HomeMy WebLinkAbout3317500 ~ilkworth & 50 t{ome Pike ~d. ~
~ttituck, NY ~
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3317
Application Dated
TO: Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
for MR. THOMAS PERILLO
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
as Attorney
[Appellant(s)]
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on February ]4, ]985,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[ ~ Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article III , Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule
[ ] Request for
Upon application for THOMAS PERILLO, c/o Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.,
Main Road, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article
III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient area and width of
parcels in this proposed division of land located at Silkworth Road
and Home Pike, Mattituck, NY; District 1000, Section 114, Block 1,
Lot 7.
WHEREAS, the public hearing on the appeal application of THOMAS
PERILLO, Appeal No. 3317, was held on February 14, 1985, and aT1--
testimony from said hearing have been taken into consideration by
each board member in making these findings and determination;
WHEREAS, at said hearing, there was no opposition given in the
record; and
WHEREAS, each of the board members have viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and its surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact and
determination:
l. The property in question is located in the 'A-80" Residential
and Agricultural Zoning District;
2. The property in question is identified on the Suffolk County
Tax Map as District 1000, Section 114, Block 1, Lot 7, and is shown
on survey map dated May 30, 1984 as vacant property of a total of
3.1974 acres;
3. Article III, Section lO0-31, and Bulk Schedule of the Zoning
Code, requires a minimum area of 80,000 sq. ft. and minimum lot width
of 175 feet for each proposed parcel of land established subsequent
to June 10, 1983 (date effectuated);
4. Parcel #1 is proposed to be 1.5323 acres (66,746± sq. ft.)
consisting of Part of Lot 19, and 20 of a former 1916 subdivision
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
DATED: February 20,
Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81)
1 985.
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN
OF APPEALS
ZONING BOARD
Page 2 - Appeal No. 3317
Matter of THOMAS PERILLO
Decision Rendered February 14, 1985
of "Point Pleasant," having frontage along Home Pike Road of 144.20±
feet and an average lot width of 248.10 feet, with frontage along
Darby's Branch of Mattituck Creek of 352± feet (along a tie line).
5. Parcel #2 is proposed to be 1.6651 acres (72,531 sq. ft.)
consisting of Lots 17, 18, and part of 19 of the former subdivision
of 1916 of "Point Pleasant,'~ and having frontage along Home Pike Road
of 80± feet and an average lot width of 150+ feet with frontage along
Darby's Branch of Mattituck Creek of 260± feet (see survey dated
May 30, 1984).
6. In viewing the area, the board finds: (a) the neighboring
parcels to the west to be of a size similar or smaller than that
proposed by this application, varying from 44,000 sq. ft. and greater
for area, and from 80' lot width and greater; (b) the relief
is the minimal available under the circumstances.
7. The right-of-way in question is private and is pending
acceptance by this board as to anticipated improvements in accordance
with the September 30, 1982 decision of this board under Appeal
No. 3025, pursuant to New York Town Law, Section 280-A.
In considering this appeal, the board also finds:
1. That the relief requested is minimal;
2. That this proposal is consistent with those parcels generally
existing in the surrounding neighborhood;
3. That there will be no effect on population density and thereby
will not effect available governmental facilities;
4. That there is no substantial change in the character of this
area or a substantial detriment to adjoining properties;
5. That the circumstances are unique;
6. That the relief requested cannot be obviated by another
method feasible to appellant other than a variance;
7. That in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose,
justice will be served by allowing the variance, as conditionally noted
below.
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr.
Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3317 in
the Matter of THOMAS PERILLO as shown on survey dated May 30, 1984),
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That there be no further lot size reductions (no further
division);
2. New York Town Law, Section 280-A, concerning conditions as
imposed by this board involving the subject right-of-ways, extending
from Westphalia Road and along premises of the applicant, as follows:
(a) Commencing from Westphalia Road and extending along
the premises in question: [1] a minimum width of 15 feet and [2]
such minimum 15-foot width shall be surfaced with a minimum depth
of two inches of packed three-quarter-inch stone blend so as to
afford access for emergency vehicles. Such stone blend may be
either applied to the ground surface and shaped, or the surface
may be excavated to permit the application of packed blend to a
depth of two inches;
(b) Commencing from Silkworth Road and extending along
the premises in question: [1] a minimum width of 15 feet and [2]
such minimum 15-foot width shall be surfaced with a minimum depth
of four inches of packed three-quarter-inch stone blend so as to
afford access for emergency vehicles. Such stone blend may be
either applied to the ground surface and shaped, or the surface
Page 3 - Appeal No. 3317
Matter of THOMAS PERILLO
Decision Rendered February 14,
1 985
shall be excavated to permit the application of packed blend to a
depth of four inches;
(c) Where the terrain of the land over which such access
roads are traversed is such that drainage problems may occur, the
applicant and/or owners shall be required to construct such
drainage facilities as may be recommended by this board;
(d) That this access road must be maintained at all
times in good satisfactory condition as stipulated above for
access by emergency vehicles;
(e) That this access road be approved, after notification,
by the Board of Appeals as to meeting the above requirements.
