The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOki-Do, Ltd OOSVFF�(�C Town Hall Albert J.Krupski,President James King,Vice-Presidentti ��j•J► 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster p P.O.Box 1179 CA = Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda %�s • Peggy A.Dickerson Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees DATE: March 31, 2004 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Oki-Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#38-7-7.1 With regard to the above-referenced, after a preliminary review of the site plan and an on-site inspection, the Board of Trustees will require the proposed bulkhead be installed behind the rock gabion wall, not in front of. Furthermore, any activity within 100' of the wetland line or seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area will require permits from -this office. Should you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. Thank you. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE .� �/ Chair c �� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 CA Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO v, Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. DS MARTIN EDW R ��• `1►�O� MEMORANDUM C PLANNING BOARD OF --- -- Date: March 23, 2004 TOWN OF SOUTHOL IL J i ILS To: Agency Referral Request *Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town *Southold Town Building Department Bard ai Trustees *Southold Town Board *Southold Town Board of Trustees *Southold Town Engineer *Suffolk County Department of Health Services *NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority *Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site P[En Reviewer ] Re: Proposed Site Plan for OkJ-Do E C V 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion D SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 MAR 2 3 2004 Dear Reviewer: Southold Town ' Status: New Active Site Plan. Required Return Date_: Board of Trustees The above listed action and site plan is referred to your agency for review, comments, concerns, permits requirements and jurisdiction. This proposed site plan is for build out as follows;new 27 room SPA/ hotel/restaurant with 40,468 sq.ft., center building with 4,341.5 sq.ft., 40 units of sleeping rooms in 9 buildings with 19,206 sq.ft.,36 unit sleeping rooms in 12 building's with 25,608 sq.ft., managers residence with 2,900 sq.ft., caretakers residence with 1,450 sq.ft.,gate house with 1,060 sq.ft., pool house with 1,060 sq.ft., maintenance bldg. with 1,900 sq.ft.,mechanical equipment bldg. with 1,430 sq.ft., and pool on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located at approximately south east end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-38.-7-7.1 Please respond on your agencies position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File *Maps are enclosed for your review, 1 0 Y 40 N I I 0Nq[jSjjj e w o 1 d % 4 , - - - ..-.,- ,....,�..y..r^•. - ^-r-•�^^'-•^-�^_'-'—._"-'^ ,....,. ....�,..:...r,-»...a r•. "t' . ••...e..!'v+a f.-....i.•�.yew�-y,.x..y„�*•�,-. ..y,.,., /�� '. � - � �': - .-. _. ._,..yt a.�..3t-r .N..,,.. ...osr-..m�,•r_'ar'w-�,.�,;: ,.:..•�-.... f w..,' 1^�t.- � 1 � 1 1 1 ,�� . - � .7 D"i .:R...-.r�+'r •_ +�'�E�.rs' ^'q'�'w.'..I. 'Y,.;tb M`� 1 ♦ � ' �� ' - . - - ` ..o:.•""..ws''""'., �a„A,,,' .,: '"• �f sem, _�;.,5.•.-• _ '� ,. :.r'.. . 'N" r � .. l 1 � r ' �� ^ ,,,..A""- ""`?'„�,,,�+'},�..w^.ar"r� '�,". .p"� .� '" .,•.: .j�I,�y„Arj�'9er �� .. .._'• ., •�• M fv .t "^�' - ). xn_m �a - 'v'.4*,,,,,.3 ry r,;,n,:r.,.s i .Y k-..=�_pr•-..#� - ., t'"^"' ` ` 1 / , Z_•�'/I GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE t SHIPYARD LANE SOUTHOLD TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY ; Butte Otruba — O ' Connor E C E o Architects , AIA VAR 1 7 M4 Southold TOM ,PlanningBoarr+ 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 k `_ (516)625-6625 FAX (516) .625-6629 , ZaWcn paw, www ` - - _ WWli2 wQli. �J WCL QUzi— JW CL'm��ly - _ - _ QF—Z �ZW_ct QC) w� dw > �� V)x�i' =O> to �z - O v, Z!w�7� Q J. LL_< 1�N�0 C) YOZ®�N7(Ys gorz?-c) ap�o�z``'Lcy� � W-Xw-w' <0"o-j-00 }- Q-�-= r ci�'Q a w z z w�-wC> Z J 0Z O I -Qda C) czZME;C)O ' W TONE DR- - GILLETTE DRIVE Lot 4 Subdvision - p Of 'Marion Manor' olk County Fite No. 2038 R ` O Lot 6 Lot 10 Lot 9 Lot 8 Lot 7 Fye Lot 5 � c REQUIRED PAR INC \'yam a FOR 3 RE5IDEN E5 Q= or JETTY m r,. S T22WE + + + + + + + + O, + Z + • _ + + + _ 7 F Nj + + + SACS + + + + + + °' + + _ + + + P� �E \ \ � 1 X11 '/ \ \\�� + W co TIE LINE ALONG W + APPROX. + HIGH WATER LINE + = \-EX15TIN6 LANpSGAPING ! ` W ( 4 0,(j TO REMAIN '� V z 3 + U I I o �� + + O + �, ✓t _ __ GARDINERS BAY z Cn W _\ J z o GRAVEL ROADWAY E 2 I + \i -o V— Q C 72CT82. W_ I I �lj + s a ca J' a o /%�� WETL D _ss1 k HIGH WATER MARIA C l/��. "JN \ 1Y�f� dt piV 90 + + /� '/t` �g WOOD BULKHEAD � Q I + + c° —---- W + + �* - LANDWARD LIMIT OF 88eW22'E a ,ss' - e9n WETLANDS A5 FLAGGED BY TIE LINE r< 0 T j + 25'-m' JEFFREY L. 5EEMAN, R.E.M. OF t�� N3WW5rW T Z �i SIDE YA = -' + �W COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL neo' p N a,v 3' - + O d w CORPORATION ON AUG. 12, t;i z z Q si=rsacK =_ + MA -MADE '� _ � 2003 '"' ,� o al LLJ J o + CID + KE ` ; WOOD BUL N `t v I I 3 cn o O C / Cly I + + + '/ %%' W L HEAD DREDGED BASINLU ,,;''"/i AREA- 60,381.86 SO.Ff. ;a -� Z GARDEN WALL OR L3862 ACRES ..r V d t GAS PUMP TO TIE LINE "j o + -DOCK $ N '' `� I t = o BULKHEAD WOOD `� "� �,\\� hKl65e'24'VV + + SITE PLAN KEY %%'i:! , SYMBOL BU►LD'NG NAME BUILDING DESCR'I'T10N ,`tGG �6'p BUII DING ONE SPA/HOTEL/ RESTAURANT / F �,; ,� l j�, ";,,,/1;;;; „�•.a. �. \' 1 J to ►l' + . i BUILDING TWO CENTER BUILDING tL HEDGE ON ; / ,:,,-,, ;-/ 1c u' PROPER %N�' /"li., rV PROP v ' 47- '`SCI BUII�INlG THREE A FIVE UNITS SLEEPING ROOM LINE .�k. .,/ / / .l, 'f, .,,, O i% {i' %; /' l/,:'r/i.,,,, !/;.',,;+', ,,�,'/>' ,LSI ,jy, V• ,(7; `'-;i` $ BUILDING THREE 8 T E UMTS SLEEPING ROOM n gEdi HEDGE Y 05 ACES % /,i:� BUILDING FOUR MANAGER'S RESIDENCE }n •" ' Y'- / '�%/i', r,' BtAt�ING FIVE CARETAKER'S RESCENCE q/ t Y (O j/i,�l BUILDING SIX GATE HOUSE ] . _. 2m� _ „ - �/y�' /yam+ O i -m X _ '4"'�"r'4r,',',-%%%�/ /�/ � ' t 7 --Lm_JD POOL HOUSE Z x (LAND S ES N��'%M�✓,✓��'�,5y' �Ra � , 'A'c 1 BLrtL.DING SEVEN ` '; BUILDING EKV iT MAINTENANCE ^ BLF' ER FROM 8 - �Y RES.DISTRICT) , , s . - ----- C� o % x % X lP ES X P ES A 'S I Z P E X P .Es a l a 3 a A s % 1 _ BUILD ml MME MECHAMCAL BUILDING u o 1111 HEDGE 9 GARDEN WALL ° s �T].,;�Lj P ES P Es-A L I I P .Es P ,EsEa I T P ,Es let I>,VN,_A5PHALT PARKING AREA --SHIPYARD ----L-ANE-^ ��RDEr�_r�ALL_—a ._ '� ►+` 1 v^l ---- - - -- --.'_—�- 3 L� — \ HIGH WATER MARK O LLJ o d a L -- O — cq ROCK ` ® •r-1 m Ln C BENCH MARK W L GUIDE RAIL � s �iL O ENGH MARK NAIL SET IN POLE Q �- U o ELEV. = 20.00 ' � _ �Il NAIL 5ET IN POLE � z � ELEV. _ -1.00 SH N SITE PLAN 1 SCALE: V = 6m'-m' DRAWING NO.: 1 .0 F ' G Qd�Z -pZoa mzo� wo �a� v www jQiL�3�wwQ BUILDING ANALYSIS SITE ZONING + BUILDING CODE. DATA Q °y. _j Z_ I-_°y ` WF-Z� QZ~W°��+ Q1 NN�mU z0zm�in-'' c BUILDING AREA BUILDING COVERAGE oYn R oKrpo L� - g o Q Z `,'_ z _ BU'LDlNG NAME ' OUANTITY STORIES HEIGHT PER FLOOR TOTAL PER BUILDING SITE TOTAL 20 WEST 64th STREET* 24E 0,5r67z- z m t � �,�=mow "O� of NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10023 ci W IN a o Z w a O z o``' L?_1 SPA/HOTEL/RESTAURANT 1 2 1ST 24, 153.5 W� m w Z W 2ND 1fi 314.5 40, 468.0 35, 231 35, 231 ARCHITECT BUTT.OTRUBA-O'CONNOR ARCHITECTS �w U J Z J u o Q Q o z z - " 1062 NORTHERN BOULEVARD ?a Q ov Q>a C zz�u o CENTER BUILDING 1 1 32'-0' 3, 065 3, 065 4, 341.5 4, 341.5 RosLYN, NY 1157s ` 2 30,_0. 1ST 1, 260 2, 100.0 2, 134.0 19, 206.0 MAP Lio 3A _ 5 UNIT SLEEPING ROOMS 9 2ND LOT(S) 9 s® 3 UNIT SLEEPING ROOMS 12 1 30'-0' 1, 260 >, 260 2, 134.0 25, 608.0 ZONE DESCRPTION LOT AREA 800,624.08 SF. (18.3798 ACRES) �4 MANAGER'S RES. 2 TBD TBD (2 x 1,450) 2, 900 2, 900 2, 900 CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION CARE'TAKER'S RES. 1 TBD TBD 1, 450 1, 450 1, 450 1, 450 OCCUPANCY GRouP GATE HOUSE 1 1 TBD 1, 060 1, 060 1, 060 1, 060 ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED REOUIREMENTS NOTES REFERENCE POOL HOUSE . 1 1 TBD 1, 060 1, 060 1, 060 1, 060 zoN�NG Mtf MI Q MAINTENANCE 1 1 TBD 1, 900 1, 900 1, 900 1, 900 LOT SIZE 18.3798 ACLS 80,OOOSF.M"N sc Butz SCHEDULE . o 800,624.08 SF. 0 .0 0 MECH. EQUIP. BLDG. 1 1 TBD 1, 430 1, 430 1, 430 1, 430 LOT WIDTH 3 870.0' 150 FT.Mo� =TOTAL 28 57, 693 53, 64D.5 94, 18fi.5 LOT DEPTH _ t 860.0' 150 FT.Mi,l _ FRONT YARD Z 35 ET.MrN. , BUILDING NOTE., SIDE YAC I 25 FT.M.N. 1. ALL BUINDINGS WILL BE FULLY SPR!NKLERED. BOTH SIDE YARDS 50 F r ML Q REAR YARD 25 FT. ' . SETBACK FROM WATER 75 FT. SC 100-235 LANDSCAPING 20%M!'+1. Sc BULK SCHEDULE LOT COVERAGE - z W 15' FRONT LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG THE SC 100-212 FRONT LOT LME 5' ABUTTING THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING J 7 SEE BUILDING ANALYSIS FOR BUILDING COVERAGE BREAKDOWN C� V 20' BUFFER TO RESIDENCES, DOUBLE ROW SC 100-213 _ 6' HGH EVERGREEN, 10' OC --� Z BUILDINGS 94,186 SO.FT. ___ (,� LOT COVERAGE SEE BUI M, = SC BULK SCHEDULE PRIMARY PATHWAY � 40,149 SOFT. ANALYSIS�E �� Soy MAX. � Q � z ., SECONDARY PATHWAY 4,596 SOFT. BUILDING HEIGHT ANALYSIS 35 FT, 2 STORIES MAX _ sc BULK SCHEDULE z W z O PARKING 168 212 SEE PARKING TABLE SC 100-191 Q -� Q }� DRIVES / PARKING AREAS 77,511 SO.FT. _ p J m SF.LANDSCAPING WTTHM PAVED PORTION FOR EACH SPACE, W.N.1 -�- - - SC100-214 A -�. o J BRIDGES 1,658 SOFT. PARKS TREE 2' FOR EACH 10 SPACES, M'N. 100SF.M',q DIM.8' 4 p Z Q Q A 4 FT.WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA ALONG THE PERIMETER OF PARKMG, SC100-214 B - Qom.. POOL 2,900 SOFT. MN.1 TREE 2• FOR EVERY 40 FT. -�- N Q = p � caca POOL WALKWAY 4,977 SO.FT. LOADING 32,800 SF. 2-3 LOADING DOCKS - 5,000-25,000 SFS ONE BERTH., EA ADD 1 BERTH FOR EA.ADD. SC 100-192 25,000 SF. HOTELS, 1 BERTH FOR EA 25,000 SF.,15 W., 14' HGH, 45' LONG, UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS 16 TO ST. STREET ACCESS IT M^N.WIDTH SC 100-239.4 0 FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD 150 FT.FROM ALL PORTIONS OF THE FACILITY OR EXTERIOR WALLS, AMBULANCE ACCESS CLOSER THAN 300 FT.MAY BE NYS FC 503.1.1 w LOT COVERAGE TOTAL: 225 977 SQ.FT. EXCEPT IF SPRINKLERED, 300 FT. REOunED BY TOWN �? O - - r; z o 20 FT.WDE,13.5 FT HIGH - c� 225,977 SO.FT. / 800,624 SO.FT. a 28.2% < 30% OK AE9 - -- -- a6 -- o to >- N FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION SC Q - o CONSTRUCTION HOTEL TYPE I, I WITH FIREPROOFING COLUMNS AND BEAMS NYS BC 602 Q < < mo RESTAURANIT TYPE II BECAUSE THE TWO BUILD!N, ARE ATTACHED, THEY MIGHT BE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED CONSIDERED AS ONE Bu�D!'Na WHCH M!GW ALLOW HAVING FFLUID CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO. HOWEVER, REFER SPACES BELOW. BUILDING NAME ISE REOUIREMENTS OUANTY/ AREA REQUIRED HAUL z 1SPA/HOTEL/RESTAURANT UNITS TYPE v HEIGHT AND AREA ZONING CODE REOUIRES 3S, 2 STORY MAX f=- ;r (HOTEL) HOTEL 1 PER GUEST ROOM 27 ROOMS 27 UNITS R-1 TYPE VA:3 STORY,12;000 SF. TYPE VT31 HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE ON BMROR NYS BC 503 ° (RESTAURANT) RESTAURANT 1 PER 100 sq.ft. 7,400 sq.ft. + 10 EMP. 84 WALL F FIRE-SEPERATION DISTANCE IS)-10 FT,NR 'O t �J = o (OFFICE) OFFICE 1 PER 100 sq.ft. 1,100 sq.ft. 11 TYPE vS 2 STORY,7,00o SF. NYs ec TABLE sot (GIFT SHOP) RETAIL 1 PER 200 sq.ft. 200 sq.ft. 1 OTHER CONST TYP.1 HOUR F FIVE-st�ERA'TION , ' - DISTANCE IS)-30 FT,NR HOTEL R 1S TYPE 1!A 4 STORY,24,000 SF. TF C-OMBINE � HOTEL+ RESTAURANT, TOTAL BUILDING AREA NYS BC TABLE 503 LJ CENTER BUILDING ACCESSORY MTG ROOM N/A 0 0 TYPE II B,4 STORY,16,000 SF. EXCEED 24,000, WFGCH REOUInES TYPE I CONSTRUCTION 9 BLDGS R 5 UNITS RESTAURANT',A2 11,571 SF TYPE I A,3 STORY, SF. OTHERWISE,FIRE WALL SEPARATION IS FREOUFIED NYS BC 705 l av -� cLo . .3A 5 UNIT SLEEPING ROOMS HOTEL 1 PER GUEST ROOM 45 -- _-__-- _ � o � �., � o PER BLDG (NMUDINGI CONNECTM STR"') TYPE I, UNLIMITED AREA 1hTM FRONTAGE CAN BE INCREASED NYS BC 5os2 w TOTAL OF MOTEL+ TYPE I, UNLJMTT ED,TYPE I A,15,500 SF. HOWEVER, F SPRINKLERED,THE MX SF. MAY BE INCREASED 200% NYS BC 5062 ae 3 UNIT SLEEPING ROOMS HOTEL 1 PER GUEST ROOM 12 BLDGS 3 UNITS 36 PER BLDG RESTAURAhVf-32 879 SF. FIFE-RESISTANCE-COLT.. 3 HOURS, FIRE WALL CONST.BETWEEN A, R NYS BC 705 4 MANAGER'S RES. 1-FAMILY DWELLING 2 2 BLDGS * 2 PER RES. 4 • FIRE PARTITIONS SEPARATION BETVb'EEN UNITS, HOUR NYS BC 708 co rn �5 CARETAKER'S RES. 1-FAMILY DWELLING 2 2 BLDGS A 2 PER RES. 2 INTERIOR FN!SH NYS BC 801 ; 0 UMTS R-1 TABLE 803.4 I GATE HOUSE ACCESSORY TO HOTEL/SPA N/A 0 0 HOTEL R-1 TABLE 803.4 ACCESSORY TO HOTEL RESTAURANT, TABLE 803.4 Q POOL HOUSE N/A 0 0 NO OCCUPANCY FIRE PROTECTION SYS FM Nn BC 900 pUNTS,HOTEL, v 8 MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE OR 1 PER 1,000 sq.ft. 1,900 sq.ft. 2 R-1 you NYs BC 90327 Z x STORAGE BLDG q RETAURANT,A2 SPRINKLER IS REQUIRED, AS FLOOR AREA EXCEEDS 5,000 SF.(10,800 NYS BC 90321.2 .N i SFJ AND EXCEED 100 OCCUPANT LOAD ASSUME 5,000 SF.RESTAURANT, MAX.OCCUPANT LOAD IS O N MECH. EQUIP. BLDG ACCESSORY TO HOTEL N/A 0 0 5000/15-334 NO OCCUPANCY r EGRESS NYS BC 1000 TOTAL: 212 UNITS R-1 HOTEL R-1 RETAURANT,A2 ACCESSaU Y NYS BC 1100 V UNIT'S R-1 7 UMTS W.N.TO BE ACCESSIBLE NYS BC TAKE 1107.6.1 y INTERIOR ENVIRON%AENT NYS 1200 c 0 r EXTERIOR WALLS NYS BC 1300 � � r UTG_tT1ES :x V O � " R :CTRK�TY LIPA z 0 WATER i SUFFOLK COUN Y WATER AUTHORITY Zo _ �R C�Ory ww��/ ° Lo Lo CAS DRAWING NO.: 6 +tee■ Z w ` QQF-Z ZwWn=m�� WVO� > wn �..�Lw4 ZF- JZ~w��Q= 7_ a'Zu U) r-UTOO t goo_o �O �QzLaL, a�a, a oZW�;�Qm�� .:. ww0 c�Ow� OZ~ 1 ?�CFwm �U�wZJQw z ► 2wC3 ow W �w T , V)a).<LLI Z „ nbi . z_j o�zo -F-zQQ3 c�QmiQI�z<Q0 , 0 144'-0' \ OvER4LL DIPS. OF OVAL SNAPS _ 0 i / \ , p ' \ / Z \ / EXTENTS OF EXISTING \ BUILDINGS TO BE REMOVED / -----------_-- __----------------------- z , 1 r GENERALi IL ' � - RESERVATIONS MANAGE- ACCT. -RI CEPTION �FFICE IOFFICE GII=T SHOP I , ;LOBBY I I uJ W � lzo O I i i V O °° 0 MEP MECHANICAL / I 1 ' J 0 O 1 \ I I , J I `-� 0 0 O ' ° KrTCHEN� a ��, RST URA � . � � o a 3 �' Q TO Q \ \ \ / AREA; ' Cn C3 to cn zr 1 ' I 0 QOd O �° f I - --- - ; ONSEN I\ a I I I n ' -- ---- - - °°o�O o LL.W.. ' I EtESI I ^ p r WAITING \ z L o AREA / I o (n > N m z Z t \ I I Q cap t m Q� 0 0 s � 6NSEN II o o° REFLECTING // I w a ` I \ POOL \I I U 3 /� v I , ` 1 0 / , r I I U ,Z , 000 E , "-- o O10 \ I\ I rn O 757 I 09 f SPA q ODLo MS I I J ,G I I I 1 I 1 (V i I I I I \ \ I I cD .. `------------------ ------------------ ' -y (c) >� n 1 I 1 O ai� z L ♦ J X ------------------------------- \` I > GROUND FLR PLAN o °' O -6SALE- 1/161 11-01 ® ON u Z N 0 Lo DRAWING NO.: 0+ ZnLatW n L) GJYWWm QdrZ � Q Zb�1� - LA p " �cwno?p� Z zp2Q� 0 : � J U.dNz X <0 - �Z Zu azcwn 01 �v, -�=op r CL CL F2 rOZWN�`rw�U �O0"'O (Y� -O<zw�`- .. wwV OUwcr OZr--_j �(n 3: O w Wz�W QUA of—QcD (nit--� R ryw7--� <Ld r - W�WU Z -� of V) 0¢ -Z hZQQ?E UQmid4°°Z::iUO, L 144'-m' OVERALL DIMS.OF OVAL SHAPE Go c� \ \ O Zr EXTENTS OF EXISTING RiEM�OVEI) IpINCsS TO 13E - - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - -� � — �— - - - - - - -- - - - - - _ — 201 202 RM. I T w- 203 (1) M -203M \ I �04 I I --- - --- —-- I 7) RM. i f I � 205 OPENTO JAN. U BELOW I I i J Z O MECIA' RM. STORAGE RM. I I - ----- C� O J 226 -� 206 I -r \ RM. --- ---� - CL Q = p \ RM. I OPEN T _ 207 I Cn to to \225 o _ . o "� � BELa r RM. I o RMI- - - - - - -SUITE SUfTE \ 208 ' 22d 1 2 \ O c� I / t ------ -- — ----- O cv o OPEN TO RM. I CA > BELOW209 ----- — - I i I _ wQz o RM. I I r I Q o 223 — o U o RM. I - ----- - - I -- REFLECTING 210\ • i . RM.I POOL - -_ - -- U 3 _� 222 BELOW I -- �• U Q I - \ RM. ----- _ U_ 211 '. RM. I I o \ 212 2200 RM. I I I �4.�,� ! I / I I i I 213 �J - _ RM. I i \214 I I I el`�0J ca� j RM. 215 \ I l I (0 0) RM. 219 RM. RM. 216 I I �- O .- I 218 217 L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � � L - - - - - - - -- - — - - — - — _- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I , v Q \ O u N 4-' SECOND FLR PLAN \\ 1 p +, m -1.1b SCALE: 1/16' = I'-0' _ ® •r--1 N 0 u i Z N tD m N 0 r k - DRAWING NO.: ul c�W �- O �— W La (n I i L r(/� =0Zm�cn-kZ f.e aw�z� �Z~wOvQaT 4 dzU) T hNUOO k ZOO—O �Q�ZOQZLA ttg' CL V _ �wC3� Ow LAJQN Q -Z =j OJW�r OQp� R HZQQZ:�iUO t- a 112'-0' 4 20'-0' L 20'-0' 20'-0' 20'-0• 20'-0' m 5-9 100'-6' 60'-6' O Z Z � w CL • I i , I I I �, J , U � .,1,. STOR. 1 © _J Q U TZ—� F- z WOMEN S - '' 0 _I Q F- ROOM �. Ofo LLJ I F-J] /u\ -� w Q i o j MOVE45LE PARTITIONS TYPICAL - ' KITCHEN PLATFORM MEETING e AREARt ROOM o O rn a 3 v� Z O m i N O � LLJ Z z J S E MEN'S ROOM I _�._.._._. ui }.. .,. ix z STOR. Ln \ ~ 0, V N HALLWAY s Cc DECK ' � in N (D to?-1 _ 3 to 2-1 0 0 Of U r. 1 GROUND FLR PLAN o a� ® � m � 42a SCALE: 1/4' - 1'-m' N c ZN m N.o t0 0 Ln DRAWING NO.: . i ZowLI) t >DoaYwWcr Qar� z [�Zw�Qro�cr� WW�g �Qwt3QWwrQi w0�ti Q� Q 5_ Wo (/1=� =Orc_n � z�4 Z(n fn-NZZU=IUiU 0-0 �� o ZW 0ZwNjQm�U Lj C) Uo>(w ow k LdMi --m <Uwi.�QOZaw LijF-wUJ ZJQLJ�z T n�� 0Jw�1-OQpa 1 - F--�QQ`s UQ�¢(-iZ:�itJO w . C O - . o� 6'-0' 15'-0' l5'-0' -0' O Z i - • S • - e n _l W — -- --- _-- - - cA Z LILT r - ___ -- -- ---- - -- - _---_-_- ---- -� �- z . . _. j- - -- ---- u_ W ----------------- TV z Tv Tv z O `� - - - - - - — � p j g — - - - - - W a� 0 - – – – – – – O SLEEPING UN 1 z0 I O ---� -- W 0 Q r z I AREA 420 S , 1 Y z I S EPING NfT _ (� SLEEPING UN p I 1 O ❑ 0 I ? Q W -ro f 0 ►- ' Y AREA 42 SO.FT. , AREA 420 S i O ❑ — e -- --- ___LL.. _: ❑ 0 I i to (A I SLEE ING I ... .._._... .._ I _ SEEPING SLEE ING I PLAT O --- CL. I O - - - - - - - CL. I PL�TFORM H rn PLAT OR ( CL. ! ---- TATA I MATITA nTATA I MAT - AMI MAT ` ' o .9 i (n N FRI � V _.....__..__..___..: ____: i -- - - ,- --• j o i G �REFRI -- - --- T � - -- ? o � L-) 0 tFRIG l - — - x F a _ tB T R ' I - - --- -- -- — ' w } . — - - _ - HR M s V v B T R _ 1._ - - -- -- --- - - °� z - _ 2 2 1.--- - _ 2 -0 — — - — -- -- 5 - ~ 3 CL CL. 0 t j i T_ 0. DECK A E 87 S G `• O LL 22'-6' oco Lo _ O 0 3L X GROUND FLR PLAN _ o � o -1.3a SCALE- 1/4' = I'-0' . _ Ct'S 01 0 0 m ® .� � N .�., v � u O N cc . Z � N c0 _ O0 Lei DRAWING NO.: ■ ZOW(n �O0O wwcy QZSf-- —ZW�C,ID=O~ . .. QI—z F...w(K WW�w - aQi'4,'W ofQ � owo> Wo. �(Lwa - d Ow -jwmL-i-Xo>-w cn of O _ 00-0 '. w0F �zzw z WL,w w'� X_-m_ cn Z(�0-Z �1_(n UTOO F �glz a- ii OW k . ow- LilL Q�w� Z�--� Op LLJ LJ I f—` � UQ��Ii � r _ � QQUO ZOJt��r—OQp� c LINE OF ROOF ABOVE �. (00'-0' D 39'-3. m O_ b' 6' 6' •S '> 15'-0' 15'-0' \ / Z w �� ,— - ------------ -- --1 -- ----- --- / Q w a: \ ------ ---_--- --- ( J w z O U c=n ---- ---- ---- -- - J H z ---- - - J F- N TV — 7 0 0 o mo O — -- - --- ---- -�--- O w I -©2 ZO j I ZO ! I w >- 11 Y IS EPi G NIT # SLEEIPI G UNIT I Y ) w TO ❑ O IA A = 426 SOFT. i AREA = 420 S4. . i O ❑ I (1) a) (� � � I © I 3 v (P r' I SLEEPING SLEE ING I , -P TFORM -PLA�TPfJRM- - - J - CL. �- - - - - - - - - - - I o c TA AMI MAT TATA I MAT L p Cn m N Z O < < � im r - jREFRI � -- -- -- � ; I � FRIG N - - -- - r- �J HR M AIH- "3 A / --- - -- -- - - - - -- - 3 V ,cz 5. / DC AE = 91S DC AE = 9S I i \ I ceT — — — — — — — — — — — N t N X SECOND FLR PLAN o -1.3b SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' I Qj +) U v �..� m ® •� L a U oLo cD m N p 1 "1 0 L DRAWING NO.: Z ow W VO> ><WK i J�WCL Q`tF W CCZ�t�O.J� aQ Q.> wLlio �U1= =0>tn W�ZD <Zt-WOInWa- U?�WEULLJ LL L,, Z07m�U')-��Z ZLi O OOZU) =00 �f-�v)ZU CCD O ZWIi. •�,; � 0Ztj tjwOa�OW W WUW U0WO; OZh--� Y " - - _ ••tet w� W QUCr CEJ,-C) cr Liz_j gui . . =NirtY-' O�l��t-OOQZ F- ZQQ3 UQ:2ZE[Ez UO od 11 f1 2 z z z TT - - • 8 z z `F � z z z z z z z 2 z a z z z z 2 z z z a � 8 • m ' C . - O ELEVATION a SCALE: 1/16' = I'-c' p Z - _ W Cc — . — — 2 co W z — ._. -.r.,.i... ..,__.•a.,... .,..._,....a..r�u..u.._.,,.e...._... ..,.«....w,...•+.......e..w.^r �...1.-.._.a" - / r1w•,w....,..... _ O O J ~ WLl aW o0 co ELEVATIONco co a SCALE: 1/16' = I'-m' co uj- —— - — ti - -- —- - —-- - ---- _ u 3 z z z z z z i z z z z z z z z z z z •�• v, a __ - --. -- - -- - - - __ - — rte;+i•. +:�. _• ---a�i -y.a,c_ ��r i.-a...-�._-.,r ,moi," t... ;L— -_ _ '�- ____. -c,. .�_-' _ _._. -...r -i.-. - —_ - —., __ -- _ "..1 ( ) , _ - _ �:r:: '�,i.j ��.�� Vit`� '�Y' c',',i- <<. :) r, :<,• '/. '/. - - - - � � - 1 Mi 'N'TJ J: :F 0 / - i 2 r. •'i' ti '=r ->:.:� iv-�,-S•' -:�-ma=r _ c� r? r'_i Lo 3 ELEVATION F -3.1a � SCALE: I/16' = I'-m' � S '! t0 N r 04 ti O co elf - - e .s; th { J } i - L -y C - i U v -d � 'a_.,. _...:....�..._......._...�.,.�..,......-........._....•...w.. .__ __'..wtm...:a......,,..... .m,......�.._............,,......_.."..._._.....-...,._,.-..........a.,_...-..........._....,__..�.....,.....,-.....................�..-.Q.....�........m...._.......>..-......_...._.__...-._......_.aw_....__.,....a..........,�........_......_....... _.-.._....._.,....__.,.-...._. »_.._...,......"..,....,.......,........-..,...�.»s.»...,...-,-...,._._.....<___......"....._._..._..>._.....,.....-......:-.M...._.._.._,..».w........_......._...-.......L..x..........._sr....._.....-.i.. .�...� e •►-�� L +� o " o. O v 4 ELEVATION R D AW NG NO.. -3.1a SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0' 301 ZoLa(f)- I� OOMYUAWW Z T- r_ WtilL_� WQ`� ?� wa :. QQr-� �ZEd �crfr k.- N 5; hW- > T-�p W7� f Q u 0�� J(nwc�=C�� to LAA�"z� -Z w `nUS cr LLJ p t Uj ZV'.alzrn �}-V)v ``'SAO Z 7 U �00 -p � ��_(J <.el ilZ�f•2a- OZ wO?WOW E _ Wj=�� <oLLJrf pZQw r F-(n(y 0 Q J 1--0 OV O 00 00 00 Occ oo 6l ;100, O C —_ - - r t b corrnn z w Z > U z 1 FRONT ELEVATION to w U z -32 SCALE: 1/8' = I'-m' -�-1 W z � w � En Jap MO O <1o zwLL 0 Q ; = 3 w Q = o �-� U wc a ( coco f c7 cl) >- N Ap Q m o w z Q Q to _�� a v o cn o O) " - a �V y� W Y - — - _ — --- - --- - -- V c � 3 t 61 E-E d oz c • nn in o U. W " SIDE ELEVATION o � 2 to " �42 SCALE: 1/8' = I'-m' Z X -tai r ^ C 0 0 0 •r•I m Lo -�-� Q) C,4 sU) ComC ,. z DRAWING NO.: - tlot 4 �" QF W w<EL OJ~(rQ O W fn_, E)m cn W W Er - - Q7=F— ' Ll _j co OF- WwowQ > WC-ULAJ )< LL O S f U)NLYW_C� =0Z �Q�z Z�'-aZcwn �r�7I_0T0O QU. OD-O- of Qt- ZW F_ y aJZaF:o 07 Na (D Cr LJ c� O F---_j .9 r wm�Wm <0O w: Z w a S F �m<<wFz 00 O ►-ZaQ� Q a:zuo wrw0� 7J OZ , OO SSW OJ��F-OQpa O _ cc ,. (P p V) i r 0 µ z co 2"-b 2'-(o' o _j 3 Q � ^ V, > DW (� z O -� o J o . - SIDE ELEVATION 1 REAR ELEVATION 2 -3.3 SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' a VJ W (� SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' lo 00 00 0 n i O W Z Z lok Q U � p . oo oo oo p 00 00 ----------- - — - J }� ` . lo - - - --- — - — — � N ry 3 r mill III t - 7-4 REAR ELEVATION F Y 00 00 _ --- 0 r CO X CLL i~ oo oo oo oo - i -4—) m B ® •� = N 1 L N � Z 3 FRONT ELEVATION m r'1 N • -3.3 SCALE: I/4' = r-0' . . DRAWING NO.: , 5 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: _ 1/8' = 1'-0', - r " PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�®SUFFO(,�-coG p 0. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h`Z` y Chairman ® Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 CIO Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO w Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 �I®l ��® MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD loana � VE. MEMORANDUM JUL 9 4 SO Southold Town Board of Trustees Date: July 24, 2003 To: Town Trustees From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer/5 Re: Preliminary Site Plan Approval and Review for Oki-Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII Status: Active Site Plan proposed being processed. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments and concerns. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Young & Young , dated 05/05/03 and received by the Planning Board 06/25/03. i Young & Young \ 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 631-727-2303 0 ` Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor �g Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer btl8 \ ` \ Robert C. Tast, Architect � o Ronald E. Pfuhl, Landscape Architect �g \ O olrl\'r ��p \ \\ 51 TE DATA TOTAL AREA = 18.1115 ACRES 0 0'r, 0( ` ,' \\ ` OR 815,013 50. FT. \ \\ DREDGED BASIN AREA = 1.3862 ACRES / \ ,Q�Q� S \\ UPLAND AREA 17.3253 ACRES ' \ \ • • • • / �L \ \ MAINTAINAGE BUILDING 3,125 50. FT.= PUMP HOUSE =283 50. FT. + <O /Cl- \ MANAGER'S HOUSE 1•,200 SQ. FT. 0 Q QtJj -. PYRAMID HOUSE _.516 SQ. FT. + 9' UNITS (2,400 X 15 UNITS) = 36,000 50. FT. \ R LL 8 45 50. FT. Q(� ,� 9 IPJ \\ OFFICES = 960 50. FT. j . / \ , \ ` ��t� / .} O \ \ & SHOWERS = 450 50. FT. HOTEL = 21,319 50. FT. + + + '' �' \ a RESTAURANT = 10 00 5Q. FT. + o • • • / + \ / \ \ TENNIS COURT = 8,825 50. FT. + + + \ + '' �9 \ �� C PATIOS = 11,008 50. FT. '} '� \ / 'ti�0 TOTAL = 108,'Igl SQ. FT. + Q� + + \ \ \ BUILDING LOT COVERAGE / \ 4�j0 ` \ 105,191 SQ. FT. / 815,0"73 50. FT. = 135!5 + + + + + ` \\ PARKING CALCULATION / + + •� \ / G�� \ ` HOTEL =125 UNITS a INNIT = 125 SPACES . . . " ' \\ \ RESTAURANT + + \ + = 8/ \ 10,800 S.F. FLR AREA a 1/100 S.F. = 10SPACES "` + \ C \ \ +10 EMPLOYEES a I/EMPLOYEE = 10 SPACES + / OGS \\ \\ /+ PAR PARKiNb REQUIRED = c 43 SPACES + \ N6 PROVIDED 1"11 SPACES / o MOUSE + a d� + .S' / � �(4 \ }. o \ / + V. \ �l� X \ /�*H f� ZONING USE D15TRICT = MARINE II (MII) DISTRICT >F �,'. , . NUI // ,' / + * \ + 01, 'LO �' \\ \ °� VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) ; P/�\� \\ ' BENCH MARK MONUMENT X325 j / \ / e� + + ELEVATION 16.05 -/ of �<- •� \ j \ ,,/ �(;3 0� \ rry \ v / ° + `� * + 00 + \ Sr OARVENMMrd JV + / \ + Q� C + + + + \ pt J ° ry rye ,TOT" ,� N + \4 \ �' + + 0 , ° ° + \ u`�` o ;yb q + + \ \ \0 0 + r . \ , \ \ o ° O + COQ \ `\ ° . . . . . ......:... ..'.'.,.,.,...,.....,...,...,...,.'.'. \ o \\ \ \!ter` _ + ry + < ° \\ O PP511 \ � . ,F \ . . . , , , 4;9j O� ` + + . . . . . 9. \ IL � � - dlZ . �� , .' 1 , . ..•. , :• o r� ap . . . . \ H z -1: LL . ' .. I / � 011 M 0 ° ° \ \ .\ � . : + + O\\ , \ + _ ' AX Ir qu 6o O P51? CO lip + + ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION • �O Oj,y \� ► I • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER 5UPPLY(5) AND/OR Ov+ ro / r SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM(5) FOR THIS PROJECT WERE \ ry _{�,Q \� � .� I DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. BASED UPON A 0¢ 0�\ Airy I / CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY OF THE 501L, SITE AND �'� I GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS, ALL LOTS, A5 PROPOS �o O w CONFORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTM H \ • �� + SERVICES CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EF \ \ • �o o+; / DATE. q G VV0 Q� � ° ` \ • / � ,��hi'r�. ,�''�P,��..L��i��r�'�-� tom" ~ "°''• "M` "'`� (y� y \ O \ ry HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.5. L.5. NO. 455931 ` + 4- THOMAS G. V401-PERT, N.Y.5. P.E. NO. 61453 ' \ Cly wlr�Ir�rirus Poops �J ,� \ - • ,� °rY VV� 'ms`s (�` � �` a 5URVE' VS CERTIFICATION THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY AND 1:1P518 , p.9 3, � >`jp LENS / �ry ,�j TOPOGRA=HIGAL SURVEYS MADE BY U5. ry iL-VV `\ °rya + 4F `\ \ ♦ + ¢�\ Ada �\"yk � c4, �� •. t'" '( -- �'�'�' � p �Z,� + 0 00 ,� Q 0HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45893 /O 45v� 3 \ O HOLL I STI O HEALTH I NS I TUTS \ \ ° .,� OCG I -DO LTD. ° . . 10 \ \ \ ,pA At East Marion, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York \ + b County Tax Map District IOOO Section 58 Block O'I Lot -7.I \� PP58 LAND50APE AND AL I GNEMENT + - PLAN 0 ;,FEW O61\ 61 J U N 2 5 2003 MAP PREPARED MAY. 5, 2003 B Southold Town SCALE: I"=40' § � n5 Planning Board JOB NO. 1999-0613 OF 3 DWG. 990613_990"f33_landscape.dwg Q - MONUMENT SET ® - MONUMENT FOUND - STAKE SET A- STAKE FOUND 'x Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 631-727-2303 Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Robert C. Tast, Architect " < Ronald E. Pfuhl, Landscape Architectg + LEGEND / / / \ / / ) . 5.11 -r5 G6 \ /017 �• \ \ 0 // / // - 5 \ 7 c�0 Qj� (Jy / = BUILDING SETBACK LINE �( �/� 0 � � _ / RIM SONG \ � \ \ GG = NEW CONCRETE CURB 0 v � \� ■3 d�° //'S�\ ` \ \ BGC = NEW MOUNTABLENEN BLCONCRETE BLOCK CURB �/ / `\` �• 1 8.26 /� / ®0. GRI 1925 // �\ / \ "J \ \\ 5'G5W = NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK d 51ZB HRMP = NEW HANDICAP RAMP \./ PPS4 = NEW PAINTED PARKING STALL 4 QUANTITY � \ \ \ FEN5AOOD 34ct3`1.16bSDFI �♦ a o ( \ / a.lo = NEW FENCE, HEIGHT 4 TYPE / _ a � IM-11.25 a Q� \ \ SB = NEW STEEL BOLLARDS _ } THAP '918 NYSDOTAP = NEW N.Y.S. DOT. ASPHALT PAVEMENT = NEW TOWN HIGHWAY ASPHALT PAVEMENT � RGAP = NEW RECYCLED CONCRETE AGGRAGATE (RGA) PAVEMENT = NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT GGP T '! t �� e0' \ \ / 'i \ \ SBP = NEW STONEBLEND PAVEMENT / �0 \\ \ \yP + 11.86 + 7.01 ♦ p 0 �' ,J \ t DAP = NEW DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 1 / + 11.34 , \ \ �� 8 7.05 /j \ / # EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT / `�• ,/ \\ �0`j� (�� \\ 14 4 �.J \ I 01c \\ \ 24"CHD = NEW CONCRETE HEADER 4 SIZE v /o \` LF = NEW LEACHING FIELD 9.15 FI A j - _ 7 5®I0DX 12 = QUANTITY, DIAMETER 4 EFFECTIVE DEPTH 15. RI•3.1.-15 / � \� \ p � \\ RD = NEW ROOF DRAIN o NEW CATCH BASIN I / 10 t B 9.12-2DFI + 12.25 / �' o YCB = NEW YARD CATCH BASIN RIM-11.50 \�` \ �` G� \ Lr_B\ J DMH = NEW LEACHING CATCH BASIN + 15,44 / \ + a72 TMH NEW TELEPHONE MANHOLE I / �\� � \\ I � o � \ \� \ / = NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE / ��0 0� ✓� �� oRM WA R _ A T .' �` / \ \ \\ 5MH VERFLo 9.n W = NEW HEADWALL I N \ 0a \ \ J o/ o �� E5 = NEW END SECTION I 0� 0 FLUSH INLET lad ��\\ \ + 1 6 �/ // I �/ a .14 a n �` / OG/j \ \\ \ 2DFI = 2'DIA FLUSH INLET �r�\ Gt?a \ I /�/ .ry ° o FT=1/ / e �` 6.a2 ♦S' \ \ \\ GI = CURB INLET \ GIG = CAST IRON COVER / / , S` O N. / J\ / MH a * 12' /' \ ...•s \` �� \ \ / 5T = NEW SEPTIC TANK I \ /I/ i / \ ^ •• 4 �� /N\ 8.14 \ CP = NEW CESSPOOL 0 IE-555 00• y�y�y_/ / I ••p�� •• \� 01 \ ' DGP = NEW D15TRIBUTION CESSPOOL YCLE WA \ I A�f�� h® GB 9.18-2D O \ , +8 / rH '� GT = NEW GREASE TRAP 10.°10 FROM PO • �F��• •. \pA M■9.00 O�� \ ♦ o f6 I \ C \ 8.15 \ � �"� � FGP = FUTURE CESSPOOL �6�oj. / 0 IE•499ir 1 's •c . 2 + NEW HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE d 51ZE / �Ot \t��(I'- \ // F i I �Y \ .�. 02 �' \ \ e 3 ♦` \ / . " 24"RCP = NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE S SIZE I \ / I I ,s 9.50 - i so q s ..'� \ / \\ ` �' �' I` 12"WM = WATER MAIN 4 SIZE a 2"WSYSIM = NEW WATER SERVICE 4 SIZE ' / / 7O --- --- - RIM.q- DF q . . a, \\ ♦ \ HYD 0 \ \ \ _ _ b '4 O = NEW FIRE HYDRANT 1 1 0�0 / // 4.25 Ie• ,�` 1 •••••' \\ / \ \ ♦ \6� / WMT = NEW WATER VALVE . y rbc I �♦ , \ \ \\ 71 ` a1 �y �� 'I(�+ s �. WV LVE ' \ / 7 / I d• Qj + a.as a b v� �` ' \\ `� / y 6.9a RPZM = NEW RPZ 4 METER VAULT >F ' 20.48 / / // + 16.80 ; `` \ 9.06 TRF < 1 �\ 1 cB -2 \ 6.21 �� . 46 / = NEW TRANSFORMER / \ I ' UE7G7\/ = NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE 4 GABLE T.V. 9.19-2Da1G �/ SLITE M / 1 p \ / = OVERHEAD WIRES a H �� r ' 7 ) 1 o. o M'755 \ 6 +9.50 ` .' 6.51y = NEW STREET LIGHT F / 4' 1 •2.10 ` ♦, PL17E NEW PEDESs� / r ♦ \ X7.06 = TRIAN LIGHT F // \`� \ / 6 /* Is.a 1 1 / 1 00 e♦ \ 9.20 ,1 +754 a3 Sr E- = EXISTING >f� ") +7.29 IFSt \\ 1 IL 0 • \ \ , 6.80 X Ebb B ` / \ 1.14 20.50 = NEW SPOT ELEVATION > �� 0� 0C / / f L` R1 ■ Loo _ eo' 1 ry \� \ , + , +23.25 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION : 4 * 11.15> a / \`� \ \ / 7n a5/ 20 = NEW CONTOUR \ 0� 8.4-2DFI . F �� / 1 1.00 RIM•900 / •• ` 550 \\ / S 6.38 / OI RD = EXISTING CONTOUR 0q \ y ° h 1 IE•2b4 �tD -'�a I +• � \ � 5� ' 7.sq � = ROOF DRAIN \ + 20.13 \ ,NM 1 E `� \ 65/3 7.1 / 1�' , t / � � SPF \\` �S as// = AREA LIGHT g \2 ` - = PEDESTRIAN LIGHT MH 414. / i O MH 14'00.400% }} s� / g•I / E-2.915 Q RIM•8.8 / 8 RIM■10.49 RI O � +\\ JE-2.9- TRIBUTARY \ TRIBUTARY AREA I \ / 16.95 84 la hQJ dp 9,60 le.b. IE•b.o9 8.50\ \ 1E•2.9 S.F. / 17. 16.90 16.95 / / �\\ "�. I .al m + 1 00 / 9.50 \ / \ �\ I 03 \ \�• / 5ANITARY DESIGN CRITERIA l$ CALCULATIONS R � \ * Ia.Sa � N,�(\P/ 16.70 / y /YQ / / \ a\0•� � ' \ \ i \ X00(` \ / 1 / c \ 4e 8 F \ cB -2DFI GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV \ / / \ / ! /� �Q \� / FM■6.10 \ \ METHOD OF WATER SUPPLY - PUBLIC / ALLOWABLE SANITARY FLOW = 600 GPD/ACRE 16.65 � / / + \ j / I MH 9.- DGIG O IE■2�q \ V \ / i l RIM■ �5 \ \ \ 0� \ l ° 16.60 16.95 / ,( � 0 I 8. a 9 I IE• \\ \ 1-1.3253 ACRES x 600 GPD/ACRE = 10 395 GPD j 1Z 0 10 \ (\ 16.50 / p - 2DFI . •• \ \ \ " I .800 .1. / iC�' 9,5 •q / IE• , � 4® • +u.o 8a :W� ��', .e �......•'••° \• N\ \\ DENSITY CALCULATION j / RESTAURANT= 200 SEATS a 10 GPD/SEAT = 2,000 GPD 30 15.00 R G _ / s ° /16.95 0 16.70 D/ROOM = 3,750 GPD ` \ o / o \6 / � v X�ijllK� / •• •• _ •••' ES 9.4 \: 25 HOTEL ROOMS ® 150 GP = 10 00 GPD 90 // / 7 \ o ab / 9. O / // •.•+ 4 +5.73 1E■2. \ \\ MANAGERS HOUSE ®100 UNITS a 100 D30N0 GPD A 1 0 \i�\�/ O \\\ RI ■142D 1 ■s B9// • •�•• ........ .•� ••. •a •• .• �•••• \ p� = 300 GPD 10.14 \ / / / ■s. \b' / / / •. •� 5.263 • •••• \ R TOTAL PROP05ED FLOW (DENSITY) = 16,050 GPD 'y O DESIGN CALCULATIONS SANITARY SYSTEM ° ° / I .7o n.27 / o ° 0 Ib. / / \�Q ` �Of // CO /''� , . \ •'. a 2 ••••. \ TRIBUTARY AREA V\ ° 'a 16 TH#4 0 / r / // s 545,704 S.F. \ RESTAURANT= 200 SEATS a 30 GPD/SEAT = 6,000 GPD 16.40 '/Y \ rr k �°` � `c r / •• .• •� . 5 \ � \ 100 UNITS ® 100 GPDNNIT n h / �� / / 4 25 HOTEL ROOMS ® 150 GPD/ROOM = 3,750 GPD ` 18.35 \ = 10,000 GPD \ 1a.31 0 511 / Q / / / ia7 o H# / MH 29 .'• •• MANAGERS HOUSE a 300 GPD = 300 GPD \ �♦ 8.9 +la.lo +19,0 \ o ° / „� 0L/ / / / RIM•lo ..g.$. .. 4• \ \ � � 4 •9.42 Ab ••. ,. \ . � p \ G 1 ,g (� e• •3• \ �j TOTAL PROPOSED DESIGN FLOW = 20,050 GPD 15sa o ` IE•13.25 n / IM.n�O / \ S9 SEPTIC TANK ♦ s9 18.70 PPS I .80 / �� o Q 9.5Qf'� �i b 67 / � \ o / 59 « ° 16.02 / < 175 1 / / k + 5. \ • N. \ I6. o ns9° 15.90 X5'6 15.7 // �.?° o \QO O '� A / o \\ REQ. 20 50 GPD x 2 DAYS = 40,100 GAL. �0 I5. \b 15.55 + 0 / I ° p + a.b7 USE (8) 12' DIA, x 7' LIQUID DEPTH TANKS = 42,051 GAL. \ ` \ ° / ,° / / 0 o A•® 9.20 9.20+ I \ &ROUND WATER POND •. LEACHING POOLS 16.99 O / i- �'Wly / \A / 1 \ / �$D 8 6.04 '• ORDINARY WATER LEVEL 1.91 \ 8.22 / �, � 0 "a- MH .•� STORM WATER ` REQ, 20,050 GPD / 1.5 GPD/S.F, = 13 67 5F5WA \ * 19.00 \ 17 O o / / �s' / ` / ` �C` / 8 \ MH 2,4 ••. •• ; '� HIbH WATER EL-4 ♦ '8 ° / 7.09 �♦ ` T \0 2.50. ,3 v� �\ \ USE (43) IO' DIA, x 10' DEEP POOLS = 13,502 SFSWA ♦ �' �` .70 / ♦ � 3 * I ,O RIM-40125 • • 9.00 I \ P 5 1 `� `ry ■u: 8.16 i �c� � I 5.25 �0'• .50 � ,�• +• I � \ \ I 13.59 4 / o ? + •m \ 13.00 RI .9 �' , Ii.LK:11.00 \ \ \\ ` I \bj/ PUMP PIT 13.00 I ``I •9 4 / - DF 8.00 O 50 i 0 5 ` . 0 9.5Q '•• .•• ry '. y \ ♦ \ 5.5 �� vALVE Bo / � � l I 1 L v a5 G8 1.2-FI / Q� 9• / / + \ 9. q - I `Q \\ \\ C, ` ;7' + 11a RIM=15.20 / / / / .tom •9.00 B "Q •• ••• \ 15.40 E=11.94 / o • • ••�• / \0 / / �`V.00 a A0�' E. 4 ?m 9 / o` \ s.�( n.o 10, FF \2 a0 --- e0' ------ -- � -_ 0' �� •.:4.56 a ppp LF NOJ / \ /y + = - _ 545 --__ / \ TEST HOLE DATA �� \\ ♦ q®IODx4 // O � •1� + 1..1.34 + "1 � 13a, $ * 0 1 / / /// r/. , \\0`�; O. iM O Pf60 � p0 ` u � 6 e QQ 0• / \ � •. � \ \\ Z.55 \\*19.\8 a\ \♦\ 7•.'♦>`6 's, , i , \ . oa' ( O t \ ♦♦ ♦ , i' Op1� � � / bb-2 •1,•• ••'•�:•\ ; ..• • ••TE•8.1-.92•1 DF J 2.5 50 50 RI lO5a3 0- WL IM5b • • \\•• / of , •:• \ \, \ \ \ \ \ LOTAHMOI �2 9 E•2 RIM-15 GB\� IE- 61, EL-6.55 0.0' EL-6.1q 0.0' EL-6.67 0.0' IE• o SAND, SAND, SAND, S t < LOAM t gi >W3' SHELLS 2.0' WL•3.69 SHELLS 2.5' SHELLS 10' N < RIM■14.0 ,O O / � / / / \ \ ♦ Ff 11E•2b0 1 I 10 / - - •. •• ♦ • + / / MEDIUM TO CLAYrD o � RIM=1 1 ,y , _ ° O j // - .08 - - - g •• •••. b q+ 7 • + / / +2. WL•9.03 FINE SAND 9.3' SAND BROWN S�jp3 5.00 2DF \ / 9 - � J • / / SILTY \\ ` SIE-10.0 / 9.00 // C / / , 3.02 +�36 '• `� + 2 • MEDIUM SAND 8.0' WL■I.O9 5.6' 8 \ \ NOE•a. / 91E�9.50 a 5 / +b�31/ + 2 33- 2.12 t '• ••• 5 ® ••• • // / i 4.0' BROWN BROWN d \ \ I b 78 / / - 92.91' 2 20 \ + ••. 6.9SILT - \ ♦ NWIE■a. 2 0O EIE•6980 I.O j2' �t 3.56 '`./•. b. / / i + OR6ANIG BO6 2'I \ Gti i •• 4 r\ : / / / 5.0' SILTY 6.0' R M.8.8 3 / 22 •g �9'Ib'48'E B • • 121N 6.00 / 2.27 CLAY 10.0' \ ` 90 8 \ 0 12.00// �a o / �aql \ IE■1.$4g• \t•' SILTY SILTY SAND 0 I '981 / 5.502.54 �0� •e 04.E \ _ ..F•• \ \ / / / 5AND 9.0' SAND q.0' I PSI 1 ti \ / FINE TO 5.0' \ \ `♦ l� // ry \ O \0 �` .?j� 21\ �� ab '. 3 \\ - •.•• \ / / ` 5 a5 ,/ +2 QO /�yi. '! MEDIUM TO COARSE FINE TO Ib.&O ♦♦ / SO / / _ O �Ab9' + +3.88 • i' /�^�� FINE SAND 5AND COARSE MH 2.2 G _ M / e \\ MH 4. ` 0 1 6I'44"!°I'E \ •• \ Y \ \ RIM• IM 00 10. • • // // ��o� W/10% 5AND RIM■10.80 ■5.46 \ + 9.36 Q E■ 5. \\ i✓ S '• +• ' S 19.0' &RAVEL $ / 21.0' I o aA> I .•• \ •. / o/ • � IE=7.98 +•f �\ is 9 ✓ � ® I � I • \ ' •• / THK4 TH05 TRIBUTARY AREA II � �� S ®IOD j0 � . 10.0 +612 \ � / 10,5-73 S.F, \ x GB\2.1-FI \♦ GB 9.1-2DFI 1 a�` . +3.21 \ �j ♦ RIM-10.00 + 1,741 +3.9,6 I m • I / / \ / 10.50 ♦ IE-8.50 H -2DGI \ a IE•7 0 , ♦` M■9.00 • `a / + 6.88 s •• l / SANDY O.O' EL 9.14 BROWN 0.0' \ \� � •9. q � � ` 7.35 � 16^ � . • EL=19.59 . ♦ 1 IE■2.92 xj` \ �+ 6.96 / I + 3.42 / `?. SILT LOAM \ \ 2 10.40 ,��ii��> / ss2 FINE To 1s FINE os' r' `'" * / te` / \ '• \\ : / l \ /'0 COARSE TO 13.03 10.08 Q Q� �' \8 2811.00 /' 1 /b CID \ S '• \ n l / ` / .0 011 5AND MEDIUM O I n' 7.0 0oQi \ I • 1 W/l0% SAND \`\ `\9y I .Id\ ` B 9.00 8.50 QJ > \ I • 1 531 / / / V. I &RAVEL WL=2.64 4.5' \ • .+ +5.18 / 7.0 GREY 0 # 0 `� �a IGB 6.2-2D •. I (y FINE TO CLAY \ MH 2.0 n D o ! • I \ \•.\ 1;.18/ 0 0 0.2� / �� 4\\� 10.50 / `�` �/O RIM•892 1 RIM O b� ry �� '\'\ ••. I .56 / / If 7.01 COARSE 9.0' O IE•4.92 1 3.555 H 69-2DGIG 7'�O 5AND 11. 0 -/ SANDY va.28 - pP� A00`�' _ `�`` II IE■5.89 + RIM / (�<' N 1 +4.64 / • I 1 / + 5.31 /+3.15 Q�/Q' WL•2.89 14.9' CLAY + 8.15 / / \.I `00 + ` / 58®0.400 0 / �hl b ",!(,� O 1� • I •• / / 2.48 l/j CLAYEY 8.0' 1 ♦ O.bt + \ �`. Ap ` / `. 8 Q / p`�'�Y O1Qi- �b\�'i C' '� o,1�•O +II�o« / •'.. '. II ' ,� �1 /// // h Z\<�r FINE TO SAND V ,1,1.0.0'0.50 h COARSE 5AND FINE TO651+ 9.49 533 O , oCOARSE 5.21 \0- SAND 0 (0 ,,.o' 'DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA l$ CALCULATIONS LF No. 0.00 �• / I / / V = ARG F II.O \� ♦ 9.75 0 s 72 ^ /+ 146 o / A = AREA OF TRIBUTARY (S.F) \s\ IE=7.28 \ + 7.q 9.66 \o `.�`` ® + 6.7� �,y r-M ') , �a ✓ / I / I \ R = RAINFALL (FT) `/ q ® q 4 9 s \ •� p9 / ), 8.36 ` / / i \ 9.0 IE■9. V G = COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF / / \ ♦ #1 � � O � � '� + 7.03 � � �D ENG I NEERI S CERTIFICATION O ` *� 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(5) AND/OR \ \ ♦ o IE- 90 � �Q 0� �\ � / * 558 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 5 FOR THI PR TRIBUTARY AREA III \ C, e\51"� \ \ + s ` \ pe Q 24. \ / � TRIBUTARY AREA I TRIBUTARY AREA �/I 12,231 S.F. \`;, 6� a 5.5� \ \ ' COQ 42-you's 6.41 4.04 \ / ( ) TI PROJECT WERE a. 8,70 8.8 �6 \ \ 5.37 ^ � 0 DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. BASED UPON A GB 1.1, 1.2 $ 1.3 TD#3 8.33\ �` ' 8 870 F \ 8• o Q,\' �. \ \ / V CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY OF THE SOIL, SITE AND a3a \ 1 .00 66 4.56 /I GROJNDWATER CONDITIONS, ALL LOTS, AS PROPOS 8� 0 �' WIMMIN6 POOLS Ge 6.1920 FI Op 6336'17 ��\ �\ \ / / 5.87 / �ry G ON�ORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTM OF HE PATIO-11.00 GES GONSTRUGTION STANDARDS IN EF W REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME � �\ DATE. l.aa 4p\�0 �5\ g\s� g�'� 7, 8.35 \ o i I 9626.8 \\ + Q �� \ \\ �/ 260` 68,485 S.F. x 2/12 x O.ciO = 10,273 G.F. 6,3'12 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.85 = a03 G.F. � W + 79.00 6.6 63 PROVIDED VOLUME - PROVIDED VOLUME 8.13 \ ` MH 2.3-GIG USE LEACHING FIELD NO.i � \ Fps USE LEACHING FIELD NO.5 �\ .o (9) 10' DIA. x a' DEEP POOLS = 5 42 G.F 1 \ ♦ \ IE■6.65 P `� 9• 9j * 6.83 / / +3.17 / [/) . -1 S (5) 10 DIA. x 3 DEEP POOLS =1,025 G.F 4p '� `p OVERFLOW TO TRIBUTARY AREA VIII = 4,'731 G.F. \ `"� e 9 ?a k + 6.71 1.• // V. / / �' .,a�; ` �,' �? W X5 PPSIb 6.54 / 6 3.65 �j� s zg HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. LF No.4 H 19 /o \\ THOMAS G. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. 61483 �t 4yh t � \ . ♦ " 50IODx4 = IM■8. A� 4U\ * 5.7 6.8 6.3 1 / / �/ \�i) J < f \�\ \ / •2 4.41 ti` 1..`> N._,,,.-.�h TRIBUTARY AREA II TRIBUTARY AREA VII �'`d 8 T" • O5 2 \� ��-`�'\� �0 � + a� - + 6.16 p 6. �j2A"r A,`� �� 263 s� GB 2.1 +(6.g5 6 8.31 �Q� \�9 � 6 / .�\ 2°p6 `�,, GB 5.1 \tea.\ Psl CKB 9.1 FI 8.03 .(V oa 0 oa QP' 3'83 �i s / �+ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION g-n b• (l" 4 \ \� u 5'-4 / > ,�; +3.18 REQUIRED VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME \ 6.2 797 +� PO \Qr C4, 10,573 S.F. x 2/12 x O.QO = 1,586 G.F. 4,618 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.75 = 577 G.F. ` s l ��• d 32 37 / /!) • THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY AND X40 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYS MADE BY US. \ ° .00 s °33 PROVIDED VOLUME PROVIDED VOLUME \ \ �� \ G,66 3.56 4.21 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.2 USE LEACHING FIELD NOS \ ♦ 5.53 7.31P 1P �.sl �y, I (2) 10' DIA. x b' DEEP POOLS = 821 G.F. (3) 10' DIA. x 3' DEEP POOLS = 616 C.F \ `., -N4 A b, NE OVERFLOWTO TRIBUTARY AREA VIII = 765 G.F. + ob 7 ` 6.20 ASO 3.2a 0\�� TRIBUTARY AREA IV \ \ \ PPsl3 \A�y b� �6 � yO O� \ ` 6 0 1"11358 S.F. 6.a2 + / �0p W G2� \ \ \ 544 �O \v ' K 3 85 2.b0 � \635 �8 •S \ 9, co7.50 p9 /� TRIBUTARY AREA III TRIBUTARY AREA VII TRIBUTARY AREA V oo ��` K,11 ()� 16,808 S.F. 6.45 � . . �P � .n�bry0�' 7D#1 Q TD#2 6.1a \ \ �m0 A90 UP0^6 REQUIRED VOLUME \� \\ \bb3 `� (/ *ry�� \ .�O��q\�� y 6634 QO DA�4\' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 4589 REQUIRED VOLUME dlt� s: �. 9 /C �589 S� , 12231 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.75 = 1566 G.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA `'� p `"'s 4.88'�j �a®IC?I;;s 8.00 6.18 �',tr"`I'��C'^ \ �\'�'��\'� PROVIDED VOLUME 148,461 S.F. x 2/12 x 1.0 = 24,744 G.F. \��.� /C \'\ \♦ "S �9. 7.70 �� * 6 �� IE■8.99 �1� �� t" USE LEACHING FIELD NO.3 NATURAL LANDSCAPE AREA 64 \ 1 740 ,�' 6.81 ,�04�\, Ok (2) 10' DIA. x b' DEEP POOLS = 821 G.F. 408,043 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.1 = 6,801 G.F. �`L� `9�\ 4.80 48 * �74 PIPED TO TRIBUTARY AREA VIII = 745 G.F. . . \ ♦ 1 p 4 e OVERFLOW FROM TRIBUTARY AREAS I, 11, III = 6,241 G.F. �'t \ `` ``qo c 1- b.� \.j 7.25 0 /9, 8. M- 00 MH 1. 10 6.6 1 + 7.72 \ \ 4.37 •4. � RIM.��50 aIO ' \ IE■5.t�1 + 7.61 I. TRIBUTARY AREA I V TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME = 37,786 G.F. \\ 6.0 .15\ I 6.66+ + n'0 PROVIDED VOLUME \\ \ `` 1 a ga oD�' i'' 6T .4.1 ^ \� GB 3.1 USE DRAINAGE PONDS AND PONDING AREA = 44,516 C.F. 6.50 RIE 5 �* 0 + 7.72 �� HOLL I STI G HEALTH I N51 TUTS i 3 RIM= 00 REQUIRED VOLUME \ 5. 6 '6 / 7 8.00 r� IC1,388 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.65 = 2,100 G.F. \N _FI ' OKI -DO LTD. aR r 4, s IM= .40 8.00 PROVIDED VOLUME 54 � le• . o PP58 + 7 s2 1.46 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.4 oO 7. o (8) 10' DIA. x 4' DEEP POOLS = 2,18cf GF 43 7.O 7.0 ''23 At East Marlon, Town of Southold B 4.5 + Suffolk County, New York 1 TRIBUTARY AREA VI 6 372 S.F. / a8 b TRIBUTARY AREA GB •4.1 County Tax Mab District 1000 Section 58 Block 0-7 Lot 7.1 REQUIRED VOLUME \ _ � GRAD I NG DRA I NAGE PLAN 7.27 1(0,50e5 S.F. x 2/12 x 0.80 = 2 TRIBUTARY AREA VI 241 G.F. 4,618 S.F. PROVIDED VOLUME 2 1 USE LEACHING FIELD NO.5 (II) 10' DIA. x 3' DEEP POOLS = 2258 G.F + �< 5 lob F 201 MAP PREPARED MAY. 5, 2003 - MONUMENT SET ® - MONUMENT FOUND A - STAKE SET A- STAKE FOUND SCALE: I"=40' JOB NO. 1999-0613 :20F 3 _ + DWG. 990613_gradedralnage.dwg i r Young & Young \ / < 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 • \\ / \ /// \ 631-727-2303a Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor \ Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer „ 1,02 Robert C. Tast, Architect Ronald E. Pfuhl, Landscape Architect �0�/ \ \ \ / / 07 1 \ 246 DCG. 12•� � l l // \ � � \\ / 12,DEC. .011 / \ q.lo \ i - - _ Vii' h' Oma, \ Y• 18"HERR IZ'DEG. / 1,.34 / \ \ \ c O•�\`CJ\��Y/ \ \ b + IZ" D'tG ,.OI ,/ \ /O \\ Te, \ r / /\ 0'C �\ y�� \ l ` /�. "DEC. 136"TWIN DEC. \ ♦ \ \ O / V 14.60\ e'OA lo'DEC. O • \ 0� /,� \ 4 � +�. �2"p/{ <",yam �. \ \ I _+ ,/ • '/ ` �•�\V \` ,�\ \ 2)\IO'OAK 'DEG.*If 5 I \ �3 �j� \ - C O / \ �Q J ac'�S 'f✓ +/ 8'DEC. I + .