The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-4424Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. Z,,.J (/¢~/,/ DATE: ....3/30/95 .... ISSUED TO ..... A.u h rizatio. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of {'he Sta~'e of New York 1952; and {'he Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted et a meeting held on 19 9.5., and in consideration of the sum of $ 958..00 paid by JOSE?~. Of .... l~econic N.Y. and subject {'o {'he Terms and OondH'ions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Sou{'hold Town Trustees authorizes and permits {'he following: Rebuild and extend ~n existing bulkhead out 18" with a 20' non-tturf, non-fertilzed buffer landward ~vith a 4 1/2' return, plus add on a 3' X 40~ catwalk, elev. 4' above grade with a 2 1/2' X 12' ramp lea.din, g ~o a 6' X 20~. fl.o. at. Richmond Creek ail in accordance wlfh fha detalJed specifications as present'ed in the originating applicafion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corpora~'e Seal ~'o~ be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a maiority of the said Board as of this da~'e. ALL DOCKS AND BULKt~:DS MUST DISPLAY VISIBLE PF~M~ IT NUMBERS. ALL MOORINGS AND ST~V.~ MUST DISPLkY'VISIBLE MOORING NUMBERS. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ~971 NOTICE OF ACTION - NOT A PERMIT TO: JOSEPH IAVARONE Please be advised that your application, dated December 15~ t994 has been reviewed by this Board, at a meeting of the Trustees held on March 30, i994 and resulting in the action, as indicated below: ( XXX ) Application Approved, ) Application Denied. ) Application Tabled. COMMENTS AND REMARKS: Catwalk: Ramp: Float: 3' X 40' = 120' X $3 = $360 3' X 12' = 36' X $3 = $108 6' X 20' = 120' X $3 = $360 TOTAL DUE: $828 IF YOUR APPLICATION IS APPROVED ABOVE, A PERMIT FEE I~x~NOW DUE, AND SHOULD BE .MADE PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES. THIS FEE IS COMPUTED BELOW ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE OF RATES AS SET FORTH IN THE INSTRUCTION SHEET (Form 1/1). THIS FEE MUST BE PAID WITHIN 90 DAYS OR REAPPLICATION A.ND ADDITIONAL FEE WILL BE NECESSARY. IF THE PERMIT FEE IS PAID IN PERSON TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD, THE PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINABLE AT THE SAME TIME. IF THE FEE IS PAID BY MAIL, THE PERMIT WILL BE MAILED IN REPLY. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEE: Application Fee: $150.00 Paid Dock Fees: $828.00 Due TOTAL FEE FOil THIS APPLICATION: 10/87 Albert J. Kmpski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President W'flliam G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sonthokk New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 30, 1995, 1995 Joseph Iavarone I5 Cherry Lane Syosset NY 11791 Re: SCTM 986-6-4 Dear Mr. Iavarone, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on March 30, 1995 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, JOSEPH IAVARONE applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated December 15, 1994 and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and . WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 30, 1995, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WI~EREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 37-18 of the Southold Town Code, which will be listed on a separate page, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approves the application of JOSEPH IAVARONE to rebuild and extend an existing bulkhead out 18" with a 20' non-turf non-fertilized buffer iandwa~d with a 4 & 1/2' return, plus add on a 3' X 40' catwalk elevated 4' above grade with a 2 1/2' X 12' ramp leading to a 6' X 20' float. Permit to construct project will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of Said project. FEES: catwalk: 3' X 40' = 120' X $3 = $360 ramp: 3' X 12' = 36' X $3 = $108 float: 6' X 20' = i20' X $3 = $360 TOTAL DUE: $828 Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh cc. CAC Albert J. Krupski. President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Gan'ell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S,E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECL~RATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1000-86-6-4 NAME: JOSEPH IAVARONE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1995 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type: I DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant requests permit to rebuild and extend existing bulkhead out 18" plus add on a 4' X 40' catwalk, with a 2 1/2' X 12' ramp leading to a 10' X 20' float. Located 405 Wood Lane, Peconic. LOCATION: SCTM ~1000-86-6-4 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the enviroDment are likely to occur should the following mitigation measures be implemented. cc. CAC DEG DOS Telephone (516) 765-1801 TO: FROM: DATED: RE: SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council January 23, 1995 -Recommendation of Applications Town Hall. 53095 M~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 A meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council was held Monday, January 23. 