The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEmery, Ellen F 1999 Revocable Trust 304 •A9 Lot 40 8°36�20 � � � � N7 u s O p5 0 �4 — —0 fegrade away from foundation to french drain.Provide weep u — rn C) holes in timher wall from drain 1L_ 71- � .�V � 03 v O Fedirect Gut flow to —� O south min 6' butter °� O Alternate Gutter Flav,r an leader CP P.oute to Pgwoll JuteLO , u o e W _� � L KP C) 1 o j1i1 Lawn Lot 4 p z zo — p � C E —� O p5 �C O�ar,?0 O A„ r`o� A 8 ft Via,17rainage rings A 30 3 .�J 1 e-- Minimum 3 sections plus f W O I chimney with grate p Asphalt Driveway Q 57 603(SIZ011W LEGEND O O b 2 % Slope rea6ravel 2 % 51ope Runoff Direction �"re forated 4" PVC Perforated Drain Pipe 12" Mui Lot 42 brain Pipe Filter Fabric —�—moi— 4" PVC Drain Pipe D5 Downspout 30 0 30 GO Drainage Swale 5ectlon DW Drywell 1L. IL Graphic Scale Notes: All work done in accordance with all applicable state and local codes. Drawings based on Surveys provided by John C. Ehlers dated 05-14-201 3 and site visits July 20, August 2G and October 30,20 13. Sprinklers may be installed G" below cJrade Gutter can drain into french drain if drain size is increased to G". Q�aF S�S IQNq�� o ssu _ o ti� -= acoast Construction Dan S e l i m a n n P ESei; i f� SCALE DRAWING No. • �:�_� Q� Sa Vl � le NY Ellen Emery Residence Drainage Plan LIC : 077043 077043 ,3 \/ AS SHOWN T 077 yJ �` ' 5925 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 MADE BY DS DATE 1 1 -27- 13 D _ I /2 -M2 - 13 CH'KD BY DATE 304.A9 1 Lot 40 C °3G4,r 0"E O 1478 co QQ :so r, 'bsN � N P•arsk aral fr°n fnnittn `t U � � u h = � � m � �� O (` w rr—h darn Pmnd.:nM 3 Idnntabaadlfian dao a a. a• ti 3 a 7 r o _ 6 0 fv118 Mom v / Yuth m„6'Wta °f O 1r\ rVtsrut r,r...nr. s L.ji Kn,k DMreg o u ° Iota Mattm9(typ) —----- on -1on 51ope D q U v< 3 SC3 ) 11 Lot 4 I O G ? E � Q - D5OTa,nP`pe ra, P,P° O �a T, Pe°ramw a%\ A' ` ��„n,n9 3p3.6 3 � e Drar..,:ray, ` Asphalt Driveway 5.7 °36`20„W LEGEND 0 0 2'R� a Runoff Dvecban IT'M. 4- � 4'PVC Perforated Drain Pipc Patmt.d I'Attr Fabnc Lot 42 DranPR 4'FVC Dram Pipe D5 Downspout 30 O 30 GO Dralnacle Swale 5ectlon DW Dry,vell Graphic 5cale _ n Notes: ESSIO, ; ? All work domain a—dance wrath all apphmbl.state and local—d.s �""Q SEL jCtC�/ Drawings based on 5urvey5 provided by John C.Ehlers vi ��q/ 1 " dated05-14-2013 and site sits July 20.August 2G and Jy1 - October 30,2013. 5pnnklers may be mstalled G'below grade JAN1 7 2014 Gutter can drain into french drain if drain sac is increased to G'. � T • A 0 Is ��Q ar f Tru s S OF N Dan Sellgmann PE Seacoast Construction LIC: 077043 Sayville, NY Ellen Emery Residence Dralnage Plan AS SHOWN DRAWING 5925 Nossau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 DF— MADE _ F3Y QS DATE 11-27-13 CH'KD BY DATE N ote5: All work done in accordance with all applicable state and local codes. Drawings based on Surveys provided by John C. Ehlers dated 05-14-20 1 3 and site visits July 20, August 2G and October 30,20 13. Materials: _ Timber piles - ASTM Class B 2.5 CCA Treatment Structural Timber - SYP Marine Grade 2.5 CCA Treatment Bolts, rods etc. ASTM 307 Hardware - All hardware hot dipped galvanized Railings - SYF Min No. I Grade Vinyl Sheeting - 5horecluard 425 and G50 by CMI 3 = Decking and Stair treads -Timbertech Composite Decking u 3 � g In z 3 E 3 ILI Slope covered In Jute Matting to be planted m '��` wdh mdigmous ground cover JAN 1 7 2014 n _ m 8 pelocate existing fl pole B in front of new deck for access 8 SJGL{lulu if:rtrf i eBoard of jWstees u l� c U Cy PRP Gnt J n'PI g u_ u o� C �.p Landing ,X o O To 75 sq ft 95 50.K Undmg m, ¢S rPr cnas 4 R(TYP) 5talrs shown schematically for Glanty v s 'o n m S�pcslo:I�j ,rte r,t !Q/3-1 s C.11 .�• `6` //JJPP•. io o to zo Partial Plan Graphic Scale EncJlneer: Contractor: Rev 1 . 01-08-14 Dan Seligmann PE Seacoast Construction Ellen Emery Residence SCALE DRAWING 140. LIC: 077043 Sayville, NY 5925 Nassau Paint Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 A5 Built Retaining Walls ASSHOWNE Ely GATE 12-12-13 101 GH'NO BY DATE -O - 1 x5 Composite decking UYP) 3 1'-2" by Timbertech 2x 12 Joists I G" OC 3x 12 5tair runner (4/stair) 0 1/2" Dock Bolts,Nuts 8" Rise, I I" Run Washers (TYP) Toe Board F� 2x8 Rad Cap 28'-0" 2xG Rads 8"Timber Pile (TYF) m X 2xG Timber Cleat FW) 5 2'-1 O" Q Dimen51on5 are ap roximate 5ee survey for exfct dimensions 4' Stair Treads Typical Stair S ect i o n and D eta F I s FRP Grating FRP Grating Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" Profile 5r-ala: 1/5'= I'-O" 13'-0" FRP Grating 2, 12" Class B Timber Pile Min 20' 12"Class B Timber Pile 25 ft Ion 20 ft lon 9 gExisting Picket Fence G"x8"Timber Waler (TYP) 5horeguard 425 Vinyl 10" Class B Timber Pile 51-ieeting I G' long 3' 3/4" Galv. Dock Bolt, Nut Washer 20 ft long I O" Class B Timber G"x8"Timber Waler OYP) 4' Pile deadmar 2, G„ I" Galv.Tle Rod, nuts * washers G"x8"Timber Water(lYP) Shore pard G50 Vinyl 5heetin 3/4 Galv. Dock Bolt 9 Y 9 Nut Washer(fyp) I G' Long _ 3/4" Galv. Dock Bolt • Nut Washer (Typ) I" Ga Iv. Rod Helical Anchor 6-10" 3"x 10"T*G 5heetmg 14' long 10"Class B Timber 3 I Batter Pile I G ft long - l - �ESSIQrV , '.;� '� � SELF, ,< � � t JAN 1 7 2014 L Section A-A s Section B-B � - o„o4g o�- s�u�r:�;�iOm„ e ct i o n C-C y ar f Tru s __O Scale: 1 /4"= P-O" OF �`- Scale: I/4"= I '-O" Scale: 1/4"= I '-O" Engineer: Contractor: - Rev 1 . O 1-08-14 c3mann PE Seacoast Construction Ellen Emery Residence �A� DRAWING ND. Dan 5eh 5925 Nassau Point ucogue, NY 11935 AS Built Retalntng Wall Details AS SHOWN LIC: 077043 Sayville, NY Pit RCth "ADE BY ps DATE 12-12-13 102 ��NA, CH'KD BY DATE 5'-2„ 2x8 Rall Cap 2xG Rads (Typ) I x5 Compo5lte decking (TYF) 4 x4 Post(Typ) by Tlmbertech 2x 12 Joists I G"OC 3x 12 Stair runner(4/5tair) 8" Rise, I I" Run k A 30' - 1/2" Dock 5olt5,Nut5 Washers (TYP) GNG" Posts (fYF) Exi5tmg Sheeting wall A , Concrete Footing (TYP) 101-3 4 Section , A-A Scale: I/8ii= I i-O" 7'-13-4" 8'-8" Deck Plan Deck framino Scale: 1/8"= I i-O" Scale: 1/8"= l i-O" N otes JAN 1 72014 All work done 1n accordance with all applicable state and local codes. a Trustees Materials: Structural Timber - SYP Pressure Treated B01t5, rods etc. ASTM 307 Hardware - All hardware hot dipped galvanized Railings - SYP Min No. I Grade Decking and Stair treads - Timbertech Com1205lte Decking Ellen Emery Residence SME BBUBBG NO. 5925 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Proposed Deck Details A55HOWN wOE Bf D5e ah 1-8-14 D- I WO BY DATE I 5U RVEY OF LOT ,47 "MAP OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION A, NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES INC., N SITUATED ON NASSAU POINT, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. SAID LOT ALSO SHOWN I ON "AMENDED MAPA, NASSAU POINT", FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUFFOLK COUNTY ON 8-1 G-22 AS MAP NO. 15G e SITUATE: CUTCHOGUE 0 E TOWN: 50UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY S SURVEYED 05-14-2013 REVISED 10-23-2013, 11-20-2013 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX# 1000- 1 1 1 - 13 - G CERTIFIED TO: I �O1 A0 , ELLEN EMERY 10('� PROPERTY ADDRESS30A•491 I 0 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD FEN0ti0.55 I N CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 Q M 70 Q W l� G�EP o - 28 0 o a 7 8°3 6 2rn � LIL 130A rn ` _ -13 V 70 A �a ➢ 0 rn D t0 Ep,icK 3i = C� O� �5TOOP O � O y �� 0 LIL 13oX Cr) 0 l , 0 1 — 1 J 4.b- g IpNDINGS (S MM 111 's LAWN PRAMS 5'6 FRAME STAIRS o r STOOP _ C � 1 c 0 � — 22.a S ' c9 , p 0 LS�,z '303 63 "" A5Pt1ALT DRIVEWAY -W ^'^' 713 (D �w );10� �j°36 2O� JAN 1 7 2014 4 5� \o q 2 Board f Trustees NOTES: BURIED RETAING WALL LOCATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR NOTES: ®� �� "Unauthorized beaanzed altlicensed or addition to a survey map bearing a licensed land surveyor's seal is a violotion of section 7209 sub–di—,on 2,of the MONUMENT FOUND JOHN C E H LE R5 LAND SURVEYOR �� C EHE (��® New York State Education Law" O O WOOD FENCE C . ��°'O�� 'rp "Only copies from the ongmol of this survi V- marked with an original ri i of of the land surveyors PA stamped seal shall be considered to be valid true Area = 30,379 Sq. Ft. y signify copies Area = 0.6974 Acres G EAST MAIN STREET q sting Code prepared odor Land nSurveyce that ex's N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 sting Code of Practice for Land Surveys adopted l by the New York State Association of Professional GRAPHIC SCALE I fl— 30l 0 Land Surveyors Said certifications shall run only RIVERHEAD N.Y. I 1901 369-8288 Fax 3G9-8287 'o �' o�the person far wham the sarvey is prepared, L� r� and his behalf to the title company,governmen– t` 4 tot agency and lending institution listed hereon,and Iong15landland5urveyor.com tiSFO LAIo °thonssare not transferable additional s t`�to�s Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Richter,Jamie F-4R0.A JPv� Sent: Friday,January 30, 2015 3:37 PM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: FW: Emery Attachments: As Built Plan 1 15.pdf, Pictures 1 15.pdf FYI James A. Richter Office of the Engineer Town of Southold,New York Stormwater Management Control Plan Website: http://www.southoldtoM20.gov/index.aspx?nid=l 95 Office: 631-765-1560 Cell: 631-926-9430 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE': This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 3:44 PM To: Verity, Mike Subject: Emery Michael Enclosed please fine an as built plan and photographs of the drainage for the Emery Project. This drainage installation has been approved by my office. Erosion &sediment controls should remain in place until all vegetation has fully regrown. Please let me know if you need any additional information related to this project. Jamie James A. Richter Office of the Engineer Town of Southold, New York Stormwater Management Control Plan Website: http://w-ww,.sotitholdtowiin_v.gov/index.aspx?nid=195 Office: 631-765-1560 Cell: 631-926-9430 i t I CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s) Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. z 60 axay I _`_..--- I to frers"r clan •.d:v,�ap— 'F�-',.r �� I \ I \ holes in timber Al`rcm d-ain M —f `- d2 Sectad P iia�p; ''a ar,� o,•rre ( `' \Existing Asphalt Driveway #a\ \ \ \ Sly \\ \ \ N c a'Zp 1Z \ \\ \ Lawn `` Lot 4 \5F \ , \ \ > \ \ S CO \ _ Prop.iroreh Aran V5,-\'--'_'"" _ 3 i�'m-vs '"a. 5" \ < i .� Pool I Cx Ylia.7 l;[a•ctc w W p1ti v\ � t/I a \ 1 1 m `\ 1 .z ,,��,,,rlir.I%ra6plµ; d�s •-.,_..."•`"""•----.._fir' \\ \ 1 J.-, � e�lt%Cjf N� ea�c 1 ��-.-!p I \ \ Prol 3 se•?kris {� �r=^'"'" ,m\.,�-� \ , r____ .,-,�::✓'-`rte .F_xisi.mg Asphalt Drivev Ry \ i, �._J. \-\ — }.�"_".^. 1 __�--..�\ ..�.-;;.- 5.� ---,�� !'�"�T•-i._•-" __-I:,•i;%v:w't{Sit Ferce OWf '�"'1-F 12rfd i�J,hT ,,, ie,�y\sa'45�k�trn•/-_�� 1 Sig Lot 42 DS 30 0 30 GO W Graphic 5cAe � a � �•�'� �� III i t��Fks{�� I,1 "a� Y �, n p h I v Y \ / V tea.: „I ipl�l f y Pm s e u too w .. WOW- **Opp 10 MW TIC A F' %�- P„ ,+ N r Qom' �" �F`ry• a �� .r¢y. t'� � � .� � 41 +N , Aw y� .a � _ =a"' - -. .,��✓� � "✓' � �. ice' , a a. c > • s 6 µ , ,,. ' t e r w xx Li 4- , e ; t +dh YsY� z 3 , .r m• � " ' f s gw 17. lip 44 a �- � � sw now "too A _. Y - x � �•�mr+,a'Mklt; a dam" sY "�-V '•a + l �i��a - pIlk Wx # A OAKe *6 b: f� nT 7 s� : �'�• 7 uy, y;;,.- x; �,; lu;��ll�i iii�i 2,� ,e. �r*,i��, lift "3. y 8� howa a y o x , �, x,•.��• amu- n � r i r 1 e 4r. r i „ kr�x § � I f 4 `1f a�4 �y 1 r 3! j� 1 ': rd Vin, s ' V SFS � "`�<• �~ , , ° Alw- PW ol r < f' x SCOTT A. RUSSELL JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR F i „==Y4?= MICHAEL M. COLLINS, P.E. TOWN HALL- 53095 MAIN ROADR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631)-765-1560 ;> '"` " Fax. (631)-765-9015 MICHAEL COLLINS a•TOWN SOUTHOLD NY US , " JAMIE RICHTER u•TOWN SOUTHOLD NY US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 16, 2014 John Bredemeyer- President Southold Town Board of Trustees --- 53095 Main Road E C Southold, New York 11971 - Re: Stormwater Review for Ellen Emery [MAY 19 2014 SCTM #: 111 - 13 - 6 _ Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: - Enclosed please find the stormwater review as requested by the Board of Trustees. This project is an as-built situation regarding the work done to protect the face of bluff on Nassau Point without permits. As I understand the Board's concern, the Trustees were troubled that stormwater generated by the existing residence would saturate the surrounding soils and de-stabilize the bluff face. The Board of Trustees also wanted stormwater to be contained and/or directed away from,the bluff face. The drainage, as proposed by this site plan, appears to satisfy the - issues or concerns that you have raised. Please keep in mind that this new drainage requires a final installation inspection by my office or as certified by a design professional. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. In erely, ames A. Richter, R.A. APPLICANT S.C.T.M.#: 1000 OSu� 236 (Pro(PropertyOwnex,,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) ® � O' 11 3 6 �G Stormwater Management on rol Pian CHECKLIST Emery Section Block Lot NAME Ellen EmeW � S M C P -Plan Requirements- Provide ONE copy of the Building Permit Appllhcation. Please P," (631) 734—Date: d * The applicant must provide a Complete Explanation and/or Reason for not providing 6807 5-10-14 0! all Information that has been Required by the following Checklist! $igna�ure Telephone Number 1. A Site Plan drawn to scale Not Less that 60'to the inch MUSTIf You answered No or NA to any Item, Please Provide Justification Herel show all of the following items: YES IVO NA If you need additional room for explanations, Please Provide additional Paper. a. Location& Description of Property Boundaries �00 b. Total Site Acreage. X00 c. Existing-Natural & Man Made Features within 500 L.F. of the Site Boundary as required by§236-17(C)(2). d. Test Hole Data Indicating Soil Characteristics&Depth to GroundlWater. Will provide during excavation for drainage structures. Certified after installation. e. LimiiNs of Clearing& Area of Proposed Land Disturbance. FX f. Existing& Proposed Contours of the Site (Minimum2'intervals) IF X1=11 g. Location of all existing& proposed structures, roads, DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED driveways, sidewalks, drainage improvements& utilities. Contact TOS Engineering at 765-1560 before h. Spot Grades & Finish Floor Elevations for all existing & 000Backfill OR Provide Engineees Certification proposed structures. that the drainage has been installed-to Ged"e. I. Location of proposed Swimming Pool and discharge ring. "=0 j. Location of proposed Soil Stockpile Area(s). Ell k. Location of proposed Construction Entrance/Staging Area(s). =F—X—]0 Existing Driveway EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROLS 1. Location of proposed concrete washout area(s). 00F_X1 shall include but not be limited to: M. Location of all proposed erosion&sediment control measures. EL00truction Entrance, 2. Stormwater Management Control Plan must include Calculations showing liMire Backed silt Fencing,stabilization& that the stormwater improvements are sized to capture,store,and infiltrate on-site the run-off from all impervious surfaces generated by a two(2")inch �00seeding of ex rainfall/storm event. 3. Details&-Sectional Drawings for stormwater practices are required for approval Items requiring details shall include but not be limited to: a. Erosion&Sediment iControls. X b. Construction Entrance&Site Access. Existing Driveway c. Inlet Drainage Structures (e.g catch basins,trench drains,etc.) 0�0 d. Leaching Structures (e. .infiltration basins,swales,etc) X ****FOR ENGINES G EPART ONLY**** Additional Information is Required. Reviewed & I Stormwater Management Control Plan is Not Complete. Approved By: - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -r — — — — — — — Stormwater Management Control Plan is Complete. Date: At.b LLJSMCP has been approved by the Engineering Department. FORM # S Check List-TOS MAY 2014 Scott A. Russell SKFOIRMWATIE]k SUPkRVISOR MANAGEMENT SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL-Pt Q.Box,I179 53095 Main Road-SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Town ®f Southold CHAPTER 236 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WORK SHEET ( TO BE COMPLETED-BYTHEAPPLICANT') DOES THIS' PR-OJ ECT INVOLVE ANY OF THE TOLLOWING. Yes No (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) E][D' A. Clearing, grubbing, grading or stripping of land which affects more than 5,000 square feet of ground,surface. F1 R. 'Excavation or filling, involving-more than,2Q0 ,cubic yards of material within any parcel or any contiguous area. C. Site preparation on slopes which exceed. 10 feet' vertical rise to 100,feet of horizontal distance,. D. Sitepreparation within 100 feet of wetlands; beach, bluff or coastal erosion hazard area., [10 E. Site preparation within the one-hundred-year floodplain-as depicted' on FIRM Map of any watercourse. F. Installation of new or .resurfaced impervious surfaces of 1,000 square, -feet or more, unless. prior approval of a Stormwater Management Control Plan was received by the Town and the.proposal includes in-kind replacement of impervious-surfaces. 'If,you answered NQ.to all of the questions above,,STOP!` Complete,the Applicant section below with your Name, Signature, Contact Information, Date & County Tax Map Number! Chapter i3 6 does not.apply to your project. If you answered YES to one or,more of the above, please submit Two,c6pies of a Stormwater Management Control Plan and a completed Check List,Form to the Building Department with y-o-ur Building Permit Application. M T C. . . APPLICANT: (Property Owner, Professional, Coniractor�-Other)_ 'S. 1000 Datd, - District NAME Ellen Emery ill 13 6 Section _B_10& 771Dt 1 � **4� Lark & Folts, Esqs. FOR BIJILDI EPARTMENT USE ONILY* contac!:Iffoirnatiorf (631) 34-6807 - Reviewed,By: _!!_41 Date: 5 Property Mdrebs i Location-of Construction Work: iApproved f6r.proc- sibq Builng Permit. 5925 Nassau Point Road Stormvwater Management Control Plan Not Required, Cutchogue, NY 11935M Stormwater Mana9 ement Control Plan i!§R6cjuired. III IL LW (Forward,to Engineering Department for Review.) 'FORM 4 SNlCP'-TOS MAY. 74 ' I , Board of Trustees 47 February 19, 2014 TRUSTEE O: All in favor? (ALL AYES). I would like to ma to approve this application as submi , noting that the measurements have not changed, and that ad nc as put forward by the LWRP coordinator. That's �. soet�cond. TRUSTEE SAN TRUSTE OMINO: All in favor? (Trustee ' , e. I rus ee rustee Sanders, aye. Trustee Bredemeyer, re MR. BRED : I ask for revote, also to give time for an read the 44 a es in fron you. TRUSTE a hearing is closed at this point. We' e a eak. (A recess is taken). TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER:We are back on the record. The next item number eleven, Lark & Folts, Esqs, on behalf of ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 100' timber pile vinyl sheet bulkhead; as-built 80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±25' landward of bulkhead; as-built 80' mid-bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±55' landward of bulkhead; as-built 85'timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with a 12' return and a 25' return located ±10' landward from top of bluff; as-built bluff stairs from top of bluff to beach consisting of a 4'x7' access platform leading to a 4'x28' set of stairs with associated 75 sq.ft. platform to a 4'x7' set of stairs with associated 95 sq.ft. platform to a 4'x17' set of stairs leading to a 4'x13' walkway with a 4'x10' set of stairs to beach parallel to bulkhead, supported by 8" timber pile posts and composite materials on stair treads and decking; as-built 1,800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material with placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff; for a proposed rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front yard area; and for a proposed 200 sq.ft. deck of composite decking supported by 6"x6" posts located 10' landward from top of bluff. Located: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. The Board is familiar with this job, having been out on it numerous times. It was the subject of two violations that have yet to be completely satisfied. The applicant has submitted additional plans reflecting what they have done. There is a pending indemnification agreement between the town and the applicant. There is a pending drainage review in the Office of the Town Engineer. There is a s Board of Trustees 48 February 19, 2014 question about, there remains a question among the Trustees concerning the drainage and possible impacts as far as soil eroding of the project. The CAC made no recommendations. The project was completed prior to inspection. The project has been determined to be inconsistent with the town's LWRP. I will go through the inconsistency now. The actions do not comply with Wetland Permits previously; does not conform with permitted structures, in other words the prior permits,the 95-square foot square landing was not included in the approvals; the wetland permit allows the installation of 10x10 observation platform at mid-bluff landing. It looks like a 75-square foot platform would comply with this condition. The as-built retaining walls do not conform to the permit specifications of permit number 8222; the as-built bulkhead does not conform to the permit specifications of 8049 which reflects the change over the prior permit activities of this Board. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak on behalf of this application? MR. LARK: Good evening, Richard Lark, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. I'm the attorney for the applicant. The applicant, Ellen Emery on behalf of the Trust, Ellen could not make it tonight. She is home sick with the flu. The engineer who I had hoped to have here, Mr. Seligmann, you have all his reports in your application, he's away. And Mr. Bredemeyer, you alluded to the storm water drain off. I have been in contact with Jamie Richter and he has given me what he wanted. I forward them on to the engineer, and they will be complied with. Unfortunately, to get them fully complied with, we need what they call a vertical survey, and when I got that translated for me, it was nothing more than a topographical survey, which we do not have of the property landward from the top of the bluff backwards toward the street. I contacted the surveyor, John Ehlers, who is also away, and he assures me he'll get it done as soon as the weather permits, due to the immense amount of snow on the property. He wants to do it not by satellite, but he wants to do it accurately, actually going out there in the field. And so that is pending and that will be done. As to the indemnification, I've discussed it both with the owner and with the contractor, who did make it through the mist of the fog tonight to be here, to do the explanations, if you have'any questions, and he's agreeable to it, too. There was just a couple of language changes in the description, which I have given to Ms. Hulse, and she was away, so I was only able to furnish them tonight, and those will be revolved probably within the next day or two. There is nothing to resolve. If she is agreeable, then they'll be signed and we'll be done with that feature. I have one other question I wanted to ask you before I ask Board of Trustees 49 February 19, 2014 for the permit, and it's a question to the Board. Due to the matting that we put on, that they put on the property, the jute matting -- TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I'm sorry, could you repeat that? MR. LARK: I have a question for the Board. The jute matting that we put on, I have not been able to obtain, soil and water has given me, department, in the county, has given me some recommendations, people to do. Because of the way the jute matting is, that will remain, that is a permanent situation, which I'm told could last as much as five or six years. But the plantings we hope to put in in the Spring, and what it is, it's a wire structure with the jute matting and they go down between, the squares are like four-inch squares, and they go down. So my question is, when I get that planting schedule, due to the length from the water up to the top of the bluff, to do the whole thing properly and get the correct plants and so on and so forth, does the Board want a copy of that planting, that plan, if you would, a landscape plan? Because I don't have that because I have been unable to do it. Because when we got the jute matting in and got everything done, the weather has not exactly cooperated. But I do have some names of some competent people that can give recommendations, and I just did not know if you wanted to have that also. That's just a question I had. Because I'm trying to get a complete wetlands application so we don't have to come back and have any problems. So that was my question. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Ordinarily, we would specify a planting plan for a project of this size. I would think that would be appropriate. MR. LARK: Okay, I intended to do that, it's just not able to be accomplished due to the — because when I have one guy go out, he says I can't tell you because one of the things they are waiting to happen also, and now with the severity of the weather and the frost penetration, we'll be able to determine what if any settling has been. Remember there is 1,800 cubic yards put on here, and it's all engineered sand and soil. So they are waiting for that. But so far everything has held up good. But then when the weather conditions turned sour in December we have not been able to do too much. But I will get that to you if you Board does request that for their approval. That was just a loose end I was not able to get finished, if you would, for lack of a better word. Okay, now, I brought the contractor is here and he will explain what has happened and why we were not able to completely adhere. We started to adhere. The bulkhead is proper and the first retaining wall is proper, but things started to go south on us during the construction. You have the pictures and I'll let him explain what happened. Because it was unknown to him until started the bulkheading as to why this property suffered such extreme damage in Sandy and the nor'easter that occurred a a Board of Trustees 50 February 19, 2014 week or so afterwards. Because the properties on either side, the one to the north, suffered no damage, and the Krupski property to the south suffered a little, which this contractor did repair on the bulkhead. But this property got decimated. And it was not until he was into the job probably two, three, maybe four, about three weeks when he realized that this thing was getting away from him. So I'll turn it over to him and he can do the explanation as to what happened. This is Christopher Gentry, from Sea Coast Construction. MR. GENTRY: Hi, my name is Chris Gentry from Sea Coast Construction, in reference to the Emery project. Initially I signed a contract, I think maybe 45 to 60 days after Hurricane Sandy. And I monitored it. We didn't get there, do you remember the start date? June, we got there, and by then there was so much scouring, and that's a term, the foot of the wall was so taken away, the property, to simply put it, this was the angle that it started out say the day after the storm. By the time we got there to do the construction, the repose was much steeper. So we got there and laid out the first initial wall, which we had permits for. When I say the first wall, we'll call that, the numbers meaning one offshore. So the number one wall we started. And as soon as I did any drilling, any pumping any excavating, the slope continued to fall down on me, on the property. I worked in the city. 1 worked in Miami. I work up and down the east coast of the United States. If this was any kind, know this is a residence job, so its a little different. If it was any other kind of job, they would have made us do all the retaining walls, lag everything in and stabilize it so it was not collapsing. The machine got covered on us twice, with men in it. So I was in dialogue with the engineer and the attorney and that is when I subsequently did the other walls, to stabilize the property. As we were working. We had to work our way up with the walls. They kept collapsing down. TRUSTEE SANDERS: How long did it take you to do those other two walls, in time? MR. GENTRY: I ganged it up. We put a double gang on it. We had set the shoulder piles, which are the face piles, within the first 48 hour shift. Then the framing, then the sheathing, probably five days. And we had each wall in place. Then we had to drill the horizontal, in essence, they are a big screw that goes into the earth called helicals. We drove them in and stabilized the property. TRUSTEE SANDERS: So there was time for you to contact the Trustees before the other two were built. It was five days, you said? MR. GENTRY: It was five days,of labor per wall, basically. On,the upland wall. And I had reached out to the attorney and reached out to the engineer, but to answer your question, yes, there probably was. And it was my mistake for not doing it. But I Board of Trustees 51 February 19,2014 have to tell you -- MR. LARK: Let me interrupt. The owner panicked. Because during July, when she was, it's a summer home, when she was in the house, the house started to shake. And when the engineer and the contractor got there, they found that there was fissures in the soil. Then they inspected the foundation and found out that it in fact had settled, and panic set in as to how much it was going to continue to settle. Because, and no lie, within one week, a good 20 feet of land from the top of the bluff,just fell. Just like calving of an iceberg. It just fell. That's when he talked about machines got buried and stuff like that. And the engineer said something has to be done right away. And that's when they designed the final wall ten foot landward. Which was not permitted. That's the thing.That's not permitted. The other walls were basically permitted. That was not. But panic set in to save the house.And the house did settle. And we have a permit now to buoy it up after all of is completed. MR. GENTRY: To underpin the structural dwelling, the existing dwelling,we have a permit from the town to put helicals under it. But as he jumped in, in essence, if you were looking at the house from the south, I'm not an artist, but if you look at this, and this was the side profile, one day the distance from the house to the edge of the bluff was 28 foot. A day later I come back and it was 26 foot.And I'm of the school of thought, my concern is, and maybe it was selfish on my business standpoint, but I didn't want to lose the house. And I knew it would have gone. I have seen structures fall completely over. This was a very compromised situation. And, you know, I kept looking at it and looking at it, and I knew what we had to do. We brought fill in during the construction. We had to put these walls in, you know, I even had to put temporary walls in and take them out just to stabilize the place. At one point we had a machine pinned down, plywooded in place to get the walls in place. TRUSTEE SANDERS: I totally understand your fear, but you do understand what it looks like to the Trustees, correct? MR. GENTRY: Yes, sir. TRUSTEE SANDERS: That work was done and then we were contacted. MR. LARK: No, I contacted the Trustees as soon as everything was stabilized and the engineer told me it was stabilized and we didn't have to do anything more. That's why the drainage was not put in or anything like that. We stopped, because he assured me that everything, that upper retaining wall had stabilized the house and he put stress crack tapes on the foundation and everything to monitor it. And I did contact them. And I guess it was in early, mid-September, and the Trustees did come out. TRUSTEE KING:We were not contacted until the work was all done, the stairs were all in place, beach stairs were all in place and the whole retaining wall. - —- --- ---- — —- ----- ' rI Board of Trustees 52 February 19,2014 MR. LARK: Oh, that part. He'll talk about the stairs. TRUSTEE DOMINO: By your own admission, the owner panicked in July but you didn't contact us until November. So that is a long time. I agree something should have been done, but honestly don't think this discussion is relevant at this point in the application. I have concerns about the drainage calculations and whether this will remain stable in the future. MR. GENTRY: The structures will remain stable. I have 30 years in this industry and I don't want to insult anybody from out here, but at present, tomorrow morning at 0800 I'll be on the Tappan Zee Bridge, I've worked on the Wantagh Bridge, I worked on the GW. I work for the biggest marine contractors in the world. I have an engineering background. The wall is not going anywhere. It's overbuilt completely. A lot of these structures on Long Island are under-built. I have seven years' worth of work rebuilding top name contractors in the New York areas.We have over eight-hundred structures before this storm and no failures. I understand soil and geo-tech and all that, and I have a licensed engineer that signed off and stamped everything we did. So as far as the stabilization— and I brought in the proper soils. The soils, there is a whole science to the soils, also. And this property took a direct hit. If you look at what I did, is, you know, I was thinking about it and I was trying to figure it out. I have a sixteen-hundred ton New York Coastal license with total endorsement. This took a direct hit, the properties here. This is the west side. This is the west side of Shelter Island. The water is 82 foot deep. The fetch here is 4.7 miles. This house could not have been in a worse place for this storm. Could not have been in a worse place. A direct line. TRUSTEE KING: Could have been in Jersey. MR. GENTRY: You're right. It could have been in Long Beach. But as far as the stabilization, the house is stable. 1 have calculations on all the helical piles, I have the proper toe penetration on all the pilings. Everything has been set. It's been overbuilt. As far as if you questioning any of that, you know, I have a long resume of work I have done. And we took photos and I can give you all the drawings on this, all the materials that was supplied, everything that was used here. And we didn't bring this,we brought the fill in with the telebelt machine from in front of the house, and we belted it over the roof of the house, all the fill. So we didn't come down the beach. My point is, I don't have any questions on the structure of this, at all. You know. I know you said that, Mr. Domino. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I share Trustee Domino's concerns with respect to the drainage plan and that it's linked with the structure that you built, that there is no issue with excessive loading from water damning up behind structures and others. I'm not an engineer, so my concern is that the drainage review is also tied in with the structure review to make sure it is not �Y. , Board of Trustees 53 February 19, 2014 somehow going to result in excess of weight loading on the bluff That's a concern that I have. MR. GENTRY: May I. The first six-hundred yards of backfill were loamy material, for the base of the wall. Then the remaining thousand to 1,200 yards were sand. Which sand has a great leaching capability and doesn't surcharge the wall. The drainage that the engineer designed will work.We have to cut it toward the house. We have to make a swale, bring it around, and bring it into a catch basin in the driveway. And I saw your request for the elevations and the slopes on the drainage. As far as that goes. The best way, on all of this, and I have been out there to inspect it, and I have not been out there since the snow, but I have been watching it during these storms, and nothing has, there has been no excessive runoff, any leaching, any stuff going on. And I know that area gets a lot of horizontal rain, and when it comes out of the northeast, it just hits that property. So I'm willing to go there to explain the drainage, to go back over the whole drainage plan, to monitor the drainage after it's installed. You know. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER:We did in-house discussion on this job. The actual inspection date --you are talking about when you and Jim and I were on the site? TRUSTEE DOMINO: No, after that. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I know, l had done a separate line drawing of the platform subsequently. But that was 1/29. We were there in January. TRUSTEE DOMINO: I'm trying to determine dates. In November, when we met with you, we walked around the building, I did a close and careful observation of the foundation, on the Emery house, and I did not discern any cracks in the foundation. However in the subsequent inspection, which Mr. Bredemeyer is looking up the date now, I noticed numerous cracks. So I'm just trying to highlight my concerns for this. And I respect your professionalism and your expertise, but I have serious concerns about that. And particularly the returns on the neighbors' sides. As it stands right now, I feel, I'm very uncomfortable voting for this unless I know additional information. MR. GENTRY: May I explain, what happens, and I'm sure you people are aware of this, in lay terms, there is the term densification and engineered soil. When all this soil removed by the storm, we bring in new soil. It's compacted to a certain grade, okay, over time. The old soil is much denser, much stronger. This soil has been put in place, whatever, five months ago, and it is still locking up, and the foundation of the property is moving. And I have been monitoring it, and it has not moved in, you know, I think I was out there two months ago. We have been measuring the cracks in the foundation. And my point is, is that when engineered soil is put in place, without, you know, in the r + Board of Trustees 54 February 19, 2014 Midwest they don't even drive piles. They go around with big seven to ten-thousand pound hammers and they pound the soil, they densify it. And what it does is give the soil a strength characteristic. On Long Island, we put engineered soil in and plate-tamped it, but that only gives a certain amount of weight in certain areas. But as it settles up there will be no more, I can't say there will be no more cracking; I suggest we at least underpin the house with some helical piles. But the characteristics of an engineered soil and existing soil are completely different. The strength of it. It's like there's two types of concrete. There is concrete that is going to crack and there is cracked concrete. Concrete always cracks. And this house was built— half the house is ten-inch block and half the house is 12-inch block. I'm not saying the storm didn't help it, you know. The only worse thing, it could have been in Jersey. But half the house was built different ways. There were old cracks before the storm also in the foundation. But I share your concern, and my explanation of the settling is the house did move. And that's what I was afraid of. I didn't want to be on the cover of the Southold Press or the paper out here because the house fell down the bluff. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Just to recap the discussions the Board has had on the two recent work sessions that we have had, we obviously need to see the fines, the settlement with the court. We need to get the drainage review of the town engineer. I think based on the concerns of Trustee Domino and myself, we are going to want linkage to that with a review by the Suffolk County Soil people so there is an engineering review that ties into the types of soils and type of material you put down that meets up with the type of construction. know the Trustees have discussed that the stairs at the beach are not in conformity; with the platform out over the beach and down to the beach, below the bulkhead, does not conform with the type of construction we'd like to see along Nassau Point, because it is rather massive and doesn't allow for seasonal removal or moving so that maintenance could be conducted on other properties up and down the beach. Previously mentioned is a final execution of an indemnification agreement to the satisfaction of our attorney. And I believe we may have modified the description here, we wanted to have everything on the as-built and then make sure we hold the proposed upper deck, it's just a separate matter, after we include the permitting for all the as-built activities that took place. I don't know, is there anything else the Board can add to that? MR. LARK: I have one comment on the stairs to the beach. The engineer designed them specifically, and historically the owner had informed the contractor that almost after every northeaster, the stairs that were always there historically since the late Board of Trustees 55 February 19, 2014 60s early 70s, almost after every northeaster they were gone, they were washed away. That's when he did his study as to why this is a target zone, this particular property. So the way they designed it, with the reinforced plastic and the flow through stairs and side-wise, is to have minimal impact so they just don't completely get destroyed every time we have a northeaster. That specifically is the reason to do it that way. And they put in all that grading any everything else to protect the splashing. So it was well thought out and designed by the engineer. Chris, do you want to refer to that, on the stairs? MR. GENTRY: We carried the strength of the soldier piles on the face of the wall with the onshore stringer because every time the actual stairs, I had dialogue with the owner, every time the actual stairs were faced into the weather, which basically let's say zero three zero heading, if you look out the back of her house, give or take ten degrees, every time the stairs would get wiped. So we built it with the strength of the soldier piles and we cantilevered it out and put a pile here and pile here to hold it, where only the offshore string would take the hit versus both the stringers taking the hit and the stairs taking the up lift of the waves. That's why we built those stairs that way. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I think particularly for this location, where it is subject to inundation with tides of the bulkhead face and the difficulties that all property owners have along that shoreline for maintenance, that platform and stair construction seaward of the bulkhead is not going to be acceptable. We are going to have to have it as a seasonally removable stairs, as was there with the prior construction, it could be made of aluminum, it can be hinged so it can be hoisted up, or constructed in such a fashion it could be pulled up. But the current construction will really not be acceptable. It will diminish neighboring properties from maintaining their structures, and I think it's a precedent we don't want to set on this beach. TRUSTEE DOMINO: Again, the problem with this application is, and 1 respect your ability, your construction abilities, but you had a dialogue with the owner when you should have had a dialogue with the Trustees. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I'm uncomfortable moving ahead with this on any kind of approval, but I think we may have enough of a shop list here for the applicant to return with the items that we discussed. We table the application and get a return on the drainage report of the town engineer and soil conservation service and a description of how the soils and the structure will work together so there is not excessive flowing down the bluff, a new set of plans for the platform and the stairs below, at and below, on the seaward side of the bulkhead, conclude working with our town attorney on the indemnification, and Board of Trustees} 56 February 19, 2014 settling the issue of the fines before the Court; and the planting plan that Mr. Lark spoke of. And the proposed 200-square foot deck, we would amend to strike from the current application, and that can be brought in as a separate matter when we conclude the as-built permitting. That can be an amendment to the permit at a subsequent date. MR. GENTRY: Thank you. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Is that clear enough? MR. GENTRY: That's crystal clear, thank you. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: I'll make a motion to table this application pending receipt of this additional information TRUSTEE SANDERS: Second. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Motion to adjourn TRUSTEE SANDERS: I'll second that. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: All in favor? (ALL AYES). Respectfully submitted by, John M. Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees RECEIVED APR 2 44 2014 S6UtholdT n Clerk �®2 OFFICE OF THE E N G I N E E R James A. Richter, R.A. FOR YOUR INFORMATION. oove- itc4lZr-" DIF LL, jW— PLAN CACC4C G`5-° -lb 1 45r W�ffl- ADDIV096�� 05 QgQot?-eo doe ;)qP ravA-t- Ctm'p 23(.® 'D-CiAAVC 4Ls0 9N CLuVeO A BLAijt4- copy C�- e Cove. h@, ' C gef,tt t IST. OpLtA6e IH F®Rm AjlPLtcA�rt *r ALL W FoRm p,,`Ccou tepjestcD IS 'ReQv ®R- .9 pLe,- AWL aCAr" Me ,0S"1FQ/rCHAPTER 236 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PLAN CHECK LIST 0 DATE: 2 o; T APPLICANT (Property Owner,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) O NAME: -U I tw E'M a p'y S C T M #: 1000 (( 13 Telephone Number: District Section Block Lot S M C P -Plan Requirements: The applicant must provide a Complete Explanation and/or validation of all Information Required by this Checklist if it has not been provided 1. A Site Plan drawn to scale Not Less that 60'to the inch MUST If You answered No or NA to any Item, Please Provide Justification Here! show all of the following items- YES NO NA If you need additional room for explanations, Please Provide additional Paper. a. Location& Description of Property Boundaries I K 1 0 b. Total Site Acreage. =®= T TTL S ITE AC R 6 A GF, f o1W<. LAflD O/ST!/f-BAH2Z c. Existing-Natural & Man Made Features within 500 L.F. ®== of the Site Boundary as required by§236-17(C)(2) d. Test Hole Data Indicating Soil Characteristics&Depth to Ground Water ®0 fftt vt O e, 5-0(L +jAP AC.T15 P,(5?I S --(.54 e. Limits of Clearing & Area of Proposed Land Disturbance. Amo De'ptm C OUMp Lkw ' f. Existing & Proposed Contours of the Site (Minimum 2'Intervals) OT FROViD&D g. Location of all existing & proposed structures,roads, driveways, sidewalks, drainage improvements&utilities. h. Spot Grades & Finish Floor Elevations for all existing& proposed structures. I. Location of proposed Swimming Pool and discharge ring. 0� j. Location of proposed Soil Stockpile Area(s). 0=® k. Location of proposed Construction Entrance/Staging Area W. 0 0y(15-ri VLUAYY 1. Location of proposed concrete washout area(s). 00© in. Location of all proposed erosion&sediment control measures. a-V O>♦ p oo 2. Stormwater Management Control Plan must include Calculations showing that the stormwater improvements are sized to capture,store,and infiltrate +AL L on-site the run-off from all impervious surfaces generated by a two(2")inch 0®0 �� W t • rainfall/storm event 3. Details&Sectional Drawings for stormwater practices are required for approval. Items requiring details shall include but not be limited to: a. Erosion& Sediment Controls. "FK--11=1 [SOT f ov6 e. L M V SeAL5 83 b. Construction Entrance&Site Access. 0 0® ASH 1 N e c. Inlet Drainage Structures (e.g.catch basins,trench drains,etc.) 0 0 Old 5SC 1 v4 V& DRAi14 ' d. Leaching Structures (e.g infiltration basins,swales,etc.) 0 0PROVIDe N$ O&'S W&Yh D&PIVTC FORM # SWCP Check List-TOS JAN 2014 Ground Surface Chimney With Grate or asphalt a5 5h( as shown Z-011 o o G" PVC Drain Pipe 0 o I I 6'Qi e e as shown I I I II I 1 1 LiMlt5 of work area 30/� ,G�9 I I I I II I I II 1 I 1 1 1 Lot 40 6'0" o 0 0 0,�� \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7 g°oJ6 2 I� \ \ \ \ \ ` 1 1 ` 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` 1 1 1 1 11 C o - o o N 1 1 1 1 1` s0 - - - — 0 — v - - Degrade away o cundation _ _ _ \ �� \ 1 1 o I ► I II 1 1_ `I 1 1 o ('Q" e o I I I to french drai�ide weep 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ \ holes in timber wall from drain `\ \ \ - - 46 - - - 5 \ +� 1 6) N ' \ \S( \ \ \ , � � � I ► 1 1 1 1 1 \O 0 Clean Sand Backfill p\ oc 1 0� 2'-0" Min to Ground Water \ 2 \ \\ \ \ \ / \ 1 II I II I 1 11°1 1 1 ` 1 1 11 I II 1 0 0 CP \ \ \ \ Prop, 6 ft Pia,fools ,1 \ \ S I I 1 1 1 tt�n (tip) \ Existin As halt Driveway _ 1 1 1 1 Jut 2 0 O 21-011— \ 2 sections with grate p \ 9 p �_ \ ► 1 1 1 on 1 1 \ I I 001 #2\ al Leachin I \\ \ \ � �` � I I 1 1 1 Typic q Pool 1 \ \ Sit NTS 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ ➢ ' Soil Characteristics and depth to ground water (if found) will be _ — — — \ \ \ \ 10 \ \ 0 75 determined by engineer during leaching pool installation and recorded (Assumed to be sand) 5FCUM FAKic ro sfff.5 \ �� \ \ \ \ Lo 1. 41 Lawn \ A� \ �\ , �► I I ► 1 ' I 1 \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ or FLOW I"I x "I/2"x \ U \ \ IN, \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ 6VAPF \ o \ \ \ \ CY00 I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Prop,Trench 17rain on \ a 16"MIN 0 Pool #I 6�t Pia, pods 2 sections \ \ \ 1 " PVG D� ted ra w�6" PVC Prainpipe \ \ 1 Ora j kj, D \ \ \ Prop. 6 R Pia.1 Pool #3 \ \ Pc:l #I 0 G \ \ pool 3 sections \ \ .FxI5ting A5phalt DrivevAy \ \ with grate \ Typical S i It Fence Detail Temporary Silt Fence � 1 Tempor\art�Siltfenc. \ u \\ I °3 ok1w LEGEND11 I i r 57 8 0 \ I 0 I I Runoff Direction N ote5: 0 0I — G" PVC Perforated Drain Pipe All work done In accordance with all a licable, State and I hp I —�--�— 4" PVC Drain Pipe local codes. Drawings based on Surveys provided by John C. Ehlers Lot 42 Ds Downspout dated 05- 14-201 3 and 4-25- 14 and site V151t5 July 20, August 2G and October 30,201 3. DW Drywell 5prinkler5 may be Installed G" below grade 30 0 30 GO Gutter can drain into french drain If drainpipe 15 Increased to 8". Graphic Scale DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED Contact TOS Engineering at 765-1560 before Backfilt, OR Provide Engineer's Certification that the drainage has been installed to Code. Property: Peconlc Bay EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROLS Shall include but not be limited to: Total Area: 30,379 56[ ft A well maintained Construction Entrance, 0.6974 Acres Wire Backed Silt Fencing,stabilization Total Land D15turbance: 3,800 5G1 ft2 `/o Pea G 2 °�o 510 re a Seeding of exposed and/or inactive soils. Slope Tur Turf7 7— Stormwater Drainage Calculations: � 12'' Min APPROVAL OF STORM ATER MANAGEMENT Roof Area - 1 800 5q ft C= 01.05 Q=.06 cfs 268 cf/h r // CONTROL LA -To n ode C r 36> _ _ �J I I Perforate� Enter Fabric Date: �w " Driveway Area - 3000 s ft C= 1 .0 Q= . I G4 cfs 593 cf/hr Approve b : Turf Area - 3800 5CI ft C 0.30 Q= .052 cfs 168 cf/hr brain Pipe Ex15tIn� Sheetln� Wall pp Y 5TORMWATER CALCULATIONS FOR A 2" RAINf=ALL _._. _. 1 n At Back of house Dralna e Swale len th A rox. 150 ft D ra 1 na e5\A/ale, Sect o 1' # NTS 5 / Ge- i;-v� 'S MAY 1 9 2014 E-hr,ter 40 l SELF Dan 5ellcjmann PE Seacoast Construction Ellen Emery Residence 24 Cherry Lane , Nuntlnojton , NY 1 1 743 Y 5925 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 h ; SCALE DRAWING No. 5ayville , N Dralna e planLIC : 077043 Suffolk County Tax # 1000- 111 - 13-6 Lot 41 � "'' AS SHOWN 077045 Q� ' DP- TF r sF�,y"1 MADE BY IDS DATE 05-08- 14 5'-10-1 CH'KD BY DATE Scott A. Russell osu�k j� 00, James A. Richter, R.A. SUPERVIS®R co Michael M. Collins, P.E. SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL-P.O.Box 1179 0 53095 Main Road-SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Telephone#: (631)-765-1560 Fax#: (631)-765-9015 MICHAEL.COLLINS@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US ®'� JAMIE.RICHTERQTOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US Office of the Engineer Town of Southold STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW COVER SHEET ( TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT ) PLEASE NOTE: All Contact & Project Information Requested by this FORM is Nessary for a Complete Application. APPLICANT (Property Owner,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) PROPERTY OWNER. (If Different from Applicant) NAME: NAME: ADDRESS: ADDRESS: Telephone Number: Telephone Number: Completed Applications can be picked up at the Engineering Department after being notified by the Department, or; it can be Mailed to the Applicant with the submission of a Self Addressed 8.5"x I F Envelope&Appropriate Postage. DATE: Property Address / Location of Construction Work: SCTM #: 1000 District Section Block Lot Required Documents for Stormwater Review: Copy of Complete Building Permit Application. Stormwater Management Control Plan. (2 Sets) Note: SMCP's are required whenever Grading or Excavations exceed 5,000 S.F,when New Impervious Surfaces are created, and/or when existing Roof Systems, Driveways, Patios or other Impervious Surfaces are Re-Surfaced. De Minimis Projects will NOT be Subject to the Submission of a SMCP During the Stormwater Review! Note: These Projects would be Limited to Interior Renovations, Replacement of exterior Doors&Windows, Deck Construction with Loose Fit Decking, Installation and/or Modification of Mechanical Systems or other similar Work. A Complete Description of the Scope of work Proposed under the Building Permit Application. A Completed Stormwater Review Checklist. If No or NA are Indicated, Justification is Required. **** FOR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY **** Reviewed By Date: Approved: ❑ Additional Information Required: FORM 4 SMCP-TOS JAN 2014 os111FQk CHAPTER 236 jd STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PLAN CHECK LIST Z DATE: APPLICANT (Property Owner,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) SCTM #: 1000 NAME: > District Section Block —Co-F I Telephone Number: S M C P -Plan Requirements: The applicant must provide a Complete Explanation and/or validation of all Information Required by this Checklist if it has not been provided 1. A Site Plan drawn to scale Not Less that 60' to the inch MUST If You answered No or NA to any Item, Please Provide Justification Here, show all of the following items: YES NO NA If you need additional room for explanations, Please Provide additional Paper. a. Location& Description of Property Boundaries 00� b. Total Site Acreage. 0 0 c. Existing-Natural & Man Made Features within 500 L.F. of the Site Boundary as required by§236-17(C)(2). d. Test Hole Data Indicating Soil Characteristics&Depth to Ground Water. 0 e. Limits of Clearing & Area of Proposed Land Disturbance. 00� f. Existing & Proposed Contours of the Site (Minimum z Intervals) 00 g. Location of all existing & proposed structures,roads, driveways, sidewalks, drainage improvements&utilities. h. Spot Grades & Finish Floor Elevations for all existing& proposed structures. I. Location of proposed Swimming Pool and discharge ring. 000 j. Location of proposed Soil Stockpile Area(s). 000 k. Location of proposed Construction Entrance/Staging Area(s). 000 1. Location of proposed concrete washout area(s). 