�. `- -" -\ /� \ J / ` �, 15.30 / I +' 8"CHERRY / 0"DEG. / \ \ / o / _1- 12.231 1,31 a"DEC. \\ \ /, I / \� i& \\ i 18" / 18.44 1/ �p/,��. TWIN CHERRY 0 / 1 TH 0 a�� /�\\v \ 4i 15.68 � s o �Qrr^^ 80 > \ / \ (3)-I•GHE R �� \\ >\ EC 4DEG. \ OiA 0"DEC. ` ,' \v I 24'DCG. � dd / V V �\i W l ♦ ,.Ib 12"DEC. 12"GHERR / Y J� IDDEC.\\./•I'CHERRY `I 0" % \ `\ _ - 6,64 O g / • / / �N n,•� // + O +/ + 90 GHERR ' / +. + + // \ \ \ \ `\ 1 a \\ ,.41 g\ba \(Z 12"GHERR ' / q 95 12• I 10"CHERRY II 8"D / \ \\ \\ ♦ q 6/ 6./q �� / / / I 2`CHERRY I 8"DEC. 6.21 < r\ \ 7 20.48 \ / + 16.80 I 15.51 ` \ ' / \ I , y / �jq / / pi o� , 11 R� 1 6 +1.50 V b.8�. 9 1 (4)-10"CHERRY C.!)-IZ'CEDAR \\\ Sr a� 10"CEDAR •GHERR I GED / + + T'\0 ��` �/�,�{G n48 n.ls / + 5.50 \ � n of o `V + I(3) -8 CHERRY \- // b S/3� ZO 1"CEDAR V (\��/�� /// / p \ I'CEDAR / 10' _ 10'CHERRY 12"CHERRY / ` �� ,�\✓ 11.68 \ I 12.C+ERRY Cr- 121, / N \ I 0"CHERRY I2"CHERRY / GAR \ i 6P 1492 I 2" \ \, / / IO.q, / 10' / e'CEDAR 14.11 / / / e"CHERRY 2 8"CEDAR 10"GE[7F.R 6.26 .50 `,` // (9�Z'GCDAR / / 0'CEDAR '� + I \ 0� 8"CEDAR \ \ 0� \�\ / / / 12'CHERRY q2 //6.00 \\ \\ S.ISq9. \ '0 12, / 12'GNERRY + 10" HERRY 14.12 // � \ \` 4.14 ` / / �, / /+ 1 x + 4.65 ` \d, / + W-12"CEDAR / 1 I ��,\ / 12,C \ TH#4 / /+ �2�s l / \ x� / / 5.83 2 CHERRY \ / / \ x / \ \ \ 10 / \ / 12" / 12.46 // / � / / \x�x / + // / / / 7`.q, TH#3 x / 1;9 p `\ (2) 2"CHERRY + 10" + 13.81 \ / .88 \ / ^ / +\ 5.bq ` 11.51 12 \ / /+/ \` / / � \\ / + �� + 4.67 \ \ / /`b // -� ,\ /+// // \ / / \ / \+ "CHERRY V+�6.04 \ \ \ 16.22 �+ 0 -10"CEDAR - 10"C \\ I + 5.41 + 10"CHERRY 551 �y \ I I I �\ 12"CEDAR / //// \ \ -'40 / + C \ < \O \ \ / / \ I c / \\ + 4.56 /^\ / \\ /9 / \ + j8.52'//1.2 \ \ )/r1-"(V/ II.00 .'J �� « 1802 \ � 11.54 1 q.11 \ I \ 12' .45 V'��. 12"CEDAR + 11.50 12"DEC. \ \ // + \ \ \ / `��v`\, / \�•9 I \+ \ \ \ I I.0'r- =✓ 0,45 I \ \ 12 // \ \ / \ o \ \ /> 1 /\�/ \ +\ \\\ \�/ /�s�11.21 / � / // I \ + // \\ / / 814.38 1 \ \ \ J 12'CEDAR / + \\ \\ / / / O �� \+ / TH#2 .41 / I I \ + 5.11 \ / / / / / + 6.1, \ \ ` I2 + \ \ 6.44 / �a / / � - - + / 11.31 5.02 +\ / '� / / ' • I. 6.18 12. !' + \J.Ib %'' // / + 11-76?�Z,I.O 807 t�11. \\ �6v \+ 5.50 / btn 't •� g�•��t \`� �\/ r \\ / / \ / , / � s0 // 2.51 / /�+ J / / // / // r+er��°I� \ °'o�ISITE DATA Ig + 56q / TOTAL AREA - 18.'1115 ACRES 9 i q.3d 8.11 / / T� i + \ \ � + - \�\ \\ 'A� // / cy+ • ZONING USE DISTRICT = MARINE II (MII) DISTRICT / b+ J \. 6.88 \ \ \ \0 • DAR i + 3.42 / • \ \ / ' <\+ VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. la2cl) 1 l - o \ \ / \ �'/QQ� k' ° BENCH MARK - MONUMENT X325 8.05 / x \ I 1 CO 0 + \ ELEVATION 16.05 < / ,m0 ------ ----------�\ / / 0 1.00 + 6.81 6.,5 ^ �p I x / I 5.31 2.48 jig V �S + 10.64% --_ (2)-10'CEDAR / 0 . � l0`t' I II \ 10.61 + `- ''/ '�- _ �` I \� Y O� ��' ► v `� 6451 I� - �:' \ 1.4"1 1 x.33 (0Qj(0 � � V, \ •` \ 6 ' "'74: ' 4:, \ // \�`� �` 5.21 �.,� \ '� 1 �. I % J �• 10 \� I \\`\ /\/ / �\ �\ O'CEDAR +\1.52 t I\ � 0 '`O 5.12 ry J� ph Jl ( / I 11 ^� q °o'p� 1� /"7.172 \\ 1.66 �`�\� \\`� + 692 �! r� 3.�q I ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION / I \�'� / \ `\ 1•�s.�`` \+ S�� \ � // I / + 3.61 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER SUPPLY(5) AND/OR \ / \\ \\ `��R� �� y 1.02 �' \ p + l.o \ / SEWAGE DISPOSAL SY5TEM(S) FOR THIS PROJECT WERE "h' +�+ DESIGNED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. BASED UPON A f m CAREFUL AND THOROUGH STUDY OF THE SOIL, SITE AND 4 \ ' 5.88 / GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS, ALL LOTS, AS PROPOS \`•.<, �sl'� / \\\ \\� \� e"CEDAR + ?p/' c� 6.41 \ / O CONFORM TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTM 1.04 .t, \ \ + 8 \\ \ \ \ \\ \I / �`� \ SERVICES CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN EF �1. + 22 \ 5.31 / ry DATE. .`� �P y ig�h 88 3q6.52 b 4.86 6.11 \ / 5.81 / �� ^�j Ci• `16/0` Qf 49 p � 6.80 •pc+� � � jar. s ,d � � 2••f:��rr. ��\ '' ��` '�•..+ �. � r ~ ter.`•%:•'\.;`,,f,=+'� --ti � ��Q + 6�3 I / 1' Q'�� HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 458Q3n 6.13 \ '\ �j \ \ ' + 6.8 \ L\1 \ 9 \ / / ' v \ \ `\ `\ // �' b.q ZZTT �� 9° ) 6.83 / i THOMAS G. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. NO. 61483 \N� 6.11 ° •.0 � S�6 � 2q � / �� A� �9 / / + 3.65 6.54 >+ \ \ L � � Y 6.35 '� bs°.2 \1/./ - �/ Q 5UR\/EYOR'5 CERTIFICATION I \ •` \� .�',/ `\ // \0A' �- \ .-•! Qr� ' \ # / �\ \�U + q 6.16 + 6.4 �0 6Za • THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY AND / / q, O � TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYS MADE BY U5. 6 35 Q- ,��` A /b.Oq - 3.83 `� tY / /n tea'•\ \ \� � //�, �.(�GYJ�O. \\ /' 1.86 � 60 9� / mry� V 5.35 �, �: / o' 6.22 /'/ 6.25 6.5., / 32A�,,w1 y` NEIN 24 5sl A� ap Y 0 P` O + s.18 \ G� A + .08 6.20 ,SO �\�r 17 �' \ \ 00 5.44 \\ ®� "S HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45813 l�0 ) a I � O/ 6.45 C , \ ♦ \ 3 6.15 { \ e' O 6.18 t(!� fit' V F` + 4.64 6 1 :OI �14 6.6"1 1.12 4.10 `R / 4.31 ' /• I O'`�' b.bb \ 6.6499. `0 HOLLISTIG HEALTH INSITUTE + 6.31 a'� �o� \� \ \ \ ,.• + 4.48 \ ,.,2g� O i -DO LTD. _ +��, At East Marlon Town of Southold EARTH rfz+6.53 _ `+ 1 `\� 1.52 4' �Q 4 ) + Suffolk County, New York C� + ,.23 \ �Z` 4.3 + \ B 4.0 '�, o� o County Tax Map District 1000 Section 38 Block 0-1 Lot -1.1 \ \ , 4�6 EX51 TI NG GOND I TI ON5 MAi� \ � .os 006 fflab MAP PREPARED MAY. 5, 2003 SCALE: I"=40' 7 Q MONUMENT SET C MONUMENT FOUND STAKE SET A- STAKE FOUND _ JOB NO. 1111-0613 OF 3 DWG. 110613_110'733_100s e I - PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 16, 2006 BY HAND Southold Town Trustees 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the following for the above referenced matter: 1. Three color elevation drawings If you have any questions,or need anything else,please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you. Very truly yours, �Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. MAR 1 6 2006 ....�_ �� . .■ ._.■■9i... - ■�N■_NNIS�N_��N_NI•N.�. �■! •�!■1■�NIN� ■■..___N�N�NI•N�NI• i r• :rr an Somali Mwin OWN INS mom mmmmmw 111MEN ongol -__ ________Nr■i �� -�"I low 111111111111111111 1,1111 i r ■ ■ �� __�N��NI•��li • ■ r i NONE ■■1.■ ■.■� ■!��■ .�■1 ■■■■■tr:<.... ■ 1 ■1 i ■w w: ■! ! mom ME r■■t■UNION 1!0"+1100101001 1��111111111 __rNur1 11111lpill, r1N1•N�NI•N�NI!��NI,N� ■��■1��.�.�1 �1� .!•�.■Nr_'.N■ ! . • �it�9� s gill 11 = :��■�� 1��IIIIII i■ .N s m m• ■i i.9, >�i li�i • . . Alk ARIL - was ow IM1 P::■.■■■9m 'ama_ �N_NN■N_N_��__N■�■A■�(� t41■■■r!■ _ N/•NI•N�N�NN■NII__Nl■. N11 aR.•�r. ■N,, ■ NOON NOON i� Omni III �n - ��■91 ii�l • ' • a • i • • • • - s � r i� w.a S"ss'R -I GLLEM CNA mc 1 ' I I O � 2 � � a 7 � � I _ Ob O ScLqz I I �... USE KEY Ow. '. r -�.�.� TPANBMT MOTH. I I O AAIr O � � lT1KiLE SMTLY RESIDENCE I I fEBTAURMR o MAA a4 4 Oas 4 """'" ° ° SFE PLAN KEY � oFRCE ° a -'1'�i 4 6 3Y1i60L BILDNf'DE9CFFIlON TRMTSENTMOTH. O8 a FE'�fAURAN� dC- HVEUiB>� ROM 0 ♦1 LL D p� O � I�Nci ROOM— OFFICE 1+2 O THEE U TS BOOM ---'-- a d d a s a a. e - TRANSEW MOTH_PHVATE O OA UnNA Dbi1Cit HALL �/ A.L n lilliLlu nO �OEOX MANAfE S FEB)BM p ` O POOL HOUSE 2 f s I h UnM aMup AMo . IO OOVBED GAZEBO 1 1 SffE PLAN 6T GAZEBO G1S SCALE: C3A�03 NOT TO-N--ALE !� O U 4 C-1a o0 CN CN! cq 51 TE DATA a) /' C , d� / / g�o�oh /p ` TOTAL AREA = 18.5"1018 ACRES 0 a * a.o2 \ 01< �!t // \/\ 9iG tF' p.',/ , ♦\ ZONING USE P15TRIOT = MARINE 11 (MIP DISTRICT / • \ / 0� �J rP/ I \ Vlat VERTICAL DATUM = N.6.V. DATUM (M.5,L. a) `t\j / 4< // \ \` BENCH MARK - N.G.V.D. N.S.G.G.SJ MONUMENT X325, ELEVATION 16.05 ,Ogg + 0(000C`/ .. ` \ / / ,,'�1 lya� �,� oAii ,� "�� ;;.'•, SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION �' / /� ,�\°�/�Q/ `• of 1 + 01.26 %� �'� 1 \'\ 1 ~V• , �, \ THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING BOUNDARY AND �("4� Q/''�p \\ 'j9 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYS MADE BY US ON MAY 5, 2003. / \ /' , / / \\ � _. � , � 12• 12' 09 ' �L/]�/} .ti�p(si / 9.10 I \ I DEC. I \- I , ,/ \ 'i ♦ \\ rw,`� T ��r E IV DEG. + I. ` ' ,j� \ `J 'O �dPJ �F \� 8,rb c, \,\ ' / gyr \\ y �I( �f4 w I a) / + 17.34 , °� \\ \ , * 6 Is' + 7.01 \ ,� \\ Ui. / \ ' -kf17 - 11; 'tn E ,� O \ 14.60\ ,'''a"O °DEG. 1 96'TWIN DEC. la DEL. 9 \ O ( Q d' \ 0 CJ \ 4 ++ +�'�J p 7 \ \ HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45843 �(j� o O • (` rP os 2)\I0.OAK 1 DEcr If 5 1 9 C4 9 \ \ \ L "• ,/ �° / 1530 �� I e"DEG. 1 + ++\.\ _ 4 0�--\ �p'•`'� \\ t,an�s h Q a"CHERRY I / 1 9'DEG. 9•DEC. •♦ ' J� \\ / \ " .. \ _ O j 1 / \ ( ,•'' \p 1 e•DEC. + 18.44 / �•(\\� � \\ �'` 1 /'' /(9)-19"TN IN CHERRY I , // 1 TH 1 15.68 /./'� 12'DEG. / G \ ♦ \ '' / °� �� I ,'' / 1 ' + 6.46 + 7.14 ' \'\ b.q2 _ \ \ r Lu t I \ �\1 � / * 12.77 / r \ � ,•'' r21-6•DEG. / '\ O X80 1`} �• ` _I / // I \ /,.•� / _J/ IP�-►IXC, �)-I'� !7_1 '�p 8,14 ry 19.46 - + 11.46 ` LLJ // ,/•' `.-/ 1 / + 11.46 ` I"DEG. \ ' \'\ O4 9'DEG. �h ,/' \ 8.18 \� \ ,•� ♦ �' [� �n - �(+' Z / 1 �+ 1 12'GHERR / , 1 1 * 750 ! ��DEG. i/ / \ ,\, /' . /' �� N O Q 0 <- - 1 -}-. ♦ I'GHERR 1 + 7.16 D. 12"DEC. ]G' 0�,, y`, \ \ \ / �.i \` ► p ` , 0� 0�'(` / + 50• Y 1 `Np 1 / 101•DEC. \.e III `��`/ /''' 1 �x + I ' \ e• �/ /,, �\ \ 7•� \.` 7.41 ��' + 3 /, ' / \ / 17.15 12•GHE ' 1 / l + 4A5 I2" lo•CHERRY I \ /' gid 'ti/ �\ \ \ 7.06 / 6.79 a V J u J `` I 2'CHERRY \ b" 6.21 c V' \� \ 4:01f'� / '/ O Z + 20.48 i \ �., + 16.80 1 + I5SI► / / � � I •\ !. � \ ♦ i' �(/ � ++ 1 \ 6 +7.50 \, i� 6,8fy/ 1 ^ T J C/) 113 \\ (9)-12•CEDAR \ v S� 7.06 lL l ) w ..!_ Q LL + I5.g9 / (4)-lo"GHERRr \ G. /' v / , I / \ / ih 7,20�,�'+7S4 q3 7.29 O 110", , 0� l�ft \ / /'' / 1 / / Io•CEDAR \ / , /' ,80 �1.f4 6 F- Z \ Q °t' rOt rQjt \ / . ' / , 12 12'CEDAR +1 7•rt +. 81 ~ V 1-- F- / ' J\�\'`''^^J�\'V ` \�� '' / + 11.45 + 11.15 + 5S0 6.38 ( OI ,S Z w Q (- \\ -a 0 12�Ey•' 1 1 / (SN 8"CHERRY \ /' j �/ O , n / 01 _ OK �• � \ ,''' D"fSEG. ` / I"CEDAR ` ,G� \ Q. /w\ � V = O \ + 20.13 / \\ (\ \0 ,. 1 / 1 1 / I /y C 1 V ID a cn H- 1 / 10 lo'CFERRY 12,CHERRY / I ' � - \ rq�' + .016 17.68 ,' / / 12' \� 1 Q 8 I b"CH, 12"GFfERRY // \. 1' AR / 5.Oq \ / ♦ o' L0 14,-12 , 1 1 1Z' lo• ` 1w 20 , �l !1 5.49 a` * 0.97 '/ / _ a'CEDAR FL�� ,' \ +4134 5112 \ i In O b (y)``1�� ^'' / 9"GEDARo"GEAR B"GFERR( "� , �. , + 6.26 Z01� X . ` / Q \ + w.5a �0�((\0�� / (9�2'GCDAR / ' � e•ceDAR + Ir c RRY `\ ♦ rrl 64 I I `Q �I \ / I - \ °'� � .� \ ,''/, // + 15.96 � �' �' / � `•\ \\ Q f 1 i-•-• 01}0 \ \ /,/' 1 / - -./ B,GED 9' r •\ \ t.J Z 0 \ 19.41 `\ 1832 + 18.84 / / / // e•CHERRY 1 01Y -b oo \\S� \\ Q U / / / + / \< \ Q D cn -� O /.` + 8.89 % , + 1000, + x�(`x / // + 10" HERRY��f +5.73 \♦♦ /.'/ \ �O� 0131 +/ g��%'•' + 1i72 �/// + 12 i \x\xy� // \\ U \ \ / ,' // / / / / I ►`x / +4)65 / ` U + /i'' 12• / I*27 / /-f- / (21-f2'CEDAR + I \x `I // / " U \ / TH#4 / 'j.0 + r '' '^\ \max\ / / 533 12"CHERRY \'\ / C �` `\ _I o \ %\ 19.910110 `'\ / • . \�F' W-121 CEDAR + /// / x�c�k7 TH#3 + 0 �/ 0,, \ / \\ \\ •� IbSa + / // / P\ \ Ib'DEC /%/.101 / \ / / x\x\` + (2) 2"CHERRY rC`�I 0 -,) \\ } ,y \ •\ / / � + � \ / / '1'\6.61 13.87 // .88 + \ / \ +% �'\ /// + 1757 lZ // / //+/ \ + ` '\ //\b I // /I // \\ l 1 \� / +\+ "CHERRY %-+) 4•, •\ '� \\ / ♦ 18,22 /%/+ 622 1 40 / \ \ \•♦ v I \/// i ` + 5.9 r \12 10 + 10.85 ` (9)-10"CEDAR 10"e, \ \ \\ t Q 10, \ /' + 5.47 \ 12"CEDAR \+ / /;0, � ` / % \ �+ / \` +9102 \ ,� \'\ / ;J • �3s2�/ / ` \ /// `00 � J \c •� / . 4.56 / \ \ I / ( * 721 l �•�5`I�+ 1134 \ �,� +�/tiIZ' �5 / \\ / �. \ 12'CEDAR \ / \: / \ + 11.80 / // / / / I + b. q \+ ` �\ \\ /�* 855/// // / \ �''' I +� 1 / \\ „( ♦\ \ 17.50 12"DEG. / ` \ / / / ) ' I \`- / \ ` \ "�� \'\.♦ ` a/� + \ \ \\ / / /+`0 - ✓ // // /'+ C \ \` \ \ / + jf5 11.27 / �' I I \ \+ \ / 4.5 \ ` \ / \' \ / / / / <' I + 5.84 p \ \ + \ 1 13"CEDAR / / + \�` \ / / / / �� •\ I 1 \ +6.03 \+ i' / TH#2 J / /�\ \ / / // �• -- --, \ + 5.11 �•� + / \ '\ \ ftp \ * \•\ / / 12 �+ \ + 6.44 / / // �.� -- - .! 6.03 \ \`+ // \ \ \•\ \/ // 11.99 / / / ,1 \+ r y,,-\ %631 .. -$� 4 ' 2.9511 52.71' 2.12 0 B5a/3 \+ // // // �'♦,\ + 6.46 /' � 227 + I. G, / / 0) \ \ \.` x�6 \ \\ Is• / \ n.lb / / / / \ /,.i'' 4 •J�►22,�.G Stfrlb'4e'e atr `t 5. �Y ,�/ 1 \ i / / 1} ,�K\ OGjQ 0� \ \ o \ / / / / / + 7,301 // le f� `, \ \ 9 + + / �6 \ 3�L6 /�, X1'1.12 9 •/ld�' �\ irr + / \ !. i % 6 a \00 0(\ �{\� b0�,\' \\ !\ •j, + \ // / \'y + / // / low .?jIvir 31� ,710t \ 1 \ + 5.015 / + 010 t\� / tiY \ �G0 �°A\��/ \1G`80 \\/, + 12.51 / / / / / 06. b°I9DOLPHIN ri► + I'�♦�88 + V \ / 0 / )A / / / / g 1 + % a ' \ 15.2-1 � ` /` / � / ! I CLUSTER s ♦ - I + 5.bq OV \ o ` x 9,,\\ / \ / I �-1 36 8.79fN '83 DOLPHIN (5.9)/001 1000 CLUSTER n _ r V / .\ •,\ \,, .\ / 0, 'ti\ + 7.7Q + 7.95 1 � `�� 3 J�w 6.88 \'\ ' � All I\ � + / / 1 (1 a? ��` - -1.46 7r 6.76 3.42 \ •.\ ''�' \ 4J52 / // `i`\ / ./ 5S2 (11.41 J P7.q) � 12• I + ,B/e e.tS5 / (TS) x \ \ 1 / `' i cu�� } / \ �. 0.05 o P�+ / late, 113?J \� *c'�' Y,�• �\ Cpj;0 �. +<� / v /�.7Bp Q� } �ti x +5.15 % / / �Na�`/ rD ��Al no.o) (oi.7) ��G \7J� '`�\ \ * 7 ( osFREr r+Esr/ / \ ` wb /---------------- ,-- 0 / 119.0) 0Ole � 0�iy \!"' I / 1 + + v/ \ / �4 \ I'' ' 7AG * 6.81 6.75 / (0 Grp V r +4• 4 I % 5.91 /+ V ♦"� 10.6�� g /C 1 \ \ 10.61 + / \`S� _ �`'//�� (21-10•CEDAR + 101, \�0�(\� l6 9) 5 /�_-_j / (12.01) p�0�- 4 I WETLANDS LINE AS DALINEATED BY I i / 14 / 7.47 09.9) ►�� +I * 6 I COASTAL ENVIRONMENITAL +l LOGATEP BY I s3 YOUNG 4 YOUNG ON 8/,26/03 5.21 (12.7) It I/ awl lo I �\ e•ct9AR \ 7.52 1 !19.41 (12.1) " h 5.72 +3.01 \�` + 7.92 \\ « 7.66 �y / \\ ♦\ ��` + 7�q5, \ 6.12 C� \ 119 ) off' / /' �ck 15.36 \•\ / \ � + 7.02 (q.b) /F7.0,9/ / / ' / / 3 2 ` / NO r/ O lll.7) r4 . 1�1 + 1 / I / / a('o,I \ \ \ 0.25 \� ♦ / , ryo• \ (12.J + _ -,-,-,-,-,_.--- �_. / \\ \ x \\ ♦ ♦ 7. 7-+ 20/ GL- / + 5.88 \\� 8 \\ 10 / ♦♦;\ \♦♦ \\ / '1.04 + 22 \I." 00 f By51 p \\ ♦ ` 8"CEDAR + / 4.04 8.33\ \ \`♦ `\ 7. + �.\ \ I \ ♦ ♦\ 1 q ?� 352 b (IIAI +1.6+1.59 +158 / 1 N `\J ^ �'>a •�' Oi 899 ` 1 ♦ `\ ♦ I / ` C�p tcK, 4.86 (12.7) ICI ° \ % / + n b'\ 69 164+1.60+ 7.99 _p\V �Q-\\ �4 `'\ `\ ♦♦ / j �'j \ (q 9) (9.9) ° 43 @ +I.q3 1.72+a' 1 % 2.60 / !� a� Cj pi 't' ♦ \ / 6.80 (14.4) . 1 Y�1_ +2.08 / / ya tz 6.78 'Y 2 3�. +3S 8.5 ✓ + \ `\ ♦ / / CT \ �S ° 69 +9.Iq 1 w� O •ate �' \ \'\ \ ♦ + 6.01 \ + 6.67 % + / T \ Z� p0 primo +IA5 2.00+ +3.45,3.62 + / // / � co 0 U R.O 8.19 ♦ 653 \ (12S) 0 3.33 1 'd ` ` \ + '`Y, \'\ `\ `\ % % +Cy 6.15 6.9 Q) \ (9.8) (8.0) .�\�8 2.01 // % �V� ♦ ♦ / / 2.25 / Zi ` \� \ \''\ ` �' \ \ \\♦ / ' O \ ° �\.OP rP / 6.71 6.501 428 u 320+3.24 1 + 6.83 / j / +3.17 % l/) / �1 � �' rw \ \ + * �` \ \\ ♦ \X- .54 �Cs96 2q (10.0) // t 2.76+3.014 \ \ \ ♦ \� / 6.54 !� �. 4.6 L94++ 92 \ '\ ♦ �' '\ \ � _ �� / Ai, 9 +(q.41 1 5.60 x,0{. 6 4.05 / j / j °fY / �Qy \ ''\ \ `•\ `\ \ '�l' ,y�. �.- ,°ry+2.I. �' '�`r 4 6.35 / / / / V 1� y �' b.bo 63 as 12 \� + a ,� 6,16 ,' + 6.4 303 85 tj i 4.4 +0 af a�� TI�#I / ��¢\ + 1.9 Y9 �' 1s�2. / + �Y O M ,�R'•1�`h Cz 6.q `'\�: `•\ I6 85 ``\/Q 6.97 5.55 a�,12��6 ' o ,S'' / `i` °' °' 6.oa 86 701 iso�Q 1.72 't3 0 „ GG /// 9 '� \ \ \ %'\ ' �n �i� \ .54 ,' 2.43 +1,541.48+ �. .40 +3.18 l� p� Q �' 9� \ \ `'\ // \ // rJ 1 \ 5.95 /' �� 22 / ��0 9� 0S. 'tij,. 5.Is \,/ 6.2/�j,\ 6.25 *Ci 6.5� / ,•' \�� +1.42 1.98 2AI h 9,ti OC O�/G \\ \ \\' 'SI \ + '5.�' \ 6 \/ (p j/ 3�a�� 2,9 + // / O Q; o p� \ O !� 1. 4F 24 � / / p �� \ \ \\ + \ \ O, . S, 03� r 3.56 1.66 a / O O 1�i, \''\ at !' 6P/," 6.41 ( 6 / i r 1.42+ + 3.51 V + .08 �.� 6,20 /1- C, 3 2q f��y�, .� // Q n yC \ \ \ \ \ ( ,� A7 ,• / �\ o V / !1<16 � \ Q \\ /' / �b ,' B x5.44 + \\ \'\\ ® � 6.45 \'\ /.� \ (1.0) / C 6Jq `'•\ `\ + e 'C vQ\ dC1634 ,4^ O cD 0 5> LO 'yi \,\ 4.88 �' + \'\ \1 6.18 k�p�•'�(1*C Q/s' Q\� / �("'••'1� + '•\ \.\ •% 4.64 '\ 1 ,.• 6. �s /' .,� ro p� "\ 4.9� \ 1 �% 'J\, 01.71 �6?4 /'' 39 / DOLPHIN � \fy'\ \ 4.8 + \ �'/ O , ,15'1 / CLUSTER Z + \`/ I 6.67 �' d�.8 21 j/72 �fi3 // 4.10 REMAINS OF \ / \'\ I j�Q'' \ j F, 6.64 \ 7; app\9 .47/�3``-� // � (2 0)<A BULKHEAD O 8E REMOVED) W O O 6.3-1 a' h�Q /�/"S!�'O7 �0 I 4.48 o n / \6. 01�" / ` (12) \ �•( \ /35 6' ±.'5.00 _STH Ew. 6.53 C, / / \ \``7" �■ \ � x\ 152 \+ 7.49 / ♦ia \ 7.40 } \ \ ® I. \ / + 1.23 // (4'I) DOLPHIN \, } O ' , =O 4.0�\ ` '' + CLUSTER `T- m to \ ,4 ` n \ \\ 4.1 + 45 // 0 cD + 7.44 Ate / '� r � Z Oce C14 (0 06 // C1.1) 0 LO DRAWING NO.: AMk .b + J - a ZowU) L'pooYww� QQ�W wQLJWL �O,~OQ v W W W W W W W W W W W W V O W _1 LL W a- v v W W W W W W W W W W <> �� JU)=�LL SoY-(n W W W W \W W W W W W W W�7_ZF QZ~W OU) LL QS 6I _ .. - - .. - - 6_1 t�1'1 - "�_r1{i_�..__-.- S y•�._.._._...._,._-_-_1;.;_S-I_.-_t_...I..__.._-.__„.I_.-_.1,___.I_il\.l-_"_"�_".�t-['."__'-4._:-L'#,...._.-_—i—-_—Ii� �;{I. .":.:,_-,. - _:--- :,.... OPOSE„D,. , � .XI TI B D5////JGWWWWWWWi4�.9WWWWWWWO'�'��WWWWWWU\$O`WWWWWWWWWI�T'F V y�o��WWOWWWWWW R��'�A�WWWWWWW_/[`��WWW znu-Vw,�QWW WW/D/'w'/W-W /WW��-WO--WWW©W-W�_[W�'W.-Wn-_'/woO_��-W_znFW•,_,<�W�,W�,<d�W•Ws®�-`?,�,�'�4 i.`/ Wj--• 6�'mL1��.''IE<4/hP�i►$0'Y/VV2 a��11��►�'�tWW)n'z�:-,��i��//1WWW�A�r_a W��isjw`�WWW W Q'�'z W,4WWWW-{'ti@�9WWWWWWWf,�-'WWWWWWW+`!�WWWWWWWWfi��b��WWWWW's\,�'��WWWWWWW��►��-'\'WWW WWW—�WWWWWWWW--�--WWWWWWW- II�L�WWWWWWWWW,_ISI-WWWWWWWW r WWWWWWWWWWW- WWWWWWWWW`-WWWWWWWWWW-\ /iWWWWWWWWWWW7WI\ a WWWWWWWWW �WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Y\ 10WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW\E�� \�'W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW-/ X bbR5WWWWWWWWWWWWWW 1W 4II P WWWWWWWWUWWWW 'R '7WWWWWWWWWWWWA. 5PWWWWWWWWWWW9c WWWWWWWWWW\WWWWW WWWWWWWWWW \WWWWWWWWWW '1WWWWWWWWW �WWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWJ WWWWWWWW• ;WWWWWWY WWWWW8 Y,S {J1 LoUJa>l)M NW Yc�iJ t Fr C) �> 4�QAOZw1S\� n � 3mW Oo J �VUU'0OQ3 >- o3 ` Lij Ld W�QVmQ0J DASHED LINE INDICATES m �=Ll_ v >Zv°/ - 0Q vYOZ=t�Z .0 W+ z cnZZEXTENTS OF EXISTING WWWWWW 0-0 frpOQZW FWtI. ._ BUILDING � Q Z ZN Q m[Ifui 0� 00UUW0Z _jW _W 0= cf)=) fW -1 ui MAX.BLDG.HGHT. w Z w oaf TONING c� Q Q Q Qz oo WEL. +45D8' J ROOF DECK _.1-1111 . SECOND FLOOR TO WATERNE EL. +31-08' 0 W W W W 1-1H I [j 6142' PROPOSED BLDG TO WATER LINE FLOOR W W W W W W W W W W W W W W EL. +25,08 PROPOSED PATIO ELEV 1008' D '41 5 ELEV: 1.08' V N m GARDINERS BAY OCID Z$TIE LINE ALONGFINISHED GRADE W WW WW UU m APPROX. HIGHV W WW ELEV: 450 GROUND LOWATER LINE a XT6NDSCAPIN5T® WWW - L4 EL. 410-08' W Z E W . W W W W R€MAN W W W NIGH WATER MARK W W W W W W W W W W z o 1EL +I24 W W W W W W W W W W W O MEAN WATER LINE LZ V W W W EXISTING RADE EL. -066, MQLuW g W W W W W W � W W W W W WJ WO � = QCo U D N NEWROCK REVETMENT W0W V\ Z VWWWWWWWW W W W rBUILDING SECTION WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW= W W W W W W 14�4.1SCALE: 1/16' I'-0' W W W W W W W W W W W MV UNJ WETLA HIGH WATER MARK W Ln V ) - W *r- -4 < W W N W W W W W WL W Wco w LKEAU4005 B W W W W W W W W W W LANDWARD LIMIT OF WETLANDS AS FLAGGED BY JEFFREY L. SEEMAN, R.E.M. OF 22'E 1ENN375210V COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Oq Q AUG. 12, 2003 � J M1NUMENT. TYPICAL ?L Nm00 nomU) OD BULKHEAD1DZo ' -0' FLOATING DOCK 56-0' 1 O OPTION (SLIP 1) (SLIP 2) LIP Id) PRIVATE MARINA u (SLIP 3) (SLIP 11) W (SLIP 4) (SLIP 12) AREA -�' =80.FT. DW FLOAfiIN6 OCK P 5) (SLI15)ORTSLI /LAkNNtM2 ACRES OPTICN - 8'x150' _- (SLI14)(SLIPN NEW OGK zPILINGS RAMP, 4'-O"H p(SLIP -7) (SLIP 15) RETAININ WALL NATURAL W */E ATI W2 AREAW 0 W Uu Z � OU 6ARD N SGULP RE _jORAMP UP—/ WOUT7 T*RRW o' W WRtTAININ or, co WQf WALLW — co O I W W N LOADING DOCK O o I SPACES SP S FIRE Moo HYDRANT m =3 SEIBACK LIVE I]-]-- - ES X PA E X v0 30'-0' m ' ' Lo PARKING c ' \ AREA iESTAURAN L coo ENTRY C m FENCE EDGE Z mW-4 HIGH WATER MARK 04 N co 0 Ta PARTIAL SITE PLAN 0to K�2 ROCK DRAWING NO.:G � a-4.3 SCALE: 1'=40'-O' ONE-RR w z GUIDE RAIL � BENCH MARK NAIL SET IN POLE ELEV. = '7.00 Aa-4.3 o�OSpFFO(,�coG -_ ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE �� '�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK Cz - P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR,OF VITAL STATISTICS 0-1 Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER ® Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER y'dJpl �aO� Tele e-( -� 00 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER s t- d� h o L et , t �I 4JUK' OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLEI3 j4 2001 v J�CU� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OC So d}of 1�steel APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECOR INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer) . One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SEC N I. (Department or Officer, if known, that has the informairorw you are requesting. ) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information. ) Signature of plicant: Printed Name Address: 4 j Y Mailing Address (if(d.iifferent from above) Telephone Number: C-7--12' ,--;z-21Y(3 Date: [ l APPROVED [ I APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* �� J Elisabeth A. Neville , Freedom of Information Officer * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. James F.King,President ��OF S0!/Tyo Town Hall Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President ,`O �� 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A. Dickerson Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen G Q Bob Ghosio,Jr. �� O Telephone(631) 765-1892 �y C4UNTYFax(631)765-6641,� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Building Dept. FROM: James F. King, Presiden Board of Trustees DATE: June 13, 2007 RE: Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#38-7-7.1 Please be advised that the Board of Trustees inspected the above-referenced property and will not require the property owner to obtain a permit for the activities being conducted under the supervision of the Dept. of Environmental Conservation's spill team. Our Board, however, recommends that the open cesspool located on the south side of the dilapidated building be covered and the fence on the east side of the southerly end of Shipyard Lane be repaired, for safety purposes. This is not a determination from any other agency. ` COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GILBERT ANDERSON,P.E. LOUIS CALDERONE CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Septemger 29;2006- ,.. _;, ,� Crr� •.�_ �� ,,� ISI' €�A� Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 T - Loij :t Southold,N. Y. 11971-0957 t L.--, Attn: Jerilyn Woodhouse - Re: 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Laa lein Gaia Holistic Circle,Oki-Do Ltd. " SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road and subsequently not under our jurisdiction,a permit from this Department is not required. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. Chief Engineer By: M. Paul Campagnol WH:MPC:In Director of Highway Planning&Permits SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (631)852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE 0 YAPHANK,N.Y 1 1980 0 FAX(631)852-4150 #� r m i� h !. ��dip��i W qui •, , IS11101wulipupQ u Y,S V. 1 jr- I .rt �.•.. ' � .'may _'i'..-�.. s,. � r -_ -� _ . 4 1 _ . jaw- AM, f . . . . . . .'If1Edd1(Sf idlfltlUf1f1f1fFf�F 6V FIE➢!1°iF t,IE lfl.�ilAf .. -. r s o IfJdllifJfll}Fl FIf1UFJiliA£if1t3FJQt1[11ital7(.IULIffE1f1i1tiUtIGUL.It1U0f.ILtUl1ULlUlif if 11l6�11f1Gt1t1t1Ef611iUt1uUfliltl Jlti liitlt ttu aC. cf xr'f"( �q ` f(,it:'t ( ( ��a' Ater ItoE t >f>l� at�i f,cant.arat�fti�Muxu�cu9t,i��xaruu�f�Fy�t�r� in��fil�I�t r��,�Wirt'�t,(it��x�fir�t,�wat�ly?-) ,W,�t' w�(r VIII piolmq-Vt�- Ca3-S-/ kr :7 1ao,=t1-t-7,L- 61 1 71 0 0 :Iltr 7-7 'r y-owu 4z v �q -QF� F/c,)4o,7 pc � , �CL-a cr `titT3, o- �7 va -41 ler7r� ilii ?- iii 3, A i I I F, f I 1 .3 141111141-114 H N L A A A iii Ci i Ci F f, i A J� i o fir, L!, I! P F. I P,-1 1 7 7 Fir, �i i Ph n T n F I d t,1 .v IL d W 44 41 , $40 tv, 41 c ry 't� Q w NN Ili r I irk S". f4ilksoi s= r *4 fa ; is , 8 •.` -.� .,F .' # f s#` fief �f e .. A r . Y r r k4L n ` 4 �w» i prepared by the New York State Department of >nservation. It was financed, In part, through a grant States Department of Commerce, National oceanic LEGEND Administration, under the Coastal zone Management COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA CLASSIFICATIONS COPIES O F COASTAL ER0SI0N HAZARD AREA M 3 amended. NEW YORK g T A T 17 n 17 0 A O T u r Ki T n r r KI %I I n n L ,`�f`;'n ., �' ,�;�' � , �'� �� r :.� - �ri.'.-.. I. �. - �_... - -•� ��. _ �t,.. �� eq�,; t� �� * S� f �;; � , . a'3j f� � I r. � { _. :j ... .[ .:: :y ,,� .b ,�� .�� .. � s r `''�.4. ► �i�. �} .� ., �� _ � ,' .. r k _ � i, far -s'�.h a �•. r r'� ' ' �a .. � � [ Y ( t �.' _ � ; � � �� C. f� r r--� ` � Y •�� 1�� / .. � — � _ - .o i t A r f'' "' " .,w sr._. i r 77 - K„ James F.King,President �� sooTown Hall . Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President h0 y 53095 Route 25 Peggy A.Dickerson P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen G Q Telephone(631)765-1892 °lif'COU '� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: � ' ((� j UC� I Y1,t S ice D--S rt c,-h"j Name of Applicant:' G S LA K o �G 415r- y Name of Agent: �� M o��e, <SS Property Location: SCTM# & Street ,?8 3S Brief Description of proposed acc�tiio,,n:( � �� eX 5 1 nn 6'.A AA-A)s QL) ((2t j(� qe 1K.V,,f \ 3 �..�-�l I J ' K�. 1 "`�L I�i W /our t o "t• e _/L.S •Idl.r/1�j.t ��ce S'FeL ( �u1��4 in (o�SiyJ J Type of area to be impacted: ✓_Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland _Sound Front Bay Front Distance of proposed work to edge of above: (31' Part of Town Cpde pro poy�ed work falls under: _Chapt.0 _V Chapt.�'f_other \A� Iw�.k X5 )I I C'Da3+Cf 1 ea)s�Orj Type of Application: _Wetland_Coastal Erosion_Amendment_Administrative _Emergency Info needed: we4-lanA Ilhe ani, M R ill •>n SNy t/e� Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: _J.King _J.Doherty_P.Dickerson D. Bergen Other: Mailed/Faxed to: Date: 1113!0 Comments of Environmental Technician: S M 0- k6k Ike- PAW a(,, rh, 6oa-q un s bwr((cr�e Int('A o,j W+N S- 050-S M, , :- m Usk e k -I-re S,AI4 Lj a4cc- rue IeA4 l I he rn 6CAS"O 6111ll'V. n� tea( �4.ore 1W (4, ree� Ems, e Ir1,{s4ze �1�rc+,o� Is I b() - 1 rn,A LAe4 O� The ac Pew land Wrn,a C L'c o 1 n me,9 6W�e r cleans -v Gni b,f 6 ,_Q o( 11,_ 7 pne nil �1u r 1 rbdz r c� s l� ? arc.vl o� ThIL I�r 61�/-� Shy I I� ii - - MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OF so P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �� Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS y� Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON 'Ol (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND '�Comlu�, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 76 5-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 i;— PLANNING BOARD OFFICE 1 �; s "V/ E ,F�r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOV 2 2006 AGENDA Special Meeting November 6, 2006 4:30 p.m. SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Adoption of Final Scope Gala Holistic Circle: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on an 18.7-acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o NYS Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane, known as 2835 Shipyard Lane, in East Marion. SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. : 1)084 THIS INDENTURE, made the cg%016 day of October ,nineteen hundred and eighty—six BETWEEN Tosca Holding & Realty Corp., a corporation organized and existing by virtue of the business corporation law of the State of New York, and in the course of its, winding up pursuant to dissolution; and having an office located at 16 WEST 46th Street, New York, N.Y. r- party of the first part, and Anthony Scarmato, residing at Bay Avenue, iEas,t Marion, New York, 11!939 Nov - 8 2oo6 LOT SECTION BLOCK _ . ., 1� �3�,�� par �� .,1.�! L-.�.`�J 21 cil� WI , thalathe parry of die fust lrt, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with *the buildings and improvements thereon ct dsit re, i lying anti h igg at East Marion, Town of South[old, Suffolk County, a � off, New York, being nore part cularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly side of Existing Farad distance South 74 degrees 22 minutes 50 seconds West 58.88 feet when measured along the southerly side of Existing Road from a monument situate at the corner 1 I formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Existing Road with the southior-sterly side of Bay Avenue, said point of beginning being where the nc,:c-Lawesterly lime of the hereinafter d6fribed premises and the southwesterly line of land now or formerly of Mandaro intersects said sutherly side of tti1 "' Existing Road; running thence South 35 degrees 35 minutes East along said southwesterly line of land now or formerly of Mandaro, 58.19 feet to a monument; thence South 16 degrees 28 minutes East and along said land now or formerly of Mandaro 42.75 feet to a monument; thence: South 35 degrees 35 minutes East still along said land now or formerly Mandaro and passing thru a monument 115.00 feet to the oridnary high water mark of Peconic D 3/o 0 Bay or Orient Harbor; thence southwesterly along the ordinary high water mark of Peconic Bay or Orient Harbor on a tie line course and distance of l� p 0 South 42 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds West 119.00 feet; thence North 0 0 9 6 a 45 degrees 07 minutes West along 176.83 feet to a monument on the south- easterly side of Existing Road; thence northeasterly and northerly and easterly along the southeasterly, easterly and southerly side of Existing Road the following three courses and distances: (1) North 16 degrees'10 minutes East 116.87 feet; (2) North 46 degrees 50 minutes East 30.30 feet; (3) North 72 degrees 24 minutes 50 seconds East 39.80 feet to the monument at the point or place of BEGINNING. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second pan forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,'in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same fust to the payment of the cost of the'improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shallbe construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRPSCNCE or.: f i i,ten` ^ r: By: I ii Tosca y Corp. F�''�.., rr-:ULA� 987 M. 3290 JUL[ME A. KINSELLA $ RECORDW OUL 15 19011 Clerk of Suffolk County —a-1 a w;r. Ind;r;dual at COlPOfaflOn. .111 if SVC9{ IF0� IUS HLUMOL14-, .. . .. 29 1 I 3Gaudard.N.Y.B.T.U. Foran 8007 I Bargain k sale deed,ulgl covenant'_ grantor's acts 'Ind.or Corp. �Cj CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, inade the 15 th day of March , nineteen hundred and ninety nine BETWEEN' Aquafood Properties Limited Partnership 330 South Street Morristown, NJ 07962 DISTRICT SECTION BLOCK LOT party of the first part, and Oki—Do Ltd. One Lincoln Plaza Apt. 24E New York, NY 10023 - - li_ i . NOV - 8 2000 party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the patty of the first part, in consideration of One Million One Hundred Thousand ($1,100,000.00) dollars, lawful money of the United States, ' , , paid by the party of the second part, does lierebylgranttand release unto the party of tile' second part, tine heirs or r y} r f Je Y � successors and assigns of the party of the;secoiid part forever, t , • ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, witfi the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, t '1 lying and being in the East Marion, it tthe Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and further deseri,bed in Schedule A annexed hereto. ,1 , f BEING AND INTENDED to be theysam,, premises as conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated 01/31/9.2\and recorded on 02/04/92 in Liber 11412 Page 103. THE PROPERTY is also known as`:28351Shipyard Lane. 1.1954055 Title.No. MAC-420.14542-SF AMENDED 0110198 SCHEDULE "A" ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, 'situate, lying and being at East Marion Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows; BEGINNING at the intersection of the easterly sideof Shipyard e and the ordinary high water mark of Gardiner's Bay, and from said point beginning; RUNNING THENCE North 230 30' 50" West, along said easterly side of Shipyard Lane, 927.0 feet to a monument and land of Reeves; RUNNING THENCE North 680 09' 00" East, along said last mentioned land of Reeves; and RUNNING THENCE along lands of McKenzie and Gunther,as lark, Geoghegan, gan , Kelley, map Kelley, Gregory and Cherepowicz, 860.0 feet to Lot No entitled, "Map of Marion Manor', Suffolk County File Map No. 2038; RUNNING THENCE South 251 08' 50" East, along the westerly boundary line of said map, 900.0 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Gardiner's Bay; RUNNING THENCE Southwesterly along said ordinary high water mark of Gardiner's Bay as follows: 1, on a curve to the left with a radius of 350.00 feet,a distance 25 feet, a distance off140.00 feet; and 263.79 feet to the to the left a radius of wooden bulkhead 2. on a curve lkhead at he easterly side ioft he dredged basin; RUNNING THENCE along said bulkhead, North 23" 30' 50" West, 125.00 feet; RUNNING THENCE across the dredged basin, South ' 19"r's WeBayst, 55.00 feet to the wooden bulkhead at the ordinary high water mark of Gard RUNNING THENCE along said wooden bulkhead at the ordinary high water mark of Gardiner's Bay, as follows: 1. South 600 06' 21" West, 374.00 feet; and 2. South 830 01' 07" West, 78.50 feet to the point or beginning, said beginning point being the westerly end of a tie line of South 66° 91here herein. West, 885.29 feet from the southerly end of the easterly boundary of premises RUNNING THENCE northerly and still along said ordinary high water mark, 78.5 feet to easterly side of Shipyard Lane, at the point or place of BEGINNING. . 1 e L 1 2 RECE ED RECORDED 1.1954P9055 _ �oa Number of pages IFIL ESTATE TORRENS MAR 2 9 1944 99 MAR 29 PM 4: 48 'EDWARDR ROMAME Serial# TAANS6 TAX C I_ERa% OF BLV74 c SUFFOB COUl"ITY Certificate# OOU Y-•- Prior Ctf.# 34708 Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps 4 FEES Page/Filing Fee ._ Mortgage Amt. Handling 1.Basic Tax TP-584 2.Additional Tax Notation 2 Sub Total EA-52 17(County) Sub Total ` Spec./Assit. Or EA-5217(State) �� Spec./Add. R.P.T.S.A. .yA�, , TOT.MTG.TAX Dual Town Dual County Comm.of Ed. 5 00 �� Held for Apportionment � V Affidavit �+ �1_, �o� * Transfer Tax �Ho fHoi�e motif�q Mansion Tax Certified Copy The property covered by this mortgage is or will be improved by a one or two family Reg.Copy � dwelling only. Sub Total YES or NO Other If NO,see appropriate tax clause on page# GRAND TOTAL of this instrument. S ` Real Property Tax Service Agen4 Verification 6 1 Community Preservation Fund tea' Dist. Section B lock Lot Consideration Arnount $ 1000`oco `• $ V Stamp m0 Q 3p,0 ©9,ao cog/60/ CPF Tax Due Improved 171 FWCEIVED Vacant Land Initi 71 Satisfactions/Discharges/Releases List Property Owners Mailing Ad ress TD U RECORD&RETURN TO: NAR 29 '1994 TD Corn �e- Il0 1 zsv GoN1Mu`mr TD r^ow►mP� SGnWar�z / t %e&J,-'�q►'� v coy" n1C-f � E.5ERVATON1 -D,33 6yVc,4w-')y ~S�� a�o� FUND FTitle Title Company Information I / 'Q wd / ( �/ ame • fre o S bSO�C �0,'.5/a- S F 9 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached ,D `e -Q- made by: (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) t1 q 1004 Lro Q{'�I eS The premises herein is situated in 4(lM j�f q qh�rs�jy SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. TO In the Township of In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of t~ q S� m ('tf o r" DUXES 5 ITIRU 9 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. (OVER) - MAILING ADDRESS: ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS *QF SOP.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE SOV" Old Southold, NY 11971 bhair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON 'tel �a�� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND yIroUNT`I,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AGENDA October 16, 2006 6:00 p.m. SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING Board to set Monday, November 13, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:00 p.m. - Oregon LLC/Morrell LLC: This proposal is for a conservation subdivision of a 52.91-acre parcel, inclusive of SCTM#1000-83-2-12 and SCTM#1000-83-2-11.5, into eight (8) lots, where Lot 1 equals 80,143 s.f., Lot 2 equals 84,221 s.f., Lot 3 equals 80,195 s.f., Lot 4 equals 1,239,745 s.f. proposed for Development Rights Sale to Suffolk County, Lot 5 equals 80,103 s.f., Lot 6 equals 81,283 s.f., Lot 7 equals 508,119 s.f. proposed for Development Rights Sale to Suffolk County, and Lot 8 equals 40,020 s.f.. The property is located on the n/s/o Oregon Road, at the terminus of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#'s1000-83.-2-11.5 & 12 6:05 p.m. - Badenchini, Luigi: This proposed clustered conservation subdivision is to divide a 32.73-acre parcel into 5 lots where Lot 1 equals 2.07 acres, Lot 2 equals 4.37 acres inclusive of a 2.36 acre right-of-way, Lot 3 equals 1.18 acres, Lot 4 equals 1.24 acres, and Lot 5 equals 23.75 acres upon which the Development Rights are proposed to be sold to the Town of Southold. The property is located on the n/s/o Oregon Road, approximately 135' w/o Alvah's Lane, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-95-1-5 6:10 p.m. -Young, J. Myron et al.: This proposal is for a Conservation Subdivision of a 21.7837-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is 10.6837 acres and is proposed to be acquired by the Town of Southold for Open Space purposes, and Lot 2 is 11.1 acres upon which the Development Rights have been sold to the Town of Southold. The property is located on the n/s/o Main Road, approximately 1,422' e/o Aldrich Lane in Laurel. SCTM#'s1000-125.-1-6.3 & 6.4 Southold Town Planning Board Agenda Page Two October 16, 2006 6:15 p.m. - Shur, Randy: This proposal is for a Conservation Subdivision of a 16.7076-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is 3.4805 acres and is currently improved with a single-family residence and accessory structures, and Lot 2 equals 13.2271 acres upon which the development rights have been sold to the Town of Southold. The property is located at the terminus of Sound View Avenue, e/o Saltaire Way in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-94-3-1.6 Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Eastern Long Island Kampground: This amended site plan is for an 80-space overflow parking lot with a controlled access/egress and new landscaping on a 24-acre parcel in the RR Zone located on the s/s/o of County Road 48 at the s/w intersection of CR 48 and Queen Street/Lane in Greenport. SCTM# 1000-40.-3-5 Charnews, Daniel & Stephanie: This proposal is to subdivide a 23.4004 acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 3 acres and Lot 2 equals 20.4004 acres. The property is located on the w/s/o Youngs Avenue and the a/s/o Horton Lane, approximately 375' south of CR 48 in Southold. SCTM# 1000-63-1-25 CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS, STANDARD SUBDIVISIONS, RE- SUBDIVISIONS (Lot Line Changes) Final Determinations: D'Addario-Pope Lot Line Change: This proposal is to merge a vacant, 18,743 sq.ft. parcel (SCTM#1000-126-4-16.1) with the adjacent properties to the east and west, where, following the land transfer, SCTM#1000-126-4-14.1 will be 19,998 sq.ft. and SCTM#1000-126-4-17.1 will be 49,642 sq.ft. in the R-40 Zoning District. The property is located on the n/s/o Peconic Bay Boulevard, 200' e/o Masters Road in Laurel. Beach Plum Homes: This proposed Clustered Conservation Subdivision is for 5 lots on 27.15 acres where Lot 1 equals 23.96 acres, upon which the Development Rights on 22.2246 acres are proposed to be sold to the Town of Southold, Lot 2 equals 31,000 sq. ft., Lot 3 equals 32,800 sq. ft., Lot 4 equals 33,712 sq. ft. and Lot 5 equals 30,916 sq. ft. in the A-C/R-O Zoning Districts. The property is located on the n/s/o Ackerly Pond Road and the w/s/o NYS Route 25 in Southold. SCTM#1000-69-3-10.1 Southold Town Planning Board Agenda Page Three October 16, 2006 Boocock, Estate of Glenn Winnett: This proposal is for a lot line change that will transfer 68,244 square feet from Lot 1 (1000-4-7-1) to Lot 2 (1000-4-7-2) where, following the transfer, Lot 1 equals 82,729 square feet and Lot 2 equals 172,742 square feet, in the R-120 Zoning District. The property is located on the south side of East End Road at Block Island Sound, on Fishers Island. SCTM#'s 1000-4-7-1 & 2 Shur, Randy: SCTM# 1000-94-3-1.6 Oregon LLC/Morrell LLC: SCTM#'s 1000- 83.-2-11.5 & 12 Badenchini, Luigi: SCTM#1000-95.-1-5 Young, J. Myron et all.: SCTM#'s1000-125-1-6.3 & 6.4 Conditional Final Determinations: Baxter, Mark: This proposal is to subdivide a 6.7898-acre parcel into 2 lots where Lot 1 equals 4.4417 acres and Lot 2 equals 2.3841 acres. The property is located on the n/s/o Main Bayview Road, approximately 325' e/o Smith Drive South, in Southold. SCTM#'s 1000-78.-7-5.3 & 5.4 Setting of Final Hearings: Old Orchard at Cutchoque: Proposal is to subdivide a 4.619-acre parcel into four lots, where Lot 1 equals 75,675 s.f. s.f. Lot 2 equals 40,620 s.f., Lot 3 equals 40,082 s.f. and Lot 4 equals 44,830 s.f. The property is located on the northwest corner of New Suffolk Road and Cedars Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000- 109.-6-9.1 Setting of Preliminary Hearings: Brokaw, Bennett: This proposal is to subdivide a 4.997-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 80,000 square feet and is currently improved with a single-family residence and metal garage, and Lot 2 equals 137,665 square feet, inclusive of the 5,200 square foot flag strip. The property is located on the south side of Bergen Avenue, approximately 1299 feet west of Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-113-7-1.1 Southold Town Planning Board Agenda Page Four October 16, 2006 Conditional Sketch Determinations: Tall Pines at Paradise Point: This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision to subdivide a 19.825-acre parcel into five lots where Lot 1 equals 40,571 s.f., Lot 2 equals 40,436 s.f., Lot 3 equals 40,337 s.f., Lot 4 equals 40,000 s.f. and Lot 5 equals 40,000 s.f. in the A-C Zoning District. The property is located on the west side of Paradise Point Road, approximately 1,207' south of North Bayview Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-81-2-5 CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS, STANDARD SUBDIVISIONS, RE- SUBDIVISIONS (Lot Line Changes) - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Lead Agency Designation: Guadagno, Patrick: This proposal is for a standard subdivision of a 10-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 is 1.5 acres and Lot 2 is 8.5 acres, inclusive of a 1.5-acre building envelope and 6 acres of open space. The property is located on the n/s/o Orchard Street, approximately 1,008' w/o Platt Road in Orient. SCTM#1000-27-1-2 D'Addario-Pope: SCTM#'s 1000-126-4-15.1, 16.1 & 17.1 Uncoordinated Reviews: D'Addario-Pope: SCTM#'s 1000-126-4-15.1, 16.1 & 17.1 Determinations: D'Addario-Pope: SCTM#'s 1000-126-4-15.1, 16.1 & 17.1 Guadagno, Patrick: SCTM#1000-27-1-2 SITE PLANS Final Extensions: Cutchoque Business Center: This proposal is for an amended site plan for an alteration to an existing 12,000 sq. ft. building on a 6.1-acre parcel in the LI Zone located on the s/w/s/o the intersection of Oregon Road and Cox Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-83-3-4.6 Southold Town Planning Board Agenda Page Five October 16, 2006 Conditional Final Extensions: Cutchogue Harbor Marina: This proposed site plan is for an existing marina to include 18,029 sq. ft. of existing buildings, 120 existing boat slips, 92 existing parking spaces, 4 buildings including 1 apartment, 1 single family dwelling, office, bathroom and accessory building on a 3.9-acre parcel in the MI Zone located at the intersection of West Road and West Creek Avenue on the w/s/o West Creek Avenue in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-110-1-12 SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Type II Actions: Orlowski Hardware Company: This new site plan is for the proposed conversion of the 2nd floor of an existing building to 2,797 sq. ft. of office space where the existing basement is 2,797 sq. ft. of storage space, the existing first floor is 6,757 sq. ft. of retail space for a hardware store and 1,073 sq. ft. of retail for a clothing store where 70 parking spaces are required and no parking is provided onsite but use of nearby municipal parking is proposed, on a .27-acre parcel in the Hamlet Business zone on the southeast corner of Love Lane and Pike Street known as 320 Love Lane in Mattituck. SCTM #: 1000-140-3-3.4. Cutchoque/New Suffolk Free Library: This amended site plan is for the alteration of the existing structure increasing the space in the basement level by 1,788 sq. ft. and the mezzanine level by 2,352 sq. ft. on a 32,670 sq. ft. parcel on the s/e corner of NYS Route 25 and Case's Lane known as 27550 Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000- 109-6-2.2. Lead Agency Designation: Peconic Recycling & Transfer: This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on a 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on the n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-95-2-7. E Southold Town Planning Board Agenda Page Six October 16, 2006 Determinations: Peconic Recycling &Transfer: SCTM#1000-95-2-7. Matt-a-Mar By the Bay: This site plan proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the MII Zone located at a/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises: This site plan is for new construction of a 100' monopole cellular communication tower with Cingular locating antennas at 97'-0" and 87'-0" internally mounted in the tower, the site includes an existing boat marina and restaurant on 4.7 acres parcel in the Mll Zoning District located approximately 537' e/o Cedar Birch Lane on the s/s/o NYS Route 25 in Orient. SCTM# 1000-15-9-8 Scoping: Gala Holistic Circle: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on an 18.7-acre parcel in the Mll Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o NYS Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1 I Southold Town Planning Board Agenda 'Page Seven October 16, 2006 OTHER Reissue Final Approval: Doroski Family Limited Partnership: This proposed subdivision is for 4 lots on 40.56 acres where Lot 1 equals 99,316 sq. ft.; Lot 2 equals 103,823 sq. ft.; Lot 3 equals 80,000 sq. ft. and Lot 4 equals 34.06 acres upon which Development Rights have been sold. The property is located south of Sound View Avenue, 170' west of Hope Lane, in Southold. SCTM#'s 1000- 69.