Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3611 Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 2.5 SOUTHOLD. L.I., N.Y. 11¢JT1 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 36]] Application Dated January 29, ]987 TO: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Edson & Bruer as Attorneys for MR. AND MRS. Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RAYMOND KERESTER At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on April 23, ]987, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [×] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section ]00-3], 8u]k Schedule [ ] Request for Application of RAYMOND AND ELEANOR KERESIER for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient lot width of three parcels, each containing 4.6± acres, in this pending minor subdivision. Location of Property: West Side of Pradise Point Road and north side of North Bayview Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-81-1-25. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 5, 1987 and April 2, 1987, at which time the hearing was concluded, in the Matter of the Application of RAYMOND AND ELEANOR KERESTER, Application No. 3611; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a described parcel of land con- taining a total area of 13.85 acres which extends from the north side of North Bayview Road and the west side of Paradise Point Road, Southold, Town of Southold, and is more particularly desig- nated on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 81, Block 1, Lot 25. The entire premises is vacant at this time. 2. By this application, appellants request a Variance from the Provisions of Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code, for approval of: (a) the insufficient lot width of proposed Lot No. 1 of 150 feet; (b) the insufficient lot width of proposed Lot No. 2 of 150 feet, and (c) the insufficient lot width of proposed Lot No. 3 of 150 feet, and frontage along North Bayview Road of 169.42 feet. Lot No. 3 as proposed is a corner lot as defined by Section lO0-13-Definitions of the Zoning Code. DATED: April 23, 1987. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) OF APPEALS Page 2 Appeal No. 3611 Matter if RAYMOND AND ELEANOR KERESTER Decision Rendered April 23, 1987 3. Each of the parcels as proposed will contain a minimum lot area of 4.5 acres (inclusive of right-of-way and low contour areas), and new construction will be regulated by Column A-80 of the Zoning Code. 4. Records show that the subject 13.85-acre parcel is owned by Eleanor M. Kerester and Jamal Manassah (Deeds at Liber 9310 cp 548 dated November 22, 1982, and at Liber 6823 cp 40, dated October 9, 1970). 5. The amount of relief requested as to the lot width of each proposed parcel is 25 feet, or 14% of the requirements. 6. It is noted for the record that: (a) Permit #10-86-1817 was issued January 2, 1987 by the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Conservation concerning this subdivision; however, any proposed development will need an additional application to and approved by the NN.Y.S.D.E.C. Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection; (b) an application for subdivision approval is pending with the Southold Town Planning Board, whose preliminary comments were received February 11, 1987; (c) approval was received December 16, 1986 from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services concerning this subdivision. 7. It should be understood that the actual "building envelopes" as shown on the survey plan amended April 2, 1987 are not part of the approval in this variance application and therefore is not to be automatically considered acceptable building areas. One of the main concerns in these areas is full protection of the wetland and pond areas, and the position of the right-of-way to Lots 1 and 2 should be located in an area distant from wetland areas. In considering this appeal, the board also finds and determines: (a) the percentage of relief requested is not substantial in relation to the requirements; (b) the circun stances of the property are unique; (c) there will not be a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood; (d) the relief requested is not unreasonable and there is no other method feasible for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (e) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the grant of this variance; (f) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering al the above factors, the interests of justice will be served b allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance from the Provisions of Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Code for the insufficient lot width of proposed Parcels 1, 2 and 3 at 150 feet, as shown by plan amended April 2, 1987 by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. in the Matter of RAYMOND KERESTER, Application No. 3611, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No disturbance of any freshwater or saltwater wetlands or wetland grasses defined by Chapter 97(13) of the Town Code, for road construction, development, or any other activities; 2. No lot-line changes or adjustments without formal applications to the Board of Appeals and the Planning Board. 3. This variance is temporary for a maximum period of two years, EXCEPT where the pending division of land has been finalized by all involved agencies and the parcels have been transferred by deed or other legal document to reflect the subdivision lot lines accordingly. ]4. Planning Board Subdivision and 280-a Approvals. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk C~ NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold~ the following public hearin!gs will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at thie Southold Town Halt, Main Road, Southold, NY at a Regular Meeting, THURSDAY,' MARCH'5, 1987 at the following times: 7:35 p.m. Appeal No. 3590 - THOMAS AND CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN (Recessed from 2/5/8~). Addition to nonconforming dwelling strucsure exceeding 50% of fair value. 265 Rochelle Place,'- Mattituck, NY; 1000-144-04-9 & 8. - - 7:40 p.m. Appeal No. 3603 JAMES CROSS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, for ,approval of insufficient lot area (78,408 sq. ft.) of parcel proposed to be set-off'--in this pending division of land. Location of Property: North Side of Main Road, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 109, Block l, Lot~-8.5. 7:45 p.m, Appl. No. 3610 - CAROL A. BARTHOLOMEW. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance for permission to establish "Bed and Breakfast" use, incidential and subordinate to the proposed single-family dwelling use, in accordance with the requirements'of Article !I~, Section 100-30(B)[16]. Location of Proper~y:~-7015 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 107, Block 5, Lot 4~ 7:50 p.m. Appeal No. 3612 PHILIP AND ELLEN BELLOMO. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to construct addition at-rear of dwelling with an insufficient setback from wetlands along Great Pond at 7455 Soundview Avenue, South~ld, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 59, Block 6, Lot 8. 8:00 p.m. Appeal No. 3511 KAPELL REAL ESTATE INC. and LIMPET CORP. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31~, Bulk Schedule for approval of insufficient (l~ lot area, (2) lot width, (3) lot depth of two parcels in this pending division of land. Location of ProperTy: Linett and Brown Streets, Greenport; Greenpor~ Driving Park Map, Lots 16 and 65; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 48, Block 3, L~t 25.1. Page 2 ~ Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals R6gular Meeting - Mar~h 5, 1~.87 8:05 p.m. Appeal No. 3608 RICHARD F. MULLEN, JR. Variance to the Zoning Ordinanc~ Article XI, Section lO0-112[I) for per- mission to'utilize subject premises for a paved parking area~for the employees of Mullen Motors, an established business abutting this parcel alon~g the north side. Zone Districts: Partly "A" Residential and Agricultural and "B-I" General Business. -'Location of Property: East' Side of Cottage PT'ace, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Distriict 1000, Section 62, Block 3, Lot 19. 8:10 p.m. Appeal No. 2592 BENTE SNELLENBURG. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articles: (1) XI, Section lO0-119.1(B) for appr6val of e!ght-foot-heign~ of fencing along the easterly -- property line a length-of 72± feet; (2) XII, Section 100-141, Appea~ing the November 6, 1986 Older to Remedy Violation which mandates a building permit-for new'fencing along the easterly property line. Location of Property: Private right-of-way extending off of the east side of South Harbor Road known as Private Road No. 10, or Old Woods Path, Southold~ NY; County Tax Map Parcel No~ 1000-87-2-21. ~ 8:20 p.m. Appeal No. 36~1 RAYMOND AND ELEANOR KERESTER.\ Variance to the Zonin'§ Ordinance,. Article II~ Section 100-31; Bulk Schedule for approval of insuffici'ent lot width of three parcels,'ea6h'cOntaining 4.6± acres; in this pending minor subdivision. Location of Property: West side of Paradise Point Road and north side of North Bayview Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-81-1-25. The Board of Appeals will hear at said time and place all persons or representatives dQqiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Each hearing will not start before the time allotted. Written comments maya.be submitted p~ior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated: February 23, 1987. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF A~PEALS GERARD P. GOEHR~NGER, CHAIRMA~ Linda Kowalski, Board Secretary FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTItOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ Date.~..%4~...~ ............. 19 .~.'~.. ~o ~,~ .~. ~. ~.~...~... ~ ~,,,~. · .~~.. ~.~., ~.~.~.~ ~ ..... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your applicafio~ dated ~ ~... ~ ~ ........ t 9 ~.~.. Hoaxe ~o. H~mlec County Tax Map No 1000 S~ction , .-. ~.~ J ...... Blbck .... ~ ~ ....... Lot . .~ ~ ........ Subdivi~on ................. Filed Map No ................. Lo~ No .................. ~s returned ;~eiewith and disapproved ~ t~xe following grounds ~.~. ~ ~. ~ ~ .'. ~.~. ~. ~~..~ .................................................... .......... Building Inspector JAN-29 1987 T~,~'I ~.~A~ FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTflOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL ND DATE 1/2~/87 TO THE ZONING BOARD Q~ APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. l, (We) ....... ..P~..~.YI~....~.~....~S.~ .......................... of 21 OI~OLE AVd3NUE Name of A~pell~ Street and Number BRC~TqIT ,T ,E N . Y~r' ............................ HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT~[ ..... ~..~.,~..~. ............. DATED ............. .]:/..6./8.7. ............................ WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) Name of Applicant for permit of Main Road, Southold, N.Y. Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (X) PERMIT TO SUB-DMDE PROPERTy 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 11535 North Bayv.i. ew Road "A"-Residential/Agricultural Street Use District on Zoning MOp Eleanor M. Kerester SCTM~ 1000-081-01-025 Cn~rpn~ Owner Jamal Manassah Mop No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordi.nance.) Article III, Section 100-31 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCEto th~Z0ning Ordinance or Zoning Map { ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4_ PREVIOUS APPEAL A prev,ous appeal ~ (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for c variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated .................................................................... ( ) (X) ( ) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 250A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ~s requested for the reason that Appellant desires, to subdivide this 13.85 acre parcel to create tkree 4.6-~ acre lots with insufficient width. Perm ZBI (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or urineces- sary HARDSHIP because Appellant would be unable to subdivide the property as proposed. alternative configuration of three (or more) lots on this parcel necessitate extensive road construction and impose a financial hardship upon your Appellant. Any would 2. The hardshJ~createdis UNIQUEQnd isnotshared by oil prope~ies alike in the immediate vicinit~ of this property and in this use district because The dimensions of the property make this hardship unique. Although the existing parcel contains 13.85 acres, it is only 450 feet wide. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because Appellant desires to conserve open space by proposing the creation only three building lots on this parcel~ thereby enhancing the character of the district, as well as observing the spirit of the ordinance. This parcel could conceivably, and in accordance with current zoning, support up to twice the number of building lots proposed, without the need for a zoning varzance. Such a proposal would effectively increase both density and demands on ground water supplies, while depleting available open space. of STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COU ',ITY OF SOPFOLK ) Sworn to this .. 28~ch day o~ F NOTARY PUgLiC. S!ate of Ne~z Yo~¢ Gommission Expl:es ,~;i~rch 30,