Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-9114 Glenn Goldsmith,President QF soar Town Hall Annex �� y054375 Route 25 Michael J.Domino,Vice-President �� l0 P.O.Box 1179 John M.Bredemeyer III l�L Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams i� Fax(631) 765-6641 COUNTI - -- - -- ------ --------- ---------------------------------------------- ---- ------ -- - --- --- -------- - --- - - --- --- --------------- BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 1727C Date: July 15,2020 THIS CERTIFIES that the construction of a two-story single family dwelling(1,200sa.ft. footprint)on ooncrefe foundation with flow-through vents-, construct a 250sa ft. deck-with steps,to around attached to seaway s, e �66s entr dgsl�wit steps to p�rrnmd elevate 33 above grade the HVAC units on 4'x10'wood platform, as-built enclosed 4'x5'outdoor shower with open trellis on grade walkways in sand with steps to front and side of house;two(2)retaining walls gpproximately 40' long and 18-24"hi : At 530 Sound Beach Drive,Mattituck Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-99-1-12.1 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated October 13,2017 pursuant to which Trustees Wetland Permit#9114 Dated November 15,2017,was issued and Amended on July 15,2020 and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The-project for which this certificate is being issued is construction of a two-story single family dwelling (1,200sq.ft.footprint)on concrete foundation with flow-through vents,• construct a 250sa.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling, and construct a 66sa ft. front entry deck with steps to og und: elevate 33"above grade the HVAC units on 4'x10'wood platform,as-built enclosed 4'x5'outdoor shower with open trellis,• on grade walkways in sand with steps to front and side of house- two(2)retaining walls approximately 40' lona and 18-24"high. The certificate is issued to P.A.D.Family,LLC owner of the aforesaid property. • -- Glenn Goldsmith,President �oF sorry Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President ,`O� ��� 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 John M.Bredemeyer III #L Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Greg Williams 0 Fax(631) 765-6641 COU BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES July 16, 2020 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Chris Rivera 250 Sound Beach Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: , P.A.D. FAMILY LLC ` 530 SOUND BEACH DRIVE, MATTITUCK - SCTM#: 4000-99-1-12.1 Dear-Ms. Rivera; _ The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of,Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, July f5, 2020: RESOLVED that the Southold Town,Poard•of Trustees APPROVE the Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit#9114 to elevate 33" above grade the HVAC units on 4'x10'wood platform; as-built enclosed 4'x5'outdoor shower with open trellis; on grade walkways in sand with steps to front and side of house; two (2) retaining walls approximately 40' long and 18-24" high; and as depicted on the survey prepared by. Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor last dated October 20, 2049, and stamped approved on July 15, 2020. Any other activity within 100' of the wetland boundary requires a permit from this office. This is not an approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Glenn Goldsmith President, Board of Trustees GG/dd ti SURVEY OF LOT 55 BLOCK 2 MAP OF 1411 2 2020 CAPTAIN KIDD ESTATES MAR FILE No. 1672 FILED JANUARY 19, 1949 00. SITUATE 00., MATTITUCK INLET TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-99-01-12.2 4- SCALE 1"=40' ud". NOVEMBER 5, 2018 00. OCTOBER 20, 2019 FINAL SURVEY 001. APPROVED -BY BOARD OFIRUSTEES AREA = 16,540 sq. ft. 0.380 ac. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD & DATE f-Vq CERTIFIED TO: P.A.D. FAMILY LLC GOLS STAR ABSTRACT 'y�g IG G� NO=* > 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM F.EL- FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103CO139 H & 36103CO143 H ZONE AM BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED\aG1 ZONE VE. COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD(WAVE ACTON); O 9A e 6� off, j. BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED 4 1 60 r G I AN 'q•' i R=25.00' qp'�v � 6 =35.77 41- 't:% PREPARED IN ACCO E MINIMUM 40 STANDARDS 1RFRORo S LISHED SE LI BY THE I-I -- U BYTHE SU0 S E D N kit 4) TmmTLI 4- 1AF -LP r 0 0 LP 7- ri P l EP\ OF QOP OP LP /Uc. No. 50467 .0 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION �OOiTO S SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF 1�0 SECTIO'MIN 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE Nathan Taft-Gorwin III EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING Land Surveyor THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN Successor To: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. IS PREPARED,AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE 0TITLE COMPANY,GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Title Surveys - Subdivisions - Site Plans - Construction Layout LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON,AND - TO TUTON.THE ASSIGNCEffnF1CAnEES ONS ARE NOT OF THE LENDINTRANSFERABLE.G INSTI- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS ANDEASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. James ort, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 Glenn Goldsn }President \OS�FFQ(�G Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, vice-President „�� �'y� 54375 Route 25 John M. Bredemeyer III o ` P.O. Box 1179 COD A. Nicholas Krupski Southold, NY 11971 Greg Williams �y ® o�� Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: .31�12b2d Completed in field by: Chris Rivera on behalf of P.A.D. FAMILY LLC requests an Administrative Amendment to Wetland Permit #9114 to elevate 33" above grade the HVAC units on 4'x10'wood platform; as-built enclosed 4'x5'outdoor shower with open trellis; on grade walkways in sand with steps to front and side of house; two (2) retaining walls approximately 40' long and 18-24" high. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. SCTM#: 1000-99-1-12.1 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=4 Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 ✓ Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: I II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: Q K y r h Civ STP ► p oAnS d�Aa) io/m C n oA STNt p d' sez�,j,?J I have read & acknowledged the foregoing Trustees comments: Agent/Owner: / Present were: J. Bredemeyer M. Domino `�. G. Goldsmith N. Krupski G. Williams Other �Ty Michael J. Domino,President q soTown Hall Annex�� O John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President �� l® 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold, New York 11971 A. Nicholas Krupski G � p Telephone (631) 765-1892 Greg Williams �eOUNT`1, Fax(631) 765-6641 � �� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: l 1 /3/19 Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction '/2 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: G. GOIa4v",A: COMMENTS: �y �0 !�;o wralk.,,�ayS �n Sid�S o 4 - r \ 1 1 - �OL)C� ��}a;rlisla iall� STgPC 0"n'l 0 AJOOC on P4SI � iclE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Glenn Goldsmith,President *Qf SUFI Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President ,`O� y�lO 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 John M.Bredemeyer III Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski G Q -Tolephone_(f 3 --765-1892 Greg Williams Fax(631) 765-6641 ol�COUNTi MAR 2 2020 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A WETLAND PERMIT DATE: �- D PROPERTY OWNER NAME: / i h MAILING ADDRESS: .<fo !r r %z6/c � PHONE:' -��� ' �� - ." v Ile- i Ce r'� Z AGENT C �' ' �-� z ive.^� ADDRESS So .L; '� � EccT1" ��r ; � 7- r j-z-c pe /v y Al PROPERTY LOCATION _�5`3o S,,, ,l c S /fir` ,/�.� rTiTvcir y J- " TAX MAP NO. - a/ _ /2• 2 . 4Me I? request an Amendment to Permit# - To �1 eu a k- ZVe u 14 L U ,aJ i -F s 4V.-V/4 i4 /.s <<,l �L 7->=v2M 1 s `93 irQ ad4C/ er cLos'e 7� e-/lt•s Leir, el Gy. A /7'j- ze!� ICuJ GCo �✓G i'c 7`�^' d r �ci r U cJ r! lGd1G� / �/ .S•r¢ rr�.D a��su y .�� u/. Signed ble-Z9 Y• 1 74- /✓ 1.0, 1,0.0-tom o Ir a../' . 6 '0�J ?.r S7-1evx o- &irk �' ✓ \ �7 a vs�� r-P',e,o eW k le e Liv q AW /� Zo� t Michael J.Domino, President o�*QF SoUjyol Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President � O 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders v, Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith ® Y� Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski ��couFax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain T 1 st day of construction Y2 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Perminee P.A.D. Family LLC residing;at 530 Soured Beach give, Mat`tituck,New York, as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 10. No right to trespass or interfere with riparian rights. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. Michael J.Domino,President �`�®f S®Ujya Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President �O l0 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith G IF p Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski ' Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 15, 2017 Chris Rivera 250 Sound Beach Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: P.A.D. FAMILY, LLC 530 SOUND BEACH DRIVE, MATTITUCK SCTM# 1000-99-1-12.1 Dear Ms. Rivera: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, November 15, 2017 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Chris Rivera on behalf of P.A.D. FAMILY, LLC, applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 13, 2017, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on November 15, 2017, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, 2 j WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees have found the application to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of P.A.D. FAMILY, LLC to construct a two-story, single family dwelling (1,200sq.ft. footprint) on concrete foundation with flow-through vents; construct a 250sq.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling; and construct a 66sq.ft. front entry deck with steps to ground ; and as depicted on the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., last dated August 17, 2017, and stamped approved on November 15, 2017. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: Waived Very truly yours, 0 e Michael J. Domino President, Board of Trustees MJD/dd - HOUSE SCDHS "REF. # R10-11-0035 F.F. EL. 15.0' 10.5' FIN/SHED GRADE EL. 8.0' SURVEY OF PROPERTY �P SCDHS AP AT MA TTITUCK INLET Pnq I.E. TANK 79' POOLS Z5� 6.D' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GROUND WATER ?'mIF" SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. P ,g , / ---EL.2_4--------- ---d------------- ,� / ----------------------------- 1000-99-01 12.1 Y"GLNtINO Vy �C� 4joj��� ��- � % CROSS SEC770AI SEP77C SYSTEM SCALE. 1'=.40' APRIL , 2009 PROPOSED SEP77C SYSTEM JULY 22 2009 (DECK REMOVED [1] 1,200 GALLON PRECAST CYLINDRICAL SEP77C TANK AUGUST 20, 2009 (B O.H) ��• / / ��� 80 x 4' LIQUID DEPTH AUGUST 27, 2009 (LOT COVERAGE) [6]8 FT., D/A.x 2 FT. DEEP PRECAST CONCRETE LEACHING POOLS OCT. 29, 2010 (CONTOURS ADDED) 00-S O y // �� BACKFILL WITH 3' SAND (SW) COLLAR, 2'ABOVE GROUND WATER JULY 7, 2011 (ADDI77ONS) ,�gl '1 O, LCL COVERAGE rr JUNE 08, 2017 (REVISIONS) O AREA TO TIE INE = 16,540 SOFT. UST 17, 2017 (CONTOUR REVISIONS NO TE. 1 / is � AREA TO COASTAL EROSION HAZARD APPROVED CJ8 SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL e ° / / LINE = 5150SQ.FT. _ SYSTEM DESIGN BY- �F,�j/ ��' OF�// / / �� 1494 5150CK 299 94SQ.FT. i :f.'•'40ARD OF 1 RUSTEES JOSEPH FISCHETTI, PE °01�/ ti� �o°�/ // / Al TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HOBAR T ROAD �o/ ti/ - SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 / / / ID ECECVE- (631) 765-2954 a 1' / // % �� /// °j/ '. „DATE 'Nod �INtWp ISO 2017 I OCT 1 2017 O Southold Town CER TIFIED TO: �' -o \ / JAMES MESKOURIS G��i /// Pi`'`e ��� °i o „.,,. Board of Trustees CHRIS MESKOURIS n �, / cS / —1 �00 //P� `"��► ' LAWRENCE J. SILBERMAN, ESQ. � LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION ��// i Q050 /ppP � 7EST HOLE DATA 7 / ° R=25.00' McDONA4LD/GE OSCIENCE L=35.77' EL. 6' MIXED SAND AND LOAM p. �5 � / -------- 2' - d� PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH FLOOD'ZONE FROM FIRM J610JC0143H \\� t � 1°0 FE�` o� 2 �9///" WAT_E 30%GRAVEL 3 6' September 25, 2009 \ �` k� _ J�j o S�� o� COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE FROM �1 w(� \o' S`lOj 11 I>>oo (S0V b COASTAL EROSION MAP PHOTO 59-533-83. (�®y pfr0j/ p� X90 `�� n>'��, _��s`t ; �� gP� �A��� �- WATER /N PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND W rL1 0'� - ✓'� '' ` F Q WITH 30%GRAVEL LOT NUMBERS REFER TO BLOCK 2 'MAP OF CAPTAIN KIDD ESTATES" FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY oG� CLERK'S OFFICE ON JANUARY 19, 1949 AS FILE NO. 1672. 0� Pm 3 cv- �� '� CLAY 10 I am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL o�Sl �� � ''�`�®� �'C�l�,� `(,aOF NIE yI AND CONS7RUC77ON OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE s °�j a , C ( ��. p DISPOSAL SYS7FMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the permit to construct. M4�� J�\�\G �� Elevations referenced to N.G. D. ,' The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon ared?,\C, Q from field observations and or from data obtained from others. ��� P�® QJG5 lC. N0. 49618 ANY ALTERA77ON OR ADD177ON TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLA77ON OF SEC77ON 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCA770M LAW. e � P C. EXCEPT AS PER SEC7/DN 7109—SUBDIWSION 2. ALL CER77RC47IONS ® = REBAR \,\,\� EMAP ORARE V�IES BBEAR!THE IMPRESSED COPIES ME SULK l� 04� (6 — ' AX (6,31) 765-1797 IVIOSE S/GTVATURE APPEARS HEREON. ® = PROPOSED ELEVA77ON P.0, ARES,=16,540 80. Ir. = PROPOSED CONTOUR 12JO TRAVELER STREET 09�921 TO TIE LINE SOUTHOLD, N. Y 11971 e7 1 a I 't S�FFO(�- Michael J. Domino, Presi 0 CSGx Town Hall Annex John M'. Bredemeyer III,Vice-Vr esident ,,� yJ, 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders y P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith • Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski y p! Telephone(631)765-1892 ��� �a Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: U /9/1'7 2- ' 30 Completed in field by: Chris Rivera on behalf of P A D FAMILY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a two-story, single family dwelling (1,200sq.ft. footprint) on concrete foundation with flow-through vents; construct a 250sq.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling; and construct a 66sq.ft. front entry deck with steps to ground. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-99- 1-12.1 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=q Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6._ Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet ,Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 ✓ Ch. 111 SEQRA Type:I II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment ✓ Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultaht/application completeness/comments/standards: Ne�s� S�, Ou �d 6e. av►oye 'anAwo,rd So 11S nt ar•y t ((Ica nAs `�'hcar) Leo':e! 5���4G1C Present were: J. Bredemeyer ✓ M. Domino G. Goldsmith N. Krupski C. Sanders Other Page 1 of 2 Michael J. Domino, Pres �� gUFFO(,� O r j Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President ���0 CGy� 54375 Route 25 p Charles J. Sanders y z P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith %�s Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: Completed in Work Session by: Chris Rivera on behalf of P A D FAMILY, LLC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a two-story, single family dwelling (1,200sq.ft. footprint) on concrete foundation with flow-through vents; construct a 250sq.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling; and construct a 66sq.ft. front entry deck with steps to ground. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-99- 1-12.1 Ch. 275-12 - STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT MET=X or Comment=* A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town: B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation: C. Cause saltwater intrusion in the fresh water recourses of the Town: D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife & vegetation or the natural habitat thereof: E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage: F. Adversely affect navigation tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the Town: G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters: H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity: I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town: J. Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland and adjacent areas: Ch. 111-9 - ISSUANCE OF PERMIT MET=X or Comment=* A. Is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location: B. Is not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at other locations: C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures and natural resources: D. :525% Expansion/Calculation Work Session Notes Application Complete SEQRA Classification Confirmed Coordinated Review Y/N Pos/Neg Declaration CAC: LWRP: Additional,information on comments/to be discussed/Public Hearing: Date: Completed By: Present: J. Bredemeyer M. Domino G. Goldsmith N. Krupski C. Sanders E. Cantrell D. Di Salvo Other Page 2 of 2 0 • fy 7 r A 4 i � re. �� °� r •'• r wry ,. .. 