Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6914 a � A � 6 CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED ( ) Tape this form toot 0 0 4o a �, c. o ( ) Pull ZBA copy of ND �! ( ) Check file boxes fo 0 ( ) Assign next numbe outside of file folder m ° -°0 0 w o o m ( ) Date stamp entire c a 5"o h 03 -a �' 0z .7 G . . n X o O file number w-X --4 � o ms ( } Hole punch entire o z W N N Cn C.7) (before sending to T. � cn ' ( j Create new index caW CO ( } Print contact info & -9s; N Prepare transmittal( ) Prep 1 - ( .) Send original applica to Town Clerk [ ) Note inside file folder and tape to inside of O Copy County Tax Ma! Neighbors and AG to ' rnCO � [ ) Make 7 copies and pl ! ( ) Qo mailing label ! lam ' togs -�es Office Location: o�%®F ®UJMailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank t" �.,-„ " g 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 �Q Souti':old,1`.Y 11971-0959 l�C®UNT4,� http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765.1809 Fax(631)765-9064 COVER SHEET WITH ZBA FILE STATUS OF FILE / ZBA Name : 9,3 c>0 4P,-4, ,2T- 1 d1 C �sP�`�'� &SI) Tax Map #: !an, 1 a Q-7-7 Location : 30-D r--f" '�sr [ ] Refund issued : CANNOT activate or reactivate file (Applicant has withdrawn application). [ ] NO REFUND DUE, based on time spent for Town to process application and hearings. [ )d. ] Obsolete & expired; CANNOT reactivate this file: NEW APPLICATION NECESSARY: Extensive time has passed; Zoning Code changes are now in effect and this application expired. NOTE: Applicant may apply for a new application with Building Inspector for a new Notice of Disapproval and submit NEW application with all documents and current maps to ZBA, or modify plan to conform to the current code. This Town file based on applicant's previous year requests has expired. [ ] No forms to be scanned; FILE # VOID: APPLICATION RETURNED. (All forms were returned to applicant early in process, as requested by applicant.) ----------------7----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i BOARD MEMBERS ®F S19 Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson O�� y�. 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 4 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer G Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning '�pl • �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider 'YIrou Ti, Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631) 765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 December 8, 2016 Paul Pawlowski P.O. Box 783 Mattituck,NY 11952 RE: 9300 Route 25, Inc. SCTM No. 1000-122-7-9 Special Exception#6914 Dear Mr. Pawlowski: I am writing with regard to the above-referenced application for a Special Exception to allow a Membership Club in the R-80 zoning district. As you are aware,the Zoning Board of Appeals, in response to the Planning Board's request for a code interpretation;determined that the use as applied for in the above-referenced application does not meet the definition of a Membership Club under the Town Code. As a result the application for a special exception has been rendered moot. Therefore,the Board considers the matter closed. As indicated in the decision, you have either option of pursuing a special exception permit for an application that meets the definition of a"Membership Club," or pursuing a change of zone to a zoning district thatwillallow the proposed use. If you have any questions, or require our assistance,please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very ly yot rs, Kim E. Fuentes Board Assistant 1 e 1 Is �uttowd o� I Kale p b r \� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Ire RECENED J JAN n 94016 \D,� - APPEALS ZONING BOARD OF Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE - Department of Economic Development and'Planning Joanne Minieri Division of Planning Deputy County Executive and Commissioner and Environment January, 11, 2016 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Attn: Leslie Weisman Dear Ms. Weisman: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 thru A 14-25 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application submitted to the,Suffolk County Planning Commission is to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant Municipal File Number Pawloski,Paul #6914 Israel, Richard&Lisa #6917 Island Estate Group,LLC #6918 .__ Wexler,Donna #6920 Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning Theodore R. Klein Senior Planner TRK/cd H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 (631)853-5191 OFFICE LOCATION: ivIAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex �°�®� S®���® P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 �® �® Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) \� Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov COU RECEIVED PLANNING BOARD OFFICE JAN 2 8 2016 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Donald J. Wilcenski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Date: January 25, 2016 Re: Request for Planning Comments for ZBA#6914 Sports East Fitness Club Located at 9300 Route 25, ±141's/w/o Sigsbee Road & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 The Planning Board has reviewed the Special Exception Application referenced above. As you are aware, the standards that the Zoning Board of Appeals considers for Special Exception uses, as outlined in Sections §280-142 and §280-143 of the Southold Town Code, relate to assessment of traffic and pedestrian safety, and potential impacts to natural resources, community character, and quality of life.-All of these issues are examined in the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process which the Planning Board will be conducting as part of the Site Plan review. The Planning Board has received a partial Site Plan Application and is prepared to make preliminary comments; however, the review of the applications should be concurrent. It is recommended that the SEQR analysis on this Site Plan be coordinated with the Zoning Board of Appeals as an involved agency to benefit the applicant. We reviewed the proposal for its consistency with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. Upon reviewing the draft Parks and Recreation Chapter completed as part of the Town's ongoing Comprehensive Plan Update, the Planning Board found that there was strong support for a facility of this type to be located somewhere in the Town. An online survey was conducted regarding citizen support for added recreation facilities and 80% responded that an indoor swimming pool was a top priority. In addition, Goal 2.2 of this 0�3 RECEIVED Sports East Fitness Club _ - Page 2 of 3SAN ���® " January 25, 2016 �1 jq draft chapter contains an objective to research howo attrac�or create a sports complex that includes an indoor swimming pool and recognizes that this would require private funding to accomplish. The draft Parks and Recreation Chapter referenced above includes an objective in Goal 2.2 that notes an overuse of the playing fields already existing in Southold Town and calls for the creation of more soccer fields. The subject application includes two soccer fields. Also, Goal 4 of the chapter is to initiate a town-wide wellness campaign to improve physical and mental health. Adding opportunities like the proposed sports complex is consistent with this goal. Although this is a draft of a future comprehensive plan that has not yet been adopted by the Town Board, there was considerable public input that was favorable to the goals. Another indication of whether a proposed development is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan is how it fits into the current zoning. In this case, the use is considered by the Town's Building Department as fitting under the Special Exception section of 280-13 B as a membership club. Under that section of the zoning code, the use must meet certain conditions, all of which the Building Department found to be met as indicated by the Notice of Disapproval, dated December 12, 2015, which makes no mention of any variances required. The use exceeds, or is able to exceed all the requirements in the Town Code for such a facility, including the minimum property size and setbacks. Although the proposed project initially appears to be consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan, it is a large project for this town, and potential adverse impacts relating to the development and operation of this site must be examined to ensure they do not degrade the health, safety and welfare of the residents and neighbors. Potential adverse impacts, including but not limited to, traffic, noise and groundwater pollution must be investigated to determine their significance, and whether additional steps can be taken to mitigate or remove the impacts entirely. A Traffic Impact Study will provide information about the amount and intensity of traffic the site will generate and whether there is any way to mitigate traffic impacts. Creating turning lanes to alleviate backups on Route 25 is one common traffic mitigation strategy. It appears that the right-of-way width for Route 25 at this location is wide enough to accommodate turning lanes; however, this is an issue that would need to be reviewed by the New York State Department of Transportation. Noise can often be mitigated by distance and screening. The large size of the parcel will allow for setbacks that are much larger than the code requires and maximizing the distances to existing residences may provide mitigation to noise impacts. Potential groundwater pollution from septic system wastewater could be mitigated through advanced wastewater treatment systems now available and permitted by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As mentioned above, the SEQR analysis will accomplish this investigation into the potential adverse impacts. Coordinating the SEQR review amongst the permitting Sports East Fitness Club - Page 3 of 3 January 25, 2016 agencies, with the Planning Board respectfully requesting Lead Agency, is recommended. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this department. RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2096 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS V0 303 t nR RECEIvED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DEC 14 Z0�5 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW-YORK Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765=9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION ®AR® ®� APPEALS Application o. Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK: Applicant(s),/wG /J���r� , of Parcel Location: House No.Jno Street A�W- o�2 Hamlet Contact phone numbers: ele ;F-/ SCTM 1000 Section •/2� Block 7 Lot(s) Lot Size.�10191 Zone District Z' hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with �/�"� SUBSECTION the ZONING ORDINANCE,ARTICLE— , for the following uses and purposes: '�) '?'0 �) as shown on the attached survey/site plan drawn to scale.Site Plan review[ ]IS or[ ]IS NOT required. A. Statement of Ownership and Interest: �,f.�c/y�-r.✓s is(are)the owner(s)of property known and referred to as (Rause No.,Street,Hamlet identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000,Section Z Block ,Lot""— ,and shown on the attached deed. The above-described property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefore in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: C. The property which is subject of this application is zoned oocl) and[ ] is consistent with the use(s)described in the CO(att opy),or [ ]is not consistent with the CO being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): �u�� V'& - [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: STATE OF NEW YORK) (Signatur Sworn to before me this 14 day of, ,20 \t�l� (Notary Public) VICKI TOTH Notary Public StatQ of New York No.01W316190696 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires July 28,20ib RECEIVED DEC 14 2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK BARD OF APPEALS Phone(631)765-1809 (631)765-9064 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: Page 2 General Standards,please answer the following as it pertains to your project: A. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: <4=e- B. The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts BECAUSE: C. The safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location BECAUSE: D-Tlre-use-will-be-in-harmony-with-and-promote-the-general-purposes-and-intent of-Chapter — 280-142 BECAUSE E. The use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility,scale and overall appearance BECAUSE: F. All proposed structures, equipment, and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection BECAUSE: /de //,t G. The proposal shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 236, Stormwater Management BECAUSE: toc/,e cri iG G a etc ' RECEIVED DEC 14 2015 A. BOARD OF APPEALS With the proposed used of a Health,Fitness and Sports Club we feel that is will not prevent the orderly use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts because we will take into consideration when working with the planning dept.that we exceed the non disturbance buffers zones as our proposed set backs more the double the setbacks needed by code. The main sports etc will be inside verse outside so that the nearby uses will not hear or be bothered by the proposed use. The sport fields that are outside will be closest to the main road verses near the residential properties'. We area that we are proposing is mainly used as a commercial use now as it is on the main road in the main hamlet of Mattituck B. Because we feel that since it is an indoor use mainly that we will not prevent the orderly use or the legal use of the use districts, we will work with the planning board to make sure all parking areas, entrances,setbacks,landscaping etc are done to the best of our ability. This is a large piece of property and we will protect the neighboring properties from noise and make sure that the private use of the club is within the current code with special exception C. Because what we are proposing will not affect the safety of the location and its current use, we will ensure proper traffic flow,parking,lighting and means of egress. We feel this will enhance the welfare of the community and the uses as this town needs a health club,and sports facility. As a comfort level and convenience.The indoor nature of this project will protect from noise,the landscaping with protect the scenic view and the site plan will allow for the best use of this property as proposed D. Because we feel that a health club is residential by nature and,this will be used for recreational use only by our town residents. E. Because we will protect the visibility by keeping all large mature trees surrounding the property and including along the main road, the scale is better then is we were to build this out with residential houses,and the appearance will be keeping with a north fork feel. We will be keeping all mature trees surrounding the property to protect the scenic view for every neighbor,we will improve the landscaping and we will disturb much less with what we are proposing then the alternative of a major subdivision 14 RECEIVED DEC 14 2015�� l To: Zoning Board ®p® ()F APPEAL Applicant: Paul Pawlowski"Sports East" Re: Property Location 9300 Main Road Mattituck Date: 12/10/15 Dear Zoning Board, I would like to apply for a special exception for property location 9300 Main Road in Mattituck.The special exception I am asking for is for an Athletic Club. Please note that the athletic club will be a membership-based sports club.This will be an indoor and outdoor sports club.The main sports we would like to propose are:tennis,soccer,pickle ball,indoor swimming pool,indoor basketball,indoor physical fitness activates. Our desire is to first receive this special exception,and then work closely with the planning board to ensure the site plan is the best it can be. I realize you have a lot to consider when rendering your decisions. Please know that we feel strongly that the very core of this proposal is in the best interest of our community as a whole,and we will work hard with the planning board to protect and buffer the immediate neighbors as well.This type of facility requires a sizable piece of property in order to have enough parking,enough flow for health dept.needs and also enough space to ensure that the project protects and improves the scenic view for all neighbors and residents. Aside from the special exception,what we are proposing will not require any variances. Our proposal will meet all parking requirements and setbacks required by code,and will more than triple the side yard setback requirements.We will also be able to meet every code requirement for septic and storm water runoff.Not only will we meet the code requirements,we will also preserve more then 50% of the property with our proposal. We will work with the DOT to ensure we address any traffic concerns that may arise.When it comes to traffic concerns,this property is adjacent to the widest part of the Main Road in all of Southold Town,and we know that proper turning lanes can be installed.With this type of use,we can also keep all existing trees along the Main Road and on all four sides of the property,as this is a destination for local members verses a business needing road exposure. I would like to point out a few things that we have taken into consideration in our sketch plan: 1. The majority of our activities will be indoors-there will not be a noise concern for neighbors and residents.Any outside activities will be located closest to the main road for noise purposes so that residential neighbors are not affected. I I i 2. We are proposing to keep the large existing trees on the site and have the non- disturbance buffers more then triple the code.The building will not be visible from all four sides,and we will add landscaping as needed to make sure that this goal is achieved. 3. Parking and Traffic-The parking will be adequate and will meet all code requirements.We can also add turning lanes and potentially a'right turn only'for traffic leaving the site heading east.We will work closely with planning and DOT on this-we have the ability to make this work for the proximity the project is proposed. 4. The outdoor synthetic sports field will be the first of its kind here on the North Fork. If allowed by the district and town,we will permit local schools to use this when needed for no charge. S. In the Master Plan the planning board has been working on, I feel one of the main components missing in our town is a sports facility. 6. Bonding-My partners and I understand this is a large project for our town,and we are more than willing to bond the project so that it is completed with no issues at all. I do understand the possibility that some might be concerned about the effects this project may have on our community. I truly believe we have made that a top priority. I pledge that we will make every effort to become an integral part of the community and provide a facility that Mattituck/Southold Town will be proud of.I know the amazing and positive impact sports can have not only on individual students and participants,but also on the community at large. Through sport education,we can teach our young athletes the importance of dedication, hard work,teamwork,respect,fitness,healthy living habits and many more valuable life skills. For the adult and senior members of our community,we plan to offer many activities that promote good health and fitness with activities that include swimming,running,tennis, volleyball,pickle ball,and many others as we grow along with the community.We are inspired to create a place where families can come together to exercise and participate in various activities and sports in a wonderfully welcoming environment. I respect the role of the ZBA,and I feel what we are proposing is in the best interest of our community and the very best use for this property.I look forward to working with you and bqtq answering any questions and concerns you may have. Regards, DEC 14 2015 Paul Pawlowski 50 Peg® ®f APPEALS >'W O� F- U �a =0 M0P,1140P,114ROAD (Rp0� 2 5) PQ Q. RILEY �QO AVENUE W J4, o z o g �2 � W e It r W Z m J 0e PARCEL V)_ y y DR N/ 25� ®N/° 141.34' Q R 1'.{ SIGN �j. 0" 1 �O 1 600'(36 0� H°x O �N�N BARTLEY R PLACE �N Y �ko ,FFtc NIR �o ROAD �P,N 'iY2 I 1p5j0� £ I I PECONIC AY BOULEVARD h�g ° ON WIRES I SECTION 143 ORHEpO BLOCK 1 LOT 1 m KEY MAP ON I_ N.T.S. T REPUTED OWNER: (VIS .1900,. E OH SMEPVA E MAY & TONY INC. N 53 pH H stGN P EX/SANG WOODS ' I\r ° i TO REMAIN )LC H SIGN 1.1 E / o - - � ' I 330' III I SECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 4.1 I REPUTED OWNER: MARGARET NOONE I 990 • ' 59' I - - SECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 5 REPUTED OWNER: DEBRA TIMPONE m sF SECTION 143 CR BLOCK 1 LOT 6 to REPUTED OWNER: II Cl ALFRED CILETTI JR. N IT - T o - - I II 300' BLOCK 1OINLOT 7 REPUTED OWNER: ABRAHAM GARCIA & 0*0 I I 8 8 SHARON RODRIGUEZ r- I I II ASPHALT PARK/NG AREA U19 111111 1 1.711111 1 19 SECTION 143 11111 BLOCK 1 LOT 8 19I 17sFFM I I I 19 REPUTED OWNER: JAMES HINES I n I 8 f0 19 150' i SECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 9 1 REPUTED OWNER: DOREEN SIDOR EX/SANG WOODS TO REMAIN I SECTION 143 BLOCK 1 LOT 10 REPUTED OWNER: PROPOSED SOURAVLIS & ANNA HRISGVALANTIS I BUILDING I Q U I 75,000 SF FOOTPR/NT J 7,500 SF 2ND STORY MEZZANINE 82,500 SF GFA d W J Q: SECTION 143 U EX/SANG WOODS I BLOCK 1 LOT 11 Q rn I TO REMAIN I r- 0 0 c e REPUTED OWNER: � U MARY BERNINGER O OJ O 3 Q SITE DATA 0 I < Q I I SECTION 144 p LOT AREA ........................................ 20.82 ACRES BLOCK 1 LOT 1 w CURRENT ZONING ............................ R-80 (RESIDENCE) Z d w REPUTED OWNER: W J. MORENO CURRENT USE VACANT PROPOSED USE ............................... RECREATION SECTION 144 PAPKM CAL.CL LATION BLOCK 1 LOT 2 REPUTED OWNER: PARKING REQUIRED: RECREATION FACILITY. JOHN AND 1 SPACE PER 300 SF GFA MARGARET TONER 5 SPACES PER COURT 1 SPACE PER 200 SF GFA OF RINK AREA RESTAURANT. 15 I 1 SPACE PER 100 SF GFA OR 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS W SECTION 144 tr) t BLOCK 1 LOT 3 (4) TENNIS COURTS 28,800 SF: 20 SPACES 0) 0 REPUTED OWNER: (1) BASKETBALL COURT 5,050 SF: 5 SPACES to P JOHN AND 32 SEAT CAFE 1,200 SF: 12 SPACES 234' 194' C? I O MARY FETZKO REMAINING BLDG: 82,500 SF-28,800 SF-5,050 SF-1,200 SF = 47,450 SF N 47,450 SF (1 SPACE/300 SF GFA) = 159 SPACES 8 1 (n PARKING REQUIRED: 196 STANDARD SPACES 180' GRAVEL PARK/NG AREA PARKING PROPOSED: 224 STANDARD SPACES SECTION 144 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 ALL STALLS MINIMUM 9'x19' WITH 24' WIDE AISLES (22' MIN.) REPUTED OWNER: FELIX AND QTY CALMLATION O LINDA MULE O GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV, 600 GPD/ACRE N — _ ALLOWABLE FLOW: 20.8211 ACRES X 600 GPD/ACRE = 12,492.66 GPD N I SECTION 144 PROPOSED FLOW. (RECREATION) 15 GPD/PARKING SPACE BLOCK 1 LOT 5.2 Z I I TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW: 224 SPACES X 15 GPD/SPACE = 3,360 GPD I REPUTED OWNER: HOPE HERGRUETER EX/S77NG WOODS — — APPLICANT: TO REMAIN PAUL PA WLO WSKI P.O. BOX 783 I SECTION 144 MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 I BLOCK 1 LOT 6.2 A REPUTED OWNER: ZA J. SARNO 12/23/15 AS BU/LD/NG RE14S/ON SECTION 144 Date By Revision BLOCK 1 LOT 7 Surveyed by: P.F. Drafted by: A.V.R. Checked by: M.A.R. REPUTED OWNER: Ba rrett ELIZABETH CITTI SECTION 144 -: Bonacci & BLOCK 1 LOT 8 REPUTED OWNER: Van V V eele, PC I I JAMES & VERA TAHENY — — Civil Engineers 175A Commerce Dr. Surveyors Hauppauge, NY 11788 SECTION 144 T 631 .435.1111 BLOCK I LOT 9 Planners F 631 .435.1022 a REPUTED OWNER: www.bbvpc.com 3 I ELIZABETH CASSIDY Tax Map No.: DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 122 BLOCK 7 LOT 9 Certifications indicated hereon signify that this plat 3 ` � p — — of the property depicted hereon was made in 9300 ROUTE 25 S 69.31' 0" W 577.6$' accordance with the existing Code of Practice for SECTION 144 Land Surveyors adopted by the New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors. This TAX LOT 8.9 I BLOCK 1 LOT 10 certification is only for the lands depicted hereon [AU �E and is not certification of title,zoning of freedom REPUTED OWNER: MEGA STYLE LLC I REPUTED OWNER: of encumbrances. Said certifications shall run PAUL RENNER & only to the persons and/or entities listed hereon N I MAUREEN ROCHE and are not transferable to additional persons, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLKCOUNTY N.Y. entities or subsequent owners. i c a Uha��rhorizPd alteration or addition to this survey SKETCH is a violation of Section 7209 of New York Q State Education Law PLAN Copies of this survey map not bearing the land surveyor's embossed seal and signature shall a not be considered to be a true and valid copy © 2015 BBV PC N The offsets or dimensions shown from structures to the property lines are for a specific purpose and use,and therefore,are not intended to guide in the erection of LM: fences,retaining walls,pools,patios,planting areas,additions to buildings and any other construction. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined Date Scale Project No. Sheet No. O gVIEW: or considered as a port of this survey.Easements,Rights-of-Way of record, if any,are not shown.Property corner monuments were not placed as a part of this survey. NOVEMBER 16, 2015 1" = 60' A140502 3 0 N O o� V g 0 Y (-09 9l f; 4 Z9 5 BOARD of *, PEALS \o �E 25, 1 141.34' Q ON SIGN Q PAVEMENT NYS ROv O P o 600.96 NtROL 00)( 4.8'W O C �PFFtG CO 5 IGN I I ° ON RE/ W SECTION 143 W O RNEpO M BLOCK 1 LOT 1 m ON N REPUTED OWNER: oQM pN �EPHO E o MAY & TONY INC. 53. � v/ NOVA ON SIGN I G N oN st MONUMENT — — FOUND w F /p I QU 0.3'E 1 Y I p w FE ON / MONUMENT j I to LINE FOUND i I 0.4'N I I ( + I I I SECTION 143 1 I BLOCK 1 LOT 4.1 II I 1 3 { REPUTED OWNER: I ( { 1 W MARGARET NOONE { t � { t II I i I I i 4 t t t t i I SECTION 143 { t ; o BLOCK 1 LOT 5 ` 1 41 t2o' V)z I U I ow REPUTED OWNER: I i CSHED DEBRA TIMPONE I `2.2'E I 0.2'E SHED ! I J 0.5'E � I J J ° 0m r t Z et SECTION 143 j FE IU- 00 BLOCK 1 LOT 6 J r 8.t'w a N In REPUTED OWNER: II I i t tID ALFRED CILETTI JR. 0 (n I I °FEa I IN — — f I 3F LINE 4'E t { 1 CONC. t { 4.NC BLDG. t is SECTION 143 t o ` f34' BLOCK 1 LOT 7 il I t REPUTED OWNER: 00 I I i +t CONC ABRAHAM GARCIA & �} 0.9'w z SHARON RODRIGUEZ CONC ON O I *52' LINE m I t I I ( FE\ I 1 1 5.7'E U I SECTION 143 I f BLOCK 1 LOT 8 1 t I I REPUTED JA AMES HI ES I t \\ I MONUMENT 1 \ \ FOUND WALL 1 \ \ 0.6'W I \\ \\ FE — I \ \\ 0.7'W 1 \ w t \ \\ z \\\ \\\ s Wa pv SECTION 143 \ \\ BLOCK 1 LOT 9 �1 I \\\\\\\\ ® REPUTED OWNER: i \ \\ WELL/PIPE DOREEN SIDOR I a I \\ \\ lot \ \ t f E \\ \l MONUMENT 111111 — — + I \ \\ FOUND i \ t t \\ \\\ SECTION 143 STAKE I ! \ \ BLOCK 1 LOT 10 FOUND � f \\ t I I t i REPUTED OWNER: fj i k SOURAVLIS & ANNA t j I I HRISOVALANTIS ' I Ir t , rJ t , t , TRAILS do PATHS THROUGHOUT NOT SHOWN Q LD o j %! % (NO BUILDINGS) a. {{ %` %r SECTION 143 V) �� �� i BLOCK 1 LOT 11 0 � it i ��� FE a_ REPUTED OWNER: F- LJ ; t\ 1! i/ 1.2'w MARY BERNINGER < t O \\ \\ t r w LL wx FE Z Q \\ \ ( I 0.5'W 3 ~ \ \\ 1 I PIPE FE Q O \\ \ 1 FOUND I LONE 0 \ \\ ► I 0.4'W I SECTION 144 p \\ \\ I ! BLOCK 1 LOT 1 a \\\ REPUTED OWNER: w Li \\ \\I J. MORENO 1 I PIPE \\ ! FOUND \ ! 0.6'W — — t t I SECTION 144 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 I I *21' REPUTED OWNER: I I JOHN AND I { 1 1 POND MARGARET TONER I I 1.3'W I i \ f 1 MONUMENT TREE {t 1 FOUND I Row \ \t W SECTION 144 \\ s BLOCK 1 LOT 3 \ \ O O REPUTED OWNER: 0) JOHN AND N MARY FETZKO N MONUMENT — — I FOUND 77 0F3'E SECTION 144 z BLOCK 1 LOT 4 < U REP ER: EL X AND LINDA MULE I t { 1 { t FEN 0.5'W 1 I f MONUMENT R — — p + ! FOUND I SECTION 144 NOTES: 1 r, BLOCK 1 LOT 5.2 I i i I 1. LOT AREA = 20.8211 ACRES. I K ! I REPUTED OWNER: HOPE HE OWER: 2. SUBSURFACE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. J + MONUMENT11 — — I ( J ! FOUND I I t J I I r ! t I SECTION 144 CERTIFFD TO: t ! BLOCK 1 LOT 6.2 9300 ROUTE 25,. INC. I I i i I FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC. I°I ! REPUTED OWNER: FARM CREDIT EAST, ACA, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO Io I !! i J. SARNO FIRST PIONEER FARM CREDIT, ACA, IT'S SUCCESSORS AND%OR ASSIGNS) t t IaI � 1 1 w 1 ( SHED SECTION!t TION 144 D BLOCK 1 LOT 7 f f !fit 1.5'E J t REPUTED OWNER: t f I !a SHED ELIZABETH CITTI 1.8'E Date By Revision I I i SECTION 144 Surveyedck by: P.F.PFDrafted by: A.V.R. Ched by: M.A.R. 1 ► t r h BLDG. BLOCK 1 LOT 8 n ! I REPUTED OWNER: Barrel I f 1 1 DECK JAMES & VERA TAHENY 1 1 r J D.a'E FE — — 1 I 1 ! *22' 1.2'E Bonacci & I 1 l SECTION 144 Van Weele� Pic r r r r BLOCK 1 LOT 9 "t FE 1.o'E REPUTED OWNER: Civil Engineers 175A Commerce Dr. ELIZABETH CASSIDY Hauppauge, NY 11788 \ Surveyors T 631 .435.1 1 1 1 tt i MONUMENT FE Planners F 631 .435.1022 t 11 0.9'E t __FOUND MONUMENT S 69031'00" W577.68 t FE www.bbvpc.com °.8'E FOUND sEcrioN 144 Tax Ma No.: DISTRICT 100 SECTION 122 BLOCK 7 LOT 9 0.4'E TAX LOT 8.9 BLOCK 1 LOT 10 p REPUTED OWNER: MEGA STYLE LLC REPUTED OWNER: Certifications indicated hereon signify that this plat PAUL RENNER & of the property depicted hereon was made in PROPERTY MAUREEN ROCHE accordance with the existing Code of Practice for Land Surveyors adopted by the New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors. This SITUATE certification is only for the lands depicted hereon and is not certification of title,zoning or freedom �U RE of encumbrances. Said certifications shall run only to the persons and/or entities listed hereon and are not transferable to additional persons, entities or subsequent owners. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. Unauthorized alteration or addition this survey SURVEY is a violation of Section 7209 off New York State Education Law Copies of this survey map not bearing the land surveyor's embossed seal and signature shall The offsets or dimensions shown from structures to the property lines are for a specific purpose and use,and therefore,are not intended to guide in the erection of not be considered to be a true and valid copy © 2015 BBV PC IJN: SURVEY fences,retaining walls,pools,patios,planting areas,additions to buildings and any other construction. Subsurface and environmental conditions were not examined Date Scale Project No. Sheet No. �f VIEW: SURVEY or considered as a part of this survey.Easements,Rights-of-Way of record,if any,are not shown.Property corner monuments were not placed as a part of this survey. DECEMBER 30, 2014 1" = 60' A140502 r RECEIVE® DEC 14 2015 BOARD OF APPEALS > i ,,2v" t { S FIELD' J- , 150 FT X 135 FT .� �� 20,250 SQ FT ,� `'��;\_v�'`�J,rte; r%�, %�;V r^`, %` �•`�-. %L �, ' r``, J,.`7'7 �—' �`7 Wit7 71,`'r oaacc no 1; M.�y� TA /W /U yv p�q W ' nowac cLo r�• �- - - `I4 W C t v z ca M� t� t me..oLao.ar r '\, s r POOL 75 FT X 50 FT \ > Paul Pawlowsla"Owner" 9300 Main RD Corp. 9300 Main road Mattituck MY 11952 1000-122-7-9 tax map 631-445-4348 cell 1V01dE113 LOCNFAPOOLE . it�• tJ // �_ c0c 90R �� fir:. — —- _—__--——___ _— •FG'E�stOV AFF� \`� M I 7p m I T U C Fk SPUATOS COMP"'LEX. -77 -77-77 7- 7" CLOSET OFFICE#1 -J, MEZZANINE,, W% A IRVVELL YOGA/DAINICE YOGA/UMNC3 11 rE OFFICE#2 -27--l' IO KITCHEN PRO SHOP STORAGE F OFFICE#3 O CLOSET s c al C:) CD p cl > ECOND FLOOR 0 M m r-) C5- 0 Z� ('D rC=) m :> og 2015 of APP S z: 1 I, yA �. SOCCER FIELDS s z '150FT X 135FT3 %3yi 4��V -A 20,250 SQ FT r f� 12 r vK`v.`v.).Y L®0��{'v� v et��j �o.` ", �� 3f�00,001 = ,v, `"K02 4 "�4cL.�?vSLr vi' Cl) W Q U � z Z Q [a i 9 r W U � U Z Q to 6 t 75Ff X 50 Ff ............ ............ 1"4 MRTTITUCK SPORTS COMPLEX Y RECEIVE® DEC 14 2015 BOARD OF APPEALS CLOSET OFFICE#1 �V9EZZAfV16VEl YOGA/DANCE YOGA/DANCE _ OFFICE#2 KITCHEN PRO SHOP STORAGE � OFFICE#3 0 CLOSET IM 10 FF7777' L APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: 1, P ��ti 1 Date Prepared: j L 1-2- 1/ I. For Demolition of Existing Building AreasRECEIVE® Please describe areas being removed: . DEC 4 015 II. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or Ne Additions/Extensions): BOARD OF APPEALS Dimensions of first floor extension: / y 5� Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: / Height(from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: Az 49 III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristi FORE Alterations: Number of Floors and CharjgK WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: IQ Proposed increase of building coverage: °,V Square footage of your Iot: q# 2 Percentage of coverage of your lot U building area: o V. Purpose of New.Construction: ��✓� /,�C. t��,L�� ���Lj VI. Please describe the land contours (flat,slope%,heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): u� Please submit seven (7) photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 1-1114 . 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 RECEIVED DEC 14 2015 QUESTIONNAIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION BOAR® OF APPEALS 1. Has a determination been made regarding Site Plan review? Yes >— No If no, please inquiry with the ZBA office and if site plan is required,you may apply to the Planning Dept. at the same time so both applications can be reviewed concurrently. 2. Are their any proposals to change or alter land contours? a. ><O - Yes please explain on attached sheet. 3. Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? /"49 a. 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? b. 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? c. 4.)If your property co tains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. 4. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? (� 5. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? Al 0 Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above-line. / 6. D_oyouu have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? s°'�If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: ,✓�� 7. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to obtain copies of them. 8. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 9. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel �/.��tf '� � and the proposed use (ex:existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other or vacant proposed office with apartments above,etc.) Authorized signature and Date RECEIVE® A.GPJCULTYIRAL DATA STATEMENT DEC 14 2015 / A l� ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS- - WHEN r6 DISE THIS FORM: The forma must be completed by,the applicant for any-special use per►ttit,site plan approval;'use variance,or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within S00•feet df a fartn pperation located in agricultural district.All applicationsrequiring ah agriculturtd'data• statV1nent must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with seddotts 239= in a'ttd 239-n_of the detieral lKunicipol-L'aw. 1)Name of Applicant: 0 � - 2)Address of Applicant: I - 1r)Zk ,W /l9 ' - .3)14ame-of Land'Owrkr(if other than applicant) : - 4)Address of Land Owner: ,'- 5)Desctiptiori-of 3�ropbsed Project: t '6)Location of Property(road and tax map number): 04D 6l,^/Ao> Ll�A/ /Z (' -7)Is.the parcel within aim agricultural district? o ❑Yes If yes,Agricultural District Number . 8)Is this parcel'actively fariried?, 'i�tc� C]Ices 9) Name and -address 'of ariy. owner(p) of land within the agricultural district containing active faun operations)located 506'feet of the boundary of-the proposed project: (inf ination may lie:available throe h� the Town Assessors'Office, Town Hall lodation'(765-1937)-or from-any public computer at the Town Fall lo-catiortS by viewing the parcel numbers on the-Town of Southold Real Property-Tax System. ' Name*ancl.Address : 5; _ (Please use liar*side of page if iriore than six property owners are.identified.) ... :The lot numbers mai be obtained,in advance,when regdgsted from the Qffice of the Planning Board at 765- 1939 oi the Zoning Board of Appeals at 765-1809. : Signature of Applicant Date - 1.The local boaid will'solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation.Solicitation will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2"Comments returned to the jocal board will be taken into consideratioQ as part of the overall review of this application. 3.The clerk to the local board is•resporisible fot sending copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement to tfie property owners identified above.The cost for mailing shall be paid by the applicant at the time the application is-submitted for review.Failure to pay at such time means the application is not complete and cannot be acted upon by the board. 1-14-09- 6IZ20 RECEIVE® �q Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form DEC 14 2015 f&I l� Instructions for Completing BOARD OF APPEALS Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information �WWL � G1Gs/l/ Name of Action or Project: 4—' 5,o0bX7U Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): ��o �r 14'oe-tlizzy G"G Brief Description of Proposed Action: 11e0M7-'Y t IA,67-s �z—srvess ejU8 — Name of Applicant or Sponsor. Telephone: J� J_ pltbv Lr9�✓S Ar_' E-Mail: Add ss: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent ofthe proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and.permit or approval: 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(Project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban +ZRural(non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial>61tesidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture o Aquatic ❑Other(specify): o Parkland Page 1 of 4 f i E RECEIVED 5. Is the proposed action, DEC 20 5 NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ep b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? R® OF APPEALS )41 /4' 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: X 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local_agenoy_?.-- ____ I—\/- b. __—__ — _b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical ha itat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline orest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban. ❑Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water-discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ; a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? O❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoffand s orm drains)? r If Yes,briefly describe: ❑N?,"S Page 2 of 4 I r I a 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result i n ment of' NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? +,� If Yes,explain purpose and size: n C f 7 015 ` LA A >< 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the I*' a 've or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: X 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name:_ �T��LY�� S�r ^ Date: L 2 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" a L '� , ' � - , '�°' • �� ' � �n No,or Moderate '•� small to large - ' L Will the proposed-action-create_a_material-conflict with-an-adopted-land-me-plan or-zoning --`--^-- regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality ofthe existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or j affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? N1- b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. -Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, 0 waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? % Page 3 of 4 j i 1 d .J =- �•' _ .,i.`.' ��SF,'„•: cif '.�' :?de'7��•,r'}:••tZ Y.l-'%yl: No,or Moderate small to large impact impact ��;-'i.. may may •t` __i= '�{t1_';-'{'i:• 'i:.ij=:'�.� �'a•s.~�-}:�:`l_�'�:�"�<'+ ''.moi?"i'F�{:rn•- Ir• �3=7'i;.:�F,,%! F f--" - -"+- - ••<'�rr<.:r_�'r:� •%€v%ii'S.'..Fi�:a�:i:%1fi.Fri``,�- J�3ir'`Sl^Si'ti'ain.^y-ft ' sLTi.2x"ioi''�.a'pv'`F.� OCCUr OCCLLC 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? �C 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. h Oq RECEIVED Pry DEC 14 2015 BOARD- OF APPEALS ❑ Check this box ifyou have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 1 RECEIVED .10 DEC 14 2015 6j, APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM BOARD OF APPEALS The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees.The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid sam4wez,- YOUR NAME: � �&/ (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat r'� �j Mooring Other(activity) �/le.�ii —!�/=B ' " 9� Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest" means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If YES,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)throu h D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of ,20 Signature Print Name Town of Southold - RECEIVED LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM DEC 14 2015 A. INSTRUCTIONS lt7 BOARD OF APPEALS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial-and-ad rse eff-ects upor eeoas#M-area{tic-li 4udes-a-l4of-Sou#fiald3�wn). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM - --� - � `7 The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept rr'�' Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: RECEIVED Location of action: �j�°� �'¢"`J 12P ro Site acreage: ,p, i —� � ! Present land use: V� a� - DEC � 2015 `q�p Present zoning classification: !`) BOARD OF APPEAL 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provide • Q e � (a) Name of applicant: / (b) Mailing address: FV 60 t (c) Telephone number:Area Code (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be dir ctly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED-COAST POLICY - -- - —Policy-1:Foster-a-pattern of-development-in-the-Townof-Southold-that-enhances-community-characters---- ---- preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Xes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pa es 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes 1:1 No of Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria l Yes ❑ No ❑ RECEIVED Not Applicable DEC 14 2015 BOARD E)FAPPEALS- Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No P Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable r i RECEIVED E® l� IL to DEC I A 904 Attach additional sheets if necessary BOA Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III—Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No of Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LV,/RP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public accessand recrea ' , coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See L-WRP Section,III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation cA er'a. Yes❑ No❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. Se LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ycs 0 No Not Applicable gFCEIv ED n � 4 Mb ER 130 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ��ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect-agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LW" Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Not Applicable RECEfVbU bq sports E east ,, . t AL of— `•Iy t A^'T ti✓ �I n tt �' RECEIVED Of-l: ,�4 q BOARD OF APPEALS ISO, 12 -12 sports E east iL e Paul Pawlowski"Owner" 9300 Main RD Corp. 9300 Main road Mattituck MY 11952 1000-122-7-9 tax map 631-445-4348 cell RECEIVED BOARD OF APPEALS TM .' 12 12 sports CE east � Paul Pawlowski"Owner" 9300 Main RD Corp. 9300 Main road Mattituck N.Y 11952 1000-122-7-9 tax map 631-445-4348 cell I F i � f y. i� »I, i` sports -CE east sports CE w east 1 � � x t � 1 I ®�O0�FFOCAr ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,MMC may. <fy Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERKO � P.O.Box 1179 H Z Southold,New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS _ Fax(631)765-6145 MARRIAGE OFFICER �'� �Q`' Telephone(631)765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER www.southoldtownny.gov FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: December 17, 2015 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 6914 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 6914 for Pawlowski,Inc.-The Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals for a Special Exception. Also enclosed is the Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire,Agricultural Data Statement, Short Environmental Assessment Form, Applicant/Owner Transactional Disclosure Form from Paul Pawlowski, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Aerial Map of Land, Photo of Proposed "Sports East",Photo of Aerial View of the Building and Parking Lot, Aerial and Front View of the Building, A Drawing of the Interior of the Mattituck Sports Complex, A Drawing of the Second Floor Proposed Rooms, A Photo of the Proposed"Sports East"Building Frontal View,A Photo of the Proposed"Sport East"Building Side View, Drawing of the Interior Rooms of the Mattituck Sports Complex, Drawing of th'e Second-Floor-Rooms of the Complex,A Sketch Plan of the Proposed Site and Building, A Copy of fhe.Survey for Tax Map No. 1000-122.-7-9. L I * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 12/16/15 Receipt#: 195081 Quantity Transactions Reference Subtotal 1 ZBA Application Fees 6914 $750.00 Total Paid: $750.00 Notes: Payment Type Amount Paid By CK#1852 $750.00 Pawlowski, Inc Southold Town Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Name: Pawlowski, Inc P O Box 783 Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: SABRINA Internal ID:6914 J Leyla Szpara tC S 1830 Sigsbee Road, Mattituck,NY 11952 JUN 2 3 20 � I � 1s 43-30 44 Street, Sunnyside,NY 11104 BY.--1, 9-2 / 4� (917) 699-8233v June 20,2016 Chairperson Leslie Weisman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11791 Re: Proposed Sports Facility in Mattituck Dear Chairperson Weisman: On behalf of my husband Paul and myself, and as proud new land owners ready to build our house in the residential beach community of Sigsbee Road in Mattituck, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Sports East project. I am concerned the existence of such an enormous facility will bring about undesirable outcomes impacting the environment and quality of life for residents and visitors. The removal of so many trees near the Husing Preserve behind our lot would be a detriment to the quality of life we seek in our community. Aside from how this project may affect residents personally, here are some important issues the Town Board should consider before making a determination: 1. With added noise and congestion,property values will likely decrease for many local homeowners. What will ensue is the reduction of property tax rates which I imagine would be disadvantageous to any of the Town Board's strategic plans; 2. The clearing of over 20 acres of trees adjacent to the Husing Preserve will have a negative environmental impact. Moreover, it will change the climate of the area, increasing pollution and contributing to global warming. The added traffic and congestion will only exacerbate this; 3. The facility will be an eyesore in a known rural community, changing its character-- especially for those living and vacationing nearby. I urge the Zoning Board to consider these critical issues and vote to deny the proposed Sports East project in its entirety. S erely, Leyla zpara Cc: Honorable Supervisor Scott Russell Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Southold Town Board PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Chairperson Leslie Weisman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ,s' �ru; Fhej, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 JUN 2 0 2016 Dear Chairperson Weisman: B Y-- LAI$ My husband and I live on Sigsee Rd. We are expressing our opposition to the request made for a Special Exception to create Sports East. We support the Zoning Board in its decision to closely examine the proposal and investigate if the owners will be entitled to Special Exception as an "annual membership" club. A large facility with a number of amenities, as the proposal indicates, will create a location for public and special events. It is likely that such special events will be deemed necessary by the owners in order to sustain such a facility in order to make it financially viable . The 240 car parking lot is quite a tall order to fill with "members" at any given time. I do not believe this small community has the population necessary to fill all of the spaces with "Members". Thus creating a need to bring in revenue by some other means. The large parking lot can also create a trouble spot. It would be out of site of the main road and after hours of operation will invite all sorts of unwanted gatherings. This could lead to vandalism of nearby homes. We fear the noise and nightmare of traffic on the already congested road that this business would create. The current lovely property would be the home of a very large and ugly metal structure if the Exception is granted. If the project to is approved and eventually fails due to a lack of continually paid up "members"the result would be a profit less business . We ask what will we be left with?!?... a huge ugly building..... and then what??? We trust that you will conclude that the proposed use doesn't qualify for Special Exception as a Members Club Sincerely, John Toner Margaret Toner a��z cc:Scott Russell, Supervisor Town Planning Board S � June 16 2016 7- Chairperson Leslie Weisman yep rrs C,+s Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals MO XImEl 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 JUN 2 0 2016 Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman: Our family purchased a second home on Peconic Bay Boulevard in Mattituck almost 25 years ago attracted by the picturesque area highlighted by the Sigsbee Road Beach and the Peconic Bay, as well as the privacy, security and beauty offered by the Hussing Pond Preserve, 21 acre preserve with nature trail, pond, and Osprey nest. These beautiful offerings have become a place where generations of the Sigsbee Road families call their summer home. With the planned facility, this will change. We cannot begin to imagine what the Sigsbee Road residents will experience when we are adjacent to the proposed facility. This facility will definitely end up being home for large gatherings such as tournaments and other special events. The noise level will be excruciating. Many of our members are summer residents and our homes are vacant during the off season. Typically this is not a problem because our year round residents keep watch on the homes of their neighbors. Due to the exposure of a public area, security will definitely be an issue,the preserve property will be trodden and noise will be an absolute horror. When we drive around the North Fork,we see so much vacant land along other parts of the community, and now the former Mattituck Airport property,we find it difficult to believe that this group cannot find a location in a more remote space. Needless to say additional problems will be traffic,noise pollution and congestion. If the facility as proposed does not work out,the property, complete with the proposed building and the destruction of trees in the wooded area will be left abandoned. Is this what we want for our Sigsbee Road community. Additionally,we cannot begin to imagine the interaction from the horses at Highwind Farms. That will be a horror! We hope the Zoning Board will conclude that this is not a good choice for our community and the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Please do your best to prevent this facility from happening! ZThank u arie and Richard Scliulken 16 Capel Drive,Dix Hills,NY 11746 10435'Peconic Bay Boulevard,Mattituck,NY 11952 S Attorney at Law 1220 & 1295 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 15 Little Neck Road Douglaston,NY 11363 (516) 503-5344 June 13, 2016 Chairperson Leslie Weisman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 BY Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Chairperson Weisman: As the owner of 2 homes on Sigsbee Road in Mattituck, I am writing to express my opposition to the granting of a variance to Sports East, and to their proposal as a whole, and to express my support for the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to examine more closely whether the facility should be entitled to a special exception as an annual membership club. No matter what the developer has said to date (and he has said a lot of different things over the course of his 3 applications for 3 different projects), I do not believe the facility will an `aririvaTmembership;clul?'_' of the type contemplated by the R80 zoning use district. The sheer size of the proposed facility, and the number of amenities it will feature, will make it a natural location for public events such as tournaments and other special events. In order to make such a large facility economically viable, the owners will be forced into bringing in outside events, even if they deny that now, because the population density of the area simply will not support a "membership club" of this size and character. While my opposition to the facility rests on the traffic, noise pollution and congestion it will bring to our quiet residential community, what will be even worse will be the inevitable failure of the project. The facility as proposed would need a large number of consistently paid up members in order to turn a profit, and for a summer community.that is a very tall order. Should the business fail, we will be left with a huge empty building and land cleared of trees and animals. The 21 acre parcel in question will go from being a beautiful part of our town to an ugly eyesore and possible trouble spot, and no one will benefit from that. I hope the Zoning Board will conclude that a facility of this magnitude cannot realistically be a true membership club, in which case the proposed use does not qualify for the special exception and the application of Sports East will be denied. Very truly yours, 4J, Linda A. Mule \lam U fo<- s T481 Joy Ellinghaus `'_ (, 2375 Sigsbee Rd JUN 2 0 2016_ Mattituck, NY 11952 /� t June 14, 2016 BY... Dear Chairperson Weisman, I am writirng today to voice my very serious con cerhs'regarding the �potts eoMplex pf0je-OUthat Paul Pawlowski and-his-partners are asking to develop on the Main fad. in Mattituck. Mr. Pawlowski seems to have garnered much support for this project and I'd like to believe it's because his motives are altruistic, seeing as he is a local developer. That said, there have been too many instances where he seems to be either misinformed or uninterested in the very possible negative outcomes of some issues surrounding the project. When traffic concerns were raised to Mr. Pawlowski at a meeting.at the Town Hall,. I was there and heard him assuredly promise that any study would be done in conjunction with the DOT.-When the time came, Mr. Pawlowski chose a private firm to conduct a basic car counting survey in the month of March, 2016, seeming or not caring to understand that it was the height of the season that was of most concern. Therefore, his study in March was really of no use at all, and that's just not good enough for a place that kids will be walking or riding their bikes to and-from. Of course there are environmental concerns that would take too long to address, so I'll just state the obvious: where there is overdevelopment, there is eventual environmental catastrophe. We see'this time and again, in cities whose'infrastructure is far beyond our own. Fork's capabilities. Even one building, poorly sited can be the catalyst. Despite,Mr. Pawlowski's confidence, there are no guarantees of commercial success.The ramifications of another failed business in exchange for a,razed wooded lot are dire, as the Capital One building can attest, sitting empty across the street going on year four. Speaking of the Capital One building, it could have easily been remodeled to achieve Mr. Pawlowski's vision for this project, so his sports complex is a perfect example of a failure of both preservation and adaptive reuse. Finally, when the possibility of preservation was mentioned by Representative Krupski at a meeting held in Riverhead, Mr. Pawlowski rejected the idea out of hand, stating he did not have another commercial property in which to place the sports club. Several weeks later it was revealed that in fact it was he and his partners in the sports complex that had bought the large acreage located at the Mattituck Airport. This would probably be an ideal location for the sports complex. The,preservation of the wooded lot on the Maln'Rd. would then be a possibility vis-a-vis a County purchase. In my opinion, this would define Mr. Pawlowski as sincerely altruistic. The zoning issue may be complex on its face, but perhaps that is because Mr. Pawlowski was disingenuous with his first descriptions as to what the "health club" would be., Whatever the case, it's ended up being an 80,000 square foot commercial business. Yes, it's coming through a special exception, but it might as well'be a zoning change. If the Board allows this interpretation here, many developers will cite this in the future to convert residential zoning to commercial zoning with a mere special ' exception. It will be hard for the Board to control future requests just like this, savvy developers skating the thinnest ice imaginable in definitions and feigning the true accuracy'and scope of their projects, until it's too late, built, and litigation is in the works for similar projects which may get denied. Developers are waiting and watching to see how this area can be exploited. Please send them a clear message that this kind of exploitation will not be tolerated and to pursue adaptive reuse first. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely (YS CST eVA / Fuentes, Kim ,UN From: _' �' paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> BY: Sent: Monday,June 20, 2016,12:22 PM _ +� To: Don Wilcenski; Lanza, Heather, Charles Cuddy,Joe Slovak; Steve Marsh; Cummings, Brian A. Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-06-20 at 12.06.25 PM.png Hello Should we schedule a work session to clear some confusion up , I think the segra determination can be done with information you have with site plan,traffic study etc so thats one thing that doesn't effect the defmition of our "use" however we the applicant definitely would like to clear the air on some confusion Since there is confusion with what we feel is amenities and sports offered'for our members for sports east and it seems the planning board or even some public concerns feel they are "uses" should we schedule a work session to go over these items For us the letter that was sent to the zba talks about concerns for proposed "uses" and I think that is were we are confused. We the applicant think there is 1 "use" that we have applied for with multiple sports and amenities being offered to our members similar to other country clubs in the area. ,For instance we-are applying for a private membership multi sport club with the following amenities tennis,basketball,pool, food cafe, locker rooms, gym, rock wall, batting cages', sports fields. The food service is for the members only and not open to the public so this is the same as the food service north fork country club and laurel links offers but not a full blown restaurant. The courts, fields and gym are what we are offering our members and these are the same offered at local clubs plus a few more but again this is to members only yes multi sports but again only 1 "use" So main question is we feel we have applied for a single use as defined.is 280-13 item 7 and see attached only and will follow those rules To be clear we have not applied for and do not want the following which can be perceived as a commercial use and we realize and have always realized thaf this is not allowable as your letter states , again these items below are concerns but have never been part of our application 1. commercial club or open to the public type club 2. teams,and local schools having tournaments etc at sports east 3. child day care services So yes these are different uses and something we have not applied for so question is while they maybe concerns why would the letter to zba state that the planning board wants to find out if these are allowable under the special exception code when this is not what we want? We have applied for the following use and only use 1 , tip- • :B•ea•ch cl"ubs=;tennis:clubs;`"co.untry,,olub"s,.golf bWbs and,'nnuW,rn bership clubs arid-"accessory p,cIygrou"n'ds.,-.f?-eacFre:s;."swimmin"g"pools, tennis.courts;.irecrea06 - l`b—lding"s.and'ma ntena"r�.ce build i gs catering°'exclusively to memti"ers and the r'guests sub"'t to:.the:following requirements: ;No building-"or par''th, reof"or any parking.or:loading;areashallbe"located`within,1'00�feet of.:any `street""line:or"within�'S0'feet of"any lot line'. oTh'total area covered:Eby"principal and accessory buildings sha1F nat,exceed 20%."of the area,of the.Iot, No'suct%use.sh"all occupy a-�16t with,an;area of So the work session would be great to clear this up , also if we need to change the scale of things we are willing to do that as well. We want to make sure that concerns of some of the public do not confuse what we have applied for. We also want to make sure the planning board and zba has the ability to approve this under the - special exception code as well. As for the site plan we will work on scale if need be but have done a good job on setbacks etc to ensure proper safety and concerns for the public. This private sports club is being proposed to better our town, this is not for personal gain by the developers, this is not a burden on the tax payer, this is part of the comprehensive plan, this is in short an amazing opportunity for us all to enjoy. We will follow the code and want to make sure our application is clear and our intentions are clear. On our end we do not see this any different then the local country clubs that exist under the same rules except we are offering more. Please let us know if this work session can be scheduled so we can get this back on track Thank you Paul Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax 2 Fuentes, Kirn From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Tuesday,June 14, 2'016 10:46 AM To: 'Eric Dantes'; 'George Horning'; 'Gerard Goehringer'; 'Jerry Goehringer.- 2nd Qpgnfli@gmail.com)'; Schneider, Kenneth; Leslie Weisman Forward;Weisman, Leslie Cc:, Duffy, Bill � - D� Subject: RE: Sports,East-t! oposed Mattituck sports facility ✓U1V . Email from resident below , dU16 0 Kim E. Fuentes, Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals : ���•v Town of Southold 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 From: Lynn Cianci [mailto:lcianci@coopervision.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 10:32 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: proposed Mattituck sports facility' As a resident of Mattituck I have many concerns regarding the proposed Mattituck sports facility. For one Mr. Pawlowski, is taking away our untouched land and wasting resources. He,said it himself that we already have the Capitol one bank bu'ilding that is vacant and directly across the street from his proposedsite-so why not use this vacant facility that already has access to Main Rd and would have the least amount of construction impact on our local environment. He has also said that the membership would be affordable-well that is a very relative term by Mr Pawlowski. What may be affordable-to him may be out of reach for many of the local year round residents. What is holding him back from making this info public-the approx cost of the memberships should be given with the full proposal. Why is the town of Southold not protecting their residents and finding out the membership costs? We the residents of the Town of Southold would like to know the proposed membership fees-then we will see how many local residents are in favor of these plans. More importantly why did the only member representing the town of Southold not vote in the most recent planning' commission vote and all those that did vote are not even part of the town of Southold -who's town is,this anyways? Maybe a sports facility should be built in the residential areas of'East Hampton and Southampton? Better yet how about this facility be built in Mr. Pawlowski's backyard with a •80ft tree buffer for privacy. What are the plans to buffer the noise from a soccer field that could conceivably have a crowd of 100+ people, cheering and playing from 5:30 am to 11:000pm on any given day or night of the week or weekend ? Has the issue of noise pollution been addressed? Is anyone listening out there or is it too loud already that you cannot hear us. This is a beautiful residential community, why is the Town of Southold allowing a developer to ruin'it. What happened to the Peconic Land Trust Foundation? Why did we pay into this fund if they are not available to support the community when we need them? If this project is approved we are allowing Mr. Pawlowski to make.Mattituck a commercial community that will be the host to large sporting events year-round and a large commercial building that will resemble- that of an industrial park warehouse. If the Town of Southold is doing this for the increase in tax revenue than maybe they should look at other alternatives. For example—trim the fat in local government, increase waste disposal fees for non-residents, increase • 1 summer recreational fees for non-resioenis, etc... We the residents of Town of Southold need the local government to have our backs and protect us from industrial invasions like this. Thank you for your time, Lynn Cianci 2 sol\V Fuentes; Kim From: Paul Pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com'> Sent: Friday,June 10, 2016 6:34 AM BY'-= -- To: Lanza, Heather;Cummings,-Brian A.;don@briarclifflandscape.com" Hello 110 1 There are a few'things I would like to clear the air on. I was told that I was showing impatience during this application and that I am bullying the board. Please know that I think this process has gone at lighting speed and many time's my engineers and I have even said-that to each we can't believe how well'this is going. With the timing of things as the applicant I can not say more about how helpful and organized the process has gone Once this letter came out I have sent emails asking questions as the letter was concerning and if during these emails I showed that I was impatient I do apologize that was not my intention. My intention was,to understand "why" as soon as I could and not push anyone to do anything. When it comes to how the planning board has worked with me as the applicant I can simply say that the experience has been very good. Both this application and the other two that were proposed for this property As for bullying in my emails I expressed concern from- ,the letter. Not once was I blaming the board or trying to bully anyone. I sent my emails because this letter left-me clueless as to the process and the timing of things. In one email I mentioned I would do what I can to find out were the pressure was coming from and being put on this application and if that was perceived to be bullying again it was not my intention at all. As an applicant I have to understand,the good and the bad and were the source is in order to work out the kinks of an application and in this case I was concerned with were this was coming from. This is an application that is not"one sided'and it is not for the applicant or developer to prosper. This is not your ordinary application were the developer has his or her own interest in mind only. I have passion for this proposal which then brings out emotion. I hope that I have shown to be helpful just as you have during this process and have done everything ask-for by the board and will continue to do so. For myself and the people that have worked closely on this application I am confident we know how our meetings_have gone and the intentions each person has and that is nothing but respect and professionalism. Sports east is important to me but my reputation and values are much more to me then any application I would put forth. Thanks again for your time - 1 ' KAL Fuentes, Kim From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Thursday,June 09, 2016 8:11 AM To: Eric Dantes; George Horning; Gerard Goehringer;Jerry Goe �*z Opgnfli@gmail.com); Schneider, Kenneth;Weisman, LeslieCc: Duffy, Bill /Yin, Subject: #6914 Sports East, Paul Pawlowski ®9 D Attachments: Re: Sports East; Re: Sports East Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 631-765-1809, Ex.5011 1 s. 'a" 4D Fuentes, Kim From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Thursday,June 09, 2016 9:03 AM To: Eric Dantes; George Horning; Gerard Goehringer;Jerry Goehringer- 2nd Opgnfli@gmail.com); Schneider, Kenneth;Weisman, Leslie Subject: ZBA#6914 Sports East D xcx J zfill ��lilt 09 2010 Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals L ®® Town of Southold 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 From: Doris & Ron McGreevy [mailto:mcgreeyy1(-0aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:57 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Fwd: Sports East Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Doris &Ron McGreevy<mcgreevyl@aol.com> Date: June 9, 2016 at 8:53:41 AM EDT To: Weisman-kimf@southoldto=.g_ov Subject: Sports East Dear Ms. Weisman and the Zoning Board of Appeals, After attending one hearing and two Matt.-Laurel Civic Association meetings on the subject of allowing the Sports East facility to become a permanent structure on Main Rd(Rte. 25) in Mattituck, I believe this project is unsuitable for the area in question. Specifically, the full capacity at this facility is 300 persons. The anticipated influx of cars expected along with the spring-summer tourist season would undoubtably cause mayhem along Rte. 25. Add the eventual use of the old Capital One building across from Sports East and the traffic problem will be compounded. The total project, including indoor and outdoor sports include: 9 tennis courts (4 indoor and 5 outdoor), two soccer fields (one indoor, one outdoor) with the indoor field not air conditioned, along with a host of other activities. The shallow pool (four ft) is not olympic- sized as first mentioned at the meetings at the civic association. The building itself is a metal Morton building 550 ft. long, surrounded by deciduous trees,that will mask the building only when trees are in full bloom but be highly visible in Fall and Winter months. The large driveways will only accentuate this stark project. 1 This project is a private, exclusive paid membership -only sports facility appealing to those that can afford it. Presently, the Suffolk County Community College sports facility, only 14 miles away, is in the process of developing a true public asset. It will soon be available to all Suffolk County residents for a nominal charge. How exciting to use an Olympic sized pool provided by our tax dollars and available to all. In summary, please consider these above comments as you evaluate the application. Sincerely, Doris McGreevy Sent from my iPad z Fuentes, Kim From: paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> - 0 Sent: Wednesday,June 08, 2016 4:08 PM � To: Fuentes, Kim;Joe Slovak; Charles Cuddy; Lanza, Heather; Cu mi anztI don@briarclifflandscape.com; Chris Dwyer ®9 ?® D Subject: Re:Sports East To say the least this is concerning (the link below) and honestly there is one word for it- wrong I look forward to getting this back on track and I ask you to do whats right and whats within code. I have faith it will and I put my trust in the process and what I was told. This goes against everything we have worked hard for http://southoldlocal.com/2016/06/08/sports-east-plan-dealt-setback-planning-board-raises-doubts-use-kicks- application-zba-interpretation/ On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM,paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com>wrote: Hello Can you please read the attached memo from the planning board in January This letter specifically states that our application is consistent with the code, with the comprehensive plan etc. This letter along with the zba public hearing and along with the several conversations that I had with the planning board prior to spending any real money gave us the applicants the confidence to move forward with this site plan application, I still have no idea how the letter sent to the ZBA can even be drafted and sent? I still have not heard from one person from the planning board or the zba in a reply to an on my emails I have sent over the past week. I am extremely embarrassed by the fact that I have received over 100 emails and phones calls these past few days were our residents think this was approved and they are extremely excited and happy that it was approved based on the suffolk planning commission endorsement. Why Am I embarrassed is because we all have false hopes until this is back on track verses halted. I also want you to know that Southold Local just called me and they aware of the memo sent by the zba last week, I did not call them I want to point out and honestly I dont want anyone knowing about that letter as I think it is a problem . They asked me what I thought of the letter and as I have said to you I told them I was concerned as to why this letter came in the 11th inning as it contradicts everything we have worked hard on since November I have asked several times what is the next step? were is the pressure coming from and why was this letter sent now and not in the beginning I have mentioned the word "I" above I mean "we" 1 On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:28 PM,paul pawlowski<pawlowskibiz@gmail.com>wrote: To: ZBA Chairperson From: Sports East Applicant Date: 5-31-16 To Whom It May Concern: I wanted to send a letter in response to the letter you received from the planning board today in reference to Sports East and the next steps. We respect that the planning board is trying to be cautious in their process and that is understood. However this letter is overall misleading and going backwards so to say. From what I understand the planning board was in the middle of making their SEQRA determination and that is why we spent the last several months putting together the assets and information they needed in order to do so. I say this is going backwards because why is this letter being sent now? I was told that we should have expected a SEQRA determination at the June 6th meeting and now it is May 31St and that has been put on hold? The letter sent raises concerns that I guess were asked at the public hearing that the planning board held or at least some of those concerns were mentioned and not all that were listed in the letter you received from the planning board. These are concerns and not facts and that is the point of my letter to you today. From day one the owners and applicant of Sports East have been consistent, the site plan has not changed and what we are proposing within that site plan has not changed and we have never changed what we are proposing both in the ZBA hearing, the civic association public forum, the chamber of commerce public forum and then at the planning board hearing. We have stayed on point with what we are proposing. Both in public meetings and within any local paper or article we have always made sure that what we are saying is what we have proposed and put forth in our application to the planning board and ZBA. This is important as we need a special exemption under the code and we not only want to comply we also know that we fit within the rules that would allow a special exception. This letter you received from planning is exactly what I asked the planning board in the early stages of the process before any major funding was spent on the site plan process. The process we took was as followed 1. Received a letter of denial from Building Dept. 2 3 - 1a Fuentes, Kim I From: paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 08, 2016 5:54 PM To: Fuentes, Kim;Joe Slovak; Charles Cuddy; Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; don@briarclifflandscape.com; Chris Dwyer Subject: Re: Sports East Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-06-08 at 5.30.50 PM.png; Screen Shot 2016-06 at 5.30.58 PM.png; Screen Shot 2016-06-08 at 5.31.10 PM.png See attached as I am not the only one concerned by this all 19 Today has not been a good day to say the least On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM,paul pawlowski <pawlowskibizna,gmail.com>wrote: �,®® Hello Can you please read the attached memo from the planning board in January This letter specifically states that our application is consistent with the code, with the comprehensive plan etc. This letter along with the zba public hearing and along with the several conversations that I had with the planning board prior to spending any real money gave us the applicants the confidence to move forward with this site plan application, I still have no idea how the letter sent to the ZBA can even be drafted and sent? I still have not heard from one person from the planning board or the zba in a reply to an on my emails I have sent over the past week. I am extremely embarrassed by the fact that I have received over 100 emails and phones calls these past few days were our residents think this was approved and they are extremely excited and happy that it was approved based on the suffolk planning commission endorsement. Why Am I embarrassed is because we all have false hopes until this is back on track verses halted. I also want you to know that Southold Local just called me and they aware of the memo sent by the zba last week, I did not call them I want to point out and honestly I dont want anyone knowing about that letter as I think it is a problem . They asked me what I thought of the letter and as I have said to you I told them I was concerned as to why this letter came in the 11th inning as it contradicts everything we have worked hard on since November I have asked several times what is the next step? were is the pressure coming from and why was this letter sent now and not in the beginning I have mentioned the word "I" above I mean "we" On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:28 PM,paul pawlowski <pawlowskibizggmail.com>wrote: To: ZBA Chairperson 1 From: Sports East Applicant Date: 5-31-16 To Whom It May Concern: I wanted to send a letter in response to the letter you received from the planning board today in reference to Sports East and the next steps. We respect that the planning board is trying to be cautious in their process and that is understood. However this letter is overall misleading and going backwards so to say. From what I understand the planning board was in the middle of making their SEQRA determination and that is why we spent the last several months putting together the assets and information they needed in order to do so. I say this is going backwards because why is this letter being sent now? I was told that we should have expected a SEQRA determination at the June 6th meeting and now it is May 31St and that has been put on hold? The letter sent raises concerns that I guess were asked at the public hearing that the planning board held or at least some of those concerns were mentioned and not all that were listed in the letter you received from the planning board. These are concerns and not facts and that is the point of my letter to you today. From day one the owners and applicant of Sports East have been consistent, the site plan has not changed and what we are proposing within that site plan has not changed and we have never changed what we are proposing both in the ZBA hearing, the civic association public forum, the chamber of commerce public forum and then at the planning board hearing. We have stayed on point with what we are proposing. Both in public meetings and within any local paper or article we have always made sure that what we are saying is what we have proposed and put forth in our application to the planning board and ZBA. This is important as we need a special exemption under the code and we not only want to comply we also know that we fit within the rules that would allow a special exception. This letter you received from planning is exactly what I asked the planning board in the early stages of the process before any major funding was spent on the site plan process. The process we took was as followed 1. Received a letter of denial from Building Dept. 2. Submitted application to planning board with a sketch plan only and was told that we would have to go before the ZBA prior to submitting a full application 2 Fuentes. Kim From: ' Paul Pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Wedn-esday,June 08, 2016 10:53 AM To: Fuentes, Kim Subject: Sports East Hello Kim I was told by Heather in planning today to contact you or the ZBA to find out next steps with my, application? Is there anything scheduled Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell ' 631-850-5452 fax Fuentes, Kim From: paul pawlowski <p6wloWsl ibiz@gmail-com> Sent: Wednesday,June 08, 2016 10:34 AM To: Fuentes, Kim;Joe Slovak; Charles Cuddy; Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; don@briarcliftlandscape:com; Chris Dwyer Subject: Re: Sports East Attachments: Sports East' planning_board_letter.,jan_25_2016.pdf ®�� 3 JUN Hello Q Q 2416 0 Can you please read the attached memo from the planning board in January This letter specifically states that our application is consistent with the code, with the comprehensive plan etc. This letter along with"the zba public hearing and along with the several conversations that-1 had with the - planning board prior to spending any real money gave us the applicants the confidence to move forward with this site plan application , I still have no idea how the letter sent to the ZBA can even be drafted and sent? I still have not heard from one person from the planning board or the zba in a reply to an on my emails I have sent over the past week. I am'extremely embarrassed by the fact that I have received over 100 emails and phones calls these past few days were our residents think this was approved and they are extremely excited and happy that it was approved based on the suffolk planning commission endorsement. Why Am I embarrassed is because we'all have false hopes until this is back on track verses halted. I also want you to know that Southold Local just called'me and they aware of the memo sent by the'zba last week, I did not call them I want to point out and honestly I dont want anyone knowing about that letter as I think it is a problem . They asked me what I thought of the letter and as I have said to you I told them I was concerned as to why this letter came in the 11th inning as it contradicts everything we have worked hard on since November I have asked several times what is the next step? were is the pressure coming from and why was this letter sent now and not in the beginning I have mentioned the word "I" above I mean "we" On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:28 PM, paul pawlowski<pawlowskibiz cr,gmail.com>wrote: To: ZBA Chairperson From: Sports East Applicant OFFICE LOCATION: . ��x � MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annexo� S�UTy�Yt� P.O.Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 �� f,' 4 Southold,NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765=1988 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From:, Donald J. Wilcenski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board ovw, Date: January 25, 2016 Re: Request for Planning Comments for ZBA#6914 Sports East Fitness Club Located at 9300 Route 25, :141's1w/o Sidsbee Road & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 The Planning Board has reviewed ,the Special Exception Application referenced above. , As you are aware, the standards that the Zoning Board of Appeals considers for Special Exception uses, as outlined in Sections §280-142 and §280-143 of the Southold Town Code, relate to assessment of traffic and pedestrian safety, and potential impacts to natural resources, community character, and quality of life. All of these issues are examined in the State Environmental Quality Review (SEAR) process which the Planning Board will be conducting as part of the Site Plan review. The Planning Board has received a partial Site Plan Application and is prepared to make preliminary comments; however,'the review of the applications should be concurrent. It is recommended that the SEQR analysis on this Site Plan be coordinated with the Zoning Board of Appeals as an involved agency to benefit the applicant. We reviewed the proposal for its consistency with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. Upon reviewing the draft Parks and Recreation Chapter completed as part of the Town's ongoing Comprehensive Plan Update, the Planning Board found that there was strong support for a facility of this type to be located somewhere in the Town. An online survey was conducted regarding citizen support for added recreation facilities and 80% responded that an indoor swimming pool was a top priority. In addition, Goal 2.2 of this Sports East Fitness Club Page 2 of 3 January 25, 2016 draft chapter contains an objective to research how to attract or create a sports complex that includes an indoor swimming pool and recognizes that this would require private funding to accomplish. The draft Parks and Recreation Chapter referenced above includes an objective in Goal 2.2 that notes an overuse of the playing fields already existing in Southold Town and calls for the creation of more soccer fields. The subject application includes two soccer fields. Also, Goal 4 of the chapter is to initiate a town-wide wellness campaign to improve physical and mental health. Adding opportunities like the proposed sports complex is consistent with this goal. Although this is a draft of a future comprehensive plan that has not yet been adopted by the Town Board, there was considerable public input that was favorable to the goals. Another indication of whether a proposed development is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan is how it fits into the current zoning. In this case, the use is considered by the Town's Building Department as fitting under the Special Exception section of 280-13 B as a membership club. Under that section of the zoning code, the use must meet certain conditions, all of which the Building Department found to be met as indicated by the Notice of Disapproval, dated December 12, 2015, which makes no mention of any variances required. The use exceeds, or is able to exceed all the requirements in the Town Code for such a facility, including the minimum property size and setbacks. Although the proposed project initially appears to be consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan, it is a large project for this town, and potential adverse impacts relating to the development and operation of this site must be examined to ensure they do not degrade the health, safety and welfare of the residents and neighbors. Potential adverse impacts, including but not limited to, traffic, noise and groundwater pollution must be investigated to determine their significance, and whether additional steps can be taken to mitigate or remove the impacts entirely. A Traffic Impact Study will provide information about the amount and intensity of traffic the site will generate and whether there is any way to mitigate traffic impacts. Creating turning lanes to alleviate backups on Route 25 is one common traffic mitigation strategy. It appears that the right-of-way width for Route 25 at this location is wide enough to accommodate turning lanes; however, this is an issue that would need to be reviewed by the New York State Department of Transportation. Noise can often be mitigated by distance and screening. The large size of the parcel will allow for setbacks that are much larger than the code requires and maximizing the distances to existing residences may provide mitigation to noise impacts. Potential groundwater pollution from septic system wastewater could be mitigated through advanced wastewater treatment systems now available and permitted by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. As mentioned above, the SEQR analysis will accomplish this investigation into the potential adverse impacts. Coordinating the SEQR review amongst the permitting Sports East Fitness Club Page 3 of 3 January 25, 2016 agencies, with the Planning Board respectfully requesting Lead Agency, is recommended. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this department. Date: 5-31-16 To Whom It May Concern: I wanted to send a letter in response to the letter you received from the planning board today in reference to Sports East and the next steps. We respect that the planning board is trying to be cautious in their process and that is understood. However this letter is overall misleading and going backwards so to say. From what I understand the planning board was in the middle of making their SEQRA determination and that is why we spent the last several months putting together the assets and information they needed in order to do so. I say this is going backwards because why is this letter being sent now? I was told that we should have expected a SEQRA determination at the June 6th meeting and now it is May 31St and that has been put on hold? The letter sent raises concerns that I guess were asked at the public hearing that the planning board held or at least some of those concerns were mentioned and not all that were listed in the letter you received from the planning board. These are concerns and not facts and that is the point of my letter to you today. From day one the owners and applicant of Sports East have been consistent, the site plan has not changed and what we are proposing within that site plan has not changed and we have never changed what we are proposing both in the ZBA hearing, the civic association public forum,the chamber of commerce public forum and then at the planning board hearing. We have stayed on point with what we are proposing. Both in public meetings and within any local paper or article we have always made sure that what we are saying is what we have proposed and put forth in our application to the planning board and ZBA. This is important as we need a special exemption under the code and we not only want to comply we also know that we fit within the rules that would allow a special exception. This letter you received from planning is exactly what I asked the planning board in the early stages of the process before any major funding was spent on the site plan process. The process we took was as followed 1. Received a letter of denial from Building Dept. 2. Submitted application to planning board with a sketch plan only and was told that we would have to go before the ZBA prior to submitting a full application 3. Submitted application to ZBA as a""Special exemption is required" and met before the ZBA were I was told that they would allow planning board to become lead agency and render a decision on the SEQRA review before the ZBA would make their ruling on the "special exception" 2 4. Submitted a full packet to the planning board which included a detailed site plan, landscape plan, septic plan, drainage plan, traffic study, letter stating we would do an alternative septic system, submitted to the SCHD and the NYSDOT for their comments and review all off which has cost us over$100,000 in order for an accurate SEQRA determination to be conducted by the planning board 5. Met with the ARB were they agreed with the overall application 6. Had a planning board public hearing May 6"'were there was a tremendous amount of support before the board, 4 people were against and'over 50 people were for it that showed up for the public hearing , at that meeting not one person voiced concerned about the the membership and how it is defined in the code" so not sure why that is in the letter SO MY MAIN QUESTION IS WHY IS THIS LETTER COMING NOW? THIS-DETERMINATION I THOUGHT WAS ALREADY AGREED UPON AT THE FIRST ZBA PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT THIS WAS AN ALLOWABLE USE UNDER THE CODE 280-13 B BUT NEEDED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION , IF THIS WAS NOT THE CASE THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CLEARLY DETERMINED BEFORE WE THE APPLICANT SPENT OVER$100,000 IN ORDER TO DO THE SEQRA,REVIEW, MY CONCERN IS THE MONEY SPENT, THE TIME SPENT AND NOW THIS LETTER AND THE TIMING OF THE LETTER??? I THOUGHT THE DECISION MAINLY COMES FROM THE SEQRA REVIEW AND THAT WE THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW THE CODE AND THE DEFINITION WHICH WE FULLY PLAN TO DO As we have stated from day one and here are the facts of what we are proposing 1. We are proposing a private annual membership based club 2. We are proposing both indoor and outdoor use 3. We are proposing this on more then 3 acres ofland 4. We will not exceed the allowable height requirements 5. This will be fior tennis, swimming, and recreation under a private club 6. This will be exclusive to members only that are paying annually 3 _ The letter states concerns and not facts so why is this even an issue, people that are against will raise all sorts of concerns but does that change the facts? Does that change what were is applying for and have stated over and over again? As an applicant this letter is concerning not only for the timing of it but also what it says � 1 It raises concerns such as 1. Will this be for teams and buses and commercial use, we have consistently stated that this is not the case nor is this allowed under the code, 2. Is weekly and monthly memberships allowed? We have never said this nor have we proposed this, yes we gave a monthly cost breakdown but that does not mean it.is a month membership it just gives an average cost per month for an annual based membership 3. Child day care? We have never stated child day care as if that was the intended use, my partner Joe Slovak mentioned we will offer'child day care but that does not mean it will be a day care center we will offer our members just like Laurel Links and North Fork Country clubs offers we will offer child training for sports, sports education, child day camps however that child must be a member and be part of•a family membership , similar to a golf clinic at the above mentioned clubs So I ask you to make your determination soon'so that-the planning board can get back to what we were all expecting them to be working on and that is the SEQRA review verses this late in the game question the code? As an applicant I don't even know.how this is possible this late in the game after all this money has been spent and public hearings have been held. I know first hand that the planning board has been working hard on this application and I must say overall the process has been very good and very black and white, however this letter totally has undermines what we as the applicants have said and the course of action that has been taken I would also like to mention and this is something we as the owners are proud of and that this has been very well received by the public, I would conservatively say that 85-90% of the Southold town residents are for, this, we have received endorsements from the PTA, Southold Town PBA, Fire Departments, Chamber-of Commerce, Lions Club,North Fork Wellness, Booster Club and a bunch of other important associations within our town; I would also like to point out the when it comes to SEQRA we have done everything in our power to reach a negative declaration as our proposal falls within all the areas to reach that declaration and have, 4 worked hard to be able to'allow the planning board to reach that decision when it comes to impact, traffic, setbacks and safety. The DOT and SCDH both have expressed positive comments on our application . a - Again I don't understand why this letter was sent by the planning board at this time, I thought that this decision was to be rendered by the ZBA once the planning board submitted the SEQRA determination. Can we meet immediately to review because this letter goes against the process, it undermines what we,have applied for and intend to do with Sports East and mentions concerns and not facts I want to also clearly state that I have'respect for the planning board and why they do what the do and their ` internal process, I want to clearly state that the planning board and staff has been professional and with this letter I am simply asking why? things that were stated within the'letter from the planning board to the zba it left me with no choice but to state the facts-of what we are applying for and proposing . The goal of my letter is to reiterate the facts of our,proposal Please let me know next steps, if we can meet meaning myself as applicant, the planning board representative and zba representative in a work session to discuss I thank you for your time Regards Paul Pawlowki Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax 5 Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax 6 Fuentes, Kim From: Fuentes, Kim Sent: Monday,June 06, 2016 2:42 PM � To: Eric Dantes; George Horning; Gerard Goehringer;Jerry Goehringer- 2nd'® Qpgnfli@gmail.com), Schneider, Kenneth;Weisman, Leslie ®� Subject: FW: Sports East Attachments: 2016_5_2 Public Meeting,Minutes.pdf,ATT00001.txt; 2016_5_2 Public Meeting Minutes.pdf FYI Kim E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 631-765-1809, Ex. 5011 -----Original Message----- From: paul pawlowski [mailto:pawlowskibiz@gmail.com] Sent: Monday,June 06, 20161:34 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; Cantrell, Elizabeth; Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; don(a@briarclifflandscape.com; Charles Cuddy; Charles Cuddy;Joe Slovak Subject: Sports East Hello please see link. http://suffolktimes.timesreview.com/2016/06/68206/proposed-mittituck-athletic-club-receives-its-first-approval/ Subject :Sports East To Whom: ZBA Chairperson and Planning Board , Hello Attached is the "draft minuted from the planning board public hearing dated May 2nd I am sending this to point out the facts There was 5 people that spoke against this project, There was 12 that spoke in favor the project, When I asked whom in the audience was for the project more,then 90 percent of the room raised their hands in favor. For a project this size 1 .7 u would say that only 3 showed up at the ZBA hearing against and 5 at the planning board and more then 100 showed up combined in favor. With a project of this size I would say that is good odds for the support of this project not to mention the endorsements we received from various associations in our town olq The concerns that were brought up were as follows from Denise Giess,Joy Ellinghouse,Julie Amper,Jill Shroeder,,Joe Lechner -traffic concerns -environmental impact and septic system -what type of club is it -this might be taken off tax roll in non for profit - noise -tree clearing -child day care -safety -nature of business After these people spoke they were told by the planning board chairman that most of these concerns would be handled through the SEQRA review? so again I question why has this been stopped? So these were the concerns that were brought up and these are different then what was written in the letter from the planning board to the ZBA? why are the concerns only written in that letter verse the many positive arguments made at that hearing? why aren't my responses to the questions in that letter? In all hearing and in this public hearing you can read that I clearly stated the following we have mitigated any seqra concerns,traffic issues, safety etc -we are a private club and not public -the noise will not exceed the main road traffic -this will not be taking off the tax roll -this will bean annual membership club with both indoor and outdoor sports -there are no endangered species on the property -there is no daily,weekly or monthly memberships -there will be no sports teams or buses I i I We have clearly stated and understand that this proposal falls clearly under the 280-13 B code for special exception,we have done our part,we have spent all the monies needed so the planning board can do SEQRA and we have no idea why this was haulted over a few concerns which are natural in a public hearing setting Answers are needed and should be given to us as we have done our part as the applicant and followed the rules and submitted the items needed . PLEASE KNOW THE CONCERNS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER TO ZBA ARE NOT FACTS AT ALL. i Again I ask that we can all meet to discuss this matter. I have now sent both public hearing minutes were we the applicant define what were are applying for. Alos we dont even know what the next steps are now that this process has been stopped? 2 �s Thank you Paul Pawlowski Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax i 3 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w`OF so P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ®V� lo Southold,NY 11971 Chair _ OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY G @ 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III '�� , (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR �CoU ��, Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtowimy.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �.CSVEID MEMORANDUM SAY To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson ZONI"G 130ARO OF APPIAlS Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Donald J. Wilcenski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Date: May 31, 2016 Re: Sports East Fitness Club Located at.9300 Route 25, ±141' s/w/o Sigsbee Road & NYS Route 25, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 The Planning Board has been reviewing the Site Plan application referenced above. On May 2, 2016, the Board conducted the public hearing, and during that hearing heard concerns about whether the use, as proposed, is permitted as.a Special Exception on this parcel. The Board would like to avoid having the applicant invest any more funds into this application until that question is answered definitively by the Zoning Board of Appeals. To that end, we would appreciate your response at your earliest convenience. In the Planning Board's record are questions from the public about whether the use, as described by the applicant, is truly a membership club. Several people asked how such an apparently intense commercial use could be allowed in a residential zone, and if the intent of the annual membership club was to allow something like the project being proposed. They also questioned some of the finer points of how the club would work, including whether a day care or childcare was allowed, and whether soccer teams that weren't members would be allowed to play on the fields. For your convenience, we have attached a copy of the draft minutes from the Planning Board's hearing. The Planning Board, after reviewing the Town Code, and various definitions in the code, questioned whether the use, as proposed, could be considered an annual membership club. They are concerned about tournaments or special events that bring in a lot of non- members as participants and spectators, for example a soccer tournament with teams that aren't members, or a regional tennis tournament with outside teams. Would this then make the facility public and not an annual membership club? Also, if the public is allowed to pay for a membership that is less than a full year (a daily, weekly or monthly membership), should that be allowed when the use is listed in 280-13 B (7) as an Southold Town Planning-tsoard Page 2 May 31, 2016 "annual membership club"? The Town Code sections reviewed by the Board are included below: § 280-13 B states that a Special Exception use includes: (7) Beach clubs, tennis clubs, country clubs, golf clubs and annual membership clubs and accessory playgrounds, beaches, swimming pools, tennis courts, recreational buildings and maintenance buildings catering exclusively to members and their guests, subject to the following requirements: (a) No building or part thereof or any parking or loading area shall be located within 100 feet of any street line or within 50 feet of any lot line. (b) The total area covered by principal and accessory buildings shall not exceed 20% of the area of the lot. (c) No such use shall occupy a lot with an area of less than three acres. In § 280-4 Definitions, there is this definition for a membership club: CLUB, MEMBERSHIP OR COUNTRY OR GOLF An entity established for the principal purpose of engaging in outdoor sports, such as golf, tennis, swimming, fishing, hunting or similar activities, but not including any form of aviation, outdoor trap, skeet'or target shooting or motorboat racing. There are also in § 280-4 these definitions, neither of which appear as uses permitted in the R-80 zoning district: RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Recreational uses characterized by predominately outdoor activities by patrons, including but not limited to stables and riding academies, regulation golf courses and golf-related activities, tennis and racquet sport clubs, platform sports, baseball batting and pitching cages and swimming pool facilities. It shall not include such activities as racing, jai alai and amusements parks. RECREATION FACILITY, COMMERCIAL An indoor or outdoor privately operated business involving playing fields, courts, arenas or halls designed to accommodate sports and recreational activities, such as billiards, bowling, dance halls, gymnasiums, health spas, skating rinks, shooting ranges, tennis courts and swimming pools. Does the use as proposed meet the definition of a membership club, and fit the described use in 280-13 of an annual membership club? Prior to any further review of this Site Plan application, the Planning Board is requesting this question be answered by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their earliest convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. We look forward to your response. Please call with any questions. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �Qf S0(/ly P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ®� Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY G ® @ 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH MARTIN H.IDOR < AOUNT�,� a (cor.Main SoutholdYoungs Ave.) NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Donald J. Wilcenski, Planning Board Chairman Members of the Planning Board Date: May 31, 2016 Re: Public Meeting Minutes Attached is the section of the draft minutes from the Southold Town Planning Board's May 2, 2016 Public Meeting that pertain to Sports East Fitness Club. Thank you. Encl. T ��V gapttv s QN10 � . Jo-Ann Lechner 1415 Marlene Lane Mattituck, NY April 27,2016 Dear Nls. Leslie Weisman-Chair Zoning Board of Appeals: I am writing to you because I have great concerns regarding the development of the 20+acre parcel of land owned by Mr. Paul Pawlowski and the proposal by him and his partners to develop this property into the Sports East Fitness endeavor. Mr. Pawlowski is in the process of requesting-that special exception be given under the special exception standard. I have read his application and attended the April 25th monthly meeting of the Mattituck Laurel Civic Association which only adds to my concems and more questions. My thoughts are based upon reading, research and attending the MLCA meeting. Nature_of Business: What is this the nature of this Business? We now know that this facility will be a not-for-profit entity. The proposed developed property will be taken off the real estate tax rolls. Mr, Pawlowski answered this question at the meeting. He stated he is not asking the town to help develop this property,therefore indicating a not- for-profit entity should not be a problem. He and his partners will be using all of the Towns Services, making a very good mturn on their investment rind paying no Federal, State and Local Taxes. This proposed project has been called a Membership Club;a Private Sports Club,and an Athletic Club. Which is it? There are 244 parking spaces which the partner's project will be filled. A question was asked regarding bringing in outside teams to compete on the multiple courts.The response was that no teams will be brought in.There will be 5 outdoor tennis courts,one artificial turf field as well as a vast indoor facility. It was also stated that the teachers are very happy because they will have summer jobs. The Full Environmental Assessment Form provides:"Will the proposed action plan produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,operation or both." Response was"Yes;Outdoor multi use field and tennis courts will produce noise exceeding ambient noise levels during operation. It is likely that these noise levels would be generated between 7:00 am-6:00 pm." At this time there appears to be no outdoor lighting for the courts. However, it was stated that the outside courts will be open as long as there is daylight. This means during the summer when neighbors are trying to enjoy their yards or just home from work wanting quiet time the courts and field will be open until the sun goes down. The developers stated that they are!modeling the facility after Southampton Youth Services recreation center. Southampton offers summer camp that is run by an outside organization. Based upon,the number of parking spaces; modeling their program after Southampton Youth Services,a not-for-profit; providing jobs for teachers during the summer,the vast outside fields as well as the size of this entire project; no intermural with schools etc.,this could lead to-the conclusion that this endeavor will have a full summer camp up and running on this property,as does Southampton Youth Services. There would be constant noise from sunup until sundown. Mr. Pawlowski, has stated this is a private membership club. What does annual membership club really mean? It appears that any business that offers annual membership can open on property that has a zoning of residential with exceptions. For example BJs, Costco, Sam's Club are all membership driven. Any type of business can offer annual membership and say they are membership driven and will be:beneficial to the community. Is this really what the town's forefathers were thinking when they placed the exemption for annual membership clubs? If the town approves this project on this land, it is opening up Pandora's Box,as any large business with any type of membership can and will ultimately apply and or bring litigation against the town for the right to build on residential property that is also zoned for exceptions. J 1 Sewage and Water: The project is huge and will produce an enormous amount of sewage and-water runoff from blacktop, building roof and the outdoor courts. Our bay and sound are already compromised by nitrogen pollution. Excessive nitrogen pollution from sewage has caused massive fish kills,turtle die offs,and toxic algae blooms, closing beaches and water bodies around Long Island. Nitrogen pollution threatens our environment, health, economy,and quality of life. Long Island's clean waters cneaile jobs and generate hundreds of millions of dollars every year for our regional economy. Nitrogen pollution in water is directly tied to development patterns, land use trends,fertilizer use,failing sewers , residential cesspools,and septic systems. In short—the majority of nitrogen is from sewage.Scientists agree that harmful toxic tides are being fueled by nitrogen from wastewater, including septic tanks and cesspools. The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation cites algal blooms and excessive nitrogen as the primary reasons many of Long Island's water bodies are impaired.These toxic algal blooms,often referred to as Red Tide or Brown Tide,can spread hazardous toxins, kill fish,and seriously impair water quality. In the spring of 2015, Governor Cuomo and the NYS Legislature allocated$5 million to create a plan that wild tackle Long Island's nitrogen pollution problem.This plan will identify critical projects,including upgrades to sewage and septic systems,which are necessary to protect our water resources and our communities. Newsday ran three articles this week regarding how water ways need more environmental protection from sewage. These include Suffolk County as well as the Town of Brookhaven who wants to implement standards that will be stronger than the County, There have been meetings of our elected officials from the state,county and towns;they understand if nitrogen pollution is not reduced our towns vie will lose two industries,fishing and tourism. This proposed project is very close to Peconic Bay and Laurel Preserve. According to the papers filed,this project does adjoin wetlands/water bodies that are regulated by Federal,State or Local Agencies and are over a sole source aquifer.The project anticipates a water usage of 15,000 gallons a day and 3,660 of raw sewage. How can we justify putting this enormous project in place when it will greatly increase nitrogen pollution from,sewage and water runoff with no way to eliminate nitrogen pollution? Will there be a treatment;plant established to take all nitrogen out of the sewage before it is returned to the groQnd? Will there be some type of water system where water can be captured, purified,and recycled? This proposed project requires substantial water. Therea is a water problem on tale east end. Salt water is seeping into fresh. Last year the Town of Riverhead requested that its'residence curtail wafter,usage as their pumps were at maximum capacity. With the pull of so much water, how does the Town accommodate this project and protect our drinking water? Traffic; Noise;Air Pollution:Traffic Congestion-This area of Main St. is so congested it is almost impossible to get into and out of streets and parking lots.The Old Capital One building must be taken into consideration. This business property is sub-dividable and multi-use. There is also going to be additional traffic from the location of the Hudson City Bank site with the potential 2 story office building. The Department of Transportation would not approve any,entrances or exits from the CVS parking lot on to Main Road because of congestion. This project will substantially add to the traffic congestion that already exists in this area. Why are the entrances and exits not on the side road that runs along the westward side of this property? This part of a Main Road resembles Riverhead with its'traffic congestion. I do not believe the Town of Southold would want to add to the congestion in this area which would affect all residence. Air—There will be increased emissions from buses,cars,delivery and garbage trucks entering and exiting the parking lois,as well as from the additional traffic on 25. There will also be increased emissions from these vehicles' sitting in the parking lot with their engines running. This must be taken into consideration with 244 parking spaces. Approximately 7 acres of trees will be removed. Removal of these trees will have<en adverse impact to the community.via air and noise pollution. Trees cool the air,land and water with shade;and moisture thus reduce the heat island effect of our communities.A single tree can produce the cooling effect of 10 room size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day. One large tree can supply a day's supply of oxygen for four people. A healthy tree can store 13 pounds of carbon each year which reduces the"greenhouse effect",for an acre of trees that equals to.2.6 tons of carbon dioxide. Trees help reduce surface water runoff,decrease soil erosion and increase ground lorater recharge. Each gallon of gasoline burned produces almost 20 pounds of carbon. There are 244 parking spaces. How many more pounds of carbon will be produced in this one small area that has more traffic congestion than it can handle. Noise-The project will be open all week at 5:00 am;close Monday—Saturday at 10:00 pm;Sunday close is 7:00 pm. Outdoor fields will be available,at this time until dark. Plans have been made for,244 vehicles. There will be buses,delivery trucks,garbage trucks, cars and increased traffic. The trees that are left standing uuill block some of the noise, but they will not block all of the vehicle&pedestrian noise until dark at the field and 10:00 pm for the building. Wliat will happen to the quality of life of the individuals who live in our community? Wildlife and Plants: From the application for zoning under the exception rule,the application provides,"Does the project;sit(';contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of special concern." The applicant responded"Yes."Observing this property from Sigsbee, I have seen a turtle and a very strange snake living on this land.What happens to these animals or species of plants either listed or not listed via NYS's as rare or concerned? Conclusion: -The plan for this project is huge. This project will produce much traffic congestion,sewage,water runoff, noise;all environmental polluters. The quality of life will not be the same for the families who live and travel around this area of Mattituck. I thought the people of our Town wanted to keep"that small town feeling"which includes is for our neighbors,as well as keeping the two industries that add to our Towns coffer, namely tourism and fishing. These industries afford the Town with march of its revenues,with very little town services and in turn reduces every residences real estate taxes. Our Town is trying to cut pollution as it is causing destruction of our estuary and ecological systems which affects all residence of the Town of Southold. How is the Town going to address this vast project with forward thinking? This project,a not-for-profit,will have the availability of all Town Services paid for by Town residence,as the property will be taken off the tax rolls and the principals will benefit financially at the expense of the Town residences,,many whom are on a fixed income. The Southampton Youth Services recreation center is not near a residential areas or a congested area. Maximus gym is also located in a business district. This project should only be allowed if placed in a business zone,all environmental issues must be addresseJ and every residence agrees to have a substantial tax increase. Many of the services that:this endeavor provides are already provided by our Schools and Parks,which are paid for by real estate taxes. Suffolk Community Colle�ga is at the final stage of providing a gym physicality which includes a pool. This land once developed would be an ideal hang out for teenagers as it is enclosed b trees. Will there b �'.4 hour p 9 9 Y Y guard service to stop the congregation of teenagers with and without cars? Based upon the facts above, I respectfully request that this application should be denied. Respectfully, ,� Ao-An�e�'6�� I I�r Ir i i bl�l►� . ZCEIIVMI Fuentes, Kim S--ffiOPA JUN 0 6 2016 From: Fuentes, Kim 13Y. I Serit: Friday,June 03, 2016 8:42 AM To: Eric Dantes; George Horning; Gerard Goehringer;Jerry Goehringer- 2nd Qpgrifli@gmail.com); Schneider, Kenneth;Weisman, Leslie Subject: ZBA#6914 - Sports East - Paul Pawlowski Please see below i I " Kim-E. Fuentes Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 631-765-1809, Ez. 5011 From: paul pawlowski [mailto:pawlowskibiz@gmail.com] _ Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 7:40 AM To: Fuentes, Kim; Cantrell,,Elizabeth; Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; don@briarclifflandscape.com; Charles Cuddy; Charles Cuddy; Joe Slovak; Chris Dwyer Subject: Subject: Sports East j To Whom is May Concern within the ZBA and Planning Board I am writing you again for several reasons , first I have not had one response from emails earlier in the week II when asking if we can have a meeting, I ask this cause we simply do not know what will happen next and when? . Second not sure if you have heard yet but the Suffolk county Planning Commission has fully endorsed the proposal, they went as far as mentioning the location and the zoning in which the project would be, that is positive as it is nice that they realize the importance this project is to our local community. Third, I must say since reading that letter and having time to digest this all I am at a loss for words, my partners and the professionals that have helped me with this application such as the engineers, legal experts and county reviewers are at a loss for words. As the applicant and the one that has put up all the money to get to this point can't not express my concern enough with this letter that was written to the ZBA. I say this because the first i I - question I asked the planning board on day one before any money was spent and time lost was is this allowable under the code, I even sat with the building inspector and the planning board to find this out. I was told that it fits under the-code with a special exception as defined. � I was told what we are asking for and have applied for fits under the code. I then went ahead with a sketch plan and submitted an application and once again I asked 4 the same question and I received the same answer. We then had a very positive ZBA public hearing and were told to go back to planning and submit the needed assets to reach a seqra determination. This along with the knowledge of my professional team gave the partners of sports east the confidence to move forward and spend the necessary funds to get this site plan approved through the process that a Southold town resident must go { through and is within right to do. That's what's so upsetting is that the money is spent and the time has been put in and this letter totally goes against everything I was told and the due process that we as residents and applicants are entitledto. That letter mentioned things that have nothing to do with our application and is not what we have applied. I must be honest with you I feel as if there is a"phantom"pressure that is being put on the planning board, I feel that someone doesn't want to see this project happen and this someone has put pressure on the planning board all of a sudden. This greatly concerns me as a person who has been around site plans and zoning for all my life and more importantly as a resident that expects nothing but professionalism and a non bias audience when working with the planners of the town that I live in. I say this because this entire process has been fair, professional and all planners involved have been very helpful and we as applicants have worked hard to put j forth a solid and just site plan and proposal. Then this letter to the zba happens??? i I ask that we meet or I ask that we continue the process with the planning board and get through the SEQRA determination and then proceed as planned. This is the process that should be done , expected and what we the applicant was told. If there is a"phantom pressure"please do not let this pressure control what is right, what you as planning and zoning boards have worked hard at. As applicants we will do everything in our legal power to find out who or what this "phantom"pressure is and we will continue with this application for as long as it takes to get approved. I personally say this with confidence because I would have never moved past a sketch plan if I didn't think we were well within right, well within the code and most importantly that this was a project to enhance the quality of life for our town. The positive response that we have received and numbers that want this verses do not want this is inspiring and will give myself and my partners the energy to keep going. If this I was just-another site plan for a retail building or a commercial site it would be different but this is something that we are truly doing for others and not ourselves. Please I ask you to put this back on the proper course of action,or at the very least let me know what the next steps are Paul Pawlowski , partner of Sports-East - 2 I - Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax i i 3 /340 Fuentes, Kim From: Paul Pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,June 03, 2016 10:18 AM To: Lanza, Heather; Chris Dwyer;joe;Cummings, Brian A.; don@ briarclifflandscape.com; CharlesCuddy@optonline.net; Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Fuentes, Kim; Cantrell, Elizabeth. Subject: Fwd: Sports East-SC Planning Commission report I Attachments: D00060316-001.pdf,ATT00001.htm Please see attached �U Please review staff analysis by the commission Also note we have stated and shown we are willing to do all the recommendation that noted. Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: 1 From: "Charles Cuddy"<CharlesCuddy@Optonline.Net> Date:June 3, 2016 at 9:37:24 AM EDT To: "'paul pawlowski"' <pawlowslcibiz@gmail.com> Subject:Sports East-SC Planning Commission report Reply-To: <CharlesCuddV@Optonline.Net> Paul: Attached is a staff report from the Suffolk County Planning Commission recommending approval.The report was adopted and approved at June 1 meeting. Charles R. Cuddy j Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 631-369-8200 631-369-9080 fax charlescuddy@optonline.net I 1 i COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Z-4 WHO Steven Bellone _ SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Department of Economic Development and Planning Joanne Minieri Division of Planning Deputy County Executive and Commissioner and Environment STAFF REPORT SECTIONS Al 4-14 THRU A14-24 OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Applicant: Sports East Fitness Club Municipality: Southold Location: . South side of Main Road(NYS Rte.25)—141 'west of Sigbee Rd. Received: 4/28/2016 k File Number: SD-16-01 T.P.I.N.: 1000 12200 0700 009000 Jurisdiction: Adjacent to NYS Rte.25 ZONING DATA ■ Zoning Classification: R-80 ■ Minimum Lot Area: 80,000.Sq.Ft. ■ Section 278: N/A ■ Obtained Variance: N/A - SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION f Within Agricultural District: No ■ Shoreline Resource/Hazard Consideration: No j Received Health Services Approval: No ■ Property Considered for Affordable Housing Criteria: No ■ Property has Historical/Archaeological Significance: No ■ Property Previously Subdivided: No ■ Property Previously Reviewed by Planning Commission: No ■ Minority or Economic Distressed No SITE DESCRIPTION ■ Present Land Use: vacant ■ Existing Structures: none ■ General Character of Site: level ■ Range of Elevation within Site: 20-30'amsl ■ Cover: wooded,some clearing ■ Soil Types: Plymouth series 4 Suffolk County Planning Commission I June 1,2016 I - F . I Range of Slopes(Soils Map): 0-8% ■ Waterbodies or Wetlands: none NATURE OF SUBDIVISION/NATURE OF MUNICIPAL ZONING REQUEST ■ Type: commmercial recreation site plan �� L • Layout: standard h • Area of Tract: 20.82Acres ■ Yield Map. o No.of Lots: 1 ACCESS ■ Roads: Main Road(NYS Rte.25) ■ Driveways: private on site ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION ■ Stormwater Drainage o Design of System: CB/LP o Recharge Basins no ■ Groundwater Management Zone: IV ■ Water Supply: public ■ Sanitary Sewers: alternative low profile leaching galleys PROPOSAL DETAILS OVERVIEW—Applicants seek site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for a proposed multi-sport membership club consisting of an outdoor soccer field and five (5)tennis courts,an 82,500 SF building to include a pool,basketball court,soccerfield and space for physical - ' fitness activities. The proposal also includes approximately 12.86 acres of open space area. The 20.8 acres subject property is located on the South side of Main Road (NYS Rte. 25) approximately 141 'west of Sigbee Rd.in the hamlet of Laurel. The subject property Is zoned R-80 (Residential; minimum lot size 80,000SF). The proposal conforms to the Town of Southold's R-80 district's set back requirements,lot coverage,open space, and maximum height requirements. The site plan application also provides 240 parking spaces which is in conformance with the Town of Southold's parking requirements. The subject property is currently a vacant wooded lot with some clearing to the central-southwest of the property. The proposed recreation club will be supplied potable water by the Suffolk County Water Authority. Sanitary waste water is proposed to be collected on site by a subsurface sanitary system using alternative low profile leaching galleys in order to increase the distance between the leaching structure and the effective depth to the ground water table. The subsurface sanitary system is to be designed and built in accordance with SCDHS standards. All storm water drainage is proposed to be contained on site via a subsurface drainage system comprised of precast concrete catch basins,leaching pools and permeable areas(crushed stone). Prior to final site plan approval,a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)will be approved by the Town. Suffolk County Pkamg Commission 2 June 1,2016 Vehicular access to the proposed recreation club is to be from one un-signalized ingress/stop controlled egress to NYS Rte.25 at the far southern end of the subject property and one right turn �� ^ i only(east bound)egress to NYS Rte.25 at the north end of the subject property. The subject property is not located in a County regulated Pine Barrens zone or in a New York State Critical Environmental Area. The site encompasses no fresh water wetland areas.The development parcel is not located in a Special Ground Water Protection Area. The project site is located in Suffolk County Ground Water Management Zone IV. The subject property is located in an area mixed with residential,commercial,horse farming,and open space uses. STAFF ANALYSIS GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW CONSIDERATIONS: New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-1 provides for the Suffolk County Planning Commission to consider inter-community issues. Included are such issues as compatibility of land uses, community character, public convenience and maintaining a satisfactory community environment. The proposed development appears to be compatible with the existing land uses in the area. Immediately adjacent to the proposed developed is a mix of farmland uses (horses)and single family residential properties. The proposed recreation facility includes wooded buffers between it and neighbors to the east,south and west. Exterior lighting at the recreation facility is intended to be dark sky compliant. LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: The Town of Southold is currently working on its Comprehensive Plan Southold 2020. The Town's 2004 Comprehensive Waterfront Revitalization Plan does indicate"residential"for future use of the subject property. It is noted that tennis clubs,annual membership clubs,swimming pools and recreational buildings are permitted special exception uses in the R-80 zone. SUFFOLK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION GUIDELINE CONSIDERATIONS: The Suffolk County Planning Commissions has identified six general Critical County Wide Priorities that include: 1. Environmental Protection 2. Energy efficiency 3. Economic Development,Equity and Sustainability 4. Housing Diversity 5. Transportation and 6. Public Safety These policies are reflected in the Suffolk County Planning Commission Guidebook(unanimously adopted July 11,2012). Below are items for consideration regarding the above policies: As indicated previously,all wastewaterfrom the proposed Sports East Recreation Club project is to be accommodated by a subsurface sanitary system using alternative low profile leaching galleys in order to increase the distance between the leaching structure and the effective depth to the ground water table. Advanced wastewater treatment including the possibility of innovative/alternative systems is appropriate for this site and continued review and dialogue with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is warranted Suffolk County Planning Commission 3 June 1,2016 Storm water runoff from the proposed project will be retained on-site and recharged via a drainage p q system designed to conform to all applicable Town requirements. This system will Include a Vp�, subsurface drainage system comprised of precast concrete catch basins, leaching pools and permeable areas(crushed stone).It is the belief of staff that opportunities exist on site to incorporate additional best management practices to the treatment of storm water runoff. The petitioners should be encouraged to review the Suffolk County Planning Commission publication Managing Stormwater-Natural Vegetation and Green Methodologies and incorporate into the proposal,where practical,design elements contained therein. Proposed clearing of the subject property of native woodland for the recreation facility is limited to approximately 38%of the subject site and is relatively close to the Commission clearing guideline for R-80 residentially zoned land (35%)for sensitive woodland habitat such as Pine Barrens. The subject site is not pine barren or any listed critical environmental habitat.It is the belief of the staff that with native vegetative landscaping the proposal is in accordance with best practices for greenfield development. There was not information in the referral materials indicating that the project will incorporate energy efficiency into the site design.The petitioners should be encouraged to review the Suffolk County Planning Commission Guidebook particularly with respect to energy efficiency and incorporate where practical,elements contained therein forthe residential and community center components of the development. The applicant has putforth in submitted materials that the Sports East Recreation Club will not result in a substantial increase to traffic above present levels or generate a substantial new demand for transportation facilities or services. The applicant indicates that a traffic impact study will be prepared to address any increase in traffic or congestion. The study once completed is to be submitted to the NYS DOT for review. Suffolk County Bus Transit route SC-92 runs along Main Road (NYS Route 25). The applicant should contact Suffolk County Transit to coordinate bus service to the proposed development. Little discussion is made in the petition to the Town and referred to the Commission on public safety and universal design. The applicant should review the Planning Commission guidelines particularly related to public safety and universal design and incorporate into the proposal, where practical, design elements contained therein. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the site plan for The Sports East Fitness Club with the following comments: 1. Advanced wastewater treatment including the possibility of innovative/alternative nitrogen reducing systems are appropriate for this proposed development and the petitioner should be directed to continue dialogue with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services regarding the use of innovative alternative wastewater treatment for the proposed development. 2. The applicant should be encouraged to review the Suffolk County Planning Commission publication on Managing Stormwater-Natural Vegetation and Green Methodologies and incorporate into the proposal,where practical,design elements contained therein. 3. The applicant should be encouraged to review the Suffolk County Planning Commission Guidebook particularly with respect to energy efficiency and incorporate where practical, applicable elements contained therein. Suffolk County Planning Commission 4 June 1,2016 4. A traffic impact study should be prepared to address any increase in traffic or congestion to NYS Rte.25.The study once completed should be submitted to the NYS DOT for review. e 5. Suffolk County Bus Transit route SC-92 runs along Main Road (NYS Route 25). The applicant should contact Suffolk County Transit to coordinate bus service to the proposed development. 6. The applicant should review the Planning Commission guidelines particularly related to public safety and incorporate into the proposal,where practical,design elements contained therein. 7. The applicant should review the Planning Commission guidelines particularly related to universal design and incorporate into the proposal, where practical, design elements contained therein. Suffolk County Planning Commission 5 June 1,2016 to MENA If NaVI AM ISH 4 r, sl ia�y-�"9Fja All N. � �= a 1w is,, 'ki; ni ,nN IEl��ly -I.',lu II�If I I n + 1 I I � I!'tl�,1I poll .-, .-Py``I ap s it Iii iL li� lid'I ill i�Ili I i s ; r �7 I'ttuuaaHill r �I ;v mill `! ,ifil y�L 'ti'`l` t' IIERI 5�PYR It if E ' U' g+ � Suffolk County Planning Commission ( June 1,2016 5 0 .. agbe RoadSl , b _ n I I. ...! ! f I�� •,J GRN;;, , ,;�,�, , � � en.��4 � fir. �•T.-F e:; i �-� � �^;�, i ��.:�:, i _ � v:-.:. �s�^��i �r., �r�.m, i a����M• � �r r ��r�: a,.._��z:�s�. ' w�a, PROPOSED BUIt111NG r� � �"`'��---�""`�f—1."•�ria�i:.,i,,:�'r���iv_.._,..-.._-«wease���I'J ����-�c=as�z :+'rmi,.•+-.-..-.•., ��y.,l Main Road Stale(In Feet) a 60 120 I o Al- 3 � 3�E p a`. 66101-F2015 04:04 6313659080 CHARLES CUDDY PAGE 91x'02 1 CHARLES R. CUDDY ATTORNEY AT LAW JUN 0 2 2016 445 GRIFFING AVENUE = RIVERHEAD,NY 11901ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS charlescuddy@optontine.net Tel.(631)369-8200 Fax(631)369-9080 June 1,2016 , t Donald J.Wllcenski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board PQ Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sports East Fitness Club Located at 9300 Route 25,Mattituck SL-tM##1000-127-7-9 Dar Mr.Wilcenski: I received a copy of your memorandum to the Zoning Board of Appeals dated May 31,2016. It is finely crafted and is innocent in form-but damming in substance. It effectively is a brief in opposition to a widely acclaimed application. I attended the Planning Board hearing and read the minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing,and do not find the specific issues highlighted in the memorandum were raised by anyone. The memorandum is entirely negative. It relies on unsupportive speculation by a handful of opponents. It ignores the surrounding zoning,fails to note the commercial nature of the Main Road,overlooks the -` minimum site clearance and significant preserve area,and does not recognize the basis for denial by the Building Department. The Planning Board has before a site plan unchanged and a request for a SEQRA determination. Whether that determination should be delegated to another Board is a serious question,but be that as it may,SEQRA should be determined and the special exception process should proceed. For the record and as stated by the applicant,this is an annual membership dub;it is a use similar to other uses permitted by special exception in the R80 zone; no day care is offered; no outside teams are to be allowed- It is difficult to believe this is a use different than other special exception uses. r 3 1•' 06/01/2016 04:04 6313699060 CHARLES CUDDY PA13E 02/02 r Donald J.wilcenski,Chairman June 1,2016 Page 2 What caused this memorandum to be written is of great concern to the applicant. It undermines the . application before the Zoning Board and whether acknowledged or not,it is a veiled attempt to .3 h influence another Board's proceedings and deliberation. This is most unlike the Southold Town Planning a, Board and cannot be justified_ 4. Very truly yours, Charles R.Cuddy r CRC/pc cc, Leslie Weisman,ZBA Chairperson Members of the zoning Board of Appeals 1 l • F Mentes, Ki m From: paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 7:28 PM To: Toth,Vicki; Fuentes, Kim;Joe Slovak; Charles Cuddy, Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; don@briarclifflandscape.com Subject: Sports East D To: ZBA Chairperson JUN O 1 2016 BY.- LCL --- Frgm: Sports East Applicant Date: 5-31-16 To Whom It May Concern: I wanted to send a letter in response to the letter you received from the planning board today in reference to Sports East and the next steps. We respect that the planning board is trying to be cautious in their process and that is understood. However this letter is overall misleading and going backwards so to say. From what I understand the planning board was in the middle of malting their SEQRA determination and that is why we spent the last several months putting together the assets and information they needed in order to do so. I say this is going backwards because why is this letter being sent now? I was told that we should have expected a SEQRA determination at the June 6th meeting and now it is May 31St and that has been put on hold? The letter sent raises concerns that I guess were asked at the public hearing that the planning board held or at least some of those concerns were mentioned and not all that were listed in the letter you received from the planning board. These are concerns and not facts and that is the point of my letter to you today. From day one the owners and applicant of Sports East have been consistent, the site plan has not changed and what we are proposing within that site plan has not changed and we have never changed what we are proposing both in the ZBA hearing, the civic association public forum, the chamber of commerce public forum and then at the planning board hearing. We have stayed on point with what we are proposing. Both in public meetings and within any local paper or article we have always made sure that what we are saying is what we have proposed and put forth in our application to the planning board and ZBA. This is important as we need a special exemption under the code and we not only want to comply we also know that we fit within the rules that would allow a special exception. This letter you received from planning is exactly what I asked the planning board in the early stages of the process before any major funding was spent on the site plan process. 