Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-8973 50(/� Michael J.Domino,President SOF� y��® Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders u, Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith ® yO� Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski Cou IN,, Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 1358C Date: July 11, 2017 TRIS CERTIFIES that the construction of a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over theagully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4"tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c.,2"x6"stringers, and 2"x8"headers; with the condition of the installation of two (2) 6"x6"posts at seaward end to provide storm surge protection; At 695 Pettys Drive, Orient Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-14-2-23 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated February 3, 2017 pursuant to which Trustees Wetland Permit#8973 Dated March 22,2017,was issued and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for construction of a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking,4"x4"tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers,and 2"x8"headers; with the condition of the installation of two (216"x6"posts at seaward end to provide storm surge protection. The certificate is issued to PAUL&MARGARET KOBALKA owners of the aforesaid property. Authorized Signature Michael J. Domino,President � 010 Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith ® a0 Telephone (631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski ®lE/CouN11� Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 71el� DATE OF INSPECTION: /7 Ch. 275• Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction Y2 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: KO iLvieb'fs^ y CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: �oF soar Michael J.Domino,President Town y01� Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 Charles J.SandersP.O.Box 1179 vs Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith ® aOQ Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupski c®UNTY Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 5, 2017 Paul & Margaret Kobalka 695 Pettys Drive Orient, NY 11957 RE: 695 PETTYS DRIVE, ORIENT SCTM#: 1000-14-2-23 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kobalka: On March 22, 2017 we issued Permit#8973 to you relative to the above premises. Please be advised that in response to your request to be able to use a pressure treated wood rather than a Tropical hardwood for the 4"x4"posts, 2"x6" stringers, 2"x8" headers and (2) 6"x6" posts at seaward end; you are hereby authorized to do so. Sincerely, a Michael J. Domino, President Board of Trustees MJ D/dd DiSalvo, Diane From: DiSalvo, Diane Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 10:23 AM To: 'Paul Kobalka' Subject: RE: Permit#8973 Walkway Pilings Showed your letter below to Trustee Domino. He said that once the in-house Resolution is passed you will not be able to use the tropical hardwood because it cannot be determined that the wood came from a sustainable environmentally correct harvesting system. You will be able to use pressure treated wood for all of the structural components-(but still need to use thru-flow for the decking). Hope this now makes it clear to you. Diane -----Original Message----- From: Paul Kobalka [mailto:pak1949@optimum.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 4:08 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Subject: Permit#8973 Walkway Pilings Hi Diane, We received your voice message. We need to clarify what the Trustees mean by"they will release us from the use of tropical hardwood?" Does that mean we are released from FSC tropical hardwood and can use tropical hardwood that is not FSC certified? Or does that mean we can use another wood product? If that's the case, what wood product can we use for the pilings? For example: Is 6"x6"pressure treated wood from Home Depot acceptable? We want to make sure to do this correctly. Thank you for your efforts and patience in helping us. Paul & Margaret Kobalka 1 �®f SOOT Michael J.Domino, President �0� yQ�o Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders C/, Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith ® a� Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Yxupski lif'CoUffN Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1 st day of construction / Y2 constructed V Project complete, compliance inspection TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Paul&Margaret Kobalka residing at 695 Pettys Drive, Orient,New York, as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits ansing directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized,or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required,upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 10. No right to trespass or interfere with riparian rights. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title,or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. �pf S004 Michael J.Domino,President �o� yolk Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President 54375 Route 25 Charles J.Sanders P.O.Box 1179 cs> >c Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith aQ Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas KrupskiCQUNTIFax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 22, 2017 Paul & Margaret Kobalka 695 Pettys Drive Orient, NY 11957 RE: PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA 695 PETTYS DRIVE, ORIENT SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kobalka: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated February 3, 2017, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local-Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policies 4.1 and 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: install two (2) 6"x6" posts at most seaward end for storm surge protection, applicant to provide verification that Tropical hardwood being used is in fact approved by the Forest Stewardship Council, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 22, 2017, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, 2 i WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the projectas proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, I NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, i RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA to construct a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4" tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers, and 2"x8" headers; with the condition of the installation of two (2) 6"x6" posts at seaward end to provide storm surge protection; provide verification that the Tropical hardwood being used is approved by the Forest Stewardship Council; and as depicted on the project plan prepared by Paul Kobalka, received on February 3, 2017, and stamped approved on March 22, 2017. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) i Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, 4 I I Michael J. Domino President, Board of Trustees MJD/dd I i i �--,g-x 0;Z- z 3. 0,4-,,�. veil- G V// Pro or,. W4-1Ic w Y G 9SP,e P UY+ert j�, IVY //its fi yra 41 z BOAR OF -1 RU5 ES TOWN:OF SOUT !D .� DATE ,.a x- �• J.�r C O rt,l + 1-1 V14 n E il,tl E V E T FEB - 3 2017 W-Bade r Southold Town 4 Board f Tnls pzs _1 r� Michael J.Domino,President �oE SDUTy®l Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President ML 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Charles J.Sanders Southold,New York 11971 Glenn Goldsmith Telephone(631) 765-1892 A.Nicholas Krupskilif'COU Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Please be advised that your application dated FO 3t 0M-7 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of NA6q _{" Zz, 261 and your application has been approved pending the completion of the following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 1St Day of Construction ($50.00) J Atco ge- UVIr7 L,�ie&F VERIrIcAri6-1 �I�oW► (,Ua�. &wDry tN'14-Y' � / '/ Constructed ($50.00) -r kL., Wi000p 1,5 t5V T* * V Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) rogs-r STWW'a 1p G'oove _ , Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) 30-Year Maintenance Agreement(complete original form enclosed and submit to Board of Trustees Office) The Permittee is required to provide evidence that the non-turf buffer condition of the Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety(90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $ 'r-0'6 (i1 �l BY: , Michael J. Domino, President1��� Board of Trustees - SURVEY OF - LOT 5 MAP OF PETTY'S BIGHT FILE No. 5859 FILED JANUARY 26, 1973 SITUATED AT ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-14-02-23 SCALE 1"=40' JULY 30, 2004 JUNE 25, 2007 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE \ JULY 25, 2007 RELOCATED PROPOSED HOUSE O NOVEMBER 2, 2007 ADDED ADDITIONAL WELL & CESSPOOL LOCATIONS S NOVEMBER 24, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED WELL LOCATION ��. DECEMBER 3, 2007 ADDED TEST HOLE M DECEMBER 12, 2007 ADDED LOT COVERAGE JANUARY 9, 2007 SET LATH FOR SITE INSPECTION C \\ \2 FEBRUARY 4, 2008 REVISED SEPTIC SYSTEM M SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 RELOCATE PROP, DRYWELL 50' FROM PROP. WELL F JULY 16, 2UPDATE SURVEY JANUARY V 201515 ADO PROPOSED HOUSE \ MARCH 5, 2015 REVISE PER S.C.D.H.S. NOTICE 03/03/2015 MAY 19, 2015 FOUNDATION LOCATION JULY 22, 2015 STAKE PROPERTY LINES 4 DECEMBER 1, 2015 FINAL SURVEY y� JANUARY 16, 2016 ADD POOL EQUIP, WALL & CORRECT NOTES PER HEALTH DEPT. },kg \ 0� FEBRUARY 4, 2016 CORRECT WELL TIE DISTANCES 4�� v x1.94. AREA = 38,131 sq. ft. hq \ e0 (TO TIE LINE) 0.875 ac. \ \ CERTIFIED TO: \\\ PAUL KOBALKA �° MARGARET KOBALKA FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY F`F� \ ULSTER SAVINGS BANK, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS °J �ONF �J O N 19 .8 w o°�Tq` EXISTING .�• EXISTING --_ CESSPGOL �P'� /� 7' W*ArwY / 0 VIA yellr to w erR m r °ry HOUSF // '0004 04 / Lor 0)? ft y / ski STAKE u / `-' W Q$� �oo�k '7 0 / SEPTIC SYSTEM TIE MEASUREMENTS stio k / yQ HOUSE HOUSE CORNER []A CORNER QB LLJ $ IP swr°gPo 0 SEPTIC TANK 25.5' 34.5' 0 / COVER LEACHp�ChiH COVER ING POOL 45' 54' ci, i 0 !!PO O DDC p r� STFOp N0 ? LEACHING POOL 48' 34.5 .2 3r \gd 0'�.D � COVER 2 z1,4 2881. WELL TIE MEASUREMENTS 9p CAR Qf HOUSE HOUSE ° W W CORNER © CORNER[D Yi 1 ExlsnN �c wEtL Q$°a WELL 40.5' 62.5' o� u CQNC NON, �QO ,•�'Z`i' -�I S �`2 n'yc w 4 Rr1ye \ 00,0 cr\ ��a P o 26 00 `-'• r�,`o 0 o USE o Al 0, ' �lYq� ; R'4iENrlq°jS9Ep,V C,A.ry O,sNP. (�-,✓^^CCE�ISSPOOL lio n. I!'' q� ( R I c I �� R� CaryCc. BgT J1 F= [ is 3g, 0p s�' 3. 4 Tes• AS' 00.. '"till, T EXISTIN WELL �! "''' FEB - 3 2011 WV 00, O PREP pp�IN$AL'CORI) E j�T$ttE•.IdINIMUM piSHEDp VACANT B1'��L't',S.AND RSUR�IfrJWO ADOUPTE0 f03 FO SUCH USE B NDA 4EW YORK STATE LAND i AASSOCIATIDN 1 EQTES e' us .,`1i< , r::F El CA 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 DATUM ' EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103CO069H ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED � '� � � N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE fLOODPIAIN. UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO INS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF 3. COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE TAKEN FROM COASTAL EROSION SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE Nathan Taft Corwin III HAZARD AREA MAP PHOTO No. 47-655-83 EDUCATION LAW. COPIES THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARINGLand Surveyor THE LANDD SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SWU.NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY ' IS PREPARED,AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE i TITLE COMPANY.GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Tiile Surveys — Subdivisions — Sits Plans — Construction Layout LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON.AND TUITION•CERTIFICCATIONS ARELNOTiITRAINSFERABLE. PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1886 Main Rood P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, Now York 11947 DiSa -n U From: • Mad' 11 <madi111@optonline.net> Sent: f i� , Sunda , March 19, 2017 8:08 PM MAR 2 0 2017 To: DiSalvo , Diane Cc: I Madeline Droege; Simone Walsberg; Shayann Walsberg Subject: SoiltiloldTown from 885 pettys drive, objections to application for'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka I - BoaiilofTrustvs from_itnmediate neighbor, madi droege regarding hearing of 3/22/17 for paul & margaret kobalka building a 'bridge' on the beach &wetlands 1000-14-2-23 as I cannot attend the meeting, please note that: I object because it is the WETLANDS and nothing can disturb the wetlands or anywhere near it for the sake of convenience. It is the DUNES and the natural curves create natural depressions and we must disturb the dunes or as little as possible. THERE IS NO NEED FOR THIS 'BRIDGE' BUT STAIRS. A bridge would be for decoration and convenience, an extended deck of great length. it is an unnecessary. I looked at the 'gully' and have provided photos in separate mail and it is the same as mine only a much shorter distance to the beach.The only thing that has been approved for such use so far in pettys bight are STAIRS (NO BRIDGE). I have 12 steps/stairs and their slope is much less and need 6 steps/stairs.they need about 6 steps/stairs to reach the beach and they can brush aside the small plants to walk to the water, like me and everyone else here. no one has a 'bridge', 'platform, 'deck' or'boardwalk' . THE APPLICANTS LAND IS FAIRLY FLUSH WITH THE BEACH except for their