1995 at Southold Town Hail. Present were CAC Chairman Step, hen Angell and GAG memoers Robert Keith. Jack Hagerty. Patricia Isaksen. Allan Connell and Betty Wells. RECOMMENDATION OF WETLAND APPLICATIONS No. 1216 " Moved by Allan Connell, seconded by Jack Hagerty , it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH SUGGESTIONS of the Wetland Application of JOSEPH AND JUNE IAVARONE, JR. 86-6-u. to extend existing bulkhead out 18" plus add on u,0' catwalk with a 2 1/2' x 16' ramp leading to a 20' x 10' float.' The Council suggests the applicant let the bulkhead deteriorate and plant with spartina. If the applicant insists on replacing the bulkhead the CAC recommends approval with the following stipulations: ~ 1. Returns on both sides 2. Have an engineer' plan on the proper reinforcement so it does not fail as:the current bulkhead, 3. Maintain a buffer behind the bulkhead. The Council approves the catwalk, float and ramp as submitted. 405 Wood Lane, Peconic Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. No. 1217 Moved by Stephen Angell. seconded by Jack Hagerty. it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of MICHAEL KEELY 79-1-3 to construct 75 +/- t.f. of timber retaining wall with (2) 8' returns. ~ J. Kmpski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel TO: BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OEPAR~N7 OF STATE ~AST~ PR~ Town ~ ~ ~ ~_ 53095 ~ Road JAN ~ ~ ,~,~ P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 F~ (516) 765-t823 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST WHOM IT MAY CONCERN DATE: JAN 2 3 l.c~ Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part ! of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southo!d Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQt~ALead Agency for: NAME: JOSEPH & JOAN LAVARONE LOCATION: 405 Wood Lane, Peconic, TAX MAP: 1000-86-6-4 DESCRPTN: (See attached) PERMIT REQUIRED: ~ TOW/q WETLA/qD ( SEQP~ CLASSIFICATION: (~ Type i ( ) UNLISTED 1,000 ft. off Ondian Neck La. PEP~MIT $ Pending ) O_.~HER ( ) TlrPe I! ~ CEA Please contact Aibert 3. Krups~, Trustee President, w~i~30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees/(W~]J/(DO NOT WANT) to assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS (~ DEC ~ DOH ( ) ~B ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) ACE (5) W, ~3~/C ~ Please complete, detach and return this fermi to processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: . Trustees asguming Lead Agency. Commenus/Reasons: expedite to Southo!d Town ~orized Repres~tative Albert J. Krupsld, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southotd. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~--Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application Trustee Lands Permit Application RWaiver /~/~ / ec~ved Application:., '/I Clericai Review: /~/t~/~'~ ~_Comp!eted Application ~Incomplete /~.,,/~d~,/?~ ' / ' |SEQRA Classification: I~rpe I ~ Type. II Unlisted. Coordination.:(date seDt). ;~/~---/~ CAC Referral .Sent:. /~/t~./~'~'/~ Date of Inspection. / Receipt of CAC Report: (date~, Lead Agenc!~ Determination; ~_TechnicaI Review: (date). ~/1.~ Public Hearing: (date}J;~b; ¶~' ' Decision: Approved (Y/N) (o~ate) A p i atlon Suffolk County Tax Map N~er: 1000 - &; ¢ ~ S ~' Property Location: ~ ~¢ ~ ¢ YCC¢~Jt '~ ( If applicable Address: Phone: ~rd of Trustees Applicatic%~/ Land Area Area Zoning: ~O~C~ ~ Previous use of property: Intended use of property: GENERAL DATA ~in s~e :~ee'~: i0(~ ~,500' - 50 000 Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date // No prior permits/approvals for site improvements° revoked or suspended v/No Yes by a %ts if necessary): ,..,cf.- 1 ¢ '~ '¢ ]? ,,,C¢..,~,¢ .c,x'~Owo ~.~rd of Trustees Applicati~/ County of Suff61k State of New York DEPOSES ANDAFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY '~E SOU~OLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES~ THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD T~E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLEss AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND cLAIMs ~si~s. tm-~ER o~ B~ VIR~EO~SAID PE~T(S), ZF s~. IN ¢O~E~xNs THIS APPLICATION, I ~E~~-~A~OZ~ZE ~ THEIR AGENTIS) ORREPEESENTATIVES(S), TO EBT'~R ONTo MYPROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. / / ! Notary ~ublic ~_~oard of Trustees Applicati~; WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: ~-~ ~ ~W}[ ~ Area of wetlands on lot: 9~)(~ square feet Percent coverage of lot: ~/ % Closest distance between ngarest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~-~ feet Closest distance between ~earest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: %1~ feet involve cavation or filling? Does the pro~ect vo±ve/eX If yes, how much material will be excavated? ~$N~ cubic yards How much material will be filled? ~ cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: / ~/~f~ feet ~ ~iH~-6~ Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ~/~ Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: ~A~ Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason os such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): 6 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SEQ; SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 3. PRO3ECT LOCATION: ' - ' 5. IS PROP D ACTION: ~ [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: AMOUNT OF LAN~FFECTED; Initially ~ acres Urtimate~y ~ ~/~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WiTH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS2 Yes [] No If No describe briefly WH IS PRESENT LAHD USE 'N VICINITY OF PROJECT? esidentisl [] !ndustri~l [] Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10, DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHEE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ~Yes No If yes, J~st agency(s) and permit/approvals It. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes r~No If yes, list agenc~ name and ~ermit/apDroval 12. AS A RESULT OE PROPOSED ACTION WiLL EX[STING PERMiT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE 8 OVER' 1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a._s~essment PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL A,c'~"~SSMENT ~To be completed by Agency) A. OdES ACTION E~EED ANY TYP~. I'THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process ~d use the FULL [] Yes No . B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN. 6 NYCRR. PART 617.67 if No. a negative de¢la~alJo~ may be superseded by another involved agency, Yes L~J No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may De handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or'ground~vater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding ~roblems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character?. Explain briefly- C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or inter~sity of use of la,id or other ~atula~ resources? Explain briery C5. Growth. suosequent development, or related activities likely 1o De induced by the proposed actioB? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS.THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIALADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [~No If Yes. exolain briefly PART III--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessea in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rurat); (D) proea~bHity et occur'lng; (c) duration; (d) Jrreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude, if necessary, add attachments or reference supper[my mar'calais. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to shew that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more 30tentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive-declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documen[at~on, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in~3,ny significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supped:ting this determination: State Environmental QuaRry Review ~ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: '[he full EAF is designed to held applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, ~ether a project or action maybe significant. ]he question Qf whethe~ an action may be significant is not always easy to ~wer.'Frequent- ly there are aspect~ of ~ pro~ect that are ~b~ctive or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who significance m~v have ItlJe. or no formal k.,, ,~,~ edge of the environment or may ~e technically expert in enviro~mefltal analysis. InaddJiion, many who h~ve knowledge in one par[Jcular area may not be aware of the broader concerns afTecting the question of significance. [he full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that thedetermina[ion p[ocess has been brderly, comprehensive in nature, vet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project o[ action. Full EAE Components: The full EAF is comprised of three Darts: Part 1: Progi~s obiective data and information about a g~ven project and its site. By identifyJ, g basic projecl d~ t~. it assist~ a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: F?cuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides ~iJidanc& as to whe'ther an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whethe~t is a potentially- large impac~L. The form aJse identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced Part 3: Jf any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the imoa~t i~ actL~allv imnortant DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted'A~:lions Identify lhe Po~lions.;0f,'EAF compleled [or this project: [] Part 1 ' '~ f~: :Pa~t'~.~ ~[]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF [Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other suppor~in~ information ~nd considering both t re magitude and mportance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead ag-enc~, that: ..... [] A. The project will not result in any large and important mpact(s] and, therefore, rs one which will nol have a gignificant irt pact on the environment, therefore a negalrve deelaral o will lee prepared. [] B. Although the project coold have a signif'cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have ~ee~ required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared,* [] C. The project may resolt in one or more large and imnortant impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive dec~aratlon w'll be prepa~e~, * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is ~onlv valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action : ': . Name of Lead Agency . . . Print or TypeN~'~e ~f Responsible Officer in Lead AgenCy -Title of Resp,oo~ible Officer Signature Of Rest)onsihle Officer in Lead Agenc'~ - S gnature of Preparer (If d fferent from responsible