Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7091 J -'F7d 9/- ©r- �b k-D RE' SPe4s M 0M 8EL"I f 0400 ,tai r fr P6R41 171-&t U&f- t5l3va Maio gd, L&C- 102 (9p0fis ea,s°f3 7 I?3ov meum A4,*,k L (a Stysp" Z, � Av, a-s� an h uah'���v1��r,� 'C c.,b /4w--r /o 43 CB } p rrru-b cis-, R--5=vub tzua�. -r6-Wl'1 of a Id Plum o f(l G d&L-4 /d2 ice: 5'��fs �� c5'pQec acl' use ry e+vi 1'p cW p4jol6luo1&o bpoled- tZlr ((& l )d ?-o! . a s Mel- � 9 b� S�e�.� xce h'� cw► at)14AI mew" C/L)b - �� 1 � `rh i spt i cW, is 4 � f" �cr2fo r��t � � CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED ( ) Tape this form to outside of file ( ) Pull ZBA copy of ND cQ o D > 0 ( ) Check file boxes for priors CD C �- ( ) Assign next number on list; '' N outside of file folder o N ( ) Date stamp entire original file number m -" -° ° n o W W ( ) Hole punch entire original . � � 0 0 (before sending to T.C.) rn v X o CD ( ) Create new index card v rnCD ZCnn N �D ( ) Print contact info &tape to � rn -< Q C" C: ( ) Ir Prepare transmittal to Towi Q o oC Q' oN � O ( ) Send original application wi o o to Town Clerk 0m ( ) Note inside file folder w/pri o N and tape to inside of folder CD ( ) Copy County Tax Map; highs m -n- neighbors and AG lots ' ( ) Make 7 copies and put wit t ( ) Do mailing label o ' 0 BOARD MEMBERS ®fs SO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �* y� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acamporat #it Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer 0 y� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l�''ro Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809 s Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ��� ��® MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21,2017 °� EP 2 5 z0 17 l��.v�.� ZBA FILE: # 7091 Southold Town Clerk NAME OF APPLICANT: Paul Pawlowski/Sports East PROPERTY LOCATION: 9300 NYS Route 25, Mattituck,NY SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property, located on the south side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) is a conforming 20.8 acre vacant residential parcel located in the R-80 Zoning District. The subject property has 600.96 feet-of frontage along NYS Route 25 and measures 1,964.93 feet along the easterly property line, adjacent to residential properties. The subject property measures 1,487.19 feet along the westerly property line and 577.68 feet along the southerly property line,both boundaries being adjacent to a horse farm. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for an interpretation, pursuant to Article XXVI, § 280-146D of the Town Code, in response to the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for, is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code Interpretation#6976; property located at: 9300 NYS Route 25, Mattituck,NY. SCTM# 1000-122-7-9. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests that the Zoning Board of Appeals overturn the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval and determine that the proposed Sports East Tennis and Sport Club meets the definition of a"Membership Club"which is a permitted use in an R-80 zoning district upon the issuance of a Special Exception Permit by the Board of Appeals . BACKGROUND: At the request of the Southold Town Planning Board for a code interpretation, pursuant to Article XXVI, Section 280-146 (D)1 of the Town Code,the Zoning Board of Appeals determined in ZBA File No. 6976 dated December 1,2016 that the proposed use set forth in the Site Plan Application of Sports East, as applied for, did not meet the definition of a"Club,Membership, Country or Golf," as defined in Section 280-4 Definitions of the Town Code Rather, Sports East met the definition of a"Recreational Facility"or"Recreational Facility Commercial." The applicant subsequently submitted an amended site plan by L.K.McLean Associates, PC dated February 2016 and floor plan by Jeffrey Sands,Architect dated March 24,2017,to the Board of Appeals,with an application for a Special Exception Permit for an annual Membership Club. This amended proposal was reviewed by the Southold Town Building Department which issued-a Notice of Disapproval on April 26, 2017 upon determining that the application, as applied for, was not a permitted use in the R80 Zone District. Consequently,the applicant and his attorney, in a letter dated May 12, 2017 to the Chairperson of the ZBA, appealed to the ZBA to overturn the Notice of Disapproval and determine that the current Page 2, September 21,2017 7091,Sports East Fitness Club SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 application for a Special Exception Permit, did qualify as a"Membership Club."The appeal was heard at a public hearing on August 3 2017. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The subject property is located in an R-80 Residential Zoning District which allows "Annual Membership Clubs"by Special Exception Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals,while a"Recreational Facility"or a"Commercial Recreational Facility"are not permitted uses in the R-80 Zoning District. Section 280-4 of the Town Code provides the following definitions: "Club, Membership or Country or Golf'- an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf,tennis, swimming, fishing, hunting or similar activities, but not including any form of aviation, outdoor trap, skeet or target shooting or motorboat racing. "Recreational Facilities"-Recreational uses characterized by predominately outdoor activities by patrons, including but not limited to stables and riding academies, regulation golf courses and golf-related activities,tennis and racquet sport clubs, platform sports, baseball batting and pitching cages and swimming pool facilities. It shall not include such activities as racing,jai alai and amusements parks. "Recreational Facility, Commercial"-An indoor or outdoor privately operated business involving playing fields, courts, arenas or halls designed to accommodate sports and recreational activities, such as billiards, bowling, dance halls, gymnasiums, health spas, skating rinks, shooting ranges,tennis courts and swimming pools PRIOR PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In ZBA code interpretation#6976 Sports East proposed a multi- sport membership club on a 20.8 acre parcel in the R-80 Zoning District consisting of an outdoor 330 ft. x 195 ft. synthetic soccer field, five outdoor tennis courts, 240 parking spaces and an 82,500 square foot two story building, as shown on a"sketch plan" by BBV Civil Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, dated November 16, 2015. Proposed activities inside the building included a soccer field, four tennis courts, a 5,000 square foot gym, locker rooms, bathrooms and showers, a multi-use volley basketball court, a rock wall, 2 classrooms for exercise classes, a kitchen, a 32-seat food service area, a pro shop, storage and 3 offices, and pre and after school child care for the children of members. CURRENT APPLICATION The applicant's current amended plans include the following proposed outdoor areas: 9 tennis courts totaling 64,800 square feet, an 87,500 square foot golf practice area, an exercise trail and 242 parking spaces. At the hearing the applicant testified that he is also proposing an outside swimming pool,though not shown on the submitted site plan. The proposed building is an 82,500 square foot single story structure. The interior of the building includes: a 3,500 sq. ft. adult gym, a 744 sq. ft. kids gym, a 3,500 sq. ft.pickleball court,two 1087 sq. ft. racquetball courts, a kitchen with a 32 seat food service area, a pro shop, 5 offices, reception, a 20,250 sq. ft. multi-use synthetic field that the applicant testified could be used for soccer or football, a 5074 sq. ft. multi-use sport court, a 3075 sq. ft. swimming pool, men's and women's locker rooms and bathrooms, and 4 tennis courts and storage areas with a combined area of approximately 11,500 sq. ft.All is shown on the floor plan by Jeff Sands Page 3, September 21,2017 7091, Sports East Fitness Club SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 Architect dated March 24, 2017 and labeled G001 and site plan by LK McLean Associates, Licensed Professional Engineer, labeled C4, and dated February 2016. It should be noted,that although it appears there have been revisions to the proposed use since the Building Department issued the Notice of Disapproval,the only issue before this Board is whether the proposed use as applied for to the Building Department meets the definition of a"Membership Club." Therefore,the Board determination must be based on whether the proposed use that was reviewed by the Building Department in issuing the Notice of Disapproval meets the definition of a"Membership Club." PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS: On August 3, 2017 the Board of Appeals held a public hearing to take testimony and other evidence related to the Building Inspector's determination that Sports East did not meet the definition of an annual membership club as defined in Section 280-4 of the town code. The Board first heard testimony from Sports East and its representatives and then from the members of the public. In support of Sports East's position that the project, as currently applied for, meets the definition of a "Membership Club,the applicant's attorney, Charles Cuddy, Esq., handed the Board Members a copy of town code section 280-4. Mr. Cuddy argued that the code should be interpreted using the strict rules of construction and that the use of the word "or" in the code meant that the special exception use could include other forms of annual memberships other than country,tennis, "or" golf. The owners of Sports East,Paul Pawlowski, Steve Marsh, and Joe Slovak also spoke on behalf of their proposed project. Most of their testimony discussed the merits of the proposed use and did not address the issue of whether the proposed use met the definition of a"Membership Club." Mr. Pawlowski, in addition to arguing the merits of the proposed use, also argued that the Board should find that the proposed used fit the definition of a"Membership Club"because it was essentially the same as that of the Laurel Links Country Club, which previously received a Special Exception Permit as a "Membership Club." The Board of Appeals issued a Special Exception Permit(Appl.No. 4264) on December 10, 1998 to Laurel Links Country Club on a 160 acre parcel ,the vast majority of which is dedicated to engaging in the sport of golf. Although the country club does have an accessory pool and tennis courts,they are also located outside. The country club does have a club house for accessory uses such as a dining facility, pro shop and locker rooms as well as a pool house. The remaining accessory structures are used for storage and maintenance equipment. However,the total square footage of all of the accessory buildings pales in comparison to the area used for golf. Furthermore, given the overall layout of the country club property and the activities conducted thereon, it is clear the Laurel Links Country Club is an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in the outdoor sport of golf. At the hearing the Chairperson of the ZBA asked the applicant's attorney if he knew of or could find and submit to the Board, examples where the Board granted a Special Exception for a"Membership Club" where the proposed Membership Club was not a golf course. On August 16, 2017 the ZBA received a letter from the attorney stating"I do not know of any." Many members of the public also spoke with regard to the project. Most, with few exceptions, addressed the merits or potential adverse impacts of the project instead of whether the application, as proposed,met the definition of a"Membership Club."Those who spoke in favor of the proposed project expressed the belief that there is a great need in the Town of Southold for the type of year `round sports activities being Page 4, September 21,2017 7091, Sports East Fitness Club SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 proposed by Sports East, especially for young people and seniors. Those who spoke in opposition to the project were concerned about the detrimental impacts of traffic, noise, and other problems a facility of this size would pose to the surrounding area, especially the adjacent residences to the east along Sigsbee Road. WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION: The Board also received numerous letters from the public, both in support and in opposition to the proposed project, At the end of the public hearing on August 3, 2017,the Board adjourned to the Special Meeting on August 17,2017 to accept additional written comments from the public and the applicant, at which time the hearing was closed. These letters are part of the Board's public record and,much like the verbal testimony described above, reflected support or opposition while failing to address the code interpretation that is the subject of this determination. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION 1. The limited issue before this Board is the Building Inspector's determination that the proposed Sports East does not meet definition of a"Club, Membership or Country or Golf'as set forth in section 280-4 of the Town Code and the ZBA's code interpretation decision# 6976 dated December 1, 2016. Whether the Board agrees that the proposed use would be a benefit to the community or that the proposed use might have negative impacts on the community is irrelevant to the issue before the Board and cannot play a role in the determination ultimately made by this Board. 2. The Board received testimony and written comments from the public both in support and in opposition to the proposed use. As stated above, most of the testimony and letters from the public in support of the proposed use focused on the need for such a facility in the Town of Southold and how it would be a benefit to the community. Those in opposition spoke of their concerns that the project would have a negative impact on the surrounding residential properties and on traffic in the area. Although this type of testimony would be persuasive in the Board's determination as to whether or not to grant a Special Exception Permit, it did little to address the limited issue before the Board. 3. The applicant compared the proposed Sports East to Laurel Links Country Club. The Board finds this comparison unpersuasive. According to Town records,Laurel Links Country Club is located on a 160 acre parcel,the vast majority of which is dedicated to engaging in the sport of golf. Although the country club does have an accessory pool and tennis courts,they are also located outside. The country club does have a club house for accessory uses such as a dining facility, pro shop and locker rooms as well as a pool house. The remaining accessory structures are used for storage and maintenance equipment. However,the total square footage of all of the accessory buildings pales in comparison to the area used for golf. Furthermore, given the overall layout of the country club property and the activities conducted thereon, it is clear the Laurel Links Country Club is an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in the outdoor sport of golf. 4. The same cannot be said of the use proposed by Sports East to build nine outdoor tennis courts, swimming pool, golf practice area and walking trail. The use of the outdoor courts,trails, swimming pool, and golf practice area will be limited by weather and daylight, while the indoor facility will be able to be used in all weather and at night. Additionally,while the outdoor activities will be limited to tennis, swimming, and golf, the vast majority of the activities proposed to be taking place at Sports East would occur inside the building, according to the applicant's testimony and architectural plans. The revised plans show a greater amount of exterior space dedicated to sports. However,based on the size and scale of the sports complex, it cannot be determined that the use proposed by Sports East is one that is being established for the Page 5, September 21,2017 7091, Sports East Fitness Club SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 "principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf,tennis, swimming, fishing,hunting or similar activities." 5. When examining Town Code definition for"Recreational Facilities"and"Recreational Facility, Commercial"the Board finds that the proposed use more closely meets the definition of a "Recreational Facility, Commercial"rather than a"Club,Membership or Country or Golf."As stated above, a"Recreational Facility, Commercial" is defined as "an indoor or outdoor privately operated business involving playing fields, courts, arenas or halls designed to accommodate sports and recreational activities, such as billiards,bowling, dance halls, gymnasiums, health spas, skating rinks, shooting ranges,tennis courts and swimming pools." A"Recreational Facility, Commercial"may contain numerous different activities and there is no requirement to engage primarily in a specific type of sport. This is exactly what Sports East has proposed; a privately owned facility that will contain different fields and courts that will accommodate various sports and recreational activities. 6. Based on the determination made herein,the Board will uphold the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Planamento, and duly carried to uphold the Building Inspector's determination: THE USE AS PROPOSED BY SPORTS EAST DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF A "CLUB,MEMBERSHIP OR COUNTRY OR GOLF"RATHER; THE PROPOSED USE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A"RECREATIONAL FACILITY, COMMERCIAL." Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Dantes, Planamento, Acampora (Member Goehrin recused). Thi Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). r Leslie Kanes eisman,tthairperson Approved for filing 7 /,7 ,?—/2016 _ ­­ - - n - ' ,y° DRAgy'O" _ 25, 141.34' Q J 1 6 " SIGN PAVEMENT a S' R� 600'9 CON °U BOX 4.8'w ° I // SIGN F I ,■r - 0",MBEs w SECTION 143 W OAR"EpD j BLOCK 1 LOT 1 < Im °" y REPUTED OWNER: ,��" E Pri�E� Z ' MAY & TONY INC. 5331 N ON U P I m 0" SIGN GN 0" MONUMENT — — FOUND W F /O 1 ZE 0.3 U Y �� FE \I f U E MONUMENT I FOUND j I 0.4'N I I ( I t ' SECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 4.1 I I { I 3 + I REPUTED OWNER: I I { { W MARGARET NOONE { I t { t ' II I r a'a cco-norj 143 W BLOCK 1 LOT 5 ! a4 REPUTED OWNER: + I SHED DEBRA TIMPONE 1 I 2.2'E ( 0.2'E SHED t I + , 0.5'E ! ( o W W ( ( U w m + Z e} SECTION 143 IFE I� 00 BLOCK 1 LOT 6 1 8.t'W a tV REPUTED OWNER: I { (AD ALFRED CILET71 JR. o rn ! I a°FE I { I { I ON FE — — I LINE 3.41 { CONC. 4.5'W BLDG. I II yP�� SECTION 143 { *34' BLOCK 1 LOT 7 I REPUTED OWNER: I I I 41 CONC ABRAHAM GARCIA & ' o.s'w SHARON RODRIGUEZ :: i w I CONC NJ *52' LIE m I I 1 I t � � 5.7'E U SECTION 143 ' BLOCK 1 LOT 8 I 1 t ' REPUTED OWNER: JAMES HINES t I \\ ! MONUMENT \ \\ FOUND WALL I \ \ 0.6'W w \\ \ FE J — — \\ \\ 0.7-W W I \ \\ 2 \\\\\\\ °8EW ° SECTION 143 \\ \\\ BLOCK 1 LOT 9 10 \\ \ REPUTED OWNER: WELL/PIPEDOREEN SIDOR MONUMENT sir — — 1 \ \\ FOUND I \ t t \ \ SECTION 143 STAKE FOUND BLOCK 1 LOT 10 ' + \ REPUTED OWNER: ti SOURAVLIS & ANNA ! t I I HRISOVALANTIS 1 I 1 r I f Y TRAILS Qe PATHS THROUGHOUT NOT SHO;k`1 < 1 Q 1Ao I { f� �� (NO BUILDINGS) - LU w i t � ' ��� �� WOOSECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 11 I � i I I l� i FE I o— REPUTED OWNER: _ f,/ 1 2'w MARY_BERNINGER O \ ! f W LL 6� J \\ \ 1 + FE Q 0 LLJx \ 1 + 0.5'W O — — ~ PIPE FE Q 0 \ \ I + FOUND ION LNF M 0 \\ \\ I 0.4'W I SECTION 144 0 LLI BLOCK 1 LOT 1 a IL \\ \\ { REPUTED OWNER: w \ \ I J. MORENO Q \ I PIPE \ I FOUND 1 I 0.6'w SECTION 144 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 I f21' REPUTED OWNER: I JOHN AND ' I POND MARGARET TONER I 1.3-W I I ' I { MONUMENT ROW 1 FOUND W SECTION 144 \ It BLOCK 1 LOT 3 II ` O REPUTED OWNER: w 0) JOHN AND ;V MARY FETZKO II I O N MONUMENT Fm W — — \\ \ + FOUND FE 0.3'E 1 ' { SECTION 144 W� BLOCK 1 LOT 4 \ � < REPUTED OWNER: LINDA D MULE I ► I I I FE ( 0.5'W { I j MONUMENT — — O ! i FOUND I SECTION 144 NOTES: I i I BLOCK 1 LOT 5.2 1. LOT AREA = 20.8211 ACRES. I I 1 I 1 I REPUTED OWNER: HOPE HERGRUETER 2. SUBSURFACE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT I + + + EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. I t t + MONUMENT — + I FOUND I I 1 I I it 1I I SECTION 144 OMTFED TO: / 1 I BLOCK 1 LOT 6.2 9300 ROUTF 9S,. INC_ t I FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC. of // !r REPUTED OWNER: FARM CREDIT EAST, ACA, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO 0 % J. SARNO FIRST PIONEER FARM CREDIT, ACA, IT'S SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS) I ' o i rf lal or r / LL, f ( SHED ILI a ! / I a l F ffc if D B OCKI I 144 LOT 7 1.5 E I I (<f REPUTED OWNER: + I I Q I SHED .8.E ELIZABETH CITTI t !tI Date By Revision I I - - I I o+t f SECTION 144 Surveyed by: P.F. Drafted by: A.V.R. Checked by: M.A.R. I t t ! '4+01 BLDG. BLOCK 1 LOT 8 •2'E REPUTED OWNER: Ba rrett I I t 1 I I 1 t DECK JAMES & VERA TAHENY _ _ 1 I I I FE Bonacci & t I I f *22' 1.2'E CD 0 Van Weele, PC I { ► t SECTION 144 BLOCK 1 LOT 9 Civil Engineers 175A Commerce Dr.,of REPUTED OWNER: NY 1 1788 ELIZABETH CASSIDY Surveyors Hauppauge,T 631 .435.1 11 1 MONUMENT FE Planners F 631 .435.1022 FOUND 111 0.WE www.bbvpc.com FE MONUMENT S 69031'00" W 577.68' �,1 0.8E FOUNSECTION 144 D BLOCK 1 LOT 1 o 0OWN .4E TAX LOT 8.9 Tax Map No.: DISTRICT 100 SECTION 122 BLOCK 7 LOT REPUTED OWNER: MEGA STYLE LLC REPUTED OWNER: Certifof proindperty acted on onifythamadelat in PROPERTY PAUL RENNER & of the property depicted hereon was mode in I MAUREEN ROCHE accordance with the existing Code of Practice for Land Surveyors adopted by the New York State SITUATE Association of Professional Land Surveyors. This certification is only for the lands depicted hereon 7,091 and is not certification of title,zoningfreedom LAUREL !�7 of encumbrances. Said certificationss shall run r ECET11rr only to the persons and/or entities listed hereon and are not transferable to additional persons, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. entities or subsequent owners. ZONING BOARD Or APPEALS Unauthorized alteration or addition to This survey SURVEY is a violation of Section 7209 of New York State Education Law Copies of this survey map not bearing the land surveyor's embossed seal and signature shall not be considered to be a true and valid copy © 2015 BBV PC The offsets or dimensions shown from structures to the property lines are for a specific purpose and use,and therefore,are not intended to guide in the erection of LM: SURVEY fences,retaining walls,pools,patios,planting areas,additions to buildings and any other construction. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined Date Scale Project No. Sheet No. VIEW: SURVEY or considered as a part of this survey.Easements,Rights-of-Way of record,if any,are not shown.Property corner monuments were not placed as a part of this survey. DECEMBER 30, 2014 11" = 60' A140502 of -w ao U� k a o O�`O (R°U25) - now 550' Al 30 Al 10 AN) D PU I o N R `�1 r_ �p ati , Al 40 9ti • ? x � I-xT EAST I E F\�j N N� Al 20 Al 00 UQ RILEY P AVENUE �7 o zKEY PLAIN ,* 5113.ECT � � m� i PARCEL a ROCHELLE oSARM Y PLACE vq In IMF REVIEWED BY ZBA G001 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN ROAI-x2 SEE DECISION # � B°UL G002 GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS, ADA DIAGRAMS pECONIC BAY EVARD to g DATED /7777 LI /� , A100 MEMBER CAFE, PRO SHOP, RACQUETBALL COURTS, KEY MAP 9 LOCKER ROOMS BATHROOMS RECEPTION FRONT N.T.S. 1 I f OFFICE -50 A110 --GYM AND KIDS GYM, PICKLEBALL COURT ov bb A120 SWIMMING POOL/ LOCKER ROOM AREA FLOOR PLAN A121 SWIMMING POOL/ LOCKER AREA CEILING PLAN l A130 OFFICES, MULTI-USE SPORT COURT A140 TENNIS COURTS, MULTI-USE SYNTHETIC FIELD, STORAGE 550'-0" 4 A200 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 40 -52 O EGRESSAl EGRESS O EGRESS A300 POOL AREA ELEVATIONS DOOR _ DOOR noon t A301 POOL AREA PHOTOMETRIC PLANS AND DATA A302 MISC BATHROOM/ WATERPROOFING DETAILS EGRESS O EGRESS OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE KIDS DOOR : 9'-0" 36'-0" 9'-0" 10'CLG 10'CLG 10'CLG 10'CLG GYM D 00R1 k 1 . , 1 . 1 _ NETTING ' HALLWAY 1 ----------------------------------- ------- ---------------------- GYM PICKLEBALL COURT SIN r IN I I 3,500 SQUARE Co 3 500 SQUARE co FEET FEET : u : uj: O MULTI-USE 50'-7" 50'-7" SPORT COURT L A H -1" CEILING lot1» 54 0 S4', 0" 90'_62» 902134 -71 54' 0" / 54' 0" - o _ 23'- „ 14>_7» PRO ; ---NETTING ;------�' ----------- ------------------------o ----------- 1 : ; HALLWAY I SHOP k� MULTI-USE _ -u.. � � o 5'-1„ P 5 -1" - � o SYNTHETIC 1 I 75'-0 _ _ LL, o ARCHITECT __ ___ ' N _4„ 14)-7)1 FIELD 40, JEFFREY SAND ARCHITECT _ 10' '-O" N 6 EVERGREEN LANE NNIS COURT #3 TENNIS COURT #2 TENNIS COURT #1 5.. I .6 WOMENS CEILIN� RACQUETBALL N EA HONST E 6 1.37 997942 TENNIS COURT #4 TE , 4 DEEP c o o T FAX 631.576.8916 � RECEPTION '' _ SWIMMING -------- ; NETTING ; ' ' J DRAWING TITLE - -------------------- .......... o NETTING--------�-- ¢ IN O C 13wX14h ------ --------------- .. .--•------•------- -- ------------------..... dM....... ._ � POOL ---- - � , ' ------------------=----------- 40 -4 __._____ ._. ___� .__.__... � OVERALL ' NETTING NETTING ' _______ OH DOOR zj a 10, a RACQUETBALL FLOOR EGRESS ' MENS CEILING COURTIn ' � N N PLAN DOOR N N ; ;----------; 10 CLG - STORAGE AREA STORAGE AREA N® _ ® OFFICE ---- PROJECT ---- 13X14h o 3 nE,�w n EGRESS SPORTS i DOOR O EGRESS OH DOOR DOOR EAST ENNIS AND SPORT 9300 MAIN ROAD �DM�cti% LAURAL,NEW YORK y � ScTl6"=1'_6" GA MAR 24-17 >♦( DRAWNG NUMBER 717NT.I�fG Ejo4P.D OF f\�'FEP',LS �c z' / Q 2789 � FaFtlG001 ti ----------------- - �1 PROPOSED ttttt\ CURB TRANSITION A. \\ttt V (SEE DETAILS)' , tt ^f+-ror,k.€ x• ^....., '€ f.�, " ... ai .. ;td 'i 3;',', i3 ,^'f,< ,t" .• ..�.,}, } ., .. , tt s..{. } .,.E,.9. .,/. f ' s .... , « , « ,", .• ., 3 �..5,,; `f'z ., >r ., ,:t ,...s _, £ <. .E .. ., " ,. s \t �y ["^z .wff € E 3"^. W,' # i" 1.,. <, , <., ...r�,,x I« , { R : ,✓. , Cy""","E.i I I I I I I ..:. t � • ,. .J ,.6 s Sia .". k./"Y .�, •Y r y ^,> '.x > s f . :.#s i r }'�.' !',' . , -. <, ,? .w s. s <.+ {{ r1' i , 08 9 v PROPOSED , . „ HANDICAP RAMP 'TYPE 1OB' 8a _ PROPOSED S33' 28' 25.97"E - ° .." HANDICAP t e, ,.y �'J\. PROPO RAMP N t k `' "BEGIN ONE 1652.84 PROPOSED WAY" SIGN 'TYPE 1' y�\ RIM 2' 5 "STOP" SIGN ' " BEGIN 70.0' R324.0' PROPOSED ONE 80.5' tt 1 ONLY "RIGHT TURN WAY . t 40Q r R3-5R ONLY" SIGN R6-6 PROPOSE�YND� R1-1 70.3 "DO NOT ENTER" " R � :::.'..:;,.....:•.:;.•:'. ..... ..... .... ... 1.6:,...<. ....".,.... •.... ... .,. ,, .. ,., .::".... .. .. -'R4.5'':.• 16'':�� 180.1 t t "..,. :............ ...... v' PROPOSED DO NOT 189.5 L 6.0 t \ 19 EXERCISE TRAIL t t y ENTERs Y t\ ` 214.5 R30.0 `R : 4`•l• f t t SEE SANITARY PLAN FOR t R5-1 t\ R2.0' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;R3': SYSTEM LAYOUT (STRUCTURES ; ? �`_ :1.0. • ' ':•': ":; NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY a'- .250.0 8.2 R302.0' ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSED R46.0 L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . n n \ t DO NOT ENTER i.", : ' :� a.``• • ; DO NOT tt t t • f 1 (may " .N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oPROPOSED . . . . . . . . . "RIGHT TURN 3 'f , ENTER n L 0 NLY SIGN o , .� 6.0 R3 .0 tt9 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 R5 1 t� 1 t 12 :.0 co I eLoc PRO0 P SED FULL t- c y N {� E t y,r DEPTH ASPHALT 1 ONLY ;:'' �1 4.'. x' i ocusr � � �2, SEE DETAILS t I� =1 (. %'P f ( TENNIS COURTS (. ) - -.1 50.0 Y ,1"r ," \`\ yJr, 0�,,` r f2Ti', In t 64,800 SF 5 t I: %,,;y PROPOSED �:�'d '' € f, to t t ', . . E tt ;'r :PROPOSED . PRACTICE AREA.-.HANDICAP RAMP ,,; g, ,.g r' o t" s;;' O ''77 77r` /1:Q' s TYPE 1 t B (87'4500 SF t \ o �'s 1 tt o 6.0 %R45, 0 \ P o 0 „,,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t �, ,. .a 26.0.' o0 7.0 o PROPOSED BUILDING >"tf; 346.4` N40' 31 34.06E t n± 8 0' _ �Y k4:5' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FIN. FLR. EL. 27.00 f ; , ( ) �, \t t PROPOSED •;�':'::';' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` St. : f� 4 +: T 600.96 :'f "STOP" SIGN R4';,•,... 82,500 SF :f t t & STOP BAR ,f }R 7 PROP OS.ED .BIKE 1 t\ 1 18.9. . . . tt fi• ;1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >- t t 4.5 f .. . 9 .0 0 t 4;''v /q 1 R1-1 ;d 1 • 'TYP' :9 ":1 s •)`'. 1� kY r" i • • , • • • • • , „ : : , 1fi .0 1(? I' { 't � ^f /I ti; f } /fs , 4'" S t ., •.,.. .,.. .,. .... 1.0.0.... : . & � f „ s OCU ., ..,. •. E £,., a„ a„ ran T„ £ /z ��...1',,. .{a, ,s" p 'f, f'i' ��k S { Ef'/ .• /Ni Fr y �} ; f 'f t , , f�. 3 r, f 2 ✓Y 4'V s �y 'f. R5. t' 10.0 �. c 180.0: .4 ,: >rz rf s/ "r \ ..., Y r, f E E. b R30' I i # �3• U : ` dq,, r. PROPOSED FULL r. r. 's.' `t' f,. e� t�, s E3 R30 a. .