The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-10-3-89-128-2-12Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 1Q'r3'~.89'r.128'r2-12 DATE: December_g2, 19~ ISSUED TO RUSSELL IRELAND Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893: and Chapter 404 of the L.aws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Or&nance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 19_.8~..., and in consideration of the sum of $ .......... paid by of .................................................................................. N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions llsted on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Reconstruct 30' Groin located in Peconic Bay at Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, NY all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating appllcaf[on. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes ifs Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this daf, e. TER~S ~nd C-ONDmONS Russell Ireland residlngat P. O. Box 231~ East Norwich, NY 11732 N.Y. as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and pt~etibe to the fol- lowing: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or dalmg for darr~ges, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any opor- arion performed pursuant co this permit, and the said Permi~'te~ wilL, at his or her own expense, defend any and ail such suits i~itiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 2 4 mos. which is comidered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circmnstances win'rant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 5. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishas to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that auth- orization was originally obtained. 4. That .the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the origlngring application, may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along r_he beach between high and Iow water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstrucnon to free navigation, the said Petmittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work or project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southokk 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee ot the completion of the work auth- orized. 9. That the Permirtee will obtain ali other permits and comenrs that may be required sup- plemental to this permit which may be subject ~:o revoke upon failure to obtain same. GAlL S. SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATe STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of STATE AlBaNY, N.Y. 12231-0001 October 30, 1989 Mr. Roy L. Haje Eh-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: F-89-644 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application Russell Ireland Town of Southold Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Haje: Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. The groin as seen from the photograph is deteriorated and non-functional. TO be reconstructed as it was, would interrupt littoral drift and sand by-passing. The result would be erosion of the down drift beach. This is not compatible with Coastal Policies #12 and 14. I would suggest that a low profile groin be constructed. Please explore this alternative. Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.60(a), the review of your consistency certification will begin after we receive and determine that the necessary data and information is adequate to assess coastal zone effects. Any additional information which you believe will facilitate our consistency review of this project would be appreciated. A copy of this letter has been sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Fr. Roy Haje October 30, 1989 Page 2 Please call me at (518) 474-3642 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mohabir Persaud' Coastal Processes Technical Specialist MP:ak cc: COE/NY District - Michael Infurna NYS DEC/Region I - Robert Greene Town of Southold - Frank Kujawski CENAN-OP-RE APPLICATION NO. 89-0996-L2 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 13857-89-0996-L2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK TgAe applicant, Mr. Russell Ireland, has requested Department of the Army authorization to construct a timber groin in Great Peconic Bay at Laurel, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York for the stated purpose of controlling erosion at the project site. The work would involve the construction of a 30 foot long timber groin in the same location as an existing non-functional groin. Publ o Notlo® The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U,SoCo 403)° APPLICANT: l%r. Russell Ireland P~O~ Box 231 East Islip, New York 11730 ACTIViT~-: Construct a timber groin Great Peconic Bay LOCATI(kN: Laurel, Suffolk Count¥~ New York A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist 'in your review. The dec~sion whether to issue a permit will be based on a~ evaluation Of the probable impact, including C~mulative impacts, of the activity on the public interest. T~lat decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. ~11 factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetl~rlds, cultural values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation~ water quality, energy needs~ safety~ food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. ALL C0~SREGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE piRF=PARMD IN WRITING AND ~ILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPII~ATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE~ otherwise~ it will be presumed that there objections to the activity~ are no Any person may request, in writing, before ~his public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. ~ANY ~ FL- 129 ~Ug 89 Pursuant to Section 7 of -~%e ~ldahngered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 153i} and based upon a review of the latest pz~btished version of the ~hreatened ~nd end, gered species listings a preliminary determination is that the activity ~hnder consideration will not affect those species listed or their critical habitat° Based -upon a review of the latest