HomeMy WebLinkAbout4041
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SQoTr L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Appl. No. 4041:
Matter of the Application of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM.
Amendment to Special Exception approval under Appl. No. 3491, in
this Light Industrial (LI) Zone District for permission to
authorize recycling and salvage facility, excavation and
drainage yard (pursuant to Town Board Resolution adopted
April 9, 1991, to be used in conjunction with those uses
conditionally permitted under Special Exception No. 3491
(resolution adopted June 25, 1986) for outside stockpiling of
material and related offices. Location of Property: Lot No. 2
on the Minor Subdivision Map No. 450 of L.B. Glover; 11910
Oregon Road, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map District 1000,
Section 83, Block 3, 4.5 (previously part of 4.4). The total
lot area consists of 4.59 acres.
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on
September 12, 1991, the following action was taken:
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted into the record concerning this
application; and
WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question as well as the
surrounding zoning districts and land-use districts; and
WHEREAS, after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a
Conditioned Negative Declaration under the N.Y.S. Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to this project; and
WHEREAS, this project has received conditional approval for
a Recycling and Salvage Facility Facility from the Southold Town
Board on April 9, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact:
1. By this application, applicant seeks a Special
Exception under the following provisions of the zoning code:
Article XIV, Sections 100-141(A & B), Article XIV, Section
100-140B, applicable to this parcel zoned "LI" Light Industrial
and containing 4.59 acres.
.~%ge 2 - Appl. No. 4041
Matter of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
Decision Rendered September 12, 1991
2. Submitted under this application for consideration are
site plan maps dated February 1, 1990, revised July 2, 1991,
prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. depicting: (a) the
proposed outside area for drainage, stockpiling areas and other
paved areas, portable screening plant, portable commercial wood
chipper, proposed concrete crusher, proposed and existing septic
systems, proposed building and inside loading ramp, roofed
drain, cardinale scale and its housing, drywells, existing water
lines, berm areas, proposed 5' high identification ground sign,
street trees, slatted fence borders (all to meet Planning Board
requirements), grade elevations, leeching pools, parking areas,
lighting information, etc.
3. It is noted for the record that:
(a) the existing uses and buildings, together with
all outside facility areas, also shown on this site plan amended
July 2, 1991, have received conditional approval from the Board
of Appeals, via Special Exception dated June 25, 1986 under
Appl. No. 3491, and via Variance (for front yard setback of
two-story building) on March 5, 1987 under Appl. No. 3595.
(b) the subject premises is located in the Hamlet of
Cutchogue along the south side of Oregon Road (frontage 362.05
ft.) and is known and referred to as Lot No. 4 of the Minor
subdivision of L.B. Glover (Planning Board #450).
4. The premises is adjacent on three sides by other
industrial zoned properties. To the south is the Southold Town
landfill and disposal areas. To the north are properties
located in the Agricultural-Conservation Zone District, with
existing dwellings.
5. It is the position of this Board that:
(a) the proposed recylcing and salvage facilities,
with related amenities, will be in conformity with the Zoning
Code as applies to this Light Industrial Zone District.
(b) the amount of land applied to this proposed use
is more than adequate and will lend to the efficient and safe
circulation for vehicles and pedestrians as well as
maneuverability of equipment and vehicles on the site, and
appropriate located customer and employee parking areas.
(c) extended screening will be provided to reduce
possible noise impacts, and new landscaped areas will be
provided {to meet Planning Board requirements as well};
(d) all runoff and discharge will be into drywells
and leeching basins;
.~age 3 - Appl. No. 4041
Matter of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
Decision Rendered September 12, 1991
6. In considering this application, the Board also finds
and determines: (a) these uses will not alter the essential
character of this industrial area and are in harmony with and
the general purposes and intent of zoning; (b) that these uses
will not be harmful aesthetically or be substantially adverse to
public health, welfare, safety, convenience, or order of the
town; (c) that the proposed uses will not prevent the orderly
and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in
adjacent use districts; (d) the uses are in harmony with and
will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The
Board has also, among other considerations, considered
subsections (A) through (P) of Article XXVI, Section 100-264 of
the Southold Town Zoning Code.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by
Mr. Villa, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception, for a proposed
Recylcing and Salvage Facilities, with related amenities, in
conjunction with the existing authorized uses, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Proposed crusher to be located 150 feet (approximately)
from the rear property line, centered, with appropriate noise
screening that may be required by this Board once the crusher is
placed in operation.
2. Hours of operation, as agreed by the applicant, for the
proposed crusher shall be limited to 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.
3. Chipper not to be used on Saturday or Sunday, as agreed.
4. Piling of waste from cars or other vehicles (i.e.
seats, etc.), when and if stored, shall be of a temporary time
period and shall not be piled at a height of more than 20 feet,
with a location 50 feet or more from the property line(s).
5. No burying of materials shall be authorized without
valid N.Y.S.D.E.C. permits and other agencies having
jurisdiction thereof.
6. Conditions of prior Appl. No. 3595 rendered March 5,
1987 (Grim) and Appl. No. 3491 rendered June 25, 1986 (Grim)
must be complied with.
7. The conditions and limitations under this Special
Exception must be complied with at all times, as well as during
· PBge 4 - Appl. No. 4041
Matter of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
Decision Rendered September 12, 1991
issuance of state, county and other agency permits or
approvals.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:
Goehringer, Dinizio and Villa.
adopted.
Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen,
This resolution was duly
lk
GERARD P. GOEH~INGER, ,~C~AIRMAN
RECEIVED AND FILED BY
THE sOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
Town Clerk, To~n
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following matters
will be held for public hearings before the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
OF APPEALS at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
NY 11971, on THURSDAY AUGUST 15~ 1991~ commencing at the times
specified below:
7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 4043 - JOHN H. AND GAYLE BIRKMIER. Special
Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
100-30B(16) for permission to establish "Bed and Breakfast Use,"
an owner-occupied building, other than a hotel, where lodging
and breakfast is provided for not more than six casual,
transient roomers, and renting of not more than three rooms on
the second-floor of the existing dwelling structure. Location
48850 Main Road, $outhold, NY; County Tax Map No.
1000-70-07-10.
7:35 P.m. Appl. No. 4044 - WILLIAM, AILEEN AMD JOHN PARROTT.
Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section
100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, for approval of
deck construction at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead and in
Page 2 - Legal No~ Hearings
Regular Meeting of August 15, 1991
Southold Town Board of Appeals
excess of the 20% lot coverage limitation for all structures.
The subject parcel is substandard in size and is located in the
R-40 Zone District. Location of Property: 2435 Cedar Lane,
East Marion; County Tax Map No. 1000-37-4-9.
7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4045 - GLORIA LOWERY. Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4(B) for
permission to construct open-deck addition to dwelling structure
with a setback at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The
subject parcel is substandard in size and is located in the
R-40 Zone District. Location of Property: 650 Oak Avenue,
Southold, NY; County Tax Map No. 1000-77-1-2. Also referred to
as Lot Nos. 285, 284, 283, 282, and part of 281 on the Map of
Goose Bay Estates (1934).
7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 404~ - MR. AND MRS. THOMAS M. McKEON.
Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244B
for permission to construct addition with breezeway and garage
which will be in excess of the 20% lot coverage limitation. The
subject parcel is substandard in size and is located in the R-40
Zone District. Location of Property: 415 Fisherman's Beach
Road, Cutchogue; also referred to as Lot 7 on the Map of Peconic
Bay Properties, Inc. (1931); County Tax Map No. 1000-111-1-26.
7:53 p.m. Appl. No. 4048 - BURT LEWIS, JR. Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 and Article XXIV,
Page 3 - Legal Noti¢.~of Hearings
Regular Meeting of August 15, 1991
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Section 100-243 for approval of office addition resulting in an
expansion of the existing noncohforming use and increasing the
degree of nonconformance of the building setback in the front
yard area. The subject parcel is substandard in size and is
located in the Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) Zone District.
Location of Property: 6920 Main Road, Laurel, NY; County Tax
Map No. 1000-126-01-4.1; also referred to as Lot Nos. 1 & 2 on
the Map of George I. Tuthill (1929).
8:15 p.m. Appl. No. 4041 - DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM. Amendment~
to Special Exception approval undler Appl. No. 3491, in this /
/
Light Industrial (LI) Zone District for permission to authorize
recycling and salvage facilitiy, excavation and drainage yard
(pursuant to-Town Board Resolution adopted April 9, 1991, to be
used in conjunction with those uses conditionally permitted \
under Special EXception ~o.~ 3491 (ZBA resolution adopted ~ \
June 25, 1986) for outside stockpiling of material and related~
offices. Location of Property: Lot No. 2 on the Minor ~
Subdivision Map No. 450 of L.B. Glover; 11910 Oregon Road, ~
~~ ~9 ~ Tax Map No. 1000-83-3-part of 4.4, ~
8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 4042 - LAWRENCE CERVON. Variance to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for
permission to construct addition to dwelling with a setback at
less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. Location of Property:
Page 4 Legal Notic~of Hearings
Regular Meeting of August 15, 1991
Southold Town Board of Appeals
25235 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No.
1000-126-11-21. The subject parcel is substandard in size and
is located in the R-40 Zone District.
8:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3959 - MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH HARDY.
Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-92,
for permission to increase the degree of nonconformance of the
lot area for the establishment or approval of a second dwelling
unit in an existing dwelling structure and for the establishment
or approval of a third dwelling unit in the rear accessory
building, both in conjunction with multiple business uses and
existing single-family residential unit of this substandard
parcel. Location of premises: 13500 Main Road, Mattituck, NY;
County Tax Map ID No. 1000-114-11-5. The
nonconforming in this Hamlet Business (HB)
containing approximately~one-half acre of
subject parcel is
Zone District
total lot area.
8:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3959 - MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH HARDY. Special
Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section
100-91B(2)(4) to permit either an accessory apartment or second
dwelling unit over stores, or alternatively to permit multiple
dwelling use within the existing mixed business/residential
structure. Location of premises: 13500 Main Road, Mattituck,
NY; County Tax Map ID No. 1000-114-11-5.
nonconforming in this Hamlet Business (HB)
containing approximately one-half acre of
The subject parcel
Zone District
total lot area.
is
'Page 5 - Legal Notic~f Hearings
Regular Meeting of August 15, 1991
Southold Town Board of Appeals
8:50 p.m. Appl. No. 4039 - CLIFFSIDE ASSOCIATES. Appeal for an
Interpretation under the Definition Section of the Zoning Code,
Article I, Section 100-13 as noticed to the adjoining property
owners, as pertains to dwelling and/or motel uses, and the
installation of cooking facilities. Location of Property:
61475 County Road 48, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map Parcel ID
1000-045-01-001 and 002 (2.1), containing approximately 7.5
acres. Zone District: Resort Residential (RR).
The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any
and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the
above matters. Written comments may also be submitted prior to
the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not
start before'the times designated above. For more information,
please call 765-1809.
Dated: July 25, 1991.
BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
By Linda Kowalski
TO: Times-Review Delivered 8/5/91
L.I. Traveler-Watchman For Publication
JUL ! G 1961
,dI~wN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION
Application No.
~mdil l~nCk~k Date Filed:
TO THE ZONING BOARD 0]~ APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK:
(Resi'dence, House No. and Street)
(Hamlet, S~ate, Zip Code, Te]ephon~ Numbe~)
hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ¢o~ a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance ~ith
the
ZONING
ORDINANCE,
for the be~o~-desc~bed p~ope~ty for the fo~]o~ng uses and purposes (and as sho~n on
the attached p]an dra~n to sca]e):
A. Statement of Ownership and Interest.
~-'. ~ ~L~ .~_~'l_ ~la_ ~__~]¢iV~-,_ __is(~re) the owner(s) of
property known and referred to as t~1o C,¥~
- ~ ~, , _ JJJouse No., Street, Hamlet)
identified ~n t/be SuffolkfCounty Tax Maps as District 1000, Section __~_~_, Block
Lot(s) ~l-,b , which is not ~ on a subdivision Map (Filed ,
"Map of "Filed Map No.
and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on
as a ~[Major] Subdivision).
The above-described property was acquired by the owner on
B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with
the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to
the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to
property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons:
C. ~be property which?s the subject of this application is zoned
[-v/J is consistent wi'~h the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being
furnished herewith.
L ] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith
for the following reason(s):
and
[ ] is vacant land.
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORKi ss.:
'~d Ts1 gna'~'u~el
sworn to before me this /~ ay of ~z_~ 9~/.
ry P~] ic~ .._
ZB2 (rev. 2/6/86) ~~~--~=L
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD
CARD
OWNER
FORMER OWNER
STREET
VI LLAGE
SUB. LOT
ACR. J
TYPE OF BUILDING
RES.
LAND
Tillable
Woodland
SEAS.
IMP.
VL
TOTAL
(
FARM
DATE
~?~. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value
REMARKS
FRONTAGE ON WATER
FRONTAGE ON ROAD
Meadowland DEPTH
House Plot // ,, BULKHEAD
9
Total
Extension
Extension
e
Extension F ire Place Heat
Porch ~ Pool Attic
Deck Patio Rooms 1st Floor
Breezeway Driveway Rooms 2nd Floor
Foundation, Bath
Basement Floors
Ext. Walls Interior Finish
Maps which are a part of the Donald Grim ZBA files are:
Appl. No. 3595
12/5/86 Proposed Site Plan prepared by SeaLand Surveyors & Engineering.
Appl. No. 3595
10/28/86 Proposed Site Plan prepared by SeaLand Surveyors & Engineering
3/10/86 " " .... "
Copy of 1982 Subdivision Map for Leander Glover
Appl. No. 4041
February 1, 1990 Site Plan prepared by Peconic Surveyors.
Also included under Appl. No. 4041 was a FEAF part 3 prepared by H2m Group dated
October 1991 received from Planning Board (Lead Agency). Document is 100+ pages.
Other files available:
Appl. No. 3491 6/25/86 Outside Storage building, stockpiling to Oak Street Trucking
(Grim).
Appl. No. 3054 Parcel size variance in C-1 Zone District for L. Glover, Jr. 11/18/82 for
pending subdivision of entire 15+ acres.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, .Ir., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOT'f L. HARRIS
SuperviSor
Town Hall 5309~ Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (5t6) 765-1823
october 31, 1991
RE: Oregon Road Recycling
SCTM~1000-83-3-4.5
Cutchogue, NY
Dear Reviewer:
On August 12, 1991, the Southold Town Planning Board
started the coordination process on this proposal to develop a
recycling and salvage facility.
Shortly thereafter, we asked the applicant to complete Part
III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to
provide the additional information that would be needed to reach
adetermination.
In order to assist you in your review, we have enclosed a
corrected Part I, a completed Part II and the recently completed
Part III, along with a revised site plan (dated as received:
July 22, 19991).
Please respond with issues of concern within thirty (30)
days of the date of this letter. .L
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Board of Kppeals ~
Building Department
Southold Town Board
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
CRAMER VOOR H I S, ~;;,~,~.~ O C IAT E S
ENVIRONMENT,'~~G CONSULTANTS
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re:
Oregon Road Recycling Co.
SCTM No: 1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receipt of your letter of August 12, 1991, requesting that we complete a
review of theproposed project including review and correction of the Part I EAF,
completion of the Part II EAF, and consultation as to how to proceed with review of this
project in accord with the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
Please be advised that we have reviewed the documentation forwarded to this office.
A copy of the corrected Long EAF Part I, and the completed Long EAF Part II are included
as an attachment to this letter. In addition, we have inspected the site and offer the
following information with regard to review procedures.
The site is presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose of
excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening and offices. This use is being conducted
in accord with a previously approved site plan as well as Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization. The proposed use involves the addition of recycling .fa. cilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fired removal, crushing or
cutting) and shipping off the site.
In terms of existing site and environmental resources, soils and vegetation have been
modified. The site is predominantly rock, earth and fill; however some landscaping has been
completed near the road frontage. There were no significant vegetation or wildlife resources
identified. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone IV and is in the northern
border of the Water Budget Area designated by SCDHS. The depth to groundwater is
approximately 60 feet, and groundwater beneath the site migrates north. It is noted that
.mtrate and aldicarb contamination have been identified in the vicinity of the site, and there
~s a landfill upgradient of the site which is under investigation to determine impact on the
aquifer. It is suspected that the landfill site may have caused groundwater degradation.
The site is zoned for industrial use. The area surrounding the site, east to Cox's
Land, west approximately 750 feet to Depot Land and south to North Road is also zoned
industrial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area. The area north of Oregon
Road is zoned "A-C" district. Land use conflicts of the transition from industrial to "A-C"
district were considered by the Planning Board in the previous site plan approval which
required a 100 foot setback for the facility from Oregon Road. The subject application
should also be reviewed in the context of minimizing impacts from this transition. The roads
54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
Page 1 of 3
Oregon Road Recycling
Environmental Review
in the area include Oregon Road (east-west mino. r road to north), Cox's Lane (north-south-
minor road to west), Depot Lane (north-south m~nor road to east), and North Road (east-
west 4 land divided highway to south). These roads are presently underutilized; however,
expansion industrial uses in the area and potential conflict with residential street traffic
should be considered in connection with the proposed project.
The Town Board has considered this action in the authorization of a Recycling and
Salvage Facility under Town Code Section 48-1. The use is consistent solid waste
management goals of reducing the waste stream through recycling; however, impacts with
regard to the specific use must be considered. The Town Board recognized this and
included many conditions of the approval for this use. These conditions are included in a
Conditioned Negative Declaration for the use dated March 1, 1991. The nine (9) conditions
incl.uded in the determination provide the Planning Board with a basis for review of the
project.
Based upon review of the conditions, and the information presented to date, we find
that a Part III Long EAF should be prepared to address concerns with regard to the specific
site use. The Long EAF Part III is recommended as a means of addressing specific concerns
prior by providing additional information necessary to render a Determination of
Significance with regard to this action. The Part II EAF indicates the impact areas - in
addition, specific requests for information are keyed to the nine (9) Town Board conditions
as follows:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
The applicant should provide a detailed site plan indicating the location of all
structural site improvements (including concrete/asphalt crusher. As of the date of
this letter, we have not received this information.
Preliminary review of the noise data indicatepossible impact due to noise levels. The
location of the equipment must be known to determine levels at locations from the
machinery. In addition, sound barriers (if needed) or sound reduction equipment
which may be available as an accessory on the equipment should be explored. In
addition, we find no information concerning dust emissions from equipment as
required by the Town Board.
e applicant should provide a covenant regarding hours of operation. An update of
e status of this mitigation measure required by the Town Board should be provided.
The source of recycling material should be indicated in order to assess compliance
with previous conditions of the operation.
A program for mitigation of noise, dust, odors, and vectors should be provided by the
applicant in order for the Town to have a means of dealing with complaints and ~ssues
should they arise..
The basis for vehicle trip ends should be prowded. The peak hourly trip generation
should be indicated. In addition, the primary hours of expected truck ingress and
egress to the site should be indicated.
The status of the waste oil containment shed approval should be indicated. Plans for
construction of this facility should be provided.
The means of disposal of collected fluids should be indicated. If an industrial waste
scavenger is proposed to be used, the name of the scavenger should be provided.
The applicant should provide a covenant regarding allowed access to the site by Town
Officials and/or legitimately designated Town representatives. An update of the
status of this mitigation measure required by the Town Board should be provided.
CRAMER. VOORHIS,, &,:::~.'.'SSOCIATES
E NVIR O N M E NT~/#/~t~ G CONSULTANTS
Page 2 of 3
Oregon Road Recycling
Environmental Review
The information requested above should be provided by the applicant. Information
should be submitted in the basic format of a Part III Long EAF providing a discussion of the
significance of the impact and pr.oposed mitigation to minimize the impact. I believe that
the applicant is best able to provide this information for review by the Board. If you wish
CVA to review the submitted documentation, we would be pleased to provide a cost
estimate to review the material once submitted.
Thank you for the opportunit~ to provide you with this review, and please do not
hesitate to callif you have any questions.
Very tm~Jy yours,
'E TANTS
Page 3 of 3
[, ART 1--PROJECT INFORMATIgd
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant ef
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to the~e questions will be eons[d(
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any add[tie
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAr will be dependent on information currently available and will not inw
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spa
each instance.
NAM6 OF ACTION
LOCATI~ OF A~TION (include Slr{~ess M~nicipali y ~ County}
NAME OF APPLIOANTISPONE ' "(
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
STATE ZiP CODE
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable ~ ~O¢~ ~ ~0~'.
A. Site Description
Physical settin8 of overall project, both~e~eloped and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ~Urban ~lndustrial ~Commercial ~Residential (suburban) ~Rural (non-far
~Fore~t ~A~riculture ~Other
2. Total acreage of project area: "/, O~'
acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meado;v or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces'
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
O. 3 acres (:2, g ~ acres
acres
-- acres
acres ' '
acres
acres
r /'/' ~ acres _~,, c~ -- acres
(~'/ acres ~ acres
Other (Indicate type) ~___e_ czpproYrc~ ~:~¼ p[~,~ O,/
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~]Yes [~o ~
a. What is depth to bedrock? --~00~ (; feet) ~
· . S. p~O~ate percentage ot propos,~¢'~ ~otect s,t~ with slopes: ~00-10% °,6 (~10-15% _
· s4~rolect substantially contiguous to. or co,o~in a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Natior
Registers of Historic Places? []Yes I~'No
7. ls project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National r'L~'~Landmarks? EYes
8. What is the depth of the water table? '~o- ~-~i~ ~'~' ~
9. Is s~te located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [:]Yes ~ N~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? {l-lYes []~/o
11. Does project site_~tain'any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere
Identify each species
12. Are there any uni,~, or unusual land forms on the project site? (i~e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatior
EYes ~wo Describe
13. Is the project site_j[;~esently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are~
[:]Yes IdNo If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
I-lyes - [~No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a.-Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name b. Size (in acres)
17. Is the site served by'~xisting p~b c utilities? [~Yes ENo
a) If Yes, does sufficient ca'pacity exist to allow connection? [~es fqNo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I-lYes
18. Is the site located in an agricultural,district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-A/
Section 303 and 304? [qYes
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous~tc~ a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article E
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~ r-lYes [~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? EYes ~o
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or c,o~,~rolle,~y project sponsor
b. Project acreage to be developed: ~f'~ % , acres initially; z~ .~"~-
c. Project acreage to remain unde/~,!oped /,,,,/o nC_ acres.
d. Length of project, i0 miles: /',J//:F (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ,
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing /~ ~; proposed .. ·
· g. Maximum vehicular trips ~enerated per hour -~'
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family
Initially
Ultimately -' -
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure '~'?~--' height; . z~C3 width; ~ length.
j. Linear feet of fro.ntage along a public thoroughfare project wdl Occupy is? -~('2,~t.
3
acres.
acres ultimately·
(upon completion of projectJ?
Muhiple Fa~rlily Condominium
.2..How much natural ateria~ t .e...r~,.~, earth, ',¢t.c.) wdl,be removed from the teZ
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? []Yes ~ ~o ~N/A tons/cubic yards
a. If yes, for what intend~Z purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? I-lYes
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l-lYes
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~-~ acres·
~. YViJI any mature~oTest (over 100 years (~ld)or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this F-lyes [5~No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction (~ months, (including ~emolition).
7. If multi-phased: /,,////~ ' tb'v~,.~ ,(~' C~-~' ~
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number)· .c~'/~:~..//g~ ~/-~//~/Z'/~
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month year, (including demolition)·
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. ·
d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? f-lyes I-lNo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes NE~o
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction /k///~
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
; after project is complete ~//"~
/
DYes N~o
If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D-Wes IglOo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount'
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ~
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal nvolved? D-IYes ~o Type
· 14. Will surface area of an e~xisting Water body increase or decrease by proposal? I~Yes Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood p ain;~ r'lYes []~o
16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes ~ "
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste fa~:ility be used? []Yes I-INo
c. If yes, give name '; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfill? [~es I-'lNo
,17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?' DYes [~No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month· ..
b. Ii yes, What is the anticipated site life? . years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? (l-lYes
19. Will project routinely I~roduce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~lyes
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambien~poise levels? [3Yes
21. Wdl project result in an increase in energy use? [Yes [~No
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _
23. Total anticipated ,:ater usage per day ~¢'~ gallons/day
24. Does project invol,, Local, State or Federal funding, UYes
If Yes. explain
4
·" 2.5. Approvals Required: Submitl.
T pe
~/o~.ff,,f../_. ,,~l"~ ~-t'-- Date
City. Town, Village Board ~es
City, Town, Village Planning Board ~es ~o
City, Town Zoning Board DYes
City, County Health Department ~es ~o ~/~
Other Local Agencies ~Yes ~o /
Other Regional Agencies : . ~Yes ~o
State Agencies ~s ~No
Federal Agencies ~Yes ~o ~ ~Y~ ~O~ ~O
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ,~s
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Clzoning amendment I-Izoning variance . mspecial use permit ~subdivision ,~te plan
I-lnew/revision of master plan J-lresource management plan I-[other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L-~_.. '
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radius of proposed action~
8' Is 'he pr°p°sed acti°n c°mpatible with adj°ining/surr°unding land uses within ai~?2ile? [~es
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how m/ny lots are proposed? '
a. What is the minimum lot siz~ proposed;' /~/,,~-
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? i-lYes
11. Will the proposed act~,o create ,a'demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, poll
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [~es [2.go
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes
· a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? EYes J~No.
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any advm
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate
avoid them.
E. Verification ~ - 2_~-g/
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge
If the ac/i /] J'~
onjs in the Coastal {~rea, and you are a slate agency, complele the CoaslaJ Assessmenl Form before proceedh
wilh Ihis aSsessmenl.
5
Part 2--PRC.'~CT IMPACTS AND THEIR MA~IITUDE
Ge~fal Informati~ (Read Carefully)
In completing t~ form
fea~blel The revi~ef is not ex~ct~ to ~ an ex~R envi~mental anal~t.
Identifyini that an impact will ~ ~tentially large (column 2) ~s ~t mean t~t it is al~ necessarily ~l~fi~.
Any large impact must ~ evaluat~ in P~RT 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simp
asks that it
T~ Examples provided are to assist t~ reviewer by showing
m~nitude that w~ld ~i~er
for most situations. Bu~ for any s~cific proiect or site ot~r ~mp~ a~ ~r ~res~lds may ~ appr~
f~ a Potential Large Impact r,~, ~us ~uiHnl ~aluat~ in Pa~ 3.
T~ Impac~ of each ~oj~ on each site, in each I~li~, will va~. T~mf~, ~ examples a~ illustrate· ar
~ ~n offer~ as guidance. T~ ~ ~t c~stitute an exhaus~ list ~ im~ a~ ~lds to an~ each qu~
The numar of examples ~r question d~s not indicate the im~ance of each q~ti~.
In identifying impact, consider Ion~ term, sho~ term and cumlative eff~.
I~tru~iom (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Y, if t~e will ~ a~ impa~
b. Maybe answers should ~ consider~ as Y~ answers.
c. If answering Y~ to a question then c~ck the appropriate ~x (column I ~ 2) to i~icate ~ ~tential size of t
impact. If impact threshold ~uals or exc~s any example pro~, c~k column 2. If impact will ~cur but thresh¢
is I~er than example, c~ck column 1.
d. If mvi~er has d~bt a~t size of ~ impact ~en conside~ ~ gm.ct as ~t~lly lar8e and p~ to PART
e. If a ~tentially large impact c~ck~ in column 2 can ~ miti~t~ ~ c~ni(sJ ~ ~ Foist to a small ~ ~rz
impa~ al~ c~ ~ Ym ~x in column 3. A No res~n~ i~i~tm ~t ~ a ~u~n is ~t ~s~le. T:
. must ~ explain~ in Pa~ 3..
IMPACT ON LAND ......
1. Will the proposed actio~ result in a physical chan~e to [J~ project sit~
/l~O I-WES
Example's that would apply to column 2
· Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ~ 100
foot of lenl~th), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
· Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
· Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
· Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within
3 feet of existing ground surface.
· .Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involw more
than one phase or stage.
· Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (i.e.., rock or soil) per year.
· Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
· Construction in a desii~nated floodway.
· Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect t~. _.~y unique or unusual land o~,~,ms foond on
the site~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etcANO I~JYES
· Specific land forms:
6
I 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact
Moderate Large Mitigated B
- IY-~Oa~t' Impact Project Cha~
n I-I OYes I--ih
O 0 OYes
0 0 OYe~
O [] OYes
[]] O OYes
0 O OYes
0 [] OYes
0 0 OYes
[] O OYes
0 [] OY~
IMPACT ON WATER
1 Will proposed action affect any water Ix~y designated as protected~'
(Under Articles 1S. 24.25 of the Environmental Conserv~at,ionLaw. ECL)
OYES
Example~ that would apply to column 2
· Developable area of site contains a protected water body,
· Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected stream.
· Extension of utility distrib~io~ facilities through a p~otected water body.
· Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
· Other impact~:
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? DNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increaSe or decrease.
· Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
· Ot~er impacts:
5. Will PropoSed Action affect surface or groundwater
qualitY or quantity~ [:]NO /~ES
Ex~mpJes that would apply t~ colurrm 2
· Proposed Action will require ~ discharge permit.
· Proposed Action requires uSe of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve prul:X)se~:L (project)action.
· Propo~,,cl Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45
gallons per minute pumping Capacity.
· Construction or operation causing a~' contamination of a water
supply system.
· Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
· Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities wh;ch presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
· proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per
day.
· Proposed Action will likel,' cause siltation or other discharge into an
existing body of wat¢~ [~, the ~.>:~cnt that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
· Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
· Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
and/or sewer services.
· Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
.~. Will proposed action alter drainag~ flow or patterns, or surface
I., water runoffi [:]NO r'lyE S
Ex.~.-'nple~ that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would change floo~ water flows.
7
Small to
Moderate
Impact
O
O
O
0
[]
FI-
D
0
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
2
Potential
Large
Impact
O
[]
O
O
D
O
O
O
O
O
O
[]
[]
O
O
[]
Can Impact B~
Mitigated By
Project Chang=
OYes ONo
OYes r'JNo
DYe~ nNc
OYes I-]Nc
DYes linc
OYes ONe
OYes liN'
OYes I--IN,
OYes
OYes
.r~Yes
OYes
OY~
OYes
[:]Yes li
· Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
· Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
· Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.
· Other impactS:
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I-1NO
E~ample~ that would apply to column 2
· Pro~s~ Action will induce 1,~ or more vehicle ~ips in any given
· Pressed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of
refu~ ~r hour.
· Emission rate of total contaminan~ will exc~d 5 lbs. ~r h~r or a
~at source pr~ucing more than 10 million BTU's ~r ~r.
· Pro~s~ action will allow an increa~ in the amount of la~ committ~
to industrial use.
· Pro~s~ action will allow an increase in the densi~ of i~us~ial
~velopment wigan existing i~usuial areas.
IMPACT ON P~S AND ANIMUS
8. Will Pro~s~ Action aff~t any t~eate~ ~ e~a~
s~c~? ~O ~YES
E~mpl~ ~t W~Id apply to column 2
· R~u~ of o~ or ~re s~i~ list~ on t~ N~ Yo~ ~ F~eral
list, using t~ site, over or ~ar site or f~ on ~ site.
· Removal of any ~ion of a critical or significant wildlife habi~L
· Application of ~sticide or herbicide more than ~ice a year, other
~an for agricultural pu~s.
· Other
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect norrthreat~.n~d or
non-endangered species? .,J~O i-lYES
Example~ that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
· Proposed Action requires the removal et more titan 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land r?o~urces~
/,~O OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
I rI 2 3
Small t~ Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
[] I--I [~Yes I-]No
[] [] I--lYes [-1No
[] [] I-lYes [-]No
r-I [] []Ye []No
[3 [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes
[] [-] ['-~Yes []No
[] [3 1:3Ye []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes []No
[] [] []Yes F~No
[] [] [:]Yes []hmo
[:] [] []Yes []No
· Construction activity would excavate or comp·ct the soil profile of
agricultural land.
· The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of airicultural land,
· The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface dr·in lines, outlet ditches,
strip croppin~ o~ create a need for such measures (e.g. cause · farm
field to dr·in poorly due to increased runoff)
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ,~O (DYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Sec~tion 617.21,
Appendix B.) '
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether*
man-made or natural. ,
· Propcr~'~ land uses, or project components visible't0 users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or slgnificant[y reduce their
· enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that re~ource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of~istoric, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? /lg~O I-lYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
· Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
· Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
· Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities~
Examples that would apply to column 2
OYES
)The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
"-~'A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
· Other impacLs:
I 2 3
Small td Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 I--1 [3Yes ONo
[3 [3 -]Yes [3No
[3 [-I [3Yes []No
I-] [3 []Yes [3No
O [3 [3Yes I-'INo
[] iD [3Yes [3No
[3 I-1 [3Yes [3No
[3 [] [:3Yes []No
l--1 [] []Yes
[] [] [3Yes []No
[3 I-] [3Yes (:]No
[3 I--I [3Yes
[] [3 [3Yes r-lNo
IMPACT ON TRANSP~. RTATION
14. will there be an effect to existing transportation systems/
E,amples that would apply to column 2
· Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods.
· Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
· Other impacts:
IMPACq' ON ENEROY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sou~r~ of fuel or
energy supply/ /~O nYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action wiU cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
· Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use.
· Other impacts:'
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odor~, noise, or vibration as a r~_e~ult
of the Proposed Actk~/ DNO :.~ES~
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Blasting within 1.500 feet ~f a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
· Odor~ will occur routinely (more than one hour per day)-
· Proposed Ac~:x~ will produce oper'~fing noise exceeding the local
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
· Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
· Other impacts: j~)/'~t3,7'~r_..~7- /~.//~. C,f,~,.(,,'~' .A/,")l-~_-~"
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH lb ~VT?/"~ e~O
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety/
FqNO ~ES
Examples that would apply to column 2
· Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level
discharge or emission.
· Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
· Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
gas or other flammable liquids.
· Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 te~t of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
· Other impacts: 7'&~r~-t~ y~cT.~,OJ'~.~'~, ~
10
Small to
Moderate
Impact
0
0
0
[3
[]
[]
[]
2
Potential
Large
Impact
0
O
0
O
[]
0
[]
[]
Can Impact
Mitigated By
Project Chang~
OYes ONo
OYes linc
OYes [:]Nc
I-lYes ONe
OYes ON,
[3Yes []N
OYes lin
OYes
OYes Oh
[]Yes i~[
[3Yes ["]~
OYes O:
[-']Yes []
[3Yes []
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Prepared for:
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Prepared by:
H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
OCTOBER 1991
it / GROUP
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS · SCIENTISTS · SURVEYORS
MELVILLE, N.Y. TOTOWA. N.J.
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
OCTOBER 1991
Proposed Action:
Location:
Applicant:
Lead Agency:
Contact:
~reparer:
Contact:
Date of Preparation:
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING INC.
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Action involves the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and
demolition debris, automobiles, landscaping yard
waste and trash. Proposed facilities include a
concrete/asphalt crusher and a concrete automobile
crushing pad to be added to the existing excavation
and drainage facility on site.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
Town of Southold
SCTM #1000-83-03-4.5
Mr. & Mrs. D. Grim
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
Andrew P. Freleng, AICP
October 28, 1991
Availability of Document: The pages which follow constitute Part 3 of
the Full Environmental Assessment Form submitted by the appli-
cant to the Town of Southold, 12/11/90. Copies are available
for public review and comment at the office of the Lead
Agency. Comments should be submitted to the Lead Agency
listed above to be included in the public record.
C_ OUP
Pursuant to correspondence received by the Applicant from
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of the Planning Board of the
Town of Southold, this Part 3 of the Full Environmental
Assessment Form is herewith submitted. As directed, all items
enumerated in correspondence to the Planning Board from the
Board's consultant, Cramer, Voorhis and Associates (CVA), have
been addressed in this Part 3 submittal. Appendix A of this
Part 3 includes correspondence from the Planning Board and
their consultant.
The proposed action is the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and demolition
debris, automobiles, landscaping yard waste and trash. Pro-
posed facilities include a concrete/asphalt crusher, a con-
crete automobile crushing pad, a hazardous waste storage
building, solid waste sorting building and trucking to be
added to the existing excavation and drainage facilities on
site.
1.0 Site Plan
It was requested that the applicant provide a detailed
site plan indicating the location of all proposed structural
site improvements. A plan has been submitted, dated February
1, 1990, which was stamped received by the Planning Board July
22, 1991, and forwarded to the Board's consultant, Cramer,
Voorhis and Associates, subsequent to the consultant's letter
-1-
GROUP
ties
requesting this item.
2.0 Noise
Concern was raised about the impact to adjacent proper-
from noise levels associated with equipment operation at
the subject site. The subject parcel has been characterized
by the Town's environmental consultant as being situated in an
industrial area east from the site to Cox Lane, west from the
site to Depot Lane and south to North Road. North of the sub-
ject parcel, opposite Oregon
Intermittent industrial uses
area. Most significant is the
Road, is Residential zoning.
are dispersed throughout the
Southold Town Landfill south of
project site. Between the landfill and the southern reaches
of the subject parcel is the truck yard for North Fork Sanita-
tion. This 5.1 acre parcel both shields the subject site from
the noise of the landfill and creates its own noise from truck
movements during its hours of operation.
Existing ambient noise sources consist of equipment
activity at the landfill, the present soil screening plant in
use on the subject site, as well as noise from truck and pas-
senger motor traffic on Oregon Road. Irrigation pumps from
surrounding land uses also contribute to the ambient noise.
Fly-bys of crop spraying planes and helicopters intermittently
contribute to the ambient noise in the area of the subject
parcel.
-2-
GROUP
Ambient noise in the area of a landfill/industrial area
can range 40-90 decibels (dB), dependent upon the time of day
and distance to equipment, moving trucks and other vehicles
(McLean, 1988; Stanton, 1987; Warren, 1985). Ambient noise is
a function of distance as well. Sound propagation from source
to receiver can be attenuated by the properties of the atmo-
sphere and the presence of any objects or barriers in the
transmission path, such as vegetation, change in topography,
buildings, etc. The sound pressure level generated by a noise
source decreases with increasing distance from the source due
to wave divergence (Rau, 1980).
The intensity of sound generally decreases inversely to
the square of the distance to the point source. The absorp-
tion factor is an empirical number which varies with ground
surface. If the ground cover is vegetated or has a soft tex-
ture, sound will decrease at a rate of 4.5 dB every time the
distance between the source and the receptor is doubled. If
the ground between the source and observer is paved or hard,
then the drop-off rate is only approximately 3 dB every time
the distance is doubled (Rau, 1980).
The shielding factor is another empirical number which
takes into account the environment surrounding the source and
the receptor. The shielding factor states that for every 30
-3-
meters of very dense landscape vegetation (at least 15 feet
high), 5 dB of additional attenuation can be obtained up to a
maximum of l0 dB.
Noise data from machines representative of the one pro-
posed to be utilized on site, was provided by West Texas CAT
Power Systems 7/31/91 (Appendix B).
the provided data that noise levels
accordance with the above theories.
consistent with studies conducted
and Warren '85.
Noise levels then, can be
It can be observed from
decrease more or less in
The data provided is also
by McLean '88, Stanton '87
predicted for the proposed
action based on the information provided above, the location
of the proposed crusher and the distance to all property lines
or sensitive receptors.
The proposed concrete crusher is to be
140 feet west of the eastern property line,
western property line, 340'
pavement of Oregon Road and
erty line.
Without a vegetative buffer along the
erty lines, it is anticipated, utilizing
that noise would be approximately 76-78 dBA.
tative buffer, noise would be expected at
situated roughly
152' east of the
south of the northern edge of
260' north of the southern prop-
east and west prop-
the above formula,
With a 10' vege-
the lower end,
-4-
Gt OUP
around 76 dBA. The northern edge of Oregon Road can be antic-
ipated to have noise level readings from the crusher of less
than 60 dBA, due to the greater distance, the presence of a
vegetative buffer and existing berm and existing and proposed
buildings. At the southern property line, noise can be
expected to be less than 70 dBA, due to the rise in topography
in the most northern corner and the 50' vegetated distance
from the edge of bluestone pavement to the property line.
The car crushing operation is simply no more than a pay-
loader pushing the roof flat on a vehicle for stacking pur-
poses and loading onto an awaiting trailer. The most signifi-
cant noise source would be from the diesel engine of the
machine, around 76 dBA at the western property line, without
any vegetative screening. Noise would be significantly
reduced in any other direction due to the mass of the build-
ings in the existing area of the pad.
A review of ordinances to control noise pollution pro-
vides the following: The Code of the Town of Southold pro-
vides no local guidance on noise regulation other than the
prohibition of offensive noise. The Towns of Southampton and
Brookhaven have ordinances which are well-developed (see
McLean '88; Warren '85). Based on distances to the proposed
-5-
Gr ouP
a rationale for noise mitigation
of this EAF
machinery to property lines,
can be approached and is discussed in Section 5.0
Part 3.
3.0 Covenant on Hours of Operation
The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated
between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. A covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition shall be filed by the
applicant to the satisfaction of the Town.
4.0 Source of Recvclina Material
The source of recycling material will be from the
Southold area, restricted primarily to the north fork of Long
Island. Composition will be determined from quantities con-
tributed by homeowners, contractors and business construction
and demolition debris.
Only clean concrete and asphalt will be processed by the
Excel 2000 Series crusher. Materials will be stored in accor-
360 exemption issued
dated 12/10/90.
Odors and Vectors
by the
dance with the NYSDEC Part
Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
5.0 Mitiaation of Noise. Dust.
5.1 Noise
Noise mitigation is based on the discussion in Item
2.0 of this EAF Part 3. Mitigation is proposed by the
project sponsor in the form of a vegetated buffer
-6-
5.2
along all property lines. The
crusher is also situated to such
impacts
beyond
ranted.
concrete and asphalt
an extent to minimize
to sensitive receptors. Noise mitigation
what is proposed can be undertaken if war-
Increasing the vegetative buffer would atten-
uate noise as
Earthen berms,
can also be incorporated.
expensive mitigation measures
warranted at this time.
Dust
per the discussion in Section 2.0.
noise buffering around machinery, etc.
However, these are rather
and are not considered
Any time materials, such as concrete, asphalt, etc.,
are crushed, dust will be produced. According to
information supplied by the manufacturer, Excel Recy-
cling & Manufacturing Inc., the dust produced from the
machines is minimal. A mitigation measure to control
dust production from the crusher unit is a mist
sprayer. The spray bar is located in the intake and
discharge areas. To contain more dust, more water in
the mister is needed. A water wagon can be connected
to the crusher for remote operation or a connection
can be made directly to the water supply infrastruc-
ture of the facility. A water wagon is generally more
-7-
cost efficient. As a general rule, more dust tends to
be produced when pure substances are crushed, such as
pure concrete, with no other materials mixed in. Mist
level is constantly monitored so as not to produce a
discharge from the operation. Mist is accurately set
so that dust clings to the crushed material and is not
washed off. No runoff will be associated with the
crusher operation.
5.3 Odors
The proposed recycling facility is to accept only
material as described in Section 4.0. Material
sources will be limited, as provided in a covenant on
the deed. There are no known odors associated with
typical demolition debris operations similar to the
proposed action.
In the event an odor source can be attributed to the
recycling operation, commercially available fans and
filters can be incorporated into the units and build-
ings to mitigate odors. No odors are anticipated from
the proposed facility.
5.4 Vectors
Vectors, such as rats and mosquitoes, which are
known to carry and transmit pathogens, are not consid-
ered to be a significant environmental hazard of the
-8-
GROUP
proposed action. Construction/demolition recycling
facilities are not typically associated with such nui-
sances. Materials will be stored as per the NYSDEC
Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste
Engineer, dated 12/10/90. Puddling stormwater will be
drained if collecting on the stockpiled material. In
order to avoid providing den and nesting sites for
mammalian vectors dogs, cats, rats, etc., traps or
poisons can be utilized if it is shown that the facil-
ity is a vector source.
6.0 Vehicle TriPs
Vehicle trips were estimated by reviewing Town of
$outhold Landfill scale house records and estimating those
trips that would bypass the landfill for the new recycling
facility. Those estimated trips were combined with the aver-
age 5-10 trips per day existing within the excavation and
drainage business. Scale house data is provided in Appendix
D.
7.0 N SDEC A ova
Plans and application material before the NYSDEC regard-
ing the waste oil containment shed are pending. It is reason-
able to presume that final approval from the Planning Board
-9-
GROUP
will be conditional upon receipt of a permit from the NYSDEC,
with respect to the waste oil containment shed. Plans for the
shed will be provided to the Planning Board for review.
8.0 DisPosal of Waste Fluids
Disposal of collected waste fluids from the passenger
automobile recycling operation will be handled by a duly
licensed hauler. Copies of receipt between the applicant and
the handler are included in Appendix C.
9.0 Further Covenants
A covenant regarding access to the site by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives will be
provided. It is presumed that this covenant will be reflected
in the issuance of the salvage yard operating permit.
-10-
GF OUP
References
Louis K. McLean Associates, P.C.; H2M Group, 1988. Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for North Sea Landfill.
Unpublished.
Rau, John G. and David C. Wooten, 1980. Environmental Impact
Analysis Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA
Stanton, Donald J., 1987. Acoustic Noise Measurements and
Predicted Noise Levels for Model 1000, Eagle Crusher.
Unpublished.
Warren, Richard E., 1985. Noise Analysis of Sparrow Sand Mine
Site. Unpublished.
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
'IMPACTSTATEMENT
NORTH SEA
SANITARY LANDFILL
JUNE 1988
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, RC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
H2M GROUP
used as a source of daily cover material for the active cell (Cell
II). The Town has secured a triennial mining permit from the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Therefore, it
is not expected that any cultural impacts will be associated with
the proposed action.
3.2.6 Noise
This section on noise will discuss ambient noise levels at
and around the North Sea ~andfill, as well as provide the reader
with more common noise sources for comparative purposes. A
discussion on decibles is also provided, as well as existing'
regulations and standards concerning noise.
~mhient Noise Levels
Existing noise
form of vehicular traffic movements on area roadways
normal operation activities at the North Sea landfill.
in the vicinity of the project site is in the
and daily
Activities
at the landfill include vehicular movements (i.e. cars, trucks,
and bucket loaders) involved in depositing, moving and compacting
of solid waste and soil cover.
A~hient noise level data were obtained in and around the
project site at specific reference points which are illustrated in
Figure 3.2.6.1. A calibrated Davis Instruments Model 886 Sound
Level Meter Type 2 was utilized for the noise measurements. The
~hient noise levels were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C sound
levels. Sound level readings were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C
5O
Te.,e ~
SOURCE: N.Y.S.D.O.T. MAP 1981 SOUTHAMPTON QUAD. SCALE: 1'=2000
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON. NORTH SEA LANDFILL- FIGURE :5.?_.6.1
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL r-~&~,
REFERENCE POINTS ~-/V~l
LOUIS K. McI.EAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. IN ASSOCIATION WITH GROUP
scales for several reasons. First, most municipalities have sound
level regulations and standards in the dB-A scale, and second,
industrial heavy equipment is generally recorded in the dB-C
scale. The ambient noise level at the respective reference point
is provided in Table 3.4. Ail measurements were made
approximately three feet above ground level.
All sound level data at and around the North Sea Landfill
were recorded by H2M staff on December 28, 1987. Weather
conditions included an overcast day with temperatures at
approximately 40 degrees F. As stated previously, all a~hient.
noise levels at the reference points were recorded in both the dB-
A and dB-C scales. Actual data at each reference point for each
scale were taken once every five minutes over a 15-minute time
period. A sound level range was obtained, representing the
minimum to maximum levels indicated on the sound meter at each
reference point. The ranges indicated in Table 3.5 represent the
average of three readings (in their respective scale) taken at
each reference point.
The recorded data reveal the maximum readings on both the
dB-A and dB-C scales to be of the heavy equipment at close range
(i.e.,SS dB-A; 87 dB-C). Slightly lower readings were of passing
motor vehicles (i.e., 60 dB-A; S0 dB-C). The lowest readings
conditions (i.e. less than 40 dB-A; 45
represented quiet ambient
dB-C).
51
TABLE $. 4
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL AT THE REFERENCE POINTS
Reference Poin%
1. Southwest of the project
site in the woods at
approximately 1,000 ft.
Average Ambient Noise Level*
dB-C
46-53 58-63
Raw Data of Ambient Noise Levels
dB-A dB-C
48-55 59-63
46-53 60-65
43-50 55-62
Conditions
Heavy equipment (i.e.
bucket loaders) and their
back-up alert were heard
periodically, interspersed
with woodland quiet.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
East side adjacent to
Major's Path, several
hundre~ feet south of
the landfill's main
entrance.
46-62 59-77
48-75 55-80
45-60 58-65
45-50 65-85
Readings recorded passing
vehicles on Major's Path (no
heavy trucks).
In woods on west side
of Major's Path directly
opposite the landfill's
main entrance, at
approximately 1,000 ft.
Northwest corner of
proposed cell expansion
site.
49-57 62-74
40-48** 57-64**
49-55 60-67
48-57 60-80
50-58 65-75
Readings recorded vehicles
passing on Major's Path and
entering/existing landfill
as well as woodland quiet.
40-47 57-62 Readings recorded include
40-48 58-65 heavy equipment (i.e. bucket
40-50 57-65 loaders) at approximately
86 75 40 and 100 ft.
88 87
North Sea Road, approx.
800 ft. west of its
intersection w/Major's
Path.
40*** 50-53
40 50-53
40 50-53
40 50-53
No vehicular traffic; quiet
residential neighborhood.
Great Hill Road, approx. (40*** 45-48 (40 45-48
1400 ft. east of its <40 45-48
intersection w/Major's <40 45-48
Path.
No vehicular traffic; quiet
residential neighborhood.
Dirt road east of land- (40*** 45-47 <40 45-47
fill, at approximately <40 45-47
1,000 ft. south of Great <40 45-47
Hill Road.
Woodland.
* The ambient noise level at the reference point is provided for bo~h the d~-A an~ the dB-C sound level scales,
utilizing a calibrated Davis Instruments MOdel 886 sound level meter accurate to a decibel range 9f 40 to 140 dB. The
numbers indicate an average of the range (minimum to maximum) of recorded sound levels at the reference point. Actual
data at each reference point was taken once every five minutes over a 15-minute time period, for a total of three
readings in the specified time frame.
** Single noise level readings of heavy equipment at 40 ft. not included in the average.
*'' No range recorded - ambient readings did not fluctuate.
Source of North Sea sound level readings: H2M staff.
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 3.5
COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES AND L~v~LS
AT THE RI¥~'-KHEAD LANDFILL
SOUND SOURCE
Bucket Loader,
Riverhead Landfill
Bucket Loader Backup
Alert, Riverhead
Landfill
Gravel Truck
Gravel Truck
Passenger Auto
Passenger Auto
Interior During
Highway Travel
SOUND LE~
76 dB-A
82 dB-B
85 dB-C
9.0 dB-A
80 dB-C
86 dB-C
76 dB-C
72 dB-C
CONDITIONS
Measured at a distance
of 50 feet to one side
of the loader
Measured at 50 feet
50 feet to the side of
Osborn Avenue
Measured at road shoulder
Measured at road shoulder
As reported for typical
new autos during road
tests
Source of Riverhead Readings: Mr. Donald J. Stanton, P.E.
I
I
For comparative purposes, additional acoustic measurements
were made at and around the project site, as well as at the River-
head landfill, so as to provide some familiar sound references.
iThese measurements include vehicles passing a roadside vantage
point, a bucket loader at 50 feet and the backup alert from a
Ibucket loader. These data are provided in Table 3.5
I
I
The approximate sound levels of other, more familiar sources
in the A-weighted scale f~om various locations near the different
noise sources are provided below:
Typical Source
Noise Level
dB-A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Vacuum Cleaner (3 ft away) 73
Clothes Drier (3 ft away) 63
Blender (3 ft away) 75
Air Conditioner (3 ft away) 58
Jackha~er (50 ft away) 88
Lawn Mower (50 ft. away) 72
Chain Saw (50 ft. away) 83
Snow Blower (50 ft away) 85
Based upon information provided in the Environmental Impact
Analysis Handbook by John Rau and David Wooten, when a steady
outdoor noise level of 70 dB-A exists, relaxed conversational
speech is virtually impossible. Even with a raised voice, satis-
factory conversation is not possible for distances greater than
about 5 feet.
52
I Decibels
For reference purposes, a discussion of decibels, dB, and the
measurements of same will be detailed herein.
The physical description of sound concerns its loudness as a
ifunction of frequency. Typically, noise is composed of many fre-
quency components of various loudness distributed over the audible
I frequency range. Various noise scales have been established to
i describe quantitatively the response of the average person to a
complex sound composed of various frequencies at different
Iloudness levels. Therefore, simplified techniques have been
developed to account for the dependence of perceived loudness upon
I frequency. This is done by the use of weighting filters in noise
i measuring instruments which give a direct reading of approximate
loudness.
I
I
I
The sound level of an object can be reported in decibels
(dB), on three different weighted scales: dB-A, dB-B, and dB-C.
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard reference level of 0.002 microbar. A sound meter, such
as the one used to record the measurements for this report, is
equipped with the most common frequency weighting networks (scales
A, B and C) which alter the frequency response of the sound meter.
This alteration occurs in much the same manner as a stereo system
equalizer alters the frequency response of the stereo sound
system. However, in the case of the sound meter, the frequency
53
I
i response is present. The relative frequency response of each
weighted scale is illustrated in Figure 3.2.6.2. The dB-A scale
Iis 27 dB lower in relative frequency response than the dB-C scale.
For example, at 30 Hz the dB-C is 27 dB more sensitive than the
I dB-A scale, and 10 dB more sensitive than the dB-B scale. The
essential difference between the weighted scales is that the
I higher the letter scale ( i. e. dB-C) , the greater the low
th. r.spons, h=an'?r to h:ar loud no s.. Th. r.lat v.ly
I low frequency ~hllng machinery no~se, such as that produced by
heavy machinery at the landfill, is an example of loud noise. In'
I effect, the .dB-c scale "hears better" than the dB-A or dB-B scales
'1 for loud noises. Thus, the dB-C scale was the predominant scale
u.sed in collecting noise data. The dB-C scale also provides the
highest readings of the ~e.e we. igbt.ed noise level in order to
~1 rate a sound's loudness, this aids in determining the impact a
noise may have on humans..
I The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio of
sou_nd intensity, measured relative to the reference level (0.0002
I microbars). This relationship can be described mathematically as
I
I
I
follows:
dB =
10 lOgl0 (Measured Level)
( 0.0002 )
No formula exists to provide a direct conversion from one
scale to another.
54
FREQUENCY HZ
SOURCE: MR. DONALD d.
STANTON~ P.E.
TOWNOF SOUTHAMPTONNORTH SEA LANDFILL' FIGURE NO. :5.2.
NOISE METER RESPONSE
Noise Requlations and Standards
Noise control regulations exist at the federal, state, county
and local levels. The Noise Control Act of 1972 gives the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency the authority to set standards for
the noise levels produced by major noise sources.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) general
industry standards are established only for the operator of a
piece of equipment, not the general public. A piece of equipment
may be within OSHA operator limits, but still be considered noisy.
by persons at a distance from the Source.
Pursuant to Title 29, Section 1910.95 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (29 CFR 1910.95), protection against the effects of
the noise exl~osure must be provided to equipment operators (and
others, as applicable) when sound levels exceed those illustrated
below when measured on the A-weighted decibel scale:
Duration Per Day
(hours)
Sound Level
dB-A
8 90
6 92
4 95
3 97
2 100
1-1/2 102
1 105
1/2 110
< 1/4 115
-
55
If the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more
I periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined
effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of
Ieach. When employees are subjected to sound exceeding the limits
above, personal protective equipment should be provided to reduce
I sound levels.
I The states have the authority to control noise by licensing,
· regulating or restricting the use, operation and movement of noise
I sources and by setting maximum noise levels permitted in the
environment.
I
I
!
I
I
!
In New York State, Part 450, Noise from Heavy Motor Vehicles,
of Title 6, New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR Part
450) provides maximum permissible motor vehicle sound levels in
dB-A. Part 450 is applicable at any time or under any condition
of highway grade, load acceleration or deceleration. However, it
is not applicable to:
O
O
a vehicle with a maximum gross weight of ~ 10,000 pounds
a combination of vehicles having a maximum gross weight
of ~ 10,000 pounds
warning devices (i.e., horns, sirens) and associated
vehicles.
56
A s,~mary of the maximum permissible sound level readings (in
dB-A)
follows:
Distance Between Measuring
Point to Target Vehicle
(in Feet)
Range of Maximum
Sound Level
(dB-A)
35-38 89-95
39-42 88-94
43-47 87-93
48-57 86-92
58-69 85-91
70-82 84-90
Regulations regarding maximum permissible noise levels from.
automobile and other sources not covered by Part 450 are at the
local level.
Noise standards at the local level in the Town of Southampton
are found in Chapter 47, Noise, of the Town Code. Noise standards'
are provided for use in
industrial zoning districts.
the Open Space Conservation
residential and also commercial or
No noise standards are provided for
(0SC) zoning district in which the 6-
acre project site is located. Therefore, the data can only be
compared to the sound levels established for residential and
commercial or industrial districts. For residential districts,
all readings in dB-A, except for passing motor vehicles and inter-
mittent heavy equipment activity, are wit. him Town standards. For
industrial or commercial districts, all readings dB-A, except for
passing motor vehicles and intermittent heavy equipment activity
57
are within Town standards. It should be noted that the majority
of the North Sea landfill property is within the OSC zoning
'
district pursuant to the official zoning map for the Town (4th
Update: May 1986).
Noise standards for the Town are provided herein. In a resi-
dential district, no person shall create or cause to be emitted
any noise which, when measured at any lot line in a residential
district, exceeds the following standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
!
!
a) airborne sound in excess of 65 dB-A; or
b)
airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
lasted below in one (1) or more ocatve bands:
Octave 'Band
Center Frequency Octave Band
(Hertz, Hz) in Sound Pressure
cycles per sec. Level (dB)
31.5 78
63 73
125 67
250 60
500 55
1000 51
2000 46
4000 43
8000 40
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
a) airborne sound which has a sound level in
excess of fifty (50) dB-a; or
58
b)
airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
listed below in one (1) or more octave bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB}
31.5 75
63 70
125 64
250 57
500 52
1000 49
2000 43
4000 40
8000 37
i
I
In a commercial or industrial district, noise standards are
such that no person shall create or cause to be emitted any noise
which, when measured at any lot line in a commercial or industrial
i district, exceeds the following standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.:
I a) airborne noise in excess of seventy
(70) dB-A; or
I
I
b)
airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
I
I
I
31.5
63
125
25O
5O0
1000
2000
4000
8000
85
80
74
67
62
58
53
5O
47
59
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.:
a)
airborne sound which has a sound level in excess
of fifty-five (55) dB-A; or
b)
airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more octave
Octave Band
Center Frequency Octave Band
(Hertz, HZ) in Sound Pressure
cycles per ~ec. Level (dB)
31.5 78
63 73
125 67
250 60
500 55
1000 51
2000 46
4000 43
8000 40
The provisions listed above apply to the use of occupancy of
any lot or'structure thereon and to noise produced thereby except
the following:
The intermittent or occasional use between 7:00 a.m.
through 7:00 p.m. of homeowner's light residential out-
door equipment or commercial service equipment, provided
that said equipment and its use comply with the other
provisions of Chapter 47.
