Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-102.-4-6.1 MAILING SS: PLANNINGS ttfl P.O. Box 1173 DONALD J.WILCENS �`� ��;�� Southold, NY 11371 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Torn Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICII IIl (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) RTIN H.SID®R Southold, NY x ; 1 0 Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 6, 2017 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Denial: Proposed Site Plan for Ackerman Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Route 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackerman: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, June 5, 2017: WHEREAS, this Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 8,162 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn (7,142 sq. ft. footprint and 1,020 sq. ft. attic storage) on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 2016, William Ackerman, owner, submitted an application for Site Plan review; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2016, the Planning Board accepted the application as complete for review; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2016, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2016, William Ackerman, owner, submitted building elevation plans with more detail to the Planning Board for review as requested; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2016, a Public Hearing was held and the Planning Board heard comments from the public regarding the proposed project including, but not limited to, concerns questioning the size and use of the building and on site operations on Town Development Rights land. The Planning Board determined to hold the hearing open with information to be provided by the applicant; and Ackerman Ag Barn Page 2 of 2 June 6 2017 WHEREAS, on October 7, 2016, the Planning Board sent a letter to the applicant requesting certain information and materials regarding the building; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2016, William Ackerman, owner, submitted a floor plan schematic and the second floor plan; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2016, the Planning Board sent a letter to the applicant requesting a list of properties managed by North Fork Viticulture Services; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2016, William Ackerman, submitted materials and information with regard to the 11/1/16 Planning Board letter; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2016, the Public Hearing was held open until November 21, 2016 for written comment; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2016, the Planning Board sent a request to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), requesting an interpretation of the use of the barn as a base of operations for a business that manages vineyards in other locations in addition to the eight acres of vines on the subject property. During the Public Hearing, it was questioned whether the use for this building is a commercial use or contractors yard rather than an agricultural use, given that the business model is based on managing vineyards that are not owned by the applicant; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 2017, the ZBA issued the following Code Interpretation for file #7037: "The use as proposed by North Fork Viticulture Services (NFVS) to erect a barn for the storage of equipment used in a business wherein NFVS manages vineyards unrelated to the agricultural operation on the subject property, is not an allowed use or accessory use, pursuant to Section 280-13(A)(2) of the Town Code of the Town of Southold"; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby denies the Site Plan application for the Ackerman Agricultural Barn referenced above, including the Site Plan entitled "Ackermann Property" prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler , P.E., dated July 12, 2016. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office at 631-765-1938. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman BOARD MEMBERS ..az, Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ) f q SOO, 53095 Main Road•P.O.Box 1179 S Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank Gerard P.Goehringer .„ 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento Sot'll I ,'i UN http://southoldtownny.gov MiAY�0 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS F SOUTHOLDa�i�a'9T�rYrl tit TOWN O ffis4a6d Tel.(631) 765-1809 Fax(631) 765-9064 " M '' fiuFINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION 4 201 MEETING OF MAY 4,2017 , ZBA 1711.13: #7073, Code Interpretation 1*ulhuld To,7,11 0f r NAME�OF„wAPPLICANT: Southold Town Planning Board PROPERTY LOCATION: 1350 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue NY St;TM No. 1000-101-4-6.1 PROPERTY FACTS/D...........ESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 22.8 acre parcel in the Agricultural Conservation (AC) Zoning District that has had the development rights sold (hereinafter "DRS land") and located on the easterly side of Alvahs Lane in Cutchogue, and north of Main Road (NYS Route 25). Approximately 8 acres are in agricultural production as a vineyard. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The Southold Town Planning Board has requested that the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals make a determination, pursuant to Article XXVI, § 280-146 (D)(1) of the Town Code, as to whether the use set forth in the Site Plan Application of North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC (hereinafter "NFVS"), is a commercial use or contractor's yard, as opposed to an agricultural use, given that the applicant intends to build a barn that is proposed to store agricultural equipment that is used in their local vineyard management and consulting business. BACKGROUND: The Board of Appeals received a memorandum dated December 2, 2016 from the Chairman of the Southold Town Planning Board, on behalf of the Planning Board, related to a pending application in which the applicant,NFVS, was seeking site plan approval "for an 8,162 sq. ft. barn (7,142 sq. ft. footprint and 1,020 sq. ft. attic storage) proposed for agricultural equipment storage" on property located at 1350 Alvahs Lane in Cutchogue (hereinafter referred to as "the subject property"). The subject property is located in the AC Zoning District which allows certain agricultural operations and related accessory uses. Specifically, Section 280-13(A) (2) provides the following: The following agricultural operations and accessory uses thereto, including irrigation, provided that there shall be no storage of manure, fertilizer or other odor- or dust producing substance or use, except spraying and dusting to protect vegetation, within 150 feet of any lot line: Page 2, May 4,2017 #7073,Town of Southold Planning Board—(NFVS, LLC, aka Ackerman Barn) SCTM No. 1000-102.-4-6.1 (a) The raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises. (b) The keeping, breeding, raisin and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl (except ducks)t on lots of 10 acres or more. (c) Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic- covered) and other related structures, provided that such buildings shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings. (d) The retail sale of local produce from structures of less than 20 square feet floor area shall be set back at least 10 feet from any lot line. Here, in its application, NFVS has stated that the proposed barn will not only be used to store equipment used on the subject property and other land leased and farmed by NFVS, but it will also store equipment that is used in the management of other vineyards that are not owned or leased by NFVS. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NFVS has proposed an 8,162 sq. ft. equipment storage barn(7,142 sq. ft. footprint and 1,020 sq. ft, attic storage) on a 22.8 acre parcel of DRS land,that will store equipment used to maintain the eight acres of vineyard on the subject property, to farm other land leased by NFVS, and in NVFS' consulting business of managing other vineyards on the North Fork of Long Island. PUD BEFORETHE ���OAR.1 OF �aPl?`),1 On March 2, 2017, the Board _ 1C 11��, II�I�C�BEF,... held a public hearing to take testimony and other evidence related to the Planning Board's request for an interpretation as to whether the use as proposed by NFVS constituted a "commercial use or contractor's yard rather than an agricultural use." Several members of the public appeared and testified at the hearing. Initially, neither the principal of NFVS, William Ackerman, nor any other representative of NFVS were present at the hearing. Eventually, a representative of NFVS, Gwen Groocock, appeared and was heard. The board received wide ranging testimony from the public. Many of those testifying owned neighboring properties along Alvahs Lane. Much of the testimony focused on issues such as the impact the proposed use would have on the subject property; whether such activity was allowed on land where the development rights had been sold; the activities the property owner has undertaken since purchasing the property and the impact on the surrounding properties; the veracity of the statements made by Mr. Ackerman in his testimony before the Planning Board and in correspondence, and the size of the barn and whether a barn that size is appropriate and necessary to farm the subject property. Among those who testified was Abigail Wickham, a local attorney who does a significant amount of zoning work within the Town of Southold. Ms. Wickham opined that the proposed use is not allowed in the AC zoning district under Section 280-13 of the Town Code on the grounds that although Section 280-13 does allow barns and Page 3, May 4,2017 #7073,Town of Southold Planning Board—(NFVS, LLC, a.k.a Ackerman Barn) SCTM No. 1000-102.-4-6.1 storage buildings, they are listed under the umbrella of an agricultural use on the property. Here the proposed use contemplates storage of equipment used in a commercial enterprise to service and support other people's vineyards. As stated above, Gwen Groocock appeared on behalf of NFVS. Ms. Groocock stated that NFVS intends to farm the entire parcel in that, in addition to the 8 acres in grape production, the rest of the parcel will be used as a pasture for livestock. She went on to state that the same equipment that is used to service other people's vineyards is also used to tend to their vineyard. Ms. Groocock described in depth the operations of NFVS; including that they lease land where they grow grapes, that they manage the vineyards for certain wineries and simply act as a consultant for others. She explained the number of employees, and where the equipment is stored during the season, among other things. At the close of testimony, the Board left the hearing open for written comments until March 16, 2017. WRITTEN D(.)C L.JM N l� TION: After the hearing the Board received additional letters of support and opposition from the public which, for the most part, mirrored the testimony given at the public hearing. The Board also received additional written correspondence from NFVS principal William Ackerman, stating that no equipment used in its management business would be stored in the proposed barn. This letter is in direct conflict with Mr. Ackerman's previous testimony before the Planning Board, as well as written correspondence to the Planning Board and to this Board. Ultimately, this statement is irrelevant as to the Board's determination because the matter before the Board is to make an interpretation as to the use as applied for to the Planning Board. Fl-NDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FO[Z BOARD AC110N 1. The limited issue before this Board is the Planning Board's request for a determination as to whether the use as proposed"is a commercial use or contractor's yard rather than an agricultural use." Since the subject property is located in the AC zoning district, the only issue for the Board to decide is whether the proposed use is allowed under Section 280- 13 of the Town Code as a principle or accessory use to agricultural production. 2. Much of the testimony and written comments submitted to the Board focused on whether the proposed use was allowed pursuant to the Deed of Development Rights which transferred the development rights for the subject parcel to the Town of Southold. That deed states that the only allowed use of the property is agricultural production as defined by what was then Chapter 25 of the Town Code. The successor to Chapter 25 is Chapter 70 of the Town Code. The Board is charged with and has jurisdiction to interpret and make determinations under Chapter 280 of the Town Code. Therefore the Board is without jurisdiction to make a determination as to whether or not the proposed use meets the definition of"Agricultural Production" under a chapter within the Town Code other than Chapter 280. Page 4, May 4,2017 #7073,Town of Southold Planning Board—(NFVS, LLC, a.k.a Ackerman Barn) SCTM No. 1000-102.-4-6.1 3. The Board received substantial testimony and written comment about the impact the proposed use would have on the subject property and surrounding properties; whether such activity was allowed on land where the development rights had been sold; the veracity of the statements made by Mr. Ackerman in his testimony before the Planning Board and in correspondence, and the size of the proposed barn and whether the proposed 8,162 sq. ft. barn is an appropriate and necessary size for the subject property. If Mr. Ackerman was seeking a variance or a special exception permit before this Board, or a site plan approval before the Planning Board, those issues would be relevant and important considerations. However, they are simply not relevant to the limited issue currently before the Board of Appeals. 4. In addition, the testimony and written comments on behalf of NFVS is largely irrelevant. There was much testimony regarding the farm operations on the subject property. Since agricultural operations are an allowed use in the zone district in which the subject parcel is located, the proposed uses as a vineyard and pasture for raising cattle are allowed. However, the issue before this Board is whether the storage of equipment on the subject property, to be used in a commercial business managing other people's vineyards, is an allowed use and/or accessory use. As stated above, in one of his correspondence, Mr. Ackerman stated that the equipment stored at the property would only be used for the subject property and equipment used to manage other vineyards would be stored elsewhere. This correspondence is contrary to the application to the Planning Board, and to Mr. Ackerman's testimony and other written correspondence as well as the representative of NFVS who testified at the public hearing. Although the Board questions the veracity of the statement by Mr. Ackerman, it is ultimately irrelevant to the Board's decision because the question before the Board is to decide whether the equipment storage is an allowed use as proposed in the application to the Planning Board. 5. As set forth above, Section 280-13 (a)(2) states that allowed uses in the AC zoning district include: ... agricultural operations and accessory uses thereto, including irrigation, provided that there shall be no storage of manure, fertilizer or other odor- or dust producing substance or use, except spraying and dusting to protect vegetation, within 150 feet of any lot line: (a) The raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises. bb) The keeping, breeding, raisin and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl (except ducks)L1 on lots of 10 acres or more. Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic- covered) and other related structures, provided that such buildings shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings. Page 5, May 4,2017 47073,Town of Southold Planning Board—(NFVS, LLC, a.k.a Ackerman Barn) SCTM No. 1000-102.-4-6.1 The retail sale of local produce from structures of less than 20 square feet floor area shall be set back at least 10 feet from any lot line. The Board finds that the purpose of Subsection (c) is to allow barns and storage buildings as an accessory use to the allowed uses in Subsection (a) and (b), namely the raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, and the keeping and breeding, raising and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl. 6. The Board finds that since, in its application to the Planning Board,NFVS states that the purpose of the proposed barn is to store equipment that is used in a commercial business that maintains other people's vineyards, the use as proposed is not an allowed use in the AC zoning district pursuant to Section 280-13 (A) (2) of the Town Code. Section 280-146 D)(1) of the Town Code states that the Zoning Board of Appeals may determine the meaning of any provision contained in Chapter 280 upon the request of any Town officer, board or agency. Therefore, the Board finds that,pursuant to Section 280-146(D)(1), the Board has jurisdiction to make the interpretation requested by the Planning Board as to whether the use proposed by NFVS is an allowed use under Section 280-13 of the Town Code. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried to determine that: THE USE AS PROPOSED BY NFVS TO ERECT A BARN FOR THE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT USED IN A BUSINESS WHEREIN NFVS MANAGES VINEYARDS UNRELATED TO THE AGIRCULTURAL OPERATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, IS NOT AN ALLOWED USE OR ACCESSORY USE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 280-13(A)(2) OF THE TOWN CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. Vote of the Board. Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Dante, Goehringer and Planamento (MemberAcampora abstained). This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). (JwU Leslie l��t�ac ......�.�, P.......... Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing -'�5 / 9 /2017 March 20, 2017LEI, , E Q M f To: The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold Z 201 From: Benja Schwartz nnfigTo Re: Undated memorandum, received by the ZBA on 3.16.17, headed: Plannini�Board To:Leslie Weisman,ZBA Chairperson and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From:William C.Ackermann,Owner,North Fork viticultural Services(NFVS) When Ackermann writes >> I, William C. Ackermann, am a longtime North Fork resident and grape-grower and owner of NFVS. This self identification of applicant leaves out the owner of the subject property. Undoubtedly Mr. Ackermann will eventually identify himself as the Operating Officer of the holding company, . But his failure to mention the fact that there is a holding company is another reflection of his lack of candor with the Town of Southold. When Ackermann writes >> The concept right now is to raise a small number of grass-fed cattle for non-commercial use. It is essentially another admission that the primary use of the subject property is as a base for providing NFVS services to other farms. The grapes planted by the previous owner and the proposed livestock are clearly only incidental uses and incidentally are the only proposed uses of the property for agricultural production. If the livestock will be non commercial then they would not be part of a "working" farm. The work applicant intends to accomplish on the farm on Alvah's Lane is reflected by the deed dated February 4th, 2016 from the prior owner to NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC with offices at PO Box 633 Laurel NY 11948 and 1350 Alvoih(sic) Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935. When asked by the Planning Board if the proposed building would include an office Ackermann said, no. The deed dated March 14th, 2016 NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC to NFVS HOLDINGS, LLC states that both are located at 1350 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935. It may just be a clerical error, but the copy of said deed in the laserfiche copy of the Planning Board site plan application file is missing the first page. There does not seem to be any mention in the site plan application of the fact that the subject property belongs to NFVS HOLDINGS, LLC. Land use regulations apply to land not landowners, but shouldn't an application for land development identify the owner as well as the authority of any and all agent's appearing as applicants? Also notable is that the only mention of development rights in favor of the Town of Southold is in the reference in the deed dated 2.4.16 to the prior owner's title. There is no reference to the development rights in the deed dated 3.14.16 from NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC to NFVS HOLDINGS, LLC. When Ackermann writes >> the livestock fencing was installed in the early summer of 2016, and the grading, disking, seeding, irrigation lines and mowing done in the summer and fall, with equipment designed to be used on the Alvah's Lane farm, long before the Planning Board's public hearing in November. It opens the door to an inquiry into the truth of what has occurred on the property since Ackermann took possession, and when such activities have occurred. Ackermann's information neglects to state what if anything has occurred since the Planning Board's public hearing in November. When Ackermann writes >> It is important to understand that the equipment to be stored in the barn is ALL used on the Alvah's Lane farm, some of which is also used on the leased vineyards, as it is not feasible to have separate sets of equipment for leased property. Please note that equipment used on "managed vineyards" is housed in rented barns on a separate parcel of land. Running a farm or vineyard of any size requires the same equipment; more acreage simply means more time spent working. The fuzzy logic of the last sentence, which implicitly denies that many farming operations are time sensitive, reflects the lack of credibility of the assertion that "equipment used on "managed vineyards" is housed in rented barns on a separate parcel of land". If it is true, where are the rented barns, and will the equipment continue to be stored in rented barns, or as the attached schematic showing equipment in a winter storage configuration, and as statements by applicant reflect, will equipment currently being used, and that will be used, on "managed vineyards" be moved to Alvah's Lane as soon as the site plan application is concluded? When Ackermann writes >> The Land Preservation Department reviewed the application and approved it. Ackermann is being dishonest. The Land Preservation Department webpage states >> The Land Preservation Department and volunteer Land Preservation Committee ... review proposed uses on properties subject to easements... From a preceding statement on the webpage it is clear that reviews of, and recommendations on, potential purchases of development rights are made to the Town Board. It is not clear to whom recommendations based on reviews of proposed uses on properties subject to easements are made. It appears that land uses on properties subject to easements without buildings are not monitored. When Ackermann writes >> However, at the public hearing, some non-farming neighbors protested the barn Ackermann reveals that he does not know his neighbors. One of the so called "non-farming neighbors" is a member of the family that owned and farmed the subject property and sold the development rights to Southold Town. That neighbor is a descendant of the farmers who taught Hargraves how to drive tractors and farm. Applicant's failure to recognize the fact that his neighbor is a retired farmer and is supportive of real farming, reveals his failure to consider himself a part of our community. When Ackermann writes >> The DRS deed for 1350 Alvah's Lane references the Southold Town Code which states that development rights sold property is limited to agricultural use, INCLUDING storage of agricultural equipment. Ackermann purposely leaves out the type of agricultural uses permitted. Specifically uses for the purpose of agricultural PRODUCTION, not uses for the purposes of provision of agricultural equipment, services and management. A "vineyard management/vineyard consulting company' is related to agriculture, but is not exclusively engaged in the core mission of farming, agricultural production. Nobody is trying to stop NFVS from growing grapes and grass on the farm, but tending eight acres of vines planted by prior owners does not make the whole farm a vineyard. Nobody is denying that farmers traditionally work together. But leasing a few additional acres close to a farm, and utilizing the same equipment purchased and required for farming on the farm is one thing. It is an entirely different thing, to pursue a business model based on offsite agricultural production, management and consulting. Storage of equipment for use on leased land and managed vineyards should not be permitted on protected farmland. When Ackermann writes >> there is nothing in the Southold Town code that limits, determines or uses a formula to dictate the size of a barn on DRS land, nor the amount of equipment a farmer of DRS land may own. Ackermann implies that if he wanted to, he could build a skyscraper on the protected farmland and vertically store an army of tractors, spreaders and sprayers. Ackerman is no stranger to the effects of selling development rights. At a Town Board Meeting on February 19, 1998 Ackermann's offer to sell development rights on 57.8 acres of farmland was formally accepted by the Town Board. He did not follow thru with that sale. On information and belief, his successor in interest to that property eventually sold the development rights to Suffolk County. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to permit the some parts and prohibit other parts of the businesses of NFVS. As a matter of practicality, the site plan for the proposed warehouse garage should be denied. The Town of Southold should issue a cease and desist order to stop all off site businesses from operating on the protected farmland, without prejudice to possible future application for permits to farm from the subject property a reasonable amount of leased vineyards if and only if the vines on the leased vineyards are planted by applicant. The instant proceeding is being conducted to decide if the Town of Southold should approve the proposed site plan. The determination of the instant proceeding will also set a precedent for future development applications on farmlands protected by Deeds of Development Rights held by the Town of Southold. The Decision of the Planning Board will not only apply pre-existing law, it will create law. When these Deeds of Development Rights were made, neither the sellers nor the buyers knew exactly what they meant. The meaning of these easements is evolving as applications to develop on the farmlands are filed. The general terms of the Deeds and of the referenced local legislation will be vested with more specific meanings by current application to the specific facts in this case and by potential future application to other cases. From Southold 2020 Comprehensive Plan Draft Land Preservation Chapter August 31, 2012 Protected Ian&in Southold Town 4 Owner R Type of Protected LandTotal `• New York State Open Space 508.70 New York Slate Parkland 378.20 Perk Dlstdct 168.20 -- -- Pdvate"'Farmland Development Rights 198.45 j Prtvate Open 5 ace 944.91 = Southold Town Farmland Development MOW 2285.56 ' Subdlvislon Open Space 740.31 + } Y ~ Suffolk County Farmland Development RI hts 1660.85 Suffolk County Open Space 512.35 - Suffolk County Parkland 133.73 °. Town Open Space 569.62 •," r Town Parkland 68.24 Town/County PartnershIp Open Space _189.45 Grand Total 8358.57 According to this table, there are at least 2,285.56 acres of similar farmland spread out throughout the North Fork. According to the draft of the Land Preservation Chapter which this chart belongs to, Goal 1.2 is to Continue to purchase farmland development rights to preserve farmland. Goal 1.1, to Ensure Southold Town Code &policies encourage and advance the business of agriculture. Includes Goal 1.1.2.e. Define a development right and what uses remain after development rights are purchased. In other words, is the purchase of a development right simply to prohibit residential development? What uses remain intact after a sale of development rights? Clarify this in the Town Code. Contrary to the last quoted sentence, the Deeds of Development Rights are written in general language so that they can be interpreted in contexts of specific facts. Also relevant to the instant proceeding is Goal 4. Land Stewardship. Land Stewardship is an important aspect of the land preservation program and involves managing the land the Town owns, as well as monitoring the easements it holds over lands where development rights were purchased or where preservation was a condition of a subdivision approval. The purpose for managing and monitoring land preserved with Town funds is to ensure the use of those lands, if any, meets the purpose(s) for which they were preserved. Emphasis was added to focus on the relevance to the instant proceeding. Until programs for monitoring these easements are developed, the Town of Southold will continue to rely on citizen's complaints and opposition to applications like the current application to raise, and to decide, these issues. Considering the obvious dishonesty, blatant disrespect and express hostility that pervade the Applicant's statements made in connection with this application for site plan approval, Applicant's statements deserve to be subjected to a healthy dose of scrutiny. Applicant's plans should be required to be fully, clearly and fairly presented before any development is permitted, and before any further business operations are allowed on the protected farmland. Sincerely Yours, j f PS: The above quotes from the 2012 Draft of the Land Preservation Chapter of the latest attempt to produce an express comprehensive plan for the Town of Southold are no less valid because they have not been adopted. And, the authority of the opinion contrary thereto is likewise strengthened. Centcr for Agriculture in the Environment AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST Attached is a copy of the Center for Agriculture in the Environment report on farmland preservation in the Town of Southold www.aftresearch.ora/PDRdatabase/NAPidx.htm Also attached are excerpts for the national parts of the report. P 61 AA L,MI 16C- Michaelis, Jessica s From: Benja Schwartz <eastcreek@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 3:04 PM MAR 2.7 2017 To: Michaelis, Jessica Subject: Ackermann file SoutholdTownSub J Planning Board Attachments: Email from a land use consultant.pdf, MEASURING SUCCESS Iq FKU I ECMG FARMLAND WITH EASEMENTS_A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT.pdf Please add the attached copy of an email I received from a land use consultant, and the attached excerpt from a report of the Center for Agriculture in the Environment, to the Planning Board file o n the Site Plan on development rights sold farmland of William Ackermann. Thank You 1} benj a eastcreek(2cgmail.com 631.734. 50 93 Gmail Hearing held open until end of business day March 24 Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:06 AM To: Benja Schwartz I agree that the proposed storage building for equipment to be used on properties other than the Alvahs Lane property, is prohibited by the covenant. Below are my comments, some of which are similar to the comments in your memos. Please call or email me if you have any questions. 1. Land Preservation, Ch 70-3 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION(formerly §25-30 ?) The production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock and livestock products, but not land or portions thereof used for processing or retail merchandising of such crops, livestock or livestock products_ Land used in agricultural production shall also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock barns, irrigation systems and any other structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes. The items in the second sentence are clearly not 'agricultural production' products, but are normal and customary accessory 'structures' permitted as incident to, or for the support of the primary use of 'agricultural production' on this property, and not other properties. The use of these structure in support of 'agricultural production' on other properties, whether for profit or not, would create a different use which is not permitted under the land development covenant. In this case, the storage and maintenance of equipment used in support of'agricultural production' on other lots would create a use not accessory to the permitted primary use of the subject lot. This would violate the covenant. 2. List of Equipment The task specific equipment proposed to be stored in the storage building is obviously excessive for the eight acre 'agricultural production' at this site, and is economically impractical. While the function of these machines may perform a task required for the 'agricultural production' at this site, based on the size of the operation, one or two tractors with accessories, together with hand labor, could easily accomplish the objectives. Why would this eight acre 'agricultural production' operation require: - 2 GMC 1 ton pickup trucks - 6 trailers - 8 Kubota tractors - an 8,162 sq ft equipment storage building The need for this amount of equipment is not plausible for the support of the primary use, and should not be permitted due to the restrictions of the covenant. Further, this amount of equipment combined with the fact that NFVS provides such services to other vineyards is proof that the equipment is for commercial purposes unrelated to the 'agricultural production' on the subject site. 3. Land Preservation Committee The Land Preservation Committee serves at the pleasure of the Town Board, and requires Town Board approval for the establishment of LP rules and regulations. Chapter 70 does not state which activity is appellate to the actions of the LPC. Ackermann claims in his Mar 16, 2017 letter that the Land Preservation Department approved the application, presumably, including the storage building. It is not known if the LPC established the equipment support levels needed for the eight acre `agricultural production' use. If Ackermann is correct regarding the LPC approval of the application, then that approval decision should be challenged if the required findings per §70-5 C.[3] are not documented in the LPC decision file. 70-5 C. Land Preservation Committee. The Committee shall perform the following duties: MTo review all matters relevant to development rights and the agricultural economy in general. MTo serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights have been acquired by the Town. MITo promulgate such rules and regulations as may be deemed necessary to govern the administration, procedures and duties of the Committee, which rules and regulations shall not become effective until approved by the Town Board. 4. Planning Board Dec 2, 2016 Referral to to ZBA Did the LPC issue a permit? Does the LPC have any Town Board approved rules and regulations to govern the administration, procedures and duties of the Committee? Which agency - the LPC, the Planning Board, the ZBA or the Town Board has original jurisdiction in this matter? And, which agency has appellate jurisdiction, such that any decision of the agency with original jurisdiction could be modified or reversed? No structure can be placed on DRS land unless a permit is issued with findings that such structure is part of the only permitted use of the premises. THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, permit, require or restrict the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production. Not for supporting the use of other premises for agricultural production. Town government is responsible for enforcing the development rights easement. Authority to alienate said rights is vested in the combined actions of the Town Board and the electors of the Town pursuant to §70-5 A. 1id; M A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS h, ,-ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 7. PROTECTION FOR THE LONG TERM: MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT Durability is the final test of effectiveness. Easements are supposed to provide enduring protection because of their perpetual character, as cemented in the legally enforceable language of these restrictions. Yet perpetuity is an open-ended concept that is impossible to predict. Certainly, the quarter century experience so far with the easement technique applied to agricultural land—and even the full century with conservation easements generally—is too brief a period to develop any certainty about the long term. The long-term effectiveness of agricultural easements is challenged by two types of problems. One is legal—the potential in the future for judicial or legislative actions that weaken the language and fact of perpetuity. Legal attacks on the viability of permanently-retired development rights are bound to increase in time as alternative uses become more attractive for some valuable parcels locked up by easements (Pidot, 2005). Just as serious are the economic and spatial threats to the agricultural purposes of easements, the fact that the legal restrictions by themselves cannot ensure that protected land will continue to be farmed and will not be compromised by land use developments around them (Sokolow, 2006). Too many extraneous factors affect the ongoing agricultural use of easement-covered farms—commodity markets, farming practices, landowner situations, nearby incompatible land uses, etc.—to allow easy predications. What is there, is the short history of agricultural easements to date to suggest how the promise of long-term agricultural preservation can be met? This section will address the question with three types of information: 1. What program managers and other interviewees said about the prospects of"lasting protection for farmland." While expressing a variety of qualifications, most were positive about this future scenario, according to the analysis of responses to the question. 2. What interviewees said about the current strengths and weaknesses of programs and suggested improvements. Besides more funding for acquisitions, interviewee suggestions include better strategic targeting of acquisitions, compatible zoning and planning, and farm-friendly policies. 3. And most critically, what programs are doing to improve the prospects for long-term preservation, especially easement monitoring and dealing with compliance problems. Perceptions about Lasting Protection In 2002 to 2003, interviewees were asked: Looking ahead to the future, what are the likely long-term effects of the program? Will it provide permanent protection for farmland? Interviewees representing 33 of the 46 sample programs responded "yes" to the second part of the question, agreeing that the easements in their areas will result in permanent protection for farmland. These were general responses for the most part, noting the perpetuity called for by easement language, with very few interviewees supporting their positive answers with specific evidence or examples. Instead, a number of respondents qualified their answers with contingencies. Permanent protection, they suggested, depended on such future conditions as the following: 51 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULI URAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS h, .PROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 • Sufficient funding for easement acquisitions (six responses) • Continuing public support and favorable political conditions (six responses) • The state of the overall agricultural economy, including markets for commodities, farm profitability, etc. (six responses) • The volume of agricultural acres to be added by the program (six responses) Respondents representing nine programs were more expressly negative about the agricultural benefits of their program, asserting that in the long term many easement-protected parcels were likely to revert to a general open space status instead of continuing as commodity-producing farmland. I think the impact will be minimal in preserving agriculture. In our county, it's more of an open space program than an agricultural program.... non-farmer buyers are out- competing farmers in purchasing this land. The long-term results of the program will be to create in some areas, and in some respects, a lot of 50-acre building lots. Which will still be farmed, but not by the landowner. –appraiser, Pennsylvania Perceptions About Program Strengths and Weaknesses Still looking for insights about the longevity of agricultural land preservation, we also asked interviewees in 2002 to 2003 to give their views of the strengths and weaknesses of the sample programs. Near the end of the phone interviews we first asked: Has this been an effective program? If so, why? What have been the key ingredients? If not, why not? Overwhelmingly, respondents agreed that their programs had been effective. Of 161 interviewees answering the question, only three answered with definite "no" while six others expressed some uncertainty. Both characteristics of the programs and external conditions were mentioned. By frequency of mention, the top ingredients of effectiveness, and, hence, program strengths were: • Good program staffing and leadership by the program board-27 mentions • Adequate funding-20 mentions • Good compensation to easement sellers-20 mentions • Support from the agricultural community-20 mentions • Community support-15 mentions • Local government participation-11 mentions Interviewees were also asked to identify program "weaknesses or limitations." About 70 persons responded to this question, pointing out a diverse set of factors, mostly relating to the funding, acquisitions and organization of easement programs. The most frequently cited weaknesses were: • Inadequate funding-15 mentions • Inflexible state and federal funding rules—seven mentions • Excessive length of time to complete transactions—five mentions • Problems in program's organization, staffing—four mentions • Inadequate monitoring, stewardship of easements—four mentions 52 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS h,r'ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 As suggested in this summary, few respondents took the long view—expressing ideas about the ongoing durability of the easements and the program actions needed to support their continued viability. Only one response about the ingredients of effectiveness referred to long-term protection. And only four interviewees who identified weaknesses worried about the inadequacy of monitoring or other stewardship work, including preparation for defending against possible legal assaults on the permanency and restrictions of easements. I think the biggest weakness is in monitoring the conservation easements and landowner relations. That's what I am trying to do now. I'm the first person to work on that specifically and the program has been going on for a lot longer than my position. –program manager, Colorado Stewardship: Program Monitoring, Compliance and Other Activities As land conservation professionals well understand, the work of easement programs does not end with the acquisition process and the completion of landowner transactions that legally remove development rights. Still remaining is the ongoing responsibility of ensuring that the easements remain intact—that the legal restrictions on property use agreed to by landowners are permanently followed. State and federal laws that recognize the legitimacy and tax benefits of the easement technique specify that the organization—public agency or nonprofit land trust— that holds an easement has the permanent obligation to protect the restrictions from violation. In the language of land conservation, this is the arena of "stewardship"—a broad category of conservation-oriented responsibilities (Byers and Ponte, 2005, 116). A central part of this post- acquisition process is checking up on how landowners use their easement-covered parcels through periodic inspection or monitoring. Ideally, monitoring involves the collection of detailed data about parcel characteristics and changes and is conducted in close collaboration with landowners, with the intention of preventing or correcting violations of easement terms (Byers and Ponte, 2005, 143-155). Monitoring. Virtually all the managers of our 46 sample agricultural easement programs recognized the importance of regularly monitoring the condition of acquired easements, but few claimed that they were able to do this adequately. In the phone interviews with program managers in 2002 to 2004, we inquired about monitoring details and compliance problems. Table 7 presents the information they provided. Among 30 respondents who responded to a question about frequency of monitoring, only 16 asserted that they or others inspected each or most of their easement properties on an annual basis—the standard usually specified by professional conservation groups. The other 14 reported biennial inspections, longer term or a less exact time period that we label as "infrequent." Several Maryland managers cited three- and/or 10-year intervals for inspecting individual parcels, the minimum standards imposed by two Maryland state funding sources. As described further below, it was not always clear what respondents meant by "monitoring" or "inspecting" properties because we did not inquire further about specific procedures. Even when annual checks of easements were reported, it was not certain that this affirmed a comprehensive site visit to each easement held—or instead involved a less complete review that relied primarily on office information or a quick drive-by view. Monitoring in most cases was carried out by the program staff who also handled acquisitions, landowner negotiations and other easement procedures. Usually this meant the program director, as Table 7 notes, the single staff person in most of the sample programs. The 53 I A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS IN r'ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 monitoring job in 10 programs with larger staffs was assigned to a designated specialist, often a staff member with full-time stewardship responsibilities. Several land trusts used volunteers, including board members, to inspect easement properties. Two programs contracted out the job to outside conservation specialists, including the Delaware state program that worked with local staff of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, a group already engaged in gathering data in field visits to individual farms. TABLE 7 EASEMENT MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS FOR SAMPLE PROGRAMS, 2002-2004 Program Monitoring Monitoring Compliance Problems Fre uenc Responsibility CA— Marin Annual Assigned staff Minor—overgrazing Agricultural Land Trust CA— Monterey Annual Program manager Minor—disruption of creek bed Conservancv CA— Napa Land Annual Assigned staff, Major (including litigation)/minor—not allowed Trust volunteers use (commercial vineyard), new owners not aware of restrictions CA— Sonoma Open Annual Assigned staff Minor—failure to submit road and other Space District improvement plans to program CA— Tri Valley Land NA NA Major/minor--expand building envelope Trust CA—Yolo Land Annual Board members— NA Trust volunteers CO — Boulder Infrequent Program manager Minor County CO — Gunnison NA NA NA Ranchland Legacy CO — Routt County/ NA NA NA Yampa Land Trust Connecticut State Infrequent in Program manager ; Major/minor—illegal subdivision, new owners reaction to and assistant not aware of restrictions, non-ag use (golf problems course Delaware State Biennial Contract with Major (including litigation)/minor—mobile National Ag home placement, etc. Statistics Service MD — Anne Arundel Infrequent Program manager No County MD — Baltimore Infrequent Program manager Minor—lack of updated conservation plans County MD— Calvert County NA NA No MD — Caroline 10 year Program manager Major/minor—improper use of family and County intervals worker residential lots MD — Carroll County 3 year or 10 Program manager No 54 1 � A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS IN HROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 Program Monitoring Monitoring Compliance Problems Frequency Res onsibilit year intervals MD— Frederick NA Program manager Major/minor—illegal residences, conservation County plans MD— Harford County NA Program manager Minor—conservation plans MD— Howard NA Program manager Major/minor—non-ag uses (landscaping and County septic hauling business), improper use of tenant lots MD— Montgomery Biennial Program manager Major/minor—debris, new owners not aware Count of restrictions MD— Washington 3 year or 10 Program manager NA Countv year intervals Massachusetts State Biennial Assigned staff and Major (including litigation) and minor—illegal contract inspectors residences, erosion, etc. MI — Peninsula NA Assigned staff— NA Township zoning administrator NJ — Burlington NA NA Major/minor—medical waste dumping, new County owners not aware of restrictions, fallow lands with species invasion NJ — Cumberland Annual Program manager No Count NJ — Hunterdon NA NA NA Count NJ — Monmouth Infrequent Program manager No Count NJ — Morris County Annual Program manager Major/ minor—accumulated junk vehicles, and assistant non-ag use (storage for landscaping business NJ — Sussex County NA Program manager Minor—new owners not aware of restrictions, farm worker housing NY — Town of NA NA NA Southold NY — Suffolk County NA NA NA NC— Forsyth County Annual Program manager NA PA—Adams County Annual Assigned staff Minor—accumulated junk vehicles PA— Berks County Annual Assigned staff—ag Minor—new owners not aware of restrictions conservation easement technician PA— Buckingham NA NA NA Township PA— Bucks County Infrequent Program manager Major/minor—non-ag use (mulch operation) PA— Chester County Annual NA Minor--best management conservation practices, non-ag uses (equestrian breeding), incomplete deed documents 55 1 1 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICUL.v,ZAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS 1­'ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 Program Monitoring Monitoring Compliance Problems Frequency Responsibility PA— Lancaster Annual Assigned staff— Minor—conservation plans, new owners not County preservation aware of restrictions, non-ag use (barn specialists, board storage) members PA— Lehigh County Annual Assigned staff, Minor—conservation plans program manage PA— York County Annual Assigned staff— Minor—trailer on land, conservation resource compliance conservationist Vermont State Annual Assigned staff— Major (potential litigation)/minor—removal of land trusts trees, etc. VA— Virginia Beach Infrequent Program manager Minor—drain fields on easement land City _ __ WA— King County 3 year Program manager Major/minor—illegal residences, new owners intervals I not aware of restrictions WA— San Juan NA NA NA County I WA— Skagit County Annual Program manager No WI — Dunn Township NA I NA NA Source: 2002 to 2004 interviews with program managers. Considering these arrangements, it is not surprising that monitoring activities in most programs did not receive the attention and resources that respondents said they deserved. Generally preoccupied with acquisition work, many program managers admitted that they did not have the time to thoroughly inspect easement properties on a regular basis. don't get out every year, it's just getting too hard. ...I don't have anybody here in the office except myself, and the list grows by 13 easements every year, so we're up to 81 now. And to do a really detailed monitor, like the state requires, probably takes two, three, or four hours. —program manager, Pennsylvania You know, I'm a one-person band with other responsibilities. And as we have more farms come under this program, each year it's going to be harder to make sure that the monitoring is done. To be honest with you, this past year I did not get to my monitoring within the time period that the state recommends. At this point there is a snow cover and I am not planning to do it on cross-country skis... So if I think that any part of the program in County needs to be strengthened, it's the monitoring process. — program manager, New Jersey Conducting a thorough site visit means a close inspection, usually in consultation with the landowner, that includes recording the conditions of farm improvements and resources on standard forms, noting changes in relation to baseline data and since previous inspections, supplemented with photos and maps. A short cut reported by some respondents is to perform a quicker inspection from a vehicle driving by the property. As noted in the quote below, monitoring efforts are also aided by information from other agencies, including building permit departments. Information about previously unknown improvements from such sources sometimes triggers extensive site visits; complaints from neighbors can also accomplish the same result. 56 1 � A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICUL,v RAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS liv rROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 1 do everything. I try to do site visits every three years. It's been difficult in the last couple of years to do that, primarily because we have had reductions in staff and the workload has increased. I have taken on other activities as well, but kind of refined our techniques a little bit also. The county's code enforcement staff and other agriculture program staff are somewhat familiar with the properties, and so they kind of keep an eye out and report back to me. And with the developments in aerial photography and GIS systems...we can pull this off the computer and get an overall sense of whether or not anything has been changed. –program manager, Washington A few program managers suggested that their familiarity with local properties and personal contacts in the community were an appropriate substitute for regular site visits. Every once in a while something will pop up, somebody will give me a call. I know all the farms here, walked every one of those farms, been here so long that I have done most of the easements. And half of the people I'm probably related to. So I'll call them up and politely say, "explain the problem" and see if they can clean it up. And they always do and we never have had to take somebody to court or anything like that. – program manager, Maryland Compliance Problems. Table 7 also lists the types of landowner compliance issues reported by program managers in 2002 to 2004. Non-compliance problems were identified for 28 programs. Most could be described as "minor" issues, the result of landowner misunderstandings or ignorance about the meaning of specific easement restrictions. The largest category of minor problems concerned the implementation of conservation plans, an easement requirement in some states. "Major" problems—usually concerning illegal structures, non-agricultural uses or persistent landowner neglect of corrective action—were identified by only 13 managers. Some of these issues concerned the construction or occupancy of single residential units, allowed in some easements for farm family members or farm workers, but apparently rented or sold to others for economic gain. I have a very high-profile case, where somebody is trying to build a 14,000 square foot house. He's calling it a tenant house. But it's got nine bathrooms in it. Come on now, it's not a tenant house! So I have to enforce that kind of stuff. --program manager, Maryland We have owner's and children's lots, and we have to make sure that...it is not going to be a lot that is for sale. We do what we can to get all the information to find out that, indeed, the owner or child is definitely going to live there... It's bad perception from the public on the program if they find out that we have allowed somebody else to build a house on preserved property. –program manager, Maryland Other compliance issues involve the definition of what constitutes an "agricultural use" of a preserved property, required in some easement deeds. got one with an illegal use, somebody's trying to run a septic hauling and landscape business on his property. So it's a question if it's allowed under the state easement. Landscaping is allowed under county easements, because we see it as a kind of green industry. I can agree with that, that a farmer should not be confined to traditional 57 i A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS IN -ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 farming...he should be able to go out and sell hay or straw to suburbanites. But septic hauling is just not appropriate, you know. –program manager, Maryland In only two of the issues listed in Table 7, did litigation occur in which a program sued landowners in court—an enforcement action of last resort. But there were other compliance problems that required programs to devote considerable resources to enforcement, including involving attorneys short of taking court action. Some at the time of our interviews had the potential of being turned into formal litigation. Out of the 150 farms that we have preserved so far, I only have one that perhaps needs legal action to get compliance... The landowner here has not been very cooperative with us in terms of implementing the conservation plan. We have some pretty major erosion issues on this property. When I did my inspection last year, I saw significant gullies, topsoil running out on the road, and so forth. We have been trying to work with that landowner to get better compliance, so far without much success. So next year, when it comes time to do the inspection, if they haven't taken the steps that we've asked them to take voluntarily, we will definitely take legal action to try to force compliance. Now we really bend over backwards to work with landowners, to just help them solve conservation problems, you know. But we can only go so far if a landowner isn't willing to work with us. –program manager, Pennsylvania We haven't had to litigate any problems yet, although some have come close... We had one that resulted in the sale of the farm... The guy wasn't farming any more. He bought out the actual farmer on the property—it was a brother-in-law situation. He took over the farm and was trying equestrian uses, but he really was into extracting precious metals from computer boards and he was accumulating masses and masses of what I call "debris." And we had to take enforcement action which resulted in the sale of the farm. –program manager, Maryland Quite likely the list of problems cited in Table 7 underestimates the true extent of compliance issues experienced so far by the sample programs. One reason is that not all program managers interviewed in 2002 to 2004 provided information in this area. Then too, the infrequency or incomplete character of many of the monitoring efforts suggests that a number of possible compliance problems were overlooked by programs. If not picked up by regular and detailed site visits, information about specific easement violations comes from less complete windshield surveys, building code departments, or citizen complaints—relatively random methods for gathering such data. Whatever the past pattern, it is highly probable that compliance problems will only accelerate in volume and kind in future years. A number of program managers made this easy prediction, identifying as one reason an enlarged exposure to problems resulting from expanded easement portfolios. Even more critical, some managers said, will be the results of changes in ownership of easement-covered parcels. While seen largely as a minor issue so far, amenable to landowner education and information, future changes will produce landowners even more distant in time and generation from the original easement transactions—certainly a major challenge for agricultural easement programs. It's certainly folklore among all the land trusts you talk to that compliance issues increase with later owners. You wouldn't imagine that the person who donated the easement would violate it, because they are the person who crafted those terms. And you would easily imagine that the second or third generation person would be more 58 1 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICUL i URAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS i.r'ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 likely to do something wrong. And so problems are going to get greater in the future. –program manager, California Generally, it's the subsequent easement owners you have the problems with, people who are not the original grantors of the easement. We're going to run into more of them, that's where your 'due diligence' and your inspection programs become very important. –program manager, Maryland Other Stewardship Activities. Besides regular monitoring and enforcement of easement restrictions, there are other stewardship tactics that programs can employ to enhance the viability of their easements. Foremost is maintaining close and supportive relationships with landowners and lessees who manage easement-covered farms. With the central purpose of helping to keep farms in productive agricultural use, landowner cooperation and assistance can take several different forms, including the following: • Identifying new purchasers of easement-covered properties and familiarizing them about the preservation purposes and details of the easement • Helping landowners to deal with specific resource protection issues on their farms • Conducting workshops and forums for landowners • Organizing value-added or economic development programs for local farmers, including farm tours and promotional efforts One program manager speculated about the benefits of having more time to work with his landowners: You know, if I had more time to spend with each farmer, I could get more information. In so doing, if I noted that a parcel seemed to be going fallow in a given year, or land that didn't appear as productive as it could be, I can put them in touch with our county ag agent. Or suggest that they work more closely with our Natural Resources Conservation Service. You know people that have more expertise perhaps than I do. –program manager, New Jersey Most of the sample programs are minimally engaged, if at all, in such activities. With insufficient resources devoted to monitoring and enforcement, they have even less to give to the lesser priority of maintaining ongoing landowner relations. Knowing something about their landowners in a systematic fashion would be a minimum step for programs interested in this area. But as we have seen in the Chapter 4 analysis of resale trends, few programs in our sample even keep track of changes in the ownership of properties included in their easement portfolios. To be sure, there are exceptions to this pattern of minimal stewardship—generally programs with larger staffs and relatively generous operational budgets. The Marin Agricultural Land Trust (MALT) in California, with four full-time and four part-time staff persons, is an example. The full-time stewardship coordinator prepares the baseline reports on new easement properties, conducts annual visits with participating landowners and inspections of their properties, and provides them with conservation and ranch management information through seminars and workshops. As another aspect of its ongoing contacts with landowners, MALT sponsors an annual dinner honoring its easement partners. Other staff members are assigned to related responsibilities, including educational activities, a quarterly newsletter distributed to community leaders, and organized farm visits and hikes on protected properties opened up by their owners. The latter work is motivated by MALT's recognition that it's conservation mission 59 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICUL i URAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS i.r'ROTECTING FARMLAND-REPORT 4 is greatly helped by the understanding and support of local agriculture by the broader non-farm community. 60 A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS IN PROTECTING FARMLAND REPORT 4 DECEMBER 2006 A JOINT PROJECT OF AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST AND AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER ALVIN D. SOKOLOW AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Publication supported by Farm Foundation s-fidElEk AL S 40L— American Farmland Trust SAVING THE LAND THAT SUSTAINS US http://www.aftresearch.org/research/publications/detaii.ph p?id=b939970 b7b60e9da l 38bcc9164f6ca41 A National View of Agriculture Easement Programs: Measuring Success in Protecting Farmland - Report 4 - AFT CAE: Research aftresearch.org ABSTRACT When do agricultural easements effectively preserve farmland from urban influences? This report answers the question by examining five different tests of effective farmland protection as applied to the experiences of 46 easement programs in 15 states. Here are the principal findings, organized according to the five tests: 1. Numerical Achievements. Judging by acres and farms preserved, the 46 programs have impressive accomplishments. But in relation to the preservation job in front of them, the results are mixed. Only a half dozen programs have come close to completing their acquisitions in relation to the total farm acres and farms in their jurisdictions and according to stated program goals. 2. Land Market Impacts. A strong indication of easement effectiveness is that protected parcels largely remain in farming, even for the many properties that are later purchased by non-farmers primarily for residential use—the single most important finding of this study. The reason, as suggested by data on parcel resales for a number of programs, is that the purchasers tend to lease their newly acquired land to active farmers for ease of management and tax reasons. 3. Local Agricultural Economies. It is far less clear that easements are effective in contributing to another important agricultural condition—healthy local support services such as farm supply outlets, tractor dealers and processing facilities. Such services continued their long decline in many communities with easement programs, because of more powerful economic forces, including changes from traditional agricultural to suburban customers. 4. Influencing Urban Growth. Easements effectively help to redirect or influence urban growth in about a half dozen of the communities served by sample programs, working largely in conjunction with local government planning policies, zoning and other land use regulations, and service delivery limitations. 5. Long-Term Preservation. Most sample programs are not prepared for the long-term job of protecting the continued viability of their holdings and preventing or responding to problems of noncompliance with easement restrictions. They have not put sufficient resources into stewardship activities, as seen in inconsistent and incomplete efforts to periodically monitor the conditions of easement properties. This report concludes with a set of predictions and prescriptions, several of them focused on the likely increase in easement compliance problems in the future. Easement programs should devote more resources to monitoring and other stewardship activities, including the designation of specialized staff in the area, better data on changes in parcel ownership and stronger efforts to work with new landowners of easement parcels. Page 1 of 1 Mar 22,2017 04:03:38PM MDT http://www.aftresearch.org/PDRdatabase/31.htm aftresearch.org New York-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town-wide program-Formed in 1984-researched by Terri Ptacek and Anita Zurbrugg OVERVIEW-Stretching 21 miles into Long Island Sound,Southold is the eastern-most township on the North Fork of Suffolk County.The shoreline landscape makes Southold an sought-after location for tourism and second homes.Almost a third of the community's 54 square miles are still in farmland,although continually pressured by development.Southold was the first Long Island town to form its own independent agricultural easement to supplement the local preservation efforts of the Suffolk County program established earlier.Voter approved bonds and a property transfer tax have funded the town's easement acquisitions.Combining town and county efforts and the work of nonprofit organizations,easements to date have protected about one-fourth of the township's 10,000 agricultural acres.Yet local leaders,recognizing that the pace of growth and farmland conversion is exceeding the rate of easement acquisitions,are looking for other farmland protection methods. EASEMENT ACTIVITY-1,360 acres in 69 parcels. Goals:The town has identified approximately 7,000 acres of farmland at risk of development. Other Easement Programs:Suffolk County's purchase of development rights(PDR)program,in existence since the mid 1970s,has acquired about 1,330 agricultural easement acres in the township.Nonprofit organizations such as The Peconic Land Trust and The Nature Conservancy have protected additional agricultural land through easements and fee simple acquisitions. Total Agricultural Easements in Town:Approximately 2,900 acres. FUNDING Acquisition Spending to Date:$11.5 million spent by the town. Revenues:A 2 percent property transfer tax,approved by voters in 1998,funds the Southold Community Preservation Fund which supports the preservation of farmland and open space.Earlier funds were provided by seven voter approved environmental bonds and by foundation contributions to leverage matching federal fund and state funds. GOVERNANCE-The program is overseen by a citizens'Land Preservation Committee of seven members appointed by the Town Board.Members of the Land Preservation Committee also serve as the members of the Community Preservation Fund Advisory Board. STAFF AND OPERATING BUDGET-The staff includes the full-time land preservation coordinator and two newly created part-time positions.The annual operations budget for the land preservation department is about$210,600.The town attorney and assistant attorney provide assistance on an as needed basis. ORIGINS-Faced by escalating land costs outpacing the rate of farmland protection through its easement program,in 1980 Suffolk County asked townships to help in the effort.The Town of Southold organized its own PDR program in 1984 and acquired the first easements in 1986 after voter approval of an initial bond act.Six more bond issues were approved in later years.A further step was taken when the Peconic Bay Region Community Preservation Act was passed by the state legislature in 1998, facilitating the creation of a town preservation fund for farmland and open space fueled solely by a 2 percent real estate transfer tax. ACQUISITION PROCESS AND STRATEGY-The Southold Town Board makes the final acquisition decisions,acting on the recommendations of the Land Preservation Committee.The process is focused on acquiring easements on specific properties identified in the Southold Community Preservation Project Plan,adopted in 1998.As part of a town land use and preservation inventory,every working farm is identified in the plan which qualifies it for application.Applications are funded in order of submission. Rating of Parcels:No quantitative or qualitative scoring. Other Criteria:The town is currently working on adopting specific strategies that include identifying critical farmland and reaching out to owners of vulnerable parcels. CONNECTIONS TO LOCAL PLANNING AND LAND USE POLICIES-The Town Board,the Land Preservation Committee and the Planning Board work closely with landowners to preserve farmland.Southold Town policies related to the easement program include the Community Preservation Project Plan-which maps farmland to be preserved-and a clustering and preservation requirement for new subdivisions.The Peconic Land Trust works closely with the town's Land Preservation Department to facilitate PDR acquisitions combined with limited(reduced-density)development and private conservation easements.Not satisfied with the achievements of town and county protection efforts so far,town leaders are looking at other preservation options.A moratorium on new development is currently(2003)in place,to allow time for the town board to consider the recommendations of a blue-ribbon commission charged with preserving the town's rural character.Proposals under consideration include conservation subdivisions and rural incentive districts permitting property tax reduction for farms. Zoning:Agricultural-conservation zoning contains some restrictions against wholesale conversion of contiguous areas of prime farmland to residential use.Clustering is required on lots of 10 or more acres,requiring 50 percent of land preserved from development. DEMOGRAPHICS 2000 Population:5,465 1990-2000 Population Change:+273 residents;+5 percent AGRICULTURAL LAND 10,232 acres:about 7,500 acres actively farmed-15 percent of farmland is fallow,average parcel size approximately 17 acres. Conversion to Urban Use:Southold lost 2,400 acres of farmland in the last 20 years.(Program data) OTHER AGRICULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS 1997 Market Value:Suffolk County-New York's leading producer of agricultural products-produces over$250 million annually.The own of Southold contains 22 percent of Suffolk County's agricultural land. Number of Farms:606(Suffolk County) Principal Commodities:Vegetables and vineyards,grain,potatoes,sod and nursery MAP NARRATIVE-EASEMENT GEOGRAPHY(PROGRAM MAP) The Town of Southold is long and narrow,approximately 54 square miles but stretching over 21 linear miles into Long Island Sound.Most of the urban development is concentrated around the hamlets and along the shoreline.Easements are distributed throughout the town among various other privately and county protected parcels,with some easements concentrated around the edge of development. Page 1 of 1 Mar 22,2017 12:37.29PM MDT y .