Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7023 1`13 1 dose.> Na16ZD17 r� CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED 9? ( ) Tape this form to outside of file ( ) Pull ZBA copy of ND ca c a � ( ) Check file boxes for priors 0. CLQ ( ) CD Assign next number on list 3 N outside of file folder o ( ) Date stamp entire origins; Q -n -0 rn � file number v x o w rn B o C) N ( ) Hole punch entire origins - Cn rn CD O o m o m (before sending to T.C.) a � cn n n < o CD fn N � — ( ) Create new index card � N z � v N ( ) Print contact info & tape 3 W �,� (n cn Cn ( ) Prepare transmittal to To 01 W o_ ( ) Send original application , o a' w Q (Dto Town Clerk P � n N ( ) Note inside file folder w/l o G 0 co and tape to inside of fold C ( ) Copy County Tax Map; hil neighbors and AG lots co ( ) Make 7 copies and put w ( ) Do mailing label 0 N W 1 P14 4-4 r App c'. LA)) !�E'�W ma jar �reIeSS LLC4iba-oo { rl �(• , In LS�n rf a, w irefess Yi'1�12v� Ca l�rl�cS *We 4,- cepYn f s� a�lG res(deAfza/ eesxvrr, E-2 G C -NO- tj 61�C3, SSG• sl d,P 0- S�CAOW4 71 1 t'`f"X /1 I a 0— (� /rso r 1 i.?,$ ph s,4e- Ptah v�� �d ,s���1 e� ���U� re � se-40-6 �� I NS �tS Ck4ld -- - - - - ----- - -- -- - -- /�`��c--mss©<e y �i�.�.�c�i�/�-.�o i,�•�r� s�7�A-c,� BOARD MEMBERS �QF S®UrSouthold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 0 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G @ Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Georg6 Horning 'Q �`�® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider l�C®(/ ,��'V Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEB 2 2 2017 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-906 So ofd Town Jerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16,2017 ZBA FILE: 7023 NAME OF APPLICANT: MGH Enterprises, Inc. Verizon Wireless PROPERTY LOCATION: 40200 NYS Route 25, Orient,NY SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated December 19, 2016 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 30, 2017. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to-this department, as well as the records available, it is the coordinator's recommendation that the proposed action be EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to Chapter 268,Mainor Actions Item(F). TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD: This application was referred for comments to the Town of Southold Planning Board. In a memo dated January 27, 2017, Members of the Planning Board expressed their support of the application with comments, and recommended that the Zoning Board of Appeals include a condition that the proposed location and height be confirmed by the Planning Board and their technical consultant as per Town Code. . PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Parcel is a conforming lot in the in the MII Zone. It is improved with a one story frame restaurant with attached deck, accessory one story and two story buildings, along with boat slips. It has 181.72 feet on Main Rd. (SR25)' to the north, 752 feet along the easterly property line' 348.41 feet on Gardners-Bay to the south and 1000.1 feet on the westerly property line. Shown on a survey prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger, PLLC, last revised November 15, 2014 and a site plan (Page SP-10.0.00) prepared by WFC Architects, last revised May 23, 2016. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Article XIII, Section 280-56; and the Building Inspector's October 18, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to collocate a wireless Page 2, February 16, 2017 #7023, MGH Enterprises,Verizon Wireless SCTrn No. 1000-15-9-8.1 communications facility on subject property at: 1) less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 25 feet; located, at: 40200 NYS Route 25, (Adj. to Gardeners Bay) Orient,NY. SCTM# 1000-15-9-8.1. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variance relief to install a wireless telecommunications equipment compound with a side yard setback of 7.25 feet from the subject property line, adjacent to an R400 Zoned NYS State Park, where 25 feet is the minimum permitted by code. The Notice of Disapproval was amended on August 24, 2016 to address the need for a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals and further amended on October 18, 2016 to correct errors. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Chief of Police of Southold Town submitted comments by email to the Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals, on January 31, 2017, addressing this application. He indicated that it was critically important that the proposed Verizon Wireless equipment be approved by the Board of Appeals. He stated that the local police participate in counter terrorism drills with other local, state and federal agencies; and that current spotty communications from Orient Point and Plum Island both by radio and cell phones would be greatly improved with the installation of this proposed cellular equipment. The Suffolk County Police Department indicated in their letter of December 2, 2016 submitted by the applicant, that they fully support the application due to the need for communications coverage for police and public safety. The applicant also submitted several reports including three engineering reports and an FCC Compliance Assessment Report which will all be forwarded to the Planning Department for their review of the site plan application. On February 15,2012 in ZBA#6533,the Zoning Board granted MGH Enterprises Inc./New Cingular Wireless, LLC variance relief to install a new wireless communications tower and equipment compound having a 7.1 foot side yard setback from the property line, which was subject to a condition that they return to the Zoning Board if, in future, they wish to increase the height of the monopole. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 2,2017 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law X267-b(3)(b M. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The surrounding area is of mixed uses containing a marina, a restaurant, an office building and parking used by Plum Island employees, a large interstate ferry terminal with parking area, an R-400 zoned protected NYS State Park which cannot be subdivided and two large residential developments across NYS Route 25, to the north. Any detriment is mitigated by the placement of the proposed cellular equipment compound at the southernmost end of the property which is the farthest distance from existing buildings and residences in the area. Additionally dense screening exists on site and is proposed for the new equipment compound to further mitigate visual impacts. 2. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. To function properly, the proposed equipment compound must be located next to the existing equipment compound which was previously granted a 7 ft. 1 in. side yard setback 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial, representing 70% relief from the code. However,the proposed equipment will be concealed inside a secure fenced compound area screened from the adjoining State Park area with landscaping and adjacent to an existing equipment Page 3, February 16, 2017 #7023, MGH Enterprises,Verizon Wireless SCTm No. 1000-15-9-8.1 4. compound that has had no adverse impact. Moreover, the colocation on the existing monopole will improve cell coverage needed by the community and law enforcement agencies and the Town supports collocation of existing antennas, instead of creating new sites in many locations. . Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. The adjacent residential property is owned by Long Island State Park Commission (Orient State Park) and has no residential structures located within the required fall zone and is the access roadway to the park with no access to the beach within the area of the monopole site. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. However, the original site chosen for the existing tower has not caused any physical or environmental problems for either the surrounding residential\community or the commercial community. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of new wireless telecommunications equipment while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Dantes, and duly carried,to GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the five page Site Plan(Pages T-100.00, SP-100.00,A-100.00, A-101.00,A-102.00, prepared by WFC Architects, last revised May 23, 2016. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Pursuant to the request by the Town of Southold Planning Board, proposed location and height of the telecommunications monopole must be confirmed by the Planning Board and their technical consultant as per Town Code. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Page 4, February 16,2017 #7023, MGH Enterprises,Verizon Wireless SCTrn No. 1000-15-9-8.1 Pursuant to Chapter 280-146(B) of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration, grant an extension not to exceed three (3) consecutive one (1) year terms. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Horning and Dantes. (Member Goehringer not present) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing / a� /2017 FACILITY: FCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS � .1 . o. 411, ;,7_y OWN"" &Vpq .3RIENT P INT 0 2 e .i 40200 MAIN ROAD, NY 11957 a � 1 tt 3 3j. g3M A R C H I T E C T S WFC PROJECT NO : 1 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETALIKET, NY 1 l 733 P. 631.689,8450 1 F. 631.689.8459 www.wfcaiax n-i SITE INFORMATION PROJECT CONTACTS DRAWING INDEX LATEST ISSUANCE ���� INITIAL ISSUANCE t•''`'�----CGh+ REVISION NO. 8 DATE APPLICANT: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 914 714-7371 VERIZON WIRELESS SITE NAME: 'ORIENT POINT 2" { ) DWG. NO. DRAWING TITLE d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS 4 CENTEROCK ROAD ARCHITECTURAL ) WEST NYACK, NY 10994 T-100.00 TITLE SHEET SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION: WITHIN PROPOSED 20' CONCEALMENT POLE EXTENSION: 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 \ Q INSTALL (3) NEW ANTENNAS AND (6) DIPLEXERS. PROPERTY OWNER: M.G.H. ENTERPRISES, INC. (631) 323-2424 40200 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 AT GRADE: INSTALL NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS, (3) NEW ROBERT HAASE SP-100.00 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOXES, (12) NEW RRHs, (4) NEW GPS CONSULTANT: UNITS, (1) NEW IOKW DIESEL DC GENERATOR ATOP NEW LEASING CONTACT: RYAN MAYBECK (914) 714-7371 A-100.00 EAST ELEVATION, ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 ELEVATED STEEL DUNNAGE PLATFORM A-101.00 ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS AND ANTENNA PLUMBING DIAGRAM 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 A-102.00 LIGHT SPECIFICATION 3/22/16 4 5/23/16 PROJECT LOCATION: 40200 MAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: KENNY UHLL (631) 236-2108 ORIENT, NY 11957 TAX MAP INFO:: SECTION 15, BLOCK 9 AND LOT 8.1 ZONING DISTRICT: 1000 A/E (ENGINEER) CONTACT: NEIL A. MacDONALD,AIA, LEED AP (631) 689-8450 EXT.1 15 ZONING DESIGNATION: MARINE II NO. DATE SUBMISSION LATITUDE: 41.15294 (NAD 83) PSEG LONG ISLAND CONTACT: SUSAN BRUCE-FEINSOD (631) 348-6044 0 3/3/16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 1 3/29/16 REVISED PER ATTORNEY/VHB COMMENTS LONGITUDE: -72.24419 (NAD 83) 4/18/16 REVISED 3 4/22/16 FOR FILING ELEVATION: 5' +/-AMSL (NGVD 29) 1 4 5/23/16 ISSUED FOR FLING ZONING JURISDICTION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD VZW PROJECT CODE: 20141122470 VZW LOCATION CODE: 311204 * CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NEW YORK ONE-CALL PROCEDURES BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION, DRILLING OR BORING. A a 1) ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CALL 2 TO 10 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF VZW CELL#: - PROJECT AND RECORD THE SERIAL NUMBER AND LIST OF NOTIFIED UTILITY ''b ` ` '.� NO. DATE REVISION OPERATORS. KEY PLAN: 2) AFTER CALLING THE CALLERS MUST WAIT THE 3 WORKING DAYS AS DESCRIBED IN NYS CODE 753 AS AREA OF WORK TO GIVE ADEQUATE TIME TO THE NOTIFIED OPERATORS TO RESPOND. 3) ALL CONTRACTORS MUST PROVIDE AS MUCH INFORMATION ON THE WORKSITE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ONE CALL CENTER. /�P FINAL NrF LON(.ISI,ANO STATF PANE'CCMMISION fONItNi BEACN BTATE PAItKI 4) IT IS SUGGESTED WHEN WORKING ON AIRPORT PROPERTY THAT THE CALLER REQUEST A SITE MEETING Mf1 � AS TO MAKE THE WORK LOCATION CLEAR TO ALL MARK-OUT CREWS. REVIEWED BY ZBA E � 5) IF THE PROJECT IS TO EXTEND PAST 10 WORKING DAYS IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE TICKET SEE: DECISION # BE UPDATED EVERY 10 WORKING DAYS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MAXIMUM PROTECTION OF THE ®�`� E® (Z /?� J aO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. x = nn-unrtr.N nares coal NnMr n LOCATION MAP KEY MAP NOTES QUALITY ASSURANCE Plum Nland Smimal 0 ea:a center--_ r i� '= A. Workmanship shall be of the highest quality and done b employees skilled in the practice of their trade. p 9 q tY Y Ort``'; `I''FerryB. All work which fails to meet the standard as herein described, shall be replaced by the Contractor, at the Contractor's sole expense, including the work of others01 ? � two damaged by the initial failure or the corrective repairs. rlip ( D Plum Wand A$,winl Di,,tnve Coit4:,r C. All items of work identified on the drawings by name, note, or material designation are new, unless otherwise noted. P C) 40200 Main Rd 0'a , SAFETY & HEALTH PROVISIONS A. The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Contract. P "ORIENT POINT 2" 0200 Min R The Contractor shall take reasonable precautions for the safety of, and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to employees executing the r :elmp s3hlnr work and other persons who may be affected thereby. The Contractor shall give notices and comply with applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities bearing on the safety of all persons and /or their protection from injury. The Contractor shall erect and maintain, as required by existing ' t conditions and performance of the Contract, reasonable safeguards for safety and protection, including erecting ternpor,;. barriers, posting danger signs and other warnings against hazards, promulgating safety regulations and notifying owners and users of adjacent sites, spaces, and unities. 40200 MAIN ROAD F°`r B. All necessary precautions shall be taken by the Contractor, throughout the course of the project, to ensure that: ORIENT, NY 11957 1. Safe and proper ingress and egress from all project areas will be maintained. Q TITLE: 2. Fire protection and life safety components within the projects area will be properly maintained. TITLE SHEET 3. Structural integrity of the concealment pole will be maintained. Construction materials shall be spread out if placed on framed ceiling or roof members. Loads shall not exceed the design live load per square foot. Provide adequate shoring and or bracing where structure has not attained design strength. 4. There will be no creation of noise outside the hours of 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM unless agreed to in advance, in writing,with the property owner. DATE: MARCH 1„ 2016 5• project area security shall be maintained in order to prevent unauthorized entry to the premises and /or secured portions thereof. PROJECT NO: 14-10823 ri 6• Water, Gas, Electricity, and other utilities as applicable, shall not be interrupted during construction, unless agreed to in advance, in writing, with the property owner. DRAWN BY: CPK CHECKED BY: TM 7• There will be no accumulation of dirt and dust. The Contractor shall leave the area of work broom clean at the end of each day. SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWING NO: SITE LOCATION NORTH SITE LOCATION SCALE: I" = 200' NORTHA" 00000 SHEET NO: 1 OF 6 NOTES: i .. 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO RESTORE ANY AREA WHICH IS AFFECTED BY THE FLOW WIRE FENCING WIRED OR STAPLED TO POST INSTALLATION OF ANY ITEMS AND/OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THIS SCOPE OF II II II II II II WORK. (14-1/2 GA., 6"X6" MESH) k .: II II II II II II _ ,>,,,,5fi`g,,`.. •,-_:."'` BASES TO BE SET 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SITE SPECIFIC SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH • STAKES (TYP.) ON'. GRADE \ BOTTOM OF DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI \ VERIZON WIRELESS PROJECT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE SIGNAGE. '' " '" ` (SEE SECTION) (SEE SECTION " ' CHANNEL OR SLOPE 140N OR APPROVED ELEVATION ) �. E�G� 3. ALL TRENCHES TO BE HAND EXCAVATED AND BACKFILLED TO ENSURE EQUAL) ATTACHED TO \0 WIRE FENCING, TIES WOOD R�`' THAT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE NOT DISTURBED. MAKE ALL PVC FENCE TO BE ANGLED SPACED 24 C-C, POST JOINTS WATERTIGHT. TEST PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ';; , a .:.. TOWARD SLOPE IN TOP AND MID SECTION Z \ BUILDING WIRE OR ' FLAN DRAINAGE CHANNEL ,) ). \ 4. THE CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF THE FACILITY WILL NOT TWINE TYP. 2 ;X 2 STAKES (TYP.) INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND THE USUAL AND ° TELEVISION OR OTHER q. POSTS (TYP.) N (TWIG EACH BALE CUSTOMARY TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION OF RADIO, ' COMPACTED �• �) )) COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES X i OR WITH ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES. BACKFILL �- 14 x 18 x 36 STRAW BALES I 5. EXISTING TREES, LOW LYING VEGETATION, TRAILERS AND BOATS IN AREA . S�OpF 6"X6" TRENC \ OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TO BE CLEARED PRIOR TO START OF ~=1 SLOPE CONSTRUCTION. RADE EXISTING OVERHEAD SILT FEN C -��i—III �Ii - - oo UTILITY LINES FROM 6. 1ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PLANTED TO PROVIDE A R C H Z T E C T S TIII�IIIIi� f GRADE \/\/\/\/\/\ - \ \// \ � \ UTILITY POLE #35 CONTIGUOUS SCREENING TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THE NEW EQUIPMENT BEYOND AREA. 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETALIKET, NY 11733 DRAINAGE CHANNEL �II�IL JJ I= - —' u�--• 6 PENETRATION INTO T(=�= s P. 631.689.8450 1 F. 631.689.84.59 1 wwww.wfcaia.com GROUN PENETRATION SECTION) ELEVN�TION OR SLOPE COMPACTED BACKFILL �� \ 7. LANDSCAPING TO BE KEPT IN GOOD/HEALTHY CONDITION AND SHALL BE REPLACED SHOULD ANY TREE(S) DIE AT ANY POINT DURING THE DURATION NOTE: PERIODIC MAIMTENANCE IS REQUIRED AS NEEDED TO FENCE AND FABRIC TO / s. �'•� OF THE SITE BEING IN USE. r=��" REMOVE ACCUMULATED MATERIALS AND REPAIR FENCE. EXTEND INTO TRENCHD f� HAY BALE DETAIL '• SILT FENCE DETAIL 4looe �', 3 SCALE: N.T.S. ` 2 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SECTION / s, d' 1. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION CERTAIN EROSION AND SCALE. N.T.S. •/ U�' '` �i p ` SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BECOME NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE " TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENTOFF-SITE /• � TO AREAS, PONDS, WATER COURSES, NOTE: DRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, CABLES AND ETC. THAT SHALL BE MOUNTED WITHIN A /' �`\� �. DRAINAGE INLETS, RECHARGE BASINS, WETLANDS, ETC. ACTUAL EROSION g n +� F CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE DICTATED BY FIELD CONDITIONS AS N PROPOSED 20 EXTENSION TO THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE, A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A NEW YORK STATE /' � F N�tiN� LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER (NOT` WFC). SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHOULD BE FILED SEPARATELY AND / ' Q� 100 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES, BUT THE FOLLOWING GENERAL CONDITIONS CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS.. ALL SUCH WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY OTHERS (NOT WFC). SHALL BE OBSERVED: CONSULTANT- PROPERTY LINE, TYP. O A. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED G AND NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands ' s REMAIN UNDISTURBED. WETLANDS DELINEATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: / B. CLEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO AS TO FINAL, MAP HAWKINS WEBB JAEGER PLLC, 560 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747, (631) /• MINIMIZE THE SIZE OF EXPOSED AREAS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME 732-7777, (LAST DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2014 PROJECT NO: 06-0099). SURVEY AND EXISTING -( /• <y0 THAT AREAS ARE EXPOSED. REVIEWED BY Z13A WETLAND DELINEATION ORIGINALLY PERFORMED ON APRIL 6, 2006 STORAGE � � / �d C. THE LENGTH AND STEEPNESS OF CLEARED SLOPES SHALL BE BUILDING �0 Gj�� /'• O,� cpm MDINIMIZEDRUNOFF°SPALL RUNOFF VELOCITIES. SEE DECISION # ��3 / / / ��. E. SEDIMENT SHALL BE TRAPPEDAONYTHE°SITELEARED SLOPES. DATED /� /� 100, �� P��1 \0/•/• �9Ik �. o SPECIFIC METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND Q 0 +� � �� / MAINTENANCE OF ER9SION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO 'THE � \' NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL". PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ELECTRIC (CONDUITS TRENCHED �� '�P 5� �./ 69 mac „ No. DATE suBMlssloN UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ELECTRICAL F / '' �' EXISTING c � 2• SEDIMENT BARRIERS (SILT FENCE, HAY BALES OR APPROVED EQUAL) 0 3/3/16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW METER AND DISCONNECT SUPPORT RACK TO PROPOSED VERIZON �`� �Ci�� ` ��� G 0�% /0 \J MARINA Q SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE D� FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK. NO SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL 1 3/29/16 REVISED PER ATTORNEY/VHB COMMENTS WIRELESS ELECTRIC PANEL MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ELEVATED �� �GjU,` O�ci' + i ' ' �r\4 p // / BE PERMITTED TO WASH ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, WETLANDS OR 2 4/18/16 REVISED \ / / e \� ' )) O�('j � �/ + oy !WL / 9�� ¢ +�Otc / ROADS. 3 4/22/16 FOR FILING PROPOSED 14'-0" HIGH X 6'-0" WIDE EASTERN �' �� s� �6 3. GRADED AND STRIPPED AREAS AND STOCKPILES SHALL BE KEPT 4 5/23/16 ISSUED FOR FILING RED CEDARS AT 6'-0" O.C., TYP. OF (9) I� / m I I ��0� / ►�'� / STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF TEMPORARY SEEDING AS REQUIRED. SEED MIXTURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOIL CONSERVATION CLOSEST DISTANCE BETWEEN LIMITS OF /• SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS. CLEARING AND WETLANDS / c fi2� /0 4. DRAINAGE INLETS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE /'• �' s �'� EXISTING / O,c 77 PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BUILDUP THROUGH THE USE OF SEDIMENT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT `'o i�i ® TRANSFORMER, METER { + �o /3 BARRIERS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, ETC., AS REQUIRED. CABINETS MOUNTED ON NEW ELEVATED , \ ! s. '>�'y Off' AND DISCONNECT �- / 0 d� h7 5. PROPER MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IS TO BE GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM. SEE VA-'100.00 /' s �' • fi � o� / � FOR MORE INFORMATION /' `" •�� ���' EXISTING RESTAURANT AND � � PERFORMED AS INDICATED BY PERIODIC INSPECTION AND AFTER HEAVY OR ,'' �� • �� .S s3 MARINE FUELING STATION �.�Y PROLONGED STORMS. MAINTENANCE MEASURES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT NO. DATE REVc,ISION �• �, //v LIMITED TO, CLEANING OF SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, CLEANING OR = REPAIR OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS CLEANING AND REPAIR OF BERMS AND KEY PLAN: EXISTING @F COMPATIBLE DIVERSIONS, AND CLEANING AND REPAIR OF INLET PROTECTION. AREA of WORK CONCEALMENT POLE WITH PROPOSED / \ / '�� / i��• `p" A 20'-0" EXTENSION / /'� 'LO9 ! i� ?� tij /+ �y 6. APPROPRIATE M7ANS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL DUST DURING CONSTRUCTION. or FACILITY NOTES 7. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO NFLONCISLANpSTATEPAR COMM6SION PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE DEBRIS FORM BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL IX�NiBEACHSTATEP BAl �` �� i•�ii +�� � � � ROADS. THE CONSTRUCTION + A) PROPOSED FEATURES ARE LABELED AS SUCH; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE E i •� Q� '` r,L SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. Bq / �� � � e / PROPOSED BY OTHERS. _ s %� s 5 /+. B) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY IS 8. SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL - / SSC, , •�� s" P��P -- UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL UPLAND DISTURBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY LINE ( -- - ) // MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO STABILIZED, AFTER PERMANENT STABILIZATION, PAVED AREAS SHALL BE x- �' o •���� �� �Q �(/y�/ REPRESENTS LIMITS OF q /+ GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE FUMES VIBRATIONS DUST ODORS OR CLEANED AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CLEANED AND FLUSHED AS NECESSARY. N ONRfDTATE500VEBNMENT \ P "a. 1 1 ) , • (PLUM ISLANBFACB,ITY PNOVFRTIT /� CLEARING, GRADING AND ,�� TRAFFIC. + i�•� ZL GROUND DISTURBANCE �'� 9. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTE. '-9" EXISTING N\0 'C� C) NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN SHALL CONFORM TO THE R140-_0,� , MARINA O� // '�' IS AN UNMANNED SITE. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NYSDEC SPDES o / D NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION � ) PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY. USE, AS THIS IS AN UNMANNED SITE. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE HAY BALES, SILT FENCE OR OTHER E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED s� NYSDEC i al Wetlan r r �' Q USE. APPROPRIATE MEANS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM WASHING •`� INTO DRAINAGE INLETS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN I I r / ,`Q' F) THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS THE PROPOSED SITE. ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW YORK STATE GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. r //�" Q FPG G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE 13 o r P` / �� �O MONITORING OF THE SUBJECT SITE. 11. ALL TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED MUST BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. + / d ¢�� + �� V H) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF PROP 12. TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT POLLUTING AIR WITH DUST AND AND NFPA 70 FOR ELECTRICAL PROPOSED YORK STATE PARTICULATE MATTER WORK AND GROUNDING. 13. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 1:3 SHALL RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL �" � 0,6 �' •� ^ �� Q�Gp`/ / STABILIZATION FABRIC. REFER TO GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND + _ _ LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION M r WIDE EASTERN' RED HIGH ORIENT POINT MOO2Fl < ��k 6'-0" 0.C.. STORM WATER RUN-OFF MANAGEMENT PLAN SFC' / NOTE: do \ A 100 T�'�' / SHRUBS SHALL BE SET PLUMB. REMOVE TWINE 1. ALL STORM WATER RUN-OFF GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED \ / �QQ /+ I FROM AROUND TOP OF ROOT BALL LEAVE DEVELOPMENT SHA!.L BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF THE 4 DEEP PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. �� / BURLAP IN PLACE, ROLL BACK 1/3 OF BURLAP ^. / 6. / SHREDDED WOOD (REMOVE, UNLESS BIODEGRADABLE.) ,,r ,, `' 40200 MAIN ROAD O J l 0 + CHIP MULCH 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY HAY BALE AND SILT FENCING PURSUANT TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE NY �� P°p�"��� ORENT, NY 11957 s ��, �, EXISTING BOAT 12 NOS: STATE STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL. THESE FEATURES SHALL REMAIN IN �OPRp s 0�� + LAUNCH RAMP ON ALL SIDES 6" SOIL SAUCER PLACE UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED 348' TO PREVENT EROSION. TITLE: 41 1. INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: pOQatiO s. o HAWKINS WEBB JAEGER PLLC, 560 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747, + , (631) 732-7777, (DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2014 PROJECT NO: 06-0099) 3. ALL WORK MUST CONFORM TO FEMA FLOOD ZONE REQUIREMENTS. NYSDEC 1'• //�ry0 EXISTING - ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Ida' + \ /��� ZONING TABLE LATITUDE: 41.15294 (NAD 83) Wet/ ands �/�\/ � • • � S39 /� /�i LONGITUDE: -72.24419 (NAD 83) �44 40"y� EXISTING BAY FINISHED %�\/ /��/ BULK ZONING REQUIREMENTS 280-56 FOR MARINE II ZONING DISTRICT DATE: MARCH 1„ 2016 ELEVATION: 5'+/-AMSL (NGVD 29) PROJECT NO: 14-10823 • DN � ENTRANCE GRADE �\�� • ' �/��� • v RS �/ // //�� REQUIRED PROPOSED TAX MAP INFO:: SECTION 15, BLOCK 9 AND LOT 8.1 DRAWN BY: EXISTING SHORELINE BAY �, \/ �' :• ' /�/�; JG ROLL BACK ,/� /�\/�\/ §280-56 MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35'/2 STORIES 20' (89' TOTAL MONOPOLE) ZONING DISTRICT: 1000 CHECKED BY: TM try BURLAP 1/3 �//�/���/�/� ���\/�//�// ZONING DESIGNATION: MARINE II \ \//j\ j\ � §280-56 MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 35' 694'-7" (COMPOUND) SCALE: AS NOTED LEG DRAWING NO: ANTENNA CABLE §280-56 MINIMUM REAR YARD: 25' 197'-8" (COMPOUND) 0' 20' 40' 80' A A BACKFILL TOPSOIL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN E E ELECTRIC°COND°IT TREE PLANTING DETAIL 0(X200-0URE WITH §280-56 MINIMUM SIDE YARDS: 25' 7'-3" (COMPOUND) 11 „ ]"1 00000 1 _ —T/E T/E— TELCO & ELECTRIC CONDUIT � FERTILIZER AT 1 =40 -0 SCALE - 1 " = 40'-0" SCALE = N.T.S. THE RATE OF 5 1 §280-56 AGGREGATE SIDE YARDS: 50' 250'-11" (COMPOUND) NORTH SHEET NO: 2 OF 5 LBS. PER YARD .,20 x,a•. ;: ::oi_. 'fit '' :.fi''i';'.,;s, ."•rva ` ";' - � PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE WITH (12) PROPOSED NOTE: DRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS, CABLES AND ETC. THAT SHALL BE MOUNTED WITHIN A PROPOSED 20 EXTENSION IS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER (NOT WFC). SIGNED LEASE 7/8"� ANTENNA CABLES §" I TO THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE. A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS DASHED LINE REPRESENTS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 3 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOXES AND SEALED DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHOULD BE FILED SEPARATELY AND CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS. ALL SUCH WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE O '... . MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME BY OTHERS (NOT WFC). PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP (12) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRH UNITS (STACKED) PROPOSED 292.5 S.F. STEEL DUNNAGE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM `': '., MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME WITH PROPOSED WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE : GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS STEEL STAIR PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 1OKW DIESEL DC GENERATOR WITH — — — — 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF LOCAL, SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOSED ELEVATED STEEL STATE, AND FEDERAL, LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS WHEREVER APPLICABLE. DUNNAGE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM (54 GAL. DIESEL TANK CONTAINED ` CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND ARRANGE ALL THIRD PARTY SPECIAL i WITHIN GENERATOR ENCLOSURE , i INSPECTIONS REQUIRED UNDER NYS BC CHAPTER 17. ) �k x X X X X X "x —�— X x X X �`�( X X X�—� X X X X 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITED THE SITE AND TO HAVE i VERIFIED ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. z (3) PROPOSED _�—..._.__.,--..{.. ..... .. _.. _ ..^ - _., -{ .,.�Y...,"_'-,.^-.....^-n•..----1...... ...:� ..w......_.._w..,........._I j. � �� 3. 1 ,- 4 �'£.N, ,: .:.. qt E8�'{.Y 1� O VERIZON WIRELESS 3. IN ALL CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR INFORMATION. FIGURED ` (n SECTOR ANTENNAS DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. RRH RRH = =T R RRH 11MDB MDB =�: O z AND (6) PROPOSED EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT -"� - � DIPLEXERS MOUNTING 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS PLATFORM I _ - ----- =—�— � A R C H I T E C T S AND JOB CONDITIONS, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, - _-w_ - - -- O WITHIN PROPOSED x � mm - '---r----�:--- ---`__..__. .__.____ CONFLICTS, AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY _ N LTJ 20' EXTENSION OF / I -:V.:...._. __.__. �__. _..___;" __._..;...._.__� - ----- � _�- _�� x 12.1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE,SETAUKET, NY 11733 EXISTING MONOPOLE COMPLETION OF THE WORK. SHOULD HE FAIL TO FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE AND - -- --= m _ _ _ _ .- ._ _. _ P 631.689-8450 E 631-689.8459 I I ww4v.wfcaia.crnn W ARISING THEREFROM. LIABILITY -_<-._-- ---- ---- - - � CONTINUE WITH THE WORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY AN GENERATOR ON THE DRAWINGS BY NAME NOTE 0 , _ ..._.... - - -- CIO -= - O 5. ALL ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIEDR MATERIAL I x Ii 9712 x 0- DESIGNATION ARE NEW, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ....___..__._.... BATTERY EXISTING CONCEALMENT 6. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE I IWw FULLY SHIELDED FLOOD POLE WITH I o a_ ° ° ° ° LIGHTS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED 20 -0 MANUFACTURERS LATEST PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS, AND WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE x WEATHER CANOPY POSTS , = -7-t == = x _. EXTENSION REQUIREMENTS. I I BENEATH WEATHER I FRONT 7. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD TRADE CANOPY. TYPICAL FOR (3). G AND COMPLETION. JOB ° " REFER TO DETAIL SCHEDULING PRACTICES. EACH TRADE SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADES TOFACILITATE �, 1/A-102.00 �_,� •------ _`. __._..._ _ _ __ . � •' _- - __ ____: "__._._.. .__.�` �..`t'_"'�`:�i:�":":`.�I�_..__....__. CONSULTANT`._` 8. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO DESIGNATE THE _.__ _._.. STANDARD OF CONSTRUCTION. ITEMS OF EQUAL QUALITY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE 1 ARCHITECTS REVIEW. 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ADJOINING �_. . ._, _ -- _. ✓ _ 4-1 REMAINING AREAS AS A RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED I 1 TELCO POWER / \� - - �" _ _' --- -_-_ _._ -: -�-_.._;._..moi_- FINAL MAP / \ SURFACES TO THEIR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO REVIEWED BY ZBA COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. '- � �- -�- � i � ix SEE DECISION #� 7Do�3 10. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED, AS i i 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 J t 1 NECESSARY, TO MATCH EXISTING CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR NEW FINISHES SHOWN. x x x x x x x x x x x Z�x x x x c� x x x x -te^Z— x x DATED ��lv Aoi-7 11. AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY, EACH TRADE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE 26'-0" FOR CLEANING UP THEIR WORK. RUBBISH REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE IN A DUST I,c x INHIBITIVE FASHION, AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS AND BROOM 32'-0" CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. NO. DATE SUBMISSION (4) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO 12. CLEAN ALL FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC., GLASS, ETC. LEAVING JOB FREE OF EXISTING AT&T PLATFORM PILES + x PROPOSED WEATHER CANOPY 0 3/3/16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION. PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH PRIVACY SLATS 1 3/29/16 REVISED PER ATTORNEY/VHB COMMENTS 13. EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, WHICH ARE NOT PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE SWING GATE k`�J 2 4/18/16 REVISED REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR RETAINED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BECOME' THE PROPOSED CANOPY POST, TYP. FOR (6) 3 4/22/16 FOR FILING PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND REMOVED FROM THE PREMISES. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS TELCO CONDUIT TRENCHED FROM (9) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS HELICAL PILES(f20' 4 5/23/16 ISSUED FOR FILING PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS TELCO CABINET TO EXISTING MESA DEEP/CONCRETE PIERS WITH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE PILE CAP 14. INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AND ARE NOT SPAN CABINET WITHIN EXISTING AT&T COMPOUND INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL. SUCH ITEMS' SHALL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, AND/OR REINSTALLED, AS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. 15. ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED, MINIMUM 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, AIR ENTRAINED FROM 4% TO 5%. ENLARGED EOUIPMENT PLAN 8" 1'-4" 2'-$" 1 SCALE = 3/8" = 1 '—O" / .� E �E NORTH NO. DATE REVISION / 3 8 =1 —0 KEY PLAN: AREA OF WORK (12) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 7/8"0 ANTENNAS CABLES ROUTED WITHIN EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE 2'-4 1/2" 2'-4 1/2"_+ 2'-5 1/2" _ _ RRRD IP aDba, PROPOSED TREES AROUND BACK AND SIDES OF PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS COMPOUND TO MATCH EXISTING TREES AROUND AT&T COMPOUND. REFER TO SITE _ RDRDI PUSA EYARRI mMwsmR IDR Rv r ur a II 1.Ar E PARA PLAN ],/SP-100.00 AND DETAIL 2/SP-100.00 r E _ PROPOSED 13'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH PRIVACY SLATS BATT I _ s z (4) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED WEATHER N V) CANOPY FRONTo) NPD RmfTATES CD FRNME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND 1OKW DIESEL I aUM 19 MD FACW YP DRERT w z Q DC GENERATOR WITH SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOSED PLAN VIEW `n Q z ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM J � W W Q 0 w Z ALCATEL-LUCENT EZBFo STACKABLE Jo PROPOSED TREES (BEYOND) AROUND BACK AND SIDES OF PROPOSED VERIZON BATTERY CABINETS SPECIFICATIONS: a_ WIRELESS COMPOUND TO MATCH EXISTING TREES AROUND AT&T COMPOUND. REFER z z n n TO SITE PLAN SSP-100.00 AND DETAIL SSP-100.00 WEIGHT: WITHOUT BATTERIES ATTE LIES- 2628 36 LBS LBS � 3 ,� ,z1, a J J Z Z Q o �_ w w ¢ EXIST T FENCED IN EQUIPMENT AREA TO REMAIN # OF SHELVES: 6 Q N z Z z BATTERY Ah : 100 Ah O > z z Q a EXISTING TREES AROUND EXISTING AT&T COMPOUND TO PER BATTERY WEIGHT: 83 LBS. FRONT SIDE 0 0 z REMAINELEV VIEW � 0 o N 0 � w CAPACITY: 1200 (Ah) 'W w w cn cn w 0 Q a � J( � �'� ` ^�k - ,'�, , r. : ' s COOLING: FAN COOLEDaroftpllp ` IX _Z Z o ., X r• �A,. :✓"C'A r ��.e..�,,. a ,. f ✓ 3F . ,., 's. ',C`<'' y, t I Ld Of ft: U) cn U) J Q ' a ?. :. XF:x'. ' " '. k' :. 0_ O W C� Ute .`. ...`k '.'; � ,�.: ' '. ''--:' w w Q kk ��: r: BATTERY CABINET DETAILS 0 0 0 0 1 -H cn a . �. . x , /.i Y N 11'' 1.. ,,n^ ,,. ", ;u, ..�R,qA,� .' y: ` ,. ;k.pr• r,r�.F:.' .?Yr LL LL LL_ Vl �'k.(`y.Sa`�.., +tlF .c• •",\' ':.F1f�� ''. .: ®ala,sem''. \ k k .k .r��!yJ��(�j�,,,p•� r w t'', tl: :�}L`.'`r''k�;4 T'w T kaK�;a X'�"- 0- o � O L4 c9io J vs< :,v ,#^ a`` :` :; F x. i ':;. :s ,; ,.. Rx ,, ,y 8 SCALE = 1 2 1 ,_0„ u u u u u u ' a r.., n h. N N , P r ORIENT POINT 2 J J J J J Q Q Q Q Q Q ' k :n t6; sr•.' d Y•� /y O (D (O O O O W 2'-2" 2'-6" 2'-2- 0) 00 it � I� I� � Vii: %;� �'' w } �• ��xy��, ' ;:, x��. �, > X r- 00 00 00 CD (D Ln 11 A .x �� J :4F 1�\, Y�`e :' a':..t 0 0 e ; d 40200 MAW ROAD ORIENT NY 11957 Stk?'gin Ys; if YtrF+a 'Y�P,8ie�2,'. r 'Boj'\ Q `i n=p.iztt 7U5�1R1C; I I I I I LT T T T T T E E E E E E E E E E E - o TITLE: 24 I I I I o ° EAST ELEVATION, U L_J L , o _ `° ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN L oma;-A PLAN VIEW // . .. EXISTING FENCING PROPOSED FENCING ii ~$ _ DATE: MARCH 1„ 2016 aag PROJECT NO: 14-10823 DRAWN BY: MC (9) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS HELICAL PILES(f20' OUTDOOR CABINETS NEW DEEP/CONCRETE PIERS WITH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE PILE ALCATEL-LUCENT LIGHTRADIO CABINET CHECKED BY: TM CAP 9712 OUTDOOR CABINET 180KG SCALE: AS NOTED FRONT ELEV SIDE ELEV REAR ELEV DRAWING NO: EAST ELEVATION 12-4" 2'-8" 5'-4" 9712 ENODE CABINET DETAILS - Am I 00e00 2 ,E 4 _ SCALE = 3/16" = 1 —0 "— '— " / 3/16 -1 0 SCALE — 1/2"=1 '-0" SHEET NO: 3 OF 5 ^'' ,��,,<` .;jp;;• _,,,. ;Liz;? ANTENNA MANUFACTURER: AMPHENOL GPS MANUFACTURER: PCTEL Antenna Notes A Plumbing- Diagram MANUFACTURER: ALU REMOTE RADIO HEAD RRH MODEL NO.: CWWX063X25G00 MODEL NO.: GPS-TMG-HR-26N (RRH) MODEL NUMBER: B4 RRH2x60-4R RRHAWS 1 ,x li WEIGH 0.6 LBS ! ANTENNA NOTES: ( ) 4-Lines -Antenna WEIGHT: 55.0 LBS � , =>;;,`,€ -Di er 2- ua� 1yX Electrical/ 11 6» , y �' w" 4^ • a =. 3.2" Antenna Variable Mechanical Antenna (L. 12.0" ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA Antenna Model Quantity Azimuth Downtilt Downtilt Weight Cables 7 106 50-PCS/AWS 850 - Cellular N/AX 7, PCS - EVDO N/A Alpha 700 - LTE C1NWX063X25G00 1 60 6 0 41 (4) 7/8" '° :3b'= AWS - LTE SAME AS LTE 3 0 PCS - LTE SAME AS LTE 0 0 850 - Cellular N/A I MOUNTING A' PCS - EV )o N/A BRACKET " ) 7 - LTE ' Beta 00 CWWX063X25G00 1 240 2 0 41 (4) 7/8 ,x .w ..,et. I AWS - LTE SAME AS LTE 0 0 � ' a ; A R C H I T E C T S GPS UNITNlor ` a PCS - LTE SAME AS LTE 0 0 . 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETAUKET, NY 11733 850 - Cellular N/A P. 631,689.8450 1 F. 631.689.8459 1 www.wfciia.com PCS - EVDO N/A 11" Gamma 700 - LTE CWWX063X25G00 1 350 6 0 41 (4) 7/8" I AWS - LTE SAME AS LTE 3 0 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW00 °' PCS - LTE SAME AS LTE 0 0 NOTES: i REAR VIEW I;�rscri r� eel » , I 1. ALL INDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO MANUFACTURER: ALU REMOTE RADIO HEAD (RRH) 7AC85P' 7A,C88PA MODEL NUMBER: B13 RRH4x30-4R (700/LTE) 4 i SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION. I WEIGHT: 55.6 LBS 2. PROVIDE DOWNTILT AND MOUNTING BRACKETS FOR MOUNTINIG UP TO A 3-1/2" O.D. GALV. STEEL PIPE. THE t MODEL NUMBERS FOR THE RESPECTIVE ANTENNAS EMPLOYED ONI THIS PROJECT ARE #MKS09TO1. 11.8" 7.5" 1 T----�- W� s ° f CONSULTANT: I 3. INSTALL GPS UNITS AS INDICATED. ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUIR VERIFY EXACT - """ Ills- ° '"" ' `"`"` ' �"" MOUNTING LOCATIONS WITH V E R IZO N WIRELESS RF ENGINEER. FINAL AP i 4. ADHERE TO MANUFACTURES MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANTENNA CABLE INSTALLATION (TYPICAL FOR ALL ANTENNA CABLES). _ . ooeo o MOUNTING r l Exs oral e PA �A I o gee RACKET EfEEFjE� REVIEWED Y ACS13PA 7AC8SPA. ! 5. PATCH, REPAIR AND RESTORE ANY AREA WHICH IS AFFECTED BY INSTALLATION OF ANY ITEMS WITHIN THE SCOPE e - o o ` " �� N e o o r' i i OF WORK WITH NEW MATERIALS TO MATCH, ALIGN AND BE CONTIGUOUS WITH EXISTING SURROUNDING SURFACES. e ag :o w SES �E�)S)O� �O e . DD�OIDDODDODDOODODODOOODC . ; 6. ALL CABLE LENGTHS MUST BE V.I.F. TAG BOTH ENDS OF ALL TRANSMISSION LINES WITH BRASS TAGS DENOTING o--- o oloDD0�DD00D000DDDDDDDDDDDD000 D €= - DATED-� �--� COLOR CODE AND SECTOR. FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW o . IoDDDDDDDODDODODDDDODDODDDDDoo i I i 7. ALL EXISTING CABLES TO REMAIN. F__ '` R Al'�S RSH 8. CABLE DIAMETER 1t7I RRH ,,�,• CHOW FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW ISOMETRIC RENDERING NO. DATE SUBMISSION 4 12.0" 6taW SECTORS - 7/8" DIA. CABLE (UP TO 100') fi°R' 'a SECTORS - 11/4" DIA. CABLE (UP TO 200') .63 LBS/FT. 0 3/3/16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW SECTORS - 15/8" DIA. CABLE (201' OR GREATER) .70 LBS/FT. MANUFACTURER: ALU REMOTE RADIO HEAD (RRH) 1 3/29/16 REVISED PER ATTORNEY/VHB COMMENTS MODEL NUMBER: B25 RRH4x30-4R (PCS) 2 4/18/16 REVISED PCS NA15 WEIGHT: 53.0 LBS 3 4/22/16 FOR FILING FIRAM= FRAhIE 4 5/23/16 ISSUED FOR FILING TOP VIEW 12.0" y 7.2" SECTOR SECTOR 850 LTE-C LTE-A PCS AWS GPS o 0 o e o ei ALPHA WHITE GRAY RED ORANGE PURPLE YELLOW BROWN BETA BLUE GRAY RED ORANGE PURPLE YELLOW o00_e o MOUNTING ' GAMMA GREEN GRAY RED ORANGE PURPLE YELLOW N o o e o o e BRACKET fiµ Looe o � �i: N o�•�o a ANTENNA DETAILS o o o < DIICDODDDDDDD000DDDDDDODDD ° ° w NO. DATE REVISION SCALE = 3/4" = 1 '-0" Deo 00l o Iou0u1DDDDDDDDODDODDODDDODDDouu �„ _ y�, IIDDDDOODOODDDOODDDDDDDDDDDoI 't�°��°� KEY PLAN: • ���� AREA OF WORK 12.0" FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW TOP VIEW ISOMETRIC RENDERING p A R _ �� -ISEA"O S=ATE PARK CQIMI3]INSTALLATION FOOTPRINTpovvk' W ��5� Generator H DETAILS INC 82201-3CA] * Ir4" - ii _I f ` vertical enclosu r e SCALE = 1 " = E Engine Specifications (cant.) The most efficient Power Solution for Telecom Backup using Diesel MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP • Ratings kW(continuous) 10 kW MODEL NUMBER: RxxDC-3315-PF-48 "M1l""ITE M TEf 00,FR"ME"T LPLOM 19.ANU FACRITI'PKOPEKiIt WEIGHT: 21.4 LBS (SYSTEM), 26.9 LBS (TOTAL) Description Output DC voltage 24-600 ( The Polar solution was engineered to meet the unique Combining our lightweight 8220 alternator with the 15.73" 10.25" Of Engine 3CA1 I power quality and monitoring requirements of the tele- heavy duty Isuzu 3CA1 water cooled engine delivers W communications indust Our DC generator solutions a perfect DC ower solution. It offers significant advan REAR C_njny. g Pe p g Cylinders 3 in-lime 15.73» SERVICE ACCESS oo have become the preferred.choice for installations with tages over other manufacturers'DC generators and AC / `" small AC loads. Since 1994 Polar Power Inc, has been generators with battery chargers. Cylinder Volume .9 liter the leader in DC power and cooling solutions. - • ( FRONT The Isuzu model 3CA1 is manufactured byYanmar and Weight(dry) 119 kg (260 lbs) 00 � - ° O O 00 N is identical to their model 3TNV70. di rn - w l • Maximum output is 10 kWN 0 m Coolant Capacity N (0 00 The Isuzu 3CA1 engine can provide between 10 000 to ►ri ® ® Q L • DC output (+24 or -48) N m f/ 16,000 hours of operational life depending on the qual- Oil Capacity d - _ / f _ � �� • 281itercs Variable speed ity of maintenance. The service life of the controller, O m wire harness, and alternator is+nfeCl over 100,000 hours. Operating Temperature -40C°Vo 72°C • Generator service life 20+ years p g P The enclosure is constructed with aluminum and stain- {AmbientlCompartment) • Very fuel efficient BOTTOM VIEW o 00 less steel fastners, then powder coated. We feature Fuel Consumption 250 /ktWhr calculated r r • Operating range -40°C to +65°C p (calculated) FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW ORIENT POINT 2 sound attenuation. - ELECTRICAL 18.00 MIN • Quiet Emmisions Certification Tier 4 g Our exclusive Supra Digital.Controller features fully au- PENETRATION SERVICE MIN • Compact tomatic voltage and current sensing, proteotive engine FRONT p AREA ACCESS Dimensions Lengthi:659mm 122.1nj • 72 hour backup shutdown, exercise schedule, remote monitoring, and Width: 454mm [17.9in] - - - o control. Extensive alarm options are available. Height::576mm 122.7in] O f -- -- -- r' 40200 MAIN ROAD BOTTOM The automatic voltage and current regulation optimally ORIENT NY 11957 I ,_ n•.r-, ;s powers radio equipment and recharges batteries with- °� � - MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAILS out overloading the generator 6r overcharging the bat- 33.25 w, tery. 4 MOUNTING w SCALE = 1 = 1 -0 BRACKET O TITLE: r 204 L(54 gallon) double wall UL listed fuel tank. ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS, 171 AND ANTENNA PLUMBING DIAGRAM o 72•' Very light weight and compact facilitating installation; especially at sites with restrictive space and weight lim- CROSSBAND COUPLER MANUFACTURER: RFS Lb ? nations, MODEL: FD9R6004/1 C-3L z ,l CO 32.00 l A supercapacitor replaces the;starting battery for high WEIGHT: 2.6L6 8„ 1 5" GALV. STEEL MOUNTING PIPE >: DATE. H 1„ 2016 i C I reliability. PROJECT NO: 14-10823 _. ... _._.... .. a (2) GALV. STEEL PIPE CLAMPS 1 ETL listed per UL 2200 by InterekTesting Labs. DRAWN BY: JG 56.2 Lq CHECKED BY: TM Visit our web site for prime power, lithium-ion batteries, (D N - L32"11" 50" ....... . ............. ................... ..... and solar hybrid systems. GALE: AS NOTED ........... ........ DRAWING NO: .Polar Pifer Inc. wIww.polarpower.colm Polar Power www..polarpowerinc FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW AO 0 API 249 E.Gardena Blvd 22520 Avalon Blvd Gardena,CA 90748 IDSA Carson,CA 90745 USA ATOR INFO Tel:s@1°'a3"- erin ra' '(310 830-9 2 DIPLEXER DETAILS I I GE N E R Sa►espolarpowerinc coin Fax:(314)830-9825 2 5 SCALE = 1 " = 1 '-0" SHEET NO: 4 OF 5 SCALE = 1 " = 1 '-O" " #;�� `sb:' •�;., ,WAR', ,t., `..�, �, BULL T2X^I 2N B RAE3 L 10 HTING � l i Project: �.�.. TYRe: 77-4 y l E t Prepared By: Date: s T. • t SSS """#a. :>.Sy: t. R` .a»','E">` .• :'•E {� . •<.,,4:" i Driver Info LED Info Type: Constant Current Watts: 24W - a [ 124V. 0.22A ColorTcmp. 4000K(Neutral) � -, ,•:€ <^: ;� :�i ' `.„' 208V: N/A Color Accuracy: 84 CRI ftt`'tk `<' ' `.i. € 240V: N,'A L70 Lifespan: 100000 ) a i 277V: N/A Lumens 1,664 1 A R C H I T E C T S i Input Watts: 26W Efficacy: 64 LPW $ € Two adjustable 12'N LED floodlights.Equivalent to 2x75W BR30thalogenh�ide floods. - Efficiency: 92% I I ? 12-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETAUKET,NY 11733 Microprismatic diffusion lens optimizes light output without glare. ' 1 P. 631.689.8450 1 F. 631.689.8459 ( www.wfcaia.com I Color:Black Weight:6.3 lbs i Technical Specifications ¢ s„-D A,_� Listings Electrical € Gaskets: i .',;C.:: v�- '�rj � r,•. UL Listing: Driver: High-temperature silicone gaskets Suitable for wet locations Innovative integrated driver technology with 120V Finish i TRIAC and ELV dimming i IESNA LM-79&LM$OTesting: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings Construction RAB LED luminaries have been tested by an `•- are formulated for high-durability and long-lasting 1 independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM- Thermal Management: color,and contain no VOC or toxic heavy metals. I - i 79 and LM-80,and have been received the d 1 Superior heal sinking with external Air-Flow[ins Green Technology: � ' Department of Energy'Lighting Facts"label. l LED Characteristics Housing: Mercury and UV free,and RoHS compliant.Polyester ( „• T_N € — powder coat finis) formulated without the use of VOC Die-cast aluminum housing,lens frame and mounting NSULTANT:+ LEDs: plate 9 or taxis heavy metals. Multi-chip,high-output,longdife LEDs Otherl FINAL y/il A P Reflector: �►/�/ Lifespan: California Title 24: i Semi-specular,vacuum-metalized polycarbonate .y, , 100,000-Hour LED lifespan based on IES LM-80 Lens: BULLET2x12 comp'ieswith 2013 California Title 24 REVIEWEDBY �y € results and TM-21 Calculation building and electrical codes as a residential outdoor " = Microprismatic diffusion lens for smooth and even light lighting fixture with no additional hardware required SEE D E`�w 7 l O N Color Stability: distribution and as a commercial outdoor non-pole-mounted fixture 1 LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more Mounting: s 30 Watts when used with a photosensor control. than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Select catalog numberto order a photosensor. DATED Color Uniformity' Heavy-duty mounting arm with"0"ring seal and Warranty: p stainless steel screws l RAB's range of CCT(Correlated Color Temperature) RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from follows the guidelines of the American National defects in materials and workmanship for a period of Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end user: Solid State Lighting(SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377- including coverage of light output,color stability,driver 2011, performance and fixture finish. NO. DATE SUBMISSION 0 3/3/16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 1 3/29/16 REVISED PER ATTORNEYNHB COMMENTS 2 4/18/16 REVISED 3 4/22/16 FOR FILING 4 5/23/16 ISSUED FOR FILING Need help"Teeh help line:(E88)RAB-1000 Email:salesfarabweb,com Wr~Gs:te'www,rabwab.com Pan,;1 of 2 Copyright`„2014 RAB Lighting lnr,"All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject t.7 mange at any time without nov€,e NO. DATE REVISION KEY PLAN: AREA OF WORK BU LLET212NB RAM L I G H T I N G I Dimensions i Features I } t 141/2 a $ Two adjustable 12W LED floodlights £ pE N?LONG ISLAM:STATE PARA COMMIsf10N f{(( 6(7 mm I 1 } MWNT REACH TTATE PARA (� I i Equivalent to 2x75W BR301halogen/wide floods gSS n 3 E t--l l �mm--t } Microprismatic diffusion lens optimizes light output without glare i o g 100,000-hour LED Lifespan Z — P I PP UL'IF fS;u/)' ` I 1 ONIfEO ST ATFs ETFRNN.nT E 152 mm ! ) fl IIM IH.ANOFA(R IIS P.6—A) i I i € i i 171 mm g Ordering Matrix i Family Heads Watts Calor Temp Finish # ...,_..,,. ...BULLET .�. . ...._�„...,..-... ...w., .,.w....,<.,....».. ,,_.,>v.. ..�.s..,..w._...,,_..,,.�ro...... .�.,_... ., .-,.K....x ...,.,..,. .......,,..,,,. 1 ! � ' i 2x=2 Heads 12=12W Y=3000K(Warm) A=Bronze B=Black V G,:;l (Dn i VG=Verde Green l W=White t a "ORIENT POINT 2" c� 40200 MAIN ROAD 10, ORIENT, NY 11957 TITLE: LIGHT SPECIFICATION DATE: MARCH 1„ 2016 PROJECT NO: 14-10823 DRAWN BY: JG CHECKED BY: TM SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWING NO: Beed help?Tech help line:(888)RAB-1000 Email:sates@rabweb.com Website:www.rabweb,com Page 2 of 2 Copyright`.^2314 RAB Llgs1ing Inc.All Rights RE-erved Note:Specifications are subject to change at anytime vrithCut notice 02 * 00 LIGHTING SPECIFICATION 1 SHEET NO: 5 OF 5 SCALE = N.T.S. I N W4 E S MAIN ROAD (S.R 25) ( 66') V_ 181 72' N87'09'20"E rF 420"/- 67 0 14- m > .... 0 M 0 62 C2 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 G—ToR C --R ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1-0. 77V 2Ty y .—R 0 I—E I TV ronu I—ILI —ET— PAVE -57 T. E MONOPOLE DETAIL 1120' s6 L- 111-1111E —D 56 47' =S=- —11NK F1.111—URE P 71 67 74 "" vuirov°ueni�ii* 71 B0 xs .77 .7 -71 S87-09120'W 30 00' c O NOTES 1)ELEVATIONS NAVD88 2)PILINGS INSIDE MARINA NOT INDICATED 3)FLOOD ZONES EXTRAPOLATED FROM F E M A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP#88 OF 1026, MAP#36103C0088 H DATED SEPTEMBER 25,2009 °a 4)HEIGHT OF TOWER FROM TOP OF CONCRETE BASE IS 69 8' 0 UNDER CONSTRUCTION MONOPOLE. z RELATED STRUCTURES.&MECHANICALS 0 ON JUNE 29TH,2014 T 0 1 SHEET NO* PROJECT PROJECT Na 06-0099 1 FILE Na m DAIIE, NOVEMBER 2014 1 SCALE: 1*=49 HAWKINS WEBB JAEGER PLLC z FINAL SURVEY OF > DESIGNED BY. MONOPOLE AND EQUIPMENT DRAWN BY' MSIKWJDIKD I CKD BY Ms Mc ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS SURVEYORS-PLANNERS (ORIENT POINT MARINA,40200 MAIN ROAD) REVISED: SURVEY UPDATED 7-2-2009,FB 529,P 1-2(FB 493,P 20-22 SURVEY 560 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELMU NY.11747 ORIGINALLY PERFORMED 4-6-2006)ELEVATIONS UPDATED TO NAVD88 10-27-2011 ESTAB 1872 PHONE(631)732-7777.FACSIMILE(631)732-7760 SITE AREA=464A RESFI A�SURVEY PF MONOPOLE AND EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 11-15-2014 G) SITUATE AT ORIENT POINT SO HOLD.NY iC.TAX MAP Nm 1000•iS9-81 zno tom- „o, VA61A COUNTY OF SUFFOLK b + DEC 2 7 20S aOK I��7(I ZONING F9bAEtD OF APPEALS Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Department of Economic Development and Planning Theresa Ward Division of Planning Commissioner and Environment December 19, 2016 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to the'Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number MGH Enterprises Inc./Verizon Wireless #7023 Huettenmoser, Mary&James #7024 LaValle, Areti #7026 Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning Theodore R. Klein Principal Planner TRK/cd H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 (631)853-5191 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NEW YORK DEWPAR��Fa p �C POLICE DEPARTMENT ''a� TIMOTHY D. SINI POLICE COMMISSIONER December 2, 2016 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Dear Zoning Board of Appeals Members: The Suffolk County Police Department utilizes Verizon Wireless service for police and public safety communications in the Town of Southold. However, due to Verizon Wireless' lack of coverage in certain areas, including the Orient area,there is an urgent need for a new Verizon Wireless communication facility to provide reliable wireless service. We have been advised that Verizon Wireless filed an application with this Board for a proposed wireless facility to be located on the Orient by the Sea Marina and Restaurant property, at 40200 Main Road in Orient. The Suffolk County Police Department fully supports this application, and requests that the application be expedited,to the greatest extent possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, William D. Okula, Sgt. 136 Police Technology Bureau Suffolk Co un Police Department $40L1,5_70J ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEME AG Y Visit us online at: www.suffolkpd.org r Crime Stoppers Confidential Tip Hotline: 1-800-220-TIPS ► .. r" Non-Emergencies Requiring Police Response-Dial: (631) 852-COPS ,� 30 Yaphank Avenue, Yaphank, New York 11980—(631) 852-6000 �O FFICE LOCATION: � SOUjyO MAILING ADDRESS: �b OTown Hall Annex �� l0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) G -h V Southold, NY 11971 �p Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 0UNTl,�� LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -71D4.75 RECEIVED JAN 112017 MEMORANDUM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Date January 30, 2017 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref MGH ENTERPRISES, INC.,VERIZON WIRELESS #7023 SCTM# 1000-15-9-8.1 MGH ENTERPRISES, INC.,VERIZON WIRELESS #7023 - Request for a Variance under Article XIII, Section 280-56; and the Building Inspector's October 18, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to collocate a wireless communications facility on subject property at: 1) less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 25 feet; located, at: 40200 NYS Route 25, (Adj. to Gardeners Bay) Orient, NY. SCTM# 1000-15-9-8.1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the action is EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to Chapter 268, Minor Actions item (F): F. Granting of individual setback, lot line and lot area variances, except in relation to a regulated natural feature or a bulkhead or other shoreline defense structure or any activity within the CEHA; Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney - Ll,r",_ .Q yv��Q4,Q o me du &t4,,o !)z-7)1-7 MAILING ADDRESS: `- ` PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OF SO(/�y® P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �1 Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS G @ Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH (cor.MYoungs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR ®lyC®U Souu h d, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM 0G�II To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson JAN 2 7 2017 Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals �� D o23 From: Donald J. Wilcenski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Date: January 27, 2017 Re: Request for Comments for Verizon Wireless at MGH Enterprises SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 ZBA#7023 The Planning Board has reviewed your request for comments for the above-referenced co- location with a new wireless equipment compound at less than the minimum side yard setback of 25' (7'3"proposed) and supports the variance with the following comments: • Pursuant to §280-70(D)(1) of the Town Code,the location of the proposed wireless equipment compound and co-location on an existing antenna support structure or other structures on other property in the Town is second on the list of priority siting's for wireless communication facilities; • The proposed equipment compound is adjacent to an R-400 zoned parcel (NYS Park) which cannot be subdivided and is protected as a Public State Park. Additionally, dense screening exists on site and is proposed for the new equipment compound to mitigate visual impact; • The application proposes two (2) 10' pole extensions with Verizon to occupy the top spot. As part of site plan approval and special exception pursuant to §280-71(B)(2)(b), any application with a proposed extension beyond the first 10 feet shall require special exception review and approval by the Planning Board. The applicant will need to provide evidence that the proposed height, as requested, is the lowest necessary to meet coverage needs and that the pole is structurally designed to meet a smaller fall zone (amongst other considerations/standards); We respectfully request that the Zoning Board include a condition that the proposed location and height must be confirmed by the Planning Board and their technical consultant as per Town Code. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments, and please feel free to call us with any questions. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM NO. 3 F NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 23, 2016 AMENDED: August 24, 2016 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 18, 2016 TO: Amato Law Group, PLLC (Verizon Wireless) 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City, NY 11530 Please take notice that your application dated April 29, 2016 s� rtECEIVED For permit for a co-location on an existing wireless facility at Location of property: 40200 Route 25, Orient, NY ®F ppPF.AL� TONING BOARD County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 15 Block 9 Lot 8.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed co-location is permitted pursuant to site plan approval from the Southold Planning Board. Furthermore, the associated accessory equipment is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 280-56,which states, "No building shall be used and no buildinp, or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MH District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk Schedule requires a minimum side yard setback of 25 feet According to the proposal, the equipment will have a setback of 7.3 feet. T otice ended on August 24 2016 to address the need for a variance from the Zoning Board eals d further amended on October 18 2016 to correct errors. Autho d Signature CC: file, planning, z a Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Fee:$ Filed By. Assignment No. RECEII VED APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALEEC m 3 2016 AREA VARIANCE House No.40200 Street Main Road Hamlet Orient ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SCTM 1000 Section15_Block 9 Lot(s)8 1 Lot Size 4.7 acres Zone Marine I l Z(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED May 23. 2016 and BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED March 1, 2016, and. amended Octobenj 8, 2016 issued for filing on May 23, 2016 Owner(s):M.G.H.Enterprises Inc Applicant/Lessee-New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Applicant/Lessee's Mailing Address:c/o Amato Law Group,PLLC,666 Old Country Road,Suite 901,Garden City,New York 11530 Ap licant/Lessee's Teiephone:(516)227-6363 Fax:(516)227-6367 Email:dvista@amatofirm.com NOTE:In addition to the above,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect, builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Denise Vista,Esq.,of Name of Representative:Amato Law Group,PLLC for( )Owner(X)Other:Applicant/Lessee Address:666 Old Country Road,Suite 901,Garden City,New York 11530 Telephone:(516)227-6363 Fax:(516)227-6367 Email:dvista@amatofirm.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (X)Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHERFYhI6"IIhLD ed G INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATEDfor fling on May 23.2016 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED April 29,2016 FOR: ()o Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: xill Section: 280-56 Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (X)A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Other' A prior appeal(X)has, ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this property,UNDER Appeal No(s).4905,5939,6533 Year(s). 2000-2001,2005-2010,2011-2012..(Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our officefor assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# Orient By The Sea Marina/MGH Enterprises 4905 New Cingular Wreless PCS,LLC/MGH Enterprises 5939 New Cingular Wireless PCS,LLC/MGH Enterprises 6633 i s , REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's a signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: Please see Petition enclosed herewith 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance,because: Please see Petition enclosed herewith. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: Please see Petition enclosed herewith. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: RECEIVED Please see Petition enclosed herewith DEC 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes,or {x}No Why: Please see Petition enclosed herewith Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? { }No {X} Yes(please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. New YorkSM Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless B Signatthlf,of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent ust submit written Authorization from Owner) qq� Name John [Malden Swor&to before me this/V I day Title- Senior Engineer-Equipment of &(-bbC9 2016 J. .%.oa® Notary bl ® !! 0i R16229645 i QUALIFIED IN ® iSUFFOLK COUNTY: COMM.EXP (P 101181208.. � 4 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Venzon Wireless DATE PREPARED: RECEIVED 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas DEC — '2 2016 Please describe areas being removed: N/A __ .,D WAV-P-MS II. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: N/A Dimensions of new second floor: N/A Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): 13'-0„(fence/canoes and 89'-0"(monopole extension) Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: N/A III. Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations:The existing AT&T communication facility consists of a 69'-0"agl concealed monopole with wireless communication antennas located therein.and an associated communications equipment area Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: Verizon Wireless is proposing to extend the monopole by 20'-0" making the top height 89'-0"ad install three wireless communication antennas therein and install associated communications equipment and an emergency generator on an elevated equipment platform within Verizon Wireless'443 square foot equipment compound. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 3,924 square feet Proposed increase of building coverage: 0.17% Square footage of your lot: 4 7 acres Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: Existing:1.93% Proposed.2.10% V. Purpose of New Construction: Verizon Wireless is proposing to collocate a public utility wireless communication facility on the property. VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded, marsh area,etc.)on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): The land is generally flat and does not relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 1 ' QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION RECEIVED A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? DEC 2 2016 Yes x No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? Yes 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area?Yes 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Yes Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees:No application required and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. NYSDEC Permit Issued 8/25/2016 D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? No E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? No Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel restaurant marina,and public utility wireless communication facility and the proposed use public utility wireless communication facility . (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Bv: kA�A= p • 10/21/2016 Autfforized signature and Date Name: John Walden Title: Senior Engineer-Equipment AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DEC 2 2016 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -70NING 130ARD OF APPEALS WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Venzon Wireless 2. Address of Applicant:c/o Amato Law Group,PLLC,666 Old Country Road,Suite 901,Garden City,New York 11530 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant):M G H Enterprises,Inc 4. Address of Land Owner:40200 Main Road Orient New York 11957 5. Description of Proposed Project:Verizon Wireless is proposing to collocate a public utility wireless communication facility. 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number)40200 Main Road Orient:SCTM#1000-15-9-8 1 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {x} No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {x} No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please ur the back of this page if there are additional property owners) // Dy10 21 2016 Sign re of Applicant Date Note: Name: John Walden Title: Senior Engineer-Equipment 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. � I Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1-Project and Setting ��a Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Proposed New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Communications Facility-Orient Point 2 Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 40200 Main Road,hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold,Suffolk County(SCTM#:1000-15-9-8.1)(see attached site location map) Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): See Attachment RECEIVED �Ec 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEPLS Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:See project contact below New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless E-Mail: See project contact below Address: 4 Centerock Road City/PO: State: Zip Code: West Nyack New York 10994 I Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:516-227-6363 Denise Vista,Esq.,Amato Law Group,PLLC E-Mail:dvista@amatofirm.com Address: 666 Old Country Road,Suite 901 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Garden City New York 11530 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: (631)323-2424 M.G.H.Enterprises,Inc. E-Mail: Address: 40200 Main Road City/PO: State: New York Zip Code: 11957 Orient i Page 1 of 13 1 1 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, ❑YesmNo or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village Oyes❑No Town of Southold Planning Board-Site Plan Planning Board or Commission c.City Council,Town or ❑YesONo Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies Oyes❑No Town of Southold Building Department-Building Permit RECEIVED j I e.County agencies ❑YesONo j DEC 2 2016 f.Regional agencies ❑YesmNo I 7nNITN(-, BOARD OF APPEALS g.State agencies mYes❑No NYSDEC-Tidal Wetlands Permit and Non-Jurisdictional Determination for Freshwater Wetlands It.Federal agencies ❑YesONo i. Coastal Resources. L Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No If yes, ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? m YesONo iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesGZ1No* C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑YesmNo only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site mYes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑YesmNo would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway mYes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): Scenic Southold Corridor Management Plan.Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Lona Island North Shore Heritage Area Management Plan c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesONo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): *There is a portion of the overall subject property that is within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. However,the location of the proposed action is outside the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Marine II(MII)District of the Town of Southold 1 b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ❑Yes®No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i.What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Oyster Ponds Union Free School District REUtIVED b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? D E C ZU 1 b Town of Southold of Southold Police Department Department c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? ZONING BOARD OF APPtALS Orient Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? N/A-The proposed facility would be an unmanned wireless communications facility and would not place a demand on or utilize parks. D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Wireless communications facility b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 4.7± acres(Overall subject property) b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.0761± acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.01± acres** c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ®Yes[]No L If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % 29± Units: feet (Represents proposed 20±-foot increase in pole height) d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? []Yes®No If Yes, 1.Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii.Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? []Yes❑No iii.Number of lots proposed? iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No L If No,anticipated period of construction: 1± months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: *Represents area of proposed ground-based equipment compound and underground utility trenching. **Represents area of proposed 443±-square foot equipment compound. Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. I One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family k&gK or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures 2 (Concealment pole extension and equipment compound) (Refers to equipment ii.Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 12'±height; 13'10"±width; and 32'±length compound fencing) iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: o square feet ! h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,r eservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, L Purpose of the impoundment: ii.If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑Groundwater❑Surface water streams❑Other specify: M. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres i v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): i D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes®No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? I fl.How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. I iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes,describe. v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii.Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: j i b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑Yes®No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): i RECEIVED i i DEC 2016 Page 4 of 13 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I H.Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: M. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ❑Yes Mqo If Yes: (Unmanned facility-will not use potable i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day water) ff.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No iii.Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v.If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes ONo If Yes: (Unmanned facility-will not generate liquid i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day waste) ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No RECEIVEU Page 5 of 13 Q F C 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: j i iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): i vi.Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: � I I e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ❑Yes®No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres(impervious surface) Square feet or acres(parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources. } iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: I 1 • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes❑No { iv.Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes❑No I f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ®Yes❑No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: 1.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) i None II U. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) None iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) Diesel-powered emergency backup generator g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: L Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) RECEIVED 4 Page 6 of 13 DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, Yes®No landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: i i.Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i i i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as E]Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): I j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial []Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? (Remotely monitored,unmanned facility) If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening []Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to U.For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: iii.Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease li.Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? DYes[-]No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within V2 mile of the proposed site? FlYesE]No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric E]YesQNo or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing DYesONo pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ®Yes[-]No for energy? If Yes: L Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: To be determined. A minor increase in electricity demand is anticipated. fl.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Local grid(PSEG Long Island) iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? DYes®No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i.During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: 8.00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.* • Monday-Friday: 24 hours/day** • Saturday: NIA • Saturday: 24 hoursiday** • Sunday: N/A • Sunday: 24 hours/day** • Holidays: NIA • Holidays: 24 hours/day** *Typical construction hours. **Remotely monitored,unmanned wireless communications facility RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 Page 7 of 13 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ®Yes[]No operation,or both? ` If yes: L Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: i The proposed action may exceed ambient noise levels during construction However,construction would not occur during sensitive overnight hours in accordance with the Town of Southold noise ordinance. H. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: n..Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes❑No If yes: L Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Outdoor lighting would be installed beneath the proposed equipment canopy.Fixtures would be fully shielded and would not cause off-site light spill ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes®No Describe: o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: I I p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage ofpetroleum(combined capacity ofover 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: L Product(s)to be stored ii.Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) M. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ®No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i.Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation: tons per (unit of time) H.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 Page 8 of 13 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑Yes® No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii.If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes®No waste? If Yes: L Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: fl. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: f I iii.Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month j its.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i.Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial ® Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture ® Aquatic ® Other(specify):Public Parks,Institutional ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: See Attachment i b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. I Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 1.6± 1.6± +0.0006±' • Forested 0 0 0 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- 0 0 0 agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural 0 0 0 (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) 2.4± 2.4± 0 • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 0 0 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) 0.7± 0.7± -0.0006±• • Other Describe: *Represents addition of concrete piers to support proposed equipment platform. RECEIVED Page 9 of 13 DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑YesmNo i.If Yes:explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ❑Yes®No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, L Identify Facilities: e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑YesmNo If Yes: L Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii.Dam's existing hazard classification: iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑YesmNo or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: L Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: fl.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: W. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑YesmNo property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any 0YesF1 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i.Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site mYes[--]No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ® Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): 1102330 ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: N/A W.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑YesmNo If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv.If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Spill#1102330 was closed by the NYSDEC on 12/2/2011. RECEIVED Page 10 of 13 DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes®No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? Soo±feet below grade suface(bgs) b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Fd-Fill land,dredged material 100%* d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 5t feet bgs e.Drainage status of project site soils:®Well Drained: 100%of site ❑Moderately Well Drained: %of site ❑Poorly Drained %of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 100 %of site ❑ 10-15%: %of site ❑ 15%or greater: %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes,describe: h.Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ❑YesmNo* ponds or lakes)? ii.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? OYes❑No If Yes to either i or fl,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ®Yes❑No state or local agency? See Attachment iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Gardiner's Bay Tidal Wetlands and freshwater wetlands Approximate Size N/A • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) PL-3 v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ❑Yes ZNo waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes oNo j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? ®Yes❑No k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑YesONo 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? OYes❑No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: Nassau-Suffolk Sole Source Aquifer REGEAMn *Refers to existing and proposed equipment compound area only Page 11 of 13 D F C 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APP9ALS i in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Herring gull,Robin,House sparrow,Eastern gray squirrel,as well as other common suburban species. n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑YesmNo If Yes: L Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): fl. Source(s)of description or evaluation: W.Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres i o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑YesmNo endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? i The NYSDEC New York Nature Explorer and Environmental Resource Mapper indicate that several endangered or threatened species have been identified in the vicinity of the project site. However,the proposed lease areas consist of lawn and paved areas such that habitat for any endangered or threatened species would not be disturbed by the proposed action. i p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of YesmNo special concern? The NYSDEC New York Nature Explorer and Environmental Resource Mapper indicate that several rare species or species of special concern have been identified in the vicinity of the project site. However,the proposed lease areas consist of lawn and paved areas such that habitat for any rare species or species of special concern would not be disturbed by the proposed action I q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? mYes❑No I�I If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: Fishing may occur within Gardiner's Bay.south of the I proposed facility location. However,the proposed action would not interfere with such activities. f E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑YesoNo Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑YesmNo L If Yes:acreage(s)on project site? U. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑YesmNo Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? mYes❑No If Yes: L CEA name: Peconic Bay and Environs ii.Basis for designation: Benefit to human health&protect drinking water iii.Designating agency and date: Suffolk county,11-13-1988 R�O�Yv�o ING 50p(tD Of �ppEp,�5 Page 12 of 13 SON E t ✓__ _J L e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: 1 i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ElArchaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District i ii.Name: M.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: I f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes®No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? t g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site?' ❑Yes®No If Yes: 1 i.Describe possible resource(s): ii.Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated And publicly accessible federal,state,or local ®Yes E]No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource:North Fork Trail,Orient Beach State Park,Orient Point County Park ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): Scenic byway.State Park,County Park iii Distance between project and resource: 0.1t,0.1t,0.31 miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i.Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? E]Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P C.as Environmental Consultant to Vei¢on Wireless ApplicantlSponsor'Name Date May 17,2016 Signature - Title Project Manager Erin Echevarria RF-CEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOAPD OF APP5-ALS Page 13 of 13 2967518 projrecrindovNYSEAF 4-16 RECEIVED APPLICANT/OWNER DEC 2 2016 TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM ���� ��g�� The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town office �anil"eln_ltlG�es' e Q� �� of this form'is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Robert Haase,on behalf of M G.H Enterprises,Inc (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance— X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO tC If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. K- Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this /7- day of 5,e ,20 16 M.G.H.En i s,In Signature R„ Print Name Robert Haase 1 RECEIVED APPLICANT/OWNER D E C 2016 TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM ZONING BOARD OF APPEi OI� The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose oft s form is to provide informafion which nae alert-the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. �\ YOUR NA 1OY�n 1�Q.lirlpo E • on behalf of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A) through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 21 da of 10 ,2016 New York S A mit a d/b/a Verizon Wireless Signature Title: for Engineer—Equipment Print Name John Walden REG1_>YfO AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE � Zn�6 TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers�fafrli lili&irnitd�ei fFltBamMApghis form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : Denise J.Vista,on behalf of Amato Law Firm,PLLC (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION:(Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO X If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP S� Submitted thi day ofI '& 016 Signature Print Name LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORMjJ� A. INSTRUCTIONS c 1. All applicants for permits*including Town of Southold agencies,shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town Of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Z, Before answering the questions in Section C,the preparer ofthis form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Progta rn A ppaposed action will be evaluated as to its si rig fife�mt beneficial and adverse effects uponthe coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered"yes't or no"then the proposed action will affect the acbievement ofthe LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail listing both supporting and non- supPorting facts.If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northforknet),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. RECEIVED B, DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION CLEC 2, ?_016 SCTM# 15 -9 - 8.1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PR0JF-1CI'Nnl\/ffi Proposed New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Communications Facility-Orient Point 2 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard ❑ Planning Board ® Building Dept, ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) ❑ CC) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: The proposed action involves the installation of a Verizon Wireless communications facility at 40200 Main Road in the hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York(the"subject property").Specifically,Verizon Wireless proposes to install a 20±-foot extension on the existing 69±-foot above grade level(agl)concealment pole at the subject property.Three antennas would be concealed within the resulting 89±-foot agl concealment pole,and associated equipment would be installed within a proposed equipment compound,north of the concealment pole and an adjacent equipment compound of another service provider.The equipment compound would measure 32-feet-by-l3-feet-l0±-inches(443±-square-feet),and would include a pier-supported steel platform(292.51 square feet)with equipment cabinets,main distribution boxes,remote radio heads and a I OkWdiesel-powered emergency backup generator is proposed for this site A weather canopy would cover portions of the equipment platform and would have four GPS units mounted thereon.The equipment compound would be surrounded by a 13-foot agl chain link fence,as well as nine 14-foot agl evergreen plantings for additional visual screening on the north and west sides.Associated utility conduits would be routed underground at the subject property to existing connections. Location Of action:40200 Main Road,hamlet of Orient Site acreage: 4.7f Present land use:Commercial Marina and Restaurant Present zoning classification: Marine II(MII) 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed withthe Town of Southold agency,the following infonnation shall be provided:- (a)Name rovided(a)Name ofapplicar t:New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (b)Mailing address:c/o Amato Law Group,PLLC,666 Old Country Road,Suite 901, Garden City,New York 11530 RECEIVED (c)Telephone number.Area Code() 516-227-6363 DEC 2 2016 (d)Application number,ifany: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ® 'I —] If yes,Whrch State or federal agency?New York State Department of Environmental Conservation C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. M yes ❑ n ❑ Not Applicable 1 The proposed installation males use of existing infrastructure,as it involves the collocation of a Verizon Wireless facility upon and proximate to an existing wireless communications facility on a portion of the overall Orient by the Sea Restaurant and Manna property The overall equipment compound area would occupy only 0 Olt acre(0 a percent of the subject parcel),and it would not involve the clearing ofnatural areas.The 20-foot concealment pole extension would conceal Verizon Wireless antennas within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts As the facility would be collocated within an existing concealment pole on a commercially developed property,same would not adversely impact community character or open space resources Finally,the presence of a communications facility along(or visible from)the Main Road(Route 25)corridor and Gardinces Hay would not be precedent setting,as the proposed facility Installation would he an extension of an existing concealment pole,rather than a completely new Installation Attach additional sheets ifnacessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Not Applicable I I `23 Although the proposed action will not directly protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources,the applicant intends to consult with both the Town of Southold Plammng Department,the New York State Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation and Federally-recognized Indian Tribes to ensure that the proposed facility has been designed and sited such that it would have minimal impacts upon historic and/or archaeological resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3.Enhance visual quality and protea scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ lib ❑ Not Applicable As with the existing concealment pole,the proposed concealment pole extension would be visible from the surrounding area.However, antennas would be concealed within,the extension would match the existing concealment pole in structure and coloration,and it would not significantly alter the existing visual character of the overall subject property.Moreover,it is anticipated that the proposed extension, will be obscured from view from many locations by intervening structures and vegetation. .Finally,the equipment compound would be surrounded on the north and west sides by evergreen plantings to screen views from adjacent areas. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES RECEIVED r � 20�� Policy 4.Minirni� loss oflife,structures,and natt mal resources frorn floadit& - 2 erosion.See LWR.P Section III-Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ® Yes ❑ No ❑Not Applicable According to FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 36103C0088H,the proposed facility location is located within a 100-year floodplain(Zone AE-EL9).However,the proposed accessory equipment would be installed on a pier-raised steel platform,such that same would be above the 9-foot base flood elevation.The proposed ground-based equipment compound would also be situated outside the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.Moreover,the proposed installation will result in the minimal disturbance of only 0.0761±-acre of 9 paved and lawn area on the overall marina and restaurant property(i.e.,an increase in impervious area of 0.0006±-acre).Finally,the proposed facility would be unmanned. Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 5.Protect and improve water quality and supply m the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ lb ® Not Applicable As the proposed facility would be unmanned,it would not require potable water nor would any sewage or solid waste be generated. Moreover, a minimal amount of impervious area would result and there would be no non-point source runoff to adjacent properties as a result of the proposed action.Thus,there would be no benefits or impacts to water quality. I I Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 6.Protect and restore the quality and function ofthe Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal.Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ 11b ® Not Applicable Thd nearest Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat to the proposed facility is Long Beadn Bay,located approximately 150 feet west of the proposed facility.However,the proposed installation would be on previously developed paved and lawn areas and would not result in any significant positive or adverse impacts to ecosystems Rnrcyxlr- ) Attach additional sheets ifnecessary ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Policy 7.Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ lib ® Not Applicable As the proposed facility would be umanned and remotely monitored,requiring minimal vehicular trips,there would be no significant adverse impacts to the air quality resulting from automobile emissions.Additionally,the proposed emergency back-up diesel generator would only operate on an occasional basis for routine testing(typically once per week)and in emergency situations,limiting potential impacts associated with diesel emissions.Moreover,the proposed action does not involve the creation of an industrial use.As such,it is not anticipated that the proposed facility would have any adverse impacts to the air quality of the Town of Southold. Attach additional sheets ifnecessa Policy 8.Nfinm3ize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable The proposed action involves the construction of an unmanned communications facility.Thus,no solid waste,hazardous waste, hazardous substances or other wastes would be generated. t PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9.Provide for public access to,and recreational use of,coastal waters,public lands,and public resources ofthe Town of Southold See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 3 8 X146 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes® No ❑NotApplicable As previously indicated,the proposed action involves the construction of an extension to an existing concealment pole and installation of associated accessory equipment upon a developed portion of a commercial marina and restaurant property.As such,this project does not provide public access to,and recreational use of,coastal waters,public lands and public resources;nor would this project hinder existing public access to such resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORIONG COAST POLIOS Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses andpr mote siting ofnew water-dependent Uses m suitable locations. See LWRP Section III-Policies-Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑No ® Not Applicable As the proposed facility would be collocated within an existing wireless communications facility,it would not directly protect or promote the siting of water-dependent uses.However,improved Verizon Wireless service in the vicinity of the subject property may be a benefit' to those participating in water-dependent activities.Moreover,the proposed facility would not interfere with the existing commercial € marina and restaurant operations at the overall subject property. t C Attach additional sheets ifnece&sary Policy 11.Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound,the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III-Policies;Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes 1:1 No ® Not Applicable As previously discussed,the proposed facility would be unmanned. Although the proposed facility location is in close proximity to Gardiner's Bay(i.e„200E feet),same would have no adverse or beneficial impact on the sustainable use of living marine resources. r Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12.Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold See LWRP Section in Policies;Pages 62 r through 65 for evaluation criteria. h Yes ❑ -Pb ®Not Applicable The proposed action would have no impact on agricultural lands in the Town,as the proposed facility would be situated on previously developed,paved and lawn areas of a commercial marina and restaurant property,with an existing wireless communications facility thereon. 4 Attach additional sheets ifnecessa y Policy 13.Promote appropriate use and developinent of energy and YY11Yleralresources. See LVURP Section III-Policies;Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ®Ycs ❑ No❑ Not Applicable The proposed facility would use minimal electricity and would be unmanned.Therefore,the effect on energy and mineral resources would be minimal. PREPAREDBY f J=Project Manager DAJEMay 17,2016 Erin Echevarria,VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Arehitectuie,P.C.as Environmental Consultant to Verizon Wifeless RECEIVED Amended on 811105 DEC 2 2016 ptojrecftndoc:29675.18_Southo1d LWRP Form-5-16 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED Board of Zoning Appeals Application DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) 1, Robert Haase,on behalf of M G H Enterprises. Inc residing at c/o 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) do hereby authorize New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a (Agent) — Venzon Wireless to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. M.G.H Enterprises, Inc By a, 4,ye gnn— (Owner's Signature) Robert Haase (Print Owner's Name) FORK No. 4 7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. �' . �g ............. Date ....................'September.....1:.. 19..b3 THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at ..P/p..... .1?.. .... ............................ Street Map No. .......*M....... Block No. ... ........... Lot No. Ar" .......Q-V�Ant..PAIAtA...4.s. k. ......... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated rebwrary 4 6 41982 ...............I.............. .. ..•................... ., 19.. pursuant to which Building Permit No. ....... ...... dated ....................................................... 19..§A., was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ Businessbui1ding,:...Ngj7 ggj .yman .. u�p , �,, q ,egg . The certificate is issued to ....Y0001I10110W Properties .IY�a........... Owned' .,,,._ .. . .... . . . .... (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. ......................................................... ..................... Building Inspectoh DECEIVED ITEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED BUILDING DEPARTM TOWN CLERKS OFF CE DEC 2 2016 SOUTHOLD, H. Y. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. .. -21+102........... Date ............................� ,�...... .d.... ., THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at .$/S...,p�a,ln••Read.................................. Street Map No. ...0=........... Block No. ..... .......... Lot No. =.......orient..P.Qint. .X911......... conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ••••••••••••••••••.•.••.••.••.•fttkwarY.....23., 19,.66, pursuant to which Building Permit No. ,,30,0 ,,Z dated ..................................ftp.#......22,g,,,, 19,•,66 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ........ �a;sin�e�g...b� d� g,• price; . .» ore.t... t�i�� t;trata ...�a>��a................................... The certificate is issued to .... l�bor�hc�i11ow••Praper��.e s...I�......... .........jQwx�er.................... owner, lessee or tenant} of the aforesaid building. ................. •Building lnspecto FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED BUILDING DEPARTMEI3T DEC Office of the Building Inspector 2016 Town Hall Southold, N.Y. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z19054 Date MAY 17, 1990 THIS CERTIFIES that the building BUSINESS ALTERATIONS Location of Property 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 15 Block 09 _Lot 08 Subdivision Fated Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated DEC. 27, 1988 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 01778GZ dated JAN. 27, 1989 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ALTERATION TO EXISTING BUSINESS BUILDING. The certificate is issued to MGH ENTERPRISES INC. (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL NIA UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N070685 MAY 9, 1989 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED KING PLUMBING & HEATING MAY 10, 1990 Building Inspector Rev. 1/81 FORM N0. 4 RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT D F C 2 2016 Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-28163 Date: 01/11/02 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ACCESSORY Location of Property: 40200 MAIN RD ORIENT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 15 Block 9 Lot 8.1 Subdivision Filed Map No_ Lot No_ conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated APRIL 19, 2001 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 27273-Z dated APRIL 27, 2001 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ACCESSORY BUILDING AS APPLIED FOR ZBA #4905 DATED 1/4/01 NEW YORK STATE PETITION #2002-0003. The certificate is issued to M.G.H_ . ENTERPRISES, INC. (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL C10-01-0004 12/14/01 ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. N 574842 10/30/01 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 10/24/01 GALE KASKE Aal.- Authorized Si nature Rev. 1/81 FORM,NO. 4 RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DEC 2 2016 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING BOARD Office of the Building Inspector OF AppEq�g Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-32315 Date: 04/26/06 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ANSEL SYSTEM Location of Property: 40200 MAIN RD ORIENT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 15 Block 9 Lot 8.1_ Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated MARCH 24, 2005 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 31018-Z dated MARCH 24, 2005 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is INSTALLATION OF AN ANSEL SYSTEM & HOOD IN EXISTING RESTAURANT AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to MGH ENTERPRISES, INC. (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK CO[M= DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 2051426 04/26/05 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A LJ Authorized Signature Rev. 1/81 t � t ,f Town of Southold Annex 1/9/2014 Z�; P.O.Boz 1179 °°°••���'' - 54375 Main Road RECEIVE) Southold,New York 11971 D E C 2 2016 -- — — – ApFETCS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 36694 Date: 1/9/2014 THIS CERTIFIES that the building SOLAR PANEL Location of Property: 40200 Route 25,Orient, SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 15.-9-8.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated 10/28/2013 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 38482 dated 11/6/2013 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR PANELS AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to Mgh Enterprises Inc (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 38482 12-20-2013 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Auth d Si atur Town of Southold Annex 1/13/201 P.O.Box 1179 RECEIVED 54375 Main Road 7b Southold,New York 11971 D E C 2 2016 f '7nl ITRIr Kennnn nK nnr+rnLS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 37382 Date: 1/13/2015 THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Location of Property: 40200 Route 25,Orient, SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 15.-9-8.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 3/19/2014 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 3723 dated 3/19/2014 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the Iaw. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: wireless communication monopole with equipment as applied for per ZBA#6533 dated 2/15/2012 (New Cingular Wireless/AT&T.) l The certificate is issued to Mgh Enterprises Inc (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. i 38723 7/2.4/2014 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED th iz Signature • APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS o�oSufiFO(�-�, OG Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman �� �� 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. yP.O. Box 1179 Z Lydia A.Tortora • Southold, New York 11971 Lora S. Collins y �� ZBA Fax (631)765-9064 George Horning Ol [ `�� Telephone (631) 765-1809 RECEIVED BOARD OF APPEALS � D E C 2 016 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2001 Appl. No. 4905—ORIENT BY THE SEA MARINA/MGH ENTERPRISES HAAS Parcel Location: South Side of Main Road (S.R. 25), Orient PARCEL 1000-15-9-9.1 Date of Public Hearing: January 4, 2001. FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS: A site plan prepared by Architechnologies, dated October 19, 2000, shows the subject property to be a parcel of 4.55 acres lying between Main Road and Gardiner's Bay in Orient. It is improved with a restaurant and a marina for commercial and recreational fishing boats. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval, dated November 21, 2000, denying a permit to construct an accessory building because it would be 3 feet from the property line whereas Code section 121 C(1) requires a minimum setback of 20 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing the location of the accessory building as proposed, with a 3-foot setback from the westerly lot line. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) Applicant wants to provide adequate restrooms for marina patrons, as well as some cold storage for patrons' fish and ordinary storage space for his business. He proposes to build a 20 x 40-foot structure containing these facilities. (2) The property is deep from Main Road to the Bay, but narrow, and the entire center is a boat basin. The relatively narrow strip of land between the westerly lot line and the boat basin is paved and provides vehicular access with parking spaces abutting the westerly lot line. The rational location for the proposed building is on this paved strip. Although there is open land near Gardiner's Bay, that would be a very inconvenient location for the proposed building. (3) In order to minimize interference with vehicular traffic moving through the property and using the parking spots on the westerly edge of the property, applicant wants to place the proposed building only 3 feet from the westerly lot line. The Board believes this location is desirable for vehicular and pedestrian safety. Since the land to the west is open parkland owned by New York State, construction in the proposed location will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. w Page 2—January 18, 2001 � 1 ' Appl. No. 4905—Orient by the Sea Marina 1000-15-9-8.1 at Orient RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 Z0NIlIG BOARD OF APPEALS (4) There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. (5) The action set forth below is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable applicant to provide adequate restroom and storage facilities in a rational location while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the requested variance subject to the CONDITION that the accessory structure shall at no time be used as sleeping or living quarters. Vote of the Board: AYES: Members Goehringer, Dinizio, Tortora, Collins. (Member Horning of Fishers Island was absent.) This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). ERARD P.ZGOEHRINGElk, CHAIRMAN T C;; 11AL U , DAT as�ol - 10: 30 Town Clerk, Town of BOARD MEMBERS *rjf SO�Ty Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �0� Deo 53095 Main Road •P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George'Horning p '�� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider IyCOUKj`(,� Southold,NY 11971 ' P-PCEIVECD http://southoldtown.northfork.net 6 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS �ONING ° TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - E-45) g Tel.(631)765.1809•Fax(631)765-9064 2 1 2012 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINCfION ,9 �A MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15,2012 ZBA FILE: 6533 NAME OF APPLICANT: MGH Enterprises,Inc./New Cinguiar Wireless, LLC PROPERTY LOCATIONA0200 Main Road(adj.to Gardiners Bay)Orient NY SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 12, 2012 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 30, 2012. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject property is a conforming lot in the MII zone. It is improved with a one story frame restaurant with attached deck, accessory one and two story building, along with boat slips. It has 181.72 feet of frontage on Main Road (SR 25), 752.00 feet along the eastern property line, 348.41 feet on Gardiners Bay and 1000.01 along the western property line as shown on the survey dated 4-6-2006 last updated 10- 27-2011 prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger,PLLC. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XVII Code Section 280-70i(3) and Article XIII Section 280-56 (Bulk Schedule), based on an application for building permit to install a wireless telecommunication tower and equipment and the Building Inspector's October 17, 2011, amended November 9, 2011 Notice of Disapproval at; l) less than the code required distance to adjacent residential property line of 500 feet, 2) less than the code required side yard setback of 25 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to install a new wireless communication tower and equipment at 7.1 feet from a residential property line where the code requires minimum distance shall be no less than 500 feet and a side yard setback of 7.1 feet where the code requires 25 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Zoning Board requested comments from the Planning Board. In a memorandum dated December 20,2011,the Planning Board stated they just received the Site Plan and Special Page 2 l3—February 15,2012 ZBA FileN6533—MGH Enterprises,Inc./New Cingulaz Wireless,LLC CTM; 1000-15-9-8 1 Exception applications and have not yet determined their completeness. The Planning Board requested a condition be added to the decision stating the proposed height and location are necessary and confirmed by the Planning Board as per Town Code, The applicant submitted, on Feb. 6, 2012, a letter from NYS Office of Parks,Recreation, and Historic Preservation indicating that the applicant's proposed project will have "no effect upon the cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Registers of Historic Places;"and a cover letter explaining that that State was duly notified by certified mail about the public hearing and had not replied and did nota ear in opposition . RECEVED DEC 2 2016 FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: I-UN111tf: R(?Acz,-%nil, The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 2,2012 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law$267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The surrounding area is of mixed uses containing a marina,a restaurant, an office building and parking lot used by Plum Island employees,a large interstate ferry terminal and a residential development. Any detriment is mitigated by the placement of the tower at the southernmost end of the property which is the farthest distance from the existing buildings and residences in the area. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because any proposal to construct a cellular tower to fill in the gap in coverage that is proposed by this request in this area of Southold Town would require similar or larger variances. 3. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. The code required minimum distance of all wireless equipment adjacent to residential property lines is no less than 500 feet, the applicant is proposing a 7.1 foot setback, representing a greater than ninety eight percent (98%) relief from the code. Also the requirement of a 25 foot minimum side yard setback is proposed to be reduced to 7.1 feet; this represents a seventy percent(70%)relief from the code. However,the residential property in question is owned by Long Island State Park Commission(Orient State Park)and has no residential structures located within the required fall zone and is the access roadway to the park with no access to the beach within the area of the monopole site. , 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. With respect to the physical impact on the neighborhood,the Board finds,based on the report submitted by the applicant titled "Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility Orient By the Sea" Prepared by VHB Engineering surveying and Landscape Architecture,PC,that the location is the least obtrusive,given the uses in the surrounding area and the limited choice of locations for siting such a structure. As for the environmental conditions with respect to the radio frequency emissions,the total amount emitted will be more than 48 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure as set by the FCC and stated on page 12 (Compliance Conclusion) of the report titled "Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance assessment and Report submitted by the applicant's expert consultant 5. TownLaw 267-b(3)(b)(�. The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant choose the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to choosing this location. However, the difficulty is actually caused by the lack of any parcel within the proposed effective range of the proposed tower that would not need even more extreme variances. \1 Page 3 of 3—February 15,2012 ZBA File#6533—MGH Enterprises,Inc/New Cingular Wireless,LLC CTM: 1000-15-9-8.1 6. Town Law 5267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new wireless telecommunication tower and equipment while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Schneider, and duly carried, to GRANT,the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan prepared by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLC and dated 4/27/06 last revised 10/28/11 and the survey dated 4-6-2006 last updated 10-27-2011 prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger, PLLC. Subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: I. The height and location variances granted in this decision is subject to the Applicants receiving site plan and Special Exception approvals and confirmation of the necessity of the proposed location and height, as per Town code,from the Southold Town Planning Board. 2. Although the drawings approved in this decision refer to a monopole designed to telescope to 90 feet in height,this decision is not a de facto height variance. The MII zone permits a maximum of 80 feet for cell towers; and should the applicant deem it necessary in future to increase the height of the monopole beyond what the code permits,they must return to the ZBA for a height variance. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformilies under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Schneider,Dinizio,Horning, Member Goehringer was absent. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0) RECEIVED U,4611N� DEC 2 2016 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Approved for filing /2012 I�111111 IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII illll IIIII 1111111111 IIII IIII RECEIVED 1111111111111111111111111 DEC 2 2016 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DECLARATION Recorded: 09/18/2012 Number of Pages: 8 At: 01:51:31 PM Receipt Number : 12-0107374 LIBER: D00012705 PAGE: 527 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 015.00 09.00 008.001 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $40.00 NO Handling $20.00 NO COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 NO TP-584 $0.00 NO Notation $0.00 NO Cert.Copies $10.00 NO RPT $60.00 NO Fees Paid $150.00 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE County Clerk, Suffolk County i I � C CJ ED Number of es RE18 01: pages 2012 Sep 18 OIsS1t31 PM ' JUDITH A. PRSI.f+LE CLERK OF This document will be public SUFFOLK COUM RECEIVED record.Please remove all L 000012705 Social Security Numbers P 527 nE C �0�6 prior to recording. Deed/Mortgage instrument Deed/Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 3 FEES Page/FiIingFee —' Mortgage Amt. Handling 20. 00 1•Basic Tax 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Notation SpecJAssit. or EA•5217(County) Sub Total Spec/Add. EA-5217(State) _ TOT.MTG.TAX RJ'.TS A. Dual Town Dual County Held for A I ppointment i Comm.of Ed. S. 00 Transfer Tax Affidavit f • �s Mansion Tax Certified Copy The property covered by this mortgage is or will be Improved by a one or two NYS Surcharge 15. 00 family dwelling only. Sub Total YES or NO Other Grand Tota) J V If N0,see appropriate tax clause on paged of this instrument. 4 Oist.