Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMC KEIGHAN, VENETIAFRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York t 1971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 June 27, 1988 Ms. Venetia McKeighan 495 Bay View Ave. Rt. No. 2, Box 50A Southold, New York 11971 Re: 1000-52-5-23 Dear Ms. McKeighan: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on June 23, 1988 in regard to your request for a Waiver of the Wetland Ordinance for the construction of a deck on the second floor of your residence. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees Approve the request made by Venetia KcKeighan for a Waiver of the Wetland Ordinance for the construction of a 9' x 6' deck on the second floor of her residence located at 495 Bay View Avenue, Southold. Please be advised that there is a $25.00 fee for this waiver due at this time. Very truly yours, _ wski, Jr. Presi~ Board~ of Town Trustees FAK :ip cc: Bldg. Dept. file TELEPHON[! Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: June 22, 1988 Re: Wetland Application Recommendations The following recommendations were made by the CAC at meeting held Thursday, June 22, 1988: its regular No. 625 - Clifford Eginton Recommend disapproval. No majo~ need is shown, CAC suggests applicant revegetate the slight problem area. No. 628 - Anthony Panzarlno - CAC divided the application ~nto parts A and B. It recommends approval of Part A which is to repair existing deck; constuct a timber dock with a fixed elevated walk; hinged ramp; float; and construct an additon ot w/s of beach house. The CAC recommends disapproval of Part B which consists of a retaining wall with returns; backfilling; additions to existing wood decks; construct concrete pads on n/s of beach house. The CAC feels that the applicant has shown no need for the retaining wall and additional deck would be too close, and as a result wetlands would filled. The land is stable, further work would destroy wetlands. No. 629 - Linda Wilton- Recommend~disapproval. Property is wetlands. Check for possible violation. No. - Andrew and Bernice Lettieri Recoramend disapproval. Not enough space for prosposed project, presents a navigational hazard. Recommend approval of Waiver Requests of Henry Smith, Policano, George W. Bornschein, Venetia McKeighan and Jon Mulholland. Joseph May 17, 1988 Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Members of the Southold Town Board of Trustees, I am requesting a waiver from the Wetlands P~rmit~ Attached please find a map and the application that will explain the project and its location. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hail· 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516] 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK'FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDI NANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE AGENT PHONE NO LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANT D HOME ADDRESS Of PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRO~TING SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK LENGTH______~ / HEIGH.T ABOVE HIGH WATER DEPTH AT LOW TIDE AVERAGE RISE IN TiDE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL DiS~ANC~ ' FT. MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED PREMISE THE pROJECT S~ t E NECESSARY WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE pROPERTY, I E NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT. ARE iTHERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT ~qOULD PROttIBIT TIIIS PROJECT? ~ . IPROJECT LD, NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be corn :~ete(3 by Applicant or Project s ~onsor) S~ 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ~ / acres Ultimately ~) acres 8 WILL PROPOSEDD~'CTITION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes ~;/] No f No, scribe brletly 9. WHAT~ PRESENt LAND USa IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~os~dential ~ ~ndustrial ~ Commerma ~ Agriculture ~ ParklForestlO~en space ~ Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDD4G NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FBDERA STATE OR LOOAL)~ ~ Yes If yes, llst a~ency(s) and Dermitla~Dmvals ] 1.~DOES ANY ~SPEGT~P~F THE ACHON HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~ Yes ~o ff yes, fist aoency-- name and permit/ap~roval ~2, AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERHFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDFD ABOVE tS TRUE TO THE BEST OF btY KNOWLEDGE If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL A.c'~'~SMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE [ 'i'~IRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. ~ART 617.127 if yes, coor~l~nate me revmw process aha use the FULL BAF. [] Yes [] No WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.67 If NO, a negative declaratio~ may de superseded by another involved Agency. ] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: ~.nswers may be nandwntter., if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater euality or auantity, noise levels, ex~sting traffic patterns, solid wasze production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic. agricultural archaeological, historic, or other naturA~ or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals As officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. 05. Growth. subsequent developmenz, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term short term. cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-057 Explain briefly. C7, Other impacts (including changes in use of ei[ner quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. S THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes. explain briefly ':~ PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To De con* 3leted by Agency) INSTRUCTIO~q'§: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, ~mportant or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; tel geographic scope; and (f) magnitude, If necessary, add attachments or reference suDsornng materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail [o show that all relevant adverse impac[s have been identified'and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more Dotentially large or s~gnificant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the informetio~ and analysis above and any supporting ooct. mentation, that the proposed action WI LL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND PrOvide on attachments as necessary, the reasoqs supporting this determination; Dale r PROJECT LD. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only 3ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by APPlicant or Project sponsor) I APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality County 4. PRECISE LOCATION -Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.. or orovide mao~ 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT SRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres UItimately acres SEQR 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No if No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] !ndustdal [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] ParklForestlOpen space [] Other . Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) snd permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPF~OVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: Signature: if the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a~sessment OVER COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK SS: in completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees, agent ~r representative ~o enter onto--m~ propert~ to inspect the premises in conjunction with revi of t~~' p i t~on. S~NATUR'E~ ~'FyL ! ~AI~7 SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS EXAMINED COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85