� . � �~ \ /% <&r x t � . . $ k .. § ' ¥ t . k . § § ( - . f \ _ IN, ) 2 0,0: ! . / � nS,Jb� DIANE CROSSER Pg fi Vk4 ,t MT��C. 500 ALVAHS LANE D L (�, E u V CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631)478-1420 MAR 2 dscrosserwoman@optonline.net Sostihald Town March 18, 2017 Planning Board Ms. Leslie Kanes-Weisman, ZBA Chairperson and ZBA members Southold Town ZBA Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan,Ackerman, 1000-102-4-6.1 Dear Ms. Kanes-Weisman: Last week, I submitted two letters to the ZBA, and included copies of documents from the ZBA and Planning Dept.files. I chose to chronicle the facts of the situation at hand, as objective evidence of the applicant's intentions for the use of the Alvahs Lane Property(1350 Alvahs Lane). I provided copies of his written submissions, and direct quotations,taken from the Planning Board Hearings and ZBA hearing. The 'feelings' of neighbors, including myself, regarding this site plan are irrelevant to this matter. The essence of this issue is that the applicant,from the start of this process, has declared his intent to use the property as storage for his, "growing vineyard management company"...which, "requires a barn to store tractors, etc." When approval was not granted for this purpose, he quickly changed his stated intent, in an attempt to gain approval for his storage warehouse. In his March 16`h statement addressed to the ZBA,the applicant further illustrates the deceptive tactics utilized to gain approval for a non-conforming use of agricultural, preserved land. I was unable to attend the ZBA hearing on 3/16/17; 1 understand that this was a closed hearing, and that the board will continue to receive and review additional comments regarding this site plan for one more week. I am compelled to write again. In his March 16, 2017 statement to the ZBA,,the applicant states he is the owner of NFVS; the correct title of the applicant's company, however, is NFVS, LLC. "LLC is the abbreviation for a limited liability company", which is defined as, "a business structure that combines the features of a corporations and a partnership, specifically the tax benefits of partnerships and the liability protections of a corporations". (Legal Zoom).The email address of the applicant is, Bill@NFVS.Biz; his intent from the start of this process, has been to run a business on this property. In that statement,the applicant says, "it (the property) has 8 acres previously planted in vineyard,and about 15 acres in... pasture area." On October 3, 2016(Planning Board Hearing),the applicant states, "There's roughly 8 acres of vineyard,the rest of the parcel, its 22.8, is not conducive to putting a vineyard on.So it'll just be grass"."Then on November 4, 2016,the applicant states, "I own 23 acres, 9 acres in vines, 10 more to be planted in vines". NO DISCUSSION OF LIVESTOCK; NONE. Had livestock and a 'working farm' been the intent of the applicant, he would have declared such intention at the start of the application process, and at the Planning Board and ZBA hearings, not one year later, after the initial application was not approved for his storage facility. In the original site plan, 8/24/16,the applicant describes a proposed, "equipment barn." (Attachment A). In the March 16th statement, however,the applicant states, "The barn is intended to house NFVS equipment for use on Alvahs Lane, hay for livestock, livestock related supplies and livestock shelter."(Attachment A-2). At the October 3`d Planning Board hearing however, the applicant was asked about the use of the barn. He states, "It(the building) is where I am going to store tractors at." When asked by Ms. Lanza, "You are only using it to store tractors."The applicant responded, "That's it,there's nothing else that needs to be done there, tractors and implements. I would rather have implements stored inside the barn than rather outside the barn,that's one of the main reasons." NO MENTION OF LIVESTOCK; NONE.When questioned further, by Ms. Lanza, as to use of the dormers, ("The building has dormers, are you intending to add a second floor?"). The applicant replied, "No we have very light picking baskets and picking bins and things of that nature,and I just wanted to make use of some cubic space." (Attachment A-3). NO MENTION OF LIVESTOCK, NONE. Included with the March 16th statement, is a schematic, illustrating anticipated placement of equipment in the building. Please note that this is VASTLY different from the schematic submitted on 10/21/16. Attachment B).The 3/16/17 submission also calls for chemical storage,although the agent of the applicant stated chemicals will be ordered and used immediately, not stored. It should be noted that neither schematic indicated space allocated for"hay for the livestock, livestock related supplies and livestock shelter." NO MENTION OF LIVESTOCK, NONE.The applicant further states, "the concept now is to raise a small number of grass fed cattle". The concept in December, 2016,was to, "add sheep, pigs, and possibly cattle. IF we do move ahead with the livestock,we will need appropriate shelter for the animals." (email to Brian Cummings from Gwen Grookcock/agent of the applicant, 12/16/16), although no provision for shelter for any type of livestock has been indicated in any of the documentation,or space allocated for same in the schematics, submitted by the applicant; NO MENTION OF LIVESTOCK, NONE. January 12, 2017, (letter to ZBA by the applicant), "The barn... intended to house NFVS equipment, such as tractors, sprayers, mowers, and grape bins...it could also partially become a shelter for livestock, if sheep are included. " Fast forward to March 2, 2017,the agent of the applicant states, "we are pretty much settled on cows.We were going to do sheep for a little bit, but..." (sentence not finished). No pigs, no sheep.The agent of the applicant further states, "I'm reluctant in getting into livestock a little bit. I think it's a lot more work than Bill might think it is", (Attachment C), although the letter of 3/16/16, indicates, as above stated, "the concept right now is to raise a small number of grass- fed cattle for non-commercial use." The applicant further states, "When this barn proposal was first submitted,the livestock project was mentioned, but not discussed at length with the planning department.... Given the feedback from the Planning Department, it did not seem necessary to provide further justification for a barn on a farm." In March,2016,when the land was quickly cleared, I PERSONALLY placed calls to the Planning Department, Brian Cummings, Mr. Keiley,Town Attorney,and Southold Town Supervisor,Scott Russell; NO ONE, NO ONE,was aware of plans for the property. Mr. Cummings/Planning Dept. cited plans from the former owner(Belle River Properties, Inc.),for a small horse barn on the property; there were no other plans"floated" before the Planning Dept. at that time, as the applicant would like you to believe. NONE. There is no record of any discussion regarding a, "livestock project".There was no mention of a "livestock project" at the Planning Board Hearing October 3, 2016, nor in the applicant's November 4th follow up memo to the Planning Department.When approval was not given to move ahead with plans for storage facility construction,the applicant then invented a "livestock project".The details of said project have also changed since the December 16th e- mail to Brian Cummings/Planning Department,when M. Grooncock stated, "We are in talks...to add sheep, pigs, and possibly cattle, depending on what seems feasible. "The applicant has now put up fencing,to give the impression that this is indeed a working farm. A 7,142 sq.ft. barn, is a permanent structure, and must be viewed as such, not a multi-purpose storage facility, use of which is to be determined, based on the whims of the applicant,the"concept"of which changes on a monthly basis. The applicant continues. "It is important to understand that the equipment to be stored in the barn is all used on the Alvahs Lane 'farm',some of which is also used on the leased vineyards, as it is not feasible to have separate sets of equipment for leased property. Please note that equipment used on 'managed vineyards' is housed in rented barns on a separate parcel of land." At the March 2nd ZBA meeting, however,when Gwen Grooncock as was by ZBA Chairperson Weisman, ""Well where is the equipment now?" Ms. Grooncock(partner of the applicant) replied, "In begged and borrowed barns. (Attachment D). We have some stuff over at Lieb,stuff in Anderson's barn. It's literally been in a few places and pretty much the whole point of buying our own piece was to have out own barn and have our stuff centrally located in one place."There are NO"rented barns" as the applicant states,they are "begged and borrowed"." It should be noted that the applicant reports storage at Lieb Vineyard,the very location where the applicant states he, "leases land". Ms Grooncock continued, "The fact that this is a vineyard is just perfect, and quite frankly it never occurred to use that there would be a question...otherwise you know we could of easily bought one of the acreages like the other two acre piece nearby."The failure of the applicant to conduct due diligence prior to purchasing the property, and disregard for submitting proper paperwork to determine feasibility of his "concept" prior to purchase, is an error that should not be visited upon the neighbors of Alvahs Lane,Southold Town,or taxpayers. The applicant erroneously states,"The Land Preservation Committee reviewed the application and approved it." He also wrote, "APPROVED" on that March 7,2016 document.The jurisdiction of the Land Preservation Committee is to advise, and my understanding is that the Committee does not have the capacity to "approve".This was another attempt by the applicant to alter the file to gain acceptance of his plans. He also stated in his 8/24/16 application,that the site plan was, "an amendment to site plan previously approved by the Planning Department";that was also untrue;there was not approved site plan,as per documents I previously submitted to you. The ONLY information the Land Preservation Committee had at the time of the review was a statement by the applicant expressing his intent to build an agricultural barn,with no mention of industrial use for a management company, conducting business off premises. Without full disclosure,the Land Preservation Committee was hindered in the review, as the facts of the true usage had not been revealed. The applicant submitted a Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement form on 2/24/16. He then requested a building permit,totally bypassing the requirement for a site plan. The applicant now states that, "the largest client, Pindar Vineyards, is indeed hundreds of acres, but NFVS provides consulting services only.They have their own equipment.All this was stated very clearly and accurately on the original application, and a list of NFVS leased/managed locations was provided." In the original application, however,the applicant does not mention specific clients, and states, "NFVS is a growing vineyard management company, and requires a barn to STORE tractors, etc." "The proposed barn will provide support to existing(existing, not new) agriculture by providing storage for NFVS equipment-tractors, sprayers, etc. NFV manages 10-12 local vineyards totaling hundreds of acres." (Attachment E). In his November memo to the Planning Board, however,the applicant changes his language (and intent) by listing only six locations, and indicating"leasing of acres",which was never stated in his original application. It should also be noted that two of the locations listed,Anderson and Lieb are the very locations that Ms. Grooncock, (March 2nd ZBA hearing),were "borrowed barns"for equipment storage. Duck Walk was also omitted from the list,although mentioned as a client, by Ms. Grooncock in the March 2nd ZBA hearing. In the November 4 1 submission to the Planning Board,the applicant states, "I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive;the equipment rotates around in season,and sits in storage in the winter". Two curb cuts have been indicated on the site plan to facilitate "safe ingress and egress". The applicant paved one of the curb cuts two weeks ago, until a Stop Work Order was issued.The applicant has declared his intentions, "The equipment will be stored at Alvahs Lane REGARDLESS." Also on November 4, 2016, he applicant states, "The ongoing success of North Fork Viticultural Services... relies very strongly on equipment being in good working order...proper SHELTER will also prevent damage and deterioration to the equipment, which could cause unnecessary expense,and create a potential hardship"; (Attachment F). NFVS, LLC is a business,the success or demise of which is not the responsibility of neighbors,Southold Town or taxpayers. The Deed of Development Rights,defined in Chapter 25 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold, stipulates, "...right to prohibit or restrict use of the premises for any purpose other than its present state of use, agricultural production." Chapter 72,Article 72.2 of the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan, calls for"regulation of agricultural uses in Town of Southold is necessary to facilitate and encourage bona fide agricultural operations..." Miriam Webster defines bona fide as: "authentic, real,true, actual, without intention to deceive." An thorough examination of the documents of the Proposed Ackerman Site Plan, Tax Map 1000-102-4- 6.1,will reveal that there is nothing bona fide about the statements or documents provided by the applicant.The applicant declared his intentions from submission of the first site plan on 8/24/16- "Storage of NFVS equipment."At the Planning Board Hearings in October, 2016,and November 2016, the applicant had every opportunity to discuss his'other concepts'for the property; he did not. Instead, he continued to support the need for his equipment storage until he did not gain approval for his business storage facility. He then attempted to camouflage the appearance of his business to appear to be an appropriate use of preserved agricultural land. Discussion of indirect use leased land and the "concept of a livestock project"then followed,and were created out of a desperate attempt to disguise his intended business use. A governing board cannot be asked to make decision,with long lasting consequences, if the details of proposal are constantly changing to appear to be something they are not. This is industrial use purpose, not farming, not agricultural use, and certainly not what taxpayers intended in voting to use tax money for land preservation. Thank you again for your time. Pulte, 4� Diane Crosser cc: Donald Wilcenski,Chairman, Planning Dept Southold Town Board Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor Al Krupski,Jr., Suffolk County Legislator Richard Amper, Executive Director, Long Island Pine Barrens Society Gail Wickham, Esq. Richard Matthew, Esq. Location of action: -- Site acreage _ � 2 . $ a�Cr es Present land use: Present zoning classification: . _ -- - - -- - - if an a lication for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following 2. PP information shall be provided: Ltl RM C K A 1 (a) Name of applicant:_� - - _ (b) Mailing address: p'• (c) Telephone number:Area Code( )—(0 (d) Application number,if any: _ _ - - - -- -- require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Will the action be directly undertaken, Yes ❑ No Z If yes,which state or federal agency?_ - - - -- - - - C. evaluate the project to the following Policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best 1VIa turned fonent pcompletionthat will further each policy. pP require that the form be re incomplete answers will req D�VELOPEI] C0�4ST F(ILIGY policy1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of e, makes benelic al use of a coastt enhances al location,and preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, m e 2 for evaluation minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section Policies; Page criteria. No ❑ Not Applicabie ftp S-� - ---� � ������ �`L°r►rr�� � ct< '��� � ., -VA- � bsI►.r -- - U � Attach additional sheets if Polic Y 2. Protect and preserye historic and archaeologicaours of the'Town of Southold. See LWIZP Section III-Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria J Yes � '� No L L_'� Not Applicable 9_,�Jjw AAAI* AIX 1 RECEIVIED MAR 16 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: William C. Ackermann, Ower, North Fork Viticultural Services (NFVS) I, William C. Ackermann, am a longtime North Fork resident and grape-grower and owner of NFVS. I have an amended site plan application before the Southold Town Planning Board to build a 7,142 sq. foot agricultural equipment and livestock supply barn on my 23-acre farm located at 1350 Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000- 102-4-6.1). The land was purchased in February of 2016. The parcel is zoned AC, development rights sold (DRS) to Southold Town. It has 8 acres previously planted in vineyard and about 15 acres in NFVS refurbished pasture area and paddocks (see photos attached). NFVS is a grape growing/vineyard managementtvineyard consulting company with a number of clients on the North Fork. Some clients are managed by NFVS and utilize NFVS equipment; some clients are engage on a purely consulting basis and use their own equipment exclusively. NFVS also leases vineyards to grow and sell grapes. Currently, leased vineyards are equivalent to about 50 acres with additional leased vineyard acreage under consideration. Leased acreage is in addition to the 23 acres NFVS owns outright, 8 acres of which are currently vineyard; all fruit is sold to third parties. NFVS DOES NOT PRODUCE ANY WINE. NFVS has also begun to improve the Alvah's Lane farm for livestock; approximately 15 acres. Older and weaker wood fencing has been replaced with general livestock wood post and mesh wire fences. The north field and south field have been cleared of over- grown brush, disked, graded and planted in cover crop and pasture grass. Stands of small trees where retained and improved in the south block as natural shade areas for livestock (see attached photos). Water lines have been installed for vineyard and pasture irrigation, as well as livestock drinking water. Half the perimeter on the north and east side was already fenced in deer fencing; we have installed the remaining east and south sides with deer fence to protect the vineyard The barn is intended to house NFVS equipment for use on Alvah's Lane, hay for livestock, livestock related supplies and livestock shelter. The concept right now is to raise a small number of grass-fed cattle for non-commercial use. I have been in talks with local livestock growers and several breeders of heritage breed grass-fed cattle over the past two years. I have narrowed the livestock selection down to Red Devon or Belted Galloway grass fed breeds. aouthold Town Planning Board Page 128 October 3, 2016 Heather Lanza: You are only using it to store tractors? William Ackermann: That's it, there's nothing else that needs to be done there, tractors and implements. I would rather have implements stored inside the barn than rather unsightly outside of the barn, that's one of the main reasons. Heather Lanza: Is that the reason for the size of the building, the quantity? William Ackermann: I actually did a schematic, I can forward it to you if your need it, of a footprint to show where all the pieces would fit. I still don't have room for all the implements and things I want to keep under rooves so they are not damaged by weather and what have you. I'd prefer they weren't outside, just kind of randomly sitting around. Heather Lanza: That would be good to provide that to the Board. William Ackermann: Sure, okay. Heather Lanza: How about the two driveways? Normally we like to see one curb-cut, did you have a reason why you wanted the two driveways? William Ackermann: Just because the ease of just driving, all it is, is a u-shape, that's all. There are a lot of houses and other- I don't want to be coming in and out of there onto Alvahs Lane, backing out if you will, I'd rather turn in and make it a safer way to get in and out. If you're familiar with the property up on the north side there is a hill, and quite frankly people do come down there, not necessarily at the speed they should, and so I just felt that it was safer to have it on the flat area where everybody could see comings and goings, whether north or south. Heather Lanka: Okay. The building has dormers, are you intending to add a second floor? William Ackermann: No, we have very light, you're probably familiar with them, picking baskets and picking bins and things of that nature, and I just wanted to make use of some cubic space. Heather Lanza: So there is a second floor? Or not? William Ackerioann: It's a loft, it's just a loft above a barn. No access from outside. Heather Lanza: Is that in any of the materials we have? William Ackermann: Any of the materials, what do you mean? Heather Lanza: Like the drawings or anything, because I didn't notice that, but it could be that I aidn't notice that we had it. That there was going to be a loft? I see a floor- William Ackermann: I gave you the floor plan and the detailed drawings. I �.err�mro-:.ueoerq. �xrr .. b ti f 11xo1r Y1r10-lf llFCOtpryr >ra xr£ -- I ._ % lab. j 4 - a e=r l-xaxexc�l rirJ t- � e t 9JDDG W. L. L 9 axrP �+ prrx�wrr#y � � �gQg . R LL - rid.-I wxvw IL 7mrW010-t.gpyl,pr 7cxrP 7aeb tKNG_2.r"C.ayu:.e- 15.•8- .. N _ b I b i b b •xdv lr7t0♦InErbrbr 2rxrP %a LAMO+t &t 7rxrr.,, 9 i l G/C7BOO OIYy-Z YPlBP , 1{III � s I f - }--- - u.o.ly 1 .'. co Tractor M7040-1+ UPCO . r �Yg 26'x8'�, 10 V' r W Ir > t Sto thu m 6'lOOQ POO Q tZL X til m c � 3 m � I ' & 7 CL CD f2 1.92 ' Wer-1 Wxrfi ' � ,gyp m E 0 � so .la ..dJh a ,. m m LL O 7 4 IL bjuuu t 'yS t 'i m m March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting because we're trying to he wants to decide between Belted Galloways and Red Devin's. We're getting input on that. I'm reluctant in getting into livestock a little bit. I think it's a lot more work than Bill might think it is but we have good friends that are livestock growers out here who are helping to you know help us understand the process so I guess then the next question would be how many head of cattle can we foresee maybe and it's a two year cycle so over the next three or four, five years so say it's half a dozen. So then I guess we'd have to find out what equipment and supplies are would pertain to that and add that to just the eight acre vineyard and that would be the size of the barn so I think yea I mean absolutely. Maybe we can just go look at somebody else who's got a comparable sized farm and see what their barn looks like. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Again site specific. GWEN GROOCOCK : Yea site specific. I mean I can tell you a thousand square feet is probably way too small you know is seven too big probably. That would you know that would be ideal but it is also large for sure so somewhere in there. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : I guess what the question the probative question here is if on development rights sold land you were farming whether it's agricultural, whether it's viticulture or livestock it's still farming according to our code what's the equipment and the scale you would need? I don't think the real question is about farming the subject property the question is using that scale and number of pieces of equipment elsewhere throughout the town on development rights sold property housing it there. So, that's kind of I think the essence of the question that the Planning Board has put before us whether we like it or not we have to grapple with it so is there anything else that's what I'm going to propose actually Ken and Gerry that we adjourn this to the Special Meeting. There's a lot of things that have been submitted to us in writing. We also I want to have a complete printout we have to give it to our transcriber. I want to be able to review the Planning Board's public hearing transcripts and our own and I think you should have an opportunity to see what's been submitted in writing in case you and Mr. Ackermann would like to respond in writing to any of them or that you would like to provide additional testimony. By adjourning to the Special Meeting in two weeks we all have some time to take a deep breath, look at everything and see where we need to go with this. If at the time we have no further questions or we have no further request from anyone we'll probably close it and then we will have from that point sixty two days in which to make a determination. We generally don't take that long you know but this is complicated and it has potential precedent setting you know component to it so we want to be extremely cautious and careful and thorough and open minded so we need to digest a lot of stuff. Yes please go ahead. GWEN GROOCOCK : I just want to say on that precedent setting aspect from looking at it it's quite it could cut both ways really. Setting a precedent that this is not agriculture could be very 27 I1 L.4.Ll v k.� LIAR 16 .2097 10-\ID ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL.$ When this barn proposal was first submitted, the livestock project was mentioned, but not discussed at length with the planning department, because the Alvah's Lane property had just been bought and plans were not firm at that time. Given the feedback NFVS got from the Planning Department, it did not seem necessary to provide further justification for a barn on a farm. However, the livestock fencing was installed in the early summer of 2016, and the grading, disking, seeding, irrigation lines and mowing done in the summer and fall, with equipment designed to be used on the Alvah's Lane farm, long before the Planning Board's public hearing in November. It is important to understand that the equipment to be stored in the barn is ALL used on the Alvah's Lane farm, some of which is also used on the leased vineyards, as it is not feasible to have separate sets of equipment for leased property. Please note that equipment used on "managed vineyards" is housed in rented barns on a separate parcel of land. Running a farm or vineyard of any size requires the same equipment; more acreage simply means more time spent working. NFVS is a relatively small company compared with much larger farming operations in the area. The operations of the Alvah's Lane farm and NFVS leased vineyards depend on well maintained equipment in good working order. A barn is essential to the protection of agricultural equipment. I have attached schematic showing equipment in a winter storage configuration; this schematic has also been provided to the planning department. Please be advised there are NO plans for retail, manufacturing, or anything that is not allowed on development rights sold land, according to Southold's own code. PRIOR ACTIONS: The Land Preservation Department reviewed the application and approved it. This department exists in part to ensure that development rights sold land is used appropriately. Planning department staff at first said that the application seemed straightforward. However, at the public hearing, some non-farming neighbors protested the barn, saying it was not in keeping with their neighborhood. They compared it to an "industrial site"; this is farthest from reality as the attached photos show the agricultural land has been improved for the sole purpose of"FARMING". NFVS pointed out that there is nothing in the Southold Town code that limits, determines or uses a formula to dictate the size of a barn on DRS land, nor the amount of equipment a farmer of DRS land may own. The DRS deed for 1350 Alvah's Lane references the Southold Town Code which states that development rights sold property is limited to agricultural use, INCLUDING storage of agricultural equipment. March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting GWEN GROOCOCK : Yea pretty much again like a major spray is something that happens maybe four times in the season or five times. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Yea if it rains or whatever the case might be. GWEN GROOCOCK : So if you have the sprayer moving around and if it takes a week to,get everywhere then that's what it does and then MEMBER GOEHRINGER : So it never comes off the trailer except when you're leaving them the project. GWEN GROOCOCK : Exactly and often it stays where it's got to it stays where it is to finish the next day or whatever. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Well the question is where is that equipment kept now? GWEN GROOCOCK : In begged and borrowed barns. We have some stuff over at Lieb, stuff in Anderson's barn. It's literally it's been in a few places and pretty much the whole point of buying our own piece was to have our own barn and have our stuff centrally in one place. The fact that this is a vineyard is just perfect and quite frankly it never occurred to us that there would be a question that this is true agriculture otherwise you know we could of easily bought one of the acreages like the two acre piece nearby or whatever and put the barn there cause they're all AG zoned but not development rights sold so there's a number of parcels in that area that could we could of bought instead to put a barn on it if we realized that there's going to be a question as to whether what we're doing is true agriculture or not. We certainly didn't expect this so CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well let me try and clarify and then I think Ken had some questions he wanted to ask. What we're trying to ascertain here is, the activities that you're engaged in are all farming activities that's not the question really. The question is is this proposed barn and the equipment proposed to be stored within and intensification of use on development rights sold property which generally permits this kind of use to farm the subject property. When you go off to farm other properties using that equipment where's the line between what becomes a business a kind of commercial services farming services business and your right to farm as a farmer on your property. We know there's a history of people sharing equipment and loaning equipment and so on. You know I think in fairness there was a lot of testimony that happened before you arrived. You came very late to the hearing and GWEN GROOCOCK : I'm sure I've heard it before. Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 fo'r evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No MNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound,the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No Ei Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. 9Yes ❑ No« Not Applicable Al - —W qk -pra f c—S pl c` EV vts nares Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No [J Not Applicable PREPARED BY ! -�' .i,r TITLE C Ilf/� DAT Amended on 8/J/05 y � do CJ l/1C J �r VOW Nov.4,2016 NOV €) 4 200 U Planning Board Office Town of Southold SOU14 10 Town Re: Request for Information,Ackermann Agricultural Barn,Alvah's Lane Vineyard. Planning Board I am in receipt of your letter dated Nov. 1,which arrived after I submitted information for the file on Nov.3,so please add this to the file also. North Fork Viticultural Services owns, leases and manages a number of vineyards.I grow and sell fruit from my own vineyard,plus grow and sell fruit from leased blocks at other vineyards,and manage/consult for non-leased areas of other vineyards. • Alvah's Lane Vineyard, 1350 Alvah's Lane —I own 23 acres;9 acres in vines, 10 more acres to be planted in vines. • Clovis Point Vineyard, 1935 Main Road, Laurel—lease 1 acre, manage 6 acres. • Jason's Vineyard, 1785 Main Road,Laurel—lease 11 acres. • Anderson (Onabay)Vineyard,1600 South Harbor Lane,Southold—lease and manage 20 acres (ratio between lease/manage varies by harvest,according to what fruit Onabay keeps for its own wine,and what fruit I sell.) • Hounds Tree Estate,2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck—lease and manage 27 acres,varies as above. • Pindar Vineyards,37645 Peconic—consulting manager for 223 acres,lease varies as above. Pindar Vineyards uses its own equipment; I oversee and direct the vineyard management program. • Lieb Vineyards, 13050 Oregon Road, Cutchogue—consulting manager plus seasonal spraying services for 90 acres. To summarize,the proposed barn is to store equipment that is used to manage my own Alvah's Lane vineyard, plus vineyards that I lease/manage. I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive;the equipment rotates around in season,and sits in storage in the winter.ALL of the equipment is also used on site to manage my own vines and property. The equipment will be stored at Alvah's Lane regardless,as I have purchased the property to be a working farm,not as a public service to provide scenery for the neighbors. Equipment in a storage barn will be far more attractive than equipment stored outside or under a large,plastic,round truss-type temporary shelter. Proper shelter will also prevent damage and deterioration to the equipment,which could cause unnecessary expense and create a potential hardship.The ongoing success of North Fork Viticultural Services and Alvah's Lane Vineyard relies very strongly on the equipment being in good working order.A working farm needs a barn. Under section 100-220 of the Southold Town Code,our farm practices are protected from Interference by adjacent owners.It also declares agriculture to be desirable,and supported by Southold Town. Denying a barn to shelter essential equipment that is used on-site would be in direct conflict with this. Furthermore,the Land Preservation Committee,which deliberates on appropriate uses for preserved land, has already assessed our proposal and approved in writing the basic principle of having a good- sized storage barn on this site.Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code explicitly states that land In agricultural production shall include equipment storage buildings, and there is nothing In the law about development rights sold land that prohibits a storage barn.(see attached from Land Preservation mittee). Regards, ' RECEIVI U William A n,NFVS, LLC. 3s ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DIANE CROSSER ()(�i H L�U { 1 ODC 500 ALVAHS LANE,CUTCHOGUE ECINVEO� NEW YORK, 11935 (631)478-1420 MAR 13 2017 dscrosserwoman@optonline.net Soulhoftf Town March 8, 2017 Planning Board Ms. Leslie Kanes-Weisman, ZBA Chairperson, Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan,Ackerman 1000-102-4-6.1 Dear Ms.Weisman and ZBA Board members: I have enclosed both a letter and supporting documents in opposition to the above referenced site plan. I have also included copies of documents from the original file, housed in the ZBA office, substantiating the reasons for this opposition. It should be noted that in February,2016,the applicant had originally requested an agricultural structure placement for a 3200 sq ft. barn;3200 sq ft. Had that barn been built for agricultural use to maintain the eight acres of grapes,and perhaps livestock,there probably would have been little opposition.The applicant(in his own words),stated that he needed a storage facility for his,"growing vineyard management company",to"manage 10-12 local vineyards totally hundreds of acres" on preserved farmland.There was no mention of livestock in his site plan, no mention of livestock in the Planning Board Hearing, 10/3/16, and no mention of livestock in his November 4`h letter to the Planning Department.When the plans of the applicant did not gain approval to construct his storage facility,the livestock program was conceived; the details of same, however, have changed over the past several months, and there are no concrete plans for same at this time.A Board cannot render a just and proper decision based on the 'dreams' of an applicant,which in this case, keep morphing into something else.The intent of the applicant was stated from day one-to build a warehouse to store his equipment for his, "growing management company",which, "manages 10-12 local vineyards totaling hundreds of acres." He has declared on two occasions that he intends to build regardless of whether or not he obtains approval to do so. Any additional ideas for a 'working farm'are merely a desperate attempt by the applicant to push forth his storage facility for his for profit business, the location of which is on preserved land, paid for by taxpayers. If the 'working farm' and 'livestock' projects were truly part of his plans,such would have been disclosed at the time of the application, and in the subsequent months;they were not. On two occasions,the applicant has stated that he will build his 'barn'when the plans are approved or not. "The equipment will be stored at Alvahs Lane regardless,as I have purchased the property to be a working farm, not as a public service to provide scenery for the neighbors". On March 3`d,the applicant began preparing the first curb cut; and a 'stop work order'was issued by the Planning Dept. I hope that you will take the time to carefully review the enclosed information; as the documents are riddled with contradictions and inaccuracies. If you have any questions, I can be reached by e-mail or by phone. Thank you for your time. Diane Crosser f" Cc: Planning Dept, c/o Donald Wilcenski, Chairperson Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Town Supervisor Al Krupski Richard Amper, Pine Barrens Society Gail Wickham, Esq. Richard Matthew, Esq. DIA SSER 500 AIVAHSOLANE U CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631)478-1240 (cell) MAR 13 2017 dscrosserwoman@optonline.ne Southold Twin Planning Board March 8, 2017 Ms. Leslie Kanes-Weisman, ZBA Chairperson and ZBA Board Members Southold Town ZBA Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan, Ackerman 1000-102-4-6.1 Dear Ms. Kanes-Weisman and ZBA Board members: As you review the file of the above proposed site plan, I would ask that you consider the following: Two attorneys,with decades of experience in general,zoning, real estate and town law voiced opposition to this site plan at the ZBA hearing on Thursday, 3/2/17. Both Gail Wickham and Richard Matthew offered legal expertise opposing use of preserved,agriculturally zoned land, (the preservation rights of which were paid for by taxpayers)for industrial/business use. (copies of the statements and letter enclosed).The Ackerman site plan is also opposed by Richard Amper, Executive Director, Long Island Pine Barrens Society(who successfully who filed a lawsuit to make certain, " millions of dollars paid for by taxpayers to keep farmland in used solely for DIRECT 'agricultural production'. The State Supreme Court threw out laws passed in 2010 and 2013 that allowed farmers to get special use permits and hardships exemptions to build structures such as .... barns.. ..on land where the public had bought out farmers' rights to build anything". (Newsday, October 8, 2016). William C. Ackerman,Sole Member, North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC, purchased the property at 1350 Alvahs Lane (Tax map 102-04-6.1), from Belle River LLC on 2/4/17. Mr Ackerman (subsequently referred to as "applicant"), submitted a Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement, on 2/24/16. He listed an, "Ag Barn", approx. 80'x 40' (3200 sq feet), and an "Ag Pump House" 20'x 15' (300 sq ft). "See survey"was noted in parenthesis.The survey contained a hand written sketch of the plan. In blue ink,the Ag barn size is crossed off, and replaced with "L" shape 95'x 41' (3895 sq ft)+40'x 40' (1600 sq ft).There is no date, and no initials as to who made the change. (Attachment A). The applicant quickly began clearing the land,trespassing of property of adjacent neighbors, (photos and video of same are in the planning file). I placed calls to Brian Cummings, Planning Dept., Mr. Kieley, office of the Southold Town Attorney,as well as Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor. I also spoke with adjacent neighbors; no one had any knowledge of the intended plans for the property. On 6/7/16,the Planning Dept. (Brian Cummings) indicated on the Site Plan Use Determination (submitted on 5/25/16),that a site plan was required (Attachment B).The Building Dept. denied issuance of a building permit(application submitted on 5/2/16),to, "construct an agricultural building". (Attachment C, C-1). On March 7, 2016,the Department of Land Preservation deemed that, "agricultural uses are consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement."At the time of that review,the Land Preservation Committee had no knowledge that the intended use of the building was for business storage, or that only 8 of the 23 acres were in use. The March 7th letter also states,the Committee's approval of this use within the easement does not mean that such use or buildings will be approved or permitted by other departments or agencies." Please note that there are three versions of this letter in the applicant's file.The first is a copy of the original,faxed to me by Mesissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator,also included a sketch with handwritten notes from the applicant. (Attachment D-1). A second copy has hand written notes on the left margin, (Attachment D-2);the notes are neither dated nor initialed. (Attachment D-2). The third copy in the file has the word, "Approved", written by the applicant, in the upper left corner. (Attachment D-3). My understanding is that the role of the Land Preservation Committee is to review and advise, not 'approve'or'disapprove'. On June 7, 2016, the town returned a check to the applicant, noting disapproval of the application, again citing the need for a site plan, and approval from the Planning Dept. Over two months later, on August 24,2016,the applicant filed an "Ackerman Property Amended Site Plan" (Attachment E), although there was no previous plan submitted, as noted on the June 7th returned check.The Site Plan from Belle River properties (March, 2015)expired. (Attachment E-2). On 8/24/16,the applicant stated, "This is an amendment to the Site Plan previously approved by the Southold Town Planning Dept. (Attachment F-1).This STATEMENT IS NOT TRUE; there was NO Site Plan submitted OR approved by the Planning Dept. Under Policy 12,the applicant states, "The proposed barn will provide storage for NFVS equipment-tractors, sprayers,etc. NFVS manages 10-12 local vineyards totaling hundreds of acres." (Attachment F-2). Under the Developed Coast Policy,the applicant states, "North Fork Viticultural Services is a growing vineyard management company and requires a barn to store tractors, etc. ." On September 12,2016, in a Site Plan Application Work Session, it was noted that Proposed, was a, "7142 sq ft. equipment storage and warehouse building". A note to staff states, "language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building." I question who has the authority to change the "language" of an application. Additionally the notes clearly state, "the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses ON SITE,and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing." (Attachment G). A public hearing before the Planning Dept. was held on October 3, 2016. Neighbors voiced opposition to the project, and signed petitions objecting to industrial use on preserved agricultural land. When questions were posed about the Alvahs Lane use,the applicant stated, "There's roughly 8 acres of vineyard,the rest of the parcel, it's 22.8 is not conducive to putting a vineyard on.So it'll just be grass." When asked the purpose of the building, and if he intended to run the business out of the building,the applicant only responds, "It's where I am going to store the tractors at." Questioned as to whether that was the only use,the applicant replied, "That's it,tractors and implements." The applicant is further questioned on the size of the building, if only eight acres are in use. He responds that he can provide a schematic.That information was received by the Planning Dept.on 10/21/16, and illustrates use of the 'barn' as a warehouse for equipment, including but not limited to: two trailers, Kubota tractors, heavy duty pick up trucks, loaders, mowers and sprayers, and heavy machinery in excess of, "implements" needed for management of 8 acres. (Attachments 1-11-4). At the same hearing,the applicant was also questioned as to the need for two driveways. He replied it was for ease of use, "I'd rather turn in and make it a safer way to get in and out". In the 8/24/16 application, the applicant also cited need to, "create safe access for tractors from Alvahs Lane." (Attachments I-1-3). On November 4, 2016,the applicant issued a letter to the Planning Board (Attachment J), indicating that, "...the equipment is moved around to the different sites as needed. We do not own a full set of equipment for each site—This equipment represents a large investment for the COMPANY, and cannot be left outside.....the selected location is level with open visibility up and down Alvahs Lane,to facilitate safe ingress and egress." If the equipment was truly only needed for the Alvahs Lane property,two curb cuts, safety of tractors, and safe ingress and egress would not have been pertinent to this site plan. On October 7, 2016,the Planning Board requested information from the applicant, as to floor plan, drawings of the second floor, a list of chemicals/pesticides proposed to be stored in the building, and the number of trips per day/week for the, "proposed business and deliveries of supplies."(Attachment K). A schematic, illustrating equipment storage (please see Attachment H3-4)was provided on 10/26, as stated above. As per my review of this site plan at the ZBA office, on 3/8/17, missing was the list of chemicals/herbicides/pesticides, as well as the number of truck trips.The applicant stated in his November 3rd letter,that, "NFVS chemicals, such as pesticides are delivered roughly every ten days in summer,....and used immediately" (please see Attachment J).The question of herbicides was ignored, although the applicant indicates two, 8x6' herbicide locations in his schematic(please see Attachment H-4). The surrounding neighbors are have well water, and are most concerned about contamination of the water supply. On November 1, 2016,the Planning Board requested a list of all vineyard currently managed by NFVS. In a letter dated November 4, 2016,the applicant listed six vineyards that he manages or for whom he consults,contrary to his 8/24/16 site application where he stated he manages 10-12 vineyards.At the ZBA hearing on 3/2/17, Gwen Groocock, who identified herself as the partner of the applicant, only mentioned 'a few'vineyards, but then also included Duck Walk, which was not listed on the November 4th list.That leads one to the following serious question, as the applicant has been most disingenuous since his purchase of the property: What is the total number of the NFVC business contracts.At the March 2"d ZBA hearing, when asked the annual income of the business,the agent of the applicant declined to answer. The Planning Board asked for a complete list of contracts; not only a list of vineyards which required the use of NFVC equipment. (Attachments 1-1-2).The applicant also states 10 more acres will be planted on Alvahs Lane, despite the fact,that on October 3, 2017, he stated,that the remainder of the Alvahs Lane property is, "not conducive to putting a vineyard on. So it will just be grass." (Attachment N). He submitted that the height of the proposed storage facility would be 14',then submitted a sketch illustrating a height of 26+'. As the Planning Dept. continued to deliberate on the merits of this site plan for a commercial warehouse,the applicant sent a letter to the Planning Dept. on 12/16/16,to the attention of Brian Cummings,and Melissa Spiro, and suggested that, "We (Ackerman) are in talks to add sheep, pigs and possible cattle, depending on what seems feasible. (Attachment M#1). When we do move ahead with the livestock,we will also need appropriate shelter for the animals... and deciding which livestock and how many to start with" (Attachment M#2).The applicant is suggesting that the barn will be shelter for the livestock, but is still deciding "which" livestock. Additionally, as per the applicant's schematic(please see Attachment H-3 )The agent of the applicant then demands, "please amend this (Planning Dept. letter to the ZBA)ASAP, and let me know immediately when it has been done." (Attachment M3). For eleven months,throughout every aspect, and every document,the applicant NEVER mentioned livestock, until approval to construct an industrial warehouse was not forthcoming. Correspondence,from the applicant, received by the Zoning Board of Appeals on 1/12/17, again changed the intent of the site plan. The applicant stated,the barn...is intended to house NFVS equipment.... as well as supplies for the livestock project." It could also partially become shelter for livestock, if sheep are included.The concept right now it to raise a small number of sheep and cattle for non-commercial use at first to assess the feasibility of raising livestock commercially" (Attachment 0). There is no area on the schematic (please see Attachment H-3) dedicated to livestock supplies or livestock. That is not an assigned agricultural use- it is an experiment on 'feasibility experiment',the expense of which should not be shouldered by taxpayer money. On March 2, 2017, Gwen Grooncock, acting as a spokesperson for the applicant, stated, "As far as pasture land and everything else we are in fact wanting to put in cattle. That's going to where we're not entirely sure yet how much room that's going to take in some form of a barn, but that is part of that parcel.....There's not any kind of intensive use going on there on a day to day basis. It's literally storage." If there was no "intensive use",there would be no need for two curb cuts outs for easy ingress and egress. If it is, "literally storage" such a storage warehouse is not a permitted use of preserved agricultural land.The applicant himself has stated that equipment in a "storage barn"will be more attractive than equipment stored outside..(letter to the Planning Board, 11/4/16). Storage, as per the Land Preservation Committee is prohibited. (Attachment P-( page 20-ZBA march 2, 2017, Regular Meeting minutes). At the same meeting,the agent of the applicant,when asked what percentage is actively engaged in farming. Ms. Grooncock stated, "..eight acres of grapes,.. We've planted pasture grass and are pretty much settled on cows. We were going to do sheep,for a little bit, but that's", (sentence not finished). Chairperson Weisman replied that, "Well certainly you wouldn't need that amount of equipment for viticulture for eight acres, if you were just doing your own eight acres particularly since the rest of the acreage is now being proposed for cattle which would require a different kind of situation so then most of that equipment is going to be used on other property....". (Attachment Q). Ms. Grooncock then continued, "I'm reluctant in getting into livestock a little bit. I think it's a lot more work than Bill might think it is..."I guess the next question would be how many head of cattle can we foresee maybe and it's a two year cycle so over the next three or four,five years so say it's half a dozen. So then I guess we'd have to find out what equipment and supplies would pertain to that and add that to just the eight acre vineyard and that would be the size of the barn... (Attachment R). With that statement,the agent of the applicant acknowledges that a 7142 sq ft storage facility is not needed for the designated use of the property. Later in the meeting,the Chairperson inquired if repair of equipment would be performed in the "proposed storage building". Ms. Grooncock replied that, "no major repairs like welding or if the engine breaks", which means other machine/tractor/truck repair would be performed on the premises, resulting garage use. (Attachment S). The applicant has stated that having separate pieces of equipment for each site he manages would be prohibitively expensive. He states that lack of proper shelter will cause damage and deterioration to the equipment could cause, "unnecessary expense and create a potential hardship. "The ongoing success of NFVS ...relies very strongly on the equipment being in good working order". (November 4, 2016). He stated (January 12, 2017)that, "The operations of NFVC and the livestock program depend on proper storage of the equipment and supplies.That is why it wants a barn."There are no pigs, sheep have been eliminated and now, "I'm reluctant in getting into livestock... it's a lot more work than Bill might think", and "we have not reached the stage of buying any cattle yet...I guess we'd have to find out what equipment and supplies are" (please see Attachment R);there is no 'livestock program'. The agent of the applicant has stated that he would not have bought the property if development rights were intact. Preserved farmland sells for less than $24,000/acre; unpreserved land on Alvahs Lane sells for$165,000/acre. Preserved land represents quite a bargain for the buyer, especially if the buyer can convince a Planning Board,Zoning Board,and the tax payers of Southold Town that his interest is in farming, not housing his for-profit management company. "Someone buying in an agricultural district, it's buyer beware. Realtors should have a piece of paper saying, 'If you are thinking of buying in an agricultural area,this is what it entails"'. (Paulette Satur, New York Times, November 26, 2007). Similarly, if you are an LLC(Limited Liability Company), (Attachment T), reaping tax benefits of partnerships, and liability protection of a corporation,on preserved farmland, zoned for agriculture,you should know what it entails.That does not include the building of a 7142 sq ft warehouse to house a business operation. We strongly request that you deny this application, based on all of the information provided. Thank you for your time. LkL-� &Vl�_ Diane Crosser March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting indicated let me see if I can just find it well I could tell you what it sags Set- = •.ou can find it exactly but basically it says that based upon the covenants and restriic - --at are in the development rights contract that the town holds with this subject proms. a- agricultural storage building is a permitted use and that's about all they said so they ,: to be an agricultural building which is permitted on DRS development rights sold propel . mitt`s see oh here's the letter this letter is dated March 7, 2016 this is to Mr. Ackermann Tom the Department of Land Preservation and it says it goes over the materials that were presented to Land Preservation Committee and let's see go to the conclusion Land Preservation Committee members concluded that their review and found that the agricultural use as described above shown as located within the L-shaped barn building and the pump house are agriculturally use is consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement. That in a nut shell is what I think the most important part of that letter. Let's see I may have some questions of Mr. Ackermann is he here? Is someone here representing Mr. Ackermann? No okay then I guess we're not going to be able to question him alright then let's see there are clearly people in the audience for this application so why don't I say who would like to address this application now? ABIGAIL WICKHAM : Good afternoon, Abigail Wickham of Cutchogue. I'm here I hadn't planned to speak because I have very limited amount on time and I expected a rather protracted meeting. I do have a letter with multiple copies that I would like to submit to the Board if I could perhaps since we do have the time just go through it very quickly. I am an advocate of farming and the development rights program but I'm concerned that this project doesn't fit within that program. In addition to my general interest in the case I do own property in the vicinity of the property. First question I have is one of jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The deed of development rights affecting this property quotes verbatim chapter XXV of the town code when it defines the development rights which required by the town and therefore an interpretation of this code provision is arguably the basis of the ZBA's jurisdiction. However I have questions that I think the Board might want to look at before they go further with any decision because as the matter concerns a development rights granted to the town should have perhaps be a Town Board matter perhaps with the aid of an opinion of town council in deciding this question. One could also argue that the Building Inspector is the one with authority as it is a usage question. It appears the Building Inspector and the application wasn't really given very much information about the details of where and how the equipment was to be stored and what it was to be used for. Therefore it may be that the matter should be sent back to the Building Inspector with the facts which have now been elicited at the Planning Board public hearing on the site plan as to whether the Notice of Disapproval should be amended. If the Notice of Disapproval is amended any party feeling aggrieved by that could come back to you the ZBA or perhaps the Town Board directly. So it's a really I think a thorny March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting jurisdictional issue which you will have to address and adding to that which is not in my letter but given what you just referred to about the Land Preservation Committee I don't know how much information they were given in making their report to you. It merely talks about an agricultural storage building without any details as to what that equipment is used for and by whom for what and it's my understanding further that the Land Preservation Committee does not grant permits or make decisions they are a referral body under the land preservation program exclusively just a review body. My second point is that if the ZBA does accept jurisdiction and makes too broad an interpretation of the agricultural production it can be challenged not only on traditional lines but here on the basis that it constitutes an alienation of the development rights that were granted by the town and throws you into that whole remedy. We have seen this result in a disastrous form in the Suffolk County Chapter VIII code interpretation recently by the Supreme Court and I'm afraid that this would be an engraved invitation to Mr. Amper to come in and make this same type of arguments. As to the merits of the application I don't think Chapter XXV of the code as it was then written allows the proposed use. The deed specifically quotes former section XXV-40 as defining agricultural production which is now the only use permitted and it also gives the town the teeth to prohibit the use of the premises for any purpose other than agricultural production. While Chapter XXV did specifically allow equipment storage and structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes I don't think that structures containing equipment used in a commercial enterprise to service and support other people's vineyards was contemplated nor is it permitted. It's not going to be used exclusively for agricultural production. It will be used in connection with a contractor's business which happens to be related to agriculture. So you're really faced with a series of questions in making any decision. The first is, is providing support services to a farmer the same as being a farmer? One salient factor which distinguishes the applicant here from a farmer i.e.: a person who engages in agricultural production is that he is not economically in the position of a farmer. He does not have the risk of agricultural production. He has no skin in the game. If there's a crop failure he could get paid anyway he doesn't bear the risk of crop price fluctuation. This distinguishes him from a farmer who is engaged in agricultural production who suffers the ups and downs of the industry. He is a paid contractor not a producer. His statement that he needs this size building and I think it was over 8,000 square feet to house equipment that is necessary to tend an eight acre vineyard if that statement is true allies the fact that is highly unlikely that someone with that small a vineyard to tend would possibly justify the expense of a building of this size and type. The second question I raise and it's really a series of questions if he is considered a farmer engaged in agricultural production does he get to use that property with development rights sold to provide commercial services to other farmers even though those services are agricultural in nature or is it merely a commercial business that happens to have AG producers as customers? If he was exclusively a spraying company could he store all his spray and pesticides in this location and travel all over the North Fork and perhaps S March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting elsewhere to spray people's farms? Could he land his spray helicopter in the field, refill hi tanks and fly off to whichever farmer hired him to spray the crops? s k a lot questions that we may or may not have answers to and I don't think that'swhatppis the u program of about or what the deed allows. The third question, why should he get to keepall commercial equipment on preserved land when he is not using it for his agricultural production? If he uses the equipment for his farms whether he owns if or even if he rents is elsewhere and it's his crop I would say that's permitted and in line with the program but thi building is admittedly intended to house equipment that travels elsewhere and a contractor vineyard. His website lists six vineyards that he works that was back in 2016 1 don't know how many he has now. It's not uncommon for a vineyard owner to hire a contractor to come in and tend their vineyards and that's a legitimate business out here. The production is taking place on the vineyard owner's farm. I don't think as far as the vineyard owner goes it matters who does the labor their still engaged in agricultural production. For instance One Woman is out the re tending her vineyard everyday on her own land but there could be a vineyard owner who works in NYC in his office and hires someone to tend his vineyard that's agricultural production but this situation is the reverse. The contractor is the commercial contractor and his base operations for that commercial business should not be on preserved land. Another consideration that I just want to touch on briefly and I'm sorry this is so long is code section 280-13 the zoning code which defines allowable uses on AC zoned land which I believe this is That section does allow barns and storage buildings but these are listed under the umbrella an agricultural use permitted on the property. A commercial business as this may apart from even apart from the development rights deed restrictions be precluded by the zoning ordinance. I would be remised that's basically my argument but I do think I want to menti although it may not be exactly pertinent to this application what a stupid location this is for on building and I don't think farmers need should be overly regulated by the town on wherethe could put their agricultural business buildings but it makes no sense to me why he wouldlacy ce it smack in the middle of the frontage orient to along the road rather than turn to run east west and tucked under the hillside on the northern portion of the property up close to Alvahs La He's got the same kind of access he's not going to be tampering with one of the rine. agricultural soils right in the middle of the property where he has proposed it and the pro e that visual impact I'm quite sure from living in the area and maybe there are other as m that know that but there is a this proposed building location is directly over a shale or al w ere course that runs southerly it starts up north behind Michael Kolaski s property water through this property right in the area where he's proposing his building under s southwest further southwest behind Paul Kolaski's house on the west side of Alva der Lane s Lane southwest along the easterly side of the Macari Cutchogue property under the Main further connect to the headlands of Downs Creek. You can see that from the contours. It probably was part of Downs Creek at one time and I wouldn't think it's a sensible location .for a buildin � f 6 March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting There are several houses that were built in the path of this water course for instance Mary Barren's house and they have documented drainage issues in their basements and crawl spaces. I don't know again that the ZBA can address this location issue but you should someone definitely should. So if you decide that you do have jurisdiction in this case I urge you to hold the hearing open for further input. If you feel it necessary, but in any event because it does have huge consequences to the land preservation program and the farming industry thank you and I have copies of this for you. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Thank you Gail. Just so the record is as complete as possible and is balanced as possible since there is no one here including Mr. Ackermann to question with regard to the operation on the property or the proposed operation I'm going to read something from a letter that he submitted I guess to the Planning Board let me see we received this December 21, 2016 this was submitted originally to this is a copy and it was dated January 12, 2017. The Planning Board had access to the same information but I'm going to just read an excerpt this is from William Ackermann to summarize the proposed barn is to store equipment that I use to manage my own Alvahs Lane vineyard plus vineyards that I lease and manage. I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive. The equipment rotates around in season and sits in storage in the winter. All of the equipment is also used on site to manage my own vines and property. The equipment will be stored at Alvahs Lane regardless as I have purchased the property to be a working farm. I'm going to skip down a little bit so he is using this equipment to farm the twenty three acres on Alvahs Lane that he owns nine of which are currently planted in vines, ten more are proposed to be ten more acres are proposed to be planted in vines and then he goes on to say the following other vineyards he grows and sells fruit from his own vineyard plus grows and sells fruit from leased blocks in other vineyards and manages consults for non-leased areas of other vineyards and he's leasing an acre and managing six acres at Clovis Point Vineyard. He's leasing eleven acres at Jason's Vineyard, he's leasing and managing twenty acres at Anderson on the Bay Vineyard on South Harbor Lane in Southold. He leases and manages twenty seven acres at Hounds Tree Estate on Oregon Road. He is a consulting manager for two hundred and twenty three acres of Pindar Vineyard and Pindar uses its own equipment. He oversees and directs the vineyard management and then he is also a consulting manager for ninety acres of vineyard owned by Lieb Vineyards. He also is engaged in seasonal spraying services for their ninety acres. So that's kind of a summary of what he's entered T.A. DUFFY : Do you mind if I ask a question? CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Not at all. I just wanted to read some of that in so that we have a sense of what information our Board has at our disposal. March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting T. A. DUFFY : Putting aside what you said about referring it back to the Building Inspector but I do agree that if the Board has jurisdiction it would only be under 280-13 we wouldn't be looking at the deeded rights, that would be a Town Board. I agree that this Board should not be getting into what the deeded rights mean. With regard to 28-13 do you have an opinion as to where it said here he's using equipment for his own, which is now eight acres in production for that property but then they're also using it for you know his business of caring for other people's vineyards as well, do you think that's contemplated by 280-13 or could you address that? ABIGAIL WICKHAM : Well, I addressed it very briefly I think that that section of 280-13 which is 1 or A is about agricultural production on the particular parcel. That's what it says you can do on a parcel in that zone and that would be this parcel here this twenty three acres so I don't know how you get to that from there to saying the barn that is allowed on that parcel can be used as a commercial contractor's yard. That's what he is he's a commercial contractor. With respect to his self-serving statement about what he owns and leases I don't know if the Board has seen any of the leases how far they go I think they're a huge factual questions here. Yea you can easily skirt around this thing by putting together a lease on paper and maybe it says what it needs to or not but that's not what is happening here he's getting paid to manage these vineyards. He said that in his application he says it on his website so I think there has to be a lot more detail furnished and proof furnished to the Board before they can feel comfortable making a decision. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well while you're up there you know a lot about farming. You come from a long history with farming family and Southold Town. ABIGAIL WICKHAM : I've been told I'm not though. I can't repair a tractor that's for sure. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Neither can I but I can drive one though. What I've been told by people who do farm that it is not uncommon practice cause farm equipment is so expensive to share that equipment among many farms. ABIGAIL WICKHAM : Absolutely. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Someone will borrow something form somebody or ask them to some over with their tractor or whatever a harvester and that's the line of questioning I suppose is the intensity of the use that we would have questioned the applicant no it's not the applicant Planning Board is the applicant we would of questioned the Mr. Ackermann on the way in which he manages or proposes to manage his the subject property in relationship to other properties because we have had before us barns that you know were perfectly legitimate `agricultural storage facilities in which it was clear that the farmer actually loaned equipment or March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting in some cases did something with the equipment on a neighbors farm or whatever and so we do understand that that does happen out here but we are also aware that we need to take a look at the intensity of use and you know I don't know the number of employees he has and the number of people that he might be employing to go and take that equipment and use it on other people's property. The code is not a hundred percent clear which I guess is where the interpretation has to come in as to whether or not the use of equipment farming equipment must be only used on the subject property in which the agricultural structure is located which clearly some of it is going to be. I mean it's a small area planted and is proposed to be increased in the number of acres of planting but I see the points you're making. I mean it's quite a challenge for us to have to ABIGAIL WICKHAM : It is a challenge I don't think that a farmer who has equipment is precluded from contracting out to another farm you know when he's not using the equipment. The farming industry is actually one of the most cooperative industries I've seen particularly out here. They do not only lend equipment back and forth but they contract back and forth because you can't possibly buy all the equipment you need but that's different than what's happening here. First of all this is preserved land number one. I'm not going to name names but the farmers I know that may do that on when they're not using their own equipment house their equipment on non-development rights land it is in their barns but I think it's a legitimate purposed because they have legitimate farming operations of their own both on their land or land they lease so yea,they may travel a bit away from their home farm base but they do it as part of their operation.That's always happened. It should always be allowed to happen but this is a very bigger project and I think you're right it's very fact specific and it's his main business it's not just a side line when his tractor or his sprayer isn't being used on his vineyard you know he could probably hire it out to somebody that Macari next door let's say if they needed it but to say you know he's going to take that sprayer and make a business a running around all over the place and taking other farms that's what he's using his sprayer for. That's the primary use of it. It's not just to spray his stuff or other people's stuff in the off time. It's his primary business and he said that in the application so it's a fine line but it's an important distinction cause you don't want to hamper farmers who need the extra income to be able to utilize their equipment productively in keeping with what their supposed to be doing in the overall program. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Is there other people who would like to address the application? NANCY SAWASTYNOWICZ : Good afternoon Nancy Sawastynowicz. I have a copy so you can get the spelling. My grandparents farmed on Alvahs Lane in Cutchogue beginning almost one hundred years ago. On February 5, 1999 my grandmother sold development rights of our ancestral farm land to Southold Town. By selling the development rights my grandmother took a monetary loss to protect the family farm. Our family did not want the fertile land to become (C D Fra,--- t,,) ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM P.O. Box 1424 �° MAR 0 2 2011 13015 Main Road Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 Y. � 631-298-8353 Fax 631-298-8565 March 2, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Ackerman Agricultural Barn Appeal#7037, "Interpretation" Ladies and Gentlemen: I am submitting this letter in connection with the interpretation request of the Planning Board as to whether the proposed agricultural equipment storage building for a vineyard management operation qualifies as a permitted storage use on development rights-sold land. I understand that the question before the Board is whether this proposed building use qualifies as agricultural production under the restrictions of the Deed of Development Rights ("Deed")to which the property is subject. While I am an avid advocate of farming and the development rights program, I am concerned that this project does not fit within the program and is at variance with the Deed. The application raises many questions which go to the heart of the land preservation program. In addition to my general interest in the case, my special connection to the case is that I own property near the subject property, at 24085 Main Road, Cutchogue,NY. The first question is one of jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Deed quotes Chapter 25 of the Town Code in defining the developments which were acquired by the Town, and an interpretation of this provision is arguably the basis of the ZBA's jurisdiction. However, as the matter concerns a deed of development rights granted to the Town, is it rather the Town Board,perhaps with the aide of an opinion of the Town Attorney,that should be deciding this question,not the ZBA? One could also argue that the Building Inspector is the one with the authority to decide this question, as it is a usage question. The Building Inspector in this case was given an application for an agricultural building, with no details as to where or how the equipment stored there was to be used or any other information as to the use of the building. The facts of the actual building use were not detailed until the Planning Board hearing on the site plan. Therefore, one could argue that the matter should be sent back to the Building Inspector, with the facts now elicited for his consideration,to determine whether the Notice of Disapproval requires amendment. If it is,the remedy to any party feeling aggrieved would then be to go to the ZBA, or perhaps the Town Board directly, as the Town owns the development rights. So I think this is a very thorny jurisdictional issue in the first instance,which you will have to address. Secondly, if the ZBA accepts jurisdiction and makes too broad an interpretation of agricultural production, it can be challenged not only on traditional lines,but in this case, on the basis that it constitutes an alienation of the development rights acquired by the Town. We have seen the results of that in disastrous form in the Suffolk County Chapter 8 litigation. This case could be an engraved invitation to Mr. Amper. As to the merits of the application, I do not believe that Chapter 25 of the Town Code allows the proposed use. The Deed quotes the former Section 25-40 of the Code as it defines agricultural production,which is the only use now permitted, together with the teeth of granting the Town the right to prohibit the use of the premises for any purpose other than agricultural production. While the section specifically allows structures for "equipment storage" and"structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes", I submit that structures containing equipment used in a commercial enterprise to service and support other people's vineyards was not contemplated and is not permitted. The proposed structure is not going to be used exclusively for agricultural production; it is used in connection with a contractor's business which happens to be related to agriculture. This case presents a series of questions: 1. Is providing support services to a farmer the same as being a farmer? One salient factor which distinguishes the applicant from a farmer, i.e., a person who engages in agricultural production, is that he is not economically in the position of a farmer. He has no risk of an agricultural operation, no skin in the game. If there's a crop failure, does he get paid anyway? He does not bear the risk of crop price fluctuation. This distinguishes him from a farmer who is engaged in agricultural production and suffers the ups and downs of the industry. He is a paid contractor,not a producer. His statement that he needs this size building to house the equipment that is necessary to tend his very small vineyard on site, if true, belies the fact that it is highly unlikely that a small vineyard operation as is located on his Alvah's Lane farm could possibly justify the expenditure for a building of this size and type. 2. If he is considered a farmer engaged in agricultural production, does he get to use his property for providing commercial services to other farmers, even though those services are agricultural in nature? Or is it merely a commercial business that happens to have ag producers as customers? If he was exclusively a spray company, could he store all his spray and pesticides in this location and travel all over the North Fork and beyond to spray people's farms? Could he land his spray copter in the field, refill his tanks, and fly off to whichever farmer Hired him to spray the crops? That's not what this program is about and it's not what the deed allowed. 3. Why should he get to keep all of his commercial equipment on preserved land when he is not using it for his production? If he uses the equipment for his farms,those he owns or leases, and it is his crop,that would seem to be permitted'.and in line with the program. But his building is clearly intended to house equipment that travels elsewhere in a contractor business. His tending the 6 vineyards listed on his website last year as customers as a vineyard manager is akin to a landscaping contractor. Many vineyard owners hire contractors come in to tend their vineyards, some from planting to harvest. The production is taking place on the vineyard owner's farm, and I don't think it matters who does the labor—whether it be One Woman who is out there every day running the show on her own land, or an owner who keeps an eye on things from his office in a NYC Tower while he hires a contractor. Those owners are both engaged in agricultural production on their farms. The contractor is just that—a commercial contractor. His base of operations for that commercial business cannot be preserved land. Another consideration in this debate is Code Section 280-13, defining the allowable uses on A-C zoned land. Barns and storage buildings are allowed in the Zone,but these are listed under the umbrella of an agricultural use as permitted on the property. A commercial business such as this may, apart from the development rights deed, should be precluded by the zoning ordinance. I would be remiss if I did not mention what a stupid, yes stupid, location the applicant has chosen for the proposed building. While a farmer should not be overly regulated by the Town in where a permitted farm building may be located, it makes no sense to me why it would be placed smack in the middle of the frontage, oriented along the road, rather than turned to run east/west and moved to the northerly portion of the property just off Alvah's Lane at the bottom of the hillside. Aside from the visual impact,this is a location of prime soils on the property, and is also directly over a watercourse/swale that runs behind the Michael Kaloski property, southwest through this property, across (under)Alvah's Lane, behind Paul Kaloski's house, and further southwest along the easterly side of Macari Cutchogue, under the Main Road, and connects to the headlands of Downs Creek. It probably was part of Down's Creek at one time. I would not think it a sensible or appropriate location for a building. There are several houses that were built in the path of this watercourse and they have documented drainage issues in their basements and crawlspaces. I don't know that the ZBA can address this location issue, but someone definitely should. Should you decide that you have jurisdiction in this case, I urge you to hold the hearing open for further for input on this application,because it will have huge consequences to the land preservation program and the farming industry. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, 'Abi ill A. Wickham March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting MARIL SAWASTYNOWICZ : Two GMC 3500 Denali heavy duty pickup trucks, 2 trailers (30 x8.6'), 4 utility trailers (17x8.6'), 1 Kubota L6060 tractor with loader and a plow (22x8.6'), 1 Kubota L4400 tractor with loader (17x8.6'), 2 Kubota L6040 tractors with rotary mowers (22x8.6'), 3 Kubota L7040 tractors with LIPCO sprayers (25x8.6'), 1 Kubota JD5500 tractor with CIMA sprayer (25x8.6'), 2 herbicide (8x6'), 2 Vicon spreaders (8x6'), 3 fail mowers (8x6'), 2 hedgers (8x6'), 1 leaf remover (8x6'), 1 PTO wood chipper (12x6'), 1 chipper and vac (18x8.6'), 2 post pounders (8x6'), 2 net masters (8x6'), 1 perfecta disc (8x6'), 2 bucket grapplers (8x6') and 2 Clemens (8x6') whatever that is. That's quite a lot of equipment for one as he stated in his own words was only going to be eight acres farmed on that property. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Okay would you submit that to us and then we'll make sure all the rest of the Board members receive copies anyone else? RICHARD MATTHEW : Madame chairwoman, members of the Board, counsel my name is Richard Matthew. I am the deep pockets that just bought the lot for over $150,000 an acre up the road from the subject property. I also am an attorney on the South Fork. I have served as counsel to the Zoning Board for the town of East Hampton. I've also served as chair on the Zoning Board of the Town of Southampton. My practice is limited to real estate and land use matters. You might I think I have some experience in zoning I hope that you won't think that I'm wrong. I think the very asking of the question that the Planning Board has sent to you is this a permitted use shows that it's not a permitted use, shows that it is not consistent with our agricultural practices as they were know in 1999 or as they're known today in 2017. Clearly as a barn built a house some forty eight pieces of equipment are not intended just for the purpose of farming on that eight acres or that eight acres of that twenty two and a half acre parcel. I think Ms. Wickham has pointed out very clearly and very appropriately that the business that the applicant or that the owner of the property has the person who's application is the subject of this hearing has another business which is using contracting labor and or equipment in other places. I think that he's made mention of that in his applications to the Planning Board. He's also said things about the tried to bootstrap his application to qualify as agricultural. He's talked about the potential for having livestock or other equipment or other production on this property. However there's been no attempt to do so notwithstanding his (inaudible) to the contrary. I think that the question before us is, is this consistent with agricultural practices. I think that the counsel has asked the question about 280-13 and looked at is a barn a necessary customary accessory use to a farm. Of course it is you couldn't say that it isn't. However, when you had your farm and you have a barn for your tractor whether you use it on your farm alone or you're lending it to your neighbor or till your neighbor's field as a favor or for money is different from having a commercial agricultural warehouse garage where you have forty eight pieces of equipment that you're taking out specifically to other places. I think that the list of the equipment is very telling in this case. I have a couple of letters from Benja Schwartz, Nancy } March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting Sawastynowicz's husband. They're quite pithy in their content and I'm not going to read them all. However, I think that it's very telling to note as Mr. Schwartz is pointing at if the NFVS only wanted to build a warehouse they would of bought a smaller property. This is a piece of property that was sold at a discount to market value because the development rights are stripped. He should of bought in LI or AC zones with the development rights intact so other as it stands now the taxpayers of the Town of Southold are going to be subsidizing Mr. Ackermann's operation there and I think that Ms. Wickham had a very good point about having the Town Board intervene in this application or in remanding this application to the Town Board for its consideration since they are the people who purchased the development rights. Mr. Schwartz letter speaks to that as well. Ms. Wickham again has pointed out the contradictory statements that are relative to the applicant or Mr. Ackermann's Prodi stations as to what his use on the property is relative to his statement to the Board concerning other properties that he has interests in whether those interests are ownership or merely the management of them. I think that I'll submit these to you for your file and ask (inaudible) any questions that you might have. MEMBER HORNING : Sir while you're here could I ask you to identify your parcel on right there perhaps oh you're on the other side? RICHARD MATTHEWS : On the other side number 1000-101-1-16.5. MEMBER HORNING : So you're not adjacent to the parcel?Yes okay thank you. T. A. DUFFY : Can I ask you a question I just want to clarify something you said. I thought I heard you say that he should have bought property either in LI or in AC with property rights intact. RICHARD MATTHEWS : With the development rights intact exactly so. T. A. DUFFY : So you're saying under our zoning code under AC that his proposed use would be allowed if the property rights were intact? Because Ms. Wickham RICHARD MATTHEWS : Ms. Wickham said the opposite to the contrary. I'm suggesting that it certainly isn't permitted on development rights stripped property. I don't know your code well enough to speak to whether it would be or not be. My gut is that it wouldn't be and I wouldn't disagree with her. T. A. DUFFY : That's why I want to clarify it. RICHARD MATTHEWS : I think that she's absolutely correct in that. I believe it wouldn't be but with the development rights stripped there's no way in God's green earth that it could be permitted. T. A. DUFFY : Okay thank you just want to clarify that. March 2, 2017, Diane Crosser,ZBA Hearing: Re: Ackerman Site Plan The Zoning regulations, as stated in the Southold Town Code,for Agricultural-Conservation, (Chapter 280,Article 111),and Light Industrial District (Chapter 280,Chapter XV) are very similar in terms of use. "The agricultural operations and accessory uses, including irrigation, raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming....barns..." are permitted uses under AC zoning. "Contractors' businesses or yards, including but not limited to building,electrical, plumbing, and landscapers'yards" however, are permitted uses only in industrial zoned properties. They are permitted INDUSTRIAL USES.A proposed 'barn' used to house tractors,sprayers,etc.,for a MANAGEMENT CONSULTING COMPANY, which requires TWO curb cut outs for"safe tractor access from Alvahs' Lane",for the management of hundreds of acres of vines (William Ackerman,Site Plan, 8/24/16) is a BUSINESS, and belongs in industrially zoned property. A site used for chemical and fuel storage required for the operations of a Vineyard Management Company, is part of that BUSINESS.The e-mail of the applicant, himself, isBill@NFVS.BIZ.That is a BUSINESS. On October 3, 2016,when asked by Heather Lanza if the applicant intended to property was going to be used for NFVS LLC,as a business, he did not reply. According to the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan, "Generally,agriculture and residences peacefully co-exist.The goal is to provide a balance between supporting agriculture and ensuring neighborhoods are protected from large adverse impact.Another goal is the, "prevention and reduction of traffic congestion and promote efficient and safe circulations of vehicles and pedestrians."A VINEYARD MANAGEMENT BUSINESS acknowledging access for tractors to and from Alvahs' Lane, requiring two curb cuts outs, a fuel and pump stations cannot will most certainly have a NEGATIVE impact on the neighborhood,the ground water,and quality of life. The Southold Town Comprehensive Plan (page 22/56),calls for, "REGULATION of agricultural uses in the Town of Southold is necessary to facilitate and encourage 'bona fide'agricultural operations,while providing for the HEALTH,SAFETY,AND WELFARE OF TOWN RESIDENTS AND VISITORS." WE ASK THAT YOU USE THE AUTHORITY OF YOUR POSITION OF PROTECT US FROM MISUSE OF PROPERTY TO BENEFIT ONE PERSON-the applicant,who stands to profit from use of a property the development rights of which were paid for by the taxpayers of Southold Town. Miriam Webster Dictionary defines, 'bona fide' as, "authentic, real,true, actual,without intention to deceive". For over one year,the applicant attempted to deceive the Town by submitting false information, in an effort to bring his BUSINESS plans to fruition. He stated (8/24/16)that his site plan, "is an amendment to site plan previously approved the Southold Town Planning Dept." THERE WAS NO APPROVED SITE PLAN, as per Brian Cummings,Tracy(Building Dept), Mr. Kiely,(Town Attorney Office), and Scott Russell,Southold Town Supervisor.The original site plan was submitted by Belle River LLC for a horse barn and stables expired March, 2015.The remainder of discrepancies throughout this planning stage are included in the paperwork which I am submitting for review. At the Southold Town Planning Board on October 2, 2016, Mr.Ackerman stated, "there's roughly eight acres of vineyard, and the rest of the parcel, its 22.8, is not conducive to putting a vineyard on, so it's just be grass. Fast forward to 1/12/17, and the applicant,who has met with opposition and disapprovals of this project, now states, he needs, "an agricultural equipment and livestock barn for the"21 acres being actively farmed".Smoke and mirrors and a building proposal which morphs into something else, each time approval to build his warehouse is not granted. If I use terms words,wigeon, pochard, Khaki Campbell, black scoter, Hawaiian koloa,you might not know what I am talking about. They are all ducks. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck. If a warehouse is used for storage for a for profit business, it is a industrial/business use not agricultural use. Wording in a site plan cannot be arbitrarily changed to suit the needs of the applicant- that is a deceptive and not in the spirit of bona fide, as noted in the Southold Town Comprehensive Plan. Richard Amper, Executive Director of the Long Island Pine Barrens Society, responded to this site plan, stating," It is clear that the proposed use does not constitute agricultural use.The applicant's use is intended to involve off-site business use of a general service nature. Especially concerning is the precedent that would be set,were the usage to be permitted." While Mr. Amper is referring to destruction of Southold Town's purchase of development rights, it will set another equally disturbing precedent.As per the Town Comprehensive Plan Update (page 22/56), "residential zoning districts are IDENTICAL to the AC zoning districts in their list of permitted uses".With that in mind- I can enlarge my garage,get a lift, and buy tools,equipment, parts, and chemicals to work on my vehicles.Then people notice I do great work,they bring their vehicles to my home, and I travel with my equipment to service vehicles. I needed the space and equipment for my personal use (permitted), but I have now turned it into a business. I grow lavender, roses,and my husband has a vegetable garden. I need a shed to sort my equipment (permitted). People see our gardens, and ask me to manage their gardens, so I pop a "Landscaper sign" on my truck, and travel to my customers. I needed the shed and equipment for my personal residential use, but I have now turned it into a business. We host large parties, and people are impressed. I need a storage unit to store table,chairs,tents, glassware(permitted). People ask me to plan and run their events. I needed the items for my personal use, but I have now turned it into a business. Approval of a site plan of"growing management company"to store the company's equipment to maintain"hundreds of acres of vineyards",when only eight on this property are in use,will open the flood gates for anyone desiring to conduct business on property not zoned for such use. Approval will certainly invite a legal challenge, resulting in misuse of taxpayer monies to pay for litigation, bought on from an approval of building a warehouse on protected farm land. Thank you for your time. Attachments OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A.SPIRO Town Hall Annex ,ND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 54375 State Route 25 melissa,spino@town.southold.ny.us (comer of Main Rd&Youngs Ave) Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REQUEST FOR AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ON LAND SUBJECT TO TOWN DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EASEMENT Tax Map No. 1000-_/D-j ---, a e _---_ CP•../_ .. I am the owner of the property described below and on which the Town purchased a development rights/conservation easement on or about if 1 (!date). ,f Name of Owner(please print): -1� ` [! '�-1 C"I,�I 't1�' C�il�"(11C L., C Name(s)of previous owner: (ff applicable) Mailing Address:' r ;I Phone Number: t v— e-mail Address: A V5� Iris Property Location: yaM Tl':'+fl List type,size,and use of each agricultural structure proposed: c am- "Z *Attach location map (survey, tax map, or sketch plan) showing placement area of agricultural structure(s), distance from property boundary lines,and any readily available information relating to your request. You may talk with the Coordinator at (631)765-5711 to discuss questions or to arrange to participate in any of the regular meetings of the Land Preservation Committee. //�//W I Applicant Date Please return the completed form with attachments to: Town of Southold-Land Preservation Department *All attachments must be signed and dated by property owner. �+_l { v u 4,10° 12- C 1 f 1 9! p I I L `I i�w Ir ewn�.ua. I all I I FOR INTERNAL USE UNL'1 i SITE P LAN USE DETER[�I IN _ Qu� nj rInitalDetewnation IiBoar d Date Sent: Date: / '� _ � CSC--•1�. � -- -.•- Project Name:_ Project Address ^ Y—- -'J_ � �Zoning District,. �-- �x Map Ct0t3=��` ---�—_ Suffolk County•T — Request - --=-' -—- orcin dor:u�nentation-as to of Building Permit Application and su.pp 9 tNote: COP,proposed use or uses s "ex" hould be s�ibr��ilted') r lnitia-I Determination as to whether use is l �— - ation as to whether site plan is required:_([,j� Initial-Determ�n ----- - -- --- - - - - - -- - - signatureof Building t pecto Planning Department(P.D.) Referral:- --_ Da to of COMnIenL____ 1 p.-D.'Date Received* CommC1� s:J ► $-.,, � L . l r T4s, ►r'�4,.�l4` - ' Signalu of Planning Dept.tS if Reviewer Final Determination Date:------�--•---z-_ __ Decision: FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT S.OUTHOLDT N Y_ NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 7, 2016 TO: North Fork Viticultural Services LLC PO Box 633 Laurel,NY 11948-0633 Please take notice that your application dated May2,2016 For permit to construct an agricultural building at Location of property: 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 6_1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposcd use requires site pian approval from the Southold Town Planrjjqacrd. _-- -s i Authorized Signat4e-._ Cc:File,planning art Town of Southold LiVRPCON S1STEN( 11ASS11SSNf1+NTFt'RlI A. INSTRUCTIONS 1 All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Rawd Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed actio1i will be evaluated as to its significant berieficial and adverse effects upon tile coastal are-,a ;which includes all car Sotiffiol- Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be ex brined in detail. listing both ,n]P or-tirle and "on- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy ofthe LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork_net),the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SIVE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM-#i 1 p 2 PROJECT NAME_ : V S E 2.M N , 43A AZ,A) The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. Y Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response). (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e_g. capital F_I construction, planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: ��!! V r4 pr T MiF N i3i 4v'C)UT HU'Y-•iy? SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL D! Tom: Nordi Foil,ViLicultLvryl Senices LLIC Jo Bow 6,33 LaureI.ITY 11948-0633 Pieme,tnke notice that your application.dated(Majr?.. 0016 Far pL niao construct ars agicultural building at B'WG3s 4, Y Is retia-ncd hoc nmvfith:aJ a disappfoved.on-the following grounds. �1:.' i;':!i?(�ic? :Ilii 1".:!lll11"ti:• �7(C _11i1!i al?�?1'tt\'ail 1fUi!1 ia�>�Llil �._Q Tv_.i.. '. f.__._�l:� r_rt�l (i, 2 Kecetpt NO. 8 0 D I D Southold, New York 11971 Date Deceived of ef'r tur - --- - - - --� ;`l OODollars For Fee for Fee for Fee for Fee For Fee for -Certificate Ele&kUl ❑ Sign ❑ Flood Development Prnt. ❑ Building Permit ❑ of Occupancy ❑ inspection ❑ Cash O/ Checko 0 Building Department County Tax Map No_ 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 5.1 Is retumed herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: lire cd u-se ry ui 4 �;itr_x laai gLnprovall ii°c+-m_the Southold T.aw Plannu���xu�l, kudiol-iZed Sieriatdre-- Cc: File,planning OFFICE LOCATION: � MELISSA A. SPIRO �' � �Uj,�, =y� Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR f +4�,` ► 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us r� ~ '� 1(90mer of Main Road& Youngs Avenue) Si } Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 rr. Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 1179 Y_a Ll ' Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the"L" shaped Barn building. b. Workshop w/Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "L" shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. During meetings we had prior to the Committee review, you clarified that the"Home in Phase 2" was not proposed to be located within the area subject to Town Easement, and would be proposed only on an adjacent 0.351 acre lot known as SCTM# 1000-102,-{1-9.1. This lot is not subject to Town C=asement, and you are looking to purchase and merge this property with the property subject to easement. If the purchase and merger occur, you are proposing to construct the house, and to attach sane to the Barn/Workshop area, by constructing the additional building area shown as proposed Garage w/Office Above." Due to the fact that the "Home in Phase 2" is not proposed within the area subject to Easement,the Committee did not review the"Home in Phase 2." In addition, the proposed"Garage w/Office Above"was not reviewed or approved, as this part of the structure is not part of the current application since the adjacent lot has not been purchased or merged with the subject property. The Committee's review consisted of review of the"L" shaped Agricultural Barn building (estimated from floor plan as being a building of approximately 96t'x 47' and 41'x 40) and the separate Pump House structure (16' x 20') shown as including the following uses proposed for agricultural purposes: • Equipment Storage. • Workshop w/Small Bath • Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed The recorded easement for this property restricts the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as defined in Chapter 70 to the Town Code. Section 25-50-C. (2)[3] requires that the Committee serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights have been acquired by the Town. The Land preservatitin Committee members concluded their review and found that the agricultural uses described above, shown as located within the 12` haped Barn building and' the Pump House, are agricultural uses consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement. Please note that the Committee's approval of this use within the easement does not mean that such use or buildings will be approved or permitted by other departments or agencies.The Committee's approval allows you to proceed with pursuing any applicable approvals that are required by Town Code. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, f Melissa Spiro Land Preservation :,-oordinator enc. application w/attachments cc: Building Department w/enc. Planning Board w/enc. HIT u : ,I --- .. , I I � I S I I I , l I I I 1 I � I f 3 � I 1B"■17 Owlrtl Oaar 7 ' inn -- 4 � tY !y a X 1 77 fr_ � --'-- ►,� to ;_`; � « to i t � f s � ia•x it 0.~OM f a ��).7 "'�= � OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. SPIRO �0 �f so Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 1' p 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road&Youngs Avenue) Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 Facsimile(631)765-6640 & MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.Box 1179 ` sra7'• Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM#1000-102.-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 2550 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Bern and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated)with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: clutz 2 E n!T >a. Equipment Storage This use Is shown as being within the larger part of the"L" shaped Barn building. b. Workshop w/Small Bath �. This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the"L" shaped Barn building. �v INc,w or o I�v CAAt R.sM c. Garage w/Office Above pg')Nu so t,-- This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. 13A-R_N LOQ.,o It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased GM*NgT and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. (ao30tc.wr 4iTic j A^T 7111S Pt440(A l f e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. OFFICE LOCATION: MELIS S A A. S PlR U Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spirogtown.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road&Youngs Avenue) Southold,New York Te1gftn a((y31)765-5711 Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re. Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2046, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3) of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "L" shaped Barn building b. Workshop w/Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "U shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the"Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. MAILING 1ADl`7>:ZESS: V' E fes P.O. Box 1179 PT Soullhold, NY 11971 RS DOIN?LD J.WILCENSKI Chair ii r .•; OFF CSE.' 1,0C T ION. Toga=n Hall Annex 4\'ILLI1I%1 J. C8ER4ERS y 1375 Stale Route 23 PIERCE,RikFFERTY f." `r`' =. .c :� ;a-)t% it%aila Rd. &Youngs,,e.? J�u131;S H.RICH III rR, C '-- ' ibLARTII`I H.SIDOI2 ';.-" ��Ui41�. Southold. NY _ Telephone: 631 755-1938 -,v-%vw.soathof dtownny.goy= CE TO' TN OF SOUTHIOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: August 29, 2016 Re: Checks Please deposit the attached check into 8691: Deferred Revenue. Fee is for a Site Plan Application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. Appiica4itlProject Name &Type Tax Map# Arnounc ',,heck DatelRl© Ackermann Property Amended Site Plan 102-4-6.1 8/26/16 $752.50 North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC #3330 -._ ; HANK OF AMERICA,NA 3330 North Fork Viticultural sarvices, LLC C--'-2311210 F,o.Box 633 8/26/2016 Lauri,NY ".948-0633 - — - t:3'ii65G-8G_2 ri �i $--752.50 PAYTOTHE 01srn Gi .Southold ORDER OF DOLLARS Seven Hundred Fifty--Ty-VQ-8'd Town of Southold 11�Mrp' ��Ifllfam i;E fiCke ��n �'' N 4- - -Site Plan Fee 11e00J330iia : Q0210003221: L�6302513218Silo Southold Planning Department Statf Report Site Plan Application Work Session —Completeness Date September 12, 2016 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Ackermann Agricultural Barn (formerly"Belle River Properties") Applicant: William C. Ackermann Date of Submission. August 29, 2016 Tax Map Number: 102.4-6.1 Project Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Zoning District: A-C Il. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Agricultural Acreage of Project Site: ±22.7 acres Town Development Rights; Building Size 7,142sf This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue. III: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis 1. Existing: planted vineyard and pasture; Expired site plan for Belle River properties (March 2015) for horse barn and stables; 2. Proposed: ±7,142 "equipment storage and warehouse" building with a proposed area of disturbance of 26,702sf; Staff: the language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building (which is what is permitted on site); the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses on site and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing; 3. SEQR: Type 11 -Agriculture F- 1 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I -PROJECT INFORMATION S i o be coo ieted by Applicant or Projeci Sponsor' __ 1. APPLICANTISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME wt"IA M ACKOMAW ; WVS1"f 1J 94 RN 3- PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality 1 �� �Q - County So F K 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominem landmarks,etc.or provide map) 13.SO ALVAO t ChSf 51 aIF 0 P-L&+D 0)PP",t /IWO" AkOM I NTEf��"M �'fn{ IZ i 25 l N W r�oCt V9' 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: 0 New ❑ Expansion { 1.lodilicationlatteration or— fettviaxiq o-avp sirf l B DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY TID HaGO A& E_QulPAWiJ; PrQI'Rw. a L 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately �2' acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? es ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. TWAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? gResidenlial F� Industrial []Commercial RAgricuiture [] Park/ForesUOpen Space Other Describe: 191WIFk" 1:5 22•'f44W OF DILS° A& LAND IX GWf_ VINiE5 4A& P4Sl 1�2C. S OUDONDINI, AAAA 13 FARMLA Ja A41"D PUSI DEN cos. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGET (FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL)? ElYes L]O No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permWapprovals: 11. DOE ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PER1,11T LIR APPROVAL? Yes ❑No if Yes,list agency(s)name and pemrillapprovals: 'T1*1SIS Ai✓ /AM6A0meA1T- 70 SITS' LAA) Pr6ff J0tWL*( tRAOR&WD 8%( � s0v7-Wk_s 7ZWW Pi,M,41N4 DFS. X 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? �'YEs 11 No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY:,`:':.B'A'LED'; JAL: } J y Date: Signature: •jl•, If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER l�'SPSL}i mote siting of new Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses Pa epros 47 through 56 for e a uat one rt erdant uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies, g Yes ❑ No MNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine re es 57 through gh 62 for evaluaisland tion n criteria�c Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III Policies, Pag ❑Yes ❑ No I--rJ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. 9Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable i S v t f,t-s So�� S1Ccc1. p��7 e- I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section M—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes F1No ['7 -Not Applicable � Y TITLEf DATE PREPARED BY _ -= Anzended on 8'1'05 f ' Location of action: �L- Site acreage= --_..� • Q�,t/P.� – Present land use: Present zoning classification: - - 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: W ILL!.4 AA GlL.ff&A-%ANN (b) Mailing address: P•O. 13 (c) Telephone number Area Code( 1 3L7 (d) Application number,if any: - Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No le If yes,which state or federal agency? _ _ C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRT' Section III–Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. RfYes ❑ No [:] Not Applicable ras�dtf b bt,�t�- Inc e� YAZ -- _ � �_ ��wr ��.� .ill •f-�,e. l�tc re� z a�rS. _ - Attach additional sheets if+iece-sa!�' Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 3 through G for evaluation criteria Yes ElsP No [- Not Applicable 1 Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plan Application Work Session —Completeness Date September 12, 2016 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Ackermann Agricultural Barn (formerly "Belle River Properties") Applicant: William C. Ackermann Date of Submission: August 29, 2016 Tax Map Number: 102.-4-6.1 Project Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Zoning District: A-C II. Description of Project a Type of Site Plan: Agricultural Acreage of Project Site: 1-22.7 acres Town Development Rights; Building Size 7,142sf This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue. III: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis 1. Existing: planted vineyard and pasture; Expired site plan for Belle River properties (March 2015) for horse barn and stables; 2. Proposed: ±7,142 "equipment storage and warehouse" building with a proposed area of disturbance of 26,702sf; Staff: the language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building (which is what is permitted on site); the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses on site and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing; 3. SEQR: Type II -Agriculture 1 Southold Town Planning Board Page 127 October 3, 2L Chairman Wilcenski: So there are three on each side? William Ackermann: Yes, plus windows. James H. Rich III: The elevation shows four? Heather Lanza: Or five? William Ackermann: There is a sliding door in the middle so that I can drive through it and then close it up. Chairman Wilcenski: So there are actually five doors? William Ackermann: If you want to count the sliding door, yea. Chairman Wilcenski: Okay, alright we have a couple of questions. What are the intentions for the proposed use of the land? William Ackermann: The land itself or the barn? Chairman Wilcenski: The land. William Ackermann: The land itself, it's a vineyard now and it's going to stay a vineyard. Chairman Wilcenski: Is it your vineyard? William Ackermann: Yeah. Chairman.Wilcenski: Okay. William Ackermann: There's roughly 8 acres of vineyard, the rest of the parcel, its 22.8, is not conducive to putting a vineyard on. So it'll just be grass. Chairman Wilcenski: So 8 acres of planted vines and 22 acres of- William Ackermann: Its 22.8 total, of which 8 are vines, and then there is buffer area too, I don't know how you want to count that. Its 22.8 acres in total. Chairman Wilcenski: Okay. Anybody else have any questio,is? Heather? Heather Lanza: I do. There are just a couple things we want to have for our record. One of the questions was, we see that the company is called North Fork Viticulture Services, and that is actually the address of it, do you intend to run the business out of this building? William Ackermann: It's where I am going to store the tractors at. .Southold Town Planning Board Page 128 October 3, 2016 �y Heather Lanza: You are only using it to store tractors? William Ackermann: That's it, there's nothing else that needs to be done there, tractors and implements. I would rather have implements stored inside the barn than rather unsightly outside of the barn, that's one of the main reasons. Heather Lanza: Is that the reason for the size of the building, the quantity? William Ackermann: I actually did a schematic, I can forward it to you if your need it, of a footprint to show where all the pieces would fit. I still don't have room for all the implements and things I want to keep under rooves so they are not damaged by weather and what have you. I'd prefer they weren't outside, just kind of randomly sitting around. Heather Lanza: That would be good to provide that to the Board. William Ackermann: Sure, okay. Heather Lanza: How about the two driveways? Normally we like to see one curb-cut, did you have a reason why you wanted the two driveways? William Ackermann: Just because the ease of just driving, all it is, is a u-shape, that's all. There are a lot of houses and other- I don't want to be coming in and out of there onto Alvahs Lane, backing out if you will, I'd rather turn in and make it a safer way to get in and out. If you're familiar with the property up on the north side there is a hill, and quite frankly people do come down there, not necessarily at the speed they should, and so I just felt that it was safer to have it on the flat area where everybody could see comings and goings, whether north or south. Heather Lanza: Okay. The building has dormers, are you intending to add a second floor? William Ackermann: No, we have very light, you're probably familiar with them, picking baskets and picking bins and things of that nature, and I just wanted to make use of some cubic space. Heather Lanza: So there is a second floor? Or not? William Ackerioann: It's a loft, it's just a loft above a barn. No access from outside. Heather Lanza: Is that in any of the materials we have? William Ackermann: Any of the materials, what do you mean? Heather Lanza: Like the drawings or anything, because I didn't notice that, but it could be that I aidn't notice that we had it. That there was going to be a loft? I see a floor- William Ackermann: I gave you the floor plan and the detailed drawings. Aezed l-N.�e�OYs:lrlf) T x „ 111��{�jjlIIIII N Lj .e xr.sr S LL•q 009s01�0 J Jz,LL J{�l•pA71lpV _._ AAz.id Wd�JY�1+OOe1z9�lW 4 9 4 IR -f �J•;s s.x�r:��d-revn+�: JAs?L J�LApllll+l-a/GMz+4�LL l IL r JJ•m l-,� � � r I � � AJr.as s-xe.0 _ ia'xiz'v Rhood D-ft x.arn.-i r,e�i.,.e�•� eRs-. S -- IT 1 N i a j r x a e Aez 3d -��OOl11+1-OIOlI1z�sLL� N IIi•- P AJ•Ji/r -17 .48WfJ+l-eWDOf sexlL I ^-, m • '.J Ay Ad ode O'Jdl1+s-010/W�LL `' I ` �1L na•n .rAiAt �-4�oop�t9lp a n .9 ASA2 6-4PgOOir OtlD `� lgy A .i AslL •POn•oA X' d AAzdi •4am—P-1+0mm-o. s SB'S[ =Y!/�ll r2-9ri`M oPol SAKAi LL+MI�Y+!!+L-OMCW14.'+sIL a3 R T Jaxx t-A@,RL . . 1--mm xuwnve . ar-� ear i •1 r,a-. g " • � " e11 I,4_ q _ M .O AS Ad -Q.-fta 1+L-owin DnpL 4— :wA�Aa A"ooen+z-o10LWs+PZR 2 GMC 3500 Denali Heavy Duty pickup trucks (25x8.6 ) 2 trailers (30x8.6') 1 4 Utility Trailers (17x8.6') 1 Kubota L6060 Tractor with loader and a plow (22x8.6') 1 Kubota L4400 Tractor with loader (17x8.6') 2 Kubota L6040 Tractors with Rotary Mowers (22x8.6 ) 3 Kubota L7040 Tractors with LIPCO Sprayers (25x8.6') 1 Kubota JD5500 Tractor with CIMA Sprayer (25x8.6') 2 Herbicide (8x6') 2 Vicon Spreaders (8x6') 3 Flail Mowers (8x6') 2 Hedgers (8x6') 1 Leaf Remover (8x6') 1 PTO Wood Chipper (12x6') 1 Chipper and Vac (18x8.6') 2 Post Pounders (8x6') aouthold Town Planning Board Page 128 October 3, 2016 40 ` Heather Lanza. You are only using it to store tractors? William Ackermann: That's it, there's nothing else that needs to be done there, tractors and implements. I would rather have implements stored inside the barn than rather unsightly outside of the barn, that's one of the main reasons. Heather Lanza: Is that the reason for the size of the building, the quantity? William Ackermann: I actually did a schematic, I can forward it to you if your need it, of a footprint to show where all the pieces would fit. I still don't have room for all the implements and things I want to keep under rooves so they are not damaged by weather and what have you. I'd prefer they weren't outside, just kind of randomly sitting around. Heather Lanza: That would be good to provide that to the Board. William Ackermann: Sure, okay. Heather Lanza: How about the two driveways? Normally we like to see one curb-cut, did you have a reason why you wanted the two driveways? William Ackermann: Just because the ease of just driving, all it is, is a u-shape, that's all. There are a lot of houses and other- I don't want to be coming in and out of there onto Alvahs Lane, backing out if you will, I'd rather turn in and make it a safer way to get in and out. If you're familiar with the property up on the north side there is a hill, and quite frankly people do come down there, not necessarily at the speed they should, and so I just felt that it was safer to have it on the flat area where everybody could see comings and goings, whether north or south. Heather Lanza: Okay. The building has dormers, are you intending to add a second floor? William Ackermann: No, we have very light, you're probably familiar with them, picking baskets and picking bins and things of that nature, and I just wanted to make use of some cubic space. Heather Lanza: So there is a second floor? Or not? William Ackeriaann: It's a loft, it's just a loft above a barn. No access from outside. Heather Lanza: Is that in any of the materials we have? William Ackermann: Any of the materials, what do you mean? Heather Lanza: Like the drawings or anything, because I didn't notice that, but it could be that I aidn't notice that we had it. That there was going to be a loft? I see a floor- William Ackermann: I gave you the floor plan and the detailed drawings. Artach adcHo!I iI!�sheets-11'""aS&IM- Nikv 3,. E-soha-nce wism-fl-h q- wality and pro'evc- scenic resources throughout the Town. of Southold. See 1, CY WRj?Section IOU ew --Policies Pages 6 through? for a11SA: n io .1teli.2 �Yes F] No 17 Not Applicable rm,Y-;m 1 i e- s e Ago!!, �L'�- tk- 0-�- Attach Y16 "rer&NATIM-4-JI,COAST FOLICMS Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See IM Section DT—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evalvation criteria Nor, [2�'Mat Applicable Artach additional sheets if necessaxy 'D uHr7r :5. Trotect ,prove water auslity and supp -v in the Tow- f So thold See LW F Section MY". �,qd in R_ "Okil-'s Pages 16 through 2-1 for evaluation criteria es ❑ �Tc, 511i,�Tot Applicable Attach addiLlo-nal sheets if necessury I Po j Iiiev 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including significant consial Fish and Wildiife Habitats and wetlands. See VWRP Section IR— Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criterip. 7 -�i LTJ L7 oy� F 4. Code requirements / Bulk Schedule (AC): a. Lot Coverage i. Maximum: 20% ii. Existing: 0% iii. Proposed: 0.718% b. Setbacks for the proposed building (AC) Required Provided Front yard 60' 60' Side SE) 20' 228' Side NW 20' 45 comb 251' Rear yard 75' 671' c. Parking: none proposed. This building is for owner use only; (also as required by Town Development rights easement). i. Two (2) 28' wide curb cuts to Alvah's Lane are proposed d. Drainage: three (3) 8' x 10' deep leaching pools e. Exterior lighting: photometric plan provided on sheet two (2) of the site plan; f. Exterior Signage: none proposed /specified; V: Staff Recommendations 1. It is recommended that the application be found complete for review to begin the coordination process; 2. Set public hearing for October 3, 2016; 3. Classify action as Type II under SEAR because this is an agricultural operation; 4. Send referrals to CFD, Town Engineer, ARC, LWRP, Land Preservation, Fire Marshall, Code Enforcement and the Building Department. 2 �Jl C_ Q 0) , JJ L tri.'(- � EC1v SUBMISSION TO PLANNING BOARD NOV 0 3 Z 16 1350 ALVAH'S LANE BARN-NFVS,LLC./WILLIAM ACKERMANN SOU10616TOvin Planning Board RE: PUBLIC HEARING To address the concerns raised at the public hearing on Oct.3,1 offer the following Information: • First, It is important to understand the operations of NFVS.We manage our own 23-acre Alvah's Lane site, plus vineyards that we effectively lease to grow fruit to sell,as well as vineyards owned by others.To do this,we use equipment such as sprayers,tractors,hedgers,netters, mowers and bins. In the growing season,from early spring through late fall,such as right now, the equipment is out in the fields. It Is moved around to the different sites as needed. We do not own a full set of equipment for each site.When not In use,It either remains on site,or will be In the barn.In the winter,none of the equipment is In use and It all needs to be under cover.This equipment represents a large Investment for the company,and it cannot be left outside.So far, we have been leasing barn space month-to-month,but this a temporary solution at best. • Size of barn—7,142 sq.ft.This barn,including the loft,is for storage only.The size is necessary to accommodate the equipment already owned by NFVS,as you can see on the schematic provided.The lot coverage relative to the size of the property is very small.The Alvah's Lane property was purchased primarily to build this barn for agricultural use,as well as to generate income from the vines.The equipment owned by NFVS Is typical for managing any vineyard,so even IF we were only managing our own vineyard on this site,we would STILL need this barn and the equipment.Any serious agricultural use on this 23-acre property requires a good-sized barn. Daily use of barn-There is no regular day-to-day activity taking place,such as processing.Our field workers will not park there,because they park at the vineyard sites where they work.We do not provide transportation.The field crew will only be there when they are working on the Alvah's Lane vineyard itself.NFVS Chemicals such as pesticides are delivered roughly every ten days In the summer,as needed,and used immediately,not stored In the barn.The truck and trailer will make one or two trips to the barn a week. So,there will not be much daily activity at the barn. • Style of barn—We are using a reputable barn-building company,and the style and colors are attractive,traditional,and In keeping with the rural nature of Alvah's Lane and the North Fork. • Location of barn—We considered all the possible locations on the property very carefully, Including impact on the neighbors,and this is the best site.We need a level,well-drained area that has safe access to Alvah's Lane.The selected location is level,with open visibility up and down Alvah's Lane to facilitate safe ingress and egress.This area also has a buffer of vineyard between It and the neighbors to the south and east,and is furthest from the neighbors to the north.The other sites are not as suitable.The northwest corner of the property has a steep slope, and poor visibility to the road, making ingress and egress extremely unsafe as I reported to the Planning Board In the previous meeting.Any other location for the barn would also be much closer and far more visible to the adjoining neighbors. MAILING PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ® SdOP.O.BoD 9ESS: DONALD J.WILCENSHI �� (Q Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATIpN: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR COUIY 1�ti` Southold,NY Telephone:631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD "�r-qof RME- D October 7, 2016 DEC 2 12016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 ZONING BOAR[)OF APPALS Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Public Hearing Held Open — Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Route 25 &Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: A Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 3, 2016 regarding the above-referenced Amended Site Plan. The Public Hearing was held open. To further help the Planning Board in their review of the application, please provide the following: 1. A floor plan schematic showing tractors and farm implements in building as discussed at the Public Hearing. Any space in the building not used for storage must be appropriately labeled on the plan; 2. Detailed drawings showing second floor and/or loft and their proposed use; 3. A list a of chemicals/herbicides/pesticides proposed to be stored in the building; 4. Number of truck trips per day/week for the proposed business and deliveries of supplies. The next Public Meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board will be held on Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. {/� o� MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ►� P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENS19 4 �t� ', Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS ' Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �1/� f (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR � U��,� F' Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtowYny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 1, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Information Proposed Amended Site Plan for: Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: To assist the Planning Board in their review of the application referenced above, please provide the following to this department at your earliest convenience: 1. List of all vineyards currently managed by NF Viticulture Services, LLC; including the location (address or SCTM#), total acreage and acreage of planted vines. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman ,Pq�, ,kCl E C d FE Nov.4,2016 NOV 0 4 20V' Planning Board Office Town of Southold 5au4i�s?id Torn Re: Request for Information,Ackermann Agricultural Barn,Alvah's Lane Vineyard. Manning Board 1 am in receipt of your letter dated Nov. 1,which arrived after I submitted information for the file on Nov.3,so please add this to the file also. North Fork Viticultural Services owns,leases and manages a number of vineyards.I grow and sell fruit from my own vineyard, plus grow and sell fruit from leased blocks at other vineyards,and manage/consult for non-leased areas of other vineyards. • Alvah's Lane Vineyard,1350 Alvah's Lane —I own 23 acres;9 acres in vines, 10 more acres to be planted in vines. • Clovis Point Vineyard, 1935 Main Road,Laurel—lease 1 acre, manage 6 acres. • Jason's Vineyard, 1785 Main Road,Laurel—lease 11 acres. • Anderson(Onabay)Vineyard, 1600 South Harbor Lane,Southold—lease and manage 20 acres (ratio between lease/manage varies by harvest,according to what fruit Onabay keeps for Its own wine,and what fruit I sell.) • Hounds Tree Estate, 2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck—lease and manage 27 acres,varies as above. • Pindar Vineyards,37645 Peconic—consulting manager for 223 acres,lease varies as above. Pindar Vineyards uses its own equipment; I oversee and direct the vineyard management program. • Lieb Vineyards, 13050 Oregon Road,Cutchogue—consulting manager plus seasonal spraying services for 90 acres. To summarize,the proposed barn is to store equipment that is used to manage my own Alvah's Lane vineyard, plus vineyards that I lease/manage. I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive;the equipment rotates around In season,and sits in storage in the winter.ALL of the equipment is also used on site to manage my own vines and property. The equipment will be stored at Alvah's Lane regardless,as I have purchased the property to be a working farm, not as a public service to provide scenery for the neighbors.Equipment in a storage barn will be far more attractive than equipment stored outside or under a large,plastic,round truss-type temporary shelter. Proper shelter will also prevent damage and deterioration to the equipment,which could cause unnecessary expense and create a potential hardship.The ongoing success of North Fork Viticultural Services and Alvah's Lane Vineyard relies very strongly on the equipment being in good working order.A working farm needs a barn. Under section 100-220 of the Southold Town Code,our farm practices are protected from interference by adjacent owners.It also declares agriculture to be desirable,and supported by Southold Town. Denying a barn to shelter essential equipment that is used on-site would be in direct conflict with this. Furthermore,the Land Preservation Committee,which deliberates on appropriate uses for preserved land, has already assessed our proposal and approved in writing the basic principle of having a good- sized storage barn on this site.Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code explicitly states that land In agricultural production shall include equipment storage buildings, and there is nothing In the law about development rights sold land that prohibits a storage barn.(see attached from Land Preservations� i mittee). Regards, William A n,NFVS, LLC. 19 F.C; ONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting 1 e GWEN GROOCOCK : Not major repairs like welding or if the engine breaks or anything like that no. It's not we don't have like a machine shop. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Because a prior plan I guess indicated that there was some sort of workshop, there was a bathroom now it is just storage. GWEN GROOCOCK : Well that's because again that original proposal the workshop was not going to be part of this building permit. That was going to be like a phase two because the house is going to be next to it and the idea was Bill wanted to be able to walk there to his workshop where all his tools are and putts around basically and that was not going to be a big thing. The actual storage area is going to be mostly empty in season and then full in the winter. I mean obviously if there's minor repairs that can be done with what he's got he's going to do them like in any barn but if there's going to be if you need to like you know pull out an engine or weld or something there are other people that are paid to do that. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Let me see if Ken do you have any questions I'm sorry Gerry wanted to ask a question first. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Gwen how are you? GWEN GROOCOCK : Good how are you? MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Good. I am of great difficulty in understanding how you move this equipment around so in the first question would be are you using any of the farmers equipment to do the spraying I mean you're telling me with all this stuff that you deal with you can't continuously move equipment around because it's a very involved process. GWEN GROOCOCK : There's a flatbed truck. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : I know so all the equipment is basically yours? GWEN GROOCOCK : Yes except for the people that we consult for like Pindar and Duck Walk. They have all their own equipment. We don't use our equipment in their fields. We consult for them. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Okay so you're not spraying anything for them, you're not doing anything for them other than the consulting aspect of it? GWEN GROOCOCK : Yes exactly their machines area their machines. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Okay but all the other parcels you're moving equipment your own equipment to get to these? 24 Michaelis, Jessica ? From: Cummings, Brian A. fr? {c' Sent: Friday, December 16,2016 2:45 PM i5 E L I To: Michaelis,Jessica Subject: FW:Site Plan Application update sol hold'fown Planniag Board From: Gwendolen Groocock fmailtoaaabusana@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:52 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Cc: Spiro, Melissa Subject: Re: Site Plan Application update Hi Brian, Thanks. We are in the city right now for the surgery,so we haven't the time to respond to this fully. However I note that there are very important points missing on this letter. In fact,this letter SIGNIFICANTLY misrepresents the actual situation.This Is a problem. KFVS does not only manage other vineyards,it leases other vineyard blocks and owns the fruit that results.This is no different than a farmer leasing land to grow row crops or anything else.Therefor NFVS directly grape farms FOR ITSELF many more than the eight owned acres currently in vines. We are also planting more vines at Alvah's in the areas that are conducive to them, i.e. not low-lying. Another IMPORTANT point that is missing is that about 13 acres of land on the Alvah's Lane property has been put into pasture grass and fenced for livestock.The equipment that has been used to remove brush,flatten the fields,disc up the land, remove rocks, install irrigation,mow, install fences etc. is once again the SAME NFVS equipment. We are in talks with 8Hands Farm and a Vermont breeder to add sheep, pigs and possibly cattle,depending on what Wr seems feasible.This hasn't been mentioned before because it seemed unnecessary as it didn't happen this year, as we had no winter shelter prepared and are still deciding which livestock and how many to start with. But the fences were changed from split-rail to post-and-wire mesh general livestock fence months ago, before the summer, in anticipation of sheep,pigs,cattle etc.that would not be contained by the split rail fencing that came with WTthe property, lien we do move ahead with livestock,we will also need appropriate shelter for the animals. e Planning Board and ZBA are welcome to view the property to see that it has already been extensively graded and seeded to pasture,and that the new general livestock fences in fact exist. The point is that NFVS is actively farming ALL OF THE ACRES of the Alvah's Lane property,AS WELL as leasing vineyard blocks. ALL THE EQUIPMENT IS USED FOR THIS. This land was purchased to be farmed and we would like an appropriate BARN to store the necessary agricultural equipment. The site is not and will not be used for any purposes not allowed under A/C zoned preserved land. So the real question that the Planning Board should be asking is-given that we have an undisputed right to an ag storage barn on the property, do they have the right to decide what is the appropriate amount of equipment for us to own, and therefore the size of the barn? Do they have the power to decide how big a storage barn or a livestock barn should be? Off the top of my head, I'd say probably not. In addition,of course, NFVS manages and consults for other vineyards. In summary,this is NOT a zoning issue because we are farming on ag land. These points MUST be made in a clarification letter to the ZBA. 1 The current letter makes it sound like we only actively farm 8 of our owned/leased acres for ourselves, and this is NOT true. lease amend this ASAP and let me know immediately when it has been done. so,we request to be put on the work session schedule with the Planning Board as soon as possible. We also request to be put on the work session with the ZBA to ensure that we are satisfied that they have accurate information. We are also reaching out to Al Krupski,the Farm Bureau and Tony Palumbo, so that they are aware that the Planning Board appears to be seeking a ruling from the ZBA whether an ag storage barn is a legitimate use on A/C zoned property, or whether our business is legitimately ag, or whatever they are struggling with. If it becomes necessary,we will also retain legal council. Thanks, Gwen Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16,2016,at 11:45 AM,Cummings, Brian A.<brian.cummings@town.southold.ny.us>wrote: Good morning Gwen, Attached, please see the recent correspondence from the Planning Board to the ZBA regarding the H subject site plan application currently before the Planning Board. I wanted to reach out to you specifically to confirm that the site plan application kAQJ scheduled on the Planning Board's work session agenda for this Monday, December 19`h,as I had mentioned to Bill would be a possibility. Please let me know if you have any questions and pass along my best to Bill as he recovers from his shoulder surgery. Sincerely, Brian Brian A. Cummings, Planner Southold Town Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: brian.cummines@town.southold.nv.us <I 000-102.4-6.l.tif> z Ec Hy k Nov.4,2016 NOV 0 4 100 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Soum&Town Re: Request for Information,Ackermann Agricultural Barn,Alvah's Lane Vineyard. Planning Board I am in receipt of your letter dated Nov. 1,which arrived after I submitted information for the file on Nov.3,so please add this to the file also. North Fork Viticultural Services owns,leases and manages a number of vineyards.I grow and sell fruit from my own vineyard, plus grow and sell fruit from leased blocks at other vineyards,and manage/consult for non-leased areas of other vineyards. • Alvah's Lane Vineyard, 1350 Alvah's Lane —I own 23 acres;9 acres in vines, 10 more acres to be planted in vines. • Clovis Point Vineyard, 1935 Main Road, Laurel—lease 1 acre, manage 6 acres. • Jason's Vineyard, 1785 Main Road,Laurel—lease 11 acres. • Anderson (Onabay)Vineyard, 1600 South Harbor Lane,Southold—lease and manage 20 acres (ratio between lease/manage varies by harvest,according to what fruit Onabay keeps for its own wine, and what fruit I sell.) • Hounds Tree Estate, 2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck—lease and manage 27 acres,varies as above. • Pindar Vineyards,37645 Peconic—consulting manager for 223 acres,lease varies as above. Pindar Vineyards uses its own equipment; I oversee and direct the vineyard management program. • Lieb Vineyards, 13050 Oregon Road,Cutchogue—consulting manager plus seasonal spraying services for 90 acres. To summarize,the proposed barn is to store equipment that is used to manage my own Alvah's Lane vineyard, plus vineyards that I lease/manage. I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive;the equipment rotates around in season,and sits in storage in the winter.ALL of the equipment Is also used on site to manage my own vines and property. The equipment will be stored at Alvah's Lane regardless,as I have purchased the property to be a working farm, not as a public service to provide scenery for the neighbors.Equipment in a storage barn will be far more attractive than equipment stored outside or under a large,plastic,round truss-type temporary shelter. Proper shelter will also prevent damage and deterioration to the equipment,which could cause unnecessary expense and create a potential hardship.The ongoing success of North Fork Viticultural Services and Alvah's Lane Vineyard relies very strongly on the equipment being in good working order.A working farm needs a barn. Under section 100-220 of the Southold Town Code,our farm practices are protected from interference by adjacent owners. It also declares agriculture to be desirable,and supported by Southold Town. Denying a barn to shelter essential equipment that is used on-site would be in direct conflict with this. Furthermore,the Land Preservation Committee,which deliberates on appropriate uses for preserved land, has already assessed our proposal and approved in writing the basic principle of having a good- sized storage barn on this site.Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code explicitly states that land in agricultural production shall include equipment storage buildings,and there is nothing in the law about development rights sold land that prohibits a storage barn. (see attached from Land /� Preservation C mittee). ��rj _j j Regards, ' // RF_C:E-1•lEi William A NFVS, LLC. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I � �-; C; I `f October 3, Chairman Wilcenski: So there are three on each side? William Ackermann: Yes, plus windows. James H. Rich III: The elevation shows four? Heather Lanza: Or five? William Ackermann: There is a sliding door in the middle so that I can drive through and then close it up. gh it Chairman Wilcenski: So there are actually five doors? William Ackermann: If you want to count the sliding door, yea. Chairman Wilcenski: Okay, alright we have a couple of questions. What are the intentions for the proposed use of the land? William Ackermann: The land itself or the barn? Chairman Wilcenski: The land. William Ackermann: The land itself, it's a vineyard now and it's going to stay y a Chairman Wilcenski: Is it your vineyard? William Ackermann: Yeah. Chairman Wilcenski: Okay. William Ackermann: There's roughly 8 acres of vineyard, the rest of thearcel 22.8, is not conducive to putting a vineyard on. So it'll just be grass. p , its Chairman Wilcenski: So 8 acres of planted vines and 22 acres of- William Ackermann: Its 22.8 total, of which 8 are vines, and then there is buffer too, I don't know how you want to count that. Its 22.8 acres in total. area Chairman Wilcenski: Okay. Anybody else have any questiojj;�? Heather? Heather Lanza: I do. There are just a couple things we want to have for our recor One of the questions was we see that the company is called North d. t Services, and that is actually the address of it, do you intend to run the slin slsure o this building? out of William Ackermann: It's where I am going to store the tractors at. 0 re: North Fork Viticultural Services agricultural storage facility(barn) application on DRS AC land sent by the Southold Town Planning Board to the Zoning Board of Appeals for interpretation as to whether this proposed structure is an agricultural storage facility, or a "contractor's yard."The outcome of this determination will potentially impact the whole of � I3 RECI:fUEp Southold Town's agricultural community, and any future new agricultural businesses. BACKGROUND: �' �` d�7 The definition of agricultural production under Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of thezONING BOARp OFApPj Southold Town Code is, "Agricultural production shall mean the production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock and livestock products, but not land or portions thereof used for the processing or retail merchandising of such crops, livestock or livestock products. Land used in agricultural production shall also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock barns,irrigation systems and any other structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes." In the Deed of Development Rights contract(Feb. 5, 1999) in which Southold Town purchased the development rights of this property, it states that future owners"shall only use the premises—for the purpose of agricultural production..." William Ackermann, owner of North Fork Viticultural Services(NFVS), is a longtime North Fork resident and grape-grower. He has an amended site plan application before the Southold Town Planning Board to build a 7,142 sq.foot agricultural equipment and livestock supply barn on his 23-acre farm on Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-102-4-6.1), purchased in March 2016.The parcel is zoned AC,development rights sold (DRS)to Southold Town. It has 8 acres previously planted in grapes, and about 13 acres in two new pasture fields(previously overgrown) and two pre-existing paddocks. In total,about 21 acres are being actively farmed. NFVS is a vineyard Maria ern and.co,sultancyy-company with a number of clients on the North Fork. Some vineyards are managed with NFVS equipment; some are consulted to and use their own equipment. NFVS also grows its own fruit on the equivalent of about 50 leased acres, and on the 8 acres it owns at Alvah's Lane. Mr. Ackermann has also improved the farm for livestock.Split rail horse fences have been replaced with general livestock post and mesh wire fences.The north and south fields have been cleared of brush, graded,disked and planted in cover crop and pasture grass. Irrigation lines have been installed. Half the perimeter on the north and east side was already in deer fencing at the time of purchase;the remaining east and south sides are now in deer fence also. The west side along Alvah's Lane is open,except at the location of the 4-foot livestock fence. The barn is proposed for a clear area between Alvah's Lane and the front of the vines. It is intended to house NFVS equipment, such as tractors,sprayers, mowers and grape bins, as well as supplies for the livestock project. It could also partially become shelter for livestock, if sheep RECEIVEG JAN 12 2017 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS are included.The concept right now is to raise a small number of sheep'and cattle for non- —703-1 commercial use at first,to assess the feasibility of raising livestock commercially. When the barn proposal was first submitted,the livestock project was discussed with the planning department, but not at length, because the Alvah's Lane property had just been bought and plans were not firm at that time. Also, given the initially positive feedback NFVS got from the Planning Department, it did not seem necessary to provide further justification for a barn on a farm. To be clear about the intent and the timeline, livestock fencing was installed in the early summer of 2016, and the grading, disking, seeding, irrigation lines and mowing done in over the summer and fall (with Mr. Ackermann's own equipment), long before the Planning Board's public hearing in November. In fact, Planning Board member Marry Sidor and Mr.Ackermann had a casual conversation about Mr.Ackermann's plans for finding a farm to purchase and raising cattle back in 2014. It is also important to understand that the equipment to be stored in the barn is ALL used on the Alvah's Lane vineyard and farm. It is also used on the leased vineyards, and to provide N services to the contract vineyards. NFVS does NOT own separate sets of equipment for different locations.That would be prohibitively expensive, in the millions of dollars. Managing a vineyard of any size (by North Fork standards) requires the same equipment; more acreage simply means more time spent working. NFVS is a relatively small company compared to much larger vineyard-management and farming operations in the area.The operations of NFVS and the livestock program depend on proper storage of the equipment and supplies.That is why NFVS wants a barn. A diagram showing equipment in a winter storage configuration has been provided to the planning department.The barn also contains a 1,020 storage loft, for grape bins and feed. There are NO plans for retail, manufacturing, or anything that is not allowed on DRS AC land, according to Southold Town's own code. ACTIONS: The Land Preservation Department reviewed the application and approved it on March 7, 2016.This department exists in part to ensure that development rights sold land is used appropriately. Planning department staff at first said the application seemed straightforward. However, at the public hearing in October, some non-farming neighbors protested the barn,saying it was not in keeping with their neighborhood.They compared it to an "industrial site," said that they thought it is too large, complained that brush and trees had been cleared, and called the deer fence reminiscent of a "gulag." NFVS pointed out at the public hearing that there is nothing in the Southold Town code that limits, determines or uses a formula to dictate the size of a barn on DRS AC land, nor the March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting DIANE CROSSER : Again the inaccuracies eight acres or is it twenty two that are being used? The original application calls for a small bath but then when questioned by Mr. Wilsinski electric or water and he said no water and there was a question about that no water only for the pumps no bathroom again the inconsistencies just speak out over and over again. Again these pictures of someone coming on to everyone's property, taking advantage, trespassing and I did ask the Town Attorney's office about that and they said it was a civil matter that they would not be able to help me with that. Again, I ask you to look at this not only for the implication for this property. If you allow this Pandora 's Box will be opened for anyone and everyone to say I can run a business from my home from my property. Satur farm will pale in comparison with what happens with this. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Thank you. Member Horning who had to leave has asked that you just identify which your property is on this tax map. DIANE CROSSER : I have four copies you need four copies? CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : It saves us in making copies if you can so kind as to do it already because we have five board members. While all of this is being passed around and so on first I want to thank all of you for being here and for your testimony. Oh did you have something you wanted to add? Sorry I didn't mean to cut anyone off. GWEN GROOCOCK : Hi I'm sorry I've been running late I just came from Riverhead. My name is Gwen Groocock my partner Bill Ackermann is the owner of the property. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Wait hold on I'm sorry wait one second cause I can't hear while they're talking to each other, Gerry could you share that information with the rest of the Board? MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Surely, I'm just trying to he's call it in Leslie. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Okay fine. Please proceed. GWEN GROOCOCK : Okay again hi I'm Gwen Groocock. My partner Bill Ackermann is the owner of the property. I'm happy to answer any questions or clarify some things. We had submitted a letter I think it should be in the file that which you probably have read by now stating our position and what we are trying to do so beyond that if there are any other issues that have come up we are as we stated in the letter in fact farming the whole of the property. The vineyard equipment is the same vineyard equipment that we're using on our own vineyard as we use elsewhere. It is not multiple sets of the same equipment at different places to be stored in a giant barn. So, even if we weren't servicing any other vineyards we would still have vineyard equipment and it would still want to go into a barn. As far as the pasture land and March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting everything else we are in fact wanting to put in cattle. That's going to we're not entirely sure yet how much room that's going to take in some form of a barn but that is part of that parcel. The way I guess the way I'm trying to understand it is that you have the twenty three acre piece and farming that occurs on that in this case its pasture plus vineyard. So, theoretically a barn that serves that use would be something acceptable in that situation. If for example it was the same piece of land and we were not farming it at all and we wanted to build a large barn to do other things elsewhere. I would imagine that would probably not be acceptable on preserved land. I feel that we are somewhere in between. It's kind of a hybrid because we're farming that property in two different ways. We also lease land and grown grapes which are similar to a lot of other farmers do sod farmers and some of the vineyards and everything else. Then we also have some clients where it's their land and their grapes and we service it in other words picking, spraying etc. So all these things are done the equipment that is owned is the same equipment and I'm not entirely sure how else to characterize the business. It does seem to fall into a kind of a new category as far as what agriculture is. I don't think it's unusual historically for farmers like the sod farmers provide seeding services for example for cover crops for any number of other farmers crop farmers and all the rest of it with their equipment that then goes into barns and if it's on preserved land there's a lot of people now have these days it would be the same situation. I feel that it would be putting a lot of people on the wrong side of the law really if you were not allowed to move your farm equipment off a piece of property and do things elsewhere you see so another thing I'd like to point out is that parcels of land like this this is a preserved piece with no building lot. We've actually purchased the one third of an acre next to it which is a small building lot to build a house our own house so we're certainly not planning on having some heaving mess going on right next door to our own selves but this piece by itself has no building lot on it. It's not really attractive as any kind of a I don't know somebody from out of town for example it's really only attractive to somebody who can farm it. In this case a vineyard manager. It's the ideal spot obviously for a barn that holds vineyard equipment. Now if the issue is that the barn is too big as presently proposed which is a completely separate issue as to whether the use is allowed or not and I understand but what size barn do you feel would serve that property and then that way be well within the intent of I guess AG only on development rights sold if that's what the issue is? So, I think there's a couple of questions it's not quite getting to the issue of it. Is this too big? If we show you which tractors are used only on that property can we have a barn that covers those? You see it's like there's got to be some way of approaching this question to provide an answer that ends up with that thing being farmed properly and the equipment being stored properly so I'm not sure what that is. As far as the use on it we've tried to say this a number of times, in season the equipment is wherever it is working okay this is not a like a mechanics place or anything like that. We're not tractor fixers we have other people fix the tractors when that has to happen. There's not any kind of intensive use going on there on a day to day basis. It's literally storage. 201 March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting head. I think it's roughly about fifty tons of grapes are ours last season that's how it worked out. 50, whatever else beyond that would be owned by the land owners themselves. If you want the actual breakdown to say how much you know how much is like us farming and how much is us farming for somebody else I can get you those that breakdown for sure but we'd have to go into the computer and get the charts and you know. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Can you give me a rough idea of the annual income for your agricultural businesses we'll pluralize it. GWEN GROOCOCK : It's just the one business. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Okay so about what percentage are you actively engaged in farming the Alvahs Lane property? GWEN GROOCOCK : Yeah absolutely the eight acres of grapes plus the pasture land and as I said in the letter we've changed it to livestock fence. We've planted pasture grass and we are pretty much settled on cows. We were going to do sheep for a little bit but that's CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well certainly you wouldn't need that amount of equipment for viticulture for eight acres if you were just doing your own eight acres particularly since the rest of the acreage is now being proposed for cattle which would require a different kind of situation so then most of that equipment is going to be used on other property whether you are leasing it or you're providing services for others. GWEN GROOCOCK : We tried to explain this to the Planning Board as well. We provided them with schematics showing how the equipment would fit in the barn. Now all the equipment that we own there's probably a couple of machines that you know a couple of the smaller tractors around the same size are used for the vineyards so if they need to tend to Alvahs Lane that's where they're going to be. We don't again we don't have multiple sets of these you know five hundred thousand dollars pieces of machinery at each of our sites. They move around so again if you want exactly for example the eight acres what precise machines were used this passed growing season and is that all of our own equipment or is that seventy five percent of it or whatever then that we can try to do that breakdown as well. It's just that a vineyard will take the same equipment it's just if it's larger it will take more time to go up and down the rows. You don't have like two giant three giant sprayers all going at once in a big vineyard unless you're not on the North Fork anyway, CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Let's think what else, did I hear you correctly that you said that no repair of equipment is done will be done in this proposed storage building? March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting because we're trying to he wants to decide between Belted Galloways and Red Devin's. We're getting input on that. I'm reluctant in getting into livestock a little bit. I think it's a lot more work than Bill might think it is but we have good friends that are livestock growers out here who are helping to you know help us understand the process so I guess then the next question would be how many head of cattle can we foresee maybe and it's a two year cycle so over the next three or four, five years so say it's half a dozen. So then I guess we'd have to find out what equipment and supplies are would pertain to that and add that to just the eight acre vineyard and that would be the size of the barn so I think yea I mean absolutely. Maybe we can just go look at somebody else who's got a comparable sized farm and see what their barn looks like. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Again site specific. GWEN GROOCOCK : Yea site specific. I mean I can tell you a thousand square feet is probably way too small you know is seven too big probably. That would you know that would be ideal but it is also large for sure so somewhere in there. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : I guess what the question the probative question here is if on development rights sold land you were farming whether it's agricultural, whether it's viticulture or livestock it's still farming according to our code what's the equipment and the scale you would need? I don't think the real question is about farming the subject property the question is using that scale and number of pieces of equipment elsewhere throughout the town on development rights sold property housing it there. So, that's kind of I think the essence of the question that the Planning Board has put before us whether we like it or not we have to grapple with it so is there anything else that's what I'm going to propose actually Ken and Gerry that we adjourn this to the Special Meeting. There's a lot of things that have been submitted to us in writing. We also I want to have a complete printout we have to give it to our transcriber. I want to be able to review the Planning Board's public hearing transcripts and our own and I think you should have an opportunity to see what's been submitted in writing in case you and Mr. Ackermann would like to respond in writing to any of them or that you would like to provide additional testimony. By adjourning to the Special Meeting in two weeks we all have some time to take a deep breath, look at everything and see where we need to go with this. If at the time we have no further questions or we have no further request from anyone we'll probably close it and then we will have from that point sixty two days in which to make a determination. We generally don't take that long you know but this is complicated and it has potential precedent setting you know component to it so we want to be extremely cautious and careful and thorough and open minded so we need to digest a lot of stuff. Yes please go ahead. GWEN GROOCOCK : I just want to say on that precedent setting aspect from looking at it it's quite it could cut both ways really. Setting a precedent that this is not agriculture could be very 27 March 2, 2017 Regular Meeting head. I think it's roughly about fifty tons of grapes are ours last season that's how it worked out. So, whatever else beyond that would be owned by the land owners themselves. If you want the actual breakdown to say how much you know how much is like us farming and how much is us farming for somebody else I can get you those that breakdown for sure but we'd have to go into the computer and get the charts and you know. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Can you give me a rough idea of the annual income for your agricultural businesses we'll pluralize it. GWEN GROOCOCK : It's just the one business. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Okay so about what percentage are you actively engaged in farming the Alvahs Lane property? GWEN GROOCOCK : Yeah absolutely the eight acres of grapes plus the pasture land and as I said in the letter we've changed it to livestock fence. We've planted pasture grass and we are pretty much settled on cows. We were going to do sheep for a little bit but that's CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Well certainly you wouldn't need that amount of equipment for viticulture for eight acres if you were just doing your own eight acres particularly since the rest of the acreage is now being proposed for cattle which would require a different kind of situation so then most of that equipment is going to be used on other property whether you are leasing it or you're providing services for others. GWEN GROOCOCK : We tried to explain this to the Planning Board as well. We provided them with schematics showing how the equipment would fit in the barn. Now all the equipment that we own there's probably a couple of machines that you know a couple of the smaller tractors around the same size are used for the vineyards so if they need to tend to Alvahs Lane that's where they're going to be. We don't again we don't have multiple sets of these you know five hundred thousand dollars pieces of machinery at each of our sites. They move around so again if you want exactly for example the eight acres what precise machines were used this passed growing season and is that all of our own equipment or is that seventy five percent of it or whatever then that we can try to do that breakdown as well. It's just that a vineyard will take the same equipment it's just if it's larger it will take more time to go up and down the rows. You don't have like two giant three giant sprayers all going at once in a big vineyard unless you're not on the North Fork anyway. CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Let's think what else, did I hear you correctly that you said that no repair of equipment is done will be done in this proposed storage building? 231 March 2,2017 Regular meewir, or repairs like welding or if the engine breaks or anyt' Not GWEN GROOCOCon,t have like a machine shop. no. It's not we d CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN Because a prior plan I guess indicated that there wa workshop,there was a bathroom now it is just storage• proposal the workshop was not again that original prop base two because the GWEN GROOCOCK : Well that's because ag going to be like a p art of this building permit. That was g g going to be p idea was Bill wanted to be able to walk there be a big g g house is going to be next to it and the tts around basically and that was not going workshop where all his tools are and p empty in season and then full in the winter. e area is going to be mostly of he's going to do thing.The actual storage pull out an engine there's minor repairs that can be done to hke you know 1 mean obviously if going to be if you need them like in any barn but a there's g that are paid to do that. or weld or something there are other people do ou have any questions I'm sorry Gerry wanted CHAIRPERSON WEISMAN : Let me see if Ken Y to ask a question first. MEMBER GOEHRINGER :Gwen how are you? GWEN GROOCOCK : Good how are you? how You move this teat difficulty in understanding ment Good. I am of g yo using any of the farmers equip MEMBER GOEHRINGER i question would be are y you deal with you can't equipment around so in the first q me with all this stuff that 1 mean you're telling involved process. to do the spraying continuously move equipment around because it's a very GWEN GROOCOCK :There's a flatbed truck. MEMBER GOEHRINGER : I know so all the equipment is basically yours? that we consult for like Pindar and eD o Duck for Yes except for the people GWEN GROOCOCK : equipment m their fields. The have all their own equipment. We don't use our eq p Y them. so anything for them, you're not doing you're not spraying MEMBER GOEHRINGER : Okay Y anything for them other than the consulting aspect of it? GWEN G ROOCOCK :Yes exactly their machines area their machines. our own MEMBER GOEHRINGER Okay but all the other parcels you'fe moving equipment y equipment to get to these? - "-- 24 . What Does LLC Mean on the End of a Company Name? by Lauren Miller,studioD LLC is the abbreviation for limited liability company.LLCs are relatively new business structures that combine the features of a corporation and a partnership,specifically the tax benefits of partnerships and the liability protections of corporation.State governments regulate LLCs,and restrictions on LLC names and abbreviations vary from state to state. 1 File an LLC application Fit your business needs with the right LLC package hfto:/Aroww.lepalzoom.com/limited-liability-companv History Business structures similar to LLCs have been in use in Europe since the nineteenth century. However,LLCs in the United States did not appear until the late 1970s.The state of Wyoming i" enacted the first LLC law in 1977,providing the first legal definition of the structure.Other states were slow to create LLC laws as they waited for the Internal Revenue Service to decide on how to treat LLCs for tax purposes.LLCs can now choose to be taxed as sole proprietorships,partnerships LLC naming conventions vary from or corporations. state to state. Limited Liability Related Articles The"limited liability"in LLCs refers to the fact that owners,called members,are protected from personal liability for the business actions of the company.Consequently,if the LLC is sued or runs Wiat does LLC Mean for a up debt,the personal assets of members cannot,in most cases,be used to satisfy claims from ConlDany? plaintiffs or creditors.This is a feature that LLC members have in common with the shareholders of corporations.However,liability is"limited"because members are not immune to suits involving civil UVnat Does a Limited Liability wrongdoing,also known as a tort. Company Mean? Abbreviations and Variations Each state has rules regarding how the words"limited liability company"can be represented in a \Afnat Does LLC Mean in a company name.These rules are generally explained in the"Name"sections of a state's LLC law. Business? Generally,business owners can use the words"limited liability company"or"limited company"after the LLC's unique name.Some states allow"limited"to be abbreviated at"Ltd."Commonly allowed abbreviations include"L.L.C,""L.C.,""LC"and"LLC" Restrictions States have restrictions on what type of companies may be defined as an LLC,including banks,trusts,credit unions and insurance companies.Consequently,LLCs are prohibited from using words in the company name that imply the firm is conducting business as a restricted type.Depending on the state,restrictions may also include LLCs that provide professional services such as doctors,therapists and acupuncturists. References & Resources university of Wisconsin Center for Coxa ia:«s:Thome ABCs of LLCsihtto:/Aywvi.uwvcc.yrisc.edu/into/farrier/Iare20Ol/abc.litrnl7 BuSill ass.go;r Limited Liability Company fLLC?f97ttp:1/btcsiness.aovfrevister�ncorporation/ilc/� PS.aov:Limited Liability Comr,any iLLC]�I ttQ:lA�w4y.irs.nov/buslnesseslsn�aEi/articlelQ .i ��J8277,OU.htir�ll About the Author Lauren Miller has more than 10 years of experience as a writer and editor.Her articles on technology,small business and legal topics have appeared in magazines,newspapers and trade journals.She has a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy and is an avid gardener and sports fan. Photo Credits Jupitedmages/Photos.com/Getty Images Next Article: What Does LLC Mean for a Company? W`- Michaelis, Jessica V--)3 MZ �From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Wednesday,January 04, 2017 9:18 AM To: Michaelis, Jessica Subject: FW: 1350 Alvah's Lane . S:iifl'iold-bmi i'@tn fiia J Il Bard From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 9:18 AM To: Cummings, Brian A. Cc: Collins, Michael Subject: 1350 Alvah's Lane Brian With regard to the Site plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn please consider the following: The Engineering Department will need a better defined/detailed Stormwater Plan to review. Compacted dirt surfaces are not recommended but will still require drainage. Elevated grades around the proposed building will also change the natural course of stormwater, This fact must be considered by the plan and additional drainage will be required as a result. A phasing plan will also be required to ensure a clean site during construction. Therefore at this time I am requesting a more complete Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP)for review„ If the applicant's engineer has any questions regarding this matter please have them contact my office. Thank you! James A. Richter, R.A. Stormwater Manager Office of the Engineer Town of Southold, New York Stormwater Management Control Plan Website: �tl�.:�f�-��,��^��'soufliol 11 va;e � Office: 631-765-1560 Cell: 631-926-9430 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. I. Michaelis, Jessica ,..-x, K l From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:45 PM � To: Michaelis,Jessica Subject: FW: Site Plan Application update From: Gwendolen Groocock [mailto:taabusana@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:52 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Cc: Spiro, Melissa Subject: Re: Site Plan Application update Hi Brian, Thanks. We are in the city right now for the surgery, so we haven't the time to respond to this fully. However I note that there are very important points missing on this letter. In fact, this letter SIGNIFICANTLY misrepresents the actual situation.This is a problem. NFVS does not only manage other vineyards, it leases other vineyard blocks and owns the fruit that results.This is no different than a farmer leasing land to grow row crops or anything else. Therefor NFVS directly grape farms FOR ITSELF many more than the eight owned acres currently in vines. We are also planting more vines at Alvah's in the areas that are conducive to them, i.e. not low-lying. Another IMPORTANT point that is missing is that about 13 acres of land on the Alvah's Lane property has been put into pasture grass and fenced for livestock.The equipment that has been used to remove brush, flatten the fields, disc up the land, remove rocks, install irrigation, mow, install fences etc. is once again the SAME NFVS equipment. We are in talks with 8Hands Farm and a Vermont breeder to add sheep, pigs and possibly cattle, depending on what seems feasible.This hasn't been mentioned before because it seemed unnecessary as it didn't happen this year, as we had no winter shelter prepared and are still deciding which livestock and how many to start with. But the fences were changed from split-rail to post-and-wire mesh general livestock fence months ago, before the summer, in anticipation of sheep, pigs, cattle etc.that would not be contained by the split rail fencing that came with the property. When we do move ahead with livestock, we will also need appropriate shelter for the animals. The Planning Board and ZBA are welcome to view the property to see that it has already been extensively graded and seeded to pasture, and that the new general livestock fences in fact exist. The point is that NFVS is actively farming ALL OF THE ACRES of the Alvah's Lane property, AS WELL as leasing vineyard blocks. ALL THE EQUIPMENT IS USED FOR THIS. This land was purchased to be farmed and we would like an appropriate BARN to store the necessary agricultural equipment. The site is not and will not be used for any purposes not allowed under A/C zoned preserved land. So the real question that the Planning Board should be asking is -given that we have an undisputed right to an ag storage barn on the property, do they have the right to decide what is the appropriate amount of equipment for us to own, and therefore the size of the barn? Do they have the power to decide how big a storage barn or a livestock barn should be? Off the top of my head, I'd say probably not. In addition, of course, NFVS manages and consults for other vineyards. In summary,this is NOT a zoning issue because we are farming on ag land. These points MUST be made in a clarification letter to the ZBA. 1 The current letter makes it sound like we only actively farm 8 of our owned/leased acres for ourselves, and this is NOT true. Please amend this ASAP and let me know immediately when it has been done. Also, we request to be put on the work session schedule with the Planning Board as soon as possible. We also request to be put on the work session with the ZBA to ensure that we are satisfied that they have accurate information. We are also reaching out to Al Krupski, the Farm Bureau and Tony Palumbo, so that they are aware that the Planning Board appears to be seeking a ruling from the ZBA whether an ag storage barn is a legitimate use on A/C zoned property, or whether our business is legitimately ag, or whatever they are struggling with. If it becomes necessary,we will also retain legal council. Thanks, Gwen Sent from my iPhone On Dec 16, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Cummings, Brian A. <brian.cummings@town.southold.nv.us>wrote: Good morning Gwen, Attached, please see the recent correspondence from the Planning Board to the ZBA regarding the subject site plan application currently before the Planning Board. I wanted to reach out to you specifically to confirm that the site plan application is not scheduled on the Planning Board's work session agenda for this Monday, December 19`h, as I had mentioned to Bill would be a possibility. Please let me know if you have any questions and pass along my best to Bill as he recovers from his shoulder surgery. Sincerely, Brian Brian A. Cummings, Planner Southold Town Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: brian.cummings@town.southold.nv.us <1000-102.-4-6.l.tif5 2 Michaelis, Jessica From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:45 PM To: Michaelis,Jessica Subject: FW: Site Plan Application update From: Gwendolen Groocock [mailto:taabusana@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 1:56 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Cc: Spiro, Melissa Subject: Re: Site Plan Application update Hi again. Please also amend the inaccurate statement that our business model is based in managing land not owned by us.That is wrong. Our business model is a combination of farming our own 23 acres in grapes and pasture,farming our grapes on leased land AND managing vineyards owned by others. Quite frankly,this letter should not have gone to the ZBA without ensuring that it relays the whole picture,which it currently does not. Again,thanks. Gwen Sent from my Whone On Dec 16, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Cummings, Brian A. <brian.cummings@town.southold.nv.us>wrote: Good morning Gwen, Attached, please see the recent correspondence from the Planning Board to the ZBA regarding the subject site plan application currently before the Planning Board. I wanted to reach out to you specifically to confirm that the site plan application is not scheduled on the Planning Board's work session agenda for this Monday, December 19th, as I had mentioned to Bill would be a possibility. Please let me know if you have any questions and pass along my best to Bill as he recovers from his shoulder surgery. Sincerely, Brian Brian A. Cummings, Planner Southold Town Planning Department 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 1 P a MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i � ��W� P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS �r'� -' Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III °; � � � �� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR � , �'' ,l Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, ZBA Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From. Donald J. Wilcenski, ChairmanV Members of the Planning Board o Y Date: December 2, 2016 Re: Interpretation of Proposed Use of Barn Proposed Amended Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC The Planning Board is currently reviewing a Site Plan Application, referenced above, for an 8,162 sq. ft. barn (7,142 sq. ft. footprint and 1,020 sq. ft. attic storage) proposed for agricultural equipment storage. The fact that the barn is located on land on which the Town owns development rights for agricultural uses has raised the question of what qualifies as agricultural storage. In this case, the applicant states that the large size of the barn is required to store their vineyard management equipment, and that their business is to manage hundreds of acres of vineyard located elsewhere. They also state that the amount of equipment they need to store would be the same to manage only the 8-acre vineyard on the subject property. The Planning Board is requesting an interpretation of the use of this barn as a base of operations for a business that manages vineyards in other locations in addition to the eight acres of vines on this property. During the Public Hearing, it was questioned whether the use for this building is a commercial use or contractors yard rather than an agricultural use, given that the business model is based on managing vineyards that are not owned by the applicant. Ackermann Agricultural Barn Page 2 December 2, 2016 The applicant has provided information regarding the equipment they propose to store here, and included a schematic to demonstrate the need for the size of the barn. See attached. All information pertaining to this application can be found in Laserfiche and Municity. Please let us know if you need any additional information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Encls. Site Plan Site Plan Application Schematic (showing storage of equipment) First and Second Floor Plans William C. Ackerman and Planning Board Correspondence p nEV , F;� lllr 5 71 ANT MAIN STREET II � HO LONG ISLAND rvERWE 1),NEW YOkK t 190 3 1) 369-3300 1 PINE'BARRENS b:(63 1) 36£3-3389 S O C I_E _T Y 'VXIWWPINEBARRENS.ORC, , Ms. Heather Lanza Planning Director Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Building, „ 54375 Route 25 P.Q. Box 1179 1 Southold, NY 11971 November 17, 2016, Dear IVIS. Lanza, The Long'lsland Pine Barrens Society writes in opposition to the proposed development, described as Ackerman Agriculture Barn and Agriculture Pump House TMN 102;-4-6.1 in Cutchogue.' f There is no dispute that the'development rights to this parcel were sold to the Town of Southold in 1999. J It is not germane that they were sold to the town,by a previous owner.. 1 It is also clear that the proposed use does not constitute permissible agricultural use. The applicable f' standard reads: "accessory to active uses on and cannot he,used for general,storage or warehousing." The applicant's use is intended to involve off-site business use of a general service nature. i Especially concerning is the precedent that would be set, were the usage to be permitted., Southold's , Purchase of Development Rights program°enjoys an excellent reputation for protection of farmland, fertile soils and rural tradition. Approval of the Ackerman application would permanently undermine this noble program. 1 Thank yo'u for your consideration. Sincerely, 9 Richard Amper PC �r/ i/ ri 5 SUper�l$ Scott Russel �/ or ,- v r„ r C%ouncilman William f�uland 20� % %ir /' �j' ori rr i, l Councilwoman Lolls Evans rr f Councilman Jill Doerty, Councilman James D�iizlo !' ' / g l Councilman'Robert Ghosio r, / IR / j f v Jr; Lanza, Heather ' L, _ ��,rt a From: Maril Sawastynowicz <sawasty@gmail.com> I Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:44 PM To: Lanza, Heather Subject: Ackerman/NFVS warehouse garage - u�Qa�giism To Town of Southold Planning Board, Regarding Mr Ackerman/NFVS; This is preserved farmland in Agricultural Conservation Zoned land.The proposed 7,140 ft warehouse building is to be used to store equipment for Ackerman/NFVS vineyard management company. He purchased this preserved farmland for less than$24,000 per acre.An un preserved acre on Alvah's Lane is priced at $165,000 per acre. Preserved farmland is much cheaper for a reason, it has restrictions and is intended to remain mostly farmland with possibly a sizable barn to support the intended farm. Nowhere does it say preserved farmland is to be used as a warehouse depot to maintain hundreds of acres of other vineyards or farms. NFVS is trying to use cheaper preserved land for expensive warehouse land use. Please deny this request and maintain the integrity of preserved farmland on the North Fork. Sincerely, Maril Sawastynowicz 1 Lanza, Heather From: Nancy Sawastynowicz <sowhatstoknow@gmail.com> � Vu Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:56 PM of To: Lanza, Heather ' Subject: Public Comment for the record on the Ackermann/ NFVS file n j To TOS Planning Board, I am forwarding a copy of my friend's letter to Suffolk Times Editor. Please add it to the Planning Board file on the application by Ackermann/NFVS to use TOS Development Rights land for a farm equipment depot. Thank You Nancy Sawastynowicz {:o) 631.734.5093 ---------- Begin Forwarded message ---------- From: Susan Madigan <susan.madigan13(a�gmail.com> Date: November 21, 2016 at 9:15:36 AM EST To: gparpan timesreview.com Gentlemen As a former resident of the Town of Southold and a subscriber of your paper which keeps me informed of local issues. I am concerned with the following. In the draft Agriculture Chapter of The New Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Southold, high land prices are identified as the primary local challenge to agriculture in Southold. The town of Southold supports farming by purchasing development rights to prevent the land from being developed for residential use and to make more affordable land available for agricultural production. William Ackerman's application to build a 7,142 sq ft garage on a 22.8 acre farm protected by Southold Town Development Rights should be denied because it would defeat the second purpose. Mr. Ackerman recently paid less than$24,000 per acre for his deed. Southold Town taxpayers paid almost $23,000 per acre for our deed of development rights in 1998-9. In the future, the Town of Southold may contract for development rights that permit commercial uses, but the deal made in 1999 was that the subject property would be used as a farm, not as a agricultural equipment depot. Sincerely, Susan E. Madigan susan.madi an13 ,zmail.com 1 917-841-0162 r1�� rj>>�/��f%���li��l!/i//�Jf��� �M., "' .. ry �> my�`�m����n����✓ - r .., i Q ...,.._...,... , mem ""r��� ✓/�°�i �,J/l N�/// ri p / .,�9 �. q d` h o Neu rD November 18, 2016 Chairman Donald Wi lceosu & � Y Members of the lel , hoard Town of Southold P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11.971 H Re: Ackerman Agricultural Barn (SCTM* 1000-102-4-6.1) Dear Chairman Wilco nski and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Group for the East find lease accept the following comments regarding the Site Plan Application luiown as"Ackerman Agricultural Barn." proposed The ro osed plan calls for the construction of a 7,142 structure on a 22.8-acre property from which the Towti of Southold has purchased the development rights. Upon review of the Town's planning file on the subject application,it is clear that there is much debate ,'br P Pka rrrry��/a),�rl � r regarding the proposed structure's use and whether it's permitted on this particular site. Specifically,whether the equipment and other agricultural materials could be stored on site, however used to service other sites throughout the Town. In our understand i ng, the Town Code nor the development rights easementspecifically prohibits this use. We respectfully request that the Town of Southold provide clarification 'iyr�l%r'1 j�rllr)Y/�lyr`••'. w on whether the iratc rjcic al use is appropriate for land in which the development rights have �nrr irp,� r ,r y (it been sold. This laardCLIla r situation is likely to occur in the future. In order to protect the integrity of the Town's agricultural land preservation strategy it is prudent to develop policy and standards ircc.��rl�� �'forward.��x Additionally, if Planning Board is inclined to approve the application as proposed,we y br PP pP " P P strongly suggest that the Planning Board consider whether the proposed structure is an appropriate size and in the appropriate location on the property. Many community members have raised fair concerns regarding the preservation of the view shed. Thank you for conaifec-ing my comments. Please contact me at your convenience should you have any quesliorisor concerns. l can be reached at(631) 765-6450 ext.211 or at r i r, rlir yY Yy Sr.Environmental Advocate i J yV I MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S ° " P.O. Box 1179 �� ,, DONALD J.WILCENSKI ,r� u, Southold, NY 11971 Chair "a FFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY54375 State Route 25 JAMES H. CH III ' M (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) .,.., U : . Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 10, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Public Hearing — Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Route 25 &Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: A Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 7, 2016 regarding the above-referenced Amended Site Plan. The Public Hearing was held open for written comment until November 21, 2016. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman DIANE CROSSER 500 ALVAHS LANE J",r % � CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631)478-1420 (cell) li:��I j '� �Kw dscrosserwoman@optonline.netr i � E�)E November 10,2016 Mr. Donald Wilcenski,Chair Southold Town Planning Board 54375 State Route 25 Southold, New York,11971 Re:Site Plan 102-4-6.1(Ackerman) Dear Mr.Wilcenski: I spoke at the October 3,2016 and November 7,201.6 Planning Board Hearings, and also delivered packets of information to the planning board members, again outlining concerns and questions of legality of use of preserved land to house ari industrial warehouse owned by a for profit corporation. I would like to reiterate,that the deed signed on February 5, 1999,in an agreement between Frances Zelinski, Executrix of the Estate of Sophie Kaloski,and the Town of Southold,stipulates that development rights are forever assigned. It declares, "as authorized by section 247 of the New York State General Municipal Law..-to permit, require or restrict the use of THE premises exclusively for agricultural production...and the right to prohibit or restrict use of the premises for any purpose other than its present state of use, agricultural production." The'four corners'of that deed include only property stipulated in that deed, and agricultural use of that property only.The deed does not include agricultural use by a management company(NFVS, LLC),who oversees "hundreds of acres of vines", and requires space to store,fuel, park and maintain vehicles and equipment, chemicals,sprayers owned by that company,for business use/profit. Such industrial use is not within the definition of agricultural/conservation designation,and certainly not appropriate for a residential area. If permitted, it would be fraudulent use of tax payer funded land. As an LLC,the company enjoys tax benefits and limited liability.Any issues/litigation with regard to, but not limited to:water contamination (all adjacent neighbors and nearby homes have well water),air pollution,flammability of toxic chemicals and gasoline, road repair, increased traffic and safety violations,and personal injury would become the financial burden of the residents of Southold Town if the board elected to ignore these concerns. The applicant has stated that he intends to store his equipment on this property,and will build, REGARDLESS of the determination of the Southold Town Planning Board determination. As I previously stated, land was cleared at a frantic pace,trees destroyed, and survey stakes placed by the applicant, based on his interpretation of the survey.There was no site plan,no building permit in place when this occurred.The Planning Department was unaware of the intentions of use of the property by the applicant at that time. I am again requesting that this site plan be rejected in whole;this site is not zoned for industrial use; An industrial warehouse disguised as a barn, remains an industrial warehouse. If you have any questions or concerns, I can be reached by cell ore ail.Again, I thank you for your time, and services to the residents of Southold Town. Yours truly, Diane Crosser cc:William Cremers James is III Martin Sidor Brian Cummings/ Heather Lanza , 7��'awe�>�Pr�mlrJJufY 'd�mt �ii ' � 44 as M..Iii U- 1Q, �-' !ow juLL r I THIS INDENTURE, made this 3th day of February, iM BETWEEN EEFra"Zilinskt, As Execuft of the Esift of Sophie Kok*,4 10 Sod ie�-►�-� �n doweased, raiding at M Ahrahs Laren, Cutdpua, Now York party of its wry' 1 14 9 IgZ5 AND the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,a muNcipat rorporOm h4VVQ fa df4m h and principal plow of business at Main Road, Tom of Southold, County of Suffolk and Me%of Now York, party of the second part; WITNESSETH, theta the party of the forst pest, In consideration of Five Hundred 5avanteen Thousand Two Hundred Sewenty Five Dollars wW No Cents 7 00)1&V-M Money of the united States and other good and valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, DOES HEREBY GRANT AND RELEASE oto the part+of the secwtd ` W, ft VAcomm and wigns forever,THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, by � r Which is math: y the permanent bpi interest and right, as authorized by aadion 247 of the New York Stara GM01111 Wk104I Law,a fid, to Pik• f reWlre or raM f uge 01 d, ° illis aiy for bicultural as*W term Is Mmility defined In Chapter'25 of the Town _.a... ma n w,wens� nurrrprraouutwImrOm �;��VI��IV��l�1f� ➢ , �IYvu1« I II"' Imo' �!� M 1!9�M . ; 1 Southold Planning Department Statf Report Site Plan Application Work Session— Completeness Date September 12, 2016 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Ackermann Agricultural Barn (formerly "Belle River Properties") Applicant: William C. Ackermann Date of Submission: August 29, 2016 Tax Map Number: 102.4-6.1 Project Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Zoning District: A-C Il. Description of Project ot Type of Site Plan: 10 Agricultural Acreage of Project Site: ±22.7 acres Town Development Rights; Building Size 7,142sf This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue. III: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis 1. Existing: planted vineyard and pasture; Expired site plan for Belle River properties (March 2015) for horse barn and stables; 2. Proposed: ±7,142 "equipment storage and warehouse" building with a proposed area of disturbance of 26,702sf; Staff: the language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building (which is what is permitted on site); the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses on site and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing; 3. SEQR: Type II -Agriculture I C CIFF31 Ef LOCJ, 'T melissa.s?"ToCa-tOWD-Southold.ny.us 701T�"rl laall Avulex 54375 LEIC Rouie 25 (cor-fler 0 if 'aii!Road e- ?� Telephonz•(i�,, 1117 0 'S Facssin-lija,, Southold, New v r1c 613 1 765-6-0-40 SOuffiOld, 7-- _JT MN 7, 2 0 116 ItiCURLH LLC 2- ax, 1133QQ Righ's on Land ::-"Ll- Fovtm Dever 1 IVI ""1000-102--4,L6.1 C, in he c -Ocwtura� HOUSC5', A C� IJ-UNEVVi"I 161 )c C r2, The '-nate-r'als PI'888il-,d with the uon, L -IPPlic2tiOn include a floor plan; Orli "he floor plar-I p,,m rlainill notes IjIri-thin is IDo- Uses: C-? "-o 'the ?building corisLI'LICIL-ion and the follow; Shown ing, in r,B9@rd, to the building T, i,L,e i p h shsned Sam building, i"J" c., 0' '19 "1 shap,=!c! Barn building. rl & being within a proposed, '00n to'Che Building. Plat-I tlqa.t this area is L and lots merged. PTO adjacent lot is purchased This use is Ijo-,, vvitfifin the not snovm. sec'c'01-1!' hovilever, LI �-16 10cal`iOjl 1FOrthiS USS iS Z. ci,`.',�3 va"Mn 14 ilz, a� 1160623 T ■ ■ ■ -0 N Y G„W"U uwuuuuuuu D O O 3. O rm ,',;U lu mmmwuRCU 3 PJ7 3 W L� Z �IIIIUIu n w ,f c wdawu �. +' N S F C O 00 LnR'� a, .. 1 N3a O lwn 1-11O N3 r+ aCO NC3m. V ° �p 7 O UUk-Er — j Q N i O i m w w O Q,u'"u oouu v Q N Q Q Z � ti X M w w w r1 •" U gNHHhn IIIIIIIIUU N° a p 1p w uw uuu ,Y 0 0 CD o PSV w ru m CD N 6 UJ� RJ I�mmuuu �i„ @ CD LU e' . 1111 El El 11 El P Uw o_o_��aafn, W X D k �> >op a aj pjn�' (� (U a DO M 42 cr r C •� m S o m CD z a 4' 42 2 a Z Z a� v Its ur r I+ro 'o� (p R 111 CWI RA 3 y Q �� CD Z m ° a eo CD .� 7.% �.r PETITION to oppose the Proposed Site Plan t 2 0 k:ib OW 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-1 pp k We the undersigned, hereby petition Southold Town Planning Board to reject the Pending Site Plan Applicafn. Southold Town owns a Developments Rights Easement on the property that is supposed to limit the use to agricultural. Contraryto applicant's claims, the proposed building is designed for commercial distribution of viticultural services, not for agricultural storage. The proposed location would destroy the view that the development rights were purchased to protect. The proposed size is too big for a property without development rights. The proposed 150 feet wide 50 feet deep (7,500 sq.ft.) building on Alvahs Lane would be out of character and have destructive impacts on the neighborhood. Print Name Address Contact Signature I Q,, CC2,b % S , b�aKe, Sob PrivgljS . „ 61 .,,,w Ly c S t�ven s /0 55 t4"A s Lao e (0 3/-&&d4R _._.._ w��c +.�rF2r►u/�� S,QGUA!>c LN 63/-73Y-S3`/ ........... r5 rd 151 r; r E C E �1 V 11, PETITION to oppose the Proposed Site Plan fo7�� � " w R i U Board 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-10 - 11411_n. --"' We the undersigned, hereby petition Southold Town Planning Board to reject the Pending Site Plan Application. Southold Town owns a Developments Rights Easement on the property that is supposed to limit the use to agricultural. Contrary to applicant's claims, the proposed building is designed for commercial distribution of viticultural services, not for agricultural storage. The proposed location would destroy the view that the development rights were purchased to protect. The proposed size is too big for a property without development rights. The proposed 150 feet wide 50 feet deep (7,500 sq.ft.) building on Alvahs Lane would be out of character and have destructive impacts on the neighborhood. Print Name Address Contact Signature Y. _231 ' ' ' / ice ..� ,�UXS ICZ tC a ° .... a Y-5623" _.._._.._..... .. d4 e7oV WypryryWp_µW ryp 9 ")3c-`77 79 . E PETITION to oppose the Proposed Site Planfc rsouthokRo� "" 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-1(W44:4)2-6�"' We the undersigned, hereby petition Southold Town Planning Board to reject the Pending Site Plan Application. Southold Town owns a Developments Rights Easement on the property that is supposed to limit the use to agricultural. Contrary to applicant's claims, the proposed building is designed for commercial distribution of viticultural services, not for agricultural storage. The proposed location would destroy the view that the development rights were purchased to protect. The proposed size is too big for a property without development rights. The proposed 150 feet wide 50 feet deep (7,500 sq.ft.) building on Alvahs Lane would be out of character and have destructive impacts on the neighborhood. Print Name Address Contact Signature .mm �.. r �"'�row a I ; m J3 m ,.a ., m. m � A " r � I PETITION to oppose the Proposed Site Plan fo �� o� z� _ M app BOA d ;� 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-10 � �a.. We the undersigned, hereby petition Southold Town Planning Board to reject the Pending Site Plan Application. Southold Town owns a Developments Rights'Easement on the property that is supposed to limit the use to agricultural. Contrary to applicant's claims, the proposed building is designed for commercial distribution of viticultural services, not for agricultural storage. The proposed location would destroy the view that the development rights were purchased to protect. The proposed size is too big for a property without development rights. The proposed 150 feet wide 50 feet deep (7,500 sq.ft.) building on Alvahs Lane would be out of character and have destructive impacts on the neighborhood. Print Name Address Contact Signature PETITION to oppose the Proposed Site Plan for 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue (SCTM# 1000-102-4-6.1) We the undersigned, hereby petition Southold Town Planning Board to reject the Pending Site Plan Application. Southold Town owns a Developments Rights Easement on the property that is supposed to limit the use to agricultural. Contraryto applicant's claims, the proposed building is designed for commercial distribution of viticultural services, not for agricultural storage. The proposed location would destroy the view that the development rights were purchased to protect. The proposed size is too big for a property without development rights. The proposed 150 feet wide 50 feet deep (7,500 sq.ft.) building on Alvahs Lane would be out of character and have destructive impacts on the neighborhood. Print Name Address Contact Signature �T� A�� Date: November, 7th 2016 �� `1 � � ���� a . .� C t /- PLn � `� From: Maril Sawastynowicz �� 0 � To: Southold Town Planning Board In 1998, my relatives sold the development rights of my family's farm to the Town of Southold. The purchase price was paid out of funds bonded against taxes. The use of the property was limited to "agricultural". My relatives accepted a reduction in the value of their property with the understanding that the property would be preserved as farmland. My grandfather grew beans, shallots, cauliflower, corn and potatoes on the land for many decades. In March of 2016, Mr. Ackerman of Brooklyn based North Fork Viticultural Services purchased the 22 acres that used to be my family's farm. He immediately proceeded to carve out the full perimeters, he cut down most of the trees and installed a 10 foot high deer fence around the whole property. Many trees bordering neighbors' properties that used to serve as a buffer were also cut down. These trees were there for decades and, the previous owners of the farm respected the buffers. On the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Consistency Review Law assessment form, under "Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development." Mr. Ackerman checked YES, and wrote: "Proposed equipment barn to be built on 23 acres of preserved agricultural land. North Fork Viticultural Services is a growing vineyard management company and requires a barn to store tractors, etc. NFVS directly supports agriculture in Southold Town, specifically the wine industry." Obviously the proposed barn would not be used for farming the preserved property. The barn is described as a building to store "... tractors, sprayers, etc." to "manage" 10 to 12 local vineyards totaling hundreds of acres. What exactly is "etc."? Would all the chemicals used on the other hundreds of acres be stored on the 22 acres? Adjacent Alvah's Lane homes all have well water which could be contaminated from chemical storage and spillage. None of this would "enhance community character or preserve open space"! Under "Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold" Mr. Ackerman checked YES, and wrote: "... Since taking ownership in 3/16 old equipment, rubble&trash has been removed, dumping site graded and irrigation installed. Fences have been repaired & upgraded." Rubble and trash? Every tree on the North side of the farm was removed. Screech and great horned owls nested in those trees. There should be protection for owls. The prior fences on this land were charming horse corral fences near the front of Alvah's Lane. His so called "upgrade" is now 10 foot tall wire fences along the whole perimeter. Definitely not charming or enhancing visual quality. Under "Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. Mr.Ackerman answered YES, and wrote: "The property is development rights sold, so is protected. The proposed barn will provide support to existing agriculture, by providing storage for NFVS equipment-tractors, sprayers etc. NFVS manages 10-12 local vineyards totalling hundreds of acres." The contradiction here is blatant. Building a huge garage for his management company would not protect agricultural land. The building would become a depot for equipment used on hundreds of acres of other properties. The 8 acres of grapevines on site only require a small barn. This barn proposal is an insult to the integrity of the preservation land fund. The purpose of preserving farmland is to prevent this kind of scenario. 7,142 square feet is way too large a building, it would be out of character with the rural agricultural lane. The noise and traffic would impact our quality of life and lower the neighboring property values. Most people I show the proposed facade to think it looks more like a winery rather than an agricultural barn. In the Southold Planning Department staff report dated September 12th, 2016, it suggests that a building for a "equipment storage and warehouse" is not permitted on this property. And an "agricultural storage building" on this site can only be used to serve onsite agricultural uses, not for general storage or warehousing. The applicant's business is contracting. He contracts for vineyard management of hundreds of acres. It is my understanding that even with development rights commercial contracting is not permitted on property located in an Agricultural Conservation Zone. Here the development rights of the property were purchased by the Town to preserve farming. Please deny this development application. Sincerely, 1 nub 7 Ply e 01 7 � November 7th, 2016 To: Southold Town Planning Board ��� '°� "r� ��' w .r1/11"L Southold Town should open it's eyes and not allow a 151 ft long (7,000- sq,. .) building on preserved farmland of 22 acres. The property now owned by Mr. Ackerman is home to many small wild life, especially owls. By cutting down many trees on the property he has already put an impact on the land that affects wildlife, drinking water, air quality, noise pollution, light pollution. kIncreased traffic will cause more needs for road repairs. The proposed garage will also increase needs for police and fire protection. All the above will raise taxes. �r It would disrupt the peace and overall quality of life. This is not just a neighborhood, this is a community that would be affected. "r We don't need any more wineries or buildings to house the machines to operate them. That promotes drunk driving which will cause negative impacts. This should not be allowed to be used for an industrial storage facility. Which is what is essentially being proposed. Protected farmland should only be used for growing owing vegetables, fruit trees and other .Nes. Such agricultural use would be b ne cia o air and water quality and community. The chemical damage from tractors and trucks would cause so much long term damage the land and surrounding lands might never fully recover, Sincerely, Donna Hepworth (A friend of the Sawastynowicz Family) �v - a- C Date: Fri Oct 7 2016 Subject: Proposed Building at 1350 Alvah's Lane .. Southold Fawn Manning Beard To: Town of Southold Planning Board , The building under consideration for 1350 Alvah's Lane would appear to be a warehouse transit terminal for heavy equipment out of proportion to the farm it would be sited on. This would be similar to putting a building like the Port Authority Bus Terminal in a neighborhood and calling it a garage. The development rights have been sold here. Preserve the view and farm character of the neighborhood. Don't allow this type of stealth industry to creep in against the intention of farmland preservation. Justin Porter A frequent visitor to this area from Riverhead, NY p � Y" � Ackerman Site Plan application to Southold Town Planning Board 2E!!111!Lmaj PL b 1 My name is Nancy Sawastynowicz. My mother, Irene Sawastynowicz's house is on the south and west sides of 1350 Alvah's Lane, next door to the proposed site plan. My mother's father, Paul Kaloski, along with my parents and other relatives, farmed the site with organic methods including teams of horses. In 1998, my mother's mother, Sophie Kaloski sold the property development rights to the Town of Southold. Grandma could have sold the property to a developer, instead she chose to sell the development rights to keep the farm a farm. When the current owner, Ackerman, purchased the property, my mother welcomed her new neighbor. In return he lied to her face. He told her he was going to raise cows on the property. It was a shock to learn that he bought the property and is now applying for permission to build a garage to use for storing equipment and warehousing supplies for a commercial agricultural service company. Not long after buying the preserved farm, Ackerman proceeded to cut down most of the trees on the property. Trees in wooded buffers once protected the site (and my mother's property) from strong winds. Now those trees are gone forever. Screech and great horned owls used to nest in the woods. Now there are no woods. Next, Ackerman sawed off 4 inches from my mother's clothes line. Maybe it was over his property, but he could have asked her to move it. I guess he wants to use every single inch of his property for business. He is obviously not the same kind of farmer as my ancestors. The former owner that planted the grapevines was considerate of the neighbors. They even notified my mother before they sprayed fungicide so she could take her laundry in, and close her windows to keep the spray out of her house. When my sister introduced herself to Ackerman, she asked him not to cut the trees on the property line down since they provided some protection to my mother's property from the toxic chemicals that he would probably be spraying on the grapes. He responded that he hates trees and birds. Not long afterwards he sprayed weed killer on the property line. Not only did he kill every plant on the edge of his own property, he killed plants on my mother's property. Not only is he using every inch of his property, he is also using part of my mother's property. I suspect that poisons he is spraying are soaking into the ground and ending up in my mother's well water. Ackerman states on his Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Consistency Review Law form: "Since taking ownership in 3/16, old equipment, rubble and trash has been removed, dumping site graded and irrigation installed. Fences have been repaired and upgraded." Ackerman does not mention that he also removed every trace of rural character and natural habitat, and installed a brand new 8.5 foot tall wire fence around the whole property. For almost a hundred years my family cared for and cherished the farm and the neighborhood. In a few months he has ruined it. To me it looks as if a bomb went off and the area was fenced off. And this summer he applied to you to permit him to transform the property into a base of operations for commercial distribution of industrial agricultural services. I am not a lawyer. I do have common sense, and that is all I need to know that what he is doing is not farming. Please deny Ackerman's application to build a garage, keep the farm a farm and keep Alvah's Lane safe. On the Short Environmental Assessment Form dated August 24th, 2016 Ackerman described the proposed action as a modification "of previously approved site plan". On the same form he checked "YES" to the question, "Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval?" He then wrote "This is an amendment to site plan previously approved by Southold Town Planning Department." These false statements taint the entire application. At the public hearing on October 3rd, 2016 Diane Crosser pointed out that there is no approved site plan for the proposed action. The site plan that was approved for a previous owner was for a small barn in a different location than the massive garage proposed in this application. This fact alone is enough to deny this application. For Ackerman to think he can use preserved farmland as an industrial dumping ground is not acceptable. Why should my mother's adjacent home have to live with the traffic to and from his industrial management company? I don't think it is O.K. to have all the tractors and"etc." driving past her home. In his application, Ackerman says his company already manages hundreds of acres and will be managing more acres in the future. This little 22 acre farm should not be subject to impact's of that kind of intensive use. Alvah's Lane already had to suffer the impacts from the Satur industrial farm. Ackerman's proposed building is much bigger than the Satur farm buildings. If you, Southold Town Planning Board, give Ackerman permission to build a garage and operate a commercial industrial farm service company on preserved property it will change not only the rural character of Alvah's Lane, it will change the rural character of the North Fork. The Town of Southold owns the development rights of the property. Please protect agriculture on the North Fork by prohibiting commercial industrial use of preserved farmlands. Please protect the ancestral lands of my family. Thank you for ymir consideration, -7?:k�C�4 ,e �C4- Frre Family Farming PCL P I� } +Or.'L'4 /rte N,?iv�=1'.�wlr" +4 r� � -�-- -,•� L �11Lr"• wr .7 _ k Pics of Clothesline sty 3� r r� ryy �..���sea,;,, �. � + '�l►'�''�' ,� i � qr rP 'Vs r� H { FI fk ry F � '- � :r. .'rte "'�•'� �`�� . ,.'�4F s � � _ Fig �•` � , 9 �/ �y a Y' r ,t 4 r i4 WON (wool S lot �R l f • I , fes •. �ttti+ �,' s •a4 - =- r 10 sL J� iti f � 631.734.5093r1% 1845 FleetwoodRoad eastcreek@gmailcom Denja SchwartzCutchogue NY 11935 0a,KUs-"T,o,C 11.7.2016 Re: SiteP PP 35 lana application for 1 o Alvah's Lane 0\j IJ �� � U To the Town of Southold Planning Board: � ��"°°r: a:a° In the context of site plans involving land preserved by purchases of development rights it is especially important for the Planning Board to consider the ways a site will be used. The referral to, and advice from, the Town of Southold Land Preservation Committee is not determinative. By law the Land Preservation Committee was required to be consulted, instead it was apparently considered authorized to issue an"approval" for the proposed use. The advisory Land Preservation Committee apparently did not consider how the proposed use differs from agriculture as practiced and understood at the time the deed of development rights was granted. You, the Town of Southold Planning Board, now have the authority and a duty to interpret the meaning of said deed. The issue is not if the proposed use is related to agriculture. The proposed use is agricultural. But the proposed use is also a commercial service business. Uses permitted on agriculturally zoned property do not include all uses related to agriculture, permitted uses are limited to purely agricultural uses. A vineyard services company is not only part of the agricultural industry, it is industrial agriculture and as such is not permitted on preserved farmland. The language of the Deed of Development Rights is clear: "THE DEVEL®PE GHTS"mean: "Restrict the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production" ... "Land used in"agricultural production" shall also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock barns, irrigation systems, and any other structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes." A Site Plan was approved by Southold Planning Board in 2015 for a typical agricultural building, a barn (..SBxa6p Horse Barn),on the north side of the farm located at 1850 Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. In 2016, the vineyard management and service company N.Qirth . ork V:iiticuultural Services LLC ( S)applied for a Site Plan for a commercialarae ..e..„.” a°u." ra„ )on the road in front of the farm. From The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Lan age ,Fifth Edition barn noun x. A large building for sheltering livestock, storing hay or other agricultural products, or housing equipment used for operating a farm. 2.A large shed for the housing of vehicles, such as railroad cars. 3.A particularly large, typically bare building: lived in a barn of a country house. garage noun 1. A building or indoor space in which to park or keep a motor vehicle. 2.A commercial establishment where cars are repaired, serviced, or parked. 631.734.5093 1845 FleetwoodRoad eastcreek@gmailcom Benja SchwartzCutchogue NY 11935 Usage of the words "barn" and"garage" includes multiple connotations, but in general these terms are defined as follows. A barn refers to a building on a farm where agricultural produce, livestock and tools are stored. A garage refers to to a commercial building where cars, trucks and other mechanical vehicles are stored. The site plan applicant calls the proposed building a barn, the Planning Board should call it what it would be, a garage. NFVS proposes to use the garage for storing equipment to rent or to farm other properties, not equipment to farm the property. The difference would impact the quantity of equipment, size and placement of the building. , and view of the farm from the road. It would also impact the nature and extent of use of Alvah's Lane. The type and size of building proposed in the current application has changed several times. The amended plan bears no resemblance to the approved plan. I was informed that the pending application was first made to the Land Preservation Committee, and later to Southold Town Planning Board. Although the record is not clear, it appears that the Land Preservation Committee considered a different plan than the current proposal. The application should be rejected because it is not an amended Site Plan, it is a new Site Plan. Legitimate approval of the site plan would require a use variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The application should also be denied because the building would completely block the protected aesthetically beautiful and pastoral vista with a garage to be used for commercial provision of agricultural services to other properties not a barn to be used for farming the property. The size and location of buildings are not specifically addressed in the Deed of Development Rights, but the Planning Board has authority to regulate both as part of site plan review. The Land Preservation Committee apparently believed that the proposed use was an agricultural barn. At this point the Planning Board should recognize that the proposed use is a commercial garage. Such a use is prohibited by the ease.;�,,,o�13ev ,lad tttt�; 1p i its purchased by the Town of Southold in i ggg. .�y r -4BIL 1 I' ly 1 w qy► Jy r a► .',- Zyr" �'.r 1 "t °_ �i'��'w �.�1! fir. A\•. 11 V r I Pics of Clothesline r� �I• � ' Y WON ..,E... ''• `7 a� *ti i'�.`,;t 4 Vi=i-• f s R, cr ' Yr > J HIJE ,rvC� I�p,4�1 Ni n DIANE CROSSER '4V 0 ';,, 2016 500 ALVAHS LANE :�o5�aq�"I" wwca CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK, 11935 Plaming Board (631)734-5868 November 7,2016 Re:Site Plan 102-4-6.1 (Ackerman) Mr. Donald Wilcenski,Chair Planning Board, Southold Town 54375 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr.Wilcenski: This letter is in reference to the Site Plan Application, 102-4-6.1 proposed at 1350 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue. I addressed the Planning Board at the October 3rd hearing, and respectfully submit additional information enclosed for your review.There are many inconsistencies in the application that was submitted which require further consideration. 1. The applicant has labelled his project: NFVS Ackerman Barn; and states that the current application is an amendment to, "Site Plan previously approved by the Southold Town Planning Dept,": this is untrue. As per supporting documents,the original plan submitted by Belle River expired-and that was for a "horse barn and stables", not a 7,142 square foot structure. The permit submitted by NFVS, LLC, was disapproved (June 7'2016), as noted in the documentation. (Exhibit A). 2. The applicant states he intends to use this property as a "storage facility"for equipment which is used to manage, "hundreds of acres",as a "growing management company". The Deed of Development Rights,states, "....to permit or restrict use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production". A warehouse of, "tractors, sprayers,chemical storage,fuel storage" is clearly industrial use, not agricultural.Additionally, Limited Liability Companies are defined as, "new business structures that combine the features of a corporation and partnership, specifically the tax benefits of partnerships and the liability protections of a corporation" (Legal Zoom). Taxpayers DID NOT agree to pay for development rights for a storage facility with toxic chemicals on site while granting the owner tax relief;that is simply outrageous. (Exhibit B). 3. The applicant states the information he submitted is true. He reports the height 14 feet;the schematic submitted pictures a height in excess of 25 feet. (Exhibit Q. At the October 3rd hearing, Mr.Ackerman stated that no bathroom facilities were planned; his proposal called for a workshop with small bath.Additionally he declares zero parking spaces allocated, however, his vehicles and those of his workers are parked on the property at all times. (Exhibit D).At the same meeting, he reported only eight of the 22.8 acres can sustain grapes, and he intended to plant grass in the other acreage.As per Cliff Batuello,former owner of the property,the applicant stated that his intent was to raise cattle on the property. Eight acres of grapes does not necessitate a 7,105 foot"barn". In summary,this proposal is not an agricultural use, by definition of the language of the applicant himself.This proposal is an industrial use,which will contaminate existing ground waters of adjacent home owners,will contribute to air pollution,will contribute to deterioration of the Alvahs Lane road, and will pose hazardous conditions for school busses,children, pedestrians, dog walkers on weekdays, and will contribute to unsafe conditions for the many bike riders, limos, limo busses,and vans,who use Alvahs Lane as a thoroughfare from wineries on Route 25 to the North Road on weekends. It is unacceptable to place an industrial warehouse in a residential neighborhood, under the guise of "agricultural use". In a recent State Supreme Court ruling,Justice Thomas Whelan, "threw out two laws passed...that allowed farmers to get special use permits to build structures,such as greenhouses, barns..." (Newsday). Richard Am per,executive director of The Long Island Pine Barrens Society stated, "The farmers can't have their cake and eat it to. If they go industrial,then they can't take preservation money at the same time."The Times Review reports, It's obvious that the public would never vote to use public funds to...allow farmers to develop the land anyway." (Exhibit E). The applicant states NFVS is a "growing vineyard management company....which directly supports the wine industry" ;this property is simply not zoned from industrial use. A 7,125 square foot warehouse, housing tractors,sprays,chemical,equipment needed to management of the wineries of the North Fork does not belong on Alvahs Lane. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours truly, Diane Crosser CC: James Rich III Martin Sidor William Cremers Brian C ummings Heather Lanza Melissa Spiro 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I_ ROJ r u I I OY r° 4rAqW10I 0"o be ccxnL�� e Ll � � ;�ry��I �I��gar��I r � L)Li �'r ��. .. �1. APPLICANTISPONSOR2. PROJECT NAME Wit.-I. AM ACKOMAW NFWS j"f"V/J .. 94R/j 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality ,Soun+04--D County u TR K 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide map) 1350 ALVANY . EASE' S I D 1: OF R440 04Ff"A J'400' AgOAk N CrL*M wtn{ R7-- 2S I fJ W7-C4+04 V r PROPOSED ACTION TION IS: Expansion �.lodification/alteration or- poviagIV Y.....m A q ,&fb SIM fw 5. ...p._.., .._ ..............._ !"" d_._.. _... . mm 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY I � . n. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Iniltauy _ acres Ultimately wlllll W..W� acnes 8. 1MLL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?� _.. _..... ...�....,. RoYes No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? CResidenfial ❑ Industrial ❑Commercial - �riculture [] Park/Forest/Open Space Other Describe: PP-470--J't IS 22•844W OF W-S° Aer L.JWD IN OWE- VINE; /4AO S JRfOVNDWel AUA IS FARM-Arlo AND PESI OEN[.as. .�,._..._........,.�,...,.,,,1Y,..._.� iD. DOES ACTION INVOLVE^ m A PFS �^ .MIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDIAGENCY NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGEN � (FEDERAL.STATE OR LOCAL)? Yes RNo If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit/approvals- 11 �.��.DOE ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALLI�,)4 LFP,,MI re u� ;�k f'f�U� N � / E] � ., y � r w w Yes No If Yes,ust agency(s)name and psinfflla rw iM WNS t S A.A./ Ams A0 A�+f� 10 S 1 TV L- ��w� � ���� �� ����m� �,."�" Sovit-W1-z TOWN PJ MeJ fN4 DEQ 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMrr1APPROV� .E I RE MODIFICATION. ........ ..... .� ALR UI �.»,.,„„.,WW E _ ......... .� THE aEST.OF MY d � 1 CERTIF��THENF��NPRO�wVJDEDABL?VE(STRUETD .. .... � .._ . ....._�� � <1 Signature: �i4 i w r ................ L11 the actron � �r 1 Are an you are a state ,�e n , c iwI uipli0)C,���� w������� r � LEE! 1 �1 � ire ing with ul � � cafsrr Coastal �� � ���� �. ���w � ..... � aw ww lO� . . OVER a �.. 1 FORM NO. 3 J" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 7, 2016 TO. North Fork Viticultural Services LLC PO Box 633 Laurel,NY 11948-0633 Please take notice that your application dated May 2,2016 For permit to construct an agricultural building at Location of property- 1350 Alvah's Lane,Cutchogge,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 6.1 Is returned herewith and oro, alae f�'-�"'Iowing grounds: Cc:File,planning 1 4 Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plan Application Work Session— Completeness Date September 12, 2016 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Ackermann Agricultural Barn (formerly "Belle River Properties") Applicant: William C. Ackermann Date of Submission: August 29, 2016 Tax Map Number: 102.-4-6.1 Project Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Zoning District: A-C II. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Agricultural Acreage of Project Site: ±22.7 acres Town Development Rights; Building Size 7,142sf This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue. III: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis 1. Existing: planted vineyard and pasture; Expired site plan for Belle River properties (March 2015)for horse barn and stables; 2. Proposed: ±7,142 "equipment storage and warehouse" building with a proposed area of disturbance of 26,702sf, Staff: the language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building (which is what is permitted on site); the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses on site and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing; 3. SEQR: Type II -Agriculture I Town of Southold LWRP CONSIS'T'ENCY ASSESSiIIENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its siggificant al- m,a �Po � �,1� Irl 7�? °� N�;! rpa�l� �w� ,I a ,�,; _�.... 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. hu .-tch arnwer Mustle.ey 31aftl t�in t1 tl,101, i �i� � i.�����i :� � rliw ;��::��m��M��n- suuyortin2 facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken A copy ofthe LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION _ ...,..._....._. A,_... . _�.,.. ..... PROJECT NAME' r. .5_ ..1' �� �� ...a:' � � ''. Al R��� The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. [ir Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): r (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ( _ construction, planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action .. p a 01 fir,7 � i� i6i �9 „" f • ILII �� t C �. apo n. � .i�" " �, �' W P ----------,............ . �� Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dep6ndent uses and promote siting 6'f new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IE[-Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No MNot Applicable .. ........... ........ .......... ---------- . ..... Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound,the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. SSeye LWRP Section 111-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes El No Not Applicable ------.............. ............... Attach additio�aal sheets ... .... ........................ ................ . ... ......... ............ ............. .............. 4-n—ece&—qi"— Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. RrYes F-1 No[" -.1 Not Applicable �J�ilk" ............ ....... X-c �'-CL t ------------ ----- ................. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section Ell-Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. mmm Yes ❑ No Not Applicable ............... ....... .............- ..........-...................... .......................... ...... ... ..... - ...... ................. .. ........... .......... ................ . ........ PREPARED BY TITLE Amended Ot7 811105 p„ t .,^°"��Vv� 4���. .,,_ ,.......,.'a,...._ �:'",,..'° ,TM�� y� "� . .. ....�. r a� i.m1M1.m�.�.�,��.i���n.''.. mi site ac r z).ge. ...... . reserfla,mmd m se'— . : m � t�mn �mm mmsed mm�on mm °mmen fliedwith tm1,Ovjm (Yf Southold mmum � �mng . If"an mmmt mmm. mm the, mm j,16 mmmmmmfion mmbmml.l,be provided, pl.m amdm .mt��m ';� �; ,.,(b) Maifingaddres .. m C _.... . , �. (c ";�m mm m`mmmmmmµ number:mm m: Area gym.t mmfi (d) Application numbef, _. ilI time acfion be direzfly ujndtwja : mm,requjre,17undin& or apj� Ov&],by a state or federal ency'm?' yes . Hyles,which State mem"IW(�mm al agen m" ? ... ®. C. EvAllat. I'll p roject to th C 1"6110, mmmg polficips by an alyzmmm 9 11mm'mY 01C Pr )ect will furtber support,or not � mmide� all � rl)msei Best � � �completion. h,, ill orth, each mOCY, ,�u mtmmmttmm tmt m tmmus m �mm m�� m molu ,l tmansmidr ll reqtiire [hal 1.11ms . ' � mm �m��uu��"mm ld t m�lmm. "n uses com�coastall[it c ara ter, �m:mt�mm;� L :���mm� mm �m mwm�am�m mm of mtma���"� mmmm�m�m� �mm tem �"m�m��� 1��mmmm�.tmuc�m,andtmu �mmmmmmm°�"mS mm ��m��m�tmw�m��.��mm °�m � �m��mmm�mm�m�rm��mm� �j,'tm�m�'tt�1 Section tt .re, makes W.�mm��t�">iu ��; : " mm mm?m,m� `mx��m�mmm:�,�mmm�m, mem criteria. q pq Not Applicable Il" 47 e�f S.�l (i f '� �Y M. �� —M-LZ „,_ N,m��wm � P" � _ �✓".� ^ .� '�J�"�"m., ",�'"' � Y��>ti m�.., mm1 � � - r �° 1P �.mmmtu addifis.mmaa) SbeetsI t mmtmmmmmm �: and tmm m m m m mm pmt '�mmm mm" mt mm:m mm mmiwm mmt mm rmt m mmmii:mm°m im f u'he"t"mYIN1m 01'�µ'"ltl°m 1 mism �..n"'t" tt.IIV� m� 3 i�I !iugtm 6 fmmm e., "°rmlmm 1tiOmm i.m IVlil:�„m m m Sell Ill , �,��m���m� w�m..�� Pages 1v In Jll�'t ..m... Not.Applicable --, MELISSA A. SPIR OFFICE LOCATION: LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR Town Hall Annex melissa.spixo@town.southold.ny.us 54375 State Route 25 (corner of Main Road& Youngs Avem Telephone(63 t}765-5711 Southold,New York Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re; Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM#1000-102.-4-6.1 a Dear Mr.Ackerrriann, At riga reguW raaeeting I°r0d on h aaa la 't, 2016, the Land Preser tiraaa C ������� accordance Wutl*r Section 25-5() t (2) [31 o tji,�e 1°u ��(u 4 ode reviewed tl�a Committee YOU OUffined in an yap pfic bora dated 2/24/16, fOr an rpbr LOUrcal r3arn ,araat ,..a j'~t. naatiltt,�ra l i:'1111-r1p Fh-)seam. 1. PM'ff al survey (u.j data4d) ittr a hand-dra+ ►r Sketch of the aIX'O fin at° loca loam, ralra amat�ic dl-awiligs (i.md ted) arrri fl00r plat',,na (undated) were in luded will°a tlaa:a aapjl ca~atjoM .,. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard din uses: to the building a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "L" shaped Barn building. b. Workshop w/Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the °L" shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above ThiS Use rs show wr-� as being ' aPI OPOsed extension to the Barn Building. It i h amadwr itt n on the t liar" lfwr�rt this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased cind lots rnorp ed, d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. 'zoow- Fad'Miii V I 7 IGr 'I'k!Y"maiuwuh".W!wue mmii�r 6 i THIS MENTURE, made this Sth day of February, 1988 BETVVM Frances ZelingM,As EaecAix of the Estat of Sophie Kaiaski,6tt4t 3);tc vice: -a dewased, residing at 89S AWft UM, Cut&$*&, New York PAY Qfthe firat part. AND the TOWN OF BOUTHOLD, a munmcipat cmPOrOW hVIN its otflcs t and prirrdpe p 1 Isms of bk*rmess at Main Road, Town Of Southold, County of Suffolk and 8Wi of New York, WY of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the POW Of the first W. in cwskkW*tion of Five HWKW SwMrteen Thouand Two Hundrod Seventy Five Dollars and W Cents tip; ($517,275-00iarwRut mnonay of the United States and other good and valuabte d COfl1ldl oon p"by the party of tt second DOES HEREBY GRANT AND RELEASE Wo the Pak of the Second W. its wcassors and salsa tarOW-THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, by which is maM: F the petnwmt tp ,interest and right, a authorized by section 247 of the Now York Staff Natal Murtt Dal law,es sm nded, to perrnft, �y j: or raft the use of the prem m viousively for agr1cwhuml prodLcUw a!h#arm is prs@"1Y daRlrrsd In CriaPfsd'28 of to Town � C O I-- mimM04 IIIIIIIIII@IIIIIIIIIIIIV Film O LU O c1111 C .O � H Cc � kLU O TOM cm 0 um TWO CO) z � N vU . U, �I N 2 Wt Ma ZCO UVV IVQIV�IIIIIIIIII� N 0 LLJ < C4 O 'aI WHIM OR C C Co O — 0t 3: N a c U) Z E z v> LLJ IL = . N O0 20 0L " z Tamao What Does LLC Mean on the End of a Company Name? by Laufen Miller,studioD i LLC is the abbreviation for limited liability company.LI-Cs are relatively new business structures that combine the features of a corporation and a partnership,specifically the tax benefits of partnerships and the liability protections of a corporation.State governments regulate LLCs,and restrictions on LLC names and abbreviations vary from state to state. File an LLC application Fit your business needs with the right LLC package ui u .,; p' il� I 'i Ililllll htto://www.leaalzoom.com/limited-liability-company �IIII � History Business structures similar to LI-Cs have been in use in Europe since the nineteenth century. However,LI-Cs in the United States did not appear until the late 1970s.The state of Wyoming enacted the first LLC law in 1977,providing the first legal definition of the structure.Other states were slow to create LLC laws as they waited for the Internal Revenue Service to decide on how to treat LI-Cs for tax purposes.LI-Cs can now choose to be taxed as sole proprietorships,partnerships or corporations. LLC naming conventions vary from state to state. Limited Liability Related Articles The"limited liability"in LI-Cs refers to the fact that owners,called members,are protected from personal liability for the business actions of the company.Consequently,if the LLC is sued or runs What Does LLC Mean for a up debt,the personal assets of members cannot,in most cases,be used to satisfy claims from Company, plaintiffs or creditors.This is a feature that LLC members have in common with the shareholders of corporations.However,liability is"limited"because members are not immune to suits involving civil wrongdoing,also known as a tort. What Does a Limited Liability Company Mean? Abbreviations and Variations Each state has rules regarding how the words"limited liability company"can be represented in a What Does LLC Mean in a company name.These rules are generally explained in the"Name"sections of a state's LLC law. Business? Generally,business owners can use the words"limited liability company"or"limited company"after the LLC's unique name.Some states allow"limited"to be abbreviated at"Ltd."Commonly allowed abbreviations include"L.L.0°"L.C.,""LC"and"LLC" Restrictions States have restrictions on what type of companies may be defined as an LLC,including banks,trusts,credit unions and insurance companies.Consequently,LI-Cs are prohibited from using words in the company name that imply the firm is conducting business as a restricted type.Depending on the state,restrictions may also include LI-Cs that provide professional services such as doctors,therapists and acupuncturists. References &Resources I..V„17i w r iv of0fisc_onsin twill^ t fr t ,�/^�Ywuyy c,v�aac,ed /nl�/g00 /a,)( ufii 71 t'Rl,r .�..`...;malrrad..�gria�Pa ri k �n.ceiwhY � mv�.f.a ri,la_• I__ �ufly/ .�_f�VrrOia� �rplcrl /fQ�;� gwb�mrt�l� sl,llly � urP..:�ka/ -L-L,( , I, About the Author Lauren Miller has more than 10 years of experience as a writer and editor.Her articles on technology,small business and legal topics have appeared in magazines,newspapers and trade journals.She has a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy and is an avid gardener and sports fan. Photo Credits Jupitedmages/Photos.com/Getty Images Next Article: What Does LLC Mean for a Company? Site Data Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure �Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: 2►2—8 /sq. ft. 1 ^ Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ac./sq. ft. ? ...... _._ _ __. ......... _ ....._.­ _ .. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes µfi` m No Ifvesi . �.°'q: aii,i (; � � i��P� � � ��� v������ 1 So1`� Does the parcels) meet the Lot Recognition standard in Town Code§280-9 Lot Recognition? Y_N_ If"yes", explain(and attach any necessary documentation—title report, subdivision approval, etc.) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 6/ 7 / /6 I Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No l� If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses:_.....I� ,&0& `1VfU --y!_N„PO" fi.� List all proposed property Yuses _. _.._ �,. , Other accessory uses: NbA Existing lot coverage: sN ..._-­% Proposed lot coverage: 0.7 % Gross floor area of existing srun ��N. �e _ ...... Q sl�. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): S1._. ..... D #ofexisting �a es ..— #of proposed spaces: w.-. . Loading.B..ert h: Yes No ata _ Q <ridsc,kpng Details: Fx*ls��3a�L.", l PICi(�s,,,,,tpe 1 ,,,,Tf""ta- V % I-Irok`���FeCI �r�Bki�l t �S'7 " co^ v° lir. .._. __... ._ ...... ...........-------- i Wetlands: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No V Maybe �d,, certii° gnat all the above ion' i. t�i:�, a m��i. a u�: W u; rniation is true. t f Signature of Preparer: j.. �� 1 Date l r ................ - 2 Site Plan Application Firm 2%1&2010 1r is, ra Filed Map No. Lot n. WFc and occuponvy rQwAus and M&A use and occupancy of proposed construction: r tri, l01 n 1. m ar,6 nanit ll�rl � �a l �"1 h��," rt'1p i r b. lr1,P:.Dwt:la::�4� yr:` r°tr,'Gal. z' `.'lCr-�"k'!N," ( n E.f 6 �, a "i q r. ^'.�P :�Y,^.,� QS�J4/ l'm"h �: arras rsl h �wlr,�lrtion .._ _ Other Work (Description) l)(/11 r�a Fee (To be paid on fling this application) >. d""(r p' nrwnj'b�r iiniD; Nulnl:)(n of dwelling units on each floor kluge, number r 1rfcDDI ' 6, �.P �i 1�.V`�'"-, ,, (e CrlYll'CYs..I(, M W iillt,s'w U MlviMrqn qWdy II4 are flY,'W e IUH of CaA lype of Me e`rcy-lua '� Number of StOfIES Dimensions�/6 s eraid�n addtions: Front Number �. Lj Height �,...._... D�uml;ar Of StOlieS ".�. :.A M1,I(pR,1,. FwI!p" p,,�" a .. ,4 v 10. r<I ��IArfl➢,< f = ��lp s§( i� a� dl�� sr „g of Former Owner H. rl,w>gwD;or me('uStyaa.t�aa.'sshrOh l)rr(1'r1 i C'S tit'Te sipulflD:ed 12. Does D;rnulbosea(cmMnw&n Mme aC�, zoning 1,araas,p h" Rll :& ol"V ,"Vla'ftoh S ..,_.NO ,r' Qbe uw.�p w�a�w�ws:�?�u,l:S'._.__..__G'�() �°" Vii' �z.°.ce ,>ii��i bwrwmaw¢t Rom psvmh" Yh^.`S, 0 4 k . rF * ErE � > a a:.'Us pDisDyly wilIn 100 of afidm..wxDepAmhx a lm°�..��;BDwaDa ar wnret� � c � � l�rael " s 'D'l:;°� u�a(:' lr :l' r'p_,b, °a(.y(rl8la(Li,..p.,()V>a.N i"a,U EJ-,S &111vw.aePlf,p(.( uGrS16A V B.El(EYeMa b.03 Go Prop:rru° y a~,relin 300 laww o(Mz'A.hl as tatiu= * YF" NO IF YES,1111C 113MUS k"wrl.^°rvY M 1pl:;aQUIRl.(�i'D. fl, t8I I d Y' L) no,tiob s .y i ate {C7d.XMMAU jl M1 fluid IfkD<i'�i}r I W j?I lqM I ,Im,. '. �a :TiCIl1 t "�lY"q pow illi on pYf`j7 dy is n; 10 Not or 7i 1rly tP13ff.k1 pvOt k`wk. )h,"7owmd M oo w t � V �� �.4ib(IY,IIia,ai.ef I�e�;i � �� l a � 'r,r '�` r`l f nF q € �.I��f I,����;'a l� �]�f'�� li�:� �(Y k,6�1 )�"f.1���� ."J ii, 21-01 .,._.... - .._ _-_.....--.. . _�._..._....................__.____ r 4 i, .m...�..._..�.....�.w,�,.....,.�.�,. ,w, ,,,..,�.�.��,..........�.aw.r.�a .tee..,, y �� � �� „ ti r x � P Ulr i� r a� � >f r r �` r OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. S l :l "" Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 54375 State Route 25 mer.issa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road& Youngs Avenue) Southold,New York Telephone(631}765-5 712 Facsimile(63I)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS P.O.Box 1179 Southold..,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.4-6.1 ik Dear Mr.Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24116, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House.A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "L" shaped Barn building. b. Workshop w/Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "L" shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the to not shown. e. Purnp IKruse: t'henniiucallll Storage, IIIFUel Storage & Irrigati, This use is shown as withiri a sc:lll arate building. 4. Code requirements / Bulk Schedule (AC): a. Lot Coverage i. Maximum: 20% ii. Existing: 0% iii. Proposed: 0.718% b. Setbacks for the proposed building (AC) „ Rewired � � q Provided Front yard 60' 60' Side (SE) 20' 228' _... Side NW 20' 45 comb 251' ._..Rear yard.... _......e.._m._..__... ..75.'.........__...__ ........._ _671...'..........................................................�.. �...�_. c. Parking: none proposed. This building is for owner use only; (also as required by Town Development rights easement). i. Two (2) 28' wide curb cuts to Alvah's Lane are proposed d. Drainage: three (3) 8' x 10' deep leaching pools e. Exterior lighting: photometric plan provided on sheet two (2) of the site plan; f. Exterior Signage: none proposed /specified; V: Staff Recommendations 1. It is recommended that the application be found complete for review to begin the coordination process; 2. Set public hearing for October 3, 2016; 3. Classify action as Type II under SEAR because this is an agricultural operation; 4. Send referrals to CFD, Town Engineer, ARC, LWRP, Land Preservation, Fire Marshall, Code Enforcement and the Building Department. 2 4 c I "�°.�.A.,mow+ Wy �°IQJ I U..a° ��a �'� ,�'�w QB r� O �� 4� ,w+• U "�°��yqI�S: W,u�� GLq l�> w°'j °; ..�0� �yy 1 y° yv� O """ ° aha'"W.V a O e V IP' rca '" °,�;b " o C,:ku �r,'� n p O O a r� °cffi U W ��q a� a O�� � "�y f l C9`®u b4J° ria k 4 $ COD Atl eaq° ® cn ° biD Ori O 0> O O 9 a Qdm � aD S6b MCWD� aro 0. eda • T.j ,W o Q) aa m o az» U O Uwe qy QA �k��L•n U QD U �g O q,�°'U� rDs IY�a 4P o,Oq � waw. °w" U � � . uC7A1o�"r CID aPk w U"a '_O m-u qD 0D 8" a q a a� Ck .pG�� "�" ° "° �a° C',y �°N"0 q•� � °.�" 5a 4b 6,D°p�� �Y " +„a an C`!bp I k . alUr. a D cd y ° Ql) Naha Pe ,° M V �°u�m qr$"kD�0 � V. °tRUD ren Cw U O p °� 'v cl U a L� . O 0 n O en � Cu"aa O � 04 aja� r . cry° O >~ ow A q U Cu + q m�, 0 q "� a+� lcnr 9. 'Y WA I t 6 ,CY�,yb v g', �'S q,a o.�'�ge �CPu'a � �y y•d ° wU.a ° ,�°�� Cbb �..a pb PA ° Pww U'* %' Cd a; �.°rDz° 'pD qn"0'd U n7 0 U m CA 5 gNYP%�e 0"&sa°uC� �.� +�+ cd .WMIS N (y �. y O U CAo �" N w Q' �•^ v°i U:� b by o'-0 � a bo ao ar3 ,d w o N >,'d y oh �Uy Y'f� as o .� 0 .4 N O G4 d ap+ U +� .' vi .O b " b N ODS •� ��j C4 y N o cd cd L', y N p y c+ O cd id O a+ N� ; �rA G bAy s: Ornra ��� � y 2,20 G7 y.°r N D7 4 ° U'O cy fid C1 a U FI byp 2 C Ll,�.� p y ,� N �, q �w $. U 04 spa N 4, o�.v��ib� p0 C c�p'n •d ate^ ° v aD y 'O+ w '� �w m �n 13414 _ '� .� y o.� o 1w u u° Ma n ba a° 99 u am O u -0 QI 0 C5,mU° ""'"� aSD-T-& y q nn 0 0U a CVD a ¢pp° �Y q uW�D�� a cw° mu crew ua N „°� ¢� �Dp ° e c� r4 edy fir ' °"""'�d"u"„a o y kik owa uF, o R a 4 as c a s IN NOW �” G Cqa" 9 �:� ° e "u 9 °I 4 y ami as �q .4 O " � a � O .x.x & uj i u ul Pq F r 0u71.1.F C4 W ,n°re a �arty v _. i Pogo f moerJWNwm.'uw�oWLlw W YooN f.... xxrvrxx%Wfmxa n mvhWnfiOA:qm l➢M'�nb^ry YYI1NItl Court: No frWT1orvimimmm Mme wNWwrwww��wrvow�wwst'wrn w➢i�fiSLY-YY91�""°"w ,. '"" „•, ,,. exc,eptio�ns on preserved 110 armlana Vktory'r ts 0 0 1. in.. six-year case BY PAUL SQUIRE rights program, declaring the code"null and void ,SENIOR STAFF WRITER and of no further effect." Smithtown attorney Jennifer Juengst, who has Special permits and so-called hardship excep- represented the Pine Barrens Society in the case tions,which allowed farmers to develop preserved since its 2010 filing, said Friday that "it's been a farmland,have been deemed illegal, according ding to six-year haul." She said the Legislature's actions a New York State SupTeivaie Court ruling. circumvented the will of the voters by creating a The decision,made Sept. 28 by Justice Thomas "back door"for development on protected land. Whelan, came in response to a case brought by Long Island Pine Barrens Society executive di- the Long Island Pine Barrens Society against Suf- rector Richard Amper hailed the ruling as a major folk County. The lawsuit argued that the county victory,saying the county had no right to change a shouldn't allow development on preserved farms publicly approved program in order to allow more where public funds were used to purchase devel- development. opment rights. "The court made it(;iear that politicians cannot Specifically, the Pine Barrens Society targeted alter programs approved by the public,"Mr.Amper amendments to the program approved by the Suf- said."It's obvious that the public would never vote folk County Legislature in 2010 and 2013,which the to use hnn.n1bUic funds to prevent development only to suit describes as"expansive permit and exemption allow h-u-mers to develop the land anyway." loopholes" that allowed farmers to build on land Suffolk County attorney Dennis Brown said his that should not have been developed. office is reviewing the decision and has not yet de- It wasn't immediately clear at presstime if any cided whether it will appeal the ruling. farmer has developed on land preserved by the Legislator Al Krupski(D-Cutchogue)was among county. 16 legislators who voted in favor of the 2013 Suffolk County's development rights program, amendment that was struck down.In an interview enacted in 1974, offers farmers and landowners Friday, Mr., Kru(nski staidthe legnsl itloln had been moneyinexchange fora legally binding agreement debated publicly before gtwas, adoi)ted and was that the land won't be dc,,velr."nped. Subsequent ref- meant trn fielp fdnnnersi nnneet cahangin.; r ee(]s on. erendum votes have enhanced the program. their properties. In the Supreme Court's 10-page decision,Justice "Production changes a lot,"he said."You need to Whelan stated that development allowed by spe- be able to adapt." cial permits and hardship exemptions"constitute Mr.Krupski said the criticism of the provisions a substantial intrusion upon the public's right to came from a"lack of understanding" about what prohibit development." He also said exemptions kind of development farmers had requested,such allowed the county's farmland committee to"grant as g,r eennhottses —earn nsiruction he said was sup- a host of carte blanche deviations from the very posed to help their i'nnn.ming operations.He added oilnof tile or'i&gi,nnnnl state i.nr.nnnl,nanci preservan- that lige caruoty is"'working on a response" to the tionstaaote n,rpork wldcnln ftie c`t,inty(rased its,laws. ruling. As pail of leis decision, the justice tlnrew�anent the two annnendnrnennts to the poral ase of development psquireGMmesmviewcom � C_ MT ,P�L ro Nov.4, 2016 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Re: Request for Information,Ackermann Agricultural Barn,Alvah's Lane Vineyard. I am in receipt of your letter dated Nov. 1,which arrived after I submitted information for the file on Nov. 3,so please add this to the file also. North Fork Viticultural Services owns, leases and manages a number of vineyards. I grow and sell fruit from my own vineyard, plus grow and sell fruit from leased blocks at other vineyards,and manage/consult for non-leased areas of other vineyards. • Alvah's Lane Vineyard, 1350 Alvah's Lane —I own 23 acres;9 acres in vines, 10 more acres to be planted in vines. • Clovis Point Vineyard, 1935 Main Road, Laurel—lease 1 acre, manage 6 acres. • Jason's Vineyard, 1785 Main Road, Laurel—lease 11 acres. • Anderson (Onabay)Vineyard, 1600 South Harbor Lane, Southold—lease and manage 20 acres (ratio between lease/manage varies by harvest, according to what fruit Onabay keeps for its own wine, and what fruit I sell.) • Hounds Tree Estate, 2600 Oregon Road, Mattituck—lease and manage 27 acres,varies as above. • Pindar Vineyards,37645 Peconic—consulting manager for 223 acres, lease varies as above. Pindar Vineyards uses its own equipment; I oversee and direct the vineyard management program. • Lieb Vineyards, 13050 Oregon Road, Cutchogue—consulting manager plus seasonal spraying services for 90 acres. To summarize,the proposed barn is to store equipment that is used to manage my own Alvah's Lane vineyard, plus vineyards that I lease/manage. I do not own a separate set of equipment for each site because that would be prohibitively expensive;the equipment rotates around in season,and sits in storage in the winter.ALL of the equipment is also used on site to manage my own vines and property. The equipment will be stored at Alvah's Lane regardless,as I have purchased the property to be a working farm, not as a public service to provide scenery for the neighbors. Equipment in a storage barn will be far more attractive than equipment stored outside or under a large, plastic, round truss-type temporary shelter. Proper shelter will also prevent damage and deterioration to the equipment,which could cause unnecessary expense and create a potential hardship.The ongoing success of North Fork Viticultural Services and Alvah's Lane Vineyard relies very strongly on the equipment being in good working order.A working farm needs a barn. Under section 100-220 of the Southold Town Code,our farm practices are protected from interference by adjacent owners. It also declares agriculture to be desirable,and supported by Southold Town. Denying a barn to shelter essential equipment that is used on-site would be in direct conflict with this. Furthermore,the Land Preservation Committee,which deliberates on appropriate uses for preserved land, has already assessed our proposal and approved in writing the basic principle of having a good- sized storage barn on this site.Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code explicitly states that land In agricultural production shall include equipment storage buildings, and there is nothing in the law about development rights sold land that prohibits a storage barn. (see attached from Land Preservation mittee). Regards, William A n, NFVS, LLC. ° OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. SPIRO ��1'� u�i ��� `'rz Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR i` �' '� 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road&Youngs Avenue) Y f Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 Facsimile(631)765-6640 'tip ��� i ' MAILING ADDRESS: r� ��"�� P.O. Box 1179 ,bJs Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: ^f'r --p.a. Equipment Storage per,p u SAL This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "L" shaped Barn building. � b. Workshop w/Small Bath ( This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "U shaped Barn building. GM-fi-SM <� c. Garage w/Office Above (2g,)Y" SA I,- - This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. (�/-tZ-N "(A,u It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. (aas^c.f rr 4,TP J "6T 7015 P��r t lLi`H e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. During meetings we had prior to the Committee review, you clarified that the "Home in Phase 2" was not proposed to be located within the area subject to Town Easement, and would be proposed only on an adjacent 0.35± acre lot known as SCTM# 1000-102.-4-9.1. This lot is not subject to Town Easement, and you are looking to purchase and merge this property with the property subject to easement. If the purchase and merger occur, you are proposing to construct the house, and to attach same to the Barn/Workshop area, by constructing the additional building area shown as proposed "Garage w/Office Above." Due to the fact that the "Home in Phase 2" is not proposed within the area subject to Easement, the Committee did not review the "Home in Phase 2." In addition, the proposed "Garage w/ Office Above" was not reviewed or approved, as this part of the structure is not part of the current application since the adjacent lot has not been purchased or merged with the subject property. The Committee's review consisted of review of the "L" shaped Agricultural Barn building (estimated from floor plan as being a building of approximately 96±' x 47' and 41'x 40) and the separate Pump House structure (16' x 20') shown as including the following uses proposed for agricultural purposes: • Equipment Storage. • Workshop w/ Small Bath • Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed The recorded easement for this property restricts the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as defined in Chapter 70 to the Town Code. Section 25-50-C. (2) [3] requires that the Committee serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights,have been acquired by the Town. The Land Preservation Committee members concluded their review and found that the agricultural uses described above, shown as located within the "L" shaped Barn building and' the Pump House, are agricultural uses consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement. Please note that the Committee's approval of this use within the easement does not mean that such use or buildings will be approved or permitted by other departments or agencies. The Committee's approval allows you to proceed with pursuing any applicable approvals that are required by Town Code. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro ` Land Preservation Coorrlinator enc.: application w/attachments cc: Building Department w/enc. Planning Board w/ enc. Pc,l2.T►U"" D actually used In bona fide agricultural production a defined In one* Mu ldpal Low section 247. h . M. AND the party of the first part, covenants In all aspects to comply with 3. Section 13 of the Lien Low, a same applies with said conveyance. The definition of"Agricultural Production: as defined in flection 25.,M of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code is as follows: Agricwltural Production•shall mean the production for i commercial purposes of crops, livestock and livestock products, but not e land or portions thereof used for processing or retail merchandising of k= such crops, livestock or livestock products. land used n'agricultural prod udlon shell also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock bane, irrigation systems, and any other structures used a exclusively for agricultural purposes.' w THE party of the first pert and the party of the second part do hereby convenant and agree in perpetuity that either of them or their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives or assigns, shall only use the pmmises on and after this date for the purpose of such agricultural production surd the grantor covenants and agrees that the underlying fee title may not be subdivkied Into i' plots by the filing d a subdivision map pursuant to Sedions 285, 278 and 277 of I:' QNiLll awn p SUBMISSION TO PLANNING BOARD N V 0 3 2O'�6 1350 ALVAH'S LANE BARN- NFVS, LLC./WILLIAM ACKERMANN Sa0h 117.111111 1r RE: PUBLIC HEARING To address the concerns raised at the public hearing on Oct. 3, 1 offer the following information: • First, it is important to understand the operations of NFVS.We manage our own 23-acre Alvah's Lane site, plus vineyards that we effectively lease to grow fruit to sell,as well as vineyards owned by others.To do this,we use equipment such as sprayers,tractors, hedgers, netters, mowers and bins. In the growing season,from early spring through late fall,such as right now, the equipment is out in the fields. It is moved around to the different sites as needed. We do not own a full set of equipment for each site.When not in use, it either remains on site,or will be in the barn. In the winter, none of the equipment is in use and it all needs to be under cover.This equipment represents a large investment for the company, and it cannot be left outside.So far, we have been leasing barn space month-to-month, but this a temporary solution at best. • Size of barn—7,142 sq.ft.This barn, including the loft, is for storage only.The size is necessary to accommodate the equipment already owned by NFVS, as you can see on the schematic provided.The lot coverage relative to the size of the property is very small.The Alvah's Lane property was purchased primarily to build this barn for agricultural use, as well as to generate income from the vines.The equipment owned by NFVS is typical for managing any vineyard,so even IF we were only managing our own vineyard on this site,we would STILL need this barn and the equipment.Any serious agricultural use on this 23-acre property requires a good-sized barn. • Daily use of barn-There is no regular day-to-day activity taking place,such as processing.Our field workers will not park there, because they park at the vineyard sites where they work.We do not provide transportation.The field crew will only be there when they are working on the Alvah's Lane vineyard itself. NFVS Chemicals such as pesticides are delivered roughly every ten days in the summer, as needed, and used immediately, not stored in the barn.The truck and trailer will make one or two trips to the barn a week. So,there will not be much daily activity at the barn. • Style of barn—We are using a reputable barn-building company,and the style and colors are attractive,traditional, and in keeping with the rural nature of Alvah's Lane and the North Fork. • Location of barn—We considered all the possible locations on the property very carefully, including impact on the neighbors,and this is the best site. We need a level,well-drained area that has safe access to Alvah's Lane.The selected location is level,with open visibility up and down Alvah's Lane to facilitate safe ingress and egress.This area also has a buffer of vineyard between it and the neighbors to the south and east,and is furthest from the neighbors to the north.The other sites are not as suitable.The northwest corner of the property has a steep slope, and poor visibility to the road, making ingress and egress extremely unsafe as 1 reported to the Planning Board in the previous meeting.Any other location for the barn would also be much closer and far more visible to the adjoining neighbors. f SO MAILING SS: MEMBERSPLANNING BOARD ^ � �� +.,, sot®ld,®x 1179 NY 11971 DONALD J.WILCENSKI Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH IIIc , (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) RTIN H.SIDOR 4YSouthold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outholdt ownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 1, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Information Proposed Amended Site Plan for: Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: To assist the Planning Board in their review of the application referenced above, please provide the following to this department at your earliest convenience: 1. List of all vineyards currently managed by NF Viticulture Services, LLC; including the location (address or SCTM#), total acreage and acreage of planted vines. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Steven Bellone SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Department of Economic Development and Planning Theresa Ward ADivision of Planning Acting Commissioner and Environment October 14, 2016 Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Brian Cummings Dear Mr. Cummings: Pursuant to Section 2391 &m of the General Municipal Law,the following site plan which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan Address File No. Ackermann Agricultural Barn SCTM# 1000 10200 0400 006001 NIA Note: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s)associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Sarah Lansdale Director of Planning Andrew P Fre rig M APF/cd Chief Planner H.LEE DENNISON BLDG ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HWY,11th FI ■ P.O.BOX 6100 ■ HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 (631)853-5191 �►�►-�-c...��u� � roc Submission Without a Cover Letter OCT 2 1 2016 Southoid Town Sender: Flanging Board � � 1 l Ac- � ��y\ Subject: Ac Q Avg V SCTM#: 1000 - Date: 10 1 -2, t Comments: 0 l QkS � D � fIJ [ li OCT 2 1 2016 Southold Town Planning Board 19s 0"ft Back-Facing East 20,0"tt a5'@n ft _ ,30'W.!t Double Sliding Doors -,., - {: Plall Mower-1 8'x 6' Drive-Through L i � Ll 'x i2' rhaad Doors R 2 UtilityTrailers 18.2 17x - x B'6" Ulll' hailers 3 64 1T x 8'6" - Winter Equipment Storage Configuretion + o rplI Mowe=2x 8 - f Chipper+Vac 18'x 8'6" Clemere-1 8'x 6' K `� K �flall Mower-3 6x6 + + N C m 8 e o 8 Clemens-2 °a I Post Pounder-1 8'x 6' S� R x V O • Hedger ^' - gx sx l O 1-7 m Lo k •� NetMasler-1 B'x 6' m m n -- Hedger-2 B'x 6' _{ x Post Pounder-2 6'x 8!I — — + r Equipment Storage k a Ne[Mas[er-2 B'x6' Leaf Remover-1 8'x 8' °f Vicon Spreader-1 8'x6'1 — V X � hador M7040-3+Back-Up Sprayer-1 26'x B'8" a � � BuckeVGreppler-1 8'x. 14'x 12'Overhead Doors vk on sweeaer-2 B'x e` Spray Equipment aro wood Chipper 12'x B' X P Y Storage >s _ Perfecta oleo-1 8'x 6' o? Drive-Through m 14'x 12' gall Doors Equipment Storage BuckevGrapplm-2 6'x Equipment Storage a 14'x 12'rJ} {head Doors Double Sliding DooY9 = 14'x 12'Ov rhead Doors Front-Facing West 14'x 12' rhea Doors _ 4 }lar Ptannkw Baurd Off ae IhtLar doted Ootober 7.20111 Itisni l, See Floor Plan Equipment Placement Schematic Above Mm 2. See Separate Detailed Drawings with Second Floor/Loft Storage Item 3. No Chemicals will be permentally stored.All Chemicals used as ordered. Rom 4. Supply Deliveries estimated at minimum two week intervals during growing season hum 4. Trucks and/or Trailer trips no more than once or twice per week D � C � L� OCT 2 1 2016 Sol:Muld Town P[anriinry Board 162'0"ft- Back _ — -Facing East 35'6"1t 20'0"ft 35`6"ft 'W"V it Double Sliding Doors Plan Mower-1 8'x6"1 Drive-Through — — 14'x 12'�Ovhead Doors Ucllny Tralkrs16.2 1T x6'6" llgltty hellers384 17'x8'6" Winter Equipment storagedonriguration xLPlpll Mower-2 8'x6' '; - � + 0o 1I R � Q 3 d Chipper+Vac 18'x8'6" Clerr --1 B'x 6' Flull Mower-3 8'x6' ,� — + f + r � m_ Qs W a p m � app 1 1I Clemens-2 8'x6' y {t R � a: { �ro ❑ I Post Pounder-1 8'x 6'I ff d O N co .wvW m x4,TtA ..�.._ % ut x k rT Pte[Maeter-1 B'x 6' 1 m m IPat Pounder-2 6x6' m, n Hedger-2 8'x6' n .x p! '� lll4 _ .. Equipment Storage o m — ro NetMester-2 B'x 6' l Leal mover-1 x 6' '+T' ReUnion Spreader-1 8'x 6' y 6 $ $', hador M7040-8 h Back-Up Sprayer-1 26'x B'J 14'x 12'Overhead boors — - BuckeVcrappler- Nitron Spreader-2 B'x B' e Spray Equipment �rT(7 Wood Chipper 12'x 6" N m Storage 1 Perreae oleo-1 6 z s' i 9 Drive-Through 14'x 12' head Doors Equipment Storage Equipment Storage BuckeVGrepPler-2 e'x Double Sliding Doors 14'x 12' rad Doors 14'x 12'q ?hwd Doors _ _ 14'x 12'7�rhead Doors { �•-ti _ Front-Facing West O 1. T � 77 r" a 16 � To Whom It May Concern: Mai era y Bmic I am writing today to express concerns regarding the proposed barn at the property owned by North Fork Viticultural Services,LLC(1000-102-4-6.1). Mr.Ackermann intends to build a 1%story 7000+sq.ft. building with a loft office to operate his vineyard maintenance business at 1350 Alvah's land which has had the development rights sold. Mr.Ackermann, in the application states: "Proposed equipment barn to be built on 23 acres of preserved agricultural land. North Fork Viticultural Services is a growing vineyard management company and requires a barn to store tractors,etc...NFVS manages 10-12 local vineyards totaling hundreds of acres." Mr.Ackermann is not an independent vineyard in need of storage for equipment to maintain his vines. As he stated in the hearing on October 3Id, 2016 there are only 8 acres of grapes on the property. So it seems that his operation is a commercial operation that is in existence for his financial gain. Whether he services vineyard owners, private homes or other commercial operations is irrelevant. Mr.Ackermann is a contractor and operates his business as such.The very words he used to describe his business falls under the definition of a contractor's yard which requires light industrial or commercial property. A few years ago,there was a similar situation just down the road on Alvah's land when Satur Farms was running a similar operation. They were not permitted to operate their business and had to find a more appropriate location to run their business. As a taxpayer and someone who has contributed several times to the land preservation through the tax paid from real estate transactions I do not feel that Mr.Ackermann's use is consistent with goals of land preservation and I am concerned that approving his plan would set a dangerous precedent moving forward. Very Sincerely, A concerned Southold Town resident MAILING ADDRESS. PLANNING SOF so P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI Southold, NY 11971 Chair �� OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR COU Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outholdt ownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 7, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Public Hearing Held Open — Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Route 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: A Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 3, 2016 regarding the above-referenced Amended Site Plan. The Public Hearing was held open. To further help the Planning Board in their review of the application, please provide the following: 1. A floor plan schematic showing tractors and farm implements in building as discussed at the Public Hearing. Any space in the building not used for storage must be appropriately labeled on the plan; 2. Detailed drawings showing second floor and/or loft and their proposed use; 3. A list a of chemicals/herbicides/pesticides proposed to be stored in the building; 4. Number of truck trips per day/week for the proposed business and deliveries of supplies. The next Public Meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board will be held on Monday, November 7, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. Ackermann Ag Building P awe 2 October 7, 2016 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman D C OCT 0 4 2016 Submission Without a Cover Letter Southold Town P}annin�Board Sender: (� ) l aC \C CV- D'SSCK Subject: Ac--Yj2-,,vyv\-or-\Y-\ As �J 2 SCTM#: 1000 - 9 Z Date: ) c) I Continents: U V Dx t 1il.S cj o 0k- Vl �O Rs R . - • !�� � •..r y,` „�+ � � - `# �. y��►� _. "" - .r _ � ' '� may.".,, ti z �, .,�t•�, .,;vim, •�+ - �`'•'s,, �`1�._ ._ �, K ���• f.: `�'��S16 *�� r �ti �y. �R ./ rJ't--' df�'la��d,4r��'�. ,rt��'� 1��'R. y�l• �.?�� .,r•_f � ..� _ !� _ sR» � fir.. � �� .r�t �y •f - �., ,7�'f • 9 - �.S t .# - ...=d` • _ f/ � -_fir- ,- • �, �� '�� �`. .�'., i�f- _ � _���� - f , Fyn. F i r' -.� 'V, '+ � , i. - -. •f'��..."ice� 1'. _ "'.�. _ �•»n� » ♦� '!r �r ��'° ..� - -.tit` �_.Ll •� 7 �ti' • `' - �r�A i _ 1 fes., yyl ; - �- - e"d 1, r� _ .iT y, 1 _� - ems_ y• 1 'n� u,. lyrr '� � _,r' � *G -,� y i.ti1 r: � _ ..� ..� 5 11�t . �r � � - •may !4 t f"- w � r e s'9rY ^moi• ¢J �� <. T - .. - r�`� ' f �� !��.`1� r� Via' �w _ •� -fir :i' 1 } v _ _ . . y h. t 4 a' ► R. :c F Z f e.if a a A' e - - '" -. C . • Y~ "gyp 1 I � fir J J I .�1�'"'t k� r, .. � yl � ���7 �- '•F T��„:r""°';I.t �r y. y �h'.'I ! r i w Av 14 Ilk JJ r 4sr4 7 ti �� ./� h�1 'hVG 9` -�_ ,�����y Yom''Fk� F ��'�ly,. F- �i L. •� y�� r' • " 'fir �'-`� �;"" - _ - . ��}M.., ,+ at rl ♦+fir _ � r .h` ', .. � '' � - _ .+- -.� .. - �+r - ,. t - ' r t { .^ � ` r i,i ��r��As. � •tel ,L � d AW VIP ap ` NOW.1. f J �V IN ARV 40 r - ,,. :��, ,.�` 'x rte. '}�y� � �, '.� - r���.. '.,�y-�1� ,.y[,"����►,• a��a - li,• T Y )3�mai ,• .. �"ate _ ��i. .7 'A /j� � , F��I f jd` R �f f �'`f� 4 � V- ^T. ��--e. � -1�� f 3���•ti. � `-� � �•p � ~�� - • /,° � i: ' ,br � r L' � r'�'T �1 1►,^, � �s�� tt�1r d +`U'e",• , _ �,;.. d�i �-"' r �' .•�-�, �' � �I�r1ir a �s=i���~.i1�' '� f ��. py -01"'IP 21 }�C r ,,} '�i�., r�.c ,r+;:� z.. ` fjylr �•��'k� �`j '� 1 d.� J .- �{� f s r r - fes, - - -�,ti.' .�, -. • r- ..� -� T i >�•,� �- '� _. i-y-[.J - � ire � •�`��+�_� 1 _,, * .. :',�}; .� �W" ,.i ���*�,4 T"�•t `fir. t' {��� ,/•r ti'. .�� � •f r�_• f f - � � «r�rr .ts'✓�.ri� y4..; +�ra� �. .R -{R FYI f .; 1' - ` l,�*� /�lr�r yr4 i'W•� ,�� .�� .��• � _ � W ,t y A • -! '•�' � � � ��t :f• •ri r9s�y. 5 X9 /f`f ,% �j p1;f C. �. C { a,, .1x1• � � •4 � !. � - � ,� �' • � rte` � y, •t W ter ►F _,\y+ G r � •�f`� !1 �• ,�,f ,�iR 1 Y� 4 , 40 �•l i YP+ * w ' 1A IN- OWE ' ,1 v zk 71 14, z 1h R [] r Me f r a - , • .k r, ti. i _s ♦� '� /. tin♦. ^! R OQL— '-'fir 2•�'� - '+d ` 'r- �^L��f � •a •-i� � l - ` Y J r_� �� � _�f is •1.(�'.-ff F ���.(L¢ ���'- �� -��i I�'„j _ ,; +�f-,�err � •.w 71 may: - ~ '?; 1. rl�p- . flt 777 LL 1 4 � � iry.. � i .��.' IS '.tl, I ,�r i�M1�'i� �-�`a ` '��.�•�''- �� ..3pr•�7� ��ys. �SX.��••�Il z�•1- 5" �' j,�.� `_��""j `s' 4 'tit mw IL 4. -s-��_ �'��`� 1 1 �-'r�+ ;:, ;�'• ,� ��� .-+? � � ••_ y °^�� `•` el-� �.,-. _ :rte a?•"' - • � r '.- 5 - A� ... I .. i.. 'sr�W `c �w -•,ri. �£r 7 ( fi `A� ` • i �.• -.t:,• a r �f, '' v �.rs< r�,•a � � � '3J"7a`5'qe r t'.:.. R a►' .y�.r -.r -f_'�.J4.�..r;i, �. -' - �" r A S � w �[, � -f���-�.1 FYI � '/ I J•+� 6. Af _ x � _dt _ ms's• P -1 4 }� .�f- r � � R�^• � is �� a.. �; � ��, r 1 OR 71 PL , 7� 9 • r 'i �: •�'� V "mss ~' ',• ' !!�>_ .-:ads ..*��!r" IWO RA f • �' , �-^.Y ,��*. �- 1^:� ~ ,gym.k'�y �_'Y+1c•{'r--.r,V � I .�Y �' � _ .? I�' >,�..�•�,x ;�1k y���5 •� •,+�/�-• `.—.mat_ ��,` .; _ ' (���. } 1 � S.. -- - Vt -r �/ 1 ,'—.,,��-I�. 4 i~ i.- s?f�•• lc L. -� _. 9• 4s�t .'*a�� .- '�' _ /r i. I �` ,1 r k w FM wr AS TIS Y . J, f a I ~-.,t� 11111. F titi��• r 1 1 ' •��! poi•. • 1� .l,��r ��r .�a ��s,� �Ff JI`1 '(i� :� 1 9 -�,.. ''ty t=<,4 � >ti• u' ,+.^. Ii ` ??1 � ;� + :.'' `131 F• -sem lyis`l,' lio Fr �..'f- sem• � �.r•iL A r i� ..i � � i =- _ � 1/ d .. ' pal 4 # :' � r k�( 1 '.1.�1 ki. ` .•,. d , �.1'..'J'+y, 1.' ,1 `"' .,. CC • 1 \ 'S.,f'. � �f rr' v F yy i.Y�."F'+`5�.}tf� �r Y'•v''r�__ '�, a 1, -1„.♦ � f 44 : Fr.. � Gr',f qF,{•3 7�} f �:�.i lir`.. „�. •ti.J f•r'� _ ! ,� � r' +�'�¢}',��,A' jl� ' 1��!11':.'r. ss'�( t {, y7�N �'�=:�V,���s ':., Ab,�7 I1 ,,,rte `DRi ` ,a ti fff ! • `4A v- 'Ok 10 N6 Ak ho - �,._ 3 Not- —� _a y f �r _ `d�" � ..`mss� �. .,� � �y4i.y . L,• ,,;� � �. • ii r Zlrx 4, NX, tom. �C - �J i gy, ll � 'Jr ,�;� +.R .r1� •e r - �✓+iF 9r n f ` � �` i'% "xNIM '` � '�� -,i _ � �'"_`.• � � ,. ��- 'x,03 r- _ _ �1: ' �'�-+• � f_ rte-' -� •-.. • 'Y • J .,�' �ZTY'�" � �. ,-�..- Yf-1'. Yr• '..moi � �; � +�! �� .- `�� ems. ,r. �.,. .. i.� l ? r I _ � rf ',�• _fir... f ] spm r �5 OCR�, r f 1, \ 4 `,fir tly"� � � 'I/ �' r+. ��� � � - ..� ,� •ter` +' � g,�-C i• '�,�Z�3 ,�J ,f _ { � _tee �` �� [ F �f �� � ��� �"■�Jfl 'fid� .. r ..J• SL - y • ry Y - lit°'t. `4�`�-•s ���� tip. "'y'�`��' i v�� 4. � �? '.� i� �` f� y ..... .rte ri. n e� 4 , r` r �, �i''a _ f�'•`.'ifr�,`. — 1 r - � +'� {: �s 1�! �. F�ty iii� � `s�`� t ��!'.,""" •. r. f !� •q �" ti.� d f9 1 4 ''F ,`+ 1 � �' { _SPP• � it � � + , '� " y�""���v r ,� rS '"£: � f � ti Y y ti.. •� ,.� a �'- I,°'' t •+Tlb '`^, 0. rf.!• .; L±� ' �,. r (' ,.� �„ 'r� •"� iY' _. Vit~ 41 al 1.4 ads, '1�✓' - .^ }}44 y �`�. _ k .s-..+s"� •, � '.� � �i\\\ �}'l L'ti IM1 /Ytv r -'t !.- r``+' y�. an �• i e rl �� • " � r 1 yr y r� •.� r k,\ _ � _ �,.-. l Z ! i rx• �. \ 1'i'f f� r t , s a , . 1. . . `� a�y��7 I+� 1 \ SCR ` • �'� ',�„'1. , A*•1 , `� -Ii ,f 4e l .gut " �A •.� . A401 - �, r �f_I i NOW 1 1 A i a� f i .lam � - � A �.M�I/ I '! •+fir.. !^ 1w ' } ' �1,1 ti ' • i S'SR1 ! Tr'• ,1 r.y�. w�i�yiF.��w, '1� W . 1 �'+'^� ""'r � '`��'i it�'+ 'r '.��� f.��J ,� ., Y ��.4 ._�,� rl`. >s �Y : � � �►. � .� �' *:r`r e,., � Ji i A Yt '..s1C^r �, J,: .,, �, � �;•a . i4.' '.64ti1� 11P #10 f . ti r Vol,lo it r Y! r It .• r • ,� rr -. �i ` ,r '.� ', sPs`.; `ry �•y ,e_� . - �- f — r_ 9r, AV �� �l + rs t' �_, .P'/•�� `w-. �•� •ter - �., �r�Frn ��� ���� } r LA a Elizabeth Thompson, Chairperson ' ' Town Hall Annex Reynolds duPont,Jr. � d,y" 54375 Route 25 Ronald McGreevy " PO Box 1179 Nicholas Planamento Southold,NY 11971 Mark Schwartz ` Stephen Geraci Telephone: (631)765- 1892 Patricia Butler '�� Fax(631)765-6641 James Garretson `° southoldtown.northfork.net Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:00p.m., September 22, 2016 Town Hall Annex Executive Board Room Members Present: Elizabeth Thompson, Chairperson;Ron McGreevy;Mark Schwartz;Stephen Geraci;James Garretson; Brian Cummings,Town Planner;and Elizabeth Cantrell,Secretary The minutes for the August 18, 2016 meetings were approved. Introduction: All applicants will give a presentation consisting of drawings,exterior materials samples and other information required by the Planning Department to the Coirunittee. The Committee will ask questions and make suggestions as part of a general discussion with each applicant. Final recommendations from the ARC will be presented to the Planning Board in the ARC Meeting Minutes,and be made part of the Planning file for that application. The Planning Board will consider these recommendations,together with all comments from other agencies,and provide the applicant with a comprehensive written list of its requested revisions. New Site Plan Applications: • FOX LANE RESIDENCES SCTM# 1000-12-1-1.2 Lily Rutherfurd, Principal Architect and Sean Dugan,Architect of Kinlin Rutherfurd Architects presented this site plan for the construction of four (4) tenant-occupied affordable housing units in three structures: two at 1,282 sq. ft., one at 1,784 sq.ft., and one at 507 sq.ft. on 0.75 acres in the Affordable Housing District Zoning District,Fishers Island. Located: Fox Lane,Fishers Island. The Committee reviewed the application and is approving it as submitted. Motion made and seconded. Amended Site Plan Applications, • ACKERMANN AGRICULTURAL BARN SCTM# 1000-102-4-6.1 No representative for the applicant was present at the meeting. Brian Cummings,Town Planner presented this application to the Committee. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the Agricultural-Conservation Zoning District. Located: 1350 Alvas Lane,Cutchogue. The Committee reviewed the application and is recommending that, due to the very large mass of the proposed structure, the applicant move the building further back from the public road. An approximate 100 foot setback from the public road is recommended,which will be in line with the setback of the neighboring residence. Motion Made and Seconded. • LUCAS FORD SCTM# 1000-59-3-32.1 Howard Lucas,Owner and George Suddell,Architect presented this amended site plan for a proposed 80'x115' (9,200sq.ft.) service area addition and alterations to the existing 80'x150' (12,OOOsq.ft.) car dealership with 189 parking stalls on.4.1 acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District,Southold. Located: 3245 Horton Lane,Southold. The Committee reviewed the application and is recommending that the applicant move forward with the current amended site plan submitted today so that the applicant can approach Ford Motor Company with the design. The Committee continues to recommend the following: 1. There is an attempt to break down the massing and add details to the original proposal. There is a more appropriate scale to newer design. 2. The design would be more cohesive if one style were chosen and adhered to throughout...i.e. either shingle style, craftsmen style or Victorian etc. 3. The swag roof with flagpole is not compatible with the nearby pitched roof. A pyramidal roof with straight matching pitch would be more suitable. (Is there to be habitable space inside this tower or is it open to below?) The Committee looks forward to a future submission containing proposed elevations,lighting, landscaping,etc. 1 fiz 'leth Cantrell, A.R.C. Secretary - 2 Submission Without a Cover Letter . _._ . __I OC 1 4 2M Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000 - n -2- Date:Date: Comments: AAo .ut G r • • am ■ Ill- ME,:i MIL pu 1,2, 3. t�tiifrf ❑Agent Print your name address on the reverse X ❑Addrtrtw v,, so that we can return the card to you. �• — or on the card to the back of the mailpiece, B. He t�lv �9 N f'r�+;led Name) ��H'�fl f of ��Otv � e front if space permits, -m AtticD. Is rf�'sltv�f ar'Jdoess different fu flb4 1. � yes Addressed to: A� If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No � r sJ 3. Service Type L3 Priority Mail Express® ��� �IN� �1111111111 ��� ��Ill1111111111111111 ��� �I44 (IY�� �� ❑Adult Signature [1 Registered Mail- El ailT" ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery n 1 19 El Certified Mail Restricted Delivery El Return Receipt for 9590 940 52050011 ��_'� 6 ❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise ,m [3 Signature Confirmation 7 015 064 ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery E:1 Signature Confirmation 0 0 0 01 5 4 2 4 2 014 sred Mail Restricted Delivery suured Mail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 0-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt ® ® • • • • • ■ Complete items 1,2, and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Agent t so that we can return the card to you. ❑Addressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B 'rff ffbv sd byf�rPnilerf aurae) C Date of Delivery or on the front If space permits. f� � r Y If YEsa �#Il �y r� rr� � �. T., Article Addressed to: D. Is deliveryalb r sf�[f�f b�t6xn item—1,?""[]Yes Ql ❑ No (( �aM slill OWS La vii %,"(w 2 8 4 it X> . 1173 3. Service Type ❑Priority Mail Express® @ �� �� Ill ❑Adult Signature ❑Registered Ill Imu 4 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Mail Restricted ❑Certified Mail® Delivery 9590 9 4 01 0 011 5205 6 0 61 2 0 Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ;6 Return Merchandise ipt for ❑Collect on Delivery - — ❑Si nature Confirmationrn, r-- niicp label) El on Delivery Restricted Delivery 9 a n insured Mail ❑Signature Confirmation 0 0 01 5424 2021 ;ured Mall Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery a15 ;er$500) PS Form 3811,April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt �y OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. SPIRO �� � � `�' Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 54375 State Route 25 Ih melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road& Youngs Avenue) �r Southold, New York Telephone(631)765-5711 0 Facsimile(631)765-6640 +� �" MAILING ADDRESS: 1J P.O. Box 1179 ,. � Southold, NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 03 20 To: Brian Cummings Planner Flm0ig ftard From: Melissa Spiro Land Preservation Coordinator Date: October 3, 2016 Re: SCTM #1000-102.-4-6.1 North Fork Viticultural Services LLC Site Plan Application for Ackerman Agricultural Barn The Land Preservation Committee reviewed the September 19, 2016 referral from the Planning Board at the September 27, 2016 Land Preservation Committee meeting. A proposal presented by Mr. Ackerman dated February 24, 2016 was reviewed by the Land Preservation Committee in March 2016 as described in the attached March 7, 2016 letter to Mr. Ackerman. The site plan that was presented to the Planning Board for a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural structure building differs from that reviewed by the Land Preservation Committee in March 2016. The recorded easement for this property restricts the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as defined in Chapter 70 of the Town Code. The Land Preservation Committee members reviewed the proposed use (agricultural storage barn) and found the use to be consistent with the recorded easement; therefore, provided all proposed uses remain for agricultural production as defined within Chapter 70, the proposed use is consistent with the recorded easement. The committee did not review the size or location of the proposed building. If additional changes to use are made during the site plan review process, please feel free to refer this back to the Land Preservation Committee for review. encs.: 3/7/2016 letter to Ackerman recorded easement err. OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. SPIRO �w'+ '°� Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR ^r� "� �� ', 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiroOtown.southold,ny.us (corner of Main Road& Youngs Avenue) Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILING ADDRESS: 9 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re; Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann:. At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated)were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "L" shaped Barn building. b. Workshop w/ Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "L" shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. During meetings we had prior to the Committee review, you clarified that the "Home in Phase 2" was not proposed to be located within the area subject to Town Easement, and would be proposed only on an adjacent 0.35± acre lot known as SCTM# 1000-102.-4-9.1. This lot is not subject to Town Easement, and you are looking to purchase and merge this property with the property subject to easement. If the purchase and merger occur, you are proposing to construct the house, and to attach same to the Barn/Workshop area, by constructing the additional building area shown as proposed "Garage w/Office Above." Due to the fact that the "Home in Phase 2" is not proposed within the area subject to Easement, the Committee did not review the "Home in Phase 2." In addition, the proposed "Garage wl Office Above" was not reviewed or approved, as this part of the structure is not part of the current application since the adjacent lot has not been purchased or merged with the subject property. The Committee's review consisted of review of the "L" shaped Agricultural Barn building (estimated from floor plan as being a building of approximately 96±' x 47' and 41'x 40) and the separate Pump House structure (16' x 20') shown as including the following uses proposed for agricultural purposes: • Equipment Storage. • Workshop w/Small Bath • Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed The recorded easement for this property restricts the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as defined in Chapter 70 to the Town Code. Section 25-50-C. (2) (3] requires that the Committee serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights have been acquired by the Town. The Land Preservation Committee members concluded their review and found that the agricultural uses described above, shown as located within the "L" shaped Barn building and' the Pump House, are agricultural uses consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement. Please note that the Committee's approval of this use within the easement does not mean that such use or buildings will be approved or permitted by other departments or agencies. The Committee's approval allows you to proceed with pursuing any applicable approvals that are required by Town Code. If you have any questions, please call, Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Land Preservation Coordinator enc.: application w/attachments cc: Building Department w/enc. Planning Board w/ enc. s � OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A.SPIROw Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (comer of Main Rd&Youngs Ave) m 1 Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 �i r7" Facsimile(631)765-6640 t6lr r% MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.Box 1179 5 9t Southold,NY 11971-0959 J DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REQUEST FOR AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ON LAND SUBJECT TO TOWN DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EASEMENT Tax Map No. 1000- IV A I am the owner of the property described below and on which the Town purchased a development rights/conservation easement on or about-......................___-, w .,(date). Name of Owner(please print): Name(s) of previous owner: IK (if applicable) Mailing Address: ,: . .. m Phone Number: e-mall Address: Property Location: «<.... y i _... -_ ..7 Ct�►r�' �°; M � � ���rlculturstructure� � g proposed: L�ttype,size, a use o each *Attach location map (survey, tax map, or sketch plan) showing placement area of agricultural structure(s), distance from property boundary lines,and any readily available information relating to your request. You may talk with the Coordinator at (631)765-5711 to discuss questions or to arrange to participate in any of the regular meetings of the Land Preservation Committee, Applicant Date Please return the completed form with attachments to: Town of Southold-Land Preservation Department *All attachments must be signed and dated by property owner. goy GRAPI '%, «Pe Amp v or �I al Ism I. ¶A W PWO Height W12 Pitch Piod Scmd ma Baftn Skilng mew pbof CancRft Floors 14 I. H sm�aw-vo phas.2 --——------------- DM.A� o p 07 s /001-1'17 (?7I�1�/u� stere I poy, 11946KO75 ; STA �� ' a e � Number of Ptalye.4 FED 18 IM TORRENS EDWARD i`'. i'_� 'iAINE CUR% OF Serialp„ °'tl`A SUFFOLK COUNTY Certificate g _ ........_ '"=WD Prior Cif.8 28626 Deed/Mortgage Insummcnl Deed!Mortgage Tax S-,up Recording 0 tiling Stamps q FEES.._�.....�.�..� Page/Filing Fee 3 ' ...... MongagcAmt. Handling . ., ............. I. Basic Tax TP-584 _ ... 2. Additional Tax _ Noiauon _._,......_ ._ Sub Total EA-5217(County) Sub Total SpecJAssit. dd ...��.m!.. EA-5217(State) Spec./Add. _... R.P.T.S.A. _ CNp TOT.MTO.TAX Dual Town Dual County Comm.of Ed. d ......,,..5 ,. i a Held for Apportionment M .t .. Affidavits q. x Transfer Tax tJ. 7i MansionTax Certified Copy p The property covered by Ibis mortgage is or Reg Copy .,. will be improved by a one or two family .. '.'.,`.`..,. dwellingonly. Sub Total '"- YES or NO- Other ... ....._. If NO.see appropriate tax clause on page 8 GRAND TOTAL -of this instrument. S Real Property Tax Service Agency Verification 17T-Title Company Information 2 Dist. Section Block Lot It ®/1100 02 t/,DO/ Company Name _m.,.. ........ . _m. ... . f /000 /az eo oVap ap6,001 705'8' Zo Title Number ht Is L l;PAID BY: Commonwealth Land Cash Check A-- Charge Title Insurance Company Payer same as R&R (3)rifd f fl2 1 a dia, New Yo k 1 722a1 Highway ADI>RE :: 777-NAME:6'l"�1117 � RECORDItf:1"'lli�ihl TOs/ /: //7 Z .. (A1111RI4SI g Suffolk County Recording Endorsement P; This pago fonns pan of the allachec9m.�w ( 1`°I 4 It Ysl"I'YP d / made.by: F OF INS, ll MEN°1') al's..+',...L, "j,I � The premises herein is situated in ISL" .4C? sJL ✓�"arI�1I 1,3 COUNTY.NEWYORK. TO In the Township of.e, In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of BOXES S TgRU 9 MUST BE TYPED OR PRIMPED INBLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR FILING. i N o- DEED OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 0T_ THIS INDENTURE, made this 5th day of February , 1999 BETWEEN Frances Zelinski As Executrix of the Estate of Sophie Kaloski, a\.LH C ie 1�alcEl_' -i deceased, residing at 695 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, New York party of the first part, 15�4 P 1 qZ5 AND the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation having its office and principal place of business at Main Road, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, party of the second part; WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Five Dollars and No Cents ($517,275.00) lawful money of the United States and other good and valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, DOES HEREBY GRANT AND RELEASE unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever, THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, by which is meant: the permanent legal interest and right, as authorized by section 247 of the New York State General Municipal Law, as amended, to permit, require or restrict the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as that term is presently defined in Chapter 25 of the Town • Code of the Town of Southold, and the right to prohibit or restrict the use of the premises for any purpose other than its present state of use, agricultural production. to the property described as follows: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: File No. 70983209 SCHEDULE A PARCEL Y Al-l-that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being of Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of SUFFOLK and State of New York: BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly side of land now or formerly of Droscosld, Cassidy and Vallenti; RUNNING THENCE along the westerly side of Alvah's lane south 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds East, 1824,66 feet; RUNNING THENCE south,08 degrees 37 minutes 27 seconds East, 204.21 feet; RUNNING THENCE south 44 degrees 45 minutes 21 seconds West, 217.35 feet; RUNNING THENCE north..A degrees�minutes.2'r seconds East,410.61 feet; RUNNING THENCE south A-3:degreesX7 minutes 4*seconds Zast, 91.24 feet; RUNNING THENCE south 43 degrees 22.minutes 39 seconds East, 226.65 feet to land now or formerly of Doris Tynlec and Michael Capuana; RUNNING THENCE along said lands south 44 degrees 45 minutes 21 seconds West, 82.73 feet; RUNNING "ITIEN'CE along said lands and lands now or formerly Eugenia B. Kopustka south 40 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds Eqt271.50 feet to lands now or formerly of Petrol Stations Limited; , RUNNING THENCE along said lands south 47 degrees 48 minutes 31 seconds West, 360.84 feet to lands now or formerly of Gristina Vineyard's,LLC; RUNNING THENCE along said lands three(3) courses and distances: (1) North 45 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds West, 888.23 feet; (2) North 44 degrees 41 minutes 37 seconds West, 836.26 feet; (3) North 47 degrees 00 minut67 seconds West,506.88 feet to lands now or formerly of Paulette Satur Mueller, Eberhard Mueller and the County of Suffolk; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly the following two(2) courses and distances: (1) North 43 degrees 25 minutes 20 seconds East, 329.27 feet; (2) North 42 degrees 24 minutes 08 seconds West, 45286 feet to land now or formerly Droscoski, Cassidy and Vel'ent first above mentioned; RUNNING THI=NCE along lands, Orth 32 degrees 41 minutes 54 seconds East, 343.75 feet to the westerly side of Alvah's Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. 0 Date Printed February 5, 1999 NO.810 P.4/5 PARCEL II File No. 70983209 • ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying, and being at Cutchogue in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Alvah's Lane distant northerly 1175 feet more or less as measured along same from the intersectlon of the easterly„slda of Alvah°s Lane with the northerly side of Main Road; said point also being the northerly line of land now or formerly of Chester and Irene Sawastynowlez; RUNNING THENCE along the easterly side of Alvah's Lane the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) North 43,degrees 27 minutes 14 Seconds West, 620.63 feet; (2) North 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds 4.2'5 feet to land now or formerly Edward R. Grohoski; i C> RUNNING THENCE!Ilorth 43 degrees.Ylminutes 13 seconds East, 150.00 feet; RUNNING THENCE north 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds West, 100.00 feet to lands now or formerly of William 1. Kerrigan; RUNNING THENCE along said landsyrth 43 degrees 05 minutes 13 seconds East, 277.60 feet; RUNNING THENCE:north 47 degrees 11 minutes 27 seconds West, 236.26 feet to lands now or formerly of Franklin Slachy and Malcolm Blachy; RUNNING THENCE along said lands(haft 08 degrees 04 minutes 53 seconds East, 394.88 feet to lands shown an the Map of Highland Estates, leap No. 6537;. SUNNING THENCE along said lands south 48 degrees 27 minutes 00 seooAeast, 439.27 feet to lands shown on the *Map of Crown'r1nd Lane", Map No. 6289; RUNNING THENCE along'said landq,' outh 47 degrees 26 minutes 10 seconds East, 1415,78 feet; RUNNING THENCEuti 46 degrees 12 minutes 00 seco4est 348,55 feet to lands now or formerly Michael R. Crosser,and Diane Byrn Crosser; RUNNING THENCE along said lands and lands now or formerly of James R. Duffy and Linda A. Duffy 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 274.24 feet; .� ,i rth 43 degrees RUNNING THENC:I °'s uth 46 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconV'West, 303,60 feet; RUNNING THEN north 43 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds West, 334.04 feet; RUNNING THENCE(Pbuth 49 degrees 35 minutes 50 seconds West, 200.36 feet to the easterly side of Alvah's Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. kcd onveyancIng only, if Together with all right, title and Interest of, In and to any streets and roads ed to be conveyed, { abutting the above described premises, to the center line thereof. Data Printed February 5, 1999 TOGETHER with the non-exclusive right, if any, of the party of the first part as to the use for ingress and egress of any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof. TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, insofar as the rights granted hereunder are concerned. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said Development Rights in the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns, forever; • AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. The party of the first part, as a covenant running with the land in perpetuity, further covenants and agrees for the party of the first part, and the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the party of the first part, to use the premises on and after the date of this instrument solely for the purpose of agricultural production. The party of the first part, as a covenant running with the land in perpetuity, further covenants and agrees for the party of the first part, and the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the party of the first part, that the parcels of real property described herein are open agricultural lands actually used in bona fide agricultural production as defined in General Municipal Law section 247. AND the party of the first part, covenants in all aspects to comply with Section 13 of the Lien Law, as same applies with said conveyance. The definition of"Agricultural Production: as defined in Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the Southold Town Code is as follows: " Agricultural Production- shall mean the production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock and livestock products, but not land or portions thereof used for processing or retail merchandising of such crops, livestock or livestock products. Land used in "agricultural production" shall also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock barns, irrigation systems, and any other structures used exclusively for agricultural purposes." THE party of the first part and the party of the second part do hereby convenant and agree in perpetuity that either of them or their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives or assigns, shall only use the premises on and after this date for the purpose of such agricultural production and the grantor covenants and agrees that the underlying fee title may not be subdivided into plots by the filing of a subdivision map pursuant to Sections 265, 276 and 277 of . .............. • the Town Law and Section 335 of the Real Property Law, or any of such sections of the Town or Real Property Law or any laws replacing or in furtherance of them. The underlying fee may be divided by conveyance of parts thereof to heirs and next of kin, by will or by operation of law, or with the written recordable consent of the Purchaser. This covenant shall run with the land in perpetuity. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the sale of the underlying fee or any portion thereof. THE word "party" shall be construed as if it reads "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. • THE party of the first part, the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the party of the first part covenants and agrees that it will (a) not generate, store or dispose of hazardous substances on the premises, nor allow others to do so; (b) comply with all of the Environmental Laws; allow party of the second part and its agents reasonable access to the premises for purposes of ascertaining site conditions and for inspection of the premises for compliance with this agreement. This covenant shall run with the land in perpetuity. THE party of the first part, its heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the party of the first part covenants and agrees that it shall indemnify and hold party of the second part and any of its officers, agents, • employees, and, their respective successors and assigns, harmless from and against any and all damages, claims, losses, liabilities and expenses, including, without limitation, responsibility for legal, consulting, engineering and other costs and expenses which may arise out of(1) any inaccuracy or misrepresentation in any representation or warranty made by seller in this agreement; (2) the breach or non-performance of any convenants required by this agreement to be performed by the party of the first part, either prior to or subsequent to the closing of title herein; or (3) any action, suit, claim, or proceeding seeking money damages, injunctive relief, remedial action, or other remedy by reason of a violation or non-compliance with any environmental law; or the disposal, discharge or release of solid wastes, pollutants or hazardous substances; or exposure to any chemical substances, noises or vibrations to the extent they iarise from the ownership, operation, and/or condition of the premises prior to or subsequent to the execution of the deed of Development Rights. This covenant shall run with the land in perpetuity. AS set forth in Chapter 25 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS acquired by the Town pursuant to the provisions of that chapter shall not thereafter be alienated, except upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Town Board after a public hearing and upon the approval of the electors of the Town voting on a proposition submitted at a special or biennial town election, No subsequent amendment of the provisions of this subsection shall alter the limitations imposed upon the alienation of development rights i • acquired by the Town prior to any such amendment. This covenant shall run with the land in perpetuity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first written above. Seller: Estate of Sophie Kaloski By. Frances Zelinsci As executrix Purchaser: Town of By:_ ?4& \AjL,-+A--\ 9, opoQC XVvTr SVPFnV1s0p\ • 11946pC 075 UNIFORM FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT • State of New York ss.: County of On the day of ill the year LID h public W l—,efore Inc, the utidersigited, a 00t XT and for said stat , personally appeared1�1-et,-?ejS zellio �)ersorlajly own to ate ox proved (Owe on 111le basis of satisfactory evidcm�To c the indiVidUal(s) whose 11a'I'lle(s) is (are) subscribed to the withinB,trujIlent and acknowledged to Inc that he/she/they executed the saine in his1herld].e jr capacity(jes), and that by his/hcr/theil, signature(s) on the instrulnerit, tile individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the ins timirri int„ e KAREN' J, HAGEN No,,iry PUNic, of Novo York No.4927'029 00MIfied;,,SuPollk Counry k%'T0 21, j*-ZzV2V UNIFORM FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of New York ss.: County ofsaFAct, On the 5�4 dayof P- 4, in the yea r beBare nie, the undersh,iied a notary public in and for said state, personally appeared a, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instralne-M • KAREN J. HAGEN Notary Public,1-3-tato of Now York No.X4927029 Qualified;n Suffolk County Commission Expires Murch 21,M— Y Michaelis, Jessica From: Cummings, Brian A. . . Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 9:45 AM To: Michaelis, Jessica �G°°,1 �� Ui '>>> Subject: FW: SCTM #1000-102-4-6.1; ' n V"dmflll'g Board -----Original Message----- From: Howard Simon [mailto:obsail@vahoo.com] Sent:Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:35 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Subject: SCTM #1000-102-4-6.1; After reviewing the proposed site plan SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1; on Alvahs Lane, it would appear to us that the size of the proposed building is excessively large for this site. It has come to our knowledge that a previously approved plan for this site included a smaller building further set back from the road. We would favor a return to that plan. Unfortunately we are unable to attend the October 3rd meeting as we are out of town on that date. Sincerely, Lorraine and Howard Simon, 3290 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, NY. I Submission Without a Cover Letter E Sender: �I ��k�iw6dC"Fown .,. Subject: �Q� SCTM#: 1000 - 0-2- Date: Date: ot I �j D / I 1p Comments: ���� S�l p ^ .a. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: V I Subject: AC.Uylwaywl /lk-C- (ba- t'1 SCTM#: 1000 - 10 a_ /+ _ Date: I 1 Comments: AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as Pva t Lollo �w by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the p in place for at least seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on mined l ^jl 1 have sent notices by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return attached, to the owners of re d of every property receipt cards ofwhichVajj� yapre pttay ,rl O2_ ,) hich is across on, wh"ch abuts and ever ro e�rt "w (41 itl JAJ Your Name (print) " . . Signature u. 4x . .... Address bfoy 10 1/ Date Notary Public 1011 MARINA KOKIaNOB jjd"Punk-Stift of Now York No.01K061 91941 awitm in Suffolk County By ComkggWon logium Aug.25,2M PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon Fri. 9/30/16 Re: Pro osed Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn SCTM#s: 1000-102-4-6.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday October 3, 2016, 6:02 p.m. Notice to Adjacent Property Owners Ackermann Ag Barn SCTM# 102.-4-6.1 1350 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 1. 1.02.4-545 64-0 15 lA-* ,-2. 102.4.-&I 0-4-0 Qtc��00-- i (Q D b rel I -1 102..--4.-9.1 C- r C) 0 5 GL&-q,,tuw -4. 1.02.-4.-7.2 P - 5. 102..4-.5.3 (DRT) CR Q�- 2-5 6� (D(",� I I "I I -6. 101-74 ("FOSRB) 7 SOU-�*� C, r,4,, -7. 1.02.-7.-2 L &C. bo�A_a_n 3 0 S ("OLI, bx,fr,f)c� - 8. 102.-.7.-3 V S Lk,,t,, C)7_,ew�6 k_� fD C 6? Z 3 -- 9., 1.02.-7.-4Jz)VNrk,30r% p--795 T - 10. 102..-7-.5 (PSP) L-, P. i�:clsDmI 00 q I e>6 1 -7 1.1_ 101-8.35 (PUTO) "Foto- 9) ol d 71 12. 102,-8..36 ('1"0SRB)'-r­,-, 0 ( 'OD 1') q K,Ca 0&lam A I v o-K LLM 19 3S- -14. 1.09."1-24.2 6D -14, 1.09.-1.-24,3 Cc4-Cx. GOJ`AI0 -15. 109.2-18 rIA64 19" Ava-hls L-n CAf -4L- -17, 1.09.-2.2.2 0 C-cssef­ CAL I -18. 1.09..-2.42.5 4- 5 Sc-cL-LA-a- 7 Ln I 3r q -19. 109..-.2-.114 �_,LJ TrO Psi ,5- Cs-IAAjr\_ L_zLw-jc�(_ L_#—� ems— DRT—Southold Town Development Rights TOSRB —Town of Southold Recharge Basin PSP-Private Subdivision Park PUTO-Public Town Open Space (passive use) I�aA uu°° uu� muioi ww� f ww mil � R mM �� � u ru ni 0971 07. 0 Ln Fala t�il,Yvla 4 Y{=tii t(Nrre,J Pwcr suYUX'urrrr �t r ii IR tlmo 11Y udpe QPtivawup,.,opU,U r., rl p � Iw�Bttr'rrb ulw C3 m O M 0 P1 .. .... fmur 4 q o 0.47 09/19/20,16 ...0 C3 Ln qµ tt��U� � II ml1�i1p11�1 lo1�u I�r u "mow* Cl) ■ ■ ■ T L w.mmmi0000u p Q O i P.If �11 s, O W ? 3 Ln i �.U mm=— ns`'� CA a l �mll =Dr '*O N 00 0 uuu�mmmmwu C N m m �mlllll N N O ��� a O i CD vi wxn iC.,v a!w p .�.. N '`C3 I wwmm SY C O_ N C) C3w CMD h a N vO 3wmwmmmiooiii rfl Q p, a 'coLin n w :: 0 CL Lrl GIr) CD o Rl �mlllll =)- ,0 Eli ii IIIII�N ' ,.G' uwuumw0000n O No ULpr... I uwvwmmmoiiw � — C < m� VGMm uu° uiiiiumuru CD a � iii ILII �� � u w ,, p i000000000000ii a Lo D 'n m m iii' �Ui ��imihi m ,. _.. —� �' r iwrlrYf iab d�7d tlP ai ru � $3.3 c c g o .,T'r.,,, .,.,,�.,., ,,, . w ° d ®..... pvevV mut Vfi;ra,teo rl Ir�uiula nr, Ctim, :'rPtt a �' to(A ~.. ,,,rrr���m.. ;au L.fl I,GadM arrva r-a a e7 0 is. 9dkb� i7 N 0 3 3 ��m ai r gym° �`tl'TA, Ctmu, 1—q 3VB+afwrrrru IY'Nmw a IIoV V'ml a t�urmNu " ,U k ,„ �a � r gni pr"6uViul>" Il,;gir Vuai Vttl �$mm —®cc m< m"1P 0IpAdult SlluiwWr uVOqmlrr�I ""�1 wlraand Ddlwron$ M4rkr r 0 ai tfxt 47 w m 4 a 1: 2 n"" ..0 lfoUw6�`B'auwraU! XaryandUrerce� ......... � P�' z o N ,CD o $6.47 3 _. m �� m z N OEl ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ 3 �r� """s I .b ,&�f� e% w °a ""tway tl Ln �:� 3 a.A. 3 Wn w �,.,.� �ocnv�mmv�o�ov W �. N to m m n '.a=mi Sj <N .m. r c c mm .Z m m qv,� N �� � � OON� fl � a � � uIp1111i1111111 O 31 3 Qya k.0 tna.. r CD > > T v d � ■ ■ ■ " c, D O O 03 � �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU �e > O �,+ 3 I�y;U muw umu 3 Lr. wuNxnnnnnnoiii .00 L 'O s uuuo iiiii W' W cZ IIIPPNNNPN tl,I ""�^d"--^w (D S �L C 0 OEMsa. m m u u u mumm W,. — u ■u m V1, a m can �m"w ��I �� D �, µ O N a "ptl ,9 r �� �_....... �• p c a iv � � o � ��� ' tt ruril4itt Q 1YwIII V ml+t N mU m a N fUI�U � �„ ,,�� � � � � ma r, 3q um000000000ii N �I tlW&rk(Qarl ur.utto, U orati Por�.'ak » 2106 I*, O W ru 11 ramWn V Vumr Apl QIQI mIttOCIA1 0 � � � ry ^� Z (J7 2 CM y 0 p,to r-� Ilshmin VpaacMIJIJA(GI m AIDI ICI �'........ na I�u'GY4CflW1irM.tt'�& N Q„A'tt UIUIIIII II O Y 0 C3 �,�(;doutt ed VWsIll IN'U ttuticled DOWNY "� .. ,��w r � Uln�tlWf�� G I ru N �• ',,_.•••IIIIIIIII N `�G 3 O gttouYY-HIIUumm0.o'uaPV Biul'o'a � I�� �ff� 3 C (D C) v O q Ifkia^uPou Cr&mmaU Tromm'IVerrvmmm°'r N N ••^ nomooi000in Q1 (D ttVuuVil V(nruuoaftWirwmCO _ �pllll IIIIIIIIII ,.WQd.N O 01 47 o = ......, . ...... 09/'1 o O 0 tlmu�w PIosblgsp�DwonU U � cn Wo ��U ��u�U � N D rq C3IN- ��m ask tt r y gy v Q.YrQ �' arra .; �, .:ar.Ua,..ui. "-Q� d✓M Uri �. -G rm "wra° �r' u ui m r �i lil ui ul" ui " �Y ' 9 N .I, m m Iuu i mu I� ID` w w r1 Y � � ill fa CID if a O ■ ■ ■ r �,M Cl) L-' ODU)3, Un mmmm 0 -ons a _ �3 _ ® S ! I I 1 1 1 d l p m ��_ ESME GO Er 3 D n.D a_ ..___ � 7 n �'� 7X GWI co(Xs d�q�d� 7J £? � �� O D .. w.�< :��mcg,Wi i,r i7 a .....�.. z awn — a m F y � �4� � 3 wv CID -,= SCID IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII D C3 D O '� Imluuwuw l� °m..""°"' CCL �;a ((D cn tl _ , Z °� ,(o N C3 N j a O ....n _._. (D ,a. CL cn o wx��� m a a cn Lrl N LIQ .�-—7— (fin W Z gym' 3 wtn N rU n. 4vUr"R IIIIIUU .�" N a 7 co .9, mioiiwuwmuu 3 O o IIIIIIIIIIIIII (D .< _r_ O N E3 N C C) wu i 'U — < C), n CIDCD u uma lU (m8 uuuu mi umu Lr oiim El El 0 mIJ � ILII m�u�i�i viii liiii u i uu iiu o u ❑❑❑❑ca co n� rui��ppm y� yM� y�,p• �µ�W�pp tli' .c .l C C (D 9aD M1,mbA98 � Iw N.: '& ittyn cn(n3, }, " GmittYHNS+r�ih..GuBrdIQ6-rur..".,mx�� ... .. .. ..............3.30 0 ....... m m >Ln 6✓Ct tt lr,'s)rvit ttm�1',Q ci6,o'm iia,. daea�r.eu mtt iP as W r r r7p... (DCD � O C r3 []Iiattuuuuo VPow+caaVO"a'@QamllWerNuuv111110CD �, pR `ttWrouagerua'Wr' CLC3 m 8 < .�. p m��uuc o aWuu crrn�o re cu�unu' � + c� v m a m O ��WumrOWlpimmquu gvuuu m0 W (�D Z� �, 0 q6R ihft igintUum!a P'Yealdr d11 DI11Wolly„U ...... -- - m a m � e ma v m 3 e (� 1;AsD �L� 47 m acn m .� uroRo-pU Q' iaflea6�tt rrH��6 tl'�'r� � 09/19,12014' 3 v. O ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ 3 �Dcnw��vmmv 9 Er:-��--9.R .. .. ....................................... ............. 0 M.ot a (D a Q ov�e' a 1 c v n0 CL CID n .m E K w. ❑ G9 '��. m ❑ ❑ M1 3 <. w d. o N _. UV UCID ,o- � ��, � � ,, � � ■ IIII IIIIIIII VIII �� w * — ,- , -0 � wi S c • °9 ,..,... O E S K erq p MOO our e' gyp ^^ i tl a 00 w ... w re a O • I tl w 3 3 n P0iP4nir�9 tl rep b ru $3.30 qa m14 • a� � � , tll"7 w A^(ip x a o Ntd 0 &@&YGi q Y,t f dnt,�a a¢t d�e s ti lMk,„ Earp P v� [ 1 a �""' �^°"-1 N C d N � p�'Ywxdauu III Y to arppatVOo d aunptl $ cPa N pll,oWuuuuupi wlpaPQrvtl&OmnV:p "m - W rl%FP tl�r x<t pau mm a a p V�qu.°,�m,�up�u,�li4,JuuYpuw� u: uar�p�rollovel yl 9(0 himn VY�waroroad P"Jas9Y OlY W O (U uYP i01,s4uuoeh q lump l ... •* 0 p #(1 yll PrB y g C3 i t 3 c • rp �&�w&IfnnaaN d��a�u�gtmR�oo>s 1 M p rij w a "" Ian N oY'T; i W C3 S171 � r✓,°� NJ 1�J f�1 I31Y ^'pl � aRY4P 4t 'tl� ... i..�ml�lw awm wm�� �*�" d� �� O m rem �i m �' Ni iii �it i of _. �iffaa j KT pt " Cl) ' O wSD Lor N(0 Fill' a " C 3 ZI 3 Em0 m mN(� Cc m C 3 O O � • Iwo D y L w w s N 3 3 +� j u; m._ = p w w L� h o op Ln 'IV ii CL r1l) r w m w ra ❑ ❑ p ❑ CL v 3 ¢yro ___ � w a a I -97 � , • Q NIWm O ( o O o I -_ a m� Er N p CIDJV - 3 0 CD ED Ul m (p' w (Y1 Ln CD ru gramm SD Ellmum ]❑❑❑❑❑❑w uw a � ni sono ra un If7Ill I'm ru w B O 3� c)in�• rn �� .. C3 w �NI� I ° CID .� slt4larr.6 P°��Yr::reup $3.3Q.0 �„I�',� , ,2 % m m a w 03 m M d s4 Lf') V• 1(k4 Y"WtG> �"q d7 9 p!! p bfA'l7 A H rl,+� �W'r�lIaP!E a o"7fn w,��6r °. C• i % �Ip�r,htrn l4ry dlkol�rx»�iYa.walpl pr mdr p M m O B. W Q r9 V p8fliuun II9u trepp p Vi pu nu am Vw "�Y7 fll k m m m N m IM 0 l am` a <<' �. C3 j rMuatld Il,uuo Gni pN nqualunP p p llb _ M ,Y l C3 1U i m(n(/7 m 0:0:E) O N ... a (W6 room fD.A a o F 3 .n_ 'Taavn{PeniR"<gro�o and tl apb�F a c- � < C7 ,.._ M1t� 3mn m C3 $6 68 00' _ ❑ m w yup < �» -v o m i ❑ � oo � C3 u W or I? n ..,._,..... Z �. o a rn G'. �d3 gP`PY.��fl P'd N�,Y Hi CID o 0i w+MAlr 3 . �w nmm ��� ma "ill itl1 illii ',wm w...amm wml ..m JI . w. �.. m . cn �� D o D o2 C� uuu m m..., ii uuuw uuu °°I" 3 �1 S O N h O II uuuw IIIV Ln Emmm �. 3 ' 3 m m000iuuuwuuuo e® O C] maw W Z �IIIIIIIIOIIIIITR D 3,� "O C ,�,y _. (D S (D Q' Jp m »: 3 �IIIIIIIIIIUII■I @ —Fp' N — 1 wx wuuuuuuw @ 7 CD Ilw ;, ,,,o,. Q N O O ° N II i f f 1 N ru .., -J ,;..nypppnplllllllllll j a O N udf 1fw Y KIM Nam') � 4 v � � g rLi 3.30d wmn � N 13 L L17 IdVLL deY w7js r+ ¢B(u f Fi Ya Ys w.a I PiIA rru iJ r CD Iu fe i CJI C 3 O ' { AVN wV Iu'uu ddrvr u*II""��awuuY aproldY .. 6 IICda ,� IP,,,WU N � El O ov mm VNIm"Od QvaY¢ma~ru ruoh .� .� —J � rn P"d� .. N w �ry f A �' nx B w _ .Ifw� Z c"U m00000l000011, 0 n V ar9I'�Wou d MoU O gean4W UO 0-11vawr "' O. E` v 0 � �b X1011111111111111 M 0 O AOIVY,W, IplarmquurawVNmxuluultl b ���� �o`r� W _ � p GAu�dauft Ilia"IdIdUM V'B Orcwd Uwv Irvoillq; ._ „-. mv` Oi nu^' "" ', O �"'" _ ,. O K CD 4 mrtfrv�ay u °�� m _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII O �'"" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIW �'"°' . mpN .. _ ., ., o —' „p v m 0vd uwrud an m m Ip �p 00000000ln 0 C3 a u, m $ w i� r w 64 Ln O ❑1113 El 11wW a ru r-q I r Adm A,r. d _p R URD _ w I�'Muil�u'll m o o �m� mm . _ m Sol CD (D (D <c� <' CD ccU 7 , �- N tyL m o Q. ■ ■ ■ = c � OD � � n Q o `<° o � • ° O ■IIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIIN 7 n s 3 U C3 o1m>vuuu!T! '+ Nt G ® Cr 3 Z _ CD . fD 3 r2 C " O ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ 3 c ° _ . uuuw o n �v_,u,KmSm�� f o �m m� � �C� „bOAIOIINWI k.Ic Cl uDI CL " Ooo�C" wwu m' ° CD ^qj 3U, owuovuimol N 0 CD W _'oEr gi�1 —• � 0000000loolo 4 3, a �y Q 6. UI 'F40001111111111111m1 S O nm wm C � J Q O O V wu n ). fD VIII VIII uuu C w ,d. C°'" I m 3 ° Lj .., °' uuu IIII A m ml nolo m fD M9 m cal U7 _ CD ml co 01 N m W I� I Cp f o"❑.� �c A � ti q CUluTo0&+mu,uro6Ol ul ❑❑❑❑w rU �.� �A4� � ru 1Oo� ' 0 uI' Lr)Pr U1 > >> 2Vrd was vd�r� OW K ., 0 0 w 2. p 6 II tlrwd s D m JJ Ak, ern O II aC IPP'G0INNJ aYO N'IYb�aUO'�"?4gI� 14NIVVYwlf ,� ;'I,�nm RAlx wr P�Q9�QR i p C] �davVwl% IluorvVuumretldgv VrnpuaaaB ..... L,.... r 2z � C3 8 � A Imid,vVllOuo ntllurrm V'N�uawWvlmMIMd OVI!aYVmmny� CD o f ai frrl��� �V 7W CD °d ��' w a� � m OL .47 y " r .. O 3 Ln �I 3 =rB rS O bGdn dal vtY ��Nr a Jna D Z3 C C Ol 0 2 0�� ❑ p,m ilk. nv.u° �IIY"�i ole n iU: � IIIA I: I ❑ ❑ (D ❑ 3 UID CD 0 fi, 4 100 CS) s uuuwmmumi ted's O .�+ 3 ;e C mIIIIIIW A� S M �ml CID z r 10 wwwmm (D S 3 CID mcm �� iva o 0 o w m muw uii dMP uuuu umu V„•a www_.___. �� z d 7 ((D (A SII SII OD C3 0 Et� C uiuuu M. n m p W m m No O ,CD w w uu u w -�. ..... fl. miml � r 3 r ���������° n or m o a Ln 3 �Xr, n m ..m '. �.. . ... �, m, � u"u __.. ". w v, w (d ip8uirlehutaaruXmuuurmfr°l ru�euXuni�lrm�IIH1°b r Z O � `am0 09 1 -4= F " o psG E' 03 NLf $ O O rl NEr N D V riivau a muuuu®wuou a�asuV:u uuw ud � ��, pb�u' r°u o � =!!1.1 9. `ID CID . I °aS • SID CD O� " 0 "C3 ��AduXObmw7on 8�b0dora AmIVHmuy , y . W L—APrgtrvredd � Y � C3 $0.47 Ln To TApr /1 / a r .moo ❑❑❑❑❑w,u O � �u C)n n D fd1 ��� � v 00 _ _ ni p . .. En cn lo ky'ED, " �., m C�� ,a ' �w w r` u.b �� ,r� tl bra .. . P... . .. ... ............ m `m ®�3 ��` Cu, urs a5 m 1 Cq a, ap � I o, m o �. CID 2 o 1d —~ CD r �' 'w.w• (73 Ruu w o D a' n 3 ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ o m 0 5 uvuvuWuuu o �. o m an CO K v o�M- 3 ...._ .. _ u IIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIM � D L-3 MERM Sr w� o ® n 3E: mm v �mmmlm r°: m_3 f m c'm m a m B ❑ m �1 ❑ L-j 3 ,. 1nIIN " �,m N c Z o o m LD. 3 3— z { D 1 Ln _ r O O w (D 7 M » m.w•� O (D h a:r0 'O O 3 IIII ¢i CL j (D CO3 ,z .301.w ° ;N v ,... M V b ,wmn, "^" to p" .(D..w LDo o ® N _. 0' o a c O 'o N IM L° wmm� O .— o � � 'o, aw 1 o � ya L U umoi z C33 77 co u01 %ooiiiia d W III �Omllllllllllllly" I. .. ..uuppiiiiiiiuuuuuu v IIIIIVu iuum I!° ""^.................—�� '" N O (SIr C-3 D ® ll GMm uuur ��������� ��������� mm N C Y�" mmwnn _. . cr p ru u muuuuvovuuwm P�mm' ml=uuui w�nm A m m.... 0 _ .uuum G r""° w mmmimuu (�/ p w_ CD I Im ool to W ... .. N (D ru m Imm m ., R �i �ju f ru � .. - C3 � u Pd�sKirtir,��an��lo e lay. �..... �_ ......��w.w�____w_..... — �... . ru $3.3101 0971 11:10 El ...mm fl II iaunusu un II VwrTcm.l 'So m (n(n z app ��" a rqV¢awPavla, Y,,a wuuyi�a,ra+r rt sr r` t r II su w �waaV rr a o� ++m � uuv 11 aarrad T arl ew$•hlo"11l fi ,k Pod lna d( ID m m O I q Oi�+irulluru�a uAsH u� ,inane d Dollmmy B a V 11 CD CL , �* „� O d4vduiVtVVdrrmmpauurm VE�rudartalrval0waslipr ,,,, "D„I "I"d �u CD m ®� Dl (7 y " mm m a � a aG � 4 � o ro 7D n ` B _ � 201 6 o w CL mceaaH�" aaaa�Xraawrd(bX � M � m ID m ^„� ® mdrrR P d� ��� " dl. . D (D v1dX , .0 � � rx °�• � m O m CD a + "aCD . ° a m Pg� 9✓Awr �J 'u"u uAu� s,m m •„ aro m u lul u. rOr Vu rV IV m ... CD CL uX u� wg. w ❑ "" '" z m Lb a iddt.. k,.G.I a rl4 (D " _ ,x, m R D N (� -j D >., O =' OJIM Ln • __ - c? n P 6 iuwuu """` rXu N K wu�umluwu .. Ln .�.�._ uuw wmn p� &1'w� uuw uum m muu 1 co (D aII..: a m (ii) 0^ '"w mi mi m mw Er -1 �� C 7 1VV II III zi �I Twpp ��,.��pp ppipp�g gg��� aq y rod, rq Ill� .�.CAw ,u pp� 0971 �y '... ._._ ...n... JIM m C Fs¢'I,'ukrasr b�dW III @ C1�i W.� _., ... 4,"8+ -0C3 I "..w • w O CL..y Z Ln A. w.ws V p vu � bE6h P row , d 6 d 7�?tl,�ktxa,rnae Y Parna rr a o Al:µv! ,r � www i Ui ' r ° a� " .,,.>IJ o v (D r-� ,yup Qas4iba^ttumenYnr� m, u �u I r V°GalllN'C"EdNv r O ..�..-: O .+ O E]Cdwu 111"i V0v sill MWmuicled M:Pambe �" OIISmII"dd�� '- N ru , C 3 O (D • + O 0 P Vij&SIgpinwii,wuiI Fll�oquim�M n^iw fru nN _V' Er w. Ad uilt Si gi uiftuae M eSM OW I111divnsuy ., _._._..�.. ��ryww�= m $0.4 ...0 (;u'E;I�b��q 4bCVtS'04Ndll'rvghXtl�� � ,'�. � ,.�,�..�.....�,—.........._ sww,.,� ��� � � � � �� � ,,... n 10 El 11110 P Ln �b�odaPYr k' C3 IVII�i CID ID :. Cl �. � N ", m CP ,M _ _ o o �o . Q • o u�i D� a I 7 0 3? v -= p1*o m 3 m C 0 3 m? M m ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ 00 Er3' w a o O wm o �.»»�3 m �+w 7 3 3 �c c QM W13 r M I� ' wwuwuuuuum s 1 a CD m m EL CL'33 »» pC3 S w m a O D 00 P , U1 woo= Ln 0 0 3uj a Fw w S Z `" 2 L,3 cb o a o = ? LSM � � o � r_ o ff C._ 3 0m • �,: . g 11 N L J j O" < mwt iuw mem o 'D ..17 m 4 ( � O mw uuuu �uu W ip iuvumsh•hmnu � (p muuu um co �,CA ,....,.a .. �, „. r'1 ii lhi m u r ... Er C] � 30 Ili Y ......:,.�. ,. ....._.. +. _ e e m A rdleikW+N gtlld F w rh uy �o 9M """ SII qll pmvttwuun VMiMraalpsP�'n�uv 4 r,a R$3.3�i�r rare PWn uir:x. i�u�+�r�.+r�.. 'r > > < p u sbvY HA r b� �� 3 3 m C� � 9 agrb n " m �oSquuYfl,I uMagvuuu�re V'8uad uaNrvreae& rI I glRouo.Mnm Rocaalpt(Wwlt ift) i , 9 C3 Lj �adifiaad9 lWIIII Fle*Mudr4,md,M IDodOsuo $ bGM w u ..... 8 A uN'�ll f s a � I�au"dusPu aV....uuumw ll8a"rptlV........Wu......p.. c3 i Z i ` o gnrb,,Mkr�eM $0.47 . OD zu. •. b ,m e ... 09/1,' °1h 016 e w „p 4ohVare� uuag huaww V a wnr . p 47 O t_'f Ie' C1, Ln e ,z s "' ., 'hl�s rhrhrJa wCe tM"hu1(n in I [111 da .Cw 9 11 ie p ''. �. P�df SIIPr�g(rw g� �tl. • �b h Cn -n O Ln �62:11 �um�mimouuuim ■ �faDrn � C7 P— w m 3 ' �" iu�nmoioouuvluH — O v O Er ggp� A �� ,N +� uu m u a, .ft.� N O b .....a mouuuuwu �� o 11 pP$3 30 -- �9N o G tom" .. _�o m w t f o �, � goo rowPu MQ.rw and Yi 4k fl'C a tYl t.Qt�ras M;x d'Ya {YBH➢ J„ ` �" W 0 Q N U ue vQm i�r o a Ba JnVS cD CID +�' M �.II �� 4� Ln a w 0�Peho is VOaiw0!0 n Q uaWauvV ..�� .. ��� ,,,,�Pa�a9k':.�M ) � u � i' � �Q v 0A ouua Wad wIIIM u;; z rj n Q C3 �$ A m uv ' g wmm000i0000u n y ca C3 4�a�dnnlir,ip'uunaaP ini«ro llda,�uullu rwaq m' &&, F 1 w �V4n u. ' P•alQyuniall idoau pXu!u trfrl tltlluroOliMru+i c `O w C:3 ( o ru cl _ o N ._ wwwu �+ was c3 _ _ V"aan'a 'raw 9a� uro MQ4rx� u�aro rl 9 '' ov C3 uu umi000m C3 0Q �� r W -. u�wuuuwmmmw a < Ln cro FD w p (D i P a.� �'J KK�� «. ,mM ❑�.`�4�„�(,J M•++wre..wmmw.�wgwmrn...rw�wnwn W Y ALNO O==4D w( cm w a m m c ttpp �p�pN 1 db d p ,•..,,•�w i V w m eA> >> Nil 7 �� (n w 33 a 7o COD �m akk �� � v 4 CL a Q <' n 7 CID3 N a N N '(D 0 oEl • 3 Li Coy) M -Uq Dov��� m ID _ a �roro mm�� �, o m o m'm' ��<'-. .O F3 m ��m »gym m� v 3 >> mD' $�� ❑ ' ' M) CID zo m ^ K ° y s o a, v m -5' >> > m n < aCD 7 ti' �Uui w"d W M. Iib mmu uuw rq pm ru _ i �� // i ru r � „w ' r,aumhdPhQaup 9W��zWu Fen ...•,........ 1 Ln NI'd�;... PwrdA,ug,g:.."Ve%rtf Ctiru to Y✓i aur+�d Jy si.n �lQa ��{u�p "'�C a Q11 PlmalauuuT IR'Af roOpz olo~wanUa,Mµr}a� IRatuuunro lfQocriµra(oa w.nup�rc Ic) C3 �a ,u�rnsa��uuQawwwa�d�,Qu:Qwuhug; ��py� ' "wyraGuQr�Qux E=l �I lAdI it [garuu4wivaUEiwou4rat' C3 ,FQdllu vIais Q¢aflflcsDubwig ... -_ C3 P, ri °w .� 'dk�ivaIwq-''n:IPp %pil'bF �'a ,. .......„ ..,... C56.47 LJ) somley C3 °nldd, t�rr d$fag a':r ao 1{IMa mew w I uuw VI �, �b �ro mums mnm uma III�. muuu uuuu ICU Qru i ru 0 Ln2�.'mfarS��U,bUuAs r7�mflu��u�i Jiw r.ui ars�il��'a�'W�v ra r u("xmvrk... � 1 HINIM,ll'"d�,ellpu yImrJ:"aaarWVD .��NIVIVJIIuoRviceipy yuwlmma,uVmiiroNr'l„ ", '� I�"4Ak�Ull'YI.U"�G Q umJCallII wr'u Ubiiiih llU uedn"r�m 'tl:�Wghvsfr !),� � oda Q I„I�A^duultl„';9y',�ir�.ui ura Vdarr„gcuUxu�V � '�' � � •, C3 I'UunaaUouom Ytlro„crirdmu:�rN�vaVllvrnr,� %; C3 NA, �- $ 111]1.47 4'f,. �� 'IrwGPl�i .... ��U� a�dmuNa�' p 194 0 p1 ®r, ill le �" wl�r cD � ry a� ■ ■ ■" $ N uliiiiiiiiiiiiiolilloiii n j O ,O. b Room _L Q = N O N o O :.i. ® 91 D a IL.--° IIIIIIIIIIII� w t�np p O V 3. o a ay a —_moi,a = N U) Q * p C p Li �uw S j a N 'e Cn ; .... N N _- D. Pl (.11 'II rnmlllll00000 N a 7a co ;: U°u x O@ W 01) -4 m "MI1110111119 a. Wrt O p Er ...................... N Rl ui..... (D O O WF l umuu umu N p uum uu Jm � � u•mniiiiiumim (D� CID x, � � L'Po umu muuu imw N co yrs O D W D vld��ul UmOo spy, m ❑OOOO��. „„�.. Q 0 22 t c vru Ca wy. UUm " ® � RI �a�/3 J J R�a ..2 rn In ..;iClfl uW Ra4n1E Y rw �_ J $3.3 O O d,®°.l..1 j D. ,...,. ,' ..� . S"rikpia m Yvira W a Iir� ew,awrfrl�cau ie adr wAuMq rr"m ro 3$ ITN ' a Il�ur�itu ra lltm�„ p d�. i 0 D m Ifrt OoaiwWwOpj,V 0 o mi m' fU m CD fA= N r W N C C N N C Z � IIN Ruwuur ll�u�^wnlly»u P«mlaw mr�nx�Jnry as �^ N�,m �� I � ,a�,�"N9aakuuk�B� .�� o E]Adu h I�duil uw d tl II n 'aY �� { � nua Q �NdivuUd,�^qirwm0.vunsa 116ad gruluwwd $ m <' '� w Q ]la dirlY w4Uggi rua�uuura lltlnaUml rtu*ak USr+lllwmsw^„+ ' Z o CID2 1 Z Q II ra a is aW c� N a • m m ' am $0.47GN /1 7 � .2 � �' e,�"""”" • w, � IU�w� p UI iw�ul,apas'rumr�Il�a'riri� 3 1:1 El ci N.� �r. o7 (p �p mm ... �^,, N„, .rv.... Po m fG N N Ln T_tG O O N "9w„.. w S +,�"'0.wM✓ c c �. Q t.��ru rcur "J',� aaa,w,d+�'a. .,�°° m. .,... .. ��� m°.!� vm� �'" � Lew, 3 cpm .zmm _ K ❑ �. .. ....w... O �' 7U s� O Od 37 m "ruakr dJgd,Ntl IU N ZD,.. ��, p p _ CRD, Q � � � N m i i um r 111 If > > (D C V- Michaelis, Jessica From: Cummings, Brian A. Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:32 PMF� To: Michaelis, Jessica 4u Subject: FW: Ackerman 102-4-6.1 �� i � 1 Kllvling 10,�d�, From: Fisher, Robert Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:15 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Subject: Ackerman 102-4-6.1 Brian I have no further concerns about this project. Bob Robert Fisher Fire Marshall, Town of Southold robert.fisher@town.southold.ny.us (W) 631-765-1802 - (C) 631-786-9180 PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICA TION CONFIDENTIALITYNOTICE' This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. 1 Submission Without a Cover Letter #,(-H KT ro 5T C� Sender: �s' � SEP 22 2Hi 11�1" old Town RanrOg Board Subject: SCTM#: 1000 - 1 °" `T —`e \, Date: ` . M Comments: JkIA5 0, 6adV f � Michaelis, Jessica From: Cummings, Brian A. p Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:53 AM To: Michaelis, Jessica Subject: FW: Site Plans `• 1" 2, 0 2O1(3 laa rro g Board From: Doherty,Peter Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 4:03 PM To: Cummings, Brian A. Cc: Silleck, Mary; Duffy, Bill; Hagan, Damon Subject: Site Plans Brian As of 9/19/16 1 have no violations at the following properties. 1000-102.-4-6.1 Ackerman Agricultural Barn 1000-12.-1-1.2 Fox Lane Residences Pete Doherty � x�arx LOCATION:OFFICE r MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex $ ` ,� : P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtow-rmy.gov I 11A PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: September 19, 2016 Re: Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation.. Ends: Site Plan Application Site Plan Laserfiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 OFFICE LOCATION: a `" ,/,. HEALING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 e :p, Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov w. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Peter Doherty, Code Enforcement Officer Robert Fisher, Fire Marshall From: Brian Cummings, Planner �& Date: September 19, 2016 Rem Proposed Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and any violations on record, if applicable. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. (in Laser Fiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#9000-902-4- 6.9) OFFICE LOCATION: ) , w, MAILING ADDRESS: � `, Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179� `.�w 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) "'; Telephone: 631765-1938 Southold, NY 4� www.southoldtownny.gov �,1-1 " '" ,��w � PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2016 Mr. Matthew Martin Cutchogue Fire District 260 New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Request for Review: Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1,280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Martin: The enclosed Site Plan Application is being referred to you for your comments on matters of interest to the fire department, including fire department equipment access, emergency services, and any other issue that may be of concern or relevance to this application. Please respond with your recommendations at your earliest convenience. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Please contact me at (631)765-1938 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian Cummings Planner Encls.: Site Plan Application Site Plan ° MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING s � P.O. sox 1179 Southold, NY 11971 DONALD J.WILCENSKI tir Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 J ES .RICH III (cor. Main Rd. Youngs Ave.) RTIN H.SIDORh � �, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtow-nny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Engineering Inspector From: Brian Cummings, Planner (� l„ Date: September 19, 2016 Re: Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn Application Name: Ackermann Agricultural Barn Tax Map Number: 1000-102-4-6.1 Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map Preliminary Subdivision Map Final Subdivision Map Road Profiles Grading and Drainage Plans Other �1 Site Plan (Dated: 7/12/16) Revised/Amended Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plans Other (AS BUILT) Project Descri tion: This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. OFFICE LOCATION: ZZIV w MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex 1� �� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Av)9.) a Southold, NY � Telephone: 631 765-1938 VIP www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk cc: Town Attorney From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: September 19, 2016 Re Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and a determination of jurisdiction, if applicable. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. (in Laser Fiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-102-4- 6.1) OFFICE TI : xx tv l� MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex � �� P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Cou PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: September 19, 2016 Re: Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. (In Laser Fiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-102-4- 6.1) OFFICE LOCATION: rx. r MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ) � � ', P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 ° ' Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator From: Brian Cummings, Planner lj- Date: September 19, 2016 Re: Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you for your cooperation. (in Laser Fiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-102-4- 6.1) OFFICE LOCATION: %zzzzVZ,��,,- MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annexe ` � ' � P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 { Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) ° Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov oUNT`I PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Suffolk County Planning Commission From: Brian Cummings, Planne Date: September 19, 2016 RE: Site Plan Application Review— • Request for Comments pursuant to General Municipal Law §239 (as a referral) and Southold Town Code §280-131 The purpose of this request is to seek comments from your agency. Please provide the following, as applicable: 1. Comments or requirements the Planning Board should take into consideration while reviewing the proposed project; 2. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated; 3. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; and Following is information pertaining to the project under review. For further information, please feel free to contact this office. Project Name: Ackermann Agricultural Barn Address: 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue Tax Map #: 1000-102.-4-6.1 Requested Action: This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X) Type II ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Brian Cummings, Planner (631)765-1938 Enclosures: • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application Form • Site Plan(s) OFFICE LOCATION: ,� `.r MAILING ADDRESS: To Hall Annex so P.O.P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 r Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, Y Telephone: 631 766-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov UN PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD emorandurn To: Elizabeth Thompson, Chairperson Southold Town Architectural Review Committee From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: September 19, 2016 Re: Request for Review: Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvah's Lane, ±1280' n/o Alvah's La. & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 The Planning Board refers this Site Plan Application to your committee for review and comments. This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Thank you. Encls.: Site Plan Application and Site Plan Elevations Laserfiche: Planning, Applications, Site Plans, Pending, SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 f;r ""r r ADDRESS: I ` �' ' solo-, P.O. sox 1179 PLANNSouthold DONALD J.WILCENSKI " � 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III ' � (cor. Main d. Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR "^ " �� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 15, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1,175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Dear Mr. Ackermann: I am writing as a follow-up to the Work Session held on September 12, 2016 where the Planning Board formally accepted the above-referenced Amended Site Plan for review and determined that the proposed is a Type II Action under SEQR pursuant to §617.5(c)(3). The Planning Board, its Staff, Town departments and relevant agencies will provide additional comments following full review. If you have any questions regarding this Site Plan or its process, please do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, ek- Brian A. Cummings Planner #12965 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) p Karen Kine of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successfully commencing on the 22nd day of September, 2016. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me thisday ofw. �r 201 6 .. mm �. . .w lultivo o(Vo�l"Ale 11>o0yluig VOLINSKI l fl" I(','; JS Iff fUED 01VEN NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK I�umf„ awralantIo atkl ` Y rwfflue No. 01V06105050 ("�o lc Oftha. T"rwwncofi Swrwuufufwfd,au fltub-; 00 hearing w111 Ile,hold by flue wsovth�_ Qu allfhd In Suffolk County oidlbwn ftuuuaafau6 f)rwuard,ail tftc lawn ply CfiMMI56109 110110h Febwevv 28,2020 T kll,lw�wfxu ltwwuurl o uihavlaf,New ifk on t`Ituw, urtf ffua of October,,2016 oo Vlaa a ft0 f l rut.aJ tfu followrtwrn , 60"'l,1".44, I'rollwwwwwN ufw Phal for filo fQr 1�t,�! a kuru t,r°Y located aid 1666(yi PWY ,I ffrtw „ tf0'uafww+fwa S4wuuau� f up'sws f fw off5, cutwalH4afow' Town,of , ; wuuthuv r ' uaunuy;of Suffolk,840ulaaf ffin Yftu^Il ffuuffotk County 'rax ]Wip: Iu; v'tx4`fiulfatl�w97w;-11 0i,r) jfxrn. f"rr:r)om,,wlrr,rarulw od' f1v 1�11rwn Aw the Ackermann Ag6cultuvall Hart loca wd of W0 0 Alwfli a L,t'upuN *1wl.75''n1w1nflyS110.25a!fa, lwuultwUawl, *aut h000c' °1a,lawn of Soulfuo4l, t7046ty; f Suffolk, State ark New Yr rk, wluulf6lk '„uuuunt;y'16'au Nlop a tawVw r 1 dtl-ff w�f•d 1a. Dattewf, �7f Bf dr' t f 4 f'i 1101. "1'010 ' f'EAPNNING f1OA-1f,,1) 1,louuuutal$,Wila~w;mki MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS q / P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ' d Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �° * (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR � N "" � Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtow-nny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 3rd day of October, 2016 on the question of the following: 6:01 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the E. Lopez Nursery located at 36660 NYS Route 25, 270' s/w/o Skunk Lane & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-97-3-3.1 6:02 p.m. Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1,175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 102-4-6.1 Dated: 9/15/16 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Kalin, Carol From: legals <legals@timesreview.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 2:06 PM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: Re: Legal Ad for September 22nd Suffolk Times Good afternoon, The legal notice has been scheduled to be published in the 9/22 edition of the Suffolk Times. Thank you and have a great day! Best regards, L e) F:e�v MMIA GROUP Lindsay Riemer Assistant Sales Coordinator 631„29803200 ext. 23.5 63103.54.QI_ (dilrect)mm 631.2.99.0410(fax) ldern.9L@Dt=esre0ew.com www,timesreview.com From: "Kalin, Carol” <Carol.Kalin @town.southold.ny.us> Date:Thursday, September 15, 2016 2:00 PM To: Lindsay Riemer<legals@timesreview.com> Subject: Legal Ad for September 22nd Suffolk Times Please print the attached legal ad for the October 3, 2016 Planning Board Public Hearings regarding the Site Plan for the E. Lopez Nursery and the Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn in the September 22, 2016 edition of the Suffolk Times. An e-mail confirmation of receipt for our files will be appreciated. Thanks. Carol Kalin Secretarial Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex at Capital One Bank 54375 NYS Route 25, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 631/765-1938 phone 631/765-6640 fax t MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r S004, �.�' P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 SS JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDORCoy �W� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outholdtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 3rd day of October, 2016 on the question of the following: 6:01 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for the E. Lopez Nursery located at 36660 NYS Route 25, 270' s/w/o Skunk Lane & NYS Rt. 25, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-97-3-3.1 6:02 p.m. Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1,175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 &Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 102-4-6.1 Dated: 9/15/16 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Jessica Michaelis, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 16th day of September, 2016, she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold Town Hall 63096 Main Road Southold New York October 3, 2016 Public Meeting: 6:01 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for E. Lopez Nursery, SCTM#1000-97-3-3.1 6:02 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Amended Site Plan for Ackermann Agricultural Barn, SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Jessica Michaelis Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this 6'4 day of&44� 2016. .. - Notary Public CONNIE D. BUNCH Notary Public,State of New York No.01 BU6185050 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14,2-0�jo AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD When to use this form: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring this form must be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission in accordance with Sections 239-m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law. Applicant Name: William Ackermann/NFVS Holdings, LLC Address: P.O. Box 633, Laurel, NY 11948 Land Owner (if other than applicant): Land Owner Address: Description of Proposed Project: This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Property Location (road and tax map #): 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Is this parcel actively farmed? Yes No Names & addresses of any landowners within the agricultural district containing active farm operations located 500 feet of the boundary of the proposed project: SCTM#1000-102.-4-6.2 (now 7.3): Howard Simon, 27 Stacey Lane, Madison, CT 06442 Attach a tax map or other map showing the site of the property where the project is proposed relative to the location of farm operations identified above. 9 76 Applicant/Agent Signature D to rMAILING ADDRESS: MEMBERSPLANNING BOARD pF S0114 P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI � +,,� Southold, NY 11971 �S �'" � Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY ° � 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III . (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR x ,00UNTY � fit' Southold, NY n Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtowuny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 13, 2016 Mr. William Ackermann P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: SEAR Classification & Set Hearing - Proposed Amended Site Plan for the Ackermann Agricultural Barn Located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Route 25 &Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-1000-102-4-6.1 Zoning District: AC Dear Mr. Ackermann: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 12, 2016: WHEREAS, this Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c), determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(3) agricultural farm management practices, including construction, maintenance and repair of farm buildings and structures, and land use changes consistent with generally accepted principles of farming. The action is for the construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. building for agricultural equipment storage; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is a Type II Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, October 3, 2016 at 6:02 p.m. for a Public Hearing regarding the Site Plan entitled Ackermann Property, prepared by Jeffrey T. Butler , P.E., dated July 12, 2016. Page 2 September 13 Ackermann, .._.....__....�2016 The public hearing packet regarding the Town's notification procedure and the sign & post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office at the Southold Town Annex when you are contacted to do so. Please return the Affidavit of Posting/Mailing, included in the packet, along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, September 30 2016. The si n and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing is closed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, &W-" H 4.114 ?--� James H. Rich III Vice-Chairman Encls. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for an Amended Site Plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the Agricultural-Conservation Zoning District; 4. That this Amended Site Plan Application is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres. The property is located at 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. in the Planning Department located in the Town Hall Annex on the corner of Youngs Avenue & NYS Route 25, Southold (2nd FI., Capital One Bank). If you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938. Information can also be obtained via the internet following these steps: a) Go to the Town of Southold website www.southoldtownny.gov; b) Click on Weblink located on bottom left of home page; c) Click on "Planning Dept." folder; d) Click on "Applications", then "Site Plans", then "Pending"; e) Click on the SCTM# (tax map #) of the application (found in #2 above). Or by sending an e-mail message to: jessicam(a�southoldtownny.gov; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, October 3, 2016 at 6:02 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in The Suffolk Times published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: NFVS Holdings, LLC/Ackermann Agricultural Barn Date: 9/13/16 Notice to Adjacent Property Owners Ackermann Ag Barn SCTM# 102.-4-6.1 1350 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 1. 102.-4-5.5 2. 102.-4-8.1 3. 102.4-9.1 4. 102.-4-7.2 5. 102.4-5.3 (D RT) 6. 102.-7-1 (TOSRB) 7. 102.-7-2 8. 102.-7-3 9. 102.-7-4 10. 102.-7-5 (PSP) 11. 102.-8-35 (PUTO) 12. 102.-8-36 (TOSRB) 13. 109.-1-24.2 14. 109.-1-24.3 15. 109.2-18 16. 109.-2-2.1 17. 109.-2.2.2 18. 109.-2-12.5 19. 109.-2-12.4 DRT-Southold Town Development Rights TOSRB -Town of Southold Recharge Basin PSP-Private Subdivision Park PUTO-Public Town Open Space (passive use) — ----- -- ._... ....... .._ _,... fM 17 XqL K('� � �'"w •. CI Y7 AN b�'+`•w,.w rvr ""w, LINE MATCH _. LINE '"..,,„.w ,. MATCht.. .....:........ SEE 5EC.N0.096 ._.......,_,.._..... ....a+"^»„. + ""r SEE SEC NO.a`.4a ,/" .,..._L1 htlF: "`"w, a M.Yt A.PR1 w, ""~,.. MAEC,B I. )+' ,� 'o`,r� *.a SEE SCC NO _. __.., +r. �`".., J P Mf484{GIME kA W N P@7 _ ,rPCL NO TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 07 toot , % y NPVPY tgerctarr+rr I,4 rJ-rJgr04 ° w. .„,. ,,.,,'r” ala a9s-as-atz.z ,, . 237 1Pb 30 01 rv'h 97.QA '^� ''h TOWN OF SOUTHOLD rr:, s" ^^•..^"x"., x,., 6.aA(a) `\ 230 a1 471 OJ d N d IOPEry sPACEY d Pr u I AIN w,,,,, ti 6 2A(c) G 11x4 r y . 1AvI F,�. '@ ,,�w. ✓,, rtrvA""-.0.M 2..7 F`" 4'✓ dy ,. s.'�, ;,✓ 'x 1fi.1A(cy ''1pw". 23.3 `°? i0lR X14 00 Xy ^ GUTCNOGUE w..nwd ITOWNOF 50UTHOLO N111, ENPR(GIfTS) fid' "�•`�17&h441 0@0^0 N' "p' ,1 GW w Yto ey„ ,. �"^• 4, CEMETERY" ASSOCIATION1+13 fl1q �,�"` 4Y 1 2 J 00 S 2zsa w `s, w USm'a.Tl'Nn 2 N�r ,, 4,. A"tai� � M w ,, '� „W^V . , (TOWNOFSOUrHOLD dt F * Gfi .. r p „"""..I) OEVELOPAEENI RIGHTS) 11-24-061ro.>rv.° fi `"' '" '42 4 Ofi � li""Oa'rA s T ti+gr �' �* vp "tl. ah �P,P ua j PF .ry,, urs +. / "4k• �*ti "G / a )" XY -0 •�� pp M. . �gpl041�I � � �;^ 'r".1 "C. IT V, to �vY , 41 ., ��`"Y,a- � 16.2 1b, '2'~^^¢ r Ya my T 9 FOR PCL NO 92 �.•••• V p SEE SEC.NO. T``w �rr ,;,''^,, 25.0A "«. la 101-02-021.3 �" rv`'v," O .N n ^'�" )' r N day S X ^r.. 45.fiA(c} 5 BA 3.9A(c) 33.3 ,o �°' ✓r x w w 1 ,1 *a T .. ....., a,;y "",a r.• TON ''^�. 'r♦s" „,. P;". ,`«^J'a. ""w• 23.1 . � er z�oA 6.0A(e) P a CVTG10011E SCHOOL ui5 asralcr 23.2 Nav�X�Pndur'rrNeGerrw�J � Cy""" a �, ,� �:. �""-•.,t � p` �+ ""�. 6 A aa` 9;z _ � 1m (GOUNTYOFSUFFOIX 5-4m W' V Wy OEVELOPMENTflIGfTlS) VA 94 9,JdM1 'V ....,.. FOR PCL NO ` w tm Nr P I*" *1 .� SEE SEC.NO. 7.3 �"F4D W d r h h aF" wty �'' 33.wtlN oA' }"W 202 ...-... .,.. � 109-02-024.6 C :"HX S,IA � "'"+.. � � A'a *sr r �,« � <'" ti."9A(C) � '� ""� � ��;� d1�4+�� �^��� 32.2A(c) �� IU d w .•••, _...m Y' x f".«^. e' "pJ, '� n�.i +J y m ,,.. ",rvl q z ""td" 4'' u 1 7A(d u '' ,�,. * •� ,/ o 'M NEW YORK .� &�;w'w.,' / 45r a 5 x,, / ✓" »1n 2,9A o 7...A '4r ` " „ .• y Gurcalocue FIRE olsmlcr I. 0 _ W 011 .... p "ir �7.d h 'N,w. d.:A s1 h� sv+.�r`'�' VIA y xp, "”" r ` f z .., M' ,, Y m` 7. .w"" 10 2A(cp Pxa"V pr Y O // .,... X ',Ja •fir o x� ,S1n Y N �. n — ,I'jr," �.�,�"' d1MAlAAN0.Y.M1Y9W..MLWq CV,UtlL 4Fd N 01 24 ww ... w �J ra n rr� '" p Clr ahrE.. .4'°x 1r, N BX.O wurrA0d1 FOR PCL NO "h ° v s� m � � ,„ �� „>�""h '`r a� r ���7J ^� .�..,,...... O FOR PCL NO. ..e 5 1 EE SEC. SEE SEC..4 "t, 412 9"? .. N 109-of-0z4.a ,' ", •a ,✓"" 109-01-013.2 1..SA(.) t Nx1v nk n MATCH UNE MATCH LINE ''tiff° Lx"r S SEE SEC.NO.109 2;11y aM _ w ....... .. .. „v�., .. ,��.., ,.. ,. rowN of E TION NO s�,. ,aom .a waaa,�" ,_..........,_.W.,�. smanom.ac:" ,,...re ,�............. Pr_....,_. u,mrssex.�a+o aEanes NOTICE �`N."T�NnBj'1rb K ~w„,r•. .....__. u'.. SOUTHOLD L ppm .. ----�. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © .. .�•--.. (z t) a m aww me saiauu®wsP ._m...... _ @ sc Y:Yrb MNHTEWw6E ALYERRIION SLLE OR � l ��, ., sa w. ,” 5td,' 8(PFOPEf�/Tax S2fVICe Agency V r ,ir4 y wuAGE crF ._._ m nraNarcl r<• r rwXX ds°m-X ru, E a County c..w RI rhm:ad,N Y 11501 1 '®wre.�r'wi.. z®me moan"� w %bm oast.w ....t. ..,.. m„n cowl—na i+..�a Mow.,,,,, M .^_ nk + q .... ., __..—.�...�,.,...,... anwm ..— ., ,.� w. u, ........,.^. .,..4 6d.Y';41 i'.kY PM✓,A^. i . ,.,,. -.. .. - .... xm.md. w .... he...,w.b. M «a�: ,. ✓m, ,. .,... ....�.... a , � a^.,.maomw,aWea dwaex Mxu"e»;ti�mx4. 1�'A'"'SG a�fv.1WMLM . '' �' .. P1W�.��+,W'�MI!,i�+nM�br kA�m,��� Ym+4Pd Wr+r �woama,@arwma��:.T.kwiaN mm��+,N�madu�.w��cw,,,�a/�+w t�wrM N.nwxw�wwPa&aaaieaw,xm ds�,«,w�W,r,dm»�,.,w:w Pma�,. wamwmww �pdv�mwT01w5rew,.�,ndv� +w5m w.M d wmrmww5a. �u .".a,. 4k X P ell, r ,W „ Ga,r9ua �x NCgv P� y" a.z,. .,. fY4-dl'&YJ SEE SEC NO,102 01 3N 410 p.INI MA1'l':1°l a l!quE. p2:r 71 4 #,, +? ". ° psi .�, n.°'. .ddr"�•' "i ks "` 04 211 1'10 ,,,_, ,. .,._..._... .ro. z s. , Ile ov ; 1 ii^t" -- --,`"h y r.rv,xp" „«"•+iCy. x,�,. iw „��,"" zi d..4n]ho.tM1la .............. ;; ..... F41r4 W'a`wa...P11`m. d .p I„ ... 1 O N, o amra MATCH y ,.: Ile, ...... qy ICL ''" "i'g"sg N.. � t.mT .., �' �, �:r�' rt '7�.� V4L1 LIm deep vfr "'',t, 1r s1 "... ,(-rr 4z+• �` 1"" rr 1 rveP""",1;"> 7''' � C " 3 rA ,.. ...w•""" t!dA 9z 77 atnm � :MM1A 24A tat t41t1 I `" 34 2A q14 t,d1.t I *+i" aau NNOFrSOUTHOwrsl r % I,✓' 11.5 7 ..k•""^`. m 83..;0 4" " to 'x"°.« N.• p° a ,.,n ,r7,. y� y0'".. 0 .. 4 5,1 %,..,r""" 71f103 Ot "+,w �DL2 )i �d. * ,u'� "4 2'^ 1u d bh e'er 11 sa tlp` IYa .'"/� ,.. y�. °+" � ,..,."" •"�,« ""` ✓w�s as T ,. yaG e� 7r'S 10A Of{.14•q]2 �b � d4 7,= ''s: +"L�m q', ✓+� I ,'i"'"" �,�50 W..P 3 �� O��r',^ 0.2 1 � � �,.+' .�''"�'" i4 ' `�" ' 1rmM •✓ r SpA t 4 w5• " ? s. �N V, 90 C1N31CYd, I "\\ .✓'„ bP 5,r " X+P a 0`t;r 'l"r 4 nam d/a "a9-;Y 'L .✓ynw,�7 E114 26 CYus ''" (,'/ ,4'( '"`n f �Y h� �' e 12.t �c g} "':"$•w..r"." ."^' 14.35 6IM- .)« m 10 104 © 4:N11006 tl.G""P" ",w�,r' <i 40 tl;ro .rod y%4^^y W L2 15 OPI rye „d i]A(m.) 14.3 �p ,w �1 10.3 nI Z ✓ ✓'� rS," 4" ka CI A 7„ \ 1.3A(c) 7 14.36 aT, 1 >Pn II ci 12 27 SLI , I .v,b8r'7 I 42.1A ±,,. *"' .. tl�2A im ,pf++: �" la .�- , J:-��_ 1.OA(c) Yom. 15 „w'""°" .. rn d"11F7. - J ""' 'w;ti: 1N,✓""' �''� '( -,. R gun s d""' 14 34 815 13 13.2 4 t"u „�, r Ot 71470' PECONIC LAND TRUST"INC ^y """ 'S° „y ^'1 y 7 "'� �"^ TEE LA, pm a4 d'-�• 11 M TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '4"r" �M 10.5 Q� rw tY.t 12 10 I S pry, a<7 ^'*ti. 1.7A(c) �'„1"? 4y 274 q. " BcorvSERVAnoN EasEMEn rvTI pw •r',61 5.2A M (TOINNOFSOUTMLD "\ Pa 9493"' 1 a ^ l r y 1l_)�tltm " 341 (,,, 14.33 L�» X124 DEVElOPMENTRIGNTS) e' A' 'S f4 3 rt s.en(D) �:(pu h^ ', 5l 27.1I'ua 14.3213 r wtt a,P � * m 14.s 1431 m, rM1*z4 1 i onlDl , y• ' * 6,° `° i T7.3A(c) 4r `" „�,.,\ ,"0 ;(rt' 3 6.1 r-. 1 P Y 1.0A(C) ,, y,1T'..L9(""{.' "'."r^" Ni t9 14.6 ....»r^'"" 1Ap _.. ..r ry0 ° 1 ^„ 2.40) ^ " 1 (c) '+d+",,.-__ 'W1p+Y (W'I 26 is .". � 2.tA(c at 4 PATH II ">x 62A 1 � 8.3 X 99.BA eY. 14.30 a, r..__'.,�.. 4 iz 2 41 A m 1 0...,„w�� 14.3 2 A, 4 A RIM 16.3 E , \ e ✓ l)tl a rv.w. .rr� _ 1.aA(e)a w,..w.. 14.29 r*� of� s,lttq - " 1 � 4 m,�P 1.3A c � m 74 7 \y 21 "� a¢.rrr swunrla uLhsLMeNI) tel �I l a -M. .....,. 28 2.7 20 7 ® I aX 14,0 '62 \�.... ' 82 12 + 24 29()1, wt .°yiy .1A 4 1.3A ���t' .-.....M°" '` 1.1iA n .,, .. 8 14.28 10.1 p " w 1a.s ,., 41..m�..(. "w ✓ Po 2.9 du ,P. ,„,-'.. 2,20 3 r.. '" 14.27 1, .. 14.47 T Y., 10 XN 2 43 A() wl �A„�-" e" 2.29 Ij 1.20 14A yl nm c 7 e 1.11...-,_...�- ' 94.10 Wk"ad7iX WAY 1.4A p.. 2A2. y / 2.11 M N 2.30 q ,....�" 1.OA Lu a+!;,,-w" W th 'L, -^1«a""��, 1a.2o 5 4.as _ 4 r:r (c) R>n 14.26 & 1.7A(cy w 2.12 1.9A 14,11 ml p tS. "a.,......_.___.'�.. •" z ..,..�.,.... ..�. 2.25 ." ." -..._....�..._ �...,....maro... I tIP 10A e I= 2 14.25 0,7 36.4A(c) "u0', ryt, ,5 213 ✓'"4'dM 1 4A d 1 ,.w'�� ,r 7.2A(c) �, 1, 14.21 "" 14.43 I I Z +',, 1.OA�r" q 2.32 ml ....tYa 14.92 1.OA( E mw o-" -d+,i, I �J w 16A cma a°.._.�....m,..D 31 2.GA(c) I N � [*. 3 m 2.24 T ...9m. arp 1 8 14 24 1 ?7.2 h E1 aN3LbTn1l.P F` 5 mm a w PR ::p 2F«ic) w \ ",f 2..14 '^ 1.5A ,, X., w, �,,,,,.�.,.�,,..,_� I w (XiTiM'N LAP SCMUPYeR:BTL ,r Nr 14.93 w ••�-- '� " I[TI'JtllrYdY RM"6iMtcACh' _ " ,'.. .� 0 14.22 ll TacvxLrXr"srNTeis+^7 a *� ° z. saAc 'r z.ts " wz.33"' " cn� O� '14(23 " 2A1 { ,. „ e ^ra:aXm NTLrEa7rrsa L^ r" °0 2.23 10Ac 1423 fi ct „s✓��•� F. 0,6 1m a• () 239 Fw dN' 24.7A(c) ,„ '' "' ." 3R n4 14.14 „,....'.mom �✓ „,. 72 d 2 t6 2227 1417N WAY a ➢" 5X L4gAl4 N 51A 14.19 S 1.3A "' ntrF r'y t -... .. Sir 7.1r' 2.34 tl "" ,7'• 14.18 2.SA Sd" ,+' "x y. i.rv„„,.✓y� :4 f la fC7. Pd aEA 2.17 eo9 Of WI s�q PAAK AHD N.,"" + 1 Rel 14 15 eue40 r" tLEGRE7`nOHA 12A yy "(CR" i 11 ., \ I . j 221 -.. .,_xa.",r..m \ 20A '.. „„ 6 '"" % L:. R ./ 220�.LP "i' 2.19 , RECREAYION 7 L1A rd) t+4 �a I I 14.10 al EA 44, '�, 40 2.10 ). � 14.37 3.3A nsr .,✓ . ;m 12XA(c) .✓`,: 6,9 'Y 3.8A tIt"enNIC LANO PIWI,t' r C Le>r 23X3(C) `^.-.. ,,y.,.. (1 a " 29.4o M ., NOTE: 109-06.. 4& RANI)1P 'F,,, '^•,. p AN O'VFRU CON01 nON EXIST S BFTWEI:N A ( ,u. 1 { z ..,...,. ,x - I I 2 ..� r.. 2.OA (:� s �. .,..,"..,.° PARCELS 9, 9� ,r FOR SEC NO, l rr=W FOR PCL.NO. SEE SFC.NO eR 1t FOR PO.NO. BJ en 37 '�ua 1.1A "2� ,:" . SEE SEC..NO. eet " FOR B'CC..NO. - r 1.1A(c( 916-Ot-003.1 7c ESEC NO. -_ I 116-01-M.5 °° SEE SFC.NO. � y ta;irYr dd'Y.. '" 116-f71-007 _..,,.. �.......-....., .�"_.._ __..�..-_. ... .. .. ..-...- .A„ _ .... SEE. ;.. -_.-...- LINE MATCH i 1Nh .dam..,. _ - ._...,.., _ ,".,_ ...._SEE SEC✓... ^w, -�.. MATCH ,. rr ....-.W-"".'. `"EC,.NP.S.'B76 NO.116 .,•"•• r --.,YYI,Ytl-' nv tmo - -"'-'r aw4 umvww YnE FtRLbNAPoU PA.m CYSfM9tl L P w _, a Ntl NoticE r „° COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ® secTloN No lw SiwF.q__ti4YlA ..�.J ryr. - ®�L�. __._._ d _.... s. _w . ^,. .,Y x r Real Property Tax Service Agency r N AEFOF ouTHOLOw E s�an~.nn a count center Rlverhead,NY11901 Xnmr 1son "m � � ---� wu (21) ( °ANNTF..rvANCE,NLTFRA'fYOH.SALE OR k ' 0.sA Rv.e+mron tlY. v Wuve Oxw4m ,,,^. W Pabmtnu .- ......u^Si .._ ,y ..... OISIH�911P10Po p6hPdY PONPIQItl Of TtrF LL �. .......- -v. ..... #,�R"e- a Y b 109 m mm- -ILE EET A - xm Covnp Luw w 4 -�- ...... 3LtF FDLK GDUNT"R TAK IVIpP IS PROh 101YE0 ,,, N �wf5!.wu xOma ..... V✓tiv bblYhgUP bURiRYEN PERWISSIOrd CkF Ct1E al%l� Y. jdf. A90 Q _ neve Me 921ft1RY dR E]'..1A ea..L.s .. ®weunt�ri,ne i^ rau a.o�wx+tm.-._._. .. v,maui.wr+'-i4: urP'x 9. ..,.,,._...____ REGI.VROPERPV TAKSEfCNCEAGENCY M,,P ____ P qn' OI S'fRICPI'dO 10®9 PROPERTY AP.....,,, _LL... .-_.- ..,,. ...... R4.... AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD When to use this form: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring this form must be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission in accordance with Sections 239-m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law. Applicant Name: William Ackermann/NFVS Holdings, LLC Address: P.O. Box 633, Laurel, NY 11948 Land Owner (if other than applicant): Land Owner Address: Description of Proposed Project: This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Property Location (road and tax map #): 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-102-4-6.1 Is this parcel actively farmed? Yes No Names & addresses.of any landowners within the agricultural district containing active farm operations located 500 feet of the boundary of the proposed project: SCTM#1000-102.-4-6.2 (now 7.3): Howard Simon & Lorraine, 27 Stacey Lane, Madison, CT 06442 Attach a tax map or other map showing the site of the property where the project is proposed relative to the location of farm operations identified above. Applicant/Agent Signature Date ®,,, - - IVM1*?1131 ' ,�, .. SEE SEC NO"096 '" e ,. II 7!}7 SEE SEC MATCH PJIAT4ti ...... ", a 'y Yr iT.#i M1m 646 .,.... _......... Eo sra;mra�aroza� ,,.. hunaC +,. ._- $10 M, t/7J CAI '`v t. 4µ..1p da3raf P,khT[., LINE tlw 92aaY n„ �FCR4 NO ¢ w, 45 6Y Y O tl w .m.� ¢rerwNa€sGuro-roco d rv. ,6"w„ DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS)f9 @ °Y" or ^• tr `. 01.' 23.7 ,R,Po 12 0A SEE SEC NO r ""*.,, if G fF0 Cit r*'" d. a. "." •,'r ^ TONIVV Of15CUTHOLO ;}"- 09fr65-072 2 5 lW / 6 711na / "^v�`1,✓�A„ (OPEN SP ej 5 2A(C) 473 k8 fdl "4, ✓'7 185" ^"� ., ✓" d fl) „p I ars re s tl3.... "4x✓' e" x`` 4 "�°'w1 daA ,¢'" z r ""�, ti ,^I k ,A m ,.°.. 16.8A(c) ur Aoaux ° 23.3 w;,xFas strurrroao <„..„,,,. 9T F IJIi 1 Y I ,,n A'✓ "4'"a "+ ,4 =rh" Ltf.VEcoPME'Mr RFGFfFSt �' Gtd'('CHOGUE CdY"Y`k aP4 /' n µ ^ / hr.., ,� , CEMETERY `w^,^"* w•` h, "`w.«,x ✓ ,." '..,,, assere;wnoN �"� 1r ",. `'.. 16,3 'N�' M r" ~Yla 22.5A 0.11 27 O¢x S ,✓@ p'""+/' >`3„, "�°,." ,." ^r ¢TOWNOrsouTHOLD T^ O "" OE NELOPMEJTRIOHTS) 66 81 Pdµ lr :l¢ w e' 'w, �)...� M W., av f4 d z A „" 2u.± 1.' 4' d ° ,' / ",, s •d 20-07. ,,, x, '88"Ai'' a=' +3 .., Ply a f2 zs or w 4".4- G, 41 0 1 w, 81-1611 w ,1" w• 4. �( ql@ 41 w"¢rw„ m,� ,y � N c` ago' , 'r"'�.... W 5.2A(c) FOR PCL NO 92 SEE SEC.NO. 1 y. 25 6A A 1011-02-0211.3 .� `°�. � ``�,„� // �N" ti Ano- 1% ,s ,I4 p 9.1 141 to 33.3 3.9A(c) "2"` 4" ry Op wdx`` Q'' 45.6A(c) Ilk N` 0. �A A 12.5 23.1 ,ey WI N N, 17e, 5.1 2.OA 5.3 ri. ` 9µ"%w tl IF ('+ 1@ prn.,,,ti ry® , CUTCHOOUE SGK0O6 s DISTRICT s urNow r (rowNoesaw� ti wti p ,� �ew•� Via' N ,dam „ sevECorarENrarsNrsi �\� as ,�' 23.2 GAA FI wy ": wR• ® 4w c„m', 2.3A(c) ,.. ' •. `.« JCOUArrYOFSLWMLK � a, � o� •tl m� k @ fi , � .� , 9.z far, m � oiocucwrsl w m VYn 9 w• V 11 k iBA 1.1A(c) + �i w ¢ J �. 1.9A FOR PCl NO r V y qle 33.4 (C) 4,� ,Y.p- ,, 9.et�pa..2�m�J'^w..+�n� 3z1n(o) p SEE SEC..6 b @ > yw� 'r µr'`�q�(1 b 13.1 2119..A m h�4, � TATEOF CUIGIOOUE7FIRE REDISRIC T S NEW YORK' y@" 1 O O 72 ` �' °sbbn,,," «�.-.....• •; p" Z 20A Df'srM ivcaa F b «}" "a n �. RD¢aAN CATHaue er xartcee r,A ` to 1 TF 11 AE s';.u:Rn"D YUI:nakY ,r"uj 24 W V DEVELOPMEMRIOIffS C tr Ae^l d 10.1 y �, A 23A rop^ 9.1 �`,g�,� y v A p s ads y w Pw FOR PCL_NO. � .w ar, +@"^"' `7'"""'C „✓"" ....,.�.,...., 9 rC1R PCL!dO SEE SEC.NO. µ 34.' 1.SA A 8 S w Yµ �, SIZE NO. 11:194111-024.4 �Yd " (c) ry neaWAV" � x 1tl401.024.4 1It3 CV1 Of 3..2 4NE."'r +Cl' d"x "zr ._ � RrvATCH SEE SEC.NO.109 �u ,._.,._,.- -w.,. .,, ..-.. ,_-..�. �..�..m..... K ......,.,.�.._ --.... ww -.... ,.,,,....�,,..._ rwu � ECTION NO ... .... w.,,�..�..�,.�..,.,. -... ......... _.,�......._w....m....�... .. fNM. /k&P TOWN _ 4 F.«�. u NE �4Fm ..__,_ NOTIGE ''r me,' COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E . . SOUYHOLO 02- '--- m sem. (21) O P - am. �ArsERnnmee. erR (.. .... Real Propefty Tax Service Agency Y saf rm rvar..wuaeE 1 E or w, w.TTTAKMFp ION!11B1 h COYNtY GmIsFac 1.Far. 11901 " �4°.� ,..pan A ��......,.�. $IFFUIBCCDWNY4"Y"PX Y@IU°15 PNCJNI61Yl':6 GCN.EIN 6EET. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for at least seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon Fri. 9/30/16 Re: Proposed Site Plan for the Ackermann A ricultural Barn SCTM#s: 1000-102-4-6.1 Date of Public Hearing: Monday, October 3, 2016, 6:02 p.m. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-20031 Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date,place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (1) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant,petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested,posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property,nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant,petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. 1 NFVS HOLDINGS , LLC AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR THE ACKERMANN AGRICULTURAL BARN 1000 - 102 -4 -6 . 1 Proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. MONDAY - OCT. 33 2016 - 6 : 02 P . M . Southold Town Planninq Board Work Session — September 12, 2016 - Page 3 „Project Name: Purita Winery SCTM#: 1000-51-3-5 ±420' s/w/o Location: 5195 Old North Road, _420' s/w/o County Road 48 & Old North Rd., Southold p. _ proposed p .,.. � q . ) Description: This Site Plan is for the ro osed construction of a 30' x 90 2,652 s ft. addition to an existing 71' x 90' (6,422 sq. ft.) wine production building to expand the current uses of wine production and storage (not open to the public) on a 0.76 acre parcel (SCTM1000-51-3-5) with an existing single family dwelling and nine (9) parking spaces. The subject parcel is proposed to be merged with an adjacent 2.7 acre reserve area (SCTM1000-51-3-4.11) which is attached to ±18.8 acres of farmland (SCTM1000-51.-3-4.14) with Development Rights held by Suffolk County in the AC Zoning District. ... Status: New Application Action, Review for completeness. ..., ... p ..... �, n__ Attachments Staff Re ort I Project Name Ackermann Ag11 ri11 11 cultural Barn SCTM#: 1000-`1­02-4 11-"6 1 ...................... Location: 1350 Alvahs Lane, ±1175' n/w/o NYS Rt. 25 & Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue . Description: This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Status: New Application Action; Review for completeness, Attachments Staff Report Project Name Th � _ _ y 000-113 7-.19.23,. The Estates at Ro alton SCTM# 1 _ Location: 55 Cox Neck Road, on Cox Neck Road approximately 490' north of Sound Avenue, Mattituck Descrip tion: This proposal _ p p p is for a Standard Subdivision of a 36.9 acre parcel into 12 lots where Lots 1-11 equal 0.7 acres, and Lot 12 equals 12 acres, located in the A-C Zoning District. This subdivision includes 15.2 acres of open space and 1.7 acres for a proposed road ._ _.. Status: Conditional Preliminary Plat Approval Action: Review legal documents. Attachments Staff Report Project Name: James Creek Landing SCTM# 1000 122-3-1.4 Location: west side of Main Road, approx. 280' south of New Suffolk Ave., Mattituck Description. This is a Standard Subdivision of a split zoned parcel into five lots. j Status: Conditional Preliminary Approval ..... Action: Review submitted documents. .. _. Attachments; Staff Report Discussion: ■ Draft Planning Board Monthly Report for August 2016 1 Southold Planning Department StatF Report Site Plan Application Work Session — Completeness Date September 12, 2016 Prepared By: Brian Cummings I. Application Information Project Title: Ackermann Agricultural Barn (formerly "Belle River Properties") Applicant: William C. Ackermann Date of Submission: August 29, 2016 Tax Map Number: 102.-4-6.1 Project Location: 1350 Alvah's Lane Hamlet: Cutchogue Zoning District: A-C II. Description of Project Type of Site Plan: Agricultural Acreage of Project Site: ±22.7 acres Town Development Rights; Building Size 7,142sf This Amended Site Plan is for the proposed construction of a 7,142 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn on Southold Town Development Rights land; 22.8 acres in the A-C Zoning District, Cutchogue. III: Completeness Review See attached checklist for Site Plan Requirements. IV: Analysis 1. Existing: planted vineyard and pasture; Expired site plan for Belle River properties (March 2015) for horse barn and stables; 2. Proposed: ±7,142 "equipment storage and warehouse" building with a proposed area of disturbance of 26,702sf; Staff: the language used for the type of use should be removed from the site plan and provided as agricultural storage building (which is what is permitted on site); the storage building must be accessory to active agricultural uses on site and cannot be used for general storage or warehousing; 3. SEAR: Type II - Agriculture I 4. Code requirements / Bulk Schedule (AC):. a. Lot Coverage i. Maximum: 20% ii. Existing: 0% iii. Proposed: 0.718% b. Setbacks for the proposed building (AC) _--------- ...... ...... _ mRecuired Provided ......-- Front yard 60' 60' . .� ._. . ..... ........ ......................... ....................... �aa Side (SE) 20' 228' Side(NW) _,_,_,,_,_20'__(45 combs.. ... 251' Rear yard 75' J671'.... c. Parking: none proposed. This building is for owner use only; (also as required by Town Development rights easement). i. Two (2) 28' wide curb cuts to Alvah's Lane are proposed d. Drainage: three (3) 8' x 10' deep leaching pools e. Exterior lighting: photometric plan provided on sheet two (2) of the site plan; f. Exterior Signage: none proposed / specified; V: Staff Recommendations 1. It is recommended that the application be found complete for review to begin the coordination process; 2. Set public hearing for October 3, 2016; 3. Classify action as Type II under SEAR because this is an agricultural operation; 4. Send referrals to CFD, Town Engineer, ARC, LWRP, Land Preservation, Fire Marshall, Code Enforcement and the Building Department. 2 Southold Planning Department Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness - Section 280-133 Project Name: Ackerman Ag Barn Completed by: Brian Cummings Date: September 12, 2016 Received Comment A. Submission of a complete site plan application shall consist of: (1) A completed site plan application form. (2) The site plan review fee, as specified in Subsection B below. Editor's Note: See now § 280-138, Fee schedule for site plan applications. (3) A completed environmental assessment form. (4) Nine copies of the site plan. �l (5) Four copies of a property survey, certified by a licensed land surveyor. B. Standards. Site plan design shall include the following items: (1) Technical data: (a) The lot, block and section number of the property, taken from the latest tax records. 4 (b) The name and address of the landowner on record: 4 [1] The names and addresses of adjoining landowners. [2] The name and address of the applicant, if not the same as the landowner. (c) The name and address of the person, firm or organization preparing the map, sealed with the 4 applicable New York State license seal and signature. (d) Date, graphic scale and North point, whether true or magnetic; if magnetic, show the date of reading. 4 (e) A survey prepared by a licensed surveyor or civil engineer. The site plan may reference a land surveyor's map or base reference map. All distances shall be in feet and hundredths of a foot. All angles shall be given 4 to the nearest 10 seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in 10,000. (f) The locations, names and widths of all rights-of-way Waive for within 500 feet of property lines. If none exist within 500 X private Ag use; feet of the subject property, indicate the distance to the use GIS nearest intersection with a public street. (g) A separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. (h) The location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining the property. Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Planning Department (i) A complete outline of other existing easements, deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property. Q) Existing zoning, including zone lines and dimensions. (k) Site plans drawn at the scale of one inch equals 20 feet. If all required information cannot be shown clearly on one plan, the information should be separated as �l follows: [1] Alignment and schedule plan. [2] Grading and drainage. [3] Landscaping. [4] Other, e.g., site utilities. (2) Natural features: Received Comment (a) Existing contours with intervals of two feet or less, referred to mean sea level as per United States Geological Survey datum. (b) Boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, tidal bays, saltwater marshes, beaches and all freshwater bodies, including wetlands N/A and intermittent streams, perimeter boundaries of shoreline bluffs„ dunes and beaches. (c) The location of existing natural features, including but not limited to natural drainage swales, watercourses, wooded areas and wetlands, as defined by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Board of Trustees of Southold Town, marshes, ponds, dunes, bluffs, beaches, kettleholes, 4 escarpments, wildlife habitats, flood hazard areas, erosion-prone areas and trees of six inches in diameter at a point three feet above the trunk base. (d) The location of any existing cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the property boundaries. 4 (3) Existing building structures and utilities: (a) The locations, dimensions and outlines of all buildings, as defined in § 280-4 of this chapter, and all uses of the 4 site. (b) Paved areas, including parking areas, sidewalks and vehicular access between the site and public streets. 4 (c) The locations, dimensions, grades and flow directions of any existing culverts, waterlines or sewage disposal systems, as well as other underground and 4 aboveground utility poles and utility lines within and adjacent to the property. (d) The location and use of all buildings and structures, including curbcuts, within 200 feet of the boundary of the �l subject property, 2 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Southold Planning Department (4) Proposed construction: Received Comment (a) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements, indicating setbacks from all property lines and horizontal distances from existing structures, (b) The location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as off-street parking and loading areas and pedestrian circulation. (c) The location, direction, power level and time of use for any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. (d) The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be in accordance with applicable sign regulations. N/A (e) The location and details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing (type and location), and grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours (on site and 200 feet beyond the property line) and spot elevations for buildings and all structures, drainage calculations, details of drainage structures and watershed areas, where applicable. (f) Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site stormwater retention, in conformance with Chapter 161, Highway Specifications. (g) The location and listing of landscaping, buffering and street tree plans, including type, material, size, quantity and location. (h) The location of water and sewer mains, electrical service, cablevision and telephone installations, ground transformers, fire wells and fire hydrants and/or any alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. (i) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing the proposed use of floor area. Notes: N/A = Not Applicable Site Plan Application elements waivers: § 280-133 C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board shall have the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements of this § 280-133 by resolution at a duly noticed public meeting, for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, where the Planning Board determines that such modifications or any change in use will not require significant changes to existing major site design features, as well as applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture (but excepting retail winery operations), if it determines such requirements are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety, or welfare and to further the objectives set forth in § 280-129. 3 Checklist for Site Plan Application Completeness Submission Without a Cover Letter L-,(Ul I, G FAU016 Sender: (�� ` 1 Southold Town Planning Board Subject: n, qw SCTM#: 1000 - 1 02-4j— Co . Date: Comments: +1 CLQ b o /Jl S C P-Yb\, S CA L-wp, C� � Dov p S a OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A.SPIRO '" � (� �� a,�, Town Hall Annex LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR ^;; 54375 Stats Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us is° $kq (comer of Main Rd&Youngs Ave) Southold,New York Telephone(631)765-5711 00 Facsimile(631)765-6640 MAILINGADDRESS: P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REQUEST FOR AGRICULTURAL STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ON LAND SUBJECT TO TOWN DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EASEMENT Tax Map No. 1000- 109�?i I am the owner of the property described below and on which the Town purchased a development rights/conservation easement on or about (date). Name of Owner(please print): . Name(s) of previous owner: (if applicable) Mailing Address: HE ��. �, VE10 s Phone Number: e-mail Address: Property Location: �� t "+ 9"I , (!'1 _ size, and use g structure proposed: f ea �a�rlcu agricultural Ca .i List type, 1 72-aL- __114_4............... *Attach location map (survey, tax map, or sketch plan) showing placement area of agricultural structure(s), distance from property boundary lines, and any readily available information relating to your request. You may talk with the Coordinator at (631)765-5711 to discuss questions or to arrange to participate in any of the regular meetings of the Land Preservation Committee. //4/4/v f Applicant Date Please return the completed form with attachments to: Town of Southold-Land Preservation Department *All attachments must be signed and dated by property owner. C roll, eall tj fl m, ' /l � ) H ra gym. e ea. w 33" 1 " N'. M w. N, /�'�,��fi�. •,+mwa�..,..,,. "+awe, •w" P� w yW Id s I 14`Plate Height -8/12 Bata Rauf and n Siding _ - Metal foof ' -Concrete Floors ( � j( -Insulated Floors,Waft,Ceiling c F Beat i rp_ t —i 41 € I 7 —.—_.._._ — --._...... 3 i 3 t 37 xa i 3 ,r, nm ��\� als MIR dal\ -`_ LOU �Ioj Wks y " f e V J � Y N kNAI tib D EC� C� �, V' E SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOA �u L, 21q ?016 I SITE PLAN APPLICATION FORT SOl1tI1G!u TO•Nt1 Planning Boars! Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: s �QMVPJ Application Date: 1 / ,� ,�� ���f� PP Suffolk County Tax Map#1000--w?,- Oil - 6•/ Other SCTM#s Street Address: Ili4)_VIE�S LAW Hamlet: GLITZ"9400 Distance to nearest intersection. , Type of Site Plan: New Amended_Residential Zoning District Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list n=e, mailing address, and phone number or the NopIe below: Property Owner MFVS ffOLOal __ S A-1.-C Street 3 4L Mf e3-3 . LOCUI2E71- 10W Gc+r��to4+v€ l'�3S City CA!;"KrE J L-i9N"�L State Zip e Other 6 31- 690 n6_6A 2- Applicant Wl"I*A0%G/4QCFfM,4NN Street_&W _J-I4f ffl-WS C "ME _ _ City_tw"lfaub State &Y _ zip IM 7/ l eme Telephone_6��$'0 —6412- Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)*_ 19 Street City State Zip Office Telephone Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Site Plan Application Foran 2.%18..%2010 Site Data Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure 1/Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: Z-�g /sq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ac./sq. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No If yes, explain: a-VIF"� 1 l lt-15 SoLA Does the parcel(s) meet the Lot Recognition standard in Town Code §280-9 Lot Recognition? Y_N_ If"yes", explain(and attach any necessary documentation–title report, subdivision approval, etc.) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: 6/ Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: O-K(6014"VA6 —VINE` AZ fi p4s7*E List all proposed property uses: 6-ILI &A-TVILA PAS'Tya-e-4- �q u) Other accessory uses.- .N' _ Existing lot coverage: 0�_210 Proposed lot coverage: 0.7 % I Gross floor area of existing structure(s): D sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):�Sj Parking l� � �Space Data: #of existing spaces: O #of proposed spaces= 0 Loading Berth: Yes No�V _ Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: d % Proposed landscape coverage. © % Wetlands: Is this property within 500' of a wetland area? Yes No 1/ Maybe I, the undersigned, certify that all the above i ;' i-mation is true. Signature of Preparer: Date: r 2 Site Plan Application Form 211812010 APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK P/1� Gi Being duly sworn, deposes and says that he, k resides at Y 1� �� tCt � J__inthe State of New York, and that he is the owner of property located at l3 50 [� rS /-C.11•1� SCTM# e' or that he is the of�ue� "U of the (`.C'J�' 4- A- /o ILS )-FV t fir` (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) and said Corporation is the owner of the above property, which is hereby making a Site Plan application;that there are not existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan;that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way,has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads;that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same;that the plans submitted, as approved,will not be alter or changed in any manner without the approval of th PI ing Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in s ict accord c tli the plan as approved by the Planning Board. Signed ' l - � ---�— Owner Signed 6�4' (% (Partner or Corpora e Officer and Title) Sworn to me this �CAI- rr MANNA KCKKINW �day of HoUry Public-Stale of New York No.01 K06191941 GudM*d in Suffolk County My Conmtolon Expires Aug.26.2020 N sablic Southold Planning Department Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. Your Name: ' I FVS R ol-01 p,' g L L C Last,First,middle initial unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company. If so, indicate the otherperson's or company's name. Nature of Application: (Check all that apply) Subdivision or Re-subdivision Site Plan V/ Other(Please name other activity) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship includes by blood,marriage or business interest. "Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. 4 / Yes No V If you answered"Yes"complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of the person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person _ Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent or child is(check all that apply): A.the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B.the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C.an officer,director,partner or employee of the applicant;or D.the actual applicant Description of Relationship: Submitted this day of PK 20 11. Signaturer' 4* Print Name WILL. AOS AMSL~tj Disclosure Form OFFICE LOCATION: MELISSA A. S PIR .=" rj� Town Hall Annex ,;.� � � LAND PRESERVATION COORDINATOR „ �� � �� 54375 State Route 25 melissa.spiro@town.southold.ny.us (corner of Main Road& Youngs Avenue) Southold, New York Te1ephone-(631)765-5711 " Facsimile(631)765-6640 - ",_ MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971-0959 DEPARTMENT OF LAND PRESERVATION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2016 William C. Ackermann North Fork Viticultural Services, LLC P.O. Box 633 Laurel, NY 11948 Re: Request for Agricultural Structure Placement on Land Subject to Town Development Rights Easement SCTM #1000-102.4-6.1 Dear Mr.Ackermann: At its regular meeting held on March 1, 2016, the Land Preservation Committee members, in accordance with Section 25-50 C. (2) [3] of the Town Code, reviewed the request you outlined in an application dated 2/24/16, for an Agricultural Barn and an Agricultural Pump House. A partial survey (undated) with a hand-drawn sketch of the approximate location, elevation drawings (undated) and floor plan (undated) were included with the application. The materials presented with the application include a floor plan, with notes within a box shown on the floor plan pertaining to the building construction and the following in regard to the building uses: a. Equipment Storage This use is shown as being within the larger part of the "U shaped Barn building b. Workshop w/Small Bath This use is shown as being within the smaller part of the "U shaped Barn building. c. Garage w/Office Above This use is shown as being within a proposed extension to the Barn Building. It is handwritten on the plan that this area is proposed if adjacent lot is purchased and lots merged. d. Home in Phase 2 This use is noted within the "Notes" section; however, the location for this use is not shown. e. Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed This use is shown as within a separate building. During meetings we had prior to the Committee review, you clarified that the "Home in Phase 2" was not proposed to be located within the area subject to Town Easement, and would be proposed only on an adjacent 0.35± acre lot known as SCTM# 1000-102.-4-9.1. This lot is not subject to Town Easement, and you are looking to purchase and merge this property with the property subject to easement. If the purchase and merger occur, you are proposing to construct the house, and to attach same to the Barn/Workshop area, by constructing the additional building area shown as proposed "Garage w/Office Above." Due to the fact that the "Home in Phase 2" is not proposed within the area subject to Easement, the Committee did not review the "Home in Phase 2." In addition, the proposed "Garage wl Office Above" was not reviewed or approved, as this part of the structure is not part of the current application since the adjacent lot has not been purchased or merged with the subject property. The Committee's review consisted of review of the "L" shaped Agricultural Barn building (estimated from floor plan as being a building of approximately 96±' x 47' and 41'x 40) and the separate Pump House structure (16' x 20') shown as including the following uses proposed for agricultural purposes: • Equipment Storage. • Workshop w/Small Bath • Pump House: Chemical Storage, Fuel Storage & Irrigation System Shed The recorded easement for this property restricts the use of the premises exclusively for agricultural production as defined in Chapter 70 to the Town Code. Section 25-50-C. (2) (3] requires that the Committee serve as a review board for the granting of permits for the construction, reconstruction and additions of and to structures in or on agricultural lands in which the development rights have been acquired by the Town. The Land Preservation Committee members concluded their review and found that the agricultural uses described above, shown as located within the "L" shaped Barn building and' the Pump House, are agricultural uses consistent with the purposes and other terms and conditions of the recorded easement. Please note that the Committee's approval of this use within the easement does not mean that such use or buildings will be approved or permitted by other departments or agencies. The Committee's approval allows you to proceed with pursuing any applicable approvals that are required by Town Code. If you have any questions, please call, Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Land Preservation Coordinator enc.: application w/attachments cc: Building Department w/enc. Planning Board w/ enc. FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLDT N.Y_ NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 7, 2016 TO: North Fork Viticultural Services LLC PO Box 633 Laurel,NY 11948-0633 Please take notice that your application dated May 2,2016 For permit to construct an agricultural building at Location of property: 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 661 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The prgposed use re wires site plan a royal from the Southold Town Pianiti card. Authorized Signa Cc: File,planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1%JW11 ncan rvmex Receipt No. 88515 Southold, New York 11971 Date 6 m Co - Rec&ecl of l Q klb'- rV X II 1/147J4941- 1 OODollars For Loa Fee for Fee for Fee for Fee for Fee for Certificate Electrical ❑ Sign ❑ Flood Development Pmt. ❑ Building Permit ❑ of occupancy ❑ inspection ❑ Cash Checko [0 Building Department County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 5.