The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-111.-10-18.1 OFFICE LOCATION: �O�*of $U(/TyOlO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) cos G Q Telephone: 631 765-1938 Southold, NY 11971 • �O P COUNTY, LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: John Bredemeyer, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: May 16, 2016 Re: Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coastal Consistency Review for PETER & SHEILA IZZO SCTM# 1000-111-10-18.1 & 18.2 PETER & SHEILA IZZO request a Pre-Submission Inspection to determine whether the proposed project is within Trustee Jurisdiction to take soil from the landward side of the vacant property, and place it and grade out a slope in two areas on the seaward side of the property in order to lessen the angle of existing slope. Located: 805 Meadow Beach Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-111-10-18.1 & 18.2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP Policy 6 and therefore INCONSISTENT with LWRP. The action proposes to fill a protective natural feature (bank/bluff) and eliminating existing vegetation. The purpose of the placement of fill is unclear. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Stephen Kiely, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold HD LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM MAY 12 2016 ---�J A. INSTRUCTIONS Southold Town Planning Board 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si ufig_ icant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each ausiver must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION PROJECT NAME �7i7/D The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate'response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: re2� � � � � � � ld 7 lad 51'd, C� F �Pa�e �� , �/wd/1oe �2 - %> f P Jj CU �� j1Location of action: �� Ci(�l�� Z��CSI L C4 Site acreage: �J • I Ct e k S Present land use: P5 d2 Present zoning classification: �-e , Cz ✓l �-/ 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: 1 OPI 2 f (b) Mailing address: l VO4 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (o _2�, l (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No,[� If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No 10 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary , Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No M Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of.Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ Yes No y— Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No E� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluatiop criteria. -❑-Yes- ❑ No Ft4Not-Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public Iands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye❑ No C�Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No L(�.l Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62-through-65-for evaluation-criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No[P Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No [N Not Applicable PREPARED BY 'UL/C TITLE_jLnV a 4,n '1--/L- DATE / 0/6, \ v ho 167 t3591 t}6}� ti P53} (712; 5 t� l.d�lc)i'/ r 2H1 12 �� s� 1.3A 253 � '�• Nei// 1}60 o i366' ze, 0331 e3 > 1,y51+ � o t}651 2}S � 1311) VL 136 Al 760 2 26S q_ N 61 �q yG®�"C��,7\' 1314) 9 / O 8 (31 f 115 soz / VI )IYlll.� HORSE192 " 26° (C3� 10G Al°1 �A o \'•�\ 275- Coke �11,4" \pD 14 e��a 1 15p5 b 171x) 11 (715) 2 a$ \ a 10 ° N 405-----p 1AA(c) 0 11 �°° 1A111 o 1B1/ \ !jN 95° 'ry NO° 1pH ,tOn 7 a 3.0A(C) / 4q f2 rP 1pG b'S ------------ °d 57 }x4 145 �°r 4121 1 1a5 (320) \1°� .7 ..6 1321) las, 162 °o� Gl LL "o' 1 a^(31) wa a(EADon as 1 1• �` 1>Oy 176; 027)CIO 11A3 7.1 / II 1.2°� ' 1.3A(c) eqC 1e131 CGA(c) }1 !40 0 `� --- ------ 9 0221 Ln 15, O1131 — NP��v o (35) 2 ,aO, .r (320) l �N6/ i aN Zxl 140 19 420 027) THE t] 1326A) r - NATURE // (34) 3 y , q 270 a, titih rY,$ / CONSERVANCY �� 1251 '- 0231ti^ 11•P / \ 151 °j ua t.+ �,-- 17 ---- 1726) (szsl / 2.3A(C)— 0 nz4) �. w� 20 21 37a •�'� // / 1 4c�'{'";3�i e�'�'I tAD _ 310 .' �d trj ti 1x1°1 411 1 � ♦`\ //,, // 121 / � • ' � 1s} 1731) ti^h 190 lB0 H 9 / awl (321 37 va r, `''s 4 Its o ° �♦ 102r 1'19' 39: 012) ?° J6,1 0 `Q � _ ;::uh 15 5 5 1.4A(C) 51 75 226 3�0.o s' 4`' LOA(c) �5 9 J s o 5 4 `q1 °y ii Dpi /�� C t1 )7 ♦�• _ _ �Q 197 S°a ��r�lJ 70 00p i9 ml' BP- Ar ;� 1,91AY 1 1 2016X 19.7324R5 X2649 X19 A c42 Lo CB MAG 60D fET X7J8 CP 105 C"I Iy 1X613 CB 14AG SIT '4/ PROPOSED TOP OF NORTH-WEST FILL SLOPE /F n9s PETER M. IZZO & SHEILA IZZO TOP AT EXISTING SLOPE (S.C.T.M.#1000-111.0-10, LOT#18.1) 241t9x la 22 VEVAyIPARKINC i A ST13NE DRILIMITS OF FILL1786xZ34 X, P X5640MA TE PAD X530 X576 C. UK cONCREx 50.87TYR_"4 X 4.63 '16 ix ,-11' LINES' ',,P, P.) CP 103//_x488� 1 *ACB MAC 60i,SET Z24 1.99 .02 x 55.76 53.199" 1X 52,18X5ZI2 X 55,7-'..... X 52.39 X 57.04x 4Z86 x 17.83 -0.9%5.2 h 1 00 4 0 1,08 4295 LIMITS OF CU XV 1�/ \17PROPOSED TOP X-4d X 9,OF SOqTH X58.56 Xffq._%1-WEST�/X 3.59 *x471 FILL SLOPEX4.56 9.78 Ln 0 Lr) iX 4.31 .864 4. X 3.52 , 4 ' X 4Z, 9, ' X 41 \1//X:;.4 2 x 19 x5" 9J.9115011 ' .101 1 "iX 3.P3 x a27 X 5.5 ; I i 76 x6n W6 IX- ' V.90 89 "'TOP ATNZXISTING1,SLOPE \4/ \J/ "I , I , , 1 X 61.V1X396 X 9.15;`lV' I 64 5�' X 63.66 jpt X 114.13 \J/104 X 63.56tpx3M X 4.78 07, forCBMAG 60DSET X64.43X5 • q)k 46,09 "o r9,LD", \1/ \1/ X \4/ X 6allX34.4 1/ 3.80 73 .0101CB MAC 600 SETX63xX5.04I X 46.17 50.08X2152N/F• f5.70 ERM. IZOIx X1,03 .C.T.M.#1000-111.0-1 , LOT#18.2) X 45167I X 57.90 X 61J6 54OR XX" 1 '.8748,% X'119180420X61.0 607XN/F XE.75C_ ANN HARRISON & PATRICIA HARRISON x 610 X1,78 (S.C.T.M.#1000-111.0-10, LOT#17)X2,4X 3.97 X 5.15 0 X 2.25 LL LL 0SITE LEGEND: PROPOSED EAST SIDE TIN VOLUME 0 PROPOSED NORTH-WEST SIDE TIN VOLUME0Base Surface "Existing1; Base Surface "Existing" PROPERTY LINEComparison Surface "Prop East�0_ Comparison Surface "Prop North-West" PROPOSED CONTOUR Cut Volume 1 ,544.45 Cu. Yd. Fill Volume = 383.98 Cu. Yd. EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED SOUTH-WEST SIDE TIN VOLUME PROPOSED SEEDING & TOPSOIL o Base Surface "Existing" NOTES: Comparison Surface "Prop South-West" n Fill Volume 1 ,077.44 Cu. Yd. 1 . EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY FROM FIELD SURVEY OF OCT. 22, 2015 BY L.K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 3/11 /16 LMY IADDE ID ANNOTATION CFD TOTAL FILL VOLUME 1 ,461 .42 Cu. Yd. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 2. HORIZONTAL DATUM & COORDINATES ARE IN N.Y.S. PLANE - EAST LONGISLAND ZONE NAD83 (CORS 96) MEASURED IN FEET. REVISIONS 3. VERTICAL ELEVATIONS & DATUM ARE TO BE MEASURED IN FEET 805 MEADOW BEACH M (NAVD88). NASSAU POINT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD E0 IZZO PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY EARTHWORK PLAN Ln ' � Q0- 0 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 000Warning: THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANYCONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 0 40 80 PERSON FROM ALTERING ANYTHING ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE Sheet No. ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS IT'S UNDER THE DIREC71ON OF ADesigned By: CFD scale: AS NOTEDFeet LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, WHERE SUCH ALTERATIONS ARE MADE, ME D R ® AD -17 THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MUST SIGN, SEAL, DATE AND DESCRIBE THE Drawn By: LMY Date: OCT. 2015 SCALE : 1 " = 20 ' FULL EXTENT OF THE ALTERATION ON THE DRAWING AND/OR IN THE SPECIFICATION (NYS ED. LAW SECTION 7209-2). Approved By: RGD File No. 15117.000 40 EXISTING GRAD STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL NOTES: PROOSED GRAD,„ , I 30 I SEE SHEET#3 FOR PROPOSED SURFACE TREATMENT, DRAINAGE & _ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL DETAILS. 20 - - -� -- - SEE SHEET#3 FOR CROSS SECTION A-A. 10 O FIL ARE .#1 E DATUM ELEV -10.000 N CO N O U) 00 0 O 00 CV 0) 00 00 O O N N 1 / � 0+20 0+40 0+60 \ 1 - CROSS SECTION A A MEAD Diul E E A C H R ® A D SCALE. 1 " =20' FILL AREA# 1 � 2 X3,3"'•.•,. ,.,,�h "'^'-'. � r # //'�'` ....^"„ r' `" ..,,,,„,,..-,... '«"'^+. ..,„� •...,.. '»» £ t x26.,9 W x6: SEE SHEET#3 FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAILS 6"1 02 CB AG 60D SET CP 105 PETER M. IZZO/& SHEILA IZZO i x, ,6 x 22. '. t # 24.86 8 } ,72 TOP AT EXISTING SLOPE (S.C.T.M.#1000-111.0-10, LOT#18.1) x 11.17 19 aT 'x 12 d rS 22 } ` TONE DRIVEWAY/PARKING x 7.34 '^•,,.,,,,,,,� \ xsgl..90 -»,,..,...,__ t t 8 � z 17.86 l , 19.3 \ 1 l }{ ; F � � � x 75 X 330 x 376 •` '^-„..--. `""-.,,.. „.. ., "^'^e,. .,e 1 `k W� 1 b 1 •} {` `x 56.40 '," -- 1 EXISTING RESIDENCE Sac* 54' A , tb � PAD x 050.87 % CONCRETE x, 3 �. .,..x .96` `{ ; �, .,. �. x\ ` f ,f LINES (TY P.) CP 103 .�" x 4,ea .6 I \ .-....,. , .t 4 ' # { l I J f t CB MAG 601;SET 399M +, } J € ff f t S t x 55.76 ,✓ v� `1' � � € � S i x 5319 � '+ 21.02 W j EEE jpjjtt � #gg jp I l' � `1' `I,, `'' `I .• ""° �,y `a 1 , s ,1 ��# W t t f 1 ! L,,, �"".,y 4 t4} 1{ {X 5818 t t !!! € W W"37.01 W W fX 57,98 ..,..,'"'.,.•" +� 1 `a `} 1, t # s t ) # ."�- # -- f_ d f , \ 11 1 ' €S .6B 57,12 ,✓ S { x 1 ! j ! f J( t 1 j ti., �' a x47s6 x 5238 i # µ 57.0, x,83 x 57,45 O 1 41J ( 0.9% 0' r�'� ? 1 2208 \ jf I LIMITS OF CUT > �`'`'\. 9 6 0 d # d p `s" 7 W z 2280 �[/ `'.. , `•,,,, ,, \,; ...,.,„,,..., t 7 >�42.91 € E } x 52.,2 52.91 µx 58.56 x.58.v0 j f f o 24.06 d x3.59 \ O x 4.71 x,.56 7 r ✓" w,.,, ,_ -, .., �'1 msµ.,.. r :� dd f f y �ti .`°. 5� f E'' `i' V `j/ Q_ r'r ..x .6.7 ..✓"",,,„- ""^wx4.31 x352 `•+.., ® � t O �.. `� ' ' � { 't � � � f .r� � F,✓ 1/ ,r'z 59J2 ~W W ,fY'B25 „ry �. ,.-.,^^, """"""^-.,,, `'�. x g# 'Er `I, gf `I' # d '%V�{3� 16 `I\I a I' `• `I'* �, `I € f `I,� \,„ "'-^.„` `',„�"w a ,e,„ 7 3 > W W V ° W £ W W``'i rW W ` .,., ' J s t X3849 0 � x 7 ,a' '.,� `i�^ x 354 j I # .J O # } n T'O 4 �, x d 69 j f x 5 9 x 6260 L2'wff _e � `I' `I' `I' ,I' jj((((( { �jj/p l � lf 1X5,910 xa42` # � f 1 W ,r✓" ,M,.....,.- } I X 3' 1 I # F t i { 1 S f 1X 59.10 _ .m..... , j s "r 876 x 325 x 327 . , } I ( f # f j x ✓"�" 889,•-vµ'_' X. s O 4 i�'�- O 4 W / / x 6 1 y6� w x4,43 .r^" \'*� ' 1 , I I _ E TOP AT�XISTING�SLOPE \1/ � ,/'-"X 3B6 ✓ x 268 ` X 3.53 { s I 1 s .I r d f _ 64 5". 6 LIJ 5 W # EP 104 Z t #/ x ,.10 x 64.23 W W jF } I #j 1 j tB MAG 60D ET 4+00., x64.43 46.09 U x3.70 x5 1 } '075 ' II # t j >: f 50,99 ( z6.27 # ( } Jjj E `'' � € `I, f x59.8 I, �7 'LL_ € t I E JJ I s.i 7 �rxx W ip W `I' p W bb \� 3.IIW �, 4+/O J tt WE r 5 �x6 `✓ , tt Lj_ I E I , 1 # s 1 t 1 x 6266 O r"'~r, On CD s` � ° CB MAG 60b SET 1 J' I � `I�, `I'\ `+' `', `', x 3.8 £ s # ;.j a € x 56 \ W 4 ` x 638 r } x 46.77` tx 50.08} O s x .2 3: sf; 1 } a x39.09 ^^ _ 0 x 232 x 3.0 # Ct: N/Fx , ''x 5805 , fj 1 . jg t t '� 63 C T 000-111 0-1 LO s ` W .... n a X25-03-\ � PETER M IZZO , - JJ l S. . .M. 1 0, T 1 .2 1 s { # �d � # � S x 49,'x67 .b 57,90ik, Ii# t I ,ffx 225 }j fj E t : (- d f pN x25.39 s. '^„. `^,.,„ 5,.02 .87 W W W W I c- f 201 1� , s # E € 9 � # { �- �_ z 48.% ,,, •,.„ , t , d - - 420 x 6116 C,4 66 I # t # t :3 I �� `✓ 0.60 ... E # N/F x273 x370 FILL AREA#2 ANN HARRISON & PATRICIA HARRISON Q f x1,78 �{ Ip # , (S.C.T.M.#1000-1 11.0-10, LOT#17) BORROW AREA 60.05 - x2' x3871 x3r5 12 WIDE TEMPORARY 4 ACCESS ROAD � SITE LEGEND: SITE PLAN DATA: NOTES: 0 -- PROPERTY LINE co PROPERTY OWNER: PETER M. IZZO & SHEILA IZZO 1 . EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY FROM FIELD SURVEY OF OCT. 22, 2015 BY L.K. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY u 10 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPERTY ADDRESS: 805 MEADOW BEACH ROAD McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP No.: REVISIONS EXISTING CONTOUR DISTRICT#1000,MAP#1 1 1 .0,BLOCK#10,LOT#18.2&#18.1 2. HORIZONTAL DATUM & COORDINATES ARE IN N.Y.S. PLANE - EAST LONG � PROPOSED SEEDING & TOPSOIL TOTAL SITE AREA/ACREAGE: ISLAND ZONE NAD83 (CORS 96) MEASURED IN FEET. 805 MEADOW BEACH C° # 420 SQ. FT. (1 .32 ACRES) NASSAU POINT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOT 18.1 = 57, E LOT 18.2 = 39,930 SQ. FT. 0.92 ACRES) 3. VERTICAL ELEVATIONS & DATUM ARE TO BE MEASURED IN FEET PROPOSED SILT FENCE TOTAL AREA WITHIN CLEARING LIMITS: 21 ,675 SQ. FT. (NAVD88). IZZO PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY rq PROPOSED BALE DIKE S• STORMWATER MANAGE ENT o STORMWATER DRAINAGE CALCULATION Ln PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS = 0.0 SQ. FT. CONTROL PLAN PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (GRASS) = 36,560.0 SQ. FT. (Q=ACI) CD o CW= (36,560 X 0.2) = 7,312 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. O o 0 40 80 7,312 x 2"/12"(RAINFALL)- 1 ,218.7 C U. FT. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Warning: THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANY I� PERSON FROM ALTERING ANYTHING ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS IT'S UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A Feet LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, WHERE SUCH ALTERATIONS ARE MADE, Ln » _ THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MUST SIGN, SEAL, DATE AND DESCRIBE THE Drawn By: LMY Date: MARCH 11, 2016 C) SCALE : - 2 O FULL EXTENT OF THE ALTERATION ON THE DRAWING AND/OR IN THE SPECIFICATION (NYS ED. LAW SECTION 7209-2). Approved By: RGD File No. 15117.000 80 i I BOR OW A EA � � ._.�.__._____..• I 70 PROPOSED G RA D.E _ 60 50 40 ROPO ED L ;ACHIN BASIN#3 30 0ROPOSED GRADE I 20 10 DATUM ELEVr "RE2 Lt -10.000 1`� N (0 �{ c0 CO 00 0 ( (0 N L0 O N GD N r 00 Cn O _ O L0 O _ C) r — ) 0) 00 (0 0) N N j D N N pN0N O N O O O O CA � 00 c0 07 M 0000 O N It r7 (DO 000 1'7 L0 Ln ((j O V) N N N r') prP7 M r) 14- � L0 Lo (0 O (0 cd0 (`0t cD d c0 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 CROSS SECTION B - B SCALE: 1 " =20' PAVEMENT.ZSURFACE SCHEDULE SYMBOL SECTION/DESCRIPTION REMARKS \11/ – HYDROSEED AS SPECIFIED 4"(MIN.) DEPTH OF TOPSOIL GRASSED AREAS (ALL DISTURBED —III-- I-III—) I I—III COMPACTED SUBGRADE SURFACES) O O 6" DEPTH AGGREGATE AS NOTED SEE TEMPORARY STABILIZED — CONSTRUCTION IIIIII—IIIIIII I— COMPACTED SUBGRADE ENTRANCE DETAILS 0 I n _ SILT FENCE DETAILS FENCE 5.1 TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ° FLow ENTRANCE DETAILS 7 `�,— WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 14-1/2 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" MESH SPEAKING) 50 MIN. 4_1 ' EXISTRIG 0 '''� MAX. CENTER To CENTER - 10,-0• " MIN. 3' PAVEMENT LLJ \'`'. `� r LL_ POSTS,4" VERTICAL FACE 1 POSTS, DRIIVVENMIN. n 4^ 16" INTO GROUND UI BEDDING DETAIL T FILTER CLOTH MOUNTABLE BERM NOT TO SCALE PROFILE (OPTIONAL) }' HEIGHT OF FILTER FABRIC 16" EXISTING NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AREA NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET iGROUND OF STRAW BALE DIKE FOR SLOPES LESS THAN 25% MINIMUM W W W W O 8 O ANGLE FIRST STAKE �� k p " MINIMUM 50' MIN. 11 TOWARD PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE �� FLOW _�✓ l� �^ \� F% PERSPECTIVE VIEW _ 0 Ln NOT TO SCALE EXISTING U)� WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 20,,,,MIN. PAVEMENT �----- 14-1/2 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" BOUND BALES PLACED MESH SPACING) WITH FILTER ON CONTOUR CLOTH OVER r PLAN VIEW --� " COMPACTED 20 MIN. 10 MIN.—I z O 2 REBAR, STEEL PICKETS OR 2x2 SOIL NOT TO SCALE 4- STAKES DRIVEN 1 1' T 2' IN GROUND. UNDISTURBED � DRIVE STAKES FLUSH WITH BALES. GROUND FLOW CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS -: 616" MIN. 1. AGGREGATE SIZE - USE 2 INCH STONE OR RECYCLED CONCRETE AGGREGATE. D EMBED FILTER CLOTH —L SILT FENCE SECTION 2. LENGTH: AS REQUIRED, BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET (EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30 DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY z CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED BALE DIKE MINIMUM G6" INTO ROUND 4" NOT TO SCALE FOOT MINIMUM WOULD APPLY). 