Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-10045FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No ........ Date ...... ff.l~y. THIS CERTIFIES that the building ................................................ Location of Property . .5..8~..0..~..r.e.a.l~.. p.~p.o.n. ~.c..B.~.y..B~..v..c3., ......... Ie.8.l,?.~.l' ,..N.:Y.: ..... House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ..... .1.2.8...Block ...2. ........... Lot ~.~.~.~..e.r~y...P.t....~ Minor Subdivision ....Z..1~..No.....2.0.67............. Filed Map No ......... Lot No. ~.~.8.$.~.r.1~.... Reoulrement~ ..f. or~o~q-f~m~ly ~.~ell~g_~q__ilt prior to conforms substantially to the ~,l~iaa, t, io~gc~r,-l~uildmg~m~t-nere, ro~e~42ileat.2m-ma~ o~;~aarea- Certificate of Occupancy Z1~4= ... Sp.~.~.l...2.~. ........ , 19 2.7. pursuant to which l~itdiog-P-e~mi4-No, ......... Y~.. ?. ........ dated .... .J.l~..y...2.~. ............... 19...~,0~as issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... The certificate is issued to ...~.O..hla...~.....lyl.~.~.~..~.ly..&...W.f.o. ............................... [owner, of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval ....N/.R. ................................... UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO ........... N'/'R' '~ Building Inspector Rev 4/79 BUILDING DEPARTr~ENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. HOUSING CODE INSPECTION REPORT Location 5800 Great Peconic Bay Blvd. (number & street) Minor Subdivision ZBA No. 2067 Map No. , Laurel, N.Y. (Municipality) Lot(s) Name of Owner(s) John F. McFeely & wf. Occupancy Admitted by: R-I (type) Mr. Moore (owner-tenant) Accompanied by: Mr. Moore Key available Suffolk Co. Tax No. 1000-128-2-9 Source of request Gary Flanner 01sen~ Esq. Date July 8, 1980 DWELLING: Type of construction Foundation cement block Total rooms, 1st. F1 6 Bathroom(s) g Porch, type Breezeway Type Heat Fireplace(s) 1 Domestic hotwater Other wood #stories Cellar Crawl space 2nd. F1 I 3rd. F1 Toilet room(s) Deck, type Garage Warm Air No. Exits yes Type heater SUMMER RESIDENCE ONLY Patio, type.__ Utility room Hotwater 2 Airconditionin~ electri¢ I 1/2 X ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: Garage, type const. Swimming pool Other NONE Storage, type const. Guest, type const. VIOLATIONS: Housing Code, Chapter 52 Location Description Art. Sec. Upstairs No hand rail Stairs very narrow II 52-27 A~ Upstairs Pipe showing above floor V 52-51A 1st. floor D~thr0om floor - bad , II 52-26-4 bath Remarks: Inspected by: ~~' '/~ Date of Insp. July 21, 1980 Curtis Horton Time start 10:15 end 10:45 South~l~ Town Board of Appeals -13- July 24, 1975 The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED, Twin Fork Fence Co. a/c Digate Concrete Products, Inc., Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct 6 foot cyclone fenc'e , as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2067 - 8:55 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Gary F. Olsen, Esq. a/c John McFeely, 44 Dorchester Road, Rockville Centre, N. ¥. for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property with insufficient width and area. Location of property: S/S Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, N. Y., bounded on the north by Peconic Bay Blvd., east by John Rozansky; south by Peconic Bay; west by Rosin & Liquori. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Originally, the application showed 97,000 sq. ft., the figures didn't jibe. That has been changed to read "77,000 sq. ft." THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? GARY FLANNER OLSEN, ESQ.: I represent John McFeely. THE CHAIRMAN: }{ave you made any application to the Department of Environmental Conservation? MR. OLSEN: No, I have not but if that is required by this Board I will do so. There is a house on there now and there are no wetlands so I can't imagine it being denied by D.E.C. I can get something from them in a couple of weeks. THE CHAIRMAN: We can make a decision, subject to. A decision has to be made within 60 days. A photostat of the County Tax Map indicates that the adjoining property to the east is a narrow lot and the lots to the west are all either the same size or smaller Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- July 24, 1975 than the proposed lots. If you go further west than that you find a lot of smaller lots. Across the street there are four lots similar in size. MR. GARY OLSEN: As I indicated in the application, the total area of the property can be divided to almost meet the 80,000 sq. ft. requirement. We have 77,000 sq. ft. so the spirit of the Ordinance would be upheld. I also have a copy of the tax map indicating that subject premises is oversized in comparison with the properties surrounding it. It would create two parcels which would be almost 40,000 sq. ft. each. This property, historically, was two pieces. There was property on Peconic Bay Boulevard with a right of way to the beach. This reflected on the tax map. That small piece and the larger parcel have been taken by the same owner. They have not been kept in single and separate ownership. We just want two large pieces, 39,000 sq. ft. and 38,000 sq. ft., and presently it is the intention of my client to move the house to the westerly portion, or parcel, if it's movable. There is a fireplace in it. Maybe the house will have to be destroyed. He would like to build a new house on the easterly piece. There is plenty of frontage and density. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? MR. McGOWAN: I own the adjoining property to the west and I want to register an objection. The building referred to here is a shell and is strictly a rental. We have had difficulty with the t~nants. The proposal is to move it closer. It would depreciate my property, the house is up on blocks. I have no objection to the division of the property but I do object to having the house moved closer. The purpose of this house is for rentals. THE CHAIRMAN: The purpose of this application is for division of property. Are they going to sell these lots? MR. OLSEN: I don't think their plans are firmed up. He wants to divide and have a saleable parcel. MR. McGOWAN: It's obvious that it would still be a rental. Southold Town Board -of Appeals -15- July 24, 1975 THE CHAIRMAN: Maybe they will tear it down. MR. ROSIN: Mr. Liquori and myself are on the west. We split the expenses on beach and bulkheading. One of the factors is if he should move that house it would be on a section where there is badly damaged bulkheading. If he has any intentions of selling this, in the meantime there would be some time elapsing and that whole thing could be wiped out. MR. McGOWAN: We are low. We have had 10 feet of water in the house in 1969. We repaired our house. That house was never repaired. There was a storm in 1969 and it broke the bulkheading. He is going to be a new neighbor. I can guarantee you that that house will be a rental. MR. OLSEN: I represent the purchaser. The property is owned by the Estate of Leonard Plechavicius. MR. McGOWAN: What about wells and cesspools? THE CHAIRMAN: That is under the jurisdiction of the Health Department. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to divide property with insufficient width and area on the south side of Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel, N. Y. The findings of the Board are that applicant is surrounded by properties of smaller size and the variance requested is less than 5% of the required 40,000 sq. ft. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; . the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the ©rdinanceo On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Gary F. Olsen, Esq. a/c John McFeely, 44 Dorchester Road, Rockville Centre, N. Y. be GRANTED permission to divide property, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- July 24, 1975 That the present residence which is located partially on both of the lots to be created by this action shall be either moved to a proper location, under the Zoning Ordinance, or abolished. That this approval of the Board of Appeals shall be subject to Department of Environmental Conservation approval. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse. Gary Olsen, Esq. and Mr. Brian Sheehan had a discussion with the Board with respect to the keeping of large animals. Mr. Olsen said that Mr. Sheehan is contemplating purchasing property from the Adel minor subdivision on the new road opposite Mattituck Manor. He only wants to purchase the property if it can be used as a mini farm with animals. Mr. Sheehan said that he would like to put a house up and raise a few head of cattle, and perhaps some chickens and a few Pigs or goats. He would like to be fairly self-sufficient with animals and a garden. He said he is from Southampton and is a teacher but a frustrated farmer. He has raised chickens and pigs and has enjoyed doing that. He said he and his family would like to live here and be as self-sufficient as possible. He would commute to Southampton to teach. Mr. Olsen said that it appears a person would be permitted to have up to seven large animals. Mr. Hulse said "this is a restrictive Ordinance" Mr. Olsen said"that is why I am here. I would like an opinion. I talked to Mr. Tasker and he thought the proposed uses would be permitted under accessory use since it's not being used as a farm. His house would be there so this would be accessory use. He seemed to feel that it would be permitted as accessory use. If he were having a farm he would need 10 acres but with a house there, he can do it. However, I don't want to tell Mr. Sheehan that he can do it until I have an opinion from the Board." THE CHAIRMAN: This would be non-commercial, just for your own use? MR. SHEEHAN: Yes. TOWN OF SOu'rJIOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF ~raE ZONI~IG BOARD OF APFEAL$ Appeal No. 2067 DaSd ~CTZON OF r~ ZOm~G ~O~ OF ~ O~ ~ TO~ O~ SOUW~O~ 44 at a meettng of the Zonin~ Board of Appeals on ~'~ly 24, 1975 Appellan~ ~ the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zonin~ Ordinance ( ~ Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be den/ed pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance ~n! the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because O~SS P.M, (K.D.S.T.] upon applioatiorl of clo~y F. lsq. a/o Jo~m ~zreely, 44 Doroh~st~ l~md, Px~villo C~mtre, S. for · varl&uoe In &ooordin~e vita the ZonIng C~dininoe, Article laotian 100-30 end Bulk Schedule for permission to div~le ky Blvd., I~u~el, New York, bounded on the north by Peptonic alvd., mt I~ John ltosensky; south by Peoonio hyr vest by Rosin & LiquOri. Fee paid $15.00. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties hardship because (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (e) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of the district because (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Budding Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. FORM ZB4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS that ~~ r~eots ~so~on ~o d~v~do p~ty ~ ~y ~~d, ~el, H, Y, Tho ~~o or the ~ar~ are ~uld pr~uce ~a~l dAffA~ltiea or ~eo~ ~f~,pp ~ ~eh~p or~t~ ~8 ~e ~ ~uld not ~ ~h~ ~ of ~he ~d~ce, That ~o present resAdence vhlah AS located ~t~ly on ~ of the lots That th~s ~pprov&l of tl~ Board of Appeals shall he sub, eot to Department o~ ~nv~onmental