�I 1000 01500 0900 008001 5 Community Preservation Fund I i Real Propenp T S Consideration Amount$ Tax Service R DHO A Agency �gsEp_7 CPF Tax Due S Verification Improved 6 Sati acdons/0ischarges/Reases List Property Owners Mall ng Address RECORD&RETURN TO: Vacant Land SOhn 73. coovn 'n �a_tN.clso�,t 1�1,Pz%e✓ Q,nd Corc,l►n,L.L.P ala Neral,. Ntx-) 14A► - A�L%A- e- To wi 117 3 ro L-1 S LA 100 Mail to:Judith A.Pascale,Suffolk County Clerk 7 Title Company information 310 Center Drive, Riverhead, NY 11901 Co.Name wwwsuffolkcountyny.gov/clerk Title a e Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached T)LPC-1 made +1 (SIFECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) • H- �y,�q_Of t St.S .n C. . The premises herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. 9 TO In the TOWN of Z"n 0 II 1A In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of BOXES 6 THRU 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. MEW i i l ' DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION made this 10— day of September, 2012, by M.G.H. Enterprises, Inc. with an address of 40200 Main Road (a/k/a S/11/25), Orient, NY 11957, hereinafter referred to as "DECLARANT': WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, DECLARANT is the owner of certain real property located at 40200 Main Road (alk/a S/R/25), Orient, NY 11957, County of Suffolk, State of New York, described in the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 which is more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule"A" annexed hereto, hereinafter referred to as the Property; and WHEREAS, the DECLARANT has entered into a lease agreement with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("New Cingular") to construct a wireless telecommunication facility on a portion of the Property, as depicted on Schedule "B"annexed hereto; and WHEREAS, the New Cingular has made an application to Planning Board of the Town of Southold for site plan approval to construct a wireless telecommunication facility on a portion of the property as shown on the Site Plan entitled 'AT&T Orient by the Sea Restaurant, prepared by William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP, Revision 7, last revised August 11, 2012 (hereinafter the "Site Plan"); WHEREAS, in a decision dated September 17, 2012, the Planning Board of the Town of-Southold granted New Cingular's site plan application with conditions; RECEIVED PEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS i , i WHEREAS for and in consideration of the granting of said approval, the ! Planning Board has deemed it in the best interests of the Town of Southold that , i the within covenants and restrictions be imposed on the property, and the Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, the DECLARANT has considered the foregoing and has determined that same will be for the best interests of the DECLARANT and subsequent owners and lessees of the property, NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH: i That the DECLARANT for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above i expressed, does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the covenants and restrictions as herein cited, which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said lots, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributes, successors and assigns to wit:: The following landscaping will be installed on the portion of the property i where the wireless telecommunication facility is constructed as depicted on the i approved Site Plan: 1. Six (6) Eastern Red Cedars to be located along the west side of the proposed equipment area, which measures approximately 36 feet in length (36' / 6'-wide cedars = 6 cedars); RECEIVED LEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPi=ALS t 2 I 2. Three (3) Eastern Red Cedars to be located along the north side of the proposed equipment area which measures approximately 19 feet in length (19' /6'-wide cedars=3 cedars); 3. The Eastern Red Cedars shall provide contiguous screening of the equipment area to the north and west and will be planted so that the branches are touching; 4. Additional Eastern Red Cedars may be added to accomplish the purpose of the screening which is to mitigate any visual impacts to the adjacent New York State Park and the New York State Scenic Byway; 5. The landscaping shall be kept in goodthealthy condition and shall be replaced should any tree(s) die at any point during the existence of the monopole and related equipment. THE FOREGOING covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding on the DECLARANT, its heirs, assign, purchasers, or successors in interest, and upon all persons or entities claiming under them, and may not be annulled, waived, changed, modified, terminated, revoked, or amended by subsequent owners of the premises, but shall immediately terminate upon the removal of the wireless telecommunication facility monopole and base equipment. If any section, subsection, paragraph, clause, phrase or provision of these covenants and restrictions shall, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, be adjudged illegal, unlawful, invalid or held to be unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of these covenants as a whole, or any other part or RECEIVED 3 LEC 2016 ZONING BOARD of APPFALS ' 4toz 3 I i I provision hereof other than the part so adjudged to be illegal, unlawful, invalid, or i unconstitutional. The aforementioned covenants and restrictions are intended for the benefit of and shall be enforceable by the Town of Southold, State of New York, by injunctive relief or by any other remedy in equity or at law. The failure of the Town of Southold or any of its agencies to enforce same shall not be deemed to affect the validity of this covenant nor to impose any liability whatsoever upon the Town of Southold or any office or employee thereof. The within Covenants and Restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Declarant and its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities claiming under them, and' may not be annulled, waived, changed, modified, terminated, revoked or amended by subsequent owners of the premises unless and until approved by a majority plus one vote of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold or its successor, following a public hearing. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the within covenants and restrictions shall automatically terminate upon the removal or decommissioning of the wireless telecommunication facility monopole and base equipment. RECEIVED I LlEC 2- 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I [SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 4 ire ®off IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant(s) has duly executed this Declaration the day and year first above written. M.G. . nterprises, I c. By:'Robert Haase, Vice President STATE OF NEW YORK ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK On the 10 day of September in the year 2012, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert Haase, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that -he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual or the persons on behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the Instrument. r� Q. Notary Public wo NANCY S BARTOw Notary public-Slate of New York N0.01 BA6246841 WaAlled In Suffolk f� un My Cemm7sslon Expires 7f 75 IS RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 5 I i Schedule"A" Parcel 1: i All that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in the Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and State of j New York,bounded and described as follows; BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Main Road which point marks the northwesterly comer of premises herein described and the northeasterly corner of land formerly of the State of New York;running thence along the southerly side of Main Road,North 87 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds East, 151.72 feet to land of the United States Government;thence running by last mentioned land,South 11 degrees 43 minutes 20 seconds East,752 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Gardner's Bay;thence southwesterly along the ordinary high water mark of Gardener's Bay, the tie line of which bears South 39 degrees 44 minutes 40 seconds west,348.41 feet to land formerly j of the State of New York;thence running by last mentioned land North 4 degrees 40 i minutes 45 seconds West, 1000 feet to the southerly side of Main Road,at the point or place of beginning. i Parcel 2: f t All that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in the Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and State of i New York, bounded and described as follows: I BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Main Road,said point being where the northeasterly corner of the premises to be described and the northwesterly corner of land N/F of MGH Enterprises, Inc.,as described in Liber 18607 at page 67 intersect said j southerly side of Main Road;running thence South 4 degrees 40 minutes 45 seconds East,along the land N/F of MGH Enterprises,Inc., 800.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds West,30.00 feet,to land of Orient Beach State Park;thence North s 4 degrees 40 minutes 45 seconds West,along the land of Orient Beach State Park, 800.00 feet to the southerly side of Main Road;thence North 87 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds East,along the southerly side of Main Road,30.00 feet,to point or place of beginning. I i • t i ' RECEIVED DEC 2016 I ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL I I 6 I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X In the Matter of the Application of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, as Applicant for variance relief pursuant to § 280-56 of the Town of Southold Code, in order to construct, RECEIVED operate, and maintain a public utility wireless communication facility at 40200 Main Road, Orient, D E C 2010 New York, known and designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 15, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Block 9, Lot 8.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X PETITION IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION BY NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS FOR VARIANCE RELIEF TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE,AND MAINTAIN A PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY Amato Law Group, PLLC Attorneys for Petitioner 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City,New York 11530 (516) 227-6363 I. SHORT FORM DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION 1. Petition by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals (the "ZBA") for an area variance pursuant to Article XIII, § 280-56 of the Town Zoning Code (the "Code") to construct, operate, and maintain a public utility wireless communication facility on certain property located at 40200 Main Road, Orient,New York(the "Application"). RECEIVED DEC 2 2010 II. PRECISE STATEMENT OF THE RELIEF REQUESTED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 2. On or about April 29, 2016, Verizon Wireless filed a building permit application with the Town Building Department to collocate a public utility wireless communication facility at the property located at 40200 Main Road, Orient,New York, known and designated as Suffolk County Property Tax Map Identification No.: District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property"). The building permit application was denied in a Notice of Disapproval, dated May 23, 2016, and amended on October 18, 2016 (the "Denial"), on the grounds that Verizon Wireless is required to obtain: (a) site plan approval from the Town Planning Board;' and (b) a variance from the Town ZBA, pursuant to Article XIII, § 280-56 of the Town Code. 3. As indicated in the Denial, Verizon Wireless' Building Permit Application was denied pursuant to § 280-56 of the Town Code, which requires accessory uses within the Marine II zoning district, in which the Property is located, to be set back a minimum of 25' from the side yard lot lines. As discussed below, Verizon Wireless' Equipment Compound (hereinafter defined) is set back 7'-3" from the westerly property line, adjacent to, and consistent with the ' A public hearing was held on Verizon Wireless' Site Plan Application before the Town Planning Board on September 12,2016. The Planning Board reserved decision pending the ZBA decision on the Application. Please note that the Town's Wireless Consultant, Cityscape Consultants, Inc., recommended approval of Verizon Wireless' proposed Communication Facility (hereinafter defined). Attached as Exhibit"A"is a copy of their report,dated July 14,2016. 2 -- ��ECEIVED ` DEC 2 2016 existing AT&T Facility (hereinafter defined) located at the Property. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 4. This Petition is submitted by Verizon Wireless, with offices located at 4 Centerock Road, West Nyack, New York 10994, and M.G.H. Enterprises, Inc. (the "Owner"), with a mailing address of 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York 11957, in support of their application to the Town ZBA for an area variance pursuant to Article XIII, § 280-56 of the Town Code.2 5. Verizon Wireless is a public utility pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. In Matter of Cellular Telephone Company v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364, 624 N.E.2d 990, 604 N.Y.S.2d 895 (1993), the Court of Appeals held that a wireless communications provider, such as Verizon Wireless, is considered a public utility and, as such, is entitled to a deferential standard of review when public necessity is shown. See also Cellular Telephone Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490 (2d Cir. 1999). 6. The deference accorded a wireless communications carrier is supported by the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (hereinafter the "TCA"), Congress' express intent to ensure rapid deployment of wireless communications services on a national basis. The TCA is "designed to accelerate rapidly" the deployment of wireless and other advanced technologies and services. Cellular at 493 (quoting H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 206 (1996), reprinted in 1996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 124, 124). 7. "Public necessity is shown when the proposed site is necessary to enable the company to render safe and adequate service, and that no alternative sites are available which could be used with less disruption to the communities zoning plan." 1 Anderson, New York Zoning Law and Practice (3rd ed.), § 11.24, pp. 565-66. See also Matter of Consolidated Edison 2 Verizon Wireless and the Owner are hereinafter collectively referred to as the"Petitioners" 3 -e7ac� RECEIVED DEC 2 2010 Co. v. Hoffman, 43 N.Y.2d 598, 374 N.E.2d 106, 403 N.Y.S.2d 193 (1978). 20NING BOARD OF APPEALS 8. Verizon Wireless is licensed by the FCC. Copies of Verizon Wireless' FCC licenses are annexed hereto as Exhibit "B". Verizon Wireless' FCC licenses require that it provide reliable wireless telephone service within the geographic boundaries of the Town and the surrounding areas. Further, in accordance with 47 USCA § 615 of the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999, Verizon Wireless must provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable wireless coverage to its users. III. STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE BY THE APPLICANT 9. The Property is located on the south side of Main Road in Orient, New York, adjacent to the right-of-way of Orient State Parkway to the west. It is currently zoned Marine II, as confirmed by the Town, and is improved with the Orient by the Sea restaurant, a marina, associated paved parking areas, and the existing, previously approved AT&T communication facility (the "AT&T Facility"). 10. Verizon Wireless entered into a lease agreement with the Owner to lease a portion of the Property for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining a public utility wireless communication facility consisting of, among other things: (a) a twenty (20') foot RF- compatible extension (the "Extension") to the existing 69'-0" above ground level ("agl") concealment monopole (the "Monopole"), with a new top height of 89'-0" agl; (b) installation of three (3) wireless panel antennas (the "Antennas") and six (6) diplexers, concealed within the 20'-0" Extension, with Antenna top heights of 88'-6"+ agl; (c) an approximately 13'-10" x 32'- 0" equipment compound (the "Equipment Compound") located to the north of the Monopole, adjacent to the AT&T Facility, and surrounded by a 13'-0" high chain link fence with privacy 4 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS slats, and 14'-0" high Eastern Red Cedar trees, consistent with the fencing, trees, and setback of the existing AT&T Facility; (d) a weather canopy (the "Canopy") above portions of the Equipment Compound, with four (4) global positioning satellite ("GPS") units mounted thereto, with the top height of both the Canopy and GPS units at 13'+ agl; (e) wireless communications equipment/cabinets, and a IOkW diesel-fired emergency back-up generator with sound enclosure, located within the Equipment Compound; and (0 all other appurtenances, improvements, equipment, devices, cables, conduits and wires related thereto, as more fully described on the construction drawings submitted herewith (collectively referred to as the "Communication Facility"). 11. The Owner of the Property has authorized and consented to have Verizon Wireless act as its agent for the limited purpose of obtaining all necessary zoning approvals and permits to construct, operate and maintain the Communication Facility on the Property. A copy of the Owner's Authorization and Consent, sworn to on March 16, 2016, is annexed hereto and incorporated herewith as Exhibit "C". IV. VARIANCE RELIEF - PUBLIC UTILITY STANDARD 12. As noted above, Verizon Wireless is a public utility pursuant to the laws of New York State. Thus, Verizon Wireless' application for an area variance is governed by the "public utility" standard. See Cellular Telephone Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490 (2d Cir. 1999). 13. Pursuant to the "public utility" standard, Verizon Wireless need only establish that there is a public necessity for the proposed installation. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372. Once Verizon Wireless establishes that there is a "public necessity" for the proposed installation, a 5 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONINGAOARD OF APPEALS variance must be granted. Id; see also Omnipoint Communications Inc. v. Town of LaGrange, 658 F.Supp.2d 539, 555 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). 14. More specifically, under the public utility standard, Verizon Wireless need only establish that: (i) there are gaps in service; (ii) the location of the proposed facility will remedy those gaps; and (iii)the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Village of Floral Park Board of Trustees, 812 F.Supp.2d 143, 154 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)(citations omitted). 15. We respectfully submit that under the relevant factors herein, Verizon Wireless is entitled to an area variance, as it satisfies all of the elements of the "public necessity" test, as set forth below. (A) Verizon Wireless Has Established Gaps In Service 16. Verizon Wireless is experiencing a serious service deficiency in its communications coverage within the Town, as addressed in the RF Report, prepared by C Squared Systems, LLC, dated October 21, 2016, which was filed with the Application to the ZBA (the "RF Report"). As depicted in the propagation maps contained in the RF Report, the gap in coverage includes the Property and the surrounding areas. 17. Verizon Wireless' RF engineer has determined that Verizon Wireless' existing sites do not provide reliable coverage in this area of the Town. As a result, Verizon Wireless is unable to provide seamless, ubiquitous, reliable wireless coverage to its users, pursuant to the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999. Accordingly, Verizon Wireless has established the first element of the "public necessity"test. (B) The Location of the Proposed Communication Facility Will Remedy Those Gaps 18. The collocation of the proposed Communication Facility at the subject Property is 6 RECEIVED EC 2 2096 ;CONING BOARD OF APPEALS ideally located and necessary to address Verizon Wireless' existing coverage gap. The siting of the proposed Communication Facility has been designed to maximize coverage in the area. In addition, the Equipment Compound will be located proximate to the existing Monopole, and will be consistent with AT&T's Facility, with respect to the design, location, and setback of same to the Property's west side yard. 19. There are no other existing feasible structures upon which the Communication Facility can be sited, other than at the Property, and provide the coverage required for this area. Accordingly, Verizon Wireless has established the second element of the"public necessity"test. (C) The Proposed Communication Facility Presents a Minimal Intrusion on the Community 20. The granting of an area variance for the proposed Communication Facility will present a minimal, if any, intrusion on the community. Verizon Wireless' Equipment Compound will be located in the rear of the Property, approximately 695' southwest of Main Road (aka Route 25), and will not interfere with the present marina and restaurant operations thereon. Additionally, the Equipment Compound will be screened by a 13'-0" high chain link fence with privacy slats and surrounded on the west and north sides by Eastern Red Cedar trees, which is consistent with the AT&T Facility. Further, the Equipment Compound will be set back 7'-3" from the westerly Property line, which is also consistent with AT&T's Facility.3 Accordingly, there will be no substantial changes to the physical characteristics of the neighborhood due to the installation of the Communication Facility, and the impact to the nearby properties will be minimal, if any. 21. The proposed Communication Facility is designed to meet or exceed the requirements of the current applicable provisions of the New York State and Town Building 7 .t ��Jo� RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 Codes. The proposed unmanned Communication Facility w'11 not: (i) create alLyN fAAM 8�APPEALS sewage, effuse, or other effluent; (ii) require any new means of ingress or egress; (iii) create any hazard to life, limb or property; or (iv) prevent the orderly and reasonable use of the surrounding properties or affect the safety, health and welfare of such properties. 22. Moreover, Verizon Wireless' Communication acility will benefit the community by providing a reliable means of communication for police, ambulance, and fire departments and personnel during an emergency, in addition to the Cross Sound Ferry, which abuts the Property to the east. Therefore, by serving the public interest, the Communication Facility will be beneficial to the community. As such, Verizon Wireless has demonstrated the third element of the "public necessity" test. 23. Accordingly, Verizon Wireless has established its entitlement to an area variance under the public necessity standard. V. AREA VARIANCE STANDARD UNDER NEW YORK STATE TOWN LAW 24. Although it undisputed that as a matter of law, Verizon Wireless is entitled to variance relief under the "public necessity" standard, Verizon Wireless' Application also satisfies the more stringent standard for an area variance set fo h in New York Town Law. 25. An area variance application is governed by Town Law § 267-b(3), which provides that the ZBA "shall take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant." In making such determination, the ZBA shall also consider the following: (a) whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the 3 The Denial incorrectly states that the Equipment Compound will be set back 7Y from the side yard. 8 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS i neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by granting the area variance; (b) whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance; (c) whether the requested area variance is substantial; (d) whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical conditions in the neighborhood or district; and (e) whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. 26. As set forth below, Verizon Wireless' Application meets the Town Law area I (setback) variance standards: (a) An undesirable change will not be produced in the character of the neighborhood, nor will a detriment to nearby properties be created by granting the area (setback) variance: The granting of an area variance for the proposed Communication Facility will not produce any undesirable change in the character of the i neighborhood. The Equipment Compound will be located at the southernmost end of the 1 Property, approximately 695' southwest of Main Road, and will not interfere with the i marina and restaurant operations thereon, or impact 'Ithe use of any nearby properties. Verizon Wireless' Equipment Compound will be consistent with the existing AT&T Facility, as it will be set back the same distance t'o the westerly Property line and designed to match the same. Further, the visual impact to the nearby residences would be minimal, if any, since the Equipment Compound will be concealed by the proposed fencing and landscaping. Moreover, the proposed unmanned Communication Facility is designed to meet or exceed the requirements of the current applicable provisions of the New York State and Town Building Codes, and will not: (i) create any discharge of sewage, effuse, or other effluent; (ii) require any new means of ingress/egress; (iii) create 9 i RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS any hazard to life, limb or property; and/or (iv) prevent the orderly and reasonable use of the surrounding properties or affect the safety, health 7 d welfare of such properties. (b) The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by any other feasible method than an area (setback) variance. The Applicant seeks an area (setback) variance, in order for its Equipment Co 7 pound to be located as near as practicable to the existing Monopole, in a similar manner as the previously approved AT&T Facility. As noted above, the Communication Facility is ideally located and necessary to eliminate Verizon Wireless' service defic=Communication in this area of the Town. There are no other available, existing structures upon Facility can be located to remedy the service deficiencies within this area other than at the Property, which is the least obtrusive location available. In addition, as noted above, both the location and the appearance of the Equipment Compound have been designed to be consistent with the existing AT&T Facility, in order to avoid interference with the marina and restaurant operations on the Property, and to maximize the distance to the residential dwellings. (c) The requested relief is not substantial: The proposed Equipment Compound would be set back 7'-3" from the westerly Property line. The minimum side yard setback for accessory buildings on properties greater than 80,000 square feet within the Marine II zoning district is 25'. The reduction in the side yard setback is in keeping with the existing AT&T Facility, which is set back the same distance, 7'-3", from the westerly Property line. Thus, the requested relief is consistent with the relief previously granted by this Board for the AT&T Facility. The ZBA decision for the existing AT&T Facility is attached as Exhibit "U'. In addition, the proposed Equipment Compound 10 RECEIVED DEC 2 2096 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS location is ideally situated so as not to interfere with present operations on the Property. Further, although the adjacent property is zoned residential, it is not developed with g J P p Y residential uses; rather, it is improved with the acce s roadway to Orient Beach State Park. (d) The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical conditions in the neighborhood: The roposed Communication Facility, including the Equipment Compound, will not have any adverse effect or impact on the physical conditions in the neighborhood. See Sectio IV(C)(19)-(21), supra. As noted therein, the Equipment Compound will be concealed by proposed fencing and landscaping, will not have any negative impacts on the environment, nor will there be any adverse impacts, visual or otherwise, on the neighborhood. (e) The need for the variance relief was not self-created: The Applicant's need for an area (setback) variance in order to construct its Equipment Compound on the Property was not self-created. The Communication Facility is necessary for Verizon Wireless to provide seamless, ubiquitous, and reliable coverage in the Town by resolving the service deficiency gap which Verizon Wireless is presently experiencing in the subject area. In addition, the collocation of the Communication Facility at the Property is appropriate, due to the existing AT&T Facility at the Property, and the prior area variance granted by this Board. As noted above, the location of the Equipment Compound will not interfere with the operations on the Property or nearby properties. Lastly, the proposed location of the Equipment Compound was chosen, as it will be consistent with the previously approved location of the existing AT&T Facility compound and as near as practicable to the Monopole. 11 _n '_2 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VI. STATEMENT OF PREVIOUS ZONING RELIEF SOUGHT 27. No previous application for the relief sought he in has been made to the ZBA by Verizon Wireless in the last three (3) years, or any other entity in the Town, for the area variance approval sought herein. VII. CONCLUSION 28. Petitioners submit to this Board that all requirements necessary for the issuance of the requested area (setback) variance have been met by Verizon Wireless. A grant of the requested relief by the ZBA would be consistent with the "public utility" standard, the Town Code, the Town Law, the TCA, and this Board's prior relief g anted for the AT&T Facility. The requested area variance will allow Verizon Wireless to construct the proposed Communication Facility at the Property in order to provide reliable communication coverage to its customers, including emergency service agencies, within the Town. Finally, approval of the Application will further: (1) Congress' mandate for a rapid n 'tional deployment of wireless telecommunications services; and (2) Verizon Wireless provision of seamless, ubiquitous, reliable coverage to its users pursuant to the Wireless CommL nications and Public Safety Act of 1999. WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the ZBA grant the relief sought herein. Dated: November 11, 2016 Garden City,New York Respectfully submitted, AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC Attorneys for Petitioner 6616 Old Country Road, Suite 901 G�rden City,New York 11530 (5 6) 227-6363 12 r , r VERIFICATION RECEIVED STATE OF NEW YORK ) DEC 2 2016 ss.: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF NASSAU ) John Walden, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a Senior Engineer - Equipment for Verizon Wireless, lessee of the subject property located at 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, and the Petitioner in the within matter. As such, I have read the foregoing Petition and know the contents thereof; and that the same is true to my knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. The grounds of my belief as to all matters not stated upon my own knowledge are as follows: documents, site plans and construction drawings related to the proposed public utility communication facility. New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless /�zBy: / Name/John Walden Title: Senior Engineer- Equipment ��a Sworn to before me this eeaesa111"'to day ofd" 2016. °'J��oAgRy`F,p' Nn►� �lazes, -, ® J ;R0.01R16229645': _ _® (QUALIFIED IN :SUFFOLK COUNTY: Comm. � EX� N P c v '. 6i201 A ' ..........0...U •'44 13 EXHIBIT "A" RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS -Town of Southold, Now Yawk Telecommunications Site Review Consultants, Inc. 7050 West Palmetto Park Road,#15-652 CollecaUen AppNeatlon Boca Raton,FL 33433 Tel:877.438.2851 Fax:877.220.4593 July 14, 2016 Mr. Brian Cummings JUL I B Z016 Planner Town Hall Annex Building 53095 Route 25 Plannina Bioaf4CFT1/1=r)1 Southold,New York 11971 DEC 2 2016 RE: Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 20NING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of Southold - SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Mr. Cummings, At your request, on behalf of the Town of Southold ("Town"), CityScape Consultants, Inc. ('City Scape") in its capacity as telecommunications consultant for the Town,,has considered the merits of the above referenced application submitted by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Applicant") to install (collocate) its equipment on an existing concealed slick-stick tower. The existing structure is sixty-nine (69)feet tall. By means of this application, the Applicant is proposing to increase the height by twenty (20)feet for a new overall height of eighty-nine (89) feet and install its equipment on this new extension. The tower is located at the Orient by the Seas Marina &Restaurant, 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, see Figure 1, The purpose of the proposed modification is to improve the Applicant's service in the eastern area of Orient area since the nearest site is three miles to west at the Orient fire district station. Sport Structure&E-quipnient It is proposed to install three (3) panel antennas, two (2) diplexers and four(4) feed lines at the 84'6" level on the tower, all to be concealed within the outer walls of the structure, see Appendix, Exhibit A. There will also be additional equipment mounted within the existing fenced compound The referenced facility and tower has been designed and will be operated by the tower owner and professionals with expertise in telecommunications site design and construction. The facility has been designed to maximize the use of telecommunications facility and will have the capability to provide space for future collocation opportunities. Ground Compound The Applicant is proposing to extend the existing ground compound by adding a 13'10" X 32' area. The existing 13' tall fence will be extended to enclose this new area. Within this extended compound, a diesel generator will also be installed, see Appendix, Exhibit B. Landscaping trees will also be installed about this fenced area to match the existing landscape. It is also noted the proposal does not meet the side yard setback requirement of 25', listed in the Ordinance, bulk schedule for business, office and industrial districts. RECEIVED Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 Town of Southold-SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 C 7 , Page 2 °U Consultants, Inc. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Structural Analysis The Applicant submitted a structural analysis dated, February 26, 2015 and based on ANSI/EIA/TIA-222-G, Class II, Category D. Although the analysis does, not include the. proposed Verizon equipment, it does include the 20-foot height increase. Since this is a concealed facility, the antenna-elements are hidden from view and entirely shielded from the ; wind. Thus, any additional equipment added within the,outer shell not included in the analysis will not increase wind loading; it will only add weight. The structural analysis indicates that the 89-foot structure will be loaded to 71.5% while the foundation will be 31.5%, -see Appendix, Exhibit B. CityScape does not believe that the-proposed additions will significantly increase the loading, as explained above. Therefore, this analysis appears sufficient. Any future modifications to this structure should, however, include a revised analysis. Wireless applications, other than new support structures are governed under the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Tax Relief Act) and shall be afforded streamlined processing with a qualified application. A qualified application under the Tax Relief Act cannot increase in size of the ground compound, or tower structural' changes increasing the height or girth 'by ten percent (10%) or twenty (20) feet, whichever is greater. While the proposed 20-foot increase in height would meet the collocation requirements, the extension to the ground compound does not. Therefore, this application needs to be considered,in a public hearing. Granting the setback variance is at the Town's'discretion. Should the Town grant this setback variance, as all other technicat requirements appear in order, Cityscape recommends approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. All of Applicant's feed lines/cables shall be installed inside the monopole structure; and, 2. All ports shall remain sufficiently sealed to prevent access by birds and other wildlife; and, 3. The Applicant shall confirm the generator will comply with the Southold Ordinance noise guidelines; and, 4. The facility shall remain secured and protected from unauthorized personnel.. I certify that to the best of my knowledge all of the information included herein is accurate at the time of this report. CityScape is only employed by,local governments and has unbiased opinions. All recommendations are based on technical merits without prejudice, according to prevailing laws and codes. Respectfully submitted, Jonathan N. Edwards,P.E. Cityscape Consultants, Inc. RECEIVED Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 Town of Southold-SCTM 41000-15-9-8.1 `I' DEC 20 0 m Page 3 ` Consultants, Inc. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS D®Lorme Stn®t Atlas U5A®2001 mss• �� s 7' K� S 41 e S a �,Pvs'�dJ F 4a ; ttS-0 �Y Dula use subject to license 0 DeLomme DeLomie Street Atlas USA's 2009 0 600 1600 m2460 3200 4000 www delomre com MN(13 9°M Data Zoom 13-0 Figure 1 — Site Location Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 Town of Southold-SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 �' } ' 'llans t Page 4 Consultants, Inc. RECEIVED OEC 2 2016 BONING BOARD OF APPEALS Apppndix Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 Town of -SCTM#1000-15-M.1 ' �_EMU M Mage 5 Consultants, Inc. RECEIVED DEC 2096 ,_,... 1 Wi�.Y?SLD I~ ZONING EOARD OF APPEALS ZO [�2G�Y RITNTL Ei.a, I z MCI to A1211114+5'i �p L AND 1G)NiN11ONE4)I iY tJ16YYvCHS IttVhttid;l K 1 LJ W EXIENS�ON OF S C] EXISTING MONOPOLE^- W N ' O C) EXISTING M CONCEALMENT ! (L POLE WITH PROPOSED'.v- EXTENSION s I , li (12)PROP05LO VERIZON WIRELESS 7/810 ANIENKAS CABLES ROUTED WiTHiN Y E%ISTINO CONCEALMENT POSE {'M(3•'�74L1 llti,,&%YJ110 A)k.k AND WES OF I�wiNv..EO YEFJZON WIRELESS EY:,�A2•TT7fFS AROUND AT&T COUPOUNO.REFER TO SITE P;ldl 11G°:.}Tr2f7 ATW q:IA'.,k!S@:.ltP..E4' PROPOSED 13'-0'RION CJWN LINK FENCING WITH PRIVACY SLATS F4)FRG7a£p VERI20N WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED WEATHER .f POLE^E.`EO Vi;T:,20N x,R'EI T55'EGU3+U;IN CABINETS AND SED OtFSEL UC OLkEfVl{d4 A.9t".iCSY7{E(N:LfBY.tJr�1 SCA INET PROPOSED F11VAT&D 01,111x11E0✓ILEI.PLATFORM ^..• WYORID•TN, MAW 160)O!CAGE IM W6,i','x or PROPOSED VEWON WrFLLSS C4U. D,)fT t41T4i1 EtISIISN+7A£2S t3f30N0 AT&T COMPOUND.REFER t y7 rAr PLA4 111.9`.,.1iYi%&'"t"011$tin:0G?'..a1 G E'H:. �FENCN IN EQUIPMENT AREA TO PEUNN - E%ISTNG TREES AROUND EXISTING AT&T COMPOUND TO L/ Ltx, ',��' f( � c� d � -P '. '^"«.^°"'"' x•-•8 x..:. � � �M_ mrwrg Ro°� .� . t 611 ( ) E I 1 1 1 FC�ieQ..... 4ERTLCN PRAEIESS NEUCAL PO.ES(k20' 4ECP/i.W RLTT P7ETlB WITH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE A. CAP Exhibit A— Support Structure 1 � Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 Town of Southold-SGTM �T #!1000-15-9-8.1AM> !' n . Page 6 Consultants, Inc. RECEIVED DEC 2 2010 ,2dNING 60ARD OF APPEALS --•-PROPOSED VERiZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE WITH(12)PROPOSED LEASE 7/6-0 ANTENNA GBLES DASHED UNE REPRESENTS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (3)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS NAIN DISTRIBUTION BOXES WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE ' w MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME 1 .. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP (12)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRH UNITS(STACKED) } PROPOSED 2026 S.F.STEEL DUNNAGE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME-' w .•w - - q l ` WITH PROPOSED WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS STEEL STAIR ,-� `1 PROPOSED ENCLOSURE WIRELESS LDKW DIESEL V GENERATOR WITH SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOSED ELEVATED GSTEEL ENERATOR ,�.__. ; «#js•H^•^m• ......_waa x=— „"'_'.'—k.. ,-''LaY;, 1 k DUNNAGE CPLATFORM DIESEL TANK CONTAINED WITHIGENLRATOR ENCLOSURE) _ K_ x—x_K _vr'. . ...._.. a ..�;. 14 -7-MRS m 75 F-i )� »�: '... y:r .`...' >« . ..,,., p1AfflN3lS (tl t� .—`t _�=r.” .:a::: �r.• �� —57—,-" (..�..y..y.... seams,^-- s MOTOR } -„. 1Mx FULLY SHIEUDED FLOOD (] (1 L _N u LIGHTS MOUNTED TO WFATHFR rANOPY POSTS ' BENEATH WEATHER CANOPY.TYPICAL FOR(3) k REFER TO DETAIL TOM *�' _ w m N K I(4)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO EXISTING AT&T PLATFORM d9t.T.5^ +, x PROPOSED WEATHER CAM PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH PRIVACY SLATS PROPOSED 4'-0-WIDE SWING GATE- - •— " •,�",J '+�.\ PROPOSED CANOPY POST,TYP,FOR(6) PROPOSED VER1704 WIRELESS TELCO CONDUIT 11'+140EIT 1'Rn, � __. ,,.. .,„(9)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS HELICAL PILES(t2O' PROPOSED VER1204 NtREl.E55 TELCO CABIN 1i7 Lri'ri1t1':AaF DEEP/CONCRETE PIERS WITH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE PILE CAP SPAN CABINET WITHIN EXISTING AT&T CO POUND 0' NORTH Exhibit B— Ground Compound Verizon Wireless—Orient Point 2 �2_ ,lt-2 Town of Southold-SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 RECEIVED s � �'' �y�y p4� p.� � @ad6wltGV`X .bili Page 7 DEC 2' 2010 Consultants, Inc. GPD Engineering and Architecture Pratrssianal corporation AT&T Towers Kevin Clements 2300 Northlake Center Dr.,Suite 405 '520 South Main Street,Suite 2531 Tucker,GA 300844032 Akron,OH 44311 (330)572-3546 kclementsftpdgroup.com CPD#2015723.01.48780.02 February 26,2015 RIGOROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT WITH MODIFICAITON DESIGN AT&T DESIGNATION: Site USID: 48780 Site FA: 10107374 Verizon Site Name: ORIENT POINT Site Name: EAST ORIENT POINT AT&T Project: Verizon Extension Tower Only Co-location 10.29.2014 ANALYSIS CRITERIA: Codes: TIA•222-G 120-mph(3-second gust)with 0"ice 50-mph(3-second gust)with 0.75"ice SITE DATA: 40200 Main Road,Orient,NY 11957,Suffolk County Latitude 41°919.9"N,Longitude 720 14'38"W Market:NYCINNJ 69'Valmont Stealth Monopole w/proposed 20'extension Mr.Reggie Barrau, GPD is pleased to submit this Rigorous Structural Analysis Report with Modification Design to determine the structural integrity of the aforementioned tower, The purpose of the analysis is to determine the suitability of the tower with the existing and proposed loading configuration detailed in the analysis report. Analysis Results Tower Stress Level with Proposed Equipment: 71.5% Pass Foundation Ratio with Proposed Equipment: 31.5% Pass Note: In order for this analysis results to be valid for the proposed,existing,and reserved loading in Appendix A the modifications referenced in the design drawings by GPD(Project#:2015723.01.48780.02,dated 2/26/2015)must be installed. We at GPD appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and AT&T Towers. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please do not hesitate to call. �OF NiFoy'"w Respectfully submitted, 1;` t t •IT t;)A'9°.�a`c:;,,,.CF 11t!f V.. ." John N.Kabak,P.E. New York fk:090039-1 920 514uth M'i,n Street.Suis 25 1 ,-,r ,(�M,:•.,.t t l s:l,%ia.i,1.itab.Fax 330.572-2101.www,GPDGroup.com GFD ftneertng and Architecture Professional Corporarlon Exhibit C— Structural Analysis Summary EXHIBIT "B" RECEIVED OEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 � , ti FCC WTB Radio Station Authorization � A�C�� RE'CETVED Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau C 2 2h16 Radio Station Authorization (Reference Copy Only) i�I1lU T3C)A17b 0E APPEALS This is not an official FCC license. It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting, or display of an FCC license, this.document may not be used in place of an official FCC license. Licensee: Celleo Partnership FCC Registration Number, ATTN Regulatory 00 03290673 Cellco Partnership Call Sign: File 1120 Sanctuary Pkwy,#150 GASA5REG KNLH264 Number: ; Alpharetta,GA 30004 : 0003047719 i Radio Service: -� CW-PCS Broadband Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 07/23/2007 ( 07/23/2007 06/27/2017 07/26/2007 Market Plumber: BTA321 Channel Block: F� _ Sub-Market Designator:0 nc Market Nae: New York,NY � 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date : 3rd wild-out Date 4th Build-out Date 06/27/2002 Special Conditions or Waivers/Conditions This authorization is subject to the condition,that, in _r the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory(Canada/United States), future coordination of any base station transmitters within 72 km(45 miles)of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harmful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries, This authorization is conditioned upon the full and timely payment of all monies due pursuant to Sections 1.2110 and 24,716 of the Commission's Rules and the terms of the Commission's installment plan as set forth in the Note and Security Agreement executed by the licensee. Failure to comply with this condition will result in the automatic cancellation of this authorization. Conditions of 2 I RECEIVED PCC WTB Radio Station Authorization <If- 10ITEC 2 2016 Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,47 U.S.C. S BOR pPPBALS •309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C, Section 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, See 47 U.S.C. Section 606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license,go to the Universal Licensing System _ (ULS)homepage at httMflwireless.fcc on-1111"and select "License,Search".Follow the instruction on how to search for license information TFCC 601 -IMM September 2002 fel,..... ~ i i t oft R �ag3 REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license.It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting,or display of an FCC license,this document may not be used'in place of an official FCC license. Federal Communications Commission X � 2096 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 8�� iJ SOAP OF APPEAL RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign Pi Number KNKA206 0006358273 ATTN: REGULATORY Radio Service NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED•PARTNERSFHP CL-Cellular 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY;-#150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 Market Numer Channel Block CMA, 01 B Sub-Market Designator FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003473220 0 Market Name New York,NY-NJ/Nassau-Suffolk - Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Five Yr Build-Out Date Print Date 09-03-2014 09-03-2014 10-01-2024 09-03-2014 Site Information: Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters), (meters) Registration No. 2 40-50-32.0 N 073-01-33.0 W 89.6 : 93.0 1043284 Address: ADIRONDACK DR 300 FT S OF MIDVALE City: SELDEN County:SUFFOLK State:NY Construetion,Deadling" '14 . Antenna:4 Azimuth(from tnie north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 86.100 83.100 83.800 99.800 106.000", 93.200 84,600 81.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 33.190 240.450 576.810 458,170 162.570 10.500 1.210 1,660 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 86.100 83.100 83.800 99.800 106.000 93.200 84.600 81.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.110 0 100 0.150 1.780 9.770 15.850 8.510 1.350 Antenna, 6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 t35 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 86.100 83.100 83.800 99.800 106.000 93.200 84.600 81.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 14 460 5 130 0.600 0 100 0 100 0.390 3.470 13.180 Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h)of the Coin munications Act of 193=1,as amended,47 U.S.C.§309(h),this license is subject to the following conditions: Thus license shalt not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein, Neither the license noir the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U S C § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by§706 of the C:omrnunications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 C1.S.C. §606. FCC 601-C Paoe I of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206. . File Number: 0006358273 Print Date: 09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 3 40-51-18.2 N" 072-46-08.9 W 743 155.4 1004116 Address: CR I I I.&EASTPORT MANOR RD City: MANORVILLE 'County: SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from trtie,north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 106,000 95.800 98.200 115.600 114.800 109.100 95,700 94.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.190 15,850 38.020 30.200 6.760 0.690 0.100 0.110 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north),' 60:, 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters);' ; '{106,000 95.800 98.200 115.600 114.800 109.100 95.700 94.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,290 0.100 0.380 4.470 24.550 39.810 21,380 3.390 Antenna: 6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 106.000 95.800 98.200 115.600 114.800 109.100 95.700 94.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 91.200„ 32.360 3.800 0.200 0.200 2.450 21.880 83,180 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 4 40-52-,10.0 N 072-34-35,0 W 54.8 51,8 1003626 Address: 1 MI N OF N SIDE OLD COUNTRY RD&E END AVE City: EAST QUOGUE County:SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 74.500 77.000 77.300 80,700 80.500 76,500 42.200 66,400 "Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0.100 , 1.620 15.850 31.620 13.490 1.230 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 ' ' 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 74.500 77,000 77.300 80.700 80.500 76,500 42,200 66.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 28,180 7,240 0.410 0.190 0.100 0.200 4.170 23.440 Antenna: 4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 74.500 77,000 77,300 80,700 80.500 76,500 42.200 66.400 "Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.580 8.910 29.510 21.380 3.240 0.130 0.100 0.100 �ECEYV'ED ZONING 130ARD OF p,PPEALS FCC 601-C Page 2 of 22 August 2007 7 v�� Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude; Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 5 40-5.1-37.4 N `" 073-25-26.4 W 73.1 52.7 Address: BOXER COURT City: HUNTINGT'ON, ,' .unty: SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 4 Azimuth framFtrue'tiorth) 0. 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 �, Antenna Height AAT(meters) >•'�`1'20.200 106.100 67,600 72,900 77.100 65.000 78.500 111,500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5,500 39.810 95.500 75.860 16,980 L740 0,200 0,280 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters), 120.200 106,100 67,600 72.900 77.100 65.000 78.500 111.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,720 0.200 0.950 11.220 61.660 100,000 53.700 8.510 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 , ° 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 120.200 106.100 67,600 72.900 77.100 65,000 78.500 111.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 10 940 3180,, 0.460 0.100 0.100 0.290 2,630 9.980 Location Latitude Longitude :-Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 6 40-59-37.0 N 072-10-17,0 W 27:4`' 107.6 1003631 Address: SPRINGS FIREPLACE RD&:ABRAHAM PATH City:EAST HAMPTON County:SUFFOLK State:NY- Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90'•.` 935 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 77,100 79,500 74.900 .77.500 76.500 73.600 68.000 74.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5,500 39,810 95.500 75.86,0 16.980 1.740 0.200 0.280 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 '`` 186 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 77 100 79.500 74.900 77.500 . 76.500 73,600 68,000 74.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,720 0.200 0.950 11.226 61.660 100,000 53.700 8.510 Antenna: 6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 77,100 79.500 74.900 77,500 76.5.00 ''' 73.600 68.000 74.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 91.200 32,360 3.800 0200 0.200 2.450 21.880 83.180 RECEIVED DEC 201 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 3 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206,,)'11 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude, Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 41-09-3,0:3'N' , 074-10-43.5 W 213.4 36.6 Address: MUNICIPAL,WATER PROPERTY CORNER OF HILLSIDE-ROAD AND COUNCIL CREST RD. City: SLOATSBURG:`. County:ROCKLAND State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0-;` 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters)' 40.000 -27.600 80.100 109,700 117,100 94.300 44,700 -0.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.190 15.850 35,480 27.540 6.310 0.190 0.100 0.180 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) .,0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 40.000 -27.600 80,100 109.700 1.17.100 94.300 44.700 -0.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.2304, 0.120 0.120 0.980 27,540 57.540 18,620 0.120 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) .,0„_-'' 4S 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 40.000 -27.b00 80,100 109.700 117.100 94.300 44.700 -0.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 3,270 .,'; 0:380 0,100 0.100 0.100 0,100 0.240 2.720 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meiers) (meters) Registration No. 8 41-30-553 N 073-39-48.5 W 307.9 52.4 Address: 183 DENTON LAKE ROAD City:HOLMES County:PUTNAM State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:2 Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90: 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 114.400 130,500 114:800 172.200 188,400 110,300 146,500 196.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.350 0.400 11.480` 27,540 38.020 38.020 26.300 8.320 Location Latitude Longitude Ground El6ation,-1,5tructure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 9 41-07-12,3 N 073-42-38,5 W 112.8 48.8 Address: 115 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE - City: ARMONK County:WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 29.400 -1.600 60.400 102.000 70,000 50,000 74.200 8.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5.500 30.900 91.200 70.790 9A20 0.450 0.600 0.650 Antenna: 5 Azirnuth(from true north) 0" 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 29,400 -1,600 60.400 102.000 70.000 50.000 74.200 8.400 'Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.320 0,490 1.580 10.000 52.480 104.710 43.650 3.550 'ecelvED 0Ec � n1G 2ZOMING 130ARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 4 of 3? :August 2007 3 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERS}-IIP Call Sign: KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 9 41-07-123 N' 073-42-38,5 W 112.8 48.8 Address: 115 BUSL'VESS PARK DRIVE City: ARMONK' Cotiaty: WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 6 Azimuth(from true north), . 0. 45 90 135 I80 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) a"?g,Qpp _1.600 60.400 102,000 70.000 50.000 74.200 8.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 97.720 19.950 1.550 0.500 0.460 3.160 18.200 72.440 Location Latitude Longitude;,: Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 10 41-01-55.1 N 071=58-29.7 W.• 55.8 39.6 1277101 Address:(Montauk Point)2214 Montauk Highway City: MONTAUK County: SUFFOLK- State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) - 4 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 81.700' 78.400• 25.900 25.900 25.900 68.900 81.000 81,700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.720 1I.390 47.480 30.650 3.440 0.110 0,100 0.100 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45,. : 90,.-,• 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 81.700 78.400 25,9Q0 25.900 25.900 68.900 81,000 81.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0:140 1.890 22 720 50.870 18.050 1.280 Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 81.700 78.400 25.900 25,900 25.900 68.900 81.000 81,700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 39,760 8.480 0.340', 0,100 0.100 0.260 4.740 34.100 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation. Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 13 40.24-46,4 N 074-36-05.3 W 95.7 86.6 1056213 Address:(Kendall Park) 63 OLD GEORGETOWN ROAD City: KENDALL PARK County: SOMERSET State: NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 7 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 109.600 103.100 96.900 IO2.200 107.700 84 200 73 200 93.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 3.490 214.110 372.310 16.910 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 Antenna-8 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 109 600 103 100 96.900 102.200 107,700 84.200 73.200 93.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 1.000 1.000 4.260 59.950 331.490 159.740 9.870 1.000 RECEIVED DEC 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Paga 5 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-.03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 13 40=24-46.4 N 074-36-05.3 W 95.7 86.6 1056213 Address:(Kendall Park)63 OLD GEORGETOWN ROAD City:KENDALL PARK;" County: SOMERSET State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 9 Azimuth(from true riorth) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 109.600 103.100 96.900 102.200 107,700 84.200 73.200 93.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 345.470 32.240 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.510 25.670 294.040 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure 119t to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No, 16 41-06-36.4 N 072-21-53.3 W, 2.0 29,9 Address: Washington Ave City: GREENPORT County:SUFFOLK' State: NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 31,000 , 30.500 31.000 24.800 24.600 25.500 31.000 31.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 1.700 26.300 87.100 63.100 9.550 0.370 0.190 0.190 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45, 90' 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 31.000 30.500 31.000 24.80Q -24.600 25.500 31.000 31.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.190 0.190 0'.190 4,780 36.060 56.320 32.620 3.610 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 31.000 30 500 31.000 24 800 24.600 25.500 31.000 31.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 52.920 19.530 1,100 0.190 0.190 0.510 11.910 46.810 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 17 41-25-54.9N 073-52-49.6 W 345.0 113.1 1010179 Address: ROUTE 301 WEST(088155) City:PUTNAM VALLEY County:PUTNAM State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 .180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 225.700 135.400 192.000 236.600 ""303.500 313.300 291-.600 307.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2,720 1.500 0.160 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.390 1.640 'XeCeYVe'D NG$OARD O� PppepU5 FCC 601-C Page 6 of 22 August 2007 "h t I 1 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude;;, Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure ' (meters) (meters) Registration No. 18 40-56-25.0 N''``' 074-36-46,7 W 330.7 66.1 1057470 Address:0.6 MILES SE OF LAKE HOPATCONG City: DOVER County:.MORRIS State: NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -73.600 62.100 130.200 158,500 103.700 48.300 99.500 104.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.680 0.680 0.680 1.860 25 760 11.740 1.480 0.680 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north)' 0' ' 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 73,600 62.100 130.200 158.500 103,700 48,300 99.500 104,700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 1.320 0.430 0,430 0,430 0.490 5.620 199.530 77.620 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0. 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 73, 600 62:100 130.200 158.500 103.700 48.300 99,500 104.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 36.440 . 34.350 0.580 0.430 0.430 0.430 1,000 0.430 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 19 40-52-44.4 N 074-45-46.6 W 342:8' ,_ 28,7 Address:TWP.OF MT. OLIVE WATER TANK CAMELOT DRIVE City: BUDD LAKE County: MORRIS State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 157.200 83,300 99;900 1,28,700 110.600 202.400 166,100 164.