Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-11/16/1988 SPECAPPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD-STATE ROAD ~5 SOUTHDLD, L.I., N.Y. 11g71 TELEPHONE (5'16) 765-1809 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 A Regular Meeting was held by the Southold Town Board of Appeals on WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman; Serge J. Doyen, Joseph H. Sawicki, and James Dinizio, Jr., consisting of four of the five Board Members. Absent was: Member Charles Grigonis {out-of-state}). Also present were: Linda Kowalski, Assistant and Secretary of the Board. The Chairman opened the meeting at 7:30 o'clock p.m. CONCLUSION OF HEARING: Appeal No. 3708. Matter of DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES. (At the 10/26/88 Hearing, a resolution was adopted concluding the public submissions portion of the hearing, but leaving the hearing in open recess only to allow further questionning, if determined necessary by the Board Members who were not able to attend the October 26, 1988 hearing. Members Sawicki and Doyen confirmed their review of the transcript of the hearing, file material, viewing of the premises, and familiarity with the record in question, indicated they did not feel a furtherance of the hearing for questionning was necessary since they did not have any further questions. Chairman Goehringer and Member Dinizio concurred, and the following resolution was adopted: RESOLVED, to conclude (close) the hearing in its entirety Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- November 16; 1988 Special Meeting concerning Appeal No. 3708 - DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Charles Grigonis {out-of-state}). This resolution was duly adopted. Chairman Goehringer left during deliberations in the Matter of Appeal No. 3708 - DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES. The Board started deliberations and rendered the following: Appeal No. 3708: Upon application of DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of parcel as exists with insufficient lot area and width and more particularly described in Deed at Liber 8721 page 433 dated October 25, 1979, having been set-off without Planning Board approval. Location of Property: 1300 Marratooka Lane, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 115, Block 3, Lot 18.3 (previously part of 18.2). WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 26, 1988,in the Matter of the Application of DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES under Appeal No. 3708; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the Residential and Agricultural Zoning District and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 115, Block 3, Lot 18.3 (previously part of 18.2). 2. The subject premises as exists is vacant, contains a total lot area of 24,752 square feet, and has frontage along Marratooka Lake of 58+- feet and Marratooka Lane of 89.50 feet, as more particularly shown on the Map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. June 14, 1988 and Survey Map Prepared October 3, 1979, amended June 1, 1987. Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3708 - WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES 3. By this application, appellant requests Variances from the Zoning Code for approval of an insufficient lot area of 24,752 sq. ft. and insufficient width (frontage) of 89.50 feet, as exists and described by Deed dated October 15, 1979 between the current owner and the prior owner, Robert E. Rehm. 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot area of 80,000 sq. ft. (eff. 5/83) and lot width (or street frontage) of 175 feet. 5. Article III, Section 100-31 also excepted those lots having a lot area of less than 80,000 sq. ft. that were "held in single and separate ownership prior to November 1971, and thereafter," or were approved by the Planning Board prior to May 20, 1983. The record shows that this parcel was not held in single and separate ownership prior to November 1971 and that no town approvals have been found concerning the set-off of the subject premises from the adjoining northerly house lot (now of Lowell) or the adjoining southerly vacant lot (now of Cuddy). 6. In viewing the immediate area within Section 115, Block 3, District 1000 of the Suffolk County Tax Maps,the following lot sizes and parcel numbers are identified for the record: (a) Lot 15 at 1.2+- acres; (b) Lot No. 16 at 1.0+- acre in area; (c) Lot 17 at .95+- of an acre; (d) subsequent to the subject set-off of 18.3, previously referred to as 18.2, now Lot 18.1 at 1.2+- acres; (e) prior to the subject set-off of 18.3, when combined with 18.2, Lot 18 (or 18.1) at 2.1+- acres; (f) Lot 19 at 1.3+- acres; (g) Lot 29 at 21,500+- sq. ft. Each of these parcels are located along the west side of Marratooka Road or front along the immediate shoreline of Marratooka Lake. (Other parcels which may also front along Marratooka Lake were not included since these parcels do not have direct access or frontage along Marratooka Road and do front along other Town Roads.) 7. Upon inspection and viewing of the character of the immediate area (noted above), the size of this proposed lot is substantially smaller, and a majority of the remaining building lots are substantially larger. 8. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that it is the burden of the landowner to prove that the area restrictions as applied to his land imposes "significant economic injury"; and the burden of proof has not been substantiated; {Matter of Cowan v. Kern, 41 N.Y. 2d 591 (1977); Matter of Fulling v. Palumbo, 21 N.Y. 2d 30}; Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3708 - WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES (b that the relief requested is substantial in relation to the requirements, being a variance of approximately 70%, and meeting only 30% of the 80,000 sq. ft. minimum requirement; (c) that the circumstances are not unique and are not principally related to the property; (d) that the difficulties claimed are self-imposed, particularly due to the inaction of the property owner over many years to apply for and obtain town approvals for the improper set-offs; (e) there will be an adverse effect of increased dwelling density thus produced on available governmental facilities by the creation of precedents if the variance were allowed, and will in effect establish a zone district at odds with all other zone districts provided for in the Zoning Code ~VanDusen v. Jackson 35 A.D. 2d 58); (f) there will be a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood and detrimental effect to neighboring properties; (g) in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in consideration of all the above factors, the interest of justice will be served by denying the variance. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizi0 Mr. Sawicki , it was , seconded by RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3708 in the Matter of the Application of DAVID WALKER/TURTLE ASSOCIATES, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Sawicki, Doyen and Dinizio. Absent from all deliberations and vote were: Member Grigonis (out-of-state) and Chairman Goehringer. This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -5a- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting At this point in time, Chairman Goehringer meeting room for deliberations, and deliberate with the following matters: Appl. No. 3760 - ELSIE D. YOUNG; Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. Appl. No. returned to the the Board proceeded to 3761 - ELSIE D. YOUNG; 3751 - JEAN C. HOLLAND/LONGNECKER; 3773 - GRETCHEN K. HEIGL; 3784 ~ JAMES YOUNG; 3772 - JOHN G. PHILIPPIDES; 3777 - CARL J. and RUTH V. NELSON 3762 - ROBERT Go 3783 - JOSEPH A. 3782 - JOSEPH A. and DIANNA BAKER STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC. STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC.: Southold Town Board of Appeals-Sb-~ovember 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3761: Application of ELSIE D. YOUNG for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30(15)(M) to allow conversion of dwelling for Accessory Apartment with Certificate of Occupancy dated after January 1, 1984, although Affidavit of Building Inspector indicates dwelling met the requirements of a Certificate of Occupancy had application been made in a timely fashion. Location of Property: 480 Grissom Lane, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-78-1-10.3. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on Octo- ber 6, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of ELSIE D. YOUNG under Application No. 3761; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant requests a Variance from Article III, Section 100-30, Subsection B{15}(M) of the Zoning Ordinance, which provision states as follows: ...The building which is converted to permit an acces- sory apartment shall be in existence and have a valid certificate of occupancy issued prior to January 1, 1984 .... Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting 2. Under Application for a Special Exception filed and considered under same dates herewith, (File No. 3760), applicant proposes to establish a new "Accessory Apartment" within the existing principal (dwelling with garage) structure, as more particularly shown on the sketched plans submitted with the application prepared by William Young. 3. The premises in question is located in the "A-40" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District, containing a total area of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. and road frontage of 135+- feet along Grissom Lane. 4. The subject premises is improved with a single-family dwelling structure with attached garage as more particularly shown on the survey prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, PoC., revised April 8, 1985. 5. The area to be occupied as an "Accessory Apartment" is at the northerly end of the existing structure and will contain a living area of approximately 528 square feet (within an area 24'6" x 22') as shown on the sketch floor plan submitted with this application. The remaining floor area will continue to be used as the principal single-family residence of the owner. 6. Article III, Section 100-30(B) permits the establishment of such use, subject to conditions (a) thereof. through (p) 7. Subsection "m" thereof provides that "...the building which is converted to permit an accessory apartment shall be in existence and have a valid Certificate of Occupancy issued prior to January 1, 1984." Although a Certificate of Occupancy was not validated until after January 1, 1984, it is hereby determined that the documentation submitted is sufficient and the applicant has complied with this specific requirement, entitling her to same (see Affidavits, etc.). 8. It is the position of this Board that this variance application must be dismissed since the Board is without jurisdiction to vary the conditions of a Special Exception; (Knadle v. ZBA of Huntington, 121 A.D. 2d 447 (1986); Roginski v. Rose, et al., 63 N.Y. 2d 735 (1984). 9. A parking plan has been submitted in behalf of the applicant depicting the area immediately east along the front section of the dwelling. The Bulk and Parking Schedule of the Code requires two spaces for the one-family principal use, and the Accessory Apartment will be required to have two parking spaces, for a total of four. (Each available garage space would be permitted as one parking space, when appropriate.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (YOUNG decision, continued:) Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested in the Variance Application for ELSIE D. YOUNG under Appl. No. 3761, BE AND HEREBY IS DISMISSED for the reasons stated in paragraph 8, supra. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis (out of state). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Application of ELSIE D. YOUNG for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance for permission to establish Accessory Apartment in an existing dwelling structure in accordance with the requirements of Article III, Section 100-30B, subsection 15. Location of Property: 480 Grissom Lane, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-78-1-10.3. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on Octo- ber 6, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of ELSIE D. YOUNG under Application No. 3760; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant requests a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30, Subsection B(15} for permission to establish a new "Accessory Apartment" within the existing principal (dwelling with garage) structure, as more particularly shown on the sketched plans submitted with the application prepared by William Young. 2. The premises in question is located in the "A-40" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District, containing a total area of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. and road frontage of 135+- feet along Grissom Lane. 3. The subject premises is improved with a single-family dwelling structure with attached garage as more particularly shown on the survey prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., revised April 8, 1985. Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- November ~6~ 1988 Special Meeting 4. The area to be occupied as an "Accessory Apartment" is at the northerly end of the existing structure and will contain a living area of approximately 528 square feet (within an area 24'6" x 22') as shown on the sketch floor plan submitted with this application. The remaining floor area will continue to be used as the principal single-family residence of the owner. 5. Article III, Section 100-30(B) permits the establishment of such use, subject to conditions (a) thereof. through (p) 6. Subsection "m" thereof provides that "...the building which is converted to permit an accessory apartment shall be in existence and have a valid Certificate of Occupancy issued prior to January 1, 1984." Although a Certificate of Occupancy was not validated until after January 1, 1984, it is hereby determined that the documentation submitted is sufficient and the applicant has complied with this specific requirement, entitling her to same. 7. It is noted for the record that under Appeal No. 3761, a Variance has also been filed and processed simultaneously herewith requesting relief from Condition "m" under Article III, Section 100-3)(B){15}. (The subject variance was dismissed since the Board is without jurisdiction to vary the conditions of a Special Exception--see paragraph #6, supra, alternatively; Knadle v. ZBA of Huntington, 121 A.D. 2d 447 (1986); Roginski v. Rose, et al., 63 N.Y. 2d 735 (1984). 