000 M. Location of all proposed erosion&sediment control measures. 0 2. Stormwater Management Control Plan must include Calculations showing that the stormwater improvements are sized to capture,store,and infiltrate on-site the run-off from all impervious surfaces generated by a two(2")inch 000 rainfall/storm event. 3. Details&Sectional Drawings for stormwater practices are required for approval. Items requiring details shall include but not be limited to: a. Erosion & Sediment Controls. b. Construction Entrance&Site Access. 0�0 c. Inlet Drainage Structures (e.g catch basins,trench drains,etc) 000 d. Leaching Structures (e.g.infiltration basins,swales,etc.) FORM * SWCP Check List-TOS JAN 2014 John Bredemeyer, President o�%UFFOL,,rco Town Hall Annex Michael Domino, Vice-President 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders h P.O. Box 1179 John Bredemeyer o Southold,NY 11971 Michael J. Domino y�od , �� Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Jamie Richter & Michael Collins Town Engineers FROM: John Bredemeyer, Presiden Board of Trustees DATE: February 5, 2014 RE: Drainage Plans for ELLEN F. EMERY 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD, CUTCHGUE SCTM#: 111-13-6 Attached is a proposed drainage plan for the above referenced property which is to be heard at our February 19, 2014 Public Hearing. The proposed drainage is for a proposed rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front yard area The Board of Trustees is requesting that your office review the attached drainage plans prepared by Seacoast Construction, dated 11/27/13 according to Chapter 236 of the Town Code and that the project will contain runoff from going down the bluff or onto the abutting properties. This plan is not to scale; however, there is one original drainage plan in the file. If you need the original it can be forwarded, but it must be returned by February 19tH If you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to ask. I 1 I 304 4g Lot 40 • J ° 3 A 7O u D J '• Zwak a-M rmn f..bU. Ia Gedh d-an.Pmt-x:cp hie-ele_Trdl6wdan d m 5 6' g�8 3 @ ,`� 3 - P _ n ° Pdned My m o oY o. 0 ) Wh 6'Gdta $ O P,nAe vOnlrA o. u ° Jute N,aKm9(tyP) e o on Slope \ \ 88 o C n e o Lot 4 I ODS raMP�pe O \A��CDPe. of ��Vall 3 B Via.17.h err.p a ` Pyta�N 3p3.6 ]D �� Maimvn 5 xdtra aus • ` Asphalt Dnvcway d'°"`v Ww,qntc D Al $ S.�S°36'Z011W LEGEND O 0 2 �y Runoff Direction "czwIr 4'PVC Perforated Drain Pipe i,� Ntor Pabnc Lot 42 a --�>— 4'PVC Drain Pipe D5 Downspout 30 O 30 GO Drainage 5wale 5ectlon DW Drywll Graphic 5cale 0 r Notes: VO DG��/ 9 done in ac—clanc�h all applicable state and DG `7 C '^^••---•�-^ •^ Ioeai codes. Dr n s based on 5ury wtded John C.Ehlers rdated, 30,2013 SpnnkIL 3 and site visits July 20,August 26 and O JAN 1 7 2014 may be metalled 6'blow grade Z Gutter can drain into french drain if drain size is increased to 0. L SIjIIUfUIia ivttiri T 077043 �p�C' Board of Trustees OF �� Dan Seh,gmann I'f- Seacoast Construction LIC: 077043 Sayville, NY Ellen Emery ResidenceDDrtAW Na Na. rainage Plan SGLLE 5925 Nassau Paint Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 AS SHOWN D 1p — ` MOE Of()S onrE' 1 1-27-13 ` --- CH'KD 9Y DnTE O_vU � G • a *. C VM i � a v 1 � -.,�_ - -, � �� "• "err:_f' - . . y Ile or 'r7y"' Z_ Lc.Tch *4 mL 1 r ` c /➢I .4K _•. i a i AMIL , v i dk - 7 i_9 r ar.t f• - f � •� ` µ. � "�' `�j � mac' Pik R. si - ------ -------------- �- At .. i; �� s 111111 1 , - t � r ,i 4 . a J 7 1 i 7 �:; 'cid � '� �� . '' � � t ��, . � �. a. _ �,r , K � � �_ w;. - .i�. i? � � :'�i t. �h�,�. i- x'1`0 +� a =tai 3 � �.� � � � ,.i ;y�' V� � Ft•��f� A � �' �,� X �� i '•F';. • � \ } 1 � � '+:. yr C � w� eJ ✓ �� i.::. y L � /J s �. : ;; .�� I .� ��. �� . 1 , :. � �� F f �^' F' - . .�:. .:, ��, 1, � L � I .. ,.. � � r / _t'� - 4� �s J �� _- :;otrt�' ,. _� � ; � T � -� � � way�!a 0.� 1. �. John Bredemeyer, President TjfIO Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice President �O l0 54375 Main Road James F. King P.O.Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders CP Southold,New York 11971-0959 �Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 `,oUM Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 11, 2014 Mr. Richard F. Lark Lark & Folts, Attorneys at Law PO Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD, CUTCHOGUE SCTM #: 111-13-6 Dear Mr. Lark: The Board of Trustees has submitted the proposed drainage plan for the rear- yard drainage system to direct roof runoff and surface water away from the house foundation and upland retaining wall to the Office of the Engineer for the above referenced property. On February 6, 2014, the Town Engineer reviewed the proposed plan based'on the criteria that is listed on the Stormwater Management Control Plan Checklist. At this time, an approval cannot be granted on the proposed drainage plan since more information is needed by the Town Engineer. The attached checklist has been marked to show what additional information is required for an approval under Chapter 236 of the Town Code (Stormwater Management) along with a blank copy for your records. Please submit all necessary information as soon as possible so the review process can be completed. If you have any questions, please call our office at (631) 765-1892. incerely, John M. Bredemeyer III President, Board of Trustees JMB/amn John Bredemeyer, President o�%gFF014, Town Hall Annex Michael Domino, Vice-President 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders W P.O. Box 1179 John Bredemeyer Southold,NY 11971 Michael J. Domino y�01 , �a�! Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Jamie Richter & Michael Collins Town Engineers FROM: John Bredemeyer, Presiden J.p' Board of Trustees DATE: February 5, 2014 RE: Drainage Plans for ELLEN F. EMERY 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD, CUTCHGUE SCTM#: 111-13-6 Attached is a proposed drainage plan for the above referenced property which is to be heard at our February 19, 2014 Public Hearing. The proposed drainage is for a proposed rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front yard area The Board of Trustees is requesting that your office review the attached drainage plans prepared by Seacoast Construction, dated 11/27/13 according to Chapter 236 of the Town Code and that the project will contain runoff from going down the bluff or onto the abutting properties. This plan is not to scale; however, there is one original drainage plan in the file. If you need the original it can be forwarded, but it must be returned by February 19tH If you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to ask. John Bredemeyer, President �oSUFFotTown Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President tea° �Gy 54375 Route 25 James F. King y P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: �- ��— �- 1 `) -1`I Lark & Folts, Esqs. on behalf of ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 1 00' timber pile vinyl sheet bulkhead; as-built 80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±25' landward of bulkhead; as-built 80' mid-bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±55' landward of bulkhead; as-built 85' timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with a 12' return and a 25' return located ±10' landward from top of bluff; as-built bluff stairs from top of bluff to beach consisting of a 4'x7' access platform leading to a 4'x28' set of stairs with associated 75sq.ft. platform to a 4'x7' set of stairs with associated 95sq.ft. platform to a 4'x17' set of stairs leading to a 4'x13' walkway with a 4'x10' set of stairs to beach parallel to bulkhead, supported by 8" timber pile posts and composite materials on stair treads and decking; as-built 1,800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material with placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff; for a proposed rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front yard area; and for a proposed 200sq.ft. deck of composite decking supported by 6"x6" posts located 10' landward from top of bluff. Located: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 111-13-6 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation „sem 91 Info needed: ( Modifications: 441 y �l Conditions: F Present Were: �J. Bredemeyer M. Domino J. King C. Sanders Bay Constable Other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: J ELLEN F. EMERY 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 January 10, 2014 ns'n_; Board of Southold Town Trustees JAN 2 7 2044 Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 '"''~ Dear Members of the Board: So that the Board has some understanding of what happened to my property as a result of Hurricane Sandy, I am enclosing some pictures that friends of mine have given me this past year: Photo No. Date Description 1 October 9, 2011 My stairs and bluff before Hurricane Sandy 2 January 22, 2013 My bulkhead after Sandy 3 January 22, 2013 My bulkhead and retaining walls after Sandy 4 January 22, 2013 Water erosion to observation deck 5 June 9, 2013 Bluff 6 July 14, 2013 Bluff 7 October 17, 2013 Top vinyl retaining wall 8 November 2, 2013 Bluff and stair system Ver truly your llen F. Emery f-x � �,A. )##s 4 .- f �.)�'�k �'.,7 4+_ � * �yR✓4�f�S' �. �� _ � �• 0.r t X'F' .d 4 V , F c awn ..rr •w..r �w.w 77 wry aIlT MM —7777-7ZT77 f � � IJ U JAN 2 7 '2J. �. .w Board of Trustees r w p +. A e 1 i F kt x � 7 ti ' p s 1 s ' n , •��w ��r a :j� ..♦ a � �J , � '. I 1 '♦ $ W 40 ♦ v - .yam �r� .�t�t,�r � -� .� ""'� ��^c, .�►�' r- r. JO j iL NOW - C ,y ' e • 'r ♦h • j }'tea .n Sr r a �, _. �_ _ ,� .• tit^ • s Y3 1' _ .ru r r r ,•-- d + mr ,x od. y _ w r- , £F f • I N i • n i t � <a Awl Jt k7l Alt!- 4w — , ��IN .*." :� �1[ • _' T' '' .� M !i i, `i•^ 't`F of +At =MUMMIAMI 'L'wF �. Y'• ��wt"'��`.`.-:tea , �"t" � ' `W{iF 4�- s - kk OW w. n t p I 1 f LARK&FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 Tele.No.(631)734-6807 RICHARD F.LARK Fax No. (631)734-5651 MARY LOU FOLTS E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com January 23, 2014 Elizabeth Cantrell and Amanda Nunemaker Clerks, Southold Board of Town Trustees LJA P �P N 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 4 2014Re: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trusteeof the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Tr SCTM #1000-111. 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Dear Mrs. Cantrell and Ms. Nunemaker: In reviewing our file on the above-captioned matter, my secretary discovered that the enclosed color photographs provided to us by the engineer, Daniel Seligmann, P.E. , had been inadvertently omitted from the original application. These photographs are part of Exhibit F, Items 1 and' 2, and have been labeled appropriately. If it is not too much trouble, I would respectfully ask that you remove the black and white photos from the original application and insert these photos in their place. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Very truly yours, Richard F. Lark :mdh Encs. .16 Ap r PM .. Photo No. 1 s � ,• AW 'Y. a r •� r M �a r • Photo No. 2 5 � Y i � Ys. F x _ Amikk <r" f l Photo No. 3 4 'yam, �+1*t..#�, S:".►t __ '+.r�4_ - Photo No. 4 6 't AN s +' Apo Photo No. 5 4 001 ir i b e ' y , r Photo No. 6 7 A a t� t : Photo No. 7 Photo No. 8 8 i PHOTOS: 1 47 i i Photo 1 lip V- ur-.,"ys 2. V 4 ♦J r:��l�- � .,.�tip►,. .r 5 Photo 2 w s i , i Photo 3 6 ('lhoto 4 E^ v Photo 5 7 1 1 Photo • f • Photo 7 5 {rf _e Photo 8 9 Board of Trustees Application JAN 1 7 2014 GNERAIL DATA (continued) I- Hgard of 5uatlio,h hiJ�u Trustegs Ex D - Affidavit of Ellen F. Emery, sworn to on January 10, 2014 Ex E - Letter of Ellen F. Emery dated January 10, 2014 enclosing 8 copies of photos Ex F - Seacoast Construction, Inc. - CONSTRUCTION REPORT OF EMERY PROPERTY DAMAGED BY HURRICANE SANDY Attached to this report are the following items: Item#1: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E.,December 12, 2013, "Inspection of Bluff, Erosion Repairs and Erosion Protection, new retaining walls, as built drawings and details, drainage plan and recommendations", with the following attachments: A. Plan: As Built Retaining Walls, Drawing#101, 12-12-13; B. Plan: As Built Retaining Wall Details, Drawing#102, 12-12-13; C. Plan: Drainage Plan, Drawing DP-1, 11-27-13; D. Plan: Proposed Deck Details, Drawing#D-1, 1-8-14. Item#2: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E.,November 15, 2013, "Inspection of House Foundation". Item#3: Building Permit#38536, issued by Southold Town Building Department, 11-27-13. Ex G - Survey of premises by John C. Ehlers Land Surveyor last revised 11-20-2013 2a i� Confirmation Receipt re:ELLET: 'MERY-5925 Nassau Point Rd Page I of 2 I� From: SandyR1 <SandyR1@gw.dec.state.ny.us> To: larkandfolts<larkandfolts@aol.com> Subject: Confirmation Receipt re: ELLEN F. EMERY-5925 Nassau Point Rd ?; Date: Wed,Jan 30,2013 11:46 am J A N 1 7 2014 Attachments: General_Permit_GP-0-12-006.secure.pdf(71K) ij Jilu(I�:h� 1Giti ub'ect: General Permit GP-0-12-006 - Hurricane Sandy General Perm t Board f Trustees This confirms our receipt of your Notice of Intent for GP-0-12-006 which is the General Permit authorizing recovery and repair work associated with storm damage from Hurricane Sandy. _ A copy of the General Permit is attached and it is also available on DEC's webpage, r littp://www.dec.ny.gov/public/76659.litinl. i Please ensure that those doing the actual work understand and comply with all terms and conditions of the General Permit.Any failure to conform with the scope of activities and conditions of this permit shall be treated as a violation of the Environmental Conservation Law If you have questions or encounter unforeseen problems during the course of the work,contact the Regional Permit Administrator for your county: For Nassau and Suffolk Counties: NYS DEC REGION 1 Regional Permit Administrator SUNY @ Stony Brook 50 Circle Road Stony Brook,NY 11790-3409 I (631)444-0365 fax:(631)444-0360 email:rldepRgw.dec.state.ny.us I ! Or Contact: NYS DEC Division of Environmental Permits 625 Broadway Albany,NY 12233-1750 (518)402-9167 fax: (518)402-9168 email: depprmt n•gw.dec.state.ny.us >>>Sarah Evans 1/30/2013 9:50 AM>>> Came to me.directly because I spole to her on the phone. Please process as usual.Thanks, Sarah >>> <larkandfolts anaol.com> 1/29/2013 2:07 PM>>> Dear Ms. Evans: Please see the attached letter and Notice of Intent for General Permit. If you have any questions, or need further information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Mary D. Holland Secretary htto://mail.aol.com/37309-111/aol-6/en-us/mail/PrintMessaae.asnx 1/30/2013 ' r"9 NEW YORK STATE DEPA2,_--.,-,ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERV2L''.-.—N Gelaeral Permit Number GP-0-12-006 PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) GENERAL PERMIT GP-0-12-006 JAN 17 2014 Hurricane Sandy General Permit M3 ty ittion and Facili I� Permit Issued Facility: Af f ected owner Location Listed on Notice of Intent Appl� able DEC Region(s): 1,2,3 Genelal Permit Authorized Activity: General Permit for repair of damages resulting from Hurricane Sand, ss Description of Authorized Activities: 1. Stabi1ization,.9,f=_exi§tiff i6hal..storm-damaged dwellings,decks and walkways with tem.por bracing an&-iffil4s; 2. Construction of a single 4' wide access walk0V_dy.-,,to,,access damaged dwellingsj,00`1�, M, 3.Ifistallation of up to four rows of sandbags or 1 cubic and sand!cube9,1fffe toe of storm damagedk struqtures or eroded escarpments; 4.Pllcement of sand and/or material equivalent to existing material at the toe of eroded ese ments U 5.Qair or reconstruction of stairways that were functional before Hurricane Sandy; 6.Re-Fade eroded dunes; 7.In-ki�d/in.-Place-,,,,repair,,,,Qrixeconstr.uction,-of.,bulkhpads,andshoreline,exosionystwaiQturres4h functional before Hurricane Sandy.; n qrra�.!,,Wm, -,p ME-��Z 6 �1,1_0 KIM,3,1 co!-=�a w, W,ni . 'i p��W%0 8.Repair 6tjeconstruclibn 6f existmj$Mi�'F62s,bria-ges,utilities and_6ffier`pdblic__inftastrq 0 _tbture. All work shat Ndone according to the permit conditions contained herein. 61 Permit Authorizations 6V Tidal Wetlands- Under Article 25'x"'„ Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expirationl)e6� I 120f3- F y Excavation&Fill in Navigable Waters -Under Article 15,Title 5 Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Water Quality Certification-Under Section 401 -Clean Water Act Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Coastal Erosion Management-Under Article 34 Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Page 1 of 6 1 NEW YORK STATE DEPAL'___.:..ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA__:.:_v !, Geheral Permit Number GP-0-12-006 a ' ,a NYSDEC Approval By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, and all conditions included as part of this permit. 1 General Permit Authorized by ,F <= s Permit Administrator:JOHN�J.'IRGUSON, Chief Permit Administrators ;K Address: NY9DEC HEADQUARTERS R3�r X25 BROADWAY �°r ALBANY,NY 12233 ter, 1, � gnae: ��;.f�,�v:;='V';.v 9;{Zi,'?�;a;,t • - /201'1'� S2 ,Authorized S j "7k •u-s �'rt"-f,.s::d'-iL•.,,, %i..�:'_'3g.%s�_�_�_•- �. $ - `i'L �y 11 \b f' Permit Components 6 n NA URAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS �A i t� W&ERiQUALITY.:CER�TIFICATgIQN SPECIFIC CONDITiOZ\I _. j h;r- � . � k GENBRAL CONDITIONS,APPLY TO AL ,,AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATION$a"f��` 1 ieYF� NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS - Apply to the Follovvingg ,Permits: COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY CER IE�CAT U ;z C 'IV, ,�s�A��._LkIN�N�VIG�BI.��A.T��?�.;�'��AL 1. Conformdnce With Plans All activities authorized by this permit rmust be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or applicant's agent as part of the pert application. Such approved plaps were prepared by the applicant and/or an authorized representative `ftyc Y 2. In-kind,In-place Repair or Reconstruction Existing bulkheads,walkways"Ed shoreline erosion structures that were functio in ,at the time of the storm damage may be rely i ed or reconstructed in- kind and in-place of the existing sfiruetures.No expansion or seaward„dx` sion of bulkheads or shoreline structures is authorized by this 3. Repairs to Structures All repairs to existing structures shall be confined to replacement of existing elements with no change in design, dimension or materials, unless specifically authorized by this permit. 4. Stairway Design The stairs and landings shall be a maximum of 4 feet in width and constructed a minimum of 3 feet above grade over the dune/bluff face. Page 2 of 6 1! i NEW YORK STATE DEPA7' ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA__-_J • General Permit Number GP-0-12-006 5. Backfilling All peripheral berms, cofferdams,rock revetments,seawalls, gabions,bulkheads or other approved shoreline stabilization structures shall be completed prior to placement of any fill material behind such structures. 6. Equipment Operation Equipment operation below the high tide line is strictly prohibited. The 5 storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to the project work area and areas more than 100 feet from the high tide line. .4j, { 7. Sanitary Systems This peripit sloes not authorize filling or re-gr ding of exposed sanitary systems. Landowners must apply fig ate permits to perform repairs or reconstructtq"to sanitary systems. 8. Hydraulically-filled Sandbags, Sand Cubes and Geotubes Hydraulically-filleiltsandbags,sand f i cubes and geotubR are strictly prohibited. 9. Beach Excavation Prohibited for Fill Excavation of the beach or dune for the purpose-of obtaining I. fill materi,`is prohibited. Sandbags may not be filled using sand from the beach or dune areassx� SandbaO,6st be filled with clean sand;no debris or deleterious materials are allowed. OF h 10. Sq dbag and Sand Cube Installation Sandbags and sand cubes must be installed no more t'an four i;ws deep and a maximum of three rows high. } 11. Jj�emoval of S dayandbags and Sand Cubes Sandbags and sand cubes must be removed within 12Q F '� `S} s�a�.,i�stallation,,ori a separate DEC permi�_to allow the.�tr�uctures,to remair�p�z�rr�anetly,.must be w�ie..x:." 1n;,:...aza�,.a�,L_3._Lv;2;0.,.'3__^.`.'_„,.. ., :.:£51,,�'�.r MSs`_S_a:�i1eL�L...�uda"''e:airi:�,',.,�,,, 5::s$s-i,paLn/�+4..x;•+�.:a.Y.cs:,G1::.1C�.F'f��'i'' +_ ;_L:..,.,..IC'G's.`„Y vi., obtained. . ,�`f;M%„r�:iin•i'i:a"": ;6r�;;:(iif:��gr,a- .r7 hL..�'::7.�.4: 12. Tidal;Wetland Vegetation There"sliall.be no disturbance or damage to vegetatetidal=wetlands[qr duneAgetation as a result of the work performed W er this permit. All necessary precautions must be e. aw take to prevent damage or disturbance to these vegetaeci-area# .za; A,. r 13. �t'onstruction Debris All construction debris shall be cleaned up at the end of each work day a " dispc&d properly.No debris is permitted in tidal waters or the beach areas. ' 14. As1-4n Longhorned Beetles Any tree debris within New York City,Nassau or Suffolk counties §' k.-'..�.veT`, fv'2.a '4..;5'..^, 2-44.f'LkK etc 1•'iia l.'"%.u:a'6 \w°i"..$`�'-qv^�' ,.. •<-V hY:Siti:�e`S'?%: '=i-n°-a+'�"Y+.S4- .t^iSY'�i ::l#6!.'�.v'w'i�.'' shall be disposed”T chipping o less than f inch m any two`dimensions,then used as mulch, on control,bildltjg'ag��[tKor fitel: Wood mayonl}�ub'+errto�v�dfrbnAsian Laghtsrieti>Beetlk'q�tontine areas undpermit from the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets d (http://www.agi iculture.ny.gov/PI/alb.html). yr,.# 15. Least Terns aid�Piping Plovers All recovery and repair work occurring in open;sandy beach areas must cease on March 31, 2013 to protect potential habitat for Least Tern iping Plover,unless otherwise authorized in vAiting by the Department. } 16. No Dredging or Excavation 'X6 dr.gdg1-ng,excava ging-o�.othef-1 1 ration of shoreline or underwater areas is authorized by this permit,nor s'-' 111s"suance of this permit be construed to suggest that the Department will issue a permit for such activities in the future. 17. No Interference With Navigation There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. Page 3 of 6 : NEW YORK STATE DEPA]'-__,FENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA___'v General Permit Number GP-0-12-006 18. State Not Liable for Damage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future b operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. .1 19. State May Order Removal or Alteration of Work If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized,or if,in the opinion of the ' Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free rnavigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health,safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the�FgApirati'd�ii`�oi�'revo��fi`on,of this;permit,the structure,fill, excavation, or other modification,4the watercourse hereby authorized``shall not be completed,the owners,shall,without exporise to the State,and to such extent and in such timkand manner as the w; Department of EnvirQzii rental Conservation may require,'remove all or any porti6%pf the uncompleted structure or fill and'z'`estore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity ofthe watercourse. 4; No claim shall,bF made against the State of New York on account of any such removal oNalteration. 20. State 14! �y Require Site Restoration If upon the expiration or revocation of this permif;5the project hereby authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense to the Siate,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation rflay lawfull,y'require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the siteito its formex'condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such rernol al or alteration. : s; 21. ,,recautions Against Contamination of Waters All necessary precautions shall be taken to , preciffdei coritarnihEition ofatiy etl'arid�or' ue18 Oszi'lvents;J, lubricants,epoxy coatigs;,palnks,,.eoncrete,leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with`tiie project. giyy WATER QUALITY CERTIPICATTON'4SDECIEtCCONDITIONS r0 .� lr 1. WUter Quality Certification The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby cert fees that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards uner Sectioris,.301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217)provided that all'of the :{..._ �.cx .•y,..•urn,'g �'r;.a ..�rm;,ra"o...._S:hi.�i,f'e:, rri�.Y°94,..+�:`,�'r'^S:Sr'�`..xK`.?2,na�Y2�'xa':,`�'>r;•Sn'. conditionsisectNlierem ate Yhel. GENERAL CONDITIONS - Apply to ALL Authorized Permits: 1. Facility Inspection 1; The Department Thepermitted site or facility,l�cli�ding relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorize-- resentative of the Department of Environmental Conse kion,(the�Departmont).ao-determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71- 0301 and SAPA 401(3). Page 4 of 6 i NEW YORK STATE DEPAI .___ CNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA ,— J G6neral Permit Number GP-0-12-006 The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit,including all referenced maps,drawings and special conditions,must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. 2. Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department,issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by,theit=Depa�i tFmentS6Hb! of the,terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or detennif ation. 3. Applications For,p--6mit Renewals,Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a separate written aypl'ication to the Department for permit renewal,modification or tr�aslS��fer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Depatftment requires. Any renewaljmodification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. Subit'I�ssion of applicatio7+�isl or permit renewal,modification or transfer are to be submitted to: � � iL ; Regional Permit Administrator ``F5 625 Broadway iV Albany, NY 12233-1750 3 ! S,U 4. Solimis'sion of'Reri'evval Ap1icati®n- -The5pe'r'rriittee=mustrtbmit-a'YerieWal- plication at^l��st� 0 days before permit expiration's,fo ,the following permit authorizations:Tidal Wetlands,Excavatio Fill in Navigabl'e`%iers, Water QualitysCertification Coastal Erosion Management. 5. Kermit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations._by the Departent` The Department jresekyes the right to exercise all available authority to modify, sitsp& or revoke this permit. The ,q grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: {t , CIlk, . 0imaterially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; R :i o-'„"' Q•�l} :�Y• tJ v'uyl45:�:. i '�Y7 {f."` ir"�'•fi � SN .?ed- LYY": 1 ti+n Nn 11.�. �r.—A':'e;T;a'fi3?A;rk?�r«lJiltn' b. fAilur&'by tli `pe iii tt�e td"c'& y itli i °fe rifs of condi"tioTr of'the' 'ertrut, C. exceeding the scope of the projectasdescribed in the permit application; VIN d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conii'itions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the;exsting permit; < .. 00 e. noncompliance 4hpreviously issued permit conditions, orders of�o=.commissioner,any provisions of the Enviforimental Conservation Law or regulationsAaf the Department related to he permitted activity. Y'sf v. , K. . 