HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-75.-5-14.1 Verizon Wireless at Southold Town Animal Shelter . ._ _ -- ----- -- -
�.�-'''.
.
!T- 1/�PY�„P1 wlreless
/ . 4CENTEqOCKROA�
WE6TNY 0994
__-._ ...._....
wireless �-APr NNa
WEST NYACK, NEW YORK � TM_ �
WIRELESS G4MMUNIGATIONS FACILITY � '
•'PECONIC" � �
_
41450 MAIN ROAD
PEGONIC, NY 11958
DRAWING INDEX SITE'INFORMATION
T-i TITlEBHEET$INDE%
A-'I PLANS,ELEVATION AND DETAILS ���i�nON rra ' � °�
A-2 ANTENNAANDEQUIPR9ENTDETNL3 e�TMP�s�F�' ���;p,e�s�oo���g�flEM�E� � �J
ti� � �)�ttivMo�i�Ntv+
�(31NEWHYeaoCn9LE5AinMENnwS. �_� —�
AJ SCHEMATICBSPECIFICATIONS �o(i)oes�rvnoNene�reanrvo�Nerveeusa
t�i Mces iN E.nsnrrc3 e�uiFmEr�n snFi.rEF.
S�.rtHOi.6.NY�tB]v ' m�eklroa��,�u�,pae�rnw
��,.. - Poi_ANPW25&a9C6��NE[ii �
� � �� �� �a���,��� � ,�,x,o, Ea,,�.�A���
y� ��a+� aaoTrrc
A caur.ncr:
' .crwssE ��n�H+oTM:�°re�n�
�� ream�s
�� c�� 4�^'���nrum i.ATRU : . wo
ELEVAnON .BB W I _fi 20 5�i�..-)
� � �
�� � . ��-� � ..]
� J
��TE ���.��„ � � �
� �r � �'� �.E ,;���� ��
� �„ , .�a.
n
M /
�.�� ...�
,��
. M /�f p����M N�(J.
� tlT
°dn'{I �rrpM J: I �p �p
��� W
/ �y
�'
wciNrrv r�nP wr°
,�.,�.,.,� �n r�`��.
ss�„„„;�„�
_ -- _.—k --.. _
__ _-
i _ ,_ . ,__. . .. f �os.�a,� �,..:--�°
I.r , ( � �� � w�reiess
4 I V@r1
°
b
— NTER A
Y
.�.'_.____ J x �n�5 i . I / WEHT
�__�. ��� � r „� - —
� � �J � ( �" t '�`� j"� GPSUNITS
I � f-'_'_ � F/
� + ' J- I L� (`�f � " � .-.... " aceeF �S� �PT
a��. t
���
� _ z� i �a ,e
I � , � . . ,�
�
� � j _. . A ^ -e1 �, `"
� m m
� f
�e
� } I �Qa �, °
' i_ �� ,.� �II � xE � � � ��E��,.s
��a,�
�� c`��� � �arP �,� ��- �IX�.,,,e,��, � � ��� ' � � �
t qt ..` $ , ......... I a.,,�E.�EA - 1 r �I � �J
,� b
.'.... - �RMEM
, � �,� _ � �� � ( <�_�) �� >� � � K
r b �
� � .. `—" ..--x —r
a
. �
L� � ws.vez �
( Cl i-1 (� aFa�,� � T` �� _
������ ;
� ��:ae � �
�._J � 1-LI� ( � �J`- � �E«��. � s"u , , k� —
__ �a.v�eo��,RE.�s �a=o�..��� �� �,
LOCATIONMA,P ���� ������.���Mp� ....... I • � """""'-s`� PANEI.ANTENP7A5
osaaooxv.voAw.wu , °"�`8waaurare�..ex
s�^�E,"_�^^^ """" y � a ANTENNA�ETAILS
�<l�t` � �- , —.�� �,.�� . �":., ���.�
.
� /�r ,
� �' ���\COMPpUND PLAN `�"--'-f �.,,
F-- A�,�a���oA.�,� °
„v w�ro�a,
Fa w�� _ ,r �� .. w � e a x
�r.
� n �� ._.�q�� X � �x�'��I � ._�
mm.arar,w . ..� .. _ ___.. x � 1� � �
_ s�ro � ��� � (� �
�r,a„a=���w„� . - �� ��
� ���;� ����� � � � � �
�.,.,,��. �� - � � „ �i�!�
A.� � � ��� � �ld� �� I�;+� �
n,�a.����w� a� .- �Y i IX.�,�erF,� ��as, � L �.�,.
�,..e�Aa�,� -;
�E� . Nrr�� ��I � I�C IL .1 � � � i EW�a,�.�, �,,,��.�.
,�,Ma �o �
„ �;���°°A�TMEo�w�s
n��r� C ��) -° ��
�,�,E� �..aEoo�.,,�,«a.E aaa
.,w��,>,�a�,�;,�o a , _- -
� $
- b r ..
�.�E�.P.�,��� k & � % � ,� _ I�J � �
�r � .. , u;
a ��
l � i
rt �, - �
.
�a.��o��,a�,a�m ;�,, � ��� ,� °`� ,�1� }a�!- �r�,� �_ - rI IJ I�°�I ��,s�3
a� ,,�
sFJcaum�errtAomn.titewr.ava k 1S�r � a r / �w � .��� _ ......_ _........ .-. RLE99
acanuu.aooroatswrzcrvaxaim q, oA
w^�"^��°^��a���^TM�F"' m�,' �,'f�, � � �,'� 3 E UIPMENT SHEI.TER s ANTENNA CABL G DIAG M
�
� �a u r .......".... r.,.� I
� II I
"�� � <s a r �- - ..— oq ..
�a.,EN.�,�.,�, ___� '"", �
�.F���.,� ... � ��� d� a e I l �"` a��«a�EmP�,a�a� �«.,,ft�. ......N .....� �.�o., e I !
�a.PA o„�. - A� .
� aw �
w � E�a �,AK� .aw �o
�. , i, z - �.,. ��� EP,��.,�E�N� �.. � �"� � I�I
.�„ �, .� .E��
a.�.a��.�a .._... �" `�n' u ... �:. ��- ....... ._ ... .:-:: ..._ —...._ (*� ....... lt ._a�l
mer.auwea ,�'�Y" � INViLI1Nt(>AfA rp :.. _ ev .
ea�nv�xrsrv�TEA 'F. �� � ' .t
usr.*amrnmrver ' 'A � NN4 iroNS� u�o EOA�N F1^.A710 ......- _.... ........ wxiryµ�
I
'a`,'., ,a, .. E. .. ,�., �oa — OF N�It�
_ o„�,o Na sr.�xi �o+o,H --
n�,o
� — �, , P � ,zo- „�k, o , P a
_ _ m�s ry�vNe�m .(C M.p
�a,o.v ,uu�n
__"" N� _
' n �. -,aaecF , a P a� ��;a� ,�a� � � m w a� m�r.c�oa<. ,��. ,za ,^ 5, � O#6
����f .. �1. r`b'�c° xh»,o�a
.� �. . �re-o w.,�w+� + P p aeau� �re , o a ,,� �
....._ _.._... _ _— __"_.... _ _�A�F L
�_ _-- cos<Aeise..___— ......_. �
Ewvr.�r�.�exrvz�rw '�x��s� �s: � a n a< M _ ""'-
irec�. � v �.Ecmcs �
�EASTERNELEVATION a� ... ._....._ .. . ____ ......,� a.�,M, �,�a ....... _ � P......... --- �" E _ _ . . �.
A .:.ia v�ce:ew..irim� � p�� P� e�k' ea< �"m�''a .�oasa�M � P .Mf �. �,M1b'
t • • . � d sv� 'cm� r a e.wer eo is
oar
— E-G��.,�,� , P a�� �.re.a..ws�w„� � a �o ,e ' � N�'�
...�.,.�„�...,� __. ....._in�e --....... S p
...re���- o�� _.. s. �._.a� �re��.��a�� ...___ , — �A� � �,.. .
° ..�_.. �M,H.....i,is �, .......... ..____ ...�„
-- —
-- __ — --
. _— —
_.__ ._._ _...__.
��, a V43Y1 Ij�i�wireiess
Ew„�.,p�.,w.�,�r=EAMwM .� y_ ac�r aocxao 0
�.,�,e<ro�a..�e,��. r .._. w�ro�� _ ... °
\ `"�t`°
` ` �" ��. �-:���,00e��. �APT
'•., ...... � �w�� � ... �,�
.,.. --�s�A.,mu�m „� � u�
a�;.;W� � /,:`� .,, -� .� .���r _ �:�.�� } �,e��,�..,�
�Ex� . �� �
� , -
� or�w» �:,, �wnr�a y � Mmam..�aoPv� � �
@ �.... ! .ea.rmT.l
arer�rca-�r —� § �aheeinunre
�% " �... _{ ),o,a��� t 1
._ __ —, �A �a„�,���A ,
�� � �
� ,���
a�..,,�,�M,,,�,.,,,, .. _ � -�j /1GPS UNIT MOIJNT - :.:
--
��� � - -
= �ro� (s�ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAI� � ""`��"��°�
����r��,��a� � a
ummA.uwuse:noaroxos.aw_ _'�� a 1 A.i een�.X•��a^ ..
a•
��`
✓' �
F
�,� t� ANTENNAMOUN7INGPLAN � __ �.__, _�p� �,�
�, �,��E:v�d -
� 5 ........Ty gv, . .
ran
ao,x
� mn�Pn �« oF�ow��m�ox. r
ga.,,w..�mn ,„`�,a„ .v.� �AA���Es ^ T e RI �l..:..:}
� �, wa�
��eLLao"� � ��a.A�. �. � � o.��,� I 1� ���� � �
��A �� �.� >�r,P,ma �,a�o�� _- '"� a E � i ,
�, �
.�,� r � � �� ��sW��,��, u �
�, ��,E�xe�,o� �-^a -I I-
� AE���
�V��� � �" � �) w �r �f—��EW��E��� � '��m��,��� � —�'— �,,,n„6�P�e,� � � i
„�,
' .°�'��.���;o \ I _.. . �� ""w""`"�,���.b,g.m�, �a RRH E UIPMENT ::.. ..
�A��,mo.aAm � �A� \ s�,o� AEAs �.e�x-.,�x
��
� � ��p�_A-4
� _ ___ _
� �.�,ro � ro
Po� ��� � � � � ��
� �����w� �„oa� �
��WIf8IB9S
�m �
cfnezvmcwuo�s
wurc+.an.+uerwaww»neu�m�wrcv.mvw ocrmeooauvan�wnwreiw�nmv.w. mu�armmuaawwr..nam.w�nm�r.wmm
.wcwnxnm-+.r:..r.aenu�wcvmrmm umwcwxauuwrru�mmmuwwuuwm rwwa.wms�umoazmewnu�enunrc�nee `mm"wwwm�mmuwwommxumw�ue
aee�i.u.ce u�remuvwnrow.wsm�.vrovemenw.w+ esmnmmwmmwmmmmemamrwxcee+ wzwun�wwmiimmmnownn
4 CENTEA C POAO
"'^^�d^ ���e WESTNVA C984
.,�.,s,�wam�..,�. ��«�.. ,w.,,,�.w,a,a,,,,.. "�_____-___ ( -N...�...�ro o��mR� AY'r,.._.._—
..�.w,��. . «�a�,��:,��.,�.,�,�.�.x.,� �.,�,.�.��..�...o.,�..��„a
„�.<�,�.�-. «��,«�.��,.�.,.�.... a�.e�,�,a.:.�.,,.,,.,.�..� ,..,�.�„�..�.�.,�,.��.�.E _
�p..,���ff.��...�a,.., p,�..�
w.,�..�.a,...�...�,�� _ _ ���
a
��.,��...� � . .� �^o .�. ( (
���.o
� �. �. .. k°/\
�����.n�mA..,ro�
���
�::...:...�.,.a.,.�.�.,,..w,.n�,. ���I
�.��,a,.��..,.�„�o�,«,� r r
�,�,�.�«�.M�.���,�.�,. w�.�,�.o�,
...,.a,.. �. - �.
.�.�„�,�,...�w,m.,�,.,w»..,,� .:,�,«,.ro _ ,��
.�a..�a..,�„�.m.x.�w�» «.�.o�..�.��.
m����
,...nn,�,�.,.�,�....,,...w.� ...�.�,�� � a�v�«���
�,..,�.o»,�.�„w..�,,,�,�,,,� � ,�.�..m�...�,»�„� _
•d�a:���a.�»x�':'.a».ro .... .,[�.��4� L �^^� ,.L� „��� ...
�.�.�� �.a w � � ����s � ]
� �:o��� o,�.,�aA��,oM
�m��m��,�a�e� .�ff��.� � �� .. am �
u�d.����o��M���� �a�µo�.�E��.
..��,���_a���. o.�,..�o�_M _ _ o
��o� �0����6M��.� ��ro��p�
�.�.w,�.,.�..«„�.��a., . .�»�.,.,,�M.,..�. .�,�n.,«>.w.�,�,.v�.,,,,�. ,m" . m.
�.��., „�:.,�w..�....�rc �,«.�,...,�.���,�.�m� �,���R�� �,.�..�„..��m.a„�p .,��Re�a�$.�:�,' �wA���o�ww.y�
�w..�a�.,�.s,o-.��,,..� �h ..,. a.,.,�,e�.��.«�,.
... . . ,,, . �����
ro��m�A,a,�.��u,�».n „�.„„ "<`�" �a,�ri�,�
��.a.�.�„����.,�.. ��, �-M,w.... .
ar...,�.�,�.�.�.� ^�.^ ��A�.�.�., � g
,.,��k�,.�.,��..,�.�.a �.. „�..��.�,. ��,.����. ' �,�..,...�.�„n 3� �t
ou.n.wo�n�.«,�.��.�+xnu w. . . .��.au.e��.. g rwuasrnmaur�oa+�
a�pU...�.ne....o..�.. ��.wo �..�.� �.w.fl w.n. +�c � �c�a rtrvl�ou ' �/��
..o..+�.+�... M..�.+.x+�»+.w.�»Kr:.wa..e am.eeau.acwc�ao�s a
..m.��...w.�.v.m*��...�� ��• �'°�,"y.w�«••� ..re.�....n..u.m..ww..�rn=w�.�� ' ��a.assNvcr..�M„��...„o aaueivoAnwwaae+zav�oev�
.w.m�.�==auqw+�.�a«�.s�o a «fl.�c«.que-.�.���a.�..��� ..««�m��m.mmw .xi�..,..a.aMu,a.... cmrvema��anAAnv
.«�.a«�..�m.�.mwmF� '^"w �.:�.�...a��s.��..u...xm�: ..{.,.�.«. ....�"m".ao�s.R.o:.,mw�ew,m....� �ws.'�wcnreorvrerv �
.«.d w�am.m wm.i,i�.,.m�.0 mm...a:......:...��.a�,n.��° o
�."�a�'...�� ._
...w'" mWua.,m.n......�..p�.o<�a.w�o o � ..�,... �
M . . �,�..g......�.r..a��..F�.�c . ,. ,.-'. w.�....,�«,u�. �. c«c�nwAes u iEes ..
r�wa�o
°"`.'°"' � ar.�...>.�.�.�o �e�,.ro.waeew�w.».u��� wrcn u.+waw.mvr.a w�e. i. _ �.
� � • ��.��,� � .. I, �$�r � ��\���;�A����M I �
.� M���,.��.�.�� ���°��.�„�.m: �
.,����
. .��.� �wa-� ��.��.���,����
�m���
„ ��. ��w�. _ �. � �� r P� I �� o�,,,a„ �
ce �p��� �� � �� �,
^` w�wv.mm=a wwunnarer�eewu.wromo.owa wEw""`iew�.w.w."�o+..=,�,ay' I . .. p�, I
���m�� �����v��� M{�0.M���M � � rrsavwunoxorwewrow�sinre
O1M1 cnw.mrwuw.uswvwrsa �.„vmr»mmiwuwuee.e.t«rezcereum+n e�newm.rnwwwm.vw�u.w.r�u. .._... ......... .._.. Ei�weu�rowu�rnwewuws
uwmw.eww.a:anwu�.eecmunarnm .zen.o-.e .� . .... . - rsrrow
� -A���s-�=� ��w�� "`�""""""""` ��� �SECTOR WIRING SCHEMATIC
a...�.�.,� . . . .., �.���» w,.,�»..�,..�,M�«�- .. I ae s n -�1
���wm� � �� I ...I
�,�,� "" ��, — -]
�. .,��.� w...mm����,�n,�.�.. .�.��a.�sw�.....,�
�..�,��...,�,..,��..�.�� .� ,.,.a„vo , ��,aa�.,�..��,�n��, a�,��.�,�,m��„� � -..
......�a.k.�.�M.��. � � �,�.,�.,..�.ro��.,�.a .�„��..o�,.��.,.0 -
�».,�,.�„��w.. ,� m:�w. .�..��� .��.b.�.�,.. ��.� �,�
.�.»..�..,,�,��, �..a...��,. "�" I I�1
.q.am�..�,.�..�.oM..,. ,.,.,�..�w.,,.,...,�a,,,., .�,��.w.�,m.,�..��.�
.�„n.u..���.�w�.�:, Ma�,.9�..�a.a,�.
�..,.��,�.,��.�� .,�,.�,.a�..c�.�„�m��.�a�..���.��„�.�»� ��
�,.�..M...�.w�.�„�� �.�oe�°„a�_�.m��.� � a��°r��ro H,�
�� eW..�.�� ��..�w�..ro �� ��c ��� I
�.,� T�ioN
w�,..� �,�..,.�o..� m�,.,�.�.....�.�mM �
.�,,.M.,��,.m.w�.d . � ����� � � w��.
