Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
FEAF Supporting Narratives & Data
VINEYARD VIEW FEAF Supporting Narratives & Data Date: 2/28/2018 Applicant: Vineyard View, LLC 1000 University Avenue—Suite 500 Rochester, New York 14607 (585)324-0500 Location of Project: s/side of County Road 48(North Road), 1600'+/-Chapel Lane Greenport, New York 11944 SCTM: 1000-040.00-03.00-001.000 L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 The project known as "Vineyard View" is to be located on County Road 48 (CR 48 aka North Road) in the unincorporated portion of the hamlet of Greenport, approximately 2 miles from the central downtown are of the incorporated Village of Greenport. The site itself treed and undeveloped. It is bound by CR 48 to the north, a vacant parcel to the east, and surrounded on all other sides by a very large parcel owned by the Village of Greenport. The Village land (approximately 192 acres) is largely undeveloped. The portion of the property directly adjacent to the site is part of the Moore's Drain freshwater wetlands area; the eastern portion of this property contains Village facilities such as the sewage treatment plant and recreational fields. The property (17.19 acres or 748,703 SF) is zoned "HD"—Hamlet Density. The scope of the project consists of developing approximately 7.2 acres of the 17.19 acre site, and preserving all of the 3.8 acres of natural wetlands. The general nature of the proposed action (D1-a) will be to construct a 50-unit affordable housing development modelled after a village square, with community building, communal play & recreation areas, and on-site parking lot while retaining the parcel's characteristic freshwater wetlands and open space. The building designs will be inspired by architectural styles typical in the existing surrounding community. This development will serve the housing needs of the Town of Southold by adding to the currently limited workforce housing stock. It is important to contrast the current proposal with the prior proposal known as Northwind Village, The previously proposed Northwind Village consisted of 128 units and a proposed annexation to the Village of Greenport, presumably due to the extent of non-conformance with the Town of Southold's Zoning Code. The 128-unit proposal consisted of the creation of 3.5 acres of impervious surfaces, included buildings, and the preservation of 10.54 acres of land, 5.8 acres of which was forest. The current Vineyard View proposal is 50 units within 2.9 acres of impervious surfaces and preserves 11.1 acres of land, 6.2 acres of which is forest. Vineyard View, as proposed, conforms to all aspects of the Town's Zoning Code, notably those concerning density and open space. Based on the existing demographics of the Town of Southold as indicated in the 2013 American Community Survey, the Vineyard View development would accommodate a population of approximately 118 people, which is just .5% of the Town's population. While impacts to sanitary flow, solid waste generation and traffic have all been calculated to be in the 1- 2%range above existing quantities,this is far less than half of the impacts that would have been generated by the prior proposal of 128 units. Furthermore, as there exists a demand within the existing residential population for this type of workforce housing, it is more likely than not that the residents of the proposed Vineyard View community will be existing Southold residents, young people re-locating from situations such as living with family. As such, the impacts on the Town's transportation and environmental infrastructure are anticipated to be minimal. The NYSDEC was the lead agency reviewing an EIS for the larger Northwind Village and issued a Findings Statement that permitted that project to proceed. In planning Vineyard View the development team carefully reviewed the DEIS, FEIS and the Findings Statement of the Northwind Village proposal to avoid environmental impacts and incorporate appropriate mitigative measures where indicated. In developing the current Vineyard View proposal special attention was paid to addressing the 11 stated reasons supporting the prior Positive Declaration (Refer to Appendix A). These the concerns are addressed as follows: 1. A geotechnical firm was hired to perform soil borings and to prepare a full geotechnical report. The soil borings logs are included as drawing E2 in the Site Plan Submission Set. The currently L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 1 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 proposed building footprints occupy far less of the site than before, and are being engineered for site-specific conditions. The site drainage designs have been advanced far beyond a typical site plan submission and are included in the Site Plan Submission Set as sheets D1-D2. Where necessary, unsuitable material will be removed from the site. 2. The construction for this project will consist of one phase only. While it is anticipated total start to finish may be 18 months, allowing for all regulatory inspections and sign-offs, it is more likely that project construction time will be approximately 14 months. Of that 14 months, only approximately 6 months of that would be exterior work consisting of minimal environmental impacts. 3. Due to the scaled-back proposal at hand, clustering of development, reduction of impervious surfaces and increased environmental buffers, it is unlikely the current proposal even requires a NYSDEC Freshwater Permit. It is noted that a 2005 wetlands survey was accepted and acknowledged by the NYSDEC during the review of the prior Northwind Village proposal; since then, Gary Gentile, RLA, of L.K. McLean Associates has verified this delineation and made some minor adjustments to the line to ensure stricter conformance to the wetlands mapping statutes contained with NYS Environmental Law and the Town's wetland regulations promulgated in Chapter 275. Mr. Gentile's credentials include over 40 years of involvement with wetlands delineations within the State of New York and are included within Appendix A attached,with both the 2005 survey and the 2017 delineation. 4. The current Vineyard View proposal will connect to the Village of Greenport Sewer District as an out-of-district connection. No discharge permits will be required. 5. The anticipated sanitary flow of 12,500 gpd is less than 2% of the currently permitted capacity (650,000 gpd) of the Village of Greenport treatment plant, and as such, a letter certifying existing capacity has been obtained and included within Appendix B of this submission. 6. A letter certifying availability from the Suffolk County Water Authority, who will serve the site, is being included 7. The prior NYSDEC Findings (included in Appendix A) indicate that the previous proposal for 128- units successfully balanced on all legal criteria necessary for the protection environment and the need to accommodate social and economic considerations. The Vineyard View proposal does more to protect threatened species by preserving more natural habitat. 8. The prior NYSDEC Findings (included in Appendix A) indicate that the previous proposal for 128- units successfully balanced on all legal criteria necessary for the protection environment and the need to accommodate social and economic considerations. The Vineyard View proposal does more to protect all wildlife and plant species by preserving more natural habitat. 9. The existing site does not contain any significant historical or cultural resources,and this has been verified in a letter from the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYS SHPO) dated November 17, 2017. (Included in Appendix C. Public Resources) 10. As discussed above, the population increase associated with the proposed development will be less than a .5%increase to the Town's existing population,thereby indicating that any impacts on community services will be minimal. 11. It is no longer being considered to remove the subject 17.2 acre parcel from the Town of Southold and annex it to the Village of Greenport. L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 2 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 For all of the reasons outlined in the preceding paragraph,the proposed Vineyard View development is a sensitive, balanced proposal which carefully considers impacts to the existing community. The development is in harmony with the surrounding area which is mixed-use, and there are no adopted land use plans which provide specific recommendations for the parcels use or conservation(C2). The proposed action is not a subdivision (D1-d) and will not be constructed in multiple phases (D1-e). The project does not include any new non-residential construction (D1-g). Across the street from the parcel is primarily single-family residential homes, which are located on Long Island Sound, but the surrounding area features a few multi-residential developments, as well as motels, resorts, and an assisted living facility. The site development will include a community building, a playground, communal outdoor recreation areas and on-site parking,while retaining the parcel's characteristic freshwater wetlands and open space. The building designs will be inspired by architectural styles typical in the existing surrounding community. This development will serve the workforce housing needs of the Town of Southold by adding to the existing limited housing stock serving the younger and elder populations of the Town. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose of the Hamlet Density Zone as detailed in Town Code §280-20. The accessory buildings (community building and maintenance shed) support the overall residential development of the property(D1-g),and are permitted under§280-20.C.of the Zoning Code. Please refer to the Site Plan Drawing S-1; a Site Data Table, a Building Summary Table, a Dwelling Unit Summary Table (including Parking Calculations), and a Parking Lot Landscaping Table have been provided to illustrate zoning compliance. The site is in a natural state, and has not previously been developed. Freshwater wetlands associated with Moore's Drain and Pipes Cove occupy a portion of the site, and have been delineated (D2-b.i.). The proposed development has been designed in a manner that is sensitive to the wetlands by not encroaching upon them. The site designs retain a 100' natural buffer between the proposed development activity and the wetlands (D2-b.ii.),which will be further augmented by an additional elective 10' planted buffer(delineated by the 10' open space setback line depicted in the Site Plan Drawing Set),for a total of 110'from the as-built development to the wetlands. As such,the proposed development will not infringe upon the area regulated under New York State Freshwater wetlands regulations, nor will it cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment upon the wetlands or adjacent area. The proposed development is "clustered" to maximize preserved open space and to allow for landscaped areas that will minimize loss of wildlife habitat. As a result of these site design features,the development will not encroach directly on the wetlands(D2-b.ii.). The proposed development is sensitive to the Town's zoning and environmental regulations which support a high quality of life for neighboring residents and support habitat preservation. Every attempt will be made to construct the proposed structures with minimal disturbance to the soil structure and without reliance on de-watering (D2-a). Based on site investigations, it is anticipated that the buildings can be constructed on spread footings with some engineered fill brought to site. Any materials imported to the site will come from well-documented clean sources and be tested and inspected to ensure they are clean materials. At this point, the majority of development is situated on the portion of the site with the maximum distance from the groundwater table. As such, de-watering is not anticipated to be necessary (D2-a.iv.). Should the need for de-watering by means of well points occur, the required permit applications and design documents will be submitted to the NYSDEC for a water withdrawal permit, any conditions of which will be followed. L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 3 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 While the proposed development will create new demands for water and sewage treatment of liquid wastes(D.2.-c,d),the design will be LEED certified and to the maximum extent possible, use measures like low-flow fixtures to reduce the anticipated per capita water usage and liquid waste generated. The proposed action will be supplied with public water (not containerized), natural gas for water heating, electric (general residential and residential heating use) and have an out-of-district sewer connection to the Greenport Sewer District (Refer to Appendix B for availability letters from Suffolk County Water Authority and Greenport Sewer District, as well as electric and natural gas load letters). The new apartment building will generate approximately 12,500 gallons/day of residential sanitary wastewater (225 GPD/unit x 36 units 600-1200SF; 300 GPD/units over 1200SF x 14; 150GPD for Community Building) (D.2.-d). Landscaping irrigation systems, which cover just a portion of the site, will feature rain sensors and be configured to minimize water usage; this is in addition to the inclusion of native plants in the landscaping design which will lessen the need for irrigation (Refer to Planting and Irrigation Plans included in Site Plan Drawing Set). Based on a seasonal watering schedule of 1 hour/day, every other day, and excluding rain days, it is anticipated that the irrigation system will consume approximately 1,000 gallons/day. Totaling the general residential water use and the irrigation use,the water usage for the site is anticipated to be 13,500 gallons per day. There is a water main of adequate size to service the proposed action and thus no extension or capacity expansions are necessary to supply this project. As defined in the LEAF the approximate daily water usage for this project is estimated to be 13,500 gallons/day (D.2.-c.). This has been estimated based on the sanitary calculations, with an allowance added for water use, such as drinking water and landscaping irrigation that would not be included in those estimates. The project would require a 4" domestic water service and a dedicated 6" fire line service for the apartment building's fire suppression system. The estimated demand for each of the water services is roughly 350 gallons/minute for the fire line and 150 gallons per minute for domestic purposes. The applicant will schedule a hydrant pressure test or obtain historical information for the purpose of designing a fire suppression system. If adequate pressure is not available from the Suffolk County Water Authority's water main on CR 48, a booster pump would be included in the design of the sprinkler system. While the proposed action will disturb more than one acre and generate new stormwater runoff(D.2.-e), the stormwater management plan preserves existing area runoff flow patterns, both to ensure adequate recharge to existing wetlands, as well as to protect nearby properties from any flooding impacts. The stormwater management design for the site will be developed in accordance with the Town of Southold's land development requirements as outlined in various chapters of the Town Code, including, but not limited to Chapter 280 Zoning and Chapter 236 Stormwater Management. The drainage design relies on design criteria contained within the 2015 NYSDEC Stormwater Management Design Manual, and fully incorporate the Six-Step Process for Stormwater Site Planning and Practice Selection described in Section 3.6 of the manual. The site is additionally subject to the Town's New York State-approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan and will be developed in a manner that is consistent with NYS Coastal Management policies. The recommended provisions of the NYSDEC-recom mended Stormwater Site Planning steps are being incorporated into the design process. Over 10 acres of the 17 acre site, or over 50%, of the site will be maintained in its natural state; and the design works with the natural topography and existing flow paths. L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 4 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 The Water Quality Volume and the Town's stormwater storage requirements will be met via a combination of runoff reduction techniques, grey infrastructure and green infrastructure. The proposed site features plantings and landscaping on a significant portion of the developed site,which will minimize impervious cover and ensure that the design's runoff reduction volume exceeds the NYSDEC standards for treating the Water Quality Volume. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), as well as Erosion and Sediment Control Plans will be part of the stormwater management materials developed to protect adjacent wetlands from development impacts (D.2.-b). Various approved runoff reduction techniques, including the preservation of a 100' naturally vegetated buffer area, the creation of an additional 10' vegetated area abutting natural buffer, and best management practices are used where possible to meet site's storage volume requirement as set forth by the Town and NYSDEC criteria. To maximize sensitivity to the surrounding environment, the stormwater conveyance and storage system consists of a combination of grey and green infrastructure practices. Grey infrastructure practices include traditional precast concrete leaching basins, manholes and pipes to capture, convey and store runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces. Green infrastructure practices supplement the storage capacity of the grey infrastructure via the use of grass swales, bio-swales/raingardens,and pervious pavers. Of particular note is the existing runoff from County Road 48. Using green infrastructure techniques, this existing runoff will be treated and allowed to recharge the adjacent wetlands. By continuing to allow this external runoff to follow existing flow patterns, the pre-development hydrologic conditions will be maintained by preserving the water budget of the current natural habitats. In tandem with finalizing the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), pre-and post-construction stormwater design analysis calculations will be completed. Should the analysis reveal the need to provide channel protection or peak rate control practices to prevent downstream erosion or water quality impacts, best management practices will be utilized to meet NYSDEC requirements. All of this will be documented in a SWPPP which will follow all applicable Town and State guidelines to preserve pre- development hydrologic conditions for the adjacent wetlands. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (with details) has been developed to control the migration of sediment during construction, and protect adjacent wetlands from the effects of construction activity. Inspectors with NYSDEC certification for erosion and sediment control will monitor construction. This will ensure adherence to all environmental regulations, and that best management practices for soil and erosion control are properly installed and maintained. Site inspections will occur in accordance with the SPDES General Permit for stormwater discharges from construction activity(GP-0-15-002)which requires both regularly scheduled inspections as well as inspections immediately after significant rainfalls to ensure the integrity of controls. The proposed action, residential apartments, will not generate any air emission sources (D2-G) nor will the proposed action generate or emit methane gas (D2-H). The project will not result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes. During the limited construction phase of the proposed action, it is anticipated there will be times when noise will exceed existing ambient noise levels (D2-M). The existing amount of treed areas to be preserved will help mitigate construction noise, and are identified on the Site Plan. Prior to the start of any construction activity, the developer will measure existing noise to obtain the existing ambient noise levels and provide a logistics plan to the Town that L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 5 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 addresses specifics of their noise control operation. In general, they will monitor noise levels during construction, compared to the existing ambient noise level. The developer will control when levels due to construction activity will be exceeded through careful means and methods (equipment, scheduled timing of certain operations,specific locations of noise generating activity)and will look to minimize noise levels from exceeding the existing ambient noise levels. Vineyard View will not result in a substantial increase to traffic above present levels or generate a substantial new demand for transportation facilities or services (D.2.