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.370 0.370 17.130. 20.130 1940 0.430 0.370 0.370 Antenna, 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 1'35 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 157.200 83.300 99.900 128;700 110.600 202.400 166.100 164,300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.370 0.370 0.3"70 0.930 0.370 56.170 49.630 0,540 Antenna:6 Azimuth'(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 157.200 83.300 99.900 128.700 110.600 202.400 166.100 164.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.840 3.390 0.980 0,370 0.370 0.370 0.370 2,100 RFCEIVE)D c 70NIMG BOARD OF APPAL 601-C Page 7 of 22 August 2007 ! r Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206 File!Number: 0006358273 Print Date: 09-03-2014 Location Latitude`. Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 20 41-01-48ANI '" 072-29-49.3 W 16.8 399 Address:21855 COUNTY.ROAD#48 City: CUTCHOGUE Cqunty: SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 55.800 51.800 54.200 48.900 54.600 47.800 55.600 55.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) '2.130 13.700 23.940 21.700 6-.510 0.610 0.100 0,100 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north), 0. 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) '55.800 51.800 54.200 48.900 54.600 47.800 55.600 55.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0:200 0.100 0.290 4,420 17.140 20.450 15.920 3.370 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north)' (} ,»` 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 55,800 51.800 54.200 48.900 54.600 47,800 55.600 55.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 3.770 '1,860,, 0,240 0.100 0.100 0.140 1.310 3.640 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure ' (meters) (meters) Registration No. 22 40-43-32.4 N 073-14-28.4 W 3.0 38.4 Address:301 EAST MAIN STREET City: BAY SHORE County:SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna.4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 18o 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 6.200 15.800 32.600 34.100 34.100 33.700 20.800 -7.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5.500 39.810 95.500 75.860 16.980 1.740 0.200 0.280 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 ,135"' 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 6.200 15,800 32.600 34:100,. 34.100 33.700 20.800 -7.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0 290 0,100 0.380 4,470 24.550 39.810 21.380 3.390 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 - 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 6.200 15.800 32.600 34.100 34,100 ' 33.700 20:800 -7.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 36.310 12.810 1.510 0.100 0.100 0.980 8,710 33.110 RECEIVED DEC S 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C flage 8 of 22 ,%ugust 2007 r � 417 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206� ' . File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude` Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to'rip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 23 40-40-19.0 M�, 073-27-21.0 W 5.4 58,5 1008314 Address: INT SAINT REGIS& MAY PL City:MASSA PEQUA PARK-` County:NASSAU State:NY Construction Deadline: 3 Antenna 4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -7.200 21.500 36.900 37.700 37.700 37.700 30.600 11.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) -0,880 4.940 14.590 11.330 1,460 0.100 0,100 0.100 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0" , 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(rneters) -7.200 21.500 36,900 37,700 37.700 37,700 30.600 1100 Transmittingwatts , ERP(watts) � 0,600 0.260 0.260 1.290 36.310 128.820 33.880 1,100 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 . x. ;'; 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -7.200 21.500 36.900 37.700 37.700 37.700 30,600 11.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 38.900 .. 7.940• 0.620 0.200 0.180 1.260 7.240 28,840 Location Latitude Longitude 'Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 24 40-57-24.4 N 072-49-20.4 W 67:11 23.2 Address: GERALD STREET City:WADING RIVER County:SUFFOLK State:NY>-�:C'onstruction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90�_ "'135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 89,700 89.700 64.400 57 .400 72.700 63.000 50.400 89.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2,200 15.920 38,200" 30.340_ 6,790 0.700 0.100 0,110 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 89.700 89.700 64.400 57.400' 72.700 63.000 50.400 89.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.290 0.100 0,380 4,490 24.660 40,000 21,480 3.400 Antenna: 6 Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 89,700 89,700 64,400 57.400 72.700 63,000 50:400 89,700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5.700 2.020 0.240 0.100 0.100 0.150 1.370 5200 RECEIVED DEC 2 `t016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 9 of 22 August 2007 % 1 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 25 40-31-39.4N 074-12-51.5 W 25.9 25.0 Address: 1870 DRUMGOOLE ROAD City: STATEN ISLAND Coanty:RICHMOND State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 42.200 -4.600 44,100 44,700 34 400 28.600 17.900 30.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 19,770 80.540 76,910 17.620 1.370 0.190 0.190 1.980 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north).- 0�'- 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) ?42.200 -4.600 44.100 44,700 34,400 2$:600 17.900 30.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) -0.540 0.100 0,100 0.790 7.870 32.060 30.620 7.010 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 42.200 -41600 44.100 44.700 34.400 28,600 17.900 30.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 76,910 17.620 1 370 0.190 0.190 1.980 19.770 80,540 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to'tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 26 41-15-30.5N 073-32-05.0 W 231.7 48.8 Address:NEAR INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 123&ROUTE 35 City: SOUTH SALEM County: WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:2,Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 61.900 96.700 117.700 145.000 150.300 119 900 160.200 125 600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 4.070 0.230 0.230 3.390 27.540 97.720 102.330 34.670 Location latitude Longitude Ground Elevation, Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 27 40-56-49.4 N 072-53-49 4 W 42.1 35A Address: (Shoreham site)CORNER RT 25A&TELSA STREET City: SHOREHAM County: SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline:, Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 73.200 73.200 42 700 51,400 51.300 37,800 30.400 73.200 1'ransmitting ERP(Watts) 2,190 86.070 264,150 206.940 25.280 1-09Q 0.760 0.670 Antenna.5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 31.5 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 73.200 73 200 42.700 51,400 51 300 37.800 30.400 73.200 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,560 0.560 1 070 10,740 148.540 281,090 129.670 5 730 (RECEIVED OEC 201 Zl341MG BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 001-C Pauc 10 of 22 kugust 2007 r Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206",1,,<_ File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude " Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 27 40-56-49.4 N 072-53-49.4 W 42.1 35.4 Address: (Shoreham site)CORNER RT 25A&TENSA STREET City: SHOREHAM County:SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AA'r(meters) ; 73.200 73.200 42.700 51.400 51.300 37.800 30.400 73.200 Transmitting ERP(watts) 262.330 57.520 0.560 0.560 0.560 1.310 32.420 209.820 Location Latitude Longitude'. Ground Elevation Structure Mgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 28 40-24-06.4 N 074-38-49.6 W 46.3 35.1 Address: YOUNG DRIVE City: ROCKY HILL County:SOMERSET State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 47.600 45.100 24.700 45.500 44.300 13.500 -8.300 0.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5,500 39.810 95.500 75.860 16,980 1.740 0.200 0.280 Antenna:5 Azimuth(front true north) 0 45. , " 90'_ 135 180 22.5 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) 47.600 45.100 24.700 45.500 44.300 13.500 -8.300 0.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.290 0.100 0.3$0 4.490 24.660 40.000 21.480 3.400 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90,'�.� 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 47.600 45.100 24.700 45.500 44.300 13.500 -8.300 0.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 16 500 10.780 1.430 0.100 0.100 0.840 7.960 16.550 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 30 40-53-05 4 N 073-17-49 4 W 79,2 42.1 Address: GUN CLUB ROAD City: EAST NORTHPORT County:SUFFOLK State: NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 108.200 109,300 68.200 84.000 75.300 50.200 73.400 104.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0 880 6.370 15.280 12.140 2.720 0.280 0.100 0.100 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 108.200 109,300 68.200 84.000 75.300 50.200 73.400 104.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.720 0.200 0.950 11.220 61.660 100.000 53,700 8.510 1�1:CE�'VE® DFC � 201 50APX�OV FCC 601-C Page 1 1 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude' Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 30 40-53-05.4 N 073-17-49 4 W 79.2 42.1 Address: GUN CLUB ROAD City:EAST NORTHPQRT County:SUFFOLK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true"north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) _ x,10$.200 109.300 68.200 84,000 75.300 50.200 73.400 104.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 14,590 5;180 0"610 0,1.00 0.100 0.390 3.500 13.310 Location Latitude Lon, iudC-,-", Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 31 40-35-56.4 N 073-45-12.5 W 8.5 51.5 Address: 327 BEACH 19TH STREET City: FAR ROCKAWAY County: QUEENS State: NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 41.500 48.500• 56.600 56.700 56.700 56.700 55.700 49.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.200 15.930 38.200 30.350 6.790 0.700 0,100 0.110 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45, , 90135 180 22.5 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 41.500 48.500 56.90 56.700 56.700 56.700 55,700 49 300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.290 0,100• 0380 4.490 24.670 40.000 21.480 3.400 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 41.500 48.500 56.600 56.700 56.700 56.700 55.700 49.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.290 0.810 0,160-• 0,100 0,100 0.100 0.550 2.090 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 33 40-37-47.4 N 074-18-11.5 W 18.5 27,7 Address: 100 WALNUT AVENUE City: CLARK County: UNION State: NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 4 Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -24.500 26.700 33.800 30.000 19.500 10.600 -16.400 -34.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 1"210 9.320 16.520 14.560 4.330 0.330 0.100 0,100 Antenna: 5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -24.500 26.700 33"800 30.000 19.500 10.600; -16.400 -34.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.200 0.100 0.310 2.700 20.510 40.000 17.060 2,200 FCC 601-C Page 12 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: KNKA206' File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitu'de', Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 33 40-37=47.4N 074-18-11.5W 18.5 27.7 Address: 100 WALNUT AVENUE City:CLARK County:,yMPN State:N1 Construction Deadline: Antenna:6 Azimuth(from tnie`north), 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) ;.;-24.500 26.700 33.800 30.000 19.500 10.600 -16°400 -34.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) °19.880 8.160 0 870 0 t00 0.100 0.540 5.690 18.260 Location Latitude Lo' gitude. Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to'rip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 34 40-34-22.4 N 074-3346.6 W ' 27.7 46.5 Address:9 EASY STREET City: BOUND BROOK County: SOMERSET State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 '45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -34.200_; 45.900 49:900 53.000 41.700 44.700 29.700 -5.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 27.830 :'25.684 J1940 0.300 0.100 0.100 0.240 2.980 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 96-,., 135 180 225 270 315 9 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -34.200 -45.900 49,900 53.000 41.700 44,700 29.700 -5.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.850 28.t90 30.960 27.230 0°510 0.100 0.100 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 4.5 90<. 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -34.200 45,900 49.900 53.000 41.700 44.700 29.700 -5.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.140 0.430 4.320 73.770 69.590 43.870 0.890 0.160 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation. Structure IIgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 35 41-00-31,4 N 074-30-53.6 W 231.2 39.2 Address: 5470 BERKSHIRE VALLEY ROAD City:JEFFERSON County:MORRIS State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -72.000 10,400 34.200 46.400 40.700 -54.600 -52.80,0 -11.500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 3.090 30.200 93°330 66.070 11.220 1.050 0.200 0.300 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 4.5 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -72.000 10,400 34,200 46.400 40.700 -54.600. 52.800 -11,500 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.500 0.200 0.780 6 760 51.290 100:000 42.660 5.500 R�cEYvleD j3OARD OF 4PP5ALS FCC 601-C Page 13 of 22 August 2007 I Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSMP Call Sign:KNKA206, _ File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude'„ ?' Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure ' (meters) (meters) Registration No. 35 41-00-31:4 W°' 074-30-53,6 W 231,2 39.2 Address: 5470 BERKSHIRE.VALLEY ROAD City: JEFFERSOl'4 County:MORRIS State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) .0,, 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) '=72.000 10.400 34.200 46.400 40.700 -54.600 -52.800 -11.500 Transmitting ERP (watts) 89.130 23.440 2.290 0.200 0,200 1.510 15.140 75.860 Location Latitude Lorigifude;:yr Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 36 40-35.08.4 N 073'- 7-22:5 W 3.0 27.7 Address: 26-85 HOMECREST AVENUE '`--.•. City: BROOKLYN County:KINGS`-,:, State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 4S 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 11.700w 21.700 24.700 25A00 25.300 25.300 10.700 17.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.110 1.200 0.670 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 .. f90: 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 11.700 21.700 24.700 25.100 25.300 25.300 10.700 17,800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,100 0.100 0:100 0.100 0.360 1.290 0.340 0,100 Antenna:6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90.', 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 16,500 26.500 29.500 29,900 30.100 30.100 15,500 22.600 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2,630 0.330 0.100 0,100 0,100 0.100 0,100 1.950 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation. Structure llgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 41 41-09-03.6 N 074-01-38.0 W 165.3 - 39.0 Address:430 New Hempstead Road,0& R substation City:New Hempstead County:ROCKLAND State:NY Construction Deadiipet 04-26-2001 Antenna:4 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28.900 145.800 149.000 139.700 109.500 40.900 6,600 -78.700 Transmitting ERP (watts) 1.700 26 300 87,100 63.100 9.550 0.370 0 190 0.190 Antenna:5 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28.900 145,800 149,000 139.700 109.500 40.900 6.600 -78.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.190 0.190 0.220 4.790 46.770 93.330 39.810 3.630 RECEIVED DEC 2 'Z016 70NING BOARD OF APPEALS NCC 601-C Page 14 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNER HIP 0 S Call Sign:KNKA206, , ; File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude`. Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 41 41.09-03,6 N 074-01-38.0 W 165.3 39.0 Address: 430 New'Hempstead Road,O& R substation City:New Hempstead County:ROCKLAND State: NY Construction Deadline:04-26-2001 Antenna: 6 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 ,Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28.900 145.800 149.000 139.700 109.500 40,900 6 600 -78.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 83.180 21.380 1.200 0,190 0.190 0.600 12.300 69,180 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 44 40-52-22.4 N 073-53-13.5 W 42.5 24.4 Address: 3210 Grand Concourse City: Bronx County: BRONX State:;NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 22.400', 20:000* 59.800 58.000, 52.500 46,100 43.000 27.300 Transmitting FRP(watts) 0.140 0:780 2.290 1.780 0.230 0.100 0.100 0.100 Antenna-2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 '90111',. 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 22.400 20,000 59.800 58.000 52.500 46.100 43.000 27.300 Transmitting FRP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.910 3.240 0,850 0.100 Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90� 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 22.400 20.000 59.800 58.000 52.500 46.100 43.000 27.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2,040 2.190 0.360 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.600 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No, 45 40-47-03.4 N 073-38-40.5 W 40.8 51.5 Address: 250 Willis Ave City: Albertson County:NASSAU State: NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: I Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 54.900 34.200 19.500 49.300 53.900 46.100 50.100 58.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.880 6.340 15.210 12.080 2.710 0.280 01100 0,100 Antenna 2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 54.900 34.200 19.500 49,300 53.900 46.100 50.100 58.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0.100 0,100 2.300 8.170 2.150 0.100 RECEIVED DEC 206 ZQ�\!JNG BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 15 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206, File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude-- Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 45 40-47-03.4 N'- 073-38-40.5 W 40.8 51.5 Address: 250 Willis Ave City: Albertson County:NASSAU State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 54,900 34.200 19,500 49.300 53.900 46.100 50.100 58.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 15.570 3,180 0.250 0.100 0.100 0.500 2,900 11,540 Location Latitude Longitude`, Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 46 40-44-09,4 N 073-59-18'5 W 11.5 48.2 Address:33 Irving Place City:New York County:NEW YORK' State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: I Azimuth(from true north) 0 . , 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) 24.100 52.600 42.500 46.800 40.700 55.000 50.100 44.100 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.650 2.000 1.290 0.190 0.100 0.100 0.100 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45.,� . 90'.. 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 24.100 52:600 42,500 46.800 40.700 55.000 50.100 44.100 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,100 0.100 0,100 0,130 1.150 2;050 0.800 0.100 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 1 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 24.100 52.600 42.500 46.800 40.700 55.000 50.100 44.100 Transmitting ERP(watts) 4.280 0.440 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.330 3.250 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevition, Structure 11gt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (Mh eters) Registration No. 47 40-41-29.3 N 073-51-04.5 W 12.5 23.5 Address: 91-48 88th Rd City:Jamaica County:NEW YORK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: I Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 27.300 14.900 21.700 31.100 33,500 28.500 19,600 14,700 'i'ransmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.280 3.050 1,710 0.160 0.100 0.100 0.100 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 27.300 14.900 21,700 31.100 33.500 28.500 19.600 14,700 'Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,100 0 100 0.100 0.100 0.920 3.270 0.860 0.100 fiECEY�E� OEC 50PRD OV APMAl„ FCC 601-C Page 16 of 22 August 2007 1 _ Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206• File Number: 0006358273 Print Date: 09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 47 40-41-29.3 N 073-51-04.5 W 12.5 23.5 Address: 91-48 88th Rd City:Jamaica County:,NEW YORK State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 I35 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) , _ ' 27.300 14.900 21,700 31 100 33.500 28.500 19.600 14.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 16,680 2.100 0.140 0.100 0,100 0.100 0.460 12,360 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 48 40-47-19.4 N 073-43-38.5 W 30.0 28.0 Address: 12 Bond St City:Great Neck Plaza County:NASSAU State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 53,000 27.100 -0.900 28.900 34.100 37.800 49.900 44.900 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0:330 1',100 0.800 0,120 0.100 0.100 0,100 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 ,, 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) 53,000 27.100 -000 28.900 34,100 37.800 49.900 44,900 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0,100 0.100 0.100 0.240 0.470 0,200 0.100 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 9W 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 53,000 27.100 -0.900 28.900 34.100 37.800 49.900 44.900 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0,420 0.110 0,100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0,350 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure 11gt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 49 40-59-55.3N 073-50-08.5 W 121,1 39,3 Address: Ardsley Rd City: Ardlsey County:WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) 53900 47 700 103.000 122.600 112.700 89.300 120.900 115 100 Transmitting ERA(watts) 0.100 2.510 6.770 6.250 1.900 0.140 0,100 0.100 Antenna, 2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 53,900 47,700 103,000 122.600 112.700 89.300 120.900 115,100 i Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0.100 1.320 13,560 11.810 3.730 0.410 RECEIVED ITEC 2016 C2NI1�G BOARD or APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 17 of 22 august 2007 log Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206:-"," File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude'- Longitude Ground Elevation Structure 1lgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 49 40-59-55.3 N` 073-50-08.5 W 121,1 39.3 Address: Ardsley Rd City: Ardisey County;WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from truenorth), 0, 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) '53.900 47.700 103.000 122.600 112.700 89.300 120.900 115.100 Transmitting ERP(watts) 13.560 8.170 0.980 0.100 0,100 0.100 0.210 6.950 Location Latitude Lgngitude. .. Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 50 41-06-35.0 N 074-23-0$:9 W 249.9 51.5 1210797 Address:Dockerty Hollow Road City: West Milford County:PASSAIC.'` State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna- 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 d5 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -14.500 56.200 87.000 141.200 31.000 49.700 -34.900 -14.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.710 35.480 144.540 97.720 2.750 0.470 0.320 0.320 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -14:500 56,200 87.000 141.200 31.000 49 700 -34900 -14.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.460 0.320 0.320 2.950 48.980 158.490 40.740 1.620 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90' 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -14.500 56.200 87.000 141,200 31.000 49.700 -34.900 -14.000 Transmitting ERP(watts) 128.820 15.490 1.550.:',, 0.320 0.320 0.600 6.760 93.330 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) :-(meters) Registration No. 51 40-42-24.4 N 074-34-38.6 W 123.4 35.7 Address: Liberty Ave City: Bernardsville County: SOMERSET State:NJ Construction Deadliner, Antenna: I Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -59 100 57 100 82 200 69.100 66.500 90.400 38.500 -44.200 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.200 14.190 41.890 30.340 4.810 0.430 0.100 0.210 Antenna: 2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AAT(meters) -59.100 57.100 82.200 69.100 66,500 90.400 38.500 -44.200 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.520 0.130 0.410 4.090 20.780 42.860 23.320 4.700 RECEIVED DEC 20�G 70IMNG BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 18 of 22 August 2007 } t Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMIT-ED PARTNERSI-11P Call Sign: KNKA206 ' File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude - Longitude Ground Elevation Structure ligt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 51 40-42-24.4 N 074-34-38.6 W 123.4 35.7 Address: Liberty.Ave City:Bernardsville County:SOMERSET State: NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0. 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna height AA"r(meters) r 59.100 57.100 82.200 69.100 66.500 90.400 38.500 -44.200 Transmitting ERP(watts) -" 0.000 13 870 2 100 0.160 0.110 1.130 8.360 32.510 Location Latitude Longitude:„ Ground Elevation Structure Eigt to Tip Antenna Structure " (meters) (meters) Registration No, 52 40-46-27.4 N 074-17-51.5 W',, 157.4 53.0 Address: Chetwynd Terrace City: Livingston County:ESSEX State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 1 Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 121.100 72:600 147.000 150.700 146.100 100.000 110.400 115.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.800 21.440 36.480 19.230 0.130 0.130 0.130 0.130 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90..E 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 121.100 72.600 147.000 150.700 146.100 100.000 110.400 115.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.180 0 180 0,460 4 170 26.170 23.330 3.690 0.560 Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90."-": ~ 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 121.100 72.600 147.000 150.700 146.100 100.000 110.400 115.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 5.070 0.100 0.100 ,, 0.100 0.100 0.510 7.670 9.290 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevaiion Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 53 40-54-20.2 N 074-15-41.9 W 56.1 32.6 1251166 Address: 45 Demarest Drive City: Wayne County: PASSAIC State:N1 Construction Deadline: Antenna, I Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna lleight AAT(meters) -29.400 -22.400 47 200 29.900 -61.700 29.700 -20 800 -66.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 18.800 22.090 0.140 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.190 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) -29.400 -22.400 47.200 29.900 -61.700 29,700 -20.800 -66.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 1.040 30.600 3.450 0.150 0.100 0.100 RECEIVED DEC 2 2010 Z �4 NC BQARD OP APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 19 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign:KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date:09-03-2014 Location Latitude- Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 53 40-54-20.2 N '` 074-15-41.9 W 56.1 32,6 1251166 Address: 45 Demarest Drive City: Wayne County:PASSAIC State:NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from tt•tie north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 29A00 -22.400 47.200 29.900 -61.700 29.700 -20.800 -66.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 49,210 4.810 0,250 0,120 0.120 0.130 4.700 44.880 Location Latitude Longitude' Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 54 40-53-10.4 N 073-59-00.5 W� 2.0 30.5 Address: Palisade Ave City: Englewood County:BERGEN' State: NJ Construction Deadline: Antenna: I Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 5.200 -30.900 4.800 13,400 -5.400 28.300 11.400 9.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 2.410 20.990 38.200 14.900 1.260 0.100 0.100 0.100 Antenna: 2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90' 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 5.200 -30.900 4.800 13.400 -5,400 28.300 11.400 9.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.120 0.140 0.430 4.510 11.340 6.750 1.290 0.260 Antenna:3 Azimuth (from true north) 0 45 90 .135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 5200 -30.900 4.800 13.400 -5.400 28.300 11.400 9.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 9.820 0.580 0.100..-. 0.100 0.180 4.490 27.040 34.840 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation• Structure ligt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) ''"(meters) Registration No. 55 40-36-31.4 N 074-07-20.5 W 65.6 31.7 Address: 27 Fanning St City: Staten Island County:RICHMOND State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: I Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 88,900 80.600 82.400 90.900 87.400 74:200 87.000 81.700 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.150 4.590 15 560 4.000 0,120 0.100 0,100 0.100 Antenna, 2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 55.300 77.000 78 800 87.300 83.800 70.600 83.400 78.100 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0 100 0.240 0.330 0.270 RECEIVED ITEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Page 20 of 22 August 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Call Sign; KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date;09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure flgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 55 40-36.31A 14 074-07-20.5 W 65 6 31.7 Address:27 Fanning St City: Staten Islarid County:RICHMOND State:NY Construction Deadline: Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from'true north) 0 45 90 135 I80 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 88.000 79.706 81,500 90.000 86.500 73.300 86.100 80.800 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0 330 0.270 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0,240 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Ilgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 56 40-40-05.5 N 073-48-29.4 W 9.1 10.9 Address: 133 -40 131 st Street City: South Ozone Park County:QUEENS State:NY Construction Deadline:08-0.5-2010 Antenna: l Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 2.300 -7.900 12.900 17.600 17.900 18.500 0.500 -0.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.630 17.040 282'320 98.030 0.630 0.630 0.630 0.630 Antenna:2 Azimuth(Froin true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 2.300 -7900 12.900 17.600 17.900 18.500 0.500 -0.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.630 0.630 0.630 4.590 214.470 174.330 1.870 0.630 Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90- 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 2.300 -7.900 12.900 17.600 17.900 18,500 0.500 -0.400 Transmitting ERP(watts) 98.030 0.630 0.630 0.630 0.630 0.630 17.040 282.720 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) •(meters) Registration No. 57 40-47-32.3 N 074-40-15.3 W 256.5 50.3 Address: 120 North'Road City: Chester County: MORRIS State: NJ Construction Deadline:08-05.2010 Antenna: 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 29 600 45 200 146.500 156.700 212,100 96.100 58.200 28.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.390 5.340 84.620 131.060 19.390 1.690 0.310 0.310 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 29.600 45.200 146.500 156.700 212 100 96.100 58.200 28.300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 0.990 0200 0.200 2.350 23.010 45.940 42 290 13.210 RECEIVED DEC S 2010 -ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-C Niue 21 of 22 •1n>ust 2007 Licensee Name: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Cali Sign: KNKA206 File Number: 0006358273 Print Date: 09-03-2014 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 57 40-47-32.3 N'' 074-40-15.3 W 256.5 50.3 Address: 120 No 'Road.. . City: Chester County:MORRIS State: NJ Construction Deadline:08-05-2010 Antenna: 3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) _,t�.600 45.200 146.500 156.700 212.100 96.100 58.200 28,300 Transmitting ERP(watts) 82.700 77.180 17.680 1.650 0.200 0200 2.080 20 770 Location Latitude Longitude, Ground Elevation Structure Hgt to Tip Antenna Structure (meters) (meters) Registration No. 58 41.13.43,1 N 073-54-06.8 W, 100.6 45.7 Address:21.51 Scenic Drive City:Cortlandt County:WESTCHESTER State:NY Construction Deadline:08-05-2010 Antenna: 1 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28.100 -9,400 39.000 19 500 135 000 68.600 3,800 18.900 Transmitting ERP(watts) 4.880 165,410 387.750 [47,420 0.770 1.470 0,770 0.770 Antenna:2 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 , 90 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28.100 -9.400 39.060 19,500 135,000 68.600 3.800 18.900 Transmitting,ERP(watts) 1.350 0.770 0.770 1.270 51.000 202,080 157.170 8.090 Antenna:3 Azimuth(from true north) 0 45 90.,•, 135 180 225 270 315 Antenna Height AAT(meters) 28,100 -9.400 39.000 19.500 135.000 68,600 3.800 18.900 Transmitting ERP(watts) 387.750 147.420 0.770, 1,470 0.770 0.770 4.880 165.410 Control Points: Control Pt.No.2 Address: 500 W.Dove Rd. City:Southlake County: TARRANT State: TX Telephone Number:(800)264-6620 Waivers/Conditions: License renewal granted on a conditional basis,subject to the outcome of FCC proceeding WT Docket No. 10-112(see FCC 10-86, paras. 113 and 126). ?,FCcgVED SEC � Fza�� ZONING I3S36'aRD or APPEALr FCC 601-C Page 22 ot•22 %ugust 2007 REFERENCE('01'1' This is not an official FCC license.It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting,or display of an FCC license,this document may not be used in place ofan official FCC license Ga U�"y YX'y4.r�. , Federal Communlcatio)Ils Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sg'.°"-'S RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign File Number ATl'N: REGULATORY WQGA906 0006150139 CELLCO PARTNERSHiP Radio Service 1 120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG AW-AWS, 1710-1755/2110-2155 MHz ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 bands FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Ca rant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-29-2006 12-2&-2013 11-29-2021 02-14-2014 Market NumberChannel block Sub-Market Designator BEA010 B 15 (Market Name New York-No.New,ter.-Long Isl 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date T__3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is conditioned upon the licensee,prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station,making reasonable efforts to coordinate frequency usage with known co-channel and adjacent channel incumbent federal users operating in the 1710-1755 MHz band whose facilities could be affected by the proposed operations.See,e.g.,FCC and N&ED Coordination Proceduics in the 1710-1755 MHz Band, Public Notice,FCC 06-50, WTB Docket No.02-353,rel.Apri 2006. DEC 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Conditions: Pursuant to y§'309(h)of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,47 U.S C.§309(h),this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of'the t'requencies designated in tine license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended See 47 U S C §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Corti mtin ications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606 This license may riot authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. TO view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). TO view the license record,go to the ULS homepage at htip:tr'wireless.fce.gov/uls/index htnn?Joh=home and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search I'or license information. FCC 601-Nl B Page; I of i April 2009 REFERENCE COPY C„, This is not an official FCC license.It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting,or display of an FCC license,this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license. QO Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign Fiie Number ATTN:REGULATORY WQGB263 0006150456 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG Radio Service ALPHARETTA,GA30009-7630 AW-AWS,1710-1755/2110-2155 MHz bands FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date t1-29-2006 01-04-2014 11-29-2021 02-14-2014 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator CMAOOI A 0 Market Name New York,NY-NJ/Nassau-Suffolk st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Bate Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is conditioned upon the licensee,prior to initiating operations from any base or fixed station,snaking reasonable efforts to coordinate frequency usage with known co-channel and adjacent channel incumbent federal users operating in the 1710-1755 MHz band whose facilities could be affected by the proposed operations.See,e:g.,FCC and NTIA Coordination Procedures in the 1710-1755 MHz Band,Public Notice,FCC 06-50,WTB Docket No.02-353,rel.April 20, 2006 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF'APPEAI.S Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h)of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended,47 U.S.C.§309(h),this license is subject to the following conditions. This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.0 §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by§706of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record,go to the LILS homepage at http.//wireless.fec.gov/uls/index.htm?job=hoine and select"License Search" Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB Page I of 2 April 2009 i t ( ' I Licensee Name. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign: WQGB263 File Number: 0006150456 Print Date: 02-14-2014 The license is subject to compliance with the provisions of the January 12,2001 Agreement between Deutsche Tefekom AG, VoiceStream Wireless Corporation,VoiceStream Wireless Holding Corporation and the Department of Justice(DOJ)and the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI),which addresses national security,law enforcement,and public safety issues of the FBI and the DOJ regarding the authority granted by this license.Nothing in the Agreement is intended to limit any obligation imposed by Federal lawor regulation including,but not limited to,47 U.S.C. Section 222(x)and(c)(1)and the FCC's implementing regulations. The Agreement is published at VoiceStream-DT Order,IB Docket No.00-187,FCC 01-142,16 FCC Red 9779,9853(2001). RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FCC 601-MB Page 2 of 2 April 2009 {a / I19 REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license.It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting,or display of an FCC license,this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license. Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign File Number ATTN:REGULATORY WQJQ689 0003865021 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Radio Service 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150 GASA5REG WU-700 MHz Upper Band(Block C) ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-26-2008 06-11-2009 06-13-2019 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator REA001 C 0 Market Name Northeast 1st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations,whether exclusively or in combination with other services,the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast service or within the tern of the license had the broadcast service not been provided,whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CFR§27,13(b). RECEIVED This authorization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h)of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended,47 U.S.C.§309(h),this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.0 § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by§706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C.§606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record,go to the ULS homepage at littp://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select"License Search", Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-i<IB Page I of 1 April 2009 i 1 REFERENCE COPY This is not an official FCC license.It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated.In cases where FCC rules require the presentation,posting,or display of an FCC license,this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license. �` Federal Communications Commission " Y Wireless Telecommunications Bureau RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELL.CO PARTNERSHIP Call Sign File Number ATTN:REGULATORY WQJQ696 0003864907 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Radio Service 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY,#150.GASA5REG WY-700 MHz Lower Band(Blocks A, ALPHARETTA,GA 30009-7630 B,E) FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 1L-26-2008 06-11-2009 06-13-2019 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BEA010 A 0 Market Name New York-No.New Jer.-Long Isl I st Build-out Date 2nd Build-out Date 3rd Build-out Date 4th Build-out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations,whether exclusively or in combination with other services,the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast service or within the term of the license had the broadcast service not been provided,whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CPR§27.13(b). RECEIVED DEC 2 ')016 ZONING 130ARD OF APPEALS Conditions: Pursuant to§309(h)of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended,47 U.S.C.§309(h),this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by§706 of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended. See 47 U.S.C.§606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license,refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the LJaiversal Licensing System(ULS). To view the license record,go to the ULS homepage at itttp•//wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm'?Job=home and select"License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information FCC 601-,MB Page 1 of 1 April 2009 I i I EXHIBIT "C" RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 -70NING BOARD OF APPEALS i l A UTHORIZATIONAND CONSENT WHEREAS, New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless"),with a mailing address of c/o Amato Law Group,PLLC,666 Old Country Road,Suite 901,Garden City,New York 11530,desires to install a public utility wireless communication facility (the"Communication Facility")on certain real property located at 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York,known and designated as Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000,Section 15,Block 9,Lot 8.1 (the"Property"),owned by M.G.H.Enterprises,Inc.(the"Owner"),with a mailing address of 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York 11957. WHEREAS,Verizon Wireless,in order to install and operate the Communication Facility at the Property,must submit to the Town of Southold(the"Town")certain zoning applications and/or building permit applications(collectively the"Applications"). WHEREAS,the Owner agrees and consents to Verizon Wireless'submission of all necessary Applications to the Town, as well as any other application required by any federal,state or local entity with jurisdiction thereof,such that the required approvals for the proposed Communication Facility are necessary. NOW,THEREFORE,the Owner hereby authorizes,consents and agrees to have Verizon Wireless act as its agent,as follows: 1. The Owner hereby consents to the filing of all Applications by Verizon Wireless with the Town,and any other necessary federal,state or local agency,with respect to the installation and operation of the Communication Facility on the Property. 2. Verizon Wireless shall have the authority to act as the limited Agent for the Owner, thereby permitting Verizon Wireless to execute and complete any necessary documents on behalf of said Owner as may be required in order to obtain the necessary approvals and permits to install and operate the Communication Facility. 3. This Authorization shall be limited solely for the purpose of permitting Verizon Wireless to obtain the necessary approvals and permits to install and operate the Communication Facility,and for no other purpose. 4. This Authorization shall terminate,and be of no further force and effect,only after Verizon Wireless receives the necessary Town,federal,state and/or local approvals and permits required to install and operate the Communication Facility. M.G.H.ENTERPRISES,INC. BY. Name.Robert Haase Title:President Sworn to before me this the t6 day of rt o 2016 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 Notary Public ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS WHAM FEEHAN WHY Pablo,state of New York No.01FE/9M1• Cowry Terni Expires Septi 8. 14_ EXHIBIT "D" 70' � RECEIVED DEC 2 2096 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS *rjf SO�Ty Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �0� Deo 53095 Main Road-P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio,Jr. Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Homing p �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider l�Co(jHj'(,� Soutltfxld-11RD11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net I -AEC 2096 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZONING 1Q�P -gPFEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD °�." �i r�;:�JI Tel.(631)765.1809-Fax(631)765-9064 �' J 2 2012 FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMI?QeION,:f AA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15,2012 'r'= - ZBA FILE: 6533 NAME OF APPLICANT: MGH Enterprises,Inc./New Cingular Wireless, LLC PROPERTY LOCATION:40200 Main Road(adj.to Gardiners Bay)Orient NY SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1 SARA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 12, 2012 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 30, 2012. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject property is a conforming lot in the MII zone. It is improved with a one story frame restaurant with attached deck, accessory one and two story building, along with boat slips. It has 181.72 feet of frontage on Main Road (SR 25), 752.00 feet along the eastern property line, 348.41 feet on Gardiners Bay and 1000.01 along the western property line as shown on the survey dated 4-6-2006 last updated 10- 27-2011 prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger,PLLC. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XVII Code Section 280-70i(3) and Article XIII Section 280-56 (Bulk Schedule), based on an application for building permit to install a wireless telecommunication tower and equipment and the Building Inspector's October 17, 2011, amended November 9, 2011 Notice of Disapproval at; 1) less than the code required distance to adjacent residential property line of 500 feet, 2) less than the code required side yard setback of 25 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to install a new wireless communication tower and equipment at 7.1 feet from a residential property line where the code requires minimum distance shall be no less than 500 feet and a side yard setback of 7.1 feet where the code requires 25 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Zoning Board requested comments from the Planning Board. In a memorandum dated December 20,2011,the Planning Board stated they just received the Site Plan and Special ��0 a RECEIVED Page 2 of 3—February 15,2012 DEC 2 2016 ZBA File#6533—MGH Enterprises,IncJNcw Cingular Wireless,LLC CTM: 1000-15-9-8 1 ZONING BOARD of APPEALS Exception applications and have not yet determined their completeness. The Planning Board requested a condition be added to the decision stating the proposed height and location are necessary and confirmed by the Planning Board as per Town Code, The applicant submitted, on Feb. 6, 2012, a letter from NYS Office of Parks,Recreation, and Historic Preservation indicating that the applicant's proposed project will have "no effect upon the cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Registers of Historic Places;"and a cover letter explaining that that State was duly notified by certified mail about the public hearing and had not replied and did not appear in opposition . FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 2,2012 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood,and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1, Town Law&267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, The surrounding area is of mixed uses containing a marina, a restaurant, an office building and parking lot used by Plum Island employees,a large interstate ferry terminal and a residential development. Any detriment is mitigated by the placement of the tower at the southernmost end of the property which is the farthest distance from the existing buildings and residences in the area. 2. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance because any proposal to construct a cellular tower to fill in the gap in coverage that is proposed by this request in this area of Southold Town would require similar or larger variances. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. The code required minimum distance of all wireless equipment adjacent to residential property lines is no less than 500 feet, the applicant is proposing a 7.1 foot setback, representing a greater than ninety eight percent (98%) relief from the code. Also the requirement of a 25 foot minimum side yard setback is proposed to be reduced to 7.1 feet; this represents a seventy percent(70%)relief from the code. However,the residential property in question is owned by Long Island State Park Commission(Orient State Park)and has no residential structures located within the required fall zone and is the access roadway to the park with no access to the beach within the area of the monopole site, 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. With respect to the physical impact on the neighborhood,the Board finds,based on the report submitted by the applicant titled "Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility Orient By the Sea" Prepared by VHB Engineering surveying and Landscape Architecture,PC, that the location is the least obtrusive,given the uses in the surrounding area and the limited choice of locations for siting such a structure. As for the environmental conditions with respect to the radio frequency emissions, the total amount emitted will be more than 48 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure as set by the FCC and stated on page 12 (Compliance Conclusion) of the report titled "Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance assessment and Report submitted by the applicant's expert consultant 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant choose the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to choosing this location. However, the difficulty is actually caused by the lack of any parcel within the proposed effective range of the proposed tower that would not need even more extreme variances. f/ Page 3 of 3—February 15,2012 ZBA File#6533—MGH Enterprises,Inc./New Cingular Wireless,LLC CTM 1000-15-9-8.1 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new wireless telecommunication tower and equipment while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Schneider, and duly carried, to GRANT,the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan prepared by William F. Collins, AIA,Architects, LLC and dated 4/27/06 last revised 10/28/11 and the survey dated 4-6-2006 last updated 10-27-2011 prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger, PLLC. Subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The height and location variances granted in this decision is subject to the Applicants receiving site plan and Special Exception approvals and confirmation of the necessity of the proposed location and height, as per Town code,from the Southold Town Planning Board. 2. Although the drawings approved in this decision refer to a monopole designed to telescope to 90 feet in height,this decision is not a de facto height variance.The MII zone permits a maximum of 80 feet for cell towers; and should the applicant deem it necessary in future to increase the height of the monopole beyond what the code permits,they must return to the ZBA for a height variance, That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity Vote of the Board- Ayes:Members Weisman(Chairperson),Schneider,Dinizio,Horning, Member Goehringer was absent. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0) RECEJVEFv - 0�-. - 5/ 0—� Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson DEC 2 2016 Approved for filing � /%� /2012 Z® KING goARD OF gPPFALS AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR -"--- SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 TEL:(516)227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 December 5, 2016,,1, BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold of AppEA� Town Hall Annex Building BOARD 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility(the"Communication Facility")to be collocated at 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York,known and designated as District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property") NYSMSA Site Reference: Orient Point 2/Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with Verizon Wireless'Application for the proposed Communication Facility to be collocated at the Property, which was filed with the ZBA on December 2, 2016, enclosed please find ten (10) copies of a letter from the Suffolk County Police Department (the "SCPD"), expressing the urgent need for the Communication Facility and the SCPD's support for the Application. Please incorporate the same into each Application packet. Further, as requested, enclosed please find one (1) additional copy of the Application. In light of the foregoing,we respectfully request that the Application be reviewed by the ZBA on an expedited basis, and be scheduled for the next available public hearing. If you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this Application. Fessica yours, • - n Enclosures AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR ----------- SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 TEL:(516)227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 December 2, 2016 RECEIVED BY HAND DELIVERY Zoning Board of Appeals DEC 0 2 2016 Town of Southold ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold (the "Town") Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility(the"Communication Facility")to be collocated at 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York,known and designated as District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property") NYSMSA Site Reference: Orient Point 2/Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with Verizon Wireless'Application for the proposed Communication Facility to be collocated at the Property, enclosed are nine (9) sets of the following materials: 1. Notice of Disapproval issued by the Town, dated May 23, 2016, and renewed and amended on October 18, 2016; 2. Area Variance Application, executed by Verizon Wireless; 3. Applicant's Project Description; 4. Questionnaire,executed by Verizon Wireless,with a copy of the Permit issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation attached thereto; 5. Agricultural Data Statement, executed by Verizon Wireless; 6. Authorization form, executed by the Property owner; 7. Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form, executed by the Property owner; 8. Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form, executed by Verizon Wireless; 9. Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, executed by Amato Law Group, PLLC; 10. Petition in Support of the Application; 11. Photographs of the Property, including the existing AT&T facility; 12. Copies of prior ZBA Decisions issued for the Property; AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC RECEIVED 13. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy for the Property; D E C 2 2016 14. Copies of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions recorded on the Property; 15. Town Property Card; ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 16. Full Environmental Assessment Form,prepared by VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C.,dated May 17, 2016; 17. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form,prepared by VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C., dated May 17, 2016; 18. Property survey,prepared by Hawkins Webb Jaeger PLLC; 19. Zoning Drawings,prepared, signed and sealed by WFC Architects,LLP, issued for ,R filing on May 23, 2016; and 20. Application filing fee, in the amount of$ We have been advised by both the Suffolk County Police Department and the Cross Sound Ferry that there is a serious lack of Verizon Wireless coverage in the Orient area and they are in dire need of the Communication Facility at the Property. As such,we respectfully request that Verizon Wireless' Application be processed on an expedited basis, if possible. If you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this Application. Very truly yours, temise J. Vista Enclosures cc: Verizon Wireless (via email, without enclosures) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law CL Permittee and Facility Information Permit Issued To: Facility: NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ORIENT BY THE SEA MARINA dba Verison Wireless 40200 MAIN RDISCTM# 1000-15-09-08 4 CENTERROCK RD ORIENT,NY 11957 West Nyack,NY 10994 0� (914) 714-7371 RECEIVED Facility Application Contact: DEC 2010 VHB ENGINEERING SURVEYING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PC ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 100 MOTOR PKWY STE 135 HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788 (631)787-3400 Facility Location: in SOUTHOLD in SUFFOLK COUNTY Village: Orient Facility Principal Reference Point: NYTM-E: 731.2 NYTM-N: 4559.5 Latitude: 41'09'14.0" Longitude: 72'14'40.8" Project Location: 40200 Main Road - Watercourse- Gardiners Bay Authorized Activity: Construct addition to existing wireless communication compound. All authorized activities must be in strict conformance with the attached plans stamped NYSDEC approved on 8/25/16. (JRP) NOTE: It has been determined that this parcel is more than 100 feet from DEC regulated freshwater wetlands and therefore is out of Freshwater Wetlands Act(Article 24)jurisdiction. Page 1 of 6 i NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION i Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 -7 �7 3 v'� 1 RECEIVED ! I Permit Authorizations DEC 2 2016 i ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Tidal Wetlands -Under Article 25 Permit ID 1-4738-00898/00022 New Permit Effective Date: 8/25/2016 Expiration Date: 8/25/2021 NYSDEC Approval By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, and all conditions included as part of this permit. Permit Administrator:MARK CARRARA,Deputy Regional Permit Administrator Address: NYSDEC Region 1 Headquarters SUNY @ Stony Brook150 Circle Rd Stony Brook,NY 11790 -3409 Authorized Signature: Date 'r' /36 /-.e Distribution List VHB ENGINEERING SURVEYING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PC Habitat-TW JACQUELINE R PASQUINI Permit Components NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS, APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS - Apply to the Following Permits: TIDAL WETLANDS 1. Post Permit Sign The permit sign enclosed with this permit shall be posted in a conspicuous location on the worksite and adequately protected from the weather. 2. Notice of Commencement At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they Page 2 of 6 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION RECEIVED Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 DEC Z016 are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 dgOc�fgc r i tion of project,the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned,O&MwOitt photographs of j the completed work. 3. Concrete Leachate During construction,no wet or fresh concrete or leachate shall be allowed to escape into any wetlands or waters of New York State,nor shall washings from ready-mixed concrete trucks, mixers, or other devices be allowed to enter any wetland or waters. Only watertight or waterproof forms shall be used. Wet concrete shall not be poured to displace water within the forms. 