Construction activities between 7:00 a.m. through 7:00
p.m. and the associated use of construction devices or
to the noise produced thereby, provided that such
activities and such equipment and their use comply with
the other provisions of Chapter 47.
o Agriculture
6O
o Noise from church bells or chimes used in conjunction
with religious services.
O
O
O
Public celebrations.
Noise of aircraft flight operations.
The lawful operation of properly equipped motor vehicles
on any public way.
This local law does not apply to emergency stationary and
tion for 15 minutes or less. Penalties
law are a fine of not more than $250.,
more than 15 days, or both.
mobile signal devices or audible exterior burglar alarms in opera-
for offenses of the local
or by imprisonment Of.not
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT
ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENTS
AND
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
FOR
MODEL 1000, EAGLE CRUSHER
JULY 1987
PREPARED BY:
DONALD J. STANTON PE
7 WHITNEY COURT
SMITHTOWN~ NY 11787
PREPARED FOR:
H2M GROUP
575 BROADHOLLOW ROAD
MELVILLE, NY 11747-5076
JUL 2 4 I§87
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1
DISCUSSION ............................................. 2
CONCLUSIONS ............................................ ~
APPENDIX A--ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT
APPENDIX B--EAGLE CRUSHER MODEL JUMBO 1000
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
FIGURE 1 ............................... CRUSHER MEASUREMENT SITE
FIGURE 2 ................................... PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 5 ................. MEASURED AND EXTRAPOLATED NOISE LEVELS
FIGURE 4 ........................................... LAND USE MAP
LIST DF TABLES
TABLE 1 .......................... CRUSHER OPERATING NOISE LEVELS
TABLE 2 ............ AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS, RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
TABLE 5 .................. COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES & LEVELS
TABLE 4 .................. PROJECTED REFERENCE POINT NOISE LEVELS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
This report contains acoustic noise measurements made on a
concrete crusher, Model Jumbo 1400, manufactured by Eagle Crusher
Corporation. The objective of the measurement effort was
two~old:
1. To obtain an estimate of noise that might be produced in the
vicinity of the designated project site by a Model 1000
crusher
2. To determine any preferences regarding orientation of a
crusher at the project site.
Both objectives were accomplished.
Extrapolation of noise data obtained on a similar Eagle
Crusher indicates that noise levels in the vicinity of the
project site will be well within current noise levels (ie before
crusher installation). Regarding orientation of the Crusher at
the project site, it appears not to be an overriding factor and
that other operating considerations can be given preference
instead.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISCUSSION
Noise measurements were made on an operating Eagle Corp.
Model Jumbo 1400 Crusher, with muffler, during concrete crushing
operations. The Crusher is owned by Davies Bros. Corp~ Howell~
NJ~ and is currently being operated at Barrett Corp. facilities
in Trenton, NJ. Measurements were made at distances of 10 and 50
feet from the skin of the Crusher in three quadrants. The fourth
quadrant was inaccessible because of the presence of conveyors
and mounds of crushed product.
Additional measurements were made, as the site permitted, at
the operator station and at 100 feet and 250 feet distances away
from the operator station. The operator station has a reference
point of 0 feet~ for purposes of this discussion. The 250 ~oet
measurement was made with a direct, clear path to the Crusher and
with a 20 foot sand berm between the observation point and the
Crusher. Measurement site geometry is shown in Figure 1.
While most measurements were made on dB ~cales Ay B and C,
the intensity of the noise generated by the Crusher makes scale C
the most appropriate and realistic (see Appendix A). Scales A
and B diminish the effects of iow frequencies (rumble type of
noise that is a significant factor during Crusher operation).
The frequency response of the sound meter for dB scales Ar B and
C is provided in Appendix A. It is apparent from these scales
that the C scale is the most responsive to low frequency noise.
For example~ at 50 hz the C scale is 27 dB more sensitive than
the A scale and 10 dB more sensitive than the B scale.
2
'.PI 6. ~ E L
I~0 SC,~L E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ail measurements were made approximately 5 feet above ground
level. The New Jersey site is {lat except ~er piles e¥ sand~
cencrete rubble, and crushed product. Fencing around the site
c~nstrained distance measurements. Crusher noise measurement
data obtained at the New Jersey site are previded in Table 1.
Other ~actors neted during the measurements at the New
Jersey site were the high noise levels at the operater station,
greund tremors noticable at 100 Yeet and dust produced during
Crusher operation. (It should be noted that an included
sprinkler system was not ~unctioning at the time o{ measurement.
The sprinkler weuld most likely eliminate the dust product.)
Backgreund ambient noise measurements were made at the
proposed Riverhead Crusher site and at preselected re~eren~e
points outside the Riverhead site. Riverhead re~erence point
geometry is shown in Figure 2. Ambient noise levels measured are
provided in Table 2.
Additional acoustic noise measurements wePe made to provide
some {amiiiar sound re{erences. These measurements included
passing autemobies and trucks from a roadside vantage point, a
bucket loader at 50 ~eet and the backup alert ~rom a bucket
loader. Data are provided in Table 5.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISTANCE
TABLE 1
ZCRUSHER. OPERATING NOISE LEVELS, TRENTON. NJ
(FT> SIDE** NOISE. LEVEL
AVERAGE
(DB/SCALE>
RANGE
0 (OPERATOR PLATPORM) 4
10 I
1 ¢~ 2
10 5
10
50
5¢)
50
50
100
250 (NO BERM>
~.~(lJFT HIGH SAND BERM)
~5/C
~5/C
~7/C
94/C
85/C
~O/C
90/0
85/0
72/C
58/C
95-102/C
84-89/A
88-92/B
88-100/C
95-99/A
96-100/B
95-99/C
88-94/A
92-96/B
92-99/C
NO DATA
83-93/C
88-95/C
88-95/C
NO DATA
81-85/C
65-74/A
65-75/B
70-75/C
55-61/C
t~f'IUDEL I,"I-O0 EAGLE CRU,:~HER
UF'F.iRAT I OhlS.
*SEE FIGURE i
DURING ROADWAY CONCRETE
5
CRUSH I I',IG
FIGURE
=--=-- ./X 'X, J ~, ..... ' ::.'" SUBJECT PARCEL
../ ~ / 'X ~ . / ..-~ x . ~-~ ~X X
~ ,' ~/ ~ ~ .~--53, ~:~'-- :-+ ~,~ x
' -' ~ ' ~ _:_ .~ :::~ -'"x X ~ /fX ,( ~ 2'"~-.-=~ ·
' ' .- , ", ~ ..- ' ',, ..-' ':.
, , , · , ~ ~. . .:~ . , X · .
', · ~-.-_%:-':~ ~ X .. 5-,-.: X '-..'.:": ....
~ I ~~ '"'"""
~'~'-~ .... LO~ATION MAP HOLZ~CHER~ ~cLENDON
~ABLE2
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS~ RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
REFERENCE .POINTZ
NOISE LEVEL (DB/SCALE)
(RIVERHEAD LANDFILL GENERATOR AT 60 FT)
1
65/A
72/B
76/C
(BUCKET LOADER AT TOWN LANDFILL)
2
76/A
82/B
85/C
(DOG GATE~ YOUNGS AVE.)
65/A
70/B
76/C
(ATOF' BERM, NO SITE
4
ACTIVITY)
62/A
67/B
72/C
5
62/A
67/B
72/C
(NO TRAFFIC ON OSBORN
6,7
AVE.)
40/A
45/B
50/C
~SEE FIGU~E 2 LOCATION MAP, FOR REFERENCE POINT LOCATIONS
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 5
COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES &.LEVELS
SOUND. SOURCE
SOUND LEVEL
(DB/SCALE)
CONDITIONS
BUCKET LOADER
76/A
82/B
85/C
MEASURED AT A DISTANCE
OF 50 FT TO ONE SIDE OF
THE LOADER.
BUCKER LOADER BACKUP ALERT c~O/A
MEASURED AT 50 FT
GRAVEL TRUCK 80/C
50 FT TO THE SIDE OF
OSBORN AVE.
GRAVEL TRUCK
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
PASSENGER AUTO
76/C
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
PASSENGER AUTO
INTERIOR DURING HWY TRAVEL
72/C
AS REPORTED FOR TYPICAL
NEW AUTOS DURING ROAD
TESTS
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONCLUSIONS
Sufficient data were obtained
1. Probable noise levels that wiii
Crusher at reference locations
be produced by the proposed
for the Rivmrhead site.
2. The noise reduction effect of the berms at the Riverhead
site.
The preferred orientation of a crusher at the
Riverhead site.
A plot of the data taken along reference lines A and B, as
indicated in Figure 1, is illustrated in Figure 5. These data
are used to estimate the noise levels that can be expected at
reference points 1 through 7 (shown on Figure 2 Location Map).
Extrapolation along reference line A provides an estimate of
noise levels in the absence of a berm. Differential measurements
made along reference lines A and B at a distance of 250 feet are
used to estimate the noise shielding effect of the berm. Note
the sand berm located between the noise measurement site and the
Crusher aieng reference line B in Figure 1. The measured
shielding effect of the berm was 14 db, however the actual
shielding effect o~ the berm is believed te be greater than this
amount, but residual background noise behind the berm prevented
accurate measurement of the shielding effect beyond 14 db.
9
I
I 1lo
I
I I oO ,
~ "
j ~o--
I ~ol5£
'70 '
I
zi.O
r- XTra, ~oL.~TIoIO
Based on these results Table 4 provides an estimate of
expected average noise levels at the Riverhead site. Included
with these estimates are the noise levels measured at the
Riverhead site with no machinery operating at the Suffolk Cement
Recycling facility. A positive differential between the current
measurements in the vicinity of the Riverhead project site and
the projected noise levels with the Crusher operating are an
indication that noise from the Crusher may be perceptible.
However note that all differentials are negative except at
reference point 6. Therefore, even if perceptible, the levels at
reference point 6 are significantly less than normal street
noise, such as passing traffic. A differentia], of 0 dB indicated
that the estimated noise from the Crusher will be equal to the
present background noise. A negative differential indicates that
noise from the Crusher will be less than the present background
noise at the measurement point.
Reference to the measurements made at the Trenton~ NJ site
in three quadrants shows a maximum difference of +7 dB in
sustained noise measuredopposite the engine ventilator of the
Crusher. Opposite ends of the Crusher each produced
approximately the same sustained noise levels, with the end
containing the hopper producing higher peak rumble noises due to
concrete material shifting and making contact with the hopper
sidewalls during the crushing operations.
11
TABLE
PROJECTED REFERENCE POINT'NOISE LEVELS
APPROXIMATE
DISTANCE (FT)
REFERENCE PROM PROPOSED AVERAGE NOISE DIFFERENTIALZ
POINT CRUSHER LOCATION LEVEL (DB)
PROJECTEDZ~ PRESENT~Z~
450 55 DB/C 76 DB/C -25
LANDFILL GENERATOR
750 48 DB/C 85 DB/C -57
BUCKET LOADER
450 55 DB/C 76 DB/C -25
500 57 DB/C 72 DB/C -15
550 51DB/C 72 DB/C -21
600 50 DB/C 50 DB/C 0
750 48 DB/C 50 DB/C -2
AVG. PROJECTED CRUSHER NOISE MINUS PRESENT AMBIENT/BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS
CRUSHER NOISE ONLY.
*~* RECORDED NOISE LEVELS.
12
The land use map (Figure 4> shows residential land usage
both north and south of the Riverhead project site~ along Osborn
Avenue. Riverhead Town !andfiit the site of a generator, and
where trash dumping and earthmoving operations are ongoing,
occupies the parcel west of the project site. This suggests that
from a noise standpoint, the Crusher, if installed at the project
site, be oriented with the long dimension approximately N-S with
the engine vent facing West. As the differential noise levels
from the Crusher are not significantly different, and given the
presence of at least 55 foot high earth berms and a somewhat
baffled entry to the base of the sand pit at the project site
where the Crusher is to Oe located~ orientation is not
sufficiently critical to override other site operation
considerations. These considerations include location of
unprocessed concrete rubble, location of processed product,
maneuver space for loading the hopper~ space for any conveyor
system that will be needed and, final!y~ access to and ~rom the
site.
Summarizing, measured and extrapolated data indicate that a
Jumbo 1000 Crusher installed at the Riverhead project site will
contribute less noise than current ambient noise ievels~ as
measured at selected reference locations. These results indicate
that it is unlikely that noise generated by the Crusher will be
perceptible outsi~e the grounds of Suffolk Cement project site.
Regarding orientation of the Crusher in the excavated site
at the project site, while a North-South orientation of the long
axis of t~e Crusher may be preferable, the data indicate that i~
is not necessary.
LAND USE
PAR~
FIGURE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard re~erence level o~ 0.0002 microbar. The instruments
used are equipped with weighting networks, corresponding to
scales A~ B~ and C~ that alter the ~requency response o{ the
sound meter in much the same manner as a stereo system equalizer
alters the ~requency response o~ the stereo sound system. In the
case o{ the sound meter however the frequency response is preset.
The relative response en each scale is shown in Figure A-t. The
essential di{ference is that the higher the letter scale the
greater the low frequency response. In addition~ the response
scale C corresponds to the response of the human ear to loud
noise~ thus it was the predominant scale used in collecting
Crusher noise data. Scale C also provides the highest readings
o~ 'the three scales~ allowing for a margin o~ error.
Both B & K and General Radio measurement equipment was
available for use. It proved most appropriate to use a
calibrated General Radio model 1555-A Sound Survey Meter for
these measurements because of its portability.
The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio
sound intensity measured~ relative to the re{erence level
microbar). The form of the relationship is
Measured Level
dB = 10 loglo Reference Level
m .m m m
,
m m m m
m m m -~m .m
I
=I The
' JCrushing & Screening Plant
~i ~ifferent Produ~ts...Afl at On~e!
FIELD PROVEN... ON THE JOB!
· 4 Different Products--3 in closed-circuit and a 4th in open-circuit.
· Field Proven--200-250 TPH (high-silica limestone, gravel, traprock, as well as recycled
asphalt & concrete).
· Exclusive "Counter-ShaW' Arrangement--maximizes efficien~ of diesel engine...
RPM's remain constant, as speed of crusher is adjusted to job.
· No Field Assembly--simply block & crush,
FEATURES
· Crusher--33,000 lb., 3-stage, hi-chrome or alloy steel, fixed blow bar impact crasher.
· Feed Hopper--w/16 ft. vibrating grizzly feeder.
· Screenm5 ft. x 16 ft. double-deck, vibrating screen,
· Closed-Circuit Operation-- return conveyor, standard,
· Side Delivery Conveyors--all fold easily for travel.
For further information or to see our plants in furl
operation in the field, on video tape... Write or Call'.
(800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE [Ohio]
TELEX: 987433
Field Report: #12
I II II
JUMBO 1000
THREE-IN-ONE PLANT
Now... in Delphi, Indiana
.. TYPICAL FEED SIZE:
14" CHUNKS OF HARD
DOLOMITE LIMESTONE
(THIS MACHINE HAS EASILY
· HANDLED UP TO 32" SLABS
WITH NO DIFFICULTY.)
DISCHARGE: HIGHLY
UNIFORM MINUS 1¥2"
PRODUCT PRODUCED
AT 200 TPH.
4250 S.R. 309 · GALLON, OHIO 44833
"New Ideas . From a Century of Experience"
INC.
I
Field Report: DELPHI, INDIANA
JUMBO 1000... T/'/RE£-IN-ON£ PLANT
$1'11"
Job Specifications
Material: Limestone
Material Characteristics: Medium Hard & Abrasive
Feed Size: 24" x 0"
Discharge Product: Minus 1~/2"-I' Minus 7/8" x 0"
Capacity: 200 TPH
Plant Specifications
. Travel Height: 13' 6"
~perating Height: 13' 6"
Weight: 87,500 lbs.
Power Supply: Diesel (325 hp.)
Hopper Opening Size: 16'
Vibrating Feeder Size: 40" x 15'
Crusher Size: RC 10 (44" x 42")
Crusher Feed Opening: 42" x 31"
Discharge System: 42" to
DD Screen
Generator: 100 Kw
Tires: 12-10:00 x 20
Screen Size: 5' x 16'
Special Features
· Products-- Makes 3 different products.., simultaneously.., in closed circuit with absolute sizing,
and a 4th product in open-circuit.
· No Field Assembly Required ~ Simply block and crush.
· Side Conveyors--Fold for travel.
For a copy of Our color Recycling Brochure... and to see
our plants in full operation in the field, on video tape:
Call Toll Free."(800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE (Ohio
4250 S.R. 309 · GALLON, OHIO 44833
"New Ideas. From a Century of Experience"
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE SITE
situate
South Street, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
Prepared ~or:
Mr2 Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
Prepared By:
Richard E. Warren, Director
Thomas A. Panasci, Assistant Planner
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
Planning & Development Consultants
Butter Lane Corner, P.O. Box 897
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
Date Prepared:
May 1, 1985
INTEr CIENCE
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE
situate
South Road, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
Prepared For:
Mr. Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
Prepared By:
Richard E. Warren, Director
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
The following presents noise data recorded on 16 April, 29
April and 30 April 1985 by Inter-Science Research Associates,
Inc. from the Sparrow Sand Mine property located along the
southerly side of South Road, Manorville, and within the
surrounding neighborhoods.
SUMMARY:
During April 1985, the staff of Inter-Science Research
Associates, Inc. recorded noise levels throughout the Sparrow
Sand Mine property and in the adjacent surrounding neighborhoods,
in an effort to ascertain whether the existing sand m~ning
operation exceeds the limits established in'Chapter 50 of the
Code of the Town of Brookhaven, entitled "Noise Control".
Measurements were taken at a variety of locations, in order to
determine the impacts of the operation of the sand mine on the
surrounding properties. Locations sampled included:
o Intersection of South Road and Wading River Road;
One-half way between intersection of South Road
and Wading River Road, and Sparrow Sand Mine site;
Wading River Road and the entrance to the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
Along top edge of mining pit, within the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
At bottom of sand mining pit, approximately 100'
from sand screening operation;
O At bottom of pit, approximately 15' from front-end
loader dropping large rocks into dUmp truck;
At bottom of pit, approximately 20' from front-end
loader dropping sand into dump truck;
0.2 miles west of entrance of Sparrow Sand Mine,
along South Road;
o Intersection of Dayton Avenue and South Road;
Within Pine Hills Country Club, northern section,
nearest Sparrow Sand Mine property.
Noise measurements were taken on April 16, 1985 between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., utilizing a Metrosonics db 307
Noise Dosimeter with a wind screen. All measurements were
recorded as A-weighted sound pressure levels for the various
locations from various sources. Similar readings were also
recorded on 29-30 April 1985, to obtain ambient noise levels for
the property when no machinery was operating, and for noise level
readings for the periphery of the site.
The acoustical computations performed by the Metrosonics db
307 measures the A-weighted sound level with Slow response.
The detector output is sampled at a rate of 8 samples per second.
Data recorded in the field included Average Sound Level (Lavg)
and Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) over varying time periods.
The Noise Control ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven
requires that the noise limits for industrial uses be below the
following levels:
Maximum Permissible
Level, in dBA
Residential Property:
7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
65 dBA
50 dBA
Commercial Property (all times): 65 dBA
Industrial Property (all times): 75 dBA
Readings were taken approximately 150' from noise sources on
the site (when possible), and also along the property lines to
determine the noise levels crossing onto adjacent property. In
addition, standard noise readings were also recorded along rural
roadways within Bridgehampton, New York to assess the noise
levels of passing passenger vehicles and other types of trucks.
This data is also presented below.
FINDINGS:
(NOTE: Noise level readings were taken from a number of
locations within and around the periphery of the sand mine
site. Readings were taken over 10 minute intervals, using
A-weighted measuring. The results are as follows:
1. Ambient Levels: The ambient levels recorded on the
property were taken at 5:00 p.m. on 29 April 1985. Readings were
taken in the northern central portion of the property and at the
bottom of the sand mining pit. At both locations, readings were
recorded at 45.0 dBA with no mining, sorting or loading activity.
2. Noise Levels Around Periphery of Site During Operation:
The field data recorded for the noise analysis indicated that in
all cases, the sound pressure levels recorded around the
periphery of the property did not exceed the requirements of the
Noise Control Ordinance. A-weighted averages found the following
sound levels recorded for the various locations around the
periphery of the property:
NOISE LEVELS RECORDED 16 APRILr 30 APRIL 1985:
Intersection South Road & Wading River Rd: 49.3 dBA
Entrance to the Sparrow Sand Mine: 45.0 dBA
Property border with Pine Hills Country·
Club (east) adjacent to sand mine area: 45.'0 dBA
Westerly Property Boundary Line:
45.0 dBA
In all cases, the noise levels recorded along the periphery .
of the property were within the permitted limits as per the Noise
Control Ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven.
3. Noise Levels On-Site (within Mine) During Operation:
Readings were also taken within the sand mining pit and along the
access roadway leading to the bottom of the mine, to determine
the overall noise levels occurring on-site. Readings were taken
within 150 - 200 feet of noise sources, where possible. Findings
are as follows:
NOISE LEVELS ON-SITE DURING OPERATION 16 APRIL 1-985
AND 30 APRIL 1985:
Lip of Sand Mine, Inside Property: 45.8 dBA
Bottom of Sand Pit, Front End Loader
loading sand into waiting dump truck: 50.4 dBA
Truck loaded with sand leaving pit up
access roadway within pit: 79.5 dBA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sand Grading Operation (150' from
sand and gravel sorter):
Sand Truck waiting (Dieseling):
52.0
45.0 dBA
- 54.0 dBA
During instantaneous periods in the bottom of the sand
mining pit (approximately 60' below the surrounding property
grade), noise levels did exceed the maximum levels of 75 dBA:
(1) during periods of loading rocks into empty dump truck, and
(2) 40 ton dump truck accelerating up the hill that leads from
the bottom of the sand mine to the top. Levels recorded include:
Bottom of Pit, tractor loading rocks
into waiting truck:
79.2 dBA*
Bottom of Pit, sand and gravel sorter
(meas6red 50' away):
84.9 dBA
*measured while dropping rocks into empty truck.
The lip of the mine acts as an "amphitheater", and directs
the noise levels upward, rather than towards the adjacent
properties surrounding the mine. Therefore, the noise levels
recorded along the perimeter of the site all were less than that
found within the mine pit itself. Again, all recordings taken
measuring the sound levels crossing the property boundaries met
the Town's maximum permissible levels for noise generation.
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCHASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: April 16, 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise
Source: Traffic
Description:
River Road
Intersection of South Street & Wadinq
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
~otal Time during Test Run:
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOT~S: 4 dump trucks passed intersection
28 cars passed by ~tersection
75 ft.
9:05 a.m. Time Completed: 10:05 a.m.
1.0 m~s/hours
49.3 dBA
83.4 dBA
Data Recorded By: ~
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD S H EE~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUT~ STREETt MANORVILLEt TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 1st Residence on Dayton Avenu9
Description: (West of Sand Mine)
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
~otal Time during Test Run:
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
N/A ft.
10:15 a.m.Time Completed: 10:25 a.m.
10 minutes/~
NOTES:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 83.0 dBA
5 cars passed by site causin~ elevated peaks levels
Data Recorded
Sheet of
Date: 16 April 1985
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE ANALYSIS FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Vehicles traveling along South Street
Description: (entrance to sand mine)
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
'~otal Time during Test Run:
25-30 ft.
10:30 a-mTime Completed: 10:40 a.m.
10 minu res/~%
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:'
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 82.9 dBA
NOTES: Mich nQ~e levles when cars passed site. No trucks passed
property durin~ period of testing.
Data Recorded By:
Sheet of
Date: 16 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROO](/~AVEN
Noise Source: Front end loader
Description: Loading sand into waiting truck
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
'~otal Time during Test Run:
~O ft.
11:00 amTime Completed: 11:05 a.m.
5 minutes/gno~r~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 50.4
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 84.3
dBA
dBA
NOTES: One truck passed by.
Data Recorded By: ~ ~ ~,~'
Sheet of
Date: 16 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Locat ion: SOUTH STREET r MANORVILLE t TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Bottom of mine pit - machinery
· ' Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
Total Time during Test Run:
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
NOTES:
83 ft.
11:10 am Time Completed: 11:20 am
10 minutes / ~u~x~
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
2 trucks drove out of pit.
sorters.
47.1 dBA
83.1 dBA
Recordinqs taken near two sand
I
I
I
Da ta
Recorded By: ~ ~
Sheet
of
Date: 16 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Front end loader loadin~ large rocks onto waiting truck
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
'~otal Time during Test Run:
15 ft.
11:25am Time Completed: 11:30 am
5 minu res
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
79.2 dBA
98 dBA
NOTES: One truck passed by.
Data
Recorded By: ~
Sheet
of
Date: 16 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOK~AV~N
Noise Source: Bottom of sand mine pit~ measurinq sand and gravel sorter
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: 25 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:35am Time Completed: 11:45 am
~otal Time during Test Run: 10- minutes/aho~x~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:'
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 84.9 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 87.0 dBA
NOTES :. on, tru~ and one tractor ua~9~ bY.
I
I
I
Data Re~orded By:
Sheet of
Date: 16 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING ~OMPANY
Location: SOUTH ST~E~T~ MANORVILL~r TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: LiD Of mine Chlahe~t elevation) Dointinu towards mine
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: 800
Time Recordings Initiated: ll:50am
~otal Time during Test Run: 10
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
NOTES:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
One truck and one car passed by.
ft.
Time Completed: 12:00 pm
minutes/~
45.8 dBA
83.0 dBA
Data Recorded By:
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
NOISE ANALYSIS FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPABROW MINING COMPANy
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Along property line adjoining Pine Hills Country Club
Description: ~ointing towards mine pit.
Distance to Noise Source: 800+
Time Recordings Initiated: 12:20 pm
~otal Time during Test Run: 10
ft. (approx)
Time Completed:
minutes~x~
12: 30 ~.m.
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average No%se Level (Lavg): 45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 76.6 dBA
NOTES:
from man hammering behind equipment.
Data .Recorded By:
Sheet of
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, Ngw York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Project: SPARROW M~NING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BBOOK~A~EN
Noise Source: 1 large truck accelleratin~ up hill out of sand ~it.
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: 6-8
Time Recordings Initiated: N/A
~otal Time during Test Run: N/~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
ft~
Time Completed:
minutes/hours
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 79.5 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): - dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By:
Date:
Sheet of
~6 April 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 29 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAV~N
Noise Source: 40 yard (?) dump truck (idling) waiting
Description:
'Distance to Noise Source: 75 ft. (approx.)
Time Recordings Initiated: 4:45 p.m. Time Completed: 4:50 p.m.
~otal Time during Test Run: 5 minutes/T~5~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 52-54 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 75.8 dBA
NOTES:
I
I
I
Data Recorded By: ~-~- ~
Sheet of
Date: 29 April. 1985
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 29 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE. TOWN OF
Noise Source: Ambient noise level
Description: No oDeration of e~ruiDment within sand
~ine.
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
~otal Time during Test Run:
N/A ft.
5:00 p.m.Time Completed:._5.ulS_~Lm~_
15 minutes/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise. Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
45.0 dBA
45.0 dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By:
Date:3.9 Aor~l 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE ANALYSIS FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Sand sorter & loading
Description: measured fr~n lip of mine
Distance to Noise Source: 200
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:30 am
~otal Time during Test Run: 10
ft. (approx)
Time Completed: 9:40 am
minutes / h~=~-~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg): 45.0
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 74.7
dBA
dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By:
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
N O I S E A N ALY S I S - F I E L D S H E E T.S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MIN]/~G CO~/~ANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORV??.I.~, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Property boundary line - Dointinq towards sand Dit adjacent to
Pine Hills.
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: 250
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:45 am
'~ot'al Time during Test Run: 10
ft.
Time Completed: 9:55 am
minutes/~%'4~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):. 65.2 dBA
NOTES: Approximately 50' away from 9:30 a.m. reading.
Data Recorded By: ~ ~. ~".''
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 A~ril 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREETf MANORVILLEf TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: ~and cradiRq QDerat~QB
'Description: taken from lip of mine pointing towards
pit.
Distance to Noise Source:
Time Recordings Initiated:
~otal Time during Test Run:
15~ ft.
10:15 am Time Completed:
10 minu res/~
10:25 am
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
45.0 dBA
74.1 dBA
NOTES:
I
I
I
Data Recorded By:
Sheet of
Date: 30 April 1985
!
!
N O I S E A N A.LY S I S - F I E L D S H E E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATESr INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Entrance to sand mine, South Street
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: N/A ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:40 am Time Completed:
~otal Time during Test Run: 15 minutes/~
10:50 am
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): 45.0 dBA
'Peak Noise Level (Lmax): 55.0 dBA
NOTES: Elevated level ~rom ~nd truck nassin~ bv monitor.
Data Recorded By: ~ ~ ~c,~.~.4~'
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
NOISE ANALYSIS-FIELD SHEETS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES~ INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
Project:
Location:--
...... ¢ITIUTT T '~ TNf~]] F- -
Noise Source: ~
Description:
III I I I l' I
Distance to Noise Source: ~ ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: ~.Time Completed:10:05 a.m.
~otal Time during Test Run: ~ m~x~mm/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg): ~ dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax): ~ dBA
NOTES:
III I
Data Recorded By:
Sheet of
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone 1516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
SCOT]' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
September 5, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re:
Site Plan for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM % 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
This is to ask you to comply with our environmental
consultant's recommendation that you complete Part III of the
Long Environmental Assessment form.
A copy of the consultant's letter is enclosed for your
convenience, along with a copy of Part III of the Assessment
form.
This office is sending a copy of the last revised site plan
to the consultant to see if it answers their questions.
If you have questions about the enclosed material, please
speak with Valerie Scopaz of this office.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals
Charles Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowskl, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Bo.ard
Towrt Hall, 53095-Mare Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Ore&on Ro, ad Rec)'cling Co.
SCTM No. 1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receiot of your letter of August 12, 1991, r.equesting that we complete a
review o.~ theproposec[ project incl.uding r?icw and c~=ec~mn of th~P~[~l ~, . _.
cempletmn of the Part H E~, and ~omultation ~ ~? now t9 proceec ~u.n r~vlcw o~ mis
project in accord with ~e State Environm~ntal Quah~ Re,now Act,
Pleme be advised that we have reviewed the do~mentation fo~rded to ~his o~ce.
A copy of the correae~ ~ng E~ ~F.I, ~d ~e completed ~g ~ ~zr~ are ~cluded
as ~ attachment to th~sJetter, m aomugn, we na~e respected the stte an~ oner u~e
follo~ng i~ormatlon ~th reg~d to review procedures.
~e site is presently in ac~ve us~ by O~k.S~eet~king~n~., for.t~e pu~ose, of
excavation ~nd drainage contra~mg, sg~l s~reemng ~ ~f~c?. '~ms u?)~em~con~u~eo
in a:cord wnh a ~re~ously approved she p[~ ~ ~n as ~onm$.~o~rq~.~pp~?~.,
~.tharlza'ion, ~e orogosed~se involves the aoaitlon ol re~cnng laGllil~$
~I~i~'~'{~l~]~-klud- e.a'coq'gr~te/?phah crasher and car re,cling (fluid removal, c~shmg or
cutting) and shipping off the site.
In t ms f xlstine site and environmental resources, soils and vegetatio~ have ~en
..... 11' however some landsca m
modified. ~e s~te Is pre~ominantly rock, earth an~ fi., . . ~P.
$omp)eted ne~ t~e ?a~ ?~ntage. ~ere were no s~gmficant vegetat~o~ 9r ~ldhfe resources
identified. ~e site ~ w~ln Groundwater Management Zone ~V ~nd ~s m th~no~m
border.of the Water Budget Area designated by SCD~S. ~e oep~ to gro~nowat,r
approximately ~0 feet, and ~rou~dwater benea}h the s:te.m~gratSs.n?rth. It ~s ~oted that
mtrate and a[dicar~ contamination h~ve,been ~d~ntified ln.t~e ~clm~ O~ th~ Site, and ~ere
is a landfill uptradient of the site which ~ under mves~gatmn to ~eter~e ~pa~t on}h~
aquifer, h is suspected that the l~dfill s~te may nave causeo grounawater aegraaa~on.
~e s~te m ~oned for :ndusm~ use. ~e ~ea surrounding the $~te,
~nd, ~est ~promma}ely 75~ feet.to Depot ~ ~d.sou/h to North Road m also zoned
industrial. ~ere are mtermHtem mdustn~ uses :n th~s area. ~e area north of Oregon
Road is zoned "A-C' dlstria. Mhd use ~nfli~ of ~e ~amltion ~om indus~i~ to "A-~
district were considered by the Pl~niqi Bqard i~the pr~iou} s~e pla~ }pprov~! w~ich
required a 100 foot setback for the faclli~ from oreggn ~oaa;~ i ne.spo2ect ~pn~on
sh6uld also be renewed in the context of reinsuring impacts trom ~ts tramH~on. I ne roaas
Page 1 of 3
54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 33!-1455
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Oregon Road Recycling
Envtronmcntnl Review
in thP. ~t'~a include Ore,on Road (eas;-wcst minor road to north). Cox's Lan.e ~ort.h;sou!h-
minor road to ~.,/est), Depot La. ne (north-south rmnor road to east), and N.o..rt~ ~.oaa (,east
west 4, !and dMdedhighway to south). These roads are prese.ntly undem, uhzed; however,
exp-~ ns~on industrial u.ses in the a. rea a. nd potential con. fl~ct, wgh residenual street traffic
shocld be considered m conneetmn wath the proposed pro,lect.
The ,T..own Board h~ considered, this action in the .authofi. zation o.f.a Recycling and
Salvage Faohty under Town Code Secuon 4-8-1. The use xs ¢o.m. ~stent $ohd w?te .
management geals of reducing the was.te stream through recychng; however, tmpacts wgh
regard to the specific .use must be considered...The Town Board re.cggnized this.
'~neluded many condiuons of the approval for tins use. These condmons ar.e mc,~u, oec~ ~,n..a
~"(~hd']fi~ned Negative DecIaratiofii'or the use da. ted March 17 1991..Thee mne.~y) ~n. muons
included in the (~etermination provide the Plaruung Board w~th a bas~s mr review ut the
project.
Based upon review of the conditions, and the information pr.esented to date, we fi.nfl
t.hat a Part III Long EAF should b.e prepared to address concerns w~th re. gard to.the spectfic
stt.e use. The..Lo. ng E..~. Part.III ts recommended as a means of address, mg.speafic concerns
prior by prov~d, mg add~t,onal !nfor.mauon necessary to re.nd.e.r a Det. er.mmauon of . '
~;i~nificance w~th re~ard to th,s acuon. The Part II RAP' md,.cates me ~mpa_ct ar?as - ,.n...
aoVdltion, specific re~luests for information are keyed to the rune (9) Town ~oarc cono,uons
~, fi~!lows:
v4) Tr..' applicant should provide .a deta!led site plaa,indi, ca.ting the loca. tion. 0.f al! .
structural site imurovements (including concrete/aspnan crusher. As o~ me oaze of
this letter, we hav'e not received this information.
2) __hmmPr~ · ' arv review of the noise data indicate possible, impact due. to noise ~levels: The
location o~'the equ!p, ment must be .kno .w~_to de, re,trane levels a~ lo?.auons ~.rom tr~e
machinery' . In addmon, sound barners (if neeue~), or souno reuua~on e.qmp.rne, nt
which may be available as an accessory on the equapme.nt should be e. xpmre~, m
ad-'dition, ~ve find no information concerning dust~emiss~ons from eqmpment as
required .by the Town Boa.rd. . .
3) The apphcant should prov, de a covenant r. egardmg hours o£operaUon. An upda?.
:he st&'us of this mitigation measure reqmr.ed.b.y the. Town. Board should be p. rovmen.
4) The source of recycling material shouldbe ~nd,cateo tn oroer to assess compnance
with previous con. ditio.ns of the.operation. . ........
5) A program, for rmtigataon of. no~ie, dust, od~s, and recto? sn.oum ne pr?anco oy me .
applicant an order for the. Town to have a means of deahng wah comp]rants and ~ssues
shbuld they arise. / . . .
6) The basis ~'or yehlcle trip en~ should be. provaded. The peak h.ourly.tn, p generation
should be indicated. Ir~ add!ti.on, the pr,mary hours of expecte~ truc~ regress ann
e~'ess to the site shoul~l b..e md,c.ated. . .
7) The status of the .waste..o. il.conmxnment sh.ed'approval should be mdacated.,Plarm for
construction of tbs fac,lgy should be p. rov, ded. . ........
8) The means of disl~osal of collected flmds should-~e-indacatec. At an ,nnustn.m. waste
scavenge.r is proposed to b.e used, the name of t.h.e sca..venge, r should be. pro. v~d. ed:~
9) The aoohcant should provide a covenant regaromg attowe9 access to tl~e she. o,V ~own
Officials and/or :egitihaately designated Town representauves. An update ut.me
status ufO, s miu~a.:ion measure required by theTown Board should be provtded. '
CRAMER V ,O~R~ ~///~SOCIATES
Page 2 ors
I
Or.on Road Re.cling
I Environmental Review
The information re~mested above should beprovided b7 the a.p,~lican.t.. Info.rmatl. o.n
ubmitted in the'oasic format of a Part IIILong.E.A.F p. ro~omg a ?.scu.mon ot me
uld be s . ' ocher hat
~ifica.nce of. the impact and propose.d .mmgauo.n to rmmm?e me impact. I e t.
~e apphcar}.t is best able.to provide this re. formation for review by the Board. If you w~sh
IA to rewew the submitted documentati.on, we would be pleased to provide a cost
Imate to review the material once submitted.
Thank y.o.u for the opportunit7 to provide you with this review, and please do not
lltate to callffyou have any
questions,
Very truly yo.urs, .
~C'~'arle'$ J. Vo~rhi$, AICP
I
Page 3 of 3
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, Texas 79120-1118 · Plant Site Address: 12100 1-40 East / 79101
June 20, 1991
Mr. Donald Grim
O~egon Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box.300
Cutchogue Long Island, NY 11935
Dear Mr. Grim:
Thank you for your recent inquiry on the Excel 2500 and
Excel 2200 Recycling plants.
In answer to your questions regarding the operating
noise levels of this equipment our reply is limited to tests
which are performed at our research and development site in
Amarillo, Texas. This testing is conducted under controlled
operating circumstance and is not representative of
operations under any other type of conditions. These test
results indicate the noise levels to be minus 85 decibels.
It is Excel's position that noise levels of our
equipment are dependent on a number of variables such as the
materials being processed, the power source (i.e. diesel or
electric), ect. These variables and the relative noise
levels cannot be predicted by Excel.
Sincerely Yours,
Myra Avant,
Project 'Coordinator
cc: Matt Garth
Wayne Schrandt
Office- (806) 335-3737 · · U.S. 1-800~858-4002 FAX # 806-335-3949
2500
CRUSHING 5YSV'E;VI ~
- 51'
JOB SPEC/FICA TIONS:
Material: Concrete w/steel rebar, Asphalt, Limestone
Discharge Product: Minus 2.5" X 0"
Design Rated Capacity: 200-400 TPH Approx.
Travel Height:13 6 Vibrating Feeder Size: 56 X 18 with
adjustable
grizzly
Operating Height: 13' 6" Crusher Size: Excel 25
Weight: 110,000 lbs. Crusher Feed Opening: 57" X 37"
Power Supply: Cat. 3406 (402 H,,P,) Tires: 11:00 X 22.5 (12)
Hopper Opening Size:19' X 7'10'
SPECIAL FEATURES:,
· Low-Profile Design - 13 6" travel height and 51' length permits highway transport.
· Hydraulic Lift-Mechanism - 6 hydraulic lift cylinders front, center and rear
CRUSHERS Excel,ecyc,ng & =fg., ~nc.- Amarillo, Texas 79120
Typical Feed Size:
CONCRETE AND CONCRETE
PiPE WITH STEEL REINFORCING
E (C;
Discharge:
PRODUCT
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.
CRUSHERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.. Amarillo, Texas 79120
I' Crushing For The ~uture ...
2200 LOW-PRO
rNG SYSTEM
Feed size - Reinforced Concrete, Brick & Block, Asphalt, Wood, Stone,
.Contaminated Materials.
D~scharge Product - 200 TPH
PLANT SPE~FICA TIONS:
Crusher Excel 15 impact Power
Crusher Opemng - 42"x31" CAT 3406 Diesel w/100KW Gen Set
Vibratin~ Gri=ly Feeder · 46"x16" 42" Discharge Conveyor
Step Gn=ly Bars 11.00x22.5 Tires
314" Steel H~pper Operators Catwalk w/Control Cab
Designed for quick set up, completely self-contained unit, (4) hinged support legs.
'
CRUSHERS or 806 335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, ~ 79120 ·
~" A'LL NEW -
I
I
I ·
~ "
I
! ,
!
!
EXCEL SUPER 2200 LOW-PRO
RECYCLING SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.-
Typical Feed Size:
BUILDING
RUBBLE
EA:CEL
CRUSHERS
or
l::xcel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, TX 79~20.
I tJO. DF PAGE~: 7 (Zncludin9 thl~ pagm)
P. O. Box 6t;47
M~dland. To,as 7971
(gls) 56348~3
c-~"F F-- V E
]F YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT US
IMMEDIATELY AT 3~~00-284-23~5. We are t~nn~mlLting fru,u a,,
NEC/NEFAX.
TO REPLY via FAX, DIAL DIRECT TO ~15-5~5-187i.
I
I
T.~:B ~.I TA 3W D~Y MFLD HYDRA GOV G~N SEf-DIE
=-'.d~ CENT ~OUND 6~.H~ !~SH~ 25~HZ 5~HZ 18~SHZ 2~HZ 4~HZ 8~P
:-;~ t. CAD DB(A) DB DB D~ DB DB D~ DB DB
Sc3 7~ ~9 B~ 97 87
-"~.-~ 7~ 99 8~ 87 87
223 64 ~9 85 ~7 87
--~ 5? ~9 8J 87 87
i ':2 51 ~q 85 87 ~7
DATE:
TIME:
I .:":'.SS xENTER,> TO C~JN F I I'JL~E
I NEXT I'RAN' .iNFO '-'" :
. ,.UP._ ~ C4 UNIT TYPE
I"k.l.F ' ' t.', - -'
~i ~4 92 ES 95
.~i .....?~ ........ ?2 ......sa.. s-~
~1 $'4 %2 E:~
i-G,KGSOI TMI - ENSINE ~ND COMF' F'EF~F DATE:
~',2 SEN SET EN~NE F'E~FORMANCE TIME:
~4~6D D~ TA ~W ~F:Y MFLD HYDRA GOV GEM SET-DIE
-,,,TIS ~_ SfA~D~Y SEN 515 K 8 18~ ~PPI W/O FAN~i~ HERTZ
.W.'O CO~E ~4 -~ (NOIE'E~ DATA ",, M~'~2~9 FEE~ % % ~ % % % ~' %
. -~, PER OVERALL OBCF OBCF OBCF OBCF OBCF OBCF 08CF OBCF
I NEXT ]'RAt.,': INFO CODE ( &4 ) [JlJI'l' TYPE [ E )
HELF' ( F'FI ) ACF~ (D'F'5) EX IT (F'F4) RETUF;?,~; Pfr 5 ) INDEX (F'FC?)
2~ 89 87 7~ 82
2~0 8S 87 7~ 8'2
24~ ?~ 87 7~ 82 80 79 82 81 7~
22~ 7~ 87 79 82 88 79 82 81 7& 81
Ee~ 6~ 87 7~ 82 ~0 7~ 82 81 'T& ...... =81
ZE~ ~7 87-. 7~ 82
14~ 44 87 7~ 82 80 7~ 82 81 7~ 8~
1Z8 32 87 79 82
~ 25 87 79 82 80 79 82 8i 76 8
~ 19 87 79 82 80 7~ 82
4~ !5 8~. 77 ~ 78 77 80 79 74
20 ~ 85 77 ~ 78 77
m
.-.-:ebb DX T~ JW bNY M~LD MYD~'.~ ~OV SEN SE'f-DIE
'.'>:47 ! ~-02 ~TANDSY "=
D~T~': 071J.tl~Y
515 1~ 8l 74 77 74 69 76 75 72 7!
:7~D 99 81 74 77 74
223
2~ ~ 81 7g 77 74 &g 78 76 72 7:
248 7S 81 74 77 74 6g 7~ 76 72 71
22~ 70 Bi 74 77 74 69
22~
._~ 57 81 /4 77 74 ~ 76 7~ 72 7
~ 81 ..Ta ... 77 74 ...~9 . ?S~... ..... 7~. . 72 .... 71
:z~ 44 El 74 77 74 ~ 76 7~ 72 7'
.... 7S 72
.~B ~ ~I 74 77 74 ~9 75 7
.~J ~2 Si 7~ 77 74 69 7~ 7~ 72 7
~ 25 ~i 7g 77 74 ~9 7~ 75 72 7
~ 19 81 74 77 74 69 76 7~. 72 7'
4~ .,?... 79 72 75 72 e7 74 74 7~ T
22 ~ 79 72 75 72 67 74 7~ 70 7
· 'FEES ,.Er~TER.~ T0 ~ONTINUE
;.JEST TAAt.i: INFO CODE ( D5 ) Ol' )l' TYFE ( ;: )
~'r.i !..': [ F'F t ) ACF2 (t-'F$) EX I T (F'F'4) .RE T UF:N ( F'F' 5 ,, H'~DEX (PFg)
L
I
I
PERF Ib~T~:
I!,SEN SEf ENGINE ~.E~A'0~:;~ANCE ] i;IE:
.3~i. ~I TA '"~ DRY NF'LD HYDRA GOV SEN SET-DiE
. "'-' PEA OVE~;~LL 086~" ' OBCF OBCF OBCF oBCF u.u~ OBCr.
'^.~ CENT BOUND
-W LOAD DB~A) DB DB DB DB DB DB DB
I~?D ';~ i 1~5
I'-D ~, I ('~? le~ 10? ~0 102 9& ~7 -...
I i'd 6 97 94
DB
NEXT" ..... :NFO CODE I 5~ ) uNIT T'¥FE ( E )
'P..,t IND6X (PFg)
:,.-..,_F ,L r. FI) A.,.~,r,~',F'.%) ~'.XI]'fF'F4) .- ,
S5
S2
7~
77
75
I
I
-G~G~Jl TMI - ~NG;I'JS AMD COf".W' P'~RF DAT~:
DB(A) DB DB DB DB DB DB DB
248 76 92 88 ~0 8~ 92 84 85 79
n~,~ 7~ 192 87 98' 85 ~2 84 84 78
~o 5~ 9z 8~ ........ ~ e~. 9~ ...... ~__.. ~2 ....... ZZ_ ..
24~ 44 fi~ ....... ~5 87 ..... 8~ .... 89'' 8! -' 82 76
5~ .-,"~ BY 63 85 8~ 87 79 79 74
4D 15 95 ~0 85 78 85 77 77 72
* * *
I!NFO CO~E
GEN PER
PWR CENT
I KWLOAD
I
I
I-
I
I
I r-.'--.ESB .',ENTER:, TO CONTINUE
NEXT ]'RAN: iNFO CuU~ t 0.5 ) DNIT TYF'E (
I P:ELF (F'F l ) A:]F2 ( F'FJ ) EXiT (F'F4) F:ETURN (F'FS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
E )
I
· -.~"~=~i TM, I - ~'"~'r_,..ol~_¢ Arjr,,. CG~IF' ~E~.F DATE:
-3 - SEN SET ENGINE F-&, ..~ ,~ ..~E TIME.
....... D~ TA~"",,, _R, t~FLD M'fb~A ~3V GEN SET-D~E
2,:,9 8."3.,
'_'-:'3 /kO.
:':3 57
· " 44
, 7. 5 .3 8
' Z3 32
OBCF 0BO;
DB D~:
NEXT T~AN: ].NFO CODE t E)4 ) uNIT TYF'E ( E
HELP(F'F I ) ACF 2 ~, F'F i. ) EX ITiF'F4) ,=;E TU;RN ~ FF '5 )
-.~ ,_l.,El.-., TO CONTINUE
~-, 7q B~ 78 78 72
85 ~0 8Z 78 85 77 77 71
84 8~ 52 77 54 ?~ 76 71 ~6
53 7~ · 81 76 ~' ,.'
--=~ ?S gD .... ,, .._~'" 74 74 6~.
~1 77 79 75 51 75 74 68
E~ 75 ,rS 74 8~ ~'~,. 7~ 67
7~ 75 77 7% 7q 71 /_
7~ 74 7~ -2/ 78 7~ 71 ~,
77 72 75 7~ 77 6~ t~ cZ,
m m m m m m .,m m ,,m m mm m m m m m m m m
Auto Crank Case 05)~ STATEMENT
?ELEPHONE:
L~
STREBEL'$ &AUNDRY, INC.
°ol o
117190
!
SOUTHOLD TONN COLLECT[ON CENT~
OECEMB~ [9S0
SCALEHOUGE MONTHLY REPORT
I
I Itel
Cumulative 1990 Monthly Material Suliary (in TDNS) Through DECEMBER 31
JAN FEB MAR ~R hAY ZUN JUL AU6 SEP
OCT NOV DEC TOTAL
Chargeable
I Brush 134.65 167.31 298.47 691.94 266.75 379.95 526.31 355.04 206.81 266.98 336.92 216.00 3847,03
C & 0 477.43 371.34 606.41 491.65 565.99 474.47 996.40 468.[1 597.13 656.17 589.77 660.65 6655.52
I Concrete 36.22 73.00 104.25 120.66 42.44 67.32 280.41 10].54 67.85 65.50 16.67 5i.[4 1049.00
Landclearing [50.56 626.17 1037.32 140.53 [6[.36 [74.9[ 2i2.74 [[0.39 [07.88 1[6.38 ]04.44 4[.12 2963.82
Rubbish (lixed) 204.00 166.44 433.78 337.61 257.52 257.35 454.[3 331.95 264.04 317.59 276.11 314.96 3615.46
Scrap Metal 57.3[ 5[.77 5'7.31 52.16 42.[9 49.89 53.14 70.68 56.29 I01i8 4[.37 49.52 690.9l
I Tires 16.54 [4.95 16.54 24.05 23.27 20.00 [4.27 15.56 10.00 8.68 22.00 25.00 210.86
1076.73 1470.98 2554.08 1958.60 1359.52 1443.69 2437.40 1453.27 1310.00 1540.38 1389.28
Non-chargeable
ITOTAL:
1358.49 [9252.62
65.73 85.79 72.93 77.32 60.02 436.11
1776.54 1529.01 1297.51 1065.64 1065.42 17009.77
I Agricultural 38.37 11.13 5.66 10.72 5.56 0.52 2.36
Garbage 1234,37 962.64 1145.13 1264.33 1330.61 1603.99 2734,58
Leaves/Grass
/flulch 46.00 43.32 182.79 397.47 407.14 357.40 394.04
I Sand/Sod 56.29 791.26 349.38 163.84 583.30 569.16 511.09
Shellfish 0.62 3.32 10.89 15.24
Sludge 20.66 17.17 18.04 37.03 8.44 58.00 142.01
I Wood Chips 4.27 10.36 4.85 lO. lO 10.98
Household
RecyclabIes 37.34 34.71 53.50 60.79 68.77 70.56 106.99
254.99 187.77 239.74 312.64 418.98 3244.27
920.60 229.00 1039.59 36[.02 747.62 6322.[5
5.00 5.35 11.25 10.60 0.54 62.61
66.65 41.23 33.04 69.34 9.65 521.26
20.25 10.47 19.29 7.72 6.94 105,22
li9.59 118.54 108.37 92.33 116.81 988.30
I TOTAL: i435.03 1864.50 i765.47 193%03 2407.14 2680.62 3917.29 3229.35 2207.16 2821.71 1996.61
IGRANO TOTAL: 2511.76 3335.48 4319.55 3797.63 3766.66 4124.51 6354.69 4682.62 3517.16
2425,98 28689.89
4362.09 3395.89 3794.47 47942.51
Waste Oil
(gallons) 1380 850 1125 1135 1390 555 1655 1145 1150 1255 1333 1279 14261
Toxics
(I of 55
9al druls) 17 16 Il 9 12 -
Non-chargeable 'recyclable5' are glass, plastic containers, tin and aluminum cans,
ney[papert corrugated, batteries, and office paper. Among chargeable items, scrap
il[al and tires are also recycled.
NOTE:
-1-
65
I
IItel Chargeable
I Srush
· CLD
'CoflcTete
· Landclearing
· Rubbish (mixed)
-- Scrap fletal
Tires
I TOTAL:
I ·
hgricultural
· Garbage
· Grass
~ Leaves/Grass
/Nulch
I Sand/Sod
· Shellfish
Sludge
· Wood Chips
· Household
Recyclables
ITOTAL:
IGRANO TOTAL:
I Waste Oil
(gallons)
I Toxics
· (I of 55
gal drulS)
~ NOTE:
!
Cuiulative lggl Nonlhiy Naterial Sunlary (in
JAN F~ NAR APRIL
NAY
226.57 160.72 449.92 645.79 189.34
181.70 214.57 385,11 471.95 4&0. i4
7.21 11,52 18.67 39.11 44.95
47,61 48.05 43.73 55,91 139.13
140.14 161.20 226,65 310.43 299.53
82.52 27.66 36.48 53,81 40.00
32.25 26.77 17.00 20.00 19.96
719.00 650.49 1177.56 1597.00 1192.47
Non-chargeable
120,57 7.&l 6.85 1%92 5.46
992.56 908.29 1009,17 1155.26 1097.17
J s e e 251.24
90,08 61.73 196.70 467.05 184.05
1.72 556.57 744.74 528.20 1111.99
- 2.32
175.15 303.93 12.87 1.39 39.35
1.32 0.19 7.10 7.17 3.47
112.30 92.99 124.6i 145.81 134.70
1493.70 1931.31 2102.04 2322.79 2829,75
2581,80 3279.60 3919.79 4022.22
2211,70
854 530 2317 1825 1585
30 9 14 10 12
Non-chargeable 'recyclables* are glass, plastic containers,
nevspaper, corrugated, batteries, and office paper. Among
metal and tires are al~ recycled.
Grass not counted separately until Nay 1991.
SOUTHOLD TOWN COLLECTION CENTER
JUNE 1991
SCALEHOUSE NONTHLY REPORT
TONS) Through JUNE 30
JUNE
Total
Tons
% Change % Change From
From Hay June 1990
251.58 32.5l -33,82
402.46 -12.5% -15.2Z
13.77 -69.4% -84.2!
4%69 -64,31 -71.61
315.95 5.72 22.8Z
49.68 24.2l -0.4%
22.00 10.1% 10.0%
1105.13 -7.3Z -23.5l
1.00 -B1.7% g2.32
1341.72 22.3Z o15.4%
136.97 -45.52 s
94,04 -48. g% -83.5%
477.11 -57, tZ -16.2Z
5.11 120.33 -53.1Z
47.99 22.0Z -17.33
3.58 3.22
158.84 17.9I 125.12
2265.36 -IS.3Z -15.51
3371,49 -16.2! -18.3%
1305 -17.7% 135. i%
19 58.3! Iii. Il
tin and aluminum cans,
chargeable itels, scrap
YTD % CHANGE
TOTAL FROH YTD
TONS LAST YEAR
1923.92 -0.82
2115.93 -29.2%
135.23 -70.81
384.12 -83.22
1453.30 -12.32
290.15 -6.6Z
138.00 19.6%
6440.65 -34.0Z
159.41 121.52
6404.17 -15,1%
388.21 s
1093.65 -23.81
3520.33 40.1%
7.43 -4g.92
580.67 264.4%
22.83 -22.8%
769.25 136.22
12945.95 7.12
19386.50 -11.3%
8416 30.8%
94 80.82
m
MATERIAL Summary ~ru__ page
I . . . Date 01-11-9o
Time 16-o51~s~1 Net Weight Tot ChaRge
R ~ 1961
~ B .~ 198660
"- S l~U .... ~ ~b ~ O. O0
-- L 54 l~zv ~b ~ ~ 437.00
' I 76460
~/~.,~ '_ ~,oo ~ o. oo
~ ~ a o / ~ O. O0
~? Z~O $ ~1740 lb
~ ~;' OT ~ ~ ~ v. v~
~ P ~ ..... 1 b ~ 8~7. b
~ . 14 .... ~? ~ 0.00
RM ~ ~05~0 1 b
~ SA
~ S Net Weight Tot Chapge
Repo?t Totals ~ of Lo~S 11956~0 lb ~459.00
m' End of Report
m
m - MATERIAL Summapy ~ page I
m Time 16:53:19 Date 01-1'8-90
MATERIAL ~ of Loads Net Weight Tot Chapge
m . o. oo
BR 35 76480 lb~ 158.40
m G 1~7 606600 lb ~// O. O0
~epopt Totals e of Loads Net Weight Tot Chapge
588 11a8190 lb
~ End of Repopt
· ~ I/~,,c/
m MATERIAL Summary ; ~' page
Time 16:59:[)6 Date 01-,°5-90
'RIAL # of Loads Net Weight Tot Cha~ge
I ~ a 10~40 ib ~ 0.00
m ~ ~4 a~oo i b ~2/ 1 a~. aO
~ C ld5 20~560 lb~ 1998.00
~ , ~ 5580 lb ~/ 55.80
,, ~ ~ ~c0~ .. o 4~sao ~l b ~- o. oo
W ~ ~ ~a aa~oo l~ ~o. oo
m ~L 1 ~Tao 1 ~ ~ o. oo
,~ tals ~ of ~oads Net Weight Tot Chapge
_popt To 424 90~R50 lb ~87~.~0
m :
m
MATERIAL Summary ~/~ page 1
~ATERIAL -- Net Weight ~ Tot ChaY'ge
22?40 I b y/~, O. O0
~.4000 lbd~ .~40. O0
co~ · -~ ~aaaoo ~ ~ ~/~ o. oo
'" ~ ~o~o ~ ~ ~/f/ o. oo
S~ 1
~L ~ 1~200 lb (V 0.00
Totals ~ of Loads Net Weigh~ Tot Chapge
55~ 1~59080 lb 6~.40
End of Septet
5
~404.80
,::',0~00
· .. .c. · :'0. O0
8R ]49 97400 :b/~/ 11~.60
C 158 118360 lb
C~RD I 44~0 lb 0,00
CCL 6 ~20 lb v~/ o. oo
CON 3 SO00 lb 60.00
FIR ~7 0 lb ~65.00
FP 46 0 lb 96,00
FT ~ 0 lb v/ 100.00
GR 106
34 7560 lb ~ 0.00
REC 18 45900 lb 0,00
S 4 1860 lb ~ 0.00
SA 33 1~70770 lb / 0.00
WC 10 34780 lb / 0.00
Time Date 16:01:55 07/31/91
IR 3 6980 I b v/ O. O0
BR 188 110180 lb ~ 1~50.40
C 191 191140 lb 3818.80
~ARD I 6060 lb O* O0
a] 3~oo lb o. oo
W~ I 7740 lb ~ 0.00
page I
ld GROUP
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS · ARCHITECTS · PLANNERS · SCIENTISTS · SURVEYORS
MELVILLE, N.Y. TOTOWA, N.J.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Maureen C. Ostermann
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1809
July 18, 1997
TO:
COMMISSIONER
N.Y.S. DE'PARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
TO WtIOM IT MAY CONCERN
RE:
MOTOR VEIIICLE REPAIR StlOP
OREGON RD. RECYCLING, INC.