offh:er] Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE:,, This docnment is designed to assist in determming whether the/actio,n proposed may have a s~gnificant effect on the envirom3'aent Please complete tile entire form Parts 3, through £. Ans'Aers to these q~ms(ions wJli be considered as parCof the andlication'fb~ ~pprov~,l and mav bYsubiect to further verification and p0blic review/Prox idea'ny additional information you believe will be needed to comnlete Parts 2 and 3. It is exnected that comoletion of thof'JH EAF will be dm~eedeet on information currentl; available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information reqmrmg such additional work is unavailable so indicate and specify each instance qAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION ~ncluoe Slreet Address. Municioality and County) qO% WOOd LC d, ADDRESS CiTY/PO - 5Hosset NAME O~ OWNER (If diff~ent) EPHONE ADDRESS CIT~ PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION STATE ZIP CODE Please Complefe Each question--Indicate N.A. it nol applicable A. Site Description Phvsical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.,,/ 1. Present land use: E3Orban E31ndustriat ~Commercial [5~sidential (suburban) ~Forest E3Agric~lture E]Other 2 Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, crol~lanb, gasture, etc,) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per 3,rticles ~4, 25 of ECU Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or filh Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) ~Rural trion-farm} PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres (~ acres acres acres acres .-~'~t~ acre~ ,OC~ acres acres acres ~ acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 3 What is predominant soil.~.ype(s) on project site? ¢~' $o~/_ a. Soil drainage::- . [~Vell drained _~_~.O % of site ~Moderatel,~ well drained % bf site E~PoorJv drained % of site b if any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are ciassified within sci[ group I through 4 of th~ NYS Land Classific.ation System? acres. [See I NYCRR ?~70). v a Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~)~o a. What is depth to bedrock? [in feet)r 2 ..... . ~ % ~c~% jO % S. Approximate pert _ntage o~ proposed I~ro eot s~te w~Lh 6. Is proiect substantially contlguouF t? or co~tain ~ ~uilding, site. or-Oisttict listed on the State or the Nationa 8. What s t~e de,th of the water tabu? hunti ~, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~Yes ~No 10~ Do 11 Does proipct site ~on't~in any ,~ies of pl~'nt or animal life that i~ identified as/~(hr~atened ~ endangered? Identifx each species 12 Are ther~ any unique or'unusual land forms on the ~roject site~ [i.e., cliffs, dunes, ,other ~eelo~ic~l fo~matidns) ~Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the prolect slt~/~presently used. by the commumtv or neigbborhood as an,open space or recreation area? E3Yes :~,~o If '/es, eXplain 14. Does the present site ~nclude scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ~No 15. Streams within or conuguous to project area: a. Name'of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds wetland aj[~a~ ~vithiri o~:"c6ntig'oobs' to'ffroj~:t ~r~: ............ 17. Is the site served bV existin~ ~ublic utilities~ ~es ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes ~No ~ b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ~No ~ 18_- Is the' site loCated in an agri'cul~ur~t]district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets La~, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes ~o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~No ~ 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1 Physical dinrensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor / acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: , ~O ~ acres initially; · ~'~" acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped * ~''~ acres. d. I.ength of project, in miles: i ~)~:)/i~ (If'appropriatel e, If th~ projec~t is an exoansi~n; indicate percent of expansion proposed , ~O~' %, .f. N_.umber ~f c;if-sb:~'~'t oa[[d~?g s~aces ekist~ng ~ propdsed g Ma~im~J;~'~h'i~ula~ trips genera~ n~r h'0(if" ~ -~ (upon completion of-projectl? ' h If.~b~)~l~r~ial: Nu'~Ee,: and-ryDs' Of housing'units:'- ' .... One Faifiil¥ ' Tfvo Family Multiple Family ~, Condominium I Initially Ultimately /' i. Dimensions .in feet) o~ largest proposed structure _~ height; /~ width: /~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft. 3 2 tlow mucb natural material (i.e_ rock ~arthl etc I will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~Yes (]No E~N/A a If yes for what intended ourr;ose ~s the site being reclaimed?.~Z/,- - b. Will toosoil be-stockpited for reclamation? E]Yes E~o c. Will-unper ~ubsoil be stockniled for reclamation? []Y~s How. many aotes ot veeetauon Itrees. shrubs, ground covers] will be removed from site?. ~ acres 5 Will any.matur~e/orest (over 100 years old/or other locally-important vegetation be removed bv this prolect? [~Yes t~o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased i a. Total number of phases anticioated g. ^nUciuated date ot commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I ftmctionallv dependent on subsequent phases? 