published version of %he National Register Of Historic Places~ there are no }~ sites etig~bte for~ or included in, the Register within the permit area~ ~resently ~kno~ archaeological= scientific~ prehistorical or historical clara may be lost ~- work accomplished ~%der the required permit. Reviews of activities p~rsm~_~t to Section 40A of the Clean Water Act will include application of the ~ideiines prom~Igated Dy the A~inistrator~ U~S~ ~r~iro~m~ental Protectio~ Agency~ ~%der antkoritk- of Section 404{b} of the Cle~ W~ter /~ct ~d the ai~Diics~/g will Obtain a water ~ality certificate or -{~'siver from ~%e appropriate state agency in accordance with Section ~l of th~ Cie~ ~Jater D~ct prior to a pe~it ~ecision: ~ursuant to Section 307{c) of the Coastal Zone )~nagsment Act of 1972 as amended [16 UoS.C~ i456(c}]~ for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a st~;e which has a federally approved coastal zone m~magement progr~ the applic~-nt has certified in the permit application that the activity co~Dlies ~ith~ ~=m_d will be conducted in a ~er that is consistent with~ the approved state co~tal zone m~agement progr~. By -~his p~lic notice~ ~e are requesting the state's concurrence ~ith= objection to~ or ~aiver of the ~Dplic~t ~S certification~ ~o ~it ~ecision ~iit be made ~til one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone York State~ ~e appiic~lt~.s certification ~ld accomp~ing info.erich is avait~le from the Consistenc~ Coordinator~ ~ew York State Depar~ent of State~ Division of Coastal Resources ~nd Waterfront Revitati z~tion ~ Coastal Zone ~[s~agem~t Progr~ ~ i~ 2 Washington Avenue Alb~y~ ~ew York 1223t~ ~elepkone {5tS} ~74-3642. Cemm~e~ts regarding ~e app!ic~}.t~s certification should be se addressed~ In addition to ~ny required water ~aa!ity certificate ~ coastal zone m~nagement program concurrence~ the applicant has obtained or requested the follo~ing governmental an~lorization for ti%e activity consideration= N.Y. State Dept. of F~nviror~entat Cor~e~ation Tidal Weti~nds Permit TO~ of Southeld Permit It is requested ~nat you com~unicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons kno%~_ by you to be interested and ~mho did not receive a copy of this notice. If yom have any questions concerning this application~ yom may contact this office at (~12) 264-3912 ~ ask for Mr~ ~ichael infnrna. FOR ~qE DiSTrICT Jose~l J. Seebode Chief, Re~iatery ~r~ch ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., ~i~-~ JOHN M. BREDE~IEYER. III · President JOHN L. BEBNOSKI. JR. HENRY P. SMITH, Vice President John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 January 5, 1990 En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: App. No. 10-3-89-128-2-12 Dear Mr. Haje: / Russell Ireland The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on Decen~er 21, 1989 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Russell Ireland applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 6, 1989 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on December 21, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation 'submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE RESOLVED that En-Consultants ON BEHALF OF Russell Ireland BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: Reconstruct 30' timber groin located in Peconic Bay at Peconic Bay Blvd, Laurel, NY. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Very truly yours, ~John M. Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB:jb CC: Bldg. Dept. Conservation AdVisory Council file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., Presiden[ ALBERT J. KRUPSKI. JR., Vicc-Presidem JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 November 22, 1989 En-Consultants, Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southohampton, NY 11968 Subject: Fee, application No. 10-3-89-128-2-12 Russell Ireland Dear Mr. Haje: Your request for a waiver on the above-numbered application was denied on October 19, 1989. The Trustees re-assessed the application on November 16, and will conduct a Hearing on December 21, 1989 if payment for the application fee is received by December 7. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, President, Board of Trustees FAK: jb FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 10, Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold. Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapf~l: 1989 Transmitted herewith is a waiver request submitted by Russell Ireland. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. FAK: jb Very truly yours, pFrreasn~deA;tKujawsk'~- Board of Town Trustees FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M, BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516] 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O~Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 NOTICE OF HEARINGS ON WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ON THURSDAY~ December 21, 1989, ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PEP~4ITS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN. 7:30 P.M. - In the matter of the intended designation of the following creeks as Critical Environmental Areas: Brushes Creek, Cedar Beach Creek, Corey Creek, Deep Hole Creek, Goldsmith's Inlet, Halls Creek, Horseshoe Cove, Little Creek~ Mill Creek (Arshamomaque), and Pipes Neck Cove Creek. Maps for these creeks are available for review in the Town Trustees' office. 7:31 P. M.- In the matter of the application of Peconic Associates, Inc. on behalf of Youngs Marina, Sage Blvd., Greenport, NY to maintenance dredge approximately 100 cubic yards from existing channel and extend existing sheet steel bulkhead 45' to prevent further erosion. 