-1-9 & 59.-8-6 APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Board to approve the following Public Meeting Minutes: • November 7, 2005 • December 12, 2005 • January 9, 2006 • February 13, 2006 SCOTT A. RUSSELL JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEERTOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD , r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. 631 -765-9015 ° P s` 'o Tel 631 765-1560 JAMIE.RICHTER@TOWN.SOUTHOLD NY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER - - - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 2 6 2006 i Jerilyn B. Woodhouse l August 25;2006 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Oki-Do Ltd. Site Plan Shipyard lane, East Marion, NY SCTM#: 1000-39-07-7.1 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plans for the above referenced project. The Site Plan drawings have been prepared by the office of Young&Young, Land Surveyor;and the office of Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA. These drawings have been dated 3/17/04 & 12/28/05. Please consider the following: 1. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC)under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. 2. Drawing C-3: This existing condition drawing sheet shows the existing topography of the site and a flood Zone line of AE (EI 9). These two items need to be coordinated. While the flood zone line was interpolated from a large scale map it should also be modified to align with the nine (9')foot Contour that runs through the property. This item should be reviewed by the Building Department. 3. It is apparent that the main access to the site is proposed by the way of Shipyard Lane. I have reviewed this item with Mr. Harris and he has requested road improvement to Shipyard that would include resurfacing of the road and the installation of new drainage systems in the Town Right-of-Way. Additional drainage should be incorporated into the project design to recharge storm-water run-off before it reaches Peconic Bay. 4. The proposed access roadway to the Managers Residence may require Excavation, Fill and/or Grading to achieve a stable road design. The impact of this new road on adjacent property to the East should be dealt with. Landscape Buffers, the maintenance of storm-water run-off and the elimination of erosion problems should be addressed. 5. The Proposed Restaurant Building Setbacks from the High Water Mark should be reviewed with the Zoning board of Appeals and the Town Trustees. It is understood that there is an existing structure but to what extent will this building be reused? By the time the existing structure is made flood compliant it would be well over a 50% threshold for new work. In addition, the proposed design of the new facility does not appear to utilize any of the existing structure with the exception of its footprint. Therefore,itis recommended that the proposed new Restaurant facility be relocated to meet the minimum standards of Town Zoning and enhance the policies of the LWRP. This item should also be reviewed with Mark Terry for LWRP Consistency. Page 1 of 2 r Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson - Planning Board August 25, 2006 Re: Oki-Do Ltd. Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-39-07-7.1 Page 2 of 2 6. Cross section "A-A" on sheet A-4 and the Rock Revetment Detail on sheet A-5 indicate the toe of Revetment to be seaward of the High Water mark. It is recommended that this item be constructed landward and above the Mean High Waterline. In addition to preserving the marine community along the shoreline, this item would allow for the preservation of the foreshore that may be utilized by the General Public. This item should be reviewed by the Town Trustees and the LWRP Coordinator. 7. Storm Water Leaching Pools should be installed a minimum of two (2')feet above the Water Table. Some of the proposed leaching fields adjacent to Tidal Wetland areas may be set too deep.-Leaching Pool design depth and Test Hole information should be coordinated to maintain a minimum two foot separation. 8. The lighting plan on Sheet C-7 seems excessive when it appears that almost all of it will be located immediately adjacent to Town Right-of-Ways and the rear yards of the existing residential properties. It would appear that some of this site lighting and parking would be better suited if it were constructed within the interior of the site to reduce the impact on the adjacent property owners. 9. The current proposed location for the Southerly entrance to the site is too close to the road end. This Town road end is used for public access to the waterfront and should not be monopolized by the use of this new facility. It is recommended that this entrance be moved in a northerly direction to align with the entrance of the Condominium Complex located on the opposite side of the street. 10. Drainage calculations indicate that Tributary Area # 13 will have six (6) pools. The site plan only indicates five. This item should be modified accordingly. If you have any questions regarding this review, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Trustees Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator James F.King,President V�'�Of soyoTown Hall Jill M.Doherty,Vice-President ,`O 01 0 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A.Dickerson Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 �I�COUN,n' Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board FROM: James F. King, President Board of Trustees DATE: October 24, 2006 RE: Gaia Holistic Circle—Oki-Do. The Board of Trustees is familiar with and has conducted a site inspection of this property, which was formerly Long Island Oyster Farms. This company harvested and processed oysters. The property has also housed a boat building company and a marine supply and trap building company in more recent years. Because of the magnitude of this project, the Board of Trustees will conduct a joint review with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation. Environmental impacts of this proposal are our primary concern and consist of, but are not limited to the following: verification of wetland line; - any armoring of the shoreline; - restoration of the shoreline; - adequate buffers between human activities and the marine district; - dredging needs for access to the existing basin and proper disposal of dredging spoils; - lighting, particularly along the shoreline; - protection of wetland areas; - maintaining any and all stormwater run-off on site; - protection of wildlife habitat; - no parking seaward of the restaurant; - keep south parking lot entrance as far landward as possible. The Trustees look forward to working with other Southold Town agencies as this project proceeds through the appropriate permit processes. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS __````�QF S0!/�y P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ��V� Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS �e Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G ® 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON1� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L TOWNSEND c'oh11 1 e� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Jim King, President - Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator OCT 2 0 2006 Date: October 20, 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle at East Marion SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II In the process of reviewing the above proposed action to the policies of the LWRP and the notice of disapproval issued by the Building Department on February 26, 2006, it has become apparent that the wetland jurisdictional boundaries have not been determined by the Town of Southold Board of Trustees. I am requesting that the Town of Southold Board of Trustees determine the jurisdictional wetland boundaries for the south portion of the property including the wetlands within the marina so that the proposed setbacks to the proposed structures can be evaluated. Cc: Ruth Oliva, Chair, Zoning Board of Appeals Patricia Finnegan,Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran,Assistant Town Attorney Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer MAILING ADDRESS: ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS __w\\*OF SOtiP.O. Box 1179 JERILYN�B.WOODHOUSE �OVv Olt Southold, NY 11971 ! Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS N Town Hall Annex MARTIN,,H.SIDOR G • Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE 1J5 SOLOMON l (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L."7'OWNSEND y�'�UIVT`l,�c� Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLU October 17, 2006 OCT 2 0 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 - Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II ,District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and i WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two October 17, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping scheduled public participation on October 16, 2006 in a scoping meeting from 4:30p- 6:00pm and will allow for comments received at the Planning Department by October 26, 2006; be it further RESOLVED, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 Scoping will review all information and prepare a final scope for distribution as the Lead Agency. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File Town of Southold Notice of Public Scoping Meeting OCT 10 2006 GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. MEETING DATE: Monday, October 16, 2006 at 4:30 P.M. LOCATION: Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971 The Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency-pursuant to Part 617 of the State regulations for Article 8,the State Environmental Quality-Review(SEAR) Act of the Environmental Conservation Law, has scheduled a public meeting for the purpose of determining the scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to be prepared for the proposed action described in this notice. The Town of Southold Planning Board has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a SEAR Positive Declaration requiring the applicant to prepare a DEIS. APPLICANT: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SCTM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS/APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NYS DEC) 401 Water Quality Certification (NYS DEC) Excavation and Development Permit (Town of Southold) Building Permits (Town of Southold) Site Plan Approval(Town of Southold) Site Soil Monitoring and Management Plan (SCDHS &DEC) Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- Stony-Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of'I rustees v/ Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry,LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner,NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms &9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats,72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space,retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessoryuses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. Page Two October 10, 2006 guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck,pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitarywaste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft.for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M# 1000-38-7-7.1 PROJECT LOCATION: The subject property lies in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk,New York. The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane,immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane, 50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II (M-2) District. MEETING PURPOSE: The purpose of"scoping" is to focus the DEIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or non-significant. Some environmental impacts to be considered for evaluation in the DEIS are identified in the Department's Positive Declaration and in the project Sponsor's (Patricia Moore, Esq.) Draft Scoping Document. Scoping will help to ensure that this DEIS is a comprehensive,accurate and complete document, adequate for public review and which properly evaluates the environmental impacts that may occur if the proposed landfill expansion is approved. PUBLIC MEETING: The public scoping session will be held on Monday, October 16,2006 at 4:30 P.M.,at the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971. Statements from local government officials, legislators,interested and involved agencies, and the public will be heard after a Planning Board Chair Statement is read into the record and the applicant gives a brief presentation detailing the proposed project. A stenographic record of the meeting will be prepared.Written statements will also be accepted until October 26, 2006 at the Town of Southold Planning Board office address at the end of this notice. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION: The application file may be reviewed by appointment at the Town of Southold Planning Board Department. In addition,the applicant has provided a Draft Scoping Document containing a summary of the SEAR process, including scoping,the project proposal and some potential environmental impacts. The applicant's Draft Scoping Document has not been approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board. It is being presented at this time for public review and comment. Copies of this Draft Scoping Document have been mailed to involved and interested agencies. In addition,the document may be reviewed at the Town of Southold Planning Board, 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 and Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,NY 11971. Anyone who plans to participate in the scoping meeting by providing comment is urged to review a copy of this document prior to the meeting. The scoping meeting location is reasonably accessible to persons with a mobilityimpairment. Interpreter services will also be made available to deaf persons, at no charge,upon written request to the Contact Person named at the end of this notice,within one week prior to the meeting, GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. Page Three October 10, 2006 pursuant to Section 202(1) of the State Administrative Procedures Act. All persons having an interest in this project are urged to attend or be represented either individually or collectively. NOTICE DATE: October 10,2006 CONTACT PERSON: Bruno Semon,Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Telephone: 631-765-1938 i r DRAFT SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OCT 1 0 2006 n_ "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR TRANSIENT MOTEL.J— SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION, TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD —�— SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Overview This document is a Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") for a proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-room motel in 24 buildings, with a related restaurant, a pool,personal services facilities, a private marina with 16 boat slips, maintenance and utility building, and a manager's residence. The proposed motel property would be aesthetically improved with a man-made lake, Japanese gardens and native landscaping. To ensure that the DEIS will address all significant issues, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, as lead agency, has elected to conduct formal scoping pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8. As such, the applicant is required to prepare and submit this Draft Scope to the lead agency which provides a description of the proposed action and the applicants' proposed content for the DEIS. Thus, this Draft Scope has been prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.8 and sets forth the following: • Brief description of the proposed action; • Potentially significant adverse impacts; • Extent and quality of information needed to adequately address potentially significant adverse impacts; • Initial identification of mitigation measures; and • Reasonable alternatives to be considered. 1 Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,8341-square-foot restaurant, a 1,987±-square-foot manager's residence, and a 1,373±-square- foot pool house with a swimming pool. On-site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 27 landbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed. In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the private marina, will include replacement in-place of approximately 515 linear feet of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight(8) 4-foot by 30-foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Primary access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency,restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. The subject property is situated within a Marina II Zoning District and the use is permitted by special exception from the Town of Southold Board of Appeals. 2 The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: Agency Approval Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Road Work Permit Department Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Sewage Treatment Plant Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection New York State Department of 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Environmental Conservation Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit 3 r The section of the DEIS entitled Description of the Proposed Action will provide a thorough description of the existing site conditions and the proposed action (which has been briefly described above). The Description of the Proposed Action section of the DEIS will specifically include information relating to: • Site and project history(including prior public involvement and input) and objectives of the project sponsor; • Project purpose, need and benefits; • Physical characteristics of the site and existing site conditions; • Utilities; • A summary of subsurface features, suspected contamination on the area proposed for development and remediation initiatives; • Detailed information on the proposed development including zoning and build- out data(e.g., buildings, pavement, landscaping, buffers, etc.) and site operations; • Site access and circulation; • Infrastructure demands including water supply,wastewater treatment and storm water management; and • Required approvals. Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts The DEIS will be prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.9(b).The Environmental Assessment Form identified the following potential adverse environmental impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed action that, as such, must be evaluated in the DEIS: soils and topography; water resources; ecology; land use and zoning; transportation; community facilities and services; aesthetics and cultural resources; and Consistency Analysis with the New York State Coastal Zone Management Program. These potential adverse impacts will be fully addressed in various DEIS sections, as briefly outlined below. 4 Soils and Topo ig_-aphy The Soil Survey of Suffolk County will be reviewed to determine soil classifications on the site and in the project area. This section of the DEIS will assess the soil type(s) on the site and the associated engineering limitations using the Soil Survey of Suffolk County and available soil boring logs. Topographic information will be included as obtained through review of relevant USGS Maps and available site-specific topographic surveys. A thorough narrative description of potential adverse impacts to soils and topography and strategies to minimize impacts will be included in this analysis. Changes in topography that would occur, including a quantitative characterization of the cut and fill required, will also be provided. Water Resources To adequately assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed development, the recommendations of the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study) will be reviewed for applicability and consistency of the proposed action therewith. The DEIS will also discuss the relevancy of the Special Groundwater Protection Area(SGPA)Plan. Furthermore, the consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated. Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. Regional and local hydrogeology conditions and regional water quality will be discussed. Depth to groundwater and direction of flow will be determined. The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority,will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand. 5 The existing stormwater management system on the site will be described. This will include, but not be limited to: stormwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition,post-development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of stormwater to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for stormwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stonnwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the Phase 2 stormwater regulations. Means of sanitary disposal will also be discussed in this section of the DEIS. Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. The proposed project's impact on groundwater quality will be evaluated. As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included. Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("ACOE") and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC"). As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ACOE and the NYSDEC would be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. EcoloQy All natural resources existing on the site will be evaluated in the DEIS through an inspection of 6 the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. In addition,protected native plants,plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. As part of this assessment, the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program will be contacted to obtain available information on significant natural resources on the site or in the surrounding area. Once the existing conditions data are obtained, future changes expected to any natural resources on the site and/or in the surrounding area will be assessed. Specifically, this section of the DEIS will evaluate the impacts of the proposed plan on the terrestrial ecology of the area. Land Use and Zoning This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. A physical description of the property (size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; a land use study of surrounding areas; description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning. As part of this effort, relevant land use plans and policies, including the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, will be reviewed. Specifically, this effort will evaluate applicable comprehensive plans and master planning efforts. This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings,parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. 7 Transportation The DEIS will include a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The work performed will include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. Tasks to be performed as part of the traffic impact study will include collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: 1. Several personal, on-site field observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. 3. An analysis of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 4. Supplementary manual traffic counts and Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) counts to be collected as necessary to update the available volume counts. 5. An examination of the traffic flow on Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Shipyard Lane in the vicinity of the site. 6. An evaluation of the safety factors by reviewing recent accident records obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. 7. The availability of police and fire protection services to the site. 8. A trip generation analysis to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed Gaia Holistic Center development. 9. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. 8 10. A trip assigiunent analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 11. Capacity analyses at key signalized and unsignalized intersections in order to examine their ability to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed Gaia Holistic Center. 12. A review of the access arrangements. 13. An evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed parking to meet the demands of the proposed use. 14. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. Community Facilities and Services The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: • Police; • Fire and Ambulance Services; • Water supply; • Sanitary; and • Solid Waste. The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services. The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. 9 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources This section of the DEIS will discuss and depict (through representative photographs) the current aesthetic character of the site and surrounding area. Architectural renderings of the proposed development and/or line-of-sight drawings from Gardiners Bay will be prepared to determine the visual impact of the proposed project. With regard to cultural resources, consultations will be undertaken with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP"). If additional testing is requested by OPRHP, a qualified archaeologist will be retained to perform same. If any cultural such resources exist, the impacts of the proposed development on same will be assessed by a qualified archaeologist and the results of that study will be provided in the DEIS. Extent and Ouality of Information Needed to Adequately Address Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts In order to conduct the analyses of potential adverse impacts, available information will be collected and reviewed and empirical information will be developed. While it is not possible to determine all information sources to be used, the following represents sources/research that have been preliminarily identified as necessary to perform the required analyses in the DEIS. Soils, Subsurface Conditions and Topog_raphy • Soil Survey of Suffolk County • Available soil boring logs • Existing studies, analyses, reports, regulatory documentation regarding subsurface conditions USGS Maps and available site specific topographic surveys 10 Water Resources • United States Geological Survey. 2002. Water Table of the Upper Glacial Aquifer on Eastern Long Island. • Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan • Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan • Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) • Nonpoint Source Management Handbook • Flood Insurance Rate Maps • NYSDEC Freshwater and Tidal Wetland Maps • National Wetlands Inventory Map • Consultations with the Suffolk County Water Authority • Suffolk County Sanitary Code and other applicable regulations • Consultations with NYSDEC and ACOE Ecology • Site inspections by a qualified biologist/ecologist • Consultations with the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program Land Use and Zoning • Available and relevant comprehensive plans (zoning maps, codes, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, etc.) of the Town of Southold and Suffolk County • Site and area inspections Transportation • Traffic counts • Accident data review • Projections of site generated traffic using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation, Seventh Edition or any subsequent edition • Highway Capacity Manual 11 Community Facilities and Services • Consultations with community services providers (police, fire, ambulance, water purveyor, sanitary, solid waste) Aesthetics and Cultural Resources • Site and area inspections and photographs • Consultations with the OPRHP Initial Identification of Mitigation Measures As the DEIS analyses have not yet been conducted, no specific mitigation measures have yet been developed. Nonetheless, where the impact analyses conducted in the DEIS indicate the potential for significant adverse impacts, this section of the DEIS will set forth measures to mitigate those impacts. Actions required and parties responsible to implement the mitigation will be identified. Reasonable Alternatives to Be Considered Pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, the DEIS must contain a description and evaluation of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action. Thus, the DEIS will analyze the impacts of the following alternatives and quantitatively and qualitatively compare these impacts to those associated with implementation of the proposed action: • No-Action (i.e., site physically remains as it currently exists and is fully occupied); and • Development in accordance with prevailing zoning(i.e., Country-Residence 40). Organization of DEIS Although not required as part of a Draft Scope pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8, so that involved 12 agencies and interested parties can comment on the proposed sections of the DEIS, below is a proposed table of contents: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 3.0 Existing Environmental Conditions 3.1 Soils and Topography 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecology 3.4 Land Use and Zoning 3.5 Transportation 3.6 Community Facilities and Services 3.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 4.0 Probable Impacts of the Proposed Action 4.1 Soils and Topography 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecology 4.4 Land Use and Zoning 4.5 Transportation 4.6 Community Facilities and Services 4.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 5.0 Mitigation Measures 6.0 Alternatives and their Impacts 6.1 No-Action 6.2 Development in accordance with prevailing zoning 7.0 Unavoidable Adverse Effects 8.0 Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources 9.0 Growth Inducing Aspects 10.0 Use and Conservation of Energy 13 22 The Suffolk Times•October 19, 2006 Now a Hunterpouglas J .3k oar e ars - on Showcase Priority Dealer- RV _ g " - " _ Now with the new Line and • jections all o ther Hunterpouglas products. ala o_ _ - Hun rDou las ,,-. . yge ever Light can change thin _ :,;� r g g" By Rebecca Packard Condominiums have conducted an in- ' ' l t i`h ® dependent traffic study and also plan - Silhouette window shadings soften rz. Neighbors, representatives of town an independent environmental study. - ,,r ,'' _ . A light to serthe perfect mood. -- = - e agencies, legal representatives of After-the session, Danita Otruba- ': g Contact us today for special ' ' nearby residents and investors voiced O'Connor,one of the project's archi- ,'c .a limited-time savings! t environmental concerns about the tects,said her client is addressing not = proposed Gaia Holistic only the environmental Center at a sco in session concerns related to the Lo- i = PLANNING .:.1, , at- Monday nights Plan- cal Waterfront Revitaliza- ` g g g. BOARD tion Program(LWRP),but DECORATE FOR THE HOLIDAYS nin Board meetin f} kA also additional environ= SAVE 100 Some speakers said little NOTES Per unit/2 unit max on Luminette®Privacy Sheers more than they're-submit- mental issues in order to ting letters outlining their get Leadership in Energy ' SAVE $50 concerns. Others raised concerns and Environmental Design (LEED) Serving the East End for over 35 years! Per unit/3 unit max on Silhouette'Window Shadings that echoed the board's own,such as Green Building Rating System certifi- FREE SHOP AT HOME -SAVE $25 dredging, transportation and "visual cation.That certification is concerned Your source for upholstery and window treatments. - Per unit/3 unit max on _ noise." Several people also worried with sustainable site development, . 722-0722 ' custom shutter Collection about what environmental impact the water savings, energy efficiency, ma- Vignette®Modern Roman Shades site could have if the project failed terials selection and indoor environ- MainAlouettO LightLouvers and the center was converted to hous- mental ualit The 'Planning Board Road,Aquebogue � q Y• g ing.Representatives of-Cleaves Point will accept written comments regard- ing LWRP concerns for the property that are postmarked by Oct. 26. The planning department expects to com- plete an LWRP consistency review by the end of next week. _ The Gaia Holistic Center would con- sist of 114 motel rooms in 24 buildings, .• a restaurant,pool,private marina with 16boat slips,a maintenance and util- ity building,manager's residence,and 0 O personal services facilities. The prop- erty would also be-landscaped with " native landscaping and a Japanese garden, which Ms. Otruba-O'Connor- -- says will help with water issues. _-- GHOST ■ Cuddy makes the cut After about four-years before the Planning Board,Mark Baxter received conditional approval for a subdivision 1 of his property on Main B ayview Road in Southold. In a public hearing held_ earlier this year,neighbors expressed concern that the lot is on wetlands, and Charles_Cuddy,Mr.Baxter's-law- yer,responded by saying they had got= ten approval from the Suffolk County - Th u reday, Oct. 19 through Water Authority, the Department of Environmental Conservation and the 5atu rd ay, Oct. 2& 'Suffolk County Department of Health Services."We listened carefully to the Our jewelry doesn't Stand a hoot of chance of - �_ y _ g comments from the neighbors and -- going home with you at-regular rices! every one of-their concerns was ad- p dressed," said board chairwoman Jeri Woodhouse in a phone interview.She ` 10 % said that after consulting all the appro-priate local,county and state agencies, Un-t0 p f� there were no grounds for dismissing. r Excluding 5warovski Ind the proposal.- previously discounted items •• ■ More land preserved . Five proposed conservation subdivi- A L L 5 A L E 5 _ sions,two of them clustered,were ap- F I N A L' proved by the Planning_Board, mak- ing the development rights for about - - 110 acres available*for purchase by Southold Town,and Suffolk County. Four of them are proposed for pur- " Tuesday through Friday 9:30 a.m. — 5:30 p.m. chase by the town and one by the county. "I commend the landowners 5atu'rday 9:30 a.m. — 111. on working closely with the Planning Board and land preservation depart- = ment to, preserve these lands. It's a Ms.Woodhouse. Feat�ier Hill;- Main Rd., .Southold win-win situation.for Southold," said rE BE�RT S • "5- 1061 , THE SUFFOLK TimEs. VELERS - �� n� . We've got you covered �--L 0YSTERPONDS U.F.S.D. IN ORIENT 23405 MAINROAD _ ORIENT NY 11957 Telephone 631323-2410 Fax 631323-3713 Website:www.oysterponds.k12.ny.us 'Dr.Stuart Rachlin Superintendent i f +--• October 16,2006 ` I Ms.Jeri Woodhouse,Chairperson OCT 1 7 2006 Southold Town Planning Board P O Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 L _ Dear Ms.Woodhouse, I am writing to you today,on behalf of the Board of Education of the Oysterponds Union Free School District in Orient,regarding the application of the GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd.,for the construction of a holistic health center to be located at 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion. Of the utmost concern to the existence of this school district is the potential fiscal impact that such a project would have.It has been brought to our attention that the applicant has,in the past,been granted not-for-profit status;as such,the removal of this property from the tax rolls would engender a decrease in total assessments and revenue—the primary source of income required by a school district to operate.Under no circumstances can we maintain a school with increased costs and,at the same time,suffer an erosion of our revenue base.As has been done in the past with projects with the potential for being granted tax-exempt status,we would expect that PILOT payments would be paid to the district equal to the lost tax revenue,should that status be granted. Also of concern to us is the impact of a potentially increased student enrollment due to employee housing(on- site or off-site)and/or winter rentals of the rooms at the facility.As a district of approximately 100 students in grades K-6,space constraints are of great concern;in addition,should any of these students require special services,we could be forced to employ additional teachers or service providers which would greatly increase our budget—well after the beginning of the school year.This increase in student population would,of course, also impact upon our transportation. The Oki-Do project puts the future of the Oysterponds School District at a turning point;it is now up to your Board to determine in which direction we will proceed.Kindly inform me as to the progress and status of this project,and rest assured that I, in turn,will relate all information to my Board of Education. Sincerely, *7_ elhlin, Stuart Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Cc: Mr.B. Semon Ms.R.Oliva Mr.J:King v-' Supervisor S.Russell + ROBERT F_MUIR 2850 GELLETTE DRIVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 James F.Kin€r_President October, 14-2006 Town Trustees Southold,N.Y. 11971 President King: Re. Gaia Circle Old-Do proposal Nancy and I have been property owners on Gillette Drive since 1,961 and webuilt a summer home in 1971 and retired full time in 1989 Oki Do,will be our back fence neighbors and the emergency exit from the property at Cleaves Point Roads is our property line on the south. We have several serious concerns with the-project- We want the"Emergency Exir to be Gated and locked with access only ---— - for-emergency activities. We have 60 residences in Marion MManor,now .ready fully developed with many young families and more than 16 young l�ehildlren playing in,the streets,.waiting,for the school bus or o�theme way T 1 006' + ;I1®the beach. Additional tic from the Spa or during construction would create a very dangerous situation �We have had serious drainageproblems when there are heavy rains.or Northeaster storms_ Close attention to the control of the Bow of water at --the Spa is required in order that the flooding situation not be increased. The promoters claim that this entity will,be"Profit-Making" and.will be a taxpayer for all local services including Schools,Fire Departments,etc.- This must be guaranteed even if it later becomes a non-profit org. We have followed the progress;closely and,have written,several letters to the Planning Board and the Zoning.Board of Appeals,copies.are attached-. Also,them are 4 photos taken after the October 2005 rainstorm to show the extent of the flooding on the Oki Do property as well one showing the road end at Cleaves Point Road and the yards of the two adjacent houses_ We appreciate any input and oversight you may be able to furnish as this Project progresses. In addition to being an immediate bordering neighbor and taxpayer,I am also a Director of The Marion Manor Property Owners Association and the District Treasurer of the- Oysterponds School District. Respectfully submitted, March 2, 2006 (� it_ i I_ Ms. Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson 1 i Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall OCT 1 6 2006 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 - Dear Ms. Oliva Re: Gaia Circle aka Oki-Do Property in East Marion (Formerly Oyster Farm) As residents of over forty years combined, Robert F. Muir and Joseph Licciardi are writing this important letter to insure the Board has first-hand information from actual residents who border the property. Our combined properties, Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Marion Manor, total approximately 620 feet of exposure to the property. We have experienced flooding in this area numerous times from heavy rains. The water gathers along the eastern portion of the property and slowly seeps into the ground. This area is a natural low'-lying drainage area for the surroundings. The oyster shells in the area should be removed to increase the natural drainage the wetland provides. Also, not mentioned or noted anywhere, is the existing earthen berm protecting the homes on Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road from flooding. The original drawing submitted by Oki-Do, stamped"received 7/29/2003" had a drainage pond located in the southeast corner wetland area of the property. It has been removed in the new drawings. In its place the new drawings reflect 3 buildings in the general area. The drainage pond from the original plans should be restored and possibly enlarged and situated to run North-South as this is the primary wetland drainage area. Relocating the three buildings in the new drawings away from this wetland and Positioned more as the first drawings reflected would benefit'us all. Additionally, the original proposed road, which entered the property from Cleaves Point Road, only turned to the right(North) in the original drawings. The updated drawings now have the road running North and South from Cleaves Point Road. The southern part of the road is our primary concern, as it will pave over the lowest lying portion of the property, reducing the natural drainage, which is so critical to our properties and environment. The last storm, October 2005, caused the Oyster Farms lot to flood, the overflow then spilled out flooding homes and properties along Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road.We strongly believe that placing solid structures, foundations, paths and a roadway will cause major water problems for the neighbors as well as the owners of the Oyster Farms property. According to the ground elevation plan, the southeast corner and up along the eastern property line is at some places as low as two feet above sea level. We hope our comments to the Board will allow an opportunity to review the impact to the environment and assist in improving the situation for all involved. Sincerely, Robert F. Muir Joseph Licciardi 2850 Gillette Drive 50 Cleaves Point Road East Marion, NY 11939 East Marion, NY 11939 ROBERT F MOIR 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE Phone 631 477-0075 EAST MARION.NY]1939 Email muirbob@optonline.net Ruth D. Oliva-Chairperson July 05,2004 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 'Subject: GALA CIRCLE formerly OKI-DO Dear Ms. Oliva:, This is a follow-up to my letter of September 05,2003 now that a revised plan has been submitted under Of GAIA CIRCLE. In addition to my previously stated concerns I add the following: toe name 1. The plan calls for 107 living units in the Spa and the cottages plus 3 houses for managers. Allowing2people per unit this would allow for 220 residents in addition to the 200 seat restaurant. This would seem to be a higher density than our Community could support giving the potential additional demand on our police, emergency services. P e,and otr 2. The addition of a"Gas Dock" to the marina area would seem to be an unnecessary potential Pollution danger to a concentrated residential area. P and fire 3. The pools or ponds would be decorative but would there be enough water circulation to avoid os uito breeding areas. q 4. There must be a permanent commitment to keeping as "non-profit"health related facility as San Simeon did o avoid Propro ert a tax producer and not allow it to ever be a P P rty taxes. Your consideration of these concerns will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Robert F.Muir ( { FF l r1� -- - \ j r.!