1 The process we took was as followed 1. Received a letter of denial from Building Dept. 2. Submitted application to planning board with a sketch plan only and was told that we would have to go before the ZBA prior to submitting a full application 3. Submitted application to ZBA as a""Special exemption is required" and met before the ZBA were I was told that they would allow planning board to become lead agency and render a decision on the SEQRA review before the ZBA would make their ruling on the "special exception" 4. Submitted a full packet to the planning board which included a detailed site plan, landscape plan, septic plan, drainage plan, traffic study, letter stating we would do an alternative septic system, submitted to the SCHD and the NYSDOT for their comments and review all off which has cost us over $100,000 in order for an accurate SEQRA determination to be conducted by the planning board 5. Met with the ARB were they agreed with the overall application 6. Had a planning board public hearing May 6th were there was a tremendous amount of support before the board, 4 people were against and over 50 people were for it that showed up for the public hearing , at that meeting not one person voiced concerned about the the membership and how it is defined in the code" so not sure why that is in the letter SO MY MAIN QUESTION IS WHY IS THIS LETTER COMING NOW? THIS DETERMINATION I THOUGHT WAS ALREADY AGREED UPON AT THE FIRST ZBA PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT THIS WAS AN ALLOWABLE USE UNDER THE CODE 280-13 B BUT NEEDED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION, IF THIS WAS NOT THE CASE THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CLEARLY DETERMINED BEFORE WE THE APPLICANT SPENT OVER$100,000 IN ORDER TO DO THE SEQRA REVIEW, MY CONCERN IS THE MONEY SPENT, THE TIME SPENT AND NOW THIS LETTER AND THE TIMING OF THE LETTER??? I THOUGHT THE DECISION MAINLY COMES FROM THE SEQRA REVIEW AND THAT WE THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW THE CODE AND THE DEFINITION WHICH WE FULLY PLAN TO DO As we have stated from day one and here are the facts of what we are proposing 2 1. We are proposing a private annual membership based club 2. We are proposing both indoor and outdoor use 3. We are proposing this on more then 3 acres of land 4. We will not exceed the allowable height requirements 5. This will be for tennis, swimming, and recreation under a private club 6. This will be exclusive to members only that are paying annually The letter states concerns and not facts so why is this even an issue, people that are against will raise all sorts of concerns but does that change the facts? Does that change what were is applying for and have stated over and over again? As an applicant this letter is concerning not only for the timing of it but also what it says It raises concerns such as 1. Will this be for teams and buses and commercial use, we have consistently stated that this is not the case nor is this allowed under the code, 2. Is weekly and monthly memberships allowed? We have never said this nor have we proposed this, yes we gave a monthly cost breakdown but that does not mean it is a month membership it just gives an average cost per month for an annual based membership 3. Child day care? We have never stated child day care as if that was the intended use, my partner Joe Slovak mentioned we will offer child day care but that does not mean it will be a day care center we will offer our members just like Laurel Links and North Fork Country clubs offers we will offer child training for sports, sports education, child day camps however that child must be a member and be part of a family membership , similar to a golf clinic at the above mentioned clubs 3 So I ask you to make your determination soon so that the planning board can get back to what we were all expecting them to be working on and that is the SEQRA review verses this late in the game question the code? As an applicant I don't even know how this is possible this late in the game after all this money has been spent and public hearings have been held. I know first hand that the planning board has been working hard on this application and I must say overall the process has been very good and very black and white, however this letter totally has undermines what we as the applicants have said and the course of action that has been taken I would also like to mention and this is something we as the owners are proud of and that this has been very well received by the public, I would conservatively say that 85-90% of the Southold town residents are for this, we have received endorsements from the PTA, Southold Town PBA, Fire Departments, Chamber of Commerce, Lions Club,North Fork Wellness, Booster Club and a bunch of other important associations within our town, I would also like to point out the when it comes to SEQRA we have done everything in our power to reach a negative declaration as our proposal falls within all the areas to reach that declaration and have worked hard to be able to allow the planning board to reach that decision when it comes to impact, traffic, setbacks and safety. The DOT and SCDH both have expressed positive comments on our application . Again I don't understand why this letter was sent by the planning board at this time, I thought that this decision was to be rendered by the ZBA once the planning board submitted the SEQRA determination. Can we meet immediately to review because this letter goes against the process, it undermines what we have applied for and intend to do with Sports East and mentions concerns and not facts I want to also clearly state that I have respect for the planning board and why they do what the do and their internal process, I want to clearly state that the planning board and staff has been professional and with this letter I am simply asking why? things that were stated within the letter from the planning board to the zba it left me with no choice but to state the facts of what we are applying for and proposing . The goal of my letter is to reiterate the facts of our proposal Please let me know next steps, if we can meet meaning myself as applicant, the planning board representative and zba representative in a work session to discuss I thank you for your time 4 Regards Paul Pawlowki Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax 5 Fuentes, Kim From: paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:35 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; Cantrell, Elizabeth; Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Lanza, Heather, Cummings, Brian A.;don@briarclifflandscape.com; Charles Cuddy; Charles Cuddy;Joe Slovak Attachments: ZBA-02042016 Hearing highlighted 2.pdf Hello, ZBA and Planning Along with my letter I will be highlighting exactly what was said by the partners of Sports East from day 1 when it comes to items mentioned in that letter from Planning board to the ZBA today I think it is very important that what is said on public record by the partners of Sports East has been consistent from day 1 Attached is the minutes from the first public hearing with the ZBA , highlighted in yellow are comments made by members of the board that are important compared to the concerns from that letter sent by the planning board and items highlighted in blue are the comments and responses from partners of sports east . ,These responses and comments rebuke the concerns from the letter I will be putting together all the articles in the paper and I will do the same from the minutes of the planning board public hearing once I receive them Thanks again for your time Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax i Fuentes, Kim .12 MLO From: paul pawlowski <pawlowskibiz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 1:06 PM To: Fuentes, Kim; Cantrell, Elizabeth; Sakarellos, Elizabeth; Lanza, Heather, Cummings, Brian A.; don@briarclifflandscape.com; Charles Cuddy; Charles Cuddy;Joe Slovak Subject: Sports East Attachments: 2016_5_2 Public Meeting Minutes.pdf, 2016_5_2 Public Meeting Minutes.pdf Subject :Sports East D - JUN 01 2016 To Whom: ZBA Chairperson and Planning Board L_'_L L Hello Attached is the "draft minuted from the planning board public hearing dated May 2nd I am sending this to point out the facts There was 5 people that spoke against this project, There was 12 that spoke in favor the project, When I asked whom in the audience was for the project more then 90 percent of the room raised their hands in favor. For a project this size I would say that only 3 showed up at the ZBA hearing against and 5 at the planning board and more then 100 showed up combined in favor. With a project of this size I would say that is good odds for the support of this project not to mention the endorsements we received from various associations in our town The concerns that were brought up were as follows from Denise Giess, Joy Ellinghouse, Julie Amper ,, Jill Shroeder, , Joe Lechner - traffic concerns -environmental impact and septic system -what type of club is it - this might be taken off tax roll in non for profit - noise -tree clearing -child day care -safety -nature of business After these people spoke they were told by the planning board chairman that most of these concerns would be handled through the SEQRA review? so again I question why has this been stopped? 1 So these were the concerns that were brought up and these are different then what was written in the letter from the planning board to the ZBA? why are the concerns only written in that letter verse the many positive arguments made at that hearing? why aren't my responses to the questions in that letter? In all hearing and in this public hearing you can read that I clearly stated the following Iq -we have mitigated any seqra concerns , traffic issues, safety etc 6q - we are a private club and not public -the noise will not exceed the main road traffic -this will not be taking off the tax roll -this will be an annual membership club with both indoor and outdoor sports -there are no endangered species on the property -there is no daily, weekly or monthly memberships -there will be no sports teams or buses We have clearly stated and understand that this proposal falls clearly under the 280-13 B code for special exception, we have done our part,we have spent all the monies needed so the planning board can do SEQRA and we have no idea why this was haulted over a few concerns which are natural in a public hearing setting Answers are needed and should be given to us as we have done our part as the applicant and followed the rules and submitted the items needed . PLEASE KNOW THE CONCERNS MENTIONED IN THE LETTER TO ZBA ARE NOT FACTS AT ALL. Again I ask that we can all meet to discuss this matter . I have now sent both public hearing minutes were we the applicant define what were are applying for . Alos we dont even know what the next steps are now that this process has been stopped? Thank you Paul Pawlowski Paul Pawlowski 631-445-4348 cell 631-850-5452 fax 2 t The SEQRA review in connection with the Pawlowski application is going to be conducted by the Planning Board, as lead agency, via a coordinated review. Once the SEQRA review is completed by the Planning Board, the ZBA as a,n involved agency shall examine same and incorporate it into our deliberation on this application. Therefore, the application will necessarily be adjourned after today's hearing in order to receive SEQRA. n s e e - nd' •� s St ] ceives overwhelmin community support•at first public hearing- re !I { Mattituck athletic facility , g an indoor/outdoor sports facility on Main letic Sports,East is proposing to.build outdoor ath- BY JEN NUZZO buildi ' syn- ASSOCIATE EDITOR � - -Road. � -� - � sports, fields closer to Main Road, including a # "As someone /who grew up in Mattituck, thetic field for multiple as well as tennis ! I Parents and senior citizens say there's a dire there isn't a lot for,kids to_do," said Mattituck- and,pickleball courts. Lighting for the outdoor lack of recreational activities in Southold Town.', Cutchogue Elementary PTA president Lisa Fox. fields isn't included in the proposal. And at a Zoning Board of Appeals meeting last- "We see people in trouble all the time with drugs While hours of operation haven't been final- Thursday,dozens-of residents said Sports East— and alcohol; and hopefully this will be another ized, Mr. Pawlowski estimated the facility could l private sports facility in Mattituck— outlet for children to go,to be constructive and be open between 5:30 mir nd 10 armed for the a proposed p p tY healthy cafe for membersp is just what the town needs. healthy." I During a public hearing to discuss the pro- The developers have;said the facility would be facility,al said. p p posal, those in attendance overwhelmingly,said, similar to the Southampton Youth Services recre- Several athletic facilities are also proposed for they'd support Sports East LLC,partners Paul ation center,which is located more than 40-min- the building's interior, includingOR 5 synthetic yn PAGE 5 i Pawlowski, Steve Marsh and Joe Slovak's plan to _ute0rom_Mattituck.- ! -_ - SUFFO_LKTIMES.COM I FEBRUARY 11,-2016 I _25- -We're 25_-We're fully dedicated as three _ - I SPORTS EAST... -- - -Southold Town-families-to-do this CONTINUED'FROM.PAGE 1__ i I think that's a key ingredient be- p .b. ';:yI¢, cause all three families have noth- field for multiple sports, one swim- '` <.f 1 Y .yw 'x{li �y41'.�yMy.?, " m'',xr'.$`� 1 '�,�„�w� .� �.;,a.h 'in but respect for this community. min pool, one basketball court, g P "" T:;t � ..v-; Mr. Pawlowski is the same de- four tennis courts, two battingca ''1- l k M�� g �� a� f ='g`.' P i„ � 2v }, velo er who previously proposed es, a gym, space for yoga and spin ,..° 4 l� �° ��' � �� �°."`� ' ���,� a,mixed-use'development for the _ locker rooms. classes, and ; ;'.,. �,•� �=�.� ` � property and, before that, an of As for the configuration of the fa- ; `fordable rental-complex. He with- i 't Mr. Pawlowski.said fields for Y� w-n y, I , ;, . K.A 't:>u 4..` rzf;Az � drew both applications after`receiv- that produce more noise, ' ` ' sports p_ ryiw ;,', fi>. pt4� ,,„ ing pushback from the community. such as tennis and soccer, will be P11, '°' ' - Wya, �� .f:'A�-��.,.-.,,�>�'���.�.�';•�iA After last Thursday's meeting, located closer to,the road. y. many residents congratulated Mr. re- and after-care <. In addition, s , ' ° P Pawloski 'gathering to shake his rams for school-age children .. Pro gr` f;, hand. He said the feedback he's re- are planned. r s ceived so far for Sports East has When speaking, Ms.Fox and oth- . ' been the best"heever received on erg citedThe Suffolk Times' Jan. 28 ` cover story about the area's heroin ”` any of his development proposals. rY N`' '', ' "It's a testament'to the reality that i epidemic and said-they believe row;' ; : ,. ° tiz, z` this is needed," Mr.Pawlowski said, I a sports facility will-improve the ,aw h " roM . . M ' a' 2 ti:. «,° a f life and give North Fork's quality ort adding that he's very optimistic JEN NUZZO PHOTO the proposal will be approved and l young adults and children produc- - tive activities to do,especially in the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals chairperson Leslie Kanes Weisman during last, could'be built within eight months i winter. Thursday's Sports East public hearing.She said another hearing will be held after an env following the town review process. Ms.Fox told the ZBA she supports ronmental study of the project is completed. Sports East doesn't need to seek } fthe project because there aren't any a change of zone because the prop- I spaces for indoor sports nearby.She become a burden to them and[can] For example, he said, separate erty's existing residential zoning al- E_-said she currently drives her chil- stay healthy by having,water aero- memberships will be available for lows annual membership clubs with dren to indoor facilities in Selden bits and swimming available to me. tennis, swimming and soccer. In a special exception from the ZBA. and Bellport for sports practices. -"I just hope and pray it happens," addition, he said an "anonymous The ZBA decided to leave the 'Adrienne Weber, an 80-year-old -she added. scholarship fund" will be provided. public hearing open for public com- North Fork resident,-said it's not While most residents praised the annually to people who can't afford ment and is awaiting a study about, just children who would benefit. proposal, a few raised concerns a membership. . potential environmental impacts, She said traveling out of town for about traffic and membership fees. Mr.Pawlowski also said he's look-_ known as SEQRA. recreation as a senior is burden- Mr.Pawlowski said he'll work with ,ing into installing a state-of-the-art ZBA chairperson Leslie Kanes some. the state Department of Transpor- wastewater treatment system and Weisman said the ZBA will hold an- ".There's aneed here for the se- tation to mitigate traffic congestion salt-water pool. other public hearing to discuss.SE- niors," she said. "I moved back to and said Sports East will-offertiered "This partnership is created by QRA.findings. the North Fork to be closer to my memberships in order-to maintain the Pawlowski family, the Marsh j children. Hopefully I don't have-to affordable options. - family and Slovak family," he said. jnuzzoC)timesreview:com i_ DI% Q STRONGS \.W' M A R I N E 1 Kvi May 10,2016 (CZ'IV Z V MAY Southold Town ZBA PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Good Day ZBA Members, I am writing to your department to express my support for the Sports East LLC recreational complex proposed for Rt. 25 in Mattituck. Our Family has resided in Mattituck since 1965,we have attended the local schools, been very involved in many community volunteer groups,own 3 homes and two businesses in Mattituck.We believe we have a pretty good understanding of our local community's needs and desires. We believe the developers have gone to great lengths to provide very generous natural buffer plantings around the perimeter of the project being sensitive to neighbors. In addition,the facilities proposed will be of great community benefit for our people of all ages,year round. Lastly,we believe that this project will have significantly less environmental impact than if it were developed with the number of homes it is currently zoned for. For all of the reasons above we would ask you to grant their requested zone changes to allow this community centric project to move forward. Thank You for your consideration and your tireless efforts. Jeff Strong& Family President Strong's Marine Mattituck Bay 631.298.4770 1 Water Club, Mattituck Sound 631.298.4739 1 Southampton 631.283.6736 1 Port Washington 5i6.304.5376 strongsmarine.com COBALT PU©r r� 5u � !/ABSOLUTE �/V DECEIVED Julie Amper I p a 1645 Meadow Beach Lane ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Mattituck, NY 11952 (631)298-1823 May 10, 2016 IM .-Leshe .Manes vveisman, i"nairwuinai i --- — Gerard Goehringer, Eric Dantes,George Horning, Kenneth Schneider,Vicki Toth Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Chairwoman Weisman and members of the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals: I am writing to express my opposition to granting a special exception to permit construction and operation of Sports East, which seems to me to be a subterfuge to allow commercial use in a residential zone, following the developer's earlier failed attempt to accomplish this through a zone change. The project offers a single, much-ballyhooed carrot: a swimming pool for club members use. We already have adequate playing fields in town(which might, in truth, benefit from better, more coordinated scheduling). We have tennis facilities and courts designated for pickleball. The Ree Center and the libraries all offer a myriad of exercise options, including yoga, dance and Pilates. We have a sporting goods store just down the road, obviating the need for an on-site retail pro shop. And we have numerous health clubs/fitness centers that offer memberships to paying customers. This project is no different from those commercial, for-profit establishments except in terms of scale, and like those facilities, should be located in a commercial zone. How does this one carrot—a private membership swimming pool justify the stick—a dangerous, precedent-setting act that undermines and subverts the zoning map and threatens the integrity of past planning efforts. From the 2002 Blue Ribbon Commission, the 2005 Hamlet Study, and the 2008 Hamlet Stakeholders Initiative to as recently as last autumn when they rejected Mr. Pawlowsky's proposed zone change, Mattituck residents have clearly and repeatedly indicated that they want this property to remain residential. People are entitled to have confidence in our zoning code, to take for granted that if they move next door to a property zoned R80, they can expect a quiet residential area, not the thump-thump of tennis balls,the cacophony of playing fields, and the increased traffic from dawn to dusk generated from a commercial sports center. The Sports East project should serve as a timely warning. As the Planning Department works on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, soliciting input from residents about their vision for the Town, we need to know that that vision,those goals and objectives will be honored by our leaders, that the policies and land use designations of this Comprehensive Plan--both the letter and the spirit of the zoning code--will be upheld, not disregarded in order to accommodate future developers seeking a zone change or"special exception," that makes a mockery of the true vision behind the code. A swimming pool and sports center may indeed be a much-needed resource for Southold, but it should be located in a commercial zone. An even greater resource for our Town would be to preserve one of the few remaining hardwood forests in Mattituck for a much- needed groundwater recharge area. I would very much hope that this option be explored and the special exception be denied. Thank you for your attention. j q RECEIVED Sincerely, MAY 12 2o16 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Julie Amper RECEIVE6 S\ FEB 1,8 2016, - BOAR o�APPEALS. (CI My name is Mindy Ryan. I've lived and worked on the North Fork for over 30 years and I currently live in Greenport. In high school I got a C in public speaking so please bare with me as I read the statement I've'prepared. I was a lifeguard for the Town of Southold in 1984 and 85. 1 took my lifeguard classes at Southold Town Beach. I remember at the time thinking how odd it was that,we had to drive 60 miles to the pool at Montauk Downs to take.the water portion of the test. Was, this as- this really the closet pool around? As I got older] struggled to find ways to stay physically fit. During my pregnancy in 1996 " I was desperate for exercise and-felt fortunate to have a swim membership at 7 Z's in Flanders..-The indoor pool was very short in length but certainly better than nothing. I continued to search for an indoor pool as my daughter grew up, one winter traveling the 30 miles to the Hampton Inn at Brookhaven where we had a pool membership. My daughter eventually followed in my footsteps and took her lifeguard certification course. Those classes were 25 miles away at the Brookhaven National Lab. Over the years I've followed and supported proposals to build a YMCA with an indoor' pool in various locations including Greenport, Peconic, Laurel, Aquebogue,-Riverhead : and Calverton. So many proposals and all of them shot down for one reason or another. When the YMCA at Laurel Lake was being picked apart I stood up at a meeting very similar to this one and said "please, put the YMCA in my backyard"! I am very excited about the Sports East proposal and support this project 100V It has everything I've dreamed of in a sports facility and more. The thoughtfulness in planning goes above and beyond. I took off from work this morning to come here to show my support'and to personally thank Mr. Pawlowski for his continued and persistent effort to do something good for our community. I admired his desire to do good even before I heard about this 3`d proposal for his Matttituck-property. An indoor pool on the North Fork has been a dream of mine for 20 years. Mr. Pawlowski, Mr. Slovak, Mr. Marsh, thank you for your dedication to this project. 6A 1 Jo-Ann Lechner RECEIVED / X15 Marlene Lane Mattituck, NY 11592 FEB 12 2016 February 3, 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I Dear Zoning Board of Appeals: It has been brought to my attention that Sports East LLC Partner will be requesting approval to build an indoor/outdoor sports facility on a piece of property which fronts Main Street. I have many concerns regarding this project which appears to fall into the Special Exceptions to R80,(single family homes on 2 acres of property). This is a great endeavor that includes swimming,tennis,soccer fields,etc. The property is located next to single family homes. It appears that many of the services offered are currently available in the schools. There are many open fields that children can play organized baseball,soccer etc. Our schools are top notch and they offer many organized sports. I believe much of our Town's revenue comes from the tourist industry. This industry brings many people from other parts of Long Island and other States because our town offers what has been destroyed in other locations. We have a small town feeling:quant beaches,farms,wineries and a place just to relax and have fun with your children. The area that was once a one season event has now turned into three seasons. This is great for the Town coffers;people leave their money and use very few of the town's services. Besides the'enormous size of this project prbposed,by Sports East LLC Partners,there are also other considerations which,must be weighed. For example,this area of'Mattituck is a traffic disaster: More traffic will only lead to more congestion and more probability of car accidents. The Town of Southold has a water quality problem. There are already seepages of salt water into fresh water. There was a massive fish kill as well as turtles killed last spring due to no oxygen in the waters caused by pollution. If this project goes through there will be more pollution in our bay caused by additional seepage via cesspool. If our Town allows increased pollution in our bays,with additional cesspool pollution,our Town will eventually lose two industries,fishing and tourist.Once we lose these industries they will never return. No one wants to go fishing or swimming in waters that are polluted. Paving large parking lots will also lead to runoff water that will also pollute our water ways. There will be additional light and noise pollution. I have read that there are no plans,at this time,for outdoor lighting. I do not believe this to be true. In order to compete with the school programs there will have to be outside lighting. Further,sports facility will be available from 6:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. There will have to be artificial lighting in the parking field. This will also change the character of Mattituck. What happens if this large project goes bankrupt?` ,Will it be necessary-to offer additional services to stay profitable? How much additional pollution will'that bring? I received a letter from Caldwell Banker stating that they have two clients'interested in buying real estate and asking if I was interested in selling my property. I quote,"I am writing to you because I am currently working with two excellent qualified buyers who have shown great interest in the Mattituck area of Long Island. They have fallen in love with the rural North Fork Lifestyle, beautiful parks,the convenient access to the beaches and the award winning schools. The Mattituck,area has everything they had hoped for in a neighborhood,and so much more." These people are looking to purchase a home in Mattituck because of what this rural community has to offer, not the rest of Long Island. I have been in the town of Mattituck for approximately 20 years and have seen many changes. Please take into consideration the quality of life of all individuals who love their Town and have to live with all the environmental impact changes that a very large project brings. These include and are not limited to: water,air, light,traffic pollution,etc.This also affects the industries that provide much revenue to the Town of Southold and the municipalities. I ask that you take my concerns into consideration. Once this vast project is approved,there is not going back environmentally. Respectfully, Jo-Ann Lechner �"\�5'PECONIC IANDING RECEZVED FEB - 4 2016 ZONING SOARp OF January 19, 2016 APP�4�s ' Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY ,11971 Attn: Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Re: Proposed Sports Center in Mattituck Dear Ms. Weisman: Tlils letter itten is wrin su�porf bf the proposed sports facility in Mattituck, New York'. ; I have been'involved in youth sports for years, coaching and on boards of these or'gani`zations. I have three children of my own all very active in sports. As a necessity we travel west because of a lack of sports facilities and trainers on the East End, I would see this sports facility as an asset for the North Fork athletes. It has been my pleasure to be the President of the Grid Iron Parents (Porters Football) for several years and wish we had a facility like this for off season training. I believe youth sports is something that could be improved significantly on the North Fork if there were a facility for coadl yes and trainers to work.with our children. Respectfully, ; Robert J,. Syron PiOs"ident G'ridir'on I'erents" President and CEO Peb6 is Land'ing,'at Southold Iric: C • d' 1 k , 1500 Brecknock Road Greenport, New York 11944 Toll Free (888) 273-2664 • (631) 477-3800 *•Fax (631) 477-3900 ba•. t r � .„S`. a; . � �., ,ro... II IIIA..... �•, `��' v= IflH IIIi� I�• IIR IINI III } Sakarellos, Elizabeth From: Toth,Vicki Sent: Thursday, February04, 2016 7:26 AM To: Cappabianca, Lucille; Sakarellos, ElizabethECEIVED Subject: FW: NY. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Sports Complex Variance ®4 Please add to file,give copy to all members. Maybe this can make it to the hearing? 7014I14G 60ARD OF APPEALS Thanks,Vicki From:Joseph Pufahl Upufahl@adchem.com] Sent:Wednesday, February 03, 2016 4:39 PIM To:Toth,Vicki Subject: NY.SCTM#1000-122-7-9 Sports Complex Variance Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals NY. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 In the matter of the above referenced variance I wish to submit my letter reproduced below to the editor of the Suffolk Times in support of the project. Readers weigh in on proposed sports complex in Mattituck by The Suffolk Times<http://suffolktimes.timesrbview.com/author/suffolktimes/> 12/19/201510:00 CUTCHOGUE Even in this age of hyper-sensitivity and partisanship on virtually every social and political issue, I believe one thing everyone on the North Fork would'agree is the importance of exercise facilities to the overall health and well-being of our residents. While the use of critical land, estuaries and waterfront demand close scrutiny,we need to keep perspective on the balance of commercial land use as primarily an aesthetics issue.We need to prioritize such use as to what is best for the whole community.We have to face the reality that our society faces a crisis in diabetes and both adult and childhood obesity burdening our health care facilities while increasing the cost of health care,geometrically.This fact is reinforced by recent Community Health Assessments available from all regional hospitals. Central to fighting these diseases are exercise and healthy living alternatives.The proposed facilities centered on the North Fork would provide a year-round location for children and adults to find alternatives to smartphones,video games,TV, overeating and, as we have recently learned,the scourge of heroin and other all to readily available street and prescription drugs. I will admit to one selfish interest in being able to swim a couple of times a week closer than the 40-minute commute to Brookhaven Aquatic Center in Mastic Beach.The Town Board should perform its due diligence on the site plan and review this use. If there is objection and a deciding vote needs to be cast balancing all things, I would suggest that erring on the side of the health and well-being of our residents comes first. 