Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5793 33 Gt4-I aVMIAG - --- -- -------- - ------ - --- - 593 S8 s3--'- -F I OL i I I " — e0rt0m or ewrr I a jd a �w aZ LINE OF 'LANDWARD LIMIT OF NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA' AS DESIGNATED BY COASTAL oz \ EROSION LINE MAP DATEDA FORMER WATER 6-29-88 SHEET 14 OF 49 JOO9 1OLE° EASEMENT VERIFY WITH PHOTO B 51-606-63 fFE \ o S.C.W.A. IF ABANDONED JOOO 1R A p0 63 \ V1 4 uG 8, 95 \ 3 \ 100'-6 P \ \ r R�5 `ve F \N\\ pj � 33• 971' \ N84-08'30 INSET 1'-30 POLE ° 7 \\ y5� zoo,00' EASEMENT PER SURVEY BY R, VAN TUYL 10-17-86 SOUND DRIVE (NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE) - 4 ELEVATIONS ASSUMED DATUM \ 2' CONTOUR INTERVALS \ 5' CONTOUR INTERVALS BETWEEN TO BLUFF \ S.C.T.M.# DIST. 1000 SECT. 033.00 BLOCK 04.00 LOT 035.002 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP N07 BEARING ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS THE LAND SURVEYORS INKED SEAL OR DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON FROM PROPERTY LINES VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE COAL OR TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW PURPOSE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED'TO ESTABLISH TO BE A TRUE VALID COPY PROPERTY LINES OR FOR ERECTION OF FENCES CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE COMPANY,GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON. AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITU11ONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY Bya<tGmL,� � SITUATE AT Z� GREENPORT 57 q� TOWN of SOUTHXOLD, COUNTY of SUFFOLK, STATE of NEW ypRg CNDG OFNF�/" CERTIFIED TO: H G.tijc LISA Mc Q UILKIN REVISED: pG 9� LAND SURVEYING TFIRSTAMERICAN TITLE INS, CO., GERI, 4/24/00 Z 274 EAST MAIN STREET -KLINE, 6/6/01 ADD EASEMENT EAST ISLIP, NEW YORK 11730 CYNTHIA ARMINE-KLINE 7/17/00 COASTAL EROSION 20v aP PHONE: 631-277-3605 4/02/04 I.G.P. U C. y 9 12/13/05 UPDATE DATE: 4/6/00 SCALE:1"= 60' FILE N0. 316-00 l LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLLD TOWI t,01i",RING BOARD OF APPEALS THU11 iJANUARY 26,2006 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2006: 10:20 A.M. GERI ARMINE KLEIN #5793. A variance is requested under Section 100-231, based on the Building Inspector's August 15, 2005 Notice of Disapproval concerning a request for approval of a fence shown on the 12/13/05 survey, as-built, prior to recent changes. The fence exceeds the code limitation of four feet when located in the front yard, at 160 Sound Avenue and Sound Road, Greenport; CTM 33-4-35.2. Zone District: R-40 Low-Density Residential. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office (631) 765-1809, or Linda.Kowalski@Town.southold.ny.us. Dated: January 6, 2006. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RUTH D. OLIVA, CHAIRWOMAN By Linda Kowalski FORM NO. 311 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 15, 200 TO: Robert Bohn A/C Klein r' PO Box 55 Peconic,NY 11958 Please take notice that your application dated August 10, 2005 For permit to construct a fence at Location of property: 160 Sound Avenue, Greenport,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 33 Block 4 Lot 35.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-231, which states, "Fences walls or berms may be erected and maintained subject to the following height limitations: A When located in the front yard of residential zones the same shall not exceed four feet in height" The proposed front yard fence measures 6 feet. 4"—�uthor&d ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. F ED APPL.��,,TION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For fftce Use Only Fee:$� O ''iX 4,r F11ed By: ] to Assigned/Assignment No. 3 Office Notes: p ZONING BOARD OF 6aPP'ALS Parcel Location: House No./66 Street '- LL't rj �% Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section, Block '_Lot(s) Lot Size— Zone District I (WE) APPEAL HE TT DATED: TERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR Applicant/Owner(s): 9 e-e!' ,,Q'khj r Aft Mailing �tv Address:.&e)� ®l t! nL4:2.n eorl NV 188 Telephone:-•7/9 <p V 67— C f NOTE: If applicant is not the owner,state if applicant is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc. Authorized Representative: Address:F•®, t .0 G�j')/� �• %M57 Telephone:_ `�/� s���� %/ / tk)(' 74�' </PA /6 Please specify who you wI correspondence tb be mailed to, from the above listed names: ❑ Applicant/Owner(s) Authorized Representative ❑ Other: ��''// WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED �/,a XV FOR: ❑Buiiding Permit ❑ Certificate of Occupancy ❑Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Change of Use ❑Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article,Section,Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article X X d 19 Section 100- 3 1 Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ,ISA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ❑ A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ❑Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ❑Reversal or Other A prior appeal❑has JX has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year r • Page 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Z� 5 Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, If granted, because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested Is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the variance been self-created? (3<) Yes, or ( ) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built? ( ) Yes, or ' ( ) No. S (6)/Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to ^difficulty in meeting the code requirements: .(attach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that Is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on next page to apply USE VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorne therwise aroceed to the si nature a nd notary area below. Si nature of Appellant or Authorized Agent Sworn to before me his (Agent must submit Authorization from Owner) day of .. ... , 0 (Notary Public) ZBA App 9/30102 BARBARA ANN RUDDER Notary Public,State of New York No.4855805 Qualified In Suffolk County, Commission Expires April 14, u' N 330 BOO :J 4 _N- `Qu\O FOR PCL.NO. 7 ,o+ SEE SEND. Iy", _ TOWN OF 035-01-024 . 1 ,v 2Daa xma 3 w Ag ° N ay TpG "1b SOUTHOLD 35.2 'Q• J A 35.3 S.BAId b°t y�J c ppm ,°° VC10 33 t °a 1"T e%`Iy 9 4 ,w SO •y1 BBz x166'1 5� � m +°° 5,'L°° '�' +s,5°° ,fib d," •,s69"` J,Gt, �sQ,Q°°b ,' 101 SG��• ��'° �9� ey ",Tqb 55 A°�°;�e9`°� ,P�R,° q`r'F�,$�1� ,e��`'�Fr �' ary� $°A p,�, ,s a �9z ,•aQ�^ "'I .y%� �9 a ryb � eb +,y,5b, $11� X16 �b'I°w ;• 'R s 1 ,° 29a1 2 a "•" 2 '6 ,� ry5 � Al ,,° S,a b' y, aro. a 1 2 �9• Sy° $ d° ° ,lA Ary e° s sb d+ 'a fi \. ° 'F'�ryA '°s s^ �° •v ✓� 19+°` E Ct o, 0 5 ° 1 `3 ' s+ ,� � ti� 8 ° � n C�4� ,y°n' . Nen u OO'1'GOa Ir B ,`"''°,° S ,+ 6 °° •1�' AA 5° r� `ye 0+,y s1°°as °•\ am � � '°s'S�' ani�N �un9 zz� ,A1., a Q ,9• °0.t'i''° 5, iU.°° ,S A �6 ' 11' Qom° �' a° .�i,°(('�,�i A 5s fig• •T ,,9�3" 1.9�7' uu °o' s,°rye oY \5 "" ti97 ,sa a+ e w ,NP°�` `5 .Os•y°,", p1, +.b " 2TOWN OF • \ , ,S ,,• d \9• Ja 5` \ ° , a 65" SOUTHOLD � ` »• ,a s•Rs N� 9 nu a :,�, `e�°; ,lg�b � '�' ,e o .S•�"" e'OZ ? W o tiw na vJ �ezi � �, �Q• 'S�9 v ` 1 n 3�;° � , �'' 1.1A1e1 L2Ale1 G<< pOND ess A•S '+° u 33"° TOWN OF ' N,\ 32 , ,�^ un Ab ° ±N.i3 ppGEl ° s s° SOUTHOIO 5 uu© ° SNL 1T '' oQENS ° Aa' s's 1 O,,A ZP s 166T 6A1c1 , ,°6 a Iev r nab p'Q'Ary ,zs ° 9 1�Plct ,1 x,5° 7 A 1 s, 19'SP apo (la .c¢ 1.3A1c1 ,)o °6 e 5 w O,� s u, 'J 1• °0 01 �.'(l• u p&10 xnu 3 ae " '' ,y0 so$•y9 , 9 �Py \� �3e ,sem iy19�"°S 3$0 ACL.NO. xss 11 •y0 11 ae ,aev, 2 EC.NO z-ozz 3 M Ier 2 U. •1lOPEN 11 ACEI >> u s ,r 30,e° �s�S16 _\��l•�`r /« $20 sa o _ aa5 , 1'1'1e �° ° �� ` °'e'SO,• N 327 000 LINEin 1 c c ENNEt a° lsa zoo ^ 9 OPERTIESs. NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K SOUND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO �ISTRICT ®Bdq� MAINTENANCE,ALTERATION,SALE OR 4® Real Property Tax Service Agency Y ISLAND 075 DISTRIBUTION OF ANY PORTION OF THE p. 033 VILLAGE OF SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP IS PROHIBITED ®� e' County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 130 03a O 3 WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ' SCALE IN FEET M LONG �'�4®� 200 0 ]DO IW A 09D 40 REAL PROPERTY TA%SERVICE AGENCY P DISTRICT NO lOOO PROPERTY MAP '1;ae•�y�f.: v'+vet=.it.=a�i"i.> � /.:;a=4?^H '�"r.-r"i._ - -_ '_- 'st�r v�Iv::>ii'S' _ -.'v`3r9':."e'.ls .+$��`v..i'�^'3.c e,y_...,.�:.+ ..-r',"'e�• � I j I �I - Page 4 —Minutes Meeting held February 2,2006 Southold Town Board of Appeals 3:05 P.M. OVLASID REALTY LLC #5828. Requests for Variances under Section 100-32 (Bulk Area Schedule), based on the Building-Inspector's December 9, 2005 Notice of Disapproval concerning the applicant's Lots 3 and 4, proposed with a land area of less than the code required 80,000 square feet in an Agricultural-Conservation (AC) Zone District. Location of Property: 1275 Cedar Beach Road, Southold; CTM 89-3-1.1. 3:10 P.M. NICHOLAS ALIANO #5846. Request for Variances: (1) under Section 100- 239.4A(1), based on the Building Inspector's January 5,2006 Notice of Disapproval,concerning a building permit(#31581-Z)issued in error,for a location set back less than the code required 100 feet from the top of the Long Island Sound bluff, and (2) based on the Building Inspector's January 13, 2006 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-244, for a reduced front yard setback for alternative relief with the applicant's suggested new dwelling size and location at less than the required 100 feet from the top of the bluff and less than the required 40 feet from the front yard lot line. Location of Property:3705 Duck Pond Road, Cutchogue; CTM 83-1-12. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,to authorize advertising of the following application for March 30,2006: 10:30 A.M. PETER S. DOODY#5847. Request for a Variance under Section 100-33, based on the Building Inspector's October 26, 2005, Notice of Disapproval, amended January 10, 2006, concerning a request to building an accessory swimming pool in a yard other than the code required rear yard,at 260 Orchard Street, Orient; CTM 1000-25-3.4.1. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Dinizio, Simon and Weisman. This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). Absent was Member Goehringer. RESOLUTIOUS/OTHER ACTION, Continued B. Resolution to accept Geri Armine Klein's request to withdraw Appeal No. 5793 (fence variances at Sound Road, Greenport), pending submission of alternative plans with a new application. C. Brief reviews of pending files and general discussions by Board Members followed. There being no other business properly coming before the Board at this time, Chairwoman Oliva declared the meeting adjourned. The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, A1daLKowalski 3/706 Included by Reference:Filed ZBA Decisions(12r2o I-.-0, ) J Ruth D. Oliva, hairwoman Approved for Filing e w i, ti r BOTTOM OF BWFF 7pgp i O b � o for LINE OF 'LANDWARD LIMIT \ OF NATURAL PROTECTIVE -'1 \ �P� \\-r- FEATURE AREA' AS \ p� DESIGNATED BY COASTAL for \ EROSION LINE MAP DATED \ P X FORMER WATER 8-29-88 SHEET 14 OF 49 �0�9 FoLf o \ PHOTO # 51-606-83 /64, \ p EASEMENT VERIFY WITH S.C.W.A. IF ABANDONED �A3 N .W \ NN 5�y' 9c•- �y96 q ��S \ � F A `� \ "A JSP o✓ N if ll P tr p t 3 so N O \ 9 \ 3 '1� � ✓ o � O\ N 1 l E 60 .L S Ilk \ \v\ 39�RS4G� N W \\ \ GOJ w Po $o w 6 YJ3 33. 971, p 9 \ 46 Fo9sX84-08.30,, INSET Ge EF 9% _-� 9s i \ 1'=30' Foy 0 9.7 0.00, \ EASEMENT PER SURVEY BY R, VAN TUYL 10-17- 11' SOUND D ' E 86 _ \ (NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE) RIV -� g \\� ELEVATI❑NS ASSUMED DATUM 2' CONTOUR INTERVALS \ 5' CONTOUR INTERVALS BETWEEN TOP/BOTTOM BLUFF \ \ S.C.T.M.# DIST. 1000 SECT. 033.00 BLOCK 04.00 LOT 035.002 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY ISA COPIES F THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING VIOLATION F SECTION 7209 OF THE EMBOSSED LAND SURVEYORS INKED SEAL OR DISTANCES SHOWN HERE QIV FROM PROPERTY LINES NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE FOR A 70 BE A TRUE VALID COPY PURPOSE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED TO ESTABLISH LINES OR FORIS CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PE SONPERTY FOR MOM THE SURVEYCTION OF FENCES INSTITUTIONPREPARED LISTED HEREON- AND FTOOTHE ASSIGNEESTHE COMPANY FOVERNMTHE LENDING INTAL D LENDING CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEOUENTT OWNERS N SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY t G _ SITUATE AT GREENPORT `JAf TOWN of SOUTHHOLD, '�6-7 %� P�E OF NF�� ���� COUNTY SUFFOLK, STATE of NEW YaRK i bND -t� MC Q UILKIN R TIFIED T D; REVISED: _ LAND SURVEYING FIRST 4/24/00 ` Z 274 EAST MAIN STREET ARMINEAKL MEAN TITLE INS, CO., GERI, '. 6/6/01 ADD EASEMENT � a * EAST ISLIP, NEW YORK 11730 CYNTHIA ARMINE-KEINE oP PHONE: 631-277-3605 S 4 7/17/00 COASTAL ER <q � OSION y 4/02/04 I.G.P. U.C. DATE: 4/6/00 SCALE: 1"- 60' FILE N0. 316-00 12/13/05 UPDATE l Jan 27 06 10: 10a C- i�s armine 718 6 4 6905 p. 1 1 d°f 0 ,' F� Geri Ar► iein 65 Montague Street#3D 160 Sound Drive Brooklyn,New York 11201 Greenport,New York 11944 (718)624-6905 (631)477-6102 (917)974-4492 r v .lanuary 26,2006 F' AX 631 765-9064 Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Southold,New York 11921 RE: Application for a Variance#5793 Dear Sirs and Madams of the Board: Thank you for your time and patience today during the hearing on the above referenced matter. I relied upon the experience and reputation of my contractor,Mr.Robert Bohn, when deciding what type of fence to install. I again relied upon him to handle this application for a variance,which he thought would be routinely granted. I am now acting on my own initiative to request that this matter be continued so that i may submit a proposal which would hopefully address the esthetic concerns of my neighbors,the legal responsibility of the Board and the safety concerns I have regarding my family living next to an ongoing criminal hot spot. In the alternative, I request that the pending application be withdrawn so that I can re-submit a new application for a variance which will also address these issues. It was not until this morning at the hearing that I became aware that Mr. Bohn had not properly corrected the hazardous condition which exists at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive. I have instructed Mr. Bohn to address this problem immediately. I would greatly appreciate it if a Code Officer could be made available to assist Mr.Bohn in marking the required 30 foot setback so that error will not compound error. I will gladly pay the Town any fee which corresponds with this request for a Code Officer`s assistance. Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of this request. 1 await your decision. Respectfully, Geri Armine-Klein t Page 1 of 1 Kowalski, Linda From: Kowalski, Linda Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:24 AM To: Forrester, Ed Subject: Klein fence Sound Rd intersection Gpt Tracking: Recipient Delivery Forrester,Ed Delivered: 1/27/06 9:24 AM 2 Hi Ed, good morning, Wanted to let you know that the ZBA did not appear to be receptive to approving the 6' high fence along the front yard areas, and an alternative was offered to Mrs. Klein to consider. Mrs. Klein and her contractor were not prepared at the hearing yesterday to discuss alternatives (I guess they thought variances were routinely granted), and she would like to submit alternative plans with landscaping, etc. Her three options appear to be- (1)to withdraw the present application, and file a new application with landscaping plan and different proposal, or(2) to ask that the hearing be reopened to discuss other alternatives, or (3)to accept the alternative that the Board votes on next week and file a request for an amended application if she's not receptive to the alternative relief This morning Ms. Klein faxed a request using option (1). We also indicated that the property marker for the 30 ft. distance limited to 30" In height at an intersection is done by the owner's surveyor, not the enforcement dept of the town, and apparently part of the fence is over the property line on the town's highway side. (She thought that you would mark the locations for her to move and modify the fence.) We have a copy of the Klein letter available, if desired for your records. Thank you, Linda K. Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 ext. 5011 fax 765-9064 1/27/06 �z LONC ISLAND SOUND z 66� WATER9 EDGE 6� BOTTOM OF BWPP 70�p O 8 � I d `O` o � �o 6% • o � �.mai `\ \ for LINE OF 'LANDWARD LIMIT OF NATURAL PROTECTIVE \ "p g \ 7 FEATURE AREA' AS \ DESIGNATED BY COASTAL for \ EROSION LINE MAP DATEDFORMER WATER A 8-29-88 SHEET 14 OF 49 J°°9 POLE ° `� EASEMENT VERIFY WITH PHOTO # 51-606-83SFE \ S.C.W.A, IF ABANDONED \ a iGG °g Q� mss. � \ V• o,, oNA3 N `� \ q s9 \ �JOp cf oN 100' JOP WPO A'3�, 03 N 9 ' \ s � RAS,11t \ oa X10 4` pry Ns .pf o ? .Dl, Lyr\ 4Nv '!9y 9GG� W J;LA JG�G9 N �a ` 6 97 P 9 \ 96, SS Po 9s N84 N8'08'30"0, P \ e5 9j` ` 96 1' \/ IN ET P GP EPOLE —� 9.7 200.00' EP SOUKD DRIP— —E—_-- — \ EASEMENT PER SURVEY BY R. VAN TUYL 10-17-86 (NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE) 4 ELEVATIONS ASSUMED DATUM 2' CONTOUR INTERVALS \ 5' CONTOUR INTERVALS BETWEEN TOP/BOTTOM BLUFF \ S.C.T.M.# DIST. 1000 SECT. 033.00 BLOCK 04.00 LOT 035.002 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A THE LAND SURVEYORS INKED SEAL OR DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON FROM PROPERTY LINES VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC NEW YORK STATE EDUCTION LAW PURPOSE AND ARE NOT TO R USED TO ESTABLISH TO BE A TRUE VALID COPY PROPERTY LINES OR FOR ERECTION OF FENCES CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE COMPANY. GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON. AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS I .' SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY � SITUATE AT � GREENPOR T TOWN of SOUTHHOLD, COUNTY of SLNDCZV60 IE OF/V¢ UFFOLK, STATE o1- f NEW YmRK -__ H G.M� 09 LISA Mc Q UILKIN CFR TIFIED TO: - REVISED: LAND SURVEYING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS, CO., GERI, 4/24/00 z 274 EAST MAIN STREET ARMINE-KLINE, 6/6/01 ADD EASEMENT o Y a EAST ISLIP, NEW YORK 11730 CYNTHIA ARMINE-KLINE Fys��0 2,o OQ PHONE: 631-277-3605 7/17/00 COASTAL EROSION 4q S 4/02/04 I.G.P. U.C. S, 12/13/05 UPDATE DATE: 4/6/00 SCALE: 1"= 60' FILE N0. 