,�.,.�.����.o��se. . �..�.� �-�..�..b�.�.�.�..�.,�a o�,»�m�,�..a
,� , � ,�._ma�,�,.. �.,.�.,.�„��,,�.�.�.o � %�...e�..�
� �'°�.:.:�..��Mmwm,�o..m .av+�w..�.�wa�..mw.iw.aYo 4 �
s.rnce ..un�..«�..m o�.,vudav«ckwmaTVME.Rrrounw P* � rd�^'
w ' a,m,�.. �xriinn `w
� . .� � . _ s�u�v�ro��a�xa-Y
l srr�u��'�
� ��r � sou�rto�r
T'owata�sauT'�fotv
,a�,m�' Sa9.Tb` S`U , 'KCp'Lt , .EYJYO`R`JC
�'�OL a(?Y
� e�+ '• •2(
7 '�H� b°§2'10'£ .. "- . t
� x .iz�'mm+ N+ z.0 ,..� , . -.•.. ..eo+on2.27 ACRES
SCTtd@10E0-YS 5 10.1 '�
. AREAc5�0.3716aFT I
��, �.:r : xe.vs� �.
� ' �:� � ,� o �A�Q
� �m„m�,�`4 �.
I� � i:� � �� ,
I i` �' `�
�F �:� �� ��
1 , � ��
I �� � �
�� � �
�� I!.� ---;� __._. �+ �
� � �� ,� `--- - � .� i �
� , _ � _. a n
� ''�� �� ; � . �� `rnx�y I� �
�1� 't���_rr-�."`'� t11 i 'IiS5°a'6'A8'8 136.tl4' (�..a__ ..
� ��r '—?f � �.� ' �
;:.�la,;d � j °' ,�;�,�, �
�' � � � ' �" � - �- � � �,.
�„ L �� ,\l\ � �
t. .. x l.r---"'J~_�.:�i�t��?'''_�..���)�
„ 1.- ��fi.�" '- 1,,, ,.--.� E �I�I��:rr� �. '." t-.a;��
� ��..��J ! 3i4.84' � . r,l�s � :\ .� n� �
_ `��, §i8'#0`�0'iV: ,i . t%'�-�r_t •.%se< i� .
i ' , � � � ��z� �'s;sP�:�G ��" ,.
�..e ! $ 't. ,1 eF °'6 �t_w •S'� srs, I.� *�" �
/ � � � v.0 aw, d s� �• {�24 gf! g!'0!h �..
� E� � ��.�; ' � �1 -a.t fi _- I " �
� o i' ' �.i P 1 � i � ' � I
� . i�i�,_ l:.�, tl 4 '' � � ... . _e .. .� :_
y f� � y ste=�e�sb'w�
=.}a =,; l± i ei.as' �.
� oaa�w� �ii3:so-•
saS�d'
R�1W y%:z�i�`�Sdt:'y�:r'�`� �
MA� B �r {�
� �S.R.25) � t 7:a �1 .
I z���
� ������»^v:.e .� .:��':.;,yy�P';J
��� ����
I �smm� � '�"i�-� JOMh GA lACHER' !
tAt70$URY2YOR
� �m _ e� S9 FL4RE%GE DRkVE
MANORYILLE,N.Y.116a9
�<,�...s
ax� suaveveo:oeroa�eao,zoos (631�874•0400 �-
!
c�� ��� °�
����� ��"r�
Kalin, Carol �� � °°`�"��
From: Elizabeth Herington-Smith <elizabeth@cityscapegov.com>
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:09 PM
To: Lanza, Heather
Cc: Cummings, Brian A.; Kalin, Carol;Anthony Thomas Lepore; Kay Miles
Subject: FW:In-coming Mail:Verizon at Animal Shelter Consultant Fee Follow-up
Heather,
I am just being looped into this and wanted to follow-up.Please find below response to the specific questions raised in the letter from the Amato
Law Group dated August 10,2016. We have always provided our review services on a fixed project basis to all clients for the simple purpose that
all of our clients know what the fee is and there is never any additional or hidden charges.
To address the points in section Verizon Wireless'Prior Experience with Town's Consultant.
1. The fee of$4,000 is the agreed upon contractual fee with the Town for such reviews and represents the time,expense and effort associated
with a wireless infrastructure expert review. Cityscape does NOT utilize an hourly rate or an"escrow account"with variable charges as that
practice is prohibited in multiple jurisdictions(see,e.g.North Carolina and Georgia statutes)and is subject to abuse by other less-ethically inclined
consultants.
2. Fee includes all hours necessary amongst various personnel to review application,resolve deficiencies in submitted materials,consult with
applicant and municipality,perform engineering analysis using proprietary software to verify technical parameters asserted in application,review
applicable town regulations relating to siting of facility,and prepare opinion regarding the proposed facility. This includes engineers,administrative
staff and attorneys,each of whom spend time reviewing some portion of the application.
3. No travel expenses are included.
4. There will be no itemized invoice as that simply creates additional cost which neither the Town nor applicant is willing to pay for. Please
consider#2 above your itemized invoice.
5. There will be no amount refunded to Verizon as the fee is$4000.00,representing the time and effort as stated above.
Please let me know if you need anything additionally from us as we will be happy to help in the response to him.
� � �� �a � �� ��a i
Best regards, .�„
Elizabeth
�`�I�� �� ''�� �����W
�b���d��r�4r�"���U'���
F"k���dd�������
Elizabeth Herington-Smith �CITYSCAPE CONSUL"fANTS,INC.
i
, "� '� ��y .. ���..
�:�� m�� ��� ��
�..._��"� .,
p�� ���.T � �
Michaelis, Jessica
From: Kalin, Carol
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:11 PM
To: Cummings, Brian A.; Terry, Mark; Cremers,William; Lanza, Heather; Rafferty, Pierce;
Rafferty, Pierce; Rich, James; Sidor, Martin; Wilcenski, Donald
Cc: Michaelis,Jessica
Subject: In-coming Mail: Verizon at Animal Shelter Consultant Fee Follow-ua�
Attachments: Ltr to Town re Consultant Fee 8-10-16.pdf ��.� ������ ��,�� � ���,��F �r�
�' �.,M„��'�,�� L.�f
� ���.��� � �,�' r"��.����J
� ��a�pt9���N�������.r��u�
-----Original Message----- ����k�����Gi����:������JI
From: Benjamin Weisel [mailto:BWeisel@amatofirm.com] �
Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:26 PM
To: Kalin, Carol
Cc: Gabriella Amato
Subject: RE: Verizon at Animal Shelter Consultant Fee Follow-up
Hi Carol:
In connection with the above-referenced application, attached please find correspondence we are forwarding to Bill
Duffy tonight. We are merely seeking additional information regarding the Town Consultant's fee. Perhaps you can
assist in setting up a call or meeting, so that this matter can be resolved?
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Benjamin Weisel, Esq.
Amato Law Group PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 901
Garden City, NY 11530
Phone No.: (516) 227-6363
Fax No.: (516) 227-6367
Email: bweisel@amatofirm.com
Website: www.amatolaw�roup.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Amato Law Group PLLC.
This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it,you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
have received this transmission in error, please forward same to sender and destroy the original transmission and its
attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
i
�
�C�i7 s�I.,t� A°T
666� �� RY�.�
9'I°Fi�I,���
4U5 �`CC3IV A � �21�1°I'���W Y� �]53p 40� S�'.
� R�'S fi$ G,2b7'Fi �%s� I.� .51b 227m6363 �C7I 264
w�c����r.�;iai7a ( ) � �e�)oa
� ° 516 227-6367
x�g2�2�aas B � I.:(B32$317�1512
� •�Z�z�a��saot � ��3�y��7-��
�u�ust 1 Ue 20�6
��� ��I�I�� � ���1���.��5�
�r, �ill uffy �
T'a o�Sa��thesld T`r� .Att� �y
T`� �11 � �x
54375 ���rt� �5
5�uth�ld, Y 11971
�e �c�ildin� Pe it App[i���i�rr (th� �`Appl�c�ti�r�'`} by ��r l��rk S S� Li ited
Part��rs}�ip d/b!���riz�n ir�l�ss �46�/�ri:cc�n ir�less'"� �� th� a� r�f Sout a�ld
(th� �6�I°a "} rn ��n���tiesr� ith th� rn�ir�t�r��nc� and �p�rad� �f th� escistir��
ubli� utility �� rric�r►i��tic�r� f��rlit� (th� "�� uni��tic�r� F`��ili�y") lc�cated at
41450 airr �a 9 P��OCI�C9 �w Y�r � �ith Suffolk Cc�u�ty `F°�x �p
d�s��r��tic�za istrict 1000 I S�ct►or► 75 � [�� S d Lok 14m1
V�r���r� ,,;...�,rel�ss F��fn._P��c�ni�f� S r���x�•_��1�.��:�._1�H���21��__............__ .�....
�ar r. u�`�`ya
As y�� ��y r��all, this fi r�pr�s�nts V�ri��r� zre��ss ir� th� �b��emr�f�r�nc�d � e�°.
� �r d�s��ssin� this rrr�tt��° v✓z8h V�ri�c�n �r�l�ss, th�y � s��lcir�� additx�r��l infc� a.tro 3�
c�rd�r tc� dete in� if �itys��p� �c�xls�lt t's �t�� 06"I'o es �c�r�sul�anY') �4,OQ0 f�� is a
r��sc�z��bl� amc�unt to ��v�r th� cast �f tl��ir r��ti�w taf th� r�inc�r u ��ad� vv�r th�t Ver���r�
ar�l�ss �s pr�ap�sin� (i.�a, r�pl��in� th� r�fs�� ��istir�� t� as �ith r�ir►� r� 1��� ent te �s
d addi�� �ddition�l �q�ip��a�t �r� th� �xist�r�� �nte � rncaunts), h�r�f�re, �`�r th� r�asc�r�s
d�t�il�d belc�w, a�r� ar� itin� t� r�a�.c�st a ��i�ph� � cail car e�ti��� in �rder t� ��r��
addiciar��l �r�f� �ti�n ab�ut th� "�°��r� �ansult�nt's e�, sc� th�t the �bov��r�f�r�r���d
Appli�atior� � be prc�c�ss�d.
li�� l� ��r� Ca � �cti� �o
�°�ru°�����t ��r "�°a��i�� ��a�� �2��....°!'����������� �������, ��r�A��� a����r•�mQ���s ���� ��� `�`�
4�p�a�y V�i�� �air�;y �;a�rr����t��t(�� au��f�u° �:�.p���°���)� ���������°y a�r as��s� 6:�� °�'�r�tt� u�� ����e:������ �.��d
���1����.���� t�,� ����a��c�Qn�ya�o.." ��d 4Yu�t Q�� "I°��rz� �i�ll ��.y ,��r�� �"r��� �rra ���°�r��ro� �������F
�rot��s��s��� by �.a�� f"a�c° gh.� ��.�rE���r�b. �°���tlxi��°, �s;rn�a�� �nr�li�,�s �,� ��r�r� �r�"� ���-7���,����(��� a�f
��� �°�s�r� �c�d�, ��w��D� ���� �"��th a���a ,::�vv�����dr��,��a�s� .�`���a ���� ���;�°a�� ��:��r.a���: ���y �b� u����^
�`�°�����. ��r��a� �� td��-��. �� u���i���k°��II�� 41n� "�"�v�°r� �`�� n:��.� �;��� a�:�` �rt,� �a�����lb�����' p:��•�b��s�i��r�l ������
,,��r�ic�,� ��:�afi��tl� ���;�,�r��°�� ��� ��ra���t��.� �s`tl� tr�u� z°�;���� ��" ��Y �:I��➢n����cr�a,,'" �u��6 a�f � ���b-
��"������)��:,), �,�vS���k-i ����n�;�t�s ����� `b��� aQ�� ��p�.e�� �k��.�: ��� ���uz��� ���I� �.n� ��;��°��v �Zy ��z� '�"���r�� ���
a���� �l�.�a� t��� �.�a�m�a� �a� �.��� ����,��xl P�a�r�a��,�r��F �.� t�n�� �:�yra����Il�.��n a.a�'��� ��ma��p�;��, t��; ���ara��n�����
b������ �V��fl� k�� ��-c�z��t��r A°����arr'cd �� �➢..g� �����.���a'°o �...�c������,D �����°��y �� �l��s� "�'��u� ��a��
w�����ra.��s, tir����� �i��r� �t�r �a�.�a�c�i��a��s ���� �p�«� �'¢��r�'� C;��usau���att�� ��a��p�a�d ��V�vv, ua a�.�����s �h�
'
�`c�� Cc�r�st�lt�nt is �l��r�ir�� a��t f��� inste�d �f�har�ir��f�r��t��l services rer�d�red.
�l���r�t ��se Lar�;
Ir� �ddrt�o�, as ycs�z �re ��vare, i���r Yc�rk St�t� ur�y�tp�l Har�� �.�tl� I.�w §
10(1)(ii j��)�6} p� its r��zr�i�ipalit��s ta �d�pt l��al las�s r�l�tin� t� �e[t]h� ��quisiti�r�� � �,
rn�rz���m�nt ar�d i�s� �f its hy�h�v�ys, rc��ds� str��ts� �t��n�t�s �r�d pr�p��ym" P,s � ��n�r�l rtt��,
„th� r,�unicipal pc���r tr� re�ta�at� a b�sir��ss, c���upatza� c�r a�t�vity �rr�br���s d ir�plies the
pc��,°�r tc� li��r�s� �s � rnad� c�f re�ul��ian ar�d tc� z p�s� a li�ens� f�� s��ri�i��t in �ur�t tc�
��a��r th� �ost af r��c�l�ti�na'� t'�latt�r� �f Tr���e�e �r°�s°, �°�n�°tr°o �orpo v. I3�cr�4d�f 7°r���.rte�s �af Irr�.
Vil, oJ'1�Ir�r���c�e, 49 A,D,2d 4614 464 (2d I3�pt. 1975) I-�cavv���r, 66wh�r� � l���ns� c�r pe �t f�e is
irnpas�d �nder th� pa��r t� r��ulat�, th� a ou�t chaz°ged � �t b� �r�at�r th�n � s
r�asr�r��bly ��c�ss�ry t� �c���r the�c�sts �f iss��r��e� zr�sp�ct��a� �nd �r�for��rn�ntm�' Icf. at 4659 s°e�
crfs°c� 7'wir� Gak�� l)ev. �'c�t~p,, 1 ,1',3d �t I07 (`�I°�is ���rt has r�p�a��dly obs� �d th�t [th�
��r�ic�p�l p��ver tc� ���r�e sc�a�� o�st�t assa�i�t�d vaith th� �c�r�sid�r�tic�r� of � 1 d us�
�pp11��tI�r�] is limit�d by the r�quir�m�nt th�t �h� f�es ch�r��d b� r��s�nably n���ssa�y t� th�
���c� pllsl�ner�t c�f th� r��ul�tary pr��r�trto'$)9 K�rr��rr A,s�sa���t�s°, ���° �a 7"��vr� of IC�nt, 27
A.I7,3d 423 (2d I3�pt. 2Q06)a "T� th� �x��r�t �hat [th�] fe�s �ha.r��d ar� ��a�t�d f��• r���n��
p`Yrpos�s �r t� affs�t th� cost �f �e��ral ���re rn�r�tal cti�ras th�y ar� in��lid �s
ur��uthc�raz�d ta� , , m , 1�, (cit�tic�r�s arni�ted),
As dis��rss�d b�l��v, b�s�d �p�r� th� l��k af Ir�fo �t��ri ��r�t�in�d ir� th� T°c�
C�ns�►l��t�t9s pri�r ��v�ic�s sent tc� Ver�z�n Wxrel�ss, w� h�ve r�o �y ��'kr�r�vvin� if th� T"� 1
C�r�sultar�t�s f�� is �r�at�r th a surn r�as�r�ably n�c�ssa�y tc� cs�ve�° th� ��sts of issu�n��,
�r�sp�cti�n �nd er�Pc�r�e�enta or it"�h� f��s char��d �r� �r�ly fr�r th� 7'�r�r� ����i�lt�ntes r�ve��i�
pua�pc�s�s.
