Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3920 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 A~ION OF THE BOARD OF kPPEAL$ Appl. No. 3920 Matter of A. LIO$. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, as disapproved, for permission to construct deck additions. Proposed construction exceeds permitted lot coverage, and will have insufficient side yard setbacks. Property Location: 310 Linda Road, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106, Block 1, Lot 14. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on April 19, 1990 and May 30, 1990 in the matter of the Application of A. LIO$ under Appeal No. 3920; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally v~ewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the west side of Linda Road, Hamlet of Mattituck, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 106, Block 1, Lot 14. 2. This is an application for Variances from the Zoning Code Article XXIV, Section 100-244, for permission to construct deck additions. Proposed construction exceeds permitted lot coverage and will have insufficient side yard setbacks. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3920 Matter of A. LIOS Decision rendered May 30, 1990 3. Article XXIV, Section 100-244, A nonconforming lot separately owned and not adjoining any lot or land in the same ownership at the effective date o this Article and not adjoining any lot or land in the same ownership at any time subsequent to such date may be used, or a building or structure may be erected on such lot for use, in accordance with all the other applicable provisions of this chapter, provided that proof of such separate ownership is submitted in the form of an abstract of title showing the changes of title to said lot, which abstract shall be in the usual form, shall be certified by an attorney or a company regularly doing such work in Suffolk county or by a corporation duly licensed to examine and ensure title to real property in Suffolk county and shall contain a certification that no contiguous property was owned by an owner of the property involved since the date of any previously applicable Zoning Law, such law shall be granted relief for front side and rear dimensions as follows. 4. The subject premises contains 10,800+- sq. ft. and contains a one and a half (1 1/2) story framed house with an attached 21 X 14 porch addition approximately 4 ft. from the existing deck which is approximately 6 ft. from the south property line and is located around the 36 X 18 swimming pool which is located in the side yard south of the existing dwelling in this R-40 Zone District, as shown on the survey dated February 13, 1990 by Anthony W. Lewandowski. 5. This Board questions how the swimming pool and deck application were approved by Town Agencies in the sideyard area of this premises. The application is in direct violation of the strict zoning code which does not permit accessory structures (such as swimming pools and decks) in the side yard area. 6. In considering this application the Board finds and determines: (a) The relief requested is not within the character of the immediate area and will be a substantial change, creating other precedents ot follow; (b) the practical difficulties claimed are not sufficient to warrant the granting of the relief requested; (c) the circumstances of this property are not unique; (d) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors the interest of justice will be served by denying the relief requested as further noted below: Page 3 - Appl. No. 3920 Matter of A. LIOS Decision rendered May 30, 1990 Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE in the matter of the application of A. Lios for placement of deck with excessive lot coverage over allowable twenty percent (20%). df GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN RECEIVED AND ~/LED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLk'tRK Town Clerk, Town of Southold APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of $outhold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at a Regular Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971, on THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 1990, at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3926 - MURRAY JACOBS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, as disapproved for permission to construct an accessory shed in side yard, accessory buildings may be located in the required rear yard. Property Location: 1180 Sage Boulevard, Greenport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 53, Block 5, Lot 9. Page 2 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of April 19, 1990 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3927 - MARK AND ELLIE GORDON. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, as disapproved, for permission to construct an accessory building to tennis court located in front yard, accessories permitted in the rear yard area only. Property Location: Private Road #7, Fords Road, Southold, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 087, Block 01, Lot 18.4. BloLinda Road, Mattituck, ck 1, Lot 14. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3928 - SAMUEL AND RACHEL SALZMAN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, as disapproved, for permission to construct addition to an existing dwelling, proposed construction will have insufficient front yard setbacks. Property Location: 65 Old Salt Road and 400 Rochelle Place, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 144, Block 5, Lot 22. / 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 3920 - A. LIOS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, as disapproved, for permission to construct a deck addition to existing pool, proposed construction exceeds permitted lot coverage, and will have insufficient side yard setbacks. Property Location: 310 County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106, Page 3 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of April 19, 1990 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3921 EILEEN VILLANI. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239 B, for permission to construct deck addition to existing one family dwelling, proposed construction will be within 75 ft. of water or wetlands. Property Location: Private Road 925 Wood Lane, Peconic, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 086, Block 06, Lot 10. 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3919 - THOMAS COLLINS. Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239 permission to construct a deck addition to a one Variance to the 4.B, for family dwelling, proposed construction will be less than 75 ft. from the bulkhead. Property Location: 305 Dawn Drive, East Marion, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 35, Block 5, Lot 20. 8:00 p.m. Appl. No. 3930 - JOHN C. PERRONE. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-101B, for permission to occupy and use as a billiard parlor for commercial recreation. Property Location: Main Road, State Road 25, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 122, Block 6, Lot 31. Page 4 - Notice of Hearings $outhold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of April 19, 1990 8:05 p.m. Appl. No. 3914 - EVA HALLA. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, Bulk and Parking Area, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, building setbacks from water or wetlands, for permission to construct a one family dwelling. Property Location: 55 Glen Court, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 083, Block 01, Lot 01. 8:10 p.m. Appl. No. 3922 - ROBERT AND THERESA TURNER. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A.4, Bulk and Parking area, for permission to construct an attached swimming pool to house. Drive, Laurel, County Tax Map No. Lot 17. Property Location: 1525 Albo 1000, Section 126, Block 03, 8:15 p.m. Appl. No. 3925 - ELSIE pARKIN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Bulk and Parking Regulations in this Division of Land. Property Location 7575 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 104, Block 04, Lot 27. Page 5 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of April 19, 1990 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3908 - ROBERT OCHE1FREITER AND EDWARD LENCESKI. Variance for reversal of a building permit to construct a one Road, Mattituck, lot 14. family dwelling. Property Location 565 Bayer County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 139, Block 3, The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Written comments may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not start before time allotted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, Please call 765-1809. Dated April 9, 1990 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRF~kN By Doreen Ferwerda APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to the Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of $outhold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at a Special Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY, 11971, on WEDNESDAY, MAY 30, 1990, at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3920 - A. LIOS. Variance to the Zoning~ rdinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, as disapproved, for ermission to construct deck additions. Proposed construction~ xceeds permitted lot coverage~ and will have insufficient side ard setbacks. Property Location: 310 Linda Road, Mattituck, ounty Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106, Block 1, Lot 14. ~ 2~ge 2 .- Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Special Meeting of May 30, 1990 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3933- PAMELA VALENTINE. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-231 A, for permission to construct an 8 ft. fence in the front yard area. Fence in the front yard area not to exceed 4 ft. in height. Property Location: 34655 Main Road, Orient, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 019, Block 01, Lot 5 & 6. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3914 - EVA HALLA. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, Bulk, Area and Parking, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, building setbacks from water or wetlands, for permission to construct a one family dwelling. Property Location: 55 Glen Court, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 083, Block 01, Lot 01. 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 3895 - ROBERT AND ETHELLE SCHROEDER. Variance for reversal of the building inspector for change o~ use of land and existing building without obtaining a certificate of Occupancy. Property location: 4380 Main Road, East Marion, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 35, Block 5, Lot 4. Page 3 - Notice of Hearings Southold town Board of Appeals Special Meeting of May 30, 1990 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3907 - NICHOLAS ALIANO. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.2 (Article XXV, Section 100-253 A), as disapproved, for permission to construct a retail/office complex, proposed construction is not permitted in this R-40 Zone District. Property Location: 29950 Main Road, 30 Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 102, Block 03, Lot 01. 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3915 - JORDAN'S PARTNERS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71, as disapproved for permission to construct office and retail stores. Proposed construction is not permitted use in this District. Property Location: 1000 Main Street and 160 Main Road, Greenport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 34, Block 2, Lot 1. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Written con~nents may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not start before time allotted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated May 21, 1990 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Doreen Ferwerda FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO'~¥N CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOT-ICE OF DISAPPROVAL .................. ,19 0C'~. Date ~././' ~' .......... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ..... .~. '. ................. 19 ~.~.. Location of Property . .?.,('?. .......... bloose tVo. Street ................ County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .... /.O..6. .... Block ...... .~. ...... Lot .... /(...,~'. ..... Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No ................ .. is re~ed herewith and disapproved on the fo~low~g ground~ .V'~..~...~.~ .~~..?.~.~...~~~: .... ~~..~ ....... .~~...~..~,.~~..~ ~..~..~ .................. ~..~..~....~ .................. Building In~ctor - RV 1/80 Disapproved a/c ..................................... 3nm~ETS OF PLANS ....... FORM NO. I SURVEY .......... TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CHECK .......... BUILDING DEPARTMENT SEPTIC FORM ............. TOWN HALL NOTIFY ~,,OUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 CALL ................ TEL.: 765-1802 MA L T0; INSTRUCTIONS Date ... a. This apphcation must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- cation. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ~, ga ~,o,,,,,~ ' '/]':' .~. .3. ?¢ /. ~. ,. : o%.~.~. . .~. . . . . ........... (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) .. ....... '¥~ ....... ~ ~t A Ig,'~,~,~.~A~tO ~,etiJ~il~ V:~G,* (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is..owner~-~g~41eq, agent architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. ............... -,~'~J~f~ ~ll~g3'a"Jn/t~"t~q ~ ~t~'~'~: · -~ ~.'~7.-..~.v..,-:./.-,~ .......................................... ~)~l~JM~t.~~t ,~ OVIIMA~I:~ -H,~.t~._Z~.~~ ...... Name of owner of premises . .. ,~o.*~o',t t~<.t.-t-.z t .--v... ~-[0.-~' ........................................ t~t¥ ,,'~;T'~.:,?.::,-, '. ~ (as on the tax roll or latest deed) If ~c, antri~.a.~corp~)~,~Ig~,'.~i~fith~fd'uJy authorized officer. /- -1// .."'. ' '? '~ ~r '/~ //' ,.'~ ~, ,; .~ .~ ~~;~;;;). : ....... ALL CQ~qIO~I,S,.~U~T3E SUFFOLK COUNTY LICENSED Plumber's License No ......................... Electrician's License No..~.~{A/~ .~K~..... Other Trade's License No ...................... I. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: . 3/.O...../-../.~./~...~....~ . . .... 2/.0. ................. Z . . ............. , . ,4(.-. ..... House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ..... /.0..~ ......... Block ...... / ........... Lot ...... /..~. .......... Subdivision ..................................... Filed Map No ............... Lot ............... (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: /~.45: r a .~.~..~..~a .... a. Existing use and occupancy ' ' ~:'""- b Inte ded se and occupa cy ' 3. Nature of work (check which applica~l~: New Building ..... ..... Addition~ll~ ........ Alteration ...../ ..... Repair .............. Removal .............. Demolition .............. Other Work ..........~ ~. , 4. Estimated Cost ........ ~.{.)..C~,~). : .................... ~ Fee .................. · (to be paid on filing tlii~ a.pplication) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ............... Number of dwelling units on each floor .... ~'i .......... If garage, number of cars ........................................................................ 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use ..................... 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ............... Rear .............. Depth ............... Height ............... Number of Stories ........................................................ Dimensions'of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ................. Rear .................. Depth ...................... Height ...................... Number of Stories ...................... · 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front .......... ..... Rear ............... Depth ............... Height ............... Number of Stories ........................................................ 9. Size of lot: Front ...................... Rear ...................... Depth ...................... 10. Date of Purchase ............................. Name of Former Owner ............................. 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated ......... ~. 6-~'1Q.L~,t~"./.~.. ........................... 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ....... ~ ................... 13. Will lot be regraded ........ ~ ........... ~ .... Will excess fill be removed from premises: ~ No 14. Name of Owner of premises ./~t2~'.'.~-';~...Z,.Zq-,.q.. Address ../~/~.,92?Z'.~...(:7¢.... Phone No. ~ ~-'~.,.~.,3'.'7'~ Name of Architect ........................... Address ................... Phone No. Name of Contractor.. ~.(j;~:;7..d.g?. ~....~.'.,~--_.~. Address.. ~.~'./~-~-.7./"re~/¢.. Phone No. i .~.~ i ~'.'(~ 15. Is this property located within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? *Yes ..... No~....-' *If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit maybe required. PLOT DIAGRA~ Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and. indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether interior or comer lot. "iMMEDIATELY" ENCLOSE POOL 1'0 CODE LiPON COMRt. ETION $. INSUt..AYION 4. FIN&L CONSTRUCTION ~ BE COMPLLrTE FOR C.O. All CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENT8 ~ THE NY, STATE CONSlllUCTION & ~ CODES. NOT RESIION~BLE FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERROR~ STATE OF NEW Y~RK.. country s.s ff.. ..... ~.,.. being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named. He is the .............. ~~ ....................................................... (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) of said owner or ownem, ~d is duly authored to perfo~ or have perfo~ed the said work and to m~e ~d file application; that all statements cont~ned ~ this application are t~e to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be perfo~ed in the m~ner set for~ ~ ~e application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this ............. . ....... / Nota~ Public ..... County ~EL~ / ~ ~~ ~~V~ . · ..... ~ .... ~ ...... ~ .... /.. ~.~ ........ N~ ~ m) // (Si~a~ applic~t) ~ ~res O~m~ 8, 1~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK RICIlVED APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR ; .(.T~ T~Ht-~ lNG BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 1, (We) .................................................................. of ............................................................................ Name of Appellant Street and Number Municipality ............................ HEREBY APPEAL TO State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED ...................................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO A/oS Name of Applicant for permit Street and Number Municipality State / ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( ) 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ..... ..L../.,.~..~.~ .......... ,,~,,,~. .......... J~.~?,j,~',/,~,..~f,.~',~. ............... Street /Hamlet / Use District pn Zoning Mop District 1000 Sectioning. Block / Lot /4 C'rrent .................................................................................. u Owner ~ /~-/' D ,5 MapNo. /O~ L°tN°14~ Prior Owner 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Arti cl e Secti on ~..,~/~TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith for (please check appropriate box) ( ' ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 () 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) t(~.as not~)been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this prop~-Ry. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ('~'/A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL Contlnu~l OiVll:)lll 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE waufd produce procticol difficulties or unneces- sory HARDSHIP because 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss COUNTY OF ) Signature Sworn to this .......................... ..~...~. ............. day of ............... ~ .............................. 19~ Notary Public HI:'I.EN K. DE YOE NOTARY PUBL C, State of New Yod~ No. 4707878, Suffolk Ceuntyc~/ Term Expires Mmch 30, l-9- L~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PE TY RECORD CA D ~-~' /~,.7~' ,~i OWNER , STREET VILLAGE LOT / 2- "2.-- FORMERo~p~N ER LAND / ltvoI~ /'GOAD N S E DISTRICT' SUB. ACREAGE W TYPE OF BUILDING SEAS. IMP. VL. TOTAL FARM DATE I 600 I 6 o~AGE Farm , miJleble Tillable 2 Tillable 3 Woodland Swampland Brushlond House Plot Total ,Z~'.~ l~er Acre ,o//~oValue 9/'/~16e- ,:zig'l T~ ro- t~1 ~. ~tension ~t. Walls ~00~ ~, Interior Finish ~tens~n Fire Place He~ Porch R~ms 1st Floor ~ Petio Rooms 2nd Flor : BLDG. DEPT. cEN.i'RA L DRIVE Lot I£$ AWD/OH F~OH DATA O~F~NED FROM YOUNG &~YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER .AVlENUE~. RIVERHEA ALDEN W. YOUNG . SURVEY FOR: ECA~E, I" ~ ~d : " GUARANTEED TO; APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Ooehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ~gust 1, 1990 Mr. ~Dbert Bohn P.O. Box 55 Peconic, NY 11958 Re: Appl. No. 3920 - A. LIOS (Variance) Dear Mr. Bohn, Transmitted for your records is a copy of the recent determination rendered by the Board of Appeals concerning your application. Please be sure to return to the Building Department to determine your next step with this project. If you require any further information please contact us at (516) 765-1809. Yours very truly GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Doreen Ferwerda Enclosure copy of decision to: Building Department ZBA/df VICTOR LESSARD PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR (516) 765-1802 FAX (516) 765-1823 To: From: Subject: Date: '.":"-~ ."~{~:~.~'2.~'~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ~ ~m ,i~,~'~'~ P.O. Box 1179 ~:~-~~a~.~ -:~,i~ Southold, New York 11971 OFFICE OF BUILD~G ~SPE~OR TOWN OF SOUT~OLD Zonin~ Board of Appeals.~. Building Depar~ent ~ Appeal $3920 - A. Lois April 25, 1990 I will try to answer your inquires and attach copies to help clear the air. Lot coverage: Property: 10800 20%: 2160 Propose6~ 3554 ' Over allowed: 1394 (90 x 120) 1394 =.65 3554 =.30+ 2160 10800 65% over allowed 20% 30+% lot coverage & 3. Swimming pool permit is still active and not not done as applied for. 4. At present there are some "Orders To Remedy Violations" on this property. A. Construction of a porch without benefit of a building permit. B. B.P.# 10034Z without a C.O. (now obtained) C. B.P.# 8701Z without a C.O. (now obtained) D. Expanded deck with permits. TO~VN OF SOU?HOLD Building Inspector's Office Town Clerk Building-~...~ Southold, N. Y;' 7657266x0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION TO Hr. & Hrs. Andrea Lios (~lwner or authori~:ed agent of owner) 992 Azlee Roaa ~assapequa, N.Y. I 1758 ' (address of OWner or authorized agent of owner) PLF.~SE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance CHAP. I00 Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances--or Regulations ............. at premises hereinafter described in th'at; DECICS AND ADDITIONS UERE CONSTRUCTED 'd'lTHOITl' (state Character of violation) A BUILDING PERHIT AND USED WITHOUT A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. in violation of ARTICLE XXVIII CHAP. 100-281 & 100-284. (State section or paragraph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED?o comply with the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned IHI~IEDIATELY The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 310 LINDA RD., NATTITUCK, N.Y. ................................................................................ County of Suffolk, New York. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX ~ # 1000-106-01-14 Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of Iow may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. ~- O"D N^NCE ............. VINCENT R. WlECZOREK FORS! NO. 5 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Dote AUGUST 17, 19 89 TO Nr. & firs. Andrea Lios (owner or outhoriged agent of owner) 992 AiZee ~oaa ~assapequa, N.Y. 11758 (address of Owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance Other Applicable Laws, Ordinonces-'or Regulations .................. at premises hereinafter described in that DECKS ~ ADDITIONS ~RE CONSTRUC'J:~.D WITHOI~ (state character of violation) A BUZLDING 'PERI/IT AND USED ~/IlqIOUT A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPAIqCY. in violation of ARTICLE ZA¥III CHAP. 100-281 & 100-284. (State section or paragraph of applicable Iow, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED to comply with the Iow and to remedy the conditions above mentioned 'rHHEDIATEL¥ The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers ore situated at 310 LXNDA RD., HATTITUC[, N.Y. ................................................................................ County of Suffolk, New York. SUFFOL[ COUNT~ TAX MAP # 1000-106-01-1& Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions ~f law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. -. ORDINANCE INSPECTOR ........... VINCENT R. [/IECZOP~gl[ ("~ VICTOR LESSARD PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR (516) 765-1802 FAX (516) 765-1823 OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: From: Subject: Date: Zoning Board of Appeals vm Building Department ~ Appeal #3920 - A. Lois April 25, 1990 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 I will try to answer your inquires and attach copies to help clear the air. Lot coverage: Property: 10800 20%: 2160 Proposed: 3554 Over allowed: 1394 (90 x 120) 1394 =.65 3554 =.30+ 2160 10800 65% over allowed 20% 30+% lot coverage 2. & 3. Swimming pool permit is still active and not not done as applied for. 4. At present there are some "Orders To Remedy Violations" on this property. A. Construction of a porch without benefit of a building permit. B. B.P.# 10034Z without a C.O. (now obtained) C. B.P.# 8701Z without a C.O. (now obtained) D. Expanded deck with permits. TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Building Inspector's Office $outhold, { 0 ,' ~{-~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date AUGUST 17, 19 89 TO .... ..H.r. & Hrs. Andrea Lios (Owner ~f authoriited agent of owner) 992 A~-~ee Roaa Naasapequa, N.Y. 11758 (address of Owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance CHAP. I00 Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances-'or Regulations ................. at premises hereinafter described in that .....D..~...C~....S..~.....~...D..I~IONS D/ERg CONST.R.~C'JL~D ~ITHOHT (state character of violation) A BUILDING PERHIT AND USED [/I~HOUT A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. in violation of ARTICLE XXVIII CltAP. 100-281 & 100-284. (State section or paragraph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED?o Comply with the Iow and to remedy the conditions above mentioned I'HHEDZATELY The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 3 I0 LINDA ltD., HAT~ITUCK, N.Y. ................................................................................ County of Suffolk, New York. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX HAP # 1000-106-01-16, Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply wilh the applicable provisions of law may constitute on offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. .. ORDINANCE "~'~ ~ ~.~'~ ~'~ ................. VINCENT R. RIECZOREK APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. serge Doyen,~ Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: ~tictor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Zoning Board of Appeals~ DATE: April 24, 1990 RE: Appl. No. 3920 - A. Lios Together with the public hearing a physical inspection shows that the swishing pool and deck area is not attached to the dwelling. We have several questions we would like answered regarding this application before we can continue with the public hearing. 1. Regarding lot coverage, can you show in writing how you calculated that the lot coverage is 65% over the excess of 20%~ Please indicate a total percentage of all the improvements on the property including swimming pool, deck and house, etc. 2. It is our understanding that the Building Department has not issued a Certificate of Occupancy on the swimming pool, are we correct on that? 3. Why was the permit granted for the swimming pool in the sideyard area? APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 April 9, 1990 Robert Bohn Box 55 Peconic, NY 11958 Re: Appl. No. 3920 - A. Lios (Variance) Dear Mr. Bohn: This letter will acknowledge receipt of your application for a variance and confirm that the Board members are individually conducting field inspections and review as may be required by state and local laws during the next couple of weeks concerning your application. The public hearing on this application is expected to be held on or about April 19, 1990 at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, and a copy of the notice of hearings as published in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman and the Suffolk Times will be sent to you as confirmation (with the exact time) in the near future. We do sincerely thank you for your continued patience during this period of transition within our department. Yours very tru~y: GERARD P. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER GPG/df APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 -Southold, New York 11971 . Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 S.E.Q.R.A. TYPE II ACTION DECLARATION Appeal No. 3920 Project/Applicants: County Tax Map No. Location of Project: A. LIOS 1000- 106-1-14 310 Linda Road, Mattituck Relief Requested/Jurisdiction Before This Board in this Project: Deck addition toexisting pool, excessive lot coverage and insufficient side yard setbacks. This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local Law ~44-4 of the Town of Southold. An Environmental Assessment (Short) Form has been submitted with the subject application indicating that no significant adverse environmental effects are likely to occur should be project be implemented as planned. It is determined that this Board's area of jurisdiction concerning setback, area or lot-line variances determines this application to fall under the established list of Type II Actions. Pursuant to Section 617.2jj, this Department is excluded as an involved agency. This determination shall not, however, affect any other agency's interest as an involved agency under SEQRA 617.2jj. For further information, please contact the Office of the Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 at (516) 765-1809. tm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TOWN OF SO' THOLD COUNTY OF UFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS : HEARING, : Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York May 30, 1990 7:36 P.M. B e f o r e: GERARD p. GOEHRINGER, Chairman APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS: CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI J~ES DINIZIO, JR. Absent Also Present: Doreen Ferwerda Board Secretary GAIL ROSCHEN Official Court Reporter 11971 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 THE CHAIrmAN: This is a special meeting called by the Zoning Board of Appeals We were making decisions and we are reconvening now into a regular special session including several applications that we have been holding in abeyance and have been recessed. The first appeal is Number 3920. I see the contractor is in the audience. Is there anything you would like to add to the hearing? The purpose of this recess was to deal with the lot coverage issue concerning this particular piece of property. We are aware of the memo from the building inspector and we don't have any particular questions concerning it. I don't. Do you have any? MR. DINIZIO: No. It speaks for itself THE CHAIRMAN: We will now be able to make a decision base~ upon the information given to us. MR. BOHN: have the decision Robert Bohn. tonight. THE CHAI~4AN: You could. guaranteeing it. It depends We won't I am not upon how lengthy 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 3 we get. We've only gotten three decisions, and we have about 12 or 15 to do. MR. BOHN: I would be notified by mail. THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. MR. BOHN: Okay. Then you don't need me here. THE CHAIRMAN: I don't need you. I thank you for coming down and I hope I didn't inconvenience you in coming down. MR. BOHN: Okay. No. THE CHAIRMAN: Anybody else that would like to speak concerning the application, eithe: pro or against? Seeing no hands, I make the motion closing this hearing and reserving decision until later. MR. DOYEN: Second. THE CHAIrmAN: All in favor? MR. DOYEN: Aye. MR. SAWICKI: Aye. MR. DINIZIO: Aye. THE CHAIrmAN: The next appeal -- these appeals have been open before. That's why we are not reading the legal notice. It is Appeal Number 3933, in behalf of Pamela 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CERTIFICATION 34 I, Gail Roschen, an Official Court Reporter, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate transcript of my stenographic notes taken on May 30, 1990. GAIL ROSC~{EN SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING - In the matter of: Murray Jacobs, Mark and Ellie Gordon Samuel and Rachel Salzman Eileen Villani Thomas Collins John C. Perrone Eva Halla Robert and Theresa Turner Elsie Parkin, Applicants 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 April 19, 1990 BEFORE: GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman BOARD MEMBERS: CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. ALSO PRESENT: DOREEN FERWERDA THE CHAIRMAN: meeting of 'the of Appeals. This is the regular monthly Southold Town Zoning Board The first appeal on the agenda is. 3926 on behalf of Murray Jacobs. Legal notice reads as follows: Upon Applicant Number 3926. Variance to Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, disapproved for permission to con- struct an accessory shed in side yard, acces- sory buildings may be located in the required rear yard. Property location: 1180 Sage Boulevard, Greenport; County Tax Map Number 1000-53-5-9. I have a copy of the survey dated March 20, 1975 indicating a one-story frame dwelling approximately centrally located on property line, pending --- excuse me, looking at it from the water side, left side which is approximately north, northwest, i see the proposed storage shed of 10x142and I will ask the approximate distances of the applicant. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating that and the surrounding property area. Would you like to be heard, Mr. Jacobs? MR. JACOBS: Murray Jacobs, yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Could I ask that you use the microphone? We're taking ~is down. Thank you. MR. JACOBS: It is impossible for me to use the backyard on this property because it is on the water. The only available spot on my property is where I indicated that shed because the rest of it is on a hill and I don't want to excavate for it. There's no foundation for it, no electricity and no plumbing. It's simply on a few blocks. It is a handsome little house and it was a hardship to be without it because I store a lot of things when I come off my boat that won't fit into my small house. I am asking simply because I don't think it will change the environment at all since there are no trees being knocked down. the rules. THE CHAIRMAN: I'm asking for a change in Could I ask the approxi- mate distance to its closest property line which would be basically, the end of your property? MR. JACOBS: Well, it's three feet. THE CHAIRMAN: What's the approximate distance from the water or the high water mark? MR. JACOBS: The high water mark is probably 25 feet, maybe 30. THE CHAIRMAN: What about on the road? MR. JACOBS: I would say that's about 75 feet, but it is on a hill. THE CHAIRMAN: When I was down there, the shed, it is existing? It is there presently? MR. JACOBS: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: There are no utilities on the shed at all? The reason why I did see it was because there are not any leaves on the is more difficult when there are trees. It leaves. MR. JACOBS: Was that your red Mercedes? THE CHAIRMAN: No, I wish I had a red Mercedes. Somebody else stopped there I guess. MR. JACOBS: It is a handsome little house. THE CHAIRMAN: I didn't say it wasn,t. I have no further questions. Thank you for coming in and giving us those distances. I would ask you however, to recheck them for us, if you would not mind. MR. JACOBS: I'll do it tomorrow and I'll send you a note. I'll be glad to. THE CHAIRMAN: Anything else? Would anyone like to speak on behalf of this appli- cation? (Pause) Would anyone like to speak against this application? (Pause)' Are there -any questions from the Board Members? COLLECTIVE RESPONSE: No. THE CHAIRMAN: No further comments. I make a motion to close the hearing. MR. DINIZIO: Second. THE CHAIRMAN: Ail in favor? MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO~ Aye THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is Mark and Ellie Gordon, Appeal number 3927. The legal notice reads as follows: Upon application number 3927 - Variance to the 100-33, struct Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section as disapproved for permission to con- an accessory building to tennis court located in front yard; accessories permitted in the rear yard only. Property location: Private Road #7, Fords Road, Southold, County Tax Map Number 1000-87-1-18.4. I have a copy of the survey dated May 7, 1987 by Roderick Van Tuyl (phonetically spelled) P.C. and it indicates the prior appeal to this Board for the proposed tennis court which is Appeal Number 3887 and the nature of the application, that the proposed accessory building back up to what appears to be the sotheast side, tennis court and I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating that and the surrounding property in the area. Peter, would you like to be heard? PETER STOUTENBURGH: I'm representing the Gordons~ Mr. Chairman and Members, I'm here to answer any questions. The Gordons, in the previous Appeal, have been granted permission with a five-foot additional set-back from the west property line.whid~ seems to work out q~ite well. The neighbors seem pleased with that and also, reduce the tennis court from 60 feet to 55 feet. The structure they're looking to add to south end court is in furthest from the road closest to their house and will be used as a bath and shower service, sport facility and f~r storage. Previously the Gordons converted their garage, a couple of years ago, and found a lot of equipment and stuff they're looking to store. The utilities they plan are just water and electricity. It will be put on a slab similar construction to a garage. THE CHAIRMAN: The only restrictions we place on anything of this nature is that the doors to the showers open on the outside, Okay? In other words, well let question. The building MR. STOUTENBURGH: accessory story. me just ask you this is one-story? It is within the THE CHAIRMAN: SO if we want to gra~t the application, if we put restrictions of 12 feet which we construe to be one story, does that fall within ... MR. STOUTENBURGH: I'm not designing it. It's the architect. I'm assuming because of the width of it, it would make t~ building look very ...... I assume your problem with that,at least from the design I have seen...did you get a sketch~ THE CHAIRMAN: We may have it here. I think we have. I'm showing 10 feet on the wall. I have it here. I just don't know what the hei§ht of the roof is. MR. STOUTENBURGH: We're shooting for 18 feet or whatever the limitations are on that. THE CHAIRMAN: Will you call us and tell us if it's 18 or whatever it is? I don't think there's any way of scaling it. MR. STOUTENBURGH: That's the problem. It is a sketch. THE CHAIRMAN: There's no scale o~ it. It only shows the 10 feet to this particular point which appears to be above the door. MR. STOUTENBURGH: I can get that informa- tion for you~ THE CHAIRMAN: open rafters? Okay. Is it going to be MR. STOUTENBURGH: Yes, from what I've gotten from the architect and from the Gordons themselves. There's going to be two garages with open and closed screens and breezeway be- tween it and two sort of attic stora§e above it. No indication of interior finishing with the exception of the bath area and large doors, both of the garages on both ends. THE CHAIRMAN: It is going on 24x607 MR. STOUTENBURGH: 24x55. I can get the information on the height. THE CHAIRMAN: What I was saying before, your restriction is that the shower doors open on the outside to preclude, not necessarily in this case, this is a generalization preventing any type of habitable structure ending up with the subsequent owners. MR. STOUTENBURGH: I can understand that. I mentioned the bath opening out, no access from i~side. Is that the same thing as the showers? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. MR. STOUTENBURGH: room opens ... THE CHAIRMAN: TO building. MR. That's one So long as the bath- the exterior of the STOUTENBURGH: I believe it does. thing I knew about. THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, thank you very much. You'll send us, you'll give us a yell. MR. STOUTENBURGH I'll get it sent from the architect on his letterhead. 10. THE CHAIRMAN: Would anybody like to speak in favor of this application? Against? (no one) THE CHAIRMAN: From the Board Members? (no response) THE CHAIRMAN: If there are no further questions, I make a motion to close the hearing. We will receive the height question from Mr. Stoutenburg. MR. DINIZIO: Second. MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. SA~ICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye THE CHAIRMAN: The next is an appeal on behalf of Samuel and Rachel Salzman, Appeal Number 3928. Legal Notice reads as follows~: Upn application, applicant Number 3928, variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, as disapproved for permis- sion to construct addison to an existing dwell- ing, proposed construction will have insufficient front yard setback. Property location: 65 Old Salt Road and 400 Rochelle Place, Mattituck, County Tax Map Number 1000, 144-5-22. I have a copy of a sketch which is dated 1-14-90 indicafingrenovation for this particular dwelling and the nature of this particular application is a 6-foot addition to the front of an existing garage and I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and ~roperty in the surrounding area. Would somebody like to be heard? (No response) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody who would like to speak in favor of this applica- tion? (No response) I really should pause ... THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody who would like to speak against this application? (No response) THE CHAIRMAN: Seeing no hands, I'll. make a motion to close the hearing and reserve the decision until later. MR. DINIZIO: Second. THE CHAIRMAN: Ail in favor? MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: hearing we ever had. Aye Aye This is the fastest 12. THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is on behalf of A. Lios. It is Number 3920 and the Legal Notice reads as follows: Upon application, applicant Number 3920, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, as dis- approved for permission to construct a deck addition to existing pool; proposed construc- tin exceeds permitted lot coverage and will have insufficient side yard setbacks. Property location: 310 Linda Road, Mattituck; County Tax Map Number 1000, Section 106-1-14. I have a survey from Anthony Lewandowski 2-13-90, indicating a one-and-a-half story frame house, screened in porch and swimming pool ~en- closed by a fence with pretty much of a ground level deck around swimming pool, and I have a copy of the. Suffolk County Tax Map indicating thi and surrounding property in the area, and I believe you'd like to be heard, Mr. Bohn? MR. BOHN: Robert Bohn. I don't know what the next thing is but the deck, the ques- tion here is it's 70 or 80% below ground level. That was ~e idea of constructing it, so is the pool. The pool area was excavated out about three and t 13. half feet below grade at one end and at grade at the other end. There was an approved permit for the pool in the side yard. THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, Notice of Disapproval reads, construction exceeds permitted lot coverage. This we discussed one Saturday morning when you came in to see us. Construction exceeded the permitted lot coverage and will have insufficient side yard setback. Action required by.the Zoning Board of Appeals, coverage applied for would be 60% over allowable 20%. Did you do any calcula- tions on this? MR. BOHN: It was done by the Building Department. I don't think that's correct. -It's not that much. THE CHAIRMAN: I thought we calculated roughly, but we didn't have it surveyed at that time. MR. BOHN: I ~rdered a new survey. THE CHAIRMAN: This one we have here, right~ Could I ask you to do this, Mr. Bohn. Could you stop in the Building Department please, sometime within the next two weeks. The disapproval was written by Thomas Fisher but the additional worda( of coverage applied would Be the 65% over allowabl. 