Location of Property: Silkworth Road and Home Pike Road,
Mattituck, NY; 1000-114-1-7.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis,
Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote
of all the members.
lk
GERARD P. GOE'~NGER, CH~RMAN
February 20, 1985
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the
Town Law and the Provisions of the Code of the Town of
Southold, the following public hearings will be held by the
Southold Town Board of Appeals at the Southold Town Nall~
Main Road, Southold, New York at a Regular Meeting commencing
at 7:30 p.m. on THURSDAy, FEBRUARY 14,. 1985:
7:30 p.m. Application for PETER J. AND MARGARET S. TROYANO,
c/o R.F. Lark, Esq. Main Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 for a
Variance to New York Town Law, Section 280-a for approval of
access over a private right-of-way located on the north side
of C.R. 48, Peconic (along land now or formerly McGunnigie)
to premises known and identified as District 1000, Section 73,
Block 4, Lot 4.
7:40 p.m. Application of JOSEPH AND PATRICtA STIEFER,
5760 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission: (a) to
build accessory horse barn in the frontyard area and (b) to
erect fencing exceeding four-feet in height in the frontyard
area, premises known as 6760 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY;
District 1000, Section 121, Block 04, Lot 08.
7:45 p.m. Application for THOMAS PERILLO, c/o Rudolph H.
Bruer, Esq., Main Road, Southold, NY for a Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article IIZ, Section 100-31 for approval of
insufficient area and width of parcels in this proposed division
of land located at Silkworth Road and Home Pike, Mattituck,
District 1000, Section 114, Block 1, Lot 7.
7:50 p.m. Application for ANTHONY PAGOTO, c/o Swim King
Pools, Route 25A, Rocky Point, NY 11778, for a Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 for permission
to locate inground pool in an area other than the required
rearyard, at Bayberry Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, NY;
District lO00, Section !ll, Block 15, Lot 1~6 (part of 1.3).
7~55 p.m. Application for ESTATE OF LOUISE WILSON, c/o
Wic~ha~ Wickham & Bresster, P.C.~ Main Road, Mattituck~ NY for
a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III, Section 100-31
and a Variance to New York Town Law, Section 280-a for approval
of access over a proposed p~ivate right-of~way to be located on
the north side of Main Road, Mattituck, NY~ premises identified
as D~strict 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 19.
?age 2 Legal Not~ce of Hearings
Regular Meeting of THURSDA¥~FEB~ 14, 1985
Southold Town Board of Appeals
8:05 pom. Application of .C~TCHOGU~..FREE LIB~ARY~ 27550 Main
Road~ Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance~
Article III, Section lO0~30(B)~ 100-31, and 100-119, for permis~
sion to construct library addition leaving an insufficient
rearyard setback at premises known as 27550 Main Road, Cutchogue,
NY~ District 1000, Section 109~ Block 06, part of Lots 1 and 2.
8:10 pom. Application of CUTCHDGUE FREE LIBRARY, 27550 Main
Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Special Excegtion to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Section 100-30[B)[6] for ~ermission to establish
library ~se for an addition proposed at premises known as 27550
Main Road, Cutchogue, NY; District 1000, Section 109, Block 06,
part of Lots I and 2.
The Board
persons having
comments may also be
hearing.
of Appeals will at said time and place hear all
interests or concerns of the above matter. Written
submitted prior ~o or during the subjec~
Dated: January 24, 1985~ BY ORDER OF THE SOUT~OLD TOWN
BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
By Linda F~ Kowalski, Secretary
(516) 765-1809 (alt. t802)
Instructions to newspapers:
Please publish once, to wit: THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 1985, a~d
fcrward seven affidavits of p~b!ication to: Board o-~Appeals,
Main Road, Southotd, NY llg71~ Thank you.
TOWN OF SOUT~OLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
SOUTI'IOLD, N.Y.
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
~o~ ~,e~mit ~o ~.~*.:~ ~ ..............................................
¥
. .~_ . :. .~. *. . ~. ~ '
~cafion of Proper~v :n~use No. Street Ham/et
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ..... '~ '~ ~ .....Block . ~.~ '. ........ ~t ..............
Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No ..................
is returned herewith and disapproved on the foI!owLng grounds..(~' .~....~..
............................. ~...~ .................
~.¥~.,c~..,.-,,..~. ~.~ ~..~ ~,~~,,~.. ~..~. ~?:~
RV 1/80
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
APPEAL NO. ~3/~
DATE /c~2__ // ..~..~...
Name of Appelta,nt Street and Number
Southold
Municipality
.... ~.t~.: ................ HEREBY APPEAL TO
State
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
dated December 7, 1984, on
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ~ ?...s.u,~.d..i..v..i..d..e. ............ DATED ....$..ep..t..e..m..b..e..r....4.,...1.9..8..4 ................
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
( )
(X)
( )
Rudolph Bruer a/c Thomas Perillo
Name of Applicant for permit
of Southold, New York
Street and Number Municipality State
PERMIT TO USE
PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (vacant land)
1. LOCATIOIx OF THE PROPERTY .5..~..~.~.S.i~.~...k~...°.r..t~h...~.&~...5.g~..~H..°~.m..e~..`P..i.k~?.:~...M"a~.t``t.~i.~t~.u.~c~ ............ ]].A.~.R..e,s./Agr±.
Street Use District on ZOning Map
fl720 fl17, 18, 19 & 20
Mop No. Lot No.
2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.)
Article III, Section 100-31
3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for
(X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map
( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (.State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (t~,s~ (has not) been made with respect to this decision
of the Building Inspector or w~th respect to this property.
Such appeal was ( ) request ~Jpr a special permit
( ) request fir o variance
ond wos made in Appeol No..i .............................. Doted ......................................................................
REASON FOR APPEAL J
) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3
X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
/
) ~
ts requested for the reason tha~ Appellant wishes to divide the subject property into
two (2) parcels. ParcelJ 1 & 2 would have insufficient area, and Parcel 2 would,
in addition, have lnsuff~czent width.
(Continue on other side)'
REASON FOR APPEAL
Continued
1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-
sary HARDSHIP because Appellant would be unable to divide this oversized property
to create two lots of comparable size and shape with the surrounding properties
in this neighborhood. It should be noted that this property originally comprised
four (4) lots (Lots 17, 18, 19 & 20 on "Map of Point PleasantW~ filed 5~17/i6 as
Map No. 720) which have merged through zoning changes in the intervening years.
2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by aH properties alik~ in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this use district because this property is larger than the
other properties in the vicinity (fronting on Home Pike). There are a total of
9 lots along the northerly and easterly side of Home Pike, including the subject
property. The average size of the neighboring 8 lots is approximately 1.495 acres~
the two lots being proposed would each be larger than that average°
3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the lots created would not be undersized in
comparison with the neighboring properties, and each would in fact be larger
than 4 of the neighboring 8 lots.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
///~ f December
Sworn to this .............................................. day o .........................................................
x~j~fdo!ph H. Bruer, attorney tar ~ppe ant
84
~OTA~,Y PU~UC, ~te ~f ~e~v
OWN[R
FORMER OWNER
NEM/ NORMAL
FARM Acre
Tillable
Tillable 2
'Tillable 3
;Woodle, nd
: S'E°mpl'~nd 4
Brushlond '4
H~ouse Plot J
Totol
STREET VI LLAGE
~S
-'z_ x/.o
DATE
BUILDING CONDITION
BELOW ABOVE
Velue
W
Value Per
Ac re
COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value
REMARKS
FRONTAGE ON WATER
ACR,
TYPE OF BUILDING
FRONTAGE.ON ROAD
DEPTH
BtJLKHEAD
DOCK
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOI. D, L.I., N.Y. 11cj71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
JAMES DINIZIO, JR.
March 3, 1989
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appl. No.~31~ - Thomas Perillo
Dear Rudy=
(Variances) Ioeo-II~-I-~
This letter will confirm that the following action was
taken by the Board of Appeals at our Special Meeting held
February 9, 1989 concerning the above application=
RESOLVED, that the improvements as inspected by Chairman
Goehringer and Member Dinizio, to the existing right-of-way
extending from Westphalia Road to the premises of the applicant,
Thomas Perillo, (1000-114-1-7, BE AND HE~Y ARE APPROVED AND
ACCEPTED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE with this Board's decision,
conditions No. 2(a) through (d) under Appeal No. 3317 rendered
February 14, 1985.
This resolution was unanimously adopted.
Copies of this letter are simultaneously being transmitted
to the Building Department and Planning Board for their record.
Yours very truly,
lk
CC =
Linda Kowalski
Board Secretary
Building Department
Planning Board
Southold Town Board of Appeals
- .. . .
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
JAMES DINITIO, JR.
March 3, 1989
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appl. No. 3317 - Thomas Perillo (Variances)
Dear Rudy:
This letter will confirm that the following action was
taken by the Board of Appeals at our Special Meeting held
February 9, 1989 concerning the above application:
RESOLVED, that the improvements as inspected by Chairman
Goehringer and Member Dinizio, to the existing right-of-way
extending from Westphalia Road to the premises of the applicant,
Thomas Perillo, (1000-114-1-7, BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED AND
ACCEPTED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE with this Board's decision,
conditions No. 2(a) through (d) under Appeal No. 3317 rendered
February 14, 1985.
This resolution was unanimously adopted.
Copies of this letter are simultaneously being transmitted
to the Building Department and Planning Board for their record.
Yours very truly,
lk
CC:
Linda Kowalski
Board Secretary
Building Department
Planning Board
Memorandum fromq k ..