10,;£" 6. Permit Transfer Permits are transferrable unless specifically prohibited by statute,regulation or another permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actual transfer of ownership. t Page 5 of 6 i NEW YORK STATE DEPA] •ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVE' _� K ' aeneral Permit Number GP-0-12-006 i NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification i` The permittee, excepting state or federal agencies, expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives,employees, and agents("DEC") for all claims, suits, actions, and damages,to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittees undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and maintenanego&the Mlity or ac11,1 s authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in complinee %ith the terms and conditions of the pefli"t,, This indemnification does not extend to any claims,•,suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable i&,QEC's own negligent or intentional acts or og'Aions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC ai Urising under Article 78 of the NSW York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal Qr>state laws. ii •yd Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit tib, The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their rq ,bnsibility to comply with this permit,including all special conditions while acting as th permitt6e's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctii ns for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. ItenVC: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits ¢'i Theo ee is resp Bible oxwQb ainxng any.�otheri�ermits, pproyals,l_ds, easements and rights-a *s,.z�•"i.'w sx>`:, _iti �•L'.i- ::xZ_.:s, >5_.i v.: �+,�r�n'cdsM-:c' s�ia,.tt::J'.- r :�.9�t,.1�»--... "?->^ •+.5.��..�,;dcSnlP-_�`S.Src.Y.l..rhv?.i c:� way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. ,£•trite+✓r'�:4T�a-�'-a.-.SM ric r.§ Item%,N dRight to Trespass or Inter`fere;er!Ith Riparian Rights This-permit does not convey to the permittee any rig4tto trespass upon the landsi r"interfere with the ripat an rights of others in order to perform the permitted=work<lnor�doe's f authorize the impairment Of any fights,title,or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the ff pernut- t' ffif4 b ' Zvk ' t��1�:.,...n:*2�,•�n�2�i^ka i�,.�.+.��J;fs',+�c,.;.�''`1';.�,fY'i:.n.c�w i�'s:.:.....<:,F xAt'�'�:<cnt".:e:'Si'Y1 fifJw';t:5't y:.'9hisrbl-q'l'':2s,::�','•c'xA�}dt,'k}izi,:i'l'(•H.?<:-fi!"=-S'da'es�;kACa7�1;+��+Nr<r 2,:,y:PP?3f�x3:eexeC'r.7.�.,<J'� _§�;�>�8ia?r;s''»t`t::J�FCi.-siv.�ttt'� �r.�.�`:i,s�:3:uXw':: <i.`."�c;:-:;.�h:.'....=fsr,.•:.X:.t'SSY^`.=F: .c=' :.wwA2fc�."sz x,.i:.o trek f.r" Page 6 of 6 -Ogg&-- BOARD OF SOUTHOLD.TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NO®8049 DATE:FEBRUARY 20,2013 ISSUED TO:. ELLEN F.EMERY PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD,CUTCHC SCTM# 111-13®6 JAN 1 7 2012 AUTHORIZATION BoaAr—Lf Tr to Pursuant to*the Provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Boiwd of trustees adopted at the meeting hold on Egbrgja 20,2013 and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$25-0.00 paid by Lark&Folts or authorized waiver of Town Board and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to replace 1001 of failed bulkhead with two 81 returns;replace 100' of failed retaining wall; and replace beach access stairs,all destroyed by Hurricane Sandy- with the condition that a spring inspection of buffer areas be completed to ensure a natural buffer; and as depicted on the project plan prepared by Seacoast Construction,last dated on February 12,,2013 and stamped approved on February 20,2613® IN VRTNESS VMREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. "Ve —------------- W=m BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUS S SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK JAN 1 7 2014 5�ul�Ulj tibvi7�m PERMIT N0.8222 DATE: JUNE Boar f Tru e s ISSUED TO: ELLEN F.EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD,CUTCHOGUE SCTM#111;13-6 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees'adopted at the meeting held on June 19,2013and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Ellen F.Emery 1999 Revocable Trust and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to construct a 198' upper retaining wall with two(2) 13' returns using vinyl sheathing; construct a 1981 mid-bluff wood retaining wall with two (2)131 returns; add clean fill to re-establish•the entire bluff area as needed; construct a platform at top of bluff leading to 41 wide bluff stairs and a 101x10' observation platform along the mid-bluff retaining wall; re-vegetate all disturbed bluff areas using native plantings; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Seacoast Construction Inc.,received on May 28,2013 and stamped approved on June 19,2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. �® $l1EfQ11,�.�OG . ELLEN F. EMERY 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 T0. Members of the Board of no Southold Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss . . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) ELLEN F. EMERY, being duly sworn, deposes and says : 1 . I am Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust, which is the owner of the property at 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York (Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000- 111. 00-13 . 00-006. 000) . I am submitting my request to the Board in affidavit form because, due to health reasons, I might not be able to attend a public meeting to discuss this application. 2 . This application is for an "as built" reconstruction permit for the work which was accomplished by Seacoast Construction, Inc. during the summer of 2013 . The Board issued Permit #8049, dated February 20, 2013, and Permit #8222, dated June 19, 2013 . A new bulkhead and three retaining walls were constructed as well as replacement of the stairs . However, due to circumstances beyond the contractor' s control, the stairs and the retaining wall are not in the exact location as provided for in the plans as location adjustments had to be made during the course of construction. 3 . Superstorm Sandy, which occurred on October 29, 2012, and the subsequent Nor' easter occurring a short time later, completely destroyed the existing wooden bulkhead and the upland retaining wall on the bluff on my property. The storm water 1 �X � F surges completely engulfed and destroyed the bulkhead and retaining wall, scouring out to Peconic Bay a tremendous amount of soil from my property. 4 . The contractor, Seacoast Construction, Inc (Christopher Gentry) began work on April 17, 2013, which was nearly six months after the storms . I have been informed by the contractor that during this period of time there was tidal scouring because there was no bulkhead and retaining wall. The incoming high tide flowed on my property for a considerable distance, and when water flowed out it contributed to the destabilization of the bluff which occurred during the course of construction. 5 . The contractor, after cleaning up the debris from the storm, built a vinyl bulkhead in the place of the old wooden bulkhead. When the contractor was in the process of replacing the retaining wall that was lost during the storm, the bluff above where he was working kept eroding and caving in, destroying what had remained of the existing stairs and platforms . During this period of time, large chunks of bluff randomly caved in, leaving a vertical wall at the top of the bank. There were, two occasions when I was standing in my house that I heard the bluff giving away at the top and I felt the floor under my feet tremble. It was at this point that I panicked and contacted Mr. Gentry and told him he had to immediately do something because I was afraid that the bluff would continue to erode into my backyard and ultimately expose the foundation of my house like happened in Rocky Point along Long Island Sound years ago. 6. I was informed by the contractor that his engineer, Daniel Seligmann, P.E. , had immediately responded and had inspected and tested the soil conditions on the bluff and my backyard by the house foundation. Mr. Seligmann stated that the r 2 erosion had already compromised my house by having the foundation settle. The engineer recommended that a vinyl retaining wall be immediately installed at approximately 10 feet landward from the top of the bluff and another retaining wall be immediately installed midway on the bluff to prevent further recession of the bluff. This was accomplished as rapidly as the contractor could do it, and they filled up the newly-created space on the bluff with clean fill. The result is that the bluff did not recede anymore after they installed these two upper retaining walls . 7 . After the work on the bluff was completed, Christopher Gentry explained to me that the retaining walls could not be built in the locations as originally planned due to the severe erosion of the bluff. These retaining walls had to be placed where directed by the engineer to protect the house. I was none too happy about seeing the ugly retaining wall in my backyard. However, with proper landscaping it can be camouflaged, but more importantly my house should be safe. Due to the settling of the foundation of the house, I had the contractor apply for a building permit from the Building Department to stabilize the foundation to prevent any further settling. 8 . It was also explained to me by the contractor that there were difficulties in installing the stairs due to the steepness of the bluff' s slope angle. To keep the stairs from getting too steep and difficult to use, the stairs had to be built in three sections and, for strength purposes, were offset and connected with a landing. Due to the severe erosion which took place during the construction, it was not practical to build an observation deck on the bluff. 9 . The contractor and the engineer, to further protect my house at the top of the bluff, are applying for approval of a 3 drainage system plan so that the surface water will drain away from both my house and the top of the bluff to a drywell in my driveway. Application is also being made for a 200 square foot deck which would be located in the backyard 10 feet landward from the top of the bluff. Your consideration to my application is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, Ellen F. Emery Sworn to before me this day of January, 2014 r !f f Notar Public W�yyRIC M F.LARK P,b%O935we of NW 00 Yor4t C=nia M E*IM Aug.a1g6)y 4 Fx- P ELLEN F. EMERY 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 January 10, 2014 Board of Southold Town Trustees Town of Southold JAN 1 7 2014 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 `- Board of Tru tees Dear Members of the Board: So that the Board has some understanding of what happened to my property as a result of Hurricane Sandy, I am enclosing some pictures that friends of mine have given me this past year: Photo No. Date Description 1 October 9, 2011 My stairs and bluff before Hurricane Sandy 2 January 22, 2013 My bulkhead after Sandy 3 January 22, 2013 My bulkhead and retaining walls after Sandy 4 January 22, 2013 Water erosion to observation deck 5 June 9, 2013 Bluff 6 July 14, 2013 Bluff 7 October 17, 2013 Top vinyl retaining wall 8 November 2, 2013 Bluff and stair system Ve�ry truly yours Ellen F. Emery f-X a Z S" L ' m 3;i;. fl� +� __. 911• N — _ -j: ,. -� `n pM. �t & �3 R. �� i�4r,`i� � � •, — � "�+fir r w•'?; � � Y �" ' � _ . ". 1-7 �' if �• 2 .Ar �; `dry'M� �,�•` , _ �� i.. ,�ti. s ..e>.~ � _ _ �� "• ,�. y r Ii � � � � I ��III t " �;� � _� v..�._ � ��'�" .fir *., _� ,• � ,".^ e • r � r r .;dam a *77 JAN 1 x"12 r Tr ate s a a Y' y !lw Y x ^� F � t o s. of .. ' < v 91p �pray�i�A� . � Alf rVl g d o _ 01 I syn' r F4 A f .T ll vf q E, R. JAN 1 7 2014 , , B f n. t y M qn �t ._ P� „:w�"D .env m^' .. �. <.•.a '�F 1 w.« 1yy , s T x , , y .-, i Awr s 41 °p y e�. fit. �A .k r � a +s•$ �'�i y, y ��. _ ...'.� �* ; ��` .`<�� `s� wf' "R'� !t �, "4 � .. ♦ $t i �_., t �„r1�it ]fes... 47 ;� � t r F aq, • r 5`>A�y s� I�� III�i '� ,� .y„�° `��.�+P .t"".i�' 3,'m 1✓ - _ �. moi` �; !"�P�1�� ISI '�. i��q ��-" �- - .. fir` ol 51 INCONNIMMM- . '�*'a. >_'�;�,;e •rte�„ � 't-. va��t�" �Y,1�<, • x f ,j{JJ 1, ^ U° b� ri � `� �• �!° i, . �..•'; ySs Y t+. ,eft• AcC � '� � � � �_ art • � rq �s e H � a4 ti 0 K# 0 41 y z � sR 3 7 2 Aw low JAN 1 7 2014 z v t41F µ i Ag y u AN 1 J 7 2�14 oard of Trustees a i KIWI AN 1 7 2014 B l• 1 1Tru tees �' •ri • . mss ,"°� • Y �w #... :♦ �•�< ,ti ^,F.`� .fir '•�'OwF. •� ` .tf:� ,a, � �6 • til{�'iA�t a � _ V= �- �• K wr" 0 SO Jl� � s .�. • ov- >.... .�.:rams aaa ...�.v�.c�.,�s.,....r. .... ..:. _ ___,a .:< .....w ,�..�.�.,,>. ,..,.�s: ,. •.,aR.. .. s. .�.s� �,, .a u, •r..:. �. «��.is ,w, ,.am:i � �. SEACOAST.-CONSTRUCTIO + .wr n.�_ ..e P.O .Bog�893:nµ Sayville, NY 11182 JAN 1 7 2014 ®saa��eacoastd OCI�v4 ,rste, ® ® SD,ttl;Uitlidstii ar of Trustees Christopher M. Gentry Phone: (631) 472-7616 Supervisor Fax: (631) 472-7618 January 10, 2014 Ellen F. Emery 5925 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: CHRISTOPHER M. GENTRY, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the Supervisor of the contractor, Seacoast Construction, Inc., who performed the work at the property of Ellen F. Emery during 2013. 1 am making this report in affidavit form in the event that I will not be able to attend the public hearing of the Board of Trustees to obtain an"as built" permit for the work constructed-by.-Seacoast Construction, Inc. and for,approval to install a drainage system and observation deck at the top of the bluff on Ellen Emery's property. CONSTRUCTION REPORT OF EMERY PROPERTY DAMAGED BY HURRICANE SANDY OVERVIEW Original bulkhead failed, secondary'retaining wall failed, battering and fracturing backside of original bulkhead. Beach stairs became undermined and failed. Observation decks became undermined and subsequently failed. Later inspection revealed that tidal surge was over six feet above existing bulkhead at time of storm. Further tidal scouring occurred after the storm until the new bulkhead was installed. CONSTRUCTION: Work was commenced on April 17, 2013. Initially debris was barged out at flood tides, and the bulkhead was constructed per plan. Due to prior water penetration landward of the bulkhead, difficulty was incurred in placing the deadmen to support the bulkhead so that the work had to be staged and clean fill had to be brought in at this time to raise the level of the soil landward of the bulkhead in order to properly install an anchored deadman system. As stated,this took additional time and effort to properly secure the bulkhead. Upon completion of the work on the bulkhead wall at the shoreline, the construction of the retaining wall was started. This work also had to be staged because during the construction large 1 amounts of soil kept eroding from the bank, making installation very difficult. In fact, on two occasions, when machines were left on the job overnight where the work was being performed, they were semi-buried with sand eroding from the upper portions of the bluff. Also during the construction of this retaining wall, the remaining portion of the stairs and landing observation deck frilly collapsed and were destroyed. It was during the replacement of this first retaining wall that an additional permit for two additional retaining walls was received from the Trustees. However, before this first retaining wall was completed, it became impossible due to the severe erosion from the top of the bluff to install the two additional retaining walls in their proposed locations. Tension cracks were identified in the backyard area near the north and south corners of the house foundation. Fresh cracks were also seen in the foundation, and the owner, Ellen Emery, stated she felt the house settle under her feet. I became very concerned that we would momentarily loose the top of the bluff and there would be serious erosion in the backyard, so on an emergency basis, I had the- engineer, Daniel Seligmann, P.E.,come out and inspect the bluff immediately. At the crest of the bluff, there was a vertical drop of approximately 20 feet and the erosion was continuous, scouring out underneath the crest of the bluff and completely burying the first retaining wall. It was obvious that the erosion was continuous, and Daniel Seligmann, upon inspection, requested that I quickly and carefully install a vinyl retaining wall 10 feet landward of the existing crest of the bluff. The purpose, as he explained,was to stop the possibility,of the continual erosion moving towards the house and the rear yard. The engineer wanted to immediately stop any further compromise of the house foundation. Under his instructions, I immediately installed this retaining wall. To avoid vibration, I augured in the face posts, which were 8"by 16', and immediately backfilled the area. The framing and vinyl sheathing was installed, together with a backing system consisting of 3/a"by 20' tie rods; connected to a hand-dug, lay log pinned deadman system. Daniel Seligmann, on the completion of this upper retaining wall, again inspected the site where the vertical face of the slope was continuing to erode, so he recommended that another retaining wall be installed midway between the lower retaining wall and the crest of the bluff. Locating this last retaining wall in this location would minimize.the unanchored distance down the slope, thereby reducing what is referred to as a soil wedge between the crest of the slope and this retaining wall. This 100' retaining wall was immediately installed using 20' piles, 16' batter piles, and 14' sheet piles. In order to anchor everything properly, ten-ton Helicals, 6' on center, were drilled into the ground. Because there was no soil on either side of this retaining wall when construction was commenced, fill was brought in on a staged basis as the retaining wall was built. At various stages during the retaining wall construction, three sets of stairs were erected to accommodate the angles on the bluff so the stairs would not be too steep. The stairs were connected by two platforms which were constructed and anchored to the retaining walls for additional support. i Due to the property's orientation in relationship to Peconic Bay, it was recommended to install DEC approved vinyl flow-through steps parallel to the bulkhead so that it would be minimally subjected to the tides and extreme northeast winds that occur in this area. Also installed on the top of the bulkhead was flow-through grating. 2 �X• F r Jute erosion control matting was installed and anchored down to the retaining walls to prevent wind erosion. In the spring of 2014, landscapers will install various indigenous plants through this matting, which will ultimately protect the soil on the bluff from wind erosion. Because the house foundation had been compromised, the engineer determined on investigation that this settlement was caused by the rapid collapse of the bluff. He recommended that the northeast and southeast corners and the easterly foundation wall be underpinned. He designed a system of Helical piles for this work and a building permit was obtained from the Southold Town Building Department. I am attaching a copy of the building permit hereto. Also, to prevent any further settling of the house, I requested the engineer to design a drainage system, which was done, and I am attaching a copy of it herewith for approval from the Board of Trustees. Due to the difficulties encountered in the construction of the retaining walls and stairs on the bluff, it was deemed not feasible to build any observation decks as existed previously. The engineer recommended that a 200 square foot observation deck be-placed in the rear yard area 10' back from the crest of the bluff and this plan is being attached hereto for approval by the Board of Trustees. If there are any further questions as to the work that was done to restore the bluff and to protect Ellen Emery's house, do not hesitate to contact me at any time. LLt Respectfully submitted Christopher Gentry Supervisor S 10, day of January, 2014 ROM LARK AMpYork X31,2 y tary Public Attached to this report are the following items: Item#1: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E., December 12, 2013, "Inspection of Bluff, Erosion Repairs and Erosion Protection, new retaining walls, as built drawings and details, drainage plan and recommendations", with the following 1 attachments: A. Plan: As Built Retaining Walls, Drawing#101, 12-12-13; B. Plan: As Built Retaining Wall Details, Drawing#102, 12-12-13; C. Plan: Drainage Plan, Drawing DP-1, 11-27-13. D. Plan: Proposed Deck Details, Drawing#D-1, 1-8-14. Item#2: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E., November 15, 2013, "Inspection of House Foundation." Item#3: Building Permit#38536, issued by Southold Town Building Department, 11-27-13. 3 �X—F Dan Seligrnant., . !E 24 Cho 'Lane, Huntington, NY 11743 . rry, 6314M-2544 908400-3.580 Cell, r7" AN 7 201 2013-001 50 Mold 1U*,1 December 12,.2013 Bear of Trustee CLIENT: oni , -ti-o7 7, PO Box 893 Sayville,NY 1.1782 Lark and'Folt9- Attornevs at Law 28785'Mdin,Road Cutchogue,.NY 11935 REFERENCE: Ellen Emery Residence 5925'Nassau Point Southold,NY, SUBJECT: inspection,of Bluff Erosion,Repairs and.Ero gon Protection,new retaining walls,as.built drawings and details,Drainage plan and-recommendations INSPECTION DATE: July 20,2013,Au 0 -,gust 26,2013�.October 20,2 Q. 0776' QFN . Fx F IrRI-i I SUBJECTi Performed fleldinspection of Retaining walls,bulkhead and evaluate-the slope stability,of existing�bluff.Review drainage requirements on top of bluff as'it effects-the,existing home.All' work was performed,by Seacoast.Constructibn Inc. :AVAILABLE INF2RMATION The,following ififormation,wastprqvided: A. P Application`filed-January,30,2013 B. Authorization dated'February 20,'2013.forPermItI9049 C'. Seacoast Construction Plans dated February 12,2013 stamped,"Approved"on February 20,2013. D. 4h Application,,filed,May 28,2013 E, Authorization,dated-June,19,2013 for Permit#82,22 F. Seacoast Construction plans.received May 28,20131stamped"-Approved"on June,19, 2013, Reference.Documents: G. IBt.Application filed August 11,1011 H, Authorization dated September 21,2011 for'Permit 91652 L Site,Plan provided;by Ned.Harroun received on December 29,201.1'.stamped"Approved" on January 1 t,2012. J. 2nd Application.filed December 23,2011 I I K. Authorization dated January 1-8,2012,for pormif#7706.. n L-� Site Plan prepared by Ned Ilarrouh,last-dated January 1-2,2012 stamped."Approved"on January 18,2012'i A Survey ofEllen'Emery Property,dated 5-14-2013 revised 0=23r;2613,and 1.1-20-2013. DRAWINGS: • As Built Retaining Walls Sheet'101 & 1012 Dated 12-12-20,13 Dr4i1jAgq-PlanDrawiug DP-1 Dated 11-27-�2013 2 BACKGROUND: The.property-overlooks,little Peeonic Bay,facingnortheast,on a bluff approximately, 50 feet above the water and"81 feet back of the high water mark.A bulkhead at the beach ran the length of the property north to south.A retaining wall was behind the bulkhead all apparently constructed'in, 1969.Due-to a"super storm Sandy and a subsequent Nor'Easter.the existing bulkhead wall had failed causing the slope to collapse taking.dow i-the existing stair vvay'to the beach,and bulkhead. The retaining wall above failed removing the toe stability ofthe slope causing massive failure of ,the slope and erosion of the existing hillside. ,DISCUSSION: Retainine_Walis: - An'initial permit,#8049 was,obtained February 20,2013 to reconstruct the collapsed beach bulkhead,retaining wall and beach stairs.During the construction'of the initial permitted walls it was observed that the slope of the bluff had severely eroded requiring stabilization-with .additional retaining walls:A second permit was applied for and granted;#8222,to construct.an intermediate wall and,a wall approximately 34 feet below the top of the bluff,to prevent,further• erosion and,loss of ground at the top,of the slope. During the July 20,2413 inspection,the bulkhead wall at the beach had been rebuilt with a new e wall,tied back to timber pile dead men.The second timber pile, timber pile and vinyl sheet pil timber sheeting wall with batter piles and soil anchors was being constructed to stabilize the slope. Further up the bluff the erosion of the slope was.such that the existing ground slope above the wall'was approximately vertical,sloping to about a 70 degreeslope(See Photo 1).'The sand face, above the wall was seen,eroding during the site'vis t. At the top-ofthe slope,there,was an existing h6rizontal,6x6-timber retafting.wall.which was protecting the.top of slope(see photo 3).As:seea in phot6's-2 thm 4 the top of slope'has eroded to a verticaldrop_approximately 20 feet to the toe With.no slope protection afforded by'the existing 6x6 timber wall..The recommendation was made that a new timber pile and vinyl sheet pile wall be constructed approximately 10.feet back of,the existing bluff eroded-edgg. The permit allowed construction of this wall below tfid bluff. Due'to the severe'erosion of the slope,it would not,�hav=e been feasible to construct this wall at that location(Photo.#1).The near-vertical face of the slope precluded a retaining wall from being built at that location.The we of the wall would not have been anchored.Furthermore the bluff was continuing to erode and immediate stabilization was required.I was advised that the construction_ crew had-observed`-`cracks"in:the ground in front of the house'radiating,out fibra the north and south corner.These are known as tension cracks'and are indicative of movement of the slope.By placing.the wall where-it is will help to:anchor the top of the slope and'prevent future erosion.No further evidence of tension cracks were observed after the installatiort of the-sheet pile wall at the top of the.,siope on subsequent visits. Cracks in the foundation of the home were also observed. These are discussed in a separate report with recommendations dated-November 15,2013. Atthe August 26,2013 visit wall,number two had been completed and backfilled and the wall at the top of slope had also-been installed.It was noted,that between the time of the two visits significant severe erosion and evulsions had occurred at the.top-of slope completely undermining the existing timber 6x6retaining wall and,undermined the existing edge(Photo 2 and 4).The ground slopes at an almost vertical incline between the two retaining walls.;The recommendation was made that the third wall approved in the permit#.8222'should_be:installed halfway between the top of the bluff and the mid_bluff retaining wall.shown'on the approved drawings submitted 3 with the permit.The,location cif the retaining wall minimizes the unanchored distance down the slope reducing the soil wedge between the'top-of slope,and this retaining wall and reduces the slip surface of the soil(Photo#5). The slopes of the bluff have been backfilled with approximately 1800 cubic yards of sand'fill to bring the slope back to a morenatural angle of repose of'60 degrees.The lower retaining wall was buried to maintain the 60 degreeslope and prevent future,erosion.Jute matting was placed on the slope-to prevent erosion.After the new iill,settles,indigenous plantings,will be'established to protect the slope(Photo#6),such as American Beach Grass,Rugusa Rose,ahadbush;Eeach .Heath;Etc, Stairs: The original stairs-that were built in 1969 and rebuilt in 1993 and 201 l were constructed,using l'ightwei'ght materials-that were not sufficiently embedded or anchoredtothe slope.As seen after Super storm Sandy the footings were'hanging in the air,not hav%ing been properly embedded.The previous stairs were a straight�run with two small,landings.as observation areas. The,neve stairs that-were permitted were installed,using,8"timber pile supports and heavy marine grade,timbers:The,intermediate landings were located to suit the-geometry of the stairs and so they,could be anchored into the retaining walls.T6 location of the second landing,was not determined until,the.intermediate'retaining wall.had been installed.The.