'r-lig i.''7{� �ati�R" � yah .�rrt. _•�"� �� _ ..4, !•af ( �'1:� rp - � - '. - ' ._ s_. -- -sic=. _ .. O " 9 w"L +d a�a �1F vt prr.y.•. r . ! ,. _. •' ' - 'r•'�"��+ ,;yam^.i �"_. t�- _ _,� . Chris Rivera <cdronthebeach@aol.com>(f 130ctober, 2017 9:47 AM To: Chris Rivera <cdronthebeach@aol.com> (No Subject) 1 Attachment, 130 KB iild .:Y. ZIP: 171; A;ftL, * + F n � ,�".:.'. �:t1L: �YiP'! rte•.... 'v , Rlyl P. Christine D. Rivera p a t�. Christine D. Rivera . Board of Trustees 37 November 17,2010 { Y i property owner have any'plans to address that at all? MR. COSTELLO: He plans on straightening out the bricks. How that will be addressed, we have not established that yet. He talked about taking bricks up and putting a better brace under i them. Like a more course,granular stone to help alleviate that. But the whole thing is gravitating down. TRUSTEE DOHERTY:That's a future application, right? MR. COSTELLO:And he's really just being proactive about trying to address the situation before it's catastrophic. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Okay,just curious. MR. LANCEY: When will construction begin? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Excuse me, sir. MR. LANCEY: I'm asking you, Jill. i TRUSTEE DOHERTY- When a permit is granted from the Trustees, it is good for two years and you are allowed to apply for two one-year extensions. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Okay, no further comments, I'll make a motion to close the hearing in this matter. TRUSTEE KING: Second. TRUSTEE DOHERTY:All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I'll make a motion to approve the application as submitted, TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Noting that it's consistent with LWRP. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Noting it's consistent with LWRP, thank you. TRUSTEE BERGEN: I'll second that motion. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: All in favor? (ALL AYES). WETLAND PERMITS: i 3 TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Wetland Permits, Frank Notaro, RA, on behalf of CHRIS MESKOURIS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a new one-and-a-half story dwelling on pilings, attached deck and sanitary system. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. This is an extension of a hearing we have held open. Just to recap, it has been found to be consistent with LWRP. As I recall, the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the application with the condition of a drainage plan for the new construction and a pervious driveway. And then there was discussion of whether we were going to ask to have the house setback to be in line with the other houses. And that brings us to where we are today to have some further discussions and findings which, if someone here would like to address that, I'd appreciate it. MR. HERMAN: Rob Herman of En-Consultants. Frank Notaro is here. Frank is the agent. He had asked me to get involved on behalf of Mr. Meskouris, as you know,just to offer some expert testimony. As you know, we met in the field, and the question that had arisen during the hearing last time, as I understand it, was there was an issue of where the Board's jurisdiction P Board of Trustees 38 November 17,2010 r actually began and ended. When we met in the field,there was, I it's a difficult site to determine a dune feature here because the topography is pretty flat. It's undulating,with the exception of what I would consider the primary dune formation that is nearest to the unconsolidated beach. But at the time, the edge of the beach grass, landward limit of the beach and 'those one foot contour elevations were not shown on the survey. The two-foot contour elevation, everything was so gradual over a two foot rise in run that we talked in the field about submitting a survey with one-foot contour elevations. I E-mailed the relevant sections to all the Board members and also to Lauren with the hope that she would get it to Jim. This is three copies. That's,the three copies of the map. When I sent the E-mail to the Board,what I had pointed out was that if you look seaward about where it says"filed map line"on the survey, there is a nine foot elevation contour that sort of undulates around. It's where you go from an elevation of six on the beach,then it rises fairly quickly three feet up to that nine-foot contour. And then there is a slight dip where the other side of the nine-foot contour ends, I think that's about where Dave and I were standing. And if you recall,we both kind of said it looks like we are out about the same elevation,even though there was a bit of a swale between us. So that swale is actually less than 12 inches. So you can see if you look at the nine-foot contour, I was probably standing on the seaward side of it and Dave was,probably standing on the landward side of it. That a similar swale occurs again up until where the property rises to nine feet again. Where it then rises a foot to ten feet, I think, is where that vegetation area is just on the seaward side of where the house Is staked, and'then it continues on, again it is sort of dipping below ten and back to ten,then when you get up toward the road, it starts to gradually drop in elevation toward Sound Beach Drive. My only suggestion was, you know,we are dealing with a situation here where when the code was changed, you were given jurisdiction within 100 feet of beaches and dunes. In addition to wetlands and bluffs. But there is no setback information, there is not really much in the way of definitions in the code to give you much guidance beyond you have jurisdiction within 100 feet of these features. Where the setbacks and definitions of wetlands and bluffs are very specific. So my only suggestion, based on what I found on the survey, I felt the survey basically revealed what we had seen in the field. And it seems to me that the most demonstrative dune feature here is really the most seaward feature just landward of the beach, which we had identified. And that is a feature that is fairly consistent along the shoreline. And I think it would be an easy natural feature to replicate from application to application and property to property. Conveniently, on this property and probably the ones on either side of it, if you extend your jurisdiction 100 feet from Board of Trustees 39 November 17,2010 that, what I would say the top of that dune, your jurisdiction ends pretty much on the landward side of the coastal erosion hazard line so at least for in property and the two immediately adjacent to it where the conditions are fairly consistent, your jurisdiction, your dual jurisdiction under 275 and 111 would both kind of end at the same spot. So at least you could have g something that could you replicate saying if you keep your house,whether it's new house or remodeled house or whatever, on the landward side of the coastal erosion zone, and that will also be landward of the 100 foot setback from the dune,folks would really probably only need a permit from you if they were going to propose any clearing seaward of that point. But otherwise you would know as long as the houses were set behind the coastal erosion hazard line they would probably be outside of your jurisdiction. Now, that may change as you head west because the shore does start to Indent in that direction. So 100 feet from that same dune feature might actually extend a little closer to the road than the coastal erosion line. But, as I say, on this particular property that's about where it would end up. Dave had had some conversation when vire were there about whether there was a secondary dune feature. I can't really see it here. There is just, I mean a 12-inch difference In elevation that tends to rise and fall pretty*consistently back I think is a tough thing to identify as a definitive secondary dune. But ultimately,it's just my opinion, I did the best I could with this. This is tough because it is so flat. But anyway I think that's what Frank and Mr. Meskouris had asked me to look at and that just follows up on what we discussed in the field, and obviously at this point the Board has to make a decision what it wants to do. As a practical matter, if you happen to agree with me,they would still have to update the survey to show,to identify that as a dune. They would have to identify your 100 foot jurisdictional area,and if they were going to propose any clearing seaward of the most seaward part of the house they would still need your permit. You would still have to set a clearing limit and non-disturbance restrictions, and at the end of the day I think that's what you want, you want to make sure that area of beach grass and natural sand area remains natural. You know, to the maximum extent practicable. That's all I have. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I went out there and spent about an hour-and-a-half today. I walked this extensively and I was reading the town wetland — TRUSTEE DOHERTY: It's not nice to be retired_ TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Well, I was concerned about this application greatly because of some of the jurisdictional questions and trying to organize thoughts for the Wetland Code revisions that might come in the future. And looking at everything from the basic definitions; what's a wetland plant, in other words if there needs being a hydrophilic and hydric soils and wetland hydrology, and of course you look at American beach grass, gee, j u Board of Trustees 40 November 17,2010 why isn't this one of our indicators. We are talking a pure meadow there of something that is, you know, has a competitive advantage and it only exists in that place. And we have a plant i such as Baccharis which is listed as tidal wetland indicator which we probably have a couple of the edge of the parking lot here. So these were going through my mind. And actually, the analysis that they made seemed to be fairly protective with respect to looking at those features. If you went purely based on unconsolidated beach material, I measured 125 feet to the proposed house from the seaward most edge of the American beach grass. So it's a matter of jurisdiction. And then if it's jurisdictional, then the question is the setbacks. But if we are behind our jurisdictional line with construction, it becomes an area for discussion. But I did labor over this, regardless of my current employment status. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: So, what, in your opinion,this is out of our jurisdiction? TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: It is. Shoulda,woulda, coulda. I think American beach grass, It's interesting,we don't mention, our code doesn't provide specific mention for eel grass either, and that has huge beneficial meadows, but of course it's below the mean high water mark. But in this case, if there was no American beach grass we would all be calling this a dune because we say it's windswept and it looks like a dunal feature. And then I was looking and, gee, does the existence of a plant on soil make it all of'a sudden, is that sand aggregate,which is under there. We know it's basic open sand,does it make it-in fact a wetland merely not a wetland because it's now consolidated soils because of the beach grass plants, all grabbed on to the roots. No, I totally agree with the assessment that was made.. MR. HERMAN: I think that's what I was getting at, John. When the code revisions were.done I don't think there was a-lotof focus or foresight on this particular kind of application. These are certain areas of Long Island Sound that lack bluffs. That's really what we are talking about. If you are on the south shore you've got an Atlantic Ocean dune system that runs from one end of the town to the other. And up here you have a bluff system that runs,for the most part, from one end of the town to another. But the exception Is that some of these areas were just glacial material ended a little differently, and there is just, there is a part in the code that just frankly does not really pay attention to this kind of a site. And so it leaves you all, and us, at a little bit of a disadvantage. Because several years ago, basing, as John just said,or as we discussed with Jim in the past, the high water line or higher high water line, it was just a very easy•measurement to make because you took whem-the highest high water was; you took 100 feet and that was your wetlands jurisdiction. This is a different kind of feature. I mean, beach grass, you want that to be a protected species, but biologically it's not a wetland species, Board of Trustees 41 November 17, 2010 3 so it doesn't fall into your Wetland Code. There is also, 1 think we can agree, no bluff. So you are kind of stuck with one of these two terms that were just kind of thrown Into the code. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER:Actually,the bluff is across the street. MR. HERMAN: Right, but without giving you any real language to follow, unless you are inside the coastal erosion hazard area, which this project, of course, is not. So it probably is something that you want to address at some point with the code because if you are going to take jurisdiction from what is defined as a beach or a dune you probably want to have the definitions of those features enhanced and you'll want to have some sense of what your setbacks will be once you are within that jurisdiction. Because they are laid out in great detail i for bluffs and wetlands but not for beaches and dunes. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: In this case, the highest storm rack,,as a point of information for the Board, those very high tides we had on the new moon, I think it was, the rack line was right at the seaward edge of the American beach grass,which is 125 feet. So we are talking about a huge-buffer. You know, huge natural buffer, I mean,great buffer. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Lefs,assume that we agree with all that's been said and let's move on to the other areas. TRUSTEE KING: I just have one question. Why did they have to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals on this application? MR. NOTARO: Because they consider behind the coastal erosion zone line the buildable lot. So we exceeded that. They gave us leeway on that. TRUSTEE KING:Are they assuming then that is all beach or bluff? MR. HERMAN: No,because the way"buildable land"was redefined, either last year or the yearbefore,what the town used to do, never mind you folks or anybody else, once you got to the building department for the purpose of determining your lot coverage where you are allowed 20%, let's say you have an acre lot, about half acre of that was tidal wetland, you now only have your half an acre, you can only fill 20%of your half acre. When they redefined buildable land,they added, in addition to tidal wetlands and bluffs and other protective features, the coastal erosion hazard area tine. So now you have to discount all your land seaward of the coastal erosion hazard area line. So his buildable land becomes that. TRUSTEE KING: I understand that. I tried to fit why they consider that. MR. HERMAN: Because in theory they decided that's an un-buildable area. But again, this starts to get into that sense of well, if you are within the coastal erosion area but you are not within a natural feature, they didn't mess with any of that. TRUSTEE KING: I didn't see that in the code. I missed it. MR. NOTARO: If I may say something. When we spliced together all of the lots along that road, I think I gave you a copy of the coastal erosion zone line on each individual survey is all Board of Trustees 42 November 17,2010 over the place. It conveniently misses pools, it's back,the next one is 20 feet further out. You know, there is a lot up for grabs with that because when they scale it off that very I large map, the pen width is ten feet wide. So where you place that ten-foot buffer can be anywhere. 1 mean, I gave you a copy of that. It's amazing there is no consistency on that at all. And that can have some bearing on some particular site in the future. MR. HERMAN: It didn't used to, but it does now. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I think if the Board is of the opinion that it's outside of our jurisdiction. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I think the building itself is outside our jurisdiction but the building Is right on that line. So there is going to be construction within our jurisdiction. And normally,when there is, even though the building itself is outside our jurisdiction, if there is going to be clearing or any other disturbance within our jurisdiction, we have them go through the permit process. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I can tell you based on just as a point of information, looking at the Board of Appeals paperwork, they are finding'there can't really be anything done seaward of the coastal erosion line because of the plants that are there and to keep it in compliance with the consistency report from the LWRP. So if you want to stay consistent with what they-said, then the limit of clearing or disturbance should be the landward edge of the coastal erosion line. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Is there going to be clearly marked during construction? Does the ZBA put conditions on it for that? TRUSTEE GHOSIO: No. MR. NOTARO: If I may mention, we are not building a foundation_ We are putting pilings in. They are very non-destructive, so to speak. So our piling will be from the coastal erosion zone line, will probably be three feet back, and we'll set up a buffer. We really don't have to go any further than that. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Because of the area,what would be the problem with a silt fence, a barrier on the coastal erosion line. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Right. Some type of silt fence or something on that line,to make it clear to everybody. MR. HERMAN: If they establish a project limiting fence on the landward side of the coastal erosion hazard line and there was no disturbance seaward of that have then actually the whole project would be out of your jurisdiction. TRUSTEE GHOSIO:Which is what I'm trying to get to. MR. HERMAN: The question is if they want to give themselves ten feet to say to the seaward side of the coastal erosion hazard line then you would have to issue a permit for that. But can't answer that. If Frank can put up a fence and not breach it, that would be the way-to go. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Lori, can we issue a non jurisdiction letter with a condition? MS. HULSE: No. f Board of Trustees 43 November 17,2010 MR. HERMAN:Well, you always issue a letter with the condition that it has to be no disturbance within your jurisdiction. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Right, I'm just saying if we,we can make a suggestion you put a silt fence or some kind of silt fence or some kind of fencing delineating that non jurisdiction line. MR. HERMAN: Lori, couldn't the Building Department mandate that, in order to ensure compliance with the Trustees'letter of non-jurisdiction that a non-disturbance fence go up at that line, and if there was any intrusion seaward of that they would have to come to this Board for a permit? MS. HULSE: You'mean can they make that part of a building permit? MR. HERMAN: Yes. MS. HULSE: I don't see why not. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: So all we would have to do is write a letter. S MR. NOTARO: If you can clarify for me, isn't that beyond the coastal erosion zone line toward the Sound? We are talking about where your jurisdiction lies. We are going to stay--we - don't want any trouble with the federal government. We would stay on this side of the coastal erosion line. j MR. HERMAN:Their point is they need you to be able to demonstrate that in the field-before you begin. Because we can say that the limit of disturbance will be here, but if you are clearing out to here, that would require their permit. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: And we are all in the room here, but the 1 contractor and construction guy Is not here. And things lose translation as.theygo down the 16e. So we just want to'make ' it clear. TRUSTEE GHOSIO:We just want to make it clear it's right up to the line. MR. NOTARO: But I just put pilings before up to John Burn's house. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I understand that. I just want to make it clear_ as it goes down to each person involved in this. MR. HERMAN:We have to give you a revised survey identifying the dune and the 100 foot setback and we'll depict the project limiting fence at that boundary of,your jurisdlction. If you then issue the letter based on that map, that's it. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: That's fair enough MR. HERMAN: In they contravene that,then it essentially renders the letter useless. And it will be Frank problem. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: At this point, if I'm not mistaken, they can withdraw the application. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Lori, can that happen? MS. HULSE: Yes,that's fine. TRUSTEE KING: We can issue a letter of non jurisdiction. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Then send an inter-departmental letter to the Building Department requesting that they issue the criteria that they have to put up a limiting fence on the landward side of the coastal erosion line. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: So at this point you can request to withdraw the application Board of Trustees 44 November 17,2010 9 • k MR. HERMAN: Okay. So based on that agreement bf what we would show, your hundred foot jurisdiction and the project limiting fence,then we would respectfully request to withdraw the wetland application without prejudice. TRUSTEE DOHERTY:And I just have a technical question. Did you ever get In writing you can act on behalf of the applicant? MR. HERMAN: 1 didn't. I was offering testimony as an expert. So, I guess, technically, Frank would have to be making this statement. But I can submit for the record as agent authorization from Mr. Meskouris. TRUSTEE BERGEN: If Frank can just get up to the mic now, then there is no letter required. MR. NOTARO: I would like to request that we withdraw our application to the Board of Trustees on this permit. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER:And ask for a refund. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Partial. Because we've already done— MR. NOTARO: I have to be quite honest with you. When the Meskouris' came to me and said why are we under your jurisdiction, I could not, personally, answer that. The wetland line, high water line, usually delineate that. And I couldn't I answer that. So I asked Rob, can you take a look at it. And ? that's how the whole thing started. TRUSTEE DOHERTY:Thank you. �. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Number two, Patricia Moore, Esq.,on behalf of STEVEN&OLGA TENEDIOS requests a Wetland Permit to construct a detached garage landward of the house, pool and pool house. Located: 17327 Main Road, East Marion. This was found consistent with LWRP, and the Conservation Advisory Council supports the application with the condition gutters, leaders, drywells are installed to contain roof runoff. The Board went out and looked at thls when we were looking at every,other part of the property, and at one point in the beginning when we were, a couple of years ago,we were reviewing the house construction, we were not sure if there was some fresh water wetland between the proposed house and Rt. 25. Since then, Mark Terry from LWRP is telling us there is not fresh water wetlands in that area. So I really don't know if this garage is in our jurisdiction. That being said, is there anyone here who would like to speak? MS. MOORE:Yes. Thank you. Actually, yes, I'm glad you point that out because the testimony right before where Rob was testifying as to the definition and whether it's wetland or not, whether we are in wetland jurisdiction or out of jurisdiction, it's always been fuzzy because we have the exact same land features as was just discussed in Mattituck. The East Marion area has no bluff, and it's a beach area. So consistently we have been measuring from the Spring high tide and we have been landward of the coastal erosion. So I similarly agree that this garage is not within the jurisdiction. And based on what you previously ruled, we are going to identify the 100 foot line and what activities we conduct landward of the hundred foot line is ell, 0, SOA( .4 4ANC) O Ol 11,10 4� DISTRICT z 6A Y jr � ol ml 4, oC-) 25 2B 4A(.) 4 31Ais 172N.) I- 19 O Ir STATE OF NEW YORK) 12) 2 4 16 11A(c) 2 "NO U5 FOR PCL SEE • FOR PCL NO!" 1 sOESEc No 17 1�1 ——-- om 41 SEE SEC I"I. Jam* 6 Is MS�RD CR _' Property Tax Service Agen yNOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK @ K SOUTHOLD SECTION NO E Real Cy N111.1099 m A zi-.� p 1m ,mei x0 100D PROPERTY NIAP OFFICE LOCATION: ®��®v ®UMAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) �s Southold, NY 11971 a� Telephone: 631 765-1938 PM 1 10 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael Domino, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date: November 14, 2017 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for P A D FAMILY, LLC SCTM# 1000-99-1-12.1 Chris Rivera on behalf of P A D FAMILY, LLC requests'a Wetland Permit to construct a two-story, single family dwelling (1,200sq.ft. footprint) on concrete foundation with flow-through vents; 'construct a 250sq.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling; and construct a 66sq:ft. front entry deck with steps to ground. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-99-1-12.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the following is required to meet Policy 6. 1. Establish a non-disturbance buffer seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line preserving the existing, beneficial vegetation n this sensitive area. The establishment of a 4' wide access path to the beach should be excluded. The width, composition and maintenance activities could be memorialized in a covenant and restriction. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 i► Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., November 8, 2017 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Caroline Burghardt, seconded by James Abbott, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of PAD FAMILY LLC to construct a single- family, two-story dwelling on concrete foundation with flo-through vents and attached decks. Located: 530 Sound Beach Dr., Mattituck. SCTM#99-1-12.1 Inspected by: Caroline Burghardt, James Abbott The CAC Supports the application with the Condition there is no disturbance seaward of the CEHA with the exception of a hand-cleared 4' wide path to access the water. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried _ �� 543/o Main ttoad Michael J Domino- V+ce-PrestdCnt P O Box 1179 James F Feng- Trustee Y Sc Gild New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen-Trustee Telephone(630 765-1892 Charles J" Sandcr5. Trustee �COUNT( Fax(631) 765-6641 l ,�� - BOAIM OF TOWN" TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD D � D To- Southold-Town Building Department - - -- - OCT . 1 6 2017 Re- Verification of Building Department Permit Requirements $DYI,DINC*DEM qq—1 — I2, 1 " TOWN OF SO OLD SCTM#: P A- D Fig-Mii,� � - Property Owner Blame: Date Sent to Bldg- Dept-: The Office of the Board of Trustees is forwarding the above referenced application for verification of the Building Department's permitting requirements stated below: YES NO Will the proposed.project require a Building Pemuit? Wi I the proposed project require a variance determination from e Zoning Board of Appeals? Will any part of this application be considered as Demolifion as -described under Town Code? COMMENTS: - Za S -7 Q A N 0 --------- --- - ----- -- -------- --------- ---------- gna ure of eviewer Date J Ij Office Location: hO�*QE SO(Jlyolo Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) 4 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 • Southold,NY 1 1 971-0959 �yDDUN1`i,N�� http://southoldtown.northfork-.net RSC-IVE BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 6 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATI ub;;o;;�Totitit Clerl. MEETING OF JUNE 10,2010 ZBA FILE: #6372 NAME OF APPLICANT:Chris Meskouris(Weimann) SCTM#1000-99-1-12.1 PROPERTY LOCATION: 530 Sound Beach Dr.,(adj.to Long Island Sound)Mattituck,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 2, 2010 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP: This application was referred for reviewed under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his reply dated March 3, 2010, based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following best management practices are implemented;A) it is recommended that the Board require the use of gutters,leaders and drywells to control storm water from all impervious surfaces, B) it is recommended that the Board require the perpetual preservation of all natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The width, composition and maintenance activities should be memorialized within a covenant and restriction. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: This vacant property is a non-conforming 16,540 square foot lot (to tie line), with 5,150 square feet of buildable area, in the R-40 zone. It has 50 feet of frontage on Sound Beach Drive, 328.02 feet along the westerly property line, 50.31 feet on Long Island Sound and 333.56 along the easterly property line. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Code Section 280-124, based on an application for building permit to construct new single-family dwelling, and the Building Inspector's September 3, 2009, Updated February 4, 2010 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed new single family dwelling, exceeding maximum lot coverage of 20%(buildable area). RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to construct a new two story dwelling on pilings, which proposed plans require 29% coverage of the buildable lot area. The applicant requests a 9% variance to the Code required 20%maximum lot coverage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This waterfront parcel is the narrowest of waterfront parcels in the immediate neighborhood.This waterfront parcel,as well as adjacent waterfront parcels,have had the benefit of the accretion Page 2—June 10,2010 ZBA File46372—Chris Meskouns CTM 1000-99-1-12.1 of beach sand building up and extending these properties beaches and high water marks seaward by over 100 feet beyond their filed map lines. The subject parcel is unimproved with a large area of well established beach grasses and natural vegetation seaward of the proposed building envelope. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20,2010,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The-area is almost built out and many homes have excessive lot coverage. The style of the proposed dwelling is similar to that which exists in the neighborhood. The side yard,front yard and rear yard setbacks are in conformance with the Code. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant could design a smaller proposed dwelling requiring a lesser lot coverage variance or no variance at all. 3. Town Law &267-b(3}(b)(3). The variance requested herein is mathematically substantial requiring a 45% variance from the Code. The substantiality of the requested variance may be mitigated when considering that the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line may in some cases be more arbitrary in its exact demarcation on a particular parcel, consequently creating a detriment to the applicant by lessening that parcels calculated buildable lot area under the Code. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4)No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 5. Town Law 267-b 3 b 5 . The difficulty has been self-created insofar as the applicant chooses to construct a house that is larger than what is permissible by Town code. 6.Town Law 11267-b. Granting of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the construction of a proposed new dwelling while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT, the variance as applied for, and shown on the Survey of SCTM # 1000-99-01-12.1 prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S. dated August 27, 2009, and Architectural Drawings prepared by Frank Notaro, R.A., Titled Meskouris Residence, Sheets A-0,A-I and A-4 all dated 1/28/10. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to follow all recommendations of LWRP. 2. Leaders, gutters and drywells shall be installed to control all storm water runoff from all impervious surfaces. 3. Covenants and Restrictions shall be required per LWRP recommendations for a perpetual preservation of a]I natural vegetation seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line to the tie line as per the definition in the LWRP memorandum dated March 3,2010. Such Covenants and Restrictions shall be approved by the i Page 3—Atne 10,2010 ZBA Fde#6372—Chris Meskouris CTM- 1000-99-1-12.1 Town Attorneys office and filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and a recorded copy submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit,and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Bow-& Ayes:Members Schneider, Goehringer, Weisman (Chairperson),Dinizio. (Absent was:Member Horning) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). + g= Leslie Kanes eisman,Chairperson Approved for filing /2010 / Southold Toren Clerk N F _ ¢I! Az 10ALrrao Scor a• 4c •jb ne 1<,., C I ,. 9 dr4� Asn rum TSM r rt ram ICRW6AL PR£CAS S�ST%R GAL SEPTIC TANK-8'0 4'L/OUID DEPTH SURVEY OF PROPERTY 6-LEACHNIG POOLS 6V+YLZ'DEEP WITH 3' LAR(SW)2 SAND COL 'ABOVE r� GROUND WATER AT MATTITUCK INLET 9 1A: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK Y N.Y. COUNT 1000-99 01-12.1 SCALE. 1' 40' / �. �/ APRIL 7, 2009 NOTE, / L�r COVERAGE SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL /,d bl Qj� �/ ATFA TO TIE LINE-16,540 so. JULY Zz,ZOOS (d.9t r ma-) SYSTEM DE S/GN / a, F / A?CA TO COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AUG. 20 2009(B.O.H.) BYE JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E, l /' / L N£+5150 rq,/l, AUG. 21, 2009 (LOT COVERAGE) HOBART SOIJTW NY//97/ x 1" �� J� h SE 6 DECKS-1494 sq.It. (631) 765-/2954 /J4/5150+2 Ej� l - Ceru(ied to: // J, James Meskouns , Chns Meskouns / r/ l� �/ i ..• �L�7!� Lawrence J.Sdbennan,Eaq Lawyers Ttue Insurance Corporation / 4 / v�•G� ..a _ n �...io fy9 / -0 r. FLOOD ZONE FROM FIRM J610JCOIJ9 C � E /I!' TEST HOLE DATA MAY 4, 1996. C i GOp � a ) S�5E McDONALD OEOSCIENCE lG W� �P r� ,Nd i R-.?Joo' 4/1Ji09 2 fly , FEV L-JO.IY 0.6, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE FROM G� •O d' y�/ i•. COASTAL EROSION MAP PHOTO 59-5JJ-BJ. a• L 4/ ��\ �s ff. YX£D SWD A10 LOAM LOT NUMBERS REFER TO BLOCK 2 "MAP OF CAPTAIN G� 10 �6 �` `� PALC BROW FINE TO COARSE SMD WM KIDD ESTATES"FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY �'r m t° n°6�u', \ _ 65 MArr Jos raA.EL CLERK'S OFFICE ON JANUARY 19, 1949 AS FILE NO. 1672. Jif ry < 9 TO:..'A I P ! •�{.�' t I am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL WATER W PALE BROOK RNE TO COARSC SANO Q AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE MN JOX GRAM ���I �''l •„• Af DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the o 0 t n1� l0 c w yp'p,b d.l� CLAY permit to construct. r� Y • Elevations referenced to N C V.D. The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon are I from field observations and or /ram data obtained from others. �, a fir o INAL MAP ANY ALTERATION OR ADD1770M TO +,S SURVEY IS A WOLA77ON 9 I P I + .� ��•= EXCEPT IOv 7209 THE NEW YORK STArE EDUCATION LAW c ,t(�„ REVIEWED BY ZBA i Y. Tfi'. K 615 EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SU510/NSI0N 1 ALL CER17FICAT)ONS DO 5 /_ �1 HEREpv ARE VALID FOR IVIS MAP AND COPIES 7NERELI�ONLY IF �G SEE DEC�SION i (y.DJ7C' CONIC S R -1797 SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR '`� AeCO /C SOR 20 5 i WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HfREOV. Q�t�'' DATED_l j 0 1� P D• BOX 909 AREA-16,SQ SO. FT. a = A'^P 1230 TO TIE LINE — —r"aP �'dr"r SOUTHOLD. N Y. 1971 STREET of ®F SOU" Michael J.Domino,President ®� 170, Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders v, Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski lyC®UNTI Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD This Section For Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application � a(C" 2 E � n Vn Administrative Permit D Amendment/Transfer/ExtensionID Received Application: `��l3`17 3 Received Fee: $ O OCT 2017 Completed Application: Incomplete:, Southold Town SEQRA Classification: Type I_ Type II Unlisted Boardo Trustees Lead Agency Determination: Coordination-(date sent): Z:: R Consistency Assessment Form Sent. CAC Referral Sent: Date of-Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: 11,l.--1 Resolution: Q 19 PAM! V (111(21 Legal Name of Property Owner(s): ►s �„ Mailing Address: + v © ��� a �c�l. r . Phone Number: q► - 1 ,3 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 2— Property •Property Location: .S 3 o _C-A c3 w J Q( • ccs (If necessary, provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT (If applicable): I,%Y;S t v e V-� Se( � -® � Mailing Address: 62 Sly �o v-a Phone Number: L � � �C � SC'os �1 kA Board of Trustees Applicf ).on GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): Area Zoning: V 0 Previous use of property: e4__ w'-�- Intended use of property: Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes No If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? ✓Yes No If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes k No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes ✓ No Does the structure,(s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? Yes I-I/ 'No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No L__—Yes If yes,provide explanation: Gv4 �' t •u� ° /•✓� �� s � Project Description (use attachments if necessary): C 6-n sN'v ck- 0— S}�r 0 n Vt*k 0_V%_Lkek�-L �V_V-A-11 1',A�0 CJ I I V, -w - 4tL,,v i�CP 0 -C - `�c macV 5 u -C F Ti--0, Acv_ (o G S r . : Board of Trustees Applic. _1,on WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Area of wetlands on lot: 10-/a,voo ? square feet f-r o oxy, Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? --? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: L''�7`�-c✓ Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): 4 o.Ve 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor/Information e-le,V-W Name of Action or Project: J Project Location(describe,and attach a location maK. —reV rlrl 64- Brief 4 Brief Description of Proposed Action: I to Name ofApplica o poonsor: Telephone: /hf G�'t.Qi' ��c.�- E-Mail:� r.C►s1 T�i��J ��� �• Address: '. City/PO: S t Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that P' ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 3'0G,Ceres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? I a 3,5 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban E]Rural(non-agriculture) [—]Industrial E]Commercial Pl esidential (suburban) EJ Forest ❑Agriculture El Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page I of 4 t 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ 6. is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located ' or does it adjoin},a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: We—����✓— �,�� /&F' 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES ET F-1- b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ET ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? Er ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: El Er 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: s-,1X11e w, 4> ❑ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? � ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ®" b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? © ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Iden ' the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: jg!:!TS 'ne ❑Forest ❑Agri cultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional Wetland [I Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 21" ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ,�NO DYES E] 1:1 b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and sto drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO YES Page 2 of 4 —, f- 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: F�T ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: F I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE \ Applicant/sp/onw�i�r nwse: Date: �������7 Signature�" c, J Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the ❑ establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate El available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: I A I ❑ a.public/private water supplies? I A b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? Ef 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, F]waterbodies,groundwater, air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 I No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage 1:1problems? [A _i�' 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? El Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental W i p ts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees G Name of Lead A ency Date President Print or T pe N e of Spon ' e Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Resp nsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION IO V (Where the applicant is 110t the owlier) I/We, 4 , 'S `.� owners of tile property identified as SCTM { 1000- in the towrl of � /• vG �� k„� ,New York, hereby authoriz'6/1 -------- to tact as my agent:and handle all ,2„ necessary work involved with the;application process for pennit(s) froin the Southold Town Board orrrustees for this property. Property Owner's Signature C trop Ty C)wner's Si iaturc fey SWORNTO BEFORE UR) M 'f l IfS DAY OF 20 f Notary public "�"°..,..._.�._... �.,._._ SARAH JOOHYUN KIM Notary Public—State of New York NO 01KI6054927 Qualified in Nassau County My Commission Expires Feb 12 20-P z 'd X5!'3 121i"IRSTI dH Xd9£:ZO LT/OT/OT Board of Trustees Applin ion AFFIDAVIT a_�L,g ��%_S L jou BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAI'HE/SHE 1S THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BIC,ST OF HIS/HER YCN0WLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGE,NT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES, INCLUDING THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,1-0 ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT'CHE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION. I FUR'T'HER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COAS'T'AL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. W •Wr.- ..,�.....- _ [raw-� �..e� Signature of Property Owner Q Si Lure of Property Owner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF n6jber 20 1k SARAH JOOHYUN KIM Notary Public—State of New York NO.01K16054927 / Qualified in Nassau county Notary Public W My Commission Expires Feb 12.20A 10'd Xyl lar'dasV7 dH RdTt, Z0 LT/OT/OT APP LICANT/A.GENT/REPRESEN TA'TI'VE TRANSACTIONAL DISCL0SUItb; F'0I2M The Town of Southold's Codeof Ejhjnrol ' its.cgstflicts of interest on the pa{t of town bf#Accrs and emoloYees "Ilse puspoae of this form is to provide inforination which can alert the to=of possibllc conflicts of Unterest and allow it to iake wh ALacx ever ion is necessary,to avoid same. YOURNAME: ���'S1y^e. i (Last name,Fast name,.rpiddle initial,unless you are applyins in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate tete other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee _ Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship.with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO Ifyou answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of perspn•employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or dcsc4be In the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); ' Q)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(where the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONS141P V 44 Submitted this day of�- --200— Signature - Print Name Form"I'S I �' —'---`-' APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The JQwn f 1 od o int='e a art to a t l a se this form is to-pm ide information which vM alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action Is ne_ ccssa3y to avoid same. YOUR NAME: ��. ��r f�,.n �l ,.Irl Jr (Last name,first name,.ipiddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance --------Tt usicc �---- Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map _ Planning Other (If"Other'',name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any offecr or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO lf,you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agcnt/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RFLATIONSNIf 40 Submitted this day of__�_ _ —20_ Signature Form TS 1 Print Name - w 1 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ti Name: Address: eo.vi r�+�T/nr� GOa �ou,v d �/tGo.� �r. �I7✓/T7'� rtiuc. - �9//!.� (,3o f G 13 63 2.4N��/Gol /Vi�is f�a,PrP`f F'r3•a,'4l J'acY' . 3'Ds ..�,w d �.�/�„ A'J.g-TT.r7vt/� 9y/- zZ 10,E 7r,;OI&C is, • y STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C4 , residing at o�5d x""14"'I& A" being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of oif .b-a, , 20_11 deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment rol of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at _ ,that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAEURETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to efore me this +h Day of-Nollf JMbf C,20J_L_ 3 0 A)� �otaryPublic TRACEY L. DWYER NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01 DW6306900 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,2 01 S�fFocx i Michael J.Dom in%,�''-.esident O�Q CSG Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President yam, 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sandersy P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski ?� ® p! Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of PA D FAMILY,LLC COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE residing at/dba X6'0 T004 being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the (o day of /t/c•v Pte'' 4-7 , 201'7, 1 pers nally posted the property known as by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday,November 15,2017. Dated: � / l- (signature) Sworn to before me this day off4lQ�� 017 Notary P lic , , �� %-0 TRACEY L. DWYER NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01DW6306900 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,2_ . COPT u� stal Service" Postal •CERTIFIED p ■ tERTTFIEDMAILID-RECEIPT i:a •. • L1 •, onty in ,.A IU ruI ehiAT TIS s �!1" ]�1 Ase c� •, ) I •11A TAT K 6 IL95 i< L U1 CO V,t.„7 '•a �' m Certified Mad Fee $3.30943 Irl Certified Mad Feed.�� 0945 CO $ 05 co $ f: 05 Q Extra Services&Fees(check box_add tee ( ate) l`REL Q Extra Services&Fees(check box,edd fee a �date) } ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy $ °«� r A(e (:3 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ °'�- 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �„-,�.o. ye et�� Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �I(-1�)-I Postmark Q ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ > o .f a Q C]Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Here Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ f"r� Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ -- I [3 Adult signature Restricted Delivery$ CP Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ - f a ❑ Q Postage $0.49 Q Postage •n $ 'Iii/31-A201.7 0.49 Total Fes t ^� ,`n $ 10/31/2017 Ln Ttl Postage ane M �6..�9 Uey Total Postage and Fees p fj_ .p SeJJtI- t�(U a n U s O $ireet and A L No.=or PO Box Rf ds ry , � o ------ - Q u�i�®Je�t S AQt Ado or P' B�xNpj f`- J`Ovr asOU n-- ----`---_-_ X13 r: j lti ry 5 SOUCdy, ------------------b----------` Ci ,State, P+4 � :ee r ee eee•e :ee a ee eee•e - Postal, • CERTIFIED.MAILP RECEIPT CERTIFIED © RECEIPT r •. Only rU ru &deliveiFy HA1 1TUP-K tom!kr9l, � � � � � � � .LI T�E';VE 11s 1'�Y 1 6� � ca CU M Certified Mad Fee 3.3e 0948 M Certified Mad Fee CO cc $3.35 - 0943 Q $ � 05 _ � Extra Services&Fees(check box,edd fee a ®rgq{�te) Q $ �'r El Return Receipt(hardcopy $ UU Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee ) 0 0 []Return Receipt(hardcop» $ Q E]Return Receipt(electronic) $ $0-00 Postmark E]Return Receipt(electronic) $ ' (-�(� Postmark Q E]Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ $0 00 Hera Q 0 E]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ +Rt— o - Here Q []Adult Signature Required $ 5��e t�,.]— i Q []Adult Signature Required $ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �a�'e []Adult Signature Restricted DelW ry$ TQO Total Postage and Fees Postage $0.49 (v 49 Q Postage $0.49 In $ 7 1('1/31/2017 .� In $ 10/31/2017 m $6x9 M Total Postage and Fees . 1. $ ; 3e p n S ?ti 1�!`L' - --------------------------- 0) S U �¢e.vti L L L Q S elandt.No.,or ox No. -------------- - r, 0.0 X0 d P Q Street Apt. ®,or Von 0* �o--------- _ _ ____ M1 C� °X ] b ZS d(ry tate,ZP 4�^ -C - Ci State. 4 ', I -------------------- )�/ J ty t lP i L_ . :eo e ee eee•e 1 eSN 7530-02-000;9047 i PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: ,y,"i'.l` 9 N5 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of , 20___, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAEURETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 Notary Public ,NOTICE OF HEARI- NG NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: P A D FAMILY, LLC SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING : For a Wetland Permit to construct a two-story, single family dwelling (1 ,200sq.ft. footprint) on concrete foundation with flow-through vents; construct a 250sq.ft. deck with steps to ground attached to seaward side of dwelling; and construct a 66sq.ft. front entry deck with steps to ground. Located: 530 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-99-1 -12.1 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : Wednesday, November 15, 2017 — at or about 5 :30P. M . If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town) 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION/OAF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# /®B PROJECT NAME ��/�V/Z f_S The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: —53.0 Site acreage: 2-- Present land use: y °e-e' A?N C/ Present zoning classification: /F- 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address:_ �'G�'� (c) Telephone number: Area Code( )A16 2,g-5 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No y If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation *es criteria. ❑ No �i Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 7 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria FX Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ 0 Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. F Yes F] No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable -moi h G PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeF-1 NoNot Applicable T Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No"� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No k Not Applicable ' Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 11? Tot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No KNot Applicable �a 11170" PREPARED BY /-� r c�cr TITLE ��tr-�Z DATE