-j.). As previously stated, the site is located on the south side of CR48,approximately one-half mile east of Chapel Lane and one half mile west of Moores Lane. In the vicinity of the site, CR48 provides two lanes, one eastbound lane and one westbound lane,with 7 foot wide asphalt shoulders on each side.The posted speed limit is 50mph.Traffic volume information obtained from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) indicates that the Average Annual Daily Traffic volume on CR48 is 12307 vehicles per day, based on data collected during July of 2015. A single site access driveway onto CR48 is proposed. The driveway will provide two lanes, one for entering traffic and one for exiting traffic, controlled by a stop sign for the northbound driveway approach. L.K. McLean Associates has performed preliminary trip calculations based on the site development proposal that indicate only minimal increases in vehicular traffic over the existing conditions on CR 48. Although the increase in traffic will be minimal, in the interest of providing a thorough understanding of the project's potential impacts,we offer the following additional information. Documentation referred to in the discussion is attached to this submission: 1. Information contained in the report"Trip Generation" (10th edition), indicates that the proposed fifty (50) residential units will generate a total of 30 new vehicle trips (8 entering and 22 exiting) during the weekday AM peak hour, 34 new vehicle trips (20 entering and 14 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour,and 21 new trips(11 entering and 10 exiting)during the Saturday midday peak hour. Note that these trip generation estimates consider the peak hours of traffic generation for the proposed land use, which is a low-rise multi-family residential development in a suburban setting.Thus, a worst case estimate is presented. Supporting documentation is attached. 2. The trip generation estimates represent an increase in traffic volumes on CR48 of slightly more than 2%, which is well below established threshold criteria for the necessity to perform detailed traffic impact analysis. However, to ensure that the proposed access point will provide the necessary capacity unsignalized intersection capacity analyses were conducted at the intersection of the proposed access driveway at CR48. The results of these analyses indicate that the intersection will provide more than adequate capacity to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand during all three peak hours analyzed,the weekday AM, PM and weekend composite peak hour. Copies of the computer outputs are provided in the attached traffic documentation. 3. The traffic volumes utilized in the capacity analyses were collected during peak summer months and factored to reflect the 2019 build year for the proposed development, using an annual growth factor of two percent(2%).The annual growth factor is based on projections in the Suffolk County Comprehensive Plan 2035. The peak hour traffic volumes were further factored to reflect L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 6 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 significant platooning of vehicles on westbound CR48 during arrival times for the Cross Sound Ferry at the Orient Point ferry terminal.When the ferry arrives at Orient Point,vehicles disembark in a steady stream, and travel west on NYS Route 25. By the time they arrive at the vicinity of the proposed development, platoons of vehicles have formed in the westbound traffic stream. The impact of this platooning effect results in increased delays approximately 40 seconds per vehicle for vehicles attempting to leave the proposed site driveway during these times. However, adequate storage is provided on the site driveway to accommodate the small number of exiting vehicles seeking to turn left onto CR48. 4. The location of the site ingress/egress has been selected to ensure that vehicles entering and exiting the proposed development will be able to do so in a safe and timely manner. More than adequate intersection and stopping sight distance will be available for safe operation of the access driveway. For a design speed of 50mph, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials publication "A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (often referred to as the Green Book), indicates that 425 feet of stopping sight distance (for vehicles travelling on CR48) and 555 feet of intersection sight distance (for vehicles exiting the site driveway)should be provided for safe operation. Sight distance measurements conducted on CR48 at the proposed driveway location indicate that over 700 feet of sight distance is available to the west, and over 1000 feet of sight distance is available to the east, well above the AASHTO guidelines for 50mph. Note that the available sight distance is in fact sufficient to allow safe operations for a design speed of 70mph. 5. In connection with a previous application for development of the subject property, a Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates (Dunn study) in 2009. The proposed development at that time envisioned 128 condominium units. As part of that study a review of traffic accidents, (now referred to as "crashes" in the traffic engineering profession), indicated that the crash experience in the vicinity of the site was minimal. In the three (3) years examined (2204 through 2006) in the Dunn study,forty four(44) crashes occurred on CR48 between Chapel Lane and Moores Lane, 27 of which were deer strikes (61%). Thus, 17 crashes occurred that did not involve deer. The Dunn study noted that, with the exception of the high number of deer strikes, no trends or patterns in the crash occurrence was evident. Updated crash data obtained from NYSDOT for the most recent three (3)year period available (2014 through 2017) indicates that no significant changes in crash occurrence have taken place. During the current three-year period, 54 crashes occurred, 35 of which were deer strikes (64%). No patterns or trends in crash occurrence are evident. Of the remaining 19 crashes, there were four right angle crashes,three rear end crashes,two bike crashes, one pedestrian crash,4 fixed object crashes, all of which struck different objects, three left turn, one right turn, one overtaking and one head on crash. Note that based on the AADT and number of crashes, the rate of crash occurrence for this section of CR48 was 1.23 crashes per million vehicle miles travelled, which is below the statewide average rate of 2.21 crashes per million vehicle miles travelled for two lane undivided highway facilities in New York. In light of the minimal amount of new traffic expected to be generated by the current proposed development of 50 units, and the well-designed access point, no adverse impact to the safe L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 7 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 operation of the roadway network is anticipated. Updated crash data is provided as an attachment.The applicant is willing to participate in any program the SCDPW might undertake to reduce the number of deer strikes along CR48 in the vicinity of the project site, including installation of additional deer warning signs. 6. The Dunn study also noted that, due to the poor condition of the shoulders on CR48, westbound vehicles on CR48 would have difficulty in passing vehicles waiting to turn left from CR48 into the site driveway. The study indicates that the applicant at that time was willing to install a left turn lane on westbound CR48 for left turns into the site. In light of the fact that SCDPW has recently rehabilitated CR48, including the shoulders, and that the current proposed development will generate less than half the amount of traffic that examined under the Dunn study, no westbound left turn lane on CR48 is needed to accommodate the small number of left turning vehicles into the site. 7. Suffolk County Transit provides bus service to the North Fork.The S-92 bus route travels between Orient Point on the North Fork and Montauk on the South Fork. However, the designated route is along Main Road (NYS Route 25), a considerable walking distance from the site.Therefore, use of the SC Transit service cannot be expected to help reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the site. The Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) provides passenger rail service to the North Fork of Long Island. The nearest station on the LIRR Main Line is located in the Village of Greenport. The LIRR has recently agreed to increase North Fork service, including to the Greenport station. To support this increased train service, the LIRR has requested that the Towns provide "last mile" transportation between the LIRR stations and local origins and destinations.The applicant is ready to support this effort by the town by providing access to the site for any shuttle or trolley service proposed in this regard,and is willing to accommodate a pickup/drop off location within the site. Note that use of this shuttle service would also accommodate residents of the proposed development that might travel to and from downtown Greenport for other employment or recreational purposes. 8. The Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) has permitting authority on the County roadway. SCDPW has recently completed a rehabilitation project on CR48 which includes the portion of CR48 in front of the proposed development. Shoulders were rehabilitated, the roadway was resurfaced, and new pavement markings were applied.A highway work permit will be obtained from SCDPW to allow the construction of the access point to the County highway.All requirements of the permit application will be met, and any mitigation requested by the County will be provided by the applicant. 9. In 2017, the Town of Southold, at the request of the Village of Greenport, issued a Request for proposals (RFP) to provide a traffic study to evaluate the existing conditions and develop improvement strategies for the reconfiguration of the intersection of CR48 and Main Street(State Route 25) in an effort to improve pedestrian safety while implementing traffic calming initiatives. It is our understanding that this RFP was withdrawn. However, it must be noted that the volume of traffic generated by the proposed development will have an insignificant impact on that intersection location. L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 8 of 9 VINEYARD VIEW FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM—SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVES REVISION DATE 2/28/2018 With respect to "parking" as a component of this project, the site plan demonstrates compliance with Town Code §280-78, Off-street parking areas. The ninety-seven (97) parking stalls provided correspond to the code's provisions for multiple dwelling units; additional parking stalls, seven (7) constructed and seven (7) land-banked, have been provided in the vicinity of the community building. (Please refer to Site Plan Drawing S-1.) It is noted that the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication "Parking Generation", 4t" Edition indicates that the anticipated average peak demand for 50 dwelling units is 81 parking stalls. As such,the parking provided exceeds typical engineering practice,as well as all applicable local codes. The developer recognizes,and is respectful of the NYSDOT Scenic By-ways designation (E.3.-h.). The most scenic part of the area vista lies to the north of the roadway, and any impacts created by the proposed development will be low. It is important to understand that the existing natural topography of the area slopes from the waterfront down towards the south end of the site,which mitigates any potential impacts to the viewshed. The maximum true height of any proposed building is 25', measured to the top ridge peak. This is comparable to the height of a single family home. Due to the sloping grade of the property, the first floor elevation of the buildings will be below the grade of the roadway. As such,the roof peak of the community building will be approximately 16'above the existing crown of roadway,and the roof peak of the dwelling unit buildings closest to the roadway will be roughly 15' above the existing crown of the roadway. In regards to the development itself, a full-landscaping plan, including street trees, is being developed to maintain the natural beauty of the area. All guidelines contained within the Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan will be adhered to help preserve the rural characteristic of this segment of CR 48. Building design will be in keeping with traditional building types historically present in the nearby hamlet areas so that any portion of buildings visible from roadway will appear in keeping with existing community development patterns. Exterior lighting will be energy efficient and installed in strict accordance with the Town Code (Chapter 280-117). The applicant will prepare an updated Lighting Plan (including photometric survey of site) that will meet the Town standards(defined in Chapter 280). All exterior lighting will be"Dark Skies"compliant —facing downward and contained on-site. The project is designed in a manner to preserve the natural resources and habitats existing on the parcel (E.2.). The coordinated SEAR review for the prior development proposal, Northwind Village, identified significant plant and animal communities to be protected. (Refer to Appendix A for copy of prior NYSDEC Findings) Those were the Eastern Box Turtle, the Sharp-Skinned Hawk, Cooper's Hawk, and successional old field southern hardwood forest habitats (E.2.-n). None of these species is considered endangered or threatened by either the federal government or New York State (E.2.-o), however, the three animal species are listed by NYS as "species of special concern" (E.2.-p). Prior findings by the NYSEC recommended mitigation actions such as preserving as much as the natural habitat as possible. This was the most significant of their recommended mitigation actions, and it has been incorporated in the development proposal. Of particular significance is that the current site plan preserves over 50% of the existing habitat of these species. The drastically reduced density of this proposal, and clustered plan of the buildings, reduces the opportunities for human presence and activity to disrupt these animal communities. L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX A NATURAL RESOURCES 1. LKMA Wetlands Delination 2. Gary Gentile, RLA, Credentials 3. KACE LI 2005 Wetlands Survey 4. FEMA Flood Map 5. USGS Groundwater Map 6. NRCS Soil Map 7. NYSDEC Natural Communities Map 8. NYS Priority Water Bodies List 9. 2011 Northwind Village NYSDEC Findings Statement 10. NYSDEC Reasons Supporting Prior SEQRA Determination L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. MATCH PROPERTY OF #s KACE L1,LLC L(,CAfFD AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e 1 rcrn.�a�aaa-a,am-asaa-aaeaaa SURROLK COUNTY,NEWYORK AREA = 748,703± SORT. OR 17.188± ACRES 0. 3. w.m 0 / � 79/ - �� d6//3EVE \ wry h ®� 11 u e� 1 \n 1 _Ill � lL 1 2.4t'I�U9•� ��Y, I h erecweR��irvc� s,c,xn Lrro wi-o so cob co-aaccoi \ - FRESRwn w TAL.Y'LL T � 1 _ /p y EreBc GARY GENTILE,R of LKTLA.� m .. Lan ssonafa,P.C. Q\\ I m Ste. _ ry LEGEND - F__....... nur wrnc o aze rernrenmr � 4 onurr vn/e C5 wa rez vacve umncarzn�n wArc�P ® cnrcw aim v cnncreaRo cnANnc o co,��zoc vo NnrE �\ _ a _.. vcrCavn aae -�- vcrcnNac � \ . 1 ® _. nnrewa cncAncm v \ 1 v n�nsureeraENv,aaem Rccoeoamce wrrKu.,..,raNnaac�. - L 1 3. eErericat oa oA'nsaEF<aErre Ec ro na`scENri E.aAu oFreo�ucH Ea vcaaaerc�..s. -�mN 6/- '••m�//k�� I FssacU.rE,s,PC.oN ocrosEv n,zon 8�2(0 __ 1 —� 1 �.Ew�oreKsr,,EEnn�„��w woFSE�r,I„�,s✓ao,.�o�r�r„E `���__J y REVISIONS roaoomo,ra_m,,rvunous av sueseQuevro,vnee.,. ”`"orrrea�srrreao.r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e. rer.vrs GF wavnorsnow.,a�Norcc-Fr,F,Ec. Suffolk Couxity, New York e, rsmuEvaoses w,r„_saru,uv VINEYARD VIEW NORTH RD., GREENPORT WETLANDS DELINEATION L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. GRAPHIC SCALE CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS gg'ITA�nTl 11L-1-1 437 SO.COUNTNT R—,BROCKHAIAEN,NEW YORKI out.o_ ,moo"_®m X L�P.J, ]B Il LKARAGARY GENTILE , R.L.A. Senior Landscape Architect Mr.Gentile was a Senior Landscape Architect with NYS Department of Transportation for Education 39 years. Gary supervised up to six people charged with the review of Region 10 and AS,Ornamental Horticulture, NYS University at Farmingdale, 1966 Region 11 landscape programs. He was also responsible for wetland mitigation,planting plans, historic and cultural resource programs and review,topsoil analysis, highway work BLA, Landscape Architecture, permit review, nursery inspection of landscape plant materials, the evaluation of noise University of Georgia, 1969 wall installation, invasive species, bikeway design and construction, historic parkway design issues, sediment and erosion control, ADA requirements, native plant species, Registrations permitting (NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Permits and Mitigation and Licensed Landscape Architect, US Army Corp. of Engineers Wetland Permits and Mitigation Plans), and coordination New York, 1974 with the Long Island Pine Barrens Commission. US Soil Conservation,Soil & His experience over the past 39 years included tidal wetland evaluations, design, Erosion Control Certification installation, monitoring, and restoration efforts. During his career he has supported US Army Corp.of Engineers and conducted wetland seminars in New York and New Jersey. His work with Wetland Delineation Certification innovative materials include geotextiles, GRES system (Geotextile reinforced earth system), gabions, erosion control blankets, bio-logs, pyramats, and new nursery NYS Native Plant Species Expert planting techniques (planting pallets, bare root, planting cells, plant rescue, etc.) Certification Gary's professional training in the wetlands field includes Wetland Policies in Bioengineering Training& Transportation Projects, Managing and Protecting Long Island Wetlands, FHWA WET- Implementation Certification II training, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Course with Ralph Tiner, Ecological Construction for Wetlands, Designing Stormwater Wetlands, New York International Erosion Control Association Certification State Erosion and Sediment Control Training for Designers. Representative project experience includes the following: Certified Preparer of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans,2008 Stormwater Quality Improvements, Nessenger Chevrolet Site: Under a NY State Environmental Facilities Corporation Grant for the Town of Brookhaven, LKMA Professional Awards developed plans and procured environmental permits for stormwater quality NY Historical Preservation Award improvements at the site of a former Chevrolet dealer in Patchogue. In addition to (NYSOPRHP—2001) establishing a wet meadow for stormwater treatment prior to its entering the adjacent Swan River, a passive-use park was created. A maintenance road was constructed of Member of Design Team permeable pavement. A bio-retention basin was constructed to accommodate awarded Federal Highway drainage from the proposed access road and parking area, and included the Administration 2005 Environmental Excellence Award restoration of native wetlands vegetation. The original streambed of the Swan River was re-established. Gary served as lead landscape architect and was responsible for NYSDOT"Wayne McCready" the development of proposed wetland planting plans, details and specifications. Environmental Innovation and Stewardship Award (2006) Bay Shore Mill Pond,Town of Islip: LKMA developed plans for the creation of a new pond adjacent to Penataquit Creek and Southside Hospital in downtown Bay Shore. Statewide Engineer of the Year, Construction of the pond required mitigation of contaminated soils, sediment NYS Association of sampling and analysis and disposal of the contaminated material at a facility off Long Transportation Engineers(2007) Island. The pond incorporated features such as native wetland and upland plantings, safety benches, boulders, bio-logs and outfalls into the existing fish ladder north of Montauk Highway. Gary's responsibilities included development of wetland planting plans, details and specifications and on-site inspections of the contractor's planting operations. LKARAGARY GENTILE , R.L.A. Senior Landscape Architect NYS Route 110 Reconstruction – Drainage Improvements, Huntington (NYSDOT): This project evaluated the development of feasible alternatives for roadway and significant drainage improvements on a 0.9 mile section of NYS Route 110 (New York Avenue) in the vicinity of Huntington Harbor. The project area suffers from several contributing factors that create a complex flooding situation, including low and nearly flat elevations of the roadway; steep grade of the surrounding area; a 3,500 acre watershed area; high groundwater table; influence of tidal action due to proximity of the Huntington Bay; and significant development of the area and the stream parallel to Rte. 110. Gary's responsibilities including landscape plans,wetland plantings and development of details for a vegetated filter and proposed stormwater wetland designed to treat runoff from Route 110. The project was awarded an "Evergreen" rating—the highest possible rating under NYSDOT's GreenLITES (Green Leadership In Transportation Environmental Sustainability)," a transportation environmental sustainability rating program. The project was constructed in 2015. Oakland Lake Park Restoration: Restoration Specialist on this New York City Department of Environmental Protection project in Bayside. Responsible for the re- building of the natural drainage features and re-planting native vegetation at Oakland Lake. The project includes the repairs of five locales near Oakland Lake and Ravine, and is one phase of a $25 million program to provide improved stormwater management and flood mitigation for the area. Due to the nature of this site and project, field revisions were required to address conditions unforeseen in the design stages. This required expertise in arboriculture, agronomy, landscape horticulture, plant science, entomology, plant pathology, and ecology to restore and mitigate the negative impacts over the years. Oversaw the restoration of grasslands and indigenous plants along Northern Boulevard that have been removed during construction. Supervised all restoration work performed by the Contractor, including the ongoing implementation of the project's soil erosion control plan (2009-10). Seaside Landscape Design for Flight 800 at Smith Point Beach Park: Development of a memorial site for the families of