8 Will blasting occur during construction? E3Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: 'during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated bv this project 11 Wi1 projec: recm~re relocation of any projects or facilities? tons/cubic yards (number). &~,tk P month __ year. (including demolition). .. month year. []Yes E3No after project ~s complete ~ []Yes '~No If Yes. explain 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? U]Yes /~No ~ a, If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, ~tc.) and amoun! b. Nafne bf Water bod~ into which effluent Will be discharged _ 13. Is-subsurface liq aid-waste disposal involved? ~ ~Yes - ~No 14. Will surfa~b area of 'an existing ~ater bodv increase or d~cr~a.se by_proposal? ~Y~ ~NO 15. Is project or any port~on of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~es UNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes ~No a If yes, what is the amount per month tons b If yes. will a~ exis-ting solid waste facility be used? ~Yes ~No c. If yes, give name ; location d Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disDosa] system or into a sanitaw landfill? ~Yes e. If Yes, explai~ ~ [~No Will the involve the disposal of solid waste? E3Yes )~No prolect a If ves what is the anticit~ated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes what is the anticieated site Ii(e? years. 18 Will prolect use herbicides or pesticides? C]Yes o 19 WiJl. p~oject routinely produce,odors (more than one hour per day)? E}Yes 20. Wi'Il orojeet produce operating nmse exc~eedin8 the local ambient noise levels? E3Yes 21 Wi: project result m an increase in energy use? E]Yes ,d~No If yes . indicate type(s) __ 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate purdping capacity '~!~' gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipat~.d water Usage per day ~tt~ gallons/day. 24 Does ormect involve Local State or Federal funding? []Yes /~No If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: .... ~'~ Submittal ~ -~ ~'~'" '~Type Date Cit~'. Towu. Villas:. Rc, ard City. ]~own. Vdlage Iqamfing Board City. Town. ~!,0n¥', Board :,~,'.: City, Co~mb,:,J t,o'?th D, e3)~3¢-t,,me Other Local Agencies . Other Regional Agt}nci~s' State Agencies Federal Agencies C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decis~ont E/Yes . ~No. if Yes indicate decision required: L/zoning amendment E~]zoning variance [~]special use permit ~subdivision E~sit~ plan ~lnew revision of master plan [~]resource maria gement plan t~Jother 2 What t~ tile zoning classification(s)of the site? ~.~ 3 What is the/m_aximum potential develoument of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 What s the proposed zoning of the site? 5 What is the.tg2axmrum potent adeve opment of the. s I;e f developed-as perm t-ted b~ the proposed ,zon 6 Is the proposed OC~t~on co~sis~t~'nt wi~t~..-~h~:r~:omr~epd~d~:u~es in.~,dopt,ffd,loca~ I.and~g~e, plpnst, . ,,~¥e~ ~No 7. Wha_t.are ~he predominant Jand usa[s) and zoning classifications within a_% mil.e radius.of proposed act On? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~,4 mile? 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? - ~)~'~ a. Whal is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action ,reouire any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes E]No I3Yes /~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for anv community provided services (recreation ~educat on police, fire prot~o-fi)? ' ~¥es- a. If yes; is ex sting capac~tv sufficient to la d e projected demand/ ~]Yes ~No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E/Yes a. If yes. is tile existing road network adequate to haudle the additioual traffic? E/Yes [~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to ~larify your ptoje/:t.-If there are or m~ay be any adverse impacts associated-with your:prqposal, please discuss such impa~ts and the measures which you p~opose tR m}}igate or avoid them. E. -:V~ification ' "~ I certify that the information pro~ided~aboveis trueto the best of,my-~nowledge. : . , ~: -~ ~ , . App cant/SpAnsor N~me ~ ~'~;~'~,~;~ Date //~/e~ with this assessment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Res[~(msibilit~. of lead Agency Gencra:~ Information IRc, ad Carefully) · ht~;(}~-i~)~J~ltir~ ih{, f(f~iff-:the rtlv~e~v~f ~hoLdd b~' ~" ( '( by t e auest on' Have ~y respon¢ '~ and detem~mations been ~ ~nbbt~!'~be' re~;~e~er'is ~ot ex~ected [o he an ~;x[~,r[ envirbnh~ntbl analyst. ' '' · J~]e~fif~n~ d~at hh ~'r~[fact ~dl be no~entialiv large [~ olumn 2) does not mean tbat ~t ~s also necessar,lv significant. Any large impact must be evaluated .' P,~R [ 3 ~o determine significance, dentffymg an tmpact m -c. urun. Z simp]y a~ks thut ~t be Iboked at furthe~ · The Examples movided are to assist the reviewe~ by showing types of impacts and wherever pos,ihle the threshold of ma~nitucle that would tn88er a response in column 2. The examples a~e generally apphcable throughout the State and for mos~ situations But. for any specific pre ect or site other examples and or lower thresholds may be appropriate [or a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The imnacls of eacb pro[pet on each site. in each locality wi vary Therefore. the examples are ilksstrative and have been of[ered as guidance. The'. do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and threshokJs to answer each auest~on. · The ~umber of examples