14. use. This is by Victor Lessard because he wrote, "Victor" on the bottom. Could you please see how they calculated that 65% so we know exactly what percentage is over as mentioned that day you came in. That was a long time ago. I think it was October, somewhere in that range, 1989. We do have a problem with this lot coverage issue in reference to a percentage basis. It seems 65% is a little in excess of what they're referring to. We'll estimate it ourselves and if you want to get back to us within the next two weeks, we'll address the issue then. MR. BOHN: Do you have the correct .measure- ments on that survey? THE CHAIRMAN: us right now. measure them.. MR. BOHN: THE CHAIRMAN: Original? MR. LESSARD: can't read mine. THE CHAIRMAN: MR. Why don't you give them to I'm sure it's to scale so we'll Do you want a copy of this? Okay, great. Is that the That's not my writing. You Who did that? BOHN: This was the Building Department. 15. Department. THE CHAIRMAN: Well give us all of this and we'll study it and get back to you and if, for some reason we can't decipher this, how it sounds, just let me have your telephone number, Mr. Bohn. MR. BOHN: 765-1119. THE CHAIRMAN: Just let me ask you, do you want to recess this in case we notice additional information? MR. DINIZIO: I have an additional question. permit was MR. permit I'd like to know when the building issued for this pool? BOHN: I didn't apply. The original for a swimming pool was from Norm.Reilly, the building permit for the pool. know about the date. MR. DINIZIO: Well was ago? I don't this five years MR. BOHN: No, it was last year. It's probably just about run out by now. It was around this time last year when the pool went in. MR. DINIZIO: You say there was a variance 16. to put the pool in the side yard? MR. BOHN: I had nothing to do with the pool. All I did was put the deck on. Okay, the pool was shown on the original permit applica- tion, joined to the house. Then we just put a deck around the pool. That's where I came into it and we found out the permit didn't include the deck. It only included the swimming pool. That's how we got to this point. THE CHAIRMAN: But the deck is not at- tached to the house at this particular point? MR. BOHN: No. It is three feet away. MR. DINIZIO: What's the distance f~om the deck to the fence on the side yard? MR. BOHN: It's about six feet to the side and it's right up to the fence on the front point and about twenty-five feet from the rear. MR. DINIZIO: That's the deck, not the pool. MR. BOHN: That's the deck to the fence. MR. DINIZIO: Okay, thank you. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you have any additional questions? (No further questions) THE CHAIRMAN: Do you want to send the 17. Building Department a memo requesting additional information about the pool? MR. DINIZIO: There are definitely some questions as to the lot coverage issue and after we calculate it, I would definitely want to see how they base this lot coverage. THE CHAIRMAN: We'll recess here till the regularly scheduled meeting and we'll hopeful- 1~ have the additional information at that particular time. MR. BOHN: This whole thing came about because of the excavation. In other words, it's way below grade. It was supposed to be allowable at that time. That's where the hang-up came with the Building Department. THE CHAIRMAN: I think in fairness to you, I could be wrong, but we're trying to figure out how ~ey got the swimmin§ pool on the side yard as permitted use because_it's not. You're~contractgd put a deck_around but the accessory structure is nol permitted in the side yard. That's where the.issue Again, the deck is secondary. It is the nature of the hearing, the lot coverage issue but it is secondary to your particular issue. 18. MR. BOHN: They still have to deal with the pool? THE CHAIRMAN: Do you want to answer that question? MR. DINIZIO: I just have a question how it got into this location? THE CHAIRMAN: Department. MR. DINIZIO: That would be the Building I have a question on it. I want to know, I intend to ask the question. THE CHAIRMAN: We had a similar problem over in Southold last Spring. That's the reason we're questioning it, because there was a-similar situation. ~this particular case it was a deck and also a pool also got detached from the house, that was one of our concerns, how it got in the side yard anyway. MR. BOHN: That I could not tell you. I came after but it shows the pool or deck attached to the house. That's in the original applica- tion for the permit. ~That was the only 'reason it was granted, as long as it was attached by six feet to the house. 19. MR. DINIZIO: You would have other problems with that also. MR. BOHN: When I came in, at that point it was after the pool was finished. MR. DINIZIO: Thank you. THE CHAIRMAN: Would you go back to the Building Department, send them a memo and we'll reschedule ~is for a regularly scheduled meeting, We'll re-advertise it in reference to time. We'll send you a notice. You were notified this time? MR. BOHN: Sure. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Is there anybody else that would like to speak on behalf of-the appplication, either pro or con? (Collective response: No.) THE CHAIRMAN: Hearing no questions, I make a motion to recess this hearing until the next scheduled meeting. MR. DINIZIO: Second. THE CHAIRMAN: Ail in MR. GRIGONIS: Aye. MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye favor? 20. THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is in behalf of Eileen Villani, Appeal Number 3921. Legal Notice reads: Upon application of the applicant, Eileen Villani, variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239B, for permission to construct deck addition to existing one-family dwelling, proposed construc- tion will be within 75 feet of water or wetlands. Property location: Private Road 925 Wood Lane, Peconic, County Tax Map Number 1000, 086-06-10. The survey I have before me is dated November 6, 1989 and in behalf of Surveyor, Howard W. Youn§, it indicates a one-story ~rame house and garage and to add a deck of varying distances along the rear of the house adjacent to the waterfront. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and the surrounding property inthe~area. Is there like to be heard? (Robert Kozakiewicz somebody that would phonetic spelling) MR. KOZAKIEWICZ: I'm here on behalf of Eileen Villani. I believe the notice may be misleading, "to construct." Permission to con- struct a deck, existing one-family dwelling and pursuant to April, 1985 or shortly thereafter, 21. her husband and son constructed a deck. Recently she discovered the problem and Got Notice of Disapproval from Mr. Lessard and went to the Board of Trustees. I think the letter is all part of the record before the Board. We recently also sent you a notice from the D.E.C. indicating a letter of No Jurisdiction from them based upon the fact the bulkhead in question has been there since or prior to September 20,1977. The house, when purchased in 1985 was in the present con- figuration as it existed,- and would be within the 75 feet of the bulkhead as it was. I spoke to Mrs Villani and she could not be here.and she indicated to me that she wished to make. known to the Board that at that time she didn't realize the consequences inasfar as the Town Board with the 75 foot setback, and the survey does show, with respect to setback, we have 39.8 feet wood bulkhead and 45.8 ... so we're looking for a variance on approximately 50% in this case. THE CHAIRMAN: Does she plan to have a roof on the deck at all? MR. KOZAKIEWICZ: No. THE CHAIRMAN: So the deck will remain open? 22. MR. KOZAKIEWICZ: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Will there be any chan§es or modifications to the deck? MR. KOZAKIEWICZ: She tells me, no. She indicated there would be none. THE CHAIRMAN: Will there be any additional lighting placed around the deck? MR. KCZAKIEWICZ: No, I didn't ask her that particular question. I don't believe so. THE CHAIRMAN: Well thank you for coming in. I have no further questions. Are there any questions by any Board Members? (Collective response: No.) THE CHAIRMAN: Would anybody in the public like to speak either pro or con concerning the last application. (No response) THE CHAIRMAN: Seeing no hands, I'll make the motion to close the hearing and reserve decision till later. MR. DINIZIO: Second. MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye 23. THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal on the agenda is Applicant Appeal Number 3919, Legal Notice reads: Upon application of applicant Thomas Collins, variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239 4.B, for per- mission to construct a deck addison to a one- family dwelling, proposed construction will be less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. Property location: 305 Dawn Drive, East Marion, County Tax Map Number 1000, Section 35-5-20. I have a survey from Howard W. Young, the most recent date, May 31st ... I'm sorry, September 6, 1989, indicating a one-story frame house and garage somewhat centrally located. The nature of the application is three-phrase deck which extends to the southeast property line pretty much east, comprising different variations of~ 16.3xi~ feet; 8.0x5'; !0.8x7' and attached and graduated as it goes down to the water. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax map indicating this and surrounding prop- erty area. Would anyone like to be heard? Sir? 24. MR. BOWMAN: My name is Charles Bowman, President of Land Use Company and I'm representing Mr. Collins. The situation here again, is the deck is partially constructed. It is not yet completed. There's still some decking missing. Mr. Collins was unaware of the need for a 75' setback requirement. There is property in ~e area that has structures closer than the 75'. I'm sure upon your inspection, you'll see most property developed right to the bulkheads with the lawn to the bulkhead where the existing deck would be 49' rather than 75' from the bulk- head. But certainly it is our opinion that it would conform to the neighborhood. Also, it would not have any detrimental effect on Dawn Lagoon. We're here after being advised by Mr. Lessard we should be here. So we hope you'll consider this. THE CHAIRMAN: We'd like to ask two questions, somewhat similar to the last hearing. Will, at any time, there be either gazebos or any roofing placed on any one of these three tiers? MR. BOWMAN: No sir. THE CHAIRMAN: Will there be any lighting 25. that would be other than shielded to the property? MR. BOWMAN: No, sir, not that I'm aware of. THE CHAIRMAN: Will there be any further extensions on the deck? MR. BOWMAN: No sir. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much. Is there anyone else who would like to speak in favor of the application? (No response) THE CHAIRMAN: Would anybody like to speak a§ainst the application? (No response) THE CHAIRMAN: Seeing no hands, I make a motion to close the hearing and reserve decision till later. MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: MR. GRIGONIS: Second. Ail in favor? Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is Appeal Number 3930, John C. Perrone. Legal Notice reads as follows: Applicant Appeal Number 3930, Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-10lB, for permission to occupy and use as a billiard parlor for commercial 26. recreation. Property location: Main Road, State Road 25, Mattituck, County Tax Map Number 1000, Section 122-6-31. The special exception reads: Occupancy for use of billiard parlor for commercial rec- reation, fully enclosed, using normal acces- sories incidental hereto associated with ~is activity. Varying the occupancy for this use consists of four units, total area 36x80.4 within Building Number 1 closest to Main Road. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding property in the area. Would you like to be heard, Mr. Cuddy? MR. CUDDY: Charles Cuddy for applicant, John Perrone who is at my side. I would first ask that you accept into the record the disclos- ure affidavit. Mr. Perrone's wife, Polly Perrone is now employed by the Planning Depart- ment. I'll hand that up to you. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much Mr. Cuddy. MR. CUDDY: Mr. Perrone is a Mattituck resident who would like to open a billiard parlor on his property which is commonly known as 27. Mattituck Commons. It is on the north side of Main Road opposite a gas station in the business area. The property is surrounded by businesses. The site was approved about a year and a half ago by the Planning Board, consisting of three buildings. This building that's nearest to the road, is approximately 2900 square feet and he proposes to install 12 billiard tables and to operate it under his direction. In other words, he will be there. going to lease the property. He's going to control it. He's going to supervise it. He intends that no one under sixteen will be . permitted on the premises. He intends to operate it on a basis from Tuesday through Sunday and he would operate it from hours of ... approximately, I would say twelve to He's twelve during the weekdays. it weekends from one p.m. to Saturday and Sgnday. This is an area that He would operate two a.m. Friday, has abundant parking for this type of operation because all the other places are closed durin§ the heavy 28. hours that his billiard parlor would be operating. He's going to ~nvest approxi- mately forty thousand dollars in getting the tables and set-up and he'll have a snack bar but no alcohol, so that's no problem. He's set conditions that there be no alcohol at these premises. .He's local and he's going to be in there full time. I would submit to the Board that this probably is as decent an operation as you could get. I believe that it conforms to all the requirements that are set forth in 263 and 264 of the Code. I don't envision that there would b% any adverse effect on the surrounding area or upon the businesses or property. I'd ask the Board to approve this application. THE CHAIRMAN: Can I have the Sunday hours? MR. CUDDY: One p.m. to two a.m., I'm sorry, one to twelve and the Friday and Saturday hours are one p.m. to two a.m. THE CHAIRMAN: For the record, there is no school in close proximity except for the Laurel Elementary School? 