Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHeritage Community Air Monitoring Plan and Attachments 10-12-16 4 Community Air MonitorinPI s -� W2 � � v a z Q r,The Heritage atCutchogue a = Z 60 Schoolhouse Road and Griffin9 Street � Cutcho ue, New York ' F FFn i nl ,� S 'uihoio Town ! Q Planning c pard `C C ep i .j (�Q PRP ► R 1 OR PRPA1 BY HeritageThe ., Ocean172 1-D North Medford, 11 Motor A tt: clo John M. Wagner,Esq. Hauppauge,NY 11788 Certilman Balin Adler&Hyman . ill October2016 vovhb Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 General......................................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Description and Background...............................................................................2 1.3 Potential Air Emissions Related to Remedial Action Activities..................................3 1.4 Air Emissions and Control Measures.........................................................................3 2.0 Air Monitoring Procedures...............................................................................................................5 2.1 General......................................................................................................................5 2.2 VOC Monitoring.........................................................................................................5 2.3 Particulate Matter Monitoring.....................................................................................6 2.4 Action Levels..............................................................................................................6 2.4.1 Action Level for PM,o....................................................................................6 2.5 Meteorological Monitoring..........................................................................................6 2.6 Instrument Calibration................................................................................................7 3.0 Monitoring Schedule and Data Collection and Reporting.............................................................8 3.1 Monitoring Schedule..................................................................................................8 3.2 Data Collection and Reporting...................................................................................8 Appendices Attachment A Figures Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Soil Management Plan—Soil Stripping Plan Attachment B New York State Department of Health(NYSDOH)Generic Community Air Monitoring Plan, December 2009 Attachment C New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC) Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(TAGM—4031) Attachment D Monitoring Equipment Specifications Attachment E Preparer Information Table of Contents vovhb 1180 Introduction 1.1 General On behalf of The Heritage at Cutchogue,LLC,VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C. (VHB)has prepared this Community Air Monitoring Plan(CAMP)in association with a Soil Management Plan(SMP)that will be implemented for the development of an age-restricted condominium complex,to be situated on 45.99±acres at the intersection of Schoolhouse Road and Griffing Street, in the hamlet of Cutchogue,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York (hereinafter the"subject property"). In accordance with the SMP,due to elevated concentrations of arsenic in on-site soils that exceed New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC) Part 375 Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives(UUSCOs),preparation of a CAMP is required and will be implemented as part of soil management activities at the subject property or the"site." This CAMP fulfills the requirements set forth by the New York State Department of Health(NYSDOH)Generic Community Air Monitoring Plan, dated December 2009,and NYSDEC Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(under the Technical Assistance and Guidance Memorandum[TAGM]—4031) (Appendices B and C,respectively). The intent of this CAMP is to provide for a measure of protection for downwind communities from potential airborne releases of constituents of concern during on-site remedial activities. These activities will include excavation and removal of impacted soils from areas of proposed excavation and build-out. This CAMP specifies potential air emissions,air monitoring procedures,a monitoring schedule,and data collection and reporting. 1 Introduction vovhb 1.2 Site Description and Background Based upon the results of the Pesticide Report for the Heritage @ Cutchogue(Pesticide Report),prepared by Nelson&Pope(N&P)in 2007,soil sampling was conducted throughout the subject property in order to investigate potential subsurface impacts relating to agricultural uses. As indicated in the DEIS,impacted soils relating to mercury and arsenic were identified in surficial soils and SMP activities were warranted throughout the subject property. However,it should be noted that soil sample results under the Pesticide Report were compared to standards that have since been superseded by the prevailing New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC)Division of Environmental Remediation (DER)Soil Cleanup Objectives(SCOs)provided in 6 NYCRR§375-6.8(a)or(b). When compared to prevailing NYSDEC Part 375 UUSCOs,mercury detections fall below the most stringent SCOs(i.e.,below 0.18 micrograms per kilogram[ug/kg] [a.k.a.parts per billion tppb}])and only arsenic requires on-site soil management. Given these conditions,VHB has developed an SMP to manage on-site soils impacted with arsenic. Furthermore,VHB has prepared an associated site-specific Construction Health and Safety Plan(CHASP)(provided under separate cover),and this CAMP to address both worker safety during SMP activities, and to mitigate fugitive dust migration in accordance with New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)guidelines. The development will feature a four-phase buildout. As indicated on the Soil Management Plan—Soil Stripping Plan(provided in Attachment A of this CAMP), four(4)designated stockpile areas have been included in the development plans and will be utilized for each associated buildout phase. For each development phase,the top twelve(12)inches of topsoil material will be stripped off by the general contractor from the respective development phase area and stockpiled in the designated stockpile area. Topsoil will only be stripped in the respective project phase areas or as directed by the project engineer. Care will be taken to protect and not disturb areas that are designated to be left in natural conditions. Due to mixing during excavation and staging,the potential exists for arsenic- impacted concentrations within the stockpiled soils to fall below currently applicable regulatory standards. As such,stockpile sampling for arsenic will be conducted in accordance with the testing protocol and frequency set forth in NYSDEC DER-10 Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation,May 2010,Table 5.4(e)10 involving discrete and composite sampling. Stockpiles that contain levels of arsenic below the NYSDEC standard of 13 mg/kg will be utilized as topsoil for final grading and landscaping. If any stockpile sample results contain arsenic that exceeds the applicable NYSDEC standard of 13 mg/kg, 2 Introduction vovhb clean sand will be utilized by the general contractor to mix with the impacted stockpiles in order to reduce levels of arsenic to concentrations that fall below current regulatory standards. Upon completion of mixing,stockpiles will be re-sampled for arsenic in accordance with the testing protocols established in NYSDEC's DER-10. If arsenic levels fall below the NYSDEC standard of 13 mg/kg,the general contractor will utilize the respective stockpiles as topsoil. It should be noted that topsoil will only be used in areas approved by the geotechnical engineer and environmental consultant(i.e.,landscaped areas,etc.). Areas that require mixing with fill materials (i.e.,below pavement,etc.)will be placed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer to ensure structural integrity. The purpose of this CAMP is to continuously monitor air quality during the soil management activities,described above,in order to minimize any potential inhalation hazards to on-site occupants,and to prevent fugitive dust migration off- site during soil excavation and removal activities. 1.3 Potential Air Emissions Related to Remedial Action Activities Certain intrusive remedial activities at the site have the potential to generate localized impacts to air quality. Such activities include the following: > Stripping of impacted soils to a depth of up to 12 inches below grade. > Stockpiling of stripped soils within designated development phase areas. > Mixing of impacted soils with clean sand within designated stockpile areas. 1.4 Air Emissions and Control Measures Air emissions control and fugitive dust suppression techniques will be used during the remedial activities identified above,as necessary,to limit the air/odor emissions from the site. Air monitoring for the specific purpose of protecting the community from site activity impacts will take place during both intrusive and non-intrusive site activities. During intrusive and non-intrusive site activities,odor and dust control measures will be available at the site and used when necessary. The following dust suppression measures may be used during these activities,depending upon specific circumstances and air monitoring results. > Water spray > Polyethylene sheeting(as necessary to cover any soils that may require stockpiling) 3 Introduction vovhb Dust emissions at the site will be controlled by spraying water on exposed dry surface soil areas and by covering stockpiles. Odor and dust control measures will be implemented based on visual or olfactory observations,and the results of airborne particulate monitoring. 4 Introduction vovhb 2 * 0 Air Monitoring Procedures 2.1 General Real-time air monitoring will be implemented at the site for particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter(PMio). A site boundary will be established for the purpose of air monitoring. Upwind and downwind monitoring locations will be determined and one unit will be placed at each location. This will be adjusted on a daily basis. For the duration of the air monitoring,upwind air monitoring will take place at the commencement of daily soil management activities to establish a daily baseline. The monitoring will then commence at both upwind and downwind locations continuously during all earthmoving activities. All monitoring will be electronically logged in the field instruments that record both peak and a time-weighted average of dust particle readings. 2.2 VOC Monitoring The SMP,CAMP and CHASP documents have been prepared for this site due to elevated concentrations of arsenic only. As the NYSDOH guidance document states that"...sites known to be contaminated with heavy metals alone may only require particulate monitoring",volatile organic compound(VOC)monitoring is not required or included in this CAMP. 5 Air Monitoring Procedures vovhb 2.3 Particulate Matter Monitoring As required by NYSDOH and NYSDEC guidance,real-time particulate matter will be monitored continuously during site activities using instrumentation equipped with electronic data-logging capabilities. A DR-4000 Dust Monitor(or equivalent)will be used to conduct the real-time PMio monitoring. Fugitive dust migration will be visually assessed during all work activities,and reasonable dust suppression techniques will be used during any site activities that may generate fugitive dust. 2.4 Action Levels The action levels provided below are to be used to initiate response actions,if necessary. 2.4.1 Action Level for PMlo As required by NYSDOH and NYSDEC guidance documents,if the ambient air concentration of PMio at any one(or more)of the sampling locations is noted at levels in excess of 100 micrograms per cubic meter(µ/m3)above the background(upwind location)for a period of 15 minutes,or if airborne dust is observed leaving the work area,intrusive site activities will be temporarily halted,the source of the elevated PM10 concentration will be identified, corrective actions to reduce or abate the emissions will be undertaken,and air monitoring will continue. Work may continue following the implementation of dust suppression techniques provided the PMio levels do not exceed 150 µ/m3 over background levels. If levels continue to be elevated,intrusive site activities will be halted and emissions control measures implemented. 2.5 Meteorological Monitoring Wind direction will be monitored periodically at the site using a windsock or other appropriate equipment. Wind direction will be established at the start of each work day and may be re-established at any time during the work day if a significant shift in wind direction is noted. 6 Air Monitoring Procedures vovhb 2.6 Instrument Calibration Calibration of the PMio instrumentation will occur in accordance with each of the equipment manufacturer's calibration and quality assurance requirements. The PMio monitors will be calibrated at least daily,and calibrations will be recorded in the field activity book. 7 Air Monitoring Procedures vovhb 300 Monitoring Schedule and Data Collection and Reporting The proposed monitoring schedule and data collection and reporting requirements are discussed below. 3.1 Monitoring Schedule Real-time PMto monitoring will be performed continuously throughout the remedial action during intrusive site/materials handling activities,until completion of all excavation and earth-moving activities. 3.2 Data Collection and Reporting Air monitoring data will be collected continuously from PMio monitors during intrusive site activities by an electronic data-logging system.A Thermo MIE DR-4000 dust monitor,or equivalent,will be used. The Data Real-Time Aerosol Monitor measures mass concentrations of airborne dust,smoke,mists,haze and fumes and provides continuous real-time readouts. Respirable PMto correlated measurements will be logged and recorded over the work period. Air monitoring data and tables will be provided to the Client at the conclusion of the project in conjunction with the SMP Closure Report. J:\29305.00 Heritage Cutchogue\ProjRecords\FinalDocs\community Air Monitoring Ptan.doc 8 Monitoring Schedule and Data Collection and Reporting This Community Air Monitoring Plan was prepared by: Prepared by: Bryan Murty Senior Project Manager VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C. Signature: b Supervised by: Stephen Kaplan Director,OHM Services VHS Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C. / C Signature: by ' '"Ovhb ATTACHMENT A Attachment A F`Q�9rPP'. � - •y, r r ",� ' � - fes, �� .'44 V. �Q 44, 4- , +•* i i !'S 71r, > • r tF,. ! !:" yw oo 77 7W AW fAp dr Sr �� . :,'�Y ,yTj.. �. t'•.• ?".S fi. ���� i �'��r ...� `/ash * � 1,k y +' ,ssy. ;�' ``yy 7'*��. ; �°::1�7� �a ., _ �'r., F ..� +� ,q��4P � •`Si� s, mrd . ��� `•_ ,�;,, ,' •+ ac ti ,.ttr'•� � �,�,,, � co,%a% ``ate �� �•.�; �f•� • • •� '+ � • ,yppJ � .�y •,- �� ��' � pa" 4�.•;��:,,�" i • , d �'e ! % x�f . , c� orf ' r ``S`� . , J J �v w /,,.• o d 9 ' <�• ; � ♦ � �� " ,� .r �� „S fes- 5tute = P N PLUM ISLAND `"' = �• Long Island Sound �GARDINERS IS. �'* l w SHELTER ISLAND - •�. . '� r o SOUTHOL'D � EAST HAMPTON r. ;+, d �• ��?� RIVERHEAD �• •I ♦ f t 7 .L' ,i • a r { k~ t' Y ROOKHAVEN SOUTHAMPTON ►"` r+l a ro ! �. r r �� !�! :'• :. '� y SHINNECOCK BAY The Heritage at Cutchogue Figure 1 — Site Location n/s/o Intersection of Griffing Street and Schoolhouse Lane N Legend's Engineering,surveying 1 inch=386 feet Vhb and Landscape Architecture,P.C. Hamlet of Cutchogue,Town of Southold W E Feet Subject Property SOURCE:2013 NYS Digital Ortho-imyery Suffolk County,NY 11935 S 0 135 270 540 Cutchogue Hamlet Center Boundary ©Npe file 2013.Hamlet Center boundary VHB Ref.29305.00 � . .■ 9 rY shapefile based on Southold Hamlet Study, North American Datum,1983-New York Long Island State Plane 2005. vovhb ATTACHMENT B Attachment B i Appendix.1A New York State Department of Health Generic Community Air Monitoring Plan Overview A Community Air Monitoring Plan(CAMP)requires real-time monitoring for volatile organic _ compounds(VOCs)and particulates(i.e., dust)at the downwind perimeter of each designated work area when certain activities are in progress at contaminated sites. The CAMP is not intended for use in establishing action levels for worker respiratory protection.Rather,its intent Js to provide a measure of 1 protection for the downwind community(i.e.,off-site receptors.including residences and businesses and on-site workers not directly involved with the subject work activities)from potential airborne contaminant releases as a direct result of investigative and remedial work activities.The action levels Al specified herein require increased monitoring, corrective actions to abate emissions, and/or work shutdown.Additionally,the CAMP helps to confirm that work activities did not spread contamination off-site through the air. I The generic CAMP presented below will be sufficient to cover many,if not most,sites. Specific i requirements should be reviewed for each situation in consultation with NYSDOH to ensure proper applicability.In some cases, a separate site-specific CAMP or supplement may be required.Depending upon the nature of contamination,chemical-specific monitoring with appropriately-sensitive methods may be required.Depending upon the proximity of potentially exposed individuals more stringent } monitoring or response levels than those presented below may be required. Special requirements will be necessary for work within 20 feet of potentially exposed individuals or structures and for indoor work with co-located residences or facilities. These requirements should be determined in consultation with A. NYSDOH.- _i i Reliance on the CAMP should not preclude simple, common-sense measures to keep VOCs, dust, and odors at a minimum around the work areas. # Community Air Monitoring Plan Depending upon the nature of.known or potential contaminants at each site,real-time air � monitoring for VOCs and/or particulate levels at the perimeter of the exclusion zone or work area will be necessary.Most sites will involve VOC and particulate monitoring; sites known to be contaminated with heavy metals alone may only require particulate monitoring.If radiological contamination is a concern, additional monitoring requirements-may be necessary per consultation with appropriate DEC/NYSDOH staff. =f Continuous monitoring will be required for all ground intrusive activities and during the demolition of contaminated or potentially contaminated structures. Ground intrusive activities include,but are not limited to, soil/waste excavation and handling,test pitting or trenching, and the installation of soil borings or monitoring wells. Periodic,monitoring for VOCs will be required during non-intrusive activities such as the collection of soil and sediment samples or the collection of.groundwater samples from existing j monitoring wells. "Periodic"monitoring during sample collection might reasonably consist of taking a reading upon arrival at a sample location,monitoring while opening a well cap or Final DER-10 Page 204 of 226 Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation May 2010 z F` overturning soil,monitoring during well baling/purging, and taking a reading prior to leaving a sample location.In some instances,depending upon the proximity of potentially exposed individuals, continuous monitoring may be required during sampling activities.Examples of such situations include groundwater sampling at wells on the curb of a busy urban street, in the midst of a public park, or adjacent to a school or residence. VOC Monitoring Response Levels and Actions Volatile organic compounds(VOCs)must be monitored at the'-downwind perimeter of the immediate work area(i.e.,the exclusion zone) on a continuous basis or as otherwise specified.Upwind concentrations should be measured at the start of each workday and periodically thereafter to establish background conditions,particularly if wind direction changes. The monitoring work should be performed using equipment appropriate to measure the types of contaminants known or suspected to be present. The equipment should be, 'ca at least daily for the contaminant(s) of concern or for an appropriate surrogate. The equipment should be capable of calculating 15-minute running average i concentrations,which will be compared to the levels specified below. I. If the ambient air concentration of total organic vapors at the downwind perimeter of the work area or exclusion zone exceeds 5 parts per million(ppm) above background for the 15-minute average, G work activities must be temporarily halted and-monitoring continued.If the total organic vapor level readily decreases(per instantaneous readings)below 5 ppm over background,.work activities can resume with continued monitoring. i r 2. If total organic vapor levels at the downwind perimeter of the work area or exclusion zone persist at levels in excess of 5 ppm over background but less than 25 ppm,work.activities must be halted,the source of vapors identified, corrective actions taken to abate emissions, and monitoringIV . continued.After these steps,work activities can resume provided that the total organic vapor level 200 feet downwind of the exclusion zone or half the distance to the nearest potential receptor or r, residential/commercial structure,whichever is less-but in no case less than 20 feet, is below 5 ppm over background for the 15-minute average. 3. If the organic vapor level is above 25 ppm at the perimeter of the work area, activities must be shutdown. n` 4. All 15-minute readings must be recorded and be available for State(DEC and NYSDOH) R personnel to review. Instantaneous readings,if any,used for decision purposes should also be recorded. Particulate Monitoring,Response Levels, and Actions 1 l; Particulate concentrations should be monitored continuously at the upwind and downwind -perimeters of the exclusion zone at temporary particulate monitoring stations.The particulate l monitoring should be performed using real-time monitoring equipment capable of measuring particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in size (PM-10)and capable of integrating over a period of 15 minutes (or less)for comparison to the airborne particulate action level.The equipment must be equipped with an audible alarm to indicate exceedance of the action level.In addition,fugitive dust migration should be visually assessed during all work activities. i i I Final DER-10 Page 205 of 226 Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation May 2010 I. If the downwind PM-10 particulate level is 100 micrograms per cubic meter(mcg/m3)greater than background(upwind perimeter)for the 15-minute period or if airborne dust is observed leaving the work area,then dust suppression techniques must be employed. Work may continue with dust suppression techniques provided that downwind PM-10 particulate levels do not exceed 150 mcg/m3 above the upwind level and provided that no visible dust is migrating from the work area. 2. If,after implementation of dust suppression techniques, downwind PM-10 particulate levels .. are greater than 150 mcg/m3 above the upwind level,work must be stopped and a re-evaluation of activities initiated. Work can resume provided that dust suppression measures and other controls are successful in reducing the downwind PM-10 particulate concentration to within 150 mcg/m3 of the upwind level and in preventing visible dust migration. 3. . All readings must be recorded and be available for State(DEC and NYSDOH)and County _ Health personnel to review. December 2009 i i i • i E I I, i i ' Jit i - i Final DER-10 Page 206 of 226 -Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation May 2010 vovhb ATTACHMENT C Attachment C Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(TAGM-403 1)-NYS D... Page 1 of 4 NEWYORKRATE DEPARTMENT OF qww ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Fugitive Dust Suppression and .Particulate Monitoring Program (TAGM - 4031 ) Issuing Authority: Michael J. O'Toole, Jr. Title: Director, Division of Environmental Remediation Date Issued: Oct 27, 1989 1. Introduction Fugitive dust suppression, particulate monitoring, and subsequent action levels for such must be used and applied consistently during remedial activities at hazardous waste sites. This guidance provides a basis for developing and implementing a fugitive dust suppression and particulate monitoring program as an element of a hazardous waste site's health and safety program. 2. Background Fugitive dust is particulate matter--a generic term for a broad class of chemically and physically diverse substances that exist as discrete particles, liquid droplets or solids, over a wide range of sizes--which becomes airborne and contributes to air quality as a nuisance and threat to human health and the environment. On July 1, 1987, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)revised the ambient air quality standard for particulates so as to reflect direct impact on human health by setting the standard for particulate matter less than ten microns in diameter(PMI,);this i involves fugitive dust whether contaminated or not. Based upon an examination of air quality composition, respiratory tract deposition, and health effects, PM 10 is considered conservative for the primary standard--that requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety. The primary standards are 150 ug/m3 over a 24-hour averaging time and 50 ug/m3 over an annual averaging time. Both of these standards are to be averaged arithmetically. There exists real-time monitoring equipment available to measure PM10 and capable of integrating over a period of six seconds to ten hours. Combined with an adequate fugitive dust suppression program, such equipment will aid in preventing the off-site migration of contaminated soil. It will also protect both on-site personnel from exposure to high levels of dust and the public around the site from any exposure to any dust. While specifically intended for the protection of on-site personnel as well as the public, this program is not meant to }iffn•��n n:nv ion,,.....,../.....-..7..ai_.__/n inn i n ',', Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(TAGM-403 1)-NYS D... Page 2 of 4 replace long-term monitoring which may be required given the contaminants inherent to the site and its air quality. 3. Guidance A program for suppressing fugitive dust and monitoring particulate matter at hazardous waste sites can be developed without placing an undue burden on remedial activities while still being protective of health and environment. Since the responsibility for implementing this program ultimately will fall on the party performing the work, these procedures must be incorporated into appropriate work plans. The following fugitive dust suppression and particulate monitoring j program will be employed at hazardous waste sites during construction and other activities which warrant its use: 1. Reasonable fugitive dust suppression techniques must be employed during all site i activities which may generate fugitive dust. 2. Particulate monitoring must be employed during the handling of waste or contaminated soil or when activities on site maygenerate fugitive dust from exposed-waste or contaminated soil. Such activities shall also include the excavation, grading, or placement of clean fill, and control measures therefore should be considered. 3. Particulate monitoring must be performed using real-time particulate monitors and shall monitor particulate matter less than ten microns (PMI o)with the following minimum performance.standards: Object to be measured: Dust, Mists, Aerosols Size range: <0.1 to 10 microns Sensitivity: 0.001 mg/m3 Range: 0.001 to 10 mg/m3 Overall Accuracy: x-10% as compared to gravimetric analysis of stearic acid or reference dust I Operating Conditions: Temperature: 0 to 40°C Humidity: 10 to 99% Relative Humidity Power: Battery operated with a minimum capacity of eight hours continuous operation Automatic alarms are suggested. Particulate levels will be monitored immediately downwind at the working site and integrated over a period not to exceed 15 minutes. Consequently, instrumentation shall t,f+„•/Axnxnxr rlPr nv anv/rF:vjilntinn.-/2620.html?ShoWUrintstvlcs 3/18/2010 Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(TA.GM-4031)-NYS D... Page 3 of 4 require necessary averaging hardware to accomplish this task; the P-5 Digital Dust Indicator as manufactured by MDA Scientific, Inc. or similar is appropriate. 4. In order to ensure the validity of the fugitive dust measurements performed, there must be appropriate Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC). It is the responsibility of the entity operating the equipment to adequately supplement QA/QC Plans to include the following critical features: periodic instrument calibration, operator training, daily instrument performance (span) checks, and a record keeping plan. 5. The action level will be established at 150 ug/m3 over the integrated period not to exceed 15 minutes. While conservative, this short-term interval will provide a real-time assessment of on-site air qualityto assure both health and safety. If particulate levels are detected in excess of 150 ug/m3, the upwind background level must be measured immediately using the same portable monitor. If the working site particulate measurement is greater than 100 ug/m3 above the background level, additional dust suppression techniques must be implemented to reduce the generation of fugitive dust I and corrective action taken to protect site personnel and reduce the potential for contaminant migration. Corrective measures may include increasing the level of personal protection for on-site personnel and implementing additional dust suppression techniques (see Paragraph 7). Should the action level of 150 ug/m3 be exceeded, the Division of Air Resources must be notified in writing within five working days;the notification shall include a description of the control measures implemented to prevent further exceedences. I 6. It must be recognized that the generation of dust from waste or contaminated soil that . migrates off-site, has the potential for transporting contaminants off-site. There may be situations when dust is being generated and leaving the site and the monitoring equipment does not measure PM10 at or above the action level. Since this situation has the potential to migrate contaminants off-site, it is unacceptable. While it is not practical to quantify total suspended particulates on a real-time basis, it is appropriate to rely on visual observation. If dust is observed leaving the working site, additional dust suppression techniques must be employed. Activities that have a high dusting potential- -such as solidification and treatment involving materials like kiln dust and lime--will require the need for special measures to be considered. 7. The following techniques have been shown to be effective for the controlling of the generation and migration of dust during construction activities: 1. Applying water on haul roads. 2. Wetting equipment and excavation faces. http://www.dec.ny.gov/regulations/2620.html?showprintstyles 3/18/2010 I Fugitive Dust Suppression and Particulate Monitoring Program(TAGM-403 1) -NYS D... Page 4 of 4 3. Spraying water on buckets during excavation and dumping. 4. Hauling materials in properly tarped or watertight containers. 5. Restricting vehicle speeds to 10 mph. 6. Covering excavated areas and material after excavation activity ceases. 7. Reducing the excavation size and/or number of excavations. Experience has shown that utilizing the above-mentioned dust suppression techniques, within reason as not to create excess water which would result in unacceptable wet conditions,the chance of exceeding the 150 ug/m3 action level at hazardous waste site remediations is remote. Using atomizing sprays will prevent overly wet conditions, conserve water, and provide an effective means of suppressing the fugitive dust. 8. If the dust suppression techniques being utilized at the site do not lower particulates to an acceptable level (that is, below 150 ug/m3 and no visible dust),work must be suspended until appropriate corrective measures are approved to remedy the situation. Also, the evaluation of weather conditions will be necessary for proper fugitive dust control--when extreme wind conditions make dust control ineffective, as a last resort remedial actions may need to be suspended. j There may be situations that require fugitive dust suppression and particulate monitoring requirements with action levels more stringent than those provided above. Under some circumstances, the contaminant concentration and/or toxicity may require appropriate toxics_ monitoring to protect site personnel and the public.Additional integrated sampling and chemical analysis of the dust may also be in order. This must be evaluated when a health and safety plan is developed and when appropriate suppression and monitoring requirements are established for protection of health and the environment. i i i i i i i I i . � I i httn://www.dec,nv.a6v/reeulations/2620.html?showprintstvles 3/18/2010 '"Ovhb ATTACHMENT D Attachment D ?s pg� I i m cientic a Active, real-time, personal aerosol monitor/ data logger, With aerodynamic sizing i u K � I H v�M Key Features/Benefits The pDR-1500 was developed to meet a volumetric flow control and legacy pDR need for a fully integrated,active sam- nephelometry.An integrated sample True volumetric flow control pling personal scale instrument with filter enables post-gravimetric valida- • Interchangeable cyclones for higher greater accuracy, increased capabilities, tion of data. • low size and weight, maximum ease- accuracy cut points of-use and increased operating time. It Superior particle-cut points compared • Personal aerosol instrument with was designed for applications such as to those achievable using impactors benchtop performance site remediation,size discrimination, are delivered through volumetric flow • Full compensation for environmen- mass validation,exposure modeling, control and ACGIH traceable cyclones tal variables and protection of asthma patients. —available in pairs,for PM10 and PM4 • Flexible data logging routines or PM2.5 and PM1.A toroidal entrance I • Suitable for NIOSH Methods 0500 A lot gets in the way of accurately assures optimized aerosol aspiration and 0600 measuring aerosol concentration in and a representative sample even with- real-time—temperature, humidity,air out a cyclone. pressure and sample representation. The pDR-1500 handles all four—with relative humidity compensation,true Thernio Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific S C I E N T I F I Ci I i i MEMOS= To maintain optimal product performance,you need immediate access to experts worldwide,as well as priority status when your air quality equipment needs repair or replacement. Thermo Scientific offers comprehensive,flexible support solutions for all phases of the product life cycle. Through predictable,fixed-cost pricing,Thermo services help protect the return on investment (ROI)and total cost of ownership of your Thermo Scientific air quality products. i Concentration Measurement Range 0.001 to 400 mg/m3 range(auto ranging)' Scattered.Coefficient Range 1.5.x 10-6 to 0.6 m-1_(approx)@ lambda=880nm(not displayed) Precision/Repeatability Over 30 days ±2%of reading or±0.005 mg/m3,whichever is larger,for 1 second (2-sigma)2 averaging time ±0.5 of reading or±0.0015 mg/m3,whichever is larger,for 10 second averaging time ±0.2%of reading or±0.0005 mg/m3,whichever is larger,for 60 second averaging time Accuracy' +5%of reading+ recision(traceable_to SAE FineTestDust) — ° 9—P Resolution 0.1/°of reading or 0,001 mg/m ,whichever is larger Particle Size Range of Max.Response 0.1 to 10 pm_ Flow Rate Range. 1.0 to 3.5 liters/minute Aerodynamic Particle Cut-Point Range 1.0 to 10 Pm_ Concentration Display Updating Interval 1 second Concentration Display Averaging Time' 1 to 60 seconds(user selectable) Data logging Averaging Periods' 1 second to 1 hour Total#of Data Points That Can Be >500,000 Logged in Memory Number of Data Tags 99(maximum) Logged Data averaging concentration,temperature, RH,barometric pressure,time/date,and data point number Readout Display LCD 16 characters(4 mm height)x 2 lines Serial Interface USB/RS-232, 19,200 baud Computer Requirements IBM-PC compatible,486 or higher,Windows 950 or higher,>_8 MB memory, hard disc drive 3.5°floppy,VGA or higher resolution monitor Real Time Analog Signal 0 to 5V and 4 to 20 mA.Selectable full scale ranges of: 0-0.1,0-0.4,0-1.0,0-4.0,0,10,0-40,0-100,and 0-400 Internal Battery Run Time with Backlight off 4 AA alkaline,>24 hr run time,5 V peak-to-peak @ 1.2 L/min; >6 hour @ 3.5 L/min Run Time @25 deg C run time may vary with temperature Current Consumption 70 to 450 mA(in Run Mode);32 mA(in Ready Mode) Operation Environment -10°C to 50°C(14°F_to 122°F),_10 to 95%° RH, non-condensing Storage Environment -20°C to 70°C(-4°F to 158°F) Dimensions(max external) 181 mm(7,1 in)H X 143mm(5.6in)W x 84mm(3.3in)D Weight 1.2kg(41 oz) Notes: i 1.Referred to gravimetric calibration wtih SAE Fine(ISO Fine)test dust(mmd _2 to 3 Pm._g 2.5,as aerosolized) 2.At constant termperature and full,battery voltage 3.User selectable_ T1JV 4 This specification sheet is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice.Thermo Fisher Scientific makes no warranties,expressed or implied,in this product summary. � Mll Lit_pDB1500EID_2/08 I I Environmental 27 Forge Parkway +1 (866)282-0430 www.thermo.com/ih Instruments Franklin,MA 02038 USA +1 (508)520-1460 fax Air Quality Instruments i i '"Ovhb ATTACHMENT E Attachment E Stephen Kaplan Director of OHM Services Stephen is Director of Oil & Hazardous Materials and manages Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and remediation projects. He consults with private clients, lending institutions, legal counsel, and municipalities.As necessary he coordinates approvals, permitting, and remediation efforts with regulatory agencies. Stephen has performed Phase I/II investigations for communications facilities; residential, commercial, and industrial properties; and healthcare facilities. Alk OOA 23 years of professional experience Education Smithtown Concrete Site Study and Remediation, Smithtown, NY BA, Economics,State Stephen is managing the assessment and remediation for the residential redevelopment of a University of New York at 23-acre former concrete manufacturing site with municipal and private landfill. Based on the Geneseo, 1992 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed, VHB found contaminated soil related to a Registrations/ 10,000-gallon fuel oil tank, historic buried debris, and methane. Stephen is overseeing the UST Certifications removal plan, Health and Safety Plan, geophysical survey, groundwater, soil, soil vapor Asbestos Inspector (including landfill gas survey) and air sampling. He and his team are coordinating with New (Asbestos Inspection),2001 York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Suffolk County Department of OSHA Certified Hazardous Health Services. Waste Health and Safety Operator(OSHA 1910.120) Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn, NY (40 hour),2004 Stephen oversaw the design and implementation of a large-scale groundwater remediation OSHA Construction Safety system associated with a former leaking underground storage tank located at the Polytechnic and Health Certificate (10- Institute in Brooklyn. The groundwater remediation system is designed to collect and capture Hour),2012 contaminated groundwater and recover product floating on the groundwater table. Stephen coordinated with various additional team consultants in order to gather information needed to produce a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation-approved remedial action work plan inclusive of a Health and Safety Plan and Community Air Monitoring Program. Semi-annual soil vapor monitoring is ongoing as part of the approved Work Plan. T.C. Dunham Paint Company, Yonkers, NY Stephen provided consulting services including emergency response, and production and oversight of an approved remedial action work plan (RAWP) associated with a 4-alarm paint warehouse fire that impacted a large area in Yonkers. He teamed with various consultants and coordinated with various regulatory agencies, including the City of Yonkers, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the