TYPE OF BUSINESS: RECYCLING, SALVAGE, REPAIRS,
STOCKPILING, AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
PARCEl, 1I) 1000-83-3-t.5 (11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue)
ZONING: l.ight Industrial Zone District
Dear Sir or Madam:
This will confirtn ttmt Oregon Road Recycling, Inc. is in
receipt of zooing apl)rovnls from this Department which will authorize
the repair of motor vehicles and advertisemcat (for purposes of
selling) under Application No. 40,ti approvals issued September 12,
1991, attd June 25, 1986. Permitted activities iaclude up to 10% for
advertisement of repaired vehicles, as well as dismantling,
salvaging, and repairs.
CC:
GERARD P. GOEIIRIbfGER /
Recyctin-- m.,g.~Il CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF APPEALS
Oregon
Road
Oregon Rd. Recycling, Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
(516)-734-7078
July 1, 1997
Southold Town Zoning Board
Mare Road
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Zoning Board:
I am the owner of Oregon Rd. Recycling, Inc. which has your approval.
I am looking to acquire a repair shop license and used auto and truck dealers license from
the Department of Motor Vehicles.
I am asking at this time that you write a letter to Motor Vehicle stating the zoning is
correct.
Sino~rely, / ,
NgYork State Department of Motor Vehicles
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ~
FORM VS-1 -- ORIGINAL FACILITY APPLICATION
These instructions are based on applicable sections of the New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law and Rcgulatious of thc
Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.
1. Every applicant for an original business cer~,-~t~ must complet~ and sign Form VS-I, Original Facility Application. Complete
the specific section(s) for each business for which you are applying.
2. DO NOT FILL IN THE SHADED AREAS OF THE APPLICATION. Prat or t/pe ad ~furma~on..~ver ~11 applicable
questions. ~
3. Attach a copy of a Business Certifi,'~te obtained from your County Clerk fur the name in which you will be doing business.
If you are an INDIVIDUAL and will do business under an assumed business name ("doing business as" or DBA name),
auach a copy of the Business CertiP__c!-' of Assum-,d Name. If you will operate a PARTNF_,R~HIP doing business under
an assumed name (DBA), attach a copy of the parmership papers indicating both the parmership and the DBA name.
4. If your business is a CORPORATION, which may include an assumed corporation name (DBA), attach the filing receipt
issued by the Secretary of Slate. (If the business will operate under aa assumed coq~oration name, both the name of the
corporation holding ownership and the "doing business as" name (DBA) must be h'~icated on the filing receipt.) In Question
No. 12 on VS- 1, you ar~ required to list the president, vice president, secretary, and treasurer of the corporation, regardless
of whether or not they own any stock. If a position is vacant, indicate that on the form.
5. if yon have employee~, atutch proof of Worker's Compeusation coverage and Disability Insurance coverage- This should
be a statement containing the insurance company name and policy number(s).
6. If you do not have employees, annch a Statement of Exemption (Form C-105.21) or a signed statement that you do no~
have employees.
7. Be sure your business complies with zoning and other local laws. Your locality administers these ordinances regarding
businesses that you may operate. This is your obligation. State law requires that Dismantier, Salvage Pool and Repair Shop
applicants provide proof of compliance with local ordinances before a registration can be issued.
8. Repair Shop, Iuspeotion Station, Motor Vehicle Dealer, Transporter, and Boat Dealer applications reqnire a non-refundable
application fee. If you apply for a Repair Shop Registration and Inspection Station License at the same tirne, the combined
application fee is $25. The Boat Dealer applica~on fee is always $10. The two-year busir~ss fee must accompany ad
applications.
NON-REFUNDABLE APPLICATION FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Repair Shop Applications
Inspection Station
Motor Vehicle Dealer/Transporter
Junk and Salvage Businesses
Any combination of 2 or more of the above
Boat Dealers
$10
$25
None
$25
$10 (In addition
to any other
applicaton fee)
Section A of VS-1 Application
Secliun B of VS-I Application
Section C of VS-I Application
Section E of VS-I Application
Section C of VS-I Application
9. Give your Sales Tax numar in Question -1 on the application if you are required by state law to collect sales tax. If you
have filed for a Sales Tax number but have no~ received it, indicate this un the application.
10. All applicants must complete Form VS-19 (Statement of Ownership and/or Pero~_i~*!on For Use of P~,,~' of Business).
l 1. Di.smsntler applicants must auach a copy of proof of property ownership from the lessor in addition to a copy of the
13.
· u peciai instructions under Sections A-E which apply to your business(es). The Division of Vehicle Safety Services
may aspect your premises and interview you before approving your application. If you do not meet the requirements,
your application will not bc approved and you may not be rescheduled for another interview for at least 30 days.
Attach a check or money order (payable to "ComnUSsiouer of Motor Vehicles") to your completed and signed application.
If you have a current Vehicle Safety business license, registration or ccn. ification, call (518) 473-5832 for a prorated fee.
Failure to do so could delay the processing of your application. Mall to:
Bureau of Consumer and Pacflity Services
PO Box 2700 - ESP
Albany NY 12220-0700
ARention: Application Unit
14. If your facility is loc,,ued ootaido a city or incotT)orated village, altach a s,;_purato diagrsm showing your l~cafion in relation m:
a. the nearest hi.way or crossroad;
b. a well-known public building or landmark;
c. if any of the above are ~ applicable, the numbers of the telephone poles nearest you.
15. DO NOT SEND AN APPLIHATION TO DMV UNTIL YOU ME[ET ALL THE RE[QUIRE[ME[NTS.
SECTION A
Repair Shop Registration
Authority: Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 398;
Commissioner's Regulations Part 82
Application Fee: $10'
Two-Yeur Business Fee: $150
All ieee must be sent with the application.
Complete Section A on the application: ff you intend to repair or diagnose motor vehicle malfunctions or repair motor vehicle
bodies, fenders or other components damaged by accident or otherw~e; OR operate a shop, drive-in station or garage which
inspects motor vehicles for the purpuse of evaluating or estimating the dollar value of motor vehicle damage or for dettrmining
the necessity and cost of motor vehicle repairs. A mobile repair shop reg~"tration may be issued to a facility that conducts its
business from a vehicle at a location provided by the consumer.
Send a copy of a certificate of occupancy. OR a local license OR .a Inner fl'om your local authority ,tn~ip5 thn~; y. y~Our husiltess
.ala~o~em.to at this location and ~at no I,~l licenst; is required. ;I'be letter must be on the authority Iem:rhead and con,in '
the following: full uafl~c and add'ss of thc business; type of business; a s~arcmcnt that you may operate a Motor Vehicle Repair
Shop at the location indicaf~l on your application and that no local license or permit is requL,*ed; the wri~en signature, printed
name and title of the official prcpm'ing the leUcr (that is, Town Supentisor, City Manager, exc.); and the date. The letter must
specify Motor Veh~l~ Repair Shop.
'If applying for a Repair Shop Registration and Inspection Station License st the same time,
the combined appllcstlon fee le $25.
All motor vehicle repair shops iht service and/or repah- motor vehicle air conditioners must have equipment to recover and
recycle air conditioner refrigc~u~s. This equipment muat be a type approved by the New York State Dcpamneot of Environmemat
Conservation. Until Stnnanrds are developed by the New York State Dcpem=ent of Envirommmtal Conservation, equipment
meeting Society for Automotive Engineers standard SA:E J1991 (1989) will be acee~. For a list of approved equipment, contact
the New York Slate Depemueut of Environmental Conservation Divison of Air Resources at (518) 457-3200.
AU motor vehicle repair shops engaging in the repair or servicing of vehicle air conditioners (regardless of repnir shop size)
are required to have ~ cqnipment by January 1, 1992. With the application for rep~r shop, attach eith~ a manufacturer's
ccrtificale or an invoice as proof of purchase of ~is equipment. These dc~u~mts mt~ aim con~in the name and swl~ress of
the ~c'pair shop and the numufacturer, thc date the equipment was punthased and thc serial munber of the unit purchased.
Oregon Rd. Recycling, Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
(516)-734-7078
July 1, t997
Southold Town Zon~ug Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Zoning Board:
I am the owner of Oregon Rd. Recycling, Inc. which has your approval.
I am looking to acquire a repair shop license and used auto and truck dealers license fi-om
the Department of Motor Vehicles.
I am asking at this time that you write a letter to Motor Vehicle stating the zoning is
correct.
APPEAI~S BOAkD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Serge Doyen
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Maureen C. Ostermann
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Somhold, New York 1197t
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1809
Jaly 18, 1997
TO:
COMMISSIONER
N.Y.S. DEPAP, TMENT OF MOTOR VEIIICLES
'FO WIIOM 1T MAY CONCERN
RE:
MOTOR VEtIICLE REPAIR SHOP
OREGON RI). RECYCLING, INC.
TYPE OF BUSINESS: RECYCLING, SAI,VAGE, REPAIRS,
STOCKPILING, AND OTIlER ACTIVITIES
PARCEL Il) 1000-83-3-4.5 (11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue)
ZONING: Light Industrial Zone Distrirt
Dear Sir op Madam:
This will coafimn that Oregon Road Recycling, Inc. is in
receipt Of zoning approvals from this Dopamment which will authorize
the repair of molop vehicles and adw~vtisement (fop purposes of
selling) nndep Apl)lieation No. ,10,11 apl)royals issued September 12,
1991, and Juae 25, 1986. Per'milled aetivilies include up to 10~ for
advertisement of vel)aired vehicles, as well as dismantling,
salvaging, and repairs.
Very trnly yoars,
'' D
GERAR P. GOEltRINGER
CHAIRMAN, BOARI) OF APPEALS
cc: Oregon Road Recycling, Inc.
P~ge 4 ~ Appl. No.
Matter of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
Decision Rendered September 12, 1991
issuance of state, county and other agency permits or
approvals.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:
Goehringer, Dinizio and Villa. ~
adopted.
Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen,
This resolution was duly
lk
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLEBK
Town Clerk, Town of Southo}d
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTI' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
September 30, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appl. No. 4041 - Special Exception (Rec¥c}ing Yard)
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
Attached please find a copy of the determination rendered by the
Board of Appeals concerning your application for approval of a
recylcing and salvage facility, in conjunction with the
permitted existing uses.
Please be sure to return to the Planning Board (and the Building
Department) as well as any other agency for such permits or
other approvals which are appropriate for this project. A copy
of this decision has simultaneously herewith been transmitted to
the Planning Board and Building Inspector for their files and
update.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Enclosure
Copy of Decision to:
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
P
RECYCLING &
MANUFACTURING, INC.
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, Texas 79120-1118 · Plant Site Address: 121001-40 East / 79101
June 20, 1991
Mr. Donald Grim
Oregon Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box.300
Cutchogue Long Island,
NY 11935
Dear Mr. Grim:
Thank you for your recent inquiry on the Excel 2500 and
Excel 2200 Recycling plants.
In answer to your questions regarding the operating
noise levels of this equipment our reply is limited to tests
which are performed at our research and development site in
Amarillo, Texas. This testing is conducted under controlled
operating circumstance and is not representative of
operations under any other type of conditions. These tes~
results indicate the noise levels to be minus 85 decibels.
It is Excel's position that noise levels of our
equipment are dependent on a number of variables such as the
materials being processed, the power source (i.e. diesel or
electric), ect. These variables and the relative noise
levels cannot be predicted by Excel.
Sincerely Yours,
Myra Avant,
Project Coordinator
cc: Matt Garth
Wayne Schrandt
Office - (806) 335-3737 U.S. 1-800-858-4002 FAX # 806-335-3949
2500 L OI~III. PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
Typical Feed Size:
CONCRETE AND CONCRETE
PIPE WITH STEEL REINFORCING
Discharge:
PRODUCT
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.
EL
CRUSHERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.. Amarillo, Texas 79120
EXCEL 2500 LOW-PRO
SYSTEM
51'
i
t
13' 6"
JOB SPECIFICATIONS:
Material: Concrete w/steel rebar, Asphalt, Limestone
Discharge Product: Minus 2.5" X 0"
Design Rated Capacity: 200-400 TPH Approx.
PLA N T SPECIFICATIONS:
Travel Height:13' 6"
Operating Height: 13' 6"
Weight: 110,000 lbs.
Power Supply: Cat. 3406 (402 HP)
Hopper Opening Size:19' X 7'10"
Vibrating Feeder Size: 56" X 18' with adjustable grizzly
Crusher Size: Excel 25
Crusher Feed Opening: 57" X 37"
Tires: 11:00 X.22.5 (12)
SPECIAL FEATURES: · Low-Profile Design - 13' 6" travel height and 51' length permits highway transport.
· Hydraulic Lift-Mechanism - 6 hydraulic lift cylinders front, center and rear
'ii 71EXCEL ]- 0-858-4002
CRUSHERS ,:xce~ ,ec,~c,ng & r~.,,., ,.c...",,~ar,,o.'rex;s'~'l~'O
EXCEL SUPER 2200 LOW-PRO
RECYCLING SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Typical Feed Size:
BUILDING
RUBBLE
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.
Discharge:
PRODUCT
EXC E L J ~, 8~0~0-, ~,~-4~0
CRUSHERS or 806-335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, TX 79120
C/ushing ~or The ~utur~
2200 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
JOB SPECIFICATIONS:
Feed size. Reinforced Concrete, Brick & Block, Asphalt, Wood, Stone,
Contaminated Materials.
Discharge Product - 200 TPH
PLANT SPEGI£1CA TIONS:
Crusher · Excel 15 Impact
Crusher Opening · 42 "x31"
Vibrating Grizzly Feeder - 46"x16"
Step Grizzly Bars
314" Steel Hopper
3-Axle Chassis
SPECIAL FEATURES:
Designed for quick set up, completely self-contained unit, (4) hinged support legs.
Power
CAT 3406 Diesel w/100KW Gen Set
42' Discharge Conveyor
11.00x22.5 Tires
Operators Catwalk w/Control Cab
Eriez Magnet
LOW-PROFILE - CRUSH AND MOVE
FIELD PROVEN
EXCEL
CRUSHERS
or 806-335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 · Amarillo, TX 79120
Page 17 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Burt Lewis,
Southold Z.B.A.
Jr.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Would the cars that were being parked
in front of this building be normally parallel to the
building or would they be diagonally?
MR LEWIS: Correct.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: They would parallel to the building.
Before you sit down, let's see if there's any other
questions, alright. Does anybody have any other questions
concerning this? Bob? Jim? Serge?
MR LEWIS: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Is there anybody else who
would like to speak in favor of this application? Anybody
like to speak against the application? No further questions,
I make a motion closing the hearing reserving decision until
later.
Ail in Favor - AYE.
Appl. No.: 4041
Applicant(s): Donald and Jeanne Grim
Location of Property: 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue,
County Tax Map No.: 1000-83-3- part of 4.4
The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:22 pm and read the
notice of hearing and application for the record.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I have a copy of a site plan from John
Metsker licensed land surveyor. The most recent date if
February 1, 1990 indicating the site plan at this particular
facility and the special exception and I have a copy of the
Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding
properties in the area. Mr. Grim would you like to be heard.
You have nothing to say. Alright, well we always have the
questions. So I'll ask you step up to the mike. I had
recently viewed your facility on a Sunday morning about two
weeks ago, my question is are you limiting this recycling
facility to any specific goods? Will it be, I'm asking a
question and answering at the same time, and stop me if I'm
incorrect. I noticed that there were vehicles that you were
going to dismantle. Is that correct?
MR GRIM: Yes.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So there will be steel in salvage of
steel, aluminum or metals and so on and so forth.
MR GRIM: Yes.
Page 18 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Donald and Jeanne Grim
Southold Z.B.A.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Will you be dealing with construction
debris?
MR GRIM: Yes.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Okay, and that will be done also in a
prescribed area of this particular yard. Alright. What
other areas would you be dealing with?
MR GRIM: Concrete and asphalt and tree stumps and things
like that.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: You would be grinding tree stumps?
Okay. The cars themselves will they be dismantled in any
other way other than by pieces or will they be actually put
through a shredder or?
MR GRIM: No. Ail we're going to do is save what parts we
think are good and what parts we can sell and the rest of the
car that we can't sell we'll probably just take them to a
payloader and flatten the roof and put a trailer and send it
some place else. It's not bad enough right now.
CHAIRM3d~ GOEHRINGER: Based upon any all affluent or anything
that would be coming out of these vehicles or anything, they
are all going into prescribed drainage pits meaning health
department standards and all this.
MR GRIM: Right. The car would be put inside and all the
fluids would be drained on the side of the building we're
going to make a waste shed so after you drain it you
don't have to go outside with the oil, there's going to a
funnel going through the wall into a shed which will be an
approved, I think there made by North Fork Welding, one of
those steel bins and probably be reburned in a waste that
will be already in the garage, so that you only have to
handle it once. It like, if you have to take it outside,
there's more chance of spilling so you can set up a simple
way of doing this. Then the car would come outside and be
flattened and put on a trailer.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: What would be the maximum height that
you would stacking cars, assuming there wasn't a market for
them?
MR GRIM: I thought like a legal height of going down the
street, 13 feet 6 inches, because if I put them on the
trailer that's what's got to go down the street and you know,
I wouldn't go sky high.
Page 19 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Donald & Jeanne Grim
Southold Z.B.A.
CHAIRSLkN GOEHRINGER: Okay. Crushed or not crushed it's not
going to exceed 13 feet 6 inches.
MR GRIM: Yeah, I thought that"would be a happy number.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, that's fine. You want to briefly
just clue us in in reference to the height of the plantings
that you intend to use for screening, I know that you've
discussed this with the Planning Board under the site plan.
MR GRIM: Right, Valerie asked me to go into the street, put
up a stick and if my eyesight hit that stick how high would
it be where I wanted the height to be and as long as I was
over that plain. So like if you're standing in the road you
have berm and you have a ten foot bush and you follow that
plain, and that's higher than what I have in equipment she
said that was fine.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So the bushes in the front, they're
going to be approximately 10 feet in height eventually?
MR GRIM: Well I think there's a 4 foot berm and a 6 foot
tree.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: On top of the berm, okay.
MR GRIM: So that would give me roughly.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Okay the only other question I have is
in reference to noise pollution.
MR GRIM: Okay.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: What degree since you are not going to
have a shredder which probably would be the greatest in noise
pollution what other noise would be elucidated from this
facility?
MR GRIM: There would be some noise from like a payloader and
a screening plant, but most of them are run by a small like
motor which is equivalent to what all the farmers have up
there for their pumps and I don't see it being a problem.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: You are not bringing in a crane with a
wrecking ball and anything like that to drop it on cars to...
MR GRIM: No. Everything will be done with the payloader and
you know it's pretty quite, but you know somebody has to run
the payloader.
Page 20 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Donald & Jeanne Grim
Southold Z.B.A.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: How loud is the grinder for the tree
stumps?
MR GRIM: I don't have any spe~s on that yet, I do have some
specs on the asphalt and concrete crusher and the Planning
Board has the full specs on them. (TURNED TAPE OVER) These
are the two I'm looking at and..
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Can I have one of these?
MR GRIM: You can have more as long as I can get them back,
if you could make copies?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Okay. Let's assume that the concrete
crusher made more noise than what the neighbors across the
street would say. Avail themselves since we don't have a
noise ordinance in the town, would you be willing to go back
farther on the property with that when you were crushing
concrete?
MR GRIM: Sure. Whatever keeps everybody happy.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I should point out for the audience
that this is probably the first legal recycling facility
other than our own landfill thats ever been approved in the
Town of Southold, isn't that correct? I mean the other ones
were pre-existing, is that correct?
MR GRIM: I think so.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Yeah, I think we're correct in saying
that alright. So that's basically the reason why I'm
bringing this issue up, okay.
MEMBER DOYEN: Is it the same kind that reduces the metal
reinforcement in concrete to, you know you have here, here's
the reinforcing in the concrete.
MR GRIM: Right.
MEMBER DOYEN: So when that's ground up what happens to it?
MR GRIM: There's a magnet belt over here and.
MEMBER DOYEN: Oh, okay.
MR GRIM: The one belt goes up, this other belt spins fast
and takes it out and it separates it.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Would that be used for real
Page 21 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Donald & Jeanne Grim
Southold Z.B.A.
CHAIRMAN, cont'd: construction, Don? The crushed concrete.
MR GRIM: Yes. It goes back for a sub base, so you are
taking something that would golinto the landfill and just be
buried and you get to reuse it again. It is State approved.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: And you would be selling that from the
site?
MR GRIM: Correct. That would be stock piled in that back
area where we have the stock piled material.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Okay. I don't have any other
questions, we'll ask Mr. Villa if he has any.
MEMBER VILLA: Yeah, I was just wondering I was looking at
the resolution that was passed by the Town Board and they
state in here that you would be, you should have no more than
five 55 gallon drums to store the toxic and hazardous
materials.
MR GRIM: That's what I'm approved for now, we're going back
to the Department of Health for a 500 of waste oil 500 of
fuel. That's approved on the property now. We're going back
to them in another package which is going back to
I think he over sees everything and it's
being...
MEMBER VILLA: So you are going to the Health Department for
an Article 12 permit? That's a toxic...
MR GRIM: I'm just learning some of this. I thought it was
an Article 7.
MEMBER VILLA: Article 7 is...
MR GRIM: I could be wrong.
MEMBER VILLA: That depends on how they look at it.
ME GRIM: Okay.
MEMBER VILLA: I sent all your deep recharge requirements.
MR GRIM: I had a deal with...
MEMBER VILLA: Pete Akras?
MR GRIM: No somebody else. He was asking me what I was
doing and you know I sent them back and now I think the
Page 22 - August 15, 1991
Public Hearing - Donald & Jeanne Grim
Southold Z.B.A.
MR GRIM, cont'd: volume of cars is going to be up like you
say and the fluids are going to up, so we are going try to up
the volume.
MEMBER VILLA: You are going to comply to all their double
tanks, and their double piping.
MR GRIM: I think if we make a shed out of concrete outside
and then put one of North Forks containers inside of it we've
got a dual purpose. I think you are allowed...
MEMBER VILLA: It depends on how they look at it because a
lot of the piping they want double wall piping.
MR GRIM: Okay if this is what they want...
MEMBER VILLA: But you are in the process.
MR GRIM: Well yeah, you know, whatever they want.
MEMBER VILLA: I just didn't want it to happen after the
fact.
MR GRIM: No, okay, thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHI{INGER: Does anybody else have any other
questions. Okay. We'll see what develops throughout the
hearing. We thank you.
MR GRIM: Thank you very much.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Is there anybody else who would like to
speak in favor of this application? Anybody like to speak
against the application? Seeing no hands I make a motion
closing the hearing reserving decision until later.
Ail in Favor - AYE.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
September 5, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re: Site Plan for ~
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM 9 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
This is to ask you to comply with our environmental
consultant's recommendation that you complete Part III of the
Long Environmental Assessment form.
A copy of the consultant's letter is enclosed for your
convenience, along with a copy of Part III of the Assessment
form.
This office is sending a copy of the last revised site plan
to the consultant to see if it answers their questions.
If you have questions about the enclosed material, please
speak with Valerie Scopaz of this office.
cc:
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /' ' ~
Chairman
Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals //
Charles Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Reply to Memorandum
TO: Planning Board Office
FROM: Board of Appeals
DATE: August 23, 1991
SUBJECT: ~Donald and Jeanne Grim -
SEQRA Coordination
1000-83-3-4.5
We are in receipt of your coordination letter under SEQRA and
wish to confirm for the record that although we have no
objection to your assuming lead agency status, we wish to make
the following recommendations:
A. Review of visual resources:
Exterior stacking of vehicles, materials, recyclables, etc.
Are they satisfactorily designed with staggered buffers or
physically blended with surroundings? At what heights will each
stack be permitted? Will there be areas above 13.5 ft. in
height, exclusive of enclosed buildings, for storage or
stacking? How will they be buffered to mitigate visual impacts?
B. Review of possible noise impacts:
Periods of times at which higher degree of noise level may
be an impact, with machinery, vehicles, and/or other industrial
operations.
~onditions imposed with respect to the issuance, by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold, of a Conditioned Nec~ative Declaration with respect to the application of
Jeanne Grim for a Rec¥clin~ and Salvage Facility:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. Tl~ere shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OFSOUTHOLD
SCOTI' L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
/3/ 19~/
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: ~ ~' o~-- % -
Requested Action:
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
(~) Unlisted
Contact Person:
(516)-765-1938
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental
impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of
the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you
have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
(~/) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other. ( See comments below).
Comments:
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely,
CC:
Board of Appeals
Building~Department
Southold Town Board
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
S.C. Dopt of P~,bl~ Work~
U.S. Az~.~' Ccrp ~ ~-~A
* Maps are enclosed for your.~eview
Coordinating agencies
Bennett Orlowski,
Chairman
Jr.
CONDITIONED
Ne§ative Declaration
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Lead Agency:
Address:
Southold Town Board
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Project #(if any)
Date: March 1, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law #_3 - 1978 if any) of the imple-
menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ-
mental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a
significant effect on the environment, provided the conditions are met.
Title of Action:
SEQR Status:
Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road recycling Corp.
Authorization of Recycling and Salvage Facility
SCTM#1000-083-3-4.5
Type I []
Unlisted []
Description of Action: The proposed recycling and salvage facility site is
presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose
of excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices.
This use is being conducted in accordance with a Planning Board
approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals authorization. In
addition, the facility is already approved for a wood chipping operation.
The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid
removal, crushing or cutting) and shipping off the site.
Location: (include the name of the county and town. A location map of appropriate scale is also
recommended) 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York.
(Atlach addilional pages as needed)
SEQR Conditional Negative Declaration
Page 2
Reasons Supporting This Determination: Recognizing that the proposed use is
compatible with the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal,
and that mitigation measures are available to minimize potential environmental
effects, provided the following conditions are adhered to:
(See attached list of conditions (1) through (9)
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No.:
Judith T. Terry, $outhold Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
(516) 765-1801
N.Y. 11971
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation. 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York
12233-0001
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation -Region [.
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi-
pally located - Supervisor Scott L. Harris.
Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency.
Applicant (if any) Jeanne M. Grim
Ali other involved agencies (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Southo[d Town Board of Appeals
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
NOTE: Negative Declarations for Unlisted Actions need not be filed with DE(: or any other agency (see 617.7(a)).
Conditions imposed with respect to the issuance, by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold, of a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of
Jeanne Grim for a Recycling and Salvac~e Facility:
(I) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOED
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Tgwn Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
December 10, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re:
Site Plan for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM 9 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on December 9, 1991.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board,
acting pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act,
hereby takes lead agent status; makes a determination of
non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration for this
proposal to construct a recycling and salvage facility.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board hereby
grants site plan approval upon fufillment of the following
condition:
Submission of five revised site plans which incorporate
the following:
A ten (10) foot wide vegetative buffer around the
entire perimeter of the side and rear portions of the
property. The landscape plan for the buffer shall
show a double row of staggered evergreen trees. A mix
of the following species shall be used: white pines,
white cedar, red spruce and arborvitae. The trees
shall be between 8 and 10 feet in height and shall be
planted twenty (20) feet apart (on center); except
that trees between the southern edge of the car
storage area and the southernmost end of the property
may be between 5 and 6 feet in height.
2. The following notations:
A. The landscaping in the front yard shall be of
sufficient depth and height to block the view of the
equipment from the road and the neighboring
residences, subject to a one year review by this
Board.
B. In the interest of mitigating noise,
buffering shall be installed, as needed,
one year review by this Board.
additional
subject to a
C. A means of providing water spray shall be
maintained on the site at all times for the purpose of
dust control on the site and by the crushing equipment.
D. The site shall be operated in accordance with all
conditions of approval as they were set forth by the
Town Board in its resolutions of approval which were
adopted on April 9, 1991, November 26, 1991 and
December 10, 1991) and by the Zoning Board of Appeals
in its decision of September 12, 1991 on Appeal No.
4041. (The Liber and Page numbers of all required
Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions shall be
noted on the site plan.)
3. An approval stamp by the Suffolk County Department of
Health and a permit from the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation for each of all proposed
activities on the site.
A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your
records.
Please contact Valerie Scopaz if you have any questions
about these resolutions.
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Encl.
cc: /Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
w Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OFSOUTHOLD
SCOT'FL. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
December 10, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The $outhold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has
determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action : Oregon Road Recycling Corporation
SCTM g: 1000-83-3-4.5
Location:
South side of Oregon Road, about 572'east of
Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York
SEQR Status: Type I ( )
Unlisted (x)
Conditioned Negative Declaration:
Yes ( )
No (x)
Description of Action:
To construct a recycling and salvage facility for the
purpose of crushing and recycling concrete, asphalt and
cars. The proposed uses would be added to the existing
uses which are associated with the company's activities:
excavation and drainage, soil screening, wood chipping and
the offices.
Page 2
Planning Board
December 10, 1991
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
There has been no correspondence received from the
Department of Health Services. Therefore, it is assumed
that there are no comments or objections from that agency.
However, the Corporation will be subject to review by this
agency in order to obtain necessary permits for the
draining, storage and hauling of automobile fluids.
There has neen no correspondence received from the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Stony
Brook office. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no
comments or objections from that agency.
The Southold Town Board conducted its own environmental
review relative to the application for a permit for a
Recycling and Salvage Facility. The application before the
Planning Board for site plan approval conforms to the terms
of the Conditional Negative Declaration that was issued on
March 1, 1991, and the conditions of the Town Board's
resolutions of approval of April 9, 1991 and November 26,
1991 (copies enclosed).
The Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals issued a
decision on the Special Exception in accordance with the
Town Board's Conditional'Negative Declaration. (A copy of
the Zoning Board's decision is enclosed, also.)
The Planning Board finds that the environmental impacts of
the proposed expansion of the existing uses of the site to
include a Recycling and Salvage Facility will be mitigated
satisfactorily by the implementation of the conditions set
forth in the March 1, 1991, conditional Negative
Declaration of the Town Board, the conditions of the Town
Baord's permit (which were set forth on April 9, 1991 and
November 26, 1991) and the conditions of the Special
Page 3
Planning Board
December 10, 1991
Exception issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals (No. 4142)
for the reasons set forth herein:
1. The subject property is presently used for industrial
purposes including excavation and drainage~contracting,
wood chipping and material screening. The subject site is
in proximity to (and down gradient of) the Southold Town
Landfill and is zoned, used and located in a predominately
industrial area.
2. The project's operation and impacts have been reviewed
in detail through the preparation of a Full Environmental
Assessment Form Part III which was submitted in connection
with the application.
3. The proposed use is consistent with zoning and land
use in the vicinity of the site.
4. The proposed use has Town Board authorization in
accordance with Chapter 48-1 of the Town Code, and with the
Zoning Board of Appeals' authorization in accordance with
Chapter 100 of the Zoning Code. The use is conditionally
exempt from NYSECL 6 NYCRR PArt 360. The site must be
operated in accordance with Chapter 48-1 of the Town Code,
the Zoning Board of Appeals' decision on Appeal No. 4142,
the Part 360 conditional exemption of the New York State
law, and the conditions imposed by the Planning Board's
conditions of approval of December 9, 1991.
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Valerie Scopaz
Address:
Southold Town Planning Board
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, N.Y. 11952
Telephone:
(516) 765-1938
Encls.
cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Commissioner Jorling, NYSDEC, Albany
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
Applicant
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 9, 1991:
WHEREAS, Jeanne M. Grim, President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp.,. by
application dated December 9, 1990, applied to the Southold Town Board for a
Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit at her property located at 11910 Oregon Road,
Cutchogue; and
WHEREAS, a Long Environmental Assessment Form was submitted with the
application, and reviewed by Cramer, Voorhis & Associates on behalf of the Town
Board; and
WHEREAS, after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a Conditioned Negative
Declaration with respect to said application, pursuant to Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
6NYCRR Part 617.6(h), and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Board found that the proposed use is compatible with
the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal, and mitigation measures
are available to minimize potential environmental effects which will be addressed in
the conditions of granting this permit; and
WHEREAS, the proposed recycling and salvage facility site is presently in active use
by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., being used for the purpose of excavation and
drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices, which use is being conducted in
accordance with a Planning Board approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization, as well as an approved wood chipping operation; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal,
crushing or cutting) and shipping off site; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants Jeanne M.
Grim,. President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp, a Recycling and Salvage Facility
Permit as requested, for the facility to be located at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue,
New York, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the
site plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, -and or need' for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance,
in accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at
any one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance
with these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as
necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in
certain heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility,
provided it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and
Suffolk County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
com~iance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(See attached for Condition No. 10 adopted on November 26, 1991.)
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
April 12, 1991
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A RECULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 26, 1991:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends
their Resolution No. 23, adopted on April 9, 1991, by adding one further
condition: "(10) By the filing and compliance of the Covenants and
Restrictions this Recycling and Salvage Facility shall be deemeda permanent
use on the subject premises."
Judith T. Terry (~
Southold Town Clerk
November 27. 1991
617.21 SEQi
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAE ASSESSMENT FORM.
Purpose: The fuji EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an ordedy manner, whether a projec
~yr, action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not atways easy to answer. Frequent
there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically ~xpert in environmenta
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin:
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinaticr
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introc~uction of information to fit a project or action
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and ~
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide~
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 Js identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th~
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 I-IPart 3
Upon review of the information ~ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
. effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
NAme of Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Oii;icer
Si-~'nature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
Print or I'ype Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
~.RT 1--PROJECT INFORMA
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant erie,
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to thes'e questions will be considerr
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invoK
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speci~
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
LOCATION OF A~CTION (Include Stre~ress, Municipality,a~ County)
NAME OP APPL'OA"T,SPON '
NAME O~F OWNER (If ciJffere~
ADDRESS
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
( o "7- -
I
STAT E ~_/ ZIP CODE
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
CITY/PO
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, bothj~veloped and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: i-lUrban [~lndustrial I-ICommercial (-1Residential (suburban)
I-1Forest I-1Agriculture [-IOther
2. Total acreage of project area: */, O"" acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres
Forested
acres
I'-IRural (non-farrr
AFTER COMPLETION
Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill}
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces'
Other (indicate type) ~'~- (z~:~p-ro-,-~'~ '5,~ t-~{~<~
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ~ct~)c'j ~/
a'. Soil drainage: 12~ell drained I oC~ % of site
~Poorly drained % of site
~Moderately well drained
% of site
b. If any agricultural land is involveid! how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY
Land Classification System? r,/l~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E3Yes
a. What is depth to bedrock? [in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of prop~project sit~_with slopes: ~/00-10% % []10-15 %
[]15% or greater .%
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or ~oin a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? r-lyes
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes ~No
8. What is the depth of the water table? '7'o - ~:'5'"~i f~)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I'qYes ~No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes [~o
11. Does project site.~tain' any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
f-lyes L~No According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any uni~?r unusual land forms on the project site? (i/e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[]Yes u~o Describe
13. Is the project site_~r~sently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
[]Yes IdNo If yes, explain
14. Does the present si~ include scenic views known to be important to the community;~
[]Yes [~No '
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: /'~//'~ -
a. -Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ,"-///~L -- /',,] ~-~-
a. Name b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served by'~xisting p_ublic utilities? ~Yes [-1No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~es []No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []:]Yes [~No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural/district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? [:]Yes [~No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous,,~o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [l-lyes E~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes {~o
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or c,o~roll?~.d_~by project sponsor
b. Project acreage to be developed: '~ %
· / acres initially; ,~
c. Project acreage to remain undej~,,!oped _/~/~)nc~. acres·
d. Length of project, io miles: /~,//~L (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing /5 -; proposed .
. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N"/.,~
One Family Two Family
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure '~-' height; ~O width;
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ,:~'D,
3
acres,
acres ultimately.
(upon completion of project)?
Multiple Family Condominium
_ length.
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~Yes ".~o-- . ~N/A '
a. If yes, for what intend~Z purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l-lyes
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes []~o
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres.
5. Will any ._~est (over 100 years 0Id) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
mature
h4No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction (~) months, (including demolition).
a. Total number of phases anticipated _. (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I . month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? []-lyes /
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction /~/~/- ; after project
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project, /~/~- .
11.
tons/cubic yards
year, (including demolition).
year.
K1No
is comp ere _,~,/~
Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r-lYes If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? i-lYes
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent Will be discharged .
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [l-lYes {~o Type
· 14. Will surface area of an e~isting Water body increase or decrease by proposal? [Yes
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood paint []Yes (~o/
16. Will the project generate solid waste? E]Yes
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes E]No
c. If yes, give name '; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [~es [No
e. If Yes, explain 0,1'~ ~,'~,, 4~,~[o vC~c/~s ~i~11 l'~L bi~'~c~ ~ ~c~¢ 4ff~, '~
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?' []Yes [~o
18.
19.
20.
21.
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. IJ yes, what is the anticipated site life? . years.
Will project use herbicides or pesticides? q-]Yes [~o
Will project routinely I~roduce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes ~o
Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambien.~/poise levels? F1yes
Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes llano
If ~'es , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity __ ~'~ gallons/minute.~y~ v'~c~ L~-)~'~t I
23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~" gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fund ng? []Yes E]No /LJ~L ~--/ L~._~~
If Yes, explain
4
25. Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board ~es []No
City, Town, Village Planning Board fl-lYes [~o
City, Town Zoning Board fl-lYes
City, County Health Department i-lyes {~o
Other Local Agencies I-lYes
Other Regional Agencies . . U1Yes
State Agencies ~es [~'No
Federal Agencies i-lYes [~o
e~ Submittal
Type Dale
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~]Yes
If Yes, indicate decision required:
I-lzoning amendment Clzoning variance Ulspecial use permit I-Isubdivision E]site plan
I~new/revision of master plan r-lresource management plan I-Iother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L~..~_.o
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? v"e-~?~Ci~
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~ I-IN
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is .~he proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V, mile? [~es r-IN
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how m/~ny lots are proposed? ~'-J/A
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
/
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? IDYes
11. Will the proposed actio/~ create Fdemand for any community provided services (recreation, education, policc
fire protection)? [~'es E-lNo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [~es
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes [-INc
. a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes ~No.
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverst
impacts associated with your proposal, please dis'cuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sp~, or Nam . ~ ~(~--
If the actionOs in the Coastal ~rea, and you
with this assessmenL
Date J-~/ II }~0
are a stale agency, COmplete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
5
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Site Plan for Grim Recycling Center and
Oak Street Trucking Co.
Oregon Road, Cutchoque
SCTM ~ 1000-83-3-~.5
Appeal No. ? f
DATE: August 1, 1991
This is in reply to your request for comments on the
proposed site plan for the Grim Recycling Center.
It would be inappr~iate for the Planning Board to make
such comments at this ti~e because we have not started the
environmental review of the project.
The Planning Board will start the coordinated environmental
review procedure at its next meeting on August 12, 1991. As an
involved agency, your Board will receive notification.
This procedure is in accordance with our informal agreement
to coordinate the environmental and site reviews of site plan
applications where approvals are required by both Boards. The
Planning Board has found that this procedure is working well on
the other pending applications that we are reviewing jointly.
Therefore, I would like to continue to follow that procedure
with this application.
Also, the Town Board placed specific conditions on their
approval of a permit for recycling and salvage facility, one of
which is that the Planning Board conduct a separate
environmental review. A copy of their decision is attached for
your convenience.
If further questions should arise, please bring them to my
attention.
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Board
Board of Appeals
July 18, 1991
Site Plan Coordination - Donald Grim
Oregon Road at Cutchogue
Our office has received the above-noted application for Special
Exception approvals related to the proposed rec¥1cing and
salvage yard uses in conjunction with Oak Street Trucking uses,
pursuant to the site plan amended July 2, 1991, which we
understand is on file and pending with your office.
A request is made at this time under the site plan regulations
in order that you may be provided with notice to respond within
the next sixty (60) days as required by Section 100-254B(3).
Please communicate those areas which you feel may significantly
affect those site plan elements applicable in the new project.
In the event your comments are received by Friday, August 2,
1991, the legal notice would be sent for publication in the
local newspapers on Monday, August 5, 1991.
Should additional information be necessary, please contact Linda
Kowalski directly.
Attachment
DONALD J. GRIM
P.O. BOX 500
CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. 11955
MAY 21, 1991
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
RE: S/C TAX MAP #: 1000-85-3-4.5
APPEAL NO. 5595
DEAR SIR OR MADAM:
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD HAS GIVEN ME AN APPROVAL FOR A RECYCLING
AND SALVAGE FACILITY KNOWN AS OREGON RD. RECYCLING CORP.
ORIGINALLY THE Z.B.A. HAD SET RESTRICTIONS FOR OUR ORIGINAL
SITE PLAN FOR OAK ST. TRUCKING INC. WHICH I WOULD LIKE TO
HAVE AMENDED, IF POSSIBLE.
THE AMENDMENTS I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE CONCERN THE ABOVE
MENTIONED APPEAL, PAGE 2, FACT #5 AND CONDITION #5.
I WOULD LIKE TO OPERATE MY RECYCLING FACILITY ON THE SAME
PARCEL AND USE THE OFFICE FOR BOTH BUSINESSES.
WE ARE NOW WORKING WITH THE PLANNING BOARD FOR AN AMENDED
SITE PLAN.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS MATTER, YOU MAY
CONTACT ME AT 754-7248 (DAY) OR 754-7078 (EVENING).
THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
I REMAIN,
DONALD J. GRIM
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio. Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney
Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman
May 31, 1991
Recycling and Salvage Yard Facilities - Donald Grim
Inquiry of May 21, 1991
We have received a request from Donald Grim inquiring as to
whether or not a Special Exception application is necessary for
the proposed recycling and salvage yard, to be used in
conjunction with the current Special Exception for the Oak
Street Trucking and storage yard activities.
Under the current Special Exception use for the Oak St. Trucking
Business, Condition $3 of the ZBA decision rendered March 5,
1987, provides that "the building be used ...incidental to the
existing principal business operation .... "
The Zoning Board Members have requested your legal opinion for
the above project. Attached is a copy of the proposed site plan
map. The premises is located in the LI Zone District, and a
copy of the LI zone provisions are also attached for your
convenience.
GG:lk
Attachment
§ lO0-1al
(9)
(lO)
(11)
SOUTHOLD CODE § 100_140
Central heating and power plants accessory to the
principal use and the service of all structures on the
premises.
Maintenance and utility shops incidental to the principal
use.
Off-street parking and loading. Said areas sha}l not be
nearer than fifty (50) feet te any lot line or street and, if
generally adjacent to any street or any residence district,
shall be suitably screened by a landscaped strip of at ]east
ten (I0) feet in width.
§ 100-132. Bulk, area and parking regulations.
No building or premises shall be used and no building or part
thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/
Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms to the Bulk
Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this
chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such
regulations were set forth herein in full.2?
ARTICLE XIV2s
Light Industrial (LI) District
[Added 1-10-89 by L.L. No. 1-1989]
§ 100-140. Purpose.
The purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) District is to provide an
opportunity for business and industrial uses on smaller lots than
would be appropriate for the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned
Office Park District.
~'s N~'~: The Bulk Sehedule is included at file end of this ehapler, and the Parking
and Loading. Sehedule~ are in ~ 100-191 and 100-192.
Z8 Edilor's Nole: Former Ar~. Xl¥. Administration and Enforcement,
Arc XXVIII 1-10~89 by iLL. No. 1-1989. was renumbered as
§ 100-141 ZONING § 100-141
§ 100-141. Use regulations.
In the LI District, no building or premises shall be used and no
building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is
arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any
purpose except the following:.
A. [Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The
following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses
permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
(1) Any permitted uses set forth in and as regu]at~l by
§ I00-31A(2) and (3) of the Agricultural-Conservation
District.
(2) Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-131A(2) to (5) of the Light Industrial Park/Planned
Office Park District.
· B. Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals.
The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the
Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
(1) Any special exception use set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-131B(1) to (11) of the Light Industrial Park/
Planned Office Park District.
(2) Bed-and-breakfast uses as set forth in and as regulated
by § 100-31B(15), provided that no site plan approval is
required.
(3) Wineries. [Added 8-1-89 by L.L. No. 15.1989]
C. [Amended 5.9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The
following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for
residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by
Article XX, are subject to site plan review:
(1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily
incidental to any permitted or special 'exception use and
not involving a separate business.
10095 ~o- zs- ss
10094
§ 100-122 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-131
§ 100-122. Bulk, area and parking regulations.
No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be
erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the
Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into
this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such
regulations were set forth herein in full?
ARTICLE XIII
Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park
(LIO) District
[Added 1-10-89 by L.L. No. 1-198926]
§ 100-130. Purpose.
The purpose of the Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park
(LIO) District is to provide opportunity for the location of business
and professional offices, research facilities, industrial uses and similar
activities in an open, campus-like setting in areas which are not
appropriate for commercial activity or low-density residential
development. In this area, such uses can be established in an
attractive environment and serve both as a means of preserving the
open qualities of an area and providing an area adjacent to hamlet
areas where such uses can be appropriately developed with suitable
protection for ground- and surface waters. All uses must conform to
Suffolk County Health Department standards.
§ 100-131. Use regulations.
In the LIO District, no building' or premises shalt be used and no
building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is
arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any
purpose except the following:
~ Edih~r's Not~: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking
and Loading Schedules are n ,~ 100-191 and 100-192.
26 Edilor's Note: This local law also repealed former Art. XlI[, Site Plan Approval as
amended. For current provisions, see Art, XXV, S}te Plan Approval.
§ 100-131 ZONING § 100-131
A. [Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The
following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses
permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
(1)
Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-31A(2) and (3) of the Agricultural-Conservation
DistricL
(2) Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-10IA(3) to (5) of the General Business District.
(3)
Office buildings for businesses, governmental and
professional uses, including administrative training, data
processing, publication, financial and sales offices.
(4) Telephone exchanges.
(5)
Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the
Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire
districts.
B. Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals.
The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the
Boat'd of Appeals as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan
approval by the Planning Board:
(1)
Any special exception use set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-101B(5), (7) and (10) of the General Business
District.
(2)
Light industrial uses involving the fabrication, reshaping,
reworking, assembly or combining of products from
previously prepared materials and which do not involve
the synthesis of chemical or chemical products other than
for pharmaceutical or research purposes or the process-
lng of any raw materials except agricultural raw
materials. Such uses may include industrial operations
such as electronic, machine parts and small component
assembly, as opposed to heavy industrial operations such
as automobile assembly or milling activities, and will be
subject to the following conditions:
10091 7-25-89
7 ,~ ~,
§ 100-131.
SOUTHOLD CODE
§ 100-131
(al No such process or operation shall involve the
handling, storage or discharge of explosives or
permit upon the premises any virus or other type of
infectious organisms identified with diseases of
animals or humans.
(b) No offensive noises, gases, fumes, smoke, odors, dust,
effluent or vibrations shall emanate from such use
and no waste products shall be discharged therefrom
of a character to create a nuisance or to be injurious
to health or to negatively impact groundwater.
(c) Such processes shall involve the use of only oil, gas or
electricity for fuel
(3) Conference facilities, subject to the following conditions:
(al Where rooms are provided for conference attendees,
said rooms are permitted as set forth and regulated
, by § 100~61B(4) of the Resort Residential (RR)
District. [Amended 5-23-89 by L.L. No. 7-1989]
(4) Public utility structures and uses.
(5) Printing or publishing plants.
(6) Truck or bus terminals (garages, parking faci]itles,
loading docks, etc.).
(7) Food processing and packaging plants, not including fish
procgssing plants.
(8) Wbelesale and retail sales and repair of beats and marine
items.
(9) Boat building, boat serv/cing and beat storage facilities.
(10) Restaurants.
(11) Sauerkraut manufacturing plants.
(12) Basic Utility Stage II airport, subject to the following
conditions:
10092
§ 100-131 ZONING § 100-131
{al Minimum parcel size shall be one hundred (100)
(13) Bed-and-breakfast uses as sot forth in and as regulated
by § 100-31B(15), provided that no site plan approval is
required.
(14) Wineries. [Added 8-1-89 by L.L. No. 15-1989]
C. [Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The
following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for
residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by
Article XX, are subject to site plan review:
(1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily
incidental to any permitted or special exception uso and
not involving a separate business.
(2) Wall signs as set forth in and regulated by § 100-
81C(2)(b) of the Limited Business District, limited to a
maximum size of thirty (30) square foot in ares_
(3) Freestanding or ground signs as set forth in and
regulated by § 100-101C(3) of the General Business
District.
(4) Fully enclosed storage facilities incidental to the principal
USe.
(5) Open storage as set forth in and regulated by § 100-
101C(4) of the General Business District.
(6) Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities for the exclusive
use of executives and employees of the principal use and
their families.
(7) In-service training schools for employees of the principal
(8) Private garages for the storage and service of motor
vehicles owned by the owner of the prindipal use or the
executives or employees thereof, or visitors thereto,
including the sale of them, but not to the public generally
of gasoline, oil and minor accessories.
10093 ~o- 2~- s~
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN El-lAD- STATE ROAD 25 ~r'IUTH[3LD. L.I.. N.Y. 11¢J71
TELEPHONE (516) 765-3809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
November 24, 1986
Mr. Donald j. Grim
475 Jern_ick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appeal No. 3491 (Special Exception
Your Letter Received 11/3/86
Dear Mr. Grim:
This letter will confirm that the Board of Appeals has
reviewed your 'letter dated November 2, 1986 wi.~.h attached
Site Plan showing th~' evergreens and stockade gate screening
(added 10/28/86) prepared by Sealand Surveying & Engineering,
P.C.
The Board has accepted the site plan as to meeting the
condition of the Board's June 25, 1986 decision; however, it
should be understood that the "area for stockpiling materials,
i.e. gravel, sand, etc." as depicted on the site plan shall
not be expanded outside the 160' deep by 230'' wide area
(unless a new application is filed and reconsidered).
A copy of thi§ letter is being furnished to the Town
Planning Board for their file.
Yours very truly,
CC:
Planning Board
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
By Linda Kowalski
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN 'BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 9, 1991:
WHEREAS, Jeanne M. Grim, President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp., by
application dated December 9, 1990, applied to the Southold Town Board for a
Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit at her property located at 11910 Oregon Road,
Cutchogue; and
WHEREAS, a Long Environmental Assessment Form was submitted with the
application, and reviewed by Cramer, Voorhis & Associates on behalf of the Town
Board; and
WHEREAS,
Declaration
after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a Conditioned .Negative
with respect to said application, pursuant to Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
6NYCRR Part 617.6(h), and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Board found that the proposed use is compatible with
the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal, and mitigation measures
are available to minimize potential environmental effects which will be addressed in
the conditions of granting this permit; and
WHEREAS, the proposed recycling and salvage facility site is presently in active use
by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., being used for the purpose of excavation and
drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices, which use is being conducted in
accordance with a Planning Board approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization, as well as an approved wood chipping operation; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal,
crushing or cutting) and shipping off site; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants Jeanne M.
Grim, President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp, a Recycling and Salvage Facility
Permit as requested, for the facility to be located at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue,
New York, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the
site plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance,
in accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at
any one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance
with these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as
necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in
certain heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility,
provided it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and
Suffolk County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
Southold Town Clerk
April 12, 1991
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P,O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) '765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 26, 1991:
RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State
Environmental Quality Review Act, and 6NYCRR Part 617.6(h), and Chapter 44 of
the code of the Town of Southold, the town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
issues a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of Jeanne
Grim for a recycling facility at Oregon Road, Cutchogue, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town (~fficials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant, shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
Judith T. Terry ~'
Southold Town Clerk
March 1, 1991
CONDITIONED
Negative Declaration
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Lead Agency:
Address:
Southold Town Board
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
SoUthold, New York 11971
Project # (if any)
Date: March 1, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law #_3 - 1978 if any) of the imple-
menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ-
mental Conservation Law. ~
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a
significant effect on the environment, provided the conditions are met.
Title of Action:
SEQR Status:
Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road recycling Corp.
Authorization of Recycling and Salvage Facility
SCTM#1000-083-3-4.5
Type I []
Unlisted []
Description of Action: The proposed recycling and salvage facility site is
presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose
of excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices.
This use is being conducted in accordance with a Planning Board
approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals authorization. In
addition, the facility is already approved for a wood chipping operation.
The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid
removal, crushing or cutting) and shipping off the site.
Location: (Include the name of the county and town. A location map of appropriate scale is also
recommended) 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York.
(Attach additional pages as needed)
Conditions imposed with respect to the issuance, by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold, of a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of
Jeanne Grim for a Recycling and Salvage Facility:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
SEQR Conditional Negative Declaration
Page2
Reasons Supporting This Determinat'ion: Recognizing that the proposed use is
compatible with the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal,
and that mitigation measures are available to minimize potential environmental
effects, provided the following conditions are adhered to:
(See attached list of conditions (1} through (9)
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk
Address: Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
Phone No.: (516) 765-1801
N.Y. 11971
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York
12233-0001
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation -Region I,
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi-
pally located - Supervisor Scott L. Harris.
Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency.
Applicant (if any) Jeanne M. Grim
All other involved agencies (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NOTE: Negative Declarations for Unlisted Actions need not be filed with DEC or any other agency (see 617.7(a)).
14-16-2 (2/87)-- 7c
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM.
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer, Frequent-
~ action may be significant. The subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
there are aspects of a project that are
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically ffxpert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in ~one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1= Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and ~
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
SEQR
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisfed Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3
Upon review of the information ~ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
[] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
[] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
[] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* ^ Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
N,~me of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Preparer (1~ different from responsible officer)
Date
PAPJ 1--~ROJECT INFOR ION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to thes'e questions will be considere(
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv,
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif'
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
d% e q o ,,.,
LOCATION OF A~TION (Include Stre~ress, MunlclpalUy~ County
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
NAME OF OWNER (If dlfferenth I
I
ADDRES_S_~
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable '
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, bothjs[eveloped and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: I-IUrban l~lndustrial F'lCommercial i'-IResidential (suburban)
l-lForest i'-IAgriculture I-IOther
2. Total acreage of project area: "'/' O~' acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres " acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces' acres acres
Other (Indicate type) -~- di~3~-fo-v-~'~ '~l~' p[a~ acres acres
.3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ~.~&v3~ .-/ I._~L,C't~'~
a'. Soil drainage: [~VeH drained I OC~ % of site [:]Moderately well drained % of site
[~Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY
Land Classification System? /'///~ acres. (See 1 of soil are
NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [:]Yes I~o
a. What is depth to bedrock? _ (in feet)
f"lRural (non-farrr
2
~' D15% or greater %
6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, orcoco~"'ain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? I-Wes
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? r-lYes
8.
What
is the depth of the water table? -,~ (i fn~'~
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes (~o
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes [~"o
11. Does project site_~tain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
~Yes I~No According to
Identify each species
12, Are there any uni[~o r unusual land forms on the project site? (ile., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
nYes Describe
13, Is the project site~sently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
D-lYes [~No If yes, explain
14. Does the present si.Ce include scenic views known to be important to the community?
D-lYes [~No
'15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area:
a..Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name
17. Is the site served by'~x sting p_ubhc utilities? ~Yes r-iNo
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
b. Size (In acres)
I'-I N o
l-lYes ~o
18. Is the site located in an agricultural~Jistrict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA,
Section 303 and 304? OYes [2]No
19, Is the site located in or substantially contiguous./~o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []=]Yes [~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? C1Yes ~o
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fil( in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or c.o~roJle_~_~y project sponsor ~ acres.
b. Project acreage to be deveJoped: ~ ~ / acres initially; '~ -~-- acres uliimately.
c. Project acreage to remain unde)~!oped ~./a r~_.. acres. '
d. Length of project, in miles: /"~,/'q' (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing /~7 ; proposed
. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~"~---' height; .. ~,/C3 width; ~-[-) length.
j. Linear feet of fro.ntage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? .~(,2.,,~t.
3
Condominium
'2. H~w much natural materi e...rock, earth etc wdl /
· .) W,~,,be rem,~d from the site? tons/cubic Yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E3Yes [~o
a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation~ ~Yes
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres.
5, Will any mature~est (over 100 years 0Id) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this pr0ject?
~Yes ~No '
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of ~onstruction ~ m9nths, (including demolition).
7. 1' multi-phased: ~/~ -
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase ~ month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase, month
d. Is phase ~ functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes ~No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~Yes/
~0. Number of iobs eliminated by this project
~. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~Yes ~ If yes, explain
year· (including demolition).
year.
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? l-lyes
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? i-lYes ~o Type
· 14. Will surface area of an existing Water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-Iyes
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [-]Yes [~o
16. Will the project generate solid waste? i-lyes
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facH ty be used? i'-lYes [:]No
c. If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?'
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
h. I~ yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-Wes
r-lYes [~o
tons/month.
years.
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? l-lYes ~o
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the Ioca! ambien~,~oise levels? E]Yes
21; Will project result in an increase in energy usel I--lyes I~No
If ~'es , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is fromwells, indicate pumping capacity. "~ ga ons/minute.'~V~v'P4.,~ L'~d'Jll
23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~'"' gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes F:INo/,J~,/- ~--/~~~
if Yes, explain
· - ~.2.~. 'Approvals Required:
City, Town, Village Board ~es t-lNo
City, Town, Village Planning Board I-lYes ~o
City, Town Zoning Board I-IYes [~1~o
City, County Health Department l/Yes [~o
Other Local Agencies ii-lYes [~4o
Other Regional Agencies I-lYes
State Agencies ~es~ C~No
Federal Agencies ii-lYes ~'o
Type
Submittal
Date
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? f-lYes
If Yes, indicate decision required:
l-lzoning amendment l-lzoning variance [-Ispecial use permit F'lsubdivision [-Isite plan
~new/revision of master plan f-lresource management plan [-]other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? [-a..T-.~
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Y"~C/~-~
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~es linc
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is .~he proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a% mile? [~es linc
cj. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how rn/~ny lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~////f
/
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the forn~ation of sewer or water d strict, s? i-lyes ~Nc
11. Will the proposed a~ create p demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police,
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I~es
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present evels? I-lYes ~/No
· a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I~yes [JNO -
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adversc
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate of
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sp~, or Nam~ ~
Signature ~ 114
If the actio4s in the Coastal ./~r'~ea, and you are a state agency'
with this assessment.
5
Date
Title .'-C'~dS t~-,._W-
Complele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
]SS:
~OU#TY O~ ~UFFOLK)
.10 ~un~, being (July ~orn, ~l ~t he/~ b Pdnol~l
Cl~rk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, I We~kly
publbhed at Mattltuc~ In the Town of ~uthoM, ~un~ of
Suffolk and State of New Y~ and t~t ~e Notre
~.ld Newspaper once eaoh week for /
successively, commencing on the ~
~ / Pr~lpal Clerk
.%
~O'f ICE OF HEAR[N~
NOTICE [$ HEREBY GIVEN,
po~uto~ ~o Secdo~ 267 of thc Town
Legal...
Leg ab. ~xl s~ge
~ excess of t~ 20% lot
R~ 7~e ~sm~ ~ of ~
cfly: 41~ Fish~in*t Beach ~d.
ti=,. ~c. (~931); ~u~y Tax
7:5~ p.m. AppI. ~o. 4048 --
~NA~ AND ~EAN~E GRIM.~
Amendment to ~ci~
ap, p~ov~,l of · thizd dwcRi,ng
conjunction ~ multiple
Ro*d. Mattiluct. NY; County T~
8:~ pm. A~.
~O b~S. IOSEPI[ HAZY,
cisl Excc~io~ to
nance. Article IX, Section ]O0-
9tB~4) to ~a ~ ~ tCCel-
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN, pursuant to Section
267 of the Town Law and the
Code of the Town of Southold,
the following matters will be
held for public hearings before
the SOUTHOLD TOWN
BOARD OF APPEALS at the
Southold Town Hall, 53095
Main Road, Southold, NY
11971, on THURSDAY, AUG-
UST 15, 1991, commencing at
the times specified below:
7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 4043--
JOHN H. AND GAYLE BIRK-
MIER. Special Exception to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III,
Section 100-30B(16) for permis-
sion to establish "Bed and
Breakfast Use~' an owner-oc-
cupied building, other than a
hotel, where lodging and break-
fa~t is provided for not more
than six casual, transient !
roomers, and renting of not~
more than three rooms on the
second-floor of the existing
dwelling structure. Location:
48850 Main Road, Southold,
NY; County Tax Map No. 1000-
70-07-10.
7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 4044--
WILLIAM, AILEEN AND
jOHhgPARROTT. Variance to ~
the Zoning Ordinance, Article
XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and
Article XXIV, Section 100-244B,
for approval of deck construc-
tion at less than ~/5 feet from the
bulkhead and in excess of the~
20% lot coverage limitation for
all structures. The subject par- ~
cci is substandard in size and is
located in the R-40 Zone Dis-i
trict. Location of Property: 2435
Cedar Lane, East Marion;
County Tax Map No. 1000-37-
4-9.
7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4045--c0
GLORIA LOWERY. Variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article
XXIII, Section 100-239.4(B) for
permission .to construct open-
deck addition to dwelling struc-
ture with a setback at less than
75 feet from the bulkhead. The
subject parcel is substandard in
size and is located in the R-40
Zone District. Location of Pro-
perty: 650 Oak Avenue,
Southold, NY; County Tax Map
No. 1000-77-1-2. Also referred to
as Lot Nos. 285, 284, 283, 282,
and part of 281 on the Map of
Goose Bay Estates (1934).
7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4045--
MR. AND MRS. THOMAS M.
McKEON. Variance to the Zon-
ing Ordinance, Article XXIV,
Section 100-244B for permission
to construct addition with
b~ezeway and garage which will
be in excess of the 20% lot
coverage limitation. The subject
oarcel is substandard in size and'~
is located in r~ R-40 Zone Dis~
trier. Loca~tf Property: 415
Fisherman s~ach Road, Cut-
chogue; also referred to as Lot
7 on the Map of Peconic Bay
Properties, Inc. (1931); County
~ax Map No. 1000-111-1-26.
7:53 p.m. Appl. No. 4048--
BURT LEWIS, JR. Variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article:
III, Section 100-32 and ArticleI
XXIV, Section 100-243 for
proval of office addition result-
lng in an expansion of the exist-
lng nonconforming use and in-
creasing the degree of noncon-
formance of the building set-
back in the front yard area. The
subject parcel is substandard in
size and is located in the Agri-
cultural-Conservation (A-C)
Zone District. Location of Pro-
petty: 6920 Main Road, Laurel,
NY; County Tax Map
1000-126-01~,.1; also referredL[o
as Lot Nos. I & 2 on the Map
of George 1. Tuthill (1929).
8:15 p.m. Appl. No. 4041--]
DONALD AND JEANNE'
GRIM. Amendment to Special
Exception approval under Appl.
No. 3491, hi this Light Industrial
(LI) Zone District for permis-:
COUNTY OF SUFF
STATI:_ OF NEW YORK
ss:
Patricia Wood,' being duly sworn, says that she is the
Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County;
and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been .pt~blished io said Long Island Traveler-Watchman
once each week for ...................... ~ .... weeks
successively, commencing on the ......................
Sworn to hcfore mc this (~c-C (lay of
sion to authorize recycling and ,
salvage facility, excavation andI
drainage yard (pursuant to Town/
Board Resolution adopted AprilJ
· /~-~. . . .
9, 1991, tO be used in conjunc-I .~-~/z.~%,. ~.. ~.,. :_..~/~,_~.,.4,. ,.~., .~.c?~, ' .....
tion with those uses conditional-I
ly permitted under Special Ex-~ Notary Public
ception No. 3491 (ZBA resolu- B/~RBARA ^. SCHNEIDER
tion adopted June 25, 1986) for a third dwelling unit in the rear NOTARY PUBLIC, St?re 01 New York
outside stockpiling of material accessory building, both in con- No. 4~06846
and related offices. Location of junction with multiple business Qualified in Suil01k g0tj~ty/
Property: LOt No. 2 on thel uses and existing single-family Commission Expires a°/31f. Z
Minor Subdivision Map No. 450 residential unit of this substan- the Zoning Ordinance, Article l--
of L.B. Glover; 11910 Oregon dard parcel. Location of pre- Section 100-13 as noticed to the
Road, Cutchogue, NY; Count~ raises: 13500 Main Road, Mat- adjoining property owners, as
Tax Map No. 1000-83-3-part.of tituck, NY; County Tax Map ID
4.4,¢ontaining4.59acres. No. 1 ll4-11-5. subject pertains to dwellin and/or
motel uses, and the installation
L/~'RE~E&20 P.m. Appl NO. ,1042 'CE~O.N. Va~ HamletParcel is nonconformingBusiness (HB) inZonethis of cooidng faciliites. Location of
ance to the Zoning Ordinance, j District containing approximatel Property: 61475 County Road
Article XXIII, Section one-half acre of total lot area. 48, Greenport, NY; County Tax
100-239.4B for permission to 8:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3959-- Map Parcel ID 1000-045-01-001
construct addition to dwelling! MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH and 002 (2.D, containing ap-
with a setback at less than 75 HARDY. Special Exception to proximately 7.5 acres. Zone Dis-
trict: Resort Residential (RR).
feet from the bulkhead. Loca- the Zoning Ordinance, Article $'Vi'he Board of Appeals will at
tion of Property: 8460 Peconic IX, Section 100-91B(2) (4) to
Bay Boulevard, Laurel, NY; permit either an accessory said time and plaee hear any and
County Tax Map Parcel No. apartment or second dwelling all persons or representatives de-
l000-126-11-21. The subject par. unit over stores, or alternatively siring to be heard in the above
matters. Written comments may
cci is substandard in size and is to permit multiple dwelling use also be submitted prior to the
located in the R-40 Zone within the existing mixed bust-/
District. ' ness/residential structure. LocaO) conclusion of the subject hear-
8:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3959-- tion of premises: 13500 Main ink. Each hearing will not start
MR. AND MRS. JOSEPHI Road, Mattituck, NY; County before the times designated
above. For more information,
HARDY. Variance to the Zon-I Tax Map ID No. 1000-114-11-5. please call 765-1809.
ink Ordinance, Article IX, Sec- The subject parcel is noncon-
forming in this Hamlet Business ' BY ORDER OF
t on 100-92, for perm ssion to Dated: July 25 1991.
Lncrease the degree of noncon- , (HB) Zone District containing
approximately one-half acre of THE SOUTHOLD TOWN
formance of the lot area for the total lot area. BOARD OF APPEALS
establishment or approval of a 8:50 p.m. Appl. No. 4039-- GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
second dwelling unit in an exist-. CLIFFSIDE ASSOCIATES. CHAIRMAN
lng dwelling structure and fo/(p Appeal for an Interpretation By Linda Kowalski
the establishment or approval of under the Definition Section of -1.l~' 1 X, 8/8/91 (5)
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN 0~ SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Enclosed herewith as confirmation of the time, date and
place of the public hearing concerning your recent application is
a copy of the Legal Notice, as published in the Long Island
Traveler-Watchman, Inc. and Suffolk Times, Inc.
Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time
specified in the event there are questions brought up during the
same and in order to prevent a delay in the processing of your
application. Your public hearing will not start before the time
allotted in the attached Legal Notice. Additional time will, of
course, be available. A drafted or final written copy of your
presentation, if lengthy, is always appreciated.
Please feel free to call our office prior to the hearing
date if you have any questions or wish to update your file.
Yours very truly,
Enclosure
GERA/~D P. GOEHRINGER
~CHAIRMAN
By Linda Kowalski
Copies of legal notice for August 15, 1991 hearings were mailed
to the following 8/6/91:
Mr. and Mrs. John H. Birkmier
48850 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Mr. John L. Parrott
Creative Retirement Planning, Inc.
30 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 4336
New York, NY 10112
Mr. Burt G. Lewis, Jr.
P.O. Box 983
Cutchogue, NY 11952
Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq.
P.O. Box 706
Cutchogue, NY 11935
(Re: McKeon)
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas McKeon
17 Massachusetts Blvd.
Bellerose Village, NY 11701
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Mr. Thomas C. Samuels
Samuels & Steelman
25235 Main Road
Cutchogue, NY 11~'35
(Re: Cervon)
P. Edward Reale, Esq. (Re:
Twomey, Latham, Shea & Kelly
P.O. Box 398
Riverhead, NY 11901
Hardy)
Richard T. Haefeli, Esq. (Re:
184 Main Street
P.O. Box 1112
Westhampton Beach, NY 11978
~r. Robert Coady Mr. James E. Fitzgerald, Jr.
250 Oak Avenue .Proper-T Services
Southold, NY 11971 P.O. Box 617, Cutchogue, NY 11935
(included copy of map of deck &
neighbor notice Re: Lowery)
Cliffside)
and Mr. Kenneth Tedaldi
130 Jessup Ave.
Quogue, NY 11959
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Zoning Board of Appeals
Office of the Town Clerk
July 16, 1991
Special Exception Appl. No. 4041
- DONALD & JEANNE GRIM
Transmitted herewith is Special Exception Appl. No. 4041 - DONALD &
JEANNE GRIM together with the Notice to Adjacent Property Owners,
the Minutes of First Meeting of Board of Directors of Oregon Rd.
Recycling, Inc., a copy of the deed, the Zoning Board of Appeals'
Questionnaire, a copy of the Town of Southold's Recycling and Salvage
Facility Permit, a Building Permit, a picture of the subject property,
a copy of the Resolution granting Oregon Road Recycling Corp. a
Recycling & Salvage Facility Permit dated April 9, 1991, a copy of a
Negative Declaration, a copy of the Resolution which issued a Conditioned
Negative Declaration, a copy of the Action of the Zoning Board of Appeals
dated April 9, 1986, a copy of the Action of the Zoning Board of Appeals
dated December 19, 1986, and a copy of the Site Plan Map.
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION
A. Please disclose the names of the owner(s) and any other
individuals (and entities) having a financial interest in the
subject premises and a description of their interests:
(Separate. sh~t may be attached.)
B. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for
- sa~e or being shown to prospective buyers? { } Yes
{F~4} No. (If Yes, plaas~ attauh COpy cur "condi~nns" of sale.)
C. Are there an~l~rop~sals to ~h~nge oz alter land contours?
D. 1. Are there any areas which contain wetland grasses?
2. Are the wetland areas~ ~own on the map submitted wi{h'
this application?
3. Is the property bulkh~aded bq~een the wetlands area and
the upland building area?
4. If your property contains wefflands or pond areas,'have
yOU contacted the Office of the TQw~.Trustees for its
determination of jurisdiction?
E. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of
proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea
level? ~///~ (If not applicable, state "N.A.")
F. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences
which e~t a~9~ not shown on the survey map that you
submitting?~ If none exist, please state "none."
G. Do you have any construg~ion taking place at this time
concerning your premises? ~ If yes, please submit a copy
of your building permit and'map as approved by t~e Bui~d~
Department. If none, please state, p~/t/~/~/~~
H. Do you. or any co-owner also own other land close to this
parcel?./V(~ If yes, please explain where or submit copies
of deeds.
I. Please listpresen~t u~e or operatio~g.conducted at this
parcel ~_¥~/P~/~O/F $-~3~-~ ~O6/~/ly~' and
.
proposed use ~-~f{~/-//~6 T ~//46t~ /",4Clkl77'
uthorized Sig~u~e and Date
3/87, 10/901k
§ 97-13
WETLANDS § 97-13
TOWN -- The Town of Southold.
TRUSTEES -- The Board of Trustees of the Town of
Southold. [Added 6-5-84 by L.L. No. 6-1984]
WETLANDS [Amended 8-26-76 by L.L. No. 2-1976; 3-26-
85 by' LL Na. 6-1985]: ~'~-'~'.~' -?
~ ~-;DAL WETLANDS: ~
(1) All lands generally covered or intermittently cov-
ered with, or which border on. tidal water~, or lands
lying beneath tidal waters, which at mean low tide
are covered by tidal waters to a maximum depth of
five (5) feet, including' but not limited to banks,
bogs, salt marsh, swamps, meadows, fiats or other
low lying' lands subject to tidal action;
(2) All banks, bogs, meadows, fiats and tidal marsh
subject to such tides and upon which grows or may
grow some or any of the following: salt hay, black
grass, saltworts, sea lavender, tall cordgrass, high
bush, cattails, groundseL maxshm~llow ~nd IOW
All l~nd immediately adjacent'co a tidal wetland as
defined in Subsection A(2) and lying within seven-
ty-five (75) feet landward of the most landward
edge of such a tidal wetland.
FRESHWATER WETLANDS:
(1) "Freshwater wetlands" as defined in Article 24. Ti-
tle 1, § 24-0107, Subdivisions l(a) to l(d) inclusive,
of the Environmental Conservation La~v of the State
of New York; and
(2)
All land immediately adjacent to a "freshwater wet-
land," as defined in Subsection B(1) and lying with-
in seventy-five (75) feet landward of the most land-
ward edge of a "freshwater wetland."
9705 2.25- ss
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY PERMIT
This is to certify that Jeanne M. Grim, of the Town
of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, whose
place of business is at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, is
hereby granted a RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY
PERMIT by the Town Board of the Town of Southold on
April 9, 1991, subject to the conditions specified in the
Town Board's resolution adopted on April 9, 1991, attached
to and made a part of this Permit.
In Witness Whereof I have set my hand and the Seal
of the Town of SouthoId this 12th day of April, 1991.
~/ Judith T. Terry ~
Town Clerk
Town of Southold
SEAL
N.Y.S.
TRANSFE!
TAX
$;14.00
TAX MAP
<<IGNATION
~,.1000
c. 083.00
03.00
)/o
'h4. 004
10176 ?i:598
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY.
T~INDENTURE, madethe 12th ~yo[ November ,nineteenbundredand eighty-six
BE17AIEEN LEANDER B. GLOVER, JR., residing at (no #) Cox's Lane,
Cutchogue, New York
partyofthefirstpart,~d DONALD J. GRIM,
Southold, New York, and JEANNE M.
Drive, East Islip, New York,
residing at 475 Jernick Lane,
GRACE, residing at 279 Keswick
party of the second part,
WlTNF_.~ETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration
paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs
or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lyingandbeing~ at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk,
and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on lthe easterly side of Oregon Road (North
Road) distant 572.53 feet measured southerly along the easterly side
of Oregon Road from the intersection formed by the easterly side of
Oregon Road with the southerly side of Cox's Lane; running thence South
59° 55' 31" East 513.96 feet; running thence South 30° 12' 50" West,
345.63 feet to land now or formerly of Zuhoski; running thence North
56° 48" 26" West and along said last mentioned land, 361.88 feet to
a point; running thence North 57° 24' 30" West and continuing along
said land now or formerly of Zuhoski, 337.24 feet to a monument set
in the easterly side of Oregon Road; and running thence North 60° 49'
44" East and along the easterly side of Oregon Road, 362.06 feet to
the point or place of BEGINNING.
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party
of the first part by deed dated June 29, 1969, and recorded in the
Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 2, 1969, in Liber 6578 Page 147.
Premises are not subject to a Credit Line Mortgage.
i0176 Pi;599
TOGETIIER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and
roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof: TOGETHER with the appurtenances
and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO
HOLD the prenfises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of
the party of the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything
whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of
the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid-
eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply
the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for
any other purpose.
The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires.
IH WITN1F-.~ WHEIIF. OF~ the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above
written.
. . i
NOV £.
IRAF S~
-. SUFFO(~,-
Leander B. Gfover/Ji-.
I~J.L ~ u
STATE O1: NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss:
On t~e 12t~y of Noveraber 1986 , ~or~ ~
person~ly ~me LEANDER B. GLOVER, JR.
to me known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
he executed the same.
// Notary ?ub!ic
RICHhRD F.
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 7432500, SuffoLk County
(:ommission Expires August 30, 1988
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day of 19 , before me
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and
say that he resides at No.
;
that he is the
of
, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he
knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so
affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora-
tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order.
STATE O1¢ NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day of 19 , before me
~ersonally came
to me known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged, that
executed the same.
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss:
On the day of 19 , before me
personally came
the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with
whom ! am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
;
that he knows
to be the individual
described in and' who executed the foregoing instrument;
that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
execute the same; and that he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto.
LEANDER B. GLOVER, JR.
TO
DONALD J. GRIM and
,JEANNE M. GRACE
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
OMNI ABSTRACT CORP.
475 SUNRISE HWY., P.O. BOX 1450
WESt BABYLON, N.Y. ~704-1450
fsf6) 669-227~ (212) 2a~-f8~8
(7lB) 470-0f7~
SECTION
BLOCK
LOT
COUNTY OR TOWN
TAX BILLING ADDRESS
Recorded At Request of Ticor Tdle Guarantee Company
RETURN BY MAIL TO:
Eckhardt & Sutton, P.C.
2020 Grand Avenue
Baldwin, New York 11510
Zip No.
MINUTES OF FIRST MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
of
OREGON RD. RECYCLING, INC.
The first meeting of the board was held at
on the 23rd day of APRIL 19 91 at
The following were present:
Jeanne M. Grim
10 o'clock A.M.
being a quorum and all of the directors of the corporation.
Jeanne M. Grim was nominated and elected
temporary chairman and acted as such until relieved by the president.
Jeanne M. Grim was nominated and elected
temporary secretary, and acted as such until relieved by the permanent
secretary.
The secretary then presented and read to the meeting a waiver of notice
of meeting, subscribed by all the directors of the corporation, and it was
ordered that it be appended to the minutes of this meeting.
The following were duly nominated and, a vote having been taken, were
unanimously elected officers of the corporation to serve for one year and un-
til their successors are elected and qualified:
President: Jeanne Grim
Vice-President:
Secretary: Jeanne M. Grim
Treasurer: Jeanne M. Grim
7
The president and secretary thereupon assumed their respective
offices in place and stead of the temporary chairman and the temporary
secretary.
Upon motion duly made, seconded
and carried, it was
RESOLVED that the seal now pre-
sented at this meeting, an impression
of which is directed to be made in the
margin of the minute book, be and the
same hereby is adopted as the seal of
this corporation and further
RESOLVED that the president and treasurer be and they hereby are
authorized to issue certificates for shares in the form as submitted to this
meeting and appended to the minutes of this meeting and further
RESOLVED that the share and transfer book now presented at this
meeting be and the same hereby is adopted as the share and transfer book
of the corporation.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, it was
R.~SOLVED that the treasurer be and hereby is authorized to open a
bank account in behalf of the corporation with
located at
and a resolution for that purpose on the printed form of said bank was
adopted and was ordered appended to the minutes of this meeting.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried~ it was
RESOLVED that the corporation proceed to carry on the business for
which it was incorporated.
8
The secretary then presented to the meeting a written proposal from
to this corporation.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the said proposal was
ordered filed with the secretary~ and he was requested to spread the same
at length upon the minutes, said proposal being as follows:
10 Shares to Jeanne M. Grim
8a
N°. 19628 Z
A D D R ESS 4[~~~0~~=~~ ~~. i~
This notice must be. displayed during construction
and returned to Bu,lding Dept. to get a certificate
of occupancy upon completion of work.
BUILDING INSPECTOR'S OFFICE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
LO IVG
R - 80
A-C
HD
Southold. N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
March 10, 1987
Mr. Donald J. Grim
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Site Plan for Office Building
Dear Mr. Grim:
Pleas~ let this confirm the following action taken by
the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 9, 1987.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve
the site plan for Donald J. Grim for construction of a two-story
office building accessory to the existing building located
at Oregon Road, Cutchogue, site plan dated as amended October
28, 1986 and as certified by the Building Department.
It was noted that this proposal has received a .special
exception from the Board of Appeals.
When the Chairman has endorsed the surveys, we will forward
one to you.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
cc: Building Department
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
October 23, 1986
Mr. Donald J. Grim
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: site Plan for Donald Grim
located at Cutchogue
Dear Mr. Grim:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, October 20, 1986.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve
the site plan for Donald Grim for construction of a storage
building located at Oregon Road, Cutchogue, site plan dated
March 10, 1986, subject to:
1. Receipt of three amended surveys indicating screening
around the area to be used for stockpiling with stockade~
fencing of between 4 and 6 feet in height, or evergreens
having a minimum hieght of four feet, along the road(north)
and westerly sides.
Upon receipt of the amended surveys, the Chairman will endorse
them.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
lApp
Southold Town Board o eals
MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHrlLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINDER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI
November 24, 1986
Mr. Donald J. Grim
475 Jer~ick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appeal No. 3491 (Special Exception)
Your Letter Received 11/3/86
Dear Mr. Grim:
This letter will confirm that the Board of Appeals has
reviewed your-letter dated November 2, ]986 wi.~h att~Rhed
Site Plan showing thj' evergreens and stockade gate screening
(added 10/28/86) prepared by Sealand Surveying & Engineering,
P.C.
The Board has accepted the site plan as to meeting the
condition of the Board's June 25, 1986 decision; however, it
should be understood that the "area for stockpiling materials,
i.e. gravel, sand, etc." as depicted on the site plan shall
not be expanded outside the 160' deep by 230" wide area ,
(unless a new application is filed and reconsidered).
A copy of thi~ letter is being furnished to the Town
Planning Board for their file.
Yours very truly,
cc: Planning
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
Board By Linda Kowalski
Appeal No. 3491 AC___TION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALs
ApPlication Dated April 9, 1986
TO: (Public Nearing May 22,
Mr. Donald j. Grim
415 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY l1971
TELEPHONE {516) 765.
1986)
' [ApPellant (s)
At a Meeting of the Zoning.Board of ~
the above appeal was
on your COnsiaered, and the action indic ,
[ ] Request Due to Lack of Access to Property
s takenVariance
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[X] Request for Special EXception Under the Zoning
Article IX , Section ]00-90(A) Ordinance
[ 3 Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article
· Section
~-- [ ] Request for
ApPlication of D
Ordinance · ONALD j. G
, Art]cl ~ - - RIM fo .
build' e IX, Sectio .- r a Spec)al Ex · ~ ~ -
lng and establ'~ ..... n 100-90 for n ..~._- ceptTon to _.
]~" uU~SlUe Stoc~.~,. ~e'""~lon to ..... the ZOulnq
Heavy Industrial Zoning -F,~lng of materia) u~ruct StOrage-
(Pending) Minor SubdivisDistrict- Location of Property: Lot No. 2,
ion No. 450 of L.B. Glover, south Side of Oregon
Road, Cutchogue; COUnty Tax Map District 1000 Section 83, 8lock 3
Part of Lot 4.4, containing 4 59 acres. '
,
WHEREAs, a public hearing was held and Concluded on May 22, 1986
in the Matter of the APplication of DONA__~LD j. G__~R/M under ApPlication
WHEREAS-,. the board members have personal]y viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and,
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony
md documentation Submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
l. By this application, appellant requests a Special Excep_
ion to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 for
~rmission to construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and
~tab]ish outside stockpiling of materials as shown on site Plan
~ted March 10, 1986 prepared by Sealand Surveying.
2. The premises in question is lOCated in the "C-l" Heavy
.dustria] Zoning District, COntains an area of 4.5913 acres
r 199,997 sq. ft.) with frontage along the south Side of Oregon
~ of 362.05 feet and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax
as District )000, Section 083, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
,ject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivi_
'P No. 450 of L.B. Glover before the Southold Town P]anning BOard.
(CONTINUED ON PAGE T_~O)
ED: June 25, 1986.
~ ZB4 (rev, 12/81)
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
~age'2 Appea~ No~3491
Matter of DONALD J. GRIM
Decision Rendered June 25,
1 986 ~.
3. The proposed garage and storage building is shown on the
March 10, 1986 site plan to be set back 150 feet at its closest
corner from the front property line and set back 50 feet from the
westerly (side) property line. The area for stockpiling of
materials (such as gravel, sand, etc.) is to be located 100 feet
from the rear property line, and 50 feet from both side property
lines.
In considering this application, the board finds and
determines that: (a) the use requested will not prevent the
orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties
in adjacent use districts; (b) the use will not adversely affect
the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town~
(c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general
purposes and intent of zoning. The board has also considered
subsections Ia] through Ill of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2]
of the Zoning Code.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by
Mr. Douglass, it was
RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for permission to
construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and establish
stockpiling of materials, all as shown by Site Plan prepared
by Sealand Surveying dated March 10, 1986, in the Matter of
the Application of DONALD J. GRIM, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
That the area to be used for stockpiling be screened with
stockade fencing of between 4 and 6 feet in height, or evergreens
having a minimum height of four feet, along the road (north)
and westerly sides.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs.
Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen was
tion was duly adopted.
Goehringer, Grigonis,
absent.) This resolu-
lk
. . .
GERARD P. GOEHRIN/G'ER, CHAIRMAN
July 10, 1986
Southold To n of'
MAIN I:~rlAl~- ~TATE R~AD 25 c~I~I. JTHI~HD. H.I.. N.Y.
TELEPHONE 151§~ 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3595 -
Application Dated December ]9, ]986
TO: Mr. D0na]d J. Grim [Appellant(s)]
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
At a Meeting of~the Zoning Board of Appeals held on March 5, ]987,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack ~f Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[ ~ Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article IX , Sectio~ ]00-93 (Bulk Schedule), ]00-9]
[ ] Request for
Application of DONALD J. GRIM for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article IX, Section 100-90, 100-93, Bulk Schedule, for permission to con-
struct two-story building for office use incidental to principal use of
the premises with an insufficient frontyard setback in this "C-l" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District. Location of Property: Lot No. 2, Minor
Subdivision No. 450; South Side of Oregon Road, Cutchogue, NY; County
Tax Map Parcel No. lO00-83-O03-part of Lot 4.4. Containing 4.59 acres.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on February 5,
1987 in the Matter of the Application of DONALD J. GRIM under Applica-
tion No. 3491; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and
documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
l. This is an application for a Variance from the Provisions
of Article IX, Sections 100-90 and 100-93, Bulk Schedule, of the
Zoning Code for permission to locate and construct 30' .by 40' wide
~u ~,,,~ .... .~ u~e~incidentat to the established commercial
use of the premises.
DATED: March 5, 1987.
Form ZB4 (rmv. 12/81)
2. The setbacks of the proposed building are: (a) 35 feet
from the front ~rop~rty3]ine [along Oregon Road]; (b) 40 feet
from the west side property line, (at its closest points).
3. The premises in ~6estion is located in the "C-I" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District, contains an area of 4.5913 acres
(or 19~99Y sq. ft.) with frontage along the south side of oregon
Road of 362.05 feet and is.identifie~ on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as Distric~ 1000, Section 08~, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
~CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
~' ...... -~ge 2~'-'~peal'No. 3595
.~/latter 'o f ~
//~De¢5 sion ~te n de re d~ll~a r c h~5,
1 987
subject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivision
No. 450 of L.B. Glover before the Southold Town Planning Board.
3. Under Application No. 3491, a Special Exception was
conditionally grnated by this Board on June 25, 1986 concerning
the existing trucking business (Oak Street Trucking).
4. Article IX, Section 100-93, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning
Code requires a minimum frontyard setback in this zoning district
of 150 feet. In viewing the setbacks of existing principal struc-
tures in the immediate area, the board finds that a setback at
~6t less than 35 feet would not be unreasonable. It is understood
that the use of this building will be'striCtly for t~6~office
operation of the trucking establishment.
5. It is ~lso the understanding of this board that the
p ect in question will not violate any other provisions of the
zoning code and will not be used for a~'second~ry or unrelated
business other than that esta61ished under Special Exception
#3491.
In considering this appeal, the board also finds and deter-
mines: (a) the relief requested is hot unreasonable; (b)
the circumstances are unique; (c) the relief requested is
not substantial in relation to those structures existing in
the area; (d) there will be no substantial change in the char-
acter of the area and the variance will not in turn be adverse
to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order
of the town; (e) there will be no increase in population density
resulting from the grant of this variance; (f) in consideration
of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by
allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by
Mr. Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, that a Variance for permission to locate 30' by
40' building for office use incidental to the present use of
the premises (as approved under Special Exception No. 3491),
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The building be no closer than 35 'feet to the front
property line [along Oregon Road];
2. The building be no closer than 50 feet to the west
property line; .
)~( The building be used for office use incidental to the
3.
)xisting principal business operation. (now Oak Street Trucking)
established und6.r Special Exception No. 3491.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer,
Doyen and Do. uglass. (Membe. r Sawicki was absent.)
tion was duly adopted.
Grigonis,
This resolu-
lk
u~a~u P: GOE'HR~(~
March 6, 1987
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765 - 1800
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney
Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town A i'~,ef~ ': i '-~
Jerry Goehringer, ZBA Chairman
I ,l\, J. JN - 6
May 31, 1991
Recycling and Salvage Yard Faciliti~_,.~..flQp__a~d-Gr-im-
Inquiry of May 21, 1991
We have received a request from Donald Grim inquiring as to
whether or not a Special Exception application is necessary for
the proposed recycling and salvage yard, to be used in
conjunction with the current Special Exception for the Oak
Street Trucking and storage yard activities.
Under the current Special Exception use for the Oak St. Trucking
Business, Condition #3 of the ZBA decision rendered March 5,
1987, provides that "the building be used ...incidental to the
existing principal business operation .... "
The Zoning Board Members have requested your legal opinion for
the above project. Attached is a copy of the proposed site plan
map. The premises is located in the LI Zone District, and a
copy of the LI zone provisions are also attached for your
convenience.
GG:lk
Attachment
$ou hold T wn 3oa d of Appeals
MAIN ROAD-STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I., N.Y. ~11c]71
TELEPHONE {5'16; 765-'1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3595
Application Dated December ]9, ]986
TO: Mr. D0na]d J. Grim [Appellant(s)]
475 dernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
At a Meeting of,the Zoning Board of Appeals held on March 5, ]987,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article IX , Sectio~ ]00-93 (Bulk Schedule), ]00-9l
[ ] Request for
Application of DONALD J. GRIM for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,
· Article IX, Section l-0-0~-90, 100-93, Bulk Schedule, for permission to con-
struct two-story building for office use incidental to principal use of
the premises with an insufficient frontyard setback in this "C-l" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District. Location of Property: Lot No. 2, Minor
Subdivision No. 450; South Side of Oregon Road, Cutchogue, NY; County
Tax Map Parcel No. lO00-83-O03-part of Lot 4.4. Containing 4.59 acres.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on February 5,
1987 in the Matter of the Application of DONALD J. GRIM under Applica-
.tion No. 3491; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and
documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, the beard made the following findings of fact:
1. This is an application for a Variance from the Provisions
cf Article IX, Sections 100-90 and 100-93, Bulk Schedule, of the
Zoning Code for permission to locate and construct 30' .by 40' wide
~u~ .... =d~,,~'-" ;'or~ or,' ':~'-~.~_._ u~e~ii'lcidental to the established commercial
use of the premises,
2. The setbacks of the proposed building are: (a) 35 feet
from the front ~rop6rty3]ine [along Oregon Road]; (b) 40 feet
from the west side property line, (at its closest points).
3. The premises in ~6~tion is located in the "C-l" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District, contains an area of 4.5913.~cres
(or 199:,997.sq. ft.) with frontage along the south side of Oregon
Road of 362.05 feet and is.identifie~ on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District lO00, Section 083, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
DATED: March 5,'1987. CHAIRM3%N, SOUTHOLD TO~FN ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
Form ZB4 (rmv. 12/81)
~yiatter of DONALD J.__~
Decision Re~-Mar~L'h 5,
1 987
subject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivision
No. 450 of L.8. Glover before the Southold Town Planning Board.
3. Under Application No.
conditionally grnated by this
the existing trucking business
3491, a Special Exception was
Board on June 25, 1986 concerning
(Oak Street Trucking).
4. Article IX, Section 100-93, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning
Code requires a minimum frontyard setback in this zoning district
of 150 feet. In viewing the setbacks of existing principal struc-
tures in the immediate area, the board finds that a setback at
~Bt less than 35 feet would not be unreasonable. It is understood
that the use of this building will be'striBtly for tfiB]office
operation of the trucking establishment.
5. It is ~lso the understanding of this board that the
p ect in question will not violate any other provisions of the
zoning code and will not be used for a~'second~ry or unrelated
business other than that established under Special Exception
#3491.
In considering this appeal, the board also finds and deter-
mines: (a) the relief requested is hot unreasonable; (b)
the circumstances are unique; (c) the relief requested is
not substantial in relation to those structures existing in
the area; (d) there will be no substantial change in the char-
acter of the area and the variance will not in turn be adverse
to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order
of the town; (e) there will be no increase in population density
resulting from the grant of this variance; (f) in consideration
of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by
allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by
Mr. Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, that a Variance for permission to locate 30' by
40' building for office use incidental to the present use of
the premises (as approved under Special Exception No. 3491),
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The building be no closer than 35 feet to the front
property line [along Oregon Road];
2. The building be no closer than 50 feet to the west
property line; .
e3. The be used for office use incidental to the
building
xisting principal business operation. (now Oak Street Trucking)
establishe.d unddr Special Exception No. 3491.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs.
Doyen and Do. uglass. (Membe. r Sawicki was
tion was duly adopted.
Goehringer, Grigonis,
absent.) This resolu-
lk
~' :~-~ 0 E'H ~N ~ ER ~-~A'I R~MA N
March 6, 1987 ~'
:c._t
" ~..';.~,1 ,.
:"':L Y ,,
~9' _~ /-' '~ '-':~_ ,~,
.~ff.(.,,-/! ., ,..~.~,/y MAIN RQAD-~TA'F~" RI:lAD 2..% ~QIJTHOL.,D, L,I,, N,Y, 11g71
~ TELEPHONE {516) 765-I,809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 349]
Application Dated April
TO: Mr. Donald J. Grim
475 Jernick Lane
Southolo, NY 11971
9, 1986 (Public Hearing May 22, 1986)
[Appellant(s)]
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on June 25, ]986,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[X] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article IX , Section ]00-90(A)
[ ] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[ ] Request for
Application of DONALD J. GRIM for a Special Exception to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 for permission to construct storage
building and establish outside stockpiling of material uses in this "C-l"
Heavy Industrial Zoning District. Location of Property: Lot No. 2,
(Pending) Minor Subdivision No. 450 of L.B. Glover, south side of Oregon
Road, Cutchogue; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 83, Block 3,
Part of Lot 4.4, containing 4.59 acres.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on May 22, 1986
in the Matter of the Application of DONALD J. GRIM under Application
No. 3491; and
WHEREA~,. the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted concerning this application;, and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
1. By this application, appellant requests a Special Excep-
tion to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 for
permission to construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and
establish outside stockpiling of materials as shown on site plan
dated March lO, 1986 prepared by Sealand Surveying.
2. The premises in question is located in the "C-l" Heavy
Injustrial Zoning District, contains an area of 4.5913 acres
(or 199,997 sq. ft.) with frontage along the south side of Oregon
Road of 362.05 feet and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District 1000, Section 083, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
subject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivi-
siop No. 450 of L.B. Glover before the Southold Town Planning Board.
"~,f~,DATED:, June 25, 1986.
Fornz ZB4 (rev. 12/81)
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
Page 2 - Appea~ No.
Matter of DONALD J. GRIM
Decision Rendered June 25,
1 986
3. The proposed garage and storage building is shown on the
March 10, 1986 site plan to be set back 150 feet at its closest
corner from the front property line and set back 50 feet from the
westerly (side) property line. The area for stockpiling of
materials (such as gravel, sand, etc.) is to be located 100 feet
from the rear property line, and 50 feet from both side property
lines.
In considering this application, the board finds and
determines that: (a) the use requested will not prevent the
orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties
in adjacent use districts; {b) the use will not adversely affect
the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town;
(c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general
purposes and intent of zoning. The board has also considered
subsections [a] through [1] of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2]
of the Zoning Code.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by
Mr. Douglass, it was
RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for permission to
construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and establish
stockpiling of materials, all as shown by Site Plan prepared
by Sealand Surveying dated March 10, 1986, in the Matter of
the Application of DONALD J. GRIM, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
That the area to be used for stockpiling be screened with
stockade fencing of between 4 and 6 feet in height, or evergreens
having a minimum height of four feet, along the road (northJ
and westerly sides.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis,
Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen was absent.) This resolu-
tion was duly adopted.
lk
GERARD P. GOEHRIN/G'ER, CHAIRMAN
July 10, 1986
Southold Town Board of AppealS
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI
November 24, 1986
Mr. Donald J. Grim
475 Jern_ick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appeal No. 3491 (Special Exception
Your Letter Received 11/3/86
Dear Mr. Grim:
This letter will confirm that the Board of Appeals has
reviewed your-letter..dated November 2, ]986 wi.~.h attached
Site Plan showing the evergreens and stockade gate sc'~eening
(added 10/28/86) prepared by Sealand Surveying & Engineering,
P.C.
The Board has accepted the site plan as to meeting the
condition of the Board's June 25, 1986 decision; however, it
should be understood that the "area for stockpiling materials,
i.e. gravel, sand, etc." as depicted on the site plan shall
not be expanded outside the 160' deep by 230-' wide area !.
(unless a new application is filed and reconsidered).
A copy of thi§ letter is being furnished to the Town
Planning Board for their file.
Yours very truly,
cc: Planning
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER
CHAIRMAN
Board By Linda Kowalski
TELEPHONE (5161 765.1,809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3491
Application Dated April 9, 1986 [Public Hearing May 22, 1986)
TO: Mr. Donald J. Grim ~ [Appellant(s)]
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on June 25, ]986,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[X] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article IX , Section ]00-90(A)
[ ] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
Request for
Application of DONALD J. GRIM for a Special Exception to the Zoning
Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 for permission to construct storage
building and establish outside stockpiling of material uses in this "C-I"
Heavy Industrial Zoning D~s~rict. Location of Property: Lot No. 2,
(Pending) Minor Subdivision No. 450 of L.B. Glover, south side of Oregon
Road, Cutchogue; County Tax Map District lO00, Section 83, Block 3,
Part of Lot 4.4, containing 4.59 acres.
WHEREAS, a public hearing
in the Matter of the Application
No. 3491; and
was held and concluded on May 22, 1986
of DONALD J. GRIM under Application
WHEREAg, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard, and their testimony was recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
1. By this application, appellant requests a Special Excep-
tion to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 for
permission to construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and
establish outside stockpiling of materials as shown on site plan
dated March 10, 1986 prepared by Sealand Surveying.
2. The premises in question is located in the "C-l" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District, contains an area of 4.5913 acres
(or 199,997 sq. ft.) with frontage along the south side of Oregon
Road of 362.05 feet and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District 1000, Section 083, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
subject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivi-
sion No. 450 of L.B. Glover before the Southold Town Planning Board.
D June 25, 1986.
ATED:
Form ZB4 (rev, 12/81)
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWq~
OF APPEALS
ZONING BOARD
Page 2 Appea( No. 3491
Matter of DONALD J. GRIM
Decision Rendered June 25,
1 986
3. The proposed garage and storage building is shown on the
March 10, 1986 site p)an to be set back 150 feet at its closest
corner from the front property line and set back 50 feet from the
westerly (side) property line. The area for stockpiling of
materials (such as gravel, sand, etc.) is to be located 100 feet
from the rear property line, and 50 feet from both side property
lines.
In considering this application, the board finds and
determines that: (a) the use requested will not prevent the
orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties
in adjacent use districts; {b) the use will not adversely affect
the safety, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town;
(c) the use is in harmony with and will promote the general
purposes and intent of zoning. The board has also considered
subsections [a] through [1] of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2]
of the Zoning Code.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by
Mr. Douglass, it was
RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for permission to
construct 40' by 60' garage/storage building and establish
stockpiling of materials, all as shown by Site Plan prepared
by Sealand Surveying dated March lO, 1986, in the Matter of
the Application of DONALD J. GRIM, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
That the area to be used for stockpiling be screened with
stockade fencing of between 4 and 6 feet in height, or evergreens
having a minimum height of four feet, along the road (north}
and westerly sides.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs.
Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen was
tion was duly adopted.
Goehringer, Grigonis,
absent.) This resolu-
lk
GERARD P. GOEHR N/G' , AIRMAN
July 10, 1986
TELEPHONE {516) 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No. 3595 '
Application Dated December ]9, ]986
TO: Mr. Donald J. Grim [Appellant(s)]
475 Jernick Lane
Southold, NY 11971
At a Meeting oflthe Zoning Board of Appeals held on March 5, 1987,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[ ~ Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article IX , Sectio~ ]00-93 (Bulk Schedule), 100-9]
[ ] Request for
Application of DONALD J. GRIM for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance,
Article IX, Section 100-90, 100-93, Bulk Schedule, for permission to con-
struct two-story building for office use incidental to principal use of
the premises with an insufficient frontyard setback in this "C-I" Heavy
Industrial ~oning District. Location of Property: Lot No. 2~ Minor
Subdivision No. 450; South Side of Oregon Road, Cutchogue, NY; County
Tax Map Parcel No. lO00-83-O03-part of Lot 4.4. Containing 4.59 acres.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on February 5,
1987 in the Matter of the Application of DONALD J. GRIM under Applica-
tion No. 3491; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and
documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and
the surrounding areas; and
W~EREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
· t~,e Provisions
1 This is an application for a Variance from ~
cf Article IX, Sections 100-90 and 100-93, Bulk Schedule, of the
Zoning Code for permission to locate and construct 30' .by 40' wide
build~,,~ .... .oF.~-~[~'~ -~__ ii~cidental to the established commercial
use of the premises.
2. The setbacks of the proposed building are: (a) 35 feet
from the fPont ~rop6rty[line [along Oregon Road]; (b) 40 feet
from the.west side property line, (at its closest points).
3. The premises in ~6estion is located in the "C-I" Heavy
Industrial Zoning District, contains an area of 4.5913 ~cres
(or 199~99Y sq. ft.) with frontage along the south side of oregon
Road of 362.05 feet and is.identified on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District lOOD, Section 083, Block 03, part of 4.4. The
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
DATED: March 5, 1987. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWq~ ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
Form ZB4 (rmV. 12/81)
~ge 2 - Appeal No. 3595
y~latter of DONALD J. GRIM
Decision Rendered March 5, 1987
subject parcel is referred to as Lot #4 of Pending Minor Subdivision
No. 450 of L.B. Glover before the Southold Town Planning Board.
3. Under Application No. 3491, a Special Exception was
conditionally 9rnated by this Board on June 25, 1986 concerning
the existing trucking business (Oak Street Trucking).
4. Article IX, Section 100-93, Bulk Schedule of the Zoning
Code requires a minimum frontyard setback in this zoning district
of 150 feet. In viewing the setbacks of existing principal struc-
tures in the immediate area, the board finds that a setback at
~6t less than 35 feet would not be unreasonable. It is understood
that the use of this building will be'stri6tly for t~Foffice
operation of the trucking establishment.
j5. It is ~lso the understanding of this board that the
p ect in question will not violate any other provisions of the
zoning code and will not be used for a~]second~ry or unrelated
business other than that es~a61ished under Special Exception
#3491.
In considering this appeal, the board also finds and deter-
mines: (a) the relief requested is hot unreasonable; (b)
the circumstances are unique; (c) the relief requested is
not substantial in relation to those structures existing in
the area; (d) .there will be no substantial change in the char-
acter of the area and the variance will not in turn be adverse
to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order
of the town; (e) there will be no increase in population density
resulting from the grant of this variance; (f) in consideration
of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by
allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. DRuglass, seconded by
Mr. Goehringer, it was
RESOLVED, that a Variance for permission to locate 30' by
40' building for office use incidental to the present use of
the premises (as approved under Special Exception No. 3491),
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The building be no closer than 35 'feet to the front
property line [along Oregon Road];
2. The building be no closer than 50 feet to the west
property line;
The building be used for office use incidental to the
3.
Existing principal business operation_ (now Oak Street Trucking)
establishe.d und~.r Special Exception No. 3491.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis,
Doyen and Do. uglass. (Membe. r Sawicki was absent.) This resolu-
tion was duly .adopted.
lk
~'2 ~0 ~'lt R~{ N GER';
March 6, 1987
lk Counfy, New York 316 - 765-180! ~0 · '
, t E~YED OF Southold, N. · 11971
§ 100.131
SOUTHOLD CODE
§ 100-140
(9)
Central heating and power plants accessory to the
principal use and the service of all structures on the
premises.
(10) Maintenance and utility shops incidental to the principal
use.
(11) Off-street parking and loading. Said areas shall not be
nearer than fifty (50) feet to any lot line or street and, if
generally adjacent to any street or any residence district,
shall be suitably screened by a landscaped strip of at least
ten (10) feet in width.
§ 100-132. Bulk, area and parking regulations.
No building or premises shall be used and no building or part
thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/
Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms t~ the Bulk
Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this
chapter by reference, with the same force and effect ~s if such
regulations were set forth herein in full?
ARTICLE XIVss
Light Industrial (LI) District
[Added 1-10-89 by L.L. No. 1-1989]
§ 100-140. Purpose.
The purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) District is to pr~ide an
opportunity for business and industrial uses on smaller lots than
would be appropriate for the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned
Office Park District.
~7 Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this ehapter, and the Parking
and Loading Schedules are in ~ 10~-19! and 100-192.
28 Editor's Note: Former Art. XIV, Administration and Enforcemen~ was r~numbe~d ~
Art XXVIII 1-10-89 by L.L. No. 1-1989.
§ 100-141 ZONING § 100-141
§ 100-141. Use regulations.
In the LI District, no building or premises shall be used and no
building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is
arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any
p.~[oeXCept the following:.
Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The
llowing uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses
permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
(1) Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-31A(2) and (3) of the Agricultural-Conservation
District.
Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-131A(2) to (5) of the Light Industrial Park/Planned
Office Park District.
(h_ses permitted by special exception of the Board Appeals.
of
e following uses are permitted as a special exception by the
Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
ny special exception use set forth in and as regulated by
100-131B(1) to (11) of the Light Industrial Park/
Planned Office Park District.
(2) Bed-and-breakfast uses as set forth in and as regulated
by § 100.31B(15), provided that no site plan approval is
required.
(3) Wineries. [Added 8-1-89 by L.L. No. 15.1989]
C. [Amended 5.9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The
following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for
residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by
Article XX, are subject to site plan review:
(1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily
incidental to any permitted or special exception use and
not involving a separate business.
10095 to- 25- ss
10094 lo- 25- ss
§ 100-122 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-131
§ 100-122. Bulk, area and parking regulations.
No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be
erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the
Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into
this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such
regulations were set forth herein in full?
ARTICLE XIII
Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park
(LIO) District
[Added 1-10-89 by L.L. No. 1-19892~]
§ 100-130. Purpose.
The purpose of the Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park
(LIO) District is to provide opportunity for the location of business
and professional offices, research facilities, industrial uses and similar
activities in an open, campus-like setting in areas which are not
appropriate for commercial activity or low-density residential
development. In this area, such uses can be established in an
attractive environment and serve both as a means of preserving the
open qualities of an area and providing an area adjacent to hamlet
areas where such uses can be appropriately developed with suitable
protection for ground- and surface waters. All uses must conform to
Suffolk County Health Department standards.
§ 100-131. Use regulations.
In the LIO District, no building or premises shall be used and no
building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is
arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any
purpose except the following:.
~ Ed~ter's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and Ihe Parking
and Loading Schedules are in ~ 100-191 and 100-192.
26 Editer's Note: This local law also rePealed former Art XUl, Site Plan Approval. as
amended. For current provisions, see Art. XXV. Site Plan Approval.
§ 100-131 ZONING § 100-131
A. [Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The
fo]lowing uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses
permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, arc subject to site
plan approval by the Planning Board:
(1)
(3)
Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-31A(2) and (3) of the Agricultural-Conservation
District.
Any permitted uses set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-10IA(3) to (5) of the General Business District.
Office buildings for businesses, governmental and
professional uses, including administrative training, data
processing, publication, financial and sales offices.
14) Telephone exchanges.
Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the
Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire
'* districts.
Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals.
The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the
Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan
approval by the Planning Board:
(1) Any special exception use set forth in and as regulated by
§ 100-101B(5), (7) and (10) of the General Business
District.
Light industrial uses involving the fabrication, reshaping,
reworking, assembly or combining of products from
previously prepared materials and which do not involve
the synthesis of chemical or chemical products other than
for pharmaceutical or research purposes or the process-
ing of any raw materials except agricultural raw
materials. Such uses may include industrial operations
such as electronic, machine parts and small component
assembly, as opposed to heavy industrial operations such
as automobile assembly or milling activities, and will be
subject to the following conditions:
10091 7- 25- 89
10090
§ 100-131
SOUTHOLD CODE
§ 100-131
(a) No such process or operation shall involve the
handling, storage or discharge of explosives or
permit upon the premises any virus or other typo of
infectious organisms identified with diseases of
animals or humans.
(b) No offensive noises, gases, fumes, smoke, odors, dust,
effluent or vibrations shall emanate from such use
and no waste products shall be discharged therefrom
of a character to create a nuisance or to be injurious
to health or to negatively impact groundwater.
(c) Such processes shall involve the use of only oil, gas or
electricity for fuel.
(3) Conference facilities, subject to the following conditions:
(a) Where rooms are provided for conference attendees,
said rooms are permitted as set forth and regulated
, by § 100-61B(4) of the Resort Residential (RR)
District. [Amended 5-23-89 by L.L. No. 7-1989]
(4) Public utility structures and uses.
(5) Printing or publishing plants.
(6) Truck or bus terminals (garages, parking facilities,
loading decks, etc.).
(7) Food processing and packaging plants, not including fish
processing plants.
(8) Wholesale and retail sales and repair of boats and marine
items.
(9) Boat building, boat servicing and beat storage.facilities.
(10) Restaurants.
(11) Sauerkraut manufacturing plants.
(12) Basic Utility Stage II airport, subject to the following
conditions:
10092 7- 25. s9
§ 100-131 ZONING § 100-131
(a) Minimum parcel size shall be one hundred (100)
acres.
(13) Bed-and-breakfast uses as sot forth in and as regulated
by § 100-31B(15), provided that no site plan approval is
required.
(14) Wineries. [Added 8-1-89 by L.L. No. 15-1989]
C. [Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The
following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for
residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by
Article XX, are subject to site plan review:
(1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily
incidental to any permitted or special exception use and
not involving a separate business.
(2) Wall signs as set forth in and regulated by § 100-
81C(2Xb) of the Limited Business District, limited to a
maximum size of thirty (30) square feet in are~
(3) Freestanding or ground signs as set forth in and
regulated by § 100-101C(3) of the General Business
District.
(4) Fully enclosed storage facilities incidental to the principal
(5) Open storage as set forth in and regulated by § 100-
101C(4) of the General Business District.
(6) Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities for the exclusive
use of executives and employees of the principal use and
their families.
(7) In*service training schools for employees of the principal
(8) Private garages for the storage and service of motor
vehicles owned by the owner of the principal use or the
executives or employees thereof, or visitors thereto,
including the sale of them, but not to the public generally
of gasoline, oil and minor accessories.
10093 ~o- ss- s9
)ARb OF_APP.-ALS,TOwN OF $OUTHOI O
In the Molter or thc Petition of
tm~_Bo;rd of Appeals of the Town
NOTICE
TO
ADJACENT
PROPERTY
YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE:
1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to notation the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southnld
orequesta (Variance} al Ex (Special Permit) (Other) ~ ~--
2. That the property which is the subiect of thc Petition is located adiacent tB y. pur property an~'-;is 4t,es-
3. That thc property which is the subiect of such Petition is located in the following zoning district:
4 That b% such Petiti.n, the undersigned will request thc following retief:
I c. t' -f I
5. Tha~ tko provi>ign~ of the 5out~old Town Zonin~ Code aoolicable ~ot~e retief sought ~y tko unaer-
signed are ~cla ~,','~ ~o~ M~ ,
[ ] Section 280-a. ~ew York Town Ltw for approval of access over
6. That within fi~e days from the date hereof, a written ?edtion requesting the relief specified above
be filed in the 5outhotd Town Clerk's Office at ~ain Road, 5ou~hoid. New York and you may then and thc~c
exaDme the same during r~gular officehour~. (5~6) 765-1809.
7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing mus~ be held on the matter by thc
Board of Appeals;that a notice of such hearing mu~t be puklished at least five days prior to ~he date of
hearing in ~he Suffolk Time~ and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapcr~ p~bliskcd
Town of 5outhold and designated for the publication of ~uch notice~; tha~ you or your represe.t~tNe
righ~ to appear and be heard at such hearing.
petitioner
Owners'Names:
Post Office Address
Te 1. No.
[Copy of sketch or plan
purposes.]
showing
proposal
to. be attached
for convenience
ADDRESS
P 271 450 129
RI=CBPT FOR CERTNFIEO MAIL
t NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
P 271 450 127
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
P 271 450 126
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
STATE OF NEW YORK )
SS.:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK }
names; that the addresses set opposite the n:mes of said persons are the addresse~ of said persons ~s shown on
th~ curren[~ss~n[~ll of [h~ Town of 5ou~hold;tha~ said No[ices wcrc mailcd a~ [h~ Unhcd Stat~s Post
floc a[ ~/~/~ ; that' said Notices were mailed to ench of s~id persons by
Sworn t~'\before me ,his
day of ~-~,¢,--¢~'~ ,
~o[:ry Public
MARY ANN C'fBULSKJ
NOIAR¥ PUBLIC,, State o! New ¥0~
Besldmg m Suffolk Count/
fie 52.5895900 .~.
(This side does not have to be
property ownerS.)
completed on
form transmitted
to adjoining
72 C~PD/~5 ga~fs~ r.] = . . 4.3 reft. ft. req~rd
SANITARY CA,L;C~.,A~IGN
-' " ' '~' .... T RAGE BUILDING
1 - 8' di~ x 12' deep pool provided.
pARKING;
T~EE (si 8PACES REOU~EO
F~E (e) SPACES P;OWEO 513
/
/
\ 6' '~ o
PARKING=
THREE & ONE HALF (3.1~) SPACES REQUIRED
FOUR (4) SPACES PROVIDED
PARK~V6b
TEN (10) SPACES REQUIRED
TEN (10) SPACES PROVIDED
KEY
So~e 1"= 600'
~.o* O)
/£
/
~~ ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN SEA LEVEL
~,. ~' ~ I~- ...... ,~~
~ ~ DRAINAGE L~C~ P~LS'
~ ~r~ DRAINA GE'OA~L~ ~NS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TYPICAL WELL DETAIL ~o,o~o x ~r~t~r=
= 4" ~(~, MA~E TREES EXIS~ ~r ro ~L~ Pro~ded ~ ~ x ~'~ ~ ~ ~v~
PA ~ T
~pt. apaoifloa~on~) OWNER/APPUCANT
~BDtVlSION FOR LEANDER
~ T~ SEPEMBER' 2~, 198~ BY
~UNG & YOUN~ SURVEYORS,
~ 4~ ~ t~ '
A~EA ~ 199,9~ e~'ff, or 4.~914 acres
~E X
/LOT COVERAGE
BUILDINGS - 10475 sq.f~ = 5%
SCALE, SHED, CRUSHER
CONC PADS,ETC
4975sqff~- = 2.5 %
SITE PLAN
-" FOR
DONALD GRIM
L OCA TED A T
, CUTCHOGUE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK coUNTY., N. Y.
1000 - 83- 03 , 4.5
Scale I" = 20
Feb. I, 199,0.
~ = P~OP~OSED
~ = P~OPO)SED
ELEVATION
CON TO U R
SHEILDED LIGHT
SOURCE(H. R SOO/OM FLOOD)
~.Y.$. LIC.
OF
./
~ * ~ '~' LA~'N&OTHE~?PAVEMENT 41BOOSQ FT
BU~ ZONE o~s r~ r L -, I 4~ X ~ 40.5~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aewag~ disppe~
' ~ ~ m~ ~ ~,~[~ ~ ~ o' , ~ , at~ds for tit~ ~orvey~ ~ emt~hed
SCHOOL ~TRICT 9 ~r~ ~ ='~.~ =A~. ~of~Sefvme~. ~ byt~L.tA.L.A~d~O.~d~d.~op~d PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C.
~' ~ 6 ~L~e ~'~ x 18' Deep for eu~ use ~ ~ ~W Yo~ 8tate L~d (~18) 78~ - 50~0
fieldTitle Aesociaffon. P. O. BOX 909
. SALARY LEA~ P~ ahown hereon ~e frum ' MAIN ROAD '
FIRE oI$TRICT '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fr== other,
90 108