4. No Construction Debris in Wetland or Adjacent Area Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area(upland)and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in wetlands and/or protected buffer areas. s. No Disturbance to Vegetated Tidal Wetlands There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetlands or protected buffer areas as a result of the permitted activities. 6. Storage of Equipment,Materials The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to the upland area landward of the bulkhead or on a barge. 7. Seeding Disturbed Areas All areas of soil disturbance resulting from the approved project shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetation(grasses, etc.)immediately following project completion of prior to permit expiration,whichever comes first. If the project site remains inactive for more than 48 hours or planting is impractical due to the season,then the area shall be stabilized with straw or hay mulch or jute matting until weather conditions favor germination. 8. Clean Fill Only All fill shall consist of clean sand, gravel, or soil(not asphalt, slag, flyash,broken concrete or demolition debris). 9. Direct Runoff Away from Tidal Wetland and Buffer Roads, driveways, and parking areas shall be graded to direct runoff away from tidal wetlands and protected buffer areas. 10. Straw Bales or Other at Tidal Wetland A row of staked straw bales or approvable erosion control devices shall be placed at the landward edge of the buffer area as per the NYSDEC-approved plan,prior to commencement of any regulated activities and remain in place and in good, functional condition until the project is completed and all disturbed areas are stabilized with vegetation. 11. Contain Exposed,Stockpiled Soils All disturbed areas where soil will be temporarily exposed or stockpiled for longer than 48 hours shall be contained by a continuous line of staked haybales/silt curtains (or other NYSDEC approved devices)placed on the seaward side between the fill and the wetland or protected buffer area. Tarps are authorized to supplement these approved methods. 12. State May Order Removal or Alteration of Work If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State,or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall,without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Page 3 of 6 I i NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION` / Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 � �EC 2 Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncom leted��tr i t 11 and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the wa rcouu see.AT�o c�alim�ss a be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 13. State May Require Site Restoration If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the project hereby authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may lawfully require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York-on account of any such removal or alteration. 14. Precautions Against Contamination of Waters All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings,paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. 15. Conformance With Plans All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or applicant's agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by WFC Architects last revised 4/22/16 . 16. State Not Liable for Damage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. GENERAL CONDITIONS - Apply to ALL Authorized Permits: 1. Facility Inspection by The Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation(the Department)to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71- 0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit,including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions,must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. 2. Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. 3. Applications For Permit Renewals,Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a Page 4 of 6 J 1AM NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 i separate written application to the Department for permit renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal,modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. Submission of applications for permit renewal,modification or transfer are to be submitted to: RECEIVED 01 Regional-Permit Administrator DEC 2 2010 NYSDEC Region 1 Headquarters SUNY @ Stony BrookJ50 Circle Rd ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Stony Brook,NY11790-3409 4. Submission of Renewal Application The permittee must submit a renewal application at least 30 days before permit expiration for the following permit authorizations: Tidal Wetlands. 5. Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to exercise all available authority to modify, suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a. materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b. failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c. exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e. noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner,any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. 6. Permit Transfer Permits are transferrable unless specifically prohibited by statute,regulation or another permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actual transfer of ownership. NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee,excepting state or federal agencies, expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless'the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents ("DEC")for all claims, suits, actions, and damages,to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with, or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and arising under Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision Page 5 of 6 A NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMkNI'OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Facility DEC ID 1-4738-00898 under federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities,and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals,lands,easements and rights-of- way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a parry to the permit. RECEIVED DEC °ZOIu ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 6 of 6 4 RECEIVED .DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY veriz®nv ORIENT POINT 40200 MAIN ROAD,ORIENT,, NY 11957 � WFC PROJECT NO. 14-10823 A R C H I T E C T S SITE INFORMATION PROJECT CONTACTS DRAWING INDEX - RED T,gOm� a—�a — —----- NYSDEC ----- -- -- APPROVED AS PER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT o�S8`aena DATE LOCATION MAP KEY MAP NOTES veriz®nl 'ORENT PONT 7 T-100.00 � oc 3 RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 gON106 BOARD OF APPEALS 2.wN ary y� P1etlM wu°c[ ra wo w unw ai n �A[ t9 � , WUN u i `"`h `\ •' \ � s...e.us °a Iv ssu°.c,o Kwnx wran w,K a.� A 0. C H 1 T E C T 5 i�angss�s,cmil [LEYA➢Otl a um[ c m.r.nm arcva '.1 _ r\ wu a n.w.w,avec M°wru e �151LT�FENCE�DETAILHAY BALED AIL �•� "o.a"na.,si:rt%[�'a'"°"' .°`°`ate°a �'a:.':.:rM` ...°,a�.e..,.r, /� p.°i ,9C \ .,,M.w<..a oar.w �"'C, f �4 —.EE hnM1wO(er �PEe«e DEC W=- AS PER TERF/ . [�W ND CONDITIONS OF/d It QERRMIT O.f- l p 9Naa�,° gnaw adb ATEFACILITY mt. uz. L7 � r /% � n� �w. .�m'srz tea°n rr wvassu verizon� 'ORENT PONT ZONNG TABLE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN =i e=�.. TREE PLANTING DETAIL wt— ° ® �S P'1 OO.00 I .-r RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NYSDEC AP ED AD PE9 M1 x �hna.>,m Mr.me air�JD C4ND1710PJ5 DF Y "' _ ,..a4.lnes t•Antenna .oe.�.aa"°... j�ERMIT 0 4-Dlpl�ezer 2.Ouarplaxer �} TE S / .y'., �/ �♦a/.o ouw _ , Ela XaalX11 . T E C XX s T 5 t�tM X _ - ,,,,, ,W �O �4��/FCt �eMa rmw.n�w ' T F -------------- - JO OF N6�� -I O m mr on�nr.l muLn wtuwmr woa�w»I �� f.� +.POLAR 82201-3CA1 POLAR 82201-3CA1 , /POWER,. POWER w W orerei oc Generaier 3 RR .� �cnm ai en7osure ' /--�I rnn.u.rv.n.aw.aa..r..rm...e:m.-.y=•r l�aw...r­n�w n�v e� rn(symL]u rn n°u.I verizon,/ ,...V...ea�•.ea .._ e.. d.n�y �.,w.J e.r.. w.e.°� 'ORENT PONT? .m. Buttss gBlf Nf LGfi! - ;_ rl MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAILS ..Y.. - - �ivae.0 ao[aasen oenas WN .vo wne't�1w.er+a wcsu� /1 GENERATOR INFO - DPLEXER DETAILS A-101.00 � e J RECEIVED DEC 2 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FJA8 A R C H I T E C T-S .......... OF N C A ..OVED NYSDEAfft'TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT NO/ DATE PAM E) verizon 'OQM POW 2' -102.00 ,1N13 SPECIRCATION M ,. i y I-3 / i !ONING BOARD OF.APPEALS c r� of }, r r I � m, 4 k +' •�lrs� 1µ ! f —; `•s. . rn:,,.r v�,r c.;..�ry w.l Y „ "' • di�: t �1 Long aVd 01 pori ow . '1 +. I } r � jar,• int num +4`, Gaidiners Say L .l ,q Island } V . I J { I iD3@o0�il� oGQ�� J�'i-IQ `ooze J.-Oft "emn)a2of.0 V 6 e t 11 111 111 • 371 ng �R MR RECEIVEL -:. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 4 � .v 1, oa IiiIIlllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIII�III! iflll!II!!Illi!!II IIli�iiiilllllil�i Illilliilllf0111 Illlilllilliilllil i �\aPOit` 'ems 6*q( � � •G��/'��jj��V� l 0� ��.;� ��� 11f7i� J� `t 513 ` fix, .t ray' 'V@i*��'A I�d� ��'�� 'i���g'rj'i/y t•�� IP '�f 5,N+ �, "v � t .� a'4� S- # #. 41 �A4�, ''TTTTII - ✓ Q s � r ; '� `r r� y . �, �.. s� ,� ;� � . ,��;� _:r_ �_ . _ __r �. -�,.,� � �_,� �._ . � .�.� ��,�. o ,�r. .. _�� �.�,� u� �- ,. 3' .� xx; __ - � v> _ 13x� f 1� l L l� {t,'R � '� i � --'�.. �e �. _ .'. �. . o ., t' « .., ,f ..: �_ „ f .'F .�., �. - '. I� * _. � � �� _ r 3 1 ,; "�" _. � � - a. , �* .�s �' JkAMe�--�'._ .. - _ _ ,�„ .E-- s ��a+t:i s �-- ,.n :. ,.. ��-�, � �- :�.. r._ _ _ - .. - y ,a y . . z r r _� V' '.. - '� 6 x ,. .. _ a �� w r- ., - ;. ., � .� .. ,. y� q � ..� - ,,. �, _ bF � f � � _ - - �...: _. r .e_ .... .,�.pss _. �� _. ,r .-.-r,."x .. .. � ,� _. _ .. �z -�._._. G ,N - s_ �t .._ a _ � .. �. _ _ �_ . � . _ __ *Y.• t /, •. ,', ti RESTAURANT-8 - r. t J a wON 1 H RM ------------- 771, 77W ° i a ,t JAIPW , ; 170 Mi Ar Ll , - -- ___ "per,.• -.. `j 1 � • M- 0 - - - rte__-7.. ,W \ /; i► 1+ 4 I=H IU 13 AQQ OM C3 OO C "M C3 Q� rum= Proposed New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Communications Facility 40200 Main Road Hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Environmental Assessment Form—Part 1 Attachment Page 1, Item A—Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action involves the installation of a Verizon Wireless communications facility at 40200 Main Road in the hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold,Suffolk County, New York(the"subject property").Specifically,Verizon Wireless proposes to install a 20±-foot extension on the existing 69±- foot above grade level (agl)concealment pole at the subject property.Three antennas would be concealed within the resulting 89±-foot agl concealment pole,and associated equipment would be installed within a proposed equipment compound,north of the concealment pole and an adjacent equipment compound of another service provider.The equipment compound would measure 32-feet- by-13-feet-10±-inches(443±-square-feet),and would include a pier-supported steel platform (292.5± square feet)with equipment cabinets, main distribution boxes,remote radio heads and a 10 kW diesel- powered emergency backup generator thereon.A weather canopy would cover portions of the equipment platform.and would have four GPS units mounted thereon.The equipment compound would be surrounded by a 13-foot agl chain link fence,as well as nine 14-foot agl evergreen plantings for additional visual screening on the north and west sides.Associated utility conduits would be routed j underground at the subject property to existing connections. I I Page 9. Item E.1.a—Existing land uses: The subject property contains a commercial marina and restaurant,with an existing wireless communications facility(concealment pole and associated equipment).The surrounding land uses are generally described as follows: North: Single-family residential I East: Federal institutional,ferry terminal,County Park RECEIVED i South: Gardiner's Bay DEC 2 2016 West: State Park,single-family residential ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 11,Item E.2.h—Surface water features: i I The commercial marina within the subject property is shown on the NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Maps as a j category SM (coastal shoals,bars and mudflats)tidal wetland.The marina is also classified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory as M1UBLx(marine,subtidal, unconsolidated I bottom, excavated).Additionally,the proposed wireless communications facility is located approximately 113-feet-6±inches east of NYSDEC Freshwater wetland PL-3,associated with Orient Beach State Park.The proposed action would occur within the wetland adjacent areas and would not disturb these wetlands.The applicant will secure a Tidal Wetlands Permit,as well as a determination of non jurisdiction for freshwater wetlands, prior to installation of the proposed facility. \\vhb\pro1\Long1s1and\29675.18 Orient Point 2\ProjRecords\FIna]Docs\LEAF Attachment Amato edits_05132016.doa - - -- - - ------ --- ' - ,-_ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD 14� a OWNER SST' �jl' f)�� � VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT RECEIVED . Wl '�'�;1SE:"c 3l 6, f a�,-r r � i.. -ate2016 r ACR. _SLS FORMER OWNER E t�' 7' Lj Ba Ra of APS'- cd, �,,/ fi �� �+. � dLot�ING A S _ �W' � TYPE OF--BUILDING 't-V f•G-�•''/I7 old-/ `' G'i - C+ Y / Ln F•J S �d 4\ lJ G/ G. 'oti II T? _ / '�-�--_-✓ I RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. B. MISC. Mkt. Value 4? 6dAbIlObV LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 7� 4/ d4 ? a-a •► c; . rsi/7 L{j� ti}�i !� �� n �f_2 ? ,mod, ,200, �e r .� w e�=a — / 3 �// 2�f 11d t IM lr P� 7�� - r ,-rte a /(2/ Td t-��s�o/ �r �; � ��j �, ,•,�� -v� S` /3 �' .�- l :7� %Vi1�v`�+.'��s��� T�� L6-s, Q/��•�o, �o- �`"�����:.�` � �>� J 'tel q /� / �/JJ/J J ?17 / tom+ IJP j .f tS in � ��d �71/�.�/ L / !1 / 6. ��F GX l�� � Z. r.4Q�tf��d�lV\Dt ( •— tr� ,Z32" 0 h�'�h - y -r,4 e r f'tZ. - �-n a:v s 2J ® � 3� ! 6��-'� ti,l ,d Ih� 76 - / � Geo. ILDING COI�&TI N ��9J79 SoL � %zAGrO �JL`Jfi� 0P-M 17�8� &P-M yClST/tt!q7.1 FARN,� Acre .µ Vafue,Per Value J/ 7/�9 - �� CJI 77�G �Ga�r15¢l�t �1�� �i���� GX��i/!� CPrIa�;P,p �1 tJ�J n Tillable 1 h r td t,`T" d%ni, 7" CJr, �t- t L7 t �r�° 1� � •- t,7 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 6G,"r-6 t vp + t Woodland Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER 3 z-k _ ! r' FRONTAGE ON ROAD Brushlond DEPTH --- - � House P�c�: BULKHEAD ►ec ,/eQ - DOCK tLLLsr�y,� ,�` , e 105 Total 1)a Ltv «: f C� r fR - zf 77 ;i 15-9-8.1 11/01 -M: Bldg: , Foundation Bath Dinette Extension ,� , ti �, 3 2 � Basement /V/ Floors �r-�� y K. Extension" ;�'� 9 r Ext. Walls �+ � Interior Finish �° LR. Extension f�f1�,a`a 9� _ ^- , Fire Place y' - Heat �" DR. 'J f fr' �r► Y Type Roof ,r f,�, Rooms-1st Floor BR. .Por r, Y r` �j}"^"�/// ;2 ^ Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B. Porch` . t-1 \,a//' ch. �� %rr Dormer _ ,I Breezewa ', Driveway aIQ�S' ��. �.�ac± l ar•r.'� ' �:.n�' ��n N,Ci t�11 fl s/e°A or FY Patio O:'B. �o - . ,goo ) I zap' 125 C'2L1, Cn� Total "- _ - I - ; , , , """Y-d--, , _ �� .,��'?.o.LGL• )000 - 1 S- c--�• _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER _ _ STREET 14�()ZCo VILLAGE DIST SUB LOT roc /40,in Rd• Q-i-, a� C�rient A ACR. REMARKS TYPE OF BLD. po# 3101 B' Onsz1 5 yshc M .,, c.� ,c, ]LO 5•. PROP. CLASS S?Ca _ 1x-113 d 1°-t� v' ;,yv 3- al ,-e fe •r A� '3©mo - LAND IMP TOTAL DATE ii,4e f 1400 11 Soo 28,-700 1s/a co) �-� (. t7 �$©v 272oo( nz I-3 2ot ut � ONING - OF AP►' L-- BOARD 1 FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE FRONTAGE ON ROAD WOODLAND DEPTH MEADOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC �� Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK P.O.Box 1179 C Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER Telephone(631)765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER ®.Q www.southoldtownny.gov FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: December 8, 2016 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 7023 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 7023 for MGH Enterprises/Verizon Wireless- The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also enclosed is the Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire,Agricultural Data Statement, Full Environmental Assessment Form, Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form from Robert Haase of M.G.H. Enterprises, Inc., Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form from John Walden of NY SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Agent/Representative Transactional Disclosure Form, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form,Notice of Disapproval, Board of Zoning Appeals Application Authorization, Certificates of Occupancy, Findings Deliberations and Determination Meetings, Suffolk County Clerk Recording Page, Copy of Deed and Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, Copy of Petition, Cover Letters from Amato Law Group, PLLC,NYS DEC Permit, Copies of,Title Sheet for Verizon at Orient Point 2, Architectural Site Plan, Antenna and Equipment Details, and Light Specification, Photos, Copy of Site Plan, Environmental Assessment Form-Part:1, Site Location Map, Letter from the Suffolk County Police Department to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Property Record Card,Final Survey of Monopole and Equipment, and Drawings. ZBA TO TOWN CLERK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) ®ATE: 12/7/16 ZEA# NAME CHECK# AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP MGH RECEIVED 7023 EnterprisesMerizon 7187 $500.Op Wireless DEC _ g 2016 Southold Town Clerk r ,1�,�,�,%�, ,y--^rYfl" j ,,,� � � t� ' •. �y��' �i';e^ f��t.'`.�+W`t +�,f�a8 pi��'� l�S6h per_ v'^. - [ - ,�'� . 111-141, "`�'„ij,` ��4�,c� `a `°' ` '�I � ^"' � y��.ro t'+ .9 w 4���1�'u'`,;,P.' rx..y�. "���„f•.s,,,���r.�. .o g�`*ras�' .'• r�-� F YTO:THE'�` Town of Southold ',° >'`,<, r x: ©O'OCA Q- SAX' - �"'- -r't, „•da,%r•..rt• ;�,t.a..-c�<• .4ar4•... ..4:v., .:x,; ,+ '., .� ,x:.,1'�•a',t'�j x . DOLLARS'' e =� u �,- art,w�a .aurin•,-e=.sr..a..rrw ,�xea+'•;,s.urn.. q +a:. r,as• if -° C1,"w �'� � � aaawcww�u��sssd^^^'JJJ///���..{"'...uuu..; ��° y� i���;.w,'.�m -a.>...- �^f-."�.'•c�%"' d ux�'2%("��'r�'s_ i��.4`�'g��Y �Y - E P vE C 4. 7 �y ° Y C� i4Jhi C 'RMiif-J f A 1 I+�'"x{ UW. QX.' �,tK 74�'�xy17Y' '�` - ri„ ,� ..'�,�'�J• •,ems.,+,::S.;R�'tl,d^f++x r.'. �.a4.�yS NF•'•" „L� k, '����j� jt •t �-a> i{� •"ib�?/.'kij.bs,U^•!js^P ?�1u^'„4/',t's+'�a,��}�'W`.#i.f:nx+•�"!>n•+fi1•. r :f°•"�}}S5"k�i:1-��rsJr+.✓.1(u�.,•'�.��•',�t'O•n•_'ma�/VK»►i',r�-:•/`>>�r'�S'.q:J�L5C},�:..'J1' t4_arP��"r•'Ei �`,"'.i�,s.:r�y„y'k%�`�-r;�sf'�rjP :4"%mvPA�tia•'f���A��•+raP3��a-t`"..',.A-':'P+eJ,Jtv�^�"x'1,`+i'.-i�1w"^-ru;`.:s,'.-'•,`-"�•®:r^'F• ti'r+�'ELR{A`fy _ Piga• .�. 74 W?.rt'f��i a In REAL ESTATE CONSULTING REPORT New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Proposed Site Location: Extension of Existing AT&T Monopole 40200 Main Road Orient Point,New York 11957 DATE OF HEARING February 2, 2017 PREPARED FOR Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 PREPARED BY Mr. Michael Lynch LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 15 Dewey Street Huntington,New York 11743 (631) 427-1000 LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS 15 DEWEY STREET HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (631)427-1000 February 2, 2017 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Real Estate Consulting Report New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") Proposed Communications Facility: 40200 Main Road (S.R. 25) Orient Point,New York 11957 Dear Board Members: In accordance with a request from the applicant ("Applicant"), Verizon Wireless, I have inspected the above site and prepared a Real Estate Consulting Report (the "Report") regarding potential effects of a proposed wireless communications facility (the "Communications Facility") on the surrounding community. After considering the location, market conditions, proposed build, and all other factors that influence value, it is my professional opinion that the Applicant's proposed Communications Facility will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. My conclusions are outlined in the following Report. Respectfully submitted, LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. ,14x By: Michael J. Lynch N.Y.S.Cert.General R.E.Appraiser #46000001012 2 Purpose and Intended Use of Report The purpose and intended use of the Report is to study any possible adverse effects a proposed Communications Facility will have on the surrounding community. This Report is strictly prepared at the request of Verizon Wireless to present to the Town of Southold for a hearing to be held on February 2, 2017. Effective Date of Report The effective date of the Report is January 10, 2017, the date of inspection by Mr. Michael J. Lynch. Description of Proposed Communications Facility The Verizon Wireless proposed Communications Facility consists of, without limitation, the modification ("Modification"), colocation and extension by 20' of an existing 69' (AGL) stealth Monopole (the "Monopole") constructed by AT&T Wireless ("AT&T") that presently sits at the southwesterly corner of a restaurant/marina complex (the "Property"). In addition, Verizon Wireless will be internally mounting three (3) panel antennas within the extension of the Monopole. There will also be an associated equipment cabinetry compound ("the Compound") immediately adjacent (north) to an existing AT&T compound that is near the Monopole. The Compound, which will consist of a 443± SF fenced lease area on an elevated steel platform, will contain Verizon Wireless ground equipment and an emergency backup diesel generator. It will be screened along its westerly boundary by 14' high evergreen shrubbery along its northerly and westerly boundaries. The Applicant will require a variance ("Variance") for a side yard setback of 7'3" for the proposed Compound to the westerly property line, where 25' is required by Town Code. This proposed Variance is not substantial since it is merely following the existing setback (7.1') of the adjacent AT&T compound that was approved by the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals in 2012. In addition, any minimal effect this Variance may have will be mitigated by the evergreen screening and fencing the Applicant proposes. r i 3 7095TDescription of Property and SurroundingNeighborhood -k-7095- The he Property is situated along the southerly side of Main Road (State Road 25), approximately 1,050' easterly of Cedar Birch Road, in the Hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, New York. It is also known and designated by Suffolk County Tax Map Number: District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1. The Property contains a total site area of 4.70± acres and is situated within a Marine II zoning district. The Property front along Gardiners Bay to its south, and is abutted on its west by Orient State Park, and a Federally- owned Plum Island-related facility to its east. Across Main Road to the north are single- family residences. Nearby to the east is the Orient Point Ferry terminal. Scope of the Report In preparing this Report, the appraiser: - Inspected the Property and surrounding community on January 10, 2017; - Reviewed the engineering drawings as supplied by William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP; - Reviewed Suffolk County and Town of Southold assessment, tax map, and zoning records; - Researched sales trends in the area of the Property in addition to comparable sites throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island; - Prepared this Report in conformance with USPAP requirements. Report Methodology In analyzing any potential adverse effect the Communications Facility may have on the surrounding community, the appraiser considered the proposed build of the Communications Facility on a commercial property presently developed with a wireless communications facility, the surrounding neighborhood and land uses, zoning classification of the subject Property and surrounding parcels, and other existing conditions. In addition, we have reviewed and carried out studies with respect to wireless communications facilities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. These communications facilities include monopole sites, lattice and guyed wire 44-7,0 tower sites, rooftop mounted sites, and water tank sites.' Two of the East End studies are as follows: Monopole Antenna Site Cherry Creek Golf Links 900 Reeves Avenue Centerville (Riverhead) New York A 130'± stealth monopole was erected at this golf course in 2003. Subsequent to the monopole, a new development of single-family residences commenced adjoining the golf course and said monopole to its east. This homeowners association, known as the "Highlands at Reeves,"had its first sale in 2006. The development includes a community pool, clubhouse, and other amenities typical to a modern homeowners association development on Long Island. The golf course and development are built on former agricultural lands. Our staff looked at sales data within the Highlands at Reeves from 2006-2014, finding 36 sales ranging from $399,000-$850,000, or on a per square foot of building area running from $136/SF-$258/SF. The average and median sale price per square foot was $197/SF and $199/SF, respectively. We then compared this above data to a very similar development located 1.5f miles to the east known as "The Highlands at Aquebogue," situated along the south side of Sound Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Long Island National Golf Club. The Highlands at Aquebogue had its first sale in 2006, with units still available as of 2014. Our researched sales run from 2006-2014, revealing 65 sales ranging from $425,000-$719,000, or on a per square foot of building area running from $135/SF-$252/SF. The average and median sale price per square foot was $201/SF and $207/SF, respectively. The difference between the two groups, utilizing average and median sale prices per square foot of building area, was very close, differing by less than 5%. Therefore, based upon these two groups of data, it does not appear that the presence of the 130' monopole had an appreciable effect on the adjacent residential community. 1 There has been insufficient data of surrounding comparable sales since the on-air date of the existing AT&T site at the subject Property to perform a study of any effect the facility may have had on property values. 5 �f4- 71* "v , AS #701 I Monopole n y Figure 1: Birdseye View of Monopole and Adjacent Development Monopole Antenna Site, PSE&G (f/k/a National Grid) Operations Center, Montauk Highway, Bridgehampton, New York. A 120'± monopole was erected at this center circa September 2000 (later replaced with a newer, near identical monopole in mid 2000's). The monopole houses several wireless carriers, with its antennas exposed on triangular platforms. This property is immediately opposite farm or reserve land, along the south side of Montauk Highway. Adjoining this land to its south and east is a newer subdivision known as West Pond Drive, which was created in the early to mid 2000's and is comprised of 1.0± acre residential lots that are approximately 75% developed. The noted monopole to the north is mostly within view of these lots due to the generally open preserve or farmland (see Figures 2 & 3). Our staff analyzed sales data of building lots that have closed within this subdivision since year 2000. Each of the following building lot sales in the following table were involved in resales (as building lots): ADDRESS& FIRST SALE FIRST SALE 2ND SALE 2ND SALE YEARS PRICE PRICE BRIDGEHAMP SALE# TAX MAP# DATE PRICE DATE PRICE BETWEEN DATES GAIN/DECLINE %/YEAR %Year 1 11 West Pond Dr 11/17/00 $750,000 6/14/05 $1,650,000 4.58 120% 26.20% 20.06% 900-84-1-32 3 2 19 West Pond Dr. 11/24/00 $765,000 11/11/02 $991,000 1.96 30% 15.07% -0.19% 900-84-1-32.6 3 29 West Pond Dr 12/15/00 $1,200,000 6/24/05 $1,975,000 451 65°% 14.32% 16 82% 900-84-1-32 11 4 38 West Pond Dr 3/14/05 $1,350,000 6/15/12 $2,200,000 726 63% 8.67% 8 05°% 900-84-1-32 16 Mean. 16.07% 11.19% The data indicates that the building lot sales in the subdivision, when resold, appreciated at a rate that was generally at or above the overall market value change during the same respective date for all of Bridgehampton.2 This leads the appraiser to conclude that the presence of the 120' monopole did not appear to lead to a devaluation of the nearby building lot property values. a �L Monopole 1 . u s Figure 2: Birdseye View of PSE&G Center,Monopole, and nearby West Pond Drive,Looking East 2Data was compiled on sold residential properties sourced from GeoData Direct for the hamlet of Bridgehampton. Figure 3: View of Monopole on PSE&G Center Looking North from West Pond Dr. Further Studies Other studies carried out on Long Island include the effects of a 300' lattice tower on luxury housing along Southwoods Road, Woodbury, New York. We studied the effects of a stealth "flagpole" monopole wireless communications facilities at the Baldwin Fire Department, Grand Avenue, Baldwin, New York, and the Valley Stream Fire Department, 190 Cochran Place, Valley Stream, New York. We studied the effects of a 75' stealth monopole at a municipal golf course and its effect on a surrounding residential community in Smithtown, New York. And lastly, we studied the effects of a LIPA transmission pole (w/affixed antennas) on a residential community in Rocky Point, New York. These studies are summarized as follows: A. Lattice Tower, South Woods Road, Woodbury, New York. An approximate 300' lighted lattice tower (Nassau County Tax Map # 15-F-1464), originally for T.V. broadcasting, was constructed in 1971 along the west side of South Woods Road,just south of Syosset-Woodbury Road, on the Syosset-Woodbury border (see Figures 4 & 5). For at least the last 20 years, the tower has also housed cellular carriers in addition to other communications and emergency service apparatus. 8 -70A3 Immediately opposite this tower, along the east side of South Woods Road, are a series of newer housing developments (Pironi Estates, Archwood Estates and Rolling Hills) that commenced in 1994±. These developments consist of a mix of luxury homes built on approximately % acre of land, all sharing relatively similar utility, size and appeal. Many of the homes are within clear sight of the lighted tower due to the extreme height of said structure. Two such streets off South Woods Road, Shannon Drive and the northerly portion of Chauncey Place, possess the greatest visibility of the tower. In fact, the base of the tower is approximately 315' away from the nearest residential structure along Shannon Drive. Sales data of residences from these two affected streets was collected dating back to year 2000. Eleven (11) sales were collected, utilizing GeoData Plus LLC, with sales dates ranging from September 2000 to September 2015. They ranged in sale price from $815,000 - $2,100,000, with a mean and median of$1,461,064 and $1,450,000, respectively. Our firm then researched sales in the southerly portion of the developments that were not within view of the tower. Thirty (30) sales were collected along Woodbury Farms Drive, Caumsett Farms Lane, Caumsett Woods Lane, Caumsett Place and Chauncey Place (southerly end), with sales dates ranging from April 2000 to September 2015. They ranged in sale price from $810,000 - $1,895,000, with a mean and median of $1,405,070 and $1,430,000, respectively. Therefore, based upon our study, the presence of a very unsightly, 300' lattice tower did not appear to affect the sale prices of the luxury homes we researched that were in view of the structure. 9 moi, i ,; 11 Figure 4: View of Luxury Homes along Shannon Dr. w/300'Tower in Backdrop fro � Figure 5: Bing Maps Aerial View of Tower and Neighborhood in Woodbury Immediately to East, Oriented North 01,3 10 B. Flagpole Wireless Communications Facility, Baldwin Fire Department S/W/C Grand Avenue & Rose Blvd., Baldwin New York. A 90'± flagpole mounted w/internal antennas was erected on this site in approximately July 1999. This property is adjacent to a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings. Our office studied eight (8) single-family properties that sold in the immediate vicinity both before and after the installation of the wireless communications facility. For the most part, the dwellings were substantially similar or received minor updating prior to their respective re-sale. The results are as follows: ADDRESS& SALE DATE SALE PRICE SALE DATE SALE PRICE YEARS PRICE PRICE SALE# TAX MAP# BEFORE BEFORE AFrER AFTER BETWEEN DATES DIFFERENCE %/YEAR 1 575 ROSE BLVD. 12/9/94 $163,000 3/8/05 $392,000 10.25 140% 13.66% 36-210-238 2 582 ROSE BLVD 7/13/98 $177,000 1/17/03 $351,000 4.51 98% 21 72% 36-213-269 3 597 ROSE BLVD 8/31/98 $159,500 6/27/02 $280,000 3.82 76% 19.78% 36-210-229 4 618 ROSE BLVD 8/13/98 $139,550 9/21/00 $184,000 2.11 32% 15 10% 36-213-49 5 653 ROSE BLVD 12/26/95 $155,000 4/11/03 $297,000 7.30 92% 12.55% 36-211-97 6 659 ROSE BLVD 7/12/95 $131,500 12/23/02 $287,370 7.45 119% 15.96% 36-211-95 7 667 ROSE BLVD 8/2/93 $115,000 9/22/03 $310,000 10.15 170% 16.76% 36-211-190 8 690 STRATFORD RD 11/4/94 $125,000 4/21/00 $210,000 5.47 68% 12.44% What we found was that in each case, the market appreciation of each property met or exceeded the overall market change for Baldwin as a whole. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the wireless communications facility did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values. C. Stealth Monopole (Unipole) Wireless Communications Facility, Valley Stream Fire Department, 190 Cochran Place Village of Valley Stream New York. A 70'f stealth monopole (unipole) wireless communications facility was erected on Village-owned land as part of the Valley Stream Fire Department in approximately the Spring of 2005. This property is adjacent to a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively homogenous group of single-family dwellings sharing similar appeal and utility. Our office studied eight(8) single-family properties that sold in the immediate vicinity both before and after the installation of the wireless communications facility. For the most part, the dwellings were substantially similar or received minor updating prior to their respective re-sale. The results are as follows: ' ADDRESS& SALE DATE SALE PRICE SALE DATE SALE PRICE YEARS PRICE PRICE MLS CHANGE SALE# TAX MAP A BEFORE BEFORE AEIE$ AFTEg BEyy N DATES DIFFERENCE %/YEAR, 1 23 South Drive Sep-94 $115,000 Jan-07 $372,000 12.30 223% 18.130 13.82% 39-404-6 2 35 South Drive Feb-03 $275,000 Sep-06 $450,000 3.58 63% 17.60% 13.97% 39-404-9 3 3 South Drive Oct-01 $250,000 Oct-06 $413,000 5.00 66% 13.20% 16.73% 39-404-1 4 55 South Drive Jun-01 $242,000 Dec-05 $425,000 450 76% 16.80% 15.96% 39-404-30 5 14 Pershing Avenue Apr-01 $223,000 Aug-06 $420,000 5.34 88% 16.64% 16.29% 39-404-30 6 70 Pershing Avenue Jan-01 $231,500 Jul-06 $430,000 5.50 86% 15.60% 16.60% 39-404-44 7 18 Birch Lane Jun-91 $160,000 Jun-06 $517,000 15.00 223% 14.80% 11.80% 39-589-93 8 60 Birch Lane Sep-96 $115,000 Dec-06 $383,000 10.26 233% 22.710/0 16.86% 39-480-9 Mean: 16:94% 15.25% What we found was that in each case, the market appreciation of each property generally met or exceeded the overall market change for Valley Stream as a whole. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the wireless communications facility did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values. D. Monopole Wireless Communications Facility, World Gym, Middle Country Road (S.R. 25), Coram, New York. A 130'± monopole wireless communications facility was erected on this site in approximately July 1,999. This property is adjacent to a stable residential 12 _703 neighborhood comprised of a relatively homogenous group of single-family dwellings sharing similar appeal and utility. Our office studied nine (9) single-family properties that sold in the immediate vicinity both before and after the installation of the wireless communications facility. For the most part, the dwellings were substantially similar or received minor updating prior to their respective re-sale: The results follow on the next page: ADDRESS& SALE DATE SALE PRICE SALE DATE SALE PRICE YEARS PRICE PRICE SALE# TAX MAP# BEFORE BEFORE QTR AFTER BETW EN DATES DIFFERENCE %IYEAR 1 1 FLINT LANE Jul-93 $126,000 Sep-02 $260,000 9.20 106% 11.52% 0200-448-5-24 2 5 FLINT LANE May-91 $134,500 Sep-99 $170,000 8.34 26% 3.12% 0200-448-5-26 3 8 FLINT LANE 3an-97 $129,000 May-07 $350,000 10.33 171% 16.55% 0200-448-5-31 4 9 FLINT LANE Feb-98 $141,500 Mar-06 $367,900 8.08 160% 19.80% 0200-448-5-28 5 19 FOLSOM LANE Nov-93 $117,000 Jan-03 $275,000 9.17 135% 14.72% 0200-448-5-12 6 18 FAIRWOOD LANE May-96 $125,000 Mar-04 $310,000 7.84 148% 18.88% 0200-448-5-35 7 22 FAIRWOOD LANE Jul-98 $137,500 Nov-01 $212,500 3.33 54% 16.22% 0200-448-5-37 8 1 FILMORE AVE. Sep-98 $135,000 Jan-02 $214,000 3.33 59% 17.57% 0200-449-1-10 9 21 HARRIS_ON AVE. Oct-98 $104,000 Sep-01 $155,000 2.92 49% 16.78% 0200-449-3-4 What we found was that in each case, the market appreciation of each property generally met or exceeded the overall market change for Coram as a whole. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the wireless communications facility did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values. E. Monopole Antenna Site Smithtown Landing Golf Course 495 Landing Avenue Smithtown, New York A 75'stealth monopole was constructed on this municipal golf 13 Boa course in late 2009. We researched the immediate residential neighborhood surrounding the golf course to see if the presence of the existing communications facility had any adverse effect on residential real property sale prices situated therein. Utilizing GeoData Plus Comparable Sales Service we examined residential sales prices for homes in the golf course's immediate area (within a one-mile radius of the golf course) for the six month period preceding the date of permit issue for the existing facility (on or around October 9, 2009) as well as the six month period post dating the approximate date of installation of the facility (first six months of 2010). A comparison of residential sale prices over said two time periods revealed a decline in sale prices of homes in the golf course's immediate neighborhood of 4.45%. We then compared said price trend from the immediate neighborhood to the larger Smithtown community (experienced a 4.60% decline in value) as well as Suffolk County as a whole (experienced a 3.75% decline in value). Recalling that the immediate area of the golf course and regional residential real estate markets were in the midst of a downturn, a comparison of the golf course's residential neighborhood value trend was consistent with both the larger Smithtown community as well as Suffolk County as a whole. In light of the foregoing, it appears reasonable to conclude that the construction of the communications facility at the golf course did not lead to a devaluation of the surrounding residential properties. F. LIPA Transmission Pole (T-Mobile Site), Westchester Drive & Estate CourtRocky Point, New York. A 125'± LIPA transmission pole site was fitted with T-Mobile antennas and associated equipment in 2010, with an on-air date of 10/14/10. This site is located along a LIPA right-of-way that is bordered on both sides by single-family residential development. Sales of single-family homes within a 1/4-mile radius of the site were researched in the four years prior to, and after the on-air date (10/14/10) of the communications facility. We utilized GeoData Plus, LLC and the Multiple Listing Service "MLS" for our closed sales data. For the four years preceding the date of construction, the data shows 15 transactions of single-family residences within a 1/4-mile of the site closing at a median sales price of $335,000±. In the subsequent four years to the on-air date, there were 11 transactions of single-family residences closing at a median sales price of$325,000±, which represents a decrease in the median sales price of 2.99%. During the same time periods, we looked at overall single-family sales in the Hamlet of Rocky Point, 14 -105 Town of Brookhaven, as reported by MLS, which shows median sale prices fell 19.77%, with a"before"median sale price of$290,000, and an"after" sale price of$234,500. In addition, #3 Estate Court (Suffolk Tax Map #200-74-7-7), which abuts the LIPA right- of-way and is immediately south of the transmission tower and T-Mobile site, sold 12/14/10 for $332,000, just after the on-air date of the site. The home consists of a Hi- Ranch style residence on one-half acre. In researching Hi-Ranch/Raised-Ranch style homes sales in Rocky Point over the past 4.5± years, only two such sales out of 39 sold at a higher sales price, one of which was a waterview residence. The presence of the LIPA Transmission Tower communications facility (T-Mobile), therefore, did not appear to lead to a devaluation in property values of the immediate surrounding residences located within a 1/4 mile radius, or of the abutting residence to the south of the site on 3 Estate Court. LIPA/T-Mobile Pole 3 Estate Ct. �a Figure 6: Birdseye Aerial View of LIPA Transmission Pole w/Affixed T-Mobile Antennas,Located off Westchester Drive & Estate Court,Rocky Point 15 Conclusions In summary, we offer the following conclusions: The proposed Communications Facility is an appropriate use for the Property, given that it will involve a colocation (with AT&T) and Modification to an existing concealment Monopole that will conceal the Verizon Wireless antennas, and the associated ground equipment will be well screened from view by fencing and additional evergreen shrubbery. The Communications Facility will be located at an existing wireless site at the southwest corner of the Property, adjacent to Gardiners Bay and the maximum distance possible from the residences on Main Road. The overall Property is utilized as a commercial marina and restaurant, and is situated within a Marine II (M-II) zoning district. The Property is well suited for the Communications Facility, given existing conditions, land uses and zoning in the surrounding neighborhood. The design of the Communications Facility will be consistent with the existing AT&T facility at the Property. No correlation was found between the presence of wireless communication facilities and declining property values in the studies we reviewed or carried out on communities in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, including the East End of Long Island. The proposed Verizon Wireless Communications Facility and necessary side yard Variance, therefore, will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area and will not have any adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. 16 ADDENDA 17 PHOTOGRAPHS & EXISTING CONDITIONS 18 sip Subject Property Looking South from Main Road rum wry l �� a� a.a,►;, v , ox� �✓i^ ..idol/r Photo 2: Interior View of Subject Property Looking North 19 -103 a / s „ io �y n 3•�i t sk" Photo 3: Interior View of Subject Property Looking Southeast y> Photo 4: View of Existing AT&T Site and Concealment Pole, Looking Northwest t- Y a 4' 20 "holo View Looking South at Shoreline of Subject Property and Gardiners Bay y rte: Photo 6: View from Subject Property of Abutting Orient State Park to West f 02, k i Photo 7: View Looking East from Subject Property of Abutting Plum Island Facility i PT I Vr r.Yrnr..+rr � v,,vLz: 2 a ,Y f Photo 8: View Looking East from Subject Property of Nearby Ferry Terminal 22 , _ � x G Photo View of Main Road Looking East near Entrance to Subject Property Photo 10: View of Residence Diagonally Opposite Subject Property to Northwest along Main Road 23 Exist. AT&T Site Photo 11 B■r s y View o Subject Property,£x■■sins AT&T Site/Proposed Location of Verizon Facility, and Surrounding Neighborhood Oriented North 24 TAX MAP & ENGINEERING DRAWINGS k— 7y 15UWD �� � ° � n ��A Puns .-- ,. --`K•'^""a-•_�— .—._.--�,___ dv—Ge'-u--•s��--^._� IvqG _-✓W If � '� � o � .] +ff of ,�t�mt f d�,x' ,s S �i 65 ✓ T l OT',9 n" tl - wrn v f.sys. i J' ' � }.to � �t]f•• `" LUY °D �� J �3 01 a StYi -5ri"2r a.w id E ' •fa `YM,."`Y�t � //+ c6 _ 2 v.z, x� fr,*a r, � '�yfu �- f.,�'a or,i, 0.•'3. �'� µ3 © f y�oua A`i 1 , I f+or+ xu�oaCCU YTY OF SUFFOLK © [ v SWTH0L0 Red ProPerf y iaz Service Agency v — 015 x '�too0 ---- F,.,�cg,r e+r< N _ (n pxrtlCto Wt4 ,.nw Y' x..mobm LWtl ldtlFZ&0°0 0 L d$ NFLS-tlo-0M CN Ah - .� N a,m9 v¢iimn a � 1]4159?aWllitl2vn tl4f 9°-WLg SUGn?tliM3tl 9vm9I IM5 aa5n.u9 a°s°9 �ti� Q}Nyti 31SV1 ONNOZ NW 316 T4RIIJ31iGri mum � .Z INdOd INMO. pUOZIJGA ® w �aam ate. vu v a9 au m,¢aur a+m.a a:a mmm Z ME iota �/ ip � •; pp r �, � r � 1 I �\ mmr-v r is wu v�•�mmm�wrYO'i, 1m i �v]amaw srsn10]0 mrus aw % / _ � ° * / • D` `�of �\a �msn)�ert Baa„�.�9 L„� ,� �j �.,s „� P.� .•o� cnmO�°Spo]> a e..a as i i I 'A a]vmac iiia •. �� cV99NOM+oW Wcay J3QS1N oar°a•oiw°.n•ourrm a� a^ � i�'"imm1ptlj°«t0°an�n�t �����S1N 31VJ5� ��• ' Tl N-X Js �IV13O 3-IV8 AVH b -11tl13a F�NFF l�IS £ ]m¢o+]xa�°anto]u9mV]w x>m i o<vxranm `\ � --- � 4 0<x>er��� w m®•s GYRO—•^40p0p44nua LUo.m St,l`J]3 1 VI H J•L,V ]ov9w e<u9.wu i rx¢ou:.asrn aY ma w�w�•\ p'•Y1�° ' orxao oxer] ��.� mnum\ 9 sae \ iv _ w�°wava a taw smt ..•� 3Ynm¢pa x ihm naa ]umu otof muvw z i i �Rg�faiil sm xwl xcri m_ mdv pcit �4 � �77 11 I CN 00.00 �� SlIV13013NIBV0 3OON3 ZIL6 b ~ NOLLVh3.131Stl3 Z ung uR� �1 rm uava��xme KP mon mm� i 9 � 6 B 6 8 ffi SlIVl34 .o-'AFAllyg 6 -- { ,ty .}« ''^`� AN R 13NI8V0 '';r.� s a R R tM w,�i�M;� v m.nneo[.ry e.imo wrou.mu w.w I • y � O ® ® xcnv.0® �,nn�mmraDr..0 m w• I � � 8 uarn um.am mm�'i[mo. arnvu wu wN1 vcn r.•a�w..U[mmr ¢3 Lr 'minwv w A,.+a ovuam va-n d� NVId.N3Wdnl 3 GMlOII -1N3 w®.vw•m,-mow. �W a W moue �®awu uon wv, lo �. ��, r•�—M��[.,`,:>� n�.�,wn�,,��,mow„[.. ,.�„ C3. 28 Certification, Assumptions & Limiting Conditions Qualifications of the Appraiser 29 CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the , reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the Subject property or personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of the report or the parties involved. I have performed no services as an appraiser, or in any other capacity, regarding the subject property within the three-year period immediately preceding the acceptance of this assignment. 4. my engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 5. my compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 6. I made a personal inspection of the property, which is the subject of this report, on January 10, 2017 7. no one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. Michael J. Lynch l 30 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This report has been made with the following general assumptions: 1. No responsibility is assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations. Title to the property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. 2. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy. 31, All engineering is assumed to be correct. The plot plans, drawings, and illustrative material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. 4. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. The report has been made with the following general limiting conditions: 1. The information contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated in this report. The appraiser is not responsible for the unauthorized use of this report. 2. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. 3. The appraiser herein by reason of this report is not required to give further consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made. 4. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. 31 Michael J. Lynch Certified N.Y.S. General Real Estate Appraiser #46-1012 QUALIFICATIONS Real estate appraiser since 1981. President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd.,located at 15 Dewey Street,Huntington, New York 11743. Appraised various types of real property on Long Island,New York City and Westchester County including multi-family dwellings,apartment buildings, commercial property,factories,warehouses,R & D buildings,office buildings, large residential estates,residential and commercial subdivisions,boat yards,and special- use properties. Prepared appraisals for use in estates,estate planning,feasibility studies, condemnation proceedings,tax certiorari, and matrimonial matters. Specialized in testimony such as area or use variances for properties. Applications have included proposed wireless communications sites,fast-food establishments, convalescent homes, service stations,convenience stores,multi-family residences, new construction,etc. Appeared as Expert Witness: Nassau County Supreme Court. New York Supreme Court. Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Babylon Planning Board. Town of Babylon Town Board. Town of Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Brookhaven Planning Board. Town of Brookhaven Town Board. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Huntington Planning Board. Town of Huntington Town Board. Town of Islip Town Board. Town of Islip Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Planning Board. Town of Riverhead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Smithtown Town Board. Town of Southampton Planning Board. Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. 32 Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): 0 A,3 Town of Southold Planning Board. Town of Oyster Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Oyster Bay Town Board. Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Town Board. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bayville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Brookville Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Cedarhurst Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Cove Neck Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of East Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of East Rockaway Board of Appeals. Village of Farmingdale Board of Trustees. Village of Farmingdale Planning Board. Village of Floral Park Board of Trustees. Village of Freeport Planning Board. Village of Freeport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Garden City Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Garden City Board of Trustees. Village of Garden City Planning Commission. Village of Great Neck Plaza Board of Trustees. Village of Great Neck Estates Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Hempstead Personal Wireless Services Facilities Review Board. Village of Lattingtown Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Laurel Hollow Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Lawrence Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lynbrook Board of Trustees. Village of Malverne Board of Trustees. Village of Massapequa Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Matinecock Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Mill Neck Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Mineola Board of Trustees. Village of Munsey Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Board of Trustees. Village of New Hyde Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of North Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees. Village of Muttontown Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Old Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Old Westbury Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Zoning Appeals. 33 Appeared as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Oyster Bay Cove Board of Trustees. Village of Oyster Bay Cove Planning Board. Village of Port Washington North Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Rockville Centre Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Roslyn Board of Trustees. Village of Roslyn Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Sands Point Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Sea Cliff Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Upper Brookville Board of Trustees. Village of Upper Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Valley Stream Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Westbury Board of Trustees. Village of Westbury Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Williston Park Board of Trustees. Village of Williston Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Asharoken Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Huntington Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Islandia Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Lloyd Harbor Planning Board. Village of Lloyd Harbor Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Northport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Northport Board of Architectural & Historic Review. Village of East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lindenhurst Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lake Grove Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bellport Board of Trustees. Village of Patchogue Planning Board. Village of Port Jefferson Board of Trustees. Village of Quogue Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Southampton Planning Board. Village of The Branch Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Head of the Harbor Board of Trustees. Village of Westhampton Beach Board of Trustees. City of Glen Cove Planning Board. City of Glen Cove Zoning Board of Appeals. City of Long Beach Zoning Board of Appeals. 34 4143 PARTIAL LIST OF MUNICIPAL CLIENTS Town of Oyster Bay (Office of Town Attorney) Town of N. Hempstead (Community Development Agency) Village of Muttontowri Village of Centre Island Village of Upper Brookville Locust Valley Water District EDUCATION Hofstra University,Hempstead,New York: BBA - Management(1983); MBA - Banking & Finance (1991). TECHNICAL TRAINING Appraisal Institute Real Estate Appraisal Principles - Exam#IA-1. Basic Valuation Procedures - Exam#lA-2. Capitalization Theory and Techniques,Part A, - Exam#113-A. Capitalization Theory and Tech. Part B,- successfully challenged Exam#113 B. Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation - successfully challenged Exam#2-1. Standards of Professional Practice,Part A (USPAP) - Exam#1410 Standards of Professional Practice,Part B - Exam#11420 7-Hour National USPAP Update Course (Sept. 21,2016) PINNACE TELECOM GROUP �0�3 Professional and Technical Services Telecom COMItIng ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE AsSESSM ENT ANd REPORT PREPAREd FOR NEW YORk SMSA L.iMiTEd PARTNERShip d/b/A VERiZON wiREIESS "ORIENT POINT 2" SITE 40200 MAIN ROAd ORIENT, NY MARCi 15, 2016 14 RidgEdAlE AVENUE - SUITE 260 0 CEdAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927 0 973.451.1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA 4 COMPLIANCE ANA[YSiS 7 COMPBANCE CONCLUSION 12 CERTIFICATION 13 AppENdix A. BACkcROUNd ON ThE FCC MPE LIMIT AppENdix B. SUMMARY OF ExpERT QUA[iFICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for a proposed wireless base station antenna operation on an extension to an existing monopole at 40200 Main Road in Orient, NY. Verizon Wireless refers to the site as "Orient Point 2" and the proposed operation involves directional panel antennas and transmission in the 746 MHz, 1900 MHz, and 2100 MHz frequency bands licensed to Verizon Wireless by the FCC. The FCC requires wireless antenna operators to perform an assessment of potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance,with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. ,In this case, the compliance assessment needs to take into account the RF effects of existing antenna operations at the site by AT&T. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocators to assess and assure continuing compliance based on the cumulative effects of all then-proposed and then-existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of RF levels resulting around the site in areas of unrestricted public access, that is, at ground level around the site. The compliance analysis employs a standard FCC formula for calculating the effects of the antennas in a very conservative manner, in order to overstate the RF levels and to ensure "safe-side" conclusions regarding compliance with the FCC limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the"plain-English" equivalent"times-below-the-limit factor'. 3 �0 13 The results of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case are as follows: ❑ At street level around the site, the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations is 6.3986 percent of the FCC MPE limit — well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism in the calculations, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 15 times below the FCC limit for safe, continuous exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The result of the analysis demonstrates compliance with the FCC regulations and MPE limit. Moreover, because of the extremely conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be significantly lower than the calculation results here indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, and on the existing AT&T antenna operations at the site; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ the result of the analysis, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a list of FCC references on compliance, and Appendix B summarizes the expert qualifications of the author of this report. ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table that follows provides the key compliance-related data for the proposed Verizon Wireless antenna operations. 4 General Data ; -Frequency Bands 746 MHz, 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized Antenna Type Directional Panel Antenna Centerline Height AGL 85 ft. 6 in. Antenna Line Loss 0 dB (conservatively ignored) 746 MHz Antenna Data _. Antenna Model Max. Gain) Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 16.3 dBi) RF Channels per Sector 2 @ 40 watts 1900 MHz Antenna Data Antenna Model Max. Gain) Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 17.0 dBi RF Channels per Sector 2 @ 60 watts 2100 MHz Antenna Data Antenna Model Max. Gain) Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 (17.3 dBi) RF Channels per Sector 2 @ 60 watts The antenna vertical-plane radiation pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at street level around a site. Figures 1 through 3 that follow show the vertical-plane patterns of the proposed antennas. In this type of antenna pattern diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles actually serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100th of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at 30 dB, the energy is only 1/1000th of the maximum. Note that the automatic pattern-scaling feature of our internal software may skew side-by-side visual comparisons of different antenna models, or even different parties' depictions of the same antenna model. 5 Figure 1. Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 -746 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern �t 0 deg horizon 5 dB/division Figure 2.Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 -1900 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 de horizon 5 dB/division 6 Figure 3.Amphenol CWWX063X25G00 -2100 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 deg horizon r 5 dB/division As noted at the outset, there is an existing wireless antenna operation by AT&T to include in the compliance assessment and we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed frequency bands. AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2300 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses two RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses four 20-watt channels per sector. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses two 20-watt channels and one 60-watt channel per sector. In the 2300 MHz band, AT&T uses two 50-watt channels per sector. COMPLIANCE ANALy5i5 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in 7 what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the intervening ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ (100 *TxPower* 10 (Gmax-Vdisc/10) *4)/( MPE *41c* R ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10(Gmax-Vdisci3O) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density(2Z= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The street-level MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC- recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in the Figure 4 on the next page. 8 -10cJ antenna height from R antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level 0 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 4. MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation (including each frequency band), and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If 9 -�vGo�3 all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas such as the panels commonly used in wireless communications are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single(facing) antenna sector or, in cases of non-identical parameters, the worst-case effect of any individual sector. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power, and at maximum channel capacity. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of the antenna. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the intervening ground. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur— and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very"safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table that follows provides the results of the street-level MPE% calculations for each operator, with the overall worst-case result highlighted in bold in the last column. 10 Ground Verizon Verizon Verizon Distance Wireless Wireless Wireless AT&T Total (ft) 746 MHz 1900 MHz 2100 MHz MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0397 0.0092 0.0039 0.1756 0.2284 20 0.0269 0.0212 0.0101 0.8821 0.9403 40 0.0479 0.0598 0.1686 0.3872 0.6635 60 0.2060 0.1587 0.0833 5.9506 6.3986 80 0.6586 0.3849 0.1110 2.8877 4.0422 100 0.1496 0.5642 0.5388 06281 1.8807 120 0.1016 0.1793 0.6817 0.6481 1.6107 140 0.0753 0.1876 0.2105 1.2656 1.7390 160 0.0393 0.0100 0.1204 1.4616 1.6313 180 00628 00403 0.0075 1.4596 1.5702 200 00588 00222 0.0116 2.1769 2.2695 220 00232 00105 0.0236 23895 2.4468 240 00066 00254 00116 2.4963 2.5399 260 0.0008 0.0372 0.0041 2.4718 2.5139 280 00221 00309 00135 2.3949 2.4614 300 00194 00272 0.0119 20941 2.1526 320 0.0335 0.0138 0.0110 2.1015 2.1598 340 0.0441 0.0058 0.0051 1.8663 19213 360 00510 0.0068 00020 2.0407 2.1005 380 0.0459 0.0061 00018 1.8349 1.8887 400 0.0561 0.0111 0.0069 2.2005 2.2746 420 0.0511 0.0101 0.0062 1.9986 2.0660 440 0.0739 0.0119 0.0168 1.8232 19258 460 0.0678 0.0109 0.0154 1.6698 1.7639 480 0.1162 0.0087 0.0220 2.1041 2.2510 500 0.1073 0.0081 0.0203 1.9407 2.0764 As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the calculations, the maximum calculated RF level 6.3986 percent - well below the 100-percent reference for compliance, particularly given the conservatism incorporated in the calculations. A graph of the overall street-level calculation results, provided on the next page, provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the overall calculation results shows a clear, consistent margin to the FCC compliance limit. 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit Total MPE%Results 120 d 100 a 80 0 a' 60 c as C7 40 O 0 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMPLIANCE CONCLUSION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. The analysis in this case shows that at street level around the site the maximum calculated RF level from the- combination of proposed and existing antenna operations is 6.3986 percent of the FCC general population MPE — well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level around the site is more than 15 times below the limit considered safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. The results of the analysis demonstrates compliance with the FCC regulations and associated guidelines on compliance. Moreover, because of the extremely conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be significantly lower than the calculation results here indicate. 12 CERTifiCATION The undersigned certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna operations at the subject site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations concerning RF exposure. AMW'001WA:�) 3/15/16 Dani J. Collins Date Chief chnicalOfficer 13 k-1023 APPENdiX A. BAckgROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community—notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 41025 Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (MW/CMI) (MW/CMI) 0.3- 1.34 100 100 1.34- 3.0 100 180/F2 3.0 - 30 g00/F2 180/ F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F/300 F/ 1500 1,500- 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population WE limits. Power Density (MW/CM2) 100 Occupational ------ General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 ----' 14 I I I 1 1 I Y1 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's MPE limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 I boa 3 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities — individually and collectively — are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. In addition, FCC Rules and Regulations Section 1.1307(b)(3) describes a provision known in the industry as "the 5% rule". It describes that when a specific location — like a spot on a rooftop — is subject to an overall exposure level exceeding the applicable MPE limit, operators with antennas whose MPE% contributions at the point of interest are less than 5% are exempted from the obligation otherwise shared by all operators to bring the site into compliance, and those antennas are automatically deemed by the FCC to satisfy the rooftop compliance requirement. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 9934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. 16 FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. 17 APPENdiX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: •40+ years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure •Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 20,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 •Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,500 times since 1997 •Have been accepted as an expert in New Jersey and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC Education: .B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 •M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 •Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: •Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: .Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 •Bellcore, Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 •AT&T(Corp. HQ), Director—Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 •AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ •Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: .Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards& Kelcey, and PTG •While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models for predicting RF exposure •Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting/engineering firms Other Background. •Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) •Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services(Bellcore, 1993) •National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 •Have published more than 35 articles in industry magazines 18 FEB 2017 D RF Report Proposed Orient Point 2 Communication Facility 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY I r!i z__ December 14, 2016 C Squared Systems,LLC 65 Dartmouth Drive Systems tems Auburn,603-644-2800 E-mail:support@csquaredsystems.com Table of Contents *-M23 1.0 Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................2 2.0 Mobile Communications System Design.....................................................................................................2 2.1 System Considerations..............................................................................................................................2 2.2 System Evaluation.....................................................................................................................................2 3.0 Existing Network..........................................................................................................................................3 4.0 Site Need.......................................................................................................................................................4 5.0 Resulting Solution........................................................................................................................................5 6.0 Summary.......................................................................................................................................................6 , 7.0 Qualifications, Statement of Certification, and Resume...............................................................................7 List of Tables Table 1: Existing Site Inventory Information..........................................................................................................3 Table of Figures FigureA—Site Inventory......................................................................................................................................4-3 FigureB—Existing 700 MHz Coverage...............................................................................................................54 Figure C—Proposed 700 MHz Coverage..............................................................................................................6-5 C Squared Systems,LLC 1 December 14,2016 -7®x,3 1.0 Executive Summary New York SMSA Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") is a public utility under the laws of the State of New York and it holds six licenses from the Federal Communications Commission("FCC") to serve the public within, among other areas,Orient,New York.Verizon Wireless' objective is to provide seamless,reliable wireless coverage to its users in accordance with the Wireless Communication and Public Safety Act of 1999.1 Verizon Wireless is providing the following information in support of its Area Variance Application to the Town of Southold in order to construct, operate and maintain the proposed wireless telecommunications facility in Orient, New York. This report addresses Verizon Wireless' need for the proposed facility and confirms that there are no other suitable existing structures that meet Verizon Wireless' service objectives for this area. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility, to be located at 40200 Main Road, Orient,New York,is needed to provide coverage to address the existing deficiency in the Orient area. Included in this report is a brief summary of the site objectives and radio frequency(RF) coverage plots showing the predicted coverage that this site will provide to the Orient area. 2.0 Mobile Communications System Design 2.1 System Considerations Mobile telephony is a method of communication by radio consisting of mobile units,either mounted in vehicles or hand-held,that transmits to and receives signals from fixed base stations(cell sites). Base stations(cell sites)communicate with mobile wireless devices by sending and receiving signals within a small geographic area. The cell site in turn connects the mobile device to the landline telephone network The cell sites are designed to cover a small geographic area because mobile telephony devices utilize low power. In addition, the frequencies licensed by the FCC are significantly weakened by obstructions, such as terrain, foliage and buildings which can make the coverage irregular and unreliable. Therefore, it is necessary to locate cell sites at suitable locations and heights in order to provide a seamless and reliable grade of service to the public. Seamless,reliable coverage provides users with the ability to successfully originate receive and maintain quality calls throughout a service area. Overlapping coverage is required for users to be able to move throughout the service area and reliably"hand-off'between cells to maintain uninterrupted calls. As a customer making a call in the vicinity of a cell site moves about and begins to move further away from the cell site, the coverage from that cell site becomes weaker. Unlike broadcast radio, as the customer travels, the call is transferred ("handed-off') to an adjacent cell site, if and when that cell site's signal level becomes sufficiently strong. With sufficient overlapping coverage(i.e.,when reliable coverage areas are overlapping),this process is transparent to the user. To establish the necessary distribution of cell sites and help ensure that coverage is seamless and reliable,cell sites are strategically located throughout the licensed coverage area based upon,among other things,network efficiency,topography of the land,and the location of other cell sites. When a significant service deficiency exists,the ability for effective communication is diminished and service can seriously deteriorate in that region. In these conditions, customers experience the inability to make calls, lost calls, partial conversations, unreliable/slow data connections and/or inaudible conversation. 2.2 System Evaluation System design and evaluation is performed primarily through propagation analysis. Propagation models are widely recognized and accepted in the wireless telecommunications industry as accurate and are routinely utilized. Propagation models simulate how radio waves travel through the environment from one point to another. In order to accurately model the behavior of these radio waves,features in the environment such as elevation of the terrain(e.g.hilly or flat)and the presence of land use classifications must be taken into account. Land use classifications include such designations as buildings, water, trees, and others. Both elevation and land use data are required to accurately model the real-world behavior of a network because these factors significantly impact radio signal propagation. All propagation modeling performed for the proposed communications facility utilized high-resolution(30 meter) elevation and land use data. Since signal propagation characteristics differ through open,forested,residential or business areas,land use classifications are used to account for these differences. The model used in this evaluation employed a sophisticated diffraction based algorithm based on Fresnel-Kirchoff theory that takes into account the terrain and land use along the path from the transmitter to the receiver. A model was generated by collecting empirical data throughout the region and modifying user defined parameters utilized by the algorithm, such that a high degree of correlation between empirical and predicted results is achieved. When that is complete,the resulting propagation model software can predict coverage levels from a transmitter facility given the specific equipment configuration(antenna model,antenna height,power,etc.)of the site in question. 'United States Code Title 47,Section 615,amended February 13,2003. C Squared Systems,LLC 2 December 14,2016 3.0 Existing Network Table 1 below includes all Verizon Wireless' existing sites that are located in the Town of Southold vicinity of the proposed facility and details the existing network site-specific information used to perform the coverage analysis and generate the coverage analysis plots provided herein. ;Disianc&to,. Antenna t Ground - Oneni Point 2 SiteName Street Address . City• ` . =Latitude Longitude Ceriferline(ft):Elevation' ft) miles). Mattituck Eli aWs Lane&RT 25 Southold 40.9994 -72.5114 78 26 17.5 Orient Point 23300 Main Road Orient 41.1425 -72.2986 67.5 14 2.9 Mattituck Relo 1000 Pike Street Mattituck 40.9929 -72.5332 115.5 10 18.7 Peconic Peconic Ave Peconic 41.0413 -72.4585 100.1 16 13.6 Greenport Relo Washington Ave Greenport 41.1093 -72.3682 180 7 7.1 Cutchogue 121855 Country Rd East 1 Cutchogue 41.0301 -72.497 105.6 52 15 7 East Marion 19245 Main Road East Marion 41.1283 -72.3413 95.5 36 5.3 Table 1: Site Inventory Information Additionally,Figure A below shows a map of the inventory of existing and proposed sites with respect to the location of the proposed communications facility. C Squared Systems,LLC 3 December 14,2016 -`70 R3 Orient Point 2 l 40200 Main Road Figure A :w ,T Orient,New York N410910.57 g W721439.08 GE:5'AMSL < Centerline 8416"AGL ° d v �m.♦"`"4� �o Pei t2y r' so U V or to 0.9 ° gi ht Rdal 75 tD �d QME0 T a St xi St CP �0 m♦N A tia n ... .✓ o a 'Sig ^`h " lo:;" ,.. * .„N.: YM1`I'�@s" , 0" Ail Subject Site FxistingSite le :' ♦ a, -<-80&>=-85 dBm 40200 Main Road OENERA Rores Neighbor Sites Orient Point 2 I ffift n' BAR[ ON Orient,New York • DATE:0=92016 Figure A—Site Inventory 4.0 Site Need There is a serious service deficiency in Verizon Wireless' wireless coverage in the Orient objective. A deficiency in coverage is evidenced by the inability to adequately and reliably transmit/receive and maintain quality calls, and establish and maintain data sessions. Due to the location and height of Verizon Wireless' existing facilities, along with the area topography, much of the areas surrounding the proposed site lack adequate reliable coverage. Figure B shows the level of existing coverage in the Orient area which is based on the minimum required signal strength for reliable in- building nbuilding and in-vehicle service for 700 MHz frequencies,which are-80 dBm and-85 Min,respectively. The white areas represent unreliable service areas. As depicted in this propagation map, there is currently a large portion of Orient, and the surrounding area where Verizon Wireless does not have reliable service. C Squared Systems,LLC 4 December 14,2016 i---f®a3 Orient Point 2 40200 Main Road Figure B Orient,New York N410910.57 ° W72 14 39.08 , GE:5'AMSL r Centerline 84'6"AGL " PdIN ® a tltd of o '' pfd .. y r ;O�RIEIV,'N'P;O�! f} �.. , •,.x'„', to Orchard 6+ 0 h 'y' c 3, P i:�'x .1 "x ,4��.,D't°k l' i„ • 4y'4, " ". ,.x.,; . ,. N: .v ' f Subject Site Existing Site Yq�,. 6 ®>=-80 dBm <.80&>=85dB. �aereexa�xores Existing Coverage Orient Point 2 40200 Main Road y�piz®n/ A, ,07 700 MHz LTE Orient,New York i DATE 07!2912016 Figure B-Existing 700 MHz Coverage 5.0 Resulting Solution In order to remedy the existing coverage deficiencies, Verizon Wireless is proposing to install a 20'-0" extension on the existing 69'-0" RF monopole located at 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York,in addition to the following: a. Three(3)panel antennas(the"Antennas")will be concealed inside the proposed 20'-0"extension,with Antenna centerline heights of+/-84'-6"AGL; b. An equipment compound situated adjacent to the existing carrier's equipment,upon which equipment and an emergency backup generator will be located; c. Four(4)GPS units mounted on the proposed weather canopy;and d. All other appurtenances,improvements,equipment,devices,cables,conduits and wires related thereto,as more fully described on the site plans submitted with Verizon Wireless' application. The below coverage map included as Figure C illustrates how this proposed communications facility will remedy the coverage gap. C Squared Systems,LLC 5 December 14,2016 4� 7oa3 Orient Point 2 40200 Main Road Figure C Orient,New York N410910.57 W7214 39.08 GE:5'AMSL •, �? t Centerline 94'6"AGL m ©RIENpPIfVj; 3otRd tPR Bt 01 a, r ORdE 1T�POi T� t" tt "G, ' r S Oro—a CP co Subject Site Existing Site r >=-80 dBm -<-80&>=-85 dBm Existing&Proposed 40200 Main Road GENERAL NOTES �/ ■ Coverage 700 MHz LTE Orient Point 2 Orient New York Yiurizon� DATE:021 g � DATE:02/2912016 'a' Figure C-Proposed 700 MHz Coverage As can be seen in these plots,the proposed communications facility is ideally located and provides needed coverage to the Orient area. At 700 MHz frequencies, the proposed communications facility will provide in-vehicle coverage to 1.09 square miles of area, 133 people,3 businesses and 6.8 miles of roads,including 0.8 miles of main roads. It will also provide in-building coverage to 0.72 square miles of area. 6.0 Summary There are no other existing feasible structures upon which the proposed communications facility can be sited to provide the coverage requirements needed for this area. The location and the proposed minimum height of the monopole extension were chosen to achieve an optimal balance between meeting coverage objectives, clearing the local obstructions, and minimizing the aesthetic impact to the community. As depicted in the enclosed plots,the proposed Verizon Wireless communications facility,with Antenna centerline heights of 84'-6",is ideally located to provide the much needed coverage for the Orient area, along with effective connectivity to the rest of Verizon Wireless' existing network. Our analysis confirms that the proposed communications facility will provide reliable wireless coverage for the Orient area. Without this proposed communications facility, at the height proposed, significant gaps in service will exist (and remain) within this area of Orient; therefore based upon the foregoing, the proposed communications facility should be favorably considered by the Town and the application should be granted in all respects. C Squared Systems,LLC 6 December 14,2016 �3 7.0 Qualifications, Statement of Certification and Resume I am a Radio Frequency Engineer for C Squared Systems, LLC, which has been retained by Verizon Wireless. I have extensive experience in the design and testing of Verizon Wireless' communication facilities as part of its federally licensed network in New York. For example,I have participated in the design and performance of the Verizon Wireless network in New York,participated in engineering efforts to provide a quality system build-out, evaluated zoning provisions applicable to wireless communication facilities in various communities, testified before local zoning boards in zoning hearings, prepared search areas for new installations, participated in drive tests and reviewed drive test results, participated in site visits, prepared RF designs for proposed installations, reviewed plans and prepared RF packages for zoning hearings, tested and evaluated new sites, and located and corrected system performance problem areas. I have been involved in Verizon Wireless' design of the proposed wireless communication facility at the above proposed communications facility. I have personally visited the area, reviewed coverage data for the proposed installation, and reviewed RF coverage information for Verizon Wireless' existing sites. I certify to the best of my knowledge that the statements in this report are true and accurate. December 14,2016 Date Martin J.Lavin C Squared Systems,LLC C Squared Systems,LLC 7 December 14,2016 `7D J3 74Systems martm lavin@csquaredsystems.com of • . • 1 1 SUMMARY: Over twenty-five years of experience in the RF and wireless communications industry. EXPERIENCE: C Squared Systems,LLC 2008-Present Senior RF Engineer • Zoning Hearing Support • Advanced Wireless Services RF System Design • Wireless Broadband Access Systems Engineering • Drive Test Services • Intermodulation Studies • RF Exposure Studies U.S. Cellular,Bedford,NII 2002-2008 Senior RF Engineer • West Virginia/Maryland/Pennsylvania CDMA System Design and Optimization • CDMA Capacity Planning and New Site Builds • Subject Matter Expert for E-911,Public Safety Interference Issues, Collocation, and Technology Transitions Independent Wireless One(Sprint Network Affiliate),Londonderry,NII 2000-2002 Senior RF Engineer • CDMA System Buildout in New Hampshire and Vermont • Organized Field Office • RF System Design and Site Selection Point of Contact with Site Acquisition and Construction • Capacity Planning • System Performance Nextel,Reston,VA 1999-2000 Senior Manager—Technology Development • New Feature Development for the Motorola MEN system • Corporate RF Engineering Standards • Evaluation of international and domestic spectrum acquisition opportunities C Squared Systems,LLC 8 December 14,2016 USI,Chantilly,VA 1999 Program Manager • Software development projects in Europe and U.S.,including budget and schedule responsibility. • Direct client contact for requirements gathering and proposal writing. LCC International,McLean,VA 1991-1998 Manager of Engineering • Domestic and International Cellular&PCS System Design and Buildout • Nationwide GSM Network Buildouts of Australia and New Zealand • FCC PCS Pioneer's Preference • Strategic Planning for LCC Initial Public Offering • Responsible for RF Design and Site Selection for Los Angeles MTA • Wrote network equipment RFP for two PCS MTAs • Software Product Manager for CellCAD,ANET, and MetroNET • Managed Drive Test Services,including all Timesheet and Expense Approval Carl T.Jones Corporation/SAIC, Springfield,VA 1987-1991 EMC/EMI Engineer • Test and Measurement consulting for FCC compliance • Broadcast(AM-FM-TV)consulting EDUCATION: University of New Hampshire—Whittemore School of Business and Economics Master of Business Administration Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Bachelor of Science,Electrical Engineering C Squared Systems,LLC 9 December 14,2016 Planning, Zoning and Visual Impact Analysis January 2017 Proposed New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Communications Facility 40200 Main Road Hamlet of Orient Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York PREPARED FOR New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless c%Amato Law Group,PLLC 666 Old Country Road Garden City,NY 11530 PREPARED BY 100 Motor Parkway,Suite 135 Hauppauge,NY 11788 (631)787-3400 I �o � - h b Table of Contents Introduction and Methodology...........................................................................1 Proposed Wireless Communications Facility Design and Existing Site Conditions............................................................................................................3 Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis ...............................................7 Zoning and Land Use of the Site and Surrounding Area and Planning Considerations...7 Environmental Considerations.............:...........................................................15 Visual Impact Analysis...................................................................:..................16 Photographic Simulations..................... .........................................................16 Findings and Conclusions................................................................................24 List of Figures Figure1 —Site Location ....................................................................7.................2 Figure 2—Architectural Site Plan...................:...................................................5 Figure 3 East Elevation, Enlarged Equipment Plan.......................................6 Figure 4—Zoning Map Excerpt...........................................................................9 Figure 5—Aerial Photograph............................................................................10 Figure 6—APT Engineering Photo Log...........................................................17 List of Appendices Appendix A—Photographs of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area Appendix B—Letter from Suffolk County Police Department dated December 2,2016 Appendix C—Visual Assessment and Photo-Simulations by APT Engineering,October 2016 AppendbeD—Resume of Erin Echevarria,Project Manager,VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C. S Table of Contents 'Wb Introduction and Methodology VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C. (VHB)prepared a Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analysis for the proposed New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Veiizon Wireless(Verizon Wireless) wireless communications facility to be installed upon and adjacent to an existing AT&T concealment pole at 40200 Main Road,in the hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York(Figure 1). The subject property was examined as to land use and zoning,environmental conditions and visual resources.An investigation of the area and review of aerial photography were performed to examine land use on the site and in the surrounding community.Photographs were taken to document the existing land uses on the site and in the surrounding area(see Appendix A).In addition,the Town of Southold zoning map was consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding community. In order to conduct this visual analysis,the following methodology was employed: > Visual inspection of the proposed wireless communications facility location and evaluation of physical characteristics of the proposed facility. > Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon. > Analysis of photographic simulations of the proposed wireless communications facility from several identified vantage points,prepared by APT Engineering. 1 Introduction and Methodology 2 5 , �• , way 1\ y i 1 t � .r vW ! 0 160 320 i • Feet p•r tj• c F{iE E � DD Existing Facility Location Subject Property Orient Point 2 Site Location Figure 1 _ "Vhb Verizon Wireless 40200 Main Road Orient, New York 11957 o �4 'Vhb Proposed Wireless Communications Facility Design and Existing Site Conditions The proposed Verizon Wireless communications facility would be installed upon and adjacent to an existing AT&T concealment pole located at 40200 Main Road, in the hamlet of Orient,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York(SCTM District 1000—Section 15—Block 9—Lot 8.1)(see Figure 1). The subject property is currently developed with the Orient by the Sea restaurant,a marina,and associated paved parking areas,as well as the existing AT&T concealment pole and ground-based equipment. The proposed action involves the installation of a 20±-foot extension to the existing 69±-foot above grade level(agl)AT&T concealment pole at the subject property,resulting in an overall concealment pole height of 89±-feet agl. Three Verizon Wireless antennas would be concealed within the pole extension and associated equipment would be installed within a proposed equipment compound,adjacent to the existing AT&T equipment compound.The Verizon Wireless fenced equipment compound would measure 32 feet by 13 feet,10± inches(443±square feet),and would include a pier-supported steel platform (292.5±square feet)with equipment cabinets,main distribution boxes,remote radio heads and a 10-kilowatt diesel-powered emergency backup generator thereon.A weather canopy would cover portions of the equipment platform and would have four GPS units mounted thereon.The equipment compound would be surrounded by a 13-foot-tall chain-link fence(with green privacy slats),as well as 14-foot-tall evergreen plantings(eastern red cedars)for additional visual screening on the north and west sides.Associated utility conduits would be routed underground at the subject property to existing connections(see Figure 2 and Figure 3).Installation of the proposed communications facility extension and associated ground-based equipment does not involve alterations to site access or parking,nor would it involve alteration of the existing AT&T facility or the restaurant/marina uses. 3 Proposed Wireless Communications Facility Design and Existing Site Conditions As previously indicated,visual inspection of the subject property indicates that, in addition to the existing AT&T facility,the site is currently developed with a restaurant and marina,including associated structures(i.e.,trailers,restroom building and garage)as well as paved parking areas,landscaping and pedestrian areas. Beyond the subject property,the surrounding area is comprised of a mix of uses including residential,recreational and public parks(Orient Beach State Park and Orient Point County Park),government(Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Ferry Terminal)and transportation(Cross Sound Ferry Terminal). In order to better depict the nature of the site and surrounding area,several photographs are included in Appendix A. A detailed description of the land uses surrounding the site and an aerial photograph are contained in the section entitled Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis. The visual horizon in this area of the Town contains obstructions.These obstructions include numerous utility poles,overhead wires,a flag pole and lighting fixtures in the surrounding area,as well as the existing 69-foot agl concealment pole. 4 Proposed Wireless Communications Facility Design and Existing Site Conditions 1 ) ROW 1 I ) MAAp FExCIHG WIRED OR IN o.- IS T°RESTORE/VY APE,wN,.6 ARECnD By THE ONK TO Po ! I J I IWGTA LAPON OF ANY DBMS AND/OP EQUIPMENT MIHM THIs SCOPE OF BALES 1D BE SET 2 CONHHACYCH To PRIGNIDE SHE SPECIFIC IRCANO W ACCORDANCE SIG vnM Fl4TDN�0 ABRIC(NIRPFT STAKES(TIP) I ! ON CPME VERRON WIFELESS PROJECT TEC HNICAL SPECIFlGTIO„S TOR SHE SIGNAGE 1 (SEE_.N) (SEE SECTION) FIEVATION `\ CHPENNEL OR SL�t: FENCE TO IID SPR E) G aAPPS/m P ip.�O� �I!lTA IXITSRHN ENCHURGEHES iO BGON.E NAND"'AX NO!OWIS�NfiBED TWVtE OMNI WATERTIGHT TEST PRIOR TO UCKFlLLMG HdN DRAINAGE HE W TOP AND2Ln0 SECTON _ BUMMO WIRE OR X TIRE roNSTHUCTION AHO PLACEMENT OF THE FAGIJTT VIDL NOT NE(TP) 2•X 2"STARES INTERFERE VIDH PUBLIC SAFETY DXT.IGTONS AMI THE USUAL ANa EYP) TW (1w0 U[N BATE) CUSTOMARY TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION OF RMIO TEIMSIDN OR OTHER �PoSTS uPAC1FD 9�w IAC RI COUYUNICATbNS SEANCES OR RDH EfE _RNAPS, 50„U„ES yy.. ppp BACKFlLL 3 FXISTNG TKEES LCw LwNo VEGETA]ION TRALERS AND BOA15 IN AREA 5¢Vppp`O5p(000 `" S 6Y6 TPENC \ OF PROPOSED CONSDIUCDON To BE CLEARED PRIOR TO START OF ^SLOPE E,GGHNO H-PEM CONSINUCIION. FFNCE� 'oo ��RADE UIILM UNES PROM 6 ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPING S BE PIANTED TO PROVIDE A R C H I T E C T S PINE YY MHuryEYONMILE/35 NDGUDUS SCREENING TO THE NORM AND REST OF THE NEW EDUIPUENT _ 6'UPUENEIPATION WTO CHANNEL ARU 60901501E 611AGAB591 M.biamilm GR ND(SEE SECTION) FiEYATEON O r-RAGE SO COM`_BACNF61 ^ `s°`b \ > UNpsCAPING To HE KEPT IN 0000/HFALTIY CONDITION AND sN41 BE TjBT((v'Ill(Jyr REPIACED SHOULD AMY SE"(S)DIE Ai ANY POW WRING THE OUPADON Nog.PERIODIC LA ED ANEE IS REQUIRED AS NEEDED TO FENCE PND FABRIC TO /' i G OF INE SDE BEMC M USE REMOVE ACCUMULATED M41FAIf15 AND REPAIR FENCE EXTEND IMO TRENCH 4 HAY BALE DETAIL SILTFENCE DETAIL �.+ FRB..BN°DN Rat MFeRIMFR 3 SCA E NTS SCALE NTS \\ \\ N I D�RINmG THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION CERTAIN EROSION AND SUMER L MEASURES MAY BECOME NECESSARY TO PREVENT ME \ I& \ ' F SEDIMENT TO OFF-SDE AREAS PWDS WATER COURSES NOTE pRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEw VERRON wRElESs ANTENNAS__AND ETC THAT SHALL BE MOUNTED WITHIN A // �� ORAINABE INIETs ECHMGE BMI„S WETLANDS ETC ACTUAL EROSION PGa.ED ZO IXTETF510x TO THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SPALL BE PERFORMED BY A NflY TOPK STATE CONTROL MEASURE WILL BE BpI�TAIm BY FlELD CON...HS M LICENSED PROFT3YONAL FNGREEP(NOT RFC)SIGlED AND SEALED DOCMMENTATON FOR THIS WORK SHOWD BE RED`S_AND p09 SRLLL BE OBSENFD ESSES THE FOImN1NG GENERAL CONINTONS (ANI CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS ALL SUCH WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY OTHERS(NOT WFC) PROPERtt UNE TP r\\ 90 OxsUl A. EXISTING VEGETATDN TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN UIxDSTURBED WEN.OS OEl1NUTI0N SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands /\\ \/ 1 HEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDIq£D SO AS TO IUWKINS WEBS_ER PLLC 560 WALT GP_FORD MRNLLE N MINIMIZE THE SIEE OF EXPOSED MEAS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME )3Z->7P(UST GIEp N BEP 15 11 Eq NO 06-0099)ISURVM 6ANp EYISG { 4 T _] THAT MEAS ME FFPOSED WETANp BEUNUTION ORIGMeLLT PERFORMED R 6 2006 �Q P- / >H, `- u E LENGM AND STEEBPHESS OF CLURED SLOPES SHALL BE BLAMING P P �ASSVO� ✓ Ls / UMI ES RUUNNNFF SHALLL IDED To REDUCE ERINER m AwAf ROM CHEAREO SLOPES ENT 1HAIL BE-1.U„THE SDE �b GQ•(1 RSA �\ ,y SPECIFIC METHODS PNa MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTAWITON AND P �' Y' xQA/ Z •Y*` _ I MVNTERMICE of EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHAL CONFORM TO ZHE P4�(MQ NEW YORK WIDELNES MR EROSION AND SmRIENF CONTRW” NBN PROPOSED VERIZON wIREUEGS EUS TRIC CONDUITS TRENCHIED �� \ 'IPS�StP� .R(.0 +/\ y , \\ Z_ �/• ^ 'A46 2 SEDIMENT FARRIERS(SRT FENCE HAY SALES OR APPROVED EQUAL) T McAv 1. OERGROUNO TROY PPOPoSED VERIZON wREEESS_CDOCPL �.� tV.P O�Ga s.W" +� ',H \\ E% °P•� WALL RE WSFAU.V)AS REONRED ALONG THE CODS NF MSNRBMvE yT/Y 610 FW AEVEW METER AND DLSCONNECT SUPPORT RACK TO PROPOSE pT� i ''4, VV FOR THE OU�A .OF THE MONK 3R9/tl Iv.VIIO.ATWEvme COAs+is wINSESS ELECTRIC PANEL MOUNTED ON PROPOSED d �� NCjV 0 c, 7 . / 4 / BE PERUTTED RI WASH ONTO PDFACENT PROPERTIES WETLANDS OR EQUIPMENT PLATFORM F �G VERS "< +/�e aJ' i,?'aF / DADS YQ/Y WRFu+G PROPOSED 11-0'HIGH X 6-O'WIO RN Y'D`Q� / +}' \\ 3 IUZED AND GH THE USE OF AND TEMPORARY SHALL BE KEPT PED GEDMS AT V' OC TTP OE(9) �If .g \ ^ , \\\\V / SEED 11 THROUGH THE USE of ACCORDANCE AT SEEDING As REOURIED Ah0N NA S�CNI NCEREBG.SINAL BE M ACCORDANCE WITV SELL CONSER/A1roN CLOSEST D STANCE BEM'EEl UMTS OF k Q, 1 c /S E ITEC NUETUA GNI NST CLEARING AND WETIANOs � '* ^\s� e./v'' p W Yf� / 1 OMINACE INLETS INSTALLED M PMT OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE HIP THROUGH PROPOSED VERRON WRE12S5 EQUIPMENT .fes L•V x �. / \ Lh R MEIEFt OfSp / PBMREgs SEDIMENT TPPPS EWTCD AS EWWEDME USE OF-.ENT ER MOUNTED ON NEW E1tVATED �� f AND DISCONNEtt l: 5 PROPER wJNTEHANCE OF EROSION CONTRW YEASURTS IS TO BE GLVPMZED STEL PLATFORM SFE I - / J/ �f 4 E.I.UARMARINE RESTAURANT AND r + /P PENFERMED M MDIGTED BY PERIODIC INSPECDON AND AFTER RUVY OR FOR NOPE INFORMATION m / PHOUGH ED STOkHS NIENAYCE MEASURES INCLUDE BUi MB UOT NO DATE RE-H �(o'¢.•S.L E NELMG STATION /� UNITED TO LEANING GF SEDIMENT BMWs AND TRAPS \\ 'T� /� REPAIR NS BEIM NT GAHG D REEAAGR.AND INLET PRR OF BTRUS AND YNAN fx-No or Co.-.. �` // � \ �L � / Oj AttntN ROK[ 20_O�MENT MILE EX1FN9ON RIM PROPOSED / i \ M1�' e 9*`pe s-eP yhAp 9 �+ /X CO„STPUCDONTU MUMS SINAL BE USED 10 CONTROL DUST DURING FER FACILITY NOTES PR N s 1L�NoC ISTRUODGE CTION H N 6EWCB�UL BREI I' ioCdL PROPOSED FUTURES ME LIBELED AS SUCH ALL ELSE EMSTING OR ROADS THE CONSTRUCT.ENTRANCE SHALL BE__.N.UNTIL THE _ BY OTHERS IlE Is PEPMAxENTty STABILRED I B COMMUNICATIONS B Sm1MFM BARRIERS AND OMER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHNL )UNIAANPNED AND PO BE BB IHSITETED MPGR XIMATEI ONCE A MMOANMI F'OR REMAIN IN-E UPI.AND DISTURBED IREAS APS / f�0`R ',t• ` I /%/� 3T>� /�/+ UR ER pR CLUWm ANOF OmPAxAGNTEANSTSIENS"'A”AND FLusHM "cm""', _ UNE(-----) E N 5 NIT ANDGIPAIFFWUp BE REPRESFNR LLNTIS DF GENERATE MDTIIONPL NOISE NUE. .RAYONS POST G�FMIDGDS�TU i AND TWSFlC L M1 0. + ER CONGTND TON ACTIVITY POLLUTION PREVBHHON NOTE 0 BO-p' E Ql� + C)NSO N U,AAAL PARKING IS REQUIRED NR THE PROPOSED USE AS THIS ORD AND SROMENTATON CONTROL PUVT SPALL CONFORM TO THE HPb b. 1 / 1 AN UNMANNED SITE EROSION PhD SEDWENTATON RmuMEMErvIs OF THE NYSOm SPIES YAAINA� `' / A1��•(11 D)NO SOUORUWID WAS WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED EREUL PERUR TOR STURNWAIER CSCHAPGES FROM CONSTRucTaN USE s S AN U HEp 111E GD Q-D E)NO WATER OR SEWAGE FAGHTG6 ME REQUIRED FUR THE PROPOSED THE CONTRACTOR SRA,ISE RAY BNFS 11p PENCEDRGTHEq I I �PROPRY 1 uEANS O EROSION TCONTR ENT AND u NG F<a NYSDEC I QI WetlGn / r<,5 usE I�NTo DRUNAGE MLErs E L MueuREs LL BE IN 1 + PS FI THEE WUL BE xo couNERcuL oR RErut vus THE PROPOSED snE c05�T. w� BEEN YORK STATE cu1oEUNEs inP URBAN Egosax y�FPG 6)FlRNTIORWTG OF�ry D BECURIIY PR_.N5 WILL INCLUDE REMOTE 1` �\ M1 Y _ II ''@��• "� w .r1�j/ aSo�`Q )MO E 1U THIS SITE AND PL TOPSOIL TO To EMIACED EVENTYPoNTWIIIENGRAIRDED BY WIM OUST Mry TOR vera®n✓ H MEC HA TER 27 of THIS FACIIl1T SHNL ALPO BE I„C YORK STAT \ \\\\\\V \ WITH CHAPTER 2MR F THE WILDING CODE OF GROUNDING YORK STATE 1AAIIAd-S BAITER o o ¢EcmICAL WORK AND cx°urvoMG , �3 Pu SLOPES GREATER THAN c 3 slWy R oFAiRAGEDe 9PLW CONTROL "sr 6 \\ B• + AND PRDPoSED 11-0•HIGH X 6-0' !.CAPE PUN FOR ADDITONAL INMR"MATO„ ' 4 D „ BDMS AT OPoENT POINT 2' w0V E EASERRED C H /%/ 6-0'OC 51pRu Ram+RLM_OFl-usxeGFNnR pLeN 3 p u wAmR aex-OFT eEHERATED BY THE PROPBSED DOM soALL BE SET gFuwE Twxe oauETTT SNAEL RE CONTAINED wHH N THE PEMMEnA OF THE DEEP W.J N,0 BURL MOUND TOP OF ROOT Belly Lor B PROPOSED CONSTPUCDON SH CODED OOO BURLAP IN PUCE POLL BACK 1/3 OF BURIM 402DO MAN ROAD NDY AG \ i/ P�O yeP CHIPI 1 (REMOVE un1E51 BIODEr.RMABIE.) EDT HEMCINTCNTPU RSHANf TSHE HE MRWUM PROTECTED [a IUIRUT•�iEIBY RS orYTHM� ORBIT.W 11957 BDAi 15(1 p ATB STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL THESE FUTURES SEAL.REMAIN IN a,(c•" WINcx RAM smL SAUCER w UA THE CONST, DR 511E HAS BEEN PERWWE„TLY SAD, DIED 31B 11' p� O�,ALL Ox BSHOwN HEREON 6 BASED NPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY ro PEM T ERO9oN E IUwKMSTIWEBB JAEGER PLLC S60 WALT wMIUM ROM uFLRLLE MY It]1) (631)732-7777,(—uOVFM D99) 3 ALL WORK MUST CONFER„TO TEMA PMOD ZONE REWREMENS GD BX1mrve ARCFIIECTLFtAL STIE PLAN "DEC TidDl W nos + Ttl uLXHGD " �'` ZONING TABLE BER IS TO 1 PROJECT ND O6 0 UANNUDE .ISAIIHAD O]I etl0 s3rv1•wly ulv GUDny MARw L3Dtl ^ I Y HULK 70NING REOUIREMENIS §I83-56 POR UARINE 11 ZONIYC RSTRCI EE GH, e•/-A,6L INGw n) EXISTING SHORELINE V1\A ENTRANCE LpApE �j��%/ • REQUIRED PROPOSED iAx ATV fEO ON IS BLOCX9 Aro U-I vel \I RI �� ` ���Ak n POLL U �`/�/•�. / /� / @280-56 MWUW R.NT 3572 STORIES 20(B9 TOTAL NONOPOHE) I—COUDG1 I CHBOON" IM _ l BURLAP I/3 FPpR1 TAPJ 35 -]"(COMPOUND) XA —A-A—•V°EMUA�LL `l` -RFI TOPSOR �Bo-56 YNp1UY RGP Y,RD 25 697-0'(COMPOUND) U S ®o o® —T-7—TELGGI coGDNau ;1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN —E-E—E D 1G GD IT /1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL o B o WIT" §280-56 u NNu IDE YAOS r(LBNPouNo) �� SCALE_ 1 -ao-0 -T/E T/E-TELCO 6 EHECIRIs CIXAUD u�Ai §360-Se AGGrtGUE 90E YumS. 5 250-I I-(CONFOUND) I=10 o No SCPLE a !ITS Les PER YARD NORh1 3 OF 5 NOTE OMWNGS DwICi THE INSTALLATION OF NEN VENRON WREIF55 ANTENNAS LMIfS ANO ETC 1114T SWWL BE u0UH1.WRHIN A PROPoSEO 20 —SIGN POSED VENRON A CAD ICE BRIDGE WITH(12)PROPOSED DTHE EXISTING CONCEAWNENT MIS WORN ATR CTUSAL ANA IHMS—BE PERFORum A NEW YANK STATE UCENS.PROFESSIONAL.ENGINEER(NOT WFCI"RED (USE 7/e'0 ANTENNA CARL¢ SEAIEDMR BE_SEPARAT.Y AND CON UC BY WITH THEE DOCUMENTS .WORN HAS,BEEN PER.NM. pISHED UNE flEPR6FJ+15 PROPOSED VERIZON WIPk1ES5 (3) 3H)PROPOS.VEPROH WUEL65 MAIN DSTP®UbN BONES OTHERS( LEATHER CANOPY PBOVE UNIT.T°PFOPOSm UTSIRM FRAME ATOP RI) OS.VENZON WPEL65 PPH U_(STACRED) PMPOSm 225 S F STT EL OmUNNALPMENT E EQUIPMENT P—Ru ' GENERAL NOTES oUME�m PROPOS.UR,—FRAME wm Pa0P05ED WEE wmPY eD E 1 NL WORK SHAl1 BE DONE IN STRICT A<mROMCE WITH PROWLONS d'LDCN-. PROPOS.VENZON__S STEEL STAIR PROPOS.VENROH WIRELESS IORW°IESEL DC GENERATOR WITH STATE,MO FEDERAL LAWS ORCMANCES AND P1—INS WHEREVER APPLICABLE -- ---_—__ __— _—L_--- _____ _ SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOS.EIEVAIFD STEEL CONTRTOS REONREOOIR�� ANNAHSE THIRD PMIT SPECNL DUNNAGE COUP.—P_.(6{GL DIESEL—C._. INS HIS ED CHAPTER 17 WITHIN GENERATOR ENCLOSURE) LEACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NEED ro HAVE VISITED THE SITE AND TO HAVE —•—•—•—• 1 —� •— — —— __ • -• —•—7 (J)vRGPOS. VER,F ED All IXISIING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID V.IZON WRELESS •_ • �` _ _ _ Q/ _\ A N SECIOP ANTENNA J IN ALL CASES DRAWINGS SWML NOT BE SCALED.R INFORMATION FIGURED W 0(6)PROPOS. DIMEN90N5 AND.NDITIDNS RUST BE VIIRBTEp IN THE FNm ATxT EOL T �� ~� j oWIHHPLExERBHSHpos xnNc A coNTtKfOR sHUF SFT AN'BE COR A HELD DIMENSIONS I I ->•�j Iii_i 1-{- l-\ �I A R C H I T E C T S x m AND JOB mx°NGNs HUL N E MOR—OF ANY DISCREPAR.. I w 20 E%fENSNN OF CaxFLCIS M/Oa OYI59 5 FRH Um MIERFFAE AIM THE SATSUCroRY ECA_NY It]IS EU.NO MONOPOLE ED—ON OF TIE WORK SHOIRD HE FHL.FOLLOW THIS INOCmUFE AND '- ${t __ __ - -�,_ ="- I n 501E 6716 vB{59I N W CO OR61NOUE lRRNlME WORK HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSNILITT AND LM91m1' d 5 GW ITEMS OF WO uN ENTRIED ON THE DMWIRGS BY NAME NOTE.OR MATwML 1y E Ex,—B G¢I TION APE NEW MESS OIHwWSE NT. I'=�` 911] MTERI WITHONC � WHIM d DOME Poo _ MAN RAs S AND svEcnn°uno ANo wMrB1�CAUR APP-CODE I I I -r u ILLiTYs MOUNTED 1[LL00I° Q Q I -�T---__-i.�[-�-L I n_ EIENSSION R° RFOUNEUEMs I I BWEATHwUT1w1 WUTxm POSTS %� I y�� -_ 7 ALL WORK SHALL BE Pw.RIA IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STARGMD TRADE CANOPY TYPICAL.R(J) T-+- PRACTICES EACH TRADE G—CO IONAN WITH OTHER HADES TO FACILRATE JOB I I I REFER TO DETAIL72 SCX.VUNGMmmMVLETNN B PROPRIETARY NAMES IOENTIMNO ITEMS OF WORK APE USED T°DESIGNATE THE ENUR ARO OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS OF EOU4 DUAN MAY BE SUBMIT O)FORANCHS_�- - - 1TEETS REVIEW _ -1^ .7_=---.T------ EA ---- _ N EALN CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HIS WORK AHO SINY DAMAGE G AD,gINING REI EA H MUS ASA RESULT OF HIS WORK ANY DAMAGE DAMAGED /'JI ppFp A' V - - T SURFACES TO THEIR PPE-ExISTWG CONDITIONS OR AS MAY BE REOUIR.TO IL AI I `\L -_� --T '-�'.-l--I_O Ol-.L_• _�X_J,- :I CO PLLIE THE ENTFE SCOPE OF TIE WORK I. ALTwATONS TO EIIISTIC WORk SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISH.AS I •—•— — — —•—•—•— - •S _ _� _ I RECESSANY TO MATCH EHSDNG CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR HEW FINISHES SHOWN 11 AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY,EACH TNAOE SHALL BE RESPoNSUX.E FOP CLEANING UP THBR WORK RUBBISH RENO/AL S BE DONE IN A DUST HIB11NE FASHION AND THE JOB SITE SPALL BE FREE OF All DEBFIS AND BROOM 12-0 2 OUP-11All CEA HALL FLOORS WM C D000.5 RISC —EIG IEAVING JOB FREE OF ­RM (1)PROPOS.VERRON WRELES-S GPS UNITS MOUNIED TO EGGED DUST DEBRIS PRIOR TO PROJECT CORPLETEAI..ATAT PUT FORM PAIS .ON I PROP WEAT EN CANOPY Hv3D� IXISTNG EOUPUEM AND WTFAM¢TO BE RwOvm WHICH ME ! PROPOS.1-0 WIDE SWNG CA1E�AJ PROPOS.CHPIN JINN FENCING WTN PRNACY SUTS REG ED M BE NELOCATFD OR NETUN.BY THE OWNER 5 THE PROPOS.CMOPT POST TTP FOR(6) PROPEITY OF Tiff CONTRACTOR AND Pwwm FROM THE PROMISES C PROPOS.VER ON WREIESS TELCO CONDUT TRENCHED FROM (B)PFOPOSm VERIZON WREL¢S HELLCAL PRES(S20 Y9AW �°1LL14 RIONGENERAL ONLY M ME NOT sPaN CAED S,1O DONIN IEUCH5GT 0 CABINET TO O EAISTNG _/CONCRETE PIENS WITH COMNUOMIS CONCRETE MLLE CAP BITEMO.TO SHPNFALL ITEMS WHI[H VAY PEWNE REMOVAL SUCH ITEMS SH.EL BE REMOVED RELOCATED.AND/ON RNNGTAMEG AS RmUIRED FOR RISTALIATON OF NEW WORK P51 AUS.FOR ON-SITE ENTRAIINED MOM M %MR EMRAM. MINMUM CONCRETE OARS M . ro sz 1 ENLARGED -0 EOUIPMENT PLAN O� B~1' 2 NORni All R-14 ANIPIH NADJWDRx J/B"I (12)PROPOS.—G.WREIESS 7/II,A TENTS CABLES POU,E°WITHIN F]LIST.CONCFA _POLE -•1/2'} -�`-2'-a I/2'-�,- -�'-'P-S 1/2 PROPOSED TREES MOUND BACK AND SIDES OF PROPOSED vEMZON WRELESS -' COMPOUNsD%TCIHEIII NH TREES MOUND ATkT COMPOUND REFER TO SNE PLM L - CO H DETAIL 2/5P-w PROPDS.1]-O-HIGH CHAIN IJNK PENCING WITH PFU M SLATS BAR I 9 (G.NOPYPoSED VERRON WREIES5 6P5 UNITS MOUNTED M PROPOSED WEATIw W PROPOSED MIZON W ODUESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND OKW DIESEL b GO lmE sEf ATOP va0P05. P.Idtl-YEVY y N ELEVATED MLVM2mS5TEEL PUTFORN PROPOSED TREES NOEYTHND AIOU1I CK AND SHINES OF PflOPoS.VERRON R- � e TO SIIESPUN 1/sy-1 OHO MD DETML TBEES 2/sM-100.ppND ATki COMPOUND REFER BATTERY GANNETT SPECIFICATIONS N 3 z O WNGM WTHLLTT EODAUIIPm¢-2636 UBS 628 W IBS ' C ETI T fwCEO EQUIPMENT MU TO REMUN /OF SHELVES 6 ao IXSTING TREE MOUND EOSTNGkAUPOUND TO P � XBtS EHOtII SIDE ° CTNCOEDM verizon� /1BATTERY CABINET DETAILS 'ORIENT PONT 2' o it 1tt 40200 MAN ROAD I I I \ OST.NY T1957 I I- I L•—•—( —•— —•— —•—•— — — - I I I I I I I • � ��� U., , EAST ELEVATION, U LJ L -�5- _ ENARGED EQUPABTf RAN CTING OS.FENCURG r B DA. MA%]I L AW NO 0 BE�RONCEO PIESS WITH CO5NELLCALHPNCRETEpPRE ° CI.CIUG Il CPP CRETE PIENS WIM COM NUOUs CONCRETE d Ei AS�iy , EBpxT ELFv JDE_ELEL• 13E40.-EIEY PAWW r,`�i\ BEAST ELEVATION " 2-B 5-1 X9712 ERODE CABINET DETAILS A-100.®0 �/_ SCAT-E 3 I-0" ~� STALE= 1 1-0" EH No- SOF /2"= . vhb Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis Zoning and Land Use of the Site and Surrounding Area and Planning Considerations According to the Town of Southold Zoning Map(Section 3 of 4),the subject property '-is situated-within the Marine II(MII)zoning district(see Figure 4,Zoning Map). Section 280-55.A of the Code of the Town of Southold(hereinafter,the"Town Code") indicates that the MII zoning district permits,but is not limited to,one-family detached dwellings;boat docks,slips,piers or wharves;beach clubs,yacht clubs or boat clubs;boatyards for building,storing,repairing,renting,selling or servicing boats;mariculture or aquaculture operations or research and development;boat and marine engine repair and sales and display;yacht brokers or marine insurance brokers;buildings,structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts,park and fire districts;and retail sale or rental of fishing,diving or bathing supplies and equipment. The proposed facility is permitted within the MII zoning district with site plan approval,an area variance and a building permit. The land uses in the surrounding area,as depicted in.Figure 5,generally comport with the surrounding zoning districts. The zoning and land uses of the surrounding area(i.e.,within approximately one-quarter mile)are as follows: North: The land uses and zoning immediately north of the subject property are single-family residential properties within the Residential Low Density t (R-40)zoning district. East: To the east of the subject property are properties associated with Plum Island' Animal Disease Center and the Cross Sound Ferry Terminal,with single- family residential uses(northeast)and the Orient Point County Park beyond. The Plum Island and Cross Sound Ferry properties are within the MII zoning district and the single-family residential uses and Orient Point County Park are within the Residential Low Density(R-80)zoning district.- 7 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis 000 1 A---10/�3 `��►hb South: South of the subject property are the waters associated with Gardner's Bay. West: West of the subject site is Orient Beach State Park(including Long Beach) with single-family residential uses beyond. The beach is within the Residential Low Density D(R-400)zoning district and the residential uses beyond are situated within the Residential Low Density C(R-200),R-80 and R-40 zoning districts. Photographs are provided in Appendix A to depict the character of the surrounding community. The proposed facility is located within an area in which Verizon Wireless has an existing service deficiency gap,according to information provided by Verizon Wireless'Radio Frequency(RF)Engineer.Moreover,correspondence from the Suffolk County Police Department indicates that"there is an urgent need for a new Verizon Wireless communications facility to provide reliable wireless service" (see correspondence in Appendix B). The Suffolk County Police Department is in support of the proposed action,as the Police Department utilizes Verizon Wireless's service for police and public safety communications in the Town of Southold.Presently the subject site contains an existing AT&T wireless communications facility,and the proposed action seeks to collocate at that facility,in an effort to minimize potential visual and environmental impacts upon the surrounding area.From a planning perspective,and given the area in which Verizon Wireless must locate its facility in order to address the existing service deficiency gap,extending the existing concealment structure is appropriate,as it utilizes an existing wireless communications structure on a commercial property in a mixed use area,and eliminates the need to install a new tall structure(e.g.,monopole,lattice tower,etc.) to accommodate the proposed facility. 8 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis ti t J Source Town of Southold Zoning Map, Section 3 of 4(Adopted November 30,2004) AC Agricultural Conservation(2 acre) HD Hamlet Density Residential B General Business Existing Facility Location RAG Residential Low Dens tty(1 acre) AHD Affordable Housing District MI Marine l R-80 Residential Low Density(2 acre) RR Resort Resdential Mll Manne II R-120 Residential Low Density 3 acre RO Residential Office Subject Property Llo Light Industrial Park R-200 Residential Low Density 5 acre HB Hamlet Business LI Light Industrial R-400 Residential Low Density(10 acre) LB Limited Business Orient Point 2 N Zoning Map Figure 4 Verizon Wireless 40200 Main Road Feet 0 2,800 5,600 Orient, New York 11957 y 1� •w,Rd. � � t4.Sea flt ���` Orient point County park A plum'Isl+'nd L .- � its •� + t Long Island � ♦ meq, a♦` ..Laths' 'r � �', f i a.♦ / -- j ..1 r`+ nLaa �'t'� • nfj it 4 LOP 41 •4 Ne i7v 1 300 •11 jb!T[0"n n aJJIU hV.PE aWIND/ • ••- vhb Article XVII of the Town Code regulates telecommunications facilities and structures within the Town of Southold. Pursuant to guidance from the Town,the proposed facility will require a building permit and site plan approval,as well as an area variance for the proposed equipment compound,per§280-56. Per the Bulk Schedule for Business,Office and Industrial Districts,the MII zoning district requires a 25-foot side yard setback,where a 7-foot,3-inch side yard setback is proposed herein. However,the proposed compound's setback and design would be consistent with the existing AT&T equipment compound at the subject property. The requested area variance would allow the proposed equipment compound to be located adjacent to the existing AT&T compound,ensuring a more seamless extension of the existing facility,as well as mitigation for potential visual impacts.The public hearing for site plan approval was held on September 12,2016,with the Planning Board closing the hearing and reserving decision until a later date,pending the Zoning Board of Appeals decision on the area variance application.As such,presented herein is an analysis of the required area variance for the proposed facility. New York State Town Law§267-a sets forth procedures for Boards of Appeals,as well as filing requirements for applicants with respect to area variances. In addition, New York State Town Law§267-b.3(b)sets forth criteria to be taken into consideration when making its determination.As the Town of Southold does not include specific standards for area variances in the Town Code,an analysis of the proposed action's consistency with the criteria in§267-b.3(b) of the New York State Town Law is provided below. 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. As previously indicated,the proposed action involves the installation of a 20±-foot extension to the existing 69±-foot agl AT&T concealment pole, which would allow Verizon Wireless to provide reliable service to its users and to the Suffolk County Police Department,as there is a lack of coverage in the Orient area.Despite the proposed 7-foot,3-inch side yard setback,where a setback of 25-feet is required,the proposed facility and operation thereof would be contained entirely within the confines of the subject property and would not impact the use of nearby properties or the on-site uses.Moreover, the side yard setback of 7 feet,1 inches has already been established by the existing AT&T equipment compound on-site,and the Verizon Wireless equipment compound will essentially be an extension of the existing AT&T compound area.The proposed Verizon Wireless equipment would be close to the Orient Beach State Park access roadway,but would not be adjacent to areas where beach users would congregate. In addition,as the equipment compound would be concealed by fencing and landscaping,the visual 11 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis �'�rhb impacts would be minimal. The placement of the proposed facility upon and adjacent to an existing wireless communications facility,on a commercially- zoned and developed property within a mixed-use area is appropriate,given the limited siting opportunities within the existing Verizon Wireless service deficiency gap area.Further,the distance to the residential dwellings on Main Road is maximized in the proposed location. Finally,although there would be a slight increase in height to the existing concealment pole,the proposed facility would be in character with,and visually similar to the existing AT&T facility,thereby not visually impacting the surrounding uses (as demonstrated in the photographic simulations in Appendix C).As such, it is anticipated that the granting of the requested area variance would not result in a significant adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. Pursuant to information from Verizon Wireless,there are no other suitable, existing structures in the surrounding area at which Verizon Wireless can locate its facility and remedy the existing service deficiency gap. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that the subject property is the least intrusive means to remedy the service deficiency gap.Furthermore,the proposed compound's setback and design would be consistent with the existing AT&T equipment compound at the subject property. The requested area variance would allow the proposed equipment compound to be located adjacent to the existing compound,ensuring a more seamless extension of the existing facility,as well as mitigation for potential visual impacts.Moreover,the placement of the proposed facility on the overall subject property is such that it would not interfere with on-site restaurant and marina operations,and the distance to residential uses to the north is maximized.As such,the benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method other than an area variance. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial The proposed action requests a 17.75-foot relaxation of the side yard standard,as compared to a 25-foot minimum setback requirement. However,this variance would not be substantial in practice,given that the side yard for the existing AT&T equipment compound has already been established as 7 feet, 1-inches from the western property line,which was previously granted by the ZBA in 2012. In essence,there would be no further reduction of the existing side yard.It is respectfully submitted that, despite the need for a side yard variance,the placement of the proposed equipment compound in the southwest portion of the overall subject property,adjacent to the existing AT&T facility,is the most appropriate 12 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis `Mib location,as it would fit seamlessly with the existing AT&T facility and it would not interfere with on-site restaurant and marina operations. 4. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed facility would be unoccupied and would not result in excessive traffic or congregation of people;nor would it result in disturbance to nearby residential uses by reason of lights or vibration.As previously indicated,the proposed facility would be situated upon previously-disturbed ground,adjacent to an existing AT&T equipment compound,and would result in the disturbance of a minimal amount of land contained entirely within the boundaries of the subject property.Additionally,all work would be done in accordance with wetlands permits issued for the proposed action., Moreover,the proposed facility has been designed to match the existing AT&T facility,such that potential visual impacts have been mitigated to the maximum extent practicable,including proposed fencing and landscaping. As such,the proposed facility would not have a significant adverse impact upon the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created,which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the board of appeals,but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance Pursuant to information from Verizon Wireless'RF Engineer,the proposed facility location was selected based the existing service deficiency gap,as well as the presence of an existing facility upon which collocation would be possible.A major objective of the proposed action is to provide reliable wireless communications service in an area in which Verizon Wireless is currently experiencing a service deficiency gap,while also providing mitigating measures to the extent practicable in order to reduce the potential for visual impacts to the surrounding area. The requested variance would allow for the placement of the proposed facility such that it would be seamless with the existing AT&T facility and would not interfere with on-site restaurant and marina operations.The requested area variance would allow Verizon Wireless to locate its equipment immediately adjacent to the existing AT&T equipment,where the side yard setback has already been established as 7 feet, 1-inches. It is respectfully submitted that any alternative layout would be less desirable than the proposed plan with respect to potential visual,community character,and on-site impacts. The initial AT&T installation was pe.m.ted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC)under Tidal Wetlands Permit No.1-4738-00898100018 dated December 16,2011 and modified on April 16,2012 and September 12,2012 Venzon Wireless secured a Tidal Wetlands Permit for the proposed facility modification on August 25,2016(Tidal Wetlands Permit No.1-4738-00898/00022). 