�� OCT 1 6 2006 ROBERT F. MUIR 215 E D ST= 0a ---------------------------------------- _77 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE Home Phone 631�477-2�225 --------------------- --------�_ �EA Email lnuirbob@optonlin�e net ...... 11939 'IF September 05,2003 Lynda A. TOrtora, Chairperson Zoning Board OfAppeals OCT 16 2006 Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Dear Ms TOrt0ra:, Reference is made to the OKI-DO application for the properby Wife'Nancy Muir and I are he owners of I located on Shipyard Lane,East Marion, the Tax Map backing up lots#6 and#7 on the Original Marion Man an ari NY. My to the OKI-DO Property in question. or subdivision or No.29.1 on We are concerned with the following: The Emergency Road with the Outlet on Cleaves Point Road and Gillette Drive Our.reservation is the nature of the Emergency Exit• our streets and narrow and would not be able to support. was allowed to become a families with small common and or exit, Our area is rapidly bec the additional traffic if this children- We would strenuously ing fully developed with many We understand the need Object if the streets became a Major exit or entrance. Manager's house Will be located v for an Emergency Exit Road Gillette and ery near the terminus but urge that it be a limited Or gated exit,since the if large constructionvehicles onto Cleaves Point Road expectin of the road. We have seen too many cars come down vehicles were allowed 9 it to be a connecting road. It would be doubly dangerous during the building Period. The object of becoming a Holistic Center with only Wa Provide a quiet, lkwaYs,not roads for access to the buildings is to distraction if there atmosphere for their guests. re was a regular exit and Continuous traffic around the Perimeter road would be a 2. entrance off Cleaves Point Road. Drainage is also a Potential problem. You Will note that there is a"berm" and the adjacent properties rty consisting mostly of oyster shells and dirt along the southeastern border Of the roe to keep water B7 - Also the Tower o M of DeP ent constructed a"drY well"at the end of the paved Portion of the road to help control the drain'A fl artin from draining onto Cleaves Point Road We Purchased Lot#6 on the"Map, age and the ow of water during heavy rainstorms. 13, 1963 and built our house in 1971. We enlarged the Original house in 1988 when it became Our full time residetnce. We have enjoyed the peaceful existence to this OfMar'011 Manor"Aug Point and would object to any widening of the streets to accommodate more traffic that would be caused by the connecting Cleaves Point Road with acceptable solution. OKI-DO as a regular entrance or exit. Generally we find the Proposal to be very well Planned.An emergency exit would be an Sincerely, MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pF S0 P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ��Vv Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDORG 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON r�p ^�� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND l4`'Or' ny'�`(,�` Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM - -_--_ - ------ Date: October 12, 2006 ' OCT 13 2006 To: Town Trustee & Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Gaia Holistic Circle OKI-DO SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Status: This site plan is scheduled for a Planning Board scoping public hearing on October 16, 2006. In reference to the above, attached you will find a copy of site pictures taken on October 10, 2006. This is for help in review of the site conditions. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc. Pictures Cusack, Heather From: Chic Voorhis [cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:37 AM To: Terry, Mark; Semon, Bruno; Finnegan, Patricia; Corcoran, Kieran; 'Edwards Ken (E-mail)', 'George Solomon (E-mail)'; 'Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Townsend (E-mail)'; 'Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail)' Cc: Ford, Amy; Kowalski, Linda, Standish, Lauren; Cusack, Heather; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie Subject: RE: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc I as well. Chic Voorhis ---,--Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark [mailto:mark.terry@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:52 AM To: Semon, Bruno; Finnegan, Patricia; Corcoran, Kieran; Chic Voorhis (E-mail) ; Edwards Ken (E-mail) ; George Solomon (E-mail) ; Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail) ; Joseph Townsend (E-mail) ; Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Cc: Ford, Amy; Kowalski, Linda; Standish, Lauren; Cusack, Heather; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie Subject: RE: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Bruno, I concur with this timeframe. -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:45 AM To: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Corcoran, Kieran; Chic Voorhis (E-mail) ; Edwards Ken (E-mail) ; George Solomon (E-mail) ; Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail) ; Joseph Townsend (E-mail) ; Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Cc: Ford, Amy; Kowalski, Linda; Standish, Lauren; Cusack, Heather; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie Subject: FW: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Hello, Attached is the reply. It appears that the best coarse of action is to get all comments from all involved agencies and issue a final scope prior to sixty days. To get us all on the same page and be clear on the deadline. Be advise that the planning office received the draft scope on 9/12/06 the day after the PB Public Meeting, which equates the sixty day due date is Friday 11/10/06. The date of this scoping session was confirmed on 10/5/06 by the Planning Board. All the paper work was mailed/sent on 10/10/06 because of the holiday. The deadline date requesting all comments to the Planning Department is Thursday 10/26/06. This requires that the draft final scope be prepared by Planning Staff/NPV for review at the PB work session on Monday 10/30/06. Comments/changes from the PB will be incorporated by PD staff and the final scope version will need to be adopted at the next PB work session on Monday 11/6/06. If I understand the SEQRA regulations the next scheduled PB Public Meeting scheduled on 11/13/06 will place the Planning Board in non compliance of the date and possibly force the DEIS to be accepted. Please advise me of any changes, concerns, corrections and or comments of how this scoping action will proceed. Thanks Bruno 1 ----'Original Message-----` From: Chic Voorhis [mailto:cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:45 AM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; 'Carrie O'Farrell' Subject: RE: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Bruno, Sounds like the same question and the same answer. If more than 60 days goes by, the applicant can submit the DEIS according to the Draft Scope. That would not be a good thing and I would not recommend it. SEQRA is funny with time frames and most are interpreted loosely since an applicant would have to file a lawsuit to compel a board to act. In this case, 617.8 is pretty clear that the applicant may proceed and file a DEIS according to the draft scope if, more than 60 days goes by. See what Pat Finnegan says, but I would be concerned about not adopting a final scope within 60 days. Chic Voorhis -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno.Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3 :29 PM To: Chic Voorhis Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Hi Chic, Is it possible that the agent give a time extension to the sixty days if requested by the lead agency? Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Chic Voorhis [mailto:cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:05 AM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Terry, Mark; 'Carrie O'Farrell' Subject: RE: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Bruno, It is not a question of legality. I would not recommend an extension. If more than 60 days passes from date of submission of draft scope, and a final scope is not adopted, the applicant may submit a DEIS based on the draft scope. We don't want that to happen. Please try and obtain final comments from the ZBA. Thanks, Chic Voorhis -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno.Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:15 AM 2 To: Chic Voorhis (E-mail) Cc: Terry, Mark Subject: FW: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Hi Chick, Is it legal for the PB to offer an extension time in the review for scoping? See the attached document request from the Town ZBA. Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Kowalski, Linda Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3 :20 PM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: Oki Do Ltd ZBA Request for LWRP etc Hi Bruno, Copy of the attached was delivered to Linda R. this afternoon at ZBA Chairwoman's request by telephone today, but thought you may be interested also because of time elements (and part of discussions by Ruth Oliva last Friday when you stopped in) . Thank you also from Ruth (in Seattle for this week) . <<Oki Do Ltd.doc>> 3 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBL!i6 __````��F so(��y P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �OVv O1 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G @ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D SOLOMON �Ol� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �''�U Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Architectural Review Committee Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Planning Commission Southold Town Board of Trustees/ Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Building Department New York State Department of Transportation Southold Town Engineer NYSDEC- Stony Brook Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Public_Works__—, - rhj From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner Lc' Date: October 10, 2006 OCT 11 2006 RE: Agency referral requests required as per Southold Town Code Article X&280-131 Review Procedure Part C,the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns,comments and jurisdiction requirements,if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. The following is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Orlowski Hardware Company 320 Love Lane,Mattituck SCIM#: 1000-140-3-3.4 This new site plan is for the proposed conversion of the 2nd floor of an existing building to 2,797 sq. ft. of office space where the existing basement is 2,797 sq. ft. of storage space,the existing first floor is 6,757 sq. ft. of retail space for a hardware store and 1,073 sq.ft. of retail for a clothing store where 70 parking spaces are required and no parking is provided onsite but use of nearby municipal parking is proposed on a .27 acre parcel in the Hamlet Business zone on the southeast corner of Love Lane and Pike Street known as 320 Love Lane in Mattituck. SCIM# : 1000-140-3-3.4. Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc.: Site plan application SOUTHOLD PLANNII:i� BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: 8 / 25 / 2006 Site Plan Name: Orlowski Hardware Company Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 140- 3 - 3 . 4 Other SCTM#s: eet A �"ae•�;,�,.1:4.awmin.r«,4 v,;i,,.�J,ter•,r;r-:»:�, W.:..xn •.�,�,,;: Str ddress: 320 L QvQ Lane Hamlets � ��c��,��. :. ,.:n:..,�.=,.zi�sk� �..,."', Distance to nearest �Taa t > > NY intersection: Corner of Pike St - - 74%,'� Type of Site Plan: x New Amended dential"» If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Anent Contact Information _ Please list name, mailing address, and phone number o' the peopl6'bolotiv.; Property Owner Love Lane Realtyv-„ ^ x a.•y .,;,��x^"F"s ry�.rom. ..».:--tom M;:;�.:� ':.':'fi.R�'" Street 320 Love Lane City Mattituek State NYZip 11952 Home Telephone Other 298-8420 ( store) Applicant Richard Orlowski (Owner ) Street 355 Leslie Rd. City Cutchogue State NY Zip 11935 Home Telephone 734-2230 Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)* Francis J. Yakaboski , Attorney Street 456 Griffing Ave . � � , � �g9 City Riverhead NY Zi 11901 State p Office Telephone 727-4100 Other Fax: 727-4130 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2 7� SECTION C: Site Data f Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use x Property total acreage or square footage: 11872 te/sq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 7929 a&./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No x If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): H. B. - Hamlet Business Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 4 / 26 / 06 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Retail and storage List all proposed property uses: Retail , storage & office Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 66 . 7 % Proposed lot coverage: 66 . 7 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): sq, ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): r Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 0 # of proposed spaces: 0 Loading B-ee the Yes x No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 0 % Proposed landscape coverage: 0 Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No_,__ If yes explain: I, the undersigned, cert' y ata iov formation is true. Signature of Preparer: Date: Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 At I I-ry 4, 1►_ 'fid a ,> 6/2006 10/06/20 f Ar , > : k.. " 'Jor ild V y . y _ e"' "V•iw" e w„y 10/06/2006 , ge Jt- 420 ot- 6/2006 00t- fi/2006 t 01 10/06/2006 �� • -� .sem w;l�yX„ �"'�'f �_��1.�. � INA Al r 3 0 , 06 ,% 2006 10/06/ 2006 34 1 i ��`: ��. � 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 I r Y ew- '•4'.FS�'til�_ fill. � 5 k 0/06/2006 10/06/20061 i --� - x► , , � �.,.. - �� . rye. �- ��• � w 0/06/20061 r. .4w • 10/06/2- AM M 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 tr I I J•' , f y. 1 Jtt loot* 10/06/2006 rte' + � e � � • f a , 1 s *a dw IMM 10/06/2006 — mob ow- RIM t . MO/2 10/06/2006, - 'S e wa /0642006 10/06,/ 24 • � 1 r _ , SM JA 1I I' .,+T�p � Ag SOL PEI 10/06/2006 '� j:`�`r R'iie r t 'S`r��y '�as •� i*,��7��f?' Pith .pis 3 +ate„ x''11 y. s r�tial x f Aw f • • t 10/06/ 2006 , r Y. - - ' s 6 oio6/2006 40 ti. 10/06/2006 4 y.� 4 i 44 10/06/2006 . ` 10/061200.6 .1 p o 10/06/2006 ^x, , � 1Ot'`06/2006 r 9 1• "l r Zf „"_"..'.'._---•-,.___-- fir- ' f+ ,� � � . - - IBMw 710 ;r r /r 'I 10/06/2006 ' • • �R 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 o s O 10 /06/2006 CD llot .. � ,per ••� - . . 10/ 06/2006 r 10/06/ 2006 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 p I II I s � 1 Y 111 OR t; . 10/06/ 2006 10/06/2006 'S CLI f: ". 10/06/2006y + • •r-. ;, 10/ 06/2006 _ �40 1 I Ill i 10/06/2006 10/06/20 Otto Ib r a' h. .._- 10/06/2006 10/06/ 2006 � 4 I r i C r Ogig � d` c r 10/06/2006 Y10/06/2006 t�. g. Ih 3 n M� r 0/06/ 2006 . : 54.K 5" 10/06/2006 i 8:. �:d �.9 k�' 1� —_ -si�.w-- ,i ��/�'i YAR ti ,�• ��u� � , "Is r t M .&:f' �a !+a �i+ ''•"` - �,�„ ,? ,lige_. .t - NA i t 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 '4cr-Fr " 0/06/200,6 10/06/2006 . ,�+ ,.=•iii• .• .. - 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 h 10/06/2006 = - - •10/06/2006 y _ Y �+ r Y fi PT Ae NEW- -- 1 10/06/2006 / / 0 + y. y - � A.�� \tel. � ., ` • 6/240`6 10/06/2006 10/0 ys A AK 19J06 2 00 6 10/06/2006 - 'N .i`•. , •jam r r. r, 10/06/ 2006 - 10/06 ' j r ; .A 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 fly-, t '' 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 jl �' �� t.:*k "r ,;,� f� �,�, •1 Vii. c Al Tv ' f p�. 10/06/2006 oil"Or 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 AL ft l Stu . 10/06/2006 rn — Y � r t r [, - �4.: 10% 06/2006 10/06/2006 .fie.. 'r t t i t i. .. (� 7-46 6 2 2006 PIE yk o.;r o 11 ^� 10/ / 06 k 06/2006 i _ � HL. 1 ter VsY"-~ -•` _ ZL fv 0/06/2006 0/06/,2006 10/06/2006 10/06/2006 • � -\ h. `,� r jam,' f`--'_ ..,. • of a :0 06, 20 -10/06 2006 w " _ .ter �^4 ..`i' J�' �}��,•\_ ° -� �'t i 10,/D6/2006 '� •QA6/2006 �T 4 � ra C S 1-0/"/2006 Field Inspection 8/12/03 ci( ' E II UMI k 4 a i s P, z J New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40- SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 1179-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 FAX: (631)444-0360 August 21, 2006 Denis- Involved Agencies Commissioner NYSDEC ` D LE CC� a�...nVC Town of Southold Suffolk County Department of Health CrJt ii+ n Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Lt; AUG 2 8 2006 1" Dear Sirs/Madams: J Sout1.1 - Tcivn Eoarc cf Trus es es The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Envirorlmeaftl Qualigy] 2vicw-A� SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 3. Issues of concern your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)to assist you in responding. Project Name: OKI-DO LTD. Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Hotel Project Location: 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion,NY SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 DEC Application#: 1-4738-00728/00008 Permit Type: Tidal Wetlands SEQRA Classification: [x ] Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status. [x] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action,but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days,we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at(631) 444-0365 for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Kendall Klett Environmental Analyst cc: (see distribution list above) htr r L.1%0P%f 1v I York State f j FOR PERMIT *,A 0 Utlaed States Army Corps of Engineers Applicable to agencies and permit categories fisted In Item 1. Please read all Instntctlons on back Attach additional Information as needed. Please print legibly or We. 1.Check Permits applied for: 2.Name of Applicant (U full na Telephone Number (daydme) NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation OKI-DO LTD. otzvC) WC(I 'f'(` 212 799-9711 ❑ Stream Disturbance(Bed and Banks) Mailing Address ` ❑ ONE LINCOLN PLAZA_AP.�. -- "Navigable (Excavation and Fill) ` ❑ Docks,Moorings or Platforms Post OfficeState Zip Code (Construct or Place) NEW YORK NY 10023 ❑ Dams and Impoundment Structures 3.Taxpayer ID (If applicant Is not Individuaq (Construct,Reconstruct or Repair) ❑ Freshwater Wetlands J � ❑✓ Tidal Wetlands 4.A�Applicant is elan: (check as as Apply) ❑ Coastal Erosion Control El Owner ❑ Operator Lessee ❑MuNcipallt /Govei�t envy ❑ Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 5.If applicant is not the owner,ktenti fidre-otherwise, you ma rovidigA enUContact Person Information. ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Owner or Agent/Contact Person -10aeF o Agent/Contact P Telephone Number (daytime) [] Potable water supply CRAMER CONSULTING GRQLJP 631 476-0984 ❑ Long Island Wells Mailing Address ❑ Aquatic Vegetation Control PO BOX 5535 ❑ Aquatic Insect Control Post Office fivuMILLER PLACE 1 N 10 code ❑ Fish Control 64 6.Project/Facility Location (mark IoCat10 reap; seeY;in�tr�tij NYS Office of General Services County. Terre ,.., p,.„_..- -� Mao Section/Block /Lot Number: (State Owned Lands Under Water) SUFFOLK EAST MARION 1000-38-7-7.1 ❑ Lease,License,Easement or Location (including Street or Road) - Telephone Number (devfime) other Real Property Interest Utility Easement(pipelines,conduits, E/S SHIPYARD LANE cables, etc.) Post Office State Zfp Code 7.Name of Stream or Wat�erbody (on or near project site) Eloccs,Moorings orPlatibmas DEAST MARION NY 111939 GARDINERS BAY (Construct or Place) Adirondack Park Agency 8.Name of USGS Quad Map: Location Coordinates: ❑ Freshwater Wetlands Permit GREENPORT QUAD NYTM-E NYM&N 4 ❑ Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 8.Project Description and Purpose:(Category of Activity a.g•new consbuctionfinstallatfon,maintenance or replacement; Type of Structure or Activity e.g.bulkhead,dredging,filling,dam,dq*taking of water, Type of Materials and Quantities; Structure and Work Area Dimensions;Need or Purpose Served) Lake George Park commission PROPOSED REMOVAL OF ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL BLDGS.; ❑ Docks(construct or place) CONSTRUCTION OF HOTEL FOR 114 GUESTS, RESTAURANT,VARIOUS ❑ Moorings(Establish) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; REFURBISH BOAT BASIN/SLIPS;CREATION OF LAKE; LANDSCAPING; RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BULKHEADING;DREDGING; US Army Corps of Engineers REMOVAL OF DETERIORATED SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES; ❑ section 404(waters of the United states) CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES, ❑✓ Section 10(Rivers and Harbors Aa) CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY ❑ Nationwide Permit(s) identify Number(s) For Agency Use only: DEC APPLICATION NUMBER US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 11.Will Project Occupy 112.Proposed Start 13. Estimated Completion CI Q ❑ state Lana?❑ 0 UNKNOWN Private Public Commercial Yes No 14.Has Work Begun on Project? (If yes, attach ❑ a 15.List Previous Permit/Application Numbers and Dates: (if Any) explanation of why work was started without permit) Yea No 16. Will this Project Require Addfflonal Federal, State,or Local Permits? Ye No PIeasse List: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,SCDHS 17. if applicant Is not the owner,both must alp the application 1 hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further,the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage,direct or indirect, of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to Indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting 1Pom said project In addition,Federal Law,18 U.S.C.,Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more then 5 years,or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up a material fact;or knowingly makes or uses a false,ficticlous or fraudulent statement Date Signature of Applicant Title Date Signature of Owner Tap C( 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer, Frequently, there are as whether a project or action may pects a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formof knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowed e in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. al The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination ocess has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. P Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether-an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD A ,Fntr-Y USE ONLY now :* DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: �✓ Part 1 Y Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and 7anPart 2 y other supporting inf❑Part 3 considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agenc that: PP g ormation,and A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared, not have a B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and Will impacts that may have a significant i environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. g mpact on the 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban �✓ Industrial 11 Commercial Residential (suburban) ©Rural (non-farm) ©Forest Agriculture OOther Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. ' APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland(Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated(Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres I Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑✓ Well drained 100%of site Moderately well drained %of site. ❑Poorly drained %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E] Yes 0 No a. What is depth to bedrock_ SIA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: MO-10% 100% M10- 15% % 17 15%or greater_% 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ri No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes allo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-18(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [H]Yes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes a No Page 3 of 21 1 Z 11, Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? EYes []No Accordin to: Cramer Consulting Group Identify each species: Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ©Yes No , Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species" in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural". 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes a No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes 1i No The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? T Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes no 18. Is the site located inEYes gricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 a No 19. Is the site located in or substantiall contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? [:]Yes Yes ho No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ❑r No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: '17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately I 1 l4rooms 0 i. Dimensions(in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 190' width; 200' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock,earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed R Yes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ElYes ❑ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? a Yes ❑ No 4. How many acres of vegetation(trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from,site? 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 , w 5, Will any mature forest(over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes ❑. No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' monthl:_AO►year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes a No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 200'; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes a No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes a No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? a Yes ❑No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?17 Yes ME No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx.0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? IE Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? El Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? El Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchogue,Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑� Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect.)during demolition. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? 17 Yes allo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes,what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes a No 19. Will project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day)? 17 Yes no No 20.- Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? M Yes a No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? a Yes 17 No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity_ NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated'water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 11 Yes a No If yes,explain: Page 7 of 21 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 FAX: (631)444-0360 table August 21, 2006 Denis- Involved Agencies _ Commissioner NYSDEC Town of Southold Suffolk County Department of Health AUG 25 2006 ,. Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST I f �_ TRYM1 Dear Sirs/Madams: The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 3. Issues of concern your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding. Project Name: OKI-DO LTD. Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Hotel Project Location: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion,NY SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 DEC Application#: 1-4738-00728/00008 Permit Tyne: Tidal Wetlands SEQRA Classification: [x ] Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status. [x] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action,but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days,we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at(631)444-0365 for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Kendall Klett Environmental Analyst cc: (see distribution list above) JOINT APPLICATIOu, Vo-°-a York State ,FOR, PERMIT _ " ___.jed States Army Corps of Engineers „ Applicable t0 agencies and permit categories listed In Item 1 Please read aN instruetons on back Attach additional Information as needed Please pnnt legibly or type. 1.Check permits applied for: 2.Name of Applicant (U full na Telephone Number (daytime) NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation OKI-DO LTD. RZ(A–o L f, 212 799-9711 ❑ Stream Disturbance(Bed and Banks) Mailing Address ❑ Navigable Waters(Excavation ONE LINCOLN PLAZA- on and Fill) AP-124& ` ❑ Docks,Moorings or Platforms Post Once State Zlp Code (Construct or Place) NEW YORK t i NY 10023 ❑ Dams and Impoundment Structures 3.Taxpayer ID (If applicant is not individual) 9 (Construct,Reconstruct or Repair) ❑ Freshwater Watiands ❑✓ Tidal Wetlands 4.Applicant Is alan: (check asny as 4ply) ❑ Coastal Erosion Control ❑ Owner ❑ Operator 6 Lessee ❑Municipality/Grnie1 rngjl gency ❑ ,Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 5.If applicant is not the owner,kfenti Y Here- otherwise, you may roved A ent/Contact Person information. ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification Owner'or Agent/Contact Person Owner❑y Agent/Contact Perso Telephone Number (daytime) ❑ Potable Water Supply CRAMER CONSULTING GROV 1631476-0984 ❑ Long Island Wells Mailing Address ❑ Aquatic Vegetation Control PO BOX 5535 ❑ Aquatic Insect Post Office Control MILLER PLACE i g L�%Dvw Me+Wli C4 ❑ Fish Control 176 6.Project/Facifity Location (mark kx aUort reap NYS Office of General Servicesn� T Cfir�l�ce Section/Block/Lot Number. (state owned Lands Underwater) SUFFOLK EAST MAF116N ..,_.—_— 1000-38-7-7.1 ❑ Lease,License,Easement or Location (including Street or Road) Telephone Number (devtimei other Real Property Interest EIS SHIPYARD LANE Utility Easement(pipelines,conduits, cables, etc.) Post Office State Zip Cod ❑ Docks,Moorings or Platforms e 7.Name of Stream or Waterbody (on or near Project site) EAST MARION NY 11939 GARDINERS BAY (Constructor Place) . Adirondack Park Agency s: e.Name of USGS Quad Map: Location Coordinate ❑ Freshwater wetlands Permit GREENPORT QUAD NY7M-E NYTM-N 4 ❑ wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers 8.Project Description and Purpose:(Category of Activity e.g.new constructionrnstallaWn,maintenance or replacement Type of Structure or Activity e.g.bulkhead,dredging,filling,dam,dock,taking of water, Type of Materials and Quantities; Structure and Work Area Dimensions;Need or Purpose Served) Lake George Park commission PROPOSED REMOVAL OF ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL BLDGS.; ❑ Docks(Construct or Place) CONSTRUCTION OF HOTEL FOR 114 GUESTS, RESTAURANT,VARIOUS ❑ Moorings(Establish) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; REFURBISH BOAT BASIN/SLIPS; CREATION OF LAKE; LANDSCAPING; RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BULKHEADING; DREDGING; US Army Corps of Engineers REMOVAL OF DETERIORATED SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES; ❑ Section 404(waters of the United States) CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES, ❑✓ Section 10(Rivers and Harbors Act) CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY ❑ Nationwide Permit(s) Identify Number(s) For Agency Use Only: DEC APPLICATION NUMBER US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1u.Proposed use: 11.Will Project Occupy 12.Proposed Start 13. Estimated Completion F12 ❑ state Land?[] 0 Date: UNKNOWN 0 Private Public Commercial Yes No 14,Has Work Begun on Project? (If yes, attach ❑ 0 15.List Previous Permit!Application Numbers and Dates: (If Any) explanation of why work was started without permit) Yea No 16. Will this Project Require Additional Federal, State,or Local Permits? Ye No Please List TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,SCDHS 17. If applicant is not the owner,both must sign the application I hereby affirm that infornation provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further,the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage,direct or indirect, of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harniess the State from suits,actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project In addition,Federal L.aw,18 U.S.C.,Section 1001 provides for a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years,or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up a material fact;or knowingly makes or uses a false,ficticious or fraudulent statement. Date Signature of Applicant Title Date Signature of Owner TiU2 C( � l 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner,whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby-applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and j. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large,then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ©✓ Part 1 M Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: EIA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B.- Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive-declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions -Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency .Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 J PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Gaia Holistic Circle Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) ° e/s Shipyard Lane,East Marion,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd.c/o Patricia Moore,Esq. Address 51020 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone 1-631-765-4330 Name of Owner(if different) Oki-Do Ltd. Address One Lincoln Plaza,Apt 24E City/PO New York State NY Zip Code 10023 Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 Description of Action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant,manager's residence,various,accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance building,etc.), refurbished boat basin/slips,creation of lake/water feature,landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading,dredging,removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures,construction of new shoreline protection structures,construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. Page 2 of 21 t ` Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE,DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ID Industrial ElCommercial Residential (suburban) E]Rural (non-farm) Forest ElAgriculture D Other Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. ' APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres I Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? a. Soil drainage: 0 Well drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained %of site. ❑Poorly drained %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ID Yes107 No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: a0-10% 100% 1710- 15% % 15%or greater 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ri Yes rE7 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes EINo 8.• What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑� Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ❑■ No Page 3 of 21 1 11, Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? 1EYes ❑No Accordin to: Cramer Consulting Group Identify each species: Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? []Yes No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species"in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural'. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes a No If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ❑■ No The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size(in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBErc6 P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �O-w`�zF S�UryOl Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR N 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L TOWNSEND � l�UNTY,ySouthold NY�� ' Telephone: 631 765-19 38 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - • Y August 15, 2006 7 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. I _21 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 -- Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq., ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED that, on July 10, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency and will continue the review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Page Two August 15, 2006 Very truly yours, ?edlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Robert Kassner Legal Assistant Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary August 16, 2006 I p Southold Town Trustees•, AUG 1 7 2006 P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall a Main Road, -- Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle/OKI-do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President King and Board: Thank you for meeting with the architect and me. In accordance with our discussion the following suggestions and comments were made at the June 21,2006 work session : 1. Shipyard Lane could be terminated at the southerly terminus of the proposed south entrance of the property. The Town presently has a guard rail at the end of Ship Yard Lane. This would enable drainage structures to be installed within the town road, landward of the current road end, in order to address road runoff which is presently entering the Bay. Due to the extensive drainage that is being undertaken on site, additional drains for the benefit of the Town capturing some road runoff presently entering the Bay could be undertaken by the applicant. This proposal is subject to the review and recommendation of the Town Engineer and Highway Superintendent. 2. Due to the historic use of the property and the existing conditions of the property and structures, at this point the Board had no objection to the location of the buildings, as proposed on the site plan. 3. At this point the Board had no objection to replacement of the dilapidated bulkhead along the Bay and the proposed construction of Rip Rap to match the rip rap on the adjacent property, subject to a permit. 4. We discussed the need of a retaining wall, landward of the rip rap, in order to match the r ' N existing elevation of the existing grade of the property. Due to the replacement of the bulkhead with Rip Rap, at this point the Trustees had no objection to the retaining wall landward of the rip rap. 5. The condition of the existing bulkhead within the Private Boat Basin appears to be adequate and may not need replacement. Also the existing foundations are being reviewed for reuse. The existing foundations will require extensive engineering because the first floor of any habitable structure will require compliance with FEMA. 6. We confirmed to the Trustees that a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment has been completed at the property and no hazardous substances were noted. Very t ours, atricia C. Moore cc: Denita O'Connor Cramer Consulting Group tt r , t k ? x } t yr'V�' � r' ^+ ie ,+Ma! ffv NN d ! r t - • •a - ri t� 0l �eF4Y �Y u « r �� s�. ty4P map, .� �.,. t', Frs ... � .�,,.,��»✓„�v.k�,"�" � �� f 4fJ"i" �+�lln7•.,v"�A e `°W: 7 ', it i`'�C. ;h"f�v P �!r i.,�'T-G�'"F" ea�a� �i��ldQ ��`,�tl �*'�71I a •� y1 .ivr L" t ni*.«"�:rr'. .,.y �fi. .yu, "*• �� Sat�� l �' �, ►��ld F' .,yy 4; �, �• ts� ,e'r. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �O_,`��F SO P.O. Southold, NY 11971 Chair V`' 1 OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR cn Alv 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �pQ (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �� Southold'NY y�UUNT`1,�� Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD [Iffr1i'51E�.�� fl July 11, 2006 1 U,' JUL 2 7 2006 i / 1 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. r(pp r f 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 soui!0'd- EoaFj u7 - rU�'3 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 10, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i). If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers i _ . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBL+nt P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE *0f SOUTyOI Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR cn Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L TOWNSENDO��,COUNTI'�,��\ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 24,2006 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer. The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act- SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency, and 3. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form(EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SCIM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Requested Action: This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building,totaling 80,000 sq. ft.,including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats,72 public seats and 10 bar seats),plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Lead Agency Coordination Request Page Two July 24, 2006 SE QRA Classification: (X) Type I ( ) Type II ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Amy Ford, Senior Planner/Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty(30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. () This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. () Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC- Stony Brook Southold Town Building Department U.S.Army Corp of Engineers Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services 6 9 7..20 � �lt[k.]i�S�- ;211: 11 Appendix A 7 ies.tk ,:.f'•^ Y W+Mat.T. State Environmental Qualit `:;' FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiVt n� Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, m an e 17. be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not alwa's a project that are subjective or unmeasurable It is also understood that those whb d terms significance mar a ro ect o i n may knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expertin environment y y an Fr4g6en�p�ere ar," ects of in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the dust n of si nifica Y have little or n formal ala clysis In addition man The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and a ,e a has been orderly, comprehensive m nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduc=, g ®athold Town e kn ledge 9 R can be assur@Idrtl- lir tion information to fit a project or`action rocess Full EAF Components. The full EAF is comprised of three parts Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basicroject data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 p Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whetheritsa potentially-large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced project on !t Provides guidance Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is actually important used to evaluate whether or not the impact is MSAREA FOR LEAD AGENCYUSE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ED Part 1 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1M and 2 and 3 if appropriate), andPP other su ortin g information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined b Part 3 EIA The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, s on agency that significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be preparedwhich will not have a OB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there w for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* will not be a significant effect C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 v PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. li is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance Name of Action Holistic ur�%xry� 9 Gaia Cucle Location of Action(include Street Address, Municipality and County) �__ —�-- + ' r t els Shipyard Lane East M anon,Town of Southold,Suffolk County New York SCTM#1000-38-7-7 I i MAR 1 5 2006 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd. c/o Patricia Moore,Esq �;�n� IC•"dn Address 51020 Main Road ?' �...rd mum, City/PO Southold State N �., �x:_ ,� ..,,r •,ao ,.k,..�n��•��.,__;r•4,� y Business Telephone I-631-765-4330 ip Code`"t71*97I Name of Owner(if different) Oki-Do Ltd. Address One Lincoln Plaza,A t 24E City/PO New York State NY Zip Code 10023 Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 Description of Action. Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant,manager's residence,various accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance building,etc), refurbished boat basin/slips,creation of lake/water feature, landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading,dredging,removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures,construction of new shoreline protection structures,construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. I Page 2 of 21 t Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas 1 Present Land Use Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Other Abandoned Industnal buildings 2 Total acreage of project area 18.7 1 15 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agncultural) 14 4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0 1 acres Water Surface Area 14 acres 2 1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1 5 acres 1 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6 3 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Sod drainage. Well drained 100% of site Moderately well drained %of site Poorly drained %of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Yes - No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes "10- 15% % 15%Or greater 6 Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? M Yes m No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes ❑No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E]Yes 5D No Page 3 of 21 V 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ElYes 0 N Accordino to Cramer Consulting Group Identify each species, Ospiey nest in southeast corner of site Area will remain natural any constriction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on thero ect site? p � (i e , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑Yes n No Describe The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species"in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past However,thus SE portion of the site will i emain"natural". 13 Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 11 Yes No If yes, explain. 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes Fm]No The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality 15 Streams within or contiguous to project area a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary A 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area Site is ad)flrent to GardinPrg Ray. ThP sites ound ar,u;;,,dn;ed drCdged bash-,unsed ui wnjucnon wird the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands An inlet connects the basin to Gardeners Bay b Size (in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size Page 4 of 21 v 17 Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes No a If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes No b If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection Yes �No 18 Is the site located m an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? []Yes 0 No 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes No 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes �No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor. 18 7115 acres b Project acreage to be developed 17 2 acres initially, 17 2 acres ultimately c Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres d Length of project, in miles' NA (if appropriate) e If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % f Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. , proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour- _ 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h If residential. Number and type of housing units One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately I 114rooms 0 i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure. 35' height; 190' width; 200' length j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy iso —928 ft 2 How much natural material (i e rock, earth, etc) will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards 3 Will disturbed areas be reclaimed RYes ONo N/A a If yes, i or what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? n Yes No c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes F1 No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 16 1 acres Page 5 of 21 Q 5 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes H1 No 6 If single phase project Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition) 7 If multi-phased. a Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c Approximate completion date of final phase 35' month 2005 year d Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? E Yes ❑ No 8 Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes 5�No 9 Number of jobs generated. during construction 200', after project is complete -10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes M No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes EFINo a If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E Yes ❑No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14 Will surface area of an existing wafer body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes[H]No If yes, explain Project includes the creation of approx 0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15 Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F]Yes ❑No 16, Will the project generate solid waste? r - i Yes H No a If yes, what is the amount per month? 0 7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? °❑Yes ❑No c If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta location Cutchogue,Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 iY e If yes, explain, It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect)during demolition 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes HNo a If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month b If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? E]Yes Fw�No 19 Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes ENo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes 1 No 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F]Yes R No If yes, explain- Page 7 of 21 e 25. Approvals Required- Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board F-EgD Yes No City, Town, Village Planning Board M Yes E] No Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board Yes El No Special PernntS for Trans Motel &Restaurant City, County Health Department �Yes ElNo SCDHS Site Plan Other Local Agencies M Yes [H] No Trustee's Wetlands Other Regional Agencies E]Yes M No State Agencies Yes No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Federal Agencies Yes F1 No US Anny Corp C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes 1:1 No If Yes, indicate decision required. ElZoning amendment 1:1 Zoning variance New/revision of master plan _ p � Subdivision Site plan EE Special use permit EI Resource management plan Other Page 8 of 21 2 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 'Marine II(MII)District 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 18 7115 acre boatyard/marina foi building,storing, iepainng,renting,selling or servicing boats,which may include the following as an accessory use office for the sale of marine equipment or products,dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel,and similar uses E I 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ,NA 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 0 Yes 0 No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? ;Multi-family and single-family residential,agricultural,abandoned industrial land uses Zoning is R-40(I-acre single-family), RR(Resort Residential-Multi-family),MII(Marine District-site) t i c 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 1/o mile? M Yes F No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a What is the minimum lot size proposed? NA Page 9 of 21 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 1:1 Yes E No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? lul Yes E] No a If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Eyes EJNo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E Yes I.—H]No a If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic Yes L_J No Slight increase in local traffic as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Name Patrica Moore,Esq.for Oki-Do Date /Z Signature Title Attorney for Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 MAILING ADDRESS: P PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ``��F SDUTyOI Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR cA ,c 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �p� (cor Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L TOWNSEND �DUSouthold, NY NTY,� Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 27,2006 Re: Lead�enc Coordination Request Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion I JUL SCI'M#: 1000-38-7-7.1 3 2006 } , Zoning District: MII District Dear Coordinating Agency Reviewer: Please add the attached Project Description, dated received July 27, 2006,to the resolution beginning the SEQRA review dated July 11, 2006. The clarification includes a revised project description about the proposal that will provide a better understanding of the project scope,including all upland and shoreline activities. The Planning Board tentatively plans on making an environmental determination at its August 14,2006 meeting. Accordingly,we would appreciate receiving your responses by August 11,2006 in order to give ourselves adequate time to review them. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, ---7Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NYSDEC- Stony Brook Southold Town Building Department U.S.Army Corp of Engineers Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Solid Waste District Nelson,Pope &Voorhis,LLC Suffolk County Department of Health Services File ' I GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE @ EAST MARION J U L 2 7 2006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREMISES: 2835 SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION NY 1 SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,834±-square-foot restaurant, a 1,987±-square-foot manager's residence, and a 1,373±-square-foot pool house with a swimming pool. On- site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 271andbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed. In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the _private marina will include replacement in-place of approximateLy_515.1inear-feet_of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight(8) 4-foot by 30-foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The i $ project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency, restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. J U L 2 7 2006 '; _ Pk oil law mill 'Ogg -3 )Pl-7 cqls? lick Awyno its 14 P, e?5—7-o j a)q -0 q 5p- Saab id 0 05fI rn ►c�ts50 j p Lg T Ads C 'L(7� tA /Lu - T P LL 9002 qq FJ Vfl I10 w lam/ ct I it -OJ Oj- . . .......... J'i I- 14 06 11 : 42a r -e Law Office 63 35 4643 p. 2 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020)Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel:(631)765-4330 Fwx: (631)765-464') Robert Kassner Legal Assistant - , Margaret Rutkowski --T arg Betsey Perkins r Secretary July 10,2006 Southold Town Trustee,-, JUL 1 4 2006 P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Main,Road, Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle OKI-do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President King and Board: Thank you for meeting with the architect and me. In accordance with our discussion the following suggestions and comments were made at the June 21,2006 work session : I. Shipyard Lane could be terminated at the southerly terminus of the proposed south entrance of the property. The Town presently has a guard rail at the end of Ship Yard Lane. This would enable drainage structures to be installed within the town road, landward of the current road end, in order to address road runoff which is presently entering the Bay. Due to the extensive drainage that is being undertaken on site,additional drains for the benefit of the Town capturing sonic road runoff presently entering the Bay could be undertaken by the applicant. This proposal is subject to the review and reconimendation of the Town Engineer and Highway Superintendent. 2. Due to the historic use of the property and the existing conditions of the property and structures, the Board had no objection to the location of the buildings,as proposed on the site plan. 3. The Board had no objection to replacement of the dilapidated bulkhead along the Bay and the proposed construction of Rip Rap to match the rip rap on the adjacent property,subject to a permit. 4. We discussed the need of a retaining wall, landward of the rip rap, in order to match the existing elevation of the existing grade of the property. Due to the replacement of the JL41 14 06 11 : 42a re Law Office 63 65 4643 p. 3 bulkhead with Rip Rap,the Trustees had no objection to the retaining wall landward of the rip rap. 5. The condition of the existing bulkhead within the Private Boat Basin appears to be adequate and will not need replacement. Also the existing foundations are being reviewed for reuse. The existing foundations will require extensive engineering because the first Boor of any habitable structure will require compliance with FEMA. 6. We confirmed that a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment has been completed at the property and no hazardous substances wcre noted. Very truly yours, Patricia C.Moore cc: Denita O'Connor Cramer Consulting Group i - J U L 1 4 2006 JV 14 06 11 : 42a I,'- ',-e Law Office 63 GS 4643 P. 1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road U .i 11 Southold, New York 11971 FE Tel. (631)765-4330 Fax:(631)765-4643 JUL 1 4 2006 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C.Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient. be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited, ff you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. TO: LAUREN & SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES FAX NO: RE: OKI - DO; GAZA HOLISTIC CIRCLE (HILLYERI- DATE: Friday, July 14, 2006 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME: OPERATOR: comments: As requested by your attorney, Brownell Johnston and Mr. King, enclosed is a draft letter for your,review of the discussions made at the work session. Thapkyou. Patricia C. oore r 1 L� APR - 6 2006 Marion Manor Property Owners Association 2530 Gillette Drive East Marion,New York 11939 Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Hall Southold,New York 11971 Re: Oki-Do Gaia Holistic Circle April 5th,2006 Dear Mr. King, The Marion Manor Association represents sixty-five homes in Gillette/East Gillette Drive area of East Marion. We have concerns regarding the Gaia project, which we would like the town boards to consider. While we are pleased with the removal of the marina gas pump,the following lists are concerns that have not been addressed regarding the proposed Gaia project. Respectfully Submitted, Marion Manor Association Gene Walker VP Nancy Grathwohl Sec. Bob Muir cc: P. Moore 1- Gillette Drive/Cleaves Point Access•Road—Emergency Vehicles only must be demanded and enforced. There are many young children(15) residing on Gillette Drivewhose,numbers quadruplean the summer with visiting grandkids. This exit needs to be gated and locked to ensure that it is used strictly for emergency access. 2- Drainage—We have serious problems with flooding on Gillette Drive and do not want that problem enhanced by inadequate drainage at the Gaia site. The original plans contained drainage ponds on the east side and the new site plan has buildings in those areas. How have they accounted for the drainage? Is it adequate? 3- Owner's/Manager's House—The manager's house has been located closer to the shore than in the original plans. It is located where the drainage ponds were initially proposed. We do not believe there is any reason for this home to be constructed so close to the water and there are many environmental reasons why it should not. 4- East side Parking—WHY? If they plan on valet parking, why are they planning for cars driving the perimeter to park on the east? We are concerned this is parking for the "emergency" entrance. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �O_``*�F SOUjyOSouthold,NY 11971. Chair I VO OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR cn ,e 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON G �pQ (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND OIyCOUNTV,Nc Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- StonyBrook" Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry,LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of E!ngiiieeiis From: Amy Ford,Senior Planner 06 MAR 2 4 20 Date: March 23,2006 RE: Agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review- Procedure eviewProcedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revise Site Plan. Below is the site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Oki-Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SC IM# : 1000-38.-7-7.1 This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows;new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building,totaling 80,000 sq. ft.,including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats),plus office and accessoryuses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SC"IM# 1000-38-7-7.1. t Attached is a copy of the site plan application,site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects for your information and review. Thank you in advance. cc: File Enc: Attachments '�1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10,2006. TO'" JIT SOUTHOLD PLANNIi� ,'`BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location �� •,. .r r r�MP'+Xr:.M1Y.4V::bM. w9{..y rsXltrT+.if.•Yi. !m":r�}fir Application Date: 1,201 OCA Cc dQ-i'Qed .. ••„ -u�r, o tl Site Plan Name: 61� /,4 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- - 07 - 7, / TU y,; MAR 1 5 2006 '{ Other SCTM#s: Sa ihalc �r,n 29 �ir Street Address: t �q �/qy� L e Hamlet: s M Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: X New Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number or the people below: Property Owner (kt'- A, Lam. Street ®r'I,o /- 2 ra/r7 /co z-c, , j - o /c City N y . State /V Y Zip�� 3 Home Telephone Other / ra/a - 7 7 7 /1 Applicant Street City State Zip Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)*. Street 5_10 2-0 /J'J411V /2-0 D City &vT7-1'VLjD State M/ -Zip— Office Telephone �/"��, - y33jb Other. )�i,( ,` 70- L16 Ll 3 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2 17L'%-iiyi'l l,: bite Lata , Proposed construction type: New x Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use r�9�cn /tlo P 056'CrKa sS Property total acreage or square footage: Zy, 3:2S- ac./sq. ft. Ma-r7h T J 6 - ('76Y., &77 J��-J Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage:`o�ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No X, If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): 11411 14sr 47reM</ed Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: o? /.;'6 / O(a Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes X No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes X No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: .5� ez-Y4 ecl eml-bi List all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: /t " Existing lot coverage:-X- % Proposed lot coverage: % �2 Sfi� bY;ct concre- yq, /VS—,sp. ,- 57'17V /l.W bWdin Gross floor area of existing structure(s):75 sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):--� 5 Parking Space Data: ,fie-�4t"t-' #of existing spaces: #of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: 'liar � ) Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage: % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes X No If yes explain:AV—k6 knt I, the undersigned, certify that al}-t e ove information is true. Signature of Preparer: ``� - Date: 10/05/05 Page 2 of 2 RII7'T-0Rti794-®'C®NNO,R.ARCHT,"ECTS, AI4 1062!Vorthern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 15'6 Tel (S16) 62.:-6625 Fax. (516) 62.i-6629 10 January 2006 Town of youuhold Southold Town hall lainex PO Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Gaia EIolistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: It is our pleasure to submit to you our applicatio i for the abo•:e referenced project. I would Re to tate this opportunity to tell you some adc itional infor dation about the project that would not be indicated on the drawings at this ti ane. As you are aware,the site i-s located on Gardiners Bay in Ea, . Marion. The 18.7-acre site features a 1000-root shoreliae along,with an exi sting dredges: marina basin. Currently several abandoned and dilapidated structures ex st on the sit.:, The overall site was used for commer„ial purposes and much of the land dam aged Our intc.1ition for the buildings and the site is to seek LIEED ,seen building certification. Upon co:npletion,the prvje.;t will rank among t ie most exc(:;)tional eco-friendly designs in the conn.ry. The project is currently registered ,Adth the US:.iBC under our firm. LEED certification provides a complete framework for assessing b.i Ming performance, site usage and mee.ina sustainability Iyoals It not only ad.;Tresses enegj usage and efficiency but, restoration of the land anc' shoreline, sustainably s site develop:ment,use of local materials and resource 3 in the project,recycling,pollutants, u ater savings. materials selection and indoor environr rental quality. Some of the items,which will be required and i nplemented ::or this project, are the following: rslternative transportation: Two corrimu er shuttle v2 is will be provided for pickup of people coming to;he.site via public transportation. 'herefore parking capacity has been sized not to exceed the minimum])eat zoning .-Cr1irements. Some of the rainimum will be land banked. Bike storage racks ase also provided to encourage noji-invasive travel. rill parking on the site will be by valet(nly. Once a ,)erson arrives,they are Encouraged not to use their car. "he parlcing areas themselves will be of permeable 1;.•avel material which will allow the natural absorption of surface waters not add any runoff pollutants to the soil, i educe heat islands. a Dectric carts Nv>ll be used on site for gett ng around, but walking is preferred. e uttder developing the site, a The current site was abused as an indust.-ial site. We will be restoring the land by a(.ding water features,creating lovely Jal-anese garden s and adding landscaping. 0 'Ve will keep as many existing trees as possible and al l new landscaping will be indigenous and wate efficient. v T'1e shoreline and a large wetlands area i.All be kept r itural and maintained. ® T w existing bulkhead along the bay will be replaced ,vith a more natural stone rip- wrap to match the adjoining property. a Tac new building will be constructed in i he location r f the existing factory so as not tc disturb more of the site than is necess,,ry. A state of the art septic system called Kr omoglass wi .be used. In essence it puts potable water back Lato the site The majority of materials used will be la-,al. w The materials and design style will blenc with the sit,-,. Soft curves,natural colors A 11 pathways inside the site will be nate:al materials. a Energy efficiency is addressed by means of solar hot water and rooftop gardens. The e-ttire energy usage il'or the site will be considered rer :viable energy. a R ecycting will occur. Light pollution is kept to a minimum. L)w level ligli,.ing will be used along to paths a ad parking areas. C.Vater saving fixtures Tin the units. ® Reduction of all cfc.••based refrigerants is implement( 1 in the new hvac systems. Cour d-irectic i is to provide a site in which the harmony of the bt ildings and the landscape reflects and :•estores a natural equilibrium. The elieat's objective is to reduce,recycle and return to the earth what is taken. Should you iave any questions,please feel free to c ontact us. Sinoerely, tr�41 — zz-,� Edward P. FRutt Danita Otr,ba-O'Connor Principal Principal a ser` 3 t x r s, Kv. `• ;:5. �r..� r—•�� ' t* s. .� 4nh r, ,7,, -. i.S IND eek!anm=Munk�l109ts� � f> M. �!tm i9 Q'�7 E41Q iris swum M:BiiBi �M Q 0 id � � k t} W� !! am= ; i�■ isle !s ! Iii = �� 3. s E � � IVE tisaw MMM =mum AL 7 Mtn, llfi-4 IN now memo=EMM MM ns •:r ( I�7�5 FS '� �j €�tic-'� c�i4�t5�+y r.�3r7c:"�5 35�.,.5"$ �65$1�¢�iE��r�A �,�.;'f(f�s..N! k ,..�� I , Wim; ( ar i u I M Asa; w MR E�,t' M M am MM i WN n Tar �, Rxt�fmf�x�F?v� � ; « 191��1i1 Illi. 1 �6.�Sov'Sn�'ktM+. au ii.. 1E13�i�s'�a FAN W&MM1�}tt,L�'#��# I�.��.�'i;'.-,,t%i8�i��; ��€�{6i�ai!l t'.�2'�.Gt�''��` ECi�5>��B�31is■ NNS MMoon now. K$r rY 0 K9 rM ISTf �""'•d• � $fij�E'f es(,.,ea±�giC#i �y'' �> �..s. ',��'�.�;�.�..�;��:�s�F :��. '��3Y��1113C1��6111�®iL!■ s 4F �rr�u�yt�raw.zn'�,�a.. `�� tt � � ��~ � ,{ x' "! t4''x'r ¢.,al . �i.'"�" t.�' & � a It?Pa>r�� _ c �'�€�E P fps g�3 l 3i i a3G7 Bffi1110 H6 i AMMM $Ia€� tfiS'+ ,1P"Iz�.G?�s,sr,s. �' >'"{•G, �.' 7 >.�•s3 rraG+ i ® rf , .S�t€Y:9 FsLi 'i� @'��•�EliRt6d,.Q@ . ,r„s�,I��,, t �;� l: n A t � r rr � *,sift ,ey� h[�'(y�(t $ h S Fu ry 6f „ J � �u g t�% Ell ib Wallis PZ _�r�•.s�y .4 � M �`=.x,tiC MMM `.t.�', c��d`...'t.,ar;'tu�'=.�'•aF`�C+':+.0{u�' a E�ti ��$1+�(�"7•'�`,rxFlY9 ��` h�� :12�ETS3tS1 `�"�iS� ISr� �Gt� �+.'i4gxi`�`�'rice"F..'fs# 'it<^',� " � 1�111�� •-=-+mova 4tl`-�4ic ♦ ♦ • ■ ■ ♦ ♦ ■ 1,rl' vrl '� �� «�n�� i��r•�t�I'"�S7�r'tr ti t rr R(•^a$ �.k.J:� EIL ''a�Mq5y�p{��q =tM iM WHffM M�ga�M,�=iim M■ Emu mamma M M M U IFii m m it i 61f i i , .; r+'=' "log i • ■ ♦ • MM • f - ( �s. G`.'t„- .e„,s!`_ __ .-' `C... ..v--.”. i_w...� •:1i'-•. Eike s. _ r.+ -_.- ..... 517 E C a BE i ULLEM EM — ■ M C- U l�F 220 3 � FT- - - O I I . i RL O 2200 o a I I 8b I ' S USE KEY tr I I — - •i � rn�aMwsu { ^ice, � _ � I I O � O ,.fS.G - - rr-ww.u'c IAMt$H�f�MOTEL ,. °"a� Oy: SOME FATLY FFESO@iCE fWTAURAW a= 16C .�.. - MAMA z O o SfTE PLAN KEY y I SYMBOL BULDIM DESCFWTM FOTRANSMU LOOM- FIVE OOM- ° FESTAUFAW a O RVEuwFs ROM OFRCE 1+2 OC THS MRS SLEEPING ROCIA �evea=`a a-a aDIM 7RAId�RMOTF3"RA-m CAF��A m a 3 0 V I O HALL _— WMATE FFSTAMA"M#EY I I I 11.11 I 111 1 111II 11 1 CCAP6IED DECK (f g 1 POOL FiotFaE u ® MAKrENAWNE Arm lFF1.FFY F3lRDNCi 0 y '} O COVEFM m� I O 1 PLAN! , 2 m E v ® GAZEBO a C�S SGALE: NOT TO SCALE O ;j Mar 23 04 12: 43p Moore Law Office 6317654643 p. 2 PATRICIA C. Illi®®RE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 March 23 , 2004 VIA FACSIMILE Joshua Horton, Supervisor and Southold Town Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Albert Krupski, President Southold Town Trustees P .O . Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P .O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Michael Verity, Building Inspector Southold Town Building Department P .O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE : GAIA Holistic Circle OWNER: OKI-DO, LTD . SCTM 41000-38-07-7 . 1 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: The Planning Board has advised me that it is premature to place the above matter on the March 291h work session. I will advise you of the new work session date when scheduled. We are looking forward to working with you. Very truly yours, fr �0CAI �� Patricia C . Moore P CM� mrn_J CC : 'ski-Do, Ltd. Edward Butt, Architect Mar 23 04 12: 43p Moore Law Office 6317654643 p. 1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C . Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof . If you are not the intended recipient , be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. TO: L Uyyt RE: , Ifs lA Q(�fiC �L� DATE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE . �l �� CLIENT NAME : �"v 1) 1A 4 ,t j�C _ /j OPERATOR: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 17, 2004' . h Geri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: GAIA Holistic Circle Owner: OKI-Do, Ltd SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Chairwoman and Board: The above referenced site plan has been redesigned to incorporate previous comments from the building department,the number of motel units has been reduced to 108. My client intends to create' a world renown spa. The following documents dated March 17,2004 are herein submitted for the Board's review: Site plan with the location of all structures(C-1.0) Zoning & Building Data (C-2.0) Floor plan of Spa ground floor (A-1.1A) Floor plan of Spa-second floor (A-1.1 B) Center building ground floor (A-1.2A) �+ Sleeping units ground floor plan (A-1.3A) Sleeping units second'floor plan (A-1.3B) Spa exterior elevations (A-3.1A) Center building exterior elevations (A-312A) Sleeping Units 'exterior elevations (A-3.3A) Engineered site plan will be submitted once the concept plans have been reviewed and approved by the ZBA(Special Exception) and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Board. This site.plan has on this date been filed with the building department for review and a notice of disapproval in accordance with the newly adopted procedures. My client would respectfully request that this proj ect be placed on your March 291h work session. At that work session the architects and the owner wish to make a presentation to the Board. We would also invite the Trustees and ZBA members to attend this meeting. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore cc: Ruth Oliva, Zoning Board Chairwoman Michael Verity, Building Inspector - Al Krupski, Trustee President Oki-Do;Ltd. Edward Butt, Architect FROM :studio a/b FAX NO. :212 677 7898 iug. 19 2003 01:20PM P1 t 111 Fourth Avenue 24190 Main Road #2M PO,Box 444 New York,NY 10003 Orient,NY 11957 studiod studioab@erathfink.net t.212 677 2887 t & f 631 323 www.newyork-architects cornlstudloeb f.212 677 7898 1426 FAX TRANSMITTAL 4 v to: Mr. Al Krupski Mr. Artie Foster 0 Trustee, Town of Southold 631 765 1892 AUG 19 2003 fax M 631 765 1366 01 from: Hideaki Ariizumi, AIA Southold Town re: Oki-DO meeting Minutes Board of Trustees date: Aug. 19 2003 #pages: 3 (including this cover page) - .Due to the nature of walk-through, this minutes might have issues missed being recorded, Please let us know any issues need to be added. Thank you. FROM :studio a/b FAX N0. :212 677 7898 lug. 19 2003 01:21PM P2 111 Fourth Avenue#2M 24180 Main Roed stu• , , New York,NY 10003 PO Box 444 studioeb@erathllnk net tel,212 677 2887 Oner t,NY 119$7 www,newyork-arohitects,com/studioab fax 212 877 7888 tel.& far 631 323 1426 OKI-DO CENTER MINUTES Town Site Review, Site Observation Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 Time: 9:00 AM_ 10:00 AM Place: Site Present: Firm Tel.# Far# E-mail Al Krupski Trustee 631 765,1692 631 765.1366 Jeff Seeman Coastal 631 653.3399 631 653,3451 ilecoas ftotortline.net Environmental Bruno Semon Town of 631 765 1938 631 765.3136 Southold,Planner Artie Foster Trustee 631 258,7722 631 765.1366 Howard Young Young B,Young 631 727.2303 631 7270144 admin young_engiQeerina,com Hideaki Arllzuml Studio alb, 631 323,1426 631 323.1426 studioaWearthlmk net Architects 212 677,2487 212 677.7898 I. Maritime and Landscape Issues: A. The rip-rap at the neighboring site was observed.A retaining wall inland of the rip-rap would be allowed in order to support land elevations needed, as discussed at the last meeting. B. Al Krupski indicated that more slips than are shown on the plan would be allowable in the dredged basin. Howard Young said no commercial marina is planned. Any slips would be for private use only. C. All Krupski will need to see a landscape plan for the area east of the basin. The intention is to preserve this area as much as possible. Preservation of the"dune"was welcomed. Al Krupski reminded all that preserved areas will also require maintenance, such as clearing new growth unsuitable for a dune, Howard Young mentioned that the plan will be revised by eliminating the "ground welter pond"and minimizing grade changes. D. Al Krupski mentioned that the length of the bulkhead may not extend further into the Bay. It is limited to the location of the existing bulkhead. There are bundled plies in line with the bulkhead. The bulkhead shall not extend to these. Dredging is needed.The dredged sand shall not be removed from the site. It may be used as fill for the site. The course of the basin entry should be reconsidered,since the existing perpendicular form probably will be filled quickly again. Marina contractors may have suggestions. E. On the east side of the basin entry is a sand mound. Most likely this was made from fill by the former dredging. Howard Young asked if it could be removed to open the views or not. Jeff Seeman observed that the mound does not have any plantings that are worth preserving, Al Krupski agreed, since it is not a natural configuration. F. Phragmites were identified on site and wetlands were flagged to the east of'the basin by Jeff Seeman. Y&Y will draw the wetland boundary on the site plan based on the flags. The line will be the origin for the 75 feet setback required by the NYS. For the DEC application,the wetland line, as-well as the rip-rap,should be indicated on the plan. The layout of the units might need to be revised, accordingly. 1 FROM :studio a/b FAX NO. :212 677 lege -lug. 19 2003 01:21PM P3 II. Fire and Emergency Issues: A. Bruno Semon mentioned that the fire track access will also be used for the ambulance access. III. Debris removal It is recognized that there are paint, oil,gas tank, and other debris on site, indoor and outdoor, which might harmful to the environment. They should be removed from the site as soon as possible. Enclosures: Cc: Attendees File: Minutes030812 Site 8/16/2003 2:31 PM Minutes by: H. Ariizumi .5 hrs 8/12103 2 FROM :Studio a/b FA`; NO. :212 6 r 7 898 iu g. 07 2003 01: 13PM P1 111 Founh Avenue 24190 Main Road #2M PO,Box 444 i r i New York,NY 10003 OrleM,NY 11957 sh,dioab@erathllnk net t.212 677 2867 t & f 631 323 www,newyork•archimds,comlatudioab f 212 677 7899 1426 FAX TRANSMITTAL to: Mr. Al Krupski Mr. Artie Foster Trustee, Town of Southold 631 765 1892 fax#:' 631 7661366 from: Hideaki Ariizumi, AIA re: Oki-DO meeting Minutes date, Aug. 7 2003 #pages: 5 (including this cover page) FROM :studio a/b FAX N0. :2'12 677 7898 lug. 87 2083 01: 14PM P2 stu 111 Fourth Avenue#2M 24190 Main Road • • • New York,NY loom PO BOX 444 zirchfteme sludio�lb®erathlink-net lel,212 677 2887 Orient,NY 11957 Www neuyotk-archrrem comMudicab fax 212 677 7899 tel.8 lax 631 323 1426 OKI-DO CENTER MINUTES Town Site Review Date: Thursday, July 24,2003 Time: 10 AM— 12:30 PM Place: Southold Town Hall Present: Name Firm Tel, # Bob Tast Young 3r Young 631 727.2303 Al Krupski Trustee 631 765.1892 James Richter Town Engineering 631 765.1560 Valerie Scopaz Town of Southold -- Planning Scott Seeman Coastal Erivirorimental 631 653.3399 Jeff Seeman Coastal Environmental 631 653,3399 Pat Moore Attorney 631 765.4330 Bruno Semon Town of Southold, Planner 631 765.1938 Artie Foster Trustee 631 258.7722 Mike Verity Town of Southold, Building 631 765.1802 Inspector Victor L'EplaHenier Southold-Planning Board 531 765,1938 Hideaki Ariizumi Studio alb, Architects 631 323,1426 212 677.2887 Glynis Berry Studio alb, Architects 212 677,•2887 I. Maritime Issues: A. Trustees and other Town Departments prefer to review a plan that shows all phases of development, including all slips in the marina. Al Krupski indicated that more slips than are shown on the plan would'be allowable in the dredged basin. Presently a moratorium is in place on all slips, but will most likely end before the application is fully processed. B. AI Krupski mentioned that dredging is needed. Pat Moore indicated that maintenance permits with DEC and the Town are current and coordinated. C. Authorities prefer a rip-rap wall to a bulkhead design. The rip-rap would start at the high water line and extend inland approximately 10-15 feet.A retaining wall inland of the rip-rap would be allowable to support land elevations needed. A conservative approach would use the most landward construction for setbacks when applying for a variance with the zoning board. The rip- rap wall is preferred by DEC as it helps dissipate energy from wave action. D. The Town would have no objection for the use of the end of Shipyard Lane for transitions needed for the rip-rap. E. A site meeting with the trustees, planning board and DEC was suggested for August 12, 2003, time to be determined. I FROM :studio a/b FRX NO. :212 677 7898 -Iu9. 07 2003 01: 14PM P3 F. Phragmites were identified on site and wetlands are currently being flagged on the site by Jeff Seeman of Coastal Environmental II. Fire and Emergency Issues: A. East Marion Fire District had the following issues with the plan: I. Right-of-way access for fire and rescue apparatus to within 100 feet of individual residences was requested. An on-grade alternative for access needs to be considered. 2. Improvements to the existing water supply to supply pressurized water service sufficient to support firefighting requirements is needed. 3. Vehicle access to the beach area is desired in case of emergency. B. Architects noted that 300 feet was allowed if the buildings incorporated sprinklers. Town asked for a chart showing allowable and proposed actions based on NYS codes. The length of ambulatory rescue was also a consideration for the 100-foot request. C. The design of the 20' fire lane may be made of alternative materials if they are capable of supporting applicable vehicle and emergency apparatus weights. D. The 8"water main may not have the capacity to supply fire suppression systems. Access to pond and sea waters may be used for firefighting, Water storage facilities are another consideration, E. Town was pleased with the intent to have the ponds supplied by wells and circulation pumps so that a reliable water supply would be available for pumping in times of drought. Ill. parking A. ADA parking must be shown on the plan.Accessible parking spots should also be located on the northern edge in close proximity to accessible units. B. The parking should be analyzed as to-State code requirements, zoning requirements and proposed spaces. Land banking for future parking spaces may be used to avoid over-building the parking area. C. It is recognized that details relating to internal space allocation are not yet designed. D. Uses that overlap occupancies may be identified for arguments advocating lower numbers of parking spaces. E. Parking for the single residence should be labeled. F. Alternative paving may be used for the parking lots. IV. Site Considerations A. Public water and a community sanitary system will be used. B. The man-made ponds will have slopes gentle enough to avoid classification as swimming pools (zoning definition). Man-made ponds are to be considered non jurisdictional for the Trustees. C. Decks and tennis courts need to be figured as lot coverage items. D. Either flood-proofing or raising floors and mechanical equipment above the flood plain will be needed. The Town prefers raising the structure. This will require major, if not total demolition work to the concrete building. E. Number of units and lot coverage are significantly below the allowable build-out, F. Multiple residences are not permitted on the site. The use shall be for transient purposes. G. Due to the site's past history as an oyster manufacturing plant. Environmental tests will be needed. These will be conducted by both Town representatives and Coastal Environmental. A phase 1 SEQRA review is needed. H. Town welcomed the proposal as it represents an improvement to this disturbed site. I. Town requires the survey to use 1929 data relative to contours (which was used on submitted survey). 2 FROM :studio a/b FAX NO. :212 677 7898 ug. 07 2003 01: 15PM P4 V. Process and Schedule A. Pat Moore will submit to the Zoning Board for a special exception for motel and restaurant uses, fence for the tennis court, setbacks from bulkheads, and waterfront decking. B. The planning board will want to see a site lighting plan and fixture type cuts, as well as landscape schedule, building elevations, roof pitches and signage, C. The footprints should be as accurate as possible. Changes should be within the proposed footprints to avoid repeating the Zoning Board Appeal process and Planning Review, D. 600 sf maximum unit size represents interior space only, not including structure or decks (zoning). The Health Department may have additional requirements if the unit size exceeds 400 sf. E. Units that will be handicap accessible should be identified in the plans. F. A disapproval will be issued so that a variance may be submitted for approval, VII. Health Department Public water main upgrade may be required. Sanitary system decisions must be made very soon, Alternative should be considered and cost of each discussed, Application to the Health Department should be made ASAP. Number of units allowed will depend on the sanitary system selected and public water availability. Enclosures: Sign-in sheet Cc: Attendees File: Minutes030724town 8/7/2003 11:48 AM Minutes by: G.,Berry 2 hrs"7/24/03 3 FROM :studio a/b FAX NO. :212 677 7898 - U9. 07 2003 01: 15PM P5 r 7e —4 L (woo 'Ti - � �l 1`27- Z---J�d 0,�7 tq1 /6.