316-00 Jun 06 05 02: 09p cynthia armine 718 624 6905 p. 2 LONG ISLAND SOUND `� to O \ OF LINE OF 'LANDWARD LIMIT OF NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA'AREA' AS \ DESIGNATED BY COASTALo o � o A + FORMER WATEF EROSION LINE MAP DATED ,y ' EASEMENT VERIF 8-29-88 SHEET 14 OF 49 fe• f S.C.W.A. IF ABANI PHOTO N 51-606-83 ����` 'Y \\ B• 6� ��? as tG? o >�• so -� q \' Xn INN P odb \ y�0 o \ A 7tl- \ $ \ � 6 e� e� �a b ,o ro 10 QLip f \ • � J � �OJQD¢ N G \ of 0 / \ D.O0• d C/ v SOUND DRrVP, `a -`- EASEMENT PER SURVEY BY R. VAN TUYL 10-17-86 ' (NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE) ELEVATIONS ASSUMED DATUM 2' CONTOUR, INTERNALS 5' CONT01 iR INTFRVAI C RFTWFr-M TnP lRRTTnm Ur i sc r— JUN 06,2005 13:56 718 624 6905 Page 2 Robert Bohn =' Bohn Contracting P.O. Box 55 • Peconic, N.Y. 11958 (631) 765-1119 9 Fax (631) 765-6215 September 14, 2005 To: Linda Kowalski Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application for Variance Applicant/Owner: Geri Armine Klein Site Location: 160 Sound Drive Greenport,NY ADDENDUM to application„Part"A"Area Variance Reasons: Fact: Property is located at unattended beach. Fact: People use this area to discard rubbish onto applicants property Fact: People throw"used birth control devices, a/k/a Prophylactics on applicants Front lawn and property. Fact: People use applicants property to"relieve"themselves in all forms Fact: Fence is NOT intrusive to the view or access Fact: Existing 6' fence in applicants neighborhood. Res ly, Robert Bohn Bohn Contracting r M _ V7 For over 30 years we have been one of the premier forerunners i in the fence industry: Al'o1V Yif, (slag 0171) t1'•'< � �� I °Yap / G77araitteecl 100°%0 Co-Extruded Virgin PVC IFAg Construction. we tient Cowi, ue to Protect YOU a(7cl your fC7JT(IlV wHilY,,, - adding to the value nf', your home. W, t� .>�ta'-"•" � ,'r - i� 4: f' t{i +•y;' `�'e i, r,� _ t +e� i,': �'� ,� F• 7� g '1 r M1 � M1 � �q .`t:��rp.�' •�'� �� S � tli 1r � ~�'- "l F i 1{:�'� .rr �< .�� - �D 1 g s },`, .•I j�SiJ. 7 ,r `f\ ,. < � � F ''��; �„T F�F� y�`- �" t� `t j:. ri+ �tt �� g'� � � iealraaa.t' I�� i�a(ta4' \ t �0 •ya�(y( �. '� ii•i _ �� ' sr,t +- ,ro f �� ? �s __i, �! E?i�, Y 1` , •f, �I �; e'dt„=. F i',��'F �- �,',1 S1 '� !t / ;b`• t 'd { { 4� j� � _z�4 � 4`E ,l��! � ,���(t � '�•� S��C�F7 t'�r���1}� 1 I � � a E F e'-. •. ���� YIII1, E ,:, � `4n i�� '" ' ,t �`'- ;�j�;-j�I��.��`,t` ! �{k�;,, ;{ y �' t{� , �{ �+ 4a-" '•-!�. s.y«. )) i; �j ;t�.' !� t a+ �1, i; 'j- !£,'it.�. -,{�1 A- A .p, W. 04 r}'�tE x''5.4�.7'g I.E�'� �tt �; S F�� ,t' � ; .`".F r t`�• - y,T iV b„ / /`/ •l � t3 i'4l ;t�•,t S�� �<ti' �,g,�.��;,�}r'r•�' j' E' V ,!' '2''i�'- '�`�r"'r�`��.-'✓ ^�-,�".�`,•,k�,•'�=• .� ' 1j,,li•�,.�u 5� 'ate._ � �: _ "'�, � I �pS i �`s 1' 2 1' g t� t• rt.; _ f E.FM`s '/ --'4''�:ry'tiz`i-. 't vt •. ':',: `� ,� � [5, ��F l�lH �� .;n�xc�.<�`^.s�f`,. ..�:.:',;,;�•,_,'.F'fawt�T�r•'t.;-'��= *�s�t-.;^- ``:'_ }, -F! -t%-�'�" �L :;��:<:i'..r�g e;." •Ch:.r•.ti9'-'ry'.rra.,..'4 a.1�`-'•<�.++',;:�,t'.y,,yJ'. f •e. ,t.,1, fy,... i rj `-''ti=ur'fi'^`�*�'•-`a:.. `„`,z: ''f,-"='�'_t '='^'ri •r y"';E;r'}.'y.`_ ` �� - E ?,s� FS� Jx• ;s:T'�r,'='E, ,,<,7.`�. ;.. `-"s.;•,,'`"';-:'� :^'.t-r=.a=;�?,' -''}i•.�4?��� -•.",y� RE1 37`�{,„.yt r" l v '+�?nfle z,:`n"a�.:'_`r_s 3�f`.:-�";�:;-t;t ;;..�4•,'4..r•,: g_,. . F�;= s{ •i{ ��-A` t i� t-•M1• ire �,3� 4;.e y`+, rt� 1 ( �v ,✓���•��' 'J 1,x 1 •� - {A�„`�4' f.•.., 'S^�''_ai.`_p�7.t..y��<�j:-6."Y.S'y>'Yi y'''�U,^�1=" �_4 3, � - t -i���J�'' �� FSS. x a t�-tai �•�+ .`-Yh ti_:'"."x_ ' �1 •;�is '�J'�. •C; z.�pv�•'�` �};•7' -yrs .{'. � 'r�'�F= :"'�1; `�'a�St"'�-�:'$. •4, S_!. t„ + ;4}.. • ,•, ,tea,-�r'P,>r `1' .Sr ry.rt'{1�.,x.l�S'l it i. tS�ypS Y �-"',a'f?-���:•�}y-�'� .y_4,3 2'�. ''t: ~645 .= �,`t,.. J-,, r t� rS ci�"S ti•. t,x !` t s"°�p. M6 (u ^ t=._.rFr��� '�-•-y �t'r,,:,.•;,-et'� a y,=rr../ 5'��«,may.: �-- a h v l�ti`.�=,i�'•-.7•}'�171�o�V�oil'lu'ol.l�l'E"�i� /-ftt�.l-.^ �`_',� 'tn.s"•� �e .Ygf•.'.eyf }-t'10".._' �^f-b,k, '"4 ht C' A ;`.g c, t' f:'�➢ 1'.T s •�*r?. ':.rs..':;.,.^y•QM a 'y FI°�-,.�:"f'., 'S c x,'�•rS:'-..��.t ,'�:�;ar _'-L�'!;� .,+° .tyl`•�r;,�•, r ,, ma'r�y�'',s�yles colors - :dr r !> r••..,,. t,r`t�.y "' _` ! Y•'L�`-�.r�7;°'x:. ra r, �^?.7�rr�• ��'..�+�°- �a�rx's.''r,�}". tr.r�` �':�' t}h�=:ii:.��`•��,e Wiz' :-t•.'ti:yf�. , :�s. i.�F�a"�✓"C,i.F,! ij,s�i.- =:S;i�;i'�•i+Y: xis"�, �trr".i��-rx;, t� +1::�.. �,r yrot^ - �� .<'�•-y,;:, s'r:,;S�{'S� sa;7 ; [:;C63 i.;;r�'�t r;Y.",;=:�r as�'`Yvd'i,,.';S.Ldl,�y-�111�6J1Y;' �, .,i� j 'y,:�:;y?f, �`;:�' .�s'';•.�"�','�c `a.e r-,.,:��i;�#a,ui+ .] .�eS�jTt�S_.'r.� T.�t,.T "t`{�:� �.°`"�1� t: �`a�;x'�;i��. t'n'�7' d,t_'��'f;t'u; c, ��.. _ ,,,,,,}������%'..-,, ,i`•r �sry�Y, "'l.,s �.- •7 .. .�„� ti�y' =x_,Jt�'irr:; q�,.,'.. �,. 'Y*r S' 3't}�',q ,4"'e r Y�`' '%�,�'r' r' ;',y�xr 'st"nrrE' ;a`/L-`_-`k,'i „L�`rtF'.*'ia,.'c4"<'f''i',%� .`.r a t- :. x' '>r,v-+; �^•y,,.t` �; l'(A R9 ace a��('y '-`yfY�:.;ft:�}`t e;;•3ro.,!rti`ai�.,:}���".�:�-'�-••'�'�:??.�y,q•:-� �•i�'�ifs. •�' _ L'>:+y*>,,t��,•j ��y_LTJ{ •�-i".mac - Se-- 9i. _.T.R`.;r.�:-�.. c a/G•;r�`=r�}]6ii�:�1y�.17 �•v,Y+;.:t; �'-tii:r' A��SEJI'' `�'u�3a. '�S{", •u?' e, t.irk• .A.- Jr:-f.s y>+�`�ti�'.`s.-.R -,YJ {•fltllEll{�!I{!It•!l�'���'� �� illllltllillllllillllll {Iill �•��'��I��fltfljfi(��������,tl�:f t °I.1�111'{:1 I.:IYi:iWi li lY{ { i.1 lYl (tl:l}� ��=iaa.iii,E:E �� isrui�t:}I�i.;ltr C•1ttJC•�L+IC•�C•!C•�C�]C�7C•�C��C��C• � o r ' iii •i� --'+r 7�---^i';ail.) �:�-;.♦•��=�� i.;=rte= Lei•+♦,., •+••..'�♦�,♦•r� • ♦, • '•� ♦•.,•♦'yy, .`ter .h.. �. 'Lc }K`. ♦st*, ,. k', .r^ 1 UI`I'iilillf111111'lllllilillll�l'I'lil'I IIIIIIIIDIIIINIItllill f IIIII'rIIIII IIIIui:1 nnnt�itUuitu'uiiitill�Il VIII IIIIIi(IIIIII(LIII(1(III( � ll l 11 11 l I lll(IIIIIIII(Ill�i(I( a _ (t1tlrl�It1(111"�Iilt'ItIililtl�Iil�Ti'I9 Itlili`kltl�tltlil:i�lilililil3�li t(il'il �1�1�6�1�1�1�1��1�I►�h�61►1�1��I�I�I�II W ; , ����������������������������►����������� � � IIII ( I(Iill I�IIIIIILIIIILII( 11111(I�I�IIIlIII�IIII�ILIIILlI�III 111111 r , 42/ Geri Armine-Klein 65 Montague Street 3D Brooklyn,New York 11201 (718) 624-6905 (917)974-4492x° Decembei Ms.Linda Kowalski / Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Southold,New York 11921 RE: Application for Variance Applicant: Geri Armine-Klein, Owner Site Location: 160 Sound Drive Greenport,New York 11944 Dear Ms.Kowalski: I am the owner of the property and house located at 160 Sound Drive,Greenport,New York 11944. The property is a corner parcel flanked by Sound Drive, Sound Road and the Long Island Sound. To the East of our property is the Town Beach known as"67 Steps". We started to occupy the house last December,2004. For the next 6 months I observed the traffic flow and activity along Sound Road and the parking area for 67 Steps. From early in the morning until the evening there is a steady flow of traffic on this road which goes past my house. This beach is heavily used by the people of this community. Many walk to the beach and many drive and park alongside the road flanking my house.Many people drive down to the end of the road to sit in their car and have a cup of coffee or watch the sunset. Many cars and trucks drive to the end and reverse themselves immediately,apparently they made a wrong turn. Since we have occupied the house I have cleared at least 5 huge bags of trash a week from the shrubs separating my property from Sound Road.This length of road alongside my property extends for 400 feet. I found drug paraphernalia, a liquor stores worth of bottles and beer bottles, and used birth control devises. In the parking area people would empty their car ashtrays, dump garbage and break liquor and beer bottles.Needless to say,this was disgusting and upsetting. Since the town was not cleaning up this parking area,I undertook to do it myself. Although I was concerned about the traffic and the litter problems I did not intend to install a fence until I observed the drug dealing activity in the parking area of 67 Steps. I then became concerned with the safety of my children and my property since criminals were hanging out next to my house. I would observe a car parked the"wrong"way,meaning not looking at the water view but with the tail end of their car to the waterside. Then there would be a series of cars that would drive up alongside the car,have an interaction, shake hands,then the"visitor"would leave. On several occasions I called the Southold Police to report that drug dealing was going on next to my house. By the time the police would respond the drug dealer would be gone. This happened on many occasions. Geri Armine-Klein 65 Montague Street 3D / Brooklyn,New York 11201 (718)624-6905 I (917)974-4492 ERIEEC �` [December 1,20055 Ms.Linda Kowalski9Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall 2 Southold,New York 11921 RE: Application for Variance Applicant: Geri Armine-Klein,Owner Site Location: 160 Sound Drive Greenport,New York 11944 Dear Ms.Kowalski: I am the owner of the property and house located at 160 Sound Drive, Greenport,New York 11944. The property is a corner parcel flanked by Sound Drive, Sound Road and the Long Island Sound. To the East of our property is the Town Beach known as"67 Steps". We started to occupy the house last December,2004. For the next 6 months I observed the traffic flow and activity along Sound Road and the parking area for 67 Steps. From early in the morning until the evening there is a steady flow of traffic on this road which goes past my house. This beach is heavily used by the people of this community. Many walk to the beach and many drive and park alongside the road flanking my house.Many people drive down to the end of the road to sit in their car and have a cup of coffee or watch the sunset. Many cars and trucks drive to the end and reverse themselves immediately,apparently they made a wrong turn. Since we have occupied the house I have cleared at least 5 huge bags of trash a week from the shrubs separating my property from Sound Road.This length of road alongside my property extends for 400 feet. I found drug paraphernalia,a liquor stores worth of bottles and beer bottles, and used birth control devises. In the parking area people would empty their car ashtrays,dump garbage and break liquor and beer bottles.Needless to say,this was disgusting and upsetting. Since the town was not cleaning up this parking area,I undertook to do it myself. Although I was concerned about the traffic and the litter problems I did not intend to install a fence until I observed the drug dealing activity in the parking area of 67 Steps.I then became concerned with the safety of my children and my property since criminals were hanging out next to my house. I would observe a car parked the"wrong"way,meaning not looking at the water view but with the tail end of their car to the waterside. Then there would be a series of cars that would drive up alongside the car,have an interaction,shake hands,then the"visitor"would leave. On several occasions I called the Southold Police to report that drug dealing was going on next to my house. By the time the police would respond the drug dealer would be gone. This happened on many occasions. � W e I would have preferred not to install a fence. I was very concerned about the aesthetic of enclosing my property and there are many other things I would have preferred to spend the money on then a fence. I remain distressed about the drug problem in Greenport and the drug dealing occurring at 67 Steps.I think this should be a high priority concern for the residents and politicians of Greenport.Until a comprehensive solution is crafted,all I can do is try to protect myself,my family and my property to the best I am able. I determined a tall fence was essential in order to provide a minimum of protection. On or about July 2005,1 entered into a contract with Robert Bohn Contractor's to install a fence along the Sound Road side of my property and to enclose the comer around Sound Drive. I viewed this fence as necessary for the safety and protection of my family. I also decided to install a very attractive fence,and not just a stockade fence, since I would be looking at it as I approached my house. This choice was a very costly decision but it seemed to be worth it since the appearance of the fence is very important to me. Mr.Bohn and I discussed many fence options and decided upon a 6 foot high Oklahoma style fence.Because of the criminal element in the neighborhood I did not want someone driving or walking by my house and property to be able to look into my house or onto my property. I wanted to diminish the opportunity for someone to view my children or belongings and think criminal thoughts. After the fence was installed the Town Code Officer notified me and Mr.Bohn that we were in violation of the Town Code because a corner lot is considered to be two front yards,and that a 6 foot fence was not permitted, only a 4 foot fence. Mr.Bohn said he would obtain a variance for me to allow the 6 foot fence which I paid for,to remain as installed. If I had thought I could only install a 4 foot fence I would not have wasted my money. A four foot fence is useless for the protection of my privacy and the safety of my family and property. Clearly,any person taller than 4 feet,which is most anyone over 8 years old, or sitting in a car driving along Sound Road would be able to see over a 4 foot fence. I would also like to record that as soon as the fence was installed someone sprayed"graffiti"onto a panel of the fence,thereby defacing at least$2000 worth of property. One Code Officer described this as"spiteful" which I think is white-washing an action that is actually criminal. Also, since the fence has been installed people are still tossing rubbish,beer and liquor bottles over the fence,apparently for their amusement. Outside the fence I am still picking up crack vials,pipes,empty liquor and beer bottles and throwing them in the trash. People walk their dogs and do not clean up after them,which is not only nasty but is also a health hazard. I have lived in Brooklyn,New York for 30 years. It is distressing to report that I I have witnessed more criminal activity and total disregard for personal property in the one year I've lived in Greenport than in my entire time in Brooklyn. As to the corner of the lot which is at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive,I also wanted a 6 foot tall fence so those driving up Sound Road to the beach would not be able to see into my property,for all the same reasons listed above. I now understand that this might cause a traffic visibility problem for people rounding the comer of Sound Drive. I certainly did not intend to create any sort of hazardous condition. However,I still want a fence that obstructs visibility onto my property,while not obstructing visibility for drivers rounding the corner. As per my telephone conversation with Mr.Mike Verrity, I could have enclosed the entire corner of my property with a 30 inch high fence that would extend 30 feet in each direction from the intersection. The fence could then increase in height to the permitted level for the rest of the length of fence. I decided this did not make sense for several reasons. First, it would not serve the purpose of protection since anyone can easily step over a 30 inch high foot fence. Second, it would not serve the purpose of providing privacy, since anyone can look over a 30 inch high fence. Third,it would be extremely unattractive to have three different heights of fence surrounding one piece of property. The only function it would have served would be a deterrence to the people who walk their dogs on this corner of my property and do not pick up after them. The dog walkers would then be forced to curb their dogs instead of allowing them to defecate and urinate on private property. Instead of enclosing my entire parcel,I decided to install a four foot high section of fence along the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by the two 30 foot setbacks from the corner of the intersection. I understand the regulatory objective of the town that there be a clear view from both sides of the intersection for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. That objective is obtained by the set back requirement of 30 feet. The height of the fence along that angled section does nothing to impede visibility of people at the intersection. However,a six foot fence at that angle would restrict visibility onto my property as people drive or walk North on Sound Road towards the town beach. Nothing in the towns interest is undermined by allowing this section of fence to be 6 feet tall. Whereas,my interest in protecting my family from opportunistic criminals who might look at my house and property while walking or driving up Sound Road is not served by a 4 foot fence. A 6 foot high fence on this angle would better protect my family and property. As to the section of my property which is outside the perimeter of the fence I would like the Town's assistance in posting signs. The Town should post signs that: 1. This is private property; 2. No trespassing is allowed; 3. No parking is allowed on my lawn; 4. Dogs should be curbed and cleaned up after by their owner or dog walker; 5. No dumping is allowed. Individuals should not be under the mistaken impression that this comer of the property does not still belong to me just because I have not fully enclosed the corner. The Town Code does not have a specific"Poop Scoop"provision,though Chapter 38,pertaining to dogs, states that the dog may not"cause damage or destruction"to other people's property. I view allowing a dog to defecate and urinate upon my property causes it's damage and destruction. I would like a sign posted for people to curb their dog or they would be in violation of this section of the Town Code. As requested by the Zoning Board of Appeals,I am also incurring the expense to resurvey the lot and indicate the fence as described on the survey. The new survey will be submitted by December 14,2005. I understand the hearing date is January 19,2006. I would appreciate being notified of the time that the hearing is scheduled. I request that the variance applied for be granted in full. I request that the frontage along Sound Road be viewed as a side yard which would allow for a 6 foot fence. I request that the angled portion of fence bisecting the corner of Sound Road and Sound Drive be viewed as a continuation of the 6 foot high portion of the fence so that the 4 foot high section of fence may be replaced by a six foot high section of fence. I request that the Town put up the appropriate signs at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive to protect my property from trespass and damage. Thank you in advance for your fair and prompt consideration of this application. Sincerely, — Geri Armine-Klein Cc.Robert Bohn Contracting Ms.Mary C.Gabriel and Ms.Adrianne Greenberg QUESTIONNAIRE �J FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A.APPLICATION A. Is the bject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ❑Yes No B. Are th e any proposals to change or alter land contours? ❑Yes No C. 1)Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? 