< >;>'Y {t;€ �, \ R150 DEPTH ASPHALT ; q SEE DETAILS tt 1141o 4DO ( ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tt cu 13.0 32.5' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING SIGN to 19 F: :; \ E :1:0 :10.4': -�T TO BE REMOVED t 3.0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a '%72 b. TEST HOLE t f` PROPOSED IM-2 .38 R 3 � _,,. «. ..,. .2._.13._2... _« „ LOCATION HANDICAP RAMP TYPE 1 & 4 R 3.0' ` 4 5 3 5 . ' . . EX. UTILITY POLE F30LE 36� 301.0' 133.5' a .' TO REMAIN N " W , 4" LOCus-r 8.7' 'w \\ PRO OSED HANDICAP AMP SED 0 PRO \\\ PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP � . . " - `_ "„ fy _....._. ..... .. ... ... . ... �" _ CURB TRANS TION \ 383 N (SEE DET LS) \ 'TYPE 1 OB' A `�\ t N33' 28' 25.94"W ' \\\ 0" LOC \\ P , 1487.19' O 0 - \�\ n SITE PLAN O I SCALE: 1"=60' NOTE: 0 LEGENDFOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q : 60 120 Feet DETAILS ALONG NYS ROUTE 25, SEE DRAWING Cti. u - - - - PROPERTY LINE " PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) o PROPOSED CRUSHED BLUESTONE PAVEMENT -o- PROPOSED 20' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE of (BETWEEN ROAD & MULTI-USE FIELD) o PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT --o-- PROPOSED 10' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE N (AROUND TENNIS COURTS) SITE DATA TABLE 0 1. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NUMBER(S) 1000-122-07-09 Ul WWW •� . •� PROPOSED PLAYGROUND TURF (BURKE OR APPV'D EQUAL) So-- PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT SAW CUT 2. ZONING CLASS R-80 (RESIDENCE) � •Y W W / 3. AREA OF SITE 20.82 ACRES (906,919.20 SF) Cn ® PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 4. INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY RECREATION PROPOSED MULCH 6. DATUM U.S.C. & G.S. OR T.O.B. U.S.C. & G.S./NAD83 (HORIZONTAL) & NAVD88 (VERTICAL) ❑❑ PROPOSED CROSSWALK 7. TOTAL INDOOR AREA 82,500 SF (1.89 Ac) PROPOSED SYNTHETIC FIELD TURF 8. TOTAL OUTDOOR SPACE FOR SPORTS 184,875 SF (4.24 Ac) PROPOSED HANDICAP PARKING ZONING COMPLIANCE TABLE ( R-80 RESIDENTIAL4-1 ) ° PROPOSED ACRYLIC COATED PAVEMENT ALLOWED (REQUIRED) PROVIDED MINIMUM LOT SIZE 80,000 SF 906,919.20 SF O PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 175 FT 577.68 FT U Q PROPOSED 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK Q❑ 5/9/17 LMY REPLACED MULTIUSE WITH 4 COURTS/2 PARK'G STALLS CFD / MAXIMUM BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 20% 181,393.42 SF 9.1% 82,500 SF MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA (F.A.R.) N/A 82,500 SF 12/7/16 MF ADDED GOLF PRACTICE AREA CFD LT D. : .o;� PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED CONC. APRON LANDSCAPED AREA N/A 6.3% (57,005 SF) 6/29/16 YCR AS PER COMMENTS FROM NYSDOT DATED 4/28/16 CFD/RGD MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES N/A 21.40% (194,000 SF) 3/9/16 LMY 24' WIDE WEST ENTRY/EXIT DRIVE & SIGNS CFD O' + + q� PROPOSED LIGHT POLE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK 60' 556'-11" + + PROPOSED TOPSOIL & SIEED DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY MINIMUM SIDE YARD 20' 213'-3" oREVISIONS PROPOSED TREE LIMIT ® PROPOSED PARKING STALL COUNT MINIMUM REAR YARD 75' 418'-11" MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35' 35' FT (38-40 FT RIDGE HT.) 9300 ROUTE 25, LAUREL N.Y. 11948 0 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB SUFFOLK COUNTY N E 0 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ° : 1 STALL PER 300 SF GFA SPORTS EAST ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP CLUB 0-) / ON-SITE PARKING REQUIRED -4- 51.484 SF/300 SF = 172 STALLS 5 STALLS PER COURT O 5 X 14 = 70 STALLS PROPOSED SITE PLAN TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 242 STALLS (/IE�� 1. �' d�� �� 0 HANDICAP STALLS REQUIRED. 7 STALLS ±3! o 7_OfVING BOARD OF ARPALS Q� �`� ` L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. N O STALLS PROVIDED: 234 + w CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 HANDICAP STALLS PROVIDED: +8 TOTAL STALLS: 242 a"C^�`" 1 \ Sheet No. ( t' .` Designed By: MF/CFD scale: AS NOTED TO Drawn By: MF Date: �� � FEBRUARY 2016 Approved By: RGD File No. 16029.000 DO5 �►0 5,\ MAILING ADDRESS: (--PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ®F SO(/ry P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ®V" old Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex J 11,7 Its PIERCE RAFFERTY G 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III '®l a (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR yCOUNTY,� Southold, NY �V Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtowirmy.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED MEMORANDUM JUL 212017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Donald J. Wilcenski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Date: July 27, 2017 Re: Request for Comments for ZBA#7091 Paul Pawlowski/Sports East Located at 9300 Route 25, Mattituck SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this application. It is the Planning Board's understanding that the subject appeal is essentially one for a code interpretation in that the applicant seeks to overturn the Building Department's denial in which it was determined that the proposed use was not permitted in the Zoning District. Since the issue has been thoroughly examined once before by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the request of the Planning Board, the Planning Board will not be providing any further comments. CHARLES R.CUDDY 99 ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailing Address: TEL: (631)369-8200 P.O.Box 1547 PAX. (631)369-908 Riverhead,NY 11901 August 16, 2017 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.W -yy�-7(29i Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson RECEIVED Zoning Board of Appeals AUG 16 2017 Southold Town PO Box 1179 —70NIlIG 60ARD OF APPEALS Southold,NY 11971 Re: Sports East Fitness Club-9300 Route 25,Mattituck,NY SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Dear Ms. Weisman: At the hearing you requested that I advise whether there is any approved membership club other than Laurel Links. I do not know of any other approved membership clubs, or for that matter, any other approved recreational use within the 'Town, other than Laurel Links. I do know that there are spas and exercise clubs throughout the Town without particular regard to zoning. I wish to again suggest that the proposed Sports East facility complies with the definition of a membership club. A membership club cannot be defined by extremes, rather by means. Following the definition and existing examples, as well as the particular language of the definition,the proposal by Sports East certainly qualifies as a membership club. I urge you to reach that conclusion. Very truly yours, CRC/pc Charles R. Cuddy ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Phone(631)765-18.09 (631)765-9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION RECEElE® Application No. Date Filed: MAY 12 201 ' TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK: ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL Applicant(s), S,G TS TfiST OggP/v�1i� ee-k . Parcel Location: House No. 300 Street 40,el e/ Ae Hamlet /1t��?uL Contact phone numbers: ys� 3 yg SCTM 1000 Section 2 7- Block�_Lot(s) Lot Size Zone District PCU hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE,ARTICLE��,SECTION ,SUBSECTION for the following uses and purposes: JQ �"7 l as shown on the attached survey/site plan drawn to scale.Site Plan review[ j IS or[ ]IS NOT required. A. Statement of Ownership and Interest: ��sG ZA.y.l.` is(are)the owner(s)of property known and referred. to as '300 loo7fy �!� -P?A17 77,C_4 - (House No.,Street,Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000,'Section 17-2- ,Block_ ,Lot ,and shown on the attached deed. The above-described property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefore in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: J C. The property which is subject of this application is zoned and is consistent [ ] _ with the use(s)described in the CO(attach copy),or [ ]is not consistent with the CO being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): [ ]is vacant land. , COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: STATE OF NEW YORK) *b (Si ature) Sworn to before me this day of N47" ,20 f f (Notary ) CHARLES R. CUDDY, Notary Public, State of New York No 02CU5872225 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires December 31 as B� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK RECEIVED Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION MAY 12 2017 Application No. Date ENNG BOARD OF APPEAL$ Page 2 General Standards,please answer the following as it pertains to your project: A. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: B. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: sP c "0" c C. The safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by,the proposed use and its location BECAUSE: D. The use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of Chapter 280-142 BECAUSE _ E. The use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general,particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance BECAUSE: + F. All proposed structures, equipment, and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection BECAUSE: �e_5 its we ;Mcg eaz�-e S �►-�c-�> omss avrn,� �`^WAl"IA,16" A"W 1, . G. The proposal shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 236, Stormwater Management BECAUSE: General Standards: A. Properties directly east and west of this site are in the General Business District. Adjacent properties will be buffered and a substantial part of this parcel will be preserved. B. As a result of a substantial buffer and preserved area the residential uses adjoining this site will be minimally impacted. Permitted or established uses in the adjacent General Business District should not be disturbed by a sport uses confined to the interior of the subject parcel. C. The interior use of this 20 acre parcel to conduct athletic activities will not adversely affect the safety,health,welfare, comfort,convenience or order of the Town in that the impact of the activities is confined to the interior of the parcel. Traffic engineers have indicated that all vehicles entering and exiting this site can be accommodated by the Main Road(NYS Rte. 25). D. The use, in its entirety and in its location is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the Southold Town Zoning Code in that it makes appropriate use of a site for the benefit of a large segment of the Community. E. This 20 acre site is sufficient for the proposed use in that more than '/z of the site will be preserved and the use will not directly impact the residential neighbors to the east. The neighborhood directly to the east and west is zoned General Business permitting more intense uses. However,the visibility scale and overall appearance will be screened from public view. NG Of Plppe Z®�I 4FF17vq ) Question A The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use to adjacent properties because it is directly off the main road, will not interfere with any adjacent properties in a negative way. If fact with the approved DOT site plans and road plans it will help all adjacent properties Question B The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district and adjacent properties because it will enhance the commercial adjacent properties and will not interfere with any residential properties. Question C The safety, health, welfare, comfort and convenience or order of our town will not be effected it will be improved by adding a turning lane, property sidewalks and curbs and is in the widest part of the roadway in the town. All of which is approved by the DOT. It will also improve the overall health of our community by offering a healthy alternative that is lacking Question D The use will be in harmony and the purposes of 280-142 because it will be a private membership club,will not need and variances, will exceed the code and planning dept. setbacks and overall density buildout. Question E The use will be compatible to surrounding area with character of the community because it will look visibly the same as all newer barns within our town, have a large amount of green space and undisturbed space surrounding the property, was already approved by the ARB. It will match the scale in the immediate area and is well under what is allowed by code as for structure on that property RECEIVED MAY 1 9 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS .. 1 RECEIVED ���j��'I��`�,�` �!�'�� tl�i►l,� �'II��''_ ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL '� A- ONMIC011 PASsm W - ? - - ix,i�dr,l7�7� qp �y q,,q -c �,?, �• IH_JT'1f{`d lu °.r$ ��U IlfftQ�j i{�u 'f!�{i itFk�i���fL"�L�i�',' 1 t i Ora,�'��I�P�I��s,�ry���'�, ell mnwc W do v4dua do the do ow,, .T APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: Date Prepared: I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: H. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): RECEIVE® Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: PEALS Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): _�R ZONING A Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: #flop j III. Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alt Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing.square footage of buildings on your property: d Proposed increase of building coverage: 2r 2 . Square footage of your lot: o y Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: • V. Purpose of New Construction: _ 7b PiQD v Ir ecce VI. Please describe the land contours(flat,slope%,heavily wooded,marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Ddu ,wlw AST .vzc- Cie Please submit seven (7) photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 k 011vol 1 QUESTIONNAIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION 1. Has a determination been made regarding Site Plan review? Yes '5< No If no,please inquiry-with the ZBA office and if site plan is required,you may apply to the Planning Dept at the same time so both applications can be reviewed concurrently. 2. Are there an posals to change or alter land contours? a. o Yes please explain on attached sheet. 3. Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? /�O a. 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? b. 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? ,f/,0 c. 4.)Ifyo property r perry contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. 4. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? y® 5. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on 'then survey that you are submitting? X(9 . Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or'state none on the above line. 6. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? //O If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit end survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: /✓ At 7. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to obtain copies of them. 8. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey, 9. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel��,�2�J�LyT� and the proposed use '(ex:existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other or vacant proposed office with apartments above,etc.) orized sign a and Date RECEIVED MAY I � Z017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ,O/M May 8th 2017 RECEIVED Zoning Board of Appeals MAY 12 2017 Re: Sports East ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS J Please note the enclosed packet, site plan, floorplan have been updated Here is the list of the following changes BUILDING SIZE IS 82,500 SQ FT AND NOT 144,000 INCREASED THE EXTERIOR PRIVATE SPORT COURTS AND PRACTICE AREAS TO 180,000 PLUS SQ FEET WE REDUCED THE PRIVATE GYM FROM 7000 TO 3500 SQ FEET THE FOOD SERVICE AREA FOR OUR MEMBERS WILL BE 32 SEATS WE REMOVED THE EXTERIOR SOCCER FIELD AND ADDED TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TENNIS COURTS FROM 5 TO 9 FOR OUR MEMBERS WE HAVE PROVIDED PARKING THAT IS REQUIRED VERSES ANY ADDITONAL WE REPLACED THE INTERIOR BASKETBALL COURT WITH A PICKLE BALL COURT FOR OUR MEMBERS ALONG WITH ADDING RACKET BALL COURTS WE REMOVED BATTING CAGES, ROCK WALL, BASKETBALL COURT CHARLES R.CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW l� MAY D 445 GRIFFING AVENUE 1 ` 2017 RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK 8 _d r?DI 1 Mailing Address: 'I'07(631)369-8200 P.O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 May 12, 2017 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.com Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Sports.East Private Membership Club-9300 Route 25, Mattituck,NY SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Dear Ms. Weisman: Enclosed, on behalf of Sports East Private Membership Club, is an original and eight(8) copies of the following documents: 1.Application 2. Questionnaire 3. Agricultural Data Statement 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form 5. Transactional Disclosure Form 6. LWRP Consistency Form 7. Photo simulations 8. Zoning Board of Appeals decision dated 12/2/2016 9. Floor plan 10. Survey 11. Site plan The application is submitted in response to the Building Department's denial dated April 26, 2017, a copy of which is enclosed. Pursuant to a discussion with the Town Attorney the applicant requests the Board to determine the use proposed is a membership club meeting the.requirements of Section 280- 13(B)(7). This is not a special exception request, rather it is a request for an interpretation. You will note the present application is in marked contract to an earlier application,both as to proposed uses and area utilized. The salient differences are noted on a separate page attached to the application. With an increased outdoor area,reduced indoor space and emphasis basically on two sports,we submit that the application complies with the Town Code and reflects adherence to the standards of the Board's decision dated December 2, 2016. The applicant was surprised and disappointed with the improvident denial by the Building Department coupled with the unexplained return of the application. Nevertheless, based upon the Building Department's denial the applicant appeals and submits this application to permit the Board.to-hold a hearing and determine that, as proposed,the applicant is an annual membership club. You have returned the applicant's check previously submitted. It should be applied to this application. We look forward to your advise that this matter has been scheduled for a hearing. Very truly yours, ez � CRC:ik Charles R. Cuddy Enclosures i BOARD MEMBERSSouthold Town Hall D Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®� SOUTHp�O 53095 Main Road�P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes [ Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �p `�� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider �yCow, Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS R CEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD l=a'1fq, Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 EC - 216� FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION d. MEETING OF DECEMBER 1,2016 S thotd Townet4VED ZBA FILE: #6976, Code Interpretation mg 20�� NAME OF APPLICANT: Southold Town Planning Board PROPERTY LOCATION: 9300 NYS Route 25,Mattituck,NY SCTM No. 1000-12WJ9G BOARD of APPEALS PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property, located on the south side of Main Road(NYS Route 25)is a conforming 20.8 acre vacant residential parcel located in the R- 80 Zoning District. The subject property has 600.96 feet of frontage along NYS Route 25 and measures 1,964.93 feet along the easterly property line, adjacent to residential properties. The subject property measures 1,487,19 feet along the westerly property line and 577.68 feet along the southerly property line,both boundaries being adjacent to a horse farm. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The Southold Town Planning Board has requested that the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals make a determination,pursuant to Article XXVI, § 280-146 (D)(1) of the Town Code,as to whether the use set forth in the Site Plan Application of Sports East, as applied for,meets the definition of a"Club,Membership, Country or Golf'as defined in § 280-4 Definitions of the Town Code or whether the proposed project meets the definition of a different use, such as a"Recreational Facility" or a"Commercial Recreational Facility". BACKGROUND: The Board of Appeals received a memorandum dated May 31,2016 from Southold Town Planning Director,Heather Lanza,written on behalf of the Planning Board, related to an application that was pending before the Planning Board in which the applicant, Sports East,was seeking site plan approval for an"Annual Membership Club"for property located at 9300 New York State Route 25 in Mattituck(hereinafter referred to as"the subject property"). The subject property is located in an R-80 Residential Zoning District which allows "Annual Membership Clubs"by Special Exception Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, while a"Recreational Facility"or a"Commercial Recreational Facility" are not permitted uses in the R-80 Zoning District. Section 280-4 of the Town Code provides the following definitions: "Club,Membership or Country or Golf'- an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf,tennis, 04 C - Page 2,December 1,2016 #6976,Town of Southold Planning Board—(Sports East Fitness Club) SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 swimming,fishing,hunting or similar activities,but not including any form of aviation, outdoor trap, skeet or target shooting or motorboat racing. "Recreational Facilities"-Recreational uses characterized by predominately outdoor activities by patrons, including but not limited to stables and riding academies,regulation golf courses and golf-related activities,tennis and racquet sport clubs,platform sports,baseball batting and pitching cages and swimming pool facilities. It shall not include such %�� I activities as racing,jai alai and amusements parks. "Recreational Facility, Commercial"-An indoor or outdoor privately operated business involving playing fields, courts, arenas or halls designed RECEIVED to accommodate sports and recreational activities, such as billiards, bowling,dance halls, gymnasiums,health spas, skating rinks, shooting MAY 12 2017 ranges,tennis courts and swimming pools ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS In addition to the above-referenced application before the Planning Board, Sports East had previously made an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Exception Permit (ZBA# 6914 SE) as required pursuant to § 280- 13 (B)(7), for an"Annual Membership Club" that is proposed to be located in an R-80 Residential Zoning District, This Board conducted a public hearing on that application on February 4, 2016 which was adjourned without a date subject to a SEQRA determination by the Planning Board,who assumed lead agency. Several months after the public hearing for the Special Exception Permit was held, Sports East completed its application to the Planning Board for site plan approval. Upon receipt of a completed application for site plan approval,the Planning Board scheduled and then held a public hearing on the site plan application on May 2,2016. At a Planning Board work session prior to a Regular Meeting,the Planning Board indicated that it was going to issue a"positive declaration"for the project under the State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)as lead agency. At the Regular Meeting that followed, and subsequent to the Planning Board's request to this Board on May 31,2016 for the aforementioned code interpretation,Sports East formally, on the record,withdrew its application for site plan approval, and the resolution adopting the positive declaration was not acted on by the Planning Board. The applicant did not withdraw his application for a Special Exception Permit,still pending before this Board.However,this Board is legally prohibited from rendering a final determination on the latter application without the Planning Board's SEQRA determination. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sports East has proposed a multi-sport membership club on a 20.8 acre parcel in the R-80 Zoning District consisting of an outdoor 330 ft. x 195 ft. synthetic soccer field, five outdoor tennis courts,240 parking spaces and an 82,500 square foot two story building, as shown on a"sketch plan"by BBV Civil Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, dated November 16,2015. Proposed activities inside the building include a soccer field, four tennis courts, a 5,000 square foot gym, locker rooms,bathrooms and showers, a multi-use volley/basketball court, a rock wall, 2 classrooms for exercise classes, a kitchen, a 32-seat food Page 3,December 1,2016 lv V(ECEIVEI) #6976,Town of Southold Planning Board—(Sports East Fitness Club) SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 MAY 2 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS service area, a pro shop, storage and 3 offices, and pre and after school child care for the children of members. PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS: On October 6,2016 the Board of Appeals held a public hearing to take testimony and other evidence related to the Planning Board's request for an interpretation as to whether the use as proposed by the applicant constituted a"Membership Club" as defined by section 280-4 of the Town Code. The Board first heard testimony from Sports East and its representatives and then from the members of the public. At the beginning of the hearing,the Chairperson of the Board read a description of the proposed project including an 82,500 square foot 2 story building. When asked for confirmation that this description was accurate,Paul Pawlowski, a principal of Sports East, stated that the application before the Planning Board was now for a single story 140,000 square foot building. Sports East,in support of its position that the proposed development met the definition of a "Membership Club"presented Joseph Pfaff,the general manager of Laurel Links Country Club and Fred Markham a real estate agent with Daniel Gale Sotheby in Cutchogue. Mr.Pfaff testified that Laurel Links received a Special Exception Permit from this Board that, in addition to the outdoor golf course, outdoor tennis court, and outdoor pool, included the country club building that contains a dining facility, locker rooms, pro shop and a pool house. Mr. Pfaff further opined that the proposed Sports East development was a use"very similar"to that of Laurel Links. Mr. Markham stated that he has followed this project for some time and to his knowledge there are no parcels located in a business district for sale within the Town of Southold that-could accommodate the uses proposed by Sports East. Paul Pawlowski also spoke on behalf of Sports East. Much of the testimony by Mr. Pawlowski did not address the issue of whether the proposed use met the definition of a"Membership Club." Rather,Mr. Pawlowski spoke of the process Sports East had engaged in and the merits and impacts of the proposed development. Mr.Pawlowski started his testimony by stating that he believed the role of the Zoning Board of Appeals was to improve the quality of life of the community, and that the Board could do so by determining that the project met the definition of a "Membership Club." Next, Mr. Pawlowski discussed his meeting with the Building Department and Planning Department staff and the process of going through the public hearings before this Board and the Planning Board. Mr. Pawlowski then discussed the merits of the application, stating that the project would not require any variances,and includes proposed buffers from residential properties, drainage that will prevent runoff,and a state of the art efficient septic system. Moreover,the project would encourage families to remain in the area;was consistent with the Town's Draft Comprehensive Plan, and was approved by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The only statement by Mr. Pawlowski that addressed whether the project,as proposed, met the definition of a"Membership Club"was his belief that since most of the sports proposed to be played indoors could also be played outdoors,the project satisfied the definition of a"Membership Club." ji Page 4,December 1,2016 ' I �f� RECEIVED #6976,Town of Southold Planning Board—(Sports East Fitness Club) MAY 12 2017 SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Many members of the public also spoke with regard to the project. Most, with few exceptions, addressed the merits or potential adverse impacts of the project instead of whether the application, as proposed, met the definition of a"Membership Club."Those who spoke in favor of the proposed project expressed the belief that there is a great need in the Town of Southold for the type of year `round sports activities being proposed by Sports East, especially for young people and seniors. Those who spoke in opposition to the project were concerned about the detrimental impacts of traffic,noise, and other problems a facility of this size would pose to the surrounding area. Charles Cuddy,Esq., attorney for Sports East, spoke at various times throughout the hearing. Initially,Mr. Cuddy argued that the Board did not have the jurisdiction to make the requested determination. With regard to whether the use as proposed met the definition of a"Membership Club,"Mr. Cuddy's argument to the Board did not focus on the various definitions in the code. Rather, Mr. Cuddy focused on the various use regulations for different zoning districts and essentially argued that based on the use regulations,the use as proposed would not be allowed in other zoning districts that allow"Recreational Facilities"or"Commercial Recreational Facilities."He also opined that there were insufficient lots available in other zoning districts to accommodate the project as proposed. Mr. Cuddy argued that the proposed use was a hybrid, combining activities that are included in what the Town Code defines as a"Membership Club," and what is allowed in the zoning districts that permit"Recreational Facilities,"or"Commercial Recreational Facilities."Therefore,he concluded that the Board should find that the proposed use meets the definition of a"Membership Club." WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION: The Board also received numerous letters from the public, both in support and in opposition to the proposed project,At the end of the public hearing on October 6, 2016,the Board adjourned to the Special Meeting on October 20, 2016 to accept additional written comments from the public and applicant, at which time the hearing was closed. These letters are part of the Board's public record and,much like the verbal testimony described above, reflected support or opposition while failing to address the code interpretation that is the subject of this determination. LEGISLATIVE INTENT: The Board of Appeals reviewed the transcripts of the Southold Town Board's public hearings on November 24, 1998, and December 8, 1998,in relation to amendments to the definition of"Club, Membership or Country or Golf Course."No comments from the public or Board members are on record. The preamble states "WHEREAS the intent of the local law is to permit any entity,not just a not-for-profit corporation to own/operate a golf club and to remove pubic golf courses as a permitted use (by special exception)." Local Law No. 26-1998, amending Article I, Section 100-3 (Definitions) and Article III Section 100-31 (Use Regulations) accordingly,was adopted by unanimous resolution of the Town Board on December 8, 1998. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION 1. The limited issue before this Board is the Planning Board's request for a determination as to whether the use proposed by Sports East meets the definition of a"Club, M1 Page 5,December 1,2016 f / l q #6976 Town of Southold Planning Boar —(Sports Fitness fiess Club) SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 Membership or Country or Golf'as set forth in section 280-4 of the Town Code. Whether the Board agrees that the proposed use would be a benefit to the community or that the proposed use might have negative impacts on the community is irrelevant to the issue before the Board and cannot play a role in the determination ultimately made by this Board. 2. The Board received passionate testimony and written comments from the public both in support and in opposition to the proposed use. As stated above,most of the testimony and letters from the public in support of the proposed use focused on the need for such a facility in the Town of Southold and how it would be a benefit to the community.Those in opposition spoke of their concerns that the project would have a negative impact on the surrounding residential properties and on traffic in the area. Although this type of testimony would be persuasive in the Board's determination as to whether or not to grant a Special Exception Permit,it did little to address the limited issue before the Board in this code interpretation. 3. The testimony of those representing and appearing on behalf of Sports East also in large part failed to address the issue before the Board. Mr. Markham,a real estate agent, testified that,to his knowledge,there are no parcels within the Town of Southold in a business district that could accommodate the proposed use.However,he failed to address the issue before the Board. While such testimony may be persuasive in deciding whether a hardship use variance should be granted or whether the zoning of a certain parcel should be changed, it is irrelevant as to the limited issue of whether the proposed use meets the definition of a"Membership Club"as currently defined in the Town Code. Similarly, Mr. Pawlowski's testimony, although relevant as to a whether a Special Exception Permit should be granted or to a Board charged with making a SEQRA determination, was largely irrelevant as to the issue before this Board. The only relevant testimony offered by Mr. Pawlowski was that since the sports that were going to be played inside could also be played outside,the use should be considered a"Membership Club." 4. Mr. Pfaff,the general manager of Laurel Links Country Club,also testified on behalf of Sports East. His relevant testimony was that he believed the use proposed by Sports East was similar to that of the Laurel Links Country Club,and therefore the proposed use should be considered a"Membership Club." The Board finds this comparison unpersuasive. According to Town records,Laurel Links Country Club is located on a 154 acre parcel,the vast majority of which is dedicated to engaging in the sport of golf. Although the country club does have an accessory pool and tennis courts,they are also located outside. The country club does have a club house for accessory uses such as a dining facility,pro shop and locker rooms as well as a pool house. The remaining accessory structures are used for storage and maintenance equipment. However,the total square footage of all of the accessory buildings pales in comparison to the area used for golf. Furthermore, given the overall layout of the country club property and the activities conducted thereon, it is clear the Laurel Links Country Club is an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in the outdoor sport of golf. 5. The same cannot be said of the use proposed by Sports East to build 5 outdoor tennis courts and an outdoor soccer field. A regulation tennis court is 78 feet long and 36 feet wide for a total square footage of 2,808 square feet and therefore five tennis courts would RECEIVED MAY 12 2097 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED oil Page 6,December 1,2016 1 MAY 2 2017 #6976,Town of Southold Planning Board—(Sports East Fitness Club) SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS cover 14,040 square feet. The average size of a soccer field is 54,000 square feet. Therefore,the Sports East proposal dedicates 68, 040 square feet for the playing of sports outside and,according to the testimony of Mr.Pawlowski,proposes 140,000 square feet for indoor activities,which is more than twice the size of the area dedicated to outdoor sports. (The site plan application originally submitted to the Planning Board and the Special Exception Permit application submitted to the ZBA by Sports East proposed an 82,500 sq. ft. building, which is still larger than the area proposed for outdoor sports). The use of the outdoor courts and field will be limited by weather and daylight,while the indoor facility will be able to be used in all weather and at night.Additionally,while the outdoor activities will be limited to tennis and soccer,the vast majority of the activities proposed to be taking place at Sports East would occur inside the building, according to the applicant's testimony and architectural plans Based on the foregoing,it cannot be determined that the use proposed by Sports East is one that is being established for the "principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf,tennis, swimming,fishing, hunting or similar activities." In fact, Sports East conceded as much at the public hearing and described its proposed use as a"hybrid"of different uses. 6. The Board finds the proposition unpersuasive that the proposed use meets the definition of a"Membership Club"because many of the sports that are proposed to be played indoors could be played outdoors. If the only relevant definition in section 280-4 was "Club,Membership or Country or Golf'that argument may be more compelling. However,when examining the other relevant definitions, "Recreational Facilities"and "Recreational Facility, Commercial"the Board finds that the proposed use more closely meets the definition of a"Recreational Facility, Commercial"rather than a"Club, Membership or Country or Golf."As stated above, a"Recreational Facility, Commercial" is defined as "an indoor or outdoor privately operated business involving playing fields, courts, arenas or halls designed to accommodate sports and recreational activities, such as billiards, bowling, dance halls, gymnasiums,health spas, skating rinks, shooting ranges, tennis courts and swimming pools." A"Recreational Facility, Commercial"may contain numerous different activities and there is no requirement to engage primarily in a specific type of sport. This is exactly what Sports East has proposed; a privately owned facility that will contain different fields and courts that will accommodate various sports and recreational activities. 7. Based on the determination made herein,the Board will be unable to approve Sports East's application for a Special Exception Permit as proposed. However,the Board notes that Sports East does have options that it may pursue. Among other things, Sports East may amend its application to meet the definition of a"Membership Club" or it may pursue a change of zone to that of a zoning district that will allow the proposed use. 8. Section 280-146 D)(1) of the Town Code states that the Zoning Board of Appeals may determine the meaning of any provision contained in Chapter 280 upon the request of any Town officer,board or agency. Therefore,the Board finds that,pursuant to Section 280- 146(D)(1), the Board has jurisdiction to make the interpretation requested by the Planning Board as to whether the use proposed by Sports East met the definition of a "Club,Membership or Country or Golf." Page 7,December 1,2016 #6976,Town of Southold Planning Board—(Sports East Fitness Club) SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors,motion was offered by Member Weisman(Chairperson), seconded by Member Schneider,and duly carried to determine that: THE USE AS PROPOSED BY SPORTS EAST DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF A"CLUB,MEMBERSHIP OR COUNTRY OR GOLF"RATHER; THE PROPOSED USE MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A"RECREATIONAL FACILITY, COMMERCIAL." Vote of the Board.- Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Dantes, Horning, Schneider (Member Goehringer re sed). This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). r Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing A / a /2016 RECEIVED MAY 12 2097 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGRICULTURAL DATA.STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL_ S -TOWN OF SOUTHOLD • .WHEN 7"0 M9 im' FORM: The forret must be cowpleted by'tke applicaiiffor any special-use'penW4 site i16t_approval,'iis8 varian=ce, or subdivision-approval on property within an.agr1&Wurnl districf'OR Wthiii 500 fees'of a farm Qperatioiz loeated int agicu ural dr'.strict.Aff applications.requiring nit q icultdW datk -.sta0.qent m'usi be referred to the Suffolk'Couhty DeparGnent of Planniar.in accoi~daitce•ivitfi_sections 239= - M.dnd•239_a of't he?lett Afunteipol Lain. 1)Nahie bfApplit �j Andre s ofApplicant:- • _po ' A • _ 7g-5 - /mli-' f l9 - - 3) TaiYie of Land-OWricr(if other than applicant) :_ --- --_ -- - 4)Address of Laud Owner.. 5)Desch '#iori-of 1'ropbsed Project: -'6)'Location of Pmperty(road acid tax mp numbor): -7)Is.tlrep cel witTiiri an i gricu�tiiTal district? o DYes•If yes,Agd ultutal District Number_: - 8)Is th7s 13arcel'anti vely.faim_ edbyes, _ 9) Name and -address rpf idy. ()Wner(s)_of Tared-within-fhe'agricultural :district containing active far - operation(s)ldcated-50n'feet of the boundary of.the proposed•project: (Infoi�ation'.tiia�r b*available through = the Town Asgess'ors•O�de,.Towir Hall IoaatioYi'.(76- -1937).or from-ainy pubilic:cgmputer:at the Town RAI locations by-viewing tiie parcel numbers on the Town of Soutlioia Real Property'-rax System. Name'andAddress ('leaso use biaek side of pvp if iiiore th4n six property owners are.identified.) ne lift ntimbiers riiaj►be obtained,hi advance,when iegfi ted from thb Qffice of the 1'lantiing Boaid at 7G5 1938 or•the Zoning Bbard of'Appeals at 765-1808.------------- :. r _ 8ig4atttre of Applicpt _Date Nott: 1 1.111e local l3o'atd will'solicit coinuienfs from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effed of the pioposed.actioti On their farm operation.Solicitation will be made by supplying a copy of this st;iteinent. 2..*Comri eats returned to.the local board will-be taken into consideratiop as part ofthe overall review of this application. t3.The clerk to the loeal board is resporisible'foc sending copies of the completed Aide' Data Statement to-the properfy owners identified above.lie dist for mailing shall be paid by the applicant at the time the.application is submitted for review.Failure.to pay at such time means the application is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the board. . ' RECEIVED MAY 2 20171-14-09 . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 617.20 0 0( dij Appenx B ^ Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to fiuther verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You•may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information - Name of Action or Project: Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): fl�o d�� ?.y GAG RECEIVED Brief Description of Proposed Action: lleomvf t 5^q�-s � i7� $' �v — MAY 12 2017 M ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Name of Applicant or Sponsor. Telephone: ��� �1I�1/LAS�! E-Mail• Add s: 4 . t gym,-` Cityrno: ou State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule;or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the,intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. x I I 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and.pennit or approval: 3.a.Total acreage of the site ofthe proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? Q _acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban Rural(non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial>6Residential(suburban) Forest . o Agriculture a Aquatic ❑Other(specify): 0 Parkland Pagel of 4 f 1 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b_Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? —, 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: J 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES, b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/prWate water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water. RFrFT\/Fr) 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? M - - 260 NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment': ZONING RnaRDnF nnp_EA S ' X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? 6.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Ddes any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state otkal_agency? __ — b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14 Identify the typical ha itat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline Eworest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional 17 Wetland 17 Urban. ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm waterdischarge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ; a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? O❑YES x b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoffand orat drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑N?,"S Page 2 of 4 i 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result .�Hc�i-1 jL-ndment o NO YES 1 l water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the` „rwi ai five o lcro osed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsorname: Date.• L 2 l� Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of theme questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the conwrVlal'7017 70 9 7 responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" L No,or _Mod'eKtF PEALS small to large _impact _impact may may occur occur 1. Will the pLoposed_action-create.a-material-conflict with-an-adopted-landvse-plmror7zorcitsg --""--— regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? / 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? -� 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available enemy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? f 7. Will the proposed action impact existing. a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. -Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? }f, I Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the-proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significan& The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 thitt was answered'4moderate to large impact may occur",or if there.is a need to explain why a particular element ofthe proposed action may or will not result in a'significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. RECEIVED U4\1 ZONING BOARD OF.APPEALS [o Check this box ifyou have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. e _E3 Checck this box ifyou.have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agenc'y Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible�Qfficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 , RECEIVED «( JUN 12 2017 Board of Zoning Appeals Application ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) I ® L residing at tic. (Print property owner's name) WWWailing A,�tlress)�� fit do hereby authorize to apply for variance(s)on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. • (Owner's Signature) A. (Print Owner's Name) RECEIVED _ JUN 12 2017 ?a(j ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICANTIOWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Sou thold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the hart of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to Mid same. YOUR NAME• 3"tkFwft;1Awwv4 ' �� (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless youlare applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agenttrepresentative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5°l0 of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant,or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of ,207 Signatur f Print Name APPLICANT/OWNER V - TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The piirpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME• ww"- (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your-company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest.`Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If YES,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person ' Describe the relationshipbetween yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)throughD acid/or describe in the space provided.___ The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP RECEIVEfa Submittedthis � day 0 MAY 12 2017 SignatureLI/X� C &�/ Z1I1IIVG BEAR®OFgppEqLS Print Name 1 own of Southold -- LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM (� I A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficiel-a-nd-adwme-e�eets-upen4he-eeastal-area{�iehh inc4ude�outhold-T-owx). — 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places:-online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northforknet),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION - .-- ---- -- -- --- _------- -SAY --- _ SCTM#- - L---�" � �l Z®NIfVG QoARD pF APPFALS The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Q 49 Location of action. Site acreage: ��0, g i Present land use: GS�fJ -•- Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provid (a) Name of applicant- / (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number.Area Code( ) kpl y � g (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be dirtly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 1-1NoIf yes,which state or federal agency-?_ 45CEIVED MAY 2011 -DEVELOPED"COA:ST POLICY ZOINNG BOARD OFAPPEALS - --Policy 1:Foster-a pattern of-development in-the-T-own-of-Southold that-enhances-community-character,--- - preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial"use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. es F] No- F] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pa es 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 11 Yes ❑'No of Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH—Policies Pages 6.through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable = Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section HI—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria F] Yes n No Not Applicable Z5NI - -G BOAR-a-oF a —Attach additional sheets if necessary_ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section M —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes F] No - - Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary e' — Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No of Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable RECEIVED AAA ¶ Q0Y7 gOWI 9O RnARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public accessan=recrea ' , coastal waters, public Iands, and public resources of-the Town ofSouthold. -See LWRPSection.-M—Policies;-Pages 38-through-46forevaluation criter*a. Yes❑ No❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORIONG COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. Se LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Us [:] NoNod Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ��ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect-agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable- RECEIVED - MAY 12 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AL illillillillillllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilliliiiiiilllllllllll11111111llillillillilljllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIIII sports east ItECEIVEt Vim MIIIR to Com. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS iom 122-7 4 to wap 6i 1 444 AW CIO �t RECEIVED rare hwbwwlm 0+►ne.` ow M"w rm+ 7 WWO 101d%4WMKt%t 1t": IM-13Z7,0 w mo ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS i�Et•N'b�l�ii L. f r t w • L ��s..ki, 4 R • m ( 91 ' — 1 N 1 1 a , %3©o A2..`"i l I( sec= a 9 0-13 -. P - d-14114 Cjos,ed Ts.., p1 r epi of is 4e elvv%wj r -f o e-i1u C JC4� dP t}n YETGia(P%- of fVl b SGsip cold V (01f6 4P70� RECEIVED mAY 12 2097 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS t r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PI TY RECORD CARD W f6 v� - f�a-• � q . STREET t �, VILLAGE DIST, SUB. LOT /tufa rn R6aa( 4-A L, e fly FORM,VR 0)ff NER39;-(? �N Q E r+ ACR r�- S W TYPE OF BUILDING A4,-`4 J( U S l l cc /lints*t}i inAE$. SEA. JV2 FARM tat,_ j Cf?MM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Vclue o - w LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS-- - afrQ9 pQ ira/bor - S� P oa- �us a `) tlu 5 c na 1 C-- ` rj J c._6ga al ro 1'f �r - 11�r' r nn i!1vrs ? 'n . r-,. , -- _ •,:� - .....,�. t . 31 -Fv--Marx.�. /.-�3 5 � Lo _ f L m Lo mLo "' FRONTAGE ON WATER f---------RECEIVED r� fi)ilable m Aloodlartd �� FRONTAGE ON ROAD 'WAY2 2017 m -70I1I11G Bp Acadowkmd DEPTHARp p� N �, r 20. �� �o BULKHEAD 'otal 1144A u r a'cr ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC may® r/y Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERKo= P.O.Box 1179 coo Z Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS _ . Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER Telephone(631)765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER ®.� �►a www.southoldtownny.gov FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A Neville DATE: June 14, 2017 RE: Zoning Board of Appeals—7091 Pawlowski, Paul/Sports East Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No.—7091 Pawlowski, Paul/Sports East Application for Special Exception to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also enclosed is Building Department Notice of Disapproval, Applicants project description, ZBA questionnaire,.note to ZBA dated 5/8/17, cover letter from Charles Cuddy, ZBA decision#6976, agricultural data statement, SEAF, transactional disclosure form, LWRP Consistency assessment form, four (4) pictures, copy of ZBA index card, property card, survey,proposed site plan and overall floor plan. * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 06/14/17 Receipt#: 222216 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 7091 $300.00 Total Paid: $300.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#2162 $30000 Pawlowski, Inc Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Pawlowski, Inc P O Box 783 Mattltuck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: LYNDAR Internal ID•7091 ZBA TO TOWN CLERK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE: 6/9/17 ZBA # NAME CHECK# AMOUNT TC PATE, P 7091 Pawlowski, Paul/Sports 2162 $300.00 JUN 1 4 2017 East Southold Town Clerk $300.00 By_lc_ Thank you. r ti AUG 1 T 20111 � Y, 1-20 9 August 8,2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members,Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.C.Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board.:. - I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26,2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use,as applied for by Sports East,is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception'to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to the area around the facility, including where I live.The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Dain Road would be devastating to wildlifeandto the pastoral beauty of the North Fork,and I hope you will not let that happen. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, aao� s� sto �(`d i cc: Supervisor Scott Russell,Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board August 16, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 2017 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 B Y®®�c�C,/ Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation #6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will have negative impacts to the Mattituck Community: 1. Increased traffic and congestion in an already heavy traffic and congestion area of the Main Road. 2. Granting an R80 Zoning exception once again (Laurel Links the previous exception) sets dangerous precedents that future property investors and owners will use to seek future zoning exceptions that negatively impact our communities. I made the purchase of my home on Sigsbee Road 31 years ago in part knowing the 21 acre treed lot, which is directly behind my backyard, was zoned for residences. My home is my retirement asset. If Sports East is granted this exception, 9 tennis courts will be 70 feet from my back property line. There will be a direct line of sight to the planned commercial building and the massive paved parking lot. This will seriously devalue my property so much more than a beautiful new home 70 feet away from my property. For the reasons I stated affecting our community, and sincere consideration of the negative financial impact I will have, I am asking you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval, and not to grant Sports East an exception of the R-80 Zoning District. Please protect the peace, safety, and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development where it does not belong pursuant to current zoning rules. Sincerely, Bruce Carleton cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board rn August 16, 2017 I SUS 17 2017J Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman By. �(),I/ Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals o 53095 Main Road mmm�m® P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman and Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation #6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will have negative impacts to the Mattituck Community: 1. Increased traffic and congestion in an already heavy traffic and congestion area of the Main Road. 2. Granting an R80 Zoning exception once again (Laurel Links the previous exception) sets dangerous precedents that future property investors and owners will use to seek future zoning exceptions that negatively impact our communities. I made the purchase of my home on Sigsbee Road 31 years ago in part knowing the 21 acre treed lot, which is directly behind my backyard, was zoned for residences. My home is my retirement asset. If Sports East is granted this exception, 9 tennis courts will be 70 feet from my back property line. There will be a direct line of sight to the planned commercial building and the massive paved parking lot. This will seriously devalue my property so much more than a beautiful new home 70 feet away from my property. For the reasons I stated affecting our community, and sincere consideration of the negative financial impact I will have, I am asking you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval, and not to grant Sports East an exception of the R-80 Zoning District. Please protect the peace, safety, and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development where it does not belong pursuant to current zoning rules. Sincerely, Bruce Carleton cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board AUG 17 2017 August 14, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board;,- -I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26,2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to the area around the facility,including where I live. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork, and I hope you will not let that happen. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board aJU 4,P ffio -t- August 14, 2017 ;- '7 a i Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected,I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, <T cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board DAugust 14, 2017 AUG 17 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected,I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, ; 11 � s"a• cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board i i I I AUG 17 2011 August 14, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected, I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, �3z� Sr'c�sbee cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board I r� AUG .1 7 zU11 ` August 8, 2017 - Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board:. - I I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspectors April 26,2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East,is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. I object to the Sports Bast project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to the area around the facility, including where I live.The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork,and I hope you will not let that happen. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Siincerely, e- de Jg1r4 #7 u-,ck� rJ ' r r qS_P— cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board f a Ij r Q 7/- o AUG ' 72817 . r� �.Q s av-j c C2� a-m 67 41 goAll �a-l-�-;�UGFI 1.f Y 11952., :7 Richard and Marie Schulken 16 Capel Drive,Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435 Peconic Bay Boulevard,Mattituck,NY 11952 l''J ®01 1 + RECEIVE® August 7,2017 AUG 1 1 2097 Chairperson Leslie Weisman �ONZNG BOARD OF App�gL� Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman: In reference to the Proposed Sports Complex,we ask the Southold Town Board to take into consideration the following: This beautiful woodland was given residential zoning for a reason. There are acres and acres of farmland on the North Fork,but not near as much acreage filled with beautiful foliage. - Comparisons are being made to Laurel Links ... well,that is a residential community,with homes,golf course,club house,etc. The proposed complex does not compare. We walked back into the area after the hearing last week and tried to imagine what it would be like with a building,tennis courts,pools,etc.,and parking area for almost 300 cars. Definitely not a pleasant picture!. People in the Hamptons now want to come to NoFo as we are now known,because of our natural beauty and this property as it currently exists,certainly meets that description! Once a decision is made and the property is destroyed,there is no turning back. If the Sports Complex does not work out, God knows what will be built on the property. We sincerely hope that the Zoning Board will go with their original decision and continue to keep this a Residential Property. We on the North Fork are very fortunate in that those who represent our residents have been key to making our community the beautiful place it is. Realizing that residents strongly want to achieve their goal to develop a Sports Complex,however,we do feel that if this need is important to them,an appropriate property will be found. Thank you again for your efforts on behalf of the Mattituck Residents. We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie d Rich d Schulken CC: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board Ronald A. McGrath RECEivED 1330 Sigsbee Road, AUG 11 2017 Mattituck, NY 11952 i®flIIVG BOARD OFgppEgLS August 8, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman & Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation #6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected, I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic, noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, Ronald A. McGrath 0,1 CHARLES R.CUDDY --To 1 RECEIVE® ATTORNEY AT LAW 445 GRIFFING AVENUE AUG 112017 RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK ZONING BOARD F 79 0 MailingAddress. TEL: 631 P.O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 August 8, 2017 E-mail: charlescuddy@optonline.� Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Sports East Fitness Club-9300 Route 25,Mattituck,NY SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Dear Ms. Weisman: We wish to summarize, as well as emphasize, the statements made on behalf of Sports East at the public hearing. It is our position that Sports East qualifies-'as.a membership club pursuant to the definition in the Southold Town Code. As noted, it refers to sports in the plural and provides examples. Basically, the Sports East Club includes tennis and swimming, two of the sports referenced in the definition, as principal outdoor sports. - It•'fi Rh6r offers a golf practice area. The area devoted to these outdoor sports is more than 160,000 square feet. The indoor area is essentially designed around racquet sports and swimming, but; as with-most modern membership golf clubs, includes accessory-uses. " While it remains our position that a membership club is distinct in that it does not have to be a golf or country club, in providing a model of uses associated with such clubs, the obvious pertinent example is a golf club located in the same zoning-use district and which received special exception approval. There is a marked similarity in the total uses at each site, although the golf club is principally a single use with multiple accessory uses, while the Sports East membership club has principally two sports and similar accessory uses. Nevertheless,-a membership-club is more than a golf club with accessory uses. The definition recognizes that when it includes a hunting club,which is an indoor club for an outdoor sport: Spotts East follows the language of the definition and adheres to the requirements of this Board's determination.of DecembeK 1, 2016. In both letter and spirit it is a membership club. Very truVyoiirs 127 CRP/. c4• ,t4. . _e. P, Charles=R.'Csudd ..1`�_n s'�1� I t .. td . _ .. •. .. a .. .... .. i 'ff ..• v 4 i . 4 f RECEIVE® -70011 AUG 15 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS fLtwyix�° � �e 5 ,� .Yolz� it19, 22 August, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected, I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. I am aware of the pro opinions for this project However there has been no discussion of the fees that will be charged to join the club. Many people have equated this project to Laurel Links however fees for joining this exclusive club are very expensive and out of reach for most residents of Mattituck. I fear that this will not only cause traffic issues,destroy the enviorment but will end up being just as exclusive as Laurel Links Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, Kimmarie Hammond 1530 Sigsbee Rd Mattituck,NY Cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board - RECEIVED AUG 16 2097 x 115 Brookside Dr Portola Valley CA 940NING BOARD of APPEALS August 8, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman & Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation #6976. 1 am writing as one of three owners of a family summer house at 2325 Sigsbee Road, Mattituck; my sisters Amy and Karen live in Massachusetts and California respectively. The house has been, in our family since the 1950s and is our favorite place in the world. Granting an exception to R-80 Zoning is bad for quality of life in Mattituck and for real estate values. As a summer resident of Sigsbee Road, the street which will "be most severely affected, I object to the Sports East project being located in a quiet residential area — where children frequently walk to the beach on their own. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic, noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, P-�— Jeremy Roschelle, Karen Mengden and Amy Roschelle . RECEIVED Ute.`r � V i I'"1 N M .6 �' 2017 k,4 TIT-1 7-u CFI"— 9 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS August 8, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board— - I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected,I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic,noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, 7 cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board a vet 6 we*I..1�-i/A- _ r S�JP�G4 Md� ✓ r i uentes, Kim From: peg toner <pegtoner@msn.com> XT Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 12:20 PM AUG 10 1017 To: Fuentes, Kim Cc: Russell, Scotty Subject: SPORTS EAST APPEAL ®ear Chairperson Weismann 4 Members of the Board, I urge you,Please, uphold the decision NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL of Request of Special, Exception. The property is zoned R80 and should rem ain,as such. Granting a Special Exception will only open the door to similar requests. A facility such as Sports East would have a devastating affect of the quality of life on Sigsbee Road and the surrounding community. It will produce noise from outdoor as well as indoor activities, such as day and night bouncing of basketballs and tennis. Now the talk of outdoor pool... it's a growing monsterldisaster. _m_.._ _ .....--_---------- reason ' .._._. _. 7'h"a pr gper is za a� d R CI qr� r�ec�s�i . tend should'remain ,ai d,�-such. consider the long and short term affect on the vulnerable Peconic Bay and overall environmental impact. consider the increase in traffic to the already congested intersection and Sigsbee Rd. consider the opportunity, especially at night,for trouble in a parking lot that can not be seen from the Main Rd which creates a perfect place to "hang out".P ;Thq,prvperty is zoned R80 for a reason, and should remain as such.; I could list dozens of reasons for objecting to a Special Exception....but the bottom line is the property is ZONED AS RESIDENTIAL and should remain as such. It is absurd of those who Make comparisons with the Laurel Links property. L Links is a 220 acre parcel with private homes, a REAL golf course and an very, very high membership fee. Please jp$yyuphold � pthe decision DO NOT GRANT SPECIAL EXCEPTION. Sincerely, Margaret Toner i and Marie Schulken 16 Capel Drive, Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck,NY 11 95 ��� � D August 7, 2017 AUG 1 Chairperson Leslie Weisman 1P 5 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman: In reference to the Proposed Sports Complex, we ask the Southold Town Board to take into consideration the following: This beautiful woodland was given residential zoning for a reason. There are acres and acres of farmland on the North Fork, but not near as much acreage filled with beautiful foliage. Comparisons are being made to Laurel Links ... well, that is a residential community, with homes, golf course, club house, etc. The proposed complex does not compare. We walked back into the area after the hearing last week and tried to imagine what it would be like with a building, tennis courts, pools, etc., and parking area for almost 300 cars. Definitely not a pleasant picture!. People in the Hamptons now want to come to NoFo as we are now known, because of our natural beauty and this property as it currently exists, certainly meets that description! Once a decision is made and the property is destroyed, there is no turning back. If the Sports Complex does not work out, God knows what will be built on the property. We sincerely hope that the Zoning Board will go with their original decision and continue to keep this a Residential Property. We on the North Fork are very fortunate in that those who represent our residents have been key to making our community the beautiful place it is. Realizing that residents strongly want to achieve their goal to develop a Sports Complex, however, we do feel that if this need is important to them, an appropriate property will be found. Thank you again for your efforts on behalf of the Mattituck Residents. We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie and Richard Schulken CC: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board I do realize that the year round residents look forward to having a sports complex complete with courts and pools, etc. As a parent and grandparent, I can certainly understand that need. November 18, 2016 Regarding the proposed Brightview Assisted Living Facility, we purchased our home in Dix Hills almost 25 years ago lured by the picturesque Dix Hills area highlighted by the privacy and beauty. We previously lived near Cedar Creek Park in Wantagh and chose to move from the area due to a planned sewage treatment plant. Regarding the proposed plan to build a three story 175,000 square foot bldg. with visible roof top mechanical equipment, that will rise 50 feet above Deer Park Avenue, we feel this is definitely not a good idea. In recent years, we have witnessed a major increase in traffic along the proposed building area. Deer Park Avenue at times is referred to as a Raceway. The cars speeding thru the area early morning and late night is a real concern and other times the traffic is horrendous due to the entrances to Long Island Expressway and Northern State Parkway. This is definitely a safety factor for those frequenting a home for the elderly We understand the need for Assisted Living Facilities, however, other facilities in the area are not fully occupied and due to the cost involved, we now comprehend people are opting for home care. It actually makes more sense. We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community. We see much vacant land along other parts of Suffolk County, and find it difficult to believe that this group cannot find a location which would be more remote and definitely safer for both residents and visitors. When we tell people where we live, they never cease to be amazed at the reputation of this beautiful area. Why are we looking to make negative changes!. Marie and Richard Schulken 16 Capel Drive Dix Hills, NY 11746 -7 Is this where Brightview wants"Lo'build this huge facility. We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! to say additional problems will be traffic, noise pollution and congestion. If the facility as proposed does not work out, the property, complete with the proposed building and the destruction of trees in the wooded area will be left abandoned. Is this what we want for our Sigsbee Road community. Additionally, we cannot begin to imagine the interaction from the horses at Highwind Farms. That will be a horror! We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie and Richard Schulken June 16, 2016 Scott Russell Southold Town Supervisor 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Supervisor Russell Our family purchased a second home on Peconic Bay Boulevard in Mattituck almost 25 years ago attracted by the picturesque area highlighted by the Sigsbee Road Beach and the Peconic Bay, as well as the privacy, security and beauty offered by the Hussing Pond Preserve, 21 acre preserve with nature trail, pond, and Osprey nest. These beautiful offerings have become a place where generations of the Sigsbee Road families call their summer home. With the planned facility, this will change. We cannot begin to imagine what the Sigsbee Road residents will experience when we are adjacent to the proposed facility. This facility will definitely end up being home for large gatherings such as tournaments and other special events. The noise level will be excruciating. Many of our members are summer residents and our homes are vacant during the off season. Typically this is not a problem because our year round residents keep watch on the homes of their neighbors. Due to the exposure of a public area, security will definitely be an issue, the preserve property will be trodden and noise will be an absolute horror. When we drive around the North Fork, we see so much vacant land along other parts of the community, and now the former Mattituck Airport property, we find it difficult to believe that this group cannot find a location in a more remote space. Needless to say additional prubf,,ms will be traffic, noise pollution and�Uo-11gestion. If the facility as proposed does not work out, the property, complete with the proposed building and the destruction of trees in the wooded area will be left abandoned. Is this what we want for our Sigsbee Road community. Additionally, we cannot begin to imagine the interaction from the horses at Highwind Farms. That will be a horror! We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie and Richard Schulken 16 Capel Drive, Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck,NY 11952 June 16, 2016 Southold Town Board Members 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Southold Town Board Members Our family purchased a second home on Peconic Bay Boulevard in Mattituck almost 25 years ago attracted by the picturesque area highlighted by the Sigsbee Road Beach and the Peconic Bay, as well as the privacy, security and beauty offered by the Hussing Pond Preserve, 21 acre preserve with nature trail, pond, and Osprey nest. These beautiful offerings have become a place where generations of the Sigsbee Road families call their summer home. With the planned facility, this will change. We cannot begin to imagine what the Sigsbee Road residents will experience when we are adjacent to the proposed facility. This facility will definitely end up being home for large gatherings such as tournaments and other special events. The noise level will be excruciating. Many of our members are summer residents and our homes are vacant during the off season. Typically this is not a problem because our year round residents keep watch on the homes of their neighbors. Due to the exposure of a public area, security will definitely be an issue, the preserve property will be trodden and noise will be an absolute horror. When we drive around the North Fork, we see so much vacant land along other parts of the community, and now the former Mattituck Airport property, we find it difficult to believe that this group cannot find a location in a more remote space. Needless to say additional problems will be traffic, noise pollution and congestion. If the facility as proposed does not work out, the property, complete with the proposed building and the destruction of trees in the wooded area will be left abandoned. Is this what we want for our Sigsbee Road community. Additionally, we cannot begin to imagine the interaction from the horses at Highwind Farms. That will be a horror! We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie and Richard Schulken 16 Capel Drive, Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck,NY 11952 Richard and Marie Schulken 16 Capel Drive Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435 Peconic Bay Boulevard Mattituck,NY 11952 September 30, 2016 Chairperson Leslie Weisman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman: Residents of the Sigsbee Road Community purchased their vacation homes for the reason they were enticed by the Beach and the Bay, as well as the privacy, security and beauty offered by the Husing Pond Preserve, 21 acres with nature trail, pond, and Osprey nest. These beautiful offerings are where generations of Sigsbee Road families call this are their summer home. With the planned facility, this will definitely change. We cannot begin to imagine what the Sigsbee Road residents will experience when we are adjacent to the proposed facility. This facility will definitely end up being home for large gatherings such as tournaments and other special events. The noise level will be excruciating. Many of our members are summer residents and our homes are vacant during the off season. Typically this is not a problem because our year round residents keep watch on the homes of their neighbors. Due to the exposure of a public area, security will definitely be an issue, the preserve property will be trodden and noise will be an absolute horror. Additionally, a major concern will be whether this proposed facility will succeed since it will require a large number of year round residents for membership. When we drive around the North Fork, we see so much vacant land along other parts of the community, and now the former Mattituck Airport property, we find it difficult to believe that this group cannot find a location in a more remote space. Needless to say additional problems will be traffic, noise pollution and congestion. If the facility as proposed does not work out, the property, complete with the proposed building and the destruction of trees in the wooded area will be left abandoned. Is this what we want for our Sigsbee Road community. Additionally, we cannot begin to imagine the interaction from the horses at Highwind Farms. That will be a horror! We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good location for this proposal. If our summer homes are no longer viewed on a picturesque vacation site, they will cease to be of value. Friends of ours feel we are blessed having a home in Mattituck because it is not"The Hamptons". Is this what we are looking to become? Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! Thank You Marie and Richard Schulken Ami Opisso RECEIVE® 1535 Park Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 AUG ®9 7697 amidavey@hotmail.com 917-414-3573 ZONING BOARD Of APPEALS August 4,2017 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 PO Box 1179 l Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1809 RE:SPORTS EAST APPLICATION To the Zoning Board of Appeals: 1 grew up on the North Fork and am year round resident of Mattituck along with my husband and our two daughters who are one and three years old. I am writing to express my support for Sports East in the location that has been proposed. While I understand the issue at hand is whether or not the property is zoned for a private member club and not simply if there's a need for the facility within the community, I urge you to do everything in your power to grant the exemptions needed to make this club happen. The project's benefit to the community—young and old members—is without question, and the ZBA has an obligation to exercise I its powers in order to carry out the overwhelming will of Southold Town residents. I Personally,this club will afford me the opportunity to stay on the North Fork. My husband was born and raised in Bay Shore, Long Island, where his family spent evenings and summers at the Great South Bay YMCA. We have considered moving"up island"to be closer to a facility like this so that our girls have a healthy,safe place to socialize, exercise and play while growing up, and so that my husband does not have to drive 20 minutes to a gym to work out. Sports East will cement our desire to remain on and raise our children on my beloved North Fork. I cannot stress how positive the impact this facility will be on my family's way of life. Please, please do not screw this up for us. Get this right. Regards, 1 Ami Opisso OA ,, 10111 ' ✓�V " Zoning Board of Appeals RECEIVED 54375 Main Road A PO Box 1179 Southold, Southold, IVY 11971 r,A,Rn OF APPEALS To Whom It May Concern, My name is Anne Bialeski,I have lived in Southold town for 55 years,my husband Felix has lived here for 65 years. We raised our three son's here,two of them still reside in Southold Town. Growing up here was and continues to be a blessing,to live in a community where people know each other and are there for each in times of need.We support the desire to keep our community as charming as can be but also realizing that changeneeds to happen.to better the lives of those who live here. The changes that have come haven't all come without some trepidation;farm fields that our families use to grow potatoes and cauliflower are now covered in grapes and people enjoying that fruit turned into wine....some a little too much,some a little too loud but the beauty of the grapevines when the sunrises or sets is just breathtaking,almost as much as seeing that at one of our beautiful beaches! Getting married and raising our children here was never a question for us,we knew this was our home and this is where our family would flourish. Living on the North Fork has many advantages, our proximity to NYC, to Connecticut, to the sound, the bay, the ocean, to physicians,_ hospitals,to wonderful schools,libraries,churches,we have it all except that access to a sports club that would really benefit so many families.When my children were growing up we drove all over the island in the winter to play indoor sports, it was crazy and back then traffic wasn't as much of an issue as it is now. We had always thought how great it would be to have a facility right here in our township that would give us an opportunity to play sports all year long and now these three men come along and want to do just that. At the meeting the other day when-they said it was a gift,I watched the faces of those in the room that are opposed as their jaws dropped and they mouthed to each"a gift?".Well from my perspective, it is a gift because my tax dollars will not go to fund it or run it,so yes it is a gift. Not only will this club benefit the younger generation it will also be a place for swimming for rehabilitation;I fractured two vertebrae last fall and would have benefitted tremendously had I had access to an indoor pool. I"know that people on Sigsbee are concerned about their backyards-but honestly if you look at the property Sports East will be maintaining a pretty wide buffer so that the homeowners probably won't even see the facility. I am always amazed how people approve of something, like affordable housing for example, but maintain that not in my backyard attitude. And about those people that spoke against the facility at the meeting the other day,a quick google search of their names shows that they are not year-round residents of Mattituck so their concerns are not the same as those of us who live here 12 months of the year. The loud woman who spoke about being afraid the building would be abandoned and invite drugs etc.perhaps doesn't know Paul Pawlowski well enough to know that he would never let a project fail.I have known Paul for a very long time,he went to school with my eldest son.I remember when Paul started his own lawn mowing business, he turned that into a success and continues to be successful with all that he does. People should be applauding him and all he wants to do for HIS TOWN instead of ripping him apart as some person just out to make money(don't we all want to make money?) I want you to think about something when you go to render your decision,just about every business that has come to Southold Town in the last 20 years or so has been one that's success is based on alcohol of some kind;vineyards,breweries and restaurants.This business,Sports East,will be a healthy alternative,a place where families can go together without some drunk mess disturbing their fun. It will be a place where our school age children can go to get out from in front of a "screen" and enjoy an exhilarating game of tennis or pickle ball,shoot some golf balls or swim in the pool,fun and healthy all at the same time,maybe having access to something like this will curb the rampant use of drugs and alcohol in our town. If anyone in our town doesn't realize that drugs and alcohol is a problem then they have blinders on. Sports East will be something that will provide a year-round facility to benefit our year-round residents. There are always exceptions to the rules and this exception is one that I think needs to be made. Thank you for your consideration, e Bialeski 4235 Deep Hole Drive RECEIVED PO Box 678 Mattituck,NY 11952 AUG 0 9 2017 �ONINC BOARD OF APPEALS AW 0 0 2017 Dear Zoning Board Members, Thank you for your time during the public hearing, since the hearing was held "open" we wanted to put in writing what Sports East will be used for and the overall use that we are applying for. Sports East will be limited to the following as a private membership club. Sports East is a tennis/racket and golf club with the following amenities for our members, Indoor(82,500 sq.feet of area) 5 Indoor tennis courts with the multi-sport court used for pickle ball and exercise, 2 racket ball courts- This is the main indoor use as it is mainly for racket sports, 1 Indoor pool 1 Indoor field this will be mainly used for exercise and indoor gold practice area The following are also indoor but these are standard amenities when having a private membership club as all clubs have these items, (pro