Southold Town Board of Appeals
TOWN HALL, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
765-1809
Date: 7/20/88
To: Jerry
From: ~
Linda
d 'er, ! received a telephone
As mentione ear 1
call today from Ray Nine. Mr. Nine indicated
he would like to provide an estimate to
Thomas Perillo for the right-of-way
improvements as conditioned by the ZBA
(for 4" instead of 2-4"), but there is
no indication as to whether a leeching
or drainage basin(s) will be needed.
He indicated that the right-of-way
slopes downhill toward the creek, but
the water runoff would go onto Mr. Perillo's
private property.
Attached are copies of the Board's 2/85
conditions and survey map. (The improvements
also appear to be necessary from Westphalia
Road for the entire length of Perillo's
Minor Subdivision.)
Please let me know whether or not you
feel that drainage basins will be
necessary, or whether you would prefer
to send this over to the Engineers,
Sidney-Bowne & Son [at their hourly rate].
The width of the improvements is for a
minimum of 15 feet -- perhaps the leveling
of the right-of-way could be in such a
way to retain all water runoff as might
be recommended by Ray Nine to alleviate
time delays.
® ,
[59
LONG ISLAND
L
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
JAMES D[NIZIO, JR.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHDLD, L.I., N.Y. 11cj71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
March 3, 1989
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
Main Road, P.O. Box 1466
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appl. No. 3317 - Thomas Perillo (Variances)
Dear Rudy:
This letter will confirm that the following action was
taken by the Board of Appeals at our Special Meeting held
February 9, 1989 concerning the above application:
RESOLVED, that the improvements as inspected by Chairman
Goehringer and Member Dinizio, to the existing right-of-way
extending from Westphalia Road to the premises of the applicant,
Thomas Perillo, (1000-114-1-7, BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED AND
ACCEPTED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE with this Board's decision,
conditions No. 2(a) through (d) under Appeal No. 3317 rendered
February 14, 1985.
This resolution was unanimously adopted.
Copies of this letter are simultaneously being transmitted
to the Building Department and Planning Board for their record.
Yours very truly,
lk
CC:
Linda Kowalski
Board Secretary
Building Department
Planning Board
Memorandum from....
Southold Town Board of Appeals
TOWN HALL, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
765-1809
Date: 7/20/88
To: Jerry
From: Lindaea~rl
As mentioned ier, I received a telephone
call today from Ray Nine. Mr. Nine indicated
he would like to provide an estimate to
Thomas Perillo for the right-of-way
improvements as conditioned by the ZBA
(for 4" instead of 2-4"), but there is
no indication as to whether a leeching
or drainage basin(s) will be needed.
He indicated that the ~i. ght-of-way
slopes downhill toward the c~eek, but
the water runoff would go onto Mr. Perillo's
private property.
Attached are copies of the Board's 2/85
conditions and survey map. (The improvements
also appear to be necessary from Westphalia
Road for the entire length of Perillo's
Minor Subdivision.)
Please let me know whether or not you
feel that drainage basins will be
necessary, or whether you would prefer
to send this over to the Engineers,
Sidney-Bowne & Son [at their hourly rate].
The width of the improvements i§ for a
minimum of 15 feet -- perhaps the leveling
of the right-of-way could be in such a
way to retain all water runoff as might
be recommended by Ray Nine to alleviate
time delays.
Town of Southold
Board of Appeals
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
(516) 360-5513
LEE E, KOPPELMAN
March 22, 1985
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter,
the following applications which have been referred to the Suffolk County Planning
Commission are considered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of
local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval.
Applicant
Municipal File Number
John Bertani & Alexander Koke
Frank A. Field Realty, Inc.
Mr. & Mrs. Robert G. Norkus
Gary Doroski
Robert A. Celic
Estate of Louise Wilson
Joseph & Patricia Stiefler
Cutchogue Free Library
Cutchogue Free Library J~
Mr. Thomas Peritlo ~-~
Mrs. Alice D. Currie
3300
3303
3305
3310
3311
3312
3314
3315
3316
3317
3321
GGN:jk
Very truly yours,
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
by
Gerald G. Newman
Chief Planner
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH R, SAWICKI
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11cj'71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
February 25, 1985
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appeal No. 3317 Thomas Perillo
Dear Sir or Madam:
Attached herewith is a copy of the formal findings and deter-
mination recently rendered and filed this date with the Office of
the Town Clerk concerning your application.
In the event your application has been approved, please be sure
to return to the Building Department for approval of any new construc-
tion in writing, or for other documents as may Re applicable.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call either
our office (765-1809) or that of the building inspector (765-1802).
Yours very truly,
Enclosure
Copy of Decision to
Building Department
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
Secretary
Planning Board'
Suffolk County Planning Commission
J/ Katherine Tuthill- set-off of 11,000 sq.
Cutchogue.