per anestion does not indicate the importance of each question '* n identifwn8 imnacts, consider long term· short term and-cumlaHve ef-fecU. Inslrndions lRead carefuliw a Answer each DJ the 19 questious in PART 2 Answer Yes ii there will be an? ~mpact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. If answerinR Yes to a question then check the appropriate box [cotumu 1 or 2) to~J~te the potential size of the c impact If impact thresbold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will o~u~ but tbreshold ~s lower than example· check colunm 1 d If rewewer i~as doubt about size of the imuact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART ~ e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated ~y change(s} in-the project to ~ small tO moderate impact, a~so cffeck the Yes box m column 3. A No response indicates that such a ~eductio~ isnot possible This .1 , 2 r 3 ~mallto Potenti'~l Cer~ impaci Be Mod~rat-e Large Mitigated~B~ Impact Impact Project Change ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ Wes ~ ~ Wes ~No ~ -. ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ' D" ~ ,OYes ,~No IMPACT ON LAND Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% o Constructi.o~ on land ~vhere the depth to the water fLa. bJ~ is ess than 3 feet · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Constructmn on bnd wh(~re bedrock m exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will contmne for more than I vear or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining ~urposes that would remoYe more than 1.000 tons of natural material fi.e. rock or soil) per year ~ Construction ~ exoan~ion of a sani.tar~ landfilE *~ Construction r~ a designated floodway. "Othe[ impacts 2 Will there be an effect to an~ umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc./ONO ~YES · Specific land forms 6 must be exetained in Part 3. IMPACT 0 Will ~roposed achon affect any water bod~ des~g ~ated as protected. (Under Articles 15 24. 25 of the Envrronmenta[ Conservation'taw. ECLI Developable ~e~ of ~i~e contains ~ Dro~ec~ed wgter body. D~edging df~re:'J~afi ff~0 ~dbic va~'ds af material from channel Of a prote~ted stream. [xtension of utiti Lv distribution ~aci'Jiti~s~throu~h a protected water body Construction m a designated freshwater or tidal wetland 4 Will proposed action affect any nomDr.otected existing~'or p~ew-body of water? E]NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% ncrease or decrease in (he surface area of an~/body of water or mole than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Cotrstruction Of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Oth6r rmpacts: ,WLl.I,Proposed Action,.af.[ect,~u[[ace.o-r-geoundwate[~:.~ -. Examples that would apply t~ column 2 · -Rr~p~d,-Ac~Jon wilLr~qui~a;~dJscha~8e perm t. -n"°~q~'d Afgo~ reqqlfe~.,~._ vse. 9~ ~' sgurcb_ of water that does not ~e ~ ) jrog'~ 'to s~rve p:Fo~ose~' pFo b~t) action. R~op'o~bd' Action requi}e~ ~ated ~uppl~ ~roM wells with greater than 45 Ballons per minute pumping ~padtv, Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposea Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveve~ off the site to facilities which presently do not exis~ or have inadequa~ capacity. Proposed' Action wou'[d use water in e.~e. so[ 20,000 ggHons per day Proposed Action will likel', cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural condition~. Proposed Action will reauire the storage of petroleum or chemical products 8rearer than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without,water and/or sewer serv cas ~roposed' Ac~ion~ Iocates;commercial.ahd rot industrial uses which may [equi,re new 9~ ~xDa ~s ~ of ~x sting_waste treatment and/or storage facili.ties. -- ~ Other mH)acts:~ ,6 wiJJ proposed action alter drainage flow or, patterns, or surface ;'eater runoff? C]NO E3YES Examples that would a~rplv to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 · Propose~'] A(~lictu may cause substantial e¥osion · Pr~'9oser A'cUon is ~n~om[mtible with existing drainage patterns · Pronosed Action will allow development n a designated floodWay · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will ~)rooosed action affect air nualitv? E}NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ~ Proposed ~ctlon wi].l induce 1.000 or nlore vehicle trips in ~ny given hour. · Proposed Action will result in"the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hem · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. pe~: hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BIU's per hour · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use · Prol)osed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial d~eIopm~?t.wKhin egisting industrial areas. · Other m~nacts: --I MPAC'I; ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8' Wi~ll Proposed :Action affect any threatened or endangered snecies;~ [_~NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or he,bicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural i~urposes. · Other mmacts 9 Wil Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-eno a agered species? E3NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Achon would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish ~hellfish or wildlife species. _ · Proposec Action