend upon us. Sincerely, j Mary Hovey FACPRnn � 70 New Suffolk Road U ew Suffolk, NY 11956 pril 18, 2005 9 2005 j Albert J Krupski, Jr , Preside .t Board of Town Trustee Southold Town P O Box 1179 Board of Trustees Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr Krupski, As a resident of New Suffolk, I am alarmed about the.possibility of Matt-a-Mar's plans to expand their facilities on our hamlet's waterfront. There are many issues to consider, all of which I believe would have a negative impact on the area: 1 The impact on the bay and bay bottom of adding 153 boats to the water traffic, 2. The discharge on the water and on the land of toxic fluids from these boats as they are lifted from the water; 3 The addition to the land and water from contaminants associated with maintenance of this number of boats; 4 The lack of any environmental cleanup of the site, which contains 160 years of 'toxic substances(including coal, oil, kerosene, fuel oil, gasoline, lead and copper), 5 The volume of human waste and garbage from the boats on the water and the boaters on the land at a site with no pump-out station and no'sanitary facilities Mr Krupski, the impact of the expansion would have disastarous ramifications for the quality of life for the New Suffolk residents. The increased traffic, noise and pollution, as well as the loss of the hamlet's scenic waterfront viewscape, will lead from a charming locale into one in which we will regret settling in the community—as well experience a drop in the value of our homes. YOPTS truly, ose Ann Burns t =, April 16, 2005 To. Albert J Krupski, Jr. x President, Board of Town Trustees VPO Box 1179 D Southold,NY 11971 APR 1 9 2005 From: Stephan Roussan Southold Town 415 Third Street Board of Trustees New Suffolk,NY 11956 RE: Matt-a-Mar New Suffolk Project Dear Mr. Krupski and Members of the Board of Town Trustees, My apologies for not appearing in person for the April 2&public hearing, I.hope that it will be extended long enough so that all concerned voices are heard. There are many, and I believe that the public notice requirements should be met. Having attended many public hearings in the past, I am equally concerned that an issue so critical to our community's waterfront, residential character, and environmental quality has been buried as the 15th of 16 items on the agenda. I don't mean to diminish matters of concern to other fellow residents, but we all know that this is an issue of wider impact and scope than a sign that is too big or a dog that is barking too loud. I am both a local business owner and property owner, and not one to poke into the affairs of others. I am not comfortable telling people what they can and cannot do with their land, or that they are not free to pursue a particular vision or enterprise. The entrepreneurial spirit is part of our core American values and should be encouraged whenever possible. There are circumstances, however, when the vision of a few comes at the expense of the many. I was hopeful that the Matt-a-Mar Marina would not become such an issue, but a cursory analysis of the plan suggests that it will. It is no secret that the residents of New Suffolk have vehemently opposed every marina or large-scale development project ever earmarked for the proposed marina site. By now we have surely earned the reputation of being a difficult bunch. I assure you, it is not for the sake of being difficult... it is because we understand the notion of critical mass. We understand that when big things happen in small places, small places cease to exist as they were. It happens time and time again; it is all around us. On Long Island, we are suffocated by it with every passing year. Much of this may seem inevitable, but New Suffolk residents,tend to feel that they should have a say in determining how its future as a community should be shaped. This, too, is a core American value and should be encouraged whenever possible. New Suffolk is a place with a very unique neighborhood character. It is not manicured' like Orient, quaint like Southold, spirited like Greenport or suburban like Mattituck. It is neither touristy nor strip-malled. Ultimately, the hamlet is just an honest collection of the r :,. people who live here... the sum of its parts, no more and no less. People are friendly but private and, as individuals, tend to be very different than from one another. Yet there is one thing we openly share; a collective love affair with our waterfront. The strange thing is, our waterfront is just like New Suffolk itself—unplanned, unmanicured, and rough around the edges. There is no question in my mind that something must be done to improve the stretch between Capt. Marty's and the Robin's Island property. In its current state, it is an eyesore. In communities even more meddlesome than New Suffolk, there would be a mandate of the current property owners to achieve at least rudimentary maintenance of the grounds. Try leaving a lot in such condition in Hyannis or Martha's Vineyard (or maybe even Orient), for instance. Apathy towards one's neighbors is typically not the best way to curry favor for future plans. The physical site is, in my opinion, appropriate for a reasonable level of commercial and/or marine use. Jetties, storage buildings and boat slips have been a part of the landscape there for many years. A vibrant, well-kept, small-scale marine facility operating on the premises could be a real asset to the community. Perhaps it would lead to the restoration of a second restaurant, a general store or another compatible venture. Reasonable use is typically better than lack of use and general neglect, which is where we are now. What is not reasonable is standing aside and allowing the site to become worse. High& Dry boat storage would be a disaster for the community. I understand the economics of s wanting to pursue it, but the consequences are far too great. A few examples why are as follows: - Aesthetically poor from all vantage points, both on land and from the water. - Gives an instant industrial feel that is not compatible with residential - Takes the waterfront view away from everyone. - Generates far too much traffic for the location and local roadways. - Creates constant noise and odor from the lift cranes on busy summer days. - Adds too much boat traffic in an already busy corridor with the public ramp. - Creates sewage issues because of shallow ground location and no drainage. - Further deteriorates the air as well as water quality of the surrounding waters. I hope the board–and most importantly the property owners and Matt-a-Mar–will consider these factors and revisit their approach. Perhaps in the future, an acceptable blend of business opportunity, responsible use, and compatibility with the surrounding community can be achieved. If the project is undertaken in this spirit, success will be attainable and to the benefit of us all. Sincere , St an Roussan U, v�� C 1 E April 18, 2005 `9U �4yY } APR 2 0 2005 ';� �•C� Southold Town Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees Southold Town Board of Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski and Members of the Board of Trustees, I am writing on behalf of the New Suffolk Civic Association regarding the proposed installation of 17 Boat Storage Racks in New Suffolk by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay. In addition to the boat storage racks, Matt-a-Mar also wants to create 185 parking spaces to accommodate those people storing their boats. Matt-a-Mar's proposal is, so, not in keeping with the area, as to be almost laughable. This project would seriously affect an area that typifies and defines the Hamlet of New Suffolk. In reviewing the plans of Matt-a-Mar On the Bay,there are many negatives and, as far as our Association is concerned, no positive reasons to allow this installation to take place. Yes we want to have a marina in New Suffolk. Yes, we want to have a restaurant as part of that marina. However, both should be small and should allow growth in such a way that would not have a severe impact on the bay,the land and would not obliterate the hamlet's scenic waterfront. j The way the current proposal stands, the 153 boats and 185 cars would impact the bay and bay bottom. i Installation of the racks would disrupt the land that has never undergone an environmental cleanup to rid it of contaminants. There is no mention in the proposal of a pump-out facility and sanitary facilities. The i danger to the public and to the cars parked under the boat racks and in other places in that particular area as forklifts go about hauling boats in and out, is incomprehensible. t We, as a Civic Association charged with promoting the betterment of our Community, feel that the people of Matt-a-Mar have no regard for the fragile nature of the New Suffolk Waterfront as clearly demonstrated by the toping they put down in the boat storage areas bordering the waterfront. The materials used were discarded road surfacing taken up along Route 25 when it was resurfaced last fall. This, in addition to the + existing contaminants on that land, is what is now flowing into the Bay whenever it rains. Is this a responsible action, we think not. f We would welcome any opportunity available to us to work with you as Trustees for the Town and with the people from Matt-a-Mar in trying to find an amicable solution to revitalizing the New Suffolk waterfront area. Sincerely, - La{Lren Grant President NEW SUFFOLK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 642 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 sit1 � � E o � � �7 D - � April 15, 2005 DIANE&DENNIS HA ji I APR 2 0 2005 � Mr. Albert Krupski,Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Southold Town Southold Town Hall Board of Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Boat Storage Racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay(New Suffolk) Dear Mr. Krupski: Though some speculate that the storage racks might prove lucrative for our business,I am not convinced. Sure, it may bring in s little extra business,but on the other hand, it could substantially hurt our business as well. Let's face it, do you really think you're going to hear the local folks or the day-trippers say, "Honey, let's go down to Legends and have lunch. I'd really love to look at those really cool, monstrous `metal filing cabinets' for boats they have across the street while we eat." Oh, yeah,that'll be a real draw for us! Here are a few of the other things we are concerned about: - 4 levels: "car parking" (allegedly) plus 3 levels of boats Who is going to police it to see that the Ist level is indeed used for cars and not boats? Quite frankly, we welcome saving$400.00 per month in parking rent; however, if there is street parking are our customers now going to be competing with the "boat people"for parking spots? - Entrance on Main Street for this marina (or is it an industrial?) complex Hmmm, wonder if our founding fathers foresaw Manhattan-esque parking garages for boats on the scenic waterfront years back? So, if the entrance is on Main Street that means the sidewalk/curb area, where cars currently can park, would no longer be intact and available. That means even more public parking being taken away from existing businesses. - No sanitary facilities What happens then?Before or after boating,people stop at Legends and use our restrooms?Sure, we may get some extra business as a result, but there will be many more who just come to use our facilities. Who is going to `fund"our soon-to-be `public"restrooms and overtaxed cesspools? The town? - Garbage/Cardboard Where will that go? We ave a 'postage stamp"size piece of property, so will that then have to take up several of the street parking spots? People come to the North Fork not only for its picturesque seaside settings,the fresh air and natural beauty of our creeks, beaches, farms &parks,but as a haven of peacefulness& serenity. Somehow it doesn't seem that this marinal metal jungle& its accompanying forklifts will be a draw for the average tourist, (without whom Legends would certainly not be able to survive !). Imagine wanting to take a drive down to historic New P.O. Box 321 835 First Street . New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ph: 631-734-5123 Fx: 631-734-2642 www.northfork.com/legends Suffolk to see the soon-to-be rusting metal monster and to smell&hear the motors and fumes. Whatever are we doing to the pastoral settings the North Fork is renowned for, if we allow metal monstrocities to mar our beautiful landscape? Gee, why's everyone fretting so much about where Legends' customers will park? It's simple. Why don't we just join the metal-mania and tear down the house we own behind Legends on 2nd street(zoned business)and put up a 3-story parking garage for our