Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeskouris, Chris Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Robert Herrmann [rherrmann@enconsultants.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:16 PM To: Bob Ghosio; David Bergen, Bredemeyer,-John; Jill Doherty - Forward Cc: Notaro, Frank; Standish, Lauren; Hulse, Lori Subject: Meskouris topo Attachments: Meskouris 1'-topo.pdf hi all, please find attached the updated survey by peconic surveyors, which has been revised to depict the beach (as defined by chapter 275); the edge of beach grass (which represents the landward limit of the beach); and topographic elevations in one-foot contours. unfortunately, the topographical data does not reveal any demonstrative dune formation with two sloping sides and a definable crest and toe. it does reveal that the steepest slope and most identifiable dune-like formation occurs adjacent to the landward edge of beach,where the land distinctly rises in elevation between 2 and 3 feet (from below elevation T to elevation 9')over a distance of 15 feet or so. the land then drops less than a foot below 9 feet until it rises back to 9 feet about 25 to 30 feet farther landward. (i suspect that these two outer borders of this first 9-foot contour represent the 2 places dave and i were standing on the day of our field inspection, although the more landward of the two is elevated no more than 12 inches higher than its surrounding grade for at least 30 feet in either direction). the land elevates again from 9'to 10' (1 Vto the west), where it then remains relatively flat until it gradually slopes back down toward the road over a distance of 100 feet or so. due to the undulating topography and gradual change(s) in elevation, it is difficult to determine what if anything might be considered a dune on this property landward of the first formation described above, and unfortunately there is virtually no language in chapter 275 to help make such a determination. therefore, it is my opinion that the trustees should derive their jurisdiction from the one readily identifiable dune formation that occurs just landward of the beach, as described above. the crest of this formation would be the seaward border of the 9' contour, which would extend the board's 1 00'jurisdiction to a location virtually identical to the landward border of the coastal erosion hazard area boundary line. i will be at next week's hearing, but it would of course be helpful to know what direction the board plans to take beforehand in case we could provide information prior to the hearing that would save us from extending the process an additional month. best regards, Robert E. Herrmann Coastal Management Specialist En-Consultants, Inc. 1319 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Phone: 631-283-6360 Fax: 631-283-6136 Email: rherrmann(a)-enconsultants.com 11/10/2010 l 10 LONG ISLAND SOUND oqF L \ o N45 50-31 Ems, HIGH WpTER `Sp• // loosq 50.31 "" 77E UNE Q � 7 fFQo Oj16 \ q G�O e E A C " d do 0. 1 e O a g 15) o rq FLOOD Zi i +c 4� EDGE OF BEACH GRASS FF�f Cr = 7 9' I�� FILED MAP LINE _ 200+0 r <0 f f9 S y�n pLF 9oi of / to —10 If _ ON COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LV r��1 1.7'w h�a 3 J°npilcs r Sn: m 16,Fir e/ n FR. HSE. ,4 F.F. £L fro' IR 265.33' ✓s��. CT �04£RHfAD iNR£S S 2'00'00"W 5 0.0 O'ED CC OF P ''E"£N7 £L 8.7' EL S..7' SOUND BEACH DRIE �"Cnsx aec MA7FJN ST ti e, Office Location: $oujyo Mailing Address: O ! ' Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank ~ 530951 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 GAO • iQ Southold,NY 11971-0954 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS 7 �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 Z .FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERNIINATI ulholwn Clerl MEETING OF NNE 10,2010 ZBA FILE: #6372 NAME OF APPLICANT:Chris Meskouris(Weimann) SCTM#1000-99-1-12.1 PROPERTY LOCATION: 530 Sound Beach Dr.,(adj.to Long Island Sound)Mattituck,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 2, 2010 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated March 3, 2010, based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following best management practices are implemented;A)it is recommended that the Board require the use of gutters, leaders and drywells to control storm water from all impervious surfaces, B) it is recommended that the Board-require the perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The width, composition and maintenance activities should be memorialized within a covenant and restriction. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: This vacant property is a non-conforming 16,540 square foot lot (to tie line), with 5,150 square feet of buildable area, in the R-40 zone. It has 50 feet of frontage on Sound Beach Drive, 328.02 feet along the westerly property line, 50.31 feet on Long Island Sound and 333.56 along the easterly property line. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit to construct new single-family dwelling, and the Building Inspector's September 3,2009, Updated February 4, 2010 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed new single family dwelling, exceeding maximum lot coverage of 200/o(buildable area). RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to construct a new two story dwelling on pilings, which proposed plans require 29% coverage of the buildable lot area. The applicant requests a 9% variance to the Code required 20%maximum lot coverage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This waterfront parcel is the narrowest of waterfront parcels in the immediate neighborhood.This waterfront parcel,as well as adjacent waterfront parcels,have had the benefit of the accretion 1_ r Page 2—June 10,2010 ZBA File#6372—Chris Meskouns CTM:1000-99-1-12.1 of beach sand building up and extending these properties beaches and high water marks seaward by over 100 feet beyond their filed map lines. The subject parcel is unimproved with a large area of well established beach grasses and natural vegetation seaward of the proposed building envelope. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20,2010,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections,the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The area is almost built out and many homes have excessive lot coverage.The style of the proposed dwelling is similar to that which exists in the neighborhood. The side yard,front yard and rear yard setbacks are in conformance with the Code. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2)._The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant could design a smaller proposed dwelling requiring a lesser lot coverage variance or no variance at all. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance requested herein is mathematically substantial requiring a 45% variance from the Code. The substantiality of the requested variance may be mitigated when considering that the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line may in some cases be more arbitrary in its exact demarcation on a particular parcel, consequently creating a detriment to the applicant by lessening that parcels calculated buildable lot area under the Code. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created insofar as the applicant chooses to construct a house that is larger than what is permissible by Town code. 6.Town Law 4267-b. Granting of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the construction of a proposed new dwelling while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT, the variance as applied for, and shown on the Survey of SCTM# 1000-99-01-12.1 prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S. dated August 27, 2009, and Architectural Drawings prepared by Frank Notaro, R.A., Titled Meskouris Residence, Sheets A-0,A-1 and A-4 all dated 1/28/10. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to follow all recommendations of LWRP. 2. Leaders, gutters and drywells shall be installed to control all storm water runoff from all impervious surfaces. 3. Covenants and Restrictions shall be required per LWRP recommendations for a perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line to the tie line as per the definition in the LWRP memorandum dated March 3,2010. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the • Page 3—lune 10,2010 ZBA File46372—Chns Meskouris CPM.1000-99-1-12.1 Town Attorneys office and filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board. Ayes:Members Schneider, Goehringer, Weisman(Chairperson),Dinizio. (Absent was:Member Horning) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing /2010 / Southold Tovm Clerl • Office Location: �®�QF S®(�jMailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank ® 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Southold,NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 June 11,2010 Frank Notaro Architecnologies 13405 Main Rd. Mattituck,NY 11952 Re: ZBA 4 6372, Chris Meskouris Dear Mr.Notaro: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's June 10, 2010 Findings, Deliberations and Determination, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above application for variances. As per the conditions of your variance; Covenants and Restrictions are required to be filed with the Suffolk County Clerk. Enclosed is the format for the Covenants and Restrictions per Zoning Board of Appeals policy. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the Town Attorneys office and filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of this determination to the Building Department. If you have any questions;please call the,office. Sincere Vicki Toth Enc. J Office Location: / QF SID�jyol Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs-Avenue) 53095 Main Road �� � P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 G.cti • �� Southold,NY 11971-0959 �yIrou ;N http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING.OF JUNE 10,2010 ZBA FILE: #6372 NAME OF APPLICANT: Chris Meskouris(Wei-mann) SCTM#1000-99-1-12.1 PROPERTY LOCATION: 530 Sound Beach Dr.,(adj.to Long Island Sound)Mattituck,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines'that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under'SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 2, 2010 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated March 3, 2010, based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to- this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following best management practices are-implemented;A)it is recommended that the Board require the use of gutters, leaders and drywells to control storm water from all impervious surfaces, B) it is recommended that the Board require the perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The width, composition and-maintenance activities should be memorialized within a covenant and restriction. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION• This vacant property is a non-conforming 16,540 square foot lot (to tie line), with 5,150 square feet of buildable area, in the R-40 zone. It has 50 feet of frontage on Sound Beach Drive, 328.02 feet along-the westerly property line, '50.31 feet on Long Island Sound and 333.56 along the easterly property-line. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit to-construct new single-family dwelling, and the Building Inspector's September 3, 2009, Updated February 4, 2010 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed new single family dwelling, exceeding maximum lot coverage of 20%(buildable area). RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to construct a new two story dwelling on pilings,which proposed plans require 29% coverage of the buildable lot area. The applicant requests a 9% variance to the Code required 20%maximum lot coverage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This waterfront parcel is the narrowest of waterfront parcels in the immediate neighborhood.This waterfront parcel;as_well as adjacent waterfront parcels,have had the benefit of the accretion Page 2—June 10,2010 ZBA File#6372—Chris Meskouris CTM:1000-99-1-12.1 of beach sand building up and extending these properties beaches and high water marks seaward by over 100 feet beyond their filed map lines. The subject parcel is unimproved with a large area of well established beach grasses and natural vegetation seawar&of the proposed building envelope. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20,2010,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property,and other-evidence,the Zoning Board'finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1.`TownLaw&267-;kQ)(b)(I) = Granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The-area is almost built out and many homes have excessive lot coverage:The style of the proposed dwelling is similar to that which exists in the neighborhood. The side yard,front yard and rear yard setbacks are in conformance with the Code. 2. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(2)_ The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant could design a smaller proposed dwelling requiring a lesser lot coverage variance or no variance at all. 3. Town Law §267-)(3)(b)(3). The variance requested herein is mathematically substantial requiring a 45% variance from the Code. The substantiality of the requested variance may be mitigated when considering that the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line may in some cases be more arbitrary in its exact demarcation on a particular parcel, consequently creating a detriment to the applicant by lessening that parcels calculated buildable lot area under the Code. 4. Town Law 0267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will'have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Town Law 4267=W)(b)(S1 The difficulty has been self-created insofar as the applicant chooses to construct a house that is larger than what is permissible by Town code. 6.Town Law U67-b. Granting of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the construction of a proposed new dwelling while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. a RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all'of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267=B duly carried,to , motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and GRANT;the variance as.applied for, and shown on the Survey of SCTM# 1000-99-01-12.1 prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S-. dated August 27, 2009, and Architectural Drawings prepared by Frank Notaro, R.A., Titled Meskouris Residence,-Sheets A-0,A=1 and A-4 all dated 1/28/10. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to follow all recommendations of LWRP. 2. Leaders, gutters and drywells shall be installed to control all storm water runoff from all impervious surfaces. 3. Covenants and Restrictions shall be required per LWRP recommendations for a perpetual preservation of all-natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line to the tie line as per the definition in the LWRP memorandum dated March 3,2010. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the f Page 3—June 10,2010 ZBA File#6372—Chris Meskouris CTM:1000-99-1-12.1 Town Attorneys office and-filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Any deviation from the survey,AW plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of'a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given-such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicatifs diagrams or survey site maps, are not-authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This-action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Boardyeserves the right to substitute a similar design that is-de lninimis in nature-for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Schneider,"Goehringer, Weisman (Chairperson), Dinizio. (Absent was:Member Horning) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). 1 Leslie Kanes eisman, Chairperson Approved for filing /2010 ' -' gg�yFFQ�►�' Peter Young,Chairman -� Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Go Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 `F Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 '1 Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., August 11, 2010, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Greta Schiller, seconded by Jack McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of CHRIS MESKOURIS to construct a new 1 Y2 story dwelling on pilings, attached deck and sanitary system. Located: 530 Sound Beach Dr., Mattituck. SCTM#99-1-12.1 Inspected by: Peter Young, Greta Schiller, Doug Hardy The CAC Supports the application with the Condition of a drainage plan for the new construction and a pervious driveway. The CAC has a concern with the septic system flowing into the water table. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried _ t :. y F ,at ,.y, 1'.,� i ti k..�� � �� ; "'�_.�-''Q`'�h� ,. 3 k �'" ,y '\•i.��-\'.� iii'°'.` ail !i!'tl'; : I�IIi� tr - y /r l p ` fit.` i '\ FM LF R. EL s , N EL I3 tt jos Frac eaAOE acxrf�AP 1 oa POOLS QG lAV MATER - 1.200 GAL SEPTIC SY��EFNDR/CAL SEPTIC TANK -8'0 4' LIQUID DEPTH SURVEY OF PROPERTY /- �I�QO GAL PRECAST C 6LEACHING GROUND WAOTER 8'0 x 2' DEEP WITH 3' SAND COLLAR (SW) 2' ABOVE AT MA TTIT UCK INLET TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6 J��� SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y, ��,/ 1000-99-01-12.1 1,0 ' s� ti°/ SCALE.• 1'-'40' NOTE / cPa0• a"/ °�yy LOT COVERA GE't APRIL 7, 2009 SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL i/ c, �O. AREA.TO TIE LINE = 16,540 sq.fl. JULY 22, 2009. (deck removed! t SYSTEM DESIGN i' P ,gl F F e`� AREA TO COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AUG. 20, 20091B.O.H.) BYE JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. �� �, �� /6,° �, LINE = 515Q sq.Pl. Oct. 29, 2G. 010 (CONTO2009 URS COVERAGE) HOBART ROAD e yv �° 1 ��� HSE. DECKS - /494 sq.IL SOUTHOLD? N.Y. 11971 ,' / , $ CPQ 1494/5/50 = 290 (631) 765-2954 6 Certified to: NOV 7 2010 4 James Meskouris e�� Chris Meskouris o,' 4' i 9 Lawrence J. Silberman, Esq. Lawyers Title Insurance CorporationFLOOD ZONE FROM FIRM 3610.3001,39 G O °� 0 - t > TEST HOLE DATA P MA Y 4 1998. �� rg11� ` /' S�S�' / McDONALD GEOSCIENCE f°O / f' I� ,< FSE L J5.77' EEL 6 4/13/09 COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE FROM p o COASTAL EROSION MAP PHOTO 59-533-8J. < , `'i� mss. ��` f ��� 2' MIXED SAND AND LOAM 0i�► 2 Q1bQ a 1\�y \ �� �j PALE BRO*N FINE TO COARSE SAND INTH LOT NUMBERS REFER TO BLOCK 2 "MAP OF CAPTAIN 10 4009\f L\ �\ �6g / WATERJOX GRAVEL KIDD ESTATES" FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY �� ) 1� `1 �J — , 5 �2 bzs' CLERK'S OFFICE ON JANUARY 19, 1949 AS FILE NO. 1672. WATER IN PALE BROWN nNE TO COARSE`SAND I am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL I � \y< P -`—Q MTH JOX GRAVEL AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE �' DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES P�� E '2` �` �' 0 IO' and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the . CLAY 'OV Newt, u�cNe�'yy' �i� G -11 I M W permit to construct. I / +� V ,9 ��� Q Elevations referenced to N.G. V.D. .0000 G� �P�e The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon are from field observations and r from data obtained from others. �� x,61 ��g� J�� " =a✓c ' ANY AL TERA 71ON OR ADOI TION TO TIS SURVEY IS A VIOLA LION 4' Q 618 - -OF-SECTIO7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. f .. o�� 49 EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS /,x ` a HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF ��7y CONICS �' 765- 1 SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR (631) 765-50n[ d 1797 WHOSE SIGNA TURES,A,PPPEARS HEREON. O P.O. BOX 909 AREA=16,540 so. FT. 1230 TRAVELER STREET 09_121 TO TIE LINE —Cl—prop, Go7-�ov/' SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 J ITECNOLOGIES ARCMITCfUM PLANNING CONSWUMONSMVICES 13405 Main Road,Mattitack,New York 11952 631.298.1129 fax:631.298.1128 P.O.Box 93 September 10, 2010 E C E 1111:'Ile Southold Town Trustees Town Hall ' 53095 Route 25 ,E SEP 10 2010 ; P.O.Box 1179 Southold N.Y. 11971 Southold Te"A ' �^ Fears of Trisees Re: Meskouris Residence 1400 Sound Beach Drive S.C.T.M. # 1000-106-01-35 To Whom It May Concern: Per the request of the Board of Trustees, we were requested to document the location of the adjacent homes along Sound Beach Drive. We contacted our surveyor and he produced the following document for your review. We added the pencil line indicating the homes that project out most towards the Sound. Please feel free to contact our office at 631-298-1129, or mail to: Frank Notaro, R.A. P.O. Box 93 Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Sincerely Yours, James Meskouris Frank Notaro, R.A. '®1,16.1 m1 ' ® 10®0.99 � .2 ,121 I p�L�,G N \ Got SEP 1 0 2010 . .9• per \ - ��' ` � m. _.._� j 1000-99� OI _ +1 O001"�31.1 I - 5.1 ,36.1 � MAP OF �OPEPTIES A T MA�1TI TUCK INLET e ����� 7i vNp TO V11aV OF SOUTHOLD l tr m 50 SUFPOLK COUNTY, N. Y -M Scale: 1"= 100' C{=1 ~`_' Y ' Sept 7, 2®1® YF ' S: l� I 049618 PECONIC SUR (631) 765-5020 / - P.O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET DWEL-L-INGS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM OFF - - - _ _ SOUTHOLD, N.