reouires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest- (over 100 years of a~e) or othe~ locall? importa,nt vegetation IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES - - 10 WJ the P~'pposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E3NO ' E]YES Examples that w6uid apply to column 2 · ?he nrc'~osed action would sever, cross or limi.t access to agricultural land {includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vinex ard. orchard, etc.) I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ~] [] []Yes E~No [~] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ U ~Yes ' ~No ~ ~ ~Yes' ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ' ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No U ~ ~Yes ~No I 2 3 ~ Sitia'l to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~ E]¥es E]No ' [] 'O I--lyes UNo O' [] ' '~Yes ~No ' ~ . - ', ~--- · , :~Yes '~No: U ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~-"' C~'n'str0~tron' a:cti'?iW~W'0uld_ ~'~a~'gf~'O-r :comaact the soil profile of · :,The prop,os4d actiorii would~irrever~iblv convert more than 10 acres ct agricultural and::or, if located in an Agricututal Distrct more than 2.5 acres ~)f agricultu'ral land · The proposed ai:tion would disrupt or prevent installatim~ of agricultural land managem~ent systems te.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures {e.g. cause a farm field to drain p~orly due to increased runoff · Other impacts: IMPACT 0 N AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? UNO OYES (II necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21 Appendix B.) Examples that would appty to column 2 · ProPosed land uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether ma-n-made or:nMuraL . .~. ,~ · Proposed land:~ uses, or p{oject comp6nents visible to users of a_e~"thetic, reiiSui;ces wh' ch w~ e m hate or sgn f cant y reduce their en oyment of t~e aesthetic ~'ualities of ti-at resource. Pro oct compor~ents that wilJ result n the e m nat on or significant screemng of sc;~nic views knbwn to be important to the area? ':' · Other impacts ~ , : IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic pre- historic or pa, leontologica! importance? ONO OYES Examples that would applylto column 2 · Proposed Actio'n occurring w, hollv or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic plac&s · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located with n the project site. · Proposed Actioh wi[] occur.in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological ~ites on the ~YS Site nventory. · Other impacts: IMPAC,~T ON OPENISPACE AND RF?I~R~AtlON ~13 Will Proposec] Action affe~:t the quanti{y or quality of existing or future open s~oaces or recreational opportunit, es?. ....... ',~ ,z, [×amples that would appl~ to column 2 UNO OYES · The oermanent ~oreclosure c~.f a future recreat onal opportunity. · A major reduction of an opbn space ~mportant to tbe community. · Ot~ier impaq:ts . 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION :l~ Wi'~:l:her~ be ah.effect to existing transportation svstems.~ :';~L': Ex'~r~ples'{fiat wo~lot"apply to column ~ -¥"~i(~a~J~'~( p~s~('Da~terns of movement of oeoDJe and/or goods. P~oposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other re]pacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will r)roposect achon affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? E]NO J~YES Examples that would applv to column 2 · Proposed Acl on will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form ot energy in the municlgaJit¥ · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system t~o serve more titan 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Prouosed Action affect public health and safety? J~NO E]YES Examples that wouhl apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardo,Js substances li.e. oil pesticides, chemical~, radiation, etc.) io the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardo0s wastes" in anv form (i.e toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious etc.1 ' ~, .'; · Storage facilities for one naillion or more gallons of hquified natu'ra{-. - gas or other flammable [iauids. ' ..... ~ · Proposed action may result in the excavation of; other disturbanc~e within 2.000 feet of a site used for the d~sposal of solid or hazardous · Other impacts 10 NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E3NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1 500 _feet of a hospital s£~ool or other sensitive facility · Odors will ocr:ur ~outineK (m6re than'0ne'h~u;' per day). · Prooosed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Ca~ Impact Be Moderate Large. Mitigated By · Impact !mp~t Pr0~Jec.? Change [] [] [~]Yes ' ~]No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ BYes. gNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT :O~N GROW~H'iA~D CHARACTER = ~r ~ ~ ~ O~ cOM~,~NI:'J'¥ ~'~iG:H BORHOOD 8. ~Vdl propose~ action ~ff~t ~h~h~ffr of ~e existing communrty~ , :,Examples ~hat would apply to d~umn 2 ,. '~he permahen~ popb[afion ~f the city. town or village m w'hi~h the project is.located is I~Eelv [o grow bv more than The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating serwces will increase bv more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goats. Proposed action will cause a change m the density of land use, Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures Development will create a demand for additional community serwces (e.g. schools, pdHce and fire~ etc.) Proposed Action will set an important precedenl for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate emp~o3 merit Other impacts: ,Sma f to. .~Potential ,Can:lrnp~ct Be j Moderate Large Mitigated By mpaet , :::Impact Projec{Cfiange [] , ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy reJate'd to potential adverse environmental i.mpacts~. _]~]~Q _[~..Y.ES~ , Jf,AnyActmn in'Part 2 IS'ld~ritif[~d':as a Potenhal ~at~e ImPact or ~ ~ If You Cannol Determine the Magnitude of .Impact, Proceed to Parl 3 ~ Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more ~mpact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact{s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each JmpacL identified in Column 2 of Part 2: Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s]. 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of im Dortance consider: · The ;robabilit', of the impact occurring · The duration bf the m~act · Its irreversibilitv, including permanently [ost,rPs0u?ce~ of' value · Whethe~ the impac~ can or ~vill be controlled · Its Dotentia divergence from oca[ needs and goals · Whethe~ known obje~:t ons ~ the project relate, to this ~mpa£t ..... ·. , ~ ~. (Continue on attachments) : 11 Joseph Ivarone Adjacent property owners West Geraldine M. Yee 387 Wood Lane Peconic NY 11958 East Edward Nordstrom RR-1, Laurel Hollow Road Wading River, NY 11972 I~VARONE SYOSSET, N.Y. 11791 Mr. Peier Wt~zel: home at 405 Wood lane hPe~m~ itwas because we the ho.s~ to ils odgina11906 c:endilie~ STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. NY 12231-0001 TOWN OF SOUTHOL ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL SECRETARY OF STATE January 18. 1995 Albert J. Krupski Trustee, Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Re: F-94-698 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/NY Application #94-12050-L2 Jurce & Joseph V. Iavarone. Jr. Town of Southold, Suffolk County Dear Mr. Krupski: The Deparunent of State has reviewed the material that-you fonvarded regarding the proposed project referred to above. The Department has no '-objectiOn fo the Town of Sonthold assuming Lead Agency responsibility for this project. The Department of State is conducting a review of the owner's application to the Army Corps of Engineers for consistency with the pohcies of the State's Coastal Management Program. The proposed activity would appear to be consistent with the Coastal Program provided that any potential wetlands impacts are minimized. The proposed structure would appear to be comparable to the other existing structures in the project vicinity and should not exceed a size necessary to reasonably exercise the owners' right of riparian access to Richmond Creek. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the material concer~g this proposed project. If you have any questions or need additional i~formation,~pl~r~as~ /9/d~ me at (518) 474-6000. Sincerely, / l Coastal Resources-Specialist D/~vfsion of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization Enclosures VAB~\ Alexander F. Treadwell STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. NY 12231-0001 January 5, 1995 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, June & Joseph V. Iavarone, Jr. 15 Cherry Lane Syosser, NY 11791 F-94-698 U.S. Army Corps of EngLueers/New York District Permit Application #94-12050-L2 June & Joseph V. Iavarone, Jr. Town of Southold, SuffoLk County Acknowledgement of Federal Consistency Assessment Form Dear Mr. & Mrs. Iavarone: The Department of State received your Federal Cons/stency Assessment Form and supporting information on December 27, t994 and has determined that the submitted documentation is adequate to commence our remew of your proposed projecu We w/il contact you if additional irfformation may be necessary for consistency review purposes. You and the Corps of E~neers will be notified of our decision when we have completed our rev/ew of this project for i~s consistency with the New York State Coastal Management Program The Corps of Eng/neers cannot issue a permit for th/s ~projecr tmtess the Department of State conc,ars with your cons~tency cer~_ufic~tion. Please call Vance Bart at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, William F. Barton Chie~ Consistency Review and Analysis Bureau Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitntizafion V~rFB/jtb cc: COE/New York District - Sophie Ettinger NYS DEC/Region 1 - Robert Greene .% f 1 0 ' ~ S~-.ringers' 6 "x6" Piling I0" butt Pene bra t i Nih 10 ' Berths lO'oc SECTION Scale i~ feet Proposed Bulkhead, Ramp and Float in Richmond Creek at l~econic Suffolk CourtLy Application by Joseph Iavarone Catwalk Scale as shown 12/5/9d Page 2 of 2 EBB FLOOD Z RICHMOND CREEK 10' 3' o~r~Mooring }~ o dolphin 10'x20' j- Ramp 2~'x12~ O 41o F-Catwalk /NOAA VIC , MAP / / , ~SScale in yards -50' [ %}etlands New ~ ] [Existing Bulkhead SC Tax Map No. 1000 86-6-4 ~ _ Geraldine Yee j --1; 2 Edward Nords~roitl House PLAN Proposed Bulkhead, Catwalk [ Ramp and Float in Richmond Creek at Peconic Suffolk County Appliciation by 3oseph Iavarone Scale 1' Indian Neck Lane 12/5/94 20' Page l off 2