customers' cars? Sincerely, Diane Harkoff cc: Tim Kelly, Suffolk Times AM 2 0 2005 J April 15, 2005 DIANE&DENNIS HARKOFF Southold Team Board of Trustees D Mr. Albert Krupski,Jr. President Board of Town Trustees CJ, Southold Town Hall ' PO Box 1179 ll A. ' Southold,NY 11971 l LL. :{ RE: Boat Storage Racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay(New Suffolk) Dear Mr. Krupski: Though some speculate that the storage racks might prove lucrative for our business, I am not convinced. Sure, it may bring in s little extra business, but on the other hand, it could substantially hurt our business as well. Let's face it, do you really think you're going to hear the local folks or the day-trippers say, "Honey, let's go down to Legends and have lunch. I'd really love to look at those really cool, monstrous `metal filing cabinets' for boats they have across the street while we eat." Oh, yeah,that'll be a real draw for us! Here are a few of the other things we are concerned about: - 4 levels: "car parking" (allegedly) plus 3 levels of boats Who is going to police it to see that the 1st level is indeed used for cars and not boats? Quite frankly, we welcome saving$400.00 per month in parking rent; however, if there is street parking are our customers now going to be competing with the "boat people"for parking spots? - Entrance on Main Street for this marina (or is it an industrial?)complex Hmmm, wonder if our founding fathers foresaw Manhattan-esque parking garages for boats on the scenic waterfront years back? So, if the entrance is on Main Street that means the sidewalk/curb area, where cars currently can park, would no longer be intact and available. That means even more public parking being taken away from existing businesses. - No sanitary facilities What happens then?Before or after boating,people stop at Legends and use our restrooms?Sure, we may get some extra business as a result, but there will be many more who just come to use our facilities. Who is going to `fund"our soon-to-be `public"restrooms and overtaxed cesspools? The town? - Garbage/Cardboard Where will that go? We ave a 'postage stamp"size piece of property, so will that then have to take up several of the street parking spots? People come to the North Fork not only for its picturesque seaside settings,the fresh air and natural beauty of our creeks, beaches, farms &parks,but as a haven of peacefulness& serenity. Somehow it doesn't seem that this marinal metal jungle & its accompanying forklifts will be a draw for the average tourist, (without whom Legends would certainly not be able to survive !). Imagine wanting to take a drive down to historic New P.O. Box 321 . 835 First Street . New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ph: 631-734-5123 Fx: 631-734-2642 www.northfork.com/legends c. Suffolk to see the soon-to-be rusting metal monster and to smell&hear the motors and fumes. Whatever are we doing to the pastoral settings the North Fork is renowned for, if we allow metal monstrocities to mar our beautiful landscape? Gee, why's everyone fretting so much about where Legends' customers will park? It's simple. Why don't we just join the metal-mania and tear down the house we own behind Legends on 2nd street(zoned business)and put up a 3-story parking garage for our customers' cars? Sincerely, q Diane Harkoff cc: Tim Kelly, Suffolk Times April 18, 2005 Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay 117.-8-18 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President D E C IE 0V E Board of Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 APR 2 0 2005 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski and Board of Trustees: Southold Town Board of Trustees As Chairperson of the New Suffolk Hamlet Stakeholders, who recently reported to the Town Board, I ask that you include in your consideration of the Matt-a-Mar on the Bay boat rack proposal, and in your record, the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, the Summary of which is attached. Chief among the Stakeholders' recommendations for the New Suffolk waterfront property 117.-8-18 is enforcement of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, now Town law. Among its provisions pertaining to this property is the following: "Redevelopment action in this area should seek to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront and the continuance of water-dependent uses, BUT AT A SCALE APPROPRIATE TO THE COMMUNITY." And: "THE HIGH DEGREE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY,NOT TO MENTION THE UNIQUE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE NEW SUFFOLK AREA, IN GENERAL, HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR CAREFUL AND LIMITED REDEVELOPMENT." The plan proposed by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay for boat racks 34' high for 153 boats and space for 185 parked automobiles does not constitute "careful and limited redevelopment." Such construction would overwhelm the hamlet center, destroy any semblance of historic ambience, block our scenic waterfront views, and create hazards for any pedestrians on the small site or on the adjacent street. The noise of the forklift running back and forth at all hours and the stench of fumes from motors and bilges would render the center of the hamlet offensive to residents and visitors alike, including patrons of a popular restaurant and gift shop. There has been no environmental cleanup of over 150 years of accumulation in the soil and in the bay bottom of hazardous and toxic materials. There must be a cleanup before a spade is turned for any purpose. A thorough and current environmental study is essential for any redevelopment plan, requiring a positive SEQRA declaration by the lead agency. For the Board's information, the Planning Board, which has Matt-a-Mar by the Bay's application pending, as of April 8, 2005 had 44 letters from New Suffolk residents opposing the boat rack plan,plus letters from the New Suffolk Civic Association and from the North Fork Environmental Council. Attached is a copy of the NFEC letter. Finally, please extend the hearing. No public notice is posted on the property as of this writing, at 3:00 pm April 18, 2005, nor has one been posted in the last several days, as I have repeatedly observed. This has deprived many residents, all of whom customarily go to the Post Office on Saturday mornings, many of them walking by the property, of knowledge of the proposal which so vitally affects their hamlet and therefore no opportunity to comment on it. Sincerely, /) oan B. Robbins 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ab NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL,, INC. Rt.25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattituck, NY 11952 Tel.: 631-298.8880 Fax:631-298-4649 nfec1@optonilne.net www.nfecl.org Manch 15, 2005 Jerilyn Woodhouse,Chair Southold Town Planning Board l'O 13ox 1179 Southold,New York Dear Madame Chairperson, The first condition of the Henry Raynor proposal for development of a boat-storage facility in New Suffolk is, of course,the most obviously bad for the community-the size. It is too large for the area in terms of numbers of boats, in terms of height, and in terms of area to be used. One must consider, for instance, the added height of the boats themselves atop the already built(legitimate)thirty-five feet. It is not NFCC's business to comment loudly on aesthetics. But we are concerned, in light of the size of the plan, about traffic and the quality of the air in that area of the hamlet. The Planning Board must estimate in some reasonable way the number of cars which may be present(there could be more than one car per boat) and at what times they are likely to be at the site. These estimates must keep in mind the cars in the area in which diners are using and how all of this traffic may commingle or create gridlock. What will this mean for the residents in the nearby area? The engines of the boats will also create pollution and noise. We are also wondering whether the boats will be serviced at this facility-which, if so, -would create more concerns. We have concerns about how the water might be contaminated with the various chemicals necessary for boat cleaning,repair,etc. Therewill be impact on the water simply because of the boats being launched there- particularly those with engines. The Planning Board must consider carefully whether the building of any of this facility will require actual disturbance of the bay bottom in that area. This question has come up before and we believe that it has been agreed that it is best not to disturb the bottom because of the probability of contaminants resting there (because of former uses there) getting moved through the water to unknown destinations. But the Planning Board should be certain of what might be part of the project. Another major concern is that, so far,there is nothing noted for space for a pump-out facility. Again, water contamination is our big worry. New Suffolk has been an important place for all of the long history of the North Fork of Long Island. We want to be certain that it may continue to be a healthy community for those living in and visiting it. Yours truly, 71 Gwychroeder Executive Director MAR 1 7 2005 a non-profit organization for the preservation o -and;sea;alr and quallty_of4 e__ printed on 0 recycled paper New Suffoik Hamlet Stud• Sarnmary .rki,ue'4•"-'?•W+ ::Arf,:. +,ri!y`a^:Jyiiisi±a, i i;�y7F, ''.�• Vii:, Di''r�?i' S • New Suffolk Hamlet Center, the traditional commercial core of the hamlet, includes 21 parcels encompassing 8.97 acres, within the original 1840's grid and the waterfront. • Largest land owner in the Hamlet Center is the Love Lane Realty Acquisition Corp. now known as Mat-A-Mar Marina on the Bay which owns a 3.25 acre waterfront parcel at the foot of Main Street. • There are no vacant parcels in the Hamlet Center. ■ A Town owned 1.25 acre public beach is located in the Hamlet Center. ■ 3 zoning districts regulate land in the Hamlet center, R-40, H B, and M-II. ■ 50% of the land uses in the Hamlet Center are single-family residences, 24% are Hamlet Marine commercial uses. Only 8% are traditional Hamlet commercial uses. ■ The Hamlet Center supports 18 buildings, 67% of which are in good condition. ■ The Hamlet Center has a total assessed value of $113,500, generating $65,353 in total tax revenue annually. t 2, Hamlet Vision TOWN OF "r'R SOUTNOLO top ■.w �.°!. HAMM `...... p } ,.. ' STUDY NEW SUFFOLK Hamict Ccntcr R HAMLET MAGE Milo New Suffolk's Hamlet vision can be summarized as follows: ■ New Suffolk remains isolated from the rest of the Town by a band of wetlands, protected lands, and active farmland. The area within the protected band and the bay reflects a traditional development grid pattern, which it is essentially built out. ■ New Suffolk's grid supports a pattern of high density residential development (1/4 acre or greater). ■ New large-scale, high density development, is inappropriate in New Suffolk. • Limited opportunities for infill development do not exist in New Suffolk. The HALO zone should reflect the existing character of the hamlet and accommodate accessory apartments. • ' New Suffolk seeks to reestablish its historic maritime heritage by revitalizing the underutilized waterfront with water dependent and water enhanced uses, at a scale appropriate to the character of the hamlet of the present, not as it was 100 years ago. ■ New Suffolk's historic character is a vital aspect of the area's "sense of place" and should be reinforced. 2 Lowe OF SOUTHOlD 1 "ell HAMLET STUDY t ::::•.2,�'3.,�5s.:1:. .e'R'�:t': .i'.I.St..t:::t. :t NL'.'Y SUkTOLK t.. , N {.:;';. Ilamkt Center BASE•pr.���.p MAP '4 IYrihl bn!'I 1 � ♦�` S'.1.R IY U� ■ The Hamlet Center boundary was designed to reconnect the business district with the waterfront. ■ The Hamlet Center boundary runs along 2nd Street in the west, travels along the Town beach to the Bay in the south, follows the waterfront along the eastern boundary, and includes the waterfront property up to Orchard Street in the north, then south along 15t Street to King Street to its beginning at 2nd Street. 3 1 I ' �y 'r�' .29•w TOWN OF SOU BOLD H14Ml.ET �: ~•r' STUDY ;Ire. m rtti NT,W SUFFOLK • lrG�j;» �;.a KG""•:�•��e�`; Ilan,ktee,mr Ott' "tki�e�#tn 'r' ; �h�i� �'�•��...'" HALO Mu 13 "M MAP s0'�.1 i�igj�n If�C��i�_...�aw•r' it .. wun .C.r .... yip. A�`'n�t���� �•. r.• Mw►.10 Q ■ The proposed area of the HALO zone covers the entire developed portion of New Suffolk, outside of the Hamlet Center. The Western boundary corresponds to Grathwohl Road, the northern boundary is where Grathwohl Road and New Suffolk Road intersect. ■ The HALO zone is effectively, built out. Increased density for housing in New Suffolk should come from permits for second dwelling units. Such units can be either an apartment in a single-owner private dwelling or in a separate structure. 