� P S le., -7 G r-. ep F z &(i l � ( 0?5—Ar—L ! T4K,a : a Or/b 2 (1, 617 - aF ? J�e,5 TOW31%; 9- YUrht-2, 5e-E-m,*^► Cm a �� -. vises • l�3 -CS3-.?3 :3 S,' A ;+ ROBERT _MUIR 2850 GILLETTE DISE EAST MARION,NY 11939 James P.Dina_President October 14 26 Town Trustees Southold,N-Y. 11971 President King: Re.Gaia Circle Oki-Do proposal Nancy and I have been property owners on Gillette eve since 1961 and webuilt a summer home in 1971 and retired full time in 19U Okki:DoT wilt bee our back fence neighbors and the emergency exit fiom the property at Cleaves Point Road is our property line on the south. We have several serious concerns with the project_ We want the"Emergency Exit"to be Gated and locked with access only - -- - - --- - - for-emergent activities. We have 60 residences in Marion Manor,now F777 ;7wily fully developed wi&many young families and more than 16 young A"i _ playing in the streets,waiting for the school bus,or on their way t�be�h_ Additional traffic ficin the Spa or daring coition would i T 1 006create a very dangerous (t; situation -- _ We have had Serious drainage problems wheht tyre are-heavy rams or » Northeaster storms_ Close attention to the control of the flow of water at _• --the Spa is required in order that the flooding situation not be increased. The promoters claim that this entity will be"Profit-Alakirig7 and wily be a taxpayer for all local services including SchooK Fire its.etc. This must be guaranteed even if it later becomes a non-profit org. We have followed the progress closely and have:written,several:letter to the Planning Board and the Zonmg Board of Appeals,-copies are ached- Alsaw there-are 4 photos taken after the October 2005 rainstorm to show the extent of the flooding on the Oki Do property as well one showing the road end at Clewes Point Road and the yards of the two adjacent houses_ We appreciate any input and oversight you may be able to furnish as this Project progresses. In addition to being an immediate bordering neig)Aw and taxpayer,I arm also a Dkettor of The Marion Manor Property Owners Associatim and the District Tw&wu of the Oysterponds School District. Respectfully-submitted, /Qt'� -r RODERT E_MUIR 2850 GILLETTE DRYVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 Ms Jeri Woodhouse,Chairman, OctobmM,2006 Planning ward Southold,NY 11971 Dear Chun Woodhouse: Re: Gaia Circle-Oki-Do As a longe resident and adjacent puperty owner I Ding to your atienfian three continuing concerns-with the current proposal_ 1. Drainage and the overflow onto the bordering Gillette Drive properties 2 The necessity to have the Emegency Exit onto Cleaves Point Road be.a truly Gated and Restricted entrance. 3 There be a provision for continued Tax Basis for the property no matter what the use designation i_e.nm profit or health related use This is particularly'important for thebecnefnt of the-School Distrid and other fim protection and support services to our community. I have written to The Planning lid and The`honing Ion of s,des These comments,are still valid phis thew additional thoughts. r Also enclosed ace pictures taken after the October 2005 storm which left our area,and the Oyster Plaut property under 2 feet of water for the southem 1./3 of the propel The water table is only 4 R below ground in much of the area and planning to handle the amount of rain in one of the huge storms cannot be contained with dry wells that are only 4 feet deep_ Thew is already a dry welt at the end ofthe paves portion of cleaves point Road and that is not adequate at the presenti, Respectfully submitted, Robert and.Nancy Muir OCT 1 6 2006 2850 Gciffette-Drive East Marion,NY 11939 March 2, 2006Ms Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson 1 Zoning Board of Appeals OCT 6 2006 Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 - Dear Ms. Oliva Re: Gaia Circle aka Oki-Do Property in East Marion (Formerly Oyster Farm) As residents of over forty years combined, Robert F. Muir and Joseph Licciardi are writing this important letter to insure the Board has first-hand information from actual residents who border the property Our combined properties, Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Marion Manor, total approximately 620 feet of exposure to the property. We have experienced flooding in this area numerous times from heavy rains. The water gathers along the eastern portion of the property and slowly seeps into the ground. This area is a natural low'-lying drainage area for the surroundings. The oyster shells in the area should be removed to increase the natural drainage the wetland provides. Also, not mentioned or noted anywhere, is the existing earthen berm protecting the homes on Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road from flooding. The original drawing submitted by Oki-Do, stamped"received 7/29/2003"had a drainage pond located in the southeast corner wetland area of the property. It has been removed in the new drawings. In its place the new drawings reflect 3 buildings in the general area. The drainage pond from the original plans should be restored and possibly enlarged and situated to run North-South as this is the primary wetland drainage area. Relocating the three buildings in the new drawings away from this wetland and Positioned more as the first drawings reflected would benefit us all. Additionally, the original proposed road, which entered the property from Cleaves Point Road, only turned to the right(North) in the original drawings. The updated drawings now have the road running North and South from Cleaves Point Road. The southern part of the road is our primary concern, as it will pave over the lowest lying portion of the property, reducing the natural drainage, which is so critical to our properties and environment. The last storm, October 2005, caused the Oyster Farms lot to flood, the overflow then spilled out flooding homes and properties along Gillette Drive and Cleaves Point Road.We strongly believe that placing solid structures, foundations, paths and a roadway will cause major water problems for the neighbors as well as the owners of the Oyster Farms property. According to the ground elevation plan, the southeast corner and up along the eastern property line is at some places as low as two feet above sea level. We hope our comments to the Board will allow an opportunity to review the impact to the environment and assist in improving the situation for all involved. Sincerely, Robert F. Muir Joseph Licciardi 2850 Gillette Drive 50 Cleaves Point Road East Marion, NY 11939 East Marion, NY 11939 ROBERT F IRUIR 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE Phone 631477-0075 EAST MARION.NY 11939 Email muirbob@optonlme.net Ruth D. Oliva-Chairperson July 05,2004 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 'Subject: GALA CIRCLE formerly OKI-DO Dear Ms. Oliva:, This is a follow-up to my letter of September 05,2003 now that a revised plan has been submitted under toe name of GA IA CIRCLE. In addition to my previously stated concerns I add the following: 1. The plan calls for 107 living units in the Spa and the cottages plus 3 houses for managers. Allowin 2 people Per unit this would allow for 220 residents in addition to the 200 seat restaurant. This would seem to be a higher density than our Community could support giving the potential additional demand on our police, fire, g P ple emergency services. P ,and other 2. The addition of a"Gas Dock" to to marina area would seem to be an unnecessary potential pollution an danger to a concentrated residential area. P d fire 3. The pools or ponds would be decorative but would there be mosquito breeding areas. enough water circulation to avoid mos q eeding 1 4. There must be a permanent commitment to keeping the property as a tax producer and not allow it to ever be a "non profit"health related facility as San Simeon did to avoid property taxes. Your consideration of these concerns will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Robert F.Muir OCT 1 6 2006 x_ ROBERT F MUIR Home Phone 631 477-2225 2850 GILLETTE DRIVE Email mu�rbob@optonline net EAST'MARION,NY 11939 September 05,2003 Lynda A. TortOra, Chairperson Zoning-Board of Appeals OCT 1 6 2006 Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,Ny 11971 Dear Ms Tortora:, Reference is made to the OKI-Do a wife,Nancy Muir and I are he o application for the property located on Shi the Tax Ma bac owners Of lots#6 and#7 on the original MarionManorard nsubdivie,Eat siionlor NNY My o.29.1 on P ung up to the OKI_DO property in question. We are concerned with the following; I. The Emergency g y Road with the outlet on Cleaves Point Road and Gillette Drive. nature of the Emergency Exit. Our streets and nan-oma,and would not be able to was allowed to become a co our reservation is the families with small children?nmon entrance or exit, Our area is rapidly becominanpportthe additional traffic if this We would strenuously object if the streets became a major g fullydeveloped or entrance.any We understand the need for an Emergency$tet Road but urge that it be a limited Manager's house will be located very Gillette and turn right onto Cleaves int Road expecting °f the road. lmlted or gated exit,since the if large construction vehicles were allowed during the ing ittWe have seen too many cars come down xpee it to be a connecting road. It would be doubly dangerous building period. The object of becoming a Holistic Cen Provide a quiet,relaxing atmosphere for their y walkways,not roads for access to the buildings is to distraction if there was a regular exit and entrance off Cleaves Point Road. gueststerwith only Continuous traffic around the perimeter road would be a 2. Drainage is also a Potential shells and dirt alon easrproblem. You will note that there is a"berm"consisting mostly of oyster g the southeastern border of the property to keep and the adjacent properties. Also the Town Hi eP water from draining onto Cleaves Point Road Portion of the road to help control the drainage and t Department constructed a" g and the flow of water during heavy��stowellrmsat the end of the paved We purchased Lot#6 on the`Map of Marion Manor" the original house in 1988 when it became our full time residence. August 13, 1963 and built our house in 1971. We enlarged Point and would object to any widening We have enjoyed the peaceful existence to this connecting Cleaves Point Road g°f the streets to accommodate more traffic that would be caused by the acceptable solution. Generali with OKI-DO as a regular,entrance or exit. Y find the proposal to be very well planned.An emergency exit would be an Sincerely, ROBERT F_MUIR 285®GILLETTE DRIVE EAST MARION,NY 11939 Ms Jeri Woodhouse,Chairman October M,2006 Planning Board Southold,NY 11971 Dear Chairman Woodhouse: Re: Craia Circle-Oki-Do As a longtime resident and adjacent property ownerl bring to yourattention three continuing concerns with the cent proposal_ 1. Drainage and the overflow onto the bordering Gillette Drive properties 2 The necessity to�have the Emegency Exit onto Cleaves Point Road be a truly(fated and Restricted entrance-- 3 There be a provision for continued Tarr Basis for the properly no utter what the use designation i°ee nonTroEt or-health related use_ This is particularly important for the beneEt of the School,District and,other Ere protection and support services to our community. I have written to The Planning Board and The Zonffig Board of Appeals,copies attached- These comments are-still valid plus these additional thoughts_ r Also enclosed are pictures taken atter the October' 2005 stormt which left our area,and the Oyster Plant properly under 2 feet ofwater for the southern 1/1 of the property_ The water table is only 4 ft below grand in much of the area and planning to handle the amount of rain in one of the large storms cannot be contained with dry wells that are only 4 feet deep_ There is already a dry well at the end ofthe paved portion of Cleaves point Road and that is not adequate at the present'=. Respeaffilly submitted, I jr�J) L Robert and Nancy Mum ; OCT 16 2006 2850 ettc Drive East Marion,NY 11939 Jul 14 06 11 :42a f" -e Law Office 63 - —65 4643 p. 2 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 TO: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Robert Kassner Legal Assistant Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary July 10,2006 J U L 1 4 20,016 Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Dain Road, Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle OKI-do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President King and Board: Thank you for meeting with the architect and me. In accordance with our discussion the following suggestions and comments were made at the June 21,2006 work session : 1. Shipyard Lane could be terminated at the southerly terminus of the proposed south entrance of the property. The Town presently has a guard rail at the end of Ship Yard Lane. This would enable drainage structures to be installed within the town road, landward of the current road end, in order to address road runoff which is presently entering the Bay. Due to the extensive drainage that is being undertaken on site;additional drains for the benefit of the Town capturing some road runoff presently entering the Bay could be undertaken by the applicant. This proposal is subject to the review and recommendation of the Torn Engineer and Highway Superintendent. 2. Due to the historic use of the property and the existing conditions of the property and structures, the Board had no objection to the location of the buildings, as proposed on the site plan. \ A� ftp CP _1__ 3. , The Board had no objection to replacement of the dilapidated bulkhead along the Bay and the proposed construction of Rip Rap to match the rip rap on the adjacent property,subject to a permit. 4. We discussed the need of a retaining wall, landward of the rip rap, in order to match the existing elevation of the existing grade of the property. Due to the replacement of the 4 06 11 : 42a Mi - -e Law Office 631 :5 4643 P. 3 7 ' bulkhead with Rip Rap,the Trustees had no objection to the retaining wall landward of the rip rap. �-- — S. The condition of the existing bulkhead within the Private Boat Basin appears to be adequate and will not need replacement. Also the existing foundations are being reviewed for reuse. Th,existing foundations will require extensive engineering because the first floor of any habitable structure will require compliance with FEMA. 6. �We confirmed that a Phase I and Phase_II_E��vironmental Assessment has been completed at the property and no hazardous substances were noted. — Very truly yours, Patricia C.Moore cc: Denita O'Connor Cramer Consulting Group -� JUL i 1 i Y .,,,i.��'' 'z r�,-•/��' 1��. �-�"/ �{1 i� Ilrn y'r ��, /�rfl Town of Southold -- „ Notice of Public Scoping Meeting; OCT 10 2006 GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. MEETING DATE: Monday, October 16, 2006 at 4:30 P.M. LOCATION: Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,Southold, NY 11971 The Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency-pursuant to Part 617 of the State regulations for Article 8,the State Environmental Quality Review(SEAR) Act of the Environmental Conservation Law, has scheduled a public meeting for the purpose of determining the scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to be prepared for the proposed action described in this notice. The Town of Southold Planning Board has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a SEAR Positive Declaration requiring the applicant to prepare a DEIS. APPLICANT: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SCTM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS/APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NYS DEC) 401 Water Quality Certification (NYS DEC) Excavation and Development Permit (Town of Southold) Building Permits (Town of Southold) Site Plan Approval (Town of Southold) Site Soil Monitoring and Management Plan (SCDHS &DEC) Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- StonyBrook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervis6r Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry,LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner,NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms &9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space,retail gift shop,27 personal service treatment suites and accessoryuses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private A GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd. Page Two October 10, 2006 guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features,replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the NIII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 PROJECT LOCATION: The subject propertylies in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, Countyof Suffolk,New York The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane,immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane, 50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II (M-2) District. MEETING PURPOSE: The purpose of"scoping"is to focus the DEIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or non-significant. Some environmental impacts to be considered for evaluation in the DEIS are identified in the Department's Positive Declaration and in the project Sponsor's (Patricia Moore, Esq.) Draft Scoping Document. Scoping will help to ensure that this DEIS is a comprehensive,accurate and complete document, adequate for public review and which properly evaluates the environmental impacts that may occur if the proposed landfill expansion is approved. PUBLIC MEETING: The public scoping session will be held on Monday, October 16,2006 at 4:30 P.M., at the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971.Statements from local government officials, legislators,interested and involved agencies, and the public will be heard after a Planning Board Chair Statement is read into the record and the applicant gives a brief presentation detailing the proposed project. A stenographic record of the meeting will be prepared.Written statements will also be accepted until October 26,2006 at the Town of Southold Planning Board office address at the end of this notice. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION: The application file may be reviewed by appointment at the Town of Southold Planning Board Department. In addition,the applicant has provided a Draft Scoping Document containing a summary of the SE QR process,including scoping,the project proposal and some potential environmental impacts. The applicant's Draft Scoping Document has not been approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board. It is being presented at this time for public review and comment. Copies of this Draft Scoping Document have been mailed to involved and interested agencies. In addition,the document maybe reviewed at the Town of Southold Planning Board,54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 and Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971. Anyone who plans to participate in the scoping meeting by providing comment is urged to review a copy of this document prior to the meeting. The scoping meeting location is reasonably accessible to persons with a mobility impairment. Interpreter services will also be made available to deaf persons, at no charge,upon written request to the Contact Person named at the end of this notice,within one week prior to the meeting, l GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. Page Three October 10, 2006 pursuant to Section 202(1) of the State Administrative Procedures Act. All persons having an interest in this project are urged to attend or be represented either individually or collectively. NOTICE DATE: October 10,2006 CONTACT PERSON: Bruno Semon,Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board P. O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Telephone: 631-765-1938 DRAFT SCOPE 2006 FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OCT 1 "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR TRANSIENT MOTEL----,,, SHIPYARD OTEL--- SHIPYARD LANE,EAST MARION, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - SUFFOLK COUNT', NEW FORK Overview This document is a Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") for a proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The proposed action includes the construction of a 114-room motel in 24 buildings, with a related restaurant, a pool,personal services facilities, a private marina with 16 boat slips, maintenance and utility building, and a manager's residence. The proposed motel property would be aesthetically improved with a man-made lake, Japanese gardens and native landscaping. To ensure that the DEIS will address all significant issues, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, as lead agency,has elected to conduct formal scoping pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8. As such, the applicant is required to prepare and submit this Draft Scope to the lead agency which provides a description of the proposed action and the applicants' proposed content for the DEIS. Thus, this Draft Scope has been prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.8 and sets forth the following: • Brief description of the proposed action; • Potentially significant adverse impacts; • Extent and quality of information needed to adequately address potentially significant adverse impacts; • Initial identification of mitigation measures; and • Reasonable alternatives to be considered. 1 The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: Agency Approval Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Road Work Permit Department Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Sewage Treatment Plant Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection New York State Department of 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Environmental Conservation Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit 3 Soils and Topography The Soil Survey of Suffolk County will be reviewed to determine soil classifications on the site and in the project area. This section of the DEIS will assess the soil type(s) on the site and the associated engineering limitations using the Soil Survey of Suffolk County and available soil boring logs. Topographic information will be included as obtained through review of relevant USGS Maps and available site-specific topographic surveys. A thorough narrative description of potential adverse impacts to soils and topography and strategies to minimize impacts will be included in this analysis. Changes in topography that would occur, including a quantitative characterization of the cut and fill required, will also be provided. Water Resources To adequately assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed development, the recommendations of the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study) will be reviewed for applicability and consistency of the proposed action therewith. The DEIS will also discuss the relevancy of the Special Groundwater Protection Area(SGPA)Plan. Furthermore, the consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated. Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. Regional and local hydrogeology conditions and regional water quality will be discussed. Depth to groundwater and direction of flow will be determined. The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority,will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand. 5 the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. In addition,protected native plants,plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. As part of this assessment, the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program will be contacted to obtain available information on significant natural resources on the site or in the surrounding area. Once the existing conditions data are obtained, future changes expected to any natural resources on the site and/or in the surrounding area will be assessed. Specifically, this section of the DEIS will evaluate the impacts of the proposed plan on the terrestrial ecology of the area. Land Use and Zoning This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. A physical description of the property(size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; a land use study of surrounding areas; description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning. As part of this effort, relevant land use plans and policies, including the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program,will be reviewed. Specifically,this effort will evaluate applicable comprehensive plans and master planning efforts. This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings,parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. 7 10. A trip assignment analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 11. Capacity analyses at key signalized and unsignalized intersections in order to examine their ability to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed Gaia Holistic Center. 12. A review of the access arrangements. 13. An evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed parking to meet the demands of the proposed use. 14. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. Community Facilities and Services The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: • Police; • Fire and Ambulance Services; • Water supply; • Sanitary; and • Solid Waste. The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services. The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. 9 Water Resources • United States Geological Survey. 2002. Water Table of the Upper Glacial Aquifer on Eastern Long Island. • Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan • Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan • Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) • Nonpoint Source Management Handbook • Flood Insurance Rate Maps • NYSDEC Freshwater and Tidal Wetland Maps • National Wetlands Inventory Map • Consultations with the Suffolk County Water Authority • Suffolk County Sanitary Code and other applicable regulations • Consultations with NYSDEC and ACOE Ecology • Site inspections by a qualified bio I ogist/ecolo gist • Consultations with the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program Land Use and Zoning • Available and relevant comprehensive plans (zoning maps, codes, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, etc.) of the Town of Southold and Suffolk County • Site and area inspections Transportation • Traffic counts • Accident data review • Projections of site generated traffic using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation, Seventh Edition or any subsequent edition • Highway Capacity Manual 11 agencies and interested parties can comment on the proposed sections of the DEIS, below is a proposed table of contents: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 3.0 Existing Environmental Conditions 3.1 Soils and Topography 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecology 3.4 Land Use and Zoning 3.5 Transportation 3.6 Community Facilities and Services 3.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 4.0 Probable Impacts of the Proposed Action 4.1 Soils and Topography 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecology 4.4 Land Use and Zoning 4.5 Transportation 4.6 Community Facilities and Services 4.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 5.0 Mitigation Measures 6.0 Alternatives and their Impacts 6.1 No-Action 6.2 Development in accordance with prevailing zoning 7.0 Unavoidable Adverse Effects 8.0 Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources 9.0 Growth Inducing Aspects 10.0 Use and Conservation of Energy 13 Town of Southold Notice of Public Scoping Meeting GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. MEETING DATE: Monday, October 16,2006 at 4:30 P.M. LOCATION: Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971 The Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agencypursuant to Part 617 of the State regulations for Article 8, the State Environmental Quality-Review(SEAR) Act of the Environmental Conservation Law, has scheduled a public meeting for the purpose of determining the scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to be prepared for the proposed action described in this notice. The Town of Southold Planning Board has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and has issued a SEAR Positive Declaration requiring the applicant to prepare a DEIS. APPLICANT: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do, Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane,East Marion SCTM# : 1000-38-7-7.1 STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS/APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NYS DEG) 401 Water Quality Certification (NYS DECD Excavation and Development Permit (Town of Southold) Building Permits (Town of Southold) Site Plan Approval (Town of Southold) Site Soil Monitoring and Management Plan (S®HS &DEC) Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC- StonyBrook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry,LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State File PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms &9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space,retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessoryuses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private � . \ GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd. Page Two October 10, 2006 guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building,a sanitarywaste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M# 1000-38-7-7.1 PROJECT LOCATION: The subject property lies in the hamlet of East Marion,Town of Southold, County of Suffolk,New York The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane, immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane,50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II (M-2) District. MEETING PURPOSE: The purpose of"scoping"is to focus the DEIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or non-significant. Some environmental impacts to be considered for evaluation in the DEIS are identified in the Department's Positive Declaration and in the project Sponsor's (Patricia Moore, Esq.) Draft Scoping Document. Scoping will help to ensure that this DEIS is a comprehensive, accurate and complete document, adequate for public review and which properly evaluates the environmental impacts that may occur if the proposed landfill expansion is approved. PUBLIC MEETING: The public scoping session will be held on Monday, October 16, 2006 at 4:30 P.M., at the Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road,Southold,NY 11971. Statements from local government officials, legislators, interested and involved agencies, and the public will be heard after a Planning Board Chair Statement is read into the record and the applicant gives a brief presentation detailing the proposed project. A stenographic record of the meeting will be prepared.Written statements will also be accepted until October 26,2006 at the Town of Southold Planning Board office address at the end of this notice. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION: The application file may be reviewed by appointment at the Town of Southold Planning Board Department. In addition, the applicant has provided a Draft Scoping Document containing a summary of the SEAR process, including scoping,the project proposal and some potential environmental impacts. The applicant's Draft Scoping Document has not been approved by the Town of Southold Planning Board. It is being presented at this time for public review and comment. Copies of this Draft Scoping Document have been mailed to involved and interested agencies. In addition,the document may be reviewed at the Town of Southold Planning Board, 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 and Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,NY 11971. Anyone who plans to participate in the scoping meeting by providing comment is urged to review a copy of this document prior to the meeting. The scoping meeting location is reasonably accessible to persons with a mobility impairment. Interpreter services will also be made available to deaf persons, at no charge, upon written request to the Contact Person named at the end of this notice,within one week prior to the meeting, i 4 GALA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do,Ltd. Page Three October 10,2006 pursuant to Section 202(1) of the State Administrative Procedures Act. All persons having an interest in this project are urged to attend or be represented either individually or collectively. NOTICE DATE: October 10,2006 CONTACT PERSON: Bruno Semon,Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Telephone: 631-765-1938 k I ..h O r. J40 Lz �. MK 1 ` Nuutz.1t a' K ti 2` ' t r`,. .�f.'1. ,� � �✓�.. ` '`! .L Ali 04 ,,'' Y 40, _ � r S-�- �_ MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS tpF SO P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �� OlO Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS y� Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON 'Ol • �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND ye'nUNT`I,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �"', November 6, 2006 i - Patricia C. Moore, Esq. I t` NOV m 8 2006 51020 Main Road _ Southold, NY 11971 E r ^i 4r�is;Fe� Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki-Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 6, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit- motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of, the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; and WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Planning Board adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI-DO) Page Two November 6, 2006 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2006, that pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant agents will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 held a public scoping meeting from 4:30p-6:00pm and allowed for comments to be received at the Planning Department up to October 26, 2006; be it therefore RESOLVED, pursuant'to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold as reflected in the estimate of Nelson Pope & Voorhis dated October 30, 2006, subject to modification; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8 adopts the FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT prepared by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC dated November 6, 2006 and require that the agent address all issues. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ?erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board New York State Department of Transportation Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Suffolk County Water Authority Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Town Engineer Architectural Review Committee Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Army Corps of Engineers Commissioner, NYS DEC Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services Rnvironmental Notice Bulletin Department of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw File Enc: Final Scope F c — 1 . C WIT ti s a° fr�auxriA�+? NELSON,POPE & VOORHIS, LLC Environmental Consultant to the Planning Board ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Town of Southold, New York 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE,NY 11747-2188 (631) 427-5665 FAX(631)427-5620 npv@nelsonpope com FINAL SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" Proposed Special Exception Permit for Transient Motel Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 (631) 765-1938 Prepared by Nelson,Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 (631)427-5665 Contact: Charles J.Voorhis, CEP, AICP Date: November 6, 2006 1.0 Introduction This document is the Final Scope of the issues and analyses to be included in the DEIS for the proposed transient motel on a 17.325-acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk known as Gaia Holistic Circle. The analysis of the Gaia Holistic Circle project in a DEIS has been required by the Town of Southold Planning Board, as Lead Agency for administration of the subdivision review and as required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The requirement for a DEIS was contained in a Positive Declaration issued by the Planning Board on September 11, 2006. The information prepared in conformance with this scope and the SEQRA process is intended to provide comprehensive input in the decision-making process for use by involved agencies in preparing their own findings and issuing decisions on their respective permits. The document Gaia Holistic Circle' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be concise but thorough, well documented, accurate and consistent. Figures and tables will be presented in support of the discussions and analyses contained in the document. Technical information will be summarized in the body of the DEIS and attached in their entirety in an appendix. 2.0 Brief Description of the Proposed Project The proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. A parking area containing 162 spaces is proposed along the length of the western property line and extending into the northwest portion of the site. A total of 27 stalls will be landbanked for future parking area expansion. The practicality and adequacy of the proposed parking lot location is not known at this time, and may vary based on the proposed site uses and duration of guest stay. Three (3) ingress/egress points are proposed along Shipyard Lane. An additional gated ingress/egress point is proposed from Cleaves Point Road along the eastern property boundary. A loading dock will be provided at the transient hotel building and will be accessible from the proposed access point located at the southwestern corner of the property. A 20-foot wide interior, gravel roadway is proposed along the northern and eastern property line to connect the parking lot area to the Cleave Point Road entrance. It is not known if the Cleave Point Road access will be utilized for emergency access only, or if this access will be utilized for through traffic and maintenance vehicles. Ornamental landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including the required minimum twenty-foot buffer of supplemental landscaping and natural vegetation maintained along the eastern and northern property perimeters and required minimum 15-foot buffer is proposed along the western property line. The proposed project also includes repairing/replacing the existing wooden bulkhead that extends along the western half of the boat basin and adding boat slips along a new dock. This portion of the bulkhead is in fair to poor condition. The wooden bulkhead indicated on the Site Plan along the southwest property boundary fronting Gardiners Bay is dilapidated and no longer functioning. This portion of bulkhead will be replaced with a rock revetment to match that located on the adjacent Cleaves Point Village property. Information regarding NYSDEC jurisdiction and permitting is discussed in the Wetlands section below. Any dredging or removal of fill from the access channel or the boat basin will require acquisition of all the applicable PcrrPage 2 FNV WFNT s vooFu ea��- FNVIi"ibNMFNTAI,•Pl_lNVIViN'.,i CC7nM1:t A,Ttf.t» Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement permits from the Town Board of Trustees, the Army Corps of Engineers, the NYSDEC, and the NYS Department of State (discussed in the Wetlands section below). A large manmade pond, containing a landscaped island, several recreational bridges and wooden decks are proposed in the central portion of the property. The water feature will be accessible from several different paths throughout the site and will be surrounded by Japanese Gardens and native landscaping. A drainage system of catch basins, leaching pools and piping is proposed throughout the site. A wastewater treatment facility is proposed for the northwest corner of the site. However, no sanitary calculations are provided in the plans. Additionally, a series of leaching pools and catch basins are proposed for Cleaves Point Road, in the vicinity of the proposed entrance. The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster-processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster-processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. Approvals In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: A..enc A araval ' N. Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Department Road Work Permit Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Health Services Article 4 Water Supply Article 6 Sewage Treatment Plant Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 1. Notice of Intent—SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 3. Tidal Wetlands Permit 4. Mining Permit for Ponds (if applicable) NYS Department of State Coastal Consistency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual Permit h Page 3 NEL,,oN Yrnc s vooFv eE,u..c F.rwipanniEr�ru...ra_nNrvmrz.ror�s�xnr.+c. Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 3.0 Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts The following description of the potential adverse impacts of the proposed project has been taken verbatim from the Planning Board's Positive Declaration of September 11, 2006: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • Site and architectural plan and architectural elevation drawing prepared by Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects, • Part I and II of the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), • Site plan application, • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering, • Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)Report prepared by Longshore Environmental, • Site plan use diagram, • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects, • Independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The NYS Heritage Program Database Records indicates there are no known rare species or ecological communities located within the project area; however, historical and recent records indicate the presence of several threatened and endangered vascular plants and birds in the vicinity of the project site. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the site's location on Gardiners Bay / Orient Harbor, potential Page 4 NCLZION Fl=F[6 VCXD l 6,'.'i LLC EPNIRCXVN.FIVTAL.F'1_ANlytfYi C.CJN4.A.TIN(: Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as it relates to water quality, harbor use and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project had a preliminary evaluation in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the East Marion Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. shall also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. NYS OPRHP has noted that the area of the proposed project has not been comprehensively surveyed and recommended that a Phase I archeological survey be conducted unless sufficient evidence of substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in energy use Impacts to local facilities shall be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site an addition to use of public streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, as well as community character. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, proposed site uses, possible public access to site facilities like the restaurants and duration of guest stay have not been specified. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. N"- Page 5 .tOOFy Ru LLC ENVIPONMFNTRL.•F[ttNNifK:.CIXVSLATING Gaia Holistic Circle` Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment,no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does propose a significant physical site alteration and the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Alternatives to the proposed action that will reduce potential impacts shall be examined. 4.0 Organization and Overall Content of the DEIS Document The DEIS must conform with the basic content requirements as contained in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). The outline of the DEIS shall include the following sections: COVER SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Background,Need, Objectives and Benefits 1.1.1 Background and History 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives 1.1.3 Objectives of the Project Sponsor 1.1.4 Benefits of the Project 1.2 Location and Site Conditions 1.3 Project Design and Layout 1.3.1 Overall Site Layout 1.3.2 Grading and Drainage 1.3.3 Access,Road System and Parking 1.3.4 Sanitary Disposal and Water Supply 1.3.5 Site Landscaping and Lighting 1.3.6 Open Space 1.4 Construction and Operation 1.4.1 Construction 1.4.2 Operation 1.5 Permits and Approvals Required a POrs E 5 V0QF4 PS LLC Page 6 �ruvl nn tvrw...P1, .Co M6 Tjl , Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2.0 NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 2.1 Soils and Topography 2.1.1 Existing Conditions 2.