United States Environmental Protection Agency to generate various approved documents including a remedial action work plan, health and safety plan, and community air monitoring program plan. Remediation was conducted in accordance with the Work Plans prepared by Stephen and a no further action letter was obtained for the project. Verizon Wireless Phase I & Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, Various, NY Stephen has performed and overseen over one thousand Phase I and/or Phase II ESAs in the five boroughs and in various locations in New York for Verizon Wireless' service expansion. The Phase I ESAs include review of site information, health department and NYSDEC documentation, and visual inspections. He supports Phase H ESAs by preparing scopes of work and budgets, associated site-specific health and safety plans (HASPS), conducting soil and groundwater investigations.If soil or groundwater impacts are identified by these Phase H ESAs, Stephen also prepares soil and groundwater management plans (S/GWMPs)with thb Stephen Kaplan associated budget estimates, oversees the implementation of these S/GWMPs and prepares summary closeout reports. Long Island MacArthur Airport On-Call Environmental Consulting, Islip, NY Stephen was the Project Manager responsible for a three-year on-call agreement with the Town of Islip providing environmental consulting services. Monthly groundwater sampling was conducted at various locations of the airport property in accordance with the Town of Islip's NYSDEC SPDES compliance. Other consulting services include Phase I and Phase II investigations, permitting, underground storage tank investigations, wetlands investigations, and remediation. To accomplish the goals of each task order, Stephen responded quickly to requests and worked closely with the Town of Islip, Suffolk County, and the NYSDEC. Avalon Bay Great Neck Communities, Great Neck, NY Stephen oversaw the investigation and remediation services associated with for the former Commander Oil-Great Neck Facility in Great Neck, NY.VHB conducted Phase I and Phase H Environmental Site Assessment services on behalf of Avalon Bay Communities as part of due diligence for the redevelopment of the 3.49- acre parcel utilized as a Major Oil Storage Facility (MOSF) adjacent to Manhasset Bay. As part of its investigatory activities, VHB conducted geophysical investigations, installed soil borings and monitoring wells, completed a groundwater tidal effects study, wrote a Remedial Action Work Plan for submittal to NYSDEC. New York State Psychiatric Center Hospital Redevelopment Projects Phase I and II ESAs, Central Islip, Brentwood, Melville and Dover Knolls, NY Stephen coordinated site redevelopment issues with multiple parties following the initial Phase I and II ESAs at Central Islip. Coordination included working with County DOH, NYSDEC and the USEPA. Stephen's involvement with these projects included managing the removal of an electrical substation; remediation of PCB-contaminated soil;demolition of four out-of-service 500,000-gallon fuel oil ASTs; and remediation of fuel oil contamination.At one site, a soil management plan developed by Stephen addressed heavy metal and pesticide impacts at a former agricultural-use section.In addition, a portion of one former psychiatric center was developed as senior affordable housing which required that Stephen prepare various documents to satisfy HUD financing requirements. The Landmark Colony Phase II ESA, Staten Island, NY Stephen prepared a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan for the development of a 427,000-square-foot construction project.This property redevelopment is for a mixed-use commercial and residential active design community in Staten Island. Since the project site has hazardous materials from its previous institutional uses, Stephen developed the Work Plan to include asbestos and lead-based paint surveys, a geophysical survey, soil and groundwater sampling, as well as soil vapor sampling. He prepared a NYCDEP-approved Work Plan in accordance with the current City Environmental Quality Review Technical Manual for the NYCDEP to evaluate site conditions and response actions to be implemented during the site redevelopment. Taystee Bakery Phase I/II ESA, West Harlem, NY Stephen oversaw Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments for the redevelopment of a block of vacant buildings located in West Harlem that were formerly utilized as a bakery. As part of the Phase H ESA, a petroleum spill incident was identified, reported and closed by the NYSDEC. He and his team also created a Work Plan approved by the New York City Mayor's Office of Environmental Remediation (OER)for the required E-Designation investigation of the property. At Bryan Murty Senior Project Manager Bryan Murty manages and conducts Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments.In addition, Bryan performs various environmental services including soil vapor sampling/ambient air quality analysis, design, oversight and technical support of small and large-scale remediation projects, as well as noise studies. Bryan also participates in various environmental planning activities, f including preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. Education 11 years of professional experience BA, Environmental Sciences, United States Armed Forces Reserve Center/Nike Missile Base, Amityville, NY State University of New York at Binghamton,2005York Bryan performed Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments for the closure and redevelopment of the former United States Armed Forces Reserve Center and Nike Registrations/ Missile Base located in Amityville, New York. He evaluated all environmental conditions Certifications at the property including sub-slab soil vapor and ambient air quality analyses, multi- New York City Office of depth soil sampling, underground injection control (UIC), as well as groundwater and Environmental Remediation wastewater sampling within abandoned missile silos. ($50K) Gold Certified Professional (Brownfield Industry),2015 Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn, NY OSHA Certified Hazardous Bryan assisted in the design and implementation of a large-scale groundwater Waste Health and Safety remediation system associated with a former leaking underground storage tank located Operator(OSHA 1910.120), at the Polytechnic Institute in Brooklyn. The groundwater remediation system is 2006 designed to collect and capture contaminated groundwater and recover product OSHA Construction Safety floating on the groundwater table.In order to achieve this, Bryan coordinated with and Health Certificate(10- various additional team consultants in order to gather information needed to produce a Hour),2012 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation-approved remedial action work plan. ($50K) Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) Career Preparatory High School, Westbury, NY Bryan provided consulting services including a review of adjacent industrial and former Super-fund sites within the surrounding properties. Bryan also conducts sub-slab soil vapor and indoor air monitoring in accordance with New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) protocols in order to ensure surrounding industrial properties are not adversely affecting the school. ($25K) Taystee Bakery,West Harlem, NY Bryan performed Phase I and Phase H ESAs for the redevelopment of a block of vacant buildings located in West Harlem that were formerly utilized as a commercial bakery. Bryan also corresponded with the NYSDEC for closure of an on-site spill, and created a New York City Office of Environmental Remediation (NYCOER)-approved Work Plan for the remediation of the property that is scheduled to be implemented in the coming year. ($12K) The Riverwalk Redevelopment, Patchogue, NY Bryan assisted in the preparation of Phase I and Phase H Environmental Site Assessments, as well as the facility closure (including soil, groundwater, UIC analysis and Bryan Murty underground storage tank removal) of the former Clare Rose beverage distribution center in Patchogue, New York for redevelopment into market rate condominiums. Costco Redevelopment, Hicksville, NY Bryan prepared Phase I and Phase H Environmental Site Assessments and assisted in preparation of the revised FEIS for the redevelopment of the property at West John Street and Charlotte Avenue. New York City Phase I ESA Experience, New York, NY Bryan has prepared numerous Phase I Environmental Site Assessments throughout the five boroughs for such projects as the Tastyee Bakery Site near Columbia University,- Jewish niversity;Jewish Home Lifecare on the Upper West Side; 7 World Trade Center in Manhattan; Bossert Hotel in Brooklyn; Attorney Street in Manhattan; Park Lane Hotel,the former Helmsley Hotel, in Manhattan; and many others.As a result of the research for these projects and the coordination with environmental agencies, Bryan understands New York City environmental issues, the regulations governing these issues, and the remediation protocols. T.C. Dunham Paint Company,Yonkers, NY Bryan provided consulting services including emergency response, and production and oversight of an approved remedial action work plan associated with a 4-alarm paint warehouse fire that impacted a large area in Yonkers. He teamed with various consultants and coordinated with various regulatory agencies, including the City of Yonkers, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the United States Environmental Protection Agency to generate various approved documents including a remedial action work plan, health and safety plan (HASP) and community air monitoring program (CAMP) plan. Former Bay Shore Armory, Bay Shore, NY Bryan performed a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for the re-use and redevelopment of the former New York State Armory property. He coordinated with sub-contractors and provided field oversight for a geophysical survey,the sampling from several large leaching fields, abandoned underground structures including vehicle lifts,tanks and an oil/water separator. Queen of Peace Cemetery and Residential Subdivision, Old Westbury, NY Bryan prepared the FEIS for the development of a cemetery for the Diocese of Rockville Centre. Nassau Coliseum Redevelopment, Lighthouse at Long Island, Uniondale, NY Bryan assisted in preparation of the DGEIS for the redevelopment of the existing Nassau County Veterans Memorial Coliseum to a multi-use entertainment and residential complex in the Town of Hempstead. EIS for Heartland Town Square Redevelopment, Brentwood, NY Bryan assisted in preparation of the EIS for the rezoning and redevelopment of the 475± acre former Pilgrim Psychiatric Center as a Smart Growth Community. Bryan Murty Sheltair Aviation, Republic Airport, Farmingdale, NY Bryan assisted in preparation of the Hazardous Materials section of DEIS for proposed redevelopment and improvement of a former residential subdivision as a private jet terminal. Pulte Homes, Courthouse Commons, Central Islip, NY Bryan prepared Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and assisted in the monitoring of a large-scale remediation of a landfill at the former Central Islip Psychiatric Facility under the direction of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for the ultimate redevelopment of the property as a residential condominium complex. ($125K) Lowe's Home Centers, Various Nassau County and Suffolk County Sites, NY Bryan prepared Phase I and Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessments for several Lowe's stores throughout Long Island. Verizon Wireless Phase I& Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, Various Locations, NY Bryan has performed over 60 Phase I and/or Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) in the five boroughs and over 200 in various locations in New York for Verizon Wireless' service expansion. He supports Phase II ESAs by performing soil sampling, groundwater investigations/monitoring and soil vapor monitoring, and also provides remedial investigation support. PANYNJ Passenger Facility Charge, Newark, NJ, New York, NY, New Windsor, NY Bryan assisted in developing and administering the 2010 PFC application for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for Newark Liberty International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport, LaGuardia Airport and Stewart International Airport. This application includes $570 million in capital development projects that incorporate terminal expansion, runway and taxiway pavement rehabilitation and security enhancements. Working with Port Authority staff, assisted in developing each project description justification through detailed meetings with a variety of Port Authority staff (technical services, accounting, planning)throughout the agency. The application received considerable support by the airlines and worked diligently with Port Authority staff and the FAA to the eventual approval of the application. Country Point at Plainview, Plainview, NY Bryan conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on the former Nassau County Sanitorium and associated recreational playing fields in Plainview, New York. He used this information to provide integrated services and incorporated some into a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to analyze existing conditions, potential impacts and mitigation measures associated with the redevelopment of the former Nassau County Sanitorium to a multi-family residential subdivision.