perceived 'gully'.The gully they describe is not more than a natural depression in the protected DUNES.THIS'GULLY' DOES NOT COLLECT WATER.there is no reason to make a 'bridge' over it. other neighbors at an elevation have been grated permission to build stairs to reach the bottom of the 'gully'so they can continue walking onto the beach. no one has a boardwalk, platform, bridge but stairs. I have provided photos of my steps at pettys bight, I am the immediate neighbor. NO ONE ELSE HAS SUCH A'BRIDGE' ON PETTYS BIGHT and would never get a permit if they wanted to build one. if the applicant were to get a permit then everyone will want one and build one. where do you stop?this isnt nassau county where the beaches have been corrupted, commercialized and now filthy. if they want to destroy the beach they should live in nassau where people are allowed to destroy the beach. people buy into this area because it is still pristine, because it isnt nassau county. but the first thing they want to do is make the wilderness their own and clear cut it or build on it for themselves for their own convenience and decoration destroying everyones view,wildlife and enjoyment of the pristine wilderness.this is not a 'bridge'they are describing but a WALKWAY, BOARDWALK,AN EXTENDED DECK. no one bought into this area to look at a useless 'bridge' covering the natural curves and elements of a natural beach protected supposedly by the town. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CURRENT USE OF STAIRS TO REACH THE BEACH you will see that no one has put a walkway, boardwalk, or extended deck to reach their attached deck to their house. no one would or ever has gotten a permit for anything but a functional stair to the beach with a small access platform. if the applicant, and my immediate neighbor, were to get a permit for a 48' 'bridge'then I want one too and will be applying and assume I wont be denied if she is grated such. ALL THE STEPS/STAIRS that exist here REQUIRED NO EXCAVATION.THE STAIRS LAY FLAT AGAINST THE DECLINE.The applicant can build a stair and lay it on the ground with minor hand digging for fasteners at each end. nothing on the bight has required EXCAVATION. 1 A'BRIDGE'WOULD NOT BE STABLE AND COULD NOT BE USED AS A PERMANENT'BRIDGE'.the proposed 'bridge' over the natural depression in the sandy beach would not be able to be permanent as anything that is built on sand and is also too close to the water remains unstable.you would have to drill pilings and have cement footings into the pristine beach to obtain stability.this would be outrageous and has not been done on this beach here. stairs are all that is needed, 1 IF THIS PROPOSED 'BRIDGE'WERE TO BE BUILT IN A WAY TO GUARANTEE STABILITY IT WOULD REQUIRE EXTREME EXCAVATION BEYOND THE AREA OF THE BUILD.they should install STAIRS like everyone else that would require HAND DIGGING ONLY so the surrounding and outlying area would not be disturbed or destroyed. IF A 48' LONG 'BRIDGE'WAS BUILT IN A TEMPORARY MANNER it may fall apart in a storm and may get flung into my house.this past storm part of such a 'bridge' broke off and got swept ashore and came very close to my house. if it got flung into a residence it could put the town at risk for being sued for damages since they permitted it. THE DESCRIPTION IS NOT COMPLETE. it appears that to build what is in this hand drawing you would need to disturb a larger area around it which this drawing does not show.the drawing is not definitive.the applicant may FLATTEN ALL THE DUNES AROUND THIS PROPOSED 'BRIDGE'to accomplish their final build of achieving a 6' deep excavation into the ground and protected beach.there will be no inspectors present to monitor this build and the applicant may take their project much further without interference.then if they remove trees,schrubs and their root system, dunes,wildlife, nests,those (and the view)will be gone forever,too late to restore.they have not included a PHOTOGRAPH but a DRAWING.their description does not say how a huge excavator will be able to clear its way to break up the beach and everything on it. I live next door and I walked to this spot and they only need 6 STAIRS which my photograph (sending in separate mail)would show. even looking at their drawing you can see that based on their drawing they need 6 steps/ stairs to reach the bottom of the depression and then they can clear a path to the beach from there like everyone else here has done to preserve the natural land. SAME DECLINE FOR STAIRS: their decline is the same as mine.we are on the same ridge but I need 12 steps and they need about 6. THIS IS NOT ABRIDGE' but a DECK and decks have EXISTING RULES. and if the rules apply it could not extend further than any other decks on Pettys Bight.they have a deck attached to their house and it is already to the maximum space permitted for all decks on Petty Bight. this would be an EXTENTION OF THEIR DECK.this is not necessary and a destruction of the delicate beach front. no one has excavated, dug and drilled and built 4'x 4"s into a 6' deep excavation into the sand on this beach for a bridge so far. nothing like this has ever been approved. THE APPLICANT USED A GOVERNMENT AGENCY WITHOUT CAUSE TO DISTURB ME. I walked to the edge of my property and onto theirs to take a photo of the proposed 'bridge' because THEY DIDNT PROVIDE ONE. I needed to see what they are talking about as their drawing is not definitive. I think they should be happy since they are asking for a permit. I think I have a right, since they invited me to the hearing,to inspect the area of the proposal and to take photos for examination. instead they used a government agency,the southold police department,to harass me. I dont know what the applicant told the cops but they were relentlessly ringing my bell, banging on my door,walking around my house, looking in the sliding glass doors for no reason when I went back inside my house.this is a waste of government funds and it is illegal to use a government agency for no other reason but to harass someone without cause or provocation. for a 2nd time 11:24am,sunday 3/19/17 a police car is parked outside my house and came knocking and ringing at my door again. I consulted my lawyer and have been advised that I do not need to answer my door. My neighbor,the applicant, knows me, knows that I was taking photos of the proposed 'bridge'for the hearing she invited me to which took less than 5 minutes. what would she do if a beachgoer wandered up her proposed 'bridge'?what about the other neighbors who are looking at the proposed 'bridge'? THE APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED THATTHEY USE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND WILL CALL 911 WHEN BEACHGOERS THINK HER 'BRIDGE' IS A SHORTCUT AND WANDER ON HER PROPERTY. IT WOULD INVITE STRANGERS AND VISITORS to use it thinking it is a shortcut or pathway to and from the beach. during the summer there are beach parties at the easement which is next to the APPLICANTS HOUSE, and my house is right 2 I� next to theirs. during the fall Pettys Bight is frequented by fishermen. beach party goers and fisherman may think this commercially built'bridge' is a 'beach access'. then the applicant may put up SIGNS and BILLBOARDS telling visitors to GO AWAY. no one wants that.The applicant may call 911 every time someone checks out their'bridge', or install floodlights,which no one wants,or put up "go away"signs and there will be nothing anyone will be able to do about that. I read the codes on installing outside lights and the light cannot leave anyones property line. any light they put on on their'bridge' will be shining outside their property line. PETTYS BIGHT DOES NOT NEED ANY MORE DECKS, BOARDWALKS, PLATFORMS,SIGNS,ANNOUNCEMENTS, LIGHTS, CLEARCUTTING,OR ANY OTHER COMMERCIALIZATION. It is bad enough people here put up any sign they can think of without permission or consultation with the other neighbors.when I moved here there were 2 signs. now there are over 19 signs. meanwhile not many people live here and there is no thru traffic, no kids running around, no reason for any signs.we are all old enough and dont need a 'stop sign' on every corner in a subdivision or a 'we love our kids'sign, like we need a sign for that. the applicant MAY BE PUTTING UP SIGNS telling everyone it is their PRIVATE DECK, BRIDGE, WALKWAY OR BOARDWALK. no one wants more signs or a reason for them.there will be no way to prevent the applicant from adding signs as people around here dont ask,they just put up any sign they want without consequence because there is no way to make a complaint and have it enforced. my neighbor bordering my vacant lot across from my house destroyed a 'no trespassing' sign I put up (professionally and at a great expense) at the vacant lot after he started using his tractor to clear cut it and make it his free side lawn. I asked him not to clear cut my lot and he tried to run me over with his tractor. I put up a professionally crafted 'no tresspassing'sign and he destroyed it. If applicant is able to install a "bridge'there may be many other consequences like them putting up signs and lights. THIS PROPOSED 'BRIDGE'WILL INTERFERE WITH AND DESTROY WILDLIFE HABITATS, DESTROY ROOT SYSTEMS, NESTS, NATURAL WILDLIFE TRAILS AND EVERYONES VIEW. and can be a hazard to THE WETLANDS, DUNES AND BEACH. A NATURAL WALKWAY THROUGH THE BRUSH AND DOWN THE DECLINE ALREADY EXISTS AND IS BEING USED BY APPLICANT. I submitted a photo of this separately. madi droege 885 pettys drive, immediate neighbor to the kobalkas. 3 z DiSalvo, Diane From: Madi111 <madi111@optonline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 8:08 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Madeline Droege Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF SCOPE DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF SCOPE DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED Date: March 19, 2017 at 9:45:43 AM EDT Cc: Madeline Droege <madi111(Qoptonline.net>. Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF SCOPE DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED proposed 'bridge'by paul &margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF SCOPE OF DECLINE FROM PROPERTIES JUST EAST AND WEST, INCLUDING APPLICANTS IN THE MIDDLE. The decline is higher to the east and becomes flat land to the west at the easement. the applicant is in the middle. the ridge slopes down from where my stairs are at my house immediately east of the applicants to flat land at the easement to the west of the applicant. ALL THIS BEACH, TREES, ROOT SYSTEMS, NESTS, WILDLIFE HABITATS, VIEWS,NATURAL CHARACTER, WILL BE DESTROYED AND GONE FOREVER for the convenience of one resident if they are permitted to excavate and build a `bridge' to the beach and wetlands using the wetlands. EXCAVATORS WILL NEED ACCESS AND A MUCH LARGER AREA WILL BE EFFECTED THAN JUST THE `BRIDGE'. IT ISNT NECESSARY. ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. STAIRS THAT DONT NEED EXCAVATION BY AN EXCAVATOR(like everyone else) i v. e� i I �p .ter ,v A , m 2 DiSalvo, Diane From: Madilll <madilll@optonline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 8:11 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Madeline Droege Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED Date: March 18, 2017 at 5:56:24 PM EDT To: Shayann Walsberg <sha annd .icloud.com>, Simone Walsberg <simonewalsberg(D_optonline.net> Cc: Madeline Droege <madi111(aD_optonline.net> proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23 PHOTO OF DECLINE, ONLY STAIRS ARE NEEDED. I am the immediate neighbor to their east and we have the same decline. I had 12 steps and they only need 6 steps because the ridge slopes downward to the west to where it becomes completely flat. you can see the blue flags they put to mark where the boardwalk to the `bridge' would go but barely. (in front of the farthest tree on the ground) I am showing the scope of the decline. their drawing is not definitive. 4 In q �" +�mss,+e� �'�'; ''�`">'a °a ,. ��•r:°°'x` 5ta �� � a * �'� �, w'm, ^�` a4 DiSalvo, Diane From: Madilll <madilll@optonline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 8:12 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Madeline Droege Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo shows a NATURAL PATH ALREADY EXISTS AND IS BEING USED BY APPLICANT, 'A BRIDGE' IS NOT NECESSARY Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo shows a NATURAL PATH ALREADY EXISTS AND IS BEING USED BY APPLICANT, 'A BRIDGE' IS NOT NECESSARY Date: March 18, 2017 at 5:46:16 PM EDT To: Shayann Walsberg <shayannd(c),icloud.com>, Simone Walsberg <simonewalsberg(a optonline.net> Cc: Madeline Droege <madi111(cD_optonline.net> proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo shows a NATURAL PATH ALREADY EXISTS AND IS BEING USED BY APPLICANT, 'A BRIDGE' IS NOT NECESSARY. THIS IS ON THE APPLICANTS PROPERTY AND BEING USED BY THEM. 8 RSW d!w �i�rya w �°"' .a►�:� �a�� '"e `�! i' a ," ' ..A , �.,•r '^v..3 ' . .'_'*`tae. W... . a�!' _., .. .. _ .. .. _ 1 DiSalvo, Diane From: Madilll <madilll@optonline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 8:14 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Madeline Droege Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo of my stairs to beach immediately next to applicant Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo of stairs to beach immediately next to applicant Date: March 18, 2017 at 5:43:25 PM EDT To: Shayann Walsberg <shayannd _icloud.com> Cc: Madeline Droege <madil11(aD_optonline.net>, Simone Walsberg <simonewalsberg(u_optonline.net> proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. PHOTO OF IMMEDIATE PROPERTY NEXT TO THE APPLICANTS AND THE STAIRS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE `GULLY'. photo of existing stairs show the proposed 'bridge' is not necessary on the flat land leading leading to the edge of the `gully' by the applicant nor OVER a `gully'. the only thing needed are stairs like mine. I have 12 steps and they need 6 steps. there is no landing at the top of my steps, no deck, extended deck, built walkway, board walk to my house from the steps on the flat land. at the bottom a plank washed up on shore and I dragged it over the the bottom of the stairs but they are not even necessary and you can walk from the bottom the the stairs to the beach. these STAIRS REQUIRED NO EXCAVATION, REMOVAL OF TREES, SCHRUBS, ROOT SYSTEMS, WILDLIFE HABITATS OR INTERFERED WITH ANYONES VIEW. if applicant is permitted a 48' walkway and `bridge' over and to the wetlands and beach then I will be asking for the same permit because this has never been permitted before and if the rules changed then I assume I wont be denied. i n' €g 3 t , DiSalvo, Diane From: Madilll <madilll@optonline.net> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 8:17 PM To: DiSalvo, Diane Cc: Madeline Droege Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo shows a 'bridge' is not necessary on the flat land leading to the depression as shown marked by blue flags. Subject: proposed 'bridge' by paul & margaret kobalka 1000-14-2-23. photo shows a 'bridge' is not necessary on the flat land leading to the depression as shown marked by blue flags. Date: March 18, 2017 at 4:44:59 PM EDT To: Shayann Walsberg <shayannd ccD_icloud.com>, Simone Walsberg <simonewalsberg(a-)_optonline.net> Cc: Madeline Droege <madi111(@,optonline.net> the proposed 'bridge' is not necessary on the flat land leading to the depression. blue flags indicate where proposed 'bridge' would be going. there is no `gully' present where they intend to build here. outlying and surrounding areas of root systems will be disturbed or destroyed to make this a permanent `bridge'. if it is not permanent and no excavation would be required then because of its proximity to the water and exposure to the elements it could fly into a residents house during bad weather. barrier trees and their root systems which fortifies and protects the stability of the land will be removed and destroyed forever if they make this `bridge'. there are no definitive plans, only a drawing, and they will not be monitored. they could go beyond the scope of their `drawing' because the drawing in not definitive. their drawing does not show any trees or say if any trees will be destroyed. i x t' a P AMOL $ X 3 ,e elm—" :$ 6 > f4" � fi. 2 #."._ Michael J. Domino, Preside,, 0 UFFl7(/�CO (�J+ Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President ��O Gym 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders N z P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith 0 Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski ?� ® p! Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES J TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: -� // Completed in field by: -� 1 PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA request a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4" tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers, and 2"x6" headers. Located: 695 Pettys Drive, Orient. SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=q Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: 1 II Unlisted-Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: C'z 6z Present were: Bredemeyer M. Domino _Goldsmith N. Krupski C. Sanders Other Page 1 of 2 Michael J. Domino, Preside_ O�QS�fFO(,I-COG �� Town Hall Annex John M. Bredemeyer III,Vice-President � 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders z P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski ® p!• Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: Completed in Work Session by: PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA request a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4" tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers, and 2"x6" headers. Located: 695 Pettys Drive, Orient. SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 Ch. 275-12 - STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT MET=X or Comment=* A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town: B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation: C. Cause saltwater intrusion in the fresh water recourses of the Town: D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife & vegetation or the natural habitat thereof: E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage: F. Adversely affect navigation tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the Town: G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters: H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity: I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town: J. Adversely affect the aesthetic value of the wetland and adjacent areas: Ch. 111-9 - ISSUANCE OF PERMIT MET=X or Comment=* A. Is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location: B. Is not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at the proposed site and at other locations: C. Prevents, if possible, or minimizes adverse effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values, existing erosion protection structures and natural resources: D. :525% Expansion/Calculation Work Session Notes Application Complete SEQRA Classification Confirmed Coordinated Review Y/N Pos/Neg Declaration CAC: LWRP: Additional information on comments/to be discussed/Public Hearing: Date: Completed By: Present: J. Bredemeyer M. Domino G. Goldsmith N. Krupski C. Sanders E. Cantrell D. Di Salvo Other Page 2 of 2 Ie. tt OWNK1 _ _� -. , �C T•\ moi __-l-�- _ _ '—. PIT V Ill' 1 _ F� ;•, �t d r �r :R '(i".��j .'•.� ` � re73tkJ+�`�r�1 L ,, � 'irr ��•R ��� 1�' ` • „r s r u h; r 1��+$Ec 4�.J..'�({�,. � .Aft 11y':�it ���. " f '4� n,.'rv` , i,. , 7+"' r , v� `E'er: ( ' .." •s,•, "'� ' " jar - 1 \, ".��. �t ''f ter,} �..�, r.- 1Rf� \l, e , ;,i r! `r: �• i Y i-�, jr`.('�/ t,�yi,r+•i �+ t J •J �'' I / i- F � 11 /r'��' / .�� � i-��I'!�-�.'-,�t�F. >i = � I ,r a x' • F SWIM NNW.-- All ir •..: �, �. � 'w4: F j Vis' t �,� C fi.. �".�..� ,.x � {. .!'$� q� '� i • '.i„L�� +F @.at;•R - � • � �" . ! .. ��d'.. r. .'� -. d ■ s. �T' ,t j i ♦Y Rt % i j� .Y • �tS� �, ," zz S lrr fffff � . 1r i ~i1 �� •'. r - a _� r �, //` ` �� K' ': ,� #�r �� I w .� 4�� ���.•r- '►i, » . } JJ4j Y d j �r,✓�t: -..�"`ems. j �;�„/�.. �„ .:Y,e J, / R~ , 4 �rj�A •�....a p�, f .. Via•.{, �.+' -ti-1w%1 �,�r 'f. a • tit r' ,.�'[•t '��T t _ { T' RP = Z-7 Of � - �� � I �-�. I '��` r. �'-�� r gar •( ��. II i 1 �1 -66U --w-agg r. 77 71 7777,77� 17 M IAc) 'ah(c) IA(c) 15 12A(c) 1 A(0 /mONID- IIA.)A.) Mo 3.18 is JOAtc) 3.il e as 9 IS 11(c) 5jwc) 1 t 3A"( 113 19 5SAc) rn 11 SJW-) ISLAAD 115 �-Y-D 7. 938 5 1 IA(l) 324 335 S SSIC"\IC"\ 24 _7'l FOR ML NO 1432T O i0 SEESEQN0 ' 328 ONG) 4 SNC) .4 333 2D.2 I aw) 1113 306 305 21 329 117 20 3.30 Z04 LM(c) FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO FOR PCL No. m 339 19 SEE SEC.NO SEE SEC NO cl S. SEE SEC No 01504) 1 020-01-0015 Ix tt SAW.) 102ND 341 Y3 MAIN LINE RD W2 Tc 14 SEE SEM NO 019 SEE SM NO 019 is IS 71 SR 25 71 NOTICE C09rCOUNTY OF SUFFOLK K SOUTHOLD SECnON NO (21) Rea 1 Property Tax Servire Age"'y y G nwm..wu. ______ �a 0 0un0NOvutvPoMiO a9 i®iE0 ® f,0untyCentetRirwtneaE,NY,1901 013 014 WOEOi 014 Ote mq NO 100D --PROPERTY MAP 2� P A OFFICE LOCATION: ®��q S®Ur�® MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex `` �® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) eA ae Southold, NY 11971 • O Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 U01 LOCAL LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To. Michael Domino, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date: March 17, 2017 Re: Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coastal Consistency Review for PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA request a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4" tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers, and 2"x6" headers. Located: 695 Pettys Drive, Orient. SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is INCONSISTENT with the below listed Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with LWRP. Policy 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. The proposal walkway will be at great risk of loss from storm surge due to fetch of the waterbody. Subdivision beach access is provided west of the parcel Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem Tropical hardwoods are proposed and are not permitted unless it is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council or similar organization. The species and certification is unknown. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Peter Young,Chairman ti Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 '�/®1 �` Telephone(631)765-1889 Fax(631)765-1823 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., March 15, 2017 the following recommendation was made: Moved by John Stein, seconded by Keith McCamy, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA to install approx. 50' long walkway to the water. Piles will be every 8', 4X4 tropical wood, 2X6 stringers, 2X' headers, and thru-flow decking. Located: 695 Petty's Drive, Orient. SCTM#14-2-23 Inspected by: John Stein, Peter Meeker, Keith McCamy The CAC Supports the application using appropriate construction materials, no disturbance to the dune and natural vegetation and no disturbance to the existing natural debris. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried John M.Bredemeyer III,President _ Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 James F.King,Trustee ,, �" Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen,Trustee Charles J.Sanders,Trustee Telephone(631) 765-1892 ' ��v Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Officetse Only oastal Erosion Permit Application ; _Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension (1 E � ryT ��� {�- Receiveived Application:. t 7 Reced Fee:$ 2�� Fit i Completed Application:_ ( '° F E B _ 3 2017 Incomplete:, _SEQRA Classificat' n: Type I Type II V Unlisted { Southold Tom ; Coordination:(date sent):_ 3 �© l Board of T uste s J ZLWRP Consistency Assessment Form: CAC Referral Sent: -1 17 Date of Inspection: /y " Receipt of CAC Report: _)Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: 70 17 Resolution: Name of Applicant: F-44 141-yre f` Rob,9A.4 Mailing Address: / S fe ffx i ve 0V.en7Aly Phone Number: 31- oZ O Z/ q y6 C Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- y r "Z3 Property Location:_6 9r Pe t�Yl �riyP G}i p116, / 957 pro est 10c9telo4q Conom Ptff 1Dviv� o. (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: k Phone: } --Board of Trustees Applicat1wai GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 3 To 131 Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: S;�q/Y /f i'7i�Y Aox?e Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No If"Yes", please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? _Yes __X_No If"Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes _& No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? . �Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date �o kfholg( //2 u S¢eei, // A;. /6 -9 5-7o s sfci� e � ie�Q$ xhe 0/. ao •/4 ' i7ZZ/7 enc ins 1�.eltt,dP�R��GiaP No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked,or suspended by a governmental agency? No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): %'175��/� g- /on W*lkwa Oven a// tgMe w4P . P;/ef w'// Q enAl 8 0oc, yX y fro 4/1 aX: S'fr MT �X #efi6erf u- flaw deck;,r - oard of Trustees Applicat'�. WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: ello w lkc rf a veA gall O w4to Q �/ �p Area of wetlands on lot: O square feet Percent coverage of lot: _ % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? X No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards ,How much material-will be filled? _ cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area,of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): 111 0 P 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part I -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead'agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I -Project°and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: W4//(W4)0, Oven K//y _ Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): (� t�ys v Brief Description of Proposed Action- Indt.F/t j�pX any ►vel/�w�+y Ut,PR t�e��//y td �/rP w�t`r� Pi/el Wi e ¢ veAy roc t y�kY 1 .7 3(c®ZXG f'Eri��eys 9,YC AeWerl 7h,4- wc%c/Ciy� Name ofApplicaan,torSponsor: Telephone:`S!'zoI/ `93Ycj P,Q/ d- tUYgf}-ree E-Mail:Y,*k/Qy9V0 (;hilum,/Ve- Address: 6?SS 10-eWyl brive City/PO: State: Zip Code: 0_Y r e n�� _ /V 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that " may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. if no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list age'ncy(s)name and permit or approval: X El VN 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? p. fj Z,C_acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? I I acres e.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? --acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial EgResidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ F 1 b.Consistent-with the adopted comprehensive plan? —1 Z 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? El 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: - r [ ]— _ - tl.�l E-.--I 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? 0071 ("I c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? F Q 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: N14 ❑ ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: W*lkw*y OVA (.111y 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: a - p Al/y 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? IZ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? x 13.a.Does any,portion of-the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? � b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? (`y If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square-feet or acres: ��••.•�� 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban- 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,-or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? � 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES X 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, { a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? [:]NO' ❑YES Lnd b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: DNO YES Page 2 of 4 1 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size:_ , , El 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been°the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES , completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ('%7/ F I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE 1S TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE p J, Applicant(sponso name: ! -q/ He6��R�'� Date; OZ-0 —2001 Signature; Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the.following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1, Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? EJ 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action,impair the character or qualityofthe existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the (� establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5, Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate ty reasonably available energy conservation or renewable-energy opportunities? t__1 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? J-1u 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g., wetlands, ( "� waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? 1�-J Page 3 of 4 } No,or... Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? ; 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. i Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environme tal im acts. Town of Southold-Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date MJV, �� ��rn �1 rJ D President Print or Type Name of Respons'ble Officer Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Respoo l le Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 NUTIL 't: U- F Ht. A 'KING. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING : For a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'x48' walkway/footbridge over the gully to the water using Thru-Flow decking, 4"x4" tropical hardwood posts installed 8' o.c., 2"x6" stringers, and 2"x6" headers. Located: 695 Pettys Drive, Orient. SCTM# 1000-14-2-23 TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING : ;I Wednesday, March 22, 2017 — at or about 5:30P. M . If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 Michael J.Domino,President yi'�QS xCO Town Hall Annex John M.Bredemeyer III,Vice-President �i,�o G��p 54375 Route 25 Charles J. Sanders m P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,NY 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski '� pl {'f Telephone(631)765-1892 �l "� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD --------------------------------------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of PAUL & MARGARET KOBALKA COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE I, 1641 O�i¢l��,B— ,residing at/dba 6q5 T@4-1v& -Pri 1�FJ OrlcvLf M IN57 being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 13of March , 2017, 1 perso ally posted the property known as �5 ' da 5 r�Je.� ©,rti by placing t e Boar of Trustees official poster where if can easily e seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday,March 22,2017. Dated: 3/a�/Za (signature) Sworn to before me this 2/ 7day ofjyAA,42017 Notary Public DIANE DISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No, O1 D1475593 Qualified In Suffolk County My COMMISsIon ExpireS April 30, 20/01a j N i fru P e ORI ENI T •NYr I`1R57' 6 . Certified Fee 0.00 stmark C3 Return Receipt Fee u�l Y/ H�r pr�gt D (Endorsement Required) �d O Restricted Delivery Fee O (Endorsement Required) y. Q". $Ij. 11101? C3 Total Postage&Fees M5.•. r3sent neteTt,/ 1� � _--r ne .D ---------- -AFNo orPOBoxNo l oZ- ------------ Cdy,St IP+4 lAfV 11�577- Ir 111 ?,. C U95117 I f` Postage 7 Cl � �4 b`� Certified Feeso -,� 10 r I ," �/ Postmar�� � Return Receipt Fee $IJ.[I(1 Her 'Z O (Endorsement Required) t �� O C3 01, Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Req it@d)Er O f M Total Postage& 6 0` [13/13/2l�!1P7 � { S To. f,l Q es ina pes i�2m� -;---- � --- ---------- ------ . ----------- C3 orrPO Box No �e Geta sGu =�-- ON side:zip aJ s Ln D. ® . . -. o e•e Ln 111 tti ROSLYV y`Nyi= 15-76, 17,— Fj�AAIS Certified Fee $0.00 �• � flI Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fee $0.0101 C3 (Endorsement Required) _ 9 yqt Restricted Delivery Fee �f`a O - (Endorsement Required) a rr c" IT' $17• •�;' C3 Total Postage&Fees $ 03/13J201�7 M $6. Sent To t C3 r� ---s /. -------- --------•- ----- --- _.��' IM Street,Apt No or PO Box No .------------------ 1-7 --___-_-•------ f J�� ! V PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS • - �-�,f�� Ped �`�-r Name: 10 Please- 7 l2 wn - n / 5�� 5 e-s Akw o� -vim( M-Ae- 01-10ve— J �SS�S STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK residing at being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of_ ,20__, deponent mailed a•true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAILARETURN RECEIPT. i Sworn to before me this Day of , 20 r i i Notary Public I A J PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: ' na —Des Fina.�eme+r.joje (o© as� In -.ch V� O n )a.p Fn NJ 079 75 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 413 a r CLr o q residing at �p (� 7 e-� 9,iell, 1 JCbeing duly sworn,deposes an says that on the day of c 20�, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application,directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were availed at the United States Post Office at 01'4%e 1 that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL URN RECEIPT. 1 �j Sworn to before me this 1 Day of &4U-4- ,2011 Notary Public I j I DIANE DISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No, OID1475593 Qualified in Suffolk County 1 My Commission Expires April 30, 203 1 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH[CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS i i Name: / j Address: . � Mr. >� Mrs. JV I c_' to J IS 3 �f' sit 0.r' �a�Ie, Jar. • oSIy 1157 STATE OF NEW YORK QCOUNTY OF SUFFOLK I,I wI i Ate' r� o i ,residing at T e 4+4 r$ r;ye,,) _Qtl6it s 4 0167 being duly sworn, deposes iW says that on the 13 day of M0.rck 201, deponent mailed a-true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Officeat O r rcA+ M 1(01 that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. i Sworn to before me this Day of MOM' ,20 17 Notary Public I 1311AM ®ISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-SPATE OF NEW YORK No. 01b1476893 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires April 30, 205 J PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: N-ade,/rte, -Pr oege- PO 160X /6d2 f^/y STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK P4414 Mar 4ref oba!/Cq residing at �� Tg7 rS I"/de, 2 , being duly sworn,deposes dnd says that on the 13 day o A6 rcb , 20/7 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Or ,e n7`, /y y //9S 7 , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn to before me this 174 1 Day of 1KhA C,{- , 2011__ A 4V i i Notary Public DIANE DISALVO NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. O1 D1475593 iia U011f ed in Suffolk County SIV"Pilif IU10n ExWfes APA 30, 20 jg Y Board of Trustees Appl-icat"Ldn AFFIDAVIT �V L�Rr GI l �` J BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES ANDAFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS)ANI)THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALLDAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S),IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES,THEIR AGENT(S)OR REPRESENTATIVES,INCLUDING THE a CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL,TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO ; INSPECT THE PREMISES IN.CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING-A FINAL INSPECTION. I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY AND AS REQUIRED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CONDITION OF ANY WETLAND OR COASTAL EROSION PERMIT ISSUED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES DURING THE TERM OF THE PERMIT. fe'e,ff Signature of Property Own SWORN`TO BEFORE•ME THIS DAY OF A� ,20 Notary Public DIANE DISAIVO N�t�#-v PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. O I D1475593 6uallil9d in Suffolk CounfV MY Commission Expires AprJl 30,, 2fl � <, k APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATWE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM he Town of Southold's Code of Fthics nrohlbitsc nfl`ets of'nt test on thea oto n 6ffirftand 9e9m1)1ovec&The pmose a thiss to- rovide Inforinaton-w—h-1kh eat alervilie t o' 'ble c ets ofi teres an lln i to c' a whatex r' on i necessary to avoid same. : YOUR NAME: 104 4 l A-d I (Last name,first name,griddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee _ Change of Zone _� Coastal Erosion Approval of plat ____ Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other",name the activity.) W411C W4-X d j Do you personally(orthtnugh your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or emplayee has even a partial ownership of(or,employment by)a corporation in which the town officeror employee-owns more than 5a/o of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. iF s Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person '`i Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicangagent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. 1, The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): l A)the owner of greater than 5°la of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicutxt (when the applicant is a corporation); F) (he legal or beneficial'owner of any intemst in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); G}an officer,director,partnei,or dmpidyce of thce applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 3 da of �e 200 17 Signature Print Name #V 0 Form TS 1 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a.Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal-Erosion HazardArea. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si ificant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area which includes all of Southold Town . 3, If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of-the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency ' review law. Thus each answer must be,e. lainW in detail listing,both,supporting and non- sunyortina facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown:northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION ' SCTM# o 2L - 2,3 PROJECT NAME illr4w o veq fa//y The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees nX I. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate-response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) n (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) lJ (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: ❑ Nature and extent of action: `/8, J ' kd/1 lA/�/�<w'lt` o trC/I d\yc S,61"e P Location of action; Co 9s /p eHYT by;ve OV;eft ' /V�' //f f7 Site'acteage, d• 7r Present land use: S%.,slP A*.W;ly hole Present zoning classification: R 4/0 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: &k/ t-- ##ry"e( /1(414/kAt (b) Mailing address: is ?J- Ae ff yr (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 601 (d) Application number,if any; Will the actionbb{e directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ED No.L'�`f If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Poster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes,beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LNVRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. l__.!Yes [:] No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2® Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes,E] -No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No U Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of.Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary ; Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LNVRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ Nd 0 Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWl2P Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeF1 No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary '1 P WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes [_1 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes 1:1 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary — Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes F� No,,',V- Not Applicable ,Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate ,use and development of'energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. E] Yes Q No ® Not Applicable PREPARED BY � � �� TITLE DATE 3 ��