V�e�i�on fr�l�ss' �r°ir�r Ex��r►�nce r�vit 'T�wr►�s C:��s�rlt�nt
In 201 S� ��ri��n Wir�l�ss s�brnit��d a very sirr�ilaz° appli���ic�� �� th� �b�v�-r�fer�z���d
Applic�ti�n, fc�r th� �ap�rade �nd �dificatian c�f its �xi�tir�� �c�rr�rrrr�r�i�atiean f��ility lo��ted �t
23300 �fai� T�c��d ar� �ra�nt, As r�qu�st�d by th� T� , �'�ri�or� t7Jir�l�ss s�b itt�d a �4,aao
���s�rr�� f��" t� th� T°� r� in cc� �ctior� �itl, �h� ��vi��v �f s � by �'�wn's �c��s�lt�r�t, Aft�r
th� �ppli��tz�n ��s r��i���d, p�rsuar�t t� T°��rr� �c�d� §§ 2�0�74(A)(4}(b� �nd ���� our �ffic�
r�qu�st�d in�r�ic� frc�rr� th� 7`� �5 ��l'iSLiI� t, i�z �rd�r tc� d�t� Zi�e if a r��r�d cs�`any �f th�
escr��P f��w�s pa�sib��e
T`h� attach�d i�svai�e (th� ��i�Jri��t In��i��"� �v� r���i��d �or�tain�d th� �`c�1l�win� ei�ht
vv�rds c�f det��l; 6�Sit� Plar� Appli��tz�n R��i�� d Ar���y�ys: �Z� �Jri��t�'a ��s�d upc�r� this
]a�k ��' In�'� �tian, th�r� is �� ��y fc�� ��rizc�n �TJir�l�ss ta kr��� �f the "Tc� 's ��r�sultant
spends c�r�e h�ur �r t�r� h��zrs r�vi��in� th� Appli��tis�.� rr�at�r�alsa I� addita�n, �c.cs��°dir�� tc� the
I'o«ra ��nsult�i�t's �bsit�, �h�y app��r t� b� based in Flc�r�da. I�c��s th� �4,000 ���lud� th�ir
tr�u�l �xp�r�ses? Purst�at�t t� th� abr���-�°�f���r���d �as� 1a�v, b�fc�re it a����s ta p�y this �'��9
V�rzz�rr t�/ir�l�ss r�sp�ctfully r�qu�st ��nfi �tir�ra c�f the f�ll��rir��e (1) ��h�� is th� T'cs�rn
���sult�rrt's hc�urly r�t�; (2) h��m.�r�y h�urs d��s the T'ov�i� Cc�r�su�t�nt �stirr;�t�th�y w1tl sp�r�d
r�vi��°ir�� th� �pply��ti�r�� (3) is Ch� Tc�vvr�'s �c�r��u�tar►t ch�r�ing Veri�rsc� VJir�l�ss �c�r trav�l
exp�ns�s; (4} ��ill th� ni�n�y paad tc��ard th� fee b� pl���d irct� the T`c��rr�'s �s�rc��✓ ����tizr�f �ncl
will a �a�pl�te, ik�miz�d ii�vcsi�� �l�arly d�n��r�stz°atin� th� sp��ifi� `�c�rk �nd�r°t�k�r► �r►d th�
t�rr�� ����nd�d by �h� °Tc��rn°s Cc�nsult t b� pra��d�d� �nd (5� I� th� ����z�t th�t th� �c���r�t h�ld
in �surc�w by th� �'c�wn is n��r� th�n th� arric�ur�t at'�h� ��tu�l irc�c�iein� �t th� ��r�clusxr�n o�th�
s
proj�ct, will ih�°T� pro ptly r�fiand th�i°�rnainxn�bal ��to V�rzzon V�I�r�less?
T'h� yc�u f�r yc� �r�ti�ipat�d �tter�tic�n tc� this ir�atC�i°.
�ir�c�r�ly,
� ���N .d' ��'�����wd'N � tl,,„„. �
a'J �+'d�� N ,ro�..,- '�� �� � ��M�M.
� �
�n� ir� �is�l
�;ncl..
J � ���
/ � 1�� � �µ YM1,,
I�� w ��� �� � i ( ".M'M��il"� �r.'�4�& �'�`"�yfe W�"" �V��� yg peC�/
�e
��� � ���y�� ������������my��"`�w��n�� .,�.m._,���..�.,w..a., ...,'IYVOItrCYP
1 �
,. ......�»,..,._�...,.�,...�..�.,.I�.�.Y..,..�._.�.�.......,....�,,.,.,.,.,...�.,
7 . 8I a ark 1 - 6/3/2015 3989
octon, FL 9 3 ....�..._�_W.�_.�_�._.. ..,._.��,�.�.,_�w�.
�I: ( 77} 3 - 1 F x: ( 77)
��.,��
� ��� � � 0 U� �M�
ILL TO �
�_�.�.�...�,.��.�„M�,.�._.m�,�_�,�.�..�.�...�,�_����.� JUN 1 1 20i5
T�wn of Southold
eather Lanza,AICP, Plannin ir ��, � _
P.O. ox 1179 ������P��'�����
5outhold, NY 11971 �"�'������9oard
��.��,��
Project Ref/P :
VZW 23300 Main Rd
Description Rat� Amount
,.��..���,�,,�. . ��.�._�.�_�.�..�..�� 1u_�....��.....�.�._�...�. .�.._..._._____-__ _�._......�..... �..�.�..�.�n.�
S)t�Appll tlon eview and Analysis: Site 'Ori�nt 4,004.00 4,000.00 �
Site Application submitted by Verfz�n Wireless;to moditylupgrade
equlprnent on exislin st cture lo ted at 23300 ain oad, rient
Review completed 02-18/2015
SCT : 1000�16-5-13.
PU CHAS 8127 �
� � � �4ro�¢D�.��
�o������������,.��a�
WILi.IAM McQUAID DUFFY ��„-��r����''�"`"����, SCOTT A. RUSSELL
TOWN ATTORNEY �"� '��" ����° '`'��,., Supervisor
bill.duffy@town.southold.ny.us ���� `�'�'� ���`"w"w
� ^� ",
STEPHEN F. KIELY � � �w�"i Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY �,,�a �: Southold, New York 11971-0959
stephen.kiely@town.southold.ny.us ;, � ��"
���,w���,,�'� �����"�� Telephone(631) 765-1939
"`��'•w �U��, �" Facsimile(631) 765-6639 �
���'C-�-������a.'�"�.�'��
ATTORNEY ���� COP� ,
OFFICE OF THE TOWN �-L-�U`
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
��� r-FI.��T �p��
� � �1� ���1����y I�� �� I
June 28, 2016
m.N�.9� � � ��'����
Soutt�o9d To�un � �
Benjamin Weisel, Esq. ��i��a���rb��oard
Amato Law Group, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 901
Garden City, NY 11530
Re: Consultant Fee for the Proposed Verizon Wireless Up-grades & Modifications at
Southold Town Animal Shelter
Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic
SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1
Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Weisel:
We have been attempting to process the application you have made, referenced
above, on behalf of Verizon Wireless, and have been unable to do so because the
application is not complete. As we have explained to you multiple times, both on the
telephone and via email, the application cannot be considered complete until you submit
the Technical Consultant Fee pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-74 A (4). The
minimum amount stated in the Town Code that must be submitted to the Town for the
Technical Consultant is $8,500.00. For modifications such as the application that your
office has submitted for Verizon, the fee is reduced from the amount stated in the code
by more than 40% to $4,000.00.
The Town must collect this fee prior to processing the application any further.
This fee is a reasonable amount to cover the cost of the Technical Consultant's review,
and cannot be reduced further.
Please also note that for all wireless applications, the Town is poised to move
swiftly to grant the permits necessary, just as soon as the application is verified by our
Technical Consultant to meet the relevant federal and local requirements. Your firm has
benjamin Weisel, Esq.
June 28, 2016
Page -2-
seen evidence of such through the other similar applications they have successfully
processed here.
We look forward to receiving the fee so we may proceed with your application.
Please call with any questions.
Very truly yours,
�� � ���
William Duffy, Town Attorney
cc: Southold Town Planning Department
a���F -�'� MAILING ADDRESS:
PLANNING BOAR,D MEMBERS ���������� ���������"� P.O. Box 117J
DONALD J.WILCENSKI � �^�'� ����" m . Southold, NY 11971
Chair �� ��"� `�""� ����
� � `� OFFICE LOCATION:
r�,�
WILLIAM J.CREMERS �� �� � �t� Town Hall Annex
PIERCE RAFFERTY ��, �� �� ��`� 54375 State Route 25
JAMES H.RICH III `+, '�,�°,��° �(�I ��" ��� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.)
MARTIN H.SIDOR ,����� '��'� °e�^� Southold, NY �
�,:� ,��, ��,� �:1��
Telephone: 631 765-1938
www.southol dtowiuiy.gov
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 18, 2016
Benjamin Weisel, Esq.
Amato Law Group, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 901
Garden City, NY 11530
Re: Consultant Fee for the Proposed Verizon Wireless Up-grades & Modifications at Southold
Town Animal Shelter
Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic
SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Weisel:
As stated in our letter to you dated February 24, 2016 (enclosec�, pursuant to §280-74A(d) of
the Town Code, the Planning Board will hire a Technical Consultant to aid in the review of the
above-referenced application and the submission of$4,000.00 into an escrow account with the
Town Comptroller's Office to cover the cost of the Technical Consultant's review is necessary.
The consultant's fee must be submitted to the Town prior to moving forward with this
application, as per the Town Code.
Please remit a check in the amount of$4,000.00 payable to the Town of Southold.
We look forward to receiving the fee so we may proceed with your application. Please call with
any questions.
Very truly yours,
� �.W�
��������
�
Brian A. Cummings
Planner
Encl.
cc: William Duffy, Town Attorney
OFFICE L CATI N• �'���'�*�''`�r�., MAILING ADDRESS:
Town Hall Annex � �'���„� ���/"�""�`���� P.O. Box 1179
54375 State Route 25 ����" �����°•� Southold, NY 11971
(cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) , Telephone• 631 765-1938
Southold, NY www.southoldtowiiny.gov
�
��� ��'���
���������1�.�M w W�"������.
ti� g'��
.�"+''�.�".7,_'�*�^,�r')`_.J.;�"'".�.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 24, 2016
Benjamin Weisel, Esq.
Amato Law Group, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 901
Garden City, NY 11530
Re: Proposed Verizon Wireless Up-grades & Modifications at Southold Town Animal Shelter
Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic
SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Weisel:
The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to up-grade an existing facility and
related equipment at the existing site referenced above. Pursuant to §280-130A of the Southold
Town Code, the Planning Department is required to provide a brief report to the Building
Department concerning the proposed wireless communications up-grades to determine whether
they meet the guidelines for wireless facilities.
Pursuant to §280-74A(d) of the Town Code, the Planning Board will hire a Technical Consultant
to aid in the review of the application and hereby requires the submission of$4,000.00 into an
escrow account with the Town Comptroller's Office to cover the cost of the Technical
Consultant's review.
Please remit a check in the amount of$4,000.00 payable to the Town of Southold. Any unused
portion of the Technical Consultant's Fee will be returned to you.
Our consultant is CityScape Consultants, Inc. They may contact you directly regarding this
application.
If ou have an uestions re ����� �
his office. Thank ou in advance for youapp�������n or ��� prca����, �f�����1c� r��� ����������� '��'
Y Y q g�. ng ��"��
t y r prompt payment.
Very truly yours,
�� � �. �
�.����,���.s���.�
Brian A. Cumming
s���
Planner
�"'�P"�M�" �"�" I
��������M����w�ri�� I��rr� �
Consultants, Inc.
7050 West Palmetto Park Road#15-652
Boca Raton,Florida 33433
Tel: 877.438-2851 Fax: 877.220-4593
�� ���
������t�� ��
�� � 4 � ���
LETTER OF AGREEMENT � ��f,�,,���'.��m..w��.,d���.���
February 26, 2016 �:��� I ��a � ��� �I�11��`.i �
���� , � , �
���r��np��r}��rv���ri��
��tl��u�r��II�����
Heather Lanza, AICP, Planning Director
�.�,� .�„��
Town of Southold
53095 Route 25
Southold,New York 11971
Re: Agreement between Town of Southold,New York(Town) and CityScape Consultants, Inc.
(Consultant) dated March 25, 2013 (Agreement)
Dear Ms. Lanza,
As per the above referenced Agreement between Town and Consultant, Consultant agrees to provide
a review and analysis for an Application from Verizon Wireless for modifications and upgrades to an
existing tower located 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic,New York, SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1
Review services for the Application will be performed at the agreed upon rate of; four thousand
dollars ($4,000). There will be no additional costs or fees associated with the review of this
Application and/or follow-up letters relating to this Application.
Consultant will provide the services as outlined in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, of the Agreement.
Sincerely,
� �.,.,,��' nJ�'�„��'��•t.�rp_.__.
Elizabeth Herington-Smith
OFFICE LOCATION: ��������� � �, MAILING ADDRESS:
Town Hall Annex ���� ��� �� '���"` r P.O. Box 1179
54375 State Route 25 �� ""� �'���r�� Southold, NY 11971
(cor. Main Rd. &Youngs AveJ y� �"�� � �°�p`'��
� �:� Tele hone: 631765-1838
Southold, NY � � � p
��� ��� �, �y` www.southoldtownny.gov
����� ,����!�
� �������a�����'��
�� �� .�:���� ����'�.a�`
PLANNING BOAR,D OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 24, 2016
Mr. Richard L. Edwards
d/b/a CityScape Consultants, Inc.
7050 Palmetto Park Road
Boca Raton, FL 33433
Re: Verizon Wireless Up-grades @ Southold Town Animal Shelter
Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY 11971
SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1
Dear Mr. Edwards:
The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to modify and/or up-grade equipment at
an existing wireless facility. Pursuant to §280-74(A)(4) of the Southold Town Code, the Planning
Department is seeking to provide a brief report to the Building Department concerning the
proposed wireless communications up-grades and whether or not this application warrants full
site plan review.
Please provide an estimate for the cost of your consulting services to determine whether the
application meets the General Requirements in the Southold Town Code for maximum
permissible exposure. Should the Planning Board approve your estimate, a purchase order will
be provided authorizing this application's review to begin.
Please, do not start any review until you are authorized to do so in writing.
If you have any question or comments, please contact me�
Best regards,
����� � `� � �`��.�
�M.��"
Brian Cummings
Planner
www.southoldtownnv.qov; Weblink located on bottom left of home page, Planning Dept.
folder; Applications; Wireless Modifications; Pending; 1000-75.-5-14.1 Verizon Wireless at
Southold Town Animal Shelter
OFFICE LOCATION: �,���"�"�'""�'�`r���`r���� MAILING ADDRESS:
Town Hall Annex �` '��" ���"�* ��, P.O. Box 1179
54375 State Route 25 �����"� '�r�",�r��u"�, Southold, NY 11971
(cor. Main Rd. &Youngs AveJ �
Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935
www.southoldtowxuiy.gov
��� ,���143
�'�����7����t�`�"�����
��'����;�r.�a'�����
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 24, 2016
Benjamin Weisel, Esq.
Amato Law Group, PLLC
666 Old Country Road, Suite 901
Garden City, NY 11530
Re: Proposed Verizon Wireless Up-grades & Modifications at Southold Town Animal Shelter
Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic
SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Weisel:
The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to up-grade an existing facility and
related equipment at the existing site referenced above. Pursuant to §280-130A of the Southold
Town Code, the Planning Department is required to provide a brief report to the Building
Department concerning the proposed wireless communications up-grades to determine whether
they meet the guidelines for wireless facilities.
Pursuant to §280-74A(d) of the Town Code, the Planning Board will hire a Technical Consultant
to aid in the r�view of the application and hereby requires the submission of$4,000.00 into an
escrow account with the Town Comptroller's Office to cover the cost of the Technical
Consultant's review.
Please remit a check in the amount of $4,000.00 payable to the Town of Southold. Any unused
portion of the Technical Consultant's Fee will be returned to you.
Our consultant is CityScape Consultants, Inc. They may contact you directly regarding this
application.
If you have any questions regarding this application or its process, please do not hesitate to call
this office. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment.
Very truly yours,
�� � � ,�
������.���,���
�
Brian A. Cummings����-����
Planner
��� ��� .������
�' �� ��ro �� ���� � �.������
� �� � "° FOR IN�TERNAI� USE uN� � �
' l f:f� �lb.. I� 1��J��a � �
ITE PLAN USE ���`E�IVi���NATI �
. $ �������d������
, �� . . �'b����d�'�����V�� I
. ����:��� ����rW���t���E����
c� � � � �
� � Date Sent' �` ' d �
� . _ . Y m.�.._..�_��..�� �_
. . ,� _.�....,��...–.
, -.
,�
. .
Date � �""�°� � � � .�..
M .�.�--�
. �m...
a
�
� � aw
�
.
� a�e:��..� ��` �� �� -� �� �� � .� .�� �
�Project N ��� ��� "������"M,� "�� G_ �'����.���" �
.,.r
� � � .� ww� � �.���
� �.... _�.. � ��a y���r,
���,� ,�
Project ���s-��� �, .. . .
. �
. . �
. �.
� _ - �� ��� w � � ��
� Zoning ��m���:m_ .�.�.. �...-�.
Suffotk County Tax Map No•:1�000�� — , �
�,� '
�
��� ..
, . �, , � .
���w���t� W �... �.�
�, ortin doc �ti�ar��a�to.�
� - um��
� e ��i���t����w and supp 9
� �� ����t!uil�It��� '���r����: �
�c���:
r�a �s�� r,.��� �wr����� ��wc��a�d be ���rrai�i���.) � W , i
� � .
�,, � �
initial Deterrriination as to whether use is p���������a � '��
���
� �.��
�. �
�
, �
: � mation as to �,r,��� 1���� s��� ��� is !�� wair�:�... . xX � ,
� .
lnitial�Deterrn' � �
. .
.
�� �
�
��.�._.e�.�-�---��m� �,�.,,.��„��__..�,��,. �
�� �..m�.
�� � ..��.--�-
, . �..__�e ..�._.__..�...�.
� � �
, .��—.,.� .� �,��, ��-w� �cr��r ,
�.��.�..���.�� gign� �.�r �
' � �efeFral.� � �� �������
.
Planning Depa�ment (P.D.) .
� D�te of Commenfi:�..���
.
.
f
p.D. i�ate Received:,f�---- ��
- Comments:
.
. ` � t S at ff Reviewer
• Signature ofi Planning Dep.• ,
� ������ �������������i����� . . � � .
���:�•
����_��-
����
. , �m�
._�.._�,�-
Decision: �
��.,_
�� nf Riiilclina In.��m����
w��..�.�.
na111fP���~
ei��� �nPctnr
TOWN OF SpUTFIOLD BUILDING rr,RIV1IT APPLICATION CHECKI.,IST
BUILDING��'PARTMENT I7o ypu have or need the following,before applying?
TQWN HALL Board ofHealth
SOUTFIOLD,NY 11971 4 sets ofBuildingPlans
TEL:(631)765-1$02 Planning Board approval
FAX:(631)765-9502 s���y
SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PEIZNIIT NO. Check
Septic Form
N.Y.S.D:�,C.
Trustees
C.O.Application
Flood Permit
Examined ,20 Single&Separate
Storm-Water Assessment Form
Contact: r �,
,�g�p���wed ,20 Mailto������r�'���� Q� ��iP ���'�� �,.
_ d
Disapproved alc_ �_ �' "� �;, . r� �" �,ff y
�Y �,�.�
..�..._ &'h,c�ne: ��,�•:�.r�"������'aV���'�
Expiration ,20
_ . ' Buiiding Inspector
_ r...... _ . .
� �i
�. -� � '.�P����CATTUN FOR BUILDIltiTG PERMIT
I
JAN 1 5 2016 Date Ja°"an' � ,z0is
I _.�" 1NSTRUCTIONS
f
�� � w _ . � i
�,This application h+i9,1�'1'��,�,ccsaaa�p,t�;tely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4
sets of pp�:rss k�c"�tar�t�g�ft�ti plan to scale.Fee according to schedule.
b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or
areas,and waterways.
c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d.Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit
shall be kept on the premises avaitable for inspection throughout the work.
e.No building shall be occupied or used in rvhole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector
issues a Certificate of Occupancy.
f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of
issuance or hzs not been compieted within 18 months from such date.If no zoning arnendments or other regulations affecting the
property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the eatension of the permit for an
addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the$uilding Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suff'olk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or
Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demalition as herein described.The
applicant agrees to camply with all appiicabla laws,ordinances,building code,hotasing cade,and regulations,and to admit
authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ���� r� �����1������Ts�n��
z� :
(S igraatuare of applicant or name,if a corporation)
c/ el�matra La�r Group, PLLC
666 Old Coun Road Suite 901
rden Ga . e�w Yor�C 11.530
(Mailing address of applicant)
State whether applicant is owner,(essee,agent,architect,engineer,general contractor,electrician,plumber or builder
Lessee �
Name of owner of prernises x�,,a of soucnoia
(As on the tax roll or latest deed)
If applic�n.:�a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer
(Name and titie of corporate officer)
Builders License No.
Plurnbers License Na
Electricians License No.
Other Trade's License No.
1. Location af land on which proposed work will be done:
.�:�-� Peconi.c
House Number �a�r�e�� p Hamlet
��� �"°�`"'�"��`�e�"R.,.��'"����.
County Tax Map No. 1p00 Section o�s Black s Lot ra.i
F iled Map No._ Lot�.,,,^.f�..�Y_.�-
_��...�.
Subdivision_ J_�. ..�_�.m-.�.---�-------
2. State existing use and accupancy of�a�'ert�i�es�fl��.�i��tt�e�d�c1 use and accupancy oip�rapo�ed con�t�ruc�t�ian�n�����1��
� �
a. Existing use and occupancy '��� �� s°u�"'�'� �'°��`�� °����t���ffi-�---�����������i.l�cy.
� �� ��i��i� ..��-_..��—
b. Intended use and occupancy�_ > --�-�~~
Alteration
Addztion_�_ ��'� --�---
3. Nature of work(check which app[icahle):New Building��r W��������,���� � `���������y��?���
� R81110V31. �BTT1011t10C1�_��__�_.�... den�icte: Qn t �±�Gg�&j7�.i�1l�ara�tsaac'�iti�:Ga.
Repali� �ukrm3ttefl
rt�rr�vriaag;5
4. Estimated Cast Szs,oao.00
F'0e �t�r�r�,ri�h and i��ctisslaasa�a�eck heiein.
� (Ta be paid an filing this appiication)
5. If dwekling,number af dwelling units�Nte Number of dweiling units on each flaar
If garage, number of cars
6. If business,cammercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use. pol�c�: r�'��'���-y--'"� —.-
Rear Depth�. .�
7. I)imensions of existing structures,if any:Frant �f`� M--�--�
Height Number of Stories
Rear�.,,.—......��
bimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: FNu����o�tories
Depth Height
8, Dimensions of entire new eonstruction:�^a'o�at.
�/A ��a� �7���h
Height Number af Stories
zo� 4���r 3���q�rth s8ri�bie BCres: iz.is
9. Size of lot:Frc����' �
10.Date ef�`�?rchase 3uY I.1 1968 N8ri7e Of Fdriri�I dWI1�P WilZiam Af- Beebe &Robert D'Ano Bo d
1 l.Zane or use district in which premises are situated R-$o
12,Does proposed constructian violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulatinn?YES_.Nd g
13.Will tot be re-graded?YES_____Na g �ill excess fill be removed fram premises?YES_NO A
� Phone No.(631) 765-1800
14.Names of Owner of�re���i��s�p1W° �f souct,�ia A�c�y��s� ��°��������r��-�� �����Na tsbo) 663-16R7 x101
�F.L Lngincernn�/ScerGt H. C�3s�a�t"��C�Cc:SS :" '
Name of Architect ���r��� p�acs�c:No.
� �1ame of��rr�Y'�a���tr�b �
15 �s.Is�kri��ara�rert��ui��ti�� ��t� Ccet r�£'a�i�Val��utl�rad or a freshwater wetland?*YES
NO x/e
*��Y��,�aC7��'�'Y�&:�B.T�"1"�"�'"-�3 T4�4���`I����f�.F.C.PERMITS MA�Y BE REQUIRED.
1�.(�„��ai�p��c��c;rty��w�at��i�z.��t��e�:t caf a i��a4��+�t�aaad?*YES
*� I�`1"�;�„��.�.C:. 4'Et��'fZT`�T�tiF�"�`F��C�EC�L;dIZ��.
16.Provide survey,tn scaie,with accurate foundatian plan and distances to praperty lines.
17.If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must pravide topographicat data on survey.
18.Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this prnperty?*YE� NO �/�
*Ip YE5,PROVIDE A COPY.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
�G6�3C��9"'�'�'� ��ss�� �
��Tt"aY� raf Adew�cark: �kti5ll
a�ims��=� �"��t���"����' �'`��� ��ing duly swom,depases and says that(s)he is the applicant
:lrrt�a� �+al�leru Ve�...�, s'�:cra�T�xr�tl.ess..�....�._-.—��--
� �:Nd�a��,�c�k'is��ivicdutl su�r�h�.�+�c�artract����.�c+a'����7��,
�..�.�
(�)F-IC'tS t�t��,.�.� 5env'ar I�s��i�eee-�: e�i:ane�r�, � _--��"—'"-�—
(Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.)
of said owner or owners,and'is��������1���$����i�p���� �°��������,����y�edge and belie�f�,and hat t ewnlrk will be lication:
t ha t a l l s t a t e m e n t s c o n t a i n e d a n 4 P
performed in the manner set f�s�th i��,t�ae�g�p�z�aticas7��le�i thex�ews t h.
��v�ao°sh to before me�"�i
day of " � ���� ,�N
- �,t�J�L.I�E�.9�at�cr� �
�������
�ti � �agaa�tt�r�o p�ic�nt.
m Natary�0.1��� �u�d�fi�d In Sufrdk County ��I p,�:: �,��n�a�.���a
� Cam[�i5s�45Yh�d��"MS1Gh3b��'��BL y�it1�: S�&�ira� Eca�in�.��-�+��tiypffi�nk�.
� _
�L�.°' � � �
`�'I����RV'���.��1� ����'�7......., �,Il.,,.,
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT
130' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER
PECONIC,NEW YORK
Prepared for
Verizon Wireless
Verizon Site: Peconic
December 14, 2015
��� ��� � �
���������''��
� �
� ' � � �"
� ��
���� ����� �
� ��'�1 '�
�
APT Project#NY141LTE401/NY141AWS2850
❑3 SADDLEBROOK DRIVE•KILLINGWORTH,CT 06419•PHONE 860-663-1697•FAX 860-663-0935
._............................. �........��................����............_....._................................... ��.....��������
� 116 GRANDVIEW ROAD•CONWAY,NH 03818•PHONE 603-496-5853•FAX 603-447-2124
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT
130' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER
PECONIC, NEW YORK
prepared for
Verizon Wireless
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C. (APT) performed a condition assessment and
structural analysis of this 130-foot self-supporting tower. The analysis was performed for
Verizon Wireless's proposed removal of their nine panel antennas at 100' and installation of
nine new panels, nine remote radio heads, (RRHs) three power/fiber distribution boxes (D-
boxes) and six diplexers as detailed below. The antennas will be fed by six existing 7/8"
waveguide cables and three additional hybrid power/fiber cables. Nine existing 7/8" waveguide
cables are to be removed.
Our analysis indicates the tower meets the requirements of the New York State Building Code
with the proposed equipment changes. Evaluation of the existing base foundations could not be
conclusively performed. See narrative herein.
INTRODUCTION:
A condition assessment and structural analysis was performed on the above-mentioned
communications tower by APT for Verizon Wireless. The tower is located at 41450 Main
Road in Peconic,New York.
APT previously climbed the structure to record information regarding physical and dimensional
properties of the structure and its appurtenances. We revisited the site on December 7, 2015 to
record the existing inventory.
The analysis also utilized a structural analysis by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc., KMCE
Project #090507.00 Revision 4 dated August 25, 2010, and proposed equipment changes
proposed by Verizon Wireless.
The analysis was performed in accordance with the New York State Building Code and TIA-
222 using the following antenna inventory(proposed equipment shown in bold text):
._____W. ._._.�_........�._....._._.�
All-Points Technology Corporation
116 Grandview Road 3 Saddlebrook Drive
Conway, NH 03818 Killingworth, CT 06419
(603) 496-5853 (860) 663-1697
Yerizon Wireless December 14, 201 S
130'Self-Supporting Tower, Peconic, NY Page 2
Yerizon Site:Peconic APTJob #NY141LTE401/NY141AWS2850
��........����_������..��._���.�.��.�����....................
Antenna Elev. Mount Coax.
16 6 ommdirectional whips 130 (3)6 sidearms WWWWW�m���� �1 mmmITITIT
._._..��...���.�._....._�..
', ' , , /2", 3/8"
3' x 2', (1) 800-10121, (2) 7262.00 panel antennas, 130' (3) 10' sector mounts (19)7/8", '
(6)TMAs, (3)DBXNH-6565A, (2)DBXNH-85855 panels, I (2) 3/4"
2' dish& 3' dish
(3)LNX-6515DS, (6)AIR 21 B2A-B4P panels, (3)TMAs, 115' (3) 14' sector mounts (21) 1-1/4"
(3)RRHs, "s uid"D-box
(6) SBNHH-1D65B, (3)DBXNH-8585B panels, ' 100' (3) 15' sector mounts (7)7/8",
(3)B13 RRH2x60 RRHs,(3)RRH2x60-AWS RRHs, (6) 7/8",
(3)B25 RRH2x60 RRHs,(6)FD9R6004 diplexers, (3) 1-5/8"
8'yagi, (4)20' omni whips (2 inv.), (1) 18' omni whi , GPS ' hvbrid
Vacant mount 93' 2' sidearm , None
6'yagi 91' Leg 7/8"
Vacant mounts 88' (3) 10' sector mounts N.A.
. _WWWWW_WWWWWWWWWWW..�. ���_
Vacant mounts 72, 7$' (2)2' sidearms None
.__ �,
6' omnidirectional whip 38' 3' sidearm 3/4"
' Si�c BXA-70090/4, three BXA-171090/8 panels, one 8' yagi, four 20' omni whips,
one 4' dipole and one GPS currently installed, fed by nineteen 1-5/8" lines.
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
• General Observations: The tower, a galvanized steel structure, appeared to be in
sound condition. No signs of movement or overstress of the tower were observed.
• Legs: Leg members appeared to be in sound condition.
• Bracing: Bracing and connections were visually observed to the maximum extent
practicable. All braces and connections that were observed appeared to be sound, with
no loose or missing bolts noted.
• Antenna Connections: Antenna mounting hardware was in good condition, with
galvanized mounts and hardware prevalent.
• Splice Connections: Observed splice bolts and connections were in good condition.
No loose or missing bolts or nuts were observed.
All-Points Technology CorporatioW��m�mmmmITmm�
n
116 Grandview Road 3 Saddlebrook Drive
Conway, NH 03818 Killingworth, CT 06419
(603) 496-5853 (860) 663-1697
Verizon Wireless December 14, 201 S
130'Self-Supporting Tower, Peconic, NY Page 3
Verizon Site:Peconic APT Job #NY141LTE401/NY141AWS2850
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS:
Methodology:
The structural analysis was done in accordance with the New York State Building Code and
TIA/EIA-222, Revision F (TIA), Structural Standards„_for__Steelw_AntennammTowers and Antenna
Su�portin� Structures; and the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Manual of
Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, Ninth Edition.
The analysis was conducted using a fastest mile wind speed of 85 mph (equivalent to 100 mph
3-second gust) and 3/4" of radial ice over the structure and associated appurtenances. The TIA
Standard requires a basic wind speed of 85 miles per hour for Suffolk County, New York.
Two loading conditions were evaluated in accordance with TIA/EIA-222-F to determine tower
capacity. The more demanding of the two cases is used to calculate tower capacity:
• Case 1 =Wind Load (without ice) +Tower Dead Load
• Case 2= 0.75 Wind Load (with ice) +Ice Load+Tower Dead Load
The TIA/EIA standard permits a one-third increase in allowable stresses for towers less than
700-feet tall. Allowable stresses of tower members were increased by one-third when
computing the tower capacity values shown below.
Analysis Results:
Analysis of the tower was conducted in accordance with the criteria outlined herein with
antenna changes as previously described. The following table summarizes the results of the
analysis based on stresses of individual leg and bracing members:
..... ...................._._..�.,.
Elevation Le s Bracin
110'-130' 13% 22%
90'-110' 29% 50%
70'-90' 33% 38%
50'-70' 44% 56%
30'-50' 45% 45%
10'-30' 40% 71%
0'-10' 44% 88%
Bracing, Splice and Anchor Bolts:
Connection bolts were evaluated under the proposed loading. All bolts were found to be
adequately sized to support the proposed loads.
.. .....................���................_.
All-Points Technology Corporation
116 Grandview Road 3 Saddlebrook Drive
Conway, NH 03818 Killingworth, CT 06419
(603) 496-5853 (860) 663-1697
Verizon Wireless December 14, 201 S
130'Self-Supporting Tower, Peconic, NY Page 4
Verizon Site:Peconic APTJob #NY141LTE401/NY141AWS2850
Base Foundation:
Evaluation of the existing base foundations could not be conclusively performed, as detailed
information on their design or construction was not available to APT. If the foundation
reinforcement specified in the KM Consulting Engineers August 25, 2010 structural analysis
report was completed the foundations are adequate for the proposed changes.
Base reactions imposed with the equipment changes were calculated as follows:
Compression: 225.9 kips
Uplift: 172.8 kips
Shear: 21.7 kips
Overturning Moment: 2516 ft-kips
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Our structural analysis indicates that the 130-foot self-supporting tower located at 41450 Main
Road in Peconic, New York meets the requirements of the New York State Building Code
with Verizon Wireless's proposed equipment changes.
Evaluation of the existing base foundations could not be conclusively performed, as detailed
information on their design or construction was not available to APT. If the foundation
reinforcement specified in the KM Consulting Engineers August 25, 2010 structural analysis
report was completed the foundations are adequate for the proposed changes.
LIMITATIONS:
This report is based on the following:
1. Tower is properly installed and maintained.
2. All members are in an undeteriorated condition.
3. All required members are in place.
4. All bolts are in place and are properly tightened.
5. Tower is in plumb condition.
6. All tower members were properly designed, detailed, fabricated, and installed and
have been properly maintained since erection.
All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C. (APT) is not responsible for modifications completed
prior to or hereafter which APT is not or was not directly involved. Modifications include but
are not limited to:
��.��..�.....__................ ......... �..�...�.�.......�..��
All-Points Technology Corporation
116 Grandview Road 3 Saddlebrook Drive
Conway, NH 03818 Killingworth, CT 06419
(603) 496-5853 (860) 663-1697
Verizon Wireless December 14, 2015
130'Self-Supporting Tower, Peconic, NY Page S
Verzzon Site:Peconic APT Job #NY141LTE401/NY141AWS2850
1. Replacing or strengthening bracing members.
2. Reinforcing vertical members in any manner.
3. Adding or relocating torque arms or guys.
4. Installing antenna mounting gates or side arms.
APT hereby states that this document represents the entire report and that it assumes no
liability for any factual changes that may occur after the date of this report. All representations,
recommendations, and conclusions are based upon the information contained and set forth
herein. If you are aware of any information which is contrary to that which is contained herein,
or you are aware of any defects arising from the original design, material, fabrication and
erection deficiencies, you should disregard this report and immediately contact APT. APT
disclaims all liability for any representation, recommendation, or conclusion not expressly
stated herein.
_......................................._...����..��........................................�_�_�.w_w.a.a
All-Points Technology Corporation
116 Grandview Road 3 Saddlebrook Drive
Conway, NH 03818 Killingworth, CT 06419
(603) 496-5853 (860) 663-1697
Appendix A
Towe�Schematic
������ � ���..
..,... ......... 130..�,f� � �.
.. ....._... �, I ... � �7' ,
N,�„
�� `� '� ��� DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING
_ , _ �, me �..._ _._�.
TYPE ELEVATION � TYPE ELEVA710N
� ,� fi'x T omm whip..... ......... 130 ......... LNX-fi515DS-T4M.... ..... 115 ...... ......
�"� � "' ^ 16'x 2 5'omni whip 130� LNX�515DS-T4M 115
� N � � � „ „ , „ . , , ,,.,,,, ... .. ,,,,, „ „ , ...
a - .... B sidearm I130 GPS ..,,,,,, 100„
,,., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .,, , ,, ,
m�' 6`sidearm �.1�tl � qP)S'BA1HH-9CI65B 1U0
�� � .� '� 800/0121 .... . 130� , „�„�, �21sBNHH-1D85B 100 ....
�, � � ..... .............. ,NHH-1 D85B_.,.,.,.,. ,100......... .....
e
� "' �. (�� DBXNH 6565A VTM ,,, 130 ,,, DBXNH-B5B5B-VTM ,,, 100
�. �.� .... ... „ .., , ,.........
,,,,,, „ � ,,,,,, � 1100F1 --�.,�� DBXNH£565A-VTM 130 DBXNH-8505B-VTM 100
� I � ��I DBXNHE565AVTM 130, DBXNHB505B-VTM IN00
�, � .,,, ,,,,,,,,,m...,,,,,, „ m„ , a,,,, �. a,,,,,, . ,,,,,,,,,
� '��. ' ' y DBXNH�5B5A-VTM 130 � �������� -��----���0�
� (2)RFS FD9R6004 2C 3L diplexer 100
.I �7�.XM3#�6k�5�,hsV'Yd�1 ...... 190 ......... (2)RFS FDBR8004_2C 3L diplexer 70D„ . ,,,.......
_.
,., „ � , 7262�a 130 (2)RFS FDBR6004 2C-3L diplexer 100
� ' ._ .... . __., _ ,. ,,.� .,,._, .. ... .... .
`� � i� �i "6: 7262 xz 130 ALU B13 RRH2x60 100
� � . , ..... _ ,.,.,,, ,. ,..,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, , , ,, .. ..
� � „_,,.,,, A , ,. ., ., ,,, ,. ,, ,
� ;; , � ,' 3�,2'panel �,� 130 ALUB73RRH2zfi0 ,� 1Q0
� � . „ � 1�TMA B"x 12"� 130 ALU B13 RRH2z80 100
, ��,,,,,,,,,,, „,.�,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�, ,..,.. „�., ,,,,,,,,„ _,„ . ,..,,,,,,,,,_,�
;� � (2)�TMA 8'z 12 130 ALU RRH2x60-AWS w/brackat 100
, �� (2)TMA B x 12 130� ALU RRH2x6�-AWS wPoracket 100
. ,.. ,,,,, ..... ..... .. ..... . .,e... „„,...,,,...,, ,,.
10"seclormount���� 1.iU�� pLURRH2x60-pW3w/tirecket 100 �
¢ �¢ 90 0 fl �� ' . 10 seclor mouM.... ,,,,,, ,,,,,,, 130 .... ALU B25 RRH2x60.,. ......�100 ... ..
,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ..
z �z N��� ������ � ,.- , �I 10 seclor mounl,,, 130 ALU B25 RRH2x60 100
� ,- 2'dish,rw radome 130 �ALU B25 RRH2�c60 100
� � 3'dish,no rodome 130� Raycap RDC3315-PFdB J-box 100 �
,., ..............
` 20�x 2 5'omnl whlp 120-100 � �Raycap RDC-331 SPF�B J hox 700
� � ,� � 20 x 2.5'omni whiP „ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ 120-100 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, IRapcap RDC3315-PF�B J,box ,,,,,, 100 ...
„��,�
� ,. �) . ,... _......� .�„ ,,,,,, �„ _�,....... _. .
� `O �� (�AIR 21 B2A B4P panel 116 B Ya�l 100
� n
.,,,.� .. � ( AIR 21 B2A B4P panel 115 ,,,,,,,,, 15'seclor mount .,.,,.,., 99 ......... .....,,.
, ...,.,. ... ...................
I m EricssonRRUS-11 115� 75'sectormowt 99
-.....� Ericsson RRUS-17 ......... 115.... ......... 15'sector mount ......... ......... 99 ......... .........
. .,. ,,,.........,,..... , ,,,..,.._., .....,.,,,„ ,,,,,,,,,,, „ ,,,,,, , ,,,, _ ,,....,, . ..,
, ��� Ericsson RRUS-11 115 20'x 2,5 omni whlP 99-79
`r�° ,. ' .. KRY 112 7 1/2 TMA ... 115.. . 20'x 2.5"omni whip .... 99-79 ......._
;.. M I �.... 700,f1 ��� KRY11271/2TMA ......... 115.... ......... 2'sldearm ......... ......... '93 ......... .........
m , � '' ......... ........ ..... .... ......... .... ..... ......... ......... .........
� .,, � KRY 112 7 1/2 TMA 115.... B'Yapi '91
� � ... Raycap DC6�B-60-0B-BF su�ge 115.... ......... 10 sector mount ..... .... EB ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,
n Q ' " „ i Q suppressor 10 seclor mount � �1tl ��
< '�� �{ 14 sectof mount ,,,, 115� ,,,, � ,�, �� ��
, � , 10 seclor mount �8B
�' 14 sectarmount 115 """""�" """ """" """""""""""
v ..''.. n .. ,____,________ .2 sldaarm,, 79 . �
� � � � 14'sector mount 115� ���� ���� ��� �
fn A ' I ..... ... 2 sidearm ....... .... �72 .... �'
Q ,� ., ,,-^� �2)AIR 21 B2A B4P Panel_._......_, ,,,,, 115,. .,.,. 3 sidearmni whip ..... ..... �3B 99.. ,. ,
z
MATERIAL STRENGTH
500fl . ra�� �.. ��1.... � ... �U ... �� �a��� ... ��1� ...,,,�U ,,,,,, . .
o ........_ ... � ., .
N A572-50 50 ksi 65 ksi A36 36 ksi 58 I�i
N '
f
I � (
� � � MAX.CORNER REACTIONS A T BASE:
� � DOWN: 22593916
SHEAR: 217201b
���.,.. 300..f.� �� � .
„ I ,� „ � � UPUFT.• -1727541b
� �� � � � '� � SHEAR: 212631b
� � I� ' o AXIAL
N �y 70293 Ib
N J J
� � b
SHEAR MOMENT
�, ( 371951b_f� 30398641b-ft
� I TORQUE 4821 Ib-(t
74 mph WIND-0.7500 in ICE
io o ri AXIAL
-
�
� � 402641b
.o ;- I
p = .... ... �-..„„..�,.
� �
� " SHEAR x "� MOMENT
307111b 25160881b-R
o.on i,
"" �'^ TORQUE 19371b-ft
� � � REACTIONS-85 mph WIND
N
a m a,a
v �, U' G � ..@) a
� m m � � �° 9' �
.�° ' C7 0 , o C7 H � ��Z��i ••
rn
m'��, rv ' ��a
�vl � � O I� F S — ii�u ?i
All-Points Technology Corporation "�`130'Self-���t�ra�_Tower
116 Grandview Road �°'tl'�^'�NY141LTE401 Pecomc
Conway,NH 03818 ��'"�'Verizon Wireless °""'�'�"'� RobAdair '��'�"r_
tc7r�Nu:TYN.fCId�,,222� oape 1�17�PN� sca�e: hC�"�
Phone:(603)496-5853 ._. __ _
��': �a���,����V�-s"�."4"d.�� N�dr.�rsxr���w�.a�w�:�w��q���n��urzm�erieir�raw��rr�����aa���nw�K�� ,�,���i�No ��„���
Appendi.x B
Photographs
VERIZON WIRELESS
130' SELF—SUPPORTING TOWER
PECONIC,NEW YORK
SITE: PECONIC
I ....... . �....... ��I III...... .' .:'r: ':iv...
��� �il: ` I I I I'�����
���PII
��Myl�"'' �„
r,�� 4 p ,
w��,
� � ' ,����f�� �!,
� . � � �
� ��, i���
� �/l �%/���,1�U�F ��
�,�, � v�' J�i
ii�
���,f 1
�,,,;1,,»
t ��t ��; i I���
„*aroiviuFf�l�aliA�f�(U��iro��qq� ��� ; � i�Oi � u ���,'.,
� ���i yr�yv� �,/0/i �,.
/rrr�ri i�iU1�u�111k!7, 'y�� ° NI�`otQori�MNm
p�p � �,�,�v� ����J .
J .,cl�,.�� � ✓/i
i i� ��/iNJIJ 1����
i uitl� I
I''i�R II F�i�(fu(�I� I � u�ii
�(��ruz;�' +rf�uo� il II i �w���l�i�iu�iml�i i����� �0�01�11���11�1���41��u ,
�p��,����(�Il�l��j������l�ll�l ������ � ' ��� ��aa���pqq�� � ��u N�lu�u��o
� i, , � � q uuuu
������I II�IIIII��. i �ipi mil ii ��pu �
Overview photos of 130' self-supporting tower.
��/��,,;, �;
��j� �%�/�
��!/i�� �o�
l�%,.; �
��;, �° i/�
��r
r ��/� ��
111 � � ,�� ,/
�, , f,�
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � �
;fi%��° �;;;,��'" ��; r
///�/„ii�/��/,o/ ? %�,
��
�JJfl fiiai�j'�j�� � j//
�' �' ��/ ��i/�� l� l�' %`�
I�I�i�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�ll�l ���,� ��� �, �
, ��� �� i
I�s��� ���'I
p � � J
r
,Iq���II� '�' � �uilll IUuI������� , I
i
���i� ' � i
�,
�
'� � �
�,
�
� �°'i���''i'���� ' �
�� 1
J �`o,^ ,��p I ��o����//; . ' ,I
r;,,,,,,��, ,, , „„„f,/;�r, �,,,�n�ut�lla�ff!�1�, �� �,� ,�,, . �. �%/// /,,,,�,,,,1�,r ,, � .,�� ,� � � ��« �
Photo of existing antennas on tower; Verizon's array is the lowest panel arraya
Photos taken hy All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C. on December 7, 2015.
VERIZON WIRELESS
130' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER
PECONIC,NEW YORK
SITE:PECONIC
����i�+� �uu�iiiiuuuuuiiiuiiiuuiiiiiiiiuuuu����lll l l l '
������tiiii ii'u"u'li,iiiiii �����
��,
E �
�d
,J�„",1� ,Qy;� `m" '�
���I�ili?� ... �I
��
��/ ,�� '�' , y,!�„ � ' i4�uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuy u �
�f � , ��ilo vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvVV �
��% �I�du� �� � uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuipu
�t ����
���� � ' � i�^ H��
��, ��, ,� �
' </ii �
� � �� i�' ` "'""'llllllllllllllllllll
�^' �� � � �� plll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�r
1
7�� �7'��� r '
U a / �, IV 4` uuuuuiillllllllll
u�
'i �i� i r ;,
i� , �uuuil IIIIII
r C�i
�;; /j
H �
� � I ,fu �i�,
r �' �� ) ��j � �1
�r' �, % Ir
f < �; ' 7 r�
! ,i ',,.,, ;,11„11
Photo of Verizon's e�sting waveguide cables.
��uri r�m��i��������rr�����N�^r���uo���' i� ,�ur° 1 � �„��� �� i ii �y
; � I p��rv,�y�,a ,������ � � l,� U I �� t�,
I � ,, u�ln„ ,yi, 1 r1 i�g 4��'a� n � ��M1 ��I
� � iq /� Je m �r i J i� N 7 ��� �� �'�� �
^'� r'' ( pi4� � i'�� f � � IYd .u� i� �, ahQ4 d,%
'� � i
i ",�
�� r �x
��, u� �.,: ° �..
� �, �
b�iu ,` �d�� l�di�� �r� �
r////��;;/ ;% i� � �d� '���'��
1 ��� � �
�, �i�� � y� M' BU�i".� �u J � '�..
� ' ��� «` b i �D�J � Iw
/ � �. J��l �� '
/% il^��.�i �rra� i� r ,u�lj ,
lYwY�'rtirfi�'.n'y�'Ya�j, ti* �`� �, !1
,o� x "� '^ '.
� ��/�,� a bl, �
ry r��
/// �/ �'
f H ll'���� � �b
�,� I �
/J// � �
fi�i/,�'%�'%1��'!�
�
o�
Photo of typical base plate and anchor bolts.
Photos taken by All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C. on December 7, 201 S.
VERIZON WIRELESS
130' SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER
PECONIC,NEW YORK
SITE: PECONIC
� �
; '
��,��>�, ���� ��U���� � � �
r � ���1(Hl,rGl(,/rua'�
inr��urm.,r:��tr/„vr�fUrr ��r,,;iiirr,<,! ..iOa/6i/��%�/1�%i//�%%eil���a%�iri��///%/P��%/�J�������..
��
/�
i
�
i,
�
r, ;;
a;
I;^ I
,
� ��� ' °
6� ' �
�I' �
"'�, � ;,'
u
/.,,
ai,; %/'o�l
Photos of Verizon's existing antenna mount.
�, a.�� J , �
�
�
� ,� ��,�
,��'�
,
�„
�' �� f
,
I
�
,
��
r ;�.
�
�� fi�/ ,.
rt�
r�� ,.'
i :r
Photos taken by All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C. on December 7, 201 S,
Appendix C
Calculations
, ��Job Pa9e
130'Self-Supporting Tower 1 of 8
ACl- oi s Technolo Project Date
Corporatron NY141LTE401 Peconic 10:59:2012/14/15
116 Crandview Road
Conway,NH 03818 Client Designed by
Phane:(603)496-5853 Verizon Wireless Rob Adair
FAX.•(603)447-2124
�._ .....�� _............._m.._�..
Tower In���� Data �
The main tower is a 3x free standing tower with an overall height of 130.00 ft ahove the ground line.
The face width of the tower is 4.00 ft at the top and 17.33 ft at the base.
This tower is designed using the TIA/EIA-222-F standard.
The following design criteria apply,
Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York.
Basic wind speed of$5 mph.
Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in.
Ice density of 56 pcf.
A wind speed of 74 mph is used in combination with ice.
Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.
Pressures are calculated at each section.
Stress ratio used in tower member design is 1.333.
Local bending stresses due to cl° bing loads,feed line supports,and app enance mo ts are not considered.
� �_a�.........._�..........������..�.............. �..............................�����.�.���_._��.........
Feed Line/Linear Ap urtenances
...,Descrtplion Face,,,Al/ow,.�� Componen! Placem..... m..., ,�, , ..,,,� �.,„, � ... ....,, .. g�,r _��.
ment Face Laleral # # ���� Clear Width or Perrmeter Wei hl �
or Shield Type Offsel Offset Per Spacing Diameter
Leg f[ in (Frac FN� Row in in in plf
3/8"safety A No Ar(CfAe) 130.00-0.00 4.6000 0 1 1 63750 03750 0.22
cable
Climbing A No Af(CfAe} 130.00-6.60 0.0000 6 1 1 3.0000 3.0000 12.d000 7.90
Ladder
3/8 � No Ar(CfAe} 136.06-8.00 0.0000 -6.09 1 1 0.4400 0.4400 0.08
1/2 � IVo Ar(CfAe} 130.00-8.00 0.0000 -0.05 1 1 0.5800 0.5800 d.25
7/8 � IlTo Ar(CfAe} 130.00-8.00 0.1000 0 12 12 11106 1.1100 0.54
1 1/4 C 1Vs� Ar(CfAe} 115.00-8.06 -4.0000 -0.3 21 7 1.5500 1.5500 0.66
3/4" � 14�o Ar(CfAe} 130.00-8.06 0.0000 -0.1 2 1 0.5000 0.7500 0.40
1.57'°Hybrid P Tto Ar(CfAe} 100.00-8.06 6.6000 -0.35 3 3 1.5700 1.5700 0.66
fiber-power
cahle
7/8 A IVo Ar(CfPse� 100.00-8.00 0.0060 -0.35 6 6 1.1100 1.1100 0.54
7/8 A I�o Ae�(CfAe} 106.00-8.00 0.0000 -0.22 7 4 1.110d 1.1100 0.54
7/8 � 1Vo Ar(�gAe) 130.00-8.00 0.0000 0 7 7 1.1100 1.1160 0.54
3/4 C Ii�o Ar(C;fAe} 13d.00-8.00 0.0000 0.02 1 1 0.7500 0.7500 0.40
3/4" � I�io f�.r(Cf,�e) 115.00-8.06 -4.0000 -0.26 2 2 0.5006 0.7500 0.46
3/4" � Il�� fv�(CfAe) 38.00-8.00 �4.0000 -0.28 1 1 0.5000 0.7500 0.40
7/8 B� 1Vo Ar(CfAe� 91.00-$.00 6.0000 0.08 1 1 1.1100 3.1100 0.54
Feedline A IVa Psr(C;fAa� 160.06-8.00 0.6600 035 1 1 3.00(l0 3.0000 8.40
Ladder(Af}
Feedline � No Ar(CfAe} 130.Od-$.00 0.0000 0 1 1 3.0600 3.0000 8.40
Ladder(At}
Feedline C 1Vo Ar(CfAe} 115.(30-$.00 0.0000 -0.3 1 1 3.0000 3.0000 8.40
Ladder(Af}
Feedline C IVo Ar(CfAe} 130.00-8.00 0.0000 0 1 1 3.0066 3.0000 8.40
Ladder(Af}
Feedline � Ivo Ar(CfAe} 90.00-8.60 0.6000 0.15 1 1 3.6000 3.d606 8.40
Ladder(Afl
Job Page
130'Self-Supporting Tower 2 of 8
All I'oi s 7'echnalo Project Date
�.��,��p��c�� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
11 G Grandview Road
Conway,NK 03�Y1� Client Designed by
Phone:(603)496-5853 Verizon Wireless Rob Adair
FfIX.•(6U3)447-2124
�.�....�.. ...� ..........�..��
Discrete Tower Loads
a, a�.,, ,.,.Descr[ lion...,,.. , � d`°ae e m, d3 ,��e� .,.. ,,a..,.. m. ........ ......... .����.., , � ,,,,,,,,, ��, ,,,���. ��.
P Jf (�ff°setr: Azimuth !'Nace�sareral Q;;e.�,¢ Q;.o�a �F/ei�h!
r�v 'P"y�ae FCcrrz Adjushasenl Front Side
L�g Lr�dcra(
Vert
,/e �' f! ft` �"r� !b
6'x 1"omni whip C None 0.0000 130.00 No Ice 0.60 Q.6d 25.00
1/2"Ice 1.22 1.22 30.6Q
1°Ice 1.84 1.84 40.12
16'x 2.5"omni whip A From Leg 3.00 a.aoaa i�o.ao IVo Ice 4.00 4.00 60.00
O.dO 1/2°°Ice 5.63 5.63 �4.63
6.00 1"Ice 7.28 7.28 129.45
6°side�rm A None o.0000 130.00 Na Ice 4.1? 2.09 75.QQ
1{2"Ice 6.17 3.69 izs.ao
1"Ice 8.17 4.09 zao.aa
6'sidearm k3 1Vone 0.0000 1�a.ao Na Ice 4.17 2.09 75.Od
1/2"Ice 6.17 3.69 125.00
1'°Ice 8.17 4.69 zoa.ao
6°sidearm C 1`d¢�ine a.aoaa 136.00 No Ice 4.17 2.09 75.06
1/2"Ice 6.17 3.09 125.00
1°°Ice 8.17 4.09 zoa.aa
800-10121 C From Leg 3.QQ o.oaoa 13a.00 No Ice 5.46 3.29 50.00
o.aa 1/2"Ice 5.8� 3.64 82.41
a.ao 1"Ice 6.31 3.49 120.59
DB]CNH-6565A-VTM A Fram Leg 3.Q0 0.0000 130.Q0 No Ice 5.89 3.53 40.00
a.00 1/2"Ice 6.30 3.�9 76.38
O.dO 1"Ice 6.72 4.28 117.48
DB?CNH�6565A-VTM B From Leg 3.00 o.00aa 130.Od No Ice 5.�9 3.53 4a.oa
O.OQ 1/2"Ice 636 3.89 7638
Q.OQ 1'°Ice 6.72 4.2� 117.48
DBXNH-6565A-VTM C From Leg 3.06 o.oaao r�o.ao No Ice 5.89 3.53 40.Q6
o.oa 1/2"Ice 6.30 3.89 76.38
o.ao 1"Ice 6.72 4.28 117.48
DB?CNH-8585A-VTM B From Leg 3.00 6.0006 ��a.ao Na Ice 5.89 3.53 40.00
a.00 1/2°Ice 630 3.�9 76.38
0.00 1"Tce 6.72 4.28 117.48
DB?CNH�8585A-VTM C From Leg 3.dd o.oaoo t3a.ao Na Ice 5.84 3.53 4o.aa
0.00 1/2"Ice 6.36 3.89 76.38
O.OQ 1"Ice 6.72 4.28 117.48
7262.xx A From Leg 3.00 o.oaoa 136.00 Na Ice 2.68 1.93 ,a.00
o.oa 1/2"Ice �.oa 2.25 28.68
o.ao 1'°Ice 3.33 2.57 48.21
7262.xx S From Leg 3.d6 0.0000 130.06 No Ice 2.68 1.93 S 2.06
o.aa I{2"Ice 3.60 2.25 28.08
o.oa 1°'Ice 3.33 2.57 4�.21
3°x 2'ganel A F'rom Leg 3.00 o.oaoo 130.00 No Ice 8.4d 2.10 40.00
O.OQ 1/2'°Ice �.79 2.38 81.84
o.aa 1'°Ice 9.20 2.66 128.15
(2}TMA 8"x 12" A From Leg 3.00 0.0000 130.Q0 IVo Ice Q.93 0.35 12.00
0,06 1/2°'Ice 1.d7 0.45 17.83
a.oa 1'°Ice 1.21 d.56 25.35
(z}T�rea��°X iz°° s �rom Le� 3.aa a.oaoa t3a.ao �vo iCe o.�3 o.3s ia.ao
a.00 tir°ILe i.a7 o.4s I7.s3
o.aa 1�°cCe I.al a.ss 25.35
(2}Tn�a s°��iz�° c �ram�,e� s.aa o.0000 t3o.00 �va cCe d.93 a.ss i2.00
o.ao liz°°iCe I.a7 0.45 I7.a3
o.aa 1"Ice 1.21 0.56 25.35
ld°sectormaunt A Nane 0.0000 130.Q0 NoIce 1d.1Q 5.65 300.00
1/2"Ice 14.30 7.15 35Q.00
1"Ice 18.SQ 9.25 425.00
Job Pa9e
130'Self-Supporting Tower 3 of 8
flll P��te1s 7'��hneala�gy Project Date
����������� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
116 Grandview RoacC
Conway,NHQ3818 Client Designedby
Phorae:(d03)496-5853 Verizon Wireless
H'f1X.°(603)447-2124 Rob Adair
� � Descrr tion F�re:e"'" � ���ew. �� �ow���. � 00000no ,,,�w o.....�.,,... ...........................W ,� „ ,�,�, � ��,�,,� � �
p " ����� ff'seP �ff,sed,s. Azirrzutds (�lcr�eeaaert8 �.�,� �`nFd,� &Y/edght �
r�r Ty�re Ft'urx. �Idjr.r,sPreteaat Fronl Sicle
Ce� Lceter^cr!
S�er�d
_ _..... _.o,,,,,eee�,,eeee.... � _ _�r�'� �' ,ft....... .. . ... i`� ftz !b
10'sector anount � None d.00d6 130A0 No Ice 10.10 5.05 30Q.06
1/2"Ice 14.3d 7.15 350.00
1'°Ice 18.Sb 9.25 425.00
10°sector mourat C' None 0.0000 130.00 No Ice 10.10 S.dS 300.00
1/2°'Ice 14.30 7.15 350.06
1"Ice 18.50 9.25 425.OQ
LNX�6515D5�T4M A From Leg 3.00 0.6006 115.00 Na Ice 1 I.39 7.66 so.oa
0.00 1/2'°Ice 12.01 8.25 115.61
o.oa 1'°Ice 12.63 8.84 188.87
LNJC-6515DS�T4M S Frorrd Leg 3.00 o.oaoa 115.Ob No Ice 1139 7.66 50.Q0
0.00 1/2"Ice 12.01 8.25 115.61
a.ao 1°'Ice 12.63 8.84 188.87
L�x-6s z sDs-T4�re c Frv��.e� �.ao a.00aa i is.00 rra ice i z.3s 7.66 sa.aa
a.ao �iz^rCe tz.or s.2s tis.si
o.ao 1°°ice ia.63 8.84 rss.s�
(2}AIR 21 �2A B4P panel A Fra�n Leg 2.06 0.0060 115.d0 No Ice 6.59 431 95.Od
0.00 1/2"Ice 7.d3 4.72 136.89
0.00 1'°Ice 7.49 5.15 183.90
(2}PsIR 21 S2A S4P panal B Fram Leg z.aa a.0000 I 15.00 No Tce 6.59 4.31 95.00
0.00 1/2°'Ice 7.03 4.72 136.89
o.ao 1"Ice 7.49 5.15 183.90
(2}AIFL 21 S2A�4P panel C From Leg 2.00 a.000a 115.60 No Ice 6.59 431 95.00
0.00 1/2"Ice 7.03 4.72 136.89
O.Q6 1"Ice 7.49 5.15 1$3.90
Ericsson RRUS-11 A From Le� 3.00 0.0000 115.Q0 No Ice 3.25 1.19 55.00
0.00 1/2"Ice 3.50 I.35 75.86
a.ao 1"Ice 3.75 1.52 99.77
Ericsson RRUS-11 � Fro�n Leg 3.Q0 a.aooa 115.00 No Ice 3.25 1.19 55.00
0.60 1/2°'Ice 3.50 1.35 75.86
0.00 1"Ice 3.75 1.52 99.77
Ericsson RItUS�I l C From Leg 3.00 Q.QOQ6 115.00 No Zce 3.25 1.19 55.60
0.00 1!2"Ice 3.50 1.35 75.86
o.ao 1°'Ice 3.75 I.52 99.77
KFfY 112 7 1/2 TIvIA A From Leg 3.60 a.a000 115.00 No Ice 0.73 0.44 15.OQ
O.dO I/2"Ice 6.86 0.55 20.32
d.00 1"Ice 0.99 0.66 27.27
Y 112 7 1/2 TMA B Froen Leg 3.06 0.0000 115.d0 No Ice 0.73 6.44 15.60
0.00 1/2"Ice d.86 0.55 26.32
a.oa 1"Ice 0.99 6.66 27.27
�C 112 7 1/2 TMfl � From Leg 3.d0 a.00ao 115.00 Na Ice 0.73 0.44 15.06
a.aa 1/2"Ice 0.86 d.55 20.32
O.Od 1'°Ice 0.99 0.66 27.27
Raycap DC6-48-60-18�8F C None O.U000 ll 5.00 No Ice 1.19 1.19 30.00
surge suppressor 1/2"Ice 137 1.37 44.34
1"Ice I.56 1.56 60.93
14'sector mount A None d.0000 115.00 No Ice 14.40 7.2Q 475.00
1/2"Ice 16.50 8.25 7aa.aa
1"Ice 18.50 9,25 950,Q0
14°sector mount B None a.a000 115.00 No Ice 14.40 7.20 475.00
1/2'°Ice 16.50 8.25 7aa.00
1"Ice 18.50 9.25 450.00
I4'sector maunt C None O.d006 115.Od No Ice 14.40 ?.20 475.00
1/2"Ice E6.50 8.25 7d0.00
1"ice 18.50 9.25 950.OQ
2d°x 2.5°°amni whip � Froan Leg 3.00 0.0006 12d.00-1d0.00 1Vo Tce S.Od S.dO 56.00
O.Od 1/2'°Ice 7.63 7.03 86.96
0.00 1"Ice 4.07 9.07 136.55
�'�a�u � Froan Leg 3.00 a.aoaa 1Q6.Q0 No Ice 2.80 0.09 60.00
0.00 1/2°'Ice 3.45 0.13 $2.30
Job Page
130'Self-Supporting Tower 4 of 8
Alls t�i s�7'�chrtol� Project Date
���.����tr�� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
1/6 Grandview Raad
Conway,NH 03818 Client ' Designed by
Phoree:(6Q3)496-5853 Verizon Wireless
FRX.�(6Q3)447-2114 Rob Adair
�W. . ,.�..,��.esr.rtpPlara F, „� � ,,�.o ��. �� �,� n.,. �,P,,,.�a e �ww,� o00000000 �,00000.
7) crr_e �lf�set �ffscd.e: Azrmuth C�laeerraent „ ,s�,,. �CnAn�„P �°a�n G�6rei�hC
or Ty�re CCcrr^z Adjustmenl Fraret ,Srde
Ceg La�ercrl
��rt
. __ _„�Pt, ......... � ..,,,..... ....... ...�e,eee f� �e�. tb
-- - _.
a.00 1°r�� a.la a.la Iit.4a
2Q'x 2.5"omni whip C From Leg 3.00 Q.Q006 i zo.aa�1 aa.oa Na Ice 5.00 5.6Q so.oa
0.00 1/2'°Ice 7.03 7.03 86.96
O.OQ 1"Ice 9.67 9.67 136.55
20°x 2.5"amni whip A From Leg 3.00 a.aoaa 79.00-49.00 No Ice S.Qd 5.00 sa.ao
o.o0 1/2°°Ice 7.63 7.03 86.96
6.Od 1°Ice 9.Q7 4.Q7 136.55
20'x 2.5"amni whip C From Leg 3.00 a.00aa 79.06�99.dQ IVo Ice 5.00 5.06 SQ.QQ
0.00 1/2'°Ice 7.03 7.03 86.96
a.00 1"Ice 9.07 9.Q7 136.55
GYS C From Leg 3.06 o.00ao too.aa No Ice 0.6Q 0.66 sa.ao
a.aa 1/2°Ice 0.79 Q.79 55.81
o.ao P"Ice Q.99 0.49 63.86
(2)SBNHH-ID65B A From Leg 3.Q0 a.aaaa iaa.ao No Ice 8.33 5.34 50.06
a.aa 1/2"Ice 8.88 5.79 l OQ.05
a.ao 1"Ice 9.43 6.26 156.20
(2}SBNHH-1D65B P From Leg 3.00 U.OQ60 1Qd.QQ IVo Ice 8.33 534 sa.00
0.00 S{2"Fce 8.88 5.79 106.05
0.00 1'°Ice 9.43 6.26 156.2Q
(2}SBNHH�1D65B A Fram Leg 3.d6 0.60d0 loa.00 Na Ice 8.33 534 SQ.OQ
a.00 1/2"Ice 8.88 5.79 lOd.dS
d.Qd I°°Ice 9.43 6.26 156.20
DB�CNH-8585S-VTM A From Leg 3.Q0 a.00ao 1 aa.oa No Ice 8.3� 5.41 50.06
0.00 1/2"Ice 8.93 5.86 10038
0.00 1"Ice 9.49 6.33 156.89
DBXNH-8585B-VTM S Fram Leg 3.66 aaaao lOQ.QO IVo Ice �38 5.41 so.00
o.o0 1/2"Ice 8.93 5.86 iaa.3�
a.aa 1"Ice 9.49 6.33 156.89
DB?C[VH�8585B-VTNi � rrc�urh E�e� 3.Q0 a.00aa raa.ao Na Ice 838 5.41 SQ.OQ
a.aa 1/2"Ice 8.43 5.86 100.38
a.oa I"Ice 9.49 6.33 156.�9
(2}RFS FD9R6004_2C-3L f4. Fram Leg 3.d0 o.oaoo i ao.00 No Ice 0.37 Q.Q8 5.60
diplexer a.aa 1/2"Ice d.45 0.14 7.30
Q.OQ 1°°Ice 0.54 6.26 10.69
(2}RFS FD9R60Q4_2C-3L � Fram Leg 3.60 a.00ao l OQ.06 No Ice 037 Q.QS 5.06
diplexer a.00 1/2°Ice 0.45 Q.14 730
O.dO 1"Ice Q.54 o.zo 1d.69
(2)ItFS FD9R6004_2C-3L �' Fram L,eg 3.00 0.60d0 iaa.oa Na Ice 037 O.d8 S.OQ
diplexer O.d6 1/2"Ice 0.45 014 7.30
Q.OQ I"Ice 0.54 0.26 10.69
ALU�13 RRH2x60 /4. lF�°�r�n lL�;� 3.00 a.0000 r ao.oa No Ice 2.40 1.52 56.06
o.o0 1/2°'Ice 2.61 1.71 73.28
a.00 1°'Ice 2.84 1.91 93.35
�vBi� zX6o � r°ram�,eg 3.aa a.oaao lao.oa �r�iCe z.4a i.sz s6.00
a.oa lir�rCe 2.6r 1.�1 7�.z�
a.00 1°°Ice 2.84 1.91 93.35
�.���13 �2x6d �° ffxarzr]Le� 3.00 o.oaao 100.Od NaIce 2.40 1.52 56.06
a.oa 1/2°'Ice 2.61 1.71 73.28
o.o0 1"Ice 2.84 1.91 93.35
ALU R 2x60-AWS A, From Leg 3.00 Q.OQ66 1 aa.oa No Ice 3.77 2.06 60.OQ
w/bracket a.00 I/2"Ice 4.d8 2.34 83.19
o.oa 1"Ice 4.40 2.63 11d.Q2
ALU R 2x60-AWS ff� From Leg 3.00 0.0660 l Od.06 No Ice 3.77 2.06 6Q.00
v✓/bracket a.oa 1/2"Ice 4.Q8 2.34 83.19
0.00 1"Ice 4.4Q 2.63 110.d2
AL,U 2x60�AWS � Fram Leg 3.Qd O.Ud00 iao.oa No Ice 3.77 2.06 6o.aa
w/bracket a.ao 1/2"Ice 4.08 234 83.19
a.ao I'°Ice 4.4Q 2.63 110.02
�,u s2s 2X6a a. Fram Le� �.aa a.00aa ioa.aa �ra Ice 2.so �.so 51.00
Job Pa9e
130'Self-Supporting Tower 5 of 8
ACI� oi s 7'e�h�tolo Project Date
�.��,�����r�� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
116 Granclvrew Road
Conway,NH U3�18 Client Designed by
Phone:(603)496-5853 Verizon Wireless
Ffur. (603)aa�-zlza Rob Adair
� Descr-r�tir�vr kacc CJfse! l3ff,sets�. �FzrrraerCh " � ���„�„ ,���� ����� �,.. �„� .�� � �� �� �� ,
ar_evns_nC �',��1,� C;,a�n �elgh8
r�r Tygae FCa�rz ��jR�,sPrraerr8 Front ,Sid�
Leg Lufera!
verl
��,.... . �� �� �� ��. «
0.00 1/2"Ice 2.72 I.69 68.46
d,00 1"Ice 2.95 I.89 88.75
AL,U B25 RRI-I2x6Q B From Leg 3.00 0.0000 1 Q0.66 Na Ice 2.50 1.SQ s I.oa
6,00 1/2"Ice 2.72 1.69 68.46
O,dO 1"Ice 2.95 1.84 88.75
P LU B25 RRH2x60 C From Leg 3.00 0.000o ioa.oa No Ice 2.Sd 1.56 S 1.QQ
O.QQ 1/2"Ice 2.72 1.69 68.46
0.00 I"Ice 295 1.89 88.75
Raycag RDC-3315�PF�48 A None o.000a 1 aa.oa No Ice 2.93 1.91 30.00
J�bax 1/2"Ice 3.16 2.11 52.86
I"Ice 3.40 2.31 78.84
Raycap RDC-3315�PF�48 B None o.aaaa loo.00 IVo Ice 2.93 1.9t 36.00
J-bax 1/2"Ice 3.16 2.11 52.86
1°°Ice 3.4Q 231 78.84
Raycap RDC-3315-PF-48 C Nane o.aaoo lao.ao Na Ice 2.93 1.91 30.dU
J-bax 1{2"Ice 3.16 2.11 52.86
1'°Ice 3.4Q 2.31 78.84
15°sector maunt A None a.00aa 99.d0 Na Ice 9.10 9.10 465.OU
1/2"Ice I2.56 12.56 600.06
1"Ice 15.54 15.54 735.00
I 5'sector mount B 7�IaeGe a.000a 99.Od Na Ice 9.10 9.10 465.d0
1/2"Ice 12.56 12.56 60d.06
1"Ice 15.54 15.54 735.60
15'sector mount C� IVame o.oaoo 99.OQ No Ice 9.10 9.1 Q 465.Qd
1/2"Ice 12.56 12.56 600.Q0
1'°Ic� 15.54 15.54 735.QQ
2°sidearm 1� iV�une o.aaoo 43.00 No Ice 0.95 d.48 za.aa
1{2°'Ice 1.45 0.73 35.00
1'°Ice 2.25 1.13 50.00
6°Yagi C None o.oaao 91.Q0 No Ice o.aa d.00 O.Od
I/2°'Ice U.dQ 0.00 a.oa
1°°Ice 0.00 0.00 O.Od
16'sector mount A None o.oaoo 88.OQ No Ice ia.�0 5.05 36Q.00
1/2"Ice 14.36 7.15 356.6Q
1"Ice 18.56 9.25 425.OQ
10'sectarmount tl!� Nane a.oaaa 8�.OQ NaIce l0.ld 5.05 300.06
1/2"Ice 14.30 7.15 �so.oa
I"Ice 18.50 9.25 425.00
16°sector mount C IVane O.dQ60 88.d0 Na Ice 10.10 5.05 3dd.Q0
1/2"Ice 14.3d 7.15 350.00
1°°Ice f 8.50 9.25 425.d0
2'saai,��ron S Nane a.oaao ��.00 NaIce 0.95 Q.48 26.OQ
1/2"Ice 1.45 Q.73 35.60
1'°Ice 2.25 t.13 SQ.00
2°sidearm B None 0.6GOd 7z.ao IVa Ice 0.95 d.4& 26.Od
1/2"Ice 1.45 0.73 35.00
1°°Ice 2.25 1.13 so.00
6°x 1°omni�vhip C F'rom Leg 3.d0 a.0000 44.00-38.60 No Ice 0.60 0.60 25.00
o.oa 1/2"Ice 1.22 1.22 3d.6d
O.Od 1"Ice 1.84 1.84 40.12
3'sidearm C None 0.0000 38.OQ No Ice 1.43 0.72 30.OQ
1/2"Ice 2.18 1.Q4 65.00
1"Ice 2.93 1.47 los.oa
Job Page
130'Self-Supporting Tower 6 of 8
flllm mistPs 7`echstt�lo Project Date
���.���.����� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
116 Grandview Raad
Conway,NH 03818 Client Designed by
Phoree:(6U3)496-5�53 Verizon Wireless Rob Adair
FAX. (603)447-2124
�._._._���__.��w.....__ _........_ _.....__��������_�w�___���
Dishes
�� L)e,s�rx�+tiorr� �'�ce�� CJi.sh ��"�����"�Q7ff.set�����,�f,se8sr ����Azrrrrafh��� 3dB E(evafran� ����0utsrde��� �„� ����� Aperture Weight��
ar Type '/'ype ffoYz Acljuslment Beam Diameler tdr�a
Le� LraterceC Wldlh
�er^t
_---
��' c� rt�...._ ?��` �� ��' !b
2'dish,no radome S Parabatoid avJr.� From 3.6Q o.00ao 130.00 2.00 Na Ice 3.14 SQ.QQ
Itadame Leg a.aa 1/2°Ice 3.41 67.50
a.oa 1"Ice 3.68 85.00
3'dish,no radome A Parabalaid w!a Fram 3.Od o.oaoo 136.Qd 3.Q0 No Ice 7.07 7s.ao
R�dome Leg O.OQ 1/2"Ice 7.47 113.33
0.06 1"Ice 7.86 151.66
� e ......... �_..w.�,-. A ..�� . ��.-..
Solution Summa��
....� .._ ....�..�...............W_ ..
Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind
,.� Seafirrrz.� ��� �`CeviceCirrrr �,.��A, Horz. ,,m„ Cav`. ,,,,,..� , , Tift,,�. m...:.., Twi��,� ,,,,,,.�,
. st
No. Defleclion L.rycacB
(1 in C`ovnb. `" '�'
T1 _ 130-ll0 l.�ga y 0.1P33 6.6161
T2 110�90 1.567 9 O.1Q68 0.0137
T3 9d-76 1.04� 4 Q.0926 0.0089
T4 7d�SQ 0.654 4 O.d75d O.Od33
TS 56-30 0.34Q 9 0.0534 0.0611
T6 30-ld d.f 37 9 0.0293 0.0006
T7 10�0 0.024 4 O.OQ98 Q.00Q2
WWWWWWWWWW��WWWWWWW��� Critical Deflections and RadWWWWWWWW��WWWWWWWWWW��
ius of Curvature - Service Wind
,�,�, Elevalion �. �I��r�rder�avace,�, �� �.�,, , .,,,,,.,,Crav. L1e� ec°frcrvt .�., 7ilf��, �.� A.a� m,.Av,.� ..,� ,o,aaw, �
� I ��.�� fl � Twrst �cr�°iu,s of.
I,oc�d C'urvcreuYe
Jd �ornb. in "' " ft
130.60 2'dish,no radorne 9 1.993 0.1133 0.0161 925945
12Q.Qd 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 1.749 0.1 ld8 0.0151 462966
115.00 LNXe6515D3-T4Ivi 9 1.628 0.1091 0.6145 308643
11 Q.60 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 1.507 d.1 d68 0.0137 216391
ios.aa 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 1.388 O.1Q39 0.0127 137610
106.U0 20'x 2.5'°omni whip 9 ].271 0,1 QQS 0.6116 97609
99.00 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 1.24� Q.0998 0.0113 92246
94.00 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 I.I35 O.Q959 d.01dQ 72391
93.00 2°sidearm 4 1.113 0.6951 o.009s 69562
91.d0 6'Yagi 9 1.d69 d.Q934 6.0092 65372
89.00 2d'x 2.5"amni whip 9 1.026 0.0918 O.OQ86 63430
88.60 10'sector mount 9 1.005 0.0910 O.Od83 63225
84.00 26'x 2.5"omni whip 9 0.922 O.d876 0.0071 64777
79.d0 20'x 2.5"omni whip 9 0.$22 0.0833 0.0057 67562
78.00 2'sidearm 9 0.8Q3 0.0824 0.6054 68148
7z.aa 2'sidearm 9 6.690 Q.Q769 a.003a 7Q989
44.d0 6'x 1"omni whip 9 0.267 O.Q461 d.0069 41641
41.00 6°x I°°amni whip 9 d.235 0.0424 O.OQQ8 45056
38 OQ 6 x 1 omni wh�� 9 0 206 0 0387 0 0008 49080
Job Page
����'�`���°������� 130' Self-Supporting Tower 7 of 8
All-I'oi�rts T�chnalogy Project Date
Cos��aratiorz NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
116 Grcandvrew Roac!
Conway,NK03818 Client Designedby
Phone:(603)496-SE53 Verizon Wireless
FAX.•(603)447-2l24 Rob Adair
�..��.._..__........���������� ................���
Bolt Desi n Data
. SecPaa�n Eteveation ,.,C`oratpowr��rt ��Bo(( 13olt Size IVatrrrber� Iblaxa�nuror Atdowabte ��.�� � ,., ���� � ��
L�tatio fIl(rlwabfe �'rrteria
Nrs. 7°,ype Grude C1J` �uac!pJer Luael F,a�acf RcztFrt
je ira f3zrlts �erdt lb fflfr)wubCe
tb
.
T1 130 Leg A325hi 6.7500 6 2474.22 14438,66 a 12� 1333 Bo[t Tension
Diaganal A325N o.�sao 1 3467.12 6I 17.19 a 567 1.333 Member Bearing
1'op Girt A325N 0.6256 I 447.29 33gg•44 6.132 1333 Member Bearing
T2 110 Leg EL3'l5N l.Q0U0 6 720d.09 34557.Sd �208 1,333 Bolt Tension
Diagana! A325N o.�soo 1 5402.15 6117.19 Q 8g3 1333 Member Bearing
T3 9d Leg k325i� i.a000 6 13016.7d 34557.SU �377 1.333 Balt'Cension
Diagonal A32SN a.�soo 1 5946.95 6117.19 �g72 1.333 Member Bearing
T4 70 Leg A325N 1.1250 6 18219,36 43736.80 �417 1,333 Bolt'I'ension
Diagonai A:i25i�1 0.75Q0 1 6246.74 6117.19 1.021 1333 Member Bearing
TS 50 Leg A325T1 1.1250 6 22318.16 43736.70 0,510 1.333 Bo[t Tensian
Diagonal A325T�i 6.6250 R 7500,79 1U19530 a736 1333 MemberBearing
T6 30 Leg [#325N I.2506 6 26295.56 53995.80 a 4�� 1.333 Bolt Tension
Diaganal A325I�T 0.6250 E 7771.55 10I95.3Q a�62 1333 Member Bearing
T7 16 Leg A325N z.00ao 6 27661.30 138236.00 a.2a� 1.333 Balt Tension
Diagonal A325N 0.6250 V 8525.63 1Q195,30 a.836 1333 MemberBearing
.... .... �._...���� ���� ���.. m . ��.
Section Capacity Table
.,e,SECIIO�o..�. ,.. „�,,.�, . . .. .,� ... .. ,,, „,.� ,.,m,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ..�,,,,�,,. ,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,o,. ...,� ..,.v .....,,,,., ......,�„ �,�.,,,,,��. �
• � �levatrr�sa Crsrraporrerrt Size Co�tticaf I' S�'*k�u�,w % f'ass
No, � �Y/,� �teme�rf db 16 �'crpaclty �ail
_ _. �
Tl 130-110 Leg 3 3 -23210.30 17�979.26 13.0 Pass
Diagonal L2 S/2x2 1/2x3/16 ld -3619.72 ]6661.83 21.7 Pass
42S(b}
I'ap Girt L2x2xl(8 4 -c472.10 7174.55 6.6 Pass
9.4(b}
T2 110-90 Leg 3 1!2 33 -60914.30 212�18.77 28.6 Pass
Diagonal L21/2x21/2x3/16 37 -5729.46 11516.63 49.7 Yass
66.2(b)
T3 90-70 Leg 4 54 -103485.00 315007.13 32.5 Pass
Diagonal L3x3x3(16 56 -5735.12 14933.06 38.4 Pass
729(b)
T4 7U�50 Leg 4 75 -140449.00 318007.13 44.2 Pass
Diagonal L3x3x3/16 77 -6468.I0 1154199 56.0 Pass
?6.6(b}
T5 50-30 Leg 4 96 -171439A0 38U239.57 45.i Pass
Diagonal 2L2 1/2�1/2x3/16 99 -7770.69 20822.66 37.3 Pass
55.2(b}
Horizonta[ L21/2x21/2x3/16 103 -363437 6795.50 44.7 Pass
Inner Bracing L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 166 -5.22 4853.61 d.3 Pass
T6 30-10 Leg 4 1!2 135 -203115.00 504735.1U 40.2 Pass
Diagonal 2L2I/2x21/2x3/16 138 -8386.I1 17242.49 48.6 Pass
57.2(b}
Horizontal L21/2x21/2x3/16 134 -3627.$0 5134.66 70.6 �ass
Inner Bracing L2 1/2x2 1/2x3/16 146 -5.83 3674.8Q d.4 F'ass
T7 10-0 Leg 4 1/2 174 -220386.00 504735.10 43.7 �'��s
Diagonal 2L2 1/2�1/2x3/16 177 -6Q23.80 15713.27 383 1'ass
Job Page
130'Self-Supporting Tower 8 of 8
ffl�lm or�tts 7'��httolta Project Date
������,����� NY141 LTE401 Peconic 10:59:20 12/14/15
116 Crrwnclviewlfoc�cl
�'oraway,NF103�18 Client Designed by
Phorae:(603)496-5853 Verizon Wireless
F°AJC.�(603)447-2124 Rob Adair
�ec°lao� omooElevratloea,,.�.,,,� C'orrr onene ,,,,, �`rz� �....,,,, �� mm,�e,��Mmm.���m....., „, �,,,,�..,. �.n ���.
� n p reeiccal f' ,SF*f�,rruw % �as�s°
Jyo, ft 'l'y�� Elemer�d Ib !b CcrFsaclty F'ai/
_ ... _ ,.... . ................. ...................... ....................................... ........
62.7(b)
Iiorezont�al �,21/2x21/2x3/16 178 -3968.13 4518.56 87.8 I����
I�es�racsng L,2 1/2x2 E/2x3/16 185 -6.01 3240.31 0.4 l��tt��;
Surnrnary
I.e�(T'S) 45.1 Pass
I)iago�sal 76.6 Pass
(1'4}
Iior�zontal 87.8 Pass
�T7�
'fop C's�rt 9.9 P�ss
(T'1�
Iranee 0.4 ��ss
�rac�reg(T'7)
�olt C;hecks 91.4 Pass
I8A'I'II�TG= 91.4 P�ss
PINNAC�E TE�ECOM GROUp
Professiona/and Technical Services
�
�cR�'n°�eern t"�urdPPly�
ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMp�IANCE
ASSESSMENT ANd REpORT
PREPAREd FOR
NEW YORIC SMSA LIMITEd PARTNERSIiIp
d/b�A VERIZON WIRE�E55
�� ,1����6�'��:�� �il�"�
�
r � �
.°���� �1�d +(��� � �r � = y
,,, 1 Y , ,` . � r ;..
� � � . r ..
.,B ,..,,,,J� r , ,.
N
�N��4�I�I�G��,� �� ���,,. �� � � :w��
�ANUARy 7, 2016
14 RidqEdalE AvENUE - SuirE 260 • CEdAR KNO��S� NJ 07927 • 9T3-451-1630
CONTENTS
INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARy '/
ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S
COMP�IANCE ANA�y515 S
COMP�IANCE CONCLUSION �3
CERTIFICATION �4
AppeNdix A. BACI(C�ROUNd ON TI1E FCC MPE LIMIT
AppENdix B. FCC REFERENCES ON RF COMP�IANCE
2
INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARy
At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has perFormed an independent
expert assessment of radiofrequency(RF) levels and related FCC compliance for
the modification of wireless antenna operations on a lattice tower at 41450 Main
Road in Peconic, NY. Verizon Wireless refers to the antenna site as "Peconic",
and antenna modifications are proposed to facilitate wireless service provision in
Verizon's FCC-licensed frequency bands, including 746, 850, 1900 and 2100
MHz.
The FCC requires all wireless antenna operators to perForm an assessment of
potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the
transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or
modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) limit in the FCC's regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment
needs to include the RF effects of other existing wireless antenna operations by
AT&T and T-Mobile — along with other antenna operations by other parties,
including the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future
antenna collocators to assess and assure continuing compliance based on the
cumulative effects of all then-proposed and then-existing antennas at the site.
This report describes mathematical analyses of compliance with the FCC MPE
limit for safe continuous exposure. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated
using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively
overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way,
though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the applicable MPE limit,
we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied.
The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by
describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit.
If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than
100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels
consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration
of compliance with the MPE limit.
3
The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows:
❑ At street level around the site, the conservatively calculated maximum RF
level from the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as proposed to be
modified, along with the other existing antenna operations in the
immediate vicinity, is 1.9278 percent of the FCC MPE limit — well below
the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, the worst-case
RF level from the antennas is more than 50 times below the FCC MPE
limit.
❑ The results of the analyses provide a clear demonstration that the RF
levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations
satisfy the criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF
emissions, and the proposed antenna operations will be in compliance
with the FCC regulations and limits concerning RF safety. Moreover,
because of the conservative methodology and operational assumptions
applied in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will
be even less significant than these calculation results indicate.
The remainder of this report provides the followinga
❑ relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as
proposed to be modified, and on the other existing antenna operations
included in the analysis;
❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing
MPE compliance, and application of the relevant data to that model; and
❑ an analysis of the results, and a compliance conclusion for the antenna
operations at this site.
Two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC
limit for RF exposure. Appendix B provides a list of key FCC references on
compliance.
4
ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA
Relevant compliance-related antenna and transmission data for the Verizon
Wireless antenna operation, as proposed to be modified, is provided in the table
that follows.
��r����l L��t� �.�„����
_W�W :. �.�.......� � �mm� � _,_
Frequenc r�Bands , 746 MHz, 850 MHz, 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz � �
_
Service Covera e T e ' Sectorized three sectors
....................�. ...... ..����...���..._��.�.�
_AntennamT�pe Directional Panel
Antenna Centerline Hei hc.�t AGL ������� 100 ft. � � �
Antenna Line Loss Conservativel i nored assumed 0 dB
� �..�. ,..,.�...
7�G�,�"�����,� �...,.._�s�
_ , � M ommsco e�H....1 D65.B.....�14mm5 dBi
Antenna Model Max. Gain C
RF Channels er Sector 2 40 watts
���������� W����� '
RFtChanMelse1er Sectoaln������8�20 wattsDBXNH-8585B�13.1 dBi �
"��0�'l�,�1�,p'��'�
..�.._� ........... ... � ....�.. �� ...,�„, ..�� ����
j Antenna Model (Max. Gain) Commscope�DBXNH-8585B�(����������� ���... ....���,
17.7 dBi)
i Commsco�emSBNHH-1D65B 18.0 dBi
............. ........_.�����������
RF Channels er Sector 4 16 watts and 4 40 watts
.��
�°���"��1�L����
( ww ww ) Commsco e SBNHH-1D656 18.5 dBi
Antenna Model Max. Gain
RF Channels er Sector � 2 40 watts �
� _��� .w��� � : � �..�.. � ; .......�:....._..� �� ; ;,
The area below the antennas, at street level, is of interest in terms of potential
"uncontrolled" exposure of the general public, so the antenna's vertical-plane
emission characteristic is used in the calculations, as it is a key determinant in
the relative level of RF emissions in the"downward"direction.
I�y way ot illustration, rigure i fhai ioliows show the vertica�-piane raaiation
patterns of the antenna model used by Verizon Wireless in the 746 MHz band.
Note that in this type of diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three
o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different
5
angles is described using decibel units. Note that the use of a decibel scale in
the diagrams incidentally visually understates the relative directionality
characteristic of the antenna in the vertical plane. Where the antenna pattern
reads 20 dB, the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward
angle is 1/100�h of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at
30 dB,the energy is 1/1000'h of the maximum.
Note that the automatic pattern-scaling feature of our internal software may skew
side-by-side visual comparisons of different antenna models, or even different
parties'depictions of the same antenna model.
Figure 7. Commscope SBNHH-1 D65B Antenna—746 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern
..�..�...����....... ....����..........
���.��!
� �,�„��1..��� /� ���j���"'�,.,,
� ..�
:�'•�""���� ?�/``�"',� `,'
a� � � �,,i �
�,"»���',I� ��
� „�...�d
� ' � �l-;a�l� ,
Jt
t����� �"�� � Odeg
_. I horizon
��/�i'� "
� � �� ,
�l ( .-'�^
���7� ,�� �
,,�� �� m.���.. f ���,,,
,.� :. . �
���PH�,�.,�`.--~�""'z 5 dB/division
As noted at the outset, there are other existing antenna operations to include in
the compliance assessment. For each of the wireless carriers, we will
conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at
maximum transmitter power in each of their FCC-licensed frequency bands.
In addition, we performed a search of FCC licensing records, and are including in
this compliance analysis all transmitting antennas found within 500 feet of the
6
subject tower, and for those facilities we will apply the transmission parameters in
their respective FCC licenses..
AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2350 MHz frequency
bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses two RF channels per antenna sector
and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses
two 20-watt channels and two 40-watt channels per sector. In the 1900 MHz
band, AT&T uses two 60-watt channels and two 80-watt channels per sector. In
the 2350 MHz band,AT&T uses finro 50-watt channels per sector.
T-Mobile is licensed to operate in the 700 MHz, 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz
frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, T-Mobile uses one 40-watt channel per
sector. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses four 20-watt channels and one 40-
watt channel (for a total of 120 watts) per sector. In the 2100 MHz band,
T-Mobile uses one 80-watt channel and two 40-watt channels (for a total of 160
watts) per sector.
In addition, the results of the FCC records search identified the following
facilities.
Keyspan is authorized for omnidirectional transmission in the 154 MHz band,
with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts.
The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) is authorized for omnidirectional
transmission in the 173 MHz and 455 MHz bands, with a maximum transmitter
power of 100 watts in the lower band and 75 watts in the higher band.
The Town of Southold Police Department is authorized for omnidirectional
transmission in the 155 MHz and 156 MHz bands. In the 155 MHz band, the
maximum authorized transmitter power is 45 watts. In the 156 MHz band, the
maximum transmitter power is 50 watts.
We note that there are also two small point-to-point dish antennas on the subject
tower. There are no FCC records for these operations, which means that they
either are receive-only or otherwise transmit in the FCC's allowable "unlicensed
7
microwave" bands, in which their transmitter power levels are limited to less than
one watt. The FCC regulations "categorically exclude" all point-to-point
microwave antenna operations from the need to demonstrate compliance,
because of their use of very low power and highly directional antennas. Those
characteristics result in insignificantly low RF levels at ground level around a site,
and the FCC deems all categorically-excluded facilities to automatically be in
compliance.
COMPLIANCE ANA�y515
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65")
provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various
points around transmitting antennas.
At ground-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the
antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power
and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the
levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line
distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF
exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the intervening ground.
Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfecY' mirror-like reflection, the worst-
case approach.
The formula for street-level compliance assessment for any given wireless
antenna operation is as follows:
MPE% _ (100*Chans*TxPower* �O�Gmax-Vdiscl10) *4 )/( MPE*4�'` RZ )
where
MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit
applicable to continuous exposure of the general public
100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage
Chans = maximum number of RF channels per sector
8
TxPower = maximum transmitter power per channel, in milliwatts
10 �cmax-vd�s�i�o� � numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the
downward direction of interest; data on the antenna
vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer
specifications
4 � factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy
reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship
between RF field strength and power density(22=4)
MPE � FCC general population MPE limit
R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of
interest, centimeters
The MPE% calculations are perFormed out to a distance of 500 feet from the
facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended
standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 2, below.
antenna
�,(�
�� �
height
from �
�� ��``"-- R
antenna 1 f �``'-M...�����-�,w
bottom to �� � � �`"�. ��"��`'�- �'"`�
� � � ��
6.5' � �
above f f� ����-�;"`"�,,
ground � � � ��'"�„
level � � ��. �
� ��'
, (! r � �..",��� '�-�.,,�
w WW f� ....� . �� ���..�I'I �
� r,, 500
Ground Distance D from the site
Figure 2. MPE%Calculation Geometry
It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower
the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of
MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical-
plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the
antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing
9
distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance
approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes
less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a
result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well
understood to be in compliance.
Street-level FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the
following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation
is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE%
contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference
for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE%
contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding
100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-
compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are
consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a
clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that
according to the FCC, when panel antennas are involved, the compliance
assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF
effects of directional antennas facing generally away from the point of interest are
insignificant.
The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into
the MPE% calculations on a general basis:
1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum
power and maximum channel capacity.
2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the
line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored.
3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by
assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom
(rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna,
as applicable.
4. The RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced
(increased)via a "perfecY'field reflection from the intervening ground.
10
The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF
exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur—and the purpose of
this conservatism is to allow very"safe-side"conclusions about compliance.
In addition in this case, we have taken into account the different technical
characteristics and RF effects of the two antenna models used by Verizon
Wireless in the 1900 MHz frequency band.
The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for
each operator, with the maximum (worst-case) overall result highlighted in bold in
the last column.
11
� � W�el ss W�ele s W ieless W�eless AT&T T-Mobile �Key p�� ������.� ������..........,
Ground s an LIPA Southold Total
Distance 746MHz BSOMHz 1900MHz 2100MHz MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE%
�n� MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE%
0 0.0089��� Q.Q48Q 0.0034 m��„tl�,U�7�C� 0.0286 0.0022 0.0020 0.0018 0.0301 � 0.9294,m�
w.. _�.�.�. ,.m.. . �.� �...;.. ..�,._.�.� � �,�........�.n,.
20 0.0171 0.0027 0.031 g 0.0153 0.0548 0.0086 0.1376 0.1054 0.411 Q OJ843
... � . � _��r�� .� .�....._�..
40 0.0513 0.0102 0 Q956 Q.QQ79 0.0892 O.Q118 0.2661 t�.�U3� 0.2301 1 0260
� .��_......______ 0.2102 0.0050 0.2b87� 0..�. ....m��__,�_.,. ... �..�.�m... _ ....... �,..,.w
� .1527 0.1348 0.0401 0.1942 ' 0.2307 0.2483 14832
.�.��...._..__. _ 0.1600 0.0690 0.0419 � O.QfiQ4 .... �� �,.........m.r...�m � �� �_,._..,
Q.Ob83 Q.Q49Q 0,0512 q.�1�a4 0.2937 08594
.............����m.� ..
100 0.0048 0.0545 1.6g72 ��0,0 �"" � � ������������� ������� �.��
145 (7.0480 O.C1420 C7.004� i 0.0242 0.0483 1.9278
.M.,,.,. ��..�. �.__ ... �n�m_�_____
-�___�,�, �,�,_„ .....���.......��,,,
120 C�.0142 0.0107 0.8833 0.3616 Q 1452 p.1695 O.Q403 0.0665 0.0427 , 1.7342
�14A „ �0.0441 0.0189 0.0919 - 0.0792 _0.7144 ... (7.91779�... 0.088" � '�.� ' _ __.. _
6 0.1222 OA915 1.5487
��� 18i7 �������Cf.0737��„���0.0353 0.0401 � 0.0030 1 1057 ���������
0.1704 p 133Q Q.1623 0.0268 1.7503
180 .Y Q.1194 .. ...Q,Q381 . �_1344 0.0060 O.B253 0.0366 0.1842 0.162$ m. 0.0533 �(��1.81J3 �
..�. N .. ___ OB46 1,8811
-240 0.1904 �.��0� �4121 '."0 0123 0 5069--_I 0 0756_ 0.2098 �2080 0��94 IT 1.4706
220 0.1776 ��Q75,,, ����� • n p09g 0.1348 � 0.0858 0.2678 0.1�g$ �.1Q47 1.1439
.,�� ��._�_ �..�
260 0.1562 � 0.0054 � Q,Q454 ��
p,Q224 O.OB05 0,0807 �.��3i� 0.2316 0.125C1 1.0442
n..�
�v_„� ���..
280 0.1084 0.0458 0.0011 d.01J9�.m m.(1.0773 O.U713 0.2880 0.2313 Q.1838 Q,9785
������._. . ....... �.���� � ., ,...,.._
300 0.0730 0.0781 O.Q2Q3 Q.QQ49 0.1501 0,0547 0.2707 t�.�l�+�� 0.1518 i 1.(7485
�,. ,... ��...�...��... .m..�_.._ ,�.m�_..m..., ���.,...��
32Q 0.0428 0.1203 O.tl555 O.C7C113 0.1960 0.0442 0.2715 0.2746 0.1515 11617
_______�. .. .... eee_...�....._... .�..� �.� _. �...
� 340m� 0.0220 0.1703 0.0797 0.0102 p.231p O.Q516 0.2661 �J,Z�43 0.1520 1.2642
�.. ........ p ..--_._._.,......�. .,,.,,.,,. .. ........,........ .,� .
3fi0 .�..0.0197 �'�1.'q�a�� i1.0716 O.Otl91 0 2483 0 0810 0.258� '�0.2531 � U.1�541 � 1.2463
__ ----- ------- --- AA.. „ .... � _ _ ----- --
�w.. ...,
38C1 � 0.0123 0.2015 0.0551 0.0177 q.25Q7 Q.123Q p.2491 0.2621 0.1601 1.33tl5
400������������� 0�0178 0.2547 0.0197 0.0 �� �� ������ � 57
���150 m m 0.25z4 0.15�µ� ��0.2251m�� 0.2674 0.1673 1.3759
42tl ��������0.018i7 0.2�21 � 0.0180 0.0148 � 0.2307�� Q.1420�� 0 2250������
� 0.2733 0 1765 , 1.3282
......,�.mA,...
_ �.�....... . .....� _ .......� .,...,.,___..-
440 �O.Q331 p.2B18 p,0044 0,0069 0.2501 0.1444 0 2156 (7.�5i7� (7.1759 1.3625
46tl 0.0804 0.2587_�n___0.0041 0.0064 0.2976 0.1108 0.1980 Q.2601..... 0.9698- 1,?��5�---
480 Q Q571..... ,
Q.3Q42 0 0135 0.0041 0.2747 d.10�2 (7.1824 0.239$ 0.1b84 1.3444
500 O.d5�b 0.2911 0.0125 m 0.0038 0.3392 0.0541 0.1806 0.2438 0,1571 1,3248
12
As indicated in bold in the last column of the table, the maximum calculated RF
level from the combination of antennas is 1.9278 percent of the FCC MPE limit—
well below the 100-percent reference for compliance, especially given the
conservatism incorporated in the calculations.
A graph of the overall street-level calculation results, shown below, perhaps
provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative compliance of the calculated
RF levels. The line representing "total MPE% results" shows an obviously clear
and consistent margin to the MPE limit.
COMPLIANCEASSESSMENT RESULTS
Normalized FCC MPE Limit Total MPE% Results
120 � � �... . �. ... ._ ,
I
a 100
� � �
80 '
Q � �_. . . ..�. �
O
= 60 i
d
' C9 40
� �w � , �
20
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Distance(ft)
COMPLIANCE CONC�USION
According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that
continuous human exposure to RF fields up to and including 100 percent of the
MPE limit is acceptable and safe.
In this case, at ground level around the site the calculated maximum RF level
from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations is 1.9278
percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, even with the significantly
conservative methodology and operational assumptions incorporated in the
13
analysis, the worst-case calculated result is still more than 50 times below the
FCC MPE limit.
The results of the analyses provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the
FCC general population MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative
calculation methodology and operational assumptions applied in the analysis, the
RF levels actually caused by the combination of antennas at the site will be less
significant than the calculations indicate.
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned certifies as follows�
1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety
and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq).
2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in
this report are true, complete and accurate.
3. The analysis of RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the
applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and
industry practice.
4. The results of the analysis indicate that the antenna operations at the subject
site will be in compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning
potential human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas.
���'�"�,�.�,���1�'�°"� 1/7/16
Patricia A. Stankovich �mmmmmm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm������� � Date
Manager—RF Compliance
14
AppENdix A. BACICGROUNd ON TIiE FCC MPE LIMIT
As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established
limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields.
The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus
of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters.
Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its
guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical
community—notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its
Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE
limits for both occupational and general population exposure.
The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of
human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR)of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to
accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form
of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or
greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an
additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population
exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of
more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of
both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous
exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to
result in no adverse health effects or even health risk.
The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and
assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had
appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they
receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is
assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the
exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment.
The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using
alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and
power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cmZ). The
table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general
population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio
frequency ranges.
15
Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure
(MHz) (mWlcmz) (mWlcmz)
0.3- 1.34 100 100
1.34-3.0 100 180/F2
3.0-30 900/Fz 180/F2
30-300 1.0 0.2
300- 1,500 F/300 F/ 1500
1,500- 100,000 5.0 1.0
The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's
occupational and general population MPE limits.
Power Density
(mW/cmz)
100 Occupational
`x
d
.
�� """.w W W`" General Public
��.'" �
�
�
�
,
�
5,0 '
�„
ti
,
,
�
,
,
,
1.0 "
� , .....�............. ..........
; ,m.,�.�._................
ry ,
�
�
k J��
4 F
ry �
O.L �'ry d
� M.�.......�..._,r...,.........,,......�.xT
M f ...�......... .... .9 � I � � �
0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 '���,�J�G�
Frequency(MHz)
Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE
limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by
the systems of interest.
16
The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the
RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the
MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually
expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit.
For potential exposure from multiple systems or multiple frequency bands, the
respective percentage contributions of the MPE limits are added, and the overall
percentage sum is compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less
than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure
mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance.
Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" all "non-building-mounted" wireless
antenna operations whose mounting heights are more than 10 meters (32.8 feet)
from the routine requirement to demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit,
because such operations "are deemed, individually and cumulatively, to have no
significant effect on the human environmenY'. The categorical exclusion also
applies to all point-to-point antenna operations, regardless of the type of structure
they're mounted on. Note that the FCC considers any facility qualifying for the
categorical exclusion to be automatically in compliance.
17
AppENdix B. FCC REFERENCES ON RF COMP�IANCE
47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310
(Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits).
FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State
and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(8)(v) of the Communications Act of
1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiafion (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular
Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's
Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulafion of Commercial Mobile Radio Service
Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997.
FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of
Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiafion,
released December 24, 1996.
FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the
Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996.
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance
with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields",
Edition 97-01,August 1997.
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers
About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4,August 1999.
18