1 Joseph M Pufahl Triathlete Member of the ELIH Board of Trustees Former Member of Greenport Zoning Board of Appeals Former Greenport Village Trustee Former Member of Riverhead Rotary Club Former Member and Past President of the Mattituck Lions Club Principal and Co-Founder of the Mattituck Fund for Students 980 Depot Lane Cutchogue, NY This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the recipient to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by email or by telephone at(631)727-6000 of any unintended recipients, delete the original message and destroy any copies that may be in your possession. o t LI '�JECETVev FEB Q4Z015 BOARD OF APPEALS 2 Toth, Vicki From: Chetrux <chetrux@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday,January 26, 2016 10:52 AM To: Toth,Vicki Subject: Fwd: Sports Complex - Mattituck Sent from AOL Mobile Mail D -----Original Message----- JANA From: Chetrux<chetruxna,aol.com> To: vicki.toth <vicki.toth@town.southold.us> Sent: Tue, Jan 26, 2016 10:40 AM Subject: Sports Complex-Mattituck As a homeowner at 620 Sigsbee Road in Mattituck and a person familiar with projects Mr. Pawlowski has developed in the past, I would like to express my approval to the plans he has put forward to develop the property at 9300 Main Road, Mattituck,NY. Sincerely, James Hines Sent from AOL Mobile Mail i BOARD MEMBERS ®f S®Ur�® South-old Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson � 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179® - - ® Southold,NY 11971=0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning `a® 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider Com , Southold,-NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 201'6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Town Code Chapter 280 (Zoning), Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971-0969, on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2016: 9:15 A.M. - 9300 ROUTE 25, INC. (PAWLOWSKI) #6914 - Request for Special Exception per Article III Code Section 280-13B(7), the applicant is requesting permission to construct an annual membership club, located at: 9300 Main Road (aka NYS Route 25) Mattituck, NY. SCTM#1000-122-7-9 The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: Vicki.TothO-Town.Southold.ny.us Dated: January 11, 2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS LESLIE KANES WEISMAN, CHAIRPERSON By: Vicki Toth 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing/USPS) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 151 1 AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of MAILINGS �✓ `�� �,/ RECEIVED (Name of Applicants) JAN 2016 SCTM Parcel# 1000- 7 � c I Z®iVING BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK residing at New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says that: On the day of ///-r /� , 2%I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN-RECEIPT-REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in. Prepaid envelopes addressed to current property owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( )Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. ` (Signature) Sworn to before me this 1 S day of 20 1( VICKI TOTH Notary Public State of New York No.ON6190696 ! Qualified in Suffolk County t f Cornmission Expires July'28,?U/k) (Notary Public) PLEASE list on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. Postal - mi CERTIFIED, , © ■ Ir Ir Dom6stic,Mail Only Ie MATT)TUCK y7nY,911'952: ,,• MAT I TUGY r Y�1 ' u 6 E3 ,a Certified Mall Fee .0 Certified Mad Fee :o $3.45 _ �� 0 r2 ® ,� o $ $3.45 �°°�, gcOb 1 tr) $ ,.. 906 s' Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee te) .d� Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee app to' •/N� - ry - ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ppIr�J,�I•lr�•A.1y0 _`vM 4/p'/y�/�/47/►(/,� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ \ O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $s.- (Q � ,t Ppgj� ���7p.� � � ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ ;, -//A p, PD'""'-"'K p7�J O ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ i `vv _-_ 4 A Posere� a7M1-J•T []Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ -•:`- 4'V i V �� 4 ^ C3 ❑Adult Signature Required 1; �(J 16 9 Adult Signature Required $ \v(� ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ..n /\ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage - I n.) O Postage b $ $0.71 01/15/2016 6' -� aotalPos Irl c7��1 \ 01/15/2t�16�'�� C3 Total Posta- $6.96 ��se �,�% 1 o $ AML HIIV ES 117 sentTo MEGA STYLE LLC �`6G'8Z1-�� r1-� Sent NO 620 SIGSBEE ROAD O Sfieefand-) PO BOX 56 ----- C3 '8 6efant MATTITUCK NY 11952 )` MATTITUCK NY 11952 City State,• --- Cdy,Stah ° • Ln ■ I• • '..0 _nngl 'Nra C3 NEE= r` • 1, � p ° AQUEBOGUE Y�TY IVMI j M SOU HOL 5 !RY 11 1 ; I �"��, 7 C3 s r u t I u ® p Certified Mad Fee O Certifed Mad Fee 09. $3.4e e $3.45 3 $ � ik 17 v i^ $ _t . LnExtra Services&Fees check box,add lea r ((��p - ` Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee a(�pr e) _ JAN P, ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ • _ - °e A yC ❑Return Receipt(hanicopy) $ `• _ 2016 [� tl 1 ostmark'' a N ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ $f--l0 __ Postmark � ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ J rpt Q �.� n, = 2(,J�L(�re �•J a E]Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ tC -rEl Q ❑Carted Mail Restricted Delivery $ t" ❑Adult Signature Required $ []Adult Signature Required $ Y•� � • A []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ c.® p Postage O Postage $x!.71 c P�� $ s $ \ 01A5/20161 -0 Total Po W. �7 tt1�1,201b� Total Postage �. O ,5 �6. $ D( EN SIDOR �®�6z8j. 117 sentTo ALFRt*h' ILETTI Ir► Sent To 645 MILL CREEK DR a PO BOX 1040 r•q O Sfieef and C SfieefandAPt SOUTHOLD NY 11971 r. AQUEBOGUE NY 11931 City State,ZIF City State, :11 1 • S&ViCOT ° • ® , AIL© ■ ■ ■ ® A © ■ ■ C3I. 1• • ru E:l . . • . M L�OYNTOi $E+'1GN�s L 334/.[J•/'o9 '3``s'ii*°' .♦' - r' �r - ° ���7,V O w''-"ll `el L: �, a✓ L�'-= 3:Q�ti 0 •-7 t It t 3 �y _p Certified Mad Fee $ -1 4� aa� - [IgSQ Certified Mad Fee $� 4 r y° �2�� Q 3. $ $ X06 Ln Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee Cjt►itll F i i 11) 3 R Extra Services&Fees checkbox,add fee r' fie) ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ �4 I ( .t� - lull - r. ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ ❑Return Receipt(electronle) $ JAN '��astrnark (1a [�- - ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $[]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ - Here C 0 []Certified Mad Restnded Delivery $ {�� ✓Neta � ❑Adult Signature Required $ � 0 ❑ @����'� \`' k, - (J7 tt�' Adult Signature Required $�!j J ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ "!" ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage '�GF p Postage $0.71 $ 01/15/,,2- = $ ��; iii/i5/2016�� Total �����G��?A O $696 Total Poste $ MOREN�rftST ! $ ELIZE.96 CITTI Lnsent' 2301 ASPEN WAY Ln Sent To rq ----------- ra 1480 SIGSBEE RD ------ 0 Sfiee, BOYNTON BEACH FL 33436 O Sfieefsndr r` MATTITUCK NY 11952 City,� Ciry Stafe,• 11 1 1 1 111 - - :11 1 •1 © ■ ■ ■ ® D ■ ■ ■ fit') M /e • M /• • m nj LI T(TGE j't�EC�K-r Puff((!1363 f��� �L1 � � o FREE'PORTa VY 11521 • ' .®�� ._� `" ,-l7 Certified Mad Fee Certified Mad Fee $3.45 �o- 095Zg'� $3.45 C(�; $ � 06 � Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee a roe ate) �• Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee as te) tt®t� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I`� (� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ - "4 c— 1tz ❑ Return Receipt(electronic) $ � P�ttnark N 0 El Return Receipt(electronic) $ ®ll C�PDs rk ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ � ��,Ce're (9 C3 E]Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ I m N H ❑Adult Signature Required $ Ct7 ❑Adult Signature Required $ _ - N []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ `� - I ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ .. c; O Postage O Postage $0.71 ���� r I $ $0.71 -D Total Post 01'/1.1/2f�tt o Total Poste q $6.96 4 r �` O sentTo FELIZ MULE Ln sentTo AB X14 GARCIA a 21 WILSON PL rq O Sfieefand 15 LITTLE NECK RD A Stieetandr FREEPORT NY 11520 DOUGLASTON NY 11363 ----------- Crty,State, City,State, '----- :IB 1 11 •1 — — - i o ° s ® e rl ®® • E3 cD HAM1'T BAY' 1•,1 fill, l t a�`L , ,�< - r i , n E3 �.a) t, u i�952� I 11ATTIIU K.IIY 1 Z ;'.. ��6 �8 9. f p Certfied Mad Fee +3 45 I v r� ( p $ CD 00 1] Certified Mad Fee $3.45 t9� 17 Lt7 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee sg Flue) t^`4 w i i p $ -y� ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) l Po rk I ', Extra services&Fees(check box,add/e pr re) r(1 l`- ❑Return Receipt electronic $ _ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ T �a7fj C-3 p(electronic) `' Ga ❑ C n isostmark B� Q ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ C,7i -Y ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ �p ❑Adult Signature Required $ '„ sL. I O ❑Certified Mail Restncted Delivery $ _ �q' Here- fA1 Q " d ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ / [:3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ �� []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ '� Q Postage $0.71 �- $ ��� r 01✓1`I2[ti](i�d p Postage i Total Postage a �i Q 9g ®� [��� Total Postage $ �/TONY INC p g� ` Ln Sent To r cTRF.F.T mbn $ 90—Z5MAIN ROAD `,C„ �•Z� Pte, ra 1 WEST A4AI�. tt�, T� U1 Sent 10095 MAIN RD p Siiei&fandAIC-, HAMPTON BAYS NY 11946 C S I p Stie&l and Apt MATTITUCK NY 11952 LAS S Ciry Stat&,ZIPa � _ oil JITI City Stat&,Zlf :oe r ee eee•e - - - _ - er a ■e eee•e `L w'.. ; ° e ® e . . ■ Ln ®, • C3 fU A f „ ANY 11743 I 1 _ D HLl�lTI1�GTO�t' "1 t 8,a � i p ,' Vii■ 3 3w_ p apt` x,0952. p Certified Mall Fee $3.45 �r ._ 2 ' .D Certfied Mad Fee` $3.45 �1�1iC1�! lO $ O to _-. - _-. V16 0 6 ' � Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee�s ppp ajr Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,ed f � ) --_,- g ?V ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) �t ❑Return Receipt(hardcopY) ��� (�-1�� t,\'t p'�,//mar �r��•,.,,•1,.' []Return Receipt(electronic) 1$U•Ll `Postmark�1 0 ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ � Hefe P" E:3 r _ [� Certified Matl Restricted Delivery $ ❑Certs Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ttii $il til 'dC Hefe ®A p ❑ sJ� N 0 []Adult Signature Required _ r p []Adult Signature Required $ ,, (����t(y �d Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery �tl���y,i. �r ® Q ❑ C3 Postage 11.71 r,G� nJ 4� Postage [)■71 ��' �- +J 01/1512 Total Postagi Total Postage al gg��� ® 4i p �� p $ J(3HNETZK ��/g ���@.����� $ KE �FMS � �' L Ln Sent To 1120 SIGBEE RD �0► c4,51 T Sent To 30 EASTGATE DR r-qC3 Stie&[andApf' MATTITUCK NY 11952 �r�V�5P5 Q 3treetandAp HUNTINGTON NY 11743 City Stat&,ZIP+ Crty,State,ZI ,, r e e eee•a U.S _ - ° ® ° ■ , VAIV RECEIPT�. coCE I 0 • i r-1 I• estir Mail • '� ,� rq •• . , IELl�II fi•NtDf21Sv01 jE . }' , (b1 �` i1ATTI1U �4r NY 11952' qt��,®{(}7 a _ Certified Mail Fee e $3.45 d ' r=19�!_'• �° J] Certified Mall Fee 119 2 a\i Q $ �ctl'6 p $ $3.45Lr) n O6 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee �p r ate)\ Ln U �1 I/ V '� Extra Sen Receipt &Fees(check box,add/ee te)-:' il]A8 CC ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ aCJ �Jg[/��� � �6'� NC Return Receipt(electronic) $ Tin POStmarK ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ -• �q/)! „� E3 Certified Mail Restrict( Delivery $ �- ��}g E]Return Receipt(electronic) $ \• 4ioS'l'i}t/af� � Q /' / y�` [I Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ f*, 4B 6 []Adult Signature Required $ 4 ty Q' Q a Q ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ Q'= 3- /�,� p E]Adult Signature Required $ -- [-]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$�— - g� -t•;+rd M $ostage $0.71 �) Q Postage $0.71 �I Q � Cu _n ��01/15/201 b $ 6'�01,/15/2Q1 , Q Total Postac SAb9I TRUST ������� p Total Posta $ ELIB 'H CASSIDY i Ln Sent To 519 DALLAM CTto Sent To 1560 SIGSBEE ROAD C3 StieetanifAi gEL AIR MD 21014 Q Sfie&rand, MATTITUCK NY 11952 City,Siete, City,Sta[e, :ee a ee _-- - o e a e e eee ° • ° 0 ■ ® e I , Ln I. • i � I o • Q' Q C3 .- „ . i1AT�PI LIGE•s' idY 11.952: � GREE PORT,c Y�11-944 . �" � 7'y E f l l l=a1 ' p ltl C i1 LSL 1 1 �� Q _U Certified Mall Fee 45 4� e 1-052, .D Certified Mad Fee 3.45 ,�® `LK52 p $ �3■ ` 2x� (16 0� o ?� Lrl Lr) $ � Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add lee ppD to) Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee �° te) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ lir /,( ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ y'- (ti l�• 1 v'Y n' !ti Ili �/�.. ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ _ 4, POs A4�,•[�a � ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ // l'fjy� p ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ �(��re 6 '"• C3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ v Vif3,i Here��� ® p Q V ee! N p ❑Adult Signature Required Q ❑Adult Signature Required $ y 'r ° ry []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ t �I E]Adult Signature Restricted Delivery C-3 Postage L;jp� Q Postage $0.71 $ $0.71 01/ EMM 6,u1 o Total Postage 0�,8� 01/15) �f� Total Postag( Q $6.96 fit, $ 9 to sentTo 9255 MAIN RD LLC r=116 Lr) SentToM$I�IIAL HUGHES _hee_t annd Ap______ PO BOX 645 p Sr=1605 BAYSHORE RD _ Sties&t andApf GREENPORT NY 11944 Q l`- MATTITUCK NY 11952 --- --------------- City,State,ZIP City,State,ZI .r :o e a e e eee•e - Postal CERTIFIED MAIL© s ECED, F Domestic Mail Only \ 0 ASTk1 ' NLI—'Ill e_``�� ! �® a $3.4 e C ,,.p Certified Mad Fee a p .J] Certified Mail Fee $3.4� ® < 0952 �tg O $ L \ ` '0952 �� J(� � $ p�' L ori W LJ1Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,addfee t tP 06 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee ate) �� � 92 � t7 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ • �' El Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ - .�' l0 Y'�+ O ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ OC'�Pos rk 0 ❑ Return Receipt(electronic) $ `. �OStm I 0 Return Mall Restricted Delivery $ I t Here ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ - r _ i�� s re ❑Adult Signature Required $'7+4" J �$- 1' , 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ • n `� n n. ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ A) []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ \'n r 1 •V E3 Postage $0.71 `s,, \ \ �Ctf Postage $0.71. ZP —0 $ �� !��! �? � Total Postage a �9 TotalPostagei $6.96 � �®� °( $ $6.96 $ ANNA SOURAVLIS �1 sent To HOPE HERGRUETER Ln Sent To PO BOX 642 rq 21-36 38TH STREET o SlreeianaApf ASTORIA NY 11105 MATTITUCK NY 11952 l7 SireeiandApr �` � Ctty State,ZlP-i City State,Z!P �S` :Ir 1 111.1 ���'si� - � � V -_`-'•`_ Ie ler•e �.".r�- - � 1 rU —a r`- ru , W(T� IJLF.Krg� ,.Y 1 9;552; fit ' 323€ ° - MATTITUCK {`JAY 1195'?{ '�4y Q Certified Mad Fee $3 4� ` 7 '=,'mss O �� 0 0952�� Certified Mad Fee $3.4` ��b 0952 `r) $ O6 CR6 Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,addfee ppgrp' W Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add fee p� ate) !2 V ❑ Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ {tf I ♦ 0 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ �F�O 0 ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ (� I �� P 0, r` E]Return Receipt(electronic) $ } P gtRmtark W 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here ❑Certrfied Mail Restricted Delivery $ r, ! HEr''� 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ a �� - I O ❑Adult Signature Required $ i :Aj�� , �\ []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ - .-`1 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ � A ` O Postage $17.71 /r ,F7 O Postage . ` 4Y $ " r`� Co $0.71 � Co- Total Post gg z 0 1 Jl10 �� Total Postage ��� $ MARVAR#T TONER ��d@OL G$�'✓ $ M �1l Z JACHIMOWICS �d Ln Sent To PO BOX 362 tr7 sent To 9395 ROUTE 25 M1 Sireeiana MATTITUCK NY 11952 CI Street and Apt MATTITUCI{NY 11952 ---------- City,State --------------- ------- tate,City,State,Z!F '-- LO r Ln ni N T T �, - 5�1 ���`.�� o • � U `'t. � fat hIAT(T�TUCKt t�Y 13'9521 II d Certified Mad Fee l 1 �� O $ $3.45 01W Certified Mail Fee $7 4 er 0952 o Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,arid!e;-gc,gppy�ytate) .y,_1 - Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee �6� \ ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ e�lr•tt Lr 47� -\ �� �/L� ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ 67� ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ C 1 F'OStmilkl , rte' r s t7� E] Q� ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ 1 11 OVostmark 0 []Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Ar/ Here\ O ❑�rtif ed Mail Restricted Delivery $ 1} �9 re Adult Signature Required $ rVf� nIN 0 ❑ g q a �� \ (4 0 []Adult Signature Required $ • ✓f/9/�� �i ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ E3 Postage fi° $ �C/ O Postage \B° p `(l��jY�•• �i �� 7 °v I $0.71 v a� O $ ���/ 01!1 Lt®W Total Postage a ``�� c Total Postage $$ qq��� 1!1 Ltl211� $ CAPT EDS MARI E-SALES" ' I$I�A�IAARET NOONE IN CI.�a��� � sent To PO BOX 528 r-q $ ent To 210 SIGSBEE RD E3 StreetandApt MATTITUCK NY 11952 c3Street andApf P MATTITUCK NY 11952 -------------- -- Ctty,State,Zlf Cdy,State,ZIP+ o a.r •a« -- - �Y-e�rtarr - :ar`ft�Ilk�t�'t WA ru C3 ? it P >i \ i ;' 'p i LAUREL r7, DIY((=11L14E.: _D Certified Mad Fee $3.45 s L7 o $ Ali -=-= 09�� I o Certified Mad Fee $3.45 �,� , tt95.Ln s S Extra Services&Fees(checkDox,addfe }(Pp to) _ $ Y �1 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ e y�� - �( Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,ad of to) fpp(PAd�+ " 0 El Return Receipt(electronle) $ 11 - E]Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ I 7 HP stmari�_ 1 I Post rk co 0 ❑Certrfied Mail Restricted Delivery $ 4 07 N V ❑Return Receipt(electrunic) $ 0 ❑Adult Signature Required $ t' Ci HSa�rYet = O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ,0-- pr ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ C ]Ra Q36'1 r8��I lqr hftl []Adult Signature Required $ • F{— n�o� O Postage lltVi!l6Jl Lru.+�x.� ®� 0 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ g $11.71_n s ` 0 Postage $0.71 0 Total Postag �'� 4/15l��,ii: � $ � V �i n -n16����1 $6.96 8g° � "n Total Postage q�, Ln $ ent To MARY BERNINGER ���L�� D �ILKTIMPONE E3 -_ 910 SIGSBEE RD I l.t'1 $ent To p0 BOX 155 E3 Street and AF .___ MATTITUCK NY 11952 C3 Streeiani-AWI LAUREL NY 11948 C ry State,ZI r`' City,State,ZII M. -- 7 �p,�� VA go 0 0 's�r,,.,,,,-p.�,451 MMMM .11 a. o Ute' ao r=1 ' o f tl l t _ I . C:3 ti I u .0 Certified Mad Fee 4� �� i 8 , Certified Mail Fee .�c �Z �C�52 O $3.45 Ln EMra Services&Fees(checkbox addfeee p atel' ! In Extra Services&Fees(checkbox,add tee ,ip r te)- _ ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ t �� El Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ 1 = Postmark r�- `k ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ - ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $1:3 ___ o _ 00 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ O ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ _ 131 OZ Ap (Sj []Adult Signature Required $ - \°�V `" -`i` ® O []Adult signature Required $ ❑Adult signature Restricted Delivery$ _ 4v �(�(`��\\'�y []Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postagepostage J d P $0.71- � 'I,��O�U1/l�f 2016 �, � $ $0.71 C3 Total Postage I �n � ,� •� Total Postage �5,� 01/1,. 01 $ A*96NYANTO la �� o $ JA E%6FAHENY S�L19���'U Ln Sent To 3175 ROUTE 48 �''LL 9� Ln sent To 1548 212TH STREET siieeiandApE MATTITUCK NY 11952 CC` Siie5iandApE BAYSIDE NY 11360 City,State,ZIP �.,..�s�..,.., Ciry State:ZIF kTESEl °� :o o •. �QGZ�1 ,, „,•, t3xal; �u1C7.tAlafwm _ o „ :a o :. v . ,o ,,,•, -' ;: '{� i • • I C C' THIS SECTI ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X J /]/ f [3, ddressee gen so that we can return the card to you. I/l/ � p B./e eived y in e) C. Date�� 4 ■ Attach this card to the back of the mail iece, �� or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is deliaddress different from Item ? ❑Yes 1 \4! If YES,enter delivery address below ❑No MARY BERNINGER 910 SIGSBEE RD MATTITUCK NY 11952 Ii I Illlll IIII III I I I I I II I III III I I II Ili I I I I II iII Service Priority Mail Pri Signature ❑Adult Restricted Delivery ❑Registered MRestricted 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 04 ❑Certified Mall® Delivery ElCertified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Merchandiseipt for ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) 13 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery d ElSignature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0007 5060 713 2 11 Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,April-2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt COMPLETE THIS SECTIONrONIDELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Slgnatur � 13 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse x 1 ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. ecei ed C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,or on the front if space permits. 11- Article Addressed te: D. Is ad ss different m ita 1? ❑Yes if ,enterveery beloldu& ❑No ANTHONY ANTONGEORGI 3175 ROUTE 48 �N O MATTITUCK-NY 11952 , �ell „ riorty Mail Expre ss Service � R[3 Adult Signature � li51 � egistered Mail"mIIlIlllll IN lit1IIll11lIllII111II1111IIIIlIII El Adult Signature Restri�tedde ❑Re stated Mad Restricted 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 35 ❑Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Merchandiseiptfor ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number(Fransfer_from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0007 5060 716 3 I Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,April;2015 PSN.7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt . . o o Signature ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. 11—94-H,- Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse �( �!' �� L''-r te �t` �. �.,re so that we can return the card to you. /� ddressee B. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Received by(Printed Naie0 )- C. Dae of'Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address differen66rp i ? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address�below: ❑ ;! MICHAEL HUGHES 605 BAYSHORE RD GREENPORT NY 11944 II I Illlll Illi III I l I I l Il I III III I I II Ii I III IiI iII 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailTm ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 50 ❑Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return for 1:1 Collect on Delivery Modie El Signature ConfirmationTm El Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery o ArHrie nl„mhcr?ransfr r from service label) Mail 11Signature Confirmation 7 015 0640 0 0 0 7. 5 0 6 0 7088 )o,il Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS,Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt . •z= • • • ® Complete items 1,2,anD W. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X C3 Agent so that we can return the card to you. . ❑Addressee j ® Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Ur ec ive by(Printed ate of Delivery 1 or on the front if space permits. I. Article Addressed to:___ _ _ D. Is delivery address di Brent from item 1? ❑Yes --— l If YES,en I below: [3 No MARIUSZ JACHIMOWICS s 9395 ROUTE 25 o>`Z® �I ti~ f � MATTITUCK NY 11952 II 1111111111 III I l l l I Ill11111 l f 1111111 II III�II 1103 Adu 1 dui nature Restricted Delivery ❑R'.et re eered red Mail Tm Restrlctecl� 9590 9403 0380 5163 6180 31 ❑Certifl IO ro very { ❑Certifie stricted Delivery alum Receipt for ` ❑Collect on �� erchandise ! 2._Article:Ntimbe�(Transfer from;service.labe ; ;: : ❑Collect on De ❑signature Confirmation*"^ + i v n: ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015' 0 6 4 0 ' 0 0 0 7' 5'0 6'0 7 2 6 2`' '' id Restricted Delivery<E j i l l Restricted Delivery PSzForm 38j1j1,,jApr1120i1.5,PSN 7i53' 02-000-9053`• }; p Domestic Return Recei t t {iiili , • • • • •NDELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature �� ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X g Agent so that we can return the card to you. Addressee s Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, Rec ived b (Pr'nted Name) C. Dat of Delive or on the front if space permits. �/� �t/ 2 I.-Article Addressed to: ""D. Is delivery address different from item 1? LU Yesf C r! If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No ELIZEBETH CASSIDY - 1560 SIGSBEE ROAD MATTITUCK NY 11952 III 111111 IIII III I I I I i II I III II I I I II II I I lllll III 3. Service Type 13Priority Mail Express® 13 I ❑Adult Signature IJ Registered Mailr^s ! ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mad Restricted? 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 74 11Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise i 2._Article.Number_(Transfer_from:serviceJahnn.,,_.- T Q Collect on DeliveryRestricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm '+ Mail ❑Signature Confirmation 70151 i 0 6,141f,10007 5 0 6 0 17101 i i^ ;^r M ll Restrloted Delivery 1 4 i I'Restricted Delivery i �,q�VLETE THIS SEPTION ON DEUVERY • A. Signature L%� i fill Complete items 1,2,and 3. �Ii ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reve ?� E3 Addressee I so that we can return the card to you. �,�� B. Rbc y(printed Name) C.Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the �fpnlece, or on the front if space permits.ermits. i to:___——-----"` --- + . Is delivery ress different from item 1? C3 Yes 1._Article Addressed YES,entO elivery address below: [3 No ELIZEBETH CITTI Sigi !- 1480 SIGSBEE RD MATTITUCK NY 11952 ,e I tiv Illll IIII Illll II 1111111111 II IIIIIIIIIi 1111 Priority ❑AdultSignaturee ❑Registered Mall ss� ed Mail 1111 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Mali Restricted, ❑Certified Mall(D Delivery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6177 99 [3 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise o collect an Delivery ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfmnationTM' -_2._Article_Number_(Transferfrom_service-labeA— —--- —Mail [3RSignature stricted Delivery 7015 0640 0007 5060 7026- Mad Restricted Delivery { ,P;S Formi3811;April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053, , ? : ; Domestic Return Receipt • • • • • i ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. –A181 nat ,! ■ Print your name and address on the reverse XV ❑Agent I so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Rec ived (Printed Name) C.Date of Delivery 1 or on the front if space permits. I I_AmrlP AddrP�sPd m _ D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes j If YES,enter deliveryz r@ss below. ❑No JAMES TAHENY ii 1548 212TH STREET BAYSIDE NY 11360 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® !!! II I Illill IIII iII i 1 I I I 1111111111111 IN111 II III ❑Adult Signature 13 Registered MailTM I yiy i 13 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restdctedf 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 66 ❑Certified Mail® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise I 2__ArticleNumber_Mransfer from service lab e 11 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation^" — Mail ; ❑Signature Confirmation 7015-°�6 4 D D 0 0 7 5 D 6'0 719 4^ i D'til Restricted Dehvery i; Restricted Delivery +I �'PSiFdrm 3811,; prilt!'•2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 i Domestic Return Receipt li i?A! I W11 • • •AI ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signz4ure ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X gent so that we can return the card to you. e ❑Addressee B. R6&4ed by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery { i ■ Attach this card to tie`'back of the mailpiece, 1I I3 or on the front if space permits. 1_-Article addressed to:_" ____ D. Is delivery ad res differe t from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 1 r DEBRA TIMPONE L� PO BOX 155 LAUREL NY 11948 111111111111 llJl 111 I�I I 111111111111111111111111111-1111 3.❑Adult Signaturre ❑RegisterMail ed t a llT11 ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restricted 9590-9403'0380 5163 6179 28 ❑Certified Mad® Delivery ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Q Return Receipt for ❑Collect an Delivery Merchandise 2.-Article NumbeL(Transfer from service label)-L - r ❑Collect cmDelivery Restricted Delivery; ❑Signature ConfirmationTm i - I; ;;I , 1 ; I I t + ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015-0 6`4 0 `0 0 0 7 5 0 6 0 71'5 6- Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery i PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt PS ,: I :, . ; : ;. i s, p I • • • • • • QEEIVERV { ■ Complete items 1,2,A�and 3. A.—Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X �� C3 13 so that We can return the card to you. ( ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery 1 or on the front if space permits. I ' )._Article Addressed to- D. Is delivery address differed itema Yes 1 T Y if YES,enter delivery ess belo�y DOREEN SIDOR- -j 645 MILL CREEK':DR x .1,- ' t -� SOUTHOLD NY 1,]'597:1 �° i,j, ce Jl I1lf11l Jill 111 l l l I I'll I 11111111l l111111 llllhlll o Adult Signature delrvi tupre Restricted Delive ❑RPriority egistered a ltm I 9 �' ❑Registered Mad Restricted 9590 9403 0380 5163 6176 2 ❑Certified Mail® Delivery I` ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 1_2. Article Number_(Transfer from s8rvlce label). ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm ❑Signature Confirmation 7018: d` 4*0 •.0 0 0 7 5 0 6'o 0`5 7+i 's+ s oil Restricted Delivery t (s Restricted Delivery i - I o oN• j ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent so that we can return the card to you. X ` ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. eceived b �y rinte ameC.Date of Del ) El ddels ee i ry or on the front if space permits. f f �u t t 1_Article Addressed t_o: I I( D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No I IHOPE HERGRUETER PO BOX 642 MATTITUCK NY 11952 i lllllllll illi Hill lllJl�lll 111���III III 13 Service Type ❑Priority Mail Exprss@ l ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailTM El Adult 1 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 73 ❑Certified Mailp nature Restricted Delivery ❑D 9veered Mail Restricted; ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for 2. Article Number(Transfer from service ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 1 /abe/) _❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm ; 7015 0640 0007 5060 7200_ I Delivery ❑Restricted Delignature verytion Restifcted Delive PS Form 3811,Apr+i1+201+ ++,5 PSN+ r 7530-02-000-9053: ` '' ' + ' : Domestic Return Receipt -l i- I 1 e • • • ® . ! i t t t ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. IN E Print your name and address on the reverse 13 k4- so that We can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, (' JAN a C. Date of Delivery + I or on the front if space permits. 201w) I! i—AMA.°ani"—d t^' O D. Is deli a address dlffere m item 1? ❑Yes If YEW,� r delivery ad below: ❑No MARGARET TONER PO BOX 362 \� �.'Q� �d MATTITUCK NY 11952 FZLr 111111111 Jill 111111111111111111111111111111111 :r3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® '❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MailTM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mad Restricted] 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 80 ; ❑Certified Maito Delivery +' 1:1 Cart ifled Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTm Mail, 13Signature Confirmation 1 7015' 0640`0007 '5060 7 217 + 50 ail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery i � PS Form 381.1 ;„April;201''5 PSN 7530-02-600-6053 1 i Domestic Return Receipt II • ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A si ature I ❑Agent I ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ece'ved by a e C.Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, V 5 y or on the front if space permits. I I I 1. Article Addressed to: y____ D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes — If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No ALFRED CILETTI �4J� PO BOX 1040 s ' .i AQUEBOGUE NY 11931 ,` JAN 19 2016 . . [— Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® Il�il�llllllll'Il�lllll�ll�lll1111lllllllll�listri Adult Signature egstere ❑ istered Mail Restricted Y uit Signature Recte Delivery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 36 ❑Certified ed Delivery E3Retum Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery.p Signature Confirmation*'" 2. Article Number(Transfer.from service labep_;_;_,�—._ _:_,;-- al... • ; ; ; : ❑signature confirmation t 7 Q 1'5 '0640 0 7' S Q'6 7'0 6 4 i'i i ' III Restricted Delivery f Restricted Delivery µ PS Form 3811 April 2015;PSN 7530-02-000-9053. Domestic Return Receipt do PLE7:E1THIS I � SE6TION ON . - • • A. Signs u ■ Complete items 1,2,and r? ❑Agent ■ Print your name and addrA on the reverse X ❑Addressee [ so that We can return the card to you. B. e' ed by(Pnnt ame) r5��I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, i or on the front if space permits. 1 ery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1._Article Addressed to:-- -----— -- 13 er delivery address below: [3 No f 0% i CAPT REDS MARINE SALES w0 4I PO BOX 528 i cl MATTITUCUCK NY 11952 N Service Typ ❑Priority Mail Express® 1111111111111 Illll 111111111111 I1 Illi 11 ❑Adult Signatu ❑Registered Mai1TM' ❑Adult Sign estricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certifi Delivery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6180 Restricted Delivery ❑Returnrch Receipt for n Delivery Merchandise ollect on Delivery,Restricted.Delivery ❑Signature Confirmaticff- 1 2. Article Number(Transfer from seN_lce labe9 r —I -};ad Mail ;�: El=d Confirmation -- s ` i a 'ed Mail Restricted Delivery t S ResWcted Delivery 7015• []64q" 0007� 506W 7255 `: $500) y Domestic Return Receipt PS Form 381.1,A,pril,2015 PSNi7530-02-000-9053COiOPLETE.THIS SECTION; ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. signature [ ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ,\ ❑Addressee so that We can return the card to you. E. Received by(Printed Name C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, `y„t t `_`q_K.P 11 or on the front if space permits. QX,0)0 1.-Article Addressed to:__ __-- D. Is delivery add i ere t from item 1? 1-1 Yes If YES,gq � below: [3 No 9255 MAIN:RD LLC (iftob �OVA PO BOX 645MATTITUCK NY 11952 vie 3. l II�110111 Iiil Illi l l ll 111111 II I i I II 111 Ilill i 111 13 A❑Adu Ce Type at nature ee Restricted Delivery agistered Mail Mail Restricted ery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 67 0 cert' I® et Return ❑Certifie rioted Delivery Retum Receipt for i ❑Collect on ./ Merchandise ❑Collect on De i ery 13 Signature ConfirmationTm 2._Article Number_CTransfer_from_service.labe0-,-:--_-__�- _ Lalli _ _]signature connrmatton_I 7111_C—L7L1r11 ❑nnZ rrl r-- COMPLE�ETRIS t . I at ' ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Signure CJ Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X G/C /+� ❑Ad essee i so that We can return the Card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. D to of livery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mol piece, G� du I ' ct or on the front if space permits. ❑Yes 1._Article Addressed to:—---- ---� D. is delivery address different from item 1? If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No MEGA STYLE LLC PO BOX 56 MATTITUCK NY 11952 1111 11 11111111111 Ili 3 'r•,irvice Type ❑Priority Mail Express® i 11111111111111111111111111 t Signature ❑Registered MaliTIA R �• � Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted 9596 9403 0380 5163 6?' p 't �'� certified Mau® / O El Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for [3 Collect Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation*" i t [3 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article Number_fTr'' Q�O en' ❑Insured Mail i Restricted Delivery 15 :L 6Vr� ❑Insured Mail Restricted Delivery (over$500 Domestic Return Receipt i; PS Form 3811;April 2015 PSN�7b30-02-000 16053111 i i ■ • 0ECTION ON DELIVERY • . A. Si tura A ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse (, \, ❑Addressee i so that we can return the card to you. g c ' ed rioted Name) C.Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, 116/y-N, or on the front if space permits. 1_Artir.IA ArlrirPccPrt tn:_ _—__--_ __ -- D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes �1 If YES,enter delivery address below: p No 9025 MAIN ROAD LLC }„ai 10095 MAIN RD U Yl lfi it MATTITUCK NY 11952 IIIIIl1lllllllllll Illlllllllll II IIIiIIIIIIIIII 3. Service Type ❑PriorityredMall Mail Exp l � ❑Adult Signature [3 Registered MaIITM ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail@ Delivery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 59 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for [3 Collect an Merchandise ❑Collect on Deliveryry Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confinnation7i f 2. Article Number(Transfer from service/abeq__ ______ •,Ma,l ❑Signature Confirmation' { j , 'Mail Restricted Deli {; Restricted Delivery 72],51 0642 34'22,7 ;5�62,i7;187;`f r_oo)'tl} very i i rl1 I Domestic Return Receipt iPSForm'3811 April 2015'PSN7530,-02-000-9053 COMPLETE • ON DELIVERY ■ • • A. Signature ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. ❑Agent 1 ■ Print your name and address-on the reverse lZI Addressee i so that we can return the card to you. ■ so that this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) �G =a or on the front if space permits. ; ❑ ' 1._Article Addressed_to: _—-- --- D. Is delivery address different from item 17 Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: p No f MARGARET NOONE j 1210 SIGSBEE RD j 1 MATTITUCK NY 11952 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Expresse 4 Ili Illlll IIII IIIII I I 1111111 II I l l 111Illlll11 iII ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered MallT ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mall Restricted ❑Certified WHO I Delivery R s 9590 9403 0380 5163 6180 17 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Deltvaey ❑Return Merchandise Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature ConftrmationTM ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 2. Article Number(Transfer from service labep_______-___ _. i Mail ❑Signature Confirmation t Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 7215 2642 2227 5060 7248 — 500) -- Domestic Return Receipt ; PS;Fami 381'1;April 20115 PSN 7530 02,000=9053 i r=-1-- GOMPLETETHIS • . , SENDER: CO!Wp� 11111111111110 A. Si a re i p Agent ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. X t ❑Addressee ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to YOU. B Rec ed by(Printed Name) C.Date7o�f Delivery j ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, � , ,fig - C� -f or on the front if space permits. i �_Grtir•IP pArlroc¢eri*^'— __ D. t delivery address different from item 17 ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No it 19MES HINES 1 620 SIGSBEE ROAD MATTITUCK NY 11952 j �- 3. Service Type [3 Priority Mall Expresso j+ lllllllll Illi Illll Ill111111Ill 1111Ill Illlll Ill [3 Adult❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Delliivery ded Mail0 Registered Restricted ❑Certified Mall® ❑Return Receipt for I 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 11 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery Merchandise 1 ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation- ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation i 2. Article Number(Transfer from service label) _: ,r - - t}, i;'•;; I ' I ' '' ',f' ' !_�Restrioted Delivery i i b pQ'2 71`-4 9'', estricted Delivery i 17 215 0 6=4 Q"-• I —— -���� —— ---�— Domestic Return Receipt ' Ps Forrti 3811,Apri12015 P$N530-02-000-9053 CPMPLETEI THIS SECTION ON A. Sig at r/ J�� ❑Agent ti ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. X 1. ad-"w ❑Addressee ■ Print your name and address on the reverseC,Date of Delivery so that we can return the card to you. _Rec Ived by(Printed Name) 1 Z D � ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,” -t ,o r w & 11 or on the front if space permits. 3,vvery ad s different from item 17 ❑Yes 1.Article Addressed to: --- ��,— If YES;enter d 'very address below: [3 No SARNO 1T TRUST v 519 DALLAM CT BEL AIR MD 21014 1Priority Mail Express@ \' 3-ServiLre Type [3 Priority Registered Ma,ITM ❑Adult 81 ya it lllllllll Illi11111111Illlll III II if 1111'11II I ~ 0 AA IfleIn d Mal®Restricted Delivery ❑Delliivetry ered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Merchandiselpt for 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 81�t ❑Collect on Delivery ❑Signature Confiirmation- ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature Confirmation 2. Article f�lUrnber(>ranSferflOm Service lahell_--- -- — lail, Restricted Delivery 4 2. 2 2 27 _5 2 6 Q : 7118' wcr��oja I Restricted,Delivery ; 7015- 2 6- Domestic Return Receipt P,S Form;3811,'?pril 2015 PSN,7,530-p2000 9053 f I • • • • ' ■ Complete items 1,2;and 3. A. f§natur ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. dresses , ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B ive ;�R� d am C.Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is el'a e� iff rent from item 1? 13 Yes -- -- If 26, ss ss below: ❑No S JOHN FETZKO 1120 SIGBEE RD MATTITUCK NY 11952 IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII III111111111 Il II ILII IIIII III ervlceTyp� RegisteredM p ss® It Signature { ± ❑ I Slgnature Resd Deliverl ❑Registered Mail Restricted; 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 98 ❑Ce Mad®' / Delivery13 !y { ❑Colle 119 1�RestdcteVLD- Cl Return ❑Collect on-- ed Delivery i❑Signature ConfirmatlonTO { 2. Article Number_(Transfer-fromiservice,laben_!- :, l ❑Signature Confirmation 7 015 0 6 4'01 t0 0 0 7°i 5°0 6 0'i71°2 51'' i i lestncted'oallvery ';�' Restricted Delivery { PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt 1 ® ® • • • ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X 13 Agent l I so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Printed Name) C.Date of Delivery or on the frdlit if space permits. 1-Articie Addressed_to: _ D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑Yes j NiSY, Il If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No ANNA SOURLIS 21-3638T4 REET ASTORIA NTt.11105 , II 1111111 IIII III I I I I I II I III II I IIII IIIII I II I III 3.13 tre 13 Mail ExpressO Signature Registered a11 dul5natureRestricted Delivery 11 Registereded Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mad® Delivery 9590 9403 0380 5163 6179 97 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt for ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number r(Transfer from service/aben-, _❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmatlonTm i = � Mail ❑Signature Confirmation ?0150640 0007 5060 7224 _ 0 Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form'3817;%Apfll 2015 PSN 7530'd2-600-9053' 1 6 Domestic Return Receipt f! F l t t ,t tilt '1_ 1 I .Iti i:i 1 f i I � I i, • • 0 • • 'DELIVERY l ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3. A. Slgnature ` I( ■ Print your name and address on the reverse XE3 Agent (((( so that we can return the card to you. PJ,"( ❑Addressee , I ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. R ei d ) C. Date of Delivery f y(Printed Name or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ____ D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No FELIZ MULE I' 115 LITTLE NECK RD DOUGLASTON NY 11363 �II1111111 IIII III I I I I I III III III IIII IIIIIIIII III 3. Service Type , f.❑Priority Mad Express® ❑Adult Signature a ❑Registered Mailm ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery—"❑Registered Mail Restrictedr 9590 9403 0380 5163 6178 05 ❑Certified Mail® Delivery `I ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑Return Receipt fol ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2._Article_Numher_(Transfer_fiom sary Q Igl u _ _13_Q llecn on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑Signature ConfirmationTM --,'1 ❑Signature Confirmation 1 7 015. 0 6 4,0 : 0 0 0 7 5 0 6 0 7 0 3 3. I Restncted Delivery 1 Restricted Delivery �. I PS Fprm 38111;,4pri1;201;5 PSN 7530;p2-000-9053 JDomestic Return Receipt r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD l ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Pouu- A"S L,k SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK AFFIDAVIT OF In the Matter of the Application of POSTING <� 402�,� // 11 (Name of Appl' ants) RECEIVED Regarding Posting of Sign upon JAN Applicant's Land Identified as Z �� SCTM Parcel#1000- e ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I ��' PWIX- residing at a Z ' ' Az� leaf+ &cA— New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the day of / , 201 , I personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten(10) feet or closer from the street or right-of- way(driveway entrance)—facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance,* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven (7) days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be Fr/e� riT (Signature) Swornto before me this Day of 14Aj , 201 VICKI T Notary Public Statee o of New York �u No.01` 90696 (Notary Public) Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires July 28,20 * near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passerby. NuTlVE GF HEARING The following application will be heard by the' , Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall , 53095 Main Road, Southold : NAME : 9300 ROUTE 25 , INC . ( PAWLOWSKI ) # 6914 SCTM # : 1 000- 1 22-7-9 VARIANCE : SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST: ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP CLUB DATE : THURS . , FEB . 41 2016 90m15 AM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765-1809 `t ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: http://southtown.northfork.net January 11, 2016 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 -Public Notices for Thursday, February 4, 2016 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of The Suffolk Times. 1) Before January 18th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Southold Town Assessors' Office, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable you are requested to make other attempts to, obtain-a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the-cur-rent owner,- to thebestof your ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement, or during the hearing providing the returned letter to us as soon as possible; AND not later than January 25th: Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, along with the green/white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you later by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any envelope is returned "undeliverable", please advise this office as soon as possible. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) Not Later January 27th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at the subject property seven (7) days (or more) prior to hearing. (It is the applicant/agents responsibility to maintain sign until Public Hearing) Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, not more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is supplied for posting on both front yards. Please deliver or mail your Affidavit of Posting for receipt by our office before February 2, 2016. If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. (PLEASE DISPLAY YOUR HOUSE NUMBER ALWAYS). Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. #12607 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successfully commencing on the 28th day of January, 2016. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this day of Q k2016. - -- — NA VOLINSI I WTAW PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK Nb, 01V06105050 lbiYd)iflecl In Suffolk County Ia9V'F;o"Rfrr;1s11r0t1 E•k-pirel r-€5ruary 28, 2016 Main Road;(aka NYS Route.25Y Matti- GROUP.LLC#6918-Request for Vari- ticle XXVI Section 280-146D.request= tuck,NY-SCTM#1000-122-7-9- ance from Article III Section 280-15 and ing Reversal of the building inspector's ( 9:45 A.M. - UHLEMANN FAM- the Building`Inspector's September 18, Notice of Disapproval datedaAugust,31,; ILY -2012'-IRREVOCABLE TRUST 2015,amended December 8,2015 Notice 2015 requiring site plan approval under #6916--This is a request for a Waiver of Disapproval based on an application Article XIII Section 280�51A(2);located• 1_of Merger under Article II, Section for building permit for construction of a at 1900:.Great•,Pecomc BayBoulevardf 280-10A,-to-unmerge land-identified as new single family dwelling,an in-ground (adj. to_Brushes;Creek) ,I' ref,-LNY SCTM #1000-106-11-12, based;on the swimming pool, conversion of existing SCTM#1000;x45-4- 3 Building Inspector's December_5,2015 -dwelling to pool house and legalize ex- 1:15 P.1VL- DONNA:WEXLER-and Notice of Disapproval, which states a isting accessory garage, at; 1) proposed RODNEYT.rOUAR9#6920 Request; Vnonconfonrimg lot shall merge with an in-ground swimming pool location other for Vanarice from Article III•Sectipn 280; adjacent conforming,or nonconform- than the code required rear yard,2)exist- 13 and the B'tiildmg Inspector's Novem- ingilot held in common ownership until ing proposed pool house and accessory ber23,2015 Notice of Disapproval based Ithe[-total lot,size conforms to the cur- garage location other than the code re-- on an application for biulding.pennit for •rent bulk schedule'(minimum 40,000 quired rear yard, located at`5375 Sound conversi(in of an attic to Y`as built"habit- ,square feet'in this R-40 Residential Avenue Mattituck,NY SCTM#1000-121- able space jo an existing dwelling,at ,1) I Zone District) this lot is merged,with 1-34 more thah,1he code n�a>�irdiiiil number 6f lots lOOD-106-11-13,14,& 16, 16cated 11:10 A.M.-RUSSELL and SUSAN stories tw es of o'and'a hall;'-located•at.,1775 I at, 350 South Drive, 1260-Bayview HEARN#6915-Request for Vanances Indian-Neck--Lan!:.(adj:-tb xkj� hin6nd- Avenue, 1310 Bayview Avenue;-and from Article XXIII Section 280-124 and - Creek) Peconic;NY.'3C'TNI#1'000-86-5- 1400 Bayview Avenue Mattituck, NY the Building Inspector's December 7, 9.1 SCTM#'s1000-106-11-12,13,14•&16 2015 Notice of Disapproval based on an 1:30 P.M.-DONNA WEXLER and,t 10:10 A.M.-•RICHARD and`KATH- application for building permit to con- RODNEY T.OUARTY#6919--;.kppli= LEEN•O'TOOLE #6913 - Request for struct additions and alterations to exist- cant requests a Special.Exceptibri under'. ! Variance fr6mArticle III Section 280-15F ing single family dwelling,at,l)less than Article III,Section 280-13B(13)"The Ap= and the Building Inspector's November 9, the code required rear yard setback of plicant is the owner requesting authoriza- 2015 Notice of Disapproval based on an 35 feet,2)more than the maximum code • tion to establish-dn Acces`s6m Apartment application-.for building permit=for ac- allowable lot-coverage of 20%,located in an access'o struetu 8z 2 accesso ry ) rl.. LEGAd'PIOTICE �" cessory in-ground swimming pool,at;1) at 535 Meadow Lane Cutchogue, NY. apartment,excbeds`code.maziimum`5] SOUTHOLD TOWN�QVINh, proposed in location other than the code SCTM#1000-116-2-20 ''`-" lowed square•�eet�oF;750'Tgcated�at•1775 ' BOARD OF APPEALS - required rear yard or front-yard on wa- 11:30 A.M. = RICHARD and LISA Indian Neck Lane (adj.`ro'Richmond THURSDAY FEBRUARY 4;2016 terfront property,located at 700 Peconic ISRAEL#6917 - Request for Variance Creek)•Peconic, NX a'SCTM1k10p0 86-5-, PUBLIC HEARINGS Bay Boulevard-(adj. to Great.;Peconic from Article XXIII Section 280-124 and 91, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pur- Bay)Laurel;NY.SCTM#1000-145-2-6 the Building Inspector's-October 21�-• - 2':06 PM-.-" li<SA GILLOOLY#6922' suant to Section 267 of the Town Law and 10.30 A.M.-STEPHEN and ARDA 2015,amended November 2,2015 Notice Request for Variances, from Article Town Code Chapter 280(Zoning),Town HARATUNIAN #6911 - Request for of Disapproval based on an application XXIII Section 280-124,Article IIT Sec- --r of Southold,the following public hearings Variance from Arficle NMI Section 280- for building permit to demolish exist- tion 280-15C&F and Article XXIr Sec- will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN 116A (1) and the Building Inspector's ing dwelling and construct a new single tion 280-105A and the Building Inspec ZONING BOARD OFAPPEALS at the November 5,2015 Notice of Disapproval family dwelling with elevated patio, at, tor's October 19,2015 Notice of,Disap-, Town Hall,53095 Main Road,PO.Box based on an application fdr building per- 1)less than the minimum code required proval, last amended January 5, 2016 1179,Southold,New York 11971-0959,on mit to demolish existing dwelling and front yard setback of 35 feet,2)accessory based on an application for building per- THURSDAY FEBRUARY 4 2016. construct a new single family dwelling,at; shed in location other than,granted in mit to construct an accessory garage,"as 9:15 A.M. - 9300 ROUTE 25 INC 1)less than the code required bluff set- prior ZBA#4815,located at 685 Osprey built"deck addition and"as built"fence, (PAWLOWSKI) #6914 - Request for back of 100 feet,located at.1205 Sound- Nest Loop Road(adj.to Gull Pond Inlet) at,1)accessory Garage:proposed at more Special Exception per Article III Code view Avenue Extension(adj to Long Is- Greenport,NY.SCTM#1000-35-6-27 than the code maximum square footage Section 280-13B(7),the applicant is re- land Sound)Southold,NY. SCTM#1000- 12:00 P.M.-FRANK•T,and ELIZA- allowed of 750 square feet,2)Accessory questing permission to construct an an- 50-2-13 BETH G.KELLY#6898—(Adjourned garage proposed 9t less than the code re- nual membership club,located at: 9300 10:50 A.M. - ISLAND• ESTATE from 1/7/16)This is a request under Ar- quired front yard setback of 40 feet from Office Location: �\DF SQ�jyo Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road- 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 l = Southold,NY 11971-0959 lycOUNTY,��� . http://southoldtown.northfork.net D E C E - E BOARD OF APPEALS DEC 16 2015 j TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 Southold Town Planning lard MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson DATE: December 16, 2015 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA# 6914 PAWLOWSKI, Paul The ZBA is reviewing the following application. Enclosed are copies of Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZBA application, current map on file. Your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. APPLICANT TAX# ZBA# HEARING CODE DATE OF PREPARER ZONE DATE SECTION STAMPED OF SURVEY DIST SURVEY Pawlowski, 1000-122- 6914 Feb. 4, Art III Sec 280- November Barrett Paul 7-9 2016 13 14, 2015 Bonacci & Van Weele Your comments are requested 1 week prior to hearing date. Thank you. Ends. \ t Office Location: of S0(/jyOlO Mailing_Address: Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 • Q Southold,NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 December 16, 2015 Ms. Sarah Lansdale, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Ms. Lansdale : Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: - -- ZBA File#-6914 Owner/Applicant:PAINLOSKI, Paul-- Action aul -Action Requested: Special Exception for an Athletic Club. Within 500 feet of: (X) State or County Road ( ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. (X) Boundary of Agricultural District ( ) Boundary of any Village or Town If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman ZBA Chairperson Ln B .L Y• Encls. SEE SEC NO 114 ' MATCH_ —LINE 14 161A( erls VTI+] c) o F 1_ E x ! ,5 ,w o, 16 ° O•p / c 8 - _ ser. P +°s 446 17 2 2''3'j0 '` 19 F i �� __� ✓ �� .,$ N 0 �QS`/��t`7s 8 O �\ � N$ 20 nO�T$�9 A� ��6 '✓`�y2U �, P U , ,0 38i r� 5.2 128A(c) "r + ea ++e es M _� rx Z wy_ � .� l y,e11y n m �m n ,�6�fid° sae°�,•� M1 1-a��-^ 1�y /��/ ' vm + 364 s ti3 4r"° m ry ryry° 9y I f9"o` —�!' a CIS 5g ao '� < ,.8A 13 14��26 ° m.0 U 1 X 14 3A(c) 1 !q:3 _ 28.1 29 30 31 32 / ,. +RD. (60') 361 COUNTY OR-� SUFFOL-fj. �c%"0�8 $ 6 �, ' � � — I °{ � I �f � I �„�a •• H /� 47143 / —� pl�1,43 Nb a 'U 4 ' J) � i� r 1 ,1 a" es e 1A 9 8 � I + r ( 14� —. 8 0 ry9 P �� i °'19` v�8a ,x-111 — I � y�'L01 °g re ^O'�O•• a ? a, 75A 1 8 // D W� n A / ) ® -�� 23 AV m ti Lei t9. \. 13 8A(c) 'V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GREE �49 � tLh F 208A �' '� NnuEr+ls'ATER uro1 � O' 1 \ Q 6A 4 NIP` 5 s 66 g67' °6 8 1 OA(c) 7 � 9 1, r 39P\o\ g A AP�cI M1 89 �P 51.8A ' Mp1C� Lq9� A e py y p FOR PCL NO F c' SEE SEC NO Q�GOCY qb —Z UNE --------------- ---------_-----_—LINE MATCH— SEE SEC NO 126 LION VEEN StlreNOlYrd lire --SCM-- lI,EnN Dacia Ure --H-- UNLESS IXUY.NOiMERMSE NLLP-RTIES NOTICE C5� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © � PAE YA lH N THE FOLL01NN0 OSIRICIS Imrl,s,oam Lire .f•J E 2 Fw Oaua wre ——v—— ——R—— MAINTENANCE ALTERATION SALE OR `V SaooL „R SENIER `""" � Real Property Tax Service Agency — uRE H,—T DISTRIBUTION OF ANY PORTION OF THE County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 LIeNo,actUm --L-- Wpnu Pain tare--a-- SUFFOLK—LINTYTAKMAPIS PROHIBITED—HOUT—TTENPERMISSIONOF THE ja6[4i !