/lo/84
ft. located at .. :j~
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following
a field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals
~/'that the application of ~z Katherine Tuthill be denied since
the lot to be set-off is undersized.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward
It was the consensus of the Board to forward correspondence
from the Department of Environmental Conservation to the
Board of Appeals for their consideration in reviewing this
application. The correspondence states that the Departemnt
requests that all created lots not be less than 40,000 sq. ft.
and they request porposed use of property.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following
~/ a field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals
that the application of Academy Printing for 2 lots on 39,000
sq. ft located at Southold be denied since the lots proposed
are undersized.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
/~ RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following~
La field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals
/~that the application of Thomas Perillo located at Mattituck,
/~for two lots on 3.19 acres, be approved since the creation of
V)two lots from four, as previously subdivided, lessens the
--/non-conformance of the.parcels.. ' ~/
~ Vote of the Board. Ayes. Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, War~,/
Mr. George Wetmore, Mr. Irving Price, esq. and Doudlas P.
Haerlin were present to discuss the site plan for"Tedaldi
Properties". This site plan is to be known as "Tide Mark"
and is located at Greenport, it proposes 47 units on
North Road. Mr. Haerlin who prepared the plan explaned that
the buildings will be set-back brom the road 50' and I ½
parking spaces had been provided for each unit. Mr. Wetmore
stated that there is Village of Greenport water and sewer
on the ~te so he is allowed 6 units per acre under the
ordinance. Mr. Mullen noted that the proposal consists of
24 townhouses and 24 flats and he questioned what a flat
was. Mr. Haerlin stated that a townhouse was a 2story unit
and a flat was a 1-story unit. Mr. Ward questioned the
bluff in the area, and Mr. Wetmore explaned that there ~
ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
TOWN HALL
MAIN ROAD, S.R. 25
SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN, pursuant to Section 267 of
the Town Law and the Pro.
visions of the Code of the
Town of Southold, the follow-
ing public hearings will be
held by the Southold Town
Board of Appeals at the
Southold Town Hall, Main
Road, Southold, New York at a
Regular Meeting commencing
at 7:30 p.m. on THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 14, 1985:
7:30 p.m. Application for
PETER J. AND MARGARET
S. TROYANO, c/o R.F. Lark,
Esq. Main Road, Cutchogue,
NY 11935 for a Variance to
New York Town Law, Section
280-a for approval of access
over a private right-of-way
located on the north side of
C.R. 48, Peconic (along land
now or formerly McGunnigle)
to premises known and identi-
fied as District 1000, Section
73, Block 4, Lot 4.
7:40 p.m. Application of
JOSEPH AND PATRICIA
STIEFER, 6760 Sound Av-
enue, Mattitnck, NY .for a
Variance to the Zoning Ordin-
ance, Article llI, Section 100-
32 for permission: (a) to build
accessory horse~ barn in the
frontyard area and (b) to erect
fencing exceeding four-feet in
height in the frontyard area,
premises known as 6760 Sound
Avenue, Mattituck, NY; Dis-
trict 1000, Section 121, Block
04, Lot 08.
!h:45 p.m. Application for
MAS PERILLO, c/o Ru-
H. Bruer, Esq., Main
, Southold, NY for a
ance to the Zoning Ordin-
, Article III, Section 100-
or approval of insufficient
area and width of parcels in
this proposed division of land
located at Silkworth Road and
Home Pike, Mattituck, NY;
District 1000,' Section 114,
Block 1, Lot 7.
'~ 7:50 p.m. Application for
ANTHONY PAGOTO, c/o
Swim King Pools, Route 25A,
Rocky Point, NY 11778, for a
Variance to the Zoning Ordin-
ance, Article III, Section 100-
32 for permission to locate
inground pool in an area other
than the required rearyard, at
Bayberry Road, Nassau Point,
Cutchogue, NY; District 1000,
Section 111, Block 15, Lot 1.6
(part of 1.3).
7:55 p.m. Application for
ESTATE OF LOUISE WIL-
SON, c/o Wickham, Wickham
...... ~ o e- Main Road.
Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the
Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
a public newspaper printed at Southold. in Suffolk County;
and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch-
man once each week for ....................... ../. .............. weeks
successive[y, commencing on the ....................................
day of ~ ~,.L ~
19 ........
....... ...::.:: ...... .. .....
Sworn to before me this ................................ day of
............. ; .c.v.~.~.~ .............. , 19 ........
Notary Public
BARBARA FORBES
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 4806846
Qualified in Suffolk County
Commission Expires March 30, 19~/~
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,
pursuant to Section 267 of the
Town Law and the Provisions of
the Code of the Town of Seuthoid,
the following public hearings
will be held by the Seuthold
Tovfn Board of Appeals at the
Seuthold Town Hall, Main Road,
Seuthold, New York at a Regular
Meeting commencing at 7:30
p.m: on THURSDAY, FEB-
RUARY 14, 1985:
7:30 p.m. Application for
PETER J. AND MARGARET
S. TROYANO, c/o R.F. Lark,
Esq. Main Road, Cutchogue, NY
11935 for a Variance to New
York Town Law, Section 280-a
for approval of access over a pri-
rate right-of-way located on the
north side of C.R. 48, Peconic
(along land now or formerly
McGunnigle) to premises known
and identified as District 1000,
Section 73, Block 4, Lot 4.
7:40 p.m. Application of
JOSEPH AND PATRICIA
STIEFER, 6760 Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, NY for a Variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article
HI, Section 100-32 for permis-
sion: (a) to build accessory horse
barn in the frontyard area and
(b) to erect fencing exceeding
four-feet in height in the fron-
tyard area, premises known as
6760 Sound Avenue, Mattituck,
NY; District 1000, Section 121,
Block 04, Lot 08.
7:45 p.m. Application for
THOMAS PERILLO, c/o
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq., Main
Road, Seuthold, NY for a Vari-
ance to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article IR, Section 100-31 for ap-
proval of insufficient area and
width of parcels in this proposed
division of land located at
Silkworth Road and Home Pike,
Mattituck, NY; District 1000,
Section 114, Block 1, Lot 7.
7:50 p.m. Application for AN-
THONY pAtJOTO, c/o Swim
King Poo]~ Route 25A, Rocky
Point, N' 778, for a Variance
to the Zon.-.4 Ordinance, Article
HI, Section 100-32 for permission
7:55 p.m. Application for ES-
CUTCHOGUE FREE IA-
THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD
By Linda F. Kowalski,
STATE OF NEW YORK )
! SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
ANNA LEKKAS of Greenport, in
said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is
Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly
Newspaper, published st Greenport, in the Town
of Southold, County of Suffolk end State of New
York, end that the Notice of which the annexed is
a printed copy, has been regularly published in
said Newspaper once each week for ON~
weeks successively, commencing on the 24
dayof January 19 85
Principal Clerk
Sworn to before ms this
dayof ,T~m~ ry
New York
19 85
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN RI~AD- STATE RI~AD ~5 ~BOUTI-tI~LD, L.I., N.Y. 11~'71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Concerning your recent application filed with our office, please
find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice as published in the local and
official newspapers of the Town of Southold, to wit, the Suffolk Times
and the L.I. Traveler-Watchman indicating the date and time of your
public hearing.
Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time specified
in the event there are questions brought up during the public hear-
ing and in order to prevent any delay in the processing of your
application.
If you have any questions, or if you would like to review your
file prior to the hearing, please do not hesitate to either stop by our
office at theSouthold Town Hall, or by calling our secretary, Linda
Kowalski, at 765-1809 (or, if no answer, 765-1802).
Yours very truly,
Ik
Enclosure
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
Copies to the following 1/22/85:
Richard F. Lark, Esq. for Mr. and Mrs. Peter Troyano
Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. for Thomas Perillo
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Stiefer, Box 1167, Mattituck, NY
Swim King Pools, Inc. for Anthony Pagoto
Wickham, Wickham and Bressler, P.C. for Estate
Cutchogue Free Library
Suffolk Times
L.I. Traveler-Watchman
Town Clerk Bulletin Board,and ZBA Bulletin
Individual ZBA files
Building Administrator V. Lessard
11952
of Louise Wi]son
Board (ZBA office)
J UDITIt T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGIS I'RAR O1' VITAL SI ,\l[sFIcS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 11,
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1801
1984
To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
From: Elizabeth A. Neville, Deputy Town Clerk
Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3317 application
of Thomas Perillo for a variance. Also included is Notice
to Adjacent Property Owners; Short Environmental Assessment
Form; letter relative to N.Y.S. Tidal Wetlands Land-Use;
Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department; and
survey. , ~
Deputy Town Clerk
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
September .11, 1984
Mr. Rudolph Bruer
Edson and Bruer
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Proposed minor subdivision
Thomas Perillo
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following action was taken by the Planning Board,
Monday, September 10, 1984.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following
a field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals
that the application of Thomas Perillo located at Mattituck
be approved since the creation of two lots from fou~ as
previously subdivide~ lessens the non-conformance of the
parcels.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
Zoning Board of Appeals
P L~ARD
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
September 11, 1984
Mr. Rudolph Bruer
Edson and Bruer
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Proposed minor subdivision
Thomas Perillo
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following action was taken by the Planning Board,
Monday, September 10, 1984.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following
a field inspection, recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals
that the application of Thomas Perillo located at Mattituck
be approved since the creation of two lots from fou~ as
previously subdivide~ lessens the non-conformance of the
parcels.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
cc: Zoning Board of Appeals
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
APPEAL NO. ~ / '7
DATE ~ x, .,~,.,..~..
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y.
Thomas Perillo f c/o Rudoll~h H. Bruer~ Main Roadx
1, (We) .................................................... o ........................................................................