5, H_-7m1fe�4 tre_,n. the!g Weak rresseg Stakeholders defined the Hamlet's strengths and weaknesses and then determined how to address each. 6. H inlet Suss ina-ifiy Pringi�ale� 4 J i "Smart Growth" sustainability principles were developed for each basic component of the Hamlet; including: ■ Human Scale • Waterfront ■ Streetscape ■ Vehicular Circulation ■ Parking ■ Pedestrian Circulation ■ Public Transportation • Building Design • Infrastructure ■ Maintenance ■ Enterprise ■ Housing ■ Open Space Preservation ■ The Working Landscape • Historic Resources flecG'nyrrenfratio�1S Utilizing the general categories established in #6 above, various specific ' project recommendations have been compiled: ■ Human Scale: The development of a community meeting house within the Hamlet Center is recommended to preserve the human scale of the hamlet, thereby avoiding the need to utilize the school, which is outside the Hamlet Center. Reconstruction of New Suffolk Post Office and adjoining or adjacent small general store, within the hamlet center.- 0 enter:■ Waterfront: ➢ Enforce consistency with the provisions of the LWRP. ➢ Revitalize the underutilized 3.25 acre parcel to support public/private uses, preserving public waterfront access and uses while accommodating marine related uses (such as small docking facility for transient boats and a small marine motor repair shop) and other small commercial uses (such as one-story construction for small shops and/or offices). Preserve the main viewscape of the Bay in the hamlet center. Prohibit any building blocking Main Street. Preserve the opportunity to rebuild the Post Office and General Store. Rehabilitate the restaurant without major expansion. Prohibit rack boat storage and large boat storage buildings. .5 ➢ Designate mooring fields in Cutchogue Harbor. r Provide for transient moorings. Provide pump-out facilities. Lengthen the Town boat ramp for safer accessibility. Control runoff from storm water and road containments to protect the Bay. Preserve waterfront habitats, including wetlands. Make public restrooms at Town Beach available beyond the customary season, that is end of June to Labor Day. Keep trash barrels at Town Beach year-round with regular pickup. Add more benches at Town Park. ■ Streetscape: Underground utility lines. On-going street tree planting program, including the replacement of damaged or dead trees. Maintain an unobstructed viewshed along streets to the water. High intensity lighting and neon lighting should be avoided. All lighting should be shielded and directed downward. The First Street streetscape should be enhanced with decorative streetlights, street furniture and a distinctive sidewalk (brick pavers etc.). Street trees should be planted in front of the present Post Office. ■ Vehicular Circulation: Install a stop sign at the east end of First Street and Main Street. Install a stop sign at Orchard and First Streets. Prohibit on-street parking along the east side of First Street between King and Orchard Streets. All streets that end at the water should be accessible to the waterfront for use by the residents of New Suffolk. Designate a truck route into the Hamlet Center (Main Street/First Street) and impose a weight limit for roadways not designated as a truck route. ➢ Modest traffic calming is recommended throughout the Hamlet. Evaluate all sight distance impediments at driveways and intersections and correct as required. • Parking: No additional parking lots. ➢ Prohibit on-street boat trailer parking. ➢ Create a one day permit for a car and trailer parking. 'v ➢ Provide parking either on the east side of First Street between King and Main Streets. Enforce parking regulations, especially at the bay ends of the streets. ■ Pedestrian Circulation: Existing sidewalks need to be repaired and maintained. Sidewalks and walkways should be limited to major roadways such as New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk Road, and Grathwohl Road. New sidewalks are not necessary on the smaller roadways. Striping intersection crosswalks in the Hamlet Center and at the school is recommended. This might be done in conjunction with curb narrowing as a traffic calming measure. ■ Public Transportation: ➢ A permanent bus stop is not necessary. Enhance Dial-a-ride. ■ Building Design: Eclectic mix of architecture adds to the charm of the Hamlet. Extend Architectural Review Board jurisdiction to include residential structures. ■ Infrastructure: ➢ Flooding is a major problem. The hamlet center is a flood plain. It is recognized that as a waterfront hamlet, periodic severe flooding will occur, however, it is imperative that routine flooding be controlled. Opportunities to control and detain stormwater upstream should be investigated. A flood hazard mitigation plan is needed, as stated in the LWRP. Puddling on roadways is also a nuisance and should be eliminated through drainage improvements. ➢ Underground utility lines. ■ Maintenance: ➢ Adequate garbage management at all business locations is needed. Buildup and leakage of restaurant cooking oil must be prevented. ➢ Excessive dust and sand on roadways needs to be cleaned regularly. Excessive noise from businesses impacts the surrounding residential neighborhood and should be controlled through a noise ordinance. ■ Enterprise: The Hamlet Center should support modest and limited business activity. Large scale commercial activity would be inconsistent and inappropriate. Exclude "hotels"from the list of permitted uses in the Hamlet. 7 ■ Housing: Change zoning code to allow enhanced density in the HALO zone, specifically second dwelling units on eligible parcels. Allow second unit as an apartment in a principal dwelling, or separate building Define eligible parcels as those above 1/4 or 1/2 acre, served by public water. Over 100 such parcels are evenly dispersed throughout New Suffolk. Limit size of second dwelling, in the range of 850-1250 square feet. ➢ Support affordable program with property tax policy: as long as program guidelines are followed, exempt or reduce property tax on second unit. Second dwellings on residential parcels could also help preserve open space. Allow owner of a qualified parcel to purchase a development right from town DR holding agency: entitles him/her to construct habitable "guest house." Tax guest houses, and apply proceeds to affordable housing or open space preservation programs. ■ Open Space Preservation: Highest priority is given to the ballfield and Town beach and park. The long term preservation of these facilities must be assured. Improvements to existing public access areas to the waterfront is a goal. ■ The Working Landscape: Appropriately scaled traditional maritime businesses should be encouraged. Large scale facilities would not be consistent with the character of the Hamlet. Exclude "food processing" from the list of permitted uses in the M-H district. ■ Historic Resources: ➢ Designate the entire HALO zone as a historic district. There are 48 New Suffolk structures, past and present, on the SPLIA list. Three properties, including the present School House, are in the National Historical Register. Several large historic trees warrant special designation and protection. ➢ Preserve historic barn on the 3.25 acre waterfront parcel. It is the sole remaining historic building on the property and is on the SPLIA list. Regulate construction within district per approved guidelines, including architectural review for commercial residential structures. R r ' A VISION r-OB NEW SUrrOLK'S COMMIEnCIAL BAYpRONT April 2, 1993 We believe there may be a viable alternative to private development, which would address the concerns of the community and those of the environment. This alternative Is public acquisition of the land coupled with commercial and recreational use of the site. if this mix were achieved, the public would have access to the waterfront, and the commercial heart of New Suffolk could be revived. The site is partially bisected by Main Street, as a continuation of which extends the old pier. With the participation of the Town, this structure could be rebuilt as a Town bock, perhaps In conjunction with a relocated town launching ramp, now located nearby at the foot.of.-Jackson Street. The marina, which was severely damaged by Nor'easter 92, could be rebuilt on a smaller scale to serve transient boat traffic (long term dockage at this site has always been problematical due to Its exposure to the East). The portion of the site to the North of Main Street could continue in Its role as commercial core of New Suffolk, by restoring the General Store/post Office, allowing limited expansion of the Galley -Ho, and by leasing space to other small scale businesses, which would operate as concessions of the public landowner (as Is the case In numerous other examples). in this way "downtown" New Suffolk could be revived in keeping with the small 'scale of the existing hamlet. Similarly, we would seek the participation and support of the Cutchogue-New.Suffolk Historical Council, to create a satellite museum of the one they operate on the Village' Green In Cutchogue. This museum could contain historical artifacts and memorabilia of New Suffolk's seafaring history, Including the submarine base. Perhaps a builder and restorer of wooden boats could locate ori site, adding a compatible commercial component. The portion of the site to the South of Main Street has a stretch of beach, on which wlndsurfers are rented. This operation could continue, perhaps along with a relocated Old Cove Yacht Club. This could also be the site of a small park to compliment the nearby Town Beach, and potentially, a small recreation building, such as the "Wharf House" at f=ounder's Landing in Southold, to be-used for community events sponsored by the New Suffolk Civic Association and others. One benefit of the public/private nature of this idea Is In fundraising. With public ownership, a broad range of options exists for obtaining the financial support of other public bodies, such as the county and state. We would seek grants from any and all appropriate sources, public and private. f=or the sake of local control, we believe It Is In the best Interest of New Suffolk and the Town for title to be held by the smallest public entity practical, such as the Cutchogue-New Suffolk park District. In conclusion, we envision a newly restored heart for our community, based on Its historical Identity, Its physical limitations and the realities of the local economy. We see this project as the embodiment of our commitment to New Suffolk, and as the best way to achieve bur vision of what life In a small town should be. Though small Itself, New Suffolk Is near and dear to the hearts of many people, who are all distressed by the destruction and decay of Its commercial bayfront. We ask you to share with us this new vision for Its future. TS t Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski, Jr and the Board of Trustees, I am a 15 year resident of New Suffolk and very concerned about the SUSAN A. NOONAN proposals to expand the marina. There would be a very negative impact MANAGING PARTNER on the Bay by adding 153 new boats and the traffic and pollution would be bad. SAN GROUP, LLC 27 N MOORE STREET, I am very worried about the lack of any environmental clean up of the site SUITE IOC that contains 160 years of toxic substances. The sanitation facilities NEW YORK, NY 10013 Would be very strained. Our lovely views would be obstructed. As a T 212 966-3650 mother of three active children I am very concerned about the added car M 917 513-5303 SUSAN@SANOONAN.COM and people traffic to our village. For all these reasons please block the plan to expand our harbor. Sincerely, Psan . Noonan FEE CM. NP ddosfTjrfd5 101 -D It DE061 - Board of Trustees � ` p 1� �J ELI"kj �� �. ��,1 �U arcs �+Jc. `� ��•e.n5� ; � w'a� 0� 1 . NM, (\10^cYr�, �r y r�• F May 2, 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay P. O. Box 1ig LM Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board of Trustees: We saw that your next site inspection of Matt-a-Mar by the Bay is scheduled for Wednesday, May 11. We would like to be notified of the time of the inspection. Thank you. Sincerely, Joan Robbins P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk,NY 11956 734-6047 Cc: E. Brownell Johnston T C775i MAY Soutl-wid Twwn Bcard of Trustees 71� a .t\y Wl my.LSC e� z,,..r,y-r.�w2, vwrt�arYipi�•.:sa'1'�s�!►: - „� ! �. as Y 'Y0. 6e/ � / �, t �•r��Y�t n /� f � - f�'\° f f�� ��,/ E/''♦ • t - .. fir, .. � ,/ ' /� �; ,•��` '!� �'ti. f♦�\ � y� � t • ` ANN 4 �. ilm 4 wm!m 4 t, �� I .. j _-�.�- +� • ....-. On !�?Q,,, S'� -Eas`� of ls� loo�,�s Sdu-�-� � - 1 _..