-establish-ed rise and run dimers"sions.of:the stair treads and the need'to;have_the bottom of the stairs land before fhe� bulkhead determined.the length,of the stair run.That and the.need to,anchor the etaining"wall to the,stair structure dictated.the location of the stairs and landings.This helps to support the stair structure(Photo;47)atidprevent it from,being,damaged<or destroyed,in a'future-storm event. The previous staifstructure that went down to the beach froin the bulkhead was built perpendicular to-the bulkhead.This-was totally destroyed due tothe tide and wave action created during Super storm Sandy,,To make the stair structure less subjective to the wind and tide it was builtparallel to the,bulkhead.This allows the structure to present a smallerprofile to the elements and is more conventional way to build such a structure-(Photo#8). To replace,the viewing area lost when the stairs were,rebuilt a 200 square.foot deck,at the top of. the stairs,is proposed-(See Plan,Sheet 101). Drahiaae• A new drainage,plan was developed to handle runoff water on.the property(See drawing DP-1).. The.property slopes from,east to west away:frorn,the bluff.To keep rundff,from infiltrating•the house a drainage swale is-recommended that,will'take runoff and lead it around to the front of the house from the south to.a drywell.at ihe-driveway with.a.grate to catch runoffcoming from the driveway.The-gutters will drain to the drywell as well.The,ground around.the house should be sloped away toward the Swale on;the east and south side of the house.On the northwest side of the house-t ground should be re-graded away'from the home. Resp c ly miffed, Seligmann rofessionaI Engineer NY 4 x F 170Y t e n u � hT t Photo No. m mea» 4th ..• � Photo No. 2 5 t � Y� >� w 4t y W' �I W { �a r «. Ak m M a f V n t V Plmto No. 5 � . , . r V Photo No. 6 7 flC F rT�J'1 l 5 r. f Photo No. 7 9M �• ','art` �. •k'� { wr � �I �•� �!. _ Y _�zk�, f 9� IIS s. ✓., A* A'! m WWI , Photo No. 8 8 �. f a Dan Seligmann, 24 Cherry Lane,Huntington, NY 1.1743, 631-423-2544 908-400-'31580 Cell 2013-002 JAN 1 7 2014 Bar of Trustees November 15,, 2Q43 E3 CLIENT: Seacoast Construdion, PO,Box 893. Sayville,NY 11782 REVERENCE: Ellen Emery Residence ence 5925 Nassau Point Southold,NY SUBJECT: Inspection of house foundation INSPECTION DATE: October 30, 2013,and November 9,2013. CY 77-OA5 ,SIJ9UCT:; 'Performed erfQrmed field",iospeetian,ofhouse'foundation and;recomrnand,tqpafirschemes,for cracking-lof foundation,elements BACKGROUNW The.,property,bVe&oks-Little.P60AIc$av,facing northeast.on a:-bluffapproximately 55 ,feet-;a-bQvqthe qr,andgtfieetback.,A;bulkhead along the beachruns the,Iength of the; property north to south.,Due:to-a super storm.Sandy and a subsequent Nor'Easter.the existing bulkhead--wall had failed causing,the slope,to collapse,,taking down,,the,existing ,staiiwqy,,to,'the1 beach and,bulkhead..The,retaining wall failed removing the�toe,stAb,ility- ,qftkq,.,slope causing,massive.failuke.,of the-.slope and erosion-oftheexisting hillside. 'The,one:story honie,is.approximately"34 feet fromthe,retaifting,vall'and 43'feet bluff.,The-home,is wood construction with,a cinderblock foundation. There is,an entrance, on-the east si_&,ofthe�ho'use,that exits,onto a small,stoop with,one;step down to grade. The basement levet is,at,,gr4de,on the northwest-side of1he"horae at the two car garage. The,north.,.side,of slope&down to�the,garage. The,south west,side,of the house slopes upi toward the mainlevel.of the house:The;property generally slopes,dbwnIo"the street. DISCUSSION: You advised that during,the reconstruction of the bulkheads and retaining walls tension cracks in,,the.soil,w6re observedat-,tlidl-nordi east,toiftdr of the hoii,se,and:`iadiated out from-the.corner. Cracks,wore-also observed pdrpendi&tilartolhe east-wall of the house, running Approximately. 30,,feete.a#from the,bouse qpprpN,imAtely.hal[fw4y along the foundation form.north to south,Y ou,adyised'thes!e� racks were approximately 1-!-2 inches: wide. At youtldquest,aft.inspection,ofthe basement wallsandfoundation was,ftia&,,to deitermifte,if any-settlingmay,have occurred.due to,the1afluie-of-the,slope and massive erosion of the bluff. The:review-of the construction indicates the foundation may have been expanded from its original'size,or it,was,constraeted of different elements. The southeastern quadrant ofsthe ,fop44#on,ig.r-aised'a-p'pr-oxim4tel.y,,2 feet:abbvejhe g44geflook.'This area is approximately 15 feet,by 30,feet and.is approximatelytialf-ofthe widthQfthe structure., The western side is raised approxim.4tely M,,,above the garage;floor.This area-coincides with a.change,iii the width 0 from. '5 transition Nhe,cinder blocks' $",'to,10"wide�'Tlu occurs approximately'3,0,feet from the south,end of the structure (See plan,.of foundation. SK-1)., There,-i'S,4.stoop outside the,,e4at5id -ofthe-home,that�wasobservedLto:bc�separated!from Im V2 the foundation wall approx, ately ".-Photo 1. 2 The=northside,of the property slopes,down from east to west to the garage level. There is a,roof drains at the corner of the garage that has a-disconnected pipe into,the ground allowing the water to flow,into the corner.,Photo 8. There are numerous cracks that were:observed'in the foundation,walls. There was one crack in the,garage floor at the northwest comer of the structure. The foundation walls show cracks at-various'locations shown on sketch SK-1. They are, summarized as follows: East Wall: • At NE corner the block'is rotated outward''and joints are cracked for 3 courses. There is'a gap between window and blocks.Photo 2 and 3'. • Approximately 19 feet south the joints are cracked for 5 courses.,Photo 4. • Approximately 32 feet south at the joint where the 10" and 8"block meet there is a vertical,crack along;the 8"blocks. Photo.5. • Approximately,5 feet north of the,southeast corner there_ are hairline cracks'for 3 to 5 courses,from the top. • Approximately 2 feet north of comer inset joint is cracked for,1 course. South Wall: • Approximately 9 feet west of the corner hairline cracks-at the joints four courses from the top. West wall: • Approximately 34feet north-the wall is cracked near,the fuel tank near the transition from the 8" cinder block to the 10"cinder block wall. Photo 6 and Photo 7. North.Wall: Approximately 8 feet east,of the corner the wall is cracked at.the window for 6 courses. COMMENTS: It would appear the;cracks along the east walls,were-caused by settlement or shifting of the soil;east of the,home,due-to the collapse of the bluff This would be confirmed by the observance ofthe,tension cracks on the:east side of the house,along the bluff. This is consistent with a,slope stability failure caused by, the erosion of the bluff. The joint where the,two size&of cinder blocks creates a weak point in the foundation walls.'See detail 1 on SK-L. This is shown by the cracks exhibited at those.locations.The extent of the footings'is unknown..I recommernd some test pits be dug to expose the footings,to see the size,and depth. This.should.be done at several points along the foundation specifically at the 10"block walls;,8"block walls at the transition between the cinder block sizes and'at the raised floor area. 3 �x for z Thesettlement at.the pprthwes� t side-of the,foundation is,likqy,Paused by,watprpooili .and-dr jnto�the comer,oftheifoundation,at the,garage.door undermining ng the footing. The.bluffhas.been stabilized.,so no further erosion is expected.,The extent of the soil, stability, cannot be determined,-'but:if-thefoundAtion,was,undelftnined differential settlement,could cause.potentialadditiond settlement,over time. To pipyphtposgible,dontihae&settleftidit'and cracking,ofthe-f6 u.n-dation Lwould recommend undemi -thp�,fbundation,al nethenorth md �rjni4g, and-east-wait. The west wall north;of the:transition,between thet"and I0'block at,the fuel:tank should also`be underpinned. Helfcal-,pi-lesi sNuld be used,,since they,-can.'bdihstalldd Withm-iiniffu,mAmpact to the, ,foundat I iom,Thev can beinsWed inside the,basement..1,would recommend using°a Mififinum,10" 1,2",doubleflight,--b:elix,at,,,5,foot spacing withadeveloped-capaclty of 10 ,tons per pile.The minimum depth.should,be,l5feet below the foundation: A foundation !bracket' boltedto,'theBbo 'fing should'be used'.The brackets,ghoul'id,"be,,Pyploadoditotransfer the'loadfrom the,foundation to, pile.,Carey should be,taken in,the.instalhtfionzt-,the Iocation whereAhe,basement floor-steps,up,. The;6indbf'bl6ck W611s at the north-cFaist,corner should,be removed and resetA recommend.r,eblacingthd`basement:window since it is not in good condificin and has separated,from#ie_cigder-'block.,Care shoulolibe taken not to fornovo more than,two, blocks at a,time.orprovide'temporary'sup'support the wooden plate pQ .. above., The cracks along the-.fomdation-canberepaired,,in several ways.The,s* 'testmethod IMP Would,betq sdafthehaifline,,cracks,with'aft,injectable epoxy sealer suitable for masonry W411s.from both sides. Larger cracks scan be-repaired by removing the.mortar and replacing,thel mortarjpints. Since the:bluff has been istabilized itis�unlikeily the stoop will;settle firiher. One or two tow,capacity helical piles;can be installed if needed: A new 4rai'Aagp scheme should'be developed,,for-the property.-The water the back yard shoul4be4irected towardthe street. using&Vrench drain;and,swale Vith;piping;to a di wdllJnthe,4dVew4yi All of , should'be�connected to,,the ol�*a,ge'system as well., Resp c IM y8lub 'itted, eligrriann essiona,[,Engineer NY 4. P 17711 PHOTOS: . I ti r A14 Photo I y F d Ile e `_ It � � �,,.-� /�'• ;..s err �,.� : .• ��., J ��C F lTfh z Photo f � r ? , rt ry � � q t. 1 v F � �u V Z Photo 3 t rV. t I �T q 6 � H . � G '1 r � �au9as �� r •�' r r" y�r.'�j�•.�eq. CF + 9 3 Wr i,r Photo 6 w ds tt' p �� 4W x Z.. Photo 7 8 a fi , r� tP Ido IM t ti ��..ti..., a.. f W , Photo 8 9 Fa TOWN'OF SOUTHOLD Cot. BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE • SOUTHOLD, NY JAN 1 7 2014 BUILDING PERMIT ar Trus ee (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 38536 Date: 11/27/2013 Permission is hereby granted to: Emery Ellen F 1999 Rev Tr 121 Somerset Ave Garden City, NY 11530 To: Foundation repairs as applied for. At premises located at: 5925 Nassau Point Rd, Cutchogue SCTM #473889 Sec/Block/Lot# 111.43-6 Pursuant to application dated 11/25/2013 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 5/29/2015. Fees: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING-ADDITION OR ALTERATION $200.00 CO -ALTERATION TO DWELLING $50.00 ---� Total: $250.00 1 uiIdi s ector SEACOAST CONSTRUCTIO P.O. Box 893 Sayville, NY 11782 JA N 1 7 2014 www.seacoastdocks.com Wso it1'.6id?o'V,;- B and of Trustee Christopher M. Gentry Phone (631) 472-7616 Supervisor Fax (631) 472-7618 November 23, 2013 PROPOSAL Ms. Ellen F.Emery 5925 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 (516)746-4038 FOUNDATION UNDERPINNING Upon inspection of dwelling, it was observed that there is soil shifting underneath foundation of house. Several areas of foundation on East side have shifting blocks and cracks. The Northeast comer of basement has rotation leaning of upper wall(1/2"out of plumb). West wall has shifting cracks. SCOPE OF WORK Saw cut and.remove concrete in basement areas. Excavate areas.Install Helical Piles. Install new concrete. Install.Meel plating in Northeast comer. CONSTRUCTION: "HELICAL PILES" Twenty Two 1 %2"x 10"x 12"x 21'-26'. Helical Piles will be installed along walls of dwelling. Foundation brackets will be installed at top of Helical Piles to pre load foundation bearing to pile bearing. Developed capacity of 10 tons per pile. CONSTRUCTION: "FAILING CONCRETE BLOCKS" Northeast comer of dwelling will be raised. Cinder blocks will be reset,repointed. Basement window area will be rebuilt. Window will be replaced. Raising of dwelling will be done in two lift points,with hydraulically operated system. A 24"x 24"x 36"x 5/16" steel plate will be installed on inside 90 degree corner. CONSTRUCTION: "CRACK REPAIR" Middle of East wall was shifting. Repair in this area will be done by repointing and sealing cracked areas. Larger shifting cracks will be grinded out and filled with hydraulic cement. CONSTRUCTION: "STOOP UNDERPINNING" Two 10 ton Helical Piles will be installed under offshore end of stoop.Area will be jack loaded. CONSTRUCTION: " CONCRETE INSTALLATION" Saw cut areas will be plate tamped and filled with fiber reinforced concrete,4000 PSI. Upon completion of helical installation. CONSTRUCTION: "BLOCK WALL" Interior block walls will be etched and sealed with waterproofing. NOTE: This proposal includes New York State stamped Engineers Plans. NOTE: This proposal includes full Town and State Permits. g E, f s — F f t; - i t I Dan Seligmann, PE 24 Cherry Lane, Huntington, NY 11743 631-423-2544 908-400-3580 Cell 2013-002 November 11, 2013 NO 12 2013 CLIENT: Seacoast Construction PO Box 893 Boar "k''wk— Sayville,NY 11782 REFERENCE: Ellen Emery Residence 5925 Nassau Point Southold,NY SUBJECT: Inspection of house foundation INSPECTION DATE: October 30, 2013 and November 9, 2013 1 SUBJECT: Performed field inspection of house foundation and recommend repair schemes for cracking of foundation elements BACKGROUND: The property overlooks Little Peconic Bay facing northeast on a bluff approximately 55 feet above the water and 81 feet back. A bulkhead along the beach runs the length of the property north to south.Due to a super storm Sandy and a subsequent Nor'Easter the existing bulkhead wall had failed causing the slope to collapse taking down the existing stairway to the beach and bulkhead.The retaining wall failed removing the toe stability of the slope causing massive failure of the slope and erosion of the existing hillside. The one story home is approximately 34 feet from the retaining wall and 43 feet from the bluff. The home is wood construction with a cinderblock foundation. There is an entrance on the east side of the house that exits onto a small stoop with one step down to grade. The basement level is at grade on the northwest side of the home at the two car garage. The north side of the house slopes down to the garage. The south west side of the house slopes up toward the main level of the house.The property generally slopes down to the street. DISCUSSION: You advised that during the reconstruction of the bulkheads and retaining walls tension cracks in the soil were observed at the north east corner of the house and radiated out from the corner.Cracks were also observed perpendicular to the east wall of the house running approximately 30 feet east from the house approximately halfway along the foundation form north to south.You advised these cracks were approximately 1-2 inches wide. At your request an inspection of the basement walls and foundation,was made to determine if any settling may have occurred due to the failure of the slope and massive erosion of the bluff. The review of the construction indicates the foundation may have been expanded from its original size or it was constructed of different elements.The southeastern quadrant of the foundation is raised approximately 2 feet above the garage floor.This area is approximately 15 feet by 30 feet and is approximately half of the width of the structure. The western side is raised approximately 14"above the garage floor. This area coincides with a change in the width of the cinder blocks from 8"to 10"wide. This transition occurs approximately 30 feet from the south end of the structure(See plan of foundation SK-1). There is a stoop outside the east side of the home that was observed to be separated from the foundation wall approximately V2".Photo 1. 2 The north side of the property slopes down from east to west to the garage level. There is a roof drain at the corner of the garage that has a disconnected pipe into the ground allowing the water to flow into the corner. Photo 8. There are numerous cracks that were observed in the foundation walls.There was one crack in the garage floor at the northwest corner of the structure. The foundation walls show cracks at various locations shown on sketch SK-1.They are summarized as follows: East Wall: • At NE corner the block is rotated outward and joints are cracked for 3 courses. There is a gap between window and blocks. Photo 2 and 3. • Approximately 19 feet south the joints are cracked for 5 courses. Photo 4. • Approximately 32 feet south at the joint where the 10"and 8"block meet there is a vertical crack along the 8"blocks. Photo 5. • Approximately 5 feet north of the southeast corner there are hairline cracks for 3 to 5 courses from the top. • Approximately 2 feet north of corner inset joint is cracked for 1 course. South Wall: • Approximately 9 feet west of the corner hairline cracks at the joints four courses from the top. West wall: • Approximately 34 feet north the wall is cracked near the fuel tank near the transition from the 8"cinder block to the 10"cinder block wall. Photo 6 and Photo 7. North Wall: • Approximately 8 feet east of the corner the wall is cracked at the window for 6 courses. COMMENTS: It would appear the cracks along the east walls were caused by settlement or shifting of the soil east of the home due to the collapse of the bluff.This would be confirmed by the observance of the tension cracks on the east side of the house along the bluff. This is consistent with a slope stability failure caused by the erosion of the bluff. The joint where the two sizes of cinder blocks creates a weak point in the foundation walls. See detail 1 on SK-1. This is shown by the cracks exhibited at those locations.The extent of the footings is unknown. I recommend some test pits be dug to expose the footings to see the size and depth.This should be done at several points along the foundation specifically at the 10"block walls; 8"block walls at the transition between the cinder block sizes and at the raised floor area. 3 The settlement at the northwest side of the foundation is likely caused by water pooling and draining into the corner of the foundation at the garage door undermining the footing. The bluff has been stabilized so no further erosion is expected. The extent of the soil stability cannot be determined but if the foundation was undermined differential settlement could cause potential additional settlement over time. To prevent possible continued settlement and cracking of the foundation I would recommend underpinning the foundation along the north and east wall.The west wall north of the transition between the 8"and 10 block at the fuel tank should also be underpinned. Helical piles should be used since they can be installed with minimum impact to the foundation. They can be installed inside the basement. I would recommend using a minimum 10"-12"double flight helix at 5 foot spacing with a developed capacity of 10 tons per pile. The minimum depth should be 15 feet below the foundation. A foundation bracket bolted to the footing should be used.The brackets should be preloaded to transfer the load from the foundation to the pile. Care should be taken in the installation at the location where the basement floor steps up. The cinder block walls at the north east corner should be removed and reset. I recommend replacing the basement window since it is not in good condition and has separated from the cinder block. Care should be taken not to remove more than two blocks at a time or provide temporary support from the wooden sill plate above. The cracks along the foundation can be repaired in several ways.The simplest method would be to seal the hairline cracks with an injectable epoxy sealer suitable for masonry walls from both sides. Larger cracks can be repaired by removing the mortar and replacing the mortar joints. Since the bluff has been stabilized it is unlikely the stoop will settle further. One or two low capacity helical piles can be installed if needed. A new drainage scheme should be developed for the property.The water from the back yard should be directed toward the street using a French drain and swale with piping to a drywell in the driveway. All of the gutter downspouts should be connected to the drainage system as well. ?Seligma Submitted, nn Professional Engineer NY 4 PHOTOS: Photo 1 � A 1-7 h � 4' (5; b u Cy F i F s 5 Photo 2 Photo 3 6 Photo 4 Ir MIR, WA F. b y e M 5� Photo 5 7 1 � 1 �x 20 Photo 6 tww� pr,ep. i_' Ix Tl F, SaN Tek, sa�� ts6S as.,' RIM ��r Photo a 9 1011 CMU 611 CMU 64'41" p o0 0 I Ac bead Ibl.n ay. I' cra3�.� .,rod's t'M-�c FYLs '.ais ae Mcg cores 3-5 cvses �'-)n �• 5�a.'scc II e�t.w i fn 14'2" t•C" crack at Jest kp Mai, IJ'A.(•w• A El 11 i L J 5ectlai A-A 78-- 0 0 o I" o o Sca'e 4"-1,0" G,rkz at Joints �'�" darks atys+ 10" I/4"GadYfbr L J 1 " 2' 6 carxs ��•:�� '�,n Secbcn(4-r3 see v•r'.,'p'� 65'-II" 2' PI-an View Scale I/8"-I'-O" 5ecticn C-C r' Foundation Ulan Hen amen{ pe5idence 5925 Nassau Pont pd Cutchoque, NY 11935 11-11-13 5K-1 n5e ^}I °' f Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust 5925 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue SCTM# 111-13-6 11/6/13 Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust 925 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue CTM#111-13-6 11/6/13 lam. q'. IP *i • - w .I � �y 1� 'Qr 'r Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust 5925 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue CTM##111-13-6 S 11/6/13 I *. t t� t A �. ..a._ AA "� �, tit ilii t�acitf I� t �t 20. _ .rt.�s:.. a 1�/K•`` r, , Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust �� 925 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue �� r„ ►�- y^* CTM# 111-13-6 _ •i�: '"'�`~��' ' # 11/6/13 rr Emery i 11/2013 s 1 Waft Emery 11/2013 r ; i K 1 F 0 James F King,President P O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President y� Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen y - Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer u, ��, Fax(631)765-6641 Michael J Domino G Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: �' .)-o /3 Field Inspection for ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST to determine if any structures have been constructed out of compliance or constructed without a permit. Located: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 111-13-6 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment Administrative_Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: - (6 x ld G �-/� "X ✓y3r Conditions: Pres ere: J. Kin /B. Ghosio /D. Bergen, v71t, . redemeyer�Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled ou=thefield Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Town of Southold Town of Southold -A - 2704, Suffolk County,-NY A_ 2705 Suffolk County, NY The People of the State•of New,York,vs. The People Of the State of New York V$. LAST NAME(DEFENDANT) /J ,e!�� FIRST NAME - "MIDDLE INITIAL -LASTE(DE ANT) (��•r�inJ ,y � s�-I 1 CJ� I� •FIRST NAME MIDDLE INITIAL / STREET ADDRESS 'APT NO ,STREET ADDRESS �� APT.NO, C 13 (ji9-5 RY SIM;- ZIP' 2 � ) t �r� /�Jam/ / ] ;-ry 3 7-CITY iy rlL:� S!it1dV nP - �I Vt�.LL/ Y / • C Ci (A y LICEN OR REGISTRATION NUMBER CENSE OR REGISTRATION NUMBER, _ _ 'L O _ _ - STATE, TYPE 5FLICENSE DATE EXPIRES SEX DATE OF BIRTH OPERATOR ff-.TA-- =THE SEX DATE OF BIRTH r I - '- - MONTH DA YEAR OWNS VEHICLE OPERATOR /V - P _ •-7 '� P, 95 OYES ❑NO I MONTH ,Di1Yj 'OWNS= THE OPERATOR OR REGIS RED OWNER OF VEHICLE DESCRIBED BELOW OPERATOR OR REGISTERED OWNER OF VEHICLE DESCRIBED BELOW ❑YES ❑NO ' PLATE NO DATE EXPIRES PLATE NO. -- _- - -- - DATE EXPIRES - e STATE PLATE TPE- _ AJ3 STATE_' _ ❑N.Y. ❑'N J ❑N.Y ❑N J ❑ ❑PASS ❑COMM ❑ , _ '� �.O NY ❑NJ ❑NY ❑NJ ❑ PLATE TYPE.1._ ❑PASS ❑COMM ❑y___- J VEHICLE MAKE ❑ DODGE ,) VEHICLE MAKE ❑-- 'BUICK ❑' - CHEV '- ❑ -- CADILLAC -- ❑ PONTIAC ❑ DODGE❑ BUICK ❑- CHEV •❑ CADILLAC ❑ FORD ❑ OLDS ❑ PLYM ❑ FORD ❑ PONTIAC-❑ OLDS ❑ PLYM r ❑' TOYOTA ❑ VOLKSOCT 3 0 ❑ TOYOTA ,❑ VOLKS f BODY ❑ 2DR ❑ 4DR ❑ BUS ❑ MCY ❑ SWBODY ❑ 2DR ❑ 4 DR ❑ BUS ❑ MCY TYPE ❑ TRUCK O TRAILER- -- ❑-VAN__ r-TYPE - ❑ SW_ ❑ TRUCK -,❑ TRAILER- ❑ VAN ❑ - - - VIN NUMBER -VINN _ _a d f Tn(s ; - THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS CHARGED AS FOLLOWS THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS CHARGED AS FOLLOWS"- I PLAQE OF OCCURRENCE PLA OF OCCUgRENCE Aq _- / - ' -- - S rLl J ,,�`/f lr,��f�iJ✓ /^ PCT i DATE OF 6F1jFENSE AM - ,TIME f-PM q7Y,TOWN,VILLAGE,OR HAMLET SUFFOLK COUNTY NY DATE OF OFFENSE. AM %ME�iPM CITY SOWN,VI GE,OR HAMLET . SUFFOLK COUNTY NY I� '� ❑ IV, �' 6 7 Q IM O a L% ❑ '8/ D J _ IN VIOLATION OF SECTION SUED OFTHE❑VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK IN VIOLATION OFSECTION- SUED OF TCLE HE❑VEHIAND TRAFFIC LAW OF THE STATE OF,NEW YORK ETHER(SPECIFY) _ /e ❑,O S ❑COM ❑BUS ❑HAZ �'THER(SPECIFY) ,� + Jn�(f ❑O S ❑COM ❑BUS ❑HAZ 7S,... • - �2� DEF VEH MAT 27� P\Q �-Jl.� GLS DEF VEH MAT ❑ SPEEDING O ER OFFENSE - - ❑ SPEEDINGER OFFENS MPH IN A "MPH ZONE ✓� MISDEMEANOR❑ MPH INA - .MPH ZONE MISDEMEANOR❑ - - - - FACTUAL PART(NOT,FOR TVB) 4 FACTUAL PART(NOT FOR TVB) �- ,�' THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT DID ON THE STATED_D TE,TIME AND PLACE THEABOVE NAME DEFENDAI DID O THE STATED DATE,TIME AND PLA 7j(�1�J� 9_ evr►e� The Foreg�orJ}9 s based on(Personal knowledge) ❑�+ ^� t r,�r n nn o me big .+..w.mdrpa�{eyof Tire Faregamg s bas don(p/e'rsonal knowledge) me n belief),Ne so _ f �La� .dated 10 13 dated ty 3! PARKING SCHEDULED FINES -CONTACT COURT 11PARKING SCHEDULED FINE$- CONTACT COURT❑ I THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AT THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AT - I 'SOUTHOLD TOWN JUSTICE COURT,53095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN JUSTICE COURT,53095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 -DATE OFAPPEARANCE(NOT FOR TVB) DATE OF APPC4RANCE(NOT FOR TVII) ON ON i/7 w J g AT ®V, f 9, W�3 AT rOp, AM - _ FALSE STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE PUNSHA13LE ASA CLASS AMISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210 45 OF THE P LN Y S FALSE STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLEAS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 21045 OF THEP LN Y S COMPLAINANT DATE COMPLAINANT �- - DATE I®FZ L ///J �// BADGE#O t IN,_ I / I ` io •� - �/ , ; ,-r a /// --- — n, r •*. i cif � _ // "�`Yf _ .. � . ` 14 ,� �� • • _� 1 -• � -z ,,.eat'' a F - _ � Y 1, � • , a J 4 y J �. t 9 �:. F n 1C t r+ y r ■ UL- t IF AdbbZ 41 ir •l.f �"Si+*� _fix `` - - 'y a .,t • +5. t . r .r .00 14, All +� '4L �'Lay� Y R 4�`fir�i yr.��16,�M!•.-rte, :�f� �� 1..:- � , � , 'Tarte 0, �' 1 r Fy1 1 .ter -Oka �.�► .?. r' ..+' < � y +�►. Ile 40. its Ar _ � i �� s '�'�,,►'•` '�.". � r� ; Y" 4 � '.1',f��Yeti g - ,° �+ ��'� f e�� "••'g .�`';�., � / '!'� � '1� r � � ,'✓'-, � ��• ` ,t�' � • � ° "fly � ' '" .�` I I f • _ �' q q fir• ,�_.,". �' -' � r 1 - � , � 1 , .C, , s � �_ ' i. _ 1 � �.. I— � � 11 _ ' � �. y �� \� , i 1-,ti -y i'�a _� �' -K,' �� \ � `w \ `�\ .� ��` !? �� !�> � 1 \\i � �\ \'\�� J r � �f �� .• � ��: �` �, � A� 4`y\+ � ` �`` _ � � �, �, �� ti� � �� 1 __ o� � `� . , �. - . �, �.� _: � t � � �� . �� `�. � �� `� . o '� �� •, �, � �.. `�. '� � � '"` .: � 1 _ �, ._ ��, f 1 BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES � SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 8222 DATE:JUNE 19,2013 ISSUED TO: ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST t PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD,CUTCHOGUE r SCTM# 111-13-6 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees'adopted at the meeting held on June 19,2913,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Ellen F.Emery 1999 Revocable Trust and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following. Wetland Permit to construct a t98' upper retaining wall with two(2) 1.3' ` returns using vinyl sheathing; construct a1981 mid-bluff wood retaining wall with two (2)13' returns; add clean fill to re-establish the entire bluff area as needed; construct a platform at top of bluff leading to 4' wide bluff stairs and a 101x10' observation platform along the mid-bluff retaining wall; re-vegetate all disturbed bluff areas using native plantings; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Seacoast Construction Inc.,received on May 28,2013 and stamped approved on June 19,2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. - --- ------ ---- ------- - --- - - ----- -- _ R . r ; .