the victims on the barrier beach with a seaside arboretum. Coordinated all construction, plant installation and permits. Riverhead Yacht Club Bulkhead Permit: Site assessment and the development of a tidal wetland plant for the bulkhead replacement. Evaluation of the tidal wetlands and delineation of wetlands for NYSDEC. Twin Culvert Replacement at Cold Spring Harbor Fish Hatchery and NYS Route 2SA: Wetland impact mitigation was required for working within the tidal wetland buffer and to stabilize the bridge slope at the tidal wetlands. Gabions were used with the GRES wall and native species to satisfy NYSDEC concerns. Ocean Parkway State Parkway Dune Stabilization and Beach Grass Planting:This project was designed to help prevent the Atlantic from breaching through Ocean Parkway into the Great South Bay. Work has been done at this location numerous times after winter storms have impacted the shoreline and removed stabilizing vegetation. Special plantings and snow fence installations were installed to capture sand laden winds, before build-ups appeared in the eastbound side of Ocean Parkway. LKARAGARY GENTILE , R.L.A. Senior Landscape Architect ITS Installation Within the Tidal Wetlands of Meadowbrook State Parkway: The impacts of the fiber optics system along the parkway required a NYSDEC permit along with mitigation. By careful design and placement of the underground system, tidal wetland impacts were avoided and mitigation limited to erosion stabilization work items. Dam Pond Channel Shoreline Stabilization: Severe wind and tidal action severely impacted the beach line and the seawall previously installed along the State Highway —Route 25. Engineered walls with boulders were placed in concrete to defend against the wind/wave action from Orient Bay. Native plants were installed to stabilize the end sections and nesting structures were included for Osprey breeding. Tidal marsh was created along the channel to help halt erosion. Mount Sinai Yacht Club Tidal Wetland NYSDEC Permit Design and Installation: The creation of tidal wetlands behind the bulkhead replacement and design of upland plantings capable of withstanding the winds and the tidal action of the bay. An intertidal marsh was designed behind first bulkhead as mitigation measures for the bulkhead impacts on the harbor. Orient State Park Causeway Stabilization Project: Joint effort by NYSDOT/NYSOPRHP to stabilize the access roadway into the Park. Native plantings and a sand replacement plan were used to implement erosion control requirements from wind/wave actions. Gabions were used to develop a matrix for sand replenishment over time. Route 27 A at Penataquit Creek: This project was designed to reconstructed the Creek alignment under NYS Route 27A by removing vacant buildings, restoring the upper reaches of the creek banks, constructed a new weirs and replaced the deteriorated bulkhead on the tidal section of the creek. Storm water issues were resolved with the addition of new catch basins along the curb, new stone discharge pads along the creek, native vegetation planted along the creek banks, and stepped weir system installed upstream for water polishing. Horticultural practices were introduced with the planting techniques to improve the bio-engineering qualities placed along the creek banks. Special fertilizers with beneficial bacteria were specified to stabilize the coir fiber rolls in the emergent planting zone, native plants installed in and around the coir fiber rolls, and upland areas received plantings with native deciduous shrub and grass species. LIRR Vegetation Management Project: LKMA was retained by the Long Island Rail Road to develop a program to horticultural evaluate vegetation loss effects, caused by implementation of the Federal Rail Road Administration's mandates. Responsible for setting up the landscape policies for landscape zones, evaluating the horticultural impacts to the landscape management goals, and potential planting schemes. This project required coordination with local community groups and political leaders to re- establish landscape features along the LIRR right-of-ways where massive clearing and grubbing removed vegetative buffers. This horticulture/landscape coordination required writing specifications for LIRR construction contracts, creating standard details, developing site specific landscape planting plans, cost estimates and field inspection during construction. 0 U U\UUU ,,,a 1 �W24 IoW sem. y �CO ��p� JaoeNa3us jo aan>v, NIO� 42J 38 „ oy ?sA: \ 52 6 E b � F x w > moi+ a i V i C 0 r a z a =r l r �a OF ft ' NO.SJ 30 W '-343.-ie N��pGE CHAPEL LANE c=L Wi tit ' fir G k v w tt uj fit' Hyl 4 '.t "r�y � 11 � ry, I" u � i � � �' ±I� n �1 �� gr�"r f'u t �9n s u "i� ➢w h, a u +n ��� 4 w �k n�G SAF hM1 yy �f d ry ppb ds�r' a ° M((' a n stip �� n�F�b1'6�:;1.���kA���ti'�I6�J4.d�:? l� �1"��Y� mI ,k,d J. ,;rea � s Int f 'y i I v, f ' rM, r a r, ��� r� � �� ,7 dh �� �• a x I� � tea 6 � it $ � P, i Z t Iv M 1 t � �? t r't I ti i s °� w wt"�t r � � fit. thea m t t� un r '1 r, s �1 t T ;� �n ��r t "! g �. u n � � I', y n k � Pill d "f 5� R G r r� U �m r t � � �-j fi >7 t I rm�d ;+ + �'4r# Aw m9 I 7 � � al r �. s� t mm, �."m w � x y, h i r �� i mt sJgj r �(' tCF m e rig i, ra+ d✓tn t' n w I � ma n �� �.k m ��'n i enc 11" lia n a i � o 6 a� � :NY inn s F d t �� Pu �c f k � at �t Irl � M� t & mud n rAa� ' { } �a � n *Hpng u,� 'u lr m4 f d r z I� r '� m N + n � .191. ®b""I tfi � r' {�(' s iM '� I v a +�. 're �U h�5 w �n��' Mt �'`r� �IG�"�" � ��^� r n �� # 1*>t pl C �' fry ����� �"�w '° 't I� �w w�r;. �n full H�,n ��( n�a w,�M �" "� I! R , "i �����b ����o�n� Him :r � In � , r s 1 PRO �H r rr � I rrT/%lyi /ii � �agnm rawa,�„auaw a�a M,rca� s i111 zQ Ag1 //l 1 i� rllii � I� m.A IS / N3 M nm :i / 7E Soil Map—Suffolk County,New York _3: (Vicinity of Vineyard View) 719380 719440 719500 719560 71962D 719680 719740 41°615"N 41°615N v o_ v or 0 o Soil Nlap may i�ot he valid at this scale. 41°557"N 41°557'N 719380 719440 719500 719560 719620 719680 719740 3 Map Scale:1:2,610 if printed on A portrait(8.5'x 11")sheet. Meters N 0 35 70 140 210 Feet 0 100 200 400 600 Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N WGS84 LJJSl)A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 I: M O O N -o N O O_ M N N �j 01 7 N i N N @ N I M Q N N N @ N m 3 0 0 b o o a N 3 E w o) N _� E v o E >o o .- CL Q _ ° Z N U N O C ^ > N 0 .] U E M O 0 E E ai Q m ° c w o m U) � U E ID °n Q m o ° o e0 00 U a � w N E m r M c o 0 0 Y ❑ o 0 3 o C7 L ° N Z o r w o f Q 3 oa' � Q c U I � ai ° �a Q � 0 3 o Lo2 > o m ❑ 3 N ° r 3 m o a c E U m Q- � Z o m o N ¢ m m o s ❑ OE � 0 ° 2 ° co o YO c°a `o o m LL a> > Z) a) c o 2 � Q) -7— coi wo � L uai o ETc°aN n � 'caom o � aoom o - U Q o � Ea� /Z O -O L N 7 fn U O fn ,� a O @ N N 0 o Q N m > o ° o o Q c Q U co cn w E OU "O' J > °Cf) co '.2C O c6 O E Q o s Q o c m � m o N o Z ° o Z ❑ E o ° m ° aci is ; " o 'c U) E c N Y � L o m o M is E ° .21 N O '6 'p C N Q > co CD o L (6 m 7 .N ❑ N ° '6 m O_ _ (6 i O O y6 N tq O C (6 .L.- a U CO ¢ '-' [O L a n E U) cn oiEo� T � cAo E @D0 � 'N � � D0 0 o a � E N 00 6) N '06 (_U6 y � 2 ° 'o C 2 O o �Y O > ` ¢ N O � CO � o � � uo 'n � U � v ° ao cn 0 Eo o 'Qo p E N O cp c6 O_.N c4 0 7 N y _ d O m._ L N E 'S2 C O U N N p N p (E O N Q U L .� .° j .O N O N L O@ Lu E — v a E cn U n a ¢ m o cn cn U) r ❑ co U . U) Y O >` 3 7 O N 1> > O -i6 N CO OD .> O U = E2 ° o U) o_ -0 o co Y N y T � 0 O y m T I .= C Q .Vcc fl. ll (j L C T -C = y O ¢ c O a m E ^m. 0 af D_ Z C T M N U m f/1 p (p .Q O m L a y O C O m U) m U n > O cq to O CC ¢ 3 R C v p O Z �� f r� a :7. ,� G LU R i �1 NNNWWW �i, F m W a.J y ^ 0 y N Q Q T N .0 0 (n C O C O a 'O y N N m O m a O a a > > > > m 3 y 0 y o o w o 0 a a a d 0 ❑ d T O d m m U) co >. N a o m m m y 0 3 (n 0 LL `0 O o o to Q m u 3 o T w > > o m m v r- > m a i ° 0 0 0 c o 0 m om c ¢ cn cn co a m m U U 0 (D J J a �° 0 0 0 in v> in R CD C qIr I� � �:.. ,,, i �0 ,gd�pL�u, oa d y U d C y 3 O U)CD O O! d 3 C w 0 R O Z U �It� Soil Map—Suffolk County, New York Vicinity of Vineyard View Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Bd Berryland mucky sand 1.2 5.8% Ca Canadice silt loam 2.5 11.9% De Deerfield sand 1.6 7.5% MkB Montauk loam,3 to 8 percent 4.7 22.3% slopes Mu Swansea muck,0 to 1 percent 0.3 1.4% slopes,coastal lowland PIB Plymouth loamy sand,3 to 8 4.8 23.0% percent slopes Ra Raynham loam 4.3 20.3% RdB Riverhead sandy loam,3 to 8 1.6 7.8% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 21.0 100.0% 1JSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/13/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 5 IA _ �I � ratty V N ----------------- 717 i i 4 m az m z V o m E O ) y rr ?m m U l OI�ji U ID C7 O � C k �w A� f, .i U f y Oip4 5 l 4—a U C) q LU C 0 Illllil tll N Z Cl) N T f6 7 4 N LL und AJlnt»cOPLoIsland Shelter Island Stand (Miau/Suflk Coun4es) ° %.7ar`diner Bay Watershed �fi �PAoidi ersSaund 0203020207 � r ' Ow d' �q Maril4ake y , Gu��`N� mm ree°4` stJri�rr reek� j/ ` l /rl r �;,�CbtC' arM, Has iarnc , IK( 1 Fe*w f eri 1 er Sir P4ih J't uirtn rtr f T wn/,Jocke ree1c � eek „ so � � �/���/rig �'` rw•, Fvasµ ��rn,m �,; ,x ��� ' cr �' les ' kar is t, ol ;3# .. rbor bor mile N" ti rthwect ►r r r , reef y , �s �M1�JImai west No geek L ora „ Creek Cr'e6 s a� ong, Crooked+ ted w Shelter Island Sound/Gardeners Bay Watershed (0203020207) Water Index Number Waterbody Segment Category (MW6.1a) GB Gardiners Bay and minor lidnal tribs (1701 0164.) Minor Impacts (MW6.1a) GB- 76-P395 ;darn Pored (1701 0228) No Known Impacts (MW6.Ia) GB- 77a-P396 Mairion 1-alce(1701 0229) Unassessed (MW6.Ia) GB-CI (`oeclles Ilarbor(1701. 0163) Minor Impacts (MW6.Ia) GB-LBB llaflock/Long Beach Bay and 6da� [ribs (1 701 0227) Minor Impacts (MW6.Ia) GB-OH 06mt Ilarbor and rruinor tidal gibs (1701 0168) Minor Impacts (MW6.1a) GB-P397 Spring Pored (1701 0230) Impaired (MW6.1b)GB-SIS Shelter Island Sound.,North, and tribs (17010170) Minor Impacts (MW6.1b)GB-SIS(-DH) Dering Ilarbor(1701 0050) Impaired (MW61b)GB-SIS(-PC) Pipes Cove(1701-0366) Minor Impacts (MW61b)GB-SIS(-SB) Souaitlnold flay(1701 0044) Minor Impacts (MW6.1b)GB-SIS-77-P400 Guu11 Pond(1701 023 1) Impaired (MW6.1b)GB-SIS-78 Stn'll i fig Creek and Basi ii (170 0049) Impaired (MW61b)GB-SIS-79 SI Sound Trib/Moores Drain,Lower,tribs (1701-0232) Unassessed (MW61b)GB-SIS-79 SI Sound Trib/Moores Drain,Upper,tribs (1701-0233) Unassessed (MW6.1b)GB-SIS- 81-P418a Buudds Pond(1701 0234) Impaired (MW61b)GB-SIS- 81-P420 Hashaanomuucllc Pound(1701 0162) Impaired (MW6.1b)GB-SIS- 83a,83b drown/lockcy(...reeks and J(.hd t6bs (1701 0235) Impaired (MW6.1b)GB-SIS- 84-P423 Goose Creek (1701 0236) Impaired (MW6.1b)GB-SIS-SI-1-P431 Crab Crcelc arnd tiiidall trims (1701 0240) No Known Impacts Pipes Cove (1701-0366) Minor Impacts Waterbody Location Information Revised: 01/04/2016 Water Index No: (MW6.1b) GB-SIS/PC Drain Basin: Atlantic-Long Island Sound Unit Code: 0203020207 Class: SA Atlantic Ocean Water Type/Size: Estuaty Waters 363.2 Acres Reg/County: 1/Suffolk(52) Description: entire cove Water Quality Problem/Issue Information (CAPS indicate MAJOR Pollutants/Sources) Uses Evaluated Severity Confidence Shellfishing Fully Supported Known Public Bathing Fully Supported Known Recreation Fully Supported Known Aquatic Life Fully Supported Known Fish Consumption Stressed Suspected Conditions Evaluated Habitat/Hydrology Good Aesthetics Good Type of Pollutant(s) Known: - - - Suspected: PRIORITY ORGANICS (PCBs/migratory fish) Unconfirmed: - - - Source(s) - -Source(s) of Pollutant(s) Known: - - - Suspected: OTHER SOURCE(migratory fish species) Unconfirmed: - - - Management - -Management Information Management Status: No Action Needed Lead Agency/Office: ext/PEP IR/305(b) Code: Water Attaining All Standards(IR Category 1) Further Details Overview Pipes Cove is assessed as having minor impacts due to fish consumption that is thought to be stressed by PCBs. These advisories are the result of the migratory range of these fish species, and not related to any known contamination in this specific waterbody. All other evaluated uses are considered to be fully supported. Use Assessment Pipes Cove is a Class SA waterbody, suitable for shellfishing,public bathing and general recreation use, and support of aquatic life. Shellfish harvesting for consumption is considered to be fully supported in these waters.All of this waterbody(included within Shellfish Growing Area #53) has been certified as safe for the taking of shellfish for use as food. These shellfishing designations are based on results of water quality monitoring and evaluation of data against New York State and National Shellfish Sanitation Program monitoring criteria. Certified/uncertified shellfish area designations are revised regularly; for detailed descriptions of current designations, go to www.dee.ny.gov/regs/4014.html. (DEC/DFWMR, Region 1,July 2015) Recreational use including public bathing is considered supported based on monitoring at beaches in the waterbody and shellfishing certification monitoring. Beach monitoring revealed no elevated bacteriological levels at beaches and no beach closures. Beaches within this reach include Fifth Street Park Beach and Silver Sands Motel Beach. Additionally, bacteriological sampling conducted through the shellfishing monitoring program suggest public bathing is supported. (NYSDOH BEACH Act monitoring results, 2010 and DEC/DFWMR,July 2014) Fish consumption is considered to be stressed due to NYSDOH precautionary health advisories recommending limiting consumption of larger weakfish (over 25 inches) and other species from these marine waters due to possible elevated levels of PCBs. These advisories are largely precautionary and are related to the specific habits and characteristics of these species, specifically the wide migratory range, predatory nature and high lipid/fat content that make them more likely to accumulate contaminants. In addition, for some species the advisories recommend limiting consumption to no more than one meal per week which is no more stringent than the general statewide advisory for all New York waters and does not result in significant impact to uses. Because possible contamination is more a result of the migratory range and other factors rather than any known sources of PCBs in this waterbody, fish consumption use in this segment is considered to be stressed rather than impaired. (NYS DOH Health Advisories and DEC/FWMR,Habitat,January 2014) Water Quality Information Assessments of recreational uses and aquatic life in marine waters are based primarily on information from NYS and local health departments and the NYSDEC Division of Fish Wildlife and Marine Resources.This information is compiled and updated in regularly issued advisories and certifications regarding bathing beaches,shellfishing harvest and sportfish consumption. (NYSDOH and DEC/DFWMR,2014) Source Assessment Impacts to fish consumption are the result of elevated PCBs in fish species with a wide migratory range; there are no known PCB sources within the waterbody of significance. Management Action This segment is included within the Peconic Estuary Program (PEP) study area, situated between the North and South Forks of eastern Long Island and consisting of more than 100 distinct bays, harbors, embayments, and tributaries, covering more than 128,000 acres of land and 121,000 acres of surface water. As part of the National Estuary Program (NEP), the Peconics were charged with developing and implementing a watershed—based comprehensive management plan. To accomplish this goal the PEP established an innovative partnership of local, state, and federal governments, citizen and environmental groups, businesses and industries, and academic institutions. The PEP Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (COMP) was formally approved by USEPA in 2001. There are over 300 specific management tasks included in the CCMP, with priority topics focusing on Brown Tide, nutrients, habitat and living resources, pathogens, toxic pollutants, and critical lands protection. A vessel waste no discharge zone was established for the entire Peconic Estuary in 2002 to address impacts from boat pollution. (PEP,August 20 10) Section 303(d)Listing Pipes Cove is not included on the current (2014) NYS Section 303(d) List of Impaired/TMDL Waters. There are no impacts that would justify the listing of this waterbody. (DEC/DOW, BWAM/WQAS, January 2015) Segment Description This segment includes all estuary waters north of a line from Conkling Point to Fanning Point. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region 1 Ask, SUNY @ Stony Brook goom 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 Phone: (631)444-0403 - Fax: (631)444-0360 Website: WWW.d0c ny.gov Joe Martens Commissioner September 8, 2011 Constantine E. Kontokosta KACE LI, LLC P.O. Box 67 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: DEC # 1-4738-03637100001 KACE LI, LLC Proposed Annexation by the Village of Greenport of Approximately 17.2 Acres of Land (SCTM # 1000-40-3-1) in the Town of Southold and the Subsequent Development and Construction of a Residential Project Known as Northwind Village Dear Mr. Kontokosta: The Department of Environmental Conservation, as the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) lead agency, hereby issues the enclosed Findings Statement. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at 631- 444-0403. Sinc ely, Sherri Aicher Environmental Analyst Attachment: Findings Statement A copy of this Notice sent to: The Town of Southold The Village of Greenport NYS Dept. Transportation Suffolk County Dept. Public Works Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority F' 1 2 2011 Suffolk County Department of Health Services Peconic Estuary Program - North Fork Environmental Council New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region 1 SUNY @ Stony Brook 50 Circle Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3409 Phone: (631)444-0365•Fax: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.ny.aov Joe Martens Commissioner State Environmental Quality Review 151w 7`1& Pursuant to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act - SEQRA) of the Environmental Consvr vati-on Lav and 6N YCi1Pa Par7�t 61 , the New York Slate Department of Env<ronmental_ Conservation as the lead agency makes the following findings. Title of Action: Proposed Annexation by the Village of Greenport of Approximately 17.2 Acres of Land (SCTM#1000-40-03-01.)in the Town of Southold and the Subsequent Development and Construction of a Residential Project Known as Northwind Village. Application I.D. DEC Application # 1-4738-03637/00001 Description of Action: The proposed project involves the annexation by the Village of Greenport of a 1.7.2 acre parcel currently located in the Town of Southold adjacent to the northwest border of the Village. Once,annexed, the site is proposed to be developed with a 128-unit mixed-income affordable housing development, consisting of one-, two-, and three bedroom homeownership units, access roadway, driveways,common areas, and landscaping.The proposed project will create 64 affordable units(50%of the total units) as defined by Suffolk County, which will be subject to price, sale, resale, and ownership controls —collectively known as "affordability" restrictions. Location: The property is located on the south side of Suffolk County Route 48 (North Road), approximately 1,600 feet east of Chapel Lane in the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,SCTM#1000-40- 03-01. Agency Jurisdiction(s): Environmental Conservation Law of New York, Article 24, Freshwater Wetland Act. Date Final EIS Filed: April 14, 2011 History and Discussion: The proposed action involves a combination of activities which is rarely seen on Long Island and has considerably complicated the development of the environmental impact statement. The action consists of a proposal pursuant to New York State General Municipal Law to annex a parcel of land now located in the Town of Southold into the Village of Greenport and an interrelated proposal to construct a 128 unit residential condominium development with associated roadways, driveways, common areas and landscaping on the annexed parcel. KACE LI, LLC—Northwind Village Findings Statement Page 2 The idea for the annexation proposal originated with the project sponsor, KACE LI, LLC, which secured the support of the Village of Greenport for the annexation and presumably the post-annexation development of the parcel in approximately 2004/2005. KACE LI, LLC initiated the annexation process as prescribed in the General Municipal Law with a submission to the Southold Town.Board. When it became clear that the Town of Southold did not support the proposed annexation, the pending legal proceeding in the Appellate Division, Second Department was initiated, also as required by the General Municipal Law. The parties in this annexation litigation are the Village of Greenport and the Town of Southold. DEC has no standing or role in this General Municipal Law proceeding. The Department became involved in the action when the court required that the parties comply with the requirements of SEQR for the proposed annexation before a decision can be rendered on the petition. The Village and the Town were unable to agree on which agency would serve as the SEQR lead agency, and invoked the lead agency dispute resolution procedure in the SEQR regulations 16 NYCRR Part 617.6(b)(5)1, which provides for the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation to select a lead agency from among the involved agencies. As part of the DEC Commissioner's review of the action for the lead agency dispute, it was discovered that a DEC-regulated freshwater wetland system exists on the site and that some of the proposed construction activity for the residential development would be located within the area regulated by the Department pursuant to the Freshwater Wetlands Permit Requirements Regulations (6 NYCRR Part 663). This DEC permit requirement for the construction qualified the Department as an involved agency for the purposes of SEQR. Shortly after the Department's involved agency status was established, all of the involved agencies and the project sponsor agreed on the designation of DEC as the lead agency. The Department has consistently maintained the position that the annexation and the proposed construction must be considered as a single action for the purposes of SEQR because the two aspects are dependent upon one another. There would be no annexation proposal without the proposed Northwind Village development,and it seems very unlikely that there would be a development resembling the currently proposed Northwind Village without the annexation of the parcel by Greenport. To conduct the environmental review of the proposed annexation and residential development separately would be contrary to the intent of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. This is how DEC became the lead agency for this two-part action for which it has direct regulatory authority over only one part. As the SEQR lead agency, DEC's responsibilities included: -Deciding whether an environmental impact statement would be required for the action (known as making the determination of significance). Overseeing and coordinating the preparation of the DEIS and FEIS to ensure that they were adequate in scope and contain the information necessary for all of the involved agencies to make the findings and determinations required of them for the action. In the case of the KACE LI,LLC action, it required making sure that the record developed in the DEIS/FEIS contained sufficient substantive information on both the annexation aspect of the proposal and the development aspect of the proposal to support the decisions of all involved agencies, regardless of whether their involvement or regulatory authority included the annexation, the development project or both. KACE LI,LLC —Northwind Village Findings.Statement Page 3 In October of 2006, as the lead agency, the Department made the determination that the proposed action had the potential to result in one or more significant impacts to the environment, and accordingly,required the preparation of a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). In May of 2007, a draft scope for the DEIS was circulated to all involved agencies, including the Town and the Village, as well as any individuals who had expressed an interest in the action. The May 11, 2007 letters transmitting the draft scope to the responsible Town and Village officials emphasized the importance of the full involvement of both municipalities in the development of the scope for the DEIS and the rest of the environmental review process. Municipal agency involvement is important in the development of most impact statements, but in this case was absolutely essential because the proposed action involves the annexation or transfer of a parcel of land from one municipality to another in order obtain favorable zoning and municipal services for a proposed development. Many of the most important potential impacts and issues to be explored were local and municipal in nature. In addition, Section 617.8(d) of the SEQR regulations specifically states the importance of the participation of all of the involved agencies in the scoping process. After several extensions of the due date for comments, the Town and the Village both provided some generalized input on the draft scope. Noticeably absent from Southold's comments on the draft scope was information about Town regulated wetlands on the project site outside the limits of the state regulated wetlands already delineated by the Department, or any concerns about the selection of project alternatives identified for analysis in the DEIS. Around this time it also became clear that the position of the Village of Greenport on the proposed action had changed. Mayor David Nyce (who remains in office in 2011)indicated that any expressions of support for the proposed action by the Village of Greenport made prior to his taking office were the position of a previous Village administration, not the position of the current Nyce administration. The position of the Nyce administration seemed incongruous given that the annexation litigation still pending before the Appellate Division of the Second Department was initiated by the Village. The scope for the DEIS was finalized in late June of 2007. The DEIS was accepted by the lead agency and made available for review by the public and involved agencies in late September of 2009. The Department held a public hearing on October 28, 2009 to accept comments on the DEIS. By the close of the DEIS comment period in late November 2009, the Town and the Village had submitted extensive written comments. We also received written comments and public hearing statements articulating comments on the DEIS from several organizations and a number of individuals. While most of the commentary on the DEIS clearly and legitimately addressed the content of the draft impact statement, several the Town's comments raised issues which it had not brought to the lead agency's attention during the scoping process and thus were not covered in the DEIS. These issues include the presence of wetland areas on the site which were not delineated as such by DEC but can be considered wetlands under Southold Town Code, and objections to the alternative designs for the proposed condominium development selected for analysis in the DEIS project alternatives section. Despite the fact that we were notified of these issues very late in the process, they appeared to be important and therefore received consideration along with all of the other comments received on the DEIS. The FEIS, which incorporates the DEIS by reference,the comments received on the DEIS and the lead agency's response to comments was accepted and made available for review by the public and involved agencies in April of 2011. KACE LI, LLC—Northwind Village Findings Statement Page 4 The Town and the Village submitted detailed comment letters on the FEES in May 2011. Both letters basically restated many of the comments made on the DEIS, indicate disagreement with certain comment responses or conclusions contained in the FEIS and expressed objection to the proposed action. As the lead agency, it was DEC's responsibility to ensure that the environmental review produced DEIS /FEIS documents which identified and analyzed the environmental impact issues which were important to all of the involved agencies and the public in as clear, objective and succinct a manner.as practicable and would allow the involved agencies to make the findings required of them for this unusual, two part action. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the lead agency found it necessary and prudent to set limits on some of the areas of inquiry requested by the involved agencies after the scope of issues for the DEIS was finalized, especially in light of the two part nature of the action. An example is the issue of the municipal zoning which will apply to the site, the maximum build out which would be allowed under this zoning and the design alternatives selected for analysis in the DEIS. While DEC has consistently maintained that the action under consideration must include both the annexation and the construction project in order to avoid segmentation, it must be noted that the decision in the annexation petition (whether the site remains in the Town of Southold or becomes part of the Village of Greenport) will be a major determining factor in the municipal regulatory requirements applied to the development project, including zoning, site plan approval, possibly local wetlands, affordable/ workforce housing requirements and the provision of certain utility services such as sewer and electricity. Accordingly, the scope for the DEIS required the description and analysis of project design alternatives which took into account the possibility that the site may not become part of the Village of Greenport. So in addition to the 128 unit proposal based on Village zoning and connection to the Greenport sewer system favored by the project sponsor and the required no action alternative, the DEIS /FEIS looked at three other alternatives: -The site remaining in Southold with a 108 unit condominium development connected to the Greenport sewer system based on a development proposal approved for the site by the Town Planning Board in 1983. - The site remaining in Southold with the development of 50 single-family attached residential units connected to an onsite sewage treatment plant based on the Southold zoning in effect early in the DEIS preparation period. - The site remaining in Southold with the development of 44 residential lots connected to an onsite sewage treatment plant to comply with changes in Southold zoning requirements which came into effect around the time the DEIS was finished. KACE LI,LLC—Northwind Village Findings Statement :Page S Both the Town and the Village requested in comments on the DEIS or FEIS that additional project design alternatives be developed and considered. However, it must be understood that both agencies had the opportunity to review and comment on the draft scope, and that the development of the scope was the appropriate point in the process to make the case for the inclusion of additional design alternatives. The Town chose not to do so. The third alternative design outlined above (44 lots, onsite STP with the land remaining in Southold) was added after the Town's comments on the DEIS notified us that the applicable Southold zoning requirements had changed during the time period the DEIS was being prepared. In our judgment, the proposed action and the three design alternatives as described above covered an appropriate range of construction project sizes and the potential outcomes of the annexation petition. Certainly the densest, or likely"worst case" scenarios under both possible annexation outcomes were included, as were smaller designs which appeared to be feasible economically for the project sponsor. To require the consideration of additional scaled down alternatives which the sponsor could not afford to build would unnecessarily complicate and lengthen an already lengthy document. For these reasons, no additional design alternatives were required. Similarly, the existence of Town regulated wetlands on the site is an issue Southold had the opportunity to inform the lead agency of during the scoping process but chose not to. More importantly, the area identified by the Town as wetland appears to provide only marginal wetland functions and probably owes its wet characteristics mostly to stormwater runoff from Route 48. Also, the fact that the proposed action includes the annexation petition makes the issue of Town regulated wetlands uncertain and perhaps less important. Town regulated wetlands will be a factor in the development only if the site remains in the Town of Southold. If the site continues to be part of Southold, any development proposal will be subject to all applicable Town land use and zoning requirements, including the Town wetland regulations. This makes it certain that any development project (if the project sponsor even decides to pursue a development) would be significantly scaled down from the 128 units proposed under Village zoning. There should be little difficulty designing a scaled down project to avoid both Town regulated and State regulated wetlands. If the site becomes part of the Village of Greenport, the Town wetlands regulations would not apply. It would be up to the Village to decide whether it would exercise its discretion to protect the area. For these reasons, the lead agency decided not to require further information on Town regulated wetlands. The responses to comments contained in the FEIS and this findings statement are hereby determined pursuant to Part 617 to adequately address the issues raised. Some involved agencies may not agree with certain responses or some conclusions contained therein, but that does not change the fact that all substantive comments on the DEIS have been addressed. There is no requirement in Part 617 for all of the involved agencies reviewing a proposed action to arrive at the same conclusions and findings. The Department of Environmental Conservation, as the lead agency, has ensured that the DEIS /FEIS includes all of the information.and analysis required by each of the involved agencies to make the findings required of them for this action. This includes the Town of Southold and the Village of Greenport in the matter of the annexation petition as well as any subsequent development project similar to those analyzed in the DEIS/FEIS. It also includes DEC in the matter of the Freshwater Wetlands permit application required for the development as now proposed. KACE LI, LLC —Northwind Village Findings Statement Page 6 Facts and Conclusions in the EIS Relied Upon to Supi►ort Decision.. I. The proposed project is located in the adjacent area of a state- regulated freshwater wetland associated with Moores Drain/Pipes Creek, a system which discharges into Peconic Bay, part of a federally designated National Estuary. Moore's Drain occurs within Moore's Woods, a large, diverse forest consisting of mature,second-growth upland forests and forested wetlands which provides large areas of mature, high quality, and largely unspoiled habitat. In order to minimize the impact of the project on the wetlands and Moore's Woods, a 100-foot wide buffer area will be established landward of the freshwater wetlands. In addition, a row of native conifer trees will be planted along the perimeter of the 6.6 acre project area. The dense foliage of these trees will serve to shade the new forest edge and will reduce potential perturbations to the microclimate of the forest and limit the spread of invasive plants into the woodlands. 2. As the proposed development (the project sponsor's preferred 128 unit proposal based on Village of Greenport zoning and connected to the Village sewer system) will be connected to the municipal sewer services, potential impacts on the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands from transportation of sediments or other pollutants will be minimized. In addition, a stormwater control system capable of collecting two inches of runoff from impervious surfaces will be installed to help minimize the potential transport of stormwater and pollutants to the wetlands. All erosion and sediment control measures will conform to the New York State Guidelines for urban Erosion and Sediment Control. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ("SWPPP") will be prepared in compliance with Phase IT Stormwater Regulations and will address measures necessary to meet water quality standards for runoff and safe accommodation of flows from extreme storm events. Erosion and sediment control measures will include vegetative slope stabilization, phased clearing, silt trapping (using silt fence, hay bales; etc.) and other measures to prevent erosion and sediment migration onto adjacent properties and into the wetlands. 3. The proposed action will result in the elimination of 2.0 acres of successional old field habitats and 4.6 acres of successional southern hardwood forests. Successional old fields and successional southern hardwood forests are common habitats and are classified as "demonstrably" or"apparently" secure,respectively, in New York Slate indicating that these habitats are abundant throughout the State. However, to help mitigate the loss of these habitats, the applicant will preserve approximately 10.54 acres of existing red maple-hardwood swamps, old fields, and successional southern hardwood forests through a legal vehicle such as an easement or deed covenant. 4. Field observations and correspondence from the New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP) indicate that the subject property does not provide habitat for any endangered or threatened species of wildlife. Two species listed by New York State as Species of Special Concern, the eastern box turtle (Terrapene caroling) and Sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus), were observed on the subject property, and the woodlands, open fields, and forest edges provide suitable habitat for the Cooper's hawk (Accipter cooperi), another NYS Species of Special Concern. Potential impacts to these species and mitigation are discussed below. KACE LI,LLC — Northwind Village Findings Statement Page 7 a. The proposed action would result in the loss of foraging habitat for box turtles and the destruction of one box turtle nesting site. Another observed box turtle nesting site is located within the 100-foot wetland buffer area and would remain after project completion. The loss of the box turtle nesting site will be mitigated by the creation of a new nesting area on the western portion of the property in accordance with the guidelines for creation of box turtle nesting habitats set forth by the State of Massachusetts (Massachusetts Natural Heritage Program 2009). Both the existing nesting site to remain and the newly created nesting site will be maintained as follows. The sites will be inspected every two years. If encrusting mosses or other exotic weeds encompass more than 25%of the intended nesting area, those areas will be raked and accretions removed prior to the species nesting season. If herbaceous and woody species occupy more than 50% of the nest area, they will be removed. Shrubs taller than 24 in height will be trimmed. The removal areas will be raked and lightly tilled, and additional vegetation will be planted if necessary. b. In addition, the proposed action could result in increased mortality of adult box turtles when they travel into the proposed development. This impact will be mitigated by the installation of a small earthen and timber rise along the perimeter of the proposed development. During site grading, a six-to-eight inch vertical rise created from non- CCA timber posts (either two four-inch by four-inch posts stacked or a six-to-eight-inch diameter piling laid horizontally on the ground and imbedded slightly into the ground surface) will be installed along the perimeter of the proposed development. These posts or pilings will be anchored in place with reinforcing bar driven through the posts/pilings and into the ground. During site clearing, an excavator will be used to bury the posts/pilings approximately two inches into the ground. Backfill will be placed behind the posts/pilings to create a gentle slope on the landward side of the timber posts/pilings. This will create a vertical barrier for box turtles moving from the woodland towards the development, but will allow any turtles within the development to return to the woodland. C. The woodlands, open fields, and forest edges are suitable hunting habitat for Sharp- shinned and Cooper's hawks. Both Sharp-shinned and Cooper's hawks are known to be adaptable to urban and suburban habitats and hunt at bird feeders and in woodland edges located in residential areas. Large residential developments and subdivisions often result in a proliferation of invasive songbirds which nest under the eaves of buildings. Sharp-shinned and Cooper's hawks are known to prey upon these species in urban and suburban settings. Accordingly, the proposed action is not anticipated to adversely impact prey availability for Sharp-shinned and Cooper's hawks. Under the . proposed action, potential winter roosting sites within the mature oak-tulip forest and red maple-hardwood swamps will be preserved. However, the quality of potential roosting sites in the forest habitat adjacent to the proposed clearing limit will likely be degraded due to the presence of lights in parking areas and buildings. KACE LI, LLC—Northwind VillageTindings Statement Page 8 This increased nighttime lighting is not likely to significantly impact the potential for Moore's Woods to support either Cooper's or Sharp-shinned hawks, as the impacted forest edge accounts for less than two percent of the forested areas associated with Moore's Woods. However, in order to minimize this potential adverse impact, the applicant will install outside lighting which strictly complies with the Dark Sky Society's Guidelines for Good Exterior Lighting Plans including its specifications for lighting location, directions and spread, bulb types, "shut-off'controls, heights of fixtures, amount of light, etc. 5. The FEIS examined alternative site designs as well as the no-action alternative. One alternative was the 108-unit condominium development originally approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board in 1983. The other alternative was for the development of the property in accordance with the prevailing HD zoning within the Town of Southold. At the time the DEIS was prepared, the HD zoning permitted the development of 50 single-family attached residential units: however, the Town's regulations were subsequently revised, and the changes resulted in a yield of 44 residential lots for the subject property. Each of these alternatives was examined in the FEIS. The amount of vegetation to be cleared and.the setback from the wetlands were very similar in all of the development alternatives. The amount of impervious surfaces was greatest for the proposed action, but the proposed stormwater retention was also increased accordingly. The greatest difference in ecological impact would likely result from the fact that the proposed action and the 108-unit alternative are proposed to be connected to the municipal sewer system, while the 50-unit and 44-unit alternatives proposed the construction of an on-site sewage treatment plant with its associated discharge of treated effluent to groundwater. It is unclear whether any proposed development would be permitted to connect to the Greenport Sewer District if the parcel were to remain in the Town of Southold, and thus, the on-site sewage treatment system was included in 50 unit and 44-unit alternatives. However, the proposed action would only be possible if the parcel were annexed to the Village and would thus avoid the impacts of an on-site sewage treatment plant. CERTIFICATION OF FINDINGS TO APPROVE/UNDERTAKE Having considered the Draft and Final EIS, and having considered the preceding written facts and conclusions relied upon to meet the requirements of 6NYCRR 617.11, this Statement of Findings certifies that: 1. The requirements of 6 NYCRR Part 617 have been met; 2. Consistent with the social, economic and other essential considerations from among the reasonable alternatives thereto, the action approved is one which minimizes or avoid adverse environmental effects to the maximum extent practicable; including the effects disclosed in the environmental impact statement, and KACE LI, LLC —Northwind Village Findings Statement Page 9 3. Consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, adverse environmental effects revealed in the environmental impact statement process will be minimized or avoided by incorporating as conditions to the decision those mitigative measures identified as practicable. 4. Consistent with the applicable.policies of Article 42 of the Executive Law, as implemented by 19 NYCRR 600.5, this action will achieve a balance between the protection of the environment and the need to accommodate social and'economic considerations. Name of Agency: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Signature of Responsible Official - ate '9' Name & Title of Responsible Official: George W. Hammarth Contact Person: Sherri Aicher, Environmental Analyst I Address: NYSDEC Region I Division ofEnvironmental Permits, SUNY Bldg#40, StonyBrook, NY 11790-2356 Telephone Number: (631)444-0403 SEQW� POSITIVE DECLARATION DEC I.D.It 1-4738-03637/00001 Reasons Supporting This Determination: (See 6NYCRR Part 617.7 for requirements ofthis determination) 1, The action requires construction in an area of high groundwater underlain with clay, glacial till and possibly other soils which present engineering challenges in regard to site drainage and soil compaction/compressibility. 2. Construction will continue for more than one year or involve more than one phase or stage, 3. The action will affect a body of water designated as protected pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law Articles 15,24 & 25. 4, Tire proposed action will require a discharge permit or permits. 5. Liquid effluent may be conveyed offthe site to a facility which may not have adequate capacity, 6 The proposed action will allow residential uses in an area that may not have adequate water services. T The proposed action may affect threatened or endangered species, 8. The proposed action may substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species, 9. The action may impact a site of'prehistoric or historic importance. 10.The proposed development will create a demand for,additional community services such as schools,police and fire protection. 11,The action involves the removal of the subject 17.2 acre site from the Town of Southold for annexation by the Village of'Greenport. Page 2 of 3 APPENDIX 6 ENERGY & WATER SUPPLY 1. SCWA Water Availability Letter 2. Village of Greenport Sewer Availability Letter 3. Existing Sewer Main map 4. National Grid Natural Gas Letters 5. PSEG Electric Load Letters L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. I.A . Co '.R AUT ------------- New Construction: P, 0, Box 38, Oakdale NY 11769-0901 (631)218-1148 December 4, 2017 Matthew C. Jedlicka Associate L.K. McClean Associates, P.C. 437 S Country Rd Brookhaven,NY 11719 Re: Water Availability- Vineyard View Affordable Apartment Complex SCTM 4 1000-40-3-1 BP#2000076794 Dear Mr. Jedlicka: We have received your request for information regarding availability of public water service to the above referenced property. Per Your request, we have determined that there is an existing water main adjacent to the above captioned property frorn County Road 48 and based upon the water requirements provided in your application dated November 29, 2017, the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) has sufficient capacity to this property, for domestic and fire demands. However, we may request additional measures to reduce and track irrigation demand by mandating a separate lap or reduce the number of zones. SCWA strongly recommends a separate well for irrigation purposes only. Connection fees, which include any applicable water main surcharges, and key moneydirectional bore fees, will be required for service line installations, as well as service line and RPZ applications and inspections. An RPZ device is required on commercial properties. SCWA recommends the use of smart irrigation control systems and drought tolerant plantings to promote conservation and minimize the impact of peak pump age so as to ensure compliance with the SCWA Water Conservation Plan, ExistingMain_RPZ Notification .V,VOLK CO A AUT110 If you have any further questions or would like to proceed with application for service, please contact our New Construction Department at (631) 218-1148 or the undersigned at (631) 563-5672. Please be advised that should your requirements for service increase at any time following the issuance of this letter, you are urged to contact this office. This letter of availability expires 12/4/2019 Sincerely 9�'e Lisa Manager LCJ s [Type text] X GP November 3, 3017 'Dt 1838 Mr. Allan Handleman, Vice President of Development NPO Conifer Realty, LLC 1000 University Avenue, Suite 500 Rochester, NY 14607 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT NY 11944 Dear Mr. Handleman: Tel: (631) 477-0248 Fax: (631) 477-1877 Please be advised that sanitary sewer service can be made available at, and the Village of Greenport's sewer treatment MAYOR facility has adequate capacity for, the site on Route 48 between GEORGE W. HUBBARD,JR. Ext. 215 Chapel Lane and Queen Street, as described in your e-mail dated October 25, 2017. TRUSTEES JACK MARTILOTTA Kindly note that any and all connection facilities will be the DEPUTY MAYOR owner's responsibility for engineering and construction. All MARY BESS PHILLIPS DOUGLAS W. ROBERTS facilities must be designed and constructed in accordance with JULIA ROBINS all applicable rules and regulations. Please also note that connection fees will be determined upon VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR finalization of the site plan for the project. PAUL 3. PALLAS, RE. Ext. 219 Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. CLERK SYLVIA PIRILLO, RMC Ext, 206 erel TREASURER SiVa�u I . J1 as I ROBERT BRANDY Village dministrator Ext. 217 cc: Mayor George W. Hubbard, Jr. Denis Noncarrow, Town of Southold Gwen O'Shea, Community Development Corporation of Long Island I���ourr oryr , n��''y�wru rv� y�Id��I� wr��;ugniu,rw, r/ wVllwy NSW M .Y� rr j Cpl r+vww'wr ry Iwi Iry.o „.'° bv�yl� rVpV� I� I�Vnl /��tj l umuN'^ J�71wry, � wYu.,, ✓/ n ww�, Ilf mu iurr'u "'4a Mf y di VP>ro". �P kk �c A ra IR "°"om "ll."N'NG<w'�Ir° IIII.t 'YN i V",,, I t W"a"^ Vllll llln W I�Nllllld�o y a� I�� 'fir 4�, Vhu" am7mm a '' prt ^+wm /r ell a wy f r L_ w�mmmurma (Xyr iku''v � ilyw lq, vuyel im ilA .u�ir'E '41� 1' IIlib ul— )rrY'wl � � 71�/rrrr 15w Ilu r "LL— All vuummuuVr� v %i r /i; r pir��oo/iii IIVN'rµv ff Ry1YV''W�YY a Im loll ' ^ "'Ili,,, � / f. uv" "tl rn ��.a�arrainivu .rr�i;I� /,, y ms fall �ar rldf r/O r� W ry v„.v� ' ai/,r R� r� e., n�,iooiiroorrr// d y- I( 2 IIS llu�yy u I I,� Jf ry^I E�"u�V """wHu,"mar vim, r� ual O w.w"Ivn uuw � a � B r"ntluww„,,, r'vryy�°y u CL wr,°•��"Nwl,w�� �tipv w II V "Mva wary. v'uWr� ��hm, vuvax IwI N 2 . O c� rad d 2I lyf "wmwl MP 2 �4ryN Iw ��°rolwl Yn , �14 W Hy �pl� Y Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg A- East City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 © UG40-38TFP I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total New BTU Input 228.000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg A-West City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 © UG40-38TFP I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total New BTU Input 228.000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg B- East City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 ® UG40-38TFP I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 Wtr Htr tank- Giant0.67 20 UG50-38TFP I Std. 1 1 38,000 XD 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 Total New BTU Input 380,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg B-West City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 ® UG40-38TFP I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 Wtr Htr tank- Giant0.67 20 UG50-38TFP I Std. 1 1 38,000 XD 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 Total New BTU Input 380,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg C City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 ® UG40-38TFP I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 Wtr Htr tank- Giant0.67 20 UG50-38TFP I Std. 1 1 38,000 XD 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 Total New BTU Input 380,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg D- East City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 © UG40-38TFP I I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 Wtr Htr, tank- Giant0.67 10I UG50-38TFPI I Std. 1 38,000 XD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total New BTU Input 266,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg D-West City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant 0.67 © UG40-38TFP I I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 Wtr Htr, tank- Giant0.67 10I UG50-38TFPI I Std. 1 38,000 XD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total New BTU Input 266,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Gas Load Letter - .-YOU. 01,110110 HERE WITH YOU. In order to process your request for gas service, the following information is required. Project Address —North Rd, Bldg_ City Southold State NY Zip 11939 Project Contact Name Paul Marfione, Project Director Phone# 585-342-0500 EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT REMAINING ON PREMISES Please enter the type of equipment(e.g. "Heat", "WH", "Cooking", etc.),the number of units, model number(if available), operating pressure, BTUs, and rate. Type Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Min. Max. Firm or Dual Fuel 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 Total Existing BTU Input NEW GAS EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ON PREMISES Type AFUE Qty. Model Press. BTU Input Rate Firm or Dual Fuel Wtr Htr, tank- Giant0.67 20I UG50-38TFPI I Std. 1 38,000 0 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 0 Total New BTU Input 76,000 Other Energy Efficiency On This Project: Pipe Insulation❑ Building Controls❑ Roof/Wall Insulation ❑ Other Would you like information on our Energy Efficiency Programs? ❑Yes ❑No Please Check Res.1 to 5 family ❑ Customer/Account Name Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Multifamily family ❑X Mailing Address 1000 University Ave., Suite 500, Rochester, NY 14607 Commercial ❑ @ Phone pmarfione@conniferllc.com Email P conniferllc.com Please Check New Construction 0 Plumber Company Name Existing Structure ❑ Mailing Address Phone Email Expected Gas On Date Return Form To: Fax: 718-498-1183 or email to: NYCGSSQnationalgrid.com Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. A- East CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 400 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 400 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 5,500 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 7 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 30 F] Unknown Electric Heating 11 TOTAL 55 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. A- West CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 400 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 400 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 5,500 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 7 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 30 F] Unknown Electric Heating 11 TOTAL 55 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. B - East CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 10,800 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights 12 :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 21 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 60 F] Unknown Electric Heating 36 TOTAL 129 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. B - West CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 10,800 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights 12 :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 21 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 60 F] Unknown Electric Heating 36 TOTAL 129 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. C CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 9,400 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights 12 :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 21 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 59 F] Unknown Electric Heating 36 TOTAL 128 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. D - East CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 6,200 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights 4 :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 12 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 44 F] Unknown Electric Heating 24 TOTAL 84 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Bldg. D - West CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 6,200 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights 4 :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 12 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 44 F] Unknown Electric Heating 24 TOTAL 84 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location Please submit all paperwork to: w �p��w.. L �D Building&Renovation Services PSI S LA t� Phone: 1-844-341-6378 Fax: 1-844-846-1550 �ufov f°,w--)1of"".. Email: BRSLI@PSEG.COM Residential/Commercial/Industrial JOB NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST/LOAD LETTER Customer Name: Vineyard View, LLC Attn: Paul Marfione Date: 2/21/18 Address: North Rd., Community Bldg. CrossStreet: Town: Southold, NY 11939 Customer Email: pmarfione@coniferllc.com Phone: 585-324-0500 Builder's Name: Phone: Electrical Contractor's Name: Lic#: Address: Town: Zip: Electrical Contractor's Email: Phone: Service Characteristics ■ Service Size 600 Amperes ■ Overhead ❑ Underground ❑x 1 � X 3 � ❑ ■ Main Switch Size 600 Amps ■ Voltage 240/120 ■ Total Sq. Ft. of Building 2,300 Ft Load Information (Total Load by Category) Estimated Monthly Connected Demand (kw/Month) Estimated Monthly Electric Demand Lights s :1 Motors HP F-1 Less than 7 KW Common area load, including hall lighting, elevators, etc. 7KW or more :1 Air Conditioning 7 :1 Refrigeration Over 145 KW (June— Sept) :1 Computers or 500 KW (Oct— May) :1 Welders :1 Miscellaneous Equipment 56 F] Unknown Electric Heating 17 TOTAL 86 kW ***A site plan or sketch is required for ALL new Commercial services, please include the following information: Exact Building Location F-1 Proposed Transformer Pad Location Proposed/Existing Subsurface Facilities ❑ Proposed Cable Route Proposed Meter Location APPENDIX C TRAFFIC DATA 1. Traffic Volume Data 2. ITE Trip Generation Data 3. Intersection Capacity Analyses Results 4. Population Growth Projection Data 5. Sight Distance Requirements 6. Crash Data L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. W CO N N C-4 0 0 S M CO 0 z m Ul)11 0 to 0) r- S:F 0 ui z 0—M 0) 0 9 20 t 0 0 S(DO aV z COz Z* .. (-) 5 0 0 0 co m 0 ce C'. :p p x C> -j F- (0(0 W Ln coa,da N V MT COm NN 04 N M It N 1,-.0 W NMNMMWM C 0 0 z to t- N*Lr) La 04 10 N=)LL U)2. Z to 0 0 'D 9f) 04 0 CD tl- CL v w 11 It (D z It 0) M A LL"I Ww VO-N N a) z rNwhOwOf LLLN P Cl) v to 1-0 Z) V) NOMMOgm 2, 0 0 co 00 C)w 0 N co 0 uj -,z w '0 z(D UJ 0 0)- Lf)(Dm (, LI) UJ > D co 0 LC)Lr)to r� U. z 2 !�,�—— 0 U>l ON ai LLJ 0 ui Mcq-It 0 m m C)0 ui C/) 0 Ccfl UJ a+oLLJ 0 z E2 < z 0- LLJ Dr. > Cl) M z O = Lij < U) ov < 0 LLJ ' W a 2 (0 >-2 :� V) U. w LIJ Lli t-0 N 0 00 W N oo D 0 m W W W at 0(D w LLI ....... U- w CL < 0 CL r WCL (4 LLI 0, M w W co 0) W w 0 W3�w 0 co LL) t000ltNom C14 N 3;3 w M m N r,0 00 0 W 0�r C4 W Lu LLI UJ 0 (0 t-t,a)a)(7)m g MMMMMNN 3 co C LO C) OOQWO C) u (D ui w U<- < 00(D p 't 0 Lu Z U- < z 6iSM f, CD t- w o McD 0 N 00 (14 In0 Q 'I) () �vro M f,M 0 'N N 00 = 0 r ca N Lli (D C; 00 C14 CO z z co 0 o =) ui w.. yoz �4 z LL 0 2 F-LL 0 0 2FU-- 0 0 LL W5 o :5 F<- Z a (J0uj oto 0 HF- z 6- F- ::) < go 0 ON WN tN-NO NO 00 N m v m m N w m �2�)ON NN 0 z 0 a � CN ado rrW (0 0(D tD Ja V) F 0 N a) CO z (0�r r-I-r- N 0 (c(D LU z -j 000 fD V) 0 tl-M (0 CN m 0 00 zz 11 (D pF z LL OfbTt 04 0 t,V) ul =)0 0 co CD r..r�U, LU tea. �0-�2 dar 04 N 01 co 00 OD 0F- 0) LL LL t- co mmco 0 to 0 ri) 0 rU) z (D 04 o C4 :) LL Z LO R'D r--Lf)'um V Lo In 10 CL CI'S -'i LLI 0 0 < m wwww to Lnz W)W) -t a)Ao LO(00C t- U) 2 N Jyy 0 0 to I�j — CN 0) OCI) OR 0 to ui T,U')CO 00 m LU -)�n-4.U)'t LO m LU > 0 U. z 0 0 uj ui c) t U) U) U) 0 (D w F= Z .4 �: � Wo => ui 0 M z z > m W Li< z C� a- LU 4. < oQr foto v U)U) 0 v OW 0 M >. Li 2 U) Lu LL LU -j Z 0 0 uj tO t()(N 0 00 W)Lf)v 4) to 0 L) 0 w 0 ("00 In le 1*'T V4 ❑ e w LL C0L < CL 0� F- toui N U) co�o 0) 0 to 00 Wv co N N (DACNM m m 0 m V),o I C) UJ w UJ w 00 LD to N m 00 Q0 CO 0 C>M co (M t N�——N, - U) CO Itt 0 U- F-, F coq to pc v 0 U-) to LLJ y LL < w r`N A rl or- M 04 M 04 001, h a Li Z 0 LL. Z 0o" (N 0 a< � 01 C> -P N 531 lt) V)LO Y) C14 co 00 C) dN co ? m 'o C3 Z. o :D z 0 U Lij Up Z of z U_0 0 w w U-0 0 F3 F-LL 00 F- Z 0 0 V) LLJ Uj Z lL� D 0 p-m 0 —r-——————— (n 0 Z Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments,townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels(floors). Multifamily housing (mid-rise)(Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), and off-campus student apartment(Land Use 225) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual, the low-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories.An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database.As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available,there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this category. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the one site with Saturday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 9:45 and 10:45 a.m. For the one site with Sunday data,the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. For the one dense multi-use urban site with 24-hour count data,the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 6:15 and 7:15 p.m., respectively. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents,there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.13 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.21 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 29 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 29 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 168 Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45- 10.97 1.31 Data Plot and Equation 5,000 X r , 4,000 N X a W 3,000 o. t= n h 2,000 X X X X X 1,000 X xX 00 100 200 300 400 500 600 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=7.56(X)-40.86 Rz=0.96 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 31 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 50 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 187 Directional Distribution: 63%entering, 37%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18- 1.25 0.16 Data Plot and Equation 500 400 X N U C W d F 300 X 200 X X X' X XX X X XX 100 X X X X X 00 200 400 600 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Ln(T)=0.89 Ln(X)-0.02 R2=0.86 - ,{�� Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 33 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 35 Avg. Num.of Dwelling Units: 146 Directional Distribution: 59%entering, 41%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.67 0.41 - 1.25 0.14 Data Plot and Equation 400 X X 300 w v W a XX h JX n 200 X X X 100 X X X Xx X X 01 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=0.66(X)+1.41 Rz=0.94 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 35 We;F Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator SettinglLocation: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. Num.of Dwelling Units: 89 Directional Distribution: Not Available Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.70 0.41 -0.93 0.20 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 200 150 N v C X W .2- It- 100 100 X 50 X� 00 50 100 150 200 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=1.08(X)-33.24 R2=0.92 �® Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 37 Multifamily Housing (Lour-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Sunday,Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 5 Avg. Num.of Dwelling Units: 89 Directional Distribution: Not Available Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.67 0.36-0.93 0.22 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 200 150 X W a n N 100 X 50 X X 00 50 100 150 200 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=1.12(X)-40.41 R2=0.93 -- � Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 39 Multifamily Housing (Low-Mise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 21 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 270 Directional Distribution: 20%entering, 80%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.39 0.25-0.86 0.15 Data Plot and Equation 300 X X a X W n 200 X X F` n F X 100 X X 00 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Ln(T)=0.92 Ln(X)-0.51 R2=0.92 o Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 41 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 27 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 231 Directional Distribution: 20%entering, 80%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.45 0.25-0.98 0.17 Data Plot and Equation 300 X X X W X X a 200 F= u 1- X X X 'X X 100 X X X X 'X X, 00 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Ln(T)=0.95 Ln(X)-0.50 RI=0.91 ® Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 43 Multifamily Housing (Love-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Saturday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 10 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 249 Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.68 4.41 -9.14 1.37 Data Plot and Equation X 3,000 W X n 2,000 X F` u X X X X 1,000 X 00 100 200 300 400 500 X=N um b er of Occu pied Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=6.47(X)+53.39 Rz=0.75 ® Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 45 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Sunday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 10 Avg. Num. of Occupied Dwelling Units: 249 Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 5.78 4.20-8.77 1.19 Data Plot and Equation 2,500 X 2,000 U) X W a E`- 1,500 X X X ' X 1,000 X X 500 00 100 200 300 400 500 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=5.11(X)+167.99 R'=0.75 ® Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition-Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 47 Multifamily Housing (Low®Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 1 Avg. Num.of Residents: 77 Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.42 1.42- 1.42 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 200 150 w a H u X 100 50 00 20 40 60 80 X=Number of Residents X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given jTrip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 49 0 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 1 Avg. Num.of Residents: 77 Directional Distribution: 90%entering, 10%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.13 0.13-0.13 Data Plot and Equation Caution-Small Sample Size 10 X s C: 6 n t= u F- 4 2 00 20 40 60 80 X=Number of Residents X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given Rz=**** Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 51 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. Num.of Residents: 373 Directional Distribution: 63%entering, 37%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.32 0.13-0.65 0.13 Data Plot and Equation 300 m c X W a 200 F- u X X X 100 X� X 00 200 400 600 X=Number of Residents X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=0.25(X)+27,46 R'=0.66 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 53 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 124 Directional Distribution: 30%entering, 70%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.36 0,32-0.63 0.57 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size X 80 60 m c W n. n 40 X X 20 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=**** 0 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition*Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 55 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 124 Directional Distribution: 24%entering, 76%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.36 0.32-0.66 0.58 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size X 80 60 C Q u 40 X X 20 1 1 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R'=**** Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition-Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 57 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num.of Residents: 154 Directional Distribution: 50%entering, 50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.67 1.34-2.23 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 300 X X m W a 200 F` u h 100 00 50 100 150 200 X=Number of Residents X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=**** ® Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition-Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 59 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num. of Residents: 154 Directional Distribution: 55%entering,45%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.12 0.09-0.18 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Sural/Sample Size 20 X X 15 v w a F= H 10 5 00 50 100 150 200 X=Number of Residents X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given Rz=** Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 61 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Residents On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num.of Residents: 154 Directional Distribution: 51%entering,49%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Resident Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.15 0.13-0.18 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 30 25 X 20 X N W a N 15 10 5 00 50 100 150 200 X=Number of Residents X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=**** _. %TAW Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition-Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 63 Multifamily Housing (Lour-Rise) (220) Person Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 4 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 351 Directional Distribution: 61%entering, 39%exiting Person Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.53 0.47-0.65 0.09 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 400 300 w W a H n F 200 'w X X 100 00 200 400 600 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:T=0.40(X)+46.84 R==1.00 e Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 65 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Person Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 2 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 484 Directional Distribution: 61%entering, 39%exiting Person Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.48-0.56 Data Plot and Equation Caution-Small Sample Size 400 ' X 300 c W f- 200 X 100 00 200 400 600 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given Rz=**** Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition*Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 67 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) Person Trip Ends vs: Occupied Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: Dense Multi-Use Urban Number of Studies: 1 Avg. Num.of Occupied Dwelling Units: 257 Directional Distribution: Not Available Person Trip Generation per Occupied Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.71 0.71 -0.71 Data Plot and Equation Caution—Small Sample Size 200 X 150 W a E= u 100 50 00 50 100 150 200 250 300 X=Number of Occupied Dwelling Units X Study Site - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R'=**** Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition-Volume 2:Data-Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 69 Land Use: 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Description Mid-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have between three and 10 levels (floors). Multifamily housing (low-rise) (Land Use 220), multifamily housing(high-rise)(Land Use 222), off-campus student apartment(Land Use 225), and mid-rise residential with 1st-floor commercial (Land Use 231) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual,the mid-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories.An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database.As more data are compiled for future editions,this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the six sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.46 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the five sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 95.7 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. Time-of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the eight general urban/suburban sites with data,the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. 1 For the four dense multi-use urban sites with 24-hour count data,the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:15 and 5:15 p.m., respectively. For the three center city core sites with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 6:45 and 7:45 a.m. and 5:00 and 6:00 p.m., respectively. For the six sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents,there was an average of 2.46 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the five sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and total dwelling units, an average of 95.7 percent of the units were occupied. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five center city core sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.84 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.94 during Weekday,AM Peak Hour of Generator • 2.07 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 2.59 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition•Volume 2:Data•Residential(Land Uses 200-299) 71 u.tl"'p IIII'O4YI'W _COaJ YCO T NSa SN 3 _6a° Oo--I � -6C N -0N c 7mNm 0>o) S@ -NO 0 m 3 2 E ° O cm o UmZ -O 0- C7:, 3 _ > Nm tt:a) i C C c L ',n N S a) C O •��'�„ u 7 0 C -O O p m 3 M, m LT m 00 '^ l0 Y J C Z O T C O a) (51 VI V°7 V Vf O aT+ N Vf aJ -6 C +N+ m C u 4 O -,Ln C o -0 o o >o s o E 3 v '° z y u m c 0) o 0 V m j } +' > 3 V Oi 'O a1 a/ N T WM E C-) 4 p O O a) 00 v aav l -o,nvoo vOO tS C Z 0pv CL c E _ ` o v 0a) m 4 D E 6 -2 aE O m N 00Zo uE �pc aE ° oomoQ& I ? E -0 vY 'o o > W c c Ln O^ c Z co pso o 'o ° " % O Q aO C Q o Q l IU p_,�6 N Q o C s ut N O - y ° — Q E O c m c E m .� m Q oO E E N Q o -0 -C u o u 0 c c Q , Q D1 C a) Iz mO Ls~m Oaa)) 0 � O yRCQ Ln =i YO vvCVE O CIV c 2' m cco m �c o. o O -p 0 O Vv 0- E E co >j � N tltl a) pV V Nx A v c v Q m o v - E C C 2 CO Q Q 3 E v N 7 X i C a1 m o m i O m m Ct�i1 C m m 6 m v v 7 o m p o, D ap 3 m — ° > 3 v c m o O O v qj S vi to O ut O m 3 m N Q Q U u 'C: aci a� —0 n c S O o F 'O o >2 t v �e w N C .L- m > v O � � ci C uq y O > m ._ V7 V LT N If J'9 LT- C Y a) C V C N R c a) m O Q 3 c .� m O a) w O C M o' c — o Q '�' o Q S '� J m E Y WIt — o v E o a) 0 a R o o °u t w r a B� v vro N O O O o Op -p -C- O j N m M C v N O m 0) � -c R 0) Z c m m Q� Z a CD _6 C O E �5 m in 7 C " m ~ -0 w '-' �V6 Q o 'O O vi O c -OmVE NO _a) E 92 Nh m O O S .� p m . S S Op E � v C -p l o Q O 0� N c c Co '@ C V m C C p LT 0 0 'N m .� '� c E m v v OE cm 'oQO 7io--,0-- m c v7Ea N O , y S E o o �vm c — - v N C C O - 7 oE O V NO O N>O v S u iJ ut •v 7 .v a) a) C m C p ._ 7 V v F m vu c a) ._ L E m E v p m E Lr m D o �, o a`) o_ 0 3 c E v � N - c � m S 'a Lr T u Q Q c v y v Q ° — a) -p c .L i -o o V; m S o > m o o L31 0 m o .� a'c -0 m Q c c Q o E n ° o c ° a s a) oN c Q '-^ O m � 3 at v c v o E c y O E 9 Qa ° a -o O a) o Q .Ea X v c ' E ooQ a c m o � 7 a) C Q O ' ML '> Zv O ' N o E aj Q mS u - >,c�- CajsCm C ° Ca o i) — pc a O . 0) O o a) . Ca cm u . .c o O -0 . a)o QCm a . o ) > E u cT51 F a ° > M 'o Q M ° m aV c c o C) v ° :° m c '� > a>i dl a o v v o E Q a o u a Ll v m m ^ a ac n a -0 o o c Q. > o — m = 0) +- m e c o m E 3 m - .- o T— . w > c o c ° -p m e o a Q - c ° — a c m y o O c 2 > E Q.- v c m u Q m E n 'T v v a o re - - — E s E o D a '- :L a� o o v - o c o " o c v o v c � m ai F ._ v Lr m o 3 Z, Q u m v ._ u F 3 3 m 3 a) u a) c II IIII �IYYNN^^u�^hug I. luau 9 -0 O 0) IIIIIIIIIIIIII �� C O aL.+ 3 C to m V N � � m m R rn a I a,I iy W N O m m N 4 V ° co 0 p � O � Q) S1 O N a) I� N V W O W N rl fi 61 co m Ln m O N N ✓1 C fv7 a I.! N N Ql M N ✓1 N n C ti ca m Cf6 - m m r W t0 O O m � Ol O� NI O N V Ol W al fa O O C C f6 I'U� N crl O m o O 6 l V0 a a a E m C N � cq V c O i9 � O O N O M 0 N l0 Q V 3 v N I G m vi V r-i oS d �i � m of �I• :J N - N O A U � O c N to V . v1°i ro o v v^i vii o i a aOO Q CN N m 7 W 6i is� W II /. Ol CvC Q x 'cn vi VI�N N O W W --I M 1'II.IIiII.II Q D Q O C Q V Vf L Ql O h r1 Ol Ol � h V1 V1 J%�" 3 v O �a o o N N v m��� £ p � > � a) +T• T W N Ol LA M M O N N ✓/ � I'�� O � � rl ✓i N N _ a () A) N � vNi M � � O - I� O lD C a1 0 C I vi o O aJ aJ C >> �O m p o 0 'o O O C 6 O O r c o c O O V N V V a vn �,r! V o v v o ^' is .Y Q v Q Q a N � +.1f o y = c su`, �' 12 o o azrj m° m` wS v > j0 c O 30 Q O o N .� t O- O- Z y N C C aJ 0 0 a1 m O ca 7 cu: 4 C s p fa vi 'in O > m V O } O y m `a aci V v� O a C >, LE n O C a1 � i j N o ti Z v y _¢ '.1 v C V s ra Ln d n o aJ 3 m � � o } a a a, _ Y o w N Q > c O z O c C O 0 N s '�N 'O Q T v ? aj > Oa O o N -CO: w ai a, 3 a m a @ -p ,C ,.N 4 C :L; O- N o .°' .y C V aru .�n °. ai N ^ 2 c a � a -o Z c O_O O O O N T N ra c o a7 o aA& Q 7 C Q — C N O N C C C C L ,� Q c v "Z o Q O O >, s t V m o asa c O- O 3 o Q� N v2 aj o u p o_O^ 2 V y V N O C a s T a . cm � m +T a) a O C O � 7 Y T >, c c 511 5111 O p o O p c d R,",„ LJ .O '6 s o .— d=3 cmN '- N O � h V N Zi y a N cL O T al s a > T N Z -2 A -fl C w tla. H C iC y Q N N L T C lD p O C O -_ 7 la ' in m m > 2 o Q E E ¢ o - V V -o 0 M m !n R in m p c 3 a '� m m O " o v v o cu p O a Z o Q o uA t N o Y Q w -6 S Q m j o o C w n C s O C ' C ��v� 5 N o N O s T\ O N *' j Q N 00 C - I E o w v IOIQ � � 3p In m � to s vi C Qv - O_ v .Oo C w ) > c Y o m 3 c 3 p D) > O cu w (A \ - cn O C m �a '�' `1 > � w p L p C Iz w p O O i p V a a lo v 3 ^ c o 'Q- Al .v C 3 7 O -O In X .0 a) �' N N O O o y cz 5 L C v � t Q o > Q _ E a M Pi%tl f O O N 7 7 N +L+ a a) O -a m a) V i Q N c c v ^ n .� `a 0 3 o a - L 3 m a' , o V > o 0 3 co c, y c m c y OC) N w ma O o m ^ -a vicN cs v ,� � v -p pmj N yv. v N 3 >, Q i o -c u C Y t 7 v C O o v O Z r-i .� @ v� H 2 4 0 d w O } E F u.J",U v uvYW �, o m '" 4 -.- iC,110 fr F-0 -O 5 �° ✓s v c0 N N E E c 4- o c o a c v v — a frll ,{ I C v p v v n 0 in � OE •vi �n c � o v Q N O O O p m O E N v N 141 i-A BT;,; ✓'1 'i � 7 to 0) N � � � -0 p o T C � 0 -00 � N p c p — O - 'O v T O -O -O urE O i Ol ta cp -'iOj N 6i -O 0 'O p6 � OWol — 1E Est 3 o 0 D pO n o 6 spc O X OQ L* C pa3 2 0N cQ O O % D 2C NQ O p O_ Q + O_ > O CEC �Cm OaCEJ 0 ai O E 0- -c- a, 3: c rnmm 0 0 a 01 v al -pL tOl .� _0o c H o 0 O c a O > -E E c o ° o a) 0 3 N c y -0 o Cc a, o O a1 N C O }' H O aN+ f6 p C aJ Q Q �1 N o N N 7 O O N O CO -6 NI C p p o o ni Q � o_.� m � Q c _ ^ ° m - a a o � E —y m y > v a ^ ° > N ° m Y m Q.� o m O �I�I� 0 000000 Q) c oao o - o 0 Q �Y 0 o � 'o « o oiuu O C • o00000o E o Q .. o � o � e -C w 00o IIII -0 � 0 0 y 00 � CO M N w a � o 00 o c T N � � W � a o o 3 a coW o a « « m � N v v a M o _ N C nv .� 7 m .- s �. ,V., O m O — s v E w ' s N t F O .'^ p a, O N — v a N E � _ c .Q Q'p O O C 7 nT c Vl O aj o s 3 t v O c p O m O E � u _6 L in M L 06 Q 3 w v a, N m a, s v 00 a ° a > > .v ns °o 2 a m e s a m o a v v o rn .� U 3 F-- p c m O V uE N c V `^ I Ol ori C a7 H .. 2 m O a a s ''� m 3 N p c O o tO _ O ,� .c v N Q a p N H O : ar O_ E .y a) N L c v v Q O Q Yn 6 %mea M � ,t., � O to p III O_pc 9-v O O v o N -6 rp s% N V O_ v u a a N N a, o x 7 aJa� c a) to Z _ v '� v p o Q O t 3 W � W s O m — m pV_ O >. O c u O O Yn .� au a+ '� c a) — .+� C N C i6 C:) O -O c >s > R = 3 o ao .. xo o x v o o X 0 0 +� mm �.. m o ° mo ° a � o c 4�II N N tp •� F C N -O N O Y N C N > v O i N -'^ N C O c 'o N .n m p v N z .E °pu o N o N ar^a vi -0 Nv c N C N T C C C O Of6 O y 1,17J o o _Q o _(,D O in C — IV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qj M i � � O (p � N +NrO�� = o E Q to ��U JI 73 p 7 +i+ O O VI E n Q V O V v j O Q O � C a) a GGo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 N N o ai v L v — p v v o L LD) E ,o 3 a to T � Y Q d- al Q a1 4 al al t* rn t rn �* rn R v CD 0 ti c Ln L o o o o o m o m o o v+i p N v o Ln N N m m � v n n o o w m N > -o tiOJ v a — a E 1 -0 O O w —M w :37 L aJ L O Ln 3 0 -0 v 3 c T`gYphoihoihoihoihoihlolilhllolihoihpP�lhoihoihoy� r i r ililil o 14 I� ri isir� 'v m vi p ai °' 3 H 3 H s �- v VYVYY I L L j L E C C O O 0 v v aJ j L 4 L (0 Cu '++ Q v 0- ui , - O � � X aJ N _ w � •� O V NE N TCU N — (u E w O �Q ° V) V) `a) v _ f6 m C v _6 (6 N0 O -O m. C l +-' w i w _ .I Ol � V 7 � aJ O C O C A a1 i1 i IO 'E N p L T o 07 m eT_� E 3 Q Q c v a o' al Q 0 O Q T V o aJ E .� s O� V Q) w a) v a O c p O C a of 0 p C t i o c vcj o ° M-0 3 LR a a 3 4) `� 4) S +L+ T o t6 t6 @ 0 T C 6 uAM QJ a] -cc_ FE -2N V L C N O V 4 R 4 � In t6 N of Q Y p Y ,n m y o p v p (6 t 7 7 '6 vi T r° O v O 2 L/ m aJ H Ln V1 m CO in C S? C Q m 00 N 'O C A N N pl C p p� o o + L p p 4J t' L C:) a1 fp v O ca v m p N v C =° a) 3 v y `° Q Q CL o f Q . omo E p p oo O p v Q N L c6 co ti ry O C O E c6 C O S 7 fv -p V 4 C Y a1 p 7 N T—TO C 8 uA"u M V f om � 0 p p o is Ifw'ti N 7 0 0 of N 4 m ry V v f6 a) — .0 1 C N z O Dl 0 !_ l0 aJ L In mallc o C) 0 � � 0 3 � �° � o 'er O m Q Q m 0 7 �.. c m a) �w" o o o ow Q - O Y .L.+ N Q 110 C) o $ m N a o o m a �m o o a ¢ o E L Z a t � o N CL p N a p CL :3 a Q n a v E v M o o Q ti oD I'' O ry y ,� O uuw v w v DANA to N v Ol �m L a) C C c6 Z y C COof Y tiO F T._ In Z L C O U tv CD II'YI'W O ° i 9- 0, 8)- o v t >w QJ I o a o a omm 9� O ° O ' Iry m �v cOQ viC 41 O) O p Q 0- 4, O) QO ° S =01- O C O Fill R m 0 O N vN C, 0Q O OO rVoo,ti0 o +S-• 7 O O >' 61 v UIIII N O Q Q O L 9 ZT C vi Q N i m N T� S L -6 C Q) 6 L L u 0 `° °° O p -O C) CD !E <D CD ° °) wv o N N M N rl rl M 4 v o v L 1 v 4 O O ++ O 01 +L+ T 3 CO a0 O7 '- 4 L m O m C O C O a-+ v \ N OIII m O) F"^ C m p 7 30 O N Q O N Q N -,- L c-I O O 3: 'O L m m ,,1 c X O CL a) 0O ° mAp c- � Do O2 O Q Y u O a) O- 7 O OL O u O Q O O N of wlJfa N Cl N M M R 1-+ is 6 N T 01 Q v vl O v1 O ul O � vVo V 0) M V v O ^ a S c Ln L, Q ai oO ° > mv >o av, so aQ a _TN OOT OO °C > > V O to 25 C O � 9-L .� v 4 C T � .�- In .�-I V O � O V1 N a, 7 O S 00 i V V O 7 4 O C N C L O V O) _0 T S S N C +S+ V v 0 � O � 4 > ON Ln V NO �m., j +S+ E IIF^u M C C 7 V O w vVi 2 N C) O O Q C i1 Ln C O O .0 � .'^ 7 +L+ N -6 v C O V N m O S O x O C Q O "^'A &L O _ i -O C Q O . I, C V O ry E o a, E L u N a N N F V Q� L t o c Tui N Q V O a, p Q T p Q N V �O, O ° vVi O > �"� >> V N O N T S Cl)^ T fl� v — O N O in C N N S O C t 3 Y Q WhA o u m - a v v ^ M o m 3 > O v m cn O a) V Y '� 4 m O vi 4 u L Q'n 9 m 0 0 O V m c O v O p O Q p c m V 0 0 >, O Q O a) `) O) en O m -O 7 V n Y i^ c �e �, O n O Y vOi > Ln c T m O O V N .� m 4 o °` aj ~m o) t = Ln m � a o Qo o.� O 0O °Q OO -0 � LLo c 4VL an,u >, c4oooc0 O m m OO O Op CD c � a, 0 v m o R 1 aT>Oy ' .'tom Nm E � CD E p N � N � � O �v av �VN � O_4 N O L OC w 00 CD Nn C an i6 u'1 N 01 4, Q O v' ° N O ,� E 3 m 7 7 Y v N III�I�A O aJ Q V a1 O @ V O v 4 @ a, 0) ° Q ° V S O rr S O a, *' C N S m S V C51 C v V O V O — V N IFS',. H Q� m Ln 4 F- S F- �n rl v S .� Q m -6 Uj 'O i , a, vQ m -S� v a1- j ,5., >' O L m O m �O (6 C 7 i aS- C m 7 Vi cn O �pl� Z) m O S y V 11111�IU��I 1, O O rip o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o E 4�. 3 � -° i�Il�i. nni. LL �oLLmi. �ov� vmNNN 3 ° o y '> S S E O C N 7 OL al F- V Q O — m ti m N ti rn V �n io N m V oa vi 3 a, " h c N V N oo V N oo a rn v m v io CD C_ N •- 61 oa Nll� m rn r-i co r-i m m ti V io N ti Oo � vt vt V W m I� r` Oi fV lV W V vt Oi N v ° m Q m !�JJ O l0 vl vl m O n W O m n n 7 N Q E m 7 m 0 O O v1 O v1 O� v1 W m v O O 7 L 7 M O O T E Lr) V � m V VO L IIIIINI' o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-A 2 ° °- a, m Lr r r v1 t0 CO Ol CO t0 �D V M N N N c v T N O v -0 0 a, m 0 0 c C C m L ° M L�/1 M M rl LD �!1 lD N V1 M W N M M d vt lD N O CO M 6l N M S M vt O� W pO C ° •— L,L ,.;/(V o0 i0 N LP M O t0 .--I N ti t0 Ni N tLi I� l0 V N N, O Q N O L E 0) IY JX Ol Ol O Ove � Omm v >a Y � y L) Ln m 3 S 0 1 E °' & 1 L T ° °- i a, 3 B"1C Ol O ~ -0a) e "V.N" rz 7 V Q) O Q a) N A.. an N L N O O E L, SII O p -a Ln O Q p v O) C O A 01 V Ol R 01 R 01 R 01 R o1 R 01 R d L tL C m N M M V V Ul Ln lD �D f� n + v ac, �' CD 3 p E v ac oc a J10 � ti N �m m 6v v Ln L�ni � � ' 00 ro 2 > E N m E > lO i L o 0 O .- + S .` V in m -O S o Q y a um 4;4°a Cu O r- a) a) O 'W t uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuupppmuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuul 11 IIII VV M... 0 @ Y E m Qi tZ C,CD Qi 2, o +. E iJ O C O a) T w r6 C +l C C a) N t6 vi 1 3 m o O O31 N L N o v > 0 0) O a) O-, lA Q 0 N y N N 0 a � Cc: ice-+ N CDC ° i1 zf� C:), c _ o a o 73 M -C o ac Y s g II tea) u 11 Ih^^ a) E U) a Z m a>i o o >, c JO c E m ° > >' ° '° E a a, E m s � 0 0 -0 w M TE a, °' c c v 0- a) a) a) -O p) k2v O r a) a7:� Y .� O c o@ 0 0 c al v o 0 o v o v o E •� a°, O voi v o\° o Oo u rn vNi v v p w N 1111111 111 1111111 @III III � "'' y N C ,T Y > CL N v Op '� m '� U N ca ptZ•v O p N ° U CN SC N O -cmO ..� O O O T O o N .� IIII O '—^ N -, -O o Q) o c x IIII IIII•. E o > .E ° m N v °,I .° Q N v - O m a a E 0 a0 v v o� m }n o N > o v > s �, T O c ° tT� ° c c .� tO v' O c , > -6 0 7 -E Ih, t ro v, c \ s-, ca in t�ii cu c�a mmj O' c o >, > a) N E O 4 VIII a M�M� p N ^� v Ol > ss N IPMm EO `a o a) vl ,<r m v w : � IM e o 0 0 S E v c o o ° ° III Uh a) v v c C 0) C: U a) 6 ra Y N R I"n O 0- .LD Q Qs o) �° )O s00ii + - ° 0 s R �O aj E C °�° v a � � o ro � v Iii (v 0 0 0 0 >, s 0 '� t ° �6GA d O N Q Q CN 4 H -C in 0 H r^ o a) a) a) a) O c c a) N T y L E N L 0 O_�M1����gli�lll� ���� lill''ll 911'11 E 0 ; s a t ° a) c -63 v Cc tl 0 O> '06 ccL a .� 0 7 m +� s a) o m ca w c Im m C C O C Ln a) •� a .� T C � a) - N � ' N •v _ 4 N E N vii cuN O O_ 0 0 .L ry o 0 3 ai q o m Z5 Mmw i v o' O O %�1' Sp rp Ol 7 r°1a -,iN ll1 cUa � pl C „dl p a s a1 c p L �. o o v O 'cm O a ca m is aj F — ca . ° is m m -F _ m Q a) c C C C ra O c Ol O 0 I t E O O ra a) — O_ 0 m aj O C 4N o a T u Z o -0 u p_ al Q T aL., O_ p O T V al O Ol ��. O s c o o a 3 a o + — �e a) w c N Y ate-+ to to N n + L O_ C p N C V7 N 7 D1 C: 7;C- o a o E % C 0 4 G 6 a t O i 7 0) - 'c Q 01 s1 a) N v a) fp rnv1 Qj 0 (6 � -US O O v L O N N -6 ti3: o Om o 0) Q m F Ol rn -0 E M o m a T a) 21 a) a) T _ "� IP�I�IIVIIIIII�II�I�I �I�IIII C .5.+ — .5.+ C 4 a) CO 1 g,ll N qy,'y O C OO T s N 0 T m 4 — N S C Y L i I w IA � N � � �-� � vNi p O N O J N N N N C O N N 7 a t 121.S V7 O a) S O C N > Q v u N rn Q a -0 s _ m C O L •a ° a o a c N s z o m o 9: N ^ -0 Ln a) ° S p -Cp N Q Vp _ ° Q O- C s O (1) o — o S a s a a p o s v V s Q v > Q ._ C 7 C a Y N c T C N O C — al ..,� OV 'O w . co � p v O o Ln v m .'� 3 •N ai a) N Y o m F t t s .0 Q :3 u Q 4 O L m o o ~ V Ua c t i � O m s IMA � a) -C m a) _ � C Q) II�u" III C i�"�iijl I u�� N Y O V al O_ p al a) C O O i N 7 al n. x O a O ° o o m c a O S ,N S N S S ���, In Q_N S C N O O_S m N C T N 'O (D C -0 N N N a) .