13 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis 0010 `�vhb In addition to the area variance criteria discussed above,it should be noted that,pursuant to the Laws of New York State,Verizon Wireless is considered a"public utility." Pursuant to the"public utility"standard,Verizon Wireless need only establish that there is a public ` necessity for the proposed installation.Thus,a Petition in Support of the Application by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d1bla Verizon Wireless for Variance Relief to Construct, Operate and Maintain a Public Utility Wireless Communications Facility(hereinafter referred to as the "Petition"),which was submitted to the ZBA by Amato Law Group,PLLC,under separate cover,presents an analysis with regard to the"public utility" standard.Specifically,Verizon Wireless needed only establish that: (i)there are gaps in service;(ii)the location of the proposed facility will remedy those gaps;and(iii)the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community.Such analysis,which was based upon the RF Report prepared by C Squared Systems,LLC,concludes that Verizon Wireless does,in fact,have a gap in service and that the proposed facility would remedy such a gap in service.Additionally,as with this Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analysis,the Petition concludes that the proposed facility would have minimal intrusion on the surrounding community.Thus,the"public utility"standard is satisfied for the proposed facility. 14 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis 4 X*0 lot vhb Environmental Considerations As the proposed facility would be unmanned after construction,there would be minimal impact on the environmental conditions in the area.The facility would not generate sewage or solid waste and would not need to be supplied with potable water.As the facility would be monitored remotely,the amount of traffic generated by the proposed project would be negligible-approximately one trip per month by a technician to check the equipment. Additionally,the equipment installed on the site would use minimal electricity. The proposed communications facility includes the construction of a 13-foot,10-inch by 32-foot equipment compound. The area upon which the new equipment compound would be located is a previously-disturbed gravel parking area that is partially covered with overgrown,weedy vegetation.Moreover,utility conduits would be routed underground throughout previously paved land at the subject property,such that no additional overhead wires would be installed. Overall,the proposed construction would require the disturbance of approximately 0.0761 acre(1.6%)of the overall 4.7±-acre property. As such,the installation requires minimal ground disturbance of previously-disturbed land. Additionally,expansion of the existing facility would not significantly increase impervious surface area,as the proposed equipment would be situated upon an elevated equipment platform, and would result in an increase in impervious area of approximately 0.0006±acre. Therefore,there would be no significant adverse impacts to soils or topography,area drainage,or regional ecology. As previously indicated,there are NYSDEC regulated tidal wetlands within 300 feet of the'proposed facility location,and Verizon Wireless has secured a tidal wetlands permit from NYSDEC to ensure that there would be no adverse impacts to wetlands resources.' As there would be no sewage generation or water use,and as all work would done in accordance with NYSDEC wetlands permit issued,there would be no significant adverse impacts to surface waters or groundwater quantity or quality or wetland resources. Overall, the proposed wireless communications facility has been designed such that, to the maximum extent practicable,it is in compliance with the criteria associated with the granting of an area(side yard setback)variance. 15 Zoning,Land Use and Environmental Analysis 7OQ3 q'Vhb Visual Impact Analysis Photographic Simulations In October 2016,APT Engineering prepared photographic simulations of the proposed wireless communications facility. APT Engineering was provided with photographs and simulations,prepared by others in November 2011 for the original AT&T facility.APT revisited the 12 photo locations analyzed in 2011 for the existing communications facility and selected additional locations to represent the approximate limits of visibility.2 Photographs taken presented reference points(using the subject concealment pole itself)for calculation of the placement of the proposed facility,as seen'from each view point,where visible. Twenty-two(22)viewpoints proximate to the existing facility location were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact for the completed project., Photographic simulations of the proposed facility were prepared from fifteen(15) representative locations from which the proposed communications facility would be visible. In addition,seven(7)viewpoints depict locations from which the proposed facility would not be visible. APT Engineering's Photo Log depicting the view point locations is included as Figure 6.,� The photographic simulations of the proposed facility are contained within Appendix C of this report. s It must be noted that although nota subject of this application,the proposed extension to the existing pole will not open up any new areas of visibility from those viewpoints taken in 2011. 16 Visual Impact Analysis LCL�nL- d \c` SourM upAvtWv ad ... - L� 0 P • nay ON ky d o oop • 1 �1 K LN1te Block N."dd arcs Snxn •r r QYxRe .e'er � ! ! ! 14�.f2GRK'�4Y84.3�$. t�§•J.:�7de.'N�"fb'hZ2 -Uti,K�4i t•�L'Til�T7Y:�'r�1�LTtT�.'i • • .� kIIN3 vhb Visual Impact Analysis The results of the visual impact analysis are summarized below,with existing conditions photographs and photographic simulations included in Appendix C. View Point 1—from State Parkway,approximately 1.57 miles southwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 1 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with deciduous trees and vegetation.Due to the distance from the proposed facility,as well as the presence of intervening vegetation,the existing facility was not visible and the proposed pole extension would not be visible from this location. Therefore,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 2—from State Parkway,approximately 1.36 miles southwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 2 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with deciduous trees and vegetation,as well as Gardiner's Bay to the east and the existing concealment pole beyond.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Additionally,from this vantage point the height increase of the existing pole would not be readily discernible.Moreover,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 3—from State Parkway,approximately 0.85-mile southwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 3 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with deciduous trees and vegetation,as well as Gardiner's Bay to the east and the existing concealment pole beyond.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location.However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,thereby helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be visually consistent and in character with the existing concealment pole(the height increase would not likely be readily discernible upon completion),and the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 4—from State Parkway,approximately 0.52-mile southwest of the existing concealment pole location.The view point 4 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with vegetation, rocks,wetlands,and Gardiner's Bay to the east.The existing concealment pole is visible beyond the deciduous trees in the area and the photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate 18 Visual Impact Analysis Off ! 'vhbb potential visual impacts from this vantage point.Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be in character with the existing concealment pole.It is anticipated that the height increase would not likely be discernable to the casual observer.In addition,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 5—from State Parkway,approximately 0.26-mile southwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 6 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with vegetation,and buildings beyond. From this location,the existing pole is visible and the photographic simulation indicates the proposed pole extension would be visible. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts from this vantage point.Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be visually consistent with the existing concealment pole,and the height increase would not likely be discernable to the casual observer.In addition, the proposed equipment compound would not be visible.As such,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 6—from State Parkway,approximately 0.12-mile southwest of the proposed facility location. The view point 6 existing conditions photograph depicts the roadway associated with Orient Beach State Park lined with vegetation, the existing pole,Gardiner's Bay to the east,and buildings beyond.The photographic simulation indicates the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helpmg to mitigate potential visual impacts.Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be visually consistent with the existing concealment pole.In addition,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 7—from the host property(subject site),approximately 145 feet east of the existing concealment pole location.The view point 7 existing conditions photograph depicts the view from the parking lot of the subject site.Visible are the existing pole and equipment compound,surrounding vegetation,gravel parking lot,, and parked cars.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location.However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts.The proposed equipment compound would appear to be an extension of the existing equipment compound area. In addition,evergreen trees would be planted on the north and west sides of the equipment compound to screen potential views from adjacent areas.Therefore,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. 19 Visual Impact Analysis do0 00 ` -vhb View Point 8—from Main Road at Orient Beach State Park,approximately 0.16- mile northwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 8 existing conditions photograph depicts the intersection of Main Road and the entrance to Orient Beach State Park. The existing restaurant structure at the subject site and structures on the Plum Island property,the existing concealment pole,lawn and landscaped vegetation,deciduous trees,and a flag pole are visible from this view point.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts,and the height increase of the existing pole is not significantly distinct.Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be visually consistent with the existing concealment pole and,the proposed facility would be no higher in the horizon than the existing flagpole.Further,the proposed equipment compound would blend in with existing compound and proposed vegetation and would not be visually prominent.As such,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 9—from Cedar Birch Road,approximately 0.20-mile west of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 9 existing conditions photograph depicts a grassy field and dense seasonal vegetation with the existing pole beyond.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts.Moreover,the slight height increase of the existing pole is not significantly distinguishable,and the proposed pole extension would be in character with the existing concealment pole.In addition,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 10—from Cedar Birch Road,approximately 0.19-mile southwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 10 existing conditions photograph depicts dense seasonal vegetation with the existing concealment pole beyond.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts.Moreover,the proposed pole extension would be in visually consistent with the existing concealment pole. Furthermore,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.Therefore,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 11—from the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Route 25, approximately 0.32-mile northwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 11 existing conditions photograph depicts a paved intersection lined with trees and dense vegetation on residential lots,as well as utility poles,overhead wires and light poles in the surrounding area. Due to the presence of intervening 20 Visual Impact Analysis 4-00.0 ` Vhb vegetation,the existing facility is not visible and the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Therefore,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 12—from the intersection of Ryder Farm Lane and Uhl Lane, approximately 0.46-mile northwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 12 existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway lined with dense vegetation. Due to the presence of intervening vegetation,the existing concealment pole is not visible and,therefore,the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Thus,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 13—from the intersection of Uhl Lane and Three Waters Lane, approximately 0.36-mile northwest of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 13 existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway lined with trees and other dense vegetation on residential lots.Due to the presence of intervening vegetation,the existing concealment pole is not visible and,therefore,the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Thus,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 14—from Park Lane near the intersection with Plum Island Lane, approximately 0.24-mile northwest of the proposed facility location. The view point 14 existing conditions photograph depicts dense deciduous trees and other vegetation on a residential lot.Due to the presence of intervening vegetation,the existing concealment pole is not visible and,therefore,the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Thus,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 15—from Lands End Lane adjacent to the beach parking area, approximately 0.54-mile north of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 15 existing conditions photograph depicts a paved roadway lined with dense vegetation.Due to the presence of intervening vegetation,the existing concealment pole is not visible and,therefore,the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Thus,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 16—from Latham Lane,approximately 0.31-mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 16 existing conditions photograph depicts a single-family home under construction,surrounding vegetation and residences beyond. Due to the presence of intervening vegetation, the existing concealment pole is not visible and,therefore,the proposed facility would not be visible from this location.Thus,a photographic simulation was not prepared. View Point 17—from Latham Lane,approximately 0.29-mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 17 existing conditions photograph depicts a single-family home,deciduous trees and surrounding landscape vegetation with the existing concealment pole beyond. The photographic simulation indicates that proposed pole extension would be visible from this 21 Visual Impact Analysis Vhb10 R3 location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts.Moreover,the extension would be visually consistent with the existing concealment pole.The proposed equipment compound would not be visible.As such,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 18—from Lands End Lane,approximately 0.22-mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 18 existing conditions photograph depicts utility poles,overhead wires,a flagpole,a lattice tower,seasonal vegetation and structures associated with the operations of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center,as well as the existing concealment pole beyond. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location.However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within,helping to mitigate potential visual impacts,and from this vantage point the slight height increase of the existing pole is not visually significant.Moreover,the proposed facility extension would still appear lower in the horizon that existing vertical elements. Additionally,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.Therefore,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 19—from the entrance to the Cross Sound Ferry,approximately 0.23- mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 19 existing conditions photograph depicts paved staging areas associated with the Cross Sound Ferry,the Ferry office building and the existing concealment pole beyond. The photographic simulation indicates the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location.However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts,and from this vantage point the slight height increase of the existing pole is not prominent.Moreover,the proposed facility extension would be visually in character with the existing concealment pole. Additionally,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 20—from the Cross Sound Ferry,approximately 0.22-mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 20 existing conditions photograph depicts the subject property and the shoreline on either side thereof,as viewed from the Cross Sound Ferry. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location. However,the proposed antennas would be concealed within and the height increase of the existing pole is not particularly discernible. The proposed equipment compound would appear to be an extension of the existing compound and would largely blend with vegetation beyond.Thus,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. 22 Visual Impact Analysis �•Of 4-ID h b View Point 21—from Gardiners Bay,approximately 0.95-mile northeast of the existing concealment pole location. The view point 21 the existing conditions photograph depicts the subject property and the shoreline on either side thereof,as viewed from Gardiner's Bay.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location,but the height increase would be imperceptible.Moreover,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.As such,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point 22—from Gardiners Bay,approximately 1.58-miles northeast of the proposed facility location. From view point 22,the existing conditions photograph depicts existing concealment pole and the shoreline on either side thereof,as viewed from Gardiner's Bay.The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed pole extension would be visible from this location,but the height increase would be imperceptible.Moreover,the proposed equipment compound would not be visible from this location.As such,the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. As the visual analysis indicates,the proposed wireless communications facility extension would be visible from a number of vantage points throughout the surrounding area. However,the height increase would be generally imperceptible from the surrounding area and there would not be a significant visual alteration in the established visual horizon.Moreover,the proposed ground-based fenced and landscaped equipment compound would appear to be an extension of the existing AT&T compound and would primarily be visible from the subject property and the immediate surrounding area only.Thus,the proposed facility has been sited and designed to minimize potential visual impacts. 23 Visual Impact Analysis vhb, Findings and Conclusions Based upon an inspection of the existing wireless communications facility location and surrounding areas,review of Town.zoning maps and aerial, photographs,evaluation of the characteristics of the proposed facility and examination of potential visual impacts using photographic simulations,the following findings and conclusions can be made: 1. The proposed communications facility consists of an extension of an existing concealment pole and installation of an equipment compound adjacent to existing ground-based equipment.As such,from a planning perspective,the proposed facility is appropriate,as it obviates the need to construct a new,tall facility to accommodate antennas(e.g.,monopole or lattice tower). 2. The proposed wireless communications facility would not have significant impacts on the environmental conditions of the site and surrounding,area,as the facility would be unmanned. As such,no sewage or solid waste would be generated. There would be no significant impact to soils or topography,as the overall disturbance would be minimal and would not result in a significant increase in impervious surface area. There would be no adverse impact to traffic conditions on the surrounding roadways,as the facility would be monitored remotely,and would require physical inspection by a technician approximately once a month. Finally,all work would be done in accordance with the NYSDEC wetlands permit issued for the proposed action. 3. The proposed facility has been designed to mitigate potential visual impacts to the maximum extent practicable,as demonstrated in the photographic simulations.The proposed antennas would be concealed within the pole and the ground-based equipment would be screened by green slatted privacy fencing and evergreen trees. Further,the.proposed pole extension and equipment compound would be visually consistent and in character with existing conditions of the AT&T facility,including setbacks to the side yard,appearing to be extensions of same. 24 Findings and Conclusions Fhb Based upon the analysis conducted herein,the installation of the proposed wireless communications facility would not result in substantial changes to the_ physical characteristics of the neighborhood,nor would it result in significant adverse impacts to neighborhood character,visual resources or other environmental conditions of the area. Additionally,the proposed installation would be consistent with the"public utility"area variance criteria,as well as the criteria set forth in§267-b.3(b)of the New York State Town Law,as it is the least intrusive means,to remedy the existing service deficiency gap within the subject area. The requested area variance would allow the proposed equipment compound to be located adjacent to the existing AT&T compound,ensuring a seamless extension of the existing facility and mitigation for potential visual and environmental impacts. Iii conclusion,,given that the proposed action is an extension of an existing communication facility,located in the area required to address the existing Verizon Wireless service deficiency gap,the proposed communications facility has been designed in a manner that would achieve the public and emergency services communications goals of the project while also minimizing any potential significant adverse impacts. P\2967518 Onent Pomt 2\ProlRecords\F1nalDocs\Onent Pomt 2 Planning Report final text door 25 Findings and Conclusions hb Appendix A "`vhb Photograph No. 1: Representative view of the northern and central portions (marina and restaurant) of the subject property, located at 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, facing north from the subject property. PI Photograph No.2: Representative view of the southern portion of the subject property, where the existing AT&T concealment pole and equipment compound is located, facing south. Also visible in this photograph is an on-site building associated with the marina use. Photograph No.3: View of the existing AT&T concealment pole and equipment compound, facing west-northwest from the subject property interior. 4 Photograph No.4: View of the location of the proposed Verizon Wireless equipment compound, facing south. 'vhb 1 Photograph No. 5: Representative view of the residences north of the subject property, facing west-northwest along Main Road. e xs j y � ti Photograph No.6: Representative view of the residences northeast of the subject property, facing north along Lands End Lane. hb I WA, W- r t T - tLy Photograph No.7: View of entrance of the Orient Point County Park, northeast of the subject property, facing north from Main Road. r. t Photograph No. 8: View of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, imiwdiately east of the subject property, facing southeast from Main Road. lib Photograph No.9: View of the entrance of the Orient Point Ferry, east of the subject property, facing southeast from Main Road. Photograph No. 10: View of Gardiner's Bay, immediately south of the subject property, facing south from the subject property interior. ''vhb Photograph No. 11: Representative view of the Orient Beach State Park, abutting the subject property to the west, facing west from the subject ro e i Photograph No. 12: Representative view of a residential use west of the subject property on Main Road (immediately west of Orient Beach State Park), facing southwest from Main Road. X1013 V�i'� �� hb Photograph No. 13: Representative view of the residences f northwest of the subject property (west of the residences on Plum Island Lane), facing west-northwest along Main Road. ihb Appendix B COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NEW YORK Cu POLICE DEPARTMENT TIMOTHY D. SINI POLICE COMMISSIONER December 2,2016 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Dear Zoning Board of Appeals Members: , The Suffolk County Police Department utilizes Verizon Wireless service for police and public safety communications in the Town of Southold. However, due to Verizon Wireless' lack of coverage in certain areas, including the Orient area,there is an urgent need for a new Verizon Wireless communication facility to provide reliable wireless service. We have been advised that Verizon Wireless filed an application with this Board for a proposed wireless facility to be located on the Orient by the Sea Marina and Restaurant property, at 40200 Main Road in Orient. The Suffolk County Police Department fully supports this application, and requests that the application be expedited, to the greatest extent possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, William D. Okula, Sgt. 136 Police Technology Bureau Suffolk Coun Police Department ACCREDITED LAVH ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Visit us online at:www.suffolkpd.org Crime Stoppers Confidential Tip Hotline. 1-800-220-TIPS (>0' ' Non-Emergencies Requiring Police Response-Dial., (631) 852-COPS �1 30 Yaphank Avenue, Yaphank, New York 11980—(631)852-6000 '�Ovhb Appendix C Visual Assessment & Photo = Simulations ORIENT POINT 2 40200 MAIN ROAD 12 ORIENT, NY 11957 YT W Prepared in October 2016 by: APT Engineering 3 Saddlebrook Drive Killingworth, CT 06419 Prepared for Verizon Wireless PT A - P ENGINEERING' VISUAL ASSESSMENT & PHOTO-SIMULATIONS At the request of Verizon Wireless, APT Engineering, P.0 ("APT") completed this visual assessment to evaluate a proposed extension to an existing wireless•telecommunications Facility at 40200 Main Road in Orient Point, Suffolk County, NY("host property"). Project Setting The host property is currently developed with a waterfront restaurant and marina. The surrounding land use is a mix of commercial and residential development. r The proposed installation would include a 20-foot extension to an existing 69-foot tall monopole that has been designed and constructed to conceal antennas, cables and appurtenances within the structure. The proposed extension would match the existing design configuration so that no antennas or other equipment would,be visible on the exterior of the pole. Methodology On October 12, 2016, APT personnel conducted a field reconnaissance to photo-document existing conditions and evaluate the proposed extension of the existing Facility. Weather conditions were favorable for the in-field activities, with low humidity mostly sunny skies, resulting in several miles of visibility. The geographic coordinates of the camera's position at each photo location were logged via GPS. Photographs were taken with a Canon EOS 6D digital camera body and Canon EF 24 to 105 millimeter ("mm") zoom lens, ,with the lens set to 50 mm to present a consistent field of view. APT was provided with photographs and simulations prepared by others in November 2011, prior to construction of the Facility. The 12 photo locations presented in the 2011 report were revisited during the October 2016 reconnaissance to present representative photographs of existing conditions and prepare photo-simulations of the proposed extension for comparison. Additional photo locations were selected for this analysis to represent the approximate limits of visibility. Three-dimensional computer models were developed of the proposed installation from AutoCAD information. Photographic simulations were then generated to portray scaled renderings of the proposed Facility from representative,locations where it would be visible. Using field data, site plan information and image editing software, the proposed Facility was scaled to the correct location and height, relative to the existing building and surrounding area. A photolog map and copies of the existing conditions and photo-simulations are attached. The photo-simulations are static in nature and do not necessarily fairly characterize the prevailing views from all locations within a given area. The simulations provide a representation of the proposed Facility under similar settings as those encountered during the field reconnaissance. Views of the Facility can change substantially throughout the seasons as well as the time of day, and are dependent on weather and other atmospheric conditions including but not necessarily limited to haze, fog, and clouds; the location, angle and intensity of the sun; light conditions, and the specific viewer location. Page.1 of 2 October 2016 Conclusions The existing Facility includes a concealed monopole that houses internally-mounted panel antennas and appurtenances, resulting in as slim a visual profile as possible. The proposed 20-foot extension would complement this design and appearance Based on the field reconnaissance and photo-simulations, it is our opinion that the proposed extension would not substantially alter the existing views of the Facility nor expand views beyond where the pole can be seen today Report prepared by: APT Engineering Michael Libertine Vice President, Director of Siting & Permitting Page 2 of 2 October 2016 ATTACHMENTS Long Island c� Sound QO � O`e undview Rd .._____..✓o a°c S° N$ey c L Qo c 00 •� Orient Point-Ptd • 1340 11 Gardiners sl Rd Bay Old Ra Pd CJ a Utdo Block Island �✓ Sound Long BaaCh • Bay v,00. , �,ge ' AY 1 1 O R , �'3 ���.� fir. S•�irY: :1 '••� yM;I�r ��SMF ,�, ^� S,t�'.�S'r x•, �:a2y 3 r`- _ 4A , i � Zelow tiW I`a o l d L: ci f... W-ANY fIry ' • +L�', Nl�.al.'�' "3 by•t1�1 . � .�i• • b y t - a s. y, DOCUMENTATION LOCATION I ORIENTATION I DISTANCETO SITE 2 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-1.36 MILES r E G tzi.O verizon--' v Y Jv- a 00 SIMULATION y" r LOCATION I ORIENTATION l DISTANCETO SITE 2 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-1.36 MILES *APT verizon ENGINEEIUNG A., �'S°y� 'Fit �. At ^� • � !� a`�� at 9a i•- I • 1 • • 4 IF � �Mrd e' `r xx � � �� •t ° •: "-�` 'x:= � �� � r4 1..w. � `�" � -v��SlC k .• r .:•. � ��r�..�D.. 'i�7�.,;����P�`,i{ ..N 'F�,y a I(,,. • .r Y,. - r - ��1��,/_ �,� w f� r � • '�,,� �, . } r x .� � -.� S _.,.,.r� r .rte""- rrc_ `e�_ �_,�: , `s � �Y', � � �.0 _ ;yx • � • • •• • � • • � • +emir O SIMULATION �lj LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 4 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-0.52 MILE �NG NEPERING verizon R 4 4 ' al ALA WL DOCUMENTA7IO1. 1 LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETO SITE 5 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-0.26 MILE k^p' verizon ENGINEF.ftiN(; - �* •.�-fir _ '. .'.fi �'�`�-�,. r`1 -k€ •w 'Y1j 4i .I - - b SIMULATION LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 5 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-0.26 MILE G NPEERING verizon s i ~�.�f';l TAT• � ,,,�,,1 .` DOCUMENTAT10- LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETOSITE 6 STATE PARKWAY NORTHEAST +/-0.12MILE -1t. pLu-,,. • i - � y SIMULATION. f� DOCUMENTATION � LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE HOST PROPERTY WEST +/-145 FEET a� ENG NVEERING verizonl s. 4' 7. F SIMULATION I LOCATION I ORIENTATION I DISTANCETO SITE 7 HOST PROPERTY WEST +/-145 FEET INE APERINGT verizon ENG i .r ' 4 F rA: i4�-. `� � ]B'1..•, y�;ti:.ern ka i inunnn, nunnFnnu.n , 1f1• • • i JK^ 6 1 �l � ' r ��}. r •fit. �4� � ._. ""I,. ,IIIIfltlllur 111111/1 1111 urn. ...... MGM I Lei •• • • • r a� • � • .•^i _ r , •� ". y poi y ._ •_ _ �� � 1`4.� 1'.•�.�/����f •��• ;s' � �'� it 't r•�� ` "�` �, •�+- �,,." y,�1♦^y qti';, `ref- r /� .r •• . Y f" ►, ( i r i t � .16 41 AA 40 to - •N'/a,� - ,y y,l�x Yt Y lk'lF yRpm 'a r ELa. ;I WIR�rin �r No 77 • , gig 00,I k tt► t. ..� t � ���i+ �' '1t .� ' Y i � t� � •,f 'u.• � ,mow%•: t �.a �,� ''N►. ?� � .�, ;���';" !; }"•..�5 S}rk�' C� •�6,1�•F T !! �r tN••y j ��•' �.1.. •'i gyp_ �. :1I S tv J,S ,•�� '�'L ,• lip a VISIBLE • PHOTONOT OM THIS LOCATI DOCUMENTATION INTERSECTIONOF •ER FARM LANE AND ROUTE 2S SOUTHEAST1 tw• 4. • -, is ,.\ �Y �' •.. �� ;; t. .K �,. s: ' *'�.r'�si�� `� •� �f� ,. � .,.. `77TH 45 Y" a. • t W, 1 t.�a j•��. t`Syiv s.�A Z , v�` � , • ��'•••�+- '.r / �Q j~ r t-.•� 40 At �;, ' w �- • e"` * r - g" _•ter' ( � .°`` jr r ,,� ,rY.-� � . 'k-,�a' IT NA Ae AM lim �. � 1K rY � '�. SCS _ . � r ♦�Yii �'•r ��.i T. r 1.�� �� •?�. � wt•�. a `w i• t' to ;� :��N ' � � ' ' - �,,' < •��+r • ,z :'� Q � .� ��7 .�• _� � Sera�`h. M'� - ,! • .. . ti• �� �r • e���.,'• �T *�. -' z� 1, - c.. - _ —�-'�•� t4f� �� � "�• rye., �cy' - Ivy`' �i• � -_ •i -_ � - �,,. .yr... ��,;j�f;?� Jd W _ 1 • } s `cam i�� ! s- ► . �+•!i S 3 ,�_-j_ )f. 3 . CM ,�'��'�` _" ��" �_ 4' " _- ' � ���- -r` sr-�' 1., r-.- �"' XYZ fi' .�' , �• - .�p� � w,_.. fly .♦ _ - Y' �• -,_••' _ ' Y -_ - � -'•moi iIL4. 40 We Amf Me M, 1 � 1 • K 7 k L' V' V NOT VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION DOCUMENTATION PHOTO LOCATION I ORIENTATION I DISTANCETO SITE 15 ADJACENT TO THE BEACH PARKING AREA AT THE END OF LANDS END LANE SOUTH +/-O.S4 MILE E G NVE T verizon,' I ` r•- r SY J a� �F d J Y yi\ J NOT VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION we DOCUMENTATION LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 16 LATHAM LANE SOUTHWEST +/-0.31 MILE PT E G N.,NC verizon ` w rt . Ok F iL 4 Al V I . • 1 r R4 �y 36 s a W DOCUMENTATION LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETO SITE 18 LANDS END LANE SOUTHWEST +/-0.22 MILE �NkHRING verizon ' } r s AL -44m, dmim- V SIMULATION LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETO SITE 18 LANDS END LANE SOUTHWEST +/-0.22 MILE ENG NVEERING verizoW k 1 rt - _ti Y z f V DOCUMENTATION LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETO SITE 19 ENTRACE TO THE CROSS SOUND FERRY SOUTHWEST +/-0.23 MILE r ENGINEERING verizon �1 , 44 d SIMULATION PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 19 ENTRACE TO THE CROSS SOUND FERRY SOUTHWEST +/-0.23 MILE ANG NPEER NG verizon z s 1 - a db 1 3� DOCUMENTATION W PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETO SITE 20 CROSS SOUND FERRY SOUTHWEST +/-0.22 MILE r �A P T verizon ' ENGINEERING I .s SIMULATION PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION I DISTANCETO SITE 20 CROSS SOUND FERRY SOUTHWEST +/-0.22 MILE �A P TRING verizon ENGINEE y1� �k f I 71 •-RCD DOCUMENTATION \� LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETOSITE 21 GARDINERS BAY WEST +/-0.95 MILE \A'F verizon' T �. - Y - 40k N T _ .-.,-+'�1ii' _..�.a s 'tea•. - - r. SIMULATION PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 21 GARDINERS BAY WEST +/-0.95 MILE ENG 1- N..... verizonl y f r - �-�"`x�`�=-nom�--�• -_ _ _ �_�•.-_._ �.,,�-.��-�t+ -" -.... �+...- _ a ... . ... . .. Aw DOCUMENTATION PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCETOSITE 22 GARDINERS BAY SOUTHWEST +/-1.58 MILES ENC N,.,NG verizon - p► _r ,T _. �� .A..�.ry�.�1 �."K��. N_-.-...� -�iL -•1T.'��.. a-i^` __ .,,yrs. •-�_ g S �./��-'�• ..�-n _„- _ - -war .. "� '•w�-w.�dy�$ _ ..n. ..� r���, . x'Sm4Z'�`.�+A'�' - � _ w"3"'uti` �'-':.s.� v+ w `.� < �w.r•' ,n.r.. "_>`" i.. _ _tea- r3M+»r' +t e* Y � I �' w —r,!.�. ,rte•„—,�. :' wy .'w-r�€r �..v�t = SIMULATION PHOTO LOCATION ORIENTATION DISTANCE TO SITE 22 GARDINERS BAY SOUTHWEST +/-1.S8 MILES E G NPEERWp verizon �ihb w1oa3 Appendix D ° 1 I u .ii s I � ©p400 �nthb I Erin Duffy Echevarria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project Manager I . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . Ms.Echevarria is a Project Ms.Echevarria's responsibilities involve the coordination of project activities associated with public utility wireless communications facilities,including attendance at hearings, Manager with VHB.Ms. preparation of Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analyses and preparation of State Echevarria's primary tasks Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)documentation.In addition,Ms.Echevarria's duties also include the involve providing SEORA and ! preparation of various environmental and planning documents,including,but not NEPA support to the public ! limited to,environmental assessment forms(EAFs),zoning studies,visual studies, wetlands applications and environmental impact statements(EISs). utilities industry. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analyses and Neighborhood Character Studies for Public Utility Wireless Communications Providers,Various Sites,NY Preparation of Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analyses and neighborhood character studies for public utility wireless communications facilities in the Towns of I Riverhead,Hempstead,Islip,Babylon,North Hempstead,Huntington,Brookhaven and Southold,as well as in the Villages of Great Neck,Freeport,Patchogue,Lake Grove,The I Branch,East Hampton,Westhampton Beach,Head of the Harbor,Mineola and the City of Long Beach. In addition,Ms.Echevarria provides expert environmental and planning testimony to various Town and Village Boards,Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeal with respect to planning,zoning and environmental matters. Representative projects include: I i AT&T concealment pole on a former duck farm property,hamlet of Moriches, Town of Brookhaven,NY • SiteTech Wireless concealment pole at a municipal solid waste facility,hamlet i of Kings Park,Town of Smithtown,NY • SiteTech Wireless concealment pole at a highway department property,hamlet of Nesconset,Town of Smithtown,NY _! • Suffolk Wireless flagpole monopole at a fire department property,hamlet of Commack,Town of Huntington,NY • Verizon Wireless stealth rooftop installation on a hotel,hamlet of Plainview, Town of Oyster Bay,NY 100 Motor Parkway Suite 135 Engineers I Scientists I Planners I Designers Hauppauge,New York 11788 P 631.787 3400 F 631.813.2545 ' #1613 I I • Verizon Wireless stealth monopole on a Jewish Center property,hamlet of East Northport,Town of Huntington,NY • Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile stealth rooftop installation on an office building,Incorporated Village of the Branch,NY • Verizon Wireless stealth installation in a church steeple,hamlet of East Norwich,Town of Oyster Bay,NY • Multi-carrier flagpole monopole at Venetian Shores Park,hamlet of Lindenhurst,Town of Babylon,NY • Flagpole monopole on a Village Hall property,Incorporated Village of Head of the Harbor • Verizon Wireless monopole relocation on an industrial property,hamlet of New Hyde Park,Town of North Hempstead NEPA Reports,Various Sites,NY Historic research,coordination with involved agencies(i.e.,Indian Tribes,local municipalities,etc.),preparation of State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)and Tower 1 Construction Notification System(TCNS)documentation and preparation NEPA reports for proposed public utility wireless communications providers,including Verizon Wireless,Suffolk Towers,T-Mobile and AT&T(Cingular Wireless),throughout Long Island and in the five boroughs of New York City. Environmental Assessment Forms,Various Locations,NY EAFs for projects including residential subdivisions,commercial and residential developments,and public utility communications facilities,and hospitals throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties and the five boroughs of New York City. NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Permit Applications,Various Sites,NY Preparation of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC) Freshwater Wetlands Permit Applications for properties within the Town of — Huntington,Village of East Hampton,and the Village of Southampton. I NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit Applications,Various Sites,NY Preparation of NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit Applications within the Towns of Hempstead,Babylon,Brookhaven and Shelter Island. Residential Subdivision,Southampton,NY Preparation of Expanded EAF and NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands permit application — for a residential subdivision in the Incorporated Village of Southampton. i 1W%f11b . Residential Redevelopment,Sag Harbor,NY Participated in the preparation of an Expanded EAF for the redevelopment of the former Bulova Watch Factory to a residential use in the Incorporated Village of Sag Harbor. Commercial Redevelopment,Brookhaven,NY Preparation of the Expanded EAF for the redevelopment of a commercial property to accommodate a Lowe's Home Store in the hamlet of East Patchogue. Residential Development,Patchogue,NY Participated in the preparation of an Expanded EAF for the'Copper Beech'residential townhouse community in the Incorporated Village of Patchogue. Commercial Redevelopment,East Hills,NY Participation in the preparation of the Expanded EAF for redevelopment of an 18.07- acre,former industrial property with commercial office space. Hospital Research Facility,Mineola,New York Participated in the preparation of the Expanded EAF for the redevelopment of institutionally-and commercially developed lots with a Winthrop University Hospital Research Center. Mixed-Use Development,Oyster Bay,NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment,as well as participation in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)for a Planned Development District with a mix of residential units,commercial space,and recreational areas in the hamlet of Plainview. Retail Development,Oyster Bay,NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment,as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS,of a 12.78-acre light industrial property for proposed retail establishment in the hamlet of Hicksville. Residential Development,Oyster Bay,NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment,as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS,of a 5.03-acre commercial property for proposed development of a multi-family residential development in the hamlet of Oyster Bay. Cemetery and Residential Subdivision,Old Westbury,NY Ecological investigation and impact assessment,as well as participation in the preparation of the EIS,of a 97.3-acre residentially-zoned property for a residential subdivision and cemetery in the Village of Old Westbury. Neighborhood Character and Environmental Assessment,Various Sites,NY Neighborhood character and environmental assessments for variance applications in the Towns of Islip,Brookhaven,and Huntington. 0000 wa-©0 hb -- Planned Development District,Islip,NY Ecological impact assessment as well as participation in preparation of the EIS of a 78.8±-acre property for a proposed Planned Development District with a mix of residential units,commercial space and recreational areas in hamlet of Great River. PROFESSIONAL Project Manager. Responsible for coordination of activities EXPERIENCE associated with public utility wireless communications facilities. Technical tasks include the preparation of visual studies,zoning studies,EAFs,EISs,wetlands applications, testimony,and hearing exhibits,as well as testifying at hearings. VHB Engineering,Surveying and Landscape Architecture,P.C.,2150 Joshua's Path,Hauppauge,New York. January 2009-present. Project Manager. Responsible for coordination of activities associated with public utility wireless communications facilities. Technical tasks include the preparation of visual studies,zoning studies,EAFs,EISs,wetlands applications, testimony,and hearing exhibits,as well as testifying at hearings. Freudenthal&Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc., 1757-24 Veterans Memorial Highway,Islandia,New York. April 2005—December 2008. Environmental Analyst. Responsible for research and compilation of reports,preparation of grant applications (i.e.,Bond Act,1/4%Program,EPA Region 2),attendance at various meetings, presentation of environmental studies and programs,and preparation of negative declarations and short forms for SEQRA compliance. Suffolk County Department of Health Services—Office of Ecology,300 Center Drive,Riverhead. June 2003—April 2005. MS,Marine Biology,University of Massachusetts Education Dartmouth,2003 BA,Natural Science,Pordham University,2001 ENGINEERING DY�� FF80 ? 2017 REPORT VERIZON WIRELESS 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NEIN YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" Prepared by: Daniel Falasco, P.E., P.C. 94 Steuben Blvd. Nesconset, NY 11767 Phone: (516) 317-7209 dan.falasco@outlook.com F l I ENGINEERING REPORT VERIZON WIRELESS 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" Prepared by: Daniel Falasco, P.E., P.C. 94 Steuben Blvd. Nesconset, NY 11767 Phone: (516) 317-7209 dan.falasco@outlook.com 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number INTRODUCTION 2 SITE EVALUATION 4 CERTIFICATION 6 i RESUME 7 APPENDIX A TITLE SHEET, DRAWING No. T-100.00 APPENDIX B ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN, DRAWING No. SP-100.00 APPENDIX C EAST ELEVATION, ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN, DRAWING No. A-100.00 APPENDIX D COVER LETTER OF RIGOROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS WITH MODIFICATION DESIGN 1 i 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" INTRODUCTION As requested by Verizon Wireless, we have reviewed the plans prepared by WFC Architects, 12-1 Technology Drive, Setauket, NY 11733. The plans are titled Verizon "Orient Point 2", 40200 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957. The subject property is located on the south side of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25). The property contains a one (1)framed building used as a restaurant, a marina with fueling station, a storage building and an existing telecommunications facility for AT&T. The telecommunications facility consists of an existing 69'-0"± agl concealment pole and an existing AT&T equipment platform. The concealment pole contains AT&T antennas at 57'-0"± agl and 67'-0"± agl (centerline of existing antennas). The site also contains an existing electric transformer, meter and disconnect for the AT&T facility. Verizon Wireless proposes to install a telecommunication facility consisting of three (3) sector antennas and six (6) diplexers within a proposed 20'-0" extension to the existing 69'-0"± concealment pole, making the concealment pole 89'-0"± as follows: Alpha'Sector: One (1) panel antenna and two (2) diplexers will be mounted within the proposed 20'-0" extended section of the concealment pole. The panel antenna will be positioned to face in an easterly direction. The centerline elevation of the panel antenna will be 84'-6"± agl. The top elevation of the panel antenna will be 88'-6"± agl. Beta Sector: One (1) panel antenna and two (2) diplexers will be mounted within the proposed 20'-0" extended section of the concealment pole. The panel antenna will be positioned to face in an westerly direction. The centerline elevation of the panel antenna will be 84'76"± agl. The top elevation of the panel antenna will be 88'-6"± agl. Gamma Sector: One (1) panel antenna and two (2) diplexers will be mounted within the proposed 20'-0" extended section of the concealment pole. The panel antenna will be positioned to face in an northerly direction. The centerline elevation of the panel antenna will be 84'-6"± agl. The top'elevation of the panel antenna will be 88'-6"± agl. 2 40200 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 C05 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" INTRODUCTION (continued) In addition to the panel antennas being placed within the concealment pole, Verizon Wireless proposes to install a 13'-10" x 32'-0" raised equipment compound to support Verizon Wireless' equipment and an emergency back-up diesel gas generator, with j sound enclosure. The generator will contain a 54 gal. diesel tank. The raised platform will be supported by nine (9) helical piles (20'± deep), with i continuous concrete pile cap. The raised platform will be enclosed with a 13'-0" high chain link fence with privacy slats. A weather canopy will be placed above the proposed equipment, but not above the generator. The raised platform requires an area variance from the Town of Southold's Zoning Board of Appeals, as the side yard setback provided is 7'-3", whereas 25' is required in the Marine II zoning district. Verizon Wireless' application meets the standards for an area variance under New York State Town Law. Verizon Wireless' installation will be situated next to, and in line with, the existing AT&T facility and as such will not be out of character nor a detriment to nearby property. The benefit sought by Verizon Wireless cannot be achieved by other methods as the site already contains an existing concealment pole and all utilities required are on site. The variance sought is not substantial as the proposed raised platform is adjacent to the existing facility, which is set back the same distance of 7'-3" to the property line. By using an existing concealment pole and concealing the equipment compound with fencing and landscaping, the proposed facility and resulting variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The need for a variance was not self-created as the proposed location was chosen as it is consistent with AT&T's facility and that upland development opportunities are limited due to existing site conditions. Further, Verizon Wireless is proposing four(4) GPS units which will be mounted to the proposed weather canopy. Antenna cables will be routed along a proposed ice bridge from the equipment platform and up the inside of the concealment pole to the Verizon Wireless antennas. 3 40200 MAIN ROAD -� ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" SITE EVALUATION Proposed Verizon Wireless electric and telco power exist on the site and will be routed to the Verizon Wireless telecommunications facility as follows: Electric Power: Electric power to support the Verizon Wireless facility will be routed underground from the proposed Verizon Wireless electric meter and disconnect support rack to the proposed Verizon Wireless electric panel mounted in the equipment compound. Telco Power: Telco power to support the Verizon Wireless facility will be routed underground from the existing AT&T facility. Verizon Wireless' communication facility is designed to meet or exceed the applicable federal regulations (FAA & FCC) and the requirements of the New York State and local Fire and Building Codes. Attached as Appendix D is the cover letter of"Rigorous Structural Analysis Report With Modification Design", prepared by John N. Kabak, P.E. The full report was previously submitted to the Town of Southold. The letter states "Note: In order for this analysis results to be valid for the proposed, existing, and reserved loading in Appendix A the modifications referenced in the design drawing by GPD (Project#: 2015723.01.48780.02, dated 2/26/2015 must be installed." The analysis criteria utilized was TIA-222-G. The modifications required are the replacement of existing flange bolts with new bolts of higher grade at 29'-0"± agl. As further indicated in the structural report, the existing pole can structurally accommodate Verizon Wireless' proposed 20' -0" extension and antennas/diplexers concealed within. Verizon Wireless' proposed 20'-0" extension to the existing concealment pole, antennas, platform, emergency back-up generator and equipment will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of the site or surrounding properties, nor will the safety, health and general welfare be affected. The proposed cell site is an unmanned communication facility. Once every 4-6 weeks a technician in a passenger car will come to the site to do a diagnostic test to evaluate the network. As such, there will be no increase of vehicular traffic on public roads. Public facilities, such as electric and telephone, are already within the existing site and are deemed adequate for the proposed communication facility. Because Verizon Wireless' communication facility is unmanned, there will be no impact on public or private facilities for treatment, removal or discharge of sewage, refuse or other effluent. 4 40200 MAIN ROAD �� ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" SITE EVALUATION (continued) Further, all materials used in the construction of Verizon Wireless' communication facility will be in accordance with local building codes and will be subject to the Town of Southold Building Department reviews and approvals. There will not be any disturbance to adjacent properties due to dust, obnoxious gases, odors, smoke, soot, vibration, noise, etc. Verizon Wireless' communication facility will be accessed from existing site access points and as such, there will be no need to establish new driveways along existing roads. Further, existing parking areas are sufficient for parking by Verizon Wireless technicians servicing the facility. In summary, there will not be any hazard to life, limb or property resulting in the erection and installation of Verizon Wireless' communication facility. Further, the site is suitable for such use based on the existing conditions of the site, including the existing pole and collocation opportunity available. Finally, Verizon Wireless' application meets the standards for an area variance under New York State Town Law. 5 40200 MAIN ROAD d ORIENT, NEW YORK 11957 SITE: "ORIENT POINT 2" CERTIFICATION This Report was prepared as a result of a contractual agreement between Verizon Wireless and Daniel Falasco, P.E., P.C, and is for the use of Verizon Wireless, their consultants, and attorneys in support of Verizon Wireless' zoning and permitting application to the Town of Southold for a Wireless Service Facility. Daniel Falasco, P.E., P.C. does not accept any responsibility for this report if used by any other person, or persons, for any use other than for which this report is intended. This report was prepared under the supervision of Daniel Falasco, P.E. Daniel Falasco, P.E. New York State License No. 56999 Date 6 DANIEL FALASCO, P.E., P.C. gg Consultin Engineer Mr. Falasco has 40 years experience of that ranges from municipal to Education-- waterfront and site development. Early in his career he gained 85,1973,'Civil&. diversified experience with a national engineering corporation here on Environ mental'Engineering. Long Island. As a Project Director he was responsible for a full range of Clarkson University,`" engineering projects, gaining an insight into the economic, operational and regulatory constraints facing both municipal and private sectors. - His responsibilities also included scheduling, staffing, budgeting and - quality control while serving as a client liaison to a number of towns, r , - Rei isfration villages, school districts and other agencies. At this time Mr. Falasco I p,P.E. Ne Y64,•197.9, =< ' also serves as Village Engineer to five Villages in Suffolk County. Mr. Falasco has broadened his experience by serving as Commissioner of Planning and Development for a large Suffolk County township, which Professiona/Affiliations`,:• included Planning Board and Board of Zoning Appeals experience. American'Societytof Civil Engineering Mr. Falasco is qualified as an expert court witness and provides real estate and legal organizations with engineering insight regarding Honor Societies condemnation/acquisition procedures, values and environmental Tau Beta OF impacts. Chi Epsilon •• Verizon Wireless: Mr. Falasco provides expert testimony regarding site plan analysis and review in many Towns and Villages in both Nassau County and Suffolk County PROJECT EXPERIENCE: Key projects include: " ➢ NYS Route 27 (Sunrise Highway) ➢ NYS Route 27A(Montauk Highway) ➢ NYS Route 25 (Jericho Turnpike) ➢ NYS Route 25 A ➢ NYS Route 112 ➢ C.R. 16 ➢ C.R. 17 ➢ C.R. 35 ➢ C.R.57 ➢ C.R. 66 ➢ C.R. 80 ➢ C.R. 100 These projects required site visits, field measurements, preparation of before the taking site plans, after the taking site plans, evaluation of the impact of the taking area, preparation of reports suitable for court filing and expert witness testimony. 7 DANIEL FALASCO, P.E., P.C. Consulting Engineer `�� 3 Key Fixture Report projects include: ➢ 513 Porter Avenue ♦ Sunny Lumber NY, Inc. ♦ Lanoves, Inc. ♦ CCR Sheet Metal, Inc ♦ Lee's Stone Supply, Inc. ➢ Milton Abeles, Inc. ➢ Paul E.Abrams, R.Carballal and Mt. Hope Asphalt ➢ Allied Building Products ➢ Grace Industries, Inc. ➢ Karp Associates, Inc. ➢ Palatine Realty Corp. ➢ Techno Acoustics Holdings, LLC ➢ Domino's Pizza—Wyandanch ➢ CBS Outdoor Signs ➢ McAley Associates These facilities consisted of asphalt plants, office buildings, warehouses, lumber yard & construction material, custom cabinet manufacturers, access hatch manufacturers,ferry service, restaurant, billboard sign and trucking terminal. The Fixture Appraisals analyzed the reproduced costs&depreciated values of a wide array of items to assist condemnation procedures. Fairchild/Republic Airport Property. Development of a 91-acre site in Farmingdale for both industrial and commercial/retail use. The project involved the inventory and analysis of all structures on the property (1.8 million square feet) for both demolition and renovation costs and the potential rehabilitation costs for future private development of this property. Developed the site plan envelope for the property involving the review of issues ranging from the airport's clear zone easement requirements to environmental studies including groundwater evaluation and hazardous materials management. The project also involves traffic studies and intersection improvements such as traffic signalization along NYS Route 110 and New Highway and the realignment of Conklin Avenue. Venetian Shores Park, Town of Babylon, New York. Project involved the development of a recreational facility along the south shore of Long Island. Ball fields complete with lighting and irrigation were developed as well as the design for tennis and handball courts. A playground to meet the needs of all age groups was part of the overall plan. Venetian Shores was made complete with a boat launching facility and beach area. Preparation of applications for state funding were also included and 50% of the funding was obtained. 8 i DANIEL FALASCO, P.E., P.C. Consulting Engineer Village of Lindenhurst, New York. Prepared plans for the Village to raise miles of roads along the Great South Bay to prevent constant flooding. Work included establishment of minimum elevations, curb/gutter drainage and road improvements. This project was funded in part with Community Development funds. Village of the Branch,Suffolk County, New York. ➢ Preparation of a ten year plan to resurface and/or reconstruct all the Village roads. ➢ Major drainage project designed to protect homes and property in a flood plain area of the Nissequogue River. Village of Brightwaters,Suffolk County, New York. ➢ Converted the Village's Street Lights to energy efficient fixtures. ➢ Designed the largest project using recycled plastic lumber, over a half mile of bulkhead and breakwaters were constructed. ➢ Reconstructed over two miles of roads using recycled-in-place asphalt materials as a base course.The roads were then resurfaced. ➢ Designed the road and drainage project for Richland Boulevard. I Mr. Falasco was also a leading force in obtaining tens of millions of dollars for the Long Island Region. His involvement as Design Supervisor and Construction Inspector, included the administration of funds for the following projects: ➢ Village of Lindenhurst Fire Station ➢ West Islip School District's Bus Garage ➢ Town of Babylon-School District Sidewalks ➢ Town of Southold -Town Hall Addition ➢ Village of Patchogue-Town Parking Facility 9 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY: "' �0,0 ORIENT POINT 2 1" verizon 40200 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NY 11957 AxcHiTECTs WFC PROJECT NO: 14-10823 ICI TECHNOLOGY DRf VE,SETAUKEi NY 11737 P 6316898,1501 F 63168984591 xwwsvfpla mm SITE INFORMATION PROJECT CONTACTS DRAWING INDEX INITALISSUANCEUTRTN NO 63UANbCE REVLSIODATE VRIZON WIRELESS SITE NAME 'ORIENTPOW2' APPLICANT NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (91417147371 DWG NO DRAWING TITLE y d/b/a VRQON WIRELESS 4 CENTEOCK ROAD ARCHITECTURAL WEST NYACK NY 10994 T_10OW IIILESHEET 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 SITE TYPFJOECRIPTION WIT POSED 2D CONCEALMENT POLE EXfENNON INSTALL(3INEW ANTENNASAND 16) DIPIEXRS PROPERTY OWNER MGH ENTERPRISES,INC 1631)323.2424 AT GRADE INSTALL NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS(3)NEW ROB RTTHHAikSOAD ORIEN7.NY 11957 SP-10000 ARCHITECNRAL SITE PLAN 3/3/2016 d 5/23/16 MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOXES(121 NEW RRHs.