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed use requires site plana roval from the Southold Town Pig f ie Authorized Signa Cc: File,planning - 45LYO FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD N.Y. ' 54ulltalO TOti`jn Planning Board NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 7, 2016 TO: North Fork Viticultural Services LLC PO Box 633 Laurel,NY 11948-0633 Please take notice that your application dated May 2, 2016 For permit to construct an agricultural building at Location of property: 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue,NY County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 102 Block 4 Lot 6_._1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Iltc uroiiosed use rc;ILlIrL:s sitc,lyl;III approval from the Southold Town l} tT ` cerci. ulhorized Sipe rlrrrc Cc:File,planning FOR INTERNAL USE UNL.I ttt[r N n SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATIO ftll Town initial Determination �— —P ingBoard r-' Date sent: ���---�- -- Date:- 7z;,�,, -— - VS 1 Project Name: - - -- f3 �-- 1 Pro'ect Address! -- —� _ L Zoning District:- 00'roJ� S-uffolk County Tax Map - Request' p orcin documentation-as to of Building Permit Apl�licalion and supporting g (Note: Copy f -proposed use or uses should be suhmitted') f 1 nidal Determination as to whether use is permitted*- ~� o whether site plat► is required:_( � / Initial-Determination as t Signature of Building I pecto Planning DePartment(P.D.) Refel+'al: Date of Comment Hate Received: � �- � - moi.. �h�� � ►�.� 1�� Commons: 4 0 Signature of Planning Dept. ff Reviewer Final Determination Decision:__ ' ry nt.NK Or AMERICA,NA 3210 North Fork Viticultuml Sorviees,LLC oP c:rzru P ().Brix 631 Laurel,INY 11943.003 t431d 68+�G8� ���• �� f f PAY TO M DOLLARS 1 - � —. :�I4p�� :,ti-asa c ±ts�--r•r...�ta?•-- •..i. •,l' '• i°Y W1111a•a C.A Y.irrsann i�c7l'sd ,r .f f / l�tQti` C .���� _i/'�,,,� �• iy� �'� � -!/�.�— —�i✓L�� ME � At u=a032�UII" =:.ar� 1i� � .'. �i: =,B 30RSz ., 2 ;u51!' V Expiwian _ .120 K120 V IE D Building Inspector MAY - 2 2016 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT f Date J a- ,20 16 BUUMING DEPT. INSTRUCTIONS TOWN OF SOUI'HOLD a.This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit shall be!sept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or fused in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever:Fntil the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described,The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ' 1k ' 1111,1 ,W.1 sem."� -_- (Signature ofapplicant or name,iia eorYsnratiml) c= xu t Ir r� iPut:aili�7 address P am h soul State whetner applicant is owner,lessee,agent,architect,engineer,general contractor,electrician,piurriber or builder Narne of owner of pre rnisesf , -- (M n the tax roll or latest deed) f 1 tp r nt is- CQ Ora ton ;il;nal(ire of'&ily audw iZ d.officer t'Nan;e and title of corporate offilcer) BuAders License No._ P1u_nbers License No. Electricians License No. _OtherTrade's L'cense No. 1. Location of l,l}�i{s tai % Lich pro lposed"'11lk-w/ill be done: r �IaE tl+fA - House Numbe. Street r Hamle' . . . . . . . _. ._ . . . . . . Subdivision —Filed Map No._ ` Lot _ 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy , y,W 4u(C' Vu Q Va b. Intended use and occupancy_, {, L.to 4 to f-C ��4 Cx r P n � &Z�-N 3. Nature o;work(check which applicable):New BuiUng V Addition Alteration Repair------Removal Demolition Other Work 4. Estimated Cost OC/0 - Go Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units ,.i/—Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars ►,={ 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use. 'r+CutUrC 4 ff i. Dimensions of ex' i`t1=~structures,if any; Front ALJr ; Rear_/J 114 Depth /t/M Heighttj Number of Storied f Dimensions die structure with alterations or additions: Front ., r' Depth �'[ Height. IQ Number of o i s • _` L fir, C PQ- t1 S 4 tji v t'-A%i t :r 8. Dimensions of entire new construction;.Front �� t� Rear Height Number of Stories A-0-' [E 9. Size of lar: Front tC f lh hear —q Depth r(M� P m.!YWLYf 10.Date of Purellase AZ"k 'f `�,20l' Name of Former Owner eelle W e y-1p alt(-1-#1 �-Lc 11.Zone or use district in which premises are situated A-(t 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation?YES NO 13.Will lot be re-graded?YES NO ✓Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES NO ✓ 14.Names of Owner of prenlises � Addressh Lcu s,,r.�['1tr��e Name of Architect , � 14 Addresyl� . :�' ` ' Phone No 0- Name of Contracto ��Adclr�ss q lstll Pr I'hn7ie Nu. T 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland?*YES _ _NO l✓ * iF YES,SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES&D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b.Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES __NO-_^•-- * 1F YES,D.E,C,PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey,to scale;with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 7. If e[evatian at any point on property is at 10 feet or below;must provide topographical data un survey, 8.Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES V NO ' IF YES,PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OT-NEW YORK) COUNTY Orsi,,? 1 �: being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant Me of individual signing contract)abovz named, CONNIE D.BUNCH (S)lie is the Notary Publks,Slate of New York -- -- — — — —---- ----- -- Nn O1BU6185050 (Contractor, Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) Due0had in Suttolk County O commlaelon Explres April 14,2 O a of said owner cr owners,and is dui_y authorized to perforin or have performed the said work and to snake and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and tilat the v;ork will be performed in the mariner set forth in the aprdlication filed therewith. rre this p( day of. 1- - ., •. . .. - - SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEED Recorded: 03/25/2016 Number of Pages : 5. At: 09: 48 :35 AM Receipt Number : 16-0045950 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 15-23869 LIBER: D00012858 PAGE : 049 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 102 .00 04 .00 006.001 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $0. 00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $25 .00 NO Handling $20 .00 NO COE $5 .00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 NO EA-CTY $5 .00 NO EA-STATE $250 .00 NO TP-584 $5 .00 NO Notation $0 . 00 NO Cert.Copies $0 .00 NO RPT $200 .00 NO Transfer tax $0.00 NO Comm.Pres $0 .00 NO Fees Paid $525.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 15-23869 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE County Clerk, Suffolk County .� Number of pages Mar qpj This document will be public ecord. Please remove all U Doon Sociai Security Numbers P 049 prior to recording, 2-a—; Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording/Filing Stamps FEES ortgage An 71Basic Tax Page/Filing Fee Mortgage Amt, Handling 20, 00 1 TP-584 2, Additional Tax -- Sub Total Notation Spec./Assit. EA-52 17(County) or Sub Total EA-521 7(State) TOT.MTG.TAX Dual Town Dual County Comm.of Ed. ----------- 00 Held for Appointment Transfer Tax Affidavit Mansion Tax Certified Copy The property covered by this mortgage is 00 or will be improved by a one or two ' Surcharge_ --_----_��. -lub lotal family dwelling only, Other YES—or NO ' � Grand Total If NO, 's" appropriate tax clause on page# of this instrument. 16008737 1000 10200 ` - --- 006001 `~-/ 5 Community Preservation Fund/ Rea/ Tax Servic( ( R POL A" Consideration Amount $ Ag 6 Satisfaction s/01scha rges/Releases List Property Owners Mail ng Address Improved_ VY-\I Vacant Land TD TDL LT' Mail to: Judith A. Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk :7:�Tifllee C�OlWpp�any Information 310 Center Drive, Riverhead, NY 11901 Co.Name by: made FSPECIFY TYPE OF INS rRUMENT) The premises herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK. . � TO In the TOWN of � In the VILLAGE Old Republic National Title Insurance Title Number: OCHAMP-060332S Page 1 SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York; BEGINNING at a point on the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane distant Northerly 1175 feet more or less as measured along same from the intersection of the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane with the Northerly side of Main Road, said point also being the Northerly line of Land now or formerly of Chester and Irene Sawastynowicz; RUNNING THENCE along the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane the following two courses and distances: 1) North 43 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 620.63 feet; 2) North 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds West, 4.52 feet to land now or formerly of Edward R. Grohoski; RUNNING THENCE aiortg said lands, the following two courses and distances: 1) North 43 degrees 05 minutes 13 seconds East, 150.00 feet; 2) North 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds West, 100.00 feet to lands now or former) of William J. Kerrigan; Y RUNNING THENCE along said lands North 43 degrees 05 minutes 13 seconds East, 277.60 feet; RUNNING THENCE North 47 degrees 11 minutes 27 seconds West, 236.26 feet to lands now or formerly of Franklin Blanchy and Malcolm Blanchy; a, RUNNING THENCE along said lands North 8 degrees 04 minutes 53 seconds East, 394.88 feet to lands shown on the "Map of Highland Estates", Map No. 6537; RUNNING THENCE along said lands South 48 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East 439.27 feet to lands shown on the "Map of Crown Land Lane", Map No. 6289; RUNNING THENCE along said lands South 47 degrees 26 minutes 10 seconds East, 1415.78 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 46 degrees 12 minutes 00 seconds West 348. now or formerly of Michael R. Crosser and Diane Sym Crosser; 55 feet to lands RUNNING THENCE along said lands and lands now or formerly of James D. Duffy and Linda A. Duffy, North 43 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds West, 274.24 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 46 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West, 303.60 feet; RUNNING THENCE North 43 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 334.04 feet; 1 -- Old Republic National Title Insurance Title Number: OCHAMP-06P033 age 2 RUNNING THENCE South a ad gree n minutes 50 of seconds v est 200.36 feet to the Easterly side of Alvah's Lan P FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Premises known as 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC `0. y: William C. Ackerman STATE OF NEW YORK ) ).SS: COUNTY OF�5,��,(�) On this L(:E4ay of March in the year 2016,before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State,personally appeared William C. Ackerman, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity and that by his signature on the instrument,the individual or the person on behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. NOTARY PUBLIC M CHS L CR'#l0 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED Moldy Pum Staft d Now Yot Na.o1CIS013110 With Covenant Against Grantor's Acts Clued"in Neseau melon ExpWa Ofttw 21,Oil Title No.: NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES,LLC Section 102.00 Block 04.00 to Lot 006.001 County or Town Suffolk NFVS HOLDINGS LLC Return by Mail to: Ginsburg &Misk 215-48 Jamaica Avenue Queens Village,New York 11428 11111111 IIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII VIIIA Illll 11111 IIII Illi SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DEED Recorded: 02/25/2016 Number of Pages: 5 At: 10 :54:10 AM Receipt Number : 16-0027918 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 15-20787 LIBER: D00012853 PAGE: 951 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 102 .00 04.00 006.001 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $545,000 .00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Filing $25 .00 NO Handling $20 .00 NO COE $5 .00 NO NYS SRCHG $15 .00 NO EA-CTY $5 .00 NO EA-STATE $250 .00 NO TP-584 $5 .00 NO Notation $0 .00 NO Cert.Copies $0 . 00 NO RPT $200 .00 NO Transfer tax $2 ,180 .00 NO Comm.Pres $0.00 NO Fees Paid $2,705.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 15-20787 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL JUDITH A. PASCALE County Clerk, Suffolk County / ' nti Numb,er of pages This document will be public record. Please remove all Social Security Numbers prior to recording. Deed/Mortgage Instrument Deed Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording Filing Stamps Page/Filing Fee 1. Basic Tax Handling 2. Additional Tax TP-584 SubTotal Notation or EA-52 17 (County) SubTotal Spec. /Add. TOT.MTG.TAX Dual Town Dual County Comm.of Ed. Transfer Tax Mansion Tax Affidavit The property covered by this mortgage is CertifiedCopy or will be improved by a one or two family dwelling only. NYS Surcharge Sub Total YES or NO Other If NO, see appropriate tax clause on Grand Total page# of this instrument. 4 Dist.1000 Section 102.00 Block nA nn Lot nnA 001 5 Community Preservation Fund RealPropet 16005076 1000 10200 0400 006001 Consideration Amount$ Tax Service Agency -CPF Tax Due $ �22-FEB- Improved 77i S-7, ess 6 KLUORD&RETURN TO: Vacant Land Attn. Hal Ginsburg, Esq. TD 215 Jamaica Avenue Queens Village, NY 11428 TD TD Mail to: Judith A. Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk Title Company Information 310 Center Drive, Riverhead, NY 11901 Co.Name 8 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part ofthe attache de by: (SPECIFY TYPE OFINSTRUMENT) The premises herein issituated in SUFFOLK COUNTY, NBmYORK. TO intheTOVVNof |nthe VILLAGE orHAMLET of BOXES 6THRU8MUST DsTYPED ORPRINTED|NBLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TORECORDING ORFILING. 0 C)ln(A1 -j96CJ 30q e CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USE BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the 4 day of February, 2016 BETWEEN BELLE RIVER PROPERTIES, LLC,with offices at 1345 Bridle Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935 parry of the first part, and NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC, with offices at 41r party of the second part, J WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of TEN and no/100ths ($10.00) dollars paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, SEE SCHEDULE "A"ANNEXED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part subject to the development rights in favor of the Town of Southold by deed made by Donna M. Ruttura and Samantha Ruttura, each as to an undivided '/2 interest as tenants in common dated March 11, 2014 and recorded in the r O Suffolk County Clerk's Office on March 21, 2014 in Liber 12767 Page 914. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party' shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. i IN PRESENCE OF: BELLS RIVER PROPERTIES, LLC Isabel Meltzer,Member Old Republic National Title Insurance Title Number: OCHAMP-060309S Page 1 SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Cutchogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York; BEGINNING at a point on the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane distant Northerly 1175 feet more or less as measured along same from the intersection of the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane with the Northerly side of Main Road, said point also being the Northerly line of land now or formerly of Chester and Irene Sawastynowicz; RUNNING THENCE along the Easterly side of Alvah's Lane the following two courses and distances: 1) North 43 degrees 27 minutes 14 seconds West, 620.63 feet; 2) North 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds West, 4.52 feet to land now or formerly of Edward R. Grohoski; RUNNING THENCE along said lands, the following two courses and distances: 1) North 43 degrees 05 minutes 13 seconds East, 150.00 feet; 2) North 47 degrees 02 minutes 58 seconds West, 100.00 feet to lands now or formerly of William J. Kerrigan; RUNNING THENCE along said lands North 43 degrees 05 minutes 13 seconds East, 277.60 feet; RUNNING THENCE North 47 degrees 11 minutes 27 seconds West, 236.26 feet to lands now or formerly of Franklin Blanchy and Malcolm Blanchy; RUNNING THENCE along said lands North 8 degrees 04 minutes 53 seconds East, 394.88 feet to lands shown on the"Map of Highland Estates", Map No. 6537; RUNNING THENCE along said lands South 48 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East, 439.27 feet to lands shown on the "Map of Crown Land Lane", Map No. 6289; RUNNING THENCE along said lands South 47 degrees 26 minutes 10 seconds East, 1415.78 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 46 degrees 12 minutes 00 seconds West, 348.55 feet to lands now or formerly of Michael R. Crosser and Diane Sym Crosser; RUNNING THENCE along said lands and lands now or formerly of James D. Duffy and Linda A. Duffy, North 43 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds West, 274.24 feet; RUNNING THENCE South 46 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West, 303.60 feet; RUNNING THENCE North 43 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 334.04 feet; 1 Old Republic National Title Insurance Title Number. OCHAMP-0603095 Page 2 RUNNING THENCE South 49 degrees 35 minutes 50 seconds West 20.36 feet to the Easterly side of Alvah"s Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. FOR INFORMATION ONLY: Premises known as 1350 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, NY 11935. 2 TO BE USED ONLY WHEN THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS MADE IN NEW YORK STATE State of New York,County of Suffolk ss: State of New York, County of ss: On the `T day of February in the year 2016 On the day of in the year before me, the undersigned, personally appeared ISABEL Before me,the undersigned,personally appeared MELTZER personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument,the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which instrument,the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s)acted,exe ted the instrument. the individual(s)acted,executed the instrument. (signatur ce of individual taking acknowledgment) (signature and office of individual taking acknowledgment) NOTARY PUBLIC AftW B. Boru hov Notary Pubpc, Shft of New Yon. No. 01806141655 QU&Wwd in Queem County Commission Expires Feb 27, 20.x. TO BE USED ONLY WHEN THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS MADE OUTSIDE NEIN YORK STATE State(or District of Columbia,Territory,or Foreign Country)of ss: On the day of in the year before me,the undersigned, personally appeared personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(S) is (arc) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies),and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individuai(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individuai(s) acted, executed the instrument, and that such individual made such appearance before the undersigned in the in (insert the City or other political subdivision) (and insert the State or Country or other place the acknowledgment was.aken) (signature and office of individual taking acknowledgment) BARGAIN AND SALE DEED DISTRICT 1000 WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION 04. 00 BLOCK 04.00 ��-� '�1 LOT 0 Title No. COUNTY OR TOWN BELLE RIVER PROPERTIES, LLC STREET ADDRESS TO Recorded at Request of NORTH FORK VITICULTURAL SERVICES, LLC COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RETURN BY MAIL STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Distributed by I GINSBERG &MISK Attn. Hal Ginsburg, Esq. �p Commonweafth 215 Jamaica Avenue W&IMAMMer1 ALANDA1IMrACONPAN,• Queens Village, NY 11428 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY W ` v LL LL O 2 O K O I " W LL 0 W U) Q' O LL W Q jW L W LU W N r Town of Southold L`VRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORNI I A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTNM Iu2 - N - 6 . 1 PROJECT NAME Al Fy S ! A C_V_ E R_1A A tJ,�J 13 A 12 h) The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. W Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital FJ construction,planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction) 1 (b) Financial assistance(e-g- grant, loan, subsidy) L� (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Y Nature and extent of action: Nps. CUso pprom ' r4 reej -� P lam►.;n.� i�.�+. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No Q Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ��I Yes❑ No I�J Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Location of action:- O i �.-1 1 1�/'1� C U-rQ-t O G VC Site acreage: 0.G r e Present land use: Y 1 cod+ V rOf t Present zoning classification: A It 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: W IL..L! (b) Mailing address: P-0. Bac 633, a L Y-, 19 9 9 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 7 G gra � D I (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No R* If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Xyes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable V, b r a r r �. �- k - u ,r l ri1 w' , ► t A4 hfi rnucft r Attach additional sheets if nccessar}° Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 1-1 Yes ❑ No Le Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable L �� � t��� �f>r✓a���, a►..Q #� �+e s►c.C� �� -� a� r�.►rr� �ne'(- ,'ny���4� I?5i r e- S44 G G t Vre f rYtla.. ���'r►c� ${�f d.�7`�-G I']dr�'� �'!G�f. a��r!—`�T 3fn t� -t+'�L� d'WY1�,y"$�'1.�-3 .►zn.n�r�3- rvbl►I�r frasl. r.� bC� r -yv � �►�_ i�a Attach additional sheets ifn cessary Aw t irr;gs'1';i►. W1�IAeJ. >'Cnet� dr bei- Y�lpRiV ed a.c�D9 NATURAL COAST POLICIES 1 Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria u Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No wNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary ✓ Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No VNot Applicable Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III–Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No MNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound,the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III–Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. El Yes 1:1 No LJ� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. 9Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable f e .0twerTV is Ae-Vr. OpMeAt-rla k b� Sold S insn[dL&—fr , &rj% Wil a wr' -VWS ut s G. 123 -12- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III–Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PREPARED BY 'C- TITLE `" 64m kyl DATE ■ Amended on 8/1/05 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION To be completed by A lioant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Wt"IptM hCK a -MN /VFVS P MRP 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality ,soun+04--D County SV r K 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections.prominent landmarks,etc..or provide map) 13SO AWAY!S L14A*—• EFAS>S S,Df OF RAO APP")c N00" A90A& I N"Crt*,v Wo RT; 2S t N Gv r e�14oC4V 9_ 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: � [] New D Expansion EirModifscationlafteration 0 P vi"wi mrnouv9 si i,r 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY- 6p.Lo re Wit: A& 7cwo ' 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately �2 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? W_ El No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS RESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? WHAT F�Industrial ❑Commercial RAgricutture E] Park/ForesUOpen Space Other Describe: (9RoP, P_" 1s Z2-•8'*-ZAs OF b" /* LAVD lAf 6)ZAPF V(IVFS 4A& P,+S1 U2[, S JMUAI DW4 A"A IS F IZAV-e o AMID P_ESi DAN CFS. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL)? Yes [jrNo If Yes,list agency(s)name and permitlapprovals: 11. DOE ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? MYes 13No If Yes,Gst agency(s)name and permittapprovals: TLPiS is IM✓ Amr--Npmem 10 SIF PLAN P2EvJ00fl.Y PAOR-OX1) B`l O)j j_WL.0 To" 001�-AAAN IN4 DIFF 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? fes 11 No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION.PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDG ApplicarWsponsor n me: Date: I( Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 Reset- ART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT D be com feted by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes [j No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.67 If No,a negative deriaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes Q No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING (Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1- Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: 1 C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development ' q lopment,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? 11 Yes FINo If Yes,explain briefly: E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? FI Yes Ej No If Yes,explain briefly: PART IDI-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS. For each adverse effect identified above:,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant, Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring; (c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope; and (f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain Sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. if question D of Part Il was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potendal impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large orsignificant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FU LI EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and aralysis abnve and any supporting documentation,that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting this determination Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(it different from responsible officer) .ol, ' ? �- �- low �--' J0, g%jR OF QCjFLQEMENTjNQM THIS INDENTURE, made this Sth daffy of February , 4999 BETWEEN Froom Zelfnsict, As Executrix of the Estataof Sophie Ksioskl,a�t-P - ie -CE�t--► deceased, residing at M Aivahs Lane, Cut&*Cue, New York PartY of the fit 1�1� P � i� AND the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.a Municipal corporation har4fl#s OffICS and principal place of business at Main Road, Town of SoWhoid, County of Sufloik and State of New York, Party of the second part; WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in const Wstlon of Five Hundred Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Five Dollars and No Gerais F j$547,275-00)laWful money of the United States and other good and valuable consideration paid by the party of the second pert, DOES HEREBY GRANT AND RELEASE unto the party of the second W, Ib successors and ssaigm forever,THE DEYELOpMENT RIGHTS, by which is meant: F the permanent legal interest and right, as authorized by section 247 of the New York State Garserai MWvc1*taw►as av waded, to permit, nsWlre or restrict the use of the prerNs"exciusively for agricultural F• production as that term is presently defused In Chapter 25 of the Town r r: E actually used In bans fids agricultural production as defined In General Municipal Law section 217. AND the party of the first part, covenants in all aspects to comply wfth Section 13 of the Lien Law, as same applies with said conveyance. The definillon of`Agricultural Production. as defined in Section 25-30 of Chapter 25 of the SoWt old Town Coda is as follows: ` Agricultural Production.shall mein the production for commercial purposes of crops, livestock and livestock products, but not r. land or portions thereof used for processing of retch merchandising of such Drops, livestock or livestock products. land used :n'agricultural production' shall also include fences, equipment storage buildings, livestock barns, Irrigation systems, and any other strictures used t. exclusively for agricultural purposes.' THE party of the first pari and the party of the second part do hereby convenant and agree in perpetuity that either of them or their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives or assigns, shall only use the premises on and after this data for the purpose of such agricultural production and the grantor covenants and agrees that the underlying fee title may not be subdivided Into plots by the filing d a subdivision map pursuant to SWIons 265, 278 and 277 of Y_ IV i Milli t'.jor3 • MY Ms.70MM SCHEDULE A e MRL! Afri tllil hl , fiir f�f fund, _ and tadtl0of dl"Uso fry t N TOM-of fi;ol�thoid, -of $41d��Maw yolfit WOOM at a point on the southsaatsuty sada of land now or brmiry of DrasloaoW, Casaldy and Vakrd3; RLINWA YM40 abn0 f!4 Waft#*as of M Oh's Lane loath 47 4"mm 02 minutes fill smr&6#4 1524.66 Net RUNN JV07?fOC!muth 62 dWm 37 minutaa 27 somwAs Wt,204.21 fast. AW# MO TRIM M ftitA 44 doww 45�ffdnut 21 t6 w*Wak 217.32 hk 0UMM THIMM Imth V401MO i'!'1MWAM aT astori&Ust,410.61 ftd; PA MMM Tt soAfi ��na�A*smfti 6adt.91.24 Mot XJWM i1 TffIM=0 43 dprw 22 mriluft 39 wounds flat,23tai.63 fast to rand now or ffortrwW of fps T�Wsc VA"end Comm; .r RL MM TH MtE idwm aid lands mouth 44 dfgraao 45 mlmita 21 s cm&IM*M 12.73 AW, IILiNi MTHM akttl9 slid sands and laflds now or f malt EuOonta 6.tfopulft south 40 ftNia 54 minute 10 SSW*lad 27LSD hat to WO ndw or bnrOly of htrol abatwA Uniatad; RUM=TMMIC!aW%said lands south 47 degmu 46 minutes 31 sseonds Wart, 360.i4 fest to lands new or fall"t'fy of dMINO VRwvW'a,LLC; RUNlVIfIiA rAt Q dom slid bods Om(3)aouraaa slid dtatanaas: (y) R&M 43 dogmas 23 ma AAm 17 wwnds West,M.23 fiat; ,i (3 North 44 ds9i+aW 41 nOMM 37 aaooads West,&M.26 fret; (3) Nath 47 da0rsss 00 minuts 37 wounds Wast,MM fret a lands now or fbrmsrly at 'lalaa3a 8stur MmOw,Ibwhard Mualisr and rho County of suffbtk; RYWM TW=ftj mW WA now or remafy rho tb Wnq two(3)=no snO dl s: (1) NeM 43 dsOr.as 36 Wm%s 20 a amft flash,329.27 feat; (2) No 42 ds0raw 24 mkwms W pounds Want!41LO hat to rand now or flonaarly t -�a�aid� 1-61101/s�R_f![sR.o00lr!-�lltntlOfatdi MUNNVO THEO=aWe land,noM32 41 mantras 3+4 seconds#a&.343.73 Bast to the W40AMY skis Of Amo Lane at the pftNt or phase of�. a9abri 9tfttAM 1"otuwry d,la! • Code of the Town of Southold, and the right to prohibit or restrict the us* of the promises for any purpose other than its present state of use, agricultural production. to the property described as follows: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying,and being in the Town of Soutt old, County of Suffolk and State of Now Yofk, bounded and described as follows: TA&mdcso Je ;P LS A lqoif ' MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING D MEMBERS SOF S *' q P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 DONALD J.WILCENSKI a Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR k �DU � l Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outholdtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Departmen --�— Date: September 23, 2016 Re: Deferred Revenue The Site Plan Applications referenced below have been accepted by the Planning Board and the funds may be processed to Planning Applications Revenue Account 62115.10. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map # .... ... �w. Amount Check Date Tvpe- -Ackermann Ag Barn 102-4-6.1 $752.50 8/26/16 Amended Site Plan JM MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SP.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �Q � Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J- CREMERS CA! Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY yp� 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR r'�{1l�i Z�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outholdt ownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: August 29, 2016 Re: Checks Please deposit the attached check into B691: Deferred Revenue. Fee is for a Site Plan Application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. ppA licant/Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Check Date/No. Ackermann Property Amended Site Plan 102-4-6.1 8/26/16 $752.50 North Fork Viticultural 1 Services, LLC #3330 I Ane �. ra- "� -- - •. •. - _;. � 3330 a BANK OF AMERICA,NA 034C32121 - North Fork Viticuitural S9rv'tces,LLC ; .o.Box 633 8/2612016 Laurel,NY 11978-0633 - (66 1)680-609241 o $*"752.50 = PAY TO THE -I-�wn Of Southold ORDER OF �-x,rx**x*xx*,r**x* DOLLARS L'I Seven Hundred Fi -Two and 50/100 Y f Southold .• .� f e,W- 6, J/ce 0 � � � ,.f ''} 'rr .s�r..,y.. • .fir a �3s � r .Site Plan Fee -�A ^^ '' 0 2 5 132 18 51I' F' n'00 3 3 301I' 40 2 1000 3 2 21: 48 3 ` r �. SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATE CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD °�Foell SUFFOLK C s c. ® LINTY, NEW YORK Z c < 0, S.C. TAX No. 1000-102-04- 6. 1 LO °Rs°R°ti �°F s '9�;Fc�ss, SCALE 1 "= 100' 00 JANUARY 28, 2016 4 Y s os 00, r° M F ss�o<IF AREA = 993,659 sq. ft. 22.811 ac. =a LU Z o L M row o � oti roa /01 F� oy °ti y �aO till 0�� f� cS� ° ctiO 'FF roti cF o r °ti �R, l lGj O', 2 ly �'fp oo '? C" tijJ 4 4�ti �� Qti° ?°' F p 4, p hyo ''0 �d J �AK-P`�o qs��94, eo a s, Q)� O 6�0' NOTE: (10 L� GRAPE VINYARD ROWS ARE NOT SHOWN. ° T� �L o 0�40�04° eo tiF 1 6' O e V ��• °iy 1 �Gk h�� ,��s G/p�C/0 YT91 soliT 7. .��� ��'�.F,• ,`fc� SI`3 liti r�L 1 �9i1 'YO 9 !� A F FP F tea' ,oGl 900°C, �� 1, S O r 9L °L ° �0 00 ssti � oti2S0 0 °F' ?�l 4D J� 2O �0'' r> �l N' PREPARED L I ACCORDANCE WIT UL-MINIMUM STANDARDSFOR TRV� � B BY THE L.I.A.L.S. AND (�$$NED _ CP car �ol�G�°�oSs� ITR SUCH USE TLNY T E ASSOCIATION -\j%:T C Crp ti s�4 o� s. �1fdD N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION Nathan Taft Corwin TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF Ill SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. Land Surveyor 51 COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING J THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED r S _ TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. (�� \ CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN Successor To: Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. L.S. 'Ro r1 ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Title Surveys — Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Loyout LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 11947 35-286 p!` d 3 p .. O7/7 /;�,:�7 p •, ;, Excellence Integrity Distinction P.O. Box 395 Fogelsville, PA. 18051 PHONE: 1 -800—KISTLER (547-8537) MEMBER SINCE E—MAIL: info@kistlerbuildings.com r' 1983 WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildings.com ,.a e ' ,- g }'•~ Acker MaNI Ste lEt AIv81SUt Grtst(ogu�r ?' y:' t' "'�d Lace T.r+ane-SyU A16`sgati P4gir{a« �+a'' irtrct lyaYR.,,> • q, `�,, �tiVarervil(e � ' -�. .T, �' '�RQ+ � �,+�ssauAoinf;� . ''>.,d", 't ::,; .,'r%.� Q" .+ `y�utchogxa.�5<'i;SS=�^• ,\t''\ . P'.'a'A.. r Gr..IQ a: •e,„ S, �y'.•....a•sC�"a'�w4ji `' s' _'gttltudk � _ � :i,t 'c h.' •�.`\:,Y`\'\°>y'',:A, 4> Lame •r ..tiff ,n a. , :� ,;• Raht�ta x. l . z:L.ne CATfI0NIVIAF' 00 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY 51GNATURE THAT I �o PER50NALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PLANS, AND HEREBY AFFROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAWN CUSTOMER DATE ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING, p;•, , ; FLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING p ANY CHANGES, AND I OR C05T5 OF CHANGES, BUILDING SITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET JURISDICTION: INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF KIM POLE BUILDING CO., INC.AND IS GM TO THE RECEIO IN CONFIDENCE. COUNTY: THE RECENER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY BLOCK# LOT# KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR 00, USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN; (2) NOT COPY THE DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS OTHER THE DRAW— S`�o CONST. TYPE: 5—B ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION O THERON;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE— p•, c'S AREA: 5,535 SO. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW— TOTAL ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,1 20 CU. FT. THEREFROM. , cc , r.r c: REV. REV. REV. 00 O, REV. REV. �j0 c'S REV. REV. REV. REV. i r REV. REV. REV. FOR: 4' WILLIAM A CKE'RMA.N.N ADDRESS: D U <�7�1< N Y I I GI v p' BUILDING SITE: br LAUI,E�L_ , NFw YC?p__ I I9_48 p; PROJECT: x 9� ' x I� ' �QUII�M�Nr 51'OI�AG� & -41 ' x -40 ' y, 14 ' WOhKSNOI` w/ A1'1'IC DRAWING TITLES: SCALE I _ �jQ' —Q I I CHECKED PLAN III �01 `01 I DATE: APPROVED 3/ 31/ 2016 Y. DRAWN BY: 1;Cr_ FIELD REP. MICHAF-L COCCO «'r DRAWING N0. SHEET OF K-1 -48G 0 1 1 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: 4'• r. 7 .ria. ..' ... 7—ff�?_7 94'-9" out/ out PERMA-COLUMN POSTS * — A. -- - - --- - - - - - -6" � -9 -9 -7'- ' " 8' 0" 3' ' X ----- Excellence I I e n c e Integrity Distinction sti n cti o n4- GF_NF_hAL NOTF-5 P.O. Box 395 Fogelsville, PA. 18051 A ! C ALL POSTS ARE TO BE MIN. 6300 2"X 6"S.Y.P. PERMA-COLUMNS PHONE: 1 -800—KISTLER (547-8537) ! 3 3 As SHOWN IN DRAWING. 1 ( 4 ) P05TFOOTING5ARE TOBE 4'-0"(MIN.)BELOW GRADE. E—MAIL: info@kistlerbuildin s.com \ �! ALL P05T5 ARE TO GET(2)GALVANIZED STEEL UPLIFT BRACKETS. MEMBER SINCE ALL POSTS TO 51T ON MIN.8"DEEP x 18"0 CONCRETE FOOTING PADS 1983 WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildings.com '. THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED USING 30-P57 LIVE ROOF SNOW LOAD. - -------- --- \ . — ESTABLISHED GRADE HEIGHT IS TO BE AT THE HIGH POINT OF THE ` a ---- ,;,- , } CUSTOMER'S LEVEL PAD. a \ j / / j / / j / / / FINAL GRADING OF6DILDING SITE BY OTHERS(INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) 9 ` UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR CONTRACTED. J .f..:. OCZ, ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO HEADERS, AN m SUPPORTS,AND TO BE#I 5.Y. P. KD 19. o \ - Q `7rr: y I � � � ALL DIMENSIONAL LUMBER THAT IS TO BE ATTACHED TO TREATED _ _ \PGT MATERIAL 15 TO BE ATTACHED WITH 20d GALVANIZED RING SHANKNA n — — 4 I - 0 PRE-ENGINEERED CLEAR SPAN TRUSSES @ 4 O o/c Q i = Lp ALL NON-BEARING MEMBERS SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO GIRT51L5 � •• %`�;': ��S4� :- ^U ``:.±";e. .•'� ,eS?a:c: .C. ..`'carbo,f "...,.4��".: TYPICAL (SEE SHEET #5 FOR TRUSS LAYOUT) _ PURLINS,AND DOOR SOFFITS TO BE#2 OR BETTER S.P.F. �J D ALL TREATED MATERIAL TO BE EITHER C.A.,OR EQUAL TREATMENT. ® I t I y Acicerm t lte East�, i T I �Y-tee-DENOTES CONCRETE PAD. Pte" r qb Alkermn 1 I n CutcFxve �,t '�:' fl -DENOTES(6300) 2"x P RMA- � oto ¢` C ; Y 6" E COLUMN POST. •,.� mai.. NY I DENOTES 6300 2"x "P MA- o {CTB 6 ER COLUMN POST WITH DOOR JAMB LINER. a:, 1193' \ e I ( ) 6' DOWN BLOCK. skiivt.3ar DENOTES 3-PLY 2"x 'TIE- Lane IsIdW Nassau Ret n�;', tr ci Fak: �► Mzst'• ss, a:...•K " v'. •�� I � \ \��• l} „`bi=Vatsrritle 7 :'�' �g •�� tw< \�,� .ti:�j�";N$aSau'PuipM., . = I i :1 ,.,'""�•c .-1•.+ .r 0�, �Utd109u9� ,'`n'' L° iLUd. ~`;Q fag. ,+, ` m".1 ;.i•.,. '''r�� \�'`A 0 I} CONS I pluc1' N N 5ShdeRtr�s,. u ti ' a. r ., 6 ,nom s mak :) d/ U HOLD ALL DOORS + 4"FOR CONCRETE FLOOR. — — - :,*ems•:. r ; .;e;, " \ � Nes'? � .�,•`, w �4 , � I?00� n�SIGN LOADING �>�''`•�{'°����-' �.: �`',,�j"' � �'> aen�; ~�.. J1 w i I II Id- TOP CHORD = 30-PSF LIVE LOAD ' z. 4, OO i IN CHORD 8P F DEAD LOAD Q O BOT CHORD 5 -PSF DEAD LOAD ' f' O w 0 � TOTAL LOAD- 43-P5F iLLJtaAret • : J Ln O0 WIMP b�SIGN LOA�I G g„r ra .. eat(S ta'. t'. I- ,. .; zWand - kj U ti �.. U Wand (L sl id i , 1 20-MPH WIND SPEED LOAD ''\ Q � ` .... p. CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP = o m �.. I.:OC'ATIC�N :MAP: x� I - r^ f ry w � ! : LU > LLJ p' o / p J 0 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO 4-1 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I w CONFORM To THE IRC Zoos BUILDING CODE.. PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PLANS - --- — w U NEW YORK EDITION. , o / z w \ - --�. o AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAWN ° w o CUSTOMER DATE LU 0z 0I � I o � ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING. A,. ` `• 1,., N PLEA5E CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING ,`•., ",, , I . I 14' CONCRETE FLOOR r �'•' I THROUGHOUT ANY CHANGES, AND / OR C05T5 OF CHANGES. BUILDING 51TE DATSECRET A I -7/ 8-O 8-O 7-4/2 NG - �` — - ---- -- - -- ----- -- -- - ----- — -- JURISDICTION: IN DRAWL ISTHEPROPERTY ONTAINS �STLERR POLEAND EBUILDI G O INFORMATION CO., INC. AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECEIVER IN CONFIDENCE. 3'-113/8' 4'-05/8' I COUNTY: THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND 2 ! I AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY - / BLOCK# LOT# KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE OR USE GROUP: S-1 TRADE SEDRAWING REr INF RMATIONCOPY ETHERON; (2) NOT COF OR THE OPY THE m ;"r \ \ r \ r \ 41- CONSTRUCTION r n" / 1 I1 f \ ( \ w • () ER THE DRAW- DRAWING, 3 NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EfiTl.� u: -------- IL CONST. TYPE: 5-B LNG OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION \ / \1 / \ / \` , \ / \ _ / / \ \w / \ 1 I THERON;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE- ° TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED / o TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,1 20 CU. FT. THEREFROM. I Uj O — I �\ B ( I I I I 4" CONCRETE FLOOR I w O I I THROUGHOUT I I ,✓ > I I - � g I - rfi- v � �ar l —�` R� 4/2 1/ 1 6 ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED 5TAIR LOCATION. I _ z O REV. Q w Ln p I \ / — — Q I o ; - REV. w m ( lu 4 I I Lu U = 4 m REV. o LU N r \ REV. I w w 1- w �_a / '� REV. > �D d I w REV. LU � I REV. O ° z � IREV. REV. 1.'.. ------------- -- I �- p. REV. REV. ,• I I I - FOR: 3 ' f WILLIAM A CK�'RMANN 0 ADDRESS: tel._\/�'\I-1 BUILDING SITE: x C L�`T`CHOG UEI , NY 119 x•.. 4'-47/,5" 2- I 15/,5' 8'-0" 8-0 (51-011 I (51-0 81-011 E'-�2�� 8-6 i 8-0 8-0 � --- 8-0 8-6 --- - - f ---- - - --- f --- --- --- f �� WINDOW & 1�OOt? SCN�nUL� PROJECT: SYM. TYPE OF WINDOW/DOOR MODEL# R.O. JAMB WIDTH HARDWARE GLAZING QTY. �I ' X % ' X -r 51MONTON THERMAL PANE 51MONTON TEMPERED VINYL SINGLE HUNG STANDARD ' O 3040 36"x48" 1 y" TEMPERED 5 53'-9" 4 I'-0" out/ out PERMA-GOLUIMN POSTS wlNDow wi scREENs a GRILLES SHW LATCH DOUBLE GLAZED 012KSNOh w/ A1"-"IC - -------- - -'-- --"---"--------"--'-----""-'--'-'---"""----------- -�• 3068 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/TH 38�"x LEVERED ERMA TRU TEMPERED X. X ' W 2 9-LITE HALF GLA55 ! COLONIAL PANELS 262HD 52y2" 4 9/G' LOCKSET INSULATED 2 IN LEFT HALF GLASS O 3068 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/ThERMA TRU 383/s'x 4 y��, LEVERED INSULATE D I DRAWING TITLES: 9-LITE HALF GLA55 4 COLONIAL PANELS HD 8 z' LOCK5ET 1 IN RIGHT HALF GLAs5 �'O5� PLAN �/ 16 I I I 1 X01 I COMMERCIAL O INSULATED STEEL RAISED PANEL OVERHEAD 14'x 1 2' 14'-O"x 5Yz;; TORSION SPRINGS TEMPERED 5 DOOR w/(I)ROW GLA55 INTERIOR LOCK I.R.P. 12'-4° C INTERIORLOCKS GLASS "NOTE: ALL DOOR5 AND WINDOWS MUST BE APPROVED FOR 120mph WIND LOAD SCALE: AS SHOWN CHECKED BY: DATE: 3/ 3I/ 2016 APPROVE BY: DRAWN BY: 1?C� FIELD REP. MICHAF-L COCCO DRAWING NO. SHEET OF K--7-4860 1 5 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERED ONLY. 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL .,•' ROOFING PANELS — TYPICAL — CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP k i E E 1=i.::E1Eil1E;i ;1+I E: #It :1i#3l , ' ElEi i E 3'#3£;sI 1 E III E �I• � 3I 1 1I 3I I i �I l — 27 G A. PRE— PAINTED STEEL ;E: lIF:• sl lila I !I: rl i`.i• I I'I ;.. l;.l' l I I: SIDING PANELS TYPICALAL it a i 'li i ' I `I I! i ,i < t i x > , F 3' .i 1, „ s +3 3 I I i E i I I� .. . . , :.3: ' I#: + ...: : , •,:. :., ., :t x. It I'+'ll', 3111 l + I' 3 ,C$ I 1,' i E i l 3+ 1 ( I 3 I.! I: $ i 9 ,I i 32 i lit 3 3'd 'k 12 i' IIi 3 I 3' tl. I' I. I I1 .�,l3 ;TIE l Til# E.i I 3 i I+ `i ') I 3 I, Ii 3 t' !il ##! I ,i ;3 ;; i! I 1 I! I I 11! 1 3I 3 iE i ,i i' i j i; ij 3 E I li I I' I• 31 I', l l i i } Is it I:" 31 'i" ,E i §j €! 3 t t.'' 3 t G# i li I ! I ; ; 3' I ak jj# ! I 3. 11 $ 1 I 3 I' I I :.i: EE: I Er .11:1= Excellent e Integrity ;x. El.i 6 i It i,i' Distinction i# I 1 ! lil 3:' ll�l i11� 9 Y i} t: i E :!i ;" I' i 3 £ 1 I I t E a , Q �'I i:+ ii ''i $ E is I i I 7 ilii 1 is 3 I ii' Ii I'' II I ill E' 1 1, li 111 I il' 1: iE 3t , I' illi I Q ii I .r' 3;;1'; II I ill ; LU l;F" II E:I' ,i i'I ! I I �i: I" ill I I — I: I' i 1 I:1 jjE '$ I 1 I ii �i, IP.O. Box 3 #3 95 Fo e l' I I I Isville PA, 180 51 �?! ii I= I I 1= U s I I € i' I E I 1 I+ .1. I ;1 iE ! LL_ ,, x I I. I„ I, ..3 i.i LIj ;i !;i E• y1i : , 4 I: I I i 3i ! ` is si it �;. a� 'iii E!! ''i 1! E' i "Ili is i i li III, ill' ,I !•I �+ ! 3€. t i 3, I it :E } '1 i I 3I =� it I # 4 13 „ I Q p # :s '3 i 3 I i i P I= i I HON li I KIS LE j� $ I! T R 5 7 ! i � i'I 4 853 `i 1:3. ! l l 7 I i .E I w Ilii I I �! i 1 1; ; lI i O lI i'I i e ,! I li lE i ! "I ,"! ! it I I 'li !I i :i II �''I '1 1 I' i, I I E ! ! i'I I 1 i` 'i I'. I. 5 I l E—MAIL: , I I I i f I II In oC�kistl I Ierbuildin s.c '1 3om !' I it E ,: i E w < x I' li I r I I 1* } I I, i !E MEMBER SI C '1 N E 1 I. i' t i I I I 3 j. 1 l; I'' C I ill ,I I I s! I'I I' i li 1 I I I I I i' I , li 1 u i I I + B i i I ! I 1. 1 i I' 1 Q I i I(l I 1983 t � 3 1 I I 1- I � E II II I' I' 1 I � I 1 I { I i I I I i ':I � WEB I �I I SITE. www.KistlerBu'I i Idn s. E tom •I 1 E 1 ! i I I al 1% i I i 9 I: I 1 i ('I Ei! ( — U ! t E I 1' I " I !: 3 1 31 v I ! I O I I I i ! L r 1 il.` I �'I I 3 ! i I l ilit ,{'i II. Il 3il I I I { i i' III 7 z. 1 & G * A : 3 I I ! € I I I i! , I 3t „ r ' 1 : , 3 l ! ' l ! a l l , l : l t•. �:t•,� I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I II � — I ill I' i i I II ii i I."d ! , Ili i � .ir I' I c•'\'�..: I I: 'i N 1 ii I I I w , Lu I' I I' I 1 I 1 i I 11 13 I +I i I I g I t ` I I •I 0 11•I' I I' • l 3 ! , : l l , ,, z , w• "� ! ! 9 1 I i , I i i i Ei i I I II I 'I 3 II �,yy�yy • I I i'. I I I` . '0' 1 y$ \ c a o , , 3 l 1 : I I I I 1 1 I I I pp 1 ( I I I N r' y ! I I I I I I � J I I I I Tt I li tp a• t I I' N O I I •Y 1 I +I t I I ••__nn I E _ F 1`r I � �l I P � 4 '.•v p' it n r S I 1 I I I Rdcd'tnahn to t l s� € I S as I I I L' I I I I I P *Y 'I i i I'E I I E I C Ic I u 'ue' I �r Alv ahs ho f b :h PJY I I ! II ' ; i I i l , I I �' �.-------� �• ,.<� .��.� �gruel n (m 35 g l:r�:a.54u v�sxu i enris:a cb ,et.ra�\. 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL WAINSCOT PANELS — TYPICALNO r10N 115I I E —011 : :�a .,�� �,�faterctlle 4 .:''��� `�� � � �''QW��' <§.a,`.�;±�s4Y,u PoIE�>��•:,.; ,ql `;i,- � �..,'.. �y�± 'w.� f"pGautchtWue tip 14, z ^' hiHe aby�r&64."• w.i". tG� tsr �'� ..n�,... ..:vvl i,'t A�-•i`!\,e.:�� •�`�_�: ,=' ,�R., ,t�s li i"` � ��. 7,\ MRTd`Q$r ,M4itucYt,."'`" ',,.1t +E, .t<=��plJ' :.1 ,�:Fs t�,',,�'<,<.�:.� \a. �' ":r • :. 27 GA. PRE PAINTED STEEL TYPICAL — CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP ROOFING PANELS : I , , i € I : E E } i I a # a 4 E I € # ( I iF 31 i 1E' ':E # i e I !+ Ro I+ 3' I i I I+ li I ll ; I i'I a I I s +I I E =i I Y3 ! I +I Ex. € „ , ;i E , # j] 3 ie 3 . E I i it L.t}CATI �P I i I i I i I ! ! ( 13 I I I 3 ! 3 3 !, 3' 'i�.3 'i F�•:• I it 1 li I i # E E3 i I is 1F 3 i l ¢ II�., 1. I j +E; I I; I `wt♦i #' I £ lil l "E 33. I rE I' 1 I I { is it #i I' { 2 E € ! ii E i; `t� 1 I (I (� I: !3: ( I i' ! I' Ei. i I I II # 77 jj I, t'€ li• 3;'I f :• j. ti Isl t ! I .. �w . II Iif} �II 'I , ,i 'I 1 I1g ,I+l, +l £ i ! #.,31 ; l ! . ?{! � �,.. � II }� 3IIi 1IIi ,i 3'lI, I!. 1 1IL. ti I HEREBY ACr.NOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURET THAT I i[ fI.EE i , 3I I PERSONALLY AVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PL NILLANS AND FERE>3Y APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAW 0i IJ i i i I I 1 it I' I I E ! f I, 13 I Ll i I I ( ,I i 11' is+ I f 3 6 3 IT E I CU5 OM A I R DTE i I II i I ,I l r ( ! I RTM I; I (n III �I Ii E; ii I i 1' ( I 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL LL_ I I, IIi it ';I i Ill i Il SIDING PANELS —TYPICAL I ' ;I ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING Ilij i iil!I I+I iE I';ii! ! !i I jEi; 1 ANY 'CHANGES, AND / OR COSTS OF CHANGES. 1 ' II BUILDING SITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET 11' INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF KISTI ER POLE BUILDING JURISDICTION: CO., INC.AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECEIVER IN CONFIDENCE. THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE COUNTY: DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL '— AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY BLOCK# LOT# KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE WAINSCOT PANELS — TYPICAL 50( �"N �AS�' VA�'I ON I / 8 I 1 J I 1 1 -011 1 DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THERON; (2) NOT COPY THE DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS ETiHER THE DRAW — CONST. TYPE: 5-15 ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THERON;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE— Ti TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. IFT• DRAWING,TAIN THE OR UPON DRAW— ING, ALL OPIESTHEREOF MD ALRETURN EL MATERIAL T.` TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,120 CU. PT. THEREFROM, �`. 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS — TYPICAL CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP `i f i:• ( }i' !3 t: t r .. � E :t! .'i t'! :.• .:: �.5, :}' .{. .IE iii: €.: i !! 1 3 IIII i #I i'I• I i"i� Ii !� E•I'I ! 3€ 3 t.i 73. I" S+Ii `1 1 i1 l :l E' 1 xi i# i i 1• I 3 i is .i '(: 3 � :I i' j E E ti l'I E S 1 i It 3 A q I; •4.' I I I i i. 1.i 13 i Ei , I I Via, !+ € E3 I ! 1 rNN ' 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL i I i '3. £ 155 i I 3 { i i I i } # I I E£ SIDING PANELS TYPICAL ( I 3! I '1 Ei' II 3, # I :E 3. E, .'i. I=: I I 1i'3 1 I I 3 +E i 1 I I I I ii 11 3 # I i" li IEi i3 1 , E i I 3 l I j 2`• i. I 3 I' "i I p� I1 �E # 4€ 'i E. Ili I IF II ll 3,. I I II i i i fl= I ; 3 {3 .3 6. j+ E: 33 i <I i !3': E Et E .E 'ii !E ! i, I it i I I � , I , } ,} li i, 'I 'l, 9 i° ! I i i! I 3 I Iii IIi ill �t 3' `E i% li i3E i3 # �- =1i' is I $ i£ I ; t'' ! I Q E : !!: i li I� `i I� i, 3 11= l lE li ' • .. : ill 1 i� 'I i l! '�' ! t :! � '= 11 4i. 1111 3 I ii€ !II 1 Ill l i i:'13 €i I' w I k;! �i i' `i I I E E I I': ! Ill` iE ! i'' ::I'• i i I; I, i 31 I i i I I !€ `t� I' 'i i:l' I it i.lx# i; I I k I n3 I i I!E' I E 3 iE ii 1 i I iF• i' I # I 'I { i € �.lLL i i i i 3. Ii 3 I I 23 i' I• # I I t E i ! i } 'I i3. SEI I.I:.. i I i O •I' I' .I .l I t �E I E iE El I I II 1 i 3t ! I I II f ti ,I, 6 # I I it I i 33 I 1! I O i v i ,I I i E I I 1 I 9 I' { I I i 3 Is I _ •I 1' I €li II Iaz II 3 I l I.i 3 I I I♦ I I!3 I II ii,s � I — Ea i I lIi I II,•i r El I I I I i !I !l': I I 6. I I' 1 I h I I � I Ili 1i '1 I O REV. 4/2 1/ I 6 ADDED ED CUP OLAS MOVED STA I LOCATION. •31 I ,' is l w•• i '�'i 1 I �I I i) I' li Eb li 1 I I ; I I , t I I 1 i i I I I i1 E. II l I I li I i 3 I I =i s i ;.I s 1 li I I. �a'� i li l II it I I I - I 1 I I REV "I I I I E' I . - 6� t I EI V/ I ' E 2 1 I ( I El I I I'1. I. i I I:' 1' I' s 1' I: I I ii I 1 I t , �I .I ) I I II I I 1, 6 I I 1 I 1� i # I i 1 I 3 i iii li i hI''I it I ' IE I :i I'' i l ; I i r ' � i - � LL_ I i' I ! I I I � I I I , I : 1,# ; � 1 I+ I I. I I �i I ; II 31 p I+ I ' I I II l.I I: i l I ; EE O l 1 I i I: E II ii 1 i�l N ki I !�' ,i i Ij J I 6' I !j R Ev. rI II i El 1 — :Ii j l i Il' I I I it 1 +I I it ! 1. I I 1 I: ii i 1 {{{ Il I I ! I i I + I , i'I i� III' r I z I I. I'I I i.• 'IREV. i Il „ I3 I' I I. li I'' I I I i 2 _ 1 I I - 1 I IIS I ! I ! € I REV. +Ii 1 1 l I ! l l ! --------— ---- - l I 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL Rte' JOUTH V V I�5-r [� [ �VA-rI ON 1 / (5 1 1 I 1 -011 WAINSCOT PANELS — TYPICAL REV. REV. REV. REV. 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL ROOFIfJG PANELS — TYPICAL — CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP — REV, — -- -- FOR: 3 3.. 3F i; i 3 I: 3 ; 3' 3 I: tE' I 3t I i. €i Es, 1'• ii I E3 I` I l; : E 1 I F' }' ':t 1 't• i� '333 'i ; j: 1' ;f': ilk I; 1, •liF !I { i I IE I I' E I I I !+ I3 i I' ; I tt li �II I. E E ii +; t i EE ; E I `3 1� it 1� Ei ! I I. i, 3 e 1' I I IF I ADDRESS: i? l,, EE.: S. 'E' # '3' 3 I E 3s I `l I i I' 'I I !'E I. I € I' is 3' E3 # l}i # i # I� illi t i3 I s• 3 !' E I I I 11 E i � I ! O� 1. 1 O � x� i' i iEt ,3 � fi il` I ! i !I •3 'I i S <I, ,{::; it :'I'• 'j' I: !I: '3' ti 31,1 I# 73 I.E3 I i 3 II i it Ei 'i iI'. i! ii iiii IIF l ;II E E,sE il: 1° E 3 I II li iE E 3 3! �i O L�I ii II 111 � rt"N O •i 3 E� l i' ['� IS l i if l:l l l I 3. I` 3 i is ±I it 'i 3 I, 3 I t ITE F E:: !l' I t I'f. ;i, '1 i I I, E` ,. I i is; I'i is 13 :i,s i3. 'E'i IE F: I' i'E, 1 77 3I': 7I E ll IIi iE ;`< I t Ii I:I I i ±i is i+ 1�1 l= E' `3_. ,!.l BUILDING t i' ; 33 I it i; I 1 # t #� 33 i i. ; E ii:.f 'I'i'i E E ' I� l:'E:# 'i� '.i' it :I, '.i' E I. 3' 3E I i #.!SE il: 'I' li £I EiiE( w E!: 1 3l!i I I�:' 3, .i I , I 3 I, ii i; F t Ii #3 li' 3 i ;` I l i' E ill, j' i' I # SITE: I:�'E� E I!= l+ 3, ;' i 1 I; ; li E I{I I I � Ili i' � L-- i k 3. ill I 3E i " {j 1 k O , I.! 3 E,1 €; 1 ilI I' € € II.. II; s II+ �jl# .l } ;; ,I 3:1 I' 3` ff lili i• ��' I: E !' 1. E `I.: Eli I l; 'll x€ I II I 31 i II ll i I; ,Ea ,III i' €E 1!I 1 FI � I' ,I is C U`i""C I--I O i G L�I� Y �I= N 9 0 � I I 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL I i i' I Ii I I'I I� I ! I' I. Il 3`.l j3 ! f I I I IE — ! ! rl I I I I PROJECT:PANELS — TYPICAL I I; ll I it jj I s I 1'i: 3. li •I l I E li I I: ii I 'ii � I r I i I i II+ I I :l i '' r• •i li it I I l : I ' I I 3 ' 6) I' I IE +E ' I ll I I f I E 1 II; i i I 3 I I / Gl- x 5 1 x �- � UI� M�N1` Q �'OI� 5 � �/� & i it I 1 i r I Fi I la I I I ,l n i si I l I lis 1 I I I rl! AA I I I' !I i I'I'I I I h I: l 7 I ! I I I I' I I N i i J I l ! I I I i i 'sP 1 1 II I I I 1 f I I i Ili I: I I: i II +I I ii I I I i I I �I x O tel- x �- W hK O SN p D w ii A-i"'f""I C I'1 I / 3 ' I' i11 I I I' Ili ! II Ei I I I ;I 3. I'I I I I i,l I;, I n ill I I• i Ei I' I j I 1.11 I: I'I Ell II' IE 3' is I IE: 1 I I I I it I III I i I k I I i+l I :1 II I,I I l I' I i I I� iI II I' I! I ! I: is I s '13 J III DRAWING TIT I I LES: I i ! E I. !I I li II, i I ;) I I 'I 1131:, i it l ( ( } 27 GA. PRE— PAINTED STEEL -- El � I I I 1 I i • WAINSCOT PANELS — TYPICAL I ! 1 t ------------- SCALE. A5 SHOWN CHECKED • BY: DATE: �j/ 31/ 2016 APPROVED C s , :• BY: 11 I 1 -011 DRAWN BY: pC� FIELD REP. MICN,,,ii COCCO DRAWING NO. SHEET OF Q-7 -WAI 2 5 ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSED ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: r CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT 'moi ; ' Excellence Integrity Distinction 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES ' " 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED ATTIC p AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH � � P.O. BOX 395 Fo elsville PA. 18051 AT 4'-0" olc w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS X'•. `` TRUSSES AT 2'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING g REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER ''\\ ' \ AS REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER PHONE: 1 -800—KISTLER (547-8537) MEMBER SINCE E—MAIL: info@kistlerbuildings.com com "f 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL 1983 WEB SITE: WWW.KistierBuildings.com 12 , ROOFING PANELS - (25'-G" RUN) ROOFING PANELS - (25-0 RUN) \ 12 ` 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS - TYPICAL P 1 'tua39?r f f f•" 11 II j 2 x 12 JOIST AT MID `•Ftderm nnSlt e SIMPSON O � a At ' EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP r a Cute "e F\ a= Alu 1n ..: POINT OF STAIR LANDING �,Nv 2"x G" CONTINUOUS 2"x G" CONTINUOUS - _.L. ^0 ..Uu, ".v;, f• )f25�-".�p " .4{...,,`i'hQ�••�Y Yxu. ' FASCIA BOARD2"x (2) 2"x 12 2400E-2.OE MSR FASCIA BOARD (2) 2 x 1 2 240OF-2.OE MSR ^�" - ': t •? G " CONTINUOUS SUPPORT TRUSS SAVE OVERHANG TRUSS EAVE OVERHANG CONTINUOUS SUPPORT -DOUBLE 2"x 12" JOIST/ TAIR SUPPORT ;. '' p' • . EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT ! , horeLu Rttep! .�t1 ?%• , '..'` .;,. r.i, t: �`.,,.tx�`:.: '�:: ,i, '�`',.' ILI p! < IiII01k R >`, 'aiPN 1... >,•"es".t" tiJ+ tBMtk»f>'b ,i i`t.% «,art^.;s.�.":L<,.`:+#8ek•}}�� '^ `.'e,.�,a.. ,. � (n ...gave,•a. ^<.�.....}-,�,`,,` - g `�, ;�,. , t I ( • « 1 1 f • . ...,:x « • 3-PLY 2"x 6II GLU- 3-PLY 2"x 6 GLU- ry .rte• a- ,.., :, � .• _ - ��? Laurer r.:•i•E' •:�s., .,, `.:,+- ,::: .�.,,.. ,. 1D STAIR CONFIGURATION u� LAMINATED COLUMN LAMINATED COLUMN \ { c� c� z u m. „ I UPPER RUN R J P yy z +tom I +' �{ II II 1: :w=, . r� 2 x 4 Gl TS 24"± c •� Ro/ @3 6 RISERS AT EACH 9 TOTAL ISE F' I 6 0 R � u 3 ._ I TEA AT I I EACH I I 'f 5 TREADS C 3 II RUN 4 ♦ « +I PGI LOWER RUN 2"x 6 SYP #I LA RT 3 " " (I I) RISERS AT 6/4 EACH - 6 2 TOTAL RISE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I FOR WAINSCOT (10) TREADS AT I I" EACH - 9'-43/4" RUN �,• PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THE5E PLANS, ` :�'' A °• o o. a AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS DRAWN ° ° 2"x 10"TREATED CONT. ° n ° p'. 4" (3,500 PSI) KE-INFORICED SPLASH BOARD 4" (3,500 PSI) REINFORCED �'.. CONCRETE FLOOK THROIUGHOUT j CONCRETE FLOOKTHROUGHOUT CUSTOMER DATE l 2x10 ,... .•.:....: SPLASH ARD ` ' ESTAB. DF' 4" CRUSHED STONE BASETHICKENED IMPACT SLAB AT 4" CRUSHED STONE BASE GRA — 30" O x 24" DEEP --- #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA COLUMN #5 RE-BAR THROUGH DERMA COLUMIN -- 30" 0 x 24" DEEP - GRAD C? CONCRETE COLLAR L_ I AT CONCRETE COLLAR ELEVATION AT CONCRETE COLLAR ELEVATIOIN OVERHEAD DOOR OPENINGS CONCRETE COLLAR o ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING. 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING CONCRETE POST BASE STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT STEEL UPLIFT RESISTAMT BASE w/ 24" COLLAR ANY CHANGES, AND / OR COSTS OF CHANGES. ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. ANGLE BRACKETS -TYIP. —f ,�- 41'-0" OUT/OUT POSTS 8"-DEEP X 30"0 CONCRETE 8"-DEEP X 30"0 CONCRETIE 4 1'-0" OUT/OUT POSTS BUILDING SITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET ------------- PAD - TYPICAL @ ALL POSTS PAD - TYPICAL @ ALL P05T5 - --_--- - - INFORMATION, S THE PROPERTY OF KISTLER POLE BUILDING JURISDICTION: CO., INC.AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECEIVER IN CONFIDENCE. I 1 -011 COUNTY: THE RECIVR BY RECEPTION AD RETENTION OF THE DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND I I r - II BLOC # LOT# AGRREESHATEASAUMORIZED IN WRITING BY STHAT, CINC. IT WILL NOT USE THE DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN; (2) NOT COPY THE DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS OTHER THE DRAW- CONST. TYPE: 5-13 ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE- TOTAL AREA: 5,535 5Q. IT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,1 20 CU. FT. THEREFROM. 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP 2"x 10" SYP #I VALLEY RAFTERS AT 4'-0" ON CENTER REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER IF- - 41' PRE-ENGINEERED ' l � � TRUSSES AT 4'-O" ON I I CENTER 20'-G" CLEAR;SPAN PRE ENGINEERED MONO =`` SLOPE TRU55E5 AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER I r-- 2"X 4" S.P.F. #2 PURLIN AT ±24" REV4/2 I/ 16 ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. ------- - MONO SLOPED TRUSSES AT 4'-0" ON CENTER 12 of O/C TO BE NAILED FLAT AGAINST TO SIT ON 5"x 287/8' BEAM (BEYOND) 7� l �� TRUSS W/ (3) 12D R.S. GUN NAILS R� tfylr• \\. 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ..\\�.. j Rte' ROOFING PANELS - (25-0 RUN) j T1 Ti 11 REV. 12 SIMPSON H 10 or EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP ,-o\ SIMPSON H 10 or I �7 REV. EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP - ' i - _ REV. - - _ ,• __ - ! REV. i 2x 6 CONTINUOUS S - -- � '.• ,'«• (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE MSR FASCIA BOARD ( 8 O„ REV. L II TRUSS SAVE OVERHANG 5"x 28/8 GLU-LAM BEAM CONTINUOUS SUPPORT EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE MSR REV. 5"x 15/8" GLU-LAM BEAM CONTIf�UOUS SUPPORT - TYPICAL < D_ I REV. A:, N :`•. L � � REV. REV. O a/ I �_ 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- _~ FOR: W 1D LAMINATED COLUMN p WILLIAM A CKERMANN 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 2411± o/c ADDRESS: O +I 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT O LSI-( I-t O l. I-I Y I I e:�-7 1 T• FOR WAINSCOT BUILDING SITE: I � � � -\// H I f3 L-�N ° o. •o a n 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. ° 4 (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORCED �}" (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORGED CONCRETE FLOOR THROUGHOUT SPLASH BOARD ��ONCRETE FLOOR THROUGHOUT Cl�"I"C1--fOGL,I� , NY ... ,: .• PROJECT: �ST A r •I I STAB. 4" CRUSHED STONE BASE 4 CRUSHED STONE BASE �) X �� X GRADE -- 30 O x 24 DEEP — #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA COLUMN ,GRADE - 30 0 x 24 DEEP O CONCRETE COLLAR AT CONCRETE COLLAR ELEVATION o CONCRETE COLLAR 41 ' y, 40 ' x, 14 ' WO .K51OP w/ A-"'1`IC 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN BASE w/ 24" COLLAR STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT I DRAWING TITLES: ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. 8"-DEEP X 30"0CONCRETE C 4 I -0 OUT/OUT POSTS PAD - TYPICAL @ ALL POSTS SCALE: A5 5HOWN CHECKED BY: 1 -011 " ' —O" DATE: I� 206 APPBovED I DRAWN BY: I?Cr_ FIELD REP. MICHAr-_I_ COCCO DRAWING NO. SHEET OF K-�-q"B6 O 3 5 Ir ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP CONTINUO S YNIT(5P51 WWF QAELEY RAFTERS AT 4'-0" ON CENTER p�•, `. �,,, '`7, yam,,. ,ul "'�' o«:;: •' \ i 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± olc TO BE NAILED FLAT xcellence �n Integrity Distinction 2"x 4 PURLINS @ 24 ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT 4 1'-0" PRE ENGINEERED GABLE END TRUSS AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH P.O. Box 395 Fo elsville, PA. 18051 4•.,' :"w 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES ,f` AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH 9 AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS NAILED TO FACES OF GABLE POSTS W/ 20D - PHONE: 1-800—KISTLER (547-8537) .'` REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER RING SHANK NAILS, (1) NAIL PER 2" NOMINAL r' MEMBER WIDTH IPER INTERSECTION WITH POST E—MAIL: info@kistierbuildings.com W/ 2 X 4 RE-GIRTS AT 24 O/C - TY . "' MEM1E9R831NCE WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildins com 12 -,A. 12 y p ,•. 12 Y'+1a S U IA i 7 tr. \'r ?�. ,... 7 l f� Erma !lte s r• IVIS , `Est r •'A `•b tch tte +.. '��- ' glvahSlJ'i 119.5 Ez:'`• 4 a' a^�g r n n Sou 2 x 6 CONTINUOUS Lone t: `a .i• Dan ,- 1. 611 CONTINUOUS _ :�,; $ r ;..p \ r,,r,�t �,� \\ 2 x CON N ,,• � , �;.:•,,A a,;,i,_ e• .,.�:, FASCIA BOARD FASCIA BOARD • II II .Vii; •,',q �- •'apa �, �,�1rtcNngue,,_,,,\ °:`�t x. ,'...r. 11 II {.fi,: i\� Et<e x 12 2400E-2.OE MSR _ ................... ............____,.,..,_ (2) 2 x 12 2400E-2.OE MSR CONTINUOUS SUPPORT \ ,,- 4 �' (2) 2 '\ CONTINUOUS SUPPORT ' II II "`• .` °-:�(4 \ ^l t ^'_. � 1Y. '" °^a..' 2II x 8II SYP #I HEADER 2"x 8" SYP #I HEADER 2 x 8 Jill SYP #I HEADER w/ 2II x ;Wows aoa 2 1HEA I SYP #I DER(BEYOND) 09o- k'3��t/aa `t� `�.:`s C�✓�uulfaVk.I.ivs .,a z` y:Ctt,i..�^` n a'r; 1 �� �.�L,�tA�tnti( ��,`1i 11 NZW ,d"•<^ r.:°btR4^!?fl� .:�4..:'.\.\: (n� " a 3-PLY 2 x G GLU- �:L `\ �� „�'• LAMINATED COLUMNCz , '\ • `fa . 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- LLJ L LAMINATED COLUMN z I , "yy,�,,a RaLexu III II II ^\ \'• � 2x4 GIRT5@24 ± o/c � — 2x4 I I • trx,.i' F.��'.c^'.�t�n��r s :�'.a,`:: •.'i 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I FOR WAINSCOT I FOR WAINSCOT PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND TH1^SE PLANS, AND HEREBY APPROVE CON5TRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAWN CUSTOMER DATE 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. +:• ESTA -,. ___.. _ SH BOARD ESTA SPLASH BOARD i GRADE I I I I I I GRADE I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I I I '�- #5x 14" RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA- I I 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN I I I I I I I I I I I 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING, L J L J L J L J COLUMN POST AT COLLAR ELEVATION L J BASE w/ 24" COLLAR L J L J L J L J L J L J BASE w/ 24" COLLAR PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING ¢' —STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT ANY CHANGES, AND / OR C05T5 OF CHANGE5. LL-I 4_1 r r -1 r r ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. r r r r -i r -I r -1 ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. Li—J L L L L L L —J L L—_J L__J L—_J L__ r' 1 I 8"-DEEP X 24"0 CONCRETE I I I I I 8"-DEEP X 24"@ CONCRETE DUILDING 51TE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET ? PAD - TYPICAL @ ALL POSTS AD - TYPICAL @ ALL POSTS p ;. 1 3'- 11211 14'-9" I 5'-3" j 3'-1%z" - - - - - 7F' 14'-9" � 71 �" � 5' 9" 141 911 � 31 611 8� OIC I' 7�zll P CO., INC.AINFORMATIONND IS GIVEN IS THE PTO THE ROPERTY ORE EVER INF I(ISTLER S CONFILE DENCE.* - -- — _- -- T - JURISDICTION THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE T''.. _ • 41 '-0" OUT/OUT POSTS 4 1'-0" OUT/OUT POSTS p'.: - — -- --- - --- - ------- -- - -- -_ ---------------- - - - -- - - --------------- -- ----- -- -- - — --- EES THAT,E EXCEPT ASRAUUTHOR ZED N WRITING BY COUNTY: DRAWING p`• SOU �AS�' GA(3�� ��AMI NG 1 / 4 1 1 _ I 1 _011 SOUTH WF,S-" GA13[_F, N�AMI NG 1 / G� 11 __ 1 _011 1 BLOCK# LOT# DKISTLERRAWING POLE BUILDING Co., INC.O Will C NOT USE THE DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN; (2) NOT COPY THE DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EITHER THE DRAW- p CONST. TYPE: 5-13 ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE N®TO RE- TOTAL AREA: 5,535 5Q. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,120 CU. FT. THEREFROM. CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP ci 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED ATTIC ' TRUSSES AT 2'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER , ?.. . . 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT -' 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± olc TO BE NAILED FLAT 4 I'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRIUSSES AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 1 2d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH 12 '"` '�J AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACIING AS 3 1 1 1 G� REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER REV. 4/2 1/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. 12 -'''• -~-- 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL REV. 1)\\\ ROOFING PANELS - (25'-G" RUN) 7 - �, -�.--------- REV. /A REV. C) 1 /i I , REV. f,\ 12 �r I 12 1 1 7 2"x 12" JOIST AT MID �// 7 REV. \0 1 � f !; �.------ / POINT OF STAIR LANDING REV.II II ':^_.__rr_:._r—_-...xv_.a.^-+ucar,..-^c__ 2 x G CONTINUOUS _ " FASCIA BOARD 2 x G CONTINUOUS (2) 2' x 1 2 2400f-2.01f MSR I FASCIA BOARD Rte' (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE MSR I r CONTINUOUS SUPPORT CONTINUOUS SUPPORT - DOUBLE 2"x 1 2" JOIST/ STAIR SUPPORT TRUSS SAVE OVERHANG R� EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT i I Q REV. L REV. I j cf) REV. R � 1-- O w 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- � ~ 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- FOR: Q LAMINATED COLUMN o 1 LAMINATED COLUMN WILLIAM A CK-ERMANN z D lI I 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 24"± o/c i ADDRESS: • � 1' I � N 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT FOR WAINSCOT 41 BUILDING SITE: • A 9. 4" (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORCED C NOG CONCRETE FLOORTHROUGHOUT 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. 2 XI On TREATED BOARD CONT. PROJECT: SH BOARDSTA - �I ' x �5 ' x 14 ' ESTA 6300 SERI ,, 4 CRUSHED STONE BASE THICKENED IMPACT SLAB AT GRADE ES PERMA COLUMN RADE 30 0 x 24 DEEP — #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA COLUMN BASE w/ 24 ; I I " COLLAR O COINCRETE COLLAR OVERHEAD DOOR OPENINGS AT CONCRETE COLLAR ELEVATION —41 ' X 40' y, 14 ' WOPK5HOP w/ A1"11C 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT BASE w/ 24" COLLAR DRAWING TITLES: STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT p r —I r —I r —I r —I r -I ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. .�;•,;�_."«;: < ' L —J L--J L--J L--J L—_J 'k 8"-DE 24" 4 1'-0" OUT/OUT POSTS I -8"-DEEP X 30"0 CONCRETE PAD -ETYPICAL @ ALL POSTS ,k ,k 0 ( (51-011 81-011 8 G ------- -- PAD - TYPICAL @ALL POSTS k II 1 I, 1 " .�,;:-_:,•;v •; - - - CHECKED — --------- -- - — SCALE: AS SHOWN BY: 4 1 -0" OUT/OUT POSTS APPROVED 'w -„ -- - -- --- ------- -_- - -- f I 1 I 1 -011 —0 1 1 DATE: �I/ 2016 -, [-F-F1' �N PWAL- _ F PAM 1 NG 1 / 4 I I _ 1 —011 BY: DRAWN BY: pC� FIELD REP. MICHAEL- COCCO DRAWING NO. SHEET OF K-7- 1'860 4 5 ARCHITECTURAL P' ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: T, --- — -- ------ 15 I'-G" out/ out PERMA=COLUMN POSTS--- --- — _ -- — — — --- --- pd < 301-4,Y21190'-9" out/out DERMA-COLUMN POSTS 30'-41211 < '` G!1�u�'a�tBl�� • ��i'•�„I• K ..I;,•IR.���IQ+ �` PLASH BOAR ".x I 0"x I G' SPLASH BOARD 2"x I 0"x I G' SPLASH BOARD = lo 2"x I ON I G' SPLASH BOARD 2"x I ON I O S 2"x I 0"x 14' SPLASH BOARD 2"x I 0"x 1 2' 5.B. 14'x 14' SPLIT SLIDING DOOR 2"x I0"x ! 2' S.B. 2"x I 0"x I G' SPLASH BOARD SPLASH BOARD T-1�" 8'-0" 8'-0" G'-G" 4'-0" G'-33/4' 14'-9" 2'-1 1 t.' 7'-15/8 3-L�/' 7'-I" 7'-I" 31-I /a1 71 L 5/sn 81 On 8' 011 81 011 41 011 61 611 81_011 81 0„ 71_1 W211 ,:.;,:. r 2•«IL ®� ^,•,63 _74 I o 10 Excellence '°` Integrity * Distinction — P.O. Box 395 Fo elsville, PA. 18051 Rt 2 I' 2 ! ' 2 I (D) 2 2 I (D) 2 1' 29' 2 ' (D) \.:./ 29' (D) 29' O 2 I 2 I' (D) 2 I (D) 2 5 � (— -T — T- -f __ _T-`i---T — T — — N — — T — _F -T- — — _ _ _ T�`-1 PHONE: 1 -800-KISTLER (547-8537) _ E-MAIL: info@kistlerbuildings.com o =1 -� �- jfj �- -IJ �-_ �- -�- -� 0 MEMBER SINCE WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildings.com s.com Fn I 2 1' — — 2 I' — — 2 1 — — 2 I' — — - 30" SQUARE FOOTER AT 1 30" SQUARE FOOTER AT 2 P — 2 1' — — 2 1' — — 2 1' — — 2 P I g a 5 I' C.S. SIDE WALLS 5 I ' C.S. SIDE WALLS � I I L I ,.;� J.:k.•..�.d.: {� `•x4Y�ontC est `�. d w4+ J I II V 1 L I I 1 Ct.. i _ - I O or 27 S UARE FOOTS I 3 Q R - I a r I c� �o AT I C.S. SIDE LLS a� \.. ry r • .`..._ _ AT 4 I C.S. SIDE WALLS I _ II - i' Laurel u _ - 5 I'LRU RF-ENGINEERED CLEARS N 5 I -0 PRE-ENGINEERED CLEAR SPAN — I I AA +� 5 I - 0 PRE-ENGINEERED CLEARS AN SES 4-0 o/c-TYPICAL @ '.J q�` b.\ r s ; y F, TRUSSES 4'-0" o/c-TYPICAL 25' 4 I'- O" PRE-ENGINEERED CLEAR SPAN — @ TRUSSES @ 4-0 o/c-TYPICA ,,, - - - - - - 125 �• � � `' . o� I ♦ / 4 1'-0” PRE-ENGINEERED CLEAR SP N / t TRUSSES 4-0 o c-TYPICAL — - - — A erma nate _ _ d $AlvahSLn Cutchbpve• TRUSSES @ 4' 0" o/c TYPICAL UJ >' ' 29 L9 I .t �, ��, f QPM a 3` cn cn 5 '•� `.� N cn t�-� eocn �1/ i 1 ( I X 11935 �. .i.'' X - 0 I - } _ - - F- 1- "4ARs.<. -il;ctparc:;,. _ I - 3.3 (D) 33 (D, - - r` Lorgl (xl�o� �. cn cn O O I 'lc ?a L O OXA '•°"a R' ✓�,„dVateriit,e .r? ;r%4i,_ \� .': t?q, `>. Z Z N I N Z Z '' —PERIMETER INSULATION AT I 33' 1 1 33' I I BOTH END SECTIONS ONLY A4, / ,�T . �I 1 O F , 29 e lr�-;, F. , . ,R, , • ,I ea `291 (D) I O OF°; `. : r, Vit_ a :;.� Q Q = I - O O - _ `� Q Q �y tFw \ .a �4 tJ�M.fvlo 4am _ :. .k,i::1.< ,,,,a.•.?.' :: ,..,;s::r=':,:F >. O O I I CONTINUOUS ROOFLINE — — CONTINUOUS ROOFLINE I O Ow° �} E cu - 4 — VJ —� yyss I 1 I LU LU ( O :mss+ D O 3 C ) Wb' J I ( I' 3.� I � Q q �t? \ \ \ � I I `Y I E I� I V/ `va+ J�J - -u ++ LatuCef'�-'. ••', I .. I i. I fel ,t 23 R h a t: 4 X 1 R O O I I _ _ D O O I - I `l 1 1 1 1 ..`hay.'•_„g^,A i II I u ( I : .. ... a x m 4 CONCRETE FLOORLn \ I TIIROUGIIOUT • N N 1 1/ ( / 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I 251 29 I I (25 PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PLANS, (D� Q 0 0 � I AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS DRAWN 3 1" O or 27" SQUARE I 1 -1 J FOOTER AT 4 I' C.S. m ( L 3 1 " O or 27" SQUARE FOOT R — — J (� I L - - - - JI L ! I - - - -sl=V7A7LT- — 25'F_T19 F" L ! I 11 A�4't' C-�- �E7VrA'tt5 CUSTOMER DATE _ _ _ _ En 2 I 3 t 14'x 14' SPLIT S IDING �> ! (D2 — 0. — — — — — — 21(D = 0 2.I' 1 1 (D) 2 I1' (D) c� 30" SQUARE FOOTER AT 30" SQUARE FOOTER AT !' (D) 2 11 (D) oOI 'tr- _� �- -1 5 I' C.S. SIDE WALLS I— -1 r--1 I- -it--�-� I- -I�- -1 I---I r- -I 5 I' C.S. SIDE WALLS I— -� ---� LOO ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING, � r --- --;---- -- �� — — — — _ � — — *, � — — �� ��� __ — — �� � �► PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING 2 P S 2 P 2 1' (D) O 2 I' (D) 2 P S 29' 29' (D} 29' D) 29' S 2 P2 I' (D) O 2 P (D) 2 I' S 2 I' Q ANY CHANGES, AND / OR COSTS OF CHANGES. O �•/ O BUILDING � 51TE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET � 11 71.93/411 51_21 4'-1 1%411 14'-911 41-33/41 51-9/811 1�/ , 14'-211 31 17 51-9/811 41_33/411 141-9'1 4'-11%411 51- 211 71_93/411 14-9 7-9/4 INFORMATION IS THE PROPERTY OF KISTLER POLE BUILDING IQ I-_ 71-93/411 14-9 �� I - -- -- — — _ — ---_ ---' --- — ' _ JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CO., INC. AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECOVER IN CONFIDENCE -f ______ ________________ yL ____..___ __....._ ____..... .____.__. ....._.__ ._.-___._. ..-_._ ._.._ .�L- ...._..__. ...._. .._.._.__ _____._.—-_._—__.__. ..�-.._—.______ ___.___—_. �L _--_--___—__—___—._----___. .__—_.__—_ .�L...-- S 2"x I 0"x I G' `� THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE 2 ,1 2" C " ' " " ° G�N��AI, N0 5 COUNTY: SUFFOLK DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND ct) �_ x I 0 x I G `�PLASI�i BOARD SPLASH BOARD �_ x I 0"x 18 SPL..A�I-i BO,ARD I 2 x !0"x 1 G SPLAS�1 BOARD ?