The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3183 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTItOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ............................... PLEASE TAKE ~NOTICE that yom' app~cation for ~ Loca,ion of Propo~y. co~,~ ~ax ~o. ~000 S~o,ion .... ~.~ ..... ~o~ .............. ~* .... ~ ........ Subai~sion. ~..~~~..~ ............................................... ............... RV 1/80 TO~VN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Tcw~ ~N-~ ~0,~fb0f~ TO THE ZONING BOARD'OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N: Y. APPEAL NO. DATE ................... : .... I~ame of:Appellont Street and Number ................................................................. : ............ HEREBY APPEAl_ TO M~nicip~Hty kl~t~te WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ....... ................. Nc'me of Applicant for pe[mit ....... ~o..,.~:e. lse, z.......~.. .:....I..~..l, ....... tJoh.e.m.i~ ...... 1LJ.~..u.7. ..t.~ Street and Number /~umcipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ()4~) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ~ PEtg_~IT TO BUILD ~ UOCA'r,oN oF T,-,E P~OPERT'r .~.~..~m.....e.r.~..v.c.....~.~o.r..m,...~.~.,~.~.~.L~.. ................... Street and Hamlet Zone I~. ~.. ~ '*~.¢~...k~;~...~.~... o~ ~: ~f~¢~..~..~..c./~.~.~r~-~& ................................ . x,. f.7.7 2 P~OVISION {S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section ano Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance) Article/7~-- , Section I O-'O3 ._q I '~ l t~_-.Cc~;tec~t 3, TYPE OF APPEAL Appec is mode herewith for A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4 PREVIOUS APPEAL A prewous appeal (has)L(~been made with respect to this decis on of the Building inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for o specie perrmt ( ) request for a variance ana was made m Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ~ ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ~ A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that we would t%rm ZB! (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued I. ~ STR*,'~CT, 4kPP~LICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- soryHAl~B~HiPbecause ~ ID~r2Seq,~ ~'+r-~bC,-'l-tzJ~t ~ ~ ~q. 1s 2 vicinity of this, property and in this use district because The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shored by oil properties alike in the immediate 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CI-IARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because ,~'bL KrOtZV~ CJ ~ Io . Thc ro o ed COUNTY Sworn ,o this .............. ~.......~.'....~.'... ............ day of.....~.~...~..~....~......~... ................ 19 Notary Public TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I~OPERTY RECORD CARD VNER 'RMER-'OWNER STREET N S .~ / C) SEAS. Vk FARM LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE VILLAGE W DISTRICT SUB. TYPE OF BUILDING /'o 0 AGE BUILDING CONDITIOF NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON ROAD 1 BULKHEAD 2 DOCK 3 ~dland mpland hland se Plot 7T' ~ ~ Interior Finish f.,!,/, //; Fire Place H~ Porch I Roof Type Porch/ Rooms 1st Floor Patio [ Rooms 2nd Floor ....... f Southold, N.Y. 1197! (516) 765-1938 November 25, 1987 Mr. Rudolph H. Bruer Attorney at Law Edson and Bruer Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Lot line change for Mary N. Code and Agnes D. SCTM# 1000-76-2-3,4 Nelson Dear Mr. Bruer: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, November 9, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the lot line change for Code and Nelson located at Southold, SCTM# 1000-76-2,3 and 4. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD i S~dloik No "~3998~. ! R~-80o A-C A-C GONIC ~on So thold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI January 12, 1984 Mr. Henry Raynor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matters Pending Before Z.B.A. and Planning Board Dear Henry: The following is a list of those matters temporarily held in abeyance which involve applications in both the Planning Board and Z.B.A. which might be of assistance to you: Walter Hairston - Subdivision at Carole Road, Peconic. Robert Entenmann - Subdivision at L.I. Sound, Mattituck. Clempner and Mandel - Relocation of lot line and elimination of building lot due to proposed mergers. Inlet Lane Extension, Greenport. Linda Miller Faulkner - Subdivision at West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue. Peter and Patricia Lenz - Subdivision a~ L.I. Sound, Mattituck. Carol Plock - Subdivision along R-O-W, North Side Bayview Road, Southold. Frances D. Epp Subdivision at Pine and Maple Roads, Wesland Subdivision, Southold. Patricia Stegner - Subdivision along R-O-W, Private Road No. 12, South Side Main Bayview Road, Southold. ~P~ge 2 January 12, 1984 To: Mr. Henry Raynor, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board John and Frances DiVello - Subdivision off Westphalia Road, Mattituck. (Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C.) Henry P. Smith - Subdivision on the West Side of Peconic Lane, Peconic. (Philip J. Ofrias, Jr., Esq.) (A rY N. Code - Subdivision at Goose Neck Estates, Southold. pplication would have been filed after 1/5/84.) Thomas Yasso - Site Plan for proposed storage building in a B-1 Zone. South Side Main Road, Mattituck. Please let us know if there is any information we can provide from our files which may be necessary in your records. Yours very truly, cc: Building Department GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN b~y ~lnaa ~owa±sK1 lapp Southold Town Board o eals MAIN R{3AD- ~BTATE El-lAD 25 ~rlUTHE]LD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT .J. DOUGLASS .JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI November 15, 1983 Mrs. Mary N. Code 50 Chelsea Ct., Apt. Bohemia, NY 11716 Re: Appeal No. 3183 Variance to Redivide Merged Property Dear Mrs. Code: The following action was taken by the Board of Zoning Appeals at its Regular Meeting held October 27, 1983 con- cerning your recent variance application: RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 3183, application of MARY N. CODE, be held temporarily in abeyance pending receipt of the following: (1) Review and comments or approval from the Southold Town Planning Board concerning this proposed division, and (2) Review and action by the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation concerning this proposed divi- sion and construction of new residence, pursuant to Section 661.5(b) [57] of the Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations. Upon receipt of the above, your variance application will be complete and will be considered for public hearing at the earliest possible date and publication in both the Suffolk Times and L.I. Traveler-Watchman. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call our office. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk cc: Planning Board Building Department JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN C[,ERK REGISTRAROI VITA[,SI\IISIICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 To: October 25, 1983 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 3183 application of Mary N. Code for a variance. Also included is nStification to adjacent property owners; Short Rnvironmental Assessment Form; Letter relative to N.Y.S. Tidal Wetlands Land- Use; Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department; and survey. Southold Town Cler~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK i-.~ r!~-~.A~Cl~[,,~lj FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO.~%~/ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ,, ,~ ..Ele .r..,~.....M....~.~..d.e .................. o, .~o..~.el.~..~,......~.L.~ ~ame of Appellant Street and Number ...... · ............................................................ .......... Municipality THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Votca.~ ! ~9~ d- Ndme of Applicant for p~rmit of ....... .~...0........~....6 IS ~o,.......~...r.....J.~..~.,....~O~ £.~U.i ~L ...... ~..(,,,l..LI.7...I..h Street and Number RAumcipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE (~') PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) PERMIT TO BUILD ~.~..,:P~....~.',..e......IV.'.o.~: ~ c,, ~1.~. 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY. .,...~..~..~L. .0. ................... Street and Hamlet Zone ~F . ...... !.~.~...3 ......... ~..!..~.~.es.~_..~..~..~...~.~... o~.~ /v~op No. L~6t No(/ DAT~. PURCUASED: .~...",. 2. PROVISION (5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article? , Section I~1) - 3 1 ~lk .57~ec/~ TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has)~been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was mode in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ('-~ A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that we would l±ke to Ccr-i~--~.~,t'-- ~ all-/e(x' Fm~n ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because ~ p-I-~l,~ ~'J~-i,~,CC.-~"l. Ox.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because '~ ~ i~ Me ~}cc~-- C~igJrr')c-?r- 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE C~IARACTER OF THE DISTRICT bi, cause COUNTY OF'/I~/'Z'~"'"~L-~I SS ......... ~""-0' ' ..... ' ii .otl;7; ................................. Sworn to this ............... .-~.. .......................... day of.....~-~- ................ 19 ~'.~ Notary Public BOARD OF APPEALS. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of : to the Board of~-~p"eals of the Town of Southold i TO: ~~O~q (~ NOTICE TO .:' ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. Th,~Li~Lk thee intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold torequesta~ (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (Other) [circle choice] ). 2. That the property which is the subiect ~th,e Petitioplis Ioc~a.~ed ad~cen~ t? your property and is des- cribed as follows: /~--.~--~-- .~; ~-~ L~l" I ~/e ¢J, O0 ~CV2qm lC/_ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: $. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article ~ Section I ~-Q - ~ ~ 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road. Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 76'5-].809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: L~, Post Office Address PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS NAME ADDRESS Fk. 35'o 7 STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) , being duly sWorn, deposes and says that on the ~ day of ~ ~ . 1 9 ~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite thor respective name; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current ass~sment roll of the Town of Soulhold; that said Notices were mailed at the United Stat~ Post ~- rice at (~ ~/,;/ ~ ~ ~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (7~) m~l.' - ~ Swor n~to~a~.oz~.me this day 6f .,~..,-/; ~ '~ ,19 tary Public // Wl~ ~ ~t,,;,A L1 rAROTONDO 0 SHORT ENVIROh-M~NT.~L ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short gAF is is assumed that the preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and likely impacts of %he action, It is not ex-oected that additional studies~ research or other investigations will be undertaken,' (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be si~nificant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessarfo (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is no% significant, (d) Enviror~ental Assessment 1, Will project result in a large physical cbmnge to the project site or physically alter more / than 10 acres of land? , , , , · , · · · Yes%/ No 2, Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? , , YesV No 3- Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? , , , , , , Yes b/ No &, Will project have a potentially large impaCo on / gro./nd.~er quality? · · · , · · · · Yes ~/ Nc 5, Will project significantly effect drainage flow / on adjacent sites? · · · · · · · · Yes ~/ No 6, Will project affect any threatened or endangered ~// plant or animal species? , , , , , , , Yes No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? · · · , · · · , · · Yes~No 8, Will project have a mmJor effect on visual char- acter of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? · · · Yes VNo 9, Will project adversely impact any site or struc~- ure of historic, prs-historic~ or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical / environmen~l area by a local agency? · · · , Yes.~_ No 10, Will project have a major effect on existing or / future recreational opportunities? · · · YesV No 11, Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation / 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors~ noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- anco as a result of the project's operation? , Yes~ No 13, Will project have any impact on pub].ic health or safety? · · · , · · , ,., , , , Yes V No 1L, Will project ~ffect the existing community by directly causing a ~rowth in permanent popula- tion of more than 5 percent o~er a one-year period o__r have a major negative effect on the character of the COm. munity CF neighborhood?, Yes No Is there public controversy concernlng the project? Yes ~No PREPARER' S SIGNATLq{E: REPRESENTI:~G: (To~ay ' s -- To: Southo!d Town Board of Appeals Plain Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal Application cf Location of Property: Dear Sirs: In reference to the New York S===~ Tidal Wetlands Land-Use Reculations 6 NYCRR, Part 661, and r~ - , ~ A ~_c~~ 25 of the New York State Environment=l Conservation Law, please be advised that the subject property iQ the '~ w~=h_n appeal application: (please check one box) [ ] ~ay be located within 300 feet of tidal wetiands; , co.s .... t~ along the water-lying edge of this properny is a but.~.~ac in very good condition and at least 100 feet in length.* [ ] May b~ 'located within 300 = ~ of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lying edge of this property is a bu~nead in need of (m~.o~) (major) repazrs an~ a.~p~o.,~ma~_y feet in length. £ ] May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lying edge of this prcpe~e- is bul.~h~ad less than 100 feet in length. May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; and there is no bulkhead or concrete wall existing 'on the premises. not appear to Is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands to the best of my knowledge.* [Starred items (*) indicate your property does fall within the jurisdiction of the N.Y.s. D.E.C.] Sincerely yours, (Sighanu~ please) NOTE: If proposed project falls wit~kin [Y.E.C. jurisdiction, approval must be received an.d submitted to our office before your application can be scheduled for a public hearing. 'aS 89 h'IAP OF '" ...... '~: ...... PIz£)PU:~ E: ~ L I NfE CHANGE B A'¢",, ,/ RECEIVED BY SDUTHOB TOWN PLANNING BOARD SEP 18 1987 DATE