shop, gym, lockers, office, food cafe service area) I want to point out the main indoor use for our members is tennis, golf and the pool, nobody will be buying a membership for just the gym or the indoor field area. Similar to at Laurel links the main uses there are tennis, pool and golf, you can even just buy a tennis membership or a pool membership and never play golf at laurel links When talking about the multi-use court inside and I mentioned basketball and other sports that is not the primary use at the club and not a membership that we will be offering, similar to when laurel links puts up volleyball net or they set up a small scale croquet court for its members from time to time. Outdoor(160,000 sq.foot of area) 9 Outdoor tennis courts 1 golf practice area and exercise trail 1 outdoor pool I want to point out that the outdoor areas will be used for 8-9 months out of the year and double the indoor use in terms of square footage, The outdoor sports are our primary use and what a person will have access to when buying a membership at Sports East. 01 When buying a membership at Sports East the membership will be for golf, tennis and the pool only, Similar to Laurel Links were the membership is for golf, tennis and the pool. At the public hearing you wanted us to look into seeing is there are any golf clubs and or membership clubs that received a special exception with accessory uses. I understand why this was asked but at the same time I am not sure why as Laurel Links which received a special exception has the same amenities that we are offering such as pool, gym and tennis courts. So while most private clubs are for golf that doesn't mean that the code was designed for only golf clubs and a special exception can only be given to them. I don't believe anyone has ever put forth the private membership club that we are offering within Southold Town however the need for a special exception on R 80 land has be given to other clubs within Southold Town and when it comes to zoning that is the most important precedent set. They are a private club and received a special exception and we are proposing a private membership club and asking for the same special exception while offering the same exact sports and amentias a member could use. So when you ask us to find another club with accessory uses I think what matter most is that yes other clubs have received a special exception on R 80 property as that's what is permitted by code. My main point is that we are proposing a private membership club on R80 property similar to Laurel links and the North Fork Country Club. This is the reason and the need for the special exception. Other clubs within our town that I know if that are on R- 80 and R-40 that are private are the Rotary Clubs, Legion Halls, Yacht Clubs, Gun Club, Pequash beach Club, Maratooka Beach Club, North Fork Country Club, Laurel Links, Cedars Golf Club. I bring this up because the precedent is there for similar uses on residential zoned properties. Some of the clubs I mentioned have wither and indoor and outdoor use or just an indoor use. Some of these clubs were in place before defined codes however if we talk about today and the codes as they stand today the "special exception" allows you as a board to approve Sports East as proposed. Attached is the updated site plan showing the outdoor pool we feel this outdoor pool will truly make the members have the ability to use the club in the summer months as the indoor courts and pools will not be used as much during those months. We are asking for a private membership club as the applicant I really do not know what more we can do to prove that it will be, we will be charging annual dues,the sports we will be played both indoor and outdoor and the greater usesage will be mainly outdoors. Reading the code, we feel this works well with the code and compares to other clubs that were approved Again Thank you for your time and please let us know if you have any questions Regards Paul Pawlowski --- ------------- E�Ton "41 CURB TRANSITIO T, 3 (SEE DETAILS) noc Ict sE�rjQN,,­- -'V,' BL,�_, 407 2 c 4r% PROPOSED _E�ll PA. o;I 2LCI- _01 2 F =T 011 _CK ILOCI, I -I- _Cc�' -CCK R TT SEC"' 3 IT J�3 EpI rf I r� PE�-tD C., °U1v' TIERE 'co FR "C- q _tm 111c D &A� o s—cl RIJD�-�U E,r HANDICAP RAMP pcl-- ­T PROPOSED r33 28' 25 97"E 'TYPE YPE �RO HANDICAP ` 1652 84' RAMP 7 BEGIN ONE 'TYPE ll PROPOSED , AY"SIGN 'STOP'SIGN ONE 805 70 P.— 11124 0' .RIGHT[c] RIGHT TURN OUTDOOR INGROUND RI-I 3 ONLY'SIGN R6-8 POOL 13 V PROPOSE611­'��l C _1 .. r iH*IIl!.I_i 'DO NOT ENTER' 9 SEE SANITARY PLAN 18 2 19 wr/cci _4�-_ I 224 FOR SYSTEM LAY) 2145' A R® (STRUCTURES NOT 8 2017 SHOWN FOR CLARITY) "DO NOT -02 0' log OT ENTER' PROPOSED 'RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN 71 !7) PRO DEPT11AVIHALT Fe R3-5R 5oo— H M M ,, -TYPE I- lo) 26 PROPOSED BUILDING N40 31' 34 06"E —346 A— (FIN FLR EL 27 DO-) 59 600 96' IN &STOP BAR -D �"'Op PROPOSED .• PROPOSED BIKE 111\, \; Rt-t P Rd' I _—_ _ - - — ___ h c vAmt��­q Z150' PROPOSED FULL "ST HOLE DEPTH ASPHALT THOLE (SEE DETAILS) --- --------- EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED RAMP PROPOSED 21 2 ------ HANDICAP TYPE I &4* 159 7- l* EX UTILITY POLE f 133 TO REMAIN • c ---- -------- -A -- --- -- ------- - ------- - ------- - ----------- ------------------- ---------------------- -------------- --- --- - RD --------- ----- Prxr . . . . . . . C HANDIPAP oSE —C 'ER I Ec S7�,`Lc ------------------------------- PRO HANDICAP RAMP 2' _y CURB TRAN ON 'TYPE ClAcps, (S L S) 'B� N33 2 ED PROPOSED EE D 8' 25 94"W 148719' SITE PLAN SCALE 1"=60' NOTE, LEGEND Fxl FOR MO E INFORMATION ABOUT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT DETAILS ALONG NYS ROUTE 25 SEE DRAWING C5 PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) PROPOSED CRUSHED BLUESTONE PAVEMENT c PROPOSED 20' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE (BETWEEN ROAD& MULTI-USE FIELD) PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED 10' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE :IKIL,, .U�Rllll"Il (AROUND TENNIS COURTS) _;IT, NG REQUIRED 1 STALL PER 300 SF GFA 300 SF-172 STALLS PROPOSED PLAYGROUND TURF(BURKE OR APPV'D EQUAL) PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT SAW CUT 5 STALLS PER COURT 5 X 10-50 STALLS z JuLTI-USE FIELD I STALL PER 2 PLAYERS EM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED MULCH TOTAL.REQUIRED 233 SrALLS PROPOSED CROSSWALK HANDICAP STALLS REQUIRED 7 STALLS PROPOSED SYNTHETIC FIELD TURF STALLSAP PROVIDED _+3 PROPOSED HANDICAP PARKING 232 _ PROPOSED ACRYLIC COATED PAVEMENT TOTAL STALLS 240 yl I PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE z PROPOSED 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8/7/17 MF ADDED OUTDOOR POOL CFD PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED CONC APRON SITE DATA TABLE 6/29/15 LCR AS PER COMMENTS FROM NYSDOT DATED 4/28/16 CFD/RGD 1 I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NUMBER(S) loop-122-07-09 3/9/16 LMY 24' WIDE WEST ENTRY/EXIT DRIVE & SIGNS CFD 2 PROPOSED TOPSOIL& SEED PROPOSED LIGHT POLE 2 ZONING CLASS R-e0(RESIDENCE) DESCRIPTION APPROV BY 3 AREA OF SUE 2082 ACRES(906,919 20 SF) REVISIONS PROPOSED TREE LIMIT PROPOSED PARKING STALL COUNT 4 INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY RECREATION ❑ 6 DATUM USC &GS OR TOB U S C &G S/MAD83(HORIZONTAL)&NAVD88(VERTICAL) 9300 ROUTE 25, LAUREL N.Y. 11948 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB 7 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SEE TEST HOLE ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SUFFOLK COUNTY ZONING COMPLIANCE TABLE ( R-80 RESIDENTIAL ) z ALLOWED(REQUIRED) PROVIDED 11, SPORTS EAST RECREATION CLUB MINIMUM LOT SIZE 80 DOD SF 906.919 20 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 175 FT 577 68 FT _MAXIMUM BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 20% (181,39342 SO 91R 82500 SF) PROPOSED SITE PLAN MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA(F�R) N/A 82.500 SF LANDSCAPED AREA N/A 639.(57 005 SO MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES N/A 21 407.(194.000 SO L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK 60 556-11, MINIMUM DE -D: 213_3* CONSULTING E.—Et. AN WM OONT�M,BRWKNA M,NEW MRK 11)19 MINIMUM REAR YARD 75' 418'-1I' Dg-d By AS NOTED Sh.t N . IMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35 1 35'Fr(3R—FT R-17 NT) D—n By MF tet. FEBRUARY 2016 C4 Approved By RGD F1,11 No 16029 000 e AUG 0 8 2o17D Dear Zoning Board Members, BY.__ L -1L_a_ Thank you for your time during the public hearing, since the hearing was held "open" we wanted to put in writing what Sports East will be used for and the overall use that we are applying for. Sports East will be limited to the following as a private membership club. Sports East is a tennis/racket and golf club with the following amenities for our members, Indoor(82,500 sq.feet of area) 5 Indoor tennis courts with the multi-sport court used for pickle ball and exercise, 2 racket ball courts- This is the main indoor use as it is mainly for racket sports, 1 Indoor pool 1 Indoor field this will be mainly used for exercise and indoor gold practice area The following are also indoor but these are standard amenities when having a private membership club as all clubs have these items, (pro shop, gym, lockers, office, food cafe service area) I want to point out the main indoor use for our members is tennis, golf and the pool, nobody will be buying a membership for just the gym or the indoor field area. Similar to at Laurel links the main uses there are tennis, pool and golf, you can even just buy a tennis membership or a pool membership and never play golf at laurel links When talking about the multi-use court inside and I mentioned basketball and other sports that is not the primary use at the club and not a membership that we will be offering, similar to when laurel links puts up volleyball net or they set up a small scale croquet court for its members from time to time. Outdoor(160,000 sq.foot of area) 9 Outdoor tennis courts 1 golf practice area and exercise trail 1 outdoor pool I want to point out that the outdoor areas will be used for 8-9 months out of the year and double the indoor use in terms of square footage, The outdoor sports are our primary use and what a person will have access to when buying a membership at Sports East. When buying a membership at Sports East the membership will be for golf, tennis and the pool only, Similar to Laurel Links were the membership is for golf, tennis and the pool. At the public hearing you wanted us to look into seeing is there are any golf clubs and or membership clubs that received a special exception with accessory uses. I understand why this was asked but at the same time I am not sure why as Laurel Links which received a special exception has the same amenities that we are,offering such as pool, gym and tennis courts. So while most private clubs are for golf that doesn't mean that the code was designed for only golf clubs and a special exception can only be given to them. I don't believe anyone has ever put forth the private membership club that we are offering within Southold Town however the need for a special exception on R 80 land has be given to other clubs within Southold Town and when it comes to zoning that is the most important precedent set. They are a private club and received a special exception and we are proposing a private membership club and asking for the same special exception while offering the same exact sports and amentias a member could use. So when you ask us to find another club with accessory uses I think what matter most is that yes other clubs have received a special exception on R 80 property as that's what is permitted by code. My main point is that we are proposing a private membership club on R80 property similar to Laurel links and the North Fork Country Club. This is the reason and the need for the special exception. Other clubs within our town that I know if that are on R-80 and R-40 that are private are the Rotary Clubs, Legion Halls, Yacht Clubs, Gun Club, Pequash beach Club, Maratooka Beach Club, North Fork Country Club, Laurel Links, Cedars-Golf Club. I bring this up because the precedent is there for similar uses on residential zoned properties. Some of the clubs I mentioned have wither and indoor and outdoor use or just an indoor use. Some of these clubs were in place before defined codes,however if we talk about today and the codes as they stand today the "special exception" allows you as a board to approve Sports East as proposed. Attached is the updated site plan showing the outdoor pool we feel this outdoor pool will truly make the members have the ability to use the club in the summer months as the indoor courts and pools will not be used as much during those months. We are asking for a private membership club as the applicant I really do not know what more we can do to prove that it will be, we will be charging annual dues, the sports we will be played both indoor and outdoor and the greater usesage will be mainly outdoors. Reading the code, we feel this works well with the code and compares to other clubs that were approved Again Thank you for your time and please let us know if you have any questions Regards Paul Pawlowski -7- --------------------- - (SEE DETAILS) 4j PROPOSED CURB TRANSITION r B _DTELTIc,I BLOC, LOT E,,Tl" I FLCC� I _07 6 2 1 &1,, 10, 4 ,-Er sz.-Te'l 1, su e C,­T` LO SL _1" V. PLOCI, I L37 Ep E06NER R--ME cl ZA 7EPUTED I-,IEC Cll'�l FEL I�tlo I c 11 1 RE-IF,CV,Z� PIIJTEU , TZF, �­Ep RE" D, V71-, BE lu7D 0 F _L S '1100 "NER Q, !aEETH E,6 'I, 'F HIIE, PI-PED,SIDIP BE IGIRET 0� A�y�E­, �A IIILE JI '02 el 'E� tlEf? PROPOSED N, ,..!CAP RAMP ARC,.R__ P I HL� RC�-E TYPE IqBl PROPOSED ,',g �L­_-2 S33 28' 25 97 L_;�­ .0- HANDICAP r, N r �Ec`GI ' 165284'ONE RAM WAY'SIG "STOP'SIGN ,TYPE V PROPOSED mcgRyR, FCI' PROPOSED Rfl .1 S' 70 0 1R.-E. 1. 'RIGHT NPN OUTDOOR INGROUND R114 0' ONLY*SIGN RB-6 POOL G AU .0 2017 PROFC);E"'I' RI-I 703 13 V I RMIle I-ff- SEE FOR SYSTEM SANITARY PLAN 21 5. Is Y R LAY0 T -Ei* (SrRUCrUR NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) B . PROPOSED R .Do NOT ENTER" PROPOSED 'RIGHT TURN ONLY'SIGN E:1 0 2C 0 PROPOSED FULL DEPR5_' HASP ILS u5� 2V . (SEE D 11 R3-5R R, 'YP)F I 1500 PROPOSED OSED HANDICAP PE'tt ' 60' P4 T- CI N40 3 V 3406"E 412.JI! 44 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 -3359' 3x64' PROPOSED R4v —VR4' I I - - - (FIN. FUR EL 27 00') BC 60 -STOP-SIGN &STOP BAR PRqJfUhhU dlKt 4 4189 1-0 0. ILA ?150 PROPOSED FULL 'Y� 1 DEPTH ASPHALT R30' -Tcr IEST HOLE 13 (SEE DETAILS) 30' EXISTING SIGN v TO BE REMOVED PROPOSE 21 i2' P HAN ICA RAMP • ---------- 'TYPE I &4' ------------ IL 15!!7 14 EX unuTY POLE 'Bi W TO REMAIN 7f7 ------- -- -- --- --- ---- ------- ---- ---------- --- - -------- ------------------ -------------- - ----- ----------- --- ------------ --y -y-y-,_rl� __ -------- ----------------- _71, --Y PRO OS Y HANDICAP P -L L ED _;7 PROPOSED L-1 ------ --- _yOvp`P-, ,,_(-(' PRO SED HANDICAP RAMP A tj 'TYPE 10B CURB ON N33 LCT I (S TRAM 28' 25 94"Wf EE D 1487 19' SITE PLAN SCALE 1"=60 NOTE LEGEND: w10 FOR MORE INRMAON ABOUT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT DETAILS ALONGFONYSTIROUTE 25,SEE DRAWING C5 PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) CL PROPOSED CRUSHED BLUESTONE PAVEMENT PROPOSED 20' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE (BETWEEN ROAD & MULTI-USE FIELD) PdpKING REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED 10' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE T (AROUND TENNIS COURTS) ON-SITE PARKING REQUIRED 5 4lTj�8_LSFPER 0030S0F�F GFA Li 51-484 STALLS I PROPOSED PLAYGROUND TURF(BURKE OR APPV'D EQUAL) PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT SAW CUT 5XJSTAULS�.PER COURT 5 0 50 STAT S MULTI-USE FIELD 1 STALL PER 2 PLAYERS PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 72 PLAYERS= 11 MALLS PROPOSED MULCH TOTAL STALL S REQUIRED 233 STALLS PROPOSED SYNTHETIC FIELD TURF PROPOSED CROSSWALK HANDICAP STALLS REQUIRED 7 STALLS WOE. 112 PROPOSED HANDICAP PARKING ea.D, -La PROPOSED ACRYLIC COATED PAVEMENT ,T41 240 PROPOSED 5'WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK M. PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 8/7/17 MF ADDED OUTDOOR POOL CFD < PROPOSED CONC APRON PROPOSED SIGN SITE DATA TABLE 6/2 PER COMMENTS FROM NYSOOT DATED 4/28/16 CFD/RGD I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NUMBER(S) 1000-122-07-09 3/9/16 A 24 WIDE WEST ENTRY/EXIT DRIVE & SIGNS CFD PROPOSED LIGHT POLE 2 ZONING CLASS R-80(RESIDENCE) DATE DESCRIPTION APPROV BY 2 PROPOSED TOPSOIL & SEED 3 AREA OF SITE 2082 ACRES(906.919 20 SF) 1 7 PROPOSED TREE UNIT PROPOSED PARKING STALL COUNT 4 INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY RECREATION REVISIONS 6 DATUM USC &GS OR TOR USC &GS/NAD83(HORIZONTAL)&NAVIDE18(VERTICAL) 9300 ROUTE 25, LAUREL N.Y. 11948 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB 7 DEPTHTOGROUNDWATER SEE TEST HOLE ON EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SUFFOLK COUNTY ZONING COMPLIANCE TABLE ( R-80 RESIDENTIAL ) ALLOWED(REQUIRED) PROVIDED 80 ODO SF 906.919 20$F SPORTS EAST RECREATION CLUB MINIMUM LOT SIZE 7 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 175 FT 57768 FT MAXIMUM BUILDING LOT COVERAGE Ill 181,393 42 SO 91%(82PROPOSED SITE PLAN MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA(FAR) 8 0 S.500 SIF N/A 2.50 F LANDSCAPED AREA NLA 637(57 005 SF) MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES NA 21 407(194.000 SF) MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK 60 556-11, L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONS�LTING ENGINEERS 4p—=_i0..u...m.-Irm."m MINIMUM SIDE YARD 1 20. 213-3- MINIMUM REAR YARD Designed By MF/CFD s..i. AS NOTED Sheet Na MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 1 35 35'_Fr(38-40'T RIDGE HT) C D­n By MF Da. FEBRUARYY 2016 4 App-ed By RIGID ne No 16029 000 �V. I 4-D . Fuentes, Kin From: Leslie Weisman Forward Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 7:05 PM _ To: Fuentes, KimXemz ' Cc: Duffy, Bill AY&F4 201 i? Subject: Fwd: Mattituck sports facility letter-8-2017 Attachments: Mattituck sports facility letter-9-2016.docx + � `705� Kim, Not sure why this woman sent this letter directly to me but since the hearing is still open Please add it to our file and forward it to the other board members Thanks Leslie Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: Resent-From: <lesliewgtown.southold.ny.us> From: Lynn Cali-Cianci <lciancigytivision.com> Date: August 3, 2017 at 9:40:09 AM EDT To: "lesliew o town.southold.ny.us" <lesliew o,town.southold.ny.us> Cc: "lsciancigyahoo.com" <lsciancigyahoo.com> Subject: Mattituck sports facility letter-8-2017 Please present this letter to the Town Board at todays Town Board Meeting 8-3-2017 @ 1:00pm' Thank you To:The Town of Southold As a resident of Mattituck we have many concerns regarding the proposed Mattituck sports facility. For one Mr. Pawlowski, is taking away our untouched land and wasting resources. He said it himself that we already have the Capitol One Bank building that is vacant and directly across the street from his proposed site-so why not use this vacant facility that already has access to Main Rd and would have the least amount of construction impact on our local environment. Has there been given any consideration to the impact on traffic it will have if the Capital One building has full tenant occupancy, the proposed sports facility has full membership and outside rental occupancy, the current residential/business and tourist traffic. Is the Town of Southold requesting traffic impact studies that include these issues and possibilities from Mr. Pawlowski? The new revised plan that Mr. Pawlowski is proposing with increased use of the outdoor space is not answering any of the issues that have already been brought forward and have denied his plan . In fact the increase in outdoor usage of the facility will only increase the noise level and traffic issues associated with this type of complex. Local residents do not want to be listening to the noise generated from all these proposed outdoor activities from 7:00am to 10:00pm. This is a residential beach community and the Town of Southold should help the residients of Mattituck to keep it this way. What is the guarantee that this spaced will not be used for outside venues at a revenue generator for Mr. Pawloski. He has also said that the membership would be affordable-well that is a very relative term by Mr Pawlowski. What may be affordable to him may be out of reach for many of the local year round residents. What is holding him back from making this info public-the approx cost of the memberships should be given with the full proposal. Why is the town of Southold not protecting their residents and finding out the membership costs? We the residents of the Town of Southold would like to know the proposed membership fees-then we will see how many local residents are in favor of these plans. Is there also a guarantee from Mr. Pawlowski that the use of the facility is limited to members only and' that outside venues cannot rent, lease or be given any use of these facility's. More importantly why did the only member representing the town of Southold not vote in the most planning commission vote and all those that did vote are not even part of the town of Southold -whose town is this anyways? Maybe a sports facility should be built in the residential areas of East Hampton and Southampton? Better yet how about this facility is built in Mr. Pawlowski's backyard with an 80ft tree buffer for privacy. What are the plans to buffer the noise from a soccer field that could conceivably have a crowd of 100+ people, cheering and playing,from 5:30 am to 11:000pm on any given day or night of the week or weekend ? Has the issue of noise pollution been addressed? Is anyone listening out there or is it too loud already that you cannot hear us. This is a beautiful residential community,why is the Town of Southold allowing a developer to ruin it. What happened to the Peconic Land Trust Foundation? Why did we pay into this fund if they are not available to support the community when we need them? If this project is approved we are allowing Mr. Pawlowski to make Mattituck a commercial community that will be the host to large sporting events year-round and a large commercial building that will resemble that of an industrial park warehouse. If the Town of Southold is doing this for the increase in tax revenue than maybe they should look at other alternatives. For example—trim the fat in local government, increase waste disposal fees for non- residents, increase summer recreational fees for non-residents, etc... We the residents of Town of Southold need the local government to have our backs and protect us from industrial invasions like this. Thank you for your time, Lynn Cianci Sal Cianci 2 J �Oct As a resident of Mattituck I have many concerns regarding the proposed Mattituck sports facility. For one Mr. Pawlowski, is taking away our untouched land and wasting resources. He said it himself that we already have the Capitol one bank building that is vacant and directly across the street from his proposed site-so why not use this vacant facility that already has access to Main Rd and would have the least amount of construction impact on our local environment. Has there been given any consideration to the impact on traffic it will have if the Capital One building has full tenant occupancy, the proposed sports facility has full membership and outside rental occupancy,the current residential/business and tourist traffic. Is the Town of Southold requesting traffic impact studies that include these issues and possibilities from Mr. Pawlowski? The new revised plan that Mr. Pawlowski is proposing with increased use of the outdoor space is not answering any of the issues that have already been brought forward and have denied his plan . In fact the increase in outdoor usage of the facility will only increase the noise level and traffic issues associated with this type of complex. Local residents do not want to be listening to the noise generated from all these proposed outdoor activities from 7:OOam to 10:OOpm. This is a residential beach community and the Town of Southold should help the residients of Mattituck to keep it this way. What is the guarantee that this spaced will not be used for outside venues at a revenue generator for Mr. Pawloski. He has also said that the membership would be affordable-well that is a very relative term by Mr Pawlowski. What may be affordable to him may be out of reach for many of the local year round residents. What is holding him back from making this info public-the approx cost of the memberships should be given with the full proposal. Why is the town of Southold not protecting their residents and finding out the membership costs? We the residents of the Town of Southold would like to know the proposed membership fees-then we will see how many local residents are in favor of these plans. Is there also a guarantee from Mr. Pawlowski that the use of the facility is limited to members only and that outside venues cannot rent, lease or be given any use of these facility's. More importantly why did the only member representing the town of Southold not vote in the most planning commission vote and all those that did vote are not even part of the town of Southold -whose town is this anyways? Maybe a sports facility should be built in the residential areas of East Hampton and Southampton? Better yet how about this facility is built in Mr. Pawlowski's backyard with an 80ft tree buffer for privacy. What are the plans to buffer the noise from a soccer field that could conceivably have a crowd of 100+ people, cheering and playing from 5:30 am to 11:OOOpm on any given day or night of the week or weekend ? Has the issue of noise pollution been addressed? Is anyone listening out there or is it too loud already that you cannot hear us. This is a beautiful residential community, why is the Town of Southold allowing a developer to ruin it. What happened to the Peconic Land Trust Foundation? Why did we pay into this fund if they are not available to support the community when we need them? If this project is approved we are allowing Mr. Pawlowski to make Mattituck a commercial community that will be the host to large sporting events year-round and a large commercial building that will resemble that of an industrial park warehouse. If the Town of Southold is doing this for the increase in tax revenue than maybe they should look at other alternatives. For example—trim the fat in local government, increase waste disposal fees for non- residents, increase summer recreational fees for non-residents, etc... We the residents of Town of Southold need the local government to have our backs and protect us from industrial invasions like this. r ,�flat Thank you for your time, Lynn Cianci Sal Cianci Am 2 J4 W�'P I continue to watch Mr. Pawloski defend his persistent an` pursuit of this project with a sense of dread. Year after year, .meeting after meeting, the ZBA asks him to reformulate his grand plan for what is essentially the transformation of a residential lot into a commercial business venture. And yet with every meeting I wonder at what point his purchase will be rewarded. Why should it be rewarded? His plan does not include a library, school, hospital, or any of the other neighborhood essentials that benefit a community. Nor does it meet the primary attributes of R-80 zoning. This is a want, desired by only those who would choose to use it. And the primary beneficiaries would be the developers. Make no mistake about that. Nevertheless, this is not a merit based argument. If it were, we would be here all day listening to those who would like to swim and play tennis in a convenient location. But knowing he never intended to build the 8-10 houses that would be in keeping with not only the zoning but with what that lot could bear in terms of traffic, congestion, pollution, water capacity, ecology, etc, seems exploitive and should not be rewarded. Anyone traveling that road can see that it has been degraded to such an extent that any further development beyond the 8-10 residential houses that it is zoned for would be bordering on reckless and ultimately regrettable. But lie couches this pursuit in the agreed upon terms that meet the definitions that will allow him to proceed with this manipulation such as special exception, variance, membership club, or whatever terms he needs to advance it. will he succeed? Each year many residents voice their approval for this project but their acquiescence, and yours will come at a cost in the future. The future will demand that the North Fork preserve the little that is left of it and the only question then will be "what is left?" and then of course, the next question sadly will be "why is so little left?" That answer will lay in past decisions and in the decisions made today and in the coming years. It will be because of projects like this that took advantage with zoning manipulations because the Boards did not ask enough of developers and allowed them to dictate what the parameters were, instead of simply saying: The answer is NO, the zoning does not allow for that. If this Board allows this square peg to fit into the round hole, others will simply ask the salve of you, or other boards for their projects. This is the problem and frankly the danger. He is comparing his project to the most recent R-80 zoning that has already been granted; Laurel Links. It's a domino effect for developers. They've been given a special exception, so he should be granted one as well. The precedent has been set so you should be expected to continue it. This is the logic other developers will use if.Mr. Palowski is granted his special exception. This will be the North Fork's down fall if we allow this domino effect to continue, no matter how desirable the project. But again, this is not a merit based argument. Mr. Pawloski is a developer, of all people, he should be able to find a commercial vehicle to adapt in a different location with acceptable zoning. This Sports Club may be a bellwether, and in that purview I ask you to ask your future selves if you could have demanded more of this developer, or in this case, less, much, much less. Your decision will be a statement to developers that they should not purchase residential acreage with the express goal of commercialization through special exceptions, because this is what we will be greeted with. oat But for the Land Trust preservation, the green lots that lay before you are vulnerable to extreme exploitation, as we are seeing here. Mr. Pawlowski has extolled his status as a North Fork native, and it is a virtue. So at this point I ant beseeching him to redefine his definition of"value" when applied to a 20 acre treed lot on the Main Rd., not as a developer, but as a resident. His definition of the term "value" needs a new and profound understanding beyond business, and beyond what this business would bring to the community. Nothing we have here already, or could ever build here, is of more value than our pastoral beauty, once it is devalued and gone, there is no getting it back. Even allowing for some years success as a sports "club", he needs the pragmatism to understand that small businesses become bygone. Are we to deconstruct the building brick by brick in an effort to replace the acreage that has been disrupted? If he does not have the altruism to act on the wisdom that should come with protectionism, then I continue to implore the Board to act on his behalf. The goal should be to raise the bar for all developers so the Board, and all future Boards are not manipulated for profit's sake, or for the short term values of developer's transient projects that in the scheme of things brings no inherent long term value to the beauty or the landscape of this area. So what are we to ask of Mr. Pawloski's plans now? He is perpetually trying to adapt his plan to what you are asking of hien. But are you asking enough of him? As the citizens that will be the most affected by this project, (and trust me, neighboring 9 outdoor tennis courts thwacking day and evening is beyond frightening,) we insist that you rightfully ask developers to stay true to the zoning they've acquired. Or that they employ adaptive reuse with imaginative planning and design with what has already been erected. We are not looking 20 years down the line, we are asking for a long term view of the Fork and its enduring beauty. It has not escaped me, nor should it be lost on this Board that Mr. Pawloski has recently purchased the building across the street from this lot. It is a commercial building. Who knows what it could be in another life if some planning and design went into it. It seems it could function as a gym without having to contort itself so drastically as to have mainly outdoor sports functions. Nevertheless, if our working Boards won't define the parameters for developers now, we will have determined our future landscape and it is not hard to imagine: it already lays 20 miles east of us, in Riverhead. Thank you. Joy Ellinghaus 77 -T AUG o 2017 a dw, Cievvi,tea e AKsNo niiw *ip oliom X Jemr -Nwrk�� 1-71'-9)5X2 August, 2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Members, Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0959 Re: Sports East Appeal Dear Chairperson Weisman&Members of the Board: I am writing to ask you to uphold the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for by Sports East, is not a permitted use in the R- 80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code interpretation#6976. Granting the applicant an exception to the R-80 Zoning will cause a serious deterioration of the quality of life in Mattituck. As a resident of Sigsbee Road,the street which will be most severely affected, I object to the Sports East project being located in a residential area. The proposed facility will bring increased traffic, noise pollution and congestion to our block in particular and the area in general. The loss of a 21 acre treed lot on the Main Road would be devastating to wildlife and to the pastoral beauty of the North Fork. Please protect the peace, safety and beauty of our town by keeping commercial development out of a place where it clearly does not belong. Sincerely, Cc: Supervisor Scott Russell, Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board r) SECTION 280-4 of the Town Code provides the following definitions: "Club,Membership or Country or Golf-an entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf, tennis, swimming, fishing,hunting or similar activities, but not including any form of aviation, outdoor trap, skeet or target shooting or motorboat racing. ! r v . 1017 3 x AUG 0 D -� oe BY--------------- Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman e AUG,, D Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ll 2011 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 BY:__m_®7i2Lo__ Southold, N.Y. 11971-0959 Dear Chairperson Weisman: I previously wrote to you last June and again in October to oppose the granting of the variance to Sports East for the facility on Main Road just west of Sigsbee Road. Once again, I demand that the Zoning Board of Appeals must find that the facility is not entitled to a special exception as an annual membership club and is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code Interpretation#6976. 1 am a full time resident of Mattituck and a homeowner on Sigsbee Road since 1986. 1 love my home, the area and work incredibly hard investing in the single most valuable asset I own. The value of my home will be most severely affected by the proposed use. Many of my neighbors are year round homeowners and residents of Mattituck. Not a single person with whom I have spoken is in favor of this project. The proposed facility would have devastating impact on both the nature and the safety of Sigsbee Road. It's too big, it has too much parking and it will offer too many amenities for it to be truly an"annual membership club," despite the claims of the developer. Instead, it will be, at best, the location for public events such as tournaments, and at worst, an abandoned eyesore, since the population of the area cannot reasonably be expected to support a"membership club"of this size. Even if the area needs a facility such as this(which I do not think it does, but that is another issue), THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT LOCATION FOR IT. A residential area is the wrong place for a facility like this, and the Zoning Board's duty in this instance is to deny a special exception because the residents of the area oppose it. My opposition to the facility rests on the negative affect on my property value with outdoor tennis courts, parking lot and lighting only 70 feet from my home. In addition I am oppose the increase in traffic, noise pollution and congestion it will bring to our quiet residential community. What will be even more devastating will be the inevitable failure of the project. The facility as proposed would need a large number of consistently paid up members in order to turn a profit, and for a summer community, that is a very tall order. Should the business fail,we will be left with a huge empty building and land cleared of trees and animals. Directly across the street from this property we already have a 20,000 square foot office complex and a parking lot that has been vacant for years. This 21 acre parcel in question will go from being a beautiful part of our town to an ugly eyesore and possible trouble spot from which no one will, least of all the town, will benefit. I demand that the Zoning Board do its duty and find that this facility cannot realistically be a true membership club, in which case the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East for a variance must therefore be denied. Very trul yours Debra Timpone cc: Supervisor Scott Russell Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board LaU-14WA. MU1W JUL 3 1 101 Attorney at Law 7 1220& 1295 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 118-18 Union Turnpike,Apt. 12E,Kew Gardens,NY 11415 r "rZ (516) 503-5344 July 27,2017 Chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Dear Chairperson Weisman: I previously wrote to you last June and again in October to oppose the granting of the variance to Sports East for the facility on Main Road just west of Sigsbee Road. Once again,I demand that the Zoning Board of Appeals must find that the facility is not entitled to a special exception as an annual membership club and is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code Interpretation#6976 I have been a summer resident of Mattituck since 1984, and am the owner of two (2) homes on Sigsbee Road. I am also the President of the Sigsbee Road Civic Association, representing 70 homes on the street which will be most severely affected by the proposed use. Many of these homeowners are year round residents of Mattituck. Not a single person with whom I have spoken is in favor of this project. The proposed facility would have devastating impact on both the nature and the safety of Sigsbee Road. It's too big,it has too much parking and it will offer too many amenities for it to be truly an"annual membership club,"despite the claims of the developer. Instead, it will be, at best,the location for public events such as tournaments,and at worst,an abandoned eyesore, since the population of the area cannot reasonably be expected to support a"membership club" of this size. Even if the area needs a facility such as this(which I do not think it does,but that is another issue), THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT LOCATION FOR IT. A residential area is the wrong place for a facility like this,and the Zoning Board's duty in this instance is to deny a special exception because the residents of the area oppose it. While my opposition to the facility rests on the traffic,noise pollution and congestion it will bring to our quiet residential community,what will be even worse will be the inevitable failure of the project. The facility as proposed would need a large number of consistently paid up members in order to turn a profit,and for a summer community,that is a very tall order. Should the business fail,we will be left with a huge empty building and land cleared of trees and animals. The 21 acre parcel in question will go from being a beautiful part of our town to an ugly eyesore and possible trouble spot from which no one will, least of all the town,will benefit. 0i I demand that the Zoning Board do its duty and find that this facility cannot realistically be a true membership club, in which case the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East for a variance must therefore be denied. Very truly yours, r Linda A.Mule cc: Supervisor Scott Russell Southold Town Board All Members of the Southold Town Board 0 � Jo-Ann Lechner " ) 1415 Marlene Lane JUL 3 ���� Mattituck, NY July 29, 2017 I -Al:221" Dear Ms. Leslie Weisman-Chair Zoning Board of Appeals: 5pr-) I am writing to you because I have great concerns regarding the development of the 20+acre parcel of land owned by Mr. Paul Pawlowski and the proposal by him and his partners to develop this property into the Sports East Fitness endeavor. Mr. Pawlowski is in the process of requesting that special exception be given under the special exception standard. I have read his application and attended the April 25th monthly meeting of the Mattituck Laurel Civic Association which only adds to my concerns and more questions. I have been informed that there will be another meeting of the ZBA regarding Sports East as Mr. Pawlowski filed a resubmission of his plans. I called the ZBA office this morning to see if I could acquire a copy of his resubmission and was informed that I could go to your office and apply for this information under the freedom of information request. I would then be allowed to review Mr. Pawlowski's resubmission. Unfortunately I am not available during office hours. Therefore I would like to update my views based upon additional reading, research and attending the MLCA meeting. Nature of Business; As reported by Lisa Finn (Patch Staff), December 16, 2016, Mr. Pawlowski provided, "Our goal with the revised submission is to be in line with the definition of the code. We added more outside amenities to make it primarily an outside club; however,we are still offering indoor amenities for the winter months." Plans include outdoor tennis, golf practice areas,fields, a par course, an accessory pool,food service and gym, Paul Pawlowski said. Removed from the original plan are batting cages and the rock wall, Pawlowski said. "We basically want to mirror what we have outdoors and offer that in the winter months," he said. The footprint of the building plan has been scaled down, from 144,000 square feet to 82,500 feet, Pawlowski said. What is this the nature of this Business? We now know that this facility will be a not-for-profit entity. The proposed developed property will be taken off the real estate tax rolls. Mr. Pawlowski answered this question at the MLCA meeting. He stated he is not asking the town to help develop this property, therefore indicating a not-for- profit entity should not be a problem. He and his partners will be using all of the Towns Services, making a very good return on their investment and paying no Federal, State and Local Taxes. Many people in our community are on a fixed income and do not want to pay his taxes on a Commercial Recreational Facility. It is not difficult to get not-for- profit status from the federal government. Once he gets that status I believe it would be very hard for the Town to deny the facility tax exempt status on the property. This proposed project has been called a Membership Club; a Private Sports Club, and an Athletic Club. I believe that this facility will be a Commercial Recreational Facility with day and after school care with a large summer camp program. There are 244 parking spaces which the partner's project will be filled. A question was asked regarding bringing in outside competitive teams to compete on the outdoor courts, The response was that no teams will be brought in. Then it was stated that there would be teams brought in to compete. There will be outdoor tennis courts, one artificial turf fields as well as a vast indoor facility. It was also stated that the teachers are very happy because they will have summer jobs, The only way that there would be so many summer jobs for teachers is if there is a summer camp, not for just member's children but for the all residence of the towns in Southold and Riverhead.The only way this project is financially viable is with a large summer camp and day care. The Patch also reported that Mr. Pawlowski indicated that there will be a par course. If this indication is true, does this mean that there will also be a golf course on the property? There are many golf courses in the area, do we really need another one that will use extensive water,fertilizers and weed killers. This was not in the initial application. This will increase the excessive water usage past the 15,000 gallons a day which the initial application anticipated. i The developers stated that they are modeling the facility after Southampton Youth Services recreation center. Southampton offers summer camp that is contracted to an outside organization. Based upon,the number of parking spaces; modeling their I r 0 0 -101 k program after Southampton Youth Services, a not-for-profit; providing jobs for teachers during the summer;the vast outside fields as well as the size of this entire project; intermural with schools etc.,this could lead to the conclusion that this endeavor will have a full summer camp up and running on this property, as does Southampton Youth Services. There would be constant noise from sunup until sundown that would exceed ambient noise levels. Mr. Pawlowski has stated this is a private membership club. What does annual membership club really mean? It appears that any business that offers annual membership can open on property that has a zoning of residential with exceptions. For example BJs, Costco, Sam's Club are all membership driven. Any type of business can offer annual membership and say they are membership driven and will be beneficial to the community. Is this really what the town's forefathers were thinking when they placed the exemption for annual membership clubs? If the town approves this project on this land, it is opening up Pandora's Box as any large business with any type of membership can and will ultimately apply and or bring litigation against the Town for the right to build on residential property that is also zoned for exceptions. Sewage and Water: The project is huge and will produce an enormous amount of sewage and water runoff from blacktop, building roof and the outdoor courts. Our bay and sound are already compromised by nitrogen pollution. Tyrand Fuller, lead hydrogeologist for the Suffolk County Water Authority stated;this, by far, is one of the most sensitive areas on the Island. County Legislator Al Krupski, our Supervisor and members of the Town Board have all spoken about the importance of protecting the North Fork's fresh water supply as well as our estuaries. Our Councilman Robert Ghosio stated, "The aquifers we have is truly owned by the people, everybody, and how we use that and how it can be detrimental to each other is an important issue to me." Excessive nitrogen pollution from sewage has caused massive fish kills,turtle die offs, and toxic algae blooms, closing beaches and water bodies around Long Island. Nitrogen pollution threatens our environment, health, economy, and quality of life. Long Island's clean waters create jobs and generate hundreds of millions of dollars every year for our regional economy. The Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan,2010(SCCWRMP)strongly links development to excess nitrogen loadings. In a simulation model, densities of two-acre zoning produced nitrogen of 6-10 mg/L. Therefore, even with a two acre zoning as maximum density, it is still well over the maximum nitrogen target that the Peconic Estuary Program identifies as 0.4 to 0.45 mg/L. In addition,the density in many of our coastal areas produces over 20 times the Peconic Estuary total maximum daily load (TMDL)goal in sensitive marine environments, such as the Peconic Estuary. Nitrogen pollution in water is directly tied to development patterns, land use trends,fertilizer use,failing sewers, residential cesspools, and septic systems. In short—the majority of nitrogen is from sewage. Scientists agree that harmful toxic tides are being fueled by nitrogen from wastewater, including septic tanks and cesspools. The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation cites algal blooms and excessive nitrogen as the primary reasons many of Long Island's water bodies are impaired. These toxic algal blooms,often referred to as Red Tide or Brown Tide,can spread hazardous toxins, kill fish, and seriously impair water quality. Governor Cuomo and the NYS Legislature acknowledge that there is need for a plan that will tackle Long Island's nitrogen pollution problem, This plan will identify critical projects, including upgrades to sewage and septic systems,which are necessary to protect our water resources and our communities. Newsday ran many articles regarding how water ways need more environmental protection from sewage. These include Suffolk County as well as the Town of Brookhaven who wants to implement standards that will be stronger than the County. There have been meetings of our elected officials from the state, county and towns; they understand if nitrogen pollution is not reduced our towns we will lose two industries,fishing and tourism. This proposed project lies between Peconic Bay and Laurel Preserve. According to the papers filed,this project does adjoin wetlands/water bodies that are regulated by Federal, State or Local Agencies and are over a sole source aquifer. The initial project anticipates a water usage of 15,000 gallons a day and 3,660 of raw sewage. It would appear that the resubmission is adding a golf club which would require well over 15,000 gallons of water a day. 0 N 1 oe� How can we justify putting this enormous project in place when it will greatly increase nitrogen pollution from sewage and water runoff with no way to eliminate nitrogen pollution? Will there be a treatment plant established to take all nitrogen out of the sewage before it is returned to the ground? Will there be some type of water system where water can be captured, purified, and recycled? This proposed project requires substantial water. There is a water problem on the east end. Salt water is seeping into fresh. Last year the Town of Riverhead requested that its' residence curtail water usage as their pumps were at maximum capacity. The Suffolk County Water Authority had meeting with the community regarding water usage and how we need to conserve. With the pull of so much water, how does the Town accommodate this project and protect our drinking water? Traffic; Noise;Air Pollution: Traffic Congestion-This area of Main Road is so congested it is almost impossible to get into and out of streets and parking lots.The Old Capital One building must be taken into consideration. This business property is sub- dividable and multi-use, There is additional traffic from the location of the Hudson City Bank site and a new two story building at the same location. The Department of Transportation would not approve any entrances or exits from the CVS parking lot on to Main Road because of congestion.This project will substantially add to the traffic congestion that already exists in this area. The Mattituck Business Corridor Study was completed in January 2011. Traffic congestion has increased dramatically since this study was completed. Two of the goals reached in this study regarding traffic were to control intensity of development so that current roadway capacity is not exceeded and minimize transportation related conflicts generated from land use transitions. Part of the study relied on the Traffic Impact Analysis performed by JP Morgan Bank. This study was performed in November, 2009. The study indicated that the Level of Service(LOS) at the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road in November, 2009 was a"C", and the proposed development, JP Morgan Bank will result in additional delay causing the Level of Service to deteriorate from LOS C to LOS D. The study goes on to say that the cumulative impact of multiple, even minor applications will continue to deteriorate the level of service on the roadway. Since this study was completed there have been new developments completed which have added to traffic congestion. These include a bank and a two story professional medical building where the first floor was changed from profession to retail. These developments severely impacted the level of service on Main Road. This part of a Main Road resembles Riverhead with its'traffic congestion. I do not believe the Town of Southold would want to add to the congestion in this area which would affect all residence. Widening the road would change the character of the Town forever. Residences have overwhelmingly indicated that they want to maintain their quality of life, enhance the historic character and protect environmental resources and lands. Air—There will be increased emissions from buses, cars, delivery and garbage trucks entering and exiting the parking lot, as well as the additional traffic on 25 to get to the destination. There will also be increased emissions from these vehicles' sitting in the parking lot with their engines running. This must be taken into consideration with 244 parking spaces. Approximately 7 acres of trees will be removed. Removal of these trees will have an adverse impact to the community via air and noise pollution. Trees cool the air; land and water with shade and moisture thus reduce the heat island effect of our communities.A single tree can produce the cooling effect of 10 room size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day. One large tree can supply a day's supply of oxygen for four people. A healthy tree can store 13 pounds of carbon each year which reduces the"greenhouse effect",for an acre of trees that equals to 2.6 tons of carbon dioxide. Trees help reduce surface water runoff, decrease soil erosion and increase ground water recharge. Each gallon of gasoline burned produces almost 20 pounds of carbon. There are 244 parking spaces. How many more pounds of carbon will be produced in this one small area that has more traffic congestion than it can handle. Noise-The project will be open all week at 5:00 am; close Monday—Saturday at 10:00 pm; Sunday close is 7:00 pm. Outdoor fields will be available, at this time until dark. Plans have been made for 244 vehicles, There will be buses, delivery trucks, garbage trucks, cars and increased traffic. . I 1 0 0 The Full Environmental Assessment Form provides: "Will the proposed action plan produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,operation or both." Response was"Yes; Outdoor multi use field and tennis courts will produce noise exceeding ambient noise levels during operation. It is likely that these noise levels would be generated between 7:00 am-6:00 pm." At this time there appears to be no outdoor lighting for the courts. However, it was stated that the outside courts will be open as long as there is daylight. This means during the summer when our neighbors are trying to enjoy their yards or are just home from work wanting quiet time,the courts and field will be open until the sun goes down. Why must the quality of life,within our community, be disrupted for a commercial recreational facility? Our neighbors should not have to put up with noise levels that exceed ambient noise levels every waking hour,which this commercial recreation facility will produce, for the rest of their lives. The trees that are left standing will block some of the noise, but they will not block all of the vehicle&pedestrian noise until dark at the field and 10:00 pm for the building. What will happen to the quality of life of the individuals who live in our community? Wildlife and Plants: From the application for zoning under the exception rule,the application provides, "Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of special concern."The applicant responded "Yes."Observing this property from Sigsbee, I have seen a turtle and a very strange snake living on this land.What happens to these animals or species of plants either listed or not listed via NYS's as rare or concerned? Conclusion: The plan for this project is huge. This project will produce much traffic congestion, sewage,water runoff, noise; all environmental polluters. The quality of life will not be the same for the families and our neighbors who live and travel around this area of Mattituck. I thought the people of our Town wanted to keep"that small town feeling"which includes respect for our neighbors, as well as keeping the two industries that add to our Towns coffer, namely tourism and fishing. These industries afford the Town with much of its revenues,with very little town services and in turn reduces every residences real estate taxes. Our Town is trying to cut pollution as it is causing destruction of our estuary and ecological systems which affects all residence of the Town of Southold. How is the Town going to address this vast project with forward thinking? This project, most likely a not-for-profit,will have the availability of all Town Services paid for by Town residence, as the property will be taken off the tax rolls and the principals will benefit financially at the expense of the Town residences, many whom are on a fixed income. The Southampton Youth Services recreation center is not near a residential areas or a congested area. Maximus gym is also located in a business district. This project should only be allowed if placed in a business zone, all environmental issues must be addressed and every residence agrees to have a substantial tax increase, Many of the services that this endeavor provides are already provided by our Schools and Parks, which are paid for by real estate taxes. Suffolk Community College is providing a gym facility which includes a pool. This land once developed would be an ideal hang out for teenagers as it is enclosed by trees. Will there by 24 hour guard service to stop the congregation of teenagers with and without cars? Based upon the facts above, I respectfully request that the resubmission of this application be denied. Respectfully, (/O-KR ZmXye- Jo-Ann Lechner Fuentes, Kim From: Jo-Ann <chrisesplace@verizon.net> Sent: Monday,July 31, 2017 9:33 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Sports East Resubmission Attachments: 20 acres zba Lechner -July 2017.docx Good Morning Ms. Weisman, Please find attached my thoughts regarding the Sports Ease resubmission request for special exception. I have updated my concerns regarding the original submission. According to an article in the Suffolk Times dated July 6, 2017, Mr. Pawlowski states that he now has a Facebook page to gain public support. He provides that he has 450 likes with positive comments. These likes can be from all over the United States. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns. Respectfully, Jo-Ann Lechner Fuentes, Kim From: peg toner <pegtoner@msn.com> Sent: Saturday,July 29, 2017 3:03 PM o ������ To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Palowski property - Special exception D JUL 3 1 1017 TO: Chairperson and Zoning Board Members BY. ia. I own a home on Sigsbee Rd. When I purchased this very expensive property,I did so knowing that there was a possibility of homes being built on the subject property. I would never have expected to have the possibility of a Sports Facility being constructed there. As a concerned citizen who, like my neighbors, am adamantly opposed to the granting of a Special Exception to construct a Sports Club in R80 Zoned District. The proposed facility would have a devastating impact on the safety and nature of Sigsbee rd., as well as the surrounding community. The 21 acre parcel is a beautiful part of our town. Creating a Sports Facility with both indoor and outdoor use will convert this pristine land to an eyesore and trouble spot. We have several concerns such as increased traffic to Sigsbee Rd because of the proposed right turn only exit from the Facility because westbound motorists will make that right turn and then a right turn on Sigsbee to travel west on Peconic Bay Blvd. That will create a significant amount of increased traffic on Sigsbee Rd. Another concern is the increased noise coming from an unsightly Morris Buiding as well as noise coming from the outdoor activities. Safety and security are primary concerns due to the fact that vehicles can enter at night and be almost invisible from the Main Road. That situation can invite any and all kinds of trouble and vandalism to nearby homes. It has the potential to be a splendid "hangout" and trouble spot. Some may say that the proposed facility is needed in the area ..THIS LOCATION IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT THE BEST LOCATION for it. I urge the Zoning Board DO NOT GRANT the Special Exception. Sincerely, Margaret Toner 1 BOARD MEMBERS QF $O(/T Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� /y® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora J�6 Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer ® �Q 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento l�C®UNil Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 2017: 1:00 P.M. — SPORTS EAST PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP CLUB — PAUL PAWLOWSKI #7091- Request for an interpretation, pursuant to Article XXVI, § 280-146D of the Town Code, in response to the Building Inspector's April 26, 2017 Notice of Disapproval that the proposed use, as applied for, is not a permitted use in the R-80 Zoning District pursuant ,to the Zoning Board of Appeals Code Interpretation #6976. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: July 20, 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 02097430 _ { STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck,in said county,being duly sworn,says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES , a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks(s),successfully commencing on 07/27/2017 Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of CHRISTINA VOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 VOb 105050 Qualified In Suffolk Counfy My COf1 MI010n Expires February 28,2020 � (U , AUG u 2017EI r � TYPESET Mon Jul 24 15 34.11 EDT 2017 tion 280-116 A&B;and the Building In- LEGAL NOTICE spector's February 17, 2017, Amended SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD April 3,2017,April 20,2017 and June 23, OF APPEALS 2017 Notice of Disapproval based on an THURSDAY,AUGUST 3,2017 application for a permit to construct addi- PUBLIC HEARINGS tions and alterations to an existing single NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to family dwelling and to construct an in- Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code ground swimming pool,at:1)proposed ac- Chapter 280(Zoning),Town of Southold,the cessory structure is located in other than following public hearings will be held by the tite code required rear yard;2) proposed SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF construction located less than the code re- APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main quired 100 feet from the top of bluff;lo- Road,P.0 Box 1179, Southold,New York cated; at: 4800 Paradise Point Road, 11971-0959,on THURSDAY,AUGUST 3, Southold,NY.SCTM#1000-81-3-3. 2017. 11:15 A.M.-JOHN HEEG AND GIA FIS- 9:30 A.M - DIMITRIOS ANTONIADIS CHETTI HEEG#7075SE-Applicants re- #7068-Request for a Variance under Arti- quest a Special Exception under Article III, cle XXII,Section 280-116 and the Building Section 280-13B(13). The Applicants are Inspector's March 15,2017,Notice of Dis- owners of subject property requesting a approval based on an application for a per- permit to make additions and alterations to mit to construct additions and alterations and convert an existing accessory barn into to an existing single family dwelling,at:1) an Accessory Apartment that exceeds the located less than the code required 100 feet maximum 750 sq.ft.in livable floor area from the top of the bluff-,at:3300 North and contains more than one permitted Sea Drive, (Adj. to Long Island Sound) bathroom,at:1945 Westphalia Road,Mat- Orient,NY.SCTM#1000-15-1-4. tituck,NY.SCTM#1000-141-1-3. 9:40 A.M.LOU PAGNUTTI#7069-Re- 11:30 A.M. - JOHN HEEG AND GIA quest for Variances under Article XXIH, FISCHETTI HEEG #7076- Request for Section 280-124 and the Building Inspec- Variances under Article III, Section tor's March 30, 2017, Notice of Disap- 280-15,Article IV,Section 280-19 and the proval based on an application for a permit Building Inspector's December 28,2016, to construct additions and alterations to an Amended January 3,2017 Notice of Dis- existing single family dwelling, at: 1) lo- approval based on an application for a per- cated less than the code required minimum mit to make additions and alterations to side yard setback of 15 feet;2)located less and convert an existing accessory barn into than the code required total side yard set- an Accessory Apartment,at 1)located less back of 35 feet;at:57475 County Road 48, than the code required minimum side yard (Adj. to Long Island Sound) Greenport, setback of 15 feet;2)proposed accessory NY.SCTM#1000-44-2-5. structure exceeding the code permitted 10:15 A.M.-DESPINA GIANOPULOS maximum 750 square feet in total size,at: LANDERS/LANDERS FAMILY TRUST, 1945 Westphalia Road, Mattituck, NY. LLC#7072 Request for Variances under SCTM#1000-141-1-3. Article XXH,Section 280-116B and Article 1:00 P.M.—SPORTS EAST PRIVATE XXIH,Section 280-124 and the Building MEMBERSHIP CLUB — PAUL PAW- Inspector's April 10,2017,Amended June LOWSKI#7091-Request for an interpre- 9,2017 Notice of Disapproval based on an tation,pursuant to Article XXVI, § 280- application for a permit to construct addi- 146D of the Town Code,in response to the tions and alterations and to legalize an"as Building Inspector's April 26,2017 Notice built"deck addition to an existing single of Disapproval that the proposed use,as family dwelling,at:1)located less than the applied for,is not a permitted use in the code required minimum front yard setback R-80 Zoning District pursuant to the Zon- of 35 feet, 2) located less than the code ing Board of Appeals Code Interpretation required minimum rear yard setback of 35 #6976; located, at: 9300 NYS Route 25, feet,3)located less than the code required Mattituck,NY.SCTM#1000-122-7-9. minimum side yard setback of 10 feet,4) The Board of Appeals will hear all persons more than the code permitted maximum or their representatives,desiring to be.heard at lot coverage of 20%; at: 5705 Stillwater each hearing,and/or desiring to submit writ- Avenue,(Adjacent to Eugene's Creek)Cut- ten statements before the conclusion of each chogue,NY.SCTM#1000-137-4-4. hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier 10:30 A.M.-THOMAS PILESKI#7073 than designated above.Files are available for -Request for a Variance under Article HI, review during regular business hours and Section 280-15 and the Building Inspec- prior to the day of the hearing If you have tor's April 13,2017 Notice of Disapproval questions,please contact our office at,(631) based on an application for a permit to 765-1809, or by email KimF@ construct an accessory garage,at: 1)pro- southoldtownnygov posed accessory garage exceeding the code Dated-July 20,2017 permitted maximum 750 square feet in to- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS tal size;at: 1250 Elijahs Lane,Mattituck, LESLIE KANES WEISMAN,CHAIRPER- NY.SCTM#1000-108-3-5.11. SON 10:45 A.M -JENNIFER PLACE#7074 BY Kim E.Fuentes - Request for a Variance under Article 54375 Main Road(Office Location) XXIH, Section 280-124 and and the 53095 Main Road(Mailing/USPS) Building Inspector's March 1, 2017, PO Box 1179 Amended March 17,2017 Notice of Disap- Southold,NY 11971-0959 proval based on an application for a permit 2097430 to construct additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling, at: 1) lo- cated less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet;at:750 Liberty Lane,Southold,NY.SCTM#1000-79-6-27. 11:00 A.M.-SERENITY IN PARADISE #7077-Request for Variances under Arti- cle III,Section 280-15;Article XXII,Sec- � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of MAILINGS Paul Pawlowski (Name of Applicants) SCTM Parcel# f000= 122-7-9 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK I, Iwona Kodym residing at Bergen Avenue, Mattituck, NY New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: Otithe 17 day of July ,20 17f personally mailed at the United States Post_Office in Riverhead , New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a tru6 copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown ort the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the(g)Assessors,or( ) County Real Property Office for every property wEuch abuts and is across a public or private street, or-vehicular right of-way of record,surrounding the-applicant's property_ LLO y-a— - (Signature) Sworn td before me this Ck V day of -5U\-t ,20 PATRICIA A.CLARK Notary Public,State of New York �_ No.01CLb711005 ftmI'fied In Suffolk Count/ {Notary P�ciblic) Cwnbsion E*Irea September3Q��% _ PLEAgE Inst on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you c fl- SCTM#1000-143-1-4.1 -k,I Margaret Noone 210 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-143-1-5 Debra J. Timpone 360 Sigsbee Rd. Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-143-1-6 IPPC Inc. 4248 Grand Avenue Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-143-1-7 Abraham A. Garcia Sharon A. Rodriguez 885 Lincoln Pl. North Bellmore,NY 11710 SCTM#1000-143-1-8 James A. Hines 333 E 43`d Street, Apt. 709 New York,NY 10017 SCTM#1000-143-1-9 Doreen Sidor 645 Mill Creek Dr. Southold,NY 11971 SCTM#1000-143-1-10 Hrisovalantis Souravlis Ana Souravlis 21-36 38th Street Astoria,NY 11105 SCTM#1000-143-1-11 Mary L. Berninger 910 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-144-1-1 Moreno J A& C Revocable Trust 2301 Aspen Way Boynton Beach, FL 33436 SCTM#1000-144-1-2 ® � John P. Toner Margaret K. Toner PO Box 362 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-144-1-3 Vishnudat Seodat Savitrie S. Seodat 580 Lloyds Ln. Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-144-1-4 Linda Mule Felix Mule 118-18 Union Tpke. Apt. 12E Kew Garden,NY 11415 SCTM#1000-144-1-5.2 Ronald A. McGrath Patricia McGrath 15 Canterbury Rd. Old Brookville,NY 11545 SCTM#1000-144-1-6.2 J T&P J Sarno Trust 519 Dallam Ct. Bel Air, MD 21014 SCTM#1000-144-1-7 Elizabeth Citti 1480 Sigsbee Rd. Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-144-1-8 Kimmarie Hammond 252-15 60th Ave. Little Neck,NY 11362 SCTM#1000-144-1-9 Elizabeth A. Cassidy 1560 Sigsbee Rd. Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-122-6-12 Capt Red's Marine Sales PO Box 528 Mattituck,NY 11952 00 SCTM41000-122-6-13 Michael Hughes Therese Hughes PO Box 1282 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-122-6-14 Michael Hughes Therese Hughes PO Box 1282 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-122-6-17 Keil Farms LLC 30 Eastgate Dr. Huntington,NY 11743 SCTM#1000-122-6-18 Mariusz Jachimowicz 9395 Rte. 25 Mattituck,NY 11952 S CTM#1000-122-6-19.2 9255 Main Road LLC PO Box 645 Mattituck,NY 11952 S CTM#1000-122-6-22.1 9025 Main Road LLC 10095 Main Road, Unit 4 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM41000-122-7-8.9 Mega Styl LLC PO Box 56 Mattituck,NY 11952 SCTM#1000-143-1-1 May&Tony Inc. 1 West Main Street Hampton Bays,NY 11946 r ■ • IL �I CERTIFIED � O r e T CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT GE i I• Only I• - il Only 1 ' •- - I o Wt NATTY PUIL jIY;i °952 • � � � � IIAT�5�TI UI �=�Y 1 2' � ((� �� .F , i fLl Certfied'Mall Fee, 3 ?r� t •} . co $ $3.35 R09 4 W Certified Mail Fee 0901 0 �a $s.35. I iT1 .Extra Services$Fees(checkbox addfeewp(jate/ /s `�I��y� I'll $ 2 7 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Ftp•r�,l,+ ,S �,. + Extra ServICeS$FeeS(checkbw;add lee ,go:t'eodate) "°' 7 ❑Return Recelpt(electronic) $ i� ;G' N ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ FLr �,J,,�U, C� \ O ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ � t t� Postmark ('{( 1 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $X11_ 10 Postmna ❑Adult Signature Required _ �A 't�dre 1 C3 ❑Cert�ed Mall Restricted Delivery $ - J� fl He $- $£� 01' h ;n Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ® El Adult Signature Required $ [Ir7i'. 97 M Postag 1 - �� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ i $ �_ p ) O postage P►1 1-•o Total Postage and F$1]s 49 47/126 ! .moo $ $►7.49 Cil�Y`7/24 O � ,59 Total Postage and Fes '0461$ i $ 0S 1 t �� �u7 Sent To N Sent To ,-a Michael & Therese Hughes ra IPPC Inc. StfeetandApt No..$`(�°2061282 IO Crry"State ZlP ®- - -------=--------------------------------= l`- sC--rt-1y-1 n -o. ---------------- - ---- tateZ-P-4- attituck NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 :II , _ _ - 11 111•1. I I :11 1 I I 111•1• Postal — -- - - - CERTIFIED • IL@ RECEIPT U.S. ■ • 0 Domestic Mail Only i MAI RECEIPT !ra i� Domestic Mail Only J .n I ifI � n—Y rt ( OEM' r a zea RJ Certified Mall Fee e j NE Y RL w) �} m $ $3.3�r ) D•7 f�Ll Certrfied Mall Fee $3.35 ' f19�i17 - Extra Services$Fees(checkbox,add fee�s,�Ppp7p�are cp $ rU ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $,- 7rlr■6 m _ ; E[]R Services$Fees(check box,add fee ate) &tj C3 ❑❑Return d Mail (electronic)Delivery $s-111-00 1-- a�g alk��� 4 ru ❑Retum Receipt t(hardcopy) $ . ( Certified Mail Restricted Dehv s0•0� O e u e-T6 ' � r�f, Postmark O ❑Adult Signature Required $ tpttf1 ,�•',Ah -=:J ❑Return Recei (electronic) $ yy h44 'iFi 4� ON �' ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ T7� H `��� �C ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ,; O []Adult Signature Required $-- r n j $Ste a $0.49 ^j�,� �j a/ r E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ o Total Postage and#S o 59 07/I117��� f t Postage $0.44 {�L21�1' $ I Total Postage and Fees �j e r� Sent To $ $6.59 a.Jf E3 Doreen Sidor " ,,,.,-dor Sent TO`+ a`1�P 'rl�°"'8roeoeO CN�r------------------------------------------------- -q James=A. Hines- --------------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- ---------- ---------- -7-9--------------------------- 37+°3rd°Bo�nlo.Apt. 709 Ciry,State, 0uthOld NY 1"19 crry,-siaie;ziP+drew York; NY 1-daI"� :11 1 I I 111•1• • -_• —___�. - I :11 1 I I 111•1• - i Postal ■ . ra CERTIFIE • , RECEIPT MAIL .0 DOM�Sticmail only ra I. ED • - _ -D-0 swumto _ I Ln i W Cert�ed Mall Fee tco $ $3.35 rLi) G9Ci107 I, $ertrfied Mall Fee $2.75 G 4� R I Extra Services$Fees(checkbox,add lee�Sr�p re l ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ity•uV ~��„ IJ I Q 17 ill l f t �`` r1l Extra Services$Fees(check bar add tee are) ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Q_�i�(i POS ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ � []Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ rl_I ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ,�rla Pe O []Adult Signature Required $ - Hero ;C3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ b�' A— G He Elf OY V O Adult Signature Restncted Delivery$ Cl Adult Signature Required $ Postage • 1101 L I y!!) $ $0 49 i AduttSgnatureRestnctedDeiivery$ • f p Postage 07/17/2017 . C3 Total Postage and Feel�s �' 7/17/2017` $ $. $O.59 A 1 1-0 Total Postage and a � Sent To �V �` $ I Abraham_Garcia & Sharon Rodriguez _ i ui Li 1) s Marine Sales-------------------------------------- C3 Street a or PC7 B x o � 'A inCo� P1. p of PO o.-- ------------------------------------------------- ®-- ---o------------------------------------------ ClryStateZIP+4® ----------------- 1 r�- oX �North Bellmore, NY 11710 ttituck, NY 11952 U. 1 11 111•1• _- D • stal Service PostalService © RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT � CERTIFIED MAIL 1. � I• I . o iru N110911 Er I n Ln6It r r BOY"f�iE�H� 34 � t17 %744 JI & �, r(j Certified Mail Fee -,C 0901 � Certfied Mail Fee $3.35 9 11�a m $ $3.35 3•'35 $ ? Cj ,!'" _ -„s 1-Irr} + z. Extra Services$Fees(check box,add fee p��ete) r1l Extra Services$Fees(checkbar,add tee�gopmwate) V l �r:� N ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ - •",--1"f•' S d S ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ •t..''•4Vf,UU,-- ` ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ..Y4� POStma l 3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �1 t1.Lr V ��j,J� rk Cl ❑Certified Mali Restncted Delivery $ �.r�j�( f Here ❑Certified Mall Restricted Derive ���� O ry $ $A•Off ""`i Herm C Adult Signature Required $fir- //® •O ❑Adult Signature Required $ Il•�1� ;n"'1 !.n I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ b l Z!{ I O Postage Signature Restricted Delivery$ 7�J �� j 0 Postage $O•49 L $ $0'49 n f-0 Total Postage,and Fees 7 IaSZl17/2111'7/ ` 47 17'2417 10 ��?!'- -� Totes Postage and e s �... i I 1 $ $�•5q �o '�E.59 -- $ Ln Sent To •i Ln Sent To 11 ,a J_A__& C__Moeno_Revocable__Trust_________________ ___ r-a eil Farms LLC CJ dA t$ orP oxlJo ------ --- I T` �� �sp6n Vay O e nd ?No.,or P x No. -------- -- --- -- -------- `'as ate r. -- -- ---------------------------------------------------- g crty;"Siaie zl Bo nton Beach, FL 33436 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .- City,State,Z/P+4® - - Huntin ton NY 11743 °" '• "''' ' 1 1 1 1 1 111• � JU.S. P• Postal CERTIFIkD o e o ■ i I Domestic Mail Only !W Domestic Mail Only E3 1 I C3 iu, ,,n MAT ;IlllllUOs�Y1 fU Certified Mall Fee $7 3= (� Certified Mad Fee Q i fn Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee fopptgpdate) > m Extra Services Fees(checkbox add ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1,,•VVl�r ^ ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ $�} �(a r\ �•+ I fU ❑Return Receipt(elec ronlc) $ $ 1 O ® fU ' �Po t ark J C7 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ - ;ostmark C7 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ $I J JCJ � je�0 7/jr - J� ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ _ Cii�;H' ere C7 ❑Adult Signature Required $ �,$ ! ,•I ❑Aduk Signature Required $ f []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 1 []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ p Postage $0.49 �� ��� J C7 Postage Total Postage and Fags 9 U7'/i / r117 O Total Postage and Fees $ b�■ $ $6.59 Ir) SeI°M�°riusz Jachimowicz Ln Sent To � ra 9255_ Main_ Road LLC C7 §treat Q i PO- ------------------------------ -------------------- f7 & n L No r O Bax No. --------------------------------------- -------------- City;Stale,ZIP+4®, - -- - ' '- ! Cary state ZIP+4® - - -------------------=--------------- ! Mattituck NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 -OS,Fq��-�oo,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9047 See,Reverse for Instructionsr i TM • j U.S. ' • 1CERTIFIED MAIILP RECEIPT 1CERTIFIED MAI'L@ RECEIPT Domestic s ` C7 r' 1 Domestic Mail Only, - nj s 17ae • e • RJ ILr) TI ( �Y 1 � �J"�.� L � AST�1lEE� � � �i �; 13 wr IU Fee C u1 cc .'3tir IrU Certified Mail Fee $3.t!, 3.ta, _ 0901 flI $ �� Extra Services&Fees(eheckbox add fe_e epp{p{}rfate) � r m eipt(hardcopy) $ tJ■�1 tl rJ ��iq Ectfa Services&FeeS(checkbox,addfee pp�pggata)0 eipt(electronic) $ $� �� 9 1 ❑Retum Receipt(h=Phl) $ r a lJlt e°•""'�"�`�il Restricted Derive Fi95tmark C3 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Q Delivery $ ■�J�J t`• �! I y a ❑Cert�ed Mail Restricted Delivery $ �� .f� P Here ❑AdultSignatureRequired, $ I / "� K j []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ __- Y _ /� I Adult Signature Required $ ❑Aduk Signature Restdcted Deilvery$ -' ` I O Postage - � I �- ' , $l7.49 ® /' 'p Postage q/' Total Postage and Fees il� l� 1 $ $0.49"' J C7 $f!■ !� Total Postage and Fees v /1-7/2(11` $6:59 b�Fab J Ln Sent To - _ "$ - � ' - . ul Sent-To 9025:Main'Road_LLC___ !g Hrisovalanfis & An_ a Souraylis__--------------------- r _ j r �q �.,(�(o or P�Box A(o -------------------------------=----------- ��7pMa in 02 Q, Unit 4 J C7 Street and ApL No.,o�PO Box lYo."" -------------- crry;'sieie;ZlP+4®Matttucrc, " I�952-------------------' Ity, ate,Z +4h:S�� t - - c Astoria NY 11105 U.S. Postal Service"m Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAILORECEIPT o RECEIPT M Domestic Mail Only l M Ditimestic�Mail Only o o 'For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.' ,Ln u7 ib !' 4%0 V� a ?) rU Certified Mad Fee $3.35 (1901 I fU Certified Mail Fee 5 '1 �1 1 $3.3.x' ifT'1 Extra Services&Fees(cheekbox,add fee pyprpppaie) R I V 07' I m Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee ppjgpgate) ❑Return Recelpt(hardcopy), $ 1ta�■11�r14.�r ❑Retum Receipt(iardcopy) $ Lt for ' El Return Recelpt(electronic) .$ Q�.f10 Primark;`��. 1 O ❑Return (electronic) $ t1.�It1 Postmark E:3 `❑Ceitified Mail Restricted Delivery $ tk z1 to C� o ❑Caddied Mall Restricted Delivery $ J,��� ® j!(//y/�{0(�e I ❑Adult Signature Required $•• x ', I r3 []Adult Signature Required $� $ ""f y's []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Ln v []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C3 Postage N j,$uC7 'Postage $1.49 .t 1�T Total Postage and F$ee6s. � 07 1 6 f Total Postage and Vs.54 $ $ C ir)- Sent S tyl LLC f Ll Sent To j m ega I --------- ------------------------------------------------------ May &_ Tony Inc. C] Streat an t . or P�Box iVo. I M Sliest soil t No of PO Boz No."""---"""""-"""""""""""""-""- �,-. $23 fax l� I[�. Ap - ---Wast--Main._.Straet-----------------:'------------------------------ CityCiry State,ZIP+4®' - - State,ZIP+4 Mattituck NY 11952Ham ton Ba s, NY 11946 r, r,r _ I Postal1ceI iU,.S. Postal Service -- - - - TM 1CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT CERTIFIED M.AIV RECEIPT J Irl Domestic • C3 . Ir 'MATT IC>' Y, 1 � • r �� •r 1� U MATT�� U I i S' ,:; JU Certified Mad Fee a (1901 I Ir) �x J �d Y ' Co $3.3J - rU Certified Mail Fee e M Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee s��p ata) .`y' 1 907N. m $ $�■�� C 1�•- �J7� ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ �•`• -\ J Extra Services&Fes(checkbox,add fee app ate) J {•� nj ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ P ark,,, ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy). $ li•ltU \ \1t E]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ e O ru ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 1' Postmark � ❑Adult Signature Required $ �• >1I E]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ��J-lere []Adult Signature RestnctedDairvery$ 'V C7 ❑AduftSignature Required .$ . M Postage y\` Jv ^ []Adult Signature Restrfcted Delivery$ !' $ $J7�■49 � 07/1712t�16`s�' o Postage $0.49 �,�� Total Postage and Fees ' r $ � 1�1 t E3 $ $6.59 O Total Postage and F$e�. 9 Ir) Sent To IS �r4 Mar aret 'Noone Ln Sent To Cr-3 yi f!V"oiPO xlVo x� John___&__Mar �a_xretToner____ f`- M g sir tS BeF9 Fo ad C7 Street a pt o. or P 7tlo. ----------------- ------------------------------------------------ �6o Cdy,State,Z/P+4© ----------------------- - Mattituck, NY 11952 crit'"srara;zTP+4®' """"""""""' "' :.r r r, r.r•�• Mattituck NY 11952 I' fu ®. o rq ...0 e � Certified Mad Fee $3.35 N rg� HT1 $ 9 F.�`� Extra Services&Fees(check box,add feegs,�.fpprlate) 9 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ WIL �tLl�r Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �l j Postrngtl(� Q [I Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $X11 I 1 F�errB�l" t 0 ❑Adult Signature Required E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ p Postage t1.49 0 Total Postage and Fees 7 $ $6.59 ul Sent To a J T & P J�PSaBrpno Trust O siieeianii 4J °lla°llx m°' ---------------------------------------------- Ct. tt CityStafe,ZIP+4®-------------------------------------------------------------------- Bel Air, MD 21014 :ee r ee eee•e _ _ SEN DER',COMPLETE THIS SE&TIOk' COOWOUDELIVERY ture gn ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. S I ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Agent ' so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee j ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,., B Received by ed Nam�e)�q C. Date of Delivery or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Ise! a dress I ' Item1? ❑Yes X99,enter dehve-ry addre low. ❑ No Debra J. Timpone �� a 360 Sigsbee Road 1 Mattituck, NY 11952 _ +v JUL 20,7 2 + 3. e�ce,Type-- ^Priority Mad Express@ ❑Ad tj ature_,_ Registered Mail— �I �I�I�I I II I'I�I�I I I I II II I I II II'I�I �II ❑Adult�g tnrg Re`s d Deli �j�YJj�El Registered Mail Restrictedl ❑Cert fie I �°p 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 89 0CollectonD es SeFPDPLve DMerchandisReturn eptfor ❑Collect on Delivery 2 Article Number ransfer from service label ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature Confirmational _ _ --�--- I ❑Signature Confirmation 7 D 15 0640 - 0002, 3 8 2 5. 6 3 6 7 i stncted Delivery Restricted Delivery i ai I r{ , a i PS orfs oc,i I,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt D • 0 • • • • i ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3. A Signa ure g , ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X rJ El A eat so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee B. RQcel by anted Name) C D tZQ(Ivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, A 1plp`` 11 !� C .� or on the front if space permits. 1 Article Addressed to: D Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below ❑ No Capt Red's Marine Sales PO Box 528 Mattituck, NY 11952 j -- f 3 Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I�Ili�l IIII 11161 X111 I I II��I I II I I I�IIII III SII ❑Adult Signature o Registered Mal ❑ Restricted Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted' ❑Certified Mail@ Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9401 0005 5205 2481 90 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2 Ad._._.. �___�___s ���r vn- _ El Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature ConfirmationTM "� ❑Signature Confirmation ?015 064T0002 : 3825' 5961 'ricted Delivery Restricted Delivery I D 0 ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. SI ure y � Agent ■ Rrint,your name and address on the reverse X V`- Addressee i so-that we can return the card to you. B. Ived y(Pan d Name) C to of, f ehvery ■-Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, `'� zo ' or on the fropt if space permits. . ! LL 1 Article Addressed to D Is delivery add s different from Item 1 ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below ❑ No Michael Hughes Therese Hughes PO Box 1282 Mattituck, NY 11952 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ 11161�1�11161116166111IIII��111111�11161111116 °Adult Signature o RegisteredMailT^ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mad@ Delivery 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 03 0 Certified Mad Restricted Delivery 11 Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise rm ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature Confirmation 2 p tlr la_Number(Transfer`_,from service label), I ❑Signature Confirmation ❑Insured Mail 1 - L -` --- _ &astncted Delivery i �Restricted Delivery 7015 06'40- 00b2 3'8'25 ''5978 1 i 1 Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811;Apfili2015 PSN 7530-02= CERTIFIEDU.S. Postal Service'" i oRECEIPT • )only CERTIFI ED MAIL@ RECEIPT •, • I rl O I Domestic Mail Only I..0 lI ru i MAT 1�1 rY 1 1= L `n MAT� i 1 ,-. J i� Certfied Mail Fee $�. � ,=HY L U ^ $ 0901 "' ru Certified Mall Fee ,�� i M Extra Services&Fees(ch eckbox add fee mate) 07. V n0 $ $3.35 01r [I� rl_I ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $' ,\/ (��� `�,� ryl Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add tee dph_ ate) E3 Return Receipt(electronic) $ '� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ Q O $191 00 a, �� fU ca ❑Cert�ed Mail Restricted Delivery $ ,,, ❑Return Receipt(electronic $ 1 Her ) t�.