3. THICKNESS: NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES. REVISIONS 1. BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR AND IN A ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED SILT FENCE U ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. 4. WIDTH: 12 FOOT MINIMUM BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH OF POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS 805 MEAD 0 W BEACH 2. EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF (4) INCHES, AND PLACED SO THE BINDINGS ARE 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POST: STEEL EITHER 'T' OR 'U' OCCURS. 24 FOOT MINIMUM IF THERE IS ONLY ONE ACCESS TO THE SITE. Q) HORIZONTAL POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES. TYPE OR 2" HARDWOOD 5. FILTER CLOTH: TO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE. NASSAU POINT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD m 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE 3. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES OR REBAR DRIVEN THROUGH THE FENCE: WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 GAGE, n BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL BE DRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE AT AN ANGLE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID 6" MAX. MESH OPENING 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE E O TO FORCE THE BALES TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH THE BALE. SECTION. PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE I Z Z 0 PROPERTY TOP 0 G R A P H I C A L SURVEY n FILTER CLOTH: FILTER X, MIRAFI PERMITTED. O' 4. INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER 100X, STABILINKA (tel 0 THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. T140N OR APPROVED 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OF 5. BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS SO AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE EQUAL. SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR STREETS. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH S T 0 R M W A T E R MANAGE E N T STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. 4. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, OR WASHED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE O MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT PREFABRICATED UNIT: SEOFAB. REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. L(7 FENCE. OR APPROVED CONTROL DETAILS � 0 STRAW BALE DIKE DETAILS OR APPROVED 8. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE, � N.T.S. EQUAL. P.C.O 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, 1 N CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Warning: THE EDUCATION LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROHIBITS ANY Sheet No. PERSON FROM ALTERING ANYTHING ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR THE Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS IT'S UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, WHERE SUCH ALTERATIONS ARE MADE, Ln THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER MUST SIGN, SEAL, DATE AND DESCRIBE THE Drawn By: LMY Date: MARCH 11 , 2016 Z FULL EXTENT OF THE ALTERATION ON THE DRAWING AND/OR IN THE J SPECIFICATION (NYS ED. LAW SECTION 7209-2). Approved By: RGD File No. 151 17.000