� ` � � i 4 ��� tt � .._, ... .. - i�ri� �S'� S�f" ��"1 /'��•1 S'fr PP�7 — s-fa�Q r n5 w�S'1' dT �� ,Od� rv+s �Q� 3 ti 5 �R F c #r � -- , i i i � �• 1 ' 4 ( �f �Trce( JT(tir�(v!y Irl �rd OGJ�°�'I�s �E r r .. A a ib�-- /S� nzet 1�0 �r►!� Q nCl vi cj t nw� o �IJS �57� ..,:._ y3�x ;rc , ^ t: `4 b w Eo 017 6 � s L. Tl-,Q A5c,-,, c=, n 4 22.KARL & MARY CUTLER request a Mooring Permit in Deep Hole Creek for a 21' boat, replacing Mooring #623. Access: Private 23.Samuels & Steelman Architects on behalf of LYNNE ANGELSON requests a Wetland Permit to renovate and construct additions to the existing residence. Located: 950 Park Ave., Mattituck. SCTM#123-7-13.1 24.WILLIAM TUFANO requests a pre-submission inspection to discuss his plan to spread dredge spoil on the property for the purpose of constructing a dwelling. Located: 2462 Camp Mineola Rd. Ext., Mattituck. SCTM#122-9-7.15 25.Environmental Survey, Inc. on behalf of DENNIS HRANITZKY requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'X 25' fixed dock, 3'X 12' ramp and 6'X 20' floating dock. Located: 4105 Wickham Ave., Mattituck. SCTM#107-9-2.1 26.FRANK SHERLOCK requests a pre-submission inspection to discuss his violation for clearing within the 50' non-disturbance buffer. Located: 155 Breakwater Rd., Mattituck. SCTM#113-3-4 SOUTHOLD 27.Mark Schwartz, AIA on behalf of LUCILLE SEITZ requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 10'X 16' shed and a 3'X 40' timber dock with 3'X 6' steps to grade. Located: 675 Lake Dr., Southold. SCTM#59-5- 17&18 RESOLUTION Pursuant to Section 617.6 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR the Southold Town Board of Trustees establish themselves as LEAD AGENCY for the following project: Project Name : Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC Location: 650 First Street,New Suffolk 4.v 10 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OF SOUryOP.O.Southold,Box 1179 11971 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �0 �� Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS �� 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON Comm�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 11, 2005 i Ms. Naomi Handell, Environmental Analyst MAY 1 2 2005 Division of Environmental Permits New York State Department of Environmental Conservation R- o. Trusi, Building 40 — SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request for Matt - A - Mar by the Bay DEC Project Number 1-4738-01008/0008 The Planning Board is in receipt of the Lead Agency Coordination Request dated April 20, 2005. The proposed site plan application for SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 before the NYSDEC is within the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Planning Board. Accordingly, the Southold Town Planning Board has also received a site plan application for the action and pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617 is requesting to take and act as the lead agency for the proposed action. Please forward any issues of concern from your agency or any other that you may have received to date. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 765-1938, or Kieran Corcoran the Assistant Town Attorney at 765-1939. Sincerely ark Ter Seni nvironmental Planner Cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town PlanningB and Southold Town Trustees Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector MAILING ADDRESS: + PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,'0� SO!/r�o P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �Q l� Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS cia Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS �Q� 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR � GEORGE D.SOLOMON l (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.)CDU ,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 10 2005 E:1 y Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Expansion Located approximately 210' n/o Freeman Avenue on the w/s/o Wickham Avenue, known as 2255 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM#1000-114-3-1 Zone: M-ll, Marine II District Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 9, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new boat storage building of 28,480 sq. ft. and new 2-story office of 6,778 sq. ft. on an 8.5-acre parcel in the M-II Zone located approximately 210' n/o Freeman Avenue on the w/s/o Wickham Avenue, known as 2255 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, SCTM#1000-114-3-1; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2005 the Southold Town Planning Board started the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency for the proposed action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Section 617.6. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn�BWoodhouse Chairperson Mat-A-Mar Expansion- Page Two - May 10, 2005 cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Regqion One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 1179II-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX: (631) 444-0360 April 20, 2005FIA 1 71Town of Southold 2 7 2005Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Dear Sirs: _.. ....._.. ' B^ r�ofFTrustees The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Envi y eview ct EQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 3. Issues of concern your agency%elieves should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding. Project Name: Matt-A-Mar b, the Bad Location: 650 First Street DEC Application#: 1-4738-01008/00008 Permit Type: Tidal Wetlands SEORA Classification: [ ] Type I [ X ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status. [ X ] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action,but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days,we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assurmng the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at (631)444-0365 for further information or discussion. Sincerely, ;'1 �- Ccr\,Jd� Naomi Handell Environmental Analyst cc: (see distribution list) File _ 95-19-3(8/00)pfp JOINT APPLICATION +, New York State FOR PERMIT United States Army Corps of Engineers Applicable to agendas and permit categories listed in Item L Please read all instructions on back. Attach additional information as needed. Please print legibly or type. 1.Check permits applied for: 2.Name of Applicant (Use full name) Telephone Number (daytime) NYS Dept.of Environmental Conservation P) F] Stream Address Stream Disturbance(Bed and Banks) //� T f t,lr /5 G0 FI L; t� 7— C El Navigable V'Navigable Waters(Excavation and Fill) O [\ J �J F1Docks,Moorings or Platforms Post Office State Zip Code 1 (Construct or Place) /y 4:' ❑ Dams and Impoundment Structures 3.Taxpayer ID (If applicant is not an individual) (Construct,Reconstruct or Repair) f J ❑ Freshwater Wetlands Tidal Wetlands 4.Applicant is Wan: (check as many as apply) ❑ Coastal Erosion Control 51 Owner ❑ Operator ❑Lessee ❑Municipality/Governmental Agency ❑ .Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 5.If applicant is not the owner,identify owner here- otherwise, you may provide Agent/Contact Person information. ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Owner-or Agent/Contact Person ❑ owner EL Agent/Contact Person Telephone Number (daytime) ❑ Potable Water Supply A oU/, L /—� Sc/"' , ?�� ❑ Long Island Wells Mailing Address , ❑ Aquatic Vegetation Control '5—/U d Post Office State, Zip Code ❑ Aquatic Insect Control S c>&/ � L �TH ,r j � j ❑ Fish Control 6.Project/Facility Location (mark location on map, see instruction 1a.) NYS Office of General Services County: Town/City/Village: Tax Map Section/Block /Lot Number: (State Owned Lands Under Water) ❑ Lease,License,Easement or Location (including Street or Road) Telephone Number (daytime) other Real Property InterestL Utility Easement(pipelines,conduits, Jj ) 1 '151 t >/ W S N I d _ L"N cables, etc.) Post Office State I Zip COT,Name of Striso.1for Waterbody (on or near project site) ❑ Docks,Moorings or Platforms ( ; (Construct or Place) Adirondack Park Agency 8.Name of USGS Quad Map: Location Coordinates: ❑ Freshwater Wetlands Permit NYTM-E NYTM-N 4 ❑ Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9.Project Description and Purpose:(Category of Activity e.g.new construction/installation,maintenance or replacement; Type of Structure or Activity e.g.bulkhead,dredging,filling,dam,dock,taking of water; Type of Materials and Quantities; Structure and Work Area Dimensions;Need or Purpose Served) Lake George Park Commission /7— 1 9 C— ❑ Docks(Construct or Place) J. "' ❑ Moorings(Establish) �C./�S 4- PIMK//T(9 RR it US Army Corps of Engineers s ❑ Section 404(Waters of the United States) ❑ Section 10(Rivers and Harbors Act) ❑ Nationwide Permit(s) Identify Number(s) For Agency Use Only DEC APPLICATION NUMBER US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ropose Use: 11.Will Project Occupy 112.Proposed Start 13. Estimated Completion ❑ ❑ p_, State Land?❑ ❑ Date: Date: Private Public Commercial Yes No 14.Has Work Begun on Project? (if yes, attach ❑ 1:115.List Previous Permit/Application Numbers and Dates: (if Any) explanation of why work was started without permit.) Yes No 16. Will this Project Require Additional _ ,l / k _ Federal, State,or Local Permits? Yes No Please List. SQ 7 I I JOL D TU tt/,/ T)\ U—> ��� 15- 17. 17. If applicant is not the owner,both must sign the application I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further,the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage,direct or indirect, of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition,Federal Law,18 U.S.C.,Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years,or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up a material fact;or knowingly makes or uses a false,fictitious or fraudulent statement. Date Signature of Applicant _` ` � �/'' —---------- --- Title ------------------ Date 3=`�'�-O�Signature of Owners - ________________ Title _____"%" " Generali Instructions Incomplete or,inaccurate information may delay processing and a final decision on your application 1 Type or print clearly in ink Attach FIVE copies of additional Information required in A through C below A. A USGS map,or equivalent showing the project location. Include on the map wetlands,seasonally wet streams and ditches. B. A sketch plan drawn to scale or with dimensions given or-engineering drawings showing location and extent of work as well as view directions of the photographs required in C. C At least three(3)representative color photographs of the project area and surroundings with time and date When they were taken Indicated 2 Applications by counties,cities,towns,and villages must be signed by the,ckief executive of that municipality or the head pf the department or agency undertaking the project. i i`someone other than the owner is applicant,written consent of the owner to use the property/facility must accompany toile application -ha applicant is responsible for�obtaining any other federal,state or local permits Separate authorization or letter of No Jurisdiction Should be received horn the Department ::f tnvironmerital Conservation(DEC), Office of General Services'(OGS), Adirondack Park Agency (APA) or take George Park Commission(LGPC)and the Army Corps of Engineers(ACOEJ prior to initiation of work in wetlands or waterways. Location Coordinates(section 8)are expressed in New York Transverse Mercator units or NYTMs (UTM Zone 18 expanded to encompass the entire state). These are based cn the North American Datum 1983 If you are able to supply accurate coordinates,please do so. Otherwise the Department will determine them. Other Requirements C. If project is an unlisted action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act regulations-6 NYCRR Part 617,a completed Part 1 of a Short Environmental Pssessment Form must be submitted with the application If project is a Type 1 action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act regulations-6 NYCRR Part 617,a completed Part 1 of a Full Environmental Assessment =orm must be submitted with the application 8. If project is classed as major pursuant to the Uniform Procedures Act regulations-6 NYCRR Part 621,a completed Part 1 of a Structural Archeological Assessment Form must be submitted with the application 9. If project requires a federal permit and Iles within the Coastal Zone.a completed Federal Consistency Assessment Form must be submitted with the application 1 D If project is within the Adirondack Park,additional Information is required by the APA to fully determine permitting applicability. Special Requirements for Specific Permit Applications 11 Applications for the construction.reconstruction,or repair of a DAM or other IMPOUNDMENT STRUCTURE must be accompanied by Supplement D-1 12 Applications for DOCK,PLATFORM,or MOORING facility permits must be accompanied by Supplement D-2 13. Applications for Water Supply or Long Island Well permits must be accompanied by Supplement W-1 Applications for a permit to apply a Chemical to control or eliminate Aquatic Vegetation,Fish or Insects must be accompanied by the proper supplemental form available from the department 15. Applications for a Wild,Scenic,or Recreational Rivers permit must be accompanied by Supplement WSR-1 IS. Applications for a permit to disturb a wetland or waterway by placing fill or performing mechanized land clearing,ditching,channel zation,dredging,or excavation activities under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Article 24 and 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law should provide a discussion of practicable alternatives considered to avoid, minimize and/or mitigate the proposed project impacts Particular justification should be given as to why the alternatives are not suitable. Contact the Regional Permit Administrator,Division of Environmental Permits,at the appropriate DEC office;OGS,APA,LGPC permitting agent; or the respective Corps District Office,as given below,for assistance regarding any of the above requirements Consult other available application instruction materials for the appropriate permit types. I New York State Agencies: Distribution 1ST COPY Permit Administrator 2ND COPY Corps of Engineers 3RDCOPYProgram 4TH COPY NYS Agency 5TH COPY Applicant Department of Environmental Conservation REGION 1 REGION 7 Building 40 SUNY 615 Erie Blvd West Legend Stony Brook NY 11790.2356 Syracuse NY 13204-2400 .moi (631)444-0365 (315)426-7438 0 DEC Regional Office REGION 2 REGION 7 Sub-Office 1 Hunter's Point Plaza 1285 Fisher Avenue • DEC Regional Sub-Office 47-4021 st Street Cortland NY 13045-1090 •$ Long Island City NY 11101.5407 (607)753-3095 Adirondack Park (718)482.4997 5 REGION 8 REGION 3 6274 E.Avon Lima Road 21 South Putt Comers Road Avon NY 14414-9519 1 • New Peitz NY 12561-1696 (585)226-2466 (845)256-3054 • '��i REGION 9 � • 7 REGION 4 270 Michigan Avenue $ , 1150 North Wescott Road Buffalo NY 14203-2999 9 J �!1 • i 4••, Schenectady NY 12306-2014 (716)851-7165 (518)357-2069 I • _.___. ��� REGION 9 Sub-Once REGION 4 Sub-Office 182 East Union Route 10 Suite 3 • HCR#1 Box 3A Allegany NY 14706-1328 3 Stamford NV 12167.9503 (716)372.0645 (607)652.7741 REGION 5 .01 Office of General Route 86 PO Box 296 Services 2� 1 Ray Brook NY 12977-0296 Division of Land UGlizalionwo (518)897-1234 Bureau of Land Management Coming Tower Empire State Plaza REGION 5 Sub-Office Albany NY12242 P.O.Box 220 (518)474-4-2195 United States Army Corras of Engineers Warrensburg NY 12885-0220 Department of the Army ATTN: Regulatory Branch (518)623-1281 Adirondack Park Agency New York District,Corps of Engineers 26 Federal Plaza,New York NY 10278-0090 REGION 6 PO Box 99 Telephone State Office Building Ray Brock NY 12977 (212) 264-6731 for DEC Regions 1,2 and Westchester and Rockland Counties 317 Washington Street (518)891-4050 (212) 264-0185 for DEC Region 3 except Westchester and Rockland Counties Watertown NY 13601-3787 (315)785-2245 Lake George Park Albany Field Office Telephone (518) 270-0588 10589-DEC regions 4,5 REGION 6 Sub-Office Commission 1 Bond Street Troy NY 12180 I Stale Office Building P O Box 749 Fort George Road 207 Genesee Street Lake George NY 12845-0749 Buffalo District,Corps of Engineers Telephone (716) 879-4330-DEC regions 6,7,8, 9 Utica NY 13501.2885 (518)668-9347 1776 Niagara Street Buffalo NY 14207-3199 (315)793-2555 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME PH I- a ) Cllq P?O6 C" E'S 3. PROJECT LOCATION: // Municipality z W S !' O L l� County 6 !-1 FF Q L. 1;�' 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) Fid s T �- m��rl Si� � T` rl E� S� FF d L K 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: New G' Expansion L__I Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 1? 4eKS d-- PIIRKiI-) � i9 � E19_ 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ?, S acres Ultimately .7 J acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [�Yes ❑ No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Iul Residential Industrial Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open Space [:] Other Describe: M r5 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL)? D( Yes No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit/approvals: Soy i H0L -0 T- I--- r/ i2us T FES 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes 0 No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit/approvals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Yes 121 No I CERTIFY THA HE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: OQP, E Date: Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with is assessment OVER 1 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *0fSUUry� Southold,.O. Box 1179 11971 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �Q l� Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS cn Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS �O 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON roufm,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 MEMORANDUM Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: April 27, 2005 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees D C Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services APR NYSDEC - Stony Brook o 260 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers --J New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority F,,ai ?"'` Suffolk County Department of Public Works From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: Attached is a copy of the application received. The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay 650 First Street New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 This new site plan is for 17 boat racks with 153 boat capacity of 7,572 sq.ft. with 9 boats each rack includes maintenance of a exiting restaurant and storage building on 3.25 acres parcel in the MII Zone at 650 First Street located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117.-8-18 Please respond on your agency's position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File attachment • � ' SpFFO�,� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE a Southold, NY 11971 Chair CIO • OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS Ilk, Town Hall Annex��' KENNETH L.EDWARDS , �.� �� 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY E 1 7(:. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax: 631 765-3136 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OFA IIA�PR 2 8 2005 New Change of Use Southold Town Re-use ; - Board of Trustees Extension _ Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: - - yf FMC 19 L L SCTM#: 1000-. 1/ 7 Location: NE 5 616e-0 L l� Address: FA_ 0,6&-1 Name of Applicant: Pfd TQ/e Address.of Applicant: 4/O U /y� _ �� I) �� �L I) J7 Telephone: -2 ., ­7��"'_ Owner of Land: ,¢ TT- !�} 7H 1E L L <-- Agent Agent or Person responsible _ for application; Address: 11711 Telephone: .: 31 � 7 x.33 0 Site plans prepared by: .5 &5S0ciiga LL< Licerise No. Address: D -711 Telephone: S-- 1 S 1 Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPLICANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he is the�o�the above property, or that he is the Of the (Title) (Specify whether Parthip or corp which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Pian infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be Installed in strict accordance with the plans submltted: - Signe — - •-t�w,r�er) C� �fi• Signed_ (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me this qday of C. jxc' (Notary Public) MELISSA McGOWAN Notary Public,State of New York No.4995913 Qualified in Suffolk County . .v~ Oommission Expires May 4,20& ` Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application 3� Total Land Area of Site (acres er squareTeet-- y3a� i�yE Zoning District Existing Use of Site o i e� j STS L4d E� {"Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. ----- Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 7 7.Z Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Buliding(s) S, ill Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by _ 1`/0 Board of Appeals- Case # & date IN 0 Board of Trustees - Case # & date J NY State Department of Environmental Conservation Case # & date %yv Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decislon Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? ff so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued, NO ACTION(EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION)MAYBE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BV PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION t Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1 . To follow the established procedure, or 2. To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Department approval subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. B. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans, The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re: SCTM#: 1000- 117 - G � — "(icant Date p 6 AV PI,ICA NT 4 TRANSACTIONAI, DTSC1.OSj)RR PORN The 'Gown of SOuthOld 's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the parL of town off cers and em to ees. 1'I►e purpose of this form is to provide Information which can alert the town ofop ssible conflicts of Interest and allow it Lo take whatever action is necessary Lo avoid same YOUR NANR: W '—G l� " ! (Last name, E rst Mame, middle initial, unless you are Applying In the name or someone else or • other entity, sucl► as a company. IC so, Indlcal;e the other person's or company's name. ) NATURE OP AL'PL.ICATION! (Check ALI LhaL apply . ) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or orriclal map Other (If "Other," name the activity. ) S / 7-6 411 Do you persorially (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationsl►ip witl► any orCicer or employee or the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. V YES NO If you answered "YES, " complete tt►e balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) ► A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock or the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); fl) the legal or beneficial owner or any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant in not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee or the applicant; or D) the actual applicai►L . y: DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONS111P `iubmltl,ed Lit d y oC S1gnaL-ure Print, namp FEE CALCULATION TOWN CODE for SITE PLAN FEES: $300.00 per acre or fraction thereof: 3.5 acres (4) ($300.00) _ $ 1,200.00 .05 new building area Racks 7,572 sq. ft. @ .05 = $ 378.60 TOTAL $ 1,578.60 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It,5 r.xpected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, res irch or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action 51 �L f ly F01� ,I /1 TT- 19 -}_111,dK V I T-IJE I} 1�7` Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) KEt�' IV Sal �rL G /< Name of Applicant/SpoReor /9 M U 6 K Address City/PO (,r �� Q L- State /y Zip Code 7/ Business Telephone � 2 Name of Owner(if different) Lz 19 FT- /I _P, I? L L , _�7 / ,1 Address J, 0.z. L_ City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: C, i R19eks - P�RK/./ye.� �r�� Page 2 of 21 „ Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:E]Urban 11 Industrial ®Commercial EIResidential (suburban) D Rural (non-farm) F Forest ❑Agriculture BOther /!7 fi ” ��'�T�y '1 1/-1 % 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 ` Y_ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) S '-s--acres P Sp acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: dell drained c0 % of site ElModerately well drained % of site. E]Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? El Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approxi ate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: j 001' % O % 010- 15% % Ell5% or greater % 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or c ain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Li Yes No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes 2N o 8. What is the depth of the water table? _(in feet) Q5 0 '� 1f J � �/d� 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? „Yes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ID Yes „___ No Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ®Yes 00<0 -- According to: Identify each species: •f'E'j h •' 0'. `�l 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Yes 6'-No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently ed by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 11 Yes No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ElYes ON o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 f. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 • 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes R No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? • Yes E]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural distr' certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and `!W4? aYes o 19. Is the site located in or substantialffN uous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the EQ,"' and 6 NYCRR 617? El Yes o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes 9<0 B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ,� acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: _J acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % I' f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ��j proposed ?'c} g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: _height; f width; �Q length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? O tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes 1:1 No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ©Yes No ` c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E]Yes No 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? G acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 00 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? 11 Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1' months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? M, Yes El No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? El Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E]Yes No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ED Yes No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E]Yes D_no Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? E]Yes EtrO_____ If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes E]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? E]Yes No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E]Yes E]No c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: t 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Yes No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? &No . 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? nYes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E]Yes Ck No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient n ' levels? F]Yes _ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? R Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity' gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day — gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? E]Yes _____ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board Ca�Yes ❑ No O City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes No r State Agencies 0 Yes ❑ No 2,6 Federal Agencies Yes ❑,140 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning arnendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes 1:1No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? n�► /� i�y� '' rn �9 �i�l ZZ-� 1�1�!��,�� tl� �C-r g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/. mile? Yes No r 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Yes No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? E]Yes 17 No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 1:1 Yes No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E]Yes No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. FYes No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 4 s Revision No. i ! A � 2 " �• 1 DETAIL 14'-6' 3 34'-0' Q DETAIL Z A 30'-6' 30'-6"- 30'-6' " 30'-6' 30';116' 30'-6 2 � Q PLAN VIEW Q z (TYPICAL EACH ROW) 49 c Q —� 14'-6' I Z U SECTION A—A m LEVEL 3 Z Q I- 3 BOATS 8,000# EA. E O Q Q LEVEL @ sie x1322' ELTS p CA Z Z 12,500# EA. () LEVEL 1 34'-0' 3 BOATS @4 4 4 4 4 4 DETAIL 3 0 15,000# EA. DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION N , AUT❑M❑BILE Q 7'-0' PEN PARKING E _q z 0 30 '-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-'6' 30'-6' D 't O W I1 (' Or _JJ NOTE, RACKS TO BE LOADED sie x BOLTS tl MAR 3 0 2005 (; t_ t N > �- PER SPECIFICATIONS AS QUOTED. DO NOT OVERLOAD SYSTEM. FRONT ELEVATION ___—____J o LL Q SERIOUS BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE COULD RESULT. U T. (TYPICAL EACH ROW) Scutituie W Town u _ Board of Trustees Z N _ 0) o 0) N DETAIL 2 v O CO FRAME BRACE DETAIL 3 O TWO ROWS OF RACKS , U N DESIGNED WITH THE ? (j X FIRST LEVEL OPEN m r FOR AUT❑M❑BILE PARKING — PARTS LIST a a PART NO. DESCRIPTI❑N LENGTH QTY. W6 COLUMN 34'-0' 36 2 H❑RIZ❑NTAL 14'-6' 72 Drawn By 3 DIAG❑NAL 15'-0' 108 DH 4 W14 SHELF BEAM HVY 30'-0' 30 5 W14 SHELF BEAM HVY 30'-0' 30 Date 6 W14 SHELF BEAM LT, 30'-0' 11-10-03 y 7 TIMBER CLAMPS V5 -"+ �� ASLy Scale ',�, N T S Sheet ( '�•= Drawing Number 031160 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD SITE PLANS' For Monday May 16, 2005 at 4:00 PM Site Plan • Mat-A-Mar by the Bay New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-8-118 This new site plan is for 17 boat racks with 153 boat capacity of 7,572 sq.ft. with 9 boats each rack includes maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building on 3.25 acres parcel in the MII Zone at 650 First Street'located on the a/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117.-8-18 Action: Joint meeting with Town Trustees to review site plan as proposed. Review of estimate from NPV on SEQRA..', Staff recommendation:,The PB accepts NPV estimate and allow staff to send to agent for payment. PB considers sending the site plan to NPV to start preliminary SEQRA review as proposed. Still on hold pending Building Department variance determination. PB attachments: A-1, NPV estimate • Moore Law Office Southold, SCTM# 1000-70-2-8 Action: New revised site plan received May 9, 2005 and consideration in setting the public hearing for June 13, 2005. Staff recommendation: PB accepts sp as submitted and pending Building Departments Certification set the public hearing for 6/13/05. The application still requires ARC approval and the Town Engineer. Prepared by BS 05/12/05, 1:00pm Tetrault, Heather From: Terry, Mark Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:59 PM To: Tetrault, Heather Subject: FW: Underwater Lands This refers to Matt-a-Mar by the Bay -----Original Message----- From: Glew,Claire Sent: Monday,May 16, 2005 11:53 AM To: Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Underwater Lands Mark, On the microfiche 117-8-21 &22 are listed in the name of the Town of Southold but it doesn't refer to a deed of any kind 117-8-23 is listed as an unknown owner. Sorry it took so long. Claire -----Original Message----- From: Terry,Mark Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 3:43 PM To: Glew,Claire Subject: Underwater Lands Hi Claire, Researching the following parcels. There is no information in the RPS they are 117-8-21, 22 and 23. John Sep said you could check microfiche? 1 I. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *OF SUUry� P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �Q 01 0 Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS c/a Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON yC�UIY l,�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fag: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina Expansion Located approximately 210' n/o Freeman Avenue on the w/s/o Wickham Avenue, known as 2255 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM#1000-114-3-1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Ms. Moore: On May 10, 2005 the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2005) became effective as legislation. Please be advised that the action is now subject to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 95, please complete the enclosed Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Assessment Form and submit it to this department. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ark Terry D C E LS Senior En ironmental Planner LWRP CoordinatorMAY 2 7 2005 �on Southold Town Enc. Board of Trustees cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Southold Town Board of Trustees MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *0fSO!/ryo Southold,,ox 1179 11971 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �Q �� Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDSG �QQ 54375 State Route 25g MARTIN H.SIDOR 0 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D,SOLOMON IyCOUN(v�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request for Matt- A-Mar by the Bay Site Plan SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Ms. Moore: Please be advised that the Southold Town Planning Board is the Lead Agency for the above action. The Planning Board has reviewed the Part 1 Long Environmental Form (EAF) submitted with no date and has determined that the form is incomplete and incorrect. Please revise the following 1. Page 2 of 21, Description of Action 2. Section A. Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 14 and 20. _ 3. Section B. Items 12, 13, 16, 17, 6 (re-assess) and 12. The action is subject to Chapter 95 Waterfront Coastal Consistency Review and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (2005) of the Town of Southold Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 95 please complete and submit the enclosed LWRP Consistency Assessment Form for the action and submit it together with the amended EAF. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 765-1938, or Kieran Corcoran the Assistant Town Attorney at 765-1939. Sincerely rk Terry Senior E ironmental Planner Cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning B rd Southold Town Trusteesa Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer RESOLUTION Resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold that the application of MATT- A-MAR BY THE BAY,LLC-,more fully described in the public hearing item # 25 of the Trustee agenda dated Wednesday April 20, 2005 is, pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations, is classified as an Unlisted Action; and be it Further resolved that the applicant is required to submit Part 1 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF); and be it Further resolved that upon receipt of the LEAF the Clerk of the Trustees is hereby directed to commence a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA. o��S%3FFO���o Gyp Telephone p Town Hall (631)765-1892 _ y = 53095 Route 25 Q yC P O Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Mon., April 11, 2005, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Doris McGreevy, seconded by Don Wilder, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the Wetland,Permit application of MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC to construct boat racks and a parking area. Located: 650 First St., New Suffolk. SCTM#117-8-18 The CAC recommends Approval of the application with the following Conditions: - all run-off is captured and sent to drywells a full SEQRA review is conducted - the plans are compatible with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried 1 �rag FFO�,�c ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE OGy� Town Hall, 53096 Main Road TOWN CLERK co P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS � Southold,New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER ,!, Fax(631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER �01 ��� Telephone(631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer) . One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION 1. TO: (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requbsting.) T RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information. ) I1Q. -8 _ Signature of Applicant: Prtnted Name: o Address: 16 Ct(Qr /(� �,� �j..PJi !!9f9 Mailing Address (if different from above) : 190.0 11�4q Telephone Number: �Sy_i(Uq�j Date: ------------------------------------- [ ] APPROVED [ l APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* RECEIVED Elizabeth A. Neville AP19 i 6aiW Freedom of Information Officer Southold Town Clerk * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. Revisions - 6-1,-9e 10-14-97 $ - 09.27-0 06-06.01 06-12-01 x286300•" De-22-OI OAK 7-05.02 .cam 1 , RD. (509 R 28S.300 7-17-02 Tp a• I '" 1y s+-x s. 12 10.02 t4'•S' 3 2 R } t 4 5 t PATCH �7 LINE 01-07-03 I C a f »6 C - ,» 09-25-0• �/ + »l FOR PCL.NO. _ I S I lu 7 = SEE SEC.NO. 1-2Ac t 9 " 110-6-034 -- I kn i I.IA(c). 8 ' » - J.1 S.IA(c) 5' -y o TUTHILL - I.9A(c) t /y is3, 10 .r �• 1'4 a 7 a 20.1 20.21 is c i•1 `QO 4.2 T 11 s. O 11.5 i 1.3A n 4.1 � a 5 r 126» •+• ,' 19& t 2-31"C' _ 1.BA 2 O E• 1 In �3 ,n sa -'�_ x 12 `l- a » t- 17.4 _ 1 18.1 - IPJ FOR PCL. NNo. ode, a �N- A P 13 1.1A(c) Y+ "LlAlcl = 3 xs + s N 116-03-001 fis f 9 14 2 BA i`o •• 40 „° 4• 10 „ .o �5 + 16 � 17.J a 1� L2A c) t 6 T 4 S -8.6; .N a 8.4 F ,a 7 „ •v 11 6 ,n CEOROE +IELSEr » ' T'• + B s ,p,'%+ •t- / ; v 'R0. I>s.i 'so.1 so iy 2436.0 3 a a`4 3 9• ' x 8.2 18.4 c }5i y 1.4Atd SL3 5 1.J4tc1 �5 5 a 19 - la.z-' a- 34 t r 12.1 ti, CUTCHOGUE 13 4 „t "t 25 9 1,4A1G a 26 4• e `13 ♦ a- a 5 1.5A(c)A1.5A(c) e 33 14 a 5A( •s - u • 14 ss • 18.5 9 a p n,a a` s. ♦m 14.1 f a ti I.JA(c) �♦ 15 a 6 a1J t U) O 28 ii •]2 i '• • ''� y 4"a^{0 15 e ,'• 20 ? 