-Y-119-71-0- _ "INFORMA TION AND ACTUAL FIELD SURVEYS__ ��� HSE FWFLR EL 10. rr�5 FRONED SUM EL B N EL res {— AP a ,r ;" I ' JEL 94CRO SDECT ION S E HIST YYEQNOF?IC` C SEPTIC TANK -8'0 4' LIOUID.DEPT SUR 3�EY OF PROPERTY 6- LEACHING POOLS 8'0 x Z- DEE" WITH 3 SAND COLLAR (SW) 2 AB AT MA T TI T UCK INLET GROUrvO TOWN OF SO UTHOLD A,,�► ,,,o�� ov' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000-99-01-12.1 SCALE. 1 4011 til APRIL 7, 2009 y // bp• �/ LO I- CO VERA GES JULY 22, 2009, (deak rOMO vodJ NOTE/ ,�6 ,1 00� / ,4'f'`_A TO TIE LINE = /6,540 sq.il. AUG. 20, 2009(B.O.H.) SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL // h / A .. , TO COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AUG. 27, 2009 /LOT COVERAGE) SYSTEM DESIGN Ll� ,i. = 515Q sq.fl. BYf JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. �` /�� �' h'S'i 8 DECKS - 1494 sq.11. HOBART ROAD / 1 A:•: (15150 = 29% SOUTHOLD N Y. 11971 (631) 765 . � - ooh /i / o `,,• . Certified to: / / / �1 �1 V la James Meskouris / , j 6'1 , Chris Meskouris �. / / Lawrence J. Silberman, Esq. / f O' C' Lawyers Title insurance Corporation001 TEST A TA McDONALDOGEO LE SCIENCE FLOOD ZONE FROM FIRM 3610300139 G O OOPP`�� ` 5 �`'� o � R-25.o0' 4/1-3/09 MAY 4, 1998. '� �� 2� O VoP �i'' �"p E F ,� MIXED SAND AND LOAM COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE FROM ?• '� ! / COASTAL EROSION MAP PHOTO 59-533-83. PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH JOX GRA WL 1h 6h' WA rE LOT NUMBERS REFER TO BLOCK 2 "MAP OF CAPTAIN' s�� �� �onP� `r�, UC - 'L �Z 4 Js' K/DD ESTATES" FILED /N THE SUFFOLK COUNTY �i0 CLERK'S OFFICE ON JANUARY 19, 1949 AS FILE NO. 1672. ,• a<` '^,�.o . ���� WATER IN PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND W1 TH 3OX GRA 6CL I am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL tU AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE = .�, r• ,D• < DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES 1 �;e..1 / �O° 61 cur and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the `-' '`�� `� �'� permit to construct. Elevations referenced to N.G. VD. 1 ,i �0 e►�, G Y,The location location of wells and cesspools shown hereon are 0 vatl s a and r from data obtained from others. �.� �� 5 �Y61 ���`� Q�) E C 0 U P ,:`��k4. 5\` from field observations ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO T�l15 SURVEY IS A VIOLATION 0. 49618 ANY 0 --OF`-SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. i Cj �G5 JUL 13 2010 CONIC S R ORS, .C. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209—SU�pIV1SI0N 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS ONLY IF `, (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF �Y SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR P.D. BOX 909 WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. 0 Southhold Town 1230 TRAVELER STREET 09_121 AREA=16,540 SQ. FT. •� ��P �I� Board of Trustees souTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 TO TIE LINE --;�--�r�� Gv��o�r q� TM , e t _ A���,�,.. A.�. tea.," s� �,_ F� ,,�, ��4.� .,.��...�_ ,.. ,.. •' ..yp.r., IT �w� d Y..� ��. "xn ras•� - M r„ tN.� �` - Irv° a +dr s• S c '� •j 1 ' . Or 7 WV h t,L,• 5➢ PAL4.7 i 1 A it IT VC �1�4 t NOTE: v, W CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ARCHRECf U OF AN V AND ALL REVISIONS WF TO FIELD w 5 COF76RT .GUENT,AND OR GENERAL OWG CONTRACTOR WHICH DIFFER FROM THE CONSTRUCT.DRAWINGS/SPECIFICATIONS. �+ z V O 1'11 U O O n 3� ai 2�0 24'-2" �w EQ. EQ. Q. 3' $" f _ _ _ � �- E IIII IIII IIIIMILL B 1 PILINGS.PROV.TOP CONNECTORS FROM'PEARSON PILINGS'FOR NEW 1 W 10'DIA.FIBERGLAS COLUMNS. (TYP.ALL NEW GIRDERS) I I I I I v EQ.' T z I I I I W I I Y - LII _ U Z III I II w III 11 I II W W E ILw /1r Ir J I III J LL II IIII cc III PROPOSEDLINE OF Z O �/� — — - - - - - — 49'-10° O O U E L - _ _ __ JI PROV NFW 10'DIA.FIBERGLAS PILING BY __ d F ,^- r Z I�2�1/0 RS FOR CONNECTION TC NEW T —F F__r Z O IF T I- r WOOD GIRDERS.MIN.BEARING ER PILING=29,000 POUNDS.III9NEER.REPORT ON ALL PILINGS. _ - —L - - - � - L W JI _ —JAI ELI III N I II I II III 1 N II II I IZ - - - — _jL__ I IZ - - - - - - F_ — — — — — — -® ALL IRDER -DBL 21_X 12' LL I.L - J - - - J I _ PILINGS. ROV.TOP CONNECTORS UNEQI F HOUSEABOVE, _ _ J FROM'PEARSON PILINGS"FOR NEW I' -I 1 I I (I I 10'DIA.FIBERGLAS COLUMNS. I� (fYP.ALL NEW GIRDERS) EQ.' III II IL - - - - - II IL- - - — — — — 111 fl I I I II I f-I III I III Illi I II I � I II I - -1� — — ID— �I— — - -® — — — — — - - - I 'LjIr N 5'-10' <�\� II n \ „M ¢ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4�� r ' ! .. z �o f.i';. U N O kk _ SCHEMATIC PILING PLAN GIRDER PLAN a � ' �C COo lbLL L 1__. Z)� SPF', ,,////•.� ,@., NLL OL TO jj(( {J` (_ '{J{ '(jj ��__ SCALE: DL� l� ? i! l:f 4� OFFICE SET DWG.NAME: llLl..dddd 1.28.1 O PROPOSED I PILING •i PLAN J U L 13 2010Err so�i.E vRovEwrc oP T w+cH. No DWG.NOm: REVISONS.-GE ANI­R MOOIFlGTONS 6V TH�EMCHITEGTG ANV EPRODUCTION ISN PART �L.P�HIoaV AW. A_O Snuthhold Town NOTE: wU CONTRACTOR TO NO'nFYEMSIO THE ARCHITECT OF ANY AND A DENT. IONS DUE T ER— COR6TT(SN9ZA HIGH AND OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR WHICH DIFFER FROM THE uu CONSTRUCT.DRAWINGSSPECIFICATIONS 1� z O N O y 7 3ti z e Vw 28' - F— — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - — - - - — - - — DECK - - 1�-1 $ci JB•M JB•B• 11'-9"x 15'-0" c----- a P„o DECK — — 9-a"x 28'-D" 1 JqOF it M. BEDROOM W O13'-4"X 15'-O" I D I I I I I I I III � I W D JBF ' DINING RM. Y II II 3' tr 9'-0"X11._9. , I �•. I I Q 0 LIVING RM. I ,Q W 2 15'-01 x 21'-0" 0' G1 1 1 C CL z Z BEDROOM #3 w W I BATHROOM 101-0•x1r-5" W KITCHEN 5'-6"x1a-0" R SC 9-01 x s'-6" _ IIS O E w JB LL l cn 0 w O J U) fr P 0 I I II -- I IV 0 0 PANTRY `' ° E 1 I 4'-0"x5'-3 LAUNDRY RM. a POWDER RM. I REF I a'a' RY' e,,.,,1, ..< ® , O Q 6'-0"X 6'-3' GR I - CC P W/D JB L n 42'-2" r I - V CLOS. - W 11 II UTILITY RM. 1 5 U-0"X 6'-3" Z , JB O 17 F/ li U. . OT CL I I � HB ° , I BATHROOM ¢2 3' 51-0"x 91-0" O ¢ 0 fL FOYER R I BEDROOM #2 11 0 oQ 13'-W X 17'-0" p O¢ Z 10 y N �w ii " M , I O_ pH UjD � sr I I ;, i I w¢ w¢ — , BEDROOM #1 ® N° No 1 10'-0"X 13'-0" a. --- 11 I al N 1� 5'-10" I 7d. 0.:-Pc�} W O J - -------------- - wU — _=------------ -- F N 9 , JB• JBa I O>OTu O>_ O(L H, om FW 14'-O" 14,_0„ J , @@ �� N¢ N¢ w¢ y¢ — — — — — — — — — — — 1 ,°z-9Jm„.��'' ti` m_p0 1pp m_mp u)0 �1��`: DI O O O IN 7 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN "'n N ^ m SCALE: AREA—965 SQ.FT. AREA—1,135 SO-FT. DECK AREA=110 SQ— FT-DECK AREA=320 SO-FT. OFFICE SET DWG.NAME: 1.28.10 PROPOSED FIRST/SECOND FLOOR PLANS As wer .r.s aF serMeeo �E Som PgogEqn DWG.NO.: wqf o�Ns.cRANGEs.AN°Nq rnoolR�gor.ls TM� PE P A-1 NOT=D�MNGS/SPECIFI�TIONS, V f W CONOMFV THE ARCHITECT OF AEVISIONS DUE TO FIELDCONNT,ANp OR GENERALCONCH DIFFER FROM THECONINGS/SPECIFICATIONS. rl� O UU O F h - �TOP OFRIDGE-------------- z a. OU .fie O - TOP OF ATTIC FL. i Q x� T �I - P TOP OF UPERWINDOW -t - - _ __ - ------ - _—_ v — — — —.—.—.— - - -- W Q 'llrm Llllll ry r I u' ti I < a•o I � I ' -- - _ TOP FFL. 0 SECOND l (VARIES) -------- �,' r F TOP OLOWER WINDOW 'III lil � I 61.8•• I I I I I. i i I i I II. I TIL U —' TOP O OF FIRST FL EL 15 ------------------------ 1. - - _ I iff Y 0 7'-10° w (VARIES) U 3 ILL Z �/� Z p w `� ° W w LL/r ¢ O NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION W _ 0 0 - - - -- 0 ----- ------_ __ _ - - - - r-.. a TOP OF RIDGE � 1 – -- – – OF ATTIC TTIC FL. _ _ O r TO OP F UPPER WINDOW W � - - - - -- - - - - III � I I I I I FIE _ TOP OF SECOND FL. _ 31'-4 - - - - — - (VARIES) TOP OF LOWER WINDOWI�,—,�1 I i T j 6'1 I I ' II I II I I II NI I – – – p - TOP OF FL EL.15' L I Ii- D , I T ----- o 0 to �LL Z w Z J 45 0 7'-10' oS o (VARIES) pfu o� w¢ w¢ Do I SCALE: EAST ELEVATION ' r�, r 1/8"�,'a fFr. SOUTH ELEVATION OFFICE SET DWG.NAME: n 1, 1•28.1 PROPOSED 15' y ELEVATIONS �(i+\ EVISION�HAN� Fmv THF<RCHrtECT.No ey; aEiuowwlao vi�wn�rrENn GrmzAnoN DWG.NO.: '..�'E�,S,•:,. °'' Y� aoYR wT�iro�"ie�sEnlar�v FrAonlr e�o-nol+w vArrr ,� � s> A_2 OgUFFQ(,� - Jill M Doherty,President P O Box 1179 James F King,Vice-Pi esident Gy� Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen ti Telephone(631)765-1892 Bob Ghosio,Ji Fax(631)765-6641 John Bredemeyer Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: 5c-' CHRIS MESKOURIS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a new 1 1/2 story dwelling on pilings, attached deck, and sanitary system. Located: 530 Sound Beach Dr., Mattituck. SCTM#99-1-12.1 Typ of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: apt.275 Chapt. 111 ' other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: r Jow 4o e—E— 9 L I i v Modifications: Conditions: ' .V Present Were: _J.King _J.Doherty v_J. Bredemeyer D. Bergen_ B.Ghosio, D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Office Location: ®V $0 �® Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank �® 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Southold,NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1509 Fax(631)765-9064 June 11,2010 Frank Notaro rSouthh:oIdTown Architecnologies 13405 Main Rd. 2010Mattituck,NY 11952Re: ZBA# 6372, Chris Meskouris es Dear Mr. Notaro: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's June 10, 2010 Findings, Deliberations and Determination, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above application for variances. As per the conditions of your variance, Covenants and Restrictions are required to be filed with the Suffolk County Clerk. Enclosed is the format for the Covenants and Restrictions per Zoning Board of Appeals policy. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the Town Attorneys office and filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of this determination to the Building Department. If you have any questions,please call the office. Sincere Vicki Toth Enc. Office Location: SOF SU t'/jMailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank '�� l4 54375 Main Road(at Youngs-Avenue) 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 P.O. Box 1179 COQ Southold,NY 11971-0959 �y�4UNTY,Nc� http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 10,2010 ZBA FILE: #6372 NAME OF APPLICANT: Chris Meskouris(Weimann PROPERTY LOCATION: 530 Sound Beach Dr.,(adj.to Long Island Sound)Mattit ck,1NY SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the ro e ,under co sideratio in is application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the St te's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADKMSTRATpE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 2, 2010 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for-reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated March 3, 2010, based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following best management practices are implemented;A)it is recommended that the Board require the use of gutters, leaders and drywells to control storm water from all impervious surfaces, B) it is recommended that the Board require the perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The width, composition and maintenance activities should be memorialized within a covenant,and restriction. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: This vacant property square foot lot (to tie line), with 5,150 square feet of buildable area; in the R-40 zone. It has 50 feetf front ge on Sound Beach Drrive 328.02 feet along the westerly property line, 50.31 feet on Long Island Sound and 333.56 along the easterly property line. ' BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit to construct new single-family dwelling, and the Building Inspector's September 3, 2009, Updated February 4, 2010 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed new single family dwelling, exceeding maximum lot coverage of 20%(buildable area). RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to construct a new two story dwelling oniling s which plans require 29% coverage of the buildable lot area. The applicant requests a 9% variance t he Code required 20%maximum lot coverage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This waterfront parcel is the narrowest of waterfront parcels in the immediate neighborhood. This waterfront parcel, as well as adjacent waterfront parcels,have had the benefit of the accretion i Page 2—June 10,2010 ' ZBA File#6372—Chris Meskouns CTM- 1000-99-1-12.1 of beach sand building up and extending these properties beaches and high water marks seaward by over 100 feet beyond their filed map lines. The subject parcel is unimproved-with a large area of well established beach grasses and natural vegetation seaward of the proposed building envelope. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20,2010,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b 3)(b)(1). Granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The area is almost built out and many homes have excessive lot coverage. The style of the proposed dwelling is similar to that which exists in the neighborhood. The side yard,front yard and rear yard setbacks are in conformance with the Code. 2. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(2) The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant could design a smaller proposed dwelling requiring a lesser lot coverage variance or no variance at all. 3. Town Law 4267- )(3)(b)(3). The variance requested herein is mathematically substantial requiring a 45% variance from the Code. The substantiality of the requested variance may be mitigated when considering that the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line may in some cases be more arbitrary in its exact demarcation on aparticular parcel, consequently creating a detriment to the applicant by lessening that parcels calculated buildable lot area under the Code. 4. Town Law 4267= )(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(5) The difficulty has been self-created insofar as the applicant chooses to construct a house that is larger than what is permissible by Town code. 6.Town Law&267-b Granting of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the construction of a proposed nety and welfare of ew dwelling while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health; safthe community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, in duly carried, to otion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and GRANT, the variance as applied for, and shown on the Survey of SCTM# 1000-99-01-12.1 prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S. dated August 27, 2009, and Architectural Drawings prepared by Frank Notaro, R.A., Titled Meskouris Residence, Sheets A-0, A-1 and A-4 all dated 1/28/10. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to follow all recommendations of LWRP. 2. Leaders, gutters and drywells shall be installed to control all storm water runoff from all impervious surfaces. 3. Covenants and Restrictions shall be required per LWRP recommendations for a perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line to the tie line as per the definition in the LWRP memorandum dated March 3,2010. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the Page 3—June 10,2010 f ZBA File#6372—Chris Meskouris CTM. 1000-99-1-12.1 Town Attorneys office and filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Schneider, Goehringer, Weisman (Chairperson), Dinizio. (Absent was:Member Horning) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). 1 Leslie Kanes eisman,Chairperson Approved for filing (o // /2010 9e as of Ile 07 02 0 M1 1 ol Ll IZ 07 30. 94 —1. 95 'Ile 9p 0 n0b T / DRTBIOT - 26A Cw 174 �kl STM KIM U."r PM ld, \(2 Is 'Mw 17 ( COUNTY OF SUFFOLK c E SOUTHOLD SECTION ND E Red Property ax Service Agency y G NOTICcamty comw :gzo4 NY Mol u - - E T.= FuIFA IN P mvc]1a 1000 D10:u.Prmurr Tu sFm>¢.mcr PROPERTY MPP 1319 North Sea Road Southampton, New York 11968 ^^ 631-283-6360 Fax: 6EN CONSULTANTS, INC. www.encnsultants.com ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING L Vn L -- j October 7, 2010 g 1, I Jill Doherty, Chairwoman �`f Board of Trustees Ii L; OCT 1 210 Town of Southold i P.O. Box 1179 —�- --' RotiOold Torr, Southold,NY 11971 Re: Meskouris,530 Sound Beach Drive,Mattituck Dear Mrs. Doherty: After the Board's public hearing on the captioned application on September 22nd, Mr. Meskouris asked for my opinion regarding the Board's request for a possible redesign of the dwelling he's proposed to construct on the captioned property. Upon my inspection of the site plan and the property itself, however, I raised the question of whether the limit of the Board's jurisdiction over the property had been established, and Mr. Meskouris indicated that to his knowledge it had not. The Board's jurisdiction should extend 100 feet landward of the most landward regulated area listed under §275-3(C), which for the subject property would be the landward limit of the "beach." Based on my delineation of the landward limit of the beach, which here is the well defined seaward limit of beach grass that represents the "marked change in material or physiographic form from the line of permanent vegetation," the proposed dwelling is located approximately 120 to 125 feet landward of the beach. As it appears that the proposed construction may thus lie beyond the Board's jurisdiction, I am respectfully requesting on Mr. Meskouris' behalf that the Board meet me at the subject property during its October field inspections to evaluate my finding. An agent authorization signed by Mr. Meskouris is enclosed herewith, and I thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Resp tfully yours, nr� 1A- i Robert E. Herrmann Coastal Management Specialist Enclosures 10/05/2010 18:33 2123714221 EASTSIDE REALTORS PAGE 02/02 v r vi uof cu�.0 1 0=sa VA4 EN-CONSMIANTS,IN( �]002 .r 1319 North Sea Road Southampton, New Yarn 11968 631283.6360 Fu Z631-283-6136& WC ONSULTANTS, INC. WWW.enwnsultants.com ,ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TO WHOM rr r,IAY CONCEM: This letter will a,Wwrize En Consultots,Iuc.to represent me and act o7a my bcWf with regard to mviror,mentalmatters andfor pmvits. I f � Signature f tint t I ' II I �� tris 01e , Loop kc, is 1 f � OFFICE LOCATION: �Qf so MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O.®�® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) '" Southold, NY 11971 co 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 c®u ,� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD E IJJ � I ! To: Jill Doherty, President) Town of Southold Boa From: Mark Terry, Principal 8 2010 UG 1 LWRP C So+at;ald to+gin �1 Date: August 18, 2010 Board ! Re: Proposed Wetland Pei SCTM#1000-99-1-12. Note: The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a conditional variance (#6372) for the proposed action. Frank Notaro, R.A. on behalf of CHRIS MESKOURIS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a new 1 Y2 story dwelling on pilings, attached deck and sanitary system. Located: 530 Sound Beach Dr., Mattituck. SCTM#99-1-12.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the following: Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney Jill M.Doherty,President ti Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. James F.King,Vice-President ,y i P.O.Box 1179 y � ��' Southold,NY ]1971 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. '�P� ��� Telephone(631) 92 John Bredemeyer Fax(631)7655-6641-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF a0U T II0LD Office Use Only oastal Erosion Permit Application D M Wetland-Permit Application Administrative Permit / Amendment/Trans er/Extension J U L 13 2010 J eceived Application: '7 eceived Fee:$ _Completed Application Southhold Town _Incomplete Board of Trustees _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination:(date sent) _LWRP Consistency Assessment Form (� .-CAC Referral Sent: mate of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: P_ ublic Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant z4 11-1'!�;7 WZ~&7V—'i e� Address OD Phone Number:( ) - OO7 - 10,,,70e Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - ®I I o�j Property Location: �'4 �ovPV ?rmr-TO, (provide LILCO Pole#, di M ce tb &ross streets, 4d d locati ) Tj I AGENT: (If applicable) Address: • �• ��� ���✓ �� PhLe: Bc 3 of Trustees Application' GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): Area Zoning: Previous use of property: _ Fly Intended use of property: Covenants and Restrictions: Yes __VINO If"Yes",please provide copy. Prior permits/approvals for site.improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspen by a governmental agency? VNo Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): ��i _ 551 � Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: li . �� b C'c�0i`'" .�, 6-s-°,,�..rcJ 1 � �� � t ��I-l� �'4� �,1.•lr..��� Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No ✓ Yes _z- If Yes, how much material will be excavated? �(cub�icyard�s) How much material will be filled? - (cubic yards) U'S'Qr"t��7 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: 6.6 X--a Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) _J 1—t�� Lru vi irus�ees r.NYl i c:�e�� WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Area of wetlands on lot: p,s®r9 , square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: &.;, -%� • feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: ze4l0t2 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated?-7 cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Uv Msy401t a-� Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): Jill M. Doherty,Presidentti Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. James F.King,Vice-President ,. P.O. Box 1179 • `�` Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio,Jr. y�/Q �1T Telephone(631)765-1892 John Bredemeyer 1 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of CHRIS MESKOURIS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, i �►�''i�-• O!tP -o,residing at/dba 1"0.7 Ir TO. '?�•�Z being dulwdjn, depose d say: That on the day of , 2010, I personally posted the property known as by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed.,August 18, 2010 on or about 6:00 PM. Dated: (siinature) worn to before me this L- day of 5T20w _ 441k� I Yotary Public BARBARA H.TANDY Notary Public,State Of New York No. 01 TA6086001 Qualified In Suffolk tyjL Commission EXpjfes.,(' D V, PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: CoMpLErE( THMSECrION ON DELIVERYu SENDER:COMPLETE THIS SECTION A. Sig to ❑Agent `( ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete `. I 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. )( Ad see ■ Print your name and address on the reverse 1, I.o✓ so th we can return the card to you. B. ReceiveQ,y(Printed Name) ry r�[I ■ Attac I this card to the back of the mailpiece, n�V V,° ' U r'l� ��'� ti or on he front if space permits. Yes , b D. Is delivery address different from item 1 No Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: I V V&- 3. Service Type ❑Certified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑Registered E3 Return Receipt for Merchandise �I ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 13yes------------ ti =4Q'� { 2. Article I X40 (rransA B5 02 M X540 tv'n the IPS f=orm — - ---- - - - --- - --- r,�'-the Notice ttie Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at "- - -x that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by IT (certified) (registere )mail. Sworn to before me this �n Day of Sr , 20� Cr c� V °� �� AUG 1 8 2010 Notary Public L ____ ��Sm'nold Toy,•,^ BARBARA H.TANDY - --� Notary Public,State Of New York No. 01 TA6086001 Qualified in Suffolk County // Commission Expires 01/13/20' PROJECT ID NUMBER 617.20 SEAR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1 APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME 3 OROJECT LOCATION. V* Municipality I �, County ©I/T- 4 PRECISE LOCATIOk IStreet ddess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmar s etc -or provide map I �V v illy� 5 IS PROPOSED ACTION New El Expansion ❑Modi kation/ teration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY I 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED Initially acres Ultimately acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ❑Yes '*1KNo if no,describe briefly: ��/�� � �i ��—10" 9 W AT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply) Residential F-1 Industrial ElCommercial ❑Agnculture E]Park/Forest/Open Space E-1 Other (describe) 10. DOS ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGEN (Federal, State or Local) Yes No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval 11 U01=6 A Uf OF THE U R LY V LID PERMIT OR APPROVAL Yes o If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RES LT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ElNo I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS�TRUUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name �--�I�'�,c? " R=T%� Date. Signature If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II- IMPACT ASSESSMENT(To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes 0 No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another Involved agency. Yes [Z] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: No C2.Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: No C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: No —71 C4.A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: No C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: No C6. Long term,short tern,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: No C7. Other Im acts,(induding changes in use of either quantityor type of energy? Explain briefly: No D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA CEA)? If es,ex Iain briefly: nYes 0 No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes alain: F1 Yes ❑✓ No PART 111-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS; Foreach adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important.orotherwise significant Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance mustevaluate the potential impactofthe proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting thl determination. Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date Jill M. Doherty President not or Type N e of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer %igna spon I Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Town of Southold C Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M.#: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A Olga i0bo '39 Da 12. 1 STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN i�sfflct— ec—tlon �Toc c� —lot--- CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? I Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within s .e Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) IS F.l Acres) (This item will include all run-off created by site M b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposedG> Site Improvements and the permanent creation of _ construction activity? f- impervious surfaces.) IS F./Acres) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Provide Additional Pages as Needed) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion E © and sediment control practices that will be used to (� control site erosion and storm water discharges. This — c., item must be maintained throughout the Entire U Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or / Excavation where there is a change to the Natural Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards of Material within any Parcel? 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities ❑ .Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand _ (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction ® — General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities Involving soil Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; Including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes / are part of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land, which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to including Construction activities involving sol disturbances of less than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for stone water discharges. (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious El Z for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP-0-10001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the Not.The NOI shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, F-1required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder -L-Z compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?(This Item will NOT include the Installation of Driveway Aprons.) Identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance is between 5,000 S.F.&1 Acre in area, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed in New York a Storm Water,Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of that Is knowledgeable(n the principles and practices of Storm Water Management Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit. (NOTE: A Check Mark(.(I)and/or Answer for each Question is Required for a Complete Application) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF.....G ' a,. ......SS That I,.............. .. ..... ` ` .............being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, (Name of individual signingent) 111 ----�.. ., Andthat he/she is the ...............................:: .��Y �......... .:.................................................................................................. (Owner,Contra t r,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; ..............J. ................ .....da of ... . ... ,20.1.E .............Notary Public: ............ ......... ................. : ....... ....... ................... ........................ ABAA TANDY (Signature of Applicant) FORM - 06/10 No. 01TA6086001 Qualified In Suffolk County I/ Commission Expires 01113/20, -:�oard of Trustees Applica-��n County of Suffolk State of New York BEING DULY SWORN DEP SES AND AFFIRMS THA HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND HAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/I ER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONEIN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS -'` DAY OFA v ,20 4 Ak&2,= Notary Public BARBARA H.TANDY Notary Public,State Of New York No. 01 TA6086001 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires 01/13/20 AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) �� residing at (print owner of property) (mailing address) !-tet i,P- e--7.Y• do hereby authorize (Agent) " to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board f Town Trustees on my behalf. Owner' s signature) 8 0 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE.FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: (Last name,fr t name, iddle initi ,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such -a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other ,name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest"Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee as even a partial ownership of(or.employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%o the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 1'1,6�'day of�Vi�Lr' 200�d Signature Print Name s Form TS I 1 Town of Southold \ LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# PROJECT NAME The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate respo Town Board ElPlanningBoard 1:1 Building Dept. Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: ❑ Nature and extent of action: Location of action: a Site acreage: u% Present land use: Present zoning classification: - ' 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: i k=4 A.-f-4-� i ���r •�r (c) Telephone number: Area Code (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No Jul If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation crite a. Yes R No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—ZtApplicable Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 1:1Yes ❑ No Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— cies 'cies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pa es 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ✓ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 th;Not 21 for evaluation criteria 1:1 Yes 1:1 No Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the-quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluatio criteria. Yes No Nat-Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No - Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste an&,hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public-access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of outhold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeZ] No- Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary 1 WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. Se LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. F-1Yes F-1NoNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town w ers . See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for ' criteria. 1:1Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote-appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable PREPARED BY' TITLES DATE 1/1