29. MR. CUDDY: That's right. THE CHAIRMAN: So that's no particular problem. There's no sale of alcohol so that should not be a particular problem. We have placed restrictions on other food establish- ments that are closest to the school in the past. But I don't foresee any problem in that respect. Thank you very much for comin§ in. MR. CUDDY: Thank you. THE CHAIRMAN: Would anybody like to speak in favor of the application? (Collective response: No.) THE CHAIRMAN: Would anybody like to speak against the application? (Collective response: No.) THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions from any Board Members? (Collective response: No.) THE CHAIRMAN: Hearing no questions, I'll make a motion to close the hearing and reserve decision until later. MR. DINIZIO: Second. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you all for coming in. All in favor? 30. MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal number Ks 3914 and the Legal Notice reads .... could I just ask somebody to close that back door? ...Thank you. Appeal applicant, Eva Halla, Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIV, Sec- tion 100-244, Bulk and Parking Area, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, building setbacks from water or wetlands, for permission to' construct a one-family dwelling. Property location: 55 Glen Court, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 083-01-01. The survey I have before me, produced by Roderick Van Tuyl (phonetic spelling) the most recent date, September ... January 4,1990. We have a very interesting application here in that the applicant is requesting a . zero lot line based upon the top of the bluff to Glen Court, which is simply at this particular point a paper street and the application ( her is a request that the deck be approximately 65 feet from the top of the bluff or what we refer to as the lip of the bluff. I have a zero lot line right adjacent tO Glen Court with a 15'.setback on the west side, 33' on the east side I have a copy of Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding property in the area. Mr. Lar] MR. LARK: Richard Lark, Main Road Cutchogue. The first thing I'd like to hand up would be a single and separate ownership search which is 244 Section. Should you re- quire it, I hand that up as an exhibit. I thought the Chairman was going to read the application. The application is a part of the record, sworn by Mrs. Halla, on January 26, 1990. However, I would like to cover a couple of highlights for the Board since, as Mr. Goehringer said, this is a unique application. Mrs. Halla cannot be here tonight because she lives in Levittown and is ill. However, builder, Mr. Dempsey is here and he can answer any questions since the application you have before you, she was working in concert with him to try to conform this house to the existing topography and surrounding neighborhood and existing houses there. There was indicated in this application or petition that Mrs. Halla, your petitioner is under contract to Mr. Dempsey. However, it was contingent upon getting the building permit. One of the key pieces to keep in mind here is that this is a lot on a single, separate ownership since February 13, 1970 when she and her husband purchased it. The map is a filed map called the Map of Birch Hill which was filed some years prior, I believe 1965. So one section of the zoning code which we'll cover in a minute, says we can go back to the '65 code. So I'll just point that out. In the interim, her husband died so she is the sole owner and she'no longer has any need or intent to 'build on the property and that's the reason she's selling to Mr. Dempsey. But her original intent was to build the home. her husband passed away in '83 so she's decided to sell the lot. The lot you have on that map before you is 100' width and it runs to the, really, foot of the bluff. It has a legal depth of 205' but when looking at the file 33. there's another 50 feet interior that's owned by the Beach Association. That's why you see in the north, the separate search is owned by the Associ- ation. The lot does not go to the high water mark. It goes basically, to the bottom of the bluff with a legal 205 feet from the roadway as indicated in the map. The area, since the filed map, I don't know how to define, "substantial," but the neighbor: have found in that area over the years, the bluff erodes at approximately 1 foot per year, the top of it. That's approximate. If you go back to the early surveys and I know from my own experience, living in the neighborhood, that's about ~ight on average, about 1 foot per year it is receding. So what you have here today, you have 151 feet useable property on the westerly side and 134 feet on the easterly side, The bluff runs on a bias to the front of the property on the roadway so that's why you have the difference in footage, the zoning in effect at that time, the file map when she bought. However, that was a kind of misnomer because the zoning required 12,500 square feet. As the maps are, they're half-acres, 20,000. That's what the Health Department was requiring in those days 34. but the front yard in those days was 35' and the rear yard 25'. It had required 20,000 for the Health Department. In those days there were other houses along the bluff in that area and there was no problem. There are two houses to the east owned by Mrs. Bryant that got variances from the Board of 25 feet, some ten or fifteen years ago when the houses were constructed but they did not have the erosion problem or the shallow lot depth that this lot now suffers. Now the property as you know, is zone R-40 It becomes a non-conforming lot under the existing zoning ordinance in all respects, width, depth, front and side yard requirements, in order to con- struct any kind of home, and I stress that, any kind of home, on the property. Also another sectioi under the zoning code which you're familiar with is you have to have a setback of 100 feet from the top of the bank so you don't have to go past 6th grade to realize you can't conform or build even a dog house on the property, much less anything else when you take it into the zoning. I want to digress here because when the zoning was passed, they passed Section 100-244, 35. sub-section (a) states the policy. Sub-section (b) talks about single and separate, so this meets the requirements that it's a single and separate. The end of sub-section (b) they talk about what relief can be granted and then the zoning law goes over to section (c) which is a little bit confusing. It says that in the case of a single, separate owner- ship,non-conforming lot in that sub-division, approved after April 9, 1957, which we have here, relief of all front, side and rear yard area di- mensions shall be granted to the extent that the front, side and rear side area dimensions were re- quired at the time the map was originally ~iled. That is, as I indicated, 25' in the rear, 10' on the side and 35' in the front. You can construct a house with that. With that section, you will to determine if it will give us relief from 100'. But even if you do determine it and after consultin~ with the builder and everything, we still come and apply for a variance,it is still felt that for a variance for zero front feet because, again, as you indicated, of the erosion problem on the bluff, you'd be kidding yourselves to try and force 36. a home up toward the bluff. This was pre- sented to the Association and when it was .explained to them, they heartily endorsed it and they own the roadway. It wasa private road as well as a beach and they heartily endorsed the house be built on the road, right on the road. What it is intended to do, and have as a part of that application, is never to develop that road but rather give an easement of 25 feet ... I'm sorry .... 25 feet apiece on each of the adjoining lot owners, they're not to construct anything there but it would be-land- scaped easement because the road, as you all know, was constructed back in 1965 and has fallen into disrepair. There are trees and shrubs and Weeds and there is no road there at this time. It's very unsightly, so the Association endorsed granting the driveway which was what Mr. Dempsey wanted to construct on his 25 feet on the side half of it. And then on the other half would be put landscap- ing which would blend in with a high ante- bellum home. This sits on a lot on the south 37. which was originally the estate owned by Lupron (phonetic spelling.) That seems to be a reason- able solution because they did not want Mr. Demp- sey or anyone else to construct a home any closer to the bluff. Of course, all the builders would like to put the homes on the bluff because they can sell so rapidly but it is a fact, and the circumstances of erosion and all the problems they have there, it is not a simple matter of just bulkheading the bottom. If the Board goes there to see the many thousands of dollars spent by property owners. The east, they bulkheaded the bottom, bulkheaded the middle, bulkheaded the top this winter. It still comes back a'foot per year no matter what's done over there. By allowing plant vegetation to grow, it slows down the erosion problem with the exception of course, of a hurricane or excessive rain. Then it all goes to a mud slide and that's where we get the average of a foot per year. So, by putting it up by a roadway, al- though it requires zero variance, it does make sense in this situation. The Association and neighbors all endorse it because they think 38. that it's a reasonable way of solving the problem. It does give a 65 foot setback from the bluff, not 100 foot but again, rather than try to enforce a section of the code which allows 25 foot rear yard which we could have obtained at the time, it seems a lot of sense to do it this way. I won't comment on the house. If you have any questions, you can ask Mr. Dempsey. He's here. I won't take up much more of your time. It is a Catch 22 situation but with this type of home that he's constructing with a deck and the rear end and rear yard of the property which would still be 65 foot, the north end of this, from the bluff which I have submitted to the Health Department and they have approved. I think you have a letter in the file indicating installation where the septic tank and cesspool and water would be. That has been approved. THE CHAIRMAN: You concur, the zoning existed in 1970 and basically is the same zoning that you would have today in reference to the setback concerning the area of Section 244? 39. MR. LARK: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: These were what, again? MR. LARK: As I indicated, we had not changed the code till '71 or '72 and the map was filed in '65 and you had a 35 feet yard front and a 25 feet rear yard ... THE CHAIRMAN: Is the map on the excepted list? MR. LARK: It is not the excepted map. It is a file map that meets the requirements of 244. THE CHAIRMAN: question is because lng it in total, a The reason I ask that I have trouble understand- law, you can superimplant prior side yard and rear yard and front yard up to the present day standards. We still have, under those sections, relief from un- divided lots so therefore, with this type of problem, how you can superimplant old zoning on top of the present zoning. MR. LARK: That's why I pointed out the section. I'm not sure that 244 Section (c) supercedes what I read in (b) Section. I'm really not sure on it but it all became academic after talking to the Property Owners' Association and realizing the erosion problems and the type of homes constructed there in rel&tionship to the neighborhood. So he would- not put 850 square foot house but he does pro- pose to put up there, as you have in the appli- cation a house that has got 2252 souar~ foot, 1768. He's also confonted with 1600 square foot covenant restriction problem. We have a lot of problems to overcome and so it was decided to go in for zero front yard area, then if the Board felt that 244 section didn't, apply to 239 section, then to ask for a variance.of 100 foot. So we're movin§ back from 100 foot end up as to 65 feet. THE CHAIRMAN: The only other thing I wanted to mention was the issue of 1600 square feet. Are there any other houses in the sub- division that are less than 1600 square feet? MR. LARK: No. THE CHAIRMAN: So the Association amends the 1600 square feet stay? MR. LARK: Yes, they're all larger, as 41. a matter of fact. THE CHAIRMAN: Ail right, I guess we'll talk to Mr. Dempsey. MR. DEMPSEY: John Dempsey. The only question is, of course, which has been pretty much answered is, why a particular configuration of a house is, after reviewing the property with Dick, is there a limitation, the configuration? In other words, why, having that piece come out toward the road which I don't know what figure you're referring to or letter. It's really a reverse "L",... the lower ~ortion'6f ~the '!L" is a gara§e area, I'm not set on this particular house. I have flexability. I just have a house and I figure I would settle in this community and on this piece of property. THE CHA.IRMAN: garage could be ~... decreased on the east MR. DEMPSEY: THE CHAIRMAN: So, in other words, the (inaudible)..... would~be side? Yes. Thank you very much. MR. LARK: We do have a part of the appli- cation. He has a building plan layout add proposed elevation and he wanted a house with 42. a garage because it fits in with the neighborhood. He felt that by putting it on the roadway, that way he could landscape what is now a paper street to give access. There was a resolution rather than go to a separate, detached garage, drive straight in, then that requires a further variance and more construction on the property. THE CHAIRMAN: The only reason I wanted to mention that Mr. Lark, is we're talking specifically about easement, not abandonment of road. It is strictly an easement there. I know the road, most construc- tion there is a driveway and then it's landscaped. To my knowledge, these are private roads. They're owned by associations. If the Domlaski (phonetic) farm was developed, there was no ingress going to this particular area. MR. LARK: That's correct. adamant they are, the speculators To show how named, bought to cut out four lots, legal as sections, down Oregon Road through the farm lots. They approached the Association and practically offered lifetime paving and all kinds ot money and everything else but when the Association looked at it, they were 43. adamant, not to allow anybody else in and out of there. As a practical matter when you look at Diminski's (phonetic) piece, on the excavation ~... that's why Mr. Dempsey pushed the house as far to the west as he could because it's a tremendous ride straight up there which, you have a lot of excavation. How do you handle that? The ori§inal subdivision was 65 and it was probably not proper that they allow these properties in Greenport. The only other thing is what about the disturbance of land in the front and the rear of the house which would be between the deck and the top of the bluff? MR. LARK: He built the house on thebluff. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you understand the ques- tion? Are you clipping the bluff in any way? Well, are you.proposing to clip the bluff? MR.DEMPSEY: I'm sure you would like me to s~ "No." Obviously, I would like to obtain as nice a view as I could for the homeowner on the type of growth that is in there. Now there are not any substantial trees. Most of them are locust and wild cherry and poison ivy. THE CHAIRMAN: You have to say poison ivy? 44. I had poison ivy already this year. MR. DEMPSEY: There's black cherry, some locust trees. Until 1970 that was cleared. That had been cleared by the original developer in 1964 and '65 when he did the subdivision. He cleared that. Believe it or not, that was used by a skeet range. That lot was cleared, so the trees that you have there really have grown since about 1973 give or take a year and not very big. THE CHAIRMAN: We're definitely going to have to investigate that a little more. The only other investigation I'm going to request, I will attack that from the water side which I have not done till this point. We'll ask Sloane Water Conservation to go down and evaluate the bluff and we'll do that within the next two weeks. The reason we have not gone down is that the property line does not extend to the high water mark but in this. particular case, I mentioned this is a unique application so we make application ton~rrow to Sloane Water to let them go down and evaluate the bluff. MR. LARK: I suggest to the Board that we recess till the next regularly scheduled meeting 45. and wrap it up till that point. THE CHAIRMAN: During that time, a couple of us, well we'll all go down and attack it. I'm going to do it from the water side. My only concern is the top of the foundation may possibly give us an elevation factor from either the front corner of the house ... but where at the top of the foundation we would approximately be where we could get an idea exactly where we're going. MR. LARK: You mean the road side, the actual house, not the garage? THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, we're talking right here (indicating) of the foundation. right now. MR. LARK: this point right here, the top Okay, three feet'above g~ade Okay, to gain flexibility there, to raise it or. lower it? THE CHAIRMAN: I understand that we've had this application for a little while and it is necessary that we deal with it on this partic-,]~ basis. MR. LARK: When they build on the water, they like to get a foundation high, out of the ground because of the view. They push you. I also questioned it. That's the answer they gave me 46. since. side. So what they said, three feet, I'm sure that's what they have in mind to get it up as high as they can. THE CHAIRMAN: That would be a normal height for a foundation, five foot in and three foot out. Do you have a pretty even grade at that particular point? MR. DEMPSEY: Yes it is...only when you get closest to the water. When you go west by Diminski,it goes right up. You have to look this time of year. You can see clear. In the summer time it's covered and you can't see as you can now. THE CHAIRMAN: I have not been down there I'll go back and attack it from the water MR. LARK: When you get to the bluff, it is ... it seems to go level but when you come back toward the mansion the hill starts to... I~ ~he original subdivider actually cut a ro~d in,.. ,it has compounded.' That's a hell of a Droblem they're living with. 'Thls erosion has to stop, this erosion ............ so that's why he was tucking the house as far west as he could get. 47. He originally wanted to put it on the east. Then when he realized he was nestling in it, so to speak ... THE CHAIRMAN: much. Very good. Thank you very Is there anybody who would like to speak on behalf of this application? (No response) Is there anybody who would like to speak against this application? (No response) Are there any questions from the Board Members? (Collective response: No) THE CHAIRMAN: Hearing no further questions I make a motion to recess this hearing unti-1 the next regularly scheduled meeting and we'll do a further investigation and refer the matter to Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation. MR. DINIZIO: Second. THE CHAIRMAN: Ail in favor? MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN~ Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye 48. THE CHAIRMAN: Robert and Theresa Turner. Appeal Number 3922. Legal Notice reads as follows: Upon Application of the Applicants, Robert and Theresa Turner, Appeal application number 3922, Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A.4, Bulk and Parking Area, for permission to construct an attached swimming pool to house. Property location: 1525 Albo Drive, Laurel. County Tax Map Number 1000,-126-03-17. I have a copy of the survey dated January 24, 1989 indicating from Roderick Van Tuyl,p.c. an above ground swimming pool. Proposed depth area approximately 7 plus or minus feet from the west property line. I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map. Would you like to be heard, MR. TURNER: Robert Turner, Mr. Turner? 1525 Albo Drive, Laurel. The existing pool as it is now, if I were to move it, would block the entrance to the basement door so that's the reason for the variance. THE CHAIRMAN: You're proposing to C 49. deck around that stairway? MR. TURNER: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: It is in existence, an in-ground pool? MR. TURNER: Yes. That's not necessarily the application. THE CHAIRMAN: You can do that ... only this matter, 7% feet of this ... I'm sorry 7 feet is toward a particular property line, Is that correct? MR. TURNER: It is more like 3½. The pool is 3½ into the side yard but it is 7 feet from the property line. There's not §oin§ to be any change. The pool stays right where it is. THE CHAIRMAN: Are you putting a deck around this side of the pool? MR. TURNER: No. THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, the deck will only be as you're showing here, toward the east side of the property or more directly in the center of the house? MR. TURNER: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: So that part of the pool would be exposed as if presently is? Will there be any more changes, any additions? MR. TURNER: No. THE CHAIRMAN: Okay, no railroad ties or anything of that nature changing it? MR. TURNER: No. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank~you very much. Is there anybody who would like to speak on behalf of this application? (no response) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone who would like to apeak against this application? (no response) THE CHAIRMAN: Any questions from the Board Members. (Collective response: NO.) Hearing no further questions, I'll make a motion to close the hearing and reserve decision till later. MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: Second. All in favor? 51. MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: Aye Aye Thank you for coming in. I hope to have a decision for you shortly. THE CHAIRMAN: The next appeal is on behalf of Elsie Parkin, Number 3925. The legal notice reads as follows: Appeal Number 3925, Elsie Parkin. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Bulk and Parking Regulations in this Division of land. Property location: 7575 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, County Tax Map'Number 1000-104-04-27. I have a copy of the map dated January24, 1990, Roderick Van Tuyl, p.c. Lot Number 1 being 37,500 square 'feet with road frontage approximately 125 feet; lot number 2 which is a lot that includes 27,'400 sq.feet which is approximately 128 feet road frontage, Skunk Lane and Bay Avenue. This is the Suffolk County Tax Map of this and the surrounding area. Is there anybody that would like to be heard on behalf of this application? KAREN HAGEN: Karen Hagen, Wickham, Wickham and Bressler. (Phonetic) Applicant regrets she can't be here. She has a work-related meeting. What I'd like to say about the application, we have been in a similar situation in the past where two houses on one lot, the practical difficult' being that it is difficult and burdensome two houses on one lot, in terms of selling, renting and keeping up the property. stress that the size of the the surrounding lot on the And I'd like to lot in comparison to same zoning is large to subdivide property and would enable the neighbor- hood to have a lot of similar size to surrounding lots and would also be easier for property owners to keep up their P.C.O.'s. I submit for the applicant, there has been an access for more than thirty-three years, both dwellings occupied since prior to the zoning code. This is the former Petruchi (phonetic) houses and I assume there was an active C.O. on both these houses. THE CHAIRMAN: Yes there are. How long has Mrs. ?arkin owned the property? MS. HAGEN: parcel since 1971. Since 1971. She owned both She and her husband obtained 53. both parcels in 1971. It was deeded to her alone, in 1976. THE CHAIRMAN: These houses are rented? Or does she live in one of them? MS. HAGEN: She lives in the smaller one and rents out the larger one. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Ms. Hagen. Is there anyone else who would like to speak in favor of this application? (No response) Is there anyone who would like to speak against the application? (No response) Would any of the Board Members like to ask any questions? (Collective response: No) Seeing no hands, and no questions from the Board Members, I make a motion to close this hearing and reserve decision until later. MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: MR. GRIGONIS: Second. All in favor? Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: THE CHAIRMAN: that I recessed, Aye We have one more hearing a hearing from a prior meeting. I~d more water. We'll recess. So move. All MR. GRIGONIS: Aye MR. DOYEN: Aye MR. SAWICKI: Aye MR. DINIZIO: Aye (Recess of the Agenda for April 19, 1990) (Last hearing on April 19, 1990 Agenda, Robert Ochenreiter and Edward Lenceski, Number 3908 See separate transcript, same date.) like to run out for a second and grab a little in favor? CERTIFICATION I, Myrtle Kiefer, do hereby certify that I am an Official Court Reporter and that the foregoinG constitutes a true and correct transcript according to my official stenographic notes. Date Grand Jury Reporter 55. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAt~ICKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOID, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.'1809 FAX NO. (516) 765-1823 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed herewith as confirmation of the time, date and place of the public hearing concerning your application is a copy of the Legal Notice, as published in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman, Inc. and Suffolk Times, Inc. Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time specified in the event there are questions brought up during the same and in order to prevent a delay in the processing of your application. Your public hearing will not start before the times allotted in the attached Legal Notice. Please feel free tQ call our office prior to the hearing date if you have questions or wish to update your file. Yours very truly, dff GERARD p. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER COUNTY OF SU~OL~ Yvonne Lieblein of Mattltuck, In ~id ~un~, being du~ ~orn, s~s t~t ha/sba ~ Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at MattRue~ In the Town of Southold, ~un~ of Suffolk and State of New Yor~ and that the Notice of which t~ a~exed ~ a print~ co~, ~s b~n r~ula~ ~b~ed In said Newspaper once each weak for 1 weeks successively, commencing on the 24 day of May 19 90 ////)/) ../ C'R{incipal Clerk Swom to b~ore me this ~ MARY K. ~E~NAN / -- Suffolk County No. / Term Expires Februa~7'(~ NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to the Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at a Special Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971, on WEDNESDAY, MAY 30, 1990, at the following times: /~v/:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3920--' ~iA~.,,LIOS. Variance to the Zon. lng Ordinance, Article XXIV. Section 100-244, as disapproved for permission to construct dec additions. Proposed constru( on exceeds permitted lot cove~ ge, and will have insufficient] side yard setbacks. Property. Location: 310 Linda Road, Mat- tituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106, Block 1, Lot 14. p.m. Appl. No. 39.~ 7:35 PAMELA VALENTINE. Vari- ance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-231 A, for permission to construct an 8 ft. fence in the front yard area. Fence in the front yard area not to exceed 4 ft. in height. Pro~ perry 'Location: 34655 Main Road, Orient, County Tax Map No. 1~00, Section 019~ Block 01; Lot 5 & 6. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3914~ EVA HALLA. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill A, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, Bulk; Area and Parking, Articl6 XXIII, Section 100-239.4, build-' ing setbacks from water or web lands, for permission to con: struct a one family dwelling~ Property Location: 55 Glen Court, Cutchogue, County Tax~ Map No. 1000, Section 083, Block 01, LOt 01. 7:45 p.m. AppL No. 3895-- ROBERT AND ETHELLE SCHROEDER. Variance for re- versal of the building inspector for change of use of land and existing building without obtain- ing a Certificate of Occupancy. Property location: 4380 Main Road, East Marion, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 35, Block 5, Lot 4. 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3907-- NICHOLAS ALIANO. Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article Ill A, Section 100-30 A.2 (Article XXV, Sec- tion 100-253 A), as disapprov- ed, for permission to construct a retail/office complex, pro- posed construction is not per- mitted in this. R-40 Zone Dis- trict. Property Location: 29950 Main Road, 30 Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 102, Block 03, Lot 01. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworr Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for ' weeks successively, commencing on the ....... ~ .' ............. Sworn to before me this '5~ tl/~-5 day of ......... ?i ........ ? Notary Public 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3915- JORDAN'S PARTNERS. Vari- ance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71, as disapproved for permission to construct office and retail stores. Proposed construction is not permitted use in this District. Property Location: 1000 Main Street and 160 Main Road, Greenport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 34, Block 2, Lot 1. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives de- siring to be heard in each of the above matters. Written comZ ments may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not start before time allot~ ted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated: May 21~ 1990 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD: P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Doreen Ferwerda IX, 5/24/90 (7) BARBARA A. ~CH,qEIDER NOTARY PUgLIC, Stat~ af New York No, 480C,8,i3 Com,nis~ioll Ex,ma ~? -3, ~ NY 11971, 0n THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 1990. at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl. No., 3926 -- 53. Block 5, Lot 9. NO~I~E OF HE~RINGS . NOTICEIS Ill]REBYGIVE~.pur. [ ~rc~vcd,]for pcrmission to construct an accpssory building to tennis court l.deatcd in front yard, aecc. s- sorics pcrmittcd in the rear yard arca Only. Property Location: Private Road {~7, Fords Road. Southold. County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 087, Block 01, Lot 18.4. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3928 -- SAMUEL AND RACHEL SALZ- Rochclin Place, Mattltuck. County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 144. Block 5. Lot 22. , ,'~45~p.m. Appl. No. 3920 -- A.~ LIOS. Variance to the Zoning Ordi- ~ nancc, Ardclc XXIV, Section 100- Block_ _ I, Lot 14. ~ TIIOMAS COLLINS. Variance to XXIII. Scction 100-239 4. E. for Propc~y Location: 55 Olcn Court. Cutch~guc, County ]'ax Map No. 1000, Section 083, Block 01, Lot 01. 8:10 p.m. AppL No. 3922 -- ROBERT AND TIll~ESA TURNER. Variance to thc Zoning Ordinance, Article Ill. Section 100-30 A.4, Bulk and Parking ama, for permis- sion to construct an attached swimming pool to house. Property Location: 1525 Albo Ddvc, Laurel, County Tax Map No. 1000. Sccdoa 126, Block 03, Lot 17. g;15 p.m. AppL No. 3925 -- ELSIE PARK.IN. Variance to thc Zoning Ordinance, Article HI A, Section 100-30 A.3, Bulk and Park- lng Rcgularioas in this Divisie,~ o~ Land. Property Location 7575 Skunk Lone, Cutchoguc, County Tax Map No. I000, Section 104, Block 04. Lot 27. 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3908 -- ROBERT OCHS 'ENRE1TER AND EDWARD LEIVCESKI. Variance fo~ reversal of a building pcrmit to construct a one family dwelling. Property Locadon 565 Bayer Road, Mattituch. County Tax Map No. 1000. Section 139. Block 3. LOt 14. Thc Board of Appeals will at maid time and place hear any and all per- sons or tcpr~entativcs desiring to be heard in cach of thc above mat- tots. Writtc41 commctmt~ may also be submitted prior to thc coaclusion of thc subject hearing. Each hcating will not start bcfote dsc allottcd. Additional time for your prezentalion will be available. if necdcd. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated April 9, 1990 BYORDI~R OF BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD p. GO 'EtHUNGER CI-IAIRMAN By Dotccn Fcrwcrda 6644-1TAI2 Hearings for May 30, Long Island Watchman Suffolk Times Clerk Bulletin Board ZBA Bulletin Board Mr. Robert Bohn Box 55 Peconic, NY 11958 (A. Lios) Mr. Henry Raynor P.O. Drawer A Jamesport, Ny 11947 (Nicholas Aliano) Richard Lark, Esq. P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 (Eva Halla) Ms. Pamela Valentine 249 West 29th St., Apt. New York, NY lO001 Scott Zambek, Esq. 801 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788 (Jordan's Partners) Dan C, Ross, Esq. Wickham, Wickham & P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 (Robert and Ethelle 1990 - Legal Notices the following: 12 Bressler Schroeder) send May 22, 1990 to Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHO/D, L.l., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 FAX No. (516) 765-1823 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI JAMES DINIZlO, JR. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed herewith as confirmation of the time, date and place of the public hearing concerning your application is a copy of the Legal Notice, as published in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman, Inc. and Suffolk Times, Inc. Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time specified in the event there are questions brought up during the same and in order to prevent a delay in the processing of your application. Your public hearing will not start before the times allotted in the attached Legal Notice. Please feel free tQ call our office prior to the hearing date if you have questions or wish to update your file. Yours very truly, dff GERARD P. CHAIRMAN GOERRINGER NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at a Regular Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, N.Y. 11971, on THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 1990, at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3926-- MURRAY JACOBS. Varianc~ to the Zoning Ordinance, Arti- cle I11, Section 100-33, as dis- approved for permission to con- struct an accessory shed in side yard, accessory buildings may be located in the required tear yard. Property Location: 1180 Sage Boulevard, Grecnport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 53, Block $, Lot 9. 7:35 p.m. AppL No. 3927--' MARK AND ELLIE GOR- DON. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 1II, Section 100-33, as disapproved, for per- mission to consttoct an acces- sory building to tennis court located in front yard, accessories permitted in the rear yard area only. Property Location: Private Road g7, Fords Road, Southold, County Tax Map No. 1000, Sec- tion 087, Block 01, Lot 18.4. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3928-- SAMUEL AND RACHEL SALZMAN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section I00-30 A.3, as disap- proved, for pecmission to con- stroct addition to an existing dwelling, proposed coastroction will have insufficient front yard setbacks. Property Location: 65 Old Salt Road and 400 Rochelle Place, Mattituck, County 'lhx Map No. 1000, Section 144, Block 5, Lot 22. //'""~ 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 3920---'~ A. LIOS. Variance to the Zon- ng Ordinance, Article XXIV,~ Section 100-244, as disapproved,~ for permission to construct a deck addition to existing pool,~ proposed construction exceedsV  permitted lot coverage, and will '.* ~ have insufficient side yard set- backs. Property Location: 310 Linda Road, Mattituck, Coun- ty 'lhx Map No. 1000, Section~/~ 106, Block 1, Lot 14. -- 7:50 p,m['AppL EILEEN VILLANI. Vari~mce to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239 B, for permission to construct deck ad- dition to existing one family dwelling, proposed construction will be within 75 ft. of water or wetlands. Property Location: Private Road 925 Wood Lane, Peconlc, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 086, Block 06, Lot. 10. 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3919- THOMAS COLLINS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Arti- cle XXIII, Section 100-239 4.B, for perm/ssiun to construct a deck addition to a one family dwelling, proposed construction will be less than 75 ft. from the bulkhead. Property Location: 305 Dawn Drive, East Marion, County Tax Map No. 1000, Sec- tion 35, Block 5, Lot 20. 8.'00 p.m. Appl. No. 3930---' JOHN C. PERRONE. Spedal Exception to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article X, Section 100-10lB, for permission to oc- cup,/and use as a billiard par- lot for commercial recreation. Property Location: Main Road, State Road 25, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Sec~'ac tion 122, Block 6, Lot 31. 8:05 p.m. Appl. No. 3914-- EVA HALLA. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIV, Section 100-244, Bulk and Parking Area, Article XXIII, Section 1ll0-2~9.4 build- ing setbacks from water or wet- lands, for petmiesion to con- struct a one family dwelling. Property Location: 55 Glen Court, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 083, Block 01, Lot 0L 8:10 p.m. Appl. No. 3922~ ROBERT AND THERESA TURNER. Variance to the Zon- ing Ordinance, Article i11, Sec- tion 100-30 A.4, Bulk and Park- ing area, for permission to con- struct an attached swimming pool to house. Property Loca- tion: 1525 Albo Drive, Laurel, County Tax Map No. 1000, Sec- tion 126, Block 03, Lot 17. 8:15 p.m. Appl. NO. 3925-- ELSIE PARKIN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article !I1 A, Section 100-~0 A.3, Bulk and Parking Regulations in this Division of Land. Property Location: 7575 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 104, Block 04, Lot 27. 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3908-- ROBERT OCHENREITER AND EDWARD LENCESKL Variance for reversal of a build- ing permit to construct a one family dwelling. Property Loca- tion: 565 Bayer Road, Matti- tuck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 139, Block 3, Lot 14. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hcur any and all persons or ~p~senUui~ de- ' siring to be heard in ~tch of the above matters. Written com- ments may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. F, ach hearing will not start before time allot- ted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, please call 765-1809.. Dated: April 9, 1990 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Dorecn Ferwerda IX., 4/12/90 (80) HEARINGS FOR APRIL 19, 1990 - Long Island Watchman Suffolk Times Clerk Bulletin Board Z.B.A. Bulletin Board Environment East, Inc. Richard Lark, Esq. Mr. Murray Jacobs Karen Hagen, Esq. Robert F. Kozakiewicz, Esq. Robert Bohn Ms. Tanya Lachenmer Robert Turner Charles Cuddy, Esq. Mr. Samuel Salzman Legal Notices sent on or about to the following: 3075 Indian Neck Lane Peconic, NY 11958 (for Gordon #3927) PO Box 1033, 7575 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 (for Halla #3914) 1180 Sage Blvd. Greenport, NY (for #3926) 11944 Wickham, Wickham & Bressler Main Road, PO Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 (for Parkin #3925) 616 Roanoke Avenue, PO Box 779 Riverhead, NY 11901 (for Villani #3921) PO Box 55 Peconic, NY 11958 (for Lios #3920) Land Use Co. 2576 Sound'Avenue Baiting Hollow, NY 11933 (for Collins #3919) 1525 Albo Drive Laurel, NY 11948 (#3922) Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 42 Maxwell Road Garden City, NY 11530 ~UDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: JUDITH T. TERRY, SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK RE: ZONING APPEAL NO. 3920, A. LOIS DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1990 Transmitted is applic~tion~or variance submitted by Robert Bohn Contracting on behalf of A. ~,~,,, ~'~g~r with notification to adjacent property owners; Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector; short environmental assessment from; Zoning Board of Appeals Ques. tionnaire From; Deed; and survey of property. · ,; .;.: J d t T. Te ry Southold Town Clerk PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by APplicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPUCANT ISPONSOR 617.21 ~ Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEQR 3. PROJECT LOCATION: __~ 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street acl(Iress a~g roag intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.. or provide ma~'~~~ 5, tS PROPOSED ACTION: I-I Hew I--I Exoa.slon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLy: 7. AMOUNT OF L~NO AFFECTED: ~ Initially -- ~ acre~ Ultimately ~ acre, E. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLy WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? g Y~eYes [] No If No. describe briefly 9. WHAT I RESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~ ~ ~:ntial E) Industrial ',E] Commercial E) Agriculture O Park/Forest/Open space Oescnee: [] Other tO. DOES ACTION JNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL)? ~ [] NO If yes/list agency(s) and permit/approvals ! f* DOE ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROV"-~AL7 ~eEs [] No If ye:~. list agency name an(I permfllapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REOUIRE MODIFICATION? ~0 THE aE~oF MY KNOWLEDGE ~  e action is in the CeCal Area. and reu are a s~ Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with t~ ~S~sm'ent I OVER I (co~&~ued on ~eve~se slde) INSTRUCTIONS. (a) I~order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assumed that the preparer will Use CUrrently available information COncerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional Studies, research Or other investigations will b~ undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be sig- nificant and completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the project is no~ significant. (d} En~vircnmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or ~?es ~nusual land form On the site? ~Yes 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? 4. Will project have a potentially large, impact on 5.Will project significantly effect drainage flow ~Yes on adjacent sites? 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered~-'Yes 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on~YeS air quality? 8. Will project have a major effect on visual char_~Yes octet of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? . Yes 9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct- importance or any site designated as a critical envircomental area by a local agency? .___Yes 10. Will project have a m~jor effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? ~Yes Ii. Will project result in major traffic problems Or Yes 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- 13. Will project have any impact on public health 14. ~ill project affect the existing coR~nunity by charact~r of the community Or neighborhood? P .. -- "trovers coecorning Date:~ TAX MAP DESIGNATION Dm. 1000 $~, 106.00 m~. 01.00 Lot(,):O 14.00I CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BE$ORE SIGNING THIfl iNSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYIRS ONLY. TI{lq IND~A~ruRE,.,adc the 9th day of September, nineteen hundred aad eighty-three JAMES S. YORK and CHRISTINE A. YORK, his wife, both residing at 310 Linda Road, Mattituck, New York party of the first part, and ANDREAS LIOS and KALLIOPE LIOS, his wife, both residing at 992 Ailee Road, North Massapequa, New York party of ~e second part, WITI~iE,S~I-/~ that the par~ of the fist pa~, in con~de~tion of Ten Dollars and ~her paid by the party of the se~nd part, d~s h~eby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or succ~rs and ~s of the party of the second part forever, AI.J. that certain ~ ~e or parcel of land, ~ ~e b~l~s ~d im~ovem~ thereon erectS, situate, ~andbei~inthe Town of Sout_ho~d, County of Suffolk and State of New York, known and designated as Lot 122 in Block 9 as shown on a certain map entitled, "Map of Captain Kidd Estates" and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on January 19, 1949 as Map No. 1672. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed from M.S.T. Construction Corp. dated July 26, 1974 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 30, 1974 in Liber 7685 page 33. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to aay streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the prenfises herein granted unto the party o£ the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of thc first part covenants that the party of the first par~ has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party ot~ the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust {und to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the paymeot of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. .,The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indeniure so requires. IN WITNESS %%q~F, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above · ~am~s-S. York ' J- C rist~ne A. York STATI GE NS.W YORK, COUNTY OE folk ss, On the 9th day of September 19 83 , before me personally came James S. York and Christine A. York, his wife, to me known to be the individual S described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ~'~ey executed the _~me. Notary Public uuffi~ M. GANNON surf Co, No. 4701§94 Tslm Exptles Much 30, ST&TI OE NEW YORK, COUNTy OF ss: On the day of 19 . , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides arno. ; that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. STATE OF NEW YO~OUNTY OE sst On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. STATS OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF On the day of 19 , before me personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, w~s present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto, TITLE NO. YORK LIOS WIFH COVENANT AGAINST GRANtOR'S AC IS 8308-02918 TO SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN TAX BILLING ADDRESS Recorded At Request of The Title Guarantee Company RBTURN BY MAiL TO: JTITLE GUARANTEE- NEWYORK ATICOR COMPANY Philip S. Coundouris, 9 Country Club Drive Port Washington, N.Y. Esq. ziv No. 11050 Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Board of Appeals with your completed application forms. If "Yes" is answered to any questions below, please be sure to depict these areas on your survey (or certified sketch), to scale, and sub,it otiler supporting documenta- tion. ~ 1. Are there any proposals to chang~ o~ alter land contours? 2.a)Are there any areas which Contain wetland grasses? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by Town Code, Ch. 97 for your reference.) b)Are there any areas open to a wate~ay without bulkhead? Are there existing structures at or below ground level, such as patios, foundations, etc? Are there any existing or proposed fences, concrete barriers, decks, etc? If project is proposed for an accessory building or structure, is total height at more than 18 feet above average ground~-~-~l? State total: ft. 6. If project is proposed for principal building or structure, is total height at more than 35 feet above average ground level? State total: ...... ft. ~ 7. Are there other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? If yes, please submit copy of deed. 8. Are there any buildinq permits Pending on this parcel (or abutting land under yourFe~ner~ship, if any)? State Permit ~ .and Nature: 9. Do state whether or not applications are. pending concerning these premises before any other department or agency (State, Town, County, Village, etc.): 10. 11. Planning Board Town Board Town Trustees County Health Degartment Village of Greenport N.Y.S.D.E.C. Other Is premises pending a sale or conveyance? If yes, please submit copy of names or PurChasers and conditions of sale. (from cqnt~act) Is new construction proposed in the area of contours at 5 feet or less as exists? 12. If new construction is proposed in an area within 75 feet of wetland grasses, or land area at an eleva- tion of five feet or less above mean sea level, have · you made application to the Town Trustees for an 'inspection for possible waiver or permit under the requirements of Ch. 97 of the Town Code? Yes Yes ~ Yes Yes ~ Yes Yes~ Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ~ 13. Please list present use~or operatio,~s~ co~ducte~ upo~n subject property at thi~ time ~ ~ and proposed ~ / / Please submit photographs nor ~ne recora. I certify that the above statements are true and are beinq submitted for reliance by the Board of Appeals in considering my application. Szgnanure (Properuy ~wner; [Au~norzzeu 1/88 WETLANDS [,%mencted fl-~G-?t; lay LL ~j.. 13 ~G..q A. TIDAL W~TLANDS: (I) AH ]and~ generally cnv~...d or intermittently c'nv. ered with, ur wi]ich bord.r on, tidal waU~r:,, or I;~nds ' lyin~ beneath tidal ~vatur~. which =t mean Iow tide are covered hy tidal w~ters to A maximum depth 'five (5) feet, inchalln~ hut not limited to Iow lying l~nds subject to ti(iai :etlon: (2) All banks, bags. meadows. HaLs :md HLIAI mar:ih subject ~ such tides ~nd Upon Whieb grows or grow some or any of tim following: salt bay. black grass, saltwort, sea lavender, tall eord~ra~. bush. eaLtails, groundsel, m~rshm;dluw and march cordgrnss; and/or All land ~mmediately aHjacent to ~ tidul wetland defined in Subsection A~2) and lyin~ w~thin seven. iF-five (7~) fee: landward of the most landward edge of such a tklal wetland. FREsIIWATER WETLANDS: (1) "Freshwa~r wetlands" us defined [n Article 2-1. Ti- tle 1, ~ 24-0107, Subdivisions I(~) ~ l(d) inclusive. of the Environme~2~l Conservation ~w of the of New York: and (2) All land ~mmed~atels, ad.latent ~ ;L "freshwater wet- land," us defined in Subsection ~(1) and l)'in~ ~vith- in seVenty-five (75) feet landward of :he mos; land. ward edge of a "fi'eshwal(,r wetland." 9705 JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE TOWN ATTORNEY ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE TOWN A'I'rORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTICE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 PLEASE BE ADVISED DUE TO TWO LAWSUITS AGAINST THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, BROUGHT COLLECTIVELY BY THE NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, SOUTHOLD 2000 AND MESSRS. WEISMANN AND FLYNN, THAT ANY PERMIT, APPROVAL OR ANY OTHER ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, ZONING, MAY BE INVALIDATED BY THE COURT; PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE $OUTHOLD, N. ¥. ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION Date AUGUST 17, 19 89 TO .....H.r. & Hrs. Andrea L£os (Qwner p~' authori[~ed agent of owner) 992 A~lee Eoaa Massapequa, N.Y. 11758 (address of Owner or authorized agent of owner) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE there exists a violation of: Zoning Ordinance CRAP. 100 Other Applicable Laws, Ordinances-'or Regulations at premises hereinafter described in that DECKS AND ADDITIoNs [¢ERE CONSTRUCTED gITROU~ (state Character of violation) A BUILDING PEI~IT AND USED glTHOiIT A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. in violation of ARTICLE X~vIlI CRAP. 100-281 & 100-284. (State section or paragraph of applicable law, ordinance or regulation) YOU ARE THEREFORE DIRECTED AND ORDERED.?o COmply with the law and to remedy the conditions above mentioned ZMHEDTATEL¥ The premises to which this ORDER TO REMEDY VIOLATION refers are situated at 310 LINDA RD., ffATTITUCK, N.Y. ................................................................................ County of Suffolk, New York. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP # 1000-106-01-14 Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. · RDINANCE iNS~i~ECTOR ......... VINCENT R. [/IECZOREK I~B~ NO. m TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) N~ 017q16 Z Permission is hecebyg~,gnted to~ ',4',, ......................................... ...' ... . .................. ,o .....' ~., premises loc,ted o, ........~..../....~.......~..~ ....... ..~.~ ................................................................. County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ..../....~..~.. ......... Block ......... Z ........ Lot No .......... ./.....~.....,. pursuant ,o application dated ................ ..~.../..~... ............ ' ........... , 19.~..~, and approved by the Building Inspector. Fee Rev. 6/30/80 2160. ~'~OPERTY ,LD RECORD CARD t VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT / ~.- '2..-- W ~PE OF BUILDING / 2'0 Wy ~a~ THE THIS CERTIFIES THAT YORK BOARD OF FIRE DERWRITERS BUREAU OF ELECTRICITY /]15 JOHN STREET. NEW YORK, NEW YORK 1OO:3/] Application ~ro. On file F~XTURE OUTLETS DRYERS SWITCHES FIXTURES RANGES OVENS DISH WASHERS EXHAUST FANS MOTORS FUTURE APPLIANCE FEEDERS TIME CLOCKS UNIT HEATERS MULTI-OUTLET DIMMERS SYSTEMS NO. OF FEET SERVICE DISCONNECT OTHER APPARATUS:. S E R C GENERAL MANAGER ' ' Per This certificate must not be altered in any manner; return to the office of the Board if incnrrect. Inspectors may be identified by their credent;~' COPY FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS COPY OF CERTIFICATE MUST NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY COUNTY - SUFFOLK __C_ R _0~ S S R E F E R E N C E ~TOW~ SOUTHoL~- .................... PARCEl. ~-DENTI~iCATiON SWIS - ~.73889 Y CK PARCEL ~ ........... R '~-N'~'M ~ ....... ~ND 106.-1-15 ~C OI MCAVERY JOHN 106.-1-17 CPU KATOS CHRISTOS & WF 60[ ~I~6- J1-18 .............. ~-' ~ N ~'[ L'L~S ~ FRANK ............... '106.-1-21 C MC VREELAND, BARRIE & WF 4,00C '106.-1-23 I 06.-1-24 -----106 ~ ;¥- 25 106.-1-26 ,'. ' )) --1-06. - 1- 27 I 06.-1-29 ~'~106~- 1- 30.1 I 06.-1 ~6~1~31 C MY VREELAND~OELLA K C NO WILLS, FRANK 4,000 C OK WILLS FRAN~ .................. C OH CARLTON JOSEPH 3,800 .............. -C- ~"~EV~N TOM ............... 3~200 C PT CONSTANTOURIS OINOS & 3.200 C RY ORNSTEIN FRANKLIN H & 1~500 C MX-~A~NiDES JO~N~ ................. 1.400 C NT JOANNIDES DEMETRIOS & 800 C MU O~'S~-GEOR~'"'~ ~F- 'i;i-00 106.-1-32 CNN MAZZONI AGNES J 1.10g -- T0-6~;;1;33 ...................... ~-OG-STRA-T[GOS GEORG-E'-T & W ..... 1.100 106.-1-34 COZ THOMAS GEORGE & WF 1,000 106.-1-)6 C QL MESKOURIS JAMES & 1,000 106.-1-~8 C RX KRAWCHUK MYRON & WF 1,500 106.-1-~0 C MT WORK JOHN & WF 1,600 106.-1-42.1 C P9 LEFKOWITZ LEE 1~600 ~6~~ 1 ~4~ 2' ~P-~ M~T R OUEE S -GE OR-GE--B- W .......... 1¥7 O0 106.-1-43 COY TALAS PARIE 1,200 fO-~. - 1'- ~4 .............. C--P~C~N~ I S BY~ON -~ ~F ......... 1;500 106.-1-&5 C QK TSONTAKIS AGLAIA .... 1 06';" 1;46 C--'~BEOOM 'JE ~OME"--E "'~-~ ~700 106.-1-~7 C RW MESKOUR[S CHRIS JAMES 900 ~;; 1;(8 C ~ ~-~A~S ~N~ ~ ~B I L[ 900 106.-2-1 C L[ SAVVEDES NINOS & WF 1,700 ~ 06. - 2~ ~ M~-~E~'~E ~--J 0 ANNE 9 O O 106.-2-3 C MU HU~BS ARTHUR & HARRIET 800 1'06~' 2sT ............ ~--N ~'-[ O~-S ~ ~ ~N G E [~--~'N 0 800 106.-2-5 COG MCG~EEVEY JOHN E & gAT 800 le~.-~-7 C PS KALOGERAS GEORGE & THO --TOG*'2;~ .......... C-~-KATOS 'MARKELL~ ............ 1 106.-2-9 C RE VLAHOS THOMAS & ORS 800 10~-;;2'10 ................... C ~-L-tGNO~ HELEN 600 106.-~-11 C MA CHARALAMBIDES [YRILLOS 105.-2-13 C NM MESKOURIS PETER & WF 1~00~ 106.-2-14 .......... C OF KALOGERAS PARASKEV~ ..... 700 106.-2-!5 COY SARIDAKIS OLGA 700 106~'~'1~ ~-"P~[ E ~-~H U'C~ MA~GA~'~T 700 ..... PAGE ......... TOTAL-S ; ........... &8 P' ~CEL~ (A~[VE~' U STATE OF NEW YORK R E A L COIJNTY - SUFFOLK C TOWN-- OF SOUTHOLO PAR'~L ~D~'N-~T~ SWIS - 47388~ Y CK PARCEL ID 10G.-12-8 C QI KISO PAULA 10~-12-q C Rg BRUNET W~[L~M 10~o-1~-10.2 C MW SARNOWSKI DANIEL PAUL 104.-12-10. & ~0~- 1 2-11 104.-12-1 2.1 -1 ~ . -12-1 2.2 C NS SARN'~'~ -ANN H C O0 SARNOWSKI THOMAS J & A C NM W[DMAYER JOAN ~ ANO C OI KELLER THOMAS C OY MAGUIRE CHARLES C '~'~FS--~F F GE O~GE C PO MONAGHAN KENNETH F & WF C RW GOULD STANLEY R ~ WF 104.-12-18.2 1 o~-t-~-1 104.-1 )-2. 104.-13-3 ---1 104.-13c-$ 1 04.-13-6 C SS GOULD LOUISE C PC SCHULER KENNETH & WF C PY ~ALDW~N-'W~E~3UR A C NH LILLY MICHAEL C OT RATHGEBER KENNETH A ~ 104.-13-? C QF PALMERI FELIX R & WF ---1~.:'i ).~.8 ---: ............. ~-~¥"-~AL[--~t~HARD--A &- ANN 104.-13-9 CRR FUCILE ROSA D &ANO 104:-13'10 ............... C-'~_'U TAEROTT'~O ANN 10~.-1)-11 C MN WATERS JOHN H 105.-1-1 C KJ MACAR[ JOSEPH ~ 05'~;1~2~2 105.-1-3.1 C MR COOPER DOUGLAS A & WF 105~;1;4 .................... ~-'MO'BU~N~--A~THUE ........... 105.-1-5 C NH BRADY WARREN B & WF 105.-1-6.2 C PS CAVALACC[ 8ETTE JOY 10~2'I .................. ~ gZ--SH~NNON JANE' &-ANO 105.-2-2.1 C MO DECH[RICO WILLIAM & EL 106.-1-1.10 C LN DECHIRICO WILLIAM 106.-1-1.12 C NF 9ALLARD JOHN T & WF 106.-1-4 C MX JOOSS AUGUST F & WF '101.-I-6 C OJ VREELAND. BARRIE & WF 106.-1-8 C PV HALKIAS GEORGE & WIFE 106.-1-10 C KR VREHOPOUIOU RODANTHY & 10~.-1-1~ C MD SCOTT JOAN .......... PAGE' TOTAL~ 6,000 6,600 17,100 1. 4,800 6,000 I' 4OO ~,200 6,200 f;~ ?00 400 ~00 ..... 600 '5 O' P l R C E r-s'- ~UO 1,900 FO0 800 900 ~00 700 700 1,100 Z,6OO 1,600 1,600 2,900 3,000 2,900 Z,900 5,800 5.800 2,900 3,100 2,900 22,300 / / // ~ A-C / TOWN CLERK .-D ~...-~ r~/ _ /~x~~:_.'~~'¢'' '~ .7~.~~ BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter or the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: ~ la~'-~ 0(~ NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request ~ (Special Exception) (Special Permit) (Other) [circle choice] 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is Io~cated ad acent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: ~"~C3~-~¥~ ~:~]3~. L'~,J~e_x~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4 lhat h¥ such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article Section [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-way. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you ma), then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: [Copy of sketch or plan purposes,] showing Petitioner Owners'Names: Post Office Address Tel. No. proposal to be at~_~h, ed f, or convenience NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS P 080 612 701 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT 10R INTERNATIONAL MA~I (See Reverse) P~0 612 702 ~£CE~P.~]~9:=OR CERT~RED MA~L P 080 612 667 RECEtPT FOR CERTiFiED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED (See Reverse) Sent to ~lfeet and NO {c~rtified) {registered} m~il. , residing at m,'z~,~O AD, ~'~00%h°t~ , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ¢) ~ day _, 19 ~C~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- ~ of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective osite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by Sworn to ~. me this r-~ ~' day of ,1'9 Notary Public No. 4707878, (This side does not have to be completed on form transmitted to adjoining property owners.) ,I