2)Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? 3)Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none"on the above line,if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel and proposed use (exa pl exis n le-farmly; proposed: same with garage.) uthorized Signature and Date 2/05 —RANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FI [ APPLIC ,E TO OWNER, CONTRACT VENDE] .__TD AGENT: The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Variance Special Exception *Other Approval or Exemption from plat or official map Change of Zone Tax Grievance *If"Other"name the activity: Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage or business interest "Business interest" means a business including_a partnership,' in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or em to ment b a co oration in which the Town officer or em to ee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES" complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated: Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that persomd /^—!`7 Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant, agent or contract vendee) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 50/. of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director,partner, or employee of"the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submi d thi da Signa e: Print e: V� TOWN OF, SOUTHOLD BUILDING :MIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do)' ave or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey www. northfork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Examined • ,20 Contact: Approved ,20 Mail to: Disapproved a/c s 15Coa►L 11SJ Phone: X, " 145 Expiration ,20 1 .. -act iJ/ { Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT MELD �l Date 0 , 20 O'S INSTRUCTIONS a.This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 st is of plans, accurate plot plan to'scale.Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to,the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (Sign tureof�applicant or name,if a corporation) • b v �.CbJJt L �1�s� (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Name of owner of premises tf12 1 y{� (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. "Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on whichroposed workwil be done: a Sts 1�U eg.&Pr Ott House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 33 Block "Lot Subdivision AIA Filed Map No. Lot (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy i, emises and intended ase and occupa> >f proposed construction:,, a. Existing use and occupancy 3 b. Intended use and occupancy 3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work Ee&&�-e_ /orlon 0 . (De ription) 4. Estimated Cost Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial,or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Fear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. .Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO 13. Will lot be re-graded?YES NO__Z�ill excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO 14. Names of Owner of premises Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF,� being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) ove named, (S)He is the - - r,Agerit,-Corpofate Officer;etc.)-- of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to re me t 's b day o 200 (� Notary Public re o 'cant BARBARA ANN RUDDER Notary Public.State of Now York No.,135:.805 Quaiiiied;••Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14, , PROJECT LD NUMBER SEAR 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—Project Information(To be complete by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1.Applicant/Sponsor 2.Project Name 3.Project location: Municipality County 4.Precise location(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide map) S.Is proposed action: i ( )NEW ( )EXPANSION ( )MODIFICATION LTE ION 6.Describe project briefly: z z 7.Amount of land affected: Initially: acres; Ultimately: acres 8.Will proposed action comply with exlsflng or other existing land use restrictions:( YE ( }NO If No,describe briefly: 9.What Is present land use in vicinity of project:(describe): ( )Residential ( )Industrial ( )Commercial ( )Agricul ral ( )Park/Forest(Open S' ce ( )Other 10.Does action involve a permit approval or funding,now ultimately from any other Governmental agency,(F eral,State or Local)? ( )YES ( )NO If Yes,list agency(s)and pe it/approvals: 4 11.Does any aspect of the action have a current) valid permit or approval? ( )YES ( )NO If Yes,list agency( and permit/approvals: ws 12.As a result of proposed action,will existing pennittapproval require modification? ( )YES ( )NO If Yes,list agency(S)and permit/approvals: I certify that the Informatlon provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date: Signature: If the act/on Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessme OF SO(/T�O ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE �� l0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK P.O. Box 1179 N REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS G Southold,New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax(631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER tel'' Telephone(631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Cum southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: October 3, 2005 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5793 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 5793 —Geri Armine Klein -Zoning Board of Appeals application for variance. Also included is application to the Zoning Board of Appeals; Area Variance reasons; letter from Bohn Contracting re: variance application; Notice of disapproval dated August 15, 2005;building permit application dated August 10, 2005; two photo illustrations; ZBA questionnaire; short environmental assessment form; applicant transactional disclosure form and survey of property. Town Of Southold P0Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/30/05 Receipt#: 4579 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 5793 $150.00 Check#- 4579 Total Paid: $150.00 Name: Armine-klein, Geri 65 Montague Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Clerk ID: BONNIED Internal ID 5793 ZBA TO TOWN CLERK CHECK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE: 09/19/05 ZBA# NAME CHECK# AMOUNT TC Dpi Reddington, Michael and 2985 $450.00 SEP 2 9 2005 5791 Helen (Foster & Vandenburgh) REc o I clerk South Id Reddington, Michael and SEP 2 9 2005 5792 Helen (Foster & 2972 $150.00 Vandenburgh) soutUFFYCORRI cleiric 5793 Klein, Geri Armine (Bohn 4579 $150.00 SEP 2 9 2005 Contracting) RCEIYOD Martin, James and -0- SEP 2 9 2005 5794 Denise (Patricia C. (paid under Moore) #5742) uth®ld 70wfl CleFk TOTAL $750.00 Thank you. and half bathroom (toilet and sink). construct,at property known as 13795 are not permitted in an accessory build- The reasons in disapproving the build- Oregon Road (right-of-way extending mg,and only one,single-family dwelling ing permit application are that the new from the north side of applicant's prop- is permitted on a lot.A Certificate of LEGAL NOTICE construction will increase the degree of erty),Cutchogue;GIM 83-2-10.16: Preexisting Use was`issued 7/5/2001 for THURSDAY,JANUARY 26,2006 nonconformance when located-ht less (a) barn (building #1) at less a single-family dwelling and"accessory SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING than 3 feet from the side lot line and less than 75 feet minimum principal build- garage with:livigg•space above*:'Loca- tion OF APPEALS than 35 feet from the front lot line,Lo- mg rear yard setback,- tion of Property:East End Road, oca- PUBLIC HEARINGS cation of Property:4185 Camp Mineola (b) additions with, alterations ers Island;CTM 4-7-3.3(part of Lot 3). NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pur- Road,Mattituek;•CTM 1000-123-5-26. to a nonconforming accessory garage The Board of Appeals will hear all suant to Section 267 of the Town Law 10:15-A.M'`GREGG and'KATHI (building#2),for the reason that the ga- persons,or their representatives,desir- and.Chapter 100(Zoning),Code of the ROBERTS•"45817. A variance is re- rage is not entirely in a rear yard,and is ing to be heard or desiring to submit Town of Southold,the following public quested under Sections 100-243A and extended into a front yard,and written statements before the conclu- hearings will be held by the SOUTH- 100-244,based on the Building Inspec- (c) two (2) accessory sheds,an sion of each hearing noted above.Each OLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF tor's October 6,2005 Notice of Disap- as-built and proposed, referred-to as hearing will'not start earlier than des- APPEALS at the Town Hall; 53095 proval of an application for a building storage container buildings#3 and#4, ignated above, Files are-available for Main Road, P.O. Box;1179, Southold, -permit ,concerning additions and/or in a yard other'thari the eode=required review during regular`business hours.If New York 11971-0959,on THURSDAY; alterations,to,the dwelling.-The reason rear yard. you have questions,.please 4o not hesi- JANUARY 26;2006: stated in the disapproval is that the as- 11:25 A.M.MICHAEL and HELEN tate to cbn'6ct our office at(631)765- 9:30 A.M. JAMES NBLJMANN built enclosure-of an existing porch will REDDINGTON #5792. Request for 1809,or by email:linda,kowalski@town. #5822.A variance is requested under maintain a nonconforming front yard a Lot Waiver under Section 100-26 to southold.ny.us. Section 100-30A.3,bulk schedule,based -setback,increasing,the degree of non- unmerge,vacant land identified as CTM Dated: January 10,2006. on the Building Inspector's October 20, conformance at less than 35,feet from 1000-104-2-7.1, from the-adjacent va- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 2005•Notice of.Disapproval concerning theifront-lot line.'Location of Property: cant land identified as CIM 1000-104- RUTH D:OLIVA,CHAIRWOMAN ; a building permit application to amend 2545 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue; 2-7 2,based on the Building Inspector's 7706-1T 1/12 Peznmit No.31483=Z for co' nstruction,of, -CTM,1 0Q 5-1, : August 23,2005 Notice of Disapproval - - - : , GERANE KLEIN its determination thaf•the proper- anew dvelng.whiclwiexceed the 1D:20;A.Iand eodelmitationof 2-112•stoies for`pfo-' #5793:A variance is tequested under ties have been merged pursuant to See- ' f3l'946are-le$ti;of;space above Sectipn,,',00,'231, bas ed°on%,the-Build- tion 100-25:Location of Property:Cor- the second floor and code-compliant ing Inspector's August 15,2005 Notice ner of Horton Road and Bittersweet stairs,at 750 Millload,Mattituck;CTM - -of Disapprdval concerning a request Lane,Cutchogue,containing 63,808 sq. 107-1-1 - for,approval of a fence shown on the ft.as merged.Zone District:R40 Low- 9:35 A.M., TIM •TRUJILLO and 12/1.3/05-survey,as-built,prior to recent Density Residential. PAULA DANIEL #5830. The Appli- changes. The fence exceeds:the code 11:45 A.M.BARBARA and KIMO- icant-Owner requests.a Special Excep-- - .limitation of four feet when located in NO THERMOS'#5825.A"variance is tign to establish an-Accessory Apart- the front yard,at 160 Sound Avenue and requested under Section,100-244,based, ment-withm their existing single-family Sound Road, Greenport; CTM 33-4- on the Building Inspector's October 20,• 1 building as provided by-Section' 10U='ll- 35.2.-Zone,Distri7dt:-1240 Low-Density' 2005 Notice of Disapproval,amended 31B;subsection 13 of the-zoning cdde. ,:k Residential:,,,..;. ,• December 8,2005 concerning an apple- Lbeation'of'Property: 580 Soundview; :"iO'45 k.M,EDGEWATER II,LLC catipn for a building permit to demolish ;Avenue,Pecoitic;CIM=74 2 6•;_;'•' _ : #5$LS.:Atvariance is-requested-under an existing dwellingaud construct a new JOHN`imdNINA WIhI S'ctidp-100--30A3;bulk schedule,based -dwelling with setbacks at less than the IEI (Owner:iVIA TINE,INC. #5809 " on'the Building Inspecto'r's October 19, code requited 10'feet on a single side ?t�ariances'are•requested,uridef Sections -2005 Notice of Disapproval concerning -and less than 15 on the second'side yard, 10,0 33 a- 1Q0=239.411(1),based on the` a request.to-amend a building-permit, at 355 Sound Beach,Drive,Mattituck; Building Inspector's October•7,'2005 -'and requesting variance relief exceed- CTM 99-1-19. i Notice of Disapproval concerning an ing the variance limitations granted 11:55 A.M. JAMES and KAREN accessory swimming pool,proposed in a under Appeal No 5330 concerning the' HOEG#5821.A Variance"is requested f side,yard instead of the code-required •' height of a dwelling which irregular under Section 100-31A, based on the I front yard of rear yard,and in a location ioofline,exceeded 35 feet,at its highest .Building Inspector's November 1,2005 at less than 100 feet from the top,of the point and included a bedroom designed Notice of Disapproval-for-a-certificate bluff or bank of the Long island Sound. in space above the second-floor:This of occupancy to allow the existing dne- I .Location of Property:590-North View variance is for a third designs modifying story building to be used as a principal' Drive,Onent;;C]M 13-1-5.1. and expanding the floorspace above the office use,instead of an,accessory'•office , ',:9..,'5,0 Q M:THoIyIAS-LANDI#5816. second floor,exceeding the code hmita- in conjunction.ivith the former dwelling i requested under Section tion of 2-1/2 stories,-and modifying and use which was removed,at 15400 Main "T 244,.bAs 84n the Building Iris'pec- adding roof angles which'exceed the Road,Mattituck;CIM 114-9-1. tor's November 7,2005 Notice of Dis- code-limitation of 35 feet.Location of 12.05 PM PAT IAVARONE#5829. approval conceiving an application for Property: 63735 C.R 48 (a/k/a North A variance is•requesfed under•Section 1 a-buil 9 permit for a new•swimming Road or Middle Road), Greenport, 100-30A.3,bulk schedule,based on the pool,Which construction-will,iricrease CTM 40-1-20.2 Building Inspector's November 1,2005 the'building coverage of the lot in ex- 11:00 A M. JON and KATHLEEN Notice of, Disapproval• concerninf a• cess.of•the code's-20% limitation, at MARINO#5831.A variance is request- building-permit under #22830Z which 950 Wa"terview Drive, Southold;'CPM ed under Sections 100-33 and 100-242, restricted the use of the attic to',hon- 78-7-28• based on the Building Inspector's De- habitable" area An application has ­­9:55 A.M.SUSAN ROGERS GRUN cember 14,2005 Notice of Disapproval been filed for a building permit for the #5824.A variance is,requested under conceiving a building-permit applica- as-built alterations which modified the i Section 100-2394A(1), based on the tion to construct.an addition to the non-habitable attic area to hving space Building Inspector's November 15,2005 existing accessory,garage. The reason and converted•the floor above the sec- Notice of Disapproval concerning a for disapproving the builchng permit and story to a third story,"ex.ceeding the building permit apphcahon to construct application is that the construction will code limitation for 2-1/2 stories, an addition,for the reason that the new increase the degree of nonconformance '12 20 P.M. GEORGE and`ELIZA- construction will be less than 100 feet when construction will be in the side BETH IRELAND #5814.A,variance from the top of the bluff or bank of the yard area of the existing accessory ga- is requested under Sections 100-31A Sound,at 57305 C.R.48(a/k/a Middle rage,instead of the rear yard.Location and`100-242A, based on the Building Road or North Road),Southold;CTM of Property 10105 Soundview Avenue, Inspector's`September 26,2005 Notice 52-1-6. Southold;CTM 54-8-5. of Disapproval concerning a requested 10.00 A.M. PHILIP MILOT#5705. 11.10 A.M. TIMOTHY STEELE for a building permit to,construct an Variances are requested under Sections #5618 (Continuation from Variances addition and as-built alterations to an L� 100-33,100-242,and 100-244,based on are requested under Sections 100- existing accessory building with living the Building Inspector's November 21, 31A(2)(c) and 100 &zae -242A, based on space The reasons for disapproving the Lq 2005 amended Notice of Disapproval the Building Department's April 23, building permit are that the addition L U U G� concerning a proposed second-story 2003 Notice of Disapproval,amended will change the intensity of use,`increas- addition and alterations to the existing January 28, 2005, concerning abuild- ing the degree of nonconformity, and one-story garage,for a recreation room ing permit application for the following the as-built additions and alterations 't a'2 #7706 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Jean Burgon of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks, successively, commencing on the 12th day of January , 2006 Pri (Cal Clerk Sworn to before me this [? day of 2006 UPJ bflllS�VNA VOLINSKI WAO PUSLIC•STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01-V06105050 i�watmia 9 in Suffolk County ##phos February 28, 2008 ��3,7/ r ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT G_ kOF SIGN -� �n POSTING (Name of Applicants) Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as 000--1000- -----------------------------------------------------x ----------------------------------------------------X COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I,_ J?o b e_ t / }Bohn residing at V O 0 New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the _L_�'day o 0- G f Ab-0 I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon,securely upon my property, located ten(10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way(driveway entrance)— facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to that date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be 3&n aa r\/ a o o I (Si Sworn to before me this �3 day of Cin-- , 200 (Notary Public) *near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby. t ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK II -----------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINGS � (Name of Applicants) CTM Parcel #1000- -------------------------------------------------- 1000---------------------------------------------------- -X COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Ro n residing at t —Fh 0L<1 New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the /0 4-h day ofJ,' I personally mailed at the United States Post Office inc�L fhv j York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( )Assessors, or( )County Real Property Office �Z-6 t9 ,for every property which abuts and is across a public or priv�,',e street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) Sworn to before me this 13 day of �� , 2004 -- - -- -- - - --- —- — - - - 00 C.a o (Notary Public) Ln i PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or �, - caner names�and addresses fvr whi h atfe r ,I Gfi t � ' :ii! UNIT IX 4971 cp Postage $ ru Certified Fee 2,40 postmark C3 1°$5 Here 0O Return ReoelPt Fee KK��� (Endorsement Required) clerk.. 