Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-5-12.6 OFFICE LOCATION: �o��of SU(/1�,01® 1 MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) cn G Q hone: 631 765-1938le Southold, NY 11971 � • �O Telephone: LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date March 8, 2016 Re: Coastal;,Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref. BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY, INC. (JASON SCHMIDT) -#6934 SCTM# 1000-53-5-12.6 BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY, INC. (JASON SCHMIDT) -#6934 - Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123 and the Building Inspector's February 3, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1) a,nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, 'structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, located at: #8 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25) aka Sage Blvd. (adj. to Shelter'Island Sound) Greenport, NY. SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, the proposed action is recommended as CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Stephen Kiely, Assistant Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS ®F soSouthold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� j�Q 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantesit Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G @ Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �® ® �® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider lyc®um Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765--9064 February 16, 2016 Mark Terry, Principal Planner FEB 1 16 2016 LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office South6idTown Town of Southold Planning Boar Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref.No. # 6934 Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Schmidt Cott. # 8) Dear Mark: We have received an application for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter-280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairpers By: ��s\ a` - ,'SR^n�9•� - � s nh \\RD n ' h t 1, ���-'` ---- ----- — 25A To rt(nl 4i - Y hs, SOUi11IXD -P`' . ,q t3 3 la 19 J �� 151 3.3A ila ��t•�-- 3 / �,y TOWN OF 2 -/��'..SOLmi LD [ • Q¢ 111A(c) / /( ^m J,s' •`'�� TOWN OF SOOLD O O. —• ""` �`•'• •- • I YL @'; '�, lMD PRETERvn110N �Lf�' �_ _�• IJM OD N' /r�(J l 2 A_l a ,,• 7 9-:'� .--� 141 59A(c) �3 TOWN OF sOuTHoLD Yi 18W�+ �V•d,_ sr -.' a' 'a PIPES CREEK Z 26 \ Q 12A(C) A 9q b lj o - a' a , 2 •F :e ,�4"w ¢� Is 6 ry9GQI, 3 4y 5-tA(c) r"!a, .36�:g, n` �'- d`2{. S -cw, ••e,6 �!-�1�•,/��� ,�a' n 'b 44A4 @ $ i�11 'd' $3t@.a 1a,r u' 'y��2? e'sQ 9" s ^a �. y �'-� I ,• � � � J��•1 ^(-� �1 5-7A T R01,'NOF 50(/11i01D aM 3 •' '0 @ -� s A y r N CDNSERVA77ONFiiSFXFJa y,rg `°;,i ra $7e 3 �Sr7j� ; c b$ �' , s �>i>2 -•r1. $ 3 r^— «7 C� / ) /�{� ^� - ^• ,P 7p 72 0 ry> M o y cg•26 ,y' a 13 T-s v OL ��/Q• (—( '�-'` �c� ��— s e >r ss G JSP ,y�@ o b s ` 74 is cry �r{1�. ,�Vn/j�/,,/•V^\ � aro / a�'aY Qv,4`�%4 - %@>�7qj,7 ° a.a4°•o� ;<����; �n"°�2@,�`'"'; Qv�'+,`'.®4✓2@ ¢4fi'79�Fa. •",{,4p'P7'o�r' " �n'c''`sm eu F 3 6 J lkl. 40 �poCy• �Q ��1�6•S�C. ��J•��''�J[C'—`,-.-J. c.1}� ^S '53— 126c 5 3— Ll qLt- q_03 . l 96OA(c) O �'� ? LQ p4 `P^ ` 5-1— 5 44.4. 11 � — o-� — q / 9�r°t° °?>� �% 4O,>7 ?Z`,�r 40,`� +• r" S 3 4— ` 4, �D S� — I� 39. 3 467 469 46.71 7. �n _s FOR PCL NO. / °p •1�,+ 8 .�� .-.�- SEESEG NO. ,d 46.6 v:Dez fe ' ar'�P •m 15E'p e t��� -.--•\ D57.0"36.a = 7'2A f'' /Oo,53,,, c•�71'.3 q�a�s 6 Haz 1� rlr t 3 vNgy OR w _ > - + -- -szo ----c�=------- ----_------ y —� m — % �Z�• 9p4•e Gcoc+ q �4,L'L,�a (b - - 4 zr 40 ,y P/�• 6 :n.n09 a _ F lJ�\l` \ •i` _ - p+ 3 �O'.6 02-I•T .+•♦5.V' _ 'r., 2o-b ra, = 54 6 „`t" w1 (50• c i3 a w v 1 FOR PCL NO 1FOR NO 22A[c) c1 1• - SEE SEC NO - ' _ rn,•a�a,,2p� $ •.R�sra e 9 SEE SEC NO 9 a "2.1 xe -MOa6 a «9 :6'7 -e54 r -. '• ••`tP w, 053-05-012 6 o5 ..,`� re r_ -W a ay -a ,s r a; 32 / - '3A/ �'"•+nom' -ter e _ f / ' 38. s� m n` ,es e�s yo \ � n, 1 oe -Lb!:s c e ••394 '' > O � w ~io 29 7DK \SP �- - w, • - R -t i s,• N' P !94*a: \ �' 424' `(9 L 71 s23 ata =25 is 27 , A 1 a#,- •s " e y _ ;s, 'V a ., 'gLBa --t> 16 c' '� '"` Yi *' p\ amaun¢.. a°"�` _.`� I �+, - $ ,v q 2t .r° �• '' N�- e „34v O az a 43C�RE,e DR." ,� tsz_ 4�,Y ,� t5 ems.-• �`,-.y"v.b� .i ��,p�( i .o a 'O 3S e* f� '�Cye 42 5t- Z24 (50� OR`4 �f 'paa o, f/i h 3DA(c) u/• x t `\ Q�94q a< m O22 a y� I 425 37.1 12, • wr _ ��` "g 'e,. I - 2D1A(c) f ;� %13 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: November 9, 2015 RENEWED: February 3, 2016 TO: Frank Uellendahl(Schmidt/Breezy Shores) PO Box 316 Greenport, NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated November 4, 2015 For permit to make additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at Location of property: 65490 Route 25, Greenport,NY (Breezy Shores Cottage#S) County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 53 Block 5 Lot 12.6 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed additions and alterations are not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-123 A., which states; "A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming;use shall not be enlarged, or structurally altered or exce t as forth below, unless the use of such buildingis changed to n use." Author J ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviatio to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Buildin epartment. CC: file, Z.B.A. Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House Nol 0 Street U_G: 267Hamlet 4 �E�L) vz_ SCTM 1000 Section,� Block -'-5 Lot(s) 1,2,& Lot Size,92,16 eXI-?-k�Zone I (WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED / ` BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED- Owner(s): Ae--e k) 6- W -u oZ A)o L4 ) [ Gs 5TA u C� Mailing Address: � � �L^� 6i~ 4SLo kyet- 1 k)y Telephone: ( Fax: Email: /a!5a !'., 6dyltQ1G��'l�,L�1l ,GC1L` V NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: eWikl LCGLLC—_k)QA1-k for Owner( )Other: Address: 1`zz 6_e5_1 FkL k,-6 Abe _�« , 4-eL--G10K Telephone: `� � Fax: Email: p , GiC� Lc [�i�1✓lG� ll_k�, Plea check to specify who you wish lorrespondence to be mailed to,from the above names: (Applicant/Owner(s), (Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE)3UILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED // CG and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED if !` FOR: ( Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XX U( Section: 2-60 f, 3 A Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (eA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal ( ) has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner (3CC_G2h1 #: 25 -V2. I ClCj ZBA File# OTA 100 t 5 2-5 2-01 G plLLj. j t)k) 66-.2 2 203 V-rp o© ��'7 2013 �' L 51 LLOO&-k .2013 p,.0-CCe 1-4 l D ae 14- r.7-t? :71;%t4 Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance,because: 5 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self created? Yes,or { } No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? No { }Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, an at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and f e of the community. [ ii SitV of Applicant or Authorized Agent //,, (Ag must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sw to befor me this v✓ day of 20 Notary Pu i TRACEY L. DWYER !VOTARY!PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO.01 OW6306900 QUALIFIED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 30,201 Frank Wolfgang Uellendahl Architect 123 Central Ave POB 316 Greenport, NY 11944 t: 631.477.8624 e: frank@frankuellendahl.com November 30, 2015 Owners: Jason Schmidt and Cory Jacobs Nicholas Blechman and Luise Stauss Cottage #8, Breezy Shores Community Inc. 65490 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 S CTM: 1000-53-05-12.6 Project: Proposed structural alterations to an existing seasonal cottage RE: APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PART A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: It has been determined by the Town of Southold that all 28 seasonal cottages at Breezy Shores Community, Inc. constitute non-conforming buildings containing a non-conforming residential use. Therefore the Building Department has determined that relief is required to undertake the proposed renovations and alterations because the structure will not be changed to a conforming use. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and it's far removed from neighboring properties so that no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposed structural improvements. The addition will increase the size of the existing structure minimally by less than 3%. The adjacent waterfront cottages have similar pre-existing, non-conforming bulklhead setbacks. (2) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: Due to the pre-existing, non-conforming residential use of the cottage that cannot be enlarged and structurally changed, it is not possible to make the proposed modest improvements to the cottage without the requested relief from the code. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The footprint expansion of only 21 SF is located landward of the existing cottage at a distance of +/- 91 feet from the bulkhead. In prior decisions related to other Breezy Shores applications involving proposed footprint enlargements of less than 3% the Board has deemed such increases to be de minimus in nature. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Due to the isolated location of the property a variance relief in this community will not produce a negative impact on the physical or environmental conditions. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? (X) Yes, or ( ) No. Why? Yes, because the applicant bought the cottage after the Zoning Code was in effect and knew about the limitations regarding alterations to the structure, however, the need for a variance is not self-created because a seasonal dwelling requires periodically some gree of reconstruction or alteration to continue the safe use of the structure. l , APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: -e—c w to ( DATE PREPARED: 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: 1 &)j't jLj®Q -�-4 r Ulm A� II.New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: _ �a � Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 14"-4-" A f=ree Ll PT- Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground)measured from natural existing grade to first floor: a III.Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Ol Jam-- f5TV LV CD !>r-- I Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: -7676 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: 2-1 15 Square footage of your lot: Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: V.Purpose of New Construction: VI.Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %,heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): F?-/A`9 Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject prem is s listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes No B. Are ere any proposals to change or alter land contours? No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Yew 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction 10 !!D Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: a A !r l5 Lwdc and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? V® E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? X1 D Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? /uo If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? 00 If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel �E.�i�oaCiR� t and the proposed use (ex existing single family,proposed same with age,pool or other) Author e signature and Dfite BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 S�Ul/y�i 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes `e7 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider ��� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED 73Ci-- 'S l ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS A Z 5 01 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 0 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 Souold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERA'T'IONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF APRIL 17,2014 ZBA FILE:6704 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community Inc. Cottage 47(Steven Flotteron)CTM 1000-53-5-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION:65490 Main Road,(aka Sage Blvd.)(adj.to Shelter Island Sound),Southold,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 15, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards: The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated Nov. 26, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages previously housed employees of the Sage family brick factory,and after the brickyard closed, they were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000 a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,was established,and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.7 and is owned by Steven Flotteron.The cottage,with proposed improvements, is shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated Dec. 30, 2010, and the site plan drawings by Robert I.Brown Architect,P.C.,dated March 24,2014, BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116(B)and the Building Inspector's October 31,2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use,2)less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. Page 2 of 3-April 17,2014 ZBA46704-Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc. SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations to an existing nonconforming seasonal cottage when such changes to a nonconforming structure containing a nonconforming use are not allowed by Code,and a second variance for a 72 feet setback from the bulkhead,where 75 feet is required. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the Dec. 5, 2013 hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant on March 26,2014 submitted a revised plan that reduced the size of the proposed non-conforming additions and alteration, bringing the plan into more conformity with the codes. Several letters of support were received. The Board of the Breezy Shores Community is in support of the proposal. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 5,2013,on February 6,2014, and on April 3,2014,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(M)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands,and it is sufficiently removed from other adjacent neighborhood properties so that no adjacent property owners will be adversely impacted by the proposed structural improvements to seasonally occupied Cottage V. The additions will be limited to a 2.8%increase in the size of the existing structure. All 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's,when they were constructed for workers in the Sage brick factory.In the I940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed and then stopped, the cottages were rented to seasonal guests.The adjacent waterfront cottages have similar,pre-existing,non- conforming bulkhead setbacks. 2. Town Law&267-bQ)(b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use. The cottage also has a pre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 72 feet. As a consequence of the non-conforming features any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for the alterations and additions is mathematically substantial;representing 100%relief from the code because Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non- conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of 20.6 square feet to the existing structure represents a 2.8% increase in the size of the pre-existing cottage footprint.This Board,in prior decisions related to other Breezy Shores applications involving proposed increases of structure sizes of less than 3%, has deemed such increases,particularly when necessary to make interior bathroom or bedroom space more Code conforming,to be de minimus in nature.This applicant's proposed increase in structure size is necessary in order to bring the existing bedrooms up to code required legal size. The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B)for a 72 feet bulkhead setback where 75 feet is required by Code is not mathematically substantial,representing approximately 4%relief from the code. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5).The difficulty has been self-created since the applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.However,to the extent that a seasonal structure such as this one periodically requires some degree of reconstruction and/or alterations to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created. Page 3 of 3-April 17,2014 zBA#6704-Breeay Shores Comm.,Inc. SCCM#1000-53-5-12.6 6. Town Law 4267-1b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, including Code compliant bedroom dimensions, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson),and duly carried,to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey of Breezy Shores prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated Dec. 30, 2010, and the drawings, titled Site Plan(Flotteron) dated 10/30/2013, Ground Floor dated Mar.24,2014 and Flotteron Residence dated Mar. 24,2014 all prepared by Robert I.Brown Architect,P.C., subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2.No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA,except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy,when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board.• Ayes_Members Weisman(Chairperson), Schneider, Horning, Goehringer, Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). - W-e4l Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing /�� /2014 BOARD MEMBERS ® Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 53095 Main Road o P.O.Box 1179 �® SO Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider ��`'® Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONWG BOARD OF APPEALS MEWED, ..) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD + � Tel.(631.)765-1809 a Fax(631)965-9064 J 2 7 f � FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION S. old v��� MEETING OF JULY 19,2012 ZBA FILE: #6557 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(Hernan Otano,Cottage#5) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road(aka Sage Blvd.)Greenport,NY SCTM# 1000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17, 2011 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his recommendation dated November 29, 2011. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25, 2011, The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.5 and is owned by Hernan Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Use Variance under section §280-13 (A)(1)which permits single family detached dwellings, not to exceed one dwelling per lot and from Article XXIII Town Code §280-123 and the Building Inspector's December 12, 2011 Notice of Disapproval, updated March 6, 2012 based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage as; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved unless such building is changed to a conforming use RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a use variance to permit the demolition and reconstruction of an 807 sq.ft. seasonal cottage.The total 807 square feet includes the habitable space;and non-habitable porch,but not Page 2 of 6—July 19,2012 ZBA Filef16557-Otwo CTM 1000-53-5-12.6 the stairs and landing. The need for a use variance is caused by the request to establish an additional use (non- conforming cottage)on a subject property that already has a principal use(dwelling). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant originally applied to the ZBA solely for an area variance for the setback of the cottage to the bulkhead. The bulkhead variance is addressed in ZBA decision #6525. During the initial public hearing on this matter, when questioned on whether the demolition of the structure would cause the structure to lose its pre-existing nonconforming status,the applicant's response was that the structure was not being demolished and that, even it if were, that the structure could be permitted under §280-122. After receiving significant testimony from the applicant's representatives and the Town Building Department,the Board requested that the applicant submit an application for a use variance. As such, the Board will address below the issue of whether.the structure was demolished; whether this structure constitutes a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use; whether§280-122 permits the demolition and reconstruction of a pre-existing nonconforming structure;and whether the applicant is entitled to a use variance. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on December 1,2011,January 5,2012, March 1,2012 and June 7,2012,at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Demolition Based upon the Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department on December 8,2011 and updated on March 6,2012,the proposed action included the demolition and construction of a cottage. It is important to point out that the Notice of Disapproval was issued after a stop work order had been issued on the property-'and prior to the work being completed on the structure.The applicant presented the following testimony/evidence to illustrate that the proposed construction did not constitute a complete demolition of the structure: 1. A floor plan with its original application dated 11/10/2011 indicating"rebuilt existing walls"and"new walls" 2. A memorandum,received on December 28,2011 that included a listing of items that remained in the structure and items that were re-built 3. A letter from an Architect,Robert 1.Brown dated December 13,2011 stating that"less than 50%of the structure had been demolished" At the public hearing on March 1,2012,the Board addressed each item presented by the applicant. The Board noted that the floor plan submitted dated 11/10/2011 indicated that every single external and internal wall of the structure was either being rebuilt or was new. (March 1,2012 Transcript,pg.6 lines 15-25). Additionally,the Board members and representatives from the Building Department noted that based upon the physical inspection and their experience,it appeared that the applicant took the structure apart piece by piece and reconstructed a major portion of the structure. Both the memorandum and letter from Mr.Brown attested to the work that had been performed up to and until December 10,2011 when the stop work order was issued, but did not account for the additional work that would be,required to complete the construction on the structure. Additionally,Mr.Brown's letter did not contain the mathematical support for the calculation,nor did he provide such calculations at or after the public hearing as requested. As such,the statements made therein are simply conclusory with no basis in fact before the Board. On the other hand,and based upon the physical inspection of the structure the Board notes the following items: 1. A new foundation was installed; 2. New plywood siding was installed; Page 3 of 6=July 19,2012 ZBA Fde#6557-Otano CTM- 1000=53-5-12.6 3. New joists were installed; 4. New strapping was installed; 5. A new plate was installed; 6. New plumbing is required; 7. New electric is required; 8. Every window was replaced; 9. Entire porch was replaced; 10. Each wall was replaced; 11. The roof would be replaced; 12. One third of the floor system was replaced. As stated by the Chief Building Inspector at the March 1,2012 hearing(transcript p.24,line 25,p.25 line 1)"[i]f you have four walls and you take four walls down it's a demolition." It is obvious that this structure was taken apart and demolished,piece by piece,and replaced with an entirely new structure. As such,this Board finds that the amount of demolition and reconstruction that took place and will take place to complete this structure amounts to a frill demolition and the loss of any pre-existing nonconforming status that this building maintained prior to the commencement of any construction. Ii.Nonconforming Status of the Structure and Interpretation of§280-122 A. Nonconforming Status of the Structure As set forth above,the December 12,2011 Notice of Disapproval(updated March 6,2012)identified this structure as a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use. Pursuant to§280-123 of the Town Zoning Code; - A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved,except as set forth below,unless the use of such building is changed to a conforming use At the January 5,2012 pubic hearing,when asked to explain the language of the Notice of Disapproval,the Building Department Permits Examiner,Patricia Conklin,testified: "I looked at the paperwork. Saw pictures from the Trustees and determined with the site review,determined that it was a nonconforming building.No. 1 because it is a seasonal cottage and its less than 850 square feet. Therefore it fits the category of a nonconforming building.The second part of that nonconforming use is,it's the second structure as a principal building which is on that property. (January 5,2012 transcript,p 88 lines 11-20) We have a second structure after the principal one and have one lot. And then there are subsequent structures,they are not permitted as of right. So that is why it would be sent to you as a nonconforming use. And then in addition,this is a nonconforming building because it's less than 850 square feet,as defined in the Southold[Town Code]." (January 5,2012 transcript,p. 89 lines 3-12) The applicant presented testimony and case law to this Board to support the argument that the cottage was a nonconforming building with a conforming use that should be considered under§280-122. More specifically,the applicant cited Matter of Dawson v.Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, 12 A.D.3d 444,785 N.Y.S.2d 84(2"d Dept.2004)as legal precedent for the principle that the cottage was a residential use. In Matter of Dawson the Court considered whether a single accessory cottage to a single principle dwelling was a nonconforming building with a conforming use rather than a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use. The analysis was important in that instance to confirm whether the ZBA properly focused upon whether the use had been abandoned for two years under§280-121 which governs nonconforming uses.The Court concluded Page 4 of 6-July 19,2012 ZBA File#6557-O=o CTM: 1000-53-5-12.6 that the cottage was accessory to the principal dwelling and therefore a nonconforming building with a conforming use. As such,the abandonment provisions of the Town code were not applicable and area variances should have been granted. The facts at issue in this instance are clearly distinguishable from the circumstances present in Dawson. Here,the ZBA is not simply dealing with a single family dwelling and a single accessory cottage. While the Court considered the cottage an established accessory use to a principal dwelling,having 28 cottages as an accessory to a residential use is simply not supported by Dawson. Pursuant to§280-13(Axl)each lot in the R-80 zone is allowed to have a one-family detached dwelling, not to exceed one dwelling per lot. The intent of the this section is clearly to limit the number of dwellings and residential uses on a single lot and to reinforce the subdivision regulations set forth in Chapter 240 of the Southold Town Code. This property contains three dwellings and 28 seasonal cottages on a single lot. This is further complicated by the fact that this"cottage"does not meet the definition of a dwelling under§280-4,that"cottages" are not addressed as a permissible use anywhere within the Town Code and the Town does not permit cottages as an accessory to a principle dwelling. As such,this cottage is treated as a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use that requires a use variance. B. Interpretation of§280-122 While it is noted that the ZBA does not have to proceed with this issue because it has determined that a use variance is required,the ZBA will issue a determination on whether§280-122 permits an applicant to demolish and reconstruct a structure,in place and in kind,without the need for further variances,as argued by the applicant. Section 280-122(A)states: Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling,reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. Throughout this proceeding,the applicant has argued that,pursuant to§280-122(A),he was permitted to demolish and reconstruct this structure in place and in kind, in its entirety,without the need for any additional variances: At the public hearing,the ZBA and Building Department provided the applicant with a copy of a memorandum of the ZBA to the Building Department from 2002. (March 1,2012 Transcript,pp 16-21).This memorandum set forth types of"reconstruction"that would not trigger the need for additional variances. Such activities include,but are not limited to:replacement of windows,raising ceiling height without increasing the degree of nonconformity;repair or replacement,in place and in kind,of siding or roofing;or replacement or repair of existing decks,porches or roofs as long as there are no new extension or extensive modifications which increase the degree of nonconformity. From the listing in this memo,it is clear that the ZBA has interpreted§280-122 to allow a property owner to make minor repairs and for minor reconstruction. As such,the term"reconstruction"as used in §280-122(A) does not permit the demolition of an entire structure and replacement in kind without obtaining all required variances. II. Use Variance Application: 1. Town,Law&267-b(2)(b)(1). The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular district where the property is located, demonstrated by competent financial evidence. The applicant provided ample evidence that it is not able to realize a reasonable return from the property without the ability to reconstruct the cottage. The applicant's form of ownership interest in the property is a severely limiting factor. The Applicant retains a share in a cooperative that is governed through a proprietary lease, which permits residential uses only on the property. Any other use permitted under the Town Code is virtually impossible on this property given the cooperative ownership. If not permitted to reconstruct the structure in place and in kind,the applicant's ownership interest has no value and is rendered useless. The applicant Page 5 of 6=July 19,2012 ZBA File#6557-Olano CTM.1000=53-5-12.6 submitted an affidavit regarding the value of the shares in the cooperative,as well as information about comparable sales in the area of the property,as well as information regarding the maintenance and carrying charges on the property. In light of these circumstances,the Board finds that the applicant cannot realize a reasonable return on his property,interest. 