_ x 1 0 x I h' SPLASH BOARD cn AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY BLOCK# N/A LOT# N/A KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE 301 X211 351 X21 20 0„ 351_11 301_21 ALL POSTS ARE TO BE MIN. 6300 2" X G11 S.Y.P. PERMA-COLUMNS DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR AS SHOWN IN DRAWING. USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THERON; (2) NOT COPY THE ''� POST FOOTINGS ARE TO BE 4'- 0" (MIN.) BELOW GRADE. DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EITHER THE DRAW- - 1 5 I'-G11 out/ out PERMA-COLUMN POSTS x ALL POSTS ARE TO GET (2) GALVANIZED STEEL UPLIFT BRACKETS. CONST. TYPE: 5-B LNG OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION w ----- — --- ------- ----------------------------- -- y� N ALL POSTS TO SIT ON MIN. 8" DEEP x 20" 0 CONCRETE FOOTING PADS THEREIN;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE- I��AN 1 / 8 I I I 1 -011 0 I I THIS BUILDING 15 DESIGNED USING 30 -PSP LIVE ROOF SNOW LOAD. TOTAL AREA: 5,535 5Q. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ESTABLISHED GRADE HEIGHT 15 TO BE AT THE HIGH POINT OF THE ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED CUSTOMER'S LEVEL PAD. TOTAL VOLUME: I 16,120 CU. FT. THEREFROM. FINAL GRADING i =11-DING SITE BY OTHERS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR CONTRACTED. r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO HEADERS, I „ SUPPORTS, AND RAFTERS TO BE #I - S. Y. P. , KD-19. ,. on cn m cn as rn ALL DIMENSIONAL LUMBER THAT 15 TO BE ATTACHED TO TREATED c D D a E) c� I MATERIAL IS TO BE ATTACHED WITH 20d GALVANIZED RING SHANK NAILS. ALL NOW BEARING MEMBERS SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO GIRTS, Ln U-) Ln Ln L._. .--_-_ .__...._. _..__ —__ _.__.... .____ _____ .—. -- _-__ _...._. _____ _ _-.__ _ PURLINS, AND DOOR SOFFITS TO BE #2 OR BETTER S.P.F. N N N cv N N N N N ALL TREATED MATERIAL TO BE EITHER C.A., OR EQUAL TREATMENT. a 1 2_' TDB — — 1 2' TDB n o a o I � � � � y!.15a°counNuousow nnLOFT suPPorzraerwi � � � � I i`�- '-DENOTES CONCRETE PAD. N N N N I JOE BLEEHASH, ARCHITECT N N N N I -DENOTES (6300) 2"x G11 PERMA-COLUMN POST. P.O. Box 892 13 -DENOTES (6300) 2"x G11 PERMA-COLUMN P05T PA 15601 WITH DOOR JAMB LINER. I Greensburg, !4' TDB !4'TDB I ,;; -DENOTES (3- PLY) 2"x G"TIE-DOWN BLOCK. e-mail:•bleehashOa mail.com NY LICENSE N0. 030422 I I I Phone:(406)551-0654 REV. 4/21/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. I I G' TDB � z ! G' TDt3 I I CONS�UC1'ION NO Rte. S 10/5/ 1 G ADDED STAIR DETAILS AND UPDATED ATTIC CONFIG. 5 1'-0"x 20'-0" O I I „ O HOLD ALL DOORS + 4 FOR CONCRETE FLOOR. ATTIC STORAGE U I I AREA — 0 I I 1�00� 1��51 G N B OAf�I NG REQ. 18' TDB _ !8' TDB 41 - 0"x 30'-G" I 5 1'- 0 x 35-G w 5 I -0"x 35-G I 41 - 0 x 30'-G" REV. OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 1-- OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW ( TOP CHORD = 30 - PSF LIVE LOAD — Q ILn > TOP CHORD = 8 - PSF DEAD LOAD REV I I Q I I BOT CHORD = 5 - PSF DEAD LOAD TOTAL LOAD= 43-P5F R� ! G' TDB o 1 6' TDB I A1'�'IC 5�'OI�AG� 1��51GN L-OA1�1 NG REV. I � J I LU �? I TOP CHORD = GO - PSF LIVE LOAD REV w I I TOP CHORD = 10 - P5F DEAD LOAD REV 1 TSB ° 14 TDB I TOTAL LOAD = 70 - PSF I � I C) Q D n I I Q D o � D � I WIMP PF-SIGN L-OAPING REV. in �r) 03 � Q T) in in in cp 00 Ln �� REV. I N N m m N N 1 2 TDB �� 1 2' TDB N m m m N N I ! 20 - MPH WIND - SPEED LOAD r D o �, � n to n D 0 n n FOR�ILLIAM A CKE'RMANN �_ — _ - - _ __ - - - - - - - a a c� o o a ca a a n o - -- - - _ _ - - � in n �r a� in in - - %c in co 00 11 in NOTE: L- I G N�1"I--t O U I_-AI�I N N m m m m N N "t — "1 -- `v N N m m m m N N I THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO ADDRESS: '� '� n r, r, n n CONFORM TO THE IRC 2009 BUILDING CODE.. ;� � rw AffIC FI,OO1� F1,AN 1 / 81 1 _ 1 1 -011 NEW YORK EDITION. BUILDING ( � � � /��\1141\" WI NI�OW & fi�001� SCN�1�U�� C U�C"CNOG UF_ , NY 119� 5YM. TYPE OF WINDOW/ DOOR MODEL# R.O. JAMB WIDTH HARDWARE GLAZING QTY. PROJECT: KISTLER CONSTRUCTED SPLIT SLIDING DOOR w/ 11 COMBO TRACK 51 'x 91'x 14' FQUIPMF f 5TOMF & 51'X 20'y, 22' 2Nn 0 4040 PICTURE WINDOW IN EACH PANEL w/ PRE- 14x14 I3-5 x Q�/411 * NATIONAL N/A 2 PAINTED STEEL SIDING PANELS � X BUCK TRIM SLIDER 13'- 10" HARDWARE FLOOD ApFA & C 2) 4I 'x �0' -6 14' WOPK5HOP COLONIAL INSULATED STEEL OVERHEAD DOOR w/ COMMERCIAL ""'" - DRAWING TITLES: 2 COMMERCIAL TORSION SPRING HARDWARE I.C.P. 12'-4" 812 TORSION SPRINGS N/A G I,`il I!, (�.�) BAKED ENAMEL FINISH $ INTERIOR LOCKS � THERMA-TRU 3 „ TEMPERED � " OCT 21 2016 IL-11 l 3 1 3068 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/ 2G2HD 38/8"x 0/1 LEVERED INSULATED 2 _••m �_ . y. I �L JJ 4 6 CHECKED I SCALE: AS SHOWN i?C� 9/ 612016 9-LITE HALF GLASS COLONIAL PANELS IN LEFT 8?�2LOCKSET HALF GLASS I ,t. �' ! BY: 3068 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/ THERMA-TRU 383/8'x LEVERED TEMPERED m ". DATE: 08/ 29/ 2016 APPROVED JP3 9/ -7/ 2016 DRAWN BY: pC� / Jsb FIELD REP. MICHA�I_ COCCO O 9-LITE HALF GLASS * COLONIAL PANELS 2G2HD 821 4911 6 LOCKSET INSULATED 3 .. ••^ ._.-+• ,•'-�v...w IN RIGHT HALF GLASS 51MONTON VINYL SINGLE HUNG THERMAL DRAWING NO. SHEET OF O WINDOWS w/ INSECT SCREENS * SIMONTON 36"x48" 1211 STANDARD PANE DOUBLE I G ---�•�" K--7-48620 I 5 GRILLES 3040 SHW GLAZED APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL 9/7/2016 NOTE: ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS MUST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND 120 MPH WIND SPEED, AS WELL AS WIND BORNE OBJECTS. ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: 9 6 2016 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL ` ROOFING PANELS - (3 P-3" RUN) ROOFING PANELS - (27-9'I RUN) ROOFING PANELS - (25'-G" RUN) i II I I' I: I i -- - ---- -- -- -- ----------------27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL Excellence Integrity Distinction I I I I ROOFING PANELS - (2 -G RUN) Ii II I it I it I I I ii I I i i I I I'll' i I lIii1 i I II rIiII iI !I: I II I I I II II I I I i ! I �. P.O. Box 395 Fo elsville PA. 18051 i I i I I i I I i I I I I I I it I I it I Ii rl i II 'I ii III iI�'' I 11IIIlI'IeiI P0I!III III II i III !I. IIIi i Ii III III I I1I'i'11 i III I III II iIiII it iI II II II IIII I:I IIII III I III ER (547-8537) PHONE: 1 800 KISTL E MAIL. info � kistlerbu'ldin9s.comMEMBER SINCE I I II i I i i I li I I II i I i I I I II I I Ili I' I G I I i it I I I I I I I Q II it i I i ! I I I i II I'I f I! I li i I 'i f I li I I II I I I II I i I I i I � 3198 WEB SITE www.KistlerBuildings.com W I' I I iI II I II I I I Q i I I III i I I I I I D_ D II i I i i� I I I I i! I I W I I I h I'I i �S i i I i 1 I i I i I I •I I i ! � { I i � I I : : I : I I � „ I I I „ II i I a . x Ia �.- I I 'C... 1 I I II I � d I I I 1 �- 1 I I I - f I I I I I 1 I P a I I I I I I I I I I =� II I O LI I ! I I I I I I I I I. r, I II I I i I I I I r it f I I E I I : t II I I i I I li I I I i I 1 ll F� I I 'll I t`t I i I r i I' 't: !' I I: I li I 11 I i I I I �'L i' I I i >r I I I I I >1 I: I E�il �II I f �. i I i r. ; II I I � I II, I i I i I i N I U I: II 11 I I �r I y, ��=o 1 I I I' I I ..In11 .r \3 R 'f p xa tL0 P U ^ 7 No �M I I I I I. k j — i I I: ,• I I i I ( II: f a f I' I I E i I i�l f I I I I LI. i I I r !, I I "a1 I ! I i li i I I Q ' i I I € I r I II O I' I I I i- .I• is 11, i i I I :k I' Ii — iIIIju III IiiI®III IinI'rII'I! I!IIIIIi®IEIIIi iIiIIIIIi IIiIIji:I'i IIIIIIii!I,II,IIIII'Ii'iII 'IiI II'I IiIiII I r:li IIi IIII IIiIIiI(liII I II IiIII•11tiilII.i' i:I III I'IfIii1fiIIIIiillE !IIiIIIIi 'Ii:IIII III uI:ItI1,II1II1 i IiiiIIIi' IiIIIIIl !iiiiIIIjliIl'I'I IIIIIIIlI•f rrIrII.:iIr'. ItI.Ir�iiiII°'I`i•Sf.II11II IIIII'llII bi!IiliIIIiEl�'iiiI,;1,3!,'II'II'IIIE`'i IIIIIIII I'II1'I1 IIi'IlIlIIIiIII iIiI� IifIIf! II bII!a,•,II 'iIIIii IjI rI1i(II:,iIiII iI,i'{;ll;IEIIi•.I3'tI!1i3 tIIEi€€I`!IllIIE! �IlII'I:Ii'iiiIII:�iI:II.I il ElI;1IIa: IIiai:sIIIi 'I 1IIIiiIIiiII IIiiI IIIIIiIiIIiIIII III !'iIiIIiI �rIII1�I Iii iiiI'•i iIIIIIII !I EkIEsII,^E1I,l3lIEs I' IiIIIII 1II!IiIiIII1III iIiiI IIII IIi'I!IlI1 IiI1IIIiIIIiI'I1 f{,lI�I II'If IIII!rIidiiIii14•kFkk�kI1 i(•Ir''I,III....'' II(f II IiIIiIiI e IIii'IiIIII ' ®:Ii lIIII iIIiiI lIIIiIiIIIj IIIjILiI ill lil 'EIIf (�I II i®II'III II�II:'iIII IIIllI'III!I (III ''III IiIiI(!iII (I °'I i�'IiIII1IIIIIIIiiifilI :I i1 III!ItIIII!ii!,!E raji liiIIIIIli •e•i : UQz--C—W.IIIII (i9 -i IIIII:II I((III II.II -iIiir'IiiiI II lII IiII II lIiI i II I'IIIIIiIIiiiI ii II IitIIiIIIII I! I'iII I III I'I'IrIII' I',:III:III: i,'111IIII 3y;•,3 ,I'IIE IIi: IiiIItI:'iIII III IEIIr"1lII li IIIIi 1 IIiI IIII I!)I II'IIIIIIiIIIIi! I ..s I II iGI'I 'I III I1,'IIIiIIr III - iIII� , —.!iI:IIiII I Ii _II iiIiIIff iII.I t l'`I,;i1iiII I, I(iIII I�'l liI'III1•�I: I '�,Ii iIIir�Itt'I''I�„isrI!ii;•^:1( II iII1'IIII:I tItIf1.IIiIIIII: IIIIiI 1 III(IIi� i!IIIiiiiI IIIIIIIIII:IIII iiiIII III IIiIiIIIIiIIIIE I I( II' II III'I I:iIIIIIII'I:I I:'iIII I II1 !iII EiI1IIII iI' ii i I(1iil'II'III:I iIIiiIIII IiIrI � IIIlI II'I i IIi I•IIIII I1iIIj �III iI iiIIIrIl II!lIa I �III' II I'I'I'l l11!IIIiiIiiiiiiiI®I! i”;i'IiI)IIii1Ii ®®III :1iriII1I" I�I''I I,.I.iiIIIII It'IIIiI'I: ®IiIi IIII IfiiIIi ®III i!II,IiiiI)i IiI,Il'i' titI Ii IliI lIIIIIIIiIIIt iIi,'iII i IIII1III Ii IIIIIII1II ;;11TIii�IraIIIi!i..,!t1 liIIIII'IIii'I'1iI Ii® II!IIIjili f'. IjI'I rIiI ®II� IIiIIIIIIIi IriIli I i iiIIIIi IIII IIiiI:I I:(IIII tiII 1': iIiII(I �:I.IiIilI:'i:'IiIIlII'I `iiII IIIiI I I�iiI,illI'::I:i:I IitlIIiiII1ItIIIt i:lIiiI'1IlIlII IIiIIi�I�1IiIIiIIi IiIICiIiIfIuII c1I.t tIIIiIiIIi �I IIII iIiIiIIiiIIiII IIIIIIIi II IiiIiiIIIliII iII:I itIIi fiII,l II II:°iIii'III iIiI 'IItIIl SII I ITIi1i!i11lii II iIiI..I,i3iEr lIII'III'III'I III'I:I iit iIIiIIiIIIhiIliI I^;iIIiI?I�I'I: > I II'iIi I,IIii Ii IIIililri iti1 QI ii ii!lII, I .iiIIIIj III I IiIII iI!IIIIIIIIII r1Ii; Iil IiiIIIlIII •i;tiI 'I III i!1iIIIi :IIItIl!I -IiIiiijiiII IIII iII1IIIIIiiI lE I' III1II'III iI (II iiiIIiIIIIIII I 'I:iiIIiI II I I iiliI I I I aISi;EIIi '.II I iIIiI1I IIi I•li!ssi1IIl' iI IIl!'IIii Ir'Il rIliiIiI:i :iI{IiII 'iIiIIII1iIE,iEEIlIr3 IrIIIl'u II iI1II!l IiI iII iIIII III I!Ii1IiQU�QmN-0�— — �IiIIiI1 IiIII I''lI !IIIlIIII! �I !II 1IiI II I IIIIIE� Iii''IiJII•I III II :IiitII I II I IIiiIII IiI II iI!I,III I I I E QU—NZ- II'II I I,IIIII IIIIIIII I ;_a_iIiiIIII'I_ +Ii _iIiI ' III'I'iII'I iIIiiIIIIIIIi _— � aBPA: ^.1 J 5 D� EtM4' Iom-'•N�Ce. : ,tB� �•�eti^U1r19,' x.fi1 sl' fx4 l� '4 «Y: ^%xH 1<.0h8 I , F 4' � � �✓ t o \t7't � . k� .t r i'eG't4~ Ji .,AA�1,F P�r - Sm� E<�,a aE n DtZaI �rnR4 tI - � A bt� � s , W. � 02 »r �LL I ORE I m 92 � t• t w- � ' i) �P- ' Ov 1�$?ON�+:•n.'`�,' ,T euC�:,r0 a ` �`t 9�q gw.Dy� "'p<k I- � � MRx} .; E �.7�9ar 'e :BI +I 29MMA R9 # 2§ Rag R9 -27 0 O1 1S1NN � � �VA18 I Vi .T ry�y'ay% 4 t, p: �t IO`Lt1 �t t;4H -a� Ltwe Ir I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY 51GNATURE„a - EQ .> R Tt��.:a�S�A te; ` H^„, f�Er�,Y , T' ,MA, ,a �E T R:N „ T ; I PER50NALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE FL A : E> N D, R: ' AS , AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAWN CUSTOMER DATE ANY CHANGE5 HEREAFTER MU5T BE APPROVED IN WRITING. 12 12 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING 3 3 12 12 ANY CHANGE5, AND / OR C05T5 OF CHANGE5. B ILDINITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL.AND TRADE SECRET JU I DI TION TOWNOF50UT10 DINFORMATIONIS THE PROPEROF QSTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC.AND S GNEN TO THE IN CONFIDENCE THE RECNER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE COUNTY: SUFFOLK DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY BLOC # N/A LOT# NA KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. R WILL�1) NOT USE THE DRAWING OR MY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR USE GROUP: SI TRADE SE INFORMATION THERON• �2) NOT COPY THE CONST. TYPE: 5-B TNG OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TWE SECRET INFORMATION THERON•AND �4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEEDCZ AREA: 5 535 S . FTTNN THE DRAWING OR UPON DEMAND RENRN THE DRAW— II w I ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AD ALL MATERIAL COPIED I THEREFROM.TOTAL VOLUME I I6,120 CU. FT. W Qr i i L7 + I II I I 110 +I +I 1 1 _O1 1 �VA�' N 11 - 11 -011 JOE BoRCHITECTN0P-,-r I,L_F,VATI0N 1 / 81 50U1 P.O. 89 Greensburg, PA 15601 Phone:(406)551-0654 e-mail: •bleehash@ mail.com NY LICENSE N0. 030422 REV- 412 1/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLA5 t MOVED STAIR LOCATION. REV. 10/5/ 1 G ADDED STAIR DETAIL5 AND UPDATED ATTIC CONFIG . REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. I I REV. li REV. REV. W REV w LL_ FOR•� ADDRESS: O� L_ IGN "I ut!_:5� I—AN�A WIL LImoM A CKERMANNOU '.1 Ili]1111[J 1111 IN It 111111111111111111111 Ill [A111111111fliflill I f I E: o � N YI I �7 1 O I i ® U7 SITE:® OR ® ®® ® Wo z+I �QUIPM%f 5f0�1 51Ix 20fx 22E 2NP +I �I- � : _ •?1t__A-L�.,I��'yIw.___.__.I_L�_=:_.v_,....,�..I.._=i...;�.�..,} .u.r,�.�._,_t;.r'--_�.`{_j.r;..,.r,-'•.9'_�._.--.-.._'--_."..llI_Iis 4 I�FI-00P,I�O�As2) IIEx 3O£ 612EE � EW O;K5NOP F,A5-' 1, ,1,VA110N 1 / 8 11 1 i _011 DR �I_F_VA-"ION VIFIWS CHgEDCr9/ 6/ 2016AS SHOWN CHECKED APPROVED 08/ 29/ 2016 JP3 9/ -7/ 2016DCT 2 2015 DRAWN BY: FIELD REP. MICHAEL_ COCCO DRAWING N0. SHEET OF K-7-486 0 2 5 ARCHITECTURAL 9/7/2016 APPROVED ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: 9/6/2016 .� ,ita;;yt'r5�1::�,,#Txtri:::'.;:3^•. •�stii�irwatliEiw�;l�ii �a` ivam, CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP 5 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES AT 4-0o/c UI 2"x 4 WIND BRACING AS 2 x 4 PURLINS @ 24 olc TO BE NAILED FLAT REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER ± AGAINST TRUSS w/(3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL Excellence Integrity Distinction ROOFING PANELS - (27-9" RUN) P.O. Box 395 Fogelsville, PA. 18051 ` 51MP50N H 10 OR PHONE: 1 -800—KISTLER (547-8537) EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP MEMBER SINCE E—MAIL: info@kistlerbuildings.com 2"x G" CONTINUOUS 1983 WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildings.com (2) 2"x 12" 24 1 POf-2.OE MSR FASCIA BOARD ,....< <.•.... CONTINUOUS SUPPORT TRUSS EAVE OVERHANG STAIR CRITERIA L L,4 PLYWOOD O NONE SIDE j EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT LOWER RUN: �. }. a II a. r_ Q 5 a e�(y (I O) RISERS AT 7/ EACH 6 4Y TOTAL RISE OF WALL SE ABATING 20 a 4 u 3 V jai s':,. 9 TREADS AT 10 EACH 8 6 TOTAL RUN WIDE DRIVE THROUGH FROMlid v ( ) /4 . a ^i a. THE ADJACENT AREAS 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL UPPER RUN: ah SIDING PANELS -TYPICAL 5 _ _ (I 4) RISERS AT 7/8 EACH 8 103/4 TOTAL RISE z , ;:,;.. A�• a I� u a•a` Ph y tet:Alva'sLn ' u® (1 3) TREADS AT 10" EACH - 1 1'-03/4"TOTAL RUN + c ,nN C +I `� �� e 1935 1 av PRE-ENGINEERED GPI-G5 1 1-7/8 I-JOISTS @ a;;<, ,d Y`ttsc�auRar ' j' Njkb jcF-yk <;�. 1- Lana fs&*ivl San A4:'S' .y.•^,°``',w-.,< I G /0/c- TYPICAL W PLYWOOD DECKING / 4 I 0 TREADS .;, i `��'•" aY'91Witle � �,. ,� '`6y�• ,1`?a, ssau - 2 x 6 TOP RAIL w/ IBC/ IRC APPROVED HANDRAIL � `�---- " w �" :`G•^�noreRExesc ,� ca. .a'.. `t{,. .�" .r r � ,��. .}„�.: ^4��:.':`.::c,+.i°�;;:;:. 1�, __ _.•Naw ik � , ~': 1` 5-1/4"x 117/8u 5 I/4 x 117/8 �a.�" = �.�� 4` ,� ry� Y�` ,� _>�� W, ,. 1— °`bra ,w.. v�'ti.•~�:�, � � �`°� GLU-LAM BEAM GLU LAM BEAM ` i'Malra%a: a Y t<` .` nth\;,,'^ :e�. .. (n 2• =•."� IVa ^:':�:�5:., a,: z z W ' z a: � a LLJ 5.. -' calker .; I c>7 >. O E- O ., Q O v : LU I 4:SR �:`���^ �] .Y .. l � m;k": .o.'�-. :... .,,\.:.'. y;*":�ti 1'� island - �} oC c� 3-PLY 2xG GLU 0 J/ :: LAMINATED COLUMN j ? +I STAIR CRITERIA LOWER RUN: O 2"x 2" S.Y.P. SPINDLES SPACED SO THAT I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY 51GNATURE THAT I (1 0) RISERS AT 75/8" EACH - G'-4%4' TOTAL RISE A 4" SPHERE CANNOT PASS THROUGH PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PLANS, (9) TREADS AT 10" EACH - 8'-G3/4" TOTAL RUN AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS DRAWN N UPPER RUN: `n A (14) RISERS AT 75/8" EACH - 8'-103/4" TOTAL RISE PRE-FABRICATED CU5TOMER DATE STAIRS w/ RAILINGS 4" (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORCED (1 3) TREADS AT 10" EACH - 1 1'-03/4" TOTAL RUN 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. CONCRETE FLOOR n THROUGHOUT SPLASH BOARD .. ,....:... : . :.:. ..• .:.•.,.•.....:.. .. .. ........ •.: .:; .•..:.,,:•:•.. .... ..: , . •..... . w ...1.... .. ....:...... . ... r•. . ... •. ... .....• .,, . :. :. ,.,. ...:... . .:...•,,. ... •- • . . :.... . ..: : ••. . .; : •. •. : r.,• .• : .: ..-• • .:•. ... ---- --- --- �, ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING. : ^~ '` ' _ S�'AI I? CONS IGU�A�'ION �� q I I _ I 1 _01 I PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING I ESTAB. 4" CRUSHED STONE BASE GRADE CONCRETE COLLAR ANY Cf IANGES, AND / OR COSTS OF CHANGES. 30" SQUARE x 24" DEEP CONCRETE COLLAR 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN BUILDING � SITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET CONCRETE POST BASE STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF KISTIER POLE BUILDING 29SQUARE CONCRETE 29' ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CO., INC. AND IS GNU TO THE RECOVER IN CONFIDENCE FOOTING PAD - SEE PLAN THE RECOVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE _FOR 51ZE AND LOCATIONS _ �— _ — _ -_ _ T5 P-0" OUT/OUT POSTS SQUARE CONCRETE COUNTY: SUFFOLK DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND FOOTING PAD - SEE PLAN AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ' FOR SIZE AND LOCATIONS BLOCK# N/A LOT# N/A KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE DRAWING OROR E-21 1 C,5, 5F_C-r101 V Af PPI VF- 'I'1-II�OUGN 1 / 4 I I _ I I _O I I USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADES CRETTIINFORMATIONCOPYEOF THERON; (2) NOT COR THED OPPYY THE DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS ENHER THE DRAW- CONST. TYPE: 5-13 ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THEREIN;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE- TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,120 CU. FT. THEREFROM. Pa CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP In M --- — ------�` CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP JOE BLEEHASH, ARCHITECT P.O. Box 892 211x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT Greensburg, PA 15601 4 1'-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH Phone:(406)551-0654 AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS e-mail: •bleehashOa mail.com NY LICENSE N0., 030422 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± olc TO BE NAILED FLAT REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER r 5 P-O" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH REV- 4/2 1/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLAS t MOVED STAIR LOCATION. AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS r REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER 12 ,,-- ` 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL REV- 10/5/ 1 G ADDED STAIR DETAILS AND UPDATED ATTIC CONNG. 2 �`f � - 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL 7 ROOFING PANELS - (25'-G" RUN)� Rte• ROOFING PANELS - (3 I'-3" RUN) i ' 12 REV �,. 12 REV. �7 REV. � r SIMPSON H 10 OR EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP REV. SIMPSON H 10 OR \/' j.I j•'I r EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP 8 2"x G" CONTINUOUS REV. ''j.'I I••I ±8'-0" o/c WIND BRACING (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE MSR FASCIA BOARD •• 2"x G" CONTINUOUS SEE TRUSS DRAWING FOR CONTINUOUS SUPPORT TRUSS SAVE OVERHANG REV. ±8'-0" o/c WIND BRACING (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE MSR FASCIA BOARD SPACING REQUIREMENTS EXTENSION w/ ALUM. SOFFIT SEE TRUSS DRAWING FOR CONTINUOUS SUPPORT TRUSS SAVE OVERHANG ---------------- REV. EXTENSION w/ALUM. SOFFIT Q SPACING REQUIREMENTS � a_ 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL REV. Q N SIDING PANELS -TYPICAL � 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL SIDING PANELS -TYPICAL REV' 0 FOR 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- -ILLIAM A CKE'RMANN 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- w -� O o LAMINATED COLUMN 1- I- LAMINATED COLUMN z z N 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 24"± o/c ADDRESS: p 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 24"± o/c v +I N Y 11 7 1 +I1 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT ' FOR WAINSCOT 2"x G" SYP #I LAP GIRT 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL SITE:BUILDING FOR WAINSCOT o a WAINSCOT PANELS - TYPICAL a n W I O" TREATED CONT. C U_r("CNOG U� 1 NY I I W GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL SPLASH BOARD a 4" (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORCED o WAINSCOT PANELS - TYPICAL CONCRETE FLOOR THROUGHOUT „ '0 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. PROJECT: 4 (3,500 PSI) RE-INFOKCED TI .••.r •• :..< .... :.. ••: .:. :• •.,...•.• . ..::.:. .•.-�.•..:,.: •.. ., :. ••: ESTAB. CONCRETE FLOOR THROUGHOUT BOARD 4" CRUBAS X X X X SPLASH ..• .... •: :•. :.......'••• .. .. .... •• ... :•.. . : .•. .. . .,:.:. •. .•.•. : •. •.... ..;•.. ... •: ••.::•,•_ : . .; :.. • .- ESTAB. 30" SQUARE x 24" DEEP SHED ONE B SE. GRADE & 51 20 22 2Nn GRADE = #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA FLOOD AC A & 2) -`1 'X 301 `611 14' WOPK5HOP 4" CRUSHED STONE BASE O CONCRETE COLLAR COLUMN AT CONCRETE DEEP CONCRETE COLLAR w/#5 #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN COLLAR ELEVATION o REBAR THROUGH PERMA-COLUMN COLUMN AT CONCRETE 2 I CONCRETE POST BASE DRAWING TITLES: d 6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN COLLAR ELEVATION CONCRETE FOOTING PAD 2 I' STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT CONCRETE POST BASE 8_ SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. C ISO �� Cfil O N 2 I' 2 1. STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT LOCATIONS 4 1'-0" OUT/OUT POSTS CONCRETE FOOTING PAD SQUARE CONCRETE FOOTING ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND '�— PAD - SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND - -------- ---------------------------------....--'----._..._._..--------'---'-----'------'------------------....------....------------------------ LOCATIONS 5 I -0 OUT/OUT POSTS CONCRETE FOOTING PAD LOCATIONS SCALE: A5 5HOWN CHECKED PCF- 9/ 6/ 2016 __-_—__ --- ------ - � SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND BY. ' LOCATIONS GGJ G ^ I _.,. __� ..-. DATE: O8/ 29/ ZOI G APPROVED J�'6 9/ 1 C,5,1 J�C�101 V I / I I _ 1 1 _O 1 I ;,1l BY ' DRAWN BY: FCr / ,��j12 FIELD REP. MICHAEL_ COCCO .r- 1 C 1�, SSC i ION 1 / 4 11 _ 1 1 _01 i L `_A'.:.....__.:----._...__. . - ' DRAWING N0. SHEET OF µ w OCT 21 K-7-x-860 3 5 i t 1 ARCHITECTURAL 9 7 2016 y �� ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: 9/6/2016 4 P-O" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES CONTINUOUS VENTED RIDGE CAP o/c w/ (3) 3 R.S. GUN NAILS PER CONNECTION AT 4'-0" olc w/ 2"x 4" WIND BRACING AS 2T-9" STEEL ROOF RUN TRUSS w/ 2 A. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS ��I ',"yn'` ''' REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER @x 4 PURLINS 24 3 I'-3" STEEL ROOF RUN 5 P-0" CLEAR SPAN PRE ENGINEERED TRUSSES 25'-6" STEEL ROOF RIJN II II II II II AT 4'-0" o/c w/ 2 x 4 WIND BRACING AS 2 x 4 PURLINS @ 24 ± o/c TO BE NAILED FLAT PT90 REQUIRED BY TRUSS ENGINEER AGAINST TRUSS w/ (3) 12d. R.S. GUN NAILS EACH ®� 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS 12 2"x 6" FLASHING NAILER I I Excellence Integrity Distinction , 7 2"x G" BOTTOM CHORD TRUSS OVERHANG P.O. Box 395 Fogelsvllle, PA. 18051 EXTENSION w/VENTED ALUMINUM SOFFIT •'• 2"x 6" CONTINUOUS TRUSS @ 4'-0" o/c PHONE: 1 -800—KISTLER (547-8537) FASCIA BOARDMEMBER SINCE E—MAIL: info@kistlerbulldings.com TYPICAL TRUSS SIMPSON H I O OR EQUAL HURRICANE CLIP �983 WEB SITE: WWW.KIStIerBUIldIngS.COn'1 I @ 4'-0" olc o Y 3-PLY 2"x 6"x 25" �•.,„1 .d ft it x • Qi v`s :�.. - t TIE DOWN BLOCK ,�:a•. •; ' I v � i n' Ytt'' M• 7 75 0 NAILS TYP. • 2 d RS •o. v. �: F'q, r' `� ,�.. tea,.;. „, I 11 II O :tea, it`. ' '"i t3"- : . R '^''"c\.>�•w:,}t'I � 2 x 6 FASCIA w ALUMINUM COVE 101 101 O 1 I I 1 1 o f I 1 II 1 1 I / 1 I I ° I Iof I I I IoI I I • y `� Alv9hsLy (2) 2ux 12n 2400E-2.OE CONTINUOUS SUPPORTS me,NY41 ,. 1.. lLl • i ung 131 tau �a A"� ".J, iekct F aiC.' \ \ I.I I•I I••I u u o o " " «1.+,. m .•. �';:. i ,'m`r' (5) 20d RS NAILS TYP. 2 x 6 (RIP TO 5/ ) BEARING BLOCK AT " ' i " ": „ 4 2 x 6 RIP TO 5/ x I 114" 2 x 6 CONTINUOUS � •~ �k ( 4) 'i.4•�.... ,..a,�'atalttl,� 'f? :>r'',pe,.! ��,E �:,..,..., M,dBsala`PAin'j' FASCIA BOARD K � �.. ' EACH POST AND TIE DOWN BLOC �>�•� R BEARING BLOCK(BEYOND) 6, i- O 6 20d R.S. NAILS AT ( _ 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 24"± olc EACH POST/T.D.B. I' „A `t " 1tnCk.' 0\,ti ,Z.. �a,„.,,.$,.. ""i'"ag-tk_�dil',R? ''.: '-'°..`t•t -� , 3-PLY 2"x 6 GLU LAMINATED COLUMN : in ". l 1 l / tas •. . as N I 3-PLY 2N 6II GLU 25 .?� "�' • \ �` 3 1' :: .. � LAMINATED COLUMN 3-PLY 2`x 6 GLU- LAMINATED L'� %�iui CLI w FRAMED FRAMED FRAMED 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL " 2"x6SY #IHEADR COLUMN 81o cv;• TYPICAL OPENING OPENING SIDING PANELS .. : ' t! F Z hand � I FOR 3040 FOR 3040 FOR 3040 2n x 4I GI TS 24 _ o c ti � I, WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW I �. .. .:..... .::. ..: �i F. O. FOR F. O. FOR 3068 3068 2"x 6" SYP #I LAP GIRT TICAL F_AV� Ff�AMI NG & -MU55 -'O 5UPPOPl- L INS CONNECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I ENTRY ENTRY FOR WAINSCOT PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THESE PLANS, DOOR DOOR �� L} I I — I ' —OI 1 AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS DRAWN ° 2"x 10" TREATED CONT. SPLASH BOARD COSTUMER DATE - #5 RE-BAR THROUGH PERMA COLUMN ESTAB.� � � �- AT CONCRETE COLLAR ELEVATION GRADE — 24" DEEP CONC. ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING. C? COLLAR- TYPICAL -6300 SERIES PERMA COLUMN 2"x 4" PURLINS @ 24" ± o/c w/ (3) 3" R.S. GUN NAILS PER CONNECTION CONCRETE POST BASE @TRUSS w/ 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS I I ( ( PLEA5E CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING OR COSTS OF CHANGES. 21' 2 I' 25' 29' 29' 25' 23' 2 1' 21 STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT ANY CHANGES, AND / ANGLE BRACKETS -TYP. 8"-DEEP X 20"@CONCRETE FOOTING PAD 12 BUILDING � 51TE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET - SEE '`-�� TRUSS@ 4'-0" o/c 5"-DEEP X 30 0 CONCRETE ~- Q 3 JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF M10 POLE BUILDING CONCRETE PAD PAD - TYPICAL PLAN FOR SIZES AND LOCATIONS ^- CO., INC.AND S GIVEN TO THE RECOVER IN CONFIDENCE UNLESS NOTED 2"x G" BOTTOM CHORD TRUSS OVERHANG COUNTY: SUFFOLK THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE OTHERWISE TYPICAL TRUSS '' - EXTENSION w/VENTED ALUMINUM SOFFIT DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRMNG BY @ 4'-0" olc 3-PLY 2"x 6"x 2222' BLOCK# N/A LOT# N/A KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL({) NOT USE THE 5'-0" 8'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 4'-3" 4'-311 _ 51-0" • 4 1'-0"-OUT/OUT POSTS 10 TIE DOWN BLOCK DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR -- --- ERON; 5 I�0 OUT/OUT POSTS - TRADE SECRET INFORMATION O OTHER (2 NOT COPY THE -----_.....------...._.....................----.......------..._.__..____....._._.._...--.-----_---.- _ -- I I ---------- ---------- � 2"x 6" FASCIA w/ALUMINUM COVER DRAWING;�E) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EITHER THE DRAW- USE GROUP: S I (5) 20d RS NAILS TYP. - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ CONST. TYPE: 5-B ING OR CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION - �` ° ° THERON;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE N®TO RE- 4'-O" ON CENTER IIII°I 1 1 1 101 TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. FT. TNN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- ---------------------------------- I I 101 1 1 101 11 (3) 12d RING SHANK GUN NAILS PER ° ING, Ali COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED IIII°I IIII°I I loll I I°III TOTAL VOLUME: 116,120 CU. FT. THEREFROM. - TYPICAL 2"x 4" PURLIN AT 24" o/c w (2) 2"x 12" 2400E-2.OE CONTINUOUS SUPPORTS ° CONNECTION TO TRUSS - PRE-PAINTED STEEL DENVER I 'lowGABLE RAKE TRIM (5) 20d RS NAILS TYP. 2"x G" (RIP TO 5/4") BEARING BLOCK AT ° 211x G" (RIP TO 5/4")x I 1/4' ' 0 EACH POST AND TIE DOWN BLOCK BEARING BLOCK(BEYOND) ! 2"x 4" S.P.F. GIRTS @ - 2"x 6" S.P.F. END RAKE WITH ALUMINUM O (3) 3" GUN NAILS PER CONNECTION 24" ± o/c FASCIA COVER (NAIL TO EDGES OF ~ (6) 20d R.S. NAILS AT 27 GA. PRE- PAINTED STEEL 2"x 4" GIRTS @ 24"± o/c EACH POST/T.D.B. 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL ROOFING PANELS -TYPICAL PURLINS w/ PAIRS OF 16d NAILS) m SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL 12" SOLID ALUMINUM SOFFIT PANELS Lpgz_-Uzz3q= NJ j 2"x I I Z " A.F.L SLIDING -' 2"x 4" PURLINS AT 24" o/c DOOR HEADER SLIDING DOOR TRACK PAINTED STEEL F-J-CHANNEL SITZ AT N ( 3-PLY 2"x G" GLU- LAMINATED COLUMN @ 8' olc GABLE END TRUSS SIDING TO SOFFIT TRANSITION JOE BLEEHASH, ARCHITECT AND METAL COVER 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL I P.O. Box 892 SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL I. II Greensburg, PA 15601 3-PLY 2 x 6 GLU- LAMINATED _ 2"x 8" TRACK FILLER AT DOOR COLUMN @ 8' olc 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL e-mail: ma5 com NY LICENSE N0. 030422 OPENING - USE 2"x 6" ADJACENT SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL 3 PLY 2"x G" GLU-LAM I TO DOOR OPENING TICAL GA13L� OV�I�NANG 1T_111111� REV. 4/2 1/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. DOOR COLUMN BEYOND I /� TYPICAL TRUSS AT 4'-011 o/c / rLA�' f�Uf"L I N5 I —0REV. 10/5/ 1 G ADDED STAIR DETAILS AND UPDATED ATTIC CONFIT. �— 2"x 4" GIRT FILLER w/ 2"x 4° PAINTED CASING - TYPICAL 2 rAVr- TAMING & -mU55 -'O 5Uf�f�Op-' L I N� CONNECTION Al' 2NP FL00P REV. I 14II � I 1 _011 TYPICAL SLIDING DOOR PANEL Rte' TYP 15-V I NG POOP NF_API�p 2"x 4" GIRT FILLER REV. 1 __ 1 _0111 _0II --- 2N G" DOOR LINER SING REV. ��-I'A)I� 2"x 10" TREATED SPLASH REV. -- BOARD (BEYOND) 4 3-" 3500 PSI CONCRETE FLOOR WITH 6x610/a a� WELDED WIRE FABRIC THROUGHOUT AISLE 3-ply 2"x G" S.Y.P. #I GLU- LAMINATED COLUMN — I 2"x G" S.Y.P. #I GLU- LAMINATED COLUMN REV. ��-• / ,�. I I ` I i _OI I 2"x 6" TREATED RUB BOARD � 3-ply ADJACENT TO DOOR OPENINGS - :''''; -'v- REV ESTAB. ' �• 112" DIAMETER A325 THROUGH BOLTS IN ,.. ' DOUBLE SHEAR WITH HEX NUTS /2" DIAMETER A325 THROUGH BOLTS IN REV. GRADE , ;1`- �;.: 's':' 6 MIL. POLYETHELENE DOUBLE SHEAR WITH HEX NUTS TORQUED TORQUED TO I I 0 FT-LBS, *4" O x 3s/8' II s II VAPOR BARRIER TO 110 FT-LBS, */4 0 x 3/8 FASTEN REV. FASTEN MASTER LEDGER LOK SCREWS + 4" CRUSHED STONE BASE • `� MASTER LEDGER LOK SCREWS INSTALLED 6300 2"x G" GLU LAMINATED 2"x G"TREATED POST I I ;`:'. INSTALLED FROM EACH SIDE. f r5'_ FROM EACH SIDE. LINER PRE-ATTACHED TO TYPICAL 6300 SERIES PERMA-COLUMN (BEYOND) , £:,4 REV. S.Y.P. #I COLUMN - TYP. I �L1 -011 - PRE-ENGINEERED REINFORCED 6300 .` 630042"x 6" POST (RIP IMf�AC-I' BOO f� A�' SLIDING I�DOf? �� �I I I _ I 1 -01 I I'`- SERIES PERMA-COLUMN CONCRETE BASE �� — PRE-ENGINEERED REINFORCED 6300 FOR: 'I +c. SERIES PERMA-COLUMN CONCRETE BASE WILLIAM A CKZR.MANN ESTAB. :::' • ...,; . ,•;:, �. ::'..� -:.. ESTAB. :.•�:r ...,;.•:. GRADE ,:':' ::. .. £� .'.''%`•:' :.• ..•,.: ' ADDRESS: I ;.;'�:'• i. y;:••:: j - #5 REBAR THROUGH PERMA-COLUMN GRADE ; • '•.'£� .'.'' -a 3/4" PLYWOOD SPACER J '� ' ' POST BASE (3" MIN END DISTANCE) `'•' �j}:.;�':':;: #5 REBARTHROUGH PERMA-COLUMN 0 L IGl--111—fOLI�� L-�I�� �': "•.'. 2"x 4" S.P.F. GIRTS PRE-ATTACHED TO •';• ;� ':..: ;'': POST BASE (3" MIN END DISTANCE) `' DEEP CONCRETE COLLAR :.c ..` �' .:•::;':' Sv U T l--I O L N Y I I —7 1 @ I G" ± o/c 6300 2"x 6" POST r: ';: ->t:': �`�•` �: 24" - DEEP x 20" O CONCRETE ,.,•.:: :•{cL: • �• TYPICAL AT ALL POSTS _ ': j::•,-.: . 27 GA. PRE-PAINTED STEEL 0 •,•f.•::•' .•• :_:•� - .•: '•{fir• COLLAR- TYPICAL AT OPEN AREAS W. BUILDING SIDING PANELS - TYPICAL d '-'` '- (2) 2"x 2"x 9 GALVANIZED STEEL UPLIFT ;r SITE: I ]f AL V�� ' j (�/�N • 2"x " S.P.F. GI TS 24" ± EARTH BACK r� - (2) 2"x 2"x 9" GALVANIZED STEEL UPLIFT RESISTANT POST STABILIZER BRACKETS EARTH BACK ^fr"- • 2"x 4 S.P.F. DOOR 4 R @ olc FILL - TYPICAL =: i � '`" RESISTANT POST STABILIZER BRACKETS C U'! CHC? OF NY I I ATTACHED WITH/ O GRADE 2 BOLT IN FILL - TYPICAL =' Y GIRT FILLER 1/2" x 4" ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT ;�,•; DOUBLE SHEAR ATTACHED WITH/2" O GRADE 2 BOLT IN DOUBLE SHEAR PROJECT: AT ALL CONTACT POINTS BETWEEN :;:';� ;r• ;;,;,: ,:., .: T�''�:' ...•:. ::•= TYPICAL 3000 PSI CONCRETE TYPICAL 3000 PSI CONCRETE 5I 'K 91 'x 14 �QUIFM%f 5TRA6� & 51 x 20'x 22 2W PC-6300 PRE-CAST FRAMING AND CONCRETE FLOOR - FOOTING PAD (MIN. 8" THICK- y. -- -- • • •`'• FOOTING PAD (MIN. 8" THICK x CONCRETE BASE 4" (3,500 PSI) RE-INFORCED CONCRETE SEE PLAN FOR SIZES) 20" DIAMETER) FLOO? AREA & ( 2) 41 'X O' -6 14' WOM5HOP AS CONSTRUCTED FLOOR THROUGHOUT ALL AREAS It BY PERMA-COLUMN 2"x 10" TREATED --- -� I I 8 �• } CONT. :t,.:. " �`:. .•' .:•. .:a• .•'':-.`: : •; EE PLAN FOR SIZES _ 20O HOLE _ ' DRAWING TITLES: 3'-2311 :` r:S �•: :SPLASH BOARD (BEYOND) (�IF PAM I NG L 3L FOOTINGESTAB. AV � VV,L - �U55 51JPP0:T ['05T2"x IO" CONT. TREATED ICAL GAp05� SPLASH BOARD GRADE L- \.---G MIL. POLYETHELENE G 1 1 1 1 O 1 11 -011 SCALE: A5 SHOWN CHECKED IpC� 9/ 6/ 2016 (3) S.S. DRIVE ANCHORS AT I I I I I I VAPOR BARRIER SOOTING 1��TAIL 1 / 2 I _O 1��TAIL 1 / 2 I DATE: 08/ 29/ 2016 APPROVED JI�I3 9/ �/ 2016 PERMA COLUMN BASE + 411 CRUSHED STONE BASE .. _,..' ...11 '..,...'''' BY: �- - TYPICAL COLUMN DRAWN BY: 1?C� / �J�jn FIELD REP. MICHArL- COCCO �ICAI, MAN POOP Nt AMING -` F 3 V DRAWING NO. SHEET OF 1 1 _ 1 -011 ICA, CONCI,,F_� FL-OO -rAIL- 3� 4I I _ I _OI I i f ocT 2 : 2��5 K y.-•L I _,...�..:..-.. T. ...�.,...._..._f I \_-7 -18 6 ^{862 0 4 5 /l..J) `'''^`'J.•'W ' ' //�� ARCHITECTURAL 9 7 206 ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY. 9/6 2016 S,i'.:�•:},. M1�:'ti�":q.� :"41,�"a'R�?uyu tip:, ;YI r"Z01 70 7E /-,_1E 7-FR-7 --------- ---------- --'-___--_— -----_---- -----_____ _--____—_— _—____--__ ___--_____ ------- ------ ------- __—_-'—_—___ __.-_.._-.___— ------_---- ------ ------- ------ --_— ---------- __—__--_-- ---------- _____----- ---------- __--_—____ ---------_ I � 1 I d II Excellence * Integrity ''` Distinction a �aP.O. Box 395 Fogelsville, PA P . 18051 -f" I '— 0" P E>,ENGI N FRED C AR SPA 5 1 '- 0" E-ENGI EEREU', LEAP, 51-,\N h,` ' -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---{- -+--- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --, PHONE: 1 -800-KISTLER (547-8537) TRUS. ES @ 4' 0" o/c- PICAL TRU ES @ '-0" o/c- I I PICAL E-MAIL: info@kistlerbuildings.com 1 ' _ _ - -- ---- ---- -- ---- --- --- ---- -- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- --- ---- -----` I I MEMBER SINCE g ----- ---- I 19$3 WEB SITE: www.KistlerBuildings.com 1 1 h ( %d 1 1 4 I 0 PRE ENGINES ED CLE R SPAN „s. 1 RUSSE 4'-0 olc- TY I CAL — _ — I FAR LCL— --- — — -- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- ----- — --- A � a — 4.1_12 P@.E - — - -- — - -- - - - — - ` •� �� , ;r ``Qy AIvBF55 LYI e � \'.T 1 SES 4'-0" O/ PIC , ,�,- �- •� I "� °\ I ��. �� �— 1 f��,1 �: ,...*�}yr�.$�.., �'°t�@su Fazn��`'S'a'�.�45�P I ''". I 1 '�'�l.n'• :r Yom" }, k.'�ti.�'^ .,11� 1 �f i �e `x 9��`D{� ✓� ZS)�.. Zt':EY''D •e�, „.\,\,y.V. J vY�y�( .T r,�atarville '� ''� �� .?4�. q '��.4 Cut�roga'tr, 9S'`;.',3���y.. as •l ,l �. is.:`�. v.:S`"°�`+, 4 -ShaFa t19St � :} � � ,,.rm'. }.•. 9' �`�'�:' �' 't. �\`':'..;:;�.��. ° t : I I � C x '�• C I F"a ��rs �.� -'�ugo�x L �+4�"1-.�tRMC�I>'.� .it l;YY:`.r. '^�.,. ``�4.�y.Y"� {��'+,.•:'.,�:�._:'?+\��� `a$M1t .�,.: jln..gb. I ( _ I I I 1 i. 'a I 3 v�^ I I m�e I � tY 1 Via. baa I I nt I a ute atfOri k" � I r� s y I I I I 4S' a e'Q i" I I 1 � K 3 1 1 1 r d I t \C I 1 } I slan'd d�. I I I 1 u n ,F ` 1 I I €� `<�IC �N NIA '8.`'�`'�'\�` ' --- ---- -_�• ----- ----- ---- ---- - 1 -_._ _- --------�— ---- ----- ---I-- ---- ---- ---- •� ---- �-_—• - --- ---- -- 1 ---- ---- ---- --I--- ----- ---- --_--_---- -_- — ° I - ---- ---- ----- ----- �_- ---- --- 1 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE, WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDERSTAND THE5E PLANS AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED AS DRAWN 1 ' I CUSTOMER DATE --- .-� ANY CHANGES NEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING ANY CHANGES, AND / OR C05T5 OF CHANGES. BU I LD I N G SITE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF KISTLER POLE BUILDING 1 I I I I I I JURISDICTION: TOWN OF SOUTt10LD CO., INC.AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECOVER IN CONFIDENCE. I THE RECOVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE COUNTY: SUFFOLK DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY 1 i =-- -------- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- -- `� ---- - --- ---- - -- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- -------- --==- i i BLOCK# N/A LOT# N/A KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL 1 NOT USE THE ———— ————— ————— —— ` I I I I —— ————— ————— ———— DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE(CONFIDENTIAL OR ' I I I _ --� USE GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THERON• (2) NOT COPY THE L-- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ---{-- +- ----- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----__----- ---------- ERS - DRAWING, (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EITHER THE DRAW CONST. TYPE: 5-B ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET'INFORMATION THEREIN;AND (4) UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEED TO RE- TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. FT. THIN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- k+ i ; ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED 1 ------ ------ ------ I TOTAL VOLUME: I I G,1 20 CU. FT. THEREFROM. I 1 TP,U55 FPAMING, FLAN 1 / 8" — 1 1 -011 I JOE BLEEHASH, ARCHITECT P.O. Box 892 Greensburg, PA 15601 TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD Phone:(406)551-0654 2x4 #2 SPF WIND BRACES -''f— e-mail: •bleehash@ mail.com NY LICENSE N0. 030422 ROOF FRAMING LINE LEGEND TO BE NAILED FLAT AGAINST " TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD TRUSS BOTTOM CHORD w/ — 6— -- REV- 4/21/ IG ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. TRUSSES (3) 12d R.S. GUN NAILS EACH REV. 10/5/ 1 G ADDED STAIR DETAILS AND UPDATED ATTIC CONFIG. REV. - - - - - - - - - - 'Y' BRACING ° REV. ° DIAGONAL BRACING REV. --------------------------------------- OVERHANG LATERAL BRACE REV. - - - - RIDGE LINE 2x4 #2 SPF DIAGONAL BRACE o OVERLAP, TYP. 6�' REV IL TO BE NAILED FLAT AGAINST ° BOTTOM CHORD OF TRUSS w/ CORNER BRACING (3) 12d R.S. GUN NAILS EACH REV. -------------- LATERAL BRACING REV. PLAN VIFW c L,A� L3 P-,ACF N P L,AP P F-'AI L, REV. PLAN VIEW C PIA60NAL, r�r�AC� PF__-rA11, ) REV. FOR: WILLIAM A CKKRMANIV ROOF LINE ADDRESS: � 0� IGN'fi1-10L.1�� L /\N� TOP CHORD �O U�rl--1 Ol_ t� , N Y I I �–71 TRUSSES AT BUILDINGSITE: I � � �—\/,�1--1 ' � l_,�N Cul_C" NOGU� , NY 119� 2x4 WEB 2x4 BRACING PROJECT: 51 'x 91'x 14' �QUIPM�M'STO�� & 51 'x 20'x 22' 2Nn 2x4 "X" BRACE, FASTEN TO PI-OOT? APIA & C 2) -41 'y, �O' - 61, 1-4' WORKSHOP TRUSS W/ (2) 1 Gd NAILS DRAWING TITLES: 1-RU55 LAYOUT' & 131�ACINC PLAN CEILING LINE BOTTOM CHORD SCALE: A5 SHOWN CHECKED PCF 916/ 2016 BY: DATE: 08/ 29/ 2016 APPROVED Jl`l3 9/ -712016 ft '��//[,,�/ //� " X ' 'I \�/, I I �; , _ ! DRAWN BY: pC� / J5n FIELD REP. MICNA�� COCCO DRAWING N0. SHEET OF it OCT 2 1 2 I c016 K--7-4860 5 5 g .. ._-----. ARCHITECTURAL 7777016 2016 APPROVED ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY. 9/6/2016----A 20 TE-5T HOLE 25 STORM DRAINAGE GALL: BY: MCDONALD GEO5CIEWE 20 www.dignetnycli.com BOX 1000 SDUTTHOLD,N.Y. Ilml ZONING INFORMATION: �r ' 30 25 , of NEW YORK CITY or VOLUME = AREA x RAINFALL x COEFFICIENT 631-165-3611 AGRIGULTURAL GON5ERVATION 'A-G': FRONT YARD SETBACK;60' MIN DuakPand!'ofnf 3 www.call8l l.com PROPOSED BUILDING = 5,518 SQ.FT. DATE: JULY 16,2014 LOT AREA: SOp00 50.FT. MIN. EXISTING: WA - VACANT \ &LONG ISLAND (for other states) RAINFALL = 2"/HR = 0.161' -,RADE® 21.0' EXISTING: gW51b2 50.FT. (22.81AC) PROP05ED: 60.0' S� \ COEFFICIENT OF ROOF = I.0 GROUND LEVEL 0' PROPOSED: NO CHANGE a� 800-272-4480 811 MIXED SAND t LOAM 25 dJ j, Hie A ' STORM DRAINA6E SYSTEM 205' OS'BELOW GRADE 5IDE YARD SETBACK: 20' MIN oP ys��F c O ��., u (PROPOSED STRUCTURES ARE DEDIGATED TO LOT WIDTH; 175 FT MIN. EXISTING: WA - VACANT o�� EnstCutCho ue P° x37.5 1 1 Q,, 30 EXISTING: 602.63 FT PROPOSED: 228.8' o�p°r ROOF RUNOFF ONLY) By law,excavators and contractors working in the For safety reasons, homeowners are strongly BROW AND PALE five boroughs of New York Ci and Nassau and encouraged to call as well when planning an 1x42 S.F. X 0.167 X L0 = I,Ig3 GUFT. PROPOSED: NO GRANGE F 9 City 9 p 9 Y BROWN FINE TO 'S /✓o `� 9�es, Suffolk Counties on Long Island must contact type of digging on their property.Homeowners VOLUME REQUIRED = I,Ig3 GU.FT. 5IDE YARD SETBACK CUMULATIVE: q�L4 cute ue steace 6 MEDIUM SAND tis F I x215' s3� I / DigNet, 1-800-272-4480 or 811,at least 48 hours can contact us directly at 1-800-272-4480 or by USE: (gp) LOT DEPTH;250 FT MIN. 45' MIN Q I 1 but no more than 10 working days(excluding calling 811,the national call before you dig (3) 64P X 10' DP LEAGHING POOL EXI5TING: 185251 FT EXISTING: WA - VACANT �Oe N' weekends and legal holidays)priorto beginning number. For excavation work completed on VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,261 CUPT. PROP05ED: NO CHANGE 4 any mechanized digging or excavation work to personal property, it is the contractor's bb' 14.4'BELOW GRADE PROPOSED: 41q.8' ,1e QS ilk, I I J \ ensure underground lines are marked. responsibility--NOT the homeowner's-to contact NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: WATER IN PALE o Watervue �� F g >',• f LIVABLE FLOOR AREA: 850 S.F. : CROP �� LOGATIO �uteh• W) Excavators and contractors can also submit DigNet. Having utility lines marked prior to BROWN FINE TO REAR YARD SETBACK: 15 MIN tiara v q 'd' I locate requests online,through ITIC.If you do not digging is free of charge. DRAINAGE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED AT THE q g gg g g TIME OF GONSTRllGT10N NOTIFY THE TOWN MEDIUM SAND(5P) (S.F. PER DWELLING UNIT) EXI5TING: WA - VACANT = Ff.ar9Ne w PROP05ED: 610.8 : ,.3.;,. / y p ENGINEER PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. .4.0 11.0 BELOW GRADE PROPOSED: WA onA�re9 i WoKPlfLak may° Marsh Point , 0 � 1 I \� \ \ current) use ITIC, lease call 1-800-524-7603 for more information. ' 6ROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED I o I 2s, 14.4 BELOW SURFACE BUILDING HEIGHT 35 MAX. 35 �� EXISTING: WA - VACANT I INC I ExlSr I �, PROPOSED: 2-1.15' ,:,: � T�:.�_->��>� .�:!•.; _ - _ I ,open Field" Marratooka orad < � ;p � Y'` / "'I' \ M•Itituck - ! S FOR WORK IN THIS AREA. STORIES; 7: MAX. EXISTING: WA -VACANT .K,,no eve Polnt _,. 50 ,�, / ?� \ �6. SEE 'ENLARGED PLAN' - PROPOSED BUILDING PROP05ED: I AND V2 STY KEY MAP u /Q,, 25 .� fi Ib.Ox AND STORM DRAINAGE (THIS DWG), NOT TO 5GALE \�60. I SEE 'PROPOSED LIGHTING PLAN' SEE DWG No.2 \ , b• FINE GRADE LINE / SYMBOL LEGENDPROP05ED 51TE PLAN: PROPERTY LINE 51TUATED AT: SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK 6 \ �0 215"BINDER COURSE # _ t ALVAH'S L 5 G.T.M. b00 81-0I-205 ANE CUT( NY \_ �\��\��\/�\/�\�:�./�\!�\�\/�\/\\/�\L�\/\/�\�'� . SETBACK LINE / - ' - - ' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 51TE AREA: tgg3,651b2 sgft.(±22.81 ALJ COMPACTED BASE COURSE- /a STONE BLEND 012 GWISHED GONG: REMTIN6 TO 13E OVED/RELOGATED COVERAGE CALCULATIONS- FX15T1NC PROPOSED Q WATER I AND llZ 5TY FR BLDG VACANT 1142 S.F. EXISTING I� \ SANITARY 5EWB2 � x ' Q \ "open Field" I \ � TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 1,142 S.F. PAVEMENT SECTION (MINIMUM THICKNESS) STORM DRAINAGE -50 5P 50- o ASPHALT CONCRETE 2 I/2" FENCE ------- I,� Ir ii LOT COVERAGE: 25 �o / .\� / ( ` \ e 3o f c„o BINDER COUR5E EX15TING: 0.00% (0.0 5F) l COMPACTED BASE • FINE GRADE SILT FENCE 30 PROPOSED: 0.11&&%(1,142 5F) h. \ '� COURSE 4 EXISTING CONTOUR 1(� STONE BLEND OF, -6- I f CRUSHED CONCRETE -��--ovm � EXISTING GRADE x6.0 Southoitl 7ovdn \ , ' Punning Board \ T� FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION F.FL.EL. _ t- l• (`{� T OV YI`l H I OHNAY SI- E:G I F I GAT I OIy SITE PLAN BASED ON ORIGINAL SURVEY BY: m 25 sf�, TEST HOLE Llh NATE; JOHN G. EHLERS, LAND SURVEYOR, a O j 1 / �9 ASP>�+ALT E(�111PMENT STORAGE AND WAREHOUSE •� dJ, / Q �s NY5 LIG No. 50202 b. 1 QST NOT TO 5GALE STRUCTURE BY OTHERS. SEE K15TLER 6 EAST MAIN STREET RIVERHEAD, NY IIg01 N IS.O'x 1 \ 6�� FOR INFORMATION. SURVEYED: JUNE 2014 r- s • V - YQ�� �°y 6 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: TOPO PROVIDED BY: .. LY � EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP - FIVE EASTERN TOWN5 O 10 .j au 1 ti� �' SPECIFIED ON THIS DRAWING MUST BE CREATED BY: LOGKWOOD, KESSLER AND m X p� � X04 PROVIDED. ALL SILT GENERATED BY THE BARTLETT, INC. � o� EXISTING�, - PROP05ED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE DATED: 08-12-15 LLJ < LL \�O o, ,ro FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES ONLY CONTAINED ON SITE. SHEET No. BB-35 E-I X Z , , ` \ \ VERTICAL DATUM: MEAN SEA LEVEL OF Ig2q Oc1a l IRT MAINJJ�M VEHICLE PATH TO EX DIRT RDt \ a TRM RUNOFF NO \ �S 9e APPLIGANT/OWNER: 0 / CONTAINMENT REOD I WILLIAM AGKERMANN Q W \ PROP05ED: I �� \ /I AND�STORY FRAME (EQUIPM9HT STORA6E AND N N DRY USE BUIMN6- WATER \ Development to Development Rights x21.0\ 25 1 / � I (•{� FRIL= 18'0' 1 \ Town of Southold / 1 \ �XISTING \ / EXISTING DIRT xITO 25 22.811 Acres of s I ROAD TO REMAIN UTYI�POL \ c 30 � I NO GOHTAII NT REQI�ED \ EXI5TIN6 I 25 Open Field' 9c( , EXISTING WELL TO REMAIL (FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES ONLY) 'LC y Q ENGINEER: �I b, �a I EXISTING METER AND PANEL TO BE RELOCATED 1 � No 5TRM RUNOFF, / "`� I /L ti 1 . , \ e°c N I 20 NO CONTAI T REQUIRED C� 6��!�, cn p PROPOSW \ //// ///// 60, . "�y /j, 0 1 bo � � b, \ Q1-1 �- �" / PROP.APRON FOR 28'{NIDE DRIVEWAY: A / b, \ Tja \ S 6��' \��P� I . • SURFACE: BARE 501E I �R/ ;�� <� I r7ti I 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = OD, //-- ASPHALT S TYPICAL OF 2 ` / \ b4 \ �9 �' I NO 5TORMWATER CONTAINMENT 5TRUGTURE5 REQUIRED ' � }j . t w Tri le TL AREA: 1,872 S.F. ) �' �g o, l�. anq o I � !r� Mon.fnd. \ / � THERE 15 NO DEFINED x1 / BUILDING AREA STATED IN 6 ��° pcb` O % �� A �, DIRT AREA, P� Q 8 \ � � � / � SURFACE: BARE 501E S'�0 0739 A F THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS �Q �j, /O,, �� ,� ��°\ �� �� \ q0 \ / RFAGE DOCUMENT •6 / \ O /�� \ ti RUNOFF COEFFICIENT= O.0 I pROFES`' �/ �'0' ti F \NIO STORMWATER CONTAINMENT 5TRUGTURES REQUIREDo \•0L AREA: 13,951 S.F. / JEFFREY T. BUTLER, P.E. Q \ S� \ \ Q. l DIRT l- \ 25 a�la�c �ti J'J, �\oti 1Y ,.y> \ SURFACE PROPOSED I ANDNS' STY FR. BUILDING Q f 20 �r� °moo �Q�, ��� �j \ -25- ��0 \ \ \ �'rpa �4• �o USE= EQUIPMENT ST�RAEE AND WAREHOUSE t A 0 �o AREA = 1,142 SQ FT. CAST IRON FRAME AND 6RATE/GOVER �s f c��O �(0 .y� 1 \ / Ei / \�0 /� �+ FFL.EL. = 18A' �O CAMPBELL 1182 G OR APPROVED EQUAL ",o �� I- �� ED EXISTING (DRY USE-NO TER) FINAL GRADE (7U/G ELECTRICAL h / O v .18 U16 SERVICE(TO REMAIN) 0¢ I `� F QQ < N 8'TRAFFIC �° _ Z - CQ BEARING SLAB c� DRAINAGE INLET OTEG N s, ` °oe 4`PIPE DIA.MIN. ---- --- I I •• ( � 1 (WHERE c�� (TYP OF 3,SEE DETAIL\ DWG 7 '�I\ � LU � EX.VINEYARD FENCE O PIPE: I�MIN.(AS REG?-12) 1 APPLICABLE) �o��yoyy�c h Z CO HIGH DENSITY I cow y QP' o POLYETHYLENE MDPEJ ® ® o I �` sa c,��•�� Nr �a0 0\ TO REMAIN ^• SIZES REQUIRED: ® ® ® ® 1 Q� GJ' n: oj•,Q �� DIRr \ r 0 �`'/ J��J Q N O Z O DRN INLET TO 5D CONN=10"m MIN ® ® ® ® ®I �a�r�� O C` SURFACE �i F 5D TO 50 C40M=15"m MIN 1 © ® ® ® ®1 � : �� ,' � ,9 �' \ O u- � II.- ROOF � fY ROOF LDR CONN=410 MIN I © ® ® ® ®I 3'MIN. 3' 5ETBAGK FROM EX. E TO s ::;::::`:::.. o�° `Ss ry INSTALL SILT FENCE BAR ER AS SHOWN O v O ~ ® ® ® ® � 1 x275 DRIVEWAY SWEEP (TYP OF ��o \ �9 \ 1 Y MIN. I �_ ® ®_ ®_ ® .: ::::. p� �, '9\ %, h (SEE DETAIL,DWG No 2) O I `Y ® ® ® ® I WRAP STRUCTURES WITH �� �� \\ �' �°' v O ® ® ® ® ® FILTER FABRIC WE SEPARATION DISTANCE REQUIREM T5 FOR ��SAWGUT: � � � ',SD2ps �' �- `}'�\�, �6?IRT � Z O _ ... ; ; o.: Z EXIST.E.O.P.WILL PROVIDE A UNIFOR 6EOTEX 351,BY STORMWATER EAGHING STRUCTURES NO INTERCONNECTION W/NEW CURB GUT THA � �F �'� -\$ ��P�o 511RF E ll.l - ­77PROPW PIPING(OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL): ( TE �� � o F A-1 Z ® ® ® ® ® I I HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR STORM DRAT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH EXISTING A +.` \ d 7- < O I® ® ® ® ® I LEACHING POOLS: ��� 0., LK -I ® ® ® ® ® _ STORM WATER FLOW ALONG THE GUTTER EXISTING � N• v,"� N W Z LINE. MAINTAIN VALLEY GUTTER uTIL POLE �y �• o >z --I - I PROPERTY LINE= 10 MINIMUM q ® ® ® ® ® BUILDINGS WITH CELLAR= 10'MINIMUM13 9 13 1A BUILDINGS ON SLAB= 10'MINIMUM 100 50 O 100 200 300 - 400 PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE �� \ '� v = ~ LE U_ O N NON-RATEABLE WATER SERVICE LINE/LATERALS/MAINS= ID'MINIMUM GRAPHIC SCALE I" - 100'-O" APPROX.26,102 S.F.(06130 AG) 5T11N �� < < n (�{ 501E DIRT �,-A O N 8 DIAMETER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES=5 MINIMUM / SURFACE ;^off GROUND WATER SANITARY SEPTIC TANK=20 MINIMUM NOTES: - 523 gyp. I -a LL - 1- �GOLLAR MATERIAL �j SANITARY LEACHING POOL=20'MINIMUM I. LEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP ,o I tO (PEMETIZATION) GREASE TRAP=20'MINIMUM EXI INC ELEVATION5 ARE 5HOWN THUS: 25.0 '� \ �� �o RATABLE 501E PUMP STATION' TNI MINIMUM EX15TI CONTOUR LINES ARE 5HOWN THUS: 25 Q\� �Ty Z MANHOLE=20'MINIMUM \ 0, PRIVATE WELL5=50'MINIMUM s �c°u 60, Z UNDERLYING SAND AND GRAVEL STRATA RETAINING WALLS= 10'MINI" SITE PLAN PROPOSED�a b, o 0 0 FUEL 5TORA5E TANKS(BELOW 6ROUND)=20'MINIMUM o 1.DOLLAR DEPTH 15 NOT REQUIRED WHEN RATABLE MATERIAL EX15T5 FOR FULL DEPTH. STOW HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR STORM DRAINAGE �`� In n Fo , (DEDICATED TO BUILDI G R F FF 2.COLLAR MATERIAL SHALL BE GLEAN GRAVEL ONLY. NON-LEACHING S1RUG11E5: O ^'� A 3.ALL DRAINAGE STRUGTURE5 MUST BE)^RAPPED(WITH FILTER FABRIC. WATT 5EROGE LINE5/LATERAL5/MAIN5=5'MINIMUM '!//_ 40 20 O 40 80 120 160 �r INSTALL: 3 - �xiq'DP .P. TL IS WG 4.U5E 15'DIA CORRUGATED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE(HDPE)HEAVY DITTY PIPE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES=5'MINIMUM GRAPHIC 5GALE I" = 40'-O" (SDI,SD2 SD3,50 C "I. yyy 15 I AS FOR INTERCONNECTION OF ON-51TE STORM WATER LEACHING POOL5 GREASE TRAP=5'MINIMUM (�\� PAGE : A.HDPE PIPE SPECIFICATION(AA5HT0 M-2941) PUMP STATION=5'MINIMUM �\�/ l / : / B.1N5TALLATION OF HDPE SPEGIFIGATION(ASTM 0-2321) MANHOLE=5'MINIMUM \ \ G.WATERTIGHT JOINT TESTING SPECIFICATION(ASTM 0-3212) SANITARY SEPTIC TANK=5'MINIMUM D.6A5KET 5PEGIFIGATION(A5TM F-471) CON5ET5ETRUGTED l�/�}PH EN EX. 1E. PT 6yE MI . T E NH B 0 HIGHWAY PAVING SPEGIFIGATI�S, 15 [AWG. ,o TYP I GAL STORM HATER VERTICAL SEPARATION 0I5TANCE5 FOR STORM DRAINAGE LEACHING POOL (512) DETAIL WATER 5ERVIGE LINE5= 18"MINIMUM / NOT TO 56ALE 5ANITARY WASTE LINES= IB'MINIMUM 2 THESE PRAHIN65 AND AGGOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS,A5 INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE,ARE THE EXGLU51VE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RE5TRIGTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE FOR WHICH THEY WERE PREPARED.REUSE,REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD,IN WHOLE OR IN PART, 15 PROHIBITED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN PERM155ION FROM THE ARGHITEGT.TITLE TO THE5E PLANS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE ARGHITEGT. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THEM 5HALL GON5TI1`UTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDEWGE OF AGGEPTANGE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. 36'MIN.LENGTH FENCE WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN. 2"X4" WOOD FRAME POSTS DRIVEN MIN. Ib' 14 1/2 GAUGE W/MAX.b' INTO GROUND. MESH 5PAGIN6) to STAKE 10' MAX. G. TO G. n FABRIC rl -III- ... .. Ire I I 111=T�I I v I HEI6HT OF _II _ CJ FILTER I�III�1ff1111 III• p y � O� � •�,: i, VV ILI DROP INLET BRED FABRIC WITH GATE PERSPECTIVE VIEW FRAME 36"MIN.FENCE POST-� WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN. 141/2 GAUGE W/ N MAX.b'MESH 5PACI46)WITH FILTER CLOTH FLOW (IIID z GATHER EXCE55 V I I I UNDISTURBED GROUND AT CORNERSCOMPACTED SOIL EMBED FILTER CLOTH U4' V-. z GON5TRUGTION 5PEGIEIGATION5 A MIN.OF b" IN GROUND. SECTION VIEW I. FILTER FABRIC SHALL HAVE AN E05 OF 40-85. BURLAP MAY BE U5ED FOR SHORT TERM APPLICATIONS. 2.CUT FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL TO ELIMINATE JOINTS. IF JOINTS AIRE NEEDED GON5TRUGTION 5PEGIEIGATION5 THEY WILL BE OVERLAPPED TO THE NEXT STAKE. 3. STAKE MATERIALS WILL BE STANDARD 2" x 4" WOOD OR EQUIVALENT. METAL WITH A I.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FA5TENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES MINIMUM LENGTH OF 3 FEET. OR STAPLES.POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER'T'OR'U"TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 4.5PAGE 5TAKE5 EVENLY AROUND INLET 3 FEET APART AND DRIVE A MINIMUM IS 2•FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED 5ECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE INCHES DEEP. SPANS GREATER THAN 3 FEET MAY BE BRIDGED WITH THE USE OF FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION. WIRE ME5H BEHIND THE FILTER FABRIC FOR SUPPORT. FENCE 5HALL BE WOVEN WIRE,12 1/2 GAUGE,b'MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 5. FABRIC SHALL BE EMBEDDED I FOOT MINIMUM BELOW GROUND AND BACKFILLED. IT 3•WHEN THO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- 5HALL BE 5EGURELY FASTENED TO THE 5TAKE-5 AND FRAME. LAPPED BY 5IX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, b. A 2" x 4" WOOD FRAME SHALL BE COMPLETED AROUND THE CREST OF THE FABRIC MIRAFI IOOX,5TA13ILINKA T140N,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. FOR OVER FLOW STABILITY.MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA I ACRE 4.PREFABRIGATED UNITS SHALL BE 6EOFAB,ENVIROFENGE,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 5.MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS,NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN 'BULGE5"DEVELOP IN THE 51LT FENCE. U.5.DEPARTMENT OF AGRIGULiURE FILTER FABRIC U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRIGULTURE NATURAL RE50URCE5 CONSERVATION SERVICE DROP INLET NATURAL RE50URGE5 CONSERVATION SERVICE SILT NEW Y ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION YSTATE DEPARTMENT OF REION NEWORATE 501LL t KA-MR GON5ERVAIDNMMPROTECTION NEW YORK STATE 501L d WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE FENCE �' m m I r _. k AUG 2 9 2015 j� rr " i�-I m � o % o:o o:o o:o o:o o:o o.o o:o + o'.o o:0 0:0 0'.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 � Sou?i!uli Cor,,n �/ O � / y Planning Board m X do O:0 0:0 O:o 0.1 0.1 b.1 0.1 b.l o.0 do 0'.o 4cy�11 � � X b•I O:o 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 ' .2 0.1 0.1 0:0 �'>� Q B2A &--4X Z L1T e o^���Tgoc 0:00.1 d.2 '3 63 d.4 d.3 d.3 d.2 b.l o:o o:o Twin 75 Watt Quartz Bullet floods come pre-assembled and pre-wired 0.0 0.1 3 0.4 db 6.q 6.1 65 0.3 0.2 :o do + on C103 Mounting plate. Lamps supplied. O 0.0 0.0 0.4 OS i3 T.l 1.4 d,q OS 0.3 0.1 :O O:O • O !_ Lamp Info Ballast Info E•-� � T 60 6.2 6A i3 3.8 '1.8 ib da 6.5 6.1 0:0 '0 Type: T-4 Type: NIA 0 O 0 D 0 0.2 �2 2.1 'I.I OS 0.1 O:O O:O :O b.a b.o b 1 Shape/Size: N/A 208V: N/A 3 i.q Co d5 dz o:o do o:o o:o � m Base: N/A 240V: N/A 0.01 0.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.9 bANSI: N/A 277V: N/A � • .� 0.4 d.2 d.1 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:o d b.o .ol o.0 0.1 0.1 'o.i b.o 0.0 O.O 0. 0.0 0.1 0.2 03 0.4 '0.2 0.0 Hours: 1,500 Input Watts: 75W '0.4 03 d.2 d.l o0 0:0 o:O O:o o:o O:0 0:O O: O:O RAB NOTES: Lamp Lumens: 1,500 Efficiency: 100% O.O b.0 .I 0.2 0.3 0.4 05 0.9 '0.2 I b.1 o.o O:O o:O ob o.0 o:0 o.b ob o:o o. 0:0 Efficacy: 20 LPW 'o o:o o:o d.1 d.1 d.1 6. d.1 o:0 o.b ' o:o THE LIGHT LOSS FACTO (LLF) 15 A PRODUCT OF MANY O.o b.o ' I b.2 0.3 bb i.3 i.3 1 VARIABLES, ONLY LAMP LUMEN DEPRECIATION(LLD) HA5 BEEN Technical Specifications I� d.1 d.1 02 0.2 0.2 0'.2 0. 6.1 O.o 0:0 b 0'0 APPLIED TO THE CALGU TED RESULTS UNLE55 OTHERK15E NOTED. ENGINEER= b.o b.a '.1 O.z '0.4 IN h �.8 THE LLD 15 THE RESULT(GlUOTIENT) OF MEAN LUMENS/ INITIAL UL Listing: O.O O.a .I 10.2 `03 0.7 i.4 ib 4.2 2 .2 0.2 0:4 0.5 :4 0. 6.1 0:0 O:O :O O:o , "- LUMEN5 PER LAMP MANUF`AGTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. Suitable for wet locations. Suitable for mounting within OF NEW y b.0 b. 0.1 0.2 0.3 b5 0.9 T.b 2 ' .1 t9 0. , .3 O: I.b O: d.5 03 0:o 0:0 0:0 :o 1.2m (4ft) of the ground. ,<�i T• ev 09 ILLUMINATION VALUES 9HOM (IN FOOTCANDLES) ARE THE 'f- O.a 0.0 '0.1 0.2 03 05 'OS T.1 T.O 0.8 O. 8 2 I.I 0.9 6.5 d3 O. O.0 0. 0.0 F PREDICTED RESULTS, F PLANES OF CALCULATION EITHER co 'P 25 Housing: b.o b.o `0.1 0.1 b.z b3 05 05 05 0.4 d 1 I�.� oe 0.7 03 6.1 o. o:o o. HORIZONTAL,VERTICAL R INCLINED AS, DESIGNATED IN THE g Precision die cast aluminum 1/2 NPS threaded arm r ui CALCULATION SUMMARY. METER ORIENTATION 15 NORMAL TO THE ,I�T ` I w -f- (2) QUARTZ DUAL BULLET KIT with locking swivel and EZ Grip lock nut fits all standard 0 _z 'o.o b.o 0.0 0.l o.l 0.1 b.2 b.2 b.2 b. � 0.8 0.9 o.b os d.l ob o. o:o PLANE OF CALCULATION. DEL No. QB2B mounting covers. m2 b.o b.o b.o 0.o o.o b.o 'o.l b.1 b.1 o. 0.5 0.2 d.l o:o o:o o:o o. o:o NTING HEIGHT = 13.5' ABY GRADE s �� PROPOSED * THE CALCULATED RESULTS OF TH15 LIGHTING 51MULATION F 73493 b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o L 'ATED ABOVE DRIVE THRU SLIDING DOORS REPRESENTS AND ANTICIPATED PREDICTION OF SYSTEM Lens Gasket: -AR p�P� . I AND (�2 STY FR. BLDG 0'2 0.1 0:0 0:0 0:0 0:0 0. o:o �. O F E S S� b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o b.0 F.FL.EL. = Ib.O' PERFORMANCE. ACTUAL MEASURED RESULTS MAY VARY FROM High temperature silicone gasket stays in place during o. O.o b.o b.o 'o.o b.o o.l 0.2 d.1 0:0 0'0 0.l dl dl : o:o o:o THE ANTICIPATED PERFO ANCE AND ARE SUBJECT TO MEANS JEFF Y"1 T 11TLER, P.E. . : . . . . . relamping. b.o' .o b.o b.o o.l 0.2 0.2 b d.1 6.1 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.1 o:o o:o :o AND METHODS WHICH BEYOND THE CONTROL OF RAB Q LIGHTING, INC. Reflector: o.o ' .o b.o b.i 0.2 b.4 ba o d.2 6.3 63 d.4 0:0 6.2 6.2 '.I b.1 00:0 * Semi-specular anodized aluminum. O 1 MOUNTING HE16HT DETERMINATION 15 JOB 51TE SPECIFIC,OUR O.O Q4 .O b.l b.2 b.5 ID 23 I I 0.3 0.4 Ob d.l O:O 0.3 0.3 0.2 O:O O. O:O o � LIGHTING SIMULATIONS A SUME A MOUNTING HEIGHT(INSERTION Sockets: 0.0 0.0'o� '.I o.2 0.4 bb iJ 25 d.5 , 0.5 i3 i.5 dq d.T d.5 d3 d.2 :1 0:0 0: 0'0 POINT OF THE LUMINAIRE YMBOU TO BE TAKEN AT THE TOP OF ix \ THE 5YMBOL FOR GEILI MOUNTED LUMINARIES AND AT THE Porcelain bi-pin GY 8 base with gold plated contacts O b.o 'o.o b.o . b.2 b3 0.5 o.q T.3 i.1 0.. i3 23 iT i.4 d.9 d.5 0'3 d.1 0:0 0:o BOTTOM OF THE 5YMBOL FOR ALL OTHER LUMINAIRE MOUNTING and 250° C socket wires. 3 a CONFIGURATIONS. 1�4Z - u- OO O.0 O.0 � `0.2 0.5 08 T.I 0.4 08 0. I 1.8 18 Ib 08 05 0.1 :O 00 0.0 Lens: Zj }- O Q bo b.o b.o 0.oc' ;;,1p 0.2 03 b3 0.3 0.2 0.2 1 �� d.2 z.1 LI d5 d.2 :0 0:0 o:o o RAB LIGHTING, INC. LUM[NAIRE AND PRODUCT DE516I 5 ARE Thick, tempered glass. Qi I- Z m LU b.o b.o b.o b. ". b.o b.1 0.1 b.1 b.l b.0 PROTECTED UNDER U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL I } '� Z 2.3 1.9 I.0 05 0.2 0.1 O:O O:O Finish: �..{ O O 0 cam, PROPERTY LAWS. I o.o o.o b.o b.o o b.o b.o b.o b.o o.o 0.1 d.2 d.9 6A o.8 d.4 d. 6.1 O:o O:o PATENTS ISSUED OR PENDING APPLY. THE LIGHTING ANALYSIS, EZ-LAYOUT,ENERGY ANALYSIS AND /OR VISUAL SIMULATIONS ("LIGHTING Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings Q v - < b.o b.o b.o b.o ' .0 0,0 0.0 b.0 b.0 b.1 b. 0.3 DE51ON") PROVIDED BY RAB LIGHTING, INC. ('RAB') REPRE5ENT5 AND ANTICIPATED PREDICTION OF are formulated for high-durability and long-lasting color, f1 LY do 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0:3 0:2 0.1 0:0 o:O 9 ty g- g b.o 'O.0 0.0 0. b.o b.o 0.0 b.1 0.2 0.3 b.4 b. LIGHTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASED UPON DESIGN PARAMETERS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY (� (� < / Luminaire Location Sumimary OTHERS. THESE DESIGN PARAMETERS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. ,...� v Q b.0 b.o O. b.0 O.O '0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 '1.3 '1.3 do 0:o 0.o ell O.1 d.1 O:o 0:0 0:0 � Z O LumNo Ta (Qt ) Label MN Ht Orient Tilt VERIFIED BY RAB AND THEREFORE ACTUAL MEASURED RE5ULT5 MAY VARY FROM THE ACTUAL FIELD Z o.o 0.0 ' .0 0.0 b.l b.2 b.4 b.l 'IS 2.3 . X0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 O:0 O:O J Replacement Lamps: LU - Ib CONDITIONS. RAB REGOMMEN05 THAT DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OTHER INFORMATION BE FIELD rr� b.0 b b.o b.o o.o o.o b.q '1.T 3� 0.2 0.0 do 1 Al (2) 0132 3 8 226.08 60 VERIFIED THE REDUCE VARIATION. Z O o.o do do�� RAB NEITHER WARRANTEES, EITHER IMPLIED OR STATED WITH REGARD TO ACTUAL MEASURED LIGHT J Z V ' o o.0 0.1 0.2 03 b.T '1.4 '18 4.2 23 b.9 b.2 b.o b.o � 2 A2 (2) QB2B 13.5 223.07 60 LEVELS OR ENERGY CONSUMPTION LEVELS AS COMPARED TO THOSE ILLUSTRATED BY THE LIGHTING Installation: I� J ly o o.o b•I b.2 b3 0.5 0.q ih 2.1 T.9 0.9 b.4 'O.0 0.0 Qty 3 AI (2) 0628 8 226.08 60 DESIGN. RAB NEITHER WARRANT•EE5, EITHER IMPLIED OR STATED, NOR REPRE5ENT5 THE Twin 75w Flood Kit pre-assembled on C103 plate for � V_ IL [f) (V S b.o b.o b.1 b.2 '0.3 `0.5 bb i.1 io b ��� APPROPRIATENESS, COMPLETENESS OR SUITABILITY OF THE L16HTINO DESIGN INTENT AS, COMPLIANT easy installation: v U_ O a b.4 b.1 ' . +J 4 Al (2) 013213 8 226.OP� 60 WITH ANY APPLIGABLE REGULATORY CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TH05E < 5 O E-� > r 'o.o b.o b.1 b.l `0.2 b3 '0.5 '0.5 0.5 b.4 '03 ' . 0.0 5 QB2 13.5 223.07 60 SPECIFICALLY STATED ON DRAWINGS CREATED AND SUBMITTED BY RAB. THE LIGHTING DESIGN 15 � (4) QUARTZ DUAL BULLET KIT A2 (2) Patents: - O ISSUED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART,AS ADVISORY DOCUMENTS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND IS NOT b.o b.o b.o b.1 0.1 b.1 b.2 b.2 b.2 '. b.1 b.o MODEL No. 0526 6 AI 2 QB2 L3 226.08 60 RAB sensor and fixture designs are protected under < MOUNTING HEIGHT = 8' ABV GRADE ( ) INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION NOR AS, BEING PART OF A PROJECT'S C,ONSTRUGTION DOCUMENT U.S. and International Intellectual Property laws. 'o.o b.o 0.0 b.0 b.o b.o b.1 '. 0.1 0.0 0.0 PACKAGE. p rty Total Quantity: 6 � � O 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' . .o b.0 b.0 b.o b.o b.o Z . .o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.o b.o b.o 7 O bD bD bD 0.0 0.o Luminaire 5Ghedule O p v :.: : . 0.0 b.0 0.0 Symbol Tag Qty abet Arrangement TI Lamp Lumens Lum. Lumens LLF Description Lum. Hatts Arr. Watts Total Hatts Filename bO Al 4 62B 2 ® a0° 1500 152 1.000 Quartz Dual Head Bullet Kit - 15H 15 150 300 QBI - L512065JE-5 A2 2 B2B 2 @ a00 1500 152 1.000 Quartz Dual Head Bullet Kit - 15H 15 150 300 QBI - L51200JE5 PAGE : ENLARGED PLAN Calculation Summary JEFFREY T. E3UTLER, P.E. 15 NOT RE5PON51BLE FOR 5AFETY AND 5ECURITY RI5K5 DUE TO INADEQUATE LIGHT LEVEL5. i�ROP05DXTfiZI OR L I C�#TI NC �' Label Description GalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min 1't5pcL Pt5pGTb TH15 15 NOT A RECOMMENDED LIGHT LAYOUT. IT 15 A „ _ Cal(R5 5ite Readings Taken at 0'-0" AF6 Illuminance Fc 0.06 4.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. 5 5 80-112 AND 5UB�EGTI0N THE �2 - EXTERIOR IGHTINGEGTION SCALE: I - 20'-0" 2 THESE DRAWINGS AND AGCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS,AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE,ARE THEE CLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND THEIR USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL 51TE FOR MIGH THEY WERE PREPARED.REU5E REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD I IN WHOLE OR IN PART 15 PROHIBITED EX 0 TE EXCEPT BY WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ARCHITECT. TITLE TO THESE PLANS SHALL REMAIN WITH THE ARCHITECT. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THEM SHALL CONSTITUTE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATE C U T C H 0 G 'lJ E '0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ao � �� 9p s ti�p� r SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK �Z c � S.C. TAX No. 1000- 102- 04- 6. 1 �°G y9ja ��v��o � cF � `y�o C) do o lid S/��O �6 p�` �� o JN °As` ��Fti " V, ��' SCALE 1 "= 1 00' 0 0 oA oti °F S' -, �'� ��' q�Z 00 � °,tip , �, JANUARY 28, 2016 Q� OW0) s° 00,, � SG% -W,y M S`` F 6AREA = 993,659 sq. ft. o W oG 22.81 1 ac. ti CY) tiT� CERTIFIED TO: L_� o NORTH FORK VITICULTURE SERVICES, LLC 41� o" v CHAMPION ABSTRACT LLC - OCHAMP-060309S �F�P Z Q L \�? Z Z O \00 Ow Q OBJ 0 `3.9 W M t0 o O 0 -D61, /011 - �iyF� po �o ztiq' �oF 'L 2iq o� rC'�Q o°actio ��ti cF o ?S , 00 ,o � X6'�C��0 e �0 ��eG�o Sro F ,,6 oo P� 00 �Fe°tio �Fa 20 ���� o ry F �: sA °�� � + F C' �1P C d 94 �� 5���� Pio Q �e F��� i� 0, 4; °o�S 00 NOTE: G ?9So� GRAPE VINYARD ROWS ARE NOT SHOWN. o LTJ '0 0�40�G40 S�� °Ati FFA D0T g4PQ4 Oh QO ?°F 1 O CV 9� �� o�� GQC� O°O� °h9 J `9i F'I'O OF 9 °.n 4 !_ qo°°°/r- Q%ycF �O O Cin !,yc<1 �iyti J A A ti0 Lr,! of 01- J� GLOP �� V 2 G,Q tl�� �,��` O•J �O', 00 OCA J GF'o� 'C;. J��ro�' D L� 1:..� lJ lJ E 44- SyP� �°'' ����'� AUG 2 9 2016 U Planning Board �4F .'� OF J� � ls� �� ° PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM �p G SP RFFVS �� STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE L.I.A.L.S. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED Q0�055� FOTRESUCH ASSOCIAUSE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND of c o4 N. N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION Nathan T of t Corwin TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF III SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. Land Surveyor �r \ COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING ✓J 1 THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED r TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN Successor To: Stanley J. Iscksen, Jr. L.S. R® ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE I( AI i v TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Title Surveys — Subdivisions — Site Plans — Construction Layout 1�J1 LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. OFFICES LOCATED AT MAILING ADDRESS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT WAYS 1586 Main Road P.O. Box 16 ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. Jamesport, New York 11947 Jamesport, New York 119 .......... _i.-.-;.i;, �f-�--- j I � i I I � I I � I I; '-'T., T i;i.'?'""' ,I - �C C�--, ; I I i I I i I I II � ' � � � ® I I ��II �I , I � I I I;� III A 1� I I Hill 111 1111111 11 1 11 ................._---------- ...................................... ..... ......_._.. ......._W.. RTF FEEHI IT -Faw-H R#vg, J��P TTIP EU� RAJJO p ElI C> LM.AMU, M J EL F I -40L -71 4b 4L Yr In I-P T 11-Y 1-1 F T QP 11!�- I 2a-f7 15 I'-G" �s em Q1 0- 12 12 3 .438 �/ a 3 .438 12 iz Af / III Jill 07 i � �Tllp IIII C G-1 -- If_ t Aw- LA Vl 00. C e i L �r. L 1 4 T ' I • Go.. , Ie earth fit °° meters 200 pF-v5/ t,�GK,iz/Zlvn w,-j 8 Nz rj {oSFa 13 S'U L✓1g'�'r�S �- �lZ QA'd AIW CoCA.'E2 L-oovclmy SE 13 SU /41-v✓}1-15 LANE NTVS 1,4CKF_2MAN,.j S I r,6 i $`a4 im mom OR ?ly - ,± _„ `u } US Ovy ww '•''f "`. '�'t+i:irr ,>a,3,s,.,+� r�'rwrT�$ va r t ���• 1 • r� 'r. ;, "� ,1?,, � - 1� � s itis _ •, ' '1 •. - 1P �' �" " " `r� 3f .�f ! '�'a '•t NT�1� t»+� r xF�'!`�i `� �. � 77, l "77," �,t •a' �t�p{� 4+••' r` � r Iv r ♦yf"w�• y �� 1 } `r _- a i 1. 3 j +,,) - , � � + - L y r r- 'ii7� 'y _r r~ FI�k14♦ w��� - – - _��Yf�X_—� __ _ h Al i , '. d! 1+ � "t a�- rt•��rr• y , a?7.-71��„e;� �•�•��}�. A �d � r i �� � � y 't- r� _ , �•, r, h ' � '" ' r ' F'��A f, ,fit" , + _ � ♦ as 3 ,�� .F r � — r �-- -, .y 1, �, - - d• 4It .r di I' _�ddmmm wilt—_11K -- - - �� 4r�+mss �...+•�.�-y -r- _ n .f— r .r 4 .� .-Ate. - - w 4 •r• 'b .% t 5 _ _ •�rr �w�' F ° 94'-9" out/ out DERMA-COLUMN POSTS ----------------- Tp�o TT=) FIT ' k 71- 1511 8'-p" 8'-0" 8'-O" 8'-0" 8'-O" 8'-0" 8'-0" 3'-G" 1 4'-9" 5'-9" 7'-�2" . Excellence Integrity '* Distinction — * f - - - -- -- - -- -- ---- * - — 41- — — ----- — x. G�N�t?AI� N01�5 71 P.O. Box 395 Fogelsville, PA. 18051 A C ALL POSTS ARE TO BE MIN. 6300 2"X G"S.Y.P. PERMA-COLUMNS PHONE: 1 —800—KISTLER (547-8537) 3 AS SHOWN IN DRAWING. 0 0 4 3 P05T FOOTINGS ARE TO BE 4'-O"(MIN.) BELOW GRADE. MEMBER SINCE E—MAIL: info©kistlerbuildings.com ALL POSTS ARE TO GET(2)GALVANIZED STEEL UPLIFT BRACKETS. E'. ALL POSTS TO 51T ON MIN. 8"DEEP x 18"0 CONCRETE FOOTING PADS 1983 WEB SITE: www.KistierBuildings.com p` ESTABLISHED GRADE HEIG D Y1NG GIVE O 5TO BE THER G POINT NOF T DIGAD. CUSTOMER'S LEVEL CJ PAD. '.o.,».a� .:'!,+ i," n c .• . FINAL GRADING 11-DING SITE BY OTHERS INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR)f ,1 `"�' UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OR CONTRACTED. `:: ..`;: • -. {n,•',,, KTeio+.,-�:�g ? ��\� ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED f0 HEADERS C,01 SUPPORTS,AND RAFTERS TO BE#I -S.Y. P. , KD-1 9. - I ALL DIMENSIONAL LUMBER THAT IS TO BE ATTACHED TO TREATED _ _ \ \PG' MATERIAL I5 TO BE ATTACHED WITH 20d GALVANIZED RING SHANK NAILS. — 4 I O PRE-ENGIN EKED CLE SPAN TR SSSS @ 4 0 o/c Q = �.,'. 4 •, / ALL NON BEARING MEMBERS SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO GIRT5, TYPICAL EE 5HEET # FOR TRU S LAYOUT . �a� `' .r `F ,:; '°`� ;' `;. ''`'_•_;,"" • ( � - PURLINS,AND DOOR SOFFITS TO BE#2 OR BETTED.S.P.F. "' . . +� � �+ �.�-<�.-, ,� ,_,; 7•,_ `c,.,.F.\ P;' 3 031 3 ALL TREATED MATERIAL TO BE EITHER C.A.,OR EQUAL TREATMENT. r' i -�t r `A 'ermann Stt m srt 1 A 4-91 -DENOTES CONCRETE PAD. a p• q,glvshs�n pi, t 1� I .'Qys .Catch ue < i .r L'�JCCftgCJllE "ti Q] -DENOTES(6300)2"x 6"PERMA-COLUMN POST. 5 �. a � .>+ �; ..� I , 1193a .. m.�aacn 13 -DENOTES 6300 2"x "P MA- P 6 ER COLUMN 05T WITH DOORJAMB LINEWk, Lam IsJ:+nd..Suu :"Si�au Fatm3 :t� r�'etr:+.Fr r. _ p^1 -DENOTES(3-PLY) 2"x G"TIE-DOWN BLOCK. '..' _�, ` `'. � \`,3.\` p..i., Vbatehrille � -r�, t"•., �'�.y:,^�<C jx;;�>sau<�T�+'•Yt p �' y 4 I .�. I � I GON5112UC�'ION N01�5 �r O = ?1 i `�• ,>l,>,t, \`•��•y "�`�.," w 4' NWw a4Patk•'. O A << HOLD ALL DOORS + 4"FOR CONCRETE FLOOR. .<+2F'.'•1�...°"p is R a{ {� 'a:Q W I I ti• t^ `r (n Maf uEfc' c dck� � LOOP 1��SIGN �OAI�ING �-���Y�^ � .tt:'� t .�! _�; ���< .<, p ,..• , : TOP CHORD 30 PSF LIVE LOAD cJ� �: •• +' 1- TOP CHORD - 8-PSF DEAD LOAD ?� ..�....,, _. :':>,.•<. `a>; ,.iM `�is I '. Q / . A.•• , .' � BOT CHORD = 5-PSF DEAD LOAD r: _ - m TOTAL LOAD 43 PSF a 1 Ln J1: oJ - O1 WIMP b� I �OAil N G �x 0 :h l b x $89t lhs v ZS�aitl( Q = W = Q 120 MPH WIND-SPEED LOAD „ • 1 e: IDG AP YF,' ONTI UOUS VEN ED RIDGE O I? z i — I - a r� l� I Q Ml w � I J W i 0 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE WITH MY SIGNATURE THAT I �, CONFORM To THE IRC Zoos BUILDING CODE.. PERSONALLY HAVE REVIEWED AND UNDER5TAND THESE PLANS — O �/ U , NEW YORK EDITION. o z z , _-___._.____ o ( AND HEREBY APPROVE CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED A5 DRAWN o I / o zv o w I - CUSTOMER DATE LU U � o c I o ANY CHANGES HEREAFTER MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING. z O N I PLEASE CONTACT YOUR FIELD REPRE5ENTATIVE REGARDING 4" CONCRETE FLOOR Ir I ANY CHANGES, AND / OR C05T5 OF CHANGES. ' TH OUGHOUT BUILDING S 1 TE DATA THIS DRAWING CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND TRADE SECRET 7/� 8 8 8 0 8 0 7-�z+ O INFORMATION, IS THE PROPERTY OF MILER POLE BUILDING JURISDICTION: CO., INC.AND IS GIVEN TO THE RECEIVER IN CONFIDENCE. _ z THE RECEIVER BY RECEPTION AND RETENTION OF THE 3'-113/8 8 I COUNTY: DRAWING ACCEPTS THE DRAWING IN CONFIDENCE AND -70 _ —� AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY ---------------------- 1 0 BLOCK# LOT# KISTLER POLE BUILDING CO., INC. IT WILL(1) NOT USE THE r I Q DRAWING OR ANY COPY THEREOF OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR U5E GROUP: 5-1 TRADE SECRET INFORMATION THERON; (2) NOT COPY THE r DRAWING; (3) NOT DISCLOSE TO OTHERS EITHER THE DRAW- ` ' CONST. TYPE: 5-5 ING OR THE CONFIDENTIAL OR TRADE SECRET INFORMATION 2 \ \ / \ / \ / \ _ * / Q_ / \ \ / 1 — -� THOCN;AND (4) UPON COMPLENON OF THE NEO)TO RE- / / 1 1 1 I o TOTAL AREA: 5,535 SQ. FT. TAIN THE DRAWING, OR UPON DEMAND, RETURN THE DRAW- N r ING, ALL COPIES THEREOF AND ALL MATERIAL COPIED A 3 o TOTAL VOLUME: I I G, 120 CU. FT. THEREFROM. I I / I I I I::.. I I \PCS• � o O� o I Awk �.'•.. I I I 4" CONCRETE FLOOR I w 0 t, I THROUGHOUT >- pT 1' j Cz R� 4/2 1/ 1 G ADDED CUPOLAS MOVED STAIR LOCATION. �'•.`. m r REV. Ln ' I O — REV. Q w �,• 1 { j m 4 I '�' = 4 `� REV. pp < p I E I o w L LU REV. z_ Q \ / REV. LUREV. 0 I 0Z O T` M, REV. O z REV. T•; I U I V I c r \ REV. I I / � = I/ri"v \ — — \,,, // --_ � REV. REV. — FOR I WILLIAM A CKZRMALJIV V / `� ADDRESS: Li 50 L�1�T"H O(_ t� , N Y 11 —71 BUILDING j SITE: 4'-47 2'-1 I /a 1 C L,l_C:H OG L�I� 5 .I 8'-O" 8'-0" 8'-0" j 8'-0" 8+ p+ 6'-�2 8'-G" 8'-O" 8'-O" j 8'-O'I 8' GI+ NY 1 I �� �J ,� _ —- -- — --- �` -- -- --— — —-- ----— f --------�+ -- ----- ,� ---- - -- -- WI N f�OW & 1�OOp SC N�I�LIL PROJECT: 5YM. TYPE OF WINDOW/DOOR MODEL# R.O. JAMB WIDTH hARDWARE GLAZING QTY. -41 ! X % % ! X (`I ' F_QUII�M�N1' 5-'O�I & 51MONTON THERMAL PANE 51MONTON TEMPERED VINYL SINGLE HUNG STANDARD 3040 36"x45" 1 y" TEMPERED 5 WINDOW w/SCREENS+�GRILLES LATCH i I I 53'-9" 4 1'-0" out/out PERMA-COLUMIN P05TS 5HW DOUBLE GLAZED 41 X '6140 X 14 ' WOhK5H0P w/ A1--rIC --- ---------------------- -- -------- 7� ----- -- — — - 3OG8 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/THERMA-TRU 383/8"x s LEVERED TEMPERED 2 9-LITE HALF GLA55>r COLONIAL PANELS 2G2HD 822/;" 4 /6 LOCK5ET INSULATED 2 IN LEFT HALF GLA55 DRAWING TITLES: THERMA-TRU s TEMPERED 3068 INSULATED STEEL CLAD ENTRY DOOR w/ 2G2HD 38/8'x 4 y/6" LEVERED INSULATED I j 9-LITE HALF GLA55 47 COLONIAL FA,'JELS 82Y2° LOCKSET 00� & P05-r PLAN �/ 162 I 1 -011 IN RIGHT HALF GLA55 I I � O INSULATED STEEL RAISED PANEL OVERHEAD 14'x 12' 14'-0"x COMMERCIAL TEMPERED 4 DOOR w/(1) ROW GLA55+-INTERIOR LOCK I.R.P. 12-4' 8 y" TORSION SPRINGS GLA55 5 41NTERIO LOCKS "NOTE: ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS MUST BE APPROVED FOR 1 20mph WIND LOAD SCALE: AS SHOWN CHECKED BY: DATE: 3/ �I/ 201 C2 APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: 1?Cr FIELD REP. MICHAEL_ COCCO DRAWING NO. SHEET OF K-�-4860 5 5 ARCHITECTURAL PK ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION ONLY: