The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-4388Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 4388 DATE: ISSUED TO Authoriza io. Pursuan~r fo the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of fha Laws of the State of New Yodc 1952; and the Sou~hold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS:" and in accordance wFrh the Resolution of The Board adopted a+ a meeting held on ..~ 19 c~4. , and in consideration of the sum of $ 150 paid by of ..~?z~por~ .............................N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Condi{'ions lis+ed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trus~'ees authorizes and permits {'he following: Construction of a 20.5' X 16~ single story addition, 54' from upland edge of tidal wetlands, landward of an existing shed (aporoximately 10' X 10')~ an~ ~,rbw~of haybales be plhced duri.n.g construction. ~ -_" all ,n accordance With the detailed specifications es presented in the oricjinafing application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this daf, e. Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albettson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (51'6) 765-1823 November 18, 1994 Mr. Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: ROBERT HOLLEY SCTM ~53-3-13 Dear Mr. Wiggin, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on November 17, i994 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Land Use Company on behalf of ROBERT ALCUS applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 4, 1994, and WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town TrusTees with respect to said application on November 17, 1994 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREASr the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approves the application of ROBERT HOLLEY to construct a 20.5' X 16' single story addition, 54' from the upland edge of tidal wetlands, landward of an existing dwelling, and relocate an existing shed (approximately 10' X 10'), a~d haybMes be ~d~d duri~g'~onstruc~on. Located 1085 Bayshor~ R6~d._~feenport. Permit to construct project will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. FEES: None Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh cc. CAC Telephone {516) 765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUS'CIL Town Hall. 53095 Main l{oad P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Southold Town Board of Trustees FROM: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council DATED: November 15, 199~1 RE: Applications Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council was 15, 1994 at the Southold Town Hall. Present was CAC Chairman Bruce Loucka and CAC members Stephen Angell, Rqbert Kelth, Jack Hagerty, Patricia Isaksen, Betty Wells, and Allan connell. RECOMMENDATION OF WETLAND APPLICATIONS No.. 1207 Connell~ seconded by Jack Hagerty, it was recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees the Wetland Application of ROBERT AND BARBARA a 20.5' x 16' single story addition 5~t' from wetlands landward of an existing dwelling and shed (approximately 10' x 10') as shown on submitted South.old AYes. All No. RE.~ 1208 depth of 10' ~below ALW. Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees :ONCERNS of the Wetland Application of AQUAFOOD ERSHIP 38-7-7.1 to replace (within 18") 1047 +/- ber bulkhead. Maintenance dredge 228 +/-~ (maximum) basin and 50 +/-~ x 170 +/-' channel to a maximum Approximately 3800 c.y. of resultant spoil to be Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel. Vice Presidenl William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only ~woastal Erosion Pezlnit Application etland Per, nit Application Grandfather Permit Application Trustee Lands Permit Application Waiver ,~/cRe~ived Applicati~n:/°/¥/~ lerical Review:~/~/~/'~ o-~Completed ApplicatiOn ~/~ Incomplete --SEQPJk Classification: ce I Type. II--Unlisted oordination:{dae--~nt) -- ACReferral Sent:/"/~/~- ate of Inspec~ion:}°/~z~ Receipt of CACRepor~:(d~ate) Lead Agency Determination: ~-'Technical Review:(da~e)~/I;/~¥ Public Hearin~:~date) ' Decision: Approved (Y/N) (date) . Application Fee:$/~--~. ~ ~ tOWN SOUTHOLD, Name of Applicant ROBERT E. , AND BARBARA C. HOLLEY Address 300 EAST 40TH STREET/APT. 25-R, NEW YORK, NY 10016 Phone NuJnber:(212) 986-9653 OR 516/477-2861 Suffolk County Tax Map NuJnber: 1000 -053-3-13 Property Location: BAY SHORE ROAD~ SOUTHOLD, NY - SEE ATTACHED SURVEY LO/ # 14 AND 15 - PECONIC BAY 5SlA$ES (provide LILCO Pole ~, distance to cross streets, and location) Agent: PECONIC ASSOCIATES, [NC. - MERLON E. WIGGIN, PRESlDENI (If applicable) Address: ONE BOOTLEG ALLEY - P. 0. BOX 672 GREENPORT, NY ~]944 Phone: 5~6/477-0030 Land Area (in square feet): Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: .... hard of Trustees Applica~''~ GENERAL DATA 0_537 ACRES R-40 RESIDENTIAL SAME Prior permits/approvals for site Agency S011THOIn TOWN RIITInTNG DEPARTMENT improvements: Date JUNE 13, 1973 No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval governmental agency? ever been revoked or suspended by a X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (uSe attachments if necessary): CONSTRUCT A 20.5' X 16' SINGLE STORY ADDITION 54 FEET FROM THE UPLAND EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS LANDWARD OF AN EXISTING DWELLING AND RELOCATE AN EXISTING SHED (APPROXIMATELY 10' X 10'). (SEE ATTACHED PLAN.) ~ ....)ard of Trustees Appllc~.~ CounTy of Suffolk State of New York MERLON E. WIGGIN BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORk'n IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTROLD TOWN BOArD OF TRUSTEES. THEAPPLICANTAGREES TO HOLD THE TOWNOF SOUTHOLDA~DTHE TOWN TRUSTEES HA~MLESSANDFPaEE FROM ANyANDALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UArDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING I HEREBY ALVfHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, IVES(S), TO EN~'~RONTO MY PROPERT~ WITHREVI~WOFTHIS APPLICATION. //~~~~ Signature ~ swoRM TO B~.FO~ ~ TH~S ~ ~AY OF ~~ ,~,~ September 26, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in our behalf in making applications to the various regulatory agencies and securing necessary permits for the property located at 1085 BAYSHORE ROAD, GREENPORT, NEW YORK: OWNER - ROBERT E. AND BARBARA C. HOLLEY - Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-053-3-13. AUTHORIZED BY: ROBERT E. OR BARBARA C. TITLE: DATE: ..... ~3ard of Trustees Applica~ COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? Manner in which material will be removed activity? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the pro3ect as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) .... ~ard of Trustees Almplical~./ WETZJ~ND/T~USTEE I~ANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: CONSTRUCT A 20.5' X 16' SINGLE STORY ADDITION 54 FEET FROM THE UPLAND EDGE OF IIDAL WE/LANDS OF AN EXISTING DWELLING AND RELOCATE AN EXIST}NG SHED (APPROXIMATELY 10' X 10'). (SEE ATTACHED PLAN.) Area of wetlands on lot: square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distsdlce between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 35 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 54 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes 0NhY FOR F001INGS AND FOUNDATION - VICINITY OF THE WETLANDS. If yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? N/A ~ NOT IN'THE cubic yards cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Mariner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A N/A N/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason os such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): PROPOSED WORK WOULD~ IN THE APPLICANT'S OPINION, HAVE NO MEASUREABLE EFFECT ON THE WETLANDS OR TIDAL WATERS OF THE TOWN. 14-16;2 (2/87}-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a prolect or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full £AF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance asto whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impa~t. The form also identifies whether am impact can be mitigated or reduced, Parl 3: Ifan~ ~mpact in Part2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded 0n this EAF (Parts1 and 2 and 3 if appropriateD, and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ~' [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could bare a significant effect on tl~e environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Holl¢y Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Respo, nsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared byProject Sponsor NOTICE_: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed ma,, have a s,gnificant effect on the environment. Please complete the ehtire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may he subiect to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. it is expected that completion of the full GAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If infbrmation requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Robert and Barbara Holley LOCATION OF ACTION (include Street Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPUOANT/SDONSOR Peconic Associa't'o.qr Inc~_ ADDRESS P, O. Box 672 CiTY/PO Greenport NAME OF OWNER (if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( g~ ~ t STATE [ ZIP CODE NY 1'1944 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS CITY/po DESCRIPTION OF ACTION See attached STATE I ZIP CODE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-IUrban i-]Industrial [~Forest []Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.52 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 oi ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) . Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces · ........ Other [Indicate type)_ landscaped areas DCommercial []Other ~lResidential (suburban) E:]Rural [non-farm] PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0.0 8 acres 0. ~ R acres acres acres . ~cres acres 0 ~ 0.9 acres O. 0 9 acres acres acres acres acres 0,06 acres 0. O? acres 0.29 0.28 acres acres 3 What is predominant soil type(s] on project site? Riverhead Sandy Loam a. SoiJ drainage: ~'WeJ[ drained ~ % of site []Moderately well drained % of site ~Poor[y drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect site? (~Yes JJNo ..... -. ~.. ,~ ,,~ ~,,~,,~,-~.~ (in feet) Project Description Applicant proposes to construct a 20.5 ' + x 16' + addition on the landward side of an existing dwelling and relocate an existing shed situate 37~ + feet from tidal wetlands to an upland area 80' + feet from tidal wetlands as shown on the survey submitted with this application. The existing dwelling is located 35' + from the edge of tidal wetlands at its nearest point. The proposed addition wilI be 53' + from the edge of tidal wetlands at its nearest point. 2.' How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc,) will be removed from the site? 0 tonskubic yards 3. Wilt disturbed areas be reclaimed? * [Z]Yes lNg mN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [UYes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E3Yes 4. How many acres of vegetation {trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.0'1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest {over 100 years old} or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [Z]Yes IIINo months. (including demolition). 94 95 [~No year, (including demolition). year. ; after project is complete O OYes 1No If yes, explain 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction '~ 7. If multi-phased: a Total number of phases anticipated i (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ll month c. Approximate completion date of final phase 1 . month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? N/~3Yes §. Will blasting occur during construction? ~]Yes I~No 9. Number of jobs generated: duringconstruction 8 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will pro,eot require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes raNg a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes rang Type 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain [Yes J~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? lyes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? E]Yes lNg a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will an existiflg solid waste facility be used? E3Yes E~No c if yes, give. name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain E3Yes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. if ,,,es, what is the anticipated site life? 18_ Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [:]Yes [3Yes rang tons/month. years. ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more ti)an one'hour per day)? []Yes WNo 20. Will proiec! produce operating noise e~ceeding the local ambient noise levels? [Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~'Yes E3No If yes. indicate type(s) oil/electric 17% of 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A ga.llons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? ~Yes use ~No 5. Approximate percentage of prooosed project sitewith slopes: '0-10% ~-~85 . ~ % ~10-15% 15 % [:]15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? DYes 1No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? DYes tNo 8. What is the d~pth of the water table? 7 [in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? lyes [3No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [:]Yes tNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~Yes INo According to Peconic Associates, Inc. Identify eacl~ species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes INo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~lYes INo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [:]Yes ~[No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, weJland areas within or conti3uous to proiect area: a. Name []l'l-~rn~r~ C'~-¢,~'~ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? lyes a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? I~Yes [:]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connec~tion? ~Yes [3No 18. Is the site located ir an agricultural district certifie~T pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [:]Yes INo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 lyes [3No · 20 Has the site ever been u~ed for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? E~Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project {fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0 o 52 acres b Project acreage to be developed: 0.07 acre,s.initially; 0. (~7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.45 acres. d Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate per~:ent of 6xpansion proposed 17 %; f Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 ; proposed 2 - · ~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 0.5 (upon completion of project)? h If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 Ultimately 1 '. ~ Dimensions [in feet) of largest proposed structure 16 height: 16 width. 20.5 length. t Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 80 ft 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City. Town, Village Board OYes INo City, Town, Village Planning Board F~Yes reno City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes INo City. County Health Department r~Yes ~lNo Other Local Agencies F-.)~es I~No Other Regional Agencies E]Yes I~No State Agencies 0-1Yes reno Federal Agencies E]Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [3Yes ~No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~zoning amendment F'lzoning variance Cispecial use permit E~subdivision [~site plan ~new/revision of master plan Flresource management plan [~other 2 What is the zoning classification(s}of the site? R-40 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? .l 'lot 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 'Yes 7 What are the predominant land use{s] and zoning classific;/tions within a % mile radius of proposed action? residential F1No 8 Is the proposed action co~npatible witl~ adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? I~Yes E3No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the mimmum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization[s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes ~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services [recreation. education, police, fi~e protectio'~)? OYes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? F1Yes E]No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? gYes ~lNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to'handle the additional traffic? E]Yes E]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be 'needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be an~ adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please fliscu~s such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/$po3~% NameMerl~ w~g'~n - P~n~nic Associates, -Inc. Date 9/27/94 S ~nature '~-~- Title Agent If lhe adion is in the Coastal Area, you are a sfafe agency, complete fhe Coasfal Assessmenf Form before proceeding Location Map Holley - Situate: Bay Shore I~oad, Town of Southold Hagstrom Map #28, Page 71 Suffolk CoUnty Tax Map 1000-53 Staking Plan Prepared for: Robert and Barbara Holley Date: September 27, 1994 Location where photo was shot Direction of photo shot % PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIROI~.tEI~2AL plJt, NNER$ & CON~L.rr~AII~S One Bootleg ,~lle. F - P.O. Box 672 Greeaporf:.. ~e~ ~ork 11944 Telephone (516)~77-0030 Fax (516)677-0198 October 1, 1994 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region I Headquarters SUNY - Building 40 Stony Brook, NY 11794 SUBJECT.' Rob. bert E. and Barbara C. Holley Application Gentlemen: Enclosed is Application for Permit to construct a 20.ff~ X 16' addition to the landward side, of the residence of Robert E. and Barbara C. Holley. Enclosed with the application is a survey of the property; site plan showing the proposed additon; long Environmental Assessment Form; Letter of Authorizatiom, and correspondance from Suffolk Environmental Consulting and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regarding sites restoration plan and Order of Consent; and Memorandum for the Record regarding Southold Town Building Department's decision regarding their Wetlands Permit. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. President Enclosures per Text cc: Robert E. and Barbara C. Holley PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. One Bootleg Alley - P.O. Box 672 C~reenport. llew ~ork 119~6 Te/ephone (516)~?~--0030 Fa~ (516)~77--0198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: ROBERT E. AND BARBARA C, HOLLEY FILE MERLOh~~ SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES PERMIT SEPTEMBER 30,1994 Reviewed Site Survey and proposed addition to the Holley residence with Gary Fish of Southold Town Building Department. After his review and discussion with him on same, he made a determination that neither a Wetlands Permit or a Variance was required by Southold Town. He did concur that a D,E.C. Permit would be necessary. JOINT APPLICATIL.,i FOR PERM N/A ROBERT E., AND BARBARA C. HOLLEY 300 EAST 40TH STREET ~212~ 986-9653 NEW YORK NY 10016 PECONIC ASSOCIATES. INC. - MERLON E. WIGGI_~ - PRESIDENI P. O. BOX 672 ~ ~516~ 477-0030 GREENPORT SUFFOLK [To~,o, cit~ SOUTHOLD NY 11944 { vmo,~ N/A 1085 BAYSHORE ROAD PC~t OFfiCE I STATE ~~"~'COUE GREENPORT I NY 11944 ~ .^~ o~ ST.[^M O" ~0~ Or W~. TRIBUTARY TO PIPES COVE CONSTRUCT A 20.5~ X 16' SINGLE STORY ADDITION 54 FEET FROM THE UPLAND EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS LANDWARD OF AN EXISTING DWELLING AND RELOCATE AN EXISTING SHED (APPROXIMATELY 10' X 101). (SEE ATTACHED PLAN.) /u 7 //97/ I? ? Robert and Barbara Holley Situate: Bay Shore Road, Town of Southold ~ote : all photos taken on September 26, 1994 ~ l : 30 pm) Photo showing the northwestern landward limit of tidal wetlands as delineated on in the fietd by Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. and indicated on the attached staking plan Photo showing the northwestern landward limit of tidal wetlands as delineated in the fieM by Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. and indicated on t~ attached staking plan as Q~) Robert and Barbara Holley Situate: Bay Shore Road, Town of Southold (Note: all photos taken on September 26, 1994 ~ 1.'30 pm) Photo showing the north/central landward limit qf tidal wetlands as delineatedon in the field by Suffolk EnVironmental Consulting, Inc. and indicated On the attached staking plan Photo showing the northeastern landward limit of tidal wetlands as delineated in the fieM by Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. and indicated on the attached stakingplan as Q Robert and Barbara Holley Situate: Bay Shore Road, Town of Southold /Note: all photos taken on September 26, 1994 ~ 1:30pm/ Photo: showing the location of the southwestern corner of the proposed addition as staked in the field and indicated oh the attached staking plan as (~