The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3167~ ~illOw. Terrace Farms, Orient CA-screening around the periphery of an existing junkyard area. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGON[S. JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MA N RI3AD- STATE ROAD 25 ¢;OUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516t 765-1809 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY on THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. and as follows: 7:30 p.m. Application of HIRAM F. MOODY, JR., Oceanic Avenue, Fishers Island, NY 06390, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, for an interpretation_of Article III, Section 100-30(A) [2] (b) & (c) to allow the construction of a horse barn on vacant land containing less than 10 acres. Location of Property: Private Road, East End of Fishers Island; County Tax Map No. 1000-10-6-1.7. 7:35 p.m. Application for KATHERINE HEINS, by Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq., Front Street, Greenport, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-30 and 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for permission to re-separate two parcels having insuffi- cieDt area and/or width, located at the north side of Main Road, Orient, NY; more particularly identified as County Tax Map Parcel Nos. 1000-19-2-5 & 6. 7:40 p.m. Application for EDWIN W. STEWART, 8403 Parish Lane, Indianapolis, Indiana, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III~ Sections 100-31 and 100-34, for permission to construct addition to dwelling reducing rearyard setback, at 20 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52-2-2. 7:45 p.m. Application for JACQUELINE PENNEY, by Garrett A. Strang, Main Road, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article VII, Section 100-71 for permission to construct addition with reduction ~n sideyard setback, at prem!ses zoned "B-1 General Business" and identified as 270 North Street, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-102-5-18. 7:50 p.m. Application of EWALD M. KARBINER, 39 Edgswood Drive, New Hyde Park, NY 11040 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Page 2 Legal Notice of Hearings & Regular Meeting Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback~ at 155 Sunset Path, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-54-4-33~ :55 p.m. Application of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, W~llow Terrace, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article Xi, ~ Section 100-115 for screening around the periphery of the exiSting!~ junkyard area, at premises located at Willow Terrace Farms, con- taining approximately nine acres and particularly identified~ more j as.County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-26-2-39.9, 39.6~ 39.5~ at } ent, NY. For additional information concerning the above matters, please contact Linda Kowalski, Secretary, Zoning Board of Appeals, at 765-1809 (or 1802). Dated: September 13, 1983. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF Ai~PEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Instructions to newspapers: Please publish once, to wit: Thursday, .S.~ptember 22; 19831 and forward one affidavit of publication to: Secretary, Z.B.A., Main Road, Southold, NY 1197I~ tel. 765-1809~ by 9/27° Copies to the following on or about September Mr. Hiram F. Moody, Jr. Mrs. Katherine Heins Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq. Mr. and Mrs. Edwin W. Stewart 20th: Mr. Garrett A. Strang, for Ms. Jacqueline Penney Mr. Ewald M. Karbiner Mr. Robert J. Douglass John J. Munzel, Esq. ZBA Members Town Board Members Supervisor Town Attorney Mr. V. Lessard (Building Dept.) Town Clerk Bulletin Board TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ To ~.~..~:...~.. ~ !..~... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,:~ t. _ c4L,jthat your application dated ... ~x~, .Lt~.~'....t..~ ...... , 19 .<~.~ Location of PropertY )~,~.... J~.~' ~... ~~ .~ .... ~~. Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ...~ ....... Block ... ~ ........ Lot ~.'~.~. ~.'.~ Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds. ~.~-~..~..~... J...~7q..Z././..~. ......... .~ ~.~...r '.'.~ ~....q...~. ~~ .~. ~.~ ..~.~..~..~..~ ~...~..~.. ....~.. ~~...~. ~.~.. ~.% .¢~:'. ............... ~ ...... Building Inspector RV 1/80 A~G ~ 5 '~983 TO~N'N OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEALTI~O~[~ OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO.'-~/~/7 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Town OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ,, ~ ~.~..~4.~.~.~..~.~.:~$of ..~.l.z~....'Z.~.~.~.~_,¢..,~,~'.~ Name of Appellant Street and Number ...... ........ ................. ....... ER BY APPEL TO · . N~unicipality THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON ' "APPLICATION DATED: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ~) ( Name of Applicant for permit o~ ~u..,~,c ~.~....~.~.ee,..:..... ~/~¢¢.z,~... ...... ._...~.,..K.../.~..$; Street and Nun r~unicipality State PERMIT TO USE ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) PERMIT TO BUILD 1 LOCATION OF THE,PROPERTY ~.....~.,.,,. ,.~.~.~.~./~...~.¢~...~.~.~.,J~......, .~,..~J..$.~/~'..~.,~,~,~.,~ Street and H~ralet Zone-- ~..~..~.~..t~..¢~......~,~.~.~ ........................... o~E~ rs~.. dl'~ ~.~..,,r. /V~aD No. ' Lot No. 2 PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section. Sub~ section ana ?aragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article , Section ,~&~,/~. ,~//~'~, ~)~'~9~' D ~ F~'/~'-~ 3 TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith {or ~ A VARIANCE to the Zoning OrdinQnce or Zoning Map A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State o{ New York Town Law ChQp. 62 Cons. Laws Art ]6 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 -4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previoos appec ~ (has not) been r~ade witk respect to this aecision of the Building Inspector or with respect To this property. ~uch appeal ~ (~ request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance aqa was maae in Appeal No ................................. Dated ........................................ .. ......................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 . [ ) A Variance to the Zonir~g Ordinance ,- is requested for the reason that tee wculd like ~to Form ZB! (Continue on other side) Robert J' ~ NancY R. Dougldss ~--~ DOUg1055 / ,,WlLbO willO~ REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficuJties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because F~'~,,, ~ ~ ~ '~ ~1~ 2~ The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because ~'"~,.~ ~.. ~j,/1~, 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE C~AR^CTER OF THE DISTraCT because sT~TE OF NEW YORK; ). ~worn te this ........ :..2~. ........... day U Notary Public hgSUPREME ~'~x ~/ COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Plaintiff, -against- ROBERT J. DOUGLASS and NANCY R. WITH PREJUDICE DOUGLASS and WILLOW TERRACE FARMS, INC., STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE Index # 83-29772 Defendant. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, the Town of Southold, represented by, JAMES T. REYNOLDS, ESQ., and ROBERT J. DOUGLASS and NANCY R. DOUGLASS and WILLOW TERRACE FARMS, INC., represented by JOHN J. MUNZEL, ESQ., as follows: R. DOUGLASS shall be permitted to operate a boat yard and general heavy construction yard on the premises hereinafter described. All are to be blocked at ground level with no boats stacked. 1. That the defendants, ROBERT J. DOUGLASS and NANCY and WILLOW TERRACE FARMS, INC., their heirs and assigns, boats e poses and all purposes set forth within this stipulation are bounded The premises to be incorporated for the above pur- ~--~., and described as follows: Ail that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, being in the Town of Southold, with the improvements thereon, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the south- westerly corner of lands now or formerly of Bogan and northerly line of lands of Douglass; RUNNING THENCE along the northerly line of lands of Douglass, North 81°17'50'' West 93.45 feet to a monument at the westerly side of lands now or formerly of Brenner and thbe southerly side of lands now or formerly of Norklun and Miller; RUNNING THENCE along said lands of Brenner the following two courses and dfstances~ AVENUE · RIVERHEAO NEW YORK 11901 ~HN J. MUNZEL · ATTORNEY AT LAW · 548 ROANOKE 1. South 26°47'20" East 120 feet; and 2. North 85~57'50" East 103. 20 feet. AUi~;lN~ T~ENCE South i~38'i0" West 169.13 feet; THENCE North 88"21'50" West 116.13 feet; THENCE South 1G38'10" West 150.00 feet; TH}]NCE North 85:21'50" West 150.00 feet; THENCE South 67"30'00" West 36.47 feet; THENCE North 16"45'00" West 66.78 feet; THENCE South 71"24'30" West 7.30 feet; TH]:NCE Nortt 22~30'00# West 90.43 feet to the southerly side of private road known as Nelson Drive; RUNNING THENCE North 10"59'50" East 59.'96 feet;' THENCE North 14:48'30" West 63.29 feet; THENCE North 72~09'50" East 146.12 feet; THENCE North 26"47'20" West 114.67 feet to the sou}herly side of land now or formerly of Perkins: RE~;NING THENCE along said land of Perkins North 81"17'50" East to the land now or formerly of Bogdan; RUNNING THENCE South along land now or formerly of Bogdan Scuth 6~5i'10" East 3.48 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the defendants shall maintain the present mix of trees and privet hedge screening along the north bcundary adjacent to land now-or formerly of Perkins, Bogdan, Norkkan, Miller and Brenner. The defendants shall further plant, maintain, and replace as necessary privet hedge~ in accordance with the zoning board of appeals ruling of the 19th day of December, 1983, along the southerly 103.02 feet of the Brenner property and the 169.13 feet line lying most easterly hereinbefore described, and furtherR.Ore, adjacen~ to and continuing on the course nornh 88~2i'50~ West 116.13 feet in accordgnce with the afores'aid zoning board of appeals ruling. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that upon the entry of a final order of the Supreme Court of the State of New Y~rk and after time to appeal has expired, the defendants shall return the junk yard license heretofor issued by the Tow~ of $outhold and the owners agree that they have no right to maintain a junkyard on the premises Dated: October 10, 198~ as more fully defined in the ordinances of the Town of Southold. However, this portion of the Sti~,ulation shall no% lnpl~ge'upon the right of the ~efendants to maintain a bcatyard and a general heavy construction yard for their materials and equipment attendent thereto and as may be limited by other provisions of this stipulation. IT IS FUR~_~R STIPULATED AND AGREED that an Order may be entered without notice %0 either party incorporating the provisions of this Stipulation, an~ the instant action sh'all be dismissed without costs to either party. ~' ~ WITNESS:/~ /~ TQWN OF SOUTHOLD by W~LLOW TEREACE FAKMS, INC. ~,.. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR~ ROBERT J. DOUGLAS$ JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- -~TATE ROAD 25 ROUTHOLD. L.I., N.Y. ]]g?'l TEl FPHONE (516) 765-1809 December 21, 1983 Mr. Gerald G. Newman, Chief Planner Suffolk County Department of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 3167 - Robert J. Douglass Variance S.C.P.D. File No. SD- Dear Mr. Newman: For your records, we are enclosed herewith a copy of the decision recently rendered by the Board of Appeals, in the above matter. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, Enclosure (s) GERARD p. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Secretary ~ Southo!d Town Board of Appeals ~'~ ~°~° ~ ~°~° ~ ~°"~°~;~:~';~?:~;,'/~?~o~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI December 20, 1983 John J. Munzel, Esq. 548 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Appeal No. 3167 - variance for Screening Dear sir o~ Madam: Attached herewith is a copy of the formal findings and deter- mination recently rendered and filed this date with the Office of the Town Clerk concerning your application. In the event your application has been approved, please be sure to return to the Building Department for approval of any new construc- tion in writing, or for other documents as may be applicable. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call either our office (765-1809) or that of the building inspector (765-1802). Yours very truly, Enclosure Copy of Decision to Building Department Mr. Robert J. Douglass GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN . ~-By?Linda~F. ~owais~l Secretary SMITH, FINKELSTEIN~ LUNDBERG, CRIMMINS AND YAKABOSKI November 18, 1983 John J. Munzel, Esq. 548 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, N. Y. 11901 Re: Appeal of Douglass No. 3167 Dear ~.~. Munzel: This is to confirm our telephone conversation of this afternoon, wherein it was agreed and stipulated that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold would have an additional 30 days in which to issue and file its decision with respect to the above captioned. I would appreciate it if you and Mr. Douglass would sign the enclosed copy of this letter, and return it to me signifying your agreement. Very truly yours, FJY:mo cc.: Mr. Gerard AGREED: FRANCIS J. P. Goehringer / YAKABOSKI Robert J. Douglas~ John J. Munzel Southold Town Boa~ of Appeals -9- Nove~er 25, 1983 Special Meeting CORRESPONDENCE: Appeal No. 2914 - NORMAN C. BOOS. Correspondence was received November 3, 1983 from the office of the Town Clerk requesting an opinion from this board as to whether Mr. Boos should be permitted to construct additional floating catwalk to accommodate 18 addition small boats without additional applications to the Z.B.A. The board members confirmed and acquiesced with the Chairman's reply to the Town Clerk dated November 7, 1983, indicating that an expansion of this nonconforming marina to accommodate more than 35 boats would require additional Z.B.A. approvals, however, such proposals should be referred to the Building Department for their certification and referral accordingly. UPDATED SURVEY: Appeal No. 2803 - AGNES DUNNE. This board is in receipt of an updated survey as revised November 7, 1983 pursuant to Condition #1 of this board's May 22, 1981 decision in Appeal No. 2803. The board members noted a slight different in the square footage of both parcels by approximately 856 sq. ft. although the location of the division line is correctly shown. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to accept the November 7, in the matter of AGNES DUNNE, Appeal No. board's May 22, 1981 decision, condition 1983 survey as submitted 2803, pursuant to this #1. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doug- lass and Sawicki. Member Doyen, Fishers Island, was absent. This resolution was unanimously adopted. ,/~ .PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS. The ~ (p.ubli_c hearing on this application was held and closed on 9/29/83. ~ ~he Chairman stated that it is the recommendation of all attorneys ~ )nvol~ved that this matter be allowed a 30-day ex%ension. / / _On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was ( ~ RESOLVED, that the time period for the deliberations and ~ ~ ~end~e~ring of a decision in the matter of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Appeal/ I N°' ~.167' be requested t° extend an additi°nal 30 da~;s' ~ ~Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, and ~ ~ Sawic.ki. Member Douglass abstained. Member Doyen of Fishers Island l ~was absent. This resolution was adopted by majority vote. J PENDING INSPECTION AND DECISION: Appeals No. 3119 and 3120 - WARREN AND ELLEN HUFE. The applicants' attorney has requested a December date for the board's site and building inspection con- Southold Town Board o ppeals -10- November 1983 Special Meeting cerning these applications. The secretary was asked to notify the attorney for the applicants when an inspection date has been agreed. PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3139 ROBERT W. GILLISPIE III and others. The board members discussed the findings of their inspection last Saturday. Inasmuch as Member Doyen was not present to give his input, this matter was put over to the next meeting. UPDATE OF CHAPTER 46 - FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT LAW. On the 29th of November, 1983, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board concerning amendments to the Floodplain Management Law pur- suant to State Law. Each of the board members received a copy of the notice of public hearing outlining the proposed amendments. There were no recommendations or objections received. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal NO. 3159 - EDWIN W. STEWART. Upon application for~EDWtN W.~ STEWART, 8403 Parish Lane, Indianapo- lis, Indiana 46217, for a Variance to the Zoning~Ordinance, Article III Sections 100-31 and 100'34 for permission to construct addition to dwelling reduCing the rearyard setback, at 20 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52-2-2. The pubiic hearing on this ma~ter was held and closed on Septem- ber 29, 1983, pending reinspection and deliberations. The board made the following findings and determination: By this application, appellant seeks permission to construct a 14' by 22' addition, reducinq the rearyard setback at approxi- mately 17' from the existing bulkhead along old Cove, Arshamomaque, Southold for use as additional living area. The parcel in ques, tion contains approximately 4,050 sq. ft. building area with 20' frontage at the end of Carole Road. Existing on the premises is a one-story frame house set back 40.8' from~the westerly property line, one foot from the northerly property line, and 31' from the easterly bulkhead. The exact distance from the southerly line is not given, however, does appear to be eight feet at its nearest point from the bulkhead. It is the opinion of the board members that the addition should be in character with the homes along the east side of Carole Road, all of which appear to be set back no closer than 23 feet from the existing easterly bulkheads. Also,. it is noted for the record that this parcel and the parcels in this area are located in an "A-4" Flood Zone, which requires a minimum elevation of 8' above mean sea. level for new residential structures.. The elevation of the parcel in question is at an.average of 5.3' above Copies received from J. Reynolds Re: R. Douglass Building Dept. file: 12/31/81 - Application made for building permit for storage buildings. 1/8/82 - 8/19/82 - B.I. disapproved application pending corrected survey showing ownership. 26-02-39.2; part of 39.3 and 39.5. B.I. disapproved 12/31/81 appl. for two accessory buildings because of a determination as their being in the "frontyard" of Robert Douglass and wife. Art. III, Sec. 100-32. Also need corrected survey. Relief could be requested by way of a ZBA variance. 3/22/83 - Written notice of violation from B.I. as to three storage buildings moved without building permit. 8/83 Lease from R.J. and Nancy to Robert J. Douglass leasing part of premises for boat storage, heavy truck, machinery and boat repair (no expiration date). .495 acre - 1000-26-2-16 with building & Nancy Douglass (from Willow Terrace 1970) 3.27 acres - 1000-26-2-27.1 - Willow Terrace Farms, Inc. from R. & N. Douglas two acres in road and 1.27 in park area. Vacant land. 1.03 acre - 1000-26-2-33 and on 5/28/73. 850 34 Willow Terrace FarmS from Robert & Nancy sq. ft. house. 1.44 acre - 1000-26-2-39.1 5/28/73 willow Terrace Farms from " " " .516 acre - 1000-26-2-39.2 5/28/73 Willow Terrace from Robert & Nancy 1,500 sq. ft. barn. 9.21 acres - .595 acre - 1000-26-2-39.6 Willow Terrace from Nancy & Robert 5~28/73. with buildings ~-~- ~.~ ¥ ~,~-~'~'~ ~'~1 Robert & Nancy Douglass from R.D. Robert Douglass .435 acre. FORM NO. ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date ........... ~ .a..r...c. h....2..2. .......................... , 19...8..,3.... (owner or authorized agent of owner) ~.~.l,.,];,o,.,w.,..?.,e.~..r.,a.,c,.,e,...,L,.a,.,n,,e,.,...,O,.~ ~.,e..n,.~.,....,N.,¥......1 1 9 5 ? (address of owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance ....C. h .a..p..t...e..r.... J..0...0. ............... Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances'or Regulations ............................................ at premises hereinafter described in that .....t..h...r..e..e....!.~.!...~.~..~...r..a.~..e.....b..u...i..~..d...i..n.f~.s....~.~...v..e...d.....t.~.. (state character of violation) property--no building permz~ in violation of Art. XIV, Sect 100-14 (State section or parograph of applikable row, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or before the 5 th day of April 19 83 The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 5.9.0. .K..i. ng Street Orie~lb ~- .............................................................. ~ounty of Suffolk, New York. Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of may constitute an offense punishable by fine Qr implisonment or both. Curti3 W. Horton FORM NO, 5 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date ........ ~.~.r. ;.b~.. 2.~ ............................. , 19.8.3... (owner or authorized agent of owner) (address of owner or authorized agent of owner) 11957 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances'or Regulations ............................................ at premises hereinafter described in that storage and repairing of boats ~n a (state character of violation) A Zone not permstted in violation of Art. IIi , Sect. 100-30 (State section or paragraph of applIcable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or before the ............ ]..s..t, .................................................... day of .... .H..~, y. .................................... 19..8...3... The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 500 Kink Street~ Orient. . Count of Suffolk, New York. Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or Jmp'risonment or both. Building Inspector Curtis W. Horton FO~ NO. S TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date ..................~..a..r...c..h.....2...2 .................... , 19..8..3.... (owner or authorized agent of owner) Willow Terrace Lane Orient NY 11957 (address of owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance .... .C..i~..a...p..t..e..~... !..0..0. .............. Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances'or Regulations ..S.°...u..t..h..9..]:..d....C..9.,d...e.i.T..J..u...nkyards at premises hereinafter described in that ...?}..9....1. ,i..g..e.D..s..e....~..°.~...,~..u...n..k.~...a.~..d......5.~ T 3, i....s...t.°..~ a..g.e (state character of violation) of junk not allowed in the A Zone Art. ZII, Sect. 100-30; no fence around junkyard Art XI, Sec~ . 100-1 5 in violation of ...... .s..e...e.....a..b..o..v..e. ............................................................................................................. (State section or paragraph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or before the 5 th day of ....... .................................. The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 500 Kin~ Stree~ Orient C'n nt,, of Suffolk, New York. Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. oudding inspector -- Curtis W. Horton JAMES T. REYNOLDS PETER R CARONIA PAUL GIANELLI LAW OFFICES REYNOLDS, CARONIA & GIANELLI 8 MANOR ROAD · P.O~ BOX 617 SMITHTOWN, N.Y. 11787 (516) 265-7300 November 1, 1983 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road State Road 25 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Linda Kowalski Dear Linda: Pursuant to your request of October 31, 1983, enclosed please find signed violations regarding the Douglass matter. If you should require anything else, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours~ J~ff~ES T. REYNOLDS JTR:kat Enclosures Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI October 31, 1983 James Reynolds, Esq. Reynolds & Caronia, P.C. 8 Manor Road, P.O. Box 617 Smithtown, NY 11787 Re: Appeal No. 3167 - Robert J. Douglass Variance for Junkyard Screening Dear Mr. Reynolds: Thank you for the photocopies pertaining to the town building department file in the above matter. We will need additionally, however, copies of those documents which pertain to written violations of the so-called "junkyard" or "boatyard". The copies that were sent to us were not signed and did not appear to be prepared in the official form, but was given a date of March 22, 1983. If there are any other written orders to remedy violations, etc. since that time, we would appreciate copies of those also. Thank you again for your time and assistance. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Secretary Enclosures Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 5OUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 Pursuant to Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, New York, hereby refers the following to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: XX Variance from the Zoning Code, Article XI , Section 100-115 Variance from Determination of Southold Town Building Inspector ~ Special Exception, Article , Section -- Special Permit Appeal No.: 3167 Applicant: ROBERT J. DOUGLASS Location of Affected Land: Willow Terrace near King Street, Orient County Tax Map Item No.: 1000-26-2-39.2, 39.3 and part of 39.6. Within 500 feet of: __ Town or Village Boundary Line XX Body of Water (Bay, Sound or Estuary) (bay) __ State or County Road, Parkway, Highway, Thruway __ Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federally- Owned Land __ Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federal Park or Other Recreation Area __ Existing or Proposed Right-of-Way of Any Stream or Drainage Channel Owned by the County or for Which The County Has Estab- lished Channel Lines, or Within One Mile of a Nuclear Power Plant __Within One Mile of An Airport. COMMENTS: Applicant is requesting ~x~x Variance for screening around periphery of existinq junkyard, as required by Section 100-115. Public Hearinq was held on 9/29/83 and copies are enclosed. Copies of Town file review. and related documents enclosed herewith for ~our 1983. Secretary, Board of Appeals Dated: October 11, _ CONCLUSIONS 1. Six Foot Fence will not cover present illegal boat yard on property. 2. Six Foot Fence will only partially cover the accumulation of 'Junk" presently on property. 3. Granting of a permit to erect a six foot fence will give legitimacy to activities which the tOWn has already designated as illegal and improper on this property. ~uthold Town Board of Appeals -9- September 29, 1983 Regular Meeting RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING: The meeting was reconvened at 8:17 o'clock p.m., after motion was made by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, and duly carried to reconvene. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 3167. Application of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Willow Terrace, Orient, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-115 for screening around the periphery of the existing junkyard, at premises located at Willow Terrace Farms, containing approximately nine acres and more parti- cularly identified as County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-26-2-39.9, 39.6, 39.5, at Orient, NY. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:17 o'clock p.m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application. ~_ Member Douglass abstained and did not sit among the board members at the dais. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a copy of a survey from Young and Young dated August 3, 1983, indicating the junkyard area and pencilled-in in yellow and read are the areas of the proposed screening, except for 150' by approximately 100+- foot area in back of the barn. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this property and the surrounding properties in the area. Would somebody like to be heard in behalf of this application? JOHN MUNZEL: Good evening. John Munzel, representing the Douglasses. I believe the application this evening is simply for the privet hedging and not necessarily for the nonconforming use which we're prepared to address both. The property has been used as a boat-storage facility and as a storage facility rather than a junkyard. To me a junkyard, and I think it's defined as such is generally where you sell goods back and forth from chemicalizing things that have been destroyed. That is not the operatio~ here. The operation here has always been a storage yard and it has been used internally as the trucking and marine businesses operated by the Douglasses. Nonetheless, the property is presently substantially surrounded by screening, fencing or privet hedges, and the applica- tion is primarily for a privet heding along the easterly portion of the property, thereby screening the operation from anybody who could see it--although the distances to the nearest houses are quite sub- stantial. When I'm saying distances to nearest houses, I'm talking about those houses that might face the unscreened portion of the premises. The privet hedging, I think, would be in conformity with what already exists on the northerly portion of the property in particular where that is pretty much the case, and it has also the further advantage that screening of fencing material that becomes broken, which it usually does for some means after six months, looks terrible. At least privet hedging gives you some natural background and also S~uthold Town Board of Appeals -10- September 29, 1983 Regular Meeting (Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, continued:) MR. MUNZEL continued: gives the desired screening required or, desired screening, period. I have some photographs that indicate some of the areas in ques- tion that would be protected by the screening and showing houses, or at least one house off in the distance, probably a distance of about 200 or 300 feet to the nearest house. And then I don't believe there are any other houses that can see the property at the present time, other than those houses that have been existing right on the north for a considerable period of time. In addition, the property has been subdivided as you're well aware, and the lots which required the screening have--are in different ownerships, although as a practical matter it's all in control of the Douglass Family. We have executed a lease from all property owners to Robert J. Douglass for the operation of the storage facility and the boatyard facility so that it is not in a unity of ownership. I believe the board also has a number of letters, am I correct, on that? MR. CHAIRMAN: I believe so. MR. MUNZEL: Ok. The board also has a number of letters also from the Douglasses explaining their position from A. Ross Norklun, Mr. Gerrity, Pat Perkins, Mr. Bogden, Carl King, Mr. Hands, Dave Perkins, and I believe that completes it. There are a number of persons here who are familiar with the premises and who have lived there for many, many years, and can testify if you so desire. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Munzel. Is there anybody else that would like to be heard in behalf of this application? Kindly state your name, Sir? JOHN KENNEDY: My name is John Kennedy, and I live on Willow Terrace Road, and I have no objection whatsoever to the planting of any kind of privet barrier or hedge on that property. I live on the southwest bordering hedge. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Anybody else like to be heard in behalf of this application? Sir? DAVE PERKINS: My name is Dave Perkins and we have been friends and neighbors of the Douglasses for at least 23 years, and my property has adjoined his for the last 23, and I see no reason not to grant the privet hedge. I think it would be very nice and it would look very nice. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: application? Thank you. Anybody else in behalf of the CARL KING: I am Carl King of Orient. I'm a neighbor of the Douglasses and my property is away from them but we're very Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- September 29, 1983 Regular Meeting (Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, continued:) MR. KING continued: close neighbors. I have lived there on King Street for the last 69 years and I had worked with Bob's father years back on the farm, and to me, I think it's a great idea to screen it. But I'll say one thing about the junkyard-- so-called "junkyard." It doesn't make any noise, but we have plenty of other noises in the immediate area which we would like to see done away with. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. King. Would anybody like to speak against the application? Sir? BURKE LIBURT: My name is Burke Liburt and I'm a neighbor. I would like to speak in opposition to this application. I have three Exhibits which I would like to show the board. Can I approach the board? MR. CHAIRMAN: Surely. MR. LIBURT: Thank you. I'm not sure what the best way of showing these is. I'll give these to you one at a time. The purpose of these exhibits-- MR. CHAIRMAN: Do you want to address that exhibit? you turn that around. Would MR. LIBURT: Thank you. First, the purpose of these exhibits is simply to point to the effect of a fence, privet, wood or otherwise. I take it the purpose of the fence is to cover the present usage, which is as a boatyard, most recently, and an accummulation of various materials which we call junk. This simply shows what a boat in storage looks like. This is a schematic. It's not to scale. A 30-plus sailboat, and I assure you that there are a number of those which are easily visible. It is elevated over a 6-foot fence, at least five to six feet. Common sense can tell you how that happens from the depth fo the boat to the distance from the cradle--deck to the water line and cabin. I think we're all familiar with that. If it's a cabin cruiser, the same equation applies. What we have on the east elevation, the one which we certainly see from our house, we may be 200 feet or 300 feet or 400 feet from the house, and I assure you that we see everything. So the dis- tance, it's across a flat field. We can make out with the naked eye virtually every piece of significant junk. This was done by my ad agency. This shows one boat--if you will it's a cartoon. Obviously there are a number of boats which are visible from the east elevation, all elevated to a heigth of~ 15 feet, 18 feet, the Lord knows how much higher. The point here is that the fence, the erection of a fence, while seemingly ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -12- September 29, (Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, continued:) MR. LIBURT continued: allowable will not do anything to cover this major boatyard and maintenance facility, which is smack in the middle of a residen- tial area. So I'll give these charts to you by the way as part of the record. 1983 Regular Meeting (Three exhibits were submitted for the record as follows: (1) large diagram of the back of a sailboat with supports raised above the ground; (2) large boat with cabin and raised crane along side stockade fencing; (3) list of "conclusions".) MR. LIBURT: These are simply conclusions. You probably can't read them from here. The point is, one, a six-foot fence won't cover the present illegal boatyard on the property. I will address that. The six-foot fence will only partially cover the accummula- tion of junk which is presently on the property. And I think the ~ important thing here and the core of this whole business is that a granting of a permit to erect a six-foot fence--I was under the impression it was a wooden fence. Apparently it's a privet fence, which grows very slowly I might add, will give legitimacy to activity which the town has already designated as illegal and improper use of this property. The town as you know has appointed ~ special prosecutor, or rather the district attorney has appointed-- they have designated--and their intent is to prosecute Mr. Douglass on these grounds. It is a moot point at best that the boatyard is nonconforming use. It is certainly a moot point that it is nonconforming use for a junkyard. And I think that is really the core issue. Certainly, a privet hedge 8 to 10 feet high--we have a house which is 250 years old and we have a privet hedge at some point which is 12 feet high, is certainly attractive, but that is not the issue. If the permit is granted, it seems to me and I believe to other people who are in the area--that the boat will be taking attack in total contradiction to that which the town is now pursuing by allowing maybe possible that this is noncon- forming use, but the statement that it's nonconforming use thus far has been unsubstantiated by any facts to my knowledge. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Liburt. Let me see if there is anybody else, Mr. Munzel. Is there anybody else that would like to object to this particular application? (No one). Mr. Munzel? MR. MUNZEL: It is my understanding that the application is for the "junkyard" presently pending and no decision is going to be made until this board makes a determination apparently in regard to fencing. Secondly, it's a-- I think that the documents this board--being the letters that have been submitted; some affidavits--clearly indicate that this operation has been going on for years and years and years, long prior to zoning. In ~ addition thereto, Mr. Liburt's sketches are predicated primarily on a 6-foot fence, and basically we really have no great argument with Liburt in terms of the liabilities of the 6-foot fence in S~uthold Town Board of Appeals -13- September 29, 1983 Regular Meeting (Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, continued:) MR. MUNZEL continued: terms of screening. That was precisely why we are seeking a privet hedge. We seek to effectively screen the entire parcel. I will take exception to the slow-growing privet hedging. .I think they grow pretty quickly. They don't grow as quickly as a six-foot fence grows, but nonetheless, they grow and they are far more effective in screening the boats and the other material that may be on the site. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, Mr. Liburt. MR. LIBURT: May I respond to that? MR. CHAIRMAN: Surely. MR. LIBURT: It is my understanding after discussion with th~ Supervisor's Office this morning, and my own counsel who I have retained, (names unclear - Ocean, Packerman and Black [?]), I believe, that the pursuit or the special prosecutor's prosecution, if you will, or following Mr. Douglass has absolutely nothing to do with any decision on a privet hedge or a fence of any sort. I'm not an attorney, but one of us is mistaken--the Lord knows Which one. I don't think either of us can give expert opinion on a privet hedge, but a privet hedge certainly does not come 6' high--so let me just talk to you on a basic thing. I live across from the Douglass property, and I will tell you under the strongest possible terms that the dump in Southold is nirvana compared to this property and I would like to you to come to my house from any angle and you can see it. I mean no indictment to Mr. Douglass and his family and they're fine people without question, but I think that we have to face facts as they are visible. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Liburt. Did you have anything to say in response to that, Mr. Munzel? (No response.) MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there any comment from anyone in the audience either pro or con? (None) Is everyone familiar where this privet hedge is supposed to be planted? Is everybody familiar with that? (no reply.) Any questions from any board members concerning this hearing? (None). Is there anything you would like to say, Mr. Lessard, in reference to what Mr. Liburt had to say? MR. LESSARD (BUILDING DEPT.): Only that the application is for a junkyard per se. It has nothing to do with the boat area. He has applied for a fence of some type around the junkyard accord- ingly to the law. We're discussing again, "junkyard"; and the law says that a junkyard requires a fence or screening of some type-- and I believe that is what Mr. Douglass has applied for. That . doesn't necessarily mean that this area encompasses that area thlt has the boat in it. The area that the board wishes to designate as that area to be screened is your jurisdiction. I can't tell Eouthold Town Board of Appeals -14- September 29, (Appeal No. 3167 - ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, continued:) MR. LESSARD, BUILDING DEPT., continued: you how big or small to make it, if you so desire, but so we don't get too far afield, Mr. Douglass is applying accordingly to the law. The law says that the Board of Appeals must designate that type of screening to encompass what he has applied for, so that we don't get out of proportion on this. 1983 Regular Meeting MR. CHAIRMAN: Mr. Munzel? Thank you, Mr. Lessard. MR. MUNZEL: Mr. Douglass just reminded me that he already has I think well over 200' of privet hedging that is fairly full- grown and ready to plant, so as we have the approval of the board. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Are there any further con~ments from anyone in the audience concerning this application? (None) Hearing no further comment, I'll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision until later, on the condition, Mr. Liburt, that the next time we are out on inspections we will stop by your property and view the Douglass site from your property which we could just as well done, but we did ride by your house but didn't stop. And before this board renders a decision, we will ~stop by. MR. LIBURT: Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: You're very welcome. MEMBER SAWICKI: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the matter of Appeal No. 3167, application of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, pending reinspection fo the areas in question and surrounding parcel in the immediate area. Vote of the Board: Ayes: and Sawicki. (Member Douglass duly adopted. Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis ~ abstained.) This resolution was / oavicl G. ~ patri¢ia ?¢rkin$ ..~ t?aoert d' Catherine Bogde ~.6~i'I0"~. $.48 curtis A. Norklun Nancy E. Miller Willow /Terrace Farms, Inc. ~. Robert d Douglass N, 88~ RoDer! O. ~ ~ne.~ ~ren~ N. 88o57'50"£. 105.20 ' AUTO ."~ame of App]ica:~t, Ludividual Corporation or Partnership I am und~r 2! ye~u~s of age Yes No x I am a citizen of the Imzt~d States Yes x No Convicted of Felony or l,fisdemeanor Yes No x Nmz~ber of ~mr;,io 'ecs to be _ ... }. ~. en~aged Name and Address of owner of lands Robert J~ Douglass and nature of the right of occupancy, of the applicant to 'the use of such Willow Terrace Lane, P.O. Box 77~ land. O~j:~_z New York 11957 Appl.~.an~ 'm~,st ffle _m~p or plan of real property upon which busihess is to be conducted with the fo]lowing infformation: i. Location of fence required~ 2. Location of buildings. 3. Location of streets and highways. 4. Location of water add ~as mains. I hereby certify 'that all the above information is true to the best of my knowledge and belief arid that ! will conduct the business pursuant to the re£~ulations set forth ~.n the C~dinance Licensin~ and RegulatinE Secondhand, Junk and Auto Parts Activities and Businesses. Sworn to before me tiffs 1983 11957 Hall 11971 Deaz '~irs: as an by or Storage~nd firm th~ use of Robert J. ~ since April of 1948, Inc., Orient Marine YeS Robert J. and present uses taking ~ollows: and over the road hauling of ~r'of al~ such Over t] ~e r~ad equip 3types, from house building, road bu%iding, dock and dredging~on land or sea. and repairs of ~ both motor and sail. with the a- fTiends who have have usually from and Construction [ly. The boats of (15) to (~30) depending on an yards and made All these ow~ con- has alway~ been kept not'~changed in great almos~ any new.price of equip- of;road ma- *s when ~ to. present when we work 7, We "-? used": or 8, The If i~ is de, ce d, to screen' used. ~r purch& e permit'~ ~: Mr. Up Thank you Respectfully ROber~ J. Nanc~R~ have our old machinery or on this property to be We have never purchased type material only kept our )air s~ply. about 75 percent 12 foot 'All our non King ~tween us and .~0~ viSi] :rom town roads. by yo~building, dept,, we will pro- ours from. the rest of our lands <Wehav~ade arrangement to and. will do so as weather and finances surveying, posting and writing of ~1~1~ non conformin~ commercial areas. cooperation. Am SWorn To ,,ed Willow Terrace Lane Orient, New York 11937 March 23, 1983 Honorable WLl~Len R, pall Super~lor Town of ~outhold $outhold, New York ~1~971 Dear SupervLoor Pe:l~ I om vritLu~ to You as & 'neifhhor and md;Jaoent property o~ner of Robe~ Jo DOU&IAao, of ¥111oe Terrace, Orient, New York and Ln Althoush ! have only boon · property ounor Ln OrLent a~nco Novenber, 1978. l have been· v~o%tor to our Conm~ty o~ce 1962. DurLn~ that t~me ! have been ay·re o£ Hr, Douslaoa conduoMl~ a h~vy oon~truotion and boat otoruse Business on preUELllO, Bo:till ~ull iv·ri or hie ]~nd uso, T d~d I~ot feel ~o · deter~ont and oonstructed my homo ·d3acent to l~to property. ! om a riru auppoz'ter of Zonl~S and en~oroonent of Zontn~ Codes. ! must, hovovoz', mlpport those taxpayers vhoo® propert7 az~ · Non-Conforu~u~ uso. X con not ·~ree vith those who fool Hr. Dous~ao Ls c0nduotinf · ";Junk ~rd", The machinery, leh~h 1. have observed, o~ l~ts propert~ :ii used to the best of my knovled~e and bslLef for the malAtenunoe and repair of hie t~oks, crones, equipment, r4r. Dou~oms. March 12, 1983 Orient, NY 11957 Sou~hold Tow~,BuildingDept. C/QC~rtis Hor,ton, InSpector R0qtel 25, S°~hold NY,.' i1971 To Whom It May ~ This is done as a form of an affidsv~u to,~firm the,use of Robert and Nancy Douglass properties since Bobs return from World War II. w~rked as a ne : J. Douglass · ~an~ tion Co. have on his lands as he In ~ father was alive he even fa~ed with at the same time. -".' AS a neighbor Bob'~ (Robert Jo Douglass) has often helped me OU~ and I (Michael Bogden). have done what I could do for We have never had a closed fence between us and we hope you wi~I not force"this now. ' The b~,~l~ess activity of our neighbor Robert Douglass haan;not int~grferred With any of our living %n the neighbor- hog~d,.~and o~fers no thZ~at to anyone as it is. The business ~,~!l.hx~den, from K~g. Street,. and totally fronts on I Ro~rt and~NaDcy DouglaSs-own land. My wife and I hope y6ul~ will leave ~t'~as it h~M been since before zoning to the present. Michael Bogden March 12, 1§83 Orient, NY 11957 SouthoId ToWn Building Dept~ c/o~curtis Horton Inspector, southold Town Hall To .:~ml' It May~q~oncern? :!ii (David Perkins) write thi, as to aflrm the Present and past use of property. a form of an affidavit Robert and Nancy Douglass ,,My wife Patricia and.myself have been rear yard neighbors sin~ we Came ~o Orient, in the past, Robert J. Douglass built and sold our house to us. We have never had a~1¥ trouble with the Douglass operations which began before ~onin~and h~s.continued 4o present day on the same land~i and in the~ same ~ness field as it started. ~t has always' had used Parts around for repairing machines, alwaY~ stored~ats toi~°~'on ~nd always stored road materials' and ~other materials for, heavy, construction. we have never had a fence between us and always helped each'other as we could. It is hard for us to understand why ali of a sudden you find ~t necessary to cause disruption of our neighborhood, we have always lived in harmony, and desire to do so now. We have no desire for a change to ~cked you of us as presure from people who just moved in,~ They kno~ is here when they buy their land or house. Yours truly, David Perkins Patricia Perkins March 19, 1983 Orient, N.Y. 11957 Dear S~r. (To Whom It MaY' Concern) ~his paper is writ~gn: by me (Tony Norklun), as a form of an aSfldav~ t. ., ~? af~ rm~.~_.~ the ~e., of the propert~s. ~uglgss~ andj~a~cy R~ ~glass, P!~s their needed services as a, ~-confO~ng business since~i948, and earlier. ~ lived'od property ~hat backs up to theirs, but hav( ~no~'~them and;.~d work ~done ~ them, their company, Orient Truckfhg, and~ ~tructioh .C61 Inc.~ .and f~ily years ~fore I moved to ~esent ~idence.. -~R0~rt, N~ and ~he!r f~il~ have always operated busioess tha~.~olved hea~ const~ction of all types, ~at ;~andling 'a~d: repairs, highwa~3~work a~d even fabrication of p~tS or ma~h~hes. . all po~ee~e~ to many I in it expense., hav~never out'bell, your I've known them they.have always t~ ~erform. there business and shops ntain the equipment and boats they work on. ha~e~always~,h~andled stored and repaired boat~;for, friends from f%fteen (15) to as It g~eS withou~ saying' that as long as owned boats of all sizes and descriptions, ha,s done our boat work and always will. checki~ you wl~l~: find tha~ most all of Screen~ from~the~ neighbora and King Street. a.thousand (~000) feet from any always! had old ~achinery saved knowl'edg~ the¥.'ha~e never been Unk and I therefore can not thei=~equ~ent etc. is a junk many times at their o%rn ha~e~ no fO~ ' their business, Please take, aS they ,always have in ~arc~'i: 10. ~83 Orient. NY 11957 world the use of e.,t~e day after Carl H~','~i, nga neighbor of. Robert and',Nancy Doug/az:' who~3~and tba~'%~'O~: ~'~ ha~'~know' them .,all the~i~ ] ive~ 0B~ ~"~ ~,~J~o~e~ions ,~i,ce they started. and~h~ of t~'¢.'comp~fi~},?Orie~¢ '~ucking,'~nd Constructio:~ The, busi busings" ;',,Robert o h~ with k~he wise. all operations c an}' if they did~'t ~' their shop. ~heir family and company business %g of ~ats of al! ct D ~uglass even ~r boats, in t~(~ ,~' land). The number f~m 10'tO 30 or more ;do on ~th~ ~ey have '~Y s0ns;/boats and sti]~ :ials · of my junk ~is kept for repair so~e no problems a~d aS it ex].sts any ~ow~ road an no~ ~reened by trees, hedge ~ overlooks.~their farm ~ve thin~ as they are. Re , , .52-4715402 ,'; '" ' Qualified in Suffolk County .iO0~, ssion Exp{res M.~oh ~e, 19~: P thi~ $ - r~ March 18, 1983 Orient, N.Y. 11957 Town Supervisor ~1971 ~ $irst to: voice my disapproval Depar tme~t ?1 s. and 'their had recently moved~ in ye wish ~o~SUl~or~'~the.businees, operation where li~evtlme it has always been ~ll know it, and ,s.been the same as ~hey pro kno~i~a~ a fact ~n our have ~lped father and you own pockets at so for many a DouglaSS! has not only wgrked with but the Ope~ationof~heaVy~struction machi~e~i ~,!Our, teens. M°$t~of, mY~enerati°~ for Bob and. learned things us in Iives, earning capacity in later his~companies~ o~ b~siness have as Th~ Orien~.:wharf for years the ~ommunSty peopl~ had s He'h$~ taken ~are of any )le over the years, includinc DOUgh&SS, has never of any-kind, that I know they most needed it.~ It lsm~;~,beleife ~.~ ~o~ and your department should ' change~our ~ressures,'~'~'~one of S~pport ~a~her than dis- ~ ruPt~Oh$' of ,aW~'ll ope~$~q'10ca! ~siness~ ~hat has existed -it~ ~esent lands from ev~,,,~efore~',~948, ~eing the same type of,~w0~k as i,el!s now. im~act alr~st all ~,ts neighbors mo' bit (2) · and ~ is so well buried behind n%ng that you would hardly know it value to give a little ation may-be even A..~RgssNo~klun NOTICE IS B]gI~SY GIVEN, purou~at to ~iim~ 267 of ~ Town LltW. alM~ th~ a Regular Meetia~ and the following public be held by the ~nathold-Tow, Zoning Board of Al~ueis at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY on THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. and as foUov~: 7:30 p.m. HIRAM F, Oceanic Avenue, Island, NY Variance to tl~ zoniag Ordinaue~, fm~ an interpretoUoa M Articin III, raining less than 10 acrN. Location of Prol~rty: Pri- vate Road, East End of Fishers Island; County Tax Map No. 1000-10-6-I.?. 7:35 p.m. ApPlication for KA?RERIN~ HEIN$. by Frederick J. 'l~l~l, ~., Front Street, Gre~nport, for a Variance to thc Zoning Ordinance Article IIL $~- tions 100-~ &nd 100-31, ~nlk ~cbedula, for prrml~ion to r~- separate two parcels having insufficient area ond/oc.'~ width, located at the north ~ide of Main Road, Ort~lt, NY; more purtieutoriy identified as County Tax Map Parcel N~. 1000-19-2-5 & 6. ?:40 p.m. Application for EDWIN W. STEWART, ~403 Parish Lane, Indianapolis, Indiana, for a Variance to the Section~ 100-31 and 100-34, fas permission to eonstruc~.~ addition to dwelling reducing ten,yard ~etback, at ~0 Carols Road, $outhold, Tax Map Parcoi ?:~$ p.m. Application for JACQUELINE PENNEY. by Garreit A. Strang, Main ~d, Southold~ NY for a Vartanc~ to the Zoning Ordinance, ArQele VII, Section 100-71 for permission to construct addition with rednctiou in sideyard ~thaek, at zoned "B-1 Genoral and identified as 270 No,th $treeL Cutchogue, County Tax Map Parcel No~ .1000-102-5-13. 7:$0 p.m. Application of~ EWALD M. KARBINER, 39 Edgewood Drive~ Now Hyde Park~ NY 11040 for n Varian~ to the Zoning Ordtoa~ca~ Article IIL ~tioa 100.~1 for permission to constrnct tion to dwei~in~ wi~h ficient frost, oral s~l~ck, at 1~$ Snnsat Pet~ zoUthold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1~o0w.~1~$$ p.m. Application of~ ~T J. ~OUG~.~qS, ow Terrace, Ori~t, Variance to the 2onin$ Ordinance, ,~a'~ele XI, 100-115 for sc~n~ng nround the periphory o! junkyard area, at premises located at Willmv Terrace.T Farms, containing approa- ima~ly nine acr~m p~arttoularly ident~ ~ount~ Tax Map Paveml~ No. For addiUnaal ~tlm- please contact Linda Kowaiski, Secretary, Zoning Board of Appeals, at 765-1809 (or 1~). Dated: Septemb~ 13, lin. BY ORDER OF BOARD OF APPEALS GEP~ P. GOEItRINC~ JOAN H. MAGEE HOIARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK HO. 52-4505858 QU,~[It:tiD IH SUFFOLK 60Ul¢1¥ ,.¢ COMM!%!ON EXPIRES MARCH 30, 19Y4 STATEOFNEWYORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Joan W. Gustavson of Greenport, in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published et Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk end Stats of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed ia a printed copy, has been regularly published In enid Newspaper once each week for weeks auccn~ivniy, commencing on theP,~nc]. dnyof September 19 83 Principal Clerk Sworn to b~ this. day of __. · t/ the Town Law and the Provi- sions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, N.Y. on THURS- DAY, SEPTEMBER 29. 1983 commencing at 7:30 'o'clock p.m. and as follows: 7:30 p.m. Application of HIRAM F. MOODY, JR., Oceanic Avenue, Fishers Is- land, N.Y. 06390, for a Var- lance to the Zoning Ordinance, for an interpretation of Article' II1, Section 100-30(A)[2] (b) & (c) to allow the construction of a horse barn on vacant land containing less than 10 acres. Location of Property: Private Road, East End of Fishers Island; County Tax Map No. 1000-10-6-1.7. 7:35 p.m. Application for KATHERINE HEINS, by Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq., Front Street, Greenport, N.Y. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 111, Sec- tions 100-30 and 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for permission to re- separate two parcels having insufficient area and/or width, located at the north side of Main Road, Orient, N.y.; more particularly identified as County Tax Map Parcel Nos. 1000-19-2-5 & 6. 7:40 p.m. Application for EDWIN W. STEWART, 8403 Parish Lane, Indianapolis, In- diana, for a Variance to.the Zoning Ordinance, Article IlL Sections 100-31 and 100-34. for permission to construct addi- tion to dwelling reducing rear- yard setback, at 20 Carole Road, Southold, N.Y.; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52- :2-2. :~ ~ 7:45 p.m. Application for JACQUELINE PENNEY. by Garrett A. Strang. Main Road, Southold, N.Y. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Artlclc VII, Section 100-71 for . permission to construct addi- tiaa with reduction in sideyard setback, at premises zoned "B-I General Business" and identified as 270 North Street. Cutchogue, N.Y.; Comty Tax .Map Parcel No. 1000-102-5- 18. ~'~" ~ : 7:50 p.m. Application of EWALD M. KARBINER, 39 Edgewood Drive, New Hyde Park. N.Y. 11040 for a Var- iance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 111, Section 100-31 for permission to construc~ addi- tion to dwelling with an insuf- ficient frontyard setback, at 155 Sunset Path, Southold, N.Y.; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-54-4-33 7:55 p.m. Application of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Wi!- low Terrace, Orient, N.Y. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Article Xl, Section 100- 115 for screening around the periphery of'the existing junk- yard area, at premises located at Willow Terrace Farms, containing approximately nine acres and more particularly identified as County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-26-2-39.9, 39.6, 39.5, at Orient, N.Y. For additional information concerning the above matters, Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, soys that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- / man once each week for ........................................ weeks successively, commencing on the day ................ Sworn to before me this ............... ..~...~ .......... day of ...... ~~ ............ , 19... ~.~ L APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 S0UTHOLD, L.[., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY on THURSDAY,~_S~PTEMBER 29, 19~_8~commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. and as follows: 7:30 p.m. Application of HIRAM F. MOODY, JR., Oceanic Avenue, Fishers Island, NY 06390, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, for an interpretation of Article III, Section 100-30(A) [2] (b) & (c) to allow the construction of a horse barn on vacant land containing less than 10 acres. Location of Property: Private Road, East End of Fishers Island; County Tax Map No. 1000-10-6-1.7. 7:35 p.m. Application for KATHERINE HEINS, by Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq., Front Street, Greenport, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-30 and 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for permission to re-separate two parcels havin~ insuffi- cient area and/or width, located at the north side of Main Road, Orient, NY; more particularly identified as County Tax Map Parcel Nos. 1000-19-2-5 & 6. 7:40 p.m. Application for EDWIN W. STEWART, 8403 Parish Lane, Indianapolis, Indiana, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sections 100-31 and 100-34, for permission to construct addition to dwelling reducing rearyard setback, at 20 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52-2-2. 7:45 p.m. Application for JACQUELINE PENNEY, by Garrett A. Strang, Main Road, Southotd, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article VII, Section 100-71 for permission to construct addition with reduction in sideyard setback, at premises zoned "B-1 General Business" and identified as 270 North Street, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-102-5-18. 7:50 p.m. Application of EWALD M. KARBINER, 39 Edgewood Drive, New Hyde Park, NY 11040 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Page 2 Legal Notice of Hearings & Regular Meeting Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback, at 155 Sunset Path, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-54-4-33. 7:55 p.m. Application of ROBERT J. DOUGLASS, Willow Terrace, Orient, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-115 for screening around the periphery of the existing junkyard area, at premises located at Willow Terrace Farms, con- taining approximately nine acres and more particularly identified as County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-26-2-39.9, 39.6, 39.5, at Orient, NY. For additional information concerning the above matters, please contact Linda Kowalski, Secretary, Zoning Board of Appeals, at 765-1809 (or 1802). Dated: September 13, 1983. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Instructions to newspapers: Please publish once, to wit: Thursday, September 22, 1983, and forward one affidavit of publication to: Secretary, Z.B.A., Main Road, Southold, NY 11971; tel. 765-1809, by 9/27. Copies to the following on or about September 20th: Mr. Hiram F. Moody, Jr. Mrs. Katherine Heins Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq. Mr. and Mrs. Edwin W. Stewart Mr. Garrett A. Strang, for Ms. Jacqueline Penney Mr. Ewald M. Karbiner Mr. Robert J. Douglass John J. Munzel, Esq. ZBA Members Town Board Members Supervisor Town Attorney Mr. V. Lessard (Building Dept.) Town Clerk Bulletin Board JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 August 25, 1983 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3167 application of Robert J. Douglas; for a variance. Also included is notification to adjacent property owners; Short Environmental Assessment Form; Letter relative to N.Y.S. Tidal Wetlands Land-Use; and survey. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk R~EIVED AUG 2 5 1983 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NI~V YORK OF BU.D,NG APPEAL NO. ~/g 7 DATE ....~/.. 2.0~..~.3. ......... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (We) .....~,Qk~r.t .. J. ,... ~g ~.~ .s..s.. ................. of ...... .W. ~..~. ~ .°...w....?..e...~.~.a...C~... ~..a"~' .e.. ....................... Nome of Appellant Street and Number ...Oriemt.,..~7/. ....................................................................... 119.~.1.. ....... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality ~1~ THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: FOR: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO (X) ( ) ....... R~. r.t J~., :,~..~gl~.~. .............................. Name of Applicant for permit of ...... W~ l~.w...~.~.r.~ .e..e.. ......... O.~.i.e.~.~. ,....k~qC.....%..z..9...5. 7. ........................................ Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) PERMIT TO BUILD LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY Rri¥.a..~..e, .R..qa..d.. ....... .O..r...i..e...n_t.., .NY. 1195.7. .................... Street and Hsmlet ~ne .............. D~s.cribe.d..~an.d ................................. OWNER (S): .gP~. J...DQR~%$~D. .... Mop No. Lot No. DATE PURCHASED: . .19.~ .............. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article , Section Building Dept. Decisions 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith 1'or (×) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal ~ (X) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ( ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for Special licenses and screening is requested for the reoson thor we would like to Licensed ordered by Building Dept. OeEc on ncAa-conforming business Porto zB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficultiesorunneces- sory HARDSHIP because Force me to court to win my non-conforming rights witch have been in operation many years before zoning, building dept. had this dry record by affidatis from all neighbors. 2. The hardshipcreatedis UNIQUEand isnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because There are no other legal non conforming business in this area (illegal yes). 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because Business operation has been in existamce long before zoning and doing the ~ame work surounded by the same neighbors. COUNTY O~i Sworn to this ........... 4:~.~ ...... day of...~,......~: .... 19 Notary Public ~ 52-8]25860. Suffolk Tee~ ~ires March ~, BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southoid TO: NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (~l~:~qe [circle cho±ce] Junk yard license and ~reeninq for non conformina business, ). 2. Thattheproperty whichisthesubjectofthePetitionislocatedadjacenttoyourpropertyandisdes. cribedasfollows: Property used since before 1947 for heavy construction - boat storaqe and repair - farminq base and the keepinq of old maehlnery etc. for Darts in our work, 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4. ThatbysuchPetition, theundersigned willrequestthefollowingrelief: Issuance of junk yard permit ordered , qotten by building Dept. and o.k. to screen area with privit headqe as part is already. 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article Section 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you ma), then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1809. Already done. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: Petitioner Post Office Addr~s Box 773 Orient N.Y. 11957 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS NAME ADDRESS STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) SS.: Robert J. Doualass , residing at willow Terrace Orient, NY 1~957 , being duly sworn, deposes and says that onthe day of ,19 __, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice at Orient. 5Pr ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. Sworn to before me this day of ,19 Notary Public BOARD OF.. APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold (Variance) reque~st a (SpeciaJ~cep~,On) (Special PermJt)Z~'~ [circle choice] 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: ' -- ~ -- --_ ' 3. lhat the property which is the su such PetitioJl,~ located in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: ~ ('~ 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are ~Lc~e ~ 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated ~P°st Office Address P 232 268 863 RECEIPT P~R'~ERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) P.~ r STATE ~F~ CODE CERTIFIED FEE SPECIAL DELIVERY ELIVERY SHOW 70 WHOM AND ¢ ¢ P 232 2.68 859 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO iNSURANCE COVERAGE PROVtDER~ NOT FOR iNTERNATIONAL MAIL (See ? 232 2 8 862 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDEG-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) 'LT POSTMASTER FOR FEES ~ 9'~ ID .om SE.V,CES STAT[ OF NEW Y O [ [ } I 1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) ss.: oreSidingat I~/~ ~#)~ 7~jl~, being duly sworn,'deposes and says'tha~-o~ tl~e~ day nent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on'the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current a~essment roll of the Town of Soutbold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- rice__q.L_ ~_.~?.~J~_~.~' ~ ~J~'. ~, ;that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by Sworn to before me this'~ dayof z~.x~z.o~ ,icj Notary Public L!NDA F. KOWALSKI ~LQTAR'( PUBLIC, State of New No, 52'4524771 QUalified in Suflolk County Comrdis~ion £xpires March 30, NAME P 232 268 881 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL / (See Reverse) / PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ADDRESS : P 232 268 880 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATION,I L MAIL I (See Rew SPECIAL DELIVERY SHOW TO WHOM AND DELIvERE9 WITH RESFR,CfED P 232 268 882 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOED--~ NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See F P 232 268 883 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- P 232 268 879 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) PO, STATE AN D ZIP CODE CERTIFIED FEE ~ ~ OATEDELIVERED P 232 268 884 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ~E~TRICfED DELIVE~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION ' (o~vner or authorized oge~t' of owner) ~x ~address OW owner or authorized agent of/Owner) f' PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinc~nce ~..../....~...~.. Other Applicable Law~_s,?rd,~an~ulatio, ns~~.~-~;..- ,z~Y~'~ at ;remises hereinafter descn~be~ in ~h~t ....~..~..'~...:...~...~~~~-~/~', .................... ............................................. (State section or paragraph of applicable law, ordmonce or regulation; YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the Iow and to remedy the conditions above mentioned forthwith on or before the ......... ~..,~....~'. ................ : ............................ & day of .................................. 19..'~.... The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishabie by fine or imprisohment or both. Building Inspector JUl)ITt1 T. 1 ~ RR OFFICE OF TIlE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTI1OLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 $outhold. New York 1 !o7t TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1801 August 19, 1983 Mr. Robert J. Douglass Willow Terrace Lane P.O. Box 773 Orient, New York 11957 Dear Mr. Douglass: I am returning herewith your application for Junkyard License submitted to me on this date. After consulting with Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Department Head, he advises me that you must apply to the Board of Appeals under the Zoning Ordinance. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Nevi]Yle Deputy Town Clerk SHORT ENVIRON~ENT.~L ASSESSMENT FOP~M O o~ ~J O INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short EAr is is assLu~ad that the preparer will use currently available information concer~ing the project and tbs likely impacts of the action. It is not expected t.hat additional studies, research or other investigations wi_Il be undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is no~ significant. (d) Enviror_zental Assessment 3. g. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. Will project result in a large physical c~mnge to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of !and? · · . . . . . · . . Will there be a ~Jor change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? · . · Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . . Will project have a potentially large lmpac~ on groundwater quality? Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? . . . . . . . . . . Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? . . . . . . . . . Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? , . , Will project have a mmJor effect on visual char- acter of the coramunity or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? . . . Will project adversely impact any site or struct- ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? . . · Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? . . . Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? . . . Will project regularly cause Objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- ance as a result of the project's opera%ion? · Will project have any impact on public health or Will project Affect the existing community by directly causing a growth in permanent popula- tion of more than 5 percent over a one-year period or have a major negative effect on the character of %he com. munity cr neighborhood?. . Yes X No Yes / No Yes ~ No Yes y No Yes ~ No Yes ~ No Yes ~ No Yes ~ No Yes _~_ No Yes /~ No Yes X No Yes _~ No Yes X No Yes ~ No there ers?~Incern~n~ the project? Yes No PR~P~RE~ S SIGNaTU~ ' TITLE: REPRESE~;TING: DATE: 9/1/78 s ~Da-~= ) To: Southo!d Town ~ - z - no~r~ of Appeals · Main Road Sou~nolm, NY lc~ ~ D~ Sirs: In reference to the New Yo~.~. S~==e Tida~ ~' ~-~ = ,~et_ancs Lanc-Use Recu!ations, 6 ~'?~-~ _ N ..... ~, ~=-.. 661, and Article 25 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law, please be advised that ~h~ suojec% proseruv irj e;,~ · * , .. . . . ~ within appeal appizcatzon: (please c ...... one box) [ ] May be located wznnzn 300 feet of tidal wetlands; · , ~,~.-, cons~r~ctac alons the water-Zyin9 edge of this prcper2y is a uZxa_ae in very good condition and at least lO0 feet in length.* [ ] Ma,, bi located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; o.s~c_=~ along the w~er-lyzn~ ed~e of this property is a bulkhead (major) repairs, and approximately fe~* in length. - - [ ] [ ] not appear to May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, con=~uc~ed along the water-lying edco of t~,ls property lsa bulk in length. - h~am less than 100 May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; a~d ~h,~e is no bulkhead or ~=+ · ' ...... con .... e wall exmstln Is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands to the best of ray knowledge°* [otar~ed items ) indicate your prooertv does fall within the jurisdiction of the N.Y.S. D.~.C.] Sincerely yours, NOTE: If proposed project falls witNh.in D.E.C. jurisdiction, approval must be received an~ submitted to our office before your application can be scheduled for a public heari \ \ COUNTY OF SUFFOI. Properly To~ Service NOTE. KIN H, Kine Kenneth I. ~ Muriel H Bro n David G. ~ potricio perkins DouqlOse N, BI~ Michael C. l~ ,otherine A. ' Bogden · Willow curtis A. Norklun NonCY £' Miller Robert J.~,~Y Robert 0 ~ Agnes Bt. eh, her D~o~ ' '~o "~ /o3.po' ~ / Wi/Mw F~rrac~ /~c. Inc. , H~8~1'50"~ 116.13' Robert ~Z Oouglas~ W/'llow Terrace Form~s, Inc SURVEY FOR ROBERT J. DOUGLASS ~'T ORIENT TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK