The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3252Orien~ ~ NY ~ JOHN CHAP~LES #3252 FI~E~: 6/21/8~ Set-o££/insu££. area FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUT}IOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date ... } .....°.J3.' ............... 19 9..!.. File No ................................ vo .. ~-': c~.~.~%~ '~.6 J 4 .~ t~.: ........ L ' J~ ~ ~ ~ , - t Location of Prope~y ............................................................... House No. St~et Hamlet County Tax Map No. ]000 Section ... ~. J. ~ ..... Block ...... [ ....... Lot .... ~ ....... Subdivision ........ ~... ~... Filed M~p No ................. Lot No .................. is returned he.with and disapproved on the following ~ounds .LJ~-. .................... ................................................... ........... ; m~ ~,~..!.,..a,~ .'~ .~(~ ~ ........................................ B~d~g Inspector RVIlSO ,'OWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK t984 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE 5/22/8¢ TO'THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ~ (We) J.~ha~las..~.~....S~e&je~ki..: ...... of P..,O.....B. o3s..5,&2..~a~q_.~.ad. ...................... - - Name of Appellant Street and iN Jmoer .......... .,Qr.~..~,..e,.n...¢,...~.,:. ............................................................ N..e.~...,Y...q.~..k. ......... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION O? THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: 5/4/84 FOR: permission ];o set-off property WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) J ohr~...k., ...¢b.~.;~ 1.~.~..~..~[~,ry.~'Le...51 c~.j .~.a k£ Name of Applicant for permit of ~. 0 :,..~.9.:f...~.,~ .2.. ~aZ..~....~.~.:....0,.,z?.Z.,e.,~.,.¢.,.....~.:.,.~.:....1,~1.,.Q~..?, ........ Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD I LOCA-TtON OF '/HE PROPERTYM~iz~:;Rd~...O~i~'~.~...~T...Y .......... :..Agmimul.tur. al.-.t~as±dential . - Street and Hamlet Zone ....... ~ qQg.._.Q.1,.gr..1.r.,2., OWNER (S): . g]h.~.r..Z.e.s..-..S.Z.e~ .e.8~.&..'... Mop No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragra.ah of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not auote the Ordinance ) Article TTT , Section 3. T;fPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ') A--VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York To~n Law Chap, 62 Cons. Laws Art. I6 Se~. 28C Subsection 3 . . 4. PREVI'OUS' APPEAL 'A previous appkal (13L~) (has not) ~een maae with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect ~o this property. Such appeal was ( ~ request for o special permit ( ) request for a variance ana was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ~x, A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that we would like to obtain relief from bulk and parking requirements in order to set-off a parcel of land. This would create vwo parcels, one containing 80,000 sq.ft., and the remaining parcel with two existing dwelling units con~'aining 135,622 sq.ft. Form (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL .... Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficultiesarunnece~ sa~ HARDSHIP becau~ the appellants would be placed at a unfair economic disadvantage. Due to size, this parcel does not qualify for agricultural tax abatement. In addition, because of it's size this property does not lend itsel~ to the application of modern farming techniques. Furthermore the appellant~ have already suf~fered substantial economic loss due to upzoning. When this property was purchased the zoning requirements were ¢0,000 sq. ft. for a residential lot. Although time and money were expended the application for a manor subdivision was not submitted in time To qualify under Article III section 100-31.1 from the code of the ToWn of Southold. 2. The hardship creafed is UNIQUE and isnotshared by all prope~ies alike in the immediate v~init~ ofthis property and in this use district because the majority of the surrounding homes and lots are situated on parcels containing 40,000 sq.ft, or less. The remaining l~r~e parcels Sf land contain far in excess of 4.95. acres and therefore qualify for agricultural tax abatement. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the O~inance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because this area is zoned agricultural-residential. The proposed lots will be greater in size than the nearby residential properties and therefore will conform to the existing use in this area. The set-off parcel will contain 80.9000 sq.£t, and the remaining parcel with two existing dwelling units will contain 135,622 sq.ft.. STATE OF NEW YORK. ) ~ ~ ('~i ,/ ,~ ) ss COUNTY~ ) Sworn tc this ..... ELIZABETH ANN NE~U.E NOTARY PUBLIC, ~e of New No. 52-8 ].25850, ~uffolk T~za Ex~ire$ Uarch 30. ~:9..~- OWNER TOWN Oi: :~OUTHOLD STREET ,RES. ,~/0 SEAS. VL. S FARM LOT ACR.. ~,/, 9.** TYPE OF BUILDING COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL b o o 70 0 /~ REMARKS AGE BUILDING CONDITION NORMAL .BELOW ABOVE NERA/ FARM Tilldble 2 ' Woodland Acre Value Per Acre Swampland Brushlond House Plot Total Value FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEP~TH BULKHEAD DOCK Extensi°n._.t Ext. Walls ~_~, :~u~ r~ ( Interior Finish Type Roof Rooms ]st Floor_ Recreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floo F~N B Porch Porch Breezeway Garage Patio Total Driveway Southold Town Board of Appeals -25~ April 2, 1987 Regular Meeting (Updated Review, Appeal No. 3581 DAMIEN, continued:) RESOLVED, to reaffirm the Board of Appeals' position concerning the pending application by Mr. Damien with the Suffolk County Depart- ment of Health Services, and incomplete ZBA file. The Board further reiterated that upon receipt of Article 6 approval, we will be in a position to continue his ZBA application and a public hearing. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted. UPDATED REVIEW: File No. 3542-SE TIDEMARK/CLIFFSIDE ASSOCIATES. The Board members are in receipt of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement submitted March 20, 1987 by the applicant's attorney. Also received March 10, 1987 is a copy of the Water and Sewer Contract with the Village of Greenport signed by the applicant and expected to be signed by the Village in the near future (per Henry Raynor, agent). The Board concurred with the Planning Board's recent designation as lead agency under SEQRA concerning the site plan of the Amended Project for the 76 motel units. It is the Board's opinion that the site plan elements, including parking, drainage, curb cuts, screening, egress, ingress, etc. will require a broader review since it affects the land and construction directly. The Special Exception review is for the use and is not directly related to new construction or site changes. The Board indicated they would like to coordinate with the Planning Board closely on this matter, particularly the issues concerning traffic safety along the Main Road (exiting and entering). To date, action by the Suffolk County Health Department concerning the applicant's pending application has not been submitted, but Mr. Raynor said he would keep us advised of developments since that application has been pending for quite some time. COURT DECISION: WETLAND AREAS/INCLUSIVE AS LOT ~REA FOR LAND DIVISIONS. The Chairman advised the Board that he has recently spoken with the Town Attorney, Robert W. Tasker, con- cerning the inclusion of wetland areas or lands under water in proposed or pending subdivisions. The Chairman said he was advised that the Town cannot delete the wetland or land under water when calculating the area of lots in pending divisions or proposed divisions of land. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Messrs. Sawicki and Douglass, it was Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- April 2, 1987 Regular Meeting (Wetland Areas/Subdivisions, continued:) RESOLVED, that the Board of Appeals hereby concurs with the recent Opinion of the Town Attorney, and February 19, 1987 Memoran- dum of the Southotd Town Building Inspector, that wetland areas cannot be deleted when calculatin~ the area of lot~) in pend~ or proposed divisions of land, and it was further RESOLVED, that following pending Appeal No. Appeal No. Appeal No. Doyen, the applicants or agents files be notified of the above 3252 - John Charles and Maryann 3299 - Doug_~_~ss Miller; 3214 - Hanauer and B~. . ~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Douglass and Sawicki. This in each of the action accordingly. Sledjeski; Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, resolution was duly adopted. NEW FILES FOR REFERRALS, ETC. seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was On motion by Mr. Douglass, RESOLVED, that additional information or referrals be processed concerning the following matters as soon as possible (as noted below): Appeal No. 3620 THOMAS BALL. Referral to Soil and Water Conservation District; Appeal No. 3621 MICHAEL S. GILLILAND. Referral to Soil and Water Conserva.tion District; Appeal No. 3622 C.B. SALMI~EN. Await DEC, Trustees approvals or action. Request placement of flagged construction area as proposed. Referral to Soil and Water Conservation Distrfct. Appeal No. 3602 - MARGARET McNAMARA. Await N.Y.S.D.E.C. action. (Trustees action received.) Appeal No. 3543 - PETER AND BARBARA HERZ. Receipt of Trustees action. Referral t~ Soil & Water Conservation District, request flagging of proposed construction areas and completion of amended ZBA questionnaire. Photographs needed. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN I~OAD' STATE ROAD 2S S{]UTHOLD, l.l., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765 1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWtCKI July 20, 1987 George A. Boehling, Esq. 584 Front Street Hempstead, NY 11550 Re: Redivision of Land - John Charles and M. Sledjeski Location of Property: Narrow River and Main Roads, Orient County Tax Map No. 1000-19-1-2 (4.95~ acres) Dear Mr. Boehling: This letter is in response to your July 14th letter which was received today concerning the above premises. In researching the files, we find the following: (a) the set-off application before the Planning Board was denied for the reasons noted in their April 4, 1984 letter. (b) the Notice of Disapproval dated May 4, 1984 from the Building Department with regard to authority by the Planning Board to approve set-off divisions of land is not incorrect and was based on the survey prepared Febru- ary 27, 1984 by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. (c) our April 15, 1987 letter confirms the status of the variance application requesting relief under Article III, Section 100-31 of the Zoning Code. In order to try and assist you as to the Town's positions on this project, we make the following notations and sugges- tions: Page 2 - July 20, 1987 To: George A. Boehling, Esq. Re: John Charles and MaryAnn Sledjeski Premises It appears that since there is an existing nonconforming use on the entire 4.95+ acres for the two dwelling structures and dwelling uses, that a proposal for a third dwelling unit to be set-off from the 4.95± acres will require action from the Board of Appeals under Article III, Section lO0-30(A) and/or Article XI, Section 100-118 as mentioned in our previous letter. The Code requires a minimum of 80,000 sq. ft. per lot, not to exceed one dwelling on each lot. In the event that applicants choose to eliminate one of the two existing dwelling uses in order to apply for the set-off for the future construction of a new dwelling, rather than a third dwelling use, a variance does not appear to be necessary. It is suggested that the applicants submit a con- firmation of their position to the Building Inspector (as the enforcing agent of the zoning regulations) identifying the uses as exist and as proposed: (a) If the applicants choose to eliminate the present nonconforming uses of both dwellings by retaining only one single-family use for each proposed lot, variances are not necessary for the set-off division, and although Planning Board approval is still necessary; OR (b) If the applicants do not choose to eliminate the present nonconforming use of the entire 4.95 acres and wishes to proceed to increase the density, approvals should also be necessary by this Board under Sections lO0-30(A) and 100-118 of the Zoning Code. In the e~ent the applicants wish to proceed with (b) above, you should follow these steps: (1) apply to the Building Inspector for his review and determination (by Notice of Disapproval) confirming the Articles and Sections of the Code applicable; (2) apply to the Board of Appeals for the relief required. You may either complete Form ZB1 by inserting the amendments on both sides, and re-send the Notice to Adjacent Owners Form, OR submit a new application package. Be sure to insert the new Sections of the Code you are appealing or varying on all forms, etc., and refer to Appl. No. 3252. No additional filing fee is required (no public hearings have been held on the previous request under Appl. No. 3252). Page 3 July 20, 1987 To: George A. Boehling, Esq. Re: John Charles and MaryAnn Sledjeski Project (3) contact the Planning Board for the documents necessary for set-off approval. (765-1938) (4) submit copies of the County Health Department approval, copy of Certificate of Nonconforming Premises [available through the Building Department], copy of new Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, and maps showing all present and proposed uses, when submitting documentation to the Planning Board and Zoning Appeals Offices. We are transmitting copies of this letter to the Planning Board (765-1938) and to the Building Department (765-1802) together with copies of your July 14th letter, Please feel free to contact any of the above offices directly. Please do not hesitate to call at any time if there are questions pertaining to the application for a variance through the Board Secretary, Linda Kowalski. Yours very truly, CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Enclosures (Forms) cc: Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Department Planning Board Administrator iNFORHATION .~oiIcEIu[I,qG OF LA,ID (Set-ufJs, Hlnor Lots under 40,000 sq. ft. in area amid not on an official subdivision 1. Article VI, subdivision approval from tile Suffolk County Oepartment of Health.(548-3327 or 3318 or 3312 for informat: 2. Southold Tot.m Planning Board approval for a set-off or minor subdivision' approval.i/f5-1938 for applications); 3. $out. hold Toun Zoning Board of Appeals variance(s).(765-18091 All lots withln 300 of t. tdal ~vetlands and ~'lateruays; 1. N.¥.S. Depart,lent of Envtron,lenCal Coosurvatioo subdivision · approval (751-7900 for applications and infor,lation). Subdivisions', set-Oft's, or 'site plans require SouLhold To,.in Planning Board approvals (765-1938 After al1 approvals have been received: 1. So~thold Town'gulJding Department Occupancy for each Jo~ for CurLi ~icatc.; of Lots over 80,000 sq. ft. in area and over 175 ft. 1. Southold To~.m Planning Ilea rd approval. Lots over 40,000 sq. ft. may or may not be subject Lo Suffolk C[;unty IIcbll. h IJepartme'n"~., Article VI approv,~l. Pleas: ch,~c'l: uith Lin, ir ageucY (5'18- 3327). A11 Jots under 80,000 sq, fl. in a)'e,~ and ..der l. Southold Toun Board of Appc,~ls al)Proval Z. 171.~ I~.. loc ',tidLh.: 3. Southold Toun I]uildjn9 I)ep,',r~.i,..,nL, iS:;u,::,ce ul' Certll ic,~Les of Occupancy (265-IOOZ). (765-1U09); Sou~hol'd Town Plahning l~oard api)r,val ~ ( § 100-119 SOUTtt)LD CODE § Iu0-1192 § 100-119. Corner lots. IAmended 2-1-83 by L.L. No. 2-19831 On a corner lot. front yards are requ?ed on both street front- ages. and one I1~ yard other than the front yards shall deemed to be a rear yard. and the other or others, side yards. No obstruction to vision exceeding thirty (30) inches in height above curb level shall be erected or maintained at street intersections within the triangle formed by the street lines of such lot and a line drawn between points along such street lines thirty I301 feet distant from their point of intersection. § 100-119.1. Fences. walls and hedges. [Amended 5-29-73:2-1-83 by L.L. No. 2-1983] Subject to the provisions of § 100-119, fences, walls, hedges or other live plantings within five (51 feet of the property lines may be erected and ma~nt~ubject "~ ' ' to the following hmght limitations: A. When loca~d in the front yard along the front yard property ~Ane, the same shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. B. When located along side and rear lot lines, the same shall not exceed slx and one-half 16~ :1 feet in height. C. When located other than in the front yard area or along side or rear lot lines, the same shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height. 1~§ 100-119.2. Building setback from water bodies and wetlands. ~"J~ded 3226-S~y L.L. No. 4-1985] Notwithstanding any other provisions of t~is chapter, thc following setback requirements shall apply to all buildings located on lots ad- jacent to water bodies and wetlands: A. Lots adjacent to Long Island~ound. All buildings located on lets adjacent to Long Is!and Sound, and upon which there exists a b',uff or bank landward of the shore or beach, si,all be set back not less § I0g-119.2 ZONING § 100-121 than one hundred (100) feet from the top of such bluff or bank. 12) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection A(D hereof. all buildings located on lots adjacent to Long Island Sound shall be set back not less than one hundred (100) feet from the ordinary high-water mark of Long Island Sound. z~ll buildin,gs locat,ed on lots adjacent to tidal water bodies ( ~ ~'/o~her thar~ ~c, ng Island So'and shall be set back not less than x,,, - seventy-five t75~, feet from the ordinary high-water mark of such tidal water body or not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the landward edge of the tidal wetland, whichever is greater. C. All buildings located on lots adjacent to any freshwater body shall be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the edge of such water body or not less than sevenW-five (75) feet from the landward edge of the freshwater wetland, which- ever is greater. ARTICLE XII Board of Appeals § 100-120. Appointment; membemhip. The Town Board shall appoint a Board of Appeals consisting of five (5) members, as provided by the Town Law. as may be conferred upon it by law, 'e the following powers: (Cont'd on page 10055) I0,13 1.1 '.,. 25 ~s GEORGE a. BOEHLING ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW 584 FRONT STREET HEMPSTEAD, NEW YORK ~1550 ALSO ADM{TTED TO FLOR]DA BAR July 14, 1987 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State Road 25 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer Re: Charles/Sledjeski Dear Mr. Goehringer: Pursuant to your letter of April 15, 1987 to my clients, it would appear that there would presently be no variances required for building on their property, subject to Mr. Lessard's opinion as to any other variance under Art. III, Sec. 100-30(A). I have personally phoned Mr. Lessard on several occasions since your letter of April 15, 1987 but was unable to reach him. I presume my messages were not forwarded to him. I was personally present when Mr. Lessard prepared his memo of February 19, 1987 and he did not indicate, at that time, that there were any further problems with additional variances. However, if there are, please have him notify my office. An Article 78 proceeding was commenced against Suffolk County by my office which resulted in the Health Department approving our set-off (subdivision) subject to certain covenants and restrictions. A copy of same is enclosed herewith. Please advise my office if my clients are to be approved by the Town of Southold on their request or if further legal action must be instituted by my office. Ver/~:uly your~.~,..~. /~Geo~r~e~A. Boehling ? Enclosure ALSO ADMITTED TO FLORIDA BAR GEORGE a. bOEHLING ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW ~84 FRONT STREET HEMPSTEAD, NEW YORK il~O July 14, 1987 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State Road 25 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer Re: Charles/Sledjeski Dear Mr. Goehringer: Pursuant to your letter of April 15, 1987 to my clients, it would appear that there would presently be no variances required for building on their property, subject to Mr. Lessard's opinion as to any other variance under Art. III, Sec. 100-30(A). I have personally phoned Mr. Lessard on several occasions since your letter of April 15, 1987 but was unable to reach him. I presume my messages were not forwarded to him. I was personally present when Mr. Lessard prepared his memo of February 19, 1987 and he did not indicate, at that time, that there were any further problems with additional variances. However, if there are, please have him notify my office. An Article 78 proceeding was commenced against Suffolk County by my office which resulted in the Health Department approving our set-off (s~bdivision) subject to certain covenants and restrictions. A copy of same is enclosed herewith. Please advise my office if my clients are to be approved by the Town of Southold on their request or if further legal action must be instituted by my office. "~eor~e . Boehllng y / Enclosure DECLARATION OF COVENANTS THIS DECLARATION made this,~ residing at 6 ~ - C~,~/~ ~l~c( AND. RESTRICTIONS (2) a domestic or foreign corporation with offices located at (3) a sole proprietorship or partnership having its principal place of business at hereinafter referred to as the DECLARANT, as the owner of premises described in Schedule "A" annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the PREMISES) desires to restrict the use and enjoyment of said PREMISES and has for such purposes determined to impose on said PREMISES covenants and restrictions and does hereby declare that said PREMISES shall be held and shall be conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions: DECLARANT has made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT)___· ...... _ .... · -~r - ~ -~ ~]1~ ~or approval of a subdivision w ~ on the PREMISES. (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 1025~ ?i, 9~ 2. (SPECIAL LANGUAGE TO BE INSERTED HERE -- SEE SAMPLE PARAGRAPHS IN REAR). (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 2 10252 glO0 The DECLARANT, set forth these declarations in its successors and/or assigns shall covenants, agreements and any and all leases to occupants, tenants and/or lessees of the above described property and shall, by their terms, sub3ect same the covenants and Failure assigns restrictions contained herein· of the DECLARANT, its successors and/or to so condition the leases shall not to invalidate their automatic sub3ugation to the covenants and restrictions. All of the covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be construed to be in addition to and not in derogation or limitation upon any provisions of local, state, and federal laws, ordinances, and/or regulations in effect at the time of execution of this agreement, or at the time such laws, ordinances, and/or regulations may thereafter be revised, amended, or promulgated. This document is made sub3ect to the provisions of all laws required by law or by their Drovisions to be incorporated herein and they are deemed to be incorporated herein and made a part hereof, as though fully set forth. (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 3 10252 The aforementioned Restrictive Covenants shall be enforceable by the County of Suffolk, State of New York, by injunctive relief or by any other remedy in equity or at law. The failure of said agencies or the County of Suffolk to enforce the same shall not be deemed to affect the validity of this covenant nor to impose any liability whatsoever upon the County of Suffolk or any officer or employee thereof. These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the DECLARANT, its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities claiming under them, and may be terminated, revoked or amended by the owner of the premises only with the written consent of the DEPARTMENT. If any section, or provision of shall, subsection, paragraph, clause, phrase these covenants and restrictions by a Court of competent 3urisdiction, be adjudged illegal, unconstitutional, validity of these part or provision adjudged to be illegal, unconstitutional. unlawful, invalid, or held to be the same shall not affect the covenants as a whole, or any other hereof other than the part so unlawful, invalid, or (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 4 0252 o Local Law #32-1980 warrants that he gratuity to any official, The DECLARANT represents and has not offered or given any employee, or agent of Suffolk County, New York State, or of any political party, with the purpose or intent of securing favorable treatment with respect to the performance of an agreement, and that such person has read and is familiar with the provisions of Local Law #32-1980. LS (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 5 · 10252 SCHEDULE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY H.D. REF. NO. OR NAME OF SUBDIVISION (Property Description) (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 6 10252 i,104 SCHEDULE "A" ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and desc- ribed as follows: BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Main (State) Road - Route 25 and the easterly side of Narrow River Road; RUNNING THENCE easterly along the southerly side of Main Road along the arc of a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 1604.28 feet a diatance of 356.63 feet to the lands of E. Latham; THENCE along the land of E. Latham the following two courses and distances: (1) South 24 degrees 00 seconds East, 646.00 feet; (2) South 88 degrees 00 seconds West, 355.92 feet of Narrow River Road; to the easterly side RUNNING THENCE North 24 degrees 00 seconds West along the easterly side of Narrow River Road, 646.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. 10252 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ) : ss.: (INDIVIDUAL ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) individual(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that hR(she) (they) executed sams. ~m~M~~S~2~,{{. ~ ...... ~vu...~ Notary Public : State of~New York STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) On the day of , 198__, came , sworn, did depose and say that by me duly No. GEORGE A BOEHUNG ry Public,?ta~e of New Yo~ No "L~ 739§8 ,~__ .Quelifled in N~u (PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) before m~er~na!ly to me knew~, ~o, being he is a member of the Co-partnership of the firm described in and which executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the foregoing instrument for and in behalf of said Co-partnership. Notary Public : State of New York (SCDHS GEN COV 10/86) 8 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 4, 1984 Mr. John P. Charles Ms. Maryann Sledjeski P.O. Box 342 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Charles and Ms. Sledjeski: The following action was taken at the Southold Town Planning Board's_regular meeting of April 2, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the application of Sledjeski/Charles located at Orient since the buildable area of the set-off is less than 80,000 square feet thus creating an u~dersized lot. It was also noted that there are two existing dwelling units on the parcel adjacent to the parcel to be set-off. This house lot should be 160,000 square feet, therefore, it too would be undersized as a result of the proposed set-off. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~/%M. Schul~jze, Secretary ZONING BULl/ AND PARKING SCHEDULE Multiple-Residence 25 25 See Arti. See Arti- See Arti- See Arti- cle .~./ cie VII cie VIII cie IX TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN ItALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 February 19, 1987 TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman ~ FROM: Victor Lessard, Executive Administrator~ SUBJECT: Wetland Areas It is my understanding that parcels containing wetlands, sand pits, etc. for purposes of determining the area of a parcel only, mus~ be included in the ca- culations. The board should take this approach, until such time the State wishes to change its' laws. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHAL.AN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Date We are in receipt of your letter dated ~ ~ /~concerning the above referenced project. ~ J ~l. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. 2. This Department is in agreement with your initial determination. 3. This Department does not agree with your initial determination. See Conments. 4. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. 5. There is no record of an application to this Department. A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map #) This Department has received an application and it is: Complete Incomplete Other: ~/~:~/'7~ 7. It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System Sewer System and Treatment Works Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) Other: COUNTYCENTER 548-3318 Water Supply System A Public Water Supply System Individual Water Supply System{s) Other: Con~nents: The Health Department's primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Article ¥ and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal. These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to state and town wetland requirements. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval. Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to con~nercial development such as Article XII. The Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this for~ to the applicant with its findings. Further cogent may be pro~ided upon c~pletion of the application ~e ~ i ev~. Phone ~ -- ~ ~ Southold Town BOard of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. llg?l TELEPHONE (516) 165 1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI May 21, 1985 Mr. Stephen A. Costa, P.E., Chief Wastewater Management Section Suffolk County Health Department County Center Riverhead, NY ll901 Re: Appeal No. 3252 - John Charles and M. Sledjeski Location of Property: Corner of Narrow River & Main Roads, Orient Dear Mr. Costa: We have an application pending before the Board of Appeals for approval of an 80,000 sq. ft. parcel to be set off from a 3.11-acre parcel concerning property located at the corner of Narrow River Road and Main Road, Orient. Our records show that the property in question is not on a filed subdivision map and appears to be subject to the requirements of Article VI for this proposed division. It is possible that an application has been filed with your agency during 1984. Since this is an environmentally-sensitive area as well ashaving very low contours, may we have your input and comments as to the quality and sufficiency of water and the effects of private sewage systems. For your information we are furnishing a copy of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation comments. Thank you for your assistance. Yours very truly, Enclosures GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN ~Y' Llnd~ KOwa'lski Regulatory Affairs Unit Bldg. ~0, SU~-- ~m ~ ...... '~---'~'~ .... Stony ~ro~,. w~-'lt~ ............. ' ('5i6) 751-79~ Mr. John P. Charles PO Box 342 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Apr~ 24, 198& 1~: Property located on the east sl&e of ~arrow River Road and south of Main Road ~arMr. ~harlesl A review has been made of your proposal to: · Subdivide a 4.95 acre parcel into two lots Location: $CTM NO. 1000-019-1-2 New York State Department of Env/roumantal Conservation has found the __ parcel -- project to be: Greater than 300' from inventoried tidal wetlands. __ Landward of a substantial man-made structure greater than 100' in length constructed prior to September 20, 1977. Landward of 10' contou~ elevation above mean sea level--~_ a gradual, nat- ural slope. Landward of topographical crest of bluff, cliff or dune in ex. ss of 10 feet in elevetion above mean sea level. . Therefore. no permit under Article 25 (Tidal Wetlands of the Environmental ' Conservation Law) is required at this time since the current proposal is beyond State mandated Jurisdiction pursuant to this act. However. any additional work or modifications to the proJecp may require a' per,/t. It is your responsibility to notify th/s office, in writing, if such additional work of modifications are contemplated. Very t~rs, ~iald rkin r(eglo~/al Supervisor of RasuTat ory Affairs ILIL: RRT: cz New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Unit Bldg. 40, SUNY--Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 April 9, 1985 Henry G. Williams Commissioner Gerald Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Property of John P. Charles Dear Mr. Goehringer: Field inspections reveal some differences between what is shown on tidal wetlands inventory map 728-558 and what exists in the field. There is evidence of tidality. The meadow area shown on the survey consists of phragmites and other upland plants. In order for the area to be considered tidal wetlands, a major amendment to our official maps by the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection must be made. Since no map change hearings have been scheduled, it is this office's opinion that the letter of April 24, 1984 remains in effect. Very truly yours, Charles T. Hamilton Alternate Regional Permit Administrator CTH:DWC:co's cc: K. Koetzner D. Fallon F. Mushacke Southold Town Board of Appeals HAIN RI-lAD- STATE RDAD 25 SnUTHFILD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS September 13, 1984 GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHArRMAN CHARLES GRIGON IS, J R. S · E . Q . R . A . SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI Notice of Determination of Non-Significanc~ APPEAL NO.: 3252 PROJECT NAME: JOI{N CHARLES & M. SLEDJESKI This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold. This board determines the within project not to have a signifi- cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated below. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: [ ] Type II [9 Unlisted [ ] DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Variance for insufficient buildabte upland area. LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more particularly known as: Main Rd.~ Orient: NY County Tax Map #1000-019-i-2 REASON(S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: (1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple- mented as planned; (2) Approval has been obtained from the N.Y.S. Department of Environ- mental Cons~vat%on an~/gr the yu~olk, Qounty ~eDa~tment of Health Services. (3) Re±lef requesvea is nov alrecv±y re±area ~o new construction. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Linda Kowals~i, Secretary, Southold Town Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Southold, NY 11971; tel. 516- 765-1809 or 1802. ' Copies of this notice sent to the applicant or his agent and posted on the Town Clerk Bulletin Board. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- $~TATE~ ROAO 25 SOUTHOLO, L.I.. N.Y, 11c~'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONI$, JR, SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI August 20, 1984 Mr. Dennis Cole Mr. C. Hamilton N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental S.U.N.Y. Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11794 Conservation Re: John P. Charles Property: E/s Narrow River Road Your Letter dated April 24, 1984 and S/s Main Road, Orient Gentlemen: We have an application pending concerning a subdivision of land at the above location and identified as County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-019-1-2. Pursuant to recent field inspections, it has come to our attenti, on that there are many fYeshwater marshland plants growing on the property, and that more than 50% of the five-acre parcel is covered in marsh. Also, there are a series of canals and dikes ending in a seaward direction (near Narrow River). Pursuant to a recent discussion with Mr. Hamilton and telephone messages, we ask if a reevaluation could be made concerning this proposed division of land. Enclosed are copies of surveys and map from our file. If additional information is needed, please let us know. Thank you for your assistance. Yours very truly, lk Enclosures cc: Building Department Planning Board GERARD P. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J, DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI Southoid Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11¢J'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 August 20, 1984 Mr. John P. Charles Main Road, Box 342 Orient, NY 11957 Re: Appeal No. 3252 Dear Mr. Charles: After recent on-site inspections of the premises, it is the unanimous agreement of the board members that this matter not be scheduled for a public hearing until the D.E.C. has re-evaluated their jurisdiction, particularly since this parcel contains several freshwater marshland plants. Also, in the interim, it is our understanding that an application will be made to the Suffolk County Health Depart- ment to determine the feasibility of drinking water and septic or sewage systems on the parcel to be set off in this division. We apologize for the delays concerning this application. Please understand that this is an environmentally sensitive area, and a determination must be made as to whether this project would affect the environment in accordance with the rules and regulations of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and Chapter 44 of the Code of Southold Town. Please call and keep us advised of developments. Yours very truly, lk CC: Building Department GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Planning Board CHAIRMAN -9' Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- BTATE ROAD 25 -qOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI July 23, 1984 Mr. John P. Charles Ms. Maryanne Sledjeski Main Road, Box 342 Orient, NY 11952 Re: Appeal No. 3252 Variance for Insufficient Proposed Set-Off at Main Buildable Upland Road, Orient Dear Mr. Charles and Ms. Sledjeski: This letter will confirm that the board has determined the file incomplete pending receipt of the following: Written approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the water and septic systems. US If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to a call. Yours very truly, give GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 4, 1984 Mr. John P. Charles Ms. Maryann Sledjeski P.O. Box 342 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Charles and Ms. Sledjeski: The following action was taken at the Southold Town Planning Board's regular meeting of April 2, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the application of Sledjeski/Charles located at Orient since the buildable area of th~ set-off is less than 80,000 square feet thus creating an u~dersized lot. It was also noted that there are two existing dwelling units on the parcel adjacent to the parcel to be set-off. This house lot should be 160,000 square feet, therefore, it too would be undersized as a result of the proposed set-off. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~v~ M. SchultJze, Secretary TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO~j~ DATE ,,, .5.~..2..2../..~ .4. ........... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 3~ (We)J..~ha~l.es..~..l~....SlecL~e~k± ........ of P...O.....~om..~2..i~air~.~p.~6L ...................... Name of Appellont Street and Number ........... .0...~.~..e,D,.~. ................................................................... ~..e..w.....~...o.?..k.. ......... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED: 5/4/84 FOR: permission to set-off property WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) J o. ha ..P.....ghar. $ry. azaa.e...Sle. j. .a&l Name of Applicant for permit of .................................. Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTYMai~..Rd,...O~ien~,..N...y ............. Agmi~uLtumalv. Rasi.dential Street and Hamlet Zone ....... J~QQrg.).~mJ.r.~ ............................................. OWNER(S): .... Map No. Lot No. DATE PURCHASED: ..J~~19~ ......... 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article TTT , Sect/on IO0-31 3 TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4, PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (I~.~) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such ~ppeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... ( ) ( ) REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance isrequestedforthereasonthat we would like to obtain relief from bulk and parking requirements in order to set-off a parcel of land. This would create two parcels, one containing 80,000 sq.ft., and the remaining parcel with two existing dwelling units containing 135,622 sq.ft. FOrTh ZBI (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL ContinUed 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficultiesorunneces- sary HARDSHIP becau~ the appellants would be placed at a unfair economic disadvantage. Due to size, this parcel does not qualify for agricultural tax abatement. In addition, because of it's size this property does not lend itself to the application of modern farming techniques. Furthermore the appellants have already suffered substantial economic loss due to upzoning. When this property was purchased the zoning requirements were 40,000 sq.ft, for a residential lot. Although time and money were expended the application for a minor subdivision was not submitted in time to qualify under Article III section 100-31.1 from the code of the Town of $outhold. 2. The hardship createdis UNIQUE and isnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because the major±ty of the surrounding homes and lots are situated on parcels containing 40,OOO sq.ft, or less. The remaining large parcels of land contain far in excess of 4.95 acres and therefore qualify for agricultural tax abatement. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because this area is zoned agricultural-residential. The proposed lots will be greater in size than the nearby residential properties and therefore will conform to the existing use in this area. The set-off parcel will contain 80,000 sq.ft, and the remaining parcel with two existing dwelling units will contain 135,622 sq.ft.. COUNTY ) Sworn to this .............. ~ .......... day ............................................. £U/.~BETH ~ ~ NOTARY PUBLI~ StYe d Nm Ne. 52-8125850, Suf~ Tern [xp~e~ March 30, / BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter o~ the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: Edward Latham Main Road NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER Orient, N.Y. 11957 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. Th~e~intention of the undersigned to ?.e~ion the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a ~~e'~fJj[:;~r~jLIr~~ (Other) [circle choice] 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adiacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Suffolk County Tax Parcel 1000-019-1-2 located at the south- east corner of the intersection of Main Rd.