2. Town Law 6267-b(2)(b)(2).The hardship is unique to the property and it does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood. As set forth above„this property is unique given its historic context and the pre- exiting nonconforming nature of the entire community. It is one of a limited number of properties in Southold Town that retain multiple seasonal cottage uses and the only property of this size.The grant of a use variance here will not create a precedent that would apply to other lots in the community and the decision will apply only to this property. 3. Town Law 8267-bL2)(b)(D. The requested use variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. With respect to preserving the character of the neighborhood, it is noted that this parcel is a separate enclave that is sectioned off from the surrounding community. It is an 82 acre parcel, with access via a gated private road. Only those persons who live within Breezy Shores have access thereto. The community is seasonal'and the residents utilize the structures primarily from April through October. The seasonal structures are strategically located to take advantage of the water views. Additionally,the location of the reconstructed structure is appropriate within the context of this neighborhood,as the adjacent structures are similarly situated,the location of the structure is where it was originally and the size of the structure will remain unchanged. 4. Town Law 8267-Y2Xb)E The alleged hardship has not been self-created. The applicant purchased his interest in the Breezy Shores community and the subject seasonal cottage in 2002. This structure had been in existence for many years and the Breezy Shores community required that the applicant make certain repairs to update the structure,which started with replacing the foundation. Upon raising the house,the applicant discovered that the condition of the structure was significantly worse than expected and that major reconstruction was necessary to make it safe and habitable. 5. Town,Law &267-b. Grant of this use variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proven by the applicant, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRAN the use variance as applied for,subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2. No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA,other than necessary minor repairs,as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan andlor survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use,setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Page6 of6-July 19,2012 ZBA Fite#6557-Otano CTM 1000-53-5-12.6 The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board.' Ayes.Members Weisman(Chairperson),Goehringer,Schneider,horning. Nay•Member Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1). Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Approved for filing /q/ /2012 BOARD MEMBERS OF $QSouthold Town Hall S [/rh, Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson � D 53095 Main Road •P.O. Box 1179 �� l0 Southold,NY l 1971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing A YO 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider 100U (,� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R t ED S q Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 `* 27 a FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION So t&id Tov n erk MEETING OF JULY 19,2012 ZBA FILE: 6525 NAME OF APPLICANT:Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Hernan Otano, Cottage#5) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road(aka Sage Blvd,) Greenport,NY SCTM41000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17,2011 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to;be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated November 29, 2011. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards.' PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25, 2011. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages, In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 5 and is owned by Hernan Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116 and the Building Inspector's October 14, 2011, amended October 18, 2011, amended to clarify description of structure dated December 8,2011,Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, existing cottage is a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. Page 2 of 3—July 19,2012 ZBA Fileil6525J-Otano CTM 1000-53-5-12 6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to reconstruct a cottage that was demolished and "as built" construction with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a bulkhead setback of 50 feet where the code requires 75 feet. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing,the applicant was asked to separate the two variance requests: 1)the nonconformity to be considered under the use variance standards, and 2)the bulkhead setback under the area variance standards. The use variance application was reviewed under Zoning Board file#6557. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant was given a building permit to lift the cottage off the foundation and replace' the foundation to conform with FEMA requirements. The applicant demolished the cottage without benefit of a'building permit. The cottage is part of an incorporated community. In 1985, a prior owner applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals under file #3320 for permission for a 19 lot subdivision of this property; the request was denied. In 1994, the original owner applied to this Board for permission to continue a discontinued use of renting the,, cottages, the application was deemed inactive and closed since the applicant never provided the additional requested documents. It is also noted that this property does not have 280A approval. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 1,2011,January 5, 2012, March 1, 2012 and June 7,2012 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus, no adjacent property owner will'be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the 1940's, when operation of the brick factory slowed, cottages were rented to summer guests, Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method-feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. While this Board recognizes the existing proprietary lease on the property that limits the applicant with respect to where he can build a replacement cottage structure, given the ample size,of the property, it is feasible for the applicant to construct this structure in a conforming location. It is noted that the proprietary lease is a document that can be changed based upon the needs of the community and its owners. Additionally,the proprietary lease cannot take precedent over the Town Zoning Code. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial, representing 33%relief from the code. However, in the context of the entire community the variance is not substantial. The non- conforming cottage units have existed in the current location since the 1940's, with each cottage unit in a similar location. The location and size of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) A variance in this residential community will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant has stated that it is not feasible to relocate the cottage due to the extent of the flood zone this parcel is located in. Additionally, the changes made to the foundation have made the structure compliant with FEMA, Finally, the applicant shall be required to conform to the requirements of Chapter 236 of the code regarding storm water runoff. 5 Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the Page 3 ora—July 19,2012 ZBA Filcit6525-Otano CTM 1000-53-5-12 6 limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. Additionally, the applicant proceeded with a demolition/construction of this structure without the benefit of a building permit. 6. Town Law $267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new seasonal cottage unit while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community, RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the architectural drawings labeled site plan,floor plan, and east, west, waterside and entry side elevations, prepared by Fairweather Design Associates dated 11/10/2011 and stamped received by the Board of Appeals on November 10,2011, CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage 2, No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs, as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued, Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a passible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation fi-om the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving noneonformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed to this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that a de minima in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity Vote of the Board. Ayes Members Weisman(Chairperson), Coehringer,Schneider, Horning Nay Age er Dinizio This Resolution was duly adopted(4-1) Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 7 /.23 /2012 BOARD MEMBERS rtg SOFT Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairpersons �'� 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 �� l0 Southold,NY 11971-0959 > Office Location: Gerard P. Goehringer en ac Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® er@ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider COMM, Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northforl,.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSE EIVED TOWN OF SOUTH �{— I C) Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax (631)765-9064 M R 7 2013 FIN , DINGS DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION utho To'Wer' MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28,2013 ZBA FILE: 6622 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community, Inc, (Naomi Mullman)SCTM#1000-53-05-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Rd, Cottage#11, (adj.to Shelter Island Sound)Greenport, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 8, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 8, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building,two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000,a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community,Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. I1 and is owned by Naomi Mullman.All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young, LS., entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman, Cottage 11,Breezy Shores, dated July 6, 2012, revised Aug. 1, 2012 for General Amendments, Sheets 1 of 2,and 2 of 2. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116 (B) and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2012 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to a seasonal cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: 411 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25) aka Sage Blvd. (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport,NY Page 2 of 3—February 28,2013 ZBA File#6622—Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc (Mullman) CTM 1000-53'-5-12 6(cottage til l) RELIEF REOUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct an addition and alterations to a seasonal cottage with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is,:changed to a conforming use, and a bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet (as shown on the survey) where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Board received a letter dated February 1, 2013 from the President of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans, FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 7, 2013 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(&b)(D. Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory, in thel 940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size, 2. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use with a pre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet. Therefore, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of',20.6 square feet to the existing bathroom is 3.1%of the pre-existing cottage foot print which the Board deems to be de minimus in nature and necessary to bring the existing bathroom up to code with a minimum square footage that is functionally practical.All other proposed alterations will be constructed in place and in kind.The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B) is mathematically substantial, representing 27%relief from the code.However, in the context of the entire community, the variance is not substantial.The nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback. The location of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code, 5. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However,to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law 5267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 3—February 28,2013 ZBA Filet16622—Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc (Mullman) CTM. 1000-53-5-12.6(cottage tl11) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD; In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT,the variances as applied for,and shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman, Cottage 11, Breezy Shores, dated July 6,2012,revised Aug. 1, 2012 for General Amendments, Sheets I of 2, and 2 of 2. And the architectural drawings prepared by David Mullman, R.A., as follows; Sheets A-1 and A-2 dated 8/13/12 last revised 11/12/2012 titled"Site Plan for Proposed Renovation", and "Photo of Existing Cottage", sheet DG-100.00 dated 10/16/12 last revised 10/25/12, sheets A-]01,A-102, A-103 all dated 10/19/12 and last revised 10/25/12 CONDITIONS; 1, The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2,No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department, That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued, Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible dental by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board, Ayes Members Weisman(Chairperson,)Horning, Goehringer,Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0) Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 2 L5- /2013 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®� so 53095 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P.Go iger George Horning Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank n � ;•c 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider ®!�c®u Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.noithfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1509 o Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 25,2013 ZBA FILE: 6660 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community,Inc. (Ido Mizrahy) SCTM 1000-53-5.12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road Cottage #25 (aka State Route 25 and Sage Blvd.) (adj. to Shelter Island Sound),Greenport,NY SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's Lit of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated May 15, 2013 stating that this application is conside"red a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) policy Standards. The LVvRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated June 24, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel, also known as Breezy Shores, is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard), and thero e rty is south to Shelter Island Sound. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in adjacent history of the Town. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing, non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages originally housed employees of the Sage family brick factory until it ceased operations, and subsequently, then were rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community, Inc., was established by the group and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 25, and is owned by Ido Mizrahy. This cottage is shown on the survey drawn by Howard W.Young,sheets 1-3, dated March 04, 2013, and building plans drawn by Frank W. Uellendahl, Registered Architect, sheets Al-3, dated April 30, 2013, with latest revision dated July 11, 2013 to shown all proposed additions, and the proposed increase in size from the building existing footprint. Page 3 of 3—luly 25,2013 7.BA 116660—Breezy Shores Community.Inc.(Mizrahy) SCTMN 1000-53-5-12.6 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of renovations to a seasonal cottage,while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Homing, seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to GRANT,the variance/variances as applied for, and shown on the survey drawn by Howard W.Young, sheets 1-3,dated March 04,2013,and building plans drawn by Frank W. Uellendahl,Registered Architect,sheets A-1,A- 2,A-4 dated April 30,2013,and sheet A-3 with latest revision dated July 11,2013 to shown all proposed additions, and the proposed increase in size from the building existing footprint.Subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1.The cottage use will continue in its current status as an unheated seasonally occupied dwelling. 2.No other alterations or additions may be undertaken without review by the ZBA,except for necessary minor repairs as determined by the Town Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy,when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate-the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board- Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Coehringer, ,Schneider, Dantes, Horning This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing�� /2013 BOARD MEMBERS ®� so Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ®�� �/®� 53095 Main Road®P.O.Box 1179 Eric Dantes w: ® Southold,NY 11971-0959 K. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �® ® ,,�\J® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider lac®U ��.tl Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.noithfork.net ZONIIN s BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809©Fax(631)765-9064 FINDINGS,DELIEBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MMETING OF JULY 25,2013 ZBA FILE# 6661 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community,Inc. (Graham Willoughby) SCTM#1000-53-05-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road Cottage 413 (aka State Route 25 and Sage Blvd.) (adj. to Shelter Island Sound),Greenport,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated May 15, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for-review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated June 27, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000,a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community, Inc.,was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 13 and is owned by Graham Willoughby and Emily Williams. All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,entitled Survey for Cottage 13 "Breezy Shores"at Greenport, dated Jan. 09,2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123A and the Building Inspector's March 7,2013, amended May 2, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a Page 3 of 3-July 25,2013 ZBA#6661—Breezy Shores Community,Inc.(Willoughby) SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2.No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote oj'the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Dantes, Horning. This Resolution was duly adopted(5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 71-3. /2013 BOARD MEMBERSSouthold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson � $a(/��� 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ® �.® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider C® �� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net O�® ®F�"I�I�A�..S RECEIVED TOWN OFS® OLD 9!:al��$l� Tel.(631)765-1809.Fax(631)765-9064 f� JUf 3 2015 uth®Id T® t Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND IDETE2<M[NATION MEETING OF JUNE 18,2015 ZBA FILE#6862 NAME OF APPLICANT:BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY,INC.(MARTHA BROOKS) PROPERTY LOCATION: Cottage #4 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25)aka Sage Blvd.(adj.to Shelter Island Sound)Greenport,NY.SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADNDNISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated June 2, 2015 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated May 26, i 2015. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to us,it is our recommendation that the proposed action is .CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres.It is improved with three dwellings,a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages.In 2000,the community established a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no.4 and is owned by Martha Brooks.All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,dated January 9,2013 and a site plan by Robert I Brown,Architect,dated August 18,2014. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance(s)from Article XM Code Section 280-123,Article XXH Section 280-116(B)and the Building Inspector's January 12,2015 Notice of Disapproval based on i Page 2 of 3—June 18,2015 ZBA Fife#6862—Breezy Shores(Brooks) SUM#1000-53-5-12.6 an application for building permit to add and alter,to include raising an existing seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged,reconstructed,structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. RELIEF STED: The applicant requests variances to make alterations to a seasonal cottage with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a non-conforming bulkhead setback of 59.5 feet where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Board received a letter dated July 29,2014 from the Secretary of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 4,2015 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law&267-b(3)(b)LD. Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal.These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory.In the I940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law§267-b(3 (b)(2).The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre- existing non-conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use with a pre-existing non- conforming bulkhead setback of 59.4 feet. Therefore, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law&267-b 3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. The variance for Section 280-123 represents 100%relief because the code prohibits the enlargement of non- conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However,the proposed addition of a door with a 4'x 4' landing on the west side of the cottage and a sliding glass door with a 4' by 8' landing on the East side of the cottage will add 2.22%to the existing footprint. This is in line with de minimus additions the ZBA has granted in previous decisions. In the context of the entire community,the variance is not substantial. The variance for the bulkhead setback is substantial representing 21%relief from the code. However,the nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback.The Iocation of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town_Law 11267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. Page 3 of 3—June 18,2015 ZBAMOOR—Breezy Shores(Brooks) SCFM#1000-53-5-12.6 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)Q. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time;of purchase.However,to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law §267-1i. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. (- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD:In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dantes, seconded by Member Goehringer,and duly carried,to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the Architectural plans by Robert I. Brown, Architect labeled site plan, foundation plan, existing floor plan, road side, west, water side, and east elevations,and section for phases I and II and dated March 3,2015. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or apossible denial by the Building Department of a buildingpermit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited,above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree ofnonconformity. Pursuant to Chapter 250-146(8) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1) year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Schneider,Horning,Dante,Goehringer.This Resolution was duly adopte (5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing N /.A.2— /2015 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Ball Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson � so �® 53095 Main Road o P.O.Box 1179 �® �® Southold,NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer esu Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George horning ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider Til Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSE "VED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �— t D- Tel.(631)765-1809 a Fax(631)765-9064 M9 R 7 2013 RATIONS AND DETEIIN111NATIO utho q0VWer FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28,2013 ZBA FILE: 6622 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community,Inc. (Naomi Mullman)SCTM41000-53-05-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION:65490 Main Rd,Cottage#11,(adj.to Shelter Island Sound)Greenport,NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 8, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 8, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres.It is improved with three dwellings,a brick building,two garages,28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds.The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town.The access to the property is via a private road(Sage Boulevard)and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound.The multiple cottages on the property are a pre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s.The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000,a real estate cooperative,Breezy Shores Community,Inc.,was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative.The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 11 and is owned by Naomi Mullman.All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman,Cottage 11,Breezy Shores,dated July 6,2012,revised Aug. 1,2012 for General Amendments,Sheets 1 of 2,and 2 of 2. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXII Section 280-116(B)and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2012 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to a seasonal cottage at; 1)a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: #11 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25) aka Sage Blvd. (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport,NY. Page 2 of 3—February 28,2013 ZBA Filek6622—Breezy Shores Comm.,Inc.(Mullman) CTM IGN-53-5-12.6(cottage#11) _RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct an addition and alterations to a seasonal cottage with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement,reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use,and a bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet(as shown on the survey)where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFOR1i9ATION: The Board received a letter dated February 1, 2013 from the President of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 7,2013 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board fends the following facts to be true and relevant;and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law§267-b(3)(b)(D. Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties.This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties.Thus,no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal.These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the 1940's,when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests.Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law 6267-b(&apJ( The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is a pre-existing non- conforming building with a pre-existing non-conforming use with a pre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet. Therefore,any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 5267-bQ)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement of non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. however,the proposed addition of 20.6 square feet to the existing bathroom is 3.1%of the pre-existing cottage foot print which the Board deems to be de minimus in nature and necessary to bring the existing bathroom up to code with a minimum square footage that is functionally practical.All other proposed alterations will be constructed in place and in kind.The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B)is mathematically substantial,representing 27%relief from the.code.however,in the context of the entire community,the variance is not substantial.The nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback.The location of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Lmw &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 267-b(3)(b)a. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.however,to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure,the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law &267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 3—February 28,2013 ZBA File#6622—Breezy Shores Comm,Inc (Mullman) CTM.1000-53-5-12.6(cottage#11) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried,to GRANT,the variances as applied for,and shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young,L.S.,entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman,Cottage 11,Breezy Shores,dated July 6,2012,revised Aug. 1,2012 for General Amendments,Sheets 1 of 2,and 2 of 2.And the architectural drawings prepared by David Mullman,R.A.,as follows:'Sheets A-1 and A-2 dated 8/13/12 last revised 11/12/2012 titled"Site Plan for Proposed Renovation",and "Photo of Existing Cottage",sheet DG-100.00 dated 10/16/12 last revised 10/25/12,sheets A-101,A-102,A-103 all dated 10/19/12 and last revised 10/25/12 CONDITIONS: 1.The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2.No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA,other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use,setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members. Weisman(Chairperson,)Horning,Goehringer,Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson Approved for filing ,' /2013 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval,use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a fare:operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Z2,a,6&,v f '/ ��e Gl�ll 46kd� ,�� 2. Address of Applicant: 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant):, �2y�gl�l�lzEs L��ll�!lJ.Ul 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project: 44F7— Ct1 W#/—f=—: ?V AL 0,ro /Zeal& Fii�"d AVC? 21 OF 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? Yes { No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes X No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff,it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937)or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. Cilt'ez5779!