The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-298 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT ~ 298 This Wetlands Permit ........................has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No.....,3,8..1, ........... filed - - ~ John Weismantle for ,L.. I I,. Dy Applicant ............................ ; .............. · ...C.:,0..: ............................... on ,.~.a, 7....,2.9. ................ 19....8..6.... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given, - Approval to bury, trench and backfill to install Permit granted to do the following WOrK ................................................................................................. 69KV electric cable conduits at submarine crossing from Island View L,a. ne (Southold) to Rocky Shore (Shelter Island). Location of property on which work to be done ...... .I..s..1.,a..n..d...y...i..e..w...,L.~.n..e. ............................................... Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ................................................................................................. Size of work: Length ............................................................................................................................. Width Height Above High Water ............................................................................................. Depth Below Low Water ................................................................................................. ~Y_ards to be Excavated ..................................................................................................... Yards to be Filled ......................................................................................................... Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ......................................................................... Intended use of property ......................................................................................................................... Conditions if any .............................................................................................................................. Expiration Date .~'D'.e.~c''e~.m~b"e'~r~".~.~`.'~`~8.'9."~..~};~.~m..~...c~G~"~..~'~¢"¢¢~¢ .................... Number of Inspections Required ~2'~T..r..u'`s~?~e'~e~s.~.~a~.r`~e.~.~t~.°~.~.e..'G~°.~t~.i..f~$.~e.d..~p'~g~p~z¢~¢~.~£`'~¢ .... work. Inspection Fees ....... ~.5..: .0...0.. _p.a..i..d. ................................................................................................. Liability Policies in the Amount of ......................................................................................................... The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the even~ that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here* under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other approval when required shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon recej3t by the Trustees. of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. TRUSI~ES ~hn M. Bredemeyer. 1II. President / Henry P~ Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kmpski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARMS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O_ Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax ~516) 765~1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 23, 1990 Maurice P. Fitzgerald Manager, Permit Division Long Island Lighting Co. 1660 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 RE: Wetlands Permit ~298 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board Trustees on Thursday, March 22, 1990: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees extend Permit ~298 from December 31, 1989 to March 9, 1993. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $115.00, which represents the difference of the wetlands application fee of $150.00 which you paid and the renewal fee of $35. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ve/~ truly yours, ~>~n M. Breden%eyer, Iit )Jresident, Board of Trustees JMB: jet ei1c. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 10 3 5 BOARD OF TOWN ~TRUSTEE9 ~ MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 PAY TOTHE Long Island Lighting Company ORDER OF March 26, One Hundred fifteen dollars .................................................... 1990 $ 115.00 DOLLARS FOR NORSTAR BANK Refund ii'D0 ~O 5 5,' ~:O 8 ~hOhhh5~: BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 IELEPHONq~ f516~ 765-1892 Long Island L&ghting Co. PHON£ NO .... 1660 Wal% Whitman Road M~l~ille, NY 11747 TAX MAP NO. 1000--057--02 --N/A (Public Street) A.~ENT~._~O~I~__~A~ We_ls__Ig~ll_t_l_e_/ ViP. (516) 420-613'0 PHONS NO. PERMIT REQUESTED TO Trench, ~bury and backfill to install 69KV electric cable conduits at submarine crossing. (Southold) to Rocky Shore Road (Shelter Island). N/A CREEK, SIZE OF BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Conklinq Point - Crescent Beach PROPOSED WORK Approximately 13,600 sq. ft. (~otal crossing_). 3400' (total 1 enoch_ _o f_ _c~_~_s s_inq_) approxima%ely 4' DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER RancLe_s- from 0' at shoreline to -85' YARDS TO SE EXCAVATED_ app_r, ox_.__2_0_00__yds. (total c~_oss_l_n_g_)_ YARDS TO SE FILLED___approx. 2000~¥ds. (backfill trench with excavated r~aterial] WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR SAY FRONTING PROPERTY 3400' DEPTH AT LOW TIDE 0'--85' AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2.3' DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL NA Residential IN T~E AREA IkTA FT. MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL SE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED Probably__either _j_e_%t_i_n_~ and/or clam shell dredge INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY improve reliability of electric service DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE Previous cable lai~ between Conkling Point & Crescent Beach about 20'years ago. AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITe HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FiLL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED B~ A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY None known DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY APPL I CANT. Pligh~y work permit to be issued by To~n. ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN NA PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? YOUR DEED THAT WOULD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHORT E:NVIRON~ENTAL ASSKSS~ENT FORM Project Informstion [To be completed by Applicant or Pro]ect sponsor) 1. ~,~plicanrjsDonsor I 2. Project Hame Lon~ Island Li~h~inq do. I Buell to Southold Underground Cable System 3. P~oie¢: ~ocation:. Southold, Shelter Island, Southampton, North Haven Sag Harbor, East Municin~uw Hampton Cousin Suffolk g New [] £xoansion [] Modification/alteration 5 Describe proiect briefly: Installation of 69kV pipe-type cable system (underground) from Southold to Buell Substations, making 3 submarine crossings. The route follows existing roads. (See attached Project_ Su~rary for additional details). See attached Project Srm~nary [] Yes [] No If No. describe briefly [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commerc,a[ [] A~ncukure [] Pa. rkian~/open space [] Other [] Yes [] NO if yes, list a~genc~(s} and permit/approvals Corps of ~S Dept. of En~ro~ntal Cons~ation - Wetlands ~ Yes ~ No If yes. Jist agency name and permi~approvaJ type John A. Weismantle, V.P. PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agency) C6. Seconc~ar~. curnulatwe or other effects not identified in C1-C67 Explain briefly. C7. A change =- use of either quantity or type of energy? E×oJain briefly. PART Ill Determination of Significance (To be corr ~leted by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its ia) setting {i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; {dj JrreversibHitv; (e) geographic sco~e; and if) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference sb ~porting ma[erials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show.that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adeouateJv aodressed. [] Check this box if you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL LONG FORM EAF and]or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and ahab sis above and Any supporting documentation. that the proposed actior WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, [he reasons supportng this determination: COUNTY OF SUPFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ]SS: John A. Weismantle BEIN~ DULY SWORN DEPOSES N~{TU~E OF APPL I CANT SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS NOTARY UBL? EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED DIBAPPROVED CONDITIONS, "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPT£R 97) "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT IF ANY (CHAPTER 32) EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Purpose and Necessity 3.0 Loca%ion of Project 4.0 Project Design 5.0 Construction Program 6.0 Key Environmental Factors 6.1 Cable Fluid 6.2 Aquatic and Land Use Features 6.2.1 Aquatic Crossings 6.2.2 Land Use 7.0 Alternatives 7.1 Overhead Transmission 7.2 Solid Dielectric Underground Cable 8.0 Summary and Conclusion 9.0 Appendices Appendix A - Route Map Appendix B - References Appendix C - List of Agencies Receiving Project Summary/Environmental Permits Required Page 1 1 2 3 3 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 1.0 Introduction This Project Summary Report for the installation of the Buell-Southold underground pipe-type cable system has been prepared in support of applications for the various environmental permits necessary for the construction and implementation of the proposed project. Because the cable is designed to operate at 69kV (69 thousand volts) it is not sub3ectto regulations stemmzng from Artzcle V I of New York State Public Servzce Law; those regulations have a 100kV threshold. 2.0 Purp6se and Necessity The Long Island Lighting Company is proposing to build a 69kV transmission line from Southold to East Hampton in order to meet the existing electric load and to increase the reliability of the electric system on the eastern end of Lomg Island, as this load continues to grow. Average system load growth has been 1-2% over the last few years. However, east end electric load growth of 7% annually during the past five years has severely strained the ability of the existing transmission system to supply the area'S peak loads, particularly in the Town of East Hampton. LILCO has compensated for this load growth to the maximum degree possible by running expensive distillate oil-fired peaking generation at Buell (East Hampton) and Montauk for extended periods. Nevertheless, during hours of heavy electric use on about 60 days during the year, a single line outage on the 69kV supply between LILCO's Tiana and Buell Substations could result in line damage on the remaining circuit and a local blackout of significant duration. Delays in implementing improvements for the area will compound the existing operating problems because the experienced load growth rate is expected to continue for at least the next few years. Actual construction is scheduled to begin in February 1987 following completion of preliminary engineering and procurement, which have been initiated. The projected completion date is April 1989 in order for the system to be available to help meet the peak summer electrical loads. 3.0 Location of Project The proposed underground transmission line between Buell Substation in East Hampton and Southold Substation near Greenport runs generally north and south and follows state Route 114 for most of the route (See Appendix A for ~oute Maps). The total approximate length of this cable will be sixteen and a half miles, including three submarine crossings. Beginning from Buell Substation, the cable heads northwest on Route 114 approximately four and a half miles to the Village.of Sag.HarBor. In th? village, the route bypasses the business district by heading north on Hempstead ~treet and north again on Bay Street to the first submarine c~ossing at Sag H~rbor Cove. The diatanc? within the village is approxlm~tely one and a half miles. Following the 800 foot ~ubmarine crossing east of the bridge, the cable continues north on Route 114, here known as Ferry Road, through North Haven, a distance of three miles, to the terminal for the south ferry to Shelter Island. A 2,000 foot submarine crossing of Shelter Island Sound, east of the south ferry route, brings the cable to Shelter Island. On the islandq the cable continues to follow Route 114 north to the intersection of Ferry Road and Ram Head Road. While RoDte 114 turns west, the cable continues north on Ram Island Road, also known as St. Mary's Road, until the third intersection where it, too, turns west, onto Manwaring Road. The cable heads west on this road, which changes names from Manwaring Road to Ferry Road, to Crescent Beach and the final submarine crossing. The disltance on Shelter Island is four and a third miles. This third crossing, from Crescent Beach, Shelter Island to Conkling Point, Southold, is 3,400 feet long and generally parallels the route of the existing distribution cable crossing. The cable comes ashore at Island View Lane and immediatel~ turns north onto Bay Shore ROad which continues onto Kerwin Boulevard, passing under the LIRR street level crossing, to Route 25. This distance is approximately a mile and a half. On Route 25 the cable heads east approximately a quarter mile to the Southold Substation just west of Chapel Lane. 4.0 Project Design The proposed underground transmission cable between Buell and Southold will be 1500 kmil, 69 kV standard pzpe-type cable. On land, the system will consist of three single conductor cables in one 6 5/8" diameter by 1/4" wall steel pipe coated for cathodic protection. Two pipes (one a spare) With 1 1/2" thick concrete coatings will be installed at the submarine crossings. Spare pipe has been ~clnded in the submarine sections of the route to expedite restoration in the event of a failure at one of the three cable crossings. On land, the pipe will be buried with about 3 feet.of cover. At the ~ubmarine.crossings, the pipe will be ~buried at a depth of approximately 5 feet. ~a~holes Will be spaced abo~t 3,000 - 4i000'ap~rt, a · ' ~ t ' h distance dzcta ed by the reel sz. ze t at can be accommodated b.y available cable reel trailers and by the permissible cable pulling tensions. The cable's pipe will be filled with insulating fluid at a nominal pressure of 200 psi, maintained by a pumping plant with a reservoir at each end of the circuit in the substations. Leaks in such installations are extremely rare and the use of an environmentally benign insulating fluid will ensure a minimal environmental impact should a ~gnzflcant leak occur. (Se? S~ctzon 6.1 for addztzona i~formation on the characte~zsties of the proposed fluids.) LILCO~s construction forces have installed several similar transmission lines on land and three domestic manufacturers are capaSle of supplying the cable. The submarin~ crossing conduits will be installed by a marine contractor. 5.0 Construction Program Construction is accomplished in four sequential phases: o Manhole and Pipe Installation (Land and Marine) o Cable Pulling o Splicing o Filling Line with Insulating Fluid Manholes and pipe installation on the land sections will be in conformance with all permit requirements and generally accepted installation practices. Typical installation practice would involve such construction equipment as backhoes, truck mounted cranes, hydraulic cranes, front end loaders, dump and flat bodied trucks to install the pipe in a nominal 3 foot wide by 4 foot deep trench generally located in the shoulder area of the roads - 3 - along the route. Work will be progressed in a safe and expeditious manner with regard to traffic control and safety to the general public and scheduled so as to avoid the peak traffic periods associated with summer recreation. Work period for this portion of the project is expected to span I2 to 15 months. Marine installation of the cable will involve pre-excavation of a nominal 5 foot deep trench along the bottom of each water crossing on the route by clamshell or drag line bucket, operated from a crane mounted on a barge. Excavated material will be sidecast for later use as back fill over the cable. Pipe may be installed from a lay barge or pre-staged on shgre and floated or pulled across Jo the oPposite shore into the prepared trench. ~fte~ pipe installation, backfilling wit~ ba accomplished in similar fashion to excavation. The sidecast materials will be used to restore the trench to the original bottom co,tour. A final decision on specific methods of marine installation will be dependent on preference Of the ~ssful b~idd~ng contractor. Marine work will conform to requirements and all U.S. Coast Guard be progressed in a mannear to minimize and recreational activity in the It is estimated that the ~arine portion of 1Rtion will have a duration of 9 to 12 C~b~e pulling will be accomplished by positioning a reel trailer at one manhole and setting up a winch at an adjacent manhole about 3,000 feet away. Although each pull d~ration is expected to be one day, a three month window is allo~ed in the project's schedule to cover inclement weather and set up time for each pull (about 30 in all). After the cables are pulled, splicing proceeds in each manhole to connect adjacent cable sections. Splicing is a continuous around-the-clock operation spanning three days per splice. It requires a trailer outfitted with tools and equipment to be positioned over each manhole to support the splice crews in this operation. All splicing is expected to be completed in 10 to 12 weeks following cable pulling. Cable filling with insulating fluid generally requires four or five days of continuous activity, mostly concentrated at the cable terminals and several manhole locations along the route. Both the splicing and filling operation are planned to minimize impact on the lifestyle of the residents and traffic conditions and to insure general safety of the public. 6.0 Key Environmental Factors 6.1 Cable Insulating Fluids The cable insulating fluid for the proposed Buell Southold Project is specified to be either Low Viscosity Polybutene (LVP), or Dichevrol 100 (DO 100). Both have undergone bioassay testing and have been found to be environmentally safe. LVP is a colorless, odorless liquid with a slightly oily feel. It is relativeIy insoluble in water, has low vapor pressure, and a quite-high flash point of 265°F. LVP is classified as a Class IIIB combustible liquid under' the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration ~nd by the National Fire Protection Association, and zs excl~dedfrom special handling and storage requirements of lower flaah point combustible and flan~able liquids. LYP has undergone extensive environmental assessment by Federal and New York State regulatory agencies and was approved for use in the Dunwoodie-Glenwood underground- underwater transmission line. (See Appendix B, References.) Toxicity tests conducted on several.animal species have indicated that LVP produces n6 discernible effects on t~ese organisms ~hen the material is ingested. LVP zs biodegradable in the aquatic environment; therefore, in the unlikely event o~ a pipe leak, there would be no long term serious degradation of environmental quality. None of the detarious effects of residues generally associated with spills of petroleum products would be found, as LVP is very similar to clean mineral oil. The absence of animal toxicity, combined with the compound's known chemical identity and purity, permit the conclusion that LVP is as safe as ordinary white mineral oil, which it closely resembles. It is approved by the Food a~d Drug Administration for use as a lubricant in food processing machines. Dichevrol 100 (DO 100), a branched alkylbenzene, is similar ~n many properties to LVP. DO 100 is a water white, vzscous liquid with an oily feel. It is insoluble in water, has a low vapor pressure and a somewhat higher flash point of 310°F. Like LVP, DO 100 has exhibited no animal toxicitY in bioassays with aquatic organisms. It, too, should be as safe as ordinary white mineral oil, which it also resembles. -5 ~ The selection of either LVP or DO 100 as the cable fluid of choice will depend on availability and cost when the purchase is made. 6.2 Aquatic and Land Use Features 6.2.1 Aquatic Crossings The proposed cable route makes three submarine crossings which total about 6,200 feet in length. The southern crossing, Sag Harbor Cove, is an 800 foot run across Sag Harbor Cove on the northeast side of the existing bridge. The maximum water depth is approximately 12' (MLW). The bottom is largely coarse sand with occasional isolated pockets of finer sands along with smaller amounts of silt and clay. Percent composition of the three fractions average: sand - 90%~ silt - 5%; clay 5%. Grab samples taken in January 1986 indicated isolated patches of heavy concentrations of empty shell debris. Live organisms are limited to a few mud crabs, chitons, starfish, slipper shells, near nut shells and anemones. No concentrations of clams, oysters or scallops were found. Tidal currents are estimated at about ] 1/2 knots at strength of tide. Shorelines on both sides 6f the crossing are sandy beaches or rip-rapped bridge structures. The only wetlands vegetation present as a small stand of Spartina alterniflora whieh is located at the southeaft corner-of the bridge. It will be bypassed by the proposed crossing route. The middle crossing, between North Haven Peninsula and Shelter Island, is a 2,000 foot run proposed to be located along a line approximately 100 feet to the east of the South Ferry Company's terminals. Maximum water depths of approximately 42 feet occupy the center one-third of the crossing. Currents are quite strong, running at better than 2~ knots at strength of tide, preventing the accumulation of fine sediments or dense organism communities. The bottom is composed of coarse materials whose nature required sampling by dredge rather than by grab. Samples showed as much as 90 percent of the bottom to be stones up to 6 inches in diameter. Smaller fractions were found in the - 6 - 6.2.2 proportions: sand - 89.9%, silt - 7.2%, clay 2.8%. Live organisms, found in very low densities, were limited to a few slipper shells and paper spoon shells. No commercial shellfish were found. Both landfalls are across sandy beaches with no wetland vegetation present. The north crossing runs 3,400 feet from Crescent Beach on Shelter Island to Conkling Point in Southold. It follows an existing submarine cable crossing route which is indicate.d on NOS navigation chart No. 12358. mMaXimum depths are approximately 85 f.eet at the iddie and southern part of the crossing, shalloWing to about ~0 feet and less at the northern end. As with the middle crossing, currents rUn at better 'than 2~ knots, and the bottom is compos~ed of coarse materials domi~.ated by stohes (aboUt 50%).. Finer mateCiats, {~here present, are.in the prOPortions: san~ - 84.3~, silt - 9.5%, clay ~.3~. The benthic community at this crossing was a bit more diverse and populous than at the otb r two, hut was st~ll l~m~ted by h~gh currents and har<d substrate. Organisms found in .greatest abundance were slipper shells, near nut Shal!s and mud crabs. Land Use The proposed transmission line will be located entirely underground, either within existing roadways or along the shoulder of these roads. There will be no visible, above ground structures with the exception of the two oil pumping stations and reservoirs which will be located entirely within the electric substations. There are both mapped and unmapped freshwater wetlands adjacent to some of the roadway used as the cable route. The location of the cable within the roadway or shoulder will avoid any impact on these wetlands. - 7 - 7.0 Alternatives 7.1 Overhead Transmission An overhead transmission line has been ruled out because the Town of Shelter Island and the Village of North Haven have ordinances which prohibit new overhead electric transmission construction. In addition, in response to the Company's inquiry, the Towns of East Hamptgn and Southampton, and the Village of S~g Harbor'have informed the Company that they are opposed to overhead construction for this line. 7.2 Solid Dielectric Underground Cable The Company has conducted an engineering and economic analysis of solid dielectric vs. pipe-type cable. That analysis s~owed a.very small economic advantage for the solid dielectrzc cable that was easily outweighed by the superior reliability of the pipe-type cable. Environmentally, the construction of the pipe-type cable involves considerably less disturbance because of the smaller (wzdth) trench required for installation. In rearms of operational environmental impacts, the only difference is the small potential for a leak of the dielectric fluid from the pipe-type cable. This is mitigated by the choice of insulating fluids, which are considered "environmentally safe" on the basis of extensive environmental assessment including animal toxicity tests. 8.0 Summary and Conclusion In order to increase the reliability of electric service to Long Island's east end, the Long Island Lighting Company proposes to construct a 69kV underground transmission line to connect the Southold Substation on the north fork with the Buell Substation in East Hampton on the south fork. The 16-1/2 mile long route, which includes three submarine crossings, follows existing roads and highways. It will be buried along its entire length, including the submarine crossings. The line will be a standard steel walled, pipe-type cable filled with an insulating fluid selected for its environmental compatibility. Construction is proposed for the period February 1987 to March 1989, but only a short length of roadway will be open at any one time. Work will be scheduled to avoid disruption of land and boat traffic during peak summer travel periods. Once completed, the project will have no visual impact. Potential for environmental impact during construction is minimal because the line will be buried within existing roadways or along their shoulders, thereby avoiding several adjacent freshwater and tidal wetlands. Impacts at the water crossings will likewise be minimal because of the absence of vulnerable tidal wetlands at the crossing landfa~ls, and minimal benthic populations or commercial shellfish along the proposed routes. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation guidelines for determining compatibility of projects with wetlands, find ~hat~installation 9f underground electric utilities l~volving restoration of existing g~ound elevations is generally compatible, and a permit is required. The.nature of this project witl not substantially alter or impair na:tural conditions or functions of any tidal Wetlands. The project is fully consistent with the policies of New York's ~oastal Zone Management Plan and proposed waterfront revitalization plans of several local agenc{es. Ail municipalities along the route and all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction are being notified of th? project. A list of these agencies is included in Appendix C. APPENDIX A Route Maps N LOIV6 /,~tAAID L/GJlT/IVG. CO P~ OPOSEO ',~ UL~MAI~IiV£ CONDUITS NmW YO~K ~OPOSEO APPENDIX B REFERENCES .Alexander, J.E., 1973. A Study of the Solubility of LVP in Seawater. Prepared for the Long Island Lighting Company. New York Ocean Science Laboratory. Montauk, New York Biospherics Inc. 1984. The Acute Toxicity of Dichevrol 100 to Rainbow Trout (Salmo 8airdneri). Prepared for Chevron--~ironmental Health Care center, Inc. Richmond, California Biospherics Inc. 1984. The Acute Toxicity of Dichevrol 100 to Sheepshead Minnow (CTprinodon variegatus). Prepared for Chevron Environmental Health Care Center, Inc. Richmond, California Cosden Oil and Chemical Company, 1986. Cosden Polyvis Polybutenes, Technical Bulletin, Number 43, Windsor, New Jersey Food and Drug Research Laboratories, 1986. Feeding Studies with Polyvis SH on Rats and Dogs. Submitted to Cosden Oil and Chemical Company. Maspeth~ New York Leibovitz, L, 1972. Toxicity Studies of Low Viscosity Polybutene (LVP) in %~ite Pekin Ducks. Cornell University Duck Research Laboratory. Eastport, L.I., New York Quirk, Lawler and Matusky Engineers, 1972. Analysis of Possible Toxic Effects of Low Viscosity Polybutene (LVP) on Fundulus heteroclitus and Artemia saline. Army Engineer District, 1975. Final Environmental Statement: Proposed Con Edison - Long Island Lighting Company's Power Transmission Cable, New York, New York. (Dunwoodie Glenwood). APPENDIX C AGENCIES RECEIVING PROJECT SUMMARY/ENVIROnmENTAL PERMITS REqU~RE~ U. S. Army Corps of Engineers - Permit Required New York State Department of Environmental Conservation - Wetlands and Dewatering Permits Required New York State Department of State - Statement of Consistency with Coastal Management Plan Required. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Permit required under Article 12 of Sanitary (Oil Pumping Stations) Code Town of Southold - Wetlands Permit Required Town of Shelter Island - No Environmental Permit Required Town of East Hampton - No Environmental Permit Required Town of Southampton - No Environmental Permit Required Village of North Haven - No Environmental Permit Required Village of Sag Harbor - No Environmental Permit Required