(Rt.25) and Narrow River Road. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: Zon~ A Agrieult~ral-Ranidmntial 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: relief from bulk and parking requirements, 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article III Section 100-31 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road $outhold, New York and you ma), then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7~5-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter_by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 5/22/84 Jnhn P. ~ha~la,~ & Ma'~yanne Sl~dj~ki Petitioner Post Office Address P.O. Box 342 M~n Rd- O~ient~ N.y. 11957 NAM~ PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS ADDRESS STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: f'~ r: ,~' ~,,-~' ^1 ~,~,~ ~"O~'~' . being duly sworn, d'eposeS-andsay~sthat onthe~3~.~, day of ~' *~ .... , 19 ~, deponem mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth ~ the re- verse s~d~ he~eo~, d~rected to each of the ab6ve-named persons at the addresses set oppos te thor respect ve name; that the addresses set opposite the names of ~id persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current ~s~sment~oll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- ficeat ~ ~ ~ ~~ (cert'f'ed) (registered) m~il. ' ' ' ' / '~ Sworn to befq~ me this o~ c~rl~ -, day...~.f /V~, -~, 19 ~ -_ ~ ; that said Notices were mailed to, leach of said persons by 7 QUEST!ONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH APPLICATION TO THE Z.B.A. The New York State Tidal Wetlands and Use Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Part 661, requires an application to the N.Y.S, Department of Environmental Conservation, Environmental Analysis Unit, Building 40, S,U.N.Y., 5tony ~rook, NY 11794, (tel. 516-75F-7900), if you have checked Box #1 and/or Box #6 below. Please either call their office or personally visit them at their 5tony Brook office for instructions and application forms. Once you have received written notification of approva please provide our office with a copy (with the conditions) as early as possible in order that we may continue processing your Z.B.A, application. [ ] I. [ ] 2. [ ] 5. [ ] [ I 7. Waterfront without bulkheading Waterfront with bulkheading in good condition [ ] the full length of the property [ ] at least 100' in length {~ Not located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area ~ /~-(~ ,~L~a May be located within 300' of waterfront or wetlands area; however, the following structure separates r,~y property from this environmental area: [ ] 50' existing road [ ] existing structures [ ] bluff area more than 10' in elevation above mean sea level This proposed addition/expansion of an existing building will be more than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetlands/waterfront areas, This proposed addition/expansion of an existin9 building will NOT be more than 75' from the landward edge of tidal wetland$/waterfro~t area. Please be aware that any and all subdivisions and new dwellings will also require an application to the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation for their review and approval. If you are able to provide them with recent photograpi~s of the project and wetland areas, it would help expedite the processing of your applica- tion. This questionnaire is made to explain the requirements of this State Law and to prewnt any unnecessary delays in processing your application(s), IO/831k }'he ~.Y,rr~, [nvlronmenta] Quality R,view l;(:t requires sub~ ,~ission of Lhisd~rm, and ~,l enviromi,el~l,~l .~:viu,, ~, ii be made by this bo~l~ before any actic.;i i,; tall (a) In order tu answer the questions in thi· short gAF is ts ass~ed that tho preparer will use currently available ~forr~atlon concerning the project and the likely i~cts of the action, It is no~ e~pected tha~ additional ~tudie~ r~eearch cr o~her inves~lgations w~i be ~derta~en. (b) If any question has ~een answered Yes the proJec~ may be aigntfican~ ·nd a completed Enviro~mental Assessment For~ is nece~$ar/. (c) If all questions have been answered No i% is likely that this project is ~c,..~ sJgniflcant. (d) F~virc'n~ental Assessment 1. Will project rssu~t in a l&rga ~hysical ck~nge to the project eite or physically alter more t~en 10 acre~ of land? . . . . · , . . . 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? J. W~.!l project alter or have a lar&~ effect on an existing body of water? . . . , . Will project have a potentially large L~pac~ on groundwater quality? . . . . . . . 5. W~ll project significantly effect drainage on adjacent sites? · · · . · · 6. Will project affect any t~h~eatened or endangered plant or animal species? . . · , . . 7. W[ll prcject result in a major adverse effect on air quality" . . , . . . o . Will proJe~ have a major effect on visual char- ac'.er of the community or scenic views or vis~as kno~n to I:,e i~portant %0 the con%~unity? . . · Will project adversely in. pact any site or struct- ,:re of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological importance or any site desig~ate~ as · critical envirommen~al area by a local agency? . · · 10. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? . · . 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a ~aJor effect to existing transportation 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- ance an a result of the project's operation? . Will project have any impact on public health or Will project Affect the existing co.~munity by directly causing a ~rcwth in permanent popula- tion cf more t~an 5 percent over a one--year period o._r have a major negative effect on t~,e character of the oom.munity or neighborhood~. . Tee / No , , Yes ~ No Yes / No Yea J No Yes J , Nc Yes i No Yes / No Yes /' No Xes V No / Yes v No Yes V No / Ye~ ~ No Yes %/ r;o Yes tho project? ,, Yes TITLE: , ' NO ~ r · -~Ul:ll: .C~Tq~e items 1, 2, 3, and 4 ~ ~r ~ ~ fhe "~T~ T0" (CONSULT~ ~STM~R FOR 2. ~ RESTRIC~D ~y TO ~'* 0