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.2 Water Resources 2.2.1 Existing Conditions 2.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 2.3 Ecology 2.3.1 Existing Conditions 2.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 2.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.0 HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 3.1 Transportation 3.1.1 Existing Conditions 3.1.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.2 Land and Water Use, Zoning and Plans 3.2.1 Existing Conditions 3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.3 Community Facilities and Services 3.3.1 Existing Conditions 3.3.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.4 Aesthetic Resources and Community Character 3.4.1 Existing Conditions 3.4.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation 3.5 Historic and Archaeological Resources 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.2 Anticipated Impacts 3.5.3 Proposed Mitigation 4.0 OTHER REQUIRED SECTIONS 4.1 Construction Related Impacts 4.2 Cumulative Impacts 4.3 Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided 4.4 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 4.5 Growth-Inducing Aspects 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Action Alternative 5.2 Alternative Site Designs 6.0 REFERENCES APPENDICES NC �PL d"PS Page 7 EN"MCNYs„-RAJN -- C;(JM1IFtt B,TING» Gaia Holistic Circle' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 5.0 Extent and Quality of Information Existing and Needed As required under SEQRA, the DEIS shall include "a statement and evaluation of potential significant adverse impacts at a level of detail that reflects the severity of the impacts and the reasonable likelihood of their occurrence". Included in this evaluation shall be reasonably related short-term and long-term impacts, with other required sections identified in the Section 6.0 of this scoping document. This section further describes the level of analysis and the type of analysis expected with respect to the key environmental impacts of the project as outlined in the Positive Declaration. Each major section is followed by a description of the extent and quality of information needed to perform the evaluation of each of the impacted resources. Description of the Proposed Project Background and History • There shall be a brief description of the site and application history; this shall include a full description of the existing and historic use of the site, dredging and site improvements, status of current use, site ownership and related background and history. • Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments related to site conditions shall be summarized and attached or excerpts attached to establish background conditions; site remediation shall be identified. Public Need and Municipality Objectives • Include justification of proposed project in terms of Town goals for site. • Public need for the project shall be discussed; indicate market study used to assess the need and viability of the facility; indicate potential for conversion of site to other use based on non-viability of facility or lack of need. • Population served by the project shall be identified. • Public access to the waterfront shall be discussed. Objectives of the Project Sponsor •, The objectives of the project sponsor shall be included and discussed. • The objectives of the project sponsor shall indicate the Gaia Holistic Circle form of treatment/lifestyle as related to site use and design. Benefits of the Project • Include a discussion of the community benefits expected to accrue from the proposed proj ect. Location and Site Conditions • Using appropriate mapping and/or tables, describe location of site, in terms adjacent/nearby significant properties, zoning and service districts, available services, etc. • The existing conditions of the site in terms of bulkheads, mean high water, mean low water, site survey, structures, vegetative cover shall be provided as an overall background of existing site conditions. • A summary of subsurface conditions and features, suspected contamination on the site and in the area proposed for development, as well as remediation initiatives. FaeLsoN pAr+c&vOCru ne LLC Page 8 r_rwntacmlNs�rrs+c..ra..arv�mc:.c-.orac-,arnvca - Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for-the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Project Design and Layout • Overall Site Layout - include a brief description of the site and project layout; describe basis for site yield, proposed structures, services, utilities, access points, road system, drainage, marina and include a site quantities table. • Use Design/Description - address breakdown of use areas from a structural standpoint; indicate if the "patio' will be covered; describe any retail activities on site (sale items, access to public). • Architecture- the architecture, height and appearance of structures shall be identified. • LEED - Details on the LEED green building certification being sought for this project. • Regulations - ADA compliance features and FEMA Flood Plain development compliance as related to structural improvements; indicate requirements, design parameters and proposed design; indicate first floor elevations of buildings required and proposed. • Dredging - details on dredging and bulkhead project; dredge spoil, volume and quality; dredge spoil dewatering, dredge spoil disposal. • Marina and Bulkhead/Revetment - the marina installation shall be fully described including bulkheading and revetment (including cross sections, materials used, stone size, bulkhead type, backfill, etc.), dredging, piles and floats, access, function; etc.; indicate if fuel tanks will be installed anywhere on premises and who will have access. • Grading - the grading program and associated areas disturbed shall be discussed along with volumes of soil excavated, cut/filled, removed from site and maximum depths of cut/fill; fill needed for sanitary, drainage or structures shall be identified; grading for the proposed access to the managers residence shall be outlined; quantity of fill behind proposed bulkhead. • Drainage - site drainage and proposed drainage system and provide capacity and function information shall be provided along with a discussion of conformance to NYSDEC SPDES stormwater and erosion control regulations for construction and post-construction conditions; use of the lake/stream system for drainage shall be identified if intended as well as function, capacity and viability in view of depth to groundwater constraints. • Lake/Stream System - details on the lake and stream system, method of construction/lining; water supply; soil removal/re-grading, design and depth of features, make-up water and source, vector control, filtration/treatment equipment, stocking with fish and species, wildfowl control, stormwater retention qualities if applicable; vegetation and landscaping. • Access - the vehicle access points, internal roadway layout and traffic circulation shall be identified. • Parking - the adequacy of on-site parking shall be discussed; required parking as required by a breakdown of parking requirements for each sub-use shall be provided; this will establish the basis for the parking variance; the amount and adequacy of proposed parking shall be determined; use of permeable pavement shall be described in detail in terms of location and use; identify the location of loading docks and dumpster locations. • Water Supply - include a description of water supply source, infrastructure and availability, water main routing to access the site; irrigation well water supply, lake/stream "make up" water, and proposed-wastewater handling and corresponding use of water supply and sanitary design flow. r,uSCN FOFr&„P 0-- Page 9 r�wiw7rvnieavrAL•vt.�rartmM.mcmni�.a rnvc: i Gaia Holistic Circle' Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Utilities - the sizes and locations of all utilities and services shall be described along with the status of future possible connection. • Lighting - the Town lighting requirements, proposed lighting and an illumination analysis shall be provided and described for all aspects of the project including parking areas, the restaurant and other site improvements; compliance with "dark skies" shall be identified. • Landscaping - information on the type, amount and location of landscaping proposed shall be provided as well as information on maintenance requirements such as irrigation and fertilization under operation and maintenance; information on buffers around the site perimeter, retention of existing trees and other buffering techniques shall be identified; the plant list shall be reviewed and described to ensure that "invasive" species are not introduced to the site; screening of dumpsters, recreational activities and parking shall be addressed. • Amenities — describe all amenities on site including outdoor use, tennis courts, arenas, playgrounds,use of beach and limits on off-site use of facilities, etc. • Open Space Management - include a discussion on retained open space areas; areas of dedication, areas of retention by applicant; easements or restrictions to ensure retention of open space. Construction • The construction and operation/maintenance of the site shall be fully discussed. • Demolition of the existing buildings including safety and protection of neighboring properties. • Remediation based on the Phase FII ESA. • Project phasing (if applicable). • Method of construction, construction schedule/timetable, days of the week; indicate Town code restrictions of nuisance activities and compliance. • Construction management, equipment storage/staging, delivery routes, hours of operation, workers' parking,protection of natural and sensitive areas. • Protection of workers and worker safety during construction shall be evaluated. • Need to modify overhanging trees on Shipyard Lane for construction or operation. • Quantity of soil import/export, truck routes, management and mitigation. • Dredging and bulkhead project details; staging areas; construction methods; dewatering areas; disposal areas; dredge removal truck trips; time frames for construction. Operation • In terms of operation, describe the management and protection of open space; describe Organization management and operation; describe road, landscape and open space maintenance practice, describe any special conditions which may apply. • Detailed description identifying which of the site uses (if any) will be open to the public (i.e., the marina, restaurant, spa, etc.) and which will be exclusive for hotel guests. • Uses expected of various locations and facilities within the site; seasons of use, intensity of use, whether the site will be open to special events such as weddings, conferences or catering events,retail sales. • Projected number of employees required for the various uses for weekdays, weekends and seasonal peak periods. ZLJE cN0g LLO Pa a 10 . �.�� _, .1, Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Indicate activities such as outdoor parties, placement and use of loudspeakers, concerts or special events including frequency, location time periods and schedule. • Truck sizes expected for deliveries and delivery routing, delivery times and truck unloading areas. • Location of dumpsters, truck access to dumpsters, hours of dumpster pickup shall be addressed; indicate if trash compactors will be used. • Details on internal traffic circulation plan, use of gravel road and general on-site activities. • Description of use of golf carts on site. • Valet parking shall be fully described. • Description of any generators proposed for the facility. • Description of operation of the proposed marina, users, frequency of use, etc. • Seasons of operation of various components of the facility. • Lighting operations in terms of type, hours lit and controls shall be discussed. • Snow removal shall be described as related to parking surfaces and operation. • Entity responsible for site operations. • Restrictions on Emergency Access (if proposed) and how the restrictions will be ensured. • Lake/stream system operation and maintenance; lake "make-up" water; fish stocking; wildfowl population control; nutrient influx control; mosquito/vector control; aesthetics. • Water use shall be fully described including: maximum size of vessels, turning radius, depths, vessel speeds in marina, potential for increased number of private vessels docking, channel enhancements (increased dredging potential, navigation aids), and access to existing navigation channels. • Use and management of open space areas. • Operation of the marina shall be identified; indicate if fuel storage will occur for marina patrons. Permits and Approvals Required • Identify all required permits and reviews • Indicate the filing date and status of submissions to the lead and involved agencies. Natural Environmental Resources Soils and Topography • Existing soil, subsoil and topographic conditions shall be analyzed in terms of existing conditions, proposed conditions and measures which may be employed to minimize potential significant adverse environmental impacts. • The existing soil types shall be determined pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey. • Soil borings shall be described to determine subsurface soil quality and depth to groundwater. • The topography of the site shall be determined using site specific topographic surveys of the property. • The soil quality shall be described in terms of analytical results from Phase II sampling. 4,'4r 11 NC!-£SON WPCPEVNT 6 VODf-li NE LLC �-`MPs-"NVNENTAL.PLAIVIVtNC:.[.CH'JRl-R TIPYe Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Impact to soils shall be discussed in terms of soil constraints pursuant to the Suffolk County Soil Survey based on the type of land use proposed and the constraints for each soil type. • Constraints in terms of depth to groundwater shall be evaluated by establishing that sanitary and drainage systems can function property; vertical profiles of these systems establishing minimum surface elevation, maximum groundwater elevation and system installation to required design standards shall be included. • Topographic alteration of the site shall be determined through evaluation of the grading proposed for the site and determination of resultant slopes, volume and disposition/origin of cut or fill, and proposed changes to topographic elevations; impact of fill for sanitary, drainage and buildings shall be evaluated; evaluation may include description, profiles, contour maps and/or other methods to perform effective evaluation; impact of grading for the proposed managers residence road shall be evaluated. • Mitigation in terms of soil remediation, erosion control, retention of soils, fugitive dust and related impacts shall be identified. Water Resources • The groundwater management zone as classified under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code shall be referenced. • The depth to groundwater in key development locations of the site shall be determined by use of on-site soil borings; soil borings in all areas of proposed leaching must be included given constrained site soils, fill, oyster shell, etc. • The expected direction of groundwater flow based on hydrologic interpolation shall be identified. • The existing groundwater quality shall be referenced from existing literature. • The water supply source, infrastructure and availability, service provider and capacity of systems shall be established through communication with the water district and analysis of impacts; water main routing and growth impacts must be evaluated; irrigation water, well installation and impacts must be examined. • The expected impact of the project with respect to water quality shall be fully examined in terms of sanitary discharge compliance, wastewater treatment system operation and regulatory requirements. .• Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified in terms of density and current policy on the proposed wastewater system, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. • Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. • The nitrogen budget for the site (considering all potential sources of nitrogen) shall be determined using mass-balance modeling methods. • Other water quality impacts related to pesticides, snow melt chemicals (if applicable), chemical storage and any other sources shall be analyzed. • The consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated as related to stormwater management and discharge. • The existing stormwater management system and surface drainage conditions on the site OW, tico1-CM s vbbF*Js LLC Page 12 kNVlf?G'1NMEN7AI-.M`'LA�+11NC:.CC]M1iti A.TiNC3 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be described. This will include, but not be limited to: stormwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition, post-development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of stormwater to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for stormwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stormwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the NYSDEC SPDES GP 02-01 Phase 2 stormwater regulations. • The change in hydrology of the site in terms of quantity of recharge under existing and future conditions shall be established using appropriate hydrologic analysis methods; use of the irrigation well, drawdown and potential for salt-water intrusion shall be included; drought conditions water consumption and impact to neighboring private wells; issues regarding increased water table elevations, functioning of sanitary/drainage recharge systems and potential to increase flooding in the area shall be addressed. • Constraints and impacts related to depth to groundwater must be evaluated; depth of leaching structures (sanitary and stormwater) placement to ensure minimum 2-3' above the water table, capacity and function shall be considered. • The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority, will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand; the evaporative loss of water from new surface water features, pond "make up" water, irrigation and all water use shall be included. • As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. • Area conditions in terms of drainage and potential for or reported flooding shall be described. • As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included; the Flood Zone line shall be interpolated based on "on-site" topography and shall align with the nine (9) foot contour. • Impact of flooding on sanitary system function, generator function, and restaurant/hotel/cottage evaculation. • Mitigation measures which may reduce potential water quality impacts shall be identified; measures to correct existing flooding and assurance that flooding will not be exacerbated shall be included; resurfacing of Shipyard Lane and installation of drainage in the Town right-of-way shall be considered as mitigation; drainage mitigation for area of Cleaves Point Road near east part of site. Ecology • Existing upland habitats shall be inventoried through an inspection of the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. �4jp� l NCL, IC �6�a� L- Page 13 ENVIFiglVN,EN'('AI..PLAI�WII�CS COhISI_A.TING: Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • In addition, protected native plants, plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. • The NY Natural Heritage Program shall be contacted for site file information concerning habitats, plant and animal species. • Impact to upland habitats shall be quantified and discussed qualitatively in terms ecological impact to plants and animals. • The type, quantity and quality of wetlands present on, adjoining, or in the vicinity of the site shall be mapped and described using current site conditions and recognizing that the location of high water has moved landward; wetland jurisdiction of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established; existing biological conditions of proposed dredging areas including submerged aquatic vegetation. • The jurisdiction, regulatory framework and controls of the Federal government, State and Town shall be established. • Hydrologic systems supporting these wetlands shall be presented. • Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the NYSDEC as well as the Town Trustees. As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ALOE, NYSDEC and Trustees must be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. • Potential impacts to wetlands shall be evaluated in terms of maintaining or enhancing all wetlands, maintaining adequate setbacks and ensuring that the hydrology of the systems (sanitary, stormwater, erosion control, etc.) supporting wetlands is not degraded in quality or quantity. • Water use impact must be evaluated including: marina impacts associated with installation and operation, adequacy of navigation channels and boat access to site as well as boat maneuvers within site; include assessment of available pumpout facilities. • Historical dredging of the basin and historical depth of the basin shall be documented to establish pre-existing conditions to support the proposed "maintenance" dredging; impact of dredging on vegetation and wildlife including osprey nests shall be evaluated. • Dredging and bulkhead project impacts of construction; installation/spoil removal; dewatering (odor and vector control); dredge spoil placement/disposal; dredge spoil quality (grain size, organic content, volatile/semivolatile organic compounds, metals, PCB's and related contaminants) shall be included; impact of the proposed revetment on surrounding properties shall be determined; analysis shall include physical and biological littoral processes and impact on submerged aquatic vegetation. • Setbacks required by State and Town wetland review shall be located and evaluated in terms of compliance with maintaining setbacks for disturbance/fertilized vegetation, structures and sanitary installation. • Management of the land within wetland setback areas shall be formulated to ensure conformance with the code requirements. • Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts shall be identified and method of implementation determined; details on erosion control to protect site ecology shall be included. Page 14 t.IEL.-.S,CX i'OPE 6-F 65 LLC ENVI(--{41VNENrAL•PL.ANMKi.CAhISI-�TIlVG: I`\ ` Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Human Resources Transportation • Provide a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The study shall consider future traffic associated with employees, guests, visitors, and all aspects of site operations. • Include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. • Sight distance at site and Shipyard Lane and Route 25, road/lane width, circulation and parking shall be included in this analysis. • The Traffic Impact Study will include: collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: 1. Several personal, on-site held observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. 3. The hourly volume report of the NYSDOT traffic count on Main Road shall be obtained and included in the traffic study. A review of the count should be performed and the peak hours occurring on the weekday and weekend should be identified. 4. The following should be included as study intersections with turning movement counts and analysis conducted during all the time periods: • Shipyard Lane and Main Road; • Gillette Drive and Main Road; • Cleaves Point Condominium driveway and Shipyard Lane. 5. In addition to weekday AM and PM peak period counts, Saturday peak period intersection turning movement counts at the study intersections should be conducted during the afternoon and/or evening peak periods identified by review of the Main Road hourly volumes. Sunday is not typically the busiest weekend day. However, the hourly volumes should identify which day should be included in the study. 6. Hourly volumes for a seven day period should be collected on Gillette Drive and Shipyard Lane. 7. Perform a gap study at the study intersections during the peak periods to record available gaps in traffic along Main Road. 8. The accident analysis should include a request for accident records along Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive, at both intersections with Main Road and along Main Road for an appropriate distance in either direction from each intersection. The accident records should be reviewed and tabulated. 9. The trip generation calculation should be conducted based upon each of the separate uses on the site, such as, the restaurant, marina, spa and hotel. The hours of operation, size of each facility, maximum employees during peak activity, and whether the facility is open to the public should be identified. Any credit assumed for internal trips should be supported with documentation. The data from the Hotel Land Use Code provided by ITE is not appropriate. 10. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the NEk..t"C,tl7 K'OY'E 6`VdOFV 8a L4C Page 15 EPNIFY}MIVETITAL•F'LANNi .CIXJSI.A TIIVC< Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement surrounding street network. 11. A trip assignment analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 12 Capacity analyses at the study intersections and site accesses should be prepared using the most recent version of HCS software available. 13 Analyze and evaluate the following alternative site access configurations: • Alternative driveway configuration to consolidate two driveways into one located farther north from the Cleaves Point Condominiums. • Alternative south end driveway location to avoid conflicts with public access to the road end. • Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for alternate access in addition to employee access to distribute vehicle trips. • Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for emergency access only. • Consideration for use of the combination of Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive as a separate ingress and egress from the site. 14. An evaluation of the adequacy and convenience in terms of practical parking operations related to the proposed parking shall be evaluated to determine if it will meet the demands of the proposed use. Evaluate potential for parking needs to spill to off-site locations. 15. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. • The following potential impacts shall be included in the traffic study: ➢ Day use of on-site facilities such as the spa. ➢ Public occupancy of restaurant seats; feasibility of restricting public use to 72 of 98 seats. ➢ Accurate trip generation factor more specific to proposed use than hotel due to intense support for amenities specific to this use and not characteristic of a hotel. ➢ Justify any credit taken for LEED certification rideshare or public transportation. ➢ Impact of driveway locations and specifically impact to the Cleaves Point Condominiums shall be assessed and disclosed. Land and Water Use, Zoning and Plans • This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. • A physical description of the property(size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. • This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; the existing land use character of the site and surrounding area within 1,000 feet shall be described and mapped. • The zoning which applies to the site and the area within 1,000 feet shall be described and mapped, and a description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning shall be provided. • Land use plans which pertain to the project site shall be outlined and discussed in terms of their general intent and applicability to the project site. • This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. NELSONWF" 6-; 66.LLC Page 16 ENVIRONNE_NTAL P1,iaf�N}NC:.CCxvEld.TttYG Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement • Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. Information on buffers, retention of existing trees and other buffering techniques shall be identified as well as adequacy of screening of dumpsters, recreational activities and parking; impact of the manager residence access road on adjacent properties shall be evaluated. • Impact associated with the marina operation shall be evaluated in terms of activity, lights, noise and community land use compatibility impacts. • Noise of the operation of the project shall be included as an impact analysis related to land use compatibility, specifically the parking areas, dumpster locations and pickup and internal site circulation as related to residential receptors in proximity to the site. • The existing zoning, requested special permit, zoning requirements, parking requirements, and special permit criteria shall all be evaluated in detail including required parking, loading docks and other related zoning dimensional and use parameters. • The conformance of the project with land use plans shall be evaluated and discussed. The DEIS shall address and demonstrate compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and policy guidelines found within the Town Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Implementation Strategy, 208 Study, Suffolk County Sanitary Code, Long Island Groundwater Management Program, USEPA Phase 1 Rule as administered by NYSDEC under SPDES GP-02-01; NURP Study and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook, NYSDEC SPDES regulations and local objectives to include Town of Southold Code requirements. The intent of these studies and applicability to the project site shall be determined. • Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) conformance shall be evaluated in a detailed stand-alone subsection addressing relevant policies; the Town LWRP coordinator letter of October 25, 2006 is attached for guidance. • Measures which may be used to mitigate potential land use, zoning or impacts with respect to land use plans shall be provided. Community Facilities and Services • The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: ➢ School District ➢ Police; ➢ Fire and Ambulance Services; ➢ Water supply; ➢ Sanitary; and ➢ Solid Waste. • The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services; ability of services to address emergency needs of site. • The document shall address job creation and the number of employees, and determine the impact if a large number of employees from outside of the area may be necessary to �* roc s v 8E LLC Page 17 L-nlvif�vvvEN{nL.PI.�NNiNG.ccx'st.a rirxa Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement operate the facility(housing, schools, etc.). • The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. • The existing tax revenue of the site shall be established. • The DEIS shall consider future taxes, and if it is expected that the use will not be taxed, a determination shall be made to determine if payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) is necessary to offset potential impact to community service providers. • The emergency services (ambulance, police and fire) which serve the site shall be identified and contacted for input with respect to continued ability to serve the site. • Changes associated with the proposed project shall be evaluated in terms of emergency service access; a practical approach shall be taken to ensure that safe and efficient emergency service vehicle access to the site can be provided to the site. • Hydrant installation/location and other development considerations which assist in addressing emergency services shall be included. • Mitigation for emergency service access to ensure that equipment can ingress/egress the site shall be included. W,/,O*0- 47fNV S Page 18 rNViRS cC j___x rlNd t' Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Aesthetic Resources and Community Character • The importance of the site in terms of open space character in the community shall be established; the type of open space which the site represents and locations of other open space in the community shall be used in this evaluation. • The visual character of the existing site conditions shall be identified through ground and aerial photography using a key for locations of all ground photography. • The significance of visual character shall be established in terms of the viewing public and view accessibility. • Other aspects of the existing visual character in terms of vegetation, lighting, utilities, etc. shall be identified. "Dark sky" compliance shall be addressed. • Impacts of the proposed project in terms of community character and visual setting shall be determined by discussion as well as graphic methods. Locations shall be determined through analysis of significance to the viewing public, but at a minimum shall include the view of the site from Gardiners Bay. "To scale" photographic and architectural renderings are anticipated, with supporting cross-section evaluation and descriptive text to fully disclose the change of visual character of the site. • Impact of shadows of large buildings shall be evaluated. • The impact of use of fill, 'increase in site elevations, and visual appearance of structures will be evaluated. The significance of visual impacts will be assessed and mitigation proposed. Lighting impacts will be discussed from a visual impact perspective; the "dark sky" compliance shall be evaluated as well as the potential for a "glow" or "halo" effect from parking areas, the restaurant or other site improvements shall be addressed. • The change in character and visual setting shall be determined in terms of landscape vegetation, lighting and utilities. • Impact associated with the marina operation shall be evaluated in terms of activity, lights, noise and community land use compatibility impacts. • The existing noise environment will be evaluated in terms of ambient noise, sensitive receptors and community character. The potential noise impacts of the project will be assessed through identification of source areas, traffic circulation/volume, golf carts, car doors, backup alarms, building/grounds maintenance, restaurant, waterfall, generator use, dumpster location, trash compactors (if used) and use, proximity to receptors, distance and other attenuation, and the significance of potential noise impacts will be assessed. • Impact of special events (if proposed) shall be evaluated in terms of community character. • Impact of gas dock (if proposed) on community safety and pollution potential in consideration of the surrounding area. • Population/demographic impacts associated with the use of the site. • Measures to minimize the impact of loss of open space and change in visual character and the means for their implementation shall be provided. Historic and Archaeological Resources • The historic and archaeological resources of the site will be addressed through a determination of historic and archaeological sensitivity and preparation of a Stage IA/IB Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA). The site is within an area of archaeological *TfRS LLC Page 19 ET'MF QNNENIN..P1,s>NNi=•CON—M.&TING Gaia Holistic Circle , Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement sensitivity and therefore a Stage IA/IB is required, unless significant ground disturbance is documented to the satisfaction of the OPRHP. Any mitigation which may be needed shall be identified. 6.0 Other Required Sections In addition to the key resources identified in the Positive Declaration, SEQRA identifies other required sections for a complete DEIS as included in 6NYCRR Part 617.9 (b)(3). Mitigation measures shall be included with respect to each key impact area as noted in Section 5.0. Alternatives to be studied are identified in Section 7.0. The following Other Required Sections and evaluations shall be provided in the DEIS. • Construction Impacts (Describe the impacts related to construction demolition, construction, dredge operations, dredge spoil disposal, noise, dust, erosion and sedimentation, area receptors, applicable nuisance regulations, applicable agency oversight and safeguards, phasing of the project, staging areas, parking areas, operation areas, duration, hours, and related mitigation measures to reduce construction impacts). • Cumulative Impacts (Describe other pending or approved projects in vicinity (East Marion), determine potential for impacts due to implementation of proposed project in combination with others and discuss/analyze impacts). • Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided (Provide brief listing of those adverse enviromnental impacts described/discussed previously which are anticipated to occur, which cannot be completely mitigated). • Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources (Provide brief discussion of those natural and human resources which will be committed to and/or consumed by the proposed project). • Growth-Inducing Aspects (Provide brief discussion of those aspects of the proposed project which will or may trigger or contribute to future growth in the area). 7.0 Alternatives to be Studied SEQRA requires a description and evaluation of the range of reasonable alternatives to the action that are feasible, considering the objectives and capabilities of the project sponsor. As noted in SEQRA, "The description and evaluation of each alternative shall be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed". The following alternatives and methods of evaluation are anticipated: • No Action Alternative - Alternative whereby the site remains in its current condition). • Potential Acquisition of the site. • Alternative Design(s) - Design(s) which incorporate(s) features or combinations of features to provide the following reduced impact alternatives: ➢ Alternative which conforms to LWRP. 9 Alternative design to conform to a 75 foot impervious/structure setback from current location of wetlands and placement of the rock revetment above mean high water. �,`'S�M`'°;,E.9:CX�96, LL C«�.,�a„� Page 20 Gaia Holistic Circle Preliminary Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ➢ Alternative parking layout to provide convenience to proposed use areas and reduce impact to neighboring residential properties (more interspersed parking). ➢ Conversely, consider an alternative to centralize parking and provide internal operations to provide access to user access to site uses in order to better locate and buffer parking and reduce off-site impacts. ➢ Alternative design to reduce impervious surface area (particularly the pool patio area) to increase indigenous landscaping and reduce stormwater, groundwater and wetlands impacts. ➢ Alternative to remove separate cottages near east property line. ➢ Alternative with reduced building mass of the large building to reduce visual impact. ➢ Reduction in site lighting design to reduce perimeter lighting, impact to Town roads and adjacent properties. ➢ Alternative building locations to ensure FEMA compliance with less use of fill. ➢ Alternative dumpster locations to reduce impact on neighboring properties. ➢ Alternative driveway configuration to consolidate two driveways into one located farther north from the Cleaves Point Condominiums. ➢ Alternative south end driveway location to avoid conflicts with public access to the road end. ➢ Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for alternate access in addition to employee access to distribute vehicle trips. ➢ Consideration for the use of the Gillette Drive driveway for emergency access only. ➢ Consideration for use of the combination of Shipyard Lane and Gillette Drive as a separate ingress and egress from the site. ➢ Removal of entire length of bulkhead extending seaward of upland property. Attachments Useful in Document Preparation • Town Engineer Review Letter of August 25, 2006 • Town LWRP Coordinator Review Letter of October 25, 2006 • Department of State Review Letter of October 17, 2006 Comments, Issues and Scope Items Deemed Not Relevant • Increase in sea level due to global warming. • Eminent domain issue. This document is intended to fulfill the lead agency requirements for issuance of a Final Scope in accordance with SEQRA Part 617.8. The document assists the lead agency in evaluating the DEIS for content and adequacy for public review and assists the applicant in understanding the extent and quality of information needed to evaluate the proposed project and allow the lead agency and involved agencies to obtain the information necessary to reach an informed decision on the project. rPage 21 stroN Pd�+c s vooFp n��a �MFl�Nv�7Vrru_.afwrvinr:.GIX14t.1,TINCi a MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QF so�Ty P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �DVv Old Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L EDWARDS C.47 NC Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G • 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON 'Ol (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND y�'DUNT`l,�c� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals h �!_� =. Town of Southold Board of Trustees •�1-- __ Mike Verity, Chief Building InspectorNOV2006 Jyr From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: November 6 , 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle at East Marion SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M-II This proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-38-7- 7.1 The LWRP identifies the former Long Island Oyster Farm site at the foot of Old Shipyard Lane as a underutilized commercial property. It is discussed in detail in Subsections 7 and B Section V Subsection 7 states "the abandoned fish processing site at the foot of the Shipyard Lane at Cleaves Point, has great potential to provide additional public access to the water as a Town marina. The Heavy use of the ramp at gull Pond Inlet suggests a need for more good Boating access between Greenport Village and Orient Harbor." In addition the LWRP identifies the site in section B. Summary and Conclusions; Item 1 Opportunities for land use changes: as "having potential to be developed into a multi-use facility accommodating water enhanced recreational uses as well as the typical water dependent uses allowed under the existingzng This site is also a 1 s feasible location for a Town marina. Public ownership of this site may be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood than commercial operation. It would also provide access within this reach" The action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action supports most of the policies of the LWRP, however, the proposal is INCONSISTENT with the below Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP based upon the following: Policy 4. Minimize loss of human life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. ,. Policy Standards 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. The term Water-dependent use means a business or other activity which can only be conducted in, on, over, or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves, as an integral part of such activity, the use of the water. Existing uses should be maintained and enhanced where possible and appropriate. Portion of the property are located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area as identified by the NYSDEC Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Ma. Portions of the Transient Motel building, proposed outdoor terrace, a portion of the parking area and leaching fields are all proposed seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. It is recommended that the structures be relocated to the greatest extent practical to meet the above policy and sub- policies 2. Avoid reconstruction of structures, other than structures that are part of a water-dependent use, damaged by 50% or more of their value in coastal hazard areas. The Transient Motel and accessory uses are proposed to be built within the footprint of the Oyster processingfacility. The use is not a "water 2 7 s i dependent" use. However, the percent of value loss has not been provided and therefore a recommendation on whether the proposal meets this policy cannot be made. The proposed marina is a water dependent use. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for: a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. The Transient Motel, restaurant and other accessory uses do not require a coastal location and therefore are inconsistent with this sub-policy. It is recommended that the structures be designed and/or located to avoid flooding and erosion hazards. b. water-dependent uses which cannot avoid exposure to hazards. The proposed marina is the only water dependent use within the proposal. There is no ability to relocate the marina. C. sites in areas with extensive public investment, public infrastructure, or major public facilities. A public use is not proposed and therefore the action in inconsistent with this sub-policy d. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical. The applicant proposes to reconstruct the main building which houses the Transient Motel, restaurant and other accessory uses within the original footprint of the Oyster processing facility. However, the building is located within Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9, an "Area of Special Flood Hazard". It is recommended that the applicant amend the proposal to the greatest extent practical to avoid and/or mitigate all potential flooding and erosion hazards. 5. Manage development in floodplains outside of coastal hazard areas so as to reduce adverse environmental effects, minimize the need for future structural flood protection measures, or expansion of existing protection measures and to meet federal flood insurance program standards. The main building which houses the Transient Motel restaurant with other accessory uses, sleeping units 16C 17C and 18C the pool house and pool and the Transient Motel private cafeteria are located in Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9, an "Area of Special Flood Hazard" Therefore the proposed action is inconsistent with the above policy and sub-policies Flood Zone AE Zone Elevation 9 corresponds to the 100 year flood Tains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study y detailed methods A 3 100 year flood refers to an elevation that has a 1% chance of being exceeded or equaled each year. It is recommended that the applicant ainend the proposal to the greatest extent practical to mitigate all potential flooding hazards. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. C. Minimize interference with natural coastal processes by: 1. providing for natural supply and movement of unconsolidated materials and for water and wind transport 2. limiting intrusion of structures into coastal waters D. A limited interference with coastal processes may be allowed where the principal purpose of the structure is necessary to: 1. simulate natural processes where existing structures have altered the coast 2. provide necessary public benefits for flooding and erosion protection 3. provide for the efficient operation of water-dependent uses Limited interference is to be mitigated to ensure that there is no adverse impact to adjacent property, to natural coastal processes and natural resources, and, if undertaken by a private property owner, does not incur significant direct or indirect public costs. 4.3 Protect public lands and public trust lands and use of these lands when undertaking all erosion or flood control projects. A. Retain ownership of public trust lands which have become upland areas due to fill or accretion resulting from erosion control projects. (However, in situations where erosion control projects have created public land updrift, but also resulted in damage or erosion to public lands and public trust lands downdrift of the control structure, the public benefit of that structure or project should be re-examined and appropriate modifications made as conditions suggest.) Public lands on the property involve all waters of the state up to the high tide mark. The placement of channel bulkheads entering the marina has caused the re- nourishment of the beach to the northeast of the bulkheads (updrift) and the severe erosion of the beach to the southwest of the channel bulkheads (downdrift). This area has eroded to landward of the shoreline east/west timber bulkhead forcing the low/high tidal range to move landward from the historic location. The high tide mark is now located north of the failed shoreline east/west timber bulkhead. The alteration of the tidal range on the property is a direct result of the channel bulkheads and therefore it is recommended that the length of the bulkheads in the channel be re-evaluated to allow the beach to naturally re- establish and improve public access in the area southwest of the channel. 4 i B. Avoid losses or likely losses of public trust lands or use of these lands, including public access along the shore, which can be reasonably attributed to or anticipated to result from erosion protection structures. The beach to the northeast of the channel bulkheads is accessible to the public to the northeast bulkhead. The beach southwest of the channel bulkheads has significantly eroded. The erosion of the beach coupled with the large amount of hardened shoreline structures severely limit public access. It is recommended that the length of the channel bulkheads be re-evaluated to allow the beach to naturally re-establish. 4.4 Manage navigation infrastructure to limit adverse impacts on coastal processes. A. Manage stabilized inlets to limit adverse impacts on coastal processes. 1. Include sand bypassing at all engineered or stabilized inlets which interrupt littoral processes. 2. Avoid extending jetties when it will increase disruption of coastal processes. 3. Consider removing existing jetties when they do not protect existing water-dependent uses and disrupt coastal processes. As indicated above the channel bulkheads have disrupted the normal sand drifting patterns and have caused adverse impacts to the natural coastal processes. The length of both the north and south bulkheads should be re- evaluated and re-designed to improve the natural sand downdrift process to the greatest extent practical to meet the above sub-policy. B. Design channel construction and maintenance to protect and enhance natural protective features and prevent destabilization of adjacent areas. See above response. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. 5.3 Protect and enhance quality of coastal waters. A. Protect water quality based on an evaluation of physical factors (pH, dissolved oxygen, dissolved solids, nutrients, odor, color and turbidity), health factors (pathogens, chemical contaminants, and toxicity), and aesthetic factors (oils, floatables, refuse, and suspended solids). In June of 2005, a Phase II Environmental Assessment report was prepared for the site by Longshore Environmental Inc. The report concludes that the site contains MTBE's areas of petroleum impact and levels of copper and zinc that exceed NYDEC recommended soil cleanup objectives. 5 One concenl with the results listed in the report is that soil analysis was not performed at all areas containing nderground storage tanks, including a 10,000 gallon Diesel underground storage tank. It is strongly recommended that the Board require a that soil analysis be conducted for all underground storage tanks storing petroleum products and require that a remediation plan to clean up the contaminated sites be submitted to the Town.. In addition, it is strongly recommended that any dredge spoil and fill soils be tested for contaminants prior to use on site. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction. 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The proposed setback from the Transient Motel building to the bulkhead is XXX feet. The proposed setbacks from the Transient Motel cafeteria building is 55 feet from the wood decking to the bulkhead; from 16c, 17c, 18c sleeping rooms the setback cannot be accurately determined until the wetland jurisdictional boundary has been established by the Board of Trustees . A minimum setback of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chanter 275 and a minimum setback of 75 feet is required by Article XXIII Section 280-239B of the Town of Southold Town Code. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent possible Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. 8.2 Manage hazardous wastes to protect public health and control pollution. C. Remediate inactive hazardous waste disposal sites. Future use of a site should determine the appropriate level of remediation. The Town's Site Plan application process will uncover inactive hazardous waste disposal sites. Remediation efforts will be specified during the environmental review of those sites prior to development or redevelopment. 8.3 Protect the environment from degradation due to toxic pollutants and substances hazardous to the environment and public health. 6 J r A. Prevent release of toxic pollutants or substances hazardous to the environment that would have a deleterious effect on fish and wildlife resources. The Town's Site Plan application process will determine whether proposed land use activities will involve toxic substances. Protection measures to prevent their release to the environment, particularly fish and wildlife resources, will be determined during the environmental review. Further, the dredging of toxic material from underwater lands and the deposition of such material shall be conducted in the most mitigative manner possible so as not to endanger fish and wildlife resources, in either the short or long term. E. Take appropriate action to correct all unregulated releases of substances hazardous to the environment. In June of 2005, a Phase II Environmental Assessment report was pared for the site by Longshore Environmental Inc. The report concludes that the site contains MTBE's areas of petroleum impact, and levels of copper and zinc that exceed NYDEC recommended soil cleanup objectives. One concern with the results listed in the report is that soil analysis was not performed at all areas containing underground storage tanks including a 10,000 gallon Diesel underground storage tank. It is strongly recommended that the Boards require that a soil analysis be required for all underground storage tanks storing_petroleum products and a remediation plan to clean up the contaminated sites be submitted to the Town Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. The LWRP states that "public ownership of this site may be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood than commercial operation It would also provide access within this reach". The property and proposed use is private,• there is no proposal to enhance public access or recreational use of coastal waters so therefore the proposal as submitted is inconsistent with the above policy. Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. 10.1 (a) Protect existing water-dependent uses. The term Water-dependent use means a business or other activity which can only be conducted in, on, over, or adjacent to a water body because such activity requires direct access to that water body, and which involves as an integral part of such activity, the use of the water. Existing uses should be maintained and enhanced where possible and appropriate 7 Proposed Marina: The plan incorporates a marina use which is a water dependent use that requires direct access to the water body. Therefore the marina use is consistent with 10.1 (a) above . 10.1 (b) Improve the economic viability of water-dependent uses by allowing for non-water dependent accessory and multiple uses, particularly water enhanced and maritime support services where sufficient upland exists. The term Water-enhanced use means a use or activity which does not require a location adjacent to coastal waters, but whose location on the waterfront adds to the public use and enjoyment of the water's edge. Water-enhanced uses are primarily recreational, cultural, retail, or entertainment in nature. These uses may be necessary for the successful financial operation and viability of water-dependent uses. Proposed Transient Motel: The proposed transient motel use is a special exception use in the MII zoning district and a water enhanced use. The use is also non-water dependent, however, it improves the economic viability of the marina and overall project and therefore is consistent with the above sub-policy. Proposed Restaurant: The proposed restaurant use is a special exception use in the MII zoning district and a water enhanced use. The use is also non-water dependent, however, it improves the economic viability of the marina and overall project and is therefore, consistent with the above sub-policy. Cc: Amy Ford, Senior Planner File 8 • � c - Albert J. Krupski, President ��. QG Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� 'yam 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster y =� P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda � Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A.Dickerson 'jijJ� aQ� Telephone(631) 765-1892 1 ! [ �► Fax(631)765-+398'( b% BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _Coastal Erosion Permit Application _Wetland Pernut Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension _Received Application: _Received Fee:$ _Completed Application ; _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted —Coordination:(date sent) MAR 1 5 2006 _CAC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: _Public Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant)R 0,5 U 0 Tfi 775-a/r W )9 Address /� y 1- ✓-��- 19 Z Phone Number:( ) J o�. 1 Y y- V 7// Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - O -—Z Property Location: s- I? D J_ /`'}dE G (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: E %1 l� (If applicable) v Address: Phone: - ZZ ,�_ 130 Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): /�l b Area Zoning: Previous use of property. ® J4,E G,7 �J Intended use of property. AS j /,� �yjQ E,� ��= /�G j �l 7— (SJ 0 Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? V"*�No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): 56 46- A 7-1-6 efdP `i ` 41-ID V .J Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: D E lf4 Z o P m f tl% o F �j%W_ 13M1L.A>ryGs �� BE 3),eAvo411Syxj �-t 4fe or is_114 ies 16/yC 8 7 0 GI" EV j'L o P 7 /y I�LlS 1 0'l�L u I L7�17`�L To R g �rPL/��t-',f� cv1 T H TA r9-�HS46/I T h� TEL - R661-'i9y p, 4//T.,EX 16TlNC B C �9' T 12 fiF/l/ 7-6 VE t/S/T —9 �J , 1'Hi/�LZ-/ 124��F0 p_C.<7T 7 %v )3L- 141-1 ��-� n �� z �� 617-E Area of wetlands on lot: 0 square feet (//9<�R E) Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland _ edge of wetlands: , feet Pi-4)y F® Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: G a feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No es /-G � 1 `9l-1[� SC'!� P� ��?�'}'✓EnT � f',E1��9� 6F FOX f61-1rJVnTEe )19LCoy,5FC4 S-HEI.c.S4 If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How:much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 0—/o o Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): ,S F 7-722C lf�1) ;' 1i �- � l��v /"/,S`s f )F61�/moi Po L/L-,' �, T?`fI� ff 7 GAIA project 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Stone Revetment(DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Construction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area(67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin(2,500 c.y.) 8. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal construction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. Pao(,TL-ur Dk-5r—i,(19T1r-ooV. Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York PAT Pjelq C. l.00 BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS T112 APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/I ER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / � DAY OF rV7 4tz c1 ,20 0 6 ota Public MARGARET C. RUTKOWSIG Notary Public,State of New York No. 4982528 oualified in Suffolk County ,7 Commission Expires June 3, 631 765 4643; J 8 02 i0:04; ,'4c3c r AUTHORIZATION LETTER I New YOrk State Departmenc - of Environmental Conservation 3uiiding 40-SUNY Stony Srook, New York 11790-2356 Att : Regulatory Permits OWNER: OKI-DO LTD. name: Dr. Kauuko Tatsuraura Millyer Ph.D, President. address: 1 Lincoln Plaza, Apt . 24E; New York, NY 10023 telephone number;212-"799-9711 PROPERTY: 2335 Shipyard Laae, east Marion SCTM##: 1000-38-07-7 , 1 AGENT: name: Patricia C. Moore Esq. address: 51020 Main Roa Smitrol-? NY 11971 teiephone number: 631-765-4330 Dear Sir or Madam; I Dr. Kazuk.o Tatsumura iii 1 lyer Ph.D auth()r1 ze my attorney, Patricia C. Moore as my agent for all submissions to the DEC, Southold Town; Trustees, and ars other agency Y g� y l: crir�g jurisdiction reaardir; the property. Very truly yours DrKa ko TaYsumura Hillyer Ph.D d APPLICANUAGENU/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: p' ?/L 1,4 c-° tveib j3 s. ,r Hr F61 (Last name,fust name-,.gii dle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) � PAI NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) ��✓L L y r- Tax grievance Building Variance Le� Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest`Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO i/ If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this of n 6 Signature Print Name_1?6 TAIIA 01G'` O �S(� Form TS l Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCE'ASSESSMENT FORM A. IlVSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies,shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency.*Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C,the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program.A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered"yes",then the proposod action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.Thus,the action should be analyzed in more detail and,if necessary,modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions.If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-35-07-7.1 MAR 1 5 2006 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esci. 51020 Main Load, Southold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ Zoning Board of Appeals 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ❑ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ® Type: Special permit/exception Town of Southold LWRP 1 Consistency Assessment Form Nature and extent of action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s) and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant, manager's residence,various accessory structures (swimming pool, meeting rooms, gazebos,maintenance building, etc.),refurbished boat basin/sUps, creation of lake/water feature, landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading, dredging, removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures, construction of new shoreline protection structures, construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. Location of action: eastside of Shipyard Lane, north of Gardiners Bay near Cleaves Point,East Marion. Site acreage: 18.7115 acres Present land use: Abandoned/deteriorated industrial buildings, overgrown fields/second growth woods, dredged boat basin. Present zoning classification: Marine II 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a)Name of applicant: Oki-Do Ltd. c/o Patricia C. Moore Esq. (b)Mailing address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 119711 (c) Telephone number: �) 765-4330 (d)Application number, if any: NA Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No ® If yes, which state or federal agency: Town of Southold LWRP 2 Consistency Assessment Form • J DEVELOPED COA,S T POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The proposed project will remove abandoned, dereiorated buildings that are a significant impact on the community character. They will be replaced with an attractive,unique structure and use. The existing deteriorated shoreline structures will be repaired and or replaced to provide the needed interstructure for the marine dependant uses of the facility. The proposed use is consistant with the zoning of the site,with a special permit. The project will promote the goal of tourism to the Town of Southold and provide an end destination for persons who might not other wise visit the Town,thus providing economic benefits to the surrounding communities and commerical centers. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion(if appropriate): The site is not identified as area of archeological sensitivity or on the National Register on the map produced by NYS Dept. Of State,Division of Coastal Resources. The site has been previously been significantly disturbed. The existing buildings on site are not historic and are in a state of deterioration. The inventory prepared by SPLIA for the Town does not list the site or structures. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout 'the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The existing deteriorated industial building have a significant detrimental visual impact on the area. The existing shoreline protection devices are also deteriorated and large amounts of debris exists along the shoreline and site. The proposed proiect will remove the existing buildings and debris and old structures along the shoreline. A new building(s) of unique and attractive design will be constructed. The shoreline will be revitalized with new protection structures, of the same design as those to the community to the west. Native planting material will be installed adjacent to the main building on the western portion of the site. The eastern portion of the site, adiacent to the water,will remain in its natural state and provide a buffer to the water. The detached units will be Town of Southold LWRP 3 Consistency Assessment Form P situated around a lake/water feature and significanly landscaped to provide and attractive setting. While the proposed project will alter the existing visual setting, the change is considered an improvement over the existing visual blight that exists on the site. Town of Southold LWRP 4 Consistency Assessment Form I NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The proposed structure(s)will be constructed to meet the flood elevation for the site. The existing deteriorated shoreline protection will be removed and replaced with rip-rap that will provide protection from erosion as well as provide habitat within the stones, matching the existing protection structures to the west. Native planting will be installed above the rip-rap to provide additional protection. The natural area on the east side of the existing boat basin will remain in its natural state. The dune vegetation in this area will provide protection to the other aspects of the project. Additional native plantings will be installed as required to colonize areas of bare earth. The deteriorated boat basin will be repaired and restored to provide a functional facility. Policy S. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): A state of the art sewage treatment facilty will be installed as part of the project. All necessary permits will be obtained from the SCDHS for sewage disposal. The existing deteriorated sanitary system will be removed The site was inspected for the possibility of toxic and hazardous materials All potential sources were removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with regulations The existing structures, paved areas, etc. has direct discharges for runoff into the surface waters. Under the proposed project these will be removed and on site recharge will be provided. Native and low-fertilizer dependant plant species will be used in the design and landscaping to reduce nitrogen loading from the site. I I Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III- Policies;Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No,❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay and contains a dredged boat basin. The existing boat basin has shoaled closed which has resulted in stagnate conditions. The proposed restoration of the boat basin will allow for tidal action within it that will improve water quality. The existing tidal wetlands on site will bo be disturbed. The significant amount of debris with the wetlands and shoreline areas will be removed. The proposed use of rip-rap will provide increase Town of Southold LWRP 5 Consistency Assessment Form habitat value over the previous bulkheading along the shore line. An existing osprey nest will remain and a natural buffer of undisturbed vegetation will remain around it The proiect will create a lake/water feature that is not currently on the site No freshwater wetlands are in the area of the site, and the creation of the lake/water feature will provide additional habitat not presently avalible. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III-Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion(if appropriate): Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): This project is being designed as a "Green Project" unders the LEED program, as such, a key componant will address the handling of solid waste and recycling The removal of the existing structures on with will be a part of this program that will include but not limited to recyling scrap metal and crushing of concrete to use in construction for the facility. As noted previously, a Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment was carried out on the site to determine if and hazardous waste was on the site. Suspect sources were investigated and properly addressed. Town of Southold LWRP 6 Consistency Assessment Form PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters,public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The proposed action will provide a facility available to the public. The existing boat basin that was previous a private industrial facility, and silted in, will be restored to provide for a boat basin will dock space for transient boats. Existing debris along the shoreline will be removed. The public access at the end of Shipyard Lane will be preserved and visual impacts caused by the existing deteriorated industrial structures will be removed. Town of Southold LWRP 7 Consistency Assessment Form A i r WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The deteriorated, private industrial boat basin will be restored to provide a facility for transient boaters. The proposed transient hotel complex will provide the public with a facility adjacent to the water that is consistent with the policy standards as listed in Table 1 of the LWRP. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable❑ Discussion(if appropriate): The restoration of the tidal action in the boat basin will improve water quality in it. This will promote and enhance the marine resources found on the site. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No ❑ Not Applicable❑ Discussion(if appropriate): As stated previously, the project is being designed as a "Green Proiect" under the LEED program. The project is being designed to use various sources of alternate energy as part of its operation, as well as many energy saving devices and techiques. *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWRP 8 Consistency Assessment Form t. 6 17.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: i✓ Part 1 ®✓ Part 2 F]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ©A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. FIB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* FIC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. MAR 1 5 2006 *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Gaia Holistic Circle Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) e/s Shipyard Lane,East Marion,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd.c/o Patricia Moore,Esq. Address 51020 Main Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone 1-631-765-4330 Name of Owner(if different) Oki-Do Ltd. Address One Lincoln Plaza,Apt 24E City/PO New York State NY Zip Code 10023 r Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 Description of Action- Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant,manager's residence,various accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance building,etc.), refurbished boat basin/slips,creation of lake/water feature,landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading,dredging,removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures,construction of new shoreline protection structures,construction of sewage treatment facility on a 18.7115 acre site. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:©Urban ✓®Industrial ©Commercial ©Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm) ©Forest ©Agriculture ®Other Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: �✓®Well drained 100%of site ®Moderately well drained %of site. ®Poorly drained %of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of sod are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? © Yes 0 No a. What is'depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5 Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ✓©0-10% 100% ®10- 15% % 015%or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a budding, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ®i No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ®Yes MNo 8 What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feet) 9 Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ®° Yes © No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ©Yes M No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? F]Yes No Accordin to: Cramer Consulting Group Identify each species: Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? QYes R No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species"in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural'. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ©Yes R No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes F!]No The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area- NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres). The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? R Yes ®No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? EYes ©No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ©Yes RE No 18. Is the site located inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ©Yes M No 19. Is the site located in or substantiallLontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes ro I No 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes 51No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately 1 114rooms 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 190' width, 200' length j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed EYes ©No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®■ Yes © No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Fm�Yes © No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ®Yes Fm'] No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? FM] Yes © No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ©Yes M No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 200'; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?©Yes 0 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes F±]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes ®No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes 0 No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx.0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F__]Yes ©No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? M Yes ©No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 0 Yes ®No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchogue,Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? EYes Q No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect.)during demolition. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes RE No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes R No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ©Yes Fm�No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ©Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Fn�Yes ® No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ®Yes F No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes FwD No Site Plan City, Town, Village Planning Board �Yes No Special Permits for City, Town Zoning Board Fm�Yes © No Trans.Motel&Restaurant SCDHS Site Plan City, County Health Department M Yes © No Other Local Agencies F Yes No Trustee's Wetlands Other Regional Agencies ©Yes Fm-] No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands State Agencies M Yes ® No US Army Corp Federal Agencies Fl Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes © No If Yes, indicate decision required: © Zoning amendment Q Zoning variance © New/revision of master plan © Subdivision F] Site plan ®' Special use permit ©Resource management plan © Other Page 8 of 21 f 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Marine II(MII)District 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 18.7115 acre boatyard/marina for building,storing,repairing,renting,selling or servicing boats,which may include the following as an accessory use:office for the sale of marine equipment or products,dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel,and similar uses. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action? Multi-family and single-family residential,agricultural,abandoned industrial land uses. Zoning is R-40(1-acre single-family), RR(Resort Residential-Multi-family),MII(Marine District-site). 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? F Yes ©No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? NA Page 9 o'121 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? FElYes F� No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? R Yes ®No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ®Yes n No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ©Yes ®No Slight increase in local traffic as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated,with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Patrica Moore,Esq.for Oki-Do Date Signature Title Attorney for Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) ! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question ! In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a,potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ® © © Yes ©No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table ® ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ® © © Yes ©No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or © ❑ Yes Q No involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ® ® ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or sod)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. El © ®Yes ©No • Construction in a designated floodway. El © ©Yes ©No • Other impacts: ©Yes EJNo 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) ONO ©YES • Specific land forms: © © ©Yes ©No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under:Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) -1 NO r-1 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. © ©Yes 0 No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of El ® ©Yes El No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ® © ©Yes ©No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. F-1 © ©Yes 0 No • Other impacts: © 0 Yes 0 No Reconstruction of existing bulkhead and dredging in tidal wetlands. Removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures&construction of new rip-rap shoreline stabilization structures. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? M. ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of © © ©Yes ©No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface © ©Yes ©No area • Other impacts: ®• ©Yes El No Project calls for the creation of a naturalized lake/water feature on site. Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? FE NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ® ©Yes ©No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ® ® ©Yes ©No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ® © ©Yes ©No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ® ® ©Yes ®No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ® © ®Yes ®No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ® ® FlYes ©No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons © ® F]Yes ©No perday. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ® ®Yes F�No an,,existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or © ® ©Yes ©No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ® ®Yes ©No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses © ® ©Yes ©No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ® © ©Yes ®No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? ©NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows 17 ®Yes ©No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ® ® ©Yes ©No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ® © ®Yes ©No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ® © ©Yes ©No floodway. • Other impacts: El ® QYes Q No Stormwater runoff will be contained/recharged on site w/subsurface structures and landscaped lake/water feature. Eliminate existing direct stormwater runoff from aband.buildings&paving. IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will Proposed Action affect air quality? R NO RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any EJ © ®Yes ©No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton © © ®Yes ©No of:refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour ® ® ©Yes ©No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ® 0 ©Yes ©No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ® ® ©Yes ©No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: © © ®Yes ©No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ®NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ® ® ®Yes ©No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ® ® ©Yes ©No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ® ® ©Yes ©No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 0 ®Yes E' No Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? RNO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ® ® ©Yes ©No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ® ® ©Yes ©No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ® ® ®Yes ®No 'IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? .®'NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ® ® ©Yes ©No agricultural land(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ® ® ©Yes ©No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 © ©Yes ©No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 r-" 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of © ® ©Yes ©No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ® © ®Yes ©No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary,use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ®NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different © ©Yes F'm]No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ® © ®Yes ®No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or © © ©Yes ©No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: © ❑' ©Yes [i]No The site currently contains abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s)&accessory uses that will be removed,which is considered to be a significant benifical impact. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? M NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or © ® 0 Yes © No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within © © ©Yes ©No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive © ❑ ❑ Yes [] No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 ' 1 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ® ® ©Yes ©No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? FE 1 NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ® ® ©Yes ©No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ® ® ©Yes ©No • Other impacts: ® ©Yes ©No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(8)? g MNO ®YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? M M nYes MNo • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ® ® ©Yes ©No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ® © ©Yes ©No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ® © ©Yes ©No resource? • Other impacts: El © ®Yes ®No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ©. NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or © Q ®Yes ©No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ® ® ®Yes ©No • Other impacts: ® © ®Yes ©No Slight increase in local traffic,impact will not be significant as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). IMPACTON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? RNO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the © ® ®Yes F No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ® 0 ®Yes ©No energy transmission or supply system to`serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: © El ®Yes D No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors,noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ®. NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive © © ®Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ® ® ®Yes ©No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the © © ©Yes ®No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a © © ©Yes Q No noise screen. • Other impacts: © © ©Yes 0 No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? 0 NO ©YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of 17 ® ®Yes ®No hazardous substances(i.e.oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" © © ©Yes ©No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous, highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ® ® ®Yes ©No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ® ® ©Yes ©No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: © © ©Yes ©No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ®NO MYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ® 0 ©Yes ©No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ® ® ®Yes ©No services will increase by more than 5%u per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ® ® ®Yes ©No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ® ®Yes ©No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ® © ®Yes ©No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ® ® ®Yes FINo services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ® © ©Yes ©No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. © F-1 El Yes ©No • Other impacts: ® ® ©Yes ©No Removal of abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s).Generation of approx 200 jobs during constr.& 100 after completion. Both considered significant benifical impacts. 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ®. NO ©YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 � r i ! y Part 3 -EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions(If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 s ' __ 1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary March 14, 2006 Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 MAR 15 2006 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold,NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle/OKI-do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President and Board: Enclosed is the wetland permit application for the above referenced project. This plan has been submitted to the ZBA,Planning Board and Health Department. The DEC application will be submitted shortly, we had a pre-submission conference with the DEC in order to obtain their comments. We have incorporated their initial recommendations into this plan. Enclosed is my office check in the amount of$250.00. . Due to the complexity of this project we recommend that we schedule a separate site inspection with the architects and myself to carefully review the project description while on site. We will make ourselves available at your convenience. Very trul ours, atricia C. Moore f cc: Werthner