�}fl �^ Po�[�tark 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ (�� � - C3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $_*� r�r. f{ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ P t�••-rte ! ^ 1 O ❑Adult Signature Required $ C3' Postage Q .•— rfj l ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delvery$ /, $0.49iY� J _ !p Postage -� $ � $0.49 O Total Postage and Fees 1�t.712�7 $ �/- 1 $ $6.59 l J O Total Postage and Fees [17 f hir1�7 L) Sent To `��• $ $6.59 jr-1 ishnudat & Savitrie Seodat Ln Sent To p --- ----------------------------------------- I to Mar L. Bernin er Sweet and A t No.,or P�Boz ldo. ----------- Jy- yC:i ---- g ------------------------------------------------ 5�Il__I)�lods_I,n___________. "--- 1 sbeetandApt.No.,orPCJBozNo. ' c ate,z +4 - - I 91Di�gshe�__Roa d 1 Mattituck, NY 11952 crtyslate,Z + ------------------------------------------ NMI „ , Mattituck, NY 11952 U.S. Postal Service”' U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT .. • !� Domestic Mail • nly iE3 r-1 F6rdelivery Information,visit Our websife at www.usps.corrf'0�, �, MATfiI=� U ,qF � ' MAT `�'I�Y C� fL Certdied Mail Fee IJ7 E $ $3.35 0901 fU Certified Mail Fee $3 3� 0901 Extra Services&Fees(check box add fee ��Ppppppdate) 'co $ • ` 5 w� 07 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ pU.ltU Cpow �T') Extra Services&Fees(check box,add f le,ese9pp ffte)ru �v�' O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ Q .[I ❑Return Receipt(hardwpy) $ i VV V ❑Certrfied Mail Restricted Delivery $ $[�J JQ � ❑Return Receipt(electronle) $ • (V POStm�atQ��0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ $ _ � ❑� �Mail Restricted Delivery $ $.��-flfl He '�`❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ • ❑Adult Signature Required $ \O Posta e I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ A.$ g $0.49 o Postage $0.49 C3 Total Postage and Fegs �7,%� -?1201 7' J�' $ `y0'T�J $e.59 \yJ,l •� Total Postage and Fe s $ _ C3 3�i.59 r. Ln Sent To a Debra J. Tim one ' ! `n Sent To C3 or P ocN --PO xNo to Elizabeth__Citti___________________________________________________ tti e��'�"igs°t5ee Load o sUep apt�v_ steex d. crysraia;zrPattituck TI9�52 r` g = -- ----------- ---- -------- City,Stare,ZIP+4® Mattituck NY 11952 - ----- PS Form 3800,A pril 2615 „ ,,, Postal ,9047 See Reverse for Instructions 1 Service -- - - - - ■ o ■ � • istai service* Ln l•' o RECEIPT • t-9 ! mDomestic Mail Only r deliver�Information,visit our website at wWw.usps.comO. LIRaill E 1P 1Y1�.?62 L U . �(rU Certified ee• 5 t �' MATUM T`_?Y 1 52R A L U CO $ = $3.3,, `___09Gi rU Certified Mail Fee $3 35 0901 M i� 07 ' Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee s�np�/ata) „Cr r ._...,• 1 17J $ 07 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ `�U.Ul! ,�.�'� \ Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee ppf�(�td'ate) !� D f 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ $tl j t(� CYJrr f' r ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ •~"' V ❑Certified Mal Restricted Delivery $ J ,�P _ POSfrnad(�� I I P(electronic) $ $L�.��} ((LL J ff Return Receipt electronic �'c' Postm J ❑Adult Signature Re wiredk 7e i I M ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ $,0.01 , Here 1 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ JUL 1 `011 ;' �� ❑Adult Signature Required $ JUL 17 2011 1 E3 Postage fr ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �- $0.49 7 postage 7/20 r� $0.49 1-•0 Total Postage and Fees � 7 1 E3 $ $6.59 O Total Postage and Fes 0 1 $ .59 uses J Lr) Sent To $ 1 r-1 K M-arie__Hammond__________ Lr) Sent To ;M c o O zlVo. ----------------------------------------- tI Elizabeth_A.__Cassidy r` �`-" `�Of�i �ve. r` Streerl �°igsBee°Rd. City,State,Z/P+4�-------------------------------------------------------------------- 16,_9----- --- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ittle Neck NY 11362 crrysrare,Z/P+4® Mattituck NY 11952 PostalPS Form 3800,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9047 See Reverse for Instructions Service i CERTIFIED I � o CEIPT I ■ oRECEIPT .n Domestic Mail • nly `frl Domestic Mail Only lf` , Ln k�o .— Certified Mail Fee $3.35 (-(_( Certified Mall Fee $3.35 01 E0 $ V `•)e 1 ( 7 i 1�0 $ 79 7 m Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee VLT c:wr)are) \ 1 1 m” Extra Services&Fees(chackbar,edd fee 1 pp.r atell o (}� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $�V U Q o� 1 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ V 4J1, I� , rU ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ . PoSttr�6w i] ❑ru Return Receipt(electronic) $ POc�T tk 0 ❑Certlfied Mail Restricted Delivery $ ,( ilii Hgtg � ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ - ^a p O ❑Adult Signature Required $ 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ t ` [:]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ -[]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ �+/`` C3 Postage $0.49 $Ve 49 C3 Postage 1= $0.49 Total Postage and 0 ' J��2n 1� $ �C7`117Y Us. s59 10 OTa859 $ � ?Ln $ entro ;! a SRonald & Patricia McGrath to Linda &_Felix Mule - Str d L N..or t3 Box No 0 SfieefandAptNo.,orPOBoxNo. � "G�Pdn�er�ury Rd. [`- City;State.ZIP+4®----------------------------- - 1�—L� E--------------------------- - �t rare, IP+4 Old Brookville, NY 11545 Kew Garden, NY 114153800,April 201.5 ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3 7— - address r ❑ Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this Card to the back of the mailpiece, by(Printed Name) C Date of ell ry j ft® or on the front If space permits. r e e l� 1 Article Addressed to Is delivery different from Item 1 ❑ s C Doreen Sidor If YES,enter delivery address below ❑ No 645 Mill Creek Dr. Southold, NY 11971 3 Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II �I�II��III��II���IIII�III�II��III��I�I�II ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailT" ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9401 0005 5205 2486 26 ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise El Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑,Signature Confirmation"" _2 Article Number(Transfer from service label) Y.�Insured`Mail El Signature Confirmation �– . ..p Insured Mail Restricted Delivery :Restricted Delivery 7 015 0 64_0 1 0 0 0 2` -3'8 25 61'0 4 ° ` 1 (over$500) PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt • PLE-�E MI&SECTON ON DELIVERY ® • • A Signre ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3. at i �-- ❑Agent � ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you . Received by(Panted Name) C Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mall or on the front if space permits. ®7.1 1. Article Addressed to yro ehvery address different from dem 19 ❑Yes t, 1 �S,enter delivery address below ❑ No �Q 9255 'Main Road LLC PO Box 645LO Mattituck, NY 119 M .�I, 3- SQA e Type ❑Priority Mad Express@ 1 p �uI ignature ❑Registered Mad— III III�I I��I I'�����II II I II II� dulifiednature il@ Restricted Delivery ❑Delivery Mail Restricted, Cerfified Mads Q'Certrfied Mad Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 34 ❑Collect onDelivery I Merchandise ❑_Collector Delivory Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm 2. Article_Number_/Transfer_from_service.lahafl-------- ❑Signature Confirmation 7015. '0640 0002 3825 6012 tnctedDehvery Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 • . . . E ® 0 T4 I A Sign atur ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ❑Agent l ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. eceived y(Printed Name C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front if space permits. E� � � Ivery address different from dem 19 ❑Yes 1 Article Addressed to i ter delivery address below: ❑ No f 'Mariusz Jachimowicz �0�� I 9395 Rte. 25 1ti95� Mattituck, NY 11952 }C 1� rvice Type ❑Priority Mad Express® Adult Signatur e ❑Registered MailTIA ❑Adult Signa striated Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted II I I I I III I�I II I I I I�III �I I I I II 0 Certified M /tatted Delivery ❑Delivery Return Receipt for 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 a� X111 it'Res ry Merchandise Collette i Delivery ElSignature Confirmation TM o act on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2• prt,cle_Number_(Transfer from_service label) :_ ❑Insured Mad _; • Restricted Delivery 7015 06.40 '00b2 3825 6005 1atn6tedDelivery ' Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02'000-9053 u • • • DELIVER, " A Sig ture ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. F-1Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X El so that we Can return the card to you. Received b (Panted Name) C Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,1 f ^m / or on the front if space permits. PJ 1 Article Addressed to. D Is delivery address different from Item 19 ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below. ❑ No Mega Styl LLC •i�1314IS PO Box 56 f Mattituck, NY 11952 1 4 I erviCe IIII�I�I� �I I �I�II�I III II I��I�I I��II�II�I� dulbSignae nority Mad Express egistered Mad" tndery egistered Mad Restricted ted ult Signes �hfied Mail ! aD ehvery ❑ ified\Mail Restricted Deliv�9 Return Receipt for 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 58 ,��a Merchandise ❑C ITect�p Del very Restricted Dei ely' Signature Confirmation""' 2_Article Number;(Transfer from service label) : _ ❑Insu �0 El Signature Confirmation a Restncted Delivery 7g1'S ,0640 .0002, 3825 6036 F Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-0200 -9U53 ■ Complete items-1,2,and 3. 7X - Margaret tur ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent.- so that we can return the card to you. _ ❑Addressee I • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, _ � Name) C. Date of Delivery ' or on the front if space permits. �� �eo 1. ArticleAddressedto: . Is dehve ddress di �ti�from item 1? ❑Yes if YES,e delivery Ar s below: ❑No John P. Toner rN �� K. Toner � PO Box 362 Mattituck, NY 11952 �• ' II I IIIIII IIII III I III I II I II I III I II II II I VIII III ❑AdultyM�O�d Delivery 13❑Regis pe 1:1 Priority yed MaiMail lRestricted ❑Certified Mails Delivery 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 68 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article_Number(Transfer from service labeo 13Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM ❑Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 7015, 0640 0002 3825 619 7 ;il IPS Form'3811;July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000'9063 Domestic Return Receipt s o o • o ® . '11111 Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sign t re ® Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. �, ent Addressee M Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, �v y ht d e) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: -D—Is address different from rte 1? Yes Mary L. Berninger �,3�`L �deliveryaddress belo ❑No P 910 Sigsbee Road .110 Mattituck, NY 11952co Servide ❑Priority Mail(Express® I IIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII III VIII II IIII \ , (7 AdultSigna 0 �� ❑Registered MallTM ❑ ' •AduitSignature R d Delivery ❑Registered Malt Restricted 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 75 ❑`CPItlfied Mail®ss�� Delivery �� CertiflScted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 11 ry Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ----silvery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0002 3 8 2 5 6203 i.dcted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt l SEN ® B ® / / / / ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3. A Signature A ■ Prmt your name and address on the reverse X __- ❑Agent I so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee . ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallplece, B eroed by(Panted Name) C Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to _ D Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes IPPC-Inc. If YES,enter delivery address below- ❑ No 4248 Grand Ave. I Mattituck, NY 11952 I 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mad Expre980"' II III I ILII III II II I i I I II II I I sI I IIS IL II SII ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Ma ,', ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery very Registered Mail Restricted, ❑Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 96 ElCertified Mai(.Restncted Delivery' 11 Return Receipt for I ❑Collect on Dalivanj '--M6rcharfdise , _2.-Article-Number(I-ransfer_from_service_label)_._L _.___❑_Collect on Dehvery.Restricted Dehvery,.Q 5rgnature Qor firmationTM d Mad ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0002 3825 6074 d Mad Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery _ 6500) ® / .. / / I?ELIVERy ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. S nature ® Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee N Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B eceive b (Printed Name) C. Date of Delroery or on the front if space permits. 1 Article Addressed to D Is delivery address different from item 19 ❑Yes 9025 Main Road LLC If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No 10095 Main Road, Unit 4 Mattituck, NY 11952 IIIIIIIII ILII IIIAIIII IIII II IIIIIIIII I VIII III 3 Service Type ❑Priority Mad Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MaiITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mails Delivery 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 41 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2 Art icle_NumbeLlTransfer from servjce/abs/) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM 7 015 0640 0002 3825 6029 ) El Signature Confirmation _ �stncted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form'3811,`April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I i ENDER- •MPLETE SECT-ION • • ■ Complete Items 1,2,and 3. A. Si ature ■ Print your name�and address on the reverse X ®-VQ 1 so that we can return the card to you. t7Addressee 4 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ceivedhy(Pfinted Name) C. Da of Delivery ^� or on the front if space permits. 7 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1 ❑Yes I if YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No J A & C Moreno Revocable Trust 2301 Aspen Way ; Boynton Beach, FL 33436 i • i 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® II I I III I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I V III I II I ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail ❑ , Aduit Signature Restricted Delivery E3R Registered Mail Restricted; 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 99 13 Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Cert'rfied Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ZArticie Number_(Transfer_from sendce_lah,-11- ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation"m *red Mail ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0002. 3825 6234 _..psured Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery Tover$500) PS Form=3811;July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt i SENDER: • SECTIONI CoMpLETE�,THIS • UNDELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. FBe Sigtur� E3 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse 0 Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ved by(Printe ame) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. I '� Nea-j 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1?JWyes If YES,enter delivery address below: p o Vishnudat Seodat 7 Svitrie S. Seodat 1 5$� ds Ln. 1 G 1 J Cj(�' — Mattituc NY 11952 P1 62 1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® IIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIiI IIII II II III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MOWN El AdultSignature Restricted Delivery El Reg Ristered Mail Restricted' 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 51 13CertCertified Mail® Delivery El Certified Meil Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise rM [3 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2, Arricin NumhPr_?ransfer_from_seNlce/abeD ❑Signature Confirmation ?015 0640 0002 3825 61'80, RestrictedDellvery Restricted Delivery I ;i PS Form 3811;July,2015 PSNi7531)-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt SENDER: COMPLETE • • r ON zi�� �,p ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. l/— " ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee I eived by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, I i or on the front if space permits. 2�AIZ ACD c 'y��l j 1 Article Addressed to: D Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes I Margaret Noone If YES, very address below. ❑ No2223 I i 210 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, NY 11952 'sgrv�' II I IIIIII IIII III II II I I I I II II I I II I I I II I II II I IIIIC6nPriority Mad Expre ss® AdulYSignure Registered MaiIMc ted-0§6ati�reed Deivery Registered Mad RestndJ � , =•- � Delivery 9590 9401 0005 5205 2485 72 ie'd'Ai1�II.A2sfrictedDehver��r ❑Return Receipt for i f ❑ ri Dellvery!`: Merchandise I O Co_ p very R very_ ❑Signature Confirmation7m 2. Article_Num6er/Transfer from cervica/abed •_ -�� 5/ ;❑Signature Confirmation 7 0°15°'0'6 4.0 ❑0 0 2 '-3 8 2 5 '6 0 50 ehvery i Restricted Delivery I PSiForin 3811 JApril 2015 PSN;7536-02-000-9053 " Pvmestic Return Receipt I t t COMPL CTION COMPLETE SE[W ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. signature ent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X CJE3 Addressee so that we can return the card to you. = B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to" D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑Yes if YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No I Elizabeth A. Cassidy I 1560 Sigsbee Rd. I Mattituck, NY 11952 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® II�IIIIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIIII III IIIIII IIII I II III ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall R Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery ; 9590 9402 2783 6351 8130 90 Q Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for [3 Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfinnationTM' 2. Article_Number(ffansfer from service label) ,, ❑Signature Confirmation '7 015F'6' 4,q`i'0 0 0 2. 3825 '6{111 f Meted Delivery,t i i Restricted Delivery „ ' I PS Form`3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt I" COMPLETE SECTION, COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY it Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Sign tore ■ Print your name and address on the reverse gen I E3 Addressee I so that we can return the card to you. 111111 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. ce d by Tinted ame C. Date of Delivery I i I or on the front if space permits. z 1. Article Addressed to: D(/IsW4ivKad cess ff nt m item 1?_ Y If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No Ronald A McGrath Patricia McGrath i 15 Canterbury Rd. -Old Brookville, NY 11545 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® l III IIIIII I'll 111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIllIllIlIIIllIllllllIlilIII ❑Aduit Signature 13 Registered MailTm ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Reg 13 Certified Mail Restricted Certified Mail® Delivery { 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 37 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery El Return Receipt for j ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirrnationTm 2.-Article-Number Mansfecfrom.service Isbell—�—_ —I ❑Signature Confirmation , 70115 0646-6002 '3825 1616L : ;=1 Restricted Delivery = f Restricted Delivery PS Form`3811;Ju1y12015 PSN 7530-0210009()53 Domestic Return Receipt 1 COMPLETE •N COMPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 11:,2,and'3. i' ° , A.;Signature I. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X EI Agent ; so that we can return the card to you. Addressee + ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, . eceived by(Printed aCm2,ltl Y . . D De'very I' or on the front if space permits. �� y 1. Article Addressed to: D Is delivery addr s erent from item q7 Yes Abraham A. Garcia If YES,enter d iv address t,1lg�: I No .Sharon A. Rodriguez ca 885 Lincoln P1. North Bellmore, NY 11710 U5er' I i ! 3 Service Type El Priority Mail Express® 111111111 IIII 111111111111111111111111111111111111 ❑Adult Signature Registered MailT" El Adult Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Registered Mail Restricted! ❑Certified Med® Delivery i ❑Certified Mad Resrncted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9401 0005 5205 2486 02 ❑Collect onDelivery Merchandise __2._Article_Number_lTransfer_from_secviceJabellI❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm red Mad ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0002 3825 6081 red Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery $500) SECTIONLETE THIS COMPLETE T141S SECTIONON DELIVERY SENDER: COMP ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. Ay,Slgat _ A Agent 01 Print your name and address on the reverse X w. 13 Addressee ' so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, R.;A ceived by(Printed Name) C.Date of Delivery i or on the front if space permits. �� 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes IIf YES,enter delivery address below: [3 No Linda Mule ..l Felix Mule - ' II+ 118-18 Union Tpke. Apt. 12E Kew Garden, NY 11415 1 _ - 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mall Express® ll I IIIIII IIII lil 1111 i lI l it l Ill l li ll ll 1111 l l Ill ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail ❑ ❑ R Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mall® Delivery 9590 9402 2783 6351 8131 44 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for i ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2._Article Number n3nsfer from service label ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirrnationTM' (f ) ❑Signature Confirmation ❑Insured Mail 7 0,15 ;0,6 4;0 0 0,0 2 3 8 2 ,7 3, �oMail Restricted Del(very, Restricted Delivery :5' 61 .'tl r I r iii, 'PS FOrm138111,Jbly9015 PSN 75b0-02'000-9053 i f Dorriestic,Return Receipt i r I� 0� PAV) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of POSTING Paul Pawlowski (Name of Applicants) Regarding-Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as SCTM Parcel#1000- 122-7-9 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Charles -R. Cuddy residing at Marratooka .Ln. Mattituck , New York, being duty sworn, depose and say that: On the 26th day of 'July , 2017 , I personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, " securely upon my property, located ten(10) feet or closer from the street or-right-of- way(driveway entrance)-facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained.in place for seven(7)days prior to the .date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be August 3, 2017. (Signature) Sworn to before me this 31*-Day of'T„W , 2017 IWONA KODYM Notary Public, State of New York (Notary Public) No. OI K06088386 Ooty mmissi ed in n Expires IMarch n3, 200 near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passerby. -- - - - - - - -- -- -- - --- -m-- - - - - a--- CHARLES IZ.CUDDY I j U.S. POSTAGE ATTORNEY AT LAW RIVERHEAD, NY i 11901 I JUL 17, 17 445 GRIFFING AVENUE uxfrEasrarEs AMOUNT POSTdL SEAVlCEtt I P. O. Box 1547 1000 $6.59 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 7015 0640 0002 3825 6098 10017 R2304E107322-07 i Jamoo A. Eli .e� 333 E 43`d :'treet, p,,. 709 Ncw ` crk. N1017 try d fijD CNN I I t 1 II I iuvl'S4'b I I -- I Ilk NuTIi. E uHEARINUF The following application will be heard by the ,So' uthold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 , Main Road, Southold : NAME PAWLOWSKI , PAUL/SPORTS EAST #7097 MAP # 122E=7=9 VARIANCE INTERPRETATION REQUEST REQUEST REVERSAL OF BLDG . DEPT. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: THURS, AUG. 31 2017 1 :00 PM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . ZONING" BOARDmTr""N OF SOUTH ^ LD 765 =1809 4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALCE MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: http://soutlitown.northfork.net July 10, 2017 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 —Public Notices for Thursday, August 3, 2017 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of The Suffolk Times. 1) Before July 17th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement, or during the hearing, providing the returned letter to us as soon as possible; AND not later than July 24th: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later July 26th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Posting for receipt by our office before August 1, 2017. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. 1 BOARD MEMBERS _` OF SO(/T Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� y� 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora y�g Office Location: Eric Dantes C Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer ! O 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento COUNSouthold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov D � � V E ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUN 0 9 2017 Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 southoldTown Planning Board MEMO - TO: Planning Board FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson DATE: June 9, 2017 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA#7091 — Paul Pawlowski/Sports East The ZBA is reviewing the following application, and enclosed copies of, ZBA application, and latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 280 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. NAME TAX ZBA HEARING VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER #/ DATE DATE ZONE STAMPED PAUL 122- #7091 08/3/17 Art 111280- 5/12/17 PAWLOWS KI/S PORTS 7-9 13 EAST R80 Zone Your comments are appreciated by one week prior to above hearing date. Thank you. Encls. BOARD MEMBERS OF SO Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� g'p 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora lB Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer S �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento �yCOU0� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtownny.gov ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 September 25, 2017 Charles Cuddy Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead,NY 11901 Re: ZBA Application#7091, Paul Pawlowski, Sports East Dear Mr. Cuddy; Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's September 25, 2017 Findings, Deliberations and Determination, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above application for interpretation. If you have any questions, please call the office. ySinceely, r Kim E. Fuentes Zoning Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Dept. SEE SEC NO 114 G�F'Ti/ e MATCH — UNC ,S� ' d '� 1�� / •-7 gyp+ •? `�+; t 1 Q roc o QO. 'c. " c£'� b, d -� x 21A(c) 446 tea, 1 ✓' /�J-, ` ,^^ ^ �, __ --(l 13A(c)i, e 1 77 3 231 � 1 �']_ 16. t{7 `�] u 252 © p G1 Po- / t an(c) 3 Y• ri.'! a �v t r 9 --'�.- , Z y 34.1 :% 36A � \ ,• t pec 444�t ,. ,r 15,'1so�roe o"a9 rI 12 13 14 26 281 29 30 31 32 I P () •9,.`9 A J �, M1 �� I —. �.� • s^ r ,° m w � 'tra m I r e�-y/-s� I f � � d u Ea LEGION oo r� a (s+7 c 361 COUNTYOA.� 1 6 i I rG r, 46 J SUFfOI�. "•Y, .o -0 Q-a ,` q'� � ��// fr�, !" P m¢37ux 5 bF'7?A(c) ff / t� .� 1 ^� �¢76 0 7 1 C 47.2 _ p t9A/ . _/ ~ r�l 1 S ^1r a .vZl (q°L�- 711 �'19� � ° �S \6 e •P `'i � m 7.Sn v \t c 4 �,ta� �. �•.9 �� \t V� �9, FS c j! ��` ♦ 1 13 7 UA(c) TOWN OF �O SOUTHOLD CR ryh F �AA a� - F Nsaaa,*rPnrAwt +L� 66 c n Or o 4 once) 7 r 1 Vic\ �A 1n 69 D 51 BA • 1 � 1i9� O BV� » 9 �i FORMI-140 TG SEE SEC NO m QF'GOt, .� 11r.II6atB -------------'--LZ---- --.—.— ------ IJNE— w1tcR urrE Y3 SEr SEC N0-126 �;�,t.o; "� Semtuu.nLLe —'—SO1-- ,bane Mue un. --.—,t-- ,mteas WA,�t;oMflIMSE RLLrrORRnce til nlor(ce �yN �� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK t+= SEl'.fR w.ul 1/NNTENRNCC AllERATION ME ORr.� Real Property Tax Service Agency Yl,ICnT sn roaVmuN TiYPOpisprtEN+P- �. County Canter Rl Yathead,N Y 11901 6UrI0LK BOUNTY TA%NnP 15PR019g11E0 ovs^ ou,uiw --^-- e.i.e a...--rw--- ,wn l.•a wTnani vHilTEu nEAurSSiOV Of IMe e nEN.nnooGnr n,+[ccgv �n �`