� .rrr '�r�..� ,a ..a �a;�r�a w��e•lt•a•;!•�5.�:��.'�'!,'/'` ��Qi� tt :f�itti �� ttft�t�tttt ��1�� t�391�t�t� t..� ttttL�Gj �itttttt��t,t 'tta�St�a=isri�a' ��trttr«`tt��tt,r,�: tt,t•t�ttt�:�tt�.tt'�tlt�t'��t,t.0\�-tt tttt�� t tt■t tttttf�l . ..mm no ttt;tllt it��,wr�■°�rr�� .tt;�ttt��,lt�tt tttlllltt't'•`��%�i%■flit .tttt�t.tl�- t"�.t :�tts��■tt�_:�.�f�r,:�t�ft ��ttt��t tr '40atrs:"� 'tr ' ii /Cry ■tsoon i■ttG��i .�i�tt�t■att��tt��1/tt�■ tw ■tt�llt"'"'tttw nrr:_:�n��ft�r��t�.��tt�,. tall■IltM�IIIIII,l��ft��<t�11111ttttttif� t■ ttttll■. ■tt�I 'tml.KIM + utLrlt 1211mmIl;mt t tt�l1I��t_;,�t ttEt�t��tiitttttl.11ltt ■t tllt �i�■t��t� ,...u.��,a!!�It�tttllItttt ►ttt►/�,l17�l�t�t■t tttEti��.��G��ft�tt !1 r_ VA�rz !mllm_=,_ , , tr. t"9•r0•I aa0Waa04'amt �t`i��`t!l ::wtt t�■ttttttt a►�t�tt ttttl�tt RNMENUMMUMEN,tNEWSMEN ■tttiltE O/N�t'!.tt�t��ttttr ttr ��l�"i�-.'J'L.�'r-•�'ii.�il:��'ttt�ta;t��l�!3f .�t ■ ■�1t!lw�tttttt.ttt■tt��tttIoollum t t�1lt:ttttttawtttt ttttttti'��tt tttBOSSEtt�ttt�t��tt��I��t`1ltttt ttt��lttt��t -tltt tt��t�!/■ �'�tt■ttt 't�;t.�t.��t�"�•J1'��'•�•t'!iL..`_':rZ�' ' j.i t•tt �•tt•t,�"t, ■�ttttt't�� l,t�t�i`1_t.t'tl1� •!".tt:! .. , �ii�■ii�iiii:�i�i�im HERMAR MIGmoll !■ MORE I iii■i��if0 iis��i�iiii�_�� ►fit►NVIN k 01%kl\ .4• NI UM NEWS M;iE E'sm� amm:i;l.lm�sms'n,o .iitsr MEMSEEME EMEMSERESURRAIIIA UIRSERMIN FA REMEMBER ■�i��i�iii�ri his 1�:��i / RAMMUiMI ISIRRE KIN 00MMEMEMIRMERIMUSIMSEM ,�+!iMEMi,iiiii A ■ii■� il�,i.ir,�ii /. it��.�i.ii��iif��■ ■iRMUMiii ,RE0woMEMIKERREUMM RES /,5 r r!�rr►!� :�,�t�l� MME ISffMIt lREVISION��«�� t�■�t�■llsomlr■ERRUMM- MESMERIZE REEMEM SEEMS Mal MEN SMUMMUMMEMMUSE f .J lam;" Rl:s! 1 ►�ll��!!MOMEEMEMENEl��!!!■ ■ � :�r:.:AWI!!!!!!llmlff!!!!lluMUSEUM 2 ll! din lll!!!ommuss!!!. NO ANSWAIR LI MEMO Masi MR I,! MEN RICA FAM502 0 M !!MEN.-R- --.1 !! ■! !!�!!!! =!!! 0o 1 MEN!!!!K!!■HOUR N!HOUR MEMO EIMMMEII !!! !!!!!!!u!ual ! t��%!!!!!!�!!! ■!!!!!!a!!!!K!!l! MONSOON ROME !!!!!#!!!!l!!!lliEll «!lii !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!#!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!�!!! ■ REZONEll!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!■ !t#!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!loll!! !!!n!!#!!l l lam!!!man unman. =a lelllllllown -..ME MR llll !!!!!!!!�:!! !!!!!!!!!_!!! !!!!n!!!s - MINE ! !MEMO l!!!!!!!l!!!!!ll!!!!!!! SURVEY OF LOT 41 'MAP OF PPOP05ED 5UBDIVI510N 5ECTION A NA55AU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES INC N 51TUATED ON NASSAU POINT,SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK,SURVEYED BY WALLACE H HAL5EY,C E SOUTHAMPTON,NEW YORK JUNE 1919' AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUFFOLK COUNTY ON 10.4-19 AS MAP NO 745 E Q E I V E D w E SITUATE: CUTCHOGUE I01L^'Jl`lIJ M D TOWN: 5OUTHOLD 2 8 2013 S SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY MAY 5URVEYED 05-14-2013 j SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX# NhDld T � 1000- I I I - 13-6 `O� �0 T CERTIFIED TO: 1� 1 1 ELLEN EMERY '� { PROPERTY ADDRESS30�} tE9' i1 bFco } 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD 'Coss �6I— CD CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 �& PROPE�U� 'al 260 = tt� 6 Z Jl,3CA ,... O �µ �\ U 0.6 1 \ � s�ooP 1 h V. i zo .a �- � LAWN O I 1 i F�AMr EAT O N K 11 +I NOER �ItP W 5 66 3 - 0 Zo.z 1 224°�O ---�`.— — ` ~ I 3 � \ i - 1 t - i O ' AsR ff DPJVEWAY O � l I, ilk i �1 57803612ottw 1 z l = Loi a2 I NOTES. ® MONUMENT FOUND WOOD FENCE JOHN C. E H LE RS LAND SURVEYOR - CIAIN LINK FENCE Area =30,370 Sq Ft Area =0 6974 Acres 6 EAST MAIN STREET 14.Y.5 LIC NO 50202 GRAPHIC SCALE I"= 30' ° RIVERHEAD, N.Y 1190! 369-8288 Fax 369 8287 y SON 2 -r--�dF� StD V 1+1 I� e �BRWAL ar ao longlslandland5urveyor.com Calvo s ,.,..,,,,..,,,,,,. ..w........,. 1 i BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK I PERMIT NO.8049 DATE: FEBRUARY 20,2013 i ISSUED TO: ELLEN F. EMERY I PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD,CUTCHOGUE SCTM# 111-13-6 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on February 20,2013,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Lark&Folts or authorized waiver of Town Board and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to replace 100' of failed bulkhead with two 8' returns; replace 100' of failed retaining wall; and replace beach access stairs, all destroyed by Hurricane Sandy; with the condition that a spring inspection of buffer areas be completed to ensure a natural buffer; and as depicted on the project plan prepared by j Seacoast Construction, last dated on February 12,2013 and stamped approved on February 20, 2013. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. i to �► y�1►pl � �ao� I i ? 1\rr / rvrK3@.ruYviJvJ.n.i�GS.J3r[fAV.(.(oir Yvtie•A.•5[Yur+/ lr.a'iaFit+i,ur"VSAl'.Y 7'"•iiJ5 Z.A+fiV 1)iid TLffi.L9•.iYS'R�Wc�ifo%dW!xki.V.Y+ T- —•• � � //�/�y�,'y � rXtiY•SL.�J.n.w.i 2'uTx7G65YF, {� �i , r awoto�6tam,rat 1 m MEN I JEFA SOME NOR - �!�� • A oom k a- m-niii r -r s . '% i A in NO OMEN trip Sof. i 1 � � i EMINFAZIFISSIN 0Re.6,1 1i m f Allooks 9 • r -r i MmEnt MINOR EONS VPJI i A I I PAN r I f � - i C T' '+'i 'V p' "iii ii" ti iOr'. �' 'i7f — ei i. oo•'°-`�% _ ,`�\11 . •f I r'':. - .,;�1 f 9 �. - 1/'y _ -•� 1 %%°" __'y,� 1 �.�� _ -:V' ••i°I%�ip. BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEWYORK l 3 t PERMIT NO. 7706 DATE: JANUARY 18, 2012, ISSUED TO: ELLEN F. EMERY ��- - PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5925 NASSAU POINT ROAD, CUTCHOGUE L: SCTM# 111-13-6 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code pf the Town of Southold and in _ accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on January 18,2012,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250:00 paid by Ellen F.Emery and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the f ti following: •�i;; Wetland Permit to con struct'a2 square foot observation platform in =`' conjunction with the existing stairway system;,and as depicted on the site plan + prepared by Ned Harroun, last dated January 12, 2012, and stamped approved on ° January 18, 2012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes•its-Corporate Seal to be affixed, r` and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. J h•a '��i°I � V4'Y a 'w .. Go - t Dave Bergen — Abstained 4� J01 fJ 'h `� .�-ir,,' ��t �::� % .�'i�l"� � L�• lir%. .`'� =� S I �' _ (.�-� y� z ��,1II t"� J• s� �I �,. `. �^'.�� f'R;i <�' II �=� III � '�\f it :-b% rrrari�rn� /2I -v I7�� (1' ■dam rifn ll� 5111 Will, �` _ j � �� `; ►' ��_1�1111Iill�ll!l�lili�ill�{Il�llllllhl�� • r� ; :` � •. I:::I:::;ir:i�i�riuriraiii:rii� r ( , { i+.v •.rlr-��7• 'tom AM A r I• � c ` � � �, �� ar •. I v ► _ ` f c •� � i�{ _�;= 7iiii'is'f"�. �',� __�Fp,.• ,gti1-yr.-~, ,�•"_'�•4•. _-.�,��•�•..-r",. –�..".'i1°1•i'Y r- ..�1°0°/°/°°y�•„ + .� •X111++ ''V 1 °J •.�`�1 r ' /••�,. � p°%,..•s_ BOARD,OF-SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUS'T'EES SCS TTHOLDNEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7652 DATE: SEPTEMBER 21,2011 ++.•: g J LT• ISSUED TO: ELLEN,F. EMERY; � ►v off. PROPERTY ADDRESS: -5925 NASSAU-POINTAGAD; CUT ROGUE 1 f'` "10 SCTM# 111-13-6 Y - 7. 77 , .f, 2' � 11,x•, ,1111°/ .. , 'r a i , ) .� � i ' .� /°//°°• �: Pursuant-�o the,provisions of Cktapter,2,75;o£.the Town Code of-tho Town of So�zthold and in„ - 111,9: x= accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on Seol{einbec'21',20111, and inconsideration of application fee in the sum of$500.00 paid by Ellen F.Emery and subject to tke Terms 3 nCi+'+ and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the _ following: _ „:•< Wetland•Permit to repair andfeotace existing stairs and platfd'riii iri'tlte same /1 location;,trim;aad remove doad,,and over ro{7yn vines and non-native,vegetation�,on 1119` k bluff; build terracing and install erosion control mats ai top of the bluff;;replant"bluff :it11 '%r '•-. with native plant material; replace the existing fence along the top of a bluff; aied for a = u ed322sqto ca.re feet;flagpole;,with the eo ditlonsitatxhe platorm•s xe f the use of non-treated lumber on the decking;-the4ence is,mttv<ed hgek tQ;tl o-f iggpole; 'zw the area between the fence and the top of bluff is to remain un-mowed and left in its natt�crit o�nd��ii�n;acid"a`s"d'e01et6dJft t1i`esiWplan prepared�by.Ned Harrdiin;rldceived on ce'z ii `r 29;`20 1; rid st iipei app 61 ed3oii-January,°it;201 .•• , i y1t •s'^• •}.e t 4.•r IN VdYTI�iE 'V�'HLIt (b)?;fli ' 'lards ijf i fistees°liereby causes'itsCtirdrate Sdal-to lie"affixed, - and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board'as of tltis'date - iI a- 14.1 A10 •�,,°•v 1i �` Dave Ber en — Recused ..:•° + L.. w;,^ ''/ 1 �� •e •,��4/ 1,• '" .w,,l +•11,•.`4 •41 IIN9�:. . r APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES -TOWN OF SOUTHOLD F LL E EMERY ,59a,5MASSA L pad .CUTCHOGUE Ns Y w 935 JRAt` D EC 2 9 2011 E , F U-S E fit r-- �+u2�Ci Of 1f;.'St2f-;' v , i t � �_ o� 4 '1A�Toteq CteANk� _.m R tom, US heM CM erp_We&"raewe- o ed P66h ,X &-rte 071 o ��%W �10 �r . nb �vW • � �•s 84 doles dua ,�r Axa reptPIC, e (reduce �ecK - t mss' ri L�pte PPLr_rPAREDV 7 led WaRWLIjV 5CAteYyY ,' • e , IVi 6 Ry 0 em a E 72 y �a r�;1 m an tgT9 pm kq l to Nil 1 l y i f -PIC F l 1..., E- I 3 7 A4 b A C BOUom ", 70 :;;-�vm :1 UP Z' 'R ul K N odr4- HIGH WATT LINE -80 LoW WATER LME TD L JAN - 6 2012 r m eL �h o a ue New Y9k 'E7Ltt. J21� Y + a 4g`i CLb Spk, L 1 ��1 c2�Gf- � l r Vs 5p,�I��s 14 F R p r It sere � 1 r A4 Kz g � rKe r Zo lie JAN - 6 2012 F � 1 x`21 �e 7W �. Z� � :��. /' ^gyp c4ln edl Sic ape j � � tid rd , 1 I ' r Trc4p �a - 4 K ! �.r �r:�..',-,•'d4_�.'. dr`� jm,�a-" `Y:•4r y ,��'""�q�."� e,n��_� �y g; Southold Town Trustees � 3 '• �� ' SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ' r, q, PERMIT NO Ili 13—� DATE ISSUED TA1erkc-=.......E.r1 .y r / Y Pursuant } :a, �'�• o the provisions of Chapter b15 of the Laws of I f the State of New York, 1893; ,and Chap}er 404 of the LawsState of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND•PUBLIC LANDS and the �4m REMOVAL: OF SANU,' GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM �A = f LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting ;,• held on s5' ill' 19... ... a in - .., d n considerafion of the sum of $._.�� f--paid by of ......... ... . .............. .......:. .. .... ..... . N. Y. and subj.... .... .. ...... :. Iect to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, �aA of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and-permits the following: r p Y¢ �' x a, G9L i 5 a1r►/� leu\4h4,r��1 C�kL')Vn 1144 t� s� 4+ �W© 1�3 •�On RaL�S ACX-2�.��u S8 �~y ��n� `��VC+r'1 I �p 1" �.�. ` dry ��:. �A V IJV\�1�. � �w •� HY• , all in-accordance with the de}ailed specifications as presented in the originating application. "b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here-by ''�• - causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and theseresents to k� ' • a be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. f.., . ....... ........ . «r ...................................................................._............... Trustees ,t •�-°�''.""„"r�'e'S��"'ti-' '� ''rtw.�,:.��.-�a;!..+a+. �r—'�•'r.'--�t"iv-Aa7, •.s`::r�'.tp�,�`.:'�- +w•:w�ao- b^ J t'S ti{ n; i�,Yt•��=•� �z°4��,1y`a�'i.c"� ��vti:•^., ,� �`:� �'j��jj N may f �' •';ti>,•� S� '9"'�,•��, :1 �� `r, .k�,i:,�lY C.J,\'" th'yIW� � � :Y,'r/.R�m` iti<'CS.`..`l�'t'''�•`•- k•1 �IIRV OUT—., 112498 1221- Tlei O M2— ------- 1-47 k1e) 07 2� g fn 0pE A Q 4 0 2 4 3NO 7 RQ 0 2 ---------- • 4 c) ------- --- Im, 44M M .2r 14 31 14 WETA Ptj 90 UNE LWE ?9 43 qD It SOUTHOLD CTO-0 ETax Somm Agency A LARK& FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 Tele.No.(631)734-6807 RICHARD F.LARK Fax No. (631)734-5651 MARY LOU FOLTS E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com May 8, 2014 Southold Board of Town Trustees MAY m 9 2014 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 5oi,tlioidyvri� e RE: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) SCTM #1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Dear Sirs : In connection with the above application, I am enclosing a copy of the landscape plan prepared by Polly L. Weigand of the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District, dated March 31 2014 . The plan is fairly complex; however, before proceeding with the planting, I am attaching same for your review and comments . Very truly yours, i Richard F. Lark RFL:mdh Enc. SUMO A OOUNIY SWCD tauI A.'rctvycnhtis, crLc SX=110 Phow t681)727.2315%3 Georp hoic.,CWnmn FAX(631)727-8160 (show--ism March 31, 2014 Richard Lark MAY — 9 2014 28785 Main Rd Cutchogue, NY 11935 Sot,thoid awt► Dear Mr. Lark, Burd of Trustm A site visit was conducted at the residence of Ellen Emery at 5925 Nassau Point Road in Cutchogue to review the bluff and provide planting recommendations to aid in achieving bluff stabilization. The following are the recommendations reflective of this visit. The bluff is currently devoid of any vegetation due to the rebuilding of the bluff face following the storms of 2013 which severely eroded this bluff and threatening integrity of the house. The bulkhead at the toe of the bluff has been rebuilt and effectively tied into the neighboring property. A total of four retaining walls with tiebacks have been installed up the bluff face (3) and atop of the bluff (1) to provide additional reinforcement and stability. Many sections of the bluff were backfilled with sand brought in from offsite. A stairway has been constructed down the bluff face. The top most section is only six inches above the bluff face and increases in elevation as it travels down the slope. Am ° ak° 95, t 4 arts aSrt°.Mwk In order to achieve the best bluff stability, the top and toe of the bluff and any structures on the bluff must be stabilized prior to advancing vegetation of the bluff face. The roof runoff is being discarded into gutters and down spouts that discharge onto the ground surface and is eroding the down slope areas towards the southwestern side of the house. All discharges should be disposed directly into a dry well to facilitate proper disposal of roof runoff. The rear yard area should be vegetated with the recommended seed mix in the appendix. Seeding should occur before May 15 to facilitate establishment of vegetation without the need for irrigation as supplemental water applied at the top of the bluff is a potential source of erosion. The seed mix is selected for its high drought tolerance. Additionally, the use of native plants is strongly encouraged to reduce and eliminate the need for irrigation and ensure aesthetically pleasing landscape vegetation which do not require additional amendments including irrigation and fertilizers. All revegetation should involve the creation of a stable seed bed and the use of straw mulch and jute erosion control fabric on slopes. The woven jute is a more environmentally sensitive alternative to monofilament line as wildlife, both terrestrial and marine as they are less likely to get caught in the twine and the fabric still naturally degrades with the sun. Ti 14 a The bulkhead is providing the necessary stability at the toe but the cracked stayer on the north section of the bulkhead should repaired. However, near the top section of the stairs, a board of the existing bulkhead has become loose, allowing water and sediment to travel down the slope. This should be repaired immediately to prevent any further erosion. In addition, between this section of the retaining wall section and the top of the stairway, the natural grade directs and concentrates water towards and under the stairway. To prevent this as much as possible, the slope atop of this retaining wall should be graded to prevent water from concentrating and flowing down the bluff face and under the stairway. This is critically important as the stairway at this location is on or just above (4'- 6") above the bluff, preventing the establishment of stabilizing vegetation. Accordingly, the steep slopes, grade and lack of vegetation collectively magnify the erosive force of water and the erosion hazard to the retaining wall, stairs and bluff. s The northern section of the top bulkhead cuts in and behind a vertical lip with overhanging vegetation. A mature tree also occurs on this exposed and unstabilized section, leeward of the bulkhead. This section of retaining wall should be monitored for stability as the leeward vertical face cannot be cut back to a natural angle of repose (the recommended method for stability) because of the siting of this bulkhead. To help maintain as much stability as possible, this and all trees should be cut to the ground, leaving roots intact. �I sf tyWihrt'I}"""d'°s�31'�3 fl IIY �^ i r c .1iee'9�j i4� ' I This will help stabilize this site as trees on the bluff are a catalyst for erosion, as the rocking caused by winds loosens soils around the root structure ultimately causing toppling and opening the bluff to erosion. The trees should also be carefully bremoved frm the site (do not allow tree or sections of the tree to cascade down the bluff). These measures should be incorporated as much as possible prior to the seeding and vegetation of the bluff to avoid damage to vegetation and bluff face. Currently, straw based erosion control matting was installed on the entire bluff face in an effort to stabilize the soils through the winter months. In some areas, an impermeable plastic sheet was installed under the erosion control fabric. No seeding occurred under the erosion control fabric. As a result of lack of vegetation and winter precipitation the sediment has sloughed down the bluff face and has been deposited at the top of the lower retaining wall. The erosion control fabric at this under-cut sections no longer are in contact with the soil surface and are "floating" above grade. r i� Aic under erosion control matting I iitim &�- Vegetation on the bluff face is critically necessary to achieve stability. To facilitate a dense stand of vegetation, seeding and plugging in association with erosion control fabric is crucial. Erosion control fabric alone, while it provides a nominal level of protection will not (as it already has demonstrated) provide necessary structure to the slope to maintain bluff stability. The first step is to regrade the bluff face to create a natural angle of repose where sloughing and rills have occurred. This requires pulling back or temporarily removing the erosion control fabric to facilitate grading and seeding. If the fabric remains in structural condition it can be reused on the bluff face. Seeding of the bluff face should commence as directed in the enclosed "Stabilization of Eroding Bluff Faces" followed by laying of a light layer of straw and the erosion control fabric. Once this occurs, planting of Spartina patens and Beach grass plugs at 12"to 18"on center should commence. For every 4 beach grass and Spartina plugs—a plug of Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) and Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) should be planted. This will aid in diversifying the bluff face and ensuring vegetation persists under disease and climatic pressures. This planting scheme should occur from the top of the bluff face down to avoid trampling the plugs. It should also occur by erosion control fabric section but planting from top to bottom of the slope is encouraged. At the toe of the bluff, planting of Beachgrass and Spartina should occur at 12 inch centers with the intermittent planting of Switchgrass and Little bluestem. This planting should occur up to and along the entire length of the bulkhead to buffer against overtopping waves. However, this vegetation does not tolerate walking on, so access to the top of the bulkhead should be limited to walking on the grate rather than on the soils or vegetation. Y 4 At . .� j. a r K r� _ yeT S` 5. It is also critical to address the erosion that is occurring along the property boundary to the north. This erosion will continue to affect both yours and the neighboring properties and if not abated will be where the bluff erosion will catalyze and spread. Therefore, it is strongly encouraged that revegetation as recommended above along with erosion control fabric be installed to stabilize yours and the neighboring property. A list of additional herbaceous species which can be planted intermittently on the bluff and for purposes of landscaping the top of the bluff are also provided in the salt tolerant species list. No woody species however, should be planted on the bluff face. Lastly, the investment in this bluff is only recognized if the infrastructure and vegetation are maintained on the bluff. Therefore, inspections of the retaining walls and bulk head should be made periodically and especially after storm events with any repairs being made immediately. Similarly, the bluff face and top of the bluff should remain well vegetated. Dead plants should be replaced and no walking on the bluff or on the plants behind the bulkhead should be permitted. If you have any questions regarding these recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, i; Polly L.Weigand Soil District Technician Seed Mix for Shady Droughty Sites: Species Seeding Rate (Ibs/acre) Hard fescue 15.0 Chewings fescue 15.0 Creeping red fescue 15.0 Perennial ryegrass (turf type) 5.0 Autumn bentgrass 0.5 A � United States Department of Agriculture Suffolk County Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil&Water Conservation District 423 Griffing Ave. .,'' Riverhead,New York 11901 (631) 727-2315x3 M AY _ 9 2014 STABILIZATION OF ERODING BLUFFS 5oz,tfic d'scr,f;" B ar f r e I The coastal shoreline is affected by many different forces (tidal and wave action, wind, boat wakes, development, and wildlife) and is exposed to many harsh conditions (hurricanes, Nor;easters, freezing, precipitation, salt spray, flooding, and drought). A result of these forces and conditions is erosion. Bluff erosion is a natural process that can be slowed but not stopped. The only prediction that can be made is that bluff erosion will occur; the timing and magnitude of the erosion however cannot. Areas along the coastline may experience accelerated rates of erosion due to any of the above factors and the threat of erosion is magnified by winter storms and extreme high tides. In these instances, houses and structures sited atop of top of bluffs are at risk from erosion. H. The erosion of high sandy bluffs along coastlines has challenged conservationists since they were first observed. Typical of such bluffs are those along the north shore of Long Island. The soil material is sandy and erosive, being easily moved by wind or water. Bluff height varies from a few to well over 100 feet. The slopes vary but are usually very steep, occurring at a 1:1 ratio. The standard profile of an eroding bluff and the noted factors that individually and/or combined contribute to erosion. Typical Characteristics of Eroding Bluffs ,over Ivanal - -- a{ -_, a t"A May 2013 III. Numerous attempts have been made by landowners to stabilize bluff slopes; only a few have succeeded. Although no procedure can guarantee a permanent solution or stop this erosion, the following measures have been found to be the most effective in obtaining the best possible stabilization of the bluff face. Best Manazenment Practices for Slowinz Natural Bluff Erosion water diverted away from slope over hanging lip removed well vegetated slope Natural Angle of Repose P5 well vegetated toe r normal high tide Stabilization of the toe and top of the bluff (ideally simultaneously) must occur. Implementing practices (such as revegetation, terracing, geo-textiles) without achieving this stability will not be successful. Resulting in a loss of time, resources, and financial investment as these areas are compromised by erosion. Once both of these areas are stabilized, efforts should be focused on remediating the bluff face. Although stabilization of the toe and top is recommended first, the environment should be evaluated holistically. Thereby, remediation of the bluff face should occur in conjunction with and/or as soon as possible after the remediation of the top and toe. Top Stabilization: a. Remove the overhanging lip at the top of the slope creating a natural angle of repose. This is generally a 1:1 slope or 45 degree angle. b. Any trees along the top edge of the bluff should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. Tall trees swaying in the wind will loosen the bluff soils. c. Do not allow surface water (i.e. pool water, runoff, irrigation water) to flow over the top of the slope. Installation of a diversion with a catch basin drain and a vegetated natural buffer both serve this purpose. d. No ground disturbing activities should occur within 10 feet of the edge of the bluff. This includes installation of landscaping plants, irrigation systems, decks, and fences. e. Pools should be installed with an in ground drain to facilitate drainage (unless clay lenses exist within the bluff profile). May 2013 2 s1 I f. Houses should be fitted with gutters and down spouts which discharge into dry wells in order to reduce runoff flowing over the bluff edge. g. Sprinklers should not discharge water onto or near the bluff face. h. Irrigation scheduling should not exceed the peak consumptive requirements of the turf grasses (approximately 1"per week). Toe Stabilization: a. The use of vegetation is the preferred method to maintain a stabile toe. However, vegetation alone is not always successful. A good indicator of whether or not vegetation will stabilize the toe is the location of the mean high tide (MHT) mark. If MHT reaches the toe of the bluff, it is unlikely that vegetation alone will stabilize this site. If this is the situation, a consultation with NRCS or the SC SWCD can provide you with other alternatives. b. If a hardening structure, such as a bulkhead or rock revetment exists, it is critical that proper maintenance occurs to these structures. Such regular maintenance prolongs the life. The additional benefits are the protection the toe of the bluff and reduction in repair/replacement costs. The following are the maintenance activities that should occur on the bulkhead. ➢ Decaying and or damaged boards should be replaced. ➢ Holes behind the bulkhead should be filled with sand. ➢ Geotextile must be maintained between the bulkhead or revetment in order to retain sand behind the structure. The lack of geotextile in combination with wave action will pull sediment through the structure eventually cause collapse and,failure. ➢ Vegetation (beach grass, Spartina patens, Coastal Panic grass) should be maintained on top of the bulkhead. Bluff Face: a. Any trees along the top edge and on the bluff face should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. b. Trash, grass clippings, leaves and branches should not be disposed of on the bluff face. This creates instability as the debris adds weight to the bluff face and dually smothers vegetation. Thus, such debris should be removed from the bluff face and disposed of properly. c. A natural angle of repose should occur on the bluff face. Depending on the height and location of the vertical faces, such an angle may not be practical. Grading is a satisfactory practice to create such a natural slope at locations where such an angle can be achieved. Care should be taken to not disturb stabile