(4)NEW GPS CONSULTANT UNITS(I I NEW IOKW DIESEL DC GENERATOR ATOP NEW q-IOOAO EAST ELEVATION,ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PIAN 3/3/2016 6 5/23/16 ELEVATED STEEL DUNNAGE PLATFORM LEASING CONTACT RYAN MAYBECK 1914)714 7371 A-10100 ANTENNA AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS AND ANTENNA PLUMBING DIAGRAM 3/3/2016 4 5/23/16 A-102M UGHTSPECIHCATION 3/22/16 4 5/23/16 ' PROJECT LO CATION 40200 MAIN ROAD CONSTRUCTION CONTACT KENNY UHLL 1631)2362108 ORIENT,NY 11957 TAX MAP NFO SECTION 15,BLOCK 9 AND LOTS 1 ZONING DISTRICT 1000 A/E IENGINEERI CONTACT NEIL Mr DONALD ALA,LEED AP 1631)689.8450 EXT 115 ZONING DESIGNATION MARINE II NO DATE SUBMISSION 0 3/3/16 ESD LATITUDE 41 15294(NADW) PSEG LONG ISLAND CONTACT SUSAN BRUCE-FENSOD (631)34&6044 - ISSUED FOR W 1 3/29/16 R51M f91 ATTORfY/lRB COrT9U5 LONGITUDE -7224419(HAD 83) 2 4/18/16 REVISED ELEVATION 5'+/-AMSC(MOVE)29) 4/22/16 FOR RIG 29) 4 SWIG ISSUED FOR FLNG ZONING JURISDICTION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD VZW PROJECT CODE 20141IM470 VZW LOCATION CODE 311204 •CONTRACTOR SMALL COMPLY WITH THE NEW YORK ONE-CALL PROCEDURES BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION DRILLING OR BORING K 1 VZW CELLO 1)ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CALL 2 TO 10 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF OPERATORS RECORD THE SERIAL NUMBER AND LIST OF NOTIFIED UTILITY NO DATE REVISION OPERATORS KEY PLAN 2)AFTERCALU G THE CALLERS MUST WAIT THE 3 WORKING DAYS AS DESCRIBED IN NYS CODE 753 AS AREA OFwoRK TO GIVE ADEQUATE TIME TO THE NOTIFIED OPERATORS TO RESPOND 31 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST PROVIDE AS MUCH INFORMATION ON THE WORKSITE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ONE CALL CENTER -- —Q 1 4)IT 15 SUGGESTED WHEN WORKING ON AIRPORT PROPERTY THAT THE CALLER REQUEST A SITE MEETING AS TO MAKE THE WORK LOCATION CLEAR TO ALL MARKCIUT CREWS 5)IFTHE PROJECTr IS TO EXTEND PAST IO WORKING DAYS RIS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THATTHETICKET 8 BE UPDATED EVERY 10 WORKING DAYS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MAXIMUM PROTECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES �- LOCATION MAP KEY MAP NOTES 1 . rl) 1� P"ti -:L-` -fir .r -). �•"`_,-.�: _ ... _ _ QUALITY ASSURANCE - A Wo&monsh,psh(A be of the highest quality and done by employees skilled In the practice of their turtle `�� -,P6�LvTc+fLn B wh mon;^I .X� � J,^ ABwcrkfchfaistomeet the standcrtltive sasherein d bed sholr. bereplacedbytheContractoo1the Conlroctorssole e pense mtludrk ingthewoofothers fi,q, damaged by me Initial falure or the correcrepairs J %.IAon1i Af n II ..5 a -F,I; s14MJo ,J . N ON Iph veve Crnttt_�• '(}/\\� ',g�`/ t,` ,'•�. - `,, _ C AU items of voik,denhRed On the drowings by name note or malend designation are new unless olhervnse noted verIzOn r rye - r�rJ• � �`,6�..�® �v.*.1 I,��I� 1"- .. -- �.,1, +' = r - 1 'A t`•,:� ,?l5 „:/I� q _ 4 ' } /0200 Mnin N61, Sire' < - •i',i '.r1'r.. r a^�'. n SAFETY B HEALTH PROVISIONS _ 'ORIENT POINT 2' The A osafety Contractor shall be responsible for initialing. and supaMsing all Precautions and proBmmsin connection with the performance of the Contract The Conhaclorsho0 take reasonable precautions for the safe of,and Shell o,de reasonable protection to prevent damage,in orloss to em o ees execuhn the work and other ns Who pathereby The Contractor sha0�ve notices and tour witha ordinances d Y g w ouch omaybeaffected e y g dY pWeadelaws, c s Nas.smqu Tom and lawlW �, •�', _ 111 ;,-4 VVVV- •}r _ - - - oMers of publio authantles beating on the safety of al persons and/or}heir protection from Injury The Controcfw shc0 erect and maintain as regWred by esdsting .y \ - ',1•� ,'I`I^ �i, •} - ontliHo f 1 o m and performance of the Contract,masonotle safeguards for safety and pro ech n,Inducing erecting temporary barriers posting dongerngm and other { •'+ . ?''��t '�: /`tt,1`�, warnings against hotards promulgating safe regulations and notifying nets and users of adjacent sites spaces and utilities. ��+� .. ��^ b '�1- „}„ t`V M1 �,.• it. _ `3'" g a9 Pr mV19 9 N g N go 1 P 1 40200 MAN ROAD ?$ it t_ ,�. - '''�s' - 1,• ( - _ 'j's:J• - _ __- B A0 necessary precoulions shop be taken by the Contractor,throughout the course of the project,to ensure that � r 57 1 Safe and in ProPer 9ress and egress from Pll project areas wit be maintained TIRE ''4•. "51' 'rti'v „�` ��� Jp _ ;r'.'rb 2.Fire protection and life safe Ms within the let property twined safety compare projects area wit be Pe Y mom 1 - t� -- "._- /'f;,,-1 1 3 Structural Integrity of the concealment pole WE be maintained Construction materials shy be spread out It placed on framed celtrrg or roof members Loads shot not ��.��T gn q equate sharing and ar bracing where structure has at attained design strength / ."•-t. �9. r_ exceed the dell Frve load per s uare foot Provide ad 4 There wD be no creation 11node outside the hours of BAO AM ro 600 PM unless agreed to in advance.In wnMg with the Drape M owner DATE: MARDI 12076 -• kT. _ 'r'! - /',r t;,1' _ _ - 5 project area security shcU be maintained In aider to prevent uneuthomed entry to the premises and/or secured portions thereof PROJECT NO 14-1= 6 Water.Gas,ElectnON and otherutidles as applicable,shall not be Interrupted duringtinction,unless agreed tan advance.In writing DRAWN BY CPI( cpm g vnth the property owner ) - "'S,M r. _l.(• r! - - _ ..�s.r _ ` yr,• ':..•" - CHECKED BY TM 1'`•'• 7 Thera will be no accumulation of dA and dust The Contractor shol leave the area of work broom dean a1 the end of each day SCALE AS SITE LOCATION NORTH�2; SCALE 1"=200' NORTH DRAWING NO �Sr SITE LOCATION T 100.00®0.O0 ` - SHEET NO I OF 5 APPENDIX A iLLOCONTRACTOR IS TO RESTORE ANY AREA WHICH IS AFFECTED BY THE FLOW ) ) WIRE FENCING WIRED OR 0 ' '\ INSTALLATION OF ANY ITEMS AND/OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THIS SCOPE OF J I STAPLED TO PO µOy1 (14-1/z GA.,sXs'MESH) 0 � 1 Y 0 /�� BALES TO BE SET 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SITE SPECIFIC SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STAKES\„P]J ON GRADE \ VEPoZON WIRELESS PROJECT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE SIGNAGE BOTTOM OF DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC(MVE SEE SECTION] \ CHANNEL OR SLOPE 140NWIRE E APPROVED ( QEVAA (SEE SECTION) LGE 3 ALL TRENCHES TO BE HAND EXCAVATED AND BACKFILLED TO ENSURE WIRE EQUAL) WOOD \ATTAcAC JO NTS WATERTIGHT NG EXTESf PRIOR TOGROUNDUr"TIBACKFILLNG ARE NOT DISTURBED IrW(E ALL PVC FENCE TO BE ANGLED SPACED 24”C-C, POST TOWARD SLOPE IN TOP AND MID SECTION i BUILDING WIRE OR \\ 4 THE CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF THE FACIUTY WILL NOT HBI DRAINAGE CHANN TWINE(TYP) 2'X 2"STAKES INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND THE USUAL AND POSTS(TVP) I (TWO EACH RALE) CUSTOMARY TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION OF RADIO.TELEVISION OR OTHER COMPACTED 14"x To'x 36' COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OR WITH ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES BACKFILL STRAW BALES \ 5 EXISTING TREES,LOW LUNG VEGETATION, PRIORS AND BOATS IN AREA y S�LOpp 6'X6'-IRENC \ OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TO BE CLEARED PRIOR TO STMT OF SLOPE EXISTING OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION SILT FENC / �T- RADE UTILITY LINES FROM 6 1ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PLANTED TO PROVIDE A R C H ] T E C T $ 0. RACE \ UTILITY POLE 835 CONTIGUOUS SCREENING TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF THE NEW EQUIPMENT _ \BEYOND AREA, 12.1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE,SLTAUKLT,NY 11733 fi' PEN MON INTO DRAINAGE CHANNEL I — �� P 63168984501 F 63168984591 w.w�vf<em.com CROUND(SEE SECTION) Fa ev�lnew OR SLOPE COMPACTED BACKFILL 7 LANDSCAPING TO BE KEPT IN EAT HEALTHY CONDITION AND SHALL BE REPLACED SHOULD ANY TREE(5)DIE AT ANY POINT DURING THE DURATION NUTF.PERIODIC MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED AS NEEDED TO FENCE AND FABRIC TO / // /„ :0.a \ OF THE SITE BEING IN USE REMOVE ACCUMULATED MATERIALS AND REPAIR FENCE. EXTEND INID TRENCH SILT FENCE DETAIL4 HAY BALE DETAIL ROCION ONTRO M Ac R S SCALE:N.T SSCALE, / 1 CUR NG THE COURSE CONSTRUCTION,CERTAIN EROSION AND / yy SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BECOME NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE / YP'• \ TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OFF-SNE AREAS,PONDS,WATER COURSES, NOTE DRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS,CABLES AND ETC THAT SHALLBE MOUNTED WITHIN A DRAINAGE INLETS,RECHARGE BASINS,WETLANDS,ETC ACTUAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE DICTATED BY FIELD CONDITIONS AS PROPOSED 20'E7TIENSION TO THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A NEW YORK STATE / < CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES,BUT THE FOLLOWING GENERA-CONDITIONS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER(NOT WFC) SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHOULD BE FILED SEPARATELY AND ' p� 9 SHALL BE OBSERVED CONSULTANT CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS.ALL SUCH WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY OTHERS(NOT WFC) O PROPERTY LINE,TYP / A EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AND / REMAIN UNDISTURBED AN WETLDS OEIINEATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands / T B CLEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO AS TO HAWKINS 11 JAEGER PLLC,560 WALT WHRMAN ROAD MELVILLE,NY 11747,(fi37) / + MINIMIZE THE SIZE OF EXPOSED MEAS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME 732-7777,(VST DATED NOVEMBER 15,2014 PROJECT NO OB-0099 SURVEY AND EXISTING / �''5 THAT AREAS ME EXPOSED WETLAND DELINEATION ORIGINALLY PERFORMED ON APRIL 6,2006 ) STORAGE \J / \ C THE LENGTH AND STEEPNESS OF CLEARED SLOPES SHALL BE BUILDING \SCO\O / �4 v- I MDINIMRUN FF SHILLIZED TO CBERDIVERTED AWAY UNOFF PROM CLEARED SLOPES E SEDIMENT SHALL BE TRAPPED ON THE SITE O V / G SPECIFIC METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND pU Pte( Qp� C� MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO'THE (+V P�Q,`� �Pj NEW YORK GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL' pp �( NO DATE SUBMISSION PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ELECTRIC CONDUITS TRENCHED '\"� a SSS 7"P .(F,� } e y 601i' / O, 2 SEDIMENT BARRIERS(SILT FENCE,HAY fl4LE5 OR APPROVED EQUAL) O 3/3/b SITED FOR IEYRw UNDERGROUND FROM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ELECTRICAL V� ,�,P Q O� qA/ + `EXISTING F� SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE METER AN DISCONNECT SUPPORT RACK TO PROPOSED VERIZON �LG� pC\ �` \'"•'AS' MARINA FOR THE DURATION OF THE WORK NO SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHA!- 1 3!19/16 NEED Hal Ano" EY/MB COMMENTS WIRELESS ELECTRIC PANEL MOUNTED ON PROPOSED ELEVATED Ojv S / + y / / BE PERMITTED TO WASH ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES,WETLANDS OR 2 4/118,16 REVISED EQUIPMENT PLATFORM C• SON �\� w�\t jY +/o'I"` � /ry0,4 *(,� / ROADS 3 482/16 FOR FANG PROPOSED 14'-0"HIGH X 6'-0'WIDE EASTERN L '1� 3 GRADED AND STRIPPED MEAS AND STOCKPILES SHALL BE KEPT 4 623/16 ISSUED FOR RMC, F °v46 STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF TEMPORARY SEEDING AS REQUIRED. RED CEDARS AT 6'-0'OC,TYP OF(9) CLOSEST DISTANCE BETWEEN LIMITS OF SEED MIXTURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOIL CONSERVATION �yqT, •4 3; SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS MENDATIONS CLEANING AND WETLANDS 4 DRANAGE INLETS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SHAT BE CC 'R PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT BUILDUP THROUGH THE USE OF SEDIMENT EXISTING PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT / } ® ® t d ° TRANSFORMER.METER + Fy, /O3' BARRIERS,SEDIMENT'TRAPS,ETC„AS REQUIRED CN CABINETS MOUNTED ON NEW ELEVATED a •P ( AND DISCONNECT O GALVAN[ZED STEEL PLATFORM SEE 3/A-100.00 / \ Jp 5 PROPER MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IS TO BE /ii b PERFORMED AS INDICATED BV PERIODIC INSPECTION AND AFTER HEAVY OR FOR MORE INFORMATION EXISTING RESTAURANT AND j PROLONGED STORMS. F SEDIMENT ME/INS AN INCLUDE,BUY ME NOT NO DATE REV610N MARINE FUELING STATION / LIMITEDR T0,CLEANING OF SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS.CLEANING N //* / DIVERSIONS,AND CLEANING OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS. REPAIROFIN Er PRRAND OTECTIor ONMS AND KEYrwN ARFAQFWORK EXISTING @F COMPATIBLE WITH t / /a s •q� /�j 6 APPROPRIATE MEANS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL DUST DURING CONCEALMENT POLE WffH PROPOSED // \ � /� sem' B,o° t' + 20'-0'IXIENSION p w I'Y '�� • / \ / 6•, 41. •'A TA 4 If CONSTRUCTION --_- - J /} 7 A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO FACILITY NOTES PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE DEBRIS FORM BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL \sa y ROADS THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE _ I b / + A)PROPOSED FEATURES ARE LABELED AS SUCH,ALL ELSE EXISTING OR SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED A PROPOSED BY OTHERS I /} B)THE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY IS 8 SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL Y UNMANNED AND WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL UPLAND DISTURBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY / 2pP4A °'8 �• /�:J� Cyd LINE(-----) // MANTENANCE PURPOSES,THEREFORE R IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO STABILIZED,AFTER PERMANENT STABILIZATION.PAVED MEAS SHALL BE s I REPRESENTS LIMITS AN t /} GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE_FUMES,VIBRATIONS•DUST,ODORS OR CLEANED AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CLEANED AND FLUSHED AS NECESSARY. w2 CLEARING,GRADING AND t °% EXISTING .(� GROUND DISTURBANCE TRIC 9 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTE Q /BO•_B• C)NO ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE,AN 7H6 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PIAN SHALL CONFORM TO THE R14O•^D. 1 MMINA� J 'H ,,L IS M UNMANNED SITE EROSION MD SEDIMENTATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NYSDEC SPDES / // \A�` 1 D)NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION + !V� (v� USE,AS THIS 15 AN UNMANNED SITE ACTIVITY •� v /o- r r / OJ OQ 10 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE HAY BALES.SILT FENCE OR OTHER I a0 I E)NO USE WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ME REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED APPROPRIATE MEMS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM WASHING NYSDEC I al Wetlan (� { INTO DRAINAGE INLETS EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN .`Q• \V F)THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS THE PROPOSED SITE ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW YORK STATE GUIDELINES FOR URBAN EROSION + QS FPS' G)TIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE AND SEDIMENT CONTROL / + O H)THE MONITORING OCTIONE OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE 11 ALL TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED MUST BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. `v, y¢ �� \. verizon WITH CHAPTER 27 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF PROPOSED YORK STATE 12 TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT POLLIIiWC AR WITH OUST AND \ \ TF IT' AND NFPA 70,FOR ELECTRICAL WORK AND GROUNDING PARTICULATE NATTER �y J9° I/ •� �'U. k iy'/ L OSION CONTR STABI 7ATION FABRIC13 ALL SLOPES .REFER TO GRATING AND DRAINATER THAN 1 3 SHALL RECEIVE GE:PLAN AND OL + PROPOSED 14'-0"HIGH X 6'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION •' 6O�.� + 6'-0"0WIDE CEASTERN... RED CEDARS AT STORM WATER RUN-OFF MANAGEMENT PIAN 'ORIENT POINT 2' � n / 4Po s�04+ SHRUBS SHALL BE SET PLUMB REMOVE TWINE I ALL STORM WATER RUN-OFF GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED + I FROM MOUND TOP ET ROOT BALL LEAVE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF THE 4'DEEP PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION / BURLAP IN PLACE,ROLL BACK 1/3 OF BURLAP SHREDDED WOOD 40200 MAN ROAD CHIP MULCH (REMOVE,UNLESS BIODEGRADABLE.) 2 ALL CONSTRUCTION ON SITE SHAT BE PROTECTED BY HAY BALE AND C��, ,�� ° EXISTING BOAT SILT FENCING PURSUANT TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE NY - y, 12' STATE STORM WATER DESIGN MANUAL THESE FEATURES SHALL REMAIN IN 348.41- ' Q.- } LAUNCH RAP ON ALL SIDES l 6'SOIL SAUCER PLACE UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED l to INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED By. TO PREVENT EROSION HA 'Y A HAWKINS WEBB JAEGER PLLC,560 WALT WHITMAN ROAD,MELVILLE,NY 11747, TOLE (631)732-7777.(DATED NOVEMBER 15,2014 PROJECT NO 06-0099) 3 ALL WORK MUST CONFORM TO FEMA FLOOD ZONE REQUIREMENTS NySO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN EXISTING fC Tda/ Wet/Dnds * ^ BULIG'EADLATITU��� �' ZONING TABLE LONGITUDE. .7224419 ImADHAD I 'kms // LONGIyOE -72244191NAD 831 s3s•g4• \ \\`S _ DATE MARCH t aTM 40'}y EXISTING BAY FINISHED >/� U' =J_k Z71RC =-JIFF I- S Ei3=-_• -:�=I1F�1 f II«�I_LITI:T ELEyATpN 5'a/-AMSC NGVD 29 ENTRANCE GRADE /�� // I I PROJECTNO i4-MM EXISTING SHORELINE DN RS @M q� �$�'b - / ' REQUIRED PROPOSED TAX AP INFO SECTION 15,BLOCK 9 AND LOT B I DRAWN BY JG ROLL BACK / // / m \/ / §280-56 MACINUM HEIGHT 35'/2 STORIES 20'(B9'TOTAL MONOPOLE) ZONNG DISTRICT 1000 CHECKED BY TM C BURLAP 1/3 ��/�/��/���\ �� � \\y/�/• §280-56 NZONING DESIGNATION MARINE II SCALE A3 NOTED WIMUM FRONT YARD 35' 694'-7'(COMPOUND) DRAWING No —A—/;— ANTENNA CABLE BACKFILL TOPSOIL 1&280-56 MINIMUM REAR a 25' 197'-B•(COMPOUND) 0' 20' 4O BO' —T—T— TELCO CONDUIT MIXTURE WITH §280-56 MINIMUM SIDE YARDS 25' 7'-3•(COMPOUND) 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -T E T E— TELCO TIC CONDUIT IC CONDUIT TREE PLANTING DETAIL 0-20-0 I.- __O• S P 100.00 2 FEET LI2ER AT §280-56 AGGREGATE SIDE YARDS 50' 250'-11' COMPOUND SCALE = 1"=40'-0' / / SCALE = NTS THE RATE OF 5 ( ) NORTH SHEEP NO 2 CF 5 LBS.PER YARD APPENDIX B NOTE DRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF NEW VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS,CABLES AND ETC THAT SHALL BE MOUNTED WITHIN A PROPOSED 20'EXTENSION PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ICE BRIDGE WITH(12)PROPOSED TO THE EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A NEW YORK STALE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER(NOT WFC) SIGNED LEASE 7/8'0 ANTENNA CABLES AND SEALED DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHOULD BE FILED SEPARATELY AND CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS ALL SUCH WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED DASHED LINE REPRESENTS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (3)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOXES BY OTHERS NOT WFC WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE MOUNTED TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME V PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS ATOP (12)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRH UNITS(STACKED) PROPOSED 292 5 S F STEEL DUNNAGE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM GENERAL NOTES No TO PROPOSED UNISTRUT FRAME WITH PROPOSED WEATHER CANOPY ABOVE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS STEEL STAIR PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10KW DIESEL GC GENERATOR WITH LA 1 ALL WORK SHALL A DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS L LOCAL, -1 SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOSED ELEVATED STEEL STATE,AND FEDERAL.LAWS,ORDINANCE,AND REGULATIONS WHEREVER APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND ARRANGE ALL THIRD PARTY SPECIAL DUNNAGE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM 54 CAL.DIESEL TANK CONTAINED WITHIN GENERATOR ENCLOSURE) INSPECTIONS REQUIRED UNDER NYS BC CHAPTER 17. __ 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITE°THE SITE AND 70 HAVE —x—x—x—x x—x /I.-�= x— x— �u — x_x —x x -x —x-7 Z (3)PROPOSED VERIFIED ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID _ _ O SECTOR WIRELESS 3 IN ALL CASE,DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR INFORMATION FIGURED �--- --� V1 SECTOR ANTENNAS — -- _'-' - O Z AN (6)PROPOSED DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD -1=" -- %�_= PoUI-RR1 1- -� pPo1 N MDB LOB f I Lal OIPLEXERS MOUNTING 4 CONTRACTOR SNALL VERIFY ANO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT =[__ -_L r Z P.�TFORM I ��— r- — T—= Il A R C H I T E C T S WITHIN PROPOSED AND JOB CONDITIONS,AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, -' �- C LU 20'EXTENSION OF CONFLICTS,AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY `j=?- -= --�= r -=1 I2-I TECHNOLOGY DRIVL,SETAUKLT,NY11733 O EXISTING MONOPOLE COMPLETION OF THE WORK SHOULD HE FAIL TO FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE AND P 611689.8450 I F 6 31 689 8419 T.rv..+wf amm l+l CONTINUE WITH THE WORK,HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY r'I �•u,_�— TfW _ ARISING 0 ROM THEREF 5 ALL ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BY NAME,NOTE,OR MATERIAL j 9712 EXISTING DESIGNATION ARE NEW,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I I - BA71EAf I - 0 CONCEALMENT 0_ POLE WITH 6 ALL NEW MATERIALSAND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE -T- FULLY SHIELDED FLA00 TT PROPOSED 20-0 MANUFACTURERS LATEST PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS,AND WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE I I _� LIGHTS MOUNTED TO 4 (- EXTENSION REQUIREMENTS I WEATHER CANOPY P057S I-.J - h BENEATH WEATHER -1 }-� 7 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD TRADE I I CANOPY TYPICAL FOR(3) II �� PRACTICE EACH TRADE SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADE TO FACILITATE JOB I I REFER TO DETAIL SCHEDULING AND COMPLETION 1/A-102.00 LL, 4- 1-- 8 PROPRIETARY NAME IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO DESIGNATE THE I I - __- _� --"i=--=}-- I CONSULTANT STANDARD OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS OF EQUAL DUALITY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE - - ��" ✓-=,_= ARCHITECTS REVIEW 9 EACH CONTRACTOR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ADJOINING / `I /I TBLp — /� ��—— ,_� �� '-T � REMAINING AREAS'IA RESULT OF HIS WORK,AND SHAREPAIR DAMAGED E //'('I I �'� I 1 --T^-•I-� - -��--�- �'I SURFACTO ENTIRE RESULT LL PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED - COMPLETE 7HE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. 10, ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED,AS NECESSARY.TO TO MATCH EXISTING CONTIGUOUS SURFACE OR NEW FINISHES SHOWNx—x��I—x •— x—x—x—%- -x—z 11 AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY,EACH TRADE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE 26'-0", FOR CLEARING UP THEIR WORK RUBBISH REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE IN A DUST ,c INHIBITIVE FASHION,AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL DERE AND BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION NO DATE SVBNJSSxIN 12. CLEAN ALL FLOORS,WALLS,DOORS,MISC.CLASS.ETC LEAVING JOB FREE OF (4)PROPOSED VERZON WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO 0 3/3/16 IMUSID FOR REVIEW DUST AND DEBRIS,PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION EXISTING AT&T PLATFORM PILE + PROPOSED WEATHER K FEOPY NCING —�# PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WTR1 PRIVACY SLATS 2 4/�4 �I4R ANIXdEYMB COM,9iT5 13 EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED,WHICH ARE NOT PROPOSED 4'-0'WIDE SWING GATE �I PROPOSED CANOPY POST,TYP FOR(6) 3 4/22/16 FOR RING PROPERTY TO BE RELOCATED OR RETAINED BY THE OWNER,SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND REMOVED FROM THE PREMISE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS TELCO CANNER TRENCHED FROM (9)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS HELICAL PILES(t20' 4 ` M B91ED FOR FRNG PROPOSED VERIZONWITH WIRELESS TELCO CABINET TO EXISTING MESA DEEP/CONCRETE PIERS WITH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE PILE CAP IN INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVE°ARE GENERAL ONLY.AND ARE NOT SPAN CABINET WITHIN EXISTING AT&T COMPOUND INTENDED 70 SHOW ALL ITEMS WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL SUCH TTENS SMALL BE REMOVED,RELOCATED,AND/OR REINSTALLED,AS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK 15 ALL MINIMUM 4,000 PSI ATS 0 FOR 28 DAYS,AIR ON-SITECONSTRUCTION FROMN47 TO BE 5% AIR ENTRAINED, 5% (D.! = 3/8ENLARGED EOUIPMENT PLAN B' 1'-4' 2'-B' 3/6%-"% .....J NORTH NO DATE RLVL610N KEY PLAN AREA OF W ORK (12)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 7/8'0 ANTENNAS CABLE ROUTED WITHIN EXISTING CONCEALMENT POLE �. 2'-4 1/2' * -t-2'-4 1/2'__+ +_2'-5 1/2'_J� PROPOSED TREES AROUND BACK AND SIDE OF PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 9 COMPOUND TO MATCH EXERTING TREES AROUND AT&T COMPOUND REFER TO SITE PLAN 1/SP-100.00 AND DETAIL 2/SP-1 G0.00 I PROPOSED 13'-0'HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH PRIVACY SLATS I (4)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS GPS UNITS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED WEATHER CANOPY O �� 4 PROPOSED VERIZONIT WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND SED DIESEL EL GENERATOR WITH SOUND ENCLOSURE SET ATOP PROPOSED PUN NEW o m ELEVATED GALVANIZED STEEL PLATFORM PROPALCATEL-LUCENT EZBFo STACKABLE WIRELESS TREE(BEYOND)AROUND BACK AND SIDE OF PROPOSED VERIZON 3 w o. BATTERY CABINETS SPECIFICATIONS yyJ2 � WIRELESS COMPOUND TO MATCH EXISTING TREE AROUND AT&T COMPOUND REFER 1:1 TO SITE PLAN 1/SP-100.00 AND DETAIL 2/SP-1G0.00 N w WEIGHT WITHOUT BATTERIES--638 LBS i ¢ DmQ T FENCED IN EQUIPMENT AREA TO REMAIN BOF SHEEP ED a 2828 LBS BATTERY Ah ma y" of a EXISTING TREE AROUND EXISTING AT&T COMPOUND TO ( ) 100(Ah) FROM �C REMAIN PER BATTERY WEIGHT h LBS _ 8 8 < ¢ >1Y/ x K y f COOLING FAN°COOLED ELE1C 10EW ■ n a Fn ¢ te r. '. }Pi6P C+., •4• `•jf verizo LL o o J � ' fx = cNx'� ' r I BATTERY CABINET DETAILS Jj(: �:tK us`.; 'lY,c^;�;: �{; ...jx!,, t t •� ;f"` r' %ski �w'< ' <.,a, .,,rf.,,: I /tv�_c r ' f �<� ^.<`>,f r 'ORIENT POINT 2' '. yy yc� ` p, f�1r...¢.'. �a ice„ 4FT7`✓• �J'c:.`�.�4+^4 i�. '' { ->,%i".: v'` t�/, ; 40200 MAN ROAD {'lR�•2°a'�: Gty�"'rte :�,^s",�,�a�'.L+ ivy; %:,%f-."�iY,,;.v` �.., , 0ENT,NY 11957 Q � Ble.s�lH �^•LTi TRIS I i I I I I I Y EAST ELEVATION, J LJ LJ L H j T�nidi R ENLARGED EQUIPNENT PLAN 'L EXISTING FENCING PROPOSED FENCING DATE MARCH l 2016 PROJECT NO 14-71823 (9)PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS HELICAL PILES(320' OUTDOOR CABINETS NEW 1T)�j-}1,2�I �,t DRAWN BY MC DEEP/CONCRETE PIERS WTTH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE PILE At CATEL-wcENT ucHTRA0I0 CABINET CHECKED BY TM CAP 9]12 OLITOOOR C RINET 180KG SGm AS NOTED FRONT EL EV SIDE EL EV REAR ELEV DRAWING NO BEAST ELEVATION Ol 1-A' 2'a, 5'-4' X9712 ENODE CABINET DETAILS q-100.00 SCALE= 3/18" = V-0" "T SCALE= 1/2"=1'-0" SHEET NO 3 OF 6 -- APPENDIX C 7Q3 at&t GPD Engineering and Architecture Professional Corporation AT&T Towers Kevin Clements 2300 Northlake Center Dr., Suite 405 520 South Main Street, Suite 2531 Tucker, GA 30084-4032 Akron, OH 44311 (330) 572-3546 kciements@gpdgroup.com GPD#2015723.01.48780.02 February 26,2015 RIGOROUS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT WITH MODIFICAITON DESIGN AT&T DESIGNATION: Site USID: 48780 Site FA: 10107374 Verizon Site Name: ORIENT POINT Site Name: EAST ORIENT POINT AT&T Project: Verizon Extension Tower Only Co-location 10.29.2014 ANALYSIS CRITERIA: Codes: TIA-222-G 120-mph (3-second gust)with 0" ice 50-mph (3-second gust)with 0.75" ice SITE DATA: 40200 Main Road,Orient, NY 11957, Suffolk County Latitude 410 9' 9.9" N, Longitude 721 14' 38" W Market: NYC/NNJ 69'Valmont Stealth Monopole w/proposed 20' extension Mr. Reggie Barrau, GPD is pleased to submit this Rigorous Structural Analysis Report with Modification Design to determine the structural integrity of the aforementioned tower. The purpose of the analysis is to determine the suitability of the tower with the existing and proposed loading configuration detailed in the analysis report. Analysis Results Tower Stress Level with Proposed Equipment: 71.5% Pass Foundation Ratio with Proposed Equipment: 31.5% Pass Note: In order for this analysis results to be valid for the proposed, existing, and reserved loading in Appendix A the modifications referenced in the design drawings by GPD (Project#: 2015723.01.48780.02, dated 2/26/2015) must be installed. ' We at GPD appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and AT&T Towers. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, Wff 0Frtr MRM PINT O� "t•• �1 -iwl'0[i i4'� Y ]\� � L 4-.34r✓�}y.'N�..� .i 1.7 „t .Pi S �� f�t✓i S^Y� iJ��.Y ''�-1.0 �L.�7 C'ai1�\fa-`A��'.lisv"Y�9 John N. Kabak, P.E. New York#: 090039-1LU O �9003�-` <L SRO StO�P/ 520 South Main Street Suite 2531 .Akron,O �?13•]•}�3i0-572-2100.Fax 330-572-2101 .www.GPDGroup.com GPD Engineering and Architecture Professional Corporation Fuentes, Kim From: Leslie Weisman Forward Sent: Tuesday,January 31, 2017 11:45 AM To: Flatley, Martin Cc: Fuentes, Kim; Schneider, Kenneth;Jerry Geohri r Horning; Leslie T1 Weisman Forward; Duffy, Bill Subject: Re: Meeting Hi Chief,, . �® The ZBA is meeting this Thursday Feb 2 for public hearings on applications which includes the Verizon application. I will forward your comments to each of the Board members and to KimFuentes,our Board Secretary so that it becomes part of our public record,which we use to make,decisions.Thanks for your comments Leslie Sent from my iPad On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Flatley, Martin <mflatley@town.southold.nv.us>wrote: Hi Leslie, I hope that this is your scheduled meeting on Thursday at 11 am regarding a Verizon cell phone tower at Orient By The Sea Marina, if not, I apologize. Leslie I was told that this meeting was critical for the addition of Verizon Wireless to receive permission to go on this tower site by some of our officers and I was wishing to provide comments on same. As you are most likely aware, two of the critical infrastructures as designated by the Counter Terrorism community that we are part of for our township lie at Orient Point- Plum Island Animal Disease Research Center and the Cross Sound Ferry System.We participate with various agencies in drills at these two locations and have responded several actual criminal incidents at these two locations with our County,State and Federal partners.A recurring issue has always been communications from Orient Point and Plum Island both by radios and by cell phones. If your meeting today addresses an approval process for Verizon Wireless, I would fully support the improvement of a Verizon wireless telephone signal at this location, as it would have a direct positive effect on our department's communication between Orient Point/Plum Island and our Headquarters and points beyond, especially our Marine Units that patrol this area by boat. Thanks Leslie for your time in reading this, and as I said, I hope I am directing this to the correct department head. Martin Flatley,Chief of Police Southold Town Police Department 41405 State Route 25 Peconic, New York 11958 631-765-3115 <image001.jpg> n , C,- AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC J;-v— V tg�►�' COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR ------------ SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 TEL:(516)227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 February 2,2017, BY HAND DELIVERY Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building ', 70 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals(the"ZBA")in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility(the"Communication Facility")to be located at 40200 Main Road,Orient,New York, Suffolk County Tax Map designation District 1000, Section, 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property") Public Hearing Date: February 2,2017 VZW Site Reference: Orient Point 2/Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Madam Chairperson and Members of the ZBA: In support of Verizon Wireless'Application to the ZBA for the proposed Communication Facility to be located at the Property, enclosed are the following materials: 1. Correspondence from the Suffolk County Police Department, dated December 2, 2016, expressing support of Verizon Wireless' Application; 2. f Engineering Report,prepared by Daniel Falasco,P.E.,P.C., dated January 25, 2017; 3. Planning,Zoning and Visual Impact Analysis prepared by VHB Engineering,Surveying,and Landscape Architecture,P.C., dated January 2017; 4. RF Report, prepared by C Squared Systems,LLC, dated December 14,2016; 5. Antenna Site FCC Compliance Assessment and report,prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group, dated March 15, 2016; and 6. Real Estate Consulting Report prepared by Lynch Appraisal,Ltd., dated February 2, 2017. We respectfully request that the ZBA enter the foregoing items,in their entirety,into the record on the Application. Thank you for your time and attention to this Application. Yenise myurs, J. Vista Enclosures BOARD MEMBERS ��F $®U�y Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ® 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning °Q ,��`� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider l�C®(fme� Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017: 11:15 A.M. — MGH ENTERPRISES, INC., VERIZON WIRELESS #7023 - Request for a Variance under Article XIII, Section 280-56; and the Building Inspector's October 18, 2016 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to collocate a wireless communications facility on subject property at: 1) less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 25 feet; located, at: 40200 NYS Route 25, (Adj. to Gardeners Bay) Orient, NY. SCTM# 1000-15-9-8.1. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: kimf@southoldtownny.gov Dated: January 19, 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Kim E. Fuentes 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 �+IiyTIi. E F ,- HEAR1 !iAG The following application will be heard t by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall , 53095 Main Road, Southold : NAME MGH ENTERPRISES INC./VERIZON WIRELESS #7023 MAP # 15 . -9-8 . 1 VARIANCE SETBACK REQUEST CO-LOCATION ON EXISTING WIRELESS FACILITY DATE : THURS , FEB . 2 , 2017 11 : 15 AM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to `he hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . HlRlfmmm Br)APD =Tn%1W1�1 OF ,SOUTHOLD 765 - 1809 i ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: hap://southtown.northfork.net Janurary 9, 2017 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 -Public Notices for Thursday, February 2 , 2017 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of The Suffolk Times. 1) Before January 16th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts,to obtain a mailinq address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of vour ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement or during the hearing, providing the returned letter to us.as soon as possible; AND not later than January 23rd: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon, as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later January 25th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from'the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Posting for receipt by our office before January 31, 2017. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF Ia the Matter of the Application of MAILINGS New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Name of Applicants) SCTM Parcel# f 000=15-9-8 1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK c/o Amato Law Group, PLLC 1, Jennifer Keys residing a1666 Old Country Road, Suite 901, Garden City, New York 11530 New York, being duty sworn,deposes and says that: Oh the 13th day of January , 2017, 1 personatly mailed at the United States Post.Office in,Western Nassau ,New York,by CERTIFIEl7 MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the(X)Assessors,or( ) Courq Real Property Office for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-wa.y of record,surrounding the-applicant's p petty. S'wotn td before me this 16th y of January ,2017 JESSICA KATE ZALIN NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 02ZA6292807 (Notary Pit i Qualified in Nassau County commission Expires November 12,2017 PLEASh list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next -to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. — 4 O ED Z025RIFITT' i Er 1 Er + myPt�e Mg is l Certified Mad Fee Certifed Mad Fee rLi Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee as appropriate) �� N j ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ! "�^®�-.,y J Extra Services&Fees(chack box,add fee as appropriate) i �� y ❑ Return Receipt electronic ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ '`� `r t C3 p( ) $ C ,` Postma�/�Q (' P ark,r ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �^V E3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ,>t c�tMaile I i E3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ � a v ` ❑Certified Restricted Deiivery $ f ❑Adult Signature Required ,� ` j ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ rc. \�� I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ y OPostage _ , ^•4,...�..,.�'^ 11 nJ I 0 Postageru y-Q- Ln a Total Postage an( NYS Office of Par s'Rec�ea'tiorr a NYS Office of Parks, Recreation ` " ✓' Total Postage and LrI Sent To & Historic Preservation u"1 senrro & Historic Preservation a Long Island Region I o Albany, New York 12238 SueitandApt IVc 25 Belmont Avenue 1 r� (� Sfi®e[andApt.No. 6 criysrari;ziRadSCTM#1000-39-1-2.2 West Babylon, New York 11704 crty,srare,"z)P+4° _ SCTM#1000-39-1-2.2 , V.Sy ■ . - bMeSti&'Milif 0171Y Co 117 CID ° =0 ° Certified Mad Fee �y °01 �y � $ertlfled Mad Fee ��F y 717�- , ( pp p ) fy Extra Services$Fees checkbox,add fee es appropriate)' '\� Extra Services&Fees checkbox,add fee as a ro date C _d ❑RrZIeturn Receipt(hardcopy) $ "> '� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ yr c� C ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ s Ostmark E-3 El Return Receipt(electronic) $ PO t lark r ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ �' Here ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ O ❑Adult Signature Required $ �(S ��JQ t- ❑Adult Signature Required $ &� q ere E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ S, ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ 1-3 Postage '' O Postage LrI I u7 Total Postage and s a Total Postage and Plum Island Animal Disease Center Tara Donovan and Robert D. Crawford $ U.S. Department of Homeland Security Ln Sent To 107S.4 th Street Sent Brooklyn, New York 11249 E3 Lgfrie;3tandApt"No P.O. Box 848 o srreerand4pt.ivo., __ ______ Green ort New York 11944 SCTM#1000-15-9-7 tere,ZrP+4a p City State;ZlP+4® SCTM# 1000-15-9-9 :ee :ae ru Er I? )t z k .a i:ri� Gx.x Certified Mad Fee nj $ U� Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee as appropriate)J ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ P;' rye O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 'Postmark 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ yR L, Here 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ I [I Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ N" O Postage � $ _ Total Postage and Norman D. Elsky L-n Sent To 36 Woodcut Drive 11-9 E3 StreitandAjFFMF, Mastic Beach, NY 11951 CiryStati;ZlP+4® SCTM# 1000-15-8-14.2 :OB i Property Owners Adjacent to 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York SCTM # 1000-15-8-14.2 Norman D. Elsky 36 Woodcut Drive Mastic Beach, NY 11951 SCTM # 1000-15-9-7 Tara Donovan and Robert D. Crawford 107S. 4 th Street Brooklyn, New York 11249 SCTM # 1000-15-9-9 Plum Island Animal Disease Center U.S. Department of Homeland Security P.O. Box 848 Greenport, New York 11944 SCTM # 1000-39-1-2.2 NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Long Island Region 625 Belmont Avenue West Babylon, New York 11704 and NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation Albany, New York 12238 A. Si ature 11 Agent ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 1-16-1 7 or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes "NYS Office of Parks, ^ Recreation I If YES,enter delivery address below: QrKo &Historic Preservation Long Island Region I 625 Belmont Avenue West Babylon, New York 11704 SCTM#1000-39-1-2.2 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I IIIIII IIII III I III I I II I I II(IIII IIII II IIII III •Adult Signature ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered '. Mail Restricted Certified Mad@ Delivery ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery Return Receiptfor 9590 9402 2119 6132 9560 78 Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation TM ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label! lad Restricted Delivery 7 ]t 5 15 2 D� `�I 0�1 ' �`1 D o f ail Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 l�,-COMPLETE THIS • e • RVELIVE • • ■ Complete item5l,2,and 3. _l Signature - ❑ nt ■ Print your name and address on the reverse �rao°p ressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received bl"i mfedNarr�e)5, GDate of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, b� }j or on the front if space permits. i 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from (es NYS Office of Parks, Recreation If YES,enterdelive dresslzelovr.' ❑No o & Historic Preservation I Albany, New York 12238 i I SCTM#1000-39-1-2.2 1 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express@ II I IIIIII III II I III I II I I I II II IIII I II II I III ❑Adult Signature Registered MajITM Y ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted Certified Mad@ Delivery ❑Certified Mad Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 9590 9402 2119 6132 9560 61 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery El Signature Confirm 2. Article Number(transfer from service label) [ail ❑Signature confirmation - lad Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 7015 1,520 0001 2744 9017 ,) Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 3811,July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 AMATO LAW GROUP PLLC COUNSELORS AT LAWS � 1 _t� 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR = 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR 516 TEL: SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 ( )227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 January 17, 2017 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility to be located at 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, Suffolk County Tax Map designation District 1000, Section 15,Block 9,Lot 8.1 Hearing Date: February 2,2017 VZW Site Reference: Orient Point 2/Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with Verizon Wireless'Application scheduled for a public hearing on February 2, 2017 before the ZBA, enclosed are the following public notice materials: 1. One (1) Affidavit of Mailings, together with a list of property owners to which the legal notice and site plan were mailed; and 2. Five (5) original Certified Mail Receipts, postmarked January 13, 2017. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your time and attention to this Application. PV t ly yo S, enise J. Vista Enclosures cc: Verizon Wireless (via email, without enclosures) AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR ---------"' SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 TEL:(516)227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 January 26, 2017 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility to be located at 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, Suffolk County Tax Map designation District 1000, Section 15,Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property") Hearing Date: February 2,2017 VZW Site Reference: Orient Point 2/Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with Verizon Wireless'Application scheduled for a public hearing on February 2, 2017, before the ZBA, enclosed please find one (1) Affidavit of Posting, together with two (2) photographs of the Notice of Hearing sign posted at the Property. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your time and attention to this Application. trul ours, enise J. Vista Enclosures cc: Verizon Wireless (via email, without enclosures) 4rl 19 TOWN OF SOUTROLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD,, NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of POSTING New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Name of Applicants) Regarding-Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as SCTM Parcel#I000-15-9-8 1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) - I,Daniel Falasco residing.at 94 Steuben Blvd.,• Nesconset ,New York,being duly sworn,depose and say, that: On the day of Janom ,20U ,thpersonally planed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and•nature of ,,application noted thereon, " t bove-refer nc se;,-=Iy upon propet y, orated ten(I0) feet or closer from the street or.right-of- way(driveway entrance)—facing the street or facing each street or right-of--way entrance,* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained•in place for seven(7)days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be February 2, 2017. (Signature) Swoin to before me this 26�` Day of January ; 2017 JESSICA KATE ZALIN NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 02ZA6292807 Auallfled In Nassau County (Notary Public) My Commission Expires November 12,2017 near the entrance or driveway entrance ofth pr per�y�as the area most visible to passerby. U�\ s 3 t 1y y F�•uia �_ �� � r 14 i e f 0 � Ilk � a � �� -r•IL��_y� �� � � t #1 "� 4 y I ya. t J a r ,•4" Y � y NOTICE OF HEARING Tho following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road. Southold: NAME NIGH ENTERPRISES INC.iV'ERIZON WIRELESS #7023 VARIANCE SiETC AC,K � A REQUES"1- CO-LOCATION ON EXISTING - WIRELESS FACILITY DATE: TH U RSi,FES. 2, 2017 11:15 AIVI It vnu arc Infar€aateci in thitl Project, yott 11my coview tltr- ItI for to Me hearing durimi normal h►tsitiess days betwecn 8 ANI mid 3 13m, r ON1NG BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 7615-1809 s t It v� ,ayf y Tom."='�. •. n e _ K s �4 r AMATO LAW GROUP, PLLC COUNSELORS AT LAW 666 OLD COUNTRY ROAD 9TH FLOOR 405 LEXINGTON AVE GARDEN CITY,NEW YORK 11530 402 MAIN ST. CHRYSLER BLDG,26TH FLR ------------- SUITE 204 NEW YORK,N.Y.10174 TEL:(516)227-6363 METUCHEN,NJ 08840 TEL:(212)485-6000 FAX:(516)227-6367 TEL:(732)317-1511 FAX:(212)485-6001 FAX:(732)317-1513 January 31, 2017 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building 54375 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Area Variance Application (the "Application") by New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") in connection with the proposed public utility wireless communication facility to be located at 40200 Main Road, Orient, New York, Suffolk County Tax Map designation District 1000, Section 15, Block 9, Lot 8.1 (the "Property") Hearing Date: February 2, 2017 VZW Site Reference: Orient Point 2 /Our File No. 100-0773 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with Verizon Wireless'Application scheduled for a public hearing on February 2,2017,before the ZBA,enclosed please find two(2)green Return Receipt signature cards. Please note that the remaining three (3) Return Receipt cards have not been returned to this office. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your time and attention to this Application. V truly yours, Denise J. Vista Enclosures #13141 STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the,annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successfully commencing on the 26th day of January, 2017. 74 Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of 2017. CHRISTINA VOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01V06105050 Qualified In Suffolk County My comallmoo 0xpl1es February 28,2020 63735 Suffolk County"Rout 4$,(Adj:' ..,jpisapproval based on an application for - Request for a Variance under Article the Long Island Sound)"C*riee poit,'1kJY iiiapermit to collocate a wireless communi- X)M,Section 280-116A;and the•j3uild- SCTM#1000-401-20.2. cations facility on subject property at:1) ing Inspector's Ngyember 162016,Notice LEGAL NOTICE 10:15 A.M.-BRUCE ANA BEONek less than the code required minimum side of Disapproval based on an•applicatiiih`' SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING. GOODHEART#7019 - Request for a yard setback of 25 feet;located,at:40200 for a permit to construct additions and BOARD OF APPEALS Variance under Article XXIII, Section NYS Route 25,(Adj.to Gardeners Bay) alterations to an existing single family THURSDAY,February 2,2017 280-124 and the Building Inspector's Sep- Orient,NY.SCTM#1000-15-9-8.1. dwelling at: 1) proposed additions and PUBLIC HEARINGS ' tember 29,2016„Notice of Disapproyal 1:00 P.M.-WILLIAM GREMLER• alterations located less than the code NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pur- based on an application for a peril»t to JR.AND MICHAEL MURPHY#7025, required 100 feet from the top of the suant to Section 267 of the Town Law and construct additions and alterations to -Request for a Waiver of Mergerpetition bluff;located,at:555 Soundview Avenue, Town Code Chapter 280(Zoning),Town an existing single family dwelling,at:1) under Article IT,Section 280-10A,to un- (Adj.to LonOsland Sound)Orient,, of Southold,the following public hearings the proposed additions and alteration merge land identified'as SCTM No.1QQ SCTM#1000-15-3,7. will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN is less than the code required side yard 41-1-30,which has merged with'SCTM 1-45 P.M."= TOWN OF'SOUTH- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at minimum setback of 10 feet; located, No.100041-1-24,based on the Building OLD PLANNING BOARD/SURREY the Town Hall,53095 Main Road,P.O. at: 350 Second Avenue, Peconic, NY. Inspector's September 29, 2016 Notice ,LANE VINEYARDS#7039-The South- Box 1179,Southold,New York 11971- SCTM#1000.674-24. of Disapproval,which states that a tion- old Town Planning Board has requested 0959,on THURSDAY FEBRUARY 2, 10-A,5 A,K-SUS•ANNAU MCDOW- conforming lot shall'merge with as adja- that the Southold Town ZoningzBoard 2017. ELL#7021-•Requ6st fora Variance rin- cent conforming or non-conforming,lot of Appeals make an interpretation,pur- 9:30 A.M.-DORIE AND ARI PAP- der Article III, Section 280-15„Article held in common ownership with the-first suant to Article IH,'Section 280-13 A(4) ARO #7020 - Request fora Variance 3=,Section 280-124;and the Build= lot at any time after July,1,1983 and that of the Southold Town Code and Plan- under Article III,Section 280-15 and the ing Inspector's O,ctgber 26,2016,Notice non-conforming lots slialfineige ugtil the niug Board-Memorandum dated January Building Inspector's November-A,2016 of Disapproval based on an application total lot size conforms to the current bulk 3,2017,to request a code interpretation Notice of Disapproval based on an appli, for a permit to demolish and reconstruct schedule requirements(minimum 40,000 'as.to,whetheritheproposed site.plan for cation for a permit to construct an acces- an existing non-conforming accessory sq.ft.in the R40 Residential Zoning Dis- Surrey Lane Vineyards can be cpnsidered sory in-ground swimming pool,at:1)lo- garage at:1)1ess,than tha•code.required trict);located,at;980WashingtottAve�tue, a wineryand a,pprntitted use and to de- cated in other than the code required-rear ttiinimiun front yard setback.of'40,f"eet,2) Greenport,NY"SCTM N6s.16M 41,'1`24• ` termine what.activities must take place yard;located,at:6182 Soundview Avenue, less than the code required side yard set-, and 100041-1-30. in order to constitute"wine production." Peconic,NY.SCTM#1000-59-8=5.8. back of 10 feet;located,at:•180 Strohson 1:15 P.M.- CAPTAIN-RED'S-MA- The Planning Board further requests 9A5 A.M. - JAMES HUETTEN- Road,(Adj.to the Sheep Pen Channel) RINE SALES.INC.#7014-Request for the Zoning Board of Appeals to pro- MOSER#7024-Request for a Variance Cutchogue,NY.SCTM#1000-103-10-17. Variance(s) under Article JAI, Section vide an interpretation of"wine tastings" under Article XXIII, Section 280-124; 11:00 A.M. - ALBERT LEUTWY 28049;Article XVII;,Section 2$Q-78(1);•. and"wine tasting rooms"relative to the and the Building Inspector's November LER#7022-Request for a Variance un- and the Building Trispecfor's September poposecj site plan for Surrey Lane,Vine 9 2016, Amended November 23, 2016 der Article XXIU,Section 280-124;and 19,1201(i,amended September'30,2016, yards,-located at:46975 Route 25(Main Notice of Disapproval based on an appli- the Building Inspector's November 21, Notice of Disapproval based on an appli- Road),Southold,NY.SCTM#1000-69-1- cation for a permit to construct additions 2016,Notice of Disapproval based on an cation for a building permit to construct 18.1&69-1-18.6. and alterations to an existing single fam- application-for a permit to oonstruci addi- a storage building and to propose boat The Board of Appeals will hear all fly dwelling at:1)less than the code re- tions and alteration's to an existing single storage and parking,at:1)the proposed persons or their representatives, desfr- quired minimum front yard setback of 35 "family dwelling at:1)less than the code building is less than the code required ing to be heard at each hearing,and/or feet;located,at:65 Bayview Drive,East required minimum front yard setback front yard minimum setback of 100 feet; desiring to submit written statements Marion,NY.SCTM#1000-37-1-1. of 35 feet,2)less than the code required 2)the proposed building'is less than the before the conclusion of each hearing. 10:00 A.M.- KENNETH ZAHLER minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet; code.Mpired zside yard minimum,set- Each hearing,will not start earlier than 47011 - Request for a Variance under located,at:;457.3 Wickham Avenue,.(Adj- ,back"of.25 feet;3)no off-street-parking designated above. Files are available for Article XXII, Section 280-105 and the, 'to;Long•Creek)Mattituck,•NY.S # spaces'shall be locatedbto any residence review during regular business hours and Building Inspector's October••14; 2016, 1000-107= -5. `"" - district unless the use to which they,are prior to the day of the hearing. If you Notice of Disapproval based on an,ap- 11:15 AX.-MGH ENTERPRISES accessory is permitted in such district or have questions,please contact our office plication to legalize an"as built fence, INC..VERIZON -WIRELESS #7023 - upon approval of the Board of Appeals; at,(631)765-1809,or by email:KimFCa? at: 1) more than the code•required Request for.a Variance under Article located,at:9605 Route 25,Mattituck,NY. southoldtownny.gov maximum four (4) feet in'heigbt'when XIII, Section 280-56; and the Building SCTM#1000-122-6-12. Dated:January 19,2017 located in the front yard; located, at: Inspector's October 18,2016 Notice of 1:30 P.M.-ARETI LAVALLE#7026 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON BY.Kim R.Fuentes 54375 Main Road(Office Location) 53095 Main Road(Mailing/USPS) P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 13141-1T 1/26 BOARD MEMBERS OF SOU, Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� , ®�® 53095 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �� �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider IyCQUNTI Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS D E C E u U E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DEC 0 7 2016 Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 Southold Town December 7, 2016 Planning Board Mark Terry,Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref.No. #7023 —MGH Enterprises Inc./Verizon Wireless Dear Mr. Terry: We have received an application for co-location on an existing wireless facility in Orient. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson By�S Encls. / t t Office Location: QF SO�jyol Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank ~ 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 • Q Southold,NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork-.net D E BOARD OF APPEALS L, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DEC 0 Z 2016 Tel. (631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 Southold—Town - Planning Board MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson DATE: December 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA#7023 — MGH Enterprises Inc./Verizon Wireless The ZBA is reviewing the following application, and enclosed copies of, ZBA application, and latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 280 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. , NAME TAX#/ ZBA HEARING VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED MGH 15-9-8.1 #7023 2/2/17 Art. XIII Sec 12/7/16 WFC ENTERPRISES MII Zone 280-56 Architects INC./VERIZON WIRELESS Your comments are appreciated by one week prior to above hearing date. Thank you. Encls. BOARD MEMBERS OF SO Uj Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� �Q�® 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantescs Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Q Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �O ® �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider CQ� y,e Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 December 7, 2016 Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Lansdale: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: ZBA File #7023 Owner/Applicant: MGH Enterprises Inc./Verizon Wireless Action Requested: Co-location on an existing wireless facility— setback Within 500 feet of: (X) State or County Road (X) Waterway (Bay,, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing-or Proposed County, State, Federal land. ( ) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson By: Encls. BOARD MEMBERS OF SO(/� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson �� yp 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantesc Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning �O ® i0 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider l��'OU � Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 February 21,2017 Denise Vista,Esq, Amato Law Group,PLLC 666 Old Country Road, Suite 901 Garden City,NY 11530 RE: ZBA Appeal No. 7023 MGH Enterprises,Verizon Wireless SCTM No. 1000-15-9-8.1 Dear Applicant; Transmitted for your records is a copy of the Board's February 16, 2017 Findings, Deliberations and Determination,the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above variance application. Before commencing any construction activities, a building permit is necessary. Please be sure to submit an application along with a copy of the attached determination to the Building Department. If you have any questions,please call the office. Sincer ly, Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant Encl. cc: Building Dept. pcq N on ay �{ to el 12 i 3 i to z t SAl 1.1 1.4w 1,5 W MAt4 16{� �� A '•� 11µa1 � v'� -_ 4-_i >o~ w CAI 46 lb in 121 _ MI 47 44 PI 1 �.� / 41 42 2 Zp 1w on 124; 4 s w w w15 9 .s y �n w. OY 1 T S w 00 04 t $ 129 Ilu Br 10 an nng b It on X14 u q 1.1s btra A 1 21 S rn 11 P1 ;� N' t on 34.0dy 1 to wl 126 110 m b 10 yb an 4, > wn 4 127 o+ol 247 b 0 i In? 117 V,TH�'� � 240 2417 a b 1l s an �Ait` _ t n :b u.01A6 7 nw b {°t q �P 1.16 t t6 a t to 112 24.16 two 24.19 9 29 p a M Irl 1. ew 12A a owl "' a an t- (+9 N a P l6 s Z1. 4 d oA <r t0 117 'L' 34 4 Iw 1dA 151 al ma 24.16 P 144 1 114 ° ' 1tµ 9 2420 1 � g I2A ` ++ // zt 1J s42s 15µc1 "4,S 2429 g 5�,�6 ��� `' ` ti.' d jl►' �J 2127 CIA 2426 = O pro 9 µ4µc1 9p}S.�n r•• `�J p p nrn 2470SAN \ I •' / s 01MOF • ` \NEw'oaX Il , g s Jdb R 53 j a Ak/ M TOMEW sourdow SECTION NO NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © e VAIM NAINTEWACE AMPATICK ME OR Real Property Tax Service Agency Y nE Wy,1y0f 15 UUMUTION OF AWPONf10R OF TIE a qty Centor RMrtwed,N Y 11001 M ole UFFOUI COOM TAX YAP It P1pHdTEO 4 7ulEINFEET A {b W11gUTWOTIEN PF11Mb1410NOFTME >m 0 foo P ® 01lllln:T NO 1000 PROPERTY MAP feA ® , ww w1eFut'i rAx�F wnuancw=r