Name of Appellant Street and Number
Southold .... .N..:.Y..t ................ HEREBY APPEAL TO
Municipality State
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
dated December 7, 1984, on
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT ]gi3, .t..o...,s.,u_b.d..i.y..i..d..e. ............ DATED ....$.~,o.t:.~.~b.~.L..4,...~9.1~.4 ................
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
( )
(X)
( )
Rudolph Bruer a/c Thomas Perillo
Nome of Applicant for permit
of Southold, New York
Street and Number Municipality State
PERMIT TO USE
PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (vacant land)
1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 5~0~0~?:~k~°~r~t~h~&~5~9~.H~.~m~e~P~i~k~e~,~M~a~t~t~i~t~u~c~k~ ............ ~.A.~.R..e.s./Agri.
Street Use District on Zoning Map
Mop No. Lot No.
2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.)
Article III, Segtion 100-31
3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for
(X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map
( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (~ (has not) been made with respect to this decision
of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property.
Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit
( ) request for a variance
end was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ......................................................................
( )
(X)
( )
REASON FOR APPEAL
A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3
A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
is requested for the reason that Appellant wishes to divide the subject property into
two (2) parcels. Parcels 1 & 2 would have insufficient area, and Parcel 2 would,
in addition, have insufficient width.
form Z]B! (Continue on other side)
REASON FOR APPEAL
Continued
I. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-
sary HARDSHIP becau~ Appellant would be unable to divide this oversized property
to create two lots of comparable size and shape with the surrounding properties
in this neighborhood. It should be noted that this property originally comprised
four (4) lots (Lots 17, 18, 19 & 20 on "Map of Point Pleasant", filed 5/17/16 as
Map No. 720) which have merged through zoning changes in the intervening years.
2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate
vicinity of this property and in this use district because this property is larger than the
other properties in the vicinity (fronting on Home Pike). There are a total of
9 lots along the northerly and easterly side of Home Pike, including the subject
property. The average size of the neighboring 8 lots is approximately 1.495 acres,
the two lots being proposed would each be larger than that average.
3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the lots created would not be undereized in
comparison with the neighboring properties, and each would in fact be larger
than 4 of the neighboring 8 lots.
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Sworn to this ..............................................day of ........................................................ 19
) ss ./..
) ~ ,/I / ~gnature
Rudolph H. Bruer, attorney for Appellant
//~ December 84
//'Notary Public ll~Al~/ DP, N~ FOSTER
HOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yod(
No. 524655242, Suffolk County
Commission ~pires MBrch 30, t9
BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
In the Matter or' the Petition of
THOMAS PERILLO
to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold
TO:
NOTICE
TO
ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNER
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: )
1. Tha. Lt.iL.LL~ intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold
to request ~(Special Exception) (Special Permit) (Other) [circle choice]
).
2. Thatthe property whichisthesubiectofthe Petitionislocated adjacentto your property andisdes-
cribed~follows: North by: land of Meskourts; East by: Mattituek Creek: South by:
Silkworth Road & land of Woodburn; West by: Home Pike. The oro~ertv is situate at
Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York.
3. Thatthe property whichisthesubjectofsuch Petitionislocatedinthefollowingzoningdistrict: "A" - Residential/Agricultural
4. Thatbysuch Petition, the undersigned willrequestthefollowingrelief: A variance oermitting a
division of the sublect property, creatinK two (2) parcels,
5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under-
signed are Article III Section 100-31
6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will
be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you ma), then and there
examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1809.
7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the
Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such
hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the
Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the
right to appear and be heard at such hearing.
Petiti ruer, atto.ney for
Petitioner
Post Office Address
Main Road~ P.O. Box 1466
Southold, New York 11971
NAM~
PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF
ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS
ADDRES~S
Mr. Peter Meskouris & ors.
Mr. and Mrs, 3ames Woodburn
69-08 Ditmar8 Blvd.
Jackson Hieghts, N.Y. 11372
60 78th Street
Brooklyn, New York 11209
a: F- ,-41
ST
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) ss.:
Mary Diana Foster , residing at (Not/) McCarm Lane, Greenport, NY 11944
, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the //-~aC~ day
of December ,19 84 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re-
verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective
names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on
the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of-
fice at Southold, N.Y.
(certified) (~J~:m~ mail.
Sworn to before me this ' //
day of/De~ember
Notary Puh'
HELEN M. GATES
~ Public, State of New Yol~
No. 4725686
Qualified in Suffolk County ,~/
~ Exl~ir~ March
; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by
aha Foster
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH APPLICATION TO THE Z.B.Ao
The New York State Tidal Wetlands and Use Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Part 661, requires
an application to the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, Environmental
Analysis Unit, Building q0, S.U.N.Y., Stony Brook, NY 11794, (tel. 516~751-7900), if-
you have checked Box #1 and/or Box #6 below. Please either call their office or
personally visit them at their Stony Brook office for instructions and application
forms. Once you have received written notification of approva please provide our
office with a copy (with the conditions) as early as possible in order that we may
continue processing your Z.B.A. application.
I. Waterfront without bulkheading
[ ]
[ ]
2. Waterfront with bulkheading in good condition
[ ] the full length of the property
[ ] at least 100~ in length
3. Not located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area
[ ] 4.
May be located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area; however,
the following structure separates my property from this environmental
a rea:
[ ] 50' existing road
[ ] existing structures
[ ] bluff area more than 10' in elevation above mean
sea level
[ ] 5. This proposed addition/expansion of an existing building will be more
than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetlands/waterfront areas.
[ ] 6. This proposed addition/expansion of an existing building will NOT'be
more than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetlands/waterfront
area.
[ ] 7.
Please be aware that any and all subdivisions and new dwellings will also require an
application to the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation for their revieW' '
and approval. If you are able to provide them with recent photographs of the
project and wetland areas, it would help expedite the processing of your applica-
tion.
This questionnaire is made to explain the requirements of this State Law and to
prevent any unnecessary delays in processing your application(s).
10/83lk
.]~< SiiORT ~-~z~Rn' ,r:, z
~.,,.v- ...... ,, ,,~. ASSESSML:HI
~NSTRU~CTIOHS:
-- (o) ~n o~dc~ ~o answer ~he questions in ~h~s sho~ EAF $~ ~s'assum~d
Lhat the preparer wili use cur~entiy avoilobie ~nformation concerning
project and the llkeiy impacts oF ~he action. It is not expected that
odditiono1 sLudies, ~esearch o~ other ~nves¢igations will be undertaken.
(b) IF any question has been ons~ered Yes ~he p~o)ec{ may be
sign~icont and o compIeted Environmental Assessment Fozm is necessary.
(c) IF oil questions have been answered No ~t is likely that this
projecl is not slgniP'icant, . -..
(d) Environmental Assessment ....
I. ¥~ill project result in o large physical change · , "
¢o the projec~ site br physically alter more
~han 10 acres of -land? 'YesX No
2. Will there'be o major change ~o any unique or "
-unusual land form found on the site? .......... Yes. X N~
3. ¥/ill projec~ alier or have o large' effect' on -'
existing body of waler? ....................... _ Yp~ x No
4. Will project have a po~en~ially large impact , .
on groundwater quality? ........................ Yes'X'No
flow on adjacent site~?....,e~- :-' .... :' 3':: ' '
............ ~ ... Yes x NQ
6. %'/ill projec~ affect ~ny ~hrea~aned or
d ~ cd pl ~ ~ 1 p i ? Ye X' No
, 7. ¥/ili pro3ec¢ result ~n/o major adverse
on air quali~y? ' ' Yes X No
z . 8. %'/ill project have a major effect on visual
' character of ~he communi¢~ or sccnic vie¥1s or
vis,as known %o:be important ¢o ~he community?.. 'Yes X'No
~. ¥/ill project a'dverse!>' impact any site or ..
. 5~ruc~ure of historic, prehistoric or
paleontological importance or any si~e
dcsignotcd as o critical environmento! area
by o local agency? ............ ~;..--.-;..v.-.-.~.-~..~- Yes X No
10. ¥lill project hove o major effect on existing "
or future rccrcolionol opportunities?. ~ ....... Yes X
11. Y/ill project result in ·major irefific problcms ....
o~ cous.e o major effec~ to ex-isiing
tronsporialion sysiems? ....................... Yes X No
12. ¥~ill pr6ject .regularly cause objectionable
.~ . odozs, noise,' glare, vSbrotion, or e!ectricol
~ ~ dialurbonce aa o result of ihe project's
opcrolion? ' '- --' Ye X No
13. %'/ill'pro~eci have any impact on public health
or.safety? .................................... Yes X No
1~. %/i11' p~o j~ect a r[ ec t th e exi s ti n9 community by. --
'. directly c~usinO o growth in permonenl
population of more ilion 5 perccg[ over o one
year period or hove o major negative elf ecl
.'-' on the charocte~ 7F t.h7 community or
" neighborhood? ............................. Yes X No
i5. Is [here public controversy concerning the
~roject? ...................................... Yes X No
PREPARER'S SIGHATURE
REPP. ESEHT I NG Thomas Perillo
DATE 12/,'//84
no~v Or fOrr~er/y
Peter
/Hesk°Ur/$ et el
:'1
LOCAT~N MA.__P
I'o! i?
I. TOTAL AREA = S.1974 ACRES
~-·= MONUMENT
S. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP
D]~rmoo SECT 119 BLK-OJ-LOT o?
4. LOT NOS. REFER TO "MAPOF POINT PLEASANT'~
AS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF
SUFFOLK COUNTY, SOUTNOLD BK. 5~ P6. II; ON
MAY 17~ 1916 AS MAP NO. ?20
MiNoR' S~BbIVISiON -- -: ¢ ' ' '"
THoMAs PERILLO ' ~ ' - ' '~ .-' ::~.:~
AT MATTCFUCK'
'TOW1M OF SOUTHOLD