– -0 N 0) a) C C s IIID ^ S164 O O C co N —T 7 > N v O T aJ N ON N ,�6 S SE m v O O O O_ N C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o c Q m o N o w,(ry 00 o m m U) N Op� 7 �O M > 7 O Q Q C �1J71� O T N aO+ o N C C N Dl T In E Oto N m o O c c C >. v V , > Q_ I O C v) C C _ S O y N vpi aJ T �6 Q -cp > N l�n Oi O O M oa O O h M W l0 a L -Q Q_ O_� C C a) Q N C C w U l0 T N M Vl I� ci Vl O� O M V F 7 N ) M O aO+ S °o 0o rn m o0 0o rn rn co rn m co w m U) C aQ p m +' U N w C p a y m N >> Q 7 a) O C E Q Q F tm O_ vi V O u 11A -Q > N O m U C C > Z a) O a) a) Q N t ai a) O O L N N —0 > M p .0 N a C 51 N N N � N > S S y Q R NE N a) m m w 2 = Ln L, L, ul H 2 ^"^� N O a) D � O u a) 7 m Y N -0 "' S s > O CS) O O N O v v C m S S S 'N S Z c6 .v_' .v_' m v C s s s m 0 °0 7 am —am m �l E E -I-- ro .Ls .c s O -6 C Ov N °� m N m N c v 'm Q C > o o v v m o s o @ s C C C aJ Ql 3 v o Ol N _ O a) a) C Q m Vl V t4 N v N C> Q v7 N y0 V(N N o C) S S S m S N 3 O fl' m .0 4 Ql C C o m m ,� >, N C v� >, N �O N Ql O d`rr g s o > a" > o am) zi 00 a m = ' a ^ O Q-6 C S V) V > m Q 00 Q m a) C C ; O C L CO LT sir O m Q L-0 n; C > V O c c C O Q O c .N m � ao po o °rc� ® Il�lf, ' o cOa Q vii ai m Y m N Jij )r�i % ria N �n oo O m o u Q N °' o �� O m m a a) N pi 3 > N Q,� N o N i, ° Fa m c a) s 4"Mi .�' Y pl Ql N U In w m 6 Q U) p O 0 UY r4 O � w m C C V p N Q r paj 0 Vm N@ .o–I �off°?O S >m E N H C Z m M Q T m N ^ � � �. _ /i�`; ,� v yl�ll�lo 111 Pirul�l"P(irolrl rlflfw{II'0flli�l 111 lflffYroi(a.... w� � � rllrl nrlrf�ff'i6d I°i°� r c �a m r � r r -77 G mm 0 i ao mv �w a �dlu rya c c c c zm a, @ a, v aJ w o p v -° v I -a C c c v a _ ° o 'o E o ° av o o ^ a E ° mo o � O V ° o o 6).0 S 4 = C o O N Q �n - C N 'C N O M 3 - o o Q 3 T�O O Q o O Vl +S+ Q C C v y m -0 O u \ C v l0 T� p N C -p m .N Q Q v U a 0 u v a, 9 CC c E � 3 0 0 `: Qv v 0. 3 v Q V c p 0 v E N u 3 p co C N v x v LE v D o � c 0 E N ° _ O41 U a 00 T p •p a O^ Qpo > ° > Q oo7 O ° c6O p N C N E u O im Q N m •}, - p -6 CO °gip N O m 0 O C rp S C .0 C .O C Q U1 ° � a > '" 0 0 0 0 Q Q o� Q o m ' a P Z m N o O ¢ t U., C � C ON `J �-I o N � a) � ¢ v O O n a \ 2 QCD •tC-n O N O u N ov\° Q C al u > rl C -O O C O N rn N p u E C lfl & C � 3 - C -O , m -6 p Q Q-10 E R a)t- Q—' as Q o U c = > a,- asY v N m o a, -0 u u y p a s Q S C a) 01 a N C NC a) C Q N a) r6 C m c6 +S- t0 O 'C O N C v aI S S aO+ O C NaS-+ m 7 C O N `--I to to p 7m��� p C QJ L Vi pl C) — S N a) 0 -o 0 Q co _ E v o = 'Cc �e ¢ Y 3 a C O CID C R V _ V N — C S aJ C .� N CO W .� Y v, O 4 U Q E m j Y C w .11) a ca C 7 0 n3 �.. ° Q 0)o Q m ° ° Q ° ° V) 3 v v o o 1 S aS-+ m N Q i R Ln 2 ri m 05 aS-+ Q pl-0 2 .� V) C .� m 4 .� N i IIIIUIJ�o a o m 0 0 0 0 o c aCi v io p v P. N M N p fl N W ti O p O @ N ID N 7 p ° > - Cc: N O ti o o o o o F- s v C 0 7 M �f$I n m m N N io �n N ti N Lr,S C O O N N IIID O a1 Y '�i,L� W M M rl N iD a N tD O rl Q 7 a) � —a) iS-+ C L a/ ro; tiC y aJ Ol C II�11)) C 00 a) 61 ajt rl 7 0 a) tip '81 O C U 7 /� o o 0 o a o o c s ac m y t N"4U W Wv O O Q O C D O CO N 00 ci al 7 O j )' N —4 v O N ° Q 0� E v all O a O O QUi L O Ol 7 0 N N cyi U a) v� ra C a) �n -6 �n E N a v c c c ~ O � s E .L C d 7 s C V ° 3 7 0 V v r¢ O Oa 0 s y O ~ ra m Y3 7 16„nM u 3 .3 0 0 e T o ns E E O 00 `v In M r, 3 O 7 Q p -O S ate+ Ol O O \ Ul a) o O C = v of aO r) C C F N N C F 0 C m ao oaa2 = c N a 'N o � V O v C Q O O U -6 Y U V N p O O °J S r4 = �-- C T Y O V) LIE f E o o iv `6 a `° p p o f m 7 m V o ero 2 0 h s v E v 3 u v n t 'n as - an c Il Yl u i Y i y (O ail 0)p N (I fINAIf @ i911 III f��i in Y uV IN _ 1 w > Q OO ry(R:1 C N c ra n .. ..... Cr! aJ V1 U 00 M a > c v Y O 3 Q N 7 W Q N N Ol v Vl � O � S w 1 3 o O - o — s-a — — u v o o c v o w c c c v a 3 No IRNA p Z t v O .� N N p _ ry, c > !? Qin Q 0 o 10 O N s w N pv _ N to v A dl v, v O Q p 0 m w c al ai v ID N Q C N w O , v ° 3 .2 c -v, _ o N � n- u > Q w.a'q m c O N v Q a1 N E w &mmN cc OY N c c uWh O fl- O o I A cm r-4 V N Oc ° 6l \ Cl L w O N 7 O o ra m Lrn O O v � O C m u�WA C O a al O C p 0 L S o r6 61 O 7 — ra 4,„A RPA, V p N V lD Q 6l lD O N Q IIW V S z v V In rl V In IP�N'�, Q ._ F to L Q o �'� ( IV Vr'lu'iNYV YVuI Irr w6ri tr Vrrf 14Y YVh'idr' v v v ED is �O N p O N 0 0 ca v 3 Y C O O OQ.� qr. c m O v N 0 CL Lrl c o c C N o O aJ c ! N > c ai c v v o v of +s in a O o f -0 a o O C:)Q.X O0 Q m C L v c i ° O v L` o VQj IV -0N A a,8 0 ' O c Q O p _ 01 O N N Q wN uUA .L.-P Y u° ¢ � 3 ai cd cz� U n 3 ra C �0 O s j Ol oa o-m c c a c ns V al Q > y c c y p a 4� 3 c L a mA a> > ,� Y II O O Q W1 N Y O aJ LO O II�NA N ° Y c V Y Q CL o > c o QOC:)CD CD " v �I D z ° o o o c' o 0 Ln V 4 -1 00 Q > c o oc- v v > � O c II Q ra -a v ° a) O c C, 0 Y C Q >,V v o Q N ti c Mc 3myV > oNi � o � rill sv c ate-+ L ate+ Q Q c o c .� O M u Qj o O c = c 'c v C C .� C m 3 c o c rjc a v o aj CU m m e ro O c E m N v Z rat .c c o Q �., o v, s o E v O o QF Q c n a Q a s Q Q m Ou M rca rca rn � F�mm u =3 O +' CCLc o C ra v ra c ai R N Q c Cl O N RM. c CL N N U"{N m 4 y p >. IPS' Q— Z m O c � ° N O y� c N.^�.. c . co:,-J V - c 4 c Y c F c „Pimm 7 cc O 7 PSS D O c ca 4"�II PW o U p p w M- °�V •n" 'y .� v .� 4 " v a a� N � Y M � v � .� '> > f o Q c a o o v +� +� _ mi '.�.. "�A O 7 y N O u^M'�N c i 7 .61 C) '^ Q Qj 9- c o s o 0 0 °' o �° z s o a Qcn .- Qo aOoc U-V) V Q° u F V O aJ WCD 0 V V A OO a ❑ to fu a ^ N Q N In C 'Au O O +�" VI VI VI Vf VI N V� c c c N Q N N a C C c C '— aJ aJ v v � v v v V v a; v a N S v a) a) aJ ,p a) H . t 0 0 0 0 4 o m o o c & \ > cv ra ca a) m O v al N L p Z v u v v v a a a o a \ Q 0 p m 3 m m .Z m m a' °' - c � a � a � x ai ai ai rp d ai Cov a x_ � o � v = v v v ° , V v u ° ° v ° ° 'c ° c ° ❑ c m o cm c H c E �0, c c u —r:: O tai a p v '} a v v m v i cc u E N U E LiJ u E +S, i6 Q C �— an in In Q Q E 3 CL 3 a ° Q ' v I c v c ° v = 3 v a v v u v p v p O ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ = \ ❑ v v vi a Q vi E a vi n 4 vi .n vi -, O 'C V S d J Q -c m t O Z � c0 - 7 3 �_ Q aJ : � n 5 O O al O c U m ° E m O O am Jo v wx ° M D w00 "i v a � OO 06 06 O O O � gaa aas zO O O O H O N 4 -6 ai W H m o O O O c C C C m a N O CO° T 'm° a S� O c c c c N O Q Q H c c O c c Hl c p Z a a a d d i � rz c = c o c 0 0 0 o i v `� O mra m � v \ w v c c E a> > o v c v v v v v c ° c E E E E E ' a 11 a c v c o o O N v a a) 2 Q a K K c6 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ " 6d m „ ❑ a z vm U _ o o a R c c E c c c a w C,- c R o a ° o c o s 11 rn a a , R ami Z3 va a �T n ap o ° 7 o Q ° a @ R ivi aoa`4 JO z U Z z in vs vQ in 2 11n 'O Q c a1 = a1 'Q C aJ in N N v Q Q f6 T Y -Q N a-• Vhf Q Q � � a-+ � p Y Qi S c C _ c O C O p Q Q N M Q 4 � L V -6 01 'n Y c 3 o O c v O a) s-Mm -C ^ N -Q - +T' `CF- to c -6 L '6 aJ Ol to p c Q Q is Q v E a-� L N v 61L O U U R O M O-� O ~ O �n �n L N 3 0 Ol is lD Q D Ln c Q) O N .c pl O N co O O T L v c C v uN"u ON _ u m � N C c v N T C: M O 'ti aJ S Q C b4 c0, m b4 VtrN Q NCL C O an L V '� Y c m v > all O c O_2 >`V .� O O 7 f0 c O ,o j 3 Vl CZE T c E is 0 O -0 C E C v O VCD c j RO 7 L v ip y t s c 0 v u c > lQJ 4N V C u Op i c O ++ N T pIIIIA N t.., C Q_ Y u^ N y inc is Y > 0 a) Qc Q� - c 0) emaa , o > o u o v7�1 $ — TNCvaL OQQ -ncoNQ 00 mtC7 Q mo 0) 73 00 o v 7 v > > IA =Q v o o a Q mIU Y >E M0 7 O a) Lr) Q,' u v > Q yo0 O c N 'cd > =; y � y c v Q v r fl_ o ct — v 06 =; V ME= 4Uzi= G EM General Information Site Information ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst SWE Intersection CR 48 @ Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. LKMA Jurisdiction Town of Southold ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Date Performed 2/20/2018 East/West Street North Road(CR 48) ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,....,,,,,,............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period(hrs) 0.25 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Description Vineyard Vines Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. of ar r:,,a�J We,J Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume,V(veh/h) 626 4 4 552 11 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles(%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade(%) 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................,........................................................................ Right Turn Channelized No No No No ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Base Critical Headway(sec) 4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway(sec) 4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway(sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Flow Rate,v(veh/h) 4 24 Capacity,c(veh/h) 903 255 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.09 95%Queue Length,Qss(veh) 0.0 0.3 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.0 20.6 ................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................-�`4................................ Level of Service,LOS A C Approach Delay(s/veh) 0.1 20.6 Approach LOS C Copyright©2018 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved. HCS7"TWSC Version 7.4 Generated:2/22/2018 9:23:51 AM Build AM Peak.xtw ME= GUzi= G EM General Information Site Information ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst SWE Intersection CR 48 @ Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. LKMA Jurisdiction Town of Southold ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Date Performed 2/20/2018 East/West Street North Road(CR 48) ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.85 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,....,,,,,,............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period(hrs) 0.25 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Description Vineyard Vines Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. of ar r:,,a�J We,J Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume,V(veh/h) 742 11 9 778 8 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles(%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade(%) 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized No No No No ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Base Critical Headway(sec) Critical Headway(sec) Base Follow-Up Headway(sec) Follow-Up Headway(sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Flow Rate,v(veh/h) 11 16 Capacity,c(veh/h) 759 124 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.13 95%Queue Length,Qss(veh) 0.0 0.4 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.8 38.3 ................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................-�`4................................ Level of Service,LOS A E Approach Delay(s/veh) 0.4 38.3 Approach LOS E Copyright©2018 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved. HCS7"TWSC Version 7.4 Generated:2/22/2018 9:36:43 AM Build PM Peak(0.85 PHF).xtw ME= 4Uzi= G EM General Information Site Information ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analyst SWE Intersection CR 48 @ Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Agency/Co. LKMA Jurisdiction Town of Southold ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Date Performed 2/20/2018 East/West Street North Road(CR 48) ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis Year 2019 North/South Street Proposed Site Dwy ................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Time Analyzed Build Midday Sat Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,....,,,,,,............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period(hrs) 0.25 ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Project Description Vineyard Vines Lanes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ' of ar r:,,a�J We,J Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR LT LR Volume,V(veh/h) 854 6 5 653 S 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles(%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade(%) 0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. Right Turn Channelized No No No No ................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Base Critical Headway(sec) 4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway(sec) 4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway(sec) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway(sec) 2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ................................................................................................................................................................................. .......................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .................................................................. ............................... ............................... ...............................I ........................... .......................... ................................,................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... Flow Rate,v(veh/h) 5 11 Capacity,c(veh/h) 728 161 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.07 95%Queue Length,Qss(veh) 0.0 0.2 Control Delay(s/veh) 10.0 29.0 ................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................-�`4................................ Level of Service,LOS A D Approach Delay(s/veh) 0.2 29.0 ................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................. Approach LOS D Copyright©2018 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved. HCS7"TWSC Version 7.4 Generated:2/22/2018 9:22:33 AM Build Midday Sat Peak.xtw NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Design Manual Appendix 5C Intersection Sight Distance Charts January 15th, 2015 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 1/15/15 APPENDIX 5C INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE CHARTS Contents Page 5C.1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... C1 5C.2 DESIGNER INSTRUCTIONS....................................................................................... C1 5C.3 REFERENCES............................................................................................................. C1 List of Figures, Forms, and Tables U.S. Customary Figures: Table 5C-1 Length of Sight Triangle Leg — Case A— No Traffic Control .................. C2 Table 5C-2 Adjustment Factors for Sight Distance Based on Approach Grade........ C2 Table 5C-3 Design Intersection Sight Distance - Case B1 ....................................... C3 Table 5C-4 Design Intersection Sight Distance - Cases B2 and B3 ......................... C3 Table 5C-5 Length of Sight Triangle Leg along Major Road - Case C1 .................... C4 Table 5C-6 Length of Minor Road Leg - Case C1 .................................................... C5 Table 5C-7 Design Intersection Sight Distance - Case C2....................................... C5 Table 5C-8 Design Intersection Sight Distance - Case F ......................................... C5 1/15/15 APPENDIX 5C INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE CHARTS 5C.1 INTRODUCTION Intersection sight distance is an important design consideration for new projects as well as rehabilitation of existing facilities. The designer should refer to HDM 5.9.5 for complete background information and designer instructions. This Appendix presents charts that can be used to determine intersection sight distance for most common types of intersections. The data presented in Appendix C was either obtained directly or calculated from formulas in Section 9.5.3 of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011 (AASHTO Green Book). 5C.2 DESIGNER INSTRUCTIONS This appendix covers six types of intersections: • Case A- No traffic control • Case B - Stop control on the minor road • Case C—Yield control on the minor road • Case D —Traffic signal control (no charts provided) • Case E —All way stop control (no charts provided) • Case F— Left turns from the major road The designer should refer to HDM Exhibit 5-27 to determine the appropriate table to use for the type of intersection being analyzed. For Case D (Traffic Signal Control) and Case E (All Way Stop Control) there are generally no approach or departure sight triangles needed. These intersections are usually installed in locations that because of site conditions, lack adequate intersection sight distance. For these two cases, no additional information is provided within Appendix C. For all Non-Freeway 2R and Non-Freeway 3R projects; for minor commercial and residential driveways, refer to HDM Chapter 7, Exhibit 7-7 Minimum Stopping Sight Distance (SSD). The recommended design speed is Actual Design Speed minus 20 mph. Table 5C-2 contains factors to adjust the intersection sight distance based on the approach grade. These factors are only used for Case A- no control or Case C— yield control. 5C.3 REFERENCES 1. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 444 North Capital Street, N.W., Suite 249, Washington, D.C. 20001. 2. Highway Design Manual: Design Division, New York State Department of Transportation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12232. Page C1 1/15/15 Table 5C-1 Length of Sight Triangle Le -Case A-No Traffic Control Design Speed Length of Leg (mph) ft 15 70 20 90 25 115 30 140 35 165 40 195 45 220 50 245 55 285 60 325 65 365 70 405 Note: For approach grades greater than 3%, multiply the sight distance values in this table by the appropriate adjustment factor in Table 5C-2. Table 5C-2 Adjustment Factors for Sight Distance Based on Approach Grade Approach Design Speed (mph) grade M 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 -6 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 -5 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 -4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 -3 to +3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 +4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 +5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 +6 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1/15/15 APPENDIX 5C INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE CHARTS Table 5C-3 Design Intersection Sight Distance in feet -Case 131 - Left Turn From Stop Design Passenger Car Single-Unit Truck Combination Truck speed Lanes Crossed Lanes Crossed Lanes Crossed (mph) 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 15 170 180 190 210 225 245 255 270 285 20 225 240 250 280 300 325 340 360 380 25 280 295 315 350 375 405 425 450 475 30 335 355 375 420 450 485 510 540 570 35 390 415 440 490 525 565 595 630 665 40 445 475 500 560 600 645 680 720 760 45 500 530 565 630 675 725 765 810 855 50 555 590 625 700 750 805 850 900 950 55 610 650 690 770 825 885 930 990 1045 60 665 710 750 840 900 965 1015 1080 1140 65 720 765 815 910 975 1045 1100 1170 1235 70 775 825 875 980 1050 1125 1185 1260 1330 Table 5C-4 Design Intersection Sight Distance (in feet) -Case B2 - Right Turn From Stop and - Case B3 -Crossing Maneuver Passenger Car Single-Unit Truck Combination Truck Design Case B2--Lane Entered Case B2--Lane Entered Case B2--Lane Entered Speed Case B3—Lanes Crossed Case B3—Lanes Crossed Case B3—Lanes Crossed (mph) 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 15 145 155 170 190 205 220 235 250 265 20 195 210 225 250 275 295 310 330 350 25 240 260 280 315 340 365 390 415 440 30 290 310 335 375 410 440 465 495 525 35 335 365 390 440 475 510 545 580 615 40 385 415 445 500 545 585 620 660 700 45 430 465 500 565 610 655 695 745 790 50 480 515 555 625 680 730 775 825 875 55 530 570 610 690 745 805 850 910 965 60 575 620 665 750 815 875 930 990 1050 65 625 670 720 815 880 950 1005 1075 1140 70 670 725 775 875 950 1020 1085 1155 1225 Page C3 1/15/15 Table 5C-5 Length of Sight Triangle Leg (in feet) Along Major Road - Case C1 -Crossing Maneuver at Yield Controlled Intersections Major road Passenqer car design Minor-road desi n speed (mph) speed 15 20-50 55 60 65 70 (mph) 15 150 145 150 155 160 165 20 200 195 200 205 215 220 25 250 240 250 255 265 275 30 300 290 300 305 320 330 35 345 335 345 360 375 385 40 395 385 395 410 425 440 45 445 430 445 460 480 490 50 495 480 495 510 530 545 55 545 530 545 560 585 600 60 595 575 595 610 640 655 65 645 625 645 660 690 710 70 690 670 690 715 745 765 Major road Single unit truck design Minor-road design s eed (moh) speed 15 20-50 55 60 65 70 (mph) 15 170 150 155 160 165 170 20 225 200 205 210 220 225 25 280 250 255 265 275 280 30 335 300 310 315 325 335 35 390 350 360 370 380 395 40 445 400 410 420 435 450 45 500 450 460 475 490 505 50 555 500 510 525 545 560 55 610 550 560 580 595 615 60 665 600 615 630 650 670 65 720 650 665 685 705 725 70 775 700 715 735 760 785 Major road Combination truck design Minor-road desi n speed (mph) speed 15 20-50 55 60 65 70 (mph) 15 240 205 175 180 180 185 20 320 275 235 235 240 245 25 400 345 290 295 300 305 30 480 410 350 355 360 370 35 560 480 405 410 420 430 40 640 550 465 470 480 490 45 720 615 520 530 540 550 50 800 685 580 590 600 610 55 880 755 635 645 660 675 60 960 820 695 705 720 735 65 1040 890 750 765 780 795 70 1120 960 810 820 840 855 Note:For minor-road approach grades that exceed 3%,multiply the design value by the appropriate adjustment factor from Table 5C-2. 1/15/15 APPENDIX 5C INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE CHARTS Table 5C-6 Length of Minor Road Leg (in feet) -Case C1 -Crossing Maneuvers from Yield Controlled Approaches Design Speed 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (mph) Length of Leg 75 100 130 160 195 235 275 320 370 420 470 530 (feet) Notes: Values shown are for a passenger car crossing a two-lane highway with no median and grades 3 percent or less. For minor-road approach grades that exceed 3 percent, multiply the distance by the appropriate adjustment factor from Table 5C-2. Table 5C-7 Design Intersection Sight Distance (in feet) -Case C2- Left or Right Turn at Yield Controlled Intersections Passenger Car Single-Unit Truck Combination Truck Design speed Left Turn - Lanes Crossed Left Turn - Lanes Crossed Left Turn - Lanes Crossed (mph) (Right Turn— Enter Lane 1) (Right Turn— Enter Lane 1) (Right Turn— Enter Lane 1) 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 15 180 190 200 225 240 255 265 285 300 20 240 250 265 295 315 340 355 375 395 25 295 315 335 370 395 420 445 470 495 30 355 375 400 445 475 505 530 565 595 35 415 440 465 515 555 590 620 655 690 40 475 500 530 590 630 675 710 750 790 45 530 565 600 665 710 755 795 845 890 50 590 625 665 735 790 840 885 935 985 55 650 690 730 810 870 925 975 1030 1085 60 710 750 795 885 945 1010 1060 1125 1185 65 765 815 860 960 1025 1090 1150 1215 1285 70 825 875 930 1030 1105 1175 1235 1310 1380 Table 5C-8 Design Intersection Sight Distance (in feet) -Case F - Left Turns From the Major Road Passenger Car Single-Unit Truck Combination Truck Design speed Lanes Crossed Lanes Crossed Lanes Crossed (mph) 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 15 125 135 145 145 160 175 170 185 200 20 165 180 195 195 215 235 225 245 265 25 205 225 240 240 265 295 280 305 330 30 245 265 290 290 320 350 335 365 395 35 285 310 335 335 375 410 390 425 460 40 325 355 385 385 425 465 445 485 525 45 365 400 430 430 480 525 500 545 590 50 405 445 480 480 530 585 555 605 655 55 445 490 530 530 585 640 610 665 720 60 490 530 575 575 640 700 665 725 785 65 530 575 625 625 690 755 720 785 855 70 570 620 670 670 745 815 775 845 920 Page C5 1/15/15 00 N oc -- O N Nv N bA hi � N C3 o o Q Z W o N w � z 0 w � o d C4 o d o En 1,3 u? O a� tb CJ owl �- G C s O c w w a a v ice. iii a �; 'hq a - un tb p� � m. oc �-i < z a aCaOa It QOcG � a H U W .4 W r O a F, v W aF c0 Z c4a a0 ? .° z z d N w p 0 r� a00.� z W p z c4 Or >, `-�. c'� i, c3 F" v P. Y o -a �", v � � a o w � � a o w v � o � � � av o � U ° U v o w o o w d v U o x U o r a z O ❑ o ° o ° o U w o a z O o o UO o W o 0 o Z TnW � v� vo Tn yo cd 4.1 M � 00 N -- p N N � N cC N a °J > > w > � 0 0 0 o Q z Q vz x z q Nz 70. H CCS M W M H W M a -i� O R p � p U z p p N Caw N U NcCw o Nc� w N � wW .4 �� � ¢ z � ODU � � .. � o •. O� � � �, .. OU z z o z O a oroaoq o3 0 EQ 530Q ED o o F o F 00 ° O d vi > d d C4bb ¢ j Q x W x tb ¢ �I o p _ p o .� F" � •ti o � � �o 46 t v II Ln W p o a a un a U P.4 Ca � W Uo µ�j W O � ti W O Q W z v = W z W z Q � W ¢ z a It a a ¢ x a ¢ z a ¢ IQ a � z QOF" a cGO x � a F QOM � a H n QOM O' v Wim ¢ v a O nW x ¢ E v - v5w H a v W Ca H C7 C, nW a q F v C7 d x Ca H v L7 ¢ a x C/1 awp zp 0p 000 z _ d v ° a v w v o o v ° ° ° m a v w o ¢ ° U1 o U .p o 0 ¢ w f� a u� ( 0 0 ¢ w a ° U � o o ¢ w o U Ud o J � z O o ❑ x � U ¢ o a� z p d 5 � U ¢ ow a� z O c o aUd 'o O `n F" rO a'"iv�a ¢ °s.' �' vO a'"irna ¢ o `� aniO y u ¢ a ° C o mo o d Z Q a d z Q o o d z Q a d a c o d z f:) a O Uph ¢ F� xW U � wHdHxa U � o ¢ H 0 0 W V � V) W c V) fG—i N .. N O H S N O p ,.y N O �p •� > 7 00 N -- 0 N M O N cC N y ° o Q Q q � zw w 70. 44 U ✓' ."i, 'O a7 � '" rv'i 'O a� O .O 'II O � 'v '� W �. [A CC hA W b O o U 01 Cq ami o W s7 .4 a V7 a O a Vl a bq py n ,y ,y a v1 O C, En Q o3. 0 h � i aWOE a. W q a4 F� 7 O O O W O O O W W Qz x w otb o ao t t II Q ¢ a' � N a F, ,-� o a .�, a & 0 � v Q a U a a un W z W W O Sq a d U 114 oc U ca + a F O x c7 Q F W W W W Wl O W ERa W W �- � `a yQz a a yhz U U F" a H t a O � � a H a acGO � � a O a� a HALL � v ° OafW � ¢ O a F~ Ca a d � qF" wWW W xQF" dCn c 0 � Z � W .a F" � O Z H � c4 W F" � O � a ¢ O U ° C-4 U ° U ° •° g n d — U U o .� g d b �� U ° U s3 •° ° U 'E 'O o � d' C� � � cd o � °J � a a o 0 o o d w a o U u o w o o d w Z ❑ U `+-� w z z U w w z Z n N d C ° F7 a° O a 2 ° ° ° °�' GL °J LL J awcn¢ Hza° U z Q w � u � ¢ Ha u z Q a ¢ z Q a ° o va v V) N yN � N N T L� � L) > U r 00 N -- p N � O N cC N H W H O o Ojy Z b N O H z —0 = v> b > o ° y �_ O O W N 3-i C4 N O Q W aaC U W W O W H O O � O ^ U rr oA S 0 d y ° m b a Cl. W ; y > o N o � F• V4 3 w w hA a cC° w a oa a a z w ° a W ° oa a cC cd HO o un Ey z q w E FW Z i W Z p sem, u' a � z oa z va z o a U a � z a H � W � bCL, oy o � � `� � z a H � W `� � a axF" �" W w aqQ C7 H Q d p4 � TCaF" Q d M -4 �:lo O O U a00.2z C4pO.� a o 3 p Z p O a00.� z O a v a y z Z O U b a pa Z m o o d o aU Oa 0. w 00 ¢ � a z 0 o SvUyww ° z 0 o Oo a ro � oov UQww p z 0 o o w Cl v a o w ° a o v a Vj cm m a Q Z Q c p4 U T 5 0 0 Z Q c o p w w ° 6D ~ N '~ .. t4N .. 00 N -- p N Vl O N cC N 44 7 70. x x w QD S z � w " z49 y o w Boa a x w a y a o aa, c a v n a E- w wQ a wo qh 4. ° Md p w U O w U p F4 vi d Hani q W b`' q W ani W °' ani F p •`�' F o 'a � � � a w W p H o O w o O w M� I Q a ui a H uj W •a H a 52 a W � a U � �? � a aahz x p aw acG � � Oa F a aq� � 0a H a0a ? a P� a3wzd v a � 3w � v w pa � WP. a' w W, Z a O c4 ZpO ,o � 3 O p w aOp.? Z w p z� zOp .oz o G., U w U o cC U N a V w U o cC'V ° 0.a J W V V c3 •U ° U z p o o o vi Zvi � O a`"iri w o bA ° ww ¢� a44< a z Q a x Y x .x 0 � N N N U M M > U N M 00 N -- p N �p O N ^cCN C4 W4 x d z x z H H w 6 O N z q HE C7 v C, .+ O O Q- d a W yU E a .a 0 0 d � v n un �z ° oma ° O ; oo yq mq yq (� wH w a w O W o O w o a O W o d d y W d W cGa W d ani 14 W ai o a -oP,El q �- Q o �1 ° C-4 C, a H CL4O W as H q o q � =, o °' w o � � � w o •• � � F x o as Q z � wq a z LL, z w -" a, x, U w W Fcw7 � Q d Cc)ddzzqz d � v ° qv aq OW ? a x O a C7 O °" v QOcG � r�� P� a >" v wc4d a � ac4Q q a x � � wc4d d d F ., xgF d w F dqF wF ., xgF w c4 a o w C w w ? C/1 � � cl W14 2W z z 0 0. Z U o � ' C4 L; � 2 U .° ° b o U U .o o U •° ° o d o U w cB ca U O Ga v o d w p o U v o d w o U v o d w v o d w p o U •,�• � � � O � P. � cid o � � � a� � � O � � O. � c�a 0 � � �' � ¢�, � a U z A a d z Q a da ¢ Hc� a 0 o p w w ° w � � V kn c 4 N ,� N N N , t.� 4 O O p U N ti 00 N -- p N � O N cC N M w x M 70. kc,O M Q kn e H W ~ .y W o " N � xa U Qa 0 0 � •-- � oUUw �, .. o� a. w � � Qz3 � E v ' QzE z3 E u W .� a U w � z yaz v �Q z con O V1 7A ti v1 J ay CIO O o ° U U � E w- li:5E kC) kC) Wq WH a WH a a to Ca W t10 44 to H x Q o .� � o o •� a o � � � o � d o , °. �1 0 U q w u C7 a W a x w H0 � o u W HO x Q p = q W Z V Q W `" � QO � � a H aQa H cGO � � a Py v W r v W W H a O v W H d xQH zaxQH w � � xQH Cn °z o azaoo.� z° w o aoo .� ° 3 0 zoo.� oz 3 a oU a oUy a y Uy a y 4 CL� U n •° ° b b U U c •° ° d o In -C, o b o U U H lu w ° ca v °� 0. Ii U � Cq d' p., R. W U U a v o z O o � Uy u z O o Ivy Uy Z O o L) V Z O I 0.. yv o a U U b U o U U a U F Q F do .o U z Ca w <C d s e o o U d Z o 1 4F= x 3 o p o wZ oo n v c V) y c en 00 N -- p N oc O N cC N a > > a°oZ aZ z 70.c Q R v CJ ° z w vw N o � w U a tfj c O q O a o O a O c 0. v onz v aozcn W a o a P, O •o � o ? o U N N CCi 5n W x W W x H U > H O U ° c 1 O ssyy N O O a q U Q ``7 Ca 7 c Ca N u W O Q U hz a U cc) Qz H a wr� O � � a H a a � O � � a H OOo a v P� °-' � oa � W � ¢ F• �' a � 7 xCaH v C7 � CaH n H v C7 w w w w' C/1 Z h v c4 o 0 W a F 2 O 0 o x o .sz wo° o x ao.sz w ° x aL) - .. 3 0 0 o b z U U ¢ U U J� U ^�U� % o � � � o � Oa 0.i U o n nU � oa o o o nMUd opv O o o ° muu na ti o y i W ° n 0 ti v o o '� wdw ¢ Hx 0 0 V) 4 N 4 N N 00 N -- 0 N p� O N cC N > > o c o Q N oc o q � W Ca Q W M W Won U � � a o q C7 � ga � U q Yqa •� q � q ,,yam W 0.1 O -2r .4 .� d cd ,� 3.c) d Pti cl, h a Q Z 5nF W v q tr, ° O �l o0U ° ° 0 ° W W F a W a c.• � >, G' i, Q I-II x W x tfj 6 W x x u 44H ° W H W v H H O 0 c D aoc o o o cu II � t _ �W Q N Q g Qtoq C7 o C7 to °° a .' Q a P" -� q a a rj au Q 0., �. to U O q O z wcu a onun a U ° P. H W W U o a 0.1 u a4 o � � .. b w W .• w W � �" o � � � cW7Q F a `W7q E" a CJ Wl O ° � Jaz a U a � dz V x ydz W U qO � � P H wa qO � � a H a aqp � a a d U a v wa � Qo w z za � go o `� Wo > Qo W o 3Cn c4 P., 00.� z � � p O cG a00 .2z N O O.o � 3 0 U a i z a .`w..i P. `�' a+ O T ca v ° 0.i w ^.�� ° ° aUi W Ci, cis w o 4i,4 � q w o a M q w o f a,, Arno ° d � ouc oO � v71 '� F- -I U z Q a w ¢ H xW U z Q x x x ° o w w w cl N N ,• 7 cf] 00 N -- p N O O --� N N N bq C3 O O Z Ca w "'i �p 1p SR O O z z II '� w cC ww wYw O.2 W a a p b pC4U o 3a 3 o3v adi > d o 44 p o H p aIIi O N a a .�' bOA 3 w .. r- z 4 s w p w U `� a a a z z o a W c �4 W O E4 $ p W H Q b WVl w w W w W z ) o nz w " z d x ahz a v �I C7 QO � � a H a QO � � a " cGO � � a H a w w W W QF 7 d w � xCaF" n C7 w v� � SCaF" C7 d Cn L) U W W F O d H N W w F O d 7W c4 W E" O d H 0 a 0 0.� z w p zz O O .� z w p 0 OUc � a y yCD z _ OU ; a C7 ¢ _ pU = � � a y C7 z o o ° aUi 2 a o a z o v a ? w o o o a CA pU� H C/1 d w aU ° U. � o o d w ° U a o o d w 4U o a o d o a O o s� o^ G O w o � � a ° x x L) -a 0 o Z o w a ° O N 6C U N N > U - N > U d V� 00 N -- p N --� N N N C3 c� A- > U 44 ¢ x x w 0 O M zUa O cC M o a w h a> w x O a, o o o U -4 o o U U 5n W v U U U W U U zn �? ,ppW�� 5u rn 5q N ;� ,� •iw o U �- 2 d C4 O G Ul U] un ti °��' q F r Q n � �a O ❑ a O �� z � � •� z � H I w w ° o ° o z O o `'`� O � W O O O rW� U O O W U O O U ✓ O U C4 N o N a ao d M 2 M Q a ¢ a a s. .. 'aJ ,� �+ y L', s. •• 'ai p '� a 3 .� 3 .> w a a N CL w wa wto O ' j cd W a j a H oo � w Q x a C7x F Q 3 10 wx az 3 w xa � z3 a w a QO � � a a s H a Qoo � a a x z H � wQ � zCL4 (D ¢ H � qH Q z d Wawo o H H Wazo o ff o aoa sz N z o w o o x ao � .sz z o o a O U a Z a Z O U t7 :a ai a v a Z G U v U o o o o yv o z Q a � oH ¢ Ha U z q a z Q a ¢ Ha z Q a o z Q a ° 44 ° Tn W V) o 7� N ltz U 7 > U VI 00 N -- p N N � --� N N � N bq C3 N � U ° oz Q d H x M 70. ° U c4 p a w a W M a> cj v o Z Z o U U U o wV, O wx x o M v O a a Fr47 Q � a v a7Dx o b th unw W •• d q 3q � o x d q d tinT a a �- � Oz o z w ~ � U O a v '° Q C5 H x v H x H U v a o° z j 3 W z r� p� a a a Q a 4n Q+ w H � H � d a z C-4 H � wgw p z o d a` wQO Q Z F O F c4a Q C7 Z w Cn wa wa , w d O x y P O a o N W p 0 o Z d 0 c4 w O p . w W CJ 2 U n ° U ° g d U ° .o o U o o ti� v F O y i a dpHdHx71 a U z Q a d z Q w d � o3dHxa oa z Q w d z Q a dH w rwn w �n w ..�. O 'r- •�-� y N O H N y N p 7 60 00 N -- p N M O --� N N N bq C3 N a � "o •o Q v� w E 44 w ww x 2 Wz F F o F F o O a O w o O W W W W w W H t O N y c o � ro o II a ybp u a U -0z 7D -a ,� a ti o v' a c � O '° q a q a p q a � � c . aun cdn a wi ui o v o ff v o aIV H z z ahzZ a Z U U a � z �I va nWxQ� i C7 c vF C7 x W � aqd Q a F v a WOviw � d a qw w z F w z v c4 a O w a F w F c4a � oo.sa 3 0 0 3 p x o sz 3 0 0 3 p o x poo � p obi y p z y oU o y -L4 z z oU o U U n ° g n o o U U P o o U U d' w a d' 14. 14. v O, m o o � � � °� a. U � °J a U a> o L� � ca ti ❑ '" � �, � '� � Sy, � y v a, <e ¢ F � xa p z Q a z Q a o � � H � a U z w 0 w z n � v y oor+ ami o00 QQ 00 N -- p N � O --� N N N bq C3 44 44 w w Q o o ° rz Nz � CCS H C4+ M H N M H Fri M O 6 H ✓ N w - 'y Sn iL aU cu v � � 5n a o o z o O o 3 b o o a � o YQ 3 " 0 VO w "� °: `A I-II WQ a QF a Wp a Ri aC4 > c W x n 44 j x W x d W x O o adi a O b W o W Q S by �- °' 3 Y U Y 1 T N O N N '� O a i°• > O Pte- G� a r-L y Q a ° x 7b cc W O o W O b W W O •o Q ti W z W z �2 W a � W a O � cc0.W1 � V yx � 2 U a d x GHz a a H rnl CL4 H " r� O � � a H m Hc7 d a �^ wxQH v� 7 d CL, cn C7 d F" �^ WC r:) O' W W W pz 3 0 oo .� pz 3 0 oo .� °z 3 0 z aoo.y °z N w �4 lzp U o b rn, C7 O U o:.d ai L4 U .o o ti :A C) .2 U U E" ,o o a b o U C) F C/1 4 w � U z p b ❑ y w ° z O ro _ ° p o ° a d o ° °� ❑ a o4,�CZ w o a z Q a d � w ¢ H c� � 84 z Q C-) z Q s 0 0 o z ❑ - o �j0 TN T N N O p N O p � O /�• � � 00 N -- p N Vl O --� N N N bq C3 0 0 o Q 0 M H Ri M HW M H W CD z 0 z x z x u z ¢ o _ R O z ° z .y Y o T o z o 2WQRa1 .y o 2WQo �- � a .° d a v o a0. a v o a0. H o a � y � � U z zz z E- r� 0 0 U 0 ° O U ° 0 0 � H yH W � H a W � H a W70,' P0, o44 o HI ba° q � 46 ° > ° N °' vHi U ami a U a i [� U ami a H� as W raa� W W p q ¢ p c q p q qO >� o H a QOx � a H a C' v W cod n a �" v Wad H w > v Wad H xqH d H r:) C7 d Hix H Z c4a � w a' a � W Z w � a �, qp W z d Cn p c4 a00 .� Z W p x ao0.2z p 0 r4 aop.2Z 3 p 0 c b U U ¢ .o o -o a ti U U .° o n a D = V U a 0 0 = v v 0 o ti v C/1 7J s. ') C) vz O ° 0 � � a3 � o o a E4: a o o a s y � o pz 'wC o Hr o ao ¢U a O o0 0 o d Qa p'wG o Hr o ao Ua a va o v o da o N V) N �jH N TN 4 O N U d U > U N ti 00 N -- p N �p O -- N � w y ' o � E w U 0 v � Z wM 44 U U W W a o Q O a a W 0.1 q CIO 'A W � ° a LL1 W ° z LL� ;• 3w q � o u U o •.� oo. C7.° UD ° q U 44 J �I N N Yom. W ti > W pp > a > p > n a N a �- �1 tfj cG cG w w u bb cn a d w � o H � Zoa z z �� C7 � W oa x � •a '�, W `n oC7 Q. z zw H v ° Q OF, a O 3 H O 3 h � a gOOoa F, � °��'° z z O W O Wl d F" C7 W C7 d �„ C/1 U a W O H z H U W .a W O 4 W W c� caOo x .� Z W p N p 0 a a oa c a a o o d U ° U P •° ° U a •° ° o o f U ° U ¢, E� o ° o ° Oa R v w Pte, w ° o a v ° Ra O— a 1+1 Clz 0 a ro Z O ro � U �"o p Z O O ❑ o ° ° � U 0 W Q s o 0 zoz ¢ Hc� a z Q ¢ z q w z Q w ¢ o z Q azz ¢ n N 00 N -- p N � O --� N N N bq C3 a o o o Q z z q Q W 70. z o QD z o a z H o d W -o O N o O N Z O ^� Q W � o '� W � .� � W O � .� > •• o zz Zz O Q a U 7 Q .w U C0�7 a U Uta Z C, a o a m a ti-1 m V1 H 1 p 3 U a p 3 U Z aAH W rLaZEgZUF °J Ca F o a O F a O F a W p a cc cC Qy � d Q a a un tb a U a cC cd q o q O o q O W W N W W d W W o W Q W v W y W731W Q0.Wl C7 q E a C7 Q C7 Q OxE as U) aaQOc4E" a �� aQO4 � a a I � QO "4 � a P� v' a � w -W � .' p O w a H y waw O z H F-, v1 O p p z �a 3 p O w a O .? Z N W p 0 c4 a 0 0 .� Z U Cc, d U U o .� b b U U Q •° ° b y o U d [ct G `� cu a" c�i o d [� •�U o., `i ,` .) y � c�i o d [� '� c�i U w ° Z ❑ oU L. ° Z o oU Z ° dU ° p � �o � o '� � � vio � p � ri� o � o '� � � `!� F" oc � 0 yzi o a ° o " s• `� ❑ N ° O � � ° � n m o o ¢ ZQ a d w xa U �' hdH �' rxW U � pHdH�' xa U �' owdH� xa ° ° w N O N N O E- N aJ O M •� 00 N -- p N Oc O --� N N N N C3 w U 0 o x � �. W Mry Z O a w 0 M W M c?U � bA W bjDo a a Qo toc/) � a .4 o v .D U o x O e q o O O oOU on w u 0.� .W-1 E -w-1 4 W HZ 44 44 x Q Q ai N x ai o o on oo v, 5n o O � "" � � � to ° a a bo T �cn - cn - 0 ° v� ' a Q a a U Q � Q U Q I z z o w o un' b4a � to v ¢' oc � FW H 14 O h � h w u a o rel q0 � � a H a a E. a n w d a F c4 W x H v a d v� C7 d 1 w F" �7 c4 z 1 x Ca H v� C7 d Cn w H Wawo H O waF-' o H p 0 r� a0a .� z w p 0 z ¢ aOp .oZ N p 0 c4 o � ° 7 z a a ,o o b U U Q •° ° U a .° g b U a= U U n •° g ti „ zv o d' [i, a v � � v o d' w v o d' w � � •v Cti � p a ro oxvU � '� w � Z O o ro z 0 0 -° ❑ v' ,nO �ow � � O � -° oxo O z Q aoH ¢ Hc� � z g a ¢ z Q a a ¢ Fza z n ao � 0 v W � v, N N O H N N O rq U M U N M U 7 00 N -- p N p� O --� N N N C3 N a w ° o Q 44 O Q w M O C) W M w 1 H �- 2 w T a a w0 a d 44 Q x x z x LnCIA a a II o b q a U U a a4 a4 q w a p P, 1,4 Q- � � z„ aP4Oa v � d H c4 cn a �" v Wad 5c Z pv wed E v F"a' :� wgH c4 z d F,a' .axgF'' C7 W aaxq � vi C7 d a2O d H v aF 0O w d C) p.2z 0Z U o d ai v k z U o d a i C7 z n O U p o ai C7 v U �Y1 U n 8 �Y�Y1 m a N w c�C ° 't Z 'c6 0.i v O Ci, -joU � w ° Z O C7 ro w o w o a d o v o o a d o v O N rn ¢ Ha z a a z q a - ¢ Hc� a z a aoH ¢ Ha u z Q a vi N y O N N O H 00 U 7 > 00 N -- p N O O N N N N bq C3 N a > > 0 en ° z x Qoc 70. C4M Q M Q a W h ° > W O N O 71 ° W U ° Pyy- UU-i L to a tin Z on Q a x O d d W d d W tfj q F ro x � .� � 0 c� ° o ° h ¢ q Ntt to a > Q o � cA C) ° y N a a 3 a a a W a a a v v U W a O U U d wl d a d a U � ° � cL� a p � w d � � q a O a q cC a00.� Z N W p z �G a00 .� � W O T c� '��J ^J a+ O >, .�-i R o O z o >, cC sR. O O R U U 'O V O d W Pr U U R .a U o d W ¢ U U .� V o w ° ° � A'' d � o o � � cn � w ° '� a d w o o � � '� o � w ° = a d w V b o o o o d z (� a l �� C° o o d z Q w z (� wdHxa U � � dHcG U � zjHdH � w a U O w w w w ctl .c/I v v� r- N y � �.'N >'y C N p t\ y O N N O � U l� > U 1� U 00 00 N -- p N N N N N C3 N c� a o Q r Z C7 o H � w U o � o � O .o Q � cG IF-4y c4 cx7 � w O it y a N U a U U U N a o a" �c c� 4 z a w 9 3 C4 U x° p �� Q W q O O W .l H P4O z z a td xD c4 z 7 d Cn x aO � 24 Z c w Z O W O U � a b y y w a y z a o o d o o ° 0 b o • ❑ F U C/1 w � U3 � a ° o w ° a U o w � xNU � = r° z O b c C a w � N M 14696_,map A, low Gov M ll r r &W Pond f 4a/",D,A i u �U , 0 1 n,< g e j y ao, out— v� d" iii0//' i �m N JI Is l ari Hol Legend .4...- MAN \ \ \ w a / \ \ \6 � - � + - Lm 0 0 } / - ) j of I - � � � k « LLI \ Qw /\ j � ) _ \ \ K ( _ _ LL \ \ < _ w \ - � � 0 - _ <L) \ � § � 2 \ \ \ \ \ \ - o- « _ C - - - w _0 UW / § 7 k \ $ g £ u 0E � F-- uw u � \ \ \ o \ \ za z ! < 2E 2 ƒ w > (n CO 2 M V V M V I- 0 M M M V N M N (9 M V (O Lq Lq u7 V M M V Cl! N N Lu O U 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ X Q U LL Q K Q 2> O a M N M N M M O M N N M U W 2 7 N M M M M ((l (O M Z w U 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ 06 W Z J W Z LL Q } (O N O � M M V M m ti J U ¢ Q H Lu CO cc M I- M M M MV N N M (O M M M (� 7 M N N N th O J O U O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 ZO X Q HLL W Q O M UN M M I� m M M M M In M M M M N N M N N N N Cl) M V M V V (n (n V Q W U 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lu Z Q J Q � d > JU N N N N M N M N M M M J U ¢ Q Q u) J Q u) u) 0 J (n (17 (n W (n U) W J (n (n (7 W fn co (n W W W U W W W Z W W Z U W W W Z W W W W Z Z Z Z Q Z Z Q Z Z Z Z Q Z Z Z Z Q O O ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ p ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ H VN M V Q N V Q V Z Z 0 Z UU LL 0 LL W O N Q 0 0 Q U 7 0 W 0 Lu w Z a w Z > W = 0 0 LU w a w LL J_ U Q LL LU w m M LO UD r M V I� M I- r O O U LL] u] W W V V M N M (D (D V V 0 M N M N M N U O O O O O O O O O O O 6 0 6 6 Z cl U O 0 0 6 0 0 (n X Q O X Q Z LL U LL Z W Q W 0 U Qoe Q U O > co N N N N (D O > CO 00 D] W Q V 7 M M 7 ((l M M M V V r r N r H M r r r N r LU� W U 6 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 6 6 Z W U O 6 6 6 0 Q Q U qy Z W 7) Z .6 LU LLJ W } > M r Z LL > N N V 7 N Z 7 7 O O lD r D) N r (D J ~ U N N r N M N N N r r r ~ U N r r r r Q Q Q Q Q W 2i W CO > V MM O ((7 N LL) (D n (fl I� (D m > r- O O Q] ao N > O 7 W M M J U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J U O 0 0 0 0 0 OXQ OXQ U) LL U LL W Q W Q O > (o LO m m N m m (o P- w (o M (D 9 O > (D (D w U K M M N N co co N N N co Cl) r r N r U d' 2 (v r r r N r Q W U o 0 06 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 a w U o 6 6 6 � o Z Q Z Q J J Q W > Q W Y ro rnco vro NMCl) o O r° vr N m o o o rn N N r N N N Q (n U) Q (n (n J Q (n U) Q (n U) N J (n W (n W J (n W (n U) W J J (n W (n CO U) W J W (n UO (n U) W V U W Z W Z U W Z W W Z 7 V W Z W W W Z U Z W W W W Z U Z Q Z Q Z Z Q Z Z Q v Z Z Q Z Z Z Q Z Q Z Z Z Z Q p Q J Q J p Q J Q Q J p Q J Q Q Q J p J Q Q Q Q J Q J J J J J J J J J (n J J J J J J J J J J J J LLU N J J ry J O J y F N J lD co J J LD O J p U Q Q V Q Q w U Q Q V Q Q J Z 2 V Z Z 0 LL a LL 0 o a LL Cl LL o WWLLI W W W Z J G O a G a G a G 0 O p w > _> J > > p w p J Z > > Z o O LL' Z > > Z > Q D D D F D D D Z a v LU w w a g 0 0 0 00 0 0 � � U o 0 0 0 0 Q W Q Z0 0 0 W U 0 0 0 O p = U o 0 0 0 0 Q F z W _ O O N O O O O O (� J O o , U o 0 0 0 0 Q W a r W w Z = J O cC M i(J 0 0 0 O p U Z U O6 O 0 0 0 Q W N W °O F- C7 w Z LU z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in >0 ¢ U O o 0 0 0 0 [0 Q UJ � E m a p Q 0LU C) 0 0 o o °' o W U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 2 O 2 > UJ W N LL [IfM (O M N F J = O O O O O O p a H U O O O O O O � Q N 3 w C R 7 > y a W O O O O 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 W O V O O O 0 0 0 O O H Q z 0 F- u w W a J W P N �IL In M N OO O z Q } U O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 U O ~ U aW In z a 09 Vw w U) rn z0 Q z ¢ O Q z ¢ 3¢ Q Q Q Q r ~ J J Q U J J Q � - 4'S US U J J J w J J J ~ N z N Z y � Q W W a Q K O w OU w LU U cD QW J (7 w Q V Z U) Ow S2 U ca (n OU Q W a 2 W W zW 0 00 a :5> O (9 z w z a a VW LL W z J J z LL a �n v O O } LL F J z O p U W N W H z w W W w a g ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , n Co U o 0 Q ❑ W o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 2 ZO U o Q ZLUN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 Q W W Z U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � Q Q O W w Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Q LU W ❑ N u� co (O V N N co m �n r N m Z0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O W U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL of W M N N N M W J U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q LU > w ❑ � to N N M N N V M V N M M W Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 U0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Q w W J W N V V OJ N (D IA N D N 6) c0 to n M r OJ V N J d In N U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 Q ~ Q (0 N N W W O W W Q Q Q V) Z J A A W U) U) R7 WS O Z y .6 W (n W W In W W Z u� N In W g Z Z W Z Z W Z Q Z Z Z w a J 0 Z W J g g g J g g g V v d' 7 g J A J W Z 7 Q 0 N M N A LU v w o z � w Lu W Z LL J Z (.7 Z F LU Z I~i W N Z ¢ O U' U W OU (.7 (D W C7 J p N w (.7 z Q p w Z ¢ J J W O J W V ? N to U A V g ° J W Q w z 0 O a6 M Q a p W ¢ ¢ Z w ¢ ¢ ¢ IL O LL U' ULu t7U` (7 U' 0 0 U' U' 0 O W j J O N J U O O N U Z Z ILLI a W M v O O F Z z a o m L U W W H Z APPENDIX D PUBLIC RESOURCES 1. NYS Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Letter 2. NYS Cultural Resources Information System Map L.K. McLean Associates, P.C. NEW YORK �� U F Parks, Recreation,, and Historic Preservation ANDREW M. CUOMO ROSE HARVEY Governor Commissioner November 17. 2U17 Mr. Pau| K4arfione Project Director Conifer Realty, LLC 1000 University Ave Ste 500 Rochester, N`/ 14007 Re: HCR Vineyard View Residential Development 626U0County Rd48. Greenport, yJ`f11D44 17PR07845 Dear Mr. Marfiona: Thank you for requesting the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). We have reviewed the project in accordance with Section 100 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1988. These comments are those of the GHPO and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review ofthe project pureuant tothe National Environmental Policy Act and/or the State Environmental Quality Review Act (New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8). Based upon this review, the New York SHPO has determined that no historic properties will be affected bvthis undertaking. If further correspondence is required regarding this project, please be auna to refer to the (]PR|HPProject Reviovv (PR) numbernotedobove. Sincerely, � Michael F. Lynch, P.E, A|A Director, Division for Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation P.O.Box 18G.Waterford, New York 12188-018S~(518)237-8643~www.nyoparko.com �m m r wY 4J i v i ff/��dG rnovnwo�iiu�l a 0666 i xIN ,m rn u c t4 rnO yy, 02 v v o u } O c u ava 1