areas of the bluff in an attempt to stabilize the eroding locations. Such precautions will prevent additional erosion problems on the bluff. d. Re/Vegetate the slope. ➢ `Cape' American beach grass and Spartina patens plugs should be used for this purpose and transplanted while dormant in the late winter or May 2013 3 early spring. Planting should occur from the top of the bluff face down. Both Spartina and Beachgrass should be planted 12" apart. Rows should be separated by 12" and the plants should be staggered with plants in adjacent rows. ➢ Each fall row should consist of entirely Beachgrass or Spartina`and the rows should alternate between these the two species. For Beachgrass, one 35mm film canister of Osmocote slow release fertilizer should be placed into each planting hole and then plant three stems or culms per hole. ➢ To add diversity to the bluff planting, reduce the threat of disease, and compensate for natural beach grass die out, it is recommended to broadcast the following warm season grass mixture immediately prior to planting the `Cape' American beach grass. ➢ The warm season grass mixture should consist of: `LI Ecotype or Blackwell' Switch grass (Panicum virgatum)* 4 PLS lb/Ac `Atlantic' Coastal panic grass (Panicum amarum)* 5 PLS lb/Ac `LI Ecotype or Niagara' Big bluestem(Andropogon gerardii)* 5 PLS lb/Ac Coastal or LI ECOTYPE Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium v. littoriale)* 3 PLS lb/Ac Sheep fescue (Festuca ovina) for quick, temporary cover 10 lb/Ac `Monarch' Seaside Goldenrod(Solidago sempervirens v. monarch) 1 lb/Ac `Golden Jubilee' Black-eyed Susan(Rudbeckia hirta) 1 lb/Ac Partridge Pea(Chamaecrista fasciculata) 1 lb/Ac Common Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis) 1 lb/Ac (*Rates are in Pure Live Seed in Pounds Per Acre.) Spreading this seed mix just prior to planting the Beachgrass and Spartina, allows for the incorporation of the seed by foot traffic and sand disturbance as the beach grass is planted. This action is critical to a good seed establishment. Adapted shrubs and vines can be added when the slope is well stabilized with the above listed grasses. Species include Bayberry, Beach pea, Shore rose, and Beach plum. ➢ Apply 201b/ac of nitrogen in June, if beach grass vigor is declining. ➢ Maintenance of the vegetated slope will be required on a continuous basis. Remove debris from planted areas; keep all water diverted from the slope; do not over-irrigate the lawn above; avoid excessive foot traffic and repair any damaged or eroding areas. May 2013 4 :USC}A ' United;States'DeperttnentpfAgricui#uie Plant Fact Sheet �tattit'al Resaurce�ConsejYa#�an$enrice; AMERICAN Another moisture conservation attribute of American beachgrass is that the rough upper leaf surface, BEACHGRASS containing gas exchange openings(stomata),will orient itself away from winds. The seedhead emerges Ammophila breviligulata Fern. in late July or August as a spike-like cluster at the tips of long stalks. This multi-flowered panicle Plant Symbol=AMBR extends about ten inches above the leaves. Seed Contributed by: USDA NRCS Plant Materials production is usually poor. Program Adaptation and Distribution This grass is a native of the mid-Atlantic coastal region from Maine to North Carolina and the Great Lakes. It will grow on sandy or other course textured soils on inland sites with or without high salinity, given that supplemental fertilizers are applied. This grass does not tolerate much soil moisture before it begins showing signs of stress. For a current distribution map,please consult the Plant Profile page for this species on the PLANTS d Website. Establishment USDANRCattonal Plant Materials Center Vegetative establishment of American beach Beltsville,MD g grass, with dormant stem divisions,from October 15 to April 1,is effective. Seed production is sparse so it is Uses not normally considered as an establishment option. American beachgrass is the predominant plant Beachgrass culms must be planted at least 8 inches species utilized along the Atlantic and Great Lakes deep. This prevents plants from drying out,as well coastlines for initial stabilization of frontal sand as being blown out by the wind. A tiling or ditching dunes. It has also been utilized on extreme,non-dune spade is an excellent tool for opening the planting sites,some having high salinity levels and droughty hole. conditions,for erosion control and initial cover. For erosion control and cover applications,two or Status more 18 to 24 inch long stems are mechanically or Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State hand placed, 18 to 24 inches apart,per planting hole. Department of Natural Resources for this plant's If the site is exposed to severe wind erosion,spacing current status(e.g.threatened or endangered species, needs to be reduced to 12 inches and rows staggered. state noxious status,and wetland indicator values). Utilizing an 18" spacing will require 38,720 culms per acre. Description For nursery production,the soil should be well American beachgrass is a leafy,spreading,strongly worked prior to planting. Single stems(12"to 18" rhizomatous grass,producing up to of 100 stems per long)should be planted one foot apart in rows, clump annually. This cool season perennial grass spaced wider than 30 inches to match cultivation species will spread up to 6-10 feet annually by equipment. Mechanical planting equipment is most subsurface rhizomes. It will grow to 2 or 3 feet tall, productive under these site conditions for areas tolerating annual over-topping accumulations of sand greater than 1/2 acre. up to a foot. The leaves have deeply furrowed upper surfaces and smooth undersides. The long narrow Management leaves may become rolled or folded when exposed to Properly applied fertilizer is the key to good vigorous intense heat,excessive sunlight,or drying winds. initial growth of newly established stands of American beachgrass. Applications providing Plant Materials<http://plant-materials.nres.usda.gov/> Plant Fact Sheet/Guide Coordination Page<http://plant-materials.nres.usda.gov/intranet/pfs.html> National Plant Data Center<http://npdc.usda.gov> LARK&FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 Tele.No.(631)734-6807 RICHARD F.LARK Fax No. (631)734-5651 MARY LOU FOLTS E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com January 31 2014 Southold Board of Town Trustees -•..____��__._.. .... 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 JAN 3 1 2014 Southold, NY 11971 ATT: Elizabeth Cantrell s.T,1iI u ""''j~ TrusteesBoard of RE: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) SCTM #1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Dear Ms . Cantrell: In response to your recent inquiry concerning the stair system on Ellen Emery' s property as set forth in her wetlands application dated January 17, 2014, be advised the stair system was built by Seacoast Construction, Inc. , as shown on the survey of John C. Ehlers dated 11- 20-2013 (Ex G) and as also shown on the "As Built Retaining Walls" by Dan Seligmann PE dated 12-12-13 (Ex F Item 1-A) and "As Built Retaining Wall Details" by Dan Seligmann PE Rev. 1. 01-08-14 (Ex F Item 1-B) . Running from the top of the bluff to Little Peconic Bay (west to east) , the stair system is described as follows : 1. 4 ' x 7 ' stair access walkway, 28+ sq. ft. , with 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to 2 . 4 ' x 28 ' set of stairs, treads 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to 3 . 75 sq. ft. landing with 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to 4 . 4 ' x 7 ' set of stairs, treads 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to 5 . '95 sq. ft. landing, 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to Southold Board of Town Trustees -2- January 31, 2014 6. 4 ' x 17 ' set of stairs, treads 1 ' x 5 ' composite decking by Timbertech; to 7 . 4 ' x 13 ' 52+ sq. ft. anti-skid fiberglass reinforced plastic walkway; to 8 . 4 ' x 10 ' set of stairs, flow-thru reinforced vinyl treads, to beach. Hopefully, this is in response to your questions concerning the stair system. However, if you have any other questions, do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, a L Richard F. Lark RFL/bd cc. : Lori Hulse, Esq. LARK& FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 Tele.No. (631)734-6807 RICHARD F.LARK Fax No. (631)734-5651 MARY LOU FOLTS E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com January 29, 2014 Southold Board of Town Trustees 54375 Main Road JAN 3 0 2014 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ,tl`wfi v RE: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee o r Tru Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) SCTM #1000-111. 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Gentlemen: Please treat the above-captioned application filed with you on January 17, 2014 as a full wetlands application and not an amendment of any prior permits . I have eliminated the word "AMENDED" where it appears in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" in three places of the application. It is my understanding the Trustees want to submit the Drainage Plan to the Southold Town Engineer. Therefore, I am providing a Drainage Plan prepared by Dan Seligmann PE dated 11-27-13 . Please note, a copy of the Drainage Plan appears in the application as Ex F Item 1-C. Also enclosed is my Check #2571 payable to Town of Southold for $400 . 00 . I am in the process of preparing an Indemnification to the Town of Southold for the work performed which will not affect the property owners, Daniel P. Orlando and Sandra L. Orlando as well as Krupski Family Limited Partnership. If you have any questions or need any other information, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, R chard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosures I James F-King,President o��pf s Urso Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr-,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 � Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 j John Bredemeyer f Michael J.Domino � � Telephone(631)765-1892 l�•�,Q� Fax(831)786-8641 130ARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES ! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only EJAN _. .^'' 'e__ Coastal Erosion Permit ApplidationWetland Permit Application Administrative Permit1 7 2014_Amendment/Ttansfer/E tensionReceived Applen: / 17/LlReceived Fee OO ? �iUi��li4bi�Gompleted Application 1 / u r Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type 11 Unlisted` Coordination:(dak.wnt) LWRI?Consistency Assessment form 1 / J a CAC Referral Sent 1 31 Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Re rt: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: 1 Public Hearing Held: Resolution: I. Name of Property Owner(s) Ellen F. Emery (Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) Address 121 Somerset Avenue, Garden City, New York 11530 Phone Numbev( ) (516) 746-4038 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 111.00-13.00-006.000 Property Location: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935 590' northerly of intersection of Wunneweta Road (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets,and location) AGENT: Lark & Folts, Esqs. (Richard F.- Lark, Esq and Mary Lou Folts, Esq.) (If applicable) Address: 28785 Main Road, P.O. Box 973, Cutchogue, New York - 11935 Phone: (631) 734-6807 5cj�� G-( a s I C all 1 l Mrd of Trustees Application , i GENERAL DATA ;. Land Area(in square feet): .83 acres (35,900± sq. ft.) Area Zoning: R-40 (Residential Low Density) I: Previous use of property: one-family dwelling i Intended use of property: one-family dwelling , Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes x No ' If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? Yes x No I.. If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review I and Elevation Plans will be required. i Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes x No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes X No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? X Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: ! Agency Date NYS DEC Hurricane Sandy 01/30/2013 (Ex A) General Permit Southold Town Trustees 8049 02/20/2013 (Ex B) Southold Town Trustees 8222 06/19/2013 (Ex C) �.• ' .Work under xmpnor permits/approvals for site improvements. was destroyed by Superstorm Sandy. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): to obtain wetland permits for: (a) "as built" restoration of bluff; (b) upland drainage plan; (c) 200 sq. ft. observation deck (10 feet landward from crest of bluff); I all as shown on Ex D, E, F and G. (SEE ATTACHED CONTINUATION PAGE�; � _ 1 2 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR ME110M WETLANDS PERMIT (CONTINUED) RS"b�1� 100 ' timber pile vinyl sheet beach bulkhead; 80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 25' ± landward of bulkhead; 80' mid-bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 55' ± landward of bulkhead; 85' timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with 12' return and 25' return located 10' ± landward from top of bluff; 4' wide stairs supported by 8" timber pile posts with stair treads of Timbertech composite decking from top of bluff to top of bulkhead; 4' wide beach stairs parallel to bulkhead with fiberglass reinforced plastic treads; 1800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material; placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff. -P`QPeJ Rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front-yard area. PCoQos-eA 200 sq. ft. deck of Timbertech composite decking supported by 6" x 6" posts, located in rear yard 10' landward from the top of the bluff. CONTINUATION PAGE GENERAL DATA - PROJECT DESCRIPTION Board of Trustees Application GNERAL DATA (continued) Ex D - Affidavit of Ellen F. Emery, sworn to on January 10, 2014 Ex E - Letter of Ellen F. Emery dated January 10, 2014 enclosing 8 copies of photos Ex F - Seacoast Construction, Inc. - CONSTRUCTION REPORT OF EMERY PROPERTY DAMAGED BY HURRICANE SANDY Attached to this report are the following items: Item#1: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E., December 12, 2013, "Inspection of Bluff, Erosion Repairs and Erosion Protection, new retaining walls, as built drawings and details, drainage plan and recommendations", with the following attachments: A. Plan: As Built Retaining Walls,Drawing#101, 12-12-13; B. Plan: As Built Retaining Wall Details, Drawing#102, 12-12-13; C. Plan: Drainage Plan, Drawing DP-1, 11-27-13; D. Plan: Proposed Deck Details, Drawing#D-1, 1-8-14. Item#2: Report of Daniel Seligmann, P.E.,November 15, 2013, "Inspection of House Foundation". Item#3: Building Permit#38536, issued by Southold Town Building Department, 11-27-13. Ex G - Survey of premises by John C. Ehlers Land Surveyor last revised 11-20-2013 2a B___d of Trustees Application ` ,- I I WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA I Purpose of the proposed operations: to restore bluff and protect house foundation from further settling as shown on attached Ex D, E, F and G. Area of wetlands on lot: -0- square feet Percent coverage of lot: -0- % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feck bulkhead adjacent to Peconic. Bay Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: N/A feet f' f Does the project involve excavation or filling? f No X Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? -0- cubic yards { How much material vvto filled? 1,800 cubic yards varies Depth-of which material mak =deposited: 3 to 24 feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 60 degrees, more or less Manner in which material x;L%wF=evav r'deposited: via telebelt from top of bluff Statement of the effect,if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): None 3 LARK& FOLTS Attorneys at Lava 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 C Tele. No. (631) 734-6807 FEB 1 8 2014 Fax No. (631) 734-5651 E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com � � BQAW r Trustees RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS February 18, 2014 Ms. Elizabeth Cantrell - Southold Board of Town Trustees 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) y SCTM #1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Dear Ms . Cantrell : In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the Proof of Mailing of Notice along with the green signature cards from the certified mailings . Also enclosed is the Affidavit of Posting. Very truly yours, Richard F. Lark RFL/bd Enclosures t' ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: 1000-111.00-12.00-005.005 Curt Koch 6030 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 1000-111.00-13.00-005.000 30 Hillcrest Drive, Pelham Manor, NY 10803 Daniel P. Orlando Sandra L. Orlando 1000-111.00-13.00-007.000 Krupski Family Limited Partnership 95 Laurel Hill Road, Northport, NY 11768 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK BARBARA DIACHUN , residing at 875 School House Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935 , being duly sworn,deposes and says that on the 11th day of February 20 1L deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Cutchogue, New York that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Barbara Diachun Sworn to before me this 11th Day of February 120 14 Notary Public MARY D.HOLLAND Notary Pub;�ic,S New York �HC Coon 6 1 U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILT. RECEIPT ! m (DomesticMail Only;No Insurance Coverage Proylqqd) CO Ln r-q I 400dk ,119 ' 111 LU 3 CO Postage $ $0.49 /, 93 65,E Certified Fee $3.30/4'103 �O` O Return Receipt Fee �r stma O (Endorsement Required) $2.7 �� Here Restricted De lnrery Fee ✓` eC/, C:3 (Endorsement Required) $0.00 C3 M Total Postage&Fees $ $6.4911L2014i ! Sent To Curt Koch I O Street,Apt IVo.; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- r- orPoeoxNo. 6030 Nassau Point Road ------------ ----------------------- -- City,State,ZIP+4 Cutcho ue, NY 11935 PS Form :rr August 2006 See Reverse or InstructionsI Posta.1 serviceTMru (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Coverage Provided) i COCERTIFIED MAILT. RECEIPT Lr) For delivery ififormAtion visit our website.at www.usps.conne CO g $0.70 Posta e $ Certified Feerq $3.30/'C^, 03 s9 C3 Return Receipt Fee P Ont Required) $2.7 re Restricted Delivery Fee \✓ j O (Endorsement Required) $0,00 -2 , O C- Ln Postage&Fees $ $6.70 e�/1ct9� Sent To p�n�r E 8rjando $$ oQr an o . ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1 p Street,Apt.No.; - tti orPoeoxNo. 30 Hillcrest Drive I ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Ciry,State,Z/P+4 i Pelham Manor, NY 10803 :rr August 200e See Reverse f or Instructions -r CERTIFIED 'MAILTm RECEIPT oM (DomesticOnly; CO N ,. NO�tT�1FOR Ur 47C � A L U 3 1 Postage $ $0.70 1414 gas w r-R Certified Fee $3.30 P tk p\ Return Receipt Fee t •Hfe`e°° C3 (Endorsement Required) $2.70 C, �� re ` Restricted Delivery Fee O (Endorsement Required) $0.00 O Ln Total Postage&Fees $ $6.70 0 M Sent To Krupski Family Limited Partnership - -- - -- ----------------------------- NStreet,Apt or PoBox No.No.;95 Laurel Hill Road ------ ------------------------ - -- - --_--- --------- CIry,Nite,ZlPlorthport, NY 11768 :rr August 2006 I� ELLEN F. EMERY 1 REVOCABLE TRUST 1000-111 . 00-12 . 00-005 . 005 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signatur7 ! + item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X •' ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee so that we Can return the card to you. B. Re eived by(Print d ame) C. D to of D ive ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Vv" }_ C 1 411q- or on the front if space permits. U D. Is delivery address different from item 17 JE3 Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No Curt Koch 6030 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 3. Service Type Lf Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mall ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7 011 3500 0001 1681 5834 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 + 1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-005 . 000 N04 rr4ume � 1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-007 . 000 ',;�'AVDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY zd Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A.�aat ,rem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. C- or 13Agent Print your name and address on the reverse _ El Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Redeived by(Printed Name C. Date of Delivery L9 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery adder diffe�;from item 17 ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delive�addc99s�ow: ❑No r:...upski Family Limited ``JJ Partnership 5 Laurel Hill Road i�Ierthport, NY 11768 3. Service Type �' ../��/ J Certified Mail,R3--apre Mail ❑ Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 5 0 0 0001 16 81 5 810 (Transfer from service label) _l" PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540; i John Bredemeyer, President gUFFDtt Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President 54375 Route 25 James F. King W P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) __ . AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR EIGHT DAYS I, RICHARD F. LARK ,T0Sitklrg7at/dba 28785 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935 being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 11 t1day of February , 2014, I personally posted the property known as 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, February 19,2014. Dated: February 18, 2014 t (si ature) Richard F. Lark_ Sworn to before me this 18th day of Feb.2014 Notary Public BARBARA DIACHUN Notary Public, State of New York No 01 D14635190-Suffolk County Commission expires Oct,31,20f y NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: E'!en F �v�►� e /999 Revocov6le 1074s+- SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: See, FM Toa-ci Tr05ec+ 1:)e=kP- +#* TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: • &kci �e��, FebnAary 19, �or� - �` l�I- 5.b deo .�� 'W,If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection priot to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631, ) 765-1892 John Bredemeyer, President o�-.UfF04�o Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino., Vice-President �� oy 54375 Route 25 James F. King P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Saunders • Southold,NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTICE OF HEARING PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2014 Lark & Folts, Esqs. on behalf of ELLEN F. EMERY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST requests a Wetland Permit for the as-built 100' timber pile vinyl sheet bulkhead; as-built 80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±25' landward of bulkhead; as-built 80' mid- bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located ±55' landward of bulkhead; as-built 85' timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with a 12' return and a 25' return located ±10' landward from top of bluff; as-built bluff stairs from top of bluff to beach consisting of a 4'x7' access platform leading to a 4'x28' set of stairs with associated 75sq.ft. platform to a 4'x7' set of stairs with associated 95sq.ft. platform to a 4'x17' set of stairs leading to a 4'x13' walkway with a 4'x10' set of stairs to beach parallel to bulkhead, supported by 8" timber pile posts and composite materials on stair treads and decking; as-built 1 ,800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material with placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff; for a proposed rear- yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front yard area; and for a proposed 200sq.ft. 'deck of composite decking supported by 6"x6" posts located 10' landward from top of bluff. Located: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. SCTM# 111-13-6 l i 9"rd of Trustees Application 4 L i. County of Suffolk State of New York ELLEN F. EMERY (Trustee) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE j DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE I TRUE TO THE BEST OF-HIB/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER,SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY I. BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES(S),TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature of Pr perty weer Ellen F. Emery (Trustee) SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 10th DAY OF January ,2014 z > o otary Public ROM F.LARK Rd 30E001Nlewyet mon Expires A .31 i I i a 4 - a 1 ;'ird of Trustees Applicatiol AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) 1, Ellen F. Emery (Trustee) residing at 121 Somerset Avenue, (print owner of property) (mailing address) Garden City, NY 11530 do hereby authorize Richard F. Lark, Esq. or Mary Lou (Agent) Folts, Esq. of , Lark & Folts, Esqs. to apply forpermit(s)from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. 4t Tal I (Owner's signature) Ellen F. Emery (Trustee) I i APPLICANUAGENUREPRESENT.A.TM TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold' Co—dUjEthics vtowbits cNflLctsounteristonthemon6moffice wdaldmez,Dhe e this form is tourovide infortnetion which alert the town of uossible conflicts of Merest and al ow it to take whatever action is ! necessery to avoid same. YOURNAME: EMERY, ELLEN-.F. :. I (Last name,fi stname,4tiddle initial,unless you=applying in the name of ? someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicatethe.other person's or company's name.) s • I NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building !l Variance Trustee X ! Change of Zone Coastal Erosion _ Approval ofplat Mooring { Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other f' (lf"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest"Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO % f Ifydu answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and slate and sign where indicated. I Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicanVagent/representadve)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all Ilial apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%ofthe shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporatianr B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when.the applicant is not a corporation), C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D}the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP NONE •• I • 1 " t Submitted th t f u r 0 Signature Print Name F EMERY Form TS 1 - t f1 - i APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATNE ' TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Cod thins prohibits conflicts of interest o the officers and em to ees.The e o eofE p +? this form is to provide i orination which alert the town of possible conflicts of kderest and Almir it to take wha�ey_er acfion is Qcary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: LARK, RICHARD F. (Last name,fust name,ipiddle initial,unless you ate applying iu the name of someoneelseor other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate.the other person's or company's name.) : NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) ! Tax grievance Building i Variance Trustee % Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval ofplat Mooring Exemption from plat or official neap Planning 1 Other (If"Other",name the activity.) ' Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee '. of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,,or business interest"Business interest'means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partsal ownership of(or employment by}a corporation , in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. j . I YES NO X Ifydu answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. it Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person ! Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/aganthep+esentative)and the town officer or employee.Either check I the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided ' The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): .. A}the owner of greater than 5%of the shams of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporations B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); ! C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D}the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION Oh RELATIONSHIP NONE 1 - Submitted this 10th da of J uar Zt>� 14 • Signature � - PrintName Richard F. L rk ' Form TS I - I• APPLICANT/AGENTMEPRESENTATNE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of 5outltold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of intefe��the»art of town officers and emalovees.The liu-M se of this form is to ILmvide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take wbatever action is necessary to avoid same. • FOLTS, MARY YOUR NAME: LOU - (Last name,fust name,4dddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other I " person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Cheek all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee X `Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other-,name the activity.) i Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or busmess ipterest "Business interest';means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation 1 in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%ofthe shares. _ s YES NO X Ifydu answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. 1 Name of person employed by the Town of Southold R Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agcot/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicont (when the applicant is a corporation); E B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(wheu the applicant is not a corporation); '. C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. • I DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP . i NONE i Submitted this 'day of Ja uar 20� 14 Signatureei�/! -� Print Name Mary L Fo is Form TS I • - t 6I Z 20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing i G t Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. I Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. t Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. k Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Ellen F. Emery (Trustee of theEllenF,. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) I Name of Action or Project: Ellen F. Emery Residence IIII Project location(describe,and attach a location map): 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York (SCTM #1000-111-13-6) f Brief Description of Proposed Action: Wetlands Permit approval for: (a) "as built" restoration of'bluff destroyed by Superstorm Sandy; (b) upland drainage plan; (c) 200 sq. ft. observation deck 10' landward from crest of bluff; all in accordance with attached plans prepared by Daniel Seligmann, P.E. (SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION) Name of Applicant or Sponsor. Telephone: (516) 746-4038 1 Ellen F. Emery E-Mail: Address: s ° 121 Somerset Avenue City/PO: State: Zip Code: Garden City New York 11530 1 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO 11S administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ® ❑ 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 3_6,155 -aero sq., f t. b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? r 6,000 -aeres. s q. f t. c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. 0Urban []Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial h Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 r PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR WETLANDS PERMIT (CONTINUED) �S -Pl)"`k 100 ' timber pile vinyl sheet beach bulkhead; -80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 25' ± landward of bulkhead; 80' mid-bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 55' ± landward of bulkhead; 85' timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with 12' return and 25' return located 10' ± landward from top of bluff; 4' wide stairs supported by 8" timber pile posts with stair treads of Timbertech composite decking from top of bluff to top of bulkhead; 4' wide beach stairs parallel to bulkhead with fiberglass reinforced plastic treads; 1800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material; placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff. Dab�useRear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front-yard area. 200 sq. ft. deck of Timbertech composite decking supported by 6" x 6" posts, located .in rear yard 10' landward from the top of the bluff. CONTINUATION PAGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A i a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ ❑ i b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ X❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES I If Yes,identify: _ S. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES ❑X ❑ 1 b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? 0 ❑ j c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ® ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES i If No,describe method for providing potable water: ® ❑ !� 1 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ® ❑ !' 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑ ❑ b.is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? X 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES t wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑ ,b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? g 1f Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: ;. adjacent wetland is Peconic Bay i 14. Identi the typical habitat es that occur on,or are like] to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Identify rip rip y I ®Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? X❑ ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES TTi 3 17.Will the,proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ ❑ a.Will storm water discharges Flow to adjacent properties? [:1 NO ❑YES b.Will stonn water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? �. If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO []YES Page 2 of 4 I I T I S.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ ❑ j 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 20.Has the site of flee proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ i I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE i Applicant/sponsor n en Em Date: January 10, 2014 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur I. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? X❑ , ❑ i 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ ❑ y 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ - 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the L=-� establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? FXI E] J 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ® ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ❑ reasonablyavailable energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, FX] ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ EJ waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 ! J 1 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage ❑X ❑ problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. I f` ! I I� l Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. � Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Na a ofDead Agency Date QW'MV President Print or Type NameofZ onsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer o e of Res o i le Officer in'Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT page 4 of 4 I �osvk Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Rete-off ASSESSMENT FORM f- PROPERTY LOCATION: s.CT.M.d: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A ro" 1000 111 13 6 STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ' -bTi Ice see on 'f3fiick� Tot— CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEiN YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No ; a_ What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? 1 Will this Project Retain All Storm Water Run-Off (include Total Area of all Parcels located within 36,155 s } the Stupe of Work for Proposed Construction) q Generated by a Two(2'�Inch Rainfall on Site? (S.F.rAcres) '(This item will include all run-off created by site X b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all — and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed 62000 s q. Site Improvements and the permanent creation of Construction a0tiv3[y? impervious surfaces.) PROVIDE BRIEF PRQJECT DESCRIPTION tPrerldeAd&1knelPew*asNwdcM Z Does the Site Pian Indio Survey Show Lova Proposed X Drainage Structures indicating Size&Location?This X Item shall Include all Proposed Grade Changes and Obtain wetlands permit for complete Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey damtribe the erosion — bluff restoration; wetlands permit and sediment control practices that will be used to X control site erosion and storm water discharges. This for drainage plan; wetlands permit, for item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. I - deck construction 10' landward from 4 will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or Excavation where there Is a change to the Natural X f crest of bluff; all per plans of Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards F — of Material within any Parcel? Daniel Seligmann, P.E'. 5 Will this Application Require Lend Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area In Excess of Five Thousand X ' (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surrace? — 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction X General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or Subtnlsslon of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities involving soil Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more ewes:including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes are part of a larger Common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to including Construction activities involving soil disturbances of lass than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? X the DEC has determined theta SPDES permit Is required for storm water discharges, (SWPPP'sShall meet the Minimum Requirements ofthe SPOES General Permit $ Will Driveways,Perking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP4-10.001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to fie submittai of the N01.The N01 shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-ot way/l submitted to the Department prior to fie comr am*ment of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shell describe the erosion and sediment contort practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of matetiai. required,post-construclion stonnwater management practices that will be used andlor Rernoval of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any X omsbucted to reduce the pollutants in stone water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the temp and conditions of this permit.In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?Inca Item win NOT Imiude aha Instauetim of bdvwmy Aprorml El I kienitiy potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to effect the quality of Storm water discharges. NOTE: If AnyAnswer to Questions One through?Ane Is Answered with a Check Mark 3.All SWPPPs that require the postconsbuttiion storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance Is between 3,000.5X.&1 Acre in area, r a Storni Water,Gradfng,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan Is Required itythelrown of component shall be prepared by a quailed Design Professional Licensed in NewYork Southold and Must be submitted for RaVorw Prior to Issuance of Any Building PermiL that is knowledgeable In the principles and practices of Storm Water Management I {NOTE: A Check Mark(.I)andrer Answer for each Guesnon is Requlred fora Complete Application) SPATE OF NEW YORK, SUFFOLK COUNTY OF...........................................SS '1,bat l ,ELLEN F. EMERY (Trustee),,,......being drily sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, (Name of Individual slgning,DochanenQ And that heVshe is the ........ Owner.... ......... ... ........................................................................... '(tANiier,Contractor.Agent Coiporaie Ofet mle bf-theOwlerorE)wners,and is duly authorized to perform orhave pgformed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of Tmowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; 10th f January 2014 ................�....... ..... dDaly a .1. ..............._.........._.. Notary Public: ......... ` =.•••.U.��T `?................. .......... ........ Ellen F. Emery (Signatro fappitca > Trust FORM - 06110 ROM WX � YcrFr Aug.31,-goQ- o If Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM ' A. INSTRUCTIONS i - l. All applicants for permits' including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *.except minor exempt actions including Building Permits ! and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt I minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Water&ont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant i beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). �. 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes"or"no", then the proposed action will ' affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency �. review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- } sup0orting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. . A copy.of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all i local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 111 _ 13 6 4 E PROJECT NAME ELLEN F. EMERY RESIDENCE f The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): • Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees X❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ I - (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: LxJ Nature and extent of action: .Permit approval for: "as built" restoration of bluff destroyed by Superstorm Sandy; upland drainage plan; observation deck 10' landward from crest of bluff; (SEE-ATTACHED'CONTINUATION PAGE PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR WETLANDS PERMIT (CONTINUED) 100 ' timber pile vinyl sheet beach bulkhead; 80' timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 25' ± landward of bulkhead; 80' mid-bluff timber pile tongue-and-groove sheet retaining wall with two 8' returns located 55' ± landward of bulkhead; 85' timber pile vinyl sheet retaining wall with 12' return and 25' return located 101 ± landward from top of bluff; 4' wide stairs supported by 8" timber pile posts with stair treads of Timbertech composite decking from top of bluff to top of bulkhead; 4' wide beach stairs parallel to bulkhead with fiberglass reinforced plastic treads; 1800 cubic yards clean fill spread evenly between retaining walls to replace lost bluff material; placement of erosion control jute matting on bluff. 0�_o�Qjl Rear-yard drainage system to direct roof rain and surface water away from house foundation and upland retaining wall by providing a drainage swale with 4" PVC pipe to a drywell in the front-yard area. XO�OSA 200 sq. ft . deck of Timbertech composite decking supported by 6" x 6" posts, located in rear yard 10' landward from the top of the bluff. CONTINUATION PAGE SECTION B-1 LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM * T Location of action: 5925 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York I E Site acreage: 6,000 sq. ft. e ' I Present land use: one-family dwelling Present zoning classification: R-40 (Residential Low Density) 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: 1 (a) Name of applicant: ELLEN F. EMERY (Trustee of the Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trusjt) (b) Mailing address: 121 Somerset Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (516) 746-4038 k (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes,which state or federal agency? j i ' ies b analyzing how the project will further support or C. Evaluate the project to the following policies y lyz g p � pp not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LVIRP Section III—Policies;Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Complete restoration to protect bluff soil from eroding into Bay Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LNW Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No El Not Applicable f i i 1 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See . LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria i ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Restoration has prevented future bluff erosion Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP . Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria x Yes ❑ No 11 Not Applicable I "as built" restoration has prevented erosion Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of.Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Eld Not Applicable I i ' I f l Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—PoIicies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. LJ ❑ ❑ Yes No Not Applicable i, prevent soil polution of Peconic Bay C II I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes []No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public E resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III=Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeO No© Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES ! ' i Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑x Not Applicable I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable ` Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands•in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No❑x Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Ed Not Applicable PREPARED BY Richard F.. Lark TITLE Attorney DA'I'Di 1/10/14 - E • r LARK&FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE,NEW YORK 11935 Tele.No. (631)734-6807 RICHARD F.LARK Fax No. (631)734-5651 MARY LOU FOLTS E-mail: LarkandFolts@aol.com January 17, --�_ Southold Board of Town Trustees 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 JAN 1 7 2014 Southold, NY 11971 Sof;thu�ti 1LvCii R RE: Application of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee o ar fru Ellen F. Emery 1999 Revocable Trust) SCTM #1000-111 . 00-13 . 00-006. 000 Gentlemen: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing four copies of the following: 1 . Board of Town Trustees Wetland Permit Application with exhibits 2 . Short Environmental Assessment Form 3 . Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off Assessment Form 4 . Authorization of Ellen F. Emery (Trustee) 5 . Applicant/Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Forms : Ellen F. Emery, Richard F. Lark and Mary Lou Folts 6. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 7 . 30-Year Maintenance Agreement Form, signed by Ellen F. Emery (Trustee) on January 10, 2014 and notarized, with attached survey by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, last dated 11-20-13 8 . Lark & Folts, Esqs . check #2551 in the amount of $100 . 00 If you need any other information, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ichard F. Lark RFL:mdh Encs . Jj-�p � ) I a �ZeY^A-nom►^ • I I • Tpa L _ - - - ,Roy- - s; 2013 - -- ---- �, - --- - -- _��- 4 S - ---- -- --- - -- S `iai Towne __ . � t�V� ��'� c,,i�7�-,ova ��P...��-�/�� t,�1i1�1 Z/�►_ !12 __ i - - ley VT NOV #8 2013 Dan Seligmann, PE 24 Cherry Lane, Huntington, NY 11743 631-423-2544 908-400-3580 Cell ECF " 2013-002 NOV 1 2 2013 November 11, 2013 JW,rd al i.�1Ut�;Cill�UYdiZ•»- T � CLIENT: Seacoast Construction PO Box 893 Sayville,NY 11782 REFERENCE: Ellen Emery Residence 5925 Nassau Point Southold,NY SUBJECT: Inspection of house foundation INSPECTION DATE: October 30, 2013 and November 9, 2013 1 SUBJECT: Performed field inspection of house foundation and recommend repair schemes for cracking of foundation elements BACKGROUND: The property overlooks Little Peconic Bay facing northeast on a bluff approximately 55 feet above the water and 81 feet back. A bulkhead along the beach runs the length of the property north to south. Due to a super storm Sandy and a subsequent Nor'Easter the existing bulkhead wall had failed causing the slope to collapse taking down the existing stairway to the beach and bulkhead. The retaining wall failed removing the toe stability of the slope causing massive failure of the slope and erosion of the existing hillside. The one story home is approximately 34 feet from the retaining wall and 43 feet from the bluff. The home is wood construction with a cinderblock foundation. There is an entrance on the east side of the house that exits onto a small stoop with one step down to grade. The basement level is at grade on the northwest side of the home at the two car garage. The north side of the house slopes down to the garage. The south west side of the house slopes up toward the main level of the house. The property generally slopes down to the street. DISCUSSION: You advised that during the reconstruction of the bulkheads and retaining walls tension cracks in the soil were observed at the north east corner of the house and radiated out from the corner. Cracks were also observed perpendicular to the east wall of the house running approximately 30 feet cast from the house approximately halfway along the foundation form north to south. You advised these cracks were approximately 1-2 inches wide. At your request an inspection of the basement walls and foundation was made to determine if any settling may have occurred due to the failure of the slope and massive erosion of the bluff. The review of the construction indicates the foundation may have been expanded from its original size or it was constructed of different elements. The southeastern quadrant of the foundation is raised approximately 2 feet above the garage floor. This area is approximately 15 feet by 30 feet and is approximately half of the width of the structure. The western side is raised approximately 14" above the garage floor. This area coincides with a change in the width of the cinder blocks from 8"to 10"wide. This transition occurs approximately 30 feet from the south end of the structure (See plan of foundation SK-1). There is a stoop outside the east side of the home that was observed to be separated from the foundation wall approximately 1/2". Photo 1. 2 The north side of the property slopes down from east to west to the gal-age level. There is a roof drain at the corner of the garage that has a disconnected pipe into the ground allowing the water to flow into the corner. Photo 8. There are numerous cracks that were observed in the foundation walls. There was one crack in the garage floor at the northwest corner of the structure. The foundation walls show cracks at various locations shown on sketch SK-1. They are summarized as follows: East Wall: • At NE corner the block is rotated outward and joints are cracked for 3 courses. There is a gap between window and blocks.Photo 2 and 3. • Approximately 19 feet south the joints are cracked for 5 courses. Photo 4. • Approximately 32 feet south at the joint where the 10" and 8" block meet there is a vertical crack along the 8" blocks. Photo 5. • Approximately 5 feet north of the southeast corner there are hairline cracks for 3 to 5 courses from the top. • Approximately 2 feet north of corner inset joint is cracked for I course. South Wall: • Approximately 9 feet west of the corner hairline cracks at the joints four courses from the top. West wall: • Approximately 34 feet north the wall is cracked near the fuel tank near the transition from the 8" cinder block to the 10" cinder block wall. Photo 6 and Photo 7. North Wall: • Approximately 8 feet east of the corner the wall is cracked at the window for 6 courses. COMMENTS: It would appear the cracks along the east walls were caused by settlement or shifting of the soil east of the home due to the collapse of the bluff. This would be confirmed by the observance of the tension cracks on the east side of the house along the bluff. This is consistent with a slope stability failure caused by the erosion of the bluff. The joint where the two sizes of cinder blocks creates a weak point in the foundation walls. See detail I on SK-1. This is shown by the cracks exhibited at those locations. The extent of the footings is unknown. I recommend some test pits be dug to expose the footings to see the size and depth. This should be done at several points along the foundation specifically at the 10" block walls; 8"bloc_ k walls at the transition between the cinder block sizes and at the raised floor area. 3 The settlement at the northwest side of the foundation is likely caused by water pooling and draining into the cornet-of the foundation at the garage door undermining the footing. The bluff has been stabilized so no further erosion is expected. The extent of the soil stability cannot be determined but if the foundation was undermined differential settlement could cause potential additional settlement over time. To prevent possible continued settlement and cracking of the foundation I would recommend underpinning the foundation along the north and east wall. The west wall north of the transition between the 8" and 10 block at the fuel tank should also be underpinned. Helical piles should be used since they can be installed with minimum impact to the foundation. They can be installed inside the basement. I would recommend using a minimum 10"-12" double flight helix at 5 foot spacing with a developed capacity of 10 tons per pile. The minimum depth should be 15 feet below the foundation.A foundation bracket bolted to the footing should be used. The brackets should be preloaded to transfer the load from the foundation to the pile. Care should be taken in the installation at the location where the basement floor steps up. The cinder block walls at the north east corner should be removed and reset. I recommend replacing the basement window since it is not in good condition and has separated from the cinder block. Care should be taken not to remove more than two blocks at a time or provide temporary support from the wooden sill plate above. The cracks along the foundation can be repaired in several ways. The simplest method would be to seal the hairline cracks with an injectable epoxy sealer suitable for masonry walls from both sides. Larger cracks can be repaired by removing the mortar and replacing the mortar joints. Since the bluff has been stabilized it is unlikely the stoop will settle further. One or two low capacity helical piles can be installed if needed. A new drainage scheme should be developed for the property. The water from the back yard should be directed toward the street using a French drain and swale with piping to a drywell in the driveway. All of the gutter downspouts should be connected to the drainage system as well. pSeliGITnIann Submitted, Professional Engineer NY 4 PHOTOS: r �3 a i e§ Photo 1 r: ,III, 1�6V�'l �Vl�i'i��I�IIIIII "II' it ^l ,' fit. �04 �- F Photo 2 '24 #t � Y F � p � y: 1 Photo 3 v 4 .� vv�`oA�.a \ \\ 6 Photo 4 y_ Photo 5 7 ,r ,rye Photo 6 Y: 'a AKm Photo 7 8 a �•�� roe r. _M ? k .' ,t r, Photo 8 9 10"CMU 81"CMU 5--k L,j Vi 11 5ectim A-A 0 0 0 F 0 0 L J r1rTf Fan Vim „1•I'.--1'01 5ectIon C-C Foundation Plan Hen �rnerq Fe5iclonce 5925 Nassau Point U cutchoque, NY 11935