29.1 21.2 so ti HARBOR a•- 12 t n-3•p " u' t 31 t 2.2AtG 16a _ s. s•, a °• 9b i i 1.6A1U _ O j 21, 29 t }H F \ _ T - 14 a 17 Il t 25 t 26 -2T i + "• y n fu IUNOEwATER LOD, 44 .R sI a 24 a °• Iso•I CYeel: 23 IflI , sv x.♦ 4T . E"L.•+ 110d HOUse 9 a - 5 22 0 2.2MC) 5t " W 46.4 46.7 10 1 r 9ta w 33 s. 6 i i 70 t 1.640 aY WW", 35 i S, " , FISHER t a36 a - a 1. 31 39 6Atd - _ •• _ 34 38 " a S.6Alcl i t + t33t , =}�• ," 3n 8 _ a 32" •• 51• 29 17 EB)CHARO p t L0!t i 2B i}D 2 t t la ++ ss " • y7.4Alc) I» •. a 12 _ :i 21 ° " • _ _ _ a+5 N C'1 _ +4 t T K "1.14 " • us _ 1 T 31i 7 13.2 17.1 9 # ,n O1 C t •• SO S Y 8 t n 24 i 27=LA 1% - 30 1 1a-_9 57 •» .1 t1p • O 26 = RD. 32 t5D') 29 " 1 o +»KOURO'S " _ "% = m x s p 616 a 18 0O .E4 SIFTOLE_ 8 9 In r 19.1 a 202 i Z 28.1 i 5EN00.Obt.t tIn"t o IN R 14.1 16.6 17 r 119.3 Z ra 31 Z 2.T Atc) 's 16.2 i s -[ 0 Km 8.1 >r _ a111 i 16 27 t rs,IN 1 °20.1 t _ _ •u• •�� °'"°` 1.4A(cl " 110 t -12 i a15L N is, 22 , t ,a-3"• n 3 m a - N 21 - 27 , a y+3 HE OLE 71" "w V+ 142 t V+i ® 3-SAId:-i♦ ' 16.7 • o» ©.P aa `^26.6. a. ^ 9 V50" -4 ,.e. 1S7. "' •; �1211321 w » , 14.2 r t 'IS - 16A S.lA a 22 a 27 '24 26.5 s2r.3c YAN T°.x OF • 22 t 27i 28.1 5}8i 6 < { 5outluLO 1,1-!••, ,3r n f0 150., p, Ia 16.1_ ! ,•. NE\ SUFFOLK AVE. a ++ 13 c -162 i . • R +a, as, p • (UNOER••'•TER 3••. + °°'_ - __�9 11 T 12 x i 124" _ +_ �a 1 2 41 5.1 5'7 8.1 t 2.6A1c1 a15.1i 19.2 26 31_ a 19�s. _ 3.3A1c1 r. 3 a 1.3A(.) MAW 32 O M M i • JACKSON SO22 2D.2 �` 1.3A(C) - • 420°•5 13 TMN a 1 2 1.2A(c) a 4.1 0 , a - " 12.1 •,23 _ 14.1._ .. _420.1 SOUT+aD _ • c y 209 • 2014 3.14(c) SA(c) 5 6 7 8 9.1 92 10 11 a 4t Y 16K M of 3•s ?a 3 s 1.2A 5 a p.D• 90 t - " 44 - _t.4c1 1 4� R Ia F.D. 29 e ns NA'YsHOREUNE BAY n „ze soo PECONIC GREAT „ze,sao a 1 W E.•e.r,T:Ne Lr. sm.wm Lm c FEE-- 9-WI Stlml06Nki'lln --SEN M36m,W+rkt Uro --„-- ARE ESi DRAWN OTTER FOL .LL PROPERTIES G E Lo* _�- s m em*eaa n (21) • O 0,a, t,1Y• -_F-_ t,na,u, "sR tIT"" T"E F � M wsTR¢TS: NOTICE o COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E 10 TD.H OF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO YANTENANCE,ALTERAT E emc 4•h u. --.-- N•,rctl0• kt U. =16T-- FRE 25 „TpRa T DN SALE F ®P Real Property Tax Service Agency Y CU CN9LLE N Sk•m/L10f• -• SM•a brr.lm a. Con„LYu -- LCNT Is T DISTRIBUTM OF WY PORTKN OF THE n I LVN 0I•ne,u. --L-- aeA.c.wmc.L..--•-- ••ER. C011lt Center RlverMn,aA, N Y 11901 ue uT wnt0n YLLALE OF b°.I1b- 27 0••a rw 12.1 4ttll lon ui. --- P.R% REFarSE I SUFFOLK COUNTY T.%4.P R PRON&TED `•M or 12.LL ._----- ra.a ma.t,a:,. --n [� +'"_. :•�,. -.0:,:v..-. •--•-. - •AR,LYCE ..STE••IEP IR•gUT.PoTTEN PERwSSNM•OF T16 •d SGLE N FEET:», O �~ b'., .•S-l.« _: n -..'-12.L-A.c,r. ,nca __ . -. t!r_a•,..:..-..e_.-.........._--._..-.. -!T,...��n.•..e•:aw.ve-._:i--::-n?..--v-�,+a+9•Ca+hYr^vn•+FiCi' w.:.+5x - 'a RE.L•.PROPERTT.T � ..C.'';,R e:,S:ga�..F;rA•:;,�.: �'!�..�'_'_ ':ei" Y.�{'JC'ti::{!�Y_.34.+i4..�a.:4C.�.::��'.T�v • .bs_,_ -q!?r^.,•-•' .^,• •rte-•-.-••�•...�..a=,.,. _ - «,a•�`K.vr�raS?a eS - .w=..+:.�;:.i a'�"r.':��.� ::.ii• ,I'-'..}"..>p^.7-. _ cv^t:^ - .r �naa •s'its- �:T,T., _,. ._ __ _ ""•'^�."':-^Y�'L'�"^^ ,w»..r..�r..w.pa....s•r.....n..-w.ya n�:'-.`7 �'._e.._ P_R P �•.,. ...il'..c.....r:.:.�''.- _ _ _ � _`�'��S�O�OO.,.: O ERTY`►1AP'= .FY.s.�.:' _ :...: -r-�--:-+-. -' ..•..._..... rte". . _•+ -4 r .s. .._. 7-s+ - ....,. ,a„-. _. -, t+..... .rnP;•„_._,.s.�-.-.: ........-..,.....- .. - _ - - -....,i�v:::e;..�=-.:.=rauFir,%P"6ai'+`a+:�'� _ F-. ..._ .:.- .-_ <"••;;. _.CI. .. .., =4 r~'� .-,..•-•..,y,1{,L ,�M. sF'a .y51+ .» !'$ -�.........Y9_."d 1.!.•.c•s.•.. .-r i....:a_•,....,... -...m.?`�' .. _ ,� .. .. _ .., -.. .. ..,. ",tf'+ - La2,.+2:. �>F•ss.•t_a:-��>„ `r-Frr•e.�v' .- . .. ... ....... ...,a •. -':'tsw.;•"9i.1`>S° �:'.�.. sEK6':`"227k�:^-ai� .t�,�"' ��+.,,^wir , -.-•,-. ., .- __._.-_ .....r..•++..��t. 2.1 •...a..+�a.,s_�.�.,::+ �+_i.:.yu: .e.[E.->z�z,.....:e`r.L.ay.=ti�t'`E ........s._,.`���....�.-.-..-.. 1 «�:' �` ensltxu ia'�•� �' - - - - - - - .aR:.,.ye,-ro .�t 7; A,s.a_� �- ."" _'... IN �, :-..�•+r-.:a` ';a»':>r•-,awi5 ••Epn Alm. . SyryE} V,F 'K.-(:u.-0't jF `rte.'v _ -_1•'?Ts ! .,Y T•':�.'�•`1;' r X5:9( ,y'-wt----f -•.--; --�...� .,i71t 6$lll . ;r/ 3F F0j Albert J. Krupski, Pregi&enf Town Hall James King,Vice-President 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-4899'(601 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only .—Co"tal Erosion Permit Application _,,'Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit ,Amendment/Transfer/Exiension _-o-ReceiV.ed.Application: OSS ,.eomplqke'd"Application Incorhpl&e SEORA6d�§sifcati�o�.-. E C' E U T_' yp�I ype'T 11 Unlisted T LCoordihitio'n.(date-sent) MAR 3 0 2005 -CAC Ref6rrdl Sent: _,Brrfteoflnspecfion: '11_?S11D Receipt of CAC Repo Seuliiuio Toren —Lead Agency Determination: Board of Trustees .Technical Review: clic Hearing Held. —Resolution: 4 Name of Applicant J14 L I Address F1 Rs Z-&Md Zd STREET, dEke' S41F Phone Number:( Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 7 Property Locati en rlAsTd- /nlm-t (provide LILCO Pole distance to cross streets; and location) AGENT:— 14�1A R E E (If applicable) Address:— S O R o R NX So Q T90 L 771 Phone: 31 — 7 Y22 o q ri�.iard of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): .06 ES (,q-? 5(d X.3• Area Zoning. h'1 ' R l of Previous use of property a,0 j rl of S To k 4 e�,of Intended use of property �j ,�/�/� -J`a Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date V No prior permits/approvals for site improvements Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspend54,5y a governmental agency? No Yes If yes, provide explanation. Project Description (use attachments if necessary)- (f6.d FIC yk-, D0 of 0 T- J- J- PAR ward of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations o 4 T S TD R i Area of wetlands on lot- square feet Percent coverage of lot % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet ' Does theproject involve excavation or filling? / No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited. feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations Manner in which material will be removed or deposited. Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate) BZo &r S To 46E s i sri��G �/sE J s nbard of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity Ro STD R ll L Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? V No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? ✓No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) PATRICIA C.MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel.(631)765-4330 Fax.(631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary April 25, 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay, LLC i SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find one return receipt card received this date on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, i Patricia-C.-Moore SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERYI ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete ignatu Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X4ti,, ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse Addressee so that we can return the card to you. BIA9ceivY Vtiqted Nam C. D e of elive ■ Attach this to the back of the mailpiece, or on the nt If space permits. 11 D. Is delivery address d'rfferent from Rem 1? Ye 1. Article Add to: If YES,a ter delivery a dress below: ❑No Daniel & Kimberly Petrie � V©Y (plZ, 723 N. Orange Avenue Fallbrook, CA 92028 3. Service Type Certified Mail ❑Express Mail Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?Prim Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number -- ()7srisler firom se ce fabeo 7004 2 510 0005 2376 9782 PSs Form 38111 Fe6rdary'2004i i i i r Domestic Return Receipt iozsss oz-M-1540 PATRICIA C.MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)765-4330 Fax.(631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary April 18, 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees Town of Southold nn Er j PO Box 1179 D V Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay,L9 APR 1 2005 SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 4 Dear Sir or Madam: SouiiiGid lb'-.-n Board of Trustees Enclosed please find two return receipt cards received this date on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I Ve truly yours, ffz Patricia C. Moore COMPLETESECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ mplete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signatur it m 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent ■ nt your name and address on the reverse K s that we can return the card to you. ■ Att h this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) Date of Delivery or the front if space permits. I. Art* le Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ❑Yes If Y7entelivery address below: ❑No Robins Island Holding Co.c/o •Moore Capital Mgmt 12511 Avenue of the Americas " New York, NY 10020 3. Service Type Certified Mail ❑Express Mail Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. f ---- --- 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) Yes 2. ArtiC4•• 'r • • i � t, , i I lit I k k! S t 4 i it IJ f f PS Forr 12595-02-M-1540 f PATRICIA C.MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road f Southold,New York 11971 Tel.(631)765-4330 Fax:(631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary April 15, 2005 Southold Town Board of Trustees 0 r� Town of Southold D i PO Box 1179 ' Southold, NY 11971 APR 1 9 2005 Re: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay, LL SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 Southold Town Board of Trustees Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a return receipt card received this date on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ve truly yours, Patricia C. Mq'ore PCM/vc ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A , • , Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you, , O gent ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B r' ed by Print d ) C. a e o ddrrl ssee or on the front ff space permits. ry 1• Article Addressed to: D. Is del"v address different from item 11 �I s -- If YES,enter delivery address below: XNo Philip Loria PO Box 15 New Suffolk, NY 11956 3. ice Type Certified Mail E3 Express Mail Registered ❑Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail 13 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delive m Fee) 2. Article Nu — -- 13 Yes (Transii3r lft w0 4. 28. — - ---, PS 20i i i , 102595-02-M-1540 — - --- — r 5 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: construct boat racks and parking area 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY I 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: April 2o, 2nn5 7 p.m. - You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC OWNERS NAME: c/o Patricia C. Moore, Esq. MAILING ADDRESS: 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PHONE#: 631-765-4330 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. i I l NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: construct boat racks and parking area 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: April 20, 2005 7 p.Tn• • You may-contact the Trustees Office at-765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC OWNERS NAME: c/o Patricia C. .Moore, Esq. MAII.,ING ADDRESS: 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PHONE#: 631-765-4330 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan.showing proposal for your•convenience. i s NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: construct boat racks and parking area 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: April 20, 2005 7 p.m. - You may contact-the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC OWNERS NAME: c/o' Patricia C. Moore, Esq. MAILING ADDRESS: 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PHONE#: 631-765-4330 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. j xErO STAT MAP OF PROPERTY A MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC. 1� N/OlF SITUATE AT _ NEW SUFFOLK FISHING STATION NEW SUFFOLK,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP SCTM:1 000-117-8-18 SCALE:V-4& . a • a A :JF F • 0 a ¢ O - - - -- - - - - - � � F7 ••"-.T. I • I w a 5 o� o MARJ STREET v z # 1 I. 784-2001 CMA � - I I acarm er "ted` - - _ P,���.•,C.r.,��noers 10-27-03 an��.o,r�•.o.n srrie 1" = 40' PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN COLOR LEGE" rorocnA.wiw"r�OExO • von-. wru�.. yam, �"'�'•�' roru rw .�onomy,•.�..•a LQT COVEAA(IE CR. J. N/O/F 1 of•� uoaw. �rru..= ••••...n I SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP �^'�` ..,nv. ,T"';;R�- mrawaun....- 1 ' n r, KING STREET MAP OF PROPERTY , MATT—A—MAR BY THE BAY, LLC. '! NFIS SITUATE AT NEW SUFFOLK FIs1m1G STATION NEW SUFFOLK;TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP SCTM:1000-117-8-18 SCALE:V-40' a �F • 0 1- S. ✓L • 0 �- — - - - - - - - � a� ...,. • Iz 00 O� i I En I o MAIN STREET ff4uo U z pbl F, �h raaRcr Ra 784-2001 oanm rr: CMA c"mm m _ PAAKtNO C&E ONS: wan w v vu-,v �m�Nov OOL 10-27-03' ....n. ..w.m 1• — 40' •� / 9QFT 11110 m.�-w4 PRELIMINARY o,wo SITE PLAN Itmq•-Wv/.m I COLO0.LEGEwf EPMICAL LEGEND mom w-Luau _•l.w:�ilYcla uv9vmsnwaa• 9Q1 IQ ♦ra+mm x.wnauw.av LOT COVERAGE CRRERIA: SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP u�m. *�.�®w .r mr.m. may. •�-„,vim. ivau+c"'.0 rwr°m�,su'ma..w”"r•I.vw�"'�n4ov�.a�.num�.:.+a..c m... ..u- PATRICIA C.MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)765-4330 Fax.(631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary April 11, 2005 C E V D , Southold Town Board of Trustees APR 1 3 2005 U Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold Town Southold, NY 11971 Board of Trustees Re: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay, LLC SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Mailing and the Affidavit of Posting for the above referenced project. Also enclosed are seven (7) return receipt cards received.to date. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Yatficia C. Moore PCM/vc Encs. PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ' ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS i 1 " Name: Address: t STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I. Vanessa Craigoresiding at 6995 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, -NY 11935 being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 7th day of April 20 05 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth.in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Southold , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered)mail. Sworn to before me this r N_ Day of RP/L i L , 20 w Notary Public MAR RET C. RUTKOWSIO Notary Public,State of New York No. 4982528 Qualmed I Commsioon EWM JUN S. iiVo 'J c Albert J. Krupski, P esident 0�. QG Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� 'f'� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster y - P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda v, Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone(631) 765-1892 �! `t►a Fax (631) 765-4366WY1 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of -----------------cz <<<c COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Michael Raynor , residing at 160 Inlet View East, Mattituck, NY 11952 being duly sworn depose and say: That on the 7 th day of Apr i 1 , 2005, I personally posted the property known as 1000-117-8-18 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY by placing the Bogard of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of Bearing noted thereon to be held C20 On. C� a Mcr Dated: April 7, 2005 (signature) Michael Raynor Sworn to before me this i7T14day ofAFA'(-200.' Notary PL911c MARGARET C. RUTKOWSIG Notary P No,aS9, ee oflk New Yo Qualified in Suffolk Commission Exph ee June 3r,,, 0 7 i NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLCSCTM# 1000-117-8-18 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: construct boat racks and parking area 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: April 20, 2005 7 p.m. • You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC OWNERS NAME: c/o Patricia C. Moore, Esq. MAILING ADDRESS: 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PHONE#: 1 631-765-4330 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. T RSO STRM MAP OF PROPERTY -MAR BY THE BAY, LLC. MATT-A N/O/F SITUATE AT New suPPOLic PrsNWo STATION NEW SUFFOLK,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW yORK LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP SCTM:1000.117-8-18 SCALE:V-40 ' ' ✓-' O J < 0O g- I •. • I o� a ZW I � I £Q MAW STREETol I I W 9 I U I �WA f3 II F14QT I, 784-2001 IDRNM�: .,:CMA 10--27-03 .s�.m 1• 40' Zt / PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN COLOR LEGENDFOGRA^11Cti LOEND +ecLLvruoamnrormm-m-�aasu 9RIT 11P. �..mamtiv .metn.twmm.xv vna[ruo IAT ODVERAOE CRIFERIA: I NIOIF SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP ,..�..co...n-�n,...,. w.,�;,,n,,•a+�s�a�„w,,,,•m�•,,��,e.,a..��Lu,.�an,,, ""'�•'""-"'�• - . NVIGHBOR LIST: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC New Suffolk, NY SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 1000-117-8-14.1 Daniel and Kimberly Petrie 1000-17-9-30 Theodosius W. Victoria 723 N. Orange Avenue 17250 Main Street Fallbrook, CA 92028 PO Box 218 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117-8-14.2 William C. Fisher 705 First Street 1000-17-9-31 George and Laura Maul PO Box 312 111 Hewlet Avenue New Suffolk, NY 11956 East Patchogue, NY 11772 1000-117-8-15 Dennis and Diane Harkoff as Trustees 120 Camp Mineola Rd,East Ext. PO Box 1269 Mattituck, NY 11952 100.0-117-8-16 Laura M. Advanet 925 First Street PO Box 149 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117-8-17 Philip Loria PO Box 15 New Suffolk, NY 11956 1000-117-8-19 Robins Island Holding Co. c/o Moore Capital Management 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 1000-17-8-21 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 1000-17-8-22 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 1000-17-8-23 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 F' d of Trustees Applicatiol AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I , k l L Idly "L )?f9 �&f.)3E residing .at P C). R O & y� (print ownerof property) (mailing address) y T C H do hereby authorize (Agent) to app y1 for� permit(s) from the Southold Board a Town Trustees on my behalf . -(Owner' s signature) 8 moard of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York fV PA T P I C I /g C . `'I') O (2 BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HISMER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS ' APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH F THIS APPLICATION. 7 Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3 Tl� DAY OF Al*ACpF 520 OS— otaryublic MARGARET C. RU'TKOWSIQ Notary Public,State of New York No. 4982528 Oual ied In Suffolk Count Commission Expires June 9.a 00 i PROJECT ID NUMBER 617.20 SEQR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1 APPLfe'fCNT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME ao -/n ,9y n1f L 3.PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality County S 4 PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map f 1 IRS TJ-- S ToeEf F ,J6'Iv s yFr° 4 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION ew ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6 DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY �o�I5T2uc�J�rf o � 13 19T 7 AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED- Initially acres Ultimately 3, S— acres 8 WILL P SED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? es ❑ No If no,describe briefly- 9 WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply) Residential ❑Industrial Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) 10 DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) rn(Yes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: T'9aSrEZS 11 DOES ANY ASP OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes f yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RES OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Arptrc'ant / Sponsor N e Date Signature If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617 4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF ❑ Yes 0 No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency ❑ Yes ❑ No C COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING.(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1 Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly- C2. rieflyC2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly- C3 rieflyC3 Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly- C4 rieflyC4 A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly- C6. rieflyC6. Longterm,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly C7 Other im acts(including chan es in use of either quanti or pe of energy? Explain briefl D WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA CEA)? If es,ex Iain briefl - Yes ❑No i E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes expIain: F1 Yes ❑No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and (f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance mustevaluate the potential impactof the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting the determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different rom responsible officer) APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics rohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The puroose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. n YOUR NAME: f I9 T 0� �. 6O.IC E— (Last name,first name,.riddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship.with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submittthis3 o� "0 J Signatu Print Name l C C 0O Form TS 1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 30, 2005 Board of Town Trustees D ` 4.G Town of Southold MAR 3 0 2005 53095 Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Lam--- Sou :'• u Southold, New York 11971-0959 6c,rd of T�°Siees RE: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay LLC. First & Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find Wetland Application and fee in the amount of$250.00 for the above project. If you have any questions, or require additional data, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore cc: Michael Raynor Southold Town Planning Board Encl's KING STREET MAP OF PROPERTY MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC. Nio�F SITUATE AT 7 v . NEW SUFFOLK FISHING STATION NEW SUFFOLK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (0 tj ,V SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1 LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP. " V \\\ SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 — -- a� RAC RAC RAC k7 #8 k9 � 1 SCALE: 1"=40' • . .- EXISTING RACK T RACK < SHOP 06 M10 O O O O O O O V1 ' K RACK E„y #1: r o HW o � RACK RACK 012 h� O W C7 O ° RACK F:\IeTI'v(i RACK EXISTING QUI, q3 BU I LDI',�(, I 3 1 ti2izRESTAURANT O O O O O 10111 rT RLA701'F� O \ FLACK FLACK C) 02 ( - 4 f j ` O 0 ( 1 U Vl rr^^ �l Vl \� RACK RACK <0 #t 015 tif J C a O � RAC CK FORK LIFT 8 O LOADING AREA t �. O S (�} MAIN STREET It f; V c r E n� O rn p OU0 U " �T'� •4 v AMS � UE g � r E € , ,. oS S P N SPAC S P NG ACE .4 c .1 U w AREA TO BE LANDNECESSARY E D IF NE [_, o FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING IF CESSARY v^♦ U ^ 1� I PROJECT N0: 784-2001 r WI DRAWN BY:le CMA L 6 6 y a b v v a CHECKED BY: z K > d a a PARKING CALCULATIONS: d - DATE: 17 BOAT RACKS @ 9 BOATS PER RACK-153 BOATS w I 153 BOATS-153 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 10-27-03 10 BOAT SLIPS @ I BOAT PER SLIP-10 BOATS SCALE: 10 BOATS-.11 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1" = 409 BOAT SHOP-1389 SQ.FT.-6 SPACES 1 SPACE PER 250 SQ.FT. SHEET ME:1569 SQ.FT.RESTAURANT-16 SPACES 1 SPACE PER 100 SQ.FT. TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED-185 SPACES PRELIMINARY PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SITE PLAN UNDER BOAT RACKS=45 SPACES OPEN SPACES-32 SPACES�2 HANDICAP OPEN SPACES(IAT#2)-106 SPACES I7 PARK G S CES COLOR LEGEND TOPOGRAPHICAL LEGEND TOTAL PARKING SPOTS PROVIDED-183+2 HANDICAP SHEET NO: NEW CONSTRUCTION TOTAL BTM#87.14 ABOVE MEAN LOW WATER(bI.W)AT CUTCHOGUE,NEW SUFFOLK HARBOR LOT COVERAGE CRITERIA: sr�REMOVED -5 69 ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL(MSL)AT SANDY HOOK NEW JERSEY TOTAL LOT SIZE(ABOVE MHW)-128,173 sq ft. �EXISTING 1.45 ADJUSTMENT TOTAL BUILDING AREA-2,533 sq.ft.m2% 1 of 1 TOPOGRAPHICAL N/O/F 1111111 BOARDWALKS,DOCKS,&PIERS LINES SHOWN DEPTH BELOW MEAN LOW WATER Existing Stooge Building-393 sq.ft. SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP. LINES SHOW ELEVATIONS ABOVE NEAN SEA LEVEL AT SANDY HOOK,NEW JERSEY Existing Restsursnt&Ramps-1,940 sq.ft. SITE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY PREPARED BY WALLACE T.BRYAN-LISCENCED LAND SURVEYOR - TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION IS BASED ON PLAN PREPARED BY HOLZMACHER,MCLENDON&MURRELL,P.C. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA