HomeMy WebLinkAboutMULHOLLAND, JOHNFRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., Presiden[
ALBERT J. KRUPSK1, JR., Vice-President
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
BENRY P. SMITH
TELEPHONE
(5161 765-1892
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
June 24, 1988
Mr. Peter R. Stoutenburgh
President
Environment East, Inc.
RR No. 3 - 3075 Indian Neck Lane
Peconic, New York 11958
Re: John Mulholland
Dear Mr. Stoutenburgh:
The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees
during their regular meeting held on June 23, 1988 regarding the
above matter:
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees approve the request
made by Peter R. Stoutenburgh on behalf of John Mulholland
for a waiver of the wetland ordinance to construct a 3' x 36' x
12' addition to an existing residence and a front stoop on
property located at 725 Island View Lane, Greenport.
Please be advised that the grasses 30' landward of the stake
with the flag on your property, can only be mowed to a height of
one foot. No other mowing is permitted in this area. Should you
have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
Please n~te also
due and payable.
FAK: ip
cc: File
that the $25.00 fee for this waiver is now
_ ~,~'~'y truly yours F ~
Frank A. Kuj/aw~ki, President
Board of To~n Trustees
TELEPHONE
(.516) 765-1801
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
SouthoM. New York 11971
SOUTHOLD TOWN
CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL
To: Southold Town Trustees
From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Dated: June 22, 1988
Re: Wetland Application Recommendations
The following recommendations were made by the CAC at
meeting held Thursday, June 22, 1988:
its regular
No.
625 - Clifford Eginton - Recommend disapproval. No major
need is shown, CAC suggests applicant revegetate the
slight problem area.
No. 628 -
Anthony Panzarino - CAC divided the application into
parns A and B. It recommends approval of Part A which
is to repair existing deck; constuct a timber dock
with a fixed elevated walk; hinged ramp; float; and
consnruct an additon ot w/s of beach house.
The CAC recommends disapproval of Part B which consists
of a retaining wall with returns; backfilling; additions
to existing wood decks; construct concrete pads on
n/s of beach house. The CAC feels that the applicant
has shown no need for the retaining wall and additional
deck would be too close, and as a result wetlands would
filled. The land is stable, further work would destroy
wetlands.
No. 629 - Linda Wilton- Recommends.disapproval.
Check for possible violation.
Property is wetlands.
No.
Andrew and Bernice Lettierl Recommend disapproval.
Not enough space for prosposed project, presents a
navigational hazard.
Recommend approval of Waiver Requesns of Henry Smith,
Policano, George W. Bornschein, Venetia McKeighan and
Jon Mulholland.
Joseph
Environment East, Inc.
R. R. No. 3 - 3075 Indian Neck Lane
Peconic, New York 11958
516-734-7474
June 1~, 1988
Sbuthold Town Trustees
Town Hall
Main Road
Sbuthold, hr~l1971
FJear ~r~stees;
As agent for John Mulholland we are ~equesting a
letter of waiver For the p~oposed addition to the
Mulholland nome ag 725 Island View Lane, Greenport,
The proposed constrmction encromches on the wetlands
at fu~the~ than the existing Duildir~ with the excep-
tion of a stai~mT~
If any is needed, please let me know.
Sincere!
Pe tel~ R.
Preside
· Int.
BOARD OF TO~'N TRUSTEES
TO;~ OF SO. HOLD
Town ' '
Hall, 53095 Mare Road
P.O. aO~ 728
Southold. New ~ork 11971
APPLICATION IS HEREBy MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
TELEPHO~NE
[51~176~-i~g2
ID.ENTITy ;;OF 'APl: QviPoQ~IOQ1; Inc ~ov John
..............
LOCATION OF ~ROP~RT¥, FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED
BAY O~ HAE, BQR FRONTING
[BAy
PROJECTS IN THE AREA
PTi val;e
~/_A ....
IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED
INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY ~J~.i.l_y_dwelllni~ with addition
DESCR[ BE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPEF~ATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREM!SE
AND WHETHER ANY PRI OR LI CENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ER~ECT
STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE O~-DEPOS I T F I LL ON SA I D PRE~ I SES AND WHETHER
A~Y PERM i TS OR L I CEASES WERE EVE~ SUSPENDED OR ~EVO~E~ BY A GOVE~NME~
DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND
PREMISES AFTER THE WORK I S COMPL TED
THE PROJECT ,~.~.~ IF NECESSARY
PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE
INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEy OF
WRI TTEN CONS~T. OE THE O~/NER OF THE PROPERTY, I F NOT THE SAME AS THE
APPL I CANT.
· ARE ~THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIO,NS.. IN YOUR DEED TtLAT WOULD
P~OHIBIT TIIIS PROJECT?
; OF SUFFOLK
~ E~INING
VIEW LANE
PRIVAT~ FtOAD )
'~ RI GHT
F30"E.
OF
75.00'
CERT~FI:ED TO:
~Or
PLAN \il~: W
z4'
f
1:: O(O N F.> >?- ~ 0 ?"-,5
FO., U/'J/_,%A,7-/o~,J '
DRAWING NUMBER
//r/ & ~