8. A parking plan has been submitted in behalf of the applicant depicting the area immediately east along the front section of the dwelling. The Bulk and Parking Schedule of the Code requires two spaces for the one-family principal use, and the Accessory Apartment will be required to have two parking spaces, for a total of four. (Each available garage space would be permitted as one parking space, when appropriate.) In considering this application, the Board finds and determines that: (a) the use requested will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) the use will not adversely affect the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The Board has also considered subsections {a} through {1} of Article XII, Section 100-121(C){2} of the Zoning Code. Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- November !6, 1988 Special Meeting Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for an "Accessory Apartment" as provided in Article III, Section 100-30(B){15} of the Zoning Code, in the Matter of ELSIE D. YOUNG under Appl. No. 3760, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS (a) through (p) of the Zoning Code, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis (out of state). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -Il-November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3751 - HOLLAND/LONGNECKER, continued:) ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Application of JEAN C. HOLLAND-LONGNECKER for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of proposed Parcels A and B having insufficient area and width. Location of Property: Sunset Road, Beach Lane, and Lowland Road, at Nassau Point Map Section C, Lots 327 and 328, and Walter Grabie Map, Lots 36 and 37; Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-111-10-18, 1, and 2. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 18, 1988, and on October 6, 1988, all submissions were officially accepted and the file officially concluded; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The properties in question are located along Beach Lane, Meadow Lane, Lowland Road and Sunset Road, at Nassau Point, Hamlet of Cutchoque, Town of Southold, County of suffolk, and are identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 111, Block 10, Lot #1 and Lot #18. 2. The properties in question are further identified as follows: (a) Lot #327 and #328 on the "Amended Map A of Nassau Point, filed August 16, 1922 as Suffolk County Map No. 156; and (b) Lots No. 36 and 37 on the "Map of Property of Walter C. Grabie filed April 19, 1938 as Suffolk County Map No. 1257. Both subdivision maps are listed under Section 100-12 of the Zoning Code "Exceptions" as to lot area and width requirements as enacted by the Southold Town Board by Local Law Amendments October 30, 1973. Southold Town Board of Appeals -12-November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3751 - HOLLAND/LONGNECKER, continued:) 3. By this application, appellant requests Variances from the Zoning Code, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of the insufficient area and width of two parcels in this proposed re-division of land and the insufficient setback of the existing dwelling from the relocated division line (to the south), all as more particularly shown on the Survey Map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. dated June 29, 1987: (a) Parcel A with a total of 61,525+- square feet, inclusive of the improved dwelling parcel and section of land located opposite Lowland Road referred to as Lot 37 (both of 55,660 sq. ft. and 5865 sq. ft., respectively); (b) Parcel B with a total of 55,242+- square feet, inclusive of the vacant parcel and the section of land located opposite Lowland Road referred to as Lot #36 (both of 40,000 sq. ft. and 15,242 sq. ft., respectively; (c) insufficient setback of the existing dwelling to the proposed re-division line at four feet at its closest point. 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Code requires a minimum lot area of 80,000 square feet (eff. 5/83), lot width (or street frontage) of 175 feet, minimum sideyard at 20 feet, and minimum rearyard at 50 feet. 5. Article III, Section 100-12, as amended 10/30/73 by the Southold Town Board by Local Law No. 5-1973, excepted the Map of "Nassau Point" from the lot area and lot width requirements of the Zoning Code. 6. For the record, it is noted that the applicant acquired the subject premises July 17, 1967. Since that time, several building permits have been applied for and issued permitting substantial renovations and enlargement of the dwelling on these two lots, jointly. 7. Also noted for the record are: (a) Board of Appeals action rendered November 29, 1984 under Appeal No. 3230; (b) Board of Appeals action rendered June 19, 1985 under Appeal No. 3361; (c) N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Permit 910-84-0678; (d) Suffolk County Health Department approval dated April 6, 1988 pursuant to a Board of Review Determination made March 7, 1988, with reference to the subject premises. 8. A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been previously submitted in legal form, which restricts all structures, buildings or dwelling(s) of any kind, except docks, bulkheads, rip-rap and similar accessory structures as permitted by codes, upon Lots 36 and 37, Map of Walter C. Grabie, located along the west side of Lowland Road (opposite the upland parcel) which document is required to be filed and recorded in the Office of the County Clerk. Southold Town Board of Appeals-13- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3751 - HOLLAND/LONGNECKER, continued:) 9. The lots within District 1000, Section 111, Block 10, (in the immediate area of the subject premises) are shown by the current deeds to: (a) consist of two subdivision lots #329 and 330 within Lot #17, for a total area of 2.3+- acres; (b) consist of one subdivision lot #331 within Lot #16 for a total area of 1.1+- acres; (c) consist of one subdivision lot #332 within Lot #15 for a total area of 1.4+- acres; (d) consist of one subdivision lot for Lot #19, for a total area of 1.0+- acre; (e) consist of one subdivision lot for Lot ~20, for a total area of 1.0+- acre. The lot area resulting by the alteration of the lot line as submitted is not out of character with a majority of the lots within the immediate block. 10. In considering this appeal, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the restriction as applied to his land does impose sufficient practical difficulties if the variance is denied; (b) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the area requirements as excepted by the Town Board under Section 100-13 of the Zoning Code, although otherwise substantial in relation to the minimum lot-area requirement under Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Code; (c) that the circumstances are unique to the property and are not shared by other properties in the neighborhood; (d) there will not be an adverse effect of increased dwelling density thus produced on available governmental facilities; (e) there will not be a substantial change in the character of the area for the reasons noted previously; (f) that the difficulty cannot be obviated by some method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance, with the exception of relocating the existing dwelling building; (g) that there will not be a detriment to adjoining properties; (h) that in considering all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by the grant of the relief requested, as conditionally noted below; (i) that the record is not sufficient to substantiate as required in the standards set by the Courts a denial of this application {Matters of Cowan v. Kern 41 N.Y. 2d 591; Fulling v. Palumbo, 21 N.Y. 2d 30; etc.). Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as requested in the Matter of JEAN HOLLAND-LONGNECKER under Appeal No. 3751, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Southold Town Board of Appeals-14- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Decision, Appl. No. 3751 HOLLAND/LONGNECKER, continued:) 1. There be no further encroachment by building construction within 20 feet of the new division line on Lot B (to the south); 2. There be no further encroachment by building construction between existing dwelling and the southerly property line on Lot A (at any point); 3. Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be prepared by applicant's attorney in legal form, to be executed, notarized, and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk, with copies to be furnished for the Board of Appeals record, restricting the above-referred Lots #36 and #37 from any construction of buildings or structures (with the exception of bulkhead, ramps, rip-rap or similar structures). 4. The lot area for Parcel A include the area from the lowland section (Lot #37), as applied, for a total area of 61,525 sq. ft. {55,660 + 5865 sq. ft.}; 5. The lot area for Parcel B include the area from the lowland section (Lot #36), as applied, for a total area of 55,242 sq. ft. {40,000 + 15,242 sq. ft.}. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, and Sawicki. (Member Dinizio abstained due to the fact that his effective date of appointment as a Board Member was subsequent to the hearing and filing of the application.) (Member Grigonis was absent (out-of-state). This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- November ~6~ 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Application of GRETCHEN K. HEIGL for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to connect deck to porch, leaving an insufficient setback fro the south(westerly) property line. Location of Property: Private Right-of-Way located off the North Side of Soundview Avenue, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 68, Block 1, northerly part of Lot 14 (now 14.1). WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on Octo- ber' 26, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of GRETCHEN K. HEIGL, under Appeal No. 3773; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located at the northerly end of a private right-of-way, extending off the north side of Sound View Avenue, in the Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 68, Block 1, Lot 14.1. 2. The subject premises is improved with an one-story frame dwelling as shown on the survey map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl as surveyed July 3, 1986, and amended October 6, 1988. Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- November 16~ 1988 Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3773 - HEIGL, decision, continued:) 3. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, Column "A-80" of the Zoning Code requires minimum sideyard setbacks at 20 and 25 feet for a principal dwelling structure. 4. The relief requested by this application is specifically a variance from the required 20 feet to 12.2 feet for the attachment of an existing stoop area containing approximately 30 sq. ft., exclusive of the steps, to an existing sideyard deck, presently setback 17.0 feet from the south(westerly) property line at its closest points, all as more particularly shown on the survey amended October 6, 1988. 5. The dwelling together with the subject stoop area and sideyard deck was constructed pursuant to Building Permit No. 15665 dated February 5, 1987. 6. It is noted that the lot in question was the subject of a prior Board of Appeals action rendered May 28, 1986 under Appl. No. 3418, which conditioned compliance of the "A-80" Bulk Schedule" as to minimum setbacks, and specific right-of-way improvements. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the relief requested is minimal; (b) the relief will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (c) the difficulties are uniquely related to the property; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, requested and conditionally noted below. as Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals -17-November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Appeal No. 3773 - HEIGL, decision, continued:) RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested under Appeal No. 3773 in the Matter of GRETCHEN K. HEIGL for attachment of the stoop area to the existing open-deck area with an insufficient setback from the south(westerly) property line at 12.2 feet from the south(westerly) property line (and 10.3 feet to the actual step area), as shown on the Survey Map amended October 6, 1988, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: There be no further encroachment (expansion) other than as applied or existing that will violate the minimum setback provision for this (south) westerly yard area. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis {out of state}). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -18- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Application of JAMES YOUNG for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with insufficient frontyardsetbacks from the westerly and southerly property lines. Location of Property: NE/s Minnehaha Boulevard at "Laughing Waters," Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 87, Block 3, Lot 8. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on Octo- ber 26, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of JAMES YOUNG under Appeal No. 3784; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the easterly side of Minnehaha Boulevard and the northerly side of Owaissa Avenue, in the Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 87, Block 3, Lot 8. 2. The subject premises is improved with an one-story frame dwelling and accessory storage shed, all as shown on the survey map prepared by VanTuyl & Son as surveyed August 26, 1971. Southold Town Board of Appeals -19- November 16:1988 Special Meeting 3. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, Column "A" of the Zoning Code requires a minimum frontyard setback at 35 feet for a principal dwelling structure. 4. The relief requested by this application is specifically a variance from the required 35 feet to 27+- feet for the construction of a 16-ft. by 24 ft. addition at the southerly end of the dwelling structure. 5. The dwelling as exists is shown to be set back 33 feet from the westerly front property line along Minnehaha Boulevard and 18-1/2 feet from the front southerly property line (along Owaissa Avenue, a paper street), at its closest points. 6. It is noted that the lot in question is nonconforming as to lot area, width and lot depth, limiting the permitted building area. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the established nonconforming frontyard setback from the southerly property line; (b) the relief if granted as requested will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (c) the difficulties are uniquely related to the property and are not personal in nature; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, as requested and conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested under Appeal No. 3784in the Matter of JAMES YOUNG for a 16 ft. x 24 ft. proposed addition with an insufficient frontyard setback from the westerly property line at 27+- feet and from the southerly property line at 8+- feet feet, as shown on the sketched survey Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- November 16~ 1988 Special Meeting submitted for consideration, provided there be no further expansion of the dwelling other than as exists or applied for that will violate the minimum 35-ft. frontyard setback provision of the Zoning Code. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Member Grigonis was absent (out of state). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3772: Application of JOHN G. PHILIPPIDES for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to construct addition at rear of existing dwelling with an insufficient setback from existing bulkhead. Location of Property: South Side of Old Cove Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 52, Block 2, Lot 10.1. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 26, 1988, the Matter of the Application of JOHN G. PHILIPPIDES under Appeal No. 3772; and in WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the south side of a private road (known as Old Cove Road) which extends off the west side of Beverly Road, in the Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 52, Block 2, Lot 10.1. 2. The subject premises contains a total area of approximately 12,600 sq. ft., lot width of 122.64 feet, lot depth of 102+- feet, and is improved with a single-family, one-story frame dwelling, all as more particularly shown on the Survey dated May 6, 1968, guaranteed July 29, 1970. Southold Town Board of Appeals -22-November 16, 1988 Special Meeting 3. By this application, appellant requests a Variance from the Provisions of Article XI, Section 100-119.2B to construct open deck addition at the rear of existing dwelling with a setback at'18 feet from the outer edge of the existing bulkhead along Arshamomaque Pond (or Old Cove). 4. Article XI, Section 100-119.2B of the Zoning Code (as amended) requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip-rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. 5. The nonconformities of the property and building as exists are noted as follows: (a) the rearyard setback at approximately 25 feet from the ordinary highwater mark, which is seaward of the existing bulkhead; (b) the setback at 19'6" from the outer edge of existing bulkhead. These preexisting nonconformities lend to the practical difficulties and are uniquely related to the premises. 6. It is noted for the record that the property was the subject of a prior variance under appeal application No. 822, decision as rendered January 13, 1966. 7. It is the position of this Board that in considering this application: (a) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the existing nonconforming setback, being a variance of 1-1/2 feet {19'6" to 18'}; (b) the relief if granted will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (c) the difficulties are uniquely related to the property and are not personal in nature; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (e) in view of all of the above, the interests ofjustice will best be served by granting the relief requested, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals-23- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested under Appeal No. 3772 in the Matter of the Application of JOHN G. PHILIPPIDES for the construction of a 12' by 38' open deck, attached at the rear of existing dwelling structure, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That deck not encroach any further than 18 feet from the outer edge of the existing concrete bulkhead; 2. That the deck remain open, unroofed, and not be converted for additional living area {except by formal application}; 3. That all lighting, if any, be shielded to the property with mushroom-type cover(s). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis {out-of-state}. This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3777: Application of CARL J. and RUTH Vo NELSON for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-31 and 100-32, and Article XI, Section 100-119.1 for permission to construct tennis court with 6-ft. high fencing in the frontyard area and total lot coverage in excess of the maximum-permitted 20 percent. Location of Property: 1060 Moore's Lane, Greenport, NY; Eastern Shores Subdivision, Section 3, Lot 99; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 33, Block 2, Lot 43. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on October 26, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of CARL J. and RUTH V. NELSON under Appeal Application No. 3777; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding area(s); and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellants in this proposed tennis court project request Variances from the following provisions of the Zoning Ordinance: (a) Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, as to lot coverage in excess of the maximum-permitted requirement of 20 percent for all structures and buildings; (b) Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to locate same in an area other than the required rear yard; (c) Article XI, Section 100-119.1 as to the fence height in excess of the maximum-permitted requirement of four feet, all as more particularly shown on the survey dated August 13, 1988, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. Southold Town Board of Appeals -25-November 16, 1988 Special Meeting 2. The premises in question is located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zone District, contains a total area of 19,500 sq. ft., has frontage along the east side of Moore's Lane North of 150.0 feet and the south side of Inlet Pond Road of 130.0 feet. The regulations applying to this Zone District are regulated by Column "A" of the Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code. 3. The subject premises is improved with an one-story single-family dwelling and accessory swimingpool as depicted on the survey map of June 30, 1979 (amended August 13, 1988). The dwelling structure is set back 50 feet from each of the two front property lines along the roads, 20 feet from the easterly (side) property line, 41-1/2 feet from the southerly rear property line, and the accessory swimmingpool is located in the southerly (rear) yard area. 4. By this application, appellants proposes to construct a 50' by 110' tennis court with six-ft, high fencing along the northerly property line (along Inlet Pond Road) with zero setback from the easterly and northerly property lines, and 20 feet from the westerly front property line (along Moore's Lane North). 5. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code provides for a maximum of 20% lot coverage for all structures on a lot. The lot coverage furnished for the record by applicants is 9,335 sq. ft. total, or 48 percent in relation to the total lot area. 6. Article III, Section 100-32 of the Zoning Code provides that all accessory structures and uses be located in the rearyard area and shall occupy not more than 40% of the area thereof. The tennis court with fence is not proposed in the rearyard area, and for the record it is noted that the rear yard area is occupied (lot coverage) by 57 percent. 7. Article XI, Section 100-119.1 of the Zoning Code provides that the same shall not exceed four feet in height when located along the front yard property line. The fence height proposed herein is at six feet, requiring a variance of 33%, or two feet from the requirements. 8. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the variances requested are substantial in relation to the zoning requirements, supra; Southold Town Board of Appeals-26- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (b) the practical difficulties claimed are not sufficient to warrant approval; (c) significant economic injury has not been demonstrated by dollars and cents proof as required by the Courts; (d) the variance, if granted, will not be within the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance; (e) the character of the immediate area will be adversely affected if the variance were granted, particularly due to the nature of the use and construction close to this street intersection; (f) in view of all the above factors and the manner in which the difficulties arose, the interests of justice will be served by denying the relief requested. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the Variances requested in the Matter of the Application of CARL J. AND RUTH V. NELSON under Appeal No. 3777. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Charles Grigonis, Jr. (out-of-state}. This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Application of ROBERT AND DIANNA BAKER for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30B(16) for permission to establish Bed and Breakfast establishment in an existing dwelling, at premises known as 2900 Boisseau Avenue, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-55-6-9. WHEREAS, public hearings were held on October 6, 1988, and October 26, 1988, in the Matter of ROBERT AND DIANNA BAKER under Application No. 3762; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WJEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicants request a Special Exception for a "Bed and Breakfast" establishment, accessory to their residence and occupancy, for the rental of three bedrooms for lodging and serving of breakfast to not more than five casual and transient roomers, which will be incidental and subordinate to the principal single-family dwelling use of the existing dwelling as provided for by Article III, Section 100-30B(16) of the Zoning Code. 2. The premises in question is located along the east side of Boisseau Avenue in the Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 55, Block 6, Lot 9. Southold Town Board of Appeals-28- November 16, (Decision, Appl. No. 3762 - BAKER, continued:) 1988 Special Meeting 3. The subject premises is improved with a principal dwelling structure and accessory frame garage/storage building, located in the rearyard area, as more particularly shown on the sketch prepared by Robert G. Baker and copy of survey dated February 28, 1986 prepared for Steve Moraitis, the previous owner. 4. This property is presently located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District, has an area of approximately 27,000 sq. ft., and the only principal use permitted at this time is for single-family dwelling use. 5. Certificates of Occupancy submitted for the record are: No. Z3473 dated May 9, 1969, for a private one-family dwelling and No. Z14310 dated March 24, 1986 for a deck addition. 6. The parking area is shown proposed along the northerly area of the dwelling close to the existing frame garage in the rearyard area (see sketch, page 1, prepared by Robert G. Baker). In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (1) the proposed accessory use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (2) the use will not adversely affect the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the Town; (3) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The Board has also considered subsections (a) through (1) of Article XII, Section 100-121(C){2} of the Zoning Code. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception for a Bed and Breakfast in accordance with the requirements of Article III, Section 100-30B(16) of the Zoning Code as applied in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT G. AND DIANNA BAKER under Application No. 3762, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: circle, area); Minimum of three parking spaces at the rear of driveway towards the rear of dwelling (near the garage entrance 2. No selling of retail goods; 3. Owner-occupancy (owner must occupy same as his/her residence). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis {out of state}). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -29- November ~6~ 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 3783: Matter of JOSEPH A. STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC. for a Special Exception to the ZoNing Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 for expansion of th~ present property by the addition of a new building to be utilized for the existing automobile service station and public garage, in addition to the continued sales of gasoline and proposed retail (grocery) store uses, all as shown on the August 4, 1988 Site Plan. Location of Property: South Side of Front Street (Route 25), Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 45, Block 6, Lot 5. At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 16, 1988, the following action was taken: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 26, 1988 under File No. 3783, filed September 26, 1988; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicants request a Special Exception pursuant to the requirements of Article VIII, Section 100-80(B){17} for permission to relocate existing automobile service station and public garage within a new 1500 sq. ft. Southold Town Board of Appeals -30- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting building, located as shown on the August 4, 1988 Site Plan Map prepared by Garrett A. Strang, R.A. with setbacks at 48 feet from the rear (southerly) property line and 25 feet from the westerly side property line. The existing building is proposed to be changed to a grocery market with office and storage, in conjunction with retail gasoline sales. 2. The property in question is: (a) located in the "C-Light Industrial" Zone District; (b) square feet}; contains a total lot area of 1.38+- acres {58,279 (c) improved with a 51' by 80 ' one-story cement-block building and two gasoline pump islands, all as more particularly depicted on the August 4, 1988 Site Plan Map; (d) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 45, Block 6, Lot 5; (e) in the ownership of M & N Auto, Inc., Claudio and Carol Giovannelli in Deed dated October Liber 9673 cp 46. conveyed by 29, 1984 at 3. For the record it is noted that by letters dated October 17, 1988 and September 19, 1988, the Planning Board has coordinated its co~ents under the pending site-plan review. 4. Also noted for the record are the previous actions under No. 257 rendered March 14, 1960, No. 357 rendered May 17, 1961, and No. 624 rendered January 23, 1964 by the Board of Appeals concerning this property and the existing uses. 5. In considering this application, the Board has: (a) considered items {a} through {1} of the zoning code; (b) determined the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent-use districts; (c) determined the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, and order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (d) determined that the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning since this is a use permitted by legislative action and will meet the requirements of same under the zoning code, subject to site-plan action by the Planning Board. Southold Town Board of Appeals -31- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception as applied and referenced above, in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH A. STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC. under File No. 3783, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No major repair work to be done out in the open (must be within an enclosed building); 2. Rear of proposed garage building must be enclosed with fencing at a height of six feet; 3. No automobiles, automobile parts, dismantled or damaged vehicles, and similar articles, shall be stored out in the open or outside of the above fence enclosure; 4. The parking areas shall be as designated by the Planning Board and shall be laid out as to avoid the necessity of any vehicle backing out onto the street, shall be located not less than 10 feet from any property line, and shall be used only by light trucks and automobiles; 5. In the event it is found that the subject premises are being used in a manner other than that permitted by this approval, or by the zoning ordinance, or are in violation of these conditions or the zoning ordinance, the Board of Appeals may automatically terminate the relief granted hereunder; 6. Plantings, screening, curb cuts, shall be as designated by the Planning Board under its site-plan regulations (Article XIII). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis {out-of-state}). This resolution was duly adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -32- November ~6, 1988 Special Meeting ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 3782: Matter of JOSEPH A. STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80 for permission to convert existing building to retail (grocery) store, which is not listed as a permitted use in this "C-Light Industrial" Zone District, in addition to the existing sales use (of gasoline and diesel) and proposed new building for automobile servicing. Location of Property: South Side of Front Street (Route 25), Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 45, Block 6, Lot 5. At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on November 16, 1988, the following action was taken: WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 26, 1988 under File No. 3782, filed September 26, 1988; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, applicants request a Variance under Article VIII, Section 100-80 for permission to convert existing automobile service station/public garage building to retail (grocery) store, which is not listed as a permitted use in this industrial zone district. Southold Town Board of Appeals -33- Noven~ber :16, 1988 Special Meeting (DECISION STOCKEN,-Appl. No. 3782, continued:) The use of this existing building is proposed to be changed to a grocery market with office and storage, in conjunction with retail gasoline sales, as more particularly shown on the August 4, 1988 Site Plan Map prepared by Garrett A. Strang, R.A. 2. The property in question is: (a) located in the "C-Light Industrial" Zone District; (b) contains a total lot area of 1.38+- acres {58,279 square feet}; (c) improved with a 51' by 80 ' one-story cement-block building and two gasoline pump islands, all as more particularly depicted on the August 4, 1988 Site Plan Map; (d) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 45, Block 6, Lot 5; (e) in the ownership of M & N Auto, Inc., conveyed by Claudio and Carol Giovannelli in Deed dated October 29, 1984 at Liber 9673 cp 46. 3. For the record it is noted that by letters dated October 17, 1988 and September 19, 1988, the Planning Board has coordinated its comments under the pending site-plan review. 4. Also noted for the record are the previous actions under No. 257 rendered March 14, 1960, No. 357 rendered May 17, 1961, No. 624 rendered January 23, 1964, and No. 3783 rendered simultaneously herewith, by the Board of Appeals concerning this property and its uses. 5. The current zoning code permits such retail stores in the "B-Light Business" and "B-1 General Business Zone Districts, subject to site-plan approval by the Planning Board. With the exception of agricultural operations and construction owned or operated by the Town of Southold, all uses in this Zone District are (also) by Special Exception (see subsection 17, and simultaneous action of this Board under Appl. No. 3783 for Special Exception uses. 6. In considering this application, the Board has: (a) considered items {a} through {1} of the zoning code; (b) determined the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent-use districts; (c) determined the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, and order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (d) Southold Town Board of Appeals -34- November 16~ 1988 Special Meeting determined that the use is in harmony with and will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning since this is a use permitted by legislative action and will meet the requirements of same under the zoning code, subject to site-plan action by the Planning Board. 7. It is also the understanding of this Board that this project will be in compliance with Section 100-62 of the Zoning Code as to minimum lot area for uses commonly referred to as "shopping centers," for multiple uses Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief as applied and referenced above, in the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH A. STOCKEN/M & N AUTO, INC. under File No. 3782, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Compliance with conditions rendered under simultaneous application No. 3783 in the Matter of Joseph A. Stocken and M & N Auto, Inc. 2. In the event it is found that the subject premises are being used in a manner other than that permitted by this approval, or by the zoning ordinance, or are in violation of these conditions or the zoning ordinance, the Board of Appeals may automatically terminate the relief granted hereunder; 3. Parking areas, plantings, screening, curb cuts, shall be as designated by the Planning Board under its site-plan regulations (Article XIII). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis {out-of-state}). This resolution was duly adopted. Doyen, Southold Town Board of Appeals -35- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting Agenda Item #IIIB. Letter from Henry Ra!rnor, Jr. as agent in the Matter of Carrig and McDonald concerning intent of conditions under Appl. No. 3246 concerning future development and the consideration of the right-of-way 280-a status. The Board Members opted to hold this matter over until at least a quorum of the Board was present to vote. (Chairman Goehringer abstained.) APPROVAL OF MINUTES: On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to APPROVE the Minutes of the October 6, 1988 Regular Meeting. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION: PETER AND JANICE STEIL at Fishers Island. 1000-5-2-7.4. The following additional information is necessary before the application is deemed complete: 1. Four sketches of a construction diagram showing the elevations of the proposed construction (all changes within the fence enclosure); 2. Written confirmation of the exact setbacks proposed for the fence and actual pool construction from the west and south property lines; 3. Re-Notice to Adjoining property owners to be sent together with copies of a map showing location of proposed pool and fence enclosure. (To also describe paragraph #4 and insert Article and Section numbers from the Notice of Disapproval before re-sending, by certified mail.) {The previous neighbor notices were sent in September, and 100-125 of the Code requires notice to be within five days of filing the application with our office.} 4. Original postmarked certified-mail receipts with original Affidavit of Mailing, signed and notarized. 5. Staking of the fence and pool location. Southold Town Board of Appeals -36- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting NEW APPLICATIONS FOR COORDINATION TO PLANNING BOARD: Motion was made by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Sawicki, to hold the following temporarily in abeyance pending notification to the Planning Board of intended public hearing date and comments which may be forwarded before the advertising date, on the following matters. The motion was duly carried. Appl. No. 3787 - MARION ROBINS. Little Neck Road, Cutchogue. Area variances for lots proposed in minor subdivision. Appl. No. 3797 - F.I. UTILITY CO., Fishers Island. Area variances for lots in proposed division of vacant land. Appl. No. 3798 - ELIZABETH McCANCE, Fishers Island. Area variances for lots in proposed division of land with existing dwellings/nonconformities. Appl. No. 3796SE - ALFRED FALKOWSKI, Cox Lane, Cutchogue. Proposed office and storage. C-Light Zone. Appl. No. 3801 - WILLIAM J. BAXTER, N/s Main Road and W/s Elijah's Lane, Cutchogue. Proposed conversion of use to allow manufacture of classic cars and related activities. Appl. No. 3802 - HOWARD LUCE as Contract Vendee. Special Exception in this B-1 Zone for car dealership. W/s Horton Lane (north of CR 48), Southold. (Planning Board site plan review has been pending.) HEARINGS CALENDARED FOR DECEMBER 8, 1988: On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, that Linda Kowalski, be and hereby is authorized and directed to advertise the following matters for public hearings to be held on THURSDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1988, in the Suffolk Times and L.I. Traveler-Watchman: Southold Town Board of Appeals -37- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting (Hearings for 12/8/88, continued:) 7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3803 - JAMES AND PHILOMENA MONICA 1000-88-4-31; 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3792 - NICK THEOPHILO$ 1000-21-5-5; 7:37 p.m. Appl. No. 3791 - JAMES H. BERGERON 1000-143-4-29; 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3795 - PETER AND DOROTHY MICCICHE 1000-78-6-4.1. 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 3793 - JAMES AND STELLA MANOS 1000-59-5-2.2; 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3804 - ELLEN BLACK BUYTON 1000-107-01-11; 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3794 - JERRY AND MARY GEORGES 1000-51-01-22.1; 8:00 p.m. Appl. No. 3734 - KATHRYN FLEET 1000-103-11-19.1; 8:05 p.m. Appl. No. 3780 - ARMANDO CAPPA 1000-56-6-11.1; 8:10 p.m. Appl. No. 3805 - PAUL AND MARGARET KAYSER 1000-135-3-39; 8:15 p.m. Appl. No. 3800 - VICTOR & LINDA CATALANO 1000-128-6-13.2; 8:15 p.m. Appl0 No. 3799 - VICTOR & LINDA CATALANO 1000-128-6-13.1; 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3796 - ALFRED FALKOWSKI 1000-83-3-4.6; 8:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3807 - MOHRING ENTERPRISES, INC. 1000-70-13-20.20. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Sawicki and Dinizio. (Member Grigonis was absent.) resolution was duly adopted. This REQUEST BY BUILDING INSPECTOR: Letter dated today concerning lots with frontages along three streets. The Chairman indicated that allowances or waivers under the zoning code for lots with frontage along three streets Irather than the two referred to under Section 100-119 for "corner lots") would be more discretionary an~ therefore the position was taken that in view of the fact that such situations are not common or frequent, that proper appeal procedures must be taken through the Board of Appeals to vary the same. Southold Town Board of Appeals -38- November 16, 1988 Special Meeting OTHER NOTICES: 1. Suffolk County Planning Commission Seminar 11/19/88. 2. SEQRA Hearing - Christopher and William Connors by the Town Trustees as Lead Agency 11/17 at 7:30 p.m. 2. Thirty-day comment period ends 11/19 on the DEIS and supplements RE: Norris Estates, 28-acre site at Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck. 4. Code Con~uittee Meeting November 30, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. to discuss site-plan revisions of the zoning code. There being no other business properly coming before the Board at this time, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned. The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. pproved - ~!///R~ Respectfully submitted, ~inda Kowals~i, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals RECEIVED AND LED BY Tr¢ SOU aO D TOW CnEm Town Clerk, Town of Southold