7:32 P. M. In the matter of the application of Eh-Consultants on behalf of Russell Ireland to reconstruct 30' timber groin located in Peconic Bay at Peconic Bay Blvd, Laurel, NY. 7:33 P. M. In the matter of the application of Richard and Patricia Snow to construct a 3' x 30' catwalk, and authorize existing bluestone paved area on property located at 1585 Long Creek Drive, Southold, NY. 7:34 P. M. In the matter of the application of Eh-Consultants on behalf of Robert Fairlie to construct 4' × 65' elevated fixed dock, extending from bulkheadw property located on Jockey Creek at 3765 Willis Ave., Southold, NY. 7:35 P. M. In the matter of the application of En-Consultants on behalf of Philip Rodilosso to construct a 4' x 30' fixed elevated walk (to be attached to existing catwalk), relocate ramp and existing floats westward, add 6' x 30' float in "L" configuration. Project located in Eugene's Creek at 1200 Beebe Drive, Cutchogue, NY. 7:36 P. M. In the matter of the application of En-Consultants on behalf of William and Vincent Geraghty to place a maximum of 1000 cubic yards of fill on existing filled areas, then to be graded and seeded. Property is located on Main Road~ Southold, NY. 7:37 P. M. In the matter of the application of Robert Keith to~ create a buffer zone with plantings, and cutting phragmites to 12" height landward of high tide bushes on property adjacent to Deep Hole Creek at Willis Creek Drive, Mattituck, NY. 7:38 P. M. In the matter of the application of Roscoe Corey to construct 2' x 35' catwalk 18" high across marsh grass to waters edge, 6' x 4' dock, and install necessary pilings. Property is located on Cedar Beach Harbor at 830 Clearview Road, Southold, NY. ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN SAID MATTERS SHOULD APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE HEARING. Dated: November 28, 1989 Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees By: Jane Blados, Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, THURSDAY, December 7, 1989 AND FORWARD ONE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, 11971. Copies to: L.I. Traveler-Watchman, Suffolk Times, Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS ~OVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICANT'S NAME: Russell Ireland DATE October 4, 1989 TEL. NO. 922-5'530 MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 231, East Norwich, New York 11732 AGENT: Eh-Consultants, Inc. TEL NO. 283-6360 AGENT ADDRESS: 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, New York 11968 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: Remove a~d replace (in same location and configuration) a 30' long timber ~roin~/~'~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel HAMLET:- Laurel TAX MAP NO: 1000-128-2-12 CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: Great Peconic Bay See project description WIDTH: LEPHONE L6) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOW3~ TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION ISHEREBY 5IADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICANT'S NAME: Russell Ireland DATE October 4, 1989 TEL. NO. 922-5530 MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 231, East Norwich, New York 11732 AGENT: Eh-Consultants, Inc. TEL NO. 283-6360 AGENT ADDRESS: 1329 North Sea Road, Southampton, New York 11968 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: Remove and replace (in same location and configuration) a~ 30' lonq timber ,groin. ~~~. LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel HAMLET:- Laurel TAXMAP NO: 1000- 128-2-12 CREEK, BAY OR HAP~BOR FRONTING PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: Great Peconic Bay See project description WIDTH: YDSi TO BE EXCAVATED: 0 YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: 0 N/A WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: 0' AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: N/A DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONING: A-40 IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: No change DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: 10+ miles 2'-6" USE: Private None known. HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: None known. HAs ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: No DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: N/A DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: N/A ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: None WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: See attached 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be. completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR in2~ .PROJECT NAME Russell Ireland by Eh-Consultants, 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munlcisal~ty Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurelcounl:y Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION [Street address and road intersections. 3rominent landmarks, e~c., or prowde map, Remove and replace (in same location and configuration) a 30' long timber groin. 5, IS PROPOSED ACTION: ~ New [] Exoanslon [] Modification/alteration 6, DESCRISE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Peconic Bay Boulevard, Laurel SCTM No. 1000-128-2-12 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initiahy i acres Ultimately 1 acres WILL PROPOSED ACT[ON COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~ Yes [] No ~f No. describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~[Residential [] !ndustriai [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/ForestlODen space ~ ethel Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERlvliT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals DEC, COE, DOS 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes ~] No If yes, list agency name and permit/al 3reval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes ~ NO r CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUB TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEeGE Applicant/sponsor name: Russet~ Irelan~ by En-Consultants, Inc~ Date: 10/2/89 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRON~*'-%ITAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEEd, ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL E~AF~ []Yes [] No ' ' e. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, ~ negative declaration may be superseded by another invotved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WiTH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or'groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste product[on or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other naturaJ or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? ExpJain brief]y: C4. A community's existing plans or goals ss officially sdopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly· C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (inclUding changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OFt IS THERE LIKELY TO SE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude, if necessary, add attachments or reference supporting matedaJs. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequateJy addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Date 2 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) Roy L. Haje BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FORT HE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS ~PLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OFT HE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGFI~T ORREPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signatur Appli~a~t SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 3 . , 19 ~ N0. OlD~gL~[~u~, ~erm Expires Jaiy 20, EX~4INED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION , Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: 'This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proDosed may have a significant eft on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be conside as 6art of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additic information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invo new studies, research or investigation. If information requtring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. - . NAME OF ACTIC~ LOCATION OF ACTION tlncJude Street Address, Municmaldy an{3 County) Peconic Bay Boulevard, La~i- NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR B~ensultants, Inc. ADDRESS · 329 N~rth-Sea Road BUSINESS TELEPHONE 61.6~ 283-§360 CiTY/PO ~oa~hampton~ NAME OF OWNER (If different) Russell Ireland ADORESS P. O. Box 231 CJTY/?O Eas~ Norwich. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Remove and -replace 'timber groin. STATE ~JP CODE N.Y. I 11968 I8US~NESSTELE?HONE 616 ) 922-5530 STATE I ZIP CODE N.Y. 11732 (in same location and configuration) a 30' long Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both develosed and una~veloped areas. 1. Present land use: I~Urban I'~lndustrial [3Forest [3Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushlano [Nomagricultura ] Forested [3Commercial E3Other t~Residential (suburban) []Rura (non-far: ,//a,~/ea/. acre PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION · 7 acres .7 .2 acres .2 Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 el ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated {Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other( ndicate typek, Landscaped 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project s~te? Sand, loam a. Soil drainage: E3~VVel drained 100 °,6 of s~te ~,%loderately well drained ?S of site ~,PoorJv drained b. If any agricultural land~smvolved how manv acres of soil are classdied within soil grouo Land Classdication System? acres. ~See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there oedrock outcroppings on prelect site.;' ~Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? Unknown [in feet) 2 14'-16;.2 [2/87i-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, manywho have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFiCANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part2 ' [~Part3 Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: r-1 A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which wi][ not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant ef~'ect on the environment, there will ~ot be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C, The proiect may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Respuns~ble Otficer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) 1 5. 'Approximate oerd~-~,&a~e of proposed project site with slopes: ~0-10% 100 -:~' [10-15%. · ' [15% or greater °,6 (?. Is~ prbjec-t substantiaHv contiguous to. or contain a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the Nationa Registers of Historic Places? FiYes 7. ls proiect substantially contiguous to a s~te listed on the Register of National Nato roi Landmarks? ~.'Yes 8. What is the depth of the water tabie? ,5+ (in feet} 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? :~[]Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opDortunities presently exist in the project area? ~Yes ~No 11. Does prolect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangereu~ []-]Yes ~No According to Roy L, ~aje Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or ~nusual land forms on the proiect site? (i.e., cliffs· dunes, other geological formations ~Yes Eg, No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the commumtv or neighborhood as an open space or recreation- area? E]Yes [~No If yes, explai~ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known ~o be important to the commJnlrv? [~Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~one a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it ~s tnbutar~ 16. Lakes. ~onds. wetland areas within or co0uguous to proiect area: a. Name Great Pecon~c Bay b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by~xisting public utilities? [Yes ~No al If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? r~Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ENo 'i6 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets La,v, A~:ticle 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? []Yes -~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6~77 ~Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lyes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 acres. b. Project acreaRe to be developed: 1 acres initially; 1 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. 1[ the project is an expans on. indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A (upon completion of project}? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially N/A Ultimately i. Dimensions(in teat) of largest proposed structure 3' height; .width; 30' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wdl occupy i~,¢ N/A ft. 2. How much r roi material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 t~ns/cubic ;yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [~Yes []No ~]N/A a. If yes, for what intend..,; purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~]Yes E3No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E3Yes 4. How many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, ground covers) svill be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I~Yes ~No - - 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 2 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: gl/A a. Total number of phases anticipated {number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of fina[ Phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? F-lYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [E]Yes E~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [Yes [~No If yes, explain year, (including demolition). year: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~tYes [~No' a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount ' b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes [~No Type 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain []Yes 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E~Yes 16. Will the proiect generate so[id waste? [Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the amotmt per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes E~No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~No Z]No 17. Will the proiect involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesti~:ides? OYes [~Yes ~]No tons/month. years, 19. Will project routinely produce odors [more than one hour per day)? [Yes 20. Wdl project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes [g]No If yes , indicate type[s) []Yes ~No 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23, Total anticipated water usag~ per day ~/A gallons/day. 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~]Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. 4 '25.' .(%pprovals Type - City,.Town, Village Board [~Yes []No ' City', Town, Village Planning Board [Yes ~]No City. Town Zoning Board dYes [~No CiW, County Health Department [~Yes {~No Other Local Agencies []Yes DNa Other Regional Agencies l~]Yes I-qNo State Agencies aYes I-iNa Federal Agencies I~Yes ~]No DEC TW COE Section 10 Submittal Date 10/89 10/89 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: i-lzoning amendment I-qzoning variance I-Ispecial use permit ~]subdivision ~)site plan E~new revision of master plan I-~resource management plan r-~other 2. What is the zomng classification{s)of the site? A Residential 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4, What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A - 5.~ What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the ~roposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses q adooted local land use plans? [~Yes 7. What are the predominant ]and use{s] aaa zomng classifications within a % mile radius or prooosed action? A Residential 8. Is the proposed acuon compatible with adjoining]surrounding land uses within a ~¼ mile? ~Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for a~y community provided services (recreation, education, police fire protection)? [Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? I-lYes ~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? []Yes I~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are or may be any advers~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o avoid them. E. Verification ~ I cerdfy that the info~'ma~Jon ~r~ovic~d above is true to Applicant, Sponsor Name t /~uss, el//Ireland the best of my knowledge. Date . 10/4/89 1{ ,he action is in~C~a; ,e agency, l',e the Coastal Assessment Form before'proceeding with this assessment. 5 --' Part 2--'PROJECT 1~71PACTS AND THEIR MA,.NiTUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and'determinations be reasonable.~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simp asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types ot impacts and wherever, possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable tt~roughout the State ar for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropria for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative ar have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questic · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. -, -- Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of th impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds an,/example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshoi is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderar impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible_ Thi fnust be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? []NO [ZYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the ware( table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved ]parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on /and where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 f~et of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2 Will there be an effect ts. -..W ur,;que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)~NO [YES · Speofic land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ElVes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] QYes []No ~ [] ~2Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E]¥es EgNo 50 WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I authorize En-Consultants~ Inc. to apply for penmits on ~y behalf. CHECK OFF LIST FOR APPLICATIONS - 1. Date ADplication Fee Paid: 2. Paid $55.00 Waiver Fee with request letter: 3. ~nsDeotion date:rO//¢- ' ' ~,~ 5. Date sent to CAC: 6. 7. Declared Lead Agency: g. D.E.C. 1Permit/ Letter % 9. Army Cord Permit: 11. Determination: / / / / / / / / / / / / AREA =-45,402 sq. ft. TO TIE LINE ./ CERTIFIED TO: JAMES. IRELAND SUR VE Y OF PROPERTY / / / / / / 1410t~ ~oS~ ~0s~ / / A T LAUREL /" : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. ~ 1000- 128 02-;12 '~°*~ ~oO~ ~ "~" Scale 1"-= 40 .. ~ Sept. 21, 1989 pt~us Pr~a~ in ~r~ge with the ~