1 C3 Restrtoted Delivery Fee ,0 (Endorsement Required) 4m�4 Q1/13/06 '-71 Total Postage&Fees f II p Sent o ----- ------------- Street.Apt.No or PO Box No. e.......A�._`--- C--State,ZI +4 An. 01 - Nu- Tlt�, uF ' , tARINO The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall , 53095 Main Road, Southold: . 'AME : KLEIN , G . #5793 PIAP # : 33-4-35 .2 APPEAL : Height Variance r-EQUEST: As-Built Fence DATE : THURS . MARCH 30 , 10 :50 AM Jf you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . 'ONING BOARD=TOWN. OF SOUTHOLD 765- 1809 G, OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Office Location: North Fork Bank Building-First Floor, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Email: Linda.Kowa lski(aD-Town.Southold.ny.us Jayne.Martin(a-Town.Southold.ny.us (631) 765-1809 (ext. 5012 or 5011 during recording) office fax (631) 765-9064 VIA FAX 76 S-- G a-/ MEMO TO: DATE: RE: q- C-A6L-&t �C.e S A s --7 1Z 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition Materials Presented to Southold Zoning Board of Appeals a { 4 4.1 4 �v '� - ,.• { � r' fir �` _ �°..•" _ .^m.-t,�_ _, - i r+,'G�, x''FL' �. i• ,�.^ ��"'3..x..' s.r=T�37Z�f�i'Zf ti•� �.. ,`_� ":lx '" �+" �r6'b .amu�,.•�4��"'�d1�,�:�e��_:=;�_..•a��..,�i A S�.z���;�~�+• -'>,= ,�, � r,a. �'�'-;mss �:a.��'�f�,� ,��r,:.�'�- ��� � � ��• j - - ��]5 l+>,w� �r 1+,•;q., 0.x -�__�w'.,"-$�'3' r'�`� t-`�- G i ""�-`-=r�� ,�jka�.,�` .:s�`A ..d�s��,�.fS,.=�.�'��---��",s ��'�"r'�vn�,,,&,!✓-x' ",�"''� '� s qi ��d�: -- :� � ,�-=._tet, •��:�r -�----- _ �,_�-- - _ ➢= .r'3'�"T;,�,u`fir•-�- _ Fence erected at 160 Sound Road, Greenport, New York August 2005 26 January 2006 Table of Contents 1 67 Steps Nei hborhood Coalition r 1. Summary: Definition of 67 Steps Coalition and 2 purpose of attendance at today's hearing 2. Petition signed by residents and property owners 3 opposed/concerned to fence at 160 Sound Road including violation of existing Southold Town code regulations 3. Survey of fence provided by Robert Bohn 4 S� Contracting, Inc. with new issue concerning placement of fence on Southold property " 4. Letters from direct adjacent property holders with supporting photos of problems caused,, and photos of other sights in compliance with existing .;a Town Code ordinances 6 5. Additional letters from property owners objecting to fence and hazards/other issues fence has = created n 6. Addendum items since July, 2005 supporting community inquiries, complaints regarding fence and related hazards i }4 z r? n 3 Ig January 26, 2006 '� y br The 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition ti# The 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition is best described as an informal but well-organized group of property owners and residents of the North Fork who are dedicated to the preservation and equitable use of the 67 Steps and its beach. Its projects have ranged from involvement in limiting development density along Route 25A at the southern end of the neighborhood,to preventing the sale in 1989 of the Town property by 67 Steps, which has now become a memorial and park. It is a group that has worked closely with Southold officials to ensure that they dedicate as much time as possible to matters in the area, and is working to expand its efforts to better enforce issues of continued concern to ;< the residents. The neighborhood is best described as a walk-by, front-porch, "hello' 4 community, where boundaries of age, gender and status are put-aside. There are no officials, only those individuals who choose to take on projects as they wish to do so. Purpose of the 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition at Today's Dearing The Coalition represents individuals who have signed the petition and/or are here via representatives,who wish to show their objection to the fence erected at 160 Sound Road, and who want action taken to correct this situation. The attached materials include letters of objection from the owners of the three adjacent properties whose homes directly face the fence, additional letters of protest from nearby E neighbors, and a petition signed to date by over forty neighborhood residents. K t # �h t 67 SiMs Neighborhood Coalition Petition of objection to fence height at 160 Sound Road G petition is signed by residents in the neighborhood of 67 Steps, and those concerned with the lblems caused by the fence between Sound Drive and Sound Road meeting 67 Steps. ugust;2005,a fence was erected under the direction of the owners of 160 Sound Road,which 5 tween Sound Drive and the end of Sound Road ending at 67 steps in the township of Southold, . The solid wooden fence is currently at a height of six-to six-foot six inches from ground level ?' g its length of over 380 feet- The height of this fence is in violation of Southold Town code, ch stipulates no fence,walls or ibenn can be erected in excess of four feet along any frontage Perty line(Chapter 100,Article 30111,Sections 100-231 & 100-232). gust 15'h a letter of disapproval was sent to Geri Klein at 160 Sound Road by the Southold dings Department. To date,no known action has taken by the property owner to comply with letter. �petition demands that in the least the height of the fence be reduced to the four foot level. ! The fence creates a blind corner at Sound Road and Sound Drive,creating a dangerous traffic hazard to cars and pedestrians. • The fence creates a fortress effect along Sound Road,not in keeping with the more open view standards set forth by Southold Town. • The fence in its current structure has attracted graffiti and increased littering on the F' beach road side at the top of 67 Steps. Southold Town should not bear the extra burden of addressing this problem. he signatories of this petition demand that the fence comply with Southold Town ordinances. e demand to be notified and attend any hearing that tabes place if an application for variance is ped by the owners at 160 Sound.Road. ned : e Address Date ( 610J— PF 0J 4 r= f 14 i� i 'L Petition of objection to fence height at 160 Sound Road E�"Z J-1 s-I C5 Ol Iyo- & I- aDb f q a, 246�J- cation of property: 160 Sound Avenue, Greenport,NY unty Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 33 Block 4 Lot 35.2 eturned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: 4. 1 e ro osed constriction is not Vennittedpursuant-to Article XXIII Section 100-231 which states "Fences walls or berms may be erected and maintained subject to the following height limitations: A When located in the frontyard of residential zones, the same shall not exceed four feet in height. e proposed ftODt yard fence measures 6 feet. on i e to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require t er review by the Southold Town.Building Department. 5 �k file, Z.B.A. i r� �oz FORMER �v EASEMENT V ' f. a•- f-ENcE 15 L- a ,t-MD p�r-F�- T PcL0969TY AS mUCI PS 4J ca ? — ; tCS � t b *-q tl t � *i r 97. P .JQ i 8 F LE 5�.7 • 00 ARI vil Fi. S4 r� S i Carl F. Krebs 66 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 25 January 2006 Re: Fence at 160 Sound Road Greenport Members of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals: I am writing to you as a long-term community resident, an adjacent property owner, and a registered architect with over twenty years of experience on site planning issues, to express my strong objections to the fence erected last summer across the street from my home on Sound Road. I have worked on the design of perimeter fences and walls for many projects, including several US Embassies and Consulates, and I have had to respond to fence setbacks and height ` requirements when local zoning and codes prohibit standard solutions. In my professional practice.it has never been acceptable to build non-compliant structures with the expectation that a variance could be obtained, and to rely on the resulting existing condition to reinforce a claim. sro It is my strongly held opinion that the fence along 380 feet of Sound Road is an aggressive and insensitive intrusion into this neighborhood, one which is completely out of character with this established and collegial community. It has immediately attracted graffiti and has diminished the quality of life for all of us who regularly visit the 67 Steps Beach. My house,which was built 75 years ago with its principal exposure facing the street,presently confronts a blank six foot high wall,reducing the quality and value of its site. In addition,after reviewing a.copy of the property survey, it also-clear that this fence has { .Y been erected welloutside the property line and extends into the public right of way of Sound Road as-much as seven and a half feet on its southern edge. The closeness of the fence to the street has only exacerbated our concerns about visibility and pedestrian/vehicle safety. This fence is not only non-compliant in terms of height,but it does not even follow a straight line,and wanders well into Town property. There are many code compliant alternatives to this fence which will provide the owners with privacy and not destroy the green and gentle character of the Sound Road. Just two examples a of many in Southold are at Horton's Point and on Bay Home Road. There, owners of water front property at dead end beach roads obey the Town Code and have installed hedges and Plantings to provide privacy. In a recent tour of similar beach conditions, I could find no precedent for the fence erected at 160 Sound Road anywhere in Southold Town. The Town of Southold has adopted a code that does not allow high walls and fences to be constructed along the edges of its public roads, and this code has allowed the Town to safeguard its architectural heritage and natural landscape. The Board must uphold the code and disapprove the fence at 160 Sound Road. To do otherwise will establish a precedent for other beach roads throughout the town. Sincerely A � Carl F. Krebs AIA x 3 1 1-47—y - A 717- T A C ,� fi-41 -ON ZX Planted Hedge Buffer at end of Bay Home Road,Southold with Public Access to Beach g t , Z- ;J" f77- Ty Jt- ? ie Landscape Screen at End of Light House Road,Horton's Point,Southold Adjacent to large parking area similar to 67 Steps parking lu $A , 4, Founders Landing,Southold,Public Parking and Private House `J IL -0 Rocky Point Road,East Marion,Public Parking,Houses on Both Sides 77 Kw- US �Iq South Harbor Lane,Southold,Public Parking and Adjacent House Kenny's Beach Southold,Public Parking and Adjacent House Hall `} Southold Town ' ,OPr,representatives at '.From: .The=Speleotes`Family V .1+?�.•, - - - •' -, -2006 :,v-,Date,', 3aniaary-?s, F; }; i I-ielpi,D6�hbt.irnperil our children who play in the street or our neighborsandvisitor blindspot _. take leisurely'strolls to the beach to view the water and sunsets,by app S ;i to~drivers:Although winter is upon us and traffic is slow; anyone familiar with the area kizows tlaat�the summer bring,visitors and neighbors who either walk or drive, an r. ;,; 1 • cliildren'wha skate or ride their bikes to the beach. The potential for someone getting ' f injureci,existsand cannot be ignored. ; °.r a,traffic,study conducted so that the town can be indemnified,protecting the town's i, „t�;�. • co£fers'and�ta�.payers,vvhen a vehicular accident results in injury? Should we be naive to _. k the'fact that we live in a litigious society, and when(God forbid)an injury or possibly r deaih`occu't-we hat corner that'the driver along with the owner's of the fence and the t ,town thaf approved the variance for its existence won't be involved in the law suit? Sh®ul'd'we,igriore'the fact that taxpayers will ultimately pay the price? 19, ' Ail our neiglibbrs have discussed this installation for quite same time. Some are area Y; ,,,,. contiactors'�or construction trades people as well.Na one in the neighborhood t understands'h6W the legal process was allowed to be ignored. - Althou }i welaould be wrong,we understand that: peimit was never applied for,paid for nor issued by the town• . _ That this variance process is taking place after the questionable installation. is thj`,,6w that process•is normally conducted? We,understand that the installation violates the town's own established codes. , 4;) We were told that the town did not issue any violations for such a breech. W Several,disturbing precedents appear to be fighting for legitimacy. 1,)Jt:e idents do not'need permits. f`' 2.) Eriforceri►ent does not exist. 3.)" Safety is not a'concern. As;anal,hote; e live a democracy and once a variance is granted for a tall stockade perimeter fence whether whole or partial,how will the town be able to deny anyone from _ doirig,tlie.saine:in-the future?,Once the precedent is established a stockaded,fenced-in, ,' impersonal-town could-become'a'reality. Take the Hamptons for example were . edestri' feel unwelcomed b the imposing hed es that send a clear signal that visitors n' do'not-l;elnng here.",T—he Narth'Fotk has a warm charm and friendly spirit inviting visitors }, ;- and'i6i"hbors alike. Our e es should be ranted to view its beauty unobstructed while „ g _ Y g visitors;,neighbors, and children alike should be safe from vehicular blind spots. sy. x Tanuary:'25,2006 i iya �haY 'ir,_ V Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Ruth°°Ol ,� ®Box 1179 L 53905;=Ntain,R P }�S'buthbld;NY11971-0959 Dear;Ms.Oliva: Appeals to read this letter as a reference to what one average ,N`I{encourage=the Zoning Boar of exasperated citizen has gone through during a seven month period in resolving a problem. , This"response is_really addressed to our neighbor at 160 Sound Road,and is written after many = moriths:offrustration.' I feel-.that Ms:Kline bought and built at the end of a public road with full kn®wledge of what she ..r was�p'urchasmg Surely the care and attention that allowed her to select and design sucha 'ro'e clid'not revert her from thinking and inquiring about what happens on that road at P` p'' -'-,certainly,! p asked about such activities when we bought our house across from 160 nigh t.-,'We . 'Sound Road iia'I989. Of course it was'known as a bit of a"lover's lane". Our realtor as much as ;R.admitted:thaf when we,purchased our home. At many beach roads we looked at in the area,the s46ect•caine,up.,It's a gmalltown.Most of the kids are basically pretty good.Yes the beach gets F lies use during the summer months.And yes,not everyone is perfect with the trash. We do € vyA 3 , � t 4--".need toyliave'more trash cans and removal. But sincezthe'fence has,been erected,the trash problem seems to be worse. Perhaps those out there°just'think they can throw it against the fence barricade. However on two occasions the trash }` .. outside the fence Was left by the owners of 160. It may be convenient to put one's yellow bags out.for the`'weekend and forget about them,only to have them picked apart by the gulls• (I suggest 'hecking,with'one's neighbors on better ways to do this). Please see the attached photo on what y -''has caused concern on one occasion. By the way,there was no need to snap at our neighbor v'vhen`lie',asked'your to pick it up,and no reason for all of us to look at it for days,call the Sanitation Department,and wait six days for it to be picked up. Oui'neighbors'at.l'60 were informed that there was a bit of a drug problem at 67 Steps by ' neighbors while the house was being built,and we looked forward to working with them to ;p,f.;,, ",fiirther resolve,'this-problem.The Southold'Town Police have done a significantly better job in fY ., dealuig with this;brit I agree much improvement is needed. As you state in your letter tot e oning:136ard,0f Appeals,there are less than desirable individuals most likely conducting illegal ;activities,at thO;beach end. I too raised a son on the weekends at my house across the street with th L r e,sariie;aper"ehension. ,I 3'®u w®a�dtd av®r�with your neighbors and knock®�a their doors we :_ =e®ul�d.fedlY®aa•iv�c�t tv�heave done�a�ztA i�h�ag we are doing,and what we can�7®togethergoing fo�avarai' -be ®vea�-r`ecactda8��aaaci ba�dddiaa�case aad�d�raa��dy ineffective �'�eeaarity �cad� Ido not r understand-if you-are so distraught,why you have not fenced off your BIVTU property,not just r_•,�, ,- ,tlie;offending road?. You have no privilege more than any other of the families on the street with children who,'also play,in their non-barricaded yards. Why build a Berlin wall that has only d'esecrated the beach area,'created a negative backlash in the community, and set a less than a positive.note,as a'neighbor? ,I`am very sorryto see,this get off to this kind of start. Life is too short for any of us to have to write these kinds;of,letters: ;. Robe tori ,M1' yt ,✓.c' .",k, j• 1 '.�tk�_ .t;`� \,. •-drxe, `k• :it''i ix,!'r i x:. 'a`['r-i i�_`I{YA' 'i't` -f i ��C C�';�\ iF�f� ti��y/ #.,g y C.i'-��"<,,�••"��.+,�,�`i •:io. - C S ,1r y ���•,,.. �' '17 J '\_ � � t; �r �' _tL'^� .,y;t„' _�: _i',`f, •.a,.,,r �}} eaf�,,': t€s t'�,Y7�* ��� r l+�� _•Y;,t` 3��;• -'t`y .a' ^ri a:�;k"�{rz:s?Sr,};�S'�St�y 3F'R"_t,2'`'`1`' Er AN ��°' �Oil �s:F i\y",'.a'.•;.6„ #';•`.••�,s, 'k•;t',` - „r}' x t }'_.T;r• ; %n'M�=-`�<.'h - k=�h� 1f f' �§�.�. -'. •�.<<� ,�r;.,y •i y�-. �"j:-_:, 1��d,' �. ;i-` ''*c•,fi,� g t � =r"a*.h 7' ,%ik<rt.`�.J,.?'#<<•ror t+'19, ..'?4 -'x._... r •_ ry ti'j; r,; .a ,, ;��_'.G :��S> :v� � _ 1 w 1 '� :�•� �` �` �. '3r4,r }�.. Y#�,+ ,� t /, T •G-A9J �iir.Fr(_v# d,.-"a..` �, �: `Y,' eri'tfi:�s4.�'ers�'L x,��*�.-?,t t+,a. �.�,,`s.. •'1;�," �-.t...:�j, ti�` -,.->' a-s w"�y-' �`�, ��:. �'".�.G�; �;<'-'�:'���€'.z`�(k�:,.,'�;g.1'',;�:`�`-=�;�"`��;f�,.;2y`'�»,a:. <3+��3A-w. _ -r!•, �:�.f`i;s:�- �'; .��A>'.' s,��"' �, ,. a��5 t., - iC?3",,.^.' -e�, '�•iYt ,.W(�. Y'S.LY, `,yii.y �-_•. x j���b`^,,aiSv ,:€ ,: "?_ +�Y ..? `'R;0.i5-s1�.ice ^ y-7 '3=-3t. (r•=;•'* --�'`aS, x..'4., `5-- `• tx'ryt«r -=,' 'r �'.'`F'1;=�i'' ,; .s-,;{ 4>'•�, r* j a "4,'`,`'";#1.,<k"=-:ys.C 'iy'^-' a_ #� -:.., ' 1�'��� tvkl ie �'� � --rr rx\ .3 5�4'�=' 3. "�'�: •Y':1 E` t'�:,�� `�'�.%. "* "�; i�;' 7� �. �+ .r- POST- MA ��' ' ,,:?•'r 1R - -- `;=-. fi-:`:"ri�r:"•"e.,.:,'-`q=„'''��":,.- ....- =`a,.„y4:•,;,.. rs "?` ,xi ';Tti.: h,E.o"'��..,.:. ^-'�`_'c ;.q. ..�;<; _ _ %,.�_,}.,��yi��is�t"tiY;;r..'�•- - .:y s�7:-iu- r'ih•'#�R"�'�i7 '=-��-'tea-^ .r4 ¢E` -,4 "^t; t•�1��•#�;"-.i:fii i. � f �s '?5r_`9',�"y;�-if�'2�6-}`�'-_��.__.s�::'�.,f�-�,`,..,�k't t ..&. �gt� 7X '�" "�',����`.-'h ,�'> i�, R. r, i j - - - s r13• 5C P =n- ,r 4$ `? q ^t'3t,,r.s iiia i•f b."' �-' " rfi »•+ s _ 'tf �r 3 s7 Y,y�+ T' -. A - d,S`�r?'t� '. 4 -xw = 'r4H ate• dv 's"ga [j. .-< Zai -•^£-i'r'p �5k e s z:,;e `t1 `f i",-r <# ><' '` 'a r k"' C- .$+-y, yp+,r' •.•.,�. � r .::. i ,t„ ROUT nor '�c'`4' '� ",s,HI r,>v '� � a� '~;gam'""'' �'-d ` Y�;.w�°'�,•t* 2';,:.{�.^: �� � �. az^�'* �-,� -� ~.. _ 1X F- S OR m- 102 °7 LO rye sa u'r '^} +` --los 'g tis.. , AMI ,} F_ t•-' y a a:d - •�,<ry," a�r ` t ,, '°r.bis t'`a`k s fi� ;:,,nA?r F _Tymmw "Aug g ,' r k + "a'::<:3•' +!�'-} _ ri- - 4. 3` s lq `k, § ,....vs #a ,F.`,r•3,,,"..e..�t r._ .t.,t„-'.”; ,,•t yr,t7+' -=-'�' t G a f� i;-,P➢=taken 21 January 2005 �Tw°'fir 5 I `�'�•0`. _ -� ;s�.;""^s,<'-ys{;s,�»-.;r. �a": yam,:;.-- �'<�-b "s�° '.^,'rg�e•e_m;,,�^A,�,:,»^' ::.'�P< ; rt. Ws •tt �.t`,' •:�: + }r,-^ sm2;,srt�t.;v k� ta'x- `5 UPS jinx ... r t E•i{{,,, 0", '.:. `.i.i P�:,F �} ,.'k"i:s}.ia.# k..4; .Y +,.•Y ,^.,s ,,,j, {:$.ro"`ttr '' - ,fir .(+ .ra S�, >r�.°�}X,`�:• z3" rr j.'}r,�,i,i .S' �'��Y:i..r'e k�:y�'.C,..s,"kr�_i _ .Fr K��. j,✓+..�.,;eS'.k.-�=a- 1 n�;^:�{'s r`*�r�':r�-�s�'3.a-, •� ry^;i;�4Y .Y,...>-<.:'-;���'� A p � p ��- t�rr.•'k" ,x a.y�+ . v by -,+b:' ':; e.,'- ... '�'•,;,n;•a;. . '-. a ;.74 r>, ;t+-^_ �{5'..�.`-_;5t w ',.d,"'•>sr' •` a',u'•'$'.: - ;;� r, ,- _a.q`jp -a. .s�?'34r:':';.T�:;,., , - zi�, +�,.. ;t€, '3.. ,F. 'a'`-yt, &,.'-.-�'-"u�4.+:�,a tfst..'n .�'�' uR• 'a;rz?:1'`.-{v{k'zE;-`- "h::, '':�I.:,, .;Y` `�';.'„#`--^',i�S'-',3 ~��_ ,},. .�tyy*:fir�; ��r:'- etK: t',..q„3,x+.-,�.- w.'•�, ,,c,$}": f a?•gt ,�,t-'" gs x'°::S,r.x�.'`%.„Y:°'•1-'`,:L'-� - .C� T",i. -0 r 'm , ,k; Jq, �'x,'`:$•:a ,•,'. -,kK`.r .� if:' `y' -'+_e'�[},'.r €;i,- ,T �,` Ts;a".;.14•r�'a� '�'�' A•��_� ::rry:>a,.r�'�•;�5',,.;� ' - ;,'.as. i"-2Y'#}',: •,p„?��-� `� r'`�i�i"y.r.eKy�, �iv=`%( ^="t e8s:•,:��'i.`:°.*P� -r,. :p; .•a, ,. own .•Sn,,.a.„,. ;a}, t'4�; d 1 -0-0—V „$i• ';abT4e,.,;>'->v”,-, - .,7�;;� $rot,f �';�:•,,".s. '#4 r "� `" 'i �: x•F:.i`- `. _ ('',s.S.°..# '< - _ -";fie- ,a?=,' .v'�Y xf. .:ay �.:•'�i.-. gyS,a, .='✓`4si".4'"`i: ,3.y::^��"u�"Loa`:d. �'' a�fi'�"+x ..✓i'9�, ngp?+• �'.�{`S.. ..r}°< � ,.,5.:..::. i4.,F,'<'-. '$t ti'a :.ri,irr yV...i„`.•.�G 'Sy. ;. ­v^u..m ,j> 'i.:.i.,`- =-r�`�'-' =:',s.la•r `i-r`��`P':: ;ta'xa�.,a�:i:��,s t�,,.F•5�:�'_,'.:'ra+aY_-.3:5,,s- 1,t-,eta, °�:; +.,�=.- 'v d'i.:., ,,.�` '; .-' 4":'�;.'s -a';''#kx:e,:C�i;: - `Ef:' c";°:,- -,.�,. '=`a.," - - - ..:.,s^.; :.k`,'+''-•'' t _�;;^r•� ,�.�:. r�:�- .g. :.qa �' ;G,r.Y``�'.�..:; - 7f_;�p:��;�,.s,4.k'':s.�•,,, !,1.,,:�.;r'Y eJ`a.,��,5���:�•.,,._,+;-3#,' :< 'pr-��_4-t a.,'�t:.r wit ::i=s.+,tc=:,'<.,A.o.s�,,:,-y=.ar+,:.:�°""c +'.,3' :�` :-•,fi:v � `�.,�i..,J�, 1c�3`Ft a �`--sa - :; � 'f'> `r3.a,.ei � ,t,� --ra ?,�..: 4 °tea t * '' ,..r ii•;,mow:. Yazoo -=-----.T *cw;[k,`x,d „Ef:. ;, .•a3 z3• ._ ;:T. 8 - S:.z:„ "�'--d SR rv�),' Rre y F3�`„"^.-,�°s�T,'-,-.;,..""'-^ 'a�",” F:9: "�`,a;�^�;;�J 3s -Y'r,�.;Ee: .•tea,-�?�,,_cc �"•,�R'+"3r';^='e'er u .. i�L�»� _ .'.�«` Vi.'µ.. �_ a _ ,,..`#r '� zk` ,.T.+ `N -,g gu _ - -; --'ice �;;;`_•'...'�.•r" ,'�=".�a�z:.. 7aayM1--: - - ,yv�_: �. �u s,H•:.,'"::�i' .3-s=:.,.a�.y,.:aFr?:,<.::qL-:.'- a �.i.='` sve• :_.: - ':6T L �y'� :s�t�5-l,'`,%i�s-.�y'�•r-•,'r`-�`��sa� sc r ;3 - �•:•$a:�a%:^xe, ER fi07, x;` $'., .dr -•¢' .,? y r x -Y- _' - -,:-•_ x- ^+� .Yc"_ .'--�� x -r'".a y`.c „¢.• - `'�^Y.�, �. - #� ``t' +�, vTr'� , ^ r A'L'u ;Uri attend`ed`Garbage from 160 Sound Road _.j` November 25, 2006 Ol�ivaf::-"Y-,'�:�,''` "., . e-Cha r�voinaij;& ithold,Zoning Board of Appeals ;53095 IVlain Road,_P.O. Box 1179 4 Squtlold_ N:Y: 11971 n I would,tlike`to'comment on some of the matter Ms. G. Klein raises in her December `OS :::.4 v to 1VIs: Kowalski: In her letter,Ms. Kline repeatedly insists that she is distinctly ,•:Wsaustified,..,iri`maintaining her excessive height fence'along Sound Road,near 67 Steps whicliLL 'is determined, after it had already been constructed,to be in clear violation of T own°bui'lding code. .Wlul''e;pteoccupied with constructing a walled boundary to satisfy her claimed need of i l'•{"��=xspnMacy,„>arid'`security,Ms. Klein has failed to notice how this fence barrier also cloistered `k afiose'on its,opposite street side. In face,the now secluded narrow parkway between the ;n�Y.3. street and;tlie'fence is actually encouraging litter-prone individuals to toss all manner of . ,gin,.°:,• . , :.�•, r. , . 3 4 debris'=irito',the area. People are more inclined to litter now since they know the fence n 'i block any_scrutiny by the property owners. The accumulation of food wrappers,bottles, {` s 'liouseliold`trash:and construction debris is far greater now than ever before the fence was b ._'constfu&t d: Ms..Klein herewith represents in her letter to the Zoning Board the vastly ;,�'f.1j;,'"increased:and virtually unmanageable amount of litter present accumulating in front of 4 _ lier fence: Moreo'ver the fence's defiant appearance and high solid-walled construction has become ,1Y 'e-,same tune a magnet and a canvas for are unsightly graffiti. In fact the fence has set k sarid;.unfortunate precedent for this future now—"urban specific”form of vandalism ,.;.`, &:`hitt erfo;;unseen in this area. .;>For,our,town to allow such an excessive height fence to be blatantly erected, along a mayor rroadway, in clear violation of this town code, could set yet another unfortunate an `arid=legafrecedent. For example, many other individuals at the end and along beach = r 9-roads may,soon feel that they too are entitled to high fences driven to privacy and security; elding`along their roads and beach frontages. After all, it would appear ;reasonable to them that if those limited part-time folks, at the end of Sound Road, can ;Have.°such-A fence;why shouldn't 1, and established full-time resident,be any less red? - '=;`R' Ms Kline should take great pride in her unique and beautifully build home—it is a real 'sliawpieces.',Also,the property formerly had outstanding landscape potential of -'cascadirg;;,natural vegetation especially along the Sound Road frontage. And :unfortunately, several mature trees were destroyed, along with natural vegetation,being Mr. excessive yclear-cut in preparation fro her fence construction. Also, earlier damage was =;done'to.a'large number of mature pine trees were carelessly transplanted from another ` 1_'ocatigrip on the property with the haphazard instead of formed a natural barrier along the ` roadway`.,In attention to these native trees and shrubs became a lost opportunity to create t•it+ ,, y... `an`aesthetically pleasin and a secure natural property boundary. x. '. g apparent means, a more prudent approach would have been r. wi°thMs:Klein's create the Certainly,,_o 4 a.. ; ` Ai her to-seek the advice of a landscape age barrier of lasting beauty ntractor t�both for her fo"r,a pleasing,mainten =`design the character of the neighborhood- se eighborhood- - self and for inkeeping 1, ; ;:NNo ;r :rriore;than ever,Ms. Klein could use such advice and direction. Perhaps such a ,,, just one of many forms who have worked ; ;r� °firm such as Samuels and Steelman, -_, . - lexteri'siveTy,iri the area and are familiar with the topographywould be wortcontacting. rmed r,1�' ,�•,�3,�Iv1y,5neighbors'will point out that he bs. each ark gein was llot at 67 St ps about s disturbing that y issues mg ' roblems re ardin usage at t p r any"P, g g g Kline seemingly seeks to seek a special level of privilege to achieve what we as a neighborhood have been working together to achieve in terms of fair access,usage an : ..x, r , erisunng-all'those who use 67 Steps abide by the rules of the Town of Southold. 4'sJ ,,"44-8 i cerely ,� ictbr;Brown 64 Sound'Road ±mss r"%t i 1, _ 1;y,='. ;rr.#, ` - 41 dip;h t -` •. _-Y - . Nov. 28, 2005 Chairwoi 'a1V.foo' Board of Appeals 579''/Klein 40,A~ ;t,'. '?u,, ,'If,•`sem.. ��— tr _ ,. SWe.. wi itii g this'lett in regards to the newly constructed ;rf'&e,dt-the-iritersect on of Sound Road and. Sound -[give in ! enpoi :vim= Wo",,vou} dr 'ik you. to look intotl�e issue of proper fence tplacemerit,foxfences on corner pieces of property. The six foot •ice'- . ,. _stockade,Ience r-impairs driver and pedestrian view ofin oncom g tz.traffac My',6hil�dren may no longer ode their bikes in this are a -beca . s.`so..:datgero�xs. y ten year old son was almost hi ,,A•`9-� 3,'F'r', r r t by t y'a car,., "did"not see-him coming around the corner due to the Iieiglt'and;little set back of the giant fence in I' question. , }+r e_ <We'ar ;very. varorried that if the fence is not correctly placed w�11 :Someone a fid hurt or dead. Thank you. for your t� , 'rconsidetatioin:into this matter. Respectfully9 °S Chris and Stacey Butterfield 57 Sound Road Green r. port, �'� x �;r't zr�•t� its' , __ y �}�9ilt�• /L�/�ry/j •p sY+` r; f' d' >y" �•Y i 1 11 sl � ��r } ` _ Mr. Scott Russell ° .� Southold Town Supervisor Main Road, Southold „ $ November 10, 2005 "' ` Dear Supervisor Russell, We are writing to express our displeasure with the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound .Road and Sound Drive. The owner appears to have allowed the fence to be built taller than legally allowed but more important, this fence completely blocks the view for vehicles approaching : u this intersection. 'There is no visual clearance until vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians are practically at the intersection. The inability to see r=ti m either street has created an extremelydangerous vehicles fro situation. This problem exists because the fence extends too far along Sound Road completely restricting driver's vision of on-coming traffic. �:.., The volume of traffic along Sound Road is greater than many adjoining ! s f`i streets because of the 67 Step Beach. There are also a number of children in " the area riding bicycles on the street. We are very concerned about the safety of drivers and bicyclists using this area since the fence has been built. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you could offer to remedy this i worrisome situation and restore sanity and safety to this intersection. b •` Respectfully, Mary C. Gabriel Adrianne Greenberg __ . Soulvcl �'a(. � �n/p®�?~ NIV //F/-/es Er'z. cc. Ruth Oliva J1, Chairwoman/Zoning Board of.Appeals Ref. rile # 5793/Klein �i:>" �rt 't u Kik Nov. 18, 2005 Dear Ruth Oliva i C Chairwoman/ Zoning Board of Appeals Ref, File # 5793/Klein k ,r We are writing this letter in regards to the newly- constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive in Gr eenporto This fence is a hazardous obstruction that threatens the safgty of pedestrians walking on Sound Drive, as well as pedestrians proceeding east, on the North side of Sound Drive, and approaching this intersection at Sound Road. Due to this "poor line of sight," that obstructs visual contact ' between moving vehicles and walking pedestrians, bikers and is children who live and play in this area; we are asking for any assistance you could offer to remedy this extremely dan erous t, situation. We have already experienced a narrow escape while on one of our daily waRcs on Sound Drive, from a car turning onto Sound f Drive, from the 6667 steps beach." The fence is constructed taller thanlegate allowed. This was done with no consideration for the safety of the neighboring residents. Respectful] , z. - 'Mr.,Scott Russell January 2�:�`, b6 Supervisor Town of Southold VIA FAX Dear Mr. Russell: Of the many hundred of items on the docket in front of you as you begin your term, we want to bring one to your attention that we think is noteworthy in how is represents the kind of energy that is needlessly expended by citizens and Town employees when something is addressed in an after-the-fact matter. It perhaps marks a bellwether of things to be aware of going forward. Part of our support for you in you run for supervisor was based on the fact of several conversations where you spoke of the need for the correct balance between the rights of property owners (where of course legally supported)and those needs of the greater good of the community. At issue for the 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition is the stockade fence at the end of Sound Road(up from Shady Lady Inn) --a 380 foot long six-foot-plus high fence that was erected last August. It is in violation of the code of Southold which allows only four feet, The contractor was apparently aware that this fence was in violation when he installed it, yet it seems it was erected anyway based what we later heard was his "alleged assurance" that a variance could be easily obtained. So at this writing a neighborhood has been galvanized, a petition has been put together with strong opposition to this fence regarding the: • pedestrian and traffic hazard the fence has created • trash problem the fence has exacerbated • graffiti it has attracted • probable drug trafficking spot that that has inadvertently increased due to the new "privacy"this fence provides • destruction of a vista that was once the right of all those that visited this beach road. A lot of well meaninf time has been spent in preparation by citizens for the Zoning Board meeting set for this Thursday, January 26 . Likewise, a lot of well meaning time has been expended by those on the Zoning Board of Appeals,the Highways Department,the Buildings Department,to name a few. The ruling by this Board at the time is unknown. But we do have to wonder: Why are things like this allowed to proceed in the first place? Did something fail in the Department of the Code Enforcement? Is the system not designed to catch these things in advance? In other communities, we know that when construction is out of town code, the perpetrator in question is told to remove the structure, or the town promptly removes it at the owner's expense and they can then re-apply for a proper pennit. No one want to be drastic here, but in the case of this fence, pedestrians and vehicular lives are at risk, to say nothing of the precedent this fence has set for all beach roads throughout the town of Southold that, if allowed to stand, will allow all property owners to erect such barricades along beach roads. Wouldn't this time spent by all of those on this issue have been better spent on say, volunteering by its citizens, or on freeing Southold employees to get ahead of issues to prevent zoning mishaps rather than addressing them after the fact? Sincerely, Robert Becton Victor B own <� 6 Sound Road 64 Sound Road 917-685-6605 631-477-1083 i November 28, 2005 Ruth Oliva Chairwoman, Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971-0959 Dear Ms. Oliva: Attached is a petition signed by the 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition and those outraged and concerned about the fence erected under the direction of the owners at 160 Sound Road. The issues surrounding this petition are attached, so we will not reiterate them in this letter. You should also note that additional signatures are being added to this petition and will be presented to you shortly. Other residents have written Southold Town (see attached letters) expressing some of the concerns regarding this fence. • We have repeatedly asked officials in Southold Town when will the hearing take place regarding this fence. We have heard nothing from the Town only to find out via a call, made to one of the residents from the contractor who erected this fence,that the hearing is scheduled for December 19th, 2005. Why have the residents not been informed of this hearing? • Why have the residents adjacent to this property not received the customary letter from the owner asking for their specific input and objections? • Why-is the contractor now calling those who have written letters telling them he is sure a variance will be issued? And why is this contractor, who does business with Southold Town, apparently not even aware of the existing codes, and why has he not acted on this egreaious installation when he has been informed in writing by the Town to that effect? (see attached letter) r • Why are the owners of this properly apparently i ng. oring this issue and failin to take responsibility? We are losing patience and faith in the process of Southold Town in enforcing codes and being able to address a situation in a timely manner. At this point we are also weighing our options to have the fence entirely removed based on what to us is a blatant disregard for the codes and safety of the local residents. We will reiterate again that the entire fence must be addressed, not just the section that is causing a traffic and pedestrian safety issue. Please advise us in writing of your response. V� ictt Brown Ro rt Becton 7V 1�= ?L 64 Sound Road 66 Sound Road Greenport,N.Y. 11944 Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631-477-1083 631-477-2074 cc: Scott Russell,Supervisor, Southold'Town(elect) Ed Forrester,Code Enforcement Officer,Southold Pete Han-is, Superintendent of Highways,Southold Mike Verity,Chief of Southold Building Department The Better Business Bureau,New York Robert Bohn,Robert Bohn Contracting,Inc. The Suffolk County Executive Office of Consumer Affairs Josh Horton October 18, 2005 Southold Town.Supervisor 53095 Main Road Southold,N.Y. 11971 Dear Josh: I have recently reported both to the Highway Department and to the code enforcement officer the unsightly collection of garbage(three large yellow bags strewn open) which had been left their since Monday, October 10 outside of the property of Geri Klein at 160 Sound Road. This trash was adjacent to the area just before 67 Steps. This trash has attracted animals and birds and is a major eyesore right next to one of the town's more popular and scenic sights. A neighbor pointed this out to the residents on Sunday, October 16'h and they did nothing to attend to these bags since they obviously had been missed by their trash collector. The Highway Department also apparently elected not to pick up this garbage during their regular runs to the area. When I called this department I was passed off to the code enforcement officer, Ed Forrester. When Mr. Forrester finally returned my call, I was told that the Highway Department had been alerted to pick this garbage up in their next run. This did not actually occur until about five days later. My complaint is why do residents have to prod the Town to address these types of issues directly with the owner of the property, and why does the Town not respond to something that creates a sanitation and visual problem in a timely manner? It shouldn't be the job of a resident to contact multiple agencies to get a routine matter resolved. I am also astounded that Mr. Forrester told me that garbage heft strewn along a road by a resident for over one week does not represent any form of violation, and that the Town can do nothing even if this situation happens again! What's wrong with this picture? Maybe it would help if the Town were to begin employing provisions from the`Broken Window Theory"as it clearly defines how inaction on such matters leads to bigger problems. Originally the owners placed garbage in containers, but apparently they realized the empty cans could not be placed back over their 6 foot high fence(another violation that we are addressing with the town). There certainly must be a more responsive and compliant manner in which the Town can address matters such as this. Please advise. Sincerely Victor Brown 64 Sound Road 631-477-1083 cc: Pete Harris, Highway Superintendent, Southold Ed Forrester, Code Enforcement Officer, Southold 76 115 a 4 i WE fA t �.F'X4 �,,,�IAC{nig„ ��-�N��f" -��.1�'.A`rJ(`�2n�1 `ae /g 4 a rd7C Ct��* �1 [C t2� ��)6 ni�t 14.Il f�C— , /AZ C( 1/Pvo'AJ�11 ,t p CAJ -�5624?.G Gi v a` he_ •kt Z/4.�-fXce / Al t r '_ 34- fs _ _- '7cNT`iq L ' 7 �? ` ' -M-1)_ t V- j 1 C-c _ 41_ _ 6 A�-. '�C p'(=� J '�'�-_�. ��-'��--� �� �,{� /ti�•�/jS�?['7tL�•y� [r� �cJ`zwg cf h'd,,� aGtw+� Vt ter' c 'c_t� T/.. 6F yi�o'j_ cid v v"evJ--v 6. o)'4�Lc�-fj ra/e -`EL�'k&75 _. �l�P -h�f1 .eE_ zi'vo e � - T 7 q l dUl�� 5 1�_. %�? C v � M g - c r- v t� -!1J j l P _ 1C 2�Lfi� ` � `� �f rf� -1-- . i � �'o ►G�% s ;;�j i�z i�� ;<+�f .� 4S-7c `7�') � Of All aK �?� CR, �TC'ct.`,'v'$ _ � � 0. vqa mss: 1- " /uhf vu � Owl- C�-U't��tticj Cd7j S r�ul���3r� -/v �� �'w ' ��-�/� .5� q�u� �`/7"?- Brown "?-Brown N ' 1 .64--Sound Road - Greenp6rt, N.Y'. 11944 VICTOR A.BROWN 64 Sound Road Greenport,New York 11944 631-477-1083 January 24,2006 Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 RE: G.Klein. 160 Sound Drive. Greenport,New York Dear Ms. Oliva, I would like to comment on some of Ms.Klein's curious positions and attitudes concerning her 400 ft. fence along Sound Road, adjacent to the 67 Steps beach front area.Most troubling is her insistence that.she is distinctly justified in maintaining the fence determined'to be of excessive legal height. She persists in demanding this right even when the fence was formally cited for code violation after it had already been constructed. Moreover, it is troubling that the fence contractor's variance application was(mysteriously) accepted even after the fence had already been disapproved by the Building Department. To even consider a variance in this sequence and"after the fact"is most improper and suspect. I would submit that this factor alone is adequate reason for rejecting this variance as applied for. While preoccupied with constructing a walled boundary to satisfy her need for privacy and security,Ms.Klein failed to notice how this fence barrier also cloistered those on its opposite street side. In fact,the now secluded narrow parkway between the street and the fence is actually encouraging litter-prone individuals to toss all manner of debris into the area.People are more inclined to litter now since they know the fence blocks any scrutiny by the property owners. The accumulation of food wrappers,bottles,household trash,and construction debris is far greater now than ever before the fence was constructed. Ms. Klein has, in fact, a vastly increased and virtually unmanageable amount of litter presently accumulating in front of her fence. Moreover,the fence's defiant appearance and high solid-walled construction has become at the same time a magnet and a canvas for unsightly graffiti.In fact,the fence has set an unfortunate precedent for this,until now, "urban specific"form of vandalism,hitherto unseen in this area. For our town to allow such an excessive height fence to be blatantly erected along a major roadway in clear violation of the town code could set yet another unfortunate(legal)precedent. For example,many other individuals at the ends and along beach front roads may soon feel that they,too, are entitled to high fences for privacy and security shielding along their roads and l beach frontages.After all,it would appear reasonable to them that if those limited,part-time folks at the end of Sound Road can have such a fence,why shouldn't I, an established full-time resident,be any less privileged. Ms. Klein should take great pride in her unique and beautifully built home—a real"showpiece." Also,the property formerly had outstanding landscape potential of cascading,natural vegetation, especially along the Sound Road frontage. And, unfortunately, several mature trees have been destroyed along with natural vegetation being excessively clear-cut in preparation for her fence construction Also, earlier damage was done to a large number of mature pine trees which were carelessly transplanted from another location on her property with the haphazard intent of forming a natural barrier along the roadway. Inattention to these native trees and shrubs became a lost opportunity to create both an aesthetically pleasing and secure natural property boundary. Certainly,with Ms. Klein's apparent means, a more prudent approach would have been for her to seek the advice of a landscape architect versus a fence contractor to create the design for a pleasing,maintenance-free foliage barrier of lasting beauty—both for herself and for the neighborhood to enjoy. Now,more than ever,Ms. Klein could use such advice and direction. Maybe some of the damage to her vegetation can be salvaged.If she was willing to accept my personal suggestion,I could recommend the architectural firm of Samuels& Steelman who retain a landscape architect associate.As a long-time acquaintance of Mr. Samuels,I would be happy to introduce him to Ms. Klein. Finally,Ms. Klein's implication that any disturbance at the end of Sound Road has arisen and escalated since she has occupied her property is totally baseless.Well before her house was constructed,I personally informed Ms. Klein, as did several adjacent residents,that the 67 Steps beach front was a very active and popular town road-end destination.I further informed her that as the new property owner, she could effectively assist in our neighborhood effort to rectify this on-going problem of litter at 67 Steps.Instead,her fence has now exacerbated this problem. As already indicated, it's distressing that such a clear issue of town code violation was initially ever submitted for variance consideration and subsequently allowed to utilize so much time from many of our busy town departments. It is also of concern that similar instances of code violations by the average property owner are seldom mediated,and usually refused outright,by the town. Yet, some of our more privileged residents receive special dispensation in this regard. Thank you in advance for your fair and unbiased resolve in this matter. Sincerely, v Victor A. Brown NOTI (a. E 0r HEARINtj "he following application will be heard by the . Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town- Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold: . 'AME : KLEIN , G . #5793 UIAP # mE 33-4-35 . 2 APPEAL : Height Variance BEQUEST: As= Built Fence DATE : THURS . ,-- JAN . 26 , 10m.20AM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . 1ONING BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765- 1809 67 Steps Neighborhood Coalition Petition of objection to fence height at 160 Sound Road This petition is signed by residents in the neighborhood of 67 Steps,and those concerned with the problems caused by the fence between Sound Drive and Sound Road meeting 67 Steps. In August,2005,a fence was erected under the direction of the owners of 160 Sound Road,which is between Sound Drive and the end of Sound Road ending at 67 steps in the township of Southold, N.Y. The solid wooden fence is currently at a height of sig-to six-foot six inches from ground level along its length of over 380 feet The height of this fence is in violation of Southold Town code, which stipulates no fence,walls or berm can be erected in excess of four feet along any frontage property line(Chapter 100,Article M011l,Sections 100-231 & 100-232). On August 15th a letter of disapproval was sent to Geri Mein at 160 Sound Road by the Southold Buildings Department. To date,no known action has taken by the property owner to comply with l this letter. The petition demands that in the least the height of the fence be reduced to the four foot level. • The fence creates a blind corner at Sound Road and Sound Drive,creating a dangerous traffic hazard to cars and pedestrians. • The fence creates a fortress effect along Sound Road,not in keeping with the more open view standards set forth by Southold Town. ' • The fence in its current structure has attracted graffiti and increased littering on the beach road side at the top of 67 Steps. Southold Town should not bear the extra burden of addressing this problem. The signatories of this petition demand that the fence comply with Southold Town ordinances. We demand to be notified and attend any hearing that takes place if an application for variance is Med by the owners at 160 Sound Road® Signed Name Address Date S-6 50 1,A A, _Aq Petition of objection to fence height at 160 Sound Road Al rl AI L65 � G IZ6:-:A s-) L2 JZL21 '7 2-/0 2-2 u 1/0 43 Z]ff f �-_ ' �1SV-k-a-%2 1l -t 3 os� Petition of objection to fence height at 160 Sound Road ✓J LAO '. 4/a6Ia6 and half bathroom (toilet and sink). construct,at property known as 13795 are not permitted in an accessory build- The reasons in disapproving the build- Oregon Road (right-of-way extending ing,and only one,single-family dwelling ing permit application are that the new from the north side,of applicant's prop- is permitted on a lot.A Certificate of LEGAL NOTICE construction will increase the degree of erty),Cutchogue;CTM 83-2-10:16: Preexisting Use was issued 7/5/2001 for THURSDAY,JANUARY 26,2006 nonconformance when located-at-less (a) barn (building.#1) at less a single-family dwelling and"accessory SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING than 3 feet from the side lot line and less than 75 feet minunum principal build- garage with living space above*."Lora- BOARD OF APPEALS than 35 feet from the front lot line,Lo- mg rear yard setback, tion of Property.East End Road,Ash- PUBLIC HEARINGS cation of Property:4185 Camp Mineola (b) additions with alterations ers Island;CTM 4-7-3.3(part of Lot 3). NOTICE IS-HEREBY GIVEN,pur- Road,Mattituck;CTM 1000-123-5-26. to a nonconforming accessory garage The Board of Appeals will hear all suant to Section 267 of the Town Law 10:15 A.M:`GREGG and KATHI (building#2),for the reason that the ga- persons,or their representatives,desir- and.Chapter 100(Zoning),Code of the ROBERTS•#5817. A variance is re- rage is not entirely in a rear yard,and is ing to be heard or desiring to submit Town of Southold,the following public quested under Sections 100-243A and extended into a front yard,and written statements before the conclu- hearings will be held by the SOUTH- 100-244,based on the Building Inspec- (c) two (2) accessory sheds,an sion of each hearing noted above.Each OLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF tor's October 6,2005 Notice of Disap- as-built and proposed, referred to as hearing will not start earlier than des- APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 proval of an application for a building storage container buildings#3 and#4, ignated above. Files are available for Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, permit concerning additions and/or in a yard other'than the code-required review during regular business hours.If New York 11971-0959,on THURSDAY, alterations to-the dwelling The reason rear yard. you have'questions,please do not hesi- JANUARY 26;2006: ' ' , ., stated in the disapproval is that the as- 11:25 A.M.MICHAEL and HELEN tate to contact our office at(631)765- 9:30 A.M. JAMES NEUMANN built enclosure of an existmg porch will REDDINGTON 45792. Request'for 1809,or by email:linda.kowalski@town. #5822.A variance is requested under maintain a nonconforming front yard a Lot Waiver under Section 100-26 to southold.ny.us. Section 100-30A.3,bulk schedule,based setback,increasing the degree of non- unmerge vacant land identified as CTM Dated: January 10,2006. on the Buildinglnspector's October 20, conformance at less_than 35 feet from 1000-104-2=7.1, from the adjacent va- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 2005 Notice of.Disapproval concerning the•front-lot line.'Location of Property: cant land identified as•CTM 1000-104- RUTH D.OLIVA,CHAIRWOMAN a building permit application to amend 2545 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue; 2-7.2,based on the'Building Inspector's 7706-1T 1/12 Permit No.31483=Z for`construction,of; CTM 110=5-1. 'August 23,2005-Notice of Disapproval - a new,dweiling-yv4ich`will,exceed the, ':'1620 A.M.GERIARMINE KLEIN and its determination'that-the proper- code•limitation=of 2-1/2-st6ries,for-'pro-: ` #5793..A variance-is requested under ties have been merged pursuant to Sec- posed 132=si�uare,fet;of,`space above ;Section 100;231, based on the Build- tion 100-25:Location of Property:Cor- the second-floor and code-compliant ing Inspector's August 15,2005 Notice ner of Horton.Road and Bittersweet stairs,at 750 Mill Road,Mattituck;CTM of Disapprdval concerning a request Lane,Cutchogue,containing 63,808 sq. 107-14. "- , for approval of a fence shown on the ft.as merged.Zone District:R-40 Low- 9:35,A.M.,TIM .-TRUJILLO and 12/D/05 survey,as-built,prior to recent Density Residential. PAULA DANIEL#5830. The Appli- changes. The fence exceeds the code 11:45 A.M.BARBARA and KIMO- icapt:Owner requests a Special Excep? limitation of four feet when,located in NO THERMOS#5825.'A'variance is tion to establish an-Accessory Apart- the front yard,at 160 Sound Avenue and requested under Section•100-244,based. went within their existing single-family Sound Road, Greenport; CTM 33-4- on the Building Inspector's October 20,. building,as,provided-'by Section 100 35.2.-Zone-District:R-40 Low'—Density' 2005 Notice of Disapproval,amended 3113;,subsection.13 of:thezoning code._ ,--Residential. December 8,2005 concerning an appli- ,Locatiori of Property: 580 Soundview- : 1Oc45 A.M.EDGEWATER II,LLC cation for a building permit to demolish Avenue,Peconic;CTM,74'2-6.�.-, _ - - 15815._A.variance-is requested-under' an existing dwelling and construct a new "9:40 A:IvI.kiflN'and-NINA:WIN-- Section 100-30A.3;bulk schedule,based -dwelling with setbacks at less,than the TER(Oviner:MATINE;INC)#5809. on'the Building Inspector's October 19, code required'10'feet on a single side Variances'are requested'undei'Sections '2005 Notice of Disapproval concerning and less than 15 on the second side yard, 100-33 and 100239.4A(1),based bathe,' a request to amend a building permit, at 355 Sound Beach-Drive,Mattituck; Building Inspector's October 7, 2005 'and requesting variance relief exceed- CTM 99-1-19. Notice of Disapproval concerning an ing the variance limitations granted 11:55 A.M. JAMES and KAREN accessory swimming pool,proposed in a under Appeal No.5330 concerning the HOEG#5821.A Variance,is requested side yard instead of the code-required -' height of a dwelling which irregular under Section 100-31A, based on the :front yard'or rear yard,and in a location roofline�exceeded 35 feet at its highest .Buikhng Inspector's November 1,2005 at'less than 100 feetfrom the top�_of the point and included a bedroom designed -Notice of Disapproval for a-certificate bluff or bank of,the Long Island Sound. in space above the second-floor:This of occupancy to allow the existing one Location of Property:590North'View variance is for a third design,modifying story building to be used as a principal Drive,Orient;CTM 13-1-5.1. and expanding the floorspace above the office use,instead of an•accessory•office 9 50yAM THQMAS.LAND I-#5816. second floor,exceeding the code limita- in conjunction:with the former dwelling A vana ce:is:iequested.under,Section tion of 2-1/2 stories,and modifying and use which was removed,at 15400 Main j `'Ib02d4 based-on=ihe Building-Inspec- adding roof,angles which exceed the Road,Mattituck;CTM 114-9-1. II tor's November 7,2005 Notice of Dis- code limitation bf 35 feet.Location of 12:05 PM.PAT IAVARONE#582§. approval concerning an application for Property: 63735 C.R. 48 (a/k/a North A variance is requested under Section a building permit for a new'swimming Road or Middle Road), Greenport; 100-30A.3,bulk schedule,based on the pool,which construction will increase CTM•40-1-20.2. Building Inspector's November 1,2005 ,the;bwlding coverage of the lot in ex- . 11:00 A.M. JON and KATHLEEN Notice-of Disapproval 'concerning'a cess•of•the code"s_20% limitation, at MARINO#5831.A variance is request- building permit,under#22830Z which 950 Wateiview Drive, Southold;'GTIVI_- 'ed under Sections 100-33 and 100-242, restricted the use of the attic to"non- 78-7-28• based on the Building Inspector's De- habitable" area. An application has 9:55A.M.SUSAN ROGERS GRUN cember 14,2005 Notice of Disapproval been filed for a building permit for the , #5824.A variance is'requested under concerning a building permit applica- as-built alterations which modified the i Section 100-239.4A(1), based on the tion to construct,an addition to the non-habitable attic area to living space Building Inspector's November 15,2005 existing accessory•garage.The reason and converted,the floor above the sec- Notice of Disapproval concerning a for disapproving the building permit and story to a third story,exceeding the building permit application to construct application is that the construction will code limitation for 2-1/2 stories, an addition,for the reason that,ihe new increase the degree of nonconformance ' '12:20 P.M. GEORGE and`ELIZA-' construction will be less than 160 feet when construction will be in the side BETH IRELAND #5814.A variance from the top of the bluff or bank of the yard area of the existing accessory ga- is requested under Sections 100-31A Sound,at 57305 C.R.48(a/k/a Middle rage,instead of the rear yard.Location and',100-242A, based on the Building Road or North Road),Southold;CTM of Property:10105 Soundview Avenue, Inspector's'September 26,2005 Notice 52-1-6. Southold;CTM 54-8-5. of Disapproval concerning a requested 10:00 A.M. PHILIP MILOT#5705. 11:10 AM. TIMOTHY STEELE fora building permit to construct an- Variances are requested under Sections #5618. (Continuation from Variances addition and as-built alterations to an /� 100-33,100-242,and 100-244,based on are requested under Sections 100- existing accessory building with living the Building Inspector's November 21, 31A(2)(c) and 100-242A, based on space.The reasons for disapproving the 2005 amended Notice of Disapproval the Building Department's April 23, building permit are that the addition "— concerning a proposed second-story 2003 Notice of Disapproval, amended will change the intensity of use,increas- addition and alterations to the existing January 28, 2005, concerning a build- , ing the degree of nonconformity, and one-story garage,for a recreation room ing permit application for the following the as-built additions 'and alterations ( � ,, #7706 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Jean Burgon of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks, successively, commencing on the 12th day of January , 2006 Pri c' al Clerk Sworn to before me this l day of 2006 ��V l U6 21STINA VOLINSKI WfAft PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01-V06105050 buotied in Suffolk County �c:r(�„esloi tXoifes February 28, 2008 0 "�l� September 19 ,2000 To:Mike Verity, Chief Southold Building Department Subject: Needed Further Evaluation of Potential Traffic Danger from Fence Obstruction/Corner of Sound Road and Sound Drive From: Victor Brown Further to our recent conversation on this matter,my neighbor and I have rechecked the"clearness of view" one has approaching the intersection at Sound Drive while driving South on Sound Road, and find it completely obstructed by at least five(5) of the existing, six (6)foot fence segments.Accordingly,the earlier removal of a single fence segment has accomplished essentially nothing to improve the"span of vision"needed for a clear and distinct view of moving vehicles,kids riding bikes,etc...,on Sound Drive at a safe distance away from reaching the intersection with Sound Road. What's specifically overlooked here,in the move to reposition fence modules -beginning at the standard thirty(30)foot distance from the corner of Sound Drive, along Sound Road-is that this is,by no means, your common intersection of town streets. Quite to the contrary! Instead of entering Sound Road in the standard grid pattern,of 90 degrees, Sound Drive intersects Sound Road at an extreme angle of less than 45 degrees.This unique street convergence necessitates'a broadened view span-looking from Sound Road, southwesterly, across the wooded parkway,to Sound Drive.This sharp angle of the Sound Drive approach to Sound Road contrives to obscure the view of vehicles (as if hidden)until they are dangerously close to the corner.Therefore, the combination of faster moving Sound Road traffic,with the likely unseen approach of Sound Drive vehicles, converging at the Sound Road intersection,could be a"disaster waiting to happen." Therefore,due to both the unusual,acute angle of Sound Drive,inhibiting the view of its' entering Sound Road�rf cc,and the tendency for traffic to move at a much faster clip on Sound Road's downhill gradient, we've estimated that a minimum of seventy(70)feet(measured from the corner) of totally unobstructed view is needed,for one proceeding on Sound Road,to safely approach the intersection at Sound Drive.This would require removing a minimum of five(5) additional fence sections to adequately clear the view now being seriously blocked at the corner. Finally,,as already indicated,at least fifty (50)feet of the fence,beginning near the Sound Drive/Sound Road intersection,appears to lie within the town's right-of-way.I would urge that,if this is not corrected by totally removing a number of fence segments (as recommended above),then any remaining segments should be properly repositioned well onto the owner's (survey designated)property line.Technically,the closer the placement of the fence line to the road,the more it blocks the clear line of view needed to be restored at the intersection. In light of the above,it is hoped that our neighborhood can count on the cooperation and expertise of all necessary town entities,including the Building Department, code Enforcement,Highway Department, and Police Department, to carefully reevaluate and consider all relevant traffic circumstances and conditions appli- cable to this nontypical intersection. Should corrective action be called for,it is requested that there be no hesitation in the action of removal and repositioning of fence sections,which may harmfully obstruct the view, thereby causing a potential traffic hazard at this intersection. Your written response,concerning intended action in this matter,would be appreciated. F— - I N® Rar�rse Ra eu,� Victor Brown 64 Sound Road r Greenport,NY 11944 Tel. #477-1083 Nov. 18, 2005 Dear Ruth Oliva C Chairwoman/ Zoning Board of Appeals Ref. File # 5793/Klein We are writing this letter in regards to the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive in Greenport. This fence is a hazardous obstruction that threatens the safe1y of pedestrians walking on Sound Drive, as well as pedestrians proceeding east, on the North side of Sound Drive, and approaching this intersection at Sound Road. Due to this "poor line of sight," that obstructs visual contact between moving vehicles and walking pedestrians, bikers and children who live and play in this area; we are asking for any assistance you could offer to remedy this extremely dangerous situation. We have already experienced a narrow escape while on one of our daily walks on Sound Drive, from a car turning onto Sound Drive, from the "67 steps beach." The fence is constructed taller than legally allowed. This was done with no consideration for the safety of the neighboring residents. Respectful, ,, ' Mr. Scott Russell Southold Town Supervisor Main Road, Southold November 10, 2005 Dear Supervisor Russell, We are writing to express our displeasure with the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive. The owner appears to have allowed the fence to be built taller than legally allowed but, more important, this fence completely blocks the view for vehicles approaching this intersection. There is no visual clearance until vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians are practically at the intersection. The inability to see approaching vehicles from either street has created an extremely dangerous situation. This problem exists because the fence extends too far along Sound Road completely restricting driver's vision of on-coming traffic. The volume of traffic along Sound Road is greater than many adjoining streets because of the 67 Step Beach. There are also a number of children in the area riding bicycles on the street. We are very concerned about the safety of drivers and bicyclists using this area since the fence has been built. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you could offer to remedy this worrisome situation and restore sanity and safety to this intersection. Respectfully, Mary C. Gabriel Adrianne Greenberg ___ 4 3 So u/V Jd• � �^�P©�T i11�✓ cc. Ruth Oliva Chairwoman/Zoning Board of Appeals Ref. File # 5793/Klein Nov. 28, 2005 Dear Ruth Oliva C Chairwoman/ Zoning Board of Appeals boos Ref. File # 5793/Klein ®��>��,� We are writing this letter in regards to the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive in Greenport. We would like you to look into the,issue of proper fence placement for fences on corner pieces of property. The six foot stockade fence impairs driver and pedestrian view of oncoming traffic. My children may no longer ride their bikes in this area because it is so dangerous. My ten year old son was almost hit by a car that did not see him coming around the corner due to the height and little set back of the giant fence in question. We are very worried that if the fence is not correctly placed someone will end up hurt or dead. Thank you for your consideration into this matter. Respectfully, 4- -0"— a Chris and Stacey Butterfield 57 Sound Road Greenport, NY OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Office Location: North Fork Bank Building—First Floor, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Mailing address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 httn://southoldtown.northfork.net Email: Linda.Kowalski(a,Town.Southold.ny.us (631) 765-1809 (ext. 5011 during recording) fax (631) 765-9064 TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: DATE: �'a / oC /2005 MESSAGE: ( X) Correspondence or related attached, regarding your c Thank you. Pages attached: 5 � ova NOV 2 2 2005 Nov. 18, 2005 Dear Ruth Oliva ��`�°'� - �� �F� �a� C Chairwoman/ Zoning Board of Appeals Ref. File # 5793/Klein We are writing this letter in regards to the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive in Greenport. This fence is a hazardous obstruction that threatens the sgRty of pedestrians walking on Sound Drive, as well as pedestrians proceeding east, on the North side of Sound Drive, and approaching this intersection at Sound Road. Due to this "poor line of sight," that obstructs visual contact between moving vehicles and walking pedestrians, bikers and children who live and play in this area; we are asking for any assistance you could offer to remedy this extremeldangerous situation. We have already experienced a narrow escape while on one of our daily walks on Sound Drive, from a car turning onto Sound Drive, from the "67 steps beach." The fence is constructed taller than legally allowed. This was done with no consideration for the safety of the neighboring residents. Respectfully, / X005 Mr. Scott Russell Southold Town Supervisor Main Road, Southold November 10,2005 Dear Supervisor Russell, We are writing to express our displeasure with the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive. The owner appears to have allowed the fence to be built taller than legally allowed but, more important,this fence completely blocks the view for vehicles approaching this intersection.There is-no wisual,,1earance until vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians are practically at the,intersection. The inability to see approaching vehicles from either street has created an extremely dangerous situation. This problem exists because the fence extends too far along Sound Road completely restricting driver's vision of on-coming traffic. The volume of traffic along Sound Road is greater than many adjoining streets because of the 67 Step Beach. There are also a number of children in the area riding bicycles on the street. We are very concerned about the safety of drivers and bicyclists using this area since the fence has been built. We would greatly appreciate any'assistance you could offer to remedy this worrisome situation and restore sanity and safety to this intersection. Respectfully, Mary C, Gabriel Adrianne Greenberg ___ 43 Sound �� ice' �^�P©�7;M�✓ //q///c cc. Ruth Oliva Chairwoman/Zoning.Board ofAppeals Ref. File#5793/Klein";: ";i C. 0 t ' �6-q 13 Mr. Scott Russell Z0r000a ® Southold Town Supervisor Main Road, Southold November 10,2005 Dear Supervisor Russell, We are writing to express our displeasure with the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive.The owner appears to have allowed the fence to be built taller than legally allowed but,more important,this fence completely blocks the view for vehicles approaching this intersection.There'is-no.visual-,.clearance until vehicles,bicycles or pedestrians are practically at the-intersection.The inability to see approaching vehicles from either street has created an extremely dangerous situation.This problem exists because the fence extends too far along Sound Road completely restricting driver's vision of on-coming traffic. The volume of traffic along Sound Road is greater than many adjoining streets because of the 67 Step Beach.There are also a number of children in the area riding bicycles on the street.We are very concerned about the safety of drivers and bicyclists using this area since the fence has been built. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you could offer to remedy this worrisome situation and restore sanity and safety to this intersection. Respectfully, Mary C, Gabriel Adrianne Greenberg ___ 43 Soun,cJ Rd.� '�P©��'A'y V/cc. Ruth Oliva Chairwoman/ZoninguBoard of 4Appeals Ref.'File#5793/Klein. A' r ,(�_ (. T'own:bf Southold ZBA I C�7 App. Narrte Q=Tax,Map` Q File:No: II- . -- Board Member Michael Simon �' i S Search: �.s ❑'Unliste 'L3- I _-- Other Hearing Time: L 3?726PN ( Fi Number: 5793 T Tax Map: 33.-4-35.2 App:.:Name Klein, Geri Armine keceived.Date:. 9/26ICt511Tot. Fees: sl 1 -Date.forwarded to Town r Hamlet Greenport Type: Residential ° Zone: R-40 ; A _mm E{Status:., Incomplete IIAction:' _. \ „� _ s Meeting Dates B-ui[ding,Dept., L.ogatloni'160 Sound Avenue I Meeting,Date ND-Date 1 8/15/05 Yk :Short, I Hearing_Date-1 ND Date 2 100-231; fence height must be max. 4 ft.; proposed €;Desc�: , fence is 6 ft. (length not provided at initial 1 Hearing Date'2 I.ND Date 3 E_ l submission _. .. ;I Hearing Date 3 ND ©ate 4 -� Hearing Date 4 ME) Date 5 J Updates on survey requested for as-built fence; also 1 ;Notes ,' to show setbacks &height within 30 ft. from corner ° ! Hearing Date 5 - ND Date6 E . (code limits to 30 high for first 30 at intersection). i + °Action Date: ND,Date"7 10/13]©5.. 11:56;PM 'CAPS j NUM`1 M; Developed by the Southold town Data.Prorkssirig.Department�)'O'e - UV �q in�satin�u..c�n ■ri■n�■ui�a■aiia■�tn■uiia�■rni :�i■uuna� MOM T__]rr7g Fileiew Toolbar',.Help w C bt 33.4-35.2 =413889 Southold` Active R?S:1 School: Gieeoport S=chool' Arm ni Klein,Geri RoII-Year: 2005 Curr Yre 1 Family Res Land AV: 6;800 ;160 S'ound,Dr Land`8ize:1.75 acnes. Total AV: 12,000 Owner Total: 2, r Taxable Value Miscellaneous" 'N'ame: Geri Armine=Kleim' ( County: 12.800- Book: 121150 AddlAddr: Muni- 12.000 Page: 794 Street: 65 Montague StSchool:p 12,800 Mortg: PO Box: Bank: City:. Brooklyn,NY Zip: 11'201- ' Schl,affer Star: 12.800 Acct No: 1.' Sale' Total: 1 Site 1 of 1 Land 0 of 0 Book Page -Sale Date Sale Price-"E Owner `Prpcls: 1,Family Res x 12050, 794' ._ 06106}00, a_,320,OU0'rbirmirie-Klein,-Ge •Nbad.Cd:O Sewer: Water:,' Utilities ,Eiemption Total:,D;R: ° Building Total:'".0°` -Term Own Code' :Amount Year, pct :SpeciaLDistrict Total: 3_e; ` Velue} �► Improrrement .°< ;'Total:,,'0' - s" Code ' Units.', PcF Ty0e," yp Move Tax Type` Mame_ Dim7, Dim SQFT Y%Buil} FD031 .E=W Protectia _00 .00 : N 00 o = 54+01.1 .SolidFaste Ia 00 .00. 001'x:` ..�..en-+-Yaw.... Ready2-15-0514:43:44 Start Inlox. Miergsoft Outlook-,R ZBA Application lrifo`rmatiorretl,�Q y` "� I A Muth Oliva November 28, 2005 Chairwoman, Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 RE, 16 Southold. 1'Q.1-i. 11971-0959 NOV 2 9 2005 ;Gear Ms. Otiva, t6 AS-7 73 zopflb3c� L10"Ar'o 0- Attached is-a petition signed by the 67 Steps Neighboi-hood Coalition and those APPEALS outraged and concerned about the fence erected under the direction of the owaers at 160 Sound Road. The issues surrounding this petition are attached, so we will not reiterate tbern in this letter. You should also note that additional signatures are being added to th)s petition and Nwill be presented to you shortly. Other residents have written Southold Town(see attached letters) expressing some of the concerns regarding this fence. 0 We have repeatedly asked officials in Southold Town when will the hearing takt- place Yegarding this fence- We have heard nothing from the Town only to find out via a call, ruade to one of the residents from the contractor who erected this fence that the hearing is scheduled for December 19"', 2005. YDay have the residents not been infomled of this hearina? a Why have the residents adjacent to this property not received the customary letter ftom ihe owner asking for their specific input and objections? 0 Why is the mitractor now calling those who have written letters telling them lie is surea-variance will be issued? And why is this contractor, who does business whb Southold Town, apparently not even aware of the existing codes, mid why has he not acted on this egregious installation when he has been hiformed in wrjitlpg by the Town to that effect? (see attached letter) * Wh-/are the owners of this.,proVerty apparently gnoring this issue and faili� to Lake responsibility? We an-losing patience and faith in the process of Southold Town in enforcing codes and being able to address a situation in a timely manner- At this point ive are also weighing our options t,have the fence entirely removed based on what to us is a blatant disregard for the codes and safety of the local residents. We will reiterate again that the entire, fence must bc-addressed, ria just the section that is causing a traffic and pedestrian safely issue. Please advise LIS in writing of your response. Victor Brown Robert Becton 64 Sound Road 66 Sound Road Greenport: N Y. 11944 Grieenpoit.N.Y. 11944 X31-477-1 095 631-477-2074 cc'.' Scott Russell, Supervisor,Southold Toivn Ed Forrester,Code Enforcerneut Officer, Southold Pete Rarris, Superintendent of Highways, Southold Mike Verity, Chief of Southold wilding Department The Better Business Bureau.New Yoik Robert Bohil,Robert Bohn Contracting, Inc. The S'uffol k County Executive Office of consumer Affairs OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Office Location: Town Annex, NFB Building, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Ave. Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 fax (631) 765-9064 REPLY FORM DATE: I O /3 /08 TO: — ' to S ZB Ref#,6:, ! 3 ,1�1j Date of Buil1��ng Inspector's Notice of Disapproval:__ ( ) The application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. Please furnish seven(7) sets of the following: Please furnish seven 7 sets of the following(� ( ) g (within abou days, if possible in order that the application can be advertised for the public hearing calendar date of : „(QQG, 1.5-A, ). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date. You may forward the information by fax at 765-9064, however, please send the original and six sets by mail or by hand. Thank you. ( ) The map submitted does not match the information on the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval. Please submit the amendments dated directly to the Building Department for review, and if an amended Notice of Disapproval is issued, please furnish seven (7) copies with a cover letter confirming that the amended relief that is being added or revised in your request for variance(s). Thank you. (Missing information- OTHERIINFORMATION REQUESTED when possibl (7 sets with cover/transmittal see l ( ) Filing fee$ Check amount was: $ Please contact our of i e (or send new check). (` Waitvsurvey showing existing property/building details, with licensed surveyor information. ( ) Architectural map or updated survey showing dimensions of existing and proposed new �. construction areas, setbacks to property lines, and building lot coverage calculations. ( ) Rough diagram or sketch with building height (# of stories and distance from ground to top/ridge detail (and mean height, if known); also landscaping proposed in the area of the construction. ( ) Letter confirming status and date of review by other involved agencies for presubmission comments, or copy of up-to-date agency action. ( ) Updated single-and-separate search dated back to April 23, 1957 (Zoning Section 100-23D-4), and copies of deeds dating back to creation of original lot lines for this property. Thank you. • OFFICE OF - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Office Location: North Fork Bank Building—First Floor, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Mailing address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Email: Linda.Kowalski(a)-Town.Southold.ny.us Jayne.Marti n(aD-Town.Southold.ny.us (631) 765-1809 (ext. 5012 or 5011 during recording) fax (631) 765-9064 TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: ze UD .-L�t�►; DATE: r/ / a /05 RE: / /05 Agenda Item ��%( � y �-� 5793 MESSAGE: � ) Correspondence or ( ) document attached related to the above for your information Thank you. Pages attached: P� 9�0 X005 Nov 6 Mr. Scott Russell ,eo Southold Town Supervisor Main Road, Southold November 10,2005 Dear Supervisor Russell, We are writing to express our displeasure with the newly constructed fence at the intersection of Sound Road and Sound Drive.The owner appears to have allowed the fence to be built taller than legally allowed but,more important,this fence completely blocks the view for vehicles approaching this intersection.There is-no visual;clearance until vehicles, bicycles or pedestrians are practically at the-intersection. The inability to see approaching vehicles from either street has created an extremely dangerous situation. This problem exists because the fence extends too far along Sound Road completely restricting driver's vision of on-coming traffic. The volume of traffic along Sound Road is greater than many adjoining streets because of the 67 Step Beach.There are also a number of children in the area riding bicycles on the street. We are very concerned about the safety of drivers and bicyclists using this area since the fence has been built. We would greatly appreciate any assistance you could offer to remedy this worrisome situation and restore sanity and safety to this intersection. Respectfully, Maty C, Gabriel Adrianne Greenberg _ 3 Souvcl d ,� ''/P©�T At Nl*,cc. Ruth Oliva Chairwoman/Zoning,Board of Appeals Ref. File#5793/Klein;:: -� Town-of. t�grth®ld Z'SA Q App..Name Q Tax Map 0 File No. II SEOM i oard Member Michael Simon r 1. I.. i. Unliste ? Search: rf i I k... 0 Other ng,T 3:27:26 earl �ime: i er:File NmbTaMa u Ap . Name- pKlen, Geri 77 Armine Received Date: !�,-rot. Fees:, . $ 50.00 Hamlet Greenport iType: Residential I Zone: R-40 Date forwardetl to Town:Clerk' 9/26/05 ;a Statuk Incomplete M ;Action`;_ I i MeetingDates Building,Dept.°; ' I Meetin Date 1 19 06 ND Date 1 8 15 05 E pLocation:�160 Sound Avenue g. _r.� 1 Short Hearing pate f: ,ND pate 2 s Ffence 31; fence height must be max. 4 ft.; proposed I ! v hDesc.: is 6 ft. (length not provided at initial Hearin Patel ND Date,3 k ( 9 P i Hearing �. !Icopy;ik-_ ission ` ' HearingDate3 ; NDpDate,4 � � I ' Updates on survey requestedi Hearing Date,4. ND Date 5 p y for as-built fence; also I - I Notes ' to show setbacks &height within 30 ft. from corner Hearing Date 5 ,ND-_Date 61 i.- I(' (code limits to 30" high for first 30' at intersection). it i I + i Action Date:. ND'Date 7 : ,11/18/05 3o:18 AM CAPS NUM Developed`by the Southold Town Data Processing Departm je r. _ .. 'Town of`so thol-d,ZBA . O A :Name . U Tax\Ma: O-.File No. "TITsEQiui _ n ;.�r:--.:^ . - pp, i3oard;Member Michael Simon i€ ' `Cl Onliste I Search: Other Hearing Tirane: 7:26 PM i E Ei i i File`Number: 57 .:Tax Map: 33.-4-35.2 l [APO-Name: lKlein, Geri Armine Received Dater /26/2t?05. Tot:4Fees15000 Hamlet GreenportType' Residential #`Zone R-40 Date forwarded to Town Clerk .Status New f Action €.r. _'Meeting Dates Building:Dept. Location 160 Sound Avenue -Meeting-Date ND Date ^ /15/2005 Hearing Date I ND Date Short 100-231; fences must be 4 ft. in height; proposed :...._ �. r i Desc:, fence is 6 ft. r •HearinDate ND Date 1 i copy Hearing:Date ND Date , ___.... _. ...... .. k= �, _ Hearing Date ND Date f Notes., ! Hearing Date` ' `ND Date„ Action Date: , ND Date- Developed bythe-Southold Towa Data='Processing_Depa�e __ _ � may. Town o ti-uthold ZBA ° . - - _.' SE k O App. Name O Tax'Map O.File No. VII --eQRA Board Member IMichael Simon ��Tyl Search: j,❑ Other g 3:_7.6PN Hearin Time:., File_Number: 5793 Tax M.ap: 33.-4-35.2 ,App, Name: Klein, Geri Armine Received.Date: 9/26/05 ,Tot. Fees: $150.00 � , Hamlet Greenport Type: Residential Zone: R-40 Date forwarded to Town Clerk 9/26/05 Status:' NewmnT� Action• T Meeting Dates . Building Dept." _ Location: 160 Sound Ave. and Sound Rd. Meeting Date ---�€ NQ,pate 1 8/15/05 -Short100-231; fence height must be max. 4 ft.; prop. Hearing Date.1 1/26/06[ ND.`Date 2 DesI -----y! fence is 6 ft. (length &location from P/Ls not Hearing Date 2` .ND Date'3 ( c. -copy- provided on survey when submitted). ! Hearing D"ate 3. Nb bate 4 _ 12/15 received updated survey for as-built fence as Hearing Date 4 ND Date.5 No 8 `- located, sent by surveyor. Called Rob Bohn Sr. and Hearing.-Da 5. ND-Date'6 confirmed 1/26-PH - he didn't get from surveyor as Action,Date: i ,l ND eDate 7 == 12 75/05 2'3I PM GAPS NUM. Developed=by the Southold Town Data,Processingbe"pan7nent J OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ,,Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Office Location: Town Annex, NFB Building, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Ave. Southold, NY 11971-0959 - (631) 765-1809 fax (631) 765-9064 REPLY FORM �&n�d DATE: TO: ZB Ref# 5 - _ Date of Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval: ell. p The application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. Please furnish seven (7) sets of the followingt��t �_ ���t�� .LE_t) =c- /Al d-try J 0- Please furnish seven (7) sets of the following -if=po-ssT - e advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date. -- ,�� , please send the original and six sets by mail or by hand. Thank you. ( ) The map submitted does not match the information on the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval. Please submit the amendments dated directly to the Building Department for review, and if an amended Notice of Disapproval is issued, please furnish seven (7) copies with a cover letter confirming that the amended relief that is being added or revised in your request for variance(s). Thank you. �- g d4 t�O-IL�CG�t Zra�r� f,�ia � ( Missin information- OTHER/INFORMATION REQUESTED when possible (7 sets with cover/transmittal sheet) ( ) Filing fee$ ; Check amount was: $ Please contact our office (or send new check). 1)Y-0 AletJ survey showing existin91lp opertui in etv?rit �rsed surveyor information. ( ) Architectural map or updated survey showing dimensions of existing and proposed new construction areas, setbacks to property lines, and building lot coverage calculations. ( ) Rough diagram or sketch with building height (# of stories and distance from ground to top/ridge detail (and mean height, if known); also landscaping proposed in the area of the construction. ( ) Letter confirming status and date of review by other involved agencies for presubmission comments, or copy of up-to-date agency action. ( ) Updated single-and-separate search dated back to April 23, 1957 (Zoning Section 100-23D-4), and copies of deeds dating back to creation of original lot lines for this property. id 0 Thank you. Extra courtesy copies LN also send 1/11/06 to: Mr. Robert Becton 66 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 Mr. Victor Brown 64 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 �- OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Office Location: North Fork Bank Building—First Floor, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Mailing address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Email: Linda.Kowalski(&-Town.Southold.nv.us Jayne.Marti n(&Town.Southold.ny.us (631) 765-1809 (ext. 5012 or 5011 during recording) fax (631) 765-9064 TRANSMITTAL SHEET 44-X '4�"�� , , TO: " DATE: / /3 / 006 RE: l / 2-/2006 Agenda Reference ,St MESSAGE: ( ) Correspondence or ( document-attached related to the above for your information ^ y Thank you. Pages attached. 61.1 . L ��t�'s-aa[^5w�c�n��m.ry�ut�a.iuin.anuun�r�ir•III L�19MFIIV 1 _ 473889'Southold yAGtve'. - RJS:1. S'ciiool:."Rreeri 'orlt':Scliool zt Brown Wii;tor Ac £.; R oll Y_,ear,`200 jj'jC r Yi,: „'y Family Res_ Land AV 900 _ •': I +15720'"St%'nd AYe =;,_' ;0.2 acres ,.w "Add °L"and:Size> „a,.Total 'a i, �� "r �r,—a-f3'."'.p ST`.�'Rr 'i.:.:•:,�r,x"'':-` "st''4 O'wner, �rTotal: 1 » Taxati(e;Value;°' t+lrsaellane-ous. ;' f'' r.• Name; ,;.VICtOr, .,BTown, aunt ; ►° ` ' ;': 5!, ' _`, Book' fir::r'; .# •. `a., • - k,T ,,'' adaIAadr. trl%ini :,: z.82o �, '� knee: 6`d' Souriid f3df ` '' ,School„ n',4'.230` >° a). - r,r.•t jA.4, - jx x - SckilafterStar =2 780:} Greenpur,'t ;N1( .,..;;; Zip:r ':119`44` - cck`IV'4: i_', Stale;A fiokal:'01 3,t";:_ z =Site 1'of 1"'x Land`=0 of 1 + e` `Sal , t'`,� �-� 4: a D'a e, Sale=Price' ',Oatrier-ei r�"PrV cis: -�1' amil .Res'~ J ,;�- ;4Jl - ,kJkilitie- ti,tf' _ Esem"ti.fl. '9 =Total: 4 , Term` 0' u�n. 1 L t Amou iia{r: ,SvJ: Y 0'`18 [I v 801, - 41AGE -47U'0� SeJ-f�Ai: H � , Fb" e l." t ; ;s ;. ♦?�t-sx'- i: ,5 wS' rI �IC tf Gt' f _ ,.alneem nt { S ; rr Ode - _ °C e• T 'S YP, "Move Ta% QFT,=1�'r16'uilk���` W. ^1'r - n� 1' ,E'=W,Protech N'- _.1'"' ' Ti .} y^^^z �f'r `,5 F' ;,S.i�u �•.2 i. z?y.^,t� �.. OW S1rF01'1 II - T •r.. ��`Y:"" ^'2.'''-:-• :ham} 'fs1 7;: r"i, ft "7 .5 �'fY_ '�'Y:r.,r• •,}i PSS. s•'n 'Yx}� '.1^ii;; ,,�? - '�r -. —y',; a£ sir- 'i`Y' t't,w'',?;'.f, io $SA 1>� Y{t`` `+•lam ,� I al'L'- �:d '7�r•t_ t.��^'t:1s'.i= ,�w :'"��t '•I"• i`5 s ,S r;geAl' }�x - YF'r +r'i Urr-.S ,5^ �•f f +�' �'. 4 i},. 4', '•�t ,p S. - - `_kd:is `,.} -}' ..�,w ,1`„ �1`i M1'' "t>, t ,ff�i ,y m''t' •�• - t S, -- - - •a-s.:•1.=%�-�--^,,:�r=ti'.a,�;=s;',"Xtr"a,a..>�,..�.s..::<,�,;F:::#,"' w.-r-,;rrzy.:<,_r.,..� .s• _ - - - __ _ ____ _ __ _ -_ _ ...,:n.,:i'.:wL.,,..:.-. '...isaw.ra's.�.:,^-a...Y..�Y:•.,..Yr wA;..�.i..Vu�.rS....x,.,1mL.G»l:r...'w«wW ..., _ .L,�...+,.w.w r•i�'�-- - ,f'_...w4-".:-.....�-�-+.e'. w.saa",.„um "ssvmsvv.L"" .}' _- �iT++�T- 'ww"t—rr"" �} _ -_ - StanNotesZBA°A Ifcakf'o:..'i r Doc mentl'� sy' +a - '3 ..meq '� xL». `� =z.� _ - _, - - �•#g}-,: ;i. !' _ - -,— .;,„,'-�nm_,'.S^'^' •—v-.y-„...;{t,„ `—.-,_e”�,!,,7-,.T--;;'l-��r.,r.-,--�.,`+t' �� `-':a. --x-..,'-.}--..:-"�'v-';R`''�'s-�•"-''"w'.^y'. 33_-4-35.3 473889 Saiitfi�ilil' ` ' V.Activ 4' :FifS':1 Scho`ol:"-Green 'ark+SchaQl` s ': ,Cr v RoIFYear` 2x05—Curr Yr;"' y Faroil' 'Res'' -,Land "astihenos:Mary=Testament ��� u y Qun _.LandSize::1=:75;ac��es, •'1'otal,4V: 12°`6aa` '�� d;:� � 1� 't:."w" k ,.d -t.a ',T •'y. ,G,:., ,'(` i'"tY�:?;':'.:. �`;,n Oirrnei'M1'rc ',Total:"2':s - �.. rlaxa61e3�Falue:` cellaneaus' r:*,i CDunt" w3.$1"2'6110 s.4 Name: ,,Mar �Testairi&k Utstihenos- 9 Bgok., 1'2258 "#' = I.Ad Add dr: ".. '�^e,;,f.'3, s:•�a%�- t,..... •,:< 'A"' .� t,r. a, P g 24-' Street, ^i; 32 Brooks6StreSGhaol: 12;500 - :;,; ' Mort ;»` ;jy„;`=•r ¢fir ..£t{ „lJ� iy�. •, �•�, - .Bank:=:,.; ,?• .1,'�;r:�, '..,5.��'?'' �,'.F' ti,:' �3 S•,..', 'U".''fr;r+ 'i' _ s 'a: + {:sr e5: Cit `Hicksirille NY - .. Schlt`after Star.-12600 ; '` ,'. Y,x., ;,'',Zip:; '11'801 # ;. k, � :"Acct"N`o:f 1.7' ~G F. Sale Total.,'1' y' S,R& oPl Land` 0`oF;a tin' .(< ..t" .''A'�`"- Yi,.? k'. - •,t i - rV> Aii' •tiTj`. Book' ''Pa a"� 'S 616 ����• ,�: "z. �', g I ae Price O;u�rier= 'cls:,: 3 i a ��Nbad Rd"0 astihenos,'Klar J L N} t 4. S e''3A,11e% Xffe l.' 3 Y,ay. •�4 , 'ii• t• �!�d'i3ker' .�A �Y fiV (' 2> ' ''Re j. rn`thin ,:T=gym:= <;�°', ^a y7w t _ dk •ak -:fact•, r� � t - h •f.rt :l�z F _ uaL 7 ch c}: 2 - 'tr• �,sem'? i4'r= '1 ,-'SYS'* - `tw..'• 3,..t p:.'.t- k,., t lr - .F'=• -fF:,..*F a:i - S''e'ial;Distiict:< Y< : .=.T,'otal 3 ;- :: r vemeot:r_ .x.:- T'' e �. =V!ai e'•}. pp Imp.a- otalr':0'�v: =.F,> ;r,< Code.- r•�:, _ Llhr s� Rct''" Name=•.,. �,Dimt>>''�f]im2�" FD,0�1` 1P :E'=4Y rote i' -�,� �ta� .00h:- :aaa � Y� a,EV. 3' r' q q:l zxSk: i 1 - Y t.f.. '4N a i.• 'S. Q, ^jF ji d t nl •� e a F M _ A ."4 .1 YS i4 :•`o. ,a' t- - .F ,r�,� gin,.•..t .3- tar •t-2': i Y'.`-' ^r f� y'- <,c - x,11. - �+ l z'j:'.. - lir:t..-• -'•t- 1'+'Y✓ S •e e' =.3^' k' =^'!i'a =,) - 'fiat 4¢+j - _ .+54•, x ;.S4: 't: ''+ `;i•cty«els`- 4 ntl ;•�ri'd r :+1 "�5 h :d U u'ii"- tr•]"�,'4t-t -`�• t�' ,Iit�i„•sk _ _r' 'i i' -,[•; :w._ r`7a �i—.x';e_:•,.,•. ':4a=iK>`.'is ll t,y-'."t`c,Sr•.;.k N,Jt' `r�- ,,.�.,..�'-r,3,S1 qt:- V,i'- "ai'.1,�+"iPN:,.'�� f� :ia�= =tr .7', ,3 r<,. "' "-'-"'•-iG,e ,t. y„rnx ,�. -'•,el:r ,Y• - - 1: `:F•'-..' i`i �.a'+ 't tJ Y k •i, ','� •,s:, raj."s:, 6 f- jy< !„1•T „µ,1y. f� Rrd•,'.. - - _ _ - v4aA'1 �.':�n'-r^w'u::�t',6 .-4-:i•I�, R a _ � ny Start+ Inboa-==f�lp6e; E ZgA" ':JI- 11i0- ^ A plicatio, m n 1 RPSli:isro ,, ,_ P ., IDOCU e tE11; vY ry =r” ,li -rJ0"11h -� e_„ _..._�_�.—._...._.. .....e....—._.__ ......»...._._-_-_..._-_..�.:a:am..emuma,v't•+ammtvi•.-.saimxaew` Mvi:ev .w cswi 'mnwemaa'c.cw ��Xns''J'` ' r ■ rr rr - rr �• �Cr liq t °Ui�w`.,T.aoltiai =tiel' _F P y 33.-4-60 �({d73tx9: S;authdld - i4ctir�e `''FilS:1 :Schoolree'npork}Scfiool`;;,.t '. Roll Year:-2a05 :CiirYr' 1-F-'mil R'es... iL'and'-,4 :.;1; 1 UU,`. w, S 'ele',ates,Ufa"sslllos< 9, 1t1.5°'Sound Inc "£ ',an 12 •, ,t M TOf00; 0 ner`H vTotel:':2:{�'' px T*ax 1 "-i� Miscellaneous. ` =Gaunty;':j 9'1 Oa hlame:`,> '' assilios'=5"oleates' ;fl' ,,. Book: -1'1•.911`_, - ' � u1", is .100,l: `iq f e4` v,I,: .�' .«t;•31 -t `s> 'Sc`bol; ;`9100. Skreek: f4` -.P ort b :d _ f•i:z 'Bank: i, x. - ✓ :. y�, Schl`'after"Star: g y`Ua ,. C'tt5�;' .GreenportyNYI 13 :2i" ;d1`'^1.9'4'4, c r:, P•'' .:,. A ck,N'o:.1:1 .�,i - f `l"S f�I. `,i"�`'' rIY''k ,•i..n Total: 0 :; ;:, +, Site 1y'iif''1:, :ES='t' ;b'Land: 0 of<}0 Irl .Y ok= Bo .P a.�``' -Sale^D`ate`� al P" ,,- .nce�: r.Qu�ner� amilJ�Fi$s `IVbhtl C S'e�ier.C :'�r, ,`t' - .''i•, • Y.: . Waker,r _ , at d- ( 3 ° 4- r 3e` _ � r jN k Ti 'Buildin � o - �.p. 9-.:, ;:T tali° ' r0'et Y °.S 'C d ''�11TlDUYIt`" �:Yeai �P'c. _ t - 4 - _Ent •7v "�4vri,o., m•t-}`` v K - .4fi,. :5 f�� i4 "t - r'• t +4 _ Yl � 4:�'T"otal•'3' ,Im_io'vemeiit'' 1- {' ,<. Code;, 'lJrnts= f'ct,T e- Mowe'TaK" i,4 T, ''e"Cvam Dim7; Dim2r S.QF,T,>Yr'Builk Fp rotectia sr� _< G Y �.E 1:ti��S'ol d'Waste;l r :Qa „^bY; S{ ,.a, r"� t ,fix�"•'"-' ; r4'dw 'I, ,{ t '•1 .7 .( '� .i: .:. ;'w-? s•:"'- -„r< -:a.'?' .1'.o- n} k •o. } �x' F,¢ ]c�+ y4, 1 ��ti;.-� '',+,. - - t�`t ,.i•.., v'f i 'v tom':.i .a ri, a j :Stew t -d § iM',il e �Y S .fir! C E. k ✓�,: .>y lr 1 Y' -yiv5 x.Y ut`ri��,t -,i -'1,- - •`i"^±� ? .r.'1;_ '-4} �P 4 x- S,r; f.4 3, - _ _ '(. 'r•' "lam ':k "+I q _ts:Ryx'-:„` ..,^M. .%,`•�•-.�,ha�.r�,- ,4::.�v'a"», e::»YE,:.:�3�'i^a.i ....LL.»rA „3c..ti�.r .r-d 5.v,,, J:Y:.}��- Y::1%-s..� w ,3 g:,- 1 0 11:02=2 y� 7 �;wamm,aavwx.a. - Y•�4-Lamarmsr-•'----- _ n4 W t Stat' 2 b& <°M� ~.. r n iCrbsoft`Out.. ZBAA Ylcekionrinfo.' Dacumentl'=Micros..: 1?Sfe"sort . :1;102Ah W-. -R/S C KUM: ld'' ' % j�73889,`Sbu 0 yi Land-AM-x'.500' ji es pd -t.LA -1 Value Mi's'cellaneous ""Ill"'O', 'o u'NC oun y: Book' - o'? Pa'e, 0 Mort ,S 51695:'Main Y.11 t cb;N6: 17� ipk qu s (koldJfY -Z �jl§71 0 Sit6l Uiidl! 'Wofo, vvac w jmp T�, f-W m[Irpcic, Nbfid� &,6 -W a er, Ut '1" 0' -B6ildhit �FlieftkOtW T il:, 'T eim, -,w" P t taeCodd� Af�o`u­n' ear -600 T:n� ooNR i,n,� stye N ype-,-,, ar- 'Units �-,;P6t T, TP -Mov&,Ta ' W,.v fd b6d t i 6; _00 00 w 1,il 'S-b "I -,-Oo-",;,-Oo a ni ty sy LR BA- k6ti Ll."U2 Mouirnentl m,Mi&r A ANOP'i t F WZDA it; 41,"t till .......... Toolbar 6, Help. MR _64 ---' ; _ J4738 _9`So6(6Id­ Adtive", �'R)S`A` '�phopI` 'A'r�6 p fftc'� cll 7_ R611i,ear:,2005. UFf,YIffi­ `Rad' .`.7i ,RojW 79 1 AV, 3 0,;, -A d Takcibl e"V6hjq aneous, 00 Becker' Tounty:, 4 ObdftJ� B Addi. Paoe- 521" kunk 4-300 XddlnY ool- ,S ch '300%,K' 4� J, Bark: _N ew J"A "NY" -Zip-- J6024 o:- Acot: -1 T x .0 sitel OU 1, Sale A Tota1.0 Pa 'Piice, Pr ,ck�, If' a ,�QW er - �I ��I (00 BOO p ,g 14bhd CdA-­y ga,­'_' J j W, a er- Jtilitie A, u w otm, ;,Term.'geinptiom; : --,,T,' t6[ 00,- ` �(ui I png;,,,�, -, T N Z' 4, T A-4 n To'ta 3tr au Im qyjp�_ya nit$ ype.,. Y(Buil P� t t_,_ FD031',­9-,-! ro echo 00: " 00, WOO -s A ta �A 6 id IF, ifiwV t6n 6 ocumc 11 2 tj QCRP� 60rcAt P4pplida 1