`( � l ("/ &,Ll< 726 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) 7 130 12015 Signature of Applicant Date Note- 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. tjo I 32Nd PUBINJvd ❑ :(Sjioads)1ag1O ❑ ognnb�,g aanljnoiagv ;sa.►oJ [:](uvgcngns)Ivlluapts Iu�oaawwo lvi►lsn l❑ (alnllnot.2u-uou)juin-d uugzn❑ •uoasodo.�d agl.�uau puu�uluiofpu`uo.�noao ql sasn puvl Ila�loag� •� Sam a; Liosuods loafoid so luuogddu oql Xq polloiluoo jo poumo(salpadoid snon2lluoo Xuv puu alis joafold)a&uaaou Iuloy•o sacov Lpagrnlslp XlluolsXgd aq o;a2uoiou Ivlo L•q s310v Luollou posodoid ogl,jo ails agldo auajou IuloZ•u•E .Iunoad v jo I!uuod puu awvu(s)Xoua&v lsij`saA.Ij S21A ON Z/ioua5V lvluawu.�ano�aaglo�Cuv wo.g�ujpunj.�o lunoiddu`I!uuod u ambo.uopou posodoid agl soo(I •Z •Z uoilsonb of onuiluoo`ou jj •Z l-►vd of paaowd puv c4Ilvd►oiunw oql ui poloajjv aq X73ut lvgl soomosai luluawuomAua aql puu Uo[l013 pasodoid ogldo lualu[agl jo uo►ldl.tosop aA1lvlavu u goujjv`saA 3I Luoiluln2ol ao alnl aAllvJlslulwpu SHA ON `aouvulp.Io`mtj luool`avid u jo uolldopu anllulsl3al aql anjonuI Cluo U011073p3sodoid agl saoQ•I ry :opoo dIZ :alvls _ :Od/X1IO :ssoippd ��'���j ��I�7� I►�y�_� e--7,�� h 71��ZI �� :auogda[a b :.iosuodS io luuollddd•jo awvM V�5 1V1JVL7cY :uoilod pasodoid jo uoilduosaa•joilg 0A-7 9 7 :(dew uolluool n gou„u pun ag6josop)uoguoo-1 loa fo.1d :loafold ao uoIj3V Jo awulq uoljuut.lgjul iosuodS puu laafoid-I I.Iud •wal[Xuu luowajddns of tivssaoau su s32vd Iuuoiltppu goullu.Xouo2-e peal oqj of Iryasn io Xq papaau oq ll!M analloq noA golgm uotivw.�o3ul Ivuotl!ppv�Cuv aplAoid oslu�Cuw noA I dud ul swan IIu alaldwoO •uo►luwjojul lua.uno uo posvq alq►ssod sv Xjg2noaogj su iomsuv osuald`wall Xuv of puodsol Allnd of papaau oq pjnom uogL,!3gsanul 10 g31vosol luuoilippu•jl •alqullunu Xlluaiano uolluwaodul uo posvq I laud olaldwoO •uotivoglJaA 1;)glln3 01 loa fgns aq Atu pug`MOIAaz oilgnd of loafgns azu`5ulpun3.�o Iunoiddu loj uoiluoilddu ogl,jo laud aw000q sosuodsa-j -I pud,jo uol;aldtuoa oqj iqj ajgjsuodsaa sl iosuods;oafoad' .io jumilddu aq,j, •uolluw.lojul jmfo ld- I mud BU!JaIcItUO3 Joj suoi;an.[;suI UIJ0,j duaauSSasSVjvjuazuuoaInug laozIS W Mpuaddd OZ'L I9 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: V/ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: V/ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? -74 b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Ide ify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: S oreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO AYES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? IST/NO❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and orm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM TH T THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLED Applicant/sp 0 ^A Ox I �G��� Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a,public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) 41 residing at 0214 (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) (�L D�_/&YXi A)y YJ�_165 do hereby authorize '72414/1 K LZE ZL:::C-> Pgee< PIZ) (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on py behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. W (Owner's Signature) i J � sdr 5C A LOQ (Print 0 's Name) Lei 15 0 S Z4 J s S uEc"AAA rl Q L o N l C. Ko LA-5 J3 L-r—_C+1 vt'� iLl C0C0- oP PF'�`=,••,�2f6�F��,fav+�.:S?.'a,."^"u;ri',�_`�:�4�ZA �.:�"` x?u�„ yrt» -A-,r, - ;k•. _."`�.�,, , -., •w'- _ _ - , �..�:c*;w- �"�, _ _��'�Y:�,s2� �:; ,qv "''*a;rjr,,:,- ,ti'c,-� - - _ - _ `.r, _ - ;.r•_.._ _'fs=`.": , -T a•}j'*4 --�C*C4 '!x—^� .:�.'z--`.y�%��Fc�� ___ _ _ _ ____ �i.,.- =-__ i-_,�.`s.;}a'4,�'..r��,__ �•j'h�r= _ �d`,t?i ..y6 � _ -l'A=s v:�"�.?-_ _ _�T:��i- x .: .-. iY..t4�-'.y�.i. _ _ -`r_�l�.-_,e">A=vr,.5�•n�'-'; �+ ;'� � �� � •.. �.. 'Y Y �z�1�.`-, I�„Vai.,yY��wa;^� ,�bt„7-s� '"Lt nyw.x• :,a,-t=��r ,�,�+ y` �,�.-'»»t����;':• �;eas r � ;:., Tx:>�,�-"sc;,�,�r �n-?:'�c-d� c�:��L7t�v.�A_s• ,�,�;� -�'r:?� `;sem;. -�,.- .,r..4 r-a-na��;=�':�'�. �. SW'��a�.�i'='xrs3�=',.��,'"�rr ;t�.,... ������,,•�-s�."��'��,` '"�n.c... BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY, INC. P.O. BOX 925 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 Peconlcpalnt!ng@bellsouth.net January 29, 2016 To Whom It May Concern: The Board of Breezy Shores, Inc., has approved the renovation plans of cottage number 8 (Jason Schmidt, et al, shareholders). Thank you, The Board: Steve Flotteron, Naomi Mullman, Ido Mizrahi, Peter Sakas, Judy Barron Judy Barron, secretary APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of Possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: GJCII�II� i1 �Lsd�?��' (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP 412 Submitted this ±:21 day of L li 0 20� Signature N I Print Name �u►S S��q S S L C A -t 11/� ro -Df fff f►2�J.oL.a F�2S 0,4 Ne--a- S AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : - 19L/_ (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance V Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent, or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest. "Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If Yes,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer, director,partner,or employee of the applicant; or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this Jed �Vo ,20 Signature Print Name Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): (N0(,.L, r,6e Town Board 0 Planning Dept. E Building Dept. V Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital 0 construction, planning activity,agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: R/ Nature and extent of action: Location of action: &-G4 Site acreage: R-69 Present land use: (712F,-�-; QEin GO tt" 4wic�EP-R-Tl Vim' Present zoning classification: /1? —)Sc� 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: ZQ.JEtF- '{i6 U VjZA�,--5 efVkj Q d'T( ((p (b) Mailing address_7.6C.W14107-, 6.32 A 'WWO 'P- D.ear Ole¢ (c) Telephone number:Area Code( Q-6 q14- 2�- (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes VNo❑ If yes,which state or federal agency? �t=G 'ez-D;4 . DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes [:] No M(ot Applicable- please explain) PM ED A00Lr-nCc LS �t�T1TL� fZUC77'lZ� ?� T34E7 /F71g�C) -� ! 70 bel ' Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No I I (Not Applicable—please explain) C3y�4-77 4::a2 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes F_� No R/(Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST PVLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pap 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes E No (Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 throug 21 for evaluation criteria EYes � No (Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation riteria. R Yes 0 No (Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No M/(Not Applicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize envimunental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 4ot Applicable—please explain) PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the To7((NNot uthold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeED No pplicable—please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See WRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes [:] No (Not Applicable— please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Prom5fNot tainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Tow . See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ NoApplicable—please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65for eva ation criteria. Applicable—please explain Yes 1:1 No Not Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promoteappr priate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; P es 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes El No Not Applicable—please explain Frank Uellendahl Subject: FW: ZBA - PHOTO#1 - BREEZY#8 Yf�_ V Y S __ '•exp f z++ a x lk ZBA APPLICATION BREEZY SHORES— COTTAGE #8; PHOTO #1 —WEST DIRECTION; DATE: 10.28.2015 1 Frank Uellendahl Subject: FW: ZBA- PHOTO #2 - BREEZY#8 ix w- f .r C, ii*At 1 - y ZBA APPLICATION BREEZY SHORES—COTTAGE#8; PHOTO#2—NORTH DIRECTION; DATE: 11.30.2015 1 Frank Uellendahl Subject: FW: ZBA- PHOTO#3 - BREEZY#8 j ZBA APPLICATION BREEZY SHORES— COTTAGE #8; PHOTO#3—NORTH DIRECTION; DATE: 10.28.2015 1 RUN-OFF CALCULATION FOR 2"OF RAIN TO BE CONTAINED ON SITE PROPOSED 8'DIA. X 2' DEEP DRYWELL 84.5 Cu.Ft. EXT'G FOOTPRINT OF COTTAGE 706 SF PROPOSED COTTAGE 725 SF : 100% run-off coefficient = 149 Cu ft WITH GUTTER LEADERS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF (TYP/) PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 727 SF ® ADDITION & ALTERATIONS �2 CAMERA LOCATION FOR PHOTO VIEW #2 PROPOSED 21 SF ADDITION INCREASED COVERAGE 2.98 7 = 21 SF C-9 C-10 C-7 CT8 _ STAUSS C-6 = ._ -. _ COTTAGE •- '_' = GREENPORT, NY -' g #8 BREEZY SHORES ARCHITECT FRANK UELLENDAHL e 123 CENTRAL AVENUE OS - P.0 Box 316 o GREENPORT,NY 11944 TEL-631-477 8624 OWNERS JASON SCHMIDT U CORY JACOBS Q LUISE STAUSS co NICHOLAS BIL HMAN tD 632A 3rd STREET (n BROOKLYN,NY 11215 3 TEL 917-691-3732 3' LANDING M z PROPOSED 6'DIA. X 3' DEEP Cr) DRYWELL - 67 Cu.Ft. ? 3 N o -irf� .GRASS: Z m . _ . . . . . . . . o 0 EXISTING BULKHEAD = TIDAL WETLANDS BOUNDARY a R DATE- 02/02/2016 3 SCALE 1/16'=1'-0, SCALE: 1/16" l'-O" PEBBLE BEACH 2 _._- -- - ------- ,- - ED SITE PLAN: SITE PLAN SCTM# = 1000-53-05-12.6 L _ _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - _ �a DWO NAME _— _ ___ ' ." f i_. _ f^ -- -=^- -^= SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S A-1 _-= _ -- - ----- 8 ig DWG NO SHELTER ISLAND SOUND L------------------ - _---==-- - __=-_-----_- __--___-_�__�___-� I 14 rON9 JAR J L Q� pow � " d P ter'^' � �•'"'_"`�.._..�^ �P-,�„"' r f�f/�/ lei ff Tjr I �1 �(,,,T q� _ � �2n d,p� o i•�, � Ig ...�t�v Jy�.,� ^, /,/Q/ ✓ti �" i � -ll-err ` e V p � � J � ,' �Y t(//''+•pR�Yal�.�"�"f�'r t���''`t��`lb ab K".f''� - S`�°3, \,r AAadJ^\"\ I 5/-J n'n,w,r" �, 'py�y�Yt�a•y�/Nn,µ5Ntt1E9, V OND I c �1 1 o S 6• °1 /Gw , s rya ry 'is O �6, So as, 4.2q \ \ / m� > S y0mQ ® 46 \ \ �6U �F pp�5/6F-USH LINE T 9�6 0' .20�,_ 4 V`r 7- ® 6 4p � ' ®4` 34•en,, ® $ �� 6 °� � � © c oq •�6 ea ® S g, ?g $ \ 8 8 .0'7 oU(n � 4 �� � 4 © • i 10� N" Q n 0) X44, n v �aa $O 146' �� © - �S $`2' \�, ,44' 8. o ry �� �.N b,o © g3 \ a 4`16 g6, ry 1.9 n144604-1 rym lY iN m Q � ryry mry r o 0 0 aa4, m CF 6� \ 9'-9 1/2° 7'-3 1/2" PROPOSED 41' 5'-0° 3'-s" ® EXT'G WALL ® ADDITION & 41, 6'-6° NEW WALL o ALTERATIONS A21 z PROPOSED 21SF ADDITION W M A21 V -' DUIOGGR a SHOWER � SOS HALF BATH WOH26310 WDH2642 WDH2642 EXISTING COVERAGE \ BR 2 OF COTTAGE EXCLUDINGTPRINT OUTDOOR SHOWER 706.0 SF COTTAGE REMOVE DOSTING CEILING GREENPORT, NY 3 \ / 30°z80" \ IN THIS AREA / PROPOSED COVERAGE #8 BREEZY SHORES CATHEDRAL CEILING I I \ / RAILING BEDROOM ADDITION + 21 SF = 727 SF o ARCHITECT LANDING ADDITION 10 SF EXEMPT j FRANK UELLENDAHL 0 °a 123 CENTRAL AVENUE CATHEDRAL CEILING TOTAL ADDITION 21 SF = 2.98 � 2 PO BOX 316 / \ 00 I I 3"80" o GREENPORT,NY 11944 TEL 631-477 8624 / BR 1 \ KITCHEN /LR/DR \ SUNROOM `° 3 / \ CLG.HGT.= 7'-3" / \ CLG.HGT.= 7'-0" 3'-0" F OWNERS ON SCHMIDT REMOVE EXISTING CEILING J�CORY JACOBS / IN THIS AREA \ / \ THE PRPOPOSED PORCH LANDING WISESTAUSS THE TO BE 3 FT WIDE TO COMPLY WITH CODE NICHOLAS STREET IT IS EXEMPT FROM COUNTING IN THE BROOKLYN,NY 11215 } AW251 ELECTRICAL 'Yw WOH2O36 WOH26310 WDH2642 WDH2642 FOOTPRINT COVERAGE, TEL 917-691-3732 9--7- Boz 13'-to° tt'-5 1/2" 7'-4 1/2" THE MINIMUM SIZE OF LANDINGS IN FRONT � 9'-9 1/2" 7'-31/2' 5'-0" 3'-s° PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN OF SINGLE DOORS IS 3'x3.' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" o 0 PROPOSED ALTERATIONS OUTDOOR � SHOWER ; - FOUNDATION TO BE REPLACED WITH g C� MIN. 36" DEEP 10" DIA CONCRETE FOOTINGS - COTTAGE TO BE LIFTED UP TO ALLOW REF THE INSTALLATION OF NEW FOOTINGS o AND THE REPLACEMENT OF ANY ROTTED s FLOOR JOISTS -STRUCTURE TO BE RAISED +/- 10"TO MEET FEMA FLOOD PLAIN REQUIREMENTS o 00 -SUNROOM AND BATHROOM FRAMING TO BE o= ALTERED TO MEET LEGAL CEILING HEIGHT 00 BEDROOM KITCHEN LR/DRjSUNROOM - NEW REPLACEMENT WINDOWS - NEW HARDIE BOARD SIDING, CLAPBOARD & DATE• 02/02/2016 CLG.HGT.= 7'-3" CLG.HGT.= 7'-3" CLG.HGT.= 7'-3" G,HGT.= 6'-5" - NEW ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES 3 SCALE 3/16•=1'-0• F EXISTING & NO CHANGE IN ROOF LINE PROPOSED; ELT � FLOOR PLANS 44'-3 1/2" � 5=a DWG NAME EXISTING FLOOR PLAN ® DWG NO A-2 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" PROPOSED ® ADDITION & o ALTERATIONS u STRUM C®RAGE z GREENPORT, NY #B BREEZY SHORES ARCHITECT ❑ ❑ ® ® ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ o FRANK UELLENOAH6 9 123 CENTRAL AVENUE POBOX IN 316 o GREENPORT,NY 11944 OUTDOOR SHOWER TEL 631-477 6624 ENCLOSURE OWNERS NOT SHOWN HEREJ JASON SCHMIDT CORY JACOBS LUISE STAUSS NICHOLAS BLECHMAN 632A 3rd STREET BROOKLYN,NY 11215 ❑ C/ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 3 TEL 917-691-3732� I k s 2 El FTI a g ® ® ® ❑ ❑ ❑ DATE 02/02/2016 a SCALE 3/16°=1'-0° EXISTING - ELEVATIONS WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION o Z� DWG NAME EXISTING ELEVATIONS ;-::g & A-3 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0° ®:� DWG NO 111111111111111111111111 11 1 1 - (IIII(III��Iu. I 11 11 1 1111111111 - — =11111-11111�11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,nuummmmmmnmmmnwmmmmumu„��� .� :• ,, I CT FRANK UELUENDAHI. u�l�li ■■■ I I p — 123 CENTRAL AVENUE LETEL 631-477 8624 CORY JACOBS NICHOLAS BLECHMAN u 11 u u - -. OWNERSJASON SCHMIDT 632A 3rd STREET - �- _ .--- BROOKLYN, TEL 917-691-3732 I LINE m m m IN mouss WNW -ME DATE 02/02/2016 ----- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ■■�■� z DWG NO (� PROPOSED ® ADDITION & o ® ALTERATIONS 2X4 R.R. @ 16" O.C. w/ R-15 STONE WOOL INSULATION HOT WATER HEATER l IN ALL PROPOSED CATHEDRAL CEILINGS TO BE RELOCATED TO ATTIC l HURRICANE CLIPS EACH RAFTER 67AU03 EACH IRAFTERLIPS STORAGE GREENPORT, NY f- - _ _ - _ _ -- -- - .- -- - -- -- --_ v_ _ #B BREEZY SHORES (2) 1.75"x 9.5" LVL BEAM ARCHITECT FRANK UELLENDAHL 123 CENTRAL AVENUE RAISE CEILING TO 7'-0" I 9 P090K 316 AS PER CODE o GREENPORT,NY 11944 8624 EXT'G WALL AND CEILING 1x6 HORIZONTAL PINE PLANKS (TYP.) \ TEL 631-477 OWNERS TO BE REMOVED JASON SCHMIDT CORY JACOBS LUISE STAUSS d NICHOLAS BLECHMAN O _ I 632A 3rd STREET BROOKLYN,NY 11215 TEL 917-691-3732 2X4 STUD WALL co I _ w/ R-15 STONE WOOL INSULATION - ( BR 2 MBR BATH ' y 6'-6" 8'-10 1/2' R EACH STUD TO BE STRAPPED TO BOX — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2X10 F.J. @ 16 ",O.C. SISTERED TO EXT'G 2X6 F.J. w/ R-30 STONE WOOL INSULATION `i s 6 1/2" TRT'D PLYWOOD N 3.5" X 11.75' TRT'D PSL BEAM Le PB 44 STANDOFF BEAM BASE 'F - CEDAR LATTICE APRON 1 8" DIA. POURED CONC. FOOTING z RIGID PLASTIC FOOTING FORMDATE D2/D2/2D16 a SCALE 1/2'=1'-0' FOUNDATION NOTES Aa 71 STRENGTH = 3000 PSI AT 28 DAY ASTM C-94 e CROSS SECTION READY MIX CONCRETE. 1 -10 1 -10 ` 5 DWC NAME ALL FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, ETC SHALL REST ON 1'-2" s A-5 UNDISTURBED SOIL. ®a Dwc No ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE FORMED, J 16 -6 ... _....., _ ,.n••.,x+,...,._wr..�. sctteF}rhSGsn fir: "' -�". "'.iRAi?�e'YSgL,.,:.t.—WY'AwSg9°,Ott„4k'^G+`tlztti '6;finaiiu'Si 'rF''�''. r i—:.a.'s:lpvSYe%i.tPe!'� gt&1kr)iMFt�anSg�a'sr+dro%L+.r3ce:�4 i4:.5 Ila OF SOUTHOLD PROOEkTY `.- RECORD CARD OWNER,_ STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT �hC�r101� �-- �� '��I' �n•`jp�l•�Q15 � I r( ��r.7C1G� t�Y'C��'!-S _ G7�t' I FOR ER OW Elia N R E ACR. 'Ca• �1 61' V e W eek- � L� 0-6 ��� ^� ( 1 �I c n �s 1 �:� I c_. � � � _��,�` I . ��'•. b:_��c �l Vic_^ I Cc v 1P vv P'nq IZ.� S W TYPE OF BU FIJ��- y `yC'-�{ �C " t•�� 1 -''c"_�''i•( lc. ���CIf Si '�C.k �- U'�, �. _ ,� ,\ RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS �Q '53QQ ^1 '�� 17 C �:S f r Y✓ Com=;-i r C^lc c CT /00 ' 2 .Z l3. Q �� %' ff t 5/2 79:5- LlI�3� �D 1- 131 �re� �r- n, h a 5 d``�,�E z 54 <r *31 3 - ) f 6.1 Y I r TCA H t=-x5-r- wc t Q-4 473889 53 . -5 - 12 . 6 OWNER: SHORES INC BREEZY NUMBER# DATE TYPE CO # USE/DESCRIPTION 23440 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 - 23441 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE - #7 - 23442 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 - 23443 5/15/96 PERMIT - REPAIR CTG #12 Tillable T Woodland 23444 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #4 - Meadowland 23623 8/08/96 PERMIT REPAIR EXISTING SEASONAL COTTA- House Plot BULKHEAD Total -t+444-,7H '7 7 7 T 7'' /�2k TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD k VI-LLAGE DIST SUB LOT OWNER STREET Z!71 ACR. REMARKS Al TYPE OF BLD. -7 PROP CLQ SS VZ S7E 7Z) 7 S;- LAND IMP TOTAL DATE A"Z, be- —7/ IS7 re )acf R P* -R -7 No rt�ploce-s 7 Q 9_ r(f p)ace�5, e% oi//5/c)s- 8P4,4 -3)1-/Y7 repicuu ,/repo-ir, #2_01 1011� jb6 flP S-L�2-4 VCVIQCC� sict-q-7 ()nj+ # 2e c 1/9,( Ila 12,3 !6-1 ai- kg* r- 0 7 110-7 r 6,f �-33 S-0-� . - - — (4=.f ist DEPTH rc)g S-bye - C'6—lr�C MEADOWLAND )g) .-- BULKHEAD 'R i3j�4 (L5 f " CI-M*. E/-+R h cot-to'l, V Icc SCTnA # DLL I f C a+e— f ti- f TOWN ®F SOUTH LD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET � Sy-9Q VILLAGE DIST. SUB LOT 4`r '!'xi(+-» CU 11`^res'l i'/ 1_@",c MC�In lb r / ACR. �w . , REMARKS 16 , ) See U�-��' C• e c _ TYPE OF BLD. jj )Qq 60 3q--7q3 e rn b o-� 3 kaV 5 be--d is r- PROP. CLASS # II p 1 r- } �f L �L�Y�}r'Y�`_,r,r) °7 J� 2 0 7r ��' H95 o 1)] LI r c Q� LAND IMP TOTAL DATE r D 7 �ID �� 359 - I� ° CG4 10, bC�r) o QST �„ € z •� 0D3 olyOJ / o ' 3S 9 9 �� ✓ t"s FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL ^'aR ± a7i"cM a irddif'1 J�1 c 3 ah i" OWNER ,; Efi"° yC 's .57`REET 1� , ��" i '¢�'(d{b! SUB Ti•�t..: 't _ ; +:ct•c,•td1�46a '3fii'7 ..1i +: fy. t."-'-c i' +'+'�S •! li ! c '.Y.,t y�' r r," t9 , k ° vl�r tSL - l {'J •. 't-t:+a,. + � - u I i ,f� 1 j f � ��f"� ,� t.•. ,f•, �` i.���•t�-: }!,{t S �YLf„''>e i r, _ h�1„.+1 'f f��'�,' - I I c FORMER OWNER N ACR. S , W TYPE OF BUILDING y RES. SEAS VL. FARMCOMM. CB. MISC. MI<t, Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS ' L521 TtZ t AGE BUILDING CONDITION „ C� �� I — 's, O NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre `7�G C l`r� C, C c', 0i el-, U C illable 1 f f L 1%!i illable 2 A) P, illable 3 /oodlond Nampland - FRONTAGE ON WATER f0 rushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD ouse Plot DEPTH - BULKHEAD `- h?, l,;, rAo �0 0 r (!]p � S�, c:a 7 > )tal DOCK �O v AF r e•�y COLOR "FRIM r —— 7 3 rr � i i 7 - , M. Bldg. J V L� �� "O �` Bath Dinette Foundation c SS A Ly / 42— no 5 It Floors w e�' e h a u V c{ K. Extension, r, Basement / '� � Ext. Walls Interior Finish r LR Extensib' r :' ✓ cr n / a a -60 a (2 c( rl� -- Fire Place ( Heat DR. Extension ' � '�` __ � _ � � ;.. ' � � o t %� --- Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR PorchC� cI L! recreation Roo Rooms 2nd FloorFIN B. — — -- t (. A- J �- Porch ! A I Lf Dormer Breezeway r O� I w„ , <� Driveway - Garage V Patio ;'G ,� l = Y9-V � 0 — 0. B. Tata I = 13 X / 0 a d 4 7 OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB- LOT Z FORMER OWNER N E ACR. S W TYPE OF BUILDING '14 Pe C 0 C :ES. SEAS. �17 VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 2 -2,;' 2 �3 0X c-o 1171_3 0,f) ir" IJf /7� --') 3 b 3 9, 00 EkZ-' -2-0 t2 1�'p ojG C�- ;� r.��l CSI �,�V�C`�(�C.�,`�S�Gr�4�(�� �C=I-�r`)�-d'2_ l_ -`�c��1'� ����5�% -3 3� AGE BUILDING CONDITION 6, 15-14 1 r r C y C- \,IEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVEE3,::i ( .4 L Fie— ::ARM Acre Value Per Value Acre 10. -5j'n1;4- k n'8-3 illable FRONTAGE ON WATER /oodland FRONTAGE ON ROAD *dowlond DEPTH ouse Plot BULKHEAD DOCK oto I ......... Z13NAAO Maw 3 22=1 1911 AT -Z-011M.-1;1.,-1 In COLOR TRIM ———————— —— dension I (tension 4 3 Fr ,tension Foundation Both — I I Dinette rch Basement Floors 11<j rch J-j 7 Ext Walls Interior Finish LR. eezeway Fire Place Heat DR. rage ho Type Roof Rooms I st Floor BR, Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B B